Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Linux-Based Satellite

An anonymous reader writes "For $10 million, SpaceDev is offering a Linux-based microsatellite that can be controlled over the internet using any laptop or desktop computer. The Modular Microsat Bus utilizes such things as plug and play USB, Ethernet, and other standards, while providing critical features such as power, maneuvering, and communication for you. Up to 40 kg of project space are at your disposal"

184 comments

  1. I'll take two by robertjw · · Score: 4, Funny

    At that price I'll take two, they're small.

    1. Re:I'll take two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they can only provide 80 watts of power to the payload, there goes my dreams of orbiting a Pentium 4 desktop...

    2. Re:I'll take two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the price is so cheap (yes, $10 million is kind of cheap) it makes it very scary to think how many government satellites are up there.... (Government has billions. Trillions.)

  2. FP by khedron+the+jester · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apparently you launch it by throwing it really, really hard.

  3. $10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is cool...but 'way out of my league. For those that have got $10 million to spare, have fun. What I'd like is a picosatelliteo coop.

    These students got theirs into space for $120,000. Sure, that doesn't include "donated material, equipment and expertise", or the estimated $40,000 launch cost, but let's be optimistic and call it $250,000 all told. Well, get 50 people in and it's only $5000 each -- less than a good used car. Make it 500 people and you've got the cost down to less than a trip for two to Vegas. And for this I get to help send a satellite running Linux into space -- as close as I'm likely to come to making the trip myself.

    I know that ham radio folks are already doing this sort of thing, but they've got their own goals. I admit, mine are a bit fuzzy beyond "put this L33+ satellite into space", but that's kind of appealing too. What could we cram on a picosatellite? What imaging can you do for cheap -- what resolution, what wavelengths? And of course, the question everyone wants answered: Can you host a webserver in space, and could it survive a Slashdotting?

    I think something like this would be cool beyond measure. Who's in?

  4. The perfect Christmas gift for an evil scientist by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

    I hear that a Mr. Drax will be contacting them very soon.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  5. "Laser beam" by thewiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    WooHoo! Now I can get my own death ray satellite!
    World conquest, here I come!

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:"Laser beam" by lpangelrob · · Score: 5, Funny

      No kidding... the coverage is great, but the ping time is a drag. I went for St. Louis once but toasted some outhouse across the river because of the lag. Biggest waste of my $10M ever. I'd give the seller an F-.

    2. Re:"Laser beam" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not a 40kg chunk of metal? Or at least 30 kg plus 10kg worth of basic targeting hardware and a release catch. Something you could "accidentally" drop through the atmosphere. By the time it reaches the ground (a.k.a. target) it would be a nice molten drop of metal. I don't have any idea how large it would be by that time, but it would at leat leave a crater, no? Sure, you'd have to target something like a continent (and probably even miss that), but that's the fun of it! "Oops, I dropped something! Let's watch the news to see where it lands."

    3. Re:"Laser beam" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Bastard! I've had some great times in that part of East St Louis!

    4. Re:"Laser beam" by c0dedude · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, I loved it! A++++++++ Would Launch Again!!!!!

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
  6. I, for one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new linux-based things overhead.

  7. How do they get to space? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's amazing what they can do with SoC's these days, isn't it? The only part I don't understand is, how are they expecting that these sats going to fly? AFAIK, NASA stopped flying PongSats on the Space Shuttle after the Challenger incident. (aka, "The Get Away Special") Are they planning to pool these sats together to pay for a booster? Or do you have to get your own? Where is that $10 million going? (For the cost of a couple of these, I could buy a Delta II and send 100-200 desktop towers into space! And that would be assuming I used Car Batteries to power them!)

    1. Re:How do they get to space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They go as secondary payloads with larger satellites. 3 or 4 of them can be positioned under a much larger satellite. When SpaceX and SpaceDev get their own smaller rockets going, collections of these could be primary payloads. The microsatellite bus they give you does primary satellite functionality for you and you can have your own mission control from any place with an internet connection.

      If you are familiar with one of their other satellites, ChipSat, it used TCPIP for connectivity. I believe it was the first. This should be the first satellite to use USB, but the picosatellites may have beaten it.

    2. Re:How do they get to space? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Well, I had to go check, but the GAS program (along with the Shuttle Small Payloads Project) is offically gone, though they did not close up shop until 2004. The last mission flown under the SSPP, a Hitchhiker, was lost on Discovery.

      If you want cheap space access, you still might be able to get it at the followon porgram, managed out of the Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia.

      http://www.wff.nasa.gov/efpo/index.html

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  8. 3 Words by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Funny

    Orbiting brain lasers.

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    1. Re:3 Words by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, four words and a slogan. Orbital Mind Control Lasers: We know what's on your mind, we put it there!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:3 Words by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny
      Nah. With mind control, you can get a big chunk of money from a few people with generally evil motives. With targetted advertising, you can get a big chunk of money from a LOT of people with generally evil motives.

      All you need are three lasers---one red, one green, one blue---and a moderately precise tracking system. Pick a sufficiently refractive layer transition in the atmosphere (or a cloud or whatever) and use it as what would amount to a giant projection screen. Now, you can advertise Coca-Cola in fifty-mile-tall letters that are clearly visible simultaneously from anywhere in the continental United States!

