Slashdot Mirror


How the PowerBook was Born

Sabah Arif writes "Apple had no presence in the portables market prior to 1992. Its attempt at creating a laptop Macintosh, the Macintosh Portable, weighed almost 15 lbs and failed to sell. On the personal behest of John Sculley, Apple contracted with Sony to create Asahi, a smaller Portable. Apple developed two high end models in company. After 1992 and until the disastrous 5300, Apple was the leading notebook maker."

277 comments

  1. thin thing by catwh0re · · Score: 2, Interesting

    rumours suggest intel powerbooks will be 25% thinner... if that is even possible.

    1. Re:thin thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible with a little thing called the Reality Compression Field.

    2. Re:thin thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lets see, if its proper length is 1 cm then for it to be 25% thinner it must be 0.75 cm. This means that it needs to be moving 1.98 * 10^8 m/s (L=Lp*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)) and orientated towards you in a way that its width is on the same axis as its 1.98 * 10^8 m/s velocity component. Now the question is how many frames per second you will get when playing Doom 3!

    3. Re:thin thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      if that is even possible.

      Farnsworth: Oh my no. That would require extrememly tiny atoms. And have you priced those lately? I'm not made of money - leave me alone!

    4. Re:thin thing by raindog_mx · · Score: 0

      There's a mistake in (L=Lp*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)). It should be (L=Lp*sqrt(1-v^2)/c^2)

      damn you fat snobs
    5. Re:thin thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that last bit be sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))?

    6. Re:thin thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Order of operations is your friend. '^' evaluates before '/', which evaluates before '-'. Hence L=Lp*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is completely correct since it will evaluate the squares, then the division, then the subtraction, then the square root and then the product (technically the square root is evaulated first which then evaluates its argument value in parentheses).

    7. Re:thin thing by FaramirTook · · Score: 0

      by the time I can afford one, they'll be 50% thinner and come with a jet pack.

  2. And then by eosp · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And now we make up for it with Intels, which mean Windows (someone will try it), which means we're back with the heavy garbage we started with.

  3. The Story condensed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    PowerBook was born while on Safari. The child enjoyed sitting on Pa Apple's laptop, and had a run in with a Tiger at age X. Surviving a SCSI childhood in the mean streets of Motorola, PowerBook grew up to play with Firewire.

  4. ah the original powerbook by nizcolas · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...also affectionately referred to as the luggable

    --
    If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
    1. Re:ah the original powerbook by nizcolas · · Score: 1

      er, sorry folks. this one
      is the luggable.

      --
      If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
    2. Re:ah the original powerbook by gatzke · · Score: 2, Informative

      The classic Compaq was a great luggable. Size of a suitcase with two 5.25" drives. We got a 30 MB add-on drive and that was awesome. 1 MB RAM but DOS only used the first 640k effectively. Clear 7 inch green CRT. Keyboard folded up into bottom of machine, full sized with real key depth.

      That was a luggable machine. 15 pounds is nothing.

    3. Re:ah the original powerbook by gatzke · · Score: 4, Informative

      Found a link to that classic luggable Compaq, from back in the day when real men used laptops.

      http://www.digibarn.com/collections/systems/compaq /

    4. Re:ah the original powerbook by truedfx · · Score: 1

      I used to use a somewhat similar system, a Corona "portable" PC. It's got less RAM, mine didn't have a HD, and it's heavier, but it felt like a great machine at the time. :)

    5. Re:ah the original powerbook by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like the Kaypro that my father-in-law gave to me.

      That thing is a farking boat anchor, but it's technically portable. By elephants.

    6. Re:ah the original powerbook by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      I guess we need to include the Osborne 1 too.

    7. Re:ah the original powerbook by aktzin · · Score: 1

      Back then there was a joke that you could easily spot owners of those early Compaqs or the IBM 5155 Transportables: one arm was longer than the other.

      --
      Quantum mechanics: the dreams that stuff is made of.
    8. Re:ah the original powerbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      weakling

    9. Re:ah the original powerbook by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      I once backpacked a 28 pound Compaq Portable Plus, a Honda portable generator, and a Mannesman Tally Spirit 80 dot matrix printer and a can of gasoline 5km into the bush in order to run the start/finish area of the Ontario Orienteering Relay Championships, using some software I'd written myself in dBase III. That computer was "luggable" in the same sense that Everest Base Camp is.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    10. Re:ah the original powerbook by Svlad_Cjelli1972 · · Score: 0

      Really? So what was the joke?

    11. Re:ah the original powerbook by walter_f · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Note that the Mac Portable came in two releases (the second one of which had a back-lit display). Both of them had lead batteries, adding some more weight apart from the sturdy case. Neither of them was called "PowerBook" officially.

      The first PowerBook proper (i.e., also called by this name) was the PowerBook 100, see:

      http://www.lowendmac.com/pb/100.shtml

      At 5 lbs., the PowerBook 100 can be called a true portable, even by today's standards. It had a processor very similar to that in a Mac Portable (a special version of the MC68000 running at 16 MHz).

      Regards,

      Walter.

      P.S. The PowerBook G3 Series "Wallstreet"/"PDQ" and G3 Firewire "Pismo" - the best of the best among notebook hardware. Maybe the IBM Thinkpad T-series comes close...

    12. Re:ah the original powerbook by jpellino · · Score: 1

      The first PowerBook was the 100 - I still have one, it still works, it's a pretty sweet thing for its time.
      You're thinking of the Portable - it was a beast.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    13. Re:ah the original powerbook by xSmurfster · · Score: 1

      I have to agree that the pismo is probably the best PowerBook of all the PBs (couldn't talk about x86 machines). It was plenty rugged, design was fairly stylish (ok maybe not as much as newer PBs) and theses machines were beasts! Even my Lombard (model that preceded the Pismo and resembles it's hardware) isn't dying. After nearly 6 years of use I still decently runs X on it. I'm kinda sad Apple went the Titanium way. I find the new design less "laptop" like. It looks great on a desk, but the laptop is something you carry around and you expect it to take a few bumps and shocks... but eh image sales doesn't it?

    14. Re:ah the original powerbook by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      weakling
      somehow thats hilarious to me! We had a Kaypro as well.
      I was fairly in love with the whole cp/m era, northstars, kaypros, get on the S-100 Bus...
      We managed to do quite a bit on that beast, essays, term papers, accounting, there was
      some ridiculous game that I loved also.

      --
      music lover since 1969
  5. Just gotta say it by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was at a conference, a week ago, where the presenters were using powerbooks. I think you can tell a lot about a product by how people use it. These things looked really smooth and after all my fits with a WinXP laptop, I desperately want one. Problem is we're a Windoze shop. :p

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Just gotta say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is we're a Windoze shop.

      If possible, just make the switch. I recently had a contract for a small company and whenever I went to a meeting with them it was my PowerBook and their 4 IBM Thinkpads. I saw them the other day and now their company is 3 PowerBooks and 1 ThinkPad.

    2. Re:Just gotta say it by ElectroBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you can't make the switch to Mac or don't want to support both OSes in your shop then you should wait until Intel iBooks or Powerbooks come out. You'll have a laptop with great battery life (for a regular-sized laptop - ultra portables aren't really laptops), great design and you'll be able to run Windows, Mac OS X and Linux on one machine.

    3. Re:Just gotta say it by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Ohh yea, that would be wonderful. Support not one, not two, but three OS's on a single machine. That would be sweet..

      I don't see how getting Macs and running Windows on them would pave any paths to OSX, if I even considered that to be a valid move. Ya, like I wanna trade one vendor lock in for another.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    4. Re:Just gotta say it by ThaFooz · · Score: 1

      That's exactly why you shouldn't get a powerbook. If your IT staff can't even properly support Windows machines in a secure environment, what makes you think they'll know fuck-all about supporting a Mac in that same environment? (Much less like you any more for adding to their existing headaches)

      I don't think thats the problem. IMHO, the issue is more hardware than software related... PC laptops just suck. PC makers operate on razor thin margins - which means cheap (and often proprietary) parts, gawd-awful, tech support, and an enormous number of models. Microsoft has taken on the impossible task of supporting what feels like an infinite number of piss-poor hardware configurations, and though they've done a fairly good job in that respect, there is just no way the machines will be as stable as Apple's controled & limited line. Period. Regardless of how good (or bad) your in-house IT department is.

      I've become rather disgusted with all of the PC makers out there, so I started building my own machines with QUALITY interchangable parts that I could fix myself and never looked back. I couldn't do that when it came time for a laptop, so I gave Apple a shot not because I was a fanboy or hated Windows, but because I felt like they were the only manufacutrer that didn't juse junk parts and or cripple their support/parts department.

      Granted, I'm quite platform agnostic (though OSX is growning on me) as all of my time is spent doing database administration or writing Java/PHP/AJAX, but I don't think I'm in the minority for my reasons for switching to Apple notebooks. I still find PC desktops more cost-effective in terms of hardware and support/repair/maintence cost, but Intel chips and a reasonable price drop in the PowerMacs might change my mind.

    5. Re:Just gotta say it by ThaFooz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was at a conference, a week ago, where the presenters were using powerbooks. I think you can tell a lot about a product by how people use it. These things looked really smooth and after all my fits with a WinXP laptop, I desperately want one. Problem is we're a Windoze shop. :p

      Well, you might be suprised at how well the integrate with Windows. There is an OSX version of MS Office, a Mac Remote Desktop client, Virtual PC for emulating the Windows environment, and AFAIK they can join Windows domains. I mean, unless you're on Visual Studio 24/7, you could probably get away with a switch. Or just wait 8 months for Intel Powerbooks and dual boot :)

    6. Re:Just gotta say it by toddestan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The only problem with that is that it will be damn near impossible to use Windows with one mouse button. Might as well just get a ThinkPad.

    7. Re:Just gotta say it by v1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, VirtualPC lets you use control-click for the missing mouse button. Works surprisingly well, as most mac users are accustomed to using shift, ctrl, option, and cmd as modifiers for the mouse button anyway. I still find myself holding ctrl when trying to pull up the cmm on a windows machine.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    8. Re:Just gotta say it by delire · · Score: 2, Informative
      PC laptops just suck. PC makers operate on razor thin margins - which means cheap (and often proprietary) parts, gawd-awful, tech support, and an enormous number of models..
      What a spectacular load of bollocks.

      'PC' laptops, generally speaking, suffer no worse quality componentry or service deals than Apples. Apple does not 'make' hardware. They outsource production to two of the largest laptop and gadget manufacturers in the world, one of which has a much larger stake in the laptop market than Apple, Asustek. Taiwanese companies Asustek and Quanta are pretty much entirely responsible for delivering the Apple line, from iPods to PB's to MiniMacs.

      Having worked at a university recently (PB's are quite popular in Humanities departments) I was witness to several PB's being returned for that mysterious 'motherboard failure' that we all keep hearing about, and another for a HDD error. In one case the laptop had to be sent away with a turnaround of five weeks. This has caused two defectors to Thinkpads which, I must say, have a better reputation where hardware is concerned.

      This said, The G3's were tanks. A friend of mine's G3 has outlived her PB, and is over three times it's age. The move to Intel at the condition of cost and availability simply puts the Apple laptop within the same production and distribution chain as the rest of the re-branded portables.

      Quality of hardware is not Apple's edge anymore; it's just not in their interest to compete on that level, one at the expense of market share.
    9. Re:Just gotta say it by mlewan · · Score: 1
      "I desperately want one. Problem is we're a Windoze shop."


      That usually means that you need a Windows laptop for a few odd tasks. If you were to buy a Mac yourself, depending on your line of work I guess you could do 90% - 100% of it on the Mac. It's fun to try to find Mac equivalents to the software your company wants you to use. Quite often the Mac equivalent turns out to be better (i.e. more powerful, more ergonomic or simply more pleasing).

    10. Re:Just gotta say it by User+956 · · Score: 1

      I don't think thats the problem. IMHO, the issue is more hardware than software related...

      Which is exactly my point. A linux machine with a bad stick of ram is going to barf just as often as a windows or apple machine with that same bad stick of ram. But-- is the IT department going to know enough about the apple or linux machine to be able to immediately identify the bad ram as the problem? I'm guessing not.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    11. Re:Just gotta say it by ThaFooz · · Score: 1

      Well, my problems with your orginial post were that it implied:
      a) That having difficulty with a Windows machine automaticaly equals a dumb user and/or dumb IT department (and not a poor notebook and/or poor OS)
      b) A Mac is as difficult (if not more) to configure than a Windows machine, and equally prone to hardware problems.

      And I would disagree with both implications. Thats all.

    12. Re:Just gotta say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there still some people out there who are completely unaware that any old 2-button USB mouse is instantly recognized and functional in Mac OS X as soon as you plug in the mouse?

    13. Re:Just gotta say it by User+956 · · Score: 1

      Well, regardless of the truth of what I said, the Apple zealots modded it down. Heaven forbid anyone make their computer purchase using actual logic or common sense.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    14. Re:Just gotta say it by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Do you really want to haul around a USB mouse to plug into your Powerbook for everytime that you boot out of OSX?

    15. Re:Just gotta say it by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      Do you really want to boot out of OSX?

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  6. I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by ReformedExCon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just wish they'd use a better screen. Comparing Mac laptops to Windows laptops is like night and day, literally. The Mac laptops have such dim screens compared to the laptops that are available for Windows.

    I suppose it keeps the cost down, but if there is one area that really ought not be skimped on (especially for machines meant to be used by graphic designers), the LCD monitor is it, in my opinion.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just wish they'd use a better screen. Comparing Mac laptops to Windows laptops is like night and day, literally. The Mac laptops have such dim screens compared to the laptops that are available for Windows.

      I suppose it keeps the cost down, but if there is one area that really ought not be skimped on (especially for machines meant to be used by graphic designers), the LCD monitor is it, in my opinion.

      Odd that. I think the Compaq I use at work is too damn bright. I prefer dimmer monitors. For that matter I really hate the black on white, like on typing paper, scheme which I think contributes to my migrain headaches.)

