Slashdot Mirror


Is Your Office Haunted?

WormholeFiend writes "You know Halloween is around the corner when websites like Forbes.com releases a story wondering about the supernatural. From the article: 'Maybe the spirits have decided that spooky mansions and creepy battlefields are passé. Maybe they want to cash in on the glamour of corporate life. Maybe they just wanted the sushi.'" Anyone out there have any encounters with a spiritual Milton?

266 comments

  1. there is some good advice in article by yagu · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article didn't shed much light on paranormal experience nor did it even lead me to be much more curious. In my opinion it's mostly goofiness.

    However, the article did contain a gem, and delivered as a parting word of wisdom:

    One paranormal investigator in North Carolina, no fan of Microsoft's (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people ) operating system, says he has had to explain to people "that if you're running Windows, you have a much bigger problem than ghosts.

    Nicely put, and 'nuff said.

    1. Re:there is some good advice in article by RLiegh · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, it's more like "If you use windows, make sure you have the right ghost!"

    2. Re:there is some good advice in article by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Paranormal investigator".

      Is that the backup choice if the application as 7-11 clerk is turned down?

    3. Re:there is some good advice in article by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Ghosts?? OHHH. I thought you said 'goats'. See, website...Goatsex...I'm NOT excited... Oh hell. Never mind. Ok, let's not go there. (Does this show up on my resume?)

    4. Re:there is some good advice in article by Petersson · · Score: 1

      that if you're running Windows, you have a much bigger problem than ghosts
      Right. Zombies are worse than ghosts.

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
  2. The mainstream media says nothing of value. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't look to the mainstream for anything of value about any subject.

    They're just in it to put cash in their pockets.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by sydb · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is some value in it; it tells you what a significant portion of the population are believing. That's scarier than their profits. Wooooh! (Do ghosts go "Wooooh!" all over the world or just here in Little Britain?)

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    2. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think fanboys go 'woooh', and ghosts go 'booo' :P

    3. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by generic-man · · Score: 1
      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't look to the mainstream for anything of value about any subject.
      They're just in it to put cash in their pockets."

      I can't believe it's necessary to even mention that.

    5. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by rarity · · Score: 1

      Do ghosts go "Wooooh!" all over the world or just here in Little Britain?


      Just the English ones. French ghosts go "Le Wooooh!", German ones go "Ich Wooooh!"... should I carry on?

    6. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      They all go Wooooh, but it depends on what the ghost is doing. If it's just running around the place, or moving through your subfloor and into the ceiling, it will probably go Woooh. But if it's hiding in the corner and wants to scare you, it goes Booo!

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    7. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by ErikZ · · Score: 1
      There is some value in it; it tells you what a significant portion of the population are believing.


      Actually, that's not the case. It's usually two things:

      1. What they want people to believe, to encourage more people to think the same through herd mentality.
      2. Anything interesting. Just because they find some guy running for office under the Nazi party, doesn't mean there's a goundswell of support for Nazis. It means he's nuts.
      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    8. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite are Chinese ghosts. They wear elaborate clothing, have long, sharp fingernails, and hop towards you instead of just floating or magically appearing. They're probably the least scary to westerners.

    9. Re:The mainstream media says nothing of value. by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. I think zombies with claws are pretty scary.

  3. Sure Haunted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Well I imagine that many offices are "haunted" with the high rate of mental illness in IT and people who just generally make shit up.

    1. Re:Sure Haunted by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Those are not ghosts in the hallways at work, those are peoples lives that they gave up when they went to work there. The physical shells you see lumbering through the hallways are those that lost their souls to the corporate grinder. Working many hours of overtime, being on call 24x7 for months if not years at a time have resulted in hundreds of IT works being lost to the niether world.

      Grieve for these lost souls, they are lost to the world forever.

    2. Re:Sure Haunted by poolmeister · · Score: 1

      In one of my previous jobs, I did actually have an ghostly encounter in a server room when I was working for a major government agency in London just on the south bank of the Thames.
      Our server & comms rooms were in the basement of the building and these where the only functional rooms down there.
      I went to do the backup tape duty as usual when as I stood writing out some labels someone whistled right in my ear, I actually felt the puff of air against the side of my head.
      I was the only person in that part of the building and only two other co-workers had access to those rooms and they where on the 4th floor. It's odd really because it didn't panic as I would've thought I would in that situation, apart from the initial shock of it happening which made me jump out of my skin!
      I did leave the room pretty quickly after I realized that it wasn't a prank and I was the only one there... the pisser was I had to go back to finish the tapes.

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    3. Re:Sure Haunted by ivoras · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Something like that happens a lot to me. Actually, it happened just now when I finished reading your story...

      Creepy, huh?

      I must admit, I see a lot of horror movies and read lots of horror books, so I got pretty distrubed when this started happening. It sometimes scares me even now.

      But, the cause is sadly mundane: disk drives spinning down! Disks drive usually spin very fast ant the frequency of vibrations they produce are above human hearing levels. As they spin down, they pass quickly through the hearing range producing a sound like somebody is whistling on their breaths end... a "fading" whistle of sorts. Many operating systems today can be setup to spin down disks after periods of inactivity, so there - if you're close enough to the case, you hear a single solitary, "sad-sounding" whistle. I believe the "puff of air" in this case is just imagination, as we "know" that all whistles are produced by puffing air :)

      (btw. this is not guesswork - I checked: at least one of my disks produces a sort-of-whistling sound when it spins down and the case is open so the sound is more audiable)

      --
      -- Sig down
    4. Re:Sure Haunted by poolmeister · · Score: 1

      An impressive display of dullard ignorance...
      How on earth would a single disk drive spinning down amongst 50 servers (300+ disks) located 10 feet away emulate a sharp human whistle directed into my ear?

      I too didn't beleive such things could happen until it happened to me.

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    5. Re:Sure Haunted by ivoras · · Score: 1
      This happens to me when I'm *close* to the machine. For example, when I'm walking by a machine. The thing that makes it exceptional is that sometimes you can walk across the server room and just happen to be there, in the right place at the right time, close enough to hear a drive spinning down.

      Of course, if you are sitting at a desk and there's no machines near you (my home computer case is half-opened, it's around 1m from where I'm sitting and I can hear perfectly when disks are spinning down) then it's probably something else :)

      --
      -- Sig down
  4. Yes it is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With this crazy looking thing: Jack-o-lantern computer

    It has a built in motherboard, case fans, dvd burner, internet, wireless keyboard and mouse, the works. Pretty powerful for just being a pumpkin IMO... They even posted the instructions on how to build your own if you are so inclined Heh..

    1. Re:Yes it is! by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      Sweet, I posted this in a previous thread

      Timely case mod and sharp looking too!

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
  5. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by n0dalus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You wouldn't do it right? Because you know you'd be out $1000.

    No, I wouldn't do it because I'd have a bunch of pseudo-scientists clambering over me for my delicious bounty.

  6. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, nobody's doing it because it's stupid.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  7. snicker... by ankarbass · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's already been done. So if you are the "brilliant scientist" with evidence, just give the the amazing randi" a call and you can be a "brilliant scientist" with a million dollars.

    --
    Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    1. Re:snicker... by stilz2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the list of things that qualify as paranormal, ones of them is: "...Pyramid Power. Reflexology. Acupuncture". How is acupuncture paranormal and/or why does it needs to be proven? I was under the impression that it's been considered a valid medical practice already.

    2. Re:snicker... by dookiesan · · Score: 1
      Ok, this is an honest question. I turned off the lights and lay down in bed one night, and I heard a rustle in my blinds right above my head. I bolted out of bed and turned on my light and saw that one of the blinds had bent outward as in this picture



      http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=10/30222404245.jpg& s=x11



      Does anyone know what would cause this? There are two bends at 90 degrees and the paint was even scraped a little near the bend. I honestly can't figure it out and was hoping a skeptical mind might have an idea. I know the picture is blurry, but I took ten of the f-ing pictures and this was the best I could do givin the lighting conditions.

      Thanks.

    3. Re:snicker... by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1

      Have you cats?

    4. Re:snicker... by rar · · Score: 1

      From the site's FAQ:

      The following things are paranormal by definition:
      [...] Violations of Newton's Laws of Motion [...]


      Eh?... If this is the case, then even I belive in the paranormal... Looks like Einstein has some cash to withdraw here.
      How do they look on discoveries of exotic particles? Seems like there might be some easy money here afterall...

    5. Re:snicker... by dookiesan · · Score: 1

      Yes one cat, but I don't think my cat could have done this. I'd have trouble making those bends with my own bare hands. I thought maybe stress due to heat or something could have caused it to spontaneously bend out of shape, but even that seems pretty unlikely.

  8. The rest room by b_sirrobin · · Score: 5, Funny

    At my office, some mysterious creature keeps "watering" the floor of the men's restroom. Does that count?

    1. Re:The rest room by otherniceman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if you are a Ghost, Zombie, 1st Line tech support or other form of living dead.

    2. Re:The rest room by mikael · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad? Somebody keeps drinking the water out of the mug on my desk, even when the cleaner was on holiday and the door was locked. And a web-cam set to record any motion didn't detect anyone or anything!

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:The rest room by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahaha! I wish I had mod points. Dunno why but that really tickled me. A mate of mine likes to mark his territory in mens room in a similar fashion.

    4. Re:The rest room by arose · · Score: 1

      What if he is an angel, vamipra, 2nd Line tech support or other mythical creature that people claim to know, but will never lead you to?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:The rest room by Jjeff1 · · Score: 1

      It's NOT funny. The same thing happens in my office. The person doing it is the head of IT. Since apparently you can't fire people for pissing all over the floor, they've put up signs that read "please keep restroom clean".

      Yea, that should solve it. Cause most people wouldn't realize until they saw that sign that it was wrong to pee on the floor.

  9. They shouldn't put up just money. by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    They shouldn't put up just money. With the rising inflation in the US, $1000 dollars may be the equivalent of toilet paper by tomorrow, and less valuable than that a week later.

    If they are truly sure, then they should put their genitals on the line. Indeed, such a skeptic could offer to cut off his own penis if he is proven wrong. Even better, he'd have to eat it. Just to be kind, he could be allowed to smear some relish on it first.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:They shouldn't put up just money. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      If they are truly sure, then they should put their genitals on the line.

      You've misunderstood the point.

      Randi isn't putting up the money because he's so sure none of these things exists. He's putting it up because he's so sure that those who claim to have special powers or insight are never able or willing to back it up. You may be surprised that most of those who are the fiercest skeptics are the same ones who most want the claims to be real.

      I think the amount is well over one million dollars at the Randi foundation right now. All someone has to do is just . . . do what they say they can. No smoke or mirrors. Controlled scientific tests where you prove you can do what you say to the rest of the world and never deal with being called a fake again. Not bad, huh? Oh - and get rich in the process.

      And what do the "skeptics" get out of it? Fuck, a million bucks to find and document the proof of some paranormal ability... how amazing would that be? Do you seriously think Randi would be all bummed if someone took him up on his offer and passed with flying colors? Hell no. I gaurantee that would be the best day of his entire life - and it would change the world.

    2. Re:They shouldn't put up just money. by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 1

      Haha. I wouldn't be surprised it someone actually cut their balls off, remembering a story from a while ago.

      On the news here in the UK a while back, a guy told his mates that if Wales beat England in the a rugby match (for the first time in 12 years), he would cut off his own testicles..... And so he did. Pick your news source and read it yourself.

    3. Re:They shouldn't put up just money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that inflation for the last 20 years has been and remains historically low, don't you?

      http://www.gpec.org/InfoCenter/Topics/Economy/USIn flation.html

      Never let facts get in the way of your beliefs.

    4. Re:They shouldn't put up just money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe your post isn't at +5 insightful.

  10. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

    Erm, isn't the point of calling ghosts and the like supernatural specifically because they don't comform to the laws of nature (And as such, any science based around it).

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  11. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by Koil · · Score: 1

    I guess it would depend on your definiton of the fact that Ghosts exists...I don't think that they've been scientifically proven to exist, as well I am pretty sure more than a grand has gone into trying to do so. ...a haunted stapler ....a copier possessed by the devil himself .....thats just business as usual around here, pal.

  12. Ghosts ? Oh yeah. I have seen lots of them by calvin1981 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here at MIT, we regularly see ghostly figures walking around in distress at 4 in the morning. We call them grad students.

    1. Re:Ghosts ? Oh yeah. I have seen lots of them by antdude · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The only ghosts I see at office is Norton Ghost. Oh, you mean a different Ghost. Nevermind. [grin]

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  13. I see dead people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having worked for many years in London, I have been in more than one haunted office. The most recent was an international bank that built their plush new London offices over what turned out to be an important Roman site (discovered when they dug to create the foundations). Lots of strange things happened in the basement server rooms, ops reporting that they had seen figures even though they were there alone during the night, peoples voices and such like.

    1. Re:I see dead people by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I invite you to post logged-in again, explain something more and give a link to some photos. With anything supernatural appearing repeatedly in the same spot and timeframe, you have not forgotten to make some photos, do you?

    2. Re:I see dead people by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know this is a bit OT but one of my co-workers has a coffee cup with the slogan "I see dumb people". I have never had any problem believing that one.

    3. Re:I see dead people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice story there man..

      I honestly enjoy stories like this... Not because I want to / don't want to believe, but because everybody enjoys a bit of a fantacy world of make belief... And this sort of thing really does make life that much more interesting, to know that we as individuals know nothing and only "see" what our senses allow us to perceive..

    4. Re:I see dead people by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "I know this is a bit OT but one of my co-workers has a coffee cup with the slogan "I see dumb people". I have never had any problem believing that one."

      May be OT, but perfectly applicable to any thread about ghosts, unicorns, and other works of fiction.

  14. I don't know about haunted ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but it is filled with dispirited souls

  15. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $1000 is a pittance compared to the fame you'll achieve for even being connected to scientific proof of ghosts. Obviously people would put up $1000, and for more, if only to make much more money off the book deal and talk show appearances. I'm just James Randi would be honestly happy for the JREF to part with their million to be a part of something so momentous and significant to our understanding of the world.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  16. Let's see... by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
    Is your office haunted?

