Slashdot Mirror


Unpleasant Surprises for Online Real Estate Buyers

prostoalex writes "Buying expensive items online from the people you've never met without any guarantees on the seller's part might seem a bit risky even for an experienced Internet shopper. The 'hotness' of the real estate investment market apparently influences some cash-heavy investors to look for opportunities online. When the entire transaction is done via a click of the mouse, and the deed for newly bought real estate arrives in the mail, some unsuspecting buyers might discover that a cozy house near the bus line in the middle of a busy street might imply a criminalized neighborhood and proximity to crack house. The New York Times investigates negative experiences of people buying investment real estate online."

240 comments

  1. In other news: water is wet. by SlashTon · · Score: 0


    This really surprises anyone? I thought terms like "ideal for a DYIer!" have always meant "about to collapse" ?

    1. Re:In other news: water is wet. by baryon351 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > This really surprises anyone? I thought terms like "ideal for a DYIer!" have always meant "about to collapse" ?

      It surprises many people. There are plenty of people who, when faced by something that looks like a bargain, or looks like they're getting a good deal & ripping off the buyer will jump at a business chance without thinking things through, because the scammer has successfully planted an image in the buyer/victim's own mind. Imaginations are a powerful thing, and work against the victim.

      A relative of mine (no relation apart from by marriage) came across his first nigerian scammer email a couple of years ago. He spent days thinking over the options and planning how to rip nigerianscammerguy off of all his money, instead of just getting 10% of the $50million promised.

      I gave the guy a handy hint, advised him it's a scam and these guys will just try to take money from him and keep promising but never delivering. That's when he said he knew it must be a scam, and unveiled some 'foolproof' plan to get the money from the nigerianscammerguy but not reveal who he was or send them much money at all.

      Eventually, he ended up losing about $2500 to the scammers getting played right into their game. Why? While he knew it was a scam, he made the stupid mistake of believing the $50 million actually existed. It clouded his vision, and all he could see was a mental image of his bank statement with 7 digits in the black. Same with real estate, the buyers make an image in their mind of what they're buying, and don't lose it - even buyers of property who get to inspect it will see what they want to, unless there are major differences between description and reality.

    2. Re:In other news: water is wet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's not imagination, that's just "greed", plain and simple. The 80s seem to have helped people forget that greed is generally a Very Bad Thing (one of the seven deadly sins and all...)

    3. Re:In other news: water is wet. by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just bought a house. (not online) One word of advice.. even if you see the property, hire a property inspector. A good one will tell you about all kinds of things like leaking plumbing in the crawl space, dry rot in the roof sheeting, and wireing splices not up to code. I bought my place knowing ahead of time one of the underground sprinklers was broken, the hot tub didn't work, a bad splice in the attic (twisted and taped), and the sub panel for the shop didn't meet code (3 wire service without a seprate ground in a sub panel is not permitted). It is true the house had a few things needing fixing, but the inspection report got $8,000 knocked off due to the extra expenses needed to bring it up to code in addition to the seller having an electrician update the panel.

      Use the online yellow pages and find a home inspector. They will provide photos of everyting from the condition of the gutters to the torn screen window, to the rotting bottem panel on the garage door. It was worth every cent of the $750 I paid for the inspection.

      Get a licensed home inspector.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:In other news: water is wet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:In other news: water is wet. by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      Do however be wary of housing inspectors recommended to you by your real estate agent; they may not have much of an interest in making you aware of things that might threaten or delay the transaction.

    6. Re:In other news: water is wet. by hey! · · Score: 1

      That's the way that the human mind works. Once it believes something, or decides to do something, it takes energy to move it off its current track. Sometimes lots of energy.

      We feel emotions about things that have to do with our well being; part of their function is to give us behioral options when thinking doesn't work too well, and in fact they preclude effective thinking. For example when somebody jumps out at us with a knife, we react with fear or anger, which is better than considering our options. If we tried to consider our options we'd probably fail, until we managed to calm ourselves. One property of strong emotional states is that we just don't assimilate new information while in their grip. Researchers call this period in which strong emotion sustains itsef by reducing your ability to perceive or use new information a "refractory period".

      Your story strikes me as a classic example of this phenomenon, and in this case the emotion was greed. It's easy enough in the light of cold reason to see that nobody with 50 million in cash needs to scam $2500 from some anonymous Internet user. Once in the grip of a strong emotion, it's much harder than it sounds to reason this out because strong emotion by it's nature deranges the reasoning faculties. This person may normally be too intelligent to be fooled by a scam like this, if it were presented as something happening to a somebody else.

      It's probably not be true that you can't cheat an honest man, but it is certainly much easier to cheat a greedy one.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:In other news: water is wet. by martinX · · Score: 1

      That's brilliant. Do you remind him of it at family gatherings? "And my cousin, Bob - that's him over there - actually lost money to these scammers! What a doofus!"

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    8. Re:In other news: water is wet. by Technician · · Score: 1

      be wary of housing inspectors recommended to you by your real estate agent

      Good point. Most important is to check them out first regardless of where you find them. Check the BBB. Check refrences. A good one is worth every penny.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    9. Re:In other news: water is wet. by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "This really surprises anyone? "

      i'm shocked anyone was stupid enough to send thousands of dollars for items they've never seen in person.

      I bought a car on ebay once. No money was sent until I actually flew there and had the seller pick me up from the airport in the car. I checked it out that nite and it was fine, and i drove it home the following day.

      30,000 miles later and the car's still great, hasnt needed any repairs.

      I say "Caveat emptor", I'm tired of people and the courts defending stupid people who do stupid things.

      I love the quotes from some of these people!
      ""You get lulled into a false sense of security with the name eBay, then get scammed in a big way," she said. "If it wasn't eBay, I wouldn't have gone ahead with it.""

      " "I told him the first thing he did wrong was buy a computer," Mr. Krug said."

      LOL! yes, it's the computer's fault!!

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  2. Buffalo, NY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Buffalo has been particularly hard hit by online flipping, as the city's persistent population decline and high foreclosure rates have created a glut of some 20,000 vacant houses."

    Lots of fresh water, summer temps don't go above 90, winter temps above 0, sports teams, cheap housing...
    I never could understand why Phoenix is gaining population and Buffalo is losing population.

    1. Re:Buffalo, NY by CrazyTalk · · Score: 5, Funny

      As someone who grew up in Buffalo, I can sum it up in one word - jobs. OK, maybe two words - jobs and snow.

    2. Re:Buffalo, NY by Jon_S · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, just the one word was right. Jobs. I have lived in Boston and the San Francisco Bay area and Buffalo is where I prefer... if you can get a good job. Perfect quality of life and climate (the snow is no big deal, not much different from when I grew up in Boston, and besides, it makes for great skiing). And as the article indirectly points out, real estate is very cheap. While only a fool would buy a house sight unseen in the East Side, my half acre lot with a beautiful ranch house and mature trees in an idyllic walkable community is only about $140,000 according to the bank. Of course, the reason things are so cheap is because of the lack of jobs.

      I like to have people repeat the snow boogieman line, though. It helps keep the riff raff out!

    3. Re:Buffalo, NY by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "winter temps above 0"
      Easy change that to winter temps above 40 and you have a winner.
      Cold is one of the reasons. The other is that the north east outside of Boston and New York City have a bad reputation. There are lots of areas with low cost housing and a good quality of life that are having the same type of problems as Buffalo.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Buffalo, NY by frost22 · · Score: 1

      0 or 40 what ?

      (ahem .. you are using SI units, are you ? )

      --
      ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    5. Re:Buffalo, NY by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Frankly I don't like centigrade any better than fahrenheit when it comes to measuring temperatures! We don't have negative lengths or weights so why temperatures? Let's just all use K and be done with it!
      Anyway since it was about Buffalo, NY I was using the measurement that is common in Buffalo NY which is fahrenheit. If I was posting about Canada or Australia I would have used metric.

      BTW the logic behind both the centigrade scale and the fahrenheit scale are pretty similar.
      For fahrenheit 0 was the coldest temperature they could generate they set scale so that temperatures that water froze and that it boiled to be 180 degrees apart. Makes sense since when you think in terms of degrees.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Buffalo, NY by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "As someone who grew up in Buffalo, I can sum it up in one word - jobs. OK, maybe two words - jobs and snow."

      Just too freakin' COLD up there!! I think that is why so many 'snow birds' are moving to the west and deep south.

      Hell, I've been wearing shorts and short sleeved shirts for over 2 mos. now....however, in the next couple of months, when humidity and heat hits...well, let's just say I think we need to erect a monument to whoever invented air conditioning....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:Buffalo, NY by PunkXRock · · Score: 1

      As someone else who lived in Buffalo for many years, I have a different word. It's not snow (though people who downplay that are delusional), and while jobs are an issue, it's not jobs. No, that word is "gray" (or "grey", if you prefer). It is so disgustingly GRAY in Buffalo, for far too many days and months of the year. So why Phoenix and not Buffalo? Because people like color.

    8. Re:Buffalo, NY by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      I grew up in Buffalo and still visit occasionally. You're right: The place really does potentially have a lot going for it. Unfortunately, it also has city and county governments that have not been able to hunker down and make the decisions that need to be made to overcome its problems and get things moving in some coherent direction.

      It's sad, really, because 100 years ago Buffalo was arguably the most technologically advanced major city in the U.S., largely because of its proximity to hydroelectricity from Niagara Falls, Great Lakes shipping routes, and the Erie Canal. A lot of industry built up there for those reasons, and unfortunately the area has thus suffered disproportionately during America's industrial decline. They still have the Niagara riverfront and the Erie lakefront, though, and if they can transform those resources (like some other rustbelt cities have done), there may be hope for them yet. Or so I'd like to think.

    9. Re:Buffalo, NY by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      The snow in Buffalo falls mainly in the... "Southtowns". That's where the lake effect snow comes off of Lake Erie, and they get absolutely dumped on every winter. Several good ski resorts there, though, so it's very nice if you're into that sort of thing. They're also pretty good at removing the stuff from their roads; I've seen 4 inches of snow cause more panic in D.C. than two feet in Springville, NY.

    10. Re:Buffalo, NY by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      True, but north of the city (where I am from) gets plenty of snow too - certainly more than Phoneix or LA! :-)

    11. Re:Buffalo, NY by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I heard that 100 degrees F was the tempurature of the guys mouth (forget his name), and zero was the coldest tempurature they could get (ice mixed with alcohol BTW).

      Just anecdotal though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:Buffalo, NY by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      the Zero temp is correct but the value of a degree is based on 180 units between freezing and boiling. If two directions are 180 degrees apart they are exactly opposite. The fact that the normal human body temperature is close to 100, 98.6 was more or less a happy accident. Centigrade is just using the freezing point of water as 0 and boiling as 100. It almost doesn't make any sense to call them degrees since they are base 10.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Buffalo, NY by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Buffalo has been particularly hard hit by online flipping And I thought cow tipping was bad enough offline :/

  3. Check it out first, dammit by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you buy something as expensive as a house without even bothering to take a look at it beforehand, you can't blame anyone but yourself. This is not a piece of bread -- you can't just shrug and throw it away.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:Check it out first, dammit by babbling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Damn right. In fact, any money spent online that doesn't go to well-established companies should always be money that you are willing to lose. There's never any guarantees about ebay sellers unless they have exceptional feedback for a LOT of auctions. (some dodgy sellers may "sell items" to friends to get positive feedback, before scamming other people)

      Of course, some people deserve to lose their money more than others. I have far more sympathy for the bloke that lost $50 in a dodgy ebay auction than I do for someone who purchased property online without having seen it.

    2. Re:Check it out first, dammit by ROOK*CA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Damn right. In fact, any money spent online that doesn't go to well-established companies should always be money that you are willing to lose.

      Great point, I think I would take it even farther, when dealing with anybody less than a well-established company on the net, you should EXPECT to get ripped-off and take appropriate measures to protect yourself BEFORE you buy. Way too many people just assume that the government (or some other 3rd party) will protect them from fraud on the net, which IMHO is just plain foolish.

