Slashdot Mirror


New Star Wars Movie From the Makers of 'Troops'

Anonymous Coward writes "A new fan-made Star Wars production is underway from the creators of the well-known 1997 Star Wars spoof 'Troops'. I.M.P.S. - The Relentless is a documentary style feature following the crew and missions of an Imperial Star Destroyer during the height of the Galactic Empire. While slightly more serious than Troops, the first available chapter of I.M.P.S is an exceptionally well-produced (and still subtly humorous) piece of fanfilm. Worth it for the incredible CGI alone."

218 comments

  1. Mirrors? by kyle90 · · Score: 1

    Not even any replies yet, and it already seems to be slashdotted...

    --
    Real_men_don't_need_spacebars.
    1. Re:Mirrors? by isolationism · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know it's a robust server when the editors slashdot the site before it's even posted.

    2. Re:Mirrors? by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      Forget mirrors, we need torrents!

    3. Re:Mirrors? by SkunkPussy · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    4. Re:Mirrors? by pasamio · · Score: 1

      Try this. Original links back to the already dead page, but there are a few others that appear not to. http://impstherelentless.com/tek9.asp?pg=chapter1_ download

      --
      I always wondered where this setting was...
    5. Re:Mirrors? by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Don't be too proud of this technological server you've created. It is nothing when comared to the power of the Slashdot!

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    6. Re:Mirrors? by TheBurningDog · · Score: 1

      I can load the page, but I can't load the torrent file... anybody have a torrent for the torrent?

    7. Re:Mirrors? by spicydragonz · · Score: 1

      If you have trouble getting the bittorrent from their site use this link http://isohunt.com/torrents.php?ihq=imps&ext=&op=a nd

    8. Re:Mirrors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work for the guy who sold the software that powered that site.

      I couldn't withstand a small email forwarding, let alone a slashdotting.

      He was a moron "programmer" besides being a filthy liar who stole from me.

    9. Re:Mirrors? by tylernt · · Score: 1

      That link works for me, thanks!

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    10. Re:Mirrors? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Forget torrents we need mirrors!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  2. pwned by Darren+Foong · · Score: 1

    "Service Unavailable" Should apply some anti-Slashdot-effect systems, them. And I can't watch that film anymore!!!1

  3. The site's already unavailable by VikingBerserker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Curse my metal body, I wasn't fast enough!

    1. Re:The site's already unavailable by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Listen to the servers R2, they're dying.

    2. Re:The site's already unavailable by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Shut down all the Slashdotters on the detention level!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. Like the Jedi... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    vanished! ;)

  5. Must be a good one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no comments and already slashdotted. `course, must be all those subscribed to the slash, no?

    frosty from anomalous colored?

  6. Yep, down by headchimp · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yep, seems to be slashdotted, this might take a while

  7. Even the torrent is fubared by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could someone create a torrent of the torrent?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Even the torrent is fubared by Kalak · · Score: 4, Informative

      For those who don't want to deal with trackerless torrents/ /Magnet URIs, etc. (see above), which are faster...

      This torrent below will give you a smaller torrent, so a slower download - you have been warned:

      One torrent of the torrent:
      http://www.iddl.vt.edu/~jackie/imps_chapter1_DAVEN PORT_928735.avi.torrent

      And may /. have mercy on my tracker.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    2. Re:Even the torrent is fubared by yotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      may /. have mercy on my tracker.

      May it indeed, yours is the first tracker that's worked. And the download is not slower, becasue you can't get slower than 0kibs.

    3. Re:Even the torrent is fubared by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm a bit ignorant of BitTorrent... What does "smaller torrent" mean? Doesn't that depend on how many people participate? I'd think posting the only working torrent link on Slashdot would be a good way to make sure you get lots of participants in a hurry.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    4. Re:Even the torrent is fubared by XaXXon · · Score: 1

      I've started up a high-upload-rate connection against the torrent you provided. As soon as it gets some data, it should be pushing 2-3MB/s, so people should be able to get their copy reasonably quick.

    5. Re:Even the torrent is fubared by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Informative

      .torrent files contain a list of hashes for the pieces of a torrent. If you have lots of pieces, you need a big .torrent file to describe them all. Lots of pieces usually results in faster and more reliable downloads.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    6. Re:Even the torrent is fubared by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      Ah. Thanks.

      I also just went and read the docs on BitTorrent so I won't ask dumb questions in the future.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  8. IMPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the newsest IMPS was well done but it just didnt do the same for me as the original Cops parody called Troops.

  9. Its available on theforce.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    1. Re:Its available on theforce.net by Comsn · · Score: 1

      the movie links back to imps server ;\

  10. Or check here... by redmo · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    If you're tired, sleep! Wenn Sie muede sind, schlafen!
    1. Re:Or check here... by FroBugg · · Score: 1

      That's great if you just want the teaser, but for the actual movie that page links back to the dead server.

  11. Torrent here by idonthack · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    1. Re:Torrent here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you mean 'you're welcome' the torrent is on the front page in that link, all one has to do is click the link.

    2. Re:Torrent here by Kalak · · Score: 1

      The tracker keeps timing out, but keep trying. Azerus does this automatically, and the swarm is going fine.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    3. Re:Torrent here by neonstz · · Score: 1

      The page linked to in the story was unavailable for a while.

    4. Re:Torrent here by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      The force is strong with this Torrent...

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    5. Re:Torrent here by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 1

      It's showing no peers right now. No activity at all.

      --
      - -
      Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    6. Re:Torrent here by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      I've been at this for a half hour, and all I get are timeouts before I can download a single byte. I don't use BT much. Am I doing something wrong?

    7. Re:Torrent here by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, you're doing it right.

    8. Re:Torrent here by acariquara · · Score: 2, Informative

      Damn, the trackerless feature of Azureus 2.3.x is working wonders with this one. No contact w/ the server whatsoever and the torrent is capping my 1meg DSL...

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    9. Re:Torrent here by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Like the other said, you dont do anything wrong.
      The site is only currently REALLY bombed, but your client will check every x minutes, and as soon as the site is up again it will start. Just run it in the background, as long as it cant connect to the tracker it will use hardly any bandwith.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    10. Re:Torrent here by onepoint · · Score: 1

      Amazing is it not. works every time. Keeping this share up for a while, seems that everyone needs help today.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    11. Re:Torrent here by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I find that switching on the distributed database causes a cosmic buttload of ICMP host/port unreachable packets coming back, and I hate to think about how many people I'm pestering who picked up an IP address after someone else got it dirty and dropped it.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    12. Re:Torrent here by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

      Wasn't torrentreactor.net taken over by scammers?

