Slashdot Mirror


Free Gentoo Technical Support

Anonymous Coward writes to tell us that GenUX is offering free technical support for anyone using Gentoo Linux. I spoke briefly with one of their support staff and he assured me that it would be completely free Gentoo tech support for approximately 2 weeks to help them 'work out the kinks' of their new support system. GenUX is offering this support through both web-based chat and the traditional phone call. I certainly hope this catches on.

209 comments

  1. Is it offered in lojban? by Fen14 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Support in lojban is highly useful, especially since it is the most common language of computer using people.

  2. No way! by PopeOptimusPrime · · Score: 5, Funny

    What kind of Gentoo nerd would I be if I called tech support?

  3. Customer Support...Beta! by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    Yay - two weeks of Beta Testers for Gentoo Tech Support!

    I'd be curious to know what they've done :)

    --LWM

    1. Re:Customer Support...Beta! by Angostura · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well exactly, it's two weeks free support while they get their tech support lines running correctly. Or, alternatively, it's two weeks free support in return for a front page posting on Slashdot.

      I'm slightly curious about the original poster's assertion that "I certainly hope this catches on." What does (s)he hope catches on; that distro companies offer free service while beta-ing their service? Seems an odd thing to wish for, since it's a one-time offer that's hardly going to set the world alight.

    2. Re:Customer Support...Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tech Support: [recording] "Thank you for calling your free tech support service. While you are on hold, please enjoy informative messages from our sponsors." [15 minutes of ads] [person answers] "Thank you for calling, can I have your information please? Can I interest you in a subscription? Would you like to buy a product upgrade? I am sorry your free tech support time is up. Thank you for calling."

      I dont know anything about this company but this is what free tech support sounds like to me.

    3. Re:Customer Support...Beta! by gid13 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they aren't that concerned with paying a little bit but don't want to hire an admin, and hope that tech support for Linux becomes more mainstream so that there's competition to drive prices down?

    4. Re:Customer Support...Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll notice that the email address fo the article poster is from gen-ux.com... ;]

    5. Re:Customer Support...Beta! by wolf31o2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the business is geared towards smaller outfits. Maybe not one without an admin, but perhaps one with only a single admin and older computers. In fact, at their presentation at the Gentoo Developer Conference after LWE:SF, they specifically mentioned older machines in their presentation. You can view their entire presentation online at http://devconference.gentoo.org/ (warning, streaming video). They were last in the afternoon session.

    6. Re:Customer Support...Beta! by s.d. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm slightly curious about the original poster's assertion that "I certainly hope this catches on." What does (s)he hope catches on; that distro companies offer free service while beta-ing their service? Seems an odd thing to wish for, since it's a one-time offer that's hardly going to set the world alight.

      While one of the other responders to you is correct, and the email address from the submittor is a gen-ux.com email addr, I think the "I certainly hope this catches on," comment in the post comes from the editor. /. tends to quote a submittor, and then non quoted text is from the editor, in this case, ScuttleMonkey. The posting looks like a GenUX person submitted a story saying, "we got this thing," and from the rest of the post, it looks like ScuttleMonkey called them up, checked it out, and posted his feelings on the topic, with no real commentary by the submittor in the posting at all. Anyway, that's how it read to me...

  4. Cool, but by Coocha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their documentation is already pretty good; between that and the forums, I don't see how useful live support would be; Gentoo has always seemed like the hobbyists' distro to me (disclaimer: I run it, and know people who use it in production environments). It just seems to me that if support is important to a person/firm, they'll pony up the $50/$100/$whatever for a license that offers support as well.

    --
    May the threads progress competently.
    1. Re:Cool, but by wangmaster · · Score: 1

      That's sorta my thought. There already is free tech support in gentoo bugzilla and their forums. 99% of the problems I've had have been either solved by filing a bug (or reading a bug in buzilla) or going to the forums. The few problems that haven't been addressable there I can't imagine another web forum or chat support is going to be able to do much more of.

    2. Re:Cool, but by temojen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes there are differences between the documents and reality. Also, the documents tend to assume that everything went according to plan and your system has not been customized (bad assumption with gentoo). I.E. the documents for the recent changes to the config file layout for apache2 assumes you're not using mass virtual hosting.

    3. Re:Cool, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their documentation is already pretty good

      Bollocks is it. I use Gentoo and I'm fairly happy with it, but the documentation is one of the worst things about it. It seems whenever I have problems and need to resort to the documentation, there is always something that's downright wrong about it. You report bugs, but they never seem to get fixed. It's not like I'm a stereotypical newbie, I've written ebuilds and the like, and yet even I have difficulty following the docs when they are wrong.

    4. Re:Cool, but by KentoNET · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You obviously don't hang around #gentoo (FN) too often. That channel is basically continuous live support, granted it's to users from users (and developers).

      As developers, some of us try to make it a point to help people who are having trouble with the packages we maintain. Any help we can get is welcome, so I for one appreciate GenUX's contribution, even if they make money from it.

      --
      "You tried your best and failed miserably. The lesson is...never try. Heh!" -Homer
    5. Re:Cool, but by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I search for answers to any generic linux issue the Gentoo wiki invariably has the answer. They've already got such good documentation that live support is only useful to the kind of people that... well... shouldn't be using Gentoo.

      --
      World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
    6. Re:Cool, but by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, docs are always out of date and make unstated assumptions. Are you telling me these tech support folks will be any different? I predict this tech support line will be an expensive text-to-speech interface for forums.gentoo.org. What else would it be? There's no way a person could learn all the combinations of libraries, applications, configurations, and hardware (many versions of each).

  5. "Sir, could you please hold?" by theurge14 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I apologize sir, our system is compiling. Thanks for holding."

    /obligatory... and ha ha, really I'm a Gentoo user

    1. Re:"Sir, could you please hold?" by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny


      Or it would be - "Your call is important to us, please hold. Approximate compile time is 24 hours."

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:"Sir, could you please hold?" by KillShill · · Score: 1

      it's funny cause it's true. :-)

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    3. Re:"Sir, could you please hold?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's funny cause it's true. :-)

      Oh really?
      I dont know what kernel you are running, but the one I run here is quite capable of multitasking ....

    4. Re:"Sir, could you please hold?" by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Huh? What's true?

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    5. Re:"Sir, could you please hold?" by bertramwooster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Its more likely to be the reverse.

      Customer: X is not working...

      Support : did you try "emerge Y"?

      Customer: Oh! lemme try...
                          hmmm... er, can you hold on for a couple of hours please?

  6. Developer by mysqlrocks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The press release says you will be able to get support "from a Gentoo developer". Is this accurate? Will you actually get to talk to a developer? Most places have you talk to a tech support person not the actual developers.

    1. Re:Developer by genux_jcohen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes one of GenUX's goals is to higher Gentoo Developers. Most (all but 1) of the Technical Support Staff is a registered Gentoo Dev.

    2. Re:Developer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of your developers do work for GenUX, though I have no knowledge about their roles within GenUX.

    3. Re:Developer by stevey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd love to see you "higher" Gentoo developers. The world needs more tall people ...

    4. Re:Developer by Adelbert · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yes one of GenUX's goals is to higher Gentoo Developers

      Maybe they could just get all the Gentoo hackers to stand on cardboard boxes? Sometimes, the simplest solutions are the best.Although I guess that's not a very Gentoo mentality.

    5. Re:Developer by Knome_fan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Higher?

      This explains a lot... ;-D
      *passesjointaround*

    6. Re:Developer by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Clearly, he's referring to Gentoo being "Intelligently Designed", and he wants to raise the company's Developers to that level so they can intelligently design too.

    7. Re:Developer by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Funny

      So that's why the Portage system has so many winking smiley faces.. ;-)

    8. Re:Developer by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      get support "from a Gentoo developer"

      I sense a black lottery going on there.

