Slashdot Mirror


iPod Takes Japan by Storm

conq writes "BusinessWeek reports on the soaring popularity of the iPod in Japan. From the article: 'iPod mania is alive and well in Japan -- one of the most competitive consumer-electronics markets on the planet. Despite an array of well-entrenched Japanese rivals, such as Sony and Matsushita, the iPod had cornered 51.3% of the digital-music player market as of the end of 2005, up from about 32% in 2004, according to research firm BCN. Sony was a distant second with 16.2%, while Panasonic grabbed just 8.2% of the market.'"

284 comments

  1. Interesting by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Popular technology popular. Interesting....

    1. Re:Interesting by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for some crazy Japanese iPod fetish to pop up.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Interesting by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are a few hentai movies out there who've beaten you to the punch

    3. Re:Interesting by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Ah, but do they love it enough to perform iBukkake?

    4. Re:Interesting by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      Not only is it not news, it never was; it's an opinion, nothing more. I don't know why this is on Slashdot.

  2. USA!!! USA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's payback for the whole Walkman thing back in the 80's !

    1. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Oh really? Just where is the iPod made?

      KFG

    2. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      The design--which is what most people really care about when making purchasing choices--in California. The assembly in China.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      Oh really? Just where is the iPod made?
      Steve Jobs' garage

    4. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by kfg · · Score: 1

      which is what most people really care about when making purchasing choices

      Purchasing choices are irrelevant.

      The assembly in China.

      Which is where all the money and infrastructure goes.

      Basically China is using Apple to finance all the R&D for them and handle the marketing while they make all the actual stuff and take the dough, because the iPod doens't make any money for Apple.

      Apple makes its money by selling the razor blades, the "content" to put on the iPod.

      Apple doesn't make or control that "content" either. They just market it.

      Who makes the "content"?

      AHA! Sony/BMG

      Go USA!

      KFG

    5. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see, both communist regiemes.

    6. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Basically China is using Apple to finance all the R&D for them and handle the marketing while they make all the actual stuff and take the dough, because the iPod doens't make any money for Apple. Apple makes its money by selling the razor blades, the "content" to put on the iPod.

      It is well known that Apple makes its money off the iPod. The few pennies it makes off the store are an added bonus, but the money is in the pod for sure.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    7. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by BrettJB · · Score: 2, Interesting
      because the iPod doens't make any money for Apple.

      Apple makes its money by selling the razor blades, the "content" to put on the iPod.


      Er, no, sorry... you've got that backwards.

      Apple makes a healthy profit on the iPods: http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,119799,0 0.asp
      They do make some money on the music sold through iTMS, but it's a pittance compared to the percentage they make on the hardware. Steve's basically said that iTMS exists to drive iPod sales.
      --
      Smell that? You smell that? Burning karma, son. Nothing in the world smells like that...
    8. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by BrettJB · · Score: 1

      Yeah-- what he said!!! (damn me for taking the time to google an article to back up my assertion on the iPod profit margins!) ;)

      --
      Smell that? You smell that? Burning karma, son. Nothing in the world smells like that...
    9. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The iPod makes Apple a ton of money. Practically holding the company up.
      net sales in millions :

      12/25/04: 1,211
      12/31/05: 2,906
      Change: 140 %

      SEC Filing:
      http://biz.yahoo.com/e/060203/aapl10-q.html

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by kfg · · Score: 1

      It is well known that Apple makes its money off the iPod.

      Mea Culpa.

      KFG

    11. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by jcr · · Score: 1

      Just where is the iPod made?

      China and Taiwan, IIRC. So, it's payback for WW2 as well.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by jcr · · Score: 1

      Basically China is using Apple to finance all the R&D for them and handle the marketing while they make all the actual stuff and take the dough, because the iPod doens't make any money for Apple.

      Guess again. iPod is making billions of dollars for Apple.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    13. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who makes the "content"?
      AHA! Sony/BMG
      Go USA!


      Got that wrong, too: Sony == Japan, BMG == Germany

    14. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Got that wrong, too: Sony == Japan, BMG == Germany

      Oooooh! Irony. No, I'm afraid we don't have much call for that around these parts.

      KFG

    15. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by kokojie · · Score: 0

      Chinese ipod assembly plants makes the most money? Chinese manufacturers have very VERY thin profit margins, for each ipod sold, Chinese manufacturer makes about 6% profit, Apples makes about 33% profit!!, the rest is cost. Also, this is where most of the so called "Trade deficit" came from. The manufactured ipod is exported from China to US, but it is actually the US company that made most of the money. US does not have a real "trade deficit".

    16. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by uncreativ · · Score: 1

      finally an american company gets in on the techno-gadget craze that goes on in asia--Japan in particular.

      maybe US companies will start producing more slick gadgets--so many cool technological gadgets get mode and marketed only for asian countries. being a bit of a geek, I would love that asian trend to come this side of the pacific.

    17. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .it is actually the US company that made most of the money. US does not have a real "trade deficit".

      Do not mistake money for wealth.

      KFG

    18. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? Or did you miss the entire outsourcing thing that's been going on for the past 25 years?

      I'm not a fan of outsourcing, but you're obviously looking at it through a bad telescope from another galaxy entirely.

      The factories are contracted by a company (such as Apple) to produce items, and they're paid per item. They are paid a price that covers components and labour for production, but nothing else. They see some profit (they're businesses, after all) but they see far less profit than Apple does.

      Apple make far less money on the content though, a few cents in the dollar. The rest goes to the RIAA and the credit card companies.

      I'm astounded at your grasp of how outsourcing works. It's truly novel.

    19. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Or did you miss the entire outsourcing thing that's been going on for the past 25 years?

      I outsource to China myself, because I cannot compete with them on the low end. I knew I'd end up here 30 years ago. I pay per item. In other words, I'm buying things from them and remarketing. I don't make the stuff. I just brand it and sell it. It's retail trade. I'm nothing but a marketing middleman. The Chinese factory's unpaid American sales staff. Although on paper I may look like the real company this is an illusion.

      I'm a shop keeper. They make shit. I collect abstractions of wealth. They create wealth.

      And the means to create wealth. Their profit margins are low in part because of the percentage of them that goes into capital investment in infrastructure. They're building the factories.

      We're decommissioning ours.

      And my abstractions flow increasingly in their direction, since when I trade my astractions for goods it tends to flow back to them again, since everyone else who can profit by it is outsourcing as well.

      Yes, I'm looking from another galaxy, but through a really good telescope. You might want to try it sometime. It lets you see things as they really are, which is, as often as not, not what you thought they were.

      Outsourcing has been going on for a lot more than 25 years. The American auto industry was built on outsourcing. But back in the day an American company outsourced to another American company and the money earned was used to buy American made goods, while American made goods flowed overseas. Dollars ciculated in America, each dollar doing a dollar's worth of work each time it changed hands.

      Now the goods flow from overseas, and that's where the money is dribbling to as well, because money has no value other than what it represents in the goods it is exchanged for. The value of money (as opposed to the quantity) follows the stuff.

      And while the most money may remain here, its actual buying power is often lower than what remains there, because money has no value, other than what you can exchange it for; and they can often exchange a dollar for more than we can exchange fifty dollars for.

      That's one of the reasons they can work cheaper than us if we pay them based on our goods values.

      Another reason is that they don't have a "lifestyle" that has been built around sucking at the tit of world.

      The world wants its tit back. You might have to learn to chew your own solid food before your life is done. Start getting used to the idea now.

      KFG

    20. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by bromo33333 · · Score: 1

      "The assembly in China. Which is where all the money and infrastructure goes."

      Nope. Contract manufacturers generally make very low gross margins. Apple holds all the strings and makes most of the money.

      They also have a hold on the content side of things with the popularity of iTunes.

      "Basically China is using Apple to finance all the R&D for them and handle the marketing while they make all the actual stuff and take the dough, because the iPod doens't[sic] make any money for Apple."

      Not sure where you are getting that idea from?

      #1: Contact manufacturers are a dime a dozen, cut each others' throat for assembly work, and generally don't make much money at all. At least not nearly as much as Apple.

      #2: If all the money and profits were made in factory work - then we would outsource everything but the factory work to lower wage countries. If Apple 's contract manufacturer were to make more money than them - and Apple would lose money or break even on the iPod - they would quickly be out of business and their lack of profit margins would let everyone know you are correct. They are making money hand over fist, and with any luck, the contractors that work for Apple are doing OK, too, but as the main company in charge of it, expect them to make most of the profits.


      Keep in mind also that "China" isn't a company and "China" isn't a monolithic organization, it is a country that has many companies in it. Does anyone know the name of the company that actually does the assembly work for Apple in assembly of the iPod?

      Creative design talent is in short supply and is profitable. The ability to snap a couple of things together, and screw a few philips heads screws isn't a high wage, high profit type of operation, and there a legions of people lining up to do it for you CHEAP. This is the reason for the decline of unskilled and semi-skilled factory jobs and union jobs in the West.

    21. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      AHA! Sony/BMG
      I was thinking Warner, which doesn't put rootkits on its CDs but still sucks because it sues so many of its artists' fans for just posting lyrics, but that's another story.
      But who actually makes the content? The artists. And there are those around the world.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    22. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by kfg · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Warner

      Warner isn't responsible for the Walkman.

      KFG

    23. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Contact manufacturers are a dime a dozen, cut each others' throat for assembly work, and generally don't make much money at all. At least not nearly as much as Apple.

      Right, though they can increase their margins a little by improving their efficiency so that it costs even less to produce each unit than they originally contracted at.

      However, it won't be long before they pass that savings on to the customers, in order to beat competitors for contracts, thus setting the manufacturer back to square one's slimmer margins.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    24. Re:USA!!! USA!!! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Okay, you give good points back from my somewhat flippant post.

      My understanding can be illustrated with a little example.

      Let's say I make toys. It costs me $100 to make 100 toys, from which I receive $500 revenue, or $400 profit.

      I can outsource to China who will make these toys for $25. I still sell them for $500, making me $475 profit. That's money I return to my shareholders, and they do whatever they like with it.

      The $25 that goes to China is weighed against $25 of toys that they deliver to me, balancing the trade.

      In China, that $25 goes a lot further than in my country, but I also paid them a lot less than I would have paid people in my country, so everyone wins. ... except the workers in my country. I sacked my small factory staff, and they now need to find work. If every factory owner does the same, then these people will be left with a stark choice - work in another field (and hope it's not outsourced) or starve to death. Not all people can re-train, for various reasons, so my decision hurts some people quite badly. ... and it's debatable if the workers in China are better off. After reading No Logo (by Naomi Klein) years ago, and several other books, I'm inclined to think that outsourcing can work, but not if it's done to sweatshops in free-trade zones. You can cut this issue up in so many ways, and it goes down largely to opinions. Certainly the factory-owners win, but many of the workers are paid so poorly that they're barely able to eat.

      But I get more money! So I shouldn't care. That's the beauty of outsourcing - the people who make such decisions are usually so far removed from the people they affect that they only ever see numbers on a page, not actual people struggling to find money for rent and food.

      I'm not actually a fan of outsourcing. I see why it happens, but I also see a huge potential for problems. If your food is produced in other countries, you're beholden to those countries and you need to keep them on-side. If your data centres sit in another country, you lose control of your data and that could be lethal. Sure, self-interest will help keep things going (as long as everyone plays merrily, the gravy train rolls on) but a chain is built through outsourcing, and as control recedes further, the chain grows longer and a weak link becomes more likely.

  3. The iPod is awesome.. cool... easy to use... by TechSnack · · Score: 0

    Not surprising that it is very popular... If somebody comes up with a 'real' iPod killer, that will be the craze... Time to move on...!

    1. Re:The iPod is awesome.. cool... easy to use... by mopslik · · Score: 5, Funny

      a 'real' iPod killer

      Here's one for only $7.

    2. Re:The iPod is awesome.. cool... easy to use... by neersign · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Apparently, you don't even have to go that far. All you need to do is put it in your pocket with your keys, then you can get lots of money back because "It scratches easily"

    3. Re:The iPod is awesome.. cool... easy to use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant a mp3 player. Ipod needs competition bad.

    4. Re:The iPod is awesome.. cool... easy to use... by masklinn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks like captain obvious feels mightly insightful today.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    5. Re:The iPod is awesome.. cool... easy to use... by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could just get a brick for free..

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  4. Big in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, to be big in Japan

  5. I was in Japan last week ... by Stan+Chesnutt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... and I saw a LOT of people wearing iPods in the trains, walking on the streets, and at the Narita airport. I talked with a few people about the iPod, and most were using them for Japanese pop music ripped from CDs: I did not meet anyone who had used the iTunes store.

    Further, most of the models I saw were the video iPod or the Nano. Very few older photo iPods, and none of the earlier generations.

    I'd say that the iPod was the dominant music player that I saw (although there were a few portable CD players)

    1. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by gbrandt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I was in Japan I noticed quite a few companies selling white ear-pods in Akahabara. The iPod is such a fad item that people that have other devices will buy the white ear-pods to make it LOOK like they have an iPod.

      Its all about perception in Japan.

      Gregor

    2. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Has anybody used the iTunes Japan service? Perhaps it has lousy selection or something? A lot of the Japanese business climate is still in the "good old boys club". With Apple being something of an outsider, I could see giants like Sony Music Japan giving them the cold shoulder.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine that the iPod is technically any more advanced than other products available on the Japanese market.

      Japan/China/Korea are usually years ahead of the U.S. when it comes to tech.

      Must be the user interface.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      I tried to by some earbuds at a Lawsons (Like a 7-11), and the only ones in stereo were a pair of white Sony earbuds.

      I ordered my nano on the first day it came out (I'd been waiting...), and went about 2 weeks after getting mine -- saw a few other people with them in Japan, too!

    5. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Perhaps it's the user interface, but as the previous poster stated, it's all perception.

      I would agree with that and say that it's the style more so than UI.

    6. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      And the formfactor.
      I've noticed the Japanese like tiny things.

      Perhaps the older larger models were simply too big for comfort in the Japanese market?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      My latest mobile 'phone (Nokia N70) came with with white earphones. Yet another example of a company completely missing the point, as they are very angular and cause pain if worn for more than a few seconds. I would rather have non-white earphones that I can actually keep in my ears (oh, and these have a proprietary connection, so I can't just use my iPod headphones).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by Skrekkur · · Score: 1

      3 things made me fall in love with the pod, huge storage, UI and how small it was compared to that (have a 4th gen).

      The user interface is definetly impressive and since the wheel is patented and yet so utterly better and feels more right than a button driven interface. In light of that I really don't see any players getting bigger than Ipods in the near future, until well maybe someone indroduces an even smarter interface, like thought control :)

    9. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by Mancat · · Score: 1

      When I was in Japan last week, I didn't see this. Therefore, what you have said is not true.

      Same difference?

      --
      hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    10. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, we are very pwoud people with very small penis.

    11. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the I-tunes store only opened in Summer. It seems pretty much similar to the US store. Also, a Mac store opened in Shibuya this summer and it was pretty much crushed all day.