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:3 Words by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 0

      The first time I saw that, I laughed. The second time a year later, when someone emailed me a link, I laughed because I understood everything he was saying.

      --
      "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    4. Re:3 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather the kind that can scratch my ass from space.

  9. Only 10 Million? by Anti_Climax · · Score: 3, Funny

    And just in time for X-Mas too!

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    1. Re:Only 10 Million? by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      I can't wait until the boxing day sale for even lower price.

    2. Re:Only 10 Million? by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      It'll be in the clearence bin the day after x-mas, no question about it.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  10. What i want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what kind of a name is SkuttleMonkey

  11. Problem is downlink by everphilski · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even on an oblique overhead pass, in low earth orbit maximum time in view is about 7 minutes. The article doesn't mention using a satellite relay network but of course... such things cost extra :)

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:Problem is downlink by sonicattack · · Score: 2, Funny

      [...] satellite relay network [...]

      CONFIG_BLUETOOTH=y

      And launch a lot of them.

    2. Re:Problem is downlink by dreadknought · · Score: 1

      Or, as an alternative, you could just launch it into geosynchronous orbit and have an infinite amount of time in view...

      --
      What you reap is what you sow
    3. Re:Problem is downlink by rmstar · · Score: 1

      make a beowulf cluster of these, and your problem is close to solved.

    4. Re:Problem is downlink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just what we need... BitTorrent in space! We can force the RIAA and MPAA to collectively send a fleet of lawyers into space, where they will be devoured by the GLESM (Giant Lawyer Eating Spaghetti Monster). Oh yes. We need to start a collection!

    5. Re:Problem is downlink by websaber · · Score: 1

      Yeah until you lose root. How do you boot into single user mode in space?

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    6. Re:Problem is downlink by TheGavster · · Score: 4, Funny

      It involves Bruce Willis and modified space shuttles.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    7. Re:Problem is downlink by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      Can be a bit longer than that actually, depending on the orbital inclination. The satellite I work on is in LEO and we see pass times (AOS to LOS) of up to about 12 1/2 minutes.

    8. Re:Problem is downlink by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      People have done a lot of thinking about this, and one of the slicker solutions I've seen (and played with) is the Pacsat Broadcast Protocol suite.

      The general idea was that a single downlink could serve all ground stations in the footprint, and that the data were of general interest. So it broadcast data for anybody who wanted it. Exactly what it chose to broadcast was based on requests from ground stations. The downlink protocol also allowed ground stations to piece files together from multiple passes, particularly important when your downlink bit rate is only 1200 bps.

      You could have a completely passive ground station that received data broadcast as a result of other stations' requests. This works well for general stuff like bulletins and things.

      ...laura

    9. Re:Problem is downlink by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Forget the spaghetti monster. Just sending the lawyers into space is a good start. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:Problem is downlink by daddymac · · Score: 1
      Console redirection to COM1 (well, COM1 in BIOS, ttyS0 once booted). I don't see why you couldn't rig up some kind of serial / RF converter.



      Of course, the downside is someone could change your password if the satellite flew over their house :)

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    11. Re:Problem is downlink by hdh · · Score: 1

      I think that joke is funny ever single time.

      --
      I like toast!
  12. Micro-orbit satellite by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately, because of its diminutive size, this satellite can only be put into orbit around a large city at best. For true Earth orbit, you need to spend real money.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Micro-orbit satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Even the smallest satellite can be in the highest of orbits. Haven't you heard, size doesn't matter (at least in physics).

      Their last satellite, ChipSat, had one or two receiving stations, on both hemispheres I believe. Google ChipSat for more info. This system resembles it.

  13. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think that the picosats are cool, but there is not a ton that you can do in such a small package. A small transponder, some radiation experiments, no reasonable optics will fit in that tight a package, and even if they did you would need to accomodate stabilizing gear.
    That said, they are great for universities, where the resulting knowledge gained is the goal and the useful science is almost gravy.

    As to the /.ing, I think the sat would have no problem, due to the rather low speed of the anticipated link (no dish, just a whip antenna, so BW will bw lower). Whether the page will be viewable with a million geeks trying to share a 10kbps link, I dunno.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  14. P2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for the first P2P provider to send their network into space.

    eDonkey 2001: A Space Odyssey

    1. Re:P2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is really intresting can sue something like (audiogalaxy, napster) if it's operating in space? If you can, when by which country laws?

  15. Wimax...and i will become the next iridium by tommyleebyron · · Score: 1

    seriously... immagine a cluster of satellites with wimax technology like the new panamsat..

    1. Re:Wimax...and i will become the next iridium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea! Imagine a beowolf cluster of those!

  16. multiple payloads, SpaceX falcon/OS Pegasus by everphilski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    multiple primary payloads...SpaceX Falcon I and Orbital Sciences Pegasus.

    (from the f*cking article)

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:multiple payloads, SpaceX falcon/OS Pegasus by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Okay, I just reread the article and I think I get it now. The "Microsat" terminology had me thinking that this was for experiments and educational missions. I'm still not entirely clear on its use, but it seems that it's targetted at people with large budgets for space access. So one might send it up along with a Comsat, or send a bunch of these up *as* Comsats.

