Slashdot Mirror


Diebold CEO Resigns Under Cloud

Philip K Dickhead writes "After numerous ethical lapses and much controversy, Diebold CEO, Wally O'Dell resigned to the applause of the markets. Diebold's price improved more than 5% today, as the story broke. Business Week is reporting that O'Dell is leaving for "personal reasons", although the news blog Raw Story cites board action on imminent securities fraud litigation, and legal challenges by states claiming fraudulent certification of Diebold voting machines. Latest vulnerability tests show an impossibly negligent attention to vote security and privacy." Not overly surprising, considering their recent childish antics in NC.

81 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. To invoke Office Space by wampus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Going to federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison? Hey, a guy can hope.

    1. Re:To invoke Office Space by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 2, Funny
      Were you implying that you hope you get pounded in the ass?

      No, I don't think that's what he meant. You will have to wait to lose your virginity.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    2. Re:To invoke Office Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know it's a stretch for you kids, but just once can the subject of prison come up without you all coming out with the tired old litany of lame rape jokes please? You Yanks have a fucking obsession with prison rape. Seriously, it's not funny, it's creepy, quit it.

    3. Re:To invoke Office Space by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seriously, it's not funny, it's creepy, quit it.

      It's from Office Space. He's not quoting the concept, he's quoting the movie. You really can't blame him; he's like the thousands of other people here who think that because a movie is funny, all its lines are funny, too.

      Now go find us a shrubbery.

    4. Re:To invoke Office Space by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not the stapler joke or a couple of lines that make the movie great. Office Space is a satire about the typical corporate work environment. I'd imagine a lot of slashdotters have experienced the same frustrations as the main character and share his disdain for the--in many ways backwards--corporate culture immanent in most IT work places. If you think Office Space is primarily a Romance, then you missed about 80% of the plot.

    5. Re: To invoke Office Space by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      > It's not the stapler joke or a couple of lines that make the movie great. Office Space is a satire about the typical corporate work environment.

      Kind of like Dilbert, except funny.

      > If you think Office Space is primarily a Romance, then you missed about 80% of the plot.

      Probably worse, if the "pound-me" joke makes you think of romance.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:To invoke Office Space by alienmole · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Office Space is a brilliant movie. They could completely remove Jennifer Aniston and the (quite marginal) romance aspect from the movie and it would still be brilliant. However, to appreciate its brilliance, you do have to have some experience with the environment which it satirizes. If you don't have such experience, consider yourself lucky. If you do, and you still missed the point of Office Space, report immediately for adjustment of your sense of humor.

  2. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    anyone here really trust the age of digital voting? i dont even have faith in the system when votes are done by hand, much less so in digitizing it.

    1. Re:hmm by zCyl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think many people here trust it, at least not under anything resembling current models. The major problem is that trust is so prevalent elsewhere. While vast majorities of computing experts are shouting about how dangerous electronic voting is in its current form, the general public is either unaware of the problem, or attributes the shouting to lunatic conspiracy theorists.

      I personally think you have to approach conspiracies with a supply/demand approach. When there's a demand for a conspiracy, and a means of supplying one, then inevitably someone will produce one. The rewards are so great for having a voting conspiracy that we can't do much about the demand side. So what we have to do is make sure no mechanism exists for supplying a voting conspiracy. So long as their exists such a mechanism, people will try to use it.

    2. Re:hmm by Michalson · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try Australia, or even India. Australia used fully open source voting machines with a paper trail - electronic voting entirely transparent and accountable to the voters. The voting machines where made by a private company using requirements drawn up by an indpendent body. The resulting code was then made available on the internet for full public scutany (and several bugs where found and corrected due to public involvement), and company employees where not allowed anywhere near the machines or the voting - no late "patches", no special "help" from the company on voting day.

      India went simple - in a country where many villages are only accessable by elephant or similar transportation, and where there is a huge population (the electorate alone is over 660 million, more then twice the US popultion), they chose to use voting machines with the simplest of components - no operating systems, no databases, just simple electronics designed to allow an official to release one vote at a time to a voting board (list of candidates with a button beside each one), and then close the unit (no more votes could be cast).

      E-voting isn't the problem, it's American politics. Privatized elections carried out with minimal or no government regulation will give you privatized results - not only have private e-voting companies refused to fix major flaws in their software, made untested and unapproved patches to voting machines hours before elections, but the results from those voting machines have been highly suspect - not just that e-voting districts have been the only ones that are wildly out of line with exit polls, and always in favor of the same party, but instances where outright fraud in favor of that same party is obvious - district e-voting machines reporting impossible numbers like many more votes then actual voters, and often negative votes for a non-republican candidate (i.e. Volusia County whose diebold machines recorded -16,022 votes for the democratic candidate). In Ohio the numbers got as high as -25 million votes for democratic candidates.

    3. Re:hmm by Kenshin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The recent municipal elections in Ontario used optical recognition to collect ballots. You'd fill-in the boxes next to your choices, and the ballot would be fed into something that looked like a cross between a vault and a photcopier.

      Paper trail AND electronic tallying.

      The recent Canadian federal elections just used plain old paper and pencil technology. Simple, effective, and tallied within the night.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    4. Re:hmm by Sathias · · Score: 2, Informative

      Australia used fully open source voting machines with a paper trail - electronic voting entirely transparent and accountable to the voters. I'm Australian, and every election I have voted in has been the traditional paper method. I think I might be confused with someone else.

