Slashdot Mirror


180 Solutions Cuts Back on Spyware Installs

An anonymous reader writes "Washingtonpost.com is reporting that adware purveyor 180Solutions has finally decided to stop letting third-party companies install their programs for commission without 180's approval. The story says 180 announced the move after pressure from public interest groups who threatened to file a formal complaint with regulators at the Federal Trade Commission."

158 comments

  1. Please by temojen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    File anyways.

    1. Re:Please by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Agreed. All this says is "it's okay to bundle spyware, if you stop just before you're sued." It's like police giving coke dealers a warning. Anyone can be a coke dealer, as long as they stop once they get that warning.

    2. Re:Please by Red+Alastor · · Score: 2, Funny
      And we are not even slashdotting them !

      http://www.180solutions.com/

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    3. Re:Please by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      i like how theo homepage specifically says "no spyware"

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    4. Re:Please by zoogies · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And threaten to file more often. How many spyware perpetrators would quail before the sight of lawyers? Lawyers! They have a purpose in life now, and it's a good one.

    5. Re:Please by yurnotsoeviltwin · · Score: 4, Informative

      well technically, they don't provide spyware. They provide adware. There's a difference, not that anyone really cares. They both suck just as bad too me.

    6. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      absolutely. Macho posturing and threats aren't ultimately going to stop anything. Actions speak louder than words.

    7. Re:Please by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      If we can get all the lawyers going after the spammers, and then get all the spammers to spam the lawyers. Perhaps they would get caught in an infinite loop, and the rest of us could get on with our lives!

    8. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those two are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they can overlap to a large degree : Adware can (partially) *be* Spyware.

  2. Oblig. by AAeyers · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. This time it makes sense!

    --
    "For Great Justice."
  3. Good. by TehNSA · · Score: 1

    The closer we get to a spyware-free world, the better.

  4. Somehow I doubt getting approval will be very hard by Clockwurk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What good is peddling scumware if you can't get ppl to bundle it?

  5. That's OK by temojen · · Score: 1

    It'll be bundled with CHM exploits and ActiveX controls.

  6. Better Ideas by Scoria · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interestingly, I've noticed that spyware developers only tend to change once they've developed a "better" idea, and rumor has it that a couple of original equipment manufacturers are now installing MyWebSearch by default.

    Could it be that some spyware manufacturers are taking the good press while they can, knowing that their current method of installation won't really last? Could they be looking to bypass end-user installation altogether?

    --
    Do you like German cars?
    1. Re:Better Ideas by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Most of these guys already do bypass end-user installation by performing automatic installation via exploits, piggybacking on other apps, and deceiving install prompts.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    2. Re:Better Ideas by loxfinger · · Score: 1

      ... and rumor has it that a couple of original equipment manufacturers are now installing MyWebSearch by default. Any idea which OEM's pre-install malware?

    3. Re:Better Ideas by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I can think of one...

      HP.

      Take an HP out of the box.

      Install your anti-spyware app of choice - preferably the AdAware/Spybot one-two punch.

      Run the scan.

      Be amazed that there's something there.

    4. Re:Better Ideas by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      It's either Sony or Gateway, but one of the two puts WeatherBug on new installs. Gateway inclueds WildTangent games... etc.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    5. Re:Better Ideas by Cylix · · Score: 3, Informative

      While it's too late now.

      I'm fairly certain that low end Dell's now ship with it. They have a lot of stuff installed... even Office trial that can be purchased. I'm not sure, but I think WP was the full version, but only included on CD.

      So yeah, that might explain the price break on the new equipment and boy does it slow them down. So of course I wipe and reinstall... then create an image disk for all of the systems.

      Unfortunately, I can't go back and confirm it on the dozen new systems, because they no longer have the factory install.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Better Ideas by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I discovered Fark.com linking to a story with a Myway.com address, and I almost banned that site from my bookmarks. There's no good reason for anyone to install MyWebSearch or any of the CoolWebSearch scamware.

      It make my blood boil that they aren't treated like the virus writers that they are.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    7. Re:Better Ideas by bcat24 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not just on low end Dells. I have a fairly new Dell XPS Gen 5 that came with a lot of preinstalled junk, including some borderline spyware.

    8. Re:Better Ideas by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Most of us run firefox with enough anti-bad plugins that we don't even notice. Not trying to sound elitist, but when the submitter, admin, and everyone commenting doesnt run an exploitable platform, how are they supposed to know what its trying to do? Most of those things are subvert enough that with the right useragent they won't even send you the install code.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    9. Re:Better Ideas by andrewski · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Yes, HP computers are literally loaded chock full of spyware from the factory.

    10. Re:Better Ideas by The+NPS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why did this get a -1? It's definitely true. Dell is doing it too, these days. Compaq, HP and Dell (and probably others) all have mild spyware bundled with them from the factory. HP's recovery partition means than when you reformat, you're putting all that junk back on there. I heard dell swithed from sending out disks with their computers to using a recovery partition as well. Terrible.

    11. Re:Better Ideas by grubbymitts · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have an HP (twe months old), I can't say that it is full of spyware. Yes it has Realplayer on there and it did have a dial home for the ATI graphics board, but nothing else. Realplayer is deactivated until use and one click with Hijackthis removed the dial home crap. It's mostly full of useless shite that you probably will never use like iTunes and PCHelp. Besides, a good firewall like Kerio (fantastic) will always tell you if something is trying to dial home or even playing about within your system. And use Firefox or an IE based browser that doesn't allow BHOs like Deepnet and most things that find their way on your pc should have little or no effect. IMHO spybot finds things that half the time ain't there. Adaware is the better of the two. 180 solutions should burn in hell. I remember getting their shit back in my win98 days.

    12. Re:Better Ideas by Vexar · · Score: 1
      I nearly went up in smoke trying to get 180 solutions off my workstation once. The guys in Enterprise Security said I was being silly and they just rebuilt the boxes when they would find 180 solutions. I think I was pushing 2.5 hours to fully remove it, but then I'm not seasoned at removing truly innovative "gray" ware.

      Wholeheartedly, I agree. Any attempt to seem like they are do-gooders is thinly veiled. This guy probably does PR for hate groups, to supplement his income.

  7. Or, summarized: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Parasite on the system of capitalism to become marginally less unethical"

  8. They Should be in Jail by PingXao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So they get to continue pushing their crap and the only difference is that the CSO - Chief Sleaze Officer - must personally approve every payload turd. Fantastic. They need to be shut down, not threatened with a slap on the wrist.

