Slashdot Mirror


It Does Little and Not Very Well

wiredog writes "A Washington Post (frryyy) review of the Nokia 770 Internet Tablet, a handheld Linux device. The reviewer complains about the lack of keyboard, poor WiFi implementation, outdated software, non-standard memory card, and almost as many crashes as an unpatched Win98 install."

318 comments

  1. The Input/Output Hurdle by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful


    From TFA:
    Its biggest flaw is the keyboard that Nokia left out. You can enter text only by tapping a tightly packed on-screen keyboard, with help from an automatic word-completion option, or by taking your chances with handwriting recognition that's either ploddingly slow or wildly inaccurate. That alone should sink anything built for constant Web and e-mail use.
    This latest failure underscores once again the main problem with miniaturization...that while we can continue to make things smaller and smaller, their interfaces (input - keyboard/mouse, output - screen/speakers) must remain large enough to be useful, and the larger, the better. Even if you totally discount other problems like removable data storage, the main problem of user interfaces will continue to stand in the way of true miniaturization.

    I'm still wondering why we haven't seen a personal data device marketed with either a roll-up or projected keyboard, fingertip mouse, and VR glasses? Freed of these constraints, the device itself could easily be made small enough to be wearable.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by monoqlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Miniaturization is a problem, but it seems mostly for people trying to make many-purpose devices like these ones. It's not as difficult to build a very usable, very tiny interface on something that only performs one or a few specialized functions, such as the iPod or a cell phone. Trying to make a productivity tool, however, requires some ingenious compromise of size and functionality. Make it too small with two few buttons, it's too hard and not worthwhile for people to pick it up and learn. Make it too big with too many and it ceases to be truly portable.

      I've thought about this for awhile and for the life of me I can't seem to come up with a compelling way of making a small, multi-purpose interface with a dealable learning curve. For these devices to succeed they have to be amenable to absolute manipulation in the same way that standard, non-digital physical objects are, and that's a mighty challenge that I don't think anyone has been able to succeed at to date.

    2. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Jac_no_k · · Score: 2, Interesting
    3. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      The MS Origami devices coming out have a novel onscreen keyboard interface. Who knows how well it works, but at least it's a different appraoch than the traditional "picture of a keyboard" approach.

      Pix here:
      http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cebit-web-site- shows-origami-ui/

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    4. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Mathiasdm · · Score: 1

      I wish cell phones would use such a keyboard! It's so annoying to type text messages on a cell phone key board (slow as hell!).

      Why don't more companies utilise this technology?

      --
      Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    5. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Aumaden · · Score: 1
      You mean like this?

      It's useable, barely. A nightmare for a touch typist as there's nothing to tell you whether you're finger is on a key or smack in the middle of 3 keys.

      I predict you won't see real miniturization until implants are available. Wait til you see what your grandkids can do!

    6. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I want to know is why nobody has made a 1-2lb, 8-12" screen, convertible tablet with the power of a PDA instead of a laptop (and the cost to match). Not everyone who wants a portable tablet needs it to be fast too, or has $3000 to spend on it!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by johnfink · · Score: 1
      Why don't more companies utilise this technology?
      Probably the $179.99 price tag, which would surely be increased by reducing the size to small enough to fit in a modern phone.
    8. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they are vaporware or (if they do exist) don't work.

    9. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by everphilski · · Score: 1

      price tag and lack of tactile feedback.

    10. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      This is a stupid argument. If it were true, the pocket pc market would have died long ago. Alot of people love pocket pc's so, no my friend I'd say the biggest problem is really the crappy handwritting recognition on this device. I bet those poor buggers had to write their own support for it. If they weren't nokia and could use Windows CE I'm sure this wouldn't have featured as an issue.

    11. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by jalefkowit · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's not as difficult to build a very usable, very tiny interface on something that only performs one or a few specialized functions, such as the iPod or a cell phone.

      I don't even know about that -- there's definitely a non-trivial market for cellphones with big, big buttons, for example, which implies that cellphones haven't exactly nailed the UI thing even for single task devices. Nokia has even started making this an explicit part of their marketing; see their new "Buttons for Humans" campaign for an example.

    12. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't understand why these new approaches always come in two flavors: straight alphabet (which I abhor) or a QWERTY keyboard twisted to fit. QWERTY is fine, but does that layout really translate directly to this design? The most important keys are going to be the same, but you don't have eight fingers resting on them at all times with this design. I just imagine that, if you're going to reinvent the keyboard anyway, there is a probably a more efficient way to arrange the keys as well, rather than forcing straight-keyboard QWERTY into your design.

      I realize they do this so people can find the keys (and so their product will be more likely to be adopted) but since this is all software anyway, surely it would not be difficult to provide the new design and offer a QWERTY layout as an option.

    13. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the Siemens SimPad? This one: http://www.usedhandhelds.com/usedhh_reviews_sl4.as p ?
      The SimPad that bombed because nobody wanted it?

      It's not a bad machine actually, and I happen to own one. But I always wished it had WiFi and Bluetooth built in, and an easier way to make it run Linux, and it could be a little smaller as well. The screen resolution was right though.

      So I bought a Nokia 770...

    14. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Most users are familiar with the placement of qwerty. They won't have to learn a new location or hunt and peck. Ideally, since it's software, you should be able to program it for anything.

    15. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by smagoun · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What I want to know is why nobody has made a 1-2lb, 8-12" screen, convertible tablet with the power of a PDA instead of a laptop (and the cost to match).

      We did.

      The Pepper Pad has an 8.4", 800x600 screen, a 624Mhz Xscale CPU, a 20GB disk, Wi-Fi, bluetooth, USB, and a full keyboard for about $800. It runs Linux and includes both Firefox 1.5 and Flash 7.

    16. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I'd want one of these things too. The "portable screen" idea microsoft had was a start (several years ago they briefly marketed a concept that was basically an underpowered tablet running nothing but a glorified VNC client showing the display on your real computer) but I need something standalone. Don't need to store my mp3 collection on it, so 4GB flash (harddrive=movingparts=bad) should be enough to load the OS and basic apps. Wireless, a good screen, USB for an optional keyboard, and I'd be set.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    17. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by thePig · · Score: 1

      I dont know whether such a device is already in the market - or not.
      Anyways here goes -
      A virtual reality eyeglass - with instead of typing - look (down) at the keys.
      As we focus on an area (which contains one set of keys say -
      rty
      fgh
      cvb
      that area zooms though so that we will get what we want. Just zoom our eyes towards it(maybe a dot on the center of the key, where we can focus then), and it is considered as typed.

      Then we look up, and lo the monitor has what we typed.

      Problem is that we cant wear this thing on the road and go - the essential requirement for such small devices..
      But when you are in the back seat of a car etc, this should be fine - provided the person gets used to it .. (if he can :-) )

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    18. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by mrchaotica · · Score: 1, Troll

      Let me clarify my previous statement: all that stuff I said, but with a 1024x768 (or higher) screen and a real QWERTY keyboard, like on a laptop.

      In other words, this except with a swiveling digitizer screen.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    19. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      The SimPad that bombed because nobody wanted it?
      And the reason for that is known. From the article you linked to:
      My chief complaint with most of these systems is that they are large and "clunky" looking. Considering that comparable hardware (with the exception of the large display) fits in a Pocket PC, I don't understand why the designers make tablets so thick and heavy. Certainly the larger glass display requires a stiff and sturdy housing, but can't someone make a tablet that doesn't look and feel like a brick?
      I want something that's less than half an inch thick and looks as if it was made by Apple. It's technically possible, so why doesn't anybody do it?!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by eonlabs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what if we took a look at the design for a gameboy. The hand held videogame systems, although reasonably large, seem to be very comfortable for doing a variety of input commands. There's always the option of using the back of the device for input. Nobody seems to do that.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    21. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by jdray · · Score: 1

      I'd be more than happy if someone constructed a Palm device the size of the Steno pad I carry around to all my meetings. It's an extreme upscale from the current crop of Palm or WinCE devices, and not sized right for a pocket, but right in line with the usability that people in an office are used to. The Palm OS has all the features the thing would need, and a battery the size of one you could get in a package that size would run the thing quite a while.

      For those of you not familiar with the common, top spiral bound Steno pad, think of the PADD from ST:TNG. That's the device I'm talking about.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    22. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by arodland · · Score: 1

      Well... I dunno about that. I actually find that cell phones usually have too few buttons and that their buttons are too small if you want to do anything really useful with them. It's best to just stick to making phone calls.

      When it comes to a PDA, I think that perhaps the best form-factor out there is the clamshell Zaurus. Or at least it would be if they filled the entire "screen area" with screen. Yeah, it's a bit bigger than people have come to expect from a PDA, but it's still quite manageable, and it even fits in a pocket if you have big pockets. And that buys you a very good amount of visible information, buttons and such that are big enough to interact with, and a keyboard that's actually comfortable after some adjustment.

    23. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miniaturization is the real deal because space is a flop!

    24. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by matzebrei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One option is to use chord-based keyboards, such as the Frogpad or others. That way, you can have fewer (and larger) keys but still be able to do most, if not all, of the same keys as a traditional keyboard.

    25. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by edwardpickman · · Score: 0
      Make it too small with two few buttons, it's too hard and not worthwhile for people to pick it up and learn.

      This is the difference between pro and consumer cameras. Pro cameras have buttons consumer ones have menus. I can figure out most pro cameras in minutes and they are easy to use. Consumer cameras are tough to figure out and slow to set and use. They do it in part to keep cost down but it's also because the normal point and shoot consumer doesn't want to set a lot of controls and get confused by all the buttons so they keep it simple.

    26. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by arivanov · · Score: 1
      This costs nearly as much as the whole bloody tablet...

