Slashdot Mirror


Behind The Curtain On T-Day

Ant writes "MSN Encarta has Columnist Martha Brockenbrough's article on the myths of this American holiday. From the article: 'A lot of what we know to be true about Thanksgiving really isn't. Determining exactly what did happen is difficult. For starters, we don't even know for certain if the Pilgrims served turkey, although it's a strong possibility.'" Additionally, maotx writes "Contrary to popular belief, turkey does not make you sleepy. While purified tryptophan is a mild sleep-inducing agent, there is not enough in turkey to have a sedative affect. And on top of that, turkey isn't even unusually high in tryptophan compared to other foods, such as beef or soybeans. So for those of us enjoying turkey today, bring on the turkey and have a Happy Thanksgiving!"

205 comments

  1. Turkey is not a sedative by adeydas1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... that's why the beer goes with it.

    1. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by temojen · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was being full that made you tired, as all your energy is busy digesting this huge fatty meal.

    2. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by fcrick · · Score: 1

      While the effect may or may not come from some element of turkey, it definetely makes my drowsy. I eat a turkey sandwich for luch and I definetly feel it, placebo effect or not.

      --
      Your signatures belong to me.
    3. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by karzan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also being full and in the process of digestion causes your body temperature to rise, which makes you sleepy. Studies have been done that show that worker productivity generally falls in the hour or so after lunch and it is thought that this is because of sleepiness from increased body temperature.

    4. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmmmmm beeeeeerrrr - Homer J. Simpson

    5. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by Randall_Jones · · Score: 1

      or because blood that could be going to your brain is being sent to the intestines instead to absorb nutrients.

    6. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking. While the turkey may not chemically make you tired, we've formed such a strong association between turkey and tiredness--either through observation or by being told that there's enough tryptophan in turkey to knock you out--that, at this point, your brain releases the appropriate chemicals to make you tired. It's classical conditioning.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    7. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      While the effect may or may not come from some element of turkey

      By "element of turkey" do you mean Turkonium (Tu), the Turkey atom?

    8. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha. ha. ha.

    9. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Informative
      Culture is the sedative, or "opiate" if you prefer. I covered the TDay mythology in my JE http://slashdot.org/~Philip%20K%20Dickhead/journal /122836
      Most of us associate the holiday with happy Pilgrims and Indians sitting down to a big feast. And that did happen - once.

      The story began in 1614 when a band of English explorers sailed home to England with a ship full of Patuxet Indians bound for slavery. They left behind smallpox which virtually wiped out those who had escaped. By the time the Pilgrims arrived in Massachusetts Bay they found only one living Patuxet Indian, a man named Squanto who had survived slavery in England and knew their language. He taught them to grow corn and to fish, and negotiated a peace treaty between the Pilgrims and the Wampanoag Nation. At the end of their first year, the Pilgrims held a great feast honoring Squanto and the Wampanoags...


      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    10. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by ZoneGray · · Score: 1

      >> it was being full that made you tired

      No, it's your family.

    11. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure about that much. I noticed feeling tired on days when I ate turkey sandwiches for lunch before anyone told me that it made you feel that way. Granted, I noticed this in my 12:45 statistics class, which was pretty dull, but that class was only two days a week, and I didn't have the problem the other 3 days of the week.

    12. Re:Turkey is not a sedative by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      That's the observation bit. Your brain got used to getting tired when eating turkey, so now it makes you tired when you eat turkey.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
  2. The first broken myth... by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 4, Funny

    The first myth about Thanksgiving is that it occurs in November. Everyone knows that the real Thanksgiving happens in October.

    --
    "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    1. Re:The first broken myth... by toddbu · · Score: 2, Informative
      The first myth about Thanksgiving is that it occurs in November. Everyone knows that the real Thanksgiving happens in October.

      And that the Fourth of July is really on the 1st.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    2. Re:The first broken myth... by DeadVulcan · · Score: 1

      While, as a Canadian, I agree with you, it should be noted, in all fairness to our cousins to the south, that the Canadian Thanksgiving used to be in November also, but it was moved to October when November 11th was established as Remembrance Day.

      --
      Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
      Power in the hands of the accountable.
    3. Re:The first broken myth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the idea was that Canadians typically had an earlier harvest than Americans.

    4. Re:The first broken myth... by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The first Canadian Thanksgiving was celebrated on April 15, 1872 in thanks for the recovery of the future King Edward VII from a serious illness. The next Thanksgiving didn't occur until 1879 when it was celebrated on a Thursday in November.

      As for it being celebrated in October, it has more to do with Canada having a shorter growing season and that celebrating the harvest makes more sense near the end of harvest season in october. The holiday did bounce around a lot, but I don't think that Armistice day was the sole reason for the move to october.

      http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/jfa-ha/action _e.cfm

    5. Re:The first broken myth... by DeadVulcan · · Score: 1

      ...I don't think that Armistice day was the sole reason for the move to october.

      I stand corrected. Well, that's how it was explained to me, but obviously, it was not so simplistic. Old holidays seldom are. :-)

      --
      Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
      Power in the hands of the accountable.
    6. Re:The first broken myth... by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

      Actually no, the Declaration of Independence was ratified on July 2nd. It took a full day to write it out neatly, then signed on July 4th by some few members who were there, the rest signed it over the course of several years.

      --
      The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    7. Re:The first broken myth... by toddbu · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the joke. July 1 is Canada Day, the closest thing that Canada has to our 4th of July. Much in the same way that Canadian Thanksgiving is in October rather than November.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    8. Re:The first broken myth... by Trails · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's some Molson-ad-esque comment to be made here, but I can't be bothered to sort it out...

    9. Re:The first broken myth... by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

      Yep, right over my head. Thanks.

      --
      The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  3. This story really effects my views on turkey! by JackAtCepstral · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "While purified tryptophan is a mild sleep-inducing agent, there is not enough in turkey to have a sedative affect" Well, the author must have eaten something to make him forget the differences between "effect" and "affect!"

    --
    Cepstral: Quality TTS for OS X, Linux, Windows
    1. Re:This story really effects my views on turkey! by woolio · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the author IS a turkey!

    2. Re:This story really effects my views on turkey! by maotx · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the author doesn't care and does it on purpose!?

      What would be the affect of that?

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    3. Re:This story really effects my views on turkey! by temojen · · Score: 1

      I don't know... my turkeys always affect sedateness on the table. Never seen one moving around in the oven.

  4. The Pilgrims should have served steak by toddbu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've gotten to the point where I can't stand turkey any more. You cook a huge bird and eat it for the next month, then do it all again for Christmas. This year I'm staging a revolt and eating steak.

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    1. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Us Canucks are lucky that way - nicely spread out for us. Either way, my family does roast for Christmas. A nice marinated eye-of-round stuffed with bacon and spices.

    2. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by toddbu · · Score: 2, Funny
      stuffed with bacon

      Would that be Canadian bacon, or American?

      Us Canucks are lucky that way - nicely spread out for us

      Well, I'm glad that it's good for you, because it totally screws those of us who are US and married to Canadians. Not only do I have to eat Turkey for a third time in October, but then I have to listen to all that drivel about how Canadian beer and cigarettes are so much better than those in the US, when it's obvious that the reverse is true. I think that all the cold up there has a big impact on your ability to think, like when you get a Slurpee brain freeze. I mean, really, who in their right mind can't tell that a Krispy Kreme donut is so much better than one from Tim Horton's? :-)

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    3. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Would that be Canadian bacon, or American?

      In Canada it's not called "Canadian bacon", it's just called "bacon".

      Canadian beer and cigarettes are so much better than those in the US, when it's obvious that the reverse is true.

      You got facts to back up this claim? For the beer anyway?

      I mean, really, who in their right mind can't tell that a Krispy Kreme donut is so much better than one from Tim Horton's? :-)

      Krispy Kreme made a hasty retreat back to the US when no one was eating them anymore. Though, I would probably attribute that to them not having the blueberry filling donut available here in Canada. Damn, that's the only good flavour they have.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    4. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [...]how Canadian beer and cigarettes are so much better than those in the US, when it's obvious that the reverse is true.


      Wow... you so lose. This isn't a matter of opinion. You're trying to argue with basic facts.

      Having never had a Krispy Kreme donut, I can't argue with you on that point, but to show that I'm not just consumed by national bias, I do assert that Tim Horton's coffee is absolute garbage. (I assume they must put crack in their milk, or something. I drink my coffee black (since I like the taste of real coffee), and I somehow seem to avoid the strange belief that Timmy's is good.)
    5. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      i am with ya on that idea...

      i have a smoker loaded with hickory and apple wood with country style ribs :)

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    6. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      I do assert that Tim Horton's coffee is absolute garbage.

      Heretic!

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    7. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agreee about the Krispy Kreme, and wouldn't know anything about the cigarettes (there's Canadian cigarettes!?), but the beer is much MUCH better north of the border.

      Common, no one who had tried a few Canadian beers (Moosehead/Keeths in the east, Grasshopper in the West, Anything by Brick in Ontario) could ever go back to that camel-piss Bud or Coors.

    8. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, you're supposed to have people over to help eat the turkey... : p

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    9. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gad, both american and Canadian beer suck. Real beer doesn't need to be artificially carbonated.

      If you piss in a bottle after a hard night of Guiness thats what Molson and labatt both sell

    10. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Jardine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Canada it's not called "Canadian bacon", it's just called "bacon".

      Uh, no. Canadian bacon is called back bacon in Canada. Bacon by itself is the same as what Americans call bacon.

    11. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Funny
      What you refer to as Canadian bacon looks like ham to me or it might be called back bacon. Bacon is the same here as it is there.

      What you Americans call regular beer would be called "light" beer here. Regular beer in Canada has a much higher alcohol content.

      I cannot comment on cigarettes since I don't smoke but Krispy Kremes are just sugar and lard. Where is the bloody flour? I'm guessing that you guys don't dunk your donuts in coffee.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    12. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim Horton's coffee is garbage?!?

      Report for Canadian Culture Re-education immediately, citizen!

    13. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Funny

      US beer is better than Canadian? Wow, why don't you Canucks drink water instead? I mean, come on! If it is worse than the "beer" that is sold in USA, it's reason enough for a revolution. What Americans call beer, I call chemical water, tasting like shit. People should be executed for calling that concoction beer!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    14. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then I have to listen to all that drivel about how Canadian beer and cigarettes are so much better than those in the US

      Canadian cigarettes must be better. After all, look at how much they cost. :)

    15. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by toddbu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but in US dollars they're like 50 cents a pack.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    16. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by azipsun · · Score: 1

      If you are sick of turkey, then have goose for Christmas. Goose is at least as traditional as turkey for Christmas and is far tastier.