  17. You're all thinking it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slap a web server on it and you've got "POOOORRN FROOOOOM SPAAAAAAAAAAACE!"

    1. Re:You're all thinking it... by HangingChad · · Score: 1
      Do not mock the power of my fully operational P0rN Star!!

      I find your lack of faith disturbing, Commander.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    2. Re:You're all thinking it... by rbochan · · Score: 1

      But from that altitude, no upskirts :o/

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    3. Re:You're all thinking it... by Cervantes · · Score: 1
      Slap a web server on it and you've got "POOOORRN FROOOOOM SPAAAAAAAAAAACE!"

      No no no. What we're all thinking is: Porn from space... where the girls get a big gizmo in their little hooha and all they can do is scream KHHHHHHAAAAAAANNNNNNNN!!!!!!

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  18. Of what use is it? by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 1

    Obviously this isn't a normal geek toy, mostly because of the price tag, but what sort of nifty things could someone do with a satelite like this? I imagine that it's mainly geared toward University researchers, but that's just wild conjecture.

    Also, why is it so special that the satelite runs linux?

    --

    What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    1. Re:Of what use is it? by varmittang · · Score: 1

      Its special because it runs Linux.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    2. Re:Of what use is it? by parseexception · · Score: 2, Funny

      personal mp3 server beyond the grasp of the RIAA?

      --
      Yeah, I saw a yard gnome once, it didn't scare me - Space Ghost
    3. Re:Of what use is it? by fatcatman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, why is it so special that the satelite runs linux?

      You must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot! It doesn't matter what it is, or why it runs Linux, so long as it does. Kitchen appliances? Check. Stuffed animals? Check. Dead flies? We're all over it.

    4. Re:Of what use is it? by cli_rules! · · Score: 1

      Also, why is it so special that the satelite runs linux?

      A: BSOD.

    5. Re:Of what use is it? by mikeee · · Score: 1

      You're not a shaman until you've installed Linux on your zombie badger.

    6. Re:Of what use is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, why is it so special that the satelite runs linux?

      Because a monkey trained to press Ctrl+Alt+Del would take too much of the payload?

    7. Re:Of what use is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should anyone want to install a bird on a bear... sounds wierd to me...

    8. Re:Of what use is it? by gerardlt · · Score: 1
      Ok, here goes my karma:

      Dead flies? We're all over it.

      Don't ever travel to Russia pal: In soviet russia, dead flies are all over you!

      --
      /* This sig is disabled. Press CTRL-W to enable. Thankyou */
    9. Re:Of what use is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, ten million dollars, and we don't get Windows XP? What, no applications useful to a small space satellite to run on Windows? Must run Linux, so we open source guys can create our own, just for the projects we put on the thing? Guess so.

  19. utilizes such things as plug and play USB by spamfiltre · · Score: 5, Funny

    With a long enough cable, I could recharge my iPod Shuffle from orbit.

    1. Re:utilizes such things as plug and play USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every additional $5million, they will send the peripheral of your choice to attach to your microsatellite via USB plug and play. Obviously, one of the first things you're going to want to attach is an enhanced wireless transmitter for a mouse and keyboard.

    2. Re:utilizes such things as plug and play USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a long enough cable im sure you can recharge it from home

    3. Re:utilizes such things as plug and play USB by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      I feel they're missing a major marketing angle on this one:

      FREE SPACE ELEVATOR WITH EVERY PURCHASE!!

      I mean, how can it go wrong?

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    4. Re:utilizes such things as plug and play USB by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Technically, no - you would need a power booster every 3 feet or so! eep!

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  20. A neat idea... by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But what would/could you do with it? I'd be very reluctant to upgrade the kernel or any such thing that would likely be required to install modules/drivers required to do something neat. Nothing would quite suck like having a 'kernel panic' on a $10,000,000 sitting up in orbit... not as if you can press reset to restart it.

    1. Re:A neat idea... by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Satellites and other space hardware tends to have watchdog reset timers that will auto-reboot to a monitor ROM. That way if anything goes wrong during kernel upgrade, it'll reboot to a known good state.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    2. Re:A neat idea... by grumpyman · · Score: 4, Funny
      In that case, you may want to consider high availability solution with MS Cluster Service on Windows platform with automatic windows-update.

      ** Comes free with IE6 and WinFS Beta

    3. Re:A neat idea... by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      If I was going to put a computer up in space I'd have a special BIOS on there that allowed remote console and file transfers independant of the OS. If I can think of that, I'm pretty sure a bunch of people capable of actually putting it into orbit would think of it too.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    4. Re:A neat idea... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      It's not that dangerous with proper setup. I do the same with boxes 2500 miles from myself without shedding a bead of sweat. The trick is to use 2 root partitions, upgrade the spare one, try to boot it using the grub --once option, if it fails, power off and it will revert back the old working partition. The only trick is toggling the power in the event of a panic, we control power via a network power switch, but I'm pretty sure this could be a added to the uplink interface BIOS, kind of like a two-way wake-on-lan.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    5. Re:A neat idea... by phaggood · · Score: 1

      Worse.

      ssh mysat.wayinspace.com
      connected.
      #wget lastweekslog .
      %^#$@
      ERROR
      d00d, y00r sat is 0wned! Bwahahahahaha!



      "Damn, my sat's been rootkitted!"