      "Sorry Bill, 74 was the winning ticket. Guess you're on tech support this week." As two burly developers hold down a kicking and screaming Bill while a 3rd places a headset on him...

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    9. Re:Developer by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      What disgusts me is that you wasted your time typing up that response, thinking people will care.

      We really don't.

      And what disgusts me more is that I decided to respond to you to tell you what a waste of time it was to respond to him and point out how you're just ohh-soooo disgusted. I think we both need a life. Or less downtime at work?

    10. Re:Developer by 51mon · · Score: 1

      Rumours of a plan to hire key GNU/Linux people and get them doing other stuff, sounds more like a Microsoft scheme to undermine Gentoo.

      Answering support calls, not even Microsoft would sink that low.

  7. Hope what catches on? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You mean guinea pig tech support offers that are limited time while they work the bugs out of their system?

    While this may be mildly helpful- especially in the latter portion of the trial, how helpful will it really be? Techs fumbling around for an answer, problems transferring calls, long queue times? Either way, those of us who know what we're doing- if the problem is bad enough that we need to call, is our problem going to happen during their short trial?

    Either way, hope what catches on again?

    1. Re:Hope what catches on? by rueger · · Score: 1

      "Techs fumbling around for an answer, problems transferring calls, long queue times? " It's really refreshing to see someone in the Open Source community try to meet or exceed the same fine quality of support provided by commercial software houses. Can copy protection and shrinkwrap licenced be far behind?

    2. Re:Hope what catches on? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      You start with something very true and right on, and then jump to a strange place after that.

      By nature, open source software cannot have copy protection, at least not in source form.

      As far as "shrinkwrap licensed", I'm not sure exactly what you mean?

  8. Two weeks free support? by paulwallen · · Score: 4, Funny

    The compilation takes two weeks on machine? By the time I finish it, the support is over. No good

    1. Re:Two weeks free support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The compilation takes two weeks on machine? By the time I finish it, the support is over. No good
      Try using a stage3 build then, if you insist on trying to run gentoo with KDE on your 486.
    2. Re:Two weeks free support? by kcarlin · · Score: 1

      The compilation takes two weeks on machine? By the time I finish it, the support is over. No good

      This is where the CFO's decision to stand by those reliable 386 workstations proves a tad shortsighted.

      --
      Free Adam Smith! (Or best offer.)
  9. I already know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...they advised one guy to rebuild his 486.

    1. Re:I already know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! You're funny! Will you be here all week?!

  10. Certainly hope it catches on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean beta testing a system? I think that caught on about 20 years ago.

    As for free tech support, that's not really what this is about, just testing. In two weeks their system will be up and running (most likely at the level they need it to be), and they traded support for free testers. Don't worry, after they'll charge just like all other support. You can't expect everything to be free.

  11. I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will they stay with you while you watch the system compile your selected code?

    Tech support usually is unhappy is you have to sit with them for a couple days at a time.

  12. No such thing as free beer by timeToy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Form the press release: "During the initial release of this program, GenUX will be in a testing phase, and will be offering free support during this time"
    Support is free for few weeks, then you have to paid the traditionally high support costs
    http://www.gen-ux.com/catalog

    1. Re:No such thing as free beer by OneSeventeen · · Score: 1

      The problem with traditionally high costs, is that means you can probably find someone else that offers cheaper support.

      Take Ubuntu's support for example. For $100 USD I can make 10 online requests for help for one year, or I can pay $250/year for up to 25 support requests, which includes phone support as well.

      --
      "Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed." -C.S. Lewis
  13. Re:OSS piracy by genux_jcohen · · Score: 5, Informative

    What OSS Piracy did GenUX commit? Talk to any Gentoo Dev that works with us and you will see all of our code except the closed source (gpl free) compile farm has been released one way or another back to the community. GenUX has even funded paying for Bugs in Gentoo for almost 8 months.

  14. Great Idea.... by wilsone8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I certainly hope this catches on.

    <sarcasm>Yes, because their are just such a pethera of other ways to make any money selling Linux that getting rid of the tech support side of the house would make everything a lot simpler.</sarcasm>

    --
    The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do. - B.F. Skinner
    1. Re:Great Idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      emerge aspell

  15. Look out! by Nightreaver · · Score: 2, Informative

    Once your addicted, the price goes from free to... well... not free.

    Anyway they're still doing the right thing, since Gentoo is the-one-and-only Linux distro ;-)

    1. Re:Look out! by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Gentoo is the-one-and-only Linux distro ;-)

      Says the person who has not yet tried Arch linux. It's like gentoo, but faster, and with no compile times. And SIMPLER! Oh, it's great.

  16. There really is no need.. by technomancer68 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gentoo has excellent documentation for installing their OS whether you are choosing the more difficult installation or the canned installation. Not only that, if you have a problem the forums that they have set up is superiour. It seemed like any question I had was answered within a few hours of asking, sometimes minutes.

    --

    The Technomancer
    "Men of lofty genius when they are doing the least work are most active."-
    1. Re:There really is no need.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know this, I know this, a lot of others know it, but apparently a big enough group of people don't, and that's where they apply clever marketing. :)

      One can't blame them for taking advantage of other people's ignorance :)

  17. Very Cool by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That's really cool but I've always found the Gentoo community to be extremely supportive. That's one of my reasons for using Gentoo. I've learned so much from using Gentoo and just getting help from the community. Before Gentoo, compiling the kernel scared me but the Gentoo Handbook was excellent. When I screwed up because I forgot to compile my NIC drivers, I was able to get help from the forums on how to to boot with the LiveCD and start from where I left off. I've had another user with a similar problem as me on how to use Kerberos with AD. After he found the solution, he messaged me to offer to lead me through it.

    Unbelivable community unity.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  18. Great! by clrscr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Up to now I had to run down to Wendy's in-between shift changes to get to talk to a Linux developer!

    1. Re:Great! by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      That was the funniest thing I've read all day!

    2. Re:Great! by bigredradio · · Score: 1

      I agree. This should be modded up to 5-funny (since it doesn't go to 11)

    3. Re:Great! by flood6 · · Score: 2, Funny
      This reminds me of another I heard:
      Q: What do you do when a OSS developer comes to your office?

      A: Pay for the pizza.

  19. Re:OSS piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was an off-topic joke that had nothing to do with GenUX. It was posted in the wake of the RIAA article over the weekend to mock the two-sided attitude towards copyright that Slashdotters have, citing the CherryOS article as an example. Sorry for the confusion.

  20. Very real need... by Phil+John · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...in a corp IT environment "answered within hours, sometimes minutes" doesn't cut it. If you wanted to deploy Gentoo in any serious company setting you need to know that there are people you can call 24-7 who know how to fix whatever's not working.

    I've never used Gentoo before (fedora man myself) but for it to be taken seriously for hosting critical apps this type of service is required.

    You and I both know any competent sysadmin worth their salt will know how to diagnose and fix problems but PHB's want to be able to phone a vendor and vent down the phone, it's like a comfort blanket to them.

    --
    I am NaN
    1. Re:Very real need... by jimcooncat · · Score: 1

      "in a corp IT environment "answered within hours, sometimes minutes" doesn't cut it."

      Gee, maybe it would be worthwhile to actually pay for support in this instance.

    2. Re:Very real need... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would. But up till now, I don't think there has been possible to pay for Gentoo support. At least, not from the actual developers, unless some of them do that for their day job. This is why Redhat is so successful as a "pay for support" distro - management wants to be able to give someone a hard time if there's a problem, and Redhat provides that kind of support.

    3. Re:Very real need... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      What kind of support does Fedora offer, anyway? :)

      I'm partial to the idea of hiring a sysadmin who knows what he's doing, so there won't *be* problems - but then, I'm that sysadmin, so I'm biased...

    4. Re:Very real need... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

      What kind of support does Fedora offer, anyway? :)

      The same as Gentoo up until now, none past community efforts like wiki's and the forums, which is why I use RHEL on any production machines ;o)

      Number of times we've had to rely on support from RedHat? 0.

