Slashdot Mirror


Claria Leaves Adware Business

Alex Stern writes "In an attempt to clean up its tarnished name, Claria has hired Deutsche Bank to help them sell off the software tools that were previously supported by their adware. Claria says they are unwilling to sell the software for the GAIN ad network, or the data they have collected from their users. Claria is also holding on to their eWallet software that manages passwords. On July 1, Claria will shutdown the GAIN network and inform their users they can either uninstall their software or pay for it. Claria's new business model is 'a new platform designed to provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience.'"

149 comments

  1. MS antispyware by The+Lerneaen+Hydra · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Now that (officially) they wont log data, does this mean MS antispyware will be set to default remove?

    1. Re:MS antispyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      MSAS is actually set to ignore Claria
      http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2005/07/microsoft- sets-claria-to-ignore.html

      shows you how much we/people can trust MS for malware removal, probably $ related

    2. Re:MS antispyware by Teun · · Score: 1

      A valid question, so who is the Troll that marked this as Offtopic?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  2. Tarnished name. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think you can clear a name that has been into spyware. I know I won't trust them for anything else they might do...

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Tarnished name. by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't immediatly say that. They might have actualy decided to change their evil ways. They could create something extremely useful.

    2. Re:Tarnished name. by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I translated the move to mean "our adware product is now so ubiquitously blocked that it's become hard to make money with it, so we're selling it to some other sucker and finding a new area to sleeze in."

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Tarnished name. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      That's okay, they'll just change it again anyway.

    4. Re:Tarnished name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't sound very trustworthy to me.

      User data once gathered through that system to target ads in Claria's GAIN and BehaviorLink networks will no longer be used.

      If they aren't destroying the data, it's because they think they might want to use the data.

    5. Re:Tarnished name. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Oh, come now, RealMedia "changed their ways" and now everybody loves them! I mean, look at the grassroots campaign they successfully waged against iTunes! Won't it be the same for Claria?

    6. Re:Tarnished name. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      But at least it's one less piece of crap we all have to put up with.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    7. Re:Tarnished name. by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Only in your wildest dreams. That would be something similar to a zebra and a leopard tradeing skin patterns, it just tain't done. To the leopard, a zebra is lunch, not a sex partner.

      --
      Cheers, Gene

    8. Re:Tarnished name. by TangoCharlie · · Score: 1

      Indeed. They may produce a really useful peice of software... but the question
      still remains: would you trust them?
      Personally, the answer for me is No.
      Trust has to be earned.... unfortunately, once someone's trust has been breached, they're unlikely to give the trespasser a second chance.
      I for one hope the new Claria all the best in their new venture, but I for one, will not be one of their customers.

      --
      return 0; }
    9. Re:Tarnished name. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      You've got it. Since Microsoft bought them, they need to avoid poisoning the well for more important Microsoft products like Internet Explorer and Windows by pushing adware that helps bog down Windows systems and show its lack of security and softwrae management.

      What I'd like to see out of Claria is a published list of the authors of the software and most especially of their manager, to use as an employment blacklist for more ethical companies.

  3. Some assets! by Random+Q.+Hacker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh boy, a screen saver. Let me whip out my billion dollars in venture capital for that!

    1. Re:Some assets! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Wait at least until they change their name to "eClaira" (or maybe "iClaria"), that's when you know you have a winner.

    2. Re:Some assets! by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      Answer: an eClaria

      Question: What do you call an electronic copy of an elongated pastry filled with custard and iced with chocolate?

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    3. Re:Some assets! by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      WOW! You guys get custard in the middle? Geez! We only get cream!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  4. and Charles Manson... by Fhqwhgadss · · Score: 5, Funny

    is now knitting little sweaters for orphaned puppies.

    --
    How does a 7-person democracy cut a pie? Into 4 pieces.
    1. Re:and Charles Manson... by Afecks · · Score: 3, Funny

      but the sweaters are made from human skin. so it all kind of balances out...

  5. Personalized Internet experience? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In other words, spying on what you do on the 'net....

    1. Re:Personalized Internet experience? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Really! Claria's "new business model"?? What did they do? Find a new way around our spyware detection software? Or maybe they figure the FBI or NSA can do the spying for them. And now that your IRS records will be up for sale, they can just buy what they need from H&R Block.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Personalized Internet experience? by smeenz · · Score: 1

      I open websites in an order and arrangement that is unique to me. Sounds pretty personal already.

  6. Next story... by Luigi30 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A new company starts up called Claritor, who restarts the GAIN network...

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    1. Re:Next story... by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually a quote in the article does raise an interesting question about that:

      On July 1, Claria will shutdown the GAIN network and inform their users they can either uninstall their software or pay for it.

      So, does that mean that if you installed ad-supported freeware that uses Claria's spyware to help pay for it, that that's what they're talking about when the say "pay off or shut off?" Does that mean that they're going to trip off whatever mechanism prevents you from using such software after Claria's uninstalled without uninstalling the client software? What about software that uses multiple spyware vendors?

      Okay, well honestly, I don't really care that much about people careless enough to use programs that install spyware, but it does beg an interesting question of liability if they attempt to technologically enforce their suggestion that one should either pay or uninstall.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Next story... by Mateito · · Score: 1

      More importantly, are they going to provide all the information required to actually uninstall this thing?

    3. Re:Next story... by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that they're going to trip off whatever mechanism prevents you from using such software after Claria's uninstalled without uninstalling the client software?

