Slashdot Mirror


Novell to Release 20% of Their Employees?

sicariusdracus writes to tell us that Ron Hovsepian, the new president and COO of Novell may have his hands full in the near future. Ron has been tasked with getting the troubled business back on track which many have speculated could result in more than 20% of the 5,800 man workforce getting a pink slip (although Hovsepian suggests that may be an over exaggeration). Part of the restructuring will be announced with Novell's fourth-quarter financial results.

206 comments

  1. Act I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Smithers: Mr. Hovsepian there's some solicitors at your door to see you.
    Hovsepian: Release the employees.

    1. Re:Act I by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      +1 for parent

      From the article: "The layoffs will be more about resource allocation,"

      Enough with this PC stuff. Why can't they just say, something like, "We don't have the budget to sustain 5800 salarys, so we're laying off X people."? There is something to be said for Candor from executives.

      --
      No Sigs!
    2. Re:Act I by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

      They're not people. They're resources.

    3. Re:Act I by boxfetish · · Score: 1

      They're not resources. They're expenses.

    4. Re:Act I by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      They're not expenses. They're frivolous wastes of company wealth, and it is the demand of we stockholders that they be REPLACED with robots that never require such compensation!

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    5. Re:Act I by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      Hmm, what's better...being refered to as a resource or a headcount?

      --
      No Sigs!
    6. Re:Act I by boxfetish · · Score: 1

      Corporations should be democratically organized. They should be developed and viewed much differently. First, it should be acknowledged that corporations are (semi-)public entities with obligations for the public good and subject to control by both the community and their employees. A body of distant, amorphous "owners" should not be able to disenfranchise a stable, human community of workers, i.e., the employees. The aims of the corporation should reflect the primacy of employees. Payouts to stockholders should be viewed as COSTS to be contained, with the REWARDS of productivity improvements accruing to employees.

  2. fly my prettys, fly by hector_uk · · Score: 3, Funny

    i just got a mental picture of evil novel monkeys with wings being released......

  3. WHAT ABOUT MIGUEL AND NAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about MIGUEL and NAT? Are they going to have to get real JOBs soon?

    Who cares about the rest of the people anyways. MIGUEL and NAT are the only two main Novell engineers.

    1. Re:WHAT ABOUT MIGUEL AND NAT by geomon · · Score: 1, Funny

      MIGUEL and NAT are the only two main Novell engineers.

      Just ask them! They'll tell you.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    2. Re:WHAT ABOUT MIGUEL AND NAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Head of HR@novell: 'Mr.De Icaza, Mr.Friedman, please step into my office'

      Nat and Miguel: 'You can call us Nat and Miguel'

      Head of HR@novell: 'Please Mr.De Icaza and Mr.Friedman step into my office and take a seat' ...

  4. Stocks? by Gr33nNight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So after the 4th quarter results are in, that would be a good time to buy Novell stocks? $7/share is pretty tempting...

    1. Re:Stocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It sells at 53 times next years earnings. That is more expensive than google. I can't think of any correct way to say that novl is cheap.

    2. Re:Stocks? by tonyr60 · · Score: 4, Funny

      SGI's are even cheaper....

    3. Re:Stocks? by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Informative

      Err actually, the stock has been downgraded by several investment firms. Its expected drop a bit further even with the restructure. This will be like the 7th restructuring Novell has done in a little over a decade, if this doesn't pan out I don't think anyone will want their stock.
      Regards,
      Steve

    4. Re:Stocks? by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      Never listen to the investment firms. Their buy/sell/hold statements are based on what the firm holds not what is good for the investor.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  5. Release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It makes it sound like they're in prison!

    1. Re:Release? by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Naw, that's Electronic Arts.

    2. Re:Release? by faragon · · Score: 1

      Yes, "release", welcome to the 21th century and the Euphemism Revival (tm).

  6. released by specialkp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I sure hope they're released under the GPL... It's good to see companies like this releasing human resources though. I'm going to download some today! Anyone got a torrent?

    1. Re:released by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I know, "released"? What the hell? Is that the euphanism we're using now? I forget which edition of newspeak we are on.

      "Released" sounds pleasant. "What did you do today, honey?", "I got released from work!!", "Wonderful, let's celebrate!".

      Meanwhile, those of us in the real world use words like "fired", "laid-off", "redundant". I can see why their market research indicated a change was required. It's like rebranding "cancer" as "closure".

  7. 600 people to be laid off by Marcus+Meissner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pretty old news, it will be around 10% or 600 jobs
    Ciao, Marcus

    1. Re:600 people to be laid off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're quoting an older news article that reports completely different details?
      Did it ever occur to you that two different happenings at two different times could possibly be two different events?

    2. Re:600 people to be laid off by mypalmike · · Score: 1, Informative

      I guess 43 minutes is pretty old!

      by Marcus Meissner (6627) on Wednesday November 02, @06:06PM (#13936548)
      Pretty old news, it will be around 10% or 600 jobs


      From TFA:
      AP
      Novell to Cut Jobs in Restructuring Plan
      Wednesday November 2, 5:23 pm ET
      Novell to Eliminate 600 Jobs As Part of Restructuring Plan, Expects Fourth-Quarter Charge

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  8. release... oh good, finally released... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait a minute, are you saying we're FIRED?

    I have such a hard time with this Newspeak.

    1. Re:release... oh good, finally released... by idlake · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actuall, we programmers try to think of it as "allocation", "freeing", and "releasing". So, no, they haven't been "fired", they have been "freed".

    2. Re:release... oh good, finally released... by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny

      I suppose it beats working at Sun and getting "garbage collected"...

    3. Re:release... oh good, finally released... by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've always thought that when I own a business, I'm going to have a plank out the second floor window into a dumpster for firing people. I'd use a sword and have pirate music and everything.

      That, and an extremely good legal team.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:release... oh good, finally released... by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

      It was actually known as being RIFed at Sun, which is short for 'Reduction in Force'.

      I should know, I'm a RIFee. I volunteered for a RIFing and I promptly got RIFed by a RIFer!

      I love these euphamisms.

  9. Mono by Tanaka · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lets just hope this has no effect on Mono. I'm amazed how far thay have come with the project. There are so meny sin-off projects now, it has to be taken seriously.

    1. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Let's hope it does have an effect on Mono. I'm seriously amazed at how stupid some people could be adopting Microsoft's technology instead of leveraging other open source technologies. I hope they fire all the Mono developers. Miguel could then go try and get a job at his favorite company, Microsoft.

    2. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not AGREE more. I think the ECMA pieces of .NET are just bait for fool-hardy, arrogant, and even pompous developers that think that their efforts alone can change the business model of a 60 Billion Dollar behemoth.

    3. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh hello! You two must be KDE users! What's it like to use a dying DE?

    4. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micro$oft isn't even eating their own dog food. The common runtime was one of the center pieces of Longhorn. That went in the toilet and they have switched back to their old NT code base for Window Fista...oops! I mean Windows Vista.

      If you want an open common platform go with something more mature and truly x-platform...Java! Sure it aint perfect, but at least major business logic has been, and is currently, running on it. And it runs on Windows, Linux, Unix, OS X, etc., etc.

    5. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they fire all the Mono developers because Mono is already dead and they're just prolonging the burial. On Windows people aren't going to use Mono as they will use Microsoft's runtime as its better in almost every possible way and it doesn't have loads of compatibility and performance problems. On Linux much of the user base won't even install Mono... So tell me where is Mono going to fit in? I highly doubt the very small number of Linux users that use Mono is going to make any difference. For example, at my work we would like to try Beagle on a few desktops however it requires the Mono runtime so it therefore is not an option.

      I also know a ton of Microsoft supporters that look at Linux and laugh as it looks like Linux is just constantly trying to copy and catch up to Microsoft's technology. No matter how hard the Mono idiots try, it will never catch up to Microsoft's runtime and it will always look like Linux is just playing catch up...

    6. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > old NT code base for Window Fista...oops! I mean Windows Vista.

      Is anyone impressed with this pun? Seriously, that's just lame. Stop with the "M$", "Winblows", "RedShat" etc. Nobody is moved or informed. Nobody thinks it's clever. Your nerd slang doesn't prove anything other than your own lack of creativity.

    7. Re:Mono by idlake · · Score: 1

      I'm seriously amazed at how stupid some people could be adopting Microsoft's technology instead of leveraging other open source technologies.

      The combination of ECMA C# and Gtk# is 100% open source technologies, and that is what open source applications are built on.

      You don't have to worry about the Microsoft aspects of C#--those are part of Novell's business plan. I'm sure their lawyers have done their homework and weighed the risks. But even if they got it wrong, it has no influence on the open source parts of Mono.

    8. Re:Mono by idlake · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify: the Mono .NET implementation is, of course, also open source. But it's an open source implementation of proprietary APIs.

      By "the open source parts of Mono", I was referring to open source implementations of open and free APIs: ECMA C# and Gtk+.

    9. Re:Mono by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      On Linux much of the user base won't even install Mono...
      I'll bite. Why on earth not? Especially if they already know they'd like to use Beagle. I am truly baffled.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    10. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, they must be KDE users because all the other DE's use Mono so heavily..... Idiot, none of the DE's use Mono at all for anything in the base packages. In fact the only useful program written in Mono is Beagle and I think we can all live without that bloat. Only an idiot would program anything in Mono and frankly if any DE decides to incorporate Mono I'm sure many of us will switch DE's that day.