      Dimmer may be a way to conserve power. Do Powerbooks have issues with power consumption? How do they rate?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by ReformedExCon · · Score: 1

      Could be a power management decision, but the 1997 LCD screen just looks bad, in my opinion.

      When I look at them side by side, the PC laptop screen looks brighter, clearer, like I am looking out of a clear window. The Mac laptop looks like my old 8lbs Toshiba Satellite from years back.

      Other than that, though, I don't really have any complaints, and mostly have high praise for the devices. Still, for a "premium" product, a better screen would be nice.

      --
      Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    3. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, since there is bound to be a slew of anecdotal evidence I may as well pipe up. I'm using an older TiBook (867 Mhz). Original battery. If I set the brightness to the middle mark I am still getting 4 hours of run time. But really, no notebook battery lasts long enough in my opinion.

      By the way, I really hate laptops with the smooth, shiny monitor glass/covering. The reflections are completely distracting.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    4. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Kingsly · · Score: 1

      5-6 hours of battery life on 12-inch models.

      Even the 14-15" x86 notebooks don't come close.

    5. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Informative

      The latest 15" and 17" Powerbooks supposedly use a brighter screen and are offered in higher resolutions than previous models.

      My current issue with Powerbooks is that they are still hobbled with a very slow front side bus, about a third that of a Pentium-M, with a much smaller cache to boot, 512k vs 1 or 2megs. I don't know how fast the bus on the Turion64 is, but I think those might be faster still.

    6. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I prefer separate night lamp. And one that isn't directed into my eyes.

      Also, I can't wait the times when completelly passive e-paper based displays will start to be used in laptops.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but my Thinkpad T40 (14 inch screen) matches your portables run times under load while retaining the dvd burner. If I remove the drive and add a battery in it's place, I can get almost eight hours of solid useage out of it.

    8. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by ocp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Powerbooks adjust the brightness of the screen to the available light in the user's environment. The screen can be quite dim in a poorly lit room, which results in less fatigue and less stress on your eyes when you look somewhere else besides the screen (your eyes do not need to adjust back and forth to the different lighting levels).

      At least for me, brighter is not better. I have both types of laptops at home (private and work), and once you get used to the automatic dimming of the powerbook, the windows one feels like working with a desk lamp lighting directly onto your face.

    9. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Powerbooks adjust the brightness of the screen to the available light in the user's environment...

      At least for me, brighter is not better.


      I've got a better idea. Let the user choose what brightness level they like.

    10. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by jcr · · Score: 1

      It's a great deal brighter. Try looking at it side-by-side with the previous generation.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1997 LCD screen just looks bad

      The Mac laptop looks like my old 8lbs Toshiba Satellite from years back.

      Err..... maybe that's because 1997 was 8 years ago? Ya think?

    12. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can deal with the dim screen. I suppose I could even get used to the track pad, versus the pencil eraser thing I prefer now. But until they put TWO BUTTONS on the PowerBooks, the editors, artists, and poets can keep 'em. Common Apple -- you released a two button mouse... now fix the laptops!

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    13. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by ocp · · Score: 1

      You can, of course, disable that automatic feature and adjust the brightness manually.

    14. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by goaty_the_flying_sho · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no shit. I like my thinkpad becasue if it's too bright, I turn it down.

      Would you use a computer that adjusted its volume according to ambient noise?

    15. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Would you use a computer that adjusted its volume according to ambient noise?

      That would be a cool feature! I certainly would.

    16. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by ocp · · Score: 1

      Just like car audio systems have the feature to increase automatically the volume with increasing speed to compensate for the engine and wind noise. And by the way, all these features can be turned off.

    17. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by eMartin · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the latest models, and even if we're to take your word for it that they are bright now, they have been pretty dim for a very long time.

      My mother's Powerbook G4 can barely be used near a window during the day, but my father's Thinkpad looks great in any light. Next to each other, the difference is night and day.

    18. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is this such a problem? 99% of the time a single normal click is all that is required. The rare times you need an alternate click its an easy outstretch finger in addition to the normal click and can easily be done with one hand. The wear on my trackpad button is actually most prominent just to the right of centre. If there were two buttons there of equal size I'd be contorting my (right) hand into a less natural position, so I prefer the single button. That, and any OS/app that needs to use the right button a lot is not designed properly.

    19. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1, Informative

      What a simple minded comment. In practice you don't even realise it adjusts the brightness. Plus you can turn the feature off in System Prefs or adjust the brightness yourself with the three buttons on the keyboard (which also act as F8, F9, F10). Its these useful everyday features that show Apple designs their products for users and not just adding stupid preschool interfaces like XP.

    20. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by holy+zarquon's+singi · · Score: 3, Funny
      I could even get used to the track pad, versus the pencil eraser thing I prefer now.

      I think the pencil eraser thing you refer to should be referred to as a "clitoris".

      --
      "...we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that." B.Spears 2003
    21. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and you could fit a pretty big battery in a powerbook with twice the thickness (equivalent to your Thinkpad).

    22. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by pboulang · · Score: 1

      no no, what are you thinking? The pencil eraser thing totally exists...

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    23. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my 12" has trouble with bright light... especially daylight. The screen is the weakest part of the computer, which is too bad. It is bad even in comparison to the 15" (including the old TiBook).

    24. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by goldseries · · Score: 1

      The newest powerbooks do have a brighter screen with higher resolution http://www.apple.com/powerbook/ the previous generation screen is also pretty bright. I have never had a problem with the screen and it automatically dims in darker light so you don't have to stare at a bright screen.

      --
      Great webhosting, cheap rates! Enter code SlashdotDiscount
    25. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by skingers6894 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's funny you should say that. I've read this opinion a few times on slashdot of late. Yet here I am with my 17" Powerbook and the brightness setting is just over halfway. This means the 'book has almost twice the brightness I need. If other brand notebooks make the PB look dim I guess I'd have to wear sunglasses to use those!

    26. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just brightness, it's also clarity and sharpness. If you're satisfied with the way old LCD monitors looked, with their drab and flat colors on a matte screen, that's great. Macs are for you. But if you want a crystal clear display that looks beautiful, Apple laptops do not yet support those.

    27. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by fatrat · · Score: 1


      I used to think this, being a unix guy, but now I've actually got one, the only time I find it an issue is when using rdesktop to manage windows servers. Even then, it's dealable with.

    28. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by stephentyrone · · Score: 1

      sure they do. powerbooks have DVI-out. and a reasonably good graphics card to run it. i have mine plugged into a 24" dell LCD.

    29. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      Its these useful everyday features that show Apple designs their products for users and not just adding stupid preschool interfaces like XP.

      Apple did not invent this feature, and plenty of non-Apple laptops had it earlier than that.

      There are also many features you get on other laptops that Apple thoughtlessly leaves out. Like a second mouse button, a built-in camera (like on the new iMac), and separate fn and Fxx keys.

      The Powerbooks are among the nicer laptops out there, but just because a feature eventually makes it into a Powerbook does not mean that Apple invented it.

    30. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by KlaymenDK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a problem because it needs that extra finger. I know it sounds like a small thing, but are you aware of the number of mouse clicks that go into an average work week? A lot.

      For instance, when I read an online article, being able to load links in background tabs is a godsend. I do that using a middle click. Or, I highlight the occasional word and right click to call up a dictionary.

      Had I only one mouse button, your argument is that I could simply use one extra finger to hit Command or Option. But that finger has got to be attached to the hand not holding the mouse, and thus it's more inconvenient.

      Now that Apple have introduced multi-button support in their OS, we can use them. But on the laptop itself we still have only one button (and as far as I have experienced in shops, the pointer surface doesn't even have hotspots for scrolling - but I could (hopefully) be wrong). I guess if someone would give me an Apple laptop, I'd install some form of mouse gesture utility.

      DISCLAIMER: In the olden days I was a Mac guy, I've had everything from the original Mac to a Colour Classic. After that, Windows (and more recently, KDE) has spoiled me.

    31. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yeah, and you could fit a pretty big battery in a powerbook with twice the thickness (equivalent to your Thinkpad).

      The ThinkPad T40 is 26.6mm thick, which is 1mm thinner than the 15" PB and 1mm thicker than the 17" PB.

    32. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by mjg59 · · Score: 1

      The T-series Thinkpads are 1.2 inches thick. The 12" powerbook is (according to Apple) 1.18 inches thick, with the 15" one at 1.1 inches. So, uh, no. The older T30 was quite a bit thicker, though.

      (When new, my X40 would happily do 7 hours or so on a charge. Of course, that's an ultraportable without an optical drive, but it's also about 2 pounds lighter than a 12" powerbook. The basic moral here is that Apple's hardware is well-designed and fairly good value for money, but it's not magic. Other high-end laptop vendors have hardware that is comparable or better than Apple's, though you tend to pay more money for the better stuff.)

    33. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by shmlco · · Score: 2, Informative
      Let's see, this 15" Powerbook has 2GB ram, a 120GB HD, 1.67 PPC G4 processor, 128MB ATI Radion 9700 video chip running a 1440x960 screen, 802.11g, Slot-load 8x SuperDrive (DVD+R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW), gigabit ethernet, USB 2.0 and FireWire 400 & 800, built-in speakers, built-in microphone, DVI-I and SVGA-out, and Bluetooth 2.0+EDR. And that's not counting the software shipped with it.

      Funny, but it seems to me that most other notebooks are the ones missing the features...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    34. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by shmlco · · Score: 1

      The new laptops support scrolling gestures. Just drag two fingers instead of one.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    35. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So does my Powerbook. Those are pretty standard specs these days--nothing to write home about. And in terms of software, many laptops come at least with as much software included as Powerbooks

      And in some areas the Powerbooks fall short, most notably CPU performance and battery life. And while a Mac-only user might not notice it, the pointing device and keyboard are pretty mediocre designs (and, worse yet, you don't get a choice--if you want a Powerbook, you are stuck with Apple's design).

      As I was saying: the Powerbooks are great looking and they are, overall, capable, well-designed laptops at reasonable prices. I do recommend them. But they are not cutting-edge or particularly innovative. In fact, until Apple starts shipping x86-based laptops, they simply won't be able to match the performance of other laptops.

    36. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Insensitive_Claudio · · Score: 1

      Size mattereth not... well a little.

      What I can't stand is paying $1100 for a 14" iBook with a ton of gfx memory and still being limited to 1024x768 video!!! That is a false limitation.

    37. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by chrish · · Score: 1

      So hook it up to a monitor. There's a hack you can download (Google for it) that'll let you use both displays at once, too.

      That GFX memory can also be used by OpenGL apps and games, so it's not like it's wasted. I suspect Quartz Extreme also uses some of it for window backing store, so you're always using more than 4MB of video RAM, even at 1024x768.

      --
      - chrish
    38. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now that Apple have introduced multi-button support in their OS, we can use them.

      Did someone recently uncomment the mod_troll line in your httpd.conf file? =P (Support for multi button mice is not recent. I'm not sure but, but I think it's been around at least ten years. Come on, man! Are we going to get the kottke troll next?)

      However, your point about the PB lacking a second button is valid. Until Apple rectifies this (if they ever do), I suggest looking at Sidetrack, a utility/pref pane that will give you the functionality that you desire.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    39. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      For instance, when I read an online article, being able to load links in background tabs is a godsend. I do that using a middle click. Or, I highlight the occasional word and right click to call up a dictionary.

      Well, yes, but at other times I want to open them in a background window, or in a foreground tab. There are just too damn few buttons on a mouse to do what you can do with one mouse button and modifier keys.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    40. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

      I agree. When I use my laptop at home I am fine (unless I am near a window, or it's sunny at all :( ) but when I am in a school or work, where it's bright, I can barely see the screen.

    41. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by John+Muir · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the same thing with white on black...

      But on this PowerBook I press Command+Control+Option+8 and it switches to negative colour mode! Perfect for low light levels when you just can't crank the white down low enough.

      I seriously recommend a Mac for anyone with eyestrain. The OS has features like that and a competent zoom built in so that all programs support them, and they're available by keypresses.

    42. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by John+Muir · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! Until then, I use negative colour mode when white gets too bright.

    43. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by John+Muir · · Score: 1

      I'm using this PowerBook right now next to a big window of daylight ... (12" model from 2003)

      Another trick is to turn the backlight off entirely and read the screen in direct sunlight like a piece of paper ... not practical most of the time but great for extending battery power when somewhere sunny on holiday!

    44. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by John+Muir · · Score: 1

      Yes, the PowerBook is the number one reason for the Intel switch. And I like every Mac user out there am hoping for some seriously fast models in 2006.

      The PowerBook is great all round with only the ageing processor and one-Apple-design-fits-all keyboard and mouse ... which I find fine but I know not everyone can be expected to.

      Certainly my old 867mhz PowerBook has done me proud so far and will continue to until I get my hands on something 64bit, ultra-light, solid state storage based and also made by Apple!

    45. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by John+Muir · · Score: 1

      I do a fair bit of VNC with non-Macs via my PowerBook and know what you're talking about.

      The Mighty Mouse I have sitting on my desk is a neat solution for the desktop. Now I'm hoping for (and expecting...) a similar sneaky design with the next PowerBook's trackpad button. One button, two click modes. Come on Apple, do it again!

    46. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by John+Muir · · Score: 1

      Ever tried FrontRow?
      (Sure it can work on a non-iMac if you have the patch!)
      Ever seen the way it zooms out away from the desktop while changing to the menu mode?
      (This looks even better if you hold down shift of course)

      Apple clearly have virtual resolutions implemented to some extent ... expose uses them too when you have your windows shrunk and moved to browse them all at once ... so what this 12" PowerBook user wants to see in Leopard is virtual res coming to the whole desktop environment so we can res switch and have things mapped to our 1024x768 displays!

      Of course, knowing Apple any such thing will be for new Macs only. But where there's a will, there's a patch...