      I'm waiting for the date just so we can see how many infected machines break down once the network becomes unavailable. I hope a reporter is on this angle, because I don't think it's beyond the pale that poorly-written spyware has well-written error handling, especially for core functionality.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    4. Re:Next story... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Hadn't thought about that, but I can see the report on the "newest worm outbreak cripples computers across the globe" actually being GAIM shutting down their network. :)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    5. Re:Next story... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Ask your doctor about Claritor. Be sure to tell him if you run Windows or might ever run Windows. Side effects, while rare, may include adware, spyware and putting a foot through your monitor.

      rj

    6. Re:Next story... by lorelorn · · Score: 1
      The story was summarising.

      What they will actually say to existing users is "pay up or we'll erase your hard drive."

    7. Re:Next story... by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      "So, does that mean that if you installed ad-supported freeware that uses Claria's spyware to help pay for it, that that's what they're talking about when the say "pay off or shut off?" Does that mean that they're going to trip off whatever mechanism prevents you from using such software after Claria's uninstalled without uninstalling the client software?"

      I read that as Claria's clients - not the (Ahem) their 'User Base'

      You too can subscribe to their database!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  7. Personalized Internet experience? by gluecode · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> Claria's new business model is 'a new platform designed to >> provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience.'" To create a personalized Internet experience, don't they have to collect more intimate user information?

  8. Conditions of the sale crack me up by LiftOp · · Score: 5, Funny
    A condition of any sale of Claria's consumer software applications will be the requirement that any purchaser agrees to adhere to emerging industry standards outlined by TRUSTe and other industry coalitions.

    So what's the going rate for buying a product line and promising not to use it?

    1. Re:Conditions of the sale crack me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC bids 0.01 USD.

    2. Re:Conditions of the sale crack me up by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      >AC bids 0.01 USD.

      I wouldn't do that before reading the actual sale contract. If there's a clause about "adoping all assets, liabilities, etc." you could be adoping a bucket of debt for your penny. It wouldn't be the first time a scummy company tried to offload it's financial liabilities onto someone else.

    3. Re:Conditions of the sale crack me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the case ZiffCorp vs Simpson comes to mind.

    4. Re:Conditions of the sale crack me up by DSP_Geek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Truste? Those douches? They gave Gratis Internet a clean bill of health on privacy while GI sold every email address it could dredge up, not to mention playing nice with any number of mainstream email baggers. A certification from them is just about good enough to wipe your butt with. Nice to see Gator still has the same lofty *ahem* standards it always did.

      I'm guessing the VCs realized the IPO would be as popular as shares in Mengele Health Farms, and told manglement to find something else so they could cash out.

  9. So what by davmoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pond scum by any other name is still pond scum. And no matter how they change their product line-up, pond scum is still pond scum.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't insult Pond scum by comparing it with an adware company.

    2. Re:So what by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 4, Funny

      But now it comes in 6 new flavors!

      --
      Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    3. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if it's *personalized* pond scum?

  10. AmEx? by Hazy+Memory · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real question is: can I pay with American Express or will they only take visa and mastercard. Don't take my GATOR away!!!

  11. Yeah. Right. Good luck. by ankhcraft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Claria's new business model is 'a new platform designed to provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience.'

    Sounds like a recipe for failure to me. I doubt the value that they add is going to be enough to make people want to pay for their software. I doubt that very much.

    Why would anybody pay for software to pre-populate fields w/ credit cards, addresses, etc. when Internet Explorer and Firefox can already do that for free? (If you're into that sort of thing.)

    Hello toilet, goodbye Claria.

    --
    ...
  12. Isn't it ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Claria's new business model is 'a new platform designed to provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience.'

    Yeah, they *would* know what a personalized experience is.

  13. Yeah, uh huh. by Valar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Claria's new business model is 'a new platform designed to provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience.'"

    No doubt by spying on you, showing you ads, AND making you pay for the software that does it.

    Thanks, but no thanks.

    1. Re:Yeah, uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Kinda' like every website on the Internet does, even our beloved Google. Google spies and shows me ads. Even when I'm visiting M-W.com. Google to me is scarier than a Claria because everyone just accepts whatever Google does. At least people are keeping an eye on Claria.

      Time to start investing in anonymizer start-ups for when the revolution hits and people will no longer stand for being tracked at every turn on the Internet.

    2. Re:Yeah, uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonimizing software?

      Three words: The Onion Router

      Do a google for "TOR" if you really want to be secure, and it you use public computers, check out TorPark.

      Note to a mod: the word verification is a good idea, but try making it a little easier for a human to read. I'm 19 and I've got better than 20/20 vision, but over half this image is thick, 10 pixel lines. I've got more black lines than black text. Eeek! Thanks.

    3. Re:Yeah, uh huh. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. I am getting worried about Google, and NO ONE ELSE but you seem to understand how Google can turn bad very quickly.
      Too many fingers in too many pies. Everybody is so concerned about operating systems and other apps, but not the next level up.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    4. Re:Yeah, uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference for me is that google can't tie my search to my name, address, phone #, credit card #, etc, but that's what Claria's software tries to do.

  14. Translation... by AnonymousPrick · · Score: 4, Interesting
    FTFA: At that time, people currently using any GAIN-related software products will be offered the chance to uninstall them, or continue using them through the new purchaser.

    So, some other company is going to continue business as usual? I don't care what sort of agreement the new owners have to abide by, there's always a way around such things. For all we know, the new purchaser could be just another entity that's owned by Claria via several layers of legal entities.

    --
    Saturday is April 1. Slashdot will be shut down. Sorry for the inconvenience.
  15. So.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a new platform designed to provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience

    So they'll be releasing a tool bar, which will do all of this again and claim other wise?

