Slashdot Mirror


Walter Koenig Reprises His Role as Chekov

hords writes "Walter Koenig returns to the role of Lt. Pavel Chekov in an upcoming episode of Star Trek: New Voyages, a fan made series mentioned earlier on Slashdot. He will be re-imagining the role that made him famous. 'The folks from New Voyages approached and we started kicking around ideas for a Chekov story,' said Koenig. 'It occurred to me that what we were coming up with was what every actor dreams of: a second chance to get it right...it is almost beyond comprehension that this is happening so late in my life! Talk about belated reward!...I didn't believe I could ever again be this excited about performing a part...I guess it isn't so trite after all: perhaps, all good things do come to those who wait.' Amazingly enough they even got D.C. Fontana to write the episode!"

199 comments

  1. Always thought he was underappreciated... by BTWR · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I always thought Walter Koenig was a fine actor. He was often underrated and often used simply for comic relief, which he is capable of much much more.

    Don't get me wrong, he has nice comedic timing, but I can guess that if he has something to do with the script, it'll be more than 30 minutes of "Nuclear Wessels!"

    1. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by Arker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. He did a great job on B5, in a much more serious role.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Really kind of daring considering the cold war and all. Simply being accused a sympathizer could mean lossing your job or even vigilante justice.

      I've always liked Koenig.

    3. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by Salvarus · · Score: 2, Funny

      But he was a damn good comic relief. BONES He's coming 'round, Jim... KIRK Pavel, can you hear me? Give me your name and rank... CHEKOV ... Chekov... Pavel H... Rank - (a fantasy smile) ... Admiral... GILLIAN Don't you guys have any enlisted types...?

    4. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      Really kind of daring considering the cold war and all. Simply being accused a sympathizer could mean lossing your job or even vigilante justice.
      That scene just can't be appreciated today the way it could back in the 1980s, when the cold war was still on.
      I was laughing so hard that tears were coming out of my eyes, and I wasn't the only one.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    5. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, absolutely he did. Bester is one of my favorite characters of all-time.

      Sure, he was a cold, calculating, (evil?) manipulator, but the episodes that involved his wife (captured and 'altered' by the shadows) really brought the depth into the character. It'd be interesting to talk to Mr. Koenig and find out what "made Bester tick" when he was acting the part.

      There were both greatscripts and great acting in B5...

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    6. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 5, Interesting
      He did an interview on Coast to Coast AM a few weeks ago, during which he gave his assessment of the old Star Trek cast. What I found most illustrative was his admonishment to "read between the lines" as he read through the roster, conspicuously omitting the name of William Shatner. When the host, George Noory, rather ham-handedly asked for Koenig's opinion of Shatner, Koenig gently reminded him again to "read between the lines."

      Sounds like there's some bad blood there.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    7. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Look at Walter Koenig. After Star Trek, he became an actor!" -- Futurama episode "Where No Fan Has Gone Before"

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      "Captain, I do not believe you have the authority to promote Riker to Admiral."

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    9. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by Bohnanza · · Score: 1
      There were both greatscripts and great acting in B5...

      As well as some wretched scripts and horrible acting.

      --

      -----

      Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

    10. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by Mike+McCune · · Score: 5, Informative
      >Sounds like there's some bad blood there.

      Read Warped Factors if you want a good account of why Koenig hated Shatner.

      William Shatner managed to make enemies of most of the cast of TOS. While he was friends with Nimoy and Kelly, the rest of the cast hated Shatner. James Doohan refused to speak to Shatner even to the last days of his life.

      BTW - Koenig really is Russian. His grandparents were Russian Jews from Vilna, Lithuania.

      --

      In a world that is Free and Open, who needs Windows and Gates?

    11. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Even now, having an Afghani officer on board the Promethius wouldn't really have the same effect.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Sounds like there's some bad blood there.

      Mr. Sulu didn't care much for Capt. Kirk either. (Search for "Shatner".)

    13. Re:Always thought he was underappreciated... by sydres · · Score: 1

      from the behind the scenes book i don't remember its name but basically shatner was rather childish and it took quite a while for him to stop resenting nimoy's attention and as far as kelly goes he was supposed to be one of the nicest men around so he probably overlooked shatner's ego

  2. Star Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, it's one of those cheap "Star Wreck" clones...

  3. They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by clifforch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That of Bester in Babylon 5, I mean, it was far more complex and he really showed he could play a bad(ish.. depends on your POV) guy in sci-fi.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA the hot grits profit you!
    1. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by smchris · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Yup. After his role as Bester, Koenig is one of my favorite SciFi oldsters. If only the books of Bester's life story could be filmed, _then_ he would play the role he was destined for.

    2. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by Harker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to agree with you there. As Bester, Coenig proved he is more than a two-dimensional actor.

      He makes a great villain.

      H.

      --
      When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
    3. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
      I never really saw Bester do anything particularly evil, he was just protecting his people. Would you say G'Kar was a bad guy? No, he was just protecting his people.

      Some of what he did may have been, distasteful or mean, but they were being done with the greater good in mind.

      He surely wasn't a nice guy, but rather than an outright villian like Morden, he just didn't care about anyone else's well being, just his people's.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    4. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by tillemetry · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I disagree. Bester messed up Garibaldi pretty good, and seemed to take a little too much joy in it. The sadistic streak made the character believable. If you followed B5, and looked at Bester, Chekov didn't even cross your mind. I thought it was great.

      Always thought the tip of the hat to Alfred Bester (whose book The Demolished Man laid out a lot of the "telepath lore") was a brillant move by the writers. Okay, they stole, but they gave the author credit at the same time. It was great.

    5. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

      You bet he messed up Garibaldi. Moved him clear off the tube and onto the radio. That's too bad, too, because I always wanted to see Garibaldi get some payback from Bester.

      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    6. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like the other poster says, bester enjoyed his work a bit too much.

      and he *absolutely* violated station regs, a direct order, in "tragedy of the telepaths". byron's group was granted safe passage and bester was ordered not to interfere. he did...

      on the other hand, morden, like sheridan's wife, anna, was under alien control. how can you call morden evil? he was on a ship traveling through space and got his brain hijacked.

      Koenig did a fantastic job playing the role. he went from being the goofy, fun loving, second tier character from star trek to a guy everyone loved to hate. he did that very, very well.

      congrats to walter and all star trek fans...sounds like they're gonna squeeze another quality story out of the star trek universe (it's about time!)

    7. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      I never really saw Bester do anything particularly evil, he was just protecting his people

      Mmmm. There was that one scene where they were Bester and some other telepath were transporting a couple of criminals back from B5 to Earth, I believe it was. After they hit hyperspace, Bester dumped them out the airlock instead of taking them back. When the other telepath asked him about it he told her not to worry about it as they were "just mundanes" i.e. not telepaths.
      That struck me as being quite the epitome of evil, killing someone just because they weren't the same as you. I think there's a word for that..

    8. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Would you say G'Kar was a bad guy?
      G'Kar would say so himself.
    9. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by EiZei · · Score: 1

      And he let go of the awful fake accent.. brr.

    10. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 4, Interesting

      His portrayal of Bester actually made me forget all about Chekov, to the point that when I see Walter Koenig I think "Bester" instead of "Chekov". Considering how deeply the 'Trek characters have been driven into our memories over the decades, that's quite a testimony to his acting ability.

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    11. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by Nimrangul · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yet is what he did something that can really be construed as evil?

      He did what he did to have is thumb on the pulse of Babylon 5, something vital to the continuation of his people. That he happens to get his kicks by pulling the wings off a fly kinda shows he has a dark side, but Garibaldi was the information man at the station and the telepaths needed that information.