      Try this out - take a screenshot (shift+command+3) of the desktop on a higher res, on another Mac or with an external monitor. Then open the file on your 1024x768 display and see what it's like scaled down and antialiased. Sweet that's what! I'd love to be able to use that for real.

    47. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Refrag · · Score: 1

      Command & Shift modifiers for clicks (in Safari and Firefox) work much better than clicking a different mouse button for each unique outcome.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    48. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We are talking about laptops here, and for the most part you use your thumb to operate both (or all three) buttons on a trackpad/point. This means you have to feel your way to the correct one, or even look (I use a PowerBook and a ThinkPad, by the way, so I am familiar with both). In contrast, you have a finger near the control key all of the time you are using the keyboard. The only time when a multi-button trackpad is preferable is if you are left-handed, and that is because of a brain-dead decision by Apple to have a single control key on the left hand side, making it inaccessible if you are using the trackpad with your left hand.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    49. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      "Support for multi button mice is not recent. I'm not sure but, but I think it's been around at least ten years."

      Um, I admit that I haven't had my Macs powered on for some time, but none of them knew of more than one button -- none. In other words, this feature is newer than System 7.3, at least. Could one attach a multi-button mouse to a Quadra, or a PowerMac? I'm sincerely asking, because I honestly don't know that you can -- just that I've never seen one.

      What a "kottke troll" is, I have no idea.

    50. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Insensitive_Claudio · · Score: 1

      That really reminds me of HAM (hold and modify) mode on the Commodore Amiga/video Toaster. I really got used to scrolling around in virtual rez mode. I came across a similar situation about 3 years ago when I botched an X11 configuration. I wasn't as happy about it then

    51. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by broohaha · · Score: 1


      My mother's Powerbook G4 can barely be used near a window during the day, but my father's Thinkpad looks great in any light. Next to each other, the difference is night and day.


      How old is the Powerbook? I bought mine in 2001 weeks after the original Rev. A Powerbooks were released. I remember the screen to be very bright and beautiful. But over the years it has degraded considerably. I still use it regularly, but it doesn't hold a candle to any of the powerbooks that have come out since then.

    52. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Windows laptop? There's no such thing. Windows is not tied to hardware.

    53. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by v1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's only a button click away! In the Displays system preference, do a colorsync calibration. Now when it asks you for gamma, DO NOT select "mac standard gamma". Choose one of the other two options available, such as "uncorrected gamma". That will get you your gamma that you are used to seeing on windows.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    54. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1

      haaahahaha, the perfect /. troll

      way to perpetuate the stereotype brother

      --
      We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
    55. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Informative

      That has nothing to do with the hardware and everything to do with the target market of the Macintosh.

      See this link for more information, but the basic gist of it is this:

      - Sun and PC (read: "Windows") don't gamma-correct anything going to the display. The average graphics card/driver end up with a gamma factor of about 2.0 or 2.1, though.

      - The Mac has a standard correction factor of 1.8 due to hardware and display driver output. The reasoning for this is that it supposedly gives better color accuracy for print output. Being a complete know-nothing about graphics, I can't vouch for this.

      - SGI's are similar to the Mac, but use a different correction factor. (The link says 2.4. I'll take their word for it.)

      The result is that the screen on a Mac looks darker when uncorrected.

      Either that, or you're just looking at someone's screen in power-save mode. Auto-dim is how Apple achieves those "amazing" battery life numbers. Remember, kids, Powerbooks are made in the same factories as Vaios and Inspirons. They're just made to Apple's spec instead of Sony's or Dell's.

    56. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      Complete resolution independence is coming to Leopard. The fundamentals are already beginning to be implemented in Tiger. And when OS X goes resolution independent, it'll be thorough, elegant, and beautiful, not half-assed like in Windows.

    57. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by xSmurfster · · Score: 1

      Yes that's totally normal, the screen will end up completely dead at one point. All LCDs, to this date, will do that. The cold cathode will not last for ever. But if your of the DIY type it is fixable (see LCD Backlight Quick Fix as featured on hackaday.com). Although this is a large LCD, dunno if part would be available for the much thinner laptop screens, but I wouldn't be surprised if they are.

    58. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Common apple"....jesus....I think your spelling is your biggest problem man. I am pretty sure you meant "Come on apple".

    59. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by BlueStraggler · · Score: 1

      Powerbooks use both displays automatically. Just plug in the monitor and you're instanly dual-heading. It's iBooks that need the hack.

    60. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm trying to overcome years and years of drug abuse and the consequent impaired memory, so bear with me.

      I remember using a kingston 2 button trackball with my centris 650, circa 1993. That would be with some version of System 7 on it.

      If I'm way off base here, please don't say, "you must be on drugs". Instead, say "you must have been on drugs". =)

      OTOH, I am absolutely certain that I was using multibutton trackballs under OS 8 and 9 with a beige desktop G3 during the later 90s.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    61. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the Kottke Troll is famous, at least here on slashdot. Watch for it's many variations!

      It's easy to spot. It starts out with the words "I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you [*] fanatics?"

      The reason I made the mod_troll joke is that . . . well, surely you're aware that this is one of the major flamewar topics in the Mac/Windows war?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    62. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by mstromb · · Score: 1

      I can't stand them either. I love my notebook, but whoever thought to put a shiny screen on something that might be used near sunlight deserves to be shot. It's almost impossible to use something with a screen like this in a car, or even next to a bright light in a room.

    63. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by John+Muir · · Score: 1

      I've been hearing about things going that direction too. To which I add "PRE-ORDER FOR OS X 10.5, HEY APPLE I GOT YOUR MONEY RIGHT HERE!!!"

    64. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by geordieboy · · Score: 1

      you want a glossy screen? Are you a masochist?

      --
      The world is everything that is the case
    65. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by toddestan · · Score: 1

      So hook it up to a monitor. There's a hack you can download (Google for it) that'll let you use both displays at once, too.

      Having to haul around a second monitor kind of defeats the purpose of getting the notebook computer in the first place, doesn't it?

      Besides, without using the hack, I'm pretty sure you would be limited to 1024x768 resolution on the second monitor anyway.

    66. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by alabamer · · Score: 1

      What does the location of the factory have to do with the quality of the laptop? The specs are what determines the quality of the product, not the factory. I've never seen a VAIO with a titanium shell. Dell and Sony laps are lacking... Unless you think a heavy plastic piece of hardware is a quality item.

      Think about it before you call people 'kids' kid.

    67. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see laptop LCDs tap transflective tech like some cell phones and PDAs.

    68. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. Very much.

      I don't know why everybody is coming up with excuses, but I too think most of Apple's displays are lacking. The displays in my girlfriend's 1yo iBook and my friend's 12in PowerBook are fucking terrible - yeah, they're crisp, but their brightness and viewing angles blow. I've got a friend with a 15in AlBook and its panel is significantly better than the two aforementioned 12in panels, but it's still not "great."

    69. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Besides, without using the hack, I'm pretty sure you would be limited to 1024x768 resolution on the second monitor anyway.

      Yup. No hack=mirroring only, so max of 1024x768.

    70. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      More people understand "oohh, pretty! shiny!" than understand "anti-glare coating" so they make what's going to sell in the side-by-side environment at Best Buy.

      I get matte finish on my photos but most people look at me funny when they see them. I also color-calibrate family monitors for them but few can/care to tell.

      I'll have a hat sandwich when Steve Jobs sells a Powerbook with a gloss finish screen.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    71. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Xyde · · Score: 1

      I have iScroll installed (on my 1ghz aluminium powerbook) and it will do a right click if you click the trackpad button while having two fingers physically on the trackpad (as opposed to the usual one for mousing around), plus the usual two finger scrolling trick the new 'books have anyway. Just as good as having two buttons, i picked it up instantly and use it all the time - the only thing you can't do is right-drag.

    72. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by steeviant · · Score: 1

      I went from a 1Ghz powerbook to the 1.5Ghz version with 5200rpm HD and a far better video card, and barely noticed any increase in performance at all.

      If I'd paid money to upgrade I would have been tempted to take it back and ask for my money back. It's depressing that a 50% increase in CPU speed and a significant increase in L2 Cache and HD speed don't translate to much of a percieved speed increase.

      It really seems like the powerbook architecture hit a wall some time ago and Apple haven't been able to overcome it in at least two upgrades.

      A word of warning to anyone thinking of upgrading their powerbook: if you have an aluminium powerbook don't bother until there are P-M based models available... unless of course you're doing it for bigger screens or some of the other wizbang doo-dads on the new models, but don't expect a performance upgrade.

    73. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by zo219 · · Score: 1

      >Remember, kids, Powerbooks are made in the same factories as Vaios and Inspirons. They're just made to Apple's spec instead >of Sony's or Dell's. . . .
      . . .thank you jesus.

    74. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      I suppose it keeps the cost down, but if there is one area that really ought not be skimped on (especially for machines meant to be used by graphic designers), the LCD monitor is it, in my opinion.

      You guys never give up eh? Let me explain something to you kid, no graphic designer uses a fucking LCD, period, not for anything that requires consistency across contrast or color. Nice try at sounding "clued-in" though. And on top of that, the problems with definition when you're off the X-Y axes is a show-stopper. Check your facts, or ask someone who has a clue.

      CRTs rule for mission critical color, contrast, etc. Period

    75. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      Plus you can turn the feature off in System Prefs or adjust the brightness yourself with the three buttons on the keyboard (which also act as F8, F9, F10)

      And besides that one can also adjust the calibration, move the white point and gamma around, whatever, using the 'Color' tab in Displays preferences.

      Windows default is a higher gamma, which usually looks like shitty definition [contrast] in darker, [i.e., shadowed] areas of a graphic. A lot of Mac graphics folks, doing web stuff, will purposely keep an alternate color profile, that's been butchered to approximate the "Windows experience", to get a 'happy' medium [pandering to the Lowest Common Denominator as far as gear and so-called 'standards' go].

    76. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      the editors, artists, and poets can keep 'em.

      ...and the rocket scientists at NASA, the bigtime research scientists at the pharmaceuticals [read: all chemistry labs], the JPL squad, and the military guys taking home notes from the modeling supercomputer at Virginia Tech, etc, etc, etc...

      What's that leave the Windows people??? Oh yeah, secretaries, point of sale cash registers, and kids playing dungeons 'n dragons bullshit, riiigghhht, the 'business' computer... ha ha ha, fuck that, buy your shit at dell wal-mart and let the serious guys use serious gear. Next.

    77. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure you would be limited to 1024x768 resolution on the second monitor anyway

      maybe on the iBooks, wouldn't know, but my year-old Aluminum Powerbook 15" supports up to 2048 x 1536 at millions of colors. And my 667 Titanium also supports many other screen sizes in spanned desktop mode.

      It's not clear, from your subject, if you're referring to a previous iBook comment, or the older, P-book topic in the subject line.

      one interesting tidbit: when I run Linux on the powerbook, the internal LCD can be made to scroll vert/horiz to huge proportions, tweaking the file...what is it? the xorg.conf? maybe, been a while, but it's eerie, the first time to just move the cursor way "off" screen, to reach the 'actual' perimeters of the 'desktop'. A fluke, but kinda cool.

    78. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      Choose one of the other two options available, such as "uncorrected gamma". That will get you your gamma that you are used to seeing on windows.

      Close...'uncorrected', you mean "native", and on the Mac, that would be a gamma of 1.91 [for the year old LCDs, maybe different for later models], versus the default Windows gamma of 2.2 [generalized, as "native', means 'native' to the monitor].

      My electron22blue, when 'spanned' with the Powerbook, shows a "Native" gamma as being set for 2.2. At the same time, the "Native" gamma for the LCD remains at 1.91, which is slightly higher than the generalized spec of 1.8, the 'so-called' Mac gamma.

    79. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by funkcicle · · Score: 1

      I never realized how truly brilliant the single-button trackpad was until I was asked to troubleshoot on somebody's Windows notebook the other day at a coffee shop..I was kind of annoyed that Windows didn't support ctrl-click.

    80. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by LKM · · Score: 1
      Now that Apple have introduced multi-button support in their OS, we can use them. But on the laptop itself we still have only one button (and as far as I have experienced in shops, the pointer surface doesn't even have hotspots for scrolling - but I could (hopefully) be wrong).

      You are. You can scroll via "gestures" on the Mac, and there are third-party applications which duplicate the "scroll zones" which some PCs have.

      But to quickly comment on the multi button issue: I hate multi button trackpads. The problem is that your hand is constanly moving while using a trackpad. So the position of the buttons moves vis-à-vis your hand. This means that I quite often hit the wrong button when using PC laptops. And most laptop manufaturers aren't happy with two buttons, they need to have at least four or five buttons, sometimes the same button several times (on top and on bottom of the pad). Please, God, no!

    81. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? My 12" PowerBook gets around 4 hours on low brightness, usually closer to 3 1/2 hours. I love the thing, but I won't pretend Apple's "5 hours" claim is true.

    82. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by spir0 · · Score: 1

      You might want to do a bit more research into this. It's nothing to do with the screens. I have LCD screens that are 'softer' on my macs than they are on my PCs. I find it easier on my eyes.

      My PowerBook is the same. I think you might find it's an intentional design feature of the GUI.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
    83. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? My 12" PowerBook gets around 4 hours on low brightness, usually closer to 3 1/2 hours. I love the thing, but I won't pretend Apple's "5 hours" claim is true.

      You can get close to 5 hours if you reduce your processor performance from the energy saver settings and don't run anything else than a text editor. Of course the screen brightness needs to be at the minimum.

    84. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by matt-fu · · Score: 1
      The only time when a multi-button trackpad is preferable is if you are left-handed, and that is because of a brain-dead decision by Apple to have a single control key on the left hand side, making it inaccessible if you are using the trackpad with your left hand.

      System Preferences -> Keyboard & Mouse -> Keyboard -> Modifier Keys

    85. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by the_humeister · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. Money determines the quality. That means more extensive QA to catch the bad ones before they go out.