    6. Re:A neat idea... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Ideally it would have a failsafe, either as a bootable OS in ROM or as some kind of special firmware, to allow a disk image to be written to the HD (or whatever you use in such conditions) remotely.

      Or something.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    7. Re:A neat idea... by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Lights Out Management? It would be pretty important for this sucker. You might even need a LOM for your LOM.

      --
      No Sigs!
    8. Re:A neat idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, this article fits to "Your rights online:" section. You can do many things with a server out in space, all stuff which is illegal on the earth, P2P, google library (that's not a fact yet, but probably it will be illegal), all kinds of porno, and so on...
      The only problem with this is what use would it have if everyone will block that IP on earth :)

    9. Re:A neat idea... by thesnarky1 · · Score: 1

      You musta tried to play a Sony CD... tsk tsk

  21. The mandatory question by Katia22 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Thats all very good, but will it run linux?. Umm, nevermind :)

  22. Believe me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what kind of a name is SkuttleMonkey ... you do NOT want to know!

  23. Great!! by jkind · · Score: 3, Funny

    With Satellite, I can then research Composites or Fiber-Optics!!
    http://www.civfanatics.com/civ4/techtree/

    --
    ~jennifer.k~
    1. Re:Great!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And fusion!

  24. Ultimate Goals by xaosflux · · Score: 1

    It does not have to just be l337 becuase it's got nix on it, make it be your uplink to the newest versin of IP, the Interplanetary Protocol [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_inter net%5D

    1. Re:Ultimate Goals by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Ha! Excellent idea.

  25. Re:Umm by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    No, you got it wrong! If it's a space thing, AND it runs linux, what you must ask is:

    Is it penguin-shaped?

  26. WOW by heatdeath · · Score: 1

    This sounds almost as revolutionary as sun's grid-computing-for-hire scheme!

    --
    I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
  27. HooDEHoo!!!! by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    Now we can being the slashdotting of space! We can put some radio equipment on it, and start bouncing posts off of it!

    And when we get trolls, they can suck vacuum!

    --LWM

  28. Re:Umm by Katia22 · · Score: 1

    Lol, ill keep that in mind

  29. I see a potential filesharing haven.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Imagine... Linux-based filesharing peers (each with gigs of cached bootleg material) floating kilometers overhead, far beyond the reach of the entertainment industry!

  30. Yes... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    But can it direct an EMP onto the country of your choice?

    //call me Plissken.

  31. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by drsquare · · Score: 1

    Who would pay $500 for a 0.2$ stake in a tiny satellite?

  32. This article needs more marketing buzz! by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

    For a mere $10 million, SpaceDev is offering a state of the art Linux-based microsatellite that can be controlled over the internet using any laptop or desktop computer. The Modular Microsat Bus utilizes such things as plug and play USB, Ethernet, and other standards insert more buzzwords here , while providing critical features such as power, maneuvering, and communication for you boring, boring, boring - emphasize the fun you can have with it - spying on foreign countries, planning world domination, keeping an eye on that cute neigh^H^H^H^H^H^H . Up to 40 kg of project space are at your disposal!!!!

    1. Re:This article needs more marketing buzz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus the added bonus of no MS backdoors for NSA to take it over and use it against you. Mind you you'll probably need to not run American CPU's as the mainstream ones no doubt have deeply embedded "Peek-a-boo" firmware.

  33. Open Source public Sat?! by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok guys and gals, is there anything we can do at Slashdot to pool togeather some money and have one built? I'm willing to donate up to $100. I would love to see everyone donate money to have a Slashdot Sat put into space along with the names of those who contribute. Also, I would love to have access to the Sat for shits and grins.

    What can it be used for? does it matter? The fact I can access a Sat that can later be upgraded with software totally turns me on!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Open Source public Sat?! by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Inter-galactic gateway to our Internet for the curious aliens?

    2. Re:Open Source public Sat?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if a satellite running Linux turns you on I think you have some big issues. :P

    3. Re:Open Source public Sat?! by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I would love to see everyone donate money to have a Slashdot Sat put into space along with the names of those who contribute.

      As long as my usage isn't modd'ed "Flamebait", "Troll", or "Overrated" and subsequently canceled because someone with mod points doesn't agree with the reasons for my usage.

      --
      Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
    4. Re:Open Source public Sat?! by TechnologyX · · Score: 0

      It would be impossible to raise money through Slashdot to buy the sat, and even if you did, it would never make it off the ground. Every time something came up in regards to launching, or fuel, or whatnot, the community would bitch at each other, insult each others mom's, threaten to move to Windows/Linux/Mac, post great suggestions that never get used via AC, and eventually move on to the next issue to repeat the whole process.

      --
      Slashdot sucks
    5. Re:Open Source public Sat?! by tumbleweedsi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well assuming that this puppy has a life span of 10 years (my research on the net suggested sats last anywhere from 5-15) then your $100 dollars contribution would only buy you about 8 hours and 40 minutes at the helm of the slashsat.

      That is assuming that everyone does not try to log on in the first few seconds and we then spend 10 years looking at 500 errors while we save up for enough money to send someone up to reboot it.

