Slashdot Mirror


Drupal Needs a New Home

reardonsteel writes "All of the Drupal websites were offline for about two days because of a server meltdown at the organization's hosting provider. The main Drupal website is back up with a single temporary page and they've announced a fund-raising drive to raise US$3000 for a new server to be hosted at the Open Source Lab at Oregon State University's server farm. Drupal is the leading open-source (written in PHP) content management system and is used to power tens of thousands of websites, blogs, community sites, etc." At this point, all they need is an actual server, too: the OSL has agreed to provide rack space, bandwidth, power, backup facilities and support.

295 comments

  1. Nice by z0ink · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now we'll go ahead and destroy the temporary server too. Good work.

    --
    Steal This Sig
    1. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't a sane webmaster who doesn't want any and all human visitors who have no bad intentions. Most people on the web have to pay for advertising to get visitors to a website. If you don't want the visitors, send them to my site.

    2. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to slashdot, where fucktards like Taco ruin stuff 'cause he doesn't have the descency to warn people he's going to link to people. Asshole.

    3. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice that despite all your bluster, you didn't have the cojones to actually link your site even within the comments section, nevermind on the front page.

    4. Re:Nice by Parham · · Score: 1

      At least they raised the required funds. Right now they have $6468 USD, and they were only asking for $3000 USD. Looks like they'll also be able to deal with the temporary server after it was slashdotted.

    5. Re:Nice by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      I hate to downplay the organisation, as they are an OSS development group, but doesn't this sound a lot like what lokitorrent pulled?

      I mean, what type of computer costs 3000? You can get a good rackmount for $1200. Usually, all it takes to host a website is a high end desktop at up to $950.

    6. Re:Nice by robertjw · · Score: 4, Informative

      I mean, what type of computer costs 3000? You can get a good rackmount for $1200. Usually, all it takes to host a website is a high end desktop at up to $950.

      Many computers cost $3000 and up. I've seen rackmount machines from HP, Dell and Sun all cost way more than $3000.

      Mostly it depends on what their uses are. If they are just using it to host their website they probably don't need much of a server, if they are using that server as a development/test platform as well I'm sure it would be helpful to have a somewhat bigger machine. Actually, from their site:

      Currently, drupal.org runs on a shared server paid for and maintained by Kjartan. The server is a single Pentium Xeon 3Ghz with 1 GB of RAM. There are about 20 sites running on the server, including some of our sites like http://drupal.org/, http://drupaldocs.org/ and http://cvs.drupal.org/. In addition to the websites, the server hosts our mailing lists, mailing list archives and CVS repositories. Last month, drupal.org alone served more than 3 million pages for 100 Gb of traffic (this does not include any of the other sites or services; non Drupal websites, Drupal mailing list traffic, etc).

      Where I work we run HP DL380 machines, which is not really a high end server. Base price on those is $2899. In a perfect world, that would be about the class of server I would want to run a site like Drupal has.

    7. Re:Nice by tomjen · · Score: 1

      Well if a 3ghz 1 gb ram does not cover it, they are properly looking for a small supercomputer, not a 950 desktop.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    8. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have no qualms over a link to my pages on the frontpage of Slashdot. It's a static site, I pay a flat rate for unlimited traffic and have a host which can handle this and won't cut me off for a traffic pike. 5 normal days of advertising pay for the hosting.

      IOW, hosting is cheap enough that you should pay for some headroom, so you can welcome the free visitors instead of fearing the Slashdot effect.

      Same for Drupal: I bet the additional attention they got from a story on Slashdot easily earned them enough extra donations to meet and exceed the extra hosting costs caused by the Slashdot effect, if they are on a metered plan.

    9. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an original comment you've made for slashdot. Perhaps this post about server meltdown can be incorporated into the scripting for the website to automatically insert a comment for every article about server meltdown.

      "lol"

    10. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you'll actually look at tfs, you will notice that timothy, not taco, posted this story

    11. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd have no qualms about it, give us a fucking link then?

    12. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's offtopic and this is not the frontpage. Posting a link here wouldn't prove anything.

    13. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dell PowerEdge 1850 1U starts at $3928 for the basic configuration. Add a second harddrive, 2Gb memory and a second CPU and it's $4475 already. These guys are not even asking the full sum of the server.

      Before commenting, you may want to go and have a look at the Dell site, maybe?

    14. Re:Nice by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      Interesting, because we host 5 counter strike gaming servers and about 19 websites.

      We use it for file storage backup and development.

      It's just an AMD 2600 processor with 1 GB of ram. The motherboard is just a cheap soyo. It's co-located in a datacenter on a gigabit network (and has a gigabit card)

      All this runs on the machine fine. I don't see why you need something like a high end SGI for this.

    15. Re:Nice by russianspy · · Score: 1

      There is a lot that goes into a server that is unheard of in desktop market. Like reliability, redundancy and fault management. Real server will give you an amazing amount of remote administration. Like being able to log in to a computer after a crash (just the management piece, the main one would not come up properly), figure out that the damage is either one of the cpus and/or the related memory bank, disable that piece and bring it back? Later that day we got a replacement and swapped it out *without* turning off the machine. It's slightly better than your average desktop box.

    16. Re:Nice by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      It's not just the base specs that drive server prices. Consider - a 3Ghz, 1GB desktop vs. a 3Ghz, 1GB Dell PowerEdge 2650.

      Things the PowerEdge has that a regular desktop doesn't:
      - dual built-in Gig ethernet.
      - hardware based Adaptec RAID 0,1,5,1+0 SCSI controller with two channels.
      - Seperate 10/100 MBit firmware based remote management (basically lets you pipe the monitor output over a dedicated ethernet to a management console)
      - dual redundant powersupplies
      - hot-swappable hard disks (5 of them)
      - Up to 2 CPUs and up to 12 or 16GB of RAM

      I'm sure I'm missing some stuff, but that's for a Dell, the cheap end of server hardware. A reasonable PowerEdge goes for around $4,000 to regular folks.

      Once you get into IBM-land prices go up. Same for Sun - but for the Unix servers you get things like the ability to swap out RAM while the system is running, and the OS will tell you when a stick goes bad.

      There are many, many reasons by sysadmins will pay more than a desktop for superficial desktop-like specs.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    17. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cause your servers/site nowhere near as many people are interested in as in the drupal sites. Read the fine announcement, what traffic/hits they have.

    18. Re:Nice by lanc · · Score: 1

      The best would be ofcourse when you would offer them a mirror, having enough horsepower and bandwidth.

      --
      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
  2. Free to a good home, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one open-source content management system. Great with PHP and sysadmins, responds to the name Drupal.

  3. well, since i can't get to the link by GutBomb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and the description doesn't give me any indication whatsoever... what the hell is this about? what is drupal, what happened to their server, and why should i care?

    1. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by GutBomb · · Score: 1

      of course description was edited to include more info after i posted this

    2. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      If you RTFB, it says "Drupal is the leading open-source (written in PHP) content management system and is used to power tens of thousands of websites, blogs, community sites, etc."

      Never heard of them though, and I still don't know what it means either :-)

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Its an open source project in need of funding. All you need to know!

    4. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by JasdonLe · · Score: 5, Informative
      Drupal is a CMS (Content Management System). It's like Slash, or PHPNuke, or Mambo. I wouldn't call it THE leading CMS, like the summary does, but it is terrific software.

      If you don't know anything about the software I listed above, just google them!

      --
      ** A Sketch a Week **
      http://www.sketchplease.com
    5. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by grendel_x86 · · Score: 1

      Drupal is a Content Management System, like slashCode, or Mambo.

      They have a VERY large folowing, so im assuming they will hit the $3k soon. (following is a summary of the page you cant hit)

      They took their server down to make physical upgrades three days ago, and when their server was brought back up, it wasnt quite right, now it dosnt work at all, and their host isnt responding to them (bad host).

      They need the $$ so they can buy a decient server to colo w/ OSL.

      --
      Im glad /. isnt the real world, that would really suck..
    6. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by drzolo · · Score: 0

      i partly agree with you. I dont know who/what drupal is, and i would not contribute to site i am not familiar with. Besides the whole thing seems fishy. (but everyone seems fishy when they want money from me..) 3000$ for a server? That almost cost as much as my Gaming Machine!

    7. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here is a quick link to a Wikipedia article about them. I have no idea why I should care, but it does explain what it is. It's used to run a couple of sites I do use (kerneltrap being the most memorable). It sounds like a blog/content publishing program writting in PHP.

      The first several google links all appear to point to the site that is down. Even the cached links I read didn't get to the part that actually described what it was. Hope that helps.

      Kirby

    8. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      No, it wasn't. I saw the posting when there were 0 comments and it clearly said it was a content management system.

    9. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      I can second that.

    10. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by Lew+Payne · · Score: 1

      || what is drupal, what happened to their server, and why should i care?

      Are you just too stupid to use Google, or did you not bother to read the very post
      you responded to, which clearly said Drupal is a content management system. Retard.

    11. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of it either...

      BTW, archive.org pulls it up fine ;-) Oddly enough, its even pulling up the screenshots as well.

    12. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be cautious grouping it with Slash or nuke. Those are previous-generation CMS systems, and are becoming quite dated.

      Newer stuff such as Drupal, Mambo (which I personally dislike), Textpattern, and other newer CMS systems have embraced emerging web technologies (Ajax, CSS) and are generally written with extremely clean code and have very simplistic ways of operating (mac-like if you would care to make the analogy)

      Slash and nuke are dinosaurs. They may still work fine, but if you're going to make a new site, you'd do yourself a favor to research the newer options. Development on all of the 'old' CMSes has stalled, and little work is being done to improve them.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    13. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by sud_crow · · Score: 1

      "[..] because of a server meltdown at the organization's hosting provider."

      "Drupal is the leading open-source (written in PHP) content management system"

      Does that ring a bell??

      Also, i cant understand how someone who is reading a story in slashdot doesnt have the brains to go to www.google.com and look for some reviews or info... Also instead of making a scene about how incomplete the article is, RTA!: the article is about Drupal server melting down, not to inform you about what is drupal or why should you care...

      --
      no sig
    14. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever you search in google and you see the distinctly '{Page Title}|{Web Site Name}' text pattern littered among the results, you can be sure that it's a drupal-powered site. Their number being quite a handful is an indicator of drupal's popularity among the web's denizens.

    15. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny

      Think statuesque black transvestite. Really all you need to know.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    16. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Zope with Plone is the most superior CMS around.
      Object orientated is the way to go.

    17. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by reardonsteel · · Score: 1

      To echo some of the other comments made, Drupal is very much the "next generation" of CMS software systems. The main difference lies in the ability to do more sophisticated things like workflow. Mostly this is possible because of the sophisticated (and sometimes, complex) taxonomies that are possible, and the methods available of linking "nodes" in the overall structure of the site operating under Drupal to various actions that you want performed. For instance, creating a typical site workflow like "upload article -- wait for editor to review -- review article and publish" are relatively easy to do with Drupal. Like with any other tool, this sophistication comes at a price: it's harder to rollout a full-blown Drupal-based site than it is to do a PHPNuke or PostNuke site. But you can sure do a lot more with them.

    18. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by uss_valiant · · Score: 1

      Other users already pointed out that you probably can't say that Drupal is the leading open-source CMS. It's one of several leading FOSS PHP CMS products, along with typo3 the upcoming xaraya and a few others.
      Then there are all the Java-based CMS', which are not used by the masses because they are usually a little more resource hungry and your next shared webhosting plan doesn't include server side Java applications support.
      And forget about *nuke like portals (I wouldn't call them CMS). They play in another league.

      cmsmatrix.org gives a nice overview. And if you are interested in PHP-based products, you can test a lot of them on this site.

    19. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      How is that insightful - perhaps a bit informative but not really insightful as it does not offer any supportive evidence or insight.

      Zope/Plone is very good but it has its shortcomings - localization support (for translated content) is not as easy to setup as in Mambo or other CMS and, if I remember well, it supports only Python scripting language (without additional and painful integration with Perl and/or other languages).

    20. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by doubledoh · · Score: 1
      If you're into a more robust "new" CMS, I recommend tikiwiki. Tiki Wiki is probably the most powerful open source php based CMS out there, and it has a HUGE development community and probably too many features. If you're willing to spend a day or two sorting through all of the options, you won't be disappointed.

      But yeah, if you're after a simple quick solution, Drupal is nice. It's more like fancy blog software than a full blown CMS IMHO.

      --
      I think, therefore I doh.
    21. Re:well, since i can't get to the link by petermgreen · · Score: 1
      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  4. What I love about the FOSS movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In only 12 hours, they have already raised nearly 2000 dollars for the new server, PRIOR to the posting on slashdot. People who care change the world for the BETTER, while those who don't impact it terribly.

    1. Re:What I love about the FOSS movement by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Wow, they ought to get the last $1,000 in no time now that it's posted on slashdot. Hell, they'll probably make a few thousand extra before they shut it down. A nice way to give the project a boost in funding!

    2. Re:What I love about the FOSS movement by garcia · · Score: 1

      I use Drupal on my own site and love it. The ability to run PHP code in their "blocks" and the challenge of integrating Gallery v1 support to my own site gave me something to do for a while.

      While it has its annoyances it is probably one of the best CMS I have seen and certainly the easiest to setup and maintain.

      I just donated 20 Euros ($24 and change USD) to the project.

    3. Re:What I love about the FOSS movement by JamesD_UK · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just looking at the page now.. Received: $6468 USD I guess they're going to get their new server ;-)

    4. Re:What I love about the FOSS movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They raised about $5k in about 10 minutes after slashdot post, soooo. Maybe they can get an Opteron server now :)

    5. Re:What I love about the FOSS movement by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

      They could get a nice Opteron in the first place.