    86. Re:I think PowerBooks are pretty nice by kabz · · Score: 1

      Mine will do 5 hours (just) as long as you are just reading saved HTML and not hitting the hard drive a lot. This is with minimum screen brightness. PB G4 12".

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  7. Autonomy Necessary for Creativity? by rewinn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Was the key to the strategy glancingly mentioned in the article as "...Sculley started a semiautonomous division to produce a successful portable computer"

    It seems that big chunks of autonomy are necessary to developing really high quality products that are significantly different from the main corporate line. IIRC the IBM AS/400 line was the end result of a similar process: almost a separate computer company, it is said.

    It would be interesting to test the hypothesis by comparing the failed development of the Apple Portable to the successful development of the Powerbook.

    1. Re:Autonomy Necessary for Creativity? by hayden · · Score: 1
      It seems that big chunks of autonomy are necessary to developing really high quality products that are significantly different from the main corporate line.
      The best way to develop great anything in the computing industry is to get a group of good people together, give them a goal, some constraints, enough money and stay out of their way. Most of the time this method produces something that is significantly better than average. The downside of it is that it occasionally it will produce a steaming pile of turd.

      What always seems to happens to inovative companies is that they become risk adverse and stop being willing to wear the cock ups to get the good stuff. They start implementing "process" and management oversight that removes the cock ups but also kills the inovation.

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    2. Re:Autonomy Necessary for Creativity? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      A more relevent example to most people might be the original IBM PC, which was produced in exactly the same way.

      IBM set up a separate facility in Boca Raton, Florida and gave them almost complete independence; they came up with the PC in record time.

      The speed of development was partially thanks to their operating system agreement with Microsoft and so the Dark Lord of Ubersoft gained power at the same time.

      Sadly, the head of IBM's autonomous PC division died in a plane crash and the division was folded into the greater IBM. Bye bye innovation :-(.

      Can't have everything, I guess.

      D

    3. Re:Autonomy Necessary for Creativity? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think this is the worst example imaginable for two reasons:
      1. There was nothing innovative about the IBM PC. It was built using off-the-shelf components from the lowest bidder. The project wasn't about making a good PC, it was about making a quick-to-market PC because everyone is buying these PC things and IBM only had minicomputers and mainframes to sell them. The only reason people bought them was that 'no one ever got fired for buying IBM' - they were inferior to most of their current competition.
      2. The PC lost the market for IBM. If they had produced something internally, then they could have used the same marketting to make everyone buy the thing, built it to a strong market position, and prevented clone makers getting in on the act. They would almost certainly have written the OS in-house (they did for everything else).
      The IBM PC was the product of IBM management getting caught with their pants down, not some stunning innovation.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. This is easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How? Presumably when Daddy Apple impregnated Mommy Apple.

  9. hmm.... by Skadet · · Score: 1

    I just wish they'd use a better screen. Comparing Mac laptops to Windows laptops is like night and day, literally. The Mac laptops have such dim screens compared to the laptops that are available for Windows.

    I didn't realize brightness == quality?

    That said, this new iBook I'm using right now (not mine) seems plenty bright. . . I can't imagine the higher-end PowerBook could be worse.

    1. Re:hmm.... by ReformedExCon · · Score: 1

      Whether or not "brightness == quality", the screens of Apple laptops that I've seen (I haven't seen them all, I admit) have been dimmer and less sharp than a comparable Windows laptop. In a word, the Mac laptop screens look outdated.

      Maybe these screens are actually better. But my eyes tell me differently.

      --
      Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    2. Re:hmm.... by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      I doubt they are dimmer, in full sunlight my powerbook adjusts pretty bright and enough to be useable as long as there's no sunlight directly reflecting off the screen. Also, they are usually a lower resolution that windows laptops so the sharpness argument doesn't really have much comparison either. And about those "low" resolutions, I've never really needed anything higherand I used to use 1280 x 1024 on all my windows machines. It comes down to how the OS is designed to use the available screen real estate and windows is terrible in that respect. Even KDE and Gnome don't really do it right. Maximise is the single worst interface design decision in the history of GUIs.

    3. Re:hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I didn't realize brightness == quality?

      Maybe not, but Apple is promoting increased brightness as an advantage over previous models.
      "36% more spacious and 46% brighter than the previous generation"

    4. Re:hmm.... by shmlco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Visit an Apple store and check out the lastest Powerbooks, as they've just updated the screens. I'm typing this on a new 15" Powerbook with a widescreen resolution of 1440x920 and it's absolutely gorgeous.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    5. Re:hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found it changes over time. Whenever I get a brand new machine, the brightness level changes over time. This things wear out, people.

  10. what a wordsmith by JeffSh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "After 1992 and until the disastrous 5300, Apple was the leading notebook maker."

    Man this guy is really good at confusing things. He sounds like a political writer. It would have been easier to say "For 2 years, 1993 and 1994, until the Apple Powerbook 5300 was released, Apple was the leading seller of portable computers"

    2 years? 2 years. Seriously. I had to do research to find that the powerbook 5300 was released in 1995. Taken at face value, without knowing what the 5300 is, someone could interpret Apple's position to actually have been "dominant", where it wasn't.

    Gosh. 1992. Man. The internet was barely even around! that's like stonage.

    1. Re:what a wordsmith by gatzke · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but I also remember hearing IBM made more off each Apple laptop sold than apple. The chip, the HD, and the screen were all IBM...

    2. Re:what a wordsmith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can fluff all they want about "leading this" and "innovating that" the cold hard facts still remain - Apple had their asses handed to them on a plate by MS-DOS, Oh the shame....

    3. Re:what a wordsmith by Rickler · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's because Apple just buys hardware; puts it together; makes it proprietary with their software; then sells it overpriced to Apple bigots.

      --

      The human race is artificial intelligence created using object orientated programming.
    4. Re:what a wordsmith by eMartin · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's one way to interpret it.

      I thought he was saying that Apple was the leading notebook maker for 3308 years.

      And while I'm not one of those who expects Apple to go out of business anytime soon, I'm not so sure about them still being around in the disastrous year 5300.

    5. Re:what a wordsmith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a girl not a guy. Sabah is a girl's name :P

    6. Re:what a wordsmith by darksider415 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I still have a 190, which is a 5300 with a 68K processor, and I haven't had any trouble with it. I also know people who have had great 5300s and still use them. Really, IMHO, Apple has always been better.

      --
      And they wonder why I left Windows.....
  11. much more interesting... by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 3, Funny

    birth of the P-P-P-Powerbook

    1. Re:much more interesting... by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 1

      YES... I was hoping this would pop it's head in on this post.

      --
      Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
  12. It was smaller by legomaniaboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    See, the original PowerBook was smaller than the competing portables. It set the standard for what a good notebook is. People liked the size and weight. Now most people are buying these big computers again. It's stupid! I'd much rather have my 12 inch iBook. If you want a big computer with more power, get a desktop for less that would have much better specs. One of the new G5 iMacs would be an excellent choice! It's dumb how so many companies are un-protablizing their notebooks. Come on, get back to what a notebook computers should really be like, because bigger isn't always better.

    1. Re:It was smaller by tektek · · Score: 1

      There's two types of notebooks though; the larger ones are usually considered 'desktop replacements' and I personally find them a hell of a lot easier to move around and travel with when compared to a PC case (although they are usually not as powerful as PC-case desktop computers).

    2. Re:It was smaller by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 1

      Currently typing on a dell latitude csx 12inch model ( now adays has about the same footprint as a 14inch laptop {people switched from messuring horizontal width, to diagonal}). All I can say is this is not true. I am currently shopping for a laptop for my girlfriend (after she borrowed my laptop and fell inlove with laptops). So I have been going around and looking for laptops, she has only four requirements, fairly cheap, small, has a fullsize keyboard, and uses a touchpad. Which essentialy means a 14inch laptop. Gateway doesnt sell one, dell doesnt sell one with a decent processor. Lots of places simply dont sell a 14inch laptop. Lots of companies dont care about consumers anymore, case inpoint, dell sells a laptop that is big enough for a fullsize keyboard, but instead puts large boarders on the side of the keyboard and puts a smaller KB. Personally we might end up holding out for the x86 macs , because neither of us care to try and setup flash on a ppc linux laptop. Thoguh we are not sure if we want to settle for one as it also has one major flaw. Who in there right mind creates a button so large that you can hit it with all four fingers at the same time? Some companies obviously care lots and offer a range of options, Lenevo has great ranges in laptops, and only have one problem, the nipple in the middle of the keyboard is big, and gets hit by her typing and is otherwise annoying. Pretty much inconclusion ya theres small laptops and big laptops, but not really any inbetween, and yes a 15inch laptop is a big laptop.

    3. Re:It was smaller by iocat · · Score: 1
      Trust me, in daily use, the nipple -- call it a pencil eraser if you want to be PC -- is tiny, doesn't get in the way of typing, unless you are actively trying to hit the top of the B, lower-left of the H or lower right of the G, and even if you do so, and I will do now, [nothing happened] it doesn't affect the typing at all. Plus, she may finds she actually likes it. I viewed it as a minus when I bought my ThinkPad, but I eventually disabled the trackpad and use it exclusively now.

      If keyboard quality is a factor at all, ThinkPads are far and away the best possible choices. They also still make small and reasonable laptops.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    4. Re:It was smaller by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 4, Informative
      The nipple is leaps and bounds better than a touchpad in actual use. I didn't use it at first, instead using the touchpad, but I find the nipple is just so much more accurate, and it doesn't require you to move your fingers from the keyboard like the touchpad does.

      Furthermore, for extended mousing, there's nowhere for your wrist to rest when using the touchpad. I found this major flaw pretty quickly and started using my thumb on the touchpad, but the nipple just works much better.

      I've seen a lot of people with touchpad only laptops always carry around real mice because the touchpad just isn't suitable for anything more than a few seconds of use, but that really hurts the portability of the laptop. Then you need to carry the mouse with you and hope that you have a flat surface to use it on.

      Like another posted already said, the nipple never gets in the way of typing, the touchpad on the other hand did. Often times you'd be typing and the palm of your hand would slip onto the touchpad and you'd highlight all of the text you've typed and before you can stop yourself, you'll hit another key, thus erasing it all, cursing, and hitting undo. It doesn't happen anymore, as I've trained myself to rest my palms further away from the touchpad, but it's very annoying at first.

      For me, a laptop without a nipple would be rather worthless.

    5. Re:It was smaller by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Ah! But that only happened (again) after apple introduced the 17" powerbooks (or so it seems).

      In general, however, notebooks are really starting to catch up to desktops except on the high-end. If you have the choice of two moslty similar computers at mostly similar prices, and only one is portable, which one do you buy? This way, you have ONE machine (cheaper) that's pretty decent, rather than two machines, at least one of which (the very small notebook) can't possibly be particularly powerful. For most people, that's an advantage. Me? I'm hopefully going to buy the 12" iBook tomorrow :-)

    6. Re:It was smaller by aclarke · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are all sorts of portable computers available in the world because there are all sorts of people. Different people have different needs. I'm typing this on a 12" powerbook but I'm in the process of buying a 15" or 17" to replace it. How much do you travel? Is your computer mostly plugged into an external monitor on a desk, or do you use it on an airplane? How tall/strong are you? Do you need features like a PCMCIA slot? How much computing power do you need?

      As for me, I'm usually just taking my computer between my home office and my clients' offices. 80% of the time I have it plugged into an external monitor. I only need to use it on an airplane every 3-4 months but I need all the power I can get. The 12" doesn't have a PCMCIA slot, and mine's maxed out at 640MB of RAM and I need at least a gigabyte. I'm about 6'4 so carrying a larger laptop is less of a deal for me than if I was 5'4.

      What kind of computer you buy depends on what you want it for, which is why Apple makes 5 different models. And why there's more than one manufacturer.

    7. Re:It was smaller by plumby · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now most people are buying these big computers again. It's stupid! I'd much rather have my 12 inch iBook. If you want a big computer with more power, get a desktop for less that would have much better specs.

      I always find this kind of comment amusing. "I personally have no use for one, so how could anyone else need one".

      I've got a 17" laptop and 95% of its use is while sat on the sofa at home watching TV. A desktop (which I have as well) would be absolutely useless for this - the monitor would keep falling off my lap for one thing!

      The other 5% is either sat in the conservatory or out in the garden - although in both instances it's on a table, I really wouldn't fancy lugging my entire desktop PC to the bottom of the garden.

      I can understand that other people may not use their portables this way, and may be far better off with a tiny 12" one (my wife used to have one of the really small Sony Vaios, and it was great because she used to work on the train with it, so being small was pretty important), but there are many people who want to use a high spec PC with a big screen, but that they can also carry around the house with them.

    8. Re:It was smaller by prichardson · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about Windows laptops, but in Mac OS X you can set it so that the track-pad deactivates while you're typing. I don't use it because I've honestly never had the problem of highlighting text and then typing over it, but I tried it out and it works pretty well.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    9. Re:It was smaller by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've seen a lot of people with touchpad only laptops always carry around real mice because the touchpad just isn't suitable for anything more than a few seconds of use, but that really hurts the portability of the laptop. Then you need to carry the mouse with you and hope that you have a flat surface to use it on.

      Nipple, snipple. I guess your a little offtopic because PowerBooks don't and never had nipples, but rather touchpads.

      I'm typing this on a PowerBook right now. I'm lying on my couch on my back with the PowerBook on my groin area insulated by a blanky (plus its a little cold in my house). I'm using the touchpad now and well over 99% of the time that I use my PowerBook at home. The reason, portability. At work, I take my power cord, my computer, and my 3 button schroolwheel mouse and plug them all in.

      I thought I would never say this, but I have gotten used to the one button thing on Macs. Why? Because there are so many click modifiers (shift, control, Command/Apple/or Meta if you prefer), that a second button (usually control) is only one of those, and hitting the control button is no different than hitting a second mouse button. I was helping a friend with a "PC" laptop with two buttons the other day on his touchpad, and I found it difficult to use. I guess I have been successfully brainwashed, but maybe my brain needed washing.