    12. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      The iPod is such a fad item that people that have other devices will buy the white ear-pods to make it LOOK like they have an iPod.

      Its all about perception in Japan.
      You dimwit. Half of the white earbuds on people EVERYWHERE are iPod look-alikes. This is not a Japanese invention.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    13. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you're a shitty racist. Japanese people can't make a w sound like that. If you're going to make fun of how Japanese people talk at least do it right, you bigoted prick.

    14. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With Apple being something of an outsider, I could see giants like Sony Music Japan giving them the cold shoulder.

      They tried. Apple launched without Sony, and shot to the top of the market for downloads in Japan in the first week or so. Some of Sony's muscians were trying to cut their own deals with Apple, so Sony quit their foot-dragging pretty damn quick.

      This was a source of great amusement to everyone who works on the iTMS.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    15. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I think that was actually a quote from South Park. So you can't blame it on the AC.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    16. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Wait? So it IS popular? That would make sense to me given all of the iPods over there. I guess the original poster's sample wasn't big enough.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    17. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by jcr · · Score: 1

      So it IS popular?

      It's the top music-download service in Japan. Music downloads in general aren't as big a proportion of the market in Japan as they are in the USA, but give it a year or so.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    18. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Further, most of the models I saw were the video iPod or the Nano.

      In Japan, having old technology is against the cultural grain. Japanese who can afford it dump and rebuy all electronics yearly to be the coolest on the block.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    19. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by baxissimo · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that Ginza?

    20. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perception is a part of it for a portion of the population, just like it is for any other unstereotyped country.

      ear-pods in Akahabara?

      I think you mean earbuds in Aikihabara. Learn to spell.

    21. Re:I was in Japan last week ... by gogojcp · · Score: 1

      Sovor the irony here: Back in the Betamax days Sony had trouble geting momentum going because the content companies (Disney, Columbia, ...) wouldn't release content on Betamax. Sony dicided that they needed to own the music and movie companies in order to stop this from happening in the future.
      So what happened? Some second rate computer company steals the industry they created (portable music)!! And how does Sony respond to this?
      These are not happy days at Sony.

      --
      Since I only post to counter "groupthink", I EXPECT to be modded down.
  6. I'm confused by rseuhs · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    XBox-Fanboys constantly claim that these evil Japanese racists only buy Japanese products.

    How is that possible?

    1. Re:I'm confused by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      XBox-Fanboys constantly claim that these evil Japanese racists only buy Japanese products.

      People actually say that?

    2. Re:I'm confused by servognome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      XBox-Fanboys constantly claim that these evil Japanese racists only buy Japanese products.
      How is that possible?


      Japanese do exhibit nationalistic pride (it's not racism). It's similar to how many Americans will only buy American cars and trucks.

      iPod style manages overcome the bias, because it is more stylish (which is important to teenagers) than other products. It's cool to own [and wear] an iPod so whether or not it was made in Japan doesn't matter.
      X-box does not share such a cool factor, it's an equivalent to PS2, so nationalism becomes the deciding factor.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:I'm confused by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Japanese do exhibit nationalistic pride (it's not racism).

      It actually is, in many cases. Japanese culture is pretty well steeped with homogeneitic inclinations. "Polluted" people are discriminated against in many areas of life. Read up on the "burakumin."

    4. Re:I'm confused by chris_eineke · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Japanese do exhibit nationalistic pride
      Really?
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    5. Re:I'm confused by NetFu · · Score: 1

      What's the date on that paper in the link? It appears to be 1992-1993, and it definitely seems to contain a lot of old American paranoia about Japan from the early 90's.

      Back then, everybody thought Japan was unstoppable, and would literally take over America. I wrote papers in college back then (around 1989-1991) showing how this was foolish paranoia and how Japanese economic might was nearing the beginning of a drastic decline.

      Looking back over the last 10 years, you'd have to be xenophobic or just plain ignorant to argue otherwise...

    6. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, when I went to the US I was struck by how 90% of the people I was meeting for business were white, and a majority of the people serving in restaurants were black.

      What was really weird is that nobody over there seems to notice anything strange about it.

    7. Re:I'm confused by Oyume · · Score: 1

      While the Japanese DO exhibit some sense of nationalistic pride (and as your said NOT xenophobia), that is NOT the reason they do not buy foreign goods... the truth be told, Japanese goods (on the whole) are better made and last longer. This coming from a US citizen who has lived here in Japan for 6 years now... I simply would NOT pick a US (or Chinese) made product if I had a choice.

      A SECOND factor, which is probably even more important here in Japan, is size. The Japanese not only WANT smaller products (cars, fridgerators, etc), they NEED them! The average apartment / house / road / locker / etc. is very small, especially compared to their US equivalents (sp?). So, of course when a WELL MADE and SMALL product comes along, they snatch it up (ala iPod, Nintendo DS, Sony PSP, etc.)

      And thus the Japanese consumer cycle thrives. ;-)

    8. Re:I'm confused by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      Expanding on this guy: Japan is very small, too. It's 1/2 the US, but in Cali, and with huge mountains

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    9. Re:I'm confused by Haertchen · · Score: 1

      We notice it. It's a lot of what fuels the "Discrimination is still real" talk that floats around, and at some level, they're probably right.

      Part of the problem is that nobody knows exactly what to do about it. We have been trying things (I think that's a large part of what Affirmative Action is about) but change happens slowly no matter what.

      I must also add that what you saw was a snap-shot of race dynamics in the states. What you can't see is how different this is from fifty years ago when the seperation was even more pronounces and firmly established in law and custom.

    10. Re:I'm confused by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      I think the grandparent was being ironic. "Evil racists" pretty much make that clear.

      When asked about the XBOXs failure in Japan, Microsoft spokesmen talk about the "difficulties" in reaching the Japanese market as a foreign company.
      And many Journalists seem to totally buy that, completely ignoring the different tastes and preferences of japanese people.

      I agree with you that a certain national preference is present everywhere.
      To be successful, it isn't enough to just look "ok" compared to the competition and hope you'll somehow catch on. You've got to give customers a real reason why your product is better.

      This is where ipod succeeded and XBOX failed.

    11. Re:I'm confused by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 0

      Have to disagree on this one. The iPod outsells other players in Japan because it is a better MP3 player than others.
      If it would have been the "cool factor" which drives such a large amount of sales, then Apple would be market leader in the OS market instead of Windows.

      As for Japanese choosing an video game system out of nationalistic pride: utter nonsense. The XBox bombed in Japan because it lacked games which appeal to Japanese gamers. By your reasoning the XBox would be more popular than the Playstation in the US because it is an American product.

      Lastly, Japanese buy Japanese cars because they're cheaper. A foreign car, even a little Peugeot 205 is seen as a luxury product and totally cool. Unfortunately most Japanese can't afford them, especially since parts and the compulsory car inspection are extremely expensive.

    12. Re:I'm confused by Jongpil+Yun · · Score: 1

      Yes. All the time. Check out any story about how the Xbox360 bombed @ digg. It's sad, but true.

    13. Re:I'm confused by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It's similar to how many Americans will only buy American cars and trucks.

      Interesting - is the PS2 made in Japan? I assumed it would have been made in China like everything else.

      I bought a Subaru because it was made in Indiana. My Chevy truck was made in Canada. The Subaru is more reliable (and can pull the Chevy out of a ditch).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    14. Re:I'm confused by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The iPod outsells other players in Japan because it is a better MP3 player than others. If it would have been the "cool factor" which drives such a large amount of sales, then Apple would be market leader in the OS market instead of Windows.

      ergo, Windows is better than OSX?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    15. Re:I'm confused by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 1

      Ergo, the cool factor doesn't count.

  7. Just think... by Private+Taco · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...how well a Hello Kitty version would sell... e.a.e.

    --
    If I could, I'd destroy you all.
  8. Didn't Understand the Hype by dgb2n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Until I owned one.

    I've owned at least 6 or 7 different non-IPOD players including RIO's, RCA's, hard drive, flash based, you name it.

    My wife bought me a Video Ipod this year and I was skeptical. "Why not save the $50 and get a non-Apple one.". After less than 3 months, I like it so well, I'm ready to trade her Rio Carbon in for a Nano just because its so easy to use. I generally consider myself tech savy (using Linux since 1997) but the interface just seems so slick, so smooth, so simple to use with one hand that I can't get over it. Just the fact that you can rate songs as you play them and have that transferred back into Itunes seemed to represent a higher level of integration (seamlessness) than I saw with any other player and client-side software combination.

    Want to fast forward though a song? No problem. Couple of intuitive ways to do it. Love the album art. I used to download podcasts with a non-Itunes client and download to my other players. Completely simple with Itunes and the Ipod.

    I'm not suprised. Apple just got it right.

    1. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch this astroturfer get modded up.

    2. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by thesupermikey · · Score: 1

      damn straight man,

      other than itunes being a kinda crappy program, the ipod really is the best thing out there. The rage of options/sizes/such really make it aa great music player.

      Do lots of peopl my them because the are the 'it' thing. Yes. But they are the 'it ' thing because the are really good at what they do.

      --
      Mikey
      I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
    3. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Hey, free karma's free karma, don't you be jealous

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    4. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by tji · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Watch this astroturfer get modded up.

      Yeah, right.. because it's not possible that something was actually designed well, and has a much better user interface than the competition.. Do you only believe negative reviews?

      I'm in much the same position as the original poster, I bought a cheap MP3 player, then later moved to an iPod. The difference is night and day, Apple did it right.. Not only the iPod user interface, which is good, but the iTunes application for managing your music is leaps and bounds better than the alternatives.

      I'm also a longtime Linux user. But, I moved from Linux on a Thinkpad to MacOS on a PowerBook for similar reasons. MacOS is just well done, as are the included apps, while still giving me the normal Unix capabilities under the hood.

      And on the astroturf thing -- an "astroturfer" would be a newly created user account to be thrown away, or an AC, not an account created ~6 years ago (5 digit uid).

    5. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe you fell for it. I'm surprised the troll didn't get modded down faster than the astroturfer got modded up.

    6. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by milimetric · · Score: 1

      3 months eh? Wait a few more months. Buy a few more iPods. You'll see their quality control is surprisingly bad. I've had two go bad on me and all five of my iPod owning friends have had their iPods crash, go dead or just plain act funny. It's not reliable hardware, just like every other hardware out there except of course for things like the IBM ThinkPad business series laptops. You're right though, great interface, and I agree, they're better than the rest.

    7. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by hhawk · · Score: 1

      They got it right 3 or 4 ways.

      #1 They have last mover advantage; they didn't try to create a new market just tried to do a better job.
      #2 It's priced to make them money; they aren't giving them away meaning it's healthy for them
      #3 Because they are actually selling music over time as that makes more money they can afford at some point lower margins on the pods

      This means #4, that in Japan or any place else, if people only buy the pods that's ok. If people download thats ok too.

      One thing that I had problems with was I didn't know I could get iTunes and sign up and not actually own an IPOD. I have no Pod and no competive product. I just run iTunes on my PC and download mostly video, some tunes and the free songs they offer!

      so ok, 5 ways..
      #5 it works as software only! it's great on MY PC :)

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
    8. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      You'll see their quality control is surprisingly bad.

      I guess they really are the BMW of mp3 players.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    9. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by stekylsha · · Score: 1

      That's really strange because none of my friends have any problems at all. I had a mini before my 5G video and both work flawlessly. Of my friends who have iPods, the only problem any of them has had is with the battery in a 1G mini, which anyone who reads slashdot knows sucked cupcakes.

      I did have problems with my iTrip causing some funkiness with my mini but when it was removed the mini worked fine.

      What generation were the iPods that went bad? Maybe it was just a bad lot; it's happened before ...

      --
      "There is no spoon." - Neo
      "Spoooon!" - The Tick
    10. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I've had a 4g since they were released, actually dumb luck got me one on THE day the first ones came in.. and the only problems I've had were because I was using outdated firmware.

      My 5g had the 1.1 video skipping issue, but I downgraded and it works fine. And that's a software issue, not hardware.

      I've dropped my 4g 5-6 times from eye level to hard tile floor while walking and it never had any problems related to physical damage..

      In my opinion, it's a sturdy well built thing.. and except for it looking like I keep it in my dryer with a steel wool pad, it's as good as new.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    11. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      between ma and the office folk, we have 3 nanos and 2 shuffles. min freaked out once cuz I unplugged it while it was mounted. nobody else had any problems. my boss' is scratched to hell, but hey, this is a rough workplace....

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    12. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've owned at least 6 or 7 different non-IPOD players including RIO's, RCA's, hard drive, flash based, you name it.

      My wife bought me a Video Ipod this year and I was skeptical. "Why not save the $50 and get a non-Apple one.". After less than 3 months, I like it so well, I'm ready to trade her Rio Carbon in for a Nano just because its so easy to use. I generally consider myself tech savy (using Linux since 1997) but the interface just seems so slick, so smooth, so simple to use with one hand that I can't get over it. Just the fact that you can rate songs as you play them and have that transferred back into Itunes seemed to represent a higher level of integration (seamlessness) than I saw with any other player and client-side software combination.


      One problem with this argument is that you're comparing a brand new player to a bunch of older ones. Song ratings and album art, for example, are relatively new features. Nobody had them when the Rio Carbon came out, for instance, whereas some other players do have them now (the Zen Vision:M, for instance).

      Here's the other problem. We all know that the iPod's software interface is very similar to any number of Creative players (see lawsuit :). A circular touchpad is brilliant when you have to scroll through a long list of songs, less brilliant when you're off by one item on the menu. You can still move one item at a time of course, but a button, tappable region, or a Dell-style wheel is easier. iTunes integration is nice, but what if you don't want to use iTunes? The iTunes store is nice, but why if you have good headphones and would like your music in a lossless codec, or at least encoded at more than 128kbps? (Yes, I know AAC sounds better than an MP3 at the same bit rate, but some of us encode our MP3s at 256k.)

      Meanwhile, basic features like an equalizer and drag-and-drop adding of music are missing. Syncing to two computers? Nope. Not that every other player has those either, and not that the iPod is hardly lacking in features. But surely nobody who has any sense that other players have things which the iPod lacks would say it's the perfect player or anything, right?

      I'm not suprised. Apple just got it right.

      And then you said exactly that. See, _this_ is why you got accused of astroturfing. It doesn't even have an EQ and Apple got it "just right"? Nope. "Just right" means right for everybody, e.g. perfect. The iPod isn't right for everybody, but certain people to tend to make overarching statements like that, which is why some people hate them :). Sure the iPod is a good player. It's great for a lot of people. But "just right"? If I want a wide variety of music codecs, really good video playback, or an EQ/FM radio/gapless playback/tough hard-to-scratch outer casing/add random feature which the iPod doesn't have... then it's not "just right" for me, is it? Thus from my point of view, you sound like a fanatic or an astroturfer.

      Consider this: if there is even one player out there which is the "equal" of the iPod, then you have to ask yourself why the iPod is so popular. Now, you've owned "at least 6 or 7" other players, but there are _thousands_ of them out there (mostly cheapie flash players, but there are at least dozens of HD-based players). What are the odds that you've hit on that one?