      His view of mundane humans is understandable as well, it is the same view that many people have about the mentally retarded. Sure, they can go about living their lives, but you'd rather keep your people alive then them.

      If you are faced with the choice of letting a million mentally retarded people live or a hundred smart people live, where only one party could survive, which would be best for the race? It's a philosophical counter to Spock's needs of the many argument.

      Bester may have had an arrogance to him, but the end goal was a better world for his people. Dust was made to try and better humanity, it was designed to make people telepathic. The alliance with the Shadows was to make the race as a whole more powerful in the universe.

      Nah, I just can't view him as a villian, he isn't a protaganist, but he's definately not an antagonist either. Surely he was misguided, but that is in part because of what Psi-Corps had done to him.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    12. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bester had been in telepathic contact with quite a few people as they died and seen across the barrier between life and death. This was depicted in the series as a very risky thing to do, something that involved giving up a little of your own soul each time. Doing it without damned good reason was supposed to be 'evil' in a "I think I'll open that weird old book and pronounce a few Elder God's names just to see what happens" sense, like doing anything with enormous consequences just for a moment's kick and no thought of what else will follow. In a way, he knowingly embraced a fundamental evil, because he couldn't possibly have been too stupid to understand the consequences to his own soul and to the others he was watching die.
            That's what led to him becoming willing to kill or enslave mundanes even when there were other options that might have even worked better. He became more and more willing to break a few eggs before checking to see if he really needed to make yet another omelet.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    13. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by umeboshi · · Score: 1

      Yes, when I see a picture of him now, I
      instantly start hiding my bad thoughts and
      reciting "Mary Had a Little Lamb".

    14. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
      While I won't dive into the "soul" argument, I will say that being inside someone that died would probably have an effect on one mentally.

      Just being around death has an effect of removing one's joy of life and cheerfulness, the idea of feeling your life slip away, when it is not your own, is probably something that would change one's view on life.

      Being inside someone when they died would answer the question of what happens when we die, Bester would have first hand experiences with it.

      Perhaps that is more what it is like, looking through the eyes of a dying man and seeing nothing, feeling cold and knowing that there is no tunnel of light or glourious release, it's just a shutter and into the dirt you go.

      It may be that that would have an effect on how someone acts, that from then on they would live more on the edge, knowing nothing better is coming along.

      Maybe Bester didn't do it the first time for kicks, maybe it was suggested to him, as a character building experience, maybe from then on he had returned to it, to reassure himself and make sure he completely understood the emptiness of death. Who knows such things?

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    15. Re:They missed out one role I really enjoyed.. by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Maybe Bester didn't do it the first time for kicks, maybe it was suggested to him, as a character building experience, maybe from then on he had returned to it, to reassure himself and make sure he completely understood the emptiness of death. Who knows such things?

      The writers? It's a fricking TV show...

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  4. what about the money? by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

    Anybody know how much he's getting paid?

    1. Re:what about the money? by sm3ggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      nothing, he's getting nothing

    2. Re:what about the money? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Happiness.

      KFG

  5. Chekov, any relation? by ReformedExCon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the Star Trek world, was Chekov related in any way to playwright Anton Chekov? I know they liked to toss around all sorts of literary allusions (including the famous "Shakespeare must be read in its original Klingon" line.

    More power to these guys! Star Trek continues, despite its critics, to (as Vulcans like to say) "live long and prosper".

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:Chekov, any relation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is an intentional allusion to Anton Chekov.

    2. Re:Chekov, any relation? by Bradmont · · Score: 1

      I think there's probably something there... Anton Chekhov's father was named Pavel.

  6. Three things are certain in life: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    death, taxes, and the attempted resurrection of Star Trek.

    Please, just let it go. For the sake of humanity.

    1. Re:Three things are certain in life: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the sake of humanity.

      and beyond!

  7. Re:not dead yet? by double-oh+three · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whaa? You crazy. Kirk may have died (twice, IIRC) but William Shatner is doing pretty well with Boston Legal.

    --
    "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  8. Trek that doesn't suck? by ericdano · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Is this to be the fabled Trek series that doesn't suck? I hope so. Next Generation sucked. Deep Space Nine sucked. Voyager was ok. The movies.....sucked.

    Maybe if they got Ben Browder on board. Like the new season of Star Gate.....Or maybe Edward James Olmos....

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      I think you have it backwards. NG was decent, DS:9 failed in the end, and Voyager just sucked all the way through.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    2. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by ericdano · · Score: 1
      No. You have it backwards. NG sucked. To command a ship by majority rule. How BORING. Too PC. And W. Crusher's character was LAME.

      DS9. *Yawn*. Slighty less lame....slighty.

      Voyager. Interesting. At least we have a captain with some balls and hair.

      Oh, and there was this series called Enterprise....that um.....sucked as well.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    3. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Voyager was my favorite by far. TNG was cool, until I saw Voyager. I never liked any of the other ones.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    4. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by ericdano · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Voyager by far had the best actors, and the best stories of the Star Trek series save the Original series.

      *Begin Rant*

      Come on, the dialogue in TNG is corny. The decision making....psh, command by committee?

      At least in Voyager they dumped the "counselor" position.....which has to be the LAMEST position ever....well, next to W. Crusher's position.

      *End Rant*

      Seriously, I hope this project for Walter Koenig works out. It would be nice to have some Trek that doesn't suck...

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    5. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this to be the fabled Trek series that doesn't suck? I hope so. Next Generation sucked. Deep Space Nine sucked. Voyager was ok. The movies.....sucked.

      What kind of post is this? You have left out The Animated Series!

    6. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [i]Voyager by far had the best actors, and the best stories of the Star Trek series save the Original series.[/i] Drugs.

    7. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I totally agree with you on TNG, but I've always enjoyed DS9. Sure, it was more soap-opera-ish than the others, but that's what I liked about it - it actually had continuity, characters, and conflict.

      "Command by committee". Truer words were never spoken. I've got to remember that one. :)

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    8. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sisko remains my favorite captain - the man was just tough...

    9. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next Gen was a great show! If not the best Star Trek! It and Voyager both were the only star trek I really found good enough to watch! The ground that both of those series broke was just increadable.... anyone that thinks NG is the worst, must be the most blind person I've ever seen! >_>

    10. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by bani · · Score: 1

      I liked DS9 more than TNG. The first few seasons of TNG are really bad, especially the pilot episode.

      The last two seasons or so of DS9 are good space opera. Too bad you had to slog through 4 years of drivel to get there.

    11. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by stwrtpj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The decision making....psh, command by committee?

      I'd be interested to hear you expand on this. Are you referring to the scenes where Picard gathered up his command personnel in the Ready Room? To me, that sounds like a good strategy: gather together people who are experts in their fields, obtain information from them, solicit their opinions, and then make an informed decision. Not to mention it gave the writers a chance to give backplot where needed.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    12. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

      Why not have a counselor? Starfleet seems pretty stressful. The last thing you want is for someone to crack, grab a phaser rifle and waste the entire preschool class.

      Like in my Geordi fanfic!

      --

      The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
    13. Re:Trek that doesn't suck? by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Compare Voyager to TNG. In Voyager, there are hardly any long debates and getting people's "feelings". Opinions are given, and then they go. TNG they debate, get feelings readings, take the temperature, look at the astrology charts, then make a decision.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
  9. Re:Make you look like a fool boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, i am old!

