Slashdot Mirror


Archos Widescreen PMP

An anonymous reader writes "Archos has just announced their newest portable audio/video player the AV 700 Mobile DVR. The new unit has a 480x234 pixel widecreen display, a hub to record from TV and DVD, and offers a 100GB drive. The sucker is heavy though weighing in at over a pound. Cost is $799 for the 100GB model and $599 for the 40GB. MP3 Newswire also has Part 1 of its MP3 players for summer. Most interesting are Creative's new Neeon and a high end unit from Bose."

142 comments

  1. Hot Damn by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I got 1st post! And the DVR looks great...

  2. HDTV support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why's there no HDTV support?

    I want a tivo like device that I can control with WiFi from my computer (share content, setup etc).

    It'll fit right under my TV where the Xbox 360 was going to go.

    1. Re:HDTV support? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      It's possible there is no HDTV support because there are fewer scanlines than an SD signal supports ...

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:HDTV support? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      True. Also, full bitscream recording of ATSC is about 5GB per half hour, which is a lot of space even for a 100GB drive.

      One thing that gives ATSC a benefit is the digital transmission, you don't get ghosts or snow.

    3. Re:HDTV support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Then I highly suggest you pick up an AVeL Linkplayer2, supports Divx-HD, and some WM9HD. It can play files either on disc or via networked PCs.

      You can find more information at http://www.iodata.com/products/products.php?cat=HN P&sc=AVEL&pId=AVLP2%2FDVDLA&ts=2&tsc=15

  3. Re:widescreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16x9 pixels qualifies as widescreen, my friend. :D

  4. Re:widescreen? by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 1

    Tis "mobile" my friend

  5. Bad Size... by ThomasFlip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If people want to listen to music, the will want something smaller, if they want to watch video, they will want something bigger. I personally don't think that combining a portable audio/video player is a good idea or will sell well.

    --
    If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    1. Re:Bad Size... by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I always liked listening to my shows while watching them.

      It's more like a Video player that happens to play music too.

      IMarv

    2. Re:Bad Size... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 5, Funny

      maybe i can install one in my car so i don't have to pay attention to stupid traffic. that would be awesome.

    3. Re:Bad Size... by bfields · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If people want to listen to music, the will want something smaller, if they want to watch video, they will want something bigger.

      Yeah, would someone who has one of these portable video players explain what they're actually *for*?

      I can see that a DVR that you can occasionally carry from one place to another might be nifty.

      But I can't see it for, say, watching movies on the commute--anything that fits in my pocket is going to be too small to watch.

    4. Re:Bad Size... by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      and if people want to watch video they're going to need better battery life than :
      Up to 30 hours for music. (TBC)
      Up to 4 hours for video on built-in LCD. (TBC)
      Removable battery (additional battery optional)
      that's pretty bad, most laptops approach that duration even when they're spinning a DVD drive. i guess the formfactor of this machine isn't allowing for a very substantial battery
    5. Re:Bad Size... by Sawbones · · Score: 1
      Traveling

      I don't own one, but I've travelled with a couple people who do. They presumably last longer than a laptop, you don't have to carry around a load of DVDs - but you do have to encode them ahead of time. Granted that isn't a terribly large target audience but there is a call for them.

      And actually what they used it for wasn't for watching DVDs but for watching recorded TV shows (the whole DVR thing) which does give it an edge over the laptop and DVD player.

      --

      Ad in classifieds: Pandora's Box (no box) $5
    6. Re:Bad Size... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      If you want to predict market results for consumer products, then I suggest you predict them 70 or more years into the future. That way when the results come in, you're predictions will either be forgotten, or you'll be dead so it won't matter. Do you know how much money is being spent on making video for CELL PHONES? If people want to watch video on cell phones, I don't think a 480x234 pixel widecreen display is too small for them.

      but all I really know is that I won't buy it because I don't think the ability to watch movies while I'm in line at the grocery store is worth 800 bucks to me, nor even 600.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    7. Re:Bad Size... by spectral · · Score: 1

      "most laptops" my ass. Show me ONE that can spin a dvd and decode mpeg2 and last 4 hours.

    8. Re:Bad Size... by asland · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing when I saw the older Archos. But a month ago I was on a business trip to Turkey doing a machine install. A french guy who was on site had an Archos 80GB and used it as a VCR, mp3 player, and external hard drive for his laptop. He is on the road 85% of the time and for him it makes perfect sense. He recorded the Gran Prix while we were on site and we watched it at night - excellect quality when replayed on a SDTV.

      But the price!!...

    9. Re:Bad Size... by Fringe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe, maybe not. I'm considering one for a different set of uses:
      • Carry around a large HD with archives of my various systems
      • Be able to play any of my large CD library tunes in my car, wife's car or rental car (using FM Modulator)
      • As a PVR when travelling, for playback of recorded content in the hotel room (e.g. exercise videos, favorite shows)
      • Long intercontinental flights, since the movies only change monthly and I often flight more often than that.
      Sure, it's no iPod replacement, but do we really need another iPod replacement? The AV700 would be more useful for my needs, which don't include jogging or lots of normal walking with it.
    10. Re:Bad Size... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      I used one for exactly what you descibe - watching TV on a commute. Well, I actually used an iPaq, by ripping shows from my Tivo and re-encoding them to WMV appropriate for PocketPC display. It worked pretty well. The only problem was that dark scenes were a bit iffy due to the relatively poor contrast of the screen. Other than that, ot worked fine (barring the usual poor UI of media players).

      I would hold it in front of me - seemed large enough. It's not like I used to prop it up on the seat opposite or anything.

      It was pretty cool because the iPaq is so light and thin (I had a 1Gb SD Card, so I could get a few hours of video on the card at once).