      'Cause you know, I look at a review site like www.dapreview.net and they've got a fairly long list of "favorite" players, including some iPods but many non-iPods as well. Why do I get the feeling that they know more than you? Why do I get the feeling that you know less than you're willing to admit? Think about it.

    13. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya - I used to have an Archos, but the thing was miserable for skipping around my various playlists. I didn't like the interface at all, either. Really, it was almost a chore to use the thing, with the way I like to listen to music (parts of songs, some songs multiple times, skipping around, etc)

      Then I got an iPod (5G, 60gig since I get a yummy student discount) and I'm incredibly happy with it. I thought people talking about the advantage of the scroll wheel were just being fanboys - but it really is just a LOT easier to use. And the software is pretty sweet, from a playlist management perspective! Ratings based playlists are awesome. It is a much better player for my type of listening.

      If a person is the sort who just plonks everything onto their device and then just lets it go - not a song surfer - then yeah, sure, use whatever player. But if a person wants to have more flexibility, an iPod is likely the best choice at this point.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    14. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You already have iTunes and love it. Go ahead. Drink the poison. Get an iPod. Trust me, you won't regret it.

    15. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by clu76 · · Score: 1

      I'm approaching three years with mine. Not a problem, yet.

      --
      the cosmos in 20 words or less: thumbuki.com
    16. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by superflyguy · · Score: 1

      Whether it's right for everybody wasn't the point. If they fulfilled their goal of having the product appeal to a huge audience, they got it right. They "just got it right" by creating a balanced set of features that appeal to a large number of people. Not by being the best product for every single person, but by being the best product to compete on the market.

      And even if you do try to alter the connotation by rephrasing from "just got it right" to "got it just right", the same explainations still apply.

    17. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by Baki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an iPod and keep trying each new version of itunes, hoping that one day i'll like it.
      However, until now, I love my iPod but cannot stand itunes. Instead I use jriver media center, which also has excellent ipod and podcast support. It is much more versatile and advanced than itunes, however it is not free. It can handle huge libraries (I have almost 100'000 tracks on a remote disk) very well and fast.
      itunes just can't copy with that.

    18. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by Castar · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are several features that the iPod is still missing. They're the reason I haven't gotten one. One is Ogg playback, just because I have a lot of music in Ogg. That's forgivable, and I can transcode if need be. However, the other one is simply unacceptable, and that's the lack of gapless playback. Workarounds like encoding all my music as one file are also unacceptable. I need true gapless playback for files that support it.

      However, I might soon be buying an iPod, since the fine folks over at RockBox are busy porting their firmware over: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/IpodPor t

      That will solve the gapless issue and hopefully the Ogg issue, too. It'll also add a whole lot of cool features... When they finish that project, I might finally buy an iPod.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    19. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      And on the astroturf thing -- an "astroturfer" would be a newly created user account to be thrown away, or an AC, not an account created ~6 years ago (5 digit uid).

      astroturfing would be redundant for Google or iPod stories.

    20. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Dude, you've already posted in this story (and other Apple stories); we get it, you hate Apple and the iPod. You're a teeny, tiny minority with a chip on your shoulder.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    21. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      What-the-fuck-ever. Arstechnica threw their nano onto the street and drove over the damn thing with a car, and it still kept playing.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    22. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by sindreengen · · Score: 1

      funny when people call themself "tech savy (using Linux since 1997)"
      I've been using linux since then, and I dont know shit :)
      what the flying fuck does that have to do with anything !

      ps. sorry for the bad english,I've been drinking
      pps. and what does that have to do with anything, wasnt it then they got the nifty, semigraphical user interface :p

    23. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by dgb2n · · Score: 1

      Thanks tji. Very astute to notice the slashdot number. It might have been a bit longer ago than that.

      I wholeheartedly admit that the "tech savy" line was a bit cheesy but I was looking for a way to say that I'm that nerd everyone else goes to for tech support. Electronic stuff and computers come natural for me, despite the fact that I turn 40 this year and grew up mostly before PC's (first college CS class was with punch cards, really).

      I can mess with other players and have done so. There's just something awfully smooth about the IPOD and the level of integration with Itunes. Its a no brainer.

      Not that I don't have a brain, just that its nice not to have to engage it for my music player.

    24. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by dgb2n · · Score: 1

      I thought about it. You're correct that they didn't get it right for everyone.

      They did, however, just get it right for me. And a substantial number of others based on the percentage of the market that they control.

      Could I have been more exact in my wording? Sure.

      Does that make my observations any less astute or valuable? Nope. Just doing what people do on Slashdot, share their opinions. For the record, I've owned:

      1. Rio 500
      2. Some Nomad-based player I forget the name of.
      3. RCA Lyra 1070
      4. RCA Lyra 1080B
      5. RCA Lyra 2840 (40gb player)
      6. Rio Carbon (5GB)

      And now an Ipod Video 30GB.

      I know that the list doesn't include many of the more popular Iriver products out there and alot of the newer players. Bottom line FOR ME is that there is a certain, even intangible, ease to the Ipod interface and integration with Itunes that I find unique in the set of players available.

    25. Re:Didn't Understand the Hype by milimetric · · Score: 1

      of the ones that went bad, I witnessed personally 3 nanos and 3 20GB iPods

  9. do cellphones count ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    because everybody in Japan i know uses their cell as a media player, iPods where great last year but things move fast, the JP user doesnt want to carry backpacks and batman belts like the Americans

    JD

  10. right by danielk1982 · · Score: 1

    This should destroy the myth that Japanese only buy japanese.

    1. Re:right by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Where is the iPod made?

      Japan or China?

      (heh - I wouldn't even ask if it's in the USA :-))

    2. Re:right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the chips that power the IPOD are made in the USA. Heck, if you own a Japanese HDTV you will find that inside, American designed and manufactured chips are running it.

    3. Re:right by kevinl · · Score: 1

      They're manufactured in China. If you order directly from Apple, you can follow the FedEx tracking from the factory to your door.

      I imagine the presonalized laser engraving is one motivation for this. Build it, engrave it, package it, and ship it, all from one place. Slick.

    4. Re:right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Cept there's still plenty of things that bolster it.

    5. Re:right by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Who cares where it's assembled? Not your average consumer. Where it's designed is a bit more important. That's in California.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  11. I for one find this surprising... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Japan is a culture that has been historically known for being very group centric, and supportive of the group which they are part of. Them choosing a foreign product over a local product is thus surprising to me. I assumed the fact that the XBox was foreign was the main reason it never took off in Japan. Then again, it was more or less a "PS2 without Japanese games" when you look at the big picture of consoles at the time, so that may be he reason for it's bad sales. I'm guessing the popularity of the iPod is due to the younger generation breaking off from the ideals of the older generation, and willing to buy an interesting product even if it is foreign. Even today Japan is going through big changes in terms of the position of women in society and external influence.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    1. Re:I for one find this surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Them choosing a foreign product over a local product is thus surprising to me. I assumed the fact that the XBox was foreign was the main reason it never took off in Japan.

      I think the fact that the games available are very un-Japanese has something to do with it. They like RPGs.

    2. Re:I for one find this surprising... by masklinn · · Score: 1

      They like RPGs.

      And datesims, and eroge/H-games.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:I for one find this surprising... by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are plenty of extremely popular foreign brands in Japan, from low-end (McDonalds, Coca Cola) to luxury (Louis Vuitton, Prada). It's a tough market, but not at all unprecedented to break into.

    4. Re:I for one find this surprising... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      True. But typically if they have a very similar alternative that when you get down to it has almost no functional difference, it seems they have choosen their variant (Often electronics). Take an mp3 player for example. When you get down to it, they are pretty similar. They have different sizes, capacities, and sound quality, but among the basic traits, most large manufacturers sell a model that is basically the same as a competing model other than interface, casing, support, build quality, and stuff like that. Yes, there are some big variations between mp3 players (format support for example), but in general, these big variations are either not something most of their consumers are interested in, or something their competitors will eventually incorporate in one way or another. I guess that's probably why a brand being called high quality is such a good thing, because it's the most important feature that is individual to each device. Makes me kinda wonder why I spend so much time researching my purchases.........

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    5. Re:I for one find this surprising... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I think your post touches on one difference between the U.S. and the Japanese market - Americans will tend towards a "more X for my money" approach, where X is a quantifiable variable like size, processor power, or horsepower and ignore unquantifiables like aesthetics and 'feel', whereas the Japanese will take an approach that emphasizes the unquatifiable feel or usability of a device, and less on getting "more" of whatever is being sold.

      Take your assertion that: most large manufacturers sell a model that is basically the same as a competing model other than interface, casing, support, build quality, and stuff like that.

      Most Japanese will look at that and think, "you mean, the same except for everything that matters". It's like saying, "A croissant and a bagel are the same thing, just cooked differently"

      Also, there is a tendency in America to think that "there is no such thing as too much of a good thing", so you buy things in huge portions or sizes because you're "getting more from your money", even if you don't use it all. In Japan on the other hand, there is a cultural assumption that the smaller something is, the better made it must be, because it takes skill or artistry to shrink something down, but it takes only resources to make something bigger.

      And that's just setting aside the fact that Apple are masters of marketing and design, and Microsoft are not noted for either, and mishandled the Japanese Xbox release even by their own standards.

    6. Re:I for one find this surprising... by LilHapaGirl · · Score: 1

      even non-luxury brands like The Gap are super popular there. So popular in fact that they have their own cheaper version of The Gap that sells cheap knock off styles. There's a big market for foreign goods there as long as there is some kind of IMAGE associated with it. Japaense people are very image conscious and I think that more than anything apple sells their image really well. I was in Japan when Apple was bombarding it with ipod ads. The entire harajuku train station and the whole yamanote line was a series of ipod ads and familiarity does breed good feelings = people buy it = all the cool kids have one = you have to get one too.

    7. Re:I for one find this surprising... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      You seem somewhat knowledgable about Japan. That is very true. America wants bang for the buck. Japan wants good quality at higher expense. It's the reason why you don't see too many junkers on the roads in Japan. I also remember reading somewhere (not sure if this article touched on it) that the shuffle was the most popular music player in Japan, not the bulky HD based ones like here in the US. From what I've learned (from a native Japanese teacher), Japan is a very unique country, and their tastes and thoughts are harder to understand as an American then one might think. I just don't understand why Sony == quality to them (Natives I know have said this, although it may not go for most of Japan). I've seen Sony products act up and have worse warranties then a lot of other manufacturers. But then again, the same could be said about many Apple products, yet they are known for their quality.

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    8. Re:I for one find this surprising... by kklein · · Score: 1

      Ugh, I don't even know where to start with this thread.

      I live in Japan, speak Japanese (have taught Japanese at the university level in the US), and have a Japanese wife, in-laws, the whole shebang.

      The problem of talking about a foreign culture is always that you tend to get the basic facts down, but completely mis-interpret the reasons behind them. In the case of Japan, a lot of things get chalked up to "the mysterious Japanese," an image that they have not in any way tried to combat (it works in their favor more often than not). But there are some good, solid reasons for what happens here in terms of what products people buy.

      Size. Yes, small things here do better. But I don't think it has anything to do with all that orientalist craftsmanship crap the grandparent was on about. Have you SEEN a Japanese house? I live in one (okay, a flat--but so do most people in their 30s, if they are living away from the family), and in my case, I have recently been thinking of ditching my beloved CRT for a godawful LCD just to free up that extra 20cm behind my desk. That would make a HUGE difference to my office. That tiny bit of space would not even be noticable in even the smallest apartment I ever lived in in the US. So why do people buy small? BECAUSE THERE'S NOWHERE TO PUT ANYTHING.

      Also, Japan, being a civilised nation, unlike the US in this regard, uses the public transportation system. When you have to carry everything you are going to want or need all day, and don't want to look like an Akiba-kei (Akihabara dork), you need that stuff to be small. Really really small. Since I AM a bit of an Akiba-kei, I still happily port my big iPod around, but since I don't want to look like one, I put it in a Jean Paul Gaultier briefcase/bag.

      In the specific case of iPods, the other thing you need to remember is that my rather average CD collection of 300 or so CDs usually elicits gasps of shock and awe from my Japanese friends. People don't buy a lot of music, on average, here. Granted, my musician friends have lots of CDs, but "normal" people have like... 10. Seriously. And the reason for that is that CDs can cost as much as $40 here. The reason for THAT is... I don't know. So there's no point in getting a 30GB ipod when you can fit every song you own on less than a gig. (The Nano sells because it's cute.)

      The reason you don't see "junkers" on the road is that it's illegal to drive them. There is a system here (put in place by cronies of the automotive industry in the name of "safety") where you have to get your car re-certified every 2 years (it goes down to every year with older cars). This is extremely expensive, because it basically entails replacing everything that can be replaced on it all at once, whether it needs it or not. A brand-new car goes 3 years before you have to get it checked. So guess what? A lot of people drive new cars. Used cars, not surprisingly, are quite inexpensive, which is nice when you are buying, but heartrending when you want to sell (our 1999 Opel is currently worth $500, and we were told it will go to 0 next year--It's paid off, thank God).

      The electronics companies are trying to get in on this same deal with some ridiculous legislation that is to make it illegal to sell any electronic item over 5 years old.

      Despite all this, Costco, of all companies, has been doing quite well. We see people walking out just like in the US, with more croutons than they will ever be able to eat. So perhaps the poor economy is shaking things up. But in the case of foodstuffs from Costco, the people are having to buy deep-freezes to keep everything--and lord knows where they are putting them.

      Finally, the idea that Japanese only buy Japanese is from the 80s, when there were predatory tariffs in place. Japanese buy what they expect to be of high quality (yes, they are more interested in quality than Americans--and thank god for that), regardless of who made it. Right now, I am typing on my company-issued Dell (laptop--re

    9. Re:I for one find this surprising... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      Informative post from a local. You make the average Japanese house sound like a hotel room in size (which I am living in right now since my university owns it, so I understand the situation). I will admit I know practically nothing about Japan's economy, and that was an assumtion I made that appears to have been wrong (although I'm hoping the rest I said was fairly accurate). I thought there might have also been laws that forced junkers off the road, but I wasn't sure. How was it adapting to the culture? Assuming your not native (which it sounded like you aren't), I would think it would have been pretty difficult at first getting used to the honorifics system and their lack of direct communication with many topics (I was told a direct "no" is rarely used). I won't even get started in the US mentallity being mostly "me me me" and the Japanese mentality at least seeming like "you you you" on the outside in all but the most personal situations. And also, is the Japanese mindset really more focused as being part of a whole (be it a family, country, or company) in comparison of the US mindset of individuality? I'd be interested to hear a perspective from someone other then my sensei (native).

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    10. Re:I for one find this surprising... by kklein · · Score: 1

      No offense, but there you go again. Granted, I'm sure your sensei has told you a lot of things which get filed away as "facts," but that right there is the problem (remember what I said about Japanese people doing little to combat the "mysterious Japanese" image?). I remember the first time I came here as an exchange student. My teacher loaded me up with so many of these "facts" I spent the first 6 months terrified I was going to upset something or break some rule and bring a thousand years of shame upon someone's dead relatives or something.