      My biggest beef with a touchpad, is not general mousing around, its doing things like DND or selecting text or anything that is working with graphics like painting or drawing.

      However, for general use like surfing the web, and doing general point and click things, a touchpad is fine. If I need more control, or am going to be using the mouse extensively, its very worthwhile to grab the mouse out of my bag and use it. Like I said, I rarely use it at home. I have only used it when working with X, because the 3 buttons come in handy there and for playing some silly flash game that was controlled with the mouse.

    10. Re:It was smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laid down on my keyboard, gently touchpading my nipple, when a mouse ran across my pad, it bumped into my joystick, and got cheese all over my input ports... brushing it away with my palm, i sighed, as someone said "stop pointing device blame around, your nipple fettish and touchpad bigotry upsets my input device karma and takes all the joystick out of life"

    11. Re:It was smaller by slowbad · · Score: 1
      PowerBook was smaller than the competing portables. It set the standard for what a good notebook is

      It was the exact same size as the red box from OHIO ART
      Come to think of it, both revolutionary graphics units consisted of only white screens with black lines in 1992!

    12. Re:It was smaller by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

      It's funny... I've noticed the complete opposite on my various iBooks and thinkpads/dells:

      On my iBook, the trackpad is placed just right so that I can still lean my wrist on the base of the machine. When typing, OSX deactivates the trackpad. It's very accurate, and the two-finger omnidirectional-scrolling thing is nice :)
      As another poster said, as well, the one mouse button is an advantage here, as my wrist can be at a more naturally inclined angle, and wherever my thumb hits is the correct mouse button.

      On the Dell (D800), the trackpad accuracy is laughable, and the buttons have a terrible ergonomy. To get to the first button, I have to stretch, and to get to the second button, I have to curl up my thumb. Either that, or I have to move my hand, and click using my index finger (since the buttons have such a hard feel to them anyway).
      On the thinkpad and dell, the nipple is absolutely painful to use. The acceleration is atrocious. To reach a corner quickly, I have to push real hard, and when I get there, I have to move really slow to catch what I want to click. I can't use the nipple more than 15 minutes without getting severe wrist cramps. The buttons on the thinkpad are easier to thumb-click, but they still need to go too far down to register.

      Overall, I've found I'm much more comfortable using a mouse with the dell and thinkpad. I've also found that, even though it's connected at times, I rarely ever reach for the mouse on my iBook. My two hands are always near the keyboard, as I use many shortcuts, so control-clicking isn't a big deal. I save much more time control-space'ing my way to launching applications using Quicksilver or command-spacing for finding files through Spotlight.

      All this to say that you can't say that the nipple system is clearly superior. Obviously it's a question of personal taste. I tend to agree with you that the non-apple laptops I've used suffered from bad trackpad implementations, but I'm sure one brand somewhere uses the same pad as Apple did (before they designed their own).

      However, I still miss the built-in trackball of my Powerbook 150. Now _that_ was nice :)

    13. Re:It was smaller by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      However, I still miss the built-in trackball of my Powerbook 150. Now _that_ was nice :)

      Amen, brother. I had three of the PB 150s. One until I typed it to death [that nice concave keyboard effect], and then i picked up two more [one in an English OS, the other in french, working on some sgml bs in Montreal, at the time]...and the trackball...what can I say, it just slaughters these trackpads. I hate trackpads. I keep a Kensington TurboMouse Pro in the bag with the Aluminum, and it is always in use

  13. The 5300 made my gf a mac hater for life by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    She went to college in 1996 and got the 5300 on super sale. Hmm wonder why?

    The keyboard is missing lots of keys on it and the software is very unstable. She had alot of nerdy friends in college so I assumed they bad mouthed the mac to her like most geeks did back then. But she went on and on about problems with it and slow performance. Yes I know about the macOS upgrade and suggested it but she didn't want to hear it. She used it for one year before she left it in the closet and gave it to her mother when she decided to go back to school herself.

    Today my gf is a photographer and even though her colleagues uses macs she is persistant on using photoshop with windows as a result. Amazing what one bad product experience can do. I bought an ipod a few months ago and she didn't like it because it had the apple brand on it. I educated her that is ran on windows and now she is somewhat considering purchasing one.

    I suppose every company has its lemons. I heard stories of a few bad honda's as well even though they make one of the most reliable cars on the market.

    But the 5300 was like a castrated emachine of its time and not something you think about when you think of apple.

    1. Re:The 5300 made my gf a mac hater for life by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Same with the Apple II people before you...

      I personally have an iPod only because it was shoved onto me as a gift, but the scars of Apple mismanagement such as blatant, forced obolescence never goes away.

  14. For the sake of the discussion... by lpangelrob · · Score: 1, Funny
    For the sake of the discussion and potential insightful commentary, what was the 5300 and why was it a "disaster"?

    I was 14 when it was released. I didn't get my first real computer 'til 1995...

    Thanks.

    1. Re:For the sake of the discussion... by Televisor · · Score: 0

      It had exploding batteries, prompting a hasty recall and a big loss of face for Apple.

    2. Re:For the sake of the discussion... by inputsprocket · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Apple 5300

      From wikipedia:
      The 5300 series is widely considered Apple's worst product of the 1995-1996 time period where the company teetered on the brink of death. In its 5300ce incarnation with a TFT of 800x600 pixels, a 117 MHz PPC, 32 MB on-board RAM and hot-swappable drive bay, the 5300ce was quite ahead of other laptop models at the time, but by far failed to meet the quality standard expected for the price. Many models shipped dead on arrival, and a few 5300's used at Apple actually burst into flames due to problems with then-new Lithium Ion batteries made by Sony (earning the 5300 the nickname "Hindenbook", after the Hindenburg disaster). While no consumer models suffered this fate, Apple was forced to recall the entire product line and delay its availability while they downgraded to proven nickel metal hydride batteries. Apple's much-publicized PowerBook 5300 product placement in the film Mission Impossible turned to disaster when the PowerBooks still hadn't arrived in stores when the movie premiered in theaters. After Apple offered an Extended Repair Program, the series turned into a remarkably attractive machine, but never lost its reputation.
    3. Re:For the sake of the discussion... by Graymalkin · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Powerbook 5300 was the first model of Powerbook released with a PowerPC processor. Up until then the Powerbooks had used 68k chips that Classic Macs used (Macs before the PowerMac line). They were very powerful laptops but also pretty expensive, the fully loaded 5300ce 32/1.1GB model sold for $6,800. There's a lot of factors that contributed to the "disaster" moniker. The first was that a number of units shipped were simply DOA and had to be swapped out. There were also problems with the case and mouse button, problems shared with the Powerbook 190 which was the 5300's 68k powered sibling.

      There were also qute a few problems with the 5300's Li-ion batteries. Due to Sony's manufacturing error the batteries would short and there were a couple reports of them actually catching on fire. Switching the Li-ion batteries out for NiMH ones solved the problem but seriously reduced the 5300's battery life. This was coupled with power supplies that couldn't power all of the expansion bays was quite a mess.

      Performance wise the 5300 was very unimpressive. It used a 603e PowerPC chip but they didn't bother sticking an L2 cache on the machine. The clock speed wuld have been alright with a decent sized L2 cache but as it stood the machine was dog slow in most apps.

      The Powerbook 5300 was responsible for many of the Apple build quality memes of the mid-90s.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    4. Re:For the sake of the discussion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 5300 was a disaster because the 'books blew up.

      Not really, no 5300 ever blew up in the hands of the users, but a few cought fire in Apple's lab, vhich made Apple recall all batteries from all 5300s released.
      The PR was handed badly, and when the usual mac-bashers cought the info about this, the 5300 became known as a life hazard. (named everything from FireBook, to NukeBook)
      The 5300 was accually a decent computer, and the first portable to have swappable bay, so that you could exchange a CD-drive for a battery, a 3.5" disk drive and so on... peretty handy. And it had a trackpad instead of the track ball...

    5. Re:For the sake of the discussion... by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      I have one of those :D I have only one problem finding a god forsaken 24V 1.87A DC transformer that i can use for the damn thing since i picked it up second hand damn cheap and never had the damn ac adapter!

      Anyone got one lying around :P i want to get this thing working And add it to my set of computational anachronisms. Like my Genuine... Get this :P fished from a dumpster, Apple Powerbook 170 (unfortunatly no longer working and ac adapter now lost :(, PARTS WELCOME ! )

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    6. Re:For the sake of the discussion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PowerBook 500 series could be upgraded from the 68040 to the PPC 603e by swapping the processor daughtercard. The 500's never shipped with the 603e daughtercard and few people bothered to buy it. The fact that the 500's never shipped with the 603e was rumored to have been a political move by the 5300 team to help clear the way for the 5300. There was also a PowerBook 500 version with a larger 10.5" screen but this was only released in Japan, probably for the same reason as above.

    7. Re:For the sake of the discussion... by DJSpray · · Score: 1

      The 5300 was the only PowerBook I ever used (and I've used all of them) that started smoking within 10 minutes of opening the box. It had swappable drive bays; I tried to put in the CD-ROM drive, a "bzzt!" was heard and a curl of black smoke came pouring out, and it was defunct. Not impressive.

      My favorite model was actually the PowerBook Duo 250. Grayscale screen, exceptionally small and light, and long battery life. I used this as my primary development machine for years, doing a lot of Newton development work on it. I think there is still a possible market for an ultra-light dockable portable with no built-in drives. At the time, having a crips grayscale screen was a big cost savings over the color 270.

  15. Trackball Position? by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The most striking difference between the PowerBooks and the PC portables was the presence of a built-in trackball and its position on the case. Other manufacturers included trackballs (or other pointing devices), but they were often placed in awkward positions.

    I'll call BS on that!

    I'll admit it is somewhat a matter of personal preference, but I liked having a trackball on the right-side of the unit much more than in the center of the unit. Being near the edge of the unit allows you to bend your hand around it, making it almost feel like a normal thumb-operated trackball.

    The center-mounted trackball necessitated the same terrible hand contortions you're familiar with due to notebook touchpads. I can certainly imagine it was a real pain for left-handed users, but you can't always make everything ambidexterous, and comfortable.

    I'd pay thousands of dollars if I could get a modern notebook with a fairly normal keyboard and side-mounted trackball, like I had on my old 20MHz Compaq notebook.

    Sometimes progress, isn't... :-(
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Trackball Position? by torpedobird · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...unless you were left handed

    2. Re:Trackball Position? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly, how do you "call" BS?

      secondly, exceptions happen, you're one. Deal.

    3. Re:Trackball Position? by courtarro · · Score: 1

      The center-mounted trackball (or trackpad on most modern laptops) doesn't just allow for ambidexterity, but that also puts it out of the way of the hands when typing. Yes, I agree that an off-center trackball/pad would be easier to use when moving the mouse, but when you start typing it's going to get in the way quickly. As far as I'm concerned, these days, it's just for emergencies anyway. If you're sitting for more than 10 minutes and have a flat surface, it pays to break out the USB mouse.

    4. Re:Trackball Position? by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      You can't always make everything ambidexterous, and comfortable.

      Why not?

      Can someone explain to me how this is insightful?

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    5. Re:Trackball Position? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Sometimes symmetrical isn't comfortable.

    6. Re:Trackball Position? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Symmetric is already an adjective you freaks.

    7. Re:Trackball Position? by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      "I'd pay thousands of dollars if I could get a modern notebook with a fairly normal keyboard and side-mounted trackball, like I had on my old 20MHz Compaq notebook."

      I'm pretty sure you can still get a Mac Portable in excellent condition, and it might well cost you a fat wad. But modern? Well yes, compared to an older machine...

    8. Re:Trackball Position? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Why not?

      Because if you hold your hand up you'll notice that it isn't symmetrical.

      I've yet to find a symmetrical glove that's comfortable. Two different ones, one optimized for your right hand and one for the left, seem preferable.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    9. Re:Trackball Position? by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll admit it is somewhat a matter of personal preference, but I liked having a trackball on the right-side of the unit much more than in the center of the unit. Being near the edge of the unit allows you to bend your hand around it, making it almost feel like a normal thumb-operated trackball.

      It's not just a question of preference: in general, the center mounted trackball under the space bar tests out well in usability tests, better than side-mounted trackballs or trackpads.

      There may have been specific problems on specific laptop models, but in general, it's a good design.

      (The decision to go with trackpads was probably motivated not by usability, but by cost, styling, and size: trackpads are cheap, trouble-free, don't break the line of the design, and don't require much space inside the case.)

      The center-mounted trackball necessitated the same terrible hand contortions you're familiar with due to notebook touchpads.

      If the trackball is right under the spacebar, you don't contort your hands at all, you just move them down a little. Some of them are designed to be used with thumbs, others, with your index fingers, and some can be used either way. If you try to use one of those pointing devices in a way different from the way it was intended to be used, the result may have been frustrating, however.

    10. Re:Trackball Position? by hayden · · Score: 1

      Or a touch typist.

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    11. Re:Trackball Position? by ortholattice · · Score: 1
      IMO the best useability feature of the PowerBook trackball was the fact that there was a mouse button was directly below the keyboard, so you could click without lifting your fingers from the keyboard. I could type/select/cut/paste/type incredibly fast in BBEdit on my PowerBook 140, all without losing my finger position on the keyboard.

      The current trend on PC laptops is to have the buttons below the touchpad, so instead of being immediately accessible under your thumb, you have to lift your hands from the keyboard and reach way down. Then, after clicking, you have to move your hands back up to the keyboard and resync your index fingers to the little F-J indentations before you can continue typing. Do the people who design these things have a brain, or any consideration for usability? They can't even steal good ideas.

    12. Re:Trackball Position? by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      You don't even need a flat surface if you have a small USB mouse, mine is small enough to be used on the palmrest area even on my 12" iBook... I also prefer it because it has 2 buttons and a scroller...