    11. Re:Bad Size... by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      well, i said "approach". i have two laptops that can get nearly 3 hours, which i would call fairly close to the mark. the point is that this thing isn't spinning a DVD, it should get a lot more life shouldn't it? don't those little dedicated DVD players (that are also spinning the disc) get something on the order of 8 hours of life?

    12. Re:Bad Size... by spectral · · Score: 1

      I think they use specialized low power decoders and have smaller screens (less to light up), no HD, etc..

      What laptops do you have? My T41 seems to like to start to choke and die after ~2hr. It's the work laptop, so I can't really replace it.. but I'm curious.

    13. Re:Bad Size... by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      i have a 12" Powerbook and a HP/Compaq NC6000. i'll pull out a long movie and make sure that i'm not on crack about the battery life, but batteries come in various qualities even for the same model of machine. all that aside, don't you think that the 4 hours on this P[i]MP is pretty meager? $600 is a lot of money for a dedicated media player

    14. Re:Bad Size... by spectral · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's really not so good of battery life for the money. I suspect it's the backlight, again.. considering the audio gets nearly 8x as much. Though, with video you'd have to keep the HD running more (less room to buffer) and work on decoding the video (can be pretty tough..)

      Dunno. :)

  6. Mistake: title was supposed to read... by ian+rogers · · Score: 1

    Archos Widescreen is PIMP!

    1. Re:Mistake: title was supposed to read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo holmes, true ghetto doggs aint doin' them grammer rulz.

    2. Re:Mistake: title was supposed to read... by ian+rogers · · Score: 1

      Fiddy Cent was recently heard saying that Archos is "Fresh like Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh."

    3. Re:Mistake: title was supposed to read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, just thinking that. "Archos P.I.M.P."

  7. Re:widescreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    twice as wide as it is tall seems like a widescreen, at the least wider than the standard 15" or 15.4" width ratios.

  8. Bose MP3? by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    No highs? No lows? It must be Bose!

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Bose MP3? by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      I always think of noise cancelling when I think of portable Bose.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    2. Re:Bose MP3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy
      Other
      Sound
      Equipment

    3. Re:Bose MP3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, AudioVideo International magazine recently found the Bose Wave music system to have the most accurate reproduction of musical instrument sounds. It's sleek, compact, and has extraordinary sound. Bose actually re-engineered the tapered wave guide to reproduce one-half octave lower musical notes than the original Wave system you're probably thinking of.

    4. Re:Bose MP3? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an ad to me.

      The no highs, no lows, must be Bose is a much older adage than the Wave system.

      A few years ago, my dad tried out a WaveRadio CD and compared it with a friend's 60 disc CD changer/tape/radio unit of about the same price, and the changer system won both on cost and sound quality.

    5. Re:Bose MP3? by zenneth · · Score: 1

      I've personally compared the Bose Waveradio CD player to high-end Onkyo and HK systems with multiple speaker configurations, just to see (re:hear) the differences at lower volumes. The Bose system, maybe because it's designed to play at lower volumes, definitely had a clear advantage in both sound quality and range. However, trying to fill a large space is not the Waveradio's forte, nevermind what the hype says. Yet in a bedroom or small office you can get an excellent performance from the Bose's small package.

      heheheh... I said package.

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    6. Re:Bose MP3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, Im too lazy to open an account here. dont care if they call me a coward. Wanted to reply to the Bose thread quickly.

      Just search rec.audio.opinions, rec.audio.high-end and tons of other sites to realize that Bose is about mediocre quality and great marketing. I cant believe people at slashdot would fall for Bose. Check out http://www.intellexual.net/bose.html for a criticism of Bose Acoustimass systems.
      Wave Radio ? Check out this head to head comparison on geek.com :
      http://www.geek.com/hwswrev/conel/tabrads/

      People dont criticize Bose just for the high price. Bose loses on sound quality, thats why so much criticism. Bose is about psychoacoustics, not accurate reproduction of sound.

    7. Re:Bose MP3? by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "Bose is all about the quality of sound"...

      Now I gotta clean off my keyboard since I just spewed coffee all over it...

      Mark

  9. Wimpy by da007 · · Score: 1, Funny


    "The sucker is heavy though weighing in at over a pound."

    Hit the gym, Nancy.

  10. I want a better screen by maynard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't want to spend $800 on a portable display device that doesn't render at least 480p DVD quality. The specs listed are ambiguous. It says that there's a doc station for pass through to a VCR. Does this mean that its only external output is composite? If so - yuck. I expect at least component, and preferably also DVI/HDMI. And why would I want to carry 100GB of disk space on a portable if it won't output true 480p? Never mind that disk space like that is appropriate for HD as well.

    So, my opinion: nice toy; waste of money. --M

    1. Re:I want a better screen by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      100GB, that's only 10-20 full DVD rips. Which sometimes I prefer for the extra features.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    2. Re:I want a better screen by maynard · · Score: 1

      No. It records and plays MPEG4 and DivX, not MPEG2. You'll get more than 20 full length movies out of 100GB of storage. Read the article. --M

    3. Re:I want a better screen by Sawbones · · Score: 1
      Google on the MobiNote. Here's the largely fluff product page: http://www.mobinote.net/na/product_dvxpod_eng.asp.

      720x480 screen and larger than the competition, but only a 20 gig harddrive. Still, if I were to hack a larger drive into a PMP I'd do it with this one. Reviews seem generally positive but I haven't taken the time to sink $500 into one to tell for myself.

      --

      Ad in classifieds: Pandora's Box (no box) $5
    4. Re:I want a better screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      100GB, that's only 10-20 full DVD rips.