      Tyan GX28 1u rackmount... plus a couple reasonable Opteron 242 CPU's... and 2GB of RAM... and some pair of modest hard drives (SATA)... and they have a system for $2500 that is well built and 64bit.

    6. Re:What I love about the FOSS movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who don't care impact the world terribly? Excuse me, but what kind of fucked up logic is that? Stalin -cared greatly and killed millions of people, likewise for hitler. Ashcroft cared and got us the Patriot Act whereas millions of Democrats and Greens haven't gotten us shit dispite caring.

      People who don't care don't change SHIT, sherlock. They effect NOTHING>

      Now go back and take logic 101, fucktard.

  5. Durpal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Durpal is great because you can find everything there and for very low prices although the shipping could be cheaper.

  6. In case that happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Dear friends and supporters of Drupal,

    Quite a few people have pointed out that drupal.org has been slow lately. We know it's been slow, and have been working on optimizing Drupal.org; adding new features to help keep (evil) crawlers out, fine tuning MySQL and Apache, etc. The fact remains that as the result of Drupal's growing popularity, the server is saturated pretty much all day. This explains drupal.org's poor performance.

    To make a long story short, our current server doesn't cut it anymore. Our unprecedented growth in traffic requires more and better hardware. To buy a new server we need your help to raise $3000 USD. Read more about the details below, or just click the Paypal donation button on the right.
    Where we are now

    Currently, drupal.org runs on a shared server paid for and maintained by Kjartan. The server is a single Pentium Xeon 3Ghz with 1 GB of RAM. There are about 20 sites running on the server, including some of our sites like http://drupal.org/, http://drupaldocs.org/ and http://cvs.drupal.org/. In addition to the websites, the server hosts our mailing lists, mailing list archives and CVS repositories. Last month, drupal.org alone served more than 3 million pages for 100 Gb of traffic (this does not include any of the other sites or services; non Drupal websites, Drupal mailing list traffic, etc).
    What we have planned

    In the few past weeks we have been talking to the Open Source Lab (OSL) at Oregon State University and they generously offered to provide free rack space, free bandwidth, free power, free backup facilities and onsite support. Scott Kveton, Associate Director of the Open Source Lab, explains:

    "The OSL currently hosts several open source projects such as Mozilla, Gentoo, Debian, Freenode and the Apache Software Foundation. The hosting we do is to help facilitate projects as they grow and leverage an economy of scale by hosting them all in the same facilities. The services hosted at the OSL currently touch well over 20 million unique visitors a day and growing at a phenomenal rate.

    As part of the hosting we do here, we offer other services such as DNS, database, backups, mail relay etc to the community to free up their hardware to do the "main thing" for their project. We have offered up rack space, bandwidth, power and our "smart hands" service to the Drupal project because we want to help a great project that is having a significant community meeting one of our goals; enabling communities."

    In order to take advantage of this generous offer, we need to supply our own server.
    What we need to get there

    We would like to buy a Dell PowerEdge 1850 1U (or equivalent hardware) with two Pentium 2.8Ghz Xeon CPUs, at least 2 GB RAM and two 70+ GB SCSI disks with a RAID controller. The total cost of such hardware is approximately $3000 USD ... and this is where we need your help . It is time for us to move to a new home.

    Once we have collected enough money to buy a new server, we'll get it to OSL's data center, and we'll move the Drupal sites and services from the current server to the new server. At the same time, we hope to grow our team of server administrators, as well as extend the services we offer to the community. Things we plan to provide include a subversion mirror, an infrastructure for nightly tests, and so on.
    How we are doing this

    As many of you know, Drupal does not currently have a non-profit or foundation status. We are working on this and discussing with other large Open Source projects how they have handled it themselves. This will help in determining what will be best for us. No matter what we decide, filling out forms and filing paperwork will take time and money. Time we don't have.

    Currently all funds are held by Dries so the equipment purchased will also

    1. Re:In case that happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about PR for them. The service you get is equal to the amount of good PR that can come of it. Their big project (Mozilla) will take precidence over DRUPAL. If they have enough bandwidth for either a Mozilla release or DRUPAL's release they won't split it 50/50. It will go all to Mozilla. Why? Because the marketing drones think that will 'look better'. They aren't about enabling communities, they are about stroking their own egos

      It doesn't matter what is good for the Open Source community. It is only about what makes the OSUOSL look good.

    2. Re:In case that happens by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 1, Informative

      ...The server is a single Pentium Xeon 3Ghz with 1 GB of RAM...

      What a bunch of asshats!

      My web server is a mere Pentium III Xeon dual 700mhz but I have 4 gigs of RAM. That's right! 4 gigs of sweet, beautiful, delicious, delectible RAM. Even my home computer has more RAM than Drupal's "server".

    3. Re:In case that happens by mdecarle · · Score: 1

      You don't really have to do anything to divide bandwidth. There will be more people interested in Mozilla than in Drupal, hence the bandwidth will be requested by more visitors for one project over the other. Give every visitor a fair share and you'll end up giving more bandwidth to Mozilla than to Drupal.

      It could go like this:
      Drupal> Did Mozilla get more bandwidth?
      OSUOSL> Do they have more visitors?
      Drupal> Yes.
      OSUOSL> Then they got more bandwidth.

    4. Re:In case that happens by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      Slightly OT, but I'd like to know where he's getting a server with those specs at that price. I can't seem to configure one like that on Dell's site for any less then 4500.

  7. Who? by Jeet81 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Never heard of Drupal. Can this be a marketing scheme?

    1. Re:Who? by lordsilence · · Score: 3, Informative

      Certainly could. But I've never heard about the Mamboserver project ( http://www.mamboserver.com/ ) before. But they dont claim to be leading in the CMS business, just among the most powerful *shrug*

    2. Re:Who? by Augmento · · Score: 1

      i use drupal for my guildwars fansite at www.tyria.net, of all the CMS out there its probably the most intuitive. its biggest drawback is that forums, the main component of most community sites is an after thought with drupal and ends up being more work to manage than its worth.

  8. Re:What was drupal? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why do i care about this project?

    It needs your money.

    What was its place

    drupal.org

    and its goals?

    Collect $3000.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  9. Oh that's good... by noneloud · · Score: 4, Funny

    They have a server meltdown, so Slashdot gives them another?

    tim, I think you should watch your (real life) Karma...That's not very nice :)

  10. 3000??? rediculous by sofar · · Score: 0, Troll


    xfce just got donated a new server from 2x.com For less than 1600 dollars. 3000? gimme a break!

    1. Re:3000??? rediculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they are planning on buying a REAL server. One that has a supporting organization behind them. One that has a reliable warranty. One that doesn't rely on IDE drives.

      In other words they wish to buy a HP/Dell/IBM server, not a whitebox POS 2000. $3,000 is a fairly low-end server from these companies but, they won't have to worry about the server for at least 3 years and probably much longer than that.

    2. Re:3000??? rediculous by sofar · · Score: 1


      Even 2 year old dell servers will make you worry. I've got one with a SCSI disc that is starting to give bad sectors. 3 years is a _very_ long time especially for always-on hardware. You're better of replacing it after 2 then fixing it after 3 years.

    3. Re:3000??? rediculous by ewilts · · Score: 1

      For quality hardware, 3 years is *NOTHING*. I've got production servers that were purchased in 1996 and are still working fine. My mail servers are in the process of being upgraded, but they're about 5 years old now (when Red Hat Linux 6.1 and 6.2 were current). Good hardware runs almost forever. If you're replacing hardware every 2 years, you're buying junk.

      --
      .../Ed
    4. Re:3000??? rediculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a 486DX2/66 server in 1994. It was used daily, and ran continiously until 2004, when it finally died. The server wasn't being used anymore, and was buried. It basically ran 10 years without being shut down - had 2 or 3 power outages though. Had we cared, we could probably have resurrected it, and it would still be running today.

      BTW: It had NTServer 3.51/4.0 on it (yes, it did get restarted).

  11. Renting a dedicated box? by moz25 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I don't get is why they aren't renting their own dedicated box, so they don't have to own the hardware. You can get a dual Xeon configuration for about $200-300/month and with about 2TB of bandwidth. Of course now they won't have a monthly bill, but every time they need to upgrade the machine or repair it, there are going to be costs.

    1. Re:Renting a dedicated box? by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Because $200-300/month is a lot for a FOSS project just starting to figure out how to make enough money to cover their costs. I'm sure hosting costs are coming out of their pockets right now.

    2. Re:Renting a dedicated box? by suwain_2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A few reasons I can think of off-hand:
      * Renting higher-end servers gets awfully expensive
      * Adding another hard drive might cost you something like $20/month forever -- if you plan on being around for a long time, it's actaully much cheaper to just buy
      * I've read a few horror stories of people whose dedicated server providers (some at fairly reputable places) had their servers formatted by mistake. With a colocated server, you don't have to worry about a tech transposing a couple digits in your IP and formatting the wrong machine.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    3. Re:Renting a dedicated box? by moz25 · · Score: 1

      Well, I've had experience both with co-located boxes and with dedicated (rented) boxes. The reason I migrated to rented boxes was because when a co-located box fails, you have to go down there personally and fix things. Migration to another provider is also a lot more cumbersome (you have to pick up your box, during which time you'll be offline) and generally, you're still paying for the bandwidth. In their case, they have the fortunate (but unusual) situation of not having to pay for co-location.

      I don't find a 2TB bandwidth cap for $300 expensive at all. You're right about the hard drive thing, but often they'll have some special where you pay a steep one-time fee (e.g. $200) to have a big drive added. I've rented dedicated servers since mid-2003 (2 years now) and I haven't had a formatting error happen to me. My guess is that it's not that common. I did have a PSU break down due to a local power surge on a co-located box... while I was out of the country. Fun!

    4. Re:Renting a dedicated box? by Sithgunner · · Score: 1

      Why $3000? They trying to get some pocket money from it?

      You can build a new box with about $500 or some more if you take reliable hardwares, but won't be as bad as $1000.

      It seems like USA is having problem getting a decent network under good price. If it was for Japan in here, you can get 100Mbps up/down at $60 per month.

      And this is by owning the hardware.
      I hope they can get it cheaper.

  12. Re:What was drupal? by JasdonLe · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Posts like the parent really irk me. "Why do I care about this project?" it asks as if Slashdot is the parents own personal newsfeed -- only stories pertaining to the life of parent should appear on the front page, or indeed anywhere else within the site. If parent hasn't heard of it, it must not be anything that matters.

    Parent? Meet Google. I know it's hard to believe, but this is a site that catalogs the entire internet and allows you to search through them for the information you seek. For example, if you were to type "Drupal" in the text box and hit enter, the website would return thousands of pages that use that term, and would further enlighten you to

    Or you could just use Wikipedia, which, of course, has a wonderful page up about Drupal. Oh, but I forgot. You're too busy to do any of that. We should just explain everything to you. Who do you think you are, man? Seriously? Not a web developer, obviously.

    --
    ** A Sketch a Week **
    http://www.sketchplease.com
  13. Slashdot Trolling Phenomena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Slashdot trolling phenomena
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

    About
    Main article
    History
    Subculture
    People
    CmdrTaco
    Co wboyNeal
    Anonymous Coward
    Slashdot trolling
    Other
    Slashdot effect
    SlashCode
    Trolltalk
    Slashdot trolling phenomena make up a large subset of the bizarre and complex subculture found on the popular technology website Slashdot. They are a mixture of juvenilia, sarcasm, deliberately bad jokes, tasteless nonsense and highly developed and artistic attempts to provoke outraged responses from other forum users, or amuse them. Slashdot trolling is a subset and a microcosm of Internet trolling in general. Some of these behaviours are usually considered to be more offensive or insightful than others. On Slashdot, many of these phenomena have become the object of parody.
    Slashdot trolls can generally be divided into four categories: disruptive, offensive, deceptive, and idiosyncratic. Disruptive trolls are those which intend to disrupt the normal flow of things on Slashdot, either by decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio or by causing the pages to render incorrectly. Offensive trolls exist for the sole purpose of offending as many people as possible. The purpose of deceptive trolls is to trick people into either following a link or reading a comment which seems legitimate but is actually a troll. Idiosyncratic trolls are those which are specific to Slashdot and have elements of Slashdot culture and history in them creating, in effect, an inside joke.
    Contents
    [hide]
    1 Disruptive trolls
    1.1 Crapflooding
    1.2 Page widening/lengthening
    2 Offensive trolls
    2.1 Homosexuality and racism
    2.2 Anti-semitism
    2.3 Nationalistic insults
    3 Deceptive trolls
    3.1 Karma Whores
    3.2 Article text alteration trolls
    3.3 Web vendor referral trolls
    3.4 Signature trolls
    3.5 Movie spoiler
    4 Idiosyncratic trolls
    4.1 First post
    4.2 Netcraft confirms it
    4.3 Stephen King is dead
    4.4 First Obituary
    4.5 Hot grits/Natalie Portman
    4.6 Reigniting flamewars
    5 Minor trolls
    6 See also
    [edit]
    Disruptive trolls

    The purpose of disruptive trolls is to cause the pages of Slashdot to display in an undesirable way or to otherwise bring attention to themselves. The two major categories of disruptive trolls are crapflooding and page-widening.
    [edit]
    Crapflooding
    Crapflooding is the posting of many nonsensical or gratuitously offensive messages in order to disrupt the normal functioning of Slashdot and annoy its users and editors.
    Later versions of the software behind the Slashdot website had an updated lameness filter to prevent posting of the same message more than once. However, crapflooders began avoiding this restriction by varying the content of the message after each post. Crapfloods can be performed manually with a dedicated user repeatedly clicking through the posting options each time, or automated by a piece of software. Automated crapfloods are -- not surprisingly -- larger, more effective and more frequent. The subject of crapflooded messages varies. Some examples include:
    Offtopic stories
    Pornographic/Homoerotic sex scenes with the names replaced with those of the slashdot editors or open source celebrities.
    Incoherent nonsense that contains the correct letter frequencies so the lameness filter recognises it as vaguely English.
    Offensive Base64 encoded images or text.
    Warning, potentially offensive external links:
    An example of crapflooding
    Another crapflood example
    [edit]
    Page widening/lengthening
    The original page widening posts were simple messages consisting of one long stream of characters with no spaces. This caused browsers to render a very wide page with horizontal scroll bars, making it nearly impossible to read the comments page. Slashdot began inserting spaces into any long run of characters to prevent this and so began the evolutionary battle between Slashcode and the page widening trolls. Newer and more inventive ways o

  14. A good candidate for P2P? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last month, drupal.org alone served more than 3 million pages for 100 Gb of traffic (this does not include any of the other sites or services; non Drupal websites, Drupal mailing list traffic, etc).