  10. Rick Berman is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy talks about franchise fatigue when in fact people are tired of the direction he took the show in.

    No can be creatively energized forever and that's why you don't see the same people running the same franchises for 20 years.

    DUDE, LET IT GO. STOP BEING THE !@#$%%^&* LORNE MICHAELS OF SCI-FI.

  11. Star Trek is where it belongs by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ron Moore of Battlestar Galactica said on his blog that with Star Trek: Enterprise cancelled and no plans on any future series or movies, that Star Trek had returned once more to its fans. I can understand now what he meant. Back when TOS was cancelled, fan run magazines popped up with fan fiction. Now, in the 21st century, the same thing is happening, only it's changed along with the technology we now have access to. And I can't think of any better hands for Star Trek to be in at the moment, then its fans.

    1. Re:Star Trek is where it belongs by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      And I can't think of any better hands for Star Trek to be in at the moment, then its fans.

      Let the endless tide of "Slash" fiction... begin!

      Uh, that is, continue!

  12. Re:Make you look like a fool boy by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

    if we're going to quote the boss on this one:

    we went down to the river
    but i know the river is dry...


    except for river, read "well".

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  13. Walter Koenig Rocks! by robocrop · · Score: 2, Funny
    Anyone else catch Walter in that goofy moon movie he made? I remember he was making out in a moon tent with a moon babe and some moon robot tried to kill him! On the moon! What was that movie called? Something ... 'trap'.

    Seriously it scared the hell out of me as a kid. Now when I watch it I'm just embarassed. Ah well.

    1. Re:Walter Koenig Rocks! by aka.Daniel'Z · · Score: 1

      I saw the movie, years ago. Can't remember the name, but I'm pretty sure it was Mars, not the moon.

    2. Re:Walter Koenig Rocks! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      According to IMDB, it's Moontrap.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Walter Koenig Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else catch Walter in that goofy moon movie he made? I remember he was making out in a moon tent with a moon babe and some moon robot tried to kill him! On the moon! What was that movie called? Something ... 'trap'.

      Err. You're being silly, right? It's "Moontrap":

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097911/

      The foes are football-sized egg-like alien constructor robots that look benign, but when you're not looking they sprout tentacles and construct big robotic / cybernetic bodies from scrap metal or corpses for the purpose of killing and maiming.

      I seem to remember it as above-average low-budget sci-fi movie. In some way it's refreshing because (besides the aliens), it's fairly realistic in terms of physics and spaceflight.

    4. Re:Walter Koenig Rocks! by FuriousBalancing · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it was called "The Moon That Couldn't Slow Down"

    5. Re:Walter Koenig Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i actually met him when he was touring to promote that movie.
      the movie was hilariously bad; stepped out of the room halfway through it, it was that bad. the thing that got me is that i ran into him not once at the showing but twice. the first time he was just being chummy with me and chatting with anyone, the second time, i caught him trying to bum enough money from the show's organizers to get cabfare so he could go to the airport.

      don't have a clue as to how much money he is making on this fanflick. stands to reason that if he had to borrow money to get from a showing of that moon movie then this fanflick can't be paying all that much.

      Magic Eight Ball says:

      chances are good Chekov is still bumming money for cabfares.

    6. Re:Walter Koenig Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look it up at IMDB.

      My guess would be "Moontrap".

    7. Re:Walter Koenig Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not much gets by you, eh?

  14. Interesting sidenote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here was a good read I found not oo long ago about the choice to add W.K. to the series.
    http://www.snopes.com/radiotv/tv/chekov.asp

  15. wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    there is so much going on in your post with your name and your sig and... wow. just wow.

    1. Re:wow... by FosterKanig · · Score: 0, Funny

      Wanna bet he's a pedophile? Prison, sci-fi, Jesus; it just screams pederast.

  16. Not trying to be a spoilsport but... by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a Trek fan all I can say is "power to those guys", I'm looking forward to check out their stuff once their server recovers, but...

    what are the legal ramifications of this? Isn't there some Big Corporation who owns the rights to the Star Trek names? If New Voyages makes it big I fear they'll be sued out of existance... :(

    1. Re:Not trying to be a spoilsport but... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Chekov isn't being paid, and no-one is paying the guys making the "series" so it should be as safe as possible (with fan-fiction friendly Paramount). Could they, in the future, be sued? Possibly, but Paramount is obviously aware of them, and hasn't told them to stop (and may have given them the okay).

    2. Re:Not trying to be a spoilsport but... by hords · · Score: 1

      If you read into their page some you will also see that they have the support of Roddenberry Jr. They can't be much more legit, besides being on tv at this point.

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Re:not dead yet? by JRock911 · · Score: 1

    Denny Crane - CooCoo For Cocoa Puffs

  19. Re:not dead yet? by ilyaaohell · · Score: 5, Informative

    William Shatner has been getting consistent work for many years now. He's had supporting roles in several very successful films, from Dodgeball to Miss Congeniality. He has won last year's Emmy for Outstanding Guest Actor and is currently nominated for another Emmy for Outstanding Supporting Actor for his role in Boston Legal, a television show with bigger viewership than the original Star Trek ever got.

    Any questions?

    --
    UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
  20. The web server by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's dead, Jim.

    1. Re:The web server by alexandreracine · · Score: 0

      No it's not. It's just went to light speed. (away that is)

      --
      No sig for now.
    2. Re:The web server by Mercano · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dammit, I'm a doctor, not an IT adminstrator!

      --
      #include <signature.h>
  21. Troll that doesn't suck? by lheal · · Score: 1

    You didn't like TNG or DSN, but did like Voyager?

    Face it: you're not a nerd. You just like looking at Jeri.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Troll that doesn't suck? by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Shhhhhhhh! Was Not! Well.......erm.......No, I was not! Seriously ;-)

      No, I think a lot of the story lines were better in Voyager. The Borg was more interesting as well.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Troll that doesn't suck? by erc · · Score: 1

      I never could decide who I wanted to enter a kissing contest with more - Jeri or Roxanne. :)

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    3. Re:Troll that doesn't suck? by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Voyager was the series where the Borg got uber nerfed. They went from one cube destroying an armada of Federation ships to an armada of cubes unable to take down one Federation ship.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
  22. Trek Dreck by maelstrom · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I can barely stand to hear the words Star Trek, I can't imagine how he can.

    --
    The more you know, the less you understand.
    1. Re:Trek Dreck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sat down and watched it. I was expecting *HORRID* fan crap. While there is a bit of it in there. These are in some ways better than the ones that were on syndicated TV the past few years.

      They have it. They got what its about. It is almost spot on. They have that elusive something thats missing from the other shows. I am not sure what that something is but it is there. I for one could not stand the past few incarnations of ST. I gave up on ds9 voyager and enterprise. I am looking forward to what more these guys can do! They clean up the acting a bit and they will be good. Instead of the wink wink nudge nudge they are currenty giving the camera, and reusing tired ST cliches, and they will be golden.

      Pull the camera out a bit and I think they will have the 'look' spot on. As it is a bit too close to the actors currently. However I was completly entertained by ST. It has been a VERY long time since that has happened for me.

  23. but will he be able to say his famous line? by RouterSlayer · · Score: 1

    PLEASE have him say "nuclear vessels" !
    ROFLMAO!

    Seriously, that was the best line in futurama episode!

    btw why did they have "welshy" ? was it just a gag, or what?

    1. Re:but will he be able to say his famous line? by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Scotty refused to be on the show... (or so I read, I believe on IMDB)

      sad!

    2. Re:but will he be able to say his famous line? by bobintetley · · Score: 1

      btw why did they have "welshy" ? was it just a gag, or what?