      --
      Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
    5. Re:hmm by nihilistcanada · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I do not understand why any computer voting machines are needed? Here up in Canada we manage to have free and fair elections using nothing more sophisticated than paper and pen. This system scales as easy as any other and does not allow any system wide shenanigans at all. We run it all with dedicated non-partisan civil servants and volunteers. It is simple and works.

    6. Re:hmm by Bun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... which makes me wonder, why doesn't the USA use the same (open source, australian or indian) voting software for their elections?

      Because the Republicans couldn't then go and rig the election? *ducks*

      --
      "Anyone that has ever gotten an idea based on any of my work and done something better with it-good for you."--J.Carmack
    7. Re:hmm by swmccracken · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you've not been entirely confused. The catch is that not all of Australia is involved - this wired article talks about A.C.T. using electronic voting in the federal elections.

      (For other readers: this is only a single one of Australia's eight states and territories, and it's one of the smaller states.)

  3. Gotta log in to e-trade.. by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like a good time buy some puts on Diebold.

    Man, I wish I'd heard about this while the market was open.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Gotta log in to e-trade.. by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the shareprice went up, rendering your (fictional)put options worthless.

      Today was a blip. January $35 puts look really good. They're twenty-five cents right now, and they could easly be double that in a week.

      They Use windows and claim their systems are safe and tamperproof.

      Exactly. At some point, those pigeons will come home to roost.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  4. good riddance by the+arbiter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Boy, is this long overdue. This man bears a lot of responsibility for the current lack of confidence in the legitimacy of our elected officials and elections.

    Whether or not you believe that elections in this country were stolen, you must admit that Diebold's response to questions about the security of their machines and software have, to put it mildly, not been helpful.

    --
    Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
  5. Re:Sore losers by Dster76 · · Score: 5, Funny

    god's party is the majority of his favorite country

    Since when were Republicans touched by his noodly appendage?

  6. Oh look... by digitallystoned · · Score: 5, Funny

    another contract for Haliburton to take over.

  7. two links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    We geeks need to contribute to the open source voting software efforts!!

    There are only two very early stage projects for the US market:

    http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/

    http://www.softimp.com.au/index.php?id=evacs

    I'm trying to help out openvotingconsortium.org and am reading up on the other one which I just found out about.

    What are you doing??

  8. The customer is not always right by James+Earl+Ray+Jones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Working in the software business I can tell you customers expect the world from software but aren't willing to pay for it. The blame belongs to the customer (i.e. the government) for accepting lowest bidder contracts instead of the software developers. Sometimes paying less costs more than doing it right the first time. Your tax dollars at work, folks.

    1. Re:The customer is not always right by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or how about the CEO being close friends to Dick Cheney and a top republican supporter while his competitors supported both parties instead?

      The bush administration typically punishes those who give to the democrats and rewards those who give to the republicans. Price is irrelivant and only the lobbying effort counts to get government contracts.

    2. Re:The customer is not always right by Duhavid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And one could say that Republicans in the US are a whole lot like fascists.

      Except maybe how about both sides drop the rigidity and name calling
      and realize that both "sides" have something of value to contribute.

      Na, that would make sense. I know we cant have that.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:The customer is not always right by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks, I know what Socialism is ;)

      I meant that you hav to choose between Socialists (who want more state in the economy, and less state in private affairs) and Conservatives, who want less state in the economy (well, at least before Bush they said so) and lots of state in your private affairs, so you don't do anything they consider as wrong.

      I want more freedom in everything (i.e. less of the Dem/Rep state), I want no war, I want no stupid laws to oppress poor people, etc., which makes me some kind of Green Libertarian. At least in Germany those parties are even represented in parliament.

  9. He's served his purpose by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He delivered Ohio to Bush, as promised.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:He's served his purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bear in mind that before electronic voting, if anyone ever asked about verifiability, the response everyone gave was that the exit polls would be an indicator of malfeasance, since they had always been within a point or two of the actual results in the past. Electronic voting comes along and suddenly the exit polls varied dramatically from what the e-voting machines were reporting. Explain that one, please.

    2. Re:He's served his purpose by ivanmarsh · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:He's served his purpose by rkcallaghan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Karma burning gripe ahead ...

      Every time one of these articles is posted, some AC shit talker gets modded up for saying "where's your proof?". And everytime, someone posts Bev Harris and all the evidence that is in shocking abundance everywhere but the mainstream news. Unfortunately, for some FSM-unknown reason -- the proof poster never gets off the ground.

      Ivan, if I had mod points today they'd be yours.

      ~Rebecca

    4. Re:He's served his purpose by pthisis · · Score: 3, Informative
      If that is really what happened, I guess we are all living in the Matrix, while you guys have unplugged from it because the reality in every rational, sane person in the country thinks Bush won fair and square.


      Most polls have/had about 20% of Americans believing that incidents of fraud aided the 2004 reelection campaign. So either your statement above is inaccurate or you think at least 1/5 of Americans are irrational and insane.