      I thought the original torrentreactor was now at torrentreactor.to

    13. Re:Torrent here by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Re-Trackered.

      Same torrent, with new trackers added.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  12. Hey hey hey! by varmittang · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another ASP bites the dust!

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  13. FileFront download link by PSVMOrnot · · Score: 3, Informative

    it's not a torrent, and its not a mirror, but it's the best i could grab at the time:
    http://download.filefront.com/3857087;2ee21ce8850b c08599a3d844a47485bf1274714926a230d06c1d5d8c48f3e5 41f450d9474875fa80

    1. Re:FileFront download link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      250 kps via HTTP on filefont....timeouts or 1 kps via BT.

      Go go Bittorrent! And people wonder why so many can't stand it.

  14. incredible cgi! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 0, Troll

    "We hooked Jedi Knight up to a VCR through the video-out on an old 386. Check out the INCREDIBLE results!"

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  15. Props from the director by gcauthon · · Score: 1

    http://www.theforce.net/fanfilms/shortfilms/imps/d irector.asp

    From the director:
    a more serious documentary in the style of a History Channel Program

    This should be great, lol!

  16. Service Unavailable. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God, no matter what time it is, no matter what day, no matter what year, I'll never be able to beat the fucking rush!
    I hate you all.

    1. Re:Service Unavailable. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kikikikikikiki!

  17. well known ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    well known to whom ? how is a niche, home made fan film "well known" ?

    "well known" or "notoriety" is entirely subjective, i have never heard of this film/home-movie and i suspect if you stop someone in the street and ask them the same they haven't heard of it either

    some people really need to get back to reality once in a while

    1. Re:well known ? by empaler · · Score: 1

      Stop whining. Everyone but you knows it.

    2. Re:well known ? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "well known" or "notoriety" is entirely subjective. . .

      Well of course it is. I've had to make this very point any number of times myself when people have sought to claim that I either wasn't, or was, "famous."

      Certainly any number of people, quite possibly in the millions, have seen my name and image in the traditional media and it isn't unheard of for complete strangers to walk up to me and say, "Oh, Hey, you're ". . ." aren't you?" God only knows how many people only recognize me by sight.

      While browsing the web I've been startled to find pictures of myself I hadn't even known had been taken, being quoted in webzines, and even as an attributed, by full name, sig.

      In certain niche fields I have even been branded a "legend" by some.

      And yet "nobody" has ever heard of me. I'm probably most "notorious" right now right here on Slashdot (I've spent the past 5 years or so actively seeking to keep my name out of the traditional press. It's in all the local papers right now anyway) Of the thousands of people who have read my posts I'd hazard you couldn't find ten who would recognize my name or image.

      It's a funny world we live in these days. You can be known to millions and unheard of, at the same time. I am and am not "well known" depending upon the context of the phrase.

      Ask any random person on the street if they know who Einstein was and you'll likely get the answer, "Yes."

      Ask the same person if they know who Bertrand Russell was and you'll likely get the answer, "No," but you can find his entry in even the most pathetically bad general encyclopedia.

      We've had to invent a phrase to indicate "noteriety" that goes beyond mere "fame":

      Household Word

      And yet you'll find households that have not heard of even Einstein.

      In my city of 60,000 you'd be hard pressed to find someone who hasn't heard of Michael Jordan; and equally hard pressed to find one who has heard of David Beckham.

      Would you posit, because of this, that David Beckham isn't "well known?"

      some people really need to get back to reality once in a while

      Exactly. You are, like it or not, a mere data point in the statistical phenomenon of "well known," not its measure.

      KFG

    3. Re:well known ? by Roland+Piguepaille · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So I see you post on /., but what's your claim to fame?

      --
      To confirm you're not a script, please piss in my ear.
    4. Re:well known ? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Well, they did get Peter Cullen to do the narration, so that's gotta count for something.

    5. Re:well known ? by johnjaydk · · Score: 1
      Well, they did get Peter Cullen [imdb.com] to do the narration, so that's gotta count for something

      According to imdb it's allmost the only non-pooh film he's done for the last teen years.

      --
      TCAP-Abort
    6. Re:well known ? by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .what's your claim to fame?

      Ah, I see I failed to make it explicit that when people try to make the claim that I am famous I deny it.

      Someone like David Beckham can point to a single thing for which he is known. I cannot, unless it is the raw tendency to attract notice with a hefty helping of pure circumstance to as low a level as my genetic structure. Whatever noteriety I have is built Lego fashion from many smaller sources, some of which have been completely beyond my control.

      I understand that some people desire fame and even seek it, usually failing.

      I find the entire concept distasteful in the extreme and seek to avoid it, but it follows me around, often through no merit of my own. Life doesn't seem to be fair. I have rejected numerous requests to publish a website, newsletter, blog, dead tree autobiography.

      But I was not born into independent wealth and a girl's got to make a living. Maybe it's the fishnet stockings.

      KFG

    7. Re:well known ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, 6,600 posts? you need a life

    8. Re:well known ? by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I'm immensely curious to know who you are. But I have a feeling you won't enlighten me.

      This isn't flattery, but a sincere compliment: I think you are the most fascinating person on slashdot. It's obvious you have wide and varied education and experience -- something the normal person doesn't have. I like to look outside the norms of life, as that is where real excitement and achievement occurs. You inspire me, and I'm wondering what you did to reach the place you are at now. This is not the first name I've friended you on... I've been reading your comments for a couple years off and on.

      --
      Be relentless!
    9. Re:well known ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I'm immensely curious to know who you are. But I have a feeling you won't enlighten me.

      This isn't flattery, but a sincere compliment: I think you are the most fascinating person on slashdot. It's obvious you have wide and varied education and experience -- something the normal person doesn't have. I like to look outside the norms of life, as that is where real excitement and achievement occurs. You inspire me, and I'm wondering what you did to reach the place you are at now. This is not the first name I've friended you on... I've been reading your comments for a couple years off and on."

      Yeah right. It was the fish-net stockings remark that "inspired" you wasn't it? ;)

    10. Re:well known ? by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      LMAO. Actually, I am definitely a big fan of those, but no, I am genuinely interested in KFG's story.

      --
      Be relentless!
    11. Re:well known ? by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Informative

      Considering that he's been doing voice work for 40 years, I think he's earned the right to take it easy these days. He did voices in most of the well-known action cartoons in the 80s (he was Optimus Prime, for example), so it's not like he's a nobody.

      I mean, sure, I'd be even more impressed if they got Frank Welker on board, but his voice doesn't have that resonating quality that Cullen's voice has.