      --
      Be nice, sponsor me: http://jailbreak.ragabonds.org.uk
    6. Re:Open Source public Sat?! by (Ohm)+c152pilot · · Score: 1

      Very good idea, I would donate some cash. I think we need a website dedicated to the cause, maybe even get some sponsors.

    7. Re:Open Source public Sat?! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      That sucks. On the bright side however, if we slashdot the "SlashSat", it will burn bright in a ball of fire as it come crashing down to earth in a blaze of glory. =)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:Open Source public Sat?! by madshot · · Score: 1

      Right up until the hard drive dies and you call for an onsite tech to replace it.. ;-)

      --
      Obama = Socialism.
  34. For an extra $1 million, it keeps sending a signal by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case you crash this satellite into the sun or it goes hurdling off into the nearest black hole, for the meager price of an additional $1 million, an uniterrupted signal will be beamed to your laptop for the duration of its expected lifespan. No more worrying about alien sabotage or space junk punching holes in your precious device, we have got it covered.
    This way, you will never know that it has been destroyed, and you can still show off your $10 million toy to your jealous friends.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  35. Plug and play USB ? by c_fel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder who's gonna plug something in the satellite once launched in space...

    --
    I hate all sigs, mine included.
    1. Re:Plug and play USB ? by yfkar · · Score: 1

      The astronauts can plug their webcam in and chat while spacewalking.

  36. Global dominion by Fistacious · · Score: 2, Funny

    'What are we going to do tonight, Brain?' 'Same thing we do every night, Pinky.'

  37. Oooh....I can't wait to do this... by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    bash-2.05a$ ls -al /dev/usb/satellite0
    crw-------    1 root     satellite       3,   0 Nov 07  2005 /dev/satellite

    bash-2.05a$ file /dev/usb/satellite0
    /dev/usb/satellite0: character special SpaceDev MMB-100 microsat

    bash-2.05a$ mount /dev/usb/satellite0 /mnt/launch_vehicle

    bash-2.05a$ mv /mnt/launch_vehicle /space/orbit

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  38. Cheap space tourism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only have to lose 27kg, and I could have the place to myself!

  39. Sats and the DCMA by Katia22 · · Score: 1, Funny

    If we had to build one of these, get a really powerful wireless connection (something that would transmit from space) and hosted MP3's on it...no one would be able to bring it down...or maybe Bush could use this as an excuse to resurect the star wars program, this time funded by sony and all the other record companies, instead of the tax payers money, it might just get off the ground. Who said that mp3's wouldnt make the world a better place?

  40. Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    % telnet mud.mysat.org
    Welcome to the MUD set up in outer space (literally!)...

  41. Re:Microsoft's reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates will buy a few just to prove that Linux will eventually crash too!

  42. Ummmm... Cluster by CaptainBJones · · Score: 1

    Funny this should come up on slashdot... Just a week or two ago I had been looking at getting a pikosatellite kit (till I found out they cost ~ $6000) but in true slashdot fashion.. I thought.. Wouldnt it be cool to have a Beuwolf Cluster of these suckers in orbit...

    1. Re:Ummmm... Cluster by servicemaster · · Score: 1

      Care to share a link or two?

  43. metric system conversion by witte · · Score: 3, Funny

    40 kg ? How much is that in frikken lasers ?
    Now all I need is a USB-compatible shark brain to pilot it...

    2. Threaten to blow up planet (10 times)
    3. Profit !

  44. Burial Space In Space More Easily Attained by theREALbillder · · Score: 0

    In Sagans book Contact he postulates it should be possible to get rich selling burial space in space, a YOUR ASHES IN ORBIT kind of thing, which would appeal to many of this time period, and is much more attainable to the mass. Space Burial. That same book also addresses electronic recognition as a weapon, and the delta 9 isomer within cannabinoids. Cool, was Carl. Smart too.

    --
    Light Happens.
  45. Beer by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny
    Luckily they put an OS that is, between more things, Free... who knows how much it would costed if they used there Windows.

    There are too much joke potential with the idea of throwing out to space Windows computers also, but of course, nobody wants that a blue screen turns it into a red meteorite of death.

    1. Re:Beer by alecks · · Score: 1

      "who knows how much it would costed if they used there Windows."

      $10,000,199??

  46. Antitrust by donnyspi · · Score: 1

    I'd better get the IP address and shut mine down before Gary Winston can get to it!

  47. This will allow me to reach my dream of... by sgtboost · · Score: 0

    super villain! http://www.ubergeek.tv/article.php?pid=54 I can hardly wait!

  48. way too small to be comsats by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Comsats are the big birds of the satellite world; they are power hungry and need huge solar arrays and a huge dish pointed with great accuracy at the surface. They also need something else - geosynchronous orbit. They need to be at a static location in the sky where they can point in one direction... These satellites are aimed at the scientific and possibly educational community, although they tend to do well enough leeching off of NASA. (not a rip, an observation, having been there and done that)

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:way too small to be comsats by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Comsats are the big birds of the satellite world; they are power hungry and need huge solar arrays and a huge dish pointed with great accuracy at the surface. They also need something else - geosynchronous orbit.

      I was thinking more along the lines of the Iridium Constellation as opposed to a traditional Comsat. i.e. A network of satellites in LEO, that could move your signal from sat to sat as they pass overhead.

      Iridium wasn't all that bad of an idea, but it was a bit ahead of its time in Satellite technology.

