Slashdot Mirror


ITunes Australia Goes Live

daria42 writes "ITunes Australia has finally gone live, after more than a year of waiting. Apple is holding a press conference in Sydney this morning to officially launch the service to the media, but the store has already opened. Like the Japanese ITunes store, it looks like Sony-BMG is not participating."

233 comments

  1. Frist P5ot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what the sad thing is? This idiot editor ScuttleMonkey picked from an obviously massive number of iTunes Australia submissions the one that doesn't write iTunes correctly.

    GG SCUTTLEMONKEY! Want a free Ipod?

    1. Re:Frist P5ot by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      At least Cmdr. Taco didn't pick it up... Then it would have been:

      "Less songs than MSN Music. No Sony. Lame."

    2. Re:Frist P5ot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow man, that was so funny! LOLOLO /sarcasm

    3. Re:Frist P5ot by mbbac · · Score: 0, Troll

      iTunes is how Apple writes it. That's marketing speak.

      Itunes or ITunes is how it should be written in English since it is a proper noun.

      --

      mbbac

    4. Re:Frist P5ot by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      If the name of a person or thing specifically includes a lowercase first letter, then it overrides the auto-cap of a normal proper noun. There are numerous examples of this, mostly having to do with brand names, ie id Software, gescheidle gallery, etc. Yes, it's marketing and branding, but that doesn't mean it isn't their name. This even extends to people's names; you can legally change it to have it properly referred to with lowercase.

    5. Re:Frist P5ot by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Citation?

      --

      mbbac

    6. Re:Frist P5ot by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      Apple

      Also, just do a search for APA and capitalization + trademarks and brand names.

    7. Re:Frist P5ot by mbbac · · Score: 1
      If you're binding yourself by Apple's Copyright and Trademark Guidlines, then I suppose you should pay particular attention to this section:
      Unauthorized Use of Apple Trademarks
      4. Disparaging Manner: You may not use an Apple trademark or any other Apple-owned graphic symbol, logo, or icon in a disparaging manner.
      I also don't consider the American Psychological Association the best authority on proper capitalization. Wikipedia's style guide agrees with me on this. It was the first reputable one I came across.
      --

      mbbac

    8. Re:Frist P5ot by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      There are two commonly used standards for writing in academia and print (I'm referring to the U.S. here); the APA and CMS, respectively. If we're going strictly by Wikipedia (not really the best for writing styles), you would either use iTunes followed by Itunes for the rest of a piece, or you would defer to an editor (though neither is spelled out definitively in the article). With that in mind, going by general consensus in print (and therefore their copy editors), iTunes is accepted use. Furthermore, the reference to Apple was simply to point out what their standard usage of the brand name is; I submit it for record simply because when one of my fellow writers (I work at a fairly large and well known New York-based magazine) used 'Itunes', it was corrected and referenced to the Apple page.

      Similarly, whenever we are required to refer to a specific and proper name with a lowercase first initial (again, gescheidle gallery), unless we append a [sic], we follow the guidelines put forth by the owners and/or creators. This is simply because more times than not, companies will ask for a correction after publication. Finally, anyone who doesn't roll with the progression of standard language usage and grammar will be steamrolled.

      If you go to any CMS progression session (they have numerous throughout the year), trademarks always come up. The general consensus is that if is formalized (there are numerous definitions that CMS gives for that), defer. The standard arguments of the destruction of the written form and other such nonsense are always thrown around; rest assured that we will not descend into sTRanGe and ArBItraRY rules, as both the APA and CMS lean heavily against such esoterics outside of proper nouns. This is especially prevalent in the APA style; CC's and reverse-case drug brand names have been around long before things such as 'iTunes' appeared on the scene.

      It was put more succinctly by our head copy editor. "If your name is joe james, that's how we refer to you. If it's stupid, the reader will decide."

    9. Re:Frist P5ot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Similarly, whenever we are required to refer to a specific and proper name with a lowercase first initial (again, gescheidle gallery), unless we append a [sic], we follow the guidelines put forth by the owners and/or creators. This is simply because more times than not, companies will ask for a correction after publication."

      You do this because you are beholden to those companies for their advertizing dollars.

    10. Re:Frist P5ot by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      The most ironic statement on the planet since we don't accept advertising. It's a literature magazine.

    11. Re:Frist P5ot by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      They trademarked "Moof"?!?

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    12. Re:Frist P5ot by rstultz · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not sure who you write for, though later you suggest it is a literature magazine, which may explain your answer, but as a copy-editor and page designer I can tell you that the overriding authority for the vast majority of print publications, television stations and online news sites is the AP stylebook.

      I don't have the newest stylebook, so I'm not sure if they have an individual entry for iTunes yet (they will, they have company names, products, everything under the sun that doesn't adhere to basic style guidelines). But after 5 years of being a copy-editor for daily papers, I feel pretty comfortable calling this one. If it is the beginning of the sentence, it's capitalized. Don't care who/what it is, it's capitalized. Otherwise, write it like the owner/person wants.

      And, just to cover my ass, I went and checked out the Times and a few other reliable newspapers. That's how they treat iTunes.

      And I'd say Slashdot's style guide should follow AP (since it it a news site) if it actually followed any guidelines.

      Ryan Stultz

  2. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    nice url

  3. Mod up dumbasses by FullCircle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Modding down the only people who TRY to RTFA?

    The URL is WRONG

    --
    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
  4. Global store? by bugbeak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure there are numerous world branches of just about every major record label out there. What's stopping Apple from running a global iTunes Music Store?

    1. Re:Global store? by akac · · Score: 3, Informative

      Simple - each record company is a single company but they operate separate divisions in each region and each division/branch deals with the copyrights in their own country.

    2. Re:Global store? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Though I haven't tried it, I'm wondering if you can buy a song from the US iTunes web site with an Australian credit card (say a visa one). Does it not work even if you pretend the browser is in the US?

      Though admittedly there is a problem with this in that you wouldn't get any or very much Australian music which is quite popular at the moment and growing in popularity, but still there's plenty of good American music I listen to.

    3. Re:Global store? by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm sure there are numerous world branches of just about every major record label out there. What's stopping Apple from running a global iTunes Music Store?

      The record companies. The songs are licensed for sale in one country only. Apple would love to be able to offer their entire catalog to anybody anywhere, but the record companies won't allow that. They have to negotiate completely separate licensing agreements for each country.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:Global store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wouldn't be able to price gouge the western countries.

    5. Re:Global store? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be able to "adjust" prices based on the user's country, then - or at least not as easily.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    6. Re:Global store? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Though I haven't tried it, I'm wondering if you can buy a song from the US iTunes web site with an Australian credit card (say a visa one). Does it not work even if you pretend the browser is in the US?

      I'm pretty sure it's based entirely on the billing address for your credit card. I'm not sure about the free songs they have every week though - here in the US, you can download them without a credit card (you have to sign up with a username and password, but a credit card is not required until you actually spend money on something). Look for the "Free Download - Single of the Week" box on the front page (it changes every Tuesday).

      You can definitely play the 30-second previews from any country.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    7. Re:Global store? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      as alluded to, you ened the right billing address.

      I tried a few months ago just to get my damn podcast included in the itunes directory

      but it's all happy happy joy joy now.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    8. Re:Global store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have to negotiate completely separate licensing agreements for each country.
      Says the record companies. When is a distribution company going to put the record companies in their place and do what what everybody wants? I'm pretty sure that is increasing musician profits while making it easier for the consumer to get music. And by everybody I meant all the humans. Not those creatures you call "record executives". I'm pretty sure Record Executives have their own D&D creature encyclopedia entry. If not they should.

    9. Re:Global store? by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just tried it. The US store pops up a one-button dialog box:

      "Your account is only valid for purchases in the Australian Music Store. Clicking OK will take you to this store. [OK]"

    10. Re:Global store? by JWW · · Score: 2, Funny

      The record companies. The songs are licensed for sale in one country only. Apple would love to be able to offer their entire catalog to anybody anywhere, but the record companies won't allow that. They have to negotiate completely separate licensing agreements for each country.

      What, are the record companies stupid or something? ... oh, wait, nevermind.

    11. Re:Global store? by jcr · · Score: 1

      What's stopping Apple from running a global iTunes Music Store?

      In a nutshell: outdated business practices on the part of the record companies. Believe me, Apple would far rather have a single store, and just do language localization.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:Global store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're going to say something as stupid as "outdated business practices," you might as well go the full distance and put the blame where it really belongs: national sovereignty.

      See, different countries have different laws regarding taxation, contracts, royalties and licenses. If you buy a copy of the latest Limozeen album in Taiwan, the retailer has to handle the local taxes differently and the record company has to pay royalties differently than if you bought it in Topeka.

      Why? Because the people of Taiwan have decided that they want different laws than those the people of Kansas have.

      So really, the problem is sovereignty. If we could just conquer the world and force everybody to use the same laws, Apple would be able to have one big iTunes store.

      (Fucking idiot.)

