Slashdot Mirror


Wealthy 'Cryonauts' Put Assets on Ice

Carl Bialik writes "'You can't take it with you. So Arizona resort operator David Pizer has a plan to come back and get it,' the Wall Street Journal reports. Pizer is one of about about 1,000 members of the "cryonics" movement who plan to put their bodies on ice soon after death so that in the future, medical advances can save them. A small, wealthy subset of these cryonauts is exploring ways to leave their money to themselves. 'With the help of an estate planner, Mr. Pizer has created legal arrangements for a financial trust that will manage his roughly $10 million in land and stock holdings until he is re-animated,' the Journal reports. 'Mr. Pizer says that with his money earning interest while he is frozen, he could wake up in 100 years the richest man in the world.'"

538 comments

  1. Or.... by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    he could wake up in 100 years the richest man in the world

    Or he could wake up in 300 years in sick bay with no money at all.

    1. Re:Or.... by scaryjohn · · Score: 1

      Curse you for stealing my joke!

      --
      One might ask the same about birds. What ARE birds? We just don't know.
    2. Re:Or.... by megacia · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I, for one, welcome our wealthy, frozen overlords.

    3. Re:Or.... by topical_surfactant · · Score: 1

      That episode was on G4 three nights ago. One of the worst, IMO.

    4. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could never wake up, and $10M will sit for eternity accruing interest. Sounds to me like somebody has seen one too many Futurama episodes. I bet his PIN is the same as a pizza and a coke at Panucci's Pizza.

    5. Re:Or.... by suso · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. I thought about popping it in to watch it again but then I thought about it and decided it would be a waste of 45 minutes.

      Interesting idea, but then, its a first season episode.

    6. Re:Or.... by freeasinrealale · · Score: 1

      phones his bank: how much am i worth? bank teller: $300 trillion... operator comes on line: that'll be $10 trillion for three minutes... - there are three kinds of people in world - those who are good at math and those who aren't

      --
      A man spends the first half of his life accumulating stuff, the second trying to get rid of it all.
    7. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I was thinking more along the lines of ...

      Waking up in a bath tub full of ice witha note on his chest advising him to get immedite medical help

    8. Re:Or.... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was wondering if anyone would even want to waste the time to revive him at all. The world could be too overpopulated, or they could be fed up with cryonauts. Or the economy could have shifted so much he has no current currency.

      Or he could wake up in 30 years, travel back in time, start a company to rival his first one, get frozen again, wake up 30 years later (again), marry someone who was a kid when he knew her before, and live happily ever after on the royalties from both his competing companies.

    9. Re:Or.... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...or he could wake up in 300 million years, only to discover that Cockroaches do not USE currency.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    10. Re:Or.... by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "First one to revive me gets half my fortune."

      The upside is that your remaining money must be worth something, since it was a large enough bounty to bring about your revival.

    11. Re:Or.... by bronney · · Score: 1

      I think it's just wishful thinking not on cryogenics, but on the honesty of the human spirit. And for how long does someone, some corp. has to keep this promise? And How many people are keeping it together?

      Cryo is alright, but to trust all that people with all that money? And all that technology? Come on. If I were anywhere next that technologically advanced, I'd fake his ID, transplant all his feature to me, kill him, and get his money and spend it in a month. All that people, and not a single one who'd be tempted by doing that? Or a group of people.. Oh Enron.

    12. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the money he puts into making himself a freezer pop can be reinvested in some more interesting technology. "Old money" becomes not tied up anymore. This is a "Good Thing (TM)".

    13. Re:Or.... by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

      It was a good idea, though. Also, wasn't that the first hint at the Borg, what with the mysteriously destroyed colonies in the neutral zone? Or was that something that has been retroactively made part of the Borg saga?

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    14. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or your reviver could just be a complete bastard (or otherwise not motivated my money - not everyone is, you know).

    15. Re:Or.... by Ageless · · Score: 1

      Ha! I just read that book last night :) Good one.
      (The Door Into Summer by Heinlein for those wondering)

    16. Re:Or.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      It was part of the Borg saga. The Borg were supposed to attack at the end of Season II, but TNG ran out of money. THus we had to endure the "Riker Flashback Episode" while Best of Both Worlds waited until the next season.

    17. Re:Or.... by narad · · Score: 0

      or he could still be the richest dead man.

    18. Re:Or.... by Canthros · · Score: 1

      What? You don't believe in the Twinkie-based economy?

      --
      Canthros
    19. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First one to revive me gets half my fortune."

      I would tend to suggest "First one to revive me *successfully* gets half my fortune.".

    20. Re:Or.... by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 1

      ...or your reviver could just be a complete bastard (or otherwise not motivated my money - not everyone is, you know).

      I'd guess that most people who have the resources to revive a frozen human would probably have predictable financial motives. Maybe I'm overestimating the technology involved.

      I sort of see it like the X Prize. The money is a draw, but you also have to factor in bragging rights and future franchises based on the technology. All of these motives help predict a good outcome for the human popsicle.

    21. Re:Or.... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      "money he puts into making himself a freezer pop"

      <zombie>

      Mmmmm, corpsicles...

      </zombie>

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    22. Re:Or.... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      god I love that one. It and Time Enough for Love are the top two for me. Downside* is that you have to read every single future history piece to appriciate Time Enough properly.

      * not too much of a downside though, and please don't read Time Enough if you have not read all the other works or you will surely spoil them.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    23. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No red dwarf refrence wft

      Ok it's no fun without remebering the details, and i cant find them
      something about lister leavign a light on and some money on the bank makeing him and the electric company the only 2 people in the world with money af 2 million years in stasis becauze of a dicadmium radiotion leak

    24. Re:Or.... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      All I want is to be DL'd into the Wargames computer...

      I could live forever in that and be happy.
      no body, no need to sleep?
      no sex :(
      . . .
      !
      no sex . . .
      Would you like to play a game? It's called global thermonuclear war.

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    25. Re:Or.... by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

      Or to find that all that land and physical assets were long ago destroyed...along with the rest of the Earth and a large number of other planets...to make room for the Dyson Swarm...and he's not even physically revived, but an uploaded and reconstructed mental pattern running in in a vitual environment. And the kicker? The superintelligent posthumans only revived him because they thought it'd be amusing to watch his silly antics, sort of like a simple minded pet gerbil.

    26. Re:Or.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think H.G. Wells's The Sleeper Awakes came out a BIt earlier than that Futurama episode...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    27. Re:Or.... by jibjibjib · · Score: 0

      If I found myself in that situation, I, for one, would welcome my new insect overlords.

    28. Re:Or.... by pontifier · · Score: 1

      that's the funniest thing I've read in a while... hope that doesn't happen to me :)

      --
      -John Fenley
    29. Re:Or.... by yo_tuco · · Score: 3, Funny

      "He could never wake up, and $10M will sit for eternity accruing interest"

      Nah, not too soon in the future, people will start getting e-mails that say something to the effect:


      Dear Mr Foobar

      I represent the financial estate of a Mr David Pizer. I manage approximately $10M USD of a frozen Mr Pizer and his account. I'm giving you, of all people, an exclusive opportunity to share a 70/30 cut of this large sum of wasted, frozen money. But you must act fast! 419 other people were given this same offer to become rich over night without having to do ANYTHING!

      All you have to do...

      Please, Mr. Foobar, you must maintain absolute confidentiality to ensure success...

      Sincerely,
      Mr. Scamee Nigerianez

    30. Re:Or.... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. I think that was part of the lame ass Crystalline Entity saga.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    31. Re:Or.... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      Or he could never wake up again, which sounds most plausible.

    32. Re:Or.... by Faw · · Score: 1

      ...he could wake up to realize he could buy the last can of anchovies.

    33. Re:Or.... by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a reference at the moment, if I dig one up I'll post. The destroyed outposts were supposed to be because of the Ferengi. They were supposed to be the "new Klingons," but they were so goofy that nobody could take them seriously. Fortunately, the writers corrected that and invented the Borg. If only I could remember where I read that...

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    34. Re:Or.... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or he could wake up in 300 years in sick bay with no money at all.

      Wasn't there a Niven short story on this topic? I don't have the reference handy, but a guy with some terminal disease had his body frozen, expecting that a future generation would thaw him out when a cure had been discovered.

      Thing was, he was revived thousands of years later, and while they had long since found a cure for his disease, he suddenly found himself with no money or rights. Hundreds of years before, the courts had established it was unfair to the economy (I think) to let a clinically dead person retain a bank account (which was still accumulating compound interest) and so had those accounts turned over to the State. Similarly, it was decided a dead person has no rights, as he has not participated in government.

      So this guy wakes up to discover he's being tested/trained to be a space pilot, by way of paying back his debt to society. Or something.

      Kind of puts a new perspective on things: What makes you so darn sure that future generations will want to thaw you out, and why should you expect to just pick up where you left off?

    35. Re:Or.... by Cerebus · · Score: 1

      Several Niven stories, set in his "State" universe (where Integral Trees/Smoke Ring is set). You're likely thinking about _A World Out of Time_ or the short story that it was developed from, "Rammer."

      --
      -- Cerebus
    36. Re:Or.... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Actually when he phones his bank he's got to work through the phone tree and then be put on hold by at least three reps totalling to about 31 minutes at $10 trillion a minute. So he'd be in debt $10 trillion when all was said and done. That's why money SUCKS!!! The only thing of value is knowledge.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    37. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's another Niven story with a similar-but-different take on the same story. Rich man gets frozen, and two hundred years later he's got LOTS of heirs eying his fortune, which has grown to be stupendously huge. They're the ones who get the law changed so that the frozen dead are legally dead. They used bribery (the fact that they WILL be rich) to get the ball rolling, and organ harvesting to get the public to go along with it (there were LOTS of frozen bodies, in a time period where even a traffic violation could get you hauled off to the organ banks for harvesting).

    38. Re:Or.... by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the "Life in Hell" cartoon where a guy dies, gets cryofreezed, then reanimated. His head is attached to a tractor and the future doctor says, "now you have to work off my $100 million bill."

    39. Re:Or.... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      I'll be enjoying my steak dinner tonight purchased with money, while the waiter laughs at you attempting to trade your knowledge for the same dinner at another table.

      You should have said, the only thing of value is knowledge of how to make money.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    40. Re:Or.... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Or... I'll be enjoying my homemade eggplant sandwich which cost me next to nothing to make other than the time and knowledge expended to formulate this tasty treat. While I laugh at you for actually considering a steak dinner to be any good. ;P I also think that with knowledge, you can make money. But your knowledge doesn't have to have anything to do with HOW to make money to be useful in that way. You should have said, "Knowledge that could be used to make money". This implies that your knowledge is more valuable than money because it isn't soley focused on making money. Come back to me when you're past your 20s and we'll talk again.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  2. You read it here first by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Three words for you my friends: tax evasion scam.
    Good night.

    1. Re:You read it here first by Cutriss · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like Hotblack Desiato?

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:You read it here first by Al+Mutasim · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It does seem to be a way to avoid estate taxes. However, I doubt most people are doing it for this reason. The article suggests that the "so-called dynasty trusts" are typically used to "pay out funds to a person's children, grandchildren and future generations" and do not need to have anything to do with cryogenics. You can get the tax scam without the cryo.

      These people are doing it to avoid the dread of death. I don't think it should be legal. What if everyone who died just tied up their assets this way? We would have a "Trustee Economy" (you read it here first). This would not be good. Trustees are not motivated to optimize the use of assets the way owners are.

    3. Re:You read it here first by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      actually, most of the time, they are. remember, most Trustee's earn a raw percent on the value they add to the portfolio they are managing. It just happens to be that a lot of money that used to have different risk profiles will all start tohave the same risk profile. Not good or bad, just different.

    4. Re:You read it here first by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Three words for you my friends: tax evasion scam."

      He freezes himself shortly after death to evade paying taxes...?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:You read it here first by Al+Mutasim · · Score: 1

      There can be good trustees, and it's easy to imagine ways to incentivize trustees to improve the chances of good management. But in the end, trustee motivation does not match the owner motivation. The owner of an asset gets all the benefits of good use of the asset. At best, a trustee gets a small percentage.

    6. Re:You read it here first by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this will last for a couple of years and then the loophole will close. There's no way that the government will tolerate large chunks of revenue being slucked permanently out of the economy.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    7. Re:You read it here first by Chuq · · Score: 1

      I guess if he froze himself just before death, you could say that neither of those two certainties are certain after all.

      --
      - Chuq
    8. Re:You read it here first by networkBoy · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure being frozen does, in fact, kill you.

      (yes yes, I know about the medical hypothermia, good to 3 or so hours, please don't spoil the joke too much).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:You read it here first by cduffy · · Score: 1

      The assets are still earning interest, though -- certainly, the trustees might be avoiding higher-risk inventments, but they're invested nonetheless. Investments by their nature incur a risk to receive that return -- and the (variably) risky activities activities they fund go into the regular economy. Think government bonds (which *are* used to do things, and the companies and individuals paid to do those things spend money in the regular economy), index stocks (which go into the pool of funds used to raise money for businesses via stock offerings, and to the regular economy via other approaches as well), and so forth.

      Nothing to see here, move along. Heck, more long-term investment is a good thing!

  3. Or..... by Jeff+Benjamin · · Score: 1

    Mr. Pizer says that with his money earning interest while he is frozen, he could wake up in 100 years the richest man in the world. '"

    Or, in the event that there is a market crash or the country in which his bank resides in collapses, the dumbest man in the world.

    1. Re:Or..... by Radak · · Score: 1

      Alive is alive, which he'll be and you won't be. Who's the dumb one now?

    2. Re:Or..... by jbrader · · Score: 1

      Says who? Maybe in the meantime someone will have perfected a life-extension treatment and I'll have been around making money the whole time.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    3. Re:Or..... by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would imagine that in a hundred years time or more that the normal abundant viruses and other microorganisms that are bent on destroying the human body would probably take out his immune system immediately upon reanimation or drying out or whatever you want to call it. Of course you could put him a 'bubble' or quarrantine but if you don't have an evolution of antibiotics, his system would most likely shut down upon an infection.

      The cold and flu that you and I shrug off today would kill our great grandparents (at an age of young adulthood) in an instant because of sex and diversification. Just a natural evolution process.
      Viruses evolve and his immune system won't, that's the point of having kids. Hell, the next batch of kids may be immune to this current avian flu and we ourselves may be immmune to some ancient avian flu.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    4. Re:Or..... by Takumi2501 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, look at what inflation's done over the past 20 years. Now consider what could happen over 100.

      There's really no way to predict what the economy's going to look like that far down the road.

      --
      Sent from my computer.
      Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
    5. Re:Or..... by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      "The cold and flu that you and I shrug off today would kill our great grandparents (at an age of young adulthood) in an instant because of sex and diversification. Just a natural evolution process."

      It works both ways too. A germ that was pandemic 500 years ago could deadly today.

      I was reading how they were doing research on the world flu of the early 1900s by recovering bodies that were buried in permafrost. They had to take special precautions that they didn't start another epidemic of the world flu, because few people have immunity to it these days.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    6. Re:Or..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once he's dead, he won't HAVE any assets. The state or the federal govt will just pass a law making all assets of dead people that are not left to living people revert to the state. Hell, such a law may exist already.

    7. Re:Or..... by Servants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cold and flu that you and I shrug off today would kill our great grandparents (at an age of young adulthood) in an instant because of sex and diversification.

      That's completely not true. You don't think that people's immune systems in any given generation just luckily happen to be attuned to exactly the germs which will be around during their lifetimes? The immune system is extremely adaptable and will effectively attack nearly any foreign menace. We don't have to rely on it evolving to match specific germs that go through a million times as many evolutionary generations as we do.

      (As a side note, it's typically not advantageous for infectious agents to evolve to kill their hosts anyway, except under crowded and unsanitary conditions where they can spread very quickly. Many germs could well evolve to be less deadly as world sanitation improves.)

      You're probably thinking of the (extremely plausible) argument that the main evolutionary purpose of sex is to "change the locks" against such parasites. But the point of this is more that a genetically uniform population would be vulnerable, so lineages that could vary their genetic makeup would gain an advantage; not that genetic change is the primary line of defense against parasites. Luckily for all of us, it isn't.

    8. Re:Or..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The cold and flu that you and I shrug off today would kill our great grandparents (at an age of young adulthood) in an instant because of sex and diversification. Just a natural evolution process.
      Viruses evolve and his immune system won't, that's the point of having kids. Hell, the next batch of kids may be immune to this current avian flu and we ourselves may be immmune to some ancient avian flu.


      Good grief, people will believe anything these days.

    9. Re:Or..... by xiphoris · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes! Mod parent up!

      IANAD, but I am a med student. People are always worried about "viruses from space" coming to destroy us because our immune systems "won't be able to handle it". This is a crock of bullshit. Our immune systems are extremely effective at handling any foreign substances. The dangerous ones are those that have specifically evolved to trick our immune systems. The body (through an extremely complex & inefficient process) can generate antibodies to practically any pathogen.

      Though, the grandparent may have a point that diseases of the future may have evolved (like HIV family viruses have) to trick our immune systems. Observe, however, that the most effective parasites do not kill their hosts. All the viruses that kill us are viruses *we* wipe out. There are thousands of bacteria living in our stomachs and viruses elsewhere in our bodies with which we have established harmony (most of the time).

    10. Re:Or..... by MSZ · · Score: 1

      Oh he won't be.

      Trouble is, currently freezing is available only after confirmed death. When the brain, with the memories and the personality settings is destroyed pretty much completely. It only takes 4-5 minutes without oxygen supply to die completely and lose the data.

      So, they're freezing cadavers. And after unfreezing, these will remain cadavers, because you can't make rotten brain whole again...

      Revival would be at least possible (maybe even successful) if, and only if, the subjects were frozen while still alive. Problem with that is, that the freezing procedure makes them dead (at least technically), so anyone trying to do the cryonics the right way would be charged with murder by liquid nitrogen :-)

      Turns out the only way is to "accidentally" fall into the tank at Alcor ;-) Then you'll have a chance.

      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
    11. Re:Or..... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      IANAD, but I am a med student. People are always worried about "viruses from space" coming to destroy us because our immune systems "won't be able to handle it". This is a crock of bullshit. Our immune systems are extremely effective at handling any foreign substances. The dangerous ones are those that have specifically evolved to trick our immune systems. The body (through an extremely complex & inefficient process) can generate antibodies to practically any pathogen.

      This fear might have something to do with how european diseases wiped out American Indian populations after Columbus's expedition. Of course those were diseases that were already familiar with human bodies, which a space bug would likely not be...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  4. What will actually happen is..... by EGSonikku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Duh, he'll just wake up in a few hundred years after his consciousness is transferred into the memrouy wiped body of a convict, and recieve RNA memory injections and learn to pilot interstellar world seeding ships.

    --
    - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    1. Re:What will actually happen is..... by Gertlex · · Score: 1

      Exactly... except I can't remember if that was Asimov or Niven that wrote that (or another that I forgot...)

    2. Re:What will actually happen is..... by tachyonflow · · Score: 1
      Duh, he'll just wake up in a few hundred years after his consciousness is transferred into the memrouy wiped body of a convict, and recieve RNA memory injections and learn to pilot interstellar world seeding ships.
      Yeah, it's all fun and games until you wake up to a facist society that is fed up with corpsicle slackers. In other news, I hear that theft of interstellar world seeding ships is at an all time high...
    3. Re:What will actually happen is..... by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      Nivens World out of Time

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    4. Re:What will actually happen is..... by mellon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, next thing you're going to tell is is that he's going to be bit on the toe by a cat that's a snake. That's highly unlikely. More likely his organs will be harvested and his assets taken by the state. If he's lucky they'll keep his brain frozen, but that's unlikely - it'll be considered a waste of resources.

    5. Re:What will actually happen is..... by kakashiryo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wait. What? THIS IS MODDED INTERESTING?

      I can't beleive people actually thought this is possib....

      Oh yeah. This is Slashdot.

    6. Re:What will actually happen is..... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      I read one of the reviews for this book on Amazon.com and it confirmed what I had thought
      A World Out of Time is written almost like a string of short stories clumped together. It appears that Niven took the short story 'Rammer' and tried to make a novel length work out of it. The result is not very pleasing.
      I've got "A Hole In Space" right in front of me. It's a collection of short stories & Rammer is the first one.

      I didn't even know that Niven had turned it into a full fledged book.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:What will actually happen is..... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      so you're not so new here then? :-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    8. Re:What will actually happen is..... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I didn't even know that Niven had turned it into a full fledged book.

      "World Out of Time" is quite entertaining, not least because it doesn't carry the baggage of Knowm Space. Notably, there is no FTL or aliens (though there is teleportation), but there is some fairly breath-taking astro-engineering in the second part set a million (?) or so years after the first part ("Rammer"). Note that this may be the same history as the "Smoke Ring" novels.

    9. Re:What will actually happen is..... by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that in the Book of Mormon?

    10. Re:What will actually happen is..... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Just to repeat what a mod-0 comment says:

      It's "World out of Time" by Larry Niven. Also there was a short story called "Rammer" which is the first chapter of the book.

  5. Old joke... by SiliconEntity · · Score: 5, Funny

    David Pizer wakes up in the future and calls his accountant to find out how his account is doing. "Good news!" the man says. "Your ten million dollars has grown to almost one billion dollars!" David is ecstatic and they talk a minute more. Suddenly the phone chimes. "Please deposit one hundred million dollars for the next three minutes..."

    1. Re:Old joke... by wanax · · Score: 1

      The amusing thing about this is that for much of medieval history, many people did try to leave perpetuities for them and their families, not for anything in life, but to ensure that there were enough monks/masses for them to ensure their eternal salvation.. Same thing happened in the Ottomon empire... check out Barbara Tuchman's "A Distant Mirror" or Halil Inalcik's "The Ottoman Empire 1300-1600" as far as one can tell, the half life of any of these was ~100 years, with a max of about 300 before they were taken over... and if you look, please do so in order, since Barbara Tuchman is a much much better writer :)

    2. Re:Old joke... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Or he wakes up and found that his stock tanked (or indeed has the $100M phone call) and dies again from shock. In either case, he has no money and dies properly (though maybe a bit cold) the second time around.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Old joke... by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      with a max of about 300 before they were taken over

      Some institutions have managed to last substantially longer. For instance, many of the older colleges at the universities of Oxford and Cambridge were originally founded to pray for their founders, and still say a prayer for them every night before dinner, as much as 800 years later. If you're not picky about the prayer bit, there are institutions and cities (e.g. Alexandria) carrying their founder's name thousands of years later.

  6. Before any says... by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before anyone says that this guy is greedy and should give the money to charity, I'd like to point out that there's little chance that he will come back to life unthawed, and if he doesn't spend the money it makes us all just a tiny bit richer.

    1. Re:Before any says... by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 1

      You mean the banks richer, right? (or possibly the state his is a resident of, his lawyers, or possible a distant relative who hires an attorney to argue that this guy will *always* be a popsicle).

    2. Re:Before any says... by datacaliber · · Score: 1

      Great. I'm looking forward to the check in the mail.

    3. Re:Before any says... by c_forq · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The banks yes, but also everyone that uses the same currency as him. Taking that much money out of circulation should help increase the value of the bills in your wallet right now.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    4. Re:Before any says... by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Well, if I was him, I would have it keep earning interest indefinitely as long as he was still alive and if he died, in an accident or something, the money keep earning interest, but have much of it spent on statues of him. I'd have the statues continue to be built indefinitely, perhaps moving to the moon and Mars when space runs out on Earth.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    5. Re:Before any says... by fiendy · · Score: 1

      Of course he's greedy, he's figured out a way to consume electricity even after he's dead. Regardless that he's paying for it, he's found a way to consume in excess.