      The United Kingdom is made up of four territories, Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales. People from Wales are Welsh, people from Scotland are Scots... get it?

    3. Re:but will he be able to say his famous line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, they really *are* called "nuclear wessels".

    4. Re:but will he be able to say his famous line? by TapTapTheChisler · · Score: 1

      He couldn't do it because of his health (Alzheimer's)

    5. Re:but will he be able to say his famous line? by stigpalm · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're the cunts, you're obviously the wanker.

    6. Re:but will he be able to say his famous line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      + people from Cornwall are Cornish.

    7. Re:but will he be able to say his famous line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's shite being Scottish! We're the lowest of the low. The scum of the fucking Earth! The most wretched miserable servile pathetic trash that was ever shat on civilization. Some people hate the English - I don't. They're just wankers. We, on the other hand, are colonized by wankers. Can't even find a decent culture to get colonized by! We're ruled by effete assholes. It's a shite state of affairs to be in, Tommy, and all the fresh air in the world won't make any fucking difference!"

      - Renton, "Trainspotting"

    8. Re:but will he be able to say his famous line? by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "yadernyje korabli".;)

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  24. Scotty wouldn't do the episode..they wrote him out by FatSean · · Score: 1

    That's what they said in the comentary. Since we've learned what the actor was suffering with before his death, I wonder if in a better state of mind he would have done it.

    --
    Blar.
  25. Babylon 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He plays the role of an evil Psi-Corp officer, Bester. I think he's pretty damn good in that one. Check out Babylon 5, it's quite excellent... I mean the entire plotline which unveils.

    1. Re:Babylon 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bester was NOT evil any more than the British (or Americans) were evil in the US Revolutionary war.
      He was just motivated by a different faction than what we grew to love.

  26. Price of Star Trek DVDs by cjsm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Somewhat off topic, but I was starshocked when I went to Circut City recently, and they had the original series on DVD for $129. I though, well, that's for the complete show, but it was one season. WTF. TNG is priced the same per season. I wouldn't mind owning these, but I'm not going to pay the rate of a newly released movie in widescreen enhanced def, for a forty year old TV series in low def TV format (I have an Infocus ScreenPlay projector and 6 ft wide screen).

    Well, the market is supposed to set the price, but the price on these old TV shows on DVD are way overpriced, IMO, and I'm not buying. These old TV shows are worth about the same or less to me as a discounted old movie at Walmart, nowhere near $390 for 3 seasons of Star Trek. Maybe 1/4th that amount.

    --
    This ad space for rent.
    1. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Informative
      Paramount are basically nothing more than "rip-off" merchants when it comes to pricing the Trek series on DVD.

      Over here in the UK, most TV series, including The Simpsons, 24, Babylon 5, The X-Files, etc. seem to be priced around £30 (=~$55) which, to me, is about right. However, the Star Trek series seem to be priced around £69.95 (=~$125) which is ridiculous.

      I'm gradually collecting Trek on DVD, having sold my videos on Ebay while I could still get a reasonable price for them, and I just wait until the post-Christmas sales in stores or on-line retailers to buy the DVDs. So far, I have the complete TNG DVD set and I don't think I paid more than £40 for any one series.

      I've emailed Paramount with some intelligent questions and comments about their pricing policy on Trek DVDs on a number of occasions (hoping that a lot of other people do the same) but never even get a confirmation of receipt of the email, let alone a response.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by slashdotnickname · · Score: 1

      You can always download the DVD. After 30+ years, and the death of its creator, it should be public domain anyways.

    3. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      I did give in and buy them when I had some amazon credit. They have this ridiculous-yet-neat plastic shell on the outside and then on the inside it's two layers of paper products around a stack of loose single-dvd trays held together with a piece of tape, making a "book" with a scotch-tape spine. Lameness.

      But still it's better than the original format and price: 2 (two) episodes per dvd at $14.99 each dvd. That's right folks, the initial dvd release of the series would cost about $600. So I guess paramount did us a favor!

      The bottom line is that they know the demand is not going to fluctuate much on price for this kind of thing so they tend to gouge...

    4. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      You're right: it's insane. I'll never buy the DVD's at those prices, let alone the newer episodes from Enterprise for example (which, AFAIK, were all done in HD, so when you buy the DVD's you're actually sacrificing quality and paying through the nose: hold out for the HD-DVD or BluRay releases).

      FWIW though: I'll happily pirate them on BitTorrent, and if I ever meet an exec from Paramount I'll flip them off and tell them I did.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    5. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by EiZei · · Score: 1

      Un-fucking-believable, I had to check myself and indeed, TOS season packages are actually more expensive (67 euros) than, for example, 24 Season 4 box set (56 euros)!

    6. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by renata.org · · Score: 1

      I suggest you buy the DVDs in Brazil. :) Here the TOS box costs R$190 (very overpriced for Brazilians, but it's about 80 USD). As I don't have 190 to pay for a box, I'm waiting for some TOS fan friend to buy and then I'll copy everything. Thanks there is no RIAA in Brazil :)

    7. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      Here, let me help you:

      *discount*

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    8. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Didn't you get the memo? that only applies to content that no-one gives a shit about, like old versions of pong?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    9. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by henni16 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then you better not check (German) prices for Star Trek - or even more extreme: "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" or "Angel":
      at amazon.de: 59 euros per HALF season of Buffy/Angel, making ~120euros (~147$) for a whole season;
      granted, the older seasons are cheaper _now_ but you could order a whole season for less than that from the UK or US.

      They sell Star Trek TOS and Voyager seasons for 99 euros, TNG for 79 euros.

      In theory, you can order a RC1-season of Buffy (45$) and a RC1-DVD-player including shipping, taxes and customs for less than the price of a RC-2 season...

    10. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      24 does not even come close to star trek. Don't try to compare them.

      As for the price, it is very high but almost worth it. The sound quality on these is better than the earlier dvd release. I was able to pay for one season with the money from selling the few TOS dvds on ebay that i had bought before. I also sold vhs copies of episodes my grandfather picked up at a garage sale (CBS/Columbia house set).

      The other two seasons i got as a gift. If you only can afford one season, i'd tell ya to get season 1. Season 2 is ok but season 3 is weak.

      Remember though this is TOS and not some hack show from 20+ years in the future. Its worth some money.

    11. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      I don't really care how good the quality is, $135 - $150 (canadian) for the seasons is just too insanely expensive.

      I buy a shit load of DVDs. I have seasons 1 - 6 of the Simpsons. 1 - 2 of That 70's Show. The 1st season of The Flintstones and Married With Children. All of those costed $35 - $50 CAD each... and that's about right for me.

      If TNG seasons were around $50 I would own all 7 seasons by now. But so far I haven't bought a single season.

      I'm sure Paramount isn't losing much money because there's going to be a ton of die hard fans who are willing to shell out that money... and that pisses me off because TNG was probably my all time favourite tv show ever... but until the prices come down closer to reality I will never, ever buy a single season.

    12. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      If you don't like something enough to pay the price for it, that's fine, but that doesn't make them overpriced. People have no problem paying $20 for a 90 minute movie DVD. Now consider that a season of TNG has 26 episodes (except season 2). 26 episodes at 40 minutes each makes 1040 minutes of content. When you calculate the price per minute, 90 minutes of trek costs $11.25, which is pretty much your "discounted" movie price. I don't know why you sound so surprised that something which has more content would cost more.