    Once they have a new box, why don't they distribute their software and docs up on P2P? surely that'll lighten the network load and cost them less.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:A good candidate for P2P? by viksit · · Score: 1

      Not a bad thought.

      But problems in P2P make it bad for distribution of software which is updated regularly. CVS updates? Document additions? PHP based, contributable and regularly updated content on the site itself is what is being looked at.

      --
      If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...oh, wait a minute - he already does.
    2. Re:A good candidate for P2P? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      But problems in P2P make it bad for distribution of software which is updated regularly.

      For big tarballs and things like that, they could just maintain torrents up for whatever file they want to distribute. When they make a new release, they post the torrent, first seed it, then let other BT clients help distribute it. The worst that can happen is that they maintain torrents to older releases that next to nobody downloads anymore, and they're the only seed for them, and they're not worse off than having to serve them themselves as they did before.

      CVS updates?

      Yes, they'd have to keep that. But then, do you think CVS traffic outweighs tarballed distributions in terms of network usage?

      PHP based, contributable and regularly updated content on the site itself is what is being looked at.

      As long as they're files to download, I don't see a reason not to distribute them with BT.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:A good candidate for P2P? by volkris · · Score: 1

      Check out Dijjer. It was made for this kind of situation.

      It's sort of P2P for distribution of legit material from an actual publisher. No worried about being out of date, as the publisher maintains control of what gets transferred.

    4. Re:A good candidate for P2P? by volkris · · Score: 1

      I responded to the parent post, but since you brought P2P distribution up I also wanted to respond to you to point you in the direction of Dijjer. It's far better suited to this situation than bittorrent.

      Just, you know, FYI.

  15. Drag Queen? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Isn't Drupal that drag queen? If I donate money, do I get a free account for the picture galleries? No, but seriously, Drupal is one of the more visible well written PHP applications, something to point at when the Perl freaks start blathering about how PHP is crap unfit for serious projects, and so on...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Drag Queen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but seriously, Drupal is one of the more visible well written PHP applications, something to point at when the Perl freaks start blathering about how PHP is crap unfit for serious projects, and so on...

      Okay, so that's one.

  16. All Together Now... by PingXao · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So what?

    Seriously, I have never heard of Drupal until I saw this article. It may be useful software, very useful, but who knows? FA like this should really start off like this:
    "Drupal, the leading PHP blog server provider, has problems..."

    Then maybe /.ers can figure out what the hell you're talking about. Your pet tech doesn't mean everybody else immediately knows what you're talking about.
    1. Re:All Together Now... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Seriously, I have never heard of Drupal until I saw this article. It may be useful software, very useful, but who knows?"
      This is Slashdot not CNN. It is assumed that if you do not know what a program is you would do a Google on it or at least click the link.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:All Together Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Seriously, I have never heard of Drupal until I saw this article. It may be useful software, very useful, but who knows?"
      This is Slashdot not CNN. It is assumed that if you do not know what a program is you would do a Google on it or at least click the link.


      Yeah, but this is the norm, not the exception. It is the /. version of the current media bias going on in the U.S.

      Your lack of recognition of bias does not mean it doesn't exist.

    3. Re:All Together Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, I have never heard of Drupal until I saw this article.

      PingXao meet google, google meet PingXao.

    4. Re:All Together Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, I have never heard of Drupal until I saw this article. It may be useful software, very useful, but who knows? FA like this should really start off like this:

      "Drupal, the leading PHP blog server provider, has problems..."


      Well, Drupal is not exactly a blog server provider. But rather than explaining myself, I'll direct you to the article summary!

      Drupal is the leading open-source (written in PHP) content management system and is used to power tens of thousands of websites, blogs, community sites, etc."

    5. Re:All Together Now... by Alinraz · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe I'll burn some karma with this but I just can't let this stand...

      "Seriously", how could you read /. and miss Drupal. I just implemented several Drupal sites; I discovered Drupal primarily due to the coverage of it here on /..

      I do agree that often articles here need a bit more context, especially when discussing a software package, but when I don't know what a post is talking about I either Google it or just figure I don't care.

  17. Drupal powers... by UnConeD · · Score: 4, Informative

    To answer the question, what is Drupal...

    Drupal is the open-source CMS behind:

    and many more sites. Even if you don't know Drupal, you've probably visited a Drupal site before. Drupal is known for its modular architecture, clean code and developer friendlyness.

    1. Re:Drupal powers... by egoff · · Score: 1

      Actually, spread firefox is using CivicSpace, which is based on what the Howard Dean campaign did with Drupal (DeanSpace) during the primary campaign last year.

    2. Re:Drupal powers... by Chris+Rathman · · Score: 1


      Also powers Lambda the Ultimate: The Programming Languages Weblog.

      Shameless plug from LtU contributing editor. :-)

    3. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      It's also known for its recent priviledge escalation vulnerability,a turn-of-the-century sounding "gain admin at signup" issue which would probably lead most sane people to disregard Drupal as a contender for any serious use.

    4. Re:Drupal powers... by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      That was addressed on June 29th.

    5. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      June 29th, 2005, right? A circa-2000 security issue (priviledge elevation due to inadequate input sanitization) that resulted in full admin access to any remote user was resolved in Drupal less than 30 days ago? Well, I feel much better now, let me reinstall it!

    6. Re:Drupal powers... by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      There was no date on the post you linked to, so I assumed you were referring to the xml-rpc issue. My mistake in questioning your superior intellect!

    7. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      My sarcasm was directed at the idea of an exploit of this magnitude being found in recently-written software, as in "is this really something we would find in software in 2005". Only poorly-written code would have that serious of a priviledge escalation vulnerability found this far past the point when that class of vulnerabilities were at their peak.

    8. Re:Drupal powers... by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      When it comes to Drupal, you're talking out of your hat. But it's of no interest to me whether you use it or not.

    9. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      The vulnerability speaks for itself. Failure to validate input (which is #1 exploit cause on OWASP Top Ten list) results in the ability to gain admin rights at signup. How many other code paths in Drupal are there where input sanitization was not performed? That type of validation should be at the heart of all input processing, the vulnerability shows that this is not the case.

    10. Re:Drupal powers... by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      If you have a critique, then RTFC and point out the flaws. Everything else is just posing. There are plenty of posts here written that cite some high profile sites using Drupal that presumably would benefit from your insights. And as I said before, if you have no use for Drupal, it's no skin off my back.

    11. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      I can't be any clearer at pointing out the fundamental flaw. It's like the recent Cardservice breach that resulted in the theft of as many as 40 million credit card numbers. Best practice is "don't store the credit card numbers". but that's exactly what Cardservices ignored (or was oblivious to), and then someone hacked in and was able to retrieve the account information. In the case of a web application, best practice is to develop a core set of methods for safely accessing input. That's exactly what did not happen in Drupal. Look at one of the patches from June:

      - $edit['subject'] = truncate_utf8(decode_entities(strip_tags(check_out put($edit['comment'], $edit['format']))), 29, TRUE);
      + // Note: format is checked by check_output().
      + $edit['subject'] = truncate_utf8(decode_entities(strip_tags(check_out put($edit['comment'], $edit['format'], TRUE))), 29, TRUE);

      What the hell kind of base input checking code is that? Imagine the situation where someone accidentally leaves out one of those 5-deep functions or screws up the perens and puts the TRUE with the wrong function and one or more sites get compromised as a result. Sure looks like what happened up there - someone forgot a TRUE in the middle of that mess. There is no excuse as to why the single most important thing in securing a web application should require a function call chain that looks like that.

    12. Re:Drupal powers... by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      Is that a cvs patch? You and I both know that cvs risks instability because of constant meddling with the code. Patches get submitted by all sorts of people -- it's a mostly open community -- but only some get committed to head. You and I also know that an open source software system is going to evolve slowly over time. If you're arguing against open source software, then I wonder why you're posting on this thread. If not, then what open source CMS/community software would you recommend over Drupal?

    13. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      But the security aspects of software can't afford to evolve over time. They need to be in place from day one. Drupal is not like sendmail, bind, or any of those other crufty ancient programs that can be excused for their myriad of security vulnerabilities over the years. Drupal is recent and, as an open source user and developer myself, it bothers me to see software that is still developed with security as an afterthought or bolted-on process. I do not have an alternative CMS suggestion, however, I hope that if someone does think of developing one, that they will consider security from day one. Because, unfortunately, I've seen this pattern before in other software - it's just going to be exploit after exploit after exploit.

    14. Re:Drupal powers... by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      Drupal is no Nuke. It's been rock solid. Security lapses happen all the time, even with Apple (10.4.oops!). It's held up to quite a bit of use, with some big adopters such as Deanspace, Spreadfirefox, Kerneltrap, Yahoo. Nobody likes security breaches, but they are a fact of life. If you'd been working with the developers, maybe they'd have anticipated the xml-rpc issue sooner. I hope you'll download the tarball (available on their temp page) and see for yourself.

    15. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      I really think Drupal will be the next Nuke. The XML-RPC thing isn't really their fault, it's a problem with a third-party library.

      OK, geez, this is absurd. This software is crap. I was looking in google for the url to the "gain admin at signup" vulnerability (which I saw in Bugtraq in the last week or two and was the one I was originally refering to, not the XML-RPC one) and I came across another vulnerability at http://packetstorm.linuxsecurity.com/0506-advisori es/DRUPAL-SA-2005-002.txt which is also less than two weeks old which is basically "execute arbitrary code on remote system when comments are enabled". See what I mean? It's going to be one after another after another after another...

    16. Re:Drupal powers... by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      I note that this is dated the same date as the update that fixes this. We'll see what happens. It's going to be one after another after another after another... Is there a release of anything that isn't?

    17. Re:Drupal powers... by bkessels · · Score: 1

      You really need to know what you talk about. The exploits you talk about were only applicable in a very few cases. And even then one could do quite little with them. So far no-one has actually managed to get that root-access that is theoretically possible to get with the exploit. Drupal had all that you talk about. So get the facts... ;)

    18. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      With regards to web application security and software development I know quite well what I am talking about. With regards to Drupal, I am not as concerned with the severity of specific vulnerabilities discovered thusfar, I am showing that their nature and quantity are indicators of an underlying failure in the software development methodology.

    19. Re:Drupal powers... by bkessels · · Score: 1

      No, ou address specific issues. And you make them appear as if they are due to the vary nature/architecture of drupal is wrong. That is what I meant to say with the fact you do not know what you are talking about. Because Drupal /is/ secure in its very nature. And these issues appeared after a long while, on places where we, as drupal developers, gave th community some power. If you leave all security in the very basics, you should disallow ANYONE t connect to any network at all costs, with a Linux kernel. that is the only really secure kernel. But that is simply not an option. So, as soon as you allow a kernel to do some network stuff, you give people power. But people are people. And thus you add insecurity. Drupal has the same problems. It was only in those situations and those set-ups where people used advanced input formatting, and allowed anonymous users to use them, that XSS/JS could be injected. That is the story in a nutshell. So, please, read the code before you judge again. For you are very right about the fact that things should be secure from the very core on; not bolted on top of that core, but Drupal has all that. It is just that you cannot make something 100% secure, yet give power to the users.

    20. Re:Drupal powers... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      Your reasoning as to why something cannot be secure is absurd. I have read the code, I even posted an example of issues with the code in this exact same comment thread, in response to someone else. You are arguing a line of reasoning, "no application can be acceptably secure", that has been disproven by prominent security researchers and software developers. Have you ever read the discussions concerning issues of this nature that have appeared in the bugtraq and webappsec mailing lists over the last five years? You seem to be at least partially uninformed as to what constitutes a well designed web application, from a security standpoint. It's as if you have created your own standard and are oblivious to the discussions that the top minds in the field have had and the conclusions that those discussions have yielded. That is what is seen time and time again in poorly written applications - a disregard for best practices. You have just furthered my example by offering an uninformed argument that erroneously justifies a failure to sanitize all input.

      The specific issues indicate an underlying problem in the way Drupal handles input sanitization. Let's once again look at this one line of Drupal code:

      $edit['subject'] = truncate_utf8(decode_entities(strip_tags(check_out put($edit['comment'], $edit['format']))), 29, TRUE);

      Is $edit['subject'] considered safe to display after this mess of functions is called? Are you sure that the result of stripping tags and then subsequently decoding entities won't result in new tags appearing, created when decoding entities is called? Or is an author who later outputs $edit['subject'] supposed to remember that he needs to re-entity encode it before outputting it to the browser? Why isn't a wrapper function for decoding entities and allowing permissible characters through (versus the fundamentally flawed idea of stripping bad characters) contained in the core drupal code? Why is input sanity left up to the individual module authors to implement?

      Do you understand +yet+ what I am saying?

  18. What is the security of Drupal like? by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Today I was reading an entry in Eugenia Loli-Queru's Slashdot journal. It was discussing the recent defacing of TuxTops.com.

    Now, looking at the source code to the main page of TuxTops.com I noticed that it includes a CSS file "misc/drupal.css". That would lead me to believe that they are using Drupal as their content management system. Please verify this for yourself if you do not believe me.

