Slashdot Mirror


Facebook On The Block

conq writes "BusinessWeek reports that Facebook has turned down an offer for $750 million and is looking for 2 billion dollars. The article speculates that one possible suitor would be Viacom. From the article: 'A Facebook deal would help Viacom founder and Executive Chairman Sumner Redstone fend off a growing challenge from News Corp. The media conglomerate run by Rupert Murdoch has poured enormous resources into the Internet during the last year. It acquired social-networking pioneer MySpace.com last year for $580 million.'"

201 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. oh brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i read garbage like this and think we're headed for yet another intenet fall. myspace? facebook? do we hontestly expect these fads to drive an economy? the web is 21st century snake oil.

    1. Re:oh brother by jcnnghm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You obviously aren't in college. Facebook is a marketers wet dream. One of the hardest demographics to reach hits that site literally 20 times a day. And that includes everyone, especially the trend setting popular kids (who are often the most addicted).

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:oh brother by Jahz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Before you are so quick to judge, try and look at it from a bussiness point of view. For a multi-national conglomerate, sites like Facebook are invaluable. Consider that hundreds of thousands (millions?) of America's college-age youth have volunterally registered themselves (and their entire social network) on this site. They've itemized everything they like, and everything they hate, and matched it with detailed geographic and demographic information.

      A quick glance at the constantly updated Facebook stats page showed me that the top 5 television shows "watched" by college students are Family Guy, Grey's Anatomy, Friends, The OC, Simpsons, respectively. At my school the list differs on on Friends, which is replaced by Fox's 24. If I had to make a list of the shows my friends here watched on a regular basis, it would pretty much be the same. How much does Nielsen make from providing such information??

      I used Television as an example, but Facebook collects stats on many other things, such as popular movies, music and more. All of these stats are specific to the campus level, i.e. a very small geographic area. Even more, you could even tell what high school/hometown each student is from, when they were born, if they are single, male or female, etc etc.

      My Point: 2 Billion is very high, but don't underrate the value that this site could provide to a (multi)national marketing team.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    3. Re:oh brother by Pax00 · · Score: 1

      Another thing to keep in mind with myspace atleast is the fact that it allows bands to post their contact info, tour dates, and song samples. being in a band and setting up shows for bars, I have found this is a great tool.. I don't think myspace is going to bubble out...

    4. Re:oh brother by neersign · · Score: 2, Interesting
      especially the trend setting popular kids (who are often the most addicted)

      this is because they are the only ones who care who has more friends than them. Personally, i think myspace and thefacebook (and stretching it more to deviantart) have potential in theory to be great websites to allow friends to find long lost friends, share ideas, and find new friends, but in actuality they become popularity contests.

      and yes, i have accounts on both myspace and thefacebook.

    5. Re:oh brother by wrenhunter · · Score: 1
      One of the hardest demographics to reach
      What? In college, you watch TV (with ads), surf the web (ditto), see movies (with product placements), play games (ditto), and listen to music (some of which succeeds by rhyming with brand names). In college, all you DO is consume media -- while wasted, I might add, all the better to receive the ads uncritically.

      You, my friend, are the marketer's wet dream!

    6. Re:oh brother by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      It's not an internet fad. It's a website where students can socalize. I wish it were available when I was in college. Oh wait i'm in college again!!! Lol, I'm like the oldest damn person on facebook! I constantly email them how I can fix the problems they've got. For $750 Million that site should be a hell of a lot more robust than it is. Only MySpace seems to be on worse servers. MySpace is open to everyone. Facebook locks it to your own school. Clever security feature in my opinion. Not the best but keeps some weirdos out (like me ;)

      Tschüs

    7. Re:oh brother by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      That's nothing compared to the Billions AT&T poured into Excite@Home, 2.9 on the top for Comcast shares, and another 300 million for upgrades in the first 3 months. The billions that flowed from Excite@Home for their "wall of aquisitions" makes accounting from Enron look like grade school math afterwards.

      If you look at the billions spent on advertising by any large business (even a modest account like Apple puts 250 million a quarter into it) an aqusition like this can be meaningful - if they can translate it into something they can use.

      Unlike say - Flickr - which is still giving Yahoo fits.

      What's Web 2.0? 3 years of back-capital being dumped at the same time from Sandhill Road.

      At least the IPO frenzy hasn't started yet - that's when the real hurt starts. Joe Blow sinking the trust fund into http://blahoo.com/what_the_fuck_are_we_doing.htm

      BTW / Disclaimer - how do I turn off slashdot's automatic link-creation of an obvious joke?
      IOW: Don't click on it - it could be gay porn from Pakistan for all I know.

    8. Re:oh brother by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Which explains why there hundreds of companies bidding for adds on facebook. Oh, wait, there are essentially none. Their advertising model is currently targetted at student groups, as an alternative to flyering campus. Its almost DESIGNED for failure.

    9. Re:oh brother by jcnnghm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somebody must see at least three quarters of a billion dollars worth of oppurtunity there. They're buying an audience, not a website.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    10. Re:oh brother by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      While the other people responding to your post do raise some interesting points, I'm inclined to agree that the value of facebook seems inflated by its rapid rise. It sprung up faster than any competition, except MySpace in a slightly different form, could follow. I dare say it succeeded because it focused on its target group well, and it added features based on demand. In comparison, my impression is that other social networking sites that were developing at about the same time as facebook did not have clear target demographics (the school represents a very convenient market for this sort of thing), and they added features rather than users. Also, facebook was not really started as a revenue making site, so ads entered in as an accessory, rather than the main purpose of the site. I see lots of sites that exist to generate revenue first and provide content second, and lots that are the opposite. I know which give me a more satisfactory visit. I'm drifting away from my original point, but what I meant to say is that being the first does not guarantee they will always be the top.

      On the flipside, it can be hard to compete directly with facebook. There's another site called yearbook.com. Genuine ripoff of facebook and myspace combined. Nobody bothers with it because it doesn't really offer anything the other two don't, and all their friends already use the other two. It's sort like instant messengers. Not too many people use Jabber. Everyone uses the one their friends use. Dang these college kids and their really good but simple ideas. I bet I could handle a project like facebook, but of course, now its a tougher market, and I never thought of it anyways. "$750 million? No thank you my good sir. We can discuss this again when you're prepared to make a serious offer </british accent>

    11. Re:oh brother by blaksaga · · Score: 1

      This is what I always hated about myspace. Facebook, on the other hand, has been a great tool to contact old friends that I would have probably forgotten about by now. And on top of that, I am in a facebook group for my place of employment where I have met coworkers in various other departments. While my experience with myspace has led me to think that it's nothing more than a virtual pissing contest, facebook has wound up being a very valuable social tool.

    12. Re:oh brother by sentanta · · Score: 1

      But the problem with these sites is that there is no long-term way to guarantee their popularity. Look at Friendster- it had an exponential growth rate until MySpace hit the scene. Since then it has been slowly losing visitors. Any remember amIhotornot.com? And I read an article somewhere about a backlash at MySpace over some of the new concerns the community had about the site's new corporate ownership. What is to prevent the same thing happening at Facebook if Viacom does something the users don't agree with. Remember - if someone pays $2bn, they're gonna want to squeeze $2b out of the users somehow. I don't expect the new owner to put the users ahead of $$$$.

      --
      The Big Yuan - tracking mainland China
    13. Re:oh brother by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      True but this is the age group marketing people love. So how much do people pay for x Millions of viewers for a 30 second ad during the superbowl. This is 10's of Millions of daily page views. If it truly is the #7 most visited site, it's worth it in the ad sense alone.

  2. Drunk idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Make site where dumbasses post pictures of themselves drunk and create atrocious "web pages" to showcase said pictures
    2. ???
    3. Profit!
    1. Re:Drunk idiots by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      1. Make site where dumbasses post pictures of themselves drunk and create atrocious "web pages" to showcase said pictures

      You don't "create" web pages on Facebook. The interface is standardized.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    2. Re:Drunk idiots by G)-(ostly · · Score: 1

      Oh, but then how will Facebook match innovative MySpace features such as the ability to crash your computer remotely, or get your fired when you load a profile with an embedded porn clip?

      Sites like this are created for imbeciles, visited by imbeciles, and desired by people who's main market is imbeciles. This entire ridiculous fad reminds of the day AOL gave all its 12 year old users access to Usenet X(

    3. Re:Drunk idiots by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Until the average American is nolonger an idiot*, and median income remains high in the US. There will always be great value associated with any tool that eases the separation of a fool from his money.


      *Recall the quip, no one ever went broke underestimating the average American's inteligence.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:Drunk idiots by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      The story is about Facebook, not Myspace. You appear to be a little confused as to the difference. Have you ever used Facebook?

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    5. Re:Drunk idiots by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      theres a difference?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    6. Re:Drunk idiots by G)-(ostly · · Score: 1

      MySpace: A social networking site for 12 year olds with digital cameras and a few hours between the time they get home from school and the time their parents get home from work.

      Facebook: A social networking site for the MySpace users who managed to get into college.

    7. Re:Drunk idiots by blueflash2o · · Score: 1
      Facebook: A social networking site for the MySpace users who managed to get into college.
      facebook also has a high school site but you can't search the high school one from the college one.
  3. Most investors can't register by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't go to school, can't register on the Facebook. Bummer.

    1. Re:Most investors can't register by vishbar · · Score: 1

      ALL of my friends are registered on facebook. I cannot think of a single college student that isn't.