      Nothing is that dire.

      The thing you have to remember is the same thing I said in my last post, and the same thing I've used in dealing with all the various nationalities I deal with in my job: People are essentially the same. They have different customs and cultures, but as long as you avoid the big no-nos (when you're having your Saudi friends over for a BBQ, don't serve pork and check if they are the "no alcohol" type or the "if the iman asks, there was no alcohol" type), people will work with you and you'll be fine. All these little "facts" do is make the situation difficult. Be humble, be soft, be kind and you will rarely run into trouble. Stick to the Platinum Rule: Do unto others as they would like to be done... unto... That sounded better in my head...

      One of the big differences I found in having a native Japanese Japanese language teacher and a non-native is that, especially at the beginning, the non-natives were more useful. They not only explain difficult bits of grammar better, they offer better advice on getting along with people in the target culture. Quick! What are Americans like??? It's almost impossible to describe one's own culture, because it is a huge part of WHO YOU ARE, and what's YOU and what's YOUR CULTURE is very hard to distinguish. Now, speaking from experience, when you ARE teaching your own native language, people are going to press you to answer these questions. I typically refuse flat-out. I'll tell people what we do, but if they want to know why, I don't give them a great big cultural answer; I give them the most mundane answer I can think of, if anything at all.

      My apartment is bigger than a hotel room! Sheesh. It's about 500 square feet, I think. We measure space in terms of tatami mats here. They are basically standard (well, ones used in apartments are) so if someone tells you that they have 2 6-jo (the counter for mats) rooms and a 4.5-jo room (like the one I'm typing now), you know not only how big that is, but also what shape it is. It's so much more useful than square footage. I live in a 3DK. Three rooms and a dining/kitchen area (plus bath/toilet area and genkan and balcony). It's nice.

      When you say "honorifics system," do you mean the linguistic one (keigo) or the cultural one? If it's the former, about the only place I use that is at the bank or hotels or other such sort of expensive service industry area, and its receptive. I hate it and even though I know people are required to use it for their job, I sometimes say "I'm sorry, but keigo is very hard to follow for me; could we just switch to -masu/desu form?" It usually doesn't work. I also use it sometimes on the phone when I'm making a business call, but really, keigo (as in the "high" keigo with the different verb conjugations) seems to be dying out.

      As for the "cultural" honorific system, here's an easy way to deal with it: Be especially polite and deferential to anyone who outranks you at work. Gee... Sounds quite a bit like what we do in the West, too, right? It really isn't that hard. Be polite to people older than you. (again, no big differences there) Be polite to people you don't know and at whom you are not angry (because they just shook their umbrella out all over you, in which case it is ALWAYS better to take them to task in English because sounding scary in a foreign language usually just makes people laugh). It's really not as hard as your teacher and textbooks probably make it

    11. Re:I for one find this surprising... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the lengthy response. I've been curious as to how in practice a lot of what I have been taught is in Japan (at least from a gaijins perspective). I guess that's probably part of how I was taught. My teacher taught us with the intention of us looking at the Japanese from a Japanese perspective, so there are probably a lot of things that a foreigner would inevitibly see different (as you have). I guess the place it seems would be most difficult would some business and traditional (such as tea ceramony) settings. As you've said, the linguistic honorifics are difficult. I've been taught they are something considered very useful in Japanese culture, and even the Japanese don't always master it (I'm relating it to public speaking). Thanks again. I hope to go to Japan someday, and it's nice to know it isn't as bad as it seems.

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  12. *** Leans back, waits *** by Slash+Veteran · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Great, I can't wait to see what stuff these crazy gookers come up with to do with their IPods...upskirt videos, bukkake, selling used panties from vending machines, what will they come up with next? I guarantee there will be some depraved IPod kinky fetish in the not so distant future, and for that I say: yes, you crazy Japanese, I salute you! (and please post pics)

  13. Re:bring on the fanboy tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You know, there too many Apple fanboy stories.

    It's all of those left-wing Fags that are on this site. Or is it Right-wing? Oh wait, it's the Muslims! No, it's the arrogant F/OSS Son-of-A-Bitches! That's it! Like jedidiah(1196)!

  14. iPod taking Japan by storm, huh? by mcsestretch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just wait until Godzilla gets back from his battle with Mothra.
    It'll beat back this iPod invasion.

    1. Re:iPod taking Japan by storm, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had MOD points left over, it would be modded funny, as im walking out the door snickering like a little boy who just seen breasts for the first time.

    2. Re:iPod taking Japan by storm, huh? by pointNumberOne · · Score: 1

      Didn't you catch the superbowl? 'Zilla's a family man now... Settled down, made love to a robot, no time for wreaking havoc anymore.

  15. iPod vs PDA by VeryHotTopic · · Score: 1

    Funny thing is: the iPod isn't anywhere near as powerful as the pda. Basically, the iPod works because the form factor is attractive and Apple streamlines the content better than anyone else. Whereas with the pda, there's no *really* easy way for the user to get content. I like to hear of Japan embracing American technology. More often than not, it's the other way around. Or at least that's my perspective.

    1. Re:iPod vs PDA by VeryHotTopic · · Score: 1

      Toyotas are great and so are Hondas! I especially like the Hybrids.

    2. Re:iPod vs PDA by masklinn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is anyone but Lada actually behind American automotive companies?

      Hell, I'm not even sure Lada's still behind.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:iPod vs PDA by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      It's really Chinese technology. We just write the software :)

    4. Re:iPod vs PDA by gnovos · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm not even sure Lada's still behind.

      Waaaaaaaay back there somewhere...

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    5. Re:iPod vs PDA by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I love my Honda... it was built in East Liberty, Ohio.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  16. Obviousry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The Japanese people just got rerry sick of the frash-based prayers. Plus they can downroad music easery from iTunes. Once iTunes raunched in Japan, it was arr just a matter of time before it's poprurarity soared .

    1. Re:Obviousry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg teh funnay, +1 billion

  17. iPod not Xbox 360 by hchaput · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Slightly off topic, but I wonder... Will this finally put an end to the theory that the Xbox 360 bombed in Japan because the Japanese are faithful to Sony? As if baseball wasn't proof enough of Japan's willingness (eagerness) to embrace western culture.

    Maybe the trend here is that Japan doesn't like big, brawny electronics. Perhaps they like simple, cute, almost frivolous electronics. Less is more!

    1. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      There is a post above that explains this.

      http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=178465&c id=14796604

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    2. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
      It's more than the fact that it's cute, simple electronics.

      Apple as a brand can be more associated with fashion and it's social status of that brand recognition. Japan is not completely xenophobic when it comes to fashionable items. Wanna know what brand names are also highly sought after in Japan? Prada. Gucci. Louis Vuitton.

      Apple is a fashionable product. 10 dollars says that the Ipod is real popular amongst mid to late teenage girls in Japan. Woah, it's also highly sought after by the same demographic in the US? It's more than the fact that it's 'a really good mp3 player' that makes that type of impact. The target demographic of people won't get excited because they own a Sony mp3 player. They don't even get excited that they own an mp3 player, they get excited that they own an Apple product

      The reason why the xbox360 has no impact is because there is no 'social status' to gain from posessing one (also prolly that lack of games japanese people prefer prolly matters as well). An xbox360 is no Mercedes Benz. OR an Ipod.

      Image matters. And apple's got it.

      I wonder if the ipod costs the same in japan as it does in the US. If there is any social status to gain from owning an ipod, it can probably command a pretty penny (or yen in this case).

    3. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      Maybe the trend here is that Japan doesn't like big, brawny electronics. Perhaps they like simple, cute, almost frivolous electronics.

      Or maybe Japan is made up of millions of individuals who have their own preferences and favorites, and make their purchasing decisions based on those rather than what THE COUNTRY does? Although the furthest "East" I've been is Amsterdam, so maybe I'm just not getting their culture.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    4. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This thread has both the MS apologist and the denegrating comments stating Apple is just a fashion with little technical competence.

      The reality is likely to be more complex. There is almost always a nationalistic pride for localy produced products. And even though almost all electronics are produced in Asia, the branding issue is still very real. But at the heart a good product can always compete, and a good product is not just about fashion, but also the amount of money a person is willing to pay for the product.

      For instance a real Prada bag will last a lifetime, while the cheap nylon ones will start to shread quickly. It may not be worth $400 dollars to you to own such a bag, but the quality difference is real. There was a story of Enzo Ferrari that was totaled in the Malibu accident. Car cost 1.2 million. The driver hit at 150+ miles per hour and the occupant(s) suvived. The car was not just about a name. One pays for safety.

      So stating the issue is just about style, or just about nationality is a cop out. Sure, to compete in another country one has to be much better, but one can always build a better mousetrap. of course it is easier to just build the same old crap and then complain, but that is not the issue. The iPod is a well made product that has been able to compete. The xBox does not really have anything the consumer finds compelling, and mostly succeeds in the US because it is MS, an name that Americans trust. OTOH, I do not see the powerbooks competing in Japan because the Sony laptops are by many measures better machines. This is reality. Complaining that the Japanese are not buying Powerbooks when Apple is not competing with Sony, at least on that level, would be silly.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason why the xbox360 has no impact is because there is no 'social status' to gain from posessing one (also prolly that lack of games japanese people prefer prolly matters as well). An xbox360 is no Mercedes Benz. OR an Ipod.

      Exactly, iPod wins because of fashion and status. iPods are not displacing MP3 players in Japan. They are replacing minidisc players, which were the popular and fashionable status symbol.

    6. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by pilkul · · Score: 1

      It's possible to make meaningful generalizations based on what the majority of a population does, without claiming to represent every single person in the country.

    7. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      That's a very American attitude, sir.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    8. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      I was given an original Japanese Xbox and kept it for a little while without really playing it that much. One day, I wanted to watch a DVD, so I put it into the Xbox. Everything worked out once I found the batteries for the remote (that you need them to get the DVD working at all is another rant). However, suddenly I noticed something odd: When you press play, on the top of the screen it says "Play." It doesn't say saisei or katakanaized purei, but straight up, using roman letters "Play." The same for fast forward and rewind. To me, this seemed emblematic of MS's failure to properly localize its product. It's true that Japanese people know a lot of the English words for consumer product related thing, but this just struck me as laziness on MS's part.

      Another story: this weekend, I was at Japanese Toys'R'Us, and I decided to play with their 360. I tried out Kong, and it looked pretty good to start with, but before long I was kind of stuck. The screen was really dark, and I couldn't tell where I was or what was going on. Then I remembered a story I saw on Slashdot: Kong is too dark on conventional, non-HD TVs because the devs didn't think to test it properly. Now, I'm not sure of all the details, but I'm pretty sure that Japan's version of HD is significantly different from the American version. (It came out before the US version, but never really caught on, I think.) Anyhow, that is probably related to why even though the screen for the demo machine looked pretty sharp, Kong was unplayably dark.

    9. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by mikael · · Score: 1

      More likely, there weren't any game titles that were on the "must have" list for Japanese. I'm guessing these would be games like "Pokemon", "Super Mario", "Final Fantasy", etc...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by pilkul · · Score: 1

      What makes you so sure I'm an American? Anyway, Japanese people themselves frequently make generalizations about their own culture.

    11. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      What makes you so sure I'm an American?

      Because Americans are the kind of people who make blanket stereotypes. (I hope you see the irony/point I am making here. It's easy to generalize others, but not so much fun when you're the target of the generalizations. Now I'm not saying I'm holier than thou, as I stereotype with the best of 'em, being American and all.)

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    12. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by pilkul · · Score: 1

      My point was precisely that you can stereotype without being "blanket" about it.

    13. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      (Have to add this filler to make the /. gods happy...)

      That's a very American attitude, sir.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    14. Re:iPod not Xbox 360 by Westacular · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apple laptops are quite popular in Japan. The Mac's marketshare has been consistently higher in Japan than in the US for the better part of a decade.

      I wouldn't really say Sony's laptops are better, they have their own faults that generally offset the smaller! faster! advantages.

  18. Its the battery by danielk1982 · · Score: 1

    If my Palm could pull 8-10 hours of music off a single charge I'd dump my mp3 player (one less thing to carry around). My iRiver gives me 20 hours with 1 AA. No PDA can match that.

    1. Re:Its the battery by VeryHotTopic · · Score: 1

      You're right. Battery charge is an issue too. Wouldn't it be great if a PDA had the advantages of the iPod? In the end, it looks like the iPod will be more and more like a PDA.

    2. Re:Its the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, it's the battery, well that and the fact that my PDA didn't come with a 20GB Hard Drive...

  19. Same Thing We Do Every Night, Pinky by signed.bewildered · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we need a Naruto SE with all episodes loaded. My kids would NEVER speak out loud again.

    1. Re:Same Thing We Do Every Night, Pinky by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Now we need a Naruto SE with all episodes loaded. My kids would NEVER speak out loud again.

      Hmmmm ... make it also have Inu Yasha and Ghost in the Shell:SAC, some Cowboy Bebop, and Gundam Seedm and I'll never speak out loud again except for the initial squeels of delight.

      We're talking Anime here!! =)

      Hmmm ... come to think of it ... I've got a few new episodes of Naruto on the PVR to watch tonight. Yay!
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Same Thing We Do Every Night, Pinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU, 'tardboy.

  20. I know by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 0

    I know, it makes the sony walkman look like a Paleolithic finger tapping...

  21. It's the Japanese iPod commercials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Japanese iPod Jingle: Happy Techie iPods! Make a man out of a mouse! Happy Techie iPods! Make you bust out of your blouse! Wear them all the time! Let them blow your mind...ohh! Happy Techie iPods!

    Thanks Joss.

  22. One way to look at it by TheBogie · · Score: 2, Funny
    There is another way to spin the data that iPod has 51% market share in Japan. It has an 82% market share here in the US. This article could just as easily have been titled:

    Apple market share slips 30% in Japan

    1. Re:One way to look at it by SithLordOfLanc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That statement would imply that they once had an 80% market share in Japan. It seems that the article is suggesting that the market share in increasing.

    2. Re:One way to look at it by TheBogie · · Score: 0, Troll
      You are correct, that statement would be misleading. But the phrase "iPod Takes Japan by Storm" suggests that the iPod is crushing the competition in Japan. With a 51% market share I wouldn't call it a "storm", especially in light of it's dominance here in USA.

      With that said, I do think the iPod is one of the best products to come out in many many years. One day it may even have 80% market share in Japan!

    3. Re:One way to look at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the phrase "iPod Takes Japan by Storm" suggests that the iPod is crushing the competition in Japan. With a 51% market share I wouldn't call it a "storm"

      perhaps not, except that the 2nd place contender, sony, has 16.2%. i'd say outpacing your next competitor by a factor of over 3:1 isn't doing too badly, and an increase in market share from 32% to 51% is at least a drizzle, if not exactly a storm.

    4. Re:One way to look at it by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      A 51% market share for one product is taking Japan by storm. Maybe you should take a look at the market share figures of all the competitors sometime, who together equal 49% compared to Apple owning half the market to just themselves.