    12. Re:well known ? by Digital+Autumn · · Score: 1

      He did voices in most of the well-known action cartoons in the 80s (he was Optimus Prime, for example), so it's not like he's a nobody. Oh that's rich. I must be on Slashdot.

    13. Re:well known ? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      I'm immensely curious to know who you are. But I have a feeling you won't enlighten me.

      I think I've got it figured out, depending on whether or not KFG is from Chapel Hill.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    14. Re:well known ? by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Ah well, it doesn't realy matter. It would be neat to know, but I'm certainly not going to spend too much effort tracking KFG down ;)

      --
      Be relentless!
    15. Re:well known ? by bsdnode · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Fame is like a skin disease, I guess. People makes judgments before you even open your mouth. They have preconceived ideas of who you are, how you live, what you like, etc. It's fun when it is at a very small scale, but I would not like at all being known by _millions_ of people who would/could talk to me while I walk in the streets and, the worse in my mind, talk _about_ me all the time. And there is the dark side of it: the stalkers. I guess the rich and famous lose something that we all take for granted: their anonymity. Some of them are almost raped out of it. The star children for example... I salute you, and I salute your efforts of trying to be one of us ordinary people again.

    16. Re:well known ? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      He did voices in most of the well-known action cartoons in the 80s (he was Optimus Prime, for example), so it's not like he's a nobody.

      He still seems to do a lot of narration for big-budget films and games (Warcraft III's trailers, I remember in particular).

      Definitely one of the coolest male voices ever. I was shocked when I realized that Black Sheep really had gotten ahold of him for this.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    17. Re:well known ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd also like to give a nod to Andy Garfield, the person responsible for the music and sound. While he's not the most recognized name he has done professional work on a number of shows. This is a movie that benefits greatly from the music.

    18. Re:well known ? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Ah well, it doesn't realy matter. It would be neat to know, but I'm certainly not going to spend too much effort tracking KFG down ;)

      Yeah, I suppose that at some point you are no longer "just curious", you are stalking. :)

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    19. Re:well known ? by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And you do have to respect a person's right to privacy. Rights are something I am working at dedicating my life to.

      --
      Be relentless!
    20. Re:well known ? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      And what, you think Justin Timberlake being cast in Shrek 3 because he's boning Cameron Diaz is a good thing? People need to start giving props for talent, instead of fellating people whose only claim to fame is that they are famous.

  18. filefront mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  19. Call me when the Reno 911 people do a Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could restore some much needed sobriety to this now lame ass franchise.

  20. Great Movie! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What an intense movie! Although a bit short for a movie, I don't understand why the credits ends with "SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE". Who is this "AVAILABLE" fellow and what did he had to do with the movie?

    1. Re:Great Movie! by jspoon · · Score: 1
      What an intense movie! Although a bit short for a movie, I don't understand why the credits ends with "SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE". Who is this "AVAILABLE" fellow and what did he had to do with the movie?

      It's Lando, before Darth Vader murdered his family causing him to vow revenge. Unfortunately he suffered an electric shock while working on the Millennium Falcon and forgot all about that. And his name.

    2. Re:Great Movie! by SamSim · · Score: 1

      What I like best about this movie is the way its brevity makes it open to interpretation and sparks the imagination. The real movie is in the details you yourself supply. "Available" can be anyone you want him/her to be, though personally I hold the opinion that "Available" is you, the viewer.

    3. Re:Great Movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Service not Available" is obviously yoda-speak ("speak backwards I do").

      He means that you shouldn't serve "Available", who is obviously the latest and most powerful of the sith lords.

    4. Re:Great Movie! by zonker · · Score: 0

      dunno if anyone else noticed who the narator is...

      it's none other than peter cullen, voice of the transformers optimus prime amongst many other cartoons and movies. :)

  21. At first I misread it as 'Star Troopers' by marat · · Score: 1

    I mean new Star Wars are bad, but still can be made considerably worse.

    I brought 'Star Troopers' to friends without watching it myself before, and I were constantly telling them I were thinking this parody will turn into a real drama real soon now (because it created some associations with the beginning of 'My Enemy'). Only because of this friends (and me) watched it to the end, then they were really angry as if it was me who shoot so braindamaged movie and spent all the budget on building usual hype.

    1. Re:At first I misread it as 'Star Troopers' by TiberSeptm · · Score: 1

      hmm?

    2. Re:At first I misread it as 'Star Troopers' by infolib · · Score: 1
      It's a hilarious flick. If you didn't catch that the extreme clichéness is purposeful you're watching too many bad movies. Mediiic!!

      Oh, btw you misspelled "Starship Troopers".

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    3. Re:At first I misread it as 'Star Troopers' by martalli · · Score: 1

      Now that we are drifting off topic so early, I thought Star Troopers was horrible the first time...but now I think it's downright hilarious. It's a grade 'a' B movie!

    4. Re:At first I misread it as 'Star Troopers' by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      It's a grade 'a' B movie! I think you mistyped "It's a high budget bad grade B movie".

  22. Re:I sense a disturbance in the web by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    No wonder Anakian felt so helpless and turned to the dark side of the Force.

  23. Torrent by sammykrupa · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope that server's down too.

  24. Top quality by greenlead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I downloaded the trailer and the first chapter a couple of weeks ago. They are top quality, and a must-see. I am anxiously awaiting chpater 2, and I'm not even that much of a Star Wars fan.

    1. Re:Top quality by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      One might argue that you are anxiously awaiting Chapter 2 because you are not even that much of a Star Wars fan.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  25. Working torrent? by yotto · · Score: 1

    Somebody post a working torrent ASAP! These really bad jokes using classic Star Wars lines are making me want to rip my eyes out!

    Oh, and for the record, Han will get that torrent up, we've just got to give him more time.

    1. Re:Working torrent? by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's no torrent! It's a... Oh, nevermind >:(

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    2. Re:Working torrent? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Your faith in your friends is your weakness.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Working torrent? by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      These really bad jokes using classic Star Wars lines are making me want to rip my eyes out!

      Then you might not want to watch the movie. They use one.

    4. Re:Working torrent? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It'd only be truely classic "rip your eyes out" stuff if it had turned out that Luke had killed his father and married his mother.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Working torrent? by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

      These really bad jokes using classic Star Wars lines are making me want to rip my eyes out!

      They said they fixed it! It's not my fault!

    6. Re:Working torrent? by Aspasia13 · · Score: 1

      It'd only be truely classic "rip your eyes out" stuff if it had turned out that Luke had killed his father and married his mother.

      Well, he helped kill his father, and he DID kiss his sister (TWICE in fact). Does that count?