    3. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's the penny stock investor mentality. They see these properties listed for 10k and think "Wow, what a bargain!" and then they don't bother to check if the property has any liens or structural code violations. Same thing with the idiots who buy "historic" homes only to be shocked with municipal restrictions when they try to renovate the property.

      This current RE bubble is going to end in such a disaster I can't even contemplate how the US will ever work its way out recession that follows. The whole damn economy is built around suburban expansion and people borrowing against their homes. Anyone have a financial bomb shelter??

    4. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least with V14gr4 you know what you're getting !

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    5. Re:Check it out first, dammit by archeopterix · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you buy something as expensive as a house without even bothering to take a look at it beforehand, you can't blame anyone but yourself. This is not a piece of bread -- you can't just shrug and throw it away.
      Agreed. One shoud also bear in mind that:

      • Running with unprotected scissors is dangerous, especially so if wearing high heels and running downstairs.
      • American football is played with an oval ball.
      • Starting a land war in Russia during the winter leads to defeat.
      • You can teach a dog to do tricks, but it takes a long time for an oak tree to grow.
    6. Re:Check it out first, dammit by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right -- but, the root of the problem is that "common sense" is the biggest misnomer.

      You can dismiss some people as fools, but bear in mind that even we who usurp a mental superiority behave like idiots most of the time as well. Even me and you.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    7. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an American football is actually an elipsoid.

    8. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Threni · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > I can't even contemplate how the US will ever work its way out recession that
      > follows

      Stop buying expensive crap and learn to live happily and simply? I'm just guessing, but I doubt people from rich countries are any happier than people from poor countries. It doesn't cost much to survive in beautiful places like South Thailand, and it costs a fortune to live in stinky, dirty, crime-ridden London or New York. When did you ever go somewhere beautiful and see photos of cities with the slogan "get away from it all - go to London", for instance?

    9. Re:Check it out first, dammit by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The problem won't be not buying expensive crap, it will be paying off the leveraged bet on expensive asset prices, if they were to decline. Not buying the expensive crap will sort of come naturally.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    10. Re:Check it out first, dammit by bigberk · · Score: 1

      The reason they're not checking out what they're buying is similar to the reason nobody checks out the health of a company before buying stock in it, during hot streaks in the stock market (e.g. 1997-2000 - slashdot you remember that one, and now 2003-2006 for housing/financial stocks).

      During investment manias, people get caught up in the "urgency" to buy something (like tech stocks) and don't do the appropriate research. Real estate has been on a hot streak due to easy credit, and many of these investors are looking to quickly flip property -- again, very similar to flipping internet stocks. You don't really care what you're buying, since you hope to flip the asset quickly to some "greater fool".

      The greatest fools however are the ones flipping assets late in the stages of an asset bubble, and I need not point out that slashdot users probably learned this lesson well in the past. Unfortunately the people now doing essentially the same thing with real estate will also learn their lesson, and be left "holding the bag" with those shiatty properties.

    11. Re:Check it out first, dammit by badfish99 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't know about New Yaok, but I've met lots of people from Thailand who have come to work in London. It may be stinky but it's much easier to make a living there, even though things are more expensive.

      The weather is better too: not so hot.

    12. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      I've met lots of people from Thailand who have come to work in London.
      And judging from all the cards in phone booths last time I was there, they're all prostitutes and most of them are ladyboys.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    13. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Wow that is bad advice.

      If you are going to spend over 5 figures on ANYTHING you had better get it appraised, inspected by a professional and completely checked out.

      Fools buy things by looking at it themselves. Hell I can show you a house that looks like it is brand new but is a giant POS that only a moron would buy. Do you have the tools to look in the walls and see the massive termite damage? the dry rot on the foundation that is hidden by a beautiful remodel? or the fact that coming up here in the rain season the basement will have 3-6 inches of standing water in it for months because of faulty drainage? All of that can not be "seen" but only a professional inspection can uncover.

      you hire the inspector and never use a reccomended one from the seller or agent. hire the guy that will be brutal so you get a real picture. If the inspection does not take 3+ hours then it was half assed and you need to get another one.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Check it out first, dammit by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > This current RE bubble is going to end in such a disaster I can't even contemplate how the US will
      > ever work its way out recession that follows...Anyone have a financial bomb shelter??

      Depressingly enough, probably the only "financial bomb shelter" is to invest your money in areas that will benefit from a real estate bust.

      The problem is that too many people today believe that "flipping houses" is an easy way to get rich, just like the way people talked about day trading back in the late 1990s.

      Too many people today believe the surefire way to get rich is to buy an almost dilapidated house on mortgage, do some cosmetic repairs, paint the house a neutral Pottery Barn color, add a granite countertop, a tile backsplash, and some stainless steel appliances. Do it all for as cheap as possible, and then sell it for a huge profit before the first payment is due. There are so many shows on television that show this, that way too many people are getting into this.

      I've seen quite a few houses in my neighborhood go like this. A house goes on sale, and someone picks it up. Suddenly the landscaping improves and the trim is painted a different color (but that ominous rotting wood on the trim on the side remains), and before long, there's a cheap cardboard sign proclaiming something like, "A++ Realtors -- $0 Down/Willing to Finance 100%." There was a beautiful two story house with a graceful front yard and cathedral picture windows in the front that used to be a nice house. After no fewer than four owners in eight years, it's a wreck.

      All of this reminds me of the (probably apocryphal) quote of Joseph Kennedy about getting out of the stock market in the late 1920s when the shoeshine boys were talking about which stocks to buy.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    15. Re:Check it out first, dammit by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      When most people buy a house they need a loan, one of the conditions of the loan is that the house appraizes for the loan amount so being taken is a lot harder when your playing with the banks money, so all that realy happened to anyone buying a crack house is that the house he thought he could fix up and sell for more turned out to be a house that won't be able to sell for more until 10 years down the road they neighborhood gets revitalized. If anyone that dumb had enough money to pay cash then they obvisouly got it from one of two sources: the lottery so the buyer didn't realy lose anything it just means he can't lose the money else where, two Loan Shark Larry in which case his best bet would be to leave town now.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    16. Re:Check it out first, dammit by onepoint · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>Same thing with the idiots who buy "historic" homes only to be shocked with municipal restrictions when they try to renovate the property.

      Historic Renovation is something that I did once ( I like to restore Victorians ). I will NEVER do a historic home again.

      I could take a Victorian, restore it fully without using anything new ( maybe slight plumbing issues, but everything original and old ) and finish without a problem within 48 days. ( I had the best crew and we always worked 6 days a week ).

      the only historic I did ( 1898 home ) took me 13 months from start to finish, it was mostly waiting for inspectors and approvals. NIGHTMARE, I would tell everyone to stay out of that market unless they have the ability to deal with government and local bullsh*t. Like they know the color of a house back then when I have the original paint sample from some of the timber.... uuhhgg what a-holes.

      Michael

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    17. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is an ellipsoid not an oval?

      Come on, be my google-monkey.

    18. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      This also happens offline. There was a story about 4 months ago in the CLeveland Plain Dealer (The archives aren't free from that far back, so no link) about a woman who was talked into investing in 4 houses in Cleveland. She bought 4 houses, no money down, using her decent credit, sight unseen. I think she paid (well, owes) about 200K for the 4 houses. Turns out the houses were worth about 40K total for all 4. I don't know what came of it- I think they were trying to go after the guy who talked her into it as well as the lenders.
      Caveat Emptor. Could you imagine going 200K into debt for properties you have never seen?
      Also, if I remember right, this woman didn't have much income. So it begs the question, how are people able to finamce these purchases? (I don't mean how does it work- I understand the financing- I mean, how can the system be set up to allow this?)

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    19. Re:Check it out first, dammit by drwho · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Damn right. In fact, any money spent online that doesn't go to well-established companies should always be money that you are willing to lose.

      This is an idiotic statement. There are plenty of good companies and individuals which are 'less well known'. Your ultra-conservative sentiment means you'll often end up paying more, getting less, and wondering why there's practical monopolies in the economy. Beyond this, even well known brands can be rip-offs - Radio Shack for instance, has knowningly sold completely defective products and left the consumer in the lurch. Enron and Parmalat were household names. Your statment is similar to the one "You get what you pay for" - which is also untrue and even dangerous. You pay what you negotiate, through some method or another.

      This isn't to say that your sentiments aren't useful. If you and others spread the FUD about small companies, there will be less competition on ebay for the really good deals.

    20. Re: Check it out first, dammit by gidds · · Score: 1
      You forgot the most important one: If you change horses in the middle of the stream without a paddle, you might find that the broth is spoilt before it's hatched out of the bag.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    21. Re:Check it out first, dammit by drwho · · Score: 1

      The way the govermint (read: The FRB) is going to get the country out from the insanly high mortgages now being paid, once the market collapses, is to debase the currency. I mean massive inflation. Suddenly, that $2500/mo mortage will seem like peanuts and the administration will stay in power.

      The other thing that's interesting is that the economy is moving from one based upon capital to one based upon debt. Americans, supposedly, owe more on credit cards than their net worth - as a whole (not the average!). This, combined with insane mortgages, and huge trade and federal budget defecits, will eventually weaken the military power of the United States, which is why it was allowed to happen in the first place. Americans are basically being sucked into the biggest usury racket ever.

    22. Re:Check it out first, dammit by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I concur, although the problem with that strategy is that it only works once, and the side effects generally are worse than the disease. Essentially no one will loan you any money again for a very long time. Especially if the world's reserve currency is the one that did the devaluation. Are you thinking farmland?

      All fiat currencies (essentially all global currencies) are based on debt (or credit). Shoot that's printed on the bills for goodness sakes.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    23. Re:Check it out first, dammit by shane_rimmer · · Score: 1

      But, only slightly less well known is this: "Never go in against a Sicilian, when death is on the line!"

    24. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Basically the people that talk about the real estate bubble have no clue how real estate works... They have been talking about this "bubble" for like 15 years now...and yet it still hasnt burst yet...maybe because real estate is sustainable.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    25. Re:Check it out first, dammit by babbling · · Score: 1

      I didn't really meant for it to be taken that way. I just meant that with companies that are not well known, there's not much that can be done if your money disappears, and you can't be 100% sure that you will receive what you paid for.

      I'd still bid on good deals, but I wouldn't throw thousands of dollars at them unless the seller had an excellent (and long) feedback profile.

    26. Re:Check it out first, dammit by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Neither Enron or Parmalot ripped customers off with shoddy products. (In fact, Enron didn't even sell products.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    27. Re:Check it out first, dammit by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      That 'buy houses and fix them to make money' concept is completely idiotic. There are companies that make money that way, but they own construction workers and actually know when 'fixer uppers' can be fixed up. (And they've already bought the good ones.) And if you have a lot of money, buying real estate as an investment makes sense, especially if you pay attention to where cities are expanding and buy from landowners who are not. Own it for five years, and then sell it, you can sometimes double your money. And if you do that, while you own the house, you might as well fix it up. But you should only invest in those with actual value to start with. (And while you're at it, rent it.)

      However, thinking you can improve the price of a house by more than the cost of overhead and repairs is a risk. Sure, it might work, but it might not. It is, like you said, exactly akin to day trading. Buying stock as investment makes sense. Buying and selling stock constantly is a good way to lose all your money to overhead.

      People don't realize there's a reason that 'slightly-broken' houses are cheaper than the cost to fix them up: 95% of people do not want to live in such houses. Unless you fix them up perfectly, they will continue to be slightly-broken houses and hence almost valueless thanks to supply and demand. Unless you are a construction worker skilled in every area of construction, you cannot fix them up perfectly.

      At least with stock, you can't buy it with a loan, you don't have property taxes, you don't have to hire contractors, and you don't have to try six months to sell it. Just stick with day trading, at least there you can only lose money you have, you put in 2000 dollars and end up with 0. With houses, you can end up having a mortgage and property taxes, every month, until you manage to offload the house at less than you paid for it, and then you have to finishing paying off the mortgage excess!

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    28. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      They have been talking about this "bubble" for like 15 years now...

