Slashdot Mirror


Fakes, Coming to a Store Near You

fishdan writes to tell us that while most Slashdotters have their own trusted sources for gear there is a growing concern that all consumers should look out for. According to PC World, more and more counterfeit hardware is coming to market each year. From the article: '...batteries aren't the only tech item that counterfeiters love. In October 2004, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials in Anchorage, Alaska, seized 20,000 suspected fake Memorex USB memory key thumb drives from Asia. And last year, Miami officials seized 900 allegedly phony laptops valued at $700,000. "Maybe it's a laptop, an MP3 player, or a component like a DVD drive--anything in the digital world can be counterfeited," says Therese Randazzo, a U.S. Customs Service counterfeiting expert.'"

286 comments

  1. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is wrong with counterfeit electronics? Do they have different functionality, are they shabbily built, or do they just take profits away from the rightful owners of the product?

    1. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe Its because IP laws or something that "fake HP printers ink" its cheaper but evile.

    2. Re:I don't get it by tor528 · · Score: 1, Informative
      FTA:
      Bogus cell phone batteries, shoddily made and potentially unsafe, are a specialty of counterfeiters. "It's one thing to buy a fake $30 Louis Vuitton bag on Canal Street in New York City. It's an entirely different matter when you buy a fake cell phone battery and it blows up," says Arch Ahern, Motorola's senior counsel for trademark and marketing.
      Plus, you pay a premium for a brand-name. Buying counterfeited hardware is like paying for a BMW and driving home with a Pinto.
      --
      If I think something is funny, I will probably mod it +1 Insightful. "It's funny because it's true."
    3. Re:I don't get it by Big+Nothing · · Score: 5, Informative

      "What is wrong with counterfeit electronics? Do they have different functionality, are they shabbily built, or do they just take profits away from the rightful owners of the product?"

      From TFA:
      Bogus cell phone batteries, shoddily made and potentially unsafe, are a specialty of counterfeiters. "It's one thing to buy a fake $30 Louis Vuitton bag on Canal Street in New York City. It's an entirely different matter when you buy a fake cell phone battery and it blows up"

      So yes, lack of quality IS a problem - it's not just IP whine.

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    4. Re:I don't get it by ddx+Christ · · Score: 1
      You didn't even read the headline of the article.

      "Fakes!
      "Counterfeit hardware is making its way to online merchants and to stores near you. And poor performance isn't the only risk: Bogus parts can be hazardous to your health."

    5. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sometimes the factories in third-world-factories that produce the "legit" products also produce those "fake" things. Is there something like this in computer electronics manufacture ?

    6. Re:I don't get it by Rebel_lord · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you'd read the article, you would see that sometimes certain counterfeit products came broken or worse malfunctioned in such a way that caused injury. If there's really something counterfeit I'd avoid, it's batteries. Better safe than sorry is my motto when it comes to my valuable electronics like cell phones, laptops and MP3 players.

    7. Re:I don't get it by damsa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Counterfeits are not made to the same standard as originals, if they were made to the same standards then the counterfeiters wouldn't be trying to pass off their goods as fakes, they would be making claims that their products were better.

      When you buy a product from a manufacturer, you as a buyer are protected by warranty laws, a counterfeiter can get away with selling stuff even if the quality is the same as the original for a lower price because they don't have to support you.

      Counterfeiters do take away profits from the rightful owners of the product. Companies spend millions of dollars to develop a product and to appeal to a certain market. If counterfeiters were allowed to counterfeit, then companies would not develop products.

      Also, how would like to buy an Intel computer but only to find that the insides are actually made by a Chinese knockoff company.

    8. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      'It's an entirely different matter when you buy a fake cell phone battery and it blows up," says Arch Ahern, Motorola's senior counsel for trademark and marketing.'

      Well i'd expect him to say as much. What facts back him up?

    9. Re:I don't get it by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      I had lots of third-party batteries for my motorola flip-phone around 15 years ago. I never had any problems with them.

      It was ~$15 for the third-party battery and ~$90 for the motorola one.

      I'm not sure it counts as counterfeit though since it was totally clear that it was not made by motorola.

    10. Re:I don't get it by Esteanil · · Score: 1

      Try complaining about a broke counterfeit Toshiba(or whatever), or sending it in for service, and I think you'll find out what the problem is rather quickly.

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    11. Re:I don't get it by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Interesting
      they are shabby built, have different functionality and have no warranty.

      here you can see a picture of a fake usb bluetooth adapter. as you can see the antenna is a dummy, the only antenna it has is "drawn" on the pcb. also the bluetooth stack is a different one.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    12. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It goes really far down the chain. Nowdays you can't buy certain power transistors from just anywhere. Prized japense power transistors like even 2sc5200/2sa1943 are being counterfeited. the counterfeit devices have a much smaller die and no heatspreader. they are just glued to the package.

      This obviously has issues with the entire manufacturing process. anything that needed these parts now must be tested.

      counterfeit stuff is almost certainly poor quality, possibly bordering on dangerous. it makes the most sense as you get maximum profits that way.

      Further there is no accountability. A defective and dangerous product could harm people, thusly bringing lawsuits. These lawsuits would target, in this case, innocent corporations instead of outright dishonest ones. the lack of a need to care about the consumer at all makes counterfeitting electronics dangerous.

    13. Re:I don't get it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      A direct copy of a brand name product probably hasn't had any effort put in other than making it into a good copy.

      A cheap product from china with a bizarre brand name made up by somebody who knows 10 words of english may actually have good engineering in it. At least that way you know exactly what you are getting.

    14. Re:I don't get it by doubtless · · Score: 1

      you might still remember the fake nokia cell phone batteries that exploded up.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    15. Re:I don't get it by nacturation · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with counterfeit electronics? Do they have different functionality, are they shabbily built, or do they just take profits away from the rightful owners of the product?

      Generally, yes, yes, and yes. Also, it's not so much about taking profits away from the rightful owners but a matter of trademark and copyright infringement. If it's a Lexan USB drive with a Memorex label on it, I don't think you're getting ripped off regarding quality and functionality. But generally, it's inferior products which are being marketed under a different name so that the stores can buy on the cheap and sell at brand-name prices. Sometimes it really doesn't matter whether you get name brand or not (eg: CD/DVD plastic cases).

      But what happens when a component in your supposedly Thinkpad laptop dies? You take it to IBM and they say it's counterfeit and won't fix it. Who's willing to back it up with a warranty? Offering warranties costs a lot of money. You need to run a call/contact center to field customer questions, walk them through the standard "try this" scripts, and then if there's still a problem you dispatch field service technicians who have the equipment to diagnose and hopefully do an on-site repair or provide you with a replacement if it can't be fixed on-site. Not cheap! All that cost gives companies incentive to make the product better to begin with so they can minimize the amount of support they'll need to provide. Counterfeiters realize none of those expenses, thus the cheaper prices and inferior products.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    16. Re:I don't get it by DrXym · · Score: 1
      As a rule, most counterfeit stuff no resemblance to the real thing at all except for the logo. It is totally and completely different in terms of quality, materials and functionality. Thus I reckon that these counterfeits were probably cheap OEM parts which had been stamped with a logo, thus rendering them counterfeit. You'd probably see the same parts being sold elsewhere with a no-name logo.

      As long as you the purchaser know they're counterfeit, and accept all the risks which go along with that (e.g. your laptop PSU burning your house to the ground), I don't see a big problem. It's not like you're depriving the real company of profit since you know it's a fake and bought it on that basis. You're not even materially harming them that much either assuming their real kit is better quality than the fake.

      What would harm the real manufacturer is when you *don't* know it is counterfeit. I expect that there are enough tech-illiterate people out there who couldn't tell the real thing from the fake that it would be easy to set up shop in a market or elsewhere and shift these things. eBay is a counterfeiter's wet dream and it wouldn't surprise me at all if most of the stuff is destined for there or similar sites. The Register has an amusing piece about fake handycams.

      Still, this is not some new phenomena. Cameras, tape decks etc. have long been using been branded Sony or soundalikes (or courtesy of the Simpsons) such as Sorny, Panaphonics etc.. If you're stupid enough to believe some cheap piece of shit you buy from a dodgy dealer is genuine brand name product then you should hold yourself partly to blame.

    17. Re:I don't get it by Basje · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of these items are made in the same shops, with the same materials by the same workers as the originals. They are made in [Chinese|Russian|Malaysian|Other emrging economy] factories that during the daytime produce their product (eg thumbdrives for Memorex), and during the night for "parallel export".

      There are dangers to this practise. In these cases the producer cannot be held accountable (because it's not know who it is), so they don't have an interest in quality control. Often, discarded parts (that didn't meet QA) from the daytime are used.

      The only other difference is that the profits are not for the originating company. So in the case of forged thumbdrives: if it works, it most likely identical to one bought legitimately.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    18. Re:I don't get it by damsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's different than counterfeiting. It is perfectly legal to state that your battery is compatible with a Motorola. It is another thing to state that the battery is made by Motorola and will be supported by Motorola if it goes bad. In the US, people are allowed to state things are compatible, I can make HP compatible inks, I can also make perfume that smells exactly the same as the a name brand perfume as long as I make it clear that it is not the name brand perfume. Calling your perfume Opium is probably not okay, calling it Poppy Seed, with a tagline, smells like Opium is perfectly fine.

    19. Re:I don't get it by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      or do they just take profits away from the rightful owners of the product?

      You probably mean the rightful manufacturer of the product. We're speaking about hardware here, so the owner would be the buyer, not the maker.

    20. Re:I don't get it by bronney · · Score: 1

      Also, how would like to buy an Intel computer but only to find that the insides are actually made by a Chinese knockoff company.

      Or worse yet, you found out it's made by AMD!!! oh noes!!!!111onetwoten.!

    21. Re:I don't get it by baryon351 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Others have brought up good comments - that sometimes the counterfeits can be dangerous, not work the same as the real thing, not comply with local laws, be interference-prone electronics etc.

      Another problem is when a device made in the same factory as the real deal (let's say a Toshiba laptop) is sold in the US as a real toshiba. To many people hey, it's a real toshiba, and it's half the price!

      But part of the price of the REAL toshiba is the Quality Control that occurs along the line. Perhaps only 85% of all laptops made in that factory actually end up being accepted by toshiba as inventory, and the rest is set to be dismantled, scrapped or refurbished as something went wrong on the assembly line. So what do you get when you buy the fake toshiba?

      You get one of the *already rejected* "toshibas" that was never meant to be released to the public. Not only was it never given a serial number that matches a toshiba-sold product so all warranty is out the window, it's already been rejected and defined as having problems. Made in the same factory, yes, but not the same quality as the final for-sale object.

      Maybe you'll get lucky and get a solid machine that only has some case defects. Maybe you'll get a lemon that doesn't stay powered on for more than 15 minutes, has no warranty, and you still paid $400 for.

    22. Re:I don't get it by baldass_newbie · · Score: 0, Troll

      So yes, lack of quality IS a problem - it's not just IP whine.


      So are we FOR the Government this time or against it, I forgot to bring my scorecard.
      Apologies.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    23. Re:I don't get it by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If there's really something counterfeit I'd avoid, it's batteries

      how certain are you that those new brake pads the shop fitted to your car the other week weren't just compressed cardboard? or that bolt holding the engine in place on the wing of the airplane you're boarding today was really manufactured by one of Boeing's proper suppliers. Those are items currently being counterfeited that really scare me.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    24. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yer from Kentucky? Shouldn't you be writing "batteries that done blowed up"?

      FYI, it's "batteries that exploded", end of sentence. Nothing "explodes up" except perhaps pyrotechnics which are rigged in such a way that the main explosive discharge is directed towards the sky. The likelihood of a battery being so rigged for a vertical discharge is exceedingly small.

    25. Re:I don't get it by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The biggest problem (IMHO) is loss of revenue, for one, and decrease in perceived value from the brand. If I buy a fake SONY DVD player and it is crap, I will think SONY DVD's are crap. This is why they fight these guys as much.

      A battery exploding, while problematic, does not really impact the company being faked in a direct fashion. And they hold the stick for repression.

      They just use the battery explosions as a banner to say "Hey, we are not evil and fighting for our beloved revenue. We fight for customer protection."
      --
      George Herriman's Krazy Kat

    26. Re:I don't get it by ezzzD55J · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it might just be me, but i've suspected cellphone companies doing their part in spreading FUD about cheap(er) clones.

    27. Re:I don't get it by newend · · Score: 1

      There are also potential fake components. You could buy a resister or capacitor that uses lead (which is illegal in some countries). The general quality control won't be as high which can lead to all sorts of malfunctions.

    28. Re:I don't get it by squoozer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your argument, while good, only fits a small number of cases where the fake could actually hurt someone. I fail to see how a memory stick can blow up and hurt someone.

      A much better reason to discourage this type of piracy is simply because margins are already tight in the electronics world without forcing the few players that exist to fight for their money with people ripping them off. There are areas where I feel pirates play an important roll. Music, movie and clothes production spring to mind. Production costs for these items has drop substantially in recent years but prices haven't generally followed. The pirates are showing the consumers that prices need not be as high as they are paying. I admit that pirates don't have associated development costs and therefore will always be able to sell for less but when you see a pirated copy of a movie for free and the real thing costs £16 ($30) you have to ask where the money is going.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    29. Re:I don't get it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but i've suspected cellphone companies doing their part in spreading FUD about cheap(er) clones.

      Just like car makers selling "genuine parts".

    30. Re:I don't get it by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I once bought (knowingly) a fake Polo shirt. When I got it home, I discovered it had Tommy Hillfiger buttons sewn onto it :)

    31. Re:I don't get it by tigersha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      NiMH Battries are not toys. They contain electronic safeguards to ensure they run within parameters otherwise they explode (end they blow up if they run too empty too). This has happened to Nokia in the past and people were hurt because their cellphones started burning. This was caused by fake batteries. The energy density in an NiMH cell is very high.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    32. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to use an extreme example to paint all functional electronics imitators with one brush. Don't buy your batteries from untrusted sources. Don't buy your medical equipment from untrusted sources. Don't buy your bottled water from untrusted sources. But do save money on your electronics when you can get it cheaper by buying an equivalent product made by manufacturer that believes in flattering their competition.

    33. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So what do you get when you buy the fake toshiba?

      You get to pawn it off on the auction site.

    34. Re:I don't get it by JPeMu · · Score: 1

      "Counterfeits are not made to the same standard as originals, if they were made to the same standards then the counterfeiters wouldn't be trying to pass off their goods as fakes, they would be making claims that their products were better."

      If you were ripping off a "no-name" brand and trying to present it as the same "no-name", then sure, this would certainly be the case, but if you're trying to rip off say a genuine Toshiba laptop, or Motorola cell battery, then isn't it going to be difficult to convince consumers that your product is better than the manufacturer's own named brand? [although I guess your comments re. warranty kind of highlight that] After all, as a consumer why would you accept that a "SuperTosh" is better than a Toshiba? One brand you have heard of (and either inherently trust or distrust as a result), and the other you have never heard of (so should automatically be somewhat cautious about). As a slightly related issue, is this difficulty in marketing for an "unheard of" company making hardware so severe that it would drive them to market counterfeit goods, or is it plain greed (or both? lol)

    35. Re:I don't get it by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is that the secret of NiMH?

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    36. Re:I don't get it by geminidomino · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I buy a fake SONY DVD player and it is crap, I will think SONY DVD's are crap.

      How is that different from buying a REAL Sony DVD player?

    37. Re:I don't get it by packeteer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason fake electronics are bad is becuase they are not tracable back to their rightful manufacterer. If there is a low quality batch of, say USB cards, that lose data randomly, why should the non-fake manufacterer have their name associated with them.