  26. CGI alone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worth it for the incredible CGI alone.

    Isn't that what Lucas was banking on?

  27. Magnet URI below...tracker down by Danathar · · Score: 2, Informative

    The tracker for part 1 of the avi is down...so here is the Magnet URI for use in Azureus to access the swarm "trackerless"

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:RDFJDRRUQXGXPZBH7BCFXGRPGKAC VJ FR

    1. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1
      The tracker for part 1 of the avi is down...so here is the Magnet URI for use in Azureus to access the swarm "trackerless"
      Thanks for the magnet URI. I can confirm that this (warning: remove any space added by /.):
      magnet:?xt=urn:btih:RDFJDRRUQXGXPZBH7BCFXGRPGKACVJ FR
      works fine with Azureus 2.3.0.2. You can download the avi even if both the site and the torrent tracker are down!
      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    2. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Is'nt that goofy how /. tends to put a space before the last two characters? (Hey Taco!...fix it!).

      I've posted Magnet URI's before and always kick myself in the ass for forgetting to mention along with the URI that you need to get rid of the space near the end.

      More people should publish Magnet URI's instead of links to torrent files.

    3. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by yotto · · Score: 1

      (Hey Taco!...fix it!)

      Actualy, that /is/ the fixed version. They chop up (almost) everything that's longer than a certain length so us poor 80-columners can read the site without having to scroll sideways.

    4. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by Danathar · · Score: 1

      It would be nice though to be able to specify a tag that keeps it from being choped....I understand your pain but the fix kills the URI.

      Of course one could construe that this weeds out the people who are not smart enough to notice that the space is a problem and needs to be hand fixed before pasting it into Azureus......but I'm a nice person and would rather have it work without having to hand fix it.

    5. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by Chmarr · · Score: 1

      All one has to to is use the proper HTML tags to make the link clickable. So, stop being lazy, and put that little bit of effort in!

    6. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1
      They chop up (almost) everything that's longer than a certain length so us poor 80-columners can read the site without having to scroll sideways.

      Yeah: they insert a space in any word that is longer than 50 chars. But this is annoying for BT magnet URIs that have a fixed length of 52 chars.
      A quick fix of course can be to raise the limit from 50 to 52.

      If anyone is interested in understanding what are these URIs: they are a, more or less, standard compliant way to encode the info hash of a torrent. You can distinguish the bittorrent URIs because they contain the string "urn:btih:".

      It's possible to convert a magnet URI to the classical hex info hash and viceversa with this small Python script: simply pass the URI or the hash to the command line.

      Unfortunately currently they work only in Azureus 2.3+.
      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    7. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by Danathar · · Score: 1

      It's not link....URI's are NOT LINKS..they don't "link" to anything...hence the term URI instead of URL.

    8. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1

      He is not lazy: /. messes up magnet URIs in <a href="..."> really badly!

      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    9. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, according to the W3C you can put any URI in an <a href="...">, not only URLs.

      The real problem is that /. messes up magnet URIs in the <a> elements: "magnet:?xt=urn:btih:AAA..." becomes "magnet:xturnbtihAAA...". :-(
      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    10. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by david.given · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the magnet URI.

      Unfortunately I seem to be unable to figure out what I'm supposed to do with it. I'm running 2.3.0.2 Azureus, and there don't seem to be any obvious options dealing with magnet URIs... the closest is 'open location', and that plain doesn't work.

      What am I missing here?

    11. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by hacker · · Score: 1

      Nope, doesn't work for me either, using B64 from June 19th's snapshot...

    12. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1

      "Open location" is fine: insert the magnet URI in the URL field removing the whitespace before the last two chars.

      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    13. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by david.given · · Score: 1
      "Open location" is fine: insert the magnet URI in the URL field removing the whitespace before the last two chars.

      I tried that; it just says: "Error --- no sources found for torrent" and gives up.

      *shrug*

    14. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1

      Are you sure to have the "Distributed DB" plugin enabled and running? It requires an open UDP port and when everything is fine you should have a green light icon in the statusbar at the bottom of the window.

      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    15. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by hacker · · Score: 1

      Nope, with B64 from 6/19 and 2.3.0.2, with Distributed DB running (and thousands of lines of relevant successful log in that tab), it doesn't fetch a single byte of the distributed torrent file.

      In my case, it sits there at "Downloading from..." (the magnet URI), for about an hour... never gets past it. Other torrents I'm pulling and seeding work fine.

    16. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Actualy, that /is/ the fixed version. They chop up (almost) everything that's longer than a certain length so us poor 80-columners can read the site without having to scroll sideways.

      No, they chop it up because there were jackasses who would intentionally post things that widened the page to a ridiculous degree, breaking line wrapping.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    17. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by yotto · · Score: 1

      No, they chop it up because there were jackasses who would intentionally post things that widened the page to a ridiculous degree, breaking line wrapping.

      Um, you just said the equivalent of "You're wrong, and here's some extra information about what you posted."

      They cut it at all for the benefit of everybody, sure, but they cut it to a number 80 for people like me.

    18. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Um, you just said the equivalent of "You're wrong, and here's some extra information about what you posted."

      I never said you were wrong about where they did the cutting, or why they chose to chop at that point. I said you were wrong about the motivation for the code in the first place. They didn't put the code in for hugs and bunnies from people using 80 column text browsers.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    19. Re:Magnet URI below...tracker down by dave1g · · Score: 1

      holy shit, that worked really well. connected me to 70 seeds in a minute. even wihtout the tracker, yay for distributed tracker! :-)

  28. Don't bother here's the spoiler by lobsterGun · · Score: 0, Troll


    its just a long series of shots of a storm trooper putting on his body armor followed by a couple of quick cuts of storm troopers standing around in various environments (snow, desert etc.).

    Its not worth downloading

    1. Re:Don't bother here's the spoiler by irving47 · · Score: 1

      troll

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    2. Re:Don't bother here's the spoiler by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      breathless fanboi.

  29. They're using Filefront by ChronoReverse · · Score: 1

    http://files.filefront.com/IMPS___The_RelentlessCh apter1;3857087;/fileinfo.html A gazillion empty servers here ready to meet even the challenge of Slashdot

    1. Re:They're using Filefront by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, I'm pulling it off FileFront at 492KB/Sec right now.

    2. Re:They're using Filefront by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You bastard. And here I thought my 362 KB/sec was impressive. Damn damn damn.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  30. Or check here...Damaged Redundency. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "That's great if you just want the teaser, but for the actual movie that page links back to the dead server."

    The downside of the internet. Kind of hard to "route around damage" when the linking nature of the internet removes most of the redundancy.