    11. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mono's use of Microsoft's APIs has been examined more carefully than any other open source project in history.

      I suggest you put up or shut up, rather than badmouthing one of the most important open source projects in existence. Go produce a truly open, working environment similar to Mono based on APIs that you consider "open". Oh, one thing: you can forget about starting with Java, because the Java APIs really are proprietary and a legal tarpit.

    12. Re:Mono by Tanaka · · Score: 1

      I'm blown away with Mono. I had to write a C# console app for Windoze, and I am so glad I did, because it's my favourite language now. I took the .exe compiled in Visual Studio, and ran it on my Linux box without modification. Not only did it run without any complaint, but it was able to handle more data throughput! C# is such a nice language to write in. I like Java, but C# just feels more accomplished.

    13. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got to say, I rather like C# too, especially with the V2.0 enhancements. Mono does look cool. It certainly seems to have come a long way since I last looked at it. As soon as they get Windows Forms complete (early next year?), then I have a number of applications ready to port across.

    14. Re:Mono by Tanaka · · Score: 1

      As soon as they get Windows Forms complete


      You can always use the gtk# bindings, which will also work on Windows. You will have to use Glade to design your forms. MonoDevelop doesn't yet have a form designer, and SharpDevlop doesn't have gtk support yet. The latter is a very good IDE btw.
    15. Re:Mono by hey! · · Score: 1

      **sigh**

      I admire the mono project, I really do.

      But I still worry about the possiblity of some of the technology being covered, either under a submarine patent (although I suppose at this late date this is extremely unlikely), or under a published patent where the applicability to the C# technology is not obvious to anybody but some devious Microsoft strategist. It may border on the paranoid now, but I can't help it. I know Microsoft is a brutal competitor, and I don't think they're beyond doing such a thing if they can get away with it.

      Of course, such patents could apply to any projects; you can't disprove the nonexistence of a thing. But a project like Mono would be particularly vulnerable.

      I think there should be a law that no patent can be enforced against users of a standard, if the patent holder proposed adding infringing features to that standard without (a) making it clear their proposal includes patented technology and (b) announcing their intention to charge license fees for their technology. In that case, I'd be wholeheartedly behind mono.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mono's use of Microsoft's APIs has been examined more carefully than any other open source project in history."

      Yes, they've been examined very carefully by people who desperately want Mono to be accepted. Not really a great representation of a "fair and legit" examination of the legal issues.

      "I suggest you put up or shut up, rather than badmouthing one of the most important open source projects in existence."

      hahahahaha. Way to pat yourself on the back idiot. Mono is nowhere near being one of the most important open source projects in existence. Practically no one uses Mono and there are thousands, if not millions, of open source projects that are more important and used much more extensively.

      "Oh, one thing: you can forget about starting with Java, because the Java APIs really are proprietary and a legal tarpit."

      Actually the Java APIs are completely open source. It's the Sun runtime/compiler that has parts that are only available in binary form. However, you're completely free to make your own runtime as many other companies have. Go ahead use Mono if you want, but it's a known fact that most people will not install Mono to use your application or any other. In most corporate settings Mono is not even an option. I don't mind use Mono, it just means that you won't be competitive and that you will always be a non-factor.

      Anyways, I'd rather have the Java Community Process controlling the main implementation of Java because I'm not interested in seeing the compatibility mess that's so common in the open source community.

    17. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing stopping me from using SharpDevelop at the moment, is the lack of a proper debugger. I understand the next release addresses this. It will be interesting to see if Mono's Windows-Forms allows you to run SharpDevelop on Linux, and where that will leave MonoDevelop which appears somewhat behind right now.

    18. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite what the zealots say, Mono is very impressive project. I would encourage anyone looking for a modern programming environment to look into it. They even have it working on a Nokia 770 now. See the last screenshot here http://www.mono-project.com/Screenshots

      I like C# better than Java, but thats just a matter of choice. Java can be run on the Mono platform. They even have Eclipse working on it. How they got so far with this project in so little time, is astonishing. As the original poster said, there are a lot of side projects on the go, pushing the boundaries even further.

      I couldn't care less, if Mono is based on a Microsoft project. Mono can stand up on it's own now, and in time, will surpass .Net in many areas, as they already have done with cross-platform, and non-MS bindings.

    19. Re:Mono by idlake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think there should be a law that no patent can be enforced against users of a standard, if the patent holder proposed adding infringing features to that standard without (a) making it clear their proposal includes patented technology and (b) announcing their intention to charge license fees for their technology. In that case, I'd be wholeheartedly behind mono.

      That's what standards bodies like ECMA and ISO are for--they require specific procedures and disclosures when it comes to patents. Microsoft went through this, so we know they are committed to being compliant with ECMA and ISO regulations when it comes to patents and intellectual property. Sun chickened out when faced with this--they withdrew their standards body submissions over ECMA, ANSI, and ISO's requirements for disclosure and openness.

      But I still worry about the possiblity of some of the technology being covered, either under a submarine patent (although I suppose at this late date this is extremely unlikely), or under a published patent where the applicability to the C# technology is not obvious to anybody but some devious Microsoft strategist. It may border on the paranoid now, but I can't help it. I know Microsoft is a brutal competitor, and I don't think they're beyond doing such a thing if they can get away with it.

      The fact that there is a connection between Mono and Microsoft, however slight, doesn't make me happy either. But, in the end, what's the worst that's going to happen?

      First of all, Microsoft can't claim willful infringement if people don't know about the patent, so there wouldn't be any penalties. And what damages are they going to claim? And damages are usually based on revenue, but who derives revenue from shipping Mono commercially?

      If Microsoft were to assert a patent claim, people would work around it within a few weeks and the matter would be closed; it is implausible that any judge would even waste time looking at the matter after that.

      Also, FOSS must be violating lots of Microsoft patents, at least on paper: the Linux kernel, Apache, Mozilla, etc. From a purely practical point of view, Microsoft must have done the calculation and decided that it simply isn't worth doing anything about it. .NET is an unlikely place for them to start sueing. If they wanted to hurt FOSS, they'd go after the Linux kernel or Apache.

      There are several so-called FOSS supporters that have licenses and intellectual property that constitutes a much bigger risk to the FOSS community than anything Microsoft has. Microsoft and Mono just isn't high on my list of worries.

    20. Re:Mono by hey! · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your well thought out response.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    21. Re:Mono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mono looks like a total waste of money for Novell so I'd expect most redundancies to be in the Mono development

  10. Re:"Over exaggeration"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or like "really OK."

  11. over exaggerators! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man, i hate those over exaggerations. as if exaggerations weren't bad enough already!

    1. Re:over exaggerators! by AgentPhunk · · Score: 1

      I've told you a million times - DON'T EXAGGERATE!

  12. help me out here... by CDPatten · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All joking aside, who uses them anymore? Is their business all legacy support?

    Do any of you guys use them? I guess I ask because I'm surprised they are still in business.

    I hanve't seen a novell system in many years, and never hear about copanies doing a big novell roll-out.

    1. Re:help me out here... by CoolCash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Our company does, we have 23 severs running Netware and GroupWise, in our company. They are great file and print servers with great directory services. We only have three employees managing all the servers and all helpdesk calls for 350 people.

    2. Re:help me out here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You don't see them because they are the servers in the the room that just keep working. :-)

      Honestly, we have quite a few Netware servers for file/print. They just run and run great.

      We are migrating away from them over time, but only because of support and marketshare. Too bad really.

      Not quite Banyan Vines, but oh well.

      It will be interesting to see if Netware services on top of Linux (OES) will allow Novell to keep their base happy. We're playing with it now.

      We had some of our Netware 4 Servers run for over a year before they were rebooted, and that was for a move. We bounce our 5 and now 6 servers a bit more frequently, but that's for patch reasons, and it's almost always months between reboots.

      TTYL

    3. Re:help me out here... by deanoaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are still big among enterprises that value reliability and ease of use for large directories. I work in local goverment and it is our central store of identity and authentication for 12,000 users, as well as distributing applications and hosting files. Netware 6.5 provides great resources for Identity Management. Many goverment and educational sites use Netware, maybe because they typically don't have a lot of money for staff and need something that isn't labor intensive or prone to failure.

      We have never had server downtime because of a virus or worm.

      Novell's marketing seems to be the only weakness, the products are great.

      Their hope of the future is migrating all their existing features to run over Linux.

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
    4. Re:help me out here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Installed a 200-user system last week, actually. Or maybe SLES does not count?

    5. Re:help me out here... by gnuLNX · · Score: 1

      "We only have three employees managing all the servers and all helpdesk calls for 350 people."

      Lucky F**&'ers. We have 3 for 900 or so.

      --
      what?
    6. Re:help me out here... by Cerberus7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We do. I don't remember what our employee count is, exactly, but it's quite a bit over 15,000. As others have said, great for file, print, email, and directory services. Novell's eDirectory (formerly NDS) is the most mature, stable, and powerful directory service package out there. Their clustering and SAN solutions are also quite excellent. Novell's Linux products aren't ready for prime time, yet, but they're coming along. By the time Netware 7 is out (_all_ Suse under the hood), the Novell Linux Desktop should be mature enough for real use. Then I can ditch my Win2K box for work tasks. *yay!*

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    7. Re:help me out here... by Bulmakau · · Score: 1

      I don't really know who uses Novell anymore.
      last time I saw Novell was about 14 years ago when I managed a computer center in a community center. Even then though I was wondering why they decided to use Novell (network).
      I assume it is legacy as you suggest. However, I don't really know (although by itself that can be an indicative). However, legacy business can still be a good business.