      Really?? Because I clearly remember a severe recession 15 years ago along with the fallout from the S&L crisis. RE was dead money for a good 7 years and a lot of speculators took a bath ... Trump's bankruptcy being the most famous. The current inflation in RE prices is not sustainable because the foundation upon which they were built is crumbling (shoddy lending standards and low interest rates).

      minimum credit card payment law + bankruptcy law + tighter lending standards + rising interest rates + death of the carry trade + rising homeowners insurance + property taxes = a lot of cattle are about to be slaughtered

    29. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Eivind · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's cost benefit.

      On smaller purchases (not houses, unless you're a multi-millionaire) you can afford to lose a few, aslong as the expected gain is still positive.

      I buy used ps2-games online. I *expect* to be ripped off once in a while. That's ok -- compared to the alternative for me, buying new in the shop, I typically save 20->70%, so even if I'm ripped off 1/10th of the time, it's still a huge win.

      But like always: don't gamble what you cannot afford to lose. I *can* afford to lose the cost of a used game. Most people *cannot* afford to lose a significant portion or all of the money they invest in a house.

    30. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      so basically the recession was a big deal for mega lenders and scammers like trump...big deal

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    31. Re:Check it out first, dammit by eldepeche · · Score: 1

      An oval is two-dimensional and an ellipsoid is three-dimensional.

    32. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3-dimensional what?

      My guess is 3-d oval, keeping it in the category of oval, especially in the non-jargon sense of the term.

    33. Re:Check it out first, dammit by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      Way too many people just assume that the government (or some other 3rd party) will protect them from fraud on the net, which IMHO is just plain foolish.

      These days, it's foolish to expect the government to protect you from anything, unless you're paying into the campaign funds of the "right" people...

    34. Re:Check it out first, dammit by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Great point, and I would take it further, and suggest the well-established companies will rip you off half the time too.

    35. Re:Check it out first, dammit by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      If you've got really good credit, lenders are willing to overlook things a little - such as your income and such.

      Also, some less-than-reputable lenders will try to slip you a bad ARM or balloon loan. Sure, the interest-only payment on $200k could be as low as $700-1000, depending on the current rate. That doesn't sound too bad. But then if you aren't careful, the payment could increase when the loan enters its adjustment period, or maybe you'll get socked with a huge bill to cover all the principle you haven't been paying - and if you can't make the payment, you lose the house(s) AND STILL owe the lender the money.

      A win-win situation for the lender.

    36. Re:Check it out first, dammit by bigberk · · Score: 1
      I can't even contemplate how the US will ever work its way out recession that follows. The whole damn economy is built around suburban expansion and people borrowing against their homes. Anyone have a financial bomb shelter??
      You're not the only one who warns about this. So does the Federal Reserve themselves, and other central banks worldwide. They all know that once credit dries up or overleveraged speculation starts to unravel, we are headed for financial chaos.

      My 'financial bomb shelter' is: staying heavily in cash/t-bills, NOT stocks or bond funds, owning some physical gold and foreign currencies
    37. Re:Check it out first, dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Us cannot use inflation to get out of high property prices because it has too much foreign debt which it won't be able to afford if it deflates it's currency.

    38. Re:Check it out first, dammit by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      I think you're misenterpreting what he said. He's not saying don't do any business with anyone online, he's only saying that if you're not dealing with a company you trust, than you should proceed with caution. I definitly agree with you that sometimes you can get a bargain by dealing with some unknowns, but you have to be careful when doing so. You should be prepared to lose your money. Buying real estate site unseen is clearly a risk. I'm not saying to never do it, but only do it if you're prepared to lose your money.

      --
      No Sigs!
  4. Can anyone name a dumber thing to buy online? by ereshiere · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Real estate, of all things, is something that someone should look at first. Is the entire world becoming a shut-in?

    1. Re:Can anyone name a dumber thing to buy online? by brewer13210 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully morons who spend their money in ways like this will soon be parted from it...removing their ability to make bone-head big ticket purchases and complaining about it afterwords.

      Todd

    2. Re:Can anyone name a dumber thing to buy online? by castoridae · · Score: 1

      Not always. Many foreclosure sales are done without the ability to see the property (at least other than a cursory outside view). Sometimes the location covers the price regardless of the building, and often a developer will just knock down any existing buildings anyway.

      That said, you better know the area well if you're going to do this.

    3. Re:Can anyone name a dumber thing to buy online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine people doing this aren't interested in finding a home. They're more likely to be real estate speculators looking for cheap investments. It's this decade's version of day trading.

    4. Re:Can anyone name a dumber thing to buy online? by gronofer · · Score: 1

      I'm puzzled at how they manage to get hold of so much money in the first place. I suppose they borrow it.

    5. Re:Can anyone name a dumber thing to buy online? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      >>Many foreclosure sales are done without the ability to see the property

      this is very true, but when purchasing Foreclosures, you really look at land value then add the home value. this way you know what the worst case situation is. best case is when you get to purchase below land value. then you can flip it as a handy man special.

      yes I buy foreclosures, and no it's not easy, and yes it's very time consuming, and yes it's worth it.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  5. PLEASE BE HELPING ME by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    i have 50 million of your american dollers stored in bank account.
    my bank manager (mr arran) tells me i need an american to sign them over.
    if you can help me to withdraw it from bank i will give you 40 percant.
    yes, thats right i said 40 percant. you will get a whole 15million american dollers for helping me.
    sinerity yours
    mr wamo

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:PLEASE BE HELPING ME by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Damn scam artist! He assumed I couldn't do basic math and that he could scam me out of 5 Mil!

      Oh, wait...

    2. Re:PLEASE BE HELPING ME by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

      sorry i forget writing in last letter. hope you will not misunderstand.

      i need your bank account number and alongside password to move the money.

      yours
      mr wamo

  6. Darwin in action by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you drop $100K on something sight unseen, you deserve whatever you get.

    Even a picture isnt enough-- there was a house in our neighborhood where the owner kept over 100 rabbits. With free run of the place. The house looked okay from the outside, maybe worth $260,000. But my friend the real-estate appraiser valued it at -$22000. That's how much it would cost to tear down the house, minus the value of the land.

    1. Re:Darwin in action by babbling · · Score: 1

      Then your friend the real-estate appraiser should go back to high school before making any important financial decisions.

      The land was actually worth $238,000, that is, the value of the land minus what it would cost to tear the house down.

    2. Re:Darwin in action by acvh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I read this article yesterday - the guy bought a house for THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS! Come on, you can't buy a good used car for that. All this article really tells us is that a leech who was trying to flip houses for a quick profit got burned by a bigger leech.

    3. Re:Darwin in action by igny · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about used cars, but I have a used bridge located on East coast of USA, which I can sell to you for mere $2999.95

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Darwin in action by spiritraveller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All this article really tells us is that a leech who was trying to flip houses for a quick profit got burned by a bigger leech.

      It's not being a leech to buy something that you think is undervalued by the seller. Quite the opposite. It has the effect of smoothing out pricing in a market and making it more liquid.

      No need to be jealous of those who find good deals before you do.

    5. Re:Darwin in action by moonbender · · Score: 1

      250,000 USD - value of a beautiful house
      010,000 USD - value of the land
      260,000 USD - sum, total value

      000,000 USD - value of a house ruined by rabbits (how? I don't know)
      010,000 USD - value of the land, same as before
      -32,000 USD - cost to demolish house ruined by rabbits
      -22,000 USD - new sum, total value

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:Darwin in action by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      No need to be jealous of those who find good deals before you do.
      In that case, you might be interested in the offer igny (716218) made above...
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    7. Re:Darwin in action by lost_it · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's not being a leech to buy something that you think is undervalued by the seller. Quite the opposite. It has the effect of smoothing out pricing in a market and making it more liquid.

      Whatever you need to tell yourself to make it easier to sleep at night... I'm about to move and was considering moving to a nearby larger city (where a lot of my friends moved a few years ago), until I saw the housing prices. The prices have doubled in the past three years. I know that housing prices go up in fits and spurts, but there is no way those houses are really worth what they're listing for. But people buy them anyway--and I can see you saying it now, "But if the houses are being purchased at that price, then they were worth that price, by definition." Which is where I point out that most people expect a house to appreciate in value, but those houses will probably drop in value or at least not increase for the next several years.

      Here's what happened in this market: the housing price started to go up a little faster than average (because people started realizing that this was a nice place to live). Then the flippers said, "Hey, prices are going up. I can buy a house now, sit on it for a few months, and then sell it at an even higher price." People that had to move into the area (or people that had to move into a larger house), paid through the nose and hoped for the best. But there are only so many people like that (and everyone else is avoiding buying real estate in that area). In fact, recently I've seen new listings go up for considerably lower prices than before. So it looks like the bubble is starting to burst, and these flippers will get stuck with selling houses at a loss.

      To summarize, all flippers do is temporarily raise housing prices to whatever the flippers think is the "true value" before the market corrects itself.

    8. Re:Darwin in action by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      I don't know where this example is, but anywhere near a major conurbation land is expensive. I find it hard to believe that a buch of wee bumnny-rabbits could do that much damage. Two questions: 1) how much is a shotgun or a dog? and 2) pie or casserole? Mmmmmmmm.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    9. Re:Darwin in action by acvh · · Score: 1

      "it's not being a leech to buy something that you think is undervalued by the seller"

      that's not what goes on here. this is one more chump taken in by the "make your fortune in real estate" infomercials. his only problem was he bought TOO cheap, and couldn't get the appraisal he needed to mortgage the property, take out a bunch of cash, and resell it to the next chump.

    10. Re:Darwin in action by moonbender · · Score: 1
      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    11. Re:Darwin in action by kesuki · · Score: 1

      But he missed a couple important variables.

      -75,000 (cost of building new, $250,000 home)
      +250,000 (value of new 250,000 home)
      he should have properly assessed the value at

      $142,000 (he could have halved that, because not everyone has a fleet of low price contrectors ready to put in a $300,000 home for the lowest possible cost in materials and labor)

      Because after cost of demolition and rebuilding the home, that's what it was worth to pay for the thing.

      Remember a $300 home costs a lot less to build, most of the value is in LOCATION. a simple home in materials and labor cost $25-30k and a more extravagantly outfitted house costs more in the 50-100k range, and then you get into the truly extravagant estates that cost millions to actually build, and even more to actually buy ;) but again, bare lots might be only worth $10 grand in that area, but how many bare lots are Actually FOR sale in afore mentioned area? most likely Zero. still, contractors like the one i mentioned are looking to maximize profit. why whould they pay good money to demo and rebuild at a site when they can hook up with banks full of forclosure properties that might be willing to negotiate terms more in their price range?

      property values generally have to be on the rise in an area for contractors to be looking out for 'cheap' properties they can demolish and put in 'new' houses though. afterall, why make 20k of profit when one can make 200k of profit?

    12. Re:Darwin in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Buy blighted house for $3000
      2. Buy more blighted houses for $3000
      3. Get city to use emminent domain to claim the rest of the blighted houses
      4. Build new shopping mall/high-rent office space
      5. Profit!

      It's happened before.

    13. Re:Darwin in action by djdavetrouble · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe if they had looked on google earth, they would have seen the liquor store on the corner, the holes in the roof, and the thugs standing on the corner slangin. I daresay that these people's mistake was not that they used the internet to buy property, but that they didn't use the internet enough. Look up median income, crime statistics, etc. etc. Then go look at it. I mean
      even when you buy a used car, you want to take it for a drive first.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    14. Re:Darwin in action by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      But people buy them anyway--and I can see you saying it now, "But if the houses are being purchased at that price, then they were worth that price, by definition."

      I'll say it, then: "If the houses are being purchased at that price, then they were worth that price, by definition." I can't think of a better way to measure what something is worth than by what price someone is willing to pay for it. Can you?

      That being said, I agree that the way housing prices are spiraling upwards is insane. Others in the thread have argued that there is no "bubble", but when prices are increasing faster than salaries, there is a point where the market just cannot be sustainable.

      In my county, average salaries have increased maybe 25% (that's being generous) in the last 10 years, but all of the homes I see for sale each week in the newspaper are 100-150% more than comparable homes 10 years ago. This is not sustainable, there has to be a point where people just cannot afford to buy a home and values will have to fall. Sadly, there are so many people around here building and buying these homes, only to have to sell them within a year to get out from under the mortgage or face forclosure. Maybe that's why my state is #1 in personal bankruptcy.