    13. Re:Trackball Position? by Rxke · · Score: 1

      Not neccesary. I'm 100% lefthanded except for... using a mouse or trackball. I've seen several lefthanders acting the same, I often wonder about that. The nice thing about this is, I can scroll, click-through etc, while jotting down things with my 'writing-hand', not that superbig an advantage, but sometimes quite handy. OTOH, I use joysticks lefthanded :s

    14. Re:Trackball Position? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      So it's Apple's fault that notebooks don't come with a trackball on each side?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    15. Re:Trackball Position? by gwhenning · · Score: 1

      But, if you want to use your thumb, why not put it in the middle? That's where BOTH of your thumbs are when in typing position!!!

    16. Re:Trackball Position? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The center mounted trackpad doesn't allow for left handed use if you are Apple. Bringing up a context menu requires a control-click. How many control buttons are there on Apple's laptop keyboards? One. Where is it? On the left. The only way you can control-click while using a trackpad with your left hand is by crossing your hands in a very uncomfortable way.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re:Trackball Position? by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Me too. Very few lefties actually use their pointing device with the left hand.

      And yeah, being able to use the mouse while having your dominant hand available for something else is good. I laugh everytime I see someone get his hand off his/her mouse to write something.

    18. Re:Trackball Position? by Rxke · · Score: 1

      "And yeah, being able to use the mouse while having your dominant hand available for something else is good." Can't wait for the inevitable comments on this...

    19. Re:Trackball Position? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why don't they just make a slot on both sides that you can put the trackball into.

    20. Re:Trackball Position? by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Yep, that too.

    21. Re:Trackball Position? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      that also puts it out of the way of the hands when typing.

      Have you ever used one? You would have to have GIANT hands to hit the trackball while typing.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Trackball Position? by courtarro · · Score: 1

      Where? I'm making the argument that a center-mounted trackball is out of the way of your hands, and that an off-center trackball would get in the way. What is your argument?

    23. Re:Trackball Position? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      ...unless you were left handed

      They could possibly make a left-handed model as well, or lefties should learn to use the mouse with their right hand. Tell me, how exactly do you use the numpad on the right side of the keyboard?

      Not to sound insensitive, but making 99% of users miserable, so that 1% is just slightly less miserable, is very poor design.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:Trackball Position? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It's not just a question of preference: in general, the center mounted trackball under the space bar tests out well in usability tests, better than side-mounted trackballs or trackpads.

      Feel free to point-out those usability tests in question. I would like to see how one comes to that conclusion.

      If the trackball is right under the spacebar, you don't contort your hands at all, you just move them down a little. Some of them are designed to be used with thumbs, others, with your index fingers, and some can be used either way.

      No, no, no. You (and a few others) are simply not understanding what I've been talking about. You don't have to contort your hands to REACH the trackball... of course not... You have to contort your hands to actually USE the trackball.

      With a trackball on the sides, you wrap your hand around the edge of the notebook, making it a much more natural position to hold your hand. Having it in the middle means you have to hold your hand flat, with your thumb elevated moving the trackball, which is very uncomfortable. It's so uncomfortable that people generally don't use a center trackball that way, but instead have their hand floating over the trackball, with no support.

      But more than that, are issues of clicking... Just try to imagine how you are going to hold a mouse button down while dragging a window, icon, etc. As with a touchpad, you generally end up having to ball-up your hand into an awkard fist to hold the button and still use another finger to move the trackball. With the left mouse button to the left of the trackball, you have to hold your index finger on the button, while you curl your thumb under your palm so you can move the trackball at the same time. Macs, with one button, reduce that issue slightly, but not by much at all.

      If they had the mouse buttons on the right side of the trackball, it would be far easier to use. Of course, you lose the ambidexterous advantage, and you might as well move it to the right side to be even more comfortable for right-handed use.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    25. Re:Trackball Position? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      A trackball on the right (or left) side of the unit is completely out of the way of your hands. In the center, it is more likely to get in the way, particularly if you aren't a touch-typist, but possibly even then...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    26. Re:Trackball Position? by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      Feel free to point-out those usability tests in question. I would like to see how one comes to that conclusion.

      Look for usability tests on Trackpoint; they show you how the usability of pointing devices is determined.

      With a trackball on the sides, you wrap your hand around the edge of the notebook, making it a much more natural position to hold your hand. Having it in the middle means you have to hold your hand flat, with your thumb elevated moving the trackball, which is very uncomfortable

      There may be a few poorly designed trackballs out there, but in general, that's wrong. A center-mounted trackball comes in several variations, none of which requires you to "hold your hand flat".

      Some variations are operated like the trackpad, with the index finger resting on the ball and the thumb operating the buttons. Some use both hands, with the thumb of one hand operating the ball and the thumb of the other hand operating the buttons (usually, from a position close to home row), and some use the thumb to operate the track ball and the index finger to operate the mouse button. All of those can be operated from a nearly neutral hand position.

    27. Re:Trackball Position? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not to sound insensitive, but making 99% of users miserable, so that 1% is just slightly less miserable, is very poor design.

      One percent? Is that what you think the percentage of lefties is?

    28. Re:Trackball Position? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Symmetric is already an adjective you freaks.

      Well yeah, but symmetrical is not the derivative, symmetric is.

  16. luggable and immortal too by lightyear4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have an ancient powerbook 500, running an equally ancient build of debian. Its used as an nfs share and as an ssh frontend to a router's console port. It has an uptime measured in years. Luggable? ..sure, Undying? Oh yes.

  17. Apple IIc by VirtualSquid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple had no presence in the portables market prior to 1992

    Where's the historical perspective? It may come as a surprise to some, but Apple actually made computers *before* the Macintosh. The Apple IIc was compact and roughly portable; although i couldn't tell you for sure (i was a C64 hacker at the time) we all assumed the Apple IIc was a portable because we see it being used on a beach in the movie "2010". Although looking back now, one has to wonder where the battery is in that compact little case.

    1. Re:Apple IIc by SierraPete · · Score: 1

      Sorry--I was typing/referencing when you were putting yours out. The battery pack was a separate entity and was pretty heavy. Besides, I would expect it to be spelled IIc from a C64 hacker when all of us who owned one (or three eventually) know it was //c. Old school with the earlier models would have been ][e and ][+.

      I saw a C-64 luggable as well in about this era (perhaps a little later) with about a 4" color screen but I don't recall whether it had a battery pack or if it was just a luggable model to be placed on a desk somewhere with a wall outlet.

      --
      Starting next week, all passwords will be entered in Morse code
    2. Re:Apple IIc by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      The IIc didn't have a monitor attached; you had to connect it to a separate monitor. It also didn't run on batteries (or at least not as supplied by Apple - apparently third parties released very large battery packs for them).

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:Apple IIc by blincoln · · Score: 1

      There was a small monochrome flip up/down monitor available for the IIc that made it look a *lot* like the Mac Portable in TFA. The IIc in the film version of 2010 that the GP refers to has one attached.

      I remember the battery packs too.

      Back in junior high I really wanted to swipe my granddad's IIc (we had a IIe) and set it up as a portable Apple.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    4. Re:Apple IIc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The progression went:

      Apple][, ][+, //e (following the lead of the Apple///), //c, //gs.

      And scene in the movie 2010 on the beach showed a //c with a prototype LCD display panel that we'd been looking at about that time.

      At that, they faked it, since the battery needed to run the //c as a portable was about the size of the //c and display, and somewhat heavier. (IIRC, it was Lead-acid.)

  18. Bring back the POWERBOOK TRACKBALL! by wolfpaws · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Honestly, I still miss the trackballs of the 1xx Powerbooks, as well as the recessed trackballs of the Duos.

    They had the best ergonomic experience of any laptop pointing devices ever. The size and mass of the ball, the position of the buttons...Just outstanding.

  19. except the PB100 came out in 1991. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Informative

    Asahi being the Powerbook 100. It came out in October, 1991. I remember many people having Powerbooks (100,140,170) at that time.

    So Apple had part of 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, and even a lot of 1995 because the 5300 didn't come out until August and people didn't realize the PB5300 sucked immediately.

    That's enough time that the way the writer described it is reasonable. It's about 1/3rd of the total time that laptops have even existed.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:except the PB100 came out in 1991. by rbannon · · Score: 1

      Yes, I actually bought a PowerBook 100 from J&R in NYC. The best part was that it was under $1000 and typical Wintel crap at that time was selling much, much higher. I'd always found it amazing that the Wintel crowd would pay so much for technology that was clearly inferior. Now things have changed, but Wintel still lags behind. I'd still be using it, but Apple stopped making batteries and third party batteries weren't very good. Anyway, I broke down in 2000 and bought an iBook and it's still running like new, but it looks rather dated. The battery has another year to go, at least, and that's when I'll start to think about a new Apple portable.

      Click my URL above and join the free iPod nano craze.

  20. Stonage? by Compuser · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that a time period or a body condition?

    1. Re:Stonage? by game+kid · · Score: 3, Funny

      I get stonage when I sniff muh staaash, maaan. I inhale some vapor and I'm, like, *sniffs CPU* whooooa...*passes out in trailer and smashes LCD with forehead*

      *game kid does not condone the use of processor steam as a recreational drug

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Stonage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +2 Hilarious! :-)

  21. First Apple Portable--Not the Powerbook!! by SierraPete · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know I'm immediately showing my age here, but Apple's first portable computer was not the Powerbook. It was the Apple //c (circa 1983), complete with an 80 column LCD monitor, a battery pack. Reference at http://www.obsoletecomputermuseum.org/appleiic/ .

    Popular? No. It was too expensive, the LCD screen was poor, battery life was awful, and regular visits with a chiropractor for the battery pack were not out the question. But it was the first Apple "laptop."

    --
    Starting next week, all passwords will be entered in Morse code
    1. Re:First Apple Portable--Not the Powerbook!! by McCarrum · · Score: 1

      Oh. Dear. Ghod.

      How I've missed those days. We used to take this thing out in the car and use special little boxes with this baby. Man, those were heady days. /me sighs

    2. Re:First Apple Portable--Not the Powerbook!! by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      But it was the first Apple "laptop."

      FWIW, the //c was my first computer. I got it in 1984 and used it until 1994 when I got a 486dx266. I guess this may only be correlation, but my grades were much better when I had the //c vs the 486. Anyway, I would not call it a "laptop". It was a compact (hence the c) version of the Apple 2 series (mostly), and had portable capabilities as an option, but it was not really a laptop.

      I remember it was cool when I saw 2010 with the //c on the beach with the batterypack and the LCD screen. It took me 10 years to come back to Apple, but I believe that those 10 years were a weird time for them, and they have the bomb laptops, desktops, displays, iPods (I don't like them, but a few others do), their Xserves are pretty cool, and so are their RAID arrays.

      Yes, I'm typing this on my PowerBook. When I first got it, I said that it was the nicest personal computer that I have ever owned. I have an iMac G5 that is much faster, and pretty cool, but I still believe that my PowerBook is the nicest machine that I've ever owned. The number of expansion capabilities, the autoadjusting backlight in the LCD, the backlit keyboard, the feel of the keyboard, its size, its looks. It was a bit expensive, $2500, but I can't explain how much of a great machine it is.

    3. Re:First Apple Portable--Not the Powerbook!! by texaport · · Score: 1
      It was the Apple //c (circa 1983), complete with an 80 column LCD
      Popular? No. It was too expensive, the LCD screen was poor

      I couldn't pry a IIc from people's fingers until 1993 when DOS 5.0 was replaced.
      That Apple portable did everything many homes and businesses needed for those 10 years.

      As for the 80 columns and LCD shades, the $4000 Powerbook 170 had neither on its screen
      (although a 640-pixel width was a major selling point, except to the entire PC world)

      Powerbook graphic screensavers were blackline Mandelbrot fractals and line-art toasters.

  22. I was part of a focus group for the original... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for the original Powerbook model. I remember thinking "there's no way they can pull this off." Boy was I wrong!

  23. Asahi by Ours · · Score: 0

    Huuum, beeru!

    --
    "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    1. Re:Asahi by meringuoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Actually I think Sapporo and Kirin are much better Japanese beers. Asahi make some pretty pissy beers, especially their Red label (urrgrgrghhhh!) and the even worse Green label (bleuaghghhggh!)

      I like the Asahi we get in .uk - silver label, but I don't know if it's the same branding they use elsewhere. I've been told before that Sapporo is better, but I've never seen it for sale here. Never heard of Kirin at all, except as a setting for appallingly formulaic Enid Blyton adventure stories...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Asahi by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1, Informative

      Two words: Asahi Black.

      It's my favourite beer. Sadly, it stopped being sold in my area recently. Dammit.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  24. In EU Germany by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

    There's a nice equivalent to "luggable" in german, it's the "Schlepptop" (to pronounce add "sh" prefix to "laptop"), stemming from "schleppen"=="hauling", I thought some of the Blinkenlichten (wrong, BTW, it's "Blinklichter") Ubergeeks (wrong as well, the first letter should be "Ü"=="Ü") might enjoy adding it to their vocabulary :-P

  25. I Remember When These First Came Out... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...They were shown in 1991 at WWDC. I was there.

    The presentation was actually very well done, I thought--almost as good as a SteveNote. Back then, without Steve Jobs and his ego, essentially every group (desktop hardware, imaging, system software, etc.) gave a keynote on a different subject. Sculley gave the Monday keynote where he usually talked about the business side. Pretty boring stuff and Sculley wasn't that great a speaker anyway. Hell, even Bill Gates did a better presentation than Sculley (he was also there).

    So we got this keynote from some VP of "Portable Computing." He started off talking about the Macintosh Portable and how they had finally identified the market for this device.

    Cut to a shot of the space shuttle taking off.

    Yup. The Macintosh Portable was the first personal computer in space (and I can hear the HP41c fans sharpening their knives). They showed it floating around the cabin of the shuttle, as light as a feather. They even showed something that everyone had wanted to see since the first Macintosh: A disk being ejected across the room.