      I actually don't think there was fraud, but your statement dismisses a fairly widely held minority opinion as being nonexistent.
      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    5. Re:He's served his purpose by PostItNote · · Score: 5, Informative

      It sounds like you will only accept evidence that has proven truthful in a court of law. Give us some standards of proof here - right now the preponderance of evidence is that a) the Diebold CEO was a big Bush supporter b) Diebold machines consistently err Republican that c) http://www.electiledysfunction.org/ConyersOhioHear ing_chunk_8.wmv republican organizations were actively enquiring about how they could undetectably change the vote and that d) the election results didn't match the exit polls. If you want to indictable evidence that everyone agrees upon, then you are out of luck. All that we have is evidence of either gross stupidity or maliciousness. Since we can't rule out the former, and the lack of a paper trail outrules testing whether vote switching occurred, it's circumstantial evidence forever. If you are determined to think the best of the man, then nothing anyone says will convince you otherwise.

      But since he's either too dumb to be a CEO or too evil, either way I'm gald he's gone.

    6. Re:He's served his purpose by AoT · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would say most people think about 1/5 of Americans are irrational and insane, it is just a matter of which fifth that they differ on.

    7. Re:He's served his purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you know....

      1. 80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies: Diebold and ES&S.

      http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/ 042804landes.html
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diebold

      2. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.

      http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0916-04.htm
      http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/ 042804landes.html

      3. The vice-president of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers.

      http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/private_comp any.html
      http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/ 042804landes.html

      4. The chairman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."

      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/28/sunday/m ain632436.shtml
      http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1647886

      5. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel used to be chairman of ES&S. He became Senator based on votes counted by ES&S machines.

      http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2004 /03/03_200.html
      http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/031004Fitraki s/031004fitrakis.html

      6. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, long-connected with the Bush family, was recently caught lying about his ownership of ES&S by the Senate Ethics Committee.

      http://www.blackboxvoting.com/modules.php?name=New s&file=article&sid=26
      http://www.hillnews.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx
      http://www.onlisareinsradar.com/archives/000896.ph p

      7. Senator Chuck Hagel was on a short list of George W. Bush's vice-presidential candidates.

      http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_28/b3689130.ht m
      http://theindependent.com/stories/052700/new_hagel 27.html

      8. ES&S is the largest voting machine manufacturer in the U.S. and counts almost 60% of all U.S. votes.

      http://www.essvote.com/HTML/about/about.html
      http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/ 042804landes.html

      9. Diebold's new touch screen voting machines have no paper trail of any votes. In other words, there is no way to verify that the data coming out of the machine is the same as what was legitimately put in by voters.

      http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm
      http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/041020evotestates /pfindex.html

    8. Re:He's served his purpose by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering that Ohio didn't use Diebold machines in 2004, that must have been a neat trick.

  10. 'Nuff said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The head of Diebold is also a top fundraiser for President Bush's re-election. In a recent fund-raising letter Diebold's chief executive Walden O'Dell said he is "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."

    'Nuff said.

  11. is it just me... by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..or does someone not like Diebold?

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
  12. I'm curious... by Saxophonist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many of us know from experience that lots of users cannot figure out what seem to us to be rather simple computer interfaces. And, we've probably all encountered people who will not use a computer. Many of these folks tend to be older; I know several of them.

    Now, if people in Florida in 2000 couldn't figure out the "butterfly ballot" (yes, a needlessly convoluted "interface" if you will, but not really all that tough), how do you think people are going to figure out a voting machine? Am I making too much of a leap in guessing that the same demographic (who I described above) that would have trouble with the butterfly ballot would have trouble with this too?

    I have voted on rudimentary machines a long time ago (probably 1996-ish), and it wasn't exactly rocket science. But, isn't another election debacle being set up here with a move to voting machines?

    1. Re:I'm curious... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " Many of us know from experience that lots of users cannot figure out what seem to us to be rather simple computer interfaces."

      perhaps the intefaces arn't as simple as we believe?
      Just becasue we can use them only means we've been trained, not that they are simple.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  13. This will turn out to be merely symbolic by BandwidthHog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, what a beautiful symbol it is though!

    The downside as I see it is that there’s an excellent chance that in the long run Diebold will be depicted as a good company that was badly run for a while by one bad man, but once he left, returned to goodness. This would make his resignation, ironically enough, a setback for that vanishingly small minority of us who care deeply about the legitimacy of our nation’s electoral process.

    But hey, I’d love to be wrong about this.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  14. Time for the tin foil hat? by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not generally a conspiracy theorist, but given all the contraversy over Diebold's products, and if their board of directors is aware of of said contraversy, could this just be a feel good measure to divert public attention from the real issues? So the CEO is resigning due to "personal reasons", but is the company really going to change, or is it more of a "See? The Bad Guy(TM) is gone, you can trust us now!" type deal.

  15. Out of the office by sinij · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somehow I don't think he was VOTED out of his office.

  16. Blue dye by itomato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it's good enough for fostering democracy, it ought to be good enough to maintain it!

  17. It may already be too late by pHatidic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone who knows anything about business knows the cardinal rule: A people recruit A people, B people recruit C people. The CEO of Diebold was an F person and it's likely the whole company is now filled killers, thieves, and lawyers.

  18. So, move to Delaware. by Medievalist · · Score: 4, Interesting


    We've had electronic voting booths for ages (we had incredibly complex mechanical ones until the old clockmakers that built them for us all died or retired).

    But we still haven't had any election fraud attributable to the machines.

    Basically, it's because we have so few electors our votes aren't worth stealing. :(

    1. Re:So, move to Delaware. by pz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've often heard the arguments that we should go away from the current generation of mechanical voting machines because (a) they're old and breaking down and no one understands how to repair them, and (b) they're old and breaking down and spare parts aren't available. These arguments are quickly followed by statements of how much better electronic voting would be.