  49. wait for it, in 3 .. 2... by mcdade · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowolf cluster of these!!

    just had to add it.

  50. Obligatory by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    Just imagine a Beowu-- oh, nevermind.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  51. Mwahahaha by skidz7 · · Score: 1

    Finally I can create a satellite with a giant "laser" and hold the world ransom for......ONE MILLION DOLLARS!

    1. Re:Mwahahaha by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 0

      ONE Million dollars is not that much anymore.
      Rather ask for TWO million dollars!!
      mhuuwhaahaaha
      That will only leave you with an 8 million loss.

      --
      "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    2. Re:Mwahahaha by skidz7 · · Score: 1

      Okay then. We hold the world ransom for.....One hundred..BILLION DOLLARS!!

  52. Death from above by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    Great! If you could just bolt this 40kg ball of high-temp stainless steel to your comm/maneuvering package, we should be all set. Just let me know the sequence for deorbit; I'll take care of the targetting myself.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  53. You don't by everphilski · · Score: 1

    You generally wouldn't upgrade the kernel on flight hardware unless there was a known bug that cropped up after launch. What you might want to upgrade after the fact is your flight code, and if that does go wrong there generally are watchdogs that detect a bad upload and flash from a known good firmware.

    -everphilski-

  54. Re: Alternative by cli_rules! · · Score: 1

    I'm holding out for the heavyweight, high cost Monolithic Microsoft Macrosat.

  55. A whole new meaning to 'network collision' by absinthminded64 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Instead of seeing a blinking LED we'll see explosions in the sky! I can't wait for geeks to start slinging their own satellites up!

    1. Re:A whole new meaning to 'network collision' by ZeroZen · · Score: 1

      On that note, just how much light can one generate with 80 watts of power? Maybe your entire payload can be a big capacitor and a really good light.

      Every night you can point at the sky with your friends, and press a button on your laptop and watch your satellite light up like polaris.

  56. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    Who would pay $500 for a 0.2$ stake in a tiny satellite?

    I'll give you a dollar if you throw your cell phone as high as you can.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  57. Imagine a bot-net cluster of these babies by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Imagine 0wning a bot-net of death-ray satellites.

    Oh wait, these don't run Wind-bloze. Nevermind.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  58. Why stop there by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    if someone participating in the project could get access to a coupla pounds of Pu to keep the penguin warm, they could probably build a Linux probe to Kuiper Belt, and beyond!

    Satellites are totally played out.

  59. Plug'n'play space elevator... by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Modular Microsat Bus utilizes such things as plug and play USB, Ethernet, and other standards

    Does the USB cable double as a space elevator when not in use?

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  60. Re:The perfect Christmas gift for an evil scientis by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 0

    Am I the only person here that knows what he's talking about? Ratchet and Clank folks! >_>

    --
    It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
  61. Call me when... by ylikone · · Score: 1

    ...they are offering the $10 million^H^H^H^H^H^H^H version.

    --
    Meh.
  62. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, the hams have been busy lately... see www.amsat.org for a look at what they've been up to lately. And speaking of webservers, PACSAT PBBS protocol is pretty much your garden variety BBS. Retro, but effective. You can hear FM Voice satellites like AO-51 on a garden variety Radio Shack scanner.

  63. Let me guess by ajdowntown · · Score: 0

    For $10 million, is the USB cable included? Or do I need to spend an extra $25 for the cable?

  64. USB Ports? by phatmonkey · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it can power my handy USB noodle strainer in space!

  65. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 0

    Ahem... I'm waiting for my dollar.
    I'm gonna go look for a new phone in the meantime.

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  66. Havenco returns? by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Havenco could figure out a way to operate on one (or more) of these, at least until the US Star Wars program deploys a working orbital laser weapon to knock it out (and at least then, we'd know!).

  67. 16 nodes... 160M - Start the Collection! by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

    Could you imagine a Beowulf cluster.... IN SPACE!

    --
    Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  68. Funny... by kurbchekt · · Score: 0

    I had actually started a project like this not too long ago. It consisted of 12 Mini-ITX boxes running NetBSD in a beowulf cluster with Pringle-can omni-directional wi-fi antennae launched with a giant slingshot. I called it SkyNet and it cost approximately 549 US dollars. Basically, it was designed to allow Microsoft track everyone who rejected authentication during Windows Update.

    (insert diabolical laugh)

    Seriously, 10 mil? Do they have layaway?

  69. I'd like less than one. by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    This doesn't scale very well.

    $10M for 40kg? Now if I could get a 4g
    payload under my control for $10k, or
    a 400mg payload for $1k, I might
    get excited.

    1. Re:I'd like less than one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Check your pants -- I think you'll find your 4g "payload".

  70. Re:The perfect Christmas gift for an evil scientis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should mr. Drax be interested... he got a spaceship factory.
    ...I do belive we are talking about the same mr. Drax... from Drax Industries in Moonraker ?

  71. Brilliant! by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 0

    I've always thought that having root access on a satellite would be a path to geek nirvana. I mean - it's space, it's exotic - wow. The other job I think that would be great would be something involving computers that run nuclear facilities.

    --


    Believe with me, my saplings.
  72. Re: Death From Above 1979 by mpathetiq · · Score: 1

    DFA1979 ROCKS! Thanks for reminding me. I shall listen to them now.