    1. Re:Or check here...Damaged Redundency. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The old ARPA internet that would function even if 90% of its nodes were destroyed by a Soviet nuclear attack is a thing of the past.

      The modern internet has nothing like the old redundancy. Go check out NANOG and listen to them bitching about it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Or check here...Damaged Redundency. by frankmu · · Score: 1

      if the soviets only knew about spam and porn, we'd all be speaking russian now.

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  31. Torrentless donload by Nehle · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of us who can't use bittorrent:
    FileFront

  32. Obligatory by sp3tt · · Score: 0

    Noooooooooooooooooooooo!

    Anti-lameness filter: "Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted."

  33. Already fixed by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    Is'nt that goofy how /. tends to put a space before the last two characters? (Hey Taco!...fix it!).
    As you can see, this has already been fixed by the /. crack programming squad.
    --
    Yeah, right.
  34. Nah..use Magnet URI by Danathar · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you have azureus...just juse the Magnet URI

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:RDFJDRRUQXGXPZBH7BCFXGRPGKAC VJ FR

    Note...slashdot puts a space before the last two characters..so when pasting the URI into Azureus (latest version) with "open location" be sure to omit the space.

    AND...be sure you have trackerless BT plugin enabled! (when starting up Azureus it takes a couple of min to integrate into the DHT network)

    1. Re:Nah..use Magnet URI by modecx · · Score: 1

      It's working for me, but it's going miserably slow. 9 seeds, 49 peers, 1-2kbps. This is the first time I've used trackerless BT, so it'll be interesting.

      At least the swarm speed has picked up from 220kBps to 1MBps. That's a good sign!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    2. Re:Nah..use Magnet URI by endoplasmicMessenger · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I've used the new Azureus. The 'swarm' view it totally cool.

      --
      Evolution is a fact. Darwinism is a joke.
    3. Re:Nah..use Magnet URI by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Yea..the swam is pretty slow at the moment..hopefully more people with good connections will join once they figure out how to use the Magnet URI to access the swarm

    4. Re:Nah..use Magnet URI by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it takes a while for the swarm to find new peers -- I've never had to use this feature before, and it's totally cool! Now things are flying along as fast as any trackered torrent.

      I didn't even use the Magnet URI though -- I simply loaded the torrent file from torrentreactor.

      --
      Be relentless!
    5. Re:Nah..use Magnet URI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The occasional person likes to complain about Slashdoters but even they can't argue how easy it is to find useful information here. Last I checked I was at 156 K (and climbing) using Azereus 2.3.0.2. and the magnet URI.

      Thanks... and bravo again Slashdot.

      BTW -up to 171K.

    6. Re:Nah..use Magnet URI by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was pretty cool. I left for pretty much the whole day, and I come back to a finished download and a 4:1 transmit:receive ratio. It must've really picked up in speed. Awesome feature, because a typical torrent probably would've crumbled.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  35. MOD PARENT UP by tulare · · Score: 1

    Worked a charm for me. Do you have a link describing the magnet: protocol and how you managed to get this information on the torrent?

    Behold another legitimate use of bittorrent, and MPAA can suck a nut.

    --
    political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Danathar · · Score: 4, Informative

      One of the original posts had a posting to the torrent file on torrentreactor. The file downloaded but the tracker was obviously down.

      In Azureus if you right click on the torrent file under "my torrents" you will see an option at the bottom that says "copy magnet URI to clipboard"

      As for information. I learned about it from wikipedia

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet_link

      It is'nt the best description in the world but there are links at the bottom and within the document that link to better sources of information.

      I find it amazing that more torrent sites don't publish the URI in addition to the torrent file.

      The biggest problem is that people seem to not understand what/how Magnet URI's work in conjunction with Azureus.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by tulare · · Score: 1

      Well thanks. It downloaded, I watched it, it was great.

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  36. I.M.P.S ? don't they mean M.I.P.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I.M.P.S."
    Yeah, I think they spelled MIPS wrong.

  37. torrentspy.com by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Search for Troops there and you'll see a link to a torrent for the new movie in addition to the original Troops (the latter of which is a nearly dead torrent)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  38. A Terrible Movie by jonathanbearak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had trouble finishing the film.

    Most of the movie is CGI of ships, walkers, etc. with a narrator's voice discussing the Empire's army in some sort of documentary that's part poorly written propaganda film and part unemotional and cheap knock-off of COPS.

    Clearly the CGI was a lot of work; it's beyond what I could have done -- but it's hardly spectacular --- and I believe much of the criticism of a certain sci-fi film is how CGI does not a good movie make.

    The acting is poor. Of course, it's hard to express emotion when you don't see a single face throughout the entire movie, save for a few moments at the end, where officers suddenly appear for no apparent reason. The demeanor is off for military personnel, and the whole thing just doesn't come together in the end. Apparently, the crime involved the smuggling of teddy bears and action figures. That's fine for a joke, but not after 20 minutes of tedium.

    I'm sorry but there's nothing to empathize with in this movie. It drags on without purpose, without being sure of its concept at large. The beginning narration feels like it's about to be cut off, and then just keeps going on and on and on. It makes you scream, "Make it stop!"

    I don't think much thought went into this film as far as the story or script are concerned. A very vague idea went in, and some people went to work on their computers. I'd give it half a star out of 5.

    1. Re:A Terrible Movie by Antonymous+Flower · · Score: 1

      this describes the entire star wars franchise fairly accurately. good job

    2. Re:A Terrible Movie by bokmann · · Score: 1

      Oh come on! this is worth watching just for the subtle reference to the Alien and Predator movies!

      The animation is just fresking incredible. I cannot believe what kind of stuff is possible on consumer budgets these days.

    3. Re:A Terrible Movie by polyex · · Score: 1

      Well, you get what you pay for. I was impressed with the effort. For a fan film its pretty amazing. After the first film came out in 1977, I think it was downhill from there, starting with the Holiday Special. George Luca's "vision" would not certainly be the subject I would have chosen to make a movie about. I felt pretty uncomfortable with the level of nerd-dom/fanboy or whatever you want to call it. I kept saying to myself, all this effort is going into something based on someone ELSE'S movie. I have to say I was impressed with the amount of effort that these guys must have put into this movie, and even if the subject matter is fanboy at its height, I take my hat off to them for such an impressive result. You guys slamming it probably have never produced anything outside of your job worth a damn and should STFU.

    4. Re:A Terrible Movie by bokmann · · Score: 1

      I should have finished watching it before I posted that. There are also reference to the original movie ("Arent you a little short for a stormstooper?"), as well as a fantastic prop reference to Pulp Fiction. Makes me wonder what references I'm missing cause I didn't see the original.