      --
      "From the moment I could talk, I was ordered to listen" - Cat Stevens
    8. Re:help me out here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have 100k users using 170 novell servers running netware 6.0 sp5. Been using novell for almost 10 years now.
      Works great. Has some problems (all systems do) but works well for us in our environ.

    9. Re:help me out here... by Searaven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think you'd be surprised who uses Netware and it's services. I work for IDC, International Data Corporation. We use Netware and Suse in most of the 47 countries we have offices in. I used to work in the corporate headquarters in the US where we have Netware 5.x and 6.x file/print/services servers in all the offices. They mostly run for over a year or more between reboots. Those are usually for service packs and rarely for abends. Netware/eDirectory is very low on the scale of adminstrative burden and it allows us to manage the network and desktops for 750+ users in 7 offices across the States with only 2 full time desktop support staff and 2 admins who also take care of many other systems. Most of our sites with 10 to 50 people don't have a local admin and run quite happily. Novell's ZenWorks is phenomenal for remote application delivery, imaging, remote control and inventory for the desktop. I moved to Australia in May to bring IDC AP over to Novell services, running on the Linux kernel with OES. It's a slow process getting the entire region ready for the change. So far I have our New Zealand office migrated and the Sydney office is very soon to follow and some of our services in Australia are already on Netware. Since I got here I've had to manage two Windows domains and though I started with NT domains many years ago I feel like I've got an arm tied behind my back administering the Windows networks, services and users. Things that are so painless with Netware are either difficult or not possible with NT domains. I've been so spoiled with Netware I can't wait to be rid of the domains! Active Directory is better than NT, but from what I've seen (it's in a few of our offices over here), it's not nearly as fully featured as the far more mature Novell eDirectory product. Our current Netware sites will gradually migrates to Open Enterprise Server runnin on the SLES Linux kernel and many of our core services are running on Linux. If it wasn't for vendors who only roll out applications only for Windows machines - Patchlink, ePo, etc, we wouldn't have any Windows servers. I agree with an earlier post that Novell's marketing efforts have always been their downfall. It's too bad really, because it is such a superior product to choice of the huddled masses.

    10. Re:help me out here... by zap_branigan · · Score: 1

      I can never understand why people think no one uses Novell anymore. We use Novell for everything for our 80,000 students. You cannot beat Netware for file/print. We use a combination of Groupwise and Netmail. Of course all identities are kept in eDirectory---the most solid, robust directory out there. Identity Manager is used to sync all systems.

      You can pretty much count on all education and government being Novell or very heavily entrenched in it. If you think no one uses Novell, you are seriously out of the loop or too narrow focused.

    11. Re:help me out here... by bonius_rex · · Score: 1
      Do any of you guys use them? I guess I ask because I'm surprised they are still in business.

      Hells yes. I have about 40 Netware 6.5 servers, 2500 users in eDirectory, and about the same number of workstations managed by Zenworks Desktop Management.

    12. Re:help me out here... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      My university uses Novel for the non-engineering and non-compsci portion of the student body user accounts. Not sure why, except htat perhaps it is easier/cheaper to use Novel with them, since they don't need access to the suite of tools that the engr/csci people do (Pro-E, Matlab, Mathcad, all that kinda jazz)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    13. Re:help me out here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm working for a consulting company in Quebec, Canada We deserve lots of public and private entities, who all uses Novell products At all, I would say that all those companies purchase annually over 10000 and maby 20000 users license from Novell Netware 6.0 & 6.5, Groupwise, ZENworks, BorderManager, IDM2, etc.etc.etc

    14. Re:help me out here... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Our company does, we have 23 severs running Netware and GroupWise, in our company. They are great file and print servers with great directory services. We only have three employees managing all the servers and all helpdesk calls for 350 people.

      Yeah, ok that sounds cool, but what about TCO?

      That's Trepidation and Craven Obeisance.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:help me out here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have done a migration from a Windows to Novell network at my company.

      It has been wonderful. The servers are running SuSE Linux w/ Novell services & groupwise. I have seen virus attacks go to 0, security is better, the system is more responsive, easier to integrate with (eDirectory handles authentication for every in-house application we have, took about 15 minutes to code), and *much* more reliable.

      My experience has been that Novell software is just incredibly capable. It. Just. Works. Even in the face of configuration problems, it all just keeps trucking along.

      I could do a lot of what is available through Novell using openLdap, samba, cyrus, and so on. But I am one person supporting a staff of 150 AND writing custom software. Novell + Linux lets me do this and keep the system administrator job down to about 5 hours per month not including supporting these damned windows workstations.

    16. Re:help me out here... by carldub · · Score: 1

      A lot of school district use Novell. They like ZEN works. Most use Novell networking with Windows however.

    17. Re:help me out here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought we had it bad to have 4 engineers for 250 windows servers.

      We are also a big novell shop. Part of their problem I always see is that we are one of their biggest customers, only we aren't very big...

      The government gives them piles of money every year. Security through obscurity is Novell's old selling point. Of course it won't be with Suse...

    18. Re:help me out here... by smyle · · Score: 1
      Novell's marketing seems to be the only weakness, the products are great.

      As a consultant dealing with several NetWare LANs, I've gotta ask what you're smoking, and why aren't you sharing?

      Do me a favor, tell me the checkboxes I can click to install NW6.5 to get a fully running, usable server installed without twiddling any text files. File sharing is easy enough, but I want iPrint, iFolder, NetStorage, and Virtual Office (and no, installing on SYS: doesn't make it usable). I'd even settle for a nice GUI to change them after unreasonable defaults.

      As much as I hate to say it (and as a long-time fan of Novell, I really do!), but Windows servers have been much more stable than Novell for the past couple of years.

      At least they haven't managed to kill SuSE yet.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  13. take the money and run by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

    Will Ron Hovsepian be different than many other high powered COO's in the long run? What if he fails to resurect Novell, he will be paid either handsomely as a saviour or bid adieu with a seperation package. Either way he will be far better than the pink slip recipients. It's never about the little guy when stockholders are involved. Even when those laid off deserved to be.

    1. Re:take the money and run by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Either way he will be far better than the pink slip recipients.

      I dunno about that... Not being forced to use Groupwise anymore may put you in the "far better off" category.

      (Please not in the face! I do tech support for Groupwise!)

      But seriously...

      What if he fails to resurect Novell, he will be paid either handsomely as a saviour or bid adieu with a seperation package. Either way he will be far better than the pink slip recipients.

      I think Scott Adams (Dilbert Author) had pretty good words about layoffs... (I'm paraphrasing this!) 'When they intention to make the company "lean and mean" goes wrong, it makes them "Skinny and Pissed" instead.'

      CEO's think layoffs are the best way to save the company because employees are the costliest part of the company, but often those people were actually doing something (most of the time).

      Think of the anology of you cutting off your fingers to keep from going hungry.

      Sure it works, but over time you start running out of body parts to munch on.

      Long term successful companies don't lay off employees, they find more revenue streams along with better business models and expand the business.

      If you find yourself having to lay off employees, then you have to actually consider how you reached this point. Did you just hire too many people or are you failing as a company to make money? If you can't answer that question then the company is going into a death spiral and you best start looking for an exist strategy...

      As for that, I suggest riding stock options by deceiving shareholders that you are actually making a profit by selling of parts of the company, firing more workers, blaming the previous CEO, suing other companies for IP infringment, and fancy powerpoint presentations.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  14. Release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FREEEEEEEEDOM!

  15. Released... by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets just say they've been "open sourced". 1160 people liberated, people want to be free.

    But not me, I'm expensive.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  16. Yesterday... by Otter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In the Boston Globe yesterday: "Novell trips over its Linux strategy".

    I'd had a feeling that that story wasn't going to get posted here...

    1. Re:Yesterday... by geomon · · Score: 2

      Why? Are you implying that a Linux-based article that has a potential negative spin to it will never see the light of day on Slashdot?

      Cripes, man! Where were you (a 4 digit UID man, at that) during the endless SCO discussions?

      I'm sure if you searh through everyones submission box it was probably one of the thousands of perfectly good articles that got passed over.

      All is not lost, however. You got it in, didn't you?

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    2. Re:Yesterday... by Darth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dont see why this story wouldn't get posted.

      Everyone, including the financial backers, approve of the purchase of SuSE and agree with the strategy Novell is trying to implement. The problem is that they dont have faith in the executive management team to implement the plan successfully. They arent looking to scrap the company's migration to linux. They're looking at whether they should get a new management team to finish implementing the plan, or give the current management more time.

      The article even includes a Linux success story at the end where a chain of fitness stores abandoned the patch-and-pray cycle of Windows in favour of a Netware on SuSE linux solution. Their I.T. manager says the move has saved them over $400k.

      Even if you believe there's a conspiracy to keep articles that are negative toward linux off of Slashdot, this certainly wouldn't qualify as one.