      My god man use a better codec. You can fit around 142 DVD rips on that with divx

  11. Re:widescreen? by TERdON · · Score: 1

    Sure it's widescreen. Contrast ratio is 2.somedecimals:1, compared to the normal 4:3. It's very small though. I'll keep to my iBook for watching pr^H^Hmovies on the go, more real estate on the screen...

    --
    I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  12. Port!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woweeee
    Any plans to port rockbox to it!?

  13. hmmm.... by rokzy · · Score: 1

    not seeing much reason to buy this over an 80GB iBook. ymmv.

  14. Songs? by bi_boy · · Score: 1

    For those who RTFA, man I can't wait to get all those songs off my video camera onto my Archos AV700! =P

    --
    Chicken fried butter sticks? Do ... do you use a fork? - Black Mage, 8-Bit Theater
  15. Re:widescreen? by TERdON · · Score: 1

    Contrast ratio? I wonder what I smoked. Yadayada, you get what I meant. :)

    --
    I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  16. Gmini 400 is still pretty sweet. by falloutboy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I recently starting commuting to Manhattan, and like many straphangers*, I want to listen to anything but the preachers and beggers on the subway. I was about to buy an iPod mini, but when I saw how much the Archos Gmini 400 does, I was blown away. I'm a photographer, so I have a bunch of high capacity compact flash cards lying around that I could actually use with the Gmini, which has a CF reader.

    Archos Gmini review: http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20041021/

    * Straphanger: slang for a subway rider. NYC subways used to have leather straps that riders could "hang" from in order to not fall when the car started moving. They've all been replaced by metal bars.

    1. Re:Gmini 400 is still pretty sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice astroturf, but remember for next time, no real person would uneccessarily use a slang term only to give two-line definition of it at the end.

    2. Re:Gmini 400 is still pretty sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no use to me because I tend to drive around in my Dodge* truck**.

      *Dodge: A US automaker founded in 1901 by a pair of bicycle cranking ninnies. Now owned by a German conglomerate, their products tend to be both crappy and overpriced, an exhilirating combination that has consumers flocking for miles to buy the latest in gas guzzling breaking-down technology.

      **Truck: Similar to a car*** in function, trucks generally have a cargo area for hauling large goods.

      ***Car: A motorized vehicle, generally using an internal combustion or electric hybrid engine, used for rapid transit around paved roads.

    3. Re:Gmini 400 is still pretty sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you stupid ass, why would you use an obsolete term only to have to explain what the fuck it means a half dozen lines later? nobody says straphanger. because it's dumb as shit. like you. you stupid fuck.

    4. Re:Gmini 400 is still pretty sweet. by IncarnadineConor · · Score: 1

      How do you get the pictures off the card? Maybe I'm inept but I couldn't figure it out when I took it on vaction with me. I bought it more for watching movies in class, the CF reader was a bonus I wasn't aware of, which is why I wasn't too concerned when I couldn't figure out how to work it, but if you could tell me that'd be swell.

    5. Re:Gmini 400 is still pretty sweet. by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      I had one of those, It locked solid the first time I tried to play an MP3 on it, and I read that the battery life was actually about 1/2 the quoted time.

      So as a device for storing photos when out in the field it was spectacularly unreliable. Use a handful of 1Gb CF cards instead.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  17. Terrible Idea by ilyanep · · Score: 0

    That's too big for a music player, too small for a video player.

    --
    ~Ilyanep
    To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
  18. It weighs 0.6kg by MarkByers · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of us not from the US that con't be bothered to type 20.8oz in kg in Google.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:It weighs 0.6kg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      600g.

      You're not native with metric, are you? :P

    2. Re:It weighs 0.6kg by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      That's just funny - my laptop weighs 0.83kg and has exactly 7 times as big a screen :)

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    3. Re:It weighs 0.6kg by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      heavy?

      I say rugged!

    4. Re:It weighs 0.6kg by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say either. I'd say that approximately 5kg is suitable for a portable device. Light enough to carry, heavy enough to stay in place when you put it down, and heavy enough to feel valuble and solid, rather than light and flimsy. Well 5kg for laptops, perhaps 1kg for mp3 players.

    5. Re:It weighs 0.6kg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and we believe you too.

    6. Re:It weighs 0.6kg by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      At 1.8lbs, that's probably one hell of an expensive notebook. I suspect that the battery life isn't too great, either.

  19. It took me 17 times by SushiFugu · · Score: 1

    It took me 17 attempts before my brain managed to stop reading the title as "Widescreen PSP". :(

  20. You know you're a geek when... by BBrown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... you think a pound is heavy.

    1. Re:You know you're a geek when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try walking around with 1# in your front shirt pocket or on a lanyard around your neck. Not everyone is a metro that carries around a handbag.

  21. Heavy but fragile? by DegeneratePR · · Score: 1

    I like the idea of making everything portable, and also trying to fit in as many functions as possible. But as this equipment gets smaller and smaller, I'm just scared out of my f'n mind to spend $799 on something so small, that will either: a) get lost easily or, b) break while in my pockets.

    BTW, whatever I do that'll make a small, portable unit break in my pocket is my business.

    1. Re:Heavy but fragile? by wootest · · Score: 2, Funny

      From the weight of it, I'd be more worried about the unit breaking your pocket.

    2. Re:Heavy but fragile? by wootest · · Score: 1

      ...Okay, that may have come out wrong. You know what I mean.

  22. Re:widescreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what I smoked...

    a cock perhaps?

  23. Re:widescreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they're very big pixels.

  24. Re:widescreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shh, don't tell my girlfriend.

  25. A better Archos model is the PMA400 by StarCharter · · Score: 1

    The Archos PMA480 http://www.archos.com/products/overview/pma_400.ht ml?sid=j2232s23by4oy2kbocfyjy is a even better device. Plays video at 704x480, plays the same games, records from TV, has 802.11B, runs on linux, includes Opera, weighs LESS than a PSP, and costs $799. Admittedly, it has a smaller hardrive but that's easy to fix. I don't like the touchscreen keyboard but you have to give up something.