      Claiming the title could have been renamed "iPod slips in Japan" is just stupid; for it to have slipped requires it to have achieved a higher amount in Japan and then dropped. iPods just came out last year and already have half the market.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  23. In Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American electronics company making good in Japan is news.

    It's man bites dog, not dog bites man.

    1. Re:In Japan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! That's the Koreans, you racist.

  24. Tokyo Apple Store by rlp · · Score: 1

    When the Apple store opened in Tokyo - the pre-opening line ran for miles!! The Japanese love gadgets; particularly those gadgets that combine style with functionality. Apple does a good job with this, but has done exceptionally well with Ipod. It's not surprising that this has really taken off in Japan. And just wait till the special Ipod Nano Hello Kitty edition is released!

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Tokyo Apple Store by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      And just wait till the special Ipod Nano Hello Kitty edition is released!

      ...and it doesn't even have to be an iPod video - Hello Kitty just sits there & looks cute!

  25. In A.D. 2006 by TetryonX · · Score: 5, Funny

    War was beginning.
    Japan: What happen?
    Mechanic: Somebody set up us the iPod.
    Operator: We get signal.
    Japan: What !
    Operator: Main screen turn on.
    Japan: It's You !!
    Apple: How are you gentlemen !!
    Apple: All your mp3 player are belong to us.
    Apple: You are on the way to destruction.
    Japan: What you say !!
    Apple: You have no chance to survive make your time.
    Apple: HA HA HA HA ....
    Japan: Take off every 'wma' !!
    Japan: You know what you doing.
    Japan: Move 'wma'.
    Japan: For great justice.

    --
    [!] No, I can't see my comments. They are not worthy of +3 moderation.
    1. Re:In A.D. 2006 by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

      I dont know how you didn't get modded up, rofl... Props to u man.

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    2. Re:In A.D. 2006 by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Replace WMA with ATRAC. Also, replace "Apple" with "Jobs", because that I could actually picture.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    3. Re:In A.D. 2006 by Ryz0r · · Score: 1

      haha, way to bring back a classic. Mad Props!

      --
      Peace, Love, Unity, Respect
  26. iPod this - iPod that - by orion41us · · Score: 1


    nothing beats the look of a 25 lb, 2.5 foot long boombox on a sholder, remeber when the guy with the strongest upper body would bring the tunes to all!! ahh yes, I still have back problems from back then.

    1. Re:iPod this - iPod that - by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

      yeah, I miss those days of 45 minutes to two hours of music before the batteries died and you had to go looking for 8 more D cells. Also, I miss my 8 pound cell phone, and cassette tapes.

  27. Drop the hate by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

    One problem with iPods is that their quality has led to hype, which has led to people not buying them because they refuse to buy anything that is hyped up to such an extent.

    Such people really are missing out. In some circles it is cool to hate the iPod because they are so ubiquitous, but their widespread adoption did not begin with, and is not being sustained by the cool factor alone. The iPod started as an expensive little toy that a lot of people dismissed as being another Mac Cube.

    Then something happened, word began to spread that they were actually pretty spiffy. Momentum built, and along with clever marketing, Apple took the industry by storm.

    All I own is a 1GB Shuffle, and I have to say, it's cheap, the sound quality is excellent, and the damn thing is indestructible. I've dropped it on concrete countless times, been hit by a car while carrying (but not using) it and the thing holds up.

    If you don't like the styling, features and price, that's one thing. Just don't hate the iPod and iTunes because they are so damn commonplace now. They are that way for a very good reason.

    1. Re:Drop the hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All I own is a 1GB Shuffle, and I have to say, it's cheap, the sound quality is excellent, and the damn thing is indestructible. I've dropped it on concrete countless times, been hit by a car while carrying (but not using) it and the thing holds up."

      Lightness is the Shuffle's savior. *nods sagely*

    2. Re:Drop the hate by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Sorry - side thread - fuck the iPod - how did YOU hold up?

      Granted you're typing - but you could be using a mouthstick for all I know...

    3. Re:Drop the hate by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the concern. My right wrist was shattered and has a serious case of arthritis and its mobility is permanently limited, while my left shoulder was dislocated and broken - nasty arthritis there too. The worst part was, it was a hit and run and I have no idea who did it to me. A passer-by held a cellphone up to my face so I could give a description of the vehicle and where it was going, then the witnesses left the scene, and the cop who came to see me in the E.R. walked up to me laughing saying they would never find the guy and they had no leads despite the fact the 911 dispatch center knew where the car was within 30 seconds of the incident. Typical Memphis.

      Anyway, I lost my mobility, my job, my apartment and my life savings. Managed to eek out a settlement with my insurance company that paid most of the medical bills and left me with some cash to replace my 4 year old iBook that has a dying screen with an iMac. Some may say I could have spent the money on other things, but after all of that, I figured that I deserved it.

      At 23, going on 24, I'm back living with my parents in CT...healed yet jobless, but hey...at least the Shuffle is OK. :)

    4. Re:Drop the hate by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's precisely the same reason I haven't read any of the Harry Potter books.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:Drop the hate by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      which has led to people not buying them because they refuse to buy anything that is hyped up to such an extent

      If people aren't willing to evaluate an entity based on its merits, and are just interested in conforming to the non-conformist herd, well, great. We'll out compete them.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  28. iTunes by awinn233 · · Score: 0

    I would just like to say that iTunes for Windows sucks compared to iTunes for Mac. Although they are the same program and look pretty much the same, iTunes just feels better on a Mac. This is in response to someone saying that iTunes for Windows was a crappy program.

    1. Re:iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's iTunes that's the problem.

  29. Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Xbox was big in Japan.

    Physically.

  30. I guess I still don't get it by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why does your average MP3 player need to be more intuitive? My Rave MP has up and down arrows instead of a virtual scroll wheel. The latter may be somewhat cooler, but it's not any more efficient. You can operate it just as fast, just as easily, with one hand. You have playlists, shuffle, etc. Fast forwarding through a song is as simple as--get this--holding down the fast forward/skip button. I use folders to organize my songs, and transfering them to the Rave is as easy as plugging it in and dragging and dropping from Windows Explorer (or more frequently, Nautilus. It auto-mounts just fine in Ubuntu.) Not having to run any extra client software at all is what I consider "integration." And not only did it cost me well over $50 less than the equivalent iPod, it had features that the iPod lacked, like a digital FM tuner, the ability to record songs off of radio, and a built-in microphone for voice memos. And finally, looks: It's a deep cherry red and roundish instead of pure white and squarish. So? It looks just fine and even if you hated the color you could easily hide it in a shirt or pants pocket.

    Props to the Apple marketing department. Props to whomever put together the iTunes store. Props to whomever put together such a slick, minimalistic package and make it popular. I'm not knocking the iPod in any way, I'm just sick of people trying to convince me that all other MP3 players are ugly and nigh impossible to use. I select the folder (or the playlist), I select shuffle, I hit play--what can possibly be simpler than that? I drag and drop from the file manager I *already use* to organize my music--what proprietary client feature could make it easier than that?

    What could possibly be worth an extra $50? I'm not going to pay it for the brand name just so I can impress my friends. I'm not going to pay it for an interface that's no more intuitive than scroll arrows. I'm not going to pay it for the software that cannot run natively in Linux and eats up more memory/CPU than Explorer alone in Windows. And I'm damn sure not going to pay it just for the white paint job.

    I'm not trolling, I just genuinely don't get it. All the "features" that make the iPod so superior are either already present on many (most?) other MP3 players or just a matter of taste (white and square design vs. roundish and colored.)

    1. Re:I guess I still don't get it by WaKall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So which other players let you rate your music on the portable device and build playlists that include song rating as a filter? And update those smart-playlists in real time as the traits of a song change, like it's playcount, rating, last-played-date?

      This is the killer feature of the iPod for me. When I get new songs, they go into a playlist of 'unrated' songs. They stay there until I give them a rating, and then I can pull up the playlist for 4-5 star songs and get all the music I like and none of the stuff I don't. And if I want, I can _still_ browse by album/artist like you are doing.

      It's not about having the most features, it's about having features that the majority of people want.

    2. Re:I guess I still don't get it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      My Rave MP has up and down arrows instead of a virtual scroll wheel. The latter may be somewhat cooler, but it's not any more efficient

      How easy is it to adjust your speed scrolling through a list with arrow buttons? Can you quickly skip through a to n in your list of artists to get to the one you want? The scroll wheel is a very nice device for this kind of thing, since it allows both fine- and coarse-grained movement with similar ease.

      Fast forwarding through a song is as simple as--get this--holding down the fast forward/skip button.

      The iPod has fast forward buttons as well. They are okay, but they only skip forward at a fixed rate. Skipping backwards or forwards to an exact point is much easier with the scroll wheel.

      I use folders to organize my songs, and transfering them to the Rave is as easy as plugging it in and dragging and dropping from Windows Explorer

      That's nice. I use playlists (some created manually, some created via rules). Folders do not allow me to have music in different places in my hierarchy (unless it supports symbolic links, but since you say you use Explorer to copy files to it this seems unlikely) would not allow me to browse by artist and also browse by album - both of which I do on my iPod. Oh, and I don't do any dragging and dropping - my iPod sync's itself as soon as it is plugged in, then appears in the Finder as a mass storage device once it is finished.

      I'll let you have FM radio. The only device I own which contains an FM tuner these days is my mobile 'phone (which is suffering from an advanced case of feature creep). I don't want one, so if you added one to my iPod it would just be added weight for me to carry around.

      I used to organise my music in folders and play it using WinAMP (2.x - I never liked 3.x). Then I realised what an atrocious way of organising anything which had associated metadata a single hierarchical view was. I have no intention of going back to that way of working - I hope to abandon it for other document types eventually.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't get it because you haven't used it.

      The iPod's scroll wheel isn't just about scrolling up and down, it's about all of the other things it ALSO can do. You really do need to use one.

      Playlists? I promise, you might HAVE playlists, but they're not like the iTunes playlists. If you don't understand what I mean, you need to get iTunes and create a few smart playlists. Rate your music. Organize it in a way that once you start to see how it applies to the iPod you will suddenly start to realize why iPod lovers love theirs and why they tend to literally give away their old MP3 players.

      You seem to be under the impression that just because the "features" in the iPod are present in other players that they are implimented as well.

      Use an iPod. Actually go get one, play with iTunes, and see what it's about. No. Seriously. It will change your mind.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    4. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is how the 'virtual scroll wheel' ever became more popular than forward and back buttons anyway... its more work to operate, and it can't be operated in a pocket because it goes nuts whenever it touches anything (at least I couldn't reliably do it)... I had to take the thing out of my pocket to operate it at all. That really annoyed me. So I sold the bastard. Tactile buttons are definitely a better design for a device that can't always count on being right-side-up with nothing poking it. And if said buttons are different shapes (like on a Rio 500) they're even easier to operate blindly.

      I might have to look up that Rave MP sometime, but since I sold the iPod I've found that I am equally fine without an mp3 player (my head plays songs anyway, though its taste is sometimes questionable). I may not bother to get another.

    5. Re:I guess I still don't get it by mofomojo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not about the general features, all massive storage media players have these, it's about the small things.

      A lot of companies try to improve a product by %100 by adding one new feature, but the iPod improves 100 of the existing features by %1.

      This is what makes it so good, the small things, and so forth. Plus the simplistic design and so on. Buttons are annoying to use and hard on fingers, and more importantly hard to use in pockets. So, the add the click wheel where all you have to do is turn it a little bit to do whatever it will do.

      It's the small things, the amount of effort put into perfecting these devices and the ease of use on the UI that makes them so great.

      It's a good product, and on top of that, iPods are a recognizable name so they are consumers' first choice. Just like how the WalkMans were popular in the '80s, iPods have taken that place.

    6. Re:I guess I still don't get it by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Point by point explanation for you then:

      Q: Why does your average MP3 player need to be more intuitive?
      A: Because most people aren't as smart as you are.

      Q: My Rave MP has up and down arrows instead of a virtual scroll wheel. The latter may be somewhat cooler, but it's not any more efficient. You can operate it just as fast, just as easily, with one hand.
      A: It's actually much more efficient. How many times do you have to press "down" to scroll through a list of 200 songs? Of 2,000 songs? How long do you have to hold the "down" button? With the iPod you can scroll through 200 songs in about the same time as 100 songs; or even 10 songs.

      Q: You have playlists, shuffle, etc. Fast forwarding through a song is as simple as--get this--holding down the fast forward/skip button.
      A: If you've got a 4 minute song, how long does it take to scroll through 3 minutes of it? On an iPod with scroll wheel, it takes about 5 seconds. How long does it take to scroll through 5 minutes of a 6 minute song? It takes about 5 seconds on an iPod with scroll wheel.

      Q: I use folders to organize my songs, and transfering them to the Rave is as easy as plugging it in and dragging and dropping from Windows Explorer (or more frequently, Nautilus. It auto-mounts just fine in Ubuntu.) Not having to run any extra client software at all is what I consider "integration."
      A: You don't have to organize your songs with an iPod. iTunes does it for you. Do you also organize your inodes? Your sectors, tracks, and cylinders? Your file tables? Or do you let the OS do that for you? Do you consider an OS as "extra client software" to enable you to access your hardware?

      Q: And not only did it cost me well over $50 less than the equivalent iPod, it had features that the iPod lacked, like a digital FM tuner, the ability to record songs off of radio, and a built-in microphone for voice memos.
      A: Point to you. It costs $30 for an FM tuner, $30 for a Mic on an iPod.

      Q: And finally, looks: It's a deep cherry red and roundish instead of pure white and squarish. So? It looks just fine and even if you hated the color you could easily hide it in a shirt or pants pocket.
      A: People pay for their looks. The iPod is deceptively simple; a screen, a wheel, and a button. That's it.

      Q: Props to the Apple marketing department. Props to whomever put together the iTunes store. Props to whomever put together such a slick, minimalistic package and make it popular. I'm not knocking the iPod in any way, I'm just sick of people trying to convince me that all other MP3 players are ugly and nigh impossible to use.
      A: I'm trying to convince you the iPod is easier to use.

      Q: I select the folder (or the playlist), I select shuffle, I hit play--what can possibly be simpler than that?
      A: The iPod is about the same, no advantage there.

      Q: I drag and drop from the file manager I *already use* to organize my music--what proprietary client feature could make it easier than that?
      A: Not having to organize your music is easier :) With an iPod you take no action, such as drag and drop. You merely plug it in, and it auto-synchronizes.

      Q: What could possibly be worth an extra $50?
      A: Let us list two things that may be worth the extra $50:
      1) Not having to organize files
      2) Not having to synchronize files
      3) Being able to

    7. Re:I guess I still don't get it by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      Thing is, I have used it, and it just isn't that special. The scroll wheel is ok, but I don't think its inherently superior to other interfaces.
      As for the "smart" playlists, I have thousands of songs.. When I'm listening to music, I want to sit back and enjoy it, not fuck around with my mp3 player every 4 minutes to rate the song I just heard. I also don't want to spend hours rating them one by one. It's a futile waste of time. I know in my head which songs are good, and I do a way better job of adjusting the ratings there in real time than the ipod ever will.
      The whole concept of smart playlists and these "content managers" just seems stupid to me. I dont have the time to rate my music, just like I dont have the time to tag my images or other documents. The time I spend on tagging is far more than I would ever save on searching.