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    3. Re:Yesterday... by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      I'm no Linux apologist, but I don't think TFA makes any point about Linux. The only cited failure is a client moving from Novell to Red Hat. Now if said client moved to M$...

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
    4. Re:Yesterday... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      Why? Did you expect that we'd not want to admit that you can't make money by selling Free Software? You can't. It's not a profit center. If you want to understand how its economics work. Look here.

      Bruce

    5. Re:Yesterday... by Otter · · Score: 1
      Did you expect that we'd not want to admit that you can't make money by selling Free Software? You can't.

      Excuse me ... WHAT?!?!?

      Putting aside the faux surprise that anyone might think such a thing -- don't you think this might have been mentioned earlier? Like, back in, say, 1998?!?

    6. Re:Yesterday... by norwoodites · · Score: 1

      Huh, look at redhat. Don't say they just provide service contracts because that is just full of BS. The actually sell contracts on what they write (the old cygnus way, though from what I hear that business is going down but not because of open source vs closed source but from the fact new processors ISAs are being made as fast as they were once). For the processors, look at what is happening to the market, it is going to be a battle between only three processors, ARM, x86/x86_64, and PPC. This market is what drives most of cygnus'^wRedhat's business and it is just going down.

      Now Novell is letting go off a lot of people but if you read it correctly it is only the closed source guys which are being let go and not the Suse guys.

    7. Re:Yesterday... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      Well, aroung 1998 Eric wrote a big list of business methods for Open Source in the Cathedral and the Bazaar. History has proven most of them to be not all that effective. However, Open Source gets paid for and will continue to be paid for. How? Read the paper I linked to.

      Bruce

  17. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know what it means to exaggerate. What in the heck does it mean to overexaggerate? Does overexaggerate mean to exaggerate too much? Can someone exaggerate and not go to the extent of overexaggerating?

  18. released? by dlt074 · · Score: 1

    into the wild?

    1. Re:released? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet quite a lot of them are really wild now...

  19. Re:"Over exaggeration"? by bcmm · · Score: 2, Funny

    In this context, it doesn't mean "not very". It's like saying "Windows 3.1 isn't really an OS". Maybe it only makes sense in en_GB. I don't know.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  20. Also in business news... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > > more than 20% of the 5,800 man workforce
    >
    >Anyone got a torrent?

    In other news, 1160 ex-Novell employees said to be raising capital for hostile takeover of Krispy Kreme donut franchises, said to be interested in realigning business model with .torrent releases targeted directly at the Japanese pr0n market.

    Finally in business news, Fuller Brush Company stock is up 50% on the day. A spokesperson for Fuller Brush Company said that despite initial concerns about the Slashdotting of their website last Wednesday, no DDOS attack in fact took place. Credit card companies have reported no chargebacks from orders; none of the PCs from which orders were placed were zombies, despite a quintupling of sales of "brain brushes".

    1. Re:Also in business news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Credit card companies have reported no chargebacks from orders; none of the PCs from which orders were placed were zombies, despite a quintupling of sales of "brain brushes".

      I Hate You.

  21. over exaggeration by aktzin · · Score: 1

    Is that the opposite of "misunderestimation", as coined by a certain US President?

    --
    Quantum mechanics: the dreams that stuff is made of.
  22. Will there be a 20.1RC% release tomorrow? by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 0

    Were they being kept in the basement?

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  23. So It Is True! by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Funny
    20% of the 5,800 man workforce getting a pink slip

    So it is true! There really are no women in IT!

    I kid, I kid.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:So It Is True! by geomon · · Score: 1

      Actually this means that only the men are being fired.

      The women are safe.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    2. Re:So It Is True! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      The women are safe.

      I'm sure they'll both be relieved to hear that.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:So It Is True! by woolio · · Score: 1
      I think the original quote is correct.... 20% of the 5,800 man workforce got the pink slip

      WHY would they fire a woman in IT?????!?!??! Why!?!? The article just didn't state how many women were working at Novell. Only the men got fired.

      Or perhaps the managers are typically female... In which case, 20% of the male employees probably made passes at them.

  24. Simpsons Quote by kai.chan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Burns to Homer: You can considered yourself DOWNSIZED.
    Homer : What does that mean??
    Smithers: I think it means you're dismissed, Homer.
    Homer: Oh, good! Phew! Can I go back to work now?

  25. Release them? by l00k · · Score: 1

    Release them? As part of a coordinated tag and release programme I assume. We'll soon be seeing poor tagged IT professionals with broken wings and tracking bands for anklets arriving in flocks all round the country, perhaps stopping at a workplace near you. A pity.

    1. Re:Release them? by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      They sterilizing them prior to release in hopes they'll stem the population growth.
      ...be an over exaggeration In contrast to the dealy UNDER exaggeration.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  26. Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by billybob2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes $7/share is pretty tempting, but Novel's stock will only go up if they start being profitable. Novel had it coming to them when they bought Ximian, a gnome vendor that made a hodge podge of different products that are now dead (remember RedCarpet?). Novel should stick to SUSE/KDE and re-orient all its developers towards improving _only one_ application for each particular need (ie. YAST for installation/maintenance, KDE for desktop, etc).

    Novel's premier Linux distribution, SUSE, is historically based on KDE yet the individual projects that they're supporting (Beagle, Evolution) are gnome apps. I think in the long run KDE will become the de-facto standard primarily because of the tight integration among its applications and excitement in its developer and user base about KDE 4. If you don't believe me, take a look at how many more posts there are in KDE-Look than in Gnome-Look. In fact, there is KDE-Apps for independent apps built with the KDE/QT framework, while there is no such place to aggregate gnome apps.

    In conclusion, Novel should get their gnome developers to work on KDE so that they have a tightly integrated system with no duplicated functionality.

    1. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by maw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Red Carpet still exists. It's only been rebranded.

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    2. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Chapter80 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Novel's stock will only go up if they start being profitable.

      To be clear, Novell is profitable.

      EPS (ttm)=0.92 means that their Earnings Per Share for the Trailing Twelve Months was 92 cents a share. On a $7.47 share price (when I looked at the link, above), that's about 12% Earnings return on the share price (or a PE Ratio of 8.08).

      That's really not a horrible return. Not great, but not bad, considering some tech companies LOSE money. It's only as high as it is because the stock price is beaten down so badly. Of course, you need to consider FUTURE earnings, not past, when buying a stock.

      I'm no stock guru, but I do have what most would consider a sizeable portfolio, and I am in Novell at just over $6 (full disclosure here) for a few grand. So, yes, if I could encourage buying without touting the stock, I would. But I can't; that might be illegal.

    3. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... excitement in its developer and user base about KDE 4. If you don't believe me, take a look at how many more posts there are in KDE-Look than in Gnome-Look.

      This is just wrong. Yeah, the two sites you mention have similar names. But unless you can come up with a damn good reason of how they both are representative of the "excitement of its developer and user base" of KDE and Gnome, you're just astroturfing for mindshare.

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    4. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't believe me, take a look at how many more posts there are in KDE-Look than in Gnome-Look.

      KDE-look has been around for as long as I can remember. Gnome-look is around a year old, IIRC. Give it time to gather the numbers that kde-look has gathered and then you have a valid comparison.

      In fact, there is KDE-Apps for independent apps built with the KDE/QT framework, while there is no such place to aggregate gnome apps.

      http://www.gnomefiles.org/

      The place is hoppin'.

    5. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, one comment on Slashdot at +2 and I get this:
      Service Temporarily Unavailable The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.

    6. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by petermgreen · · Score: 0, Troll

      the trouble with KDE is it bases on Qt and that means if you wan't to legally make commercial software for it you have to pay trolltech which isn't very attractive.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by vagabond_gr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Novel's premier Linux distribution, SUSE, is historically based on KDE yet the individual projects that they're supporting (Beagle, Evolution) are gnome apps. I think in the long run KDE will become the de-facto standard primarily because of the tight integration among its applications and excitement in its developer and user base about KDE 4. If you don't believe me, take a look at how many more posts there are in KDE-Look than in Gnome-Look. In fact, there is KDE-Apps for independent apps built with the KDE/QT framework, while there is no such place to aggregate gnome apps.

      In conclusion, Novel should get their gnome developers to work on KDE so that they have a tightly integrated system with no duplicated functionality.

      WTF?

      Novell is a main contributor to Mono (very important to bring developers/applications to linux), Evolution (best Exchange alternative for linux), Beagle (best desktop search for linux), Hula, F-Spot, etc, all very important applications for linux that happen to be mostly built around gnome. And you suggest that they should abandon these apps and start working on KDE because you like it better and because some web site with kde screenshots happen to have more traffic that another one with similar name. I'm sorry but that's pure BS! Please stop trolling so bad because this is /. and sometimes trolls are modded as insightful.

      I don't care about the desktop wars. I use both gnome and kde apps and the only thing that I care about is having great quality apps for linux.

    8. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by bonius_rex · · Score: 1
      products that are now dead (remember RedCarpet?).

      IIRC, RedCarpet isn't quite dead. It's now a component of Zenworks Linux Management

    9. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can make commercial software under the GPL (for example). It's proprietary software that requires a fee.

    10. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. As if the Qt license was anything but pocket change for any serious commercial vendor.

      Compared to GTK, they'll *easily* save that amount on developer time alone.