      I don't believe it for a second. I'm not sure who is trying to pull a fast one (perhaps Diebold is the answer in the US), but someone is planting FUD in no uncertain way.

      Please, seriously, someone make a cogent argument that for the millions of dollars that a contract to make electronic voting machines would cost, spare parts could not be designed and manufactured de novo for these mechanical ones. Someone tell me that we couldn't make it worthwhile to train people on how to fix them with those same millions of dollars. Just because a machine no longer has someone to tend it does not mean it becomes an untrustworthy impenetrable black box -- it means we have an opportunity to educate someone, perhaps many people, to a vital and important skill. Aftermarket spare parts are still being made for air-cooled VW Beetles, often to better specs than the originals. And we can't remanufacture our current mechanical voting machines which have worked for decades? Are voting machines somehow so much more complex than car engines? Someone's trying to trick us.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  19. Re:"news blog" ? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Huh? The ad says "Anti-Bush Gifts and Gear". That doesn't strike me as a very credible news site.

    Yes, because if someone doesn't like Bush (like 2/3 of us now), then up is down, black is white, and the sky is every color except the one they say it is.

    Raw Story is well known to be a source of very early, unripe, possibly wrong information. It's raw, like the Drudge Report. But I check it all the time (rather than give hits to Drudge) because whenever a big story erupts I see it there first. It's a good site for the latest scuttlebutt. In this particular case there have been plenty of confirming sources during the past few days.

    You saw "anti-Bush gifts and gear" and assumed the site is not credible because of a bias. Credible opinions are not necessarily "balanced". It's gotten to the point where editors at major newspapers are deliberately skewing stories to make them more "balanced" to please people like you. If I see "balance" in a story anymore I have to assume I'm being lied to.

  20. Can we get a paper receipt now? by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can the impossible be done and have this machines produce a paper trail now?

    Thank the gods of real democracy this guy is gone.

    I still want him indicted though...

    --ken

    --
    Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
  21. Re:Sore losers by rscrawford · · Score: 2, Insightful

    *snort* That's rich.

    Face it. If there's any activity which is truly steeped in human sin, vanity, arrogance, and utter foolishness, it's politics. There is nothing divine about it. Why would God have anything to do with politics at all? Didn't someone once say something like, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's"?

    Be a disciple of Christ, and go out and feed the hungry, clothe the homeless, and visit the imprisoned. Christianity has everything to do with serving the poor, and nothing to do with politics.

    --
    -- The reason it's called the right wing? Irony.
  22. Re:Bad news by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 4, Funny

    God does vote!

    So does Satan.... Normally the votes negate each other.

    However last year they both voted for Bush...

    --ken

    --
    Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
  23. Probably Not by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if he's indicted, tried by a jury, found guilty and sentenced to a PMTA prison, his alleged services to the current administration would probably buy him a "Get out of Jail Free" card in the form of a presidental pardon for all crimes.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re: Probably Not by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Even if he's indicted, tried by a jury, found guilty and sentenced to a PMTA prison, his alleged services to the current administration would probably buy him a "Get out of Jail Free" card in the form of a presidental pardon for all crimes.

      Bush doesn't seem the type to expend his scarce political capital on someone who can't help him anymore.

      Hell, he has to be reminded when it's time to throw the religious right a bone.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Probably Not by Mo+Bedda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bush doesn't seem the type to expend his scarce political capital on someone who can't help him anymore.

      That is why pardons tend to be delivered as the President is leaving office, when most all political capital is gone anyway. Mr. Clinton's list included some interesting people. I'm sure Mr. Bush's will as well.

  24. Re:Sore losers by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And maybe he and numerous other candidates for other elected offices did win fair and square, but with the severe problems with these voting machines, in many cases, how will the voters ever know?

    While I'm sure there'll be plenty of partisan blows over the Diebold machines, at the end of the day this is about a company that, at the very least, was thoroughly negligent in the machines that it put out. There are serious questions not just to be answered by Diebold, but by various officials who approved these machines.

    It's rather sad that it is, to some extent, turning into a partisan battle, because one would hope that all people; politicians, voters and investigators, irregardless of their political leanings, would care more about democracy.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  25. What I don't understand is ... by Empty+Yo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why the company's machines were even used in the first place. The minute he announced his very partisan feelings on the election, his machines should have been instantly pulled as suspect. It should have been up to Diebold to prove they were secure and accurate instead of up to the public to prove that they weren't.

    --
    I'll tolerate anything except intolerance.
  26. So we ARE NOT going to be using diebold by Rooked_One · · Score: 2, Funny

    machines this time right? I mean, after all this has gone on, surely the government would find another contracter whom voting source was open, right?

  27. The basic concept is flawed. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "e-voting" concept should be ... the computer prints the ballot and that paper ballot is your vote. That ballot lists ONLY the names you chose. You read that and drop it into the ballot box.

    The computer counts the number of paper ballots it has printed for each candidate. This number can be released to the news agencies. But the real vote is the paper ballot.

    At the end of the day, the names of the voters who used that machine are counted, the paper ballots are counted and both of those are compared to the total number of votes the machine says were cast. If they don't match, there is a problem.

    In case of recount, the paper ballots are hand counted.

    A random number of machines should also be checked against the ballots cast at them.