    13. Re:Global store? by patio11 · · Score: 1

      And this is *bloody annoying*. I have two iTunes accounts, one for America and one for Japan (where I live). Not only do I need two iTunes accounts, each of them has to be tied to a credit card in the respective country (which caused me no end of trouble with my bank trying to keep an American address registered on my bank account for online non-physical purchases), and both of them had to point to seperate email accounts as well. I understand the reasoning, in an abstract way, but I'd gladly put up with paying the (higher by 100%) Japanese prices for *all* of my songs if Apple/the industry could just figure out a way to have the computers route the money internationally instead of putting that onus on me.

    14. Re:Global store? by pookemon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because we are "downunder" you have to invert the soundwaves so that they'll play correctly on our equipment.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    15. Re:Global store? by SJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which is where in Indies should really be pushing...

      "Here Apple, have our entire catalogue for world wide distribution."

      That has to make everyone happy.

    16. Re:Global store? by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Says the record companies. When is a distribution company going to put the record companies in their place and do what what everybody wants?

      Um, yeah, well see, the record companies own the copyrights to the music people want to listen to, so distribution companies can't do anything.

      Unless, of course, a distribution company becomes a powerful monopoly, and the balance of power shifts because the record labels wouldn't be able to sell their music if that company refused to sell it. That's exactly what they're afraid of happening with Apple, which is why they're so reluctant to cooperate - they don't WANT Apple to become too successful, because that would mean Apple would become more powerful than they are.

      If it were anybody else, this wouldn't be hysterically funny, but think about it:

      Record companies are terrified of Apple becoming a monopoly.

      That just cracks me up.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    17. Re:Global store? by shark72 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The record companies."

      Partially correct. In most cases rights must also be secured from whomever owns the publishing rights -- that is, the copyright on the words and the lyrics. Words and music are owned by the songwriter and composer, unless they transfer the rights to somebody else. Record companies typically only own the copyright on that recording of the words and music. Sometimes the local country's artists' rights management societies get involved as well.

      This is important to understand for folks who kneel at the shrine of "record companies bad, artists good." It's not just the greedy, stupid record companies that are getting in the way of progress -- sometimes it's the greedy, stupid songwriters and composers!

      I'm sure you were aware of that, but the way your post was written, it gave the impression that the record companies are the only obstacle.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    18. Re:Global store? by jaseparlo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as most 'pop' music goes, the songwriters and composers are in the employ of, or at least part of the machine with, the record companies, and still little or nothing to do with the perceived 'artist'.

      --
      All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
    19. Re:Global store? by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      If we could just conquer the world and force everybody to use the same laws, Apple would be able to have one big iTunes store.

      Sounds good to me. When can you start?

      P.S. We need an Amazon down here too.

    20. Re:Global store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been _wondering why I've been having problems playing my INXS and AC/DC albums way up here! :-)

    21. Re:Global store? by jcr · · Score: 1

      So really, the problem is sovereignty.

      Sovereignty doesn't prevent a local record company from making a deal, instead of foot-dragging for months and months, as happened in Japan and Australia.

      (Fucking idiot.)

      Yes you are, and abrasive to boot.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    22. Re:Global store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which is where in Indies should really be pushing...

      "Here Apple, have our entire catalogue for world wide distribution."
      They've done that: CDBaby (which is responsible for about a quarter of all songs available in the US iTMS)
    23. Re:Global store? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out my omission; I wasn't thinking of the publishing rights. As another poster said, though, surely in many cases it's the same entity?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    24. Re:Global store? by martinX · · Score: 1

      don't u mean your SXNI and CD\CA albums?

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  5. Super by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's great, but I just hope it doesn't scratch easily.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    1. Re:Super by bach37 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you could just sue.

    2. Re:Super by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My original post was supposed to be a joke about this kind of lunacy, but I don't think it came out quite right.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  6. I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I tried it, but the songs were upside down.

    1. Re:I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't be an idiot, everyone knows they are not upside down, they are reversed.

    2. Re:I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you have to spin the hard disk in the other direction...

    3. Re:I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to change the "hemisphere" setting on your iPod, so the hard drive will spin the other direction.

    4. Re:I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, just stand on your head and it'll sound just fine!

    5. Re:I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Australia, the Record Company plays YOU! Oh that works on so many levels. I am teh L33T!

  7. URL Correction? by draxbear · · Score: 1, Redundant
    --
    --- I've completed diagnosis of your problem and can classify it as a YOYO...You're On Your Own
  8. No Fair Use by ozTravman · · Score: 1, Informative

    Australia has no "Fair Use Policy" laws, so far there has been no test case. This is the reason TiVO has not been introduced to Australia. It is illegal to record any TV show that is not being broadcast live to air. It is also illegal to rip cds to MP3. Apple have finally taken the chance, which is good to see. Hopefully none of the recording labels will launch a lawsuit.

    1. Re:No Fair Use by TeraCo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fair use is irrelevant here, as Apple have permission from the record companies to publish it in the relevant format.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    2. Re:No Fair Use by ozTravman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But what is the user allowed to do with it once they buy it? How many devices can it be stored on?

    3. Re:No Fair Use by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if apple really cares. Regardless of what you do with it, there is no risk from their point of view.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    4. Re:No Fair Use by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      It is also illegal to rip cds to MP3.

      If that's true (I'm not familiar with Australian law), was iTunes (the program) available before? Because you can rip CDs to MP3 with iTunes. Actually, you can do that with most jukebox software. I guess as long as there isn't some DMCA-like law prohibiting ditribution of tools to rip CDs to MP3s, it would be fine. Anyone have any more information?

    5. Re:No Fair Use by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      iTunes itself is a global download, so we've had it for years now.

      And since there's no Fair Use rights, but prosecution would be incredibly hard (the music industry has to find people who buy a CD and then rip it at home - there is no trail to follow) people like me have been merrily ripping their CDs to mp3 format for several years even though it's illegal to do so.

      Apple are doing nothing necessarily wrong, as they could claim that their software could be used to organise either legitimate digital music or our own music that we created. Even the iPod could go under that sort of (fairly specious) claim.

      It gets interesting when you look at Sony, who produce both music and portable digital players. Sometimes it seems like it's two companies, and they aren't friends!

    6. Re:No Fair Use by ozTravman · · Score: 1

      So far this law is untested, no one has been prosecuted for ripping cds to mp3 or recording a show off TV. But the legislation is there for a test case if anyone is unfortunate enough to be picked on by a recording label.

    7. Re:No Fair Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, that's right - we don't have Fair Use - a vague set of conditions that are interpreted at the whim of a judge.

      Instead, like the rest of the world we have Fair Dealing laws that set down your rights in black and white, and are not open to interpretation.

      With Fair Use, if you're lucky you might be protected for certain uses - but there is absolutely no situation that is guaranteed to be protected - it's all up to how well you can argue it in court, most probably against a high payed entertainment industry lawyer.
      With Fair Dealing, you probably won't get away with as much, but you can know 100% that you are protected if you fall within its definition.

    8. Re:No Fair Use by shmlco · · Score: 1

      If it's the same as the US license then up five different computers may be authorized at a time, and as many pods as you want...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    9. Re:No Fair Use by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I'd say "Fair Use" is better if it affords the ability to use a time-shifting media device or a portable music file player to play the the music that the owner paid for without paying yet another tax on each file. A system that falls short of that simply doesn't seem fair at all, whether rigidly or flexibly defined.

    10. Re:No Fair Use by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to this person's research into the Terms and Conditions, it's ambiguous whether buying a track from iTunes Oz grants you any CD burning privileges or not:

      You shall be entitled to burn and export Products solely for personal, non-commercial use.

      Any burning or exporting capabilities are solely an accommodation to you and shall not constitute a grant or waiver (or other limitation or implication) of any rights of the copyright owners of any content, sound recording, underlying musical composition or artwork embodied in any Product.

      So you're allowed to burn and export products; but you don't get any copyright waiver, and there's no such thing as fair use in Oz, so you're not allowed to burn or export. So ... are you allowed to burn CDs or not???

    11. Re:No Fair Use by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      Whats "rtbl?"

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    12. Re:No Fair Use by EireannX · · Score: 1

      Apple are doing nothing necessarily wrong, as they could claim that their software could be used to organise either legitimate digital music or our own music that we created. Even the iPod could go under that sort of (fairly specious) claim.

      iTunes itself isn't a problem, but Apple should be absolutely vulnerable to a lawsuit on the iPod front. IANAL of course. Before iTunes there was no legal way to get tunes onto an iPod in Australia. So they were supplying a product that not only encouraged a copyright violation, it almost required one to use. Even now I do not know if iTunes actualy grants a license for downloaded music to be copies onto an iPod or multiples thereof?

      Sure there are free audio elements out there which could be used legally on an iPod, but please don't try to convince me that the bulk of iPod users only have this stuff on their 'Pods

      After a quick perusal of the site, I cannot see the licence under which I would purchase songs from this store. However the site does have instructions on how to burn the songs to CD and copy them to an iPod. So unless the licence explicitly allows this, they could be as guilty as Kazaa of encouraging copyright infringement.

    13. Re:No Fair Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? OZ has stated that DVD region free players are legal, that companies may NOT penalise retailers for grey imports (which are legal by the way), what makes you think Apple is taking any risk selling licensed songs??