      The biggest problem with the Nokia is that it has only a USB Device interface. A USB Host interface would have solved most of the usability problems. It would have also allowed it to be used for many applications where people grudgingly accept the exorbitantly priced Tosh or HP tablets. Recently, I was looking for a device to run some fairly trivial software written in Perl or Python to process field lab data. The Nokia would have been the perfect match if it had reasonable means of interfacing. Unfortunately it did not.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    27. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by simonsen77 · · Score: 1

      It had been my hope the Origami/UMPCs would be like this - the size of a steno, instant on/off and battery life of a Palm, and the flexibility of XP. Oh well...

    28. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Zimzat · · Score: 1

      There's always the option of using the back of the device for input. Nobody seems to do that.

      Nintedo's N64 controller did that. Everyone I've seen try to play with one of those that wasn't a "hard core" gamer had a hard time figuring out where the elusive "z" button was, and even then they had a hard time using it.

      While on the subject of bad interface designs, I once played an X-Box game that used both axial controls at the same time on top of pressing buttons and the tilt controls themselves. Let me tell you how hard that was to get even a basic grasp of. I don't want to even imagine how complicated it would be for someone who has trouble with normal game pad controls.

    29. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it has no HWR, a battery life that can best be expressed in minutes and is hideously expensive, compared to the Nokia (and even to the SimPad).

      I have a 5 year old Fujitsu Stylistic 3400 that has almost the same specs as the Pepperpad, but cost one quarter of it on eBay. (granted, I have to plug in a dongle to get Bluetooth, but that also means that I can go without it and have a whole extra five minutes of battery life)

    30. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by schlick · · Score: 1

      I'd also be interested in a video iPod with a laser based projector that had wireless head phones with extended bluetooth range. Get a group of people with the headphones and you could have your movie theater almost anywhere!!!

      Now a portable device that incorporates this technology would be something I'd be interested in as well.

      http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/input/8193/

      Laser based projector
      http://www.audioholics.com/news/editorials/laserpr ojectorscellphones.php

      --
      "It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does everything." -Homer Simpson
    31. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      Something like the ClioNXT might interest you, as long as you can stomach Windows CE.NET 5.0. Well, that and the fact that it's been delayed for the better part of a year. At least the systems are finally entering beta testing.

      It has the physical specifications to match your desired device: 10.4" screen, Wifi, SD and PC Card, QWERTY keyboard and swivel touch screen. Last I heard it was to cost between $799 and $999.

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    32. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've thought about this for awhile and for the life of me I can't seem to come up with a compelling way of making a small, multi-purpose interface with a dealable learning curve."

      Let's look into brain implants. Like an icepick into the forhead, interface a device to the icepick and bingo, takes care of so many input and output probems.
      Although everyone would look silly walking around with an icepick in their forehead.

    33. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Spoons · · Score: 1

      Anyone else thinks its a little funny that their flash ad that shows how easy to use their phone has menu items that move around the screen. I hope the guy that designed the ad didn't design the phone.

    34. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by trewornan · · Score: 1

      The answer is reliable, fast and accurate voice recognition. I believe this is a lot closer than is generally realised. In fact, although it's not available "on the street" I suspect certain institutions already have voice recognition technology capable of almost complete accuracy without needing training even over multiple languages and regional accents.

    35. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      but in that case, it was one button. The only button that was hidden on the back, so it's understandable.

      What if you had a half qwerty on each side of the back of a gameboy. Your hands would line up the same as if you were on a regular keyboard. You might even be able to type almost as fast as normal. The only issue I see is false positives from the weight of the thing, but if you have a non-button chunk in your hands, it still might work.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    36. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Okay as a fan of the Dvorak layout I'm going to throw this out there:
      The failure isn't in minaturization, it's a failure in developing an optimal input method for the device of this size. I'm sick and tired of manufactures throwing a "QWERTY" keyboard on every small minature device thinking that their customers are too stupid to learn a more optimal input method. If you are going to make a small input device, make it optimal, don't just make it QWERTY. We have ten fingures on our hands for a reason, why develop a device that requires the use of two thumbs with a sub-optimal input layout?

      That being said, it's a shame this device failed. I think Nokia was perhaps a bit too ambitious, trying to develop their own portable platform from scratch. They would have been better off if they based it off WindowsCE, and focused more on the applications aspect.

    37. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by popeguilty · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the button on the back was a trigger button, in a good position for a psuedo-pistolgrip.

      The half-a-qwerty idea would fail, imo, simply because most people can't touchtype.

    38. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The half-a-qwerty idea would fail, imo, simply because most people can't touchtype.

      I don't know if that's a cause or an effect - would people get better at touch-typing if they were forced do by a well-designed device that required it?

    39. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      Who wants a keyboard?

      Honestly, are those tiny "thumb keyboards" any easier to use than tapping a virtual one with the stylus?

      Either you can have the thumb keyboard there, or you can have a bigger screen. I'll take the screen.

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
    40. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by salec · · Score: 1
      or by taking your chances with handwriting recognition that's either ploddingly slow or wildly inaccurate.

      I'd say that the problem is our gap between what we want and what we can at the moment, in terms of storage space and/or CPU computational power. Perhaps soon we will have enaugh fast palmtop machines that will do realtime recognition of handwriting and speech (dictate).

      Today, when storage is less of the problem then CPU power is, why should we have handwriting recognition in the first place?

      Commands, if not equipped with keyboard shortcuts(oh, wait, we don't have a keyboard), are easier to issue by ticking checkboxes or traveling the menues.

      As for the text itself, handwriten notes *should* (not always true even for myself) be recognizable by writer's own brain (and hopefuly by brains of other people who are forced to read them). The handwritng to text, if needed, can be done offline, later, and email (the example where considerable amount of text must be put in and sent out ASAP) can:

      a) wait till peevee CPU on handheld computer is done with recognition of the whole message,
      b) be typed on on-screen keyboard if it's short,
      c) be sent as gif (or png) picture... perhaps awkward today, but with growing base of users, people will tend to be understandable and even like it - a touch of humanity, straightforward inclusion of drawings, symbols and signatures...
      d) there is also an, quite comfortable, opportunity of recording and compressing low-quality (mono, low sample rate/low bit resolution) audio (speech) message and sending it as small file - "dictagram"

      We as humanity have been on a trip thru technology. The simplified text code (teletype) was nescecity for first, weak machines to understand us, and even before that simplified and uniformed letters were nescecity to enable printing and speed up multiplication of books (information storage and disseminaton). Now the pendulum is swinging back, we are gaining our hand-freedom again and yet, we are complaining, because we are now got used to "type letters" and lost our hand motorics that has been (or is it "had been", already?) used for generations and centuries.

      I am not trying to insult consumers by calling them lazy, but it seems that there is a space for useful gadgets and services that none is willing to offer because they are afraid that market will perceive it as an degradation, or wasting (of ever-cheaper storage space, or ever-expanding bandwidth).

      Instead, hard to crack non-problems are poorely "solved" just to keep information content artificially low - none gets to analyze my handwriting or my voice, so privacy of my personality is preserved in my communications, which may be good, if I happen to have tinfoil hat wearer attitude ... or bad, if I happen to (or if I think that) have good personality which people tend to like.

      This last observation predicts females would love said gadgedts, while males (geeks especially) probably wouldn't. Also, it shows that, not alike with cell phones, male geek consumers are still perceived THE target market when new handheld computers are designed.
    41. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by JunkmanUK · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, yes. People have learned to type extremely fast on standard nine digit pads (SMS). On the flip side, and more damning, is that while learning to type fast most people need to see the keys and symbols. Most people would become infuriated before they became competant.

    42. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by ozbon · · Score: 1

      Currently I use an iMate K-JAM (and who the hell comes up with these shitty names?) which gets round the keyboard issue by using a keyboard that slides out from under the main phone display. So far it seems to work pretty well, and is a lot nicer to use than the standard mobile keypad.

      You can use the stylus/PDA stuff too, with an on-screen keyboard, although personally I hate that. The only real problem with the slide-out keyboard so far is that it makes it obvious it's a fairly high-end (and thus stealable/valuable) device.

      The really interesting stylus/onscreen-keyboard based input mechanism, though, is SHARK (Shorthand-Aided Rapid Keyboarding) - which uses pattern-recognition to form the words, as you slide the stylus between letters. I've used the demo version a few times now, and it's a superb (and easy to learn) method. I'd hope it'll get used by a lot of devices before long...

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    43. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      For that price, it ought to have a 20GB 1.8" hard drive (although the card slots do go a long way towards making up for that). Of course, by the time I added a PC card hard drive (or microdrive or large-capacity flash memory) it becomes perilously close in price to an Acer tablet that runs XP, and not all that far off from a Thinkpad X41 tablet, which is (as far as I can tell) just about the best one you can buy.

      Not to mention that the specifications for the ClioNXT fail to mention either the processor type and speed or the battery life...

      Oh, and as far as WinCE goes, I have only one question: does it run Linux?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    44. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by geoffhall · · Score: 1

      You know, the only thing I can think of that might be usable for input into any miniture device without a steep learning curve is .... (dum dum dum) a pair of bluetooth gloves.... with some sort of position/acceleration sensors so it is possible to either use sign language, virtual keyboard (tapping in the air... yes very geeky)as input, or use own combination of hand movements or gestures, or tracing letters with an index finger. Combined with a pair of VR glass for overlaying keyboard, fingertip traces, etc would be very nice too.... We could use the skillz we have now.... (just like in that application I filled out for a PHD over the internet...)

    45. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 1
    46. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by jdray · · Score: 1

      Close. Very close. Three pounds is a lot, though. Maybe that's what it takes, though; I don't know what the weight of a 10.5" screen is. Still, for three pounds, you'd think the battery would last longer. And what's with all the non-screen real estate? I'm after something that's essentially an up-size of the Palm V, sleek and minimalist.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    47. Re:The Input/Output Hurdle by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Miniaturization is a problem, but it seems mostly for people trying to make many-purpose devices like these ones. It's not as difficult to build a very usable, very tiny interface on something that only performs one or a few specialized functions, such as the iPod or a cell phone.