    Multiple checks.

    1. Re:The basic concept is flawed. by zoney_ie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here in Ireland the govt. tried introduce the typical flawed e-voting (no paper trail). They got away with a trial run in a couple constituencies in one election, but the group they set up to rubber-stamp their use in the following elections came back with an unexpected (for the govt) "you've got to be joking?" We're now stuck spending millions storing the things, and the Minister responsible for wasting millions buying the things in a previous dept. is now in charge of the Dept. of Transport, spending billions each year on ill-managed road and rail projects. Still, at least we still have good old paper ballot for our Single Transferable Vote elections (even if the processing time is rather high in doing it by hand - some counts take a week or more! It makes the outcome guessing so much more fun though as each count round happens, someone is elected or eliminated, and transfers are worked out).

      I wonder would the States be interested in buying some as-new Nedap electronic voting machines from us? *grin*

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    2. Re:The basic concept is flawed. by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How's this for a completely off-the-cuff e-voting specification. It will allow for fast voting, fast counting, and a paper trail in between:

      Computerized voting booth: User inserts a blank pre-printed ballot with one line for each position or proposal. The machine confirms that the ballot is loaded correctly (perhaps a notch in one corner) and displays the setup. (Step 0: blind users are assisted in plugging in headphones and instruction on location and purpose of the controls. Controls should have braille.) User selects a language (from this point on, interface is in the selected language), and then a font size (even if headphones are present... a "blind" user may actually just have impared vision and be capable of using the device with a large enough font size). The user then sees a list of "issues" and whether a vote has been selected. The first "issue" should be the option to vote straight ticket. When the user selects an issue (controls tbd, though I'm particularly fond of "prev, next, and enter", for a total of three keys). They will see a description of that issue in the appropriate language (ie, "President of the United States" or "Proposition 1: Raise Taxes"). Propositions should start with a very minimal description for this stage in order to prevent as much bias as possible. The full text of the proposition should then be available within the system in the language it will be implemented in (translating law is difficult and can be error-prone). Finally, a list of options which the user can navigate. All such lists should include a "no vote" option so that the user can return to the issue list without recording a vote. Selecting an option returns you to the issue list. At the bottom of the issue list is the option to confirm your vote. First, if not all issues have been voted on, a message will appear to indicate that some votes have not been cast, with the default setting as "return to voting". If the user chooses "confirm votes" again, they will be given a list of issues and their selected options. The default will again be to "return to voting". When the user chooses "Voting Complete, Print Ballot", their ballot card will be printed, one issue to a line in the form

      President of the United States John Doe **** * **
      US House of Representatives Dist 142 Susie Q * ** * ***

      (ideally in columns, though width restraints may force this to occupy multiple rows. Plus, slashdot has really nerfed the ecode tag for formatting) etc. The machine resets for the next user, with no data saved. The user can then confirm that the ballot card is correct, and deposit the card in the box. If the user discovers an issue with their card, they can return it to the staff, have it destroyed, and be re-issued a blank card.

      Now, the ballot boxes are securely transferred to the voting station as was done for years and years before the evoting craze, where they are processed by two machines. One, an optical sorter which can be configured to read the *** marks on any given line, and sort the ballots appropriately. The ballots are then fed into a counter, and the tally recorded for the appropriate person. At any time, someone can examine a sorted stack of ballots to confirm that the marks do match the person voted for (flipping through the stack while watching the name should be very quick to confirm). After counting, someone can confirm that the stack fed through the counter matches the name the count is awarded to. And, if necessary, the ballots can be recounted by hand by reading the human-readable portion of the ballot.

      Design issue to confront: with preprinted ballot cards, how long does the card need to be in order to guarantee that every possible item can fit? How wide to ensure that people's names can be represented completely? Can printers be equipped to print and cut from a "roll" of cardstock (or any paper thicker than receipt paper which would never survive a mechanical sorter) to circumvent this issue? Can the printer ge

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  28. Even paper ballots are not a paper trail (by BBV) by ugmoe · · Score: 2, Informative
    Black Box Voting is complaining that Diebold has no paper trail when counting mail-in paper ballots. [Really - I am not making this up]

    http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/1303 7.html

    "New information obtained by Black Box Voting investigator Jim March shows that mail-in votes in upcoming Nov. 8 elections will lack crucial safeguards. The Diebold "GEMS defect" -- the ability for anyone with access to change vote results on the "mother ship" that tallies and controls election results -- has now been acknowledged by Diebold, but has not been mitigated in most locations, and it is worse for mail-in votes. The GEMS defect has been proven. The risks are significant. Mail-in votes are at exceptional risk because they are counted on a system that lacks protective features found on polling place machines. While the precinct-based optical scan machines made by Diebold produce a results tape, the same machines, when counting mail-in ballots, use a different program and do not store vote tallies on a memory card, nor do they produce an independent results tape. Therefore the defective GEMS program holds the only record for absentee vote totals. "

    Hey Black Box dudes - why aren't the mail-in ballots themselves a pretty good paper trail for themselves!?!?

  29. Diebold also makes ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Diebold is a major manufacturer of ATMs. If they're so terrible at security, I guess I'll think twice before inserting my ATM card into one of their machines.