      A lot of people here are having the standard knee-jerk reaction of saying only corporate profits benefit by cutting out fakes but thats just not the case. If a compan builds a brand name not with marketing but build a brand name with actually releasing a quality product then why should the be associated with the quality of fake items. Do you want to read a review of a top of the line quality electronics manufacterer and go out and buy the reviewed item only to find you got bought a low quality item?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    38. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the only difference between a fake battery that's going to blow up, and a perfectly fine "noname" battery, is the "Motorola" name?

      If they would just remove the Motorola name from the fake batteries, everything would be fine. /me thinks *someone* (not necessarily you) is mixing two things - fake names and crap products.

    39. Re:I don't get it by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Chinese ones are supposed to be more crap. I know, it's hard to believe, but it is true.

      But you raise a good point: If a fake was released that was much better than the original, would they still attack them? It's a legitimate question.

      --
      George Herriman's Krazy Kat

    40. Re:I don't get it by Froug · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how a memory stick can blow up and hurt someone.

      Fire is always a hazard when dealing with electronics. A faulty memory stick isn't very likely to explode, but it could quite possibly smoulder and burn.

    41. Re:I don't get it by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Having knowingly bought a fake Polo shirt, did it occur that perhaps the Tommy Hilfiger buttons were also fake, and there as a result of poor "counterfeit QC", rather than you lucking out (if such a phrase can be applied to a couple of buttons)?

    42. Re:I don't get it by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      A cheap product from china with a bizarre brand name made up by somebody who knows 10 words of english may actually have good engineering in it. At least that way you know exactly what you are getting.

      Funny as I read that I was looking at the cover of my Cisco(tm)(r) branded power brick.

      The thing has more chinese on it than english... btw. this is my third - the first two exploded.

      So, in the interests of accuracy:

      An expensive product from china with a bizarre brand name made up by somebody who knows 10 words of english may actually have good engineering in it. At least that way you know exactly what you are getting.

    43. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      you don't seem to realize the point of the fake name. it isn't just to capitilze on reputation, it's to prevent problems due to fake or shoddy products from coming back to the thief who made them. I've bought a memory key that had no circuit board in it, it was just the cut end of a usb cable with a case glued over it. that's how far they can go with this, the two are connected.

    44. Re:I don't get it by terminal.dk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. It is a problem. When the handle on the Louis Vuitton bag breaks, you can lose way more than a cell phone. Maybe your digital camera, video camera, and $2000 laptop all dies.

      There is a reason to buy quality, and to be aware that a brand name does not necessarily mean quality.

      In Denmark we had a case. A supermarket was selling "counterfeit" Puma shoes. The only difference between the cheap Puma and the full price Puma was, that the manufacturer had lost his Puma contract, but was still producing the same shoes.

      Go for quality rather than brand names.

      The best color you can buy is usually last year's :)

    45. Re:I don't get it by djupedal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Examples...and believe me, I know of where I speak, since I'm living at ground zero for where this stuff originates.

      Sony branded ni-cads - might hold a charge ok for the first few uses...rapidly downhill from there. Who knows what is inside. Use your imagination, but remember to only consider materials that are easy to obtain, with low cost up front.

      Sony branded 1gb USB microdrive - after one week...corrupted data. On and on...blank CDs, DVDs, SD cards....no end. If you get in with the shop vendors, they know what to avoid, and they won't sell you the bad stuff. I've learned how to spot most if it, but the odds are more than 50/50 you'll be buying fake, regardless of the outlet. Fake cosmetics, deodorants, medicines, shoes, clothes, watches...a small percentage are acutally high quality, just made after hours. But for the most part, the fakes are of lower quality than the originals.

      How good are they at doing this? No joke, I've seen fake raw eggs. Shell, egg white and yolk. No protein or edible matter whatsoever. Mostly off the shelf building materials. What kind of profit is there, when there is a market for a fake fresh chicken eggs?

      Why is this so prevalent? Believe it or not, being able to copy an original is considered a test of ability. It is routine for one generation in China to test itself by attempting to duplicate something done by their ancestors. From fabrics to porcelin, it shows respect and skill by being able to reliably copy something that was first done over two thousand years ago.

      Where is this headed? What better craftsmen, to really be the first to clone a human.

    46. Re:I don't get it by carl0ski · · Score: 2, Informative

      [quote]Sometimes the factories in third-world-factories that produce the "legit" products also produce those "fake" things. Is there something like this in computer electronics manufacture ?[/quote] yes Intel gave AMD all necessary Information to produce

      the Intel 80386 Microprocessor in the early 80's then the 486.
      As intel could make the CPU fast enough for the Demand and outsource to AMD to manufacture them.

      AMD started selling the exactly identical chip as Intel
      (they had the blueprints afterall and were by authorised by Intel to produce them. :)

      Suddenly there was Intel 486 Processor
      versus AMD 486 processor
      same processor but AMD was undercutting Intel on price.

      Enter Pentium haha AMD you cant copy our name any more since it is
      Trademarked

    47. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get why this is news, at least to slashdotters. We've been dealing with "non-counterfiet" electronics sellers that lie, cheat, steal, and basically treat us like dirt. Newegg, Pricewatch, if we haven't learned to watch out for a deal to good to be true by now, either we're idiots (and I'm not against such an assertion) or worse, optimists.

    48. Re:I don't get it by 21st+Century+Peon · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how a memory stick can blow up and hurt someone.

      Then you're not throwing it hard enough.

      --
      "Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!"
      ~Harcourt Fenton Mudd
    49. Re:I don't get it by makomk · · Score: 2, Informative

      NiMH Battries are not toys. They contain electronic safeguards to ensure they run within parameters otherwise they explode (end they blow up if they run too empty too). This has happened to Nokia in the past and people were hurt because their cellphones started burning. This was caused by fake batteries. The energy density in an NiMH cell is very high.

      I know that's true of Lithium Ion batteries (hence why they're always packaged in a flat plastic square - the electronics are included in the battery pack), but I thought NiMH batteries were just generally plain cells with no electronics whatsoever.

    50. Re:I don't get it by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Chinese ones are supposed to be more crap.

      Most "real" Sony hardware is made in China anyway. I've got a Chinese-brand DVD player; works perfectly. And it plays counterfeit DVDs that Sony players refuse to....

    51. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lovely - thank you for a great reference on a Monday morning!

    52. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument, while good, only fits a small number of cases where the fake could actually hurt someone. I fail to see how a memory stick can blow up and hurt someone.

      Sure, but I can think of plenty of other ways a shoddily-made memory stick could hurt someone.

      For example, if I had a memory stick which claimed to be robustly made, and it actually broke in the course of normal use, then there's a good possibility that I could be greatly inconvenienced by that breakage. Even if I had backups of the data, it could be unfeasible to get at them (for example, if I was trying to use the memory stick on a transatlantic flight, and the backup was back in my office 1000 miles away and receding). And data is important. Not getting work done on that flight could cost my company millions, and me my job. I think that counts as "hurting".

    53. Re:I don't get it by bcattwoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The pirates are showing the consumers that prices need not be as high as they are paying. I admit that pirates don't have associated development costs and therefore will always be able to sell for less but when you see a pirated copy of a movie for free and the real thing costs £16 ($30) you have to ask where the money is going.

      First off music/movie and clothing "pirates" are really different creatures. Clothing pirates actually produce a product and then try to leech off of someone elses good name to make a sale. Anyone can see for themselves that a handbag can cost less than $300 by going to Walmart. The bags there don't have the cachet of a Loius Vitton bag though.

      Your comments are even more ridiculous applied to music/movies. To say that a pirate has lower production costs is a rather large understatement. Producing a movie requires all sorts of expenses from paying actors, directors, stagehands, etc, to marketing. Pirating a movie requires the movie, a computer, and an internet connection. No mystery on how the pirate can "make" the movie so cheaply. Independent low budget producers/labels are a better example of how movies/music can be made more cheaply.

    54. Re:I don't get it by jim_redwagon · · Score: 1

      And it plays counterfeit DVDs that Sony players refuse to....

      where can i get me one of those? ;-)

      --
      I forgot what I wanted to say, but honestly, it was important.
    55. Re:I don't get it by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      China, apparently.

      Heh.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    56. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any competent mechanic would be able to tell the difference between an authentic brake pad and compressed cardboard. The real things are quite thick and heavy.

      Actually, brake pads are user-serviceable if you know how to operate a jack and a socket wrench (I've done it a few times). If you're that mistrusting of your mechanic, save some money and do it yourself.

    57. Re:I don't get it by jim_redwagon · · Score: 0, Troll

      I hear the boats are slow getting there...

      --
      I forgot what I wanted to say, but honestly, it was important.
    58. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (hence why they're always packaged in a flat plastic square - the electronics are included in the battery pack)

      This is also why we'll probably never see commodity rechargable Li-Ion batteries (eg, AA, C, and D cells), at least not for a while. Manufacturers (and perhaps governments) are afraid of the safety implications.

      However you can easily get commodity NiMH batteries.

    59. Re:I don't get it by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      This group would attack them. The unauthorized version could be better, safer, and cheaper than the authorized version and they would attack it. They are a pro-trademark group. Think of them as the RIAA.

    60. Re:I don't get it by The+Ilia · · Score: 0

      Wait. So are the counterfeit batteries made of rats? Oh my god. Mrs. Frisby is the one who's making the fake batteries. Robert C. O'Brien predicted this many years ago.

      --
      All of the brightest boys, To play with the biggest toys - More than they bargained for...
    61. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, it should be easy for a mechanic to distinguish between an "authentic" brake pad and one made of cardboard. However, could they distinguish one made from certified and inspected materials and one that hasn't been?

      Working for a company in the Aerospace industry who produces parts for every major aerospace company out there (if you've ever flown, regardless of what it's been, I can almost guarantee that you've had at least one of our parts on the aircraft), I've been shocked at how some things get swept under the carpet. Granted it's not very often, but when it happens I make sure my name is nowhere near it.

      I think that's more of what the problem with this "fake" stuff is. From what I know, basically every consumer-used product has to go through testing to make sure it's safe. It then gets a UL listing stamp, or whatever else, for its "Stamp of Approval." These fake devices might show that stamp, but not be tested for safety.

    62. Re:I don't get it by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      This is a job for anti-fraud laws, not trademark laws. If you're selling a power transistor, it had better live up to the specs, either the specs given directly or the specs given indirectly by slapping a particular name onto it.

      If it meets the appropriate safety and performance specs (say, Redbook for audio CDs or ISO standards for power cables), I could care less if it's a 'genuine' brand name part or an imitation and there would be no need for trademark laws, since the quality of the imitations would be regulated by the government and enforced by the police and customs.

    63. Re:I don't get it by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Short answer. Yes.

    64. Re:I don't get it by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      It's not just electronics. There's a big problem with Motorcycles now (and probably has been for a while). Chinese companies are copying Japanese designs exactly.

      http://www.american.edu/TED/honda.htm

      They're coming to the US too. There are a lot of cheaply made Chinese dirt bikes that have engines nearly identical to the ones Honda was using in the late 1980s. One of the motorcycle boards I regularly read has a few threads of users who bought these bikes to play around with and see how they compare. In almost all cases, they are made with poor quality materials which result in cracked plastic and frames that fracture easily (not a good thing, especially on a motorcycle).

      I believe the soviets did the same thing back in the 60s and 70s.

    65. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ther should be no grey area where it is okay as long as the consumer know. I don't really have a problem with cheap imitations, as long as they don't rip off the brand name and logo of another company, that way you can be absolutely clear you are not buying a genuine product.

    66. Re:I don't get it by darkith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      NiMH batteries are generally pretty safe. They don't really require any onboard electronics, just a peak detecting charger if they're being fast-charged. If shorted, they may get *really* hot or ignite adjacent materials, but they're not as reactive as lithium based technology.

      Li-Ion/Li-Poly cells are the dangerous ones. Basically they can reach a run-away condition very easily, and lithium is *very* reactive. They can ignite if punctured, charged too fast, over-charged, or if they drop below a certain voltage and are then charged at normal rates. They will also swell/burst if over-discharged or over-heated. Most Li-Poly/Li-Ion packs include a circuit with a thermal cutoff to prevent over-heating, a circuit to prevent shorting/excessive-discharge-rates, and a circuit that isolates the pack if it drops below a safe voltage (usually around 2.5-2.8 volts per cell).

      I did purchase a pair of Li-poly batteries for a cell phone, which were no-name imports. They did not have any cutoff circuitry, and I suspect could have been nasty if they wandered out of spec (either through abuse or a defective phone). I used them with no problems though, but I think I'd reconsider, given what I know now about Lithium cells.
      That said, the circuitry required for Lithium cells is becoming cheaper everyday (the functionality is avaiable in a single chip), so I wouldn't be surprised if "decent" third-party units do have the desired safety functionality.

      D.

    67. Re:I don't get it by default+luser · · Score: 1

      What exactly was the point of your reply? It was not accurate, and it concerns CLONING, not COUNTERFEITING.

      AMD, along with Siemens and other fabs, had under-the-table agreements with Intel to produce 8088, 80286 and 80386 processors. When Intel came out with the 486, they had built enough fab capacity to tell their partners to get lost.

      AMD responded by making a faster 386 to compete with the 486, while they along with Cyrix developed 486 clones. These clones were reverse-engineered, and were 100% compatible with Intel's chips. Intel could not copyright the model number "486" because the official model name internally at Intel was "i486", so everyone used the term 486 to sell their chips.

      This is a great example of CLONING. COUNTERFEITING, on the other hand, would be like AMD producing 386 chips, slapping a replica "Intel 486" logo on the chip and selling it as such. Clones tend to be from businesses trying to make a solid reputation for themselves, and performance should reflect the claims made by their manufacturer. Counterfeit products, on the other hand, can be anything from the same product made by the very same manufacturer (but the manufacturer doesn't report them to the copyright holder, and doesn't pay licensing fees) all the way down to a completely different product made with questionable quality.

      Here's another example of classic digital counterfieting: back in the 1990s, before they put L2 cache on-die, motherboards had external cache chips. Once processor speeds started to exceed the speed of the bus by several times, the L2 cache became essential, but it was still very expensive.

      Around this time, cheap Tiawanese motherboard makers started selling boards under the brand names "ECS" and "PCChips", which were cheap and claimed to have onboard cache. Not only were the boards of piss-poor quality, the cache chips were also fake (as in, COUNTERFIET). And you wonder why people who have been around in the hardware world still bemoan the names ECS/EliteGroup/PCChips

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    68. Re:I don't get it by narsiman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, how would like to buy an Intel computer but only to find that the insides are actually made by a Chinese knockoff company.

      That happened to me. I bought a thinkpad and found out that it was a knock of from some chinese company - Lenovo or somethting.

    69. Re:I don't get it by LarsG · · Score: 4, Informative
      [grandparentquote]
      Sometimes the factories in third-world-factories that produce the "legit" products also produce those "fake" things. Is there something like this in computer electronics manufacture ?
      [/grandparentquote]

      Depends on what your definition of "fake" is. It is well known that manufacturers of, say, memory chips producing under contract/license for known brands sell surplus and not-tested-to-make-sure-the-chips-are-within-spec stock to the grey market. Which is ok, as long as there is no contract/license agreements barring the factory from doing so and the memory chips sold in this manner aren't passed off as "known brand" chips.

      Rebadging does happen, but whether it is done by the factory or by people buying surplus is a different matter.

      Intel gave AMD all necessary Information to produce the Intel 80386 Microprocessor in the early 80's then the 486. As intel could make the CPU fast enough for the Demand and outsource to AMD to manufacture them.

      AMD started selling the exactly identical chip as Intel (they had the blueprints afterall and were by authorised by Intel to produce them. :)

      Suddenly there was Intel 486 Processor versus AMD 486 processor same processor but AMD was undercutting Intel on price.

      Enter Pentium haha AMD you cant copy our name any more since it is Trademarked


      The Intel/AMD story is a bit different. When IBM put together the IBM PC they had to rush to get it out the door to compete with the myriad of personal computers that were showing up on the market. Instead of taking the traditional route of designing everything in-house, they did something that at the time was very unusual for IBM. They went outside IBM to pick the components to build the machine, including the 8088 from Intel.

