Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Sensor Networks for Killing Mosquitoes

aaditeshwar writes "It looks like sensor networks have some applications afterall, other than the usual stuff for defense and US military! AmBio has created a wireless mesh network of bugspraying "magnets" that report back data on the temperature, air conditions, and wind directions, and a central controller uses this data to turn ON or OFF the magnets in different areas. They plan to cover entire cities with such wireless meshes, and create an anti-mosquito shield around the city!"

143 comments

  1. And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When the bacteria eaten by the mosquitoes begin hurting us, everybody will realize that -after all- they were not just "bad".

    Typical biological intervention which reverts against us.

    1. Re:And then by quigonn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dear Mr. Crackpot AC,

      Please have a look at some encyclopedia and get a clue. Mosquitos are typically nectar feeders, with only the females sucking out your blood. And they infamous for transmitting illnesses such as Malaria in some countries.

      Regards,
      [unreadable signature]

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    2. Re:And then by Indras · · Score: 5, Informative

      When the bacteria eaten by the mosquitoes begin hurting us, everybody will realize that -after all- they were not just "bad".

      Typical biological intervention which reverts against us.


      Mosquitoes do not eat bacteria. They are nectar drinkers, with the female ones requiring an additional diet of animal blood.

      I'm racking my brain, but I cannot think of a negative reason to remove mosquitoes from cities. Other than reducing spread of West Nile virus and malaria, the only real effect would be a lack of bug bites and a reduced diet for spiders and birds that feed on them.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    3. Re:And then by muskel · · Score: 1

      sounds like a nice idea: why not change the natural environment of western civilisation by pumping all kinds of exhaustions into the air, then add a random mass of radio waves and spice in all with massive magnetic pollution? test this, and if we see a flaw in this plan - say in 20 years - it will aready be too late to bother. nature took billions of years to shape our world. but we are way better. ps: I was told that sarcasm is hard to recognize, when written. I thought, I should mention it here.

      --
      muskel http://www.oudeis.org/maps/pure%20and%20simple.htm l {1, 4, all} AND {all, 4, 1}
    4. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But since in our lifetime, we do build up a bit of a resistance to mosquitos, wouldn't this be like the over-use of sterilization? If kids grow out not getting mosquito bites, then as soon as they leave a city and start getting bitten, they'll have no resistance and be swollen little blood drained extremely itchy kid-things?

    5. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying you develop immunity to mosquito bites is like saying that if I keep shooting you in the head, you'll eventually become immune to being shot in the head.

      Mosquito bites are a physical injury, not an infection or toxin.

    6. Re:And then by temcat · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm racking my brain, but I cannot think of a negative reason to remove mosquitoes from cities.

      Frogs eat moskitos. You leave frogs without food. Won't anybody please think of the frogs?

    7. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The physical injury you get from a mosquito bite is a teeny tiny little pinprick of a puncture wound. The bit that actually annoys is the body's reaction to the chemicals in the mosquito's saliva, which causes the redness, the swelling, the itching. This is something which your body does adapt to the more you're exposed to it. Native people in mosquito-ridden parts have greatly reduced reactions to mosquito bites than hapless foreigners.

    8. Re:And then by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      some do!

    9. Re:And then by inf0rmer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm recovering from Dengue Fever, and I can think of nothing better than sending them into oblivion.

    10. Re:And then by moro_666 · · Score: 1
      indeed, only female mosquitos suck (yeah i mean that literally and not literally).

      but he has a point, if the mosquitos disappear, there will be nectar left overs that they balanced over the years. now if a more harmful species will come to eat that nectar and gain some tremendous overpower with it, we might be in big trouble which could be not even comparable to our current "ouch that damn thing bite me" problems.

      try to look at the big picture, there are millions of mosquitos all over place and they probably are here for a good reason.

      and as for the optimists who hope to see this invention avoiding malaria in africa, if you look at the financial point of view, bsd will really die before and be confirmed totally dead by netcraft before africa is saved. too many towns, too many people, too many mosquitos.

      // next thing in the news is a nuclear rice cooking machine that will save africa from starving ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    11. Re:And then by ta+ma+de · · Score: 1
      Well, then we need more wi-fi enabled frogs to eat mosquitos; preferably frogs that produce that thing called 5-meo-dmt, I understand dogs like it. Or was that lick-it.

      http://www.strangezoo.com/content/item/105766.html .

    12. Re:And then by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      How about predators who live on mosquitos. Malaria and westnile can be killed by just taking away the Tiger (? Only this one, or also some others) mosquito. Other mosquitos might be annoying, but they do not transmit diseases.

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    13. Re:And then by tpgp · · Score: 1
      Mosquitoes do not eat bacteria.

      In their larval form they eat algae
      An algae bloom turns the shallows of a lake into an unpleasant greenish stretch of water. The algae that can make the shores of our lakes repulsive is exactly a mosquito's cup of tea. Not only do they eat algae but they are also a source of food for others in the food chain. Dragonflies, fish and birds eat them.


      So there you go, unfortunately they're a vital part of the ecosystem... (as are my other hated creature, the jellyfish)
      --
      My pics.
    14. Re:And then by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      No, they're not a vital part of the ecosystem, they eat algae.

      One does not necessarily lead to the other.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    15. Re:And then by aztec+rain+god · · Score: 0

      The frogs will just start to eat people then

      --
      Sig cannot be found.
    16. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> One does not necessarily lead to the other.

      the gp also mentioned dragonflies, fish and birds eat them.

    17. Re:And then by brother+bloat · · Score: 1

      As the saying goes, "there are no small changes in a complex system." Removing (or introducing) a species to an area on a scale as described nearly always backfires, resulting in a situation worse than before (think of pigeons and english sparrows in the United States, or cane toads in Australia).

      Removing all mosquitoes from the food chain may have far-reaching effects on other animals as well. At the present time, the system (i.e. nature) is so complex that we cannot possibly hope to predict these consequences in advance (although after the fact they will seem obvious). The notion that we can make these sweeping changes to the Natural Balance of Things without incurring the burden of "side effects" is absurd, given that we have not gained control of all the variables in the system.

      --
      (( (CRAYON) )) >
    18. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're discussing keeping mosquitos out of cities which are not known for their nectar stores compared to, say, forests. Not eradicating them from the planet.

      In this regard, fuck the delicate mosquito balance. LET the mosquitos suck blood and nectar, just not in town.

    19. Re:And then by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

      Point one, mosquitos do not eat bacteria. Second point, mosquitos are very very bad news for third world countries. I see people talking about malaria and how many people it kills, but if you just get malaria you are lucky, in south asia you have much dangerous killers like dengue. If you are really really unllucky you will get brain fever, west nile fever, yellow fever.. the list is endless. It will be great if such webs are put up in slum areas and near water bodies.Kudos to them for bringing out such an invention

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    20. Re:And then by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      if type(mosquito) == parasite:
      slap(AC.face)

      --
      I am Spartacus
    21. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cancer rate in urban areas suddenly quadruples....

      Yes, when the Cancer Fairy comes to punish us for horribly killing mosquitoes in little vacuum traps. Unless we can get cancer from being too near vacuum traps, carbon dioxide, moisture, heat, octenol, and WiFi access points.

      I guess you were going for +1, Funny, but you didn't make it. Maybe you could try again, with more funny.

      If you were serious, I'd sure like to hear your reasoning on this matter. If any.

    22. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many animals depend on mosquitos for food, including many birds, bats, and other insects. Lets remember that this is a food chain, and other links do depend on mosquitos.