    6. Re:Before any says... by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The banks yes, but also everyone that uses the same currency as him. Taking that much money out of circulation should help increase the value of the bills in your wallet right now.

      Bingo! I had a friend once who saw the movie Dead Presidents and he could not understand that printing money and giving it away would be a bad thing. On a side note, I was shocked recently when I found out that the US government or Alan Greenspan or whatever does this very thing.

    7. Re:Before any says... by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      Sometimes they do that, sometimes they sell their store of bonds on the free market to lock up money. It's a balancing act.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    8. Re:Before any says... by chromatic · · Score: 1
      Taking that much money out of circulation...

      How does investing it take it out of circulation?

    9. Re:Before any says... by GigsVT · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If he spent that money, the companies and people he bought products from would be richer (as would all their suppliers), and he would get a product that he enjoyed more than the idea of having that much money in the bank. Win-win.

      The economy doesn't work if no one spends money.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    10. Re:Before any says... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Really depends on how it is invested. If it just sits in a bank (or many banks) then it isn't being circulated.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    11. Re:Before any says... by Bongo+Bill · · Score: 1

      Because nobody's spending it. If it's been put into a mutual fund, it's staying in that mutual fund. It's not being spent on anything. Hence, no circulation.

      --
      ...but is it art?
    12. Re:Before any says... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The banks yes, but also everyone that uses the same currency as him. Taking that much money out of circulation should help increase the value of the bills in your wallet right now.

      Pfff! 10 million is infinitessimal in relation to even the minted and coined (M0) money supply (AKA "cash"), which is itself already fairly small in comparison to the full (M3) money supply as a whole. On top of that the value of the money supply is additionally at the mercy of a myriad of external forces. In the larger scheme of things, this guy's "fortune" is actually as meaningless as his plans to keep it forever.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    13. Re:Before any says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think the bank does with it?

    14. Re:Before any says... by mcbiondi · · Score: 1
      Huh? It doesn't work that way.

      The first job of any bank / fund is to provide liquidity to the economy in the form of funding. Where exactly do you think that funding comes from?

    15. Re:Before any says... by carlislematthew · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, banks will lend the money to others, or buy stocks, or whatever. They don't just put it under the matress and pay out interest out of their own pocket. The bank re-invests and gives you a share of the profits (sometimes, anyway).

    16. Re:Before any says... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Currency in a safe deposit box wouldn't be circulated, but your checking/savings account at a bank do not fuction in that way. Rather the bank loans out the money nearly instantly (they keep a small percentage of their accounts on hand for daily withdrawls). A pretty good explination of this exists in, "It's a Wonderful Life" during the depression bank run scene. The money is all reused typically quite quickly (a matter of seconds rather than hours or days).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    17. Re:Before any says... by darjen · · Score: 1
      if he doesn't spend the money it makes us all just a tiny bit richer.

      It's more like, if he doesn't spend the money it's that much more the Feds can print without hyperinflating the dollar. Of course, the dollar will probably end in hyperflation anyway, and the chances of the dollar surviving another hundred years are probably almost as slim as this guy surviving.

    18. Re:Before any says... by mfrank · · Score: 1

      You know, there are some people that actually value having money invested instead of buying something shiny. They're called "grownups". Don't worry, though, there are plenty of people that aren't grownups in America. I mean, someone has to buy the shiny things made by the companies owned by the grownups.

    19. Re:Before any says... by mfrank · · Score: 1

      You could make the same argument about anyone that has children.

  7. STTNG by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reminds me of the Star Trek Next Generation episode where they wake up people who were frozen. The doc cured them, and one guy wanted to check on his stocks. They thought he was nuts, because why would you need stocks when you could just ask the replicator for anything you wanted?

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:STTNG by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Replicators can make Orian sex slaves? Sweet!

    2. Re:STTNG by kosmicki · · Score: 1

      That's what holosuites are for ya idiot. ;) If that was me, I do believe I would have locked myself in one if they did not have parental controls. "What do you mean a Starfleet Holosuite can't do that?! "

      Although that might explain why they always seemed to do such boring stuff in them on the show... On the other hand, if you just saved an entire planet, maybe you do just want to mountain climb for a bit...

    3. Re:STTNG by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortuneatly for our "real" situation makers of everything from candy bars to bath soap would cry foul if replicators were ever invented. "Pirates" would be trading templates for items all over the place, but the technology would be villified beyond belief.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    4. Re:STTNG by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't matter. Pirates wouldn't have a revenue source because regular people would be buying them all, making everyone both a pirate and a consumer ;D After all, you only need one. Then the replicator can replicate itself. You can only sell them until someone decides to give them away, or sell for cheaper, at which point a drastic "race to the bottom" occurs, netting everyone a replicator.

    5. Re:STTNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the society in startrek is very socialist/communist ideals oriented....for the common good...so that wouldn't be a worry..

    6. Re:STTNG by Stuupid · · Score: 1

      When we create machines that can create stuff from raw atoms they will probably require large power sources and strange chemicals to operate. I would think that manufacturing would simply replace their current production with a replicator system if it was cheaper to do so.

      as for small personal replicators the cost for items would shift from retail to the cost of materials and the "template". Templates being software, they would be protected and pirated as they are today-- so the lesson here is that when personal replicators are invented, invest in the materials. profit!

    7. Re:STTNG by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Items? ITEMS?!

      Ok, I'm guilty. No doubt I would be looking for Ferrari templates for my own driving pleasure. But, god forbid some wackjob starts looking for "80_megaton_h-bomb.torrent"

      The future will be interesting indeed.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:STTNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's deemed "anti-competitive", and offenders are shot.

      Unless the original makers only sell versions that recognize plans for replicators and don't produce them (and keep replicators that make replicators for themselves). (This might lead to the DRM-hacking races we have today - who can make a replicator that slips past the DRM?)

    9. Re:STTNG by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of the Star Trek Next Generation episode where they wake up people who were frozen. The doc cured them, and one guy wanted to check on his stocks. They thought he was nuts, because why would you need stocks when you could just ask the replicator for anything you wanted?

      Which makes nonsense of the entire social structure presented. Why are so many people working at mundane jobs in the ST future? Why take shit from a boss when you don't need the money? I can believe some would be drawn to adventurous or service-oriented jobs, like Starfleet, but all the cooks and bottlewashers you see on every planetary visit? One can retcon excuses why the society seems basically unchanged in having a large number of proles, but it's obviously somethng that was never thought through.

    10. Re:STTNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. We already have replicators for a significant percentage of what we use. De we have free stuff?

    11. Re:STTNG by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      The Enterprise would be a very insular environment and probaby wouldn't be representative of life in the federation. Starfleet vessels are on the front lines of the scientific, diplomatic, and military frontiers in the galaxy, so it makes sense that they would be given vast resources by the federation to carry out their mission. For example, transporting takes a great deal of energy to accomplish, which is why the transporter room is used whenever possible, since a "site to site" transport is basically two different transport cycles. Now the Enterprise uses the transporter all the time, because it's to their advantage to be able to quickly and efficiently move people around. There hasn't really been an instance where they say "We've used the transporter too much, let's use a shuttle" or anything to that effect. Compare this to earth citizens. In DS9, Sisko once talked about his academy days when he was feeling homesick, and thus during his first week, transported from the academy to his home every night for dinner. He commented on how he "must have used a month's worth of transporter credits in a week" to do that. From this, we can assume that people not on official starfleet or federation business have limits on how much technology they can use.

      Consider it a different way. Imagine you were an alien and you were studying human culture based on what you observed on an aircraft carrier. You might make such conclusions like "Everyone gets free health care" or "Airplanes are the main vehicle of transport that humans use for daily travel" or "These people don't need money as their society provides all the basics for daily life". We've seen a very narrow, very unique part of the federation through Star Trek. We don't know much about Federation life. We don't even know much about starships that aren't the flagship of the fleet. We've seen that there are fairly unactractive postings in the federation, like in one episode where two officers were stationed for months at a time on a subspace relay station. The Enterprise is for the most part the Ivory Tower of the federation; they're into some pretty important stuff, but for the most part they're removed from the daily grind of normal stuff.

    12. Re:STTNG by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      ... which is precisely why Firefly was such an endearing TV series; the crew had to struggle for their basic needs, rather than having everything handed to them on a silver platter. If it had been part of Star Trek cannon, it might even have made it more than one season.

      It was certainly better than Enterprise. :)

    13. Re:STTNG by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Why do you need money when you have a replicator? Well, why don't you ask a Ferengi?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:STTNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us do.

    15. Re:STTNG by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The Enterprise would be a very insular environment and probaby wouldn't be representative of life in the federation

      Which is why I was talking about what we see on shore leave and other planetary visits; commercial shipping, etc.

      Once you have matter/antimatter power, fusion, transporters, replicators (these must be dirt cheap if Picard uses them to make cups of tea rather than boiling a cup in the old-fashioend way), there is no reason for drudgery.

    16. Re:STTNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's deemed "anti-competitive", and offenders are shot.
      and then the pirates start handing round templates for whatever is the nastiest anti-personell weapon they can find!

      seriously i doubt unrestricted replicators would ever be allowed, the milatary would see to it that they weren't as with them anyone would become a major danger to society.

      petermgreen posting AC because i can't get at the mail account with my slashdot password mail in it atm.

    17. Re:STTNG by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      Very insightful. Hadn't thought of that, but you're totally right. We won't be purchasing soap, pants or coffee: We'll be buying a license.

    18. Re:STTNG by skryche · · Score: 1
      Unfortuneatly for our "real" situation makers of everything from candy bars to bath soap would cry foul if replicators were ever invented. "Pirates" would be trading templates for items all over the place, but the technology would be villified beyond belief.

      Yeah, until hobbyists start creating and distributing item template torrents under a Creative Commons license.

    19. Re:STTNG by sjames · · Score: 1

      In some form, that's exactly why capitalism as an economic system cannot effectively reach our goals for humanity. It turns the greatest human triumph, the complete automation of all drudge work, into a dystopia where people starve when they cannot afford the fruits of that work. It's the old question from the Roman Empire when the steam engine was proposed: "But what will the slaves do?"

    20. Re:STTNG by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The food replicators actually make sense, even if they are more energy intensive than cooking your own food. The replicators mean you don't have to keep large food stores on the ship which can rot. I don't know for certain what the stock material for the food replication is, but I'd imagine it's easily stored in small areas, and with the same material can be used to make steaks or self-sealing-stembolts, so it's very utilitarian. You also get a large variety of meals that can be prepared, which can help keep morale up on long missions, compared to how the crew would feel about having their selection of 6 flavors of rehyrdated gruel 3 times a day. There's also the part of not needing kitchen facilities or cooking personel on the ship. We've all seen how the Enterprise is a ship full of officers and no enlisted personel. Consider that most of the menial tasks on the Enterprise are automated; cooking, cleaning (The enterprise has been called a "self cleaning ship" in a few episodes), probably other things like laundry and stuff too. I'm don't have any experience with naval operations, but I think that modern ships have mainly enlisted men doing all the drugdery necessary for ship operations like cooking cleaning, and the like. With the enterprise having those things automated, they need fewer enlisted and thus have room for more officers for things like the dozen or so science departments on the enterprise.

    21. Re:STTNG by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Fortunately for we the consumers though, 3D printers and model fabricators are making a lot of progress. We can now print circuits and multiple materials...I am confident some time this century we will face the very real situation of being able to swap "templates" online and print it up at home. Maybe not a Mercedes, but maybe small electronic devices.

      Of course, you still need to feed it the necessary amount of raw materials.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    22. Re:STTNG by vdo2000 · · Score: 1
      You could recycle waste products...

      In one part of the ship, somebody orders the replicator to make a steak.

      In another part of the ship, someone flushes a toilet...

    23. Re:STTNG by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      There was a lecture years ago (back in the 80's) about how fusion/replication would not only change the economy but our entire society at large.

      Not only would electricity be free, but so would our food sources. No one would have to grow food en mass because it could be replicated. Food would be free too.

      It was a fascinating concept and worth checking out:

      It was called the Fusion Torch and Ripe Tomatoes by Paul Hewitt
      http://www.conceptualphysics.com/index.html

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    24. Re:STTNG by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      "But what will the slaves do?"

      Automation of repetitious manual tasks (factory work) resulted in people working more with their brains (office work). Now that "thinking work" is being displaced by software, what's left for humans to productively do?

    25. Re:STTNG by sjames · · Score: 1

      Automation of repetitious manual tasks (factory work) resulted in people working more with their brains (office work). Now that "thinking work" is being displaced by software, what's left for humans to productively do?

      In fact, there's still plenty of mindless manual labor being done by poorly paid humans because they're cheaper than the machine.

      .

      I must take issue with the statement that thinking jobs are being replaced with software. More like mindless paper pushing is being replaced by software. Further, much of that mindless paper pushing isn't particularly useful.

      There's plenty of things for people to do that software is currently nowhere near replacing. REAL creative thinking, the arts, science, etc.

      If there's not enough work in that to keep everyone busy, GOOD! THAT is the goal! So long as we don't cling to the idea that people whose labor isn't needed should starve to death and their family with them (or live on the trash heap), we can all cut back on work and start being creative.

    26. Re:STTNG by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      So, the IT revolution will result in everyone kicking back and thinking for a living? Maybe in 200 years?

      I must take issue with the statement that thinking jobs are being replaced with software.

      I guess that depends on which jobs. In engineering (not software "engineering"), a lot of people are relying on sophisticated programs rather than knowledge. These programs only output correct answers if they are asked the correct questions.

      But sophisticated programs run by relatively cheap and inexperienced engineers is often preferable to management than experienced, expensive engineers.

    27. Re:STTNG by sjames · · Score: 1

      So, the IT revolution will result in everyone kicking back and thinking for a living? Maybe in 200 years?

      I would consider that to be an appropriate goal. It would seem to be the way many would like to see things go. I doubt very much that it'll take 200 years, but I don't expect to see it in the next 10-20 either. However, it's not all or nothing. Can you suggest a better goal?

      I guess that depends on which jobs. In engineering (not software "engineering"), a lot of people are relying on sophisticated programs rather than knowledge. These programs only output correct answers if they are asked the correct questions.

      Those hardly replace engineers. Someone has to know an incorrect question or answer when he hears one. I can assure you those programs do not posess intelligence or creativity in any amount.

      That sort of tool replaces engineers the same way case tools and a million other snake oil solutions were supposed to replace programmers by directly translating requirements into code. Turns out that without programmers, business people CAN'T write sufficient requirements for it to work.

      Management always will prefer their employees cheap and inexperianced enough to follow orders blindly. That is, until the time comes when someone with seniority has to sign his name and take responsability for human safety. That's when they want the experianced PE to take over.

  8. Comical ethics of advance technology... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a horror comic in the early 80's that has a story that I still remember.

    A rich man who was dying had enough money to develop the technology to put himself on ice until medical technology was advance enough to cure his disease. He wakes up about 50 years later to find out that medical technology did indeed advance greatly over the years. But there was no cure for his disease. Instead, he was revived so the doctors could harvest his limbs for the veterans of the last World War who lost their arms and legs. Since he was beyond cure, the doctors figured his limbs were still useful to humanity. Advance technology rendered the rich man a basketcase.

    1. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by RickPartin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks for spoiling an obscure movie from the 80's that I've never of and will never watch. Jerk.

    2. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Great. That's like the one I read when I was a kid (some 30 years ago) in which a rich old dude decided he could cheat death by replacing parts as they wore out. The doctors replaced blood, organs, finally putting his brain into a humanoid machine. Then they replaced his brain with a computer, and threw the brain away.

      Did he live forever by this process? You tell me.

    3. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      There's also a science fiction short story dealing with this subject matter - I don't recall all the details, really, or even who wrote it or what the title was, but it involved one guy who had been frozen for some reason and was later on thawed again. The story chronicled how he struggled to fit into the new world - one he wasn't born into, wasn't familiar with, and ultimately couldn't fit into.

      One thing I do remember and that might help to identify the story was that he was sentenced to death at some point for something he did; he was executed, too, but later on woke up again, and was told that even though he had died, he had been resurrected as well - apparently, this was the norm in that society when a death penalty was carried out. He hadn't known about this before, though, and had freaked (of course).

      I don't remember how the story ended (it's really been a while), but I think the author had a point: would you even *want* to wake up a few hundred years into the future? Suppose that someone from the Renaissance had been frozen and would be thawed today - do you think they'd fit in? The technological changes would already be overwhelming, but the cultural changes are probably an even bigger problem. You might learn to adapt, but ultimately, you couldn't be happy, and even if you really *were* the richest man in the world, all that you could do with your riches would be to try recreate the world you lived in and which doesn't exist anymore.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

      The alternative to an existence you *may* not be happy with is certain non-existence. If I thought there were a way to store my terminally ill body in suspended animation, I'd take my chances. If you decide you made the wrong choice when you wake up in some unintelligble future world, you could always commit suicide.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    5. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Don't be so sure you'd have the courage to do that.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    6. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah I'd want to. I don't fit in now. A few hundred years into the future I might be the fucking Fonz!

    7. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Roger Zelazny, The Graveyard Heart

    8. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      Oh, he didn't mention the most shocking part of the move. Those limbs? THEY'RE MADE FROM PEOPLE!!!

    9. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I might be the fucking Fonz!

      Have you seen him lately? He's jumped the shark since he jumped the shark.

    10. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Well, ARM or CORE?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      yeah, these guys could inspire a dozen twilight zone episodes.

    12. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replacing the "of" with "have" would not have made the post any more sensible.

      It would make much more sense if the word "heard" would be added before the "of".

    13. Re:Comical ethics of advance technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha!

      damn i loved that game. that was the primera uno example of a high-bodycount, high intensity attack-based game... i loved the fact you could do/have to worry about shit like a big bertha deep in the enemy base that could just pound practically anywhere on the map...

  9. Rule against perpetuities by Peyna · · Score: 5, Informative

    The rule against perpetuities should probably stop this in most states. The point of it is to keep property from being tied up and being useless for long periods of time. I think it's probably a moot point until they actually manage to unthaw someone and then keep them alive for more than a second or two.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Rule against perpetuities by Elminst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rule against perpetuities??

      Then how do you explain the f'ed up Copyright system??

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    2. Re:Rule against perpetuities by coscarart · · Score: 1

      The rule against perpituities only applies to future interests in land, not to trusts. Do you have any idea what you are talking about?

    3. Re:Rule against perpetuities by CmdrPorno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you have any idea what you are talking about? The rule against perpetuities applies to future interests in any property--land, objects, or money. Upon your death, you can not set up a trust to devise all of your estate to your descendants 200 years down the line, none of whom have been born yet.

      link

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    4. Re:Rule against perpetuities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's kind of the point, while that money is stuffed in under your matress it isn't earning any interest

    5. Re:Rule against perpetuities by agibbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The rule against perpetuities, in most states, has an exemption for reversions to the original grantor. Furthermore, the original grantor fills in all the gaps created by grants that violate the rule against perpetuities. This means that it would present no bar to a person's estate retaining money even hundreds of years in the future. That said it would likely raise some very interesting legal issues.

      Furthermore, many states have recently effectively eviserated the old common law rule against perpetuities so, while it is an interesting and mind bending exercise for first-year law students, there is little real applicability of it today (or so my Property professor told me...)

    6. Re:Rule against perpetuities by ThreeE · · Score: 0, Insightful

      RTFA -- he's earning a return, therefore it's not stuffed under a mattress. The money is either invested in a company, or is earning interest in a bank -- and therefore is being used.

      But all this is meaningless -- if I have $10M I can use it to stuff my pants if I want to. It's my money. I don't have to "use" any of my assets if I don't want to.

    7. Re:Rule against perpetuities by rpenner · · Score: 1

      Unthaw.

      Unmod the unchild.

    8. Re:Rule against perpetuities by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      There are some states in the US that have completely removed the rule against perpetuities. So that wont be a problem.

      The problem will be even more basic -- there is no legal way to create a future interest in someone that is currently dead. So the only way these people can keep their money is to use a intermediary and the intermediary will most likely just keep the money for him/her self in the unlikely chance that the surviving family does take it trough legal action.

    9. Re:Rule against perpetuities by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      yeah but any interests in the original grantor goes to his/her heirs once the grantor dies. If the grantor somehow comes back to life he will not have any rights.

    10. Re:Rule against perpetuities by Botty · · Score: 0

      Unthaw.

      Unmod the unchild.

      Undown? Double plus not ungood!

    11. Re:Rule against perpetuities by damsa · · Score: 1

      Many jurisdictions have gotten rid of RAP as it applies to trusts by statute. So you are both kinda right.

    12. Re:Rule against perpetuities by agibbs · · Score: 1

      But then the question the law will have to address if that ever happens is: was he really dead?

  10. Doubtful legality by Raindance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd suspect that the legal status of someone that's, well, legally dead would be rather iffy. And for good reason- why should we set aside economic power for inactive (and potentially never-to-be active) members of our society? I think the burden of proof that this should be possible lies on them.

    There's also things such as Adverse Possession that could throw a wrench into things. I'd recommend that any 'cryonauts' conceive of any post-death, pre-revival arrangements to be tentative at best.

    1. Re:Doubtful legality by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'd suspect that the legal status of someone that's, well, legally dead would be rather iffy.
      I'm reminded of the Pharoahs of Egypt, who wanted so badly to "take it with them" that they were buried with great riches and even their own (living) servants. Fast forward a few thousand years to the explorers/theives who plundered the remains. There nobody around to protect whatever ownership rights the mummies thought they had over their loot.

      All I can say is, let it go. You don't own anything in perpetuity, not even the water and dirt your body is made of.

    2. Re:Doubtful legality by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Fast forward a few thousand years to the explorers/theives who plundered the remains.

      Most of them weren't that lucky. Many of the tombs were plundered within generations of their being sealed (most likely by the people/families that built and knew the secrets of the tombs.) There's a few tombs in the VOTK that are populated with nearly a hundred mummies iirc,.. the priests were forced into moving the mummies into concentrated spots so they were better able to protect them from the plunderers. This is really off-topic :D

    3. Re:Doubtful legality by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      It's not like he's putting that money in a money market fund (that's a travesty of a whole 'nother sort that ought to be a crime against humanity, whether you're alive or dead!); presumably the money is being invested on his behalf by someone in charge of his estate. In such a manner this money still serves to lower interest rates, create wealth etc as it would if his already well to do child inherited it. The big question is if and when government gets a cut, and if his children can successfully sue to invalidate the will or whatever have you that directs his estate. I don't see it working, if only because unthawing someone frozen incorrectly successfully is probably harder than curing whatever disease ailed them.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    4. Re:Doubtful legality by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      "I'd suspect that the legal status of someone that's, well, legally dead would be rather iffy" us zombies have rights too, you insensative clod!

    5. Re:Doubtful legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm reminded of the Pharoahs of Egypt, who wanted so badly to "take it with them" that they were buried with great riches and even their own (living) servants. Fast forward a few thousand years to the explorers/theives who plundered the remains. There nobody around to protect whatever ownership rights the mummies thought they had over their loot.


      Oh no? What about the mummie's curse?

    6. Re:Doubtful legality by justins · · Score: 1
      And for good reason- why should we set aside economic power for inactive (and potentially never-to-be active) members of our society? I think the burden of proof that this should be possible lies on them.

      "Society" can tax these death trusts to the point where, adjusted for inflation, they don't grow very quickly. It seems like a good way to appease the whiners. Heaven forbid somebody improve their financial situation just by dying.

      Or the government can just seize them. It is hard to see how that could be considered moral or correct.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    7. Re:Doubtful legality by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      a money market fund ... a travesty of a whole 'nother sort that ought to be a crime against humanity

      Why?