  9. Bad for digiticians! by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey, I'm as glad as the next guy to kick spyware writers in the teeth, but we the slashdot readers are a group most densely than any other made up of people who are paid good cash money (sometimes sex!) to clean this crap out of people's computers. Just as Microsoft is capitalizing like a mafia on protection from viruses for money, a market created from writing crappy operating systems, we the slashdot lobby should push for "free speech" rights of the malware industry.

    1. Re:Bad for digiticians! by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Funny
      but we the slashdot readers are a group most densely than any other made up of people who are paid good cash money (sometimes sex!) to clean this crap out of people's computers.
      Fixing computers for sex! Where the hell are you fixing computers? A porno set?
    2. Re:Bad for digiticians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Fixing computers for sex! Where the hell are you fixing computers? A porno set?

      No, his sister's house, silly.

    3. Re:Bad for digiticians! by Supurcell · · Score: 5, Funny
      Fixing computers for sex! Where the hell are you fixing computers? A porno set?
      "I got a call that someone had a problem with their computer."
      "I called. I don't think this big, floppy disk will fit in my tiny drive."
      "Don't worry, I'll make it fit. Looks like you have some backdoors on here too."
    4. Re:Bad for digiticians! by temojen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and all those doctors should stop doing Vaccinations since it cuts into their bottom line.

    5. Re:Bad for digiticians! by Aenema · · Score: 1

      We can get paid in sex???

    6. Re:Bad for digiticians! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Digitician? Another horrible portmanteau? No thanks!

    7. Re:Bad for digiticians! by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      "Looks like you have some backdoors on here too."

      "Stand still, there's a trojan in your back orifice" (1)


      (1) Overheard at a Gateway call center (minus the "Stand still" part) when a tech was trying to explain to a customer why their machine was acting erratic.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    8. Re:Bad for digiticians! by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'd start being concerned about that if it was a similar issue -- If a lot of people who know goddamn well that they have an infection to spread, are going around spreading it as much as possible, then you can pose that speculation about the doctors. Until then, it doesn't mean shit in this discussion.

    9. Re:Bad for digiticians! by HerbieStone · · Score: 1
      "I called. I don't think this big, floppy disk will fit in my tiny drive"

      Now with herbal viagra. Make your Floppy a Hard-Drive. Order Today!

    10. Re:Bad for digiticians! by nyri · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I got a call that someone had a problem with their computer."
      "I called. I don't think this big, floppy disk will fit in my tiny drive."
      "Don't worry, I'll make it fit. Looks like you have some backdoors on here too."


      I just reached new level of being a nerd. I got a hard-on because of someone writing naughy messages about computers in slashdot.

    11. Re:Bad for digiticians! by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I just reached new level of being a nerd. I got a hard-on because of someone writing naughy messages about computers in slashdot.

      And you're willing to admit that?

      Make that two new levels of nerd ... one for the woodie, one for telling us about it.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  10. Why threaten anything? by Evro · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The story says 180 announced the move after pressure from public interest groups who threatened to file a formal complaint with regulators at the Federal Trade Commission."


    Why bother threatening anything? Why not just file the complaint?
    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Why threaten anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why bother threatening anything? Why not just file the complaint?

      ...asks he of infinite resources.

    2. Re:Why threaten anything? by LePrince · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Because when getting in front of the judge, you can say that you did everything you could outside of the courtroom to prevent this to getting to a courtoom, and failed because the other company refused to comply.

      Otherwise you might end up in court, screaming, then when the defending party comes in, they will say "Oh, that's why I'm here ? Well, yeah, sure, why not, I don't mind, I'll do it". Then you look like a complete asshat who didn't want to resort to something OTHER than the court...

      One of my friend is sueing someone for fraud (2000$) and as the policeman said, "Do everything you can (legally of course) to recover the cash. If talking doesn't work, THEN we'll file in a legal criminal complaint and it'll go to court. Because if you go to court and she simply agrees to pay, you look like the dumbass.

    3. Re:Why threaten anything? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Becasue contrary to what the screaming hordes know as the media want you to think, the court is actually the last place to resolve difficulties. Most people perfer to give the person a chance to rectify the issue.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Why threaten anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I want something done, I don't care if I look like an ass or someone who is wasting time if I know I can do something that is guaranteed to get the results done, especially in the case of some form of injustice.

    5. Re:Why threaten anything? by Evro · · Score: 1

      But the complaint would be based on bad acts the offending party has already been doing for years. Even if they stop now, a great deal of damage has already been done to a great many computers. While I see your point, the damage has been done. If someone's stealing money from you, you don't not report it just because they stop stealing, unless maybe they give back everything they stole.

      --
      rooooar
  11. Too little... by redheaded_stepchild · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...so horribly, horribly late. Do these impotent bastards actually think this is going to make people *want* to use their software, or are they just trying for some positive PR spin? I can think of a lot of other ways clients have gotten 180Solutions' junk on their machines, and IST was only the most voracious. Let's not forget this has been going on for a few years now, too. Did they never see ISTbar installed on their own machines? That would be kinda funny, now that I think on it.

    --
    Don't use the Troll mod just because you disagree with me.
    1. Re:Too little... by rholliday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It can work. Remember that we're dealing with the general public here. We as technicians know spyware companies' names by heart because we deal with them hand's-on. The end user just knows "it was slow and had popups" and we subsequently "fixed it."

      Example: eAnthology/eAcceleration/Stop Sign, etc. I remember removing tons of their spyware apps. Now they advertise on national television for their Anti-Virus packages, claiming to "make it faster than the day you got it." Did they clean up their act? I have no idea, frankly. But I know people are buying it.

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    2. Re:Too little... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      The end user just knows "it was slow and had popups" and we subsequently "fixed it."
      Indeed, speaking primarily as an end-user, as opposed to a programmer (because I haven't done a lot of it recently), I'm inclined to say that a lot of end-users have a hard time realizing that there is actually someone who is a "legitimate" company doing this to them. It is theoretically possible that someone would see 180Solutions as actively fighting spyware/adware, as opposed to simply being more passive in its support/condoning of adware.

    3. Re:Too little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "faster than the day you got it" claim could be true now that Dell and other computer makers are putting all sorts of spyware crap on their systems but they were probably making that claim when computers came without all the crap they do now so I still wouldn't trust them.

  12. This is slashdot worthy? by zegebbers · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    An advertiser decides to choose who to distribute their ads through! The cut back looks like it would be minimal. All they're doing is requiring that third parties get permission! There's a million more companies our there that will pay to have their spyware installed using dodgy techniques.