    8. Re:I guess I still don't get it by superflyguy · · Score: 1

      Thank you for providing the first reasonable explaination I have ever seen for a situation where buttons are better than the scrollwheel.

    9. Re:I guess I still don't get it by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      Errr, I like ALL of the music that goes on my player, so I really don't see the point in rating it. If I want to organize, I can do so via folders or playlists, and I'd wager I can drag and drop into folders faster than you can individually rate each song.

    10. Re: I guess I still don't get it by gidds · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'll try to explain. (I probably won't do a very good job of it, but hey, no-one else has tried yet :)

      Where the iPod scores isn't in big features. It doesn't have a tick-list of big features to impress you, like other gadgets do (Sony's, especially). Where it does score is in lots and lots of really little things that individually sound stupid or not worth bothering about, but collectively add up to a really great experience. That's Apple's way of doing things, from their Mac hardware and software down, and that's why people love them; the "It Just Works" motto is a good description. Their stuff doesn't get in the way, it doesn't try to impress you, it just does what you want it to as easily as possible.

      I'll try to address your individual points, but I suspect that the answers won't mean much unless you actually use an iPod, preferably for a week or two.

      The scroll wheel: the big advantage here is that you're controlling how fast the selection moves, not just in which direction. Even though my albums list has a thousand or so entries, I can zip really quickly down to the approximate area, then slow down, and zero in on the right one. Sure, you can do that with arrows or buttons or whatever, but the scroll wheel is that much faster, more controllable, more intuitive.

      It's similar for fast-forwarding. On the iPod, you can hold down the forward or backward buttons just like on any other device. But you can also (after pressing the centre button) use the scroll wheel, which again is great for zipping straight to one particular part of the song, especially if it's a long one or you want fine control.

      As to the software, I know iTunes isn't everyone's cup of tea, but the integration is really good. I've told it to sync a couple of playlists, so every time I plug in my iPod, iTunes fires up and syncs. No user action needed at all; it transfers any new songs to the iPod, removes any no longer in the playlist, updates play counts and times for songs you've played on either machine, copies to the iPod any edits you've done to track names or other data -- as I said, It Just Works.

      I don't have another current MP3 player, so I can't compare directly, but maybe a comparison with my MD player would help. The MD player has a 'play' button, a 'stop' button, a 'mode' button, an 'edit' button, a 'disp' button, a 'rec' button, and two paddles which move up/down/in marked 'vol+/-/bass' and '>>/<</entersync', and each of these has several different functions depending which mode it's in. Some of them must be pushed several times to cycle through the different options; some must be held down for several seconds; some must be used in combination. In short, it's a pain to use. I learned how do do all I wanted to, but it was never easy, and I'd still forget some of the more advanced stuff. And while it's manageable for a single MD, I dread to think how it'd scale up to a HD full of music.

      The iPod, OTOH, has only five buttons and one slider, and they do one or at most two things. And the interface is completely different: instead of umpteen different pages and modes, with all of the buttons having completely different functions in each, there's a menu structure. One single menu structure. Wherever you are in the menu, the wheel and the buttons do exactly the same thing. You can always see where you are in relation to everything else, and there's practically nothing to learn. (I first used an iPod in a shop for about two minutes, and on my own completely figured it all out.) It's childishly simple.

      As I said, this won't sound like a big advantage, but once you've used it, anything else seems like hard work. The beauty of it is that you don't need to think about it; you just do what you want to do, and can keep thinking about your music or whatever. 'Simplicity' will never be a feature people put on their ticklists for new gadgets, nor will it be an advertising point for anything in the technology world, b

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    11. Re:I guess I still don't get it by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      Speaking of radio.

      The only radio I have that I ever turn on is in my car. This is mostly to play stuff from my iPod through my RoadTrip. For me this is one of two killer features. The other was that I already had and used iTunes on my iBook so that intergration was nice.

      Although I do love that it also "just works" and I can drag a drop tunes into it with my OpenBSD boxes.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    12. Re:I guess I still don't get it by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      Several people now have mentioned the "feature" that auto-sycronizes the music on my HD with the music in the iPod. I don't see how that's going to work at all for flash players. On my computer HD I have several dozen gigabytes of MP3s--on my MP3 player, I have 1.25 gigabytes. How does iTunes magically know which songs I want to copy over? I suspect that the answer is "it does not", and I would be forced to manually copy it over using a third party program instead of the file manager(s) I am already familiar with.

      I'll give you the scroll wheel. I guess it would be a bit handier for scrolling through very long lists. However, I don't think it's +$50 handier...

    13. Re: I guess I still don't get it by gidds · · Score: 3, Insightful
      PS...

      It's just struck me that the Apple philosophy (do one thing and do it well) is rather like the Unix philosophy (where each command does just one thing and does it well). As contrasted with that of most other gadgets (try to do everything), which you might consider more similar to another OS entirely...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    14. Re:I guess I still don't get it by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      As for the "smart" playlists, I have thousands of songs..

      I have tens of thousands of songs...all rated (except 51 new ones). Yes, it takes time to rate them all. Yes, it can be a pain in the ass. Yes, it's worth it. If you have thousands of songs, you like some more than others. Actually, you love some and hate others. Once they're rated you can enjoy them how you want. Want to hear everything? No problem. Want to hear your four- and five-star songs? No problem. Want to hear everything but bias towards the higher-rated songs? Okay, so you can only do it in Party Shuffle (but it's bound to show up in Smart Playlists at some point).

      You make time for the things that are important to you. My tunes are important to me so I made the time (48 new ones left to go). It's up to you.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    15. Re: I guess I still don't get it by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      The wheel is sounding nicer the more I hear about it. I will give you all that point. Variable speed scrolling would indeed be nice, but I'm not willing to spend $50 more and give up my FM tuner and voice recording features for it.

      I don't think that syncing is worth anything at all--copying over the old playlist is just as easy and quicker. For a small, flash-based player, automatically copying over all new songs on my HD simply isn't an option. Also, the few-button menu system you describe is exactly how my Rave works. I understand how everything worked in less than a minute. It is as simple and intuitive as you can get...

    16. Re:I guess I still don't get it by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      So you can organize and move files around ON YOUR PLAYER as you are listing to them?
      I believe thats what the parent poster was talking about... being able to do that while you are listing, as time changes so does my taste in music, click the button, change the rating and you are good to go.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    17. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See this is what I don't get when I bought an iPod for my wife I went the entire other way around. I used to think the iPod must be nice even though I don't understand the hype to I hate the iPod with a burning passion only equaled by the nuclear furnace of the Sun.

      I am married to a non tech who hangs out with other non techs. They all bought iPods and nobody I have ever met can use the stupid things. They are far from intuitive and the scroll whell assumes too much and confuses people when it jumps from one list to another or changes the volume when you wanted to fast forward or the myriad of other idiot things it does.

      Somebody pointed out in the HDTV DRM article that Slashdot gets a scewed view of these things becasue we are the tech crowd. The iPod is a prime example of this sure we can use it but frankly the masses only buy it because it is "lickable" to use an over used buzzword.

      I can no longer rember how many playlists I've had to update how many "My iPod is broken" calls I get through my wife. Plus most of these people could really care less. Hell the receptionist at my work just has one that sits on her desk so people see it. The thing has never even been turned on.

      iPods appeal to geeks and are shiny so they sell. It is all just good marketing and the love of geeks who are good with these things. I don't mind playing with my wife's iPod even though I dislike the interface I can understand it. It is just the incesent compaining from all the other people that makes me hate it so much.

    18. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Kankraka · · Score: 1

      Don't you get it, Apple WANTS you to take it out of your pocket, so those around you KNOW you've got an iPod! As if those annoyingly cheap, white earphones didn't give it away enough. It's all about showing off your over-priced piece of trendiness. Fashion over function!

    19. Re:I guess I still don't get it by geekoid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      NO!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:I guess I still don't get it by jcr · · Score: 1

      What could possibly be worth an extra $50?

      Borrow one for a week, and you'll have your answer.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    21. Re:I guess I still don't get it by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      There are several ways to synchronize to a flash player:

      iTunes will automatically resize (by reducing bitrate) when transferring to a iPod shuffle
      iTunes can use special playlists; one poster mentioned "least played". I use "most played". You can also select "most played but not played in the last three days" or "least played with greater than 1 star rating". Because iTunes uses a database, you can use some pretty fancy logic on your playlists
      iTunes can also do random synchronization

      None of these solutions require, as you put it, "manually copy it over".

      Also, if you have several dozen gigabytes of MP3s... that's why they invented a 30gb iPod and a 60gb iPod.

    22. Re:I guess I still don't get it by socalian45678 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more about the buttons... so I'm getting one of these for my 3G: Nyko Itop Button Relocator

    23. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't get what's so great about iPods either. I've owned an iRiver H320 for a little over a year and a half and I love it. The H320 has a color screen, radio, plays video, views pictures, text, and supports more audio formats than the iPod. Everytime a new iPod comes out, I laugh at the people that get so excited over the "new" features that I've had for over a year. Plus, with my iRiver, I'm not stuck with iTunes. I just plug 'er in and drag and drop. Simple. Oh, and I can navigate just as quickly and easily with buttons.

    24. Re: I guess I still don't get it by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%, and I'd like to add the one feature of my cheap-ass 1GB "Vibe" MP3 player from PNY that, as far as I know, no iPods have: when the battery runs low, I pop a new AAA battery in for the next 10 hours or so. Oh yeah, it's also got FM tuner and voice recording, but I've never bothered with them anyway, so it's hard to count that as a feature in my case.

      Also, it may just be me, but I frankly just don't want a HDD for something that I use to work out with - solid state lasts longer and uses less battery, and won't get damaged while I'm exercising. That cuts out about half the iPods anyway, and was always the reason I never recommended them. Now, the newer ones look interesting, but I'm not going to give up my perfectly good Vibe for that. Maybe if it ever breaks.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    25. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a trap!

    26. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      There's no way you'd be able to drag and drop files into random scattered folders faster than it takes someone to set a star rating on an iPod. In iTunes, I'd be able to go from album to album before you'd be done closing your windows to go to the next album.

      Yeah, I like all the music on my player, too, but I like some more than others, and a few are top-notch five-star classics. I can use Smart Playlists to randomly pull out the best of the best, or I can make playlists to grab some of my lesser played songs and give them a try.

      You're just living behind the times. Organizing via folders and playlists? I get the feeling you're one of those freakish "I have to organize every single song on the filesystem because I don't trust automatic organizers like iTunes" even though iTunes not only automatically creates those folders for you based on parameters you determine, it renders folders obsolete anyway. That's the most important feature of a jukebox player. Clicking through a filesystem like I used to do in my Winamp days seems so hilarious in retrospect. When I can just type the first few characters of a band in the search field and get what I want in 2 seconds.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    27. Re:I guess I still don't get it by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Can you run your MP3 player while it's inside a soft case AND in your leather jacket pocket, without putting your hands in your pocket, while wearing light gloves?

      I can run my iPod that way (although I'll admit volume up/down gets a bit sketchy with that many layers). That's why the controls are so nice.

    28. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      I use folders to organize my songs, and transfering them to the Rave is as easy as plugging it in and dragging and dropping from Windows Explorer

      Funny, I have my computer do work for me, since that's what it was designed to do. I have no need to "use folders to organize my songs" because iTunes has rendered the folder 100% obsolete. Clicking through a filesystem to organize music in the year 2006 is hilarious. Not only does it take three times as long, but you lose the metadata capabilities, Smart Playlist features, and instant interface of having everything right in front of you and being able to type the first four characters of a band's name to instantly have them appear right in front of you.

      Transferring to my iPod is as easy as plugging it in. It auto-syncs according to my predetermined conditions. You have to manually drag and drop for yours.

      I have a feeling you've never tried an iPod with iTunes for a week. You'd never go back, because it's a superior product.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    29. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Magical solution: So don't fuck around with playlists and ratings.

      You still can't beat the jukebox interface that makes using a filesystem to organize thousands of songs look ridiculous in comparison, or the auto-syncing features. I make iTunes transfer my most recently added music, so whenever I want something new, I simply plug in, wait 30 seconds, and go on my way.

      The whole concept of smart playlists and these "content managers" just seems stupid to me. I dont have the time to rate my music, just like I dont have the time to tag my images or other documents. The time I spend on tagging is far more than I would ever save on searching.

      You don't need to do tagging to use iTunes, although it's silly to claim you don't have time to rate music when you're already spending time listening to the music. It takes like three clicks on an iPod to rate something.

      What seems stupid to me is living in a world where managing thousands of files in a folder hierarchy is somehow better than a program that makes such a scheme obsolete. If I want to listen to Tool, I just type "too," and everything's already there. No more endless double-clicking.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    30. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, I have used it, and it just isn't that special. The scroll wheel is ok, but I don't think its inherently superior to other interfaces.

      Then sorry but you're 100% wrong. The scroll wheel is absolutely inherently superior because you can control scroll speed. I have 300 albums on my iPod. I can scroll to the S's with no problem. Your beloved "Up/down button" scheme would have me sitting there waiting for the stupid thing to speed up. And you complain about wasting time!

      Youre just living in an ancient world where files are hidden away in vast hierarchies that you have to navigate through to get to anything. You bitch about lack of time without realizing Smart Playlists are there to save you time. I can create a heavy metal playlist just by grabbing random metal songs in a Smart Playlist, or 4+ star rated pop music, or orchestral music longer than 10 minutes if I really want to zone out for some reason. I don't have to waste time dragging-and-dropping (yuck!). The playlist does it for me automatically. Or I don't have to use playlists at all (I only use them about 30% of the time) and just listen through whole albums. I don't have to waste time clicking through genre folders, then band folders, than album folders...I just type the name of the album in the search field...

      Maybe you don't have any time because you're still double-clicking through folders!

    31. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Okay, I have to admit I've responded to you elsewhere with a little vitriol since you had said you tried an iPod and seemed to be ignoring the features of iTunes that made it superior to the old method of manual folder management. But in this comment you reveal that you haven't really used an iPod with iTunes for any useful period of time, so you honestly don't know what you're missing.

      There are multiple ways you can set up iTunes to copy music to your iPod:

      1.) By default it tries to copy everything in your library, and if you don't have enough space on your iPod, iTunes tells you it will copy as much as it can. If you've got a small music collection, you can even use the checkmarks beside each song name and have iTunes only copy the checked music.

      2.) Manually dragging music from the library to the mounted iPod icon in iTunes. This is similar to what you do now with your manual copying, though it's still simpler since you don't have to navigate a vast folder hierarchy of music (shudder...memories of my old music collection before iTunes came out).