      Warm fuzzy feeling we get from being able to rely on them, priceless.

      --
      I am NaN
  21. Re:OSS piracy by delire · · Score: 4, Funny

    GenUX has even funded paying for Bugs in Gentoo..
    That's not very nice!
  22. Two weeks? by fumanchu32 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Two weeks? It will take longer than that for my computer to compile Gentoo :)

    1. Re:Two weeks? by phsdv · · Score: 1

      Well maybe that is why GenUX offers binary Gentoo packages?

      Secondly maybe you should upgrade your 60MHz 80386 to a more current model ;-)

  23. test by Apreche · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just tried it out, because I've got some burning gentoo questions that nobody on the forums can answer.

    First off, their web chat interface was crazy broken. It just reloaded a thousand times a second.

    Their phone support was actually really good. I was surprised that it wasn't slashdotted. I didn't have to wait at all. The sad part is that calling them was about the equivalent of calling myself on the phone. They did the same google search that I did and found the same stuff I did. This is really only good for people who don't have a geeky friend who knows as much as I do. For now it's free call them with everything you've got. But it wont be worth paying for because they are no better able to answer the burning ultra hard questions than you or I.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What questions would those be?

  24. Interesting quote... by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...one of the most popular Linux distributions... ...Historically, Gentoo Linux has been one of the most stable and popular Linux distributions for power Linux users...

    Wait... what?... Popular and stable???

    Either they've confused Gentoo with Debian, or they're talking up their prospectus to sell shares...

    (I choose Gentoo because of it's flexibility)

    1. Re:Interesting quote... by moranar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, not to mention the "Hystorically" bit... It's one of the newest distros around, for chrissakes!

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    2. Re:Interesting quote... by surprise_audit · · Score: 3, Insightful
      (I choose Gentoo because of it's flexibility)

      I chose Gentoo because, at the time, it was one of the few Linux distros that support Sparc. Redhat gave up around 6.1, which prompted the switch. I realize now that this is probably a bogus impression, but it seemed back then that Debian was behind the times, with packages older than Redhat's, and several different package managers, all of which struck me as a bit weird. In comparison, Gentoo's emerge seemed amazingly easy to use. So now I've got a bunch of x86 & Sparc systems that present an identical user experience and never mind the radically different architecture underneath.

    3. Re:Interesting quote... by vlad_grigorescu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First off, Gentoo can be very stable if set up correctly. If you're running ~x86 then yeah, it might not be the stablest. But Gentoo's whole principle is that it is based on *choice*. You can choose to run a very stable, very powerful OS. In fact, that is how it comes by default. If you start unmasking things, and installing packages that have not been extensively tested, well... it's your computer. Again, choice. As far as "historically" (yes, spelled with an "i") goes, Gentoo has been around since _at least_ the end of 2001. I think that 4 years is a decent amount of time to compare it to other distributions. Gentoo has undergone several different versions, and a couple of major revisions, like any other distro that's been around for a while. Through all the changes, some things have remained constant: the popularity, and the ability to have a stable system. Finally, like the quote said it's for the power linux users. You cannot come here and bitch and moan about how Gentoo is "ghey" if you are just now "trying" to switch from Windows to Linux. Yes, there are distributions out there that "just work". Power users are not content with those. Gentoo's philosophy is that the enduser should have control over their system. Yes, this requires a bit more work, maybe, but the rewards can be enormous if you know what you are doing. Again, Gentoo, and all of Linux to an extent, is about choice. There is a distro out there that is right for you. For some it's Gentoo. For others, it's Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, whatever. You can go ahead and run what you like, but bashing other distros, just because they weren't suited for *your* needs helps no one.

    4. Re:Interesting quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      God DAMN I've had no end to frustration with getting shit to work with Gentoo.
      Amen, brother. Debian ftw.
    5. Re:Interesting quote... by moranar · · Score: 1

      If Gentoo is completely "about choice", then gentoo isn't unstable or stable. It's the user that's a good chooser.

      When you have Mandriva, Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, Slackware and many other distros, both stable and older than Gentoo, you wonder what exactly does "historically more stable and secure" means, and compared to what. I use Mandriva, which by all accounts isn't the most stable of the lot, though with your reasoning, it could be too... After all, I just have to choose the right package to keep it chugging along.

      Second, lighten up. Nobody but you talked about "ghey", bashed, or insulted Gentoo in any way. And please don't assume whether I or anyone else is trying to use Linux for the first time. I've been using Mandrake and other distros since 1999.

      Perhaps you weren't talking about my particular post, but since it's the one you replied to...

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    6. Re:Interesting quote... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's got all the cutting edge software from 1995!

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    7. Re:Interesting quote... by vlad_grigorescu · · Score: 1

      The ghey comments and the ones about being a power user were for the reply right under yours.

    8. Re:Interesting quote... by moranar · · Score: 1

      You're answering to flaming anonymous cowards. Don't even bother, it's not worth it... I hadn't seen that because I normally only watch +2 posts (when replying I check at 0, so even then it didn't show up).

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    9. Re:Interesting quote... by Drakonite · · Score: 1
      Yeah, not to mention the "Hystorically" bit... It's one of the newest distros around, for chrissakes!

      I think they mean that historically it was more stable than it is now, since they have been regularly causing huge issues by breaking packages, configs, and the layout in the updates.

      I've had to completely reinstall due to cumulative breakage caused solely by bad decisions made by the gentoo devs, and I now regret staying with gentoo at the time because of the massive repairs I've had to due, such as the numerous hours it took to get apache working correctly again because they decided they didn't like how they had the config files setup.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    10. Re:Interesting quote... by m50d · · Score: 1

      I use it because it seems to be the only distro up to date enough to support a) my horrible software raid b) my sound card.

      --
      I am trolling
    11. Re:Interesting quote... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      "Historically more stable and secure" - because the user chooses, and those who use gentoo are power users who know how to keep their machines secure and stable.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:Interesting quote... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the difference that correct gcc flags makes on sparc..
      Sparv7 (the oldest sparc still supported by linux) lacks some long division instructions which are present on sparcv8 and sparcv7.. Things like OpenSSL make heavy use of these instructions..
      Distributions like debian and redhat come precompiled for sparcv7, so they run very poorly on sparcv8/v9 machines, a lowend sparcv8 can take a matter of minutes to accept an ssh connection... There was a talk on osnews about the huge difference building for sparcv8 over sparcv7 can make.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    13. Re:Interesting quote... by moranar · · Score: 1

      That made so little sense it's dizzying. Many (for varying amounts of "many") gentoo users are l337 k33dz who just spend hours "optimizing" without a clue. Apart from the fact that there are plenty of power users that like other distros.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    14. Re:Interesting quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run Gentoo at home on an athlon, and absolutely love it. Unfortunately when I tried to install it on a sparc box at work I found that Sun's JDK/JVM isn't available for linux on sparc!

      What a pain! It looks like I gotta stick with Solaris, until sun ship a JDK/JVM for linux/sparc, which'll probably be never. Obviously this is not gentoo's fault, rather Sun's.

  25. If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by ThaFooz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... they would fix all of the broken ebuilds. Of all of Gentoo's issues, support is not one of them, their forums are really the best I've seen. The biggest problem is the portage is not scaling well, largely due to the high number of crappy submitted ebuilds, and the low number of testers and devs. It feels like its got much worse in the past year or two, with broken packages often making it to 'stable' and critical apps staying hard masked (the delay in MySQL 4.1, PHP5, and all of the Apache issues are my favorite examples).

    I do love Gentoo & Portage, but so long as 'emerge -upD world' will fail consistently even on the most conservative use flags & keywords, I'll be using another distro.

    1. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by stevey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Broken builds seem like they should be simple to detect.

      Have a machine download the most recently submitted "ebuild" files, then attempt to build the binaries. Any failures would then result in a new bug being filed automatically.