  13. Let this company die by bhav2007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comanies like this make my blood boil. I am planning to be a CS major in college, and I just can't understand how anyone could willingly work to make this kind of product. Have they actually fooled themselves into believing that one of their toolbars is helping people? I couldn't. It flattens me that someone could go on working to create something which is completely useless and harmful. I can only conclude that whoever is working at these companies must either be starvingly desperate for work or just hateful. Maybe that is where bad programmers go when they die. "Welcome to hell, now you will be forced to create spyware for all of eternity! Mwahahahahaha!". Also, why exactly should we care if this company is "turning around"? There are plenty of struggling software companies which haven't infected anyone. It seems pretty much impossible that one of these establishments could ever produce something useful. Do programmers have any kind of vigilante justice? ;)

    1. Re:Let this company die by heelios · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do raise a point there, I always wondered how spyware *companies* were hiring people to write their crap.

      The most obvious possiblity, I believe, is that they pay script-kiddies or teenagers to write their crap.

    2. Re:Let this company die by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      It's not spyware, it's a feature... saids the company hiring the CS major.

    3. Re:Let this company die by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Sing it with me: "Money makes the world go round."

    4. Re:Let this company die by cybergrunt69 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Have they actually fooled themselves into believing that one of their toolbars is helping people?

      Um, nope! Do spammers really think that the V14GR@ ads are going to appeal to someone? NOPE! There is one reason that they let this type of stuff happen - money

      Most the the spyware crap that's installed has an almost interesting feature, but it's main purpose is to gather information. The most ethical of these just wants to see what websites you visit as well as a number of other metrics; less ethical will change system settings (home pages, etc) and possibly collect personal info and keystrokes. All of this info is sent 'home' so they can use the info in their advertising, or sell the info to advertising peoples.

      It's not about helping people, it's about gathering info from the masses, and using it to make a buck.

      OK boys and girls, make sure your tinfoil hats are on tight. The next step is where they partner with Microsoft, AdAware, and SpyBot. Once they've said they don't bundle spyware, they will fight to get on the automatic exclusion lists, thus not having their data deleted. They won't really stop all spyware installations, they'll just have fewer higher-paying spyware inclusions...

      --
      --- "To ignore race and sex is racist and sexist!" -- Jesse Jackson
    5. Re:Let this company die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they pay pretty senior people, and pay them well. They I was offered employment once... although at the time I had no idea what kind of product it was (it was peddled to me as just another internet search utility). It was a very vigorous interview with more than the usual technical screening. The money they were offering was very good. Their CEO struck me as a bit sleazy, but then again, CEO's are many times used car salesmen with a higher salary. All in all, on the back end they were a very professional development team paying slightly higher than average Redmond, Washinton salaries for very senior people. They were a small team though, only a few devs.

    6. Re:Let this company die by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

      it comes down to the person in the end.

      in my line of work, mixed media, i wont work or take on any projects relating to ciggerets, because, well they are there to kill people, even with a large amount of cash they are waving in my face and when times get hard i have to ask myself "can i eat this week? what work do i have lined up".

      I know plenty of people that wouldn't miss a nights sleep working for them and taking their money and designing for them. probably the same for this company.

      I've even refused offers because one off the companies clients was dunhill.

      how many of you slashdotters smoke?

    7. Re:Let this company die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait till you get out of college lala land and mommy and daddy aint paying them bills no more little kiddie.

    8. Re:Let this company die by The+Queen · · Score: 1

      I just can't understand how anyone could willingly work to make this kind of product. Have they actually fooled themselves into believing that one of their toolbars is helping people?

      Alas, even your job, somewhere down the line, is probably hurting someone or something. Very few paying jobs are innocent. Bombs don't build themselves, nor do animals inflict laboratory tests on themselves. It's all about what you, personally, will lower yourself to do for money, and there is no bottom.

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    9. Re:Let this company die by sco08y · · Score: 1

      I was planning to moderate, but then I saw that someone modded this post "Insightful." It seems pretty much impossible that a nerfherder like this could post something insightful. But I'm worried... Is stupidity contagious?

    10. Re:Let this company die by bhav2007 · · Score: 1

      Well at least you still managed to find a way to be jackass

  14. re: free speech for malware authors? by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a crappy attitude! You're comment makes you look like an embarassment to I.T. I do get paid good money to clean up spyware/malware problems as part of my job. I do on-site PC service and consulting for a living. But like I tell lots of customers, I'd *much* rather being doing something else for my money. Frankly, it's boring, and sometimes even tedious work. Here you are, on the clock, waiting for several scanners to go through every single file and folder on their hard drives - and in some cases, doing a bunch of manual registry editing and searching too. Hours can easily go by, especially when the customer has a slower computer, and you're just praying the machine doesn't decide to freeze up in the middle of one of these scans, or else you've got to start it over from the beginning again! Meanwhile, you're starting to wonder how you're going to justify billing the person for all this time that's going by - when charging your normal hourly rate is starting to mean charging more than their system is even worth!

    Just as I have no desire to join the mafia and extort money from people, I don't enjoy billing high rates to customers who were victimized by malware when all they're trying to do is struggle by on their 5 or 6 year old PC, reading their email and typing up papers.

    In fact, I've often ended up trying to "do the right thing" and only charging them a more reasonable price, which meant I got seriously short-changed for my time spent. But I guess I just can't stomach the idea of taking some retired lady's entire pension for the month just because some asshat like 180 Solutions tossed their crap-ware on her computer when she thought she was just downloading a pretty waterfall screen saver or something.

  15. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're comment makes you look like an embarassment...

    Your comment makes you look like an embarassment...

    Once again, the captcha has chosen ironically: "literacy"

  16. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your comment makes you look like an embarassment...

    Your comment makes you look like an embarrassment...

    Looks like you didn't take the whole "literacy" thing too seriously.

  17. My Portfolio! by dogbreathcanada · · Score: 2, Funny

    What?!? Now my 180Solutions stock will be worthless.

  18. Re: free speech for malware authors? by RM6f9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Try a KVM switch - thanks to them, it's entirely possible to be cleaning 8 computers at a time - charge each owner 1 hour's labor, lather, rinse, repeat as necessary. Housecalls extra, of course, but with the right scheduling, you can stay as busy as you want, and not feel as much guilt over your charges.

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  19. Spyware vs. Adware by NcF · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, lets get one thing straight.
    Spyware = Gets information from your computer that you would not want some random schmuck knowing.
    Adware = Shows an advertisement.
    Malware = Does bad things to your system/configuration.

    This article has successfully misused the term spyware once again. Just because adware often contains spyware, or acts as a gateway and downloads/installs spyware on yoru machine, does not make the adware itself spyware.

    If you are going to use the terms, please use them correctly.

    From the article: ad-serving software (labeled by some as "spyware")

    1. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by entrigant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just call them all Malware. That seems pretty accurate to me. I don't care if it only shows ads if it installed itself as a damn driver or hooked the kernel it "Does bad things to your system/configuration."