    Hmmm..... zombies... sinister whispers... The Boss That Wouldn't Die...

    Seems there's a chance...

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  17. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by Will_Malverson · · Score: 1

    Here's a better idea: If you can repeatably show "evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power or event", James Randi will pay you one... MILLION dollars.

    If you're willing to put a time limit on it, I will gladly enter into a $1000 wager with you on whether or not ghosts or other similar phenomena will be proven to be real in that time frame.

  18. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. I don't need to put up a measly thousand when James Randi's foundation has already put up a million dollars for scientific proof of the supernatural. No one to date has claimed the prize. Not even in the 41 years that it has existed.

  19. Re:There are no ghosts by Koil · · Score: 1

    Now thats absolute crap...I know several people who aren't religious but still believe that there is residual energy left from a person. Whether you want to call that energy a persons soul is another matter entirely, but a blanket statement like that leaves no wonder that you post AC.

  20. is OSS haunted? by cryptoz · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, my installation of OOo is just fine, but all you MS lovers out there using Office XP - you better watch out. It's been statistically proven that BSODs occur at a higher frequency on Halloween...

  21. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by raoul666 · · Score: 1

    Tell you what: I'll bet you $1000 you can't scientifically prove they exist within, say, a year.

    --
    When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
  22. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Why not drop the time frame and spend the money, since no one, even with an infinite amount of time and resources can prove something that doesn't exist. It would be worth restricting 'super natural' or people will start pointing to any unsolved scientific fact , like the two slit experiment, as being 'super natural'.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  23. Re:There are no pink unicorns by ankarbass · · Score: 2, Informative

    I also know several people who are not religious and they believe in Santa Claus. Of course, all of them are under six years of age, so we might want to forgive their irrational ignorance this one time.

    --
    Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
  24. Office Halloween pranks gone wrong. by CyricZ · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This doesn't have much to do with the truly paranormal, but it does have to do with office Halloween tricks that go severely wrong.

    At a firm I once worked at we had a jokestress named Maria. She was pretty good natured, and every Halloween she's pull some sort of a prank. Usually they were quite benign, such as a plastic skull in the coffee container, or some such.

    However, one Halloween she decided to go a bit further than usual. She thought it would be entertaining to dress the photocopier up as a Hawaiian skeleton (I'm not sure why). So she bought much white paper, and some flower necklaces, and stuff like that. She dressed the photocopier up, and some people were amused by it.

    Just before lunch a slight problem arose. Some of the flowers had gotten sucked into the machine through the paper intake. Apparently some of the flowers jammed something inside, and things started t really go wrong.

    Jim, who was one of the systems administrators able to fix copier problems, thought he could get it unjammed. So he opened the side panel of the machine to work on it, but apparently forgot to turn the power off. The paper feed mechanism somehow caught onto his tie, and started pulling him in.

    Luckily somebody was around kick out the power cord, but not after the machine was even more broken, and the toner tank ruptured. Jim was covered in that awful powder, and he ended up tracking it all over the office on his way out. Maria was swiftly dismissed.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Office Halloween pranks gone wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your story is sad and depressing Mr. Z... the one person in your office who tried to lighten everybody's day gets fired because of random bad luck... three cheers for corporate america!

    2. Re:Office Halloween pranks gone wrong. by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      At a past job one of the engineers pulled a number of pranks on the other unsuspecting victims. In on persons cube he taped an outline as if a dead body had been laying in the cube. The next day the victim laughed and pulled the tape up. The next day the outline was back. But this time the prankster took a razor blade and cut the tape in 1/8 inch segments along the entire outline of the dead body. It took better than a week for the victim to pull up the tape from the outline. But then the spooky thing happened. A couple of weeks later the outline reappeared. This time it was not made of tape but dirt that collected on the gummy residue that was left on the carpet since it took so long to remove it.

      This same prankster also rigged a container of muster seeds behind a grate in the ceiling over one of the managers cubes. The container was tipped over at the appropriate time scattering seeds all over the place. The fun part was again a few weeks later when the stray musterd seeds started sprouting in the carpet.

      And of course the big prank one year was when he removed the tires from one of his coworkers truck. Managed to pull two of the tires and rolled them through the office to find a hiding place. He then passed out the lug nuts to various people in the office with instructions to give them back through the day.

    3. Re:Office Halloween pranks gone wrong. by winwar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Jim, who was one of the systems administrators able to fix copier problems, thought he could get it unjammed. So he opened the side panel of the machine to work on it, but apparently forgot to turn the power off. The paper feed mechanism somehow caught onto his tie, and started pulling him in."

      Of course I'm wondering why Maria was the only one dismissed....

    4. Re:Office Halloween pranks gone wrong. by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "
      At a firm I once worked at we had a jokestress named Maria."

      Let me guess, it was hard getting the toner out of your hair?

      -/kidding

      But that's sad that she was fired over a malfunctioning decoration in an attempt to boost morale. Hopefully there was a better reason than that for her dismissal.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    5. Re:Office Halloween pranks gone wrong. by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a really wonderful guy to work with.

  25. My office? What about my house? by russiste · · Score: 4, Informative

    Shameless plug... if you're under the impression that your neighborhood is weird or that your house creaks only on satanic holidays, check out this map of haunted places to double-check that you've chosen the right place to live.

    Happy halloween...

    Greg

    --
    Loopsh of fury.
    1. Re:My office? What about my house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My old house was haunted. I never really believed before really strange stuff started happening. The creaky floor boards, television changing channels, lights turning off when you enter a room is nothing until you walk into the bathroom in the middle of the night and see the toilet paper roll spinning all on its own, spewing out paper all over the place until the roll was empty...

      It made me a believer - I moved the next month.

    2. Re:My office? What about my house? by gijoel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I noticed that America was the only country in the world that had ghosts. No wonder your country is so scary!!

    3. Re:My office? What about my house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This holiday is not Satanic. It's current form is actually Christian. It's previous form, Samhain, is what Christian's would call "pagan". It is an ancient Celtic holiday.

  26. My Office Isn't But, I think My Anus Is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several times a day my anus makes a scary sound and an ill wind bursts forth and emanates a foul odor. It's got to be evil spirits!

    Strangely, consuming good spirits, like Jack Daniels, makes it even worse!

  27. Haunted with Zombies by Jeng · · Score: 1

    Filled to the brim with zombies I say! Zombies at the desks! Zombies on the desks! And no brains to be found! Thats why I work in the warehouse.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  28. I also know halloween is around the corner... by Wisgary · · Score: 0

    when I hear 90% of radio ads saying stuff like "COME NOW FOR PHANTASMAGORIC SAVINGS!!!" or "GET YOUR CAR NOW WITH A GHOSTLY LOW PRICE" and other idiotic uses of "scary" words.

  29. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by G · · Score: 1

    That would be the case, yes. But it's actually defined by the current body of scientific knowledge. Fire was magic at one point ; )

  30. Amazon.com by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a little bit surprised that no one has mentioned Amazon.com yet -- but my understanding is that their headquarters is haunted by a number of spectres. For those who are unfamiliar with the building it's a remodeled hospital that was built back in the '30s. The most common 'sighting' sounds a lot like a "who farted" kind of joke. One of the elevators, apparently, will fill with an unbearable stench -- some riders have been known to nearly vomit when they smell it -- while others are unable to smell it at all. Before amazon moved in the building's owners had recieved so many complaints about the smell in this elevator that they hired teams of investigators to find the source of the contamination, tracing back the ventilation shafts, and so on.... No cause has been found and the reports continue.

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    1. Re:Amazon.com by Koil · · Score: 1

      Sounds like that elevator is just haunted by Bob from accounting after having had the #4 at Rancho Burrito

    2. Re:Amazon.com by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Are there any tours available through their HQ? I mean, a repeatable supernatural phenomenon will draw in thousands of visitors, let alone bring you Randi's million bucks. So where's a link and a photo? :)

    3. Re:Amazon.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So where's a link and a photo? :)

      How do you photograph flatulence?

    4. Re:Amazon.com by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Flatulence is a mix of gases.

      Straight from Wikipedia: The primary constituents ... are ... nitrogen, oxygen, methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen. ...

      Gas released mostly has a foul odor which mainly results from low molecular weight fatty acids such as butyric acid (rancid butter smell) and reduced sulfur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg smell) and carbonyl sulfide that are the result of protein breakdown.

      Methane is the main component of regular natural gas. That's why there are hundreds of meters and gauges on the market to detect even minute amounts of methane. Every gas installation company probably has some of them in use every day. Rent one, set it up to record one datapoint every ten seconds, scan or photograph the printout. Then prove there's no other source of natural gas in the house, collect the million dollar bounty and post photos everywhere to annoy scientists.

    5. Re:Amazon.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That stench is just the patent lawyers, thet're full of it alright.

    6. Re:Amazon.com by rco3 · · Score: 1

      I was gonna suggest that. I *KNOW* that my office has been haunted by a few brown ghosts over the last few years. Sure, it's not exactly "paranormal"... but it's still pretty scary.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    7. Re:Amazon.com by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "One of the elevators, apparently, will fill with an unbearable stench -- some riders have been known to nearly vomit when they smell it -- while others are unable to smell it at all."

      Last week I took my girlfriend down to the Queen Mary docked in Long Beach, California. This ship is supposed to be haunted, but nobody can really tell these days since it's full of tourists all the time now. We both had an experience fairly similar to the one you described. When I boarded the ship, I detected a strong odor near one of the exhibits. I asked my gf if she could smell it. She said no and suddenly, and I do mean suddenly, it was gone. What's weird about it is that I don't have much of a sense of smell. I rarely detect anything unless I'm seriously looking for it. The fact that I smelled anything at all was alarming, hehe. Anyway, later on the ship my girlfriend thought she noticed something. Same story. She detected it for a moment but instantly it was gone. She was rather puzzled by it. After she had smelled it, she noticed a plaque in the room that claimed there were ghost sightings in that particular room. (just aft of the bridge on the starboard side if anybody's curious. Opposite of the navigator's quarters.)

      Honestly, it very easily could have been just a random smell on the ship. But it did make for an interesting discussion on the way home. Hehe.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Amazon.com by GooseKirk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I took my girlfriend to the Queen Mary a few years ago - and man, I don't understand why it's not more popular. We had a fantastic time, and the ship is amazing. I think I paid something like $70/night. I can't recommend it enough.

      We spent some time at night wandering around the ship, looking for unlocked doors and just trying to explore as much as possible. Pretty cool girlfriend, I have to say. The big ballrooms are kind of spooky at night. Somewhere deep in the ship, I passed by what looked like some kind of utility door and tried the knob. Locked. But as soon as I stepped away from the door, I heard it buzz, like an electronic lock being opened. I stopped and looked around. We were totally alone. I stepped back towards the door and the buzzing stopped. Locked. Pulled my hand away, and it buzzed again. Then I saw the security camera up in the corner. I thought that was pretty cool... instead of security coming to hassle us for trying to infiltrate the ship, they had some fun with us instead. Gotta respect that.

      We did eventually find a way to get into the closed pool area at night. That's supposed to be haunted, but it's now a tourist attraction during the day. It took some work to get to it, but it was very cool... very dark and creepy. Unfortunately, my girlfriend freaked out and wanted to leave right away, saying she felt really cold... the best part was, though, that getting into the pool area was a one-way trip. The doors locked behind us. We had to figure another way out, and it wasn't easy.

      Anyway, if you're in Los Angeles, go stay on the ship. The museums are good, the food is good, and the atmosphere can't be beat.

    9. Re:Amazon.com by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Oh.. ouch, wish I had talked to you before. The pool and the engine room was where we wanted to visit, but now they've got some dumb ass 'ghost experience' attraction there. Was that there when you visited? Just curious if they're permenantly blocked off.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:Amazon.com by GooseKirk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, the ghost attraction thing was there. We didn't do that, but the process of getting to the pool area took us through a bunch of hallways that are part of the ghost attraction. Lots of "spooky" fake cobwebs and such. I dunno, I heard it's actually kinda fun, but we didn't feel like going. Well, officially, anyway. From what I could see in the dark, the pool area doesn't look like it's been significantly messed up. I think they discreetly installed eerie lighting and so on, but it's not like they just ripped out the pool and replaced it with something cheesy.

      I believe the engine room is pretty thoroughly closed off. We went everywhere we possibly could in the ship, and didn't manage to get anywhere near the engine room. I know, I wanted to get there, too. Who knows, maybe someone will find the right unlocked door sometime... keep trying!

      Anyway, if you ever go back... getting to the pool at night is tricky, like I said. And getting out is even trickier. Just remember the doors are one-way. There's barely any lighting in the pool room at night, so a flashlight would be a good idea. I recommend spending some time just hanging out chatting with the night clerks there... if you seem like a decent sort, who knows, they might give you a bit of a clue about how to do it. Otherwise, just start walking around looking for open doors...

    11. Re:Amazon.com by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Welp, im outta questions and interesting things to say. Just wanted to thank ya for the info. :)

      G'nite!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:Amazon.com by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "I believe the engine room is pretty thoroughly closed off. We went everywhere we possibly could in the ship, and didn't manage to get anywhere near the engine room. I know, I wanted to get there, too. Who knows, maybe someone will find the right unlocked door sometime... keep trying!"

      I had a strange engine room experience once, although not exactly paranormal.

      I was travelling to Rotterdam from England on a ship with a band I was in at the time. About halfway across me and the drummer decided to go exploring, so off we went with bottles of beer in hand and several more in a bag (we'd been drinking most of the morning on our way to the ferry terminal so were quite plastered to begin with).

      After a while we found ourselves down in the engine room, next to the actual engines, and spent a while looking around at all the machinery. We got lost and finally found a stairwell and started going up.

      A couple of gantries and tight stairwells later we realized we were totally lost and couldn't go very far horizontally, so kept going up.

      We finally came to a metal door set into the ceiling at the top of a flight of stairs, opened it and suddenly clouds of thick black smoke started filling the space we were in, but we could see daylight and decided to hussle up the stairs and through the door because the smoke was very acrid and, quite frankly, we panicked.