    1. Re:A better Archos model is the PMA400 by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The question when thing start costing this much is if your better off with a laptop , the machine is smaller , lighter and has a larger hard-drive than most laptops in that that price range .
      Though it lacks a keyboard , the screen is smaller and it cant directly play DVDs .
      I can see the thing being highly hackable if it runs linux but i doubt it would ever have as many features as a laptop .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:A better Archos model is the PMA400 by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      has a smaller, lower resolution screen and uses a 1.8" hard drive. Replacing the drive with a larger one is not trivial either.

  26. DVD features by tepples · · Score: 1

    It records and plays MPEG4 and DivX, not MPEG2. You'll get more than 20 full length movies out of 100GB of storage.

    To some people, a "full length movie" includes all menus (including menu games), all deleted scenes, audio tracks in all languages and commentaries, and all angles (for those educational or erotic titles that actually use multiple angles), and everything else the director filled 7.95 GiB with. Can commercial MPEG-4 implementations handle those DVD features?

    1. Re:DVD features by maynard · · Score: 1

      Can [this] commercial MPEG-4 implementation[s] handle those DVD features?

      That's a good question. The published specs don't say, so I can't argue one way or the other. MPEG4/DivX will rip a movie with significantly higher compression, as I assume you're aware. I've seen DVD quality or better movies ripped at about 1GB or so. My belief - based not on what's published about this player, but personal experience - is that yes, you'll see significant space savings over DVD at MPEG2. The eye candy like menus, directors commentaries, and other features don't take much space. Documentaries ripped at MPEG4 offer the same compression savings over MPEG2. So - again, yeah. 100GB with MPEG4/Divx is going to give you a hell of a lot more than 20 DVD quality movies. --M

    2. Re:DVD features by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The question wasn't about space but actual capabilities, whether it can perform those functions. Sure, director's commentaries don't take much space, but if a person has to re-encode a movie twice to get normal audio and a director's commentary, then forget it, it is stupidly inconvenient.

    3. Re:DVD features by tepples · · Score: 1

      My belief - based not on what's published about this player, but personal experience - is that yes, you'll see significant space savings over DVD at MPEG2.

      You'll also see significant space savings by throwing away all the extra content produced for the DVD release that was not shown in the theater. Some people want to preserve everything on the DVD.

      The eye candy like menus, directors commentaries, and other features don't take much space. Documentaries ripped at MPEG4 offer the same compression savings over MPEG2.

      But do the common DVD-to-MPEG-4 tools preserve the multiple audio tracks, the menus, and extra Titles such as making-of featurettes and deleted scenes, or do they only store the primary video and primary audio of the main Title?

    4. Re:DVD features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To most people, however, full length means either a) at least 90 minutes b)or it's exactly the same as the un-cut feature film that one would see in theatres.

      Who cares about most of that stuff? Honestly!? Most movies are so craptacular that they don't merit the time, not to mention that the extras are just fluff to fill up a DVD! Sometimes they even have as much extra content (size wise) as the freakin' movie. Most people don't give a crap about all that, or listen to boring-ass director and cast commentary... Maybe if they did something funny, like make sound effects, and comment MST3K-like it would be worth it, but they don't, and it's not.

      Unless I were in a full-body cast (and therefore not able to run away screaming), having ran out of other movies to watch, without any TV reception whatsoever, I'd never do it--except perhaps to see how they did some of the special effects on a movie I enjoyed... And I could count that list on my two hands.

    5. Re:DVD features by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 1
      Questioning DVD features in MPEG4 Jeff DeMaagd said:
      The question wasn't about space but actual capabilities, whether it can perform those functions. Sure, director's commentaries don't take much space, but if a person has to re-encode a movie twice to get normal audio and a director's commentary, then forget it, it is stupidly inconvenient.


      The question isn't if MPEG4 has those features - it doesn't. MPEG4 (DivX/XviD/others) is a compression format for video, not a wrapper (avi/ogm)
      OGM supports multiple audio and subtitle streams in one file, AVI does not support multiple subtitle streams, but it does support multiple audio streams.
      I doubt this device supports OGM, but if all you want is the multiple audio streams (normal/comentary/alt. language) than you can rip a movie to an MPEG4 AVI with those features.

      Then the question becomes if this device supports playing alternative audio streams.....
      --
      I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
    6. Re:DVD features by maynard · · Score: 1

      You'll also see significant space savings by throwing away all the extra content produced for the DVD release that was not shown in the theater. Some people want to preserve everything on the DVD.

      I don't think this is true. Of course, it depends on the DVD release - some DVD sets offer more secondary content than others. But I don't believe that in most cases it's a "significant" amount in comparison to the primary content. Now I'm talking storage space consumed here, not desirability of the secondary content. The point here is that MPEG4 compresses better than MPEG2 used in DVDs. So at the same image quality, with the same content, you'll use less disk space. Much less.

      But do the common DVD-to-MPEG-4 tools preserve the multiple audio tracks, the menus, and extra Titles such as making-of featurettes and deleted scenes, or do they only store the primary video and primary audio of the main Title?

      OK. So I"ve seen MPEG4/DivX do DD5.1. I haven't seen any encodings of various commentary tracks, menus, etc. Then again, neither have I looked for that feature. So I don't know. And the published specs on this device says nothing about playing that secondary even were you able to encode it. So - beats me. --M

    7. Re:DVD features by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      The question isn't if MPEG4 has those features - it doesn't. MPEG4 (DivX/XviD/others) is a compression format for video, not a wrapper (avi/ogm)
      Au contraire.
  27. So why not buy a notebook? by enosys · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You could buy a new notebook PC for the same price. You can do a whole lot more with it and it has a bigger screen and better image quality. You also won't have to worry about getting video to a format that is readable by the device. The notebook would almost certainly be able to play DVDs and you can install whatever codecs you need.