    2. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by NcF · · Score: 1

      Sorry, with the definitions I was trying to keep it simple as I know that /. doesn't always have the most intelligent of posters. I'll be the first to agree with you on the calling everything malware, as it does damage stuff, including taking away from your time with those stupid pop-up ads.

    3. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It all used to be "spyware" until the Mebibyte crowd decided to go anal and now we can't just call it spyware. I'd start calling it crudware but I'm afraid I'll be picked up on it because the constant leaking of information is done by "diarrheaware" while the irregular information loss is "constipatedware".

      So I just call it spyware and leave the semantic nazis to waste their breath.

    4. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by strider44 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that the article is trying to say that its purpose is primarily to serve ads (ad-serving software), but it also gets information from the computer so many people label it spyware. I don't see why adware can't also be called spyware if the name also fits.

    5. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by drpimp · · Score: 0

      Your definitions are all correct.

      Maybe they should all be super labeled LAMEWARE. Because that is what they really are. These companies are making money off other peoples ignorances and lack of knowledge by installing this wow maybe better labeled CRAPWARE. Not to mention all the time spent by these people fixing these 180 solution... oh yet another better name 180 pollutions.

      Hmm... maybe someone in the slashdot community would be kind enough to reverse engineer the 180 pollutions apps, and insert code, redistribute them only to DDos 180 pollutions networks. Make their own apps bite them in the ass. RAHRRRRR

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    6. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      I think slowing your computer down so much that it takes 5 minutes to open your web browser constitutes "Does bad things to your system/configuration"

      Like the sibling post says, they're all malware.

      --
      I got nothin'
    7. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      Thank you, yes it's all Malware and the creators should all be tied to trees upside down and fed exlax for a month. Then they will be covered in what they are trying to dump on us.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    8. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by m50d · · Score: 1
      From the article: ad-serving software (labeled by some as "spyware")

      Erm, that's entirely accurate. Lots of people call anything of the sort spyware, even if all it does is display ads. That's linguistic shift for you.

      --
      I am trolling
  20. 180 Solutions by Belldoor · · Score: 1


    Are we talking here about the same 180 solutions that would never install spyware using the holes of internet explorer?

    --
    Superb hosting 4800MB Storage, 120GB bandwidth, ssh, $7.95
    1. Re:180 Solutions by nicobn · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. WHO wants those annoying toolbars anyway ?

    2. Re:180 Solutions by FLEB · · Score: 1

      I'm going to guess "companies that profit by giving ad-impression numbers achieved by hijacking browsers to show ads".

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  21. I knew a guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...who works for 180solutions. Well, I didn't really know him until I flamed him on full-disclosure for working for 180solutions, but that's beside the point. This guy was totally for 180solutions! I could hardly believe my ears... er.. eyes! I reminded him of the incident where 180solutions was using browser flaws to install adware on victims' machines, yet he had "no recollection of any such event" (even though it was all over the internet and widely discussed on security mailing lists). The nerve of some individuals... Some people just deserve to be shot.

    1. Re:I knew a guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, you sure showed him. He goes home and cashes his paychecks and makes a good living, and you flame people on the full-disclosure mailing list. You should try bringing cardboard signs to ballgames some time.

  22. 180's nonconsensual installations -- video proof by bedelman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, this is the same 180solutions whose software has been so frequently observed to become installed through security exploits.

    Most recently -- just last week! -- I posted video proof showing 180 installing even after users specifically decline and refuse 180. Details.

    Too little too late, indeed!

  23. makes sense now by fearanddread · · Score: 4, Informative
    Makes more sense when you see the update at the bottom of the article:

    "UPDATE, 5:44 p.m. ET: Spyware researcher Eric Howes points out that it is perhaps clearer to say that 180 will no longer allow third parties to install its software unless the method of install is first approved by 180. More specifically, the company will no longer let third-parties install its software via "ActiveX," a component included in Internet Explorer that spyware purveyors commonly abuse to install their wares with little or no interaction on the part of the user."

  24. Re: free speech for malware authors? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    What i would like to see i a S###ware scanner / remover with a LINUX runtime
    Think of it you yank the harddrive do the file scan export the registry hive scan that
    do your fixes import the registry hive back. reinstall the harddrive and collect your check (after testing)

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  25. It's called 'estimates' by geekoid · · Score: 1

    you right an estimate based on your experinece. It can be a 'book' estimate(a set of hours you charge even if you work fewer or more hours. common in the auto industry.) or real hours.
    You give the customer your estimate. If they agree, then you do the job your paid to do.
    Many years ago I worked in the TV repair industry. Same issue. someone brings in a 300 dollar TV and want the Tube replaced. you smile and tell them they can buy a new one for the same price. They agree, you do the work. Of course,75% of the time they never come back to pay and pick up the TV. But in your case you are acttually in their house, so it makes it harder to dodge paying you.

    You have other option to help your customer as well:
    1) Teach them how to do it. Now you have a 'valus add' so they feel empowered an not ripped off.

    2) you tell them they can buy new pc for less, and tell them how much you charge to move their data over.

    There is nothing wrong with making money this way as long as the custmoer knows the total bill(+- 10%) at the begining.

    now if you just say 45 an hour, then 10 hours later you drop a bill for 450 dollars, yeah your going to have sticker shock.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. Wait.... by emrysk · · Score: 2, Funny

    180 solutions to cut back on spyware? Isn't that a little excessive?

  27. Another approach at solving your malware problems by cached · · Score: 1

    Billy solves his problems by calling up his mom Heather solves her problems with drugs and alcohol Daniel solves his problems with a doctor and the law, But Malcolm has his own way, and it's better than them all.. Malcolm solves his problems with a chainsaw! Malcolm solves his problems with a chainsaw! Malcolm solves his problems with a chainsaw! And he never has the same problem twice! Whether it's a bill or a cheque arriving late, Rancid marble cheese or a steak that's second-rate, Awful TV programs or a broken Elvis plate, or his fiance who dumps him because he's gaining weight.. Malcolm solves his problems with a chainsaw! Malcolm solves his problems with a chainsaw! Malcolm solves his problems with a chainsaw! And he never has the same problem twice!

    --
    +1 funny, -2 overrated. Life isn't fair.
  28. summary wrong by minus_273 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The submitter didn't read the article or misunderstood it. If you read TFA you see tht they ar still allowing spyware installs.

    "
      it is perhaps clearer to say that 180 will no longer allow third parties to install its software unless the method of install is first approved by 180. More specifically, the company will no longer let third-parties install its software via "ActiveX," a component included in Internet Explorer that spyware purveyors commonly abuse to install their wares with little or no interaction on the part of the user.