      --
      Ride the skies
    2. Re:Most investors can't register by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      College students who aren't issued an e-mail address by the school...

  4. Why? by djdanlib · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do the Facebook people feel the need to sell their company? Come on, just keep running Facebook the way it is. It doesn't need to be sold.

    Remember what happened when they sold mp3.com? It died a horrible death. If that happens to Facebook... a lot more people will be upset.

    1. Re:Why? by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, for starters there's this neat thing called money...

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Why? by avalys · · Score: 1

      Because they stand to make something on the order of one billion dollars?

      I mean, how freaking interesting can running that site be? I'd be happy to dump it and get on to something more worthwhile.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Why? by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do they need to sell it? Because if they do they can retire to their own private island instead of managing a cheesy yet inexplicably hugely popular website?

      Facebook is a cheesy unoriginal idea that became a huge fad, and these guys can reap a huge financial windfall for it. They would be fools not to sell.

    4. Re:Why? by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      How could it possibly become any more useless? It's one thing to waste hours on a website, but that site is absolutely pointless.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    5. Re:Why? by popeguilty · · Score: 5, Funny

      Run a website full of idiot college students or live in unimaginable luxury... decisions, decisions...

    6. Re:Why? by LuminaireX · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part where they said they were seeking 2 billion dollars? Call them sellouts if you'd like, but you'd do the same thing if someone offered you 2 billion for one of your school projects.

    7. Re:Why? by abandonnship · · Score: 1

      I think Facebook is popular enough that it won't die out even if it's sold. Money makes the world go 'round, baby. If I had something as successful as Facebook and was offered that much money, I'd probably sell out too, whether or not a bunch of college kids cared. *goes to update Facebook profile*

    8. Re:Why? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      And the people who sold it became filthy stinking rich.

      What would you rather do: Work on a site that's populated by ego-ridden teens and young college students who whine a lot and make some money off of adverts and sponsorships, or get a (very) large suitcase full of money and go do drugs off a hooker's ass in Vegas?

      If you're still thinking about this, just ask yourself: What Would Bender Do?

    9. Re:Why? by BewireNomali · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think why facebook s interesting is because it's self renewing. The difference with other social sites is that they quickly die the death most fads do.

      Facebook is constantly renewing itself - with a new "class" as students leave and students come in.

      So in my estimation, facebook is more valuable than Myspace because facebook has constant and consistent and probably measurable influx of new people. If they can permanently tie facebook to the college experience, then facebook becomes a very valuable long term commodity, because advertisers and content providers can target the entire college age audience at once. That would be huge.

      also, from a financial standpoint, college students are even more valuable than high school students, as they all will be wielding credit cards for the first time, meaning they've just acquired their power to spend beyond their means. All my college friends incurred serious debt in college - in fact most of their debt was acquired in school. So advertising to this "new money" as it were, is very important.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    10. Re:Why? by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      At the same time, the population of Facebook is also expiring. The people who are finishing college may stay on, but they probably won't bother to check as often, so they'll gradually stop coming and looking at ads. The people who are on Myspace might stay on for an indefinite amount of time, and they can always bring anyone in.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    11. Re:Why? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      What does facebook do that it could possibly be worth $750 million dollard (or worse yet, the $2B they think they're worth)?

      Usually people buy companies to make more money for themselves. How could Facebook possibly generate enough renevue to reasonably pay off the initial investment?

    12. Re:Why? by SgtPepperKSU · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "At the same time, the population of Facebook is also expiring."
      That's a good thing! That way advertisers are pretty much guaranteed that their audience will be of a particular demographic - current students.
      You don't have that kind of assurance at myspace.

    13. Re:Why? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      exactly my point. the demo will always be current students. that "renewable" factor ensures that facebook is around long after myspace is a memory.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    14. Re:Why? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What does facebook do that it could possibly be worth $750 million dollard (or worse yet, the $2B they think they're worth)?

      • An Established Brand, this alone takes a ton of cash and time to build up. It is worth purchasing as a whole.
      • A Goldmine of demographic data that can be sold to marketers and shared with the purchasing company's other divisions.
      • A captured, self renewing marketplace for advertising, word of mouth campaign launches, and buzz marketing initalization
    15. Re:Why? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      They have a pipe into the mindspace of nearly every college student in the US for starters. Huge demographic and it is starting to get to the point where the average college student spends more time on facebook than watching TV. It is also a viral thing like IM networks and online auction sites: their features can be copied and even surpassed, but without an installed base they are squat. The only worry of being toppled they have is that microsoft includes a crappy facebook workalike in explorer.exe. It actually isn't that far of a stretch.
       
      Facebook's most ingenious contribution was verifying its users by checking for specific .edu email addresses. Every other social network out there is full of fake people and random trash. This is very minimal on facebook.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    16. Re:Why? by drauh · · Score: 1

      > Facebook is constantly renewing itself - with a new "class" as students leave and students come in.
      > ...
      > So in my estimation, facebook is more valuable than Myspace because facebook has constant and consistent and probably measurable influx of new people.

      Sure, but one could see that as limiting the population from which you draw new members. Will all of the new class join? What proportion will? And by what mechanism are they introduced to Facebook? Also, alumni can maintain their membership when they graduate. If anything, dropping people once they leave school is not a great thing for the user because the social network that you built up is suddenly gone.

      I don't see why this makes Facebook "more valuable" than Myspace. There is already a population of pre-college students on Myspace who will continue being active on Myspace, and who will bring their new college friends to it once they enter college.

      --
      This is a tautology.
    17. Re:Why? by dema · · Score: 1

      All my college friends incurred serious debt in college - in fact most of their debt was acquired in school.

      You ended this sentence a little early: All my college friends incurred serious debt in college - in fact most of their debt was acquired in school tuition and outfuckingrageous fees.

      (:

    18. Re:Why? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      That's why I said something about tying facebook to the college experience. if they can make facebook synonymous to the college experience, then they can ensure consistent uptake. It's fine if alumni stay on, but the bread and butter are the students themselves. That critical mass. Another poster made a good point about the exchange going both ways, advertisers feedthem junk and at the same time know what they're up to - what they like, etc.

      It is limiting the population. But you're thinking small. What happens if you can soon target every college going person? Nationally? Internationally? And you're just thinking about advertising. What about content delivery? Information mining?

      Targeted advertising is what the web promises and can deliver well. In order to target, artificial limits have to be placed - this isn't a bad one as far as those things go.

      Myspace will be replaced by another social site that becomes trendy. It's the way of trends. But facebook is uniquely placed and NAMED to last - in part because they've placed artificial filters around their product to modulate growth. Thus the growth isn't as explosive, but consistent.... like a business.

      myspace will reach a zenith, then most will migrate to another site. myspace isn't new - many like it haveexisted before and existed after. Facebook is uniquely positioned to last, in my estimation, if they play their cards right. And that has value.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    19. Re:Why? by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      An Established Brand, this alone takes a ton of cash and time to build up.

      This is obviously untrue, as Facebook managed to do it with almost no money, and they've only been around for a couple of years.

      --
      fuck you.
    20. Re:Why? by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      This so sounds like something that fell through a wormhole from 1999. Buzz marketing, brand, users... Sure these things are worth a lot, but two billion dollars? Not unless you've got revenues and a business model. Do they have this?

      I couldn't find out; I tried looking on the website. All I could get off their website was "Mark Zuckerberg- Founder. Dustin Moskovitz- Keeper. Chris Hughes- Empath." Great. What the $#&* is an empath and how the hell does it contribute to the bottom line? Does he get in touch with his feelings to make business decisions... like, "Mark... I'm getting some very wistful readings on our fourth-quarter profits, some ennui about our attempts to sell demographic data... but advertising revenues for 2007 feel joyful, even ecstatic. My feelings warn me against a merger... but that could also be a bit of food poisoning from the Chinese buffet last night."

      Maybe these guys really are the Next Big Thing. But it sounds like a heck of a lot of hype and users without a clear model for turning a profit. And we've seen that before; most of those companies crashed and burned.

    21. Re:Why? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      This is the 21st century. As soon as something cooler shows up, people'll move to that. Facebook is a great idea, but it only has certain functions. There are things I want to do but I can only do on friendster, or other social sites. It has clubs, and social maps, and whatnot, but it is also not very customizable, and sometimes hard to search for new friends. Look for something similar but with more functions and social dynamic to take it's place in a few years, or perhaps watch Facebook change dramatically.

      Though perhaps buying up add the fads and mashing them together is the plan here.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    22. Re:Why? by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      Yes, but no one makes you register during freshman orientation. It can be easily replaced, even with such a big mindshare.

    23. Re:Why? by jackbird · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...but isn't the number of kids turning 12 and signing up for myspace roughly similar to the number of kids entering college and signing up for facebook?

    24. Re:Why? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      When there is no one in the marketspace it takes nothing. When there is someone to dethrone you have to cough up the cash.

    25. Re:Why? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      My point is that it's possible that in six months, those kids turning 12 will no longer think myspace is cool and therefore sign up with another service.

      with careful positioning, facebook can maintain its position as college-aged social networking portal and last for a while. That's my point. It's positioned itself uniquely to transcend trend-dom and become something people naturally do.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    26. Re:Why? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      The thing that they have that other overhyped sites don't is a consistent demographic. When the users outgrow this service, they are replaced by new ones in the target, and highly coveted, demographic.

      I think it's a combination of the demographic and the possible marketing services that is causing them to inflate their asking price. The business model is pretty clear, captured demographics to market too and demographic information for sale. It would be a pretty stupid move to advertise this on the user facing site.