  73. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by salad_fingers · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a member of a team building a pico satellite at the University of California. The actual price for our entire project hovers around $50,000, of which 40k go to launch costs. This is the price tag for a Russian launch, I am sure the US would charge quite a bit more. The problem with these pico satellites is actually integrating a full fledged OS onto OTS parts. Data memory and program memory are in limited supply, along the lines of KB. We are using an Atmel CPU and are running AVR library from the http://www.avrfreaks.net/ website. The actual module we are writing is for the CPU scheduler. The interupt handler, bus protocols, etc are already written. Running this minimal amount of code is beneficial and doesnt overload the small amount of data memory we can utilize, so basically you can run less than a full on OS like linux and still get away with it.

    "What imaging can you do for cheap -- what resolution, what wavelengths?"

    The imaging comes down to the type of camera and it's power consumption. Image processing really loads the CPU and draws a lot of power, so compression algorithms are important. JPEG does the job fine, but is limited to around 320x res (in color) given our power constraints. The camera we are using is a CMOS imager, which works through the charging of capacitors relative to the intensity of incoming light. The wavelength of operation ultimately comes down to the FCC. They allocate you a bandwidth to use, most likely 2m or 440MHz. Other functions the satellite may serve is as a HAMsat, or a HAM radio repeater in space. You can tune you radio to the sat freq, and hit any place that the satellite covers with your signal. The preferred mode of operation is digital, so sat comm utilizes packet radio, which loosely resembles the TCP/IP stack. As far as a webserver goes, Im sure you could do it, but it would be limited to the length of one satellite path. Guess thats enough time for a 30 second pr0n clip...

  74. dont everybody click this at once by dlippolt · · Score: 3, Funny

    but damn is it funny, every time i watch it.

    http://www.starterupsteve.com/swf/switchlinux3.htm l

    especially funny, in the context of this topic

  75. Yes,, but will it.... by crazyvas · · Score: 1

    Yes, but will it run lin.....wait a sec, will linux run it? I'm all confused here.

  76. Umm? by u16084 · · Score: 0

    Ok, so now what? What kind of payload would one select? Being a "Micro" ... coverage? - Relay? What do *I* need my own sat for? (seriously confused) (Not FLAMEBAIT just curious) Dont we have enough junk floating around in orbit already?

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  77. Feh... by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

    If you can't play F.E.A.R. on it... I'm not interested in it.

    --
    MadOgre.com
  78. From-the-Ben-Franklin-dept. by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this trumps our Linux enabled kite business model?

    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
  79. World's most expensive counter-strike server by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    With 3000ms+ ping times and $10m, it's the most expensive and the worse counter-strike server ever. But I bet the server would still be fully loaded if it was limited to only playing de_dust.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  80. 40kilos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey that means I can finally blast my little brother into space...he weighs less than 40kilo!!!1

  81. of course the first one will be by routerguy666 · · Score: 1

    ...yet another web server.

  82. Required by xquark · · Score: 1

    I for one would like to welcome our new orbiting overlords!

    Arash

    --
    Arash Partow's Philosophy: Be a person who knows what they don't know, and not a person who doesn't know.
  83. What about legal? by Terrasque · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What laws will this satelite be bound to?

    Lets for example say someone put up a webserver and put some seriously illegal stuff on it (childporn? nasty comments about george bush?).. Who gets to shoot it down?

    --
    It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    1. Re:What about legal? by tumbleweedsi · · Score: 0

      Who gets to shoot it down?

      Whoever has a gun big enough and the inclination.

      --
      Be nice, sponsor me: http://jailbreak.ragabonds.org.uk
  84. Ooooo yeah. by s-twig · · Score: 0

    I want some frickin' lasers on mine.

  85. Great idea for a datahaven by RobinH · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea for a datahaven. It would cost way more than $10 million to shoot it down, and it would be accessible from anywhere on almost 50% of the surface of the Earth, which would make it hard for a gov't to cut off access to it. If you stick it in geosynch just over the eastern Indian Ocean, you could call it SatelliteFreeChina(.int:).

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  86. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1
    $50k? No way! I found , linked from the CubeSatKit site, listing $200k, so I figured I might be 'way off base in my estimate.

    When's launch time?

  87. Microsat? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    That much money and 40kg payload are hardly microsats in my book. A while ago there was an article on REALLY small satellites, 5kg or less costing $10,000 to be placed in low earth orbit.

    I'd rather have a smaller satellite shot further high so it lasts years longer.

    Is it possible to have your satellite bolted onto the ISS for a monthly fee? The ISS is frequently pushed back into orbit, so it doesnt fall down.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  88. The lag on Quake by madshot · · Score: 1

    Oh man.. just imagine the lag you'd get on a $10 million computer.. I think I'll have to pass on this one...

    --
    Obama = Socialism.
  89. So THAT'S what the U is for by ReadParse · · Score: 1

    Ah, suddenly Universal Serial Bus makes sense.

    I think this is friggin' great. When you have a new device you want to plug into the USB port, you just... uh...