      The only risk is that with a pop'n of 20mill, how many are in the target audience? We don't have Tivo because we don't like TV that much. Most of us don't have pay/cable TV. Shows are crap. VCR more than enough.

    14. Re:No Fair Use by mmj638 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is true that there isn't a 'fair use policy' in Australia equivalent to the US. However, this has nothing to do with lack of Australian TiVO models. We have plenty of personal video recorders, both for free-to-air and pay (cable) TV. Most of those are more permissive than the TiVO - we have no broadcast flag issue here, and we can freely copy files from PVRs to computers via USB. As for why TiVO doesn't seem to be available here, you'd have to ask them about it. They probably have their own reasons for not producing an Australian model.

    15. Re:No Fair Use by YoungOzLawyer · · Score: 4, Informative
      How on earth is this moderated informative?

      Australia has no "Fair Use Policy" laws

      Howabout Div 3 of Part III of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)? - scroll down to the appropriate point on this page http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/0/244/to p.htm and have a read as to what is permitted as "fair dealing" under Australian law.

      so far there has been no test case

      This is just wrong. There have been cases about fair dealing and so forth since the Act was encated. Try this link http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinocgi.cgi/au?m ethod=boolean&rank=on&query=ca1968133%20s40 if you're really interested.

      This is the reason TiVO has not been introduced to Australia.

      I would suggest that there are several reasons TiVO has not been introduced, such as:

      - only 5 free to air channels
      - no free cable, encrypted pay TV
      - no electronic program guide
      - TV stations who persist on not running to time
      - different video standard (PAL not NTSC)

      It's certainly not the law - which hasn't prevented VCRs from flourishing (albeit they reisde in a somewhat grey area) - but more likely a question of economics.

      It is illegal to record any TV show that is not being broadcast live to air

      In fact its UNLAWFUL (but not illegal) to record a TV show at all (except in the case of fair dealing, and other exceptions I wont go into now) whether broadcast or not.

      But the distiction between unlawful and illegal is an important one. Unlawful means that the TV station or distributor or somebody has to come sue you for infringing upon their copyright. No jail time. Illegal means that somethings is a crime - the copyright holder just has to notify the cops, they can pick you up and you might face jail time (although now is not the time to go into criminal sentencing procedure).

      It is also illegal to rip cds to MP3

      Again, it's unlawful, but not illegal.

      Apple have finally taken the chance, which is good to see.

      I would suggest that this is not, in fact, a chance or risk for Apple. Australians are high per-capita purchasers of music. It is guaranteed profit which will also drive the iPod market with a legal source of downloads. Apple has only "waited" so long because the record labels in Australia have been absolute asses to deal with. Sony BMG is still not on board.

      Hopefully none of the recording labels will launch a lawsuit

      This is the bit that gets me most... it is the labels WHO ARE COOPERATING WITH APPLE TO ALLOW APPLE TO SELL THEIR MUSIC. The labels would be, in effect, SUING THEMSELVES. This will not happen.

    16. Re:No Fair Use by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Informative

      So ... are you allowed to burn CDs or not???

      The answer is although it's technically illegal, in practice nobody has ever been prosecuted in Australia for making personal copies. The reason is simple: if you're not standing on a street corner handing them out, who's going to know?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    17. Re:No Fair Use by catwh0re · · Score: 1
      This information is bit confused. The situation Australia faced was that because there was no iTMS there was no legal way to put music on iPods As all legal-downloadable music available in Australia used a DRM format other than the FairPlay used on iPods.

      It's true we have no "fair use" laws in Australia, as that was a test case which did not occur here. No companies here appear particularly worried by the continual illegal use of copyright material. We sell VCRs, DVD burning VR's, iPods, etc, etc. With only 20M population, we're hardly a threat in comparison to say China and many asian countries which we're near, which is far more blatant in their abuse of copyright. Additionally the sales of these electronic devices outweigh the damage they do to the industries through copyright abuse.

      Also before someone jumps up and down and says that Australia is backwards for not having strict Fair Use, take a moment to think that we also don't have the PATRIOT Act, the DMCA and few other goodies.

    18. Re:No Fair Use by truedfx · · Score: 1
      Unlawful means that the TV station or distributor or somebody has to come sue you for infringing upon their copyright. No jail time. Illegal means that somethings is a crime - the copyright holder just has to notify the cops, they can pick you up and you might face jail time (although now is not the time to go into criminal sentencing procedure).
      Do you have anything to back this up? By origins, by common usage, and by online dictionaries illegal just means unlawful, not necessarily criminal, so I'd be interested if you could show that to be wrong.
    19. Re:No Fair Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

      But if SONY thinks it can open its own store in Australia, it can think again. The Trade Practices Act (TPA) will spank them if they unreasonably refuse to supply to new entrants(Possible, but not against Apple).

      Maybe the Australian Govt punish this recalcitrance by revoking certain 'distributor' rights, for distributors that don't distribute, or practice international price collusion. For Australia to retain global parity, a novel solution would be to declare all Sony/BMG songs ripped as legal, until a lawful supply channel comes into existance. Is there not a clause in the .au copyright act that allows you to copy, when it cannot be supplied within so many days?

      The only certaintly is that states are missing out their 10% GST cut on all songs downloaded or bought elsewhere, caused by this brinkmanship. They won't make it up on physical sales either, as Amazon and the like are doing brisk business. What do you do with bad corporate netizens - you get out the stick.

    20. Re:No Fair Use by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      But the legislation is there for a test case if anyone is unfortunate enough to be picked on by a recording label.

      This started in June this year. The case hasn't attracted much media attention for some reason, but the bulk of the story can be found here;

      http://www.themusic.com.au/im_m/archive/2005/05053 1-457_guests.php

      Basically though, the former Manager of Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI), Michael Speck, repeatedly said that Australians would not be sued for non-commercial infringement of recording industry copyright. He resigned in May, and his successor appears much more interested in prosecutions.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    21. Re:No Fair Use by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      ...solely an accommodation to you...

    22. Re:No Fair Use by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      The answer is a legal yes. Some people here need to learn how to read more carefully.

    23. Re:No Fair Use by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      The licence does explicitly allow the burning of a purchased song to a CD, moving to unlimited iPods (only *to*, never *from*) and several other things besides. It's really not such a restrictive licence, and it's done with the full approval of the copyright holder.

      The point about Apple being sued before the iTMS was here in Australia is interesting, because it would require a case to be mounted against people for transferring music they *purchased* from one medium to another. The industry would have a very hard time finding someone to prosecute (as there's no trail to follow) and then would have to be prepared for a public backlash when they sue people who bought their CDs.

      There's little to no public concern over suing file-sharing pirates, but when they pick on people who are trying to be good, they'll suffer as a result.

      One interesting thing that would come of such a suit is that Sony are going to be as liable. They produce portable digital players in one division, with all the software you need to rip to ATRAC format. In another division they hold copyright to their music and guard it jealously. It's not in their interests to highlight the difference between those two divisions by suing people for doing what their products let them do.

      And they make CD and DVD burners in yet another division.

      The sooner we get some good Fair Use rights under copyright law, the better.

    24. Re:No Fair Use by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Fair call, I was only responding to the general lack of fair use provisions, not the implications of the license and how it affects users.

      Yes, good point that the iTunes license does allow personal use copies, and that does indeed override the fair use provisions in the legislation as long as (a) the terms of the license terms don't change, and (b) a user can provide proof of purchase.

      If the GPP is uncertain, the section in the license about itnot constituting a waiver of copyright refers to any copyright conditions not specifically referred to; in other words, the contract allows personal copies to be made because it says you can make personal copies, but anything else the copyright laws say you can't do is still illegal.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  9. The correct URL is... by Osrin · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:The correct URL is... by TheShadowHawk · · Score: 3, Informative

      No.. the correct URL for getting music is: http://www.allofmp3.com/. :)

      --
      Friends don't let Friends use Internet Explorer.
  10. Mistakes a plenty... by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Need I remark, as no doubt hordes of others will, that the URL is wrong, not to mention that for some odd reason windows users can't understand that the 'i' in Apple products is lower case; iMac, iPod, iMovie, and, in this case, iTunes. I get so damned fed-up of seeing Itunes, ITunes, itunes. Get it right. It's not hard. Mind you, neither is checking an URL.

    --
    The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    1. Re:Mistakes a plenty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never understood why mac users thing they are any better than windows users when they are just perpetuating the same moral evils.

      You sir, are a poor excuse for a human being. I get fed up with people like you complaining for little things like an i when moral standards are so beyond their grasp that they insult people who are exactly the same as they are in essence.

    2. Re:Mistakes a plenty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's customers are like no others -- a rich blend of the most sociologically elite with those seeking elegant, simple computing. ... Unlike users of Intel/Windows computers, a significant portion of Apple's users are active, exploratory, avant-garde and early adopters. The activities they enjoy are unique in the the way that they more often incorporate rich media such as video and music as well as more active prosumer behavior than many more passive Windows users.

      -- MetaFacts, Inc.


      With above-average household income and education levels, the Mac population [is] very attractive [intellectually as well as physically.]