    My question is: why was their site defaced so easily? Was it because Drupal itself is an inherently insecure system? Or was it just improperly installed?

    Can anybody shed some light on this? I would like to use it, but seeing stuff like that makes me nervous.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:What is the security of Drupal like? by nysus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Security is excellent. However, a recent exploit in a popular open source xml-rpc module that is also used by many other program other than Drupal was recently reported to have a security hole. The Drupal project quickly released a patch to fix this problem last week. Sites that have not applied this patch are vulnerable.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    2. Re:What is the security of Drupal like? by stevey · · Score: 5, Informative

      It could well have been the recently revealed XML-RPC exploit which Drupal appears to have been vulnerable to.

      Debian released an updated Drupal security package today. I'm sure other distributions have also done so, or are about to.

    3. Re:What is the security of Drupal like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late for me... Ouch! I just finished cleaning up the debris from a rootkit installed via this vulnerability. Kind of scary!

  19. Server meltdown? Oh let's /. them by giaguara · · Score: 2, Funny

    Server meltdown? Oh let's /. them now that they are back online.

  20. Well, I offered it to them... by SlashChick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I offered them a free Dual Xeon 2.8GHz server, 1GB RAM, 1x80GB hard drive with 500GB transfer a month, hosted at Simpli (my hosting company). We host several Drupal sites and I'd be happy to have them on board. I asked for a text link back to Simpli. I haven't heard back from them, so I guess they'd rather beg their users for money than take a free dedicated server. I have to say I'm a bit disappointed, but it's their money and their choice.

    1. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have to say I'm a bit disappointed, but it's their money and their choice."

      Eh, what can you do? Offer was on the table, and they chose to take another route.

      Anyways, perhaps one of the reasons they didn't reply to you was the fact that your website doesn't appear to be working (well, it works(?), but all I see is a blank page).

    2. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yikes! Fixed. The database connection broke overnight... strange. Thanks for the heads-up.

    3. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

      That's a nice offer. I gave them 25 euros. You should probably get on the freenode #drupal channel and make the offer.

    4. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by SlashChick · · Score: 1

      "You should probably get on the freenode #drupal channel and make the offer."

      I talked directly to Dries last night on freenode, way before this hit Slashdot. ;)

    5. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by mr_zorg · · Score: 1
      Yikes! Fixed. The database connection broke overnight... strange. Thanks for the heads-up.
      And to think, Simpli touts "100% guaranteed network uptime". Well, I suppose the network probably was up -- just not the servers. :-) What a joke.
    6. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

      Guess he has his own ideas. I gave this morning when I got up. They were at about 20 donations at the time.

    7. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by SlashChick · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was just the simpli.biz website. No client websites or servers were affected.

    8. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by factoryjoe · · Score: 5, Informative

      SlashChick, just wanted to say that we appreciate your offer and wouldn't mind discussing some kind of backup mirroring situation with you.

      The reason why your offer was treated as such was not because we don't appreciate it -- indeed we've had a few offers and we're fortunate to receive them!

      As one of the proponents of this project (which I suggested more than a month ago but only became serious about around the middle of June) I know that there were a number of possibilities that we considered before deciding to go with OSL.

      In particular, I've maintained an excellent relationship with Scott Kveton over there during my time at Spread Firefox. He was an excellent resource and advocate during that time and in fact offered to host Drupal.org sometime back in February when I mentioned the idea to him.

      As part of the arrangement, we needed to purchase the hardware on which drupal.org would live. The $3000 target was set by the following recommended specs, supplied by Scott:

      Dell PowerEdge 1850 1U
      2 x 2.8Ghz Xeon w/ 1Mb cache 800Mhz FSB
      2GB RAM
      2 x 73 GB SCSI disks
      RAID controller for RAID1 (mirror)
      Redundant Power Supply

      From there, Dries (Drupal's founder), Steven Peck, Kieran Lal (of CivicSpace) and myself collaborated on a fundraising strategy, with Dries and Steven writing up the description that ended up on Drupal.org.

      Ironically, or perhaps just as one could have predicted, drupal.org went black for two days just as we were finalizing the copy. With drupal.org down, I presume Dries moved the DNS to another host and posted the text we had.

      13 hours later we more than doubled our goal thanks to the collective economic power of the open source community!

      So in sum, SlashChick, we do really appreciate your offer, but we had already staked out a plan a month ago and drupal.org's going black was simply an oddly timed incident that spurred the community to action! Feel free to get in touch with me to discuss your offer further if you'd like.

    9. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The server may have been free, but the Simpli.biz network was far from headache free.

      SJC2 is a building nobody but bargin basement webhosts want to be in. Not a good home for a growing project.

    10. Re:Well, I offered it to them... by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      Hey Factory,

      Ever since Thursday I have been trying to download fscache(4.6) module for a test install, but have not been able to find the download anywhere on the web.

      Would you point me out where can I find this module? If you have it offline, would you be as kind as to mail it to me at jme at cimex dot com dot mx?

      TIA

      Javier

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
  21. leading cms? by slashdotnickname · · Score: 1

    When you have to claim you're the leading something-or-the-other in the same breath it takes to describe who you are, then you're clearly not there yet. Unable to handle the traffic, that a leader in something-or-the-other would be expected to have, doesn't help either.

    1. Re:leading cms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of weeks ago I had to review a bunch of various CMS to see which one would be the most fitting for a company. I installed and played around with like PHPBB, e107, Etomite, Plone, CMS Made Simple, jaws, Xoops, Mambo and Drupal. Of all of them, I truly liked Drupal the best. Why? Because of their flexibility and their PHP code. Very professional, graceful programming. Something to learn from. I found most other CMS to be narrow, rigid, and extremely difficult to port existing dynamic pages to. While other CMS might have more themes, prettier interface, etc., they are usually bulky and have plenty of vulnerabilities.
      Anyway, another reason to support Drupal is because this is an Open Source project (and a very good one at that), and a reasonable person wouldn't want it to go away thereby reducing the number of choices for people to express themselves .

  22. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Post

  23. Leading CMS headache by 3.2.3 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Drupal is the leading open-source (written in PHP) content management system

    Bollocks. Slightly ahead of Mambo, Drupal is the leading CMS headache, a brittle pile of PHP script kiddie crap which probably caused their shared host to go down, as it did on my old shared host. "After 48 hours," I wouldn't "[still] have [not] responded to [our] support requests," either. I wish I could have back the month of my life extracating myself from Drupal cost me.

    1. Re:Leading CMS headache by VonSkippy · · Score: 1

      Please save me from the same trouble - what solution did you find that was better?

    2. Re:Leading CMS headache by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

      TYPO3?

      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
    3. Re:Leading CMS headache by 3.2.3 · · Score: 1

      Please save me from the same trouble - what solution did you find that was better?

      Plone and a dedicated server.

      It has the disadvantage of needing to know what you are doing, but it was the solution.

      I would reject all PHP CMSes out of hand. An application server was the way to go. Java frameworks were overly cumbersome. Zope/Plone had the perfect separation of content, presentation, and logic. It's been a great experience for me for over two years now. Not perfect. But not a soul sucking headache, either.

    4. Re:Leading CMS headache by phlegmgem · · Score: 1
      It's been a great experience for me for over two years now.
      Drupal has changed quite a lot in the past 2-3 years. It sounds like your problem was not a good fit for Drupal. Instead of complaining about how much Drupal might suck, perhaps you should point out that it is a CMS, not an application server. You'll save people the headache of using a CMS when they should be using an application server.
    5. Re:Leading CMS headache by 3.2.3 · · Score: 1

      Drupal has changed quite a lot in the past 2-3 years.

      The initial release of Drupal was Jan 15, 2001.

      My big Drupal crash was last August. I've been using Plone for over two years (from about the time it was released as well) and it was good to start with. I inherited the Drupal nightmare. For a CMS to be flexible enough, it needs an application server. Plone is a CMS which runs on a Zope application server. Zope is an application server tailor made for CMSes. The whole architecture of Drupal is part of what makes it a mess. Mostly it's just PHP mixing up presentation, content, and logic, making things ultra brittle.

  24. Drupal is pretty good by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

    I just finished a project using drupal. I found it pretty solid CMS. The code is clean and relatively easy to manage.

  25. Your 2 cents have no value. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to believe your advice but, I can't take advice from someone who can't spell ridiculous.

    Your post was ridiculous.

    1. Re:Your 2 cents have no value. by sofar · · Score: 1


      yup I'm a non-native english speaker, but I can order decent hardware with decent support for less. Take off the "dell" label and get Tyan components or 3ware, and you get the same HW warranty as dell, for at least a thousand dollars less.

      Waste your money on Dell and HP, sure you get 3 years of support, but in the 3rd year you wish you had gotten something cheaper and replaced the harware already, instead of calling HP/Dell support over and over because some component has become unreliable.

  26. Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How can they lead the content management industry, when they can't survive a server meltdown? Open source doesn't have to mean "living paycheck to paycheck". It has to mean "open for business". Otherwise, businesses (and sensible personal users) won't rely on it - won't use it. Because when it goes down, we're left hanging.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Largely because it was a shared host. What's the big deal? They just out grew their environment.

    2. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's people like you who start twisting words around that are the real danger to open source software. Open source "has to mean" open for business my ass. It has to mean OPEN SOURCE. Period. You don't work in marketing, by any chance?

    3. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      That's the *reason why* they went down. It doesn't matter whether it's a good reason. Customers (rightly) only care about whether they can rely on them or not. Reliable businesses outgrow their envirnments under a plan. Even when spikes hit, they don't go down - they go to "Plan B". Especially as Drupal is in the exact business that manages this properly - high productivity content management - they really are obligated to uptime. Or they're good software, but not a good business. Which isn't adequate for businesses to rely on. Only sentimental ones which are willing to go down with them.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So when MS went down because of a DOS attack, they makes them a poor business partner? They are the richest company in the world, they should always be up right? My point is that sometimes things happen in business that you cannot plan for. Perhaps they were planning on upgrading. I doubt very much this will have ANY impact on drupal's long term acceptance in the community.

      BTW I find the lectures about what you think customers want somewhat annoying. Customers care about having their own systems up and running. While it might be a cause for concern, it's hardly world ending.

    5. Re:Homeless Business Partners by handelaar · · Score: 1

      You'd be making a good point if either

      a) Drupal was a business or
      b) Drupal provided hosting as a service to customers.

      Sadly, neither is true, and that about does it for your line of argument.

      Any business running Drupal will do just fine, thanks, provided it doesn't have the same crappy host that this project's been stick with recently.

    6. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're an ass. Of course I "work in marketing" - I'm a successful businessman. That doesn't make me a marketdroid; marketing is essential to business. You are a hobbyist - open source doesn't have to be anything to you, except open, and source. But I'm talking about what it needs to be for business, as is perfectly clear for my post. Which is what any "leading" tools company must satisfy. Or it's suitable only for hobbyists, and people like you who are scared of success in the market.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, when MS went down it made them a poor business partner. Because they are so rich, and focused, the question of "will it happen again" is answered with "probably not". Since so much of their products are worse than the competition, the main reason they lead the industry is because "they'll be there to support us next year, too".

      There are other reasons why an MS outage, though "unacceptable", is accepted, while Drupal's is not. Because MS is an monopoly, their downtime weighs against the lack of alternatives, for people locked in to their platform. Drupal doesn't enjoy that advantage, and smart customers will switch. An overloaded server can be planned for: most of us are operating under such plans. Drupal failed, it's important, and you can't admit that.

      I find that you've completely discredited yourself in your apology for Drupal's inadequacy in serving their customers. Customers want reliability - it's one reason we switch to Linux from Microsoft when we can. That means that when they need to get info from the vendor, especially in an emergency, unavailability is a bottleneck they can't mitigate. Only you said it's "world ending", the hyperbolic distortions of someone who isn't interested in the facts, or learning anything. You just want to have it your way, with your fetish for Drupal.

      I have had a lot of success knowing what customers want, and wanting the right things as a customer. What do you know? Where do you get off questioning my insight, without basis? What's your source of authority? Come correct, or don't come at all.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      wtf does their hardware uptime have to do with the quality of their software? they could even not have a website at all and just sell their software on CDs, would that make it any less reliable?

    9. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Drupal is providing a service, software delivery, to its users. It might not be a business, but businesses depend on it. So it has to act professionally, regardless of its technical "business" status. Their uptime is in the critical path for their users, who depend on access to their website, especially in emergencies.

      There's a reason businesses prefer to do business with businesses, rather than hobbyist "projects". Reliability, discipline. When a business has a problem like Drupal's outage, it responds, to ensure customers can rely on it. Drupal will probably respond in keeping with the excuses for their failure promoted in this thread: it's OK, it wasn't our fault, it wasn't our core competency. But since I think Drupal is a good thing for people to use, I want them to be more reliable. Denial of what's important and letting them off the hook doesn't do that. Instead, it opens them up to competition from inferior products from more reliable companies. Which sounds like it's bad for almost everyone, including me, you, Drupal users, and Drupal.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Did I say anything about you being a marketdroid? I am hardly a hobbyist. I have founded several companies and have worked on the business development side of the house for years. My last company was sold to good old VA Software

      "You are a hobbyist - open source doesn't have to be anything to you, except open, and source."

      "Or it's suitable only for hobbyists, and people like you who are scared of success in the market."

      Nice ad hominem attacks. As far this goes, its a minor affair, in fact I would use it as clear selling tool that we have exceeded our goals in growth. We didn't anticipate growth being this strong.

      My point is this is a minor hiccup in a company's growth. As far being a successful businessman I have had more than my fair share of successes and failures.

      Growing pains happen in every company. How you handle them is entirely indicative of the quality of the company.

      Stop it with the ad hominem attacks, it's not helping your argument.