      3.) The obvious solution and the one most people use is create a playlist and tell iTunes to copy whatever is in the playlist to your iPod. You can have a manual playlist where you simply drag music to it that you want to hear, and next time you plug in, iTunes will copy it automatically. Or, you can create a Smart Playlist, and now your iPod will have music based on the algorithms and conditions you set in the Smart Playlist (it sounded like something I would never use either...until I tried it and loved it). You can have multiple playlists and check off the ones you want iTunes to keep automatically synced.

      So the answer to your question of how iTunes knows what to copy over is that you tell it exactly what you want, so that you don't have to worry about it ever again. When I get a cool new album, I just drag it over to my "iPod music" playlist. Next time I plug in my iPod, the album will be synced, and I'm outta there.

      This control extends to everything iPods can play/display--videos, photos, and podcasts. You can tell iTunes exactly what you want it to be copying. I have a photo album of my friends' pictures that iTunes also keeps synced.

      It's time you read the guides at iLounge and read about how people use iTunes. The whole hipness/cool factor of iPod/iTunes is just icing on the cake.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    32. Re: I guess I still don't get it by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      The money you'll waste on AAA batteries over the years will be enough to buy a new 1GB iPod nano.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    33. Re:I guess I still don't get it by pen · · Score: 1
      I agree wholeheartedly, and love my (now second) iPod. One thing that the iPod lacks, IMO, is a dedicated volume control. It can be kind of frustrating trying to turn down a song that is way too loud while the iPod is not in the Now Playing screen.

      Now that I've figured it out for myself, I offer the following tips for other iPod users:

      • The Play/Pause button will always pause the currently playing song. Use this to minimize damage to your ears.
      • The Play/Pause button will not always unpause the song you just paused. If the selected menu is an artist, album, song, or playlist, it will start playing it. This is also how you can queue up an artist's several albums at once.
      • The Prev/Next buttons will always skip to the next/previous song, no matter what menu you're in.
      • The fastest way to get back to the Now Playing screen -- other than waiting a few seconds for it to reappear -- is to mash the Menu button 3-6 times, scroll all the way down, and hit the center button.
    34. Re:I guess I still don't get it by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Drag and drop is two more steps than it takes to update an iPod.

      I just plug 'er in. There is no step two.

      Also, about navigating with buttons, imagine what driving a car is like if you had to use buttons to turn left or right. Imagine what turning a door knob is like if you had to use buttons to get it to move, instead of twisting it. That's the strength of the scroll wheel.

      But different strokes for different folks. It's the existence of folk like you that drive Apple to continually refine their interface and product.

    35. Re:I guess I still don't get it by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      can't be operated in a pocket because it goes nuts whenever it touches anything (at least I couldn't reliably do it)... I had to take the thing out of my pocket to operate it at all.

      Why don't you just switch the controls lock and use the inline remote on the headphones?

    36. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Mainly because the headphones are shitty generic earbuds, and who wants to be locked into a specific pair of headphones anyway? Functionality of the headphones should be independent of functionality of the player. That top button relocator thing in another post looks vaguely interesting though, were I willing to buy another iPod.

    37. Re:I guess I still don't get it by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      What I don't understand is how the 'virtual scroll wheel' ever became more popular than forward and back buttons anyway... its more work to operate, and it can't be operated in a pocket because it goes nuts whenever it touches anything (at least I couldn't reliably do it)... I had to take the thing out of my pocket to operate it at all.

      Because you might look like a pervert on a bus/subway fumbling with something in your front pocket? Other people might not realize that you are not playing pocket pool and call the transit police on you.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    38. Re:I guess I still don't get it by mccoyspace · · Score: 1

      uh, the inline remote is not part of the headphones. It ends in a stereo-mini socket into which you can plug in any headphones you want.

    39. Re:I guess I still don't get it by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      Yes, it takes time to rate them all

      Yes, a lot of time that I'd rather not waste (or rather, would like to waste on relaxing things instead).

      Actually, you love some and hate others.

      Yes, I know the ones I love, and I delete the ones I hate. Why would I keep songs that I hate?

      My tastes change over time, and more importantly, they change based on my mood. Sometimes I really like to listen to some classical music (while programming for example) so I would rate it highly. At other times I enjoy the occasional stint of death metal. A playlist with both of these highly rated genres is completely useless.

    40. Re:I guess I still don't get it by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      Magical solution: So don't fuck around with playlists and ratings.

      Exactly. There goes the big so called advantage of iPod/iTunes.

      You don't need to do tagging to use iTunes, although it's silly to claim you don't have time to rate music when you're already spending time listening to the music. It takes like three clicks on an iPod to rate something.

      It's not silly to claim that at all. I don't feel like doing it, because when I'm listening to music, I'm usually either doing something else at the same time and don't want to be interrrupted, or enjoying the music, and don't want to be interrupted. So if I'm jogging listening to music, I should dig around in my pocket for my mp3 player every 4 minutes to rate a song? It's completely retarded.
      Who am I rating for anyway? I'm not a review service, and my brain does a far better job of keeping track of what I like automatically.

    41. Re:I guess I still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, give it up. Some people are going to be so blinded by their bias and their apparent superior understanding of a presumed product they conceive to be inferior that they will *never* change their minds even through regular exposure and with their peers evangelizing to them to just 'give it a try.' You are never going to get this guy to see reason, he's just going to snick up some comment that proves you are wrong, even if that comment doesn't have any grounds to stand up on. These types of people will always live their lives blisfully thru ignorance, even when they deny it.

    42. Re: I guess I still don't get it by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      Do people still use alkaline for their high-drain devices?

      I use NiMH in mine and a single AAA lasts at least 5 hours. Rayovac IC-3 batteries are the bomb--even if I don't have a spare handy, they charge in 15 minutes or less.

    43. Re: I guess I still don't get it by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      I know iTunes isn't everyone's cup of tea, but the integration is really good. I've told it to sync a couple of playlists, so every time I plug in my iPod, iTunes fires up and syncs. No user action needed at all; it transfers any new songs to the iPod, removes any no longer in the playlist, updates play counts and times for songs you've played on either machine, copies to the iPod any edits you've done to track names or other data -- as I said, It Just Works.

      I'm with the person who likes the iPod but not so much with the iTunes. My iPod is not large enough to hold all my mp3s, so I choose which ones I want by selecting them, and enabling the 'sync selected tunes' option (or whatever it's called).

      Despite playing around with iTunes, I find it's really cumbersome when size of your mp3 library > size of your iPod. For example, if I want to select all tracks on an album, I have to manually select them in the list, and then 'tick' them. I can't just say 'sync this album'.

      The main issue I have though is that when iTunes does its sync routine, it takes about 7 minutes. And that's a best case scenario - i.e. when there are no tunes that it actually has to copy. It takes 7 minutes to check the sync list (my PC is a 3.2GHz P4 with 2Gb RAM btw). And for much of this time iTunes appears unresponsive/appears to have crashed. So when I quickly want to add a couple of albums before going out, it takes ages. In fact I've stopped using iTunes.

      Yeah, yeah, I know - all the usual excuses - I must have it set up wrong, there 'must be something wrong' with my setup/computer/religious dogma etc. The long and the short of it is that iTunes is slow and clunky enough that I don't want to use it. And it's not like I'm an inexperienced computer user.

      As for the iPod itself, it's great.

    44. Re: I guess I still don't get it by DarkJC · · Score: 1

      7 minutes? There must be some weird technical problem going on there, because my iPod, even with no syncing, takes about 30 seconds maximum. For reference, I have a 3G 20GB iPod.

    45. Re:I guess I still don't get it by pretentiousPPC · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think that your have to rate your music ever 4 minutes?

      You don't have to, but the very easy functionality is there if you want to.
      The size of libraries that you can have, means very likely that some songs that you may love may be lost/forgotten. So on the occasion that you may be listening to some under-discovered music it is extremely easy to give that song a + when you may be wanting to hear your favorites.

      I think you are missing a second great feature of rated music and smart-playlist. You can make lists that have been tagged with "Death Metal"; 4-5 Starred Rating. And have a play list "Easy Listening"; 4-5 Starred Rating. In fact I have a playlist that goes something like this: Tagged "Industrial", "EBM", "Electronica"; Not in Playlist "Goth"; 3-5 Starred: Not been played in the past week; Playcount is greater that 4; Limit to 4 hours most recently added.
      Can't you see the versatility of this? You can save time with this, rather then creating a playlist from scratch you can create rules for the music player and it will pull the music that you enjoy and want to hear according to that.

      --
      Artist will always make art.
    46. Re:I guess I still don't get it by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think that your have to rate your music ever 4 minutes?

      Well of course. Either you rate it at every song, or you rate your music in batches at a time. I don't think either is a good use of time.

      Can't you see the versatility of this?

      I can, I just don't think it's a good tradeoff. Too much time spent tagging for the time it saves me. Obviously you like things organized, and to you it is a good tradeoff, but for me, it's a waste of time.

      It's just like all the image database programs. Sure, everytime I upload images from my digicam I could tag each one with the location, as well as people or places depicted in them. This would make searching for things a snap.. I could say "find pictures of my friend bob in switzerland" and the program would do it. But how often do I need to actually do that? For me, barely ever. So when I actually do need to find that picture of bob in switzerland, it might take me 5 minutes, but that's ok, since I barely ever have to do it. For me, it's exactly the same with music.

    47. Re: I guess I still don't get it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Apple has a rather Zen methodology for most things (other than dropping support for their previous OS release ASAP). Unix shares this. Interesting considering the topic.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    48. Re:I guess I still don't get it by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      "The whole concept of smart playlists and these "content managers" just seems stupid to me. I dont have the time to rate my music, just like I dont have the time to tag my images or other documents. The time I spend on tagging is far more than I would ever save on searching."

      Then rate everything as a "3", and when ever the mood strikes you, tweak the current playing song up or down a notch or two. If you decide the current song is a little tired and you don't want to hear it much, knock it down to a 2. If you like it a lot, boost it up to a four.

      I have a set of playlists, for 0 stars and up, 1 star and up,... through 5 stars. Using the above scheme, you could just use "3 stars and up" all the time, until you reach a critical mass of rated songs.

      Personally, I set newly acquired songs to 4 stars, and listen to the 4+ star playlist most of the time. If I decide I don't like a new song that much, I knock it down a few pegs.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    49. Re:I guess I still don't get it by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


      You can use multiple criteria, so you could have playlists of rated metal songs that exclude everything else, playlists of rated classical music that exclude everything else, and playlists of rated tracks that exclude both death metal and classical.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    50. Re:I guess I still don't get it by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know the ones I love, and I delete the ones I hate. Why would I keep songs that I hate?

      I find I have songs I can listen to all the time, songs I would rather hear less often, and songs that I want to keep but don't want in regular rotation.

      I end up using the ratings as being proxies for how often I want to hear a song - not necessarily an indication of which songs are great and which songs suck.

      For what it's worth, I only have 2499 tracks, so rating them wasn't that onerous of a task. If you have more than that, it may be less desirable.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    51. Re: I guess I still don't get it by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      I don't need to keep buying batteries for my iPod; it lasts 4-5 hours and charges on its own. Saves a ton of cash.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    52. Re: I guess I still don't get it by gidds · · Score: 1
      I don't know if there's a 'right way' or a 'wrong way' to sync, but the way I do it seems to be a lot easier than yours.

      I don't bother with selecting or deselecting files. Instead, I have a playlist called 'iPod'. It's a normal, non-smart playlist, and I put into it everything I want on the iPod. Then, in the iPod options, I tell it to automatically sync to that one playlist. That way, I can drag single tracks, blocks of tracks, albums, etc. to and from the playlist, and set it up very easily. Then, when I connect the iPod, it ensure that those tracks (and no others) end up on there. (One other advantage is that when my old 3G iPod died and was replaced, I didn't have to remember what was on the old one.)

      As I said, I don't know if that's how you're supposed to use an iPod with it, but it seems to work very well for me, so maybe you could try it.

      I can't compare timings directly, coz I have a Mac and not a PC. But even on my 5-year-old Mac, and a full 60GB iPod, syncing doesn't usually take more than a minute or two unless there's a lot of stuff to copy. Just tried it: after a minute for the iPod to boot (haven't used it for a few days), mounting and syncing took one minute 15 seconds.

      It may matter how it's connected. Of course, a USB1 connection will take longer. Mine's Firewire, which is much quicker; I'd expect USB2 to be fairly comparable, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was a little slower. (I'd also not be surprised if the Windows version of iTunes wasn't quite as solid as the Mac one.)

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    53. Re: I guess I still don't get it by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Mine's a Firewire iPod too - as you say, there may be some issue with the Windows version of iTunes. i doubt it's transfer speed anyway - the iTunesDB is about 4Mb - my own software that I wrote to show the tracks on my iPod (frustrated with iTunes? me? :-)) only takes a second or two to load and decode that. For a sync operation where nothing needs to be transferred, all you need is the iTunesDB file from the iPod.

      Thanks for the playlist tip though - I might try that. If I ever install iTunes again :)

  31. New definition of cornering a market by natedubbya · · Score: 1
    It's nice to see the ipod has just over half of the market (51.3%), but that is not what we call cornering a market. That's called a majority market share. Cornering a market usually involves dominating almost the entire market and making it extremely difficult for the little guys to get a foothold. Let's wait till it is up around 80%+ and then you can start talking about cornering.

    1. Re:New definition of cornering a market by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Isn't it pretty powerful that Apple has 51% and Sony, at #2, has 16%? Perhaps not cornering, per se, but if last year they had 32%, and this year they have 51%, and they continue to grow at the same pace by next year won't they have 70% at a flat 19% a year (51-32)?

  32. ...because you haven't tried it? by TCQuad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My Rave MP has up and down arrows instead of a virtual scroll wheel. The latter may be somewhat cooler, but it's not any more efficient.

    When you want to scroll down faster to get to the bottom of your list, how do you do that? Can you hold the button down harder?

    The beauty of the scroll wheel is I can go faster or slower or many subtle degrees in between depending on how fast I move my thumb around.

    1. Re:...because you haven't tried it? by hugzz · · Score: 1
      When you want to scroll down faster to get to the bottom of your list, how do you do that? Can you hold the button down harder?

      The beauty of the scroll wheel is I can go faster or slower or many subtle degrees in between depending on how fast I move my thumb around.

      Um yes, with my old rio karma (which I lost), the scroll wheel acted in much the same way. I could just as easily move up or own 1, 2, 5, 10, or 2000 songs in one go.

      Oh, and it also plays flac and ogg, not to mention having the best sound of any mp3 player and (I think) the best battery life of any hdd player

      And it was cheap

    2. Re:...because you haven't tried it? by superiority · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's a Creative player (well, at least one, anyway) that scrolls down at different speeds depending where you move your thumb - closer to the ends of the arrows scrolls faster, closer to the centre scrolls slower.

    3. Re:...because you haven't tried it? by sirambrose · · Score: 1
      Um yes, with my old rio karma (which I lost), the scroll wheel acted in much the same way. I could just as easily move up or own 1, 2, 5, 10, or 2000 songs in one go.

      The scroll wheel on the karma did work better than I expected it to, but not quite as well as my iPod because the touch wheel can be turned continuously while the scroll wheel can't.