      The other thing I will point out is that magnetic mosquito repelents have been around since the 1970's. When they are first installed they work great. Then the slowly sart to loose their effect as generations of the buggers get used to the magnetic fields. Soon (3 years?), they are not bothered by them any longer.

    23. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      native people have reduced reactions because their ANCESTORS have been there for a long time. their reduced reaction is probably not entirely due to habituation to the mosquito saliva but also due to evolutionary adaptations over years. not the same kind of adaptation.

    24. Re:And then by booble · · Score: 1

      Since my career is in mosquito abatement, I can say with assurance that mosquitoes do in fact eat bacteria in their larval state. BTI and Bacillus Sphaericus are 2 widely used bacteria based products which are used in mosquito abatement. One major negative in the total elimiation of mosquitoes from a region would be in plant polination. As nectar feefers, they are a primary source of plant polination. The elimination of mosquitoes from an environment could potentially have far reaching implications. It should be noted that professionally run mosquito abatement programs do not seek the total elimination of a mosquito population. The goal is to reduce numbers sufficient to reduce the risk to human populations from diseases vectored by mosquitoes.

    25. Re:And then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mosquitoes are generally used in nature to curb the human population. When you eliminate mosquitoes, you're creating a population explosion in human beings!
      This can only lead to one thing: human culling. Yes, the future is here...

  2. Can we retrain them to suck up..... by blankoboy · · Score: 1, Funny

    spammers, phishers, Nigerian 419'ers, and their ilk?

  3. Fighting malaria by pieterh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would be great in tropical countries. Mosquito-borne malaria is one of those diseases that affects a huge number of people (a majority in many countries), which is non-fatal but debilitating. It makes you sick every few months, and you spend a week or so in a terrible fever. Sometimes it's fatal but mostly it just makes people very weak, unable to concentrate on useful work, and so on.

    Of course there are hundreds of other diseases that weigh down people living in tropical countries but malaria is one of the big ones. Keeping mosquitos away from places where people live would be a great thing. I just hope the technology will become cheap enough to work in rural Africa.

    1. Re:Fighting malaria by RDW · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's fatal in up to 2.7 million cases a year (mostly African children):

      http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/facts.htm

    2. Re:Fighting malaria by kellar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      at the moment, the best defence against malaria in [south] africa seems to be revisiting DDT.

      --
      k e l l a r
    3. Re:Fighting malaria by moro_666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think there must be better ways to fight malaria.

      from tfa

      "The way to control mosquitoes is to go to these ponds and float a harmless oil," that will suffocate the larvae when they come up for air, he said. "It seems like an awful lot of trouble and expense to do otherwise."

      wtg dudes, seems like they have too much of fresh and not spoiled water over there. from the chemical point of view, there are as many harmless oils as there are nature friendly suv's. and you are forgetting the fact that in the very same lakes are breeding places for other breeds that save our butt from lots of trouble through eating other insects and having a competitive race for the food with really nasty insects ?

      i think they will figure out this much later.

      Can't people really create some kind of protection against malaria ? Here we are sitting behind multimillion megahertzed machines chatting over network that has been dragged with cables and satellites all over the world, and we can't find 1 civilized way to fight a diseasy without killing entire other species by it ? Give the medical institutions some proper budget and let them invent a malaria that is harmless to people but that does push out the malaria that we have right now, this should work, no ?

      and does malaria have some kind of balancing effect on the rest of the mammals ? like regulating the count of animals so the planet wouldn't be overpopulated there by them and eaten "clean" ? no reason to stab ourselves in the back because it looked like a good idea in the first place.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    4. Re:Fighting malaria by aztec+rain+god · · Score: 0

      Can't people really create some kind of protection against malaria ?
      The problem is that malaria is a virus, and drug companies have a hard time making money off of developing vaccinations for 3rd world diseases. The only counterexample I know of is GlaxoSmithKline, which was about to axe their malaria vaccine program until whoever the head was told their chief he would seek outside grants and donations to fund the program. Enter the Gates foundation.
      It amazes me how little attention malaria gets relative to other diseases. I think of that ebola outbreak in Angola earlier this year that had everyone freaking out maximally, and it killed like 300 people. What nobody realizes is that every year, malaria kills about 10000 people in Angola alone. Just a little thanksgiving perspective

      --
      Sig cannot be found.
    5. Re:Fighting malaria by bdijkstra · · Score: 1

      Not in the long term. Like anti-biotics, DDT is in principal a Bad Thing(TM), because it helps the evolution of unwanted creatures.

    6. Re:Fighting malaria by dmatos · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that drinking lots of gin and tonic won't work? Oh well. I'll keep drinking anyway, just in case you are wrong.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    7. Re:Fighting malaria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Malaria is not a virus, it is caused by parasites.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaria

    8. Re:Fighting malaria by mungojelly · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, you have to be very careful in fighting diseases like malaria. The populations of countries where malaria is endemic are relatively tolerant of it; their continual exposure to it makes them sick but also gives them enough immunity that they are much less likely to die. Therefore the worst of all worlds is to keep people from getting malaria for a year or two, and then slip up; with many people having lost some of their immunity, the new wave will be much more lethal. (Note: I'm no expert on infectious diseases. My source for this information is The Coming Plague by Laurie Garrett, an excellent book that I read earlier this year.)

      IOW, actually dealing with malaria will involve sustained committment & fundamental infrastructure improvements. Attempted magic bullets could even be worse than nothing.

      <3

      --
      If you were my sig, you'd be reading yourself right now.
    9. Re:Fighting malaria by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      quinine will kill bacteria in infected still water, and it does taste a lot more palateable with a bit of gin mixed in...

    10. Re:Fighting malaria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...and we can't find 1 civilized way to fight a diseasy without killing entire other species by it ? Give the medical institutions some proper budget and let them invent a malaria that is harmless to people but that does push out the malaria that we have right now, this should work, no ?
      If it's harmless, it may not spread fast enough to sustain the parasite population. Maybe nonfatal for humans makes it more fatal for another animal? Besides, by changing malaria in that way, wouldn't a new species have been created? Now how do you get rid of the harmful species? Make the engineered species capable of killing or out-competing the natural one? Ah, but then our civilized method has ended up killing a species with our own bio-engineered species. Add some points for the possibility of side-effects on the system at large. History's shown how bad we are at predicting complex interactions in ecosystems, why would our mucking with a species DNA be any different?

      It's probably better to just protect people with an innoculation, and since that isn't exactly forthcoming, in the meantime systems can be setup to control the carrier population (in this case mosquitos). So now just a specific area can be targeted and if a complication arises, it can easily be stopped. It's quite a bit tougher to stop a bio-engineered (or even non-native) species from spreading, once introduced outside the lab.

      like regulating the count of animals so the planet wouldn't be overpopulated there by them and eaten "clean" ?
      Umm...yeah. And while we're at that, we should stop treating the diseases afflicting humanity. It should be pretty easy to make a sound case for reducing the world's human population. I suspect you wouldn't get far with that though...probably easier to just start a war (but make sure it's not widespread enough to kill off an entire species' habitat!).
  4. Can the 3rd World afford it? by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a great application, and one which probably has the largest benefits for the 3rd World and developing world. As with drugs however the issue is going to be the cost to those countries of deploying it (and having the reliable power network to support it).

    How long before its cheap enough to not just be about making people in Florida feel more comfortable living in a swamp?