    11. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with the quality of their software. It has something important to do with their reliability as a technology resource. If I can't get to their website when I need an upgrade or technical question answered, I'm screwed, no matter how well their SW would work installed on my server if it were working. I'm talking about the reliability of the project, essential in a vendor or any business partner. If they can't get a new server, and they stop functioning as a project, what happens to everyone who's bought into their software?

      It's open source, so perhaps someone will take over the project. Better than an unreliable proprietary SW project, but not as good as a reliable project with worse SW. Or maybe I could take over the development myself, a cost proposition that I didn't bargain for when I bought into the platform.

      Business is defined by risk management. Dependency on unreliable components is just as bad for business as it is for programming. And Drupal has just demonstrated that the risks are worse than they previously appeared: always bad news in business. I'm apparently doing Slashdotters, naive in legitimate business priorities and realities, a favor for pointing this out. For which I'm getting flamed.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      "I find that you've completely discredited yourself in your apology for Drupal's inadequacy in serving their customers."

      Drupal is a software package. No customers are down as a result. I can certainly admit that Drupal fucked up. With those traffic numbers I would have moved to my own set of boxes awhile ago.

      "I find that you've completely discredited yourself in your apology for Drupal's inadequacy in serving their customers. Customers want reliability - it's one reason we switch to Linux from Microsoft when we can. That means that when they need to get info from the vendor, especially in an emergency, unavailability is a bottleneck they can't mitigate. Only you said it's "world ending", the hyperbolic distortions of someone who isn't interested in the facts, or learning anything. You just want to have it your way, with your fetish for Drupal."

      Dude what fetish? I just used it for one project and was pleasantly surprised. Why all these personal attacks? What Drupal customers haven't been serviced as a result?

      I can question your insight on several grounds. First off I have been on the business development side of the house for years. While this is certainly a problem, it's not the end of the world for Drupal. I have sold open source ecommerce systems since 1994 with the launch Hot Hot Hot, the hot sauce store launched by Presence Information Design. So that's roughly 11 years of sales experience in this particular field.

      I sold an open source software company to good old VA.

      You offer NO credentials about what you do or from what data set you are drawing your conclusions. You haven't established your authority yet.

      Truthfully this is a huge screw up but they are handling it well. So it's hardly world ending for drupal.

    13. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "people like you who start twisting words around"
      "You don't work in marketing, by any chance?"

      You created this market for ad hominem attacks, so you can't have it both ways. Try to pretend that the first attack is on my "twisting", and not an insult to "people like [me]". Or that the marketing remark isn't a personal attack, on a marketdroid. Pretty sleazy rhetorical strategy, and I don't buy it.

      On the point worth discussing, you point out that the company's handling growing pains indicates its quality. Drupal isn't a company, it's a project. Already a risk in depending on them. Their handling of their outage, enabled by relying on a hosting company which has ignored their 72+h of downtime, left their users stranded for a while. Which, if not over a Summer weekend, would have been an even worse source of risk. They were resilient enough to get back up anyway, and have a supportive enough user base that their pleas for help have given them enough money to buy a computer. That kind of management schema is very risky, especially as it seems they were unprepared for the contingency. Though their tech skills salvaged them.

      Plenty of companies succeed despite management blind spots like IT reliability. Having that reliability, even outside one's core competency, is important. Learning from getting poked in the blind spot is an even more important element of a successful organization that will last, that is an acceptable risk level for a company to depend upon. We'll see whether Drupal changes their operations strategy to learn from this lesson. I hope they take criticism from peolple like me, which will make them stronger, rather than apologies for their failures, which helps them not at all.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Dude - You aren't quoting me. I didn't write that. Pay attention to who is posting.

    15. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I have replied to your points in my response to your other post, where you also made them.

      As for my credibility, after 15 years programming, 5 years professionally, I launched a multinational consultancy in Toronto and NYC. We built websites and backend/intranet infosystems for banks, publishing companies, cable companies, and other big businesses. Like NorTel, DeutscheBank, PrenticeHall, the Federal government of Canada, and others with billion dollar organizations depending to some degree on the product I delivered. Many of which I hosted on my datacenter, when not relying on major datacenters for uptime guarantees. As well as dozens of small businesses. I have built multimillion dollar businesses on the web for companies like The Guardian, Nabisco, and other global brands. I have been programmer, trainer, architect, COO, CEO, and business strategy consultant to all kinds of businesses. And the ones which aren't experimenting with R&D (nearly all) all require reliability. Which is a function of corporate operations, management of IT, beyond the quality of the software delivered as the product. I know what I'm talking about, having learned firsthand what happens when you screw up someone's business, even when it isn't "your fault". It is your responsibility, when you accept it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    16. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      To be clear, I started the consultancy (grown to over 50 people) in 1995. That brings me to 15 years pro experience, most of it at the high end, in 25 years wrestling with the business.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Well that certainly helps with your credentials. I guess I could if I so wanted give you a similar list of Fortune 500s we did work with etc. Suffice it to say I have a similar background with a company about 12 people smaller. BTW you did see that you weren't quoting my post? That those two quotes weren't mine right?

    18. Re:Homeless Business Partners by i+wanted+another+nam · · Score: 1

      Yeah? Well my dick is TWELVE inches long! ...Oh, were we being subtle?

      --
      The image is a dream, the beauty is real. Can you see the difference?
    19. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      We have clearly had different experiences with how demanding are businesses of operations reliability of their suppliers. I note for completeness that my consultancy typically included all source code with deliveries, without restriction. Only when we packaged some code for resale in other projects, to lower the price, did we ever require that the customer not redistribute the code (noncompete). We never gave those clauses a second thought after the sale was complete. Also, FWIW, we were the ones who patched the CERN httpd to serve multiple websites from the same host, and published the source into the public domain. For all of 1995, until Netscape published their Commerce Server, our code was running on every "multihome" host, which certainly helped the Bubble expand. During which time we made certain that our servers were up 24/7 for download, documentation and feedback. Not for nothing did I sleep with a pager for 5 years.

      As for the argument about insults, I still don't get it. I replied in that other thread.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    20. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What kind of game are you playing? I responded to an Anonymous Cowards' personal attacks in kind. You responded with a post from an ID, responding to those counterattacks as if mine were directed at you, when they were directed at the AC. So it's hardly to be expected that I could distinguish you from the AC, when you act like it was you.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    21. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      I just saw that AC post. Needless to say I filter out AC posts. I suggest you do since you decided to flame me for someone else's post.

    22. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You can suggest whatever you want. I suggest that if you're going to respond to a post, you make certain that your filters haven't tricked you into thinking that the post to which you're replying is addressing you. At least not if you're going to accuse me of unfair attacks on you, when you're imagining them. Especially if, by so doing, you're escalating a fight you wouldn't want to be in, by inheriting the fight from an anonymous poster who can't be distinguished from you.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    23. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      My fault for filtering AC posts. I suggest you do so too, you will find it less stressful. To be completely fair you did say I had a "fetish" for drupal and was a "hobbyist". Fetish & "hoobyists" a fairly loaded terms. I agree 100% with you for their fuck-up. As one of the founders of my company I carried the old pager for years to moniter the data center. I suspect we differ on the degree to which this will hurt them. Crisis management always defines the quality of a company.

      BTW Ignore the AC trolls my friend.

    24. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're a big dick. So what?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    25. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "Hobbyist" I think is appropriate, given the relative levels of professionalism to which we are subscribing. "Fetish" is another way of saying the same thing, more pointedly, when arguing that lesser criteria than necessary are being used for acceptance. But I'm glad we're beyond that heated rhetoric now. Even if we don't agree, at least we understand each other better :).

      Nah, I eat AC trolls for breakfast. I don't care about getting mud on me when wrestling with a pig: the loophole in the old adage about the pig liking it is that I like it better, especially when I roast their chops ;). It's my way of actually releasing the stress I accumulate from people with whom it's impolitic to argue, even when they're horrendously wrong. It's a weakness for human flesh, but I relish it :).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    26. Re:Homeless Business Partners by ksb · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone doubts your sentiments in an ideal situation, nor do I think that Slashdotters in general are a naive as you make out, whilst passionate an a little biased, Slashdotters do seem to have good knowledge of the realities of the business world.

      The passion and [every so] slight bias is what open source software is all about and these fundamental properties of the people involved also provide a lot of tollerance for emerging projects suffering the odd failure.

      Drupal appears to have a good offering to the OSS community and is obviously outgrowing it's 'hobby' roots and I'd like to think they were making preparations for this transision before it was suddenly forced upon them by the failure of their host.

      Whilst all projects, large and small have to develop contingencies for the un-expected, until they recieve good financial backing from donations or the corporates who would seek the level of service and support you suggest it can be difficult for the average joe with a good idea to protect themselves against everything. However this most certainly should not put such people off developing their ideas for the benefit of the community.

      The afore mentioned tollerance helps this process and has created a unique environment for us all to freely express our ideas.

    27. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      I don't think the levels of professionalism are actually all that different. If Drupal had been my project, it would have never gone down EVER. Blaming your upstream provider is one thing but people have an expectation of sites being up. I expect systems to stay up years at a time with proper maintaince. Many of the systems we have done are entering their 5th & 6th years running continously with minor patch downtime for portions of the cluster.

      I also expect people to do capacity planning and notice that, "Hey maybe we should do something about this slow ass hosting like getting our own small cluster." My suspicion is that they don't have a sys admin and were afraid to make the leap. (or just not enough cash to buy the machine)

      I suspect that this project will recover from this hiccup. They have gotten pretty popular (The Google Page Rank of drupal.org is 8) but are not deployed in too many corporations. Many of their customer testimonials are smaller installations.

      I tried their system after going on a CMS binge where I played virtually every product on the market. Despite it being in PHP I was pleasantly surprised by this system. Maybe they will grow into MySQL or maybe they will wither away. I chipped in to help them as I have other projects (like perl.org).

    28. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      If the "customers" of this free, open source project even remotely care, then $3,000 shouldn't be a problem for them at all. An unlimeted license for Movable Type, which as I understand it is a similar system, goes for $100: at that rate only 30 users would be necessary to foot the bill.

      But the point is that it isn't a product for sale, and they do not have or even need a "customer" relationship. It is given away for free by volunteers, and they aren't required to donate their money too, just because they donated their time. That would be like some hobo at a soup kitchen complaining that he had to walk a few miles to get his free meal instead of being driven by one of the volunteers.

    29. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'm passionate myself ;).

      Further, you've given me an opportunity to commend Drupal, and the OSS community of which we're all members. A traditional corporation that went through a catastrophe like this probably wouldn't survive. Because all it would have to rely on would be its revenues, which would dry up after such an outage (especially if they hadn't reserved enough to redeploy). And investment, which would be an even worse outlook. But Drupal could naturally request help from its users, who have resources, skills and money to offer. Especially the $6000 in donations they received in 14 hours, which few small businesses would be able to muster, without damaging or stressing their customer relations. Instead, Drupal has probably tightened its relationships with its community.

      That dynamic bodes very well for OSS competition, without the "all or nothing" heavy costs of traditional business. It's decentralized, can reverse customer/supplier relationships in a heartbeart, when appropriate, and is run on the value of the relationships, not solely the value of a dollar in hand.

      Both sides of my analysis are important insights into the state of OSS today. It's got to grow, to become more reliable, to fit into the business socket created by its proprietary predecessors. But it's bringing new advantages to the niches. My criticisms are made in the spirit of improving the environment, constructively, with positive recommendations in the face of failures. I want this to work, so I offer advice on what my experience tells me will help.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    30. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "suspect that this project will recover from this hiccup. They have gotten pretty popular (The Google Page Rank of drupal.org is 8) but are not deployed in too many corporations. Many of their customer testimonials are smaller installations."

      I agree. I also think that their sector distribution is related to exactly the kinds of risks we've been talking about. When they grow up enough that a burnt hosted server isn't even noticeable, due to failover planning, they'll expand their corporate base. With such a lead mostly in the grassroots, they're poised for greatness. I hope they can take criticism like mine constructively, because I want them, and other worthwhile OSS projects, to succeed and survive. So I can use them :).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    31. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Or like someone who depended on "free" garbage collection going on strike for a week complaining? I have not made any argument about Drupal being "worth the money". There are plenty of other costs in using 3rd party SW, like the cost of switching to something else when it can't be relied upon. OSS projects that want acceptance by businesses and serious individuals must be reliable. If their volunteer/donation system actually works, that's great. In this case, a widely deployed system suffered from users unable to reach its distributors (and documentation, upgrades, support discussions, etc) for some time, due to the failure of their model. Hopefully they'll learn from the experience, and we'll all have a more robust environment in which to work. Including those other projects that learn from them.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    32. Re:Homeless Business Partners by i+wanted+another+nam · · Score: 1

      Oh, get over yourself.

      --
      The image is a dream, the beauty is real. Can you see the difference?
    33. Re:Homeless Business Partners by X.25 · · Score: 1

      Drupal is providing a service, software delivery, to its users. It might not be a business, but businesses depend on it. So it has to act professionally, regardless of its technical "business" status. Their uptime is in the critical path for their users, who depend on access to their website, especially in emergencies.

      Are you Drupal user? If yes, then please switch to something else and stop bleething. If not, then please use something else and stop bleething.

      You obviuosly have no idea what Drupal is, and the fact they could be down 1 month is meaningless. Most people care if Drupal on THEIR OWN servers is running, not if the Drupal website is running.

      But then again, you're a "businessman", and nobody else here is - so you must be the one who collected all the wisdom on this planet...

    34. Re:Homeless Business Partners by X.25 · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with the quality of their software. It has something important to do with their reliability as a technology resource. If I can't get to their website when I need an upgrade or technical question answered, I'm screwed, no matter how well their SW would work installed on my server if it were working.

      Blah blah, blah. Blah. Blah blah blah, blah blah. Blah.