    13. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Quality does matter. Most of the 35 dollar sets of tv shows i've bought had imperfections on the disks. For example, Knight rider season 1 has an unplayable episode and the knight rider 2000 movie does not play all the way through. In fact it dies right after "scotty" at the ATM. I've never had a problem with a star trek dvd playing. Season 2 of knight rider has a skip in an episode, macgyver has an unplayable episode in season 1. Its not my dvd player either.. i have 2 dvd players and 3 computers that can play dvds. All do it. Likewise i have 1 simpsons disk thats bad and its got my third favorite episode when mr. burns runs for president and the fish is served to him (blinky?).

    14. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      If any part of the disk won't play then you should take it back.

      That's not so much a quality issue to me as a defection. When someone says "quality" I assume they mean picture and sound quality etc. That's clearly my problem and interpretation.. but I don't care if I only paid $2 for something.. if it won't play I take it back and exchange it or get a refund. And AFAIK no store is allowed to refuse a refund if the product is defective. Even if they have a no refund policy (they can only refuse refunds on working products).

    15. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by EiZei · · Score: 1

      24 does not even come close to star trek. Don't try to compare them.

      Yeah, because we all know that dvd boxset prices are based on quality and not on what stupid fanboys are ready to pay for the same shit that has been broadcast over and over again.

      Remember though this is TOS and not some hack show from 20+ years in the future. Its worth some money.

      140 euros for some campy 40-year-old sci-fi show? Ill pass thank you very much.

    16. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a different question. The first few episodes do not have a copyright date or mark on them. As per the law at the time you needed to display that. Does this make them public domain like that John Ramero movie?

    17. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      That might be difficult, for a couple of reasons: First, are they region 1 DVDs? Second, are they in English (instead of Portugese)? Third, how difficult/costly is it to import them? Fourth, do you know of a good online store to order from?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      It depends who has the most money to defend their claim in court...

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    19. Re:Price of Star Trek DVDs by renata.org · · Score: 1

      First, they may be any region, almost all DVD players today are easy to unlock. Second, any DVDs in Brazil have original audio and almost all are closed-captioned - we like to watch DVDs in closed-captioned subtitles, brazilians usually hate non-original audio. Third, the cost of import I really can't say - that may be a problem, as it is very expensive for me as a brazilian to buy anything from any other country so I believe it may be expensive for anyone to buy things from Brazil. Fourth, I like to buy things at Americanas.com.br and Submarino.com.br, but I don't know if they ship abroad (I'm almost sure Americanas does it, via FedEx). The only problem is all the sites are in Portuguese. I think it may be easier to ask someone who is going to Brazil to buy things here to you.

  27. I actually read Buck Alice And The Actor Robot by milkme123 · · Score: 1

    I saw it at a used bookstore with Walter's face on it and thought "huh, guess I'll read it".

    It was really, really bad.

  28. Also great ST fan film... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who haven't seen this...

    the adventures of the starship exeter. The "Tressaurian Intersection" looks good. Ep 1 was good, but this one looks even better, judging from the teaser...

  29. Re:not dead yet? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 3, Funny
    [Blah blah Shatner is a superstar and I want to have his baby blah blah blah ...]

    Any questions?
    Yes, I have some questions:
    1. What is your name?
    2. What is your quest?
    3. What is your favorite color?
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  30. Re:not dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't forget his musical career :)

  31. Re: Legal Ramifications of ST:TNV by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 5, Informative
    what are the legal ramifications of this?
    According to IMDB, none, as long as they don't make a profit.

    Relevant section:
    Trivia: Although this is a "non-official" Star Trek incarnation, Paramount Pictures which owns the name and the rights to Star Trek agreed to allow the producers of New Voyages to make these episodes on the condition that no profit was to be garnered from the show.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  32. cold war? by fux0r · · Score: 1

    I've often wondered whether the role of Chekov contributed to the end of the cold war. The convergence of humankind is somewhat analogous to the Federation and Klingons in TNG, although not to the extent that humans are united in the original series.

    I've also wondered if the addition of a Russian officer in the original series, in the 60's, was mere coincidence? If so, that's one hell of a coincidence!

    1. Re:cold war? by DoktorTomoe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The convergence of humankind is somewhat analogous to the Federation and Klingons in TNG, although not to the extent that humans are united in the original series.

      You think of TOS, don't you?

      In Star Trek 4, there is that great scene where Checkov gets caught in 20th century era aircraft carrier (to steal nuclear material. The ship is called 'Enterprise', of course). Being interrogated by two naval intelligence cold warriors, calling himself an UFP citizen, with a straight face, implying that national citizenship does not exist in the TOS universe. I really liked this scene, even if this is somewhat a story gap to TNG, where people of earth still have a kind of "national identity" (see Picard).

    2. Re:cold war? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered whether the role of Chekov contributed to the end of the cold war. The convergence of humankind is somewhat analogous to the Federation and Klingons in TNG, although not to the extent that humans are united in the original series.

      I've also wondered if the addition of a Russian officer in the original series, in the 60's, was mere coincidence? If so, that's one hell of a coincidence!


      IFAICR, Checkov was added after the Russians complained theat they were in space but ST didn't acknowldge them - hence teh constan "invented by a little old lady from Leningrad..."

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:cold war? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered whether the role of Chekov contributed to the end of the cold war

      Could be... I mean... before Chekov we had the threat of Nuclear subs... post Chekov we had the threat of Nuclear Wessles... Nu-Clear Wess-les.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:cold war? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know that it's that much of a gap really. See, I would say I'm a citizen of the United States if being interrogated somewhere else in the world, but if I was talking to friends (like many of the Picard nationality scened) I'd likely talk about my Finger Lakes New York heritage...

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    5. Re:cold war? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      The convergence of humankind is somewhat analogous to the Federation and Klingons in TNG
      That's because Trek is often inspired by current events. For example, Praxis == Chernobyl.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  33. Re:not dead yet? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Didn't he do a "reality show" recently?

    The best thing about so-called reality TV programming is the reveal (which is never revealed to the viewer). The reveal is that the viewer is the sucker, not the supposed, on-screen sucker. Think about it.

  34. Wil Wheaton, please read this post..... by tloh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dear Wil,

    Since discovering you as a blogger and an author, I've begun to know you as more than just Wesley Crusher. First up, despite the cheese dick writers at TNG who had no clue how to develope your character, I've always apploaded the role you portrayed. In the real world where mediocrity often rule over those who dared to dream or excel, Wesley Crusher was one of the few shining examples where the geek spirit was truly celebrated. For me, personally, you made it okay to be smart. After reading "Just a Geek", I think that aspect of Wesley Crusher is something you can truly identify with. The compeling story in your book about your own internal relationship with a controvertial fictional persona you helped create as an actor fleshed both of you out in a way Trek and Hollywood never could.

    In the context of this /. post, I wonder if you have ever considered wrestling control of the character Wesley Crusher from those who have helped make your early life difficult. Have you ever considered using your own judgement to tell a story about this young man from an idealized future in a way that *you* see fit? The guy you like to call "William Fucking Shatner" has penned a number of books about Kirk. I think John De Lance has also written a novel about Q. You are an accomplished writter now, with two successful books to your credit and a number of magazine columns. What's to stop you from picking up a pen (or keyboard/laptop) and re-imagining Wesley Crusher in a way that isn't limited by political correctness, TV ratings, or studio beurocracy? In "Just a Geek", you seemed to have made peace with the tomultuous legacy Wesley have left you. But you still seemed some what regretful of the fact your left-on-the-cutting-room-floor cameo would be the last time you would bring Wesley to life. If you can pull it off, I think I wouldn't be the only one to find a Wesley Crusher novel told by the man who gave him life to be very worth reading. Please think about it.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:Wil Wheaton, please read this post..... by zakezuke · · Score: 0

      Wesley have left you. But you still seemed some what regretful of the fact your left-on-the-cutting-room-floor cameo would be the last time you would bring Wesley to life. If you can pull it off, I think I wouldn't be the only one to find a Wesley Crusher novel told by the man who gave him life to be very worth reading. Please think about it.