    --
    I like muppets.
  16. Heh by yamla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, they are going forward to start a legitimate business based on the profits and contacts they've made in the ad-ware (some may say spy-ware) business? If they really wanted to turn over a new leaf, they'd dissolve the corporation and return all the money to the shareholders.

    --

    Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just silly. You're asking for Mother Theresa out of a corporation? Name me one business that made money off far worse, say knowingly allowed workers to get black lung, and then shed all money in the bank when they started protecting the workers.

      Claria's past is shady, but at least bust them on the valid points.

  17. Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Claria says they are unwilling to sell the software for the GAIN ad network, or the data they have collected from their users."

    Uh, why? Did they wake up some morning and magically get some ethics? Or are they afraid of what people will discover?

    They should get (another) name change at the same time. Most people know the relationship Claria == Gator == spyware/adware == scum.

    1. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      why not sell the data ?

      because Claria (did)have one of the biggest databases of user information on the planet
      http://www.wintercorp.com/vldb/2003_TopTen_Survey/ TopTenWinners.asp

      12TB (in 2003) of data isnt something they are wanting to sell

  18. Re:Yeah. Right. Good luck. by gbulmash · · Score: 1
    'Claria's new business model is 'a new platform designed to provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience.'

    Ooh, like the personalized internet assistant, Bonzi Buddy? Or maybe it will be as widely loved as Clippy.

  19. How is Spyware Legal? by SisyphusShrugged · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have always had trouble understanding how spyware can be legal anyway...

    I mean basically the company is spying on you, its similar to if Walmart hired someone to constantly stalk you and take notes on what kind of shampoo you buy...it just does not seem logical.

    But then who said laws have to be logical, I mean the RIAA/MPAA DMCA CRAP states that for each movie/song one downloads the loss to the companies is the hundreds of thousands of dollars, doesnt really make sense does it...

    1. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      The internet spans nations and have no laws, you can't stop things because they will skip places in the real world to avoid your laws.

      --
      I like muppets.
    2. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by It'sYerMam · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I mean basically the company is spying on you, its similar to if Walmart hired someone to constantly stalk you and take notes on what kind of shampoo you buy...it just does not seem logical.
      I'm assuming you don't own any supermarket loyalty cards.
      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    3. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Try telling that to China, which has its Great Firewall and a patted-down version of Google.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    4. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Its very simple. At least in the united states, when YOU do it, its a crime. When a company does it, "its just good business."

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    5. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why would a store not have a right to spy on you? They already do this anyway. Heard of security cameras? Someone sits in a dark room in the back looking.

      If you have a credit/debit card or a store membership card, they do this too.

      Your analogy doesn't really fit.. Spyware is something you generally are tricked into installing, deceived into installing, or it is installed without your permission, period, onto YOUR computer. When you are in someone else's store, you don't get to dictate who can and can't peep around while you're buying shampoo and condoms.

    6. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by thestobor · · Score: 1

      Or pay with credit/debit cards at said supermarket...

    7. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      At least WalMart isn't slipping loyalty cards into your wallet without your knowledge that automatically "phone home" and collect data about all sorts of activities not related to shopping.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    8. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Insightful
      'm assuming you don't own any supermarket loyalty cards.

      There are three differences here. First, you have to specifically request the card and fill out an application. (Most spyware installs itself without telling you.) Second,you are explicitly agreeing to let the market track your purcheses when you get the card. (Spyware doesn't even ask.) Last, you are paid for that by the discounts you get. (Spyware gives back nothing.)

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by netsharc · · Score: 1
      By clicking the "I agree" button, you agree to ____


      Feel free to put anything in the blank.
      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    10. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Quite a number of GAIN installs are probably from GAIN-supported software, such as DivX Pro (I have no idea if they still bundle GAIN for the free version still, but they used to). Gator itself is a data remembering app. Bonsai Buddy provided a talking ape. Thus yes, spyware does tend to give you something. Whether it's worth it is another matter.

    11. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong again here. The loyalty cards are giving you discounts. Period. And in teeny, tiny print in the agreement, it says they will watch your purchases in legalese. Claria's "assets" do the same thing. They scream, "Free screensaver" and, in tiny print, that they will serve you ads. So both are "slipping their cards into your wallet without your knowledge and phoning home." You just like Wal-Mart more apparently and are willing to accept more of their shit. Claria is no saint, but people's passions drive them to very irrational behavior, as the Gator/Claria name does on Slashdot. You can never have a sane discussion about abortion for the same reason. If Claria did something illegal, they'd get sued, like 180Solutions did. Hate the business model, not the business.

    12. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by GregAndreou · · Score: 1

      I thought most supermarkets done that anyway with a loyalty card or some similar scheme. Not sure about Walmart of course as I don't live in the USA.

      --
      My freedom ends where someone else's begins
    13. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      One more. At least in my area, they hand you the card and say please fill out this form and send it in. You mean some people actually do that?

      rj

    14. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Where I live, they're at the checkstands. You take one, fill it out and they hand you the card. Yes, lots and lots of people do it. The automatic discounts can save you hundreds of dollars a year, often on the brand you would have bought anyway. For those of us on limited incomes, it can mean the difference between just barely enough to eat, and having nice meals. If you shop at the same supermarket regularly and don't have their card, you're only hurting yourself.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    15. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Of course, a lot of those cards have the "I don't want to fill out my personal information" box you can check instead (I know albertson's does.)

      Barring that, you could always just say you're A. Lincoln from Illinois.