      That's about how useful your comments are. You must be a PhD...

    35. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Fuck you.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    36. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yap yap yap. Whereas your useful comment is the talk of the mailroom.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    37. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Let me reiterate this point for you then... Their website has nothing to do with the reliability of their software. Two completely different things. When their new host gets hit by a meteor that won't be their fault either.

    38. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      While your post is merely average flaming. How is my post a troll?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    39. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Well, if *you* are a businessman, you are a bad one - I never claimed a monopoly on the profession, just expertise. You don't understand that both the product, and its suppliers, must be reliable for a business to rely on it. You're not much of anything, because you think that a desire for a good product to be supported by a reliable organization means switching to something else, rather than telling the organization what it needs to provide to serve me, and people like me. Which is to say: people with money and sense. Unlike some others in this thread, like you.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    40. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Let me quote the sentence that you don't seem to be capable of understanding. It's as simple a statement as possible, so I won't be bothering to help you again, except to point out their software isn't all that people rely on when they use their software. They also rely on the project.

      "It has nothing to do with the quality of their software. It has something important to do with their reliability as a technology resource."

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    41. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      I don't know where they have free garbage collection, it has always been a municipal thing everywhere I have been, and the strikes were because their union decided they weren't making enough money. Garbagemen aren't volunteers.

      The point is, people are donating their skilled labor, and often not for the reasons you would think, which is apparently to "gain userbase". I have never used this particular program, and don't know anybody who is working on it, but I bet that they have different motives than that.

      This is not a business: viewing it that way isn't very enlightening.

    42. Re:Homeless Business Partners by darkonc · · Score: 1

      MS probably is a bad business partner (they seem pretty good at slitting throats of customers and 'business partners' alike). However I would admit that that has nothing to do with the survivability of their website.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    43. Re:Homeless Business Partners by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that if you were running a business which relied on Drupal you would be sensible to arrange some kind of support with the core developers rather than just surf onto their website every time your business requirements changed ?

    44. Re:Homeless Business Partners by robnauta · · Score: 1
      Don't you think that if you were running a business which relied on Drupal you would be sensible to arrange some kind of support with the core developers rather than just surf onto their website every time your business requirements changed ?

      Why would any serious business rely on a company that can't even suffer a small setback of a few $1000, like a computer breaking down.
      I'd be scared if I had a business that relied on another company and that company would immediately suspend its development, take its webpage offline and relies on donations and fundraisers whenever some hardware failed.
      It's no fun going to a website for support only to see a static page saying oh no, our 200 GB harddisk crashed, we need your support. Donate money to ... now, or else we're going under.

    45. Re:Homeless Business Partners by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      First of all, you are not relying on the Drupal website - whether it is working or not is irrelevant to the performance of the Drupal CMS.

      Although I can't see any obvious scenarios where a business would rely on a CMS such a business would be wise to realise that it's the core developers who are important when it comes to the Drupal CMS installation they are using and buy some kind of support contract with them.

      Lastly, being Open Source it does not matter if everyone involved in Drupal gets bored and goes off to do other things since you will have everything you need to do whatever you want with the software.

      Even more lastly Drupal is not a company and any business person unable to make that distinction is unlikely to be in business very long.

    46. Re:Homeless Business Partners by i+wanted+another+nam · · Score: 1

      Oh, that does it. Now I'm gonna go cry. Thanks a lot mister! This is me sobbing.

      --
      The image is a dream, the beauty is real. Can you see the difference?
    47. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's not a perfect metaphor, but apt anyway: you don't pay directly for garbage collection, but it's part of the cost of living in a town. Likewise, you don't pay for free SW, but there is an indirect path of your money for other services to its providers. Certainly a closer analogy than the one to which I responded. Maybe I should have replied within their frame: it's more like a poor person depending on a regular ride to the soup kitchen, so they only know about the one across town. When the ride disappears unexpectedly, they go hungry. The person offering the ride, creating the dependency, has an obligation once they created it.

      The point is that the measure of how much a business depends on a project like Drupal isn't the price of its SW. It's the degree to which they depend on it, like needing to get documentation, downloads, user discussions - ongoing support. Businesses sensibly avoid companies which will disappear once the business depends on their software, regardless of their "motives" (which are largely irrelevant to businessmen). Drupal shook the necessary confidence with this unprofessional downtime. You can say that businesses which expect professionalism from Drupal, which is merely a volunteer project with no guarantees they'll be operating Monday morning, are making a bad decision. I'd agree. Especially after this debacle shows what can go wrong. Unless Drupal changes their operations to reduce the risk of this outage happening again. Which would be professional of them, regardless of their business status.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    48. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The Drupal project provides this website as the way to contact the core developers. And to get the other support info which is necessary to use the Drupal package in one's business.

      Take a look at all the useful, but abandoned, OSS projects that no one uses now. Because "just the SW" is important only to geeks, hobbyists, and collectors. Businesspeople need to know "when I have a problem, who do I call?" or something similar. Do you run a business?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    49. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Now, if you'll just go to your room and think about how to act in public next time, I'll stop lauging in your face.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    50. Re:Homeless Business Partners by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Businesspeople need to know "when I have a problem, who do I call?"

      Isn't that what I have just said, twice now ?

    51. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
      100% Flamebait

      Just because this thread is full of Drupal fans who don't care about how businesses rely on a team, not just the SW they could download sometime last week (but not this week, because the website is down), doesn't mean they should flame me. And it certainly doesn't mean that the comment is "Flamebait", whatever that means. Does it mean "I'm a nerd with some mod points, and I disagree, but I know that you'll destroy my weak argument, even if I post as AC, so I'll anonymously mod you down, because I don't even have the balls to flame you"? Yep, that's it. TrollMods can't argue, so they mod down anonymously.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    52. Re:Homeless Business Partners by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't see that you've answered that meaningfully. You've said that they should "make a deal with the core developers for support". That's what the Drupal website is, which is why its unreliability is a problem. How can you dismiss the website reliability while agreeing that businesses need reliable support from the team, which is represented by the website? While simultaneously making the argument that it's the SW that matters, and the ability to work with the team not at all?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  27. Already hit fundraising target! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the single page, it says:

    Fundraise status

    Start date:
    13 hours 5 min ago

    Received:
    $6468 USD

    Target:
    $3000 USD

    Last updated:
    2 min 56 sec ago

    MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Already hit fundraising target! by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      So where does the extra money go? A nicer server? A reserve fund? To the developers?

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:Already hit fundraising target! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another server! And Hookers! And Blackjack!

      Ah screw the server and Blackjack.

      Ah screw the whole damned thing.

    3. Re:Already hit fundraising target! by FuckTheOSUOSL · · Score: 0, Troll

      Probably to pay the "protection" fee at their new host.

    4. Re:Already hit fundraising target! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drupal should use the extra money to spring for some redundant hosting elsewhere. Remember kids, "[Downtime] is a sign of our success."

    5. Re:Already hit fundraising target! by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Hookers.

      +++
      My new Home

  28. Re:What was drupal? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for wasting my time. You do much for their cause.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  29. Drupal rocks by nysus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a minor contributor to the Drupal project, I can tell you it rocks. It's a very well written piece of code. Much more than a CMS, it's a platform on which communities can be launched and mini applications can be written. I believe that Drupal could help revolutionize web site development for inidividuals, small non-profits, and small businesses. It's an extremely flexible and powerful platform. What's more, the main developers of Drupal are pure to the free software philosophy.

    When the site comes back up, you should check it out.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    1. Re:Drupal rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe after you have been working with it for several months.

      I attempted to setup a simple knowledge management site with Drupal recently. Parts of the documentation are out of date and incomplete. It took me quite some time to figure out that the default install of Drupal doesn't even include a module that will do a taxonomy menu. Admittedly, Drupal has a lot of modules, but the learning curve is pretty steep, and it isn't as end user friendly as many other CMS systems.

      In comparision, Textpattern is dead logical and easy to setup and use, assuming you can live with its limitations.

      Expression Engine, although not free, is one of the best CMS's I've found. If you are doing a commercial project, I would put this at the top of your short list.

  30. It could have been a multitude of things... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    ...such as they could be using AWStats which recently provided a possible attack vector. They could have any other unsecure scripts running (phpbb et al). If they are on a shared host that hasn't locked down the environment (according to reverse DNS there's 4 sites on their machine).

    Or it may have been drupal, who knows.

    From what I've seen Drupal is one of the better written PHP blog/cms/portals out there (John Lim, author of PHP ADODB also seems to think so, pointing out several things like how damn small it is compared to other packages that provide the same functionality).

    As always, YMMV.

    --
    I am NaN
  31. Slashdot Money Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Received:
    $6468 USD
    Well, when it was posted on slashdot it was 2600+USD :p Sounds like they got 4k$ in a few minutes

  32. Re:What was drupal? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, they are asking for money. If I'm to donate MY money the damned project better benefit ME.

    Its pretty simple.

    Why should i have to search for 'more info' when they are asking for donations? A responsible 'news service' would happen to explain what the hell the subject was about. Other than just a blurb 'we are drupal and we want your money'.

    Get off your high horse, idiot. Who the hell do you think YOU are? Not someone with some sense, obviously.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  33. How does it compare to Mambo? by Gallamine · · Score: 1

    I just moved my website, GoRobotics.net (website about robotics) to Mambo.

    How does Drupal compare to Mambo?

    --
    RobotBox - Robot projects from around the world
    1. Re:How does it compare to Mambo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: How does Drupal compare to Mambo?

      A: you can actually get Drupal to work.

      *ducks*

      (Seriously tho, I spent a lot of time trying to get Mambo to work on my webhoster's server, only to find that it demands rather low PHP security settings and therefor won't work on just any server. Drupal works fine on whatever I've tried to install it on. Also, Drupal is apparently much more modular and OO-ish, so that it's real real easy to add and modify whole parts at a go to do what you need/want. I didn't find Mambo as easy for a lay person (read:non-PHP programmer) to do what was needed/wanted. Just a note from a happy Drupal user.)

    2. Re:How does it compare to Mambo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing that Drupal has over Mambo is that you can actually customize the HTML it generates. I was agast when I saw that Mambo just hardcodes everything except the every-page boilerplate. Drupal has made me much happier.

    3. Re:How does it compare to Mambo? by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      There are many excellent and rather honest discussions on this comparison, which happens more than any other on the Drupal forums. I'd point to them, but as the server is down.... You might Google it in a couple of days.

    4. Re:How does it compare to Mambo? by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      As a PH programmer I prefer Mambo, the development framework is just a lot nicer to work with (for me at least). Drupal seriously kicks arse in terms of server resources though, it really is very very fast.

  34. Re:What was drupal? by m50d · · Score: 1

    The point is that html supports this handy thing called links. You have made good use of them, but the article submitter could have done so. If the average slashdotter is going to have to use google to find out what it is (and judging by the number of "what is it" posts, in this story they do) then the submitter should include a link to the relevant result.

    --
    I am trolling
  35. Not really... by Phil+John · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...seeing as the main drupal tarball is only ~450k.

    --
    I am NaN
  36. /. effect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, their server couldn't handle the strain and now we've /. them.

    Wonder if they'll see the funny side?

  37. Not "rediculous" by HardCase · · Score: 2, Informative

    xfce just got donated a new server from 2x.com For less than 1600 dollars. 3000? gimme a break!

    I think that Drupal wants something more than a toy. A box full of a bunch of no-name, el-cheapo hardware isn't really going to cut it. $3K for a low to mid level, brand name server with some guts to it and a real warranty is a fair price.

    -h-

    1. Re:Not "rediculous" by sofar · · Score: 1

      umph?

      well that 1600 includes an intel mobo, and a hardware raid setup, as well as 3 years of warranty.

      wouldn't call that el-cheapo. For "el-cheapo" I could get well over 4 1U rackmount servers for 3000$.

  38. CivicSpace is a distribution by UnConeD · · Score: 4, Informative

    Today, CivicSpace is a distribution of Drupal: their core is unforked, and their modules are developed and stored in the main Drupal repository. They contribute patches to the main project as well as work on their own stuff.

  39. donations? by dlane · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to make a donation? Drupal is a great project and an impressive community.

  40. THE ANSWER...Re:How does it compare to Mambo? by alexandreracine · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is your one stop place to compare CMS ... cmsmatrix.org

    --
    No sig for now.
    1. Re:THE ANSWER...Re:How does it compare to Mambo? by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      Sorry to say, but it looks decidely rigged.

      Plain Black, the company behind WebGUI, runs CMSMatrix. Whenever WebGUI gets some spangly new feature, the list of criteria that each CMS is measured against is updated to include said spangly feature.

      Because of the some of weird, specific criteria listed (eg. 'Job Posting' and 'Classifieds', two items that any CMS worth its salt should be able to do without requiring specific plugins), and the fact that Plain Black tailors the features list to make their CMS look wonderful, it's no surprise that WebGUI always comes out on top when you compare it with the other CMS's listed on the site.

      (Disclaimer, opinions are my own and not of my employer, etc.)

    2. Re:THE ANSWER...Re:How does it compare to Mambo? by ArizonaJer · · Score: 1
      Or, if you care to try out any of dozens of CMS's, go to:

      http://www.opensourcecms.com/

      A very handy site that allows you to work with live demos as either an administrator or a regular user. And it's kept up to date with the latest versions of the CMS's.

      --
      Jeremy Butler
      www.ScreenSite.org
      www.TVCrit.com
  41. Drupal got 11 Google "Summer of Code" developers by nysus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To the naysayers out there, you should know that Drupal got 11 "Summer of Code" developers. Do the folks at Google obviously think very highly of this open source project.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

  42. Maybe this could help -- and it's completely free by Synli · · Score: 1, Insightful
    --
    "Two things inspire me to awe -- the starry heavens above and the moral universe within." - Albert Einstein
  43. Re:.....wtf by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Far from true. I've worked with a large company that used a CMS (Interwoven Teamsite). Just about every enterprise website is CMS powered. And for many good reasons:

    - separate content and code
    - portability (apply a different presentation, and you can have xml output, html, wml, plain text, pdf, doc, ps, etc. etc)
    - management (most content contributors don't know anything about html. Only the content.