    "

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:summary wrong by SComps · · Score: 1

      I had post today. Slash's CSS mangled it. Then the page expired. The best part is that it wasn't even a troll! :)

      Anyhow the short version is that the skiddies will find away around anything to get the income from installing this crap. Bundle the package with something else.. other pukeware--yes it's already being done-- then install THAT via ActiveX and the deed is done. 180 gets to be happy because they were installed via a bundler; and the pimply faced weasel gets to feel proud for putting one over on gramma AND 180 solutions.

      yay.

  29. Isn't this rather like... by sanx · · Score: 4, Funny
    180 Solutions to cut down on spyware installs

    Isn't this rather like promising you'll only beat your wife once a week from now on?

    1. Re:Isn't this rather like... by DaHat · · Score: 1

      What is this... 'wife' you speak of?

    2. Re:Isn't this rather like... by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the funny mod, but honestly, mod parent Insightful.

    3. Re:Isn't this rather like... by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      It's more like only letting people you like beat your wife whenever they want...

  30. They'll be back by chandoni · · Score: 1

    Since users know who they are, I'm sure they'll just change their name and go right on doing what they used to do. See Gator -> Claria or School of the Americas -> WHINSEC.

  31. Re:Somehow I doubt getting approval will be very h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You miss the point.. (but being that you are most likely running on Linux, that's hardly a suprise as you probably don't come across a lot of spyware or understand their tactics) Before when someone "unscrupulous" would distribute their software via exploits in the Windows OS or IE, 180 could always claim that they had no affiliation with such and such site. This is one step closer to being able to hold them accountable for the more shady distribution methods of said software (which they have secretly promoted all along)

  32. Gettin' tired... by Aenema · · Score: 2, Funny

    of their own popups?

  33. CHM Exploit by jofi · · Score: 0
    Since someone mentioned it, the CHM exploit has a large market because those people decided not to install that patch a year or so ago. Went to a million warez/porn sites and they only had the same exact CHM exploit.

    Non-admin users cannot be affected by it with or without the patch.

    --
    Blame the user, not the software.
  34. small claims court etc. by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Informative
    Cop says "Do everything you can (legally of course) to recover the cash. If talking doesn't work, THEN we'll file in a legal criminal complaint and it'll go to court. Because if you go to court and she simply agrees to pay, you look like the dumbass.

    A dumbass who has his $2,000.

    The cop said that because the court system is overloaded, nobody gives a crap, and they're hoping you just go away. The theory goes that you'll get worn out doing the "everything you can" bit, and by the time it comes to filing a claim in small claims court (which is where you might want to consider going, but I'm not a lawyer, so do your homework), you'll be too exasperated.

    The proper course of action is a registered letter that is polite; ask for the money. Wait a week or two. Then send a registered letter which says (basically) "I sent you a registed letter which was signed for on X/Y/ZZZZ by ___, which asked for the money you owe me. You did not reply. You have until _/_/___ to give me my money back, or I take you to court to recover the money." Give a reasonable time period. Photocopy both letters before they're sent.

    Then you sue them in small claims court. Why this quick? Because once you have a judgement, you get costs of filing plus costs of recouping the funds, PLUS assistance (I believe) from the Sherriff in recouping funds (if necessary, seizure of assets!) because it's a court order. Best part? If they don't show up- judgement in your favor, automatically.

    If you go to a lot of effort or money to recoup the money before filing the case, you're much less likely to get it back. Folks- courts really aren't nearly as big a deal as they sound. Civil and small claims court are where these matters are SUPPOSED to get settled!

  35. A floppy disk? by mi · · Score: 1
    I don't think this big, floppy disk will fit in my tiny drive.
    Mine is hard!
    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:A floppy disk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > I don't think this big, floppy disk will fit in my tiny drive.

      > Mine is hard!

      Yeah, but it's still only a 2 1/2" model.

  36. Re: free speech for malware authors? by dbIII · · Score: 1
    What i would like to see i a S###ware scanner / remover with a LINUX runtime
    F-prot antivirus for linux gets some stuff, but I don't know if it cleans out the registry entries. I've managed to get rid of some malware (some sort of porndialer) that way with knoppix and a demo version of f-prot.
  37. Thanks to 180 Solutions by svunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everything I know about keeping a computer clean I learned after these evil bastards infected me. However, this is NOT worth slashdotting, any more than Bill Gates donating money to the Salvation Army is. 180's software is still malicious, insidious garbage, regardless of how they spring it on unsuspecting innocents. Big fucking deal, really.

  38. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dualing Anonymous Coward Spelling/Grammar Nazis. Oh boy, this is what I come to Slashdot for, because I don't already have enough losers in my life.

  39. Re: free speech for malware authors? by 1336 · · Score: 1

    [Mopping up Malware]
    Frankly, it's boring, and sometimes even tedious work.

    My neighbor, a very nice older lady, bought a semi-functional computer at a garage sale. I reinstalled Windows and put Ad-Aware, Spybot Search & Destory, Spyware Blaster, AVG and Firefox on it to make sure it didn't get infected. But yah, the time required to scan for malicious software was terrible.

    She wanted to upgrade to something newer, so I sold her a laptop I had that runs Ubuntu Linux. I set it up to look almost identical to Windows and for her purposes (basic internet, webmail and some music) its indistinguishable; she's really happy so far and I won't have to go over nearly as often since I also showed her how to click the update indicator ;) My next visit over there will be in a couple days when ubuntu 5.10 is released, just to make sure the transition goes smoothly.

    I'd strongly recommend that if you're helping computer novices who just want relatively-simple tasks from their computers (e.g. web surfing, e-mail, some text/document editing, maybe even the occasional spreadsheet, simple computer games (like the ones that come with Windows), playing CDs/MP3s; that sort of thing), that you steer them clear of Windows and onto one of the user-friendly GUI-based Linux distros, like Ubuntu :)

  40. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Is it moral or ethical to profit from others peoples misseries?

    I just wiped off a rootkit from my system. There was no removal program that could delete it and it liked to hang out at the MBR of my drive. I reformatted my disk and lost 6 years worth of data. For those who say I should have backed everything up, I will say I can not afford a nice tape drive and a scsi card since its a home system. So I am hosed.

    My rootkit got installed from a video file that used a buffer overflow to install itself. No EULA or anything. I have no clue if it was a worm or spyware but my point is many Spyware makers are no going as far as installing rootkits and hiding in the MBR so a system restore by the manufactor wont fix it. I mean CHRIST how far is this going to go?

    My last job was at an AOL call center and I heard people cry and moan why their pc's slowed down with popup ads and I am powerless to say anythign besides our own anti-spyware programs. I have seen full windows restores that do not wipe these things yet for liablity can not say do fdisk /mbr as I could lose my job.