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Can the 3rd World afford it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the big cities, mosquitos are (mostly) just a nuissance. You know, bug bites are itchy. Occasionally there's malaria and west nile virus, but it's not as wide spread as 3rd world countries.

      Luckily, there are cheaper and more effective alternatives in 3rd world countries in fighting mosquitos (which is nearly equal to fighting malaria) that are probably much more effective than using magnets and sensors. Basic things like using mosquito repellant with readily available natural ingredients, or some as simple as dumping styrofoam beads into the toilet hole to stop the larvae from reaching the surface, etc. etc.

      However, what came to mind immediately was, which mosquitos do these magnets effect? Are they effective for all mosquitos? And are ONLY mosquitos effected? For example, certain mosquitos get confused when a certain high frequency sound is emitted. Other mosquitos don't give a darn. So such a sound-emitting device is useless unless you have a very specific mosquito species problem.

      One interesting thing I learned of bug spray was that the mosquitos don't necessarily dislike the spray. That's not the way they're repelled. Rather, mosquitos use heat sensors, scent, and something else I forgot, and if you can mask one of them (for example, by using the scent of lemon grass) then you can confuse them enough to not realize there's a target person near by. So the bug spray is a "mask" if you will.

    2. Re:Can the 3rd World afford it? by mikefe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How long before its cheap enough to not just be about making people in Florida feel more comfortable living in a swamp?

      After the patent expires of course.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  5. Whoops by squoozer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought they meant real magnets. I was like "WTF do we have nano-robitic mosquitos now?". Glad we can all sleep safe in the knowledge that we will only be bitten by regular mosquitos.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Whoops by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mosquito sized and even dust particle sized robots have been under development for a number of years now. If natural mosquitoes can bite you and unintentionally spread diseases, think about what robotic mosquitoes can do in the hands of the wrong person.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Whoops by utter_tosser · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our nano-robitic mosquito overlords

    3. Re:Whoops by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they ought to go back to an idea I had years ago. In an early 1970s Scientific American "amateur scientist" column, there was an article on building your own 5Kw pulsed dye laser. I always wondered about taking the sonar range-finder from the old polaroid SX-70 camera, adding some electronics to allow it to discriminate between the target and other objects, and hooking that up to the pulse-laser. Of course, my target was going to be the squirrels eating my garden, but the principle is the same.

      Cue some appropriate music, switch on the anti-mosquito system, and sit back to watch the fireworks. Do make sure the targeting system can tell the difference between you and a mosquito before putting it into production, but that's an implementation detail.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  6. Now I just need a really long extension cord... by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This sounds like it would work great for golf courses and country clubs (one of the sites mentioned in the article).

    However... they tout this as being great for third-world countries where malaria is prevalent. I'm sure this is the angle they'll use to get major media, since people ultimately aren't that drawn to devices that make live even easier for the country-club set.

    According to the article, you need both a 20-pound tank of propane and access to a nearby power outlet to make the machine work, not to mention wifi for the fancier parts of it. Seems like this could be a bit of a stretch in places like Central America and Africa where they're lucky to have running water and decent sanitation facilities. Maybe a better version of device could use the propane to power the unit, so that you don't need that power cord?

    Or else, I suppose they could just use the equivalent of the "Mexican National Extension Cord" to run the things.
    --
    Free 411! 1-800-411-SAVE

    --
    Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
    1. Re:Now I just need a really long extension cord... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Seems like this could be a bit of a stretch in places like Central America and Africa

      Yes, in TFA a doctor says as a public health measure it would be much easier, cheaper and effective to spray the standing water where they breed rather than trying to suck them up later in this device.

  7. Great !! by amodm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As if interference from nearby wireless networks was not enough !! They're using 802.11b network. Do they realize that a 802.11g network gets very badly affected if there's a 11b network nearby ?

    Couldn't it have been done through wires, or bluetooth, or custom radio, or whatever....

    1. Re:Great !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if interference from nearby wireless networks was not enough

      Exactly, but some aware trial lawyer will love the class action suit he's being handed against these radiofrequency illiterates. Those who actually read part 15 of title 47 will note that the use of 802.11b over 2.4 GHz is regulated by the ISM rules, which state that you must:

      1. accept interference from existing sources already there. That's why you're allowed to use this frequency.
      2. cause no interference to the existing sources already there.

      The second item gets many into trouble and has actually led to successful civil litigation. Blindly launching a product on top of frequencies already heavily in use will cause certain interference and as its sold, provides no method for the purchaser to pre-determine if they are going to interfer (this is useful in transferring the liability back to the manufacturer, who is making a product that will knowingly interfer and provides no measure for a user to avoid interference). It is difficult to obtain FCC intervention (read close to impossible) due to the interference under ISM being regarded primarily as a civil matter, except in the cases where there is an intent to interfere, or gross negligence. It may be demonstrated that given the absolute refusal to understand the regulations to which the mosquito magnet makers are permitted to operate a product for national distribution, the gross negligence claim may predicate FCC response.

      Incidentally, if you are intentionally jammed by an interfering party who is not in compliance with ISM, be thankful and explain to your attorney that you may seek punitive damages. We dealt with a new wifi ISP who was furious he couldn't find an open band, so he sat there and ran 4 watt amps on all frequencies to jam the existing services. The 4 watts made him illegal and gave the judge a clear determination of illegal intent and opened up the punitive damages part. As he didn't have the money for the decent judgment, the court seized his equipment, business and company truck. We didn't see a lot financially out of this but it did send a message around here: Look before you leap onto someone's wifi frequency, especially when it is used in commerce. 2.4, 5.2 and 5.8 GHz are not a blind free-for-all.

      Two other notes for those that ever contemplate this:
      1. If the interfering party can be shown to have the technical know-how to run a tool like NetStumbler or Kismet, or even the wireless survey equipment in their radio, this is very valuable as the attorneys explain it makes them a special kind of defendent and raises the difficulty of their defense. It's like a CPA looting the church bank account and claiming ignorance - it's damn near impossible since they know too much about how money works.
      2. Get a very competent large legal firm that has the specialists that understand this stuff, or an absolute brilliant ace who will promise to do so. This isn't easy litigation from what we're told but at the same time, when your defendent hires some dude he found in the yellow pages, he's lost already.

  8. What? by TallMatthew · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "We got the idea from institutions that were jury-rigging our technology to computer networks and mesh networks, with PC panels, to see how many mosquitoes they'd caught or how much propane they had left"

    Jury rigging? Man that epithet has drifted over time. Those institutions slipping greenbacks to your technology to win a verdict? I assume it derived from "gerry-rigging" (as in German-rigging) which turned into the distasteful "nigger-rigging" (though I suspect Germans consider gerry-rigging pretty distasteful themselves) to represent tampering with something in a hardhanded way to get it to do something other than its intention.

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they meant "Jewry Rigging"

      and if it means hanging them from lamp-posts, all the better! :)

  9. And the effects on other species? by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great, we'll rid the city of mosquitos... What about natural predation and balance in areas where these systems are deployed? There are species that depend on the these "pests" for survival?

    http://www.mosquito-netting.com/predators.html

    I know that there are concerns with insect born illness, but that these problems can and in my opinion be solved without wiping out an entire species from an ecosystem, no matter how annoying they are.

    Is it just me, or does this seem a little extreme...?

    --
    Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
    1. Re:And the effects on other species? by Sean-Khan · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm worried about too. In theory, this sounds like a good thing in certain circumstances, but what if everyone wants to make their town or village mosquitoless zone?

      Larger use would certainly have an effect on ecosystem.