  30. The problem is more than just one guy... by dtjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just getting rid of the Diebold CEO does not fix the problem because the problem is the *system* rather than just one man. It is the system that allows one company to submit voting systems for use by the public with no oversight of their accuracy and integrity and it is the system that enables corrupt elected officials to allow Diebold to do as it pleased. The next Diebold CEO might be worse than the last one. Even worse, there will likely be other diebold-like companies springing forth to provide similar voting systems. Until the American public are able to throw off their cloak of indifference, timidity and cowardice and stand up to the Diebolds in their local jurisdictions, the system will remain broken.

  31. Re:This Is Insightful??!!! by m50d · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Do you have any idea what Halliburton is and what they do?

    Nor did the people who awarded them the last round of contracts

    --
    I am trolling
  32. Re:Even paper ballots are not a paper trail (by BB by Elfboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    actually no. There is no proof in tampering/removal of the mail-ins vs what was counted by the machine. Scenario.

    Feed in Ballots...
    Find out Canidate X lost by 450 votes.
    Alter Machine Total via documented exploit.
    'Loose' 451 Cadidate Y mail in ballots.

    Where the tape shows how many were read-in vs how many are present.

    --
    * We dance where angels fear to tread *
  33. eVACS is actually in active use by fact0r · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually eVACS is in active use. It is production quality product with full security review by at least one security group (and anyone can - it is open source).

    This open-source system was developed by a number of well known names in the open source community - including - Andrew Tridgell (Samba), Martin Pool (Apache), and Rusty Russell (ip-tables / netfilter).

    All elections for the ACT government in Australia are now run using this system. Votes are lodged either at an eVACS terminal or - if lodged on paper ballot sheets - are manually entered into the electronic system for counting. That is - all votes end up in electronic form before counting / preference distribution is done automatically by computer.

    more info and source code from the electoral office and the government recommends continued use following a full review after the last election.

    There are a couple of factors that meant electronic counting / voting were going to come sooner rather than later in the ACT: the useful base of some well regarded open source leaders + the ACTs difficult Hare-Clark preference distribution scheme (allowing the part of your vote unnecessary to elect your prefered candidate to go on and help elect your next prefered candidate).

    +laughing at US politics paragraph+ Obviously the $200,000 cost of development of such an open, accurate, and secure system is clearly not high enough to give US governments' bank rollers the belief they are getting value for money from their political donations! Maybe Halliburton can develop such a system for use in the US for a billion or so?

  34. What is the US Secret Service doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What is the US Secret Service doing?

    It is supposedly their responsibility to see that election fraud doesn't happen, yet the evidence of fraud is clear as a day.

    Why? Are americans happy with this?

    http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Diebold_insider__all eges_company_plagued_1206.html

    Shortly before the election, ten days to two weeks, we were told that the date in the machine was malfunctioning, the source recalled. So we were told 'Apply this patch in a big rush. Later, the Diebold insider learned that the patches were never certified by the state of Georgia, as required by law.

    Also, the clock inside the system was not fixed, said the insider. Its legendary how strange the outcome was; they ended up having the first Republican governor in who knows when and also strange outcomes in other races. I can say that the counties I worked in were heavily Democratic and elected a Republican. ...

  35. Resignation is not enough by beforewisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Resignation is not enough, I want prosecution

  36. Re:Sore losers by Gryle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ah jeez. Listen people, God doesn't play politics. Frankly, He's got better things to do. I wish people would quit trying to claim God is on the side of their party. If you people would bother to actually read what Christ taught you might understand this. [generalization]Republicans are sorely lacking the social justice of Christianity and Democrats are sorely lacking the moral judgements of Christianity[/generalization]. Republicans don't care about Christ any more than the Democrats do and vice versa. Quit using religion as a political tool.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  37. No, this is real and there's new test data out... by JimMarch(equalccw) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To quote the latest article on the Black Box Voting site (and then some background below that):

    ---
    http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/1559 5.html?1134523376

    Due to security design issues and contractual non-performance, Leon County (Florida) supervisor of elections Ion Sancho told Black Box Voting that he will never use Diebold in an election again. He has requested funds to replace the Diebold system from the county. He will issue a formal announcement to this effect shortly.

    Finnish security expert Harri Hursti proved that Diebold lied to Secretaries of State across the nation when Diebold claimed votes could not be changed on the memory card.

    A test election was run in Leon County today with a total of eight ballots - six ballots voted "no" on a ballot question as to whether Diebold voting machines can be hacked or not. Two ballots, cast by Dr. Herbert Thomson and by Harri Hursti voted "yes" indicating a belief that the Diebold machines could be hacked.

    At the beginning of the test election the memory card programmed by Harri Hursti was inserted into an Optical Scan Diebold voting machine. A "zero report" was run indicating zero votes on the memory card. In fact, however, Hursti had pre-loaded the memory card with plus and minus votes.

    The eight ballots were run through the optical scan machine. The standard Diebold-supplied "ender card" was run through as is normal procedure ending the election. A results tape was run from the voting machine.

    Correct results should have been:

    Yes:2 No:6

    However the results tape read:

    Yes:7 No:1

    The results were then uploaded from the optical scan voting machine into the GEMS central tabulator. The central tabulator is the "mothership" that pulls in all votes from voting machines. The results in the central tabulator read:

    Yes:7 No:1

    This proves that the votes themselves were changed in a one-step process that would not be detected in any normal canvassing procedure - using only a credit-card sized memory card.

    Diebold Elections Systems head of research and development Pat Green specifically told the Cuyahoga County board of elections that votes could not be changed on the memory card.