      -- Nielsen/NetRatings (as quoted by C|NET)


    3. Re:Mistakes a plenty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh jeezus, wizard drongo you really have no Ilife do you? Its a commercial product, people spell it however they like. Most sane people really arent bothered when products are spelt incorrectly.

    4. Re:Mistakes a plenty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being Steve Jobs' cockjockey. There are more than enough of your kind already.

    5. Re:Mistakes a plenty... by NineNine · · Score: 3, Funny

      cAlm dOwn, fAnboy. aPple dOesn't rEad sLashdot. nO bRownie pOints fOr pRosletyzing hEre.

    6. Re:Mistakes a plenty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...for some odd reason, Wizard Drongo can't understand that the 'W' in Windows is upper case. Get it right. It's not hard.

    7. Re:Mistakes a plenty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfft - you can't even spell your own name correctly, wIzard dRongo. you spaz.

  11. Mysterious future. by Xenex · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From: xenex@opinionstick.com
    Subject: [DP] ITunes Australia Goes Live
    Date: 25 October 2005 12:32:57 PM
    To: daddypants@slashdot .org

    The link is dead.

    http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/iTunes_M usic_Store_comes_to_Australia/0,2000061733,3921879 8,00.htm seems to work though.

    The article comes up here just fine. Also, another interesting article: Apple: Our biggest competitor is P2P.
  12. iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by mattnuzum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a friend in India who says that he would use iTunes store if it were available, but because it isn't he simply uses peer-to-peer.

    As the iTunes store becomes available across the world it will help legitimize the online music industry. I think there are a lot of people in the world who don't have the option to go and buy the music they want to listen to. If they could, they would.

    Of course there are a lot of people who will jump at the opportunity to get something for free if they can, but no one is stopping these now, so it's not really the point. But if you give everyone the opportunity to pay for the music, many will. I think this is a good thing.

    Speaking of online music sales, I'm really looking forward to another price war. Come on guys, we need a legit iTunes competitor to drive down the prices!

    1. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by pintomp3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      itunes prices aren't based on competition, but what the riaa charges. apple doesn't make much on the store, thier money comes from ipod sales. unless the riaa is going to take a smaller cut from a competitor, the competitor isn't going to be able to charge much less than itunes. i believe riaa gets 71/99 per track. not much room to undercut there.

    2. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The best I can say is try sites by/for indie musicians, that cuts the oligopoly out of the loop. I can't name any myself, I buy their CDs and rip them myself, but I'm sure someone can chime in and give a good list.

    3. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price war is not going to happen. Apple has the overwhelming advantage of not needing to make a profit on the iTMS (just not make too much of a loss), and until someone can match that no one will be stupid enough to try to fight them there.

    4. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by evenSong · · Score: 0

      "Speaking of online music sales, I'm really looking forward to another price war. Come on guys, we need a legit iTunes competitor to drive down the prices!" Unfortunately, Apple is making the bare minimum off each song (something along the lines of a few cent I believe?). Without the recording industry allowing so, the prices will never be below Apple. And from the looks of it now, the recording industry only wants to see prices rise. One way I see prices being lower than Apple is if the recording industry forfeits lower prices to an iTunes competitior. That competitor will take a siginificant enough market share to erode Apple's dominance. In a sweeping move, the RIAA will ramp up prices, causing the collapse of digital music (of both iTunes and its competitor). Yeah right, it would never happen!

    5. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by Dechah · · Score: 1

      How do you propose that this alternative store provide tracks to the public when Apple will not licence their proprietary Fairplay DRM technology. Fairplay is the only DRM that will work with current iPods.

    6. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      very helpful tool to help not give money to riaa members
      http://www.magnetbox.com/riaa/

    7. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by Xaria · · Score: 1

      It's $1.69 in Australia.

    8. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      child porn is illegal in Australia

    9. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of online music sales, I'm really looking forward to another price war. Come on guys, we need a legit iTunes competitor to drive down the prices!

      Doesn't work like that. Apple isn't setting the prices for iTunes. The record labels are. And they'd love it even higher.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    10. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by Pope · · Score: 1

      Why would I go to some "indie" label's site when the music I know I want is on Apple's?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    11. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      So we obviously need a serious competitor to the members of the RIAA.

      *sigh*

      We're screwed, aren't we?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  13. MacRumors coverage & personal retraction by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Well, the ZDNet story is down (-1 Redundant), but MacRumors.com has one up.

    Ahead of schedule, iTunes now provides an Australia link in the iTunes Music Store.

    Songs are being offered for $1.69 and videos for $3.39 (AUS). Rumors for iTunes Australia have been long whispered. Cited reasons for the long delay have included resistance from music labels.

    According to the most recent reports, Sony BMG has not signed on to the iTunes Australia launch.

    Official launch is expected on October 25th at a media conference in Sydney.

    [Image of Australia Option in iTMS]


    Looks like it's not variable pricing as I thought it might have been. Thus, I hereby retract my "Crikey!"
    1. Re:MacRumors coverage & personal retraction by edgr · · Score: 1

      It seems that the record companies have taken this opportunity to increase prices. Apple wasn't going to budge on its US 99 cents, but with the new store came a chance to a money grab. US$0.99 is about AU$1.30

    2. Re:MacRumors coverage & personal retraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australians are used to getting the shaft. Meanwhile us Canadians are making out like bandits, it's 99 cents here!

    3. Re:MacRumors coverage & personal retraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like i said last time i read a comment, some of us are being shafted, while others got fed up and started shafting the music industry... obey copyright? never again you greedy fucks

  14. No Sony-BMG = No Good by 246o1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This lack of participation is a Very Bad Thing for anyone who likes to buy digital music easily online. As a consumer in Japan, I have been much-thwarted in my attempts to buy songs I hear on the radio or wherever. Though iTunes is very convenient, I haven't spent any money on iTunes Japan because it's so crippled. Obviously, I don't think this is good for either Apple or Sony-BMG, and hopefully they work something out eventually.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
    1. Re:No Sony-BMG = No Good by jcr · · Score: 1

      If you want it to happen, buy a share of Sony, then go to their next shareholder's meeting, and demand an explanation.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:No Sony-BMG = No Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find weird is that at MacWorld SF last January, Jobs said that Apple and Sony were really working together on many things (I assumed music as well). With Sony backing out on Japan and Aussie-land, do they really have an alliance? And other than Steve and that other Sony exec shaking hands, what have Sony and Apple done together?

    3. Re:No Sony-BMG = No Good by edgr · · Score: 1

      I think once it goes live here it probably won't take long for SonyBMG to get onboard. They were probably refusing to sign up in the hope that the store wouldn't get launched, but now that it has and the other labels start getting lots of sales I reckon Sony-BMG will realise they are losing sales by not being a part of it. That's if they make any sales at the $1.69 price point songs are at, anyway. That's over 25% more expensive than the US store (after converting the currency).

    4. Re:No Sony-BMG = No Good by iroll · · Score: 1

      You forget that Sony has severe and debilitating multi-personality disorder. Their left hand never knows what the hell their right is doing; they have all of these disparate divisions that fight turf wars when their markets overlap. The hardware people and the media people seem like they've been at odds many times.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    5. Re:No Sony-BMG = No Good by Technician · · Score: 1

      This lack of participation is a Very Bad Thing for anyone who likes to buy digital music easily online.

      Personaly I think this is a good thing. A line has been drawn in the sand. Now artists have a choice. CD's only, or CD's and online sales. When Sony BMG can't sign up new artists becaus they went elsewhere, the market will take care of itself.

      Sony-BMG will do or die.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:No Sony-BMG = No Good by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      I think once it goes live here it probably won't take long for SonyBMG to get onboard.

      Perhaps not: remember, Sony/BMG owns Napster. Australia is small enough a market to risk on an experiment in competition (though at this stage there's no sign they have that in mind, this is pure speculation).

      Also, as someone who was signed to BMG Australia (thanks to the rooArt buy out) and still knows people who work there, I can confirm they are a bunch of brainless luddites totally lacking anything even resembling a clue.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    7. Re:No Sony-BMG = No Good by kimba · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not: remember, Sony/BMG owns Napster.

      No it doesn't. It was purchased off Sony by Roxio, which then spun it out.

    8. Re:No Sony-BMG = No Good by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Heh, I missed that transaction (does anyone have a score card?). Still, it just emphasises my point about their lack of ability to spot technical trends.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  15. In other news, Madonna . . . by weighn · · Score: 4, Funny
    . . . has begun buying all her tracks from iTunes in an effort to stop others from downloading them.

    A spokeswoman from Warner, Maverick's parent company, declined to comment.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  16. Apple, how about NZ? by mdew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how about Itunes service that includes NZ too?

    --
    http://www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/
    1. Re:Apple, how about NZ? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      how about Itunes service that includes NZ too?

      Sure, how about record companies license their music for sale on iTunes in NZ? Not happening yet? Well, too bad.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Apple, how about NZ? by Audent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not sure if I should post a story I wrote but what the hey, it's /.

      http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/8515A04BC 338B24BCC2570A5000C063D

      with "hints" on how to circumvent the Aussie only rule. I'm sure you've already cottoned on to that.