    8. Re:Doubtful legality by kevin.fowler · · Score: 1

      In the long run, not even the atoms.

      cue oooooooooooEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOoooooooo music

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
  11. re-animation *after* death? by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    Since he would have recently died before being frozen, he can wake up in 100 years and be the crappiest-feeling richest guy on earth! They say money can't buy everything.

  12. The only real winners are the lawyers by Belseth · · Score: 1

    Hope he hasn't got any greedy family members. The lawyers will end up with it all when the jackals decend.

    1. Re:The only real winners are the lawyers by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Sounds good to me.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  13. Family members by RedWizzard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This scheme was mentioned in at least one of Niven's books. It didn't work - surviving family members took the estate to court to get at their rightful inheritance. I think that's a pretty likely outcome. Another likely outcome is that the estate management will embezzle it (it's not like you can watch them closely when you're dead). It's also possible the government might decide to seize it, if it's a tempting enough target.

    1. Re:Family members by pmancini · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The estate could claim that his state of inanimation does not constitute death and that the freezing process is part of a long medical procedure.

      Of course his greedier heirs would then have themselves frozen with orders to be revived when he wakes or is declared dead!

    2. Re:Family members by mre5565 · · Score: 1

      One way to combat this scenario is to have a will that promises some
      inheritence if the survivors don't contest, and nothing at all if they
      do.

    3. Re:Family members by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Choose your spouse carefully, and raise your children even more carefully.

      At a cryofeast in my area, I met an entire family who had Alcor contracts. Mom, dad, and three adorable little kids. So I'm definitely not going to marry anybody who isn't at least as cool as the mom was.

    4. Re:Family members by Servants · · Score: 1

      Presumably that is exactly why the man is going to some trouble to work out the legal details with his estate planners.

    5. Re:Family members by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cryofeast? is this like feasting on the frozen dead or something ...?

    6. Re:Family members by Actinide · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all covered by H.G. Wells, in When the Sleeper Awakes, written in 1899. A sleeper wakes from a coma to find his assets have grown to the extent that he literally owns the world, but that his trustees have become corrupt autocratic rulers in his name and most certainly don't want him awake again. This book is also notable for being the source of Asimov's vision of an Earth of huge covered cities where people get around on giant high-speed travellators, and for containing the first account of an aerial dogfight, written some years before the first plane flew.

  14. Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    So your trust fund has guardians. Big deal. What are you going to do, audit them? You're frozen.

    The funds will be slowly leeched until you finally thaw and die, and at that point someone inherits it.

    Also, if there is any kind of "$#!+ hits the fan" scenario, the government will confiscate these trust finds to finance the war. Again, you will thaw and die.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by RickPartin · · Score: 1

      "The funds will be slowly leeched until you finally thaw and die, and at that point someone inherits it. "

      One small correction: You must be legally dead before you can be frozen (in the US at least). Anything else would be considered assisted suicide.

    2. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      No, actually, many trusts run on their own quite nicely.

      Why? A properly maintained trust *is* a business in and of itself. It's lifetime employement for the maintainer and a host of other people. You don't need to kill the Golden Goose, you just need to keep it going.

      Ideally, the maintainers of the fund for "The Frozen" will plan on freezing themselves, as well. It's something that would keep running indefinitely.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    3. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Well, doesn't that open a legal pandora's box?

      So, you are legally dead if you are frozen. If you are legally dead, and then revived, is our legal system prepared to handle that? Especially if you are revived some 50 years later.

      "Yes, your honor, I was dead, but now I am alive again, and I want my things back."

      I think a lot of cases would have to be decided to understand how to handle someone who comes back.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      The thing about existing trusts is that there is actually some person or organization who owns it, and needs to have it run properly. The administrators of the fund know that one day they may be called to task by the benefactor of the trust (or whatever you call them.) They can be sued or put in jail or whatever.

      However, if the owner of the trust is on ice, they really can't check up on the administrators. If you schluff money off the top, or orchestrate things to get the money into your hands, who is going to try to find out where the money is going? A public defender isn't going to be snooping through the books of all the stiffs on ice. For practical purposes the owner of the fund is dead.

      Just as an example, perhaps the administrator 'forgets' to pay the cryogenic bill. The next of kin then gets the trust fund money. However, the administrators have taken a huge chunk out of it beforehand -- how would the next of kin know?

      If the people who ran these trusts were completely honest and trustworthy, yes, then they have an income for life. However, they could take the money, buy and island, and retire there. Who is going to go after them? The guy is on ice.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1
      "...Ideally, the maintainers of the fund for "The Frozen" will plan on freezing themselves, as well. It's something that would keep running indefinitely..."

      Survival of the trust is one part of the equation but they should also think about survival of the company who make cryonic possible. 25 000 don't seams a lot of money to keep their remains frozen for a long time. If there is no cryonic breakthrough soon enough the company will have to keep storing bodies and wont have any new cash input. After some time the company will crumble under debts and its remains will go to the dump.

      The guy who is planning to give himself back is 4 billions dollars should make another trust with lets say 2 billions that will finance the cryogenic institution and also finance research in the field of cryonic. That should boost is chances of coming back.

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    6. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by nr · · Score: 1

      It's not like all these people put on ice are childless, there will be alot of descendents around checking up on how their fathers, grandfathers, and grandgrandfathers money are doing.

    7. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      That's my point exactly. How much time are you going to spend checking on frozen dad's money? If the guys in suits come to you every year and say, "yup, everything looks good!" how would you be able to call them unless you yourself were an accountant, or you hired another accountant?

      Futhermore, if frozen dad dies, *you get his money*. This alone will make cryogenic trusts a practical impossibility.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    8. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Depends on your own interest in cryonics.

      I'd try to setup the trust in such a way that it would assure the lives of all my descendents, as well. They'd have to act as a "board", with "shareholders", leaving little room for error.

      I'd want to keep the trust going for my parents. I'd want to keep it going for my children. And I'd offer cryopreservation to all my descendants; go with the program, and you get eternal life.

      It's really no different than a religion, and there are plenty of people who devote themselves and their children's exsistance to an afterlive in Christ's Kingdon. I prefer to focus on something more material.

      Churches collapse over time. But many churchs can run for thousands of years. A cryonics "church" would hopefully last long enough.

      Besides, most of these people acknowledge there are substantial risk. Among cryonics pre-clients, you often hear the term, "Lottery Ticket". They know they may not wake up, they know they may wake up with nothing. But thats not the point; its one final adventure you can take when you are dying, and it gives you the chance to get beyond the one-sided door that is death.

      No different than a religion.....

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    9. Re:Yeah, sure, how will check up on these people? by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      So your trust fund has guardians. Big deal. What are you going to do, audit them? You're frozen.
      The "what are you going to do?" question is merely the beginning of a modern horror tale. A few thousand years ago, the answer was "My mummy will curse anyone who plunders my tomb." Then Hollywood turned it into "My mummy will revive and slowly shamble up to the terror-paralyzed plunderer, and strangle him."

      Now, here is where you write your own script. It begins with, "My corpsicle will supernaturally protect its assets by ..." Good luck, and I'm looking forward to the movie.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  15. H.G. Wells did it by 246o1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    In "When the Sleeper Wakes," a guy is in a coma for a thousand years, wakes up and his money has taken over the world. Highly recommend it, but that's because I like Wells a lot.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
    1. Re:H.G. Wells did it by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      In "When the Sleeper Wakes," a guy is in a coma for a thousand years, wakes up and his money has taken over the world. Highly recommend it, but that's because I like Wells a lot.


      Thanks for the reading tip. I just found that story at Project Gutenberg and added it to my collection of stuff to read when I go to Afghanistan next month.

      http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/775

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re:H.G. Wells did it by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      How does one's money take over the world?

    3. Re:H.G. Wells did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah great! Another web site I can't cn-access. Bloody walls :(

    4. Re:H.G. Wells did it by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      If you are just wanting to grab that one story, just fire up a Gnutella client and search for HG-Welles-When-the-Sleeper-Wakes.txt

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    5. Re:H.G. Wells did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like this!!!

      Ha Ha Ha ha....

      Bill

    6. Re:H.G. Wells did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who are interested, or just bored about work can take a look here:

      http://www.online-literature.com/wellshg/sleeperwa kes/

  16. How to get rich quick. by Danga · · Score: 1

    1) Get wealthy people to give you their money when they die so you can invest it for when they return.

    2) Pay someone to accidently leave the door to the freezer full of people open over the weekend.

    3) PROFIT!!!

    I know they aren't put in a freezer, it just added to the joke.
    Seriously though I wonder what would happen to the money if something catastrophic happened and the bodies were ruined.

    --
    Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    1. Re:How to get rich quick. by mscnln · · Score: 1

      1) Get wealthy people to give you their money when they die so you can invest it for when they return.

      2) Pay someone to accidently leave the door to the freezer full of people open over the weekend.

      3) PROFIT!!!

      Ahem... aren't you missing a step?

    2. Re:How to get rich quick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the body is ruined the moment it is frozen as most cells are destroyed during the process. This "cryonics" thing is a scam.

  17. Meanwhile in Applied Cyrogenics ... by slashbob22 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Terry: Welcome to the world of tomorrow!
    Lou: Why do you always have to say it that way?
    Terry: Haven't you ever heard of a little thing called showmanship? Come, your destiny awaits!"

    Futurama Pilot

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  18. Life imitating art by McFadden · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this also the original plot for "Red Dwarf" - the BBC SciFi sitcom. Dave Lister a 3rd class technician on a Mining Corporation spacecraft gets put into suspended animation as a punishment for smuggling a cat aboard the spaceship. Something goes wrong on the ship and he isn't re-animated (the crew disappears). He wakes up 3 million years later and discovers he left 2 pence (or some equally trivial amount) in a bank account and from the interest accrued is now the richest man in the universe.

    1. Re:Life imitating art by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      Isn't it several billion years? Also the cat has evolved into a humanoid life form with a religion based on Lister being their god and they all want to go to the mythical land of Fiji.

    2. Re:Life imitating art by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Yeeeesh.

      Nope. There is a quick throwaway to his having left tuppence in an account and thus acquiring vast fortune (and bankrupting Earth). However the next sentence points out that he left a light on, so the electrical company wants its [5*value of Listers bank account] right now, thank you. Plus late payment fees.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    3. Re:Life imitating art by dotgain · · Score: 1
      Nup, the parent is right, three million years.

      Your second point is right, though.

    4. Re:Life imitating art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankyou for sharing the plot details of a science fiction cult classic with us.
       
      I, as a slashdotter, have never seen an episode of Red Dwarf!

  19. One Word by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Diversification

  20. Unthawed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that mean... frozen?

  21. Death, taxes, and taxes after death by Landshark17 · · Score: 0

    If this becomes a widespread practice, the government will find some way to tax the assets you leave for reclaiming.

    --
    This sig is false.
  22. Don't forget to turn off the light! (Red Dwarf) by Artega+VH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of this little sequence from Red Dwarf:

    Holly: They're from the NorWEB Federation.
    Lister: What's that?
    Holly: NorthWestern Electricity Board. They want you, Dave.
    Lister: Me? Why? What for?
    Holly: For your crimes against humanity.
    Lister: You what?!
    Holly: Seems when you left Earth, three million years ago, you left two half-eaten German sausages on a plate in your kitchen.
    Lister: Did I?
    Holly: You know what happens to sausages left unattended for three million years?
    Lister: Yeh, they go mouldy.
    Holly: Your sausages, Dave, now cover seven-eighths of the Earth's surface. Also, you left seventeen pounds, fifty pence in your bank account. Thanks to compound interest you now own 98% of all the world's wealth. And because you hoarded it for three million years, nobody's got any money except for you and NorWEB.
    Lister: Why NorWEB?
    Holly: You left a light on in the bathroom. I've got a final demand here for one hundred and eighty billion pounds.
    Lister: A hundred and eighty billion pounds!! You're kidding!
    Holly, wearing glasses, nose and moustache: April Fool.
    Lister: But it's not April!
    Holly: Yeah, I know. But I can't be waiting six months with a red-hot jape like that underneath me hat.

    --
    groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
  23. h2g2 by gijoel · · Score: 0

    Mr Pizer will be dead for the next 100 years for taxation purposes.

    My tired little brain aches for the cold sleep of a cyronics chamber.

  24. Sorry, it's not a joke by jpardey · · Score: 1

    The second step is always "?"

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
    1. Re:Sorry, it's not a joke by Danga · · Score: 1

      So what are you the joke nazi now?

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  25. Larry Niven wrote about this by zuhl · · Score: 1

    And in his future, it didn't work out so well for the "corpsicles."

    Their heirs either made of with the dough or society cut them up to use as recycled parts (organ donation).

    That's probably not the future the "cryonauts" would like to hear about. Corpsicle is a way better word than cryonaut anyway, and probably more descriptive, since won't their cell walls burst when frozen?

    1. Re:Larry Niven wrote about this by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      So everything you people know about cryo comes from science fiction novels?

      Actually, what really happens to cells is that the intracellular spaces suck the water out of them and damage them through dehydration. The point of vitrification is to prevent that.

      Anyway, at worst I'll be dead and maybe in some metaphysical realm, and no longer caring about how stupid people will think my gamble was. But I won't be any less dead if I don't try it, so I have nothing (except money that I can't take with me) to lose.

    2. Re:Larry Niven wrote about this by zuhl · · Score: 1

      Well, I think I was admitting that I didn't really know squat about cryo, since I asked a question about it!

      But thanks for the info on vitrification. I hadn't thought about frozen embryos, kidneys, etc. Obviously there is a way to freeze cells without them bursting.

      I still like the word corpsicle better than cryonaut.

    3. Re:Larry Niven wrote about this by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      So everything you people know about cryo comes from science fiction novels?

      As opposed to what, exactly? What else is cryogenics at this point, if not science fiction desperately hoping to become science fact?

    4. Re:Larry Niven wrote about this by JPyun · · Score: 1

      People don't have cell walls. Plants do. We have cell membranes.

      /Pedantic mode off.

    5. Re:Larry Niven wrote about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyway, at worst I'll be dead and maybe in some metaphysical realm.

      No, at worst you'll be dead and *not* in some metaphysical realm.
    6. Re:Larry Niven wrote about this by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, see "A World Out Of Time" for the great spin on this.

      Basically, guy wakes up in someone else's body hundreds of years in the future, where the State controls everyone and everything... from their point of view, they gave a convicted criminal a new personality (by extracting it from his frozen corpse). He has no rights, no family, no money, no nothing... except for the knowledge that if he doesn't prove useful to the state, they'll just wipe him and move on to the next frozen personality...

      An excellent book, BTW -- one of Niven's better work, IMHO.

    7. Re:Larry Niven wrote about this by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      It's a moderately sized field of peer-reviewed research concerned with preserving organs and tissues for transplantation + several companies who develop cryoprotectants for use by these researchers, but whose work also has spinoff benefits for organizations like Alcor and the Cryonics Institute. These organizations, I am told, specialize strictly in cryosuspending patients and keeping suspended. I wish that Alcor did more work on the revival end of the problem, but I understand their point of view. They want to do just one thing and do it well. They're hoping that as interest in cryonics grows, eventually some NIH or privately sponsored research team will pick up the complicated but not impossible task of revival of whole mammals from total, -210*C freezing.

    8. Re:Larry Niven wrote about this by Upsilon+Andromedea · · Score: 1

      Niven also wrote a short story early in his career about an astronaut who lands on Pluto and has equipment problems or something. At the last minute I believe he steps outside and turns off his suite heater in a last ditch gamble to be instantly frozen and preserved for discovery by the next mission to Pluto.

      My recall is sketchy.

      The story is told in the first person narrative in n-year intervals. As Pluto closes on the Sun enough to warm up the astronaut enough for trace activity in the brain, which Niven proposes as consciousness, the astronaut thinks the story narrative.

      --
      freeman
  26. and the offspring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he thinks his kids aren't going to pull the plug after 5 minutes he's nuts!

  27. Nothing New Here by twitter · · Score: 1
    We all know that Elvis is still alive. Oh yeah, don't forget to pay royalties if you paint his image on black velvet.

    Hmmmm, Thank you, thank you very much.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Nothing New Here by Tripax · · Score: 1

      Really, nothing new. Even Ted Williams froze himself. And its not just for eccentric rich guys. Eccentric rich guys who know science such as engeneer Bart Kosko have expressed their wish to be preserved using cryonic suspension. All that is needed is the ability to engineer biological tissue at the cellular level.

  28. Scary by tmandry · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can't take it with you. So Arizona resort operator David Pizer has a plan to come back and get it.

    Does anyone else think this sounds like a bad horror movie?

    1. Re:Scary by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      Or pr0no.

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    2. Re:Scary by Onuma · · Score: 1

      ...but when he wakes up he finds out his money has come back to get him

      --
      What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  29. Re:Rule against perpetuities - Unthawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unthawed == re-frozen, no?

  30. As long as by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 1

    As long as he doesn't waste it on the last anchovies in the world, he'll be fine.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
  31. Cryogenics and impotency. by CyricZ · · Score: 1, Funny

    My greatest fear would be getting frozen, and then being successfully thawed, except that the freezing process leads to permanent impotency. Frostbite of the cock, one might say.

    Then again, I have not sustained, let alone maintained, an erection in a couple of decades. So maybe getting cryogenically frozen wouldn't be that harmful after all.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Cryogenics and impotency. by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Would you like me to mail you a bottle of viagra and the pornographic magazine of your choice? Modern science has declared you don't have to slink limply into the good night.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:Cryogenics and impotency. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Then again, I have not sustained, let alone maintained, an erection in a couple of decades. So maybe getting cryogenically frozen wouldn't be that harmful after all.

      Great! Thanks for sharing!

  32. Hope he doesn't leave any lights on... by bravehamster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    HOLLY: They're from the NorWEB Federation.
    LISTER: What's that?
    HOLLY: NorthWestern Electricity Board. They want you, Dave.
    LISTER: Me? Why? What for?
    HOLLY: For your crimes against humanity.
    LISTER: You what?!
    HOLLY: Seems when you left Earth, three million years ago, you left two
        half-eaten German sausages on a plate in your kitchen.
    LISTER: Did I?
    HOLLY: You know what happens to sausages left unattended for three
        million years?
    LISTER: Yeah, they go mouldy.
    HOLLY: Your sausages, Dave, now cover seven-eighths of the Earth's
        surface. Also, you left seventeen pounds, fifty pence in your bank
        account. Thanks to compound interest you now own 98% of all the
        world's wealth. And because you hoarded it for three million years,
        nobody's got any money except for you and NorWEB.
    LISTER: Why NorWEB?
    HOLLY: You left a light on in the bathroom. I've got a final demand here
        for one hundred and eighty billion pounds.
    LISTER: A hundred and eighty billion pounds?!! You're kidding!
    HOLLY: (Wearing a Grouch-Marx glasses-nose-and-moustache) April Fool.
    LISTER: But it's not April!
    HOLLY: Yeah, I know. But I can't be waiting six months with a red-hot
        jape like that underneath me hat.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  33. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, this obviously belongs to the "Your rights offline" section.
    Editors, relocate!

  34. The easiest way. by Reeses · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the easiest way to do this is to freeze yourself, hopefully in a way that your DNA won't degrade. Once cloning technology is viable, have yourself cloned, and leave your money to your eventual clone.

    If mind transfer technology is available, then do that, but that might be a ways further off.

    --
    Reeses
  35. Y'know by ilyanep · · Score: 1

    I bet that once this becomes a viable and popular option, banks will suddenly start putting limits on interest (or something like the fact that interest stops while you're dead).

    --
    ~Ilyanep
    To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
  36. Why am I thinking of The Time Machine? by Scoldog · · Score: 1

    "Like some 1,000 other members of the "cryonics" movement, Mr. Pizer has made arrangements to have his body frozen in liquid nitrogen as soon as possible after he dies"

    I for one, welcome our new defrosted Stupid-Age overlords

    So, he'll be dead in this time, but hoping that future generations will be able to provide life?

    I think he's hoping for storyline of "The Time Machine" to come true. I'd LMAO if this shmuck gets Frankenstien'ed instead!

    --
    This space for rent
    1. Re:Why am I thinking of The Time Machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I for one, welcome our new defrosted Stupid-Age overlords

      Hahahah! Genius! You HAD to say it! Hilarious!

  37. this works? since when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    when you freeze a cell (single cell of your body) the water molecules will freeze, expanding the cell untill its walls break. just freezing this guy would kill him... let alone save him... test it with a daisy and liquid nitro

    1. Re:this works? since when? by pimproot · · Score: 1

      Actually, not all forms of ice are less dense than water. Ice V, specifically, is very close to the density of water.

      http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/phase.html

    2. Re:this works? since when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's dumb too, but humans and plants have radically different cellular structures - for one, we don't have cell walls. That's why we can take penicillin without it bending our cells out of shape.

  38. You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps rich people are the ones worrying about preserving their assets for the future, but I don't want people to get the impression that you have to be rich to be a cryonicist.

    That mistaken assumption is what caused me to take so long to take the plunge.

    I'm a grad student, I make 20k/year, and I have a cryo contract. As a full-time student I pay $199 annually and my life insurance policy ($90k coverage) premiums cost about $1k per annually. If I wanted to, I could have taken out a term life insurance policy and I'd be paying in the low hundreds, but since by definition this is an arrangement you'd want to make for the duration of your life, I thought it would be better to lock in a good whole life insurance rate while I'm still young and healthy. Plus my policy has a safety margin of $10k over the $80k neurosuspension fee.

    And that's me, a starving PhD student. Some of you people with real jobs can fund your cryo policy, and toss some money into a trust fund for yourself, and have some left over for charity and heirs.

    Cryonics is a long-shot, but unlike many other beliefs about life after death, it doesn't contradict the observed laws of physics. I don't ridicule those beliefs or take any action to restrict them, no matter how alien to my way of thinking they may seem. I therefore expect a free and pluralistic society to reciprocate this courtesy toward my own beliefs.

    1. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'll freeze you when you are dead for only 150 a year.

    2. Re:You don't have to be rich. by rmpotter · · Score: 1

      Looks like your fees go up quite a bit after you stop being a student. Even if they don't, suppose you instead got a modest 7% interest on that $199/year over 45 years -- that would give you $60,844.60 to play with in your dotage. Anyhow, good luck with the frozen head thing ;-)

      --
      Is this sig nificant?
    3. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps rich people are the ones worrying about preserving their assets for the future, but I don't want people to get the impression that you have to be rich to be a cryonicist.

      Maybe not, but the OP has a point: if and when you wake up, will it do you much good to wake up a) broke, and b) without a marketable skill? You'll be about as useful to the new society as a buggy driver is to ours. Worse, you'll probably have a huge medical bill--while you've paid for the suspension (although how can they guarantee the rate?) you couldn't have possibly paid for the cure that will bring you back, as they can't at this point know how expensive it'll be to give you the cure, since it doesn't exist.

      Really, that sounds great. You might wake up someday, but you'll be broke, jobless, a relative idiot, nowhere to live, no friends or family, and maybe will have a crushing medical bill. Thanks, but I think I might prefer to stay dead.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    4. Re:You don't have to be rich. by RFC959 · · Score: 5, Funny

      will it do you much good to wake up a) broke, and b) without a marketable skill?


      So coming out of cryosleep is like graduating with a liberal arts degree, then?
    5. Re:You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It never ceases to astound me how many things there are out there that people think are worse than death. To me, death is the one definite way to lose whatever game we're playing. Maybe people have a more literal belief in heaven than I do. Maybe people are in deep denial about the implacable finality of death. It's none of my business, though. Some people would rather be dead than stupid and broke, and I respect their beliefs.