    I guess the only good things about devices like this is that they're smaller and come pre-configured for their task.

    1. Re:So why not buy a notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.001% of the public has any idea of what a codec is. You need to get some non-geek friends to help you get a real perspective.

      "I guess the only good things about devices like this is that they're smaller and come pre-configured for their task."

      How about not having to deal with updates, antivirus, firewall, spyware, popups, trojans, BSOD, etc.

    2. Re:So why not buy a notebook? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      it's kinda like the TIVO argument.

      buy one.. see how it affects you.

      I have an AV 340.
      if the battery recharge cycle hadn't died so fast, it would have seen a lot more use, as it is, I use it as a distant vcr.

      Connected to my glasstrons, I enjoyed overseas flights a lot more than the airline offerings, for up to 9 hours....

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:So why not buy a notebook? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Startup time: that's why.

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:So why not buy a notebook? by enosys · · Score: 1

      I thought notebooks usually have some kind of sleep mode with fast wakeup from that.

  28. am i missing something here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    why would i go for something like this for $799 when I can get a brand new iBook thats much more flexible for $999? It doesn't sound as if this unit is exactly lightweight... and, at least with the iBook, I get DVD playback and a larger screen as well...

  29. About the MP3 gear in second article by cojsl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thoughts on the 2nd linked article on MP3 players: 1. The Bose is CD based. Bose really doesn't get it. The extra time, effort, and waste of making a CD every time to change the music selection is too much of a hassle vs. flash and hdd players. 2. The Maxfield Diablo plays OGG, neat.

    1. Re:About the MP3 gear in second article by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      The D Cube is worth looking out for if Ogg Vorbis floats your boat. They're Koren (I think) so they're not that easy to get hold of, but they play Ogg Vorbis just fine, and the site just doesn't do justice to how pretty they are. They're smaller than an iPod Mini.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  30. Re:widescreen? by m50d · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's wider than standard 16:9 or 4:3

    --
    I am trolling
  31. From the article: by lidocaineus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bose is all about the quality of sound (as opposed to Bang and Olufsen who are all about style and exclusivity).

    As soon as I read that, I knew these people know nothing but marketing hype.

    1. Re:From the article: by Reverberant · · Score: 1

      I strongly agree. While I'll be the first person to defend Bose against unwarranted charges of 'crap' it's hard for me to not laugh at someone denigrating B&O, especially since their Beolab 5 loudspeaker is easily the 2nd best loudspeaker I've ever heard (behind the Wilson Watt Puppy)

    2. Re:From the article: by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      I must also agree. I find Bose to be a bit Yuppie-ish and not woth the price for the quality, which is certainly good just not by any means unsurpassed as "they" would lead you to think.

  32. Re:widescreen? by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

    actually the ratio is 16:9, the same as you get in a movie theater =P

    --
    I am Spartacus
  33. advertisement overload by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1
    Is it me or is this story just an advert?

    Firefox catches popups and banners but what action can i take against /vertisements. We need some kind of Tivo solution for /.

  34. Right by maynard · · Score: 1

    And what you ask isn't there in the article. Missing those features wouldn't bother me as much as the poor screen and lack of component/DVI output. If I could hook it up to my projector or HDTV and get 480p out, then one could argue the value proposition - I suppose. But lacking then, then - for me - forget it. We each have a killer feature we demand, I suppose. --M

  35. Repeat your basic 6th grade maths, PLEASE. by TERdON · · Score: 1
    3/4 * 480 = 320.

    Seems like they're skimping on (320-234)*480 = 86*480 = 41280 pixels then.

    Unless, accidentally, 480 / 234 ~= 2.something...

    --
    I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    1. Re:Repeat your basic 6th grade maths, PLEASE. by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      OOPs sorry ... I didn't do the math I just wanted to clarify that widescreen referred to the ratio and noth the size of the screen. At any rate i guess it's at least wider than the average 3:4 ratio. I'll do my homework next time =D

      --
      I am Spartacus
  36. Why do they always forget... by shmlco · · Score: 1
    Why do they always forget about books? Every time I look at the specs for one of these portable entertainment devices I find that they, 1) don't support Audible, and 2) do not have a book reader.

    I have an iPaq that, quite literally, has over a hundred ebooks on it. And while I'd love to replace it with a device that could play movies and tv, I'm not going to dump my favorite form of recreation...

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    1. Re:Why do they always forget... by jrboatright · · Score: 1

      YES! Books. Both audible, and text. The Gmini has enough screen to READ BOOKS as well as listen to them.

      (Thank God for Project Gutenberg and Baen!)

    2. Re:Why do they always forget... by jerryasher · · Score: 1

      I have an Archos AV420, and basically I agree with you. I would love to access Audible content on my device. But that's not quite accurate, because I can, just not as conveniently as I wish.

      The AV420 has a 20Gb hard disk and can plays mp3.

      I can relatively easily overnight let Audible play a book on the PC and use any of a number of programs to capture the sound off the audio card.

      That does get me the ability to play the audible content, and does let me bookmark my place in the content, but not the ability to jump to audible's sections within the content, and not a terribly easy way to chop up the book in say, two - four hour chunks.

      So I encourage you to write to Archos and ask for an Audible reader!

    3. Re:Why do they always forget... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Archos? I'd rather have books, audiobooks, music, video, and movies on Apple's new vPod....