    16. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word

    17. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Zitchas · · Score: 1
      As far as such cards go, they can be sabotaged... Me and several of my friends all use the same loyalty card, which actually belongs to the mother of of them. So we all get discounts, she gets whatever credit she gets for so many purchases, and the company gets one really messed up customer profile.

      This would be the main difference between said loyalty cards and spyware. The loyalty card we can pass aroud between a whole lot of us, effectiely rendering it's determination of our "unique purchasing pattern" worthless, (since not only are the users not part of the same demographic as the card's actual holder, but there's a bunch of us magnifying it). The spyware, we can't.

      Furthur more, the loyalty card we can throw out, lose, or just plain decide on a day to day basis whether to use or not. The Spyware, you can't. It all comes down to choice. Now, if they gave you, say, ten cents an hour that you browsed online while allowing the to track you, and you could turn it on or off at will, then that makes it reasonable. But as of yet, I see no reason for anyone to want it in the first place.

      --
      Z
    18. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Asda (Walmart UK) doesn't have one as far as I'm aware, but Tesco and Sainsburys do.

    19. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      China is still a massive source of spam and spyware. It's also a stunningly huge site for pirated software, especially Windows, Office, games, and DVD movies. The Chinese government takes no action again anything that brings in any revenue or avoids expenses for its populace, but anything that threatens the existing power structure (such as free speech or encrypted email) are slapped down hard.

      Spyware may be illegal there, but they're doing even less about it than the US government.

    20. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      Depends on your perspective. The way I see it they are charging a fee to customers who want to keep their privacy. If no one used those cards, then the stores that had lower prices regardless of whether or not you had a card would have a competetive advantage. Then none of the stores would bother with "loyalty to big brother" cards.

      Its a classic tragedy of the commons situation. By giving up your privacy you are screwing over the people who don't give up their privacy.

    21. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by fermion · · Score: 1
      There is no difference. In most modern spyware you are either explicitely or implicitely agreeing to have you movements tracked, either by clicking or using a product that is funded by the spyware.

      The disclosures for a supermarket card are no less broad or troublesome than spyware. In both cases the product is forced on you, and if you don't agree, the product is further forced on you though annoying popups or cashiers.

      Finaly, not all spyware comes with no return. Spyware may come as part of a software package that is presented as useful. Likewise the supermarkets present the card as a discount card, but in reality they are just jacking up the prices as a punishment for customers that do not have the card.

      I am fortunate as I do not need to use the software that has spyware attached. Likewise, I live a city big enough where I have retailers that will give me a good price without the use of tacking card. These retailers still compete on the basis of price and quality. I can go to one retailer when I want the best price, and another when I need specialtiy products. Niether demands that I present extra papers before they will be bothered to take my money. In fact I can easily get goods cheaper at my no-card retailer, and don't even have to suffer the shake down on exit.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    22. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      If no one used those cards, then the stores that had lower prices regardless of whether or not you had a card would have a competetive advantage.

      Not all, or even most of the markets using the cards are the expensive ones. Even the very inexpensive ones have them. Remember, you don't get a discount on everything, just selected items. If the average prices are high enough, even the discounts don't drop your bill enough to make it worth while to go there. About the only time it really changes shopping habits is if there are two stores close together and both store's average prices are about the same. Then, the one with the card has the advantage.

      Its a classic tragedy of the commons situation. By giving up your privacy you are screwing over the people who don't give up their privacy.

      That's just, plain silly. Giving them your name, address and phone number isn't giving up your privacy, especially as they make no effort to check out what you put down. You can, if you want, sign up as Richard Nixon, and give your number as (976) 739-6969 and they won't care. The only reason they want your phone number, BWT, is that if you forget your card, you can give them the phone number you used to get the card and that will ID you for the discounts. If you're that sure that they're going to use the data to invade your privacy, why aren't you posting as AC to keep your identity sekret?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    23. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Likewise, I live a city big enough where I have retailers that will give me a good price without the use of tacking card.

      So do I. The funny thing is, however, that the markets with the best combination of price and quality all have the cards. There are two markets without them that I regulary patronize. One is a specialty shop where I can get good things I can't find elsewhere, the other is an ethnic market that I go to mostly for the ethnic goods that you can't get in a more mainstream location. You may be well-off enough that you don't have to care about the discounts, and if so, I'm glad. Right now, I'm on food stamps, and the difference is very significant.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    24. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Well, all the supermarkets in my area just hand you the card and a form. Doesn't matter if you send it in or not...the card still works. I've had cards from all the area markets for years, and they haven't the foggiest idea who I am.

      rj

    25. Re:How is Spyware Legal? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      You're wrong again here. The loyalty cards are giving you discounts. Period. And in teeny, tiny print in the agreement, it says they will watch your purchases in legalese.

      Two differences here: first, anybody that doesn't expect them to track what you buy is a fool. With spyware, you won't even know they're tracking you unless you take the time to read the fine print, and most people won't bother. Second, once in a while you're given a special coupon at the checkstand for a future purchase. It's always for a product you buy, but it's often for a different brand. This way, the manufacturors can focus their coupons on people who actually buy that sort of thing, instead of sending them out at random. If it's for a brand you've tried and don't like, you can just throw it away or give it to somebody else. No harm, no real inconvenience. If you've never tried it, you might; it might even be better than what you're getting now. I've used these cards for years, and so far, I've not found a downside to them. Of course, I don't care that they're tracking what I buy. If you do, YMMV.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  20. EDIII by chigun · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a trick, get an axe.

    --
    swanker than you
  21. That is the brilliant part of it by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    To create a personalized Internet experience, don't they have to collect more intimate user information?