    27. Re:Why? by jackbird · · Score: 1

      I don't really see how facebook isn't vulnerable to exactly the same thing.

    28. Re:Why? by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      I'm rather happy Facebook is of very limited customizability. Ever tried to read text on a bloody animated gif or green text on red background, or really any image whatsoever, as a background, like several people I've seen on myspace do? I'll take the white-blue color scheme of facebook, thanks. At least I can read it.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    29. Re:Why? by Janus67 · · Score: 1

      1) It is always renewing by college students. College students have the availablility of a much larger amount of money that is burning in their pockets (credit cards, steady jobs making 8+ dollars an hour, etc). 12 year olds generally only get money from their parents or some sorry excuse for an "allowance". Having control of basically a large amount of the college population, and having it renew over long periods of time with new classes, and figure that 20% of the graduating classes come back each year after they graduated it is still a very large market share.

    30. Re:Why? by c_forq · · Score: 1

      As a college student I can really see his point. When I moved onto campus the first thing that changed was switching to AIM as my primary messanger (my hometown used MSN, but EVERYONE on campus used AIM, but this wasn't a big deal since I use Trillian). A bit into my Freshman year I joined facebook, it was new and not many people on it now. Now EVERYONE is facebook. It has become more common to have someone look you up or ask to be looked up instead of getting/giving a number or an e-mail address to arrange meetings or a date, you will have people say "Just facebook me" all the time around campus. This isn't nearly as much as a fad as it is being made out to be here, this is a tool. It's an extremely useful school directory, while at the same time a popularity game.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    31. Re:Why? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      that credit card thing to me is a huge point. credit cards are thrown at students and most pick up at least one. this means they can spend beyond their means. this is huge to advertisers and credit card companies, and the country as a whole, as a huge method of control for the populace is personal debt.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    32. Re:Why? by dr.g · · Score: 1

      Huh? It's a demographic that moves on AS SOON AS IT IS A FEW YEARS AWAY FROM MAKING REAL MONEY.

      And, as was pointed out, the demographic remains stable, as those people are replaced BY OTHER POOR COLLEGE KIDS. Jebus. Only a marketroid would think a bit o' jargon and some buzzwords ("branding" "targeted demographic" "viral marketing" "word of mouth campaign launches" "buzz") will make people forget the whole overhyped 'net bubble of the late 90s.

      Or maybe that doesn't even matter. The marketroids always get their piece of the pie before anyone is really sure there is going to BE a pie, don't they? What else CAN they say?

      To believe News Corp is going to get anything near $2b in ACTUAL REVENUES from this is another sad demonstration of insufficient cynicism, methinks.

      --
      "To be fair, I was left completely unsupervised." ~Anon
    33. Re:Why? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      AS SOON AS IT IS A FEW YEARS AWAY FROM MAKING REAL MONEY.

      True, but Budweiser and Miller Lite love em all the same.

      Only a marketroid would think a bit o' jargon and some buzzwords ("branding" "targeted demographic" "viral marketing" "word of mouth campaign launches" "buzz") will make people forget the whole overhyped 'net bubble of the late 90s.

      You would think so, but people never learn from their mistakes.

      To believe News Corp is going to get anything near $2b in ACTUAL REVENUES from this is another sad demonstration of insufficient cynicism, methinks.

      I couldn't agree more. Yet it is nearly impossible to measure the worth of affecting brand loyalty to a demographic that is about to start raking in some cash.

    34. Re:Why? by gordgekko · · Score: 1
      All my college friends incurred serious debt in college - in fact most of their debt was acquired in school.


      I guess none of your friends bought houses and cars. My home was easily several multiples of my tuition and fees and I live on Baltic Avenue, not Park Place.
      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  5. The new business model. by vertinox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know... I've seriously thought about this myself. I just have to figure out how to make a site that generates a lot of hits with no real income and then sell it off to the highest bidder.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:The new business model. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know... I've seriously thought about this myself. I just have to figure out how to make a site that generates a lot of hits with no real income and then sell it off to the highest bidder.

      Then party like it's 1999... :-)

    2. Re:The new business model. by Tweekster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually it has a lot of income....it is called relevant advertising. That is why if you put your favorite movie as fight club, a poster store (and ad) for fight club posters will show up. If all websites had that sort of advertising people wouldnt be so annoyed by banner ads.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    3. Re:The new business model. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      No real income? What makes you think that?

      Facebook doesn't release revneue figures, but as recently as Apr'05 they were valued at around $100mil, which tells me that they have significant revenues.

      Facebook generates revenue from banner ads, local sponsored links, and sponsored groups. Considering that 85% of the college population (which, BTW, is a very sought-after demographic) uses Facebook, I'd say their ad revenues could be extremely significant.

      2 bn is probably excessive, I wouldn't be able to tell without seeing their P&L, or at least revenue figures.

      "I just have to figure out how to make a site that generates a lot of hits with no real income and then sell it off to the highest bidder."

      If you're generating a lot of hits and aren't scoring a lot of ad revenue, then you need to hire someone who knows what they are doing in selling ad space. Hits = revenue, expecially when the hits are coming from college kids.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:The new business model. by coldtone · · Score: 1
    5. Re:The new business model. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      OMG, that is brilliant. Why haven't more people thought of that?

      Oh, right. Everyone did.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:The new business model. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      they were valued at around $100mil, which tells me that they have significant revenues.

      What, like Infospace, which at its peak was valued at $31bil, but which was really worth... hrm... how do I put this... "fuck all". A valuation is worthless without, as you say, P&L, revenue, and more.

  6. The internet bubble is back in force! by mcguyver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure, its' alexa ranking is 62 but $2 billion for a site created two years ago? WOW! You would think a billion worth of investment into engineering and marketing could easily recreate facebook.

    1. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Recreate the functions that run facebook? Yes.

      Recreate the following and population behind the site? Not likely.

    2. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by popeguilty · · Score: 1

      It isn't about functionality, it's about mindshare. Anyone could slap together a PHP or MySQL app to replace Facebook in a few weeks, but replicating the idea that The Facebook is where you go to post pics of yourself, catch up with friends, and schedule the party for this weekend? Anyone would kill for that sort of mindshare.

    3. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by miracle · · Score: 1

      Are you nuts?

      Marketing is such a fuzzy, oblique concept. You can't just pour money into a product and guarantee success.

      The reality is that facebook.com, myspace.com, flickr.com, and kingwoodyardsales.com all grew because friends brought their friends. You can't pay money for that. It's not for sale. Even bribing people to bring their friends doesn't work like the genuine real deal.

      If it were that easy, the internet would be a whole different game.

    4. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by gnovos · · Score: 1

      Recreate the following and population behind the site? Not likely.

      Yeah, because all THAT takes is two years and a web-based IRC. Come on people, teenagers are notorious for following the "fads". Come up with your own "super facebook, now with more Xtremeness" and watch them all flock in.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    5. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      mindshare

      BINGO!!!!

    6. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and with enough money you can make the new ebay! No. Not unless ebay seriously fucks up. (Ok I admit it, if you managed to get enough money to pay users to post their auctions on your site and could keep it up for a solid year, you would be able to replace ebay. Good luck dealing with all the scammers on that deal though.)

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    7. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by comp.sci · · Score: 1

      They can sell if for such a price not because of the "technology" underlying it (which is not too complicated) but because of its user base! Private data on almost every college/high-school student in the country + being able to generate specific ads, catered to the interests of people!
      Do you really think that the myspace technology is that advanced that you'd shell out that much money for it?
      Again, its all about getting the hip new project that people love and use!

    8. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      That's "Super Facebook, now with more Xtremeness and Nacho Ranch Emo Mashups".

      That and a commercial on Adult Swim should do the trick.

    9. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by preppypoof · · Score: 1

      They would not be paying $2 billion for just the technology. As has already been stated, the technology isn't worth that. But if they spent $1 billion on creating a site just like facebook, do you really think that everyone that already has a facebook will want to go get an account on this new site? They want to buy facebook because of all of the people that are already signed up, and for all of the people that will inevitably sign up.

    10. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by SnapShot · · Score: 1
      Recreate the following and population behind the site? Not likely.


      Two billion dollars is a lot of money. How about this:

              $1,000,000 to recreate the facebook code
              $1,000,000 for servers, power, office space, and donuts in the break room
      $1,000,000,000 for advertising, kickbacks to colleges, and outright bribes for customers

      You'd still save a billion dollars.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    11. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. Being able to achieve the same popular as Facebook itself is a big gamble, and it will take a while for the investment to pay off. On the other hand, if you pay twice as much now, you get the revenue stream immediately, and you get the user base immediately.

      --
      -mkb
    12. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by kenwood720 · · Score: 1

      Sure, you could recreate Facebook, but then you would need to find a way to attract users all over again. What good would the technology be without the userbase and name?

    13. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by Janus67 · · Score: 1

      There are many things about Facebook that are awkward from a Canadian perspective (for example the 'how do you know this person dialog'). I don't understand how that is awkward or confusing. It is simply saying, how do you know this person? (through school, a friend, working together, a sport, a club, high school, a party)... it is pretty self explainatory.

    14. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by nostrademons · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Pay every FaceBook user $100 to switch to TheMoneyBook.com. For $100, I'd do it, and I bet I'd have no problem convincing my friends to follow me, particularly if they also got $100 for it. Total cost: $500 million, less than TheFaceBook.com has already been offered. People are idiots.