      My memory is reaching back to those digital wrist watches that were popular in the late 1970s/ early 1980s. The ones with the built-in calculator, and the 12- or 16- key input pad. You remember them - the ones that you had to find a match, or a pencil tip, to press the keys with.
      Point made - even tiny, simple interfaces have a definite minimum size. For finger-tip operation, you need a bit less than 1 square cm per key.
      I've used a Psion (5 series) for nearly a decade now, and that's the smallest keyboard that I'm even vaguely comfortable using. I gather that those black emaily-telephone-combination things are just about usable, and I think their keypads are slightly smaller. I can't see that you'll get much smaller.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. "Review" misses the point. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For those who were wondering - yes, the summary is a troll. For those who missed it:
    and almost as many crashes as an unpatched Win98 install.
    1) Since when was their a patch for Win98 that stopped it from crashing? (apart from this patch)

    2) And - the review did not mention the O/S crashing - just applications crashing. Linux is not the problem here.

    Anyway, on to the meat:

    Nokia's 770 platform is only just starting. The 770 is available for retail sale, but not really intended for the general public.

    There's an upcoming release of the linux derived O/S it runs (in 2006) and Nokia are actively courting developers. (including discounts for gnome hackers)

    I say kudos to nokia - they're (as the review shows) releasing a cool bit of hardware kit and they're going to let the software developement community (both free, open & proprietary) fill in lots of gaps. I hope it works out.

    Oh - and rereading the review - it appears the reviewer's "biggest complaint" was the lack of keyboard. That's what seperates a tablet from a tiny laptop retard
    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:"Review" misses the point. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh - and rereading the review - it appears the reviewer's "biggest complaint" was the lack of keyboard.

      I'll tell you what -- I use a fairly excellent mobile device for my daily needs (it has basically replaced my need for a laptop and I rarely use my desktop). The biggest draw is that it has a full Qwerty keyboard that, while being very small, I can easily use to communicate easily.

      If I'm going to move to a device like the Nokia 770, I would *expect* that it have a hidden/retractable keyboard that I could easily use when I wasn't just pointing and clicking on links or scribbling a quick note.

      If no keyboard is what seperates a tablet from the rest of the exceptional mobile devices out there these days (including my Sidekick) then I'll stick with what I have and wait for EDGE/wifi support.

    2. Re:"Review" misses the point. by spiritraveller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The 770 is available for retail sale, but not really intended for the general public.

      If you sell it to the general public, then you are intending that they will buy it.

      The fact that it is open source should NEVER be an excuse for putting out a buggy retail product.

    3. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Lord_Pain · · Score: 1

      Oh - and rereading the review - it appears the reviewer's "biggest complaint" was the lack of keyboard. That's what seperates a tablet from a tiny laptop retard

      And maybe that is really the problem. The industry keeps pushing tablets and no one really wants one.

      Nokia's 770 platform is only just starting. The 770 is available for retail sale, but not really intended for the general public.

      This is just funny. If it is Retail then it is for the General public. So Nokia will have to deal with negative response. Nokia does not make cool hardware anymore. They make blunders. If you need convincing look at both N-Gage designs.

      I note the irony of your Handle.

      --
      -- What's this '-r *' file doing here? -- Oh well, a simple 'rm' should do the trick.
    4. Re:"Review" misses the point. by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

      Oh - and rereading the review - it appears the reviewer's "biggest complaint" was the lack of keyboard. That's what seperates a tablet from a tiny laptop retard

      Correct you are, but it should also be noted that a well-done tablet shouldn't make the user feel the need for a keyboard. IF a tablet PC is developed with good software and a good interface, then one wouldn't generally think to need a keyboard for input, rather the user would find the handwriting input system suitable and easy-to-use, which apparently isn't the case for the 770. If I were using the 770, I shoudln't expect to need a keyboard, but if the device's input system sucks then I'm going to hope that there is some alternative which, aside from the 'cramped onscreen keyboard,' there isn't. If your product leaves users clammoring for a keyboard device then you should probably reconsider 1) your available acessories or 2) your user input interface.

    5. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Jaffa · · Score: 3, Informative

      It also seems he was switching it on and off every time he wanted to use it, rather than using the rather nifty built-in power management. Either leave it alone (or give it a clue by sliding its cover on) and it'll slow the processor, shut down devices and the screen and save battery.

      In this "close to standby" it awakes instantly and lasts a week or so between recharges.

    6. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux sucks. Get a Mac ...

    7. Re:"Review" misses the point. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Need to set a few things straight, it appears...

      1) Since when was their a patch for Win98 that stopped it from crashing? (apart from this patch)

      It's bad enough that the submitter is guilty of pointless M$-bashing...you jumping on the bandwagon isn't really all that helpful....what madt you think it would be?

      2) And - the review did not mention the O/S crashing - just applications crashing. Linux is not the problem here.

      From TFA:

      In two weeks of testing, it locked up and spontaneously rebooted more often than any computer I've used in that time.
      You receive an F for reading comprehension, Whiney (assuming you actually took the trouble to read the entire article).

      Oh - and rereading the review - it appears the reviewer's "biggest complaint" was the lack of keyboard. That's what seperates a tablet from a tiny laptop retard

      Disregarding for just a moment what a 'tiny laptop retard' might me, two things:
      1. That was hardly the reviewer's 'biggest complaint'. The lack of a viable input option was just one of a whole laundry list you would have seen if you had done more than skim the article (again, F for reading comprehension).

      2. The lack of a viable input option is a valid complaint, regardless of whether or not you want to classify this device as a 'laptop' or a 'tablet'. It doesn't matter what you call it...if you can't use it effectively, I call it a paperweight.
      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    8. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And - the review did not mention the O/S crashing - just applications crashing. Linux is not the problem here.

      Read down to:

      The Nokia 770 takes longer to boot up than some desktop computers (nearly a minute) and offers battery life no longer than that of many laptops (4 1/4 hours of nearly continuous browsing). In two weeks of testing, it locked up and spontaneously rebooted more often than any computer I've used in that time.
      Admittedly, that comes after multiple problems of applications crashing separately, which is why you may have missed it.

      I say kudos to nokia - they're (as the review shows) releasing a cool bit of hardware kit and they're going to let the software developement community (both free, open & proprietary) fill in lots of gaps. I hope it works out.

      Oh, yeah -- this is fantastic! It may be buggy and useless as it's currently sold, but the important thing is that they're giving discounts to GNOME developers who will hopefully then fix it for them! I'd better buy one right now!

    9. Re:"Review" misses the point. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Oh - and rereading the review - it appears the reviewer's "biggest complaint" was the lack of keyboard. That's what seperates a tablet from a tiny laptop retard
      No, the digitizer screen that you can write on is what separates a tablet from a tiny laptop. It can still have a keyboard and be a tablet!

      And believe me, the difference matters -- there's many "tiny laptops" around, but almost zero tiny tablets, especially ones with keyboards!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    10. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well Newtons haven't been updated in 8 years and we're still waiting for something different...

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    11. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Disregarding for just a moment what a 'tiny laptop retard' might me, two things:

      I find it mildly amusing that you point out my lack of comma and in the same sentence make a far larger mistake.

      You receive an F for reading comprehension, Whiney

      Call me whiney all you like - at least I don't flame people for a simple mistake.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    12. Re:"Review" misses the point. by arcdx · · Score: 1
      Nokia's 770 platform is only just starting. The 770 is available for retail sale, but not really intended for the general public.

      I guess other people have mentioned it's weird to say something is for sale but not intended for the general public. I mean, if you had to go to some special website or a fringe store and give a secret password, maybe I'd understand, but a quick look shows that it's on the shelves at 4 of the 5 CompUSA stores near where I live. A friend notes that it's also on the shelves at Fry's.

      If a product isn't intended for the general public, maybe they should, like, make it harder for the general public to get. All they've done on that front is make it cost $400 (which I must admit is pretty effective to keep me away).

    13. Re:"Review" misses the point. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Hopefully Nokia execs will read this.

      Bundle the 770 with that E61, and you will have a dynamic duo.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    14. Re:"Review" misses the point. by rizzle · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried out the 770 but I've been a long time fan of Nokia and their products. However I currently have the Nokia 9300 (usa version here), and it suffers the *exact* problem which TFA describes with regards to Opera crashing. Granted my nokia does not run Linux (it's series 80 symbian software), but I find it interesting that Opera crashes on both systems with moderatly complex website or if you have multiple windows open for a long time. I thought it was because of the flaky EDGE signal I am getting (and it still could be that), but I think Opera is partially to blame for the lackluster internet browsing experience.

    15. Re:"Review" misses the point. by MCraigW · · Score: 2, Interesting
      2) And - the review did not mention the O/S crashing - just applications crashing. Linux is not the problem here.

      Here is what the article did say: "In two weeks of testing, it locked up and spontaneously rebooted more often than any computer I've used in that time."

      In my opinion, if a computer locks up, or spontaneously reboots, or crashes, it is indeed the fault of the operating system.

      Saying that it is not the fault of the O/S is like Microsoft saying that bluescreens aren't the fault of the O/S, they are the fault of those nasty third party applications and drivers.

      A good O/S shouldn't dump or hang, no matter what the applications do. It should just allow the application to blow up, and protect other running applications.

    16. Re:"Review" misses the point. by n6mod · · Score: 1

      FWIW, the keyboard on the 770 is an order of magnitude better than any onscreen keyboard I've ever used. It's not as fast as a thumbboard, but it's faster than t9, at least for me. And MUCH better than PocketPC/CE/Palm/Newton keyboards.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    17. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      As for me 'flaming' you for a 'simple mistake', exactly which mistake are you referencing?