      Apple NZ head said he doesn't know if/when Apple will even launch in NZ.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind
    3. Re:Apple, how about NZ? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Write to the record companies if you want it to happen. They're the sole reason why it took so long foriTMS Australia to go live.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Apple, how about NZ? by Slashcrunch · · Score: 1

      How about you just pop over to Australia and go on the dole (for the rest of the world a.k.a welfare)? While you are here you might be lucky enough to get an Aussie credit card. Too easy! C'mon, you know you want to. The Kiwi's I know (Hi Phil, Lee, Brent, Linda, David and Estelle!) are really just wanna-be Australians. Of course they all claim that they are far too attractive to ever be Aussies :)

      Seriously though, I've been waiting for this for quite some time. Glad to see its finally here. Hopefully the music industry will wake up, change their model, and make it easier for companies to license and sell music and video in other countries, but I imagine thats just wishful thinking.

    5. Re:Apple, how about NZ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Kiwi living in Australia and I was just able to make a purchase with my NZ credit card so I'm not sure if it's tied to your internet address but it may be worth a go. Also when in NZ you can purchase things like Quicktime from the Apple Australia store with an NZ credit card and it all works okay so purhaps a Kiwi in NZ may like to try it out.

  17. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by weighn · · Score: 4, Funny
    True fans don't rip off their artists.

    That's right, Jim. We leave that up to Sony.
    Badda-ching!! I got more, I got more...

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  18. Now iPod usage is legal! by ross.w · · Score: 2, Informative

    Until now, an iPod was an expensive paperweight unless you were prepared to infringe copyright, which meant that it was a copyright infringement tool, which meant that it had the same legal status as a X-Box or PS-2 mod chip.

    Didn't stop them selling them though.

    You have to remember that in Australia there are no fair use rights. You do not have the right to make copies of content for personal use or even backups. People do, and they are unlikely to be prosecuted, but it is illegal.

    Attempts to get this law changed have met with howls of protest from the likes of ARIA, and it probably won't happen until Digital Restrictions Mandating becomes universal so you won't be able to do it anyway.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    1. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by mattjb0010 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Until now, an iPod was an expensive paperweight unless you were prepared to infringe copyright, which meant that it was a copyright infringement tool, which meant that it had the same legal status as a X-Box or PS-2 mod chip.

      Actually mod chips are legal as they allow legal use of games/DVDs purchased overseas (and to restrict trade like that is in violation of the Trade Practices Act). Recent High Court decision here. But you're right on the iPod copyright infringement.

      You do not have the right to make copies of content for personal use or even backups.

      There are limited rights to make backup copies in some cases.

    2. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by Yakman · · Score: 1

      The only legal files you can put on your iPod are the ones you buy from ITMS though. Ripping a CD you bought to put on your iPod is still illegal.

    3. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Please remember that not all content is illegal to copy and distribute. There is plenty of content licensed for free distribution, and if you create your own content, you can always license it however you want. This is true of music too, not just software.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Until now, an iPod was an expensive paperweight unless you were prepared to infringe copyright ...

      Or unless you listened to MP3s of bands that published them online? Or if you bought music from AllOfMP3.com? (If that is legal in Australia)

    5. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by stuttering+stan · · Score: 1

      Here in the US, we have fair use rights. We also have the freedom to waive those rights, as many Americans have demonstrated. By accepting DRM (fair-play), Australians are now able to enjoy the convenience of iTunes. Win-Win.

    6. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by eosp · · Score: 1

      Or download.com , esp. http://download.com/reism

    7. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by Celsius+233 · · Score: 1
      Attempts to get this law changed have met with howls of protest from the likes of ARIA...

      Wow! Perhaps the Sydney Opera House is on our side?

      --
      Denham's Dentrifice, Denham's Dentrifice, Denham's Dandy Dental Dentrifice, Denham's Dentrifice Dentrifice Dentrifice.
    8. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      There were always other places to get legal files for your iPod, why you could have even made your own with Garage Band.

      Or you could have purchased DRM-free 192K VBR MP3s from emusic.com which keeps getting better by the day. Even with the least volume plan songs are only 25 cents each (33 Aussie cents!)

      Even if you use the Aussie iTMS check emusic first, you might be surprised.

    9. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please remember that the concept of "licensing" content has absolutely no legal standing whatsoever. The law is the law. If the law says that making copies is illegal, period end-of-paragraph, as it does here in Oz, then that "license" you point to with such enthusiasm is worth nothing at all. The moment the content creator decides to sue you for infringement, that "license" becomes an amusing but irrelevant piece of fiction.

      (Those idiots at "Creative Commons," in particular, need to grok this.)

  19. It's a shame there's no Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cause we won't be able to download the lastest Australian Idol releases...wait did I say shame?

  20. Much Rejoicing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're having a party here at Taylor's Sq Apple Store to celebrate and it's spilled out onto the street (as it does 'round here). There is much rejoicing in the streets! (so to speak) :D

  21. Important positions being taken here by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So Sony won't allow Apple to sell their tunes library, (about a quarter of the big five's recorded music), in Japan and now Australia/New Zeland. interesting. And ABC (Disney) is the only TV network willing to sell their TV Shows, Pixar only willing to debut a few (very cool) shorts.

    This is very important everyone. the content providers are VERY SCARED. First they were scared the medium wouldn't be popular enough to thwart file sharing, now they are scared it is SO POPULAR it will thwart their very role in distribution!

    I for one welcome the medium - The quality of "Lost" is totally acceptable for the price and download time, actual movies should only be provided in a hgher quality though.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:Important positions being taken here by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "This is very important everyone. the content providers are VERY SCARED. First they were scared the medium wouldn't be popular enough to thwart file sharing, now they are scared it is SO POPULAR it will thwart their very role in distribution!"

      Just to be clear: Apple is a reseller. Their competitors are not the record companies (which sell their product to the resellers) but other resellers like Amazon.com, Best Buy, Wal-Mart, indie record stores and anybody else who sells CDs or downloads. While the record companies do some direct business (record clubs, etc.), they largely rely on the retail channel. They pretty much always have.

      The reason why the record companies are scared of Apple is that they might become too big. Not because they will usurp the record companies "role," but because if one reseller gets too big, they call the shots. In the high tech industry, everybody has a love/hate relationship with Best Buy. For a lot of industries, the 500 lb. gorilla is Wal-Mart. When one reseller in a channel gets big enough, they can set the pricing that they pay, and manufacturers' margins get squeezed. This is why the record companies are doing the power play now with the "let's raise prices above $0.99" nonsense, because they foresee the day when Steve Jobs starts setting the wholesale prices.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    2. Re:Important positions being taken here by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      "The reason why the record companies are scared of Apple is that they might become too big. Not because they will usurp the record companies "role,""

      Yes and no. You are right Apple is a reseller of music but there is a subtle difference. Increasingly Apple are building tools for creating digital music and putting them in the hands of musicians for ever decreasing prices. You don't need a studio to create your DDD master anymore. When the day comes that the artists can create content for cheap, and Apple can provide them with a cheap distribution method, they have become something more than just a reseller.

      Artist takes his album to Apple (possibly created on a Mac with Logic and other tools) and says "Can you sell this for me?". Apple can take that one file and sell it an infinite number of times, no studio was required, no physical media was required, no record executive was required.

      Yes you are right that Apple may become too big for the label's liking, but the labels should also be scared that Apple are slowly but surely removing the need for physical media - unless you count the iPod of course ;-) If you don't think the record labels have a vested interest in physical media why do you think they are called "labels"?

    3. Re:Important positions being taken here by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      And ABC (Disney) is the only TV network willing to sell their TV Shows, Pixar only willing to debut a few (very cool) shorts.

      ABC was the only network even notified that Apple was going to start selling TV shows. I'm sure they are now in negotiations with the other networks as every waits to see if these things sell. As for Pixar, all they make are shorts and movies and realistically not that many people want to buy lower quality versions of movies online just yet. The video service is aimed at the instant gratification "I missed an episode" crowd.

  22. Suicidal pricing by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The pricing is just ridiculous. $1.69 per track for lossy recordings that, in Australia at least, you cannot necessarily legally burn to a CD or otherwise duplicate is simply outrageous.

    The record companies (I don't think this is Apple's fault) need to realise that they are competing with FREE on the Internet, not with each other. They also need to realise that when they have ZERO manufacturing costs they are going to need to reduce their prices accordingly.

    This is a perfect example of what a sheltered and monopoly/oligopoly dominated market Australia is. Other examples are air travel (two airlines), print media (one and a half newspaper conglomerates, most major cities have no media competition) and telecommunications (one major telco). The record company execs have obvious sat down and decided that they think Australia is sheltered enough that they can continue to screw us, iTunes or no iTunes.

    Send them a message: do not use this service. Buy a physical CD instead - it'll work out about the same price if you shop somewhere decent anyway (10-12 tracks = $17-$21 on iTunes, which is crazy). Alternatively, if you have a UK or US bank account, use the services in those countries to encourage Apple to put more pressure on the record companies in Australia.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Suicidal pricing by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are deeply, deeply missing the point.