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    4. Re:Why do they always forget... by jerryasher · · Score: 1

      Yes, me too. So where do I get one?

      (The Archos AV400 has been out for six months.)

      (Maybe it will be announced later this week.)

  37. It weighs 1.3lb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know... I can't relate to Ounces (unless it's the liquid kind), and not much more to kg's... It weighs 1.3 lbs And no, I'm not american either

  38. So? by Anthony+Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't we all enjoy video on our iPod now*?

    Well. Ok. Maybe not. But just wait until tomorrow when the new shiny Intel Inside® videoPods present themselves in the hand of His Steveness.

    *Don't buy or sell the so called "videoPod Shuffle" to sight-impaired people on eBay these are not endoresed by Apple.

    --
    This .sig is the short tail.
  39. that's PMP'in by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

    oh yeah.

  40. I've got the AV300 by SkyFire360 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've owned the JBMM20 and the AV300 - the great-grandfather and grandfather of the AV700 - and I have to say that they're amazing pieces of technology. They run embedded firmware on the DSC25 that is compatible with linux so you can run Linux on it if you really want. The video playback on the AV300 is stunning, even at 352x240 resolution: you can read subtitles clear as day. It has decent quality sound (much better if you get a nicer pair of headphones like the Seinnheiser HD280 Pro), a bright lcd screen and 3-4 hours of video playback on the "Low Brightness" option which ironically is quite bright still. Oh yeah... and it plays DiVX

    For anyone that's interested, don't even think about getting the bigger harddrive model. Both old and new models use standard 3.5" laptop harddrives, which means you can buy one off of PriceWatch and slap it in there. Just format it with a FAT boot sector first and you're good to go.

    1. Re:I've got the AV300 by geoffaus · · Score: 1

      I thought FAT was limited to 32GB?

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
  41. Tivo needs something like this by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

    Tivo needs to have a small unit like this. Or heck let Archos Tivo OS on their machine. Tivo would have to work on the aspect of making it more portable. But it would sell.

    1. Re:Tivo needs something like this by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      There already is scheduling on these units. Currently, they use either their internal scheduler, or alternatively, you can use My Yahoo's TV scheduler. Personally, I think that's a pretty cool feature.

  42. Mp3's for summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After getting bored of my same old Rio Karma. I decided to pick up the iAudio X5. This is the cream of the crop of ipod sized mp3 players. It supports Ogg Vorbis/FLAC/Mp3/WMA/Xvid Mpeg 4 video and has a rather nice 18bit color screen. Packed in with FM Radio, Voice Recording, Picture Viewing, Line Recording and BBE enhancement I had to check it out for cheaper than what the Rio Karma was selling for. I love this thing and I am sure we will see it in another part of Mp3Newswire's MP3 Players for Summer. Definitely a Geek's mp3 player by all good natures of the word. The firmware updates are fewquent and feature packed. The build quality is excellent being all aluminum brushed in black.

    Just a heads up for people asking "Does it support Ogg".

    1. Re:Mp3's for summer by mdecarle · · Score: 1

      I posted a Ask Slashdot article a couple of days ago, but it was rejected, that I'ld have liked your comment on.

      I am today thinking about buying a portable MP3 player, which I need to have at least 20Gb, voice recording and a car adapter. I only need MP3. And a screen, so I can choose what to play.

    2. Re:Mp3's for summer by dangitman · · Score: 1

      20GB iPod + Voice recording adapter (like Griffin iTalk or other brands)

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  43. Re:widescreen? by mboverload · · Score: 1

    I was refering to SIZE not ratio.

  44. Why don't we see video cameras with HDDs? by gsasha · · Score: 1

    This neat Archos toy surely demonstrates the feasibility of HDD video recording. The price is a bit high (could as much as double the camera price), but will probably come down significantly since video cams are produced in SO larger quantities.

    1. Re:Why don't we see video cameras with HDDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure where you've been hiding, but they have been in the stores for a while now. Read the press release from JVC, or go straight to the product page.

  45. Re:widescreen? by TERdON · · Score: 1

    Size? Than you're speaking about bigscreens et al? "Widescreen" only has to do with the width/height-ratio - a widescreen is a screen that is significantly wider than it's high.

    --
    I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  46. better than laptop by Charbax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How come 75% of the posts in here say that it's better to buy a laptop.

    The Archos Pma430 is 600$, just search it on froogle.

    Archos has a deal with Echostar in US to market all their Gmini400, AV400 and AV700 in special packages, maybe rebranded as PocketDish. This is interesting because Echostar will probably give away this portable video player/recorder just for getting new customers over from the DirecTV/Tivo users.

    The Archos players are approximately same price as an iPod anyways, so stop saying that it's better to have a laptop, then you should say that the iPod is the same price as a laptop, and then anyways all Archos devices are much cooler than iPods.

    Specially the Pma430 which is a fully hackable Linux embarqued with touch-screen, wifi, usb-host and still has all the portable video recorder/player full DivX compatibillity (dvd-resolution simple profile + b-frames + vbr-mp3)

    1. Re:better than laptop by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      Even $600 is too much for me... personally, I had to budget heavily for a few months to be able to get a PSP for myself and my 11 yr. old son w/ a few games each and a 1/2 gb mem card which all told STILL didn't approach the cost of this unit alone! I don't begrudge anybody w/ the discretionary income, but for "Joe Average", they may as well be priced at $5,000.... they'll never have mass appeal at $600+. BTW, I will be the 1st to say that iPod photo is sold at an insultingly high price as well for a STUPID feature. I bought the 2nd gen iPod mini and find it MORE than adequate. I find these so-called high-end models a solution in search of a problem at best and a plan to seperate cash from those which have more of it than brains at worst.