    According to Public Records responses obtained by Black Box Voting in response to our requests shows that Diebold promulgated this misrepresentation to as many as 800 state and local elections officials.

    In other news, according to Bradblog a stockholder suit was filed today against Diebold by the law offices of Scott and Scott:

    http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002153.htm

    Permission to reprint granted with link to http://blackboxvoting.org/
    ---

    Jim again. Let me fill you in on the background.

    Six months ago Leon County elections administrator Ion Sancho asked us (Black Box Voting) to "test hack" his Diebold optical scan system. We brought Finnish security expert Harri Hursti and Dr. Hugh Thomson from Florida along.

    Dr. Thomson proved that the central tabulator's database (in MS-Access of all things) can be hacked without a retail copy of MS-Access present. He used Visual Basic to control the MS Jet database engine directly, using very small script files...small enough to be typed in via MS-Windows Notepad at the tabulator console. We already knew the MS-Access database was tamper-friendly but this was real-world proof that you didn't need to bring in and load a copy of Access to tamper. The same things can almost certainly be done in Java and probably other ways as well.

    Harri Hursti pulled off something new.

    The report co-written with Bev Harris proved it's possible to doctor the poll tapes. These are the end-of-day printouts showing the number of votes for each candidate or issue taken in on that machine. It's basically

  38. Sorry to break the news... by guygee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    to the "true believers" that remain among my fellow Americans, but firing Walden W. O'Dell will not automagically bring back integrity to the voting system here in the U.S. Most slashdotters are savvy enough to know that paperless voting using secret, proprietary code can be easily manipulated. We will not be safe from this type of fraud until paperless voting is outlawed in ALL states.

    Also, many slashdotters have knowledge of the "Law of Large Numbers", and know that a well-designed exit poll should be accurate within its designed level of confidence. Large statistical "anomalies" between exit polling and "recorded votes" associated with the 2002 (Georgia, Minnesota), 2004 (Presidential election, many states) and 2005 (Ohio referendums) verge on the quasi-impossible, until you factor in deliberate fraud. Exit polls do not lie, and when the margin of error is exceeded time and again, all with identical bias, we can be sure that the system is being gamed. Exit polls, after all, are how the fairness of elections is assessed in those "corrupt, third-world" countries.

    At least be comforted the "powers that be" that really control the country still feel the need to throw us dogs the "bones" of legitimacy. In the words of Frank Zappa,

    "The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way, and you will see a brick wall at the back of the theater."

    1. Re:Sorry to break the news... by guygee · · Score: 3, Informative
      Quoth LegendLength:

      It's funny though because I've never seen the Democratics argue for a system that includes formal checks against exit polls for these apparently obvious anomalies.

      Checks of voting results against exit polls are traditionally an "informal" function of the Fourth Estate. These duties are contracted out to organizations made up of trained professionals (e.g. statistician, sociologists) who specialize in compensating for extraneous variables to remove bias and assure a degree of confidence in the results. In return, the media organizations that pay for these polls gain prestige and a reputation for journalistic integrity as a function of the accuracy of the polls. An infamous counterexample is the Chicago Tribune's erroneous headline "Dewey Beats Truman" in 1948, which was based on a biased sampling methodology, due to phone polling when, in 1948, the distribution of telephones favored wealthy Dewey voters rather than poor Truman supporters. Certainly the reputation of the Tribune suffered, and they must still blush whenever the famous picture of Truman holding up their front page comes up.

      Since then, the sophistication of polling has increased dramatically. A good article with reference can be found here:

      http://www.tompaine.com/articles/letters_debating_ exit_polls.php

      Some select quotes:

      "...prominent survey researchers (e.g., Asner 1999, Cantril 1991:142), political scientists (e.g., Edwards & Wayne 1999:84), and journalists (e.g., Jurkowitz 2000) concur that they (exit polls) are highly reliable. As far back as 1987, political columnist David Broder wrote that exit polls "are the most useful analytic tool developed in my working life" (1987:253). Edwards & Wayne (1999:84) caution only that, "... the problem with exit polls lies in their accuracy (rather than inaccuracy). They give the press access to predict the outcome before the elections have been concluded."

      "An exit pollster himself for more than 20 years, St. Louis University Professor of Political Science Ken Warren (2003) has never had an error greater than 2 percent, except one time--in a 1982 St. Louis primary. In that election, massive voter fraud was subsequently uncovered."

      "Temple University professor of mathematics John Allen Paulos wrote in a column in the Philadelphia Inquirer that... "huge differences between the final tallies and the exit poll percentages occurred in 10 of the 11 battleground states, all of them in Bush's favor. If the people sampled in the exit polls were a random sample of voters, Freeman's standard statistical techniques show that these large discrepancies are way, way beyond the margins of error." (In regards to Mr. Baker's charge of unimpressive credentials, I note that Paulos, a prominent mathematician and author, was the winner of the 2003 American Association for the Advancement of Science award for the promotion of public understanding of science).

      "Because of their reliability, exit polls are used to verify elections around the world. When exit polls deviated from the official count in Serbia and the former Soviet Republics of Belarus, Georgia, and the Ukraine; the world--led by the United States--accepted exit poll numbers over the official count, and in three of these nations, the election results were successfully overturned."