    And the brilliant part of it is that the users will now pay for the privilege.
    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  22. What a blow to Deutsche Bank by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I were Deutsche Bank, I'd run from these guys like hell.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    1. Re:What a blow to Deutsche Bank by Hooya · · Score: 1

      they didn't run from SCO either.

    2. Re:What a blow to Deutsche Bank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Deutsche"

      Well, that name is a little more telling. Since any spyware company are by default "deutsch-bags."

    3. Re:What a blow to Deutsche Bank by maelstrom · · Score: 1

      Or VALinux

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
  23. Tricky description... by rscoggin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    'a new platform designed to provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience.' Sounds like they're going to release a browser with inbuilt spyware, like some preconfigured Firefox or something...

  24. Stop. by nastro · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's a trick. Get an axe.

  25. The criminal is in hideout. by ZoOnI · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess this means they won't be liable for any legal actions. I'd like to see a sopena of their records so we can see whom they sold their illegally gotten data. I wonder how many reputable businesses use this kind of info. They have the tools and infrastructure to start another venture on the lawless wild wild web, so we can expect to see them again when the heat is off, if this is more than postering.

    --
    "Never say Never."
  26. Those orgasmic shampoo and conditioner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    comercials by claria suck. Good riddance!

  27. Got enough info already by emo+boy · · Score: 1

    I guess they've got enough info to make enough of us uncomfortable.

  28. I'm not that naive. by Puls4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, but businesses don't get out of a market to "clean up their name". Something financial was driving this, though I don't know what. Are they scared of litigation, or did their revenue from ads drop? Was google stealing their market?

    1. Re:I'm not that naive. by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      I still have questions about the ability of a dog to change it's spots. I don't trust them since they have lied and sued about this before. I will continue to tell my customers that they are evil.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  29. People forgive/forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    George W Bush lied about WMD during his first term in office, but people forgot/forgave him and voted him in for a second term.

    A lot of people hated the Vietnam war and the soldiers who fought there, but now most have come to terms that the soldiers did what the country asked them to do, and had to go through hell and back.

    George S Patton was sometimes a really mean guy, but most people remember him as an excellent general.

    Microsoft has a terrible track record when it comes to security, but people still install their software.

    Union Carbide was responsible for 15,000 people's deaths in India, but the company is still alive and well.

    History tends to be nice to folks/corporations.

    1. Re:People forgive/forget by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "George W Bush lied about WMD during his first term in office, but people forgot/forgave him and voted him in for a second term."

      That was less about forgiving him and more about people being terrified of terrorists and/or gay marriage.

      "A lot of people hated the Vietnam war and the soldiers who fought there, but now most have come to terms that the soldiers did what the country asked them to do, and had to go through hell and back."

      It only took 10-15 years.

      "Microsoft has a terrible track record when it comes to security, but people still install their software."

      It's called a "monopoly" for a reason.

      "Union Carbide was responsible for 15,000 people's deaths in India, but the company is still alive and well."

      Few people in the US know, let alone care. Fewer still know how their purchaes support UC.

    2. Re:People forgive/forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      George W Bush lied about WMD during his first term in office, but people forgot/forgave him and voted him in for a second term.

      And so another ignorant dumbshit liberal speaks when he should be silent. Every intelligence agency in the world agreed Sadaam had WMD you moron. Just because he got them out to Syria or burried them somewhere in the desert and haven't been found yet doesn't mean they don't or didn't exist.

      Don't let the facts stop you from being a rabid hater though, that's the liberal strong suit.

    3. Re:People forgive/forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *LOL* Here... have another spoon of GWB propaganda.

    4. Re:People forgive/forget by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      [blockquote]Every intelligence agency in the world agreed Sadaam had WMD[/blockquote] It must be true because Bush said so on TV.
      The reality is that that every intelligence agency in the world agreed that Sadaam was no threat, and that Bush's motives were suspect.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    5. Re:People forgive/forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:People forgive/forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here... another liberal who believes half truths about 'Bush Lied, Troops Died' instead of thinking for (him/her)self.

      Must suck being a liberal democrat and not having any power.

      But don't let that convince you that the party lost because of faulty beliefs and loser leadership. It's a grand consipiracy by the 'stupid conservative republicans' who win time and time again. But you go ahead and try to rewrite history and say that WMD's never existed despite proof otherwise. you go ahead and believe that kerry wasn't a pile of **** and was robbed of the presidency.

      Meanwhile 'stupid' republicans will continue to win, get the job done and work towards the future - instead of crying about the past... poor liberal...

    7. Re:People forgive/forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't let the facts stop you from being a rabid hater though, that's the liberal strong suit.

      Show me one fact in your post and I might ignore your childish rant.

  30. Suck my balls, Claria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SUck it, suck it, suck it. Ownage. I will kick you in the groin if I ever see you, so that you may live a shameful existance or no existence at all. SUCK-IT.

    SUCK IT. And good riddence

  31. Chalk one up for Microsoft by republican+gourd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At first glance, this move on Claria's part seems nonsensical. They are gutting their business model and walking away from a very lucrative source of revenue, all in the name of (more or less) doing the right thing.

    Well, here's the rub.

    Vista is coming in 2007. Vista is going to have antispyware built directly into the operating system. By 2009, when XP is going to be a minority OS as people's crummy hardware dies (helped along by spyware infestations), there isn't going to be a market for Claria's BS.

    They quite simply have no other choice but to cash out what they can and change their profit model. (Of course, this is assuming that the anti-spyware elements of Vista will work at all... but like it or not, MS *does* have a lot of very bright people, and preventing modifications to critical system files *should* be a bit of a no brainer.)

    Here's hoping that the party is over.