      IBM was then a powerhouse, and Intel was in comparison small fry. IBM did not want to depend on a single source for the components used in the IBM PC, so in order for Intel to get the contract they had to license the x86 to a second source - AMD.

      AMD was at first a second source producer of Intel designed x86 CPUs (8086, 8088, Am286). Intel considered the licence only valid up to the 80286, so they cancelled the agreement in 1986 and lawsuit(s?) ensued. AMD kinda sorta won, and starting with the Am386 in 1991 they have designed and manufactured their own x86 compatible CPUs.
      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    70. Re:I don't get it by speculatrix · · Score: 1
      agreed, fakes when items are not safety critical is not such an issue. however, when drugs are being faked, it's much worse, for example fake viagra. I too have heard about fake brake-pads for cars which disintegrate under use. I am sure that oil and brake fluid have also been faked.

      Jokes about hardened criminals stealing viagra aside, if the fake drug is manufactured badly then the dose could be wrong, or the drug contaminated in some way, or worse, not have any active chemical agent in it and lead to the death of the person buying it.

      This is also a serious headache for the original drug manufacturer; imagine if vioxx was in fact perfectly safe but it was the knock-offs that had the problems.

    71. Re:I don't get it by LarsG · · Score: 1
      AMD, along with Siemens and other fabs, had under-the-table agreements with Intel to produce 8088, 80286 and 80386 processors. When Intel came out with the 486, they had built enough fab capacity to tell their partners to get lost.


      IBM wanted a second source so they made made Intel license the design to AMD as a requirement for IBM to choose the x86 for the IBM PC. (Makes you wonder what would have happened if they had chosen the MC68000 instead).

      Intel cancelled the license with the '386, lawsuit and settlement between AMD and Intel, AMD produced x86 clones of their own design starting with the Am386.

      What licenses and agreements Intel had with NEC, NatSemi, Siemens, Cyrix and others I don't know. Would love it if you have any information about that, though.

      (And agreed, the AMD/Intel x86 story is not at all the same as counterfeit merchandise)
      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    72. Re:I don't get it by Buran · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my car that currently has a battery drain problem due to, I suspect, the counterfeit fake Chinese ambient air temp sensor. I'm out $20+ to get a genuine part to fix the grounding problem, and I had to buy a $35 jump start battery device to solve the car's tendency to randomly die.

    73. Re:I don't get it by chronicon · · Score: 1
      > So yes, lack of quality IS a problem - it's not just IP whine.

      So are we FOR the Government this time or against it, I forgot to bring my scorecard. Apologies.

      Why did this get a 'Troll' mod? Sarcasm aside, the point is valid enough for discussion isn't it?

    74. Re:I don't get it by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      I remember the Newegg case where they were only posting good reviews and deleting the bad, but what was Pricewatch doing?

    75. Re:I don't get it by jizmonkey · · Score: 1

      Intel had to license its chips to TWO outside sources, AMD and Harris. Harris supplied alternative chips up through the 286. Even then, like AMD, they would sell faster chips than Intel (up to 20 MHz 286 chips), because Intel was holding back the clocks of its older generation to not cannibalize sales while the second sources were not.

      --
      With great power comes great fan noise.
    76. Re:I don't get it by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      where can i get me one of those?

      China. Though it's possible that some of them may be legit; many are certainly packaged very nicely.

    77. Re:I don't get it by Kesch · · Score: 1

      Is this the reason they are changing their slogan from "Intel Inside"? :-P

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    78. Re:I don't get it by LuYu · · Score: 1

      Your comments are even more ridiculous applied to music/movies. To say that a pirate has lower production costs is a rather large understatement. Producing a movie requires all sorts of expenses from paying actors, directors, stagehands, etc, to marketing. Pirating a movie requires the movie, a computer, and an internet connection. No mystery on how the pirate can "make" the movie so cheaply. Independent low budget producers/labels are a better example of how movies/music can be made more cheaply.
      Yes, we have all heard that argument. However, the vast majority of these movies pay for themselves at the box office, so the per unit cost of producing DVDs should be about the same for pirates and MPAA affiliates. The only real difference is probably the fat cat managers taking their large salaries in the MPAA approved firms.

      So, I suppose the question is: Do you enjoy feeding the families of Harvard grads?

      I certainly do not.

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    79. Re:I don't get it by LuYu · · Score: 1

      Jokes about hardened criminals stealing viagra aside, if the fake drug is manufactured badly then the dose could be wrong, or the drug contaminated in some way, or worse, not have any active chemical agent in it and lead to the death of the person buying it.
      And can you prove that the medicine you use is not acting in one or more of these ways? Can you prove that when your aunt goes for chemotherapy that it has any effect on cancer? Do you have the knowledge to discern what effects the medicine is actually having on your body? Maybe it is all snake oil. Prove it is not.

      It would be in the manufacturer's interest to harm you over the long term. You would need more medicine in the future, would you not?

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    80. Re:I don't get it by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      Yes, we have all heard that argument. However, the vast majority of these movies pay for themselves at the box office, so the per unit cost of producing DVDs should be about the same for pirates and MPAA affiliates. The only real difference is probably the fat cat managers taking their large salaries in the MPAA approved firms.

      Except that movie attendance keeps dropping and dropping. That could be due to a number of causes including legal or illegal home viewing and declining movie quality. If the studios were to release their movies on the internet for free, invariably an even larger number would wait for it to "come out on DVD".

      So, I suppose the question is: Do you enjoy feeding the families of Harvard grads?

      I certainly do not.

      If I view the price to be right, I don't mind. If I don't, then I do without. It's just entertainment (and poor quailty at that, according to most slashdotters) not some vital resource. I don't think the studios are obligated to charge anything less than people will pay.

    81. Re:I don't get it by LuYu · · Score: 1

      You probably mean the rightful manufacturer of the product. We're speaking about hardware here, so the owner would be the buyer, not the maker.
      Well put. This argument does not only apply to hardware. It really applies to information, too. Copyright holders are not the "owners" of the information they hold the rights to. The buyer is the owner of the information the buyer purchases. If you purchase a CD, you own the CD and all the information on it.

      ArsenneLupin's Axiom:

      The owner [is] the buyer, not the maker.

      Do not let anyone tell you different.

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    82. Re:I don't get it by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Intel had to license its chips to TWO outside sources, AMD and Harris.

      I knew there were other sources for Intel 808x/'286 CPUs, but I thought Intel was only buying manufacturing capacity and not giving them full licenses. Thanks for setting me straight.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    83. Re:I don't get it by default+luser · · Score: 1

      According to the Chiplist, the original second-sources for the 8088 were AMD, Harris, Siemens, Hitachi and NEC (V20).

      For the 286, it was AMD, Harris, Siemens and Fujitsu.

      For the 386, Intel cut their second-source contracts, but it seems there were quite a few clones: AMD (SX license, DX clone), Cyrix (clone, manufacturered by TI), Harris (clone), IBM (licensed 386SX), and Chips & Technologies (clone).

      There's a timeline, pictures and lots of other information at the Red Hill CPU Guide.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    84. Re:I don't get it by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I remember the Newegg case where they were only posting good reviews and deleting the bad, but what was Pricewatch doing?

      I don't think it's Pricewatch itself he was refering too, just the hoards of bottom feeders that list stuff there.

    85. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was MJ15003/MJ15004 in 2000. Mine are still alive after much abuse in my power amplifer so I'm pretty sure they were made by On Semi's Mexico plant.

    86. Re:I don't get it by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Ok. My wrong. I was referring to Li-Ion not NiMH. Stupid old me!

      Not that it is so important, the point in the parent was that fake cellphone batteries can explode if they are made with bogus components.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    87. Re:I don't get it by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you brought up clothing. I sat on a jury for a case being brought against a clothing counterfeiter, and from the evidence brought up in the trial, the workmanship was horrid. After that trial, I'll definitely never purchase anything that I know or suspect is counterfeit, if I care at all about the quality.

      The biggest eye opener was actually the counterfeit Levis. Apparently the fake ones don't use as many rivets, and have lower quality seams, and so quickly deteriorate. Even though you may have paid $15 for $45 jeans, you end up having to purchase new ones far more often, which ends up costing more in the long run.

  2. Wow I'm glad he's an "expert" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Maybe it's a laptop, an MP3 player, or a component like a DVD drive--anything in the digital world can be counterfeited," says Therese Randazzo, a U.S. Customs Service counterfeiting expert.'"

    Last time I checked there captain obvious anything in the analog world can be counterfeited as well. Basically anything can be counterfeited. If this guy counts as an expert I'd hate to see a n00b.

    1. Re:Wow I'm glad he's an "expert" by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that a DVD player is "digital" in the same sense that a coffee mug is liquid.

    2. Re:Wow I'm glad he's an "expert" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/guy/gal/ ?

    3. Re:Wow I'm glad he's an "expert" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that at the very least, Therese Randazzo can distinguish men from women - unlike certain Slashdotters. Way to go, Captain Oblivious!

    4. Re:Wow I'm glad he's an "expert" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, Therese is a male name.

    5. Re:Wow I'm glad he's an "expert" by WheresMyDingo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Basically anything can be counterfeited. If this guy counts as an expert I'd hate to see a n00b.

      Maybe he's a counterfeit expert?

    6. Re:Wow I'm glad he's an "expert" by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Maybe it should be "nearly anyone can almost perfectly counterfeit anything in the digital world". It is MUCH harder to counterfeit analog stuff, try counterfitting the Mona Lisa, not an easy thing to do.

      --
      Q.
    7. Re:Wow I'm glad he's an "expert" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, any digital information can be almost perfectly copied but that's not what he's trying to say. He's talking about physical products that just happen to play digital files. Which doesn't make sense, the fact that a piece of equipment uses digital files doesn't have anything to do with how easy it is to counterfeit it.

  3. don't by stuff from men in vans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    and you'll probably be alright

    1. Re:don't by stuff from men in vans by metricmusic · · Score: 1

      Or heavy trenchcoats. In fact, don't even look their way in case they open up and you see too much (or too little!)

      --
      http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    2. Re:don't by stuff from men in vans by geobeck · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that the 'men in vans' aren't opening their vans on street corners; they're wholesaling to unsuspecting retailers. So if, say, WalMart were to dump a supplier because someone else gave them a lower price (WalMart would do this? Never!), they might be buying counterfeit crap. (WalMart? Sell crap? Never!)

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    3. Re:don't by stuff from men in vans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I like ice-cream!

    4. Re:don't by stuff from men in vans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shoes or the vehicle?

    5. Re:don't by stuff from men in vans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dogg Digital and the other white van speaker sellers usully don't sell counterfeit products. They just get you to believe that you are buying grey market and the brands just sound similar to really nice names since many people wouldn't know the difference.

  4. Cheap fake or the real thing? by frinkacheese · · Score: 1


    I would much rather and have in the past purchased a cheap fake rather than over priced branded kit. It all works, is usually useless in a few years anyway and since it was much cheaper, if it dies in a year or two then you can be happy you got that much use form it and buy another cheap fake.

    China, dudes, bring on the fakes!

    1. Re:Cheap fake or the real thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Mongolia and a lot of "counterfit" stuff comes up from China. What I have found, and it has been confirmed by very reliable sources is that a lot of what is called "counterfit" is actually legit stuff stolen by the managers at the factories where it is built. It is a common and accepted practice in many Asian countries. That is why it can be sold affordibly priced.

      On another tangent, I can buy DVD's for $1.00USD a piece, so I usually buy several a week. The quality is usually pretty good as most are advanced screening copies or have "For Acadamy consideration only". When I was in North America last I purchased 3 DVD's which I was pretty sure I would never see here. For example the Trailer Park Boys, The Corporation and Half Baked.

      Tmax

    2. Re:Cheap fake or the real thing? by xodonex · · Score: 0, Insightful

      As the article shows, not all cheap fakes work equally well. Some fakes, however, work so well that nobody find out that they're fake. Therein lies the whole problem: as a consumer, there is no effective method of discriminating the fake from the genuine before you buy - but afterwards it may be too late (defect product, no service).

    3. Re:Cheap fake or the real thing? by ddx+Christ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Uh, slow down partner.

      This isn't talking about cheap fakes. Instead, you're getting unreliable fakes for the brand price. You're getting ripped off twice as much. That's not good at all, no matter what spin you put on it. I think you're confusing this with just getting stuff dirt cheap from China. The article focuses on the fakes commonly being put in place of the real goods.

    4. Re:Cheap fake or the real thing? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      What you need to do is not buy counterfits but grey market.

      Fools thing think that buying a Sony branded camcorder battery means it's better than the same battery from young-fung-shoo batteries that are the SAME sony battery but with no labels and a black sticker over the "sony" molded in the case.

      I get them as well as Canons greay market batteries because the plastic is deformed or something else makes them unsuitable to gouge the consumer at full price but work just fine and simply do not look perfect.

      Canon Xl1 high capacity batteries I get for $35.99 compared to the $129.95 at the local Normans.

      I intentionally look for offbrand or grey market accessories. they typically are the same as at massively lower prices making so I can afford more toys for the same $$$.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Cheap fake or the real thing? by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

      Same here.

      I've bought two different batteries for two different electronic devices so far that were "cheap." Both were advertised as being "for" the brand of device I used, but were not necessarily passed off as made by that brand's manufacturer. When I got the devices, they looked exactly the same as the OEM, except there was no brand label on them. Otherwise they look and feel just like The Real Thing(r), but for perhaps half the cost.

      Of course, there is the chance that one day these sorts of purchases will blow up in my face (either figuratively or literally), but so far I've had a good experience. Then again, this isn't exactly what the article is talking about, so this is somewhat OT.

    6. Re:Cheap fake or the real thing? by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      RTFA... This isn't talking about more cheaply made third party alternatives, those still have atleast some basic level of support from their manufacturer and are labeled as such. What this article is talking about is people actually making a product themselves, and then selling it as a product made by someone else. That means it has no warantee at all and there is almost no way to track it back to the people who originally made it when something goes wrong or worse yet, someone gets hurt. That is what this article is talking about. There is a very big difference between that and third party accessories, which are perfectly fine and perfectly legal.

      --
      AJ Henderson
  5. Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by Statecraftsman · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've decided to offer my own consumer hardware....ummm....authentication service. If you suspect you are in posession of counterfeit hardware(expecially the xbox 360 or an iPod nano), please send it it to:

    P.O. Box 12345
    Hometown, USA 12345

    Please note that due to cost concerns, your hardware cannot be returned. Thanks and if you include your email address I'll let you know if it's counterfeit.

    (just a joke...please don't actually send me anything cuz that address is extreme bogusness)

    1. Re:Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      please don't actually send me anything cuz that address is extreme bogusness)

      I used to run a dispach system for on road service. Occasionally we would inject a test job "Mr Test T Test requires a new Test for his Toyota Test at 1 Test Street Test town" or similar and most of the time the job would get sent out into the real world.

      I suggest you set up a real address and make off with the loot. It can hardly be less honest than selling advertising space by the pixel on a single page website.

    2. Re:Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Heh. Just set up a website for people convinced a particular piece of hardware is possessed by the devil. Invite them to send it in, and the bad karma associated with the device will go away.

      When you make your second million, drop me a postcard.

    3. Re:Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by WoodieR · · Score: 1

      what amount of postage should I put on it, as I live in Antown, Ontario, Canada and shipping to the US is gonna be like $50, so should I just put $60 worth of stamps on it, and hope you get it ?

      --
      Question Authority before IT questions You ...
    4. Re:Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by WoodieR · · Score: 3, Funny

      when you make your second million, drop me the first ...

      --
      Question Authority before IT questions You ...
    5. Re:Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by Jinsaku · · Score: 2, Funny

      I work at a Satellite TV company, and I heard stories that back in "the day", about 4 or 5 years ago Q&A and development would test with production data, as there apparently was no way at the time to differentiate between test and prod accounts. So, one of the things everyone did was put the words (in big bold capital letters) "DO NOT INSTALL" on address line 2, and the full address was real, but with a fake apartment number like "#545329823098234" or something.