    15. Re:Darwin in action by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      uh, but most of these house flippers are nothing but speculative leeches. They really are.

    16. Re:Darwin in action by bigberk · · Score: 1

      > If you drop $100K on something sight unseen, you deserve whatever you get.

      During the tech stock bubble people were easily putting down $100k ($50k on margin) to buy hot stocks.

    17. Re:Darwin in action by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      Try the math again. If the house was habitable it would be worth $260,000. But it's not, it's soaked through and through with rabbit piss and poop.

      The only thing of value is the land, a small parcel worth around $10,000.

      The demolition company estimated $32,000 to tear down the place and cart the pieces to a sanitary landfill.

      So after you tear down the house, you're out $32,000 and you have left a lot worth $10,000. By my accounting, even if you sell the lot, you're still $22,000 in the hole.

    18. Re:Darwin in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, house prices are not indexed to salaries. Supply and demand sets prices. A small increase in average salary may lead to hugely increased demand and therefore hugely increased prices. Sure there is a point where it stops being sustainable, but 150% increase isn't necessarily that point.

    19. Re:Darwin in action by afidel · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where the heck you live, but the cost to build even a modest house is WAY more than you state. I was looking to buy a 1-2 acre lot in a semi-rural area around Cleveland and the cost to build a decent (not great) 1,200 square foot ranch was around $42-45,000 depending on the builder and materials chosen. Building a $300K home would probably cost over $150K, but if you can get the land that cheap then it probably still makes sense.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    20. Re:Darwin in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is this thing called a 'profit' margin. if you own the contracting companies, then the 'real cost' is far less than the price someone hiring said contractors to build the same thing is.

      you also fail to realize that modest houses are priced relatively close to costs (narrow margin) and higher priced homes tend to be prices with Larger margins. kind of like having a sliding scale fee. make more money off the 'rich' kinda philosophy.

      also a 40k home in rural cleveland would cost over 200k for the Exact same house, in a much higher value area. the original pposter didn't emntion where the house was located, so i had no way to know other than the $10,000 lot valuation, which doesn't say much. there are places where lots cost $10,000 but homes cost $400,000 in the area i live in.. sometimes the lack of available lots makes the 'lot' valuation artificially low, because there simply are no lots for sale with which to compare.

      Also consider that a "Do it yourselfer" can completely rip out the interiour of a house (floorings, walls if needed) and rebuild the interoir of the house without needing a huge contracting crew... yes, it might be tempting to demolish a house long infested by rabbits, but simply ripping up the floors, cleaning all the walls and ceilings, completely repainting, relaying new carpet/pergo tiling etc... might cost a DIY a lot less (perhaps a few grand and a couple months of labor) depending on the quality of replacement floorings used etc... so really, from that perspective such an 'animal house' would still warrent at least on third to half it's original value (since obviously the purchaser would need to make the profit back as compensation for all the man hours spent stripping and remodling the project)

      my point was simply that the only time a land can obtain a 'negative' asset worth is when there are Costly EPA regulated cleanups required to develop the land further. and sometimes even cleanup sites are 'desiareable' because of the possibily of using the 'good press' of cleaning up some 'site' to put something new there (perhaps a commercial or industrial complex etc) that's really a very situational call though.

  7. Do your DD by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These speculators are no different than penny stock "investors" ... who could possibly feel sorry for them.

  8. First... by hoodofblack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah that would not be so good to have a house on a busy street next to a crack house...or a brothel...or a bar...or anything else other than a house.

    1. Re:First... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > not be so good to have a house on a busy street next to a crack house...
      their are alott of people who wouldn't mind being walking distance to any of these.
      personally I would get much more enjoyment being a block from a bar/strip joint than a church, boutique, etc (oh wait, with the exception of my current house I have never lived more than 3 blocks from a bar.)

    2. Re:First... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...with the exception of my current house I have never lived more than 3 blocks from a bar."

      Yeah...I like to live within 'stumbling' distance to home...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  9. Simple solution by spellraiser · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Don't buy real estate you haven't seen.

    Right?

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Simple solution by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Which is why I always buy property on the Moon on the side facing the Earth, never on the farside!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. Sight unseen by Southpaw018 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buying items from a reputable, well-tested online company like (for example) Newegg or Amazon is one thing.
    Buying collectibles off eBay is one thing.

    Buying a big ticket luxury item - ANY such item - cars, real estate, houses, deeds...that's misguided at best unless you live in proximity to the seller and can see it (inspect it) yourself presale. We have a term for people who will buy things like this with full and total trust in the seller. It's called "sucker."
    Or, if you're a proponent of our legal system, "plaintiff."

    --
    ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    1. Re:Sight unseen by lheal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Particularly if the seller calls you up and says:

      "Hi there, Bob. Can I call you "Bob"? I know we've agreed on $15,000 for the boat, but all of a sudden I've ... I've had some personal ... I don't want to burden you with the details. My daughter is ... anyway, I'm in a fix. I need to either call off the deal, or ... tell you what: could you give me just $12,000 for the boat, but send it to me directly, not through E-Bay?"

      "We'll just tell 'em we cancelled the deal ..."

      You and your $12,000 will be soon parted.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  11. If you do this, you're asking for trouble... by babbling · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Buying any real estate online is clearly a stupid thing to do. Anyone who does this was just going to lose their money via some other scam, anyway. There's not much point in trying to prevent them from losing their money, because they will eventually find a way.

    A fool and his/her money will soon be parted.

    1. Re:If you do this, you're asking for trouble... by Manuka · · Score: 1

      A fool and his money are soon parted...

      as well they should be, fools shouldn't be allowed to keep it.

  12. well thats just stupid by nickgrieve · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Buying a house site unseen is just plain stupid, fools and their money indeed.

    1. Re:well thats just stupid by paiute · · Score: 1

      Buying a house site unseen

      Accidentally perfect statement.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  13. Too good to be true by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If something sounds too good to be true, it most likely is. Why do people stop thinking when greed becomes a factor?

    Someone sells you something for FAR less than what it should be worth, provided they're not lying. Bonus question for $1000: Why should they? Would you sell your house without at least getting a rough quote from some online service how much your hut is worth? Hey, we're talking a few 1000 bucks at the very least here, it's not like I'm selling some old junk that might be someone's treasure, a house is a house, and by its very nature, it has value! And everyone, literally everyone, knows that.

    So why should you think someone does NOT know that a house is worth more than a few 1000 bucks, especially when it's somewhere in downtown?

    Just like with used cars. When the year old car that's been driven only by a cute old granny, always just to church and back goes for less than 1000 bucks, would you buy it?

    I wouldn't even buy the story, and certainly not the car!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Too good to be true by houghi · · Score: 1

      If something sounds too good to be true, it most likely is.

      Most likely. Not always! My OS is cheaper (free) then the one most people use.

      I ionce was offerd to buy a car for about 10% of the real vallue. Unfortunatly I did not have the money, otherwise I would have made a great deal. Yet it was legid.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Too good to be true by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Just like with used cars. When the year old car that's been driven only by a cute old granny, always just to church and back goes for less than 1000 bucks, would you buy it?

      I would after I (or had somebody else) inspected it. If I look at it, the outside, the interior, the engine, the mounts, the transmission, hoses, belts, suspension, tires, wheels, etc - if it looks good, then I turn the vehicle on, with the hood open, and listen/look at the engine (no wierd noises, abnormal smells or smoke, open the oil cap once at operating temp to see if there is any smoke/blowby, etc), then drive it around (handles well, runs well, brakes well, no abnormal noises, etc) - if all of that checks out, then yeah - I would buy it.

      The thing is, most people don't know how or why to do these things (hell, most people don't even know how to change their oil), and they get scammed on obviously bad car deals every day, that anyone with a modicum of sense (and a little grease under their nails - why don't people understand and work on their cars?) would be able to see was a real lemon.

      As far as other products - I have gotten great deals from sellers on EBay for items you can't find any where else. Now, whether the products are actually worth what I paid for them, I don't really know - most of the time I think I got a great deal. For instance, I enjoy buying older (mid-1990's) "professional" VR HMDs. I once picked up a General Reality Cyber-Eye CE-200M HMD from a seller for around $300.00 (and it included a 3DOF sourceless magnetic tracker the seller didn't realize was a separate part - that was an $800.00 unit by itself). A couple of years later I picked up a well used Virtuality Visette 2 HMD (originally part of an arcade pod) for around $200.00 (that one may or may not work - I have yet to get it powered up because of the non-standard connector and the need for PAL composite video). Recently (last year), I picked up (from a local junkyard) an Altair 8080 for $100.00 (it was the lowest he would go - oh, damn). It needs some cleaning and TLC - but I know it is worth way more than I paid.

      All of this comes back to knowing what it is you are buying. When it comes to buying used items where the item can be viewed, that is one thing. But where you can't view it, you have to use all the tools at your disposal. For my EBay purchases, that means looking at the history of the seller, and what people have to say about him, and what the item is. Since I tend to buy obscure stuff off of sellers on EBay, I carefully look at any pictures of the item in question. For VR gear, you can tell if it is a "scam" (ie, using obvious product photos instead of real ones of the item in question), or if they are really trying to offload a real item from another era. Most of the time, you can tell when someone is selling used stuff they don't want/need anymore, vs a possible scam, by taking in all the information together, getting a "gut feeling", and going with that.

      Now - if only someone would sell for a very low price a multi-sensor Polhemus magnetic tracker system...sigh.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  14. Barnum was right by ROOK*CA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    from the article:

    "Mr. Hoyt said he had repeatedly appealed to eBay officials, asking the company to make specific changes, like informing sellers that they must comply with New York State disclosure laws and requiring a copy of written sales contracts. But Mr. Hoyt said he had received little cooperation from the company.

    "What eBay is doing, in my opinion, is immoral," he said. "They have a responsibility to not facilitate activity like this."


    Wait a minute, eBay has a seller rating system, eBay has an escrow service, so who in there right mind buys a HOUSE sight unseen, from an unrated or negatively rated seller, without using escrow? I think this is a problem with some people, they make stupid buying decisions and then turn around and want the listing agent (or the government) to take some sort of responsibility for it.

    I'm not trying to relieve any of the responsibility for this off unscrupulous sellers (it is in fact immoral to intentionally rip off buyers), however at some point buyers need to have enough common sense to do at least a modicum of due diligence don't you think? Apparently people think that caveat emptor doesn't apply on the Internet, when in fact it's probably the most important consumer protection mechanism, especially when most of the tools you need to do your due diligence are at your fingertips (MLS services, city records, etc..,)

    Also from the article, this one IMO is a true "gem"

    "Mr. Krug said Mr. Tanner had asked him the same question. "I told him the first thing he did wrong was buy a computer," Mr. Krug said."

    Amen Mr. Krug, Amen.

    1. Re:Barnum was right by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "(it is in fact immoral to intentionally rip off buyers)"

      Morality is subjective; the morality of an action cannot be immoral in fact, but only in someone's opinion.

      It may be a fact that you think it is immoral -- but plenty of people have no moral qualms about getting the best price possible. People always try to show properties in the best light when they are selling; is that immoral?

      That said, I agree with you in general -- caveat emptor still applies, and unless the seller made false claims about the property, the buyer needs to chalk this up as a learning experience.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Barnum was right by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      I disagree regarding the computer aspect here. Mr. Krug was taken because he has been absurdly careless with his money. He could have just as easily lost it by buying a ruin which was advertised e.g. in the New York Times. Of course then Mr. Krug and Ms. Fennelly might complain that they'd seen the ad in a reputable paper.

    3. Re:Barnum was right by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      from an unrated or negatively rated seller

      Even if it was from a positive rated seller. If he sold some very small items it would have been easy to get a good rating. Then make a big rip of on a big item and just loose 1 rating.

      And then there are also hijacked accounts.

      By the way, anyone here interested in buying a place that contains toxic waste?