    15. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by Rachel+Lucid · · Score: 1

      Unlike every other social networking site though, Facebook has (thinly veiled yet easily controlled) privacy, user-controlled networks, easily filterable and relevant dissemination of data (like events) AND a relevant connection to each and every user(knowing that virtually everyone you contact shares the same college as you, something that Myspace can't verify worth a damn), Facebook is worth its weight in gold to the average student. And, unlike Myspace, Facebook isn't mired in sex scandals and dirtiness. Yet.

    16. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by DoctorBit · · Score: 1

      I've never used facebook, but on the face of it (so to speak) it seems to me that facebook does not have a natural monopoly like ebay does and microsoft does. That's because facebook is restricted to college students, a population that renews in big chunks every September. Suppose that the incoming class of freshmen all used "xyz.com" in high school and want to stay connected with their old friends (some of whom might not have gone on to college, or gone to different schools). While facebook might have a natural monopoly in the sophmore class, facebook has to create a new critical mass of freshmen members at every school, every year. I suppose that freshmen who want to be on the same site as their elder classmates might show some loyalty to the site, but they also might want to rebel by affiliating with a separate freshman site. That would make it easy for a competitor to jump in and snatch the critcal mass of incoming students to create a new monopoly. I think even $750 million is a crazy offer for what could turn out to be a four-year monopoly.

    17. Re:The internet bubble is back in force! by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      They've turned it into an 8 year monopoly, as they now allow high school and college students. One of the appeals of facebook is that it is only students. There is some comfort with the idea that its only people in your age group. While yes, I see your point, I think that facebook does have the college monopoly and that it can be very self perpetuating.

      I think you'll see very much, freshman sticking with the old system to try and connect with the older students.

  7. Add to Friends by christopherfinke · · Score: 4, Funny

    That may sound like a huge amount of money, especially when you consider that the company was launched just two years ago by a group of sophomores at Harvard University, led by Mark Zuckerberg

    Hmmm...

    / Adds Mark Zuckerberg to his friends.

    1. Re:Add to Friends by bk4u · · Score: 1
      / Adds Mark Zuckerberg to his friends.

      How do you know Mark Zuckerberg?

      [ ] Lived together

      [ ] Worked together

      [ ] From an organization or team

      [ ] Took a course together

      [ ] From a summer / study abroad program

      [ ] Went to school together

      [ ] Traveled together

      [ ] In my family

      [ ] Through a friend

      [ ] Through facebook

      [ ] Met randomly

      [ ] We hooked up

      [ ] We dated

      [ ] I don't even know this person

      --
      Remember kids, with great power comes great opportunity to abuse that power
  8. 2 billion? by Jrod5000+at+RPI · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know how they arrived at a 2 billion dollar asking price. That's probably the craziest valuation since google's IPO.

    1. Re:2 billion? by HarvardAce · · Score: 1
      I'd like to know how they arrived at a 2 billion dollar asking price. That's probably the craziest valuation since google's IPO.

      So since GOOG is now trading approximately 4x their IPO price (~$375 as opposed to an IPO of $85 per share), you're saying that facebook should be worth actually around 8 billion dollars? Or are you saying that the facebook value of 2 billion is as crazy high as GOOG's at IPO was crazy low?

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    2. Re:2 billion? by johncadengo · · Score: 1

      How did they arrive at 2 billion?

      Easy. There's two of them. They each want to be billionaires, and on that Fortune list of 750 Richest Americans or whatever. $750 Million, split in two, isn't as nice as an instant spot on the world's Billionaire list (a very exclusive list, indeed). They want to be the next Larry Page and Sergey Brin, although I don't think Facebook is nearly as neat idea as Google...

      --
      My page.
  9. go ahead, inflate that bubble again by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 4, Insightful
    with such insane amounts of money pouring into overhyped dotcoms again, I can see the next crash coming... show me the myspace.com business model please - I mean, I'm all for sites driven by user-generated content (it works for slashdot and many others), but such large investments should have at least a tiny chance of being made back eventually (i.e. in the next 10 years or so) ;-)

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    1. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Facebook has a captive audience that is in a consistent demographic and has all of the users verified as real human beings. Or close enough to that. This means that advertisers can make very focused advertising campaigns to a large group of people in the ever so popular 18-24 demographic.

    2. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Ok chicken little, the sky is still up where it's supposed to be. Do your understand the difference between what's occuring today and what occured six years ago?

      Viacom is a huge company, as is Rupert Murdock's news company; seven hundred fifty million is not nearly as much money to Viacom as one might think. These are niche websites that DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN ENTIRE INDUSTRY.

      The point of the investment is for market infiltration; Viacom is going "Oh shit, Murdock is kicking our ass on the internet we need to get involved" thus they are trying to buy things up like they are the New York Yankees. This is the same thing as when Microsoft takes a hit on the Xboxs...market infiltration you'll recoup your money from existing areas.

      Get off the soap box.

    3. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Google. It's not like money can be made from ads.

      I believe the last stats I read had MySpace user registration doubling every six months. They are rated number 8 on Alexa, only behind companies like Google, Yahoo, MSN and eBay.

      Perhaps the apparent business model of a social networking site isn't immediately obvious. That is, until, you think about what a media conglomerate like News Corp can do with such an active community. News Corp has holdings like Fox News and primetime shows like American Idol. You can bet that they will leverage their MySpace internet real-estate to push users towards their old media offerings. That, in itself, will generate a lot of revenue.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    4. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1
      Tell that to Google. It's not like money can be made from ads.

      Google has a unique standing - almost a monopoly in the search engine market, which is (arguably) the only online market next to pure e-commerce enabling sites where advertising actually works to some extent. Also, they get almost everything right (no annoying Flash ads etc.).

      That is, until, you think about what a media conglomerate like News Corp can do with such an active community. News Corp has holdings like Fox News and primetime shows like American Idol. You can bet that they will leverage their MySpace internet real-estate to push users towards their old media offerings. That, in itself, will generate a lot of revenue.

      This is what they may think that it may do, but it's far from certain that it will. The community may be completely resistant to efforts to push Fox content down their throats, especially if it messes up the myspace.com experience (which seems to revolve about music, fandom and ugly beeping personal webspace). Others have tried to "leverage" their freshly bought online properties (you know, back in 2000, where the number of registered users were as good as a hard currency) and failed (Bertelsmann's brief adventures with AOL Europe spring to mind). But hey, at least the ideas you described will serve to keep the stock holders happy ;-)

      --
      "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    5. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1
      Do your understand the difference between what's occuring today and what occured six years ago?

      This is the same thing as when Microsoft takes a hit on the Xboxs...market infiltration you'll recoup your money from existing areas.

      Well, at least the crappy analogies some people come up with have stayed the same. Microsoft has grabbed a huge chunk out of a very limited market there and they actually sell something to their "users". How does that compare to a small chunk of the infinitely extensible web, where all you can hope for is to influence your users through advertising (does anyone still believe in compulsory subscriptions for such web sites?)?

      Now, show me the business model please. I'm easy to convince with facts, but largely resistant to obscure beliefs. I heard all that "we'll make money from ads" stuff before a few years ago, so it's not very convincing either, even though the cost side of such projects looks much better these days.

      --
      "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    6. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1
      Facebook has a captive audience that is in a consistent demographic and has all of the users verified as real human beings. Or close enough to that.

      Certainly true, I agree.

      This means that advertisers can make very focused advertising campaigns to a large group of people in the ever so popular 18-24 demographic.

      Alright, so where is that revenue now? What's keeping them from fully realizing this potential? They'd better have an EBIT of $50mil+ if they expect to be valued at $2b by a rich fool ;-)

      --
      "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    7. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by CFTM · · Score: 1

      I wasn't attempting to say that what Viacom is attempting to do was intelligent nor was I saying that I agreed with Murdock's decision to buy MySpace. My point was that this is not indicative of a bubble bursting, when the internet stock bubble burst it was for the reasons you mentioned; Viacom has a business model and so does News Corp, and these acquisitions are merely a piece of that business model.

      Sometimes money has to be spent in order to just do business, and Viacom may feel that this is one of those situations. Here's an example, my old man is a partner with a large consulting firm who does work with major oil companies. These oil companies have huge deposits in Russia so they HAVE to do business in Russia even though they operate at a loss in Russia. The clients are too big to just walk away from it. I realize that the situations are vastly different but my point was that these acquisitions are more about the price to play ball than existing on a concrete business model. Moreover, Facebook is just being greedy with their 2 billion dollar price tag; anyone with brain knows its not worth it.

    8. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      show me the myspace.com business model please

      Gather lots of eyeballs from the hip youth demographic, then find ways to sell advertising to them. Or sell the eyeballs to someone who can. $2 billion for Facebook.com is chump change for a ~ $1 Trillion dollar industry.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    9. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by antic · · Score: 1

      What's the business model from TV?

      This time around, brands have more faith in online advertising than they did in the past.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    10. Re:go ahead, inflate that bubble again by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      This is what they may think that it may do, but it's far from certain that it will. The community may be completely resistant to efforts to push Fox content down their throats, especially if it messes up the myspace.com experience (which seems to revolve about music, fandom and ugly beeping personal webspace). Others have tried to "leverage" their freshly bought online properties (you know, back in 2000, where the number of registered users were as good as a hard currency) and failed (Bertelsmann's brief adventures with AOL Europe spring to mind). But hey, at least the ideas you described will serve to keep the stock holders happy ;-)

      Post of the day. This is always what people think... "hey, we can take this site with it's huge number of users and make it work for us". Completely forgetting that the reason people are using it is that they want the experience given.