    2. Re:And the effects on other species? by ultranova · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Great, we'll rid the city of mosquitos... What about natural predation and balance in areas where these systems are deployed? There are species that depend on the these "pests" for survival?

      If they don't have mosquitos, let them eat flys !

      I know that there are concerns with insect born illness, but that these problems can and in my opinion be solved without wiping out an entire species from an ecosystem, no matter how annoying they are.

      I can think of several species I'd like to have wiped out of the ecosystem. Namely, mosquitos, flu, malaria, plague...

      But if you are so worried about nasty biting insects and horrible diseases being wiped out, then by all means, go and ask to be infected by smallpox, which, after all, is on the verge of extinction.

      Is it just me, or does this seem a little extreme...?

      It is just you. No one else wants mosquitos around.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:And the effects on other species? by cowscows · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that'd be ok. The amount of urban/developed land, compared to the total land mass of the planet, is pretty damn small. Even if we kicked those bugs out of all the cities, there'd still be plenty of other space for the mosquitos and dependent species to survive.

      If this crap works, I vote that New Orleans install some as soon as possible. The mosquitos have always been sort of bad here, and they got a whole lot worse after the hurricanes. All around the city and its suburbs, trucks drive through the streets spraying chemicals into the air to help control the bugs. I can't imagine that that is particularly healthy for anyone, so an alternative would be nice.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    4. Re:And the effects on other species? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Fuck you and your politically correct thoughts.
      Mosquitos are more than an annoyance, they're a fucking plague; and so's anyone who sides with them.
      Go fuck yourself.


      Hey man. Lay off mosquitoes OK. Grandparent is 100% correct. Killing all mosquitoes WILL cause enviornmental problems. Just because you're bitter over having been bitten too many times doesn't make this any less the case.

      Remember. You moved down the the Sunbelt. The mosquitos were there first.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    5. Re:And the effects on other species? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      There are species that depend on the these "pests" for survival?

      There are indeed. For instance, the mosquito is a crucial part of the lifecycle of the plasmodium. If mosquitos are eradicated, then the plasmodium goes with it.

      Now, as far as I'm concerned, plasmodium sits just above HIV on the list of Species That Have Just Got To Go, but YMMV.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    6. Re:And the effects on other species? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, most people want their city to be a completely sterile ecology-free zone. They don't mind if all the birds die out because we killed off all their food, damn things were shitting on their hummer, and do you have any idea how hard it is for some 5'3" man to clean the roof of his hummer? They don't want any 'coons or foxes or deer or whatever the fuck keeps coming around and knocking over their garbage can, either. In fact, they're perfectly happy if the only fuzzy things their kids get to see is on TV. Cats just stink up the place and the damn deposit on dogs is just too much.

    7. Re:And the effects on other species? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It definitely is extreme. More than that, it is pointless and stupid. Pointless because after a short while moskitoes really eat that poison. They adjust very quickly. Stupid because if you kill all sorts of insects, its the nasty ones that spread first and fast.

    8. Re:And the effects on other species? by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1



      You'd have to live near a mosquito-infested area to understand. Imagine a black haze of mosquitoes as far as you can see in every direction. Keeping mosquitoes out of cities will definitely not affect their population outside of the cities in any large way. I'd also suspect that the method of trapping and destroying the mosquito itself is environmentally better than the current method of mosquito prevention (pesticides and surface water oils).

    9. Re:And the effects on other species? by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "Killing all mosquitoes WILL cause enviornmental problems"

      Really? REALLY? How do you know this? How can you say it "will" as though you know this to be true?

      You can't, so stop acting like you know what will happen.

      Seriously, people like you ruin discussions about these things with your arrogance and self importance.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    10. Re:And the effects on other species? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      I think you are overreacting. Mankind has been trying to eradicate all bugs for oh, roughly 2-3 million years and as far as we know, we haven't succeeded in eliminating a single species.

      I'm thinking that this may be a device to win a battle, but the bugs are gonna win the war.

      --
      -Styopa
    11. Re:And the effects on other species? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's you. First, consider the ecosystem you're crying about. Cities. If you think there's an ecosystem in cities that humans can take care not to change, you're neglecting the tiny little technicality that any ecosystem that grows in a city grows entirely according to human activities. There is not some delicate balance of alley cats and feral children to protect in cities, but there are mosquitos that carry disease. To eliminate one species from this completely artificial human-centric ecosystem is trivial, and as long as I don't hear about plans to blanket the Everglades with these devices, I'm not worried. Nobody is talking about making mosquitos extinct, and nobody is even talking about trying to control them anywhere but in cities. Calm down, hug a tree, and see if you can't learn to think things through a little better before inflicting your ignorance on the rest of us.

    12. Re:And the effects on other species? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, moron. Get some fucking education first before you open your asshole. Mosquitos and a lot of other insects which would be wiped out as well (yes, including flies) are at the *bottom* of something called a food chain. You remove the insects from cities, you remove everything else that depends one it. ie. birds.

      Second, you will NOT get rid off all mosquitos anywhere. Instead of 2000 fuckers on your lawn with some dragon flies picking them off, birds, and what not, you'll end up with 500 fuckers on your lawn all alone with you.

      You know what? Living in a city WITH mosquito spraying and in the country WITHOUT it, mosquitos were hell of a lot more annoying in the freaking city. In the country there was so much other crap feeding on the mosquitos that these fuckers had a hard time actually finding people. Well, unless you get in the bushes but then you are asking for it.

    13. Re:And the effects on other species? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Really? REALLY? How do you know this? How can you say it "will" as though you know this to be true?

      Game Theory. Look it up. When competing and cooperating species form part of an ecosystem, the removal or drastic reduction in one species has knock on effects on the rest of the ecosystem.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    14. Re:And the effects on other species? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Hey, moron. Get some fucking education first before you open your asshole.

      Why ? I'm perfectly capable of operating my bowels without any formal instructions. If you aren't, then I feel truly sorry for you; but please work on your problems instead of reflecting them on me.

      Mosquitos and a lot of other insects which would be wiped out as well (yes, including flies) are at the *bottom* of something called a food chain. You remove the insects from cities, you remove everything else that depends one it. ie. birds.

      Actually, it is a food net. The difference is that birds have more to eat than just mosquitos or other bugs; worms, fish and garbage, for example. This, in turn, means that birds can do just fine without mosquitos.

      Second, you will NOT get rid off all mosquitos anywhere. Instead of 2000 fuckers on your lawn with some dragon flies picking them off, birds, and what not, you'll end up with 500 fuckers on your lawn all alone with you.

      So why would the mosquitos be the only ones to survive ? Why wouldn't it be 500 mosquitos and some dragonflies picking them off ?

      You know what? Living in a city WITH mosquito spraying and in the country WITHOUT it, mosquitos were hell of a lot more annoying in the freaking city. In the country there was so much other crap feeding on the mosquitos that these fuckers had a hard time actually finding people. Well, unless you get in the bushes but then you are asking for it.

      This might, of course, be partially caused by the lower density of human population, and the resulting lesser breeding potential for mosquitos. They, after all, need blood to breed, and while there are other suitable blood sources than humans, it is highly unlikely that any could be found in higher concentrations than humans in big cities.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    15. Re:And the effects on other species? by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      And you do not know that the environment will NOT be adversely affected.
      Your post was just as pointless as the one to which you responded. I see no evidence to suggest your position either. And you claim to be right.. he said the balance could be effected, you said it WILL NOT. Back that up please.