    Amusing.

    The VP then showed off Apple Remote Access. One odd thing about his presentation, though, was that the computer he was using had no video-out. Thus, there was a guy standing behind him with a portable camera zoomed in on the screen. But if you paid attention--and I didn't until somebody mentioned it after the presentation--you could see the the edges around the screen were dark and a Macintosh Portable was sort of a light Macintosh SE grey. So ARA was being demoed on a PowerBook--we just couldn't see the whole thing.

    Anyway, they were finally ready to unveil the replacement for the Macintosh Portable. They wheeled this table out onto the stage with a cloth covering a device. The VP whipped off the cloth to show us: A LaserWriter. Various chuckles from the audience. "Well, it's pretty portable..." the VP quipped as he tried to lift the LaserWriter (Apple LaserWriters weighed about 50 pounds). Suddenly, a disembodied voice from the booth called out: "Look in the paper tray." The VP reached into the paper tray and pulled out a PowerBook! And the audience went wild.

    Definitely one of the better Apple presentations.

    1. Re:I Remember When These First Came Out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > Yup. The Macintosh Portable was the first personal computer in space (and I can hear the HP41c fans sharpening their knives). They showed it floating around the cabin of the shuttle, as light as a feather.

      I call BS on this one. Apart for programmable scientific calculators, NASA used Gridcase 1520 '286 portables on various missions in the '80s. There's even one that's returned from a shuttle mission on display at the museum at Kennedy Space Centre.

    2. Re:I Remember When These First Came Out... by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Its hearing stories like that that make me wish there was footage of stuff like this in Archive.org

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    3. Re:I Remember When These First Came Out... by WillAdams · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the GRiD Compass was in space before ever there was a Macintosh Portable:

      http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/computer s/Ch4-6.html

      1983

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  26. iBook/Thinkpad by harryman100 · · Score: 1
    I've used a wide variety of Thinkpads (they were the standard where I used to work), and I really used to like the nipple thing, once you get used to it, it's much more useful than the trackpad. The newer thinkpads (the newest one I've played with was the T43 - I don't work there anymore) have the option to turn either of the pointing devices off, so that you can turn whichever one you don't use off. Personally I think there's no reason to turn the nipple off, I never used to find it getting in the way, however, turning the trackpad off does prevent all those annoying times where you manage to move the mouse while typing.

    fairly cheap, small, has a fullsize keyboard, and uses a touchpad.
    I have a 12" powerbook, and it has all those features. Well, I'm not sure if you'd class it as cheap really, but it certainly isn't expensive. If you wanted a cheaper one you could choose the iBook instead.

    I would suggest one of the following:
    • Wait for an intel iBook and buy the 12" version. Is the fact that they are still PPC really that much of a problem? you could wait and get a cheap PPC one shortly before/just after the intel ones come out.
    • Go for a Thinkpad, it sounds like the X series probably best fits what you want. If you're a linux person, you could even get one from emporer linux (or do it yourself)

    Currently, The thinkpads and the power/iBooks IMO are the best notebooks on the market at the moment, nothing quite matches them, ESPECIALLY in the smaller sizes. I've seen a lot of the laptops from other manufacturers and they look OK, but if I'm spending that much money on something, it's sure as hell going to have look like it's worth that much.
    --
    .sigs are for losers
  27. it's not just powerbooks by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    My Toshiba M1's dims in response to the ambient lighting, and it's been around for at least 2-3 years.

    1. Re:it's not just powerbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Asus Z71 series also have a light sensor
      It even works under linux with asus_acpi

  28. rewriting history again, eh? by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    See, the original PowerBook was smaller than the competing portables. It set the standard for what a good notebook is

    There have always been machines considerably smaller and lighter than PowerBooks throughout Apple's history. The NEC Ultralite, released in 1989, was 4.5 pounds. The Toshiba T100 was a different design, but even lighter and so successful that people swear by it even today.

    But while PowerBooks didn't "set the standard" for anything, they were nicely designed notebooks and deservedly became very popular.

    Today, it's the same thing: Powerbooks don't really set the standard for anything. There are other laptops that are lighter, have better screens, longer battery life, are faster, etc. But Powerbooks are all around nice designs that you can't really go wrong with.

    It will be nice when Apple starts releasing x86 laptops: first of all, it will mean that they can make their machines smaller and lighter, and secondly, it will mean that users won't be forced to use Mac OS X in order to use the hardware.

  29. It's a matter of preference, I hate the nipples by BShive · · Score: 1

    Personally, I've never had a problem with accidental activation of a touchpad. I have an IBM laptop with the nipple in the middle of the keyboard and I hate it, using the touchpad exclusively. The nipple is very hard on the finger that's using it since you're putting a lot of lateral stress on your joints.

    You use whatever you feel comfortable with. Many people I know lug a bluetooth or wireless mouse with the laptop because they just don't like the built in pointing devices.

    (You know, out of context this discussion could be pretty funny.)

    1. Re:It's a matter of preference, I hate the nipples by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1
      (You know, out of context this discussion could be pretty funny.)

      Thank god - I thought I had slipped into Bizarro-Slashdot.

  30. Re:idiot by shibashaba · · Score: 1

    If the lan is setup properly it should be able to securly provide access to (possibly) a limited amount of functions for untrusted devices. I could see not wanting to grant more than internet and pop3 access to untrusted machines. File shares, databases, and other things I probably wouldn't feel comfortable with.

    --
    ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
  31. Re:idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, if the LAN is setup properly it should be able to set of flashing lights and klaxons in the machine room whilst simultaneously disconnecting the offending network port at the router, whenever an untrusted device is connected, causing the network administrator(s) to burst through your office door brandishing a very big stick.

  32. Re:idiot by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    are you hiring?

  33. Just another instance. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The history of the Powerbook is just another instance, like OS X, of a narcissistic company, detracted with irrelevant issues like wether employees can keep their dog in their cubicle, having to reach outside the company to bring in innovation. Apple, for their mythological 'wunderkid' roots, is and has been just another company full of arrogant self-aggrandizing braggarts.

    Heck, they had to 'outsource' development of the Mac to a skunkworks because the regular Apple corporate culture wasn't working. The lap-busting boat anchor called the 'Portable' was a running joke until Apple hired in outsiders to build the PowerBook line.

    I still have a really nice (needs more memory, though) Powerbook 165c.

    --
    resigned
  34. Re:idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks Bill for your input. We're all glad when you take time out of your busy schedule to provide us such valuable insight into today's IT issues.

    mmm mmm FUD! Get yours today!

  35. Re:idiot by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    what's it got to do with windows? the issue is idiots advising bringing external devices into company networks and connecting them. i'd be just as pissed off if someone brought a linux laptop, or a windows laptop running a non-corporate client in. twat.

  36. Born on my PowerBook? by mtec · · Score: 1

    Why, no... no... has someone said something? Who told you this?

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  37. Outbound anyone? by WestBoca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course, the Outbound, a Mac clone that used semi-legal SE ROM chips, was the first true Mac laptop...or something to that effect. I LOVED mine, and their customer support was the absolute BEST...which may explain why they're now kaput.

    http://www.jagshouse.com/outbound.html

    and

    http://www.lowendmac.com/clones/outbound.html

  38. Thank you by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    Finally, I've found another touchpoint (the more common name for the "nipple") fan.

    My main machine is a Toshiba Tecra M3, which has both a touchpoint and a touchpad. I don't know if I'd be able to stand using a notebook without a touchpoint, and I certainly wouldn't be able to stand using it as my main machine. I use the touchpoint almost exclusively, and I only use the touchpad for three things:

    1) Scrolling (iPod-style circular scrolling is wonderful)
    2) Middle-click (the upper right corner of the touchpad is mapped to middle-click, as there's no middle button on the laptop)
    3) UT2K4 (I move with WASD, I look and turn with the touchpad)

    I'll be a bit sad when my desktop is in working condition again--I'm too used to using a touchpoint to be able to stand most desktop pointing devices (I had a Logitech TrackMan Marble Wheel, which I loved, but mine is dead, and the TMMW has been discontinued). Well, I won't be too sad--I miss the contents of my hard drives and the high-resolution dual-head setup.

    Oh, and all the names people come up with for touchpoints are funny. My best friend calls it "the keyboard clit", which has been my favourite (sadly, he doesn't like it, as he says he doesn't want to make the keyboard aroused...).

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  39. it was normal anti-Apple PR running amuck by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    people outside Apple caught wind of it and ran with the story trying to take shots at Apple's actually decent market share or portables. the name about it burning up is kind of stupid considering how many other companies actually have to recall batteries, power supplies etc from customers to replace them from overheating. just in the last year or two we heard about "risky" laptop batteries and game system power supplies out in the public. Apple caught it before they were released, so nobody outside Apple ever actually experienced the flaw.

    the machine itself had some other design bugs, but the flaming powerbook one was what people used to scare Apple customers. "the machine may set your lap on fire" sounds a lot more threatening than "this portable has a crappy hinge".

    the comment above linked to LowEndMac.com's page for the 5300. that site has a whole section dedicated to Road Apples (Macs that failed to live up to their potential). it's a pro-Apple site so it's interesting to see what they consider stinkers. they also have their Best Buys page for the best of older Apple hardware. neither of those has anything from the last few years, so keep that in mind if you only know more current Apple hardware. i think the newest stinker is from around 2000 and the last best buy is older than that.

  40. It's not the quality that matters by rnd() · · Score: 1

    It's not the quality that matters, it's what a company is willing to do when there is a problem. Apple released a dud with the 5300. That is forgivable.

    But the fact that Apple completely left customers high and dry (a six month wait before a recall was issued that didn't even fix the problems, and no option for the customer to simply return the machine for the full purchase price) is unforgivable.

    I hadn't bought another piece of Apple hardware since the 5300 until I bought an iPod shuffle. The credibility lost from leaving your customers high and dry takes a long time to make up.

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  41. "maxed out at 640MB" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every 12" PowerBook, from the first model released in January 2003 on, can accommodate at least 1,152 MB (128 MB built-in + 1 GB expansion) of RAM.

    1. Re:"maxed out at 640MB" by aclarke · · Score: 1
      http://www.lowendmac.com/pb2/12in-g4.html states that the max for the 867MHz 12" Powerbook was 640MB. This is what I read when I bought it. http://www.lowendmac.com/pb2/12-100.html says of the 1GHz 12 Powerbook, 'The 1 GHz 12" PowerBook officially supports a 1 GB upgrade for up to 1.25 GB of RAM.'

      Perhaps my powerbook could have "unofficially" had 1.25GB of RAM. I sure would have loved to know that a year or so ago, if true :-( I did read that there was some memory in Japan or something I could have used at the time but that seemed like too much hassle and then I forgot about it after that.

  42. SideTrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  43. Funny enough by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

    I'm right handed but I broke my wrist a while back (8+ months) and I had to switch to using the mouse with my left hand. After a while you get used to it ... I actually haven't switched back yet. Partially because of the stress it adds to my wrist but also because I've gotten so used to it I haven't desired to go back.

    Now writting OTOH is another matter :)

  44. It was best at everything by mlewan · · Score: 1
    They not only had excellent trackballs - everything with them was marvellous. Excellent keyboard - crisp bw screens (none of that blurry grey-scale nonsense), solid case.

    I would still have used my PB 170 today, if it only had had a way of comfortably transfer data to modern computers. This was before standard ethernet, firewire, USB and even CD-readers.

    I had plenty of space left on that 80M harddrive. I have had seven other iBooks and PowerBooks since then, most of them good, but none of them as groovy.

    1. Re:It was best at everything by ixache · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right.

      I still have one (PowerBook 100) from my student years, as dead as can be, and I can't bring myself to get rid of it.

      And the trackball was really a joy tu use, I regret it every time I have to use a modern laptop with touchpad.

      Xavier

      --
      Do I make sense? Please report if not.
  45. Introduction was amazing by chriswaco · · Score: 1

    I was at the WWDC where the PowerBooks were introduced.

    The intro was amazing. We suspected that new portables were coming, but someone brought out a LaserWriter on stage instead. Everyone was wondering what they were up to and then a voice came over the sound system, "Check the paper tray".

    The paper tray was removed to reveal a PowerBook inside. Too cool.

    I paid a ton of money - even with the developer discount - for my PowerBook 170, but it was one of those leaps in technology (Betamax, Tivo, original Mac, etc) that you only see a few times in your life. Great piece of hardware. Great Ergonomics. Every developer knew Apple would sell a ton of them even though upper management did not.

    1. Re:Introduction was amazing by slowbad · · Score: 1
      I paid a ton of money - even with the developer discount - for my PowerBook 170, but it was one of those leaps in technology

      Except for the allowable dead pixels, there was no doubt you were looking at (and holding) an elegant device.
      But compare it to a luggable 5MB SE/30 for $3000 in 1992 and I'd disagree with "great piece of hardware".

      From 1984 it took eight years to get a 68030 (386-class machine) and gain just 16 pixels (from 384 vertically).

    2. Re:Introduction was amazing by chriswaco · · Score: 1

      One of the stupidest early reviews of the PowerBook said that it would take most users several weeks to get used to the built-in trackball.

      Of course, my generation was raised on Missile Command and Centipede so for most of us it took about half a minute. I still miss the tactile feel of a trackball over a trackpad sometimes.

  46. John Sculley = Henry Ford by texaport · · Score: 1
    You can have any color PowerBook screen you want *

    * as long as it is Black & white

  47. also, lack of ethernet... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    The 520/540 had built-in ethernet and modem. But when it came out, ethernet wasn't all that common.

    The 5300 did not have built-in ethernet. But about the time it came out, ethernet became very common.

    So people had to buy PCMCIA cards with ethernet on them (often modem too). These cards were very expensive ($400 wasn't uncommon). Additionally often the drivers stunk and the cards had external dongles (which were easily lost).