      The Mainstream Media companies still don't get it. Part of the internet experience is about getting away from force-fed and controlled content. People want it their way. They want to know about tens of thousands of bands playing everything from techno-polka to death-metal. They don't want what you want to give them. And manufactured cool won't work any more. The blogging community will spread the story so fast, they'll kill any attempts at it.

      As soon as they try and control it, it will get killed, and someone will create a new equivalent. Creating a social networking site isn't too difficult.

  10. I still find it interesting... by L0neW0lf · · Score: 1
    Facebook has their college side set up where faculty and staff can create an account as well as the students. On the high school side, only if you're a student; no option for faculty/staff.

    I e-mailed them once, since I administer an Internet filter in an educational environment, asking them if they would allow an option for high school staff to create an account just like they did with college faculty/staff. I've never received a reply.

    --

    Never look down your nose at others. Someday, someone is bound to see your boogers.
    1. Re:I still find it interesting... by okmnji · · Score: 1

      Dude. WTF. You're just like that moronic city manager in Oklahoma that went on a tirade against CentOS developers for "hacking" his city's website when he saw the default configuration page for Apache on CentOS.

      College Facebook requires a university '.edu' address. They don't care if it's just school.edu, or faculty.school.edu, or staff.school.edu, or alumni.school.edu. You just need the address, and you're set.

      High School Facebook requires... nothing. There is absolutely nothing stopping you from regisering. At all. That's why a lot of people got pissed off when the college and high school sites were integrated. At least with the college one, you knew that other people on it were affiliated with the school in some way, and could see the email address registered to the account so you could see that, for example, the profile for Chewbacca is really jsmith@school.edu, which could then be looked up in a school directory. High school lets anyone in.

      Anyway, back on the topic of the article. I fell out of my seat when I saw that the management turned down a $750 million offer and are asking for $2 billion. Internet bubble 2.0 indeed. Sure it's a "valuable demographic", but even with the number of hits, the revenue off of two banner ads, a localized text ad, and occasional sponserships do not justify even $100 million, let alone billions. Especially when this "valuable demographic" is also the most likely to block both banner ads.

    2. Re:I still find it interesting... by SilentResistance · · Score: 1

      Yes, Mr. Oklahoma's "tirade" was ridicules. But the person you insulted wasn't making a "tirade", but just made an honest mistake. Perhaps if the computer literate (you) wasn't so rude, then maybe the computer illiterate would be more likely to ask for help before going on a "tirade".

    3. Re:I still find it interesting... by okmnji · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about computer literacy or tirades. I was talking about the ability to read and comprehend basic English. It's quite simple; s/he wants on Facebook. S/he goes to the site. Maybe s/he'll see the button that says "Register". The page becomes a registration form for college, with a linky on the top to switch to the high school registration. Fill in name, contact email, standard stuff. Fill in the text in an image to prove that it is a human and not a computer registering. Wham, bam, thank you ma'am, registered for Facebook.

    4. Re:I still find it interesting... by SilentResistance · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know it is indeed very obvious that any .edu will work. And it is your right to insult others to your content. However, I think a lot of mistakes made by the casual user stem from not acknowledging the completely obvious, and I prefer not to grill a casual user for asking a Q or making a simple mistake. Why? Because doing so will probably lead to bigger mistakes by that user... Cheers!

    5. Re:I still find it interesting... by thisisjace · · Score: 1

      You appear to be incorrect. Going through your described process prompts the user to locate their school and then you're at a page that says, "You need an invitation

      Registration for the high school Facebook is by invitation only. You need to be invited by someone who's already registered at your school."

      Did you even register? WTF Dude?

    6. Re:I still find it interesting... by okmnji · · Score: 1

      "Did you even register? WTF Dude?"

      Why yes. Yes I did. And I got the following message on the screen immediately after:

      "Thanks, we have just sent a confirmation email to (removed)@hotmail.com.

      Please click on the confirmation link inside it to confirm your email address and finish your registration."

      And I checked my old hotmail two seconds later, and I had an email from Facebook!

      I wish there was an invite model for the high school section of the site, then it would at least add a little hurdle from random people signing up. But all I had to do was pick a school, a graduation year, and a birthdate, and I was set.

    7. Re:I still find it interesting... by okmnji · · Score: 1

      Fine, except I don't believe it was insulting, or that I was grilling a casual user. I was pointing out that if he merely *tried* to register, he would likely succeed (unless for some reason there is an invitation model for some schools as thisisjace seems to have encountered). Where I come from, it is customary to get a few jests in when pointing out the bleeding obvious. If it was not apparent that the reference to the Oklahoma guy was a joke, then either my or your humor detector needs some work, eh?

    8. Re:I still find it interesting... by SilentResistance · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I also give people crap occasionally.

  11. How the negotiations went down by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > BusinessWeek reports that Facebook has turned down an offer for $750 million and is looking for 2 billion dollars. BusinessWeek reports that Facebook has turned down an offer for $750 million and is looking for 2 billion dollars.

    Great. So the future of business looks like this:

    sumredrok: yo
    facebk: yo!
    sumredrok: asm?
    facebk: 2/lots/watugot?
    sumredrok: 750m?
    facebk: up urs n00b
    sumredrok: wtf?
    facebk: 2b
    foxyrupert: pwn3d!

    "Capital, capital, everywhere, and no VCs who think."

  12. Dot com boom days? by zhiwenchong · · Score: 1

    How is a site like Facebook even worth $750 million?
    What kind of wealth does it generate?
    What kind of assets does it have?

    1. Re:Dot com boom days? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Facebook features a userbase of millions of sticky eyeballs which can be readily monetized using contextual advertising solutions that transcend the superficial and target the user's behavior.

      For example, they use their users' Google tracking cookies to determine which web sites they visit. Facebook can then deliver targeted advertisements that result in a very high clickthrough percentage relative to ordinary bannervertising.

      Facebook has also enabled rich media advertising for those who have tired of the traditional text and graphical media. A vibrant, full motion advertisement produces far more revenue and recognition.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Dot com boom days? by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can think of, is that it offers insight into the pulse of the youth community. Think of it as a gigantic data mining tool. They can know what is popular by running some queries.

    3. Re:Dot com boom days? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      A vibrant, full motion advertisement sends me scrambling to write a new adblock filter. Static graphical advertisements are also quite likely to get filtered. Text advertisements are harder to filter, and also, they are sufficiently less obtrusive that I sometimes don't try to block them.

      Which all goes to show that I'm probably well away from the average when it comes to internet use habits... :-/

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  13. well, usually... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1
    Why do the Facebook people feel the need to sell their company? Come on, just keep running Facebook the way it is. It doesn't need to be sold.

    ... such sites either make money (i.e. have a working business model) or they try to get bought by some senile billionaire (or the corporate equivalent of one).

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  14. I'd take the money and run by winkydink · · Score: 1

    There's only going to be one big winner in the 13-25 community space. Look at the massive inroads made by myspace.com. Hold out too long and the execs will end up delivering pizzas alongside the first wave of dot-com execs.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:I'd take the money and run by HarvardAce · · Score: 1
      Having known Mark personally, I can assure you that even if he made nothing on facebook for some reason, it wouldn't be long before he came up with another great (and lucrative) idea and was offered a boatload of money for it.

      Heck, I remember when he and a friend created Synapse in 2003 and was offered something in the high 6-figure range to work on it for someone for a few years. If he hadn't turned that down he'd never have been able to do facebook.

      Bottom line -- don't doubt him. After all, he seems to be following in the path of another Harvard student who didn't finish school there either.

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    2. Re:I'd take the money and run by nostrademons · · Score: 1

      He's not following in Bill Gates's path at all. 2 years after it was founded, Microsoft had 6 employees. Facebook has more than 10 times that. Microsoft sold DOS to IBM for something like $75k, which was around the same as FaceBook's revenues last year, and significantly less than the total amount of venture money invested in FaceBook. Microsoft didn't go public until 10 years after its founding, and its market cap then is well under what Mark is asking for FaceBook now.

    3. Re:I'd take the money and run by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      There's only going to be one big winner in the 13-25 community space.

      Yeah, just like there was only one big winner in the 13-25 IM space, or the 13-25 webmail space. Oh wait, maybe not.

  15. advertising? by celardore · · Score: 1

    Most of these type of things are paid for by advertising, is there even that much money spent on the internet though?

    1. Re:advertising? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause you know, so much money is spent on TV. About the only commercials that rely on that come on after 3:00am.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  16. Never heard of it by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    What is Facebook?

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    1. Re:Never heard of it by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's like myspace (social networking internet site, if you've lived under a rock at the bottom of a cave in the middle of Siberia for the past couple years), only themed more towards/integrated with college (and, more recently, high school, but not so much and separated from the college portion).

      http://facebook.com/

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
    2. Re:Never heard of it by I.M.O.G. · · Score: 1

      The high school portion of the site has been integrated. Its purpose is similar to myspace, but implementation/presentation is completetly different/superior.

  17. Re:Caspar Weinberger, dead at 88 by MindStalker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Ok apparently according to nbcnews he really is dead.
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12050783/

    But dude, pulling out a clique like that for a deal death is just sick..