      The only way to legally burn a CD from your digital music in Australia is the iTunes store. Because when you buy a song from iTunes, you get a license from the label via Apple to do certain things with the music. Fair use isn't necessary if you have a license from the owner.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    2. Re:Suicidal pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Buy a physical CD instead

      Even better buy a secondhand CD instead. Then the greedy bastards get no money.

    3. Re:Suicidal pricing by askegg · · Score: 1

      Mod up.

      --
      I don't make predictions, and I never will.
    4. Re:Suicidal pricing by Thrudheim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Send them a message: do not use this service. Buy a physical CD instead - it'll work out about the same price if you shop somewhere decent anyway (10-12 tracks = $17-$21 on iTunes, which is crazy)."

      No! The record labels would absolutely love for people to buy physical CDs. They want to keep that tired, old model going as long as possible. If you want to send a message, boycott them altogether.

    5. Re:Suicidal pricing by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      Buying a CD, LP or tape, going to be cheaper! I have seen some older Australian music for 8-10 bucks a CD in places like Sanity (chain) or the Muses, in just the last few weeks. Buying those digitally would double the price. Nutty.

    6. Re:Suicidal pricing by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      The other thing being, if they have an oz store with quite a lot of Australian music, are those songs then available via the US or UK versions (for those people with credit cards from there)?

    7. Re:Suicidal pricing by skingers6894 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Send them a message: do not use this service. Buy a physical CD instead"

      Actually that is EXACTLY the message they want...

      IF you want to send them a message go and buy DRM-free 192K VBR MP3s from emusic.com for 33 Aussie cents each.

    8. Re:Suicidal pricing by GaryPatterson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The price is steep compared to the US, but the message should not be to stay with physical media. We're seeing more and more "copy-controlled" discs these days, and they just don't rip so easily.

      Also, despite parallel imports being around for ten years or so, I still see new release discs at $25-$35, much higher than the iTMS album price of $16.99. I think the music industry would absolutely *love* it if only physical media were sold and the Internet distribution model failed.

      I'm going to give iTMS a good go and buy music from there. I'm no audiophile, and I think the sound quality is very good (except for some music with higher-pitched harmonics, but that's not so common).

      I'll also investigate other options like emusic, which I'd never heard of before this topic came up. I absolutely won't buy anything in WMA format though (not so hot on the iBook), so my options are not huge.

    9. Re:Suicidal pricing by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      Precisely - I picked up Origin of Symettry by Muse for $9 the other day at JB HiFi... on iTunes it would presumably cost me double that.

      And frankly if CDs are about $5-$10 I am very willing to pay that for a physical object with liner notes etc and lossless sound.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    10. Re:Suicidal pricing by shark72 · · Score: 1

      " The pricing is just ridiculous."

      "Send them a message: do not use this service."

      The cool thing about a free market economy is that if the pricing really is ridiculous, then you won't have to implore people not to use it -- they'll stay away on their own.

      If, in a few months, we see headlines like:

      AUSTRALIAN ITUNES COMPLETE FAILURE Citizens prefer barbecuing giant shrimp, survey says

      ...then you're correct that the pricing is ridiculous.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    11. Re:Suicidal pricing by Grail · · Score: 1
      10-12 tracks = $17-$21 on iTunes, which is crazy


      You're American, aren't you?

      Albums in Australia sell for $20-$30 in local currency. So getting the whole album for $21 is actually a saving, if you're prepared to accept the fact that when your computer dies, your music collection goes with it...
    12. Re:Suicidal pricing by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      1. No, I live in Australia and always have.

      2. Wherever you buy CDs, try shopping around. You don't need to pay more than $20-25 for anything that's been out a few months, or $10-20 for anything older unless it's particularly rare.

      3. Half my point was that at least with a CD you get something tangible. As you point out digital media files are inherently vulnerable to hard disk failures etc.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    13. Re:Suicidal pricing by pioneerX · · Score: 1

      UK pricing @ £0.8/track is as bad as Aus. Particularly when the rest of Europe pays 1.

    14. Re:Suicidal pricing by martinX · · Score: 1

      Try JB Hi-Fi. You'll get a lot of albums for $15. Wow Sight and Sound is another place to try.

      For brand new top 40 type stuff, sure $20 minimum. But for everything else you can get a better price.

      Annoyingly, I've seen albums on the AU iTMS for $17.99. All the Massive Attack stuff, for instance. I thought the album price was capped at $16.99.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  23. link works fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    link works fine for me

  24. no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incredible news. Will people ever realize that iTunes sucks?
    I'd rather pay for 8 tracks before iTunes 128 bkpb.

  25. New Zealanders Feel Left Out... by Traegorn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    New Zealanders who feel left out are apparently lying to Apple and getting songs anyway...

    1. Re:New Zealanders Feel Left Out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But New Zealand is just another State of Australia anyway :)

    2. Re:New Zealanders Feel Left Out... by martinX · · Score: 1

      Those lying bloody kiwis. How low can they stoop? Pretending to be Aussies!

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    3. Re:New Zealanders Feel Left Out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay, everyone knows that Bondi is the real capital of New Zealand .. :)

    4. Re:New Zealanders Feel Left Out... by Helish · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that it's the new Pom capital.

    5. Re:New Zealanders Feel Left Out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. itunes video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they release Lost episodes, will they be same eps from the US? or delayed?

    1. Re:itunes video by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      as much as id love it if they bypassed the network stations, who quite usualy can shows or shift em to late night timeslots, so i could just download the new stuff when its out and im reading bout it as opposed to waiting 12 months or so.

      i dont think that they could get away with it though :(

      but if they do it for movies. hell yeah. No more wating till the movies are on frigging dvd in the US before they even turn up here god damn it.

      it took freaking 4 years for hellboy to coem out over hear at the movies after the US got the DVD... and they did it cause they didnt percive there to be a market for it. then when it was released it scored big. morons.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    2. Re:itunes video by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If not all the music companies can grow a brain here, then a fair chance none of the tv companies will!

  27. Re:Suicidal pricing -Check the TOS by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Informative
    Before jumping to conclusions, check out the Australian store Terms of Sale:http://www.apple.com/au/support/itunes/legal/ policies.html>iTMS AUS TOS.
    CONTENT USAGE RULES
    Your use of the music downloaded from iTunes Music Store (the "Products") is conditional upon your prior acceptance of the terms of this Agreement.

    You shall be authorized to use the Product only for personal, non-commercial use, and not for redistribution, transfer, assignment or sublicence, to the extent permitted by law. For details of your rights and restrictions on your right to use the Products, see:
    www.copyright.org.au; or
    www.ipaustralia.gov.au/ip/copyright.shtml; or
    www.copyright.asn.au.

    You shall be authorised to use the Product on five Apple authorised computers.

    You shall be entitled to burn and export Products solely for personal, non-commercial use.

    Any burning or exporting capabilities are solely an accommodation to you and shall not constitute a grant or waiver (or other limitation or implication) of any rights of the copyright owners of any content, sound recording, underlying musical composition or artwork embodied in any Product.

    You agree that you will not attempt to, or encourage or assist any other person to, circumvent or modify any software required for use of the Service or any of the Usage Rules, or interfere with, remove or alter any rights management information on the Products.

    The delivery of a Product does not transfer to you any commercial or promotional use rights in the Product.
    So basically, you have the same usage rules as the other music stores. Please don't spread FUD.

    I agree with most of the rest of your post but if you really want to send them a message, stop buying music all together and send in letters declaring your boycott. Buying CD's is not going to send them any sort of message other than you like their current business practices in general.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  28. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Funny

    As recording artist "Tool" noted

    I love "Tool." He's hot.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  29. Songs at AU$1.69? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    And here I thought that US$1.00 was more like AU$1.33.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Songs at AU$1.69? by minorproblem · · Score: 1

      1.69*0.74(current exchange rate)~= 1.25 american so we can always expect to pay 25% more?

    2. Re:Songs at AU$1.69? by dilby · · Score: 1

      Yes but look at iTunes UK
      79p is approx 1.86 AUD

      --
      This post patent pending.
    3. Re:Songs at AU$1.69? by noisymime · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the wonderful world of Apple's global market pricing scheme. As the product gets more expensive the gap widens.
      Eg:
      30gb Video iPod: $US299 (~$AU399). Apple.com.au's price: $AU449
      Entry level Mac Mini: $US499 (~$AU665). Apple.com.au's price: $AU799
      15" PowerMac: $US1999 (~$AU2665). Apple.com.au's price: $AU3199

      And so on and so forth.....