      After a few moments coughing and wiping our teary eyes we realized we were standing right next to an array of squat chimneys surrounded by a shoulder high metal wall. We were at the very top of the ship. And upon looking over the wall we noticed the ship had just docked.

      That was quite a shock.

      We finally made it all the way back to where our tour bus was still parked, because luckily they hadn't started offloading the vehicles, and clambered in as if nothing had happened. We were greeted with much laughter and a mirror so we could see our pitch black and grimy faces staring back.

      Rock And Roll!!!

    13. Re:Amazon.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was travelling to Rotterdam from England on a ship with a band I was in at the time. About halfway across me and the drummer decided to go exploring, so off we went with bottles of beer in hand and several more in a bag

      Something tells me that it wasn't just beer in the bag.

    14. Re:Amazon.com by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "Then prove there's no other source of natural gas in the house, collect the million dollar bounty and post photos everywhere to annoy scientists."

      You're expecting the obligatory "I don't need a million dollars, my 'proof' of the supernatural provides enough personal satisfaction" response to Randi's challenge, I assume :)

    15. Re:Amazon.com by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Not really. Winning one million dollars AND the right to stick it to critics is the point here :) - I'm as much a materialist as the next poster here, but yes, even without money, a scientific proof would be an enormous breakthrough.

      There are far too many accounts from eyewitnesses, including some from experienced officers and university professors to dismiss the entire thing. These stories are as old as mankind itself, probably the oldest meme of all. It wouldn't be good science if we just ignored them. I guess that's the reason behind the Randi Challenge, as it would be foolish to pursue all account from a scientific side. Let the mediums come out by themselves, if they dare.

    16. Re:Amazon.com by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "There are far too many accounts from eyewitnesses, including some from experienced officers and university professors to dismiss the entire thing."

      Intelligent people believe stupid and outlandish things on a regular basis. A degree or military position is no absolute defense against irrational thought. I'd suggest checking out Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (written in the 1800s) and the excellent Why People Believe Weird Things for more reasons why apophenia gets the best of us :)

  31. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    James Randi has offered one million dollars to anyone who can prove the existence of anything supernatural or paranormal. No one has claimed the prize, and I say no one will. There may be things we don't understand the nature of yet, but there is no such thing as supernatural or paranormal.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  32. Hrm, something smells fishy about the Randi foundation... from the linked site:

    No one has ever taken the formal test, as one must first pass the preliminary test.

    Apparently they can arbitrarily set rules and conditions for the preliminary test which most people refuse for some reason. Also, it is worth noting that should the Randi foundation ever actually have to pay the million, they would cease to exist. Just a couple of points to consider...

    1. Re:Fishy by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apparently they can arbitrarily set rules and conditions for the preliminary test which most people refuse for some reason.

      Yes. And that reason is that they know they'll be proven to be a fraud. Those paranormal dorks only want to perform on their own terms under their own controlled conditions. Never anything scientific. Hey, if you can levitate, do it. Show the world. Show Randi and get rich.

      But nah, the Silvia Brown's and Uri Gellars of the world would much rather indulge in fame and fortune on such enlightened outlets such as the Art Bell show and Montel Williams.

      If someone could prove to me under controlled scientific conditions that any of these paranormal claims (ghosts, aliens, levitation, ESP, etc) are absolutely real, I'd cut off my left nut and donate 50% of my salary to charity for the rest of my entire life.

      But the fact is, nobody ever wants controlled expiriments, because they can't cheat. I mean . . . DUH. And what's hilarious is the same people who are rational enough to call out creationists and other nuts have no problem indulging in little green men, caspers and David Blaine.

    2. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, don't get me wrong, I agree with you, I'm just saying that the Randi foundation cannot be held as an unbiased group by any stretch of the imagination. In fact they have a powerful vested interest in never handing out their million. Mind you, some of the applicants do provide a good deal of comic relief... heres one beauty from the site, he was also talking about "lightning a tree".

      You owe me a million dollars: 2 million.
      1: for the itching you got when I first demonstrated possessors exits.
      2: for the demonstration with two independent witnesses who verifyed it, and hopefully will work with your demonstration checker.

      Calling the police and reporting you for fraud is a step I could take. The contract I signed did not have three wittnesses, so you dont believe I signed it, so it is invalid.

      John N. Maguire III and the gosts
      send for our free religion

    3. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 4, Informative

      Christ, at least be honest. The test protocol is agreed to by BOTH the participant and the James Randi Foundation. What this says is that applicants won't agree to a proper test protocol. If you say that ghosts exist why wouldn't you agree to ruling out EVERY possible alternative explanation. The rules aren't "arbitrary", they are designed to eliminate any chance that the "paranormal" is misrepresenting his claims and are agreed to by the paranormal. A true paranormal would welcome the strictest of tests because it would prove beyond doubt that, at the very least, his skills are genuine. If you could prove that you could talk to the dead you would be rich beyond your dreams as you would have the entire world as your client.

      The fact that nobody has ever been tested is testament to the fact that "Paranormals" are a bunch of frauds. At best they're entertaining, at worst they're criminals.

      As this excerpt from the FAQ points out. Finger pointing is pointless. Either you have the skill or you don't and since you have to agree to the test protocol you can't claim that it was some set of "arbitrary" rules.

      Since 1964 parnormals have had the opportunity to put up or shut up, yet in over fourty years, none have.

      Taken from http://www.randi.org/

      1.1. What's the history of the Challenge?

      The Challenge started in 1964 when James Randi put up $1,000 of his own money to the first person who could provide objective proof of the paranormal [1]. Since then, the prize money has grown to the current $1,000,000, and the rules regarding the Challenge have gotten more and more official and legal. It is vital that you understand this fact before you apply. The contract signifies your willingness to adhere to the Challenge rules. If you do not feel that you can abide by the rules, you should not apply, because NO rules will be circumvented on your behalf. So don't even ask.

      1.2. Why is there a Challenge in the first place?

      During a live radio panel discussion, James Randi was challenged by a parapsychologist to "put [his] money where [his] mouth is", and Randi responded by offering to pay $1,000 to anyone who demonstrated a paranormal power under satisfactory observational conditions. [2]

      1.3. How many applicants have there been for the Challenge?

      Between 1964 and 1982, Randi declared that over 650 people had applied [3]. Between 1997 and February 15, 2005, there had been a total of 360 official, notarized applications.

      1.4. How many people have passed the preliminary test?

      None. Most applicants never agree to a proper test protocol, so most are never tested.

      1.5. How many people have passed the formal test?
      No one has ever taken the formal test, as one must first pass the preliminary test.

      2.1. What do you mean by "mutually agreed upon"?

      "Mutually agreed upon" means that neither side can force the other side into doing or saying something that they don't want to, and that if no agreement can be reached, the application process is terminated, with no blame or fault attributed to either side.
      It's easy to point fingers after a Challenge claim comes to an impasse and say that the other side was being unreasonable. This phrase is used to insure that finger-pointing has no merit.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    4. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JREF has a forum with challenge application emails submitted back and forth between whoever wants the $1mil and JREF. You can see that the preliminary test is created under conditions that *both* parties have agreed to:

      http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=43

    5. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, thats the part I was looking for...

      "Mutually agreed upon" means that neither side can force the other side into doing or saying something that they don't want to, and that if no agreement can be reached, the application process is terminated, with no blame or fault attributed to either side.

      So essentially what they are saying is that if the applicants can't agree to their conditions, no test will proceed. Which is what I was saying they were saying. Besides you didn't respond to my second point which was that the Randi foundation has a great deal of motivation to never hand over the loot. Don't think I'm in favour of the looney tunes, I'm not, I just can't accept the foundation as being the definitive last word in fair and unbiased testing of the paranormal.

    6. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      It says right in the FAQ that it's an adversarial process. That is, they don't believe you to begin with and it's up to you to prove it. However, I don't think they care as much as you think about the one million dollars in the same way that you or I would. It does not belong to "james randi", it belongs to the organization which is a non-profit.

      That is, there is no basis for your implication that being out a cool million is reason for JREF to be fraudulent or to design tests that are not passable by a legitimate paranormal. It probably only seems that way because there isn't any such thing as a legitimate paranormal.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    7. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      I responded to your other point in another post.

      What they are saying is, that you have to prove beyond doubt that what you claim is true, is in fact true. The reason paranormals don't agree to the rules is because they are a bunch of frauds.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    8. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      It does not belong to "james randi", it belongs to the organization which is a non-profit.

      Yes, and I might be mistaken, but the sole and whole purpose of this organisation, from the site at least, is to hand a million dollars to the person that can demonstrate paranormal powers. The foundation employs at least one person, probably quite a few, all of whom would be out of a job if the tests are ever passed, and the foundation as a whole would cease to exist, probably. Also being a non profit, it can receive tax deductable donations. None of which makes me any more confident in them have a real interest in ever proving that someone has paranormal powers.

      It probably only seems that way because there isn't any such thing as a legitimate paranormal.

      Well, I'm not qualified to comment on this myself, and I'm not sure you are either. As someone who largely adheres to science and the scientific method, I prefer only to make definitive statements about things I am relatively certain of.

    9. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      No, the purpose of the organization is to debunk pseudoscience. If you claim something is true, prove it, else, don't "make definitive statements about things" you are not "relatively certain of". I'm relatively certain btw, that there isn't any such thing as a legitmate paranormal.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    10. Re:Fishy by Ponzicar · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? There's a hell of a lot more money in a TRUE paranormal ability than there is in exposing the false ones (after all, nobody likes the party pooper). Besides, even if one paranormal thing gets proven true, that by no means makes everything else paranormal true as well.

    11. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the purpose of the organization is to debunk pseudoscience.

      So the whole million dollars thing is just a side show... I see...

      If you claim something is true, prove it

      Eh I'm not claiming anything is true, or untrue either. In fact I don't really care if there are paranormal powers in the world, I have neither the time nor the patience to deal with that question. All I'm saying is the Randi foundation cannot be pointed to as solid evidence that such powers and-or abilities don't exist, since discovery of such powers and abilities would cost them a cool million. The first time.

      I'm relatively certain btw, that there isn't any such thing as a legitmate paranormal.

      Based on what criteria? What scientific evidence? Absence of proof is not proof of absence. Two centuries ago, would you have been relatively certain that radio waves didn't exist?

      I dunno, I seem to have hit a nerve here, I won't repeat myself any further. I have yet to hear any transcripts from within the foundation to support or deny my hypothesis, but until I do, I still maintain that they have a strong incentive never to pay, and this remains an important factor to consider.

    12. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Two centuries ago, would you have been relatively certain that radio waves didn't exist?"

      That's a naive analogy. Radio waves do exist, and they existed then. If you posessed a transmitter and receiver you could demonstrate that fact. The lack of understanding has NOTHING to do with the cause and effect. Paranormals make claims that they can affect the physical world with their powers. If for example ESP existed, then it would be demonstrable regardless of our understanding of it. We would not have to wait 200 years to discover the mechanism just to see that it exists.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    13. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Radio waves do exist, and they existed then.

      Indeed they did. So did quantum mechanics and x-rays. But no one had a clue that they existed.

      The lack of understanding has NOTHING to do with the cause and effect.

      And the lack of observable (at the time) effect, for example with x-rays, has nothing to do with the fact that they still existed, whether we knew about them or not. Similar to paranormal events. To think that we have anything more than the feeblest of grasps on the nature of reality at this time is the height of arrogance. We didn't know much back then, and we sure don't know much now. You are simply making my argument stronger.

      If for example ESP existed, then it would be demonstrable regardless of our understanding of it.

      Sigh. Could a person 200 years ago, given the knowledge and skills they had at the time, have demonstrated quantum theory? No. Can we demonstrate esp powers with what we have now? No. Might we in future? Maybe. Getting it?

      You know, the most interesting thing to come out of this discussion for me at least, has been the amount of responses and modding and the type of modding. This tells me that the slashdot crowd is TERRIFIED of this topic, for reasons I have yet to fathom. As for you, you are producing circular arguments that have no bearing on what I say, and I see no likelihood that your mind will ever be changed, which tells me a good deal about you, also. Still, you did hook a good deal of karma out of it, although I think the well has run dry, but you'll be up to a base 2 in no time. :p

    14. Re:Fishy by Da3vid · · Score: 1

      But isn't it partly the point that people claim to have powers that they can use, but they can never show anyone. I won't deny that the possibility of the power may exist, but what of all these people claiming to have these powers? If people claim they can levitate, why don't they do it under controlled conditions? If people can read minds, why don't they do it under controlled conditions? Et cetera. I think the point of the above about radio waves (although not well executed) has merit. We had no conception of radio waves 200 years ago. Once we did, we were able to find them and show them. The point is that people have claimed to have found paranormal powers. Now, we want to see them.

    15. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It means you're an idiot who still can't see that intangible unverifiable invisible psychic powers that are indestinguishable from a figment of the human imagination are a waste of time to talk about.

      You know what. Psi powers would be super cool.
      We'd all love to have 'em.
      We're not terrified of 'em.
      That they might show up at some future date has nothing to do with the fact that EVERY SINGLE EXAMPLE OF IT TO DATE HAS BEEN FRAUDULENT.

      Get it yet?
      No?
      Moron.

    16. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Sigh. Could a person 200 years ago, given the knowledge and skills they had at the time, have demonstrated quantum theory? No. Can we demonstrate esp powers with what we have now? No. Might we in future? Maybe. Getting it? "

      Sigh yourself. You seem to think you're making some deep points. But you fail to see the simplest of points. No knowledge or skill is necessary to demonstrate something that one claims has obvious effect.

      People CLAIM they have a power, for example, that ridiculous women that talks to animals that she demonstrates daily on TV to millions, if not billions, of idiots around the world. This woman implicitly claims that animals have human like thoughts, are aware of familial relationships, perhaps even the basics of math, science, etc, and are able to share this with humans who have her "power". This claim is not outside the limitation of science to test. This is not a limitation of our ability to measure. This woman claims that she talks to animals and that they talk back and despite the fact that you can't hear them, she can.

      Now, let's suppose she's telling the truth and the communication happens via some mechanism that we don't yet understand and won't for thousands of years.

      You CAN say that science can say nothing about that mechanism today. You cannot test that mechanism without some understanding of what it is.