      *Flashback*

      Mr. Crusher: What is this
      Traveler: This is a bluescreen Wesley
      Mr. Crusher: I don't understand
      Traveler: You see the universe is one big jog and shuttle VCR, and once we learn how to use the *remote control* we can freeze reality.
      Mr. Crusher: Can I overlap a bullet train and make it run over the producers who gave me grief when I wanted to move on to bigger and better things?
      Travelers: Or better still you can remove the William Fucking Shatner's toupee and make it travel around the universe.

      *theme music*

      Space... the void between the stars
      This is the story of William Shatner's toupee
      Our purpose... to meet three breasted alien women
      To get down and funky... like white on rice
      to make it so hard to get rid of me they give up and give me a blow

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:Wil Wheaton, please read this post..... by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see a book entitled "Shut up Wesley!"

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    3. Re:Wil Wheaton, please read this post..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geez, what a geek

  35. Re:not dead yet? by isorox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whaa? You crazy. Kirk may have died (twice, IIRC) but William Shatner is doing pretty well with Boston Legal.

    And All Bran adverts in the UK..

  36. Obligatory Futurama Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fry: Melllvar, you can't let a TV show be your whole life. You can do anything you want. Look at Walter Koenig. After Star Trek, he became an actor!

    Koenig: Not just an actor but a well rounded person! With my own friends, credit cards, keys...

    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walter Koenig: Keptin, I wope he vill help our... vessel.
      Melllvar: Wessel!
      Walter Koenig: Uuuugghhh.
      Melllvar: You're not acting hard enough!

  37. Goooooooood Moooooorning Slashdot by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Not meaning to troll or anything, but I started browsing through Wikipedia to find out more about New Voyages. And guess what, even the original entry from June 2nd already included these "news"...

    --
    Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
  38. Re:not dead yet? by nightznoe · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but about his role as T.J. Hooker? Or his dramatic work as Host of Rescue 911?

  39. Ditto .. by Macka · · Score: 1


    Voyager was my favourite too.

    Enterprise started off a quite weak, but eventually found its rhythm and captured my imagination as the Xindi story line got into full swing. The way they closed it down at the end though was a crying shame. It wasn't a conclusion, it was a hatchet job, and an insult to the Star Trek legacy.

  40. Re:not dead yet? by VJ42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's not meant to be funny; William Shatner really is doing All Bran adverts here in the UK.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  41. Re:Johnny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand.

  42. Re:not dead yet? by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 4, Funny
    I've a friend who's a TOS purist, and she absolutely hates to see William Shatner anywhere other than TOS because his "goofiness" ruins her image of Kirk. Geez, I wish she'd lighten up.

    I like goofy Shatner! He knows he's a big goofball and he has fun with it. The guy always makes me laugh.

    (Stolen from his Wikipedia page:)
    "I'm not a Starfleet commander, or T.J. Hooker. I don't live on Starship NCC-170... (some audience members say "1"), or own a phaser. I don't know anybody named Bones, Sulu, or Spock (picture of Dr. Benjamin Spock is shown on screen behind him). And no, I've never had green alien sex, but I'm sure it'd be quite an evening. (Pomp and Circumstance begins playing.) I speak English and French, not Klingon! I drink Labatt's, not Romulan ale! And when someone says to me 'live long and prosper', I seriously mean it when I say, 'get a life'. My doctor's name is not McCoy, it's Ginsberg (nude picture of Dr. Ginsberg shown on screen). And tribbles were puppets, not real animals. PUPPETS! And when I speak, I never, ever talk like Every. Word. Is. Its. Own. Sentence. I live in California, but I was raised in Montreal. And I believe in priceline.com, where you never have to pay full price for airline tickets, hotels, and car rentals! I've appeared onstage at Stratford, at Carnegie Hall, Albert Hall, and the Monkland Theatre in NDG. And, yes, I've gone where no man has gone before, but... I was in Mexico and her father gave me permission! My name is William Shatner, and I am Canadian!"

    --from a Just for Laughs appearance; a parody of the popular Molson Canadian Commercial entitled "I Am Canadian".

    --
    We apologize for the inconvenience.
  43. There was never just simple evil on B5 by infonography · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Nobody did anything because they were evil. Well may just Emperor Cartagia, but he was nuts in a Caligula sort of way. Morden was a spiritual disciple of the Shadows. Who to human eyes where the ultimate Bug Eyed Monsters, were not really such bad guys. Their Nietzsche-esque strength thru war had the same misinterpretation the Nazi had.

    from Wikipedia :"has the joke goes, Nietzsche detested Nationalism, Socialism, Germans and mass movements, so naturally he was adopted as the intellectual mascot of the National Socialist German Workers' Party." He was also far from being a racist, believing that the "vigour" of any population could only be increased by mixing with others."

    Morden gets a bit more development in that Technomage series.

    Everybody had reasons and history for why they did stuff. The Bester character kept Garibaldi under his thumb because he was in such a perfect position to hear stuff. What malice there was was incidental, just bad blood between them.

    Overall Walter Koenig, is the only real actor to come out of the series. Later work by almost the whole cast had a 'Phone it in' feel. See Nimoy's role in Brave New World, (it stank on ice)

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  44. ...where no StarTrek has gone before... by moviepig.com · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...we started kicking around ideas for a Chekov story...

    Damn straight. Let's put the angst back into space-travel. Next stop, Dostoyevsky...

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    1. Re:...where no StarTrek has gone before... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Next stop, Dostoyevsky...

      ...crew takes a three hour detour to debate the nature of a God who allows bad things to happen to good people...Riker advocates fideism, Worf takes the atheist position, Data asks the questions.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  45. That Q dude by Mikey+Rowan · · Score: 0

    First I heard about this and, to be perfectly honest, thank fuck. Now they can include the Q Continuum into the old school trek... well, they'd better coz Q'S DA MAN.

    1. Re:That Q dude by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      What does John DeLancie have to do with this at all?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  46. Re:Would you say G'Kar was a bad guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did you miss everything after about the 2nd season? That was the most developing character in the series. Evil cutthroat politician to Reluctant Messiah, Wiseman, and Saint in three seasons. I always thought the Narn where based on Muslims. Scary on the surface but truly a noble people.

    Funny how this has turned into a Babylon 5 conversation, I can't associate Walter Koenig with Star Trek anymore.

  47. ...in other words... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 3, Funny

    500% of the profits!

  48. Um - well ... by DikSeaCup · · Score: 3, Informative
    Actually, she was the one that dumped them.

    If I remember correctly, he said:

    "We still have the mundane to deal with."

    She responded:

    "Can I do it?"

    And we see the body floating out in hyperspace.

  49. Re: Legal Ramifications of ST:TNV by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they can just 'cook the books' as Paramount and the other studios are famous for so that they can get rich while 'technically' the movie won't make any money because while the gross profits were huge, they swell the expenses to compensate so there is no net profit.

  50. Star Trek Open Source. . ???? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    As it should be.

    Long Live, and Prosper. --And I mean that with all my heart!

    But please. . .

    Get good writers, directors and lighting crew. Please.