      Call me a throwback then, because I'd rather be alive and keep on struggling to stay that way as long as possible. And the further in the future, the better. To put this into perspective, I'd rather be a homeless guy today than a medieval noble. Again, to each their own.

    6. Re:You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Looks like your fees go up quite a bit after you stop being a student.


      Yup. I'll worry about that when I get there. My paycheck goes up too when I'm a post-doc, and up again when I'm teaching bio 101 to freshmen. Not a lot, but enough.


      suppose you instead got a modest 7% interest on that $199/year


      I intend to invest as well. Not that I know of too many investments that can predictably average a 7% yearly return, especially when peak oil has whatever economic effects it's going to have.


      Anyhow, good luck with the frozen head thing ;-)


      And good luck with the literal ascension to heaven or literal reincarnation to all the die-hard (no pun intended) non-cryonicists out there. I hope to God that you're right and I'm wrong (because then we'll all end up in the same place after all, except the fundies of course).
    7. Re:You don't have to be rich. by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      Just be prepared to wake up in a Death Cube and then wake up again, and again, and again...

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    8. Re:You don't have to be rich. by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Think of the chicks. They'll take over the world anyways. Might as well enjoy your stay. :P

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    9. Re:You don't have to be rich. by zcat_NZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No job skills? I dispute that. He'd be the ultimate authority on our current period of 'history', and considering the amount of information being stored in DRM-locked formats on short-term digital media, he might wake up in a future that knows almost nothing about this time.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    10. Re:You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends on when you're thawed. There's a theory in cryonics circles, though, that the reviving will proceed in a LIFO manner because the later someone gets frozen, the better the available technology will be, and the easier they will be to revive. The "early adopters" might get revived last, after the medicine of the time has had plenty of practice with the easy cases.

      If this is correct, it would mean that the handfull of people frozen now will be the authoritative source of information about the late 20th century... but they'll get revived after you do, so you'll get your time in the sun with your knowledge of the early -to-mid 21st century with the still relatively small number of people who will be frozen at the same time you are.

    11. Re:You don't have to be rich. by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      But you can give interviews as "the guy from 200 years ago". One of a kind story, man.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    12. Re:You don't have to be rich. by whassaname · · Score: 1

      ... but you do have to be stupid ;)

    13. Re:You don't have to be rich. by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      You might wake up someday, but you'll be broke, jobless, a relative idiot, nowhere to live, no friends or family, and maybe will have a crushing medical bill.

      Depending on how long your "sleep" is, you will probably wake up to find the world is full of nasty evolved germs to which you have no resistance. Then again if you sleep long enough you might wake up with a immunization for all disease. Scary thought, the first one.

    14. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, Cryonics Institute only costs half as much. Might be worth looking into, if you haven't already.

    15. Re:You don't have to be rich. by pontifier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After I signed up with alcor I felt a kind of future-historical perspective shape the way I look at issues and events in our time. sometimes I'll think about a person from the future obsessed with the past, and think "They would realy like to be where I am right now", and it makes me feel good to be here in our primitive times, still arguing about this or that when it probably doesn't matter that much to the far future how things go, just that they do.

      by the way.. I've found price to be the biggest limiting factor among people I know as to why they havn't signed up. most people I've talked to about cryonics can see that any chance to be revived is better than none.

      --
      -John Fenley
    16. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starving PhD student? You bastards make good money, and you fucking know it! The only starving grad students are studying for professional degrees, like a law or medical degree... their funds are tight. Academic grad students get PAID... for pretty much doing nothing (grade a few papers, teach a class or two -aka babysitting-, and maybe get around to your dissertation on the weekends)... you lying shit.... Once you GET your degree... that's when you starve. Enjoy it while you can, air thief.

    17. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny. I subscribe to the wake-up-as-an-idiot philosophy. Think about it. Humans would have evolved beyond you. You would be the most genetically defective, ailing, disease-ridden, ugly, dumb, weak and useless human ever to live. You could make the Guiness Book of Records 2500 A.D Edition, in that category. They could wake you up for their personal amusement and watch the gibbering idiot from the past in a zoo-type environment, where people pay to shoot you with a paintball cannon, or to watch in stupor at the inane conversations you try to start.

    18. Re:You don't have to be rich. by springbox · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe not, but the OP has a point: if and when you wake up, will it do you much good to wake up a) broke, and b) without a marketable skill? You'll be about as useful to the new society as a buggy driver is to ours.

      Or maybe, if you wake up you'll be assigned to a position in society based on your capabilities. Haven't you watched Futurama?

    19. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless after 500 years of political correctness men have lost their balls. At which point my primitive and nerdly instincts will show women of that time what a real man is!

    20. Re:You don't have to be rich. by localman · · Score: 1

      The only point I take exception with is the idea that you'd be a "relative idiot". I think there's a funny tendancy for us to think that over time people become more intelligent. They don't. At least not on the time scale of a few thousand years. I am sure that there were people in ancient Egypt who were brighter and more intellectually ambitions than I. I may have more acquired knowledge in certain modern fields of research, but I can hardly claim much credit for that.

      I think if such a person were plopped into our modern day they would, after a degree of struggle, they'd be able to make sense of it.

      But the rest of your point is taken. I'd still prefer a chance, I think :)

      Cheers.

    21. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      For most people, existance has to be at least somewhat pleasant in order to be worth it. That's why the idea of Hell scares so many people - interminable, infinite pain. If oblivion was believed to be even worse, religions would have used that instead.

    22. Re:You don't have to be rich. by merikari · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Some rich people say that poor people are poor because they are lazy. So, no problem for the rich people if they're broke in the future - they can just work extra hard. Cause everyone knows, it's just hard work that's needed to become ultra-rich. There's always money in sorting carbage in 3rd world countries. Or you can maybe sell a couple of organs, if they're not past the 'best before' date.

      --
      My other SIG is a Sauer.
    23. Re:You don't have to be rich. by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      So you wake up, find yourself useless and hating life, say "well, it was worth a try", and kill yourself. What's the problem?

      Personally, I think I'm going to do this - I mean, it can't be *worse* than just dying.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    24. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot on. This is *exactly* what I thought.

      Btw, I wouldn't wake up in a world where my childs are dead. Of course, the OP is too young to understand that.

      Using those 100k$ that cryo will cost hime, are much better used having a better life now with living friends and family.

    25. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends on how advanced society is and how it advances. Intelligence is influenced by genetics/womb, childhood experiences and learning.

      An advanced society may have altered the first so much that they are now super-humans compared to us and the changes go so deep they cannot "upgrade" a present-day person without destroying who they are. Assuming they have immortality this one must have a solution already present.

      The second would probably cause less drastic changes, although again you'd be at a disadvantage compared to those people who grow up in that time period (more so if they use some advanced child rearing practices designed to maximize intelligence). Also I believe with time intelligence becomes more dependent on genetics/womb than childhood experiences, although differences may still exist. In reality the greatest problem in this case may be that their society is so alien to us we are unable to cope with it. Assuming they have immortality this one must have a solution already present.

      The last one, learning, is probably the easiest to fix. Combined with some advanced drugs you can probably get up to pace in terms of sheer knowledge rather quickly, may even be able to change things which currently are in many ways hard wired.

    26. Re:You don't have to be rich. by typical · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I'm pretty sure that sufficient physical torture will make you want to be dead.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    27. Re:You don't have to be rich. by typical · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think if such a person were plopped into our modern day they would, after a degree of struggle, they'd be able to make sense of it.

      The problem is that you're ignoring a lot of learning (and *unlearning* that will have to be done).

      One of the largest tasks I can think of that a linguist could face is to be confronted with a totally unknown language with no Rosetta Stone and have to work it out from scratch. I think that it would be a staggering achievement for most linguists to be able to write "Created the first dictionary to translate to and from this language".

      And yet nearly every person in the world has done this *as a child*. They started out with no common ground -- they can't think "Okay, what's 'rock' in this language?". They figured out not only the language but all the concepts that it attempts to express. Even the guy that pumps gas at the gas station did that. That's an amazing intellectual accomplishment.

      How long does it take to learn to use a computer effectively? I mean, ground zero, a computer newbie to the level that an power user on Slashdot has? Three years? Four years? Surely at least that.

      You've spent a lot of time learning all this. If you get frozen at age sixty, that is *sixty years* of learning and training that you've expended on building yourself. Sure, some things stay the same -- the laws of physics are probably going to remain the same, and throwing a ball in the future is probably going to be similar to doing so in the present. But language shifts quickly -- English from a few hundred years ago is totally incomprehensible to an English speaker today. All the locations and things that you've learned -- how to drive a car, etc -- are useless. And there's knowledge to be *unlearned*, as well -- maybe there are no toilets in the future. Maybe cooking knowledge is obsolete in the future because we have automated food production devices that everyone uses.

      Maybe for a young child, this wouldn't be so drastic, but I think that it would be quite a shift for a senior citizen.

      I mean, honestly, suppose Benjamin Franklin was around today. In his time, he was a learned man in many fields and a scientist, as well as a diplomat. But today, we've shot so far by him in the fields he student that he wouldn't have much more applicable knowledge than a teen would. Mathematics is still the same, but the ability to rapidly do arithmetic is no longer a crucial skill. You don't ride horses, you don't use an outhouse, we have childproof caps on medicine bottles. Our aesthetics have changed -- the comfortable styles that he grew up with will be gone, replaced by smooth, simple, artificial structures. His political knowledge would be out of date and useless. Social norms are quite different from his day. Heck, he didn't have *railroads* in his time. I'm sure that based on who he is and the fact that he was exceptional for his time, he'd find a way to get along...but I don't think that it would be all that easy. And the question really is -- would society be better off with an aging man with a good knowledge from 250 years ago, or someone who has learned from the start to live in current societyy.

      I also wouldn't trust the cryo-storage companies. They plan to keep you frozen for, what, a hundred years? No company worries about anything one hundred years in the future. Four is usually pushing it. Nobody except for maybe your great-great-grandkids will have an interest in ensuring that you are safely revived.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    28. Re:You don't have to be rich. by typical · · Score: 1

      Remember that people can lose immunity to things too. You might be a nasty disease vector from the future, bringing revived bacteria from many years ago back into play.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    29. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Xophmeister · · Score: 1

      If you were in the first handful to be reanimated, then you'd probably attract some kind of celebrity status (assuming future generations grow progressively more superficial). You wouldn't need "skills" - besides, you could always be a history teacher.

      --

      Christopher Harrison

    30. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duuuuuuudddeeee! Don't post this on Slashdork! I don't want any of these idiots to have a chance of being around in the future.

    31. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem that the Rosetta stone solved was that of deciphering a dead, written language. When immersed in a foreign-language environment, an adult of average intelligence and good motivation will learn to communicate perfectly well, although they will probably retain an accent and make some grammatical errors for many years. Look up Berlitz language schools, for example. It's not at all impossible even for an old person to learn a new language - there are plenty of retirees who take up foreign languages as a hobby.

      The situation would of course be different if people start relying on genetic engineering and computer implants to improve their intelligence, thus creating a society that may be all too alien for us. However, it is still very speculative if those ideas will ever be economically applicable in practice, and even if they were, there will surely remain cultures and groups of people that refuse to choose that route.

    32. Re:You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Not even in the first handfull in general. In the first handfull that represents your particular generation. And since the idea is still pretty novel, there is still only a handfull getting suspended during any given generation.

    33. Re:You don't have to be rich. by thesnarky1 · · Score: 1
      No, communications

      Obligatory Simpsons Quote... Well, you all know it already. "Da, is fake major"

    34. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will it do you much good to wake up a) broke, and b) without a marketable skill?

      Jesus Christ, have you people no sense of wonder? How can you worry about having no "marketable skill" when we're talking about seeing what the world would be like in 200 years? How can you even speculate about what skills may and may not be marketable -- maybe the first cryogenics patients, the oldest people alive, would be in enormous, unbelievable demands for all kinds of stuff? But even if they weren't, who cares? I'd do anything to be homeless, broke and useless for just a day 200 years in the future!

      I guess, however, that I could find muster some minimal, absolutely minimal, understanding of your position if the only thing you were saying were that you'd rather live your final days here than in the future. But that's not what you're saying. You're saying this:

      Really, that sounds great. You might wake up someday, but you'll be broke, jobless, a relative idiot, nowhere to live, no friends or family, and maybe will have a crushing medical bill. Thanks, but I think I might prefer to stay dead.

      And that I just cannot understand. You prefer to be dead than broke and jobless? I assume if all those things happened to you, you'd kill yourself in a heartbeat then?

      I just don't get you people. I seriously don't.

    35. Re:You don't have to be rich. by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      I mean, honestly, suppose Benjamin Franklin was around today. In his time, he was a learned man in many fields and a scientist, as well as a diplomat. But today, we've shot so far by him in the fields he student that he wouldn't have much more applicable knowledge than a teen would.

      Franklin would be revived, and probably do the talk show ciricut and appear on American Idol. Seriously, Ben would have no problems nowadays since he would have instant star power.

      I think a compelling question is, "Why would they want to revive Joe Shmoe?". Sure, I can see someone like Ben Franklin or Ted Williams being revived, but who is going to want to revive "Javalord"? Somehow I doubt my good Slashdot karma and java programming skills will be in demand 100-200 years from now. The question becomes especially relevant if cryonics 'caught on'. If you have 5 million people on ice, why would you revive them all? In what order do you actually revive them? Will the poor be less likely to be revived than the rich?

    36. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      To put this into perspective, I'd rather be a homeless guy today than a medieval noble.

      Well, I wouldn't. Have you spent a month on the streets, turning tricks to buy food? I would suppose that whatever medical institution revived you wouldn't just turn you out on the street, they'd give you some relocation assistance--but we don't do much for our destitute now when they show up at a hospital. I think medieval nobles had it pretty good compared to our destitute.

      Or maybe you're re-animated as an indentured servant bound by the laws of the future; to pay off your debt of re-animation and cure, you have to clean up the toxic waste left behind by our generation.

      Seems pretty optimistic, really, and conditions a lot on the generosity of strangers of the future, who are likely to hold this period (and it's inhabitants) in pretty low regard. If history tells us anything, it's that populations that can't defend their status tend to be degraded over a period of time--and being a frozen head for an indefinite period seems like it's asking for abuse.

      Well, I hope in the future you prove me wrong, and you look back at this post and laugh. But pleasant dreams.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    37. Re:You don't have to be rich. by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      And the question really is -- would society be better off with an aging man with a good knowledge from 250 years ago, or someone who has learned from the start to live in current societyy.

      I'm not really into cryonics at all (see my other post in this thread), but you bring up an interesting point that I don't see mentioned much.

      Imagine having Mr. Franklin come and give a lecture on what it was like back then. It might take him a while to learn, like, modern, like, English and stuff, but maybe it'd be better if he didn't. ;)

      Historians would love this. And I bet people would be willing to pay a lot to have someone as famous as Ben Franklin come and give a lecture.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    38. Re:You don't have to be rich. by leabre · · Score: 1

      There's a good chance the the first few people to be succesfully revived will be celebrities. But you're point is well taken, they will be about as overwhealmed in their day as a 1st centry Roman would be overwhealmed if he woke up in current society without a proper incubation period to adjust (the incubation period meaning his whole life from infancy).

      Thanks,
      Leabre

    39. Re:You don't have to be rich. by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1
      "I mean, honestly, suppose Benjamin Franklin was around today. In his time, he was a learned man in many fields"

      You picked a poor example with Franklin. The man was a writer and a publisher and he was smart. He'd write a book about what it's like to wake up after 200 years and it would be a run away best seller. Also what do you think people would pay to hear him speak? A better example would have been "some average Joe Blacksmaith" from the late 1700's Some guy who went to shool for 'till he was about eight then dropped out of the 3rd grade, and never left his home town. Prety common backthen. Anyone who is an artist, be it with paint, words or music could do well in any age.

    40. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could team up with another Go-go Reaganaut who was frozen due to his boneitis and try your hand at M&A.

    41. Re:You don't have to be rich. by greenhide · · Score: 1

      Aren't you a bit young to have a life insurance policy? It sounds like that, plus the cryo, suggests you have an unhealthy relationship with death.

      You should only get a life insurance policy to leave money for those you leave behind. That's the only reason.

      You want to talk about immortality? If this guy leaves the $10 million as a trust for scholarships in a fund making just 5% interest above inflation, he can pay for the tuition of around 10 college students a year for all time. And who knows who those students could become?

      I personally think this guy is sick. Anyone who wants to hold onto their money after they're dead has serious problems.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    42. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. He could do talk show, reality shows and maybe virtual reality shows if such things exist at that point in the future.

    43. Re:You don't have to be rich. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      I think that anybody who has a hard time understanding why death is bad has a problem seeing the obvious. But we can agree to disagree.

      I don't know what I'd do with $10 million if I had it. I'd probably give some of it to charity. But certainly not all of it... a person is entitled to do what they like with their own money. Otherwise it's not called charity, it's called taxation.

      Note that it didn't say either way whether or not he's given to charity... he may have, and those posters exhibiting the standard class envy might be acting very ugly therefore.

    44. Re:You don't have to be rich. by greenhide · · Score: 1

      A) I'm not saying that death isn't bad. I'm saying that it also isn't likely that you can ever overcome it. In other words, you can hate to die but accept that when it happens, it is more or less final. And if someone ever does find a way to unfreeze people and bring them back to life, what are the odds that the "second life" will really be worth it?

      Finally, I'm not suggesting that anyone who has money left over must give it all to charity. I'm simply saying that immortality isn't gained through a freezer -- it's gained through leaving a real legacy, be it a trust for scholarships or a wide circle of friends or lives that you've positively touched, a work of art, etc.

      It may be so that this gentleman has donated to charity in the past. Fine. But it's nonetheless his goal to leave the money he has left when he dies to himself. I suppose it is his money, but I can't help thinking it'd be better if it went to someone living instead.

      Personally, I find the idea of taking it with you when you die to be a very selfish act, but I suppose that's just me. Oh, and don't forget that there's a reason that class envy exists -- there are actually a lot of people starving to death in the world, who live miserable existences. And that's due, among other things, to the existence of economic inequality in the world. So forgive me if I find expensive luxories such as cyrogeny to be a bit distasteful. It's socially acceptable to be disdainful of the poor; why can't I be disdainful of the rich? Some of them became so through hard work, but not all of them.

      Plus, I'm an organ donor, so I'm not sure how that'd work out. :-)

      Disclaimer: My family was rich when I was growing up (my dad, a psychiatrist, made around $100k/year), and have been living for the past 5 years or so on $23k/year, so I'm not exactly the poster boy for poverty.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    45. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't buy the "technology and culture would advance too much" argument. It's entirely plausible that the core skills that make someone smart or savvy in a particular age, are transferable to any age. "Learning how to learn", as the cliche goes.

      Ol Ben Franklin would likely need a couple years, and an internet connection, and possibly a stiff drink. But given access to enough info and time, he'd likely soon be requesting lasik surgery, webspace for a blog and a government grant.

    46. Re:You don't have to be rich. by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Feel free to google on the phrase "Flynn effect". IQs have been going up an about 3 points per decade since they started measuring them a hundred years ago. Granted, it's almost certainly not caused by evolution, but by improvements in communication and education.

    47. Re:You don't have to be rich. by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Of course, this assumes that in the future there will be absolutely no humanitarians, and no other motivation for people to want to revive cryonauts simply for the sake of allowing someone to live again. Personally, I'm a bit more optimistic about the future than that.

      However, even without any altruistic motivation you're still going to be revived. The Patient Care Trust is legally obligated to care for you until the time you are revived. At some point the cost of doing cellular-level repair and reviving you drops below the cost to keep you in storage.

      As to the order in which people will be revived, that's likely to be a technical decision. Those who were suspended last will in general be the best preserved (since suspension technology isn't static, and has been improving steadily over the years), and hence the easiest to revive. So the general trend is likely to be last in-first out.

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    48. Re:You don't have to be rich. by localman · · Score: 1

      What a coincidence! Did you see the new slashdot article on the flynn effect?

      My first thought is that IQ tests are fairly imprecise to start with, and when you're tracking different tests at different times with different peoples... well, I'm not sure I'd believe that there's that much of a difference.

      But let's say you're right, improvements to the average IQ have been going up. That doesn't mean that smart people are any smarter. And that's what I'm talking about here.

      I admit, the average person stops learning and adapting at some point in their life. The earlier in their life they do this, the worse it would be to plop them into the distant future (or any time, for that matter). But for those who are constant learners, I think they could adapt to the new situation.

      Cheers.

  39. Instant by RickPartin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The one cool thing about freezing yourself that no one seems to mention is the process, if successful, will seem instant to you regardless of how many hundreds of years you're out for. Thinking of it that way makes it seem way more appealing. It's like a crude form of time travel.

    1. Re:Instant by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who's to say one wouldn't have dreams? Or just some kind of low-level pseudo-consciousness? Or something else entirely?

      I'm not saying that any of those are possible, but I am saying that, since no human being has ever been frozen, suspended for a "long" period of time, and then thawed and revived, saying anything about the subjective experience is an iffy proposition.

      I suspect that you're right - likely there'll be no notice of the lapsed time - but I wouldn't rule anything else out.

      Me, I'll probably get frozen. After all, if it fails, well, I was dead anyway, and if it succeeds, go me - any world that would revive me would have to be stable/desirable enough for me to want to live in it (the Niven story, while amusing, was pretty absurd). One extra life insurance policy to cover the expense of it, it seems like a cheap enough way to slightly hedge one's bets.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    2. Re:Instant by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The one cool thing about freezing yourself that no one seems to mention is the process, if successful, will seem instant to you regardless of how many hundreds of years you're out for.

      Heh. You hope it seems instantateous, at least. Until we thaw one of those suckers out and reanimate 'em, we won't know if they wake up saying "what was that?" or "OH MY GOD WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG, THE ETERNAL FREEZING LIMBO!!!!!!!!!"

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Instant by RickPartin · · Score: 1

      In this case though, the person must die before they are legally allowed to freeze the body. So unless dead people dream I don't see any problems with it.

    4. Re:Instant by malsdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you were having thoughts of anykind, "low-level pseudo-consciousness" or whatever, you would NOT be cryogenically frozen. Thoughts require large amounts of chemical reactions to occur in the brain and the whole point of cryogenics is to stop chemical reactions from happening as they are also what causes ageing.

      So by the very definition of cryogenics you would be thoughtless and completely unconscious for the entire time. Apart maybe from any wake-up period which possibly might be required during reanimation (not sure if its called reanimation?, I just remeber that word from Austin Powers).

    5. Re:Instant by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Sure, currently the law requires that people die first. However, from my understanding of the literature, a LOT of damage/decay happens because of that. In the future, I wouldn't be surprised if "right to die" also wound up allowing people who were terminally ill to have themselves frozen while still alive, as a way of reducing ischemic damage potential.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    6. Re:Instant by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was thinking about that waking-up/going to sleep part, I think, when I said that.

      I often hit my snooze alarm in the mornings. Nine minutes sometimes feels like hours when I'm in that half-dozing state. I can easily imagine some kind of similar subjective dilation of time-sense.

      My point was that, until we have a successful freezing and revival after an extended duration, we cannot know, for sure, what the subjective experience will be. As I said, I suspect that it will be near instantaneous, but there's still things like the snooze-button scenario to think about.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    7. Re:Instant by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      The one cool thing about freezing yourself that no one seems to mention is the process, if successful, will seem instant to you regardless of how many hundreds of years you're out for.

      How do you know?