      That would be a useful service to offer - if you wished to help.

      Sure you wouldn't catch bugs which were in the binaries, like immediate segfaults, or in configuration file options. But a simple "compile it" test should be trivial to script...

    2. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by drijen · · Score: 1

      i agree. Each time i have tried to install gentoo, i have run into massive issues with broken ebuilds during the stage 1 or stage 2 install. Each time, i got fed up complaining about the "quality control" of the install ebuilds and went back to http://www.slackware.com/ or http://www.crux.nu/. Crux has a BSD ports system that works better than portage, IMHO, and its a lot easier to deal with. Each to his own of course, but there are always other options :)

    3. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 2, Informative

      This seems to be a recurring problem when people don't use the most up-to-date and unstable versions of things- often there isn't much work put into making sure stable things STAY fixed.

      While I've always run Gentoo with the unstable packages accepted (nearly everything works, actually, on my x86... and if something does fail, syncing the next day and updating almost always fixes it), I had a lot of problems when I tried to use -stable freeBSD. Packages failed to fetch, meaning I had to go hunt them down... one or two things also didn't compile. I switched to whatever the next step up from -stable is (don't remember any more...) and the problems all went away. Go figure.

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
    4. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've been running Gentoo on 6 machines (workstations, servers, and laptops) for a few years now and have generally found the quality to be outstanding. IME, you get a mildly broken ebuild only once in a while and for me, someone's already got a workaround posted to a forum by the time it hits me. I'm pretty conservative in my use flags and package keywords, but I do "emerge -uDN world" almost every day (on all machines). You might have worse luck if you're running ~x86 or something.

      The only annoying thing for me is that every once in a while they change file layouts, such as recently w/ apache2. The change is A Good Thing because the files look more like what you'd get from an upstream source install, but it was still a bit disruptive.

      OTOH, no distro is problem free and AFAIC, Gentoo is the absolutely easiest distro to maintain over the long haul.

    5. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by Utoxin · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's interesting. I run Gentoo on *counts* 4 or 5 systems. One of those is my desktop, where I run the unstable arch, the others are servers of varying architectures, but I run Stable on all of them. I can't recall the last time I had an ebuild in the install process that was broken. Every now and then, I'll have issues with the PHP or MySQL ebuilds, but they're getting better, and the issues are usually because I catch them in the middle of transitioning to a new structure, like they're doing right now with PHP, moving it to a single package, instead of seperate packages for CLI, CGI, and Apache Module builds.

      --
      Matthew Walker
      http://www.tweeterdiet.com/ - My Diet Tracking Tool
    6. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      I've been using Gentoo for almost a couple of years now, admittedly for my own fairly simple purposes (desktop, router/light server, laptop), and I've never once had a problem with an ebuild. I don't emerge anything fancy, but I ran ~x86 for a year on the desktop without a problem.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    7. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by Jason+Hood · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Have a machine download the most recently submitted "ebuild" files, then attempt to build the binaries.


      While this wouldnt hurt, compilation issues in gentoo are usually do to particular combinations of packages and USE flags. There are quite simply far too many combinations to test for.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    8. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1
      Right now I'm looking at
      !!! ERROR: media-video/transcode-0.6.14-r2 failed.
      !!! Function src_compile, Line 132, Exitcode 2
      !!! emake failed
      !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
      I guess they forgot to test xvid support in transcode, since the same version builds just fine with that use flag turned off. "What? Test things? Bah - it works for me." :( There are 5 versions of transcode marked unstable and one stable. One would think that there was time to either prune the old ones out, or fully stability test one of the newer releases...
    9. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by ferringb · · Score: 1

      I hate that snippet of error msgs. Totally unusable without compilation failures proceeding it.
      You're going to file that at bugs.gentoo.org, right?

    10. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Amen brotha. I've been a semi-rabid Gentoo zealot for a year or two, but one of the biggest things that bugs me is the lack of testing/maintenence that goes into some of the ebuilds. Heck, Java 5 has been out for...some time now, and the ebuild is still "unstable". Heck, I just went to Google Java 5's release date, and my newly-emerged (as of yesterday) Firefox's search widget is busted.

      Gentoo ebuild developers will tell you that this is due to inadequate user feedback. I don't know if that's necessarily the case. Don't get me wrong, I still love Gentoo, but sometimes it gets annoying...

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    11. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Err, umm...yeah. ldconfig fixed my Firefox fast. Pardon the premature pissiness. Also, ignore all this assinine alliteration.

      Still pissed off that Eclipse 3.1 is "unstable", though.

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    12. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

      I agree. My experience is that the more "stable" a program is supposed to be, the less likely it is to actually work.

    13. Re:If they really wanted to help Gentoo... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1
      I'm getting there - I'd like to figure out what the problem is before I officially complain. I figure, if the transcode maintainer(s) knew the solution to the problem, it wouldn't *be* a problem in the latest "unstable" eBuild. :) I just posted the descriptive part here because this is /. and not a bug reporting service, but since you want to know:
      i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D_REENTRANT -DMOD_PATH=\"/usr/lib/transcode\" -I.. -I../src -I../libac3 -I../avilib -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include -I../libvo -I../libioaux -I../libxio -I/usr/include/avifile-0.7 -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/lqt -I/usr/include/mjpegtools -I/usr/include/mjpegtools/mpeg2enc -I/usr/include/mjpegtools/mplex -I/usr/include -I/usr/share/pvm3/include -I../pvm3 -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -march=athlon-mp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fsched-spec-load -fgcse-lm -fgcse-sm -DDCT_YUV_PRECISION=1 -MT export_ffmpeg.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/export_ffmpeg.Tpo -c export_ffmpeg.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/export_ffmpeg.o
      export_ffmpeg.c: In function `export_ffmpeg_init':
      export_ffmpeg.c:677: error: structure has no member named `frame_rate'
      export_ffmpeg.c:678: error: structure has no member named `frame_rate_base'
      export_ffmpeg.c:681: error: structure has no member named `frame_rate'
      export_ffmpeg.c:682: error: structure has no member named `frame_rate_base'
      * those two lines repeat several times*
      make[2]: *** [export_ffmpeg.lo] Error 1
      make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/transcode-0.6.14-r2/work/transco de-0.6.14/export'
      make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
      make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/transcode-0.6.14-r2/work/transco de-0.6.14'
      make: *** [all] Error 2
  26. Re:OSS piracy by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 2

    don't apologize!, you clearly need to go study your craft some more.

  27. I even wrote a program to do this! by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    I've written a program in C to provide technical support to new Gentoo users that behaves like a linux expert! The source code is below.

    #include stdio.h
    int main () { printf("RTFM\n"); }

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:I even wrote a program to do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning: int main should return an int, smart guy

    2. Re:I even wrote a program to do this! by Homology · · Score: 1
      I've written a program in C to provide technical support to new Gentoo users that behaves like a linux expert! The source code is below.

      $ cd /tmp $ cat > rtfm.c #include stdio.h int main () { printf("RTFM\n"); } $ cc rtfm.c rtfm.c:1:10: #include expects "FILENAME" or $

      Hmh, perhaps "man cc" will give you some hints ;-)

    3. Re:I even wrote a program to do this! by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      There should be less than/greater than signs around stdio.h but slashdot formatting removes them. Couldn't figure out how to get slashdot to keep them so I left them out.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    4. Re:I even wrote a program to do this! by Homology · · Score: 1
      Don't we hate it when /. does not know how to interpret pre tags, and I don't know how to use "preview":

      $ cd /tmp
      $ cat > rtfm.c
      #include stdio.h
      int main () { printf("RTFM\n"); }
      $ cc rtfm.c
      rtfm.c:1:10: #include expects "FILENAME" or <FILENAME>
      $
    5. Re:I even wrote a program to do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #include

      int main ()
      {
        printf("RTFM\n");
        return 0;
      }

    6. Re:I even wrote a program to do this! by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think that's the Debian help system...