  18. Dotcom is back baby! by gnovos · · Score: 1

    2 Billion for facebook!?! Holy crap, the era of the dot com is back! I mean, seriously, facebook? You could completely duplicate that entire site with two college students working part time for a month, so maybe $10,000... THAT is the barrier to entry. Please let them spend 2 billion on this... That way my plan to sell pet food online won't seem to crazy.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Building a new site is totally useless.. This has nothing absolutely nothing to do with the actual site but rather the fact it has users.... for every one popular site, your's will fail.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    2. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by bryz · · Score: 1

      I agree that the sum is ridiculous, but i'm sure these guys realize that the tech behind these sites is really simple. Rather, they're going after the millions of click happy and pop culture infused money spending drones that frequent these sites.

    3. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by gnovos · · Score: 1

      users in a demographic that is notorious for not having any brand loyalty and are willing to jump onto the next big thing with flashing neon lights and lots of shiny colors... Get a good marketing company to come up with a sweet interface full of Apple-like bubbles and plastic-liiking shapes and you'll have all of facebook's users in a month... but you'll lose them all again next month for somone else.

      Don't bet your money on mindshare when your demographic is teens.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    4. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by madro · · Score: 1

      PointCast had a hot idea in the '90s and failed to leap at a $450 million offer. Look what that got them.

      *Maybe* Facebook is different. I don't know it too well since I'm not on it.

    5. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Yep, cause that is what happened to facebook...oh wait. you cannot find users more loyal than on that site (it is actually quite sad) Let me guess, you are not a college student, and do not have college aged friends anymore...which is evident by the fact you are out of touch with that demographic and instead make generalizations backed up by NOTHING. I personally think facebook is retarded, however, it is deeply entrenched in college now and some new wizbang site isnt gonna change that.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    6. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say the Facebook interface is "full of Apple-like bubbles and plastic-liiking shapes," but then again I like to use words that mean things, the demographic isn't teens, for the most part, and, finally, take a look at Facebook and tell me again how they're losing users to the next big thing. Also, I would think that this particular demographic is notorious for having way too much brand loyalty, not too little. Head over to Aeropostercrombie and Gap to see what I mean.

    7. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      eBay can be easily duplicated as well. But not its userbase. Incidentally.. name a dotcom era company that is still around and doing very well; shit I'll do it for you: eBay.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    8. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      You can't gradually switch off of facebook. It's like the old "find your highschool friends" sites; except all your old highschool friends (at least those that made it to college) are actually you know, there.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    9. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      You missed the point of what he was saying.

      Users may be loyal (fiercely loyal?) to facebook, but that says nothing about their loyalty to brands advertised to them on facebook.

      If I were loyal to all the brands pushed in my face in college, I'd be dining at Taco Bell 3 times a day, drinking a whole lot of Zima and Bud Ice, and vacationing with my family in Panama City and Cancun.

      So the bet is that facebook enables long-term marketing relationships with a demographic but not with specific individuals in that demographic.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    10. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      They're not buying a website. They're buying the eyeballs of most every (especially the trend setters) college student in America upwards of twenty times a day. I'd buy stock in Facebook if it was available, that site isn't going anywhere.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    11. Re:Dotcom is back baby! by Janus67 · · Score: 1

      I don't completely agree. I find that College students have less brand loyalty than those in gradeschool/highschool because when you get to this point (I am a second year at Ohio State) people tend to care a bit less. Grant it you will still find those people that have (and can afford) the latest close from A&F A&E and Hollister but if something new came around people would wear that. Just today in one of my classes the teacher asked us to put our hands up if we were wearing some of the brand name clothing that you mentioned, and about 10-15% raised their hands. Then again it was a 9:30AM class so it may just be too early and not many people cared.

  19. Social Networking Backlash by bryz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    2 billion dollars? 750 million and they turned it down? This is the very cause for the Social Networking Backlash Techcrunch covered like snubster.com and isolatr.com

  20. the value isn't in the tech... by yoden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The value isn't in the tech... facebook is entrenched. Everyone is on facebook. Is that worth $2 bil? I dunno...

    --
    Computers can make otherwise intelligent people stupid, much like slashdot.
  21. No it can't by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

    Facebook is already entrenched on nearly EVERY college campus in the United States. The first thing freshmen are told by upper classmen is to get on facebook. You can't buy that kind of advertising. Sure you could create a competitor but most likely it will be brushed aside as a facebook clone. There are a few facebook and myspace competitors out there but most people have the attitude of I already have myspace and facebook why do I need another one. In order to steal facebook's users you have to have some killer feature not yet covered by myspace or facebook.

    1. Re:No it can't by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Exactly, Google learned this with Google Talk: they ended up buying 5% of AOL to be able to interoperate (ok.. there were other reasons.. like the insanely large portion of revenue Google gets through ads to AOLers..).

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:No it can't by notreallynas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And when I was in school everyone was on friendster.com. That service sniffed the $$$ and went to hell too. If all it would take to throw off facebook is a new innovative feature that would enthrall the masses, don't you think $2B would be better spent developming that?

    3. Re:No it can't by mcguyver · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Facebook is a lightweight technology that gained a lot of popularity in a short amount of time. What does that say about their users? They're fickle. Another 'facebook' will be around in two years and it's going to make the current facebook like like another friendster. Facebook is valueable, drives a _serious_ amount of traffic and has an ideal user base. You can put a high price on something like that but $2 billion? That reminds me too much of other over valued companies.

  22. The problem with their thinking by tansey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So here's what companies see when the learn about sites like Facebook or MySpace: - Huge number of people - Vast majority are under 25 - Rapid word of mouth and hype spreading Now they think to themselves: "WOW, it's just like a TV show that gets millions and millions of teenage viewers---imagine the advertising potential! We'll make a fortune!" Unfortunatly for them, they're wrong. Commercials and product placements on TV are wildly different from those on the internet. TV requires you to watch them, and things can be soaked in subliminally with relatively little effort on the advertiser's behalf. Why is this? It's because people's attention is focused on what's going on, and the advertisements just slip in there most of the time. It's a fairly benign form of advertisement if you're engrossed in the program. Websites like Facebook on the other hand would require advertisements to distract the users from what they want to do. Banner ads and flash animations don't blend into webpages like a race car driver wearing 800 different brand names or a supermodel drinking a soda on TV. All internet ads do is to cause frustration and resentment among the users towards the product. So, while I'm sure advertisers wish that they could keep the same strategies and ideas that they have been using in TV, film, and radio for the last 100 years--sorry, you can't. The internet doesn't work that way. --- Just my 2 cents.

    1. Re:The problem with their thinking by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! This is exactly the right analysis here. Contextual relevant advertising? On a site where people gossip about the next frat party and who suzi did what to last night? Gimme a break.

      --
      Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
    2. Re:The problem with their thinking by snotclot · · Score: 1

      best analysis i've read so far. MOD THIS GUY UP

    3. Re:The problem with their thinking by thejoelpatrol · · Score: 1

      But TV ads are also one-size-fits-all. It's a shotgun blast as opposed to one carefully placed bullet. Everyone here is missing the point when they ask what facebook is worth or how it could make any money. It is an advertiser's dream come true. Every logged in user has their interests on file, from music to movies to sports to technology. Targeted advertising couldn't be easier or more personal. Instead of a link to some generic dorm poster site, an ad for a band the user likes comes up. I've seen this, and it works. They know I like the Beatles and Bad Religion, so they show me ads for those posters. I've clicked on the ads, because they provide genuine value: something I like at a supposedly good price. $2 billion is a crapload, but there's plenty of revenue and growth to be had here.

  23. And in other social networking site sales news... by British · · Score: 2, Funny

    Friendster is reportedly up for sale: 5 dollars.
    Google will pay someone to take Orkut off their hands, in Brazilian currency too!

  24. frighteningly familiar... by drew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone here remember PointCast? What, never heard of them?

    They were going to be the next big thing 10 years ago. If I remember correctly, they were offered something $500 million for their company and turned it down. They said they would be 10 times that amount in a few years. Well, a few years came and went, and suddenly they were worth less than a tenth of that amount.

    Way to go, idiots. Newsflash: You're riding on a fad. Sell out when the fad is hot, because when it's gone you'll have nothing.

    Oh well, their loss.

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    1. Re:frighteningly familiar... by m50d · · Score: 1
      They are selling out. They're just saying they want more. $2B and it's yours, no questions asked.

      It's a risk, but I think it's going to work. They'll get their $2B - they're popular enough right now that someone will stump up the cash.

      --
      I am trolling
  25. To the dogs by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1
    I hope they don't sell it. MySpace is much buggier and less logical than Facebook.

    For one thing, as a "social network," MySpace tells you nothing about how you're connected to people. Facebook says "you know Pete who knows Lindsay who knows Robert who knows Kat." Much more interesting and useful, especially if a cool person happens to be one degree away from you. "Hey Katie, I met your friend Zack online. We should invite him to our party."

  26. facebook is big by motank · · Score: 2, Informative

    walk around a university computer lab and everyone's on their facebooks all the time. people use it for class projects, to hook up, to organize parties, for everything. and when you get sick of it, you graduate, you might stop using it, but then a fresh new group of people sign up. it'll never be lame. and these are 18-22 yr olds, every company's dream audience..forever.

    $2 billion might be too much, but it's definitely a worthy investment if you're a gigantic media company. yea it might be cheaper to create your own, but you can't just create that kind of popularity..

    1. Re:facebook is big by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      One thing you forget:

      The 18 - 22 year olds are a fickle bunch that will try anything once, and then ADHD will set it and it will get old and boring very soon. A $2 billion investment today will most surely mean a dried out resource 6 - 12 months from now as some new internet fad of the week rips through colleges and universities. Trends come and go on campus faster then Wall Street can figure out what they were in the first place.