    Its a serious problem and removing spyware is not very profit oriented when you are graded on how many systems you do an hour. Especially an unresponsive system which takes 40 minutes to install adaware. Not all of us have the luxury of charging $80/hr to download adaware.

    Hang these F&*ckers indeed

  41. Just an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so many people hate them, why do they still exist? They must recruit employees somehow, so some people could join them, then introduce such buggy code into the programs that they won't even work. Or possibly make it delete other spyware/adware/malware on the system. They have to hire us eventually. Unless they're staffed by oompa-loompas...

    1. Re:Just an idea by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately we can't all hope for well-meaning people to pick and choose their employers, for many people (and often understandably), they'll work for whoever will hire them at the best salary, ethics be damned.

      As for adding bugs into the software, that's rather useless, all software development companies worth even a grain of salt will use versioning software such as SourceSafe, in other words, if some employee with minimal scruples decided to mess with the software, the Team Leader could just do a roll-back of the source code (restoring it to a previous state) and toss the developer who added the bug, out on his ass.

  42. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I reformatted my disk and lost 6 years worth of data. For those who say I should have backed everything up, I will say I can not afford a nice tape drive and a scsi card since its a home system.

    I'm not sure where you get the idea that you need a tape drive + SCSI, an external USB hard drive would suffice.

  43. Um, it was a joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent comment was a "joke", don't you feel silly now?

  44. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Mister_IQ · · Score: 1

    Or a $40 dvd burner.

  45. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Both of you guys show me an addordable way to store 100gigs of data and I am there.

  46. Re: free speech for malware authors? by zvar · · Score: 1

    $50 - dvd burner (high end price)
    $15 - 25 pack dvd's (high end price)

    To me that's cheap for 100gb of backup storage.

  47. A Little Misleading by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aside from noting that an adware company ending their bundling of spyware with their product is roughly analogous to a suicide bomber deciding not to include shrapnel in his bomb when he takes out school bus, the article is mistitled. 180 Solutions is not, in fact, cutting spyware out of the picture. Reading the article reveals they are merely ceasing the inclusion of Integrated Search Technologies marvelous toolbar/browser hijackers.

    Man how I love getting called in to fix a slow computer and seeing 3 or 4 of those toolbars, plus Yahoo, Google, and Lycos toolbars taking up half the screen.

  48. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Mister_IQ · · Score: 1

    - Buy a second 100 gig hard drive. - Use 20 DVDs. Less if compressed with Ghost or software like that. Not necessarily elegant, but cheap. Either of those is cheaper than losing 6 years of *my* data. But apparently not yours. The way you're complaining, backing up 20 dvd's is far more of a pain than losing all that data, so don't worry about it, it couldn't have been that important. You learn the "how much inconvenience is worth it" lesson once. Now when you rebuild your system completely from scratch you can ask the question again. Perhaps the answer will be different, perhaps not. Either way, you've made that call and there are no more complaints.

  49. Re: free speech for malware authors? by CharlesDonHall · · Score: 1
    Both of you guys show me an addordable way to store 100gigs of data and I am there.

    What do you consider affordable? CompUSA is selling 80GB USB drives for $99 and 160GB drives for $129...or half of that if you're willing to get Brand X hardware and go through mail-in rebate hell.

    Or you can get an internal drive for the same amount of money...yank the old drive, do a fresh O/S install on the new one, and then install the old drive as a secondary and access your files from there.

  50. I can't believe I'm the first to say this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But does this mean 180 Solutions is pulling a 180? ::ducks::

  51. Objectively please by TouchOfRed · · Score: 0

    Why in the name of all things holy, would people WANT this on their computers? I seriously doubt one day, hell, one minute goes by with their developers thinking, This product is going to kick ass, and people are going to enjoy our service(ie: MS,Bungie,iD,valve, etc etc etc.). Its a damn shame people that make this crap cant be taken out by the FCC/BBB/someotherauthority. I know people make money off of this stuff, but it drives me crazy as a developer to see how and why people make this.

  52. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will say I can not afford a nice tape drive and a scsi card since its a home system. So I am hosed.

    I understand you did not have a backup but there really is cheap ways to backup stuff but you have to plan ahead.

    For the basics.. I always create a C and a D drive on any Windows PC I create. Typically C is 10-20GB and D is the rest. This was more for back in the days when you had to reinstall Windows 95-98 all the time to keep it running. That has not been the case since 2000 but I still use two partitions anyway. Put the OS on the C partition and install everything else to D:\Progam Files instead of C. For reinstall times, you can move stuff to D and reformat C at will. Obviously if the MBR is corrupt, you would need other tools to recover or if the HD itself fails, you are hosed if you only use that method.
    If possible use a second HD in the same system. Depending on the size, you can back stuff up to this drive. Windows backup and the system scheduler works good for this and is included with W2K and XP (maybe not XP Home, not sure). I only back up the Documents and Setting directory and any "Data" or "Download" directories I may have. I also use a program called SyncBack, not OSS but the no cost version works fine and provides a rsync style backup that can also be run using the Windows system scheduler.
    If you have more then one computer in the house, you can share out a drive on each and use Windows Backup or Syncback to backup the above mentioned files to the share on the other computer. If one computer fails, you have the important data backed up to another one. I use this method quite often in small offices I have setup and they have limited money or technical skills. Typical small office PCs do not use more then 5-10GB of the HD and come with at least 40GB drives. This provides more then enough space to backup computers to each other in a small workgroup. Call it cheesy, call it stupid but it works and is far better then nothing.

    Even a step further is to use some type of file server. I'd assume if you are at this technical level where you had a dedicated file server, you would already be using some type of backup. I am just bringing this up as it is the next logical step. Either way..
    I use a Samba file server with a share for each PC I need to backup. Each PC uses a combination of SyncBack and Windows backup to place files on the server on a schedule. The file server itself has multiple drives and I use rysnc and plain of compressed tars via cron to backup to a different physical disk at least weekly. I do not actually backup the backups of the PCs but the actual shares and the Samba server itself.
    I also burn stuff to DVDs when I get about 4.5 worth of unbacked up stuff (isos, my mp3 files, camera pictires etc.) If you wait to long, and try to backup 100GB of stuff you will get bored very quick. I usually take these DVDs to my parents house when I visit them.

    There are many many ways to backup data, mine is not the most logical for everyone but it is cheap and is reliable. There really is going to be NO sympathy if you chose to not back stuff up on a regular basis. It is not a matter of if a HD fails, but when.

       

  53. Re: free speech for malware authors? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

    And lord help you when they get a new ISP with custom drivers for the modem that will only install on windows...