      --
      :x
    16. Re:And the effects on other species? by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      He didn't say DIRE consequences. He said it will cause problems.

      If you are too stupid to realize that the removal of a food source for a species could cause problems for a while, then you might as well just kill yourself.

      --
      :x
    17. Re:And the effects on other species? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BEST fucking reply so far. You win the thread!

    18. Re:And the effects on other species? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Unless you believe that mosquitos are able to make conscious decisions in order to better themselves.

      Game Theory doesn't require agents to make conscious decisions. It only requires them to react based on the state of other agents in the system.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    19. Re:And the effects on other species? by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 1
      Well, aside from your rude and obviously hostile demeanor, I think you make one or two valid points...

      First, your right about the "enviro-weenies" shrieking about @&^% like this. I do agree that there are many folks out there who don't know squat about the subject, never had any formal scientific education, and are just jumping on some "just cause" bandwagon to give them something to care about. No doubt, they are annoying and often times take things to an unnessecary extreme; However, I have had quite a few upper-level enviromental science courses in the past, and quite frankly, it's down right scary when you learn what is out there, right on the horizon... Malaria being one of the scariest things facing our planet now and in the near future (disease related). So believe me, I see the other side of the coin on this particular subject.

      This said, I think I'm justified in saying that an unregulated, free market approach to pest control should not prevail in this case, and companies should not be allowed to sell and deploy this system without some serious controls by folks who know what they're doing. Likewise, hunters are not allowed to go out any time they want an bag a buck, dove, duck, etc.... This is for a reason. Think about it. The role the DFG play's here in the states is an important one.

      And your second point:

      Lastly, I wish you assholes would realize nature will balance itself.

      Indeed it will, but let me ask you this? Are we as humnans going to be a part of this balanced "future"? I have children, do you? I care about the future for my children, and my friends children, and their children, etc, etc...

      Remeber, There are many different people out there with many different agenda, so - If you can think about this without throwing out harsh stereotypes, prehaps my post any like it in the future ,will make a little more sense to you.

      All in all, I really dont' appreciete being stereotyped, and I expect more from the /. community than rantings like yours. Quite frankly, I'm really suprised that your post hasn't been modded down as flamebait.

      Good luck, and happy future....

      --
      Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
    20. Re:And the effects on other species? by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 1

      Right, and up until two hundred years ago, mankind was doing so with fire, sticks, stones, magic spells, etc... The world has changed radically in the past 60 years (tech), and I think we are far more effective now that we ever have been at modifying our environment, both for the good, and for the bad.

      --
      Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
  10. Holy Iron Insects, Entomology Man! by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny
    AmBio has created a wireless mesh network of bugspraying "magnets" that report back data on the temperature,

    Maybe I'm missing something, but I didn't know that mosquitos were magnetic. I guess I'll have to welcome my new magnetic insectoid overlords. I'm getting really sick of welcoming new overlord, but whatever.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Holy Iron Insects, Entomology Man! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 0

      Just imagine a Beowulf cluster of magnetic mosquito overlords! In soviet Russia, overlords welcome YOU!

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Holy Iron Insects, Entomology Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm getting really sick of welcoming new overlord, but whatever.

      I for one welcome our new overlord welcoming overlords.

  11. Bats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does this system compare with just attracting bats to the area? Just attach little wooden bat homes near your golf course or whatever. Bats eat a lot of bugs.

    1. Re:Bats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat

      If 1.5 million bats can eat 10,000 to 30,000 pounds of bugs a night, every night, then presumably 150 bats can eat 1 to 3 pounds of bugs a night.

      A pound of bugs is a lot of bugs.

    2. Re:Bats by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Bats eat a lot of bugs.

      So do fish. When I installed a pond in my front garden the mozzie population exploded overnight. The Mosquito lavae were breeding in the pond.

      So I put fish in the pond. The fish got bigger and the mozzies almost disapeared.

    3. Re:Bats by kellar · · Score: 4, Funny
      yeah but then what do we do with the .... aw screw it, i'll just use an obligatory simpsons quote:

      QUIMBY: For decimating our pigeon population, and making Springfield a less oppressive place to while away our worthless lives, I present you with this scented candle.

      Skinner talks to Lisa.

      SKINNER: Well, I was wrong. The lizards are a godsend.

      LISA: But isn't that a bit short-sighted? What happens when we're overrun by lizards?

      SKINNER: No problem. We simply unleash wave after wave of Chinese needle snakes. They'll wipe out the lizards.

      LISA: But aren't the snakes even worse?

      SKINNER: Yes, but we're prepared for that. We've lined up a fabulous type of gorilla that thrives on snake meat.

      LISA: But then we're stuck with gorillas!

      SKINNER: No, that's the beautiful part. When wintertime rolls around, the gorillas simply freeze to death.

      The family head back to the car.

      --
      k e l l a r
  12. And then by Kelz · · Score: 1

    The cancer rate in urban areas suddenly quadruples....

  13. Vapourware? by martinmcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I watched a program about mosqitos recently, and they are actually pretty cool creatures. As mentioned before, it is only the female that drinks blood, and it is used for making babies (mosquito babies I assume, not human), not for everyday sustanance. When they drink your blood, they actually distill it in real time, excreting out what they do not need as they drink.

    But anyway, asides from the possible environmental impact it may or may not cause, does this not strick anyone as being highly unrealistic. How much would it cost to put up a city wide net of sensors and magnets, not to mention the power cost, replacing broken components etc. etc. Smells to me like a lot of vapourware.

    I think we should just all sit down with mosquitos and have a good long chat, I'm sure we could work out our differences and learn to live together in peace and harmony.

    1. Re:Vapourware? by DingerX · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, duh, it is vapourware.

      ... until they perfect the tracking mechanism to determine the precise location of each mosquito, and feed that into an IMDS (integrated mosquito defense system), that uses picolasers to fry those bastards outta the sky.

      Seriously, the world would be a better place without mosquitoes. Those of you in parts of the world where you don't have them, or you don't have many of them, really needn't comment on the environmental damage they['d do. The mosquito population can certainly stand the hit from being denied access to mammals in certain desert areas (known as "cities"). Mosquito though is one of the top vectors for human diseases, and many nasty ones.

      On the other hand, spraying pesticides does come with environmental costs.

      and for me, that "good long chat" would be: "look motherf*, if I ever see you around me, I will kill you, all your spawn, and do my best to exterminate your whole species!"

    2. Re:Vapourware? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      "I think we should just all sit down with mosquitos and have a good long chat, I'm sure we could work out our differences and learn to live together in peace and harmony."

      Yeah... Tell that to the hundreds of thousands who die from malaria in the third world every year...

      These machines do work. That isn't to say that a network of them would be any more useful than using one as a point solution where there's a known problem.

      --
      Deleted
    3. Re:Vapourware? by meringuoid · · Score: 1, Insightful
      As mentioned before, it is only the female that drinks blood, and it is used for making babies (mosquito babies I assume, not human), not for everyday sustanance.

      Great. So the mosquito bites me, gives me malaria, and uses the blood to make MORE MOSQUITOS. Now, if you'd explain to me why this is a good thing?

      That disease kills some 1.5 million people a year. One million, five hundred thousand people a year, every year. That's death on a Holocaust scale, and not just for a few years but year on year with no end in sight.