    17. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cook a huge bird and eat it for the next month, then do it all again for Christmas.

      Why don't you cook a smaller bird then?

      Another option would be to not cook the full bird, but buy pieces (a couple of legs, wings, breasts) and cook those.

      The third choice would be to move up here to Canada where we have Thanksgiving in October. That way you can spread the eating of the large bird over two months before Christmas hits.

    18. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      US and Canadian beer aside, all pales in comparison to the ales of the UK!

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    19. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      What Americans call beer, I call chemical water, tasting like shit. People should be executed for calling that concoction beer!

      America's a big place. We have cheap crappy beer, cheap not-crappy beer, and expenisve very-good beer.

      Really, though, beer is all just a chemical water that tastes terrible. It just happens to be the most cost-effective and time-expensive way to imbible alcohol, which mnakes for a good fodder for those who prefer to drink for an extended period.

    20. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Chemicals in beer? Not other than natural ones, found in water, barley, hops, malt and yeast. However, what the majority of Americans manage to swallow is as far away from beer as I'm from the moon! Budweiser? ROFLMAO! Miller? LOLOLOLOL The only brand (mass produced that is) that can be called beer is Samuel Adams.

      The situation is ofcourse quite different when it comes to micro-breweries et al, but then again, Joe Sixpack can't even pronounce microbrewery, not to mention visiting one and trying to have a beer rather than whatever-it-is-they-put-on-bottles-and-call-beer he normally drink and call beer.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    21. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The situation is ofcourse quite different when it comes to micro-breweries et al, but then again, Joe Sixpack can't even pronounce microbrewery, not to mention visiting one and trying to have a beer rather than whatever-it-is-they-put-on-bottles-and-call-beer he normally drink and call beer.

      "microbreweries" are, by and large, no better than mass-produced beer. If you don't care for the thin beer that Budweiser et al produce (and many don't), there are darker beers produced by slightly smaller breweries, including Sam Adams but also Saranac, JW Dundee's brews from Genesee, Yengling, and more than a few others. All avaliable in the grocery stores in my area, along with a modest selection of imports and others I didn't mention.

      Joe Sixpack, a mythological figure who's about as real as the "silent majority" voter, has a wide selection of domestic and foreign beer right where he buys eggs and milk. America has some very, very good beer--and it's a sign of ignorance to think that even half of the brands are the same as the as-cheap-as-can-be beer we were so famous for.

    22. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I mean, really, who in their right mind can't tell that a Krispy Kreme donut is so much better than one from Tim Horton's? :-)

      I've never had a "Tim Horton's" donut, but I got $50 that I like them better than Krispy Kreme. It doesn't take much effort to do so...

      Krispy Kreme donuts are the worst donuts I've ever had. I think they are in league with KFC, taking the excess chicken fat that KFC doesn't use (not a lot, I know), and shaping them into circles to serve.

    23. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't expect to win an argument with facts. When someone uses terms like "Joe Sixpack" and "Sheeple", they are almost exclusively morons who assume that they are superior to everyone else and will resist facts like the plague. They live so deep in their dark little existence that the light of truth hurts their eyes. It is tempting to try and reason with them by pointing out how wrong they are, but the best you can hope for is to be called a nazi, thus invoking Godwin's law.

    24. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do make small birds you know.

      Hey slashdot, how about making your security words a bit more LEGIBLE. Idiots.

    25. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I don't do Turkey for both. Might I suggest a fine Christmas Ham instead?

    26. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, try something other than Lager.
      check out a site like Ale Street News, Beer Advocate or Mid-Atlantic Brewing News.

    27. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Canada is a big place too. I prefer microbreweries like Lighthouse Brewing Company or Okanagan Springs. The latter produce a beer with no preservatives or pasteurization in keeping with the Bavarian Purity Law of 1516. They just use Water, Barely, Hops and Yeast.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    28. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find Michelob's Amber Bock to be a decent-good beer. It was the only American beer I could drink upon my return from Germany.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    29. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, it's stronger that California's 10.8% abv Stone Old Guardian? No wonder you people can't speak English properly.

      If you think Canadian beer like Molson or Labatt's is anything more than fizzy yellow moose piss, you're out of your mind.

    30. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "microbreweries" are, by and large, no better than mass-produced beer.

      This is so incredibly false - American micro- and craft breweries produce some of the greatest beers in the wor. And none of the breweries you mentioned are microbreweries, anyway, let alone the fact that Yuengling, Matt's (makers of Saranac), and High Falls (what was known as Genesee until a few years ago) all make crappy macro-style lager, not craft beers. You would know this if you were a true beer drinker, which you've already admitted to not being.

      In conclusion, Beer Advocate has everything you need to know. American beer is not crap, the only people who think that are people who've never tried anything more exotic than MGD.

    31. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try a Fin de Monde or something else from Quebec's Unibroue.

    32. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      What you Americans call regular beer would be called "light" beer here. Regular beer in Canada has a much higher alcohol content.

      This part is false. American beer (and alcohol in general) is sold as percent alcohol by weight (ABW) whereas Canadian beer (and almost everywhere else) is sold as percent alcohol by volume (ABV). They're actually quite comparable when you convert from one to another. A 5% ABV beer is roughly 4% ABW. The actual amount of alcohol in a beer is pretty much the same.

      What you do find is many American breweries use more rice (eg. Budweiser) as a filler instead of barley, so it makes the beer less robust tasting to someone who is used to a more malty beverage. This tends to make them less appealing to some people.

      By the time you get to a Sam Adams or the like, that pretty much goes away.


      I cannot comment on cigarettes since I don't smoke but Krispy Kremes are just sugar and lard. Where is the bloody flour? I'm guessing that you guys don't dunk your donuts in coffee.

      I gotta agree. A Krispy Kreme is so nauseatingly sweet that I've never gotten past the first bite. Donnuts want to be like cake, not like they've been polymerized. I'll take a Tim Horton's plain cake donut over anything from Krispy Kreme.

      As to the cigarettes, Canadian tobacco seems 'smoother' to me, whereas American tobacco has some harsher flavours, seem less tightly rolled/less finely chopped, and with some more bitter elements. I guess that's a matter of preference. I don't know if the process is really that different, or if just the cut/blending are a little different.

      Camel's, for example, have more Turkish tobacco in them. (Which could be a method of processing or a statement of origin.)
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    33. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If you piss in a bottle after a hard night of Guiness thats what Molson and labatt both sell


      If you live in N. America, then your Guiness is brewed in Canada anyway. Personally I prefer a Stone Imperial Russian Stout, or perhaps a Brooklyn Black Chocolate Stout (the gf's fave).

      Cheers!

    34. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Krispy Kremes are just sugar and lard

      Patently untrue. They aren't very healthy, but they don't have lard.

    35. Re:The Pilgrims should have served steak by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Your right, they don't have animal fat shortening but rather vegetable oil shortening as one of the main ingredients. Same diff nutritionally speaking and only matters if you happen to be a vegetarian.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  5. Tell me... by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What do the North American Indians celebrate?

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spanksgiving

    2. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do the North American Indians celebrate?

      The fact that the White man haven't made them extinct and that they still have a bit of unusable land for themselves.

    3. Re:Tell me... by TouchyFeely · · Score: 0

      True.. and Cortez/Pizarro weren't quite so "generous" in Mexico and South America

    4. Re:Tell me... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      True.. and Cortez/Pizarro weren't quite so "generous" in Mexico and South America

      Over there, the Natives are thankful for Spanish Flu anti-bodies.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    5. Re:Tell me... by oxi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Good point.

      Native people I know don't "celebrate" this country's history as is encompassed in the myth of "Thanksgiving" or it's twin, Columbus Day. They instead mourn for those whose lives were taken so long ago. The story as has been told in school rooms for decades is fallacy that doesn't hold water. It glosses over the horrors that people of the First Nations were subjected to in the Americas. By just focusing on Tisquantum (or Squanto) you get a glipse of what hundreds of thousands of more people would eventually be subjected to. A good television series that goes in depth on what the Wampanoag Nation experianced is "500 Nations", available on DVD at the usual places.

      It would great if the geek brethren that assembled here on /. would take it upon themselves to dig beyond the official history and into reality's sad truths with as much zeal as we use in picking apart the latest FUD coming from the Micro$oft.

      More on Tisquantum:
      http://members.aol.com/calebj/squanto.html

      And here's a more personal account of how one Native person spends the day with her family:
      http://www.purewatergazette.net/nativeamericanthan ksgiving.htm

    6. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because europeans were so far advanced in technology doesn't mean we, the descendants, should feel in the least bit guilty. stop trolling bitch. they can celebrate thanksgiving if they want, just like people in louisiana(yeh not everyone in america is a descendant from UK immigrants) can celebrate the 4th of july and chinese immigrants can celebrate new years on january 1. cultures take over other cultures, people take over lands once inhabited by other peoples. it's natural, it happens. and don't go generalising and saying "what about the rapes, massacres" etc. people are assholes no matter the time or place but you can't say everyone settling in america raped and massacred american indians

    8. Re:Tell me... by zulux · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do the North American Indians celebrate?

      Thanksgiving. But they drink their Wild-Turkey.

      (one ticket to hell, window seat please)

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    9. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh and what behavior would that be? do you know or are you just picking out the most heinous acts of a couple assholes throughout history? if you want to feel so bad about yourself go punch an old lady in the throat and then cry about it. and also, have you ever killed an american indian? do you propagate the hatred of american indians? no? then what the fuck is your problem, it's something that happened in the past and shouldn't tried to be used as something to make "whitey" feel guilty just because we have white skin. i hope a dingo eats your fucking baby

    10. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They instead mourn for those whose lives were taken so long ago.

      I'm not going to try to justify anything here, but I'd really like to know why Natives criticize the actions of Europeans but then ignore the oppression and slaughtering of Native tribes by other Natives. Let's face it - if the goal of Natives is to remain free from oppression and killing, the system that's currently in place is much more preferable than the conditions that existed before the Europeans showed up on the scene. I doubt that many Natives today would really want to return to a system where they had to worry about their camp being raided by another warring tribe, with women and children being dragged off and enslaved.

    11. Re:Tell me... by Seumas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Native" people? You mean the original asians that crossed over into the country a long time before there were actual "Indians"?

      Guess what. It's all old shit that I don't care about. And guess what? I'm not a hypocrit, because I'm not sitting around gorging on turkey and shit all day praying to baby jesus for the wonderful new car he gave me or... whatever.