      Which mistake was I referencing? I bolded it for you! (and you have the gall to accuse me of a lack of reading comprehension)requesite

      Here's the mistake for you: Disregarding for just a moment what a 'tiny laptop retard' might me.....

      Seeing you didn't see the bolding last time, I'll point out you spelt the word "mean" with only half the needed letters (and that was simply the most glaring of a number of errors you made in your post)

      WMF: Call me whiney all you like.

      TMM: Since that's what you've chosen to call yourself [slashdot.org], I will, thanks.


      Cripes! And you tell me that I can't see a joke! (You seem completely bamboozled - do you understand humour?)

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    18. Re:"Review" misses the point. by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1
      I'll tell you what -- I use a fairly excellent mobile device for my daily needs (it has basically replaced my need for a laptop and I rarely use my desktop). The biggest draw is that it has a full Qwerty keyboard that, while being very small, I can easily use to communicate easily.


      Which mobile would that be? You have my interest.
    19. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Limecron · · Score: 1

      If its' hardware is wonky, is it still OS's fault?

      That said, I don't see where the OP got that anyone blamed Linux in the first place. Poorly written kernel-level drivers or unreliable hardware will destabalize any OS.

    20. Re:"Review" misses the point. by garcia · · Score: 1

      If no keyboard is what seperates a tablet from the rest of the exceptional mobile devices out there these days (including my Sidekick) then I'll stick with what I have and wait for EDGE/wifi support.

    21. Re:"Review" misses the point. by masdog · · Score: 1

      Everyone also needs to remember that this is a first-gen device. Its not going to work perfectly, and it is going to have its little quirks and bugs that will get worked out as it is revised. Many of the problems, like battery life and the Wi-fi troubles, will be worked out, and the software and UI will improve.

    22. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Nokia's 770 platform is only just starting. [newsforge.com] The 770 is available for retail sale, but not really intended for the general public.

      There's an upcoming release of the linux derived O/S it runs (in 2006) and Nokia are actively courting developers. (including discounts for gnome hackers)

      I say kudos to nokia - they're (as the review shows) releasing a cool bit of hardware kit and they're going to let the software developement community (both free, open & proprietary) fill in lots of gaps. I hope it works out.


      This is a poor excuse, and one that Linux proponents are too quick to use. The fact is that most consumers don't care what the platform is and care even less what the product roadmap is. What they care about is how well the thing they just bought works.

      Now in some ways this review is a hachet job. Really, I like keyboards and all, but plenty of PDAs come without them and it's considered a design choice, not a fatal flaw. Also, many of those PDAs won't get much more than 4.5 hours of constant use before the battery says goodbye.

      But application crashes? Long boot times? Once again, forget the platform and forget the roadmap. If it were Windows Mobile, what would you be saying? Yeah, that's what I thought.

      Linux people need to get used to one fact and they need to get used to it fast. The stuff better work well, without excuses or promises for the future, if they want consumers to use it. Otherwise it's just some broken shit that doesn't deserve the light of day.

      TW

    23. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, let me say I *LOVE* Linux. However, I think it might be wise to look at this article objectively. Anytime someone has a complaint about something (Linux, let's say), instead of seeing as an attack on something that you love, see it as the areas the might need improvemet.

      Until a few months ago, the most recent version of MS Windows that I was using was 98 with most recent "updates/patches". The OS was fairly stable, believe it or not, but apps were allowed to hose my memory every now and then, causing the regular rebooting. I did fix this problem by installing Ubuntu, after not having used Linux since 1996.

      What I found was relieving and appalling. My OS was now completely stable, and my hardware performs much better when the apps are working. However, the standard of quality of applications in the OSS world is very near atrocious. I'm surprised at what people are willing to "offer" to the world and have their name associated with. I'm even more surprised that distros will choose to bundle broken apps for the default application.

      Just one example, Totem is the default media player with the Ubuntu distro that I installed. It crashes when an item is added to the playlist, and this is a known issue. In the shrink-wrap world, this product would have never been released; or if it had, no sane manufacturer would have bundled it with their computers.

      In fact, I have had so many apps under Linux (several distros) crash, that I can easily say that my Win98 install was more stable for most of it's life than the few months that I've used Ubuntu and Fedora Core 5.

      Again, I love Linux, Open Source, and Free Beer. But if the quality is going to remain this much lower than the rest of the software world, I'd rather pay for beer and have it not taste like skunk. I think this article is addressing just that. Raise the quality so there's no room/reason for anyone to complain. Release when it's ready, or don't code at all.

    24. Re:"Review" misses the point. by toadlife · · Score: 1

      "If its' hardware is wonky, is it still OS's fault?"

      If Windows is involved, yes. If linux, no.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    25. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah -- this is fantastic! It may be buggy and useless as it's currently sold, but the important thing is that they're giving discounts to GNOME developers who will hopefully then fix it for them! I'd better buy one right now!

      I love the discount offer - 500 Euros (with a planned shipping price of $350).

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    26. Re:"Review" misses the point. by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when was their a patch for Win98 that stopped it from crashing?

      Not to nit pick or to even suggest a defense of Win98, but it was fairly stable for the OS it was, not having a kernel like NT.

      Win98 and mainstream applications is pretty crash free. The problem with Win98 is that it, even more than Win2k or WinXP lets third party software screw with the system, and due to the nature of the Win9X kernel technology, there is no protect from bad applications, from protecting system files to not fully controlling errant memory allocation in the driver mechanism.

      If you have a Win98 machine and it is crashing, you have crap third party apps, or a crap driver.

      Now for WinME, it was just bad software and is one of the few mainstream OSes our labs ever worked with that could drop to a crawl and crash from a base installation using MS controlled drivers and MS applications. (WinME tried to jam in some new stuff and didn't take time to work it out, nor did MS have the foresight to rip some of these features when they realized the Win9X kernel could not efficiently handle the new features. - A feature like system restore just did not work well when it wasn't sitting on a solid NT kernel, and in WinXP is an elegant feature in comparison.)

      Now in regard to the article, people shouldn't take it either way, it is not a bash of Linux nor a bash of portable PCs. Believe it or not Linux is not perfect, and on a non well tested port, there are going to be bugs, it happens. Just like WinCE was a variant of the NT kernel, yet the early versions crashed.

      Consider this growing pains for Linux, and see it as a good thing. Also consider this as growing pains for the small PC format. Even the new WindowsXP based systems will show the same complaints and even if it was 100% crash free, apps are going to crash, there will be hardware failures, it will be too warm for some people, the screen will be too tiny for a lot of people.

      You can't please everyone with products like this, it is just Linux is the name on it taking part of the wrap.

      I noticed posts above that talked about the need for keyboards and how they won't ever work in these formats, etc etc... There are a LOT of portable technologies that are still not cost effective, but out there and being refinded. From a projected keyboard with motion and video sensors to see what the person is typing, to gloves, etc.

      Display technologies are also getting there, and the screen on these unit will come to a point they disappear. Look for low power projectors to display the device on a wall or seat, and we all know about LCD glasses, and even Retinal Laser Displays that will let use use glasses or a peep hole into super tiny devices.

      The current units DO fit the CURRENT needs, and as the technology continues to mature, will disappear into wearable full blown computing. PDAs with lower powered OSes are over, and we will continue to see some growing pains, but we have pretty much made the jump as this product and others are demonstrating.

    27. Re:"Review" misses the point. by mykdavies · · Score: 2, Informative

      spelt (chiefly Brit.) past and past participle of spell(1).

      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
    28. Re:"Review" misses the point. by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      I agree TFA was at best a troll. He could have summed it up in a few lines, "I like WindowsCE because on my summer vacation...."

      Maemo http://www.maemo.org/is an open source project/distro. A very active one.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    29. Re:"Review" misses the point. by 51mon · · Score: 1

      > If you have a Win98 machine and it is crashing, you have crap third party apps, or a crap driver.

      Windows 98 (and Windows 95) did have some serious issues unrelated to third party applications. For example the dial-up software shipped with it was quite capable of corrupting itself in hideous ways (writing all over its own config files was one favourite trick). Don't anyone mention the famed 49.7 days bug, although technically that was a "crap driver" I suppose, it wasn't a third party driver.

      If you have an OS that doesn't protect itself from rogue applications, it doesn't matter who wrote the application, merely what they wrote. I had similar issues with Netware 3, and Novell NLMs that crashed servers, because there was no proper process protection.

      Just as I stopped running the Novell NLMs that caused our servers to crash, people learnt to live with Windows 95/98, because in other regards it met their needs (I know I ran Windows 95 for 11 years because it was good enough). Alas a whole generation now thinks it is relatively normal for "computers" to be unreliable, need rebooting for cosmetic changes etc.

      My desktop box just had the entire graphical desktop, and every graphical application uninstalled, and reinstalled (long story), no reboots required, no OS hangs. Throughout this rather irritating (and unusual) episode it continued to serve email, files, and other minor services to other machines on the local network without even a hiccup, as well as utilising the Internet to install the relevant versions of the software that were being sorted out. However I appreciate this experience is likely to be very different from that of the majority of computer users, it illustrates the power and potential of proper layering and isolation of software components.

    30. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a Sidekick - it broke. My friend had a Sidekick too. It also broke. The Sidekick would be a great device if it wasn't built out of complete crap.

    31. Re:"Review" misses the point. by masterzora · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I agree with most of what you say, there's just one thing I have to point out that makes you look really stupid:
      http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/spelt

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    32. Re:"Review" misses the point. by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      If you have an OS that doesn't protect itself from rogue applications,

      Yes, but be fair for a moment and think this out...