      Apparently, one of the big reasons they ended up setting up a test system was due to money loss from installers trying to find apartment #545329823098234 on "DO NOT INSTALL" lane. :P

      --
      -- Jinsaku
    6. Re:Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the Zip Code for the General Electric plant in Schenectady, NY.

      If you plan on creating a new revenue stream for them, I don't think they'd mind.

    7. Re:Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      In the unlikely event that someone responds to your "offer" you might actually be disappointed - the last MP3 player that I saw that was "very similar looking" to the iPod Nano was at an airport in Singapore - named something like the "i-Poo 5000". It appeared to be a low capacity flash player.

    8. Re:Act now to stop hardware counterfeiting by Busy · · Score: 1

      Your PO box is the same as the lock combination on my luggage...

      --
      Think of someone with average intelligence. Now think 1/2 the world is dumber than that guy.
  6. hmm laptops by fireiceviperhotmail. · · Score: 1

    i wonder what can be fake about a laptop ? i mean does it still work ? maybe this is were the stolen amd cpu's went ....

    Julien. http://free.hostdepartment.com/8/81fortune/

    1. Re:hmm laptops by Plocmstart · · Score: 1

      I remember reading an article about some company taking Celerons and selling them as Pentium 4s, so you may get something "cheaper." Plus when you buy something with a certain company brand on it then it breaks, you may tend to have a worse perception of that company and go for another brand instead next time. Of course people should use the rule of thumb that if it looks too good to be true it probably is.
      So long as you aren't being tricked into buying something that it really isn't, or a company name isn't being used that doesn't belong to the manufacturer I don't see any issue with generics though.

    2. Re:hmm laptops by Newtonian_p · · Score: 1

      As someone posted earlier, they might be laptops made by the same factory that produces the real thing but which did not pass QA testing.

      --

      There are 2 kinds of people in this world: Those who write in decimal and those who don't

  7. Is this the real /. by SecondHand · · Score: 2, Funny

    or some fake. How to tell?

    1. Re:Is this the real /. by hexdcml · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The fake ones have less dupes!

      --
      Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    2. Re:Is this the real /. by aurb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You can tell it from the dupes.

    3. Re:Is this the real /. by ThePatrioticFuck · · Score: 1

      or some fake. How to tell?

      Wait for the dupe?

    4. Re:Is this the real /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol no this is not a fake

  8. Wait till you see... by bronney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what we have in stores for you. Earlier we had soy sauce made from hair juice. Yes, factories in China grinding human hair into juice and mix with water.

    Fake down blankets stuffed with shit polyesters.

    Now hear this, fake EGGS. Yes you heard right. What mogglers my bind was how on earth could you make eggs cheaper than collecting from chickens. The fake eggs were obviously inedible, but will crack and pour just like a real egg, with yolks and stuff.

    The famous fake gucci's and LV's are old news.

    Latest that came in from a buddy who works in shenzhen was that he rode in a fake mercedes benz. They copied all contours and instead of the tri-star, it's a 5 pointed-star (China)! Cool eh.

    1. Re:Wait till you see... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      mogglers my bind

      Tell me, exactly what does moggle your bind?

      rode in a fake mercedes benz

      A company here was putting Ferrari-like fibreglass shells on to TA22 Celica bodies. This was about 20 years ago. They got taken to court of course.

      Thanks for the soy sauce story. I will feel real happy about my wife's cooking now. After the Dec 26 2004 tsunami there was a run on fish based sauce in Malaysia because people thought it would start to contain human tissue because fish feed on bodies. Your version sounds slightly worse.

    2. Re:Wait till you see... by wodgy7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In case anyone doubts the fake eggs story, here's a photo of one of the phony eggs: http://news.xinhuanet.com/photo/2004-12/28/content _2387255.htm The shell is made from calcium carbonate and the internals are mixed up (there's no defined yolk) and made from a mixture of gelatine, starch, alum, and a variety of other things.

    3. Re:Wait till you see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earlier we had soy sauce made from hair juice. Yes, factories in China grinding human hair into juice and mix with water.

      Yeah, it makes sense, because obviously, human hair is much easier to come by than soy beans. Geeez...

      Are you really that much of a sucker?

    4. Re:Wait till you see... by bronney · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, I ain't no sucker. I live in hong kong and this hair soy sauce story made the 7pm news. That's because they weren't just making it and sell as no frills. They counterfeited an existing brand and trade it all over mainland, just not hong kong.

    5. Re:Wait till you see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You do know that most breads are made with l-cysteine that is sourced from human hair in Asia, right? L-cytsteine is additive 920 (and an alternative form is 921), and it is sourced mostly from human hair, or animal hair and feathers - it makes the dough more pliable and stretchy apparently.

      Makes you wonder why they made soy sauce out of it, rather than selling the human hair to the normal market - other food manufacturers :)

  9. Yeah except it costs the same by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If I get a item that is 50% less for 50% of the cost I basically get the same deal. However if I buy a nokia battery that normally sells for 100 and instead accidently buy a fake for 80 and it then explodes I might feel that it is not such a good deal.

    Yeah "fakes" can work. In a way the PC your sitting behind right now is a "fake". Unless your a rich bastard sitting behind a IBM or Apple machine.

    This article is however not about those kind of fakes. It is where the buyer presumes he is buying the real deal often for the real price. That is not good.

    Same with software, you can hold a lengthy argument about software piracy but when I pay full price for a software package I would expect to get a real offical copy.

    By all means, make cheap memory or hd or mp3 players but don't try to pass it of as a superior product and charge the same money.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yeah except it costs the same by systmoadownfreak · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I don't mind paying less, but at least tell me what I'm buying. Don't try and pass it off as something that it's not. And definently don't try and charge the same as a name brand for an inferior product. Honestly a lot of the time the only thing you sacrifice with a lesser known company is that you don't get the reputation or customer service associated with major corporations. If you're cool without that stuff, then by all means buy the knock-off.

    2. Re:Yeah except it costs the same by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Crap for Real-deal prices is horrible.

      However, I gotta argue with you on the 50% less for 50% of the cost bit.

      Say a branded laptop costs 1200 and lasts 6 years. Now, say the cheapy fake is 600 for 3 years. Assume factors other than price and lifespan constant.

      Three years down the line, Moore's law states that the computers coming out will be four times the nice.

      The person who bought the cheapy fake now is forced into buying a much better computer (his old one failed for one reason or another. Let's hope it's not the harddrive). The dude who got a Dell is still stuck with his relatively old paperweight.

      Point is, an very good argument can be made for substandard equipment. Additionally, the situation I've stated isn't realistic. Less lifespan almost always leads to less reliability: the HD may randomly lose a byte here and there; the USB may be noisy; the sound card may be SO obscure that even Linux fails to support it; the network card may not work at all after the first minute of use. I've had this shit happen before.

      Which, of course, is why I won't buy high-branded products. You either buy from the manufacturer at a bloated price, or you buy from somewhere else, and can't know where it really came from. It's true for brands less lofty than Creative Labs and Intel, but less likely. Who have you heard of conterfeiting Crystal Semiconductor and VIA products?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  10. Dupe? by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not a dupe? Hey, whoever counterfeited Slashdot, back to work!

  11. Cheap by koolman2 · · Score: 1

    No wonder they were so cheap here! :-D

    (I'm in Anchorage)

  12. factories in China just keep production runs going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've read that when a company is done with a factory in China making their product, you will then see the factory "illegally" keep producing a product sometimes. Or the process will be copied by another factory. Hence the label of "fake". Then it comes down to if a fake is a fake if it's identical but doesn't carry the name brand or authorization of the name brand (where the answer is probably yes).

  13. This speaks pretty poorly for online sales... by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

    "To discover how prevalent counterfeit high-tech parts have become in the United States, PC World purchased seven hard drives, seven memory modules, and ten cell phone batteries online, using pricing search engines to find low prices. We then asked vendors to authenticate the gear. Of the two dozen products we bought, four (all cell phone batteries) were counterfeit. We also received at least one old or refurbished product masquerading as new, got one broken drive, and in a few cases ordered a specific brand but received a cheaper brand in its place. Worse, our reporter had his credit card number stolen and misused multiple times during the course of researching this story. Ultimately, only 15 of the 24 items we bought turned out to be exactly as advertised."

    Damn - it's a jungle out there. It makes you wonder about the future of e-commerce vs. touch-it-before-you-buy-it stores if there is so much online fraud and it is such a PITA to fix/return the problem product.

    OTOH, in years of buying hundreds of books from Amazon, they messed up my order only once, and they promptly "fixed" (refunded) it when I sent back the improper item.

    It makes sense, though. When you don't have a physical location/person to track down, and your money is already in their bank, it is much harder to get a refund for defective goods, so the PITA factor means a lot of people wont bother. And thus, an online retailer has much less incentive (vs. a brick and mortar store) to be sure of the quality of their goods since the return percentage will be less anyway.

    1. Re:This speaks pretty poorly for online sales... by goodcow · · Score: 0

      First of all, you shouldn't just go to Froogle, search for the lowest price, and buy something from BOB'S DISCOUNT ELECTRONICS which has a horrible seller rating and expect to get something worthwhile. Sticking to reputable sellers like Amazon for instance, you're not going to have a problem, and customer service is there as well. Failing all that, it's not difficult at all to call VISA up and get a chargeback done within a few minutes. Why even deal with arguing with a shady online store. If they screw up the order or scam you in some way, contact them making it very clear that if it isn't corrected immediately, you're going to call VISA and initiate a chargeback. If they still wanna play games, then don't waste the time or energy, just call VISA.

    2. Re:This speaks pretty poorly for online sales... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      "using pricing search engines to find low prices."

      I have to wonder how far they went to get a low price; I don't know about you, but I've seen plenty of web sites that look like they were put together by a 12 year old with attention span issues, and I wouldn't put my credit card anywhere near them, however cheap they were...

      In a decade or so of buying online, I've had a CPU that arrived dead (squished, in fact; the packaging AMD had put it and the heatsink in had cracked, and the heatsink had crushed it), a graphics card whose fan died a month after purchase, and a couple of network cables that weren't what I expected because I hadn't read the site carefully enough.

      So, I have to suspect, if you're just a little more careful with where you shop online, you shouldn't have experiences quite that bad!

  14. No please tell me it isn't so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't sell me counterfeit dildos. I'll be all hot and horny, and let down.

  15. REAL goods, FAKE labels by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "In October 2004, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials in Anchorage, Alaska, seized 20,000 suspected fake Memorex USB memory key thumb drives from Asia."

    Do Memorex even make USB drives, or do they simply buy them in from Asian and stick their badge on them?

    "Miami officials seized 900 allegedly phony laptops valued at $700,000. "Maybe it's a laptop, an MP3 player, or a component like a DVD drive--anything in the digital world can be counterfeited," says Therese Randazzo, a U.S. Customs Service counterfeiting expert.'"

    I bet they were *real* laptops and *real* mp3 players, the only difference was the label. What you're saying is they can fake *labels*. But that's just because the USA has become a fake brand country, companies license a brand like Polaroid or Caterpillar, buy in cheap Asian crap, stick a "Polaroid" badge on it and charge loads more money because people think they're buying American.

    Who cares if those fake brands get pirated, since its the difference between an overprice Asian product and a cheap Asian product, it's still jobs in Asia.

    They should tackle false origin of goods labelling instead, since that's the cause of jobs being lost in USA and Europe. How can an Italian shoe maker compete with companies which appear to be Italian luxury show makers, but are just fake Asian brands with some minor finishing in Italy?

    1. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by 99luftballon · · Score: 1

      This is especially true for laptops. Given that two Taiwanese box shifters make over half of all laptops and the brander just stick a label on them then a 'fake' one seems like pretty good value if you can get the same hardware for less.

    2. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by patio11 · · Score: 1
      How can an Italian shoe maker compete with companies which appear to be Italian luxury show makers, but are just fake Asian brands with some minor finishing in Italy?

      a) Using that whole fine hand crafted aesthetic to create a look which cannot be functionally duplicated by someone making 500 pieces a day with no specialized training or
      b) going into an industry where the above is actually possible, because any industry where it isn't is doomed in Italy and everywhere else in the first world, just as it will be doomed in China 20 years from now.

    3. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      -Do Memorex even make USB drives, or do they simply buy them in from Asian and stick their badge on them?- Well, I've got one right here. Quite small, 1GB, fairly inexpensive, got it from BBUY... Hope it's real!

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    4. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by fishbot · · Score: 1

      "Miami officials seized 900 allegedly phony laptops valued at $700,000. "Maybe it's a laptop, an MP3 player, or a component like a DVD drive--anything in the digital world can be counterfeited," says Therese Randazzo, a U.S. Customs Service counterfeiting expert.'"

      His final sentence could have read "anything in the world can be counterfeited." without losing any meaning what-so-ever, considering that the items in question are real, tangible goods. The throwing in of the word 'digital' just seems intent on dragging the debate into software or media piracy ...

    5. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by tpgp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I bet they were *real* laptops and *real* mp3 players, the only difference was the label. What you're saying is they can fake *labels*. But that's just because the USA has become a fake brand country, companies license a brand like Polaroid or Caterpillar, buy in cheap Asian crap, stick a "Polaroid" badge on it and charge loads more money because people think they're buying American.

      I generally agree with your sentiment about Western Consumers getting sucked into overpaying for cheap crap because of a label (CK clothes instantly spring to mind).

      However - I do actually think trademark is one area of 'intellectual property' that helps consumers.

      If I buy a laptop that has "AMD Sempron 3000+" written on it, I would like to *know* that that's what it is - not an 900MHz Intel Celeron. Similarly, I want the video memory to be whats advertised, etc etc etc.

      Who cares if those fake brands get pirated, since its the difference between an overprice Asian product and a cheap Asian product, it's still jobs in Asia.

      Sometimes you do not get a rebranded equivilant, but something that is completely inferior to what you expected.

      I would be extemely pissed off if I bought one of the Fake AMD CPUs that were going around a while ago, to find it overclocked, ran hotter, and had a shorter lifespan that it should.

      --
      My pics.
    6. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by ddx+Christ · · Score: 1
      I bet they were *real* laptops and *real* mp3 players, the only difference was the label. What you're saying is they can fake *labels*. But that's just because the USA has become a fake brand country, companies license a brand like Polaroid or Caterpillar, buy in cheap Asian crap, stick a "Polaroid" badge on it and charge loads more money because people think they're buying American.

      Yeah, and the stuff they sell on NYC streets are of great quality.

      No, they're not. It's more than just a fake label. They're usually lower quality goods along with a fake label. Sometimes they may be of equal quality, but that is unusual. This goes for most counterfeit goods. I was sold a counterfeit hard drive several years back. It was some cheap drive slapped into a quality drive's box. I was rather disappointed when I found out but the company did replace it without a hassle.

    7. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that there are only 3 or 4 companies that produce hard drives.

    8. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by British · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that. I bought a cheap 18 dollar drill from the brand "Tool Shop". I looked at the drill next to it, which was by Black & Decker. Different color, same exact plastic moulding for the drill body, but for over twice the price.

    9. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I generally agree with your sentiment about Western Consumers getting sucked into overpaying for cheap crap because of a label (CK clothes instantly spring to mind).

      Really? Is Calvin Klein (I assume that's who you mean by CK) all overpriced cheap crap? I don't buy a lot of brand name stuff, but I did buy a pair of CK jeans some years back, admittedly in the sale as I wouldn't of paid full price, but they were still expensive. Anyway they fit a lot better than any other pair of jeans I have bought and have worn a lot better (no holes in them yet) as opposed to newer cheap jeans I have bought, in this particular case it was worth the extra money.