    IMHO above comment is a troll.

  44. yes well, where were you last month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes and where were you before the actual problem? This was already in the works for the last few weeks.

    It is better to OWN your core resources and leverage the other stuff that OSL is offering. They also provide mirroring, 24x7 admin staff familier with and specializing in open source software.

    OSL does NOT REQUIRE an AD for this service. IT's just what they do. What happends when Drupal goes beyond 500GB/month? All this for the price of owning a server. I own my server and you seem to own yours.

    For four years a very few people have born the expense of this while growing at a phenominal rate. While lots of happy users [and some that chose other products :) ]

    Your post just seems a little .... unfortunate.

  45. OT, but I can't help myself... by nsayer · · Score: 1, Insightful
    From the sig...

    You can meet many former 'homosexuals'; you will never meet a former 'African-American'."

    Are they trying to say that I'll never meet Michael Jackson?

    Burn, Karma, Burn...

  46. Re:Drupal got 11 Google "Summer of Code" developer by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
    I highly doubt that being a part of the Summer of Code means Google is spooging over the project.

    Both FreeBSD and NetBSD got projects, both GNOME and KDE got projects, both Ubuntu and Fedora Core got projects and both Perl and Python got projects. Each of those pairing are opposing projects, they just had interesting ideas that someone at Google liked.

    So, I hardly see this as Google being infatuated with Drupal, more likely Drupal got a few proposals that interested the team that had to select from the 8k ideas. Maybe if other crappy little PHP CMSes had applied with ideas that seemed not only possible but useful there would be other ones in the Summer of Code.

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
  47. Re:.....wtf by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

    A CMS solves the problem of having 30 (or 300000, Slash is a CMS) people modify the site at the same time. Try doing that with flat html or custom written php. It also simplifies the routine management of the site, like archiving and indexing old news items (or blog posts, or whatever other C youre M'ing).

  48. Re:.....wtf by ant_slayer · · Score: 1

    My apologies if I am way off base here, but it sounds like web programming means much less to you than it does to me. The great advantage of using a CMS is that I, the 1337 developer-dude, am not responsible for all the content on the site. If I wanted to spend 8 times the time on every project so that there are spiffy, user-friendly ways for the tech-unsavvy in my organization to be able to put up new content, I could do it.

    But... somehow... I don't seem to have that sort of motivation... Actually, it's not a motivation thing. Ultimately, my time is worth more than building maintenance infrastructure that eventually starts to look an awful lot like a CMS.

    -Ant Slayer-

  49. 10-15 month payback? Buy, don't rent by billstewart · · Score: 1

    They're being offered free colo and bandwidth. If they were to rent that for $300/month, they'd have spent $3000 in 10 months (or 15 months, if they're paying $200/month.) That's not very long - it's much better financially to buy the hardware and take the free monthly. Also, it's probably much easier to raise funds for a one-time item like this than to beg for rent money every month.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  50. Typo3 is best - Drupal one step behind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best? Nha, I think Typo3 is the best CMS system I have tried so far. Done my time in the hell of commercial systems and tested a few systems.

    Typo3 is the best - but lets give Drupal some cash. Competetion is good!

  51. WTF? by n3k5 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    if you need some sort of "content management system" to power your website, you probably aren't the type of person who should be having a web site. It only takes 30 minutes or so to custom build something that does exactly what you want it to [...]
    Are you saying every web site out there should run on software written ad hoc, only for this one site, and every developer who needs more than 30 minutes to build it is an untalented loser?
    [...] rather than spending probably hours configuring some bizarre conglomeration of weird things, that you'll then have to spend hours trying to figure out the code, if you have to make changes at that level.
    I see, so you were unable to find one of the CMSs that run admirably right out of the box/package and offer lots of great features, and now you're pissed at CMSs in general and refuse to touch any of them again? There are several open source solutions you can get into at the source level in just one afternoon, which pays off in days and weeks of time saved every time you need to make a change or set up another site. I particularly like systems like Antville and Textpattern that let you change large parts of their own code right within your site itself. These aren't full blown, enterprise grade CMSs, but as these take months to develop, that's not what you're thinking of anyway. In 30 minutes you can write a little CGI script, but that won't offer validated HTML and CSS that works with pretty much every user agent, secure user accounts with multiple levels of privileges, etc. etc. Furthermore, your notion that only software developers should have web sites is just plain bonkers.

    Or maybe there was some misunderstanding you could clear up?
    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    1. Re:WTF? by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1
      Furthermore, your notion that only software developers should have web sites is just plain bonkers.

      It's not "bonkers". It's asinine.

      Your comments are right on! I'd like to extend them a bit more, if you don't mind...

      The main advantage of setting up a CMS, in my opinion, is that it allows you to write code instead of managing the *content* of a site you already set up. Let someone else manage the content! Even if you have to spend a day or two training the user to use the CMS, you will save yourself how many hours in mindless tinkering later when they want to change "thier" to "their" or add the latest marketing drivel to the site.

      Developers everywhere should push the CMS as if it were God's gift to the user (in my opinion); they are to web pages what any Desktop Publishing software is to print pages - a user-friendlier way of bringing content to a particular medium. It lowers the barrier of entry and lets content producers do what they do best (produce content) and system producers do what they do best (develop systems).

  52. Drupal sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Korea, only old people use Drupal.

    In Soviet Russia, content manages you.

  53. Re:Drupal got 11 Google "Summer of Code" developer by nysus · · Score: 1

    Did I ever use the word "infatuated"?

    You don't think being among the 40 from over 8,000 ideas doesn't give the project some kind credibility?

    Me thinks you have some kind of axe to grind. Sorry.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

  54. Re:Renting a dedicated box? NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drupal is NOT currently renting the box. One of the MAINTAINERS has been providing the hosting on his business server that he owns and the box it is on for FREE for a few years. But hosting your hobby site and your clients on the same box that gets 100GB traffic and 3 million page hits a month is starting to stretch the resources of 2-4 people.

    Thanks for your concern and involvement.

  55. Oregon State University by suparjerk · · Score: 1


    Thanks, OSU. Go Beavers!
    </beaver pride>

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  56. Heh. by MoogMan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Fundraise status

    Start date:
    14 hours 27 min ago

    Received:
    $6468 USD

    Target:
    $3000 USD

    Last updated:
    1 hours 24 min ago

    1. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You website's weird.

  57. $3k for a basic rackmount box or hosting? Uh, no. by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    $3K for a low to mid level, brand name server with some guts to it and a real warranty is a fair price.

    No, it's really not a fair price. $2k will get you a 1U (assuming you pay by space, which is common at colos), 3Ghz P4, 2GB, 2x80GB SATA w/RAID controller, from Dell. Including 3 years of next-day on-site service. That's a pretty damn nice box; maybe you'd like to trade in 1GB of that RAM for a pair of 120's or 200's, but you get the idea. If that's not enough horsepower for an installation of drupal, some mailing lists, CVS/SVN repository, and a website...then something is wrong. Furthermore, much of Dell's rackmount boxes start at around $1K...and that's only if you need rackmount. If someone is offering up a shelf in a colo or their private datacenter and a minitower isn't a problem, $1k gets you an equally nicely-equipped system as the $2k rackmount I spec'd out above.

    Oh, and three grand is also almost 3 years of $100/month hosting (which would be VERY steep hosting!)

    A box full of a bunch of no-name, el-cheapo hardware isn't really going to cut it.

    When you're an open-source community project, you take what you can get. If you're homeless, you don't whine about how the roof leaks in the house someone handed you keys to, and you don't go asking for $500,000 for a "nice house with some really nice carpets".

  58. Leading CMS ? Came on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find rather hard to think that Drupal is the leading CMS right now. I'm not setting a flamebait here only that I wanted to use a CMS and looked at the Drupal PHP code and it was really ugly (talk about php and html mix, no internationalization, etc).

    I found the same hard-coded html, etc in Mamboserver.

    I finally picked Typo3 although that was a little too complex for my needs.

    I would really like something like Plone in the PHP world since PHP hosting is _everywhere_.

    PS: Does anyone actually check these "leading" announcements ? Over 1000 users means leading or just the fact that some sites you visit ? Really.

    1. Re:Leading CMS ? Came on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Drupal PHP code and it was really ugly (talk about php and html mix, no internationalization, etc).

      Are you on crack?

      It's well-designed, succinct, and fully internationalized. And it's the best PHP code I've seen (and I've seen a lot).

    2. Re:Leading CMS ? Came on! by lux55 · · Score: 1

      Feel free to check out our CMS, called Sitellite. I won't claim it's the leading CMS in PHP by any means, but its code is architected and mostly pretty clean (there are a few rough spots around the edges, but the core is very much OOP + MVC). Plus we just released a major new version with lots of great stuff in it. For more info, see:

      http://www.sitellite.org/

      Disclaimer: My sig links to the company that supports Sitellite and funds its main developers (incl. me).

    3. Re:Leading CMS ? Came on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely right. I looked at the code half a year ago and was devastated. This thing is a piece of crap. Hey, they even got a function called "l" (or something similar) in the global namespace! If that is not dead ugly...

  59. Wow by jmazzi · · Score: 0

    "The Drupal community responded faster than we could imagine: in just 13 hours we raised over $6000 USD"

    Wow, that was quick. Now whos gonna help me raise $3000 for my new G5 workstation I want?

  60. Re:Renting a dedicated box? NOT by moz25 · · Score: 1

    that gets 100GB traffic
    I don't know where drupal is hosting, but 100GB is not that much bandwidth if you're hosting in the U.S.

  61. Re:new hardware.. by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Nah, go for the sun V40z.. course they need to raise a few more K's for that, but with the ability to run 4 dual core opterons......

    tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  62. OSL Leeches? by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

    A lot of "successful" sites seem to be hosted at OSL. But really, how successful are these sites if they can't even raise $3,000 for a new server (before posting on Slashdot)? And how would tuition-payers at Oregon State University feel about funding such a service (yes, yes, they would probably say "open-what?" but once you explain it...) There are a lot of benefits of making a business out of this software stuff.

    1. Re:OSL Leeches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And how would tuition-payers at Oregon State University feel about funding such a service (yes, yes, they would probably say "open-what?" but once you explain it...)

      Clearly you have never been to Corvallis or OSU.

    2. Re:OSL Leeches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you how they feel, pissed off. Although like you said most of them have no clue what Open Source means tuition is a problem at OSU and the OSUOSL with all it's extra "FLUF" isn't helping things.

      Here are a few choice articles I found in the student paper.

      http://barometer.orst.edu/vnews/display.v/ART/2005 /05/11/42822d7d4d8aa?in_archive=1
      http://barometer.orst.edu/vnews/display.v/ART/2005 /06/22/42b99bf838032?in_archive=1
      http://barometer.orst.edu/vnews/display.v/ART/2005 /06/22/42b993bdeb909?in_archive=1
      http://barometer.orst.edu/vnews/display.v/ART/2005 /05/19/428cc099cf15e?in_archive=1

      I could go on, but you get the point. The OSUOSL is wastefull. OSU could provide the same services for Open Source for a reduced cost if they'd only cut out all of the middle managment.

    3. Re:OSL Leeches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They *DID* provide the same services for open source. And at a much higher quality I might add. After the OSL opened their doors and took it over, theyre linux mirrors got slow to the point that i had to use ones at differnt locations in order to patch debian. Actually maybe I should thank them. I would not have tried out Freebsd if they hadn't taken over. (And I don't mean to start a flame war. I just happen to like it better.)

    4. Re:OSL Leeches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >and the OSUOSL with all it's extra "FLUF" isn't
      >helping things.

      Yeah, they pretty much are a bunch of fluffers. ;)

    5. Re:OSL Leeches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like they're just doing their part to help open source "Go Big!" (And stay there.)

  63. Drupal-powered sites in Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever you Google search and you see the distinctly '{Page Title}|{Web Site Name}' text pattern littered among the results, you can be sure that it's a drupal-powered site. Their number being quite a handful is an indicator of drupal's popularity among the web's denizens.

  64. Smartass Remark by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    Have you tried eBay? GoodWill?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  65. Re:.....wtf by keepr · · Score: 2

    That is just absurd. Your saying that if people cannot write their own CMS they shouldn't have a website? Some people spend less than 6 hours a day in front of a computer, does that entitle them to anything less on the internet?

    Go troll somewhere, please.

    --
    Slashdot taught me how to use the preview button!
  66. Re:Maybe this could help -- and it's completely fr by ksb · · Score: 1

    I know what you're saying but don't you think it would be a little like Ford giving their sales force vauxhalls as company cars ;)

  67. Re:What was drupal? by TekPolitik · · Score: 1
    Excuse me, they are asking for money. If I'm to donate MY money the damned project better benefit ME.

    If you don't know about it, then it's not you they are asking for money. I was ready to get out my credit card and make a donation, then I found they already have what they need. They got the donations so quickly (in less than 12 hours, it seems) because there are more than enough people who use, depend on and value the software.

  68. It's a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame when a drag queen gets old and can no longer carry on the schtick. Winding up homeless though... Somebody should have told him to lay off the coke.

  69. Re:Drupal got 11 Google "Summer of Code" developer by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
    You said that they think very highly of a CMS, I said you're wrong. Where, pray tell, is my ax I am supposedly in need of honing?

    You make it seem as though Google cares for this project in some manner, I pointed out that they obviously aren't taking favourites here. This was that the people that wanted to work on Drupal projects came up with ideas that people at Google thought interesting.