      ...kidding--happy Debian user who's never been told to RTFM, even though I'm far from an expert and have asked stupid questions. I'm just alluding to their alleged reputation... Actually, as stupid questions go, can someone tell me the difference between the kernel-headers-* and linux-headers-* packages? Confused the hell out of me last night when trying to upgrade to 2.6.12 and recompile a couple of kernel modules (though everything is working now)...

      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    7. Re:I even wrote a program to do this! by PReDiToR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Couldn't figure out how to get slashdot to keep them

      Use &lt;(<) and &gt;(>)

      HTH =)

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    8. Re:I even wrote a program to do this! by cloudmaster · · Score: 1
      I wonder what that "ecode" tag is for?
      #include <stdio.h>
      Oh, must be for including code (or you could use "extrans" or "code" in that dropdown box, BTW). ;)
  28. Re:I have just one question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, but I'd like to see them support this:


    -march=pentium -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mfp-math=sse


    Note -ffuck-up-all-floats is implied
  29. this is modus operandi by mayhemt · · Score: 2, Funny

    CSR: gentoo support how can i help u?
    ./ geek: well i have problem with vwx..i configure y & vwx is messed up & i cannot load the z module & i dont want abc daemon to be kicked in when def server shell is up

    CSR: ooh..hold on sir, while i transfer u to apropriate department..

    after 5-mins...

    CSR: sir, you to have compile def modules with fgh libraries in 3443.115 version & then use the binaries of stuvw to download the ijklm, that will solve the prob.
    ./ geek: Thank you so much. will try it & get back to u if it doesnt work...

    CSR: very much welcome sir (closing the google search page & the forums talking about the same problem)

  30. Re:OSS piracy by genux_jcohen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My fault for not being clear. GenUX has funded Gentoo Devs to fix bugs in Gentoo.

  31. Slashdotting phone lines? by matt+me · · Score: 1

    Wow. I think we've managed to conduct a DDoS on a phone number! Next all we need is to report a Linus Torvalds sighting at X, and we'll create a stampede.

  32. Shameless Self Promotion? by Xibby · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anonymous Coward writes to tell us that GenUX with an e-mail address of hparker@gen-ux.com?

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
    1. Re:Shameless Self Promotion? by slashflood · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward writes to tell us that GenUX with an e-mail address of hparker@gen-ux.com?

      What's wrong with that? You know, that the whole article summary was written by ScuttleMonkey and not by the gen-nux guy? Otherwise, it would be in italics. ScuttleMonkey was the one who spoke to the support staff.

    2. Re:Shameless Self Promotion? by uacheesehead · · Score: 1

      So.. they do some shameless self promotion, and they can't even keep their online chat up and running, knowing that they'll see the /. effect? Or is it that they're using /. as an extreme test case to test their chat software/servers?

    3. Re:Shameless Self Promotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. I guess he just doesn't have a /. id, or has a reason not to use it. If he was really trying to hide his identity he could have remained _completely_ anonymous (and not be 'identified' so easily)...

    4. Re:Shameless Self Promotion? by Tester · · Score: 1

      Interesting... hparker is a gentoo dev.... I didn't know he worked for Gen-ux too..

      The person who "signed" the press release is also the lead of "Gentoo developer relations" aka devrel, the Gentoo HR department.

      I'm still trying to find out who else from Gentoo is involved in that thing.. but I can tell you from the internal mailing list that I'm clearly not the only one to be surprised.

      Disclaimer: I'm also a Gentoo Dev... and I didnt know about this before reading about it on slashdot..

    5. Re:Shameless Self Promotion? by Tester · · Score: 1

      Seems like eradicator also worked from them at some point..

  33. Re:OSS piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont think he was trolling, I'm pretty sure he was trying to clear up the confusion. He didn't take a side or state an opinion.

  34. Astroturfing by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Troll

    Since when has Slashdot ever had issues with Astroturfing for their friends?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  35. I hope not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yes one of GenUX's goals is to higher Gentoo Developers"

    What, are they going to make them smoke dope before they let them take any calls?

    "Yeah man, all you have to do is... uh... what was the question again?"

    1. Re:I hope not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanna take ya hire!

  36. Obligatory (and on-topic) by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I use Gentoo, how does this affect me?

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  37. I certainly hope this catches on by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Generate a Boatload of VC Capital saying we will support Linux
    2. Give away support for Free - including using Slashdot for advertising
    3. ...
    4. **** PROFIT ****

    When will we stop seeing Underpants Gnome business models - Right after we see a spell checker for Slashdot posting I assume

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re: I certainly hope this catches on by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      3. Sharpen your support staff up, stress test systems, and run many queries through support to allow for writing a problem solving database to ensure that when people actually pay for service, they get it.

      Sounds like a solid plan.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  38. Re:This kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm working on a business plan for a gentoo based business. It's amazing what hassles
    emerge sync && emerge -uDfg world && emerge -uDp world|mail -s "updates ready to install" administrator
    can solve. Especially with a whole flock of systems that have limited configuration options (without voiding warranty).
  39. Hey, at least... by theGreater · · Score: 1

    ...they appear to eat their own dogfood.

    -dhbarr.
  40. Sounds good on paper but... by barks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My Gentoo system is so out wack from time to time and something always needing to be re-compiled that I haven't gotten around to yet. If a system like mine is all over the map how can live Tech Support really help me? Sometimes I try to ask a question in IRC but even that becomes tricky.

    I'll admit I had jumped from Win-world to Gentoo and kind of learned on the fly. I imagine tech support will have to deal with moderate noobs like me at the start of the call. Like ask a few qualification questions first.

    "You don't know that [obscure command]? Read a book or two then please call back."

    1. Re:Sounds good on paper but... by wizkid · · Score: 1

      My experience with gentoo is way different. Building the system is always a pain, cause there's always the one emerge that fails. Once I get the system built, it's always rock solid. It's been much more stable then any fedora box I've owned. Every once in a while I get an errant just updated ebuild error, but even then, it's always been easier to fix then rpm based systems. Once I get a system built and stable though, it just runs and works.

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
    2. Re:Sounds good on paper but... by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      Except for etc-update.... I live in fear of etc-update.

    3. Re:Sounds good on paper but... by 21chrisp · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's one thing that really could improve.

    4. Re:Sounds good on paper but... by wizkid · · Score: 1


      Fear is the mind killer I will not fear etc-update

      lol

      When I see a config file that has to many changes, emacs, with buffer compare takes over!
      EMACS RULES -- VI DROOLS
      oh-oh, more editor wars!

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  41. two tips by c-reus · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are two tips I can give for anyone installing Gentoo:
    First, read the handbook. Following it step by step, one should not encounter any errors.
    Second, Gentoo forums is the best place to look if you do encounter any errors.

    No costs whatsoever (except time and the money you pay to your ISP)

  42. Free support here! by bcmm · · Score: 1

    So how does this differ from http://forums.gentoo.org/ and irc://irc.freenode.net/gentoo (I don't think /. wants me to linkify it...)?

    The difference with professional support is normally that they have to fix it because you pay them.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:Free support here! by Tester · · Score: 1
      So how does this differ from http://forums.gentoo.org/ and irc://irc.freenode.net/gentoo (I don't think /. wants me to linkify it...)?

      I think the difference is that you get an answer from a developer.. while on the Forum or on #gentoo @ freenode you will get an answer from a nobody.. because very few developers frequent them nowadays.. since there are way too many looser in there.

  43. free health care by popcornporncop · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    > free health care as well, cool;))

  44. Distcc by xaositects · · Score: 1

    They should offer up servers to help the world compile. Now *that's* support....

    1. Re:Distcc by ginotech · · Score: 1

      you know, there's a reason you have to compile it...