    1. Re:Chalk one up for Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your post to a degree, but this isn't quite true:

      "preventing modifications to critical system files *should* be a bit of a no brainer"

      Ultimately, you can make it difficult/convoluted to modify system files, but you can't make it impossible unless the computer is DRM-infested from top to bottom -- i.e., a computer outside of the user's control. Because as long as the computer is in the user's control, you guessed it, the computer is in the user's control.

      This is a good thing. It means you actually own the computer you buy, and you have some degree of control over whether it's hijacked and used against you. The disadvantage, however, is that social engineering attacks on you, the owner, are possible.

    2. Re:Chalk one up for Microsoft by mikek3332002 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What happens if Claria decides to pay Microsoft that its a safe product?

    3. Re:Chalk one up for Microsoft by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      "Vista is coming in 2007. Vista is going to have antispyware built directly into the operating system..."

      Am I little paranoid, or is selective spyware scanning a good thing? If MS and Claria are working together, (rumours were that MS was going to buy Claria) and MSAntiSpy isn't blocking it, then what hope for Vista?
      Does this also mean than apart from sanctioned spyware, unsanctioned spyware could be intentionally missed? Who would have that power over MS to do that? The government?

      After all, collecting data about people has strong statistical importance, not just for sales.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    4. Re:Chalk one up for Microsoft by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      The important words in your note are "cash out". The same scumbags who brought us Gator are now part of Microsoft, and as such constitute a legal risk to Microsoft's very deep pockets. So it makes complete sense for all the VP's and stock-bearing staff to cash out immediately and abandon the company to whatever use Microsoft might have for their office space and their customer database management tools.

      There are some other tools and approaches Microsoft might find technically useful from Gator, such as the tendency to insinuate itself into the OS in ways that are incredibly painful to flush. That expertise is deep and expensive to develop, and could be useful to Microsoft development teams that want to weave in things like Windows Media Player, the Microsoft search tools to displace the Google toolbar, etc.

  32. Fear by Hikaru79 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not in their press release, but really their CEO is just afraid he's going to have to box with that crazy Russian guy. ;)

  33. So few here get it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0, Troll
    They are getting out of the ADWARE business. So read it and understand what that means. It means they are staying in the SPYWARE business.

    Guess just showing ads in a program doesn't work anymore. /me looks at the top right corner of his opera browser.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:So few here get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Guess just showing ads in a program doesn't work anymore. /me looks at the top right corner of his opera browser.

      Are you trying to imply that you haven't upgraded in such a long time that your copy of Opera still has ads, or are you implying that Opera also stopped showing ads.

      In either case you're trolling.

  34. I'm not so sure by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    Vista is coming in 2007. Vista is going to have antispyware built directly into the operating system. By 2009, when XP is going to be a minority OS as people's crummy hardware dies

    Your comment seems highly specualtive. Vista hasn't even been released yet. We have no idea whether the antispyware components built into the OS will actually work in real world usage. Plus, 2009 is three years down the road. Even if Vista was a spyware killer, that gives Claria at least three years to make money with their current business model.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:I'm not so sure by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Even if Vista was a spyware killer, that gives Claria at least three years to make money with their current business model.

      If Vista's anti-spyware works anywhere near as well as NanoLimp claims, Claria will have nothing to sell when it comes out. Selling now, while their software's still effective is just good business sense. They'll still have the algorithms, and the know-how, so it it turns out to be a false alarm, they can start coding new programs to do the same thing.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  35. Adware == adware by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The new system will serve up personalized content and advertising to opt-in users."

    In other words, adware... ...which is always (claimed to be) opt-in? Usually in a confusing, most people would feel deceptive way, but at some point in the process you have clicked "yes" on a button, with or without having paid any attention to a complicated notice in obfuscated legalese...

  36. Not safe for work? by phathead296 · · Score: 1

    How about putting a "may not be safe for work" warning on that link? It's borderline, but I'm at work and I don't need the boss seeing me looking at a bunch of busty women, even if they are technically clothed.

    "I swear, I was reading the article!"

  37. its by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alex Stern writes "In an attempt to clean up it's tarnished name, Claria has hired Deutsche
    s/it's/its

  38. I just got a phone call from Hell... by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They said they would like to order one million space heaters. Or one million Intel PCs, whichever is cheaper.

  39. weasel companies must die, not change direction by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and claria aka gator can just freakin' die.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  40. Glasses by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read the summary as this...?

    Claria has hired Douche Bag to help them sell off the software tools that were previously supported by their adware.

    1. Re:Glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No

  41. Still sayin' it... by Down8 · · Score: 1

    I think this is the 3rd of 4th time I'll have said it, and still no law suit:

    Claria is spyware!

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  42. Who the hell do they think they're kidding? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    We didn't fall for the bullshit namechange (that's right, you cocks, we still remember you as "Gator"), what makes them think anyone's going to buy this?

  43. Regarding privacy and supermarket cards... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    Don't use your real name..period. How much longer before single fathers have their supermarket data brought into court by upset mothers seeking retribution. "Obviously your honor he is a bad parent. Look at all the junk food he buys the kids".

    I just signed up for a loyalty card this morning under the name Bucky Fuller. Other cards have names like Igor Stravinsky, Carl Yastremsky and of course John Cocktosen.

    By the way should your cable company or other non-governmental entity need a SSN, use this.
    078-05-1120
    It's a specimen number from the Eisenhower era and works 99% of the time.

    1. Re:Regarding privacy and supermarket cards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loyalty card + credit card = they got'cha. Make sure you pay for all of your purchases in cash if you want to keep your name private.