      BUT, and it's a BIG DAMN BUT, you can test her ability. Tell five cats that they have a new name. Tell each cat in isolation that his name is X. Make sure that the cat hears the name X many many times, say five thousand times or more. X must be different from the cats name given by the owners.

      Now, we send the cats, one at a time, into a room with her. However, no cat owners can be present. Can she successfully tell us what the original name of the cat is, and what each cat was told its new name is?

      I've seen the show, in between fits of laughter I caught enough of her responses to suggest to me that she believes she could do such a thing.

      But, let's say she doesn't like that PROTOCOL. She is free to design one of her own so long as it fully demonstrates that her power is indeed talking to animals and NOT reading clues from her customers.

      No science equipment is needed to test such a "power". People claim today that they have such powers and that they affect the world with their powers. That ability can be tested without understanding any mechanism that may or may not exist.

      Just as if you had a radio 5000 yeas ago, you could test the existence of a magical medium that allowed you to talk over great distances.

      Perhaps you should consider the moderation to mean somthing different than you seem to think. You seem to think that you are offering some kind of insight into the matter yet others disagree. It is possible, that the reason isn't because others don't get it, but rather because you don't.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    17. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      I concur. My whole point was not to argue that paranormal powers exist, however, but that the Randi foundation cannot be held up as proof that paranormal powers do not exist, which many in this thread have been attempting to do. Nothing more and nothing less.

    18. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      And the ad hominems fly thick and fast. Nothing like a good serving of those to add weight to an argument. I'll make this clear to you again. I don't care whether or not these powers exist. Which makes you the proud owner of a lot of strawmen, rapidly advancing into troll territory. Ah forget it, if I need to repeat myself yet again there really is no point. You are so fixated on defeating paranormal beliefs that you are missing the point that I don't have any. Sigh.

    19. Re:Fishy by DoninIN · · Score: 1

      Empirically demonstrated, proven by to skeptics "paranormal" abilities of any sort would be millions, if not billions, and god forbid these "ablities" the Randi people would be in at the sub-basement level of the investment opportunity of a lifetime. That alone would make the financial considerations nuetral. Furthermore if any single one of these soothsayers or or people who claim various paranomral abilities could truthfully demonstrate something that could be replicated in a double blind trial they'd be beating down doors to have it proven to the skeptical world. I understand there's money to be made in fleecing the stupid and foolish, but just stop to ponder how much money a relaible phsycic could make from the insurance companies, for example, or how much money there would be in actually being able to talk to the dead. Find me someone who can actually find water, oil or lost items via dowsing and if we can talk them into giving us .5% each we can all retire comfortably.

    20. Re:Fishy by GooseKirk · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, no one ever proved that Daniel Dunglas Home was a fraud. Not saying I believe he was the real deal, I'm just saying that perhaps claiming that "EVERY SINGLE EXAMPLE OF IT TO DATE HAS BEEN [proven] FRAUDULENT" may not be accurate. And to call someone a moron when you probably have never even heard of this guy doesn't exactly demonstrate your superior knowledge and intellect on the topic.

    21. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      Nobody is missing your point. You are saying we should question the motives of the Randi Foundation as they are fiscally motivated. We get it.

      You have failed to make your point. You have no evidence about their motivations. You only have your own speculation based on projecting your ideals onto his organization. What's left is the equivalent of you trying to prove that santa claus might exist and lives at the center of the earth instead of the north pole yet we can't disprove this yet because his powers allow him to shrink to the size of a proton while he's there and we can't measure him with our current equipment.

      There are an infinite possiblity of things that science MAY find. But it's NOT science to speculate about what they might be. The randi foundation is about debunking pseudoscience, which paranormal activity is. The day it becomes science, the randi foundation won't have anything to do with it anymore...getting it?

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    22. Re:Fishy by photon317 · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Jesus just shut the fuck up and admit you're wrong.

      There's a dude out there who will sign a contract and give anyone on the planet $1 million in hard cash if they only demonstrate anything paranormal in a truly correct scientific way. Nobody, not one single person among the innumerable charlatans on this planet, has stepped forward and made a decent effort to obtain the prize. That speaks volumes. Sometimes, abscence of proof really is proof of abscence. At the very least, it is proof that even if there are "paranormal" effects out there that nobody understands, none of the current crop of practicioners are anything but frauds.

      I can't believe I'm even having this conversation on this site. Where did rationality go?

      --
      11*43+456^2
    23. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      We get it.

      I love it, we. So you speak for all now? I must have missed the election.

      You have failed to make your point.

      Only to you. In fact I think the point I'm making isn't the point that you want to argue about. Therefore as far as you're concerned, its impossible to make my point. You, on the other hand, have entirely failed to defend your position that the foundation is solid evidence that no paranormal powers exist.

      You have no evidence about their motivations. You only have your own speculation based on projecting your ideals onto his organization.

      Ah projections. In fact, I have never heard of them before today, so its a little difficult to form any opinions of them besides what they present themselves. And wow, when it comes to projecting your ideals onto others and then attacking them based on that, stone throwing in glass houses should be discouraged.

      What's left is the equivalent of you trying to prove that santa claus might exist .

      It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it... Aristotle. No, thats what you want me to try and prove. You feel so strongly about this that you attack it even where it does not exist. You are aware there is a clinical term for that?

      But it's NOT science to speculate about what they might be.

      From everything you have come out with so far, your definition of science might need a little work. And quite a few fields of science are highly speculative.

      The randi foundation is about debunking pseudoscience, which paranormal activity is.

      Nah. Its about waving a million dollars around and collecting donations from people like you. It never has and never will find any paranormal powers, because in doing so it would cease to exist. Your first comment was entitled "snicker", and your immediate response to my comment was to accuse me of being dishonest in some way. Your adherence to rational debate is flighty at best, and you are prone to going off on wild tangents to areas where you feel safer. There is no part of my statement that you have disproved, and at best you have managed a lengthy quotation from the terms and conditions on the randi site.

      Its seriously not worth my time to consider your commentary any further, unless it is for comic relief.

    24. Re:Fishy by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      the Randi people would be in at the sub-basement level of the investment opportunity of a lifetime.

      Who on earth says the psychics would give them any part of their soon to be earned fortune? If I was a psychic I sure as hell wouldn't give them the time of day, never mind a percentage.

      but just stop to ponder how much money a relaible phsycic could make from the insurance companies, for example, or how much money there would be in actually being able to talk to the dead.

      Eh can you say with any certainty that this has not already happened?

    25. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      "Its seriously not worth my time to consider your commentary any further, unless it is for comic relief."

      Then don't. You seem to under some delusion that you are "winning" an argument.

      "Your adherence to rational debate is flighty at best, and you are prone to going off on wild tangents to areas where you feel safer. "

      Pot, meet kettle.

      Seriously, you have ignored some of the excellent points made by others on this subject. Several have pointed out to you very good reasons why your financial argument has no basis. I don't feel it necessary to copy them here as I trust you are able to read. What is clear is that you pick and choose what you want to debate.

      But, I'll paraphrase for you. There is FAR MORE FINANCIAL VALUE in proving paranormal power than in refuting frauds. If the sole purpose of the foundation were financial gain then they would be FAR better off to try and find a GENUINE EXAMPLE.

      Somehow I think this is personal for you. Is your mom a psychic or something?

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    26. Re:Fishy by m00nun1t · · Score: 1

      My mod points just expired... if I still had them, I'd mod you up for this. Well said.

    27. Re:Fishy by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, no one ever proved that Daniel Dunglas Home was a fraud.

      That's a myth that started because the scientist William Crookes investigated Home and claimed he was genuine. Crookes got it wrong about plenty of other fake mediums too, but for some reason, the "infallible" Home myth persists.

      Try reading "The Case of Daniel Dunglas Home and William Crookes" by Gordon Stein, if you're interested.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    28. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      "Who on earth says the psychics would give them any part of their soon to be earned fortune?"

      Who said that would be the source of the fortune? One psychic isn't enough for the world. Once psychic ability is proven (snicker) REAL!!! The randi institute will help you to locate GENUINE psychics. As the parent said

      "the Randi people would be in at the sub-basement level of the investment opportunity of a lifetime"

      I can hear the radio spot now

      "Don't be fooled by imitators, the Randi Foundation will help you find a GENUINE psychic. We have over FOURTY years of experience in outing charlatans"

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    29. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is FAR MORE FINANCIAL VALUE in proving paranormal power than in refuting frauds. No, there's a far more chance that you'll end up in a windowless room being experimented on...in the name of national security. Or wind up proving yourself to every moron like you that inists YOU are going to be the one to refute the claim. Oh sure, every neurotic idiot out there will claim being psychic or "gifted" to get 15 minutes of fame. But there's a reason why the people with real gifts/abilities/whatever don't reveal themselves...Nobody wants to be viewed as an insect. "No public displays of power." It's the first rule you learn.

    30. Re:Fishy by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      "No public displays of power."

      Let me guess, you learn this at those psychic conventions. BTW: Why are there signs that tell you how to get to psychic conventions?

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    31. Re:Fishy by Da3vid · · Score: 1

      Even though the Randi foundation may not be the vehicle for proof, I think it does do a good job for showing us that the people who claim to have paranormal powers (not including people who merely believe that paranormal powers do or could possibly exist) don't have the capacity (or desire) to show the powers they claim to have. I think if people have the ability to make use of paranormal powers, if they exist, that we do not have the ability at this time. I grant the possibility (even if I personally consider many paranormal powers extremely unlikely) that in the future it may be so. If we did have the ability to use such powers now (as a lot of people claim to), why not do it in a controlled environment?

    32. Re:Fishy by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      So if we can't as yet demonstrate ESP powers with what we have now then what are all these people who claim to be working with ESP doing ?

      When we discovered Radio Waves we were able to prove their existence and everyone throughout the world was able to repeat experiments proving their existence, the same with quantum theory.

      What didn't happen with either Radio Waves or Quantum theory was for hundreds of years before their 'official discovery' for hundreds of people to roam the country charging people money to witness the marvel of their amazing Radio & Quantum powers.

      So maybe there is a natural mechanism which could explain ESP and other Psychic Powers and maybe in 200 years time we will discover how it works and how to use it but until then supporting hundreds of thousands of con merchants and charlatans who are unable to offer any proper scientific proof for their claims is not helping anybody.

    33. Re:Fishy by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Speaks volumes? ...Sure. But you too are making an assumption. - Everybody don't value money that greatly. It is quite plausible that someone rationally weights the benefit they'd gain from the boost to their personal economy against having their private life continously invaded after the fact.
      Then again it would only take one who's "doing it for the money". Unfortunately now we're entering the field of statistic, (unless there is some hidden modifier involved). Statistics and reality are two very different things.

      So in conclusion, summa sumarum, and most prominently "thusly": I dunno shit.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    34. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that really says it all folks.
      The same sort of thing you get from the creationists.
      Well I heard from a friend that such and such an evolutionary biologist admitted to the impossibility of it.
      Inevitably when this obscure reference is tracked down, it is shown to be false.

      I.E. - your lack of skepticism and investigatory ability masquerading as open-mindedness.
      And stop inserting words in perfectly functional sentences.

    35. Re:Fishy by robertjw · · Score: 1

      At the very least, it is proof that even if there are "paranormal" effects out there that nobody understands, none of the current crop of practicioners are anything but frauds.

      So, what if there are 'paranormal' effects out there that just can't be reproduced in a scientific setting? Giant Pandas are almost impossible to breed in captivity, does that mean they don't breed in the wild? That no Giant Pandas have ever been born, just because it's difficult to do in a lab?

      I'm not advocating any kind of stance to the paranormal, just stating that sometimes things exist even if they can't be proven.

  33. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by spatenbrau · · Score: 1

    If you really think ghosts and all are fake, then how about this: put up, say $1000 of your own money to the first person to scientifically prove they exist. You wouldn't do it right? Because you know you'd be out $1000.

    James Randy aka "The Amazing Randy" (a retired stage magician) has put up 1000x that -- a cool 1 million to the first person that can demonstrate any of these paranormal claims. If someone could get a ghost to strut around for the test, I'm sure they could pick up a bit of spare change.

  34. probably just psychosis by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1
    Major mood disorders that may include positive psychotic symptoms (EG manic depression type one, schizoaffective bipolar type, various schizophrenia subtypes) also include insomnia or nocturnal circadium rhythms for those afflicted with one of these diseases. Therefore, crazy people have an edge over everyone else in learning computers over their years as they are awake often when everyone else is asleep and without distraction or anything else to do than mess with the computer. The sleep abnormality may start in early childhood while one is still flying under the radar in that they have not had a major episode (these diseases generally bloom around later adolescence).

    Being psychotic means you are either hallucinating (usually visually but sometimes auditorially and olfactorily) or experiencing delusions, or both. A psychotic mind like this may tailor hallucinations to the storyline of delusion. It does not take a New Orleans's flood of serotonin to start believing you are among ghosts or other supernatural things, or even that you are one of those ghosts; and when you start seeing things, no matter how smart you are to realize this is impossible, it's time to call the ghostbusters because that is what you believe you're experiencing. Even after the episode ends and the flying saucers are gone, the memory of the episode holds it to be as vivid as you thought while experiencing it.

    Wrapping up, all's I'm sayin' is that whereas the belief in the supernatural is something is associated with less intelligence and seeing ghosts in this particular instance is possible if you have one of these diseases, and almost 20% of the population does (many of whom don't comply with being medicated), it is resolved that people who report this stuff are either just goofing or they were nuts. OTOH, if you're alone and you don't know you're crazy, from an existential perspective you might as well write off the ghosts as being ghosts. There's a little Satre for you.

    1. Re:probably just psychosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahem. mental illness is not the same thing as "less intelligence." although i have to agree that superstitious people are different in many ways from normal, mentally healthy folk. superstitions are related to lack of education, and the need to come up with explanations for things. "why isn't it raining this summer - oh, god must be mad at us, time to sacrifice a virgin," etc.

  35. A spectre is haunting my office desktop by ir0b0t · · Score: 1, Troll

    Its the spectre of open source.