    4. Re:Barnum was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barnum was right, but he didn't say what you think he said.

    5. Re:Barnum was right by ROOK*CA · · Score: 1

      Even if it was from a positive rated seller. If he sold some very small items it would have been easy to get a good rating

      Which I think is one reason why eBay puts a link to the item sold for each buyer comment (as well as the rating of the commentor), if you don't look at the details of the seller ratings they really don't do you much good. However you're right, they could also be using a hiijacked accounts. The seller rating system on eBay isn't of course foolproof, but I have found it's usually a good starting point and indicator as to whether it's worthwhile to give an item a further look or just pass it right on by.

    6. Re:Barnum was right by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      How the hell would escrow help? It's not like you can 'not ship' real estate.

      Or does eBay let you say 'I'm not happy with what I purchased' and not pay the seller? If so, remind me never to use escrow.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    7. Re:Barnum was right by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      You know what ebay also does? They take old items out of their database in a fairly short amount of time.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    8. Re:Barnum was right by gronofer · · Score: 1
      I told him the first thing he did wrong was buy a computer

      That's the mistake we all made. It's not fair to laugh at Mr. Tanner.

  15. JRGhaddar by JRGhaddar · · Score: 5, Funny

    They don't tell you you're going to be across the street from a crack house. Yeah but if you get 3 more crack houses you can then upgrade to a bordello, and that's where the money is...

    1. Re:JRGhaddar by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Cool, another Grand Theft: Monopoly fan!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  16. It's the same for most major purchases by matr0x_x · · Score: 1

    Honestly, the same issues this article is shedding light on apply to any major purchase you make online. A lot of cars being sold online have small defects in them, they state the cars year and mileage, but fail to mention that it was abused for several years and doesn't quite shift properly, etc. Caveat Emptor applies to every major situation - and it's harder to be fully aware of what you're purchasing when you're riding 100% on how someone else describes it.

    --
    LINUX ONLINE POKER: Linux Poker
    1. Re:It's the same for most major purchases by gronofer · · Score: 1
      Caveat Emptor applies to every major situation

      It applies to the minor situations too. You won't lose at much all in one go, but it will add up over time. Lottery tickets and cigarettes are good examples.

  17. Re:Buffalo, NY - white people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    white people.

    Buffalo has a white-flight death spiral worse than Gary, Indiana.

  18. Reasearch! by Drakin · · Score: 1

    Why do people seem to think that buying on the net is that much easier?

    No matter how you're buying something, you need to do some research into what exaclly you're buying.

    1. Re:Reasearch! by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Oh, but it IS easier!
      Russian Roulette is easier than Bingo too.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  19. Online real estate? by Marimus · · Score: 1

    I thought they were talking about Second Life or some MMORPG.

    Right up until I read the article anyway.

    --
    Umm, can I submit a response later?
    1. Re:Online real estate? by gronofer · · Score: 1

      After reading the article, I'm too scared to by real estate in Second Life or some MMORPG online.

  20. Sight unseen? by erick99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I worry about buying a $20 item on eBay based on a description and a photo......

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  21. Common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it about those twits that common sense is increasingly identified as "news"?

  22. Hmm by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    I always thought the rules for buying online is "Never spend more than you are willing to lose" unless you would trust the website with your life.

    Hell these guys got a house, they could of just got a garden shed put on illegal land or fake deeds. May not be the super nice advertised place hey said, but they could at least give it to a charity working with these type of people (read : homeless, prostitutes, etc.) and let them turn it into a safe house of sorts to supply food to people if nothing else.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Hmm by ROOK*CA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May not be the super nice advertised place hey said, but they could at least give it to a charity working with these type of people (read : homeless, prostitutes, etc.) and let them turn it into a safe house of sorts to supply food to people if nothing else.

      Unless of course the cost of getting the building up to code or tearing it down is greater than the value of the place, in which case a charity isn't going to take it, since they would in effect be paying you to take the property off your hands. I'd imagine that's the goal of some of these Real Estate "flippers", sell it for way less than the value of the land and pass along the incumberances of the house to somebody else, in essence they are making the seller pay for the priviledge of paying the liabilities on the property. Which ends up being a ponzi scheme, everybody in the chain makes money except the last guy (who can't even then give the property away).

  23. re: paypal activity by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    De4r Customorbe:

    Your Payp01 account has been hadding suspcicious "stuff" go on, please to make your correction!

    Update your info

    ---------------- skip ahead to site

    Please enter your credit card number, security number, expiry, date of birth, mothers maiden name, social security, ATM pin and your home address for our databases! ....

    Suprisingly those still catch people.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  24. Some obvious solutions by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    Well, the buyer can just turn around and resell it on eBay -- hopefully recouping their loss. One idiot can sell to another, right?

    But I'm concerned by this sentence: "The practice, local government leaders say, is destabilizing already weakened urban neighborhoods by displacing legitimate investment." That is a real problem. Perhaps it should be illegal to purchase a house unless you sign something stating that you (or your legal representative) has seen the place in person. I mean, you cannot legislate intelligence, but you might be able to erect a few barriers to stupidity.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Some obvious solutions by ROOK*CA · · Score: 1

      Well, the buyer can just turn around and resell it on eBay -- hopefully recouping their loss. One idiot can sell to another, right?

      Sure, if the idiot doing the selling is an idiot with no integrity.

      But I'm concerned by this sentence: "The practice, local government leaders say, is destabilizing already weakened urban neighborhoods by displacing legitimate investment." That is a real problem. Perhaps it should be illegal to purchase a house unless you sign something stating that you (or your legal representative) has seen the place in person. I mean, you cannot legislate intelligence, but you might be able to erect a few barriers to stupidity.

      I see your point, however I suspect the comment regarding market destabilization is specifically designed to drive legislation, how can a market where there is apparently no practical way to sell under legitimate circumstances be "destabilized" any further? Personally I don't think the public should pay to protect adults from their own blatant stupidity and laziness (via additional legislation).

    2. Re:Some obvious solutions by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Oh, but why? Responsible buyers buy from responsible sellers in a responsible manner, and can recognize a scam long before they get involved. This sector of market is stable. Idiots buy from scammers. This sector of market is unstable, but who gives a shit?

      I'm not sure about the origins of the following quote, but I certainly love it:
      "I'm not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why won't we remove all the warning labels and let the problem solve itself?"

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Some obvious solutions by sethg · · Score: 1

      The easier it is to make money as a real-estate con artist, the harder it is to make money as a legitimate salesman. (For example, it becomes harder for the legitimate people to build trust with their customers, because the crooks damage the reputation of the whole market.) This reduces the liquidity of the market, which is a nuisance for anyone trying to buy or sell property.

      I don't have much sympathy for the people who bought these slums sight-unseen, but like drunk drivers, their stupidity harms people other than themselves.

      --
      send all spam to theotherwhitemeat@ropine.com
    4. Re:Some obvious solutions by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      This would be the case if con artists were really con -artists-, and poor unsuspecting victims were normal unsuspecting victims. But here the gap between honest sellers and the scammers is too wide. These are two different worlds. If there was a problem telling one kind apart from the other, sure the cheaters would hurt the trade. But if you're going to buy a house, you ask the sacramental "can I see it first?" and the seller's reaction is the most obvious identification with 0% chance of failure. If you fail to ask this question, you're the one to blame. You took a big gulp from unidentified bottle, while driving, without even trying to smell if it's alcohol (or poison) first.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    5. Re:Some obvious solutions by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      You could even frame it in such a way it would be hard to object.

      How about requiring all real estate transactions to happen on said real estate? This not only demonstates that the buyer knows exactly what property he's buying, but helps show that the seller has the legal right to sell the property. (Hopefully, if he didn't, someone would show up and ask what the hell is going on.)

      This would also stop whiney fools who view the 'model home' in a subdivision, and then buy a property, sight unseen, for a house to be built on, and then complain that they're backed up against a shopping mall or highway or something.

      As an added bonus, it would automatically stop those idiots selling property rights on the moon.

      If having the actual transaction happen on the property is unfeasable, you could be allowed to head there in advance and sign a statement saying you are currently on the property, but intend to do the transaction elsewhere. As long as both the buyer and seller, or an agent of the buyer and seller, sign something while standing together on the property.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  25. Why didn't I think of that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There I am trying to flog rubbish on ebay for $20 -- $100, in the hope that some people don't check well enough for crooks like me before bying something cheapish.

    And these people actually sell $200,000 houses on ebay! Brilliant! Why didn't I think of that before!

  26. Re:The only factor that counts - CAUCASIAN percent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    By CAUCASIAN, I assume you mean the typical neo-Nazi WASP credential -- in which case I would argue that you are wrong. I worked for a city development office that put out about a 100+ 8-1/2x11 book on neighborhood crime statistics. When we moved to Baltimore, one of the first things I did was go to the city hall and ask for a similar set of stats on their neighborhoods. They looked at me like I was a martian, or at least a leftist agitator, so, in a moment of inspiration, I asked where the Jewish neighborhoods were. THAT they knew. Haven't regretted it. And in the subsequent move to our current city we did the same thing. It's great. We can watch the crime on TV from both the inner city _and_ the exurban white welfare meth lab trailer parks and apartment complex suburbs. In contrast, our very much inside-the-beltway, but not "inner" city, neighborhood public school has the highest test scores in the state.

    So do Jews count as CAUCASIAN in your equation, Dudster?

  27. Dear Slashdotter, by archeopterix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am contacting you with this fabulous business offer. I am selling a property at a bargain price of $50000!. I have prepared some pictures here.

    1. Re:Dear Slashdotter, by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Thats nice, but I'd be more interested in the Brooklyn Bridge. Isn't that the one that is usually for sale?

    2. Re:Dear Slashdotter, by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      I'd be more interested in the Brooklyn Bridge. Isn't that the one that is usually for sale?
      There's no fooling you, Sir, that I can see. Now you, sir, being far from a fool will undertstand why that one isn't for sale any more - [sigh] somebody already bought it. We got another one, but I know, you wanted that one. Ain't it always the way?

      But listen up - I like your face. You look a bit Italian, like my momma was. Welsh you say - hey, just like my uncle, er, Ddaffydd. It's like this - the other guy bid 50,000 for it and signed the papers all legal and everything, but he hasn't paid the deposit yet. If that's the bridge you want, and you can come up with the cash today, it's yours.

      Minor problem, the widow I'm selling it for really needs the money, and I'd have to reimburse the other guy for his out of pocket expenses. A deal's a deal, even with a schmuck like him - the old lady wanted 65 thou and he haggled & haggled & beat her down, she needs the money for an operation. I think he knew. Bastard. Listen, to get rid if him and get his bloodsucking lawyers off my back shouldn't come to two, er, three, er ... look, let's say 55k in green ones, today, and it's yours. Old lady's got a better deal, you got a better deal and the schmuck's got nothing. Whatchasay? We got a deal?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  28. .. I got scammed like this by neveragain4181 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, got hit by the unexpected shipping charges...

  29. 4 rules to cover your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Use a big escrow company and do a 30 day escrow, including a phrase that says you have 1 week to inspect the property.
    2. Hire a good inspection company to inspect the place.
    3. Go there yourself, you won't waste a trip because at least you know you are going to buy the place (rather than just win the auction).
    4. Title insurance is cheap.

    It's really not that hard to cover your ass on this.

  30. I always wondered. by Joebert · · Score: 1

    I always wondered where people that won the powerball spent the money.
    I'm sorry, but anyone buying a HOUSE on the internet obviously isn't spending money they worked very hard for...

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  31. Trusted Realtors by tekcsound · · Score: 1

    I repeat the previous sentiments: buying property on eBay w/o escrow, what are they thinking?

    I do web work for a realtor who sometimes sells commercial properties (apartments etc.) to clients who've never seen what they're buying in person. Then again, he's with one of the larger agencies and does the actual purchase through traditional channels.

    Plus, with the virtual walkthroughs I'm doing, the client has a pretty good idea of what they're buying beforehand. So yes, buying properties "online" is possible, but the client needs to use their brains a bit when choosing who they work with.