    10. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by pintomp3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i bet they weren't *real* laptops and mp3 players. most of the knockoff electronics are simply made to look legit, not function. i doubt you can make a functioning powerbook for much cheaper than apple. i remember my uncle brought me this "video recorder" once (long story about how he got it). it totally looked like a sony handycam. but when you pressed eject, the space was for an audio cassette. sure enough, i put in a tape and it played back the audio. in the front was a film camera. i'm not sure why they went through the time to design all of that. clearly this is not a case of "the only difference was the label". i've also seen a minolta slr that totally looked legit also, til i noticed the thumbwheel to wind the film. i agree that a lot of products, especially non-electronics are often simply label-whoring. but most electronics items don't have the mark up that prada bags do. btw, if you go to chinatown, you will find that the quality clearly well below the real ones. but a fake prada bag will still hold your stuff as well as a real one. that fake camcorder couldn't record video.

    11. Re:REAL goods, FAKE labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is HUGE difference between

      Designed and made in China

      and

      Designed in Germany and made in Malaysia

      Designing a product in some cases counts for the majority of the costs(software, books, movies).

      How about if you copy something without knowing how it works? Maybe they left out something they deemed wasn't important. How about untested integrated circuits? If Nvidia chips were 99% good off the line, would you care if you got that 1% at half price?

  16. Windows by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think my copy of windows may be counterfeit. Its really slow and every time I open internet explorer I keep getting directed to hardcore porn sites.

    1. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you've got to complain about it?

    2. Re:Windows by thanextgeneration · · Score: 2, Funny

      that's not counterfeit that's just a 'feature' :P

    3. Re:Windows by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope, that is the Windows Genuine Advantage.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  17. But does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they run a counterfeit version of Linux?

    1. Re:But does it run Linux? by legalize.ganja.now. · · Score: 2, Funny

      no. they run a counterfeit version of minix.

  18. So where does the customer stand... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...after they've brought a SHINY brand camcorder with lettering that might have said SONY if you didn't look closely enough. Is that a counterfeit?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:So where does the customer stand... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      IANAL but that may fit into trademark infringement due to confusion by the consumer but it would probably be a difficult case to win.

  19. Suspected/Alleged? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    In October 2004, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials in Anchorage, Alaska, seized 20,000 suspected fake Memorex USB memory key thumb drives from Asia. And last year, Miami officials seized 900 allegedly phony laptops valued at $700,000.

    Nothing like some cold, hard facts to back up the case.

    1. Re:Suspected/Alleged? by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      It just means the cases mentioned are still pending, but the court of public opinion has already ruled.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  20. I'm cool with all this... by nodnarb1978 · · Score: 1

    ...as long as they don't start importing counterfeit Penis Mightiers. Because, what matter is, do they work?

    1. Re:I'm cool with all this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Anal Bum Covers

  21. OK, so how do we mod _this_ reply? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    +1, Appropriate Demonstration?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  22. Reality.. by PhakeDC · · Score: 0

    .. is just a point of view, so I named myself Phake, a parody on the whole genuinity thing. As for counterfeit hardware I guess nowadays it doesn't matter much now all the components are cheaply made, the difference lies in how much effort the manufacturers put into their hardware to make it look as genuine as possible.

    1. Re:Reality.. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      You're too young to be so jaded and cynical. Who hurt you, son?

      Heh, I'm just kidding, I don't really give a fuck about you. Carry on then.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    2. Re:Reality.. by PhakeDC · · Score: 0

      Well obviously a troll did :P

  23. What's next, counterfeit jeans? by fufinache · · Score: 1

    In an interview with police chief Wiggum, Wiggum reports that they are unable to apprenhend the suspects because the evidence has "mysteriously disappeared". I wonder if anyone can even remember this reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Springfield_Conne ction

    1. Re:What's next, counterfeit jeans? by Tharian · · Score: 1

      "Looking good, boys. Looking good."

      --
      I'm not a nerd. I'm a geek. Nerds make more money.
  24. Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by puzzled · · Score: 5, Informative


      A Cisco dual channel T1 controller, part VWIC-2MFT-T1 is $2,000 new list price. A small reseller will pay 70% of list or about $1,400 for it in distribution, while a large reseller might only pay $1,100 or so. Below we see a tinyurl link to an Ebay auction for a new boxed unit at only $227 or 11.3% of list price. I guarantee if you contact the seller you can get six dozen of them for the same price.

    http://tinyurl.com/ak9by

      This has gone on and on and on and on for the last two years, destroying the value of used Cisco gear we pull from customers and making it almost impossible to buy a used/refurbished card without running into this stuff.

      I found out about this sort of thing the hard way. I got a *fantastic* deal on six new in the box Cisco 1721 routers. It wasn't so fantastic when I had to explain to my biggest customer that half of the machines they owned couldn't be registered for service because Cisco had them listed as in service in South America. Oh, and they failed, one by one, with mysterious problems not attributeable to hardware or software ... they just acted ... different.

      Foo on all counterfeiters. They should be given counterfeit lifesaving drugs while riding in an ambulance equipped with counterfeit brake pads on their way to a hospital where they'll be cared for by a doctor who is really a drunken paramedic who thought it'd be fun to be a trauma surgeon for a day. If they live through that then they should be placed in a real live jail and periodically offered counterfeit parole papers to sign.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by gregorio · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A Cisco dual channel T1 controller, part VWIC-2MFT-T1 is $2,000 new list price. A small reseller will pay 70% of list or about $1,400 for it in distribution, while a large reseller might only pay $1,100 or so. Below we see a tinyurl link to an Ebay auction for a new boxed unit at only $227 or 11.3% of list price. I guarantee if you contact the seller you can get six dozen of them for the same price.
      Maybe because most Cisco's products are just cheap versions of industry standard hardware designs. This card is mostly a cheap-ass FPGA with a small associated analog circuitry. I bet the counterfeiters don't even need to copy Cisco's firmware (probably licensed from some cheap-ass chinese company), as most T1-related signal processing algorithms can be licensed for free or just real cheap.

      Any chinese company can build this kind of product, as the related technologies (and component prices) can be complex as manufacturing an ADSL modem.

      But that's Cisco TODAY. Back in The Day when the components and technologies necessary to build a T1 signal interface were really expensive, their prices at least made some sense. Today the amount of signal processing necessary for a full-featured ADSL modem is larger than for this kind of communications card.

      Today's Cisco is just a seller of overpriced commodity hardware.
    2. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by jmichaelg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Cisco is plagued by counterfits.

      If Cisco outsources the manufacture of the hardware how can it possibly believe that the manufacturer won't run an extra X copies off the line after they've run Cisco's? Sure, your contracts may prohibit that but when the cost vs what Cisco charges the end user is so great, the temptation for someone at the manufacturing line is going to be pretty high. Especially if they figure they'll sell the goods in a market where Cisco isn't.

      There are reasons on-shore companies used to do the manufacturing themselves. This is one of them.

      Outsourcing may be cheaper in the short run but Cisco is beginning to learn what the long-run costs are.

    3. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by NaCl · · Score: 1

      Foo on all counterfeiters. They should be given counterfeit lifesaving drugs while riding in an ambulance equipped with counterfeit brake pads on their way to a hospital where they'll be cared for by a doctor who is really a drunken paramedic who thought it'd be fun to be a trauma surgeon for a day. If they live through that then they should be placed in a real live jail and periodically offered counterfeit parole papers to sign.

      Don't make life so complicated. Just shoot them in the head, for god's sake!

      --
      I shot the sheriff
    4. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      If they live through that then they should be placed in a real live jail and periodically offered counterfeit parole papers to sign.

      And when they get raped, it should be with counterfeit condoms.

      Thomas-

    5. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by anticypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a ton of counterfeit Cisco goods on the market, they all come from the same Flextronics plant in Suzhou, China where Cisco makes 40% of all its electronics. The cards are exactly the same as Cisco cards, but the firmware is sometimes different, and they are missing the official Cisco logo. They have the same part numbers as their Cisco counterpart. I'm pretty certain these are cards which failed QA/QC in the plant, and are re-sold without the Cisco logo.

      These cards are the bane of support people. When you yank a failing card and realise you can't call TAC, the customer is screwed.

      There are a lot of used equipment resellers in Europe with these cards and chassis, they come in through Rotterdam by the container load. You can pick up a non-branded, fully loaded 12008 for a few thousand euros, a 2811 for about 100 euros, and a palette of 1720s with ADSL WICs for 20 euros each. At those prices, you don't bother about TAC support, you just buy extras as spares and swap out anything that fails. The MTTF is usually under a year, so it's still Caveat Emptor.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    6. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by Wonko · · Score: 1

      These cards are the bane of support people. When you yank a failing card and realise you can't call TAC, the customer is screwed.

      Why pay for support and wait for a replacement parts when you can just buy your own spares for a fraction of the cost? :p

    7. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      I always wonder when their large customers start asking why Cisco-produced hardware is so much more expensive than, say, Dell or HP-produced hardware, and they still require service contracts to keep it running.

      I would say either you make and sell it at todays electronics prices and then let the customer pay for service, you you have them pay premium prices and then service it for free.

    8. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      http://toolhaus.org/cgi-bin/negs?Dirn=Received+by& User=*cisco*networking Toolhaus.org Negative/Neutral Feedback received by *cisco*networking Enter an eBay user ID: Feedback Score: 524 Positive Feedback: 99.8% Members who left a positive: 525 Members who left a negative: 1 All positive feedback received: 758 762 feedback received by *cisco*networking (2 ratings mutually withdrawn) Comment From Date / Time Item # Looks ok, the screws dont quite screw in though Buyer scouserholmes ( 77Feedback score is 50 to 99) Nov-12-05 03:22 5819534590 Rating Mutually Withdrawn: Buyer and seller mutually agreed to withdraw feedback for this item. Learn more. Dec-23-05 21:25 Negative feedback rating COUNTERFEIT EQUIPMENT. AVOID. COUNTERFEIT EQUIPMENT. REPORTING TO CISCO Buyer pm-networks(private) Oct-07-05 03:33 5815299687 Reply by *cisco*networking: Vicious comment due to unprincipled competition Oct-13-05 03:32 Neutral feedback rating purchased via second chance offer from another buyer. did not purchase Buyer eray0967 ( 7 ) Sep-24-05 11:47 5811780327 Reply by *cisco*networking: never pay for this item Oct-13-05 03:36 Has this shipped to us yet? My records say that we haven't received it. Buyer d-j-anderson12 ( 5 ) Jul-27-05 10:25 5788004153 Reply by *cisco*networking: goods shipped via Fedex 848559713321, a misunderstanding due to wrong address Jul-29-05 02:53 Rating Mutually Withdrawn: Buyer and seller mutually agreed to withdraw feedback for this item. Learn more. Aug-19-05 15:05 Total: 2 Negative or Neutral That took 0:04 (user 3, sys 0.2) [Killed-/graphics/vi-tag.gif-by-size] whb@haus.org negs ver. 5.66, Last modified 2005/12/12 00:06:10 (UTC)

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
    9. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by anticypher · · Score: 1

      Why pay for support and wait for a replacement parts when you can just buy your own spares for a fraction of the cost?

      Because you don't always know where the client bought the counterfeit card in the first place. It works if some Chinese guy in a warehouse in Rotterdam is offering you a palette of boxes all at the same time, you put some aside for the eventual failures. But most of what I see is one-off counterfeits that were sold to a client at Cisco prices.

      Sometimes when I get called to look at dead network, I find they have a half counterfeit system. At that point, the only thing I can do is search around for a used genuine Cisco system. Sometimes the replacement cost, even using a used equipment broker, is more than they paid for their whole network originally. Lots of fly-by-night web hosting services go for whatever cheap used junk they can find, and can't afford anything but counterfeit/ancient/broken kit.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    10. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-1 cards are lower volume and are much more fault tolerant than any ADSL card. Suggesting that Cisco buys T1 IP from a Chinese company proves you have no idea what you are talking about.

      FPGAs are cheap because they can be made in quantity and the IP costs are much lower than say an Athlon. ASICs are even cheaper in many cases. The actual physical costs of the ASICs I work on is probably around 5-6 cents per die. Of course, selling them at a dime each wouldn't even pay for the compute farm we needed to run our regression tests on the actual design.

      'industry standard hardware designs'?? There is no such thing. Not even commerical PCI IP cores are drop-in, not USB cores, not graphics cores, not IrDA cores, none of them are zero work.

      Any company could build what we build just as easily as I could copy any mathematics textbook.

    11. Re:Cisco is plagued by counterfeits by gregorio · · Score: 1
      T-1 cards are lower volume and are much more fault tolerant than any ADSL card. Suggesting that Cisco buys T1 IP from a Chinese company proves you have no idea what you are talking about.
      This kind of fault-tolerant-design is not such a big secret anymore, as it was 10 years ago. You can find the same level of integrated circuit complexity of a extremely-fault-tolerant T1 Card in a lot of consumer electronics like DVD-Players, Photo printers, etc. etc..

      I repeat: the technology needed for this kind of device is really old. So old that even the most complex designs can fit inside of a single unit of what I called a "cheap-ass FPGA". The kind of FPGA so cheap that you'll find better ones inside the cheapest ADSL modems in the market.

      All this "fault-tolerant" talk made sense only 10 years ago, when the required circuitry and microprocessing power needed for this kind of application was extremely expensive and had no mass-production market. Heck, today you can even BIT-BANG (software signal generation) a T1 connection with these 10-dollar embedded 400MHz SoCs that WiFi routers use these days.
      FPGAs are cheap because they can be made in quantity and the IP costs are much lower than say an Athlon. ASICs are even cheaper in many cases. The actual physical costs of the ASICs I work on is probably around 5-6 cents per die. Of course, selling them at a dime each wouldn't even pay for the compute farm we needed to run our regression tests on the actual design.
      New products really have huge development costs. But this kind of legacy stuff don't.
      'industry standard hardware designs'?? There is no such thing. Not even commerical PCI IP cores are drop-in, not USB cores, not graphics cores, not IrDA cores, none of them are zero work.
      I'm sorry, but you're just... wrong. While it's pretty obvious that there is no such thing as development with zero-work, that's not my point. I'm talking about low cost, and today's cores are pretty much drop-in. About the HW designs: reference designs can even be found for free today at any semiconductor company website. Others will cost you no more than a few thousand dollars.
      Any company could build what we build just as easily as I could copy any mathematics textbook.
      If can license a textbook's content and sell it yourself. The older the textbooks, cheaper the license.
  25. I hope they create this... by freekalater · · Score: 1

    I hope they can create a pirated fleshlight. But I wish it doesn't explode like bogus cell phone batteries. ***Kaboom*** aow dismembered....

  26. Fake laptops are almost indistinguishable by SecondHand · · Score: 3, Funny
  27. I've got a fake Music CD by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 4, Funny

    said it comes from Sony/BMG and then it was a rootkit installer. :-)

    1. Re:I've got a fake Music CD by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      the "britney spears" cover should have tipped you off that it wasn't really music

  28. Not a major consumer issue by martinmcc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't see this as being a major issue for consumers - so long as you shop at places you trust. It is up-to the retailer to ensure they are buying the ligitimate goods, not for the buyer (how is run of the mill guy going to know how to tell the difference?).

    You buy from a respectable outlet, and you use the product. If it fails, you bring it back to get it replaced. If they discover its a conterfeit, you get it replaced with the real thing (or sue if they are not forthcoming). Issue lies between outlet and supplier, not consummer and outlet.

    There is the issue pointed out that things may go boom, but I think this is over hyped. Counterfeits arn't the only thing that go boom, and again, so long as it is a tracable outlet (i.e. not the back of a van) you get it replaced or sue for damages depending on how much of a boom.

    As always - you want to buy cheap from the back of a van, you run the risk of getting malfunctioning crap and money down the drain. You buy from a reputable retailer, you still run the risk of getting malfunctioning crap, but you also you get the protection of the law if it goes pear shaped.