    2. Re:Distcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because we all have billion teraflops at hand?

      its no tthe compile scripts tat is the problem its time and machine power.

      hence his rference to distcc

  45. Gentoo Support is Pretty Good by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 1

    I run Gentoo on two systems (AMD64 and Pentium 4), and I've generally found technical support to be pretty good. I've used Red Hat and SuSE and Debian and Ubuntu and Knoppix, and found the tech support for those distros rather lacking. With Gentoo, I jump on IRC (irc.freenode.net) and usually have an answer within minutes. The #gentoo-amd64 channel is exceptionally helpful.

    Even with technical support, I wouldn't recommend Gentoo for a novice. My wife's machine runs Ubuntu, and I used Knoppix on my kids' boxes. Gentoo is great for someone like me who wants (needs?) to be on the bleeding edge, and who likes a single source for the latest "stuff."

    1. Re:Gentoo Support is Pretty Good by Codename_V · · Score: 1

      Gentoo is great for someone like me who wants (needs?) to be on the bleeding edge, and who likes a single source for the latest "stuff."

      Exactly! Like Gcc 4, Selinux, NPTL, GFS, native Java, and Xen. Err...nevermind, I was thinking of Fedora.

      --
      Free will is just an illusion
    2. Re:Gentoo Support is Pretty Good by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 1

      I run the ~amd64 test release, which is very current.

  46. "The first time is free" by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 2

    It's a proven business plan.

  47. 1st on the FAQ list by Ingolfke · · Score: 0, Troll

    How soon will it be before Gentoo follows BSD down the path to total oblivion?

    1. Re:1st on the FAQ list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? Not so. I think this was a rather neat ironic comment...you figure out the rest :)

  48. Sample Free Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tech Support: [recording] "Thank you for calling your free tech support service. While you are on hold, please enjoy informative messages from our sponsors." [15 minutes of ads] [person answers] "Thank you for calling, can I have your information please? Can I interest you in a subscription? Would you like to buy a product upgrade? I am sorry your free tech support time is up. Thank you for calling."

    I dont know anything about this company but this is what free tech support sounds like to me.

  49. wasn't this tried before? by jnf · · Score: 1

    remember the alamo LinuxCare?

    Didn't they go bankrupt? Seriously, I don't think gentoo is used enough in the business world to support this, but who knows I could be wrong.

    1. Re:wasn't this tried before? by jnf · · Score: 1

      hrm, it ate my around 'the alamo'

  50. Gentoo bought by Microsoft by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    I thought that Gentoo was purchased by Microsoft during the whole Daniel Robbins debacle.

    1. Re:Gentoo bought by Microsoft by piano-in-a-box · · Score: 0
      From your own link:

      Daniel Robbins now works for Microsoft and describes his position as "helping Microsoft to understand open source and community-based projects". Robbins managed to finalize the transfer of all Gentoo's intellectual property to the Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
    2. Re:Gentoo bought by Microsoft by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      No, actually you've cited text from the Wikipædia, a wicked parody of the source for all true knowledge, the Uncyclopedia. The Wikipædia was created by two Uncyclopedia vandals, Jimbo and un-Larry and should be disregarded . The Uncyclopedia was created by Oscar Wilde and inspired by Sophia. Hope that clears things up.

  51. udev, SATA support? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Howsabout making the genkernel --udev option standard now that devfs is totally deprecated?

    Also, the last time I tried emerging my home box, it appears that SATA drivers didn't get put in the initramfs. SUCK!!!

    1. Re:udev, SATA support? by genux_jcohen · · Score: 1

      the newer genkernel uses udev by default. SATA issues should also be fixed but if not file a bug report.

    2. Re:udev, SATA support? by woot+account · · Score: 1

      I have had nothing but problems with udev. When I tried to use it, it fails, and now on my friend's laptop, everytime he boots, he gets a message saying "/dev/sda2" is not a valid root device, and has to enter a shell. After typing in udevstart, exiting, and typing /dev/sda2, it will then boot. Sorry, but replacing something that works (nevermind it's deprecated) with something that doesn't? That just makes no sense.

    3. Re:udev, SATA support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like you are compiling your kernel. You have missed something in your "make menuconfig" You have to select your SATA chipset, and the SATA Support in the SCSI area. I had that same error for a while, I just kept sifting through the compile options until I found it and it worked.

  52. Time for unification by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    The Linux community should take in serious consideration the need for some kind of unification, a-la *BSD!
    More choices can yeld to a fragmentation of efforts over too many distributions differing mostly only in the package management and a bunch of software patches.
    A very specialised support company could have hard time when a distribution goes out of style
    .Or maybe not, because a Linux-related problem is (almost) the same on all distributions!
    E pluribus unum!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  53. Re:OSS piracy by wolf31o2 · · Score: 1

    Paying a developer to spend most of their time working for you on your proprietary back-end/astroturfing, lowering the volume of bugs that they resolve tenfold, is not "funded paying for Bugs in Gentoo for almost 8 months" at all.

  54. support-HA! by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    The problem with Linux support is there's too many developers. It's like 1 waiter taking orders and needs to work with 10 chefs in the kitchen.

    The only benefit Linux support will provide is to save you time, i.e. the time it takes to search all the places, etc... AND find that your problem is pretty unique and not currently solvable. How many times do you remember looking for linux solutions and finding mainly debates on how to implement things? What's also a problem is everyone is trying to use the latest open-source release for enterprise apps, not so stable IMO.

    99% of the time, the support/problem info you search for is either obsolete or not explained well enough. It would be best instead to have a screen capture error-search tool instead of person-to-person support. Google and Linux support (i..e searching for linux solutions) do not mix well with the informal nature of discussing and solving defects.

    ... (end rant).

  55. It's OK, they'll make up for it in volume. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Works every time! Or, is this more along the lines of the first-crack-hit-is-free model? Not trolling, here. Why does anyone think that free (as in beer) is ever real, when it comes to humans doing work for you? Something always has to give, and the price always has to be paid... so why do people persist in even using the word "free" in this context? It just rings false, and further distorts the use of that word.

    Better to say "no charge for two weeks" or "subsidized" if that's what they really mean - at least it's more realistic, and reduces the cancerous poison of economic magical thinking. At least, in coverage of it, it would keep everyone a little clearer on the subject, and help reduce the cognitive pollution just a tiny bit. I mean, isn't Gentoo for smart, thinking people? Why lead off with a headline that implies something that's just not - on the face of it - really true (or, not the whole picture)? I hate it when banks do it ("Free! But, Not Really[tm]"), and when everyone else does it, too. Oh well.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  56. I never call.. by Muppski · · Score: 1

    I tend to use (in this order):

    1. Google
    2. Gentoo forums
    3. Gentoo Wiki
    4. Gentoo IRC
    if I run into problems
    Yes ... you dont see RTFM anyways the only time i have to call for support for anything its for my ISP only to find out some dumbass cut a cable and I have to wait a day to get back online

  57. Gentoo Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is Gentoo and how is it better than Windows? Who actually USES it?

    1. Re:Gentoo Question by dpilot · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you really wanted an answer, I'd be tempted to give one. But then if you really wanted an answer, you could have just started at www.gentoo.org. So instead I'll assume this is an imitation-question, and give you an imitation-answer, as to who USEs it:

      USE=" acpi -bonobo bootsplash -eds emul-linux-x86 -esd exif -gnome -gtkhtml -guile -ipv6 java -kde lm_sensors nptl ppds threads

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Gentoo Question by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      your mom uses it...every night.

      ZING!

  58. Gentoo is a penguin by Old+Wolf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Something I noticed on the weekend while reading the newspaper -- there is a type of penguin called a Gentoo. Kind of fits in nicely with the Tux penguin theme. In fact these penguins were in the news because they lived on a minefield ..

  59. Don't leave us in suspense! by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What was your question?

    I'm not sure I've ever seen a question asked in a slashdot comment, when phrased as impossibly difficult, that someone didn't post the correct solution to within minutes.