    If you want to call an apple an orange you're not going to have me agreeing with you, cause they're not the same.

    Apology accepted, next time just skip the attempt at undermining my character and you won't need to apologise though.

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
  70. Re:What was drupal? by JasdonLe · · Score: 1

    Touche. :)

    --
    ** A Sketch a Week **
    http://www.sketchplease.com
  71. Re:.....wtf by Salamander · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It only takes 30 minutes or so to custom build something that does exactly what you want it to, rather than spending probably hours configuring some bizarre conglomeration of weird things, that you'll then have to spend hours trying to figure out the code, if you have to make changes at that level.

    Bull. I used to write all of the code for my own website. It probably took me about a week of full-time-equivalent work, and it worked OK, but that's still a far cry from half an hour. Don't give me any of that crap about it being because you're a better programmer, either. I work on kernels and distributed systems for a living, and have done for over a decade. Web programming is something I do as a break from real work because it's so easy by comparison. Nonetheless, all you can get in half an hour is something that sucks. If you want something that's modular and maintainable, that takes more time. If you want something that's database-efficient, that takes more time...and flat-file-based systems are even worse so don't go there. If you want something that's standards-compliant, that takes more time...and your main page generated 130 errors when I ran it through the W3C validator. If you want it not to look like crap (again unlike your site) that takes more time. If you want to have features like markup in comments and comment preview, decent archive management, categories, and search (again unlike...) that takes more time. If you want to do all of those things and have it be secure, that takes more time; not knowing how to implement features securely is a poor excuse for having a low-functionality site. Do all that in under the week it took me, and I'll be impressed. So far, not even close.

    My guess, based on your comment, is that you're another victim of the rewrite bug that often afflicts junior programmers. Writing code is not necessarily more efficient than reading other people's, but it is generally more fun so kiddies always want to rewrite everything in sight. What they end up with isn't usually any better, though. Most code that's written as an excuse not to understand something that already existed sucks far worse than what it replaces. That's why most of the people who roll their own website never even have the balls to make the result available for others to see. They know that it's a lot easier to claim superiority than to prove it.

    if you need some sort of "content management system" to power your website, you probably aren't the type of person who should be having a web site.

    That's the most offensive thing about your post, and why I went out of my way to be offensive right back. Sure, maybe you and I can (with varying degrees of success) write code to do the things that a typical weblog does, but why should we be the only ones to have sites? Why shouldn't high-school students and grandmothers have them too? Sure, most of what they write is crap, but so is most of what geeks write (including here). What purpose is served by having someone who might be able to contribute code in some other domain that you know nothing about have to learn your most treasured skills as the price of entry to the world of website ownership? What if their contribution is something other than code - like scientific knowledge or political insight? Aren't those valuable too? Thinking that everyone should value what you value is beyond elitist, and contrary to the spirit of free enterprise. It's just a crutch for insecurity, not a valid or useful attitude. It's almost as pathetic as posting fake-IQ-test results to your blog.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  72. Summer of Code Funds by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    $3000, eh?

    Well, according to this, they're going to be receiving 11 * $500 = $5500 for participating in Google's Summer of Code.

    So...

  73. Re:What was drupal? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If you are the example of 'their targeted audience', then i hope they go under.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  74. Why worry about it? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Maybe your offer just didn't meet their requirements. Maybe they have tax reasons. Maybe they just want to be near all of the Gentoo project machines at OSU.

    Could be many reasons for it, and if Drupal owns the hardware and has it hosted at an educational institution, it probably works out better for them. :)

  75. Prove its point??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what makes the parent "flamebait"? Doesn't modding it such just prove its point?

  76. 3 grand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they need to do is contact one of the many posters here who any time computer prices get mentioned always explain how they built their own computer for around $250 and it specs out better than a top of the line commercial one.

  77. Re:.....wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    My guess, based on your comment, is that you're another victim of the rewrite bug that often afflicts junior programmers. Writing code is not necessarily more efficient than reading other people's, but it is generally more fun so kiddies always want to rewrite everything in sight. What they end up with isn't usually any better, though. Most code that's written as an excuse not to understand something that already existed sucks far worse than what it replaces.

    Well, it turns out, you're right. I went to his site and thought, "hmm, a blog system with comments and trackbacks, maybe he does have a point if he built this whole thing in 30 minutes." But then I tried his system. Anyone can add comments -- comment spam could (and probably eventually will) overrun his system. In addition, I was able to easily drop JavaScript code into the comments and it was executed! Of course, I only dropped in a harmless JavaScript alert, as I don't want to get in trouble for "hacking" a neophyte's crappy blog system.

    But in any case, to the grandparent post: my God, man, you cannot build such a shoddy, terrible system, and then tout the benefits of reinventing the wheel. Your wheel is awful, and better people before you have built wheels that put yours to shame. Yours is bad enough to actually be dangerous. It's a black-hat's wet dream. SQL injection, code insertion, you don't even launder your input! I fear for your site and the server that hosts it.

  78. Re:What was drupal? by TekPolitik · · Score: 1
    If you are the example of 'their targeted audience', then i hope they go under.

    A big difference between you an me is that at least I know that I am an A-grade arsehole.

    But the bigger difference would be the 150 points by which my IQ exceeds yours.

    Not every article on /. is directed at every reader. This one was directed at people who cared about Drupal. If that's not you, then newsflash, you don't have to bother going past the front page blurb. It's not anybody else's responsibility to dish out information to you on a silver platter. If you want more, seek it. If you don't, then go to the next article.

  79. ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because it took you 30 minutes to make that site in frontpage or whatever means that people who take more time suck.

    I'd like to see you come up with a GOOD database architecture (that alone will take more than 30 for anything decently sized/complex), stored procedures, MVC, custom components and assemblies, translating resources, making (and consuming) web services, writing all the code and contents. Heck, just coming up with a decent site structure, layout (on paper/in your head; then making it happen with CSS), making some basic graphics... That alone takes a lot of time. Now validate it all, test it, make it cross browser and everything... Or even doing some client & server side validation using regular expressions sure takes up more time than this. And we're not getting fancy yet either.

    Even if you'r reusuing a lot of code, using templates, good frameworks and all, realistically, you can't make something good in that much time.

    I don't use CMS'es either, but 30 minutes? Most (real) site development is measured in weeks or such.

  80. Re:Maybe this could help -- and it's completely fr by pangloss · · Score: 1

    Your sig is from Kant. See the end of The Critique of Practical Reason.

  81. Re:since i can't get to the link (what is drupal?) by obiwan2u · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in a quick video screen capture overview of Drupal, take a look at this Shockwave tutorial that I'm working on.

    --
    Ben in DC
    "It's the mark of an educated mind to be moved by statistics" Oscar Wilde
  82. Re:What was drupal? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No, you are wrong.

    It is the responsibility of everyone to give me what I want, how I want it, and when I want it.

    I am the only one that actually matters.

    Back to the subject at hand, I was actually considering helping these people, until i got grief from the likes of you weirdos. I might even have paid off the bill entirely for them.

    And to re-clarify, *I* am all that matters. And once the rest of you get that through your thick skulls your lives will be a lot happier.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  83. Plone rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mini applications. Woopdeedoo
    Try Plone and Zope. Try full blown applications
    Try XMLRPC.
    Just because CMS is the buzzword of the decade, doesn't mean everyone should use it to describe their glorified blogging software.

  84. Just say no to nukes! by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

    All of the Drupal websites were offline for about two days because of a server meltdown at the organization's hosting provider.

    Nucular computers is bad, mm'kay! Don't support it. This is what happens, things melt down and people are left without homes.

  85. WHAT? Leading What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drupal is the leading open-source (written in PHP) content management system and is used to power tens of thousands of websites, blogs, community sites, etc. tens of thousands of websites makes you to call Drupal the leading open-source content management system? So... if a CMS powers more than 6,000,000 of sites, How do you call it? Any term OVER "leading" is accepted. There isn't any CMS project with more powered sites than PHP-Nuke (like it or not), that is a real reason to call a software LEADER, not just some miserable tens of thousands... give me a break!!! Need I so give you some more proofs? Take this!

  86. Drupal vs. Mambo vs. Xoops vs. *Nuke? by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    Though I hadn't heard of Mambo before tonight I had done some sites using Drupal in the past. Nice but a pain to configure. Just curious how it is nowdays. I find Xoops (the engine behind perfectreign) to be very easy. Any recent experiences out there to compare?

    1. Re:Drupal vs. Mambo vs. Xoops vs. *Nuke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drupal has improved significantly with each release. The Drupal UI group are implementing a friendlier admin interface.

  87. Re:.....wtf by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1

    This guy sounds like a real expert on secure
    web programming.

    Maybe that's why there are Kevin Mitnick
    heads snowing down his comments page .

    --
    -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
  88. Re:Maybe this could help -- and it's completely fr by Synli · · Score: 1

    Care to elaborate?

    --
    "Two things inspire me to awe -- the starry heavens above and the moral universe within." - Albert Einstein
  89. After a good CMS? - live demos of many CMS's by baadger · · Score: 1

    For those after a good content management system for their site (and can't be bothered to make their own) check OpenSourceCMS.com for live demo's of about two dozen open source CMS systems scripts.

    Click "Portals (CMS)" in the crappy tree menu on the left and then each CMS has a demo link. Here is the Drupal demo (login: admin/demo).

    They also have blog script demos up - such as Wordpress

  90. "Meltdown" by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    Meltdown? What the fuck does that mean?
    It's not a nuclear reactor, it's probably just a burned CPU which can be replaced in 10 min and at a very low cost.

    Couldn't they tell the truth - "we're fed up with the old server and/or the hosting company"?

  91. Re:Maybe this could help -- and it's completely fr by ksb · · Score: 1

    Well, whilst sourceforge is a great resource, it is a CMS and using it to host a CMS one has developed may give the impression than one's own CMS isn't up to the job.

    At very least this may be their justification. Personally I'd have used sourceforge and hope users were with-it enough to understand why.

  92. Re:Maybe this could help -- and it's completely fr by Synli · · Score: 1

    > Well, whilst sourceforge is a great resource, > it is a CMS and using it to host a CMS one has > developed may give the impression than one's > own CMS isn't up to the job. SourceForge.net is not a CMS (content management system). It provides the following services for open-source projects: Free website hosting Free file download hosting (powerful mirror net) CVS and more. It is *exactly* what they need. And it will not cost them a cent.

    --
    "Two things inspire me to awe -- the starry heavens above and the moral universe within." - Albert Einstein
  93. Re:Maybe this could help -- and it's completely fr by ksb · · Score: 1

    I'm not making my point very well, I know exactly what SF is, but I imagine Drupal implements more than enough functionality to present itself, which is what I imagine they are after.

    But yes, SF would give them everything they need with none of the headaches.

  94. Re:Maybe this could help -- and it's completely fr by Synli · · Score: 1

    Yes, they could easily run Drupal on a website hosted on sourceforge. Either drupal.sf.net or drupal.org or whatever they want. Even if 100 MB would not be enough for them, they can negotiate better terms with SF if they can justify their such extra needs.

    --
    "Two things inspire me to awe -- the starry heavens above and the moral universe within." - Albert Einstein
  95. XHTML as text/html considered harmful by Daedalon · · Score: 1

    I checked a few Drupal-based sites and they all seemed to use text/html as their content-type so it seems to be the default in Drupal. AFAIK Sending XHTML as text/html is harmful, so could someone please clarify why is a project as big as Drupal using it?

  96. Check the ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact it is not even in the top 10 of modern CMS. Check this for the list: http://www.opensourcecms.com/index.php?option=cont ent&task=view&id=388&Itemid=143

  97. OSU Open Source Lab: Drupal's future home. by Anguo · · Score: 1

    OSU Open Source Lab: Drupal's future home, here:
    http://osuosl.org/

    The list of project they already host is impressive:
    http://osuosl.org/about/collaborators

    A:.

    --

    http://www.gnosis-usa.com/
    Revolutionary Psychology, White Tantrism, Dream Yoga...

    http://www.reuniting.info/
    Intimate Relationships, peace and harmony in the couple.

    --
    http://www.masquilier.org/republic/election/ Condorcet, Plurality voting and alternative voting enabled bulletin board.
  98. Drupal Info by Dakrin1 · · Score: 1

    Oh, and I was curious what drupal was too, the slashdot link doesn't give much more info than that it's a CMS, and drupal.org is down (looks like they haven't installed the new hardware in time for slashdot).

    Here's the wikipedia with link:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drupal

    Drupal is a content management framework, content management system and blogging engine which was originally written by Dries Buytaert and is the software used to power Debian Planet [1], Terminus1525 [2], Spread Firefox [3] and Kernel Trap [4], among others. Drupal is written in PHP using strict coding standards.

    Drupal is the English spelling for the Dutch word 'druppel' which means 'drop'.

    Though it started as a small bulletin board system, Drupal has become much more than just a news portal, thanks to its flexible architecture. Drupal has a basic layer, or core, which supports pluggable modules that enable additional behaviors. The modules available for Drupal provide a wide assortment of features, including e-commerce systems, workflow, photo galleries, mailing list management, and CVS integration. Drupal's taxonomy/classification module is especially interesting, in that it allows any content to be classified with a flexible tagging system.

    Some of the more special roles that Drupal has filled include company intranets, online classrooms, art communities and project management. Many feel that Drupal's focus on user communities is what makes it stand out from its competition.

  99. Want a prize? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to Slashdot, where calling people "asshats" and then bragging about your uber-RAM-workstation gets you modded "Informative." ...sigh...

  100. Hardware Donation Pictures at OSU Open Source Lab by daddywonka · · Score: 1

    As a followup, here at the pix of the Sun hardware. http://osuosl.org/photos/drupal/view

  101. Re:.....wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gah, TeamSite :'(

    Horrible horrible CMS - Especially as most people publishing content with it don't understand a thing about HTML.