    4. Re:Songs at AU$1.69? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Well, the game industry certainly agrees with that figure. I can import games from the US and save around 10-15% of the cost even after counting the shipping. Funnily enough, DVDs are reasonably cheap.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    5. Re:Songs at AU$1.69? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      excuses such as;
      * oh its the shipping costs - $1200 per container from singapore - 10000 ipods
      * oh its import duty and taxes - well subtract usa taxes then
      * oh its a smaller market - yeah we have 5m old farts and 3m kids, leaving behind 12m real customers? of those 50% or poor phucks?

      back in 1999 it was cheapr by $2000 to fly to usa and back to buy $7000 powerbooks for $3000

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  30. Lost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we get episodes of Lost through this? Are they crappy Ipod Video resolution or hdtv or what? (yeah i'm on thepiratebay but they deserve a few bucks)

  31. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the dude from Tool also wrote
    "i sold my sole to make a record"
    "then you brought one"

    Yes true fans don't ripe off the band.
    Which is why true fans support CDBaby, iTunes, and the little independant Record store so the next gen of Artists can be free of the crude we know today.

    Some Day down the track we will have the market driven by the culture not a culture driven by marketing like we have now.

    That day will come, the record compaines will disappear. The fans don't need them anymore, the artists don't need them anymore.

    The only ones left are the techinical support people but i'm sure they will learn how to break free soon enough.

    --
    "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
  32. We're paying more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    $1.69* 0.7482 (exchange rate) = 1.2645 (4dp) we pay 26% more than what Americans do for each song.

    1. Re:We're paying more by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      The American prices don't include tax. When you subtract the GST from the Australian prices, they're $1.54 each, so only 15 % more than the American prices.

    2. Re:We're paying more by tabbser · · Score: 1

      That's OK, because it appears you pay 26% less for your education "than what the americans do".

  33. Stock in Japan by 246o1 · · Score: 1

    Most shareholder meetings in Japan are traditionally held at the same time (late June), so as to dilute the power of the shareholders who shares in multpile companies. Of course, I don't have the resources to buy the amount of stock it would take to make Sony responsive to my concerns. While corporations here are not responsive to shareholders, in comparison to America, anyway, they do often respond well to consumer pressure. Though the music industry has been an exception, I have faith they will come around someday.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
    1. Re:Stock in Japan by jcr · · Score: 1

      I don't have the resources to buy the amount of stock it would take to make Sony responsive to my concerns.

      In the USA, owning a single share entitles you to attend the shareholder's meeting. Is that not the case in Japan?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Stock in Japan by BJH · · Score: 1

      It's the same, but you're talking about wo different things.
      You're saying he has the right to attend the shareholders' meeting.
      He's agreeing with you, but saying that unless you own a significant block of stock, there's no way Sony's going to listen to you.

    3. Re:Stock in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan, you can attend the shareholders meeting if you have a single share. You need a shit load more than that to make any official requests though. That includes questions.

      That doesn't stop you from shouting out demands during the meeting, which is exactly why the majority of all major companies in Japan hold their shareholder meetings on the exact same day. That way, the stock-yakuza can't attend all the shareholder meetings and disclose secrets or other blasphemy that the company doesn't want shareholders to know about. (It's essentially black mail. Pay up, or I attend the shareholder meeting! And as is the case with most blackmail, there's incentive not to call the cops.)

      In the U.S. it's probably hard to understand, but in Japan, for some odd reason shareholder's interest is NOT that high on the list. As a matter of fact, a lot of companies find it damning that a shareholder would actually expect to have any say in the way the company works. Recently there have been a series of TOB's over here, and there have been a slew of comments that "it's not fair, and un-Japanese". I called bullshit, but not everyone agrees with me. Interestingly, public opinion is starting to change as they realize that stock is more than a traded commodity, and that companies should be dealing with demands, or not sell their stock at all.

  34. I want to DL Oz music! by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting a LONG time for this. I want to download some songs from some Oz artists (that I can currently only buy from overseas online) but not all of them are available in the iTunes US and I can't buy them from iTunes Australia. Acts in and around Oz like Little Birdy, Youth Group, Scribe, Clare Bowditch, Eskimo Joe, Gyroscope, Grinspoon, and more aren't available to the US yet. Granted, I think they may still be adding songs, which means they probably just haven't added them to the US store. But I wish they'd upload the damn things before they tell us about them...

    1. Re:I want to DL Oz music! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I very briefly looked at your website and it seems you're in the US? How do you know about such good Aussie bands?
      Just curious :)

    2. Re:I want to DL Oz music! by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at those prices, the only reason to buy from them is if you cannot find the stuff anywhere else, even secondhand. Particularly older music not released on CD, any chance any of that becomes digital?

    3. Re:I want to DL Oz music! by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

      Triple J

    4. Re:I want to DL Oz music! by shenki · · Score: 1

      yeah, go Gyroscope!

      --
      It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one!
    5. Re:I want to DL Oz music! by aussiedood · · Score: 1

      Amazon seems to have a pretty good catalog of Grinspoon stuff. Sure it's not a download, but once you have the CD you can RIP and encode in any format you like without any DRM. I didn't bother searching for any of the other bands you listed, but I am sure some are available, if not there's always aussie online stores that will gladly ship to the US.

    6. Re:I want to DL Oz music! by thatoneguy_jm · · Score: 1

      I believe that Youth Group is now listed in the iTunes US store - however, I don't believe that they have their entire discography quite yet. Hopefully soon...

  35. Add tax (10%) + Frenchs Forest staff BBQ margin by michaeldot · · Score: 1
    And here I thought that US$1.00 was more like AU$1.33.

    Yes, it is, but you've got to add tax (GST = 10%) too which brings it to about $1.45.

    I think $1.50 per song would have been a nicer price point, but I suppose they are hedging in case the Aussie dollar tanks again if/when the economy takes a hit from rising inflation - it's harder to go up once the price is set.

    There's also the overhead of running a high bandwidth store in a backward country (whose "leading" technology company, Telstra can't even manage a shareholder meeting webcast without screwing up).

    Still, I bought 20 songs this morning. Though I'm pissed I can't buy Meat Loaf's Bat Out of Hell as a single song only. Grumble...

    1. Re:Add tax (10%) + Frenchs Forest staff BBQ margin by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      You can't buy a single song from Bat Out Of Hell? That is asinine. I saw that CD at JB for 7 bucks a few months ago. Obviously premium product they want to keep at a high price. Not!

  36. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

    the dude from Tool also wrote "i sold my sole to make a record" "then you brought one"

    "Young man, when I was a boy, we had to sell off the bottoms of our shoes to make records, goddammit! And now they're letting any old idiot do it for the price of their soul!"

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  37. interview CD Baby behind-the-scenes iTunes AU by linuxbaby · · Score: 4, Informative
    My company is one of the main providers of music to iTunes worldwide.

    Knowing that iTunes Australia was launching, I did an interview with AppleTalk Australia that tells a little bit more behind-the-scenes stuff, in case you're interested.

    I'm glad this is finally up-and-running. Australia has a great independent music scene (as I spoke more about in previous Slashdot comment).

    1. Re:interview CD Baby behind-the-scenes iTunes AU by biovoid · · Score: 1

      Any word on when the Australian CDBaby office will open?

  38. Next up = ? by lampiaio · · Score: 0

    Which country is likely to be next? South Korea, perhaps?

    I wouldn't be surprised if Apple were to launch an "iTMS Mauritius" or some other unexpected country, tho.

    --
    My other account has mod points.
  39. Re:Suicidal pricing -Check the TOS by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

    Ok, point taken about the licensing, but nevertheless it is somewhat restrictive and there are parts of the Copyright Act that cannot be waived by license (e.g. anti-circumvention technology provisions). And fair use, of course, is not a feature.

    Irrespective my main issue is with the pricing of what amounts to a small amount of data. Their costs now amount to the cost of recording and the cost of transferring 3-5MB per song, plus some costs for marketing, yet the price is arguably higher than ever.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  40. Big holes in the Aust iTunes catalogue by awful · · Score: 1

    No Elvis, no Beatles, no Clash (a lot of people might not care about that last one, but last time I checked there were a lot of fans of the first two).

    1. Re:Big holes in the Aust iTunes catalogue by rogueuk · · Score: 1

      apple is never going to be allowed to sell the beatles so it's not like the australians are the only ones missing out on them

    2. Re:Big holes in the Aust iTunes catalogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Catherine Britt! (pic at http://www2.pair.com/wacky/kasey/8big.jpg) Australia's hottest young female country singer, and she's not on there. I think I will go kill myself now.

    3. Re:Big holes in the Aust iTunes catalogue by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

      No Elvis, no Beatles, no Clash

      you forgot Less songs than others. Lame.

  41. I know a genuine sorny when I see it by E8086 · · Score: 1

    It's Sony's loss. iTunes is a popular proven distrobution method, it seems Sony misses that or this is their way of whining about songs being "only" $0.99. They're already getting 100% of the profits from iTunes, Apple is getting a few cents for the operating costs of hosting and transfering the files. Oh, that's right, they want their 100% profit to be higher, maybe songs for $2.49
    How about why is a 3-4min song 99c while 44min of audio and video only $1.99?
    yes, I know the tv episode was origionally aired with commercials. If 44min of audio and video is $2 then a song 1/11 as long and no video should be at most 1/22 of that.