  54. Who is 180 Solutions? by joelsanda · · Score: 2, Funny

    MacOS users are dyin' to know ;-)

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
  55. The proper solution by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    Lawyers in Illinois filed a class action lawsuit against 180 last month. Check out the article at ZDnet
    http://blogs.zdnet.com/Spyware/?p=655

    Now we just need the same thing to happen in 49 other states, the legal fees alone should bankrupt the company! Just make sure it stays separate suits and is not allowed to merge into one big one.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  56. Wretched Hive of Scum and.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company that I work for was contacted by either 180solutions, or a company on their behalf. Basically they offered us X views/month at Y dollars of "high quality, targeted customers that willingly use their toolbar." Of course, they didn't tell us up front that is was 180Solutions, but after some prodding they did tell us, and we couldn't hang up the phone fast enough. Anyone who has ever had to run SpyBot or AdAware knows the vile name of 180Solutions.

  57. Bam! by The+NPS · · Score: 1

    I'd love to get a chance to beat the shit out of people who make spyware. I feel like I'd be really playing on their level. No legal crap, no anti-spyware program, just a baseball bat to the face. I don't like my computer being manipulated and I don't like being lied to, so I'm guessing they don't like their nose being smashed in.

  58. Re:180's nonconsensual installations -- video proo by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

    Consider it your punishment for:

    A: using to Internet Explorer to
    B: look at Pro Wrestling sites.

    --
    "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
  59. Re: free speech for malware authors? by BobTheAtheist · · Score: 1

    Its spelt looser!

    --
    -- You're too stupid to be an atheist.
  60. Yeah... by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    I believe AIM also installs wildtagent too... or did. I haven't updated my AIM for almost a year now though.

    1. Re:Yeah... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I don't recall WildTangent, but someone DID install AIM on my laptop, and WeatherBug found its way on.

      Not spyware, AFAICT, but it's crapware. (Then again, many would say Windows falls in the definition of crapware - software that drastically affects the performance of the system, and is hard to remove, but isn't spyware.)

    2. Re:Yeah... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And before I get flamed out...

      Windows, of course, is easy to remove. FORMAT C: /U, and a 9x is gone. Just install a Linux distro, and many will give you one click to kill Windows.

      I was just saying that some would throw it in that category.

  61. Re: free speech for malware authors? by ankarbass · · Score: 1

    I ALWAYS put my data on its own partition. If I need to reinstall my OS it just isn't an issue. Keep in mind I use linux and have no idea how friendly modern microsoft os's are to such an arrangement.

    --
    Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
  62. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is good until you come across malware that silently encrypts your data to thwart recovery and you have already overwritten your backup drive with the encrypted data. To be safe you need to have several backups (5-10 minimum) and rotate between them. In that case tape is better. Consider the cost of a SCSI card ($150.00) a tape drive ($500.00) and a bunch of tapes ($20.00 for 50GB? for tapes) it is much less expensive to use tape for backup.

  63. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I think you're dumb, but your customers are dumber than shit. Be glad dumbass morons pay a monkey like you.

  64. No, thanks by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    See, even without going into what's morally wrong with that attitude (it's been said already anyway), it's a piss-poor use of my time anyway.

    1. It's not the job I wanted to do. If I wanted to clean up crap, I'd be a janitor. I'm a programmer. There's a difference. I'd rather spend my time coding or playing a game, than searching through someone's registry for crap

    (The same goes, btw, for crap like "I bought an ancient scanner at a flea market. Can you please make it work?" Then it turns out it's an ancient SCSI model from back in the DOS times, that nowadays the manufacturer doesn't even admit ever having sold.)

    2. How much _do_ you get paid for it anyway? If I were to charge someone, say, my consultant fee for that time (as an arbitrary measure of my time's worth: that's how much I'd get paid at work for that time), chances are they could just buy a new computer, including OS, for that money.

    In practice most people I know get paid some token price, if at all. Even on /. pretty much _the_ standard post about it is along the lines of "yay, I got a pizza for fixing their computer". Or a beer, or a homecooked meal, or whatever. I'm sorry, unless you're a teenager without an allowance or living on a 1-2$ per hour wage in East Elbonia, that doesn't even start to be adequate compensation. Taking a part time job at McDonalds would likely pay more money per hour than that.

    And let's go back to the "if at all" part. What most people seem to want isn't to pay a professional to have their computer serviced, but to mooch some free repairs off a nerd who (in their opinion) had nothing better to do with his time anyway. Asking for money, more often than not won't get you paid, it will just get them offended. (Though on the bright side, sometimes they're offended enough to stop asking for free tech support.)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  65. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you say he is a crappy excuse ofr an I.T. person.
    What does doing tech support for home pc users have to do with I.T. ?

  66. Only needs 1 sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just can't understand how anyone could willingly work to make this kind of product.

    It doesnt matter if they are out numbered by 1000 to 1 by ethical proffessionals, because you only need 1 sociopath for this stuff to get written.

  67. Adware/spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i work at a school that has a pretty limited IT budget - we still have a load of machines running windows 98, for example. The amount of problems we have with adware, although less now i've started using spybot and adware, is still annoying. The worst to hit us was CoolWebSearch and variants. Some of the CWS variants also *appeared* to originate from yahoo website addresses. I had made a note of them but it appears to have been deleted =+(
    anyway, 180 is a close second, but methinks this announcement is not worthy of attention

  68. All they had to do is threaten a complaint??? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    "180Solutions's move comes after the Center for Democracy & Technology, a public interest group based in Washington, D.C., threatened to file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission over 180's business practices."
    So, all that one has to do is THREATEN a complaint to get something done about intrusive and abusive software? Please complain anyway, speaking on behalf of everyone I know, we don't like their business practices!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  69. Company Software by Redwin · · Score: 1

    I wonder if all employees have to use the company software. :-)

    Also from their website:

    Another differentiating factor between 180solutions and its competitors is that 180solutions is committed to only showing an average of 2-3 ads per day per user. We have also made the uninstall process easy for those who choose not to use 180solutions' products.

    I wonder if the 2-3 ads per day is total or per user installation. Also, many programs that come with spyway/adware won't run if they can't find said spyware/adware. Consequentially people reinstall the program again getting back to where they started.

    More info about the split is on their site

    --
    Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    1. Re:Company Software by Peeptophe · · Score: 0

      We have also made the uninstall process easy for those who choose not to use 180solutions' products."

      Does anyone know of someone that ever WILLFULLY decided to use their software? There shouldn't be a simple uninstall because there shouldn't have been an install in the first place.

      --
      * Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes *
    2. Re:Company Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, 2 or 3 ads a day. Coincidentally, those are usually delivered the first time a user starts their browser. Also "We have also made the uninstall process easy"? Uh, last time I tried the "uninstall" on a 180Solutions-infested machine, it was easy, but it DIDN'T ACTUALLY UNINSTALL. I had to manually clean it out, and it was a mess! Maybe they do better now, but a clean uninstall isn't much of a consolation for something that, if properly informed, a user wouldn't install in the first place.