    5. Re:A Terrible Movie by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it "terrible", but the script/story was rather dull. It's sad, because the production values were excellent.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    6. Re:A Terrible Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on! this is worth watching just for the subtle reference to the Alien and Predator movies!

      Subtle? SUBTLE? WTF?

    7. Re:A Terrible Movie by DaFork · · Score: 1
      The demeanor is off for military personnel

      I agree with you there. The troopers were way too whiney and relaxed for trained military personnel responding to an incident where there is a potential for loss of life.

      But, the movie was great anyways. Maybe next time they will find a veteran to be a military advisor so they can get that part right.

    8. Re:A Terrible Movie by Dr.+Pickles · · Score: 1

      The Predator reference was pretty fantastic. But aren't the all these Storm Troopers supposed to be clones anyway? That's my gripe w/ this concept.

    9. Re:A Terrible Movie by serutan · · Score: 1

      A very vague idea went in, and some people went to work on their computers.

      So? Sounds like most of the projects I've worked on. If Episode 2 involves contractors getting blamed and fired, we'll be right on track!

    10. Re:A Terrible Movie by Jott42 · · Score: 1

      Stormtroopers supposed to be clones? I do not think that there is any reference to that in EP4-6, so in "classic" SW the answer is no. In "modern" SW, EP1-6, I do care what the answer is. I do not really care for what they have done to the mythology in Ep1-3, and I choose the regard them as "revisionist" tales, marginally interesting but not any source for the "truth" of that mythic universe.

    11. Re:A Terrible Movie by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Seems to me like that's something lacking in basically every fan film, Star Wars, Star Trek and miscellaneous - acting. CGI seems to be easy these days, but a fan film with people in it who aren't just fans, but actually decent actors would be like gold dust. Anybody know any good examples?

    12. Re:A Terrible Movie by annodomini · · Score: 1

      I read your review, and saw the "cheap knock off of COPS", and thought "well, yeah, but TROOPS was a cheap knock off of COPS, but it was great". Then I watched this, and realized that you were completely right. I didn't care about the characters at all, there was no plot to speak of, and there was way too much exposition and panning around beautiful but pointless CG. Someone needs to get some good fanfiction writers to write the scripts for the next episode; I think that just having some better writing would make worlds of difference, although better acting would help too.

    13. Re:A Terrible Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man do I agree on your half a star out of five rating.
      the fucking dialogue made me want to give them all a glass of shut the fuck up.

    14. Re:A Terrible Movie by Ossadagowah · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to get some good fanfiction writers to write the scripts for the next episode; Good fanfiction writers? Most fanfic is horribly written with lousy plots, awful spelling, and characters that are out of character.

      --
      anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
    15. Re:A Terrible Movie by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      They don't have an infinite supply of clones however. I think the later ones are just guys looking to pay their way through college or whatever.

    16. Re:A Terrible Movie by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      Wow then I guess saving private ryan, apocalypse now, Aliens, full metal jacket and pretty much every other war movie out there needs better military advisors cuz they're full of whiney soldiers too. "You know there's something wrong when soldiers STOP complaining."

      Yeah probably going into a combat situation they should be more serious, but guess what? its not a serious film, dude.

    17. Re:A Terrible Movie by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      Yeah I wish they could get some money together and hire a writer (maybe the author of the darthside blog?). They have good special effects (yeah not perfect, but you can tell what's going on), and the costumes and lighting look good, they just need a good story. And some better actors would be nice.

      Still it was work the 20 minutes of my time to watch this movie.

    18. Re:A Terrible Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The acting is poor. Of course, it's hard to express emotion when you don't see a single face throughout the entire movie, save for a few moments at the end, where officers suddenly appear for no apparent reason. The demeanor is off for military personnel, and the whole thing just doesn't come together in the end.

      I found it reminescent of Red vs Blue, except that it wasn't even remotely funny. RvB shows it's possible to make quality stuff with no facial expressions, but this was just crap. All of the male storm troopers were idiots (and not even funny idiots) and the women storm troopers were all serious and bitchy (should there even be women storm troopers at all? much less so many of them).

      That being said, the video was pretty good. Someone could probably re-do all the voice overs and come up with something that wasn't crap. The AvP and Pulp Fiction references were mildly amusing, but would've been much better if there had been any funny dialogue prior to them.

    19. Re:A Terrible Movie by annodomini · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's why I specified good. There is good fanfiction out there; there's even some that people say is better than the original works it's based on. Now, sturgeons law applies, probably squared (or whatever would make it closer to 100%), to fanfiction, so good fanfiction writers are few and far between, but they do exist.

    20. Re:A Terrible Movie by DaFork · · Score: 1
      its not a serious film, dude

      Ah yes... the over-used excuse.

      I agree the film was not serious, but... COPS is funny because of the situations, not the comedic dialog of the police officers (most of the time). The one trooper says, "I've been field promoted twice". Kinda sets the mood eh? The director was obviously trying to make the troopers seem realistic... he just missed the mark a tad.

    21. Re:A Terrible Movie by Eq+7-2521 · · Score: 1

      You may have missed the stairs/puke reference from Ghostbusters.

      --
      At my age I find coming up with a witty signature too exhausting.
    22. Re:A Terrible Movie by glucoseboy · · Score: 1

      While I wouldn't call it a terrible movie, I would say that I was dissappointed with it. While the CGI and overall look of the film was great, I found myself continually being distracted by the fact that the physical acting was so bad. I mean, here is this crack squad of stormtroopers strolling in reponse to report of "blaster fire" There was no intensity of movement or purpose, especially when they were "searching the area where the shots were fired". Here they are, worried about getting shot and they're just stumbling along. (was that intentional??) The script would say "spread out" but there they were, all bunched together to fill the frame. Call me a geek, but I've seen more realistic squad movements in video games i've played. 'TROOPS' remains one of my all-time favorite fan-films, 'IMPs', is just average.

  39. Grocery Store Wars by adam1101 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Another fine SW parody: Grocery Store Wars.

    1. Re:Grocery Store Wars by bani · · Score: 1

      Not very good at all. Lots of very lame strained and forced pseudo-jokes and the wild-eyed political spew is very distracting.

      Needs far better jokes and lose the political spew.

  40. Redneck Versions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After seeing some redneck jokes applied to Star Wars, I think it's about time for a fan-made movie in this vein. The possibilities boggle the mind!

  41. Not as funny as troops, but... by william_w_bush · · Score: 1

    "Stop that ship! Blast them!"

    --
    The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
  42. Amazing by hoppo · · Score: 1

    How is it that Star Wars fans can make better movies than George Lucas?