    1. Re:Trusted Realtors by Geminii · · Score: 1

      L@@k fixer-upper mud hut at the bottom of the river CHEAP! Check it out! set src=taj_mahal.walkthough

  32. But the price was _so_ good by smchris · · Score: 1

    Just for the concept, I still regret not being able to say I got a new car for $3999.99 in 1989 when a local dealership was dumping Yugos. Same thing for some of the stuff on ebay. How could a piece of that resort timeshare outside Kwa Zulu Natal not be worth $1500?

    Well, let us count the ways, right?

  33. Google Earth might help by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to get a good overview of what you are buying, try typing the address in Google Earth and then see what lies around it.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Google Earth might help by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah google earth saved me a ton of money when I looked up a house I was considering purchasing because if it weren't for google earth I wouldn't have seen the termites.

  34. Google Maps and Earth by AnonymousPrick · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I see a lot of posts saying, "Don't buy sight unseen!"

    But, no one has suggested using Google maps/earth. That's what I would do even if I were buying locally.

    I was once on a trainging flight and as I passed over this really expensive neighborhood, I saw a quarry not more than a few hundred yards away, tucked in a very heavily forested area. I'm sure after they spent mega$$ on their McMansions, they were probably surprised by the blasting and all of the trucks going by.

    Now, I'd make sure there wasn't any surprises like that if I were buying a home.

    --
    Saturday is April 1. Slashdot will be shut down. Sorry for the inconvenience.
    1. Re:Google Maps and Earth by castoridae · · Score: 1

      A lot of developers make it regular practice to use helicopter fly-bys to check out parcels of land they are interested in purchasing/developing - or to find new areas in which they may want to purchase/build.

    2. Re:Google Maps and Earth by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Interesting suggestion.. but it's important to note that those aerial photos can be several years old and may not reflect reality anymore.

    3. Re:Google Maps and Earth by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      Actually, the poster directly above you suggested using Google Earth :)

  35. Could have been worse... by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it had been contaminated with toxic waste (e.g. from a meth lab), he could have ended up owing thousands or millions to the government for clean up costs.

  36. I don't want to feed the trolls but by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else notice that those with extreme reacist views never have the moral courage to put their names to them.

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    1. Re:I don't want to feed the trolls but by ami-in-hamburg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe it's because racism, bigotry, etc.. etc.. are generally fuled by fear. Therefore, cowards are the ones making the comments.

    2. Re:I don't want to feed the trolls but by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else notice that those with extreme reacist views never have the moral courage to put their names to them.

      Of course not. They're afraid of the majority.
      Now, that's irony for you.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  37. Not all online real estate deals are dangerous by ami-in-hamburg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some online real estate deals are, for the most part, safe.

    For example, wilderness purchases if you should have the inclination to build a getaway cabin. Granted, there are no structures most of the time, it's just the land.

    Another example would be buying fringe properties. If you believe that a company or a city will eventually want to expand into a particular area, you might want to buy the land if you have the chance to get in early enough. You would have to look out for potential immenent domain problems though. A friend of mine inherited basically a huge field when his parents died in a small town in central Arizona. About 3 years ago, some company wanted to build a retirement village with a golf course. They paid him 7 Million for a stupid field. Sweet!

    Other potential online purchases would be castles. Yes, that's right, castles. There are dozens and dozens of mansions and castles that sit in what was formerly East Germany. The original owners have simply abandoned them and the local authorities auction off the properties. Many times they go relatively cheap, like a couple thousand dollars cheap, if you don't mind the renovation costs. They can make great vacation spots or quiet retirement villas.

    1. Re:Not all online real estate deals are dangerous by drwho · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's true, there are some cheap real estate ventures that are less risky than others. For instance, if you buy timber property cheap enough, you can make some good money based on statistics.

      As far as eastern germany - yes, I have been looking there. Some wonderful old buildings, some very 'renovierungsbedurftig' (needing renovation). My worry would be that many of them are 'Denkmalschutz', ie. preserved under law from some type of demolition. I'd worry too much about exactly how close to the original it has to be preserved -- with coal heat? One toilet for four apartments? Or just basically that you can't tear it down and build a wal-mart?

      I also investigated property auctions in germany. Alas, you have to be a german resident or german corporation to buy.

    2. Re:Not all online real estate deals are dangerous by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      if you don't mind the renovation costs

      The 'renovation costs' would be things like: climate control, electricity, water, doors, windows, and walls.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  38. And still going.... by flipper65 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just out of curiosity, I cruised over to ebay and searched for real estate in Buffalo. Surprise, surprise, a 'Mr. Burt' is listing a fixer upper for a very low price. Coincidence? I don't think so. I was going to insert something here about not buying sight unseen, but then I sat back and thought about it and realized that I might very well have done the same thing. Dropping 3K to own a bit of real estate doesn't seem like a bad flyer. How bad could you get hurt? This was actually a wake up call for me.

  39. Loads freaky ebay stuff that's too good to be true by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Check this "dragon chopper" motorcycle. I'm sure that there'll be a number of buyers for these that will end up disappointed when it comes time to actually register and plate them. (For one thing: no place to hang the plate!) Little details like no break or turn lights, an EPA certification that's probably virtual, might make it hard to get on the road. Which is good .. because if you do get it up to the claimed 128 MPH (from a 200cc aircooled 1 cyl engine, narf!), slowing with the cable front breaks could be problematical even if the frame holds up. From a seller that got a shipping container from China, and once they're sold, he's gone. All these warning signs, and people still buy them online, sight unseen.

    Still .. beautiful plumage!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  40. Greed overcomes Reason by hattig · · Score: 1

    Idiots. Fancy not even researching the area where a house is!

    I don't feel very sorry for these people. They should have known better.

    OTOH the people 'flipping' these houses aren't exactly nice people either, and seem little better than scammers. Clearly sales of houses online should be subject to the same laws as selling them elsewhere - i.e,. the description has to be accurate, as the article says.

    He should be thankful he is only $30,000 down on the situation. A lot, but not life-changing. If you can't afford the risk, then don't take it.

  41. Is the entire world becoming a shut-in? by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Based on the boom in online shopping, and the boom in American's fat asses, I'd have to say resoundingly, YES.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  42. Would they write a story about positive experience by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    The New York Times investigates negative experiences of people buying investment real estate online.

    So people bought real estate without ever seeing it and some of them did not get what they thought they were buying? Gee, who would have thought that would happen? Probably the same people that are working with a Nigerian representative to get money out of that country. What better place to park a lot of money they will be getting soon, property purchased via the Internet.

    Such people should have their computers confiscated and be barred from using electronic devices. These are the same people that jam forks into toasters and plug to many things into a single outlet.

  43. Barnum would like you by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute, eBay has a seller rating system, eBay has an escrow service, so who in there right mind buys a HOUSE sight unseen, from an unrated or negatively rated seller, without using escrow?

    The fact that you qualified this post with "if you had used eBay's escrow services, or bought from a highly rated seller" proves that you're one of those suckers Barnum was supposedly talking about. Trusting eBay for any kind of purchase is just stupid. I haven't known anybody who HAS NOT gotten scammed from eBay at least once.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Barnum would like you by ROOK*CA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I haven't known anybody who HAS NOT gotten scammed from eBay at least once.

      Well I haven't (ever been scammed on eBay) and I've bought literally thousands of items so I'm not "one of those suckers" but apparently everybody you know IS to some degree. My comment regarding escrow and seller ratings were not intended to be all inclusive, in other words based on the article it does not appear that these buyers even went that far. eBay attempts to provide the minimal protections that can be implemented without interfering with the free market nature of their service and I for one think they do a decent job given the intent & limitations. This would be why I specifically pointed out Caveat Emptor and that many of the tools for DUE DILLIGENCE (such as MLS, City Records, etc.,) were at your fingertips, but apparently you didn't read that far.

    2. Re:Barnum would like you by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I was scammed, but it was more from seller ignorance than from anything else.

      A seller claimed to have a Magnavox Odyssey game console for sale. This early console is actually a pretty good collector's item and they go for a decent amount. I had the top bid, got shipped the item... and it was an Odyssey 2! (Which isn't nearly the same thing.)

      It wasn't a *huge* deal, since I wanted an Odyssey 2 in my collection also. I emailed the seller and told her to be a lot more careful when listing items... I *could* have reported that as a fraud and gotten her eBay account cancelled.

      I've also been burned from a newsgroup ages ago, when I was looking for a eternal SCSI CD-R (recorder) and some guy tried to sell me a regular CD drive that wasn't a recorder. Again, this was only seller ignorance, and since it was arranged with a face-to-face meeting I could inspect the goods and refuse the sale.

  44. Gotta love the internet by taff^2 · · Score: 0
    There's an old saying that goes

    "A fool and his money are easily parted."

    Now, thanks to the internet, it's even easier! Caveat Emptor!
    --
    Karma: Bad. (As in Good?)
  45. Re:Loads freaky ebay stuff that's too good to be t by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    I swear the break / brake typos were not deliberate on a conscious level. Not enough coffee for conscious levels yet.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  46. Various Aphorisms Apply by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Caveat Emptor
    A Fool and His Money are Soon Parted
    Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public
    SEC v. Zandford (01-147)

  47. Eh? by ErikZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The guy spent 10k. On THREE houses.

    A deal like that, one would expect them to be on the edge of an active volcano.

    At this point, you level those houses and rebuild on the property. 3k doesn't get you a house, it gets you land with house shaped debris on it.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  48. Look again by QMO · · Score: 1

    "When did you ever go somewhere beautiful and see photos of cities with the slogan "get away from it all - go to London", for instance?"

    I don't know about London, but New York city is marketed very effectively as a place to go to have fun. And, while I have no desire to live in Manhattan, the property values demonstrate that plenty of people like it permanently.

    Also, Las Vegas makes losts money telling people to go there to "get away."

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:Look again by Disavian · · Score: 1

      But legalized prostitution and gambling around that area couldn't have anything to do with that. No sir.

    2. Re:Look again by QMO · · Score: 1

      Why the non-sequitur?

      Even though true for Vegas, and not for NYC, it doesn't change the fact that people DO see those places as ways to go on vacation.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  49. Use that web thingy. by paiute · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, before you dropped a few thousand on a house you had never seen, wouldn't you at least

    look at it in Google Maps?
    search the local papers for stories mentioning the street, streets nearby, the neighborhood?
    call someone who lived near to it - maybe a business - and ask what they thought of the place?
    check any online information from the city/county/state - assessed values, etc?

    I know jack about real estate, and I would be doing those in the first ten minutes after the thought to invest came to me.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Use that web thingy. by Tsunayoshi · · Score: 1

      look at it in Google Maps?
      NO
      search the local papers for stories mentioning the street, streets nearby, the neighborhood?
      NO
      call someone who lived near to it - maybe a business - and ask what they thought of the place?
      NO
      check any online information from the city/county/state - assessed values, etc?
      NO

      Dude, if I took all of the time to do that, I would lose out on a kick-ass deal!!

      --
      "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." - Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
  50. News Flash! by doublem · · Score: 1

    People spending hundreds of thousands of dollars with sellers of unknown reliability on land and houses they've never seen sometimes get ripped off.

    Film at 11.

    If this were fark.com, I'd be adding a pic of a certain reporter with bad hair.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  51. People do this? by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 1

    I love shopping online for many items, mostly 'data' type stuff (software, books, CDs, DVDs, etc), but I'm surprised there are people who actually make serious real estate purchases online-only. I won't even buy a pair of jeans online... Some things you just need to see/try in person!

  52. Real Estate Tip by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 1

    Don't buy property you couldn't see yourself ever living in.

  53. I found a pleasant surprise.... by MonoSynth · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....for Dutch online real estate buyers :)

    go to www.funda.nl (the country's biggest real estate website) and search for 'konijn' (Dutch for 'rabbit') :)

  54. Information Traps by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Please enter your credit card number, security number, expiry, date of birth, mothers maiden name, social security, ATM pin and your home address for our databases! ....