    1. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Here's a couple!

      Is P equal to NP?
      Is there a way to factor a number in polynomial time?

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    2. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for your second question, I can factor the number 4 in polynomial time. Or did you mean an arbitrary number? I'll get back to you on that one.

    3. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      If you're that confident, I'll risk some karma for an answer to this imposible-to-fix-problem:

      How do I take my sound output from UT2004, mix it with my TeamSpeak output and port all that through my USB headset?

      I can mix all the above through my SB Audigy card, which supports hardware mixing, but AFAICT I can't do that with my USB headset for two reasons:

      1) USB headset doesn't support hardware mixing - cat /proc/asound/pcm indicates that my USB headset can only do 1 playback and 1 capture stream
      2) TeamSpeak seems to require direct access to the hardware. I've had no luck in getting it to work without.

      I'll trade an ode of praise and positive comment mods for a working solution. And yeah, I've googled for it. And learned a hell of a lot about /dev/dsp, /dev/sound/dsp, symlinking them to each other, dmix and other, forgotten stuff in the process of failing to fix this problem.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      And yes, I can get TS working with the USB headset just fine. The problem is that TS takes complete control of the hardware, and nothing else can access it. .asoundrc and dmix stuff doesn't seem to work because of the hardware access problem.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    5. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by pantherace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The answer:
      Setup KDE's arts to output to your headset, then:
      artsdsp -m teamspeak
      artsdsp -m ut2004

      Which will give both teamspeak and ut2004 emulated memory-mapped (mostly what people mean when they say hardware controlled) sound output. It does consume a small bit of CPU, but today sound mixing is not that big a deal.

      I also believe that the above could probably be done by other software mixers, possibly esd, but I don't know how to set them up off the top of my head.

      Hope this helps.

    6. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I had tried this sort of setup once before, but what killed me then and now was knowing how/where to force KDE arts output to the USB headset. It's on /dev/dsp1 and is hw:1,0, but do I force this (no option to choose it) via the control panel Sound System menu, somewhere in the aRts control tool via some option in the Audio Manager or Environment menus? Or am I missing a vital config file or arts utility?

      And thanks for your timely reply. I've tried just about everything BUT aRts so far, mainly due to the fact that all the info I could dig up said "aRts sucks" use dmix, etc.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    7. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried JACK? AFAIK it's designed for just your problem.

    8. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by pantherace · · Score: 1

      KDE's Control Panel->Sound & Multimedia->Sound System

      The Hardware Tab, and (as I've got only a single active card) I think it may let you select it from the drop down menu, however, if it does not, "Override Device Location" should allow you to specify it.

      There are a lot of people who don't like arts. It has some problems, but it's a useful tool. IMHO, because it will take over the sound output, doesn't make it arts fault that too many sound devices don't allow multiple sound streams, and artsdsp actually solves the underlying problem. Though most dismiss arts rather than learn about it. (IMHO, dmix is useless.)

    9. Re:Don't leave us in suspense! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Once I figured out that "Overide Device Location" required the actual hardware device (hw:1,0) I was able to get arts to successfully point there. Test sounds and media worked fine, at which point I swapped to my main applications. Which left me with only two problems:

      1) Even launched via artsdsp -m, TeamSpeak still locks the channel, and no sounds can be pushed to the headset until TS is closed.
      2) UT2k4 is built on OSS, and unless I screwed something else up on my system, I can't get it to push any sound out at all (USB or reg speakers) when launching it via artsdsp -m.

      To be sure, I re-checked my permissions and tested stuff, and it seems that all is well in audio land for me, outside the USB audio problems. Not to be a total arse, but were you giving "this works for me" advice or "this should work" advice? Because I haven't found anyone who's gotten this to work yet, as much as it seems it should.

      If you have any more ideas, I'd like to hear them. And thanks for playing so far. ;)

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  60. I could overload them with too many questions by Theovon · · Score: 1

    There are gobs of things I've never gotten to work with Gentoo, like Hotplug. There are other things that break regularly, like audio, which will go away mysteriously and not work again until I reboot.

    My biggest problem with Gentoo isn't a tech support one. It's a big giant bug called "etc-update" that bombards me with over 100 "changes" to config files I've never heard of every time I upgrade a bunch of things.

    I've paid my dues. I've compiled kernels and admin'ed my own box. I think, rather than try to fix this annoying thing called Gentoo, I'm going to just switch to Ubuntu.

    Yes, it's flamebait. But seriously, there are certain things about Gentoo that I don't want to give up, but there are other problems that remain that have never been fixed that are driving me away. To each his own, I guess.

    1. Re:I could overload them with too many questions by Muppski · · Score: 0, Redundant

      All dist got pros and cons But one of my problems in gentoo are not "etc-update" You dont have to run that you know >_>

    2. Re:I could overload them with too many questions by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem with Gentoo isn't a tech support one. It's a big giant bug called "etc-update" that bombards me with over 100 "changes" to config files I've never heard of every time I upgrade a bunch of things.

      Yes, it's flamebait.


      Sure. And an outdated one.
      use dispatch-conf, not etc-update.

    3. Re:I could overload them with too many questions by Theovon · · Score: 1

      dispatch-conf is not something mentioned in standard documentation. And when you update packages, it tells you to run etc-update. As long as it's telling you to run etc-update, my comment isn't outdated.

    4. Re:I could overload them with too many questions by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      dispatch-conf is not something mentioned in standard documentation.
      http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/2005.1/handb ook-x86.xml?full=1#book_part3_chap4
      It is documented - in the handbook right next to etc-update - thats pretty much as standard as it can get.

      As long as it's telling you to run etc-update, my comment isn't outdated.
      Are you also still using nano, because it is the editor used in the documentation?

  61. Gentoo users moms by TwoManAdv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for an ISP tech support and I actually had a Gentoo user call in one time because she had no idea why she couldn't get online. My job doesn't actually allow me to troubleshoot Linux but this customer was upset because she didn't know anything about linux, so I helped her get back online. Turned out it was a Gentoo users mom who didn't want linux but her son insisted on it because he hates microsoft. This makes me wonder how many of these people calling into their tech support are gonna Linux fan boys mothers.

    1. Re:Gentoo users moms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you managed to get her back online. You forgot to mention what the problem was.

      As a Linux fan boy who's given my mom a Linux box (to temporarily replace it until my MS fanboy brother got around to fixing her Windows box) I will say that her box worked perfectly until my other brother got around to re-installing Windows.

      Now it's all fscked up again. If I have to service it (or anyone else's PC) *ever* I'll only do so if I can install Linux because I just can't be bothered to deal with all the hassles of installing and fixing Windows (hours of installation, the ever-fun game of "find-the-key" (which usually turns into "forge-the-key" because none of these people know where that stuff is), wander through a million vendor sites looking for a half dozen drivers followed by a few quality hours with Windows Update, repeat for each application...sheer joy that can only be matched by staking oneself over a bamboo shoot on a sunny day).

      Windows installed...sytem fscked in two weeks.
      Linux installed...ran perfectly until...
      Windows installed...fscked in two weeks.

      From the standpoint of a guy who doesn't live to service other people's systems, the choice seems pretty clear cut to me.

      OT: were you the same ISP support guy who was telling me three years ago that SOHO routers were not supported and that they just caused problems?

    2. Re:Gentoo users moms by TwoManAdv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Her only problem was that the dhcp client wasn't being run on boot so I just simply had her run "dhcpcd eth0" and she was online. I didn't bother updating the runlevel to start it up everytime because had someone been listening in on the call at this point I could still claim that I hadn't made any permanent changes to the os. Apparently her son was usually able to help her using an ssh connection but since she didn't have internet at all and he lives far away he didn't have the patience to troubleshoot with her over the phone. I told her to leave the comp on so that the internet connection remains active and he could then login and finish up the job. I totally understand what your saying about once linux is running it stays running and once windows is running anything can happen but I wouldn't install linux on anyones computers because then everytime they have a problem there gonna call me and I deal with that at work everyday. BTW we don't support any routers. We'll reset it with you on the phone but if it doesn't pick up an IP address we're reffering you to the manufacturer.