  47. Re:HDTV support? You're joking, right? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    HDTV has resolutions greater than 720 x 1080 scan lines. We're talking about some 480 x 234 on this device. This DVR doesn't comes anywhere close to HD.

    Additionally, to get hi-def out you need component cables. Component cables (high-quality ones in particular) are thick and bulky to reduce interference and signal loss. One set of decent component cables would probably weigh more than this device.

    Honestly, if you want a portable HD setup you might as well go out and buy a new laptop with a nice, big screen.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  48. Uh, yes, it IS widescreen by definition. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Excuse me? This unit gives a screen aspect ratio of 2.05:1. This is about 15% wider than widescreen TVs, which have an aspect ratio of 16:9 or roughly 1.78:1. So, it is not "somehow" widescreen -- it is widescreen. Whoever modded you as "insightful" needs to be modded "-1 clueless".

    Oh, great. Now this unit will give the anti-widescreen crowd a reason to bitch about why 16:9 movies have the black bars in the sides. Wonderful. :)

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  49. So close, yet so far. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Informative

    "One significant problem that we found in our reviews of their players is that most movie files available online are in formats not readable by the Archos, requiring them to be laboriously converted before they could play on their devices."

    If Archos would like to expand its marketshare (and survive the onslaught by Sony and, eventually Apple), they need to address this fundamental flaw with their PMP line of players.

  50. seems worse than existing Archos AV4100 by kpfleger · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone want this new model instead of the existing Archos AV4100:
    http://www.archos.com/products/prw_500697_specs.ht ml
    which also has 100GB, is similarly priced, also records from TV, is smaller, weighs less, and has better resolution:
    "DVD playback is full DVD resolution up to 704x480; recording is standard TV resolution, up to 512x384 (SVCD)." according to:
    http://www.photographyblog.com/index.php/weblog/co mments/archos_av4100_portable_video_recorder_playe r_announced/

    The only advantage of the new 700 model seems to be that the screen is bigger, but the price is size and weight that make it significantly less appropriate to also use as an mp3 audio device.

  51. Re:Bad Size...for you perhaps by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    Actually, I disagree. Many people have to deal with hour-long (or more) train rides to or from work. When I was visiting England last year, it took over an hour to get from London to Slough, which is only about 30 miles or so outside of London. I would have LOVED to watch something like "Monty Python" while in the train. That device is not small, especially when compared to things like USB MP3 players, but it's certainly small enough to fit in a briefcase or perhaps even a belt pouch of some type. During colder months, it could easily fit in a coat's inner pocket.

    No matter how you look at it, it's a better alternative than lugging around a laptop if you want to watch video instead of just listen to music.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  52. Bose and high end are mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bose makes garbage products and pawns them off on the uniformed via spending more on marketing than every other audio company in the world combined.

    Most of their products won't reproduce sound above 13khz and those Tri-ports are the worst headphones you can buy, seriously, a good pair of $50-$100 Grado or Sennheiser headphones have far superior sound quality.

  53. mnb Re:DVD features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly what I said.
    MP4 is the container - MPEG4 is the video format within it.

    Just because the MPEG4 standard specifies a container doesn't mean that the container and the codec are one and the same.

  54. pixels vs. size and DivX support by Charbax · · Score: 1

    pixels don't matter for it to be a widescreen or not a widescreen.. Pixels can be wide pixels, so for this device to be widescreen or not is all about the size of the screen, width should be 16/9th of height, no matter pixels. The pixels here are just that resolution detail the screen can show, though any video up to DVD resolution + b-frames + vbr-mp3 work fine, and will just be processed down to the 400 something pixels, which is more than very heigh and ample enough resolution even on a 7inch screen, which probably is for a fantastic portable video experience. mp3newwire don't know 100% what they are talking about when they say Archos devices are not compatible with pirated DivX movies. I think probably 70% of DivX and XviD will work fine on Gmini400, AV400, AV700 and even more video shall work on the Pma430 once more codecs are added since the Software development kit has just been released. Only DivX with qpel and cmg won't work (anyways only idiots encode their DivX with those advanced mpeg-4 features. AC3 audio won't work (I think this could be fixed in future firmware upgrade) neigther does ogg vorbis audio work in video (might require too much processing power to hope for it in firmware upgrade). DivX 3.11 doesn't work eigther and 3-point b-frames which some people encode their XviD with won't work for now.. Basically people encode their DivX movies in hundreds of different ways, you cannot expect a portable DivX player to play all of it, not yet anyways. And I am quite sure you cannot find any other company than Archos supporting b-frames and vbr-mp3 in dvd-resolution mpeg-4 AVI.

  55. Content by el_womble · · Score: 1

    The opening paragraph ircked me. I really don't believe that when Steve Jobs was talking about there being no content that he was talking about paid content. Most people use computers to maintain a library of their digital photos and music. Both of those applications have obvious mobile markets too. People take albums (both music and photo) to other people houses and have carried photos in wallets, and music on tape etc for years. Digital libraries of music and photos existed long before MP3 players and iPod photo.

    Most people do not use their computers to store their DVDs. There is simply no advantage. DivX and MP4 is a noticably lower quality, in most instances you have to watch the video at your computer, and even by modern storage standards they take up a significant percentage of your harddisk. Also, it is a truely time consuming task. A full rip, strip, and encode is not only technically challenging for Joe Sixpack it takes the best part of 24 hours (for h.264) per disk.

    The upshot of this is that you and I may have video content on our harddrives, but most people just don't. Even if they did, how many people actually want to be seen using a video player in the street? We're already being told to hide our ear buds for fear of getting mugged, and its dangerous to walk/drive whilst concentrating on video content.

    I'm not saying that there isn't a market. I'm just saying its tiny. By the time Joe Sixpack is really demanding this technology over portable DVD players, laptops will be small enough and cheap enough to make a mass product unnecessary.