  70. Provide some value then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install Enough is Enough. https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/ehowes/www/resource6.htm
    If all your doing is removing the crapware currently on their computer only to return another day your not providing any value.

  71. Re:180's nonconsensual installations -- video proo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't just post video proof.

    Sue the bastards. Or get someone else to sue and just provide the evidence.

  72. Cutting Back by Peeptophe · · Score: 0

    They decided to "cut back".

    That's like a serial killer deciding to only kill 1 or 2 people a year rather than the usual 4.

    Any company that uses 180 as a marketing firm should be boycotted.

    --
    * Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes *
  73. Actually . . . by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

    If these people think that users will really take the time to implement all 180 Solutions just to get rid of spyware they're crazy!


    Sorry, that was terrible!

  74. There *should* be a lawsuit... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Oh, how many times have I seen 180's crap come up in an 'Adaware' search? How many hours have I spent cleaning up after their mess? I'd sooo love to be part of a class action lawsuit against these guys.

    Mind you, installing stuff with the permission of the user is one thing, installing crapware through ActiveX and Java holes is another.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  75. We need a virus that targets Adware/Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same way viruses will be used to destroy diseases, they should be used to target the computers of companies or individuals that develop this crap...

    CZ

  76. Hm, morals or starve? by dptalia · · Score: 1

    Having been unemployed for 13 months (not any longer, Thank God) let me tell you that If a spyware company had offered to hire me at a reasonable rate during that time I would have jumped at the offer (well, not until month 8 or so). It's nice to get up on your high horse and wonder why people do this, but when it's either code for scum or you and your family losing their home you realize that food is a lot more important than morals.

    --
    Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
  77. Re: free speech for malware authors? by jred · · Score: 1

    Dueling
    Fuck AnonCows.

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  78. Re: free speech for malware authors? by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

    But like I tell lots of customers, I'd *much* rather being doing something else for my money.

    What is stopping you? Do you have some sort of obligation to charge people to take spyware off of their computers? Why not just get a new job, that you would *much* rather be doing?

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  79. re: different job? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Well, I happen to *like* doing on-site computer service, and right now, spyware and virus infections are an unfortunate reality of the industry. Many times, I'm not even sure what's wrong with someone's machine until I actually arrive on-site and start looking at it. People just tell you things like "It crashes a lot." or "I can't get my printer to work." and that could be a hundred different problems.

    The reason I point out my dislike of spyware removal jobs to customers is because I want them to be aware that all of us working as computer consultants or technicians aren't running around, overjoyed that this stuff is breaking computers and causing people grief. I had one guy, for example, who told me he suspected "computer techs like me actually *wrote* all this stuff so we could create work for ourselves". And you can hardly blame him for coming up with that notion.

  80. Re: free speech for malware authors? by 1336 · · Score: 1

    We both use cable modems, so that's fortunately not a problem :)

  81. Linguistic shifting can have profound effects... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    Erm, that's entirely accurate. Lots of people call anything of the sort spyware, even if all it does is display ads. That's linguistic shift for you.

    A linguistic shift it may be, and probably not intentional at all, but rather the results of ignorance. That is not to say that linguistic shift is a good thing, however. In many cases, such shifts can be detrimental to downright nasty.

    One of recent note that has been railed upon endlessly here and elsewhere has been the shift/mixing of the terms "cracker" versus "hacker". Now, mind you, the term "hacker" has almost always had a slight "edge" to it, which made it a natural to hang it onto the idea of "shifty dude who knows computers at wizard level". Some people (myself included), hated the negative undertones, and preferred the original idea and meaning of the term, in which a hacker was just someone who was very, very good at a particular "thing", typically meaning working/programming with computers. It was seen as a badge of honor. Social forces among hackers brought the term "cracker" to bear upon those who used their hacking skills for bad. Other social forces, likely stronger, though, rendered the terms "hacker" and "cracker" meaningless, and mixed them both, and since "hacker" was the older of the two and already, in the general mainstream, had negative undertones, the term "hacker" has come to mean "criminal who works with computers" - but it still has the "romantic" undertones (similar to the word "pirate" - I mean, pirates were - and still are - bad people. Pirate groups were/are akin to today's street gangs, just on the sea. But there is still a "romantic" level of the word on which people associate feelings of freedom and adventure). There is also the view among some people (hackers themselves, mainly), who view the shift as a "conspiracy" to make the idea of "great computer knowledge" something which should be feared and possibly illegal. Whether this is true or not is besides the point (I doubt it is true, at least on a grand scale), the fact is that people are uneasy, somewhat scared, of what really goes on "inside the box", and people who are able to manipulate it adroitly are viewed with caution (similar in some respects to the alchemists of old). Funny it is to us who really understand the machines, and realize they are really nothing more than a fancy, souped-up form of player-piano. I wonder if people are or were afraid of how player-pianos worked?

    Thus, you can see how linguistic shifts, whether due to societal pressures, or done purposefully via someone or group with an agenda to push, can help perpetuate and in some cases cause shifts in perception and thinking. After all, language plays a great part as something with which we work in our minds to symbolically connect thoughts and ideas, and ultimately think with. Shift the language, and you shift the thoughts, and ultimately the actions. If you can understand this, and furthermore if you can understand NLP (neural-linguistic programming - essentially a method of understanding how thoughts, vocal language, and body language interact to influence your own and other's thoughts, feelings, and actions) - you can, in essence, hack your own mind and the minds of others! This isn't a new thing - it is a natural thing for most humans (autistics and Asperger's aside), but most do it unconsciously. If you understand how it really works, and are completely aware of it at all time, you can use this to your advantage.

    Other such linguistic shifts, over time, can mask negative aspects of situations and ideas. This form of linguistic shift even has a name - "politically correct" - which is, in and of itself, a self-referential linguistic shifting and mixing of several terms. In essence, it means a softening of language so as not to offend another's sensibility. Unfortunately, it also has the side effect of shifting the ideas to which the terms are connected in such a manner as to make those ideas soften, or seem "better", than they really are. George Carlin has a great bit on all

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  82. Great, less unwanted software by computergeek1200 · · Score: 1

    I hope that this does reduce the amount of unwanted 3rd party software on program installers. If you do have this junk on your computer, I recommend Ad-Aware.

  83. Re: free speech for malware authors? by roger_and_out · · Score: 1

    Ditto here, King_TJ! You wrote the piece I was going to, word for word. This malware stuff will kill the usage of the internet for some folks who will just give up hope of getting only what they asked for. It has serious implications for legitimate business users of the net and their customers.

    --
    Sig server unavailable. Please try again later.