      I'm in the office, getting work done while others slack off. My Thanksgiving dinner will be a coke and a microwavable "hamburger" from the downstairs vending machine.

    12. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What do the North American Indians celebrate?

      Untaxed, subsidised gambling profits.

    13. Re:Tell me... by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, I don't particularly care to continue the "columbus" myth whatsoever, but at the same time . . . What the fuck do you want from me? It's not like this is the only country that was ever conquered or explored or founded or taken by force or anything else. Not the first and not the last.

      Frankly, I'm tired of people trying to lay some trip on me because I'm a "white male". What the fuck did I have to do with buttraping the natives on this country and taking their land? Hey - I'm real sorry about how it all went down, but my family was from Russia and Germany - not Spain - and they only came over within the last century. And I'm pretty fucking sure they weren't royalty or had anything to do with or control to change what happened on this continent.

      Should all the people who have migrated to Australia in the last decade be responsible for what Britain did to the aboriginies in the last century or two?

      On the other hand, it does seem silly to celebrate. But isn't that the Christian way? Fuck someone over, make a holiday for it or take their holiday and make it their own.. voila. Kinda like the whole pagans and Christmas thing. Or the pagans and easter thing.

      Interestingly enough, it does still seem to be what is tought in school, which is fairly amazing.

    14. Re:Tell me... by ph1ll · · Score: 1
      I heard a similar sentiment from a German friend when he told me that in some parts of Germany they celebrate Kristallnacht.

      "Isn't that awful?" I asked.

      "Ja! It's terrible vat vee did to der Jews in der Second World War, but Kristallnacht brings der whole family together."

      When I pushed him on the matter he became defensive.

      "It's not my fault!" he protested. "I didn't invent der holiday! My parents are from Croatia so it's nothing to do with me! I'm only twenty seven, for f*cks sake!"

      I told him I was Jewish and found the celebrating Kristallnacht - even though it was now just a reason for families to be together - somewhat insensitive.

      "Der family is very important to we Germans," he said. "Don't be upset! It's not anti-Semitic. You're my friend. I don't mean to be offensive. And besides, it was such a long time ago!".

      I turned down his invitation to join his family for his Kristallnacht celebrations. He didn't really understand why. I guess some people just aren't terribly culturally sensitive.

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    15. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very nicely done. Likewise it wasn't my choice to be an Asian immigrant. I wish the folks left me alone. I didn't come here to steal a job!

    16. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what? I DONT CARE!

    17. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They celebrate not being taken over the Russians and rest of the world.

    18. Re:Tell me... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'm tired of people trying to lay some trip on me because I'm a "white male".

      I believe the "White man" reference was directed towards the very first settlers who in comparison to the Natives were lighter skinned, hence the description of "white".

      Had darker skinned people from Africa settled, or yellow skinned from Asia, I'm sure the Natives would have said "Black man", or "Yellow man" instead. Which has no bearing on those people of the same skin colour today.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    19. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh and what behavior would that be? do you know or are you just picking out the most heinous acts of a couple assholes throughout history? if you want to feel so bad about yourself go punch an old lady in the throat and then cry about it.

      And it's exactly this kind of "logic" that often makes me embarassed of my white skin, what with people like this who have it who can so easily forgive 300 years of carnage, disease, warfare, etc. caused by other people who have it. This isn't the kicker, read my next paragraph for the kicker.

      and also, have you ever killed an american indian? do you propagate the hatred of american indians? no? then what the fuck is your problem, it's something that happened in the past and shouldn't tried to be used as something to make "whitey" feel guilty just because we have white skin. i hope a dingo eats your fucking baby

      So if, as your reward for showing me around town when I first moved in, I murdered your family and robbed you of everything you had, and I didn't get caught right away, and we met up some years later, you wouldn't be angry with me about it, since it's something that happened in the past?

      Shit, where do you live? How's your money flow going? Your daughter is very pretty...

      (I am, of course, not serious, but still...)

    20. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf? since when do i "have it"? the indians even said they "don't have it" so what's wrong if the settlers claim "it"? i also think you're conveniently forgetting that the indians also did a lot of murdering and not to mention there is a whole dispicable act that you learn as a child named after indians (you know indian giving if you don't remember, where you trade and then take back what you 'traded'). you are seriously messed up in the head. like i said, if you really want to feel so bad about who you are don't just look at fucking things in the past THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH YO--go out and punch an old lady in the throat you emo masochistic bitch. geez, murdering my family and someone 400 years ago only connected to you by by the color of your skin maybe possibly being one of the people who screwed over the indians are two very different things and if you can't tell the difference, well goddamn i hope you kill yourself out of self loathing before you fucking breed

    21. Re:Tell me... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you're understanding the distinction with Thanksgiving.

      It is currently celebrated as an occasion for families to get together and, supposedly, for people to express their thanks for whatever things in their life they are thankful for (I'm not sure how pigging out on turkey express that thanks, but that's another discussion). Just because Thanksgiving was celebrated by earlier settlers / evil-doers doesn't make Thanksgiving an "anti-native-american" holiday or even a "pro-Columbus" holiday. That's some time in October and nobody outside of government positions take time off for it as far as I know.

      Christmas has more to do with celebrating something widely that has traditionally subjected a lot of people to a lot of hate and violence and devistation than celebrating a bunch of turkey eating family time has to do with chopping off the hands of gold-ming slaves and trojaning blankets with small-pox.

      When was thanksgiving ever a holiday that had anything to do with being "anti-indian" or "culturally insensitive"? Hell, it's just about the least religious, most benign holiday there is. Just because pilgrams and the evil guys back then sat around and ate turkey together, it makes it evil for us to do it today? Or somehow "insensitive"? I bet they used knives to carve those turkeys and I bet they sat in chairs at tables during the festivities. Does that mean it's insensitive if people sit in chairs around tables and carve their food with knives in 2005?

      I sincerely hope you are not trying to correlate or compare a "holiday" based on the violent actions of that night and persecutions that the holiday signifies with eating turkey. The "holiday" in Germany is celebrating a specific violent event with specific hateful connotations. There is nothing vague about it. Thanksgiving, on the other hand, was never a holiday to celebrate - oh, say - the murder of indians and the theft of land. There was no intention or relation of Thanksgiving being to celebrate some bloody massacre. Seriously. Things couldn't be further apart.

      I'm not sure that's what you're trying to drive at.

    22. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is this informative? Seriously. Does getting mod points make you a fucking moron?

      Oh wait, I'm an Eskimo. No need for me to be ragin'.

      Damn whiteys anyway.

    23. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about that. It's an extremely vague and rather "racist" way of phrasing it. You don't say "the brown man too down the world trade center". You say "guys from Saudi Arabia". Likewise, while I'm not a terribly historically versed individual, I'm pretty sure most of the "evil" was done by "guys from Spain", "guys from France" and "guys from Britain".

      There are lots and lots and lots of "white men" from countless other parts of the world.

    24. Re:Tell me... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. It's an extremely vague and rather "racist" way of phrasing it. You don't say "the brown man too down the world trade center". You say "guys from Saudi Arabia". Likewise, while I'm not a terribly historically versed individual, I'm pretty sure most of the "evil" was done by "guys from Spain", "guys from France" and "guys from Britain".

      There are lots and lots and lots of "white men" from countless other parts of the world.


      I'm not saying it isn't an inflammatory statement. However, for Natives at the time, they didn't know where these invaders came from. The only way for them to reference these people was to pick the most *defining* features about them, which is the paler skin colour. Also, someone probably would describe the hijackers as brown skinned individuals if they have no idea what their backgrounds are.

      In addition to that, if you have ever watched old western movies, the Native Indians always referred to the cowboys as "White Man".

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    25. Re:Tell me... by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      I suppose conquering, founding, taking by force etc. is about as much the "white man's way" as F'ing someone over and making a holiday out of it is the "christian way". In other words, don't become all defensive that people shouldn't "lay some trip" on you while at the same time trying to "lay a trip" on someone else who wasn't involved there either.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    26. Re:Tell me... by dasunt · · Score: 1

      I don't see the Indian tribes apologizing to each other. Where I grew up (Minnesota), the Ojibway drove the Dakota out of the forest over a period of time, stealing their land.

      Lets face it: Human history is pretty damn cruel. If you survived, you are probably decended from some pretty mean bastards. Perhaps your ancestors got the short end of the stick recently, but that doesn't mean that they gave others the short end of the stick before that.

    27. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf? since when do i "have it"? the indians even said they "don't have it" so what's wrong if the settlers claim "it"?

      Selective hearing must feel great. Especially when someone is talking about their white skin and you apparently only hear "land and natural resources" - which, coincidentally, was shared among all tribes until the "white man" came along and claimed it as their exclusive property.

      i also think you're conveniently forgetting that the indians also did a lot of murdering

      Seeing as how the Europeans were basically stealing everything they had and killing them off, I don't really blame them for that. Self-defense and all.

      and not to mention there is a whole dispicable act that you learn as a child named after indians (you know indian giving if you don't remember, where you trade and then take back what you 'traded').

      And there's also "Dutch treat" (both pay their own way) and "Mexican breakfast" (glass of water and a cigarette) and "N****r rich" (rich compared to poor people) and a whole bunch of other prejudiced phrases in our society.

      you are seriously messed up in the head. like i said, if you really want to feel so bad about who you are don't just look at fucking things in the past THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH YO--go out and punch an old lady in the throat you emo masochistic bitch.

      Your kind of flaming, illogical, racist mentality is what I feel sorry and embarassed for. People like you are the ones that make me feel bad and people like you are the ones that need to be punched in the throat. I'm not a masochist, but you sure seem like a sadist.

      geez, murdering my family and someone 400 years ago only connected to you by by the color of your skin maybe possibly being one of the people who screwed over the indians are two very different things and if you can't tell the difference, well goddamn i hope you kill yourself out of self loathing before you fucking breed

      1) You did read that last line in the original post, right? The one that said I'm not serious?

      2) I figure it must be hard to cope with the absence of thousands of years of one's culture, heritage, land, lifestyle, people, etc. even if that was "all in the past" and one has another culture, heritage, lifestyle, people, etc. imported from a faraway land to take its place. Yeah, I'd conjecture that they have a reason to be sore at us and our holidays (particularly Columbus Day).

      In conclusion, please dye your skin green and don't tell anyone you're descended from white people. We have enough embarassing things to deal with as it is.