    All the powers of unix are pressed into struggle to exorcise this spectre: GNU and BSD; Apple and Linux; hackers and crackers; script kiddies and my grandmother who can't even use an aol client and wishes she could have her old typewriter back.

    Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as open source by its opponents in Richmond?

    It is high time that open source advocates openly publish their views and their aims and meet this nursery tale of open source with a party manifesto.

    . . .

    Brrr . . . spooky . . . .

    Happy Halloween!

    --
    I'm laughing at clouds.
    1. Re:A spectre is haunting my office desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as open source by its opponents in Richmond?

      Redmond, dear. Redmond.

    2. Re:A spectre is haunting my office desktop by ir0b0t · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Redmond . . . .

      --
      I'm laughing at clouds.
  36. Office haunted? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know you can turn that "Clippy" guy off right?

    1. Re:Office haunted? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Ha!
      Oddly enough, that didn't work for me.
      The haunting noises only went away after I set the windows sound scheme to "No Sounds"
      But that still doesn't stop this loud beep that my computer makes every now and then. Creepy right?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Office haunted? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      My g/f's laptop makes some bizarre screeching noise every now and then for no appearant reason, and it isnt drive failure or other hardware stuff. What's worse is it happens under every OS that's put on it!

    3. Re:Office haunted? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Tell your g/f to stop screeching at her laptop.

      --
      Why not fork?
    4. Re:Office haunted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know. I turned it off, removed the DLL, and overwrote those sectors of the disk with a cryptographically secure deletion utility. Yet every Halloween I still see glimpses of Clippy in the corners of the screen, slithering through windows and then it's gone. I'm quite sure there's a natural explanation for it, however...

    5. Re:Office haunted? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Aliasing from the monitor refresh that's resonating with something?

      --
      I am trolling
    6. Re:Office haunted? by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "My g/f's laptop makes some bizarre screeching noise every now and then for no appearant reason, and it isnt drive failure or other hardware stuff. What's worse is it happens under every OS that's put on it!"

      The squealing noise is a chipset or CPU fan failing.

  37. Re:There are no ghosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to disagree. A simpleton does not have to be religious.

  38. Sounds like hell by pellik · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't imagine a much worse fate then having to hang out at work forever after I die.

    1. Re:Sounds like hell by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      Imagine having to hang out at work after you die without your favorite red stapler.

      Shit I'd probably haunt the place too.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  39. No surprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I looked at the title of this story and thought to myself: Who would have submitted something this stupid?

    I glanced down and low and behold: Zonk.

  40. I used to work.. by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..in a train station that was a waypoint for moving the dead in the American Civil War, as well as being the site of a new bride's suicide. At night. Graveyard shift. Still creeps me out.

    1. Re:I used to work.. by Koil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now that actually sounds kinda cool...

      I was watching the Bravo channel last night, and they were running down the list of 100 best scary movie etc....there were some real gems in there that I need to go back and check out.

      Back to the point of your post is that I normally don't get "freaked out" by movies...I'll occasionally get the jump kinda reaction , but never really the scared feeling until I was about 25 or so....now I can freak myself out if I just think about a certain fear for too long...

      My biggest fear ever, and this is clearly from too much tv, but is to be in a room with lots of windows and no blinds. (I can't sleep in a room without something covering the windows).

      I have this fear that (in true horror movie fashion) that I will look over at the window (dark outside of course) and there will be nothing there, look away and then look back to someone (thing) pressed against the glass.

      Think about this for longer than 5 minutes and I suddenly have a need to go find a bar thats open late...

    2. Re:I used to work.. by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Oh, and it was also part of an escape route from a slave auction house a few hundred yards away. Tunnels in the sub-basement you see.

    3. Re:I used to work.. by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "I have this fear that (in true horror movie fashion) that I will look over at the window (dark outside of course) and there will be nothing there, look away and then look back to someone (thing) pressed against the glass."

      Call me fickle, but all I can imagine pressing against the window is SpongeBob SquarePants giving me one of his big goofy grins!

    4. Re:I used to work.. by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      I used to have more or less the opposite fear... every time I left the house and looked back at a window, I feared seeing something looking back out at me from the empty house. It was such an intense fear that I was sometimes startled when something wasn't there, since I really, really expected it. I dunno why... its more or less gone now.

    5. Re:I used to work.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your fear may be gone now. But the thing inside your house isn't.

    6. Re:I used to work.. by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Oh, you're likely right. I moved.

  41. We have a ghost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It keeps sticking the staff in the ass and seems to show up bent out of shape on your chair.
    Somebody told me it came from the computers and calls itself Clippy.

  42. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, no one's doing it because we'd then have a big debate over whether they evolved or were intelligently designed.

  43. Fuck Forbes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An anti Open Source mouthpiece for the Micros~1 ogranization is all.

  44. My office is haunted on pay day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For some reason my office is haunted on pay day. Everyone disappears and the pay cheque net value has a bunch of ghostly stuff in it reducing it's value. The ghost told me tax freedom day was June 29th this year but expecting it to be extended towards October 30th after the liberals get a majority government in February.

    Or maybe that was my breath talking, at $13mmdf at the NYMEX hub the heat will be low in the office this winter.

  45. my house by clragon · · Score: 0

    when i moved into my new house i thought it was haunted >. whenever i go upstairs and turn in a 90 degree angle into the bed room, i can see in the corner of my eyes a shadow going up the stairs. it's so freaky and i can see it all the time. after a while nothing happend and i think it is just a optical illusion than a ghost because it only happens at the stair case when i turn a certain way. but the experience was frightening the first time. that was my one and only (fortunately) "ghost" encounter. i laughed at the last part of the article, so many people hate M$ lol...

  46. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    If you really think ghosts and all are fake, then how about this: put up, say $1000 of your own money to the first person to scientifically prove they exist. You wouldn't do it right? Because you know you'd be out $1000.

    I think that ghosts exist outside the realm of science. I personally have seen a ghost on one occasion and some other form of spirit (not including alcohol) on another. On several other occasions I have seen what I believe to be a ghost but I am not sure. I place them in a category of events that include UFO sightings and religious apparitions (of, say the Virgin Mary).

    My own theory is that there is some occult boundary that exists between the unconscious aspects of ourselves and the manifest world that science studies. In this model, UFO's,* ghosts, etc. exist in this aspect of us and are a part of the human condition.

    * There are structural similarities in stories of lights seen in the sky and related abductions even if material aspects of the descriptions vary with the ages. These have lead me to believe that the storylines are universal while the descriptions of the beings behind them exist only in our minds.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  47. There were 2 ghosts reported at my former job by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    It was when I worked one summer at Bucsh Gardens in Tampa. I looked for the ghost and couldn't find it and asked alot of employees about it.

    Rumor has it that Crown Colony house is haunted with a little girl who choked on some chicken a few decades ago on the third floor. She can be seen towards halloween waving to guests and is occionsally reported by employees at other times of the year.

    I asked about this from people who worked at the Crown Colony house and results were mixed. More likely rumors but one security supervisor who refuses to go in at night said he hired an African Vodooist as a security guard. He can hear hear spirits and said heard the cries of a girl. Also plates have moved and the beer fountains occasionally go off on their own with no explanation.

    The other is an appiration of a someone lieing down ona bench near the old brewery at the hospitality house. Turns out a guy drank a large amount of beer and died with a heartattack on the bench.

    I don't know about these rumors but they are interesting to say the least. I do not know if its psychological but I do get a very errie feeling of uncomfort when I enter the colony house on the top floors.

    1. Re:There were 2 ghosts reported at my former job by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      Dude, I've been to busch gardens, and it was just me. I can make myself invisble thru my mind powers. I sneak in at nite, scarf all the free beer, then pass out on the bench. When I sleep, my subconcious has trouble staying invisible, and I kinda fade in and out from view. But as soon as someone comes near, I start to wake up, make myself invisible again, and hence, fade from view. (then I go back to my usual home, at the sorrority house).

      Hope this clears things up! Sorry to cause any trouble!

    2. Re:There were 2 ghosts reported at my former job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to live across the street from Toys R Us in Sunnyvale, CA, and there was this local legendabout a ghost that haunted the store there.

  48. like... MS Office? by linforcer · · Score: 1

    When I read the title I just thought: "No I don't use MS Office"

  49. No need to sue by Apreche · · Score: 1

    There's no need to sue anybody if you have a haunted house. In fact, I'd love to buy a house that was actually haunted. That way I could win the million dollar prize.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  50. If you want scary stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One time, I was alone in my office and I smelled a fart that wasn't mine.

  51. We think it is. by evilnissan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Our office is in a old train station / depot..

    I have been working the night shift on and off for the past four years here and most of the time it just seems like a empty building.. But every once in a while you can look out the window of the computer room in to the hallway and see a shadow pass and no one here out there or even in the building..

    I have walked down the hallway and had cold chills run up my back. The wost spot is when your in the bathroom and you can here doors out in the hallway open in shut and no one is here except for me and the other operator that has to stay in the computer room. (manned 24/7)

    The worst account I can remember is from a exworker named Sheneika, she left the computer room and went to the bathroom,, about 3 minuets later she came running in to the computer room cussing the other worker for banging the hell out the the bathroom door.. Ted said he didnt do it ad didnt leave the room.

    So they start checking the sercurity cameras. ( I work in a lottery office)

    So they look at the cameras and watch Sheneika walk down to the bathroom and about 3 minuets later she comes tearing out of the bathroom running full steam back in to the computer room.. Ted never heard any noise but she said it was like some one kicking in the door.

    This place will give you the creeps.

    --
    This Sig for rent.
  52. just a good old halloween story I got... by app13b0y · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Bob is a analyst at a security operations center for an ISP. He sent me this email and I decided I'd pass it on to you guys for review. Is this even possible? I'm not sure, but it sure did freak Bob out. He can't bring himself to go back to the SOC anymore, and he's looking for telecommuting jobs on Monster. --Alice)

    Alice,
    I know you're gonna think I'm crazy but you're the only one I can think who would possibly listen to what I'm about to say without immediately dismissing it. Please, read my whole account of what happened to me tonight before writing me off.

    I went into work last night for the graveyard shift. Yeah, graveyard shift on Halloween, haha. We'd just ramped up to 24/7 ops the previous week so this was going to be my first night alone in the SOC. I was pretty excited at first, since I wouldn't have any of these other knuckleheads in my hair while I was doing some hard core analysis, you know? I logged into my station, started some queries for deltas in the previous 24, and went to get some coffee, since it was going to be a long night.

    Little did I know...

    After returning to the SOC with my joe, Carol gave me the briefing on the days events (in a nutshell, nothing - apparently all the s'kiddies were gearing up for Trick or Treating and not harassing us). She did mention something that didn't show up in any of the reports though - a general "weirdness" to the traffic in the DMZ. She couldn't really qualify it, but she said she though something kind of odd was going on. Okay Carol, I'll keep my eyes open (as I roll them back into my head). She punched out and I was all alone.

    Or was I?

    I threw some tunes on WinAmp and started to rock out while pouring over the output of my earlier queries. My attempts at scripting up some rudimentary anomaly detection in our aggregation console appeared to be woefully inadequate or simply functioning properly with a dearth of anomalies when I saw it.

    A new host in the DMZ.

    A host which had apparently come up at midnight local, October 31st. Who the hell stands up a box in the DMZ at *midnight* on a Saturday night? It had to be the mouth-breathers in development relying on the assumption that no one would be monitoring the network over the weekend. Heh, nice try chumps, but you've just tweaked the wrong BOFH. To cover my bases, I looked up the latest network diagrams for the DMZ. Just as I thought, nothing authorized or even submitted regarding a new box in the DMZ. Finally, after months of slaving away over reports I was going to get to demand someone take a box down. I could feel the power coursing through my fingertips as I began to compose the flame to end all flames.

    "Dear clownboats,"

    I hesitated. What would they come back with? I needed more ammunition to stave off a possible counteroffensive. I decide to scan the box, to see how much risk these "developers" were actually exposing my DMZ to. A quick nmap returned results the likes of which I had not seen since my days at that dot bomb in Sunnyvale.

    "Remote operating system guess: Linux 2.0.35-37"

    W

    T

    F

    Two-oh? Was this some sort of prank? These guys are dullards to be sure, but no one is this stupid. It's gotta be some sort of security through ob-fu or something. I had to know. Telnetting quickly confirmed my worst fears.

    Trying 10.31.10.31...
    Connected to 10.31.10.31.
    Escape character is '^]'.

    Red Hat Linux release 5.2 (Apollo)
    Kernel 2.0.36 on an i486
    login:

    I stared, dumfounded, at the prompt's ever-blinking cursor. I tried to wrap my head around what I was seeing. Red Hat FIVE DOT FSKING TWO? Even if this was a honeypot, this was ridiculous. What were they trying to do, find out which kiddie has the oldest sploits?

    I did what any sane security professional would do in my situation.

    I typed "root".

    The box retorted with "Password:"

    I reiterated, "root".

    [root@zion root]#

    A chill crept out of my keyboard and up my spine as I realized that

    1. Re:just a good old halloween story I got... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is gold! GOLD! and a great ending!

    2. Re:just a good old halloween story I got... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i loved this. you made my night a bit nicer, posting this.

    3. Re:just a good old halloween story I got... by dasheiff · · Score: 1

      I always wondered exactly what Neo did before he became the one. Also, that's probally the best ghost story ever.

    4. Re:just a good old halloween story I got... by Kris_B_04 · · Score: 1

      Beautiful!! Just what I needed on this hectic End of Month full of the usual BS Monday! (And why AM I working on Halloween? Couldn't I just claim a religious holiday or something?)

      Thanks! :)

      Kris

      --
      Remember when Windows were washed, mice were trapped and UNIX guarded the harem?
    5. Re:just a good old halloween story I got... by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      This is priceless!!!! It is too cute for words. Now I'm sitting her trying to rack my brain for any reasons this could be possible. Thanks for the laugh - this is just too cute. :)

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    6. Re:just a good old halloween story I got... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Excellent! But don't you have a little time discrepancy in there? :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  53. old VA hospital by synx · · Score: 1

    My company's HQ is an old VA's hospital. I don't work in that particular building, but I've heard the 'older' side of the building haunted. The building has a 'main' portion and a newer front that was built onto in part to hold the older part up and give it structural re-enforcement.