    3. Re:Gentoo users moms by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      My job doesn't actually allow me to troubleshoot Linux but this customer was upset because she didn't know anything about linux, so I helped her get back online.

      Whereas if it had been running Windows she would surely have fixed the problem herself.

      I see two possibilities here. The first is that you really do work in an ISP's support department, are both knowledgable and experienced, and go out of your way to bend the rules and help people.

      The second is you're just trolling.

      Obviously, the first possibility is overwhelmingly likely to be correct and we can surely discount the second.

  62. Re:OSS piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey wolf... Do you who appart from deedra works for Gen-ux. I admit that I'm pretty curious

    (disclaimer.. I read -core too... )

  63. Am I actually Brave enough? by GecKo213 · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if I'll be brave enough to destroy the FC4 distro on my laptop for Gentoo! I think i will! I think I can muster up enough courage to get through an install if I have someone there with me to get it up and running! Oh Happy Day! Gentoo here I come!

    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
  64. Cool maybe I can get Coda up and running now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do they have any Coda experts online ;-) That would be uber-cool.

    If nothing else, it is nice to have more than one set of eyes

  65. Metadata updates in Gentoo by shadow255 · · Score: 1
    I use dispatch-conf, and I prefer it to etc-update, but I think you're possibly missing the point in your reply. The unfortunate truth is that there are a lot of configuration files to handle, including init scripts, which change significantly at a rapid pace. Even using dispatch-conf, I still find myself wondering why I'm being asked to review files which I would never modify unless I had intimate working knowledge of the service being run.

    This should not be dismissed without admitting that there may be a better way for the metadata updates to be handled.

    --

    Logic is a wonderful thing but doesn't always beat actual thought. -Terry Pratchett

    1. Re:Metadata updates in Gentoo by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      The unfortunate truth is that there are a lot of configuration files to handle, including init scripts, which change significantly at a rapid pace. Even using dispatch-conf, I still find myself wondering why I'm being asked to review files which I would never modify unless I had intimate working knowledge of the service being run.

      Propably because you still use the very conservative default empty CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. see "emerge --help config" and the make.conf manpage. Putting /etc/init.d into you CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK would have prevented many manual config updates.

    2. Re:Metadata updates in Gentoo by shadow255 · · Score: 1
      Propably because you still use the very conservative default empty CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. see "emerge --help config" and the make.conf manpage. Putting /etc/init.d into you CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK would have prevented many manual config updates.

      Thanks for the tip. Now just how many ordinary users will go to the lengths to use this way of reducing the unnecessary notifications?

      In addition, this is somewhat of a coarse way to deal with the issue. Ideally, a user-modified init script should be the trigger for configuration change notices rather than a big on/off switch for the entire /etc/init.d directory.

      I realize that's much more difficult to implement, but it might prevent stuff-ups where the user follows this recommendation for CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, later on uses a forum how-to that recommends modifying one of the init scripts and then emerges world and fails to get a needed security tweak for the package.

      --

      Logic is a wonderful thing but doesn't always beat actual thought. -Terry Pratchett

    3. Re:Metadata updates in Gentoo by Sweetshark · · Score: 1
      I realize that's much more difficult to implement, but it might prevent stuff-ups where the user follows this recommendation for CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, later on uses a forum how-to that recommends modifying one of the init scripts and then emerges world and fails to get a needed security tweak for the package.

      CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK will make portage automatically overwrite the files. So he wont miss a security tweak, but his manual change.
      As for "still to manual" set
      replace-unmodified=yes
      in /etc/dispatch-conf.conf and once a file is known, you dont need any manual confirms for files not modified by the user.
    4. Re:Metadata updates in Gentoo by shadow255 · · Score: 1
      Why didn't you point this out in the first place? ;-) CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK is a terrible thing to change for someone like me who may modify some init scripts while leaving most as they come with the package. Thank you for this information.

      Now the question that remains for me is, given that this is the behavior for dispatch-conf that would probably be of most benefit to ordinary users, why is the default for replace-unmodified not already yes? I think we're still seeing where Gentoo can improve.

      --

      Logic is a wonderful thing but doesn't always beat actual thought. -Terry Pratchett

    5. Re:Metadata updates in Gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the question that remains for me is, given that this is the behavior for dispatch-conf that would probably be of most benefit to ordinary users, why is the default for replace-unmodified not already yes?

      Im not sure, but it might be that this only works with RCS (which is a optional dependency of dispatch-conf). And gentoo always tries to be as lean as possible in the default. But Im guessing there.

    6. Re:Metadata updates in Gentoo by shadow255 · · Score: 1
      Im not sure, but it might be that this only works with RCS (which is a optional dependency of dispatch-conf). And gentoo always tries to be as lean as possible in the default. But Im guessing there.

      Just so that anyone bothering to read this deeply into the thread doesn't go away with misinformation, dispatch-conf is provided by sys-apps/portage. As one might hope, this vital package has no dependency for rcs.

      --

      Logic is a wonderful thing but doesn't always beat actual thought. -Terry Pratchett

    7. Re:Metadata updates in Gentoo by shadow255 · · Score: 1

      And to clarify my clarification, it is possible that parent poster made the comment based on reading /etc/dispatch-conf.conf, which contains a variable named "use-rcs" which defaults to no. It is quite possible that this must be switched to yes before it is possible for dispatch-conf to employ the "replace-unmodified" option, but that is not documented anywhere that I have looked.

      --

      Logic is a wonderful thing but doesn't always beat actual thought. -Terry Pratchett

  66. etc-update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Etc-update is definitely a good thing. Often when a package is updated there is a new version of the default configuration file. What do they do? If they replace my file with it, they killed my configuration. Unacceptable. If they don't replace it, they potentially leave a deprecated, broken, or insecure configuration file that I've never heard of on my system. Also unacceptable. The only solution is to let me scan the differences and see what I want to change and what I don't. If it is trying to override something I don't understand, I let it. If I know what the change means and I want the old one, I keep the old one. That's how it works.

    1. Re:etc-update by Theovon · · Score: 1

      The proper solution is to automatically notice that I'm using defaults and figure out when replacing the file is correct. Or if I've made changes, figure out how to port them from one version to the next (like Ubuntu does with pre/post-install scripts), and only as a last resort should it ask me to manually look at the files.

      In my case, I would never have to look at a config file again if they did it right.

  67. Support is for people who can't google/read forum' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get all the information you need by what is currently available (documentation, forums, irc) but if you want an authoritive answers and don't have the time to check, Tech Support is a good option.

  68. hair-brained scheme #2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall a year ago GenUX was claiming to offer precompiled binary packages for your specific platform/use flags/etc.

  69. Re:OSS piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought he was refering to the top most post.

  70. Re:OSS piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    leonardop, hparker (submitter of this article), dmwaters (pr author), astinus is the list I've seen.

  71. Interesting... by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    The software is free, the support is free...Is there any element here which people are supposed to pay for?

    Oh, wait...I forgot. Earning money is considered evil around here, unless it's done from within a cubicle. My bad.

    Honestly, anyone who thinks Communism is dead needs only to spend two weeks on Slashdot. They'll quickly be shown just how mistaken they are. Methinks Senator McCarthy was alive 50 years too early.

    1. Re:Interesting... by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      The software is free, the support is free...Is there any element here which people are supposed to pay for?

      http://www.gen-ux.com/catalog

  72. online support sucks by marcell · · Score: 1

    i registered two days ago and tried online chat support... two times for several hours it just said: "there is a one person in queue before you. please wait.." or something like that.. it refreshed itself every half a minute but no luck.. that person was chatting for ages ;) pitty...