    1. Re:Not a major consumer issue by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Many stores, at least in the USA, will tell you that the manufacturer is responsible for fixing or replacing defective merchandise.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Not a major consumer issue by n0spamus · · Score: 1
      There is also a premise of merchantability. My understanding (from reading the Nolo Press book on Small Claims Court) is that the merchant is responsible to sell merchantable wares.

      ie. Requiring you to go to the manufacturer for something that fails after a month or two is probably legit. Refusing to accept a return (or charging a restocking fee) on something that fails right away is not legit, and can be argued in Small Claims Court in the USA.

    3. Re:Not a major consumer issue by tcgroat · · Score: 1
      Try buying a computer from almost any large chain store. They tell you explicity that if you have a warranty claim, call the manufacturer--don't bring it back to the store. They don't accept returns if the package has been opened. Stores have been burned too often by thieves buying a system, taking out new good components, and returning it full of old inferior or broken ones. It's a pain for the honest customers, but you can't blame them for protecting themselves.


      Counterfeiting the complete retail product is only part of the problem. Every level of sub-contractors can be taken in by counterfeits, too. Salvaged and rejected ICs are re-marked to look like new grade-A parts, low grade PSU capacitors are reborn with high end wrappers, not to mention the counterfeit safety approval markings. Longer supply chains mean more opportunities for inferior material to find its way into a product. Less control of the supply chain is the dark side to "outsourcing".

  29. Fake Gilette razors by Raindeer · · Score: 2, Informative

    A major Dutch retail chain recently had to recall a whole lot of Gilette Mach 3 razorblades. It turned out they were fakes. The packaging looked real enough, but the razors were nowhere near the quality Gilette makes.

    Trouble is that with globalization going on as it is, it is not unheard of for an import/export company to buy wholesale an X amount of razors, to sell most of it through their normal channels and to sell some excess surplus on the international market. Buyers would normally buy from the manufacturer, but it is hard to resist buying some of the wholesale surplus of others.

    With globalization increasing, creating a bigger marketplace and smaller margins, I would expect to see more fakes for two reasons:
    - more superfluous relationships between supply and demand instead of the traditional 1 on 1 manufacturer, wholesaler, retailer relationships. Making it easier to slip something in and be unnoticed.
    - larger markets make it more profitable to inject fake goods into the economy, by creating larger demands for products, so that the margins combined with volume creates a large enough incentive for crime to seize the chance.

    1. Re:Fake Gilette razors by value_added · · Score: 1

      A major Dutch retail chain recently had to recall a whole lot of Gilette Mach 3 razorblades. It turned out they were fakes. The packaging looked real enough, but the razors were nowhere near the quality Gilette makes.

      I'm not sure that's such a good example.

      First, razor blades are available in analog form only. And second, I doubt you'll get much sympathy from anyone who uses disposable blades (which is just about everyone) and is forced to pay ridiculous prices for them. Similarly, I doubt anyone considers the Gilette brand to have any quality than any other brand. All of them dull and clog up after a couple of shaves.

      But while we're on the subject, what I find interesting is the private label brand phenomenon. Every gas station in America, for example, seems to be offering bad coffee dressed up with Starbucks-styled names and designer-styled coffee cups. Same low-grade coffee, of course, but new packaging is supposed to make feel better about their purchase, and it seems to work.

      All in all, while there are brands that command respect, it seems that over the last decade or so that respect has eroded with the onslaught of knock-off items for a lower price and a new generation too cynical for their own good. Walmart is testimony to the fact that people often make their purchasing decision based solely on price. Is it surprising then, that a growing market exists for off-brands, dressed-up brands, or by extension, counterfeits?

    2. Re:Fake Gilette razors by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Same low-grade coffee, of course, but new packaging is supposed to make feel better about their purchase, and it seems to work.

      It's tragic how much people have become brand slaves.

      People often aren't buying high-brand products (like clothing) for the quality, but for the perceived membership of some club. The term "designer jeans" says it all, particularly designer jeans that are pre-faded or ripped.

      Real high quality clothing like hand stitched brogues or tailor made suits are hard to fake, because there is a great deal of effort going into the construction and a small amount into the marketing, where high-brand items are often cheaply made, but have a large marketing cost.

  30. Counterfeit Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think counterfeit hardware could be the next stage in trojans and viruses.

    For instance, imagine you buy a wireless router from ebay, which the seller has pre-installed with trojan firmware and comes with a packet sniffer, bulk mailing software pre-installed, ftp server, password grabber etc. The best part is, most people trust their routers implicitly so don't bother checking them from the outside world. Some people then disable their software firewalls once they have a router available.

    Another great idea would be a network printer with a trojan payload.

    1. Re:Counterfeit Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is exactly why i used openbsd in front of my off the shelf networking gear.

      local area network -> cheapo gigabit switch -> openbsd -> internet

  31. Better quality? by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

    I read in a magazine last year that children-oriented fakes like backpacks and the like were often of better quality than the real brands would produce, using better quality images or better design.

    This probably doesn't apply to electronics and computer hardware, as the fake cheap-knockoff is always of considerably less quality.

  32. Brand Italy by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    "create a look which cannot be functionally duplicated by someone making 500 pieces a day"

    If brand work for companies, then why not for countries? Isn't French cheese worth paying more for, because they don't sell French reprocessed Cheddar!
    Isn't Italian hand made shoes better because Italy doesn't make crappy cheap shoes so you're less likely to get a crappy cheap shoe if you buy Italian!

    "Made in Italy" has value just like any other brand. The problem is they don't protect that brand, they protect this fake brand companies, that set up in Italy to gain some of the Italian kudos.

  33. Microsoft does it too... by node+3 · · Score: 1

    They've been poorly counterfeiting Mac OS for years now.

    Sort of makes me think of Sir Mix-A-Lot's 'Swap Meet Louie'

    "Your OS might have windows like a Mac, but in Redmond that ain't Jack."

  34. How about brand products with fake labels? by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of consumer hardware is sold, with unchanged specifications and possibly minor cosmetic changes, using multiple brands and pricing based primarily on those brand names.
    Would this be considered counterfeit as well?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:How about brand products with fake labels? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      No, because as far as the end user is concerned, you're buying a product from company A, and that product is backed by company A's warranty and reputation. Whether they built it themselves, or bought company B's products from the market and slapped their logo over it is irrelevant.

    2. Re:How about brand products with fake labels? by geobeck · · Score: 1

      I think I've got some counterfeit monitors at the office. They say 'Trinitron', but some company called 'Dell' put their name where it should say Sony. ;)

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  35. Same thing, look at these examples by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    "If I buy a laptop that has "AMD Sempron 3000+" written on it, I would like to *know* that that's what it is - not an 900MHz Intel Celeron. Similarly, I want the video memory to be whats advertised, etc etc etc."

    Agreed, but isn't this the exact same thing:

    You're being sold "foo" when in reality it's "foobar".

    In my example, "foo" is Italian Made Designer Shoe, and "foobar" is Chinese Made shoe imported into Italy.

    In your example, "foo" is an AMD Sempron and "foobar" is an Intel Celeron.

    In both cases it's not the method of deception thats important (trademark in one, origin of goods in another), its the deception itself.

    What I think they should do is focus on origin of goods laws. That way fake Italian brands gain their protection by leveraging "Geox made in Italy", but in order to do that they have to actually make their brand in Italy! Otherwise they would be "Geox" with big "Made in China" labels stuck all over their adverts & boxes!

    Geox BTW is an example brand, that manuafacturs in China, but is based in Italy and tells different stories to each side. For example they tell the Chinese this story:

    "With a history of more than 300 years, the Geox company ranks first in Europe and eighth in the world in terms of its sales."

    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-10/1 8/content_383303.htm

    Which is bollocs because Geox is a fake brand created in the early 90's:

    http://www.ey.com/GLOBAL/content.nsf/International /EGC_-_Events_-_WEoY_-_2003_Participants

    "Italy
    Winner: Mario Moretti Polegato, President
    Company: Geox International S.r.L.S.p.A.
    Description: In seven years, Geox has become the leader in the Italian shoes market. Founded in the early 90's, Geox designs, manufactures, and markets a rubber soled shoe, allowing the foot to breathe. Geox is now the world leader in the casual shoe segment. "

    1. Re:Same thing, look at these examples by tpgp · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but isn't this the exact same thing:

      You're being sold "foo" when in reality it's "foobar".

      In my example, "foo" is Italian Made Designer Shoe, and "foobar" is Chinese Made shoe imported into Italy.


      If you indeed bought a shoe that says "Italian Made" that was actually made in China, then your example does match mine.

      However that is not the case - these shoes will say prominently "Italian designed" or similar, but have in smaller print "Made in China".

      My theoretical laptop does not have "Designed like an AMD Sempron 3000+", and in smaller print "Celeron 900"

      There is a huge difference between some advertising that is deceptive about the country of origin & fraudulently claiming one good is another.

      --
      My pics.
  36. Cisco does it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, what i mean is that Cisco is infamous for taking off-the-shelf products and then relablelling them "Cisco" and putting in a 1000x markup on it.

    No joke.

    A couple of years ago, we were trying to expand a Cisco Localdirector we owned with another ethernet card. We ordered it from Cisco and the card came. We opened the box and there was an ethernet card like you'd find in your home PC. No name, just in the Cisco packaging.

    Curious, there was no markings on any chip, except there was a UPC label on the PCB. We hunted it down through google, and wouldn't you know it was a dead stock card that cisco had removed the chip markings from. Can't remember if it was a 3com or another common name. But it was the kind you could find for $15 pretty much anywhere.

    We even popped it into a PC, and sure enough Windows XP saw it and used it as a standard card. No driver necessary.

    Had we known, we would have saved $1485 and just bought a generic.

    So now you know why Cisco has fabulous profits. They go to CompUSA, score some on-sale ethernet cards and then repackage them.

    Forgive me if I have no sympathy for them.

    1. Re:Cisco does it to themselves by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      It is the same with memory modules... a memory expansion for a Cisco router is just a bogstandard PC memory module at a 20-50 times price markup.

      Of course they blackmail you by withdrawing all service and support when you install thirdparty memory (or their distributors do this).

      When you ask about this they will babble about extra testing, certification and whatever has been done to these modules.
      It will probably be the same with your ethernet card.

      PC manufacturers sometimes try this as well, but at least their markup is less than Cisco's.

  37. Elevators too by whoda · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a story about counterfiting in an issue of Fast Company last year. In it, there was an example of an elevator company who got called to service an elevator in a high-rise building.

    The elevator company had no record that they had an elevator installed there.
    When the technicians got there, they couldn't fix anything, because the elevator wasn't really theirs. It was a knock-off!

    1. Re:Elevators too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. I'm suggesting extra protection by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    "They're usually lower quality goods along with a fake label. "

    We already have counterfeit laws on the books, which is how these goods were seized.
    I'm suggesting extra protection for brands in the form of protection from false 'country of origin goods' because that's where I think the jobs have gone.

    So genuines Italian Shoe makers can use "Made In Italy" while shoe importers or shoe finishers would have to honestly put "Made in China" on their labels. They don't have to compete with brands pretending to be expensive Italian brands while at the same time manufacturing in China.

  39. Mod parent down for aggravated assault on English! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You know, there's a "Preview" button just to the left of the "Submit" button. Had you used it, or even read the "Allowed HTML" line just below it, you might have noticed that you should have used <blockquote> instead of [quote]. Also, your capitalization, punctuation, and general grammar really, really suck. In view of that, I was very surprised not to find any spelling errors.

  40. Bad News Dude.... by amcdiarmid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even the "Italian" goods are often manufactured in third world countries.

    I can't speak specifically to shoes, but I can speak for sweaters. Production has largely moved out of shops in Italy, and into (Pakistan, Malaysia, ...) other countries. My mother in law used to own & operate a sweater assembly shop. Even using immigrant labor that was low paid by Italian standards, they could not compete with the no pay of Pakistan. (Yes, I know that the workers there are their familys breadwinners.)

    The problem of jobs moving from high paid countries to low ones is endemic, and a good example of a beggar thy neighbor approach to economic production. (You offer companies more incentives to work in your place, and let them pay less for the work.) Eventually everyone works for nothing;(

    Better country of origin laws would work if everyone was willing and able to pay more for goods made in *well paying* countries. However some sort of horrible tax regime based on how much workers receive would probably make more sense.

    my $.02 ($.02, that's more than an hourly wage in a Burma sweatshop;))

    1. Re:Bad News Dude.... by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > The problem of jobs moving from high paid countries to low ones is endemic, and a good
      > example of a beggar thy neighbor approach to economic production. (You offer companies
      > more incentives to work in your place, and let them pay less for the work.) Eventually
      > everyone works for nothing;(

      Sad, the state of economics education these days. Now class, take out your search engine and do some research. Remember Japan used to be known as the country that made crappy goods in vast quantities because they had near zero labor cost. Investigate the events of the previous fifty years and draw the only possible conclusion. Japan now has highly paid labor producing very high quality goods, so much so that they bitch and whine about cheap imported goods almost as much as Americans and Europeans do.

      South Korea is experiencing much the same, as is Tawain. India is already producing a large middle class, which is starting to consume material goods in growing quantities. China will follow along in at most a generation. Then, having nowhere else to find really cheap labor, the world will be forced to reform Africa. Once they come up to a minimum standard of living we will have to move on to some other way to keep the flow of cheap comsumer goods going, probably robots. But the point is that global trade raises the standard of living for both sides in the trade. Unequally at first, but it does balance out in the end.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  41. Re:factories in China just keep production runs go by xoip · · Score: 1

    I've read that when a company is done with a factory in China making their product, you will then see the factory "illegally" keep producing a product sometimes.
    These factories are not illegally producing the product if they are under contract to the license holder. They are guilty illegal distribution. These grey market products have been around in the clothing area since the beginning of designer clothes. Now with ebay and internet stores, there is a distribution outlet for technology hard goods that did not exist 10 years ago.

  42. This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And let's not forget the P-P-P-PowerBook incident.

    1. Re:This is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic:

      Does anyone have experience with this? :

      http://www.newssocket.com/features/article/382/

  43. Buyer beward dude by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    For all the talk brands sell dirt cheap in China, and pretend their trademark violators if you try to import those goods. Levi's used the "dilution of trademark" claim to stop Tesco's importing cheap Levis from abroad, but the goods were genunine Levi's:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1261060.stm

    I don't think a Cisco card or two on eBay from a seller in Beijing are exactly a big deal personally, and I wonder why you imagined Cisco would register and support routers you bought from China on eBay???

    1. Re:Buyer beward dude by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Levi's sell jeans to company. What that company does with them is their business, not Levi's. It's no longer yours to control.

      It's whiny, anti-free market and it stinks.

      Levi's can shove their jeans. I won't pay their full price anyway. Not when Tesco are selling their own for less than a fiver a pair. I can buy a pair of jeans, and have enough left over for a skinful, curry and a taxi home for less.

  44. WYPIWYG by cciRRus · · Score: 1
    ...counterfeit stuff is almost certainly poor quality, possibly bordering on dangerous. it makes the most sense as you get maximum profits that way...
    In other words... What You Pay Is What You'll Get.
    --
    w00t
  45. Not all trademark infringements are so serious by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    "owever that is not the case - these shoes will say prominently "Italian designed" or similar, but have in smaller print "Made in China"."

    So it's a matter of degrees, what I'm after for this current round of counterfeiting laws is strong origin of goods laws, and the counterfeiting to concentrate on origin of goods. So that the origin of goods is stuck right there on the advert, the top of the box etc.

    "There is a huge difference between some advertising that is deceptive about the country of origin & fraudulently claiming one good is another"

    You took an extreme case, which would be a fraud + trademark infringement, but that doesn't mean all trademark infringements are as serious as fraud.

    Suppose:
    Memorex buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick and sells it labelled as made by Memorex.
    Fred Bloggs buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick and sells it labelled as made by Memorex.

    1. The person who buys Fred Bloggs stick is being deceived, because it's not Memorex.
    2. But then so is the person who buys Memorex because it's really 'Chung Brand'.