      As for further sources, there is a wealth of links in other posts under this topic. I have been though and read the majority of these links for myself, and I stand by my statements based on the extensive research that has been done. My real research topic for tonight was supposed to be "Bubble-like visualization of UWB propagation in immersive environments", so you will forgive me if I invite you to get in touch with your own "Inner Google Monkey", if you really want to find out the truth.

    2. Re:Sorry to break the news... by guygee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am glad you appreciated my previous post, LegendLength, but I do not agree with your comment below:

      Note that if you argue it is because it is wrong on occasion, then surely that is enough to stop it being used in any serious argument.

      As you may well know, the error function is Gaussian, the PDF extends out to infinity both positive and negative. I reject the argument that we need to "mathematically" prove that fraud has occurred, we only need to prove it to satisfy legal standards; "beyond a reasonable doubt". For example, the differences between exit polls and "recorded votes" in 2004 were extraordinary, and in all of the key "battleground" states the swings were towards George W. Bush. Dr Stephen F. Freeman from the University of Pennsylvania calculated that the odds of just three of the major swing states, Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania all swinging as far as they did against their respective exit polls were 250 million to 1. (See, for example, http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/2004votefraud.ht ml

      The swings in the 2005 Ohio referendum are even more extraordinary (http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2 005/1559, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brad-friedman/the-st aggeringly-impossib_b_10589.html) Again, these swings were in the "preferred" Republican direction

      Awareness of these atrocities is growing around the fringes of "permissible political discourse" in this country. My fervent hope is that it will not be long until the issue explodes into the public consciousness and the criminals are exposed. In a court of law, where we will see which standard of proof satisfies justice

  39. Re:The basic concept is flawed. INDEED by starm_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amen The fact that this is such an obvious solution and that it is so trivial to implement is what makes the chosen convoluted, hackable, no-recount alternative so suspicious. What honest and experienced company would chose anything but that easy and elegant solution you describe if not because they want to open the possibility to election fraud??? No amount of electronic tweaking will make the system secure. There is always a weak link. Even if Diebold had the best intention in the world, how can they be sure that a partisant lone coder did not sneake a line of code within I'm sure what are millions of lines, converting say 5% of the votes. This could be done at any point in the chain of programs that handle the votes; from the user interface, to the final tally, through the individual machine databases, the talying computer etc. I have programed plenty and I can tell you that, it would be very easy to implement the "bug" so that it happens ONLY on the day of the election and previous and following tests show no bias. a paper trail is necessary!

  40. Re:"news blog" ? by slashing1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh the irony. Or something like that.

    Diebold's CEO is out because the company is not credible with a Bush supporter at the helm.

    AC says says Raw Story is not credible because of an anti-Bush ad.

    Now Monkey's got some insightful comment where credible is not necessarily "balanced," therefore anything "balanced" is a lie. My head hurts.

    I say we go with the purple finger thingy for our voting system.

  41. So lemme get this straight... by Lothsahn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone says "pound me in the ass federal prison" and that somehow makes it a romance?

    --
    -=Lothsahn=-
    1. Re:So lemme get this straight... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, maybe if they buy you flowers afterwards?

  42. To Diebold or not to .. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... To Diebold or not to Diebold, that is the question ... ... the answer is 42

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  43. No, not the same reason. by StarKruzr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the allegations against him are true - and there is every reason to believe they are - then Bush's lies killed over 2000 American soldiers and over 30000 Iraqis for no good reason. Kerry has no such blood on his hands.

    --

    +++ATH0
  44. Ok I get it by flyinwhitey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Or how about the CEO being close friends to Dick Cheney and a top republican supporter while his competitors supported both parties instead?"

    You're trying to punish this guy for making his allegiances clear, while simultaneously giving kudos to people who don't.

    I don't understand this reasoning, and I don't see how intentionally obscuring your motivations is any better than obscuring your code.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  45. prison rape is very unfunny by bodrell · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I know it's a stretch for you kids, but just once can the subject of prison come up without you all coming out with the tired old litany of lame rape jokes please? You Yanks have a fucking obsession with prison rape. Seriously, it's not funny, it's creepy, quit it.

    You're completely right--it isn't funny. It's very, very scary. It's the reason people here are scared of going to jail. Sadly, a jail sentence almost guarantees cruel and unusual punishment in the form of anal rape. Last week on The Boondocks they covered this topic. One character is a lawyer who has always been straightlaced because of the threat of anal rape.

    I remember, from a few years ago, an anti-rape activist (found his name thanks to Google: Tom Cahill) who was protesting the Vietnam war while living in San Antonio, and the police basically caused him to be raped. They threw him in a room with a bunch of career criminals and allowed him to be raped for about 24 hours continuously. That was his punishment for protesting the war.

    By the way, I found his current website.

    I personally believe that almost all prisons in the US today violate the Constitutional Amendment prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment. But hey, the retards in my government routinely extract suspects for torture in the name of fighting terrorism, so I shouldn't be surprised. Yet another example of why it is shameful to be an American. I just pray they don't reviolate the First Amendment by bringing back prayer in school (ahem--Intelligent Design).

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  46. Why go digital at all? by danpsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just because computers are good for some things, doesn't mean they are good for everything. I don't know why people don't get this concept.

    Digital is great because of a few of its attributes:

    • Malleable - Digital media can easily be altered in order to keep up with changing information
    • Manipulability - Digital media can be altered automatically and even remotely if desired

    Now what else does this list encompass... Oh that's right, the exact opposite of what you want from voting results!

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.