    Suprisingly those still catch people.
    Personally, I've always thought that what has the greatest potential would be to operate an entirely legitimate site that offers a genuine service which requires a user name and password, and then go out and hit the major sites (banking, eBay, stock, etc) and see how many people registered with the same username and password there too. I'll admit to having done this in the past, right up until the day that a site I'd used went bankrupt and a week later, another site with a similar premise was up and emailed me that everything was set up for my profile with them including my old password. Now it's possible that this was a case of the old company renaming itself after bankruptcy and trying again, but I suspect it's just a matter of all of my login information being part of the company assets that were bought.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Information Traps by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Yet more reasons I wish websites would let me login with an X509 certificate; it means I'm not giving the site a reusable authentication token! Not to mention, when some idiot decides to store, let alone e-mail me, my credentials in clear text, it's not nearly as big an issue.

  55. I object by StupidStan · · Score: 0

    I bought my 88 honda prelude for $300 and it has gotten me 12,000 miles so far, and the only bad thing is the muffler fell off (yes, it just fell off) and it looks like hell.

  56. Dummy Mode trigger by QMO · · Score: 1

    The hope of getting something for nothing fuels a lot of industries. Gambling (including lotteries) seems most obvious.

    How many people have lost more than $2500 (net) in, say, two years of gambling?

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:Dummy Mode trigger by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The lottery - a tax on those who weren't so good at math. Works for me - less taxes for the rest of us - but highly immoral regardless.

    2. Re:Dummy Mode trigger by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you define gambling. It is possible to actually make money at some (poker) if you're skilled. And you have fun while playing. No, I haven't lost 2500 a year, but I lost about 500 over the past 2. If I had gone to the movies instead of playing poker it easily would have cost me 5K. If you're even avearge and play cheap tables, its good entertainment.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:Dummy Mode trigger by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "How many people have lost more than $2500 (net) in, say, two years of gambling?"

      Hahaha no.

      In 85 or so I went to Lost Wages; my wife at the time had been there for a week for a national bridge tournament. I'm an *not* a card player. Coerced by the crow to gamble, I followed them and played blackjack. In half an hour I'd converted $60 to $120 and quit. Stopped right there. I'd made enough for dinner. Everybody said I was nuts to end in the middle of "a roll". I took that to mean "why are you stopping while you still have monye left?". That's almost as dumb a question as "why did you split those queens" which seemed to make sense to me (Two chances to win!) but to them, or the pit boss who came over to watch me. Closely. I won one lost the other.

      I ate my free dinner that night, then next morning tried again. Lost $60 in about 5 minutes. I never gambled again.

      More on topic, some guy in a neighboring burg had been trying to sell his place for 180K and got no nibbles. Seeme the planned mega farm for uh, pigs, had put a damper on real estate sales. A friend of his "sold his place on the internet" for 180K US not CDN (at a time when that actuallymeant something) and this couple from Atlanta got their idyllic cottage on a lake, lot trees. And uh, the know nothing about no steenking pig farm.

      I believe the phrase theie grasping for is "due diligence"

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  57. Get a buyer's agent by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Informative
    I can sympathize with why people don't like dealing with agents. Many of them are just trying to sell you something, they don't return phone calls half the time and sometimes you're rightly suspicious they're not telling you the whole story. But working with the worst agent in the area is better than dealing directly with the seller online. There are a whole raft of safeguards you give up without agency representation.

    But at least working with an agent in most states you have specific legal protections that are lacking in online transactions. It's a lot easier to take action in most states against a crooked agent than a crooked seller. Most times they're mandated to have E&O, the real estate agent's professional liability insurance. State oversight boards are notoriously brutal and inflexible. Real estate agents had such a bad reputation that many states laid the hammer down. As a spurned buyer your chances of getting justice from the state real estate commission or the courts are extremely high if your agent might reasonably have known about a potential problem.

    The buyer's agent normally gets their cut from the seller. 90% of the time it doesn't cost you anything to have an agent if you're a buyer. In some areas buyer's agents charge up front fees, so ask first.

    Truthfully, even if I had to pay them out of my pocket I'd still use a real estate agent for buying property, especially if it's out of town. If something is really wrong they've got a fiduciary duty to inform you about anything material to the value of the property. If they don't they're risking their license and an E&O claim against their broker. I've found the combination of internet research and a good local agent to be the best combination for my property purchases. Trust but verify what they're telling me.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Get a buyer's agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you get a buyers agent make sure that you pay a flat rate or they will have some incentive to walk the price up on you. They are suppose to be on your side, but if they are getting a percentage then they have incentive to raise the price.

    2. Re:Get a buyer's agent by EricTheGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Excellent advice, except for...

      The buyer's agent normally gets their cut from the seller.

      Run, do not walk, from anyone presenting him/herself as a buyer's agent, but being paid by the seller. By definition, the agent's interests then align with the property seller, not yours.

      The check needs to come from you, preferably as a retainer + post-close commission, rather than set-fee up front.

    3. Re:Get a buyer's agent by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Use real estate agents to find property, and to list it.

      Use your inspectors and your lawyers to research it before buying it.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  58. Diversity? by QMO · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Diversity" means one thing : CRIME and WELFARE

    Interesting that you put "diversity" in quotes.

    When we moved to our current apartment my wife looked up some crime stats for various neighborhoods.

    With 100 as the national average:
    Some areas of Newark, NJ were 400 or more.
    The small town where I went to high school (about 2000 pop, 50 miles from nearest Mc Donald's) was about 25 or so, IIRC. The town has significant Mexican (ex-pat) and Navajo populations.
    The town where our apartment is, rated 4. That's right, single digit, 4.

    This is the most diverse place I've ever lived, or visited. On my short block (duplexes and single-family homes) there are at least 6 native languages.
    My daughter's first grade class had a variety of Christians along with Jews, Muslims, Buddists, and I don't know what religion the kid from Mongolia follows. The school has maybe 20 students that would qualify for free or reduced school lunch.
    When I'm in church on Sunday I talk to people from Nigeria, Jamaica, Haiti, Mexico, Chile, Peru, Germany, Philipines, Eastern Europe, etc.

    We happened to drive through one of those very high crime areas of Newark and my daughter had a question. "Why is everyone the same color?"

    Result: In my (perhaps not statistically significant experience) it is the lack of diversity that has a positive correlation with crime and welfare. So, I think it's interesting that you put "diversity" in quotes.

    The trouble is that I doubt that I'll ever be able to afford to buy a home in the town where I live.

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:Diversity? by grimJester · · Score: 1

      At the low end of the socioeconomic spectrum you have disadvantaged minoritíes. At the really high end you have a fairly international crowd. I bet median income or median wealth in your and GP's neighborhood correlates more strongly with crime statistics than any ethnicity figures you can come up with.

    2. Re:Diversity? by QMO · · Score: 1

      I can't argue with that, and in fact I think that's generally true.

      Still, the town where I went to high school would definitely be at the low end of the economic spectrum.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    3. Re:Diversity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad story about how some people see "diversity" (quotes intended).

      When we moved into a cul-de-sac in a recently developed Northern California area, we were shocked when on the third day, two neighbors came over to introduce themselves. They were gushing about the other neighbors, then joked about "diversity" and apologized for the African American family living down the street. We were utterly appalled. Fortunately we never met any other neighbors for the three years we were there.

      Even worse, it was an expensive well-kept area (a step above the cookie-cutter CCNR sprawl, IMHO), and ~2months after we left, a huge FBI squad descended and removed a kid-pr0n ring four doors down!!!

  59. So, what are you trying to justify? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Morality is subjective; the morality of an action cannot be immoral in fact, but only in someone's opinion."

    My subject line is not serious.
    I know that there are people that claim to believe in moral relativism.
    I know that many actually have talked themselves into believing it, against all logic.
    I also know that nearly always people who believe in a subjective morality so so in order to justify something that they themselves believe to be wrong.

    The not serious comes in because I don't really want to know what you're trying to justify.

    1. Re:So, what are you trying to justify? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no logical proofs for moral absolutism and there are no logical proofs refuting moral relativism. All we can really say is that the belief in moral relativism is a better one because it doesn't rely on invented outside elements.

      You can project all of your personal shortcomings as much as you want to, some people don't feel guilty about seeing morality for what it is. Ethics, now, that's a different beast, but morality is subjective.

      So, I guess the question for you is: what are you feeling guilty for justifying?

    2. Re:So, what are you trying to justify? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "I know that there are people that claim to believe in moral relativism. I know that many actually have talked themselves into believing it, against all logic."

      I know people who actually believe in moral absolutism -- people who actually have convinced themselves to have blanket faith in something that defies logic at its very foundation.

      Not to be too snarky -- but faith in moral absolutes is exactly the same as faith in religion (often intertwined), or even creationism. It is the belief in undemonstrable, untestable universal postulates that is totally illogical, IMO.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:So, what are you trying to justify? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The logical and practical arguments against moral relativism are so obvious that I'm amazed you claim their non-existence.

      Logical: Moral relativism posits that all moralities are equally valid. Suppose that my morality holds that moral relativism is invalid... (i.e. moral relativism is logically self-inconsistent)

      Practical: Moral relativism means anything goes, as long as you can create a "moral system" that accepts it. This means, practically speaking, nothing is immoral. (i.e. moral relativism is practically self-inconsistent)

      I was trying to think of any possible explainations for claiming that these arguments don't exist, but they all seemed like I was merely trying to insult you, so I left them out.

      This was posted as AC in an attempt to decrease the likelyhood of a flamewar. Consistent with that aim, I'm done here.

  60. What knack? by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Funny

    From TFA: This might help explain why Greg Tanner, who says he has a knack for "turning one dollar into two dollars," is now more than $30,000 in debt.

    Sounds like it should be the other way around. He's doing great turning two dollars into one.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  61. Dumbasses by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    They deserve everything they get if they can't be bothered to check out what they're buying in person.

  62. HOW MANY TIMES? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times do I have to tell people: a house is not an investment? At best, all costs considered, you're barely outpacing inflation. At worst, you're paying too much and won't have any money left for actually, you know, living. The only investments you should do online are setting up automatic withdrawals from your paycheck into energy and precious metals funds.

    1. Re:HOW MANY TIMES? by 0bject · · Score: 1

      If you purchase a house within your budget, make a decent down payment, and live in it for a few years to build up some more equity, then for many people a house can be the best investment they'll ever make.

    2. Re:HOW MANY TIMES? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Laughable. Invest 10000$ in energy funds, in ten years it'll be worth 5 times that. Try that with a house. I invest nothing more than money into my energy funds. A homeowner will have to pay assorted taxes, upkeep, and fill the house with stuff. Overall if you're honest with yourself, a house is just about the worst vehicle for an investment there is. It's great for the banks, because they rake in the interest, and they can lend you even more money agaisnt the house.

      Being in debt your whole life is not much of a plan. Making 40000$ in 10 years for doing nothing, that's an investment. Don't forget that during those ten years, you can easily keep plowing 10000$/year into the fund if you don't have expenses like a house to drag you down. Saving 800$ a month is a joke if you live in a cheap apartment.

      And my investment is all cash, baby. A house you have to sell before you see a penny of your "investment". And, since housing always works in bubbles, all the other houses went up as well, so even if your house is worth a million so is every other house. So you end up with NO MONEY AT ALL, because you still have to live somewhere! All you have is a house.

      Granted, I have little space for my hobbies, but I enjoy living frugally in a major city.

    3. Re:HOW MANY TIMES? by 0bject · · Score: 1

      >A homeowner will have to pay assorted taxes, upkeep, and fill the house with stuff.
      Unless you are living in your parents basement for free, then everywhere you live you have to pay for...I rather be paying paying some of that back to myself.

      >Overall if you're honest with yourself, a house is just about the worst vehicle for an investment there is.
      I strongly disagree here and I know I won't convince you, but even if you're right it IS still an investment, whereas your apartment is only a money sink. You will never ever see a return on your monthly bill to rent.

      >Being in debt your whole life is not much of a plan.
      Whole life? Not if you're smart and pay off principle early and often...and while you are doing that you can take a nice deductible of your taxes.

      >And, since housing always works in bubbles, all the other houses went up as well, so even if your house is worth a million so is every other house
      Most people don't sell their house so they can move into the next door neighbor's house...