    Item 1. is already covered by counterfeiting laws. Item 2, currently isn't covered. Nothing forces Memorex to disclose that its selling a rebadged Chung Brand product.

    1. Re:Not all trademark infringements are so serious by tpgp · · Score: 1

      You've helped me illustrate my point beautifully.

      1) Memorex buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick and sells it labelled as made by Memorex.
      2)Fred Bloggs buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick and sells it labelled as made by Memorex.


      It doesn't work like that - it works like this:

      1) Memorex buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick, performs QA on it, discards 20% due to deficiences and sells it labelled as made by Memorex (with 100% markup)

      2)Fred Bloggs buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick and sells it labelled as made by Memorex. Performs no QA on - and fails to notice this a bad batch from 'Chung' where 40% of units are faulty.

      Memorex does more then just stick their badge on something. They give the assurance that their brand is worth.

      Now what that assurance is worth, is completely dependant on what experience you've had with the company in the past, word of mouth, etc etc - but without trademark protection, all of that is worthless

      Item 1. is already covered by counterfeiting laws. Item 2, currently isn't covered. Nothing forces Memorex to disclose that its selling a rebadged Chung Brand product.

      Why should they be forced to disclosed the company they bought from? As long as its clearly labelled "Made in China"?

      --
      My pics.
    2. Re:Not all trademark infringements are so serious by topham · · Score: 1

      Worse.

      If the counterfeiting laws regarding regular merchandise are as screwed up as they are for drugs (controlled by the FDA) they could both say Memorex and be purchased from the same supplier and labeled on behalf of Memorex.

      Memorex (or any other company) could then claim the packaging is wrong (as it was inteded for a different market) and say it is counterfeit.

      Drugs are determined to be counterfeit if the packaging is not the exact same as the packaging registered with the FDA. Even if they are packaged on behalf of the same company, and with the same product. (hence, Canadian drugs are considered counterfeit, the packaging is different, often just enough to make room for a french label.)

    3. Re:Not all trademark infringements are so serious by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

      "Memorex buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick, performs QA on it, discards 20% due to deficiences and sells it labelled as made by Memorex (with 100% markup)" ..."They give the assurance that their brand is worth."

      Then why shouldn't the customer be able to honestly judge that 'added' value and decide whether it's worth paying for?:

      "Memorex, Made in China"
      If Memorex is a positive brand and bigger than the negative effect of "made in china" and it still sells, then people believe Memorex QA makes up for the poor QA in China.

      "Why should they be forced to disclosed the company they bought from? As long as its clearly labelled "Made in China"?"

      The key is in the definition of "clearly labelled". I have a computer that says "Made in Czech Republic", but is almost certainly assembled in Czech republic and made in China-> weakness in labelling of origin of major parts of assembled goods. There's other weakenesses to, and I'd like to see the origin of goods strengthened as a result.

    4. Re:Not all trademark infringements are so serious by LarsG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Memorex buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick and sells it labelled as made by Memorex.
      Fred Bloggs buys Beijing 'Chung Brand' USB stick and sells it labelled as made by Memorex.

      1. The person who buys Fred Bloggs stick is being deceived, because it's not Memorex.
      2. But then so is the person who buys Memorex because it's really 'Chung Brand'.


      From what I've been told, it doesn't work quite like that. That the sticks come from the same factory does not mean that they have the same quality.

      1) Memorex does a contract with 'Chung Mfg. Co', asking them to produce USB sticks according to certain specs (quality, price, etc). Checking that the sticks are of sufficient quality is either done by 'Chung Mfg. Co' according to the contract, or by Memorex after purchase. The important thing is - Memorex is guaranteeing the quality by putting their name on them, and know that they can't sell low grade goods without damaging the brand value.

      2) 'Chung Mfg. Co' sells surplus sticks to the general market. These might be just the same quality as those sold to Memorex, lower quality that can't be sold to Memorex or straight off the production line with no quality check (the general/grey market probably pays less than Memorex, so 'Chung Mfg. Co' is likely to cut costs somehow, perhaps by doing less testing or using lower grade raw materials). When buying one of these in the store - whether 'no-name' or mislabelled as Memorex - noone is guaranteeing the quality.

      You also have:

      3) 'Less known company' buys surplus sticks cheap from 'Chung Mfg. Co', does their own quality testing (probably less than Memorex, to keep costs down) and sell them as 'Less known brand' USB sticks.

      4) 'Well known company' does the same as (3), but instead of selling the sticks under the 'Well known brand' label, they sell them under the 'Less known subsidiary of well known company brand' label.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  46. Growing concern? by AutopsyReport · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is a growing concern? Come on, counterfeiting has been around for centuries. Louis Vuitton and the 'LV' symbol which is so sought-after these days (usually through counterfeit means) was initially introduced as a counterfeiting measure to be printed on the bags/luggage some 100 years ago or so. Now it's one of the most popular fashion symbols known, and consequently, one of the most counterfeited brands.

    It was only a matter of time before counterfeiting struck its hand on the electronics industry. There's already counterfeit electrical parts, medical supplies, you name it. The thing is about counterfeits coming from China is that there are thousands of factories that can produce the exact same product easily. Factories are next door to each other in Guangdong/Shenzen -- getting the blueprints for products is only a matter of knowing someone from another factory and getting a copy for you to produce. So it may not be so much an issue as having a counterfeit phone, but having a phone produced in a different factory.

    The truth of the matter is, the '100% mirror quality' fake Louis Vuitton's that walk their way past you in the mall are impossible to tell from the real ones. The quality is the exact same, and the materials and craftmanship the same. So for small, (mostly) meaningless electronics, counterfeit does not impose much of a problem to the consumer. For health-critical devices or medicines, it's a different story. That's why there's so much more focus on stopping counterfeit medicine than Louis Vuitton.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    1. Re:Growing concern? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0

      Your argument at the end doesn't make any sense. If something truly is a '100% mirror quality' fake, then what does it matter if it is a Louis Vuitton handbag or a GE heart monitoring machine. It is the same thing. I understand that a doctor might feel better that it is GE and not Chang's heart monitoring machine, but if it truly is the same thing, it wouldn't matter.

    2. Re:Growing concern? by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

      You are right -- if it is the exact same, then it should not make a difference (except for trademark issues). However, in the case of a counterfeit GE heart monitoring machine, no one can be held accountable if the device fails. Maybe they can't be already, but I sure wouldn't want to discover this the hard way by buying counterfeit medical devices.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  47. Re:factories in China just keep production runs go by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    you bet!

    I gladly buy fake high intensity White LED's all the time at around $0.06 each compared to the insane markup of around $).99 each in quantity here in the states. I buy packs of 1000 a couple times a year to feed my habit of modifying LEd flashlights into insane levels (I have a sharper image led floodlight that was modified from 16 led's to 50! it is now painful for people 1/2 a mile away) as well as making cash for my electronics projects by selling them at $0.25 each undercutting the local Ratshack and greedy guys at hamfests trying to get $1.99 each out of theirs. I have a simple battery testblock so friends and people at hamfests ca test them before they buy them. I usually sell out all of what I have left within 1 hour.

    Yes they are probably unuseable for someone doing a production run because I have found that 1 in about 20 is either dim or dead but for me these fakes are perfect!

    I also welcome our cheap fakes china overlords!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  48. Premium end of the market by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    "Better country of origin laws would work if everyone was willing and able to pay more for goods made in *well paying* countries"

    Price isn't everything.
    Do you pay more for a BMW than a Fiat? Fiat makes good cars sometimes, but they've also made bad ones and are devalued as a result. BMW compete at the premium end and avoid making bad cars. People do pay more and do by BMWs.

    Fiat = China
    BMW = Italy France...

    1. Re:Premium end of the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of new BMWs are American cars. I wish there was some way to tell it to those jerks who think they own the road because they finally got one.

    2. Re:Premium end of the market by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

      Bad Example:

      Fiat

      German: Fehler im allen Teilen (Fails in all parts)
      English: Fix It Again Tony

      Fiat cannot make a car with a profit. Their problem is that the line quality control is so bad that they have to fix the cars before they are shipped. then they have to sell at a discount because no one wants the cars.

  49. I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it. As long as the product funcitons as advertised, who cares?

    What's this, designer CD-ROM drives? Gucci memory sticks? Give me a break.

    Most of the parts and gear I buy is noname stuff from Taiwan. That's where the 'high class' Sony, &c. product comes from, anyway. You think these guys actually manufature all of their own products?

    1. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you could have a memory that's not rated for the amount on the label, etc..
      OR You think it's 4ghz when it's 2ghz...

  50. Deadly fakes by SysKoll · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Fake Vuitton bags don't endanger anybody's live, they are just a rip-off. Of course, since the whole "elite brand" phenomenon is largely a matter of advertizing overpriced goods, you could just dismiss the problem as a parasitic rip-off riding the coat of a legal rip-off.

    However, fakes aren't stopping at clothes and fashion. The problem is that if you don't fight counterfeit very efficiently, you soon see them appear in places where reliability and traceability are paramount. What about bad components crashing a mission-critical system? Fake brake pads in your car that overheat and fail? Or even worse, fake antibiotics and aviation parts? All these are happening today and are a major concern.

    One way to fight counterfeits is to ship items with an RFID tag that is queried at each step of the shipping and traced back to the originating factory. Of course, pirates will soon start counterfeiting tags too, so the system has to be designed to prevent fake and duplicate numbers.

    I personally must be naive because I cannot conceive making fake drugs or couterfeit airplane parts -- could you endanger thousands of lives to make a quick buck? Obviously, such scruples belong to a gentler era, such as the Hun invasions.

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:Deadly fakes by Sigma+7 · · Score: 2, Informative
      However, fakes aren't stopping at clothes and fashion. The problem is that if you don't fight counterfeit very efficiently, you soon see them appear in places where reliability and traceability are paramount. What about bad components crashing a mission-critical system? Fake brake pads in your car that overheat and fail? Or even worse, fake antibiotics and aviation parts? All these are happening today and are a major concern.?


      Mission critical systems normally procure their products directly from the manufacturer, or from a known reseller of the manufacturer - in either case, something that is known and trusted. In addition, for a new supplier, they will generally perform rigerous testing on the product.

      This procedure alone stops all but the most experienced of counterfeiters, as mission critical systems need to build up a pattern of trust beforehand.

      For regular service, counterfeiters can go in just fine by creating medium quality products. I know one government organization that got burnt by counterfeit network cards - while the cards individually met the specification, they were all cloned with identical MAC addresses.
    2. Re:Deadly fakes by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      excellent point. i laugh every time i go to bangladesh and see people wearing "nice" and "rebok" shoes. harmless really. but then i read about counterfiet similac and counterfiet powdered milk. making a competing product is fine. but hiding behind another brand lets you capitilize on that brands good name and lets them take the heat for your crappy product. it's not easy to track down who made the fake from a consumer standpoint. i'm all for 3rd party products (like toners), but faking the brand name is rarely done for good reasons.

    3. Re:Deadly fakes by SysKoll · · Score: 1
      Mission critical systems normally procure their products directly from the manufacturer, or from a known reseller of the manufacturer - in either case, something that is known and trusted. In addition, for a new supplier, they will generally perform rigerous testing on the product.

      You are correct. Qualifying a supplier is painstaking and expensive for a good reason.

      Note that back in the 80s, many large computer and electronics companies had an internal component qualifying department from which all parts had to be ordered. The qualification and purchasing depts each took their markup. And unfortunately, they didn't have much incentive to keep costs down, since they were the only game in town for their captive markets (the company). These little empires were destroyed when manufacturing was outsourced. Outsourcers saved money by having lightweight qualification processes... and so fake components started to find their way into reputable brands' products. Often, subassembly suppliers are themselves victims of counterfeits.

      Remember the bad capacitors issue? Although not strictly the same problem (bad caps are due to incorrectly formulated electrolyte thanks to klutzy industrial spies getting spotted and stealing a purposefully faulty formula), it had very much the same effect as fake parts, and reputable suppliers (MSI, ABit) got hit.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  51. does that mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can buy a pppowerbook?

    1. Re:does that mean by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      That's frikkin hilarious! And also why I never buy or sell on Ebay!

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  52. PROBLEM SOLVED: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1
    The problem with counterfit hardware can be easily fixed:

    1. Generate random numbers 12 digits long, for example.
    2. Put those numbers in a database available to the secure web site of the legitimate manufacturer, immediately after the items have been shipped to a distributor. Design a web page so that, when one of the numbers is entered in a form, the web page displays either "Good" or "Unknown, please call the manufacturer at 1-800-xxx-xxxx." List toll-free numbers for many countries.
    3. Put labels containing four of the numbers on each of the items to be protected. Hide three of the numbers below a scratch-off surface. Manufacturing company employees could not see the hidden numbers, so a dishonest employee could not reveal them to counterfeiters.
    4. Customs can then open crates and check ten of the items at random. There is virtually no chance a manufacturer of fakes would guess one of the random numbers correctly. A customs official could scratch off the paint hiding one of the numbers, leaving three still hidden.
    5. The distributor could scatch off and check the numbers of a few items.
    6. Buyers could put an item in a cart and call a friend or family member with a number shown on the outside of the box to know if an item is legitimate. After purchase, there would be a card with more numbers inside the box. Items could be returned as counterfeit if at least two numbers were not scratched off. That would allow the store where the item was returned, and the distributor, to verify the item was counterfeit.
    7. The system would discourage counterfeiting so much that few checks would be necessary.

    Another use: Put the numbers on cards inside boxes of prescription drugs, and require pharmacies to put one card in each bottle sold. In some cases, numbers could be printed on individual pills. I would never buy a drug without checking the number, would you?

    Obviously, there are variations of this plan that would be appropriate in other situations. In some cases, bar codes of random numbers, or a combination of bar codes and a list of printed numbers, would be useful.

    Customs officials would find it more efficient to have a bar code with a number and a web page URL coded in an international format on the outside of packing crates. They could wand the number and listen for a verifying beep.
    1. Re:PROBLEM SOLVED: by gedeco · · Score: 1

      Design note: modified password cracker to lift of correct numbers out of database. Use hacked computers to launch the attack.
      One correct number might be used several times.

      Or easier: Just drop into to a store and note some numbers. As long as the experiation date on some products is respected, nobody will know.

    2. Re:PROBLEM SOLVED: by fishdan · · Score: 1

      From the article: Nokia includes a holographic seal of authenticity on its batteries, along with a blacked-out area users can scratch off to reveal a serial number they can check online. Our unit had such a seal, but when we scratched off the covering to verify its number, nothing was underneath. Nokia confirmed that the battery was a counterfeit. The company also identified a second battery we purchased as counterfeit; that one's source is still under investigation

      --
      Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    3. Re:PROBLEM SOLVED: by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      Seems like a decent scheme, but I can think of a few ways to bypass it. Maybe my ways are flawed?

      1. Buy real product and obtain number
      2. Mass produce counterfeit product with genuine number
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

      -or-

      1. Obtain list of numbers from disgruntled employee
      1b. Or maybe obtain list from your cousin's boyfriend who works at the factory
      2. Mass produce counterfeit product with these numbers.
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

      In addition, you need mass end user education on how to check for a genuine product...

      What about fake websites that authenticates fake products?

  53. Some of this can certainly be attributed to by Travoltus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    IP theft happening in offshore factories placed in IP piracy-friendly nations, like China.

    That's what you get for offshore outsourcing to despotic nations. China won't even prosecute IP theft. In fact, China is involved in it. Ask Cisco about Huawei or Chevrolet about the Cherry QQ if you do not believe me.

    Offshore to a democratic, (relatively) moral nation like Germany, though, and they'll prosecute an IP thief.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Some of this can certainly be attributed to by GozerBrothers · · Score: 1

      "Offshore to a democratic, (relatively) moral nation like Germany, though, and they'll prosecute an IP thief."

      But of course there's no point to offshoring to Germany, as their labor costs are just as high as ours in the United States are. Perhaps India, with its Western traditions from its time as a British colony, is a more realistic choice that would somewhat address these political concerns?