    11. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not illegal, only if you have insider, non-public information about the company. in fact, you SHOULD be touting the stock as much as you can.

      i would recommend taking your profits though, gross profit last year was 64%, but even if net income was $31m which sounds impressive, but its onlya razor thin 2.6%. and since they're doing restructing, they probably have money/efficiency problems, and will face some rough waters. better to put that capital to better use, and then hop back on NOVL when the costcutting initiatives start to bear fruit.

    12. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by ezs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rebranded //and// extended. ZLM7 is much improved over Red Carpet Enterprise 2 and the first releases of ZENworks Linux Management. I know you (maw) know this - just posting for the slashdot record. :)

      --
      Evil ZEN Scientist
    13. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      ZLM7 is much improved over Red Carpet Enterprise 2

      "Improved" at the expense of backward compatibility. Why doesn't ZLM 7 support SLES 8? I know the answer is that the required Mono version isn't available on the 2.4 kernel, but don't any *customers* still use and deploy SLES 8 due to ISV constraints? And after such a major re-write, why is the client command-line interface still called "rug"? It doesn't work the same way. It isn't backward compatible. It doesn't take the same arguements, or even use the same paradigms.

      Please don't take this as the harsh criticism it's probably coming across as, but I was very excitied about ZLM 7, and I was very disappointed when I started using it. When a new system doesn't support 75% of your existing servers, and all your admins need to be re-trained, it sort of loses its value.
    14. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by eldacan · · Score: 1

      The more serious issues of your post being already discussed by other people, I'll just point out one ridiculous claim:

      In fact, there is KDE-Apps for independent apps built with the KDE/QT framework, while there is no such place to aggregate gnome apps.

      Apart from the fact that the relevance of this is obscure to me, I have to wonder how you did your research... You could have typed "gnome-apps.org" and find a site with GNOME apps. Or you could have searched for "gnome apps" in Google, the 4th result has a quite informative title: "GnomeFiles - GNOME/GTK+ Software Repository". This is the well known GNOME counterpart to kde-apps.org.

    15. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Hosiah · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that told you, you...mindshare-astroturfer, you!

    16. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by stor · · Score: 1

      I think in the long run KDE will become the de-facto standard primarily because of the tight integration among its applications and excitement in its developer and user base about KDE 4.

      That logic does not follow dude. I do hope KDE4 is awesome though and it's users enjoy it. I hope the next Gnome release is awesome too.

      take a look at how many more posts there are in KDE-Look than in Gnome-Look.

      My God man! The sub-project-forum-number-of-posts indicator! That's some solid data!

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    17. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
      it's not illegal, only if you have insider, non-public information about the company. in fact, you SHOULD be touting the stock as much as you can.

      No, I believe it is illegal. Check out this article about people who were charged for using Pump and Dump tactics, which I believe are illegal. (I am not a lawyer, but if it sounds sleazy, it could be illegal.)

    18. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      I agree with you but I see some history here.

      SuSe is and has been a KDE desktop environment.

      Novell was not in the Linux business.

      Novell bought SuSE.

      Novell bought some other Linux companies

      Novell employed the .NOT errr .Net guy Miguel....

      Novell focused on GNOME, while SuSe still is KDE heavy. (yes I know GNOME support is good)

      My question is What the hell was Novell thinking? The previous poster is somewhat correct in that more people do run KDE. So if Novell is commited to SuSE and GNOME, then they probably should have released a statement that they are going to focus totally on KDE and little to no effort is going in to KDE. However, after sitting through a few Novell presentations lately, they don't seem to send that message at all. In short here is their message.

      Linux is ready for the desktop.
      Sun is evil.
      Linux runs great on IBM hardware.
      If you can't run Microsoft C# on linux then Linux won't be a viable solution in the future.
      Red Carpet allows you to manage different Linux "clients" via Edirectory.
      If you choose IBM, and Novell that is better than Sun because you will have "One throat to choke" if something goes wrong". I had to laugh at that one...

      Now for some reason they are quiet about these issues.
      How to migrate off of Windows SERVERS to Linux SERVERS.
      How to manage Windows, Linux and Solaris servers with NDS.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    19. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor old Novell. Lo, how the mighty have fallen. And by their own hand.
      I had clients begging for SLOX, which is very promising but still half baked, and Novell was totally disinterested. They kept pushing GroupWise, which I couldn't give away. The won't help support SLOX installs, so I finally bowed to the marketplace and sold M$ Exchange. Argh. I dumped dozens of qualified SUSE leads on their reps here in N. Virginia, and they finally told me to stick it. I gave up, and went with RH.

    20. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      you pretty much can't make money by selling the software itself under the gpl because as soon as a few copies are out there someone is bound to start redistributing it either free or for a lower charge than you and you will have no recourse because you put the software under the GPL.

      sure you can sell support but thats only feasible with certain types of software

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    21. Re:Support _only_ KDE and SUSE by johnMG · · Score: 1

      > In fact, there is KDE-Apps for independent apps built with the KDE/QT
      > framework, while there is no such place to aggregate gnome apps.

      Sure there is: http://www.gnomefiles.org/

  27. I vet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope I don't catch the Mono.

    I too amz amazed out how much cumz in the project are infectious Mono.

    Stay awayz from meesa.

  28. New Zealand and Novel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Didn't the New Zealand government just announce a big partnership with Novel? How are they reacting to all this negative news coming out of the company?

    1. Re:New Zealand and Novel? by skingers6894 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Didn't the New Zealand government just announce a big partnership with Novel? How are they reacting to all this negative news coming out of the company?"

      They are offering the newly released Novell employees jobs in New Zealand. So far no takers...

    2. Re:New Zealand and Novel? by barefootgenius · · Score: 1

      Where's New Zealand......oh hold on I live there.

      IRD (Inland Revenue Department) is thinking about switching over to Novell with Linux desktops as far as I know. Some of the other departments run under Novell at the moment, Unitec New Zealand (a quasi university) runs Novell with XP Pro on the desktops and teach's Novell Netware in their Network Admin and Support course.

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
  29. Old News - Submitted and Rejected by segedunum · · Score: 1

    I submitted this days ago when it actually was news, and it got rejected. Bloody Slashdot :-).

  30. Not true, not true! by mister_llah · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's just that Novell wants to cut down on the number of long bearded, frighteningly overweight men in IT... and increase the ratio of long bearded, frighteningly overweight women in IT... :D

    ===

    Stereotypes are fun!

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  31. why does everyone think novell is so good by bigalsenior · · Score: 0

    netware is crap it cant sustain our collage network without crashing at least onec a day. we have 5 or six servers serviceing 400 pcs at once and some times (monday morning is the worst) it can take as long as 10 mins to get logged in and the clients are quite fast. (cel 2.4 512 meg ram ) and the windows client is bloated to hell. they should be fired it might persude the rest to make a better product. personally i think microsofts active directory is better and faster (mod me down karma is for pussys)

    1. Re:why does everyone think novell is so good by segedunum · · Score: 1

      netware is crap it cant sustain our collage network without crashing at least onec a day. we have 5 or six servers serviceing 400 pcs at once and some times

      I'm sorry, I had to double check that you weren't talking about Windows there. You're just plain lying. Netware as a server is extremely solid for this sort of thing. The client could be better, but you're not going to get the management tools or anything like Zenworks from Microsoft.

      personally i think microsofts active directory is better and faster

      Well, it would help if you said why, but you won't be able to.

    2. Re:why does everyone think novell is so good by zap_branigan · · Score: 1

      netware is crap it cant sustain our collage network without crashing at least onec a day. we have 5 or six servers serviceing 400 pcs at once and some times You are a complete idiot then. I have over 100 Netware 6.0 and 6.5 servers and they only time they go down is when I want to patch for functionality. We have about 80,000 users as well. That you said MAD is faster and more efficient than eDirectory definitely makes me think your an idiot.

    3. Re:why does everyone think novell is so good by Phishcast · · Score: 1
      Okay, the only responses to your post are tearing you to pieces and here's why... A single Netware server can handle the load you're talking about and without really breaking much of a sweat. I've done it myself, it works, and it's not all that hard if you know what you're doing. Don't flame Netware, you don't know it or understand it. Whoever is running your envirmonment is doing something severely wrong. Get a Windows adminstrator doing something severely wrong and you'll be in pain too.

      Your blame is misplaced, or in other words, yor collage netwerk wud suk az bad if yor wind0ze adminz wur foolz.

    4. Re:why does everyone think novell is so good by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I can see why there is so much frustration with netware as it always seem to rely on that second OS for the frontend. Like a windows box. Netware do have alot of problems, but scaling is no where on that list.

    5. Re:why does everyone think novell is so good by robpoe · · Score: 1

      What he's saying IS possible. If you have Windoze admins running a Netware box, you probably DO have issues like that.

      However, it probably isn't Netware's fault.

      Background: I took over the Netware part of a 4000 user network. They had daily Netware crashes, instability of the NDS, and just "BAD THINGS"(TM) going on.

      They looked to me (the Netware guru) to fix it. I told the bosses that I would and could fix it, but they had to lend FULL CONTROL of all decisions relating TO the Netware servers. I rebuilt the server (ok, re-installed onto a different machine) holding the root of the tree, un-partitioned things that NEVER should have been partitioned, cleaned up some VERY bad NDS replicas (i.e. make a change to the replica ring, and lock up some servers) the had way.. All of the above were symptoms of BAD administration of the Netware stuff..