      Win 3.1 - Networking was NOT the norm, it was the exception for these system to even be hooked up to each other.

      Win95 was built from this closed system concept, and even though it added winsock and native TCP/IP, it was developed in 1993-1995 when security was keeping people from logging in, and VERY LITTLE NETWORKING. So much, that NT 4.0 Professional was installed in Office environments more than Win95 was.

      These Win9X and DOS/Win3.x OSes and OS/Environments were designed around a closed system model of the time. In 1995 when Win95 shipped, even MSN was not a WEB SITE, it was a group of folders inside Win95. And that was a closed system, much like AOL and Compuserve of the time was, so there was little way for it to even be a target from the 'internet'.

      Even Win98 was not 'redesigned' with a security layer, heck one truly didn't even exist in Win98 at the time, if you wanted Security you bought WinNT, PERIOD.

      These OSes were never designed be used heavily in environments that were not 'closed' networks or standalone.

      So it is easy to go back and pick on these OSes, almost 10 years old for not having a proper kernel technology or a security layer, etc etc.... But for the TIMEPERIOD they did what they were designed to, even if wasn't perfectly.

      Security was something MS was aware of, it was the design foundation of WinNT (irony uh?), but the Internet was a pretty loose variable during these years, especially when you facter in the TCP/IP exploitable problems that came along with it, and the emerging HOME full time broadband access.

      I really didn't want to be the champion of Win98, but I should have been a bit more clear. For the time it was a fairly solid OS, much better than Win95 but nothing on the scale of advanced OS technologies like NT or Linux. It just wasn't designed to be much more than a slight evolution to a closed OS model.

      Also if you look at other OSes from the time OS/2, to System 8/7, they were also very 'closed' system designed. They also were prone to crashes, especially with the poor memory management fights on System 7/8 or the locked queue on the OS/2 that would let one application's input queue suspend the entire OS.

      But these companies learned and either evolved or took another route, OSX is a pretty good example of a migration of a 'closed' OS technology to a one that is robust enought to offer stability and security. Try to paint the Win98 to WinXp move in the same regard, both are as drastic of a change.

      Even look at Linux from the 1994-1998 time period, it wasn't exactly as stable as it is now, nor as secure as it is now. 10 years is a LONG time.

      Sorry you ran Win95 for so long, you probably would have saved yourself some headaches by moving to NT or even Win2k if you were locked into Windows. I had the luxury of being in the Win2k beta, so I was actually running it before Win98 was even out of beta.

      For what they were Win9X, especially Win98 being the most diverse and stable from the Win9x pack, they were ok, just NOT great OSes...

      Thanks for your post, take care...

    33. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      In an earlier post, I asked you to debate the topic, or conserve bandwidth. I now extend that invitation to you again.

      *heh* Someone with your sig asking me to conserve bandwidth?

      You're so cute! :-) *ruffles TMM's hair*

      Oh - and thanks for your definition of spelt (even the American Heritage Dictionary agrees with my definition). Still I guess you're just aspiring to be a slashdot editor - so its not like spelling's going to be *really* important for you :-)

      Glad to see you've got so much time on your hands!

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    34. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second, unless by 'spelt' you're referring to an important wheat species in Europe from the Bronze Age to Roman times [wikipedia.org], you're making up words.

      Nice one, idiot.

    35. Re:"Review" misses the point. by garcia · · Score: 1

      The Sidekick II is much better than the CSK, I have only had to replace my SK2 twice instead of monthly like the CSK.

    36. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      So what are they supposed to do? Check people's geek badge number?

      The Nokia 770 is for geeks who are willing to tweak it to do what they want. Another iteration or two and it will likely have evolved into something that "just works" for more average people. However, just because it isn't there now, doesn't mean that Nokia shouldn't sell it to people that can use it.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

    37. Re:"Review" misses the point. by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      Oh, my God. Please seek therapy.

      (I'm not kidding, it might do you some good.)

  3. Give me a fucking keyboard by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If it had a keyboard, I'd buy one right away. Without keyboard, what's it good for?

    The rest of the specs are weird, too; as the WaPo points out, why use RS-MMC? Full-sized MMC fit in my 6230i phone, why could'nt they fit in a device 4 times bigger? It's like chewbacca: it does -NOT- make sense!

    1. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > Without keyboard, what's it good for?

      Web browsing, making phone calls, checking your cases in RT, checking in on your servers, pinging machines from the field, etc., etc.

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Get a bluetooth keyboard.
      2. RS-MMC? I found a 2 gig one for under $100 so that doesnt seem to bad.

      Actually this could make a LOT of sense. It has bluetooth. Combine it with your cell and you have internet access everywhere.
      It has WiFi. I go to a few places that have free wifi but I never use it. I do have a notebook but it is too heavy to carry with me every where. I could see me using this at those locations.

      This could be a very nice little device. I could see it as an ideal car computer. What it does seem to lack is a USB host port :( If I could get one of those then all sorts of interesting uses pop to mind.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by onecheapgeek · · Score: 1
      > Without keyboard, what's it good for?

      Web browsing, making phone calls, checking your cases in RT, checking in on your servers, pinging machines from the field, etc., etc.

      So basically.... Everything you can do on a normal cellphone or TREO, except you can say it runs Linux, even though there ien't a single application you've cited that requires it. Now I understand.

    4. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everything you can do on a normal cellphone or TREO"

      Uh, have you ever tried to actually view real websites on your phone? I've got a Treo right here and I wouldn't wish the task of extracting information from a site like slashdot or cnn.com on a monkey on a rock. 320x320 is just not enough pixels. Besides that, Blazer is kind of shitty.

    5. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by mikeisme77 · · Score: 1

      Correct on all accounts EXCEPT making phone calls. Despite being made by Nokia, their tablet is not a phone--nor would I want it to be... Personally, I would buy it too if it had a keyboard (more storage would be nice too, but really the biggest drawback is no keyboard--some things are just easier with a keyboard and I'm a big proponent of tablet/pen technologies).

    6. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by cultrhetor · · Score: 1

      Why do we continually assume that we can pour affordances from container to container without affecting the ways in which they must be used? A half keyboard would have worked fairly well - the machine is obviously not meant to substitute for the computer.

      --
      "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    7. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by Jupix · · Score: 1

      If it had a keyboard, I'd buy one right away. Without keyboard, what's it good for?

      Anything a tablet PC is good for. Want a keyboard? Buy a laptop (or an external keyboard, for that matter...)

    8. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      What it does seem to lack is a USB host port :( If I could get one of those then all sorts of interesting uses pop to mind.

      It does have a USB port, and this can be put into host mode using the utility that flashes the firmware. The only slight problem is that it is unpowered. If you have USB devices that don't draw power from the port, then they might work. Failing that, there is a hack to connect a 9V battery to the pins of an adaptor cable and use that. Someone did this to use a USB keyboard with the device.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by SirGeek · · Score: 1

      The rest of the specs are weird, too; as the WaPo points out, why use RS-MMC? Full-sized MMC fit in my 6230i phone, why could'nt they fit in a device 4 times bigger? It's like chewbacca: it does -NOT- make sense!

      My Nokia phone has the RS-MMC in it . I'm betting your phone is older (i.e. 3 + years old) ? I think their new phones/devices are all using the RS-MMC cards. Why ? I bet they have lower power consumption than full sized cards.
    10. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay that could make things interesting. If you could hack that to a powered hub you could then interface it to all sorts of devices including an external hard drive for mass storage.
      Any chance of an audio in port hiding on that thing as well?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Any chance of an audio in port hiding on that thing as well?

      Not that I'm aware of, although it may be possible to connect a bluetooth headset to the device. I've not tried.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
      If it had a keyboard, I'd buy one right away. Without keyboard, what's it good for?It's like chewbacca: it does -NOT- make sense!

      Hmm, if Chewbacca lives on Endor, a TABLET should come with a KEYBOARD. Now this is what does NOT make sense.

      Seriously, it's a TABLET, which is generally a device that is supposed to be free of any large keyboard. This thing doesn't burn DVDs or make toast either, so buy a laptop or toaster if that's what you want.

      My Honda Civic's off-road capabilities are disappointing, too, but guess what? It wasn't designed to leave paved roads very often.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    13. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I was going to assume the bluetooth audio as an option. With an audio in you could have it switch between multiple audio sources using the USB to control the switching matrix.
      I was thinking of a device that would interface say to an XM radio, FM radio, and radar detector and selectively feed them into the bluetooth head set.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    14. Re:Give me a fucking keyboard by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      why use RS-MMC?

      Support for 1.8V operation instead of 3.3V.

  4. Windows user reviews Linux by babbling · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This review sounds a bit like a Windows user reviewing Linux. This Nokia 770 device runs a modified version of Debian, and is an ARM architecture. While Nokia couldn't bundle something like MPlayer with it, there is nothing stopping anyone from getting a copy of MPlayer and using it to play all of the different formats/codecs that the reviewer has had a whinge about it not being able to play.

    For geeks, this seems to be a good device! For Rob Pegoraro, it sucks, because it won't run Windows Media Player. Poor baby.

    1. Re:Windows user reviews Linux by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0, Troll
      I use Windows mostly, I've played with Linux. The 770 still doesn't work for "me". Yup, you can play around and install many Linux apps, however, over at maemo you can get a choice of a couple of old games and command line linux apps. W00t! Shiny!

      His complaints about battery life, screen size and wierd wireless behavior are pretty spot on. Unless you want to buy a little tiny computerlet to hack Linux (which is why I bought it), it's a pretty lame little device.