      Oh, and it also plays flac and ogg, not to mention having the best sound of any mp3 player and (I think) the best battery life of any hdd player

      And it was cheap


      I'll agree with you there. The scroll wheel worked great until it broke off. I guess I shouldn't have carried a cordless phone in the same pocket. I kept using it until the hard drive died even after the ethernet interface started dropping 10-20% of packets which made adding songs slow and unreliable. I saved $40 by buying the cheaper player and it died within a year. I suppose it was a valuable life lesson.

      If I could get a player with the interface of the karma and the build quality of an iRiver, I wouldn't hesitate to buy it. After my experience with those two brands, I've reevaluated the importance of ogg playback. I can't justify buying a device based on format support unless it has a well designed interface and is built well. The iPod has both qualities. It might even play vorbis one day. Unlike the iRiver I owned which hinted in the documentation that they might add ogg support to the product, the iPod is at least technically capable of playing vorbis files.

  33. I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either BS or a total moron:

    >I've owned at least 6 or 7 different non-IPOD players
    >including RIO's, RCA's, hard drive, flash based,

    because anyone who has already had 6-7 mp3 players already has to be one or the other.

  34. CD Rentals? by internetizen · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that they made no mention of the biggest reason for the popularity of MiniDiscs in Japan and how that relates to the popularity of iPods. You can go to a popular chain that rents CD's for your home enjoyment, and you would record it on MD for a high-quality replica. I don't own an MP3 player, but I have owned 3 MD players and a deck. Some of the CD's in Japan now have copy protection and in fact have built-in players such that you can't easily rip them. CD's are also very pricey compared to the US. or I should say Japanese CD's are priced higher than an American artist's.

    On the issue of nationalism, one cannot neglect the xenophilia that may also be in play. The main apple store is in Ginza along side with the highest end fashion boutiques, so one can surmise that ipod ownership may be related to foreign chic.

  35. Are you an engineer by any chance? by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

    Are you an engineer by any chance? It doesn't sound like you've even tried the iPod. And yes, I had an Archos before I had an iPod. NO COMPARISON. iPod wins hands down.

    I would encourage you to try the iPod and iTunes for a month and see if you could possibly go back to the world of non-integration and manual copying.

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
  36. this has implications to american competitors by moochfish · · Score: 1

    In a country where nationalistic pride makes consumers choose Japanese products first, the iPod is dominating. Sony's flash MP3 player share has actually shrunk since it was winning in 2004.

    Why is this significant to US competitors? Because this is a wake up call to all of those companies trying to blame their failure to enter the market on Apple's FairPlay DRM scheme. Sorry, but iTunes has nothing to do with your failure either. Your products are way less attractive compared to the iPod, even if they have lower prices. The iPod is dominating because it is exactly what consumers are looking for at the perfect price point(s).

    Let's see if they figure it out now.

  37. You define what songs are copied by converge18t · · Score: 1

    I have 10GB of music but only a 6GB Ipod Mini. I set the syncing playlist to copy songs "least recently played". Therefore if I listen to a song in the Ipod, the next time I sync, that song will get "swapped" with a less recently played song.

  38. Re:*** Leans back, waits for little death *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haven't heard of povpod.com hunh?

    hold your video ipod at your navel, for the correct point of view.

  39. What will Apple do in 3 years? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    When 1" hard drives or flash storage hold plenty of music and are cheap enough to put in lower-priced cell phones? Maybe then there will be an Apple-infused phone with a scroll wheel (virtual?)?

  40. Kojima is big on iPod. by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 1

    Metal Gear Solid series creator Hideo Kojima makes much use of iPods. In his blog, he mentioned that he uses an iPod to listen to music. And now he is making podcasts. He is supposed to be one of Sony's leading supporters, or at least one of PS3's leading supporters, but here is using Apple hardware and software whenever he likes.

  41. iPod already beat the Walkman by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    I'm confused by this statement: "Still, iPod's continuing dominance in Japan isn't a sure thing. For starters, Sony isn't giving up the chase. Its new Walkman, which will be released in the U.S. this year, has been well-received in Japan."

    Did someone forget to tell Sony that their six-month-old "hip, fab, stylish" Walkman Bean has already been steamrolled by the iPod?

  42. The reason is simple. by MeridianOnTheLake · · Score: 1

    I live in Japan, and the reason the iPod is so popular is very very simple. The iPod is simply so much better and more intuitive than the players released by Sony and to a lesser extent other manufacturers. Don't think Japanese aren't also sick of Sony's crap. Years of bad experiences with crippled products (I think it started with DAT) have primed Japanese to jump on the first digital audio product that is significantly better. Forget nationalistic pride, iPod is cool, and now that the iPod has reached critical mass, I don't see Sony gaining much market share back for a very long time.

  43. Hard access by maggern · · Score: 1

    Traditionally, access to the japaneese market has been extremely hard. Cars, electronics, vacumm cleaners, you name it.
    Hence, it is not given that the iPod would prove itself to be a hit there. I guess that extremely good producs always will do good, no matter where the market is
    Go Apple!

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. What could possibly be worth an extra $50? by bill_kress · · Score: 1

    What could possibly be worth an extra $50?

    That's exactly what everyone who hasn't tried one has said (at least in my experience, including myself.

    It's EXACTLY the same response I get when I try to tell someone they should use gmail over hotmail/Yahoo mail--it's just better in so many barely perceptible ways that it's impossible to describe.

    Same response I get when I try to explain why someone should use IM instead of email...

    To post a letter like you did without trying it is only displaying ignorance. I don't mean that in a rude way, I mean you really can't know unless you used one for a few months, you are ignorant of the entire thing.

    Asking questions will never ever answer your questions because you have nothing in your life experience to use as a comparison.

    You are right, it does nothing more than any other player--it's all preference; just like chosing a language: Ruby, python, C++, Java they all do nothing more than Basic, right? Just user preference. Of course, once they have USED all those languages, most programmers recognize that there is more to it than simple syntax and don't choose Basic.

  46. ... Is Bliss by meehawl · · Score: 1

    the iTunes application for managing your music is leaps and bounds better than the alternatives.

    You're justified in saying that only if you've never used Media Center.

    --

    Da Blog
  47. Rockbox by meehawl · · Score: 1

    I can zip really quickly down to the approximate area, then slow down, and zero in on the right one.

    With Rockbox I get to do that on several different players, and more importantly I get to specify the amount of scroll acceleration and "inertia" I like. But don't worry, the Rockbox Ipod port is progressing nicely...

    --

    Da Blog
  48. Question to the iPod knowing/using crowd by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I get the rave about the iPod. It is a cool device and the facts go for it. Lot's of other player's don't hold up and simply look like rushed to market. Even the sleek ones from Philips or Sony.

    Yet I have a question to the ones using the iPod - especially those who've used another player before:

    Is this a potential competitor? It's practically bloated with features most of which the iPod lacks. Controlls look a generation or two behind iPod and the video display is smaller but all the rest seems really cool. What do you say? Potential competitor to iPod (especially if one likes the features) or not?

    Opinions and experiences please (que below). Thanks.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Question to the iPod knowing/using crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Less is more. That is the main secret to the iPods success. Do one set of things, and do it better than anyone else. By not throwing in every feature including the kitchen sink, the interface is uncluttered and uncomplicated.


      Also, size matters. I find it interesting they don't show anyone holding it - only the little remote that also has a screen (WTF?). That's not a good sign... Apple is fanatical about size. So much so in ditching firewire on the latest iPods, which among other things has crazy people like JC Dvorak interpreting it that Apple is building up to ditch Mac OSX for Windows (again, WTF?)


      Apple designs for the whole experience, not checklists or in reaction to competitors. They build stuff that normal people want to use and that you can leave with your mother without having to provide tech support after the fact.

    2. Re:Question to the iPod knowing/using crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like someone else said above. The iPod just has a better interface. Sure, it's sleek and stylish, but if an average joe can't pick it up and figure out how to use it within a minute, it's not gonna win. The iPod's success in Japan bears this out. The Japanese love their gadgets; they love the fact that it's so damn easy to use. This iAudio X5 looks like it has everything but the kitchen sink, but if I can't swipe my thumb and listen to whatever I want, I'm not gonna buy it.

      These companies still think having a laundry list of features will kill the iPod. It won't.

      If they make a better interface than the iPod's, then they might have a chance.

    3. Re:Question to the iPod knowing/using crowd by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Hmm, it depends. What is it's software like?

      With the iPod, you can download and use iTunes for free. You can download JetAudio basic, but need to buy JetAudio plus.. and it mentions JetShell for the X5.

      With iTunes, at least, you can use it also on Mac or PC; it looks like JetAudio and JetShell is PC only...

    4. Re:Question to the iPod knowing/using crowd by nigham · · Score: 1

      I think I'd buy it. What I need from an audio player is good platform/codec support. This thing runs OGG and FLAC, and works on Linux.

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
    5. Re:Question to the iPod knowing/using crowd by Jesselnz · · Score: 1

      I have a 20 gig X5, and I love it. The interface takes a few minutes to get used to, but it's definately not hard to use. And the voice recorder really comes in handy. I haven't used it to play videos, the screen resolution seems too small to really enjoy watching stuff. It might be useful for anime fans though.

      Unfortunately, I don't think it can compete with Apple. For one thing, there's no option to browse your music using id3 tags, you have to use a file tree browser. Plus it's not compatible with any online music stores that use drm. It's a cool geek toy, but not ready for the mainstream.

  49. Entity Japan has been assimilated by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1
    I think I heard this message on my shortwave radio this afternoon:
    Ipod Borg PSPs

    Which translated
    We are the Ipod Borg. Lower your PSPs. We will add your biological and technological knowledge to our own. You must conform. You must consume. You must obey.


    /winces at how the iPod has already destroyed the Japanese language.
    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  50. Lies, damn lies and statistics... by McFadden · · Score: 1
    Depends on how you look at the figures. They make a big play of market-share, which of course is important, but underplay the actual sales - plus, music capable phones handsets are considerably more widespread than many other territories. Virtually all handsets from the 3 main networks now contain mp3/music playing features by default.

    If you look a bit closer, the article states that 4.1 million ipods were sold during 2005, whereas in a roughly similiar period (since November 2004) almost 6 million people have mp3 capable phones on one network alone (and the network they focused on - "au" is only Japan's second largest, DoCoMo being the biggest). It would be interesting to see what happens to Apple's share of the market when you factor in devices such as mp3 phones and PSPs both of which people use as a music player. Sure Apple's performance is impressive, especially for a non-Japanese firm, but it's not quite as clear cut as people are making out.

  51. I'd rather decide myself by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

    I dunno, I guess that could work for some people, but most of the time I say to myself "I think I'm in the mood for some System of a Down today" and so I copy over some System of a Down. It takes me maybe 5 seconds of effort and I am getting EXACTLY what I desire at that very moment. Compare that to plugging in and hoping that my ratings and preferences magically produce what I want to hear... if I want a surprise, I'll listen to the radio--which, of course, is an option on my MP3 player, but not on the iPod. I'm also not really thrilled about the idea of reducing the bitrate. 128 (iTMS standard, IIRC) is as low as I'd want to go anyway.

    1. Re:I'd rather decide myself by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      No one said you ever had to stick to iTMS or 128kbps. My stuff is 160kbps from my own collection of roughly 100 CDs.

      Sometimes I want to decide; it's why I have a 30gb player but only 6gb of music. Most of the time I just want background music, so I let the iPod surprise me.

  52. Gee. Japan fell for DRM en masse. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    How predictable.

    Music is now co-owned by Apple and the RIAA, and the musicians are still getting screwed. --We had the opportunity to embrace a beautiful and fair system of music distribution; to download high-quality MP3's directly from the bands and give them donations based on the honor-system. Heck, we still have this opportunity. Instead people have voted with their actions to be unscrupulous and in need of governments and corporations to control their behavior. And the artists still get screwed.

    Hooray for Humanity.


    -FL

  53. I finally figured out what Apple remindes me of! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Apple products remind me of Japanese 'Cute'.

    --You know? That ultra-shiny, candy-coated, plasticy soul-less condescending crap which bears zero resemblance to the real world?

    Except Apple adds one more dimension; The death-star finish and the distinct feel of something alien and creepy. Like a Membari space cruiser, but one which wants to force DRM down your throat and still not pay the artists.

    Ah, Apple and Japanese culture. Dumbed down for the Pod-People.


    -FL

  54. As an Apple stockholder for several years now... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    As an Apple stockholder for several years now, two words come to mind:

    CHIC-CHING!

  55. MOD PARENT UP! by John+Muir · · Score: 1

    Bravo. One of the better cultural posts I've seen (yet alone on Slashdot) and a guaranteed +1 insightful if only my mod points had come today instead of Wednesday!

    A lot of crazy babble is spoken about the Japanese by Americans especially, even/especially on the pro-Japanese side as though it were Narnia or something. It does everyone better to also occasionally let in some common sense and try to understand other people in the same way they do themselves.

  56. Prince Charles... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Upon visiting the US the most recent time:

    "I'm surprised at how thin everyone is."

    See, European see the US reports that Americans are all fat. And they believe it. They generalize it.

    In general, I've found one thing that is most common about Americans (perhaps it's true of others too). Most of them think they're smarter than average and so they say things like "Americans generally are the type to make broad generalizations" as if people from other countries weren't.

    I have to go with the other poster. It is possible to make meaningful generalizations about a populace without implying it is true of every person.

    How about "Chinese have black hair"? How about "Japanese are shorter than Americans"? How about "Japanese eat more beef (or whale meat) than other Pacific Asians"?

    All meaningful, all generalizations, and all are useful for certain purposes (deciding what size clothes to produce or where to try to export your beef).

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:Prince Charles... by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      Upon visiting the US the most recent time: "I'm surprised at how thin everyone is."

      Heh, he obviously didn't visit the Midwest! :-p

      I have to go with the other poster. It is possible to make meaningful generalizations about a populace without implying it is true of every person.

      Yeah, I agree. But I think when one catches oneself making such a generalization, even if it's a broad one and one that is statistically accurate, they ought to take a moment and reflect if they're letting generalizations influence their overall opinions about a culture/race/country/nationality/etc.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  57. Plus Korea by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


    Isn't the Nano built with Korean Flash?

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  58. Appears things are same, just the media's changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most were using them for Japanese pop music ripped from CDs

    When I went to Japan, I checked out many rental shops since they sold fairly recent releases (former rentals,) for pretty cheap. They pretty much all had this setup: all the new CD releases on one shelf, and blank tapes on the next shelf.

    This was in the early 90s, I wouldn't be surprised if that shelf of blank tapes gave way to blank Minidiscs, and perhaps joined by CDRs. Today there's probably also a rack of iPod accessories as people switch from renting & dubbing to renting & ripping.

    And as long as Japanese CDs continue to sell for $25-$30 and up, I don't expect consumers' practices to change.

  59. Only 2000 would sell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's because only 2000 was produced.

    And if Kitty isn't your thing, How about Doraemon?

  60. emacs iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *shudder*