    8. Re:Instant by castleguardian · · Score: 0

      Heh. You hope it seems instantateous, at least. Until we thaw one of those suckers out and reanimate 'em, we won't know if they wake up saying "what was that?" or "OH MY GOD WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG, THE ETERNAL FREEZING LIMBO!!!!!!!!!"
      Very similar to a short Steven King story called "The Jaunt". The premise of the story is that mankind has invented instantaneous teleportation devices, however, the user must be unconsious. While it took the physical body a fraction of a fraction of a second to teleport, it took a near-inifinite amount of time for the mind.

      --
      --- Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.
    9. Re:Instant by tomlouie · · Score: 1

      Read it as a kid, loved it. Travelers has to be anesthetized before they went through. A kid traveling with family holds his breathe to beat the system, so as to go thru awake. Come out the other side screaming "I held my breathe, I wanted to SEE, I WANTED TO SEE WHAT IT WAS LIKE!!!" and then proceeded to gouge his own eyes out. Hilarity ensues.

    10. Re:Instant by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Um, because at liquid nitrogen temperatures there is effectively no metabolic activity whatsoever? This isn't rocket science, 'ya know. It's not even voodoo.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  40. Mr Pizer, please wake up now... by rmpotter · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... You've been frozen for 150 years, but your Cryo company went under about 80 years ago. Actually that company has been bought and sold a number of times. You actually spent a few weeks in a meat locker in Chicago until a new facility could be found. Unfortunately we were legally obligated to dip into your "inheritance" to pay for emergency cooling and relocation. You still have a few dollars left, but after converting them into American Yen, it looks like you will have to go back to work. Mr Pizer? Are you listening to me? Ah... yes, where is the rest of your body? Well, you see after the last market crash the Cryo industry was forced to make a few, um, cutbacks. What now? Well, Mr. Pizer, you've lucked into a wonderful Brave New World, you know. You've been assigned to the circus with all the others. You'll be pulled by trained monkeys round the ring on a special cart along with the other heads. It doesn't pay all that well, but it will keep the feeding tube flowing and cover any back taxes owing. And it does make the children laugh! Mr. Pizer? Now don't be angry with me Mr. Pizer...

    --
    Is this sig nificant?
    1. Re:Mr Pizer, please wake up now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's the latest trend, isn't it....quit while you're a head..........
      OK, sorry, that was really bad.

    2. Re:Mr Pizer, please wake up now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:5, Plagarized from someone with writing talent)

    3. Re:Mr Pizer, please wake up now... by sgcarter · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but that just seems MUCH funnier if read with a British accent.

  41. Who would want you? by bhhenry · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Funny to see this article so soon after viewing Final, a movie about a man who wakes up in a mental ward after being cryogenically frozen and then finds himself a ward of the state in more than one way. Or the Philip K. Dick story I just read about a man who travels into the future, but isn't worried about making his way, because he is a doctor, and society can always use a doctor, right?

    Seriously, if the technology worked as planned, what would you do after being thawed? Go back to grade school to catch up on the basics? Would any of your skills be useful to anyone? Unless you were a popular historical icon, who would want to bother with you? An archeologist or historian?

    Add to all of this the fact that the population of Earth is already expanding at an alarming rate.

    --
    signature not found
    1. Re:Who would want you? by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Oh the population problem will get resolved one way or another long before cryonics becomes widespread. Even before life-extension by pharmaceutical or bioengineering means becomes widespread.

      And the life-history of the typical individual in a post-overpopulation world? Individuals being forced by economics or law to limit family size and wait longer before reproducing, exchanging quantity for quality. In such a world there would be an incentive to live longer and stay productive longer. At least, in scenarios that don't involve starving to death or dying of dysentery at 20 (the world in those scenarios probably wouldn't be able to afford to keep the cryonicists frozen in the first place).

    2. Re:Who would want you? by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Add to all of this the fact that the population of Earth is already expanding at an alarming rate.

      Actually, the population in Muslim Countries, Africa, India and China are expanding, the ones in the US and European countries are shrinking. As countries become more liberal, and more succesful in the world economy they have less children. The question is how to bring these countries up to speed. Some of them are on their way, others are not.

  42. Once those trusts get big enough... by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    ...I finally see a cure for Social Security problem. 100% Social Security Tax on the dead. They are going to need it once they are revived.

    1. Re:Once those trusts get big enough... by pimproot · · Score: 1

      Actually, it might be less expensive to PREEMPTIVELY freeze baby boomers before they begin hemorrhaging medical expenses. We can wake them up later, when we can afford it.

      Florida is already 50% shuffleboard.

  43. So... Even if we do get enough advances medically by timothyf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So... Even if we do get enough advances medically to do this, tell me why on earth would we /want/ to revive someone so selfish and materialistic as to want to do this? Sorry, couldn't help myself.

  44. Or better yet.... by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

    FRY: My God, it's the future! My parents, my coworkers, my girlfriend--I'll never see any of them again! {pause} Yahoo!

  45. decisions by wall0159 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The difficult part would have to be deciding when to cut one's losses with life and be frozen. Persumably, if he waits until he's actually dead, it might be too late...

    "I figure I have a better than even chance of coming back," he says. *laughing* based on WHAT?? Just goes to show - wealth doesn't corrolate with intelligence.

    (personally, I reckon his chances are more like 42%... ;-)

    1. Re:decisions by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      oops. I just read that U.S. law requires the person to be legally dead before they're 'frozen'. I still think the point is valid though. It would be interesting to see how this could link up with euthenasia...

  46. Reality cheque by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    As Robert Heinlein put it: "If you invest a substantial sum of money at a good interest rate, compounded monthly, it will eventually be worth nothing."

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  47. Has to be said... by TheDugong · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Kore^H^H^H^Hthe USA, only old people use cryogenics. Sorry.

  48. You forget the nano/biotech revolution comming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see, why, on a site like slashdot, that some people can't see the obvious nanotech and biotech breakthroughs that are comming in 5, 10, 15, 25 years etc.

    With most slashdotters being able to understand complex software and hardware systems, in the comming years it will be natural for future slashdotters to be able to handle the complexities of nano and biotech programming of nanotech assemblers and nanosensors and be able to do a lot of "matter" hacking even though there will, most likely, be a lot of corporations that would like to corner the nano/biotech market. For those of us who can remember the first Dr.dobbs and byte magazine (and other) magazine issues, and the earlier Radio Shack, commidor, apple, IBM pc's...the future is happening all over again, with the gradual acceptance that the emerging nano/biotech revolution will give us control of all the "computer" type DNA/RNA machinery inside our cells, we will be able to manipulate the aging process, fix (re-animate) frozen people. It may be hard to do, but, remember, they went to the moon in 9 years using slide rules and mainframe 32 bit computers with core memory, we should be able to advance nano/bio in the next 10 years to be able to demonstrate age halting/reversal in mice (the M-prize), and then, soon in people. Check out the CBS 60 min interview with aubre-de-gray a couple of weeks ago, it's too bad the Ray kurzwiel interview was also not included in that segment, maybe next time...

  49. New joke by LeonGeeste · · Score: 0

    Bob spends 100 years in cryogenic hibernation and then is thawed out. His first conversation goes like this:

    Bob: Just before I say anything else, I want to remind you that languages can change a lot in a hundred years, but I'm just going to talk like I did back then, so please don't take offense at anything, because I probably won't mean it that way.
    Them: [acknowledges comment and assures Bob they understand his position]
    Bob: So, the niggers still causin' all the problems?

    --
    Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    1. Re:New joke by magefile · · Score: 2, Funny

      Them: What's a nigger, pale boy?

    2. Re:New joke by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not so sure this is flamebait (I mean it is but...)
      Heinlein explored this basic concept (with a timewarp from a nuke) in Farhams Freehold.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:New joke by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      As did the old television show Time Trax. They even came up with their own slang term for white people: "Blanco." Personally, I don't see what was wrong with "Cracker."

      Good novel, though. I'm still trying to figure out why it was billed as his most controversial, however. I would have thought Stranger In A Strange Land would hold that honor seeing as I've seenit labeled as the "Hippy Bible" in essays before.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    4. Re:New joke by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      By todays standards (in the US) Stranger is the most contriversial, what with the free love and all. But back when Farhams was written race issues were more prevalent than now. (I realise there are still issues, but hopefully we'll get over that as a species before we wipe ourselves out).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:New joke by magefile · · Score: 1

      I've been misinterpreted here. My implication was not that power would shift so that caucasians would be the minority (or at least, not the group in power); my implication was that racial differences would perhaps begin to fade away, as we have more and more acceptance of interracial relationships and marriages.

    6. Re:New joke by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      It's scary, I read that book as a teenager, and completely missed the race thing. Either that or I forgot it. It seemed sufficient to my 80s mind that the peril of the future was that slavery could redevelop in different forms, including some not based on race.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  50. I see your quote and raise a Red Dwarf reference: by slashbob22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Teller: OK, you had a balance of 93 cents...
    Fry: Alright!
    Teller: And at an average of two-and-a-quarter percent interest over a period of 1000 years, that comes to ... $4.3 billion.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  51. Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by mrs+clear+plastic · · Score: 1

    We all know that your body is but a temporary home for your soul or your spirit.

    When the body dies, your spirit (**you**) move on. This should be very familiar with you Pagans
    out there. (Remeber that Sahman; Haloween; is the time when we re-unite with the spirits of our
    dead ancestors).

    Yes, science may be able to resurrect a dead body.

    But, what soul will inhabit it at that time? Most likely it will be either someone else or perhaps
    no soul at all. Perhaps you will end up with a 'living vegstible' with no spirit or soul.

    When I move on, I will either still be in the spirit world or will have come back as another
    being; not necessarily human; I could be a tree, rock, ocean, cloud, or animal.

    Heck, when I move on, and someone decides to cryogenically save my body; I may have had my rest
    in the spirit world and return to our world as a thunder cloud.

    I am now in the sky over the university where the research is going on and they are trying to
    ressurect my former temporary home.

    I might feel a bit angry that they think they can ressurect me.

    I might need to teach them a gentle little reminder.

    As a thunder cloud. I just might reach out with a bolt of lightning and knock out the
    power to the lab.

    And my companion, who is the mighty Oak tree standing next to the emergency power generator
    for the lab, might fall down and sever the fuel line.

    Or, as a thunder cloud, I embrace my sister spirit, the rainbow. I tell the rainbow to
    give inspiration to the eco-purists who then go in an sabotage the lab and gently return
    my former home back to the land (yet another sister spirit) where it belongs.

    Or picture this. I am in the spirit world; having not returned to your world. I learn of what
    is about to happen to my former temporary home. I converse with the other spirits and gently
    suggest that no one transcend to that particular body. They will end up with a vegstible.

    Luv

    --
    Cleara
    1. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by tannhaus · · Score: 1

      Or how about you leave that plant right where it is and not smoke it next time?

    2. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? Pass some of that over here, please.

    3. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the whole issue of whether a soul exists and its nature, you don't understand what cryogenics is. People in cryo are not DEAD, so reviving them isn't resurrecting them. By the theory you state, the soul would never leave the first body.

    4. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Actually, under current law, people can only be put into cryo after they are clinically dead.

      However, any religious/ethical/spiritual issues this raises are already raised every time people who are clinically dead for brief periods get revived on an operating table. This is just a quantitative, not a qualitative difference.

    5. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by Mancat · · Score: 1

      You sound just like every other crazy broad I've ever met in Seattle. No wonder it's the worst city for dating in America. What is it about this town that drives people to insanity?

      http://seattle.shmeng.com/

      --
      hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    6. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up you retarded feminist bitch.

    7. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by EvanED · · Score: 1

      You know, RESEARCH would usually be good. I should stop talking out of my ass. See, I was thinking that the premise was that you'd be frozen before you're dead so that when you were woken they could fix whatever was wrong with you. I doubt even in the future we'll see true reanimation, so putting a corpse in cryo doesn't make much sense.

      In retrospect, OF COURSE it works the way you say; I know enough law (though IANAL I've played one in Mock Trial and done some reading) that I should have known that I've never seen an exception to, say, assault or murder for putting someone in cryo, and that the person's consent isn't a defense (except I guess now in Oregon under very set conditions of euthanasia).

    8. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by humankind · · Score: 1

      His e-mail is from the Netherlands, which undoubtedly explains the extremely high quality of mind altering substances he was under the influence of when writing that rambling tripe.

    9. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't change the fact that mancat is still right regardless of the identity of the parent post in question

    10. Re:Your Soul Moves On When The Body Dies by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      I think that actually you've brought up a good point (whether you meant to or not!). What is death really? The definition has changed over time. Given "near-death" experiences, I think a generally acceptable definition would be "the irreversible cessation of life functions". By this definition, if you're stored at the point of clinical death, and later can be repaired and brought back then I suppose you were never truly dead in the first place.

      It seems to me that the important thing is the pattern- what makes you uniquely you. If ischemia can be sufficiently mitigated to allow you to be restored then no harm, no foul, no worrying about an ephemeral "soul" moving on to another line of work. :-)

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  52. Apparently.. by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Richard Nixon has expressed interest in the procedure. It's his first step towards becoming the President of Earth.

  53. Credit card bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet the only ones getting any money from that are the credit card companies. Imagine: you die, but you have a $100 balance on your Visa. And of course you cannot send just pay them: you're dead!
    With interest rates of 25%-35% and late fees all your puny $10 or $100 million dollars will be gone the moment you wake up...

  54. Khaaaaaannnnnn!!!!!! by Albinoman · · Score: 1

    I at least want to wait until I know they can give me crazy improvments to my genome. Imagine it, combine it with some nanotechnology and for a large sum of they might be able to freeze you and enhance your genome for a set of tissue, so long as you dont mess with anything reproductive.

  55. It's a basic human drive. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

    What the hell. If self-preservation has now become politically incorrect, our society has officially lost all touch with its evolutionary roots.

    But any society or subset thereof that does survive the centuries will not be in such hopeless denial about its nature, and they will understand the point of view of a person who wants to do everything he or she can to survive and witness the future for themselves.

    1. Re:It's a basic human drive. by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      >What the hell. If self-preservation has now become politically incorrect, our society has officially lost all touch with its evolutionary roots.

      You dont have children do you? Self preservation is only a small part of evolution. Once you done your duty and raised your kids youre excess baggage whos only function is to annoy your offspring and their offspring and take them fishing once in a while.

      Society, especially a more advanced future one, has no interest in reviving rich dead people who will undoubtedly go on and on about how much better it was in the old days. What could JP Morgan possibly offer us today? What good would come of a society of eternal old people? Evolution is about CHANGE and people dont change. Have fun, have kids and get the fuck out of the way.

    2. Re:It's a basic human drive. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Self preservation is only a small part of evolution. Once you done your duty and raised your kids youre excess baggage whos only function is to annoy your offspring and their offspring and take them fishing once in a while.


      I might choose to have kids, if during my lifetime the overpopulation conditions improve. You're mistaken about being excess baggage after having raised kids. You're an evolutionary player for as long as you're capable of having more kids if you want to be technical about it. This is why species with low risk of predation evolve such long lifespans (e.g. humans, tortoises, birds, bats). Furthermore, waking up in the future and having a few more kids would be a great way to insure your bloodline.

      With the emergence of civilization, evolutionary pressures continue, but they have become far more complicated, and memetic/cultural evolution has been added to the mix. It may boil down to something like "greatest control over their own and their progeny's survival strategies given to those who are the most useful to society".

      But anyway, you're committing the naturalistic fallacy. Just because evolution may favor a particular outcome, doesn't mean that we as individuals would or should want that outcome. The people who believe the universe has an inherent prescriptive morality generally don't believe in evolution in the first place... they tend to believe the creation story of whatever religion they belong to.


      Society, especially a more advanced future one, has no interest in reviving rich dead people who will undoubtedly go on and on about how much better it was in the old days.


      Wow, you seem to have a lot of inside information about what an advanced society is interested in. Tell you what, share your time-machine secret with me and I'll give up my cryo contract.


      What could JP Morgan possibly offer us today? What good would come of a society of eternal old people? Evolution is about CHANGE and people dont change.

      Heck, if I had the cash and the technology, and he was frozen, I'd revive his ass. By watching someone experience something for the first time, we all learn something new, whether it's JP Morgan or some nameless schmoe.

      A sufficiently old individual is a source of genetic diversity, because just as new genes arise through mutation, old ones can be lost, sometimes due to selective pressures that no longer apply or have been reversed. For example, who knows how many alleles predisposing for intelligence might have gotten lost because they had a pleiotropic effect on neonatal immune function.

      Have fun, have kids and get the fuck out of the way.


      No.
      Except for the have fun part.

  56. Futurerama Reference by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    ...or, he could let his savings accumulate for 1000 years and then spend it on a single anchovy.

  57. Re:So... Even if we do get enough advances medical by tempehop · · Score: 1

    Because wanting to keep the selfish and materialistic out of society despite the fact that you can help them is altruistic?

  58. Re:A disturbing path (ooookayyy...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm not that blind.


    Maybe not, but evidently you're that insane.


    Wow man. Just... Wow.

  59. what about inflation? by MOGua · · Score: 1

    he could wake up in 100 years the richest man in the world.

    but in 100 years, a can of coke might cost a thousand bucks.

    then he would be the poorest frozen dude ever!

  60. Screw that. by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

    I'm not gonna risk trusting medical advances that will likely be overtaken by herbal remedies and holistic healing to bring me back from the dead, or trusting the law not to change to count corpsicles as dead people. Why not just do http://science.slashdot.org/science/05/06/27/19232 59.shtml?tid=191&tid=14 when the medical bills start pileing up? They'll probably at least have a cancer killer and cybernetic replacements for everything short of the prefrontal lobe alot sooner than a reanimator. Sure, the inflated money might not pay all of your medical bills, but it's a better shot than we have now. And once you are a brain in a mech your living expenses will be a little lower (cause you'll only need a little nutrient paste to feed your brain and some nuclear fuel rods!). I can't wait, sign me up now. I hate my pathetic malnourished pale skinny short weak and fragile body - I wanna look like the mecha in the Armored Core games. That'll kick ass.

    --
    The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    1. Re:Screw that. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if this is a troll, or joke, or what.

      But herbal remedies?! Are you shitting me? Dude, I'm a biology geek, and I can tell you that the field is littered with herbal supplements that don't make a damn bit of difference in controlled trials. A few do make a difference and are worth all the effort. But there's nothing "magic" in the world of herbal remedies that the big bad medical establishment it trying to hide from you.

      If there was, don't you think various pre-technological peoples would have already cured cancer and heart disease long before modern medicine was a twinkle in Galen's eye?

      Oh, wait, they have and the big bad medical establishment covered it up. After they staged the moon landing and replaced Kennedy's corpse with Elvis'.

    2. Re:Screw that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the best part of his post was where he was talking about herbal remedies bringing people back from the dead. Because we all know about how you have to clear certain types of plant off graveyards to stop them from filling up with zombies.

    3. Re:Screw that. by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      "On the Internet, no one can hear you being subtle" - Linus Torvalds (I think it goes like that). Dude. Sarcasm. Sorry if it wasn't too clear, but seriously. Herbal remedies? Come on, I was making fun of the prevalence of them and society's continual belief that science is just another form of "magic" on equal terms with snake oil. I think herbal remedies should be given a scientific trial on the off chance one is useful, but I wouldn't go and become a breatharian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breatharian anytime soon. Come on, this is /., what the hell would some newage (rhymes with sewage) freak be doing here? Is my sig not geeky enough?

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    4. Re:Screw that. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Whoops, sorry. I must have lapsed into my humourless cryonically correct mode.

  61. After all of our land is gone... by ValiantSoul · · Score: 1

    So what happens when the entire Earth is taken up by greedy dead people's land? Seriously this should not be legal it just takes up unused land. Also - as someone previously mentioned - tax evation. And he wants to do it so he can be the richest man on Earth?! What ever happened to enjoying life with your loving family and dying a peaceful death to go to Heaven? Mr. Pizer doesn't sound like he would be a /.er so I'm sure he has a family - especially if he has money with all of the money hungry women.

    I hope he is married and when he dies his wife takes him to court (because if he can be considered alive later why not sue him in the mean time) and takes all of his money that she deserved via his will.

  62. Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watching all of the purported "nerds" in this thread trying to grapple with middle school level economics as if it were a greased boar.

  63. ...and so say all of us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freeze a jolly good fellow,
    Freeze a jolly good fellow,
    Freeze a jolly good fellow,
    And so say all of us!!

  64. On A Serious Note by herriojr · · Score: 1

    Since there is no longer any brain activity after death, there seems to be a problem. If the brain is anything like a Turing Machine, the majority of who the person is can be the software portion (the signals, not the goo that is your brain). I myself don't think that the hardware portion (physical) of the brain is who the person is or has the momories hardwired. He would lose all his memories, history, and everything. It would be like being born into the body of a old person (assuming it's not just his brain that's being frozen). Basically, it would be the same as if he just handed the money off to some stranger.

    I'm not an expert on this of course, although I'd love to do related research in grad school. It's quite interesting.

  65. id rather by digitallysick · · Score: 0

    Be frozen and put in some type of casing and shot into space!!! take some things with me.

  66. Buried Treasure. by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    Assuming for the minute that this will ever work (which currently is likely a crock of shit), why not just buy a bunch of gold, and bury it some random place in the ocean that you've memorized the GPS co-ordinates for? Gold is unlikely to decrease in value very much, so it should hold its value over a few hundred years. If you could somehow do this yourself (anyone you pay to help will likely just come back the next month of after you're dead and take the gold), it seems fairly foolproof.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Buried Treasure. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's actually a good idea. I can't think of anything wrong with it. This could make a damn good sci-fi story.

      And because of you, someday when I'm old and cancer-ridden, I'll buy myself a yacht. ;-)

    2. Re:Buried Treasure. by Alderin1 · · Score: 1

      Great plan...

      Until they change the GPS coordinate system.

      --
      No conformist ever made history.
    3. Re:Buried Treasure. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I thought Gold was constantly losing it's value as they keep digging more of it up but regardless of whether or not that is the case it's far more sensible to keep your wealth tied up in as many diverse things as you can and the best way of doing that is to leave it in a bank or some sort of investment fund.

    4. Re:Buried Treasure. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      I was going to write the same thing about coordinate systems changing, but then I realized it doesn't matter. The Earth will still have the same geometry, and it should be possible to convert the current coordinates into whatever coordinates are being used at the time, though I don't see why anybody would bother changing the system-- it's the same longitude and latitutde that served us for centuries. The thing to worry about is geologic drift, so some backup landmarks would be useful. Also, it might be useful to split the stash up between multiple locations-- that anonymous spot on the continental shelf might be in the middle of a mine someday. Or a shopping center.

      As for gold, it might be useful to think about what other small items might retain high value. May even be ordinary things like stamps, newly minted coins, heirloom seeds... but then we're making assumptions about what society will value in the future.

    5. Re:Buried Treasure. by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      it's far more sensible to keep your wealth tied up in as many diverse things as you can and the best way of doing that is to leave it in a bank or some sort of investment fund.

      Dead people can't (and shouldn't be able to) own things. This isn't going to change anytime soon, primarily because dead people also can't vote. The value of gold does flutuate, but it's about the only thing that holds its value over millenia because it's rare.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:Buried Treasure. by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      The thing to worry about is geologic drift, so some backup landmarks would be useful.

      The continents move on the order of a few centimeters per year. Even if you were frozen for 1000 years (kind of absurd even for the far out idea of cryogenics) that's only 30 meters. They also don't move randomly, so you'd even be able to correct for this small shift.

      As for gold, it might be useful to think about what other small items might retain high value. May even be ordinary things like stamps, newly minted coins, heirloom seeds

      Gold is rare, and always will be rare. It's the most likely thing to retain value over the short and long term. It'd probbably be wise to diversify into some precious metals like platinum and silver. Stamps and coins would be a gamble.