    Plus, as the poster above mentioned, the speed of the 5300 was poor. It didn't run PowerPC software very fast, and the 68K emulator on the machine was an interpretive one (as opposed to dynamic recompiling) and so it ran 68K code very slowly. Most of the Mac OS was 68K code at that time!

    The 5300 stunk. PowerPC Powerbooks were not really sought after until the G3-based PB 3400 came out (which also had built-in ethernet!).

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  48. Powerbook made me switch to Intel by heroine · · Score: 1

    While Intel users were getting 300MB hard drives for $80, the Powerbook needed $250 SCSI hard drives. Powerbook RAM was super expensive, some $100 for 4 MB. The trackball never worked. It always slipped and had to be constantly cleaned. The sound could play stereo 8 bit but only record mono 8 bit.

    On the other side, the Powerbook's monochrome screen had much better contrast than other notebooks. They got a lot of mileage out of that monochrome screen, eventually doing sophisticated dithering and background tiling to make it display photo realistic images.

    That was my last notebook which could run 3 hours on battery power, without the hard drive.

    1. Re:Powerbook made me switch to Intel by Daniel+Jansen · · Score: 1

      There were 300MB laptop hard drives in 1991?

      Apple eventually abandoned SCSI for less costly IDE hard drives, but SCSI both reduced the load on the CPU and made it possible to add one or more external SCSI devices such as scanners, tape drives, external hard drives, etc.

      Circa 1991, 1MB SIMMs for my Mac Plus cost about $80 per stick. If you were able to buy 4MB for $100, you were doing better than me - and I was doing purchasing for the local ComputerLand around that time.

      Yes, the trackballs had as much tendency to 'gunk up' as the balls in the mice of that era. Still, it was the best technology at the time.

      Q: How many PC laptops had stereo sound output or any sound input in 1991? And how often did you need to record in stereo?

  49. Mea Culpa--You're right by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're right--mea culpa.

    The first e-mail from space was sent from a Macintosh Portable, but it was not the first "portable computer" in space.

    My mistake.

    Thinking about this also reminded me of another funny Portable/PowerBook story. A friend of mine's sister went out and bought a Macintosh Portable after seeing the PowerBooks. She preferred the Portable because, living in New York City, she wanted a heavy machine that would be less easy to steal. She'd had her purse snatched once or twice and could see someone coming up, giving her a shove and running off with this nice and light PowerBook.

    No one was going "run" while lugging a 25 pound Macintosh Portable.

    (I had this great mental image of some guy running up, shoving her, grabbing the portable and--wham!--he's stuck in one place like he was attached to an anchor.)

  50. must be a flashback...hows Bob Marley? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    I remember using a kingston 2 button trackball with my centris 650, circa 1993. That would be with some version of System 7 on it.

    Do you mean Kensington? I also remember 3rd party multibutton mouse from "back in the day". You had to install drivers for them to work. I think Apple added support for multibutton mice around Mac OS 8.5 or 9.

    1. Re:must be a flashback...hows Bob Marley? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Brain fart. Kensington.

      And I was wrong and you're right. You had to install drivers, i.e., drag an extension into the extension folder and perhaps a control panel to the control panel. Which reminds me of one of the things that truly sucked about Macs before OS X. Extension conflicts. Remember having to reboot with a different extension set if you had been editing video and now wanted to play a game?

      I had a tricked out mac with lots of extensions, and getting all the extensions to behave, even with a utility like conflict catcher, was a laborious and frustrating process.

      In hindsight, System 7, OS 8 and OS 9 really sucked (at least in this area), although I didn't realize it at the time, and I'd rather forget about it now. Maybe this is why I currently really love the idea of Linux, but I honestly don't have the patience. And i don't really go for the many OS X tweaks and customizations available from third parties. Yeah, they're cool, some are quite clever, but I really just want to do some work in a (mostly) pleasant computing environment. I deleted Konfabulator after maybe a week, and Dashboard Widgets seem a bit superflous to me. But like I said, I know a lot of people that do like to trick out their macs, and there is cool stuff out there.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:must be a flashback...hows Bob Marley? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Brain fart. Kensington.

      We can't have inaccuracy on Slashdot on something as important as the Kings. My Gestapo Ninja Lawyers are on their way over to confiscate your posting merit badge right now.

      And I was wrong and you're right.

      What, just because it wasn't made by Apple? Multibutton mice were available on the Mac? Check. Around System 7.x? Check. The necessity of extension dragging doesn't invalidate your recollection. Until the Mighty Mouse, Apple didn't even sell any multibutton mice, so the difference between plugging in a 3 button mouse and having it work and plugging in a 3 button mouse and having to install a driver is negligible.

  51. Control key was in the right place on the IIc! by barutanseijin · · Score: 1

    On the IIc, the control key is where Ghawd intended it to be, to the left of the A key. See it here: http://www.obsoletecomputermuseum.org/appleiic/ These days, only the Japanese Macs have the control key in the right place. Caps lock is even less useful for a script where all characters are the same size than it is for roman scripts. The iBooks and the 12" pb still have goofy ABD kbds that send release AND press signals when you hit them, making remaps difficult. To swap control and caps lock on an iBook running linux requires a kernel patch.

    1. Re:Control key was in the right place on the IIc! by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      This is what I use to put the keys in the proper place.

      Works wonders.

      BTW, what the hell is the CAPS LOCK KEY FOR? I CAN TYPE ALL OF THIS WHILE HOLDING THE SHIFT KEY AND TYPE, I HAVE NEVER NEEDED TO TYPE THIS MUCH CAPS EVER.

      But I just can type more bullshit in order to escape the lameness filter because I was yelling for a reason, you silly rabbit.

      Also, am I the only one who gets these 400 errors for "Bad Request"? Its very annoying.

  52. Oh really by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    I'm kinda looking forward to the Mac equivalents of MathCAD, Solidworks, Nastran and ADAMS.

    Oh, you didn't mean real software you meant typewriting and pretty pictures. That's nice, dear.

    1. Re:Oh really by mlewan · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I'm kinda looking forward to the Mac equivalents of MathCAD, Solidworks, Nastran and ADAMS.

      Oh, you didn't mean real software you meant typewriting and pretty pictures. That's nice, dear."

      Well, I did write "depending on your line of work". I fully realise that there is plenty of software out there that doesn't run on the Mac, and where there is no Mac equivalent. Just to mention a few in addition to your examples:

      W32.Beagle.CQ@mm W32.Secefa.A Trojan.Lodear.D Win32.Glieder.{CF, CG, CH, CI, CJ} , Bagle.{EO, EP, ES}, W32/Bagle.gen!7B14EBCA , Mitglieder.GB , Troj/BagleDl-{AF, AH, AK} , TROJ_BAGLE.AH Backdoor.Spymon Trojan.Anserin Win32.Anserin.C , Troj/Torpig-k W32.Mytob.ME@mm W32/Mytob-FS , WORM_MYTOB.MV W32.Mytob.MC@mm W97M.Toler Trojan.Danmec W32.Mogi Bloodhound.Exploit.54 SymbOS.Pbstealer.A Pbstealer.A Trojan.Goldun.H Bloodhound.Exploit.53 W32.Mytob.LZ@mm Net-Worm.Win32.Mytob.dm , W32/Mytob.gen@MM W32.Sober.X@mm CME-681, WORM_SOBER.AG , W32/Sober-{X, Z} , Win32.Sober.W , Sober.Y, W32/Sober@MM!M681 , W32/Sober.AA@mm ELF_LUPPER.C Backdoor.Naninf.B ALS.Bursted.B Backdoor.Foobot Backdoor.Tuckist W32.Sober.S@mm W32.Sober.W@mm Win32.Sober.T , W32/Sober.s@MM W32.Sober.T@mm Sober.W, W32/Sober.v@MM , WORM_SOBER.AD Backdoor.Danrit W32.Sober.V@mm CME-157, Win32.Sober.Q , W32/Sober.t@MM Trojan.Muquest SymbOS.Cardtrp.F Cardtrap.F SymbOS.Cardtrp.G Cardtrap.G Bloodhound.Exploit.52 Backdoor.Ryknos.B Troj/Stinx-F , BKDR_BREPLIBOT.D , Breplibot.C Backdoor.Ryknos CME-589, Win32.OutsBot.U , W32/Ryknos.A , Troj/Stinx-E , Ryknos.A , BKDR_BREPLIOBOT.C Trojan.Kondeli SymbOS.Doomboot.N SYMBOS_DOOMED.I SymbOS.Doomboot.M SYMBOS_DOOMED.H Trojan.Heoms Trojan.Totmau Backdoor.Haxdoor.G Trojan.Lodav.B WORM_BAGLE.BQ Trojan.Tracker Backdoor.Zagaban Trojan.Lodear.C Win32.Glieder.CE Trojan.Bankem W32.Beagle.CN@mm Bagle.EK, Email-Worm.Win32.Bagle.ek , W32/Bagle.gen , Bagle.FN , Win32.Bagle.{CW, CX, CY, CZ, DA} , WORM_BAGLE.BS , W32/Bagle-{AR, BS} W32.Monikey@mm Trojan.Lodear.B Bagle.{EB, EI, EK}, Email-Worm.Win32.Bagle.{eb, ei} , Troj/Bagle{Dl-Y, Dl-AB} , Win32.Glieder.{CC, CD} , Mitglieder.FL W32.Mytob.LO@mm W32/Mytob-FH Backdoor.Toob.A Backdoor.Ranky.V Trojan.Lodav.A Mitglieder.{FN, FM} , Troj/BagleDl-AA , Win32.Fantibag.H Trojan.Lodear W32.Lodear.A@mm, Win32.Glieder.{BZ, CA, CB} , Bagle.{EE-EG}, Email-Worm.Win32.Bagle.{ee-eg} , W32/Bagle.{dk-dm} , Mitglieder.FK , Troj/BagleDl-W , TROJ_BAGLE.AB , Email-Worm.Win32.Bagle.{ef-eg} W32.Spybot.ZIF WORM_RBOT.CMR W32.Magflag.B TROJ_DLOADER.AMC W32.Vig.C W32.Loxbot.B WORM_OPANKI.AC W32.Mytob.LM@mm WORM_MYTOB.KQ KIX.Ixlam.A Backdoor.Civcat Backdoor.Sedepex Trojan.Goldun.G,

    2. Re:Oh really by mlewan · · Score: 1
      In case someone was led to believe that a Mac is unusable for any scientific purposes, one should perhaps add the following links:

      http://www.versiontracker.com/macos/cat/mathscient ific

      http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/math_science /

      http://www.apple.com/science/

      http://www.hmug.org/Sci.php

  53. Bright or Glossy? by LKM · · Score: 1

    Do you mean "bright", or do you mean "glossy"? I don't think Mac screens are less bright (I hardly ever turn my all the way up), but they're definitely less glossy than some PC laptops' screens. Gruber at fireball.net wrote about this recently:

    And speaking of Wintel laptop displays, what is deal with the growing trend of laptop displays being treated with some sort of super-high-gloss finish? This isn't something where some laptop displays are a bit shinier than others; it's a dramatic, instantly discernible difference. During a recent trip to Fry's, the majority of the laptops they had on display had screens which were treated with this hyper-glossy finish.

    What is behind this trend? Are these screens significantly cheaper? If not, what is the appeal? Why would anyone want a screen so glossy that it's reflective? These screens quite obviously are more prone to glare from light sources, and the glossy finish would seemingly bring even more attention to smudges left behind by the ignorant mouth-breathing sort of people who touch computer displays with their fingers.

    Needless to say, the new PowerBook displays use no such coating.
  54. Great story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee that was a GREAT story!

    What are we supposed to do now - talk about it?

  55. Not "unofficially," exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the time the 12" PowerBook was introduced, the highest-capacity SO-DIMM on the market that fit the (single) RAM expansion slot was only 512 MB. Just a couple months later, though, manufacturers began producing compatible 1GB SO-DIMMs.

  56. Bad trip, man. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    I'm doing my best not to remember the whole situation with extensions pre-OS X, but it keeps coming up in different places.

    Being an old fart who so desperately wants to be hip, I'm always checking out "what the young people are up to". Well, the latest craze among some of my young friends is this thing called Firefox. I think it's a browser, whatever that means.

    And one of the coolest things about this Firefox thing is that you can install all these really great extensions, that, get this, EXTEND the capabilities of the browser. For instance, I can install a mozilla calendar extension. Now my browser is a CALENDAR!! And there's a google toolbar extension for, uh, using google tools.

    Now, remembering my previous experience with system extensions, I took the cautious approach and only installed about nine or ten of these great extensions. It's like. . . drugs? . . . candy? . . . potato chips? You can't install just one! Of course I want to control iTunes from my browser. It's become such a pain to switch applications that honestly, I'd given up listening to music. OK, so I need to install Foxytunes. Oh, and now there are so many toolbars, that I need to install a toolbar manager extension. And so on.

    I pray that Cassidy and Greene will come back from the dead with a Conflict Catcher for Firefox.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    1. Re:Bad trip, man. by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Being an old fart who so desperately wants to be hip, I'm always checking out "what the young people are up to".

      I know how you feel. I used to be with it, but then they changed what "it" was. Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's "it" seems weird and scary to me.

      --Abe.

    2. Re:Bad trip, man. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Our one saving grace is that it's more the way it is now than it's ever been.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  57. Re:PB 100. by Sithech · · Score: 1
    The "Luggable" was the first portable to include a trackball, and the Powerbook 100 and its cousins the 140 and 170 were the first laptops in the form factor that has survived.

    In 1991 all the other portables had the keyboard at the edge closes to the user. The few machines that were running the primative versions of Windows used a trackball that clipped to the side of the keyboard area and hung out on like an outrigger. They connected to the serial port by cable. If this sounds like and accident in progress, it was.

    By pushing the keyboard forward toward the display, Apple created space for the trackball and provided a wrist rest as a side effect. Good industrial design all around.