      Once I got done with that, the only downtime we had was when I requested / performed whatever it was I needed to do.

      And the bosses smiled in happiness. Now, if only Microsoft didn't EXTORT the company into "switching".

      --
      = Grow a brain...
    6. Re:why does everyone think novell is so good by bigalsenior · · Score: 0

      ok so i have a few replies. 1. the MAD system did have fewer users (around 100 at any one time) but it also had by ratio less server that were less powerful (1 server dual p3 933 1 gig ram i think) compared to (6 dual xeons) so it is faster. BUT i do think these admions are idiots. there is a desktop network message and it is constantly being changed by students. so i think there it is more hte admins fault more than anything. thanks to the few guys who knew what they were talking about that enlightend me i wont be as quick to judge next time.

  32. NetWare 6.5 here, GroupWise 7, ZENworks 6.0. by khasim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Novell's old products are great. But their sales force sucks beyond belief. They are one of the few companies where you have to defeat their sales force to get them to sell you anything.

    And you had better know exactly what you want because they're not going to offer any advice.

    The only time you'll see/hear a Novell rep is when a tech support company goes cruising for clients. The Novell reps love to be driven around to see customers that they wouldn't ever call on their own.

    I could double Novell's sales with nothing more than a two line phone and an email account. Seriously. Microsoft takes executives from potential clients to expensive dinners. Novell won't even waste a phone call on an existing customer. They won't even let you know when new products come out that could fit with the stuff they have on record that they sold you.

    1. Re:NetWare 6.5 here, GroupWise 7, ZENworks 6.0. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well put. I'd mod this up Informative rather than Interesting because I've seen the same thing. The products are decent enough, but getting our Novell rep to actually give us information or a demo of their software is like pulling teeth. They can't even accurately describe to you what their software is supposed to do. It's a research excercise to figure out if their solution fits your problem.

      We've got a Novell moron that shows up at our (large) university once in a while to present to all the technical folks. These are people that use and even love Novell software. They want to buy more. They'll ask said moron if Novell's software can make farts smell good, and he'll smile and say yes. If you manage to arrange a real demonstration, he does it himself and it's a freaking joke.

      I ran Novell servers for 5 years from Netware 4.11 through 6.5. Their directory service is fantastic. Too bad they aren't able to adequately promote that message. I hope SuSE stays alive through their bumblings, it's always been one of my favorite distros.

  33. A stock buy-back is in the works (supposedly). by khasim · · Score: 1

    So, depending .... yes, now might be a good time to buy Novell stock.

    Not to mention that the big drop in employee salaries and such will kick up the profit/expense ratio (assuming flat profits).

    All of which just thrills the Street. The question is, can you get back out soon enough, at a profit before it comes down again?

    1. Re:A stock buy-back is in the works (supposedly). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since the stock buy-back and potential layoffs are well known, it's probably factored into the price of the stock. So don't buy based on those facts. Buy based on the fact that it's a good "bottom fishing" type stock.

      How low can it go? haha I have some of those stocks from the dot-com era.. stocks that I bought for thousands of dollars - now it'd cost more to have the stock certificate printed on a laser printer than the stock is worth. SAD!

      Still, I like Novell. Hard to pass this one up. As long as they keep driving toward higher profits, we'll be in good shape!

  34. that article is bullshit by idlake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Novell didn't "trip over its Linux strategy". Novell's primary product, Netware, was dead when Microsoft finally incorporated equivalent functionality into Windows. That's what the company "tripped over". Novell was essentially dead before they started doing anything with Linux. I find it amazing that they have managed to stay so relevant and important, and their acquisitions of SuSE and their support of Mono look like excellent ideas.

    There is no way that their move into Linux was ever going to keep them going at their past levels. That's neither surprising, nor is it Linux's fault. You can make a decent business out of FOSS, but it's not going to be a cash cow like Windows or the old Novell.

    I frankly can't judge whether Novell is executing right with SuSE. But the quality of SuSE as a distribution has been consistently high, and they have a good shot at selling to businesses, in particular in the European markets. I hope they'll make it, alongside RedHat and a completely free Debian; we need more and smaller companies, not a few behemoths. And, to me, the Linux distributions strike a good balance between compatibility and diversity.

    1. Re:that article is bullshit by Otter · · Score: 1
      There is no way that their move into Linux was ever going to keep them going at their past levels. That's neither surprising, nor is it Linux's fault. You can make a decent business out of FOSS, but it's not going to be a cash cow like Windows or the old Novell.

      I'd say that's a pretty fair assessment of Novell's situation.

    2. Re:that article is bullshit by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      Yes, they won't make as much as MS or the old Novell. With the commoditization of computer technology we should expect that. The market is maturing.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    3. Re:that article is bullshit by khallow · · Score: 1

      I must satisfy my inner pedant here. Market maturation doesn't imply commodization. There are plenty of examples of markets that settled down into high margin oligopolies (eg, US car market in the 60's, US banks, US brokerages, US refineries). I think there'll still be a huge, long term, high margin market for adopting computer technology to business.

  35. "Released" by ddent · · Score: 1

    First they "lose" their employees (what, you can't find them?). Then they "let them go" (as if they wanted to). Now they "release" them (from what, a prison cell?). The euphemisms just keep getting better!

  36. Huh? by Moofie · · Score: 1

    "over exaggeration"

    As opposed to an under exaggeration?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  37. No problem... by kalbzayn · · Score: 1

    Google will hire them. They are hiring everybody.

  38. PHP Developer Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the folks involved with this story may be reading this story. If so, and you happen to be a experienced PHP developer, please respon to this advert.

  39. One Word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LANTASTIC!!!

  40. Identity management by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jack Messman says Novell now has two primary businesses: identity management and open source. That's the business Novell wants to go after, anyway. I think it has a decent amount of what you call legacy-support business as well, but it's constantly shrinking.

    Identity management is a pretty hot area right now and a lot of companies want a piece of it, including the big guys like IBM and Sun. Novell remains a leader, however, largely because it has a superior directory product.

    I wrote an article profiling Novell and it's current business prospects last year. It still pretty much holds. Try to look past the fact that it quotes Laura DiDio -- before joining the ranks of the "notorious foes of Linux," she covered Novell for years and years.

    The latest news is that Novell's shareholders have been pressuring it to focus more and more on Linux and open source. I'm not sure that's necessarily the best move, because I don't think Suse Linux is generating all that much revenue so far. The open source angle seems to be perceived as the "sexiest" way to go forward, however, with the hope of reviving the Novell brand.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  41. 'Release' the Marketing Department!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Your post, and the many replies explaining Novell's strengths, perfectly showcases Novell's biggest problem. They have had the worst big corporation marketing department I have ever seen!

    I was at their huge 'BrainShare' conference last year, and the keynote address each day takes place in a huge convention center set up with fancy audio/video & graphics for 6000 attendees. With all the money they spent, it was the worst/most boaring event of the day each of the three times they had it. Their print marketing is horrible, their graphic identity (a bunch of black and white pictures of yuppies in wierd poses) and everything else about their marketing is just putrid.

    As others have stated, their Identity management products for large organizations can't be beat. Their full fledged jump into being a complete enterprise linux vendor, from the desktop to the server room, is a great move. They just need to find a way to get non-novell users to realize this!

  42. 20% Open Source employees! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice now they're even opening their workforce for everyone to use!

  43. 5,800 man workforce? by MMHere · · Score: 1

    Hey! They're in violation of equal opportunity hiring laws if they have no women on staff.

    Oh, wait. They're in Utah. All the women must be at home in order to have that polygamy thing work...

    1. Re:5,800 man workforce? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      Not true, troll. They merely have to offer jobs to females. This isn't Soviet Russia, despite what Hillary says.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:5,800 man workforce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was meant as a joke, albeit a rather weak one.

  44. In comes the Grim Reaper by blacknerd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One has got to believe that Novell will not remain an independent company for long. How long before CA, the grim reaper of IT, will acquire them, fire the remaining 80% and suck the legacy customers dry for maintenance revenue at inflated rates until they finally are fed to Microsoft? You heard it here first. Gartner analysts? - here's a new idea for you to pitch now that CA is your best buddy... (read the Ilumin acquisition press releases...) CA has always wanted an operating system anyway.... Cheers. -blacknerd

  45. Typical classical management by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is to get rid of employees when things are not profitable, rather than try and fix the problems causing expenses to be so high. Something like job cost accounting could be used to find the products and services that cost more to support than the revenue they bring in. Then either remove the products and services that are not profitable, or use quality control to improve them so there does not need a lot of expenses in supporting them anymore.

    An example of this was when Apple was bleeding billions of dollars. They got rid of unprofitable products like the Newton, scanners, printers, Pippin, etc, and improved the Macintosh quality and features, until the company started to show a profit again. Of course they also downsized, but if they did things correctly they would not have to downsize. Keep in mind that they found new markets to be profitable in like music and video files, and the iPod.

    There is some risk involved in doing that, but anything in business has a certain degree of risk.