    One of the floors was apparently for ... the crazy people. Doors are apparently thicker than all the other floors. I've never spent enough time in the building to investigate that however.

    Perhaps I should go visit there... tonight... at 2am... dun dun dunnnn

  54. paranormal and proving it.... by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you can't accept the Randi foundation as fair and unbiased in testing the paranormal, what alternatives do you think are better?

    It seems to me this is a group which has given more thought than anyone else to applying science and logic to the whole thing. I don't think they're necessarily less motivated to hand over their prize money than anyone else would be who offered something like that up? I mean, no - nobody probably wants to give away a million bucks that's earning them a tidy sum of interest in a bank account someplace. But the claim that the Randi foundation would just "go away" if they had to give away the prize seems blatantly false. They'd simply be able to continue doing what they've done .... proving that 99.9% of the claims of having ESP, paranormal "powers" and so forth are fraudulent. If they were only able to find one real psychic after all these years, that wouldn't really change much for them, other than Randi having to admit that he finally found 1 isolated instance of someone having a power he never before believed really existed. That would probably make them look MORE legitimate, as it would heighten everyone's interest in finding out who is a scam and who isn't.

    1. Re:paranormal and proving it.... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      If you can't accept the Randi foundation as fair and unbiased in testing the paranormal, what alternatives do you think are better?

      I'm not at all sure, but I reckon something not financially motivated would be a good start.

      that wouldn't really change much for them,

      No, I don't really see it. If one person comes in and claims the million with a solid esp power, everyone else with the same power or similar would land on them and they would have to give out a whole lot more millions. Besides, it wouldn't be the first time that financial considerations have held back valuable information.

    2. Re:paranormal and proving it.... by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would a person with actual esp want to claim a million by exposing themselves as having real powers? They can get enough money to set themselves up for life by getting the numbers to a decent lottery draw, and nobody need know anything other than that they were very lucky, once.

      If I could read minds and/or predict the future i sure as hell wouldn't want anyone to know about it.

    3. Re:paranormal and proving it.... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      They can get enough money to set themselves up for life by getting the numbers to a decent lottery draw

      Maybe they already have? In either case, its still not making the Randi foundation's claims any stronger, nor the claims of anyone that points to them as the last word in paranormal investigation.

    4. Re:paranormal and proving it.... by ankarbass · · Score: 2, Informative

      "No, I don't really see it. If one person comes in and claims the million with a solid esp power, everyone else with the same power or similar would land on them and they would have to give out a whole lot more millions."

      Each person would have to pass a test. There is nothing that says they have to just start giving out a million dollars to everyone who claims to have a certain power. So far none have even passed the preliminary test.

      "Besides, it wouldn't be the first time that financial considerations have held back valuable information."

      I'm pretty sure that if a paranormal wanted to be tested by the randi foundation purely for the betterment of science and NOT take the million dollars that he'd accept. Further, I suspect the test would be no different. Remember, the randi foundation doesn't do the testing. That's done by universities and other houses of reason.

      All of this is a red herring of course. Because there has not been a single repeatable successful paranormal experiment in all of science history. No valuable information is being held back for "financial reasons". What is true, is that financial movitavation is the ONLY reason "paranormals" exist in the first place. If you want a solid theory of why they exist, science isn't needed, look no further than Econ 101.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    5. Re:paranormal and proving it.... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Okay, can we please keep this to one thread? Jumping around like this is giving a paranormal challenge to my inner ear. I've already answered your other points several times at this stage, so I'll just take out the one thing I haven't dealt with yet...

      That's done by universities and other houses of reason.

      Actually, no, from what I read on the site there are similar organisations in other countries that offer money for proof of paranormal powers, therefore their opinions are just as suspect. Unfortunately these are the ones that the Randi organisation goes to for "unbiased third party" decisions. The word franchise comes to mind. In any case, it's not proving anything if the foundation can pick the judge and jury. I mean come on.

    6. Re:paranormal and proving it.... by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      4.3. What should I expect during the application process?

      You should expect a lot of (written) communication between yourself and the JREF. You should also expect to do a bit of traveling for the actual test, unless you happen to live in an area with an established skeptical group or expert, or in close proximity to a University that might agree to assist both yourself and the JREF in testing your claim.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
  55. Yes it is by ack_call · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The building where I work is located on a site that is known as Gallows Hill. Hangings used to take place there many, many years ago. There have been reports from cleaners stating that whilst cleaning the building at night when the offices are mainly empty; a cleaner has had her feather duster removed form her hand by an unseen force and she has been repeatedly beaten round the face with it. Another report was from a cleaner who whilst cleaning the toilets was confronted by a man with a bloodied face - she ran screaming from the wash room (apparently) and when her colleagues investigated there was nobody there. Neither of the cleaners returned, they both quit. The office is now a complete mess.

  56. yes it's huanted by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    My workplace is haunted by the evil spirit of my alive boss.

  57. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

    In this model, UFO's,* ghosts, etc. exist in this aspect of us and are a part of the human condition.

    Its called imagination...

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  58. One customer has a creepy building by totallygeek · · Score: 1
    So, here are the things that bug me about the lawfirm where my company is contracted to work. This building used to be a federal courthouse and post office. It is very old and the cracked wood around the windows whistles with the wind. There are crawlspaces between the floors for the old postmaster to use, and in the basement are old holding cells, boiler (heater), coal chute, and other funky stuff. To boot, the server room is an old magistrate office, and the servers are in the "closet", which was a holding cell. The bars have not been removed from the window!
    • So, one night Joel and I are working in offices next to each other separated by a wall with an open door. In Joel's room is an open doorway into the hallway, which I can see out through the open door between us and the open doorway to the hall. I see something move by the hall doorway, and call out to Joel. He answers and I tell him I saw something go by the doorway. He says for me to shut up and get back to work. Then, something goes by again; mind you I am seeing this via peripheral vision. When I mention this one, Joel is getting freaked. We investigate, and find that a bat is flying around the file room and occasionally makes it out to the hallway, up and down, and back into the file room.
    • Working late one night there and have my friend Alan to keep me company while waiting for a backup to finish. So, we are in the middle of the law library playing cards when I hear the heavy outer door open downstairs. I wouldn't expect anyone there past midnight, so I go out to the stair railing and see there is no one and the door is shut. I go back into the main room, and immediately rush back out, hearing the door again. There was nothing there! Alan will not go back there anymore.
    • Joel and I are working late and hear some noises. We are leaving that night and one night owl attorney is coming in. He laughs when we tell him how freaky the building is. He then relays that the postmaster shot himself in the room where we had hear the noises and that there have been reports of a ghost climbing the stairs.
    • Now, the funniest! One night I am working on the third floor and all the hallway (long hallway -- the one with the bat) lights had gone out (bad wiring, old bulbs, etc). So, I am finished checking out some Samba issues from a Windows computer, and I click Start, Shutdown. I am not usually the Windows kinda guy and this is the first time I have worked on this computer. I turn off the monitor and leave because the computer will power off from the shutdown request. Halfway down the hall, I hear an eerie "bye bye" and I flee. Talk about being freaked out! The next day I am laughing about it with the paralegal whose computer I had worked on (called to make sure she was working as expected). She then fires up her control panel (or whatever) to play me her shutdown sound. Apparently she had downloaded some cartoon sounds and this was some screechy voice saying "bye bye".
  59. 'Haunting" experiences in the office by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've had a couple of 'spooky' occurances at my previous job. I was often the last one to leave, so it was up to me to turn out all the lights and lock up. There was a spot in the hallway where if I came around the corner at the right speed, I'd see the outline of a human figure for a brief moment. The weird thing was, I could almost recognize the form. Somehow I recognized it as a coworker that had left the company long before that! I hadn't been in touch with him for over a year. Was he coming back to tell me something? Well, at least he was smiling, just as I always remembered him.

    Another night ... same thing, doing my rounds, turning out the lights. Then I noticed the building across the street. There was a figure in the window that was standing perfectly still. I could barely see it, but I could definitely see its eyes. It freaked me out. This was in downtown Portland. This is an area of town full of 'historic' buildings, including the one I was working in. Was some spectre looming around? Well, it was easy to believe that considering it was night time and nobody else was about. Very creepy.

    Welp, now for the anti-climactic bit. Niether were ghosts. The outline of a figure I saw? Trick of the eye. That corner had some boxes and loose stuff piled up. Looking straight on at the pile, it didn't look anything remotely like my coworker. I think what happened was a trick of my peripheral vision. As most of you know, the outer areas of human eyes are keen on detecting motion more than they are with recognizing images. Can't claim to be an expert on the topic, but I think the human brain is constantly looking to recongize patterns, and when it finds one that seems to be relevent, it fills in the blanks. Hence, I saw my coworker. If anybody's curious, he's alive and well.

    I suppose I could go into a little more detail about my theory here. There's a technique called 'EVP'. It's used to record the voices of ghosts. If you ever get bored one night, do a search for EVP and find some samples. It isn't definitive proof of the existance of ghosts, but at the very least it's a fun way to kill an evening. (usually there are stories attached to these sounds...) I visited a site once that had a number of EVP samples. Unfortunately, ghost speech isn't terribly easy to make out. Though it does sound human, it's barely more than garbled garbage. What they did was they presented a sound and said "first you listen to it and then try to work out what it's saying, then click on this link to see suggestions of what people think they've heard." The reason they do this is to prevent you from being 'suggested' into believing what you're hearing. After listening to a bit, I worked out why. The sound file downloaded and looped over and over again. I couldn't make it out. Then I read the first suggestion. Suddenly, I was hearing it! Neat! Then I read the second suggestion. And.. wait.. now I'm hearing that one. They were two very different sentences. As a matter of fact, I thought I could hear a different inflection in the words used by the 'ghost' that time around! It was the same sound looping over and over again, but now it was sounding different. Okay, I took the scenic route to this point, but I think what I was hearing was not the sound directly, but my perception of the sound. My brain thought it heard a particular sentence, so that's exactly what made it into my conscience mind. I think the sight of my coworker was a similar phenomenon.

    And the figure across the street? Somebody with an odd sense of humor. It's a cardboard cutout. For whatever reason, they put it up against the window on the 3rd story of the building. The light was dim enough that it was very tough to make out, but the next day I was able to see it quite clearly. I mentioned seeing his eyes. It felt like they were following me almost. Again, trick of the eye.

    I don't know what I think about ghosts. I can't say I firmly believe they exist, I can't say they don'

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:'Haunting" experiences in the office by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        In a couple of the large apartment buildings I've worked in/lived in, I've often misinterpreted the sound of water gurgling thru pipes as being human speech. If it's muted enough by distance and obstacles it can sound a lot like two people talking on the other side of a wall. Same sort of thing, the mind tends to "fill in the blanks". (Once I caught one of the more eerie noises on a tape deck and when played back they sounded like... water gurgling thru pipes :)

      Cheers,
      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  60. Re:There are no ghosts by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    There's no such thing as the supernatural. Everything that exists, or is possible, is also as natural as everything else.

  61. phantom typing by serutan · · Score: 1

    A programmer I used to work with told me about a weird experience he had while working for an old bank in a small town in southern Oregon. One evening he was working late, when he noticed the sound of someone typing on a typewriter. It was muffled as if coming from in another room, and kind of slow, like someone who doesn't type very well and uses one finger.

    After a while he got up for a stretch, and when he walked around the office he noticed everybody else had gone home. When he went back to his desk he heard the typing again, and realized that was coming from behind a door that he had never seen opened. He went over to the door and opened it, and found that it was a closet containing some boxes of files. On top of the pile of boxes sat an old black manual typewriter.

    The frustrating thing is that there was no paper in the typewriter, and instead of rolling a piece of paper into it he just shut the door and went home. He never mentioned this to anybody at the bank because he was afraid they would think he was weird. I would love to have been there and put in a piece of paper to see what it would say. On the other hand I might have been to freaked to stick around.

  62. I'd happily trade for a couple of Ghosts by Belseth · · Score: 1

    My computer is full of Gremlins. Does that count?

  63. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by arose · · Score: 1

    It's impossible to show that something supernatural exists because of this. Once it's proven it's not supernatural anymore.

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  64. Is your office haunted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  65. Portland courthouse by serutan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A woman I know used to do a lot of security jobs. When she was working for the City of Portland there were lots of rumors that the courthouse was haunted. The upper floors were spooky at night, and nobody particularly liked working the late shift there. One night one of their security guards was making his rounds when he saw someone in a sort of hooded robe standing at the far end of a hallway, apparently messing with a door as if trying to unlock it. The guard said something to challenge the person, when the figure suddenly rushed down the hall at him as if flying. He braced himself to get tackled, but whatever it was either went by him or through him, and when he turned to give chase there was nobody there. No sounds of fleeing footsteps, no doors opening and closing, nothing.

    The other thing is that this guy was a real veteran security guard who had worked there for many years, very level-headed and dependable. But that night he left the building and went home without even clocking out, then called in to say that he was quitting and never going back. He wouldn't even report to the building during the daytime to turn in his keys and other stuff. His supervisor had to go to his house and pick them up.

  66. Re:There are no ghosts by arose · · Score: 1

    Residual energy? The body contains quite a few joules, but I doubt that's what you had in mind.

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  67. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ---
    There's a spider on your shoulder


    that's no spider, you are being touched by His Noodly Appendage.

  68. Hickam AFB by Cerebus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many of the buildings at Hickam AFB in Honolulu still have the spalling from the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. The PACAF NOSC is (was) in one of these buildings. I was told while I was there that in the room the NOSC occupied 6 men lost their lives during the attack. Allegedly there were sightings after hours of these men.

    Even if it isn't spooky it's certainly both sobering and historic.

    --
    -- Cerebus
  69. "glamour of corporate life" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Of course they want corporate life. They're discorporate now and they don't like it.

    (Hint: look up the definitions of "corporate".)