    28. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the use of bunnies and eggs in the 'easter' tradition have not been proven to be from pagan influence. the eggs and bunnies could be used to symbolize life and rebirth, rather than the worship of some obscure germanic goddess. the holiday itself is of course absolutely christian, even though christians can't even decide what month it should be held on ;)

    29. Re:Tell me... by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

      Those remaining? They celebrate surviving the relentless hordes of new people displacing them off the land that they in turn displaced somebody else from. And the flood of new and special diseases.

      Roughly speaking, it's pretty close to what the first European colonists were celebrating: survival. Don't knock it. I can't think of much more important to celebrate. Yeah I know it's politically incorrect not to sympathize with the poor put upon natives. But I'll be damned if I'll feel any kind of remorse for the fact that I was born here and survived.

    30. Re:Tell me... by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

      Damn right! Eff the man!

      Give me the Wild Turkey.

    31. Re:Tell me... by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1
      Roughly speaking, it's pretty close to what the first European colonists were celebrating: survival. Don't knock it. I can't think of much more important to celebrate.


      Are you speaking for the Indians? "Roughly speaking," perhaps?

      It's easy to be cocky about the survival of the fittest when you're on the trigger-end of a gun, unlike the Aztec, Mayan, Incan, Polynesian, Indian, Australian "aboriginal", Jew, Roma, Bosniak, and so on.

      If survival of the fittest by whatever means is the Great Principle and all human life is capable of in your view, I assume that you'd be equally philosophical if those whom you love were cut to pieces by Crusaders looking for gold or thugs looking for fenceable items and an easy fuck.

      Your birth was as random an event as mine. Celebrate that if you like, but the fact that we got born is no credit to us, and not much credit to those who bore us.

      How we live our lives is where the credit is.

      Yeah I know it's politically incorrect not to sympathize with the poor put upon natives. But I'll be damned if I'll feel any kind of remorse for the fact that I was born here and survived.


      Remorse is unnecessary -- I assume you've killed no one. But it isn't clever or innovative to talk callously, to ignore the mistakes of history, or to dismiss the plight of a vagrant asleep on the sidewalk because you are grand.

      We can agree that there's more than enough hypocrisy and murderous greed in the world. Here's what I know: there would be more of both if not for people who oppose them.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  6. Obj: Thanksgiving is in July... by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Funny


    At least for those of us in the UK :)

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Obj: Thanksgiving is in July... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least for those of us in the UK :)

      I thought Tnanks Giving was just another name for harvest festival. Isn't that generally September?

    2. Re:Obj: Thanksgiving is in July... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? We don't have Thanksgiving in the UK, and I can't think what's in July that we celebrate that you may be referring to. Most of us are in Spain in July.

  7. What the hell IS thanksgiving? by bmgz · · Score: 1

    Does it actually exist outside The US of A or am I a total ignoramis or both?

    1. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by cayce · · Score: 1

      Actually only about 6% of the world population actually cares about thanksgiving.

      But this is slashdot after all.

    2. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by cayce · · Score: 1

      According to wikipedia...

      Thanksgiving is closely related to harvest festivals that had long been a traditional holiday in much of Europe. The first North American celebration of these festivals by Europeans was held in Newfoundland by Martin Frobisher and the Frobisher Expedition in 1578. Another such festival occurred on December 4, 1619 when 38 colonists from Berkeley Parish in England disembarked in Virginia and gave thanks to God. Prior to this, there was also a Thanksgiving feast celebrated by Francisco Vásquez de Coronado (along with friendly Teya Indians) on 23 May 1541 in Texas' Palo Duro Canyon, to celebrate his expedition's discovery of food supplies. Some hold this to be the true first Thanksgiving in North America. Another such event occurred a quarter century later on September 8, 1565 in St. Augustine when Pedro Menéndez de Avilés landed; he and his men shared a feast with the natives.

    3. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by toddbu · · Score: 1
      Actually only about 6% of the world population actually cares about thanksgiving.

      Which is really sad. Doesn't the other 94% have anything to be thankful for, or is it that they're just so bitter about life that they can't see the blessings that they have?

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    4. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by sunya · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And since we are playing selective quote, here's one further down from that same page :

      An extract from chapter 17 of the book Where White Men Fear to Tread, by Russell Means:
      "When we met with the Wampanoag people, they told us that in researching the history of Thanksgiving, they had confirmed the oral history passed down through their generations. Most Americans know that Massasoit, chief of the Wampanoag had welcomed the so-called Pilgrim Fathers - and the seldom mentioned Pilgrim Mothers - to the shores where his people had lived for millennia. The Wampanoag taught the European colonists how to live in our hemisphere by showing them what wild foods they could gather, how, where, and what crops to plant, and how to harvest, dry, and preserve them.
      The Wampanoag now wanted to remind white America of what had happened after Massasoit's death. He was succeeded by his son, Metacomet, whom the colonist called "King" Philip. In 1617-1676, to show "gratitude" for what Massasoit's people had done for their fathers and grandfathers, the Pilgrims manufactured an incident as a pretext to justify disarming the Wampanoags. The whites went after the Wampanoag with guns, swords, cannons, and torches. Most, including Metacomet, were butchered. His wife and son were sold into slavery in the West Indies. His body was hideously drawn and quartered. For twenty-five years afterward Matacomet's skull was displayed on a pike above the whites' village. The real legacy of the Pilgrim Fathers is treachery.
      Americans today believe that Thanksgiving celebrates a bountiful harvest, but that is not so. By 1970, the Wampanoag had turned up a copy of a Thanksgiving proclamation made by the governor to the colony. The text revealed the ugly truth: After a colonial militia had returned from murdering the men, women, and children of an Indian village, the governor proclaimed a holiday and feast to give thanks for the massacre. He also encouraged other colonies to do likewise - in other words, every autumn after the crops are in, go kill Indians and celebrate your murders with a feast.


      In November 1970, their decendants returned to Plymouth to publisize the true story of Thanksgiving and, along with about two hundred other Indians from around the country, to observe a national day of Indian mourning."


      Or you can read the entire page here.

      --
      MLT - simple and robust open source multimedia framework for Linux
    5. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just the US. I'm not a Canadian, but I'm pretty sure they celebrate it albeit on a slightly different date.

      I'm pretty sure there are other countries that do as well, but I'm not sure of the specifics.

    6. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Dr.+Dew · · Score: 2, Informative
      In my opinion, the best explanation of what Thanksgiving is comes from U.S. President Abraham Lincoln's proclamation, copied from today's Salt Lake Tribune, of all places:
      The year that is drawing towards its close, has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God.

      In the midst of a civil war of unequalled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign States to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere except in the theatre of military conflict; while that theatre has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union.

      Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the fields of peaceful industry to the national defence, have not arrested the plough, the shuttle, or the ship; the axe had enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than heretofore. Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege and the battle-field; and the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years, with large increase of freedom.

      No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.

      It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and voice by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to his tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquillity and Union.

      In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

      Done at the city of Washington, this third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-eighth.

      - A. Lincoln
    7. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Hosiah · · Score: 0, Troll
      For those of you outside the USA, Thanksgiving is just a feast day. Nothing more, nothing less. Our family celebrates it in a pagan sense (last big feast before winter sets in), but the propaganda is that the first settlers of the US were so grateful for finding the new world and the indians were grateful because they weren't getting killed by the invading white man yet, yada yada.

      Pay no attention to the propaganda - or do what my family, social circle, and I did the first Thanksgiving after the beginning of the Iraq war: have a Ghandi Thanksgiving, in protest of the United States' global conquest. "Feast" on Ghandi's diet of rice, vegetables, goat's milk, and fruit. Spend the day in meditation and in remembrance of all the victims of the United States, be they the virtually genocided original American natives, the enslaved peoples imported to work and build the wealth the US currently wields as it's basis of power, or the various nations of the middle East currently being pirated under false pretenses.

      And this post is dedicated to all the /.ers who will be flaming it and modding it down, though this will not diminish it's truth. I've given them something to hate to be grateful for, hate being the most patriotic American emotion.

    8. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      Of course, none of this has anything to do with the national holiday of Thanksgiving. That was started during the Civil War. (George Washington had previously suggested a day of Thanksgiving, but interest and results varied.)

    9. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, why would anyone mod you down when your post is so rife with hypocracy, propaganda and rhetoric? Not to mention being totally off topic?
      </SARCASM>

    10. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by philwx · · Score: 1

      Pay no attention to the propaganda - or do what my family, social circle, and I did the first Thanksgiving after the beginning of the Iraq war: have a Ghandi Thanksgiving, in protest of the United States' global conquest. "Feast" on Ghandi's diet of rice, vegetables, goat's milk, and fruit. Spend the day in meditation and in remembrance of all the victims of the United States, be they the virtually genocided original American natives, the enslaved peoples imported to work and build the wealth the US currently wields as it's basis of power, or the various nations of the middle East currently being pirated under false pretenses.

      I think you need to smoke some marijuana and chill out just a little bit. As Americans, we are well aware of the events that started this country. You are not telling us anything new. Yes, we pushed Indians out so we could move in. Though at that time we were actually Europeans :)

      Doesn't your religion teach forgiveness? This is ancient history. Why dwell on negativity on a feast day of all things. Yes, American children are taught that thanksgiving involves European pilgrims (I might add) and the natives getting together for a feast, because the Indians helped the pilgrims survive by sharing resources and agricultural knowledge, doesn't sound too lopsided for that particular event. But yeah, there is a lot more to it and surely a lot of carnage when they began to compete for land.

      I'll add that: In any country, the population there exists because they pushed out the previous occupants at one point in history.

      I'll also add that no country is more self-analytical than America. Go to an American University. They do not sugarcoat anything. In fact, some americans consider Universities to be "anti american" because they are so blunt with the truth. As long as we are first to criticize ourselves, there is no need for your bitterness.

      As for the middleeast, join the 65% of Americans who are dissatisfied with Bush. Yeah they reelected him, but that is the Democratic system at work. You convince enough little old ladies that the big bad terrorist is going to get them, and they will vote for you; turning a blind eye to just about any other issues. That is the flaw of Democracy, unfortunately. No body said it was perfect, just better than the alternatives.

    11. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by wk633 · · Score: 1

      In Canada it's on the USA's Columbus day. It's not nearly the big deal it is in the US. Family, sure, but none of this flying accross the country and taking the day after off as well.

    12. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Um, I know wikipedia is much derided (and justly so in some cases), but just go there for questions like this.

      It has a fairly good write up, at least as far as I went into it. And it mentions football.

      Happy thanksgiving to the Americans on /.