      Now, maybe there will be unpredictable ecological knock-on effects; food webs are like that. But I'll tell you what, to prevent one point five million deaths a year, if someone offered me the chance to press God's red button marked 'Instantly Exterminate All Mosquitos' I'd do it without the slightest hesitation.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:Vapourware? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      The appropriate solution to your concerns is finishing development of a malaria vaccine. It will be cheaper, more effective and less harmful than trying to wipe out a whole chunk of the food chain.

    5. Re:Vapourware? by martinmcc · · Score: 1

      Great. So the mosquito bites me, gives me malaria, and uses the blood to make MORE MOSQUITOS. Now, if you'd explain to me why this is a good thing? Improvements in the gene pool? Seriously though, you don't need to jump of the agressive defence so much, I just mentioned as an interesting tit-bit, not as an arguement for or against any particular point. That disease kills some 1.5 million people a year. One million, five hundred thousand people a year, every year. That's death on a Holocaust scale, and not just for a few years but year on year with no end in sight. Yeah, thats right people die. People die for reasons. 1.2 million people die each year from car accidents (not including secondary pollution knock-ons). Perhaps a magnetic sheild for cities from cars is the answer to that? Now, maybe there will be unpredictable ecological knock-on effects; food webs are like that. But I'll tell you what, to prevent one point five million deaths a year, if someone offered me the chance to press God's red button marked 'Instantly Exterminate All Mosquitos' I'd do it without the slightest hesitation. Thankfully, your hand isn't on that (imaginary) button. No widescale culling should take place without very careful consideration of the possible knock-on effects.

    6. Re:Vapourware? by martinmcc · · Score: 1

      "I think we should just all sit down with mosquitos and have a good long chat, I'm sure we could work out our differences and learn to live together in peace and harmony."

      "Yeah... Tell that to the hundreds of thousands who die from malaria in the third world every year..."

      Indeed. Get sarcasm much?

    7. Re:Vapourware? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be safer to move your finger a little to the left and press the "Instantly Exterminate All Malaria Parasites" button?

    8. Re:Vapourware? by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      And what about the OTHER diseases that mosquitos spread?

      Right, that's why you leave the commentary to more intelligent, less ignorant people.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    9. Re:Vapourware? by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "widescale culling should take place without very careful consideration of the possible knock-on effects."

      That's idotic. That process only invites ignorant criticism like yours, and allows people with a lot to say, but little of substance to roadblock the process.

      No thanks, I'll let nature sort it out. What makes you think any kind of consideration will come to a correct conclusion anyway? It seems you think people can predict the effects of something like this.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    10. Re:Vapourware? by flyinwhitey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And what about the OTHER disease mosquitos spread?

      Right. Let the adults talk about this for a while.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    11. Re:Vapourware? by martinmcc · · Score: 1

      "
      "widescale culling should take place without very careful consideration of the possible knock-on effects."

      That's idotic. That process only invites ignorant criticism like yours, and allows people with a lot to say, but little of substance to roadblock the process.

      No thanks, I'll let nature sort it out. What makes you think any kind of consideration will come to a correct conclusion anyway? It seems you think people can predict the effects of something like this.
      "

      Your first sentance seems to suggest that you think 'widescale culling without due consideration' should take place (in giving negative connatations to the stopping, or 'road blocking' such a process). Yet your second sentence seems to suggest it shouldn't (let nature take its course).

      For your first sentance, 'road blocking', and 'ignorant crticism' is simply a possible side affect of the process, not the process itself.

      As for being able to predict it, yes people can predict it. Theres no garentee that it will be right, just as there are no garentees for any decision you make in life. You consider as much information as is available to you, try to consider how much information is missing, and take the best risk/reward action based on that. If we didn't do anything becuase we wern't 100% certain of the result, we would still be sitting in caves.

      I find the arguement 'let nature take its course' very niave. Is it nature taken its course if I hunt a dear for food? Is it nature taken its course if I kill a lion to secure my dwelling? Is it nature taking its course if I kill thousands of cows to prevent a desiese from spreading further? We come from nature (unless you are one of these jolly ID ppl) and therefore everything we do is a product of nature. Sitting back and saying 'let nature take its course' is an easy escape route for the lazy, and if I may return a few phrases, ignorant and stupid.

    12. Re:Vapourware? by CMDR+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I also watched a program about mosquitoes the other day called "Monty Python's Flying Circus - Mosquito Hunters", here's an excerpt: "Roy: (voice over) The mosquito's a clever little bastard. You can track him for days and days until you really get to know him like a friend. He knows you're there, and you know he's there. It's a game of wits. You hate him, then you respect him, then you kill him. (Cut to Hank Spire who stands peering toward the horizon. Suddenly he points.) Voice Over: Suddenly Hank spots the mosquito they're after. (Dramatic music. Crash zoom along Hank's eye-line to as big a close-up as we can get of a patch in a perfectly ordinary field. Cut back to Hank and Roy starting to crawl towards some bushes.) Voice Over: Now more than ever, they must rely on the skills they have learnt from a lifetime's hunting. (tense music, as they worm their way forward) Hank gauges the wind. (shot of Hank doing complicated wind gauging biz.) Roy examines the mosquito's spoor. (shot of Roy examining the ground intently) Then ... (Roy fires a bazooka. Hank fires off a machine gun; a series of almighty explosions in the small patch of field; the gunfire stops and the smoke begins to clear) It's a success. The mosquito now is dead. (Hank and Roy approach the scorched and blackened patch in the field) But Roy must make sure. (Roy points machine gun at head of mosquito and fires off another few rounds) Roy: There's nothing more dangerous than a wounded mosquito." So what we need are just a couple of well hardened Aussies called Roy and Hank.

    13. Re:Vapourware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you're not the only one who thinks it's absurd. Mosquitos may be a nuisance, but humans are many times worse.

    14. Re:Vapourware? by philipgar · · Score: 1
      "I think we should just all sit down with mosquitos and have a good long chat, I'm sure we could work out our differences and learn to live together in peace and harmony."

      Yeah... Tell that to the hundreds of thousands who die from malaria in the third world every year...

      Sounds like a great idea. Jimmy Carter did something similar. Met with groups who'd never agree, and some that wouldn't think rationally if their lives depended on it. All in the name of peace. While north korea, israel/palestine, etc may be as unpeaceful as ever, he got a nobel peace prize out of it.

      So I say form a peaceful organization that agrees to stop the current war on mosquitos. Give the larva a chance to grow up, and while you may do nothing to stop the mosquitos, you will have a nobel peace prize at the end of the day. And since when did accomplishing anything real matter.

      Phil
    15. Re:Vapourware? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      And what about the OTHER diseases that mosquitos spread?

      Most of them aren't serious enough to justify the cost of placing millions of mosquito magnets in every inhabited tropical area of the world, connecting them to the AC power grid, and then constantly replenishing their propane tanks. Once again, developing vaccines or treatments would be far more practical and effective.

      Oh, and calm down. You don't need to tack insults on to the end of every post you make in this thread. People might think that you're fucking prick or something.

  14. Not just in tropical countries by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Informative

    Diseases like West Nile Virus kill people every year in non Tropical climates as well.

    1. Re:Not just in tropical countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even without the fatal diseases mosquito bites are annoying. At least here in this non tropical country the mosqitos die out in winter. (it may be -12c outside right now, with a wind chill 10 degrees cooler, but at least theres no mosquitos.

  15. Imagine.... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 0

    imagine a beowulf cluster of....... oh too late, never mind!

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  16. Not all bugs are mozzies by martinX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not all bugs are mozzies. If it kills all bugs, what happens to the critters that live by eating bugs?