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  70. Actually - YES! by GooseKirk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My former office was an old Victorian house on a bluff overlooking the waterfront. It was originally built by the mayor of my town, and for twenty years it was the best restaurant in town. The woman who owned my company bought the building, and she had me oversee the extensive renovations to make it into an office. Great work if you can get it. I loved this building. I even got to pick out my own office (naturally, I got a water view - not bad for being the IT geek).

    But everyone in town "knew" the house was haunted. I talked to several people who used to work there when it was a restaurant, and one of my friends actually lived in the upstairs part for several months. He told me that one night, he heard a loud crash from the kitchen area downstairs. He started to go down the stairs to investigate, and heard a series of identical smashing noises. When he got to the kitchen, a box of fluorescent bulbs had been opened and smashed all over the place. He said he sometimes heard strange noises and often felt uncomfortable there.

    A former waitress told me that several times, she would set down a tray of dishes in one place, turn around, and then when she turned back it would be moved. The former owners told me all kinds of similar ghost stories. Every Halloween the local paper mentions the building as being the most haunted place in town.

    One day, a van full of soldiers on leave from a nearby base pulled up. Apparently, they'd seen my office on some TV show about haunted houses, and had come to check it out. I gave 'em the full tour. One woman, as soon as she set foot upstairs, turned around and went outside to wait in the van. Freaked her out, I guess.

    Now, geek that I am, I was always the last person to leave the building at night. And very often, I stayed until the wee hours, all alone in the building. And not a damn thing ever happened. No weird sounds, no smashing bulbs, absolutely nothing.

    Although I had to admit... I didn't mind going into the scary old basement when I was alone at night, but going upstairs at night used to freak me out something fierce. Dunno why, it was beautiful and well-lit, but damn, it was just creepy. Daytime wasn't so bad, but at night - forget it.

    One night, someone forgot to close a back door properly, and the alarm went off late at night. I showed up to deal with the cops. Since a door was open, they insisted on checking out the building. The cop knew the reputation of the building and was a little spooked himself. When we got upstairs he really got nervous - he told me that he just didn't like it up there. He couldn't believe that I'd work in such a spooky place late at night by myself. I'm like, you're a COP. Which of our jobs is more dangerous?

    I like to think that we did such a good job restoring the house that the ghosts took off. Or maybe I scared the ghosts off. Who knows. I'm still a little disappointed, though, that nothing ever happened while I was there. I figured if there were strange things going on all the time, I'd set up a bunch of webcams and such... but nope.

    Oh yeah, later, I found out that one of the previous owners had passed away in one of the upstairs bedrooms. On the other hand, the first owner died when he fell down the basement steps, and the basement, aside from just being a spooky old basement and crawling with spiders as big as your hand, wasn't nearly as ooky as the upstairs. So go figure.

  71. Yes by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Why, yes, it is... by my boss.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  72. Is my office haunted? by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

    Yes, by specters of intelligence dead and gone, by the skulking shades of competence from days past, by the ghosts of genius too faded and faint to make themselves heard any more...

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  73. Not haunted... want it to be? by ph00dz · · Score: 1

    Maybe whatchoo need is an OfficePoltergeist....

  74. Acupuncture by ankarbass · · Score: 1

    Bob Park had this to say:

    "Here's the picture: a few thousand years before it was known that blood circulates or germs cause disease, doctors who had never dissected a frog, claimed that yin and yang could be balanced by inserting needles into the right points, among the hundreds of points strung along 12 meridians....Scientists suggest the needles stimulate release of endorphins. Jalapeno peppers do the same thing. So it wouldn't matter where you stick the needles would it? Then who needs an acupuncturist?"

    He has a point. Clinical trials suggest that acupuncture controls pain. However, acupuncture claims to work by controlling the balance of yin and yang. This is the paranormal part. You have to control for the endorpine release as well as the placebo and regressive effect. Since practitioners claim yin and yang are beyond the measurement of science, then it is by definition, paranormal.

    from http://skepdic.com/acupunc.html

    "The NCAHF issued a position paper on acupuncture that asserts, "Research during the past twenty years has failed to demonstrate that acupuncture is effective against any disease" and that "the perceived effects of acupuncture are probably due to a combination of expectation, suggestion, counter-irritation, operant conditioning, and other psychological mechanisms." In short, most of the perceived beneficial effects of acupuncture are probably due to mood change, the placebo effect, and the regressive fallacy. Just because the pain went away after the acupuncture doesn't mean the treatment was the cause. Much chronic pain comes and goes. An alternative treatment such as acupuncture is sought only when the pain is near its most severe level. Natural regression will lead to the pain becoming less once it has reached its maximum level of severity. Also, much of the support for acupuncture is anecdotal in the form of testimonial evidence from satisfied customers. Unfortunately, for every anecdote of someone whose pain was relieved by acupuncture there may well be another anecdote of someone whose pain was not relieved by acupuncture But nobody is keeping track of the failures (confirmation bias)."

    --
    Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
  75. local hospital by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    There's a local nursing home which is supposedly haunted. I've never been there, but know someone that works there, and it positively creeps him out.

    It's an older building, one of the first hospitals in the area. It's now a nursing home (as already stated). It's got three wings: the main wing, south wing, and west wing, forming an L shape. The whole building (being a nursing home) has had the doors and windows wired to detect escapees.

    The west wing is permanantly closed off. It's been like this for about 10 years. According to my friend Brandon, the employees won't even go near the wing's entrance at night. He (and another friend who used to work there) said there'd be weird shit that would go on randomly at night: door alarms would go off, lights would mysteriously get turned on, and various other odd stuff like that. Typical "haunted" stuff.

    Supposedly the west wing used to be used to house crazy people, back before such things took more of a "subdued" treatment approach.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:local hospital by falzer · · Score: 1

      Permanently closed off? Maybe it's possessed by a bunch of bums.

  76. Sometimes though, you gotta wonder.... by Yumi+Saotome · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When I was attending Junior High a long time ago, our social science teacher would tell us stories about how the school was haunted by a ghost that had followed him from a previous job. He went on to say how the ghost was very mischevious and that he would make doors fly open and objects fly. We all laughed and thought his stories were amusing, but we never thought they were real.

    Until one day... during my science class, a vial which was located on an upper shelf inexplicably *levitated* itself to the middle of the classroom in such slow motion that everyone's attention was immediately diverted to this strange phenomenon. Without warning, the vial then flung itself into the chalkboard at the front of the classroom at an extremely high speed, shattering itself.

    That poor science teacher never came back after that. Although I don't believe in ghosts at all, even to this day, I can't explain how in the world something like that could happen, or how something like that could be engineered.

    1. Re:Sometimes though, you gotta wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points (and if I could remember my password), I would mod thee troll, thou troll.

      I call BS!

  77. I don't know by WindBourne · · Score: 1
    There are a few people here who strike me as the type that would create a haunted work place.

    Back when I was in my 20's, one of my research jobs was at Colo. States Anatomy Dept. Next to my lab was the human lab. At the time, the cadavers were stored in 2 portable cadaver coolers that had been used for body transportation from Viet Nam. That is each cooler had had some odd 20K bodies come through it (including several guys that I grew up with).

    Not a big deal, but behind back, when I was at my desk, was an HPLC that would moving slowly, but under high pressure, you discover that it creaks. Needless to say, at 4 am, weird thoughts would go through.

    Besides, you never know what happened at places that you work at. There is a soupersalid northeast of me, that used to be a Chuck E. Cheese's. where nathan dunlap worked. Likewise, kids are back in the Columbine school.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  78. No, no, it's just me guys! by raddan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forbes has the offices one floor below us. Sheesh, I guess that's what I get for stopping by on a Sunday.

  79. Whoa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... okay, I read that as "delicious booty"

  80. Any sightings of the... by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0
  81. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by DoninIN · · Score: 1

    It would be more accurate to say that the existence of the Randi challenge means that there aren't any people who can reproduce a provably paranormal phenomenon on demand. Not that there are no "ghosts" for example, ghosts are for an example notorious for their habits of only showing up when and where they choose and only revealing themselves to people who aren't likely to be believed. There's nothing about the Randi challenge that disproves that your uncle Edwin's best friends third cousin didn't really have a premonition that he shouldn't go to work the day the train derailed and killed everyone on riding it that day. All it suggests is that this person can't reliably replicate this on demand. This sort of thing is actually very damning evidence against the Silvia Browne and John Edwards of the world, but says next to nothing about the reality of one time or non-reliable paranormal events. I'm not even suggesting that those non-reliable events aren't the result of selective thinking, or selective memory or that they really are paranormal in some way. However that there are several prizes to be won with a repeating, provable paranormal power that haven't been claimed isn't proof that no one has ever seen a ghost. Or more accurately that ghosts don't exist.

  82. Naturally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    paying the top marginal rate of tax, plus withholding?

    Ugh, no thanks. ;)

  83. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We have a regular instance of paranormal activty. Often in the morning, I'll start a pot of coffee and come back to get a cup later. Sometimes, when I come back, all the coffee is gone leaving just an empty pot and a faint chill in the air. The scary part is that I ask around: nobody took the last cup! Spooky indeed.

    1. Re:Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My office have an old HP5 printer, which print half way and stop.

      The printer's properties in Windows XP show that it is out-of-paper.

      But the printer's tray are full of paper.

      The only way it will start printing again is when you reboot Windows.

      weird

      Sometimes, it start printing by itself when nobody is in the office.

      The next morning, we will find lots of print outs with weird langauge on it which nobody can understand.

      Now, we always left the office with the paper tray empty and printer switch off.

  84. Angie Milner by Aslan72 · · Score: 1

    Good ghost story:

    I work at Illinois State University and used to work in Williams Hall, which supposedly is haunted by the first librarian @ ISU - Angie Milner. It makes for a pretty creepy building to work in anyway, but I was doing a hardware upgrade one night and ended up @ the building at midnight. As I was leaving, I rounded a corner to go to the door of the parking lot and caught something in the corner of my eye...specifically a figure standing in a doorway...and I ran out of the building at the point :).

    --pete

  85. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, are an idiot.

  86. Swamp ghost by chrisatslashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I grew up near a small southern town of Mercer, TN. There was an old rail road bed that ran through a swampy bottom that looked like something straight out of a horror movie. The story goes that there once was a kid named Toby that was walking down the railroad one night with a lantern and got stuck on a bridge with a train coming. He was killed by the train. Until a few years ago you could drive into the swamp a couple of miles, turn around to face the way you came in, wait, and a bright point of light would appear down the road in the distance.

    This strange light was only know about by a few hunters in the area until around my high-school years. Then a small group of my friends and I found out and would visit the place a few times each year. The word spread and it became a bit of an attraction and even became part of an initiation ceremony for a fraternity at a nearby college. Several of our parents even saw it. This was all in the 90's. Since then the area has been logged and the road has been blocked off.

    I personally saw the light several times. And I know about 2-dozen more that have seen it...kids, youths, adults, professionals, a youth pastor, etc. I am a mechanical engineer so I have studied physics and thermodynamics and have a pretty good grasp on the physical phenomena that might have caused this. I have also studies various "swamp light" phenomena. But I cannot find a plausible explanation for what I saw. I'm not saying that the light was supernatural but I am saying that it is very difficult to explain. For example, I have seen:
    • the light move further away when being chased at 40 mph
    • the light appear between observers deep in the swamp and nearer to the edge with the only access being to pass one of the observers
    • the light sway side to side
    • the light illuminate the inside of a vehicle
    • all observers (4-15 people) in a group see the light and scream simultaneously


    Seeing the light was one of the coolest experiences of my life. I hate that the area was destroyed by logging. Even on nights when we didn't see the light we could still scare the crap out of each other just because of the surroundings.
    --


    Simple people talk of people, better people talk of events, great people talk of ideas.
    1. Re:Swamp ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no way it could have been atmosperic lensing causing light to refract from a nearby road as cars went by?
      There are some pretty cool mirages that can occur when you get thermal inversions etc. of air...

    2. Re:Swamp ghost by chrisatslashdot · · Score: 1

      No...there was a sharp bend in the rail road bed just after it intersected the access road. I inspected the area in the daylight several times to see if there was a street light or drive that could have caused headlights to shine down the trail. But there was nothing remotely line of sight WRT the observation point.

      --


      Simple people talk of people, better people talk of events, great people talk of ideas.
  87. I see "ghosts" every month by cciRRus · · Score: 1

    Here in my lab, we regularly see ghosts on our PCs, especially after they are plagued with spyware, worms and virus. Perhaps the PCs got too sick and died? Oh, by the way, ghosts are named "Norton".

    --
    w00t
  88. Rackmount ghosts by Centurix · · Score: 1

    I remember one of our windows servers used to reboot by itself for no apparant reason. When we went to check it out the rack was locked! Weird!

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Rackmount ghosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, a Windows server? come on now, you can't REALLY be seriously wondering why a 'doze based server would be randomly rebooting... if you want it to work it has to run Linux. even ghosts know that.

  89. Restrooms are commonly haunted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Restrooms are spooky, spooky places. Last week one morning I had just walked into the restroom when I overheard a guy in the stall whose orifice was definitely haunted.

    Needless to say, I fled -- else I would have been swiftly overcome by the evil lurking in that cursed place!

  90. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by bcat24 · · Score: 1

    No, nobody's doing it because then we couldn't argure on Slashdot about why nobody's doing it.

  91. Randi is a fraud. by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Tell you what, I will give you $1 million dollars if you prove evolution is real. Whoa, slow down. Here is your one celled organism, you have 2 weeks to "evolve" a monkey. What? You need more time? ...nope - I make the rules, I, Sera decide what is fair for the paranormal, not you. Is it fair? Certainly it is. Obviously as the scientist in this equation, I have proven that Evolution is false, you have two weeks to evolve a monkey to prove me wrong. No one has evolved a monkey in 20 years so I must be right. Right?

    Point is - if I get to set the test I can always prove you wrong...always. If you really look at the sub-amazing Randi's tests they all are shell games that the house wins. It is no big deal if I offer a million dollars if I know I will win from the get go.

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    1. Re:Randi is a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've clearly never made even a casual effort to understand what the JREF does. No test is performed unless all parties agree on a protocol -- some test that would provide evidence that the person can do what he/she claims to be able to do, when he/she can do it, and with what accuracy. Your evolution example is a straw man. No one who seriously supports evolutionary theory would claim that it could or should be able to be demonstrated artificially in 2 weeks. There are plenty of reasonable tests for evolutionary theory, and they are performed all the time. That is what science *is*.