    2. Re:Some of this can certainly be attributed to by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      "But of course there's no point to offshoring to Germany, as their labor costs are just as high as ours in the United States are. Perhaps India, with its Western traditions from its time as a British colony, is a more realistic choice that would somewhat address these political concerns?"

      India? Not hardly. Ask the pharmaceutical companies what they think about India. India has a guy there who is counterfeiting AIDS drugs.

      The problem with offshoring is that they are trying to cut corners in several ways at once:
      a) by lowering the price of labor
      b) avoiding taking responsibility for the environmental pollution they cause
      c) the fact that Asian nations do not care about their workers and have no workplace safety protections

      The downside of this is that they are getting their intellectual property stolen, which is potentially far costlier than the gains made by cheaper, unsafe workplaces with cheap workers and tons of pollution they don't have to clean up.

      The IP theft problem is potentially FATAL because you give your competition all the rope they need to hang you.

      When you offshore your production to Asia, this is what happens: soon the competition rips off your product from the factory, literally producing the same product in the same factory during off hours. This enables them to make knockoffs under your brand, and if the knockoffs do not work, they make you look bad... which will ruin your company's reputation. Then the later on, they become rich enough to make a product (based on plans they stole from you) that is EQUAL to yours, or better, that they themselves support under their own name... see: The Cherry QQ.

      The difference here between doing this in China and doing this in Germany is, Germany will prosecute you.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    3. Re:Some of this can certainly be attributed to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IP theft happening in offshore factories placed in IP piracy-friendly nations, like the United States.

      That's what you get for offshore outsourcing to despotic nations. U.S. won't even prosecute IP theft. In fact, U.S. is involved in it. Ask Nokia about Motorola or Arkwright about Slater if you do not believe me.

      Offshore to a democratic, (relatively) moral nation like Canada, though, and they'll prosecute an IP thief.

    4. Re:Some of this can certainly be attributed to by Phist · · Score: 1

      In regards to outsourcing manufacturing, the people that benefit the most from that is the company management. This is how it works...labor costs are divided up between everyone from the CEO to the new-hire. There is a line drawn between management and "unskilled" workers (or in right to fire states these are called disposable workers). The less management has to pay the disposable workers then the more management makes. One would think that the shareholders gain as well but really the share holders are at the mercy of management, especially when the biggest share holder is also the CEO. When a company is being ripped off they use that as an excuse to raise the cost of the product. Managers make money no matter how much market share the company losses. In fact, managers even make money by putting a company into bankruptcy. I would guess that factory management even goes so far as to run production off-the-record just so that they don't have to share with the rest of the company.

  54. Of course! by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    "To discover how prevalent counterfeit high-tech parts have become in the United States, PC World purchased seven hard drives, seven memory modules, and ten cell phone batteries online, using pricing search engines to find low prices."

    Well DUH. When you're shopping solely on the basis of price, you will get fleeced, because somebody is always happy to give you a really good "deal" on SHIT. Suck up the extra few $ and buy from a reputable site/store and you'll have a much better chance of getting a decent product.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  55. The Only Way to Break Into A Business by cyberscan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, fakes are the only way for a new business with limited sources of cash to break into an old product line. With all of the "parnerships" between advertisers, labor organizations, governments, and retail stores, a small company which produces a product that is also produced by the big players will have a hard time seeing their product appear on the shelves of stores like Wal-Mart and Target.

    Because people are a lot like lemmings, they will spend vast amounts of money on a pair of shoes simply because they have a checkmark (Nike) on them while disregarding a brand that is cheaper and better quality. Rather than looking at the material and construction of a product, most people buy based on what people on TV or the magazines are wearing. If one can afford to buy a blessing from Madison Avenue, they do not need to conterfeit.

    1. Re:The Only Way to Break Into A Business by dmnic · · Score: 1
      they will spend vast amounts of money on a pair of shoes simply because they have a checkmark (Nike) on them


      I wish I could find people willing to spend vast amounts of $$ on shoes with a "checkmark", but unfortunately, they want the shoes with the "swoosh" instead.
  56. U.S. Critical Vulnerability by cyberscan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where are many critical electronic parts for computers, automobiles, military weapontry, and other important devices for America manufactured? The simple answer is the "Peoples Republic" of China. How many of these devices have "trojans" or sabatage circuitry embedded in intergrated circuits themselves? We may never find out (Hopefully). I can picture the day when the world grows tired of accepting worthless paper (dollars or Federal Reserve Notes) as "payment" for tangible goods. I can also picture the day that the "People's Republic" of China decides to annex Tiawan by force. All they have to do is wait for or cause a certain condition to occur, such as a specific date, or a certain code to pass over wires, or even a specific signal to be transitted. The "trojan" circuitry picks up the signal and disables the device. A couple of lines of code or a few transistors can throw a real monky wrentch into the functionality of a device. How could the U.S. stop the invasion of Taiwan when its electronic infrastructure has been disabled? I'm sure that the U.S. government has investigated this option when it permitted American telephone equipment manufacturers to export equipment to Eastern Bloc countries before the fall of the Berlin Wall. Now, the tables are turned, and America depends on foriegn counties and companies for its electronic infrastructure.

    1. Re:U.S. Critical Vulnerability by Bassman59 · · Score: 1
      Where are many critical electronic parts for computers, automobiles, military weapontry (sic), and other important devices for America manufactured? The simple answer is the "Peoples Republic" of China.

      'scuse me, but the US military has strict rules about purchasing from US vendors who manufacture on US soil. I've seen my former employer's military customers visit not only our engineering facilities, but also our manufacturing partner.

    2. Re:U.S. Critical Vulnerability by cyberscan · · Score: 1

      This is true for classified weapons systems, but it is not true for other items used as weapons. I consider anything that is used for waging war a weapon, and that includes, computers, airplanes cars, tructs, engines, boats, ships, and anything else that the military requires to fight. Just think what would happen to the military if most of the computers within the U.S. civilian polulation ceased to work. It would not be long before the military would be unable to fight. This is what I see as the biggest "security crisis" in the U.S. today, the fact that the U.S. produces very little in terms of goods and instead, it depends on foreign countries to supply it needs. What if these countries decided to add a bit of poison to the milk?

  57. Re:factories in China just keep production runs go by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

    Where do you get them? I'm doing a project where I need about 500 white or blue LEDs. All the suppliers I found sell them like you said - for around $0.99 or more.

  58. is it really a fake Benz? by flazz · · Score: 0
    ... fake mercedes benz. They copied all contours and instead of the tri-star, it's a 5 pointed-star

    many OEM suppliers for major automotive makers are in china. most of the parts on that fake benz are probably the exact same parts on the real ones.

    the big differences? all the chinese OEM parts are shipped to germany and assembled there, oh yeah, with a 3 pointed silver arrow.

    there were many rumors in automotive journals about walmart importing these knockoff cars and selling them at sam's club.

  59. You can't see all the numbers without... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    You can't see all the numbers without scratching off the material that covers them.

    Legitimate distributors don't want fake products. A few reports would cause the distributor to suspect that a shipment was counterfeit. The distributor could identify the supplier. Remember, a few reports are all that is necessary. False positives are easy to check, by checking more numbers in the same shipment.

    Random numbers cost nothing. No number would be used more than once.

    Web pages with delayed responses stop password crackers. Anyone checking many numbers from the same internet address would cause the system to delay even more.

    There are only 31,536,000 seconds in a year. That's an extremely small proportion of a sixteen digit random number. Therefor, a one-second delay in responding to a web request prevents cracking.

  60. Probably a DEC 21140 or 21142... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Everyone used to sell those cards. Netgear sold a zillion of them. And many companies sold the same card (probably a reference design) under their own name. Apple did, for example. If you bought the 10/100 PCI add-on card for a Mac from Apple it was a 21142 ("tulip") reference card that was exactly the same as the others.

    (I don't know the difference between the 21142 and the 21140, they even used the same drivers.)

    Here's a link to a picutre of the most-common shape version of that card.

    http://fromto.cc/hosokawa/diary/2002/20020903-home /e0903230412m.jpg

    and another

    http://www.soho-jp.com/image/FE100D.jpg

    There were other versions, that had square PROM sockets instead of DIP and such, but this was by far the most common.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  61. Despotic? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    I do not think this word means what you think it means.

  62. Fake USB keydrives? by kindbud · · Score: 1
    In October 2004, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials in Anchorage, Alaska, seized 20,000 suspected fake Memorex USB memory key thumb drives from Asia.


    Doesn't this really mean that the same piece of hardware that Memorex imports with their name on it, was imported with Memorex's name on it by someone other than Memorex? I have a hard time wrapping my brain around the idea that Memorex USB key drives are somehow exclusive enough to encourage a counterfeit market. Aren't they all like five bucks, no matter who you get them from?
    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  63. Ob. Simpsons Quote by mordejai · · Score: 1

    "Pfft. I know a genuine Panaphonics when I see it. And look, there's Magnetbox and Sorny."

  64. What a bunch of FUD by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, counterfeiting is wrong, but this article is jam packed with FUD! They make it sound like only counterfeit products will fail, but we all know that the real thing can be just as bad (XBOX 360s overheating, IBM HDDs crashing, Ipod batteries dying). The worst is when they quote the MSoftie who states that if you buy a counterfeit MS product, your credit card number could be stolen. What's the basis for that?

    1. Re:What a bunch of FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you buy a real Microsoft product, and use it, your creditcard number could be stolen.
      Why wouldn't that happen when you buy a counterfeit version?

    2. Re:What a bunch of FUD by SynKKnyS · · Score: 1

      There have been a few Windows images floating around with trojans and the such preloaded.

  65. Surprise, surprise by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So some companies can produce functionally-similar goods to famous brand names for less money. Big surprise. They haven't got the overheads like private yachts for fatcat directors and shareholders. If government propaganda is to be believed they do have alternative overheads like bombs and stuff. Maybe blowing up buildings is cheaper than blowing up the tyres of a Ferrari?

    Anyway, it's almost entirely the fault of the manufacturers of the "genuine article". If people are counterfeiting your products and still managing to make a profit selling them cheaper than you, then you obviously are overpricing them in the first place.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Surprise, surprise by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Such as the inkjet cartridge division at HP? I'm sure it really costs them $50/8oz...because we're printing in gold leaf baby.

      Someone mentioned Sony earlier, who is *legendary* for slapping a shiny logo on the worst grades of tiawanese and korean junktronics. Why yes that IS a FUNAI VCR you just bought, it just happens to say Sony on the cover.

  66. Fake Memorex products? by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 0

    Maybe the fake products actually work.

    --

    Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
  67. A Trustworthy Supplier: Jimmy of "Jimmy's Trunk" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always buy my hardware from Jimmy's Trunk. He guarantees the merchandise fell off a local trustworthy truck!

  68. the first sign of a fake product ... by zen-theorist · · Score: 1
    ... is to spell GILLETTE in your own mother-tongue.

    A major Dutch retail chain recently had to recall a whole lot of Gilette Mach 3 razorblades. It turned out they were fakes. The packaging looked real enough, but the razors were nowhere near the quality Gilette makes.

  69. Counterfeit Hardware - Crypto, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am told that most of the hardware sold to third world countries for stuff like defence equipment, cryptographic equipment, high tech medicines, etc are usually fakes or duplicates from what you you would find in the western world. Does anybody have any idea of the amount of fakes being sold in the third world? I am told that 50% of all high tech equipment sold in African countries are fakes, some of them with approval from the powers that be.

  70. Re:factories in China just keep production runs go by TheDigitalOne · · Score: 1

    Can you share your source? I'd like to get a couple thousand and that is a substantial savings over the best I can find for $.59ea.

  71. Counterfit Windows by XMilkProject · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend of mine purchased a cheap laptop from your average privately owned computer store in town, and asked me to have a look at it, becuase it kept asking to activate.

    After looking at it briefly, and seeing the tell-tale sign of a badly cracked copy of Windows (Tells you to activate, but then keeps saying you've already activated) I went to the Genuine Windows checker on the Microsoft site and confirmed it was a stolen copy.

    It seems private companies selling computers with pirated microsoft software is becoming extremely common, as it allows them to easily increase their profit by many hundred dollars (if you include Office also).

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  72. counterfeit ipod by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why someone can't come out with a counterfeit ipod that works well.. I've seen ones that look like ipods, but only contain 512 megs or something.

    I'd buy a decent quality knockoff ipod if it worked like an actual ipod and had comparable features, but who wants a 512 memory stick that just looks like an ipod?

  73. Nominative use by tepples · · Score: 1

    But you raise a good point: If a fake was released that was much better than the original, would they still attack them?

    As long as the maker of "fake" merchandise comes up with its own branding and doesn't try to pass off its goods as someone else's, then there's no trademark problem. In fact, U.S. trademark law recognizes the nominative use of a competitor's mark in the context of a "compare to" or "compatible with" as a fair use of that mark, so long as it creates no confusion and implies no sponsorship or endorsement.

    1. Re:Nominative use by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      So how about when it is the same product coming out of the same factory with exactly the same quality and techincally speaking even the badge is identical, they just produced a few extra and distribute them down different marketing chain.

      In these days of contracting and off shoring, who can tell where the product comes from and what the quality will be. How much of your purchase price is now having to pay for marketing rather than the quality of the product.

      Now add to that corporate quality cycling (nut pedal pushing) where they improve quality and reliability and reduce profit margins but once their reputations for quality has allowed them to raise the profit margin, they then drop quality for a substantial increase in profit whilst claiming the same orginal now of course absent quality.

      If the fake is a good as the original, than more power to the fakes, I am sick of marketing bull shit and it's drive to the lowest common denominator (cheap crap and promises of the exact opposite), all things being equal, I would rather buy a fake and pocket the difference.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  74. MacinTosh by tepples · · Score: 1

    After all, as a consumer why would you accept that a "SuperTosh" is better than a Toshiba?

    Apple managed to take a bite out of Toshiba's market shar with its "MacinTosh" computers, split into the PowerBook and iBook lines.

  75. Dangerous fake Dell AC Adapter AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently took a look inside a fake Dell AC Adapter, whose temperature reaches 133 C! (271F). at full load..." see
    www.electricstuff.co.uk/acadapter.html
    Warning : contains scenes some engineers may find disturbing....

  76. proof that my post wasn't flame bait: by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=17338 8&cid=14426971

    See, other people are pointing out the same thing.

    Neo con moderators can't stop the truth.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  77. Re:factories in China just keep production runs go by NanoGradStudent · · Score: 1

    You can usually go to eBay and find hundreds of high-intensity LED lots (usually of 50 or 100) for sale from various sellers in Hong Kong (find someone with a low combined bid price and shipping). For Joe Hobbyist, it's usually much cheaper than ordering it from most of the component suppliers out there.

    --
    Just a little guy, y'know?
  78. ball bearing fans by loshwomp · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Back in the bad old days before you could conveniently mail order hardware, you went to the COMPUTER SHOW AND SALE at the local community college gym.

    I used to buy a lot of 80mm ball bearing fans, because the cheap-ass sleeve bearing fans that came stock in power supplies would always sieze up after 6-18 months. But often the ball bearing fans would wear out, too.

    A little surgery revealed that many of the supposed ball bearing fans actually had cheesy bushings, and the clever Chinese simply learned how to sell their cheap wares for more by slapping "ball bearing" stickers on them. Once, to make a point, I bought an $8 fan and immediately dissected it in front of the vendor with a pair of diagonal pliers. He just shrugged.

  79. Defective products with your name on it by Phist · · Score: 1

    One way of ruining the competition is by counterfeiting the competitions products and building defects into them.

  80. All those objections are easily resolved. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    All those objections are easily resolved.

    The numbers are generated inside a label making machine, and transferred securely to the web site with encryption. No humans ever see the numbers, until the covering paint is removed.

    The web site can ask for identification, the name of the store where the item was bought, and an email address.