    I remember reading (somewhere on the innanet, so it must be true...) that the so-called mozzie zappers weren't too discriminatory. ~95% of the bugs caught in them weren't mosquitoes, but were bugs that had been attracted by the zapper's (deliberately attractant) light. This in turn was adversely affecting the local frogs. Less frogs meant more mosquitoes... and so on.

    OTOH, my fly catching bottle smells like poo but catches nothing but flies :-)

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    1. Re:Not all bugs are mozzies by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      If you had read the article, you'd have seen that the device is not an indiscriminate bug zapper. It has a mosquito-specific attractant.

    2. Re:Not all bugs are mozzies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course i didn't rtfa... i was pissed as a fart when i posted - could barely see the keyboard . now it's morning and i have rtfa, yes i see that the use of CO2 as an attractant will make it more specific. now where's the aspirin?

  17. average joe geek by DJCF · · Score: 1

    Great, what kind of chances does the average Joe geek have for making a house-area one of these out of old HDD magnets? Or something? Sounds like a fun project...

  18. Birds by se2schul · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... and the number of birds who feed on the bugs will be cut dramatically throughout the cities.

  19. Is this needed in cities? by se2schul · · Score: 1

    Most cities don't have a bug problem. Rural areas on the other hand.....

    1. Re:Is this needed in cities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The city of Winnipeg, Manitoba goes to great lengths to kill mosquitoes. They employ insecticide foggers that are quite controversial. Why do they do all this? The consequences of the poisons are seen as less of a risk than the consequences of West Nile virus.

      http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/wnv/

  20. Re:And then(there was light) by codecracker007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and another crackpot comment gets (max)modded insightful

    --
    7-8-9-10-0
  21. Just curious by Safirul.Alredha · · Score: 1
    Simply described, the magnet emits a humanlike scent that includes carbon dioxide and moisture to attract bloodsucking insects. When the bugs flutter past, they're sucked into and suffocated by a vacuumlike device.
    In a long term process, does this could somehow have an effects on human health?
    1. Re:Just curious by jabelar · · Score: 1

      Yep several studies show that a human-like scent is known to cause cancer in humans.

  22. Jury-rig is the original by grimJester · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia explains.

  23. Can I create an "anti-moron shield" with this? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    I'll settle for spraying morons with bug spray, even.

    I would like something to get the gnats out of my room, actually. Maybe it would help if I emptied the garbage (daily)?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  24. Hmmm by debiansid · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't mosquitoes get trapped *inside* the net if its covering an entire city??

  25. Where are the bugs being killed? by spineboy · · Score: 1
    If these "nets" are being put up around cities, then chances are, that the animals that live off the mosquitos won't be present in large numbers. Insect populations are fairly robust, remember when DDT spraying was routinely done over large parts of the wilderness - the mosquitoes are still here.
    The main predators of mosquitoes are fish (larval/egg stage), bats, some various insects and mainly of coarse, the dragonfly!

    This sounds like a fairly safe application, but should always be observed, just in case.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  26. I can just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the headlines in mosquitotown..

    All your base are belong to us

  27. Spoilsports.. by slashmojo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I find it a great way to unwind whenever there are too many bugs buzzing around my place I reach for the badminton racquet and go on a genocidal bug swatting rampage through the house.. its great fun and solves the bug problem for a while.. side effects include getting a good workout and having to buy more lightbulbs..

  28. not really... by braindead_in · · Score: 1

    there are lots of other meaningful uses of mesh networking. http://wifinetnews.com/archives/005910.html look beyond 3G and there are lots of possiblities.

  29. How useful can it be? by X-Phile · · Score: 1

    How bad can the mosquito problem be in larger urban centres? In most larger towns and cities I've been in, there are very few mosquitoes due to the pollution and lack of standing water. If this was rolled this out over the Rural areas, NOW we're getting somewhere, because when I play paintball at the field which is in the middle of butt-fsck nowhere, it takes 100% Deet bug spray to keep the little buggers (heh heh) off of you, and that doesn't last very long.

    My $0.02 CDN

    --
    "Well you're not Fiona Apple, and if you're not Fionna Apple, I don't give a rat's ass."
  30. Couldn't we . . . by unknownideal · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . . just make smaller, nano-mosquitoes to bite the regular mosquitoes and teach them a lesson?

  31. Get the facts... by pla · · Score: 1

    a wireless mesh network of bugspraying "magnets"

    First of all, these don't "spray" bugs, in the pesticide sense.

    They burn propane and mix it with octenol (basically a mosquito pheromone) to very specifically attract breeding (and thus blood-feeding) female mosquitos. No actual pesticides involved.


    So to those who worried about bacteria, birds, frogs, and other bugs - This pretty much ONLY catches and kills female mosquitos (though possibly a few other biting flies). Nothing else would deliberately seek out what "smells" like a human meal surrounded by horny male mosquitos.


    As for this oh-so-high-tech use of computers - It basically reports the status of each "magnet", such as the remaining propane level. It also potentially (from what I've read, I don't think they've implemented this on an automatic basis yet, though it works manually from a remote site) saves on propane by shutting down those nodes not likely to accomplish anything (for example, if you had a ring around a city, the downwind nodes would just waste fuel).

  32. A cheaper version perfect for redneck country... by vuzman · · Score: 0

    The Mosquito Magnets network isn't cheap, and it also poses some demands for technological expertise. The solution is nature's own mosquito magnets. This will work best in redneck country where nature's own mosquito magnets are plentiful.

  33. Why worry? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm not exactly shaking in my britches at this prospect.
    You have one heck of a lot more faith in us humans than I do if you seriously believe we could actually render mosquitoes extinct.

    Not to say that I don't think we could do it, it's just that if we manage to do that, I'm going to guess that we'll be more concerned about the planet we've rendered inhabitable.

    We are very very good at imposing negative impacts on macro fauna and the like, but we are not very good at wiping out the little buggers, whatever form they may come in.

    --
    No Comment.
  34. Interference: Not a problem by uberdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A Mosquito Magnet is a propane powered device that attracts mosquitos by emitting a plume of CO2. The CO2 (and water vapour and scent additives) emulate the breath of warm blooded animals. The mosquitos are lured into the trap and killed.

    The clever idea here is to network a bunch of these mosquito magnets, and a bunch of sensors, together, using wireless networking to remotely monitor propane levels, control burn times, etc. A large area can be protected, and the machines don't have to be on when they won't be needed (rain, high winds, cold, etc), thus extending their resources.

    The networking can be done by whatever method is most handy. 802.11b was probably the "in thing" when they started development.

  35. Not a magnet at all. by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 1

    In case you were wondering, it isn't a magnet at all. Mosquitos are not suddenly made of iron. It is a trap using bait and suction. Just thought I'd save you the time of RTFA.

  36. Aren't there better things by MECC · · Score: 1

    Aren't there better things to do with that bandwidth? Like, oh I don't know, maybe Internet access.

    I was part of a team that deployed about 2500 WAP's across the US for a company, and the biggest problem was other 802.11b devices chattering in the bandwidth. Enough of these things in a city, and sure you'll reduce the number of mosquitoes, but you'll never have any wireless ethernet access in that bandwidth. Remember, these things will probably have to use all the channels, just like any other wide-spread deployment of 802.11b WAPs over an area.

    I hate the bugs as much as anyone else (I've been swarmed and bitten on eyelids and inside ears because everyplace else was covered in deet). But there are better things to do with that bandwidth. And there are other ways to deal with mosquitoes that are probably just as effective.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  37. Have they thought this through? by Scotteh · · Score: 1

    Yes, mosquitoes are a huge nuisance to humans, but what will getting rid of them do to other ecosystems? Spiders, for one, feed on mosquitoes. I hope they've done their homework on this one.