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:Buried Treasure. by alw53 · · Score: 1

      Dead people vote all the time in Chicago. Also, once people have the technology to analyze you down to the molecular level and rebuild you, what's to stop them from simply reading the GPS coords out of your image dump and then throwing away the image dump without re-instantiating it?

  67. Down The Road by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    Soon after he dies, his estate will reorganize and decide that meetings must take place in the south of France, and other exotic locations. 20 or so years from now, the money will run out, the body will be thawed and put in the ground.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  68. How does this help if you die of old age? by Garwulf · · Score: 1

    Okay - I can see where this is helpful if you're 35 years old and dying of incurable cancer. You just get frozen until they can cure it. No problem.

    But, um, what happens if you die at the age of 95 of old age? In all seriousness, what is the point of being frozen if that happens? If it works and you're revived, doesn't this just mean that now you get to live in the nursing home of the future for another couple of years before you die again?

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
    1. Re:How does this help if you die of old age? by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      But, um, what happens if you die at the age of 95 of old age?


      That's why people like me are devoting our lives to studying biogerontology.
    2. Re:How does this help if you die of old age? by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Um, no. If you have the technology to do cellular repair on a molecular level (which is likely a prerequisite to reviving cryonics patients) then old age will be trivial to repair by comparison.

      To be clear, when medical technology advances to the point where recovering cryonauts is an issue, the world will have already moved to a place where "natural causes" will have ceased to be a valid cause of death.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  69. Don't Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's spending a year dead for tax reasons.

  70. I think about that a lot. Re:decisions by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, euthenasia being legalized in the US (or at least in Arizona) would make cryonics more reliable.

    On the other hand, it would be a coup for the people I think of as the "pro-death lobby". It would set the expectation that instead of wanting to live, old people should politely step aside and take a lethal dose of sleeping pills to avoid inconveniencing the younger generations.

    So I guess it's not so much the legality of euthenasia I'm concerned about as the cultural expectations it might create.

    1. Re:I think about that a lot. Re:decisions by typical · · Score: 1

      Euthanasia was legal for most of human history in most of the world, but this fact didn't seem to result in mass suicides of the population.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    2. Re:I think about that a lot. Re:decisions by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      They also didn't have such a huge proportion of their population be retired people.

      But honestly, I don't think this will be abused much. We just need to be vigilant. Get all those pro-lifers urging old people to stay around a little longer and give pain medication a chance to relieve their suffering. Oh, but who am I kidding? Old people are nowhere as cute and innocent as fetuses.

  71. Re:A disturbing path by Onuma · · Score: 1

    I just firmly believe that if its your time to die, you're going to die regardless. Sure, we may have the technology to fix 'er up one day, but would you really want to get dunked in liquid nitrogen only to wake up many years later in the same old decrepit body suffering of the same arthritis and whatnot? They would have to find cures for all of your ailments and old age, or they would need to clone you or place your memories and consciousness into a host body (be it organic or otherwise). Creepy.

    I'll take my chances with dying naturally.
    And if cryonics ever becomes a real problem, I'm sure there will be fanatics and anti-corpsiclists (new word) to mob in and torch the homosapien iceboxes.

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  72. Re:huh? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    offtopic my ass, this story is off topic. it belongs in science, maybe even politics definitely not YRO

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  73. you talk about something you know nothing about by Cryofan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as a signed up Alcor member, please allow me to disabuse you of some of your mistaken ideas:

    1. "all that money": Alcor is the best cryonics organization in the world. And there are only two...
    But Alcor is a nonprofit, and no one working there makes much money at all. In fact, almost everyone working there is either poor or independently wealthy.

    Also Alcor does not take in enough money to even cover its expenses. Most members are middle class, but some can afford to donate large sums, which is how Alcor stays solvent.

    2. Cryonics, for cryonicists, ties into the hardwired religious-epiphany-ectascy circuitry in our brains. You know that many people (most?) get a rush from religion? Well, that same religious feeling is what makes cryonics tick. It gives us an "out" just as does religion. Except of course our "out" is something that depends on real world physics and human nature.

    So, cryonicists who work at cryonics organizations are sort of like monks.They do it for the love of cryoncis, and in the hope that if they can build up cryonics enough so that society accepts it and we get a lot more members, we can make it a self sufficient enterprise.

    So if cryonicists working at Alcor do something bad, they screw up their own chances to be revived in the future.

    Do you now understand one of the major strengths of cryonics?

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:you talk about something you know nothing about by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Also Alcor does not take in enough money to even cover its expenses. Most members are middle class, but some can afford to donate large sums, which is how Alcor stays solvent.

      So they can't cover their expenses well? So what is there to assure a person that Alcor will still be around in even 100 years? What happens to the corpsicles if they go bankrupt?

      Well, that same religious feeling is what makes cryonics tick.

      I can understand that, at least understand that to one who does not understand faith would think that. Faith and religion is something much deeper. I, and others I know who are quite rational, have seen things that cannot always be explained by science. You've given the basic non-believer view of religion and/or spirituality. In your words, you talk about something you know nothing about. I've given up on trying to explain any matters of faith or religion or spirituality to a non-believer. Trying to explain faith to one who puts it in such logical, scientific terms is like trying to explain color to a blind man, or sex to a virgin. Sure, you can say, "You do this and this, and it feels good and the man does this and the woman does this," but there is no way you can describe the actual emotional connection with another person to someone who has never experienced it. That only comes to those willing to love and get close to someone and to take that "leap of faith."

      So, please, don't criticize others for speaking in ignorance when you are doing the same thing.

    2. Re:you talk about something you know nothing about by pugnatious · · Score: 1

      Heh, thanks, but I think I'll try my luck with scientology. They seem like a decent bunch in comparison.

    3. Re:you talk about something you know nothing about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all well and good, but please don't be so quick as to discount the opinion of those who have faithfully believed and later come to a different conclusion about their experiences.

    4. Re:you talk about something you know nothing about by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not. I had very deep faith and gave it up for Lent one year. I spent years as an athiest, then felt called in another direction. I've seen both sides of the fence. I've also learned that those who don't believe have never really felt that extra connection that is true faith -- if a person has felt it, they know. If not, well, then, they just might drop faith and turn 100% scientific.

      That's something someone who thinks they believe, or has learned to act like the believe, or who takes a religious text literally and doesn't question it -- then one day learns something they never expected, can do, but someone who has had a true faith connection is not someone who can drop it and say that only the logical exists. And that is also one of those things that those who don't have it just don't get -- again, like trying to explain the bond you get having sex with someone you love to a virgin who hasn't even dated someone regularly.

  74. What good? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Maybe not, but the OP has a point: if and when you wake up, will it do you much good to wake up a) broke, and b) without a marketable skill? You'll be about as useful to the new society as a buggy driver is to ours.

    I'd rather be living on the street 500 years hence than ever haven gotten the chance to see a world wholly different from my own. That would be worth a lot of personal discomfort.

    As another poster said, it's a bit like really cheap time travel - if it works.

    I wouldn't even necessarily get a cryo contract just for terminal illness kinds of situations - it would be cool to go under around 90 and then wake up many decades hence. Kind of like skipping to the end of a book to see how it all turns out.

    I don't have a cryo contract myself but if the certainly of being de-thawed ever approached some decent probability I could see going for it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  75. He will just buy... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    All he will do is use the money to buy the last can of anchovies...

  76. Alimony by knapper_tech · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Some woman is going to find a way to marry this guy while he's under and bleed him dry...unless of course there's a constitutional ammendment defining marriage as between a fully animate man and a fully animate woman.

    --
    "There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." ~ Louis Armstrong
  77. ... unlike a poor thaw ... by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

    when he could say "broohroohroohoo! my assets are frozen!"

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
  78. Re:A disturbing path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You assume the person dying is dying of complications related to old age.

    Assume instead it's a heart failure where the slashdot story http://science.slashdot.org/science/06/01/22/21262 14.shtml could come into play about repairing the heart.

    Lots of people of various age have heart-related problems. I can see parents wanting their kids to have a chance at life instead of dying at an age of 5 or so.

  79. You are thinking of memory like RAM by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Why might not memory be more like hard drive storage, lasting some significant duration after actual computation stops? Just because a program is stored on disc and not used for some time it does not just stop working.

    It would be interesting to see research on this if they can ever successfully reassly place someone in suspended animation for a long period of time.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You are thinking of memory like RAM by fbartho · · Score: 1

      shit man, very unethical, but very interesting... seriously though there is no proof that the brain is like ram, there are clearly connections that are created between your neurons as you learn things. If the brain were to be frozen intact with every single electrical connections forgotten, if you were thawed, and the initial electrical signals restarted, doesn't it stand to reason that you would wake up with your immediate short term memory forgotten, everything that has not made an indelible impression on your brain? You would also have all of the chemical reactions interrupted, but as long as your brain was frozen fast enough they would restart where they were... that's the bonus of chemical reactions. You would only lose any actions your brain was in the process of deciding to do...

      --
      Gravity Sucks
  80. Great business plan by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Watching over money that will never be claimed, and getting paid an extra fee to do it, has to be the greatest get rich scheme ever.

  81. Economic illiteracy on display by ccmay · · Score: 1
    If it's been put into a mutual fund, it's staying in that mutual fund. It's not being spent on anything.

    Good grief. Is this what passes for economic wisdom on Slashdot nowadays?

    I suppose you think a mutual fund is some kind of giant bank vault full of greenbacks, like the place where Scrooge McDuck hoarded and fondled his stacks of cash.

    It doesn't work that way at all. If you buy a share of stock, you either buy it from someone who already owns it, or you buy it directly from the company. In the first case, the prior owner takes the cash you gave him and spends it as he sees fit. In the second case, the company takes the cash and spends it as they see fit. In either case, the money circulates just as if you had bought some tangible good from the other party.

    Your stock certificate is basically an IOU, good for some defined fraction of a company's value. You have to forgo the opportunity to spend the cash on something else yourself, and you hope it goes up in value due to future profits, but in the end you are most certainly putting your own real money in circulation.

    A mutual fund just adds one more middleman to the transaction, but reduces some of the risk and volatility from owning individual stocks. The circulation is the same.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
    1. Re:Economic illiteracy on display by Bongo+Bill · · Score: 1
      Well, now I know.

      I was trying to simplify it for the grandparent poster, and I guess I did it wrong.

      --
      ...but is it art?
  82. Re:Or..... short story by saskboy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I read a short story in Grade 7 English, about 3 people who cryogenically froze themselves to be revived later. One wanted to be rich, but found out inflation had made him very poor. One later was revived looking to be cured of his ailment. They had cured him, but when he coughed from the cold air, they "sterilized" him because he might have the cold virus they'd wiped out by exterminating the sick. The third was looking for a way to get out of jail-time, and when he awoke, society was no different from the prison he came out of.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  83. What if . . . . by JorgeDeLaCancha · · Score: 1

    And if we never figure out to successfully "unfreeze" these people . . . who gets the money then?

    1. Re:What if . . . . by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Actually, as long as there's no disaster that will wipe out Alcor and similar organizations, even if we never figure out a way to unfreeze people, a sufficiently advanced nanomedicine will eventually figure out how to reconstruct exact copies of frozen people down to the molecular level.

      Not that I'm philosophically satisfied with such a revival. When I get around to it, I will stipulate in my will that I don't wish any destructive copies to be made of the original until "real" revival becomes possible unless the only alternative is the original getting destroyed anyway.

  84. History repeats itself by qasimzaidi · · Score: 1

    How is this different from Egyptian Pharao's who would like to be mummified and buried with all there treasures, so that they can come back with all there wealth still around.


    History does repeats itself, in so very funny ways.
    1. Re:History repeats itself by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's different because it might really work.

    2. Re:History repeats itself by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      They probably won't remove his brain and replace it with resin.

    3. Re:History repeats itself by ultranova · · Score: 1

      How is this different from Egyptian Pharao's who would like to be mummified and buried with all there treasures, so that they can come back with all there wealth still around.

      Well, in two ways.

      The first way is that the Egyptians didn't intend to come back. They thought that preserving the body would give you a safe passage to the afterlife, and surrounding it with riches would allow you to take their "spirits" with you. The pyramids, for example, include a "soul chute" (in addition to normal passageways) that the pharaoh was supposed to use when leaving his earthly remains. Or so I think anyway; I'm not ancient egyptian, so I might be wrong ;).

      The second is that mummification worked: it preserved bodies for millenias, far beyond the collapse of egyptian civilization. Frozen bodies, on the other hand, require the constant attention of caretakers, and won't survive any serious disruption of civilization or the organization that maintains them.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:History repeats itself by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      The Egyptians thought the same thing.

  85. Clone of My Own by uberdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, give me a clone
    Of my own flesh and bone
    With its Y-chromosome changed to X
    And when it is grown
    Then my own little clone
    Will be of the opposite sex.

    (Chorus)
    Clone, clone of my own,
    With your Y-Chromosome changed to X
    And when I'm alone
    With my own little clone
    We will both think of nothing but sex.

    Asimov and Garrett

    1. Re:Clone of My Own by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me, but I really would NOT be interested in a balding chick with a 5-o'clock shadow and a beer belly.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Clone of My Own by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      if you were a chick, you probably would not be bald OR have a beer belly

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  86. Anchovies? by dagnabit · · Score: 1

    But when he wakes up, will he squander all the money on a can of anchovies?

  87. Tax be damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's saving up for a tin of anchovies.

  88. Re:You forget the nano/biotech revolution comming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe I'm getting a lecture about how stupid I am from someone who can't spell "Commodore". O brave new world that has such people in it.

  89. An unending cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So a guy puts money aside and freezes himself. Assuming everything goes as planned, he wakes up in aboud 100 years and has a lot of money. He then spends most of that money making sure if he dies again, he would be frozen again. With the mostly greedy type of people doing this, they will spend all their life trying to live longer. Some where along the line, a simple mistake will occur and the person dies. What a waste of resources.

  90. Awesome to the max! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me Pfizer was quoted as saying "My only regret is ... that I have bone-itis!"

  91. Shouldn't he be frozen while still alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I thought it was pretty much impossible to revive a body post death, and it seems much more likely for reanimation if the person were frozen while still alive.

    1. Re:Shouldn't he be frozen while still alive? by Upsilon+Andromedea · · Score: 1

      Correct. Regardless of what the cryonaut dies of, society would need a cure for death to have an opportunity to cure the original illness.

      One should get frozen while alive despite the possible discomfort of the experience.

      Even better, while one still has some youth. Why arrive in a more idealistically healthy society as aged person with blurry vision, bad hearing and week muscles etc.? Why hope for a cure when, for the lesser barrier of being thawed out uninjured, one could arrive healthy in a society that can keep one that way indefinitely?

      So what if freezing alive is illegal? What are they going to do, unfreeze the cryonaut? That would be capital punishment without a trial. The cryonaut sets up the accounts and has anonymous assistants administer the process and deposit him at one of the cryogenic organizations.

      --
      freeman
    2. Re:Shouldn't he be frozen while still alive? by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Since most of us can't afford to go offshore to perform such shenanigans, we have to rely on the infrastructure of organizations like Alcor and Cryonics Institute. Both these places are located in the US (in Alcor's case the UK as well), and scrupulously abide by all applicable laws because they know that just by existing they're already a huge target for greedy heirs, fear-mongering politicians, and self-appointed ethicists.

      If a cryo company froze a living subject, they would be put on trial and probably liquidated and all the cryosuspended people would be thawed and buried. No legal precedent yet exists for a frozen person being considered potentially alive, so the execution without trial argument would not hold up. IANAL but as far as I can tell, the legal status of such a person would be the same as that of one who fell into a vat of liquid N2 accidentally-- dead.

      If euthenasia is ever legalized, it might be possible to get suspended while alive, but even then I suspect that cryo companies would be very, very cautious about the circumstances under which this would be done.

    3. Re:Shouldn't he be frozen while still alive? by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Well put, sir. That's exactly the argument I was going to make, though you worded it much more lucidly than I likely would have.

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  92. Very Optimistic by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    I'd say this guy is a tad bit optimistic of what will happen to him when the technology comes around to unthaw and reanimate him. Initially the technology will have flaws I'm sure and guess who will get to be the guinea pig? Or he could end up some awful frankenstein creation because some crooked drug corporation says its in the best interests of humanity to carry out certain experiments. Pretty scary I'd say. Or maybe they'll want to subject him to all kinds of research into age old diseases or genetic makeup. Who's going to care about the rights of some 200 year old frozen corpse? If he thinks he'll get a fair shake at a fresh start, that just makes me laugh I'm sorry to say.

    1. Re:Very Optimistic by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      What better non-metaphysical alternatives are you proposing?

  93. Why? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    Why would they? This scheme is basically substituting banks for government and legitimate heirs.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  94. The Future!!! by eonlabs · · Score: 1

    Yup, sounds like the futures going to be awesome
    Giant Robots, Flying Cars, Cures to all diseases
    But the only question I really have is...
    ...
    ...
    What are we going to do with all the mansicles?

    Oooooh, This one's Dumbass Flavored ^_^

    --
    I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
  95. He won't get any money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that will happen is that Mom and her three sons will somehow use Pamela Andersen's head to get his PIN number, and withdraw all his cash. Then he'll have to be a delivery boy.

  96. Overpopulation? by NMZNMZNMZ · · Score: 1

    If everyone follows his plan, I guess we'll have to find a "cure" to overpopulation damn quick.

  97. might not work so well by elmuhfuh · · Score: 0

    $10 million is worth me telling my grandkids about this story so they can steal his frozen corpse, burn it, and say they are him mysteriously ressurected only to squander away the $10 million on 150 years of back issues of nintendo power.

  98. Should just leave it for the tooth fairy.. by guzzirider · · Score: 1

    If he has any family at all they (and the attorneys representing them) will get it all.

  99. Tax Em by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You heard me... Tax the icicles.

    1. Re:Tax Em by ElectroBot · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. If they want to keep the stuff until they get revived (if we revive them), they should have to pay yearly taxes on their possesions (payable by the person/entity charged with taking care of their estate/stuff).


      For your laptop:

      Solution 1 - It has a PCMCIA slot - try borrowing/buying a PCMCIA ethernet adapter (they're as cheap as $15 with ship on ebay
      Solution 2 - Use the floppy drive
      Solution 3 - Burn a cd with the drivers or a cd with drivers and installation software for the os
      Solution 4 - Download knoppix (or a "lite"r live-cd version of linux) and copy the driver to the hd that way
      Solution 5 - Copy the drivers in Windows and access the FAT32 Windows partition from Linux (CAREFUL - might damage your windows partition)
      Solution 6 - Remove the laptop's hd and use a 2.5" external usb enclosure to copy the files
      Solution 7 - Get someone else to do it for free/money

  100. Disaster Area (HGttG) by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

    I just wish these guys would admit they got the idea from Hotblack Desiato.

  101. Re:Instant-- HELL by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Well, it might be instant from OUR or YOUR forecasting perspective, but imagine having and reliving a series of nightmares for that duration of years. I don't know about YOU, but I regularly "re-dream" dreams I've had from years back. I guess it could be a type of "dream sequencing", but fortunately for me, they're not horrors.

    As for Pizer and the like, they might actually go gray and writhe in sleep. If being monitored, they might be pulled out of cryostatis to be "checked on". Plans might be disrupted.

    Worse, he might decide to live out his final ill years or days (or -- if they botch the "wakeup procedure", minutes) rather than suffer repeat horrors.

    Or, even worse, he might wake up into a quagmire of re-written laws which deprive him of his earnings or accumulations whereas if he's never awakened, he could be "perpetually grandfathered".

    Maybe there could be a "reseeding" clause in the insurance policy so that every 25 years he's siphoned of some of his "jewell material" for procreation purposes. Might help him have some "external immortality" to accompany him on his sleeping journey.

    But, in the meantime, it's likely he'll awaken to find his ass robbed as a form of "Sleeping Booty" (pun intended). If he's frozen over some blindness, then I guess sleeping booty would be "robbed blind"...

    word image: tentacle (and, I was thinking "testicle"... Well, I guess to see if he's really asleep, they can give him a "test tickle", hehehe)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  102. understanding future language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I think the chance of this working is vanishingly remote for a whole bunch of reasons.

    But that aside, has anyone considered that anyone reanimated by a future civilization likely will not understand human languages of the day? Unless you die pretty young, your chance of ever becoming fluent will be small. Old people don't do well learning new languages.

  103. Why do people always look at the down side? by drivekiller · · Score: 1

    I think it's wonderful they're going to such pains to preserve themselvers for future intelligent beings to dig up and wonder about.

  104. His money was in trust by 246o1 · · Score: 1

    It's been about a decade since I read it, but I think there was a trust of his, and the managers invested reasonably well, and it eventually gained a majority of the world's wealth. Again, been a long time, so I don't want to swear on too many details.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
  105. When he wakes up.. by n6kuy · · Score: 1

    He'll have to spend it all for a drink of water and a ride into town.

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  106. Wealthy crybabies by davidsyes · · Score: 0

    When they wake up to find themselves thawed broke.

    I wonder if Uma Thawman would perform in a "Chill Bill" film...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  107. Re:A disturbing path by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    Lookit man (woman/whatever), the only unnatural or incorrect thing about abortion is that we don't wait till they're born and then eat them as so many other species due in the natural course of life.

    Yeeesh, seriously, get over it. It's not like anyone state institution iss forcing or even coercing you to getting pregnant and then aborting.

    Incidentally, the pro-abortion lobby consists of 3 people who like pointing out the idiocy. There are actually only two choices in this arena. Pro-choice (Better defined as pro-availability) and anti-choice (best described as mysogynistic anti-availability fundie nutbags).

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  108. There are two things certain... by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess if you plan on skipping out on one of life's certainty's, you may as well plan on skipping the other!

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  109. the ultimate question by marafa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    important quotes
    leave money to himself when he DIES ....
    when he REVIVES...

    guess they will answer the question of:
    is there life after death?

    wonder if this will also work if his head is smashed in

    enuf jibberish.

    --
    _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
  110. Legal ruling? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    How dare the courts ever render a legal ruling that this would be "Tax Evasion". To permit such a ruling to exist would set a "chilling effect", in effect, effecting a Tax INvasion. SO, maybe he better freeze his cash with him, and pray the currency is still legal tender.

    In the mean time, if he sits too long, he might literally "freeze his ass off".

    Now, if this system were from Scandanavia, (Skinned an Avian, for the birds) or "Iceland... hmmm, Ice Lan-*ick Preservations", (for men of large repute)... I guess females could have "Extrauterine Preservations" Oh. It's LATE...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  111. might not do him any good by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    With a brain like that, he'd wind up blowing all that money on the last can of anchovies in the world.

  112. Re:A disturbing path (ooookayyy...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I have what non-liberal doctors will no doubt recognise some day as a heightened state of awareness"


    Nope, checked your account profile just now, looked at your post history, and you're deefinatly crazy. I mean, I'm pro-life myself, but I know a wackjob when I see one.

  113. I'd do it anyway, if I thought it would work by Mathinker · · Score: 1
    Despite all the humorous and not-so-humorous scenarios posted of waking up in the future in a less than ideal situation, as long as I would be able to communicate and absorb information enough to be able to try to understand what things are like when I wake up, my ferocious curiosity would make me try it.

    Except for the fact that I think the probability of success is so small as to make it not worthwhile.