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
  42. Ok, I'm dead by ynotds · · Score: 1
    Was it suicidal for me to spend the morning buying ten unrelated tracks:
    • I Want to Know What Love Is: Foreigner
    • Nights In White Satin: The Moody Blues
    • Reckless (Don't Be So...): Australian Crawl
    • Original Sin: INXS
    • Nature Boy: Nat King Cole
    • If: Bread
    • Exodus: Ferrante and Teicher
    • Day-O (The Banana Boat Song): Harry Belafonte
    • With a Little Help from My Friends: Joe Cocker
    • Memory: Debbie Byrne
    for $A16.90 the lot? To me that's a lot better value that I could otherwise get without leaving my chair, albeit with maybe a 50% hit rate amongst the tracks I went looking for and plenty left on my priority list to spend a similar amount on in future months.

    (The prospect of iTMS was the only reason I relented and got a credit card a couple of years ago, so I could even make an argument that it has cost me over $A1,000 per track in the interim, but that is another story.)

    I'm certainly glad its finally here and can only hope the back catalogue improves further with time.

    And maybe the claim that iTMS Australia has been launched with "over a million tracks" should be taken with a grain of salt as there were two or more almost identical versions offered of most of the tracks I searched for, reflecting their repackaging in various collections. That most likely also reduces the value of any popularity stats iTMS might provide.

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
    1. Re:Ok, I'm dead by phil1984 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if parent wanted to steal, he could have just used Limewire

  43. No "Just For You" feature, but a workaround by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Aussie store currently doesn't have the Just For You feature, but if you go to the home page and switch to the US store using the popup menu at the bottom, it appears.

    (You have to switch back if you want to buy a song later.)

  44. It's slow and NO paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't bother with ITMS.au, it's slower than molasses. In fact it's so slow it makes dial up look positively snappy. I think they have employees that read the incoming HTTP requests out, and someone writes it down, walks over to the library catalogue of songs they have... works out the search results, writes it down, hands it back to the data entry employee (there is just one, who is really busy) who then types up the results in HTML and sends it back out the 300 baud modem to me. It is faster to find and download a song over p2p than it is to see if ITMS even has the song.

    And no PayPal, despite there being a PayPal.com.au site. *sigh*

    1. Re:It's slow and NO paypal by tabbser · · Score: 1

      Count yourself luck there is no paypal.
      PayPal are a bunch of lying theiving scumbags.

  45. Get an overseas bank account by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have been downloading from iTunes to Australia for well over a year, because I have a UK bank account as well as an Australian one. The choice from the UK store is probably better than the Australian offering at the moment anyway. Apple doesn't care where your IP address is from, they only check that your credit card is registered in the territory that the music store is located in. This seems to work around the regional disaster that is the record industry quite neatly. In fact, I'd say it makes a mockery of the whole regional distribution model, and really it's about time that the record industry realised that it needs to wake up and smell the coffee as far as globalisation is concerned. As for any tracks I still can't get legally? Well, there's always Acquisition...

  46. BkPB? by VaticDart · · Score: 1
    What the bloody hell is that? Big kicks per beat? Bleached kelp prefers barbie? Block-rocking-beat korns per barstool? Bland kilts per pebble? Bliss knifes personable benches?

    If you're going to troll, at least get your acronyms straight.

  47. give it some time... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I agree, it appears Sony has decided to opt out of the store from now on.

    But as to the TV/movie providers, give it some time.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  48. TiVo Down Under by violet16 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a few different reasons behind the absence of TiVo in Australia. One is that if they can't make a profit in the UK, they're unlikely to here. Another is that the Australian courts have deemed raw TV guide data to be IP (Telstra vs Desktop Marketing), so you can't produce one without the networks' permission. There's no way in hell they'll give that to a PVR manufacturer, and without TV guide data, PVRs aren't so useful.

    The same issue makes it a little harder to set up something like MythTV; you need to use slightly dodgy open/volunteer TV guide data or (technically) break the law with a Perl script that scrapes it from the networks' web sites.

  49. rtbl by tpv · · Score: 1
    See sllort's journal.

    Not sure if that's the particular instance of rtbl'ing that the grandparent is referring to, but (s)he's almost certainly refering to the slashcod $rtbl flag.

    --
    Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    1. Re:rtbl by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      It was indeed 'the post'. I considered writing up a quick summary, unfortunately it's all gone gray and fuzzy as the years pass. I'm pleased to see that it is recorded somewhere for future generations to read!

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  50. Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Australia!!!!

  51. $114.99 AUD for one audiobook file by mex666 · · Score: 0

    $114.99 AUD for "Harry Potter and the order of the pheonix"? I bought the big hardback version of the book for $24 AUD at K-Mart. Oh and only $434 AUD for the whole set! I understand that they are long files, and audiobook on cassette or cd is a big box of media, but WE have to pay for the bandwidth to download these big files, and in Australia we have small download limits because of our monopolised Communications Industry. Some plans here have .14c per MB downloads.

    1. Re:$114.99 AUD for one audiobook file by tabbser · · Score: 1

      $49.95 here for the order of the phoenix and $249 for the complete potter.

      I've recently realized that the audibooks I was buying from iTunes were less than optimal.
      I bought all the twilight zones and several physics books, including the fabric of spacetime.

      I discovered that many of them can be rented on CD from BlackStoneAudio.com for 30 days at a time for about $18
      The Dracula I was itching to buy from iTunes ($50) is $18 to rent on CD from BlackStone
      It also turns out that my local library has a bunch of audio books on CD to loan out.

      Maybe these suggestions can help you source it for a more reasonable cost.

  52. iTunes Australia by astonishedelf · · Score: 1

    I predict that in 10 years or less, iTunes will achieve an almost total lock on digital content and we will all be bitching about Apple as opposed to Microsoft.

  53. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize DRM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it will help legitimize the online music industry

    It will help legitimize DRM! We don't need more extortion schemes, we need Freedom!

    Do not support this. It's bad, even when Apple does it, mmkay? Slippery slopes and all that...

  54. Re:Apple, how about NO DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's more interesting. How come otherwise sane and smart people suddenly swallows this crap just because it's packaged in a shiny box? It's a slippery slope here people, and if you accept this, then further restrictions will follow.

    Freedom to use your legal music anyway you wish to is a must! Boycott DRM!

  55. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

    I see the error of my ways oh noble coyote.
    Given that it is probably quickier to google the lyrics to cut and pasta, than to try and remember them correct spelling and all.

    The thought for the moment as i read your reply.

    "Wasting time is an important part of living."

    --
    "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
  56. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

    "Wasting time is an important part of living."

    Well, given that both our user ID's are in the 700000 range, they're not by any means the highest here, and not everyone registers, I'd say that point is well proven. Show me anyone that hasn't wasted a bit of time here or there and I'll show you someone that was stillborn.

    I'm not a spelling nazi, and don't normally care, and really don't even here, but the thought of an older version of Maynard spitting out that line at an up-and-comer crossed my mind, and I just had to post it. No offense was intended, although you'd not be the first not to like my humor. Still, seeing one of my favorite Tool songs posted here and actually being on topic caught my attention.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  57. Pity They Don't Accept Visa Debit Cards by Grail · · Score: 1

    ... otherwise I'd already have bought the entire collection of Nat King Cole.

    But they lose. I'll be buying it on CD, if I can find someone who stocks it tomorrow. Otherwise my urge to buy his collection will dissipate in about three days...

    1. Re:Pity They Don't Accept Visa Debit Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, well, I've got a Visa debit card and I've been happily buying since Tuesday (yes, in Sydney Australia).
      Maybe you should try again.

    2. Re:Pity They Don't Accept Visa Debit Cards by pete_yandell · · Score: 1

      My Westpac (Bank of Melbourne) Visa debit card works just fine.

  58. LOL by craznar · · Score: 1

    That's about it.

    So, I can buy some songs, as long as they are popular, but not too popular and recent and local and have the letter B in the title and {etc} and as long as I want to pay more than geting a real CD.

    Yes.... definitely a LOL.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  59. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

    Hey I'm guilty as charged for time wasted here.
    (although more of it should be used proof-reading ;-))

    I thought your humour was good, much the same image came to mind.
    Certainly no offence was taken for the novel correction.
    It's one of Favourite songs. It comes to mind anytime there is discussion of record companies.
    Been itching for and chance to use it as a quote.

    --
    "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
  60. Fair Dealing is NOT Fair Use by rohanl · · Score: 1

    Australia has no "Fair Use Policy" laws

    Howabout Div 3 of Part III of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)? - scroll down to the appropriate point on this page http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/0/244/to p.htm and have a read as to what is permitted as "fair dealing" under Australian law.

    Australia does not have Fair Use. What we have is Fair Dealing. Read the above link for all the details, but in summary, Fair Dealing sets out specific cases where copying is allowed:

    • Research or study
    • Criticism or Review
    • Reporting News

    How do any of the above allow you to burn a copy of a CD?

  61. Just bought a $20 credit and downloaded... by Shanep · · Score: 1

    Crowded House - Recurring Dream - the Very Best Of

    Is it my imagination, or is the music from the iTunes Store a little flat with poor channel separation?

    Since I own an iRiver H340, I'm just going to keep buying cheap CD's from K-Mart, Target and Big-W then LAME them, given that I can't tell the difference between my LAME MP3's, my iRiver will play them and I will always have a raw backup to fall back on.

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?