      I doubt there are enough Linux geeks with good eyesight and a couple of hundred dollars in disposable cash to make the 770 a commercial success.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Windows user reviews Linux by TheJediGeek · · Score: 0

      That's a good point. It's VERY unclear about how easy it is to install other software. The tone in TFA made it sound like you had to use whatever it came with, but it would seem that the whole point of running some type of linux would be to allow other software to be loaded on it. The dude complains about being unable to open Word or Excel files. Wouldn't it be possible to load OpenOffice onto it? If it's possible to load SW packages, or even compile from source, then it would be a VERY useful device for geeks.

    3. Re:Windows user reviews Linux by nacturation · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not that I'd expect you to read the article, but the criticisms he has against it are far more than it just won't play Windows Media Player formats:

      "The Nokia 770 takes longer to boot up than some desktop computers (nearly a minute) and offers battery life no longer than that of many laptops (4 1/4 hours of nearly continuous browsing). In two weeks of testing, it locked up and spontaneously rebooted more often than any computer I've used in that time."

      The "unpatched Windows 98" jab must be from some Linux fanboy who inserted that. It doesn't appear in the article. The only mention of Windows Media Player is in a one sentence paragraph:

      "You won't have much better luck with streaming media online because of the lack of playback software for Windows Media and QuickTime formats."

      He also mentions the lack of a decent Flash player and comments that it won't play a lot of Flash content that's commonly out there. Maybe it is a good device for geeks who don't mind overlooking its myriad problems and coping with the challenges, incompatibilities, and crashes. And maybe some kernel developer will take a look at the code and work out the reliability issues. However, for the intended audience of that article -- consumers -- the review was spot on.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Windows user reviews Linux by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be possible to load OpenOffice onto it?

      Good luck getting OO.o to run on a device that has 64MB or RAM and no swap...

      AbiWord and GNUmeric are both available for download, although the port of AbiWord doesn't read word documents. Installing apps from the web is trivial; click to download, say open, and then click yes a couple of times.

      Of course, the correct solution would be to save the document as a PDF and read that on the device...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Windows user reviews Linux by dioscaido · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Comments like these are why linux hasn't yet broken in the consumer main-stream. The reviewer says the main apps on the device (opera, mail client) seem to crash all the time. Add to that the apparent platform instability (os crashes too) and, yes, the apparent lack of a media player, and it's *not* a good consumer device.

      Yes, we could probably load onto it a more stable kernel version, and better apps, but what consumer would do that? Linux advocates should be pissed that this device gives such a bad impression of the platform.

    6. Re:Windows user reviews Linux by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I disagree. I very much doubt Nokia had a handful of Linux geeks in mind when they produced this. I expect they were thinking of a slick consumer oriented device where no one cares what operating system is underneath.

      I know from experience with PDAs that I couldn't give a damned what OS is powering it. The important question is whether it works or not. Is the PIM software idiot proof, simple to use and reliable? Thus, I still think the old PalmOS was a better PIM that Windows CE / Pocket / Mobile, even though PalmOS is a piece of crap underneath. It's because the PIM software works great. Same for phones - my Sony Ericsson phone uses Symbian I think but really I don't care.

      The mentality that Linux means "fix it yourself" has to be stamped out. Linux is just an OS and an extremely powerful one at that. It should be eminantly feasible to produce a fantastic handheld device which just so happens to be Linux underneath as well. That way every one is happy. Consumers for having decent device and geeks for something to play with. It's not like Nokia is new to this. They've been producing set top boxes around Linux for years. Perhaps they need to get someone from their design and QA groups to beat the engineers around the head with a clue bat if they still haven't got the message. No one is going to buy a tablet with broken software.

  5. But... by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1

    it runs Linux!

    1. Re:But... by kc0re · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah! Okay, it's cool then ;)

  6. More uses for 770 by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 3, Informative

    Someone has ported GPS over to 770 and now combined with a bluetooth GPS receiver it acts as a gps decive showing maps etc. There are plans for VOIP support soon. Combine this with FON router and you are on online at many places and make free calls, check email etc. I was thinking on the lines of hacking this into a car. There is already GPS available, so why not hook it up with car stereo and double it as an mp3 player. And if you have a FON account every time you drive by a FON location it downloads your email.. missed calls etc. This can be pretty interesting. Any thoughts ?

    1. Re:More uses for 770 by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 1

      OOps forgot to add the links
      Porting GPS to 770
      FON

    2. Re:More uses for 770 by un1xl0ser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is really cool, but to quote one of your links -- "Until a vector map solution is available, GPS use on the Nokia 770 tablet will be recreatonal at best." That about sums it up. The size is right for that, the on-screen keyboard can be changed, lots of things can be fixed ... but until there is either a free or non-free vector based GPS solution, it will just be a toy.

      This is worth looking at:
      http://linuxadvocate.org/projects/roadster

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    3. Re:More uses for 770 by RosenSama · · Score: 1

      How will it do VOIP w/o a microphone?

    4. Re:More uses for 770 by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 1

      we will attach a head set to it.. just like a computer

    5. Re:More uses for 770 by dago · · Score: 1

      Yeah, less functionnalities than actual mobile phones.

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    6. Re:More uses for 770 by RosenSama · · Score: 1

      How? There's no microphone jack and by default it's a usb client. Will you reflash the device in USB host mode and use a USB mic with the correct adapter? Of course then you can't attach it as a flash drive, right? A bluetooth microphone?

  7. passwords, courtesy of bugmenot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Username: mobb@deep.com
    password: mobbdeep

    http://bugmenot.com/view.php?url=washingtonpost.co m

    if those don't work

    1. Re:passwords, courtesy of bugmenot by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Bugmenot is blocked by the USAF as a "Criminal Skills" site, while the Washington Post is just blocked.
      Thank goodness I can still get Fox News.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:passwords, courtesy of bugmenot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bugmenot is blocked by the USAF ... while the Washington Post is just blocked. Thank goodness I can still get Fox News.

      The US Government is operating off the belief, "No news is good news." Proof that the Fox Network is truly 'Faux News' ...

  8. youu dont know how to use one by xshader · · Score: 4, Informative

    keyboard? get a bluetooth keyboard.

    crashing? dont load mega-websites on a machine with sixty-four megs of ram. lots of sites work fine.

    does little? there are tons of emerging third party apps emerging... did that guy even check the maemo wiki page?

    most useful third party app on the seven-seventy is fbreader. lets you read any txt files rotated or not, large/small fonts and so on. most of your standard ebook features are there.

    another useful app is the xterminal. if you ever use ssh to connect to remote sites to do stuff, you'll find this xterm-in-your-pocket highly useful.

    1. Re:youu dont know how to use one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fairly obvious that he didn't check the maemo site.

      Why would he?

      Is he a tinkerer? Is he trying to review the thing for Joe Average or for happy hackers?

    2. Re:youu dont know how to use one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      keyboard? get a bluetooth keyboard.

      Doesn't that defeat the whole portability thing?

      crashing? dont load mega-websites on a machine with sixty-four megs of ram. lots of sites work fine.

      You have to be kidding me. If this were a review for a pc running windoze, you'd be all "that os sucks". How about the manufacturer creating a device that can gracefully handle situations that exceed it's capacity. Not loading (or fully loading) web pages is one thing, crashing and locking up are totally unacceptable when you are using the device for it's main purpose.

      does little? there are tons of emerging third party apps emerging...

      That's nice, one day it may have useful stuff. I hear M$ has tons of security enhancements to Windoze emerging too.

      most useful third party app on the seven-seventy is fbreader.

      That's great if you want, yet another, portable ebook reader. Pretty useless if not.

      another useful app is the xterminal.

      Now there is something that is useful. Though with the lack of kb, it's true usefulness is lacking. That and other products do the exact same thing.

    3. Re:youu dont know how to use one by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough none of these issues are problems with Windows mobile 2003, and WM5...

    4. Re:youu dont know how to use one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or get a Treo and not have any of these problems to begin with. Small screen, yes, but it works, and works now/tomorrow/for the past year...

    5. Re:youu dont know how to use one by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1
      dont load mega-websites on a machine with sixty-four megs of ram. lots of sites work fine.
      If it crashes, it must be user error, right?
      --
      "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
    6. Re:youu dont know how to use one by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      crashing? dont load mega-websites on a machine with sixty-four megs of ram. lots of sites work fine.

      Still, it shouldn't crash the application or cause the kernel to want to kill the application. The application should refuse to do the operation requested when malloc() fails -- and malloc() should fail (I hate overcommit).

      --
      Rod Taylor
    7. Re:youu dont know how to use one by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      Only a mere sixty-four megabytes of memory? 640KB is all you really need... Seriously, nothing on the web should crash a machine with 64MB of RAM. Get real. This is a toy, and a broken one at that. Third party apps? I remember the DaVinci...

    8. Re:youu dont know how to use one by hackstraw · · Score: 1


      Lets look at this thing.

      Its 141x79x19 mm in size or 5.5x3.1x3/4 inches for those metrically challenged.

      It weighs 230 grams or 0.5 lbs.

      This is beyond a male pocket item. Maybe a manpurse or womanpurse, but not my pocket.

      Does it make phone calls? Nope, still gotta carry your cellphone too. Does it do general purpose computing? No, it only has 64megs of RAM.

      For my remote needs, I've seen pine and ssh run on a much smaller Palm coupled to a cellphone. And even that was too much crap to lug around with me. If I need mobile computing, I'll stick to a notebook computer.

  9. Different strokes for different folks by N7DR · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I have seen several reviews of the N770 that for the most part come down "this device is no goo because it doesn't do X", for some value of X that the reviewer seemed to think vital.

    All I can say is that I finally saw one of these about three weeks ago, and immediately (as in, next day) went to CompUSA and bought one. I love it. It does exactly what I want, and the only complaint I have is the lack of software -- but that will be quickly solved as the community ports apps to it. www.maemo.org is very active.

    So it does what I want, and I think it's great. Obviously, if it doesn't do what you want, you'll think it's awful/pointless/a waste of money.