  114. This is Nothing New by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the Pharohs were placed in their reincarnation devices (The pyramids) they tried to take it all with them, too. I expect the results will be similar for the modern day people who are trying to cheat death. I don't believe that our current level of technology can preserve a body well enough to fix it at some future date and I don't believe that the current infrastructure is reliable enough to keep a body frozen for 100 years much less several. In fact, I doubt the current bunch of frozen dead guys will hold up as long as the Egyptians who were mummified thousands of years ago. My money's on them all quietly ending up in some medical waste bin somewhere within 40-50 years time.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  115. GET OVER YOURSELF! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nobody lives forever... nobody SHOULD live forever... and if thats wrong and there is some rare person who actually deserves to live forever, it's certainly not YOU. Having accumulated weath doesn't make you deserving - if anything, it probably rules you out.

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:GET OVER YOURSELF! by justins · · Score: 1

      My subjective value judgement is better than YOURS. I'm going to put some of it in CAPS. TAKE THAT.

      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    2. Re:GET OVER YOURSELF! by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Nobody lives forever... nobody SHOULD live forever...

      So you want 6-10 billion people to die even if we eventually found the technology to save every last one of them from death?

      It is one thing to accept death as one fate, but to say people should get over it and die is like walking into a cancer ward and telling people they shouldn't waste their time with chemotherapy because it is a waste of resources.

      And as always when we get into this argument about death we have to pull out the fable of the Dragon which explains in many terms why death is unnecessary.

      http://www.nickbostrom.com/fable/dragon.html

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:GET OVER YOURSELF! by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      So you want 6-10 billion people to die even if we eventually found the technology to save every last one of them from death?

      No. What he's saying is that, when someone dies, they're dead. If you're lying in a hospital bed dying, I hope they do everything possible to save your life. But when you die, well, you're dead. And I happen to think it should stay that way.

      (It frightens me to think that, some day, this view might make me a conservative?)

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    4. Re:GET OVER YOURSELF! by vertinox · · Score: 1

      But when you die, well, you're dead. And I happen to think it should stay that way.

      If someone drowns and you just yanked their body out of the water. They aren't breathing anymore... They don't have a pulse. They are clinically dead.

      Do you want to give them CPR and mouth to mouth, or are they already dead and we shouldn't try?

      If you don't at least try, then is your inaction tantamount of killing them?

      It shouldn't matter if they have been dead 1 minute or 1,000 years. If you have the ability, then you should at least attempt to save them. There is no difference between the two.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:GET OVER YOURSELF! by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious -- What made you the ultimate authority on right and wrong, because that's a great position in life. Hey, is it wrong to fart in an elevator even when you are by yourself? I've had that question burning in my mind for awhile, and if you could answer that, I would be most appreciative.

      --
      I'm a minister!
    6. Re:GET OVER YOURSELF! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      I concur. If death is the irreversible cessation of life functions and you can be revived, even if it requires exotic means and advanced nanotechnology, then you were never really "dead" in the first place- just really really bad off.

      It's stunning to me how few people seem to grasp this relatively simple concept.

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  116. That's a US problem - find other jurisdictions by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Sure, there may be places where you can't create that sort of trust. So go find another country where the banking laws are more flexible, whether that's Switzerland or the Caymans or whatever. Better yet, find two or three, and put part of your money in each, in case one of your banks either fails, invest badly, gets nationalized, or rips you off. But if you've got heirs, make sure they get at least half your cash so they don't fight it.

    Or you can go create a corporation to do some of your holdings for you, if you've got enough money - buy a large ranch and turn it into a nature reserve with a deal that you can get it back if you get revived.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:That's a US problem - find other jurisdictions by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      There is actually a trust already set up in Liechtenstein for precisely this purpose, as there are no perpetuity laws there.

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  117. Suing the estates of the dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We worked that out in the courts ages ago. The dead can't own property. It's not fair to the heirs."
    Paraphrase from "A World Out of Time", by Larry Niven

    1. Re:Suing the estates of the dead by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Paraphrase from "A World Out of Time", by Larry Niven
      That's the one I was thinking of.
  118. 2000AD by mulhall · · Score: 1

    It was a short story in Future Shock, IIRC.

  119. Actually I did not read it here first by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

    I read it in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy first :)

    But good reference.

  120. What about organ harvesting by jhoger · · Score: 1

    What I got from Niven was that transplant tech gets MUCH better, and Congress passes a law allowing harvesting of organs from the human corpsicles. People go along because they see those that freeze themselves waiting for a better future as freeloaders, and heck it's more important for me to live forever than somebody else, especially a corpsicle. Then of course comes harvesting organs from prisoners and changing the law to increase the prison population until finally artificial organ farms catch up and solve the problem.

    Why hasn't anyway made a Gil "The Arm" Hamilton movie yet...

    -- John.

  121. My fear is by jhoger · · Score: 1

    My cryonightmare is that they will wake me up in 500 years and I will find that all of the bugs in the software I maintain (still in use, mind you) are still frozen in time exactly as I left them. And of course, since I touched the code last and no one understands these archaic languages C and VB6 (or these ancient english comments) rather than getting to enjoy the benefits of our advanced civilization where no one works I will spend the rest of my life fixing bugs since they spent all that money to wake me up to fix them...

    1. Re:My fear is by ultranova · · Score: 1

      My cryonightmare is that they will wake me up in 500 years and I will find that all of the bugs in the software I maintain (still in use, mind you) are still frozen in time exactly as I left them.

      You lucky guy. No one has expanded that software from a calculator to an enterprise-level accounting system by adding layer after layer of code, all of which depends on those bugs to operate properly, and none of which is either documented or makes any sense, all of which has been heavily optimized by a programmer subscribing to the "shorter variable names make the program run faster, one-letter ones are fastest" school of performance tuning... And of course the source code to none of it has not been lost.

      Now, for a real nightmare, imagine that code existing in the real world for 500 years ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  122. Communismo o muerte! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He may wake the richest man on Earth, but only because there will be marxist communism on Earth in 100 years and money will cease to exist.

    The production means of mankind will be so vastly increased by then that poverty, hunger and homelessness would be eliminated long ago and everybody will be able to take according to his/her needs. People will create (work) not because of necessity, but because of joy, as to work (to transform the environment, to create meaningfully) is one of the three basic gifts that differentiates humans from animals: speech, thinking and work.

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels calculated all this more than a hundred years ago! This will be the future of mankind, not Adam Smith. If the marxist aim is not realized, mankind will soon exterminate itself, because the destructive means are more and more advanced every year and greed will trigger them. In 50 years everybody will be able to build a pocket nuke at home. If there is no brotherly love and egality, either the tyranns or the oppressed will explode their ones. Communismo o muerte!

    P.s. Let me tell you that it is not possible to wake up dead people, because that is resurrection. Maybe Jesus and his saints can do that, but not science. The millionare should have himself frozen while terminally ill, not after he is brain-dead, no matter how soon. What ceases to exist is pernanently gone.

    1. Re:Communismo o muerte! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spare me your Marxist bullshit. In your new future utopia, I want to sit on my ass while you clean my toilet and cook me meals, and take away my garbage. Why should I work when you'll do it for the fun? what a fucking load of shite.

  123. Re:You forget the nano/biotech revolution comming. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in the comming years it will be natural for future slashdotters to be able to handle the complexities of nano and biotech programming of nanotech assemblers and nanosensors and be able to do a lot of "matter" hacking even though there will

    No it won't. Replicating nanobots are pure sci-fi, and nano assembly is going to stay industrial for at least the next 100 years. Slashdotters are not going to be able to create a woman out of sand anytime soon.

    we should be able to advance nano/bio in the next 10 years to be able to demonstrate age halting/reversal in mice (the M-prize), and then, soon in people.

    Halting age is not the problem. Fatuige is. People could easily live until 150 if their body did not slowly succum to acumulated wear and tear. Free radicals will turn your brain to putty long before you ever had a hope of reaching 200.

    It may be hard to do, but, remember, they went to the moon in 9 years using slide rules and mainframe 32 bit computers with core memory

    That's because it was possible to go to the moon. Most of the stuff you mention is about as feasable as a perpetual motion machine.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  124. Don't panic!... by meringuoid · · Score: 1

    ... but I read it first in The Restaurant at the End of the Universe.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  125. And become ambassador to... by moller · · Score: 1

    The Ferengi!

    Seriously, in one of the Star Trek:TNG novels (I forget which one), the businessman from that first season episode had been made the Federation Ambassador to the Ferengi.

    Since no one else in the future utopia could understand them, this 20th century businessman was all set for it! It was really quite fantastic. He was all dressed up in a tuxedo (with tails), top hat, and a walking stick with a massive (fake) diamond on the handle. And all of his gear was tricked out James Bond style, like a saw in the brim of the top hat, and a locator device/communicator in the walking stick.

    1. Re:And become ambassador to... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      If you could replicate anything, why would it be any harder to replicate a pure carbon grid rather than ZrSiO grid? He and the Ferangi are more likely to be impressed with the shinier version.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:And become ambassador to... by macadamia_harold · · Score: 1

      If you could replicate anything, why would it be any harder to replicate a pure carbon grid rather than ZrSiO grid?

      Maybe because they had to re-route the heisenberg compensators through a tachyon grid, in order to restore anti-matter flow to the space-time continuators due to damage from a reverse subspace quantum singularity?

      or something...?


    3. Re:And become ambassador to... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Seriously, in one of the Star Trek:TNG novels (I forget which one), the businessman from that first season episode had been made the Federation Ambassador to the Ferengi.

      The Neutral Zone. Reintroduction of the Romulans into Star Trek canon as the big bad guys of the series since the Klingons were friendly now.

    4. Re:And become ambassador to... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      TNG novels are not canon. The question is, are the new DS-9 novels canon?

  126. In other news... by williamhb · · Score: 1

    ...in 20,000AD, the carniverous species that evolved from chihauhas has discovered a new source of frozen meat snacks.

  127. Investments aren't being sucked out of the economy by cduffy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It would be "sucked out of the economy" if he stuck it under his mattress. He has it invested. Money that's invested is funding companies that pay taxes, produce products, and do all those other useful things that money that's part of the economy does.

  128. But then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He will wake up with a craving for anchovies, buy the last tin on earth and in the process lose all his money to an elaborate con

  129. Red Dwarf? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    Looks like Futurama to me.

  130. You must have taken the red pill... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Otherwise you would know this is already happening.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  131. Don't forget the RIAA by bobamu · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Replicator Industry Association Off America will sue them all

  132. Earning interest?? by smchris · · Score: 1

    You mean he isn't going to put it in the stock market? My retirement account is already back to where it was in 2000.

    And how does he know it won't cost $100 million for 1000 Chinese with fiberoptics and nanotools to repair his jelly pan back to where he can lurch and crave human flesh.

  133. Some rules that could help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he could wake up in 100 years the richest man in the world

    As a non-popsicle member of society, I now vote to pass a law that proposes:

    (1) The cost of healing and defrosting should be proportional to the size of a popsicle's assets - possibly capping the remainder returned to the popsicle at, say, 10 times the median household income - enough to get set up again with a place to live, transportation and entertainment while they attend a 2-year manditory social, history and vocational training program to reintroduce them to society and the employment market.

    (2) You may only be frozen and revived once. If you suffer a life-threatening injury again, you're not going back into the freezer if it can't be fairly easily fixed with technology of the time. So when you wake up cured of cancer, don't get in a motorcycle accident.

    (3) The possiblity of being selected by the guardians of your cryogenic suspension to populate an off-world colony, to augment the survival of the species on redundant planets. You're already frozen for the trip out. You may be woken up on the Moon, Mars.. or somewhere else - possibly with your body having been adjusted to function well in a different gravity. I would suggest that it be prohibited to give you a radically different body (eg: a full-body cyborg) without your express consent.

    (4) Protector Of The Terran Empire. I'm still unsure about this one - but basicly the terms of your defrosting should include a clause that prohibits you from knowingly commiting acts that are detrimental or negative towards the human race. You should have a moral obligation to uphold the law and contribute positively to society. I'd note that if we ever have alien contact, those frozen before the alien contact would make the most trustworthy and loyal intelligence agents, having never grown up to know aliens.

    I'd also suggest that everyone thinking about signing a freezer contract has to read Transmetropolitan first. There's a subplot involving defrosted cryogenic suvivors, who re-enter the world in a state of psychological trauma - and are extreme outcasts of society, facing segregation and violence. The world was already strange to them when they died at an old age - but now it's absolutely insane - making it difficult to them to keep their own sanity intact.

    Of course, I'm still hoping for the singularity to hit within my natural lifetime and that our conciousness can be instantly transfered into an ethereal nanomachine entity on event of the death of our physical body - then we can spend the rest of the universe playing among the stars until the universe dies a heat death.

  134. Re:I see your quote and raise a Red Dwarf referenc by pilybaby · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That is Futureama, not Red Dwarf

    I think this is what you meant:

    Holly: "Busy, Dave?"
    Lister: "Well, yeah. I am, actually".
    Holly: "Oh, then you won't want to know about the two super-lightspeed fighters that are tracking us".
    Lister: "What?!"
    Holly: "I'll leave you to your bubble blowing, mate".
    Lister: "No, Hol, come on, come on".
    Holly: "They're from Earth".
    Lister: "Three million years away?"
    Holly: "They're from the NorWEB federation".
    Lister: "What's that?"
    Holly: "The North Western Electricity Board. They want you, Dave".
    Lister: "Me? Why? What for?"
    Holly: "For your crimes against humanity".
    Lister: "You what!"
    Holly: "It seems when you left Earth three million years ago, you left two half-eaten German sausages on a plate in your kitchen".
    Lister: "Did I?"
    Holly: "You know what happens to sausages left unattended for three million years?"
    Lister: "Yeah. They go all mouldy".
    Holly: "Your sausages, Dave, now cover seven-eighths of the Earth's surface. Also you left seventeen pounds, fifty pence in a bank account. Thanks to compound interest you now own ninety-eight percent of all the world's wealth, but since you've hoarded it for three million years nobody's got any money except for you and NorWEB".
    Lister: "Why NorWEB?"
    Holly: You left a light on in the bathroom. I've got a final demand here for £180 billion.
    Lister: £180 billion? You're kidding?
    Holly: (wearing Groucho Marx disguise) "April fool".
    Lister: "But it's not April".
    Holly: "Yeah, I know, but I could hardly wait six months with a red-hot jape like that under my belt".

  135. freezing destroys cells by gilboooo · · Score: 1

    Stupid.

    When you are frozen, the water in your cells (and your body is mostly water) does FROZE. When this happens, the shards of that frozen water puncturate your damn [censored] cells, destroying them.

    So you are in even worse biological "shape" once frozen than just dead. By frozing you destroy your cells when water freezes there.

    I am amazed how this simple stupid fact is never explained to people that want to get frozen.

    1. Re:freezing destroys cells by pontifier · · Score: 1

      Look at the state of the art in cryonics, then look at the alternatives... cremation, burial, or mumification. which has the best chance to save the information that makes you you? actualy... im wondering about being encased in amber now...

      --
      -John Fenley
    2. Re:freezing destroys cells by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      It's okay to not know key facts about modern cryonics, as you clearly don't. You don't start looking like an idiot until you call people who don't share your ignorance of these facts "stupid".

      What's the most advanced bio or chem class you've taken?

  136. Just wait by indytx · · Score: 0, Troll
    'Mr. Pizer says that with his money earning interest while he is frozen, he could wake up in 100 years the richest man in the world.'

    I bet that he'll blow it all on a can of anchovies.

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
  137. Lets assume by catahoula10 · · Score: 1

    Assuming that this person could be raised from the dead a couple hundred years from now, what kind of life would that person have? This reminds me of a movie "Shawshank Redemption" when a prisoner was finally released after 40 or so years. The world around him had changed so much that he could not cope so he killed himself.

    Who is to say that money will even be used in the future?
    Everything this person loves so much that drives them to want to live again or live forever will probably be gone. Including friends,loved ones and their money.

    They could wake up a vegetable, or wake up with some of their body parts that did not survive the trip. They could wake up without arms or legs, or sight and sound. Now, they are broke, they are desolute, and they are alone in a world where they are not comfortable AND they have no arms or legs!
    Then again, science of that day may turn them into a lab experiment. A kinda living time capsule. Many dieases may be cured by then and they dont want the persom around to infect everyone with dieases of the past.

    How did these people ever make enough money when when they were alive to pay for cryo since they obviously cannot think the issues through!

    HEll, Apes may be running the planet!

    This has to be the funniest get rich quick scheme.

    --
    This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
    Catahoula!
    1. Re:Lets assume by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      Everything this person loves so much that drives them to want to live again or live forever will probably be gone.

      What if curiousity is what makes them want to live again? Or the sheer joy of remembering the good times and continuing to be alive?

      If you personally knew any cryonicists, I think you'd find that they've thought things through far better than people with the conventional attitude toward death.

    2. Re:Lets assume by catahoula10 · · Score: 1

      "What if curiousity is what makes them want to live again?"

      The phrase "curiousity killed the cat" was coined for a reason.

      "Or the sheer joy of remembering the good times and continuing to be alive?"

      Well, "remembering the good times" is not more important then making the good times. Making more good times may be hard to do for someone born in the 20th century and waking up in the 26th century, even assuming all body parts and wealth survives.

      --
      This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
      Catahoula!
    3. Re:Lets assume by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      How many times do I have to state the obvious? If I don't like living in the future, death is always an option. I just don't like it being the only option.

      And if you're not curious, WTF are you reading this article for? Oh yeah, I forgot, because it's fun to lecture others about the follys of hubris, selfishness, and curiousity.

    4. Re:Lets assume by catahoula10 · · Score: 1

      "If I don't like living in the future, death is always an option."

      Maybe the folks that wake ya up turn you into a lab rat because they find you intresting. Then you cannot use your death option.

      BTW, I take a position and debate an issue, i do not "lecture others about the follys of hubris, selfishness, and curiousity."

      You do not like my position on the issue as is your right.

      Thanks for the intresting debate on this topic.

      --
      This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
      Catahoula!
  138. You just don't get this autonomy thing, do you? by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You get to decide what you should do and what you deserve. Other people get to decide what they should do and what they deserve. And the burden of proof is on you to show that the decisions someone else makes about their life or death have more of a negative impact on you than regulations prohibiting that class of behavior would have on everybody.

    1. Re:You just don't get this autonomy thing, do you? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      That's right, I don't get to decide.

      nature has already decided.

      --
      This space available.
    2. Re:You just don't get this autonomy thing, do you? by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      Nature has already decided.

      Yeah, but nobody listens to that old broad anymore.

    3. Re:You just don't get this autonomy thing, do you? by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Nature hasn't "decided" this matter any more than nature has decided that people should die from polio or have an average lifespan of around 30 years.

      Mankind has decided to cure diseases and improve overall health care. Mankind learned how to perform surgery and develop medicines. Cryonics is a medical procedure- nothing more. It shouldn't rail against your ethics any more than blood transfusions or open heart surgery do.

      If it makes you feel any better, cryonics != immortality. You could get blown up or incinerated in a plane crash and still be permanently dead, and even if you manage to avoid that, it currently looks like the universe will end due to entropy eventually anyway. In the meantime, I see no reason to willfully allow myself to die needlessly.

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    4. Re:You just don't get this autonomy thing, do you? by mfrank · · Score: 1

      So, I'm guessing you're not diabetic . . .

  139. Re:Stephen Baxter by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    I think it was Stephen Baxter explored this idea as well in "Manifold: space". People take advantage of relativistic effects to travel a few centuries forward in time, to find themselves rich from the interest on their bank accounts. However, when the scheme becomes popular it start to seriously mess up the economy, and governments start seizing the assets of these time travellers.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  140. There wouldn't BE "makers of everything" by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    There would just be people that sold you one candy bar/computer/car along with enough material to make new ones, for a profit. I haven't thought of this extensively, but I think the world would be better (you could have anything you want, cheaply).

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  141. It's from a book by wurp · · Score: 1

    "A World Out of Time" by Larry Niven. For the people around here who, say, actually read the sci-fi by the masters, it's an amusing reference. An in-joke for the geeky thinker.

    It's totally meaningless to you, I'm sure.

  142. Life Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you collect your own life insurance?

    1. Re:Life Insurance by pontifier · · Score: 1

      answer I got from my insurance salesman: If you are legaly dead, and there is a death certificate, they pay the money, and the contract is fullfilled at that point. If you are brought back to life at some point in the future, it doesn't matter to them. (you paid untill you died, and they paid when you died)

      --
      -John Fenley
  143. Hotblack Desiato by phantomflanflinger · · Score: 1

    Remember Hotblack Desiato in The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy (the radio series / book) spending a year dead for tax reasons? The best SciFi always comes true.

    --
    shin phantomflanflinger
  144. frozen strawberries by __aapspi39 · · Score: 1

    Even if the subject was frozen before death, the real problem is that when you defrost certain types of organic matter, it doesn't retain its original state too well; anyone who's tried to freeze strawberries will know that the resultant mush is not very appetising.

    No matter how great the future advances in technology, anyone frozen now will lose all the structure of their brain cells in the process.

    As far as science is concerned, cryogenics is actually a recent example of an ancient and respected art- that of separating silly people from their money.

    1. Re:frozen strawberries by MSZ · · Score: 1

      This is why I used words like "chance". Now and with the advances we can expect, this chance is slim. Maybe if these people would put some of these money they want to waste into research - solid honest research - that chance could become much higher.

      But what they actually do... well, the part you wrote about they have perfected ;-)

      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
  145. "useful to society"? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    >So coming out of cryosleep is like graduating with a
    >liberal arts degree, then?

    Hee hee ... that is a good one :) (seriously)

    But seriously, what is this "useful to society" crap? Who gets to set that standard, and how many of us would meet it?

    1. Re:"useful to society"? by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

      In the absence of any supreme all-knowing all-powerful authority, the standard-setting defaults to the market. Those of us who are gainfully employed meet this standard. The bar isn't very high.

  146. For the non--trekkies... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    The parent is referring to the Star Trek TNG episode The Neutral Zone, where some people who were cryogenically frozen in the 20th centry are awaken on board the Enterprise. Hilarity ensues when the wealthy stock-broker tycoon discovers that "the economics of the 24th centry are somewhat different" - money is no longer used on Earth and his vast "fortune" is worthless.

    1. Re:For the non--trekkies... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Hilarity ensues when the wealthy stock-broker tycoon discovers that "the economics of the 24th centry are somewhat different" - money is no longer used on Earth and his vast "fortune" is worthless.

      The only way money ever becomes obsolete is if there are infinite resources, which would make economics meaningless. Money is, in the end, a handy single-number resource counter; it's still money whether you call them dollars or pounds or ResUnits.

      As ST universe clearly has limited resources (everyone doesn't have their own starships, AI is still too limited to handle all duties, Federation's warfleet is of finite size and cannot be grown or replaced arbitrarily fast) there is either money or hell of a pain in the ass in accounting department of Starfleet HQ.

      That's what I've never understood about these future utopias - they all try to make money seem like the root of all evil. It is not. It is just a convenient abstraction, allowing efficient resource management, which is good for everyone involved, since more efficient resource management wastes less and thus produces more surpluss, which makes for better living even for the poor.

      Greed is the root of all evil. Money is just a convenience.

      To get back to topic, no I don't think that the cryonauts will ever be thawed. Even if that ever becomes possible (which is pretty unlikely - these people are dead, after all), would anyone really want them around ? After all, it raises all these questions about property ownership and legal issues (should you pay taxes for the time you were dead ?), while an unfortunate "accidental" power failure at night solves them all.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  147. Henry Ford by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

    You don't have to step into the realm of Sci-Fi to see how a perpetual trust can deviate from its founder's intent. Do you think Henry Ford would approve of what the Ford Foundation is doing today? More recently deceased rugged individualistic-type philanthropists (John M Olin, for example) have reacted by requiring thier charitable trusts to spend themselves out of existence after a period of time.