      Disclaimer: I celebrated last month.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    13. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't the other 94% have anything to be thankful for

      Not only do we have things to be thankful for, but in fact we have things to be thankful for more than one day a year. Imagine that!

    14. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Planesdragon · · Score: 0

      Spend the day in meditation and in remembrance of all the victims of the United States, be they the virtually genocided original American natives, the enslaved peoples imported to work and build the wealth the US currently wields as it's basis of power, or the various nations of the middle East currently being pirated under false pretenses.

      Sheesh.

      1: The United States of America treated its conquered prior-settlers better than any country ever had previously. Those who adapted to the new culture were, after a generation at most, taken in with open arms. Those who did not, well, they have legally binding soverign land to hang out on.

      2: Most of America's wealth came not from slavery, but from the abundant natural resources. The closest our prosperity comes to slavery is "economic" slavery, but even that had been largely abandoned as the rewards to allowing and rewarding innovation and success became apaprant.

      3: The "various nations of the middle east current being pirated" include exactly two -- one who harbored and refused to give up terrorists, and how has a nicely democratic government (although a bit strained by the extant hostilities), and one whose dictator was a tyrant and whose people are getting, if not a perfect government, one better than when we came in.

      Of course, if we were "pirating" them we'd be taking more than we are, setting up an imperial colony or giving them a bill for the war. If you must slander them in the name of snobishness, you might want to consider using a better word -- "invade", "conquer", "savange", or "maraud" are much more accurate than "pirate."

      4: Kindly remove the hateful words from your own mouth before chastising others about you. Our country isn't perfect, but it's doing the best it can.

    15. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      I think many countries have a harvest festival; that goes back a lot further than America has even existed. Japan's Thanksgiving is on November 23, but they just view it as another day off. They celebrate small fall festivals per locality during September and October, which usually involve pulling around a large danjiri float, dancing, and making a general ruckus. It's very entertaining.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    16. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is really sad. Doesn't the other 94% have anything to be thankful for, or is it that they're just so bitter about life that they can't see the blessings that they have?

      We're thankful every day we're not living in America with arrogant pricks like you.

    17. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      Doesn't your religion teach forgiveness?

      *scanning my post* WHAT religion? I didn't mention that I had one.

      Anyway, (since you doubtless notice by now that I have no problem expressing unpopular, controversial views!) no, I don't believe in forgiveness, not in the sense that the Judeo-Christian, mono-theist, patriarchial faiths do. Forgiveness to them means "You can kill, rape, rob, cheat, lie, any damn thing you want, and as long as you jump on your knees and go 'I confess I'm a sinner!' you're A-OK!" See, we have "Sin is not measured" and then we have "Good works are worth nothing without faith." Put those two concepts together, and basically, what you do to your fellow beings on the material plane doesn't mean jack shit - the only thing that matters is whether you get your happy ass into Heaven. Well, great for you, congratulations, you're an angel. Here's your harp and wings. Great for me, but what about those ten people I killed? What do they get out of it? I *do* believe in atonement and restitution, where you follow up the admission that you did something wrong by doing your best to make things right again. Forgiveness is crap. I wouldn't accept the forgiveness of a cosmic being who could be so petty. And if your wrongdoing is so great that you *can't* make it better(i.e. whole races of people genocided cannot be brought back to life.), well, then, you SHOULD be damned! What else would damning exist for?

      PS I do a similar bah humbug at Christmas in about a month; join me then. Once again, the wife and kids and folks can exchange all the gifts they please - I *insist* on not recieving presents, as I count my joys on the non-materialist spectrum (to put it simply, it's about what I do or what I learn or who I am - not about what I own!), and express disdain for the commercialization of the holiday, the historical pillaging of declaring a bogus holiday in the first place to overshadow the Wiccan Yule festival, yadda yadda yadda. It's tradition. I'm less of a pain in the ass on the other holidays, but that's an oversight - I'm working on it.

    18. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since you doubtless notice by now that I have no problem expressing unpopular, controversial views!

      Or whiny self-aggrandizement. How Ghandian.

    19. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      So, in other words, you believe everyone is going to hell then? You don't believe in either forgiveness or mercy? You must not have a lot of friends then. People make mistakes all the time and if you cannot forgive and forget, then I have a hard time seeing how you can keep friends for long.

      Perhaps, you should go on a sabbatical and look inside yourself. Chances are, you will not be as "holier than thou" after you examine your own soul. Then perhaps you will see that everyone has sinned.

      Here is a little tidbit for you about the religion you are slagging off on. Christ said that a man sins not only by the acts he commits or the words he utters but also by his thoughts. If you are thinking about wanting to kill me right now, you are no better than a murderer in the eyes of God.

      You really don't seem to get it and are attacking a faith out of ignorance. People fear what they do not understand.

      Stop being such a judgemental hypocrite. The hatred you feel hurts you more than it does those you hate.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    20. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      People make mistakes all the time and if you cannot forgive and forget, then I have a hard time seeing how you can keep friends for long.

      Genocide is a fucking "mistake"? And thoughts are the same thing as deeds? Listen, if you have more friends than I do, it's probably because your aim is off. By the way, whose religion is it again that has as it's central symbol a torturous execution device?

    21. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      What genocide are you talking about? Are you blaming the actions of settlers in the area now called America on all Christians? My ancestors in Finland had nothing to do with it nor did the ancestors of people from many other Christian nations. You logic is as flawed as if I were to suggest that all Muslims were to blame for 9/11.

      I have news for you pal, northern Europe was populated by other humans before being displaced by migrations of Caucasians from the east. This type of "genocide" had been happening on continental Europe and the British Isles for several millennia. I think what the Americans did was wrong but you act as if this had not happened before. The natives were outmatched on this continent militarily just as they were when the Europeans invaded Europe from the east.

      As for you comment on the cross, it is a symbol of the sacrifice. That dude took the worst possible punishment a criminal could receive when he was falsely accused. There in, lies the sacrifice bit. He represented the "lamb" of God. Lambs were considered "clean" animals suitable for sacrifice. Are you aware of other cultures in the past sacrificing virgins? Why do you think they chose virgins instead of just anybody? They answer is they represent purity.

      You act as if Christ and Christians did something horrible to you or that he was out of touch with the rest of the world. Here are some facts for you:
      He was conceived to an unwed mother. This would have been the greatest embarrassment in the middle east of that time.
      He was born in a barn. If that is not "common", I don't know what is.
      He worked as a carpenter until he was 30. Sounds like a hard working Joe doesn't he?
      He ended up travelling from town to town often sleeping outside. Do you have a problem with homeless people?

      Be thankful that you have a roof over your head and have the freedom to be the asshole you are all thanks to those "Evil Christians" that invaded North America. You are always free to leave if you don't like it.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    22. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by philwx · · Score: 1

      *scanning my post* WHAT religion? I didn't mention that I had one. Man, I wish I would've checked my email sooner. Amazing that you ignore 90% of my post except the religion remark. But a lot of people would consider "meditating on people who have been killed by America" while eating "Ghandi's diet" somewhat of a spiritual thing. Unless you can show me scientific evidence of this accomplishing something, I'll call it a religious ceremony. In any case, you don't have a religion? How novel. It reminds me of the people in the 1990s who "don't watch television." I guess this is supposed to imply pseudo-intellectual status. Not overly difficult to only believe in only what your 5 senses can detect, or to not watch TV, in my opinion. Anyway, (since you doubtless notice by now that I have no problem expressing unpopular, controversial views!) Isn't this cliche in 2005? no, I don't believe in forgiveness, not in the sense that the Judeo-Christian, mono-theist, patriarchial faiths do. Hurray for the atypical anti-western-civilization rant. Surely we've never seen this before. You were no doubt hoping someone would pop the lid off the subject so you could pretend it wasn't something you dwell on. I'm picturing someone in the 90s awkwardly starting a converation, "see anything on TV lately? Oh yeah? pshh, I don't watch TV, myself.." I *do* believe in atonement and restitution, where you follow up the admission that you did something wrong by doing your best to make things right again. This idea is not unique to you, sorry. And the fact that it isn't answers your rant about how you *assume* over people view forgiveness. And if your wrongdoing is so great that you *can't* make it better(i.e. whole races of people genocided cannot be brought back to life.), well, then, you SHOULD be damned! What else would damning exist for? Yes but, was it one person who killed all those people, or was it an entire civilization? And do you damn an entire civilization? Perhaps. I could go either way here. PS I do a similar bah humbug at Christmas in about a month; join me then. Once again, the wife and kids and folks can exchange all the gifts they please - I *insist* on not recieving presents, as I count my joys on the non-materialist spectrum (to put it simply, it's about what I do or what I learn or who I am - not about what I own!), and express disdain for the commercialization of the holiday, the historical pillaging of declaring a bogus holiday in the first place to overshadow the Wiccan Yule festival, yadda yadda yadda. It's tradition. I'm less of a pain in the ass on the other holidays, but that's an oversight - I'm working on it. Sounds like fun. Work on the originality of your rants, though. These types of "radical thoughts" pass through everyone's mind at one point or another.

    23. Re:What the hell IS thanksgiving? by philwx · · Score: 1

      Holy wall of text Batman. I'll post the readable version:

      *scanning my post* WHAT religion? I didn't mention that I had one.

      Man, I wish I would've checked my email sooner. Amazing that you ignore 90% of my post except the religion remark. But a lot of people would consider "meditating on people who have been killed by America" while eating "Ghandi's diet" somewhat of a spiritual thing. Unless you can show me scientific evidence of this accomplishing something, I'll call it a religious ceremony.

      In any case, you don't have a religion? How novel. It reminds me of the people in the 1990s who "don't watch television." I guess this is supposed to imply pseudo-intellectual status. Not overly difficult to only believe in only what your 5 senses can detect, or to not watch TV, in my opinion.

      Anyway, (since you doubtless notice by now that I have no problem expressing unpopular, controversial views!)

      Cliche in 2005?

      no, I don't believe in forgiveness, not in the sense that the Judeo-Christian, mono-theist, patriarchial faiths do.

      Hurray for the atypical anti-western-civilization rant. Surely we've never seen this before. You were no doubt hoping someone would pop the lid off the subject so you could pretend it wasn't something you dwell on. I'm picturing someone in the 90s awkwardly starting a converation, "see anything on TV lately? Oh yeah? pshh, I don't watch TV...."

      I *do* believe in atonement and restitution, where you follow up the admission that you did something wrong by doing your best to make things right again.

      This idea is not unique to you, sorry. And the fact that it isn't answers your rant about how you *assume* over people view forgiveness.