    It has replaced my Zaurus (and has the added benefit that the form factor is almost identical to the Zaurus, so I can even use the same case for the N770).

    1. Re:Different strokes for different folks by Jaffa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, one of the ironies is that it *does* do X (including acting as an X server for remote apps ;-))

    2. Re:Different strokes for different folks by ztella · · Score: 1

      Yea this is not a PDA, it is an internet tablet and it performs merely as such. It is limited to that aspect. Some of these reviewers expect this to be something like a Origami computer. Instead this is something that does one thing and it does it pretty well (sometimes a little slowly). If you want to surf the net on the toilet or while chilling watching TV too lazy to change the TV to HTPC, this is a great device because it lets you get to the net quickly and if thats all you want to do then you'll be satisfied.

      --
      Always Outnumbered... Never Outgunned
    3. Re:Different strokes for different folks by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

      What advantages did you find in this device over your Zaurus (and which model of Zaurus)? I still love my SL-5500 as a jack-of-all-trades, carry-everywhere computer, but I've been thinking of upgrading to one of the newer Japanese models. Those are much pricier than this Nokia unit though... Is there anything you miss about the Zaurus since you've switched?

    4. Re:Different strokes for different folks by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Read the review. From what I saw, his MAIN complaint is that it froze and spontaneously reboot often, had poor battery life, and a relatively long boot time. Nothing to do with features it lacks.

      You're completely glossing over these issues. Does yours display the same problems or not? If so, how is the reviewer wrong or misleading in any way?

    5. Re:Different strokes for different folks by N7DR · · Score: 1
      It was a Z-5500. The big advantage of the N770 to me was that this has a real web browser in it, and has built-in wifi (i.e., the very things that it's advertised to have).

      The downside is the poor PIM software -- but on the other hand, I never found any decent PIM software for the Z either. I loaded our corporate contact list on to the Z (running Opie). And now it takes 24 (count 'em... 24) seconds just to open the Contact list.

      I have every hope that the GPE PIM suite is going to evolve to be a lot more usable than the PIM software on the Z. There are a couple of programs on my Z that I miss, but again it's early days for the N770, and I have reasonable expectations that usable substitutes will appear in due course. Neither device is perfect (some sort of combination of the two would be awfully close to perfect), but of the two I much prefer the N770.

      One real bonus for the N770: if one misses a program, there's a good chance that a web-based substitute will be available. Not a perfect solution, but workable until the application base for the N770 expands a bit.

      I fully expect the successor to the N770 to be a really dynamite machine, assuming that Nokia doesn't just kill the line. But the N770 as-is is good enough for me not to want to wait for the next model.

    6. Re:Different strokes for different folks by N7DR · · Score: 2, Informative
      From what I saw, his MAIN complaint is that it froze and spontaneously reboot often, had poor battery life, and a relatively long boot time.

      I didn't understand these at all. I have had exactly one freeze/reboot -- immediately after installing a 512MB card and symlinking a bunch of system files so that they actually resided on the card instead of the N770's internal RAM. I did have a nasty moment when that reboot occurred, wondering if I'd broken something badly, but in fact after it rebooted everything was fine (and actually the instructions said to reboot anyway, so it's possible that it may even have been added to the install script to save one the effort of booting manually).

      So, apart from that one instance: no freezes, no reboots. Battery life is not great (like 3-4 hours browsing; but then I can't imagine why anyone would want to browse for an extended period with a pocket device anyway).

      Boot time is quite long -- but then how often does one reboot? I've only done it about three times while messing around with hacky sorts of things, and under normal use I don't know why one would want to reboot.

      So I'm really happy with mine. And BTW it does take standard cellphone batteries, so one can always carry a cheap spare if one wants to, although I really don't see the need.

  10. Easy to fix by perdelucena · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just plugin a thin USB or bluetooth keyboard and the problem is solved. Next question, please.

    1. Re:Easy to fix by MankyD · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Just plugin a thin USB or bluetooth keyboard and the problem is solved. Next question, please.
      That completely defeats the purpose of having a single portable device that you can carry with you. Next thing, you'll be telling me I have to carry a keyboard, mouse, printer, speakers, ethernet cable, portable optical drive, usb hard drive and a power cord. This is one of those things that is supposed to "just work".
      --
      -dave
      http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    2. Re:Easy to fix by perdelucena · · Score: 1

      People who use Palms use to carry keyboards like
      this on their wallets.

    3. Re:Easy to fix by MankyD · · Score: 1
      People who use Palms use to carry keyboards like this on their wallets.
      http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/stowaway-xt-review.ht ml
      Wonderful but I don't buy products like this just so that I have to go buy something else to make it useful. That should be choice not a requirement.
      --
      -dave
      http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    4. Re:Easy to fix by TheLongshot · · Score: 1
      Wonderful but I don't buy products like this just so that I have to go buy something else to make it useful. That should be choice not a requirement.

      Well, you either buy is seperately, or you pay for it as part of the cost for the product. Either way, you'd pay for it.

    5. Re:Easy to fix by MankyD · · Score: 1
      Well, you either buy is seperately, or you pay for it as part of the cost for the product. Either way, you'd pay for it.
      Correct! I paid for it when I bought the product. In this case, the product's keyboard has been deemed inadequate, however. So why exactly did I pay for it? I should not have to buy it a second time.
      --
      -dave
      http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    6. Re:Easy to fix by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 1

      Actually it doesn't defeat the purpose at all.

      If the product isn't doing what you want it to do, then that means you're trying to shoehorn the product into a role it's not designed for. I use a PDA for almost everything mobile now. It's not as good as a regular laptop in terms overall function, but it does 95% of what I need it for.

      That includes usually not using it for extended data input. PDAs were NEVER designed to be a data entry terminal. They were meant for occasional input, frequent output, like looking up contacts, etc.

      So for the vast majority of the time, that's what I use it for and the pen interface is perfectly adequate. Sometimes if I want to compose a lengthy email or something on it, I pull out my bluetooth keyboard. Everything works perfectly and I'm very satisfied with the setup.

      If this doesn't suit your work style, well then for the love of Dog *don't buy it*. But a product that suits your work style! It's idiotic to buy a product that doesn't satisfy the need you're buying it for.

    7. Re:Easy to fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, is there a reading comprehension issue here? you don't have to buy the external keyboard unless you would like to, no one's forcing you.

    8. Re:Easy to fix by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I guess the problem is that you didn't actualy buy it the first time. You bought what came with the product wich is designed for somethign other then what your intending to do. Sure you look at this thing and say I could do this with it. But evidently the manufacturers intended for it to do less or the intended it to be more of a chore to work that way. Thats why they made it the way they did. Now you have a choice, either put up with the "slow uneasy way" of inputing information or purchase another solution that extends the abilities to more of a data input device or something you are more comfortable with. I guess there is another choice, don't buyy any of it in the first place but if we are talking about having to by an extra keyboard, that decision has already be ruled out.

      This is more like looking at a device that says you can run linux on this and then being concerned that it take alot of work to get you particular brand working instead of the one that came with it.

    9. Re:Easy to fix by TheLongshot · · Score: 1

      From my understanding of the review, the keyboard is onscreen. So, no, you didn't pay for a HARDWARE keyboard, which would have added additional cost to the unit, where a software keyboard does not.

    10. Re:Easy to fix by MankyD · · Score: 1

      Right, but what the review is saying is that the on-screen keyboard is worthless and what the g-parent poster is saying is that you should just buy a separate keyboard. All I am trying to say is that I shouldn't have to buy a keyboard to make if functional.

      --
      -dave
      http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    11. Re:Easy to fix by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      So, no, you didn't pay for a HARDWARE keyboard, which would have added additional cost to the unit, where a software keyboard does not.

      So, all those guys who wrote the code for the software keyboard just did it for free?

      Be it hardware or software, the keyboard costs. If the software keyboard isn't adequate, I'm in the position of paying for product that doesn't work, which was the GP's point.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    12. Re:Easy to fix by MankyD · · Score: 1

      The review states clearly that the keyboard is inadequate for its intended purpose: "Its biggest flaw is the keyboard that Nokia left out. [...] That alone should sink anything built for constant Web and e-mail use." I am not trying to shoehorn it into anything.

      --
      -dave
      http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    13. Re:Easy to fix by kelnos · · Score: 1

      Well, it's really a matter of opinion. I own a Nokia 770, and while I wouldn't sing praises about the on-screen keyboard by any means, I find it adequate for my needs.

      What the grandparent (or great-grandparent, whatever) was pointing out is that, if Nokia were to bundle a hardware keyboard with the 770, its total cost to the buyer would increase to include the cost of the keyboard. And while buying a keyboard separately will probably cost a little more than the added price if it were included, you seem to be assuming/arguing that a hardware keyboard should be included more or less for free. That just doesn't make sense.

      The tablet is perfectly "functional" (as you seem to think it's not) as-is. Your problem with it is, well, your problem. If you don't like it, I'm sure you could have returned it within 30 days or more. If you don't own one, why are you complaining?

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    14. Re:Easy to fix by TheLongshot · · Score: 1
      So, all those guys who wrote the code for the software keyboard just did it for free?

      Not at all, but the per-unit cost was probably far less for the software solution Write it once, display everywhere.

      My point still stands. Like most handhelds, you have a stylus and a soft keyboard. If you don't like it, you can buy a seperate keyboard. If you wanted something with a keyboard, you'd be better off with some of the subcompacts, or tablets that came with keyboards. Course, it wouldn't be quite as portable as this thing.

    15. Re:Easy to fix by MankyD · · Score: 1

      I'm not complaining :) (and I don't own one.) I'm just pointing out that the great-great-great-etc-post claiming "Just plugin a thin USB or bluetooth keyboard..." is not what I would call an adequate response to the reviewer's complaints.