    1. Re:Amazing by s2k2vidguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, for starters, they aren't George Lucas.

  43. OT: Pls check out fan trailer for "I am Legend" by roberri · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I'm only posting this because there's a tenuous relationship with fan made projects and this trailer for Richard Matheson's "I am Legend" that a couple of my mates made.

    They showed it to the local Arts Council, but they weren't really interested. I thought that was a shame since they spent a long time on it and to be fair, I think it's pretty good. So I'm posting it here on /. to see what ppl's reactions are. Don't be shy to use the"Send Message" button and give them some feedback. Cheers guys!

    I am Legend

  44. Ghostbuster reference... by Grave_Rose · · Score: 0

    Let me know when we hit 21... I'm gonna' puke. ^_^

    Gr@ve_Rose

    --
    !ekoj on si aixelsyD
  45. Link to the movie on Filefront by NeedleSurfer · · Score: 1

    Just choose a free server with no wait time if there are still some availlable...

    The site was Slashdotted so I thought a fast link might be of circumstances...

    1. Re:Link to the movie on Filefront by neoshroom · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Mod me up while your at it. :)

      --
      Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
  46. Red vs. Blue meets Star Wars by Picass0 · · Score: 1


    Whoever wrote this just needs to spinkle a few "cockmunchers" into the dialogue and it would be an ep.of RvsB

  47. Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's awful, a waste of time.
    Some nice CG at the beginning, but after that it just drags on to no end.

  48. No it isn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent obviously has not seen the video file. Don't listen to him. Telltale signs? There is no snow or desert in this chapter at all!

    Heck, it's so nicely done they even had Peter Cullen voice the narrator! For those who don't know, he's a famous voice actor who's done cartoons for years. Think back to your childhood days and remember the throaty voice you heard in things like Voltron or the comical "KARR" from Knight Rider. Man you know a fan production is serious when they can hire professional talent and do such a good job on the effects that even Lucas might be jealous.

  49. Imperialism? by Copperhead · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is the whole thing a subtle shot at so-called "American Imperialism". Am I such a "Bush-hater" that all I can see are analogies to the U.S. military, and their ill-advised excursions (i.e. Vietnam, Iraq)? I guess it'd be funny if it didn't piss me off...

    --
    Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    1. Re:Imperialism? by polyex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Osama says your check is in the mail and thank you. Also Saddam needs you to return his tennis racket. Not sure why you think it's subtle, George Lucas said that III was a reference to George Bush and stuff a few weeks ago(also War Of The Worlds is supposed to reference 9/11 fears). Arent these filmakers so smart to educate us by being subtle, what would we do without these billionaires, who I am sure never exploited anyone on there climb to the top and would surely loan us a buck if they ran into us in the street.

    2. Re:Imperialism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, that's the way it has always been, from the ancient times. It's just America's turn to play the bully right now. In 20, 50 or 100 years it will be somebody else you be pissed off at.

      Imagine you lived ~2000 years ago in Britain. What kind of analogy would you come up with if you watched this back then?

      When the original trilogy was out, to which nation people associated the Empire with? It was not like it was Reagan's idea, people had already made the association themselves.

    3. Re:Imperialism? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      It was not like it was Reagan's idea, people had already made the association themselves.

      Yeah, stupid people, maybe. Is that why all the imperial officers had british accents? Is that why the two sides were the "rebels" and the "empire"? Because episodes 3-6 were about fighting the communists? Give me a break...

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:Imperialism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the Democratic president during the early '60s and his slow build up, protracted war known as Vietnam? Where this Democratic president stopped the US military's advances everytime the North said they were going to the peace tables.

      Or do you mean the protracted battle in Kosovo where the Democratic president stopped the military advances every time Milosovich said he was going to the peace tables and would stop his ethnic cleansing?

      Or do you mean the current war where the media, and the Democratic congressmen are trying to slow the military's advances by complaining about them being too good at their job? You know...the big bully military blowing up the enemy and stuff.

  50. Wow-please hire an editor guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was about 3 minutes of interesting concept made interminable by glacial editing. It feels like an assembly of all the footage with no eye toward pacing at all. At least the real Lucas gives some thought to cutting down the boring stuff(or rather he did in the OT).

  51. Web Server by Namlak · · Score: 2, Funny

    "And now, young Jedi, witness the power of this fully operational web server!

    Oops, wait, hang on, oh forget it...."

    1. Re:Web Server by lunchlady55 · · Score: 1

      He's EVIL! He would have said:

      "And now young Jedi, witness the power of this fully operational IIS Server!"

  52. Translation for the non-pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0kibs = 0kbps

  53. Oh no! You spoiled THE TRAILER by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    its just a long series of shots of a storm trooper putting on his body armor followed by a couple of quick cuts of storm troopers standing around in various environments (snow, desert etc.).

    You know the difference between a trailer and a feature, right?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Oh no! You spoiled THE TRAILER by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      Yes I know the difference.

      I also know the difference bewteen a good trailer and a bad one (after a good trailer the viewer is left somewhat interested in the film). This is a bad trailer.

      It's not worth looking at.

    2. Re:Oh no! You spoiled THE TRAILER by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Except that what is being linked to and talked about IS NOT THE TRAILER!

      It's the first episode of this... you've just seen the trailer, NOT the first episode... download that, then watch it, then bitch and moan all you like.

  54. Many thanks. by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    As has been said before, yours is the only one working.

    This Magnet URI seems like a great idea too, looks like I'll have to install Asurlace (or whatever it's called) in addition to everything else. I'm using bittornado, quite happy with it, maybe it does Magnet URIs too.

    (but for that I'd have to read the manual! :^)))

    I wonder why no one posted the Torrent UUencoded?

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  55. Not too shabby! by rbanzai · · Score: 1

    Yes it has alot of limitations but it was still pretty entertaining.

    The city they put together is amazing, especially the giant neon signs. They did a good job integrating the CGI and live action.

    So the acting and writing is a little limp. That makes it about the same as the current crop of star wars movies.

    There were some cute jokes, like the beeping noise the AT-ATs were making while they backed up.

    The shoot out in the landing bay was nicely done. Alot of complex effects underway at once and well-handled.

    People are incredibly hard on these 'fan' movies, to the point of spewing bile. This one is just fine. They did a ton of work on it I applaud their efforts. I hope they keep working on their skills and concentrating on the weak areas.

    1. Re:Not too shabby! by bani · · Score: 1

      beeping backing-up vehicles is a joke older than yoda, and not confined to star wars either. it's a pretty overused cliche by now.

    2. Re:Not too shabby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I think being able to write dialogue that isn't godawful should come before CGI (especially in something low budget).