      And if your wrongdoing is so great that you *can't* make it better(i.e. whole races of people genocided cannot be brought back to life.), well, then, you SHOULD be damned! What else would damning exist for?

      Yes but, was it one person who killed all those people, or was it an entire civilization? And do you damn an entire civilization? Perhaps. I could go either way here.

      PS I do a similar bah humbug at Christmas in about a month; join me then. Once again, the wife and kids and folks can exchange all the gifts they please - I *insist* on not recieving presents, as I count my joys on the non-materialist spectrum (to put it simply, it's about what I do or what I learn or who I am - not about what I own!), and express disdain for the commercialization of the holiday, the historical pillaging of declaring a bogus holiday in the first place to overshadow the Wiccan Yule festival, yadda yadda yadda. It's tradition. I'm less of a pain in the ass on the other holidays, but that's an oversight - I'm working on it.

      Sounds like fun.

  8. And She Doesn't Even Touch the Biggest One by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I notice she doesn't even bring up the point that there is a lot of evidence that the first Thanksgiving in the New World was held in Virginia (I believe at Berkley Plantation). There's evidence both ways, but the VA Thanksgiving has enough backing it that it can't be ignored.

    But suggesting to most Americans that it wasn't the Pilgrims must be a little too much for some to consider.

    1. Re:And She Doesn't Even Touch the Biggest One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for that is that it's irrelevant. I have no doubt that a group of settlers landed safely in Virginia and declared a day of thanks for their safe arrival. That's not really what the "real" Thanksgiving is about. Many people at many time have declared celebrations in thanks of successes. The Pilgrims' thanksgiving was much more in line with what we celebrate today.

    2. Re:And She Doesn't Even Touch the Biggest One by whitehatlurker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does the Virginia party predate the one by Frobisher's expedition in 1578?

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  9. I am thankful for... by CriminalNerd · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...computers and positive karma on /.

  10. How am I going to play with my girlfriend's toys? by moofdaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Turkey doesn't make you sleepy?! Now how am I going to get my girlfriend to fall asleep so I can play with the antique toys she won't let me touch?

    --
    Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
  11. Thanksgiving existance outside US examples. by tzot · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a European from Southern Europe, I only know about thanksgiving from American movies and television. Same goes for Halloween (although we do have carnivals the last 3 Sundays before the 40-day fasting for Easter).

    There is a trend, though, to "internationalize" these American celebrations, mainly for consuming purposes I guess (part of the globalization matters).

    I'll let others talk about their experience.

    --
    I speak England very best
  12. another critical article by Doviende · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "Some aspects of the conventional story are true enough. But it's also true that by 1637 Massachusetts Gov. John Winthrop was proclaiming a thanksgiving for the successful massacre of hundreds of Pequot Indian men, women and children, part of the long and bloody process of opening up additional land to the English invaders."
    from Robert Jensen's Give Thanks No More

    here's another part of it i found interesting:

    Any attempt to complicate this story guarantees hostility from mainstream culture. After raising the barbarism of America's much-revered founding fathers in a lecture, I was once accused of trying to "humble our proud nation" and "undermine young people's faith in our country."

    Yes, of course -- that is exactly what I would hope to achieve. We should practice the virtue of humility and avoid the excessive pride that can, when combined with great power, lead to great abuses of power.

    -doviende

    --
    "The value of a man resides in what he gives,
    and not in what he is capable of receiving."
    --Albert Einstein
    1. Re:another critical article by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      by 1637

      Yes, I'm really going to have to talk to my grandparents about that. Oh, wait... that was almost 400 years ago.

      Any chance we can just enjoy the tradition as it is currently enjoyed by millions of people? You know - in the general spirit of family togetherness, and blissfully minus too much of the commercialization (um, other than transportation use) that makes the rest of the holidays such a mess?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:another critical article by Scoth · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you're based or how old you are (going to assume Canada from your domain and the entries there), but keep in mind that down here in the States the Founding Fathers are held up almost as deities leading the charge of the great nation in it's beginnings. It seems to have increased in the last 20 or 30 years or so. While they definitely did good work against great odds, the idea they might have human foibles and failings will often elicit very strong negative reactions from people. During the whole thing recently when Thomas Jefferson's relations with a black slave resulting in child(ren) came out, there were people calling for the heads of the claimants for even suggesting Jefferson might have done it. Even bringing up that many of the founding fathers had slaves at all will get you criticised.

      Ah well, so goes the indoctrination of the masses, I suppose.

    3. Re:another critical article by crabpeople · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Any chance we can just enjoy the tradition as it is currently enjoyed by millions of people?"

      absolutly right! who cares about the bloody history of how america was founded? its not like it has any baring on americas conduct in the world today or anything.

      "those who forget history...."

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    4. Re:another critical article by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that thinking is reflective of the fact that most Americans are wholly unaware of their history/heritage and could care less.*

      Things like slavery, Native American massacres, corruption, lynchings, etc are a fundamental part of what America is, but nobody wants to talk about it.

      Thanksgiving can be whatever you want it to be, its just that for most people, it only reflects a stylized & idealized version of the past.

      *I'd discuss how people are unaware of the facts behind thanksgiving in the same way people are unaware of the origins of Christmas, but thats offtopic.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:another critical article by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      who cares about the bloody history of how america was founded? its not like it has any baring on americas conduct in the world today or anything

      True, we could have just let the bloody regime that formed the colonies stay in power, and it could have had a non-stop, continual bloody fight with the French, the Spaniards, and everyone else with an interest in more land, gold, etc.

      This will be easier: give me a run-down of the cultures and geographical spots that do not have a bloody history going back several centuries, so that we can get all of our societal guidance from them. Western Europe? Nope. Eastern Europe? Nope. Central/South America? Nope. Asia (in any quarter thereof? Nope. North America before the Europeans showed up? Nope. Australia? I could use a refresher on their history, but don't think that continent is free of bloodletting. Hmmm.

      Yes, forgetting history can be an aspect of repeating it... but what makes you think that's a peculiarly American thing? Or that America's history is any more bloody than, say, the Middle East, or the Caucuses, or anyplace else? Now, review the most recent 200 or so years of global history, reviewing the frequency with which the people in each culture and country have had regular, peaceful, democratic changes in government every few years. The US has had its procession of leaders and representatives partially interrupted by one civil war, but has otherwise performed civilly, not bloodily.

      At no point during that history has gathering around a table with family been somehow less about gathering around a table with family. Whether or not some sects or towns or states have made pronouncements along the way about other meanings of the (age old) harvest feasts held this time of year, such gatherings provide their own meaning - and for most people (not counting turkeys), it's peaceful and a moment to reflect on giving a damn about at least some members of our families.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:another critical article by Doviende · · Score: 2, Interesting
      perhaps you should read the article i posted ;)

      here's another quote from it, which references your response:

      But when one brings into historical discussions any facts and interpretations that contest the celebratory story and make people uncomfortable -- such as the genocide of indigenous people as the foundational act in the creation of the United States -- suddenly the value of history drops precipitously and one is asked, "Why do you insist on dwelling on the past?"

      and i particularly like this one:

      Obscuring bitter truths about historical crimes helps perpetuate the fantasy of American benevolence, which makes it easier to sell contemporary imperial adventures -- such as the invasion and occupation of Iraq -- as another benevolent action.

      but sure, there are lots of times when we should celebrate friendship and family...let's just not make it into a fantastical fairy tale about a 'glorious' past.

      -doviende

      --
      "The value of a man resides in what he gives,
      and not in what he is capable of receiving."
      --Albert Einstein
    7. Re:another critical article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and that's the same Grade A Asshat who was blaming the victims of 9/11 for the attack. He's currently on a run of "hate the white man"-type journalism.

      It may be foolish to blindly insist everything our ancestors did was wonderful, but it's just as disturbing to spend all your time twisting everything in our past as evil.

    8. Re:another critical article by Doviende · · Score: 1
      saying that genocide is evil isn't the same as saying everything is evil. and telling the truth about american genocide and racism isn't the same as "hate the white man". try not to oversimplify things. I'm white, but i choose to try my best to be an anti-racist ally rather than trying to whitewash history by ignoring everything that was done wrong. I'm pretty sure we both agree that genocide is evil, but maybe you choose not to look for evidence that it happened. i think that with very little effort, you can find plenty of evidence that it did, and that many of the 'founding fathers' and later presidents approved it.

      from the article i posted:

      [Theodore] Roosevelt also once said, "I don't go so far as to think that the only good Indians are dead Indians, but I believe nine out of ten are, and I shouldn't like to inquire too closely into the case of the tenth."

      i think we should try and look and many interpretations, and not just get stuck on the ones that say everything is peachy-keen and no american ever did anything wrong. This is part of critical thinking. we shouldn't need to blindly accept every favourable interpretation. it's our duty to seek out and learn about the parts of history that most people turn a blind eye to.

      -doviende

      --
      "The value of a man resides in what he gives,
      and not in what he is capable of receiving."
      --Albert Einstein
    9. Re:another critical article by Loundry · · Score: 1

      Any chance we can just enjoy the tradition as it is currently enjoyed by millions of people?

      Not without causing some America-haters some real distress. To them, America and anything that Americans enjoy and espescially any parts of their culture that anyone might be aware of must be derided and linked to evil. This is why we are hearing more and more of this "You should feel really guilty, American pig!" around all of our holidays. They tell us that if we should feel anything, we should only feel guilty about horrible things that happened in the past for which we are not responsible.

      Guilt, guilt, guilt. It's like the Christian message, only more whiney.

      The sucky thing is that I can't type this message without it sounding like a horrible troll. Before you mod me troll, please consider the following: I'm through with guilt. I want to live a positive, moral life. I want to remove the things from my life that make me feel bad for no good reason. This is why I no longer have any tolerance for the constant guilt messages from other groups who I think are merely trying to manipulate me into doing something that they want me to do. I don't mind that they say what they want to say -- I just want them to do it far away from me and I'm not interested in their message at all. Is it wrong for me to tell them to shut the hell up on a holiday where I like to get together with family members that I don't get to see very often? My sister is flying in from the U.K., and I don't see her but once a year perhaps. Is it okay for me to to enjoy my time with her without feeling guilty about something my ancestors did, and to tell anyone who feels differently (and insists on trying to make me feel guilty), "I disagree with you, and I will never agree with you, so fuck off!"?

      Okay, rant over. Mod away. I have karma to burn.