    Novell ought to see if Netware is costing more to support than the revenue it brings in. Sadly there are still organizations using Netware 3.X on MS-DOS and older Windows based workstations. If Novell was smart, they'd find a product or service to offer these organizations, or allow them to upgrade the Netware 3.X servers to a version of SuSE Linux with the Netware server application designed for the older servers, and then use SAMBA to connect to Windows clients as well. Perhaps Novell could make a deal with a PC maker to bundle SuSE Linux on their workstations and servers. Maybe make a SuSE Linux based rackmount server for web, email, IM, and other functions with some PC maker.

    Anyway Novell ought to see what new markets they can get into, perhaps partner up with IBM/Lotus, Oracle, Sun, or even contribute to the Mozilla Foundation.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Typical classical management by riversky · · Score: 1

      How would they make money (needed to pay people's salaries) if they join a non-profit like the Mozilla Foundation?? Unless you can make money on the service side of Open Source software, the whole point is to get everything cheap including labor (or free labor in the community)....I just was at a talk with a number of VC companies in which the idea was how to bring labor costs to ZERO in OpenSource if the product produced by that labor is free, and make money selling the brand/advertising to the bigger company and so on. Investors/VC see this as the money making way to make multi millions. By the way Apple did a large downsizing that almost killed them when times were tough in the early and mid nineties.

    2. Re:Typical classical management by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      It is very simple really. You join Mozilla, license something like Bugzilla and then charge for customization to it to make a customized version for each organization because they all have different needs and the standard Bugzilla doesn't do all that they want it to do. Part of the contract for customization requires that the code created can be submitted back into Mozilla for use in the regular version of it that Mozilla controls.

      All the client organization is paying for is the labor to create the custimized code, and not the original version itself. You see, this way, the client pays for the labor for open source code, and as they agree to it, that code can be put into the standard/regular version to honor the OSS license.

      Come to think of it, they could create a customized version of Firefox to do things that Mozilla lists as a WONTFIX because they are just features, and things that do not follow the HTML standards. The client organization can pay for the labor to add features to Novell's version of Firefox (Maybe call it Novfox) that the Mozilla Foundation refuses to add.

      IBM/Lotus, well they could help them port the Lotus software to Linux, and then share in the licensing fees. I mean if MS-Office won't be available for Linux, maybe the Lotus Office Suite can be ported to Linux? That would be a commercial software package that they can be an OEM for IBM/Lotus to sell. Perhaps they can port Lotus Notes or Lotus Domino to Linux as well?

      Yeah Apple did classical management until Jobs returned in 1996. H. Ross Perot had helped Steve Jobs with Next, in running it using new business management theories and ideas. The early 1990s to mid 1990's (1995), Apple was acting like a classical management run organization and at the first sign of a loss, downsized their employees and it almost killed them. Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1996, and knew a better form of business management and found unprofitable products and services like the Newton, scanners, printers, etc. and cut them out, and later replaced them with new products and services like iTunes and the iPod, which proved to be more profitable later.

      I hope this has been educational for some people, in finding a better way of business management than just downsizing employees at the first sign of a loss.

      In a nutshell, there are two ways to turn a loss into a profit. Either decrease expenses, or increase revenue. Sometimes you can do both. Cutting employees is stupid because it can cost up to 10 times their annual salary to recruit someone to replace them later when business picks up. Plus you have to train that new employee to the way your organization does business.

      An alternative is to offer sabbaticals from work for six months to a year or more at 20% or 30% salary, and the employee is still an employee but you giv e them a cell phone and laptop and they check in from time to time. They are free to go back to college, take care of family members, or work another job. When business picks up they can end their sabbatical and return to full-time work and a full-time salary. Those who went to college will be more valuable employees when they return, those who took care of family members will be happier with the quality time they had, and those who worked other jobs will increase their experience and skills and become more valuable employees.

      Remember that an employee is not an expense and is very valuable and important to the functioning of the organization. You want them to have the best benefits so they can have health insurance and be healthy and happy, have college tuition to increase their knowledge, have a 401K or savings program to plan for retirement, and the more benefits you give them, the less likely they will leave for a competitor. This also shows the organization meeting the needs of the social customers, as they will see that the organization really cares about its employees and people in general and this will give good PR, the kind you cannot buy.

      Basically there are four type of customers yo

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:Typical classical management by starwed · · Score: 1

      Actually Novell was partnering with Mozilla, working on XForms. However, it seems that with the cutbacks, that's no longer the case. (I might have misunderstood something, but that's what the blog entry seems to say.)

    4. Re:Typical classical management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I'm sure that Novell hasn't performed any trivial analysis regarding what areas of the company are profitable or not. It's not as if they have financial statements that they make on a regular basis detailing anything like that to their shareholders. It's a good thing the CFO of absolutely nowhere suggested this incredibly insightful idea on Slashdot.

      Downsizing makes a lot of sense, and is not functionally distinct from any other service-trimming endeavors. If you intend to cease product lines, removing excess employees makes perfect sense. Even if you intend to maintain the current strategy, reducing the overhead of your workforce by removing superfluous staff is quite rational.

    5. Re:Typical classical management by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Financial statements do not show which products and services are profitable or not, that was why job cost accounting was developed. If you took accounting classes or business management classes like I did, you'd know that. Obviously you did not.

      Employees can be retrained for products and services that are profitable, rather than taking them outside and shooting them.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    6. Re:Typical classical management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have clearly never actually read a 10Q, have you? Do you ever know how these statements are prepared?

  46. Obligatory by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    Phase 1: Release Employees
    Phase 2: ???
    Phase 3: Profit

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  47. They're object oriented by vadim_t · · Score: 4, Funny

    foreach NovellWorker Worker in CurrentlyHired {
            if( Worker.TooOld || Worker.EarnsTooMuch || Worker.HatedByBobInAccounting ) {
                  Worker.Release();
                  Worker.Dispose();
            }
    }

    1. Re:They're object oriented by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Interesting. but why would the workers carry around methods for their own destruction?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  48. How bad does that suck? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    How bad does your work environment have to suck to start describing layoffs in prison terms?

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:How bad does that suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for Novell (I wasn't laid off today, luckily), and my work environment is quite nice, actually. Thanks for your concern!

    2. Re:How bad does that suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on keeping your job; I also work for Novell, and yesterday was pretty stressful for me (my office is in Provo, but I work from home in Salt Lake most of the time). My position was eliminated as part of the restructuring (hell, my entire team was disbanded), but I was fortunate to have someone looking out for me, and they picked me up immediately, so I'm just moving sideways into another department.

      You gotta love this new math they're using, don't you? 600 (the reported number of people laid off) is not 20% of ~5,000. It's wonderful to see that regardless of what happens in the world, someone in the press will be there to misrepresent the facts or to invent numbers to make things look worse than they actually are.

    3. Re:How bad does that suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's wonderful to see that regardless of what happens in the world, someone in the press will be there to misrepresent the facts or to invent numbers to make things look worse than they actually are.

      Even better were the reports that 300 people in SUSE were going to be laid off, when they really ended up firing 30. Which is bad, but not that bad.

    4. Re:How bad does that suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah; it seems like those reporting the news seem to think that they have to invent it rather than base it on facts. Of course, when there are no facts available, you've got to say something.

      Reminds me to an extent of the Daily Show last week where Jon Stewart was poking fun at the news media reporting that there was nothing to report relating to the indictments in Washington DC. But then they had "breaking news" because there was movement - but it was a false alarm - the grand jury was breaking for lunch.

      What a sad, sad state for our news media.

  49. Hmm by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Is the CEO that spends their time coming up with new ways to say 'kicked out' going to be 'moving on' or 'exploring different career options'?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  50. yay open source by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

    you may want to watch where you're pointing that gun...after all, you only have one foot left now

  51. Clearly not diverse... by toupsie · · Score: 1
    which many have speculated could result in more than 20% of the 5,800 man workforce getting a pink slip

    So only men are getting the "pink slip"? This is either sexist or homophobic. I can't figure which.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Clearly not diverse... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      you all misunderstand. What they're really doing is making 20% of the guys that work there wear colorful, lacy underthings.

      I'm going to go gouge out my eyes now...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  52. Welcome to the Wild Kingdom... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    "Hello, welcome to Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom!" ...

    "Jim Fowler will be attaching these harmless radio collars to the employees before they are released. This will allow us to track them as they find new homes in the wild. Hopefully this information can be used by scientists to ensure a healthy and growing employee population."

    "If your family is healthy and growing, you should consider purchasing insurance from Mutual of Omaha to help with all of life's little mishaps."

                                                              -- Marlin Perkins

    -- Terry

  53. Why push this? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I used to do KDE development (need to get back to it), and I have no desire to see only one desktop out there. Yeah, Sun (and some of the old *nix world) would like see a single desktop. But that comes from the fear of what happened in the *nix world. But the real problem was not that there were parallel projects, but that they did not cooperate. The real battle was dominately between HP and Sun. They both wanted to win. So they each offered up desktops that differed and did not use similar conf. files. Likewise in MS vs. Borland OWL; Of course, Borland was killed by MS's tactics, but that was a different issue.

    Gnome and KDE can co-exist very nicely. In fact, there are many things that Gnome learns from KDE and visa-versa. If Novell sees the value in KDE, they will invest in it. If not, than another company will. For example; Mandrake.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  54. This isn't speculation by ninja_pirate · · Score: 0

    Flash news from Provo, UT. This isn't speculation. They cut 20% of their employees today.