    Fan-made works often have little quality control because fans are usually operating from a state of unconditional love for their obsession. (Bless 'em!) Thing is, 'unconditional' doesn't cut it at the movies, because good work only happens under GOOD conditions, which means fans need to stay critically objective as well as just enthusiastic.

    But I'll be crossing my fingers! Good luck, guys!


    -FL

    1. Re:Star Trek Open Source. . ???? by etherlad · · Score: 1

      You don't think D.C. Fontana qualifies as a good writer? :D

      Episode 4, which is apparently going to be feature-length, is being written by Jack Trevino and Ethan Calk, two DS9 writers.

      As far as lighting and special effect, I'm willing to give them leeway given that they're paying for this whole thing out-of-pocket. They don't have a "budget," they can't get donations. They're scraping together what money they have to try to produce episodes of as high quality as they can.

      I think they're doing a fantastic job. They've got a good part of the sets seen in the original series, as well as a shuttlepod. Lots of costumes and props as well. It's pretty amazing.

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
  51. Teaser Trailer (Image) Mirror by scovetta · · Score: 1

    I've put up a mirror of the image. Seems that either ezboard doesn't really have much bandwidth, or the image is hosted on somebody's Nintendo-modded PC.

    teaser image

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  52. Ad-hoc? by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    could this be the beginning of the ad-hoc movement that Cory Doctorow predicted in "Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom"?

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  53. A really nice guy too. by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    I was working as an usher at the AMC theater in Burbank, California (back in 1989) when I ran into him. Even though I was a "nobody", he spent quite a bit of time talking to me about one of my favorite things: Star Trek. :) I'm sure the talk involved nothing new for him, but he humored me anyway. He displayed none of the "I'm an actor, so I'm better than you" mentality, which seems so common among actors. An all-around nice guy!

  54. Re: Legal Ramifications of ST:TNV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this kind of semi-hobbyist context, the easiest way is to simply pay everyone a huge salary. That's money straight out of profits. This trick is also applied by a number of "charitable" non-profit organizations.

  55. This is hardly legally "safe". by jbn-o · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those Star Wars fan films exist at the behest of Lucasfilm. That permission can be withdrawn at any time and one can lose their permission to legally redistribute the fan films. This is part of the power a copyright holder gets--the power to set terms for derivative works. Sometimes this power is used for maximizing benefit for the many (such as the GNU GPL's implementation of copyleft which aims to preserve the freedom to share and modify for all recipients of the covered program), most of the time it is not.

    The same situation exists for Paramount and Star Trek--Star Trek New Voyages is legally made and distributed so long as Paramount does not deem it a threat (like the Borg when people beam on board one of their cubes and walk around carrying big guns). And this doesn't even begin to get into trademark issues.

    For copyright law, all the real power is with the copyright holders unless the fan film is a parody (which Star Trek New Voyages is not). I'd hardly call such a situation "safe" for the fan filmmakers. Even the permission Star Trek New Voyages receives appears to be selective and revocable.

    Our copyright and trademark laws don't have to work this way, but they are structured to give more power to businesses. Multinational corporate publishers like Lucasfilm and Paramount have the means to sue and have lobbied the US Congress to make sure that copyright law is on their side. If you look at this in terms of one or two particular instances where smaller filmmakers get the permission they seek (for now), you're missing the point. Richard Stallman has been talking about a more sanely structured copyright regime, one which draws a clear line between commercial and non-commercial activity. Examples like Star Wars fan films and Star Trek New Voyages have a profound effect on his thinking. He ends up arguing for allowing all sorts of non-commercial activity that most copyright regimes prohibit by default.

  56. Re:not dead yet? by mr.mighty · · Score: 1
    That's not meant to be funny; William Shatner really is doing All Bran adverts here in the UK.

    He's doing them in Canada, too.
  57. DVD image of Ep 1 is in an RAR archive by saw · · Score: 1

    I am downloading New Voyages episodes using the torrents. Episode 2 is availble as an iso, but the DVd image for Episode 1 is in an RAR file. Is there any open source utility unrar utility? Any why does anyone use RAR when there are other more open compression formats that are presumably as good or better?

    1. Re:DVD image of Ep 1 is in an RAR archive by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Because WinRAR is really easy to use maybe?

      I don't know about you, but the Windows version of 7zip is really, really bad.

  58. Bester was a great character by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. Many of the best moments in B5 related to the established supporting roles rather than the main players like Sheridan and Delenn. Bester was perhaps first among them (though a certain Ranger gave him a run for his money). The Core Is Mother, The Core Is Father was one of the most interesting episodes, and the depth Koenig brought to a character that only actually appeared in a handful of episodes during the five series was remarkable.

    Part of me thinks it's a shame they never made Whatever Happened To Mr Bester, to resolve the Bester-Garibaldi storyline where you can work out what happened but you don't know how. Perhaps that's a trademark of the show -- you have to read between the lines, but if you do, there isn't much that isn't tidied up by the end -- but there was so much scope for an episode where Bester was viewed from both sides that it seems a missed opportunity. In another lifetime, perhaps...

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Bester was a great character by driftingwalrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Corps, not core.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    2. Re:Bester was a great character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D'oh. Sorry, shouldn't do three things at once...

  59. Re:not dead yet? by Trepalium · · Score: 1

    They're running in Canada, too. Can never figure out if I should laugh or cringe.

    --
    I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  60. D. C. Fontana by meburke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is really pretty good news. I noticed that there was distinct difference in some episodes I liked, and realized that they were written to emphsize the "people" problems and psychological adjustments of the characters rather than just the technology or new worlds/experiences aspects. Then I noticed that these episodes were almost always written by Dorothy (D. C.) Fontana. She also contributed some of the absolute best episodes of "Police Woman" with Angie Dickenson. If Walter and D.C. are enthused about this project, I look forward to seeing it.

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  61. Is this legal? by Free_Trial_Thinking · · Score: 1

    Is it legal for fans to just pick up and make new episodes of Star Trek? I figured there'd be copyright problems and such.

    I've always wanted to make Back to the Future IV but I figured I wasn't allowed to. That would be cool if I could do that.
    (If anyone wants to fund back to the future IV, reply to this post and we'll be in touch ;-)

    1. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to fund Black to the Future IV. We'll definately be in touch. Have you been screened?

    2. Re:Is this legal? by Free_Trial_Thinking · · Score: 1

      What do you mean been screened?

  62. for the love of god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...next time, use a spell checker!

    1. Re:for the love of god... by tloh · · Score: 1

      I will if you can get Taco to implement one in the slashcode. :-P

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  63. Re:not dead yet? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    Is this the one where he's mispronouncing yogurt (er, yoghurt)? I was in London a couple of weeks ago and saw that. As an American, I guess I didn't quite get the humor - his pronunciation sounded just fine to me. =]

  64. Re: Legal Ramifications of ST:TNV by blincoln · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly from the audio commentary for the (AWESOME) mirror universe Enterprise episodes, the New Voyages crew loaned Paramount the motorized pop-up Viewmaster thing for the bridge of the Defiant.

    Assuming I'm not completely making that up, it sounds like relations between the two groups are pretty good.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  65. Re:not dead yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > That's not meant to be funny; William Shatner really is doing All Bran adverts here in the UK.

    "Promise?" :)

  66. Pretty lame, who cares about the spelling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all you can fucking do is nit-pick spelling, you're one lame mother fucker... Get off your anonymous coward ass and contribute something meaningful.

    1. Re:Pretty lame, who cares about the spelling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that you posted annonymously complaining about another AC.