  44. How to disappear...the whole story by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your inbox is awash in spam, your boss is chuckling over your credit report, and you've got a sneaking suspicion that Uncle Sam counts how many Löwenbräu you chug. Yes, your privacy's shot to hell, and you're tempted to shrug and settle for an open source life. But privacy isn't like virginity, forever lost after the first trespass. With some work, "reprivatization" is possible. Use this three-tiered guide to pick a level of solitude. But be warned: Going all the way off the grid is more Ted Kaczynski than Howard Hughes.

    Going

    Diss credit: Want to be hard to find? Start by dashing off stern opt-out letters to the big database companies and credit bureaus - Experian, Acxiom, Equifax. These folks may make a mint peddling personal info, but they can be cajoled into stopping. First, though, they'll make you jump through hoops - like filling out a 1040-sized form or idling in toll-free hell. Junkbusters (www.junkbusters.com) has a good list of opt-out addresses.

    Anonymize: Ditch your ISP and sign up with a service that lets you surf by proxy, keeping your IP address concealed. Send email via an anonymous remailer like Mixmaster, a digital middleman that scrambles timestamps and message sizes. And if you're going to be advocating the violent overthrow of the government or bragging about your cool new bong, make sure your remailer routes messages through multiple machines.

    Grok the fine print: Boring as it sounds, read the privacy statements that clutter your mailbox around tax time and sever ties with companies that admit, "Our privacy policy may change over time" - industry lingo for "We reserve the right to screw you."

    Going Further

    Ditch the digits:Want to drop out?Start by rustling up a new Social Security number.

    The Social Security Administration doesn't accept paranoia as a criterion for granting a new card, but it recognizes cultural objections and religious pleas. One stratagem: Contend that your credit has been irrevocably damaged by a number-related snafu, or that you live in fear of a stalker who knows your digits. Once you switch your SSN, never use it. Instead, dole out 078-05-1120, an Eisenhower-era card that works 99 percent of the time.

    Call cell-free: Use the humble pay phone. Mobile phones are being outfitted with global positioning satellite chips to comply with an FCC mandate. By 2006, all wireless networks must feature 911-friendly tracking technology. Marketers are cooking up ways to capitalize, like zapping burger coupons to your Nokia as you stroll by a fast-food joint.

    Pay full price: You may relish saving 10 percent on Prell, but deep-six your buyers' club cards. Supermarkets and pharmacies haven't yet perfected the art of data mining, but it won't be long. "If you're having a child custody fight, they could subpoena your frequent-shopper cards and say, 'Look, he's buying too many potato chips, he's hurting the kids,'" says Robert Gellman, a Washington-based privacy consultant.

    Gone

    Move: Want to go completely off the grid? Start by moving - address changes bedevil databasers. But don't buy a home. All those loan apps will blow your cover. Residential hotels smell like cheap cigars and urine, but at least you can register under a pseudonym. Give a fake address: 3500 S. Wacker, Chicago, IL, 60616 - the front door for Comiskey Park.

    Toss your cards:Pay cash for everything, and don't plan on a life of luxury. Any (legal) cash transaction more than $10,000 triggers government reporting regulations, which means you can forget about that Cadillac Escalade you've had your eye on. Settle for the subway or bus, using coins rather than prepaid fare cards, which keep a record of trips.

    Go incognito: Facial-recognition gear will soon be ubiquitous in public spaces. To fool the systems, invest in a pair of bulky aviator sunglasses and a hat. If you fear being tailed, alter your gait every time you hit the street - a pigeon-toed shuffle one day, a bowlegged amble the next. There are also Central American plastic surgery mills, beloved of drug lords, that can alter the loops and whorls on your fingertips. It'll set you back 10 Gs, but then, Costa Rican doctors have been known to accept gold Rolexes in lieu of cash.

    1. Re:How to disappear...the whole story by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      It seemed serious until the end there.

    2. Re:How to disappear...the whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you rat on your Pop, Kaiser Sose will get you.

  45. Vista adoption rate by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    Claria will have nothing to sell when it comes out.

    I wonder how long it will take for Vista to be adopted by the majority of the Windows-using population. According to this article, as of last year at this time, only 40% of corporate users were using Windows XP. It could be several years before Vista reaches the point where even half of the Windows market. According to this graph, about 15% of Windows users still aren't on XP. Of course, the data could be skewed. Still, it makes me think that spyware will be with at least some Windows users (perhaps the least technically-savvy, and therefore least equipped to deal with spyware) for a long time to come.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Vista adoption rate by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      Those figures actually help Vista more than not. Most of these users are going to have to upgrade soon anyway, 2000 is just not viable anymroe in a corporate environment, and if Microsoft times it right a lot of them are going to go straight to Vista.

      Corporate users still on 2000 basically fall into three categories. The cheap, the paranoid, and those locked into supporting legacy products.

      The cheap are usually small businesses who, like home users, will upgrade when they get new PC's. They're not really much of the market anyway.

      The paranoid are sitting on a sinking ship, however much you may fear upgrading 2000 is a sinking ship, it's support is limited, it's features are limited and it's rapidly reaching the point where, corporate wise, it is rapidly becoming unusable. If it doesn't get replaced in time the paranoid will be fired and replaced with people who aren't so paranoid, so thye aren't a problem either. They might not upgrade straight to Vista, but it's going to look appealing as the work is the same.

      The largest category, or at least from my experience the largest category is the people who can't upgrade becaues then stuff won't work, the company I work for is in this category, they don't have the resources to fix the things that need fixing, but even people in this category are going to have to do something soon and again, if you're going to have to go through the cost and expense of redoing systems you may as well do it for Vista as for XP.