    1. Re:Henry Ford by metamatic · · Score: 1
      Do you think Henry Ford would approve of what the Ford Foundation is doing today?

      I dunno, the guy did think Adolf Hitler was a nice bloke with some good ideas.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  148. Richest man on earth? by vsimon · · Score: 1

    $10,000,000 at 4% "safe" interest for 100 years will total about 1.04^100*10000000= $500,000,000. Big deal, not even billionaire status! Also adjust for inflation and its really closer to $300,000,000

  149. It's not hard to do... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    ..but it is easyt o detect forgerties, because replication results in single-bit errors in the quantum structure of the molecules.

    Or something like that.... it's been awhile since I read my TNG technical manual. But that is basicaly how they explain that they can't just replicate a person - the replicators only work at molecular level resolution, whereas the transporters use quantum level resolution, and they can't store the data.

  150. asset trusts limited to living beneficeries by peter303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Generally states limit the lifetime monies held by nonliving entities (trusts) to living beneficies or one generation thereafter. Family/dynasty trusts like the Rockefellers or Kennedies have to renewed each generation.
    To be blunt, the even the dead cant avoid taxes forever. The concept of the dead and unborn owning assets is alien to current law.

  151. Why bother... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    .. when you're going to blow it all on a can of greasy anchovies anyways?

    Mmmmm..... anchovies.

  152. Would anyone bother to thaw them? by Tech · · Score: 1

    Imagine they had the technology and forethought 200 years ago to freeze people on the assumption that some time in the future someone would come up with the technology to thaw them out and "save" them from their terminal illness. Imagine also that we in 2006 now had the requisite thawing technology. Why should we bother to use it? The world already has enough of its own problems without reanimating a bunch of ancient aging rich snobs who are just going to complain that the music is too loud and the transport too fast. Will the modern day company, which evolved out of the company that signed the original contract 200 years ago, even bother fetching that contract from its display in the British Museum? Why should we think it will be any different 200 years from now?

  153. Useless bit of Red Dwarf trivia... by Gildersleeve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The joke was originaly from a radio sketch comedy show from the early 80s called 'Son of Cliche', with the Red Dwarf writers and Chris Barrie among the cast. Barrie was the original Dave Lister.

    1. Re:Useless bit of Red Dwarf trivia... by Gildersleeve · · Score: 1

      The joke was originaly from a radio sketch comedy show from the early 80s called 'Son of Cliche', with the Red Dwarf writers and Chris Barrie among the cast. Barrie was the original Dave Lister.

      Or was Barrie the computer and Nick Wilton the 'Lister' character? I can't remember now, I haven't heard the bloody show for 20 years.

  154. Synaptic degeneration by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the big problem in cryonics is that after 5 minutes of hypoxia, synapses start to degenerate. I really think this is a significant information loss, not something repairable. Even if you could put some of the neurons back together, you will have a hard time figuring out which neuron is connected to which and with what strength.

    Perhaps your body could come back, but unless you are frozen pretty much immediately upon onset of lethal hypoxia, the brain you come back with will not be much like your own.

    1. Re:Synaptic degeneration by TheSync · · Score: 1

      BTW, if you don't believe me, look at the images in this paper which shows significant dendritic spine loss after 25 minutes of lethal hypoxia.

    2. Re:Synaptic degeneration by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I think it's worse than that. What makes me me is continuity of the complex emergent behavior of the system. Once you shut down electrical activity, that's it—death. Maybe you can revive the body and restart electrical activity, but the resulting person won't be me, even if he thinks he is.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:Synaptic degeneration by VoiceOfDoom · · Score: 1
      From what I can tell, cryonics has a way to go yet.


      1. Thawing people who have been frozen for years. As far I am aware, water expands when it's frozen. Cell walls burst. Tissue turns to mush. Either repairing that damage, or preventing it are currently beyond the horizon of science (AFAIK)


      2. Bringing dead people back to life. We're nowhere *near* this in our current scientific and medical knowledge. Humankind may never suss it out (some pretty awesome philosophical questions would be raised if we did!) and it seems to me that tying up a whole load of money in the hope that someday, someone might figure it out goes way beyond being a speculative investment!


      3. Assuming that the societies of the future will *want* to thaw you instead of seizing your assets and making off with them in the dead of night. You might hate the society you awake in ("Demolition Man", anyone?). Or the sci-fi story of a reanimated chap having no money or rights and being used as a guinea pig. What, you think human nature's gonna change?


      Anyway, it seems a little too far-out for me - I can think of better things to spend my money on! For an interesting perspective on cryonics (and a rip-roaring good yarn) check out this book

      --
      "Life is pain Highness. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something"

      Westly, The Princess Bride

    4. Re:Synaptic degeneration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont ever lose consciousness even for a second ever again, and if you do, you're not you anymore so there's no point in living right?

    5. Re:Synaptic degeneration by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I dream when I sleep. Don't you?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    6. Re:Synaptic degeneration by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Rather than get into a point-by-point debate, I'll simply refer you here to address the specific technical questions:
      http://www.alcor.org/sciencefaq.htm

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  155. Wealth by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

    Eventually all the wealth on earth will be tied up in a bunch of dead people.

    --
    // This is not a sig.
  156. Their egos are way too big to freeze, though by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    What good is freezing their bodies without those massive egos? Surely people are self-important as them can't just be allowed to die like us mere mortals! We must start a campaign to prevent the estinguishing of their bright lights in the world.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  157. Cryo as a way to get rich... by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

    Essentially, if one could just be cryogenized for a long period of time, for the sake of making money, more and more people would do it, thus reducing the economic activity and the interest rates, in the end, you'd have a balance between the loss of "losing" a few years and gaining not so much more interests. Arbitrages using cryo would soon disappear.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  158. Re:Perpetual Ownership by vertinox · · Score: 1

    All I can say is, let it go. You don't own anything in perpetuity, not even the water and dirt your body is made of.

    So true. That is what corporations are for.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  159. Overcrowding by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen a population graph? It looks like a perfect exponential curve, and it skyrockets in the past century.

    If we start bringing people back to life, we're only going to make the overcrowding problem much, much worse.

    Two other thoughts:

    What obligation do you have to unthaw people? Maybe I've got your frozen body from 150 years ago in my lab. But who would know if I just threw it out instead? Prepaying for it does you no good when you have no idea if the company will be around, and no one who was a witness to your contract.

    And what does this do to religion? People struggle to reconcile evolution with the bible's stories of creation (well, mostly, people just argue with the other side, but some try to reconcile the two beliefs). What will the religious ever do when we start bringing people back to life?

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  160. Re:You forget the nano/biotech revolution comming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's because it was possible to go to the moon. Most of the stuff you mention is about as feasable as a perpetual motion machine."

    How remarkably ignorant. Nothing is ever known to be possible until it is done. Having a living being go to the moon and return home safely had not been previously known. No previous case demonstrated its' possibility.

    Those items you mention are demonstrated within natural biology. It is most certainly possible. Assuming we amass enough knowledge and skill. If they were not possible, you and I and all other forms of life would have died from old age many generations before multicellular life could have formed.

  161. This is all too hard to bear by rssrss · · Score: 1

    The chance that any of these people will ever be re-animated is zero. It's not like the world has need for more people, the world population will be 9 billion by mid-century. Further, there is no ability to reanimate frozen fish, let lone frozen people, and I cannot imagine a less urgent area for bio-medical research.

    At some point the heirs of these people (or the government, which always need more money) will turn off the refrigerator, cremate the remains and take the money.

    Come on folks, learn to deal with the fact that when you die you will be dead (physically at any rate, no opinion is expressed herein on religious doctrines) and your things will belong to others. You can give them away wisely or unwisely, but you can't take it with you.

    P.S. the article did not say whether the frozen had filed an estate tax return or whether they were still paying income taxes, but they have to do one or the other. Since a human body in liquid nitrogen is dead, whether or not it may live again, I am going with the likelyhood that the IRS will be wanting their Estate Tax.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  162. Re:You forget the nano/biotech revolution comming. by ultranova · · Score: 1

    No it won't. Replicating nanobots are pure sci-fi, and nano assembly is going to stay industrial for at least the next 100 years. Slashdotters are not going to be able to create a woman out of sand anytime soon.

    True. But if they play D&D, they can make a porn golem out of soapstone. Or simply cast "Summon sex partner".

    Moderators: if anyone answers and actually knows from which supplement this reference is from, mod them informative. They've earned it ;).

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  163. Fluctuation much? by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    Just think, if he'd frozen himself five years ago, and invested his trust in southern Louisiana land and Enron stock.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  164. An Incredible Tide of Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The state-of-the-art in cryonics today is *vitrification*, not freezing. Very high quality brain preservation is possible when freezing is prevented with cryoprotectants

    http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/braincryopreserv ation1.html

    Changes in dendritic spines cited by one poster as evidence that 5 minutes of clinical death is irreversible are in fact known to be *spontaneously reversible*!

    http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/2 2/5333

    The world record for recovery of large animals without brain damage after intervals of clinical death at normal temperature using advanced resuscitation technology is now 16 minutes, not 5 minutes.

    http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/annals.html

    Even just post-resuscitation hypothermia, hemodilution, and hypertension will get you to 13 minutes

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=2298837

    The brain doesn't go "kaboom" after a few minutes of circulatory arrest. Foreseeable technologies will likely eventually extend the reach of resuscitation medicine to one hour or more of clinical death at normal temperatures. A person with a stopped heart is fundamentally A SICK PERSON that doesn't really die until much later.

    On top of it all, all this is moot for cryonics patients who suffer attended cardiac arrest, for whom the preservation process is started immediately, the first step being restoration of blood circulation and oxygenation.

    http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/CardiopulmonaryS upport.html

    People should do at least some minimum checking before making confident pronouncements about the stupidity of others. There are some very sharp people behind this field

    http://www.cryoletter.org/

  165. This honestly isn't about ego. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

    I really don't think of myself as being more worthy of life than other people, or somehow so special as to be worth preserving for the future, or anything like that.

    I just really like being alive and I don't want to die. I've never once wavered from this desire, and I honsetly don't think I ever will, no matter how much hardship life offers me.

    Very early in life I faced this, and admitted to myself that I will do whatever it takes to survive as long as possible as long as I don't have to harm other human beings.

    Then, and now, there are three basic options open to me: studying aging, participating in cryonics, and faith in the afterlife. I keep an open mind about all three, but given the lack of hard evidence for the existance of an afterlife in the literal sense, I am concentrating my efforts on the first two.

    I don't begrudge other people a long life. In fact, the more the merrier... and the sooner we grow enough balls to admit that we want to LIVE, the sooner we'll force ourselves to solve the technical and social obstacles that stand in our way. And the sooner people will really start taking the long view about how we should be living upon our as yet only planet.

  166. Re:Investments aren't being sucked out of the econ by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

    Money, yes. Land, no.

    --
    Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
  167. If I had a spare $10 million... by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

    If I had a spare $10 million, I would use it to hedge my bets, but not by putting it in trust for myself. I'd give it to Alcor right now on condition that they use it to build a windfarm and solar array large enough to operate compressor units in order to produce their own liquid nitrogen should there be any disruption in the supply.

    The second biggest threat to Alcor after legal harassment is extended disruptions in the energy supply or the transportation/distribution networks. From my conversations with other cryonicists, the consensus seems to be "let's ignore the problem and hope it never, ever happens". If they believe that, they really are the wishful thinkers that "normal" people accuse them of being. I feel that given a period of centuries, it's a near certainty that Scottsdale, AZ will experience at least one disruption of one sort or another in its liquid nitrogen shipments lasting a month or longer.

    The one indispensible input Alcor needs from the outside world is liquid N2. As long as there's plenty of that, the dewars can function without electricity. By paying for a robust local renewable energy grid, Pizer could have made himself not only cancer and heart disease proof, but also peak-oil resistant and economic chaos resistant... along with all the fellow cryonicists interred at the Alcor facility.

  168. Re:Investments aren't being sucked out of the econ by cduffy · · Score: 1

    If he isn't at least renting out the land he owns for the hundred years he's dead, then he's stupid (or at least making suboptimal use of his resources).

  169. Re:Investments aren't being sucked out of the econ by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

    Right ... but it means that someone else is *not* owning it and receiving the benefits thereof. I'm all in favor of property rights, but this is ridiculous!

    --
    Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
  170. Very long is not forever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Then how do you explain the f'ed up Copyright system??

    Apparently, they do not think that retroactively extending copyright terms in a scheme where every 20 years we lengthen it by 20 years (thus, not allowing anything to escape copyright) is perpetual.

    This is most likely because the heat death of the universe will prevent life from living in this universe forever and while copyright may last untold trillions of years (and perhaps much longer), that amount of time is still very finite. Further, life on Earth will probably be doomed by something or another long before that.

    In other words, don't worry: copyright isn't forever, even if it would seem to be destined to outlive us all.

  171. The way it works with Alcor by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

    This is correct. You name Alcor as the beneficiary on your life insurance policy. That's what pays for your suspension.

    I'm sure that the trust fund Pizer set up is much more elaborate than that, and goes far beyond just paying for suspension. His might not even involve life insurance, dunno. Most of us are in a very different situation than he is.

  172. How to get a policy. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

    If, after you're done with your Futurama jokes and "moral" indignation you secretly want to look into this further, read the cryonics funding information page. If you're uncomfortable explaining the whole thing cold to an insurance agent (they're not the most inaginative and open minded people in the world, after all) Alcor also maintains a list of insurance agents who have worked with Alcor members in the past. A phone conversation with one of these folks, a physical checkup a week later, pay your premiums and Alcor fees, and *poof* you too have a cryo contract.

  173. The opposition to cryonics. by f1r3br4nd · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell the main arguments against cryo are "It probably won't work" and "It feels wrong, somehow, and I don't want other people doing it".

    The "won't work" argument falls flat immediately because even though there are a lot of risks, nobody has yet proposed any options more likely to work which are mutually exclusive with cryonics. The worst thing that can happen is that you'll die anyway, and be no worse off than if you never got a contract.

    I think the "feels wrong" argument will not be able to prevail either, because the will to live is stronger than the will to stop living, and even more so than the will to prevent others from living at no benefit to one's own self. Furthermore, individuals who are so weary of life that they think death is a good thing may also be too passive to win out over the numerically smaller but more determined individuals who want to indefinitely postpone their deaths.

  174. Addressing your first point... by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    So they can't cover their expenses well? So what is there to assure a person that Alcor will still be around in even 100 years? What happens to the corpsicles if they go bankrupt?

    Alcor is actually two separate legal entities: the Alcor Life Extension Foundation and the Alcor Patient Care Trust. The Patient Care Trust is financially independent. It owns the property and the entire facility outright, as well as the actual insurance payouts from suspended members (before anyone even goes there, it's set up such that it can't be raided Enron-style). The Trust's sole concern is the care and maintenance (and eventual reanimation) of patients who are in suspension. The maintenance costs are less than most people think (for example: the dewars don't use electricity, and only need to have their liquid nitrogen topped off periodically), and the interest that the Trust earns is more than enough to meet those costs in perpetuity without dipping into the principal. In short, barring a total collapse of society it's not going anywhere.

    Alcor Life Extension Foundation is the "face" of Alcor, and handles the actual suspensions, as well as research, PR, training, publishing Cryonics magazine, etc. It rents the facility from the Trust, employs the majority of Alcor's staff, and has significantly higher operating costs than the Trust, without the benefit of a self-sufficient source of income. This is what the grandparent post was referring to.

    I think it's important to understand that ALEF needs the PCT, but the PCT does not need ALEF. In the unlikely event ALEF were to fold (I say unlikely because they've been around for over 30 years and have only grown more stable over time), the patients currently in suspension would not be affected one bit. Given that they are the most vulnerable people in the entire operation, I think it makes very good sense that the organization is structured in this way. I wouldn't be wearing this funky bracelet if it were otherwise.

    As an aside, almost without exception every concern or objection that I've seen brought up in this thread directly relating to cryonics is addressed on Alcor's web site. A little research goes a long way.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  175. Do some research! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    Actually, the body is "ruined" when the original relevant cell structures can no longer be inferred from the current structure. Given that even with current technology tissue samples, fetuses, and some entire organs can be preserved for an arbitrary period of time, thawed, and successfully used it's clear that the issue isn't so simple.

    A lot depends on the quality of the suspension, and that can vary significantly depending on the circumstances surrounding the patient's "death". If a body is found after several days then yes, the outlook is grim. Generally a patient isn't just "frozen", but instead goes through a rather involved process to minimize cellular damage using either "standard" cryoprotectants or, more recently, a vitrification solution. There is abundant information available on these processes and their outcomes.

    Please get your facts straight. I suggest starting here: http://www.alcor.org/sciencefaq.htm but by all means, go elsewhere and do research from other sources! Just please educate yourself on the topic before spouting off about it here.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  176. Who says no friends?!? by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    You might wake up someday, but you'll be broke, jobless, a relative idiot, nowhere to live, no friends or family, and maybe will have a crushing medical bill.

    Actually, after the first one or two people have been revived it's likely that the technology involved will be commodity and not to terribly expensive. Regardless, the cost is covered by the Patient Care Trust. If you don't have a trust set up then yes, you may come out of it broke, but not in debt.

    Broke? Set up a trust like in the original article. There are a couple of different avenues to take in this regard.

    Jobless? Probably at first. In all likelihood though, after the first successful resuscitation the rest of the patients (at least the ones who were sufficiently well-preserved as to be recoverable) will probably come out of the tank pretty quickly, allowing them to provide a support structure for each other as they're re-integrated into society.

    Idiot? Speak for yourself! ;-) By this I assume you mean "will have great difficulty adjusting to life in the future." It seems to me that the traits which will make someone better able to adapt- curiosity, a sense of adventure, zeal for life, willingness to think outside of the world they were originally taught- are the same traits which make one more likely to sign up for cryonics in the first place. It's a self-selecting group.

    No friends or family? Again, speak for yourself! I have a few close friends who are already signed up for cryonics, and most of my closest loved ones are in the process of signing up right now. Additionally, the cryonics community is pretty small, and relatively tightly-knit (given geographic diversity). I've met many cryonicists, and despite varying backgrounds, personalities, ages, and "kookiness levels" (I'm being frank here), I've noticed a single commonality between them: I like them. Every one I've met has struck me as an interesting and friendly person, and I'll happily go into the future with them. Even the kooky ones. :-)

    Thanks, but I think I might prefer to stay dead.

    To each his own, I suppose. Best of luck with that. To my way of thinking, cryonic suspension is the second worst thing that can happen to you, but still worth the nearly trivial cost.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  177. Low self-esteem? by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    It's only selfish and materialistic if you think that the world is better off without you. Personally, I don't think it's at all arrogant to believe that I'm capable of being a productive member of society- present or future.

    I may not be a "great man", but I'm not a parasite on society. I have a lot to contribute. Your comment indicates that you feel otherwise about yourself.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  178. Here's why! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    I take objection to so much of what you're ranting about here that it's a challenge to keep this from becoming a counter-rant, but I'm going try by focussing only on your basic question.

    The Alcor Patient Care Trust is legally obligated to care for those in suspension until they are repaired/revived. The maintenance costs for the patients in suspension is low, but at some point it becomes cheaper to revive them than to keep them perpetually suspended.

    Additionally, in order to be on the board of the Trust it's a requirement that you be a signed Alcor member. Additionally, of the 5 people on the board, at least 3 of them must have a relative or significant other in suspension.

    Check here for more information:
    http://www.alcor.org/AboutAlcor/patientcaretrustfu nd.html

    -Cybrex

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  179. Your line of reasoning is what's disturbing! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    I just firmly believe that if its your time to die, you're going to die regardless.

    I'm really not sure how to respond to this, as the basic premise is completely alien to me, but since it's a philosophical viewpoint I think that ultimately everyone needs to decide for themselves what value they place on their own life, so I respect your right to make that determination for yourself.

    would you really want to get dunked in liquid nitrogen only to wake up many years later in the same old decrepit body suffering of the same arthritis and whatnot?

    Given the alternative, YES! However, that's a misrepresentation of the situation. The technology that will enable us to cure old age- doing cellular repair at the molecular level- will be a precursor to the technology that will be required to repair and resuscitate cryonics patients. You won't wake up in a decrepit body.

    They would have to find cures for all of your ailments and old age, or they would need to clone you or place your memories and consciousness into a host body (be it organic or otherwise).

    Well, yeah. No argument there.

    Creepy.

    That's a subjective assessment. In my opinion, rotting in the ground and having everything that I've learned and become being reduced to worm food in truly creepy!

    I have to ask- do you find organ transplants "creepy"? How about artificial limbs?

    And if cryonics ever becomes a real problem

    A real problem? Huh? Kindly explain to me how saving lives is a problem. Do you have any suggestions for solving the heart surgery problem or the vaccinations against polio problem? After that maybe we can work on a solution to the problem of doctors washing their hands before operating, since this rampant "problem" is needlessly saving countless lives each year- far more than cryonics will ever hope to!

    I'm sure there will be fanatics and anti-corpsiclists (new word) to mob in and torch the homosapien iceboxes.

    Fanatics indeed. I'm willing to accept that you feel an urge to die at some divinely-determined time. In return, I respectfully request that you keep the torches and pitchforks to yourself and allow the rest of us to live our lives as we see fit.

    -Cybrex

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    1. Re:Your line of reasoning is what's disturbing! by Onuma · · Score: 1

      I just firmly believe that if its your time to die, you're going to die regardless.

      I'm really not sure how to respond to this, as the basic premise is completely alien to me, but since it's a philosophical viewpoint I think that ultimately everyone needs to decide for themselves what value they place on their own life, so I respect your right to make that determination for yourself.


      Well considering what I've seen in my life, it's my personal belief that you cannot control when you die - fate's gonna get you. Being in the military I've seen things the normal citizen will never see in their lifetime, I've been with in a hair's breadth of being the one who got hit with a mortar or some other explosive. I'm still here, so I take it as this simple idea: it wasn't my time. Not entirely too irrational now, is it?

      That's a subjective assessment. In my opinion, rotting in the ground and having everything that I've learned and become being reduced to worm food in truly creepy!

      I have to ask- do you find organ transplants "creepy"? How about artificial limbs?


      Organ transplants have been around since before I was born, and since they're internal you can't know that someone has another person's body part unless you're told so. Prosthesis has also been around, but having that be so visible most of the time, I do find it a little creepy. Not in the creepy that I get scared when I see it, but I think about the situation in which they lost their own limb and had to receive a prosthetic one. Again, most of whom I see are soldiers with a severed limb and it troubles me a little.

      Fanatics indeed. I'm willing to accept that you feel an urge to die at some divinely-determined time. In return, I respectfully request that you keep the torches and pitchforks to yourself and allow the rest of us to live our lives as we see fit.

      Like I said, when it's my time to go, it's my time. Nothing I can do to change that. I won't be the one torching and pitchforking Count Dracula's frozen body with the mob, but I see it as a possibility.

      --
      What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  180. Re:Investments aren't being sucked out of the econ by cduffy · · Score: 1
    Right ... but it means that someone else is *not* owning it and receiving the benefits thereof.

    Whenever anyone owns anything exclusively it means nobody else is owning it -- but whether there's still value to the economy is a completely separate matter. Remember, the argument I'm opposing is that this kind of action is somehow an economy-damaging "loophole", removing value which could otherwise be used productively, which government can and should be rightly used to fight.

    Consider the case where the land is rented or leased out (to some entity presumably getting value from it): The income from said rent or lease is going to go into investments, which feed the economy by making funds available for business use... [same argument as in the earlier post in this thread goes here].