  56. It was a FAN FILM for gosh sakes! by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

    I don't know what people expect for these things. I thoroughly enjoyed it. The production values were amazing. The beginning was cool as they pulled back to do the reveal. The narration was very well voiced, done by Peter Cullan.

    If you are expecting award winning performances or originality, then I suggest you look elsewhere than Star Wars fan films. The exposition lasted quite a while, but I expect that is to setup the rest of the series. For this episode, I enjoyed the mixture of the Predator creature. The banter amongst the troops was funny, and they even pulled off the being humorous when the remaining Milenium Falcon left the bay. I loved the ending. It was very light and poked fun at themselves.

    I am sure the rest of the series will be just as enjoyable. And who knows, as these people make these things it will open doors of opportunity and inspire others to do the same. On those grounds alone, the film is worth the effort.

    1. Re:It was a FAN FILM for gosh sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We expect a lot because TROOPS was, simply put, excellent. I'm not entirely convinced this movie was made by the same people. The writing seems very different, as does the entire spirit of the film. Any chance this was only the CGI guy from the original film?

      It was terrible.

      That's all I can say. I went in with an open mind, ready for any of it to be funny. Being rather easily amused, I tend to think almost anything is funny, and this just wasn't. Period. I don't think it was even trying to be funny.

      In summary, TROOPS was a cult classic. Whatever the hell this thing was called, imps or relentless or something, is pretty much not worth watching.

  57. Wasted Download by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

    Total length of trailer: 1Min 50 Sec

    The first 20 sec is a shot of the black sheep productions logo.

    The next 55 seconds is tight shots of a trooper putting on various pieces of his gear. kinda like in any one of a dozen or so USMC recriutment commercials.

    The a bunch of shots of troopers standing/walking around.
    Including :

    Troopers in snow: 1:19 and 1:24.

    Troopers in desert: 1:16.

    The last 25 seconds is shots of text directing you to their web site.

  58. non-SW no-budget flick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://patrykrebisz.com/films_f.html

    This is pretty neat. It's shot with a still camera. Cute story. (I don't know why the villian has to be hispanic, though.)

    1. Re:non-SW no-budget flick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why can't he? have the politically correct crowd deemed it incorrect to have hispanics be villians?

  59. Not bad by simpsone · · Score: 1

    I was really quite impressed. A decent amount of humor, something resembling a plot, I look forward rather anxiously for more of these.

  60. Create your own magnet URI by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I find it amazing that more torrent sites don't publish the URI in addition to the torrent file.

    Yeah, but please note that some sites (e.g. torrentspy) publish an equivalent information: the info hash.

    You can convert an info hash to a magnet URI and vice versa with this small Python script: simply pass the hash or the URI to the command line.
    --
    There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
  61. Movie review... by ngdbsdmn · · Score: 1

    It's crap.

  62. My favorite parody - Soft Wares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It may be rather dated, but it's still humorous:

    http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:h4zBYW1Yo8oJ: members.tripod.com/~FrySaturn/software.txt+%22soft +wares%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8(conveniently google cached to avoid the /. effect.) Enjoy!

  63. Heh, the ending was funny! by antdude · · Score: 1

    I like it.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  64. milking the cow by Fr05t · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article: "Is Lucas milking the cow dry, or could these updates of the classic and new films really enhance the experience?"

    The teat started squirting dust a few years ago.

  65. Bwa hahah by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Any SW fanfic that can make a Pulp Fiction reference work is OK in my book. I thought 'troops' was more fun in general though. I was so mad when they barely got any mention at that awful lucas self-back-patting of SW fan film award show dealy. "I want ton ton's for Xmas?" what's up with that?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  66. hopefully reliable torrent by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

    Here, I hosted it on a tracker I admin.

    http://hwcommunity.com/tracker/torrents/imps_chapt er1_DAVENPORT_928735.torrent

    Seeder/leecher/etc. stats are at:
    http://hwcommunity.com/tracker/

  67. An old favorite by notcarlos · · Score: 1

    Starring Ricky Gervais as Darth Brent, Mackenzie Crook as Captain Gared, and Martin Freeman as Commander Ti Canbu.

    "I am the assistant Regional Sith--"
    "Assistant to the Regional Sith, yeah."

    --
    io hymen hymnaee io
    io hymen hymnaee
  68. other misreadings by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    The "active bookmark" in Firefox truncated the title to "New Star Wars Movie From The Maker" and I got all excited like maybe Lucas was gonna make still another Star Wars movie. Cursed points of elipses being nearly invisible on a high-resolution screen...

    I guess it could be worse. I could have watched "Star Troopers". :)

  69. Re:I sense a disturbance in the web by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You just don't get it, do you? You can insult me but you can't hurt my feelings. You're just wasting your time and proving that you're a fat-loving /. retard.

  70. Nice! by Toba82 · · Score: 1

    Just watched it, it was great. Quite a different angle on the empire than we're used to seeing.

    --
    I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
  71. Awesome, love the refrences to the Bush movement by updatelee · · Score: 1

    Awesome, I cant wait for the sequels.

  72. Submitted this story 2 weeks ago by Mictian · · Score: 1


    As the title of the post says, I submitted this story 2 weeks ago and it got rejected. It wasn't exactly fresh then, since the IMPS chapter 1 was released on May 25th, but it's a lot less fresh now.

    I was certain somebody would submit it again later and it would be accepted. I just didn't want to bother the editors with it again. Oh well, here it finally is and that's good, since it is worth the attention.

    Zonk was on shift after CmdrTaco 2 weeks ago (5th) just like on this day (19th), and Zonk rejected it. I would have bet a coke back then that if it had been submitted about an hour earlier to CmdrTaco it would have been accepted. It seems I would have won that bet...

    Anyway, the point of this little complain is, I knew it would be of some interest to the slashdot crowd since Troops was and still is a positive exception in the sea of less than memorable SW fan films. Too bad Zonk couldn't realize this, or it would have been a little fresher for everyone (and isn't that what Slashdot is suppose to be about?).

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure of the former" - Albert Einstein
  73. Re:WTFM by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Hey look! A moderator who didnt watch the movie and/or hasnt played a video game in ten years!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  74. Fan-made movies by dave420 · · Score: 1

    I've yet to see one that didn't make me laugh out loud. Seriously. They all have fat Americans running around pretending to be cool, which is just silly. :) Like they're trying to relive something in their childhood on film. I can understand that, but just try and keep it to yourself. Until fans get the idea that little things called "production value" and "the ability to write dialog" are necessary for any scripted fan creation, we're just going to see more and more of these horrible videos. oof.