      >Granted, I have little space for my hobbies, but I enjoy living frugally in a major city.
      I have plenty of space and I pay less in mortgage then some of my friends pay for a 1 bedroom appartment. Oh and because my mortgage is low I can make other investments in addition to my house...That whole not having all your eggs in one basket thing.

    4. Re:HOW MANY TIMES? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With an average 30-year mortgage, one will end up paying TWICE the value of their house due to interest. So if you buy for $250K, over 30 years you will end up paying ~$500K. With appreciation, your house will only be worth ~$400K (if you're lucky), plus it will be old and outdated. How is that a good investment? Invest $500K over 30 years and you will be a millionaire. A mortgage is not a good investment.

    5. Re:HOW MANY TIMES? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Granted, my position only works for me. Since we don't know where each other lives, it is hard to compare. One of the big things with getting a house is you have to get a car. That's another HUGE money sink right there. However, people with cars are why my energy funds are through the stratosphere :).

      And your house is still not cash in your hands. You can only borrow money against it knowing that the bank can do all kinds of nasty things to you if you can't repay.

      How do you consider the interest you're paying on the mortgage if you think rent on an "apartment is only a money sink". How do you consider the water taxes, school taxes, welcome tax, city tax, etc... ???

    6. Re:HOW MANY TIMES? by Bassman59 · · Score: 1
      How many times do I have to tell people: a house is not an investment?

      True, especially since if you sell your house and you want to live in the same city, clearly you'll pay more for your next house, and any profit you've made gets eaten up by the new house.

    7. Re:HOW MANY TIMES? by 0bject · · Score: 1

      That is true if you stick to the payment plan the bank lays out, but any payments over that go straight to principal which decreases the interest you have to pay and the length of time it takes to pay off the loan.

      I forget the exact formula but one example is for a monthly payment of $370...if you pay $400 per month you save 84 monthly payments of $370 with a net savings in interest of $22,000+. Of course if you pay more principal you'll save more in interest.

      Another bonus of owning is that you can actively have some control on the value of your investment. Simply by taking good care of your house and making small improvements can increase the selling price of your house, while at the same time (obviously) increasing your own quality of life.

  63. Buying wilderness by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    For example, wilderness purchases if you should have the inclination to build a getaway cabin. Granted, there are no structures most of the time, it's just the land.
    Unless, of course, the land turns out to be an environmental preserve, preserved wetlands, home to an endangered species, contaminated by toxic waste, etc...

    Yeah, perfectly safe.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  64. Debt in America by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    The other thing that's interesting is that the economy is moving from one based upon capital to one based upon debt. Americans, supposedly, owe more on credit cards than their net worth - as a whole (not the average!). This, combined with insane mortgages, and huge trade and federal budget defecits, will eventually weaken the military power of the United States, which is why it was allowed to happen in the first place. Americans are basically being sucked into the biggest usury racket ever.
    Nothing new. Just look at what happened to people in the famous stock crash. They were "speculating," buying shares with the money they expected to get and when the market crashed, they were toast.

    Personally, I try to avoid debt as much as possible. I bought my car outright. I don't carry balances on my credit card. If I can't afford to buy something outright, I take a good hard look at whether I'd actually need it. Most everyone in my family works this way, supposedly a legacy of my great-grandfather losing everything in the Crash and passing on the wisdom to his children. We've been lucky enough to be prosperous enough to maintain things this way (I know that there's a good chance I won't be able to buy my house outright as my parents did, for instance), but it's also a matter of good sense, living within our means.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  65. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Jews are typically classified as Caucasian. It's true that various places in the world there are small groups of non-white Jews, but almost all Jews in the United States are white.

    (I'm not [nor do I agree with] the original poster, so don't mod me down by assocation; I'm just clearing up a misconception.)

  66. Island by lazarus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought a 6 acre freshwater island sight-unseen on-line two years ago. Of course I did call around to make sure that the local planning office knew of the island and would give me a building permit for it. I also checked google satellite imagery to check on the overall shape and location of the island before I bought it. But I had 24 hours to do all of the research and make all of the connections before I signed on the dotted line.

    Result? In my case I couldn't be happier. It is exactly what I was hoping for (well, except for the really bad case of poison ivy I got there last summer...) Bottom line: Use *all* of the technology you have access to if you have to make a decision like that. Even antiquated ones like the telephone.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:Island by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Land is almost always a safe buy sight unseen. Assuming you at least glance at a map to see if there's a quarry or oil drilling operated next door.

      Buildings never are, unless you're going to tear them down.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  67. Re:Loads freaky ebay stuff that's too good to be t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the best bit is # 11 - range 120m - that's about 393 feet....

  68. My Family Sold a House Online by maggard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    About 10 years ago my mother and her sister bought a summer house in Nova Scotia, Canada. Both are from there, though nowhere near where they bought the house and they now live in Boston, Mass. & Vancouver, B.C. respectively. However it was a pretty place, along a river, 100 acres, two barns, woods, orchard, fantastic year-round neighbors, good deal, etc.

    However my aunt is a real estate agent and after a few years of flying cross-country for vacations wondered if her investment money wouldn't be more productive elsewhere. So almost on a lark she listed on an online auction site, no commitment to sell. And the bidding went insane!

    So she called up Mom, confessed what she had done, then agreed that if the silly numbers were true they'd sell. They ended up having a prospective buyer fly up from Texas and stay in the house for a few days. The buyer loved the place, made an offer that was jaw-dropping by local real estate values, and the place was sold.

    However, the buyer was from Texas, i.e. a US citizen. This hadn't been an issue for my mother, after 40-some years in the US she has always remained Canadian, but they did warn the buyer they'd have to look into local laws, particularly as they were dog-breeders and planning to use the barns for kennels, etc.

    (By the way, Nova Scotia is cheap and trying hard to make itself attractive to retirees; if you're looking for a vacation place or to retire it's a great place to consider!)

    Anyway, within a few years the new buyer had to sell. They'd not done their homework and had instead simply moved and started selling dogs. Apparently when informed they'd have to leave the country and immigrate the legal way they didn't find a peer online to sell the house to and instead sold at a rate far more in keeping with the local norms, and thus took a complete bath on the whole process.

    So my family had a GREAT experience, others might not do so well...

    Oh, and there's my buddy Richard, who buys a new eMachine PC on sale every year, images it's drive, pulls out and replaces the parts he doesn't care for, then a year later sets it back up the way he got it and sells it online, every time for more then he'd bought it for a year earlier! There really is another sucker online every minute!

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  69. I can sum this up in one word... by Hee+Hee+Hee · · Score: 1

    I can sum this up in one word...

    DUH!

    --
    - Bill
  70. Re:Loads freaky ebay stuff that's too good to be t by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 1

    More like 633,600 feet.

  71. Three words to live by... by csoto · · Score: 1

    caveat emptor, dumbass!

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  72. Here's an idea by moochfish · · Score: 1

    Thinking about spending $100,000? Spend $200 for a plane ticket to check the place out first.

  73. This is news? by technomom · · Score: 1

    Really no difference between this and the Florida swamplands that people were sold many years ago. The "online" part just makes it a little easier to reach out to the pigeons.

    JoAnn

  74. Except that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...those links disappear somewhere between 60 and 90 days (it fluctuates). Keep in mind that you also only have 30 days to leave a negative feedback, because it's been explicitly tied to the auction number for years now. So, really, the strategy is a winner so long as you 1) have a prepaid credit card and 2) enough patience to do small, legitimate transactions for 4 or 5 months. It's not the only route either. Frankly, this is just another good reason to be extremely wary of spending more than $100 over such a service.

    EBay, in a disproportionate number of cases, will side with the seller. Why? Probably in part because they're the ones paying the ever increasing listing fees! For instance, as long as you receive a box, empty or otherwise, Paypal will usually not even hear your case. Should you be in such an uneviable situation, your only hope is a dumb scammer or an upstanding employee.

    Short of getting educated about the subject matter (be it real estate or collectibles), the best advice, posted above several times, is to never risk what you can't afford to lose. Learn to do both and you will never be significantly hurt by this sort of fraud again.

  75. Yes, I wonder... by Wavicle · · Score: 1
    From TFA: Mr. Tanner, whose business partner has declared bankruptcy, said he lay in bed at night, wondering where he went wrong.

    Well, let's see...
    1. You bought a piece of real property, sight unseen
    2. In a neighborhood you knew nothing about
    3. From an agent you never met in person
    4. You placed no contingency on a home inspection
    5. You had repairs done by someone you didn't know
    6. Who the agent reccomended

    Folks, if you're going to invest in real property, as with many things in life, get a professional or two on your side. Hire your own real estate broker, home inspector and contractor. Your profit margin may be smaller. So small that deals like this don't make sense economically. But if just one of these deals goes south, as this one did, it will cost you 3 or 4 more deals that work out just to break even. Having your own set of licenses, bonded professionals will ensure that at most 1 in 20 deals turns out to be a lemon.

    A few hundred dollars spent on an independent home inspector would have saved this guy tens of thousands. Then again, the seller probably would have argued against or just plain refused to allow an inspection. Then again, if a seller tries to stop an inspection DON'T BUY. How obvious is that?
    --
    Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
    Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    1. Re:Yes, I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having just bought my first house and having had a great realtor and team behind me, I can't agree more with this post. Independent advice is an absolute must.

      I can understand the occasional need for an individual who is getting transferred thousands of miles away to house shop online via a real estate web site like URL:http://www.har.com and then going through an agent to make the purchase. What I can't understand is shopping for real property on something like eBay and then going it alone. The only reasons I come come up with for these folks buing sight unseen is naivete and greed. Shame on them for acting surprised when the whole rotten thing comes crashing down on their heads. Another example of people thinking the computer is doing the thinking for them.

  76. SFW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tempted to check this, but afraid to while at work, knowing the Dutch...

    1. Re:SFW? by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it's completely SFW :)

  77. Alternative evaluation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Can't think of a better way to measure what something is worth than by what price someone is willing to pay for it. Can you?"

    How about the discounted value of the cash flows a property would generate if it were rented?

  78. Semantics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The New York Times investigates negative experiences of people buying investment real estate online.
    I believe the word you meant was speculation.
  79. No - That is a freeloader speeding inflation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A guy buys a house for $X and turns around selling it for $X+$40,000.
    the only thing flippers do is drive up inflation,
    devalue the American dollar,
    lead families into house-poor poverty,
    and enrich opportunist banks charging heavy interest rates.

    Ahh, the sweet, sweet smell of pure capitalism,
    predatory lenders never had it this easy before!

    Thank you, you worthless sacks of crap,
    thank you for leading Americans down the path of life time debt slave labor.

    Americans should abandon cities that charge property tax, and basically boycott whole states for being pimp daddies whoring out their population to loan sharks.

  80. End of the bubble? by kiwi77 · · Score: 1

    Seems to me, as I recall, when everyone wants to do it and it gets real easy to do, the end is near and the bubble has burst. Is stuff like this (buying real estate sight unseen over the internet, for God's sake)a sign that the real estate has burst? My answer would be yes. When people are so anxious to buy, sight unseen, with the feeling that they can only make money, the end is near. Hold onto your pocketbooks and wallets!

  81. Can't Understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't understand this. Didn't your mom tell you not to trust strangers? I mean, I personally would really think twice about paying anything more than $20 to a person I never met. Isn't the internet supposed to be great because of its anonymity? If not, why do people make such a fuss saying privacy violation, etc.?

    We need to make up our mind. Do we want our privacy to be preserved (which means other's anonymity is preserved, which means they are less trustworthy)? Or do we want the internet to become like a banking system, where everyone must show government issued ID before being allowed to make a transaction? If we want the internet to become like the banking system, why have the internet - we can just go the traditional route and contact a real realtor.

  82. That's not what s/he said! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    They didn't say "only buy from established, known companies".

    They said that when you *do* bbuy from other companies, don't be surprised if you lose your money.

    It's a risk. The problem is that we live in a society that doesn't want to acknowledge, or even allow, risks. Risks aren't necessarily bad. Sometimes taking them is the best thing you can do.

    But be alert, determine the risk, and decide if it's worth it to you.