    RP

  90. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by salad_fingers · · Score: 1

    As a stabilizing mechanism you can use magnetorquers. They are inductive coils implanted into the side panels of the satellite. The navigation system detects rotation and fires off the coils when neccessary to counteract the magnetic field of the earth and slow down the rotation long enough to take a picture. It is quite an intelligent solution as it takes up no internal payload space.

  91. Stratellites are cheaper ... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    http://www.21stcenturyairships.com/AirshipFAQ

    You can also land them via remote control, and fix anything that goes wrong with a
    one man crew in a farmer's field if u wanted to .

    NASA's altitude record for a ballon stands at 171,000 ft I believe .

    In the Stratosphere there is no wind, so the balloon being blown around is not an issue .

    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  92. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    When you are as space constrained as the pico sats, I have a feeling that anything would be a space hit. These sound interesting though, and are likely the only viable solution in this case.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  93. Ummm, WAY overpriced by lommer · · Score: 1

    Considering that a 1-week stay on the ISS is $20 million, what would you rather have? A semi-useless sattelite that you can play with or a personal trip to outer space for just twice the price?

  94. public library in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you could cram enough books in there and maybe put this on a polar orbit, you could have a public library people could download books from for anybody with recieving capability.

    Think about it... it's a great end-run around China's Great Firewall. People in opressive regimes could read about forbidden subjects without the state knowing easily. Use a highly directional antenna for the ground station and stash it in a shed.

  95. RE: no dish, whip antenna by jedi_gras · · Score: 1

    Forget that whip! What I really want to see is a pico satellite and a pringles can strapped on to it.

    I'm sure that could bring down the costs a little bit :)

  96. Re:The perfect Christmas gift for an evil scientis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you watch the ending ? He lost all his spaceships.

  97. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by hobbit · · Score: 1


    If $10 million can buy you 40kg of cocaine, $250k will not buy you 1kg, for much the same reason.

    --
    "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  98. debugging would be tough.... by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

    Apart from the obvious "how do you press the on/off/reset button" and "how do you remove CD 1 and insert CD 2"....

    How the heck can you read a logfile with all those timezone changes?

    1. Re:debugging would be tough.... by Hina+Matsuri · · Score: 1

      I'm no rocket scientist, but I would guess it would be time from the launch. "T minus three, two, one... blastoff!" And then events happen at like, T four days six hours or whatever.

  99. BPS by Hina+Matsuri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know a lot of people here *hate* anime and anyone who likes it, but...

    Has anyone seen Battle Programmer Shirase? There was an episode where this super retardedly awesome programmer (Shirase, the main character) hacks three neglected satellites and crashes them in a line to target a boat. The first in line acted as a primary heat shield for the second two and evaporated pretty quick, the second did the same for the last, and the last plowed right into the boat in a big explosion.

  100. Re:$10 million and 40kg? Why not $250k and 1kg? by Xyrus · · Score: 1

    I think we could do quite a bit with a pico.

    First thing that popped into my head was fitting these things with small lenses (or a good short FL Zeiss lens) and cheap CCD astroimagers.

    1. Wide to Telephoto CPU based camera lens (18-70mm).
    2. Electronic shutter for lens system protection.
    2. Cheap CCD astroimager (think Meade or something).
    3. Micro gyro. (for orientation)
    4. Micro board with embedded OS and controllers. (Flash drive for storage).
    5. Low power transciever.
    6. Small array of solar cells for power.
    7. Small rechargeable Li+ batteries for power storage.

    The computer board controlls the camera lens. The CCD is fixed in place.

    Most of the housing would be comprised out of a aluminum (heat disspation) and durable thermo-plastic. The solar cells would charge the batteries and power the main system.

    Focusing would be handled by algorthims on board.

    The CCD imager would most likely be in the 640x480 size range. A 12-bit raw compressed losslessly would give around 690 KB. At 10 Kb/s and a 7 minute window, you could get about 1 image per pass. With HQ JPEG compression, images would probably be 70 KB, so each pass would give you ten images.

    Sure 70mm isn't a lot of aperature, but couple this with no visual obstructions (atmosphere), no vibrational problems (wind, ground vibration), and having five of these things at different points around the planet, you've got a pretty good astroscope. It isn't the hubble, but it's not bad for 1/10000 the cost.

    ~X~

    --
    ~X~
  101. probe assembly line by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

    To me I think the ultimate would be to have private space probes that could go beyond the earth and the moon. Imagine hundreds of misc. probes going out in every different direction, some to Mars, some to Venus, some to the Asteroid belt. I don't think something like that could be privatized, but I think it would be a good idea to create a kind of VW Bug, a standard platform, for space probes. Maybe you could upgrade the computer core as the technology evolves, but standardize on the rest of it, the propulsion, the solar panels, the antennae. Once you can standardize the platform you can make a bunch of them and just launch them constantly. If one breaks down, the next one will take its place. Of course, the problem then becomes one of maintaining the deep space network so you don't have more communications to do with probes than you have available time on earth. That's where you might be able to set up a relay network so that the chain of probes act more as one unit.

  102. Better keep an eye out for James Bond by Drfruitloop · · Score: 1

    Then I will photograph air force bases and rule the world. Muhahahahahahahahahahaha.

    --
    A man chooses, a slave obeys - Andrew Ryan.
  103. Deathmatch by Too+Slow · · Score: 1

    LAN Gamers can now really destroy things in space. . .