    1. Re:Have they thought this through? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Spiders will die too?

      Wow, sounds like an awesome deal to me.

  38. Sad Really by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    Its public ignorance responsible for the widespread propagation of mosquitoes. Even surrounding a city with some form of mosquito net will not help matters.

    People leaving stagnant water in their yards, whether its a bird bath or old tire sitting in the corner is where mosquitoes breed. The city sewers and various waterways also contribute to the problem.

    I.e. there is little to nothing you can do short of poisoning the environment to get rid of mosquitoes.

    The city would be better of issuing public education programs on how to prevent an infestation of mosquitoes in their own backyard rather then wasting money on those "magnets".

    Its like trying to heat the outdoors with a candle. Yes, in theory it should work, but there is just so much air to heat then what the candle can handle, and with these magnets, they just don't work, period. They may collect a lot of bugs, but there are billions more where they came from.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  39. Realtime distillation by phorm · · Score: 1

    When they drink your blood, they actually distill it in real time, excreting out what they do not need as they drink

    We used to play a game when I was younger. If you were bit by a mosquito in the right place, you could flex your muscles and tense the skin around the mosquitos beak. If you did it right, the mosquito would keep filling until it exploded (although in most cases you just got a bigger nasty itchy mark).

    Seems to be that mosquitos can't exactly extrete out blood as they're taking it in, otherwise they wouldn't blow up when 'stuck'

  40. Stop, Think, Laugh by gone.fishing · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Up here in mosquito infested Minnesota, we will try just about anything to reduce the hordes of the buzzy little buggers that make our life miserable. In untreated areas of the state it is not too uncommon for people to stay inside on nice summer evenings because the mosquitos are horrible. Because I love the outdoors and cherrish my time out of the city, I'd try and do just about anything to deal with the buggers. I fog, I spray, I light those citronella candles and burn those coils, I apply repellent and I'll still get chased inside about twilight!

    This is because Minnesota is the land of 10,000 lakes AND 100,000 swamps, we get enough rain so low spots become puddles. We are prime mosquito breeding territory! What makes life so wonderful for us here is also perfect for mosquitos.

    Those propane burning things work but only in small areas and only in still weather when their exhaust can placidly spread out far enough to attract mosquitos. A gentle breeze will render the machine utterly ineffective. How often is the air still in a summer environment when mosquitos are most active? As the heat of the day disipates, gentle breezes almost always kick in, sometimes becoming not so gentle breezes. I'd put my money on these machines being truly effective perhaps ten percent of the time when you really, really need them (which is only about 10% of the day so, .10 x.10 =.01 or more simply, about one percent of the time!)

    In the daylight, or after dark the mosquitos are pretty dispersed. It is only in the evening hours that they get really bad. These mosquito magnets have been around for a few years, they are expensive and they burn propane which isn't cheap! Now this company wants to build a network of them? Perhaps a network large enough to cover a community? Wouldn't it be cheaper, more effective, and more environmentally friendly to issue everyone bottles of repellent? I like the stuff in the yellow and green can from 3M but 100% DEET works pretty well too.

    In my opinion, this concept of a computer controlled, propane powered mosquitio magnet net is the dream-child of some marketing exec. It is false science of the worst kind, sold as being believable and effective. It is snake-oil being sold by modern day snake oil salesmen!

    All you can do is laugh. P.T. Barnum was right, there is a sucker born every minute.

  41. radio modems by latroM · · Score: 1

    Why not use some 1200 baud simple radio modem operating on some license free band, like 27 MHz CB. It would be much simpler I guess

  42. Like that movie. by charlie763 · · Score: 1

    You all know that the mosquito sprayers will eventually be spraying a pleasant population subduing mist. Remember the ending of that movie I won't mention by name for those who haven't seen it?

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
  43. Use of mosquitoes by vismat · · Score: 1

    Some musquitoes eggs are useful. They enhance the ground in a swamp. Not all, but some.
    Beside that, it is never a good thing to completely eradicate a life form from some places. Allthough in some cases this comes in handy in order to fight deseases.

  44. ...we haven't succeeded in eliminating a single..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We haven't? Damn; and I always thought we had:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extinct_anima ls
    [I am no expert, but this seems incomplete]

    http://www.nature.ca/notebooks/english/enexpg.htm
    [some more]

    Yeah I know, all a bunch of left-wing, anti-american tree-hugging eggheads; they probably just haven't looked hard enough. Just because you can't find any members of a certain species does not necessarily mean it is extinct, right?
    LOL:-)

  45. Re:...we haven't succeeded in eliminating a single by yarbo · · Score: 1

    I think your parent poster was saying that we haven't caused a single insect species to become extinct, despite our best efforts.

  46. I can't wait... by insectivorous · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been involved in mosquito repellant trials, as a test subject.

    Yes, there are people who will donate their blood and time to counting and collecting all thee mosquitoes that bite them in the middle of a bog, with only whatever snake-oil product we're given to defend us. Most of our group is composed of entomologists, though, so we're weird like that.

    So far, we haven't seen any significant results with similar (non-topical) products- we'll be seeing about this one next summer, I suppose.

    I highly doubt, even if this does work, however, it would ever be applied to the 'save the world' purpose of fighting malaria in the third world. Let's be realistic, here. This is a product to keep upper middle class suburbanites in North America from feeling a little itchy and think they're protecting Grandma and Little Billy from getting big bad west Nile virus.

    The only realistic control for malaria in the third world? DDT. That's right. I said it! DDT is cheap. It can be incorporated into nettings and enclosures in the form of a wash, so very minimal amounts need to be released into the environment. It requires practically no technical expertise to install or maintain, and doesn't require inputs to 'run.'

    Now, I'm as leery of chlorinated hydrocarbons as the next granola-crunching hippy, and new, 'clean' (though one has to wonder the environmental impacts of the propane and whatever else goes into producing these things and to make them work) technologies are fine and good, but I can't stand the 'save the world' argument being fed to us here. These will never be in common use in the third world because they'll be comparatively expensive, require technical expertise to install and operate, and require constant fuel imputs. It's not realistic.

    I'd rather get a few mosquito bites than buy this miracle new product, thanks.

    1. Re:I can't wait... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Agreed. As long as you don't go spraying it everywhere, causing runoff and the bad effects, you can use DDT very effectivly. Limited spraying around habitat entrances, impregnated curtains, etc can seriously help control malaria in countries such as those in Africa.

      Countries where mosquitoes aren't an annoyance, countries where hundreds, thousands die from malaria and other mosquito vector borne diseases.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  47. Re:Fighting malaria & POOR PEOPLE ! by newpath4comVersion2 · · Score: 0

    Yeah, you could crank that sucker -mesh- up to ultra high frequency to reduce procreation rates in poor countries. Maybe also the USA even though we are, of course, by far the richest people on th' planet! I have just the power supply for running all those wonderful gadgets too >>> Link found here: http://www.newpath4.com/index.html#SpeedingPastPer petualMotionWithAPerpetualElectricPowerEngine2005 .(I could have written UHF but it was too easy. It makes you soft. Hard is the TICKET, yeah baby.)

  48. lasers? by NynexNinja · · Score: 1

    What about using sensor networks of lasers to destroy insects? A carefully designed system would be mindful of non-insect targets, and could last for many decades without needing repair...