    Even if Apple start to sell movies / TV on ITMS, I still don't think that they will release a iVid or iPod Video as the market is big enough with desktop and laptops. I could see apple producing a small box that connects to a network and allows you to watch network content like the XBox with XBMC - hope fully with the same form factor as the Airport and a bluetooth remote control.

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  56. Moderators are stupid fucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a mod waste a mod point on a Score 0 anonymous coward that was anything other than a racist/gay/? baiting troll.

    Metamod moderator of parent as complete fuckwit.

  57. Mod parent up insightful, grandparent down:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent is not a troll. Parent is insightful.

    Grandparent is fucking stupid.

  58. My first OGG player: $70 by endoplasmicMessenger · · Score: 1
    Well, I just received my first OGG player. I've never had a music player before so I don't have anything to compare it with. But I'm pleased with it.

    Plugging the USP plug into my Xandros Linux system caused the file manager to come up automatically. I could just drag .ogg files into the MUSIC folder and they became visible to the player.

    It has a built-in microphone so you can directly record audio (in MP3 format). It also has a line input so that you can record audio from another source. It even has an FM receiver that works very well.

    I was impressed with the complement of cables that came with it: USB extender cable, line input cable, ear buds, and also a lanyard and belt adapter.

    I have a 512M model. According to the manual, there is also a 1G model, but I didn't know about it before I ordered.

    Plugging it into the USB port charges the batteries. I haven't used it enough to have a sense of how long the built-in battery lasts. I used it for several hours today without any problems.

    So far I'm very pleased with this unit and I am very happy to support companies which support OGG.

    FYI: iOPS F350 512MB MP3/FM Digital Audio Player

    --
    Evolution is a fact. Darwinism is a joke.
  59. Some people already have a notebook by dirkstoop · · Score: 1

    Well, for those amongst us who already own a stack of notebooks it's a relief to have something else to spend money on. ;-)

    Besides: if all you want to do on the road is watch movies the form factor is probably worth it (if you can stand such a small screen). I notice a really big difference in portability between my 12" and 15" powerbooks and as a consequence they both serve different tasks and get taken along on different occasions. So I can surely imagine that the difference between a 12" form-factor notebook and this device is at least as hefty.

    The only thing I don't grok about this thing is that you're supposed to leave it at home to record tv-shows, while you're also supposed to take it with you to watch recorded stuff. That's extremely unpractical and therefore a fundamental design flaw. If I had one it would probably be retired in a drawer after a few months of agony fighting myself over wether to take it or leave it every time I leave the house.

    --
    (may read 'IMHO' wherever omitted from above text)
  60. I tell my 11 yr old daughter she can have by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    an mp3 player for 6th grade graduation present, and we go thru the sunday paper adds, and look on line and the result...the ipod has games and comes in neat colors, end of story.. I don't think the even heard my comment that having an AA battery, as opposed to a sealed internal proprietary, is a good idea..

    1. Re:I tell my 11 yr old daughter she can have by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      "I don't think the even heard my comment that having an AA battery, as opposed to a sealed internal proprietary, is a good idea.."

      That is the single most important thing to me...And also the biggest surprise as to why iPods were the "chosen ones". I have an old Archos 20GB jukebox that runs from 4 AA's that I have used so much over the last few years that I am sure any internal battery would have long since bitten the dust. (My total cost for battery upkeep has been about $30 bucks for a charger with 4 extra batteries that I used to replace the ones that came with the device about 2 years into it's lifecycle).

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  61. Re:widescreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah and don't tell her that the /. mods are a bunch of clueless morons. "Troll" for the parent? oy, vey. Some mods really are just wastes of skin.

  62. Re:Mp3's for summer [Off-Topic] by Lifewolf · · Score: 1

    I posted a Ask Slashdot article a couple of days ago, but it was rejected, that I'ld have liked your comment on.

    I am today thinking about buying a portable MP3 player, which I need to have at least 20Gb, voice recording and a car adapter. I only need MP3. And a screen, so I can choose what to play.

    Try visiting dapreview.net and posting in the "Which DAP to buy?" forum.

    --
    "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
  63. Codecs? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Can it handle the latest divx and xvid video files that might come freshly downloaded off of mininova?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  64. Re:Bad Size...wrong by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    I couldn't disagree more. I'm not sure about the size overall but I think this is the start of a video revolution. If the cards play right, this might lead to the downfall one of the big music companies.

    As more stuff like this comes out people will be asking "why doesn't this come with video". People will ask that all music come with video and probably on DVD's. The music companies will greet with the same fanfare they gave mp3's and this will piss people off. Then people will figure out they could make their OWN videos to songs they like with something like Flash or Video cameras, and some will start repackaging songs into video competing (illegaly) with the big companies. This will catch on and most likely Apple will get tired of dealing with the music companies and get in the game themselves. They will become a music label as well as a distributor. Then they will they put out a mandate that all songs produced by their artists have to come with a video, even if cheap an simple. They will sell on DVD or electronically and it will start to catch on, kicking the big music people in the nads. Eventually Apples competitors will try to do the same Real, Yahoo, M$, and all the various pay to download music places.

    Add this in with where all the other places people will be getting used to video (vidoe voip/skype, video for cellphone calls, possible podcasting of tv for things like Tivo, etc...). A lot is coming and these little devices will play nicely into that revolution.

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  65. Re:Off-topic: World Community Grid by ViktorsB · · Score: 1

    Some of the proteins being processed the last couple of weeks have been unusually difficult to fold. The average run time should be between 10 and 20 hours. However, because of the unpredictable variability, the times can range anywhere from 2 hours to over 200 hours, occasionally.