      --
      I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
    10. Re:another critical article by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 1
      "Some aspects of the conventional story are true enough. But it's also true that by 1637 Massachusetts Gov. John Winthrop was proclaiming a thanksgiving for the successful massacre of hundreds of Pequot Indian men, women and children, part of the long and bloody process of opening up additional land to the English invaders."

      That is not the origin of Thanksgiving.

      Governor John Winthrop is alleged to have written in his journal:

      "A day of thanksgiving kept in all the churches for our victories against the Pequots, and for the success of the assembly; but by reason of this latter, some of Boston would not be present at the public exercises. The captains and soldiers who had been in the late service were feasted, and after the sermon the magistrates and elders accompanied them to the door of the house where they dined."

      ...after the burning of Fort Mystic, an action in which a few hundred Narragansett and Mohegan Indians fought in, during the Pequot War.

      This, however, was just one of many days of "thanksgiving" that were proclaimed throughout the colonies.

      Suffice it to say, the article you're quoting is nothing more than commie bullshit - distortions and half-truths mixed with outright lies and propaganda.

    11. Re:another critical article by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      If that's a rant, then rant on. I don't buy the "guilt of thy fathers" rap, and I don't buy that the founding fathers of the US, given the circumstances and immediate history/economics into which they were born, makes any flaws in their works of genius somehow evil. The US was a great idea then, and it's a great idea now - especially in contrast with those that are suggesting other social frameworks (like retro-medieval theocracies or we'll-get-it-right-this-time communism, etc). Yes, Thanksgiving has Puritanical roots... because many of the first settlers in colonial America were Puritans. But the concept is valid, even if the society has evolved around it - I'm not giving thanks to a deity, for example, but it's pleasant to sit around with my family and reflect on how great it is to live how and where we live.

      Like you, my patience for the droning time-traveling guilt trip attempts is at its limits. Stop Global Whining (um, and Happy Thanksgiving!).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  13. You learn somthing everyday by nagora · · Score: 3, Interesting
    As a Brit I had always assumed that the "thanks" were being "given" to the Indians for showing them how to grow corn and bringing all that nice food so they didn't starve. Just shows.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:You learn somthing everyday by adolfojp · · Score: 1

      I comment on your comment because of the lack of points to mod you as insightfull.

      I have allways considered thanksgiving day to be a hipocritical celebration based on propaganda instead of history. A celebration of the fact that history is nothing more than the legends of the empires.

      Perhaps we should rewrite thanksgiving day to give it the meaning that you believed to be true. It is the least that we can do to apologize for the native american holocaust that we started after they helped us survive in the new land.

      Cheers,
      Adolfo

    2. Re:You learn somthing everyday by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Given that much of the food had been brought to the Pilgrims, and what food the Piulgrims had had been grown only with Native American knowledge, you're essentially correct. I'd assumed that it had been a corruption of the English "Harvest Festival" and that the fetish with corn was related somehow to the ancient British tradition of making "corn dolls" out of the last corner of uncut crop.


      (I don't know how old the tradition was, but the idea was you chased the spirit of the crop into a corner of the field, by harvesting the rest, then trapped it in a figurine made from the stalks of what was left. The following year, you planted the figurine, so releasing the crop spirits back into the field.)


      Since Thanksgiving involves exactly the same basic elements, it seemed likely to me that the Pilgrims had borrowed from what they would already have known and merely shaped it to serve their purpose. I still believe there must have been some elements of that, but maybe nowhere near as much as I'd thought.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:You learn somthing everyday by HeliumHigh · · Score: 1

      I don't belive that Thanksgiving is anything of the sort. Sure, everyone has heard the 'story' of thanksgiving, but I belive it is more of a time for family and friends and food, not celebration on how the noble brave Americans conqured the land with the help of the indians, or some such story. Well, heck, I don't even care. I'm in it for the food :)

  14. Two questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Antique? How old IS she, anyway? 2) How long have you guys been together?;-)

  15. Turkey does not make you sleepy, by Filter · · Score: 1

    but eating turkey does.

    --

    "better ways of doing things eventually just replace the inferior things" - Linus Torvalds 09-08-07

  16. see what I mean by Bloggins · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ha, if the pilgrims had not been locked into a proprietary file format, we would know what really happened...

    1. Re:see what I mean by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Pilgrims... Plymouth... I guess that explains the real reason why Massachusetts is gunning for OpenDocument.

  17. I'll tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. What REALLY happened on thanksgiving... by MikeSty · · Score: 0
  19. Don't buy the 35lb turkey then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just buy a smaller turkey? 2 people can polish off a 10-12 pound turkey in less than a week, easily, especially if you make soup out of what's left over after a few days. Or you can freeze it for another time when you don't feel like roasting a whole bird.

    1. Re:Don't buy the 35lb turkey then. by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      Also, turkey barbeque is amazing!

      --
      I am Spartacus
    2. Re:Don't buy the 35lb turkey then. by LocoMan · · Score: 1

      And some people can polish off one in less than 15 minutes... :)

      http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/23/turkey.eating.reu t/index.html

  20. Tryptophan by uberchicken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From what I remember on my research into serotonin..

    Tryptophan is an amino acid that is used by the brain to manufacture serotonin. It's present in all protein, and usually you have plenty of it in your bloodstream. However, it can only get into the brain piggybacked on another molecule, and it has to compete with other amino acids for this ride. One way to soak up the other amino acids is to produce insulin with a carbohydrate-only meal. The insulin removes enough of those amino acids to allow more tryptophan into the brain, thereby providing more raw material for serotonin production.

    I'm sticking with the Prozac though.

  21. Re:How am I going to play with my girlfriend's toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    i'm sure she'd be open to you playing with her toys if you didn't refer to them as "antiques."

    wait, are we talking about the same thing?
    </easyjoke>

  22. In the Netherlands there is something alike by TakaIta · · Score: 1
    In the Netherlands there is a Dankdag voor Gewas en Arbeid (thanksgiving for crops and labor). It is only being "celebrated" in some protestant circles. The official date is the first Wednesday in November. Originally it was only for "crops", the "labor" part was added at some point after the industrialization.

    This tradition stems from the Middle Ages. There is a similar day for prayer for crops (and labor), which is on the second Wednesday in March.

    I have no idea if this holds any relation with Thanksgiving as is celebrated in the USA. The way it is "celebrated" in the Netherlands is that there is a special service in church where respectively prayer and thanksgiving for the crops are explicitely mentioned. There is nothing like special food or even families coming together for it. Just some people going to church.

    1. Re:In the Netherlands there is something alike by DeBeuk · · Score: 1

      Don't make it sound like a significant portion (as in >1%) of the Dutch population actually even knows about this; they don't.

      --
      Reality has a notoriously liberal bias -- Stephen Colbert
    2. Re:In the Netherlands there is something alike by TakaIta · · Score: 1

      Don't underestimate the percentage that knows about it. Most people that are raised protestant probably heard about it. The actual participation is probably quite low. Searching for dankdag gives > 25k hits. It might be a bit out of your personal life, but then again, slashdot visitors are in no way representative for a population.

    3. Re:In the Netherlands there is something alike by DeBeuk · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right, and the fact that I live in the catholic part of Holland might have something to do with it ;)

      --
      Reality has a notoriously liberal bias -- Stephen Colbert
  23. ya but... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ..it's a cool holiday anyone can adopt if they so choose, and a great excuse to have a feast and kick back and chow down and relax.

    I'm all in favor of MORE holidays! I think a nice one to one ratio with regular plain vanilla work days is appropriate...

  24. Think of the animals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before eating turkey, have a short thought about what the animal that you are about to eat might have gone through to become your food. Would you like to suffer to be eaten? Just give it a thought.

    I'm not a troll, just a vegetarian.

    1. Re:Think of the animals by DeBeuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not a troll, just a vegetarian.

      Same thing, really.

      --
      Reality has a notoriously liberal bias -- Stephen Colbert
    2. Re:Think of the animals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God put certain animals on this planet for us to eat, others are used as pets. Do you propose we all become vegetarians?

    3. Re:Think of the animals by jftitan · · Score: 1

      Poor thing....

        Salt or peper, please? oh and may I have the giblet gravy!

      nevermind, I'll stick with the brown gravy. Oh this bird tastes so good... I feel really bad, oh poor bird.

      I'm not a Troll either, I just stuffed myself, thanking the turkey the best way I can, by eating it for a week.

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    4. Re:Think of the animals by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      I'm not a troll, just a vegetarian.
      Same thing, really.

      Thanks for saying that, Debeuk, I love it when a guy has the balls to stand up and say, "Hey world, I'm a fucking idiot!"...Don't tell me, you were the guy who, periodically, came runnnng in from school waving your report card..."Look Dad!!! Straight Fs!!!"

      Nice going, dumbass. By the way, have fun with your colorectal cancer...think of me when you're shittin' in a plastic bag. har har har.

    5. Re:Think of the animals by DeBeuk · · Score: 1

      I don't mind you, or anyone else being a vegetarian, but could you do it quietly please? I hate it when people evagelise their beliefs, especially when they throw in things like "colorectal cancer" or "Would you like to suffer to be eaten".
      Sure you're not trolls, you're just being ASSHOLES!

      --
      Reality has a notoriously liberal bias -- Stephen Colbert
  25. A much better article by localroger · · Score: 1

    This Smithsonian article covers some of the same ground in much better and revealing detail. Via a diarist at dkos.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  26. Today... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I give thanks for not living in a country filled with George W's, RIAA's and patent offices.

    Let's celebrate! :D

    *Ducks flying tomato*

    1. Re:Today... by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      What the hell kind of country do you live in that has no patent office? Somalia?

  27. Tryptophan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " there is not enough in turkey to have a sedative affect."

    I'm not inclined to believe this since the guy can't even spell effect right...

  28. Why did they starve, why did they have plenty? by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the other posters here is correct, the Virginia colony very likely had a harvest festival before the Plymouth colony did, if for no other reason than they started a dozen years earlier with exactly the same communal-property=starvation results.

    However, if we are going to discuss the "why"s and "wherefore"s, it would be educational to remember that William Branford, the first governor of the Plymouth colony, wrote it all up.

    Here are some articles with links to the original:

    From http://www.mises.org/story/336

    In his 'History of Plymouth Plantation,' the governor of the colony, William Bradford, reported that the colonists went hungry for years, because they refused to work in the fields. They preferred instead to steal food. He says the colony was riddled with "corruption," and with "confusion and discontent." The crops were small because "much was stolen both by night and day, before it became scarce eatable."