      Think MP3.com, Napster, Kazaa, Limewire, Morpheus, Skype, etc, etc, etc. All once overhyped fads that went nowhere.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  27. Irrational exuberance has returned by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're looking for $2 billion? For a site that is nothing more than a glorified bulletin board?

    Apparently in 7 years peoples memories have fallen by the wayside.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  28. Turned down $750m? by eggman95 · · Score: 1

    $750 million isn't enough for them? If I were the bidder I would offer them $750 the next time around.

    1. Re:Turned down $750m? by Jetekus · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for them, that's probably what will happen... I can't comprehend what could possibly make someone turn down that amount of money... What can't you do with hundreds of millions of dollars?!

  29. 2 billion for a few months of ad space by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Basically there's no technology to buy there, they're buying 2 billion dollars worth of ad space. They intend to use the site to ad/spam the crap out of the members (because where else is there a revenue stream with that site?) and then run it into the ground a la mp3.com. It is inevitable that the winners are the people who get the $2B, the people paying that are buying a particular demographic's attention for a few weeks until the demographic bails on the site, that's all.

    --
    stuff |
  30. alumni email addresses for life by peter303 · · Score: 1

    If you went to college, many give alumni free email forwarding from a school site. This is for three reasons (1) the prestige of having a college email address; (2) a stable one that will last for 30,50,70 years for life; and (3) they get your real email address for fund raising.

  31. I'm not sure how long that will last by JimBobJoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I disagree with the idea that Facebook's registration system is its advantage because it closed--the advantage of the system is that it offers easy searching for people and arranges them in nifty, easy to understand hierarchies. Because Facebook requires registration from a college/high school email address the ease of searching and hierarchical arrangement is retained (whereas most people, I suspect, would default to signing up on Myspace with whatever aol.com or hotmail.com account they have.) This plus is a side-effect of the closedness, but I don't believe the closedness is an advantage all unto itself.

    Some suggest that Facebook is somehow more safe for its participants. A surface examination may suggest that, but I think on a practical level it's not. As the security fears of Myspace die down (they're really just the normal internet dating fears that we've always heard except now brought down to 14 year olds plus the current hysteria regarding sexual offenders) I think that Facebook's closedness will be looked upon as a disadvantage.

    After all, if you're going to spend $2 billion on Facebook, you'd want a pretty strong potential for growth, and Facebook will get maxed out too quickly, and the only new growth for it will be from new high schoolers who can add themselves in. The brand has to open up to create the value.

    (I add, incidentally, that I've thought about this because Facebook, as it was originally designed, was a reasonable concept for a small college like Harvard. I go to Ohio State, where the idea of having so much information about you (until recently the default) presented to what is a mega-city sized student/alumni population is assinine. Though I've got a facebook account, I find the obscurity of myspace more convenient (though I don't post salacious pictures of myself doing stupid things that employers could discover later.)

    1. Re:I'm not sure how long that will last by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      What all information is on there about you? Just as much as you put in. You really only need a name and an email, correct?

  32. Re:And in other social networking site sales news. by HarvardAce · · Score: 1
    Google will pay someone to take Orkut off their hands, in Brazilian currency too!

    Oooh! How many is a brazilian ?

    --
    Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
  33. why did friendster not succeed? by peter303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Friendster was one of the earlier social networking attempts (its name derived from napster's brief file sharing success). When I first tried to use Friendster its servers were as slow as molasses. Facebook launched on Harvard's InterNet-2 capacity servers before going private.

    Second, Facebook has a simply defined social network- the school. On Friendster you have to build your own.

    Third is the luck of fads and momentum. Kids are notorious for following fads. Facebook was in the right place at the right time.

    1. Re:why did friendster not succeed? by ThinkComp · · Score: 1

      "Facebook launched on Harvard's InterNet-2 capacity servers before going private."

      This is not true.

  34. No need for a billion dollars... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
    1) Go work for another social network web site.

    2) Steal their source code.

    3) Quit and start your own site.

    4) Profit!

    Apparently worked for Orkut and FaceBook!

    It would be so nice if it took creativity and hard work and perhaps a little luck to get rich, but apparently a stale idea and a little PHP/MySQL knowledge is enough these days.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  35. Why facebook is better than myspace by Mo+B.+Dick · · Score: 5, Informative

    After reading some comments on here, it seems that some of you put facebook in the same category as myspace. Facebook is much better than Myspace and here is why.

    1. All facebook profiles are uniform. They are the same color and can only have one profile picture. This makes everything so much easier on the eyes. The pages load quicker and relevant information is easy to acquire. There aren't a million pictures, animated gifs, songs, videos all over the page.

    2. The majority of ads are text. Most of the ads are google type text ads, and only 1 or 2 ads are shown at a time. And here's the best part: The ads are usually bought by a student or local business. So instead of seeing huge flash ads for some shitty movie or band, you see relevant ads about a local bar special or someone who has a sub-lease available in their apartment.

    3. You have to be in College (or now high school) to join. Facebook requires you to have a college e-mail adddress to join. While I'm not saying every college student is perfect and a big winner in society, you have to face the fact that most people that are on myspace are huge losers. I'm talking about all of the people who work the dead-end minimum wage jobs, do drugs every night, just take webcam pictures of themselves, and are going nowhere in life. There is none of that on facebook.

    4. Information is not readily available to anyone who wants it. To view someone's profile you have to go to the same school as them. If you don't go to the same school you can still see that they have a profile, but you have to be added as their friend before you can actually see the profile. This greatly cuts down on all of the stalkers out there.

    5. Facebook is a legitmate communication tool. Many professors have embraced the technology and joined facebook. Even my college president (at the u of Iowa) is on it. I know many friends who now send messages to others on facebook instead of e-mail, citing the fact that most students will check their facebook messages more often than their e-mail. Myspace can't be used for communication except for saying things like "thanx 4 the add", "check out my new webcam pix", "damn baby u r so hot"

    There are probably even more comparisons I could make but I'm running late for class. Facebook hasn't been around quite as long as myspace, so I'm sure it doesn't have as many subscribers. I'm bettting though as years go and more people go to college the site will become much bigger than myspace. It's just so much cleaner and easier to use.

    I think selling facebook would be a huge mistake. The way it stands now, the site is run by a couple of students (or former students, they may have graduated) They've added many features, but have done it subtly. It seems like every time more functionality is added on myspace it just makes the profiles that much uglier. When it happens on facebook, it makes it that much more usable. I'm only afraid that if the wrong company buys the site, they will try to compete with myspace and try to turn facebook into another myspace. Sorry for the rant, but I hope that this post will enlighten some of the people who have just read about these sites but haven't actually been able to join the facebook.

    1. Re:Why facebook is better than myspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right on. As a recent college graduate I can also attest to the value of the site. However, one major advantage that facebook has is the ability to figure out who you hooked up with the night before. If you can just vaguely remember what she looked up then you don't even have to remember her name!

      We actually wanted to create a site at our university somewhat like this, but the privacy concerns wouldn't allow us. We had a couple of kids together that thought about doing it independant and now with the numbers $750m and $2B floating around, my regret is greater than ever.

    2. Re:Why facebook is better than myspace by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      I think this is spot-on and extremely insightful. Except...

      I'm talking about all of the people who work the dead-end minimum wage jobs, do drugs every night, just take webcam pictures of themselves, and are going nowhere in life. There is none of that on facebook.

      WTF? I don't know what boring-ass school you went to, but that's about all there is on our Facebook.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    3. Re:Why facebook is better than myspace by ezzewezza · · Score: 1

      GP said: Even my college president (at the u of Iowa)

      P said: WTF? I don't know what boring-ass school you went to

      I say: At least you got that it was a boring-ass school. I mean, it IS in Iowa.

    4. Re:Why facebook is better than myspace by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      I think selling facebook would be a huge mistake.

      For the longterm future of Facebook and it's users, maybe. For the current owners? Please. Their biggest mistake would be NOT selling it. $750M (or more) split between a couple of college guys? Take the money and run, dudes. You will probably never, ever have a chance like this again. Even this one may be fleeting.

    5. Re:Why facebook is better than myspace by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
  36. How much are they making in revenue right now? by cndrr · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of curious how much revenue Facebook pulls in from advertising.. I've advertised just at my university and that cost about $10/day -- I have no idea how much it is for a global advertisement or how many advertisers there are.

    And to everyone that's saying Facebook is stupid/pointless/never heard of it... I re-iterate what others have said: if you're in college right now, it -is- important. It's one of the easiest ways to exchange contact information; all you need to do is remember a name and ask, "are you on Facebook?" and bam -- email, address, clubs, phone number, pictures, everything. It's extremely convenient when you meet people in unlikely situations. And I check Facebook usually once a day, and compared to a lot of people at my school, that's not bad at all. So make fun of it all you want... it's a great networking tool and very, VERY popular right now for the 18-25 crowd.

    --
    cndrr
  37. why? by emo+boy · · Score: 1

    facebook is a niche site towards students...how will they convert that over to a public site and if not how will that help viacom?

  38. playing catch up by na641 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    sigh, when will these people learn that the net is in no way stagnant... as any long time user of these communities will tell you, dont expect any of them to be around for too long. instead of trying to play catch up with their competitors online, these large corporations should instead try to innovate (gasp!!) and perhaps start a new trend online. only then can they gain a real foothold.

    trust me... as soon as facebook becames 'corporate' people will flee from it.