      Stranger still is that I did.....

  67. Impossible to download by Theovon · · Score: 1

    I've been trying and trying to download these episodes, but all the mirrors are down, and the trackers are down for the torrents.

  68. We'll always have Firefly by Urusai · · Score: 1

    Look, it's a Western in space!

    Not enough evil midget geniuses, though.

  69. publicity stunt? by E8086 · · Score: 1

    In TOS he was 30 playing a 20-something Ensign Chekov, now he's almost 70, how's he going to play a 20 or 30-something Lt Chekov?

    Yes, I've probably seen every episode and movie of TOS and B5 with Koenig in them and his work is very good. I just have to throw out the idea that it could be a bring in the big names stunt as was done with Enterprise in an attempt to draw back more viewers after it was moved to Friday where it had to compete with SG-1, not a good idea since enough people wanted to watch both. Is he going to stay with New Voyages or will it be a few guest staring appearances for the show's publicity?

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    1. Re:publicity stunt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um? You understand that this is a fan-created series, right? And that "competition" for viewers doesn't really matter, right...?

    2. Re:publicity stunt? by etherlad · · Score: 1

      He's playing a 70-year-old Ensign Chekov.

      We don't know much about the episode at this point, but the plot seems to be that Chekov (played by Andy Bray) has suddenly aged to his twilight years. Similar to the episode where everyone except Chekov rapidly ages over the course of several days. The ep's largely about how he deals with life now that he's old.

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
  70. Actual Press Release and some FAQ by HatofPig · · Score: 1

    Hey all,

    I'm a regular at the NV forum (a little Googling will help you find it; won't link it to avoid another slashdotting), and I thought that I'd give some details here.

    Here are the questions (and presumptions) that I see most often asked (and made), and I'll try to answer them.

    Won't NV get sued by Paramount?

    Nope, because they allow it as long as they make no profit. All of this is payed for from the pockets of all the volunteers that make this.

    How good is it?

    Honestly, avoid the first episode if you are skeptical. The second one was great, and well worth watching. Bare in mind though that the second episode (In Harm's Way) was intended to be a great big "everthing and the kitchen sink" spectacular story, and now they are going to calm down on the flashbacks and tie-ins and gimmicks and time travel, and get back to some good 'ol TOS. Oh, and brush up on your "Doomsday Machine", "City on the Edge of Forever", and "The Cage" (or "The Menagerie 1&2" will work too).

    What's with Kirk's hair?

    Mr. Cawley, who plays Kirk, is a professional Elvis impersonator (giggle) and that job is what keeps NV funded, so don't knock it. It'll be cut and such for episode three.

    Isn't Walter Koenig a little old for playing Chekov circa TOS?

    Um... duh. The role of Chekov at his expected age will be played by their new Chekov actor, Andy Bray (perfect casting; he looks nearly perfect). Somehow he'll get old or something (they are holding out) and then Koenig's Chekov will have to deal with that or something. Pardon my ambiguity, but they want to keep it hush hush and I'm on the outside.

    So will this story involve time travel or rehashes or holodeck fantasies or some other stupid plotpoint?

    No. It's being kept secret, but Jack has promised that it won't be that stuff. Nor will it be "The Deadly Years II". ;)

    I don't like the recasting. I can't picture anyone else in the roles.
    This is common, and I guess that I can only suggest to open your mind. These guys are trying their best, and they are amateurs so keep the criticism constructive.

    Who the hell is Lt. DeSalle?

    DeSalle, who is played by Ron Boyd, is a character whipped up to replace Sulu in the first episode when the Sulu actor split just before production. He's developing into an interesting character, and will probably have some rivalry with Sulu (now being played in this and future episodes by John Lim).

    What happened to Yeoman Rand? She was only ever the Captain's eyecandy, not a Lt. or a helmsman

    Yeah. For those of you who skip Episode I (I suggest it if you have low tolerance of amateur productions), Rand got a promotion during the beginning of this fourth season. They decided to "reinvent" the character as a little more useful and intelligent (and a redhead ;) ). Personally, I like the change.

    Wow.... the actor who played Scotty made a hell of an improvement from episode I to episode II!

    Yeah... probably 'cause it's not the same actor. Right before episode I started production, the Scotty actor bailed, and Jack Marshall, the Director/Executive Producer had to hop in the role (and he looks nothing like Scotty, FYI). Since then Charles Root has adopted the role and is doing a bang-up job of it too.

    Will there ever be a crossover episode with the other fan films like Starship Exeter or Star Trek: Hidden Frontier?

    Well, with Exeter it's kinda iffy since they have totally different goals and such. (NV is trying to bring TOS into the 90's and slowly set it up for The Motion Picture and the following series, and Exeter is trying to be as sixties nostalgic as possible and doesn't look to be including any future stuff anytime soon, not to mention totally against recasting).

    However, James Cawley (NV's Kirk) is playin

    --
    Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
    1. Re:Actual Press Release and some FAQ by etherlad · · Score: 1

      Just a few side notes on what you said...

      DeSalle, who is played by Ron Boyd, is a character whipped up to replace Sulu in the first episode when the Sulu actor split just before production. He's developing into an interesting character, and will probably have some rivalry with Sulu (now being played in this and future episodes by John Lim).

      While they did put Ron Boyd in as DeSalle because the previous Sulu bailed, they didn't make DeSalle up. He was actually featured in many original series episodes. (The Squire of Gothos, This Side of Paradise, Catspaw.)

      Check out his Memory Alpha entry (Memory Alpha is a Trek Wiki).

      What happened to Yeoman Rand? She was only ever the Captain's eyecandy, not a Lt. or a helmsman

      The first NV episode establishes that the reason she was absent for Seasons 2 and 3 of TOS was because she was receiving "additional training" at Starfleet. So now she's a more in-charge kinda gal rather than Kirk's secretary.

      Sulu's absence in the first episode is also explained as additional training. The NV crew has mentioned that when he returns, it'll be for a sort of training mission (think TNG's Peak Performance), with Sulu acting as First Officer. So there may not be a lot of Sulu/DeSalle rivalry.

      I like the crew reshuffling. It gives them the opportunity to further develop certain characters and explore more about their personalities. As well as helping to bridge the gap between TOS and the movies.

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
  71. Re:Welshy by dtungsten · · Score: 1

    It was a gag partly because Dames Doohan refused to be on the show. James's response was "No way."

    I heard this from one of the series's writers (who also showed a rough cut of Route of All Evil) at a convention before the show aired.

  72. Re:High Price of Star Trek DVDs by dtungsten · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I recently purchased the complete Lost in Space (three seasons) for $120. That's about the same number of episodes as the original Star Trek.

  73. DC Fontana by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    Well, I took a quick look at the imdb link. DC Fontana seems to be one of the writers/story editors behind classic Star Trek as well as a whole ton of big sci-fi movies and series. Cool thread, thanks for starting it. I learned something.

  74. this is horible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only star treck fan out there that thinks this is some of the worst acting imaginable? And the writing is unbelievably bad. The special affects are not as good as they did in the 1960s. What a bunch of over rated crap. This thing is embarrassing.

  75. Wife? by ThePyro · · Score: 1

    The woman manipulated by the Shadows was actually Bester's lover, not his wife. His marriage was arranged by the Psi Corps, and his wife was still safe and sound back home.

  76. Re:not dead yet? by jshaft · · Score: 1

    Picture ...
    yourself ...
    in a boat on ...
    a ...
    river, ...


    With tangerine ...
    trees ...
    and ...
    marmalade skies ...

  77. test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    test