    And from https://www.mises.org/story/1678

    The Pilgrims' unhappiness was caused by their system of common property (not adopted, as often asserted, from their religious convictions, but required against their will by the colony's sponsors). The fruits of each person's efforts went to the community, and each received a share from the common wealth. This caused severe strains among the members, as Colony Governor William Bradford recorded:

    " . . . the young men . . . did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense. The strong . . . had not more in division . . . than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors and victuals, clothes, etc . . . thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And the men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it."

    Or if you really just want the undigested original:

    http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1650bradford.ht ml

    "The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients applauded by some of later times; and that the taking away of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort."

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  29. its a nice holiday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off.

  30. Bad reporter! No turkey for you! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Contrary to popular belief, turkey does not make you sleepy. While purified tryptophan is a mild sleep-inducing agent, there is not enough in turkey to have a sedative affect.

    First of all: EFFECT. Sheesh.

    Secondly, the explanation "tryptophan" came about to awnser the question "why do we all feel sleepy after eating the turkey". So if the explanation is wrong, it doesn't mean the observation was: Double sheesh!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Bad reporter! No turkey for you! by Philzli · · Score: 0

      awnser

      Everyone makes mishtakes, right?

    2. Re:Bad reporter! No turkey for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real answer is that people overeat, and overeating makes you sleepy because it diverts energy to digestion.

      Especially if you're diabetic or pre-diabetic.

  31. Re:How am I going to play with my girlfriend's toy by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

    She won't let you touch her TI486?

  32. I'm Rick James by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine that I'm the only one who was expecting to see a picture of Dave Chapelle as Rick James yelling "It's a celebration, bitch!"

    video here

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  33. A month late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is really falling behind. Thanksgiving WAS IN OCTOBER!
    Duh.
    But thanks for asking, I had a wonderful 10kg Turkey, stuffed with Carrots, Onions, & Celery. Home-made turkey blood gravey.
    Mashed Potatoes, Cranberries, and pan-fried sweet peppers.

    1. Re:A month late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was in October but everyone observes it in November so this post wasn't a month late.

  34. premise is a bit wonky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as i see it, tfa's argument goes something like this; tryptophan might be a precursor to seritonin but it cant pass through the blood brain barrier so it cant be "psychoactive" or more specifically soporific. well thats a real nice piece of logic. so i guess the fact that their are a _tonne_ of seritonin receptors _outside_ the brain, and in particular throughout the gut, that regulate blood to facilitate digestion, couldnt possibly have any kind of sedative effect.

    people, most anyone can tell you turky does make you sleepy, particularly if your a bit deficient anyway, and only eat insufficient protein foods most of the time. But more importantly when you wakeup you feel refreshed and rejuvinated, and enjoy increased mental stamina (cause of the 5ht duh! (within limits))

  35. Re:How am I going to play with my girlfriend's toy by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

    The keys to tha vault everyone else uses: red wine.

  36. Re:The Pilgrims should have served cats by jumpletters · · Score: 1

    The Pilgrims should have served cats then we'd all be eating pussy for dinner.

  37. "Strong possibility" by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1
    For starters, we don't even know for certain if the Pilgrims served turkey, although it's a strong possibility.
    Yes, an extremely strong possibility...given that the turkey was (heck, still is in certain parts of this fine country) an extremely abundant animal, and very commonly hunted by the natives (and later the colonists) for meat. It's almost a certainty that they did. And even if they did not, the turkey itself became such a common source of food for colonial Americans that it often helped keep families fed through the entire colonial period and quickly became an important traditional American food....so what would it matter even if in the unlikely event that it wasn't served at the first Thanksgiving feast?
  38. Gotta hate Encarta... by andrewski · · Score: 0

    Why not check out the article on the Wikipedia instead?

  39. Re:The Pilgrims should have served tofu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stage a revolt and eat tofurkey! it tastes awesome (if cooked right) and will give you a food coma for real

  40. Re:How am I going to play with my girlfriend's toy by iphayd · · Score: 1

    Don't call those parts antique toys and she might let you touch and play with them while she's awake.

  41. Bzzzzttt.... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "post-prandial dip" occurs in people who are bedridden and IV-fed, and is actually accompanied by a decrease in body temp - which means it's not due to a rise in body temp or a result of eating.

    There is on top of that a sleepiness after meals that comes from a dip in blood sugar once insulin kicks in following the ingeston of sugars. The feedback loop of blood sugar and insulin is usually a bit laggy.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  42. care factor zero by fletchzip · · Score: 0

    who cares?

  43. Re:How am I going to play with my girlfriend's toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait a minute....wasn't that a Seinfeld episode? Or am I just drunk from too much turkey?

  44. Lincoln's "Forgotten" Proclamation by chromozone · · Score: 1


    Lincoln's original 1863 Thanksgiving Proclamation

    The year that is drawing toward its close has been filled with the blessings of fruitful years and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the Source from which they come, others have been added which are of so extraordinary a nature that they can not fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever-watchful providence of Almighty God.
    In the midst of a civil war of unequaled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign states to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere, except in the theater of military conflict, while that theater has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union.

    Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the field of peaceful industry to the national defense have not arrested the plow, the shuttle, or the ship; the ax has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than theretofore. Population has steadily increased notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege, and the battlefield, and the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom.

    No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.

    It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently, and gratefully acknowledged, as with one heart and one voice, by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my fellow-citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners, or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it, as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes, to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility, and union.

    In testimony wherof I have herunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

    [Signed]
    A. Lincoln

    1. Re:Lincoln's "Forgotten" Proclamation by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

      The Civil War doesn't make for a cute kindergartener play like the fucking "pilgrims" and indians. you boat-rocking anarchist with your "truth." we don't take kindly to that around these here parts. or don't you like plays?

  45. Re:How am I going to play with my girlfriend's toy by moofdaddy · · Score: 1

    lol...yes, to both.

    --
    Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
  46. Forget sleepy... by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

    they missed the chemical boat: tryptophan was the basis for nearly all anti-depressants for at least a couple of decades. It's also no accident that most low dosage anti-depressants are taken shortly before what is supposedly a normal sleep time for the patient. Tryptophan occurs in some quantity in turkey, but how often do we eat turkey? If you want a nice steady diet of over the counter, low-side effect anti depressant, try a nice peanut butter sandwich before bed. Lots of trypto in PB. Yum.

  47. Not true by aepervius · · Score: 1

    He either pulled your leg, or you are pulling ours. I am in germany right now, lived east, lived north, now I am in Hessen. *NOWHERE* kristallnacht is "celebrated". Maybe in secret, in right wing neo nazi family, and in the basement. But certainly not by normal people from the street.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  48. Re:How am I going to play with my girlfriend's toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Turkey doesn't make you sleepy?! Now how am I going to get my girlfriend to fall asleep so I can play with the antique toys she won't let me touch?

    Her tits?

    Yes yes, boo me straight to hell. It was worth it.

  49. Religious or not ? by Animaether · · Score: 1

    That's what bugged me about the Wikipedia article. It's traditionally a religious festive day, is it not ?
    But the "relig" (religion, religious, etc.) doesn't even appear on the wiki page.

    Now, I know it's probably not viewed as a religious festive day anymore, and more of a social/family gathering thing. But what do people here think ? Thanksgiving Day is a religiuous festive day - yes or no ?

    1. Re:Religious or not ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i do not consider thanksgiving to be a religious holiday. yes the pigrims were primarily calvanist/christian religious people, but the holiday does not originate from within the mythology/history (whatever) of the religion itself. as in passover christmas easter or what have you. becasue of this i consider it to be a secular holiday that happened to originate primarily with people of a certain religion.

  50. All I have ever wanted on Thanksgiving was pizza by Rank_Tyro · · Score: 1

    After years of living on the other side of the country away from my family, all I ever wanted for Thanksgiving dinner was a pizza.

    Twelve years of friends telling me I could not spend Thanksgiving day by myself, I was tortured by surrogate families who did not understand that all I wanted was a pizza and beer, and maybe a decent footbal game.

    Two years ago, when visiting my sister on Thanksgiving Day, she made me a large "DiGornio" pepperoni pizza. That day, I truly gave Thanks. :)

    --
    Today's show is brought to you by the number 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0: 25
  51. I am thankful for... by Deltaspectre · · Score: 0

    My grandmas home cooking and my Wired subscription (Those suckers are *thick*, going to last me allll month until I get the next)

    --
    My UID is prime... is yours?
  52. To everybody who had a problem with my post by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    http://www.alternet.org/story/28584/ Here's a link. You don't like what I said, you'll REALLY hate what he said. And he's so right, especially about the part: "Not only is the thought of such a change in this white-supremacist holiday impossible to imagine, but the very mention of the idea sends most Americans into apoplectic fits".

    *Eyeing my troll mod and flame collection* YAH THINK ???

  53. Wow, talk about your existential angst by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

    I suggest that people should celebrate life and suddenly I'm some kind of sadistic bastard. I don't have a lot of aboriginal blood, but I have to think that the indians living today prefer it to the alternative. I so rarely hear people say "shame my ancestors didn't get wiped out."

    Relax, drink a beer, and stop being embarassed that you're alive. I'm glib, yeah. I like being alive. It lets me do cool things that I couldn't do if I weren't. Try it some day. You might like it too.

    Before you get all high and mighty about what a prick I am, consider who was in Michigan before the Chippewa. The fossil record indicates that they were only the most recent of the invaders before the Europeans showed up (those bastards, with their steel and blue-water sailing). Other peoples lived here first. No trace of their culture of language survives, only some bones and tools that show that they weren't Chippewa. The lesson? Cultures don't live forever. Yet people are still here, and that's a good thing if you're a person.

    Clay Dowling
    Notorious prick

  54. NH state holiday in 1782; not invented by Canada by rrgg · · Score: 1

    It's a little weird how Canadians appear to constantly try to steal thunder. See below: 1782 New Hampshire declares Thanksgiving state holiday 1863 US declares Thanksgiving federal holiday 1872 Canadian Thanksgiving 1879 Canadian Thanksgiving moved to fall This is a lot like Canadian "Heritage Day" invented in 1973 to match up with Washington's Birthday or Presidents' Day in the US.

  55. That's not what people celebrate by rrgg · · Score: 1

    Do you honestly think most people are celebrating the colonization of North America? Seriously I don't think most do. I suspect the vast majority celebrate nothing or they celebrate the things they have in life: family, health, and so on, not just material things. Every year people complain about the commercialism of Christmas, but Thanksgiving is a real honest-to-goodness holiday, at least for me. I know that's incredibly sappy, but it's my point-of-view.