      The other thing to keep in mind is that the JREF doesn't claim to disprove *anything*. Randi himself put it best (a paraphrase):

      "If you throw one-hundred reindeer off of a skyscraper and watch them all plummet to the earth, you've only proven that that particular one-hundred reindeer either couldn't fly or chose not to."

      In short, Sera, you have no idea what you are talking about.

    2. Re:Randi is a fraud. by spx · · Score: 1

      I agree that people should back their word of something reasonable - that makes sense *real sense*, which explains why the above used a qoute with REINDEER as the subject (good point made, but use a better qoute and get better responses next time). http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=reindeer They dont fly man, do you still believe in Santa too? I hit him with my car tonight...

  92. Proof of the afterlife by ankarbass · · Score: 1

    Crookes was torn between science and his own need to believe in an afterlife. The evaluation of Home happened after the death of Crookes beloved younger brother which might have affected Crookes devotion to science in the face of spiritualism.

    It should not be forgotten that this was a time where many people were looking to science to prove that the afterlife existed. The scientist who could prove such a thing would stand to gain a lot, especially in his own time.

    --
    Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
  93. it was the sushi by aeselvenor · · Score: 1

    that orlando restaurant the article mentions is actually one of my favorite sushi spots, and i can vouch that it is quite good! reasonably priced, too, which probably explains the supernatural appearances.

  94. There are no signs ....!! by pbhj · · Score: 1

    >>>> "Why are there signs that tell you how to get to psychic conventions"

    There are no signs! Tell me, what did you see ...

  95. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Its called imagination...

    Why would the structure of a narrative merely limited to one's personal imagination remain relatively universal across culture and time?

    Note I am talking about the structure of the narrative. The descriptions of the creatures involved, and specific details are filled in with culturally consistant ideas. So I don't doubt that there is a personal component to it, but there must be something transpersonal in some way, shape, or form.

    I think that Carl Jung would have argued that some of these themes are common to us because of some inherent wiring in our brain (he writes at length about commonalities in the a priori self). My own perspective is that this limited perspective that Jung provides, while more defensible, strikes me as incomplete.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  96. Re:Can I get partial credit? by g4c · · Score: 1

    You know, I would consider it far worse if a person who believes that you will go to hell if you don't believe _doesn't_ approach you about converting. It would be like standing by and watching people jump off a cliff without saying anything. That would be inexcusable. Next time somebody tries to convert you, thank them kindly at the very least.

  97. British Telecom Labs are Haunted by David+Off · · Score: 1

    British Telecom Labs at Martlesham Heath are Haunted, well maybe. One of the engineers doing an all nighter reported seeing a group of airmen walking down the corridor, apart from the fact that airmen were a pretty rare occurence in the labs the thing that most freaked him out was that their legs dissapeared into the ground from the mid-thigh down.

    We did some research. Martlesham Heath was a former WWII airbase. The building where the ghostly apparition was seen was the site aircrew mess - only, and here is the rub, the current building's floor level was 1 meter higher than the old building so the ghosts were still walking around on the old floor level.

    Needless to say I never did overtime and my boss never asked.

  98. Re:DICK UP YOUR ASS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee it would be cool if you were a Microsoft-paid Astroturfer.

  99. Haunted office? by Tug3 · · Score: 1

    Why not, at least it would explain a lot what's been happening in our company:
    The whole sales department is acting like a bunch of zombies. All the coders are propably direct descendants of Count Drakul - at least they react to UV-light similarly. The customer support group must be all ghosts, as we all know they must exist (as we've heard them), but nobody's ever seen them - or been able to take a photo of them. And we do hear Strange Noises from The Office Upstairs during late (last)night rush to catch up before next mornings deadline...
    ...come to think of it, even the word deadline starts to make sense now...

    --
    If all else fails, pull the plug and get out...
    The Life is out there...
  100. Re:Can I get partial credit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I would consider it far worse if a person who believes that you will go to hell if you don't believe _doesn't_ approach you about converting. It would be like standing by and watching people jump off a cliff without saying anything. That would be inexcusable. Next time somebody tries to convert you, thank them kindly at the very least.

    Ah, but what happens to those people who are *never* approached about converting and have never heard of the religion in quesiton or had the option of converting? The answer I often get from reglious types is that those people will not go to hell, because they weren't aware of the option to convert. Now, here's the kicker. If I were such an unaware person, I'd not be going to hell. But, by approaching me about converting, you may have now doomed me to hell. You don't get a thank you for that! You just committed me to hell, mother fucker!

  101. Re:There are no ghosts by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I have this argument with my friends quite often.

    Friend: "I don't really believe in God so I'm not really religious"
    Me: "You do essentially believe in the same thing though don't you so you may as well be religious"
    "No, I just think there's something else out there and I mean when we die where does all the energy go - there must be something"
    "It would be nice if there was 'something' after death but you have to admit it's just wishful thinking on your part and you may as well substitute God for 'something' just there."
    "No man, it's no 'God', just something - you know energy can't be destroyed so where does it go ? It must go somewhere, perhaps change into something else"
    "Your energy goes to feed the worms and nourish the soil, that's it. Admit you are religious"
    "No, Im not I just believe in, you know something else when you die. It can't all just end"
    "That's how religions start, admit - go on. Your are religious aren't you. Go on, say it, say it"
    "No, I'm not man. You just don't get it."

    ETC, normally they end up getting quite annoyed.

  102. Re:There are no ghosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now thats absolute crap...I know several people who aren't religious but still believe that there is residual energy left from a person.

    You're correct. Instead of "religious simpleton," he should have written "fucking moron."

  103. New Windows ad: by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

    MS Windows -- forget about the ghosts!

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  104. My office has a ghost... by Faw · · Score: 1

    I call it "The Restore Ghost". It restores old bugs I know i fixed. When I check the source code I know exactly where the problem is because I already fixed it. No, is not Deja-Vu, I clearly remember I fixed it.

  105. Strangely... by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    In all my own years haunting cubicles in this life, I have never met anyone haunting them in the next. I guess only people with souls can become ghosts.

  106. My Experience by bLanark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This didn't happen in my day job office, but a "place of work" of another kind. My wife was chair of a local charity, which is a toy library - it lends toys instead of books. They had wangled a total refurb of their premises from a local firm, who do a project for charity each year. This year, it was our turn, and all we had to do was to clear out all the toys and old shelves to give these guys space to build and paint.

    The library has three interconnecting rooms in a shared-use building, all charities. The old shelves were metal, and I went down one night to dismantle them. Just before I left, my wife told me that the place used to be a funeral parlour. Sure enough, one room had metal-lined walls, and there were two enormous metal-lined doors lying in a back corridor.

    It was November, the raid was dripping all around, and the heating system was making very strange noises. Very spooky. The shelves were held together by square bolts, so I had to use an adjustable spanner. I soon got into the groove, and had an efficient system for dismantling the shelves. I'd work with the shelves upside down, and the metal shelves would form a tray that I'd keep my tools in.

    So, it's night, spooky noises, dull lighting, no music, and my thoughts turn to the fact this used to be a funeral parlour. Then, I get a big suprise: the spanner, which was set to the correct size for the square nuts, was fully open - about 25 mm instead of 10.

    Lots of silly thoughts went through my mind, especially curious ghosts examining my tools. I checked where my car keys were, mentally planned my exit route, and, a little spooked, I carried on working.

    All was fine for about five minutes, until the spanner didn't fit again - and this time, it was fully closed! I was so, so close to legging it, but I told myself that there was no such thing as ghosts, that any tortured spirits would haunt their homes and not the funeral parlour they lay for a few days. So, I stuck it out, although I was very "observant" from then on.

    An accident as I packed up provided an explanation. I stepped over a toolbox, and landed on the adjustable spanner. It slid forward and the little adjusting wheel moved - closing the spanner jaws. When I'd been working on the shelves, sometimes my spanner would slide along the shelf, and it must have closed on one occassion, and opened on the other one.

    I'm so glad that I didn't run out of there in fear, especially after the spanner moved for the second time. I kept telling myself that there is always a logical explanation for all events, and it turned out that there was!

    --
    Note to ACs: I won't mod you up, even if you are being funny or insightful. So take a chance! It's not real life!
  107. What a turkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they have a million already, and more coming in. I'd say that suits them just fine. Why would they lose that on the gamble they might make more? Or are you a psychic now? Showing off your fortune telling abilities? I'd say they are ultra conservatives which means they don't like risks. Oh and by the way, with the process you keep prattling on about like a stuck record, where is their ISO number? What, no recognised quality standards? What a shock.

    And its forty, you illiterate moron.

    What a turkey.

    1. Re:What a turkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about. It was a hypothetical scenario that suggests how the randi foundation might capitalize on finding such a psychic. With a bit of a joke thrown in for good measure. Go masturbate some more or something.

  108. Mod parent down please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is your mom a psychic or something?

    gp is quoting aristotle, parent is throwing "your mom" jokes around. if this ain't trolling i dunno what is.

    1. Re:Mod parent down please by ankarbass · · Score: 1

      "gp is quoting aristotle, parent is throwing "your mom" jokes around. if this ain't trolling i dunno what is."

      Haha, nice try darkman. It's too late, you can't reverse the karma.

      BTW: Have you ever read Arthur Schopenhauer's Art of Controversy? I believe quoting aristotle is one of the techniques. Well, it's pretty damn close.

      At any rate, as the mods have repeatedly demonstrated to you, quoting aristotle in the middle of a temper tantrum does not make you clever.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
  109. Re:DICK UP YOUR ASS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod this down as flamebait

  110. haunted offices by whitecougar · · Score: 1

    Well for me as a person that works with shamanism this subject is very real. I have been places where the energy is so bad that people dont get to do any work. After ive been there the energy and productivity has changes. Offcourse this might be just coincidence or placebo?

    1. Re:haunted offices by daikokatana · · Score: 1
      Coincidence or placebo? How about fraud!

      If there are places out there where they buy that sort of crap, productivity should be the last thing on their minds!

      --
      http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
    2. Re:haunted offices by whitecougar · · Score: 1

      Youre entitled do your opinion. But I dont charge for my services so how is that fraud?

  111. Re:To those who doubt the paranormal by budgenator · · Score: 1

    There have been several occasions when I was working alone late at night in the office, that I'd heard and saw out of the corner of my eye someone moving, that was so real seeming that I had to search the whole office just to make sure someone hadn't broken in. Now I'm used to creepy sounds at night, that big flat roof absorbs a lot of heat during a day, and as it slowly cools at night, it gives off a lot spooky sounds; but every once in a while something genuinaly spooky happens to give me a delicious adrenaline rush. The ingrate never seems willing to any any work woth or for me in exchange for an occasional scare.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  112. Ghost in the Cat by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1
    They're made of that thin aluminum?

    In all seriousness, don't consider bending it slowly with your bare hands with the intent to bend it a perfect 90 degree angle in any way comparable to slamming into it at high speed. Notice how the primary bend is right up on the string. Have you ever stood in the way of a cat on full rampage and had it plow into you? Those things can pick up serious momentum. And if that's a part of your bed at just the right height for a curious cat to stand on and try to look out the window, I would not look any further. I have had cat damage to blinds look virtually identical to this.

  113. spirits by unk1911 · · Score: 1

    the only spirits in this here home office are stowed away in the fridge: captn' morgan and jack daniels and the spirit of the good old grey goose

    --
    http://unk1911.blogspot.com/

  114. Absolute negative statements are.... difficult by anomaly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you say "There's no such thing as the supernatural," on what basis do you make that statment?

    How can you prove that they don't exist?

    Are you saying that non-material things are non-material, or that the non-material does not exist?

    What about duty, honor, love? Do they exist? Are they natural?

    Slashdot is a poor place to make an absolute negative assertion.

    Respectfully,
    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
    1. Re:Absolute negative statements are.... difficult by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

      Anything that exists is as natural as anything else. That's what I'm saying. Maybe you just didn't care to read my post. Also, if ghosts exist, they too would be "natural", just like everything else! How is it even possible that this is somehow difficult to grasp?

  115. obligitory bendor quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bendor: Even though the computer was off and unplugged, there on the monitor was the windows logo.
    Fry: That's not scary.
    Bendor: It is if your a lasor printer.

    1. Re:obligitory bendor quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bendor: Even though the computer was off and unplugged, there on the monitor was the windows logo.
      Fry: That's not scary.
      Bendor: It is if your a lasor printer.

      Try "Bender" (remember, he bends things), and "laser" instead. How come you didn't spell them "computor" and "printor"?

  116. Buildings breath by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    Some of the door 'slamming' or closed doors being 'thumped' happens because buildings breath. It's somewhat like blowing across a bottle to make a tone, but ultra low frequency. It's more like bottles connected to bottles. You could probably work something out with a fluid dynamics simulation. The wind doesn't need to be that high to get an effect, but most newer or 'renovated' buildings are too noisy to hear the smaller movements, though. (I measured a lot of 'quiet' rooms in the US at 25 decibels) Caves with a single entrance breath, too, and the frequency can be used to determine the volume.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  117. Re:Can I get partial credit? by g4c · · Score: 1

    I would say that simply because a person is not given the option of converting doesn't necessarily mean that they will automatically be saved. I don't think they are ruled out, but I think God weighs the person's heart. He knows if that person, when confronted with the gospel, would accept or reject it. That's my theory anyway, but I can't say I completely know the mind of God. All I know is that He is just and merciful. Thus, if somebody can be saved, they will be saved. If they reject God, they won't be saved. Anybody who truly seeks God with an open heart will find Him; He will reveal Himself. If a person puts restrictions on Him and says, "I won't believe in a god who _________," then they set themselves and their own understanding as god, rather than allowing for the possibility that God is not something that can be understood completeley by the human mind.

  118. natural? by anomaly · · Score: 1

    How do you define natural?

    I obviously read what you wrote, because I quoted it. I think you may fail to have understood the depth of my questions. Did you read and think about what I wrote?

    Respectfully,
    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?