      --
      -dave
      http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    16. Re:Easy to fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Perhaps in the near future we will start to see built-in projectable keyboards such as this (http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/input/8193/) in our miniaturized mobile devices.

    17. Re:Easy to fix by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      That completely defeats the purpose of having a single portable device that you can carry with you.

      Having an expandible device gives you options.

      My Zaurus has a small built-in keyboard (as well as an on-screen one and handwriting reco for use in PDA mode, but I pretty much always open the clamshell for typing). It's usable for brief typing into the scheduler, or a quick remote login, and still handy to carry around.

      If I'm going down to the coffeehouse to do some writing, I pack along a foldable USB keyboard and plug it in. More to carry, but still smaller and lighter than my Vaio notebook.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    18. Re:Easy to fix by dwater · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this flexible bluetooth keyboard would work?

      http://flantta.en.alibaba.com/product/50068590/502 23184/Keyboards/Flexible_Keyboard.html>

      That's what I had in mind when I considered purchasing it. I could imagine wipping out the 770 when I was wanting to quickly look up something or whatever, but then taking out the keyboard too when I wanted to do something more involved.

      --
      Max.
    19. Re:Easy to fix by dwater · · Score: 2, Funny

      Read it again. That's not what it says. He's complaining about the keyboard that Nokia left out. I assume that the keyboard must be still at Nokia somewhere - probably piling up with all the others they left out of other people's 770s - a 'keyboard mountain' perhaps.. Quite how the reviewer managed to get hold of one so that he can review it, I don't know. Maybe he went to Finland (or China, where they're probably made).

      No, what he (probably) meant is, "The biggest flaw is the poor functionality of the software keyboard they included.", or "The biggest flaw is that they didn't include a hardware keyboard." ...or something like that.

      --
      Max.
  11. Could be worse.... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Could have as many crashes as an unpatched Win95 install....

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    1. Re:Could be worse.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But worse enough:

      To have as many bugs/crashes as a patched win98

    2. Re:Could be worse.... by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least it doesn't have as many crashes as Windows ME install (with or without patches).

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    3. Re:Could be worse.... by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he definitly should have said Windows ME. Windows 98 was the best thing Microsoft ever did- sad yes, but true.

  12. I have to agree by mehip2001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Excited, I picked one of these up about two months ago. But, I found it extremely lacking and returned it for an ipaq. Why didn't I like it? The email app almost always crashed when accessing my imap accounts. The browser (opera if I remember correctly) had real issues with moderately complex websites. The wifi seemed very slow when using encryption. In general, it wasn't much of a pda. On a positive note, the screen was beautiful and the movie playback was fantastic.

    --
    Just for the record, there is NO "off the record" record.
    Make a record of that.
    1. Re:I have to agree by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      There are some hardware issues to address (battery life, gprs, storage),

      Oh, is that all? Well, sign me up. But add the wi-fi drops to that list.

      Hmm. Not too compelling. Maybe v3 will be a great product - if they allow it to get that far. But I fear that the problems with v1 leave them wide open to even a slightly better (if much less expandable) product shutting them down.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:I have to agree by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I am not sure what the grandparent meant by listing those features. Mine gets at least 3 hours of active browsing (WiFi) on a single charge and went for about 10 hours of eBook reading on a long trip recently (low CPU usage, no WiFi / BT).

      GPRS is not an issue for me, since it connects happily to the 'phone in my pocket for that. Since my 'phone has its own battery, the drain on the 770 is quite small connecting to the Internet like that.

      Storage is expandable by just plugging in a bigger RS-MMC. Currently this limits you to 1GB.

      I also don't know what you (the reviewer?) are talking about with the WiFi drops. I have used mine on WiFi for hours at a time with no issues. Perhaps this means the power saving feature that drops the WiFi connection when there are no active connections for a short period. If you are reading a long web page then you don't want WiFi on draining the battery all that time, for example.

      The three biggest things (I think) they need to fix for the next generation are, in order:

      1. Handwriting recognition. The 770's handwriting recognition is worse than other devices had 10 years ago with CPUs a fraction of the speed. Fix it.
      2. Add another 64MB of RAM. 64MB is not quite enough. Adding 32MB of swap on Flash makes the entire device a lot more useable. RAM is cheap, don't skimp on it.
      3. Replace the mail client with one that isn't a complete waste of space. Ideally completely re-work the UI; this is a device that people will look at mail that's stored online with using IMAP, not something they will download their mail to. Design the UI around that. Oh, and make the underlying libraries actually work (e.g. actually support SMTPS, instead of having configuration boxes to set it up and then suggesting disabling SSL as soon as I try to use it. SMTPS is essential for a device that is going to be used in a variety of locations, since open SMTP relays are not that common anymore).
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:I have to agree by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "On a positive note, the screen was beautiful and the movie playback was fantastic."

      Question: Does it playback xvid or divx movies? Right now I have a library of stuff I've ripped to my desktop machine. Sometimes I like to lay down with my TabletPC and watch movies over the network. Just curious if the Nokia tablet would more or less do the same job or if I'd find myself frustrated with it.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:I have to agree by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      Yes it does, I've got three "Wallace & Gromit" movies and "Reservoir Dogs" on my device right now.

      The bad news is that the device is not powerful enough to play anything close to the native resolution of the screen... You'll have to downsample to something like 256*144 (as 16:9) or 320*192 (as native 15:9) if you want to look at 25 frames per second. The good news is that movies looks surprisingly good even at those resolutions and the screen is really good.

    5. Re:I have to agree by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      In general, it wasn't much of a pda.

      Right on! Because when I hear the phrase "Internet Tablet", the first thing that comes to mind is managing my contacts and calendar like a PDA!

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    6. Re:I have to agree by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      But this is a great way to kill a product - release a lame, crippled version of a good idea. Anyone heard of this strategy before?

      The only company that gets away with this on a regular basis is Microsoft. And lord knows we don't need another one of those kind of companies around.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:I have to agree by mehip2001 · · Score: 1

      You sir/madame are correct.

      Also, I will say that it sucked as an internet tablet. Crashed reading email(IMAP) crashed browsing the web...hell it even crashed browsing my webmail. And, it dropped the wifi connection all the time. Funny that. My ipaq cost roughly the same, handles IMAP, handles most of the web, and manages my contact info and todo list without crashing.

      Like I said in my original post; I was excited about this product. Hell I even held onto it for an extra two weeks trying to convince myself that I liked it. But, it just couldn't get the job done even as an "Internet Tablet"

      --
      Just for the record, there is NO "off the record" record.
      Make a record of that.
  13. Should Work Great At Borders... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I think this would be a wonderful replacement for the search computers at the local Borders store. Every now and then, a computer would either be stuck on the Windows 98 logo screen or a blue screen. Of course, they would have to chain them to the wall so no one walks out with one or shelved them in the "when technology goes bad" section.

  14. It is just baaaaad by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought one and had to return it after a week of various things. First it was the flaky battery, then the flaky software that ended up becoming all but unusable. To put it nicely, the software is crap. Not only that, but it's incredibly slow. I would gladly have paid an extra $150 for a system based on embedded Qt with 128MB of RAM, a better processor and a real, fast SD card system. Basically, it is a short cut looking for a quality product. They cut so many corners that's nearly a perfect circle.

    1. Re:It is just baaaaad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They cut so many corners that's nearly a perfect circle.
      "There are no sharp corners on the human body. So there are none on our products. We call it human technology"
  15. they need to stick with it by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    Nokia is very new at this and it will take the organization several years until they get the hang of it; that's the same whenever a new platform is introduced into an organization and has nothing to do with Linux. Look at Motorola's iTunes phone to see how even adding a single new capability to a phone is non-trivial. Thousands of highly reliable embedded Linux devices show that embedded Linux itself is very much up to the task.

    As for the 770, the hardware is nice, kind of like a big Palm; it's the UI that needs several more iterations--but that's OK if they stick with it.

    For the time being, the Palm Tungsten X is probably the most mature device in this space--if you want something that "just works" get it. But don't be smug about it: the Palm T|X software platform is beyond obsolete, and Palm is in deep trouble since they still haven't figured out what to replace it with.

    1. Re:they need to stick with it by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nokia is very new at this and it will take the organization several years until they get the hang of it;

      The bad thing is that Nokia had access to a perfectly fine platform: Familiar Handhelds.org Linux. The good thing is that Nokia has hired the team that did Familiar in the first place, so hopefully there will be a merge between Familiar and Maemo in the future.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  16. What i want in a PDA by CdBee · · Score: 1

    Seems to me the big makers don't always listen, so here goes:

    Keyboard and IBM-style nipple-mouse instead of a wand and touchscreen.
    Foldover format like a Psion 5 - should fit inside a suit inner pocket
    Inbuilt Bluetooth and WiFi
    Proper POP/IMAP client that handles SSL and StarTLS
    office-style apps that read either MS formats or Opendocument
    web browser than handles AJAX properly
    ability to either add a SD card or similar for storage

    O/S irrelevant. I just need the features, I don't think anyone offers this. the nearest I could find was various HP Jornadas which don't have WiFi or Bluetooth by default and because they rely on PCMCIA expension cards, can only have one or the other at a time.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:What i want in a PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a Nokia 9300i - in US, Cingular only has the non-WiFi 9300 available, but it should be available elsewhere. A lot like the old Psions.

    2. Re:What i want in a PDA by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      dude, it's called a pocketPC, they do all of that out of the box (except maybe the ajax, but the opera browser for PPC is free and should support that) i have one of the big clunky DECENT PPC's HP hx2755 and it still fit in a pocket tee-shirt without a problem. it should fit in a suit pocket easily too. with the emeil though... you might need a third party app, i know you can set pocket outlook up to sync over wifi/usb on demand, but i don't use my pda