  55. please only the womans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use them as you wish.
    If you let someone else to use them, you must give up the ownership, but that's ok, because you will never do that!

  56. This is why I never use commercial linux distros by ylikone · · Score: 1
    You never know when Novell will just drop Suse. You never know when Redhat will drop free redhat and give the community the crappy fedora. You never know when the almight dollar is behind it.

    I prefer sticking with Linux distros like Debian or Slackware, etc... I know when I wake up tomorrow that they will still be there.

    --
    Meh.
  57. WITH release by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    I read it as they're going to give massages.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  58. Mono-XFORMS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Firefox Xforms project however will lose out because they fired that employee.

    http://www.beaufour.dk/blog-archives/2005/11/abeau fournolong_1.html

    1. Re:Mono-XFORMS. by Maian · · Score: 1

      He's not a core Firefox developer, but a developer working on Firefox nevertheless. If anybody wants to support XForms or Firefox in general, someone please lend him a job :)

  59. Novell analysis Part 1 The current situation. by randyjg2 · · Score: 1

    The main problem with Linux sales is that risk adverse enterprise managers have little evidence that a serious Linux based project will succeed.

    Novell is well positioned to change that view, IF they make the right moves.

    Novell has two major assets in the technology space. The first is SUSe 10, and the second is their identity management servers.

    Let me explain. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 is a rock solid distro, and technically does everything it needs to do, which is why it's leading the market...for now.

    It is also 1) boring 2) conservative, 3) requires a lot of work to integrate into a typical large enterprise. This is mainly because Red Hat's wants to keep that "rock solid" reputation, and thus doesn't readily embrace new technology.

    Not a bad idea, except that those new technologies are whats needed to integrate into a serious enterprise environment.

    Novell's SUSe 10 is a lot more adventurous, and besides not being boring, it has all the technology needed to do a end to end implementation of a large enterprise application right out of the box (well, wire, actually, since you can download it).

    All of this software is available in the OSS community, so it is available to Red Hat as well, but it isn't integrated, and therefore requires a LOT of work and expertise to connect together.

    Work that doesn't show up as realization of business goals on an enterprise managers ROI scorecard.

    Red Hat could duplicate that, but it will take a while. Don't get me wrong, I am aware of the wonderful work being done by say, JPackage with Apache, ObjectWeb, Tigris and other OSS communities , but it is not at the same level that you get with SUSe at the moment. (Installing an RPM is not quite the same as getting it to play nicely with everything else on the machine, which is where most of the work comes in).

    The other really good feature is that Novell makes the commercial version of SUSe downloable with no time restrictions (though they call it the evaluation version) This is the major feature that attracted everybody to Redhat initially, and is the other major weakness of RedHat now.

    When RedHat branched their free version off to Fedora, they lost most of their momentum to Ubuntu. You can't develop something on Fedora (even if it were stable)and be guaranteed it will work on Red Hat Enterprise, it's diverged too much, so why bother?

    Red Hat is coasting on past good will and reputation right now, and SUSe 10 is exciting enough, from a users, developers and managers perspective, that it might easily turn the market around; if they do it right...

    (continued in next post... what Novell needs to do.)

  60. Re:This is why I never use commercial linux distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right, wake up tommorow and Slackware will be there! The single person behind this distribution has major health problems. Even a person with perfect health can get run over by a bus.

  61. help me out here...Who needs whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Their hope of the future is migrating all their existing features to run over Linux."

    Lets see if I get this? You say that there products work, and are reliable. But in the next you say that their future is Linux. Why? Is all their stuff suddenly going to go all wonky if it doesn't get imported to Linux? Maybe what you should have said is that Linux's hope of the future needs Novell to migrate all their features over.

    1. Re:help me out here...Who needs whom? by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      The company says their future is with Linux. Most of us who use their products would probably be fine using them without Linux. It's their dwindling market share that is pushing them toward Linux as a way to put themselves back in a growing market.

      One problem Netware had that cost them market share was the level of sophistication required to write applications to run on the server. The number of native apps available for Netware has never been very high, and is dwindling. When those apps come into an enterprise computer room now they are coming wrapped in some other OS, like Windows.

      By embracing Linux, Novell hopes to reverse this trend and have their signature products, like directory services, IDM, etc, running on a box that is also capable of running many third party applications and is not hard to develop for.

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
  62. :Novell analysis Part 2: A new beginning (maybe) by randyjg2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think Novell is going to have much in the way of difficulty capturing mindshare among the OSS and Linux user community. There is a few things they need to do (a better Yast, small utilities like service and slocate, etc) but the general feel of Suse 10 is that it is fairly well along to being rock solid itself. The momentum is building, and many of the community that once despised SUSe for releasing their product as source only, now feel that way about Red Hat.

    Enterprise managers, however, are a different proposition. Red Hat is the linux "brand name"., and Red Hat legitimately earned that title with their tireless work over the past years. They were the major reason Linux is a serious contender in the industry.

    However, Red Hat is coasting on thier reputation, and, outside of that reputation , the competition between Novell and Red Hat is pretty much even. Neither side has serious mindshare among the enterprise managers, who are mostly just experimenting at this stage.

    Red Hat will have a lot of serious enterprise implementations to point to soon, they are in a number of companies. However, that won't be convincing to your average manager, since they will see it as one off successes, not a validation.

    The deal maker will be a reference implementation, that managers can see as as something they customize, rather than create. Neither side has that yet, though Novell seems much better situated to deliver it.

    It isn't simply the wider or more bleeding edge scope of SUSe10 versus RHEL4, it also Novelles Identity Management solutions. Identity Management is at the heart of most major enterprise projects today, and Novell is the "Red Hat" of that industry (rock solid, boring, unadventurous). Identity Management is something that enterprise managers can relate to on their ROI scorecard, unlike OS's, which CFO's don't understand or care about.

    So, to summarise, Novell needs to create a reference Enterprise Application, complete with an openly availble (a la Oracle) though not necessarily open source, Identity Management suite, and start demoing that to enterprise managers. Combined with pressure from the techie side, it should be enough to give Novell at least a fighting chance in dominating this still nascent industry niche. In true OSS fashion, they can do it by making alliances with a number of the smaller consulting organizations that have good track records and reputations in these sort of enterprise applications.

  63. That's buggy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You should add

    "!Worker.IsExecutive"

    ... to that if statement. Not that I've got anything in particular against Novell ...

    Oh wait, Executives fall into a completely different class than Workers. My bad.

  64. Ximian Red Carpet by ezs · · Score: 1

    Red Carpet lives and breathes as ZENworks Linux Management. In fact //I// have posted a few times on Slashdot about that transition. The Red Carpet - now ZENworks Linux Management - engineering team are alive and well and working on the next release of the ZENworks Linux Management product line. [As an aside - I know Slashdot is renowned for the innacuracy of posts - but this one just seems steeped in Gnome/KDE politics... Gnome, KDE - I really don't care so long as it's not the Win32 Shell...]

    --
    Evil ZEN Scientist
  65. About time too! by permaculture · · Score: 1

    Release the Novell 20!

    These management euphemisms get more and more abstruse. :(

    --
    Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
  66. Re:When will this stupid argument die? by Dimble+ThriceFoon · · Score: 1

    probably only when the cretins espousing it lose at the evolution game.

  67. Release? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Is that a bit like how foetuses are prematurely 'released' from the womb?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  68. Over exaggeration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's an 'over exaggeration'? I think we need some sort of less non-inaccurate misunderestimation of linguistic abilities with Slashdot editors here.

  69. Stock options by nairobiny · · Score: 1

    FYI, this week's Economist suggests that, once Novell is required to expense the fair value of employee stock option grants, its profitability will be halved. That's before any of this restructuring is taken into account.

    Yes, I know that this shouldn't affect market valuations. But it may surprise your more casual investor.

  70. Re:This is why I never use commercial linux distro by ylikone · · Score: 1

    A person or two dying will not a distro kill. The key to truly free Linux distros is that there is a huge community behind them.

    --
    Meh.
  71. Is that the new name for layoff - release? by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

    Because release makes it sound like they are imprisoned, trapped, and want to be freed from their current working environment/capacity - like they are doing them a favor.

  72. pattangi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like you better start reading up for your mcse or you'll be out of a job :(

  73. My experience by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I've been CEO of two businesses, and I am starting up a third. The first business I sold to my partner, and the second is still running.

    I hold a bachelors of science in business management with a 3.91 GPA. I do business consulting for various businesses.

    You are the CFO of nowhere, Mr./Ms. Anonymous Coward.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a jobless, whiny shit with a degree from a community college and a diploma farm. You sit around writing insane babble on the Internet all day while complaining about your emotional problems and deciding whether the Internet persona you've constructed does or does not reflect who you are. Who you are, is a loser. You have no experience running a real business, so please continue to enlighten us with your trivial understanding of OR.

  74. Beaufour gone by DJCater · · Score: 1

    Allan Beaufour Larsen, Mozilla's lead XForms developers has gone; a great shame.

    --
    Sig Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  75. I got laid off from Novell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got "released" from Novell yesterday.

    I'm not going to say anymore lest Novell hunt me down here and try to revoke my severance package for divulging any sensitive information, or the SEC run me down for offering insider information (of which I actually have very little).