  39. Re:Students = Money by ubergenius · · Score: 1

    It's not even just education-related services... Anything that services the high school and college age crowd is going to get a renewable audience (thus able to include MySpace, and why it is so successful). http://www.student-manager.com/, http://www.facebook.com/, http://www.myspace.com/, http://www.blackboard.com/ all have one thing in common: They service the high school to college age crowd.

    --
    Student Manager - Take control of your education!
  40. Mine makes you join the alumni society by georgeha · · Score: 1

    So, after dropping 40+k in your coffers, I have to ante up an additional $60 a year for email? Yeah, I'll get right on that.

  41. Re:HAHAHahaahaha! by Risen888 · · Score: 1

    Unheard of? How old are you?!

    --
    Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
  42. Facebook... by jtalerico · · Score: 1

    Facebook me!!

  43. $2 Billion == Not for sale by GopherDylan · · Score: 1

    I think what the facebook people are trying to say is that the company is not for sale unless you pony up with $2 billion. If offered that much money then they would consider giving up creative control and any revenue that might be streaming from it. It's not about being greedy but rather about putting a high pricetag on something you don't want to sell in the first place. I wouldn't sell my car but if someone offered me $100,000 for it, you bet I would sell it and buy another one.

    My understanding is that they were offered $750 million not that they were looking for a buyer. That makes a huge difference.

  44. agreed by Dr+Floppy · · Score: 1

    They do need to keep it the way it is, campushook was ruined when it was taken over.

  45. Money. by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

    Why can't people come along and offer me millions of dollars for my websites? Damn... Oh.. right.. content. Heh.. minor detail. :-)

  46. FaceBook by certel · · Score: 1

    Facebook and Myspace are the best way for old people to pick up unde.... err, they're great marketing resources!!

    For people that actually use those sites to create a network of associates, it's great business. I've made a number of contacts that have benefited by greatly.

  47. 2 billion is about right by theheff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see so many questions about why 2 billion dollars is being asked for the ownership of facebook... it's really quite simple. Aside from the pictures and messaging, each member of facebook can list interests, favorite quotes, books, movies, albums, etc etc etc. There is SO much information going around on facebook, and though it may appear useless by looking at just one individual site, the information from every facebook site is pretty meaningful to a marketer. Information is money, just look at google. Will all that data you'd be able to see trends, what products will work where, what's important to this generation, etc. The possibilities with facebook are enormous, and I'm actually surprised that it's not higher than 2 billion.

  48. PointCast called, they said to take the money by mccrew · · Score: 1
    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  49. Re:HAHAHahaahaha! by aventius · · Score: 1

    Did you even go to college? First its the seventh most trafficked site on the net. Second, the name is a reference to college books of freshmen faces that many give out -- aka face books. I use both myspace and facebook and facebook is by far better and actually has a use for people in college. facebook is our phone directory, meeting place and bulletin board. when you meet someone, its no longer "whats your phone number." thats been replaced with "are you on facebook." by knowing their name only, you get all their information. Also, say you need to ask that person you sit next to in class a question but don't know their name... you can search through the school's classes and find their profile. you can also stalk hot girls too. you may like myspace but to say that facebook is unheard of --- that is a gross understatement. your problem is that you're just out of the demographic.

    --
    [insert lame joke here]
  50. Ads will kill it by engagebot · · Score: 1

    The problem is, if you stuff Facebook full of ads, people will leave. Just as quickly as they came.

    Thats why facebook has emerged victorious (somewhat), because its solid and clean, and only other students can look at your profile (aka fairly secure). Pump it full of annoying ads and stuff, and the facebook crowd will find somewhere else. Pump Google's homepage full of blinking flashing ads and watch another 'clean' search engine pop up and take marketshare...

    --
    Han shot first.
    1. Re:Ads will kill it by snotclot · · Score: 1

      Yep. MOD PARENT UP

    2. Re:Ads will kill it by Jetekus · · Score: 1
      I agreed with you until you mentioned Google...

      Do you know how much Google makes from advertising?!

  51. 2 billion dollars ?? !!! Hahaha . LOL. by zymano · · Score: 1

    There is NOT enough advertising to ask for that much money.

    Advice - SELL and get out . Nothing unique about the website.

    The Facebook boys got caught stealing source code from ConnectU.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_(website)

  52. haha google pointcast by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

    I'd sure as hell never heard of them. So I googled them. The first result? "PointCast: The Rise and Fall of an Internet Star". At one point the article says Microsoft was bundling their software with internet explorer. There will always be stubborn dumbasses. And watching them fall on their faces will never stop being funny.

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  53. Re:HAHAHahaahaha! by snotclot · · Score: 1

    there is a BIG change though. Facebook changed their advanced search which used to be awesome, to a new lame-o search that sucks. i think they did it to prevent stalking but it could be the death of their site. Search is the big thing, and if someone replicated Facebook but with AWESOME search (say, Google), Facebook would be dead in an instant. you used to be able to look people up by cross-listing Concentration, and say, Year, and say, interests. Not anymore. LAME!

  54. Net Fads are like Cell Division by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

    As most Slashdotters know, there's always some Next Big Thing happening on the Internet. Nearly all the tech we take for granted was a huge deal when it was new. Think about the Web, scripting languages (dynamic pages), peer-to-peer, instant messaging, blogging, and countless others.

    The funny thing is, they all seem to follow the same course. First, there is a precursor, be it a similar technology or a less-successful attempt at something very similar. Then, a huge rise to the point where "everybody" knows about it and is predicting either paradise or apocalypse because of it. After this, it either fades and dies, or splits into many different companies/groups offering the service, or a bunch of splinter technologies. Wash, rinse, repeat.

  55. We're not as gay by BoxSocial · · Score: 1

    Surely what they do to recoup their 2 billion will force the user base elsewhere? Plus this might be huge in the U.S but I don't see it taking off in the U.K simply because we're not as gay as you lot. Cheerio!

    --
    Give me good ratings or I will close down the internet.
  56. It's the audience!! by da.maestro · · Score: 1

    I don't know how many people are going to have to say this, but:

    It's not the technology or anything else concretely valuable about the site that Facebook is trying to sell. It's the huge advertising audience they have at their disposal. Sure, whoever buys it may have to think up some original advertising methods to make their money back, but that kind of audience is worth it.

    We're talking about an *absolutely huge* number of 18-25 year olds, with their shiny new credit cards (as somebody pointed out - i don't remember who), ready to spend online. It may not last, but $2bn may well be what that kind of audience is worth *right now*. And with some ongoing improvement, it's quite possible that the audience will be self-renewing, purely through word of mouth from entrenched users.

    Even if a better quality product comes along, bigger *does* have value. People *will* sign up simply because it's what their friends are using. I've seen it. Hell, I've done it. But what this means is that the audience that exists there today may well exist a few years from now. And that $2bn may just end up being worth it.

    Me, I wouldn't buy it at $2bn. But I can see how some advertising giant might.

    --
    Every rule has an exception. Except this one. Oh bugger...
  57. What this story is really about by drix · · Score: 1

    Mark Zuckerberg is 23 and will probably have be worth >$300 million by the end of the year.

    What have you done with your life?

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  58. What's it worth? by Damana+Mathos · · Score: 1

    Here's how I would think about the value.

    According to Wikipedia the site has

    • over 6 million student accounts, with around 20k new per day
    • of the colleges supported, 85% of students have profiles
    • of this 85%, 60% log in daily, 93% log in at least once a month

    So let's say... 6 million users, $750 mil price - that's paying $125 per user. If you needed a 10% return and assuming it's a stable user base that won't disappear, you'd want to make a profit of $12.50 per user per year. Is that reasonable? I don't think it's unattainable given it's regularly used and the site's demographic.

    If they get $2 bil and you need a 15% return, you'd want to make $50 per user per year, or you'd need additional user growth beyond the 6 mil.

    --
    MyLinkVault - online bookmarks with a fast drag-and-dr
    1. Re:What's it worth? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      # over 6 million student accounts, with around 20k new per day
      # of the colleges supported, 85% of students have profiles

      In other words, they're not going to continue to add 20k of users a day. And they're going to be adding that usually when each years email accounts are created, not steadily.

  59. Verbs by sciurus0 · · Score: 1

    Is Facebook worth $2 billion? I don't know. I do know that there are only two websites whose names I hear used as verbs every day: google and facebook. If you want to see what a sample facebook profile looks like, click here. This doesn't demonstrate the ajax-y goodness that constitutes a lot of the interface.

  60. Re:2 billion dollars ?? !!! Hahaha . LOL. by amerinese · · Score: 1

    My take--this is a bullshit rumor, and they float the high number out there just so when someone REALLY offers $300 million, no one balks and everyone thinks it's actually CHEAP.

  61. and myspace's random errors by vistic · · Score: 1

    How often do you try and view a page on myspace to get some message like "down for maintenance" and then you hit refresh and it's there. I swear myspace serves error pages at random... and all of their notifications about maintenance are lies. It's the buggiest website I've ever seen, and it hasn't gotten better even with News Corp. backing.

    Facebook has always been pretty nice. And they regularly add new features to it and make improvements to the interface. Oh yeah, and it's pretty much never "down for maintenance".

  62. Re:Not quite. by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    Indeed, being anonymous on Facebook makes no sense. Now, I've noticed there are a lot of people that set their name as Chuck Norris, Jesus Christ, and Santa Claus. (Of course, some of them are actually named Charles Norris.) And I also notice they changed the search since the last time I searched.