    2. Re:Vista adoption rate by Infonaut · · Score: 1

      Those figures actually help Vista more than not.

      Your analysis of the three types of business makes sense to me. In the end, it's not a matter of if, but when people will update. They will already miss the holiday buying season this year, so that may slow first year adoption by consumers.

      I guess time will tell. I think that if Vista's security features make a noticeable difference, and the new OS is as easier or easier to use than Vista, adoption will be pretty good across the board. If either of those two conditions are not met, however, I think they'll have a tougher time getting people to buy it. Also, Vista's hardware requirements may keep people from upgrading until they absolutely have to do so.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    3. Re:Vista adoption rate by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      The delays to Vista are hurting that model. Windows XP has matured and become reasonably stable. Windows 2000 is falling off the support wagon, but with the various anti-virus and anti-spyware tools currently available, the upgrade to Vista cannot be justified by its limited built-ni anti-spyware capabilities.

      Remember, Microsoft is a big believer in letting users activate and install stupid things by just clicking on them. It's a big part of their sales demos, so people are likely to continue to click on "cool screensavers" and other nonsense and rely on their anti-spyware tool to block stuff that is, in fact spyware but which they've just unknowingly authorized for installation. And Microsoft, as a big corporate entity, dare not judge spyware fiercely or they will be facing lawsuits from a bunch of companies that will drain money they don't want to spend.

  46. New business model?!? by clevershark · · Score: 1

    *Claria's new business model is 'a new platform designed to provide consumers with a personalized Internet experience.'*

    Just like a virus Claria's evil will simply mutate into a more, well, virulent and invasive strain which will require new remedies to eradicate. Yay for malware!

    --

    My sig is too lon

  47. What really happens next... by jim_v2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    March 27, 2006, GAIN becomes self aware......

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  48. 'Personalised internet experience' by payndz · · Score: 1

    I find that Firefox and my own set of bookmarks provides exactly that!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  49. The pinstripes make them look reputable like. by twitter · · Score: 1
    So they'll be releasing a tool bar, which will do all of this again and claim other wise?

    They will charge you for it this time! Some people might be fooled into trusting them because they are asking for even more.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  50. Re:I submitted this yesterday by smeenz · · Score: 1

    You obviously didn't introduce enough spelling mistakes, or you failed to include enough spin in the submission.

  51. Hold up a second, here... by griffjon · · Score: 1

    (from the article:)
    Up for sale are the software tools whose free download was supported by the GAIN ad network

    Claria will not be selling the technology or engine that drives the GAIN system, nor the user data affiliated with the GAIN product. The company will also hold onto its digital wallet product, Gator eWallet.

    In April, Claria will unveil major partnerships around this new technology and launch the beta version of PersonalWeb, the first consumer application using this platform.

    The new system will serve up personalized content and advertising to opt-in users. Claria plans on building up its PersonalWeb user base from scratch, and will not be using data from its GAIN system for the new platform.

    I don't see how this exactly is "leaving the adware business" rather than trying to raise some cash by selling off their crappiest current pieces of software that were formerly merely channels for their adware, and then focusing on a new channel for advertising that looks to be built around their eWallet.

    That they're not re-using the GAIN data seems odd, so I wager that there's something left unsaid there.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  52. Re:Yeah. Right. Good luck. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1
    I love it when they bring their machines in the shop with Bonzi Buddy,They always say the same thing(before I can even say "can I help you?")

    "PLEASE tell me you folks can KILL THAT DAMNED LITTLE COMPUTER MONKEY!"I'm just waiting for someone to pull an Elvis and bring one in with bullet holes where he had to kill the monkey.

    You think that a spyware bunch would try to make their "little helper" at least a LITTLE less irritating than a five year old on a sugar high.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  53. you've got it backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're packaging themselves for sale to Microsoft as a missing piece of Windows Live, minus the malware ... and if they have any executives that have a clue about shipping quality software on time, that might interest MS too.

  54. personalized service? by Quadfreak0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can just imagine the options menu. Personalization options Check all that apply: Porn:[ ] Penis Pills:[ ] 419 scams:[ ] Free trip to my homestate:[ ] Ink Refills:[ ] Fake Dating service: [ ] [X]Yes, please dont not share my information with your unrelated affiliate programs.

  55. Tarnished name? Change Name!! by giorgosts · · Score: 1

    The problem whith this name (from their point of view) is not the adware, but the fact that they have been sued for changing other peoples' ads on web pages in favor of their own. They are still going to serve ads, but from a fresh (not so aggresive) approach..

  56. Nine out of 10 lobbyists recommend eClaria by drivekiller · · Score: 1

    [new age music, pastel colors, amorphous shapes]
    [voice over]
    "Strong medicine for stuffy nose, carpal tunnel and chronic depression."
    [music]
    "Ask you doctor about eClaria-- "
    [assorted disclaimers]
    [fade]

  57. Ever hear of "rewards cards" by drivekiller · · Score: 1

    The retailers don't need to follow customers around to see what food, books, electronic gear, etc., they buy; they just offer a discount for "joining". Not much different from some of the come-ons that convince naive users to install spyware, actually.

  58. Anyone actually believe this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want to provide users with a "personalized" (as in targetted ads) web experience. They've gone through this song and dance before -- changed their name to try to escape their past and claim they've turned over a new leaf. "Wolf Wolf!"

  59. Sounds like.... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    "eClaria" sounds like something one would catch off a toilet seat or by eating tainted egg rolls.

    "I got a bad case of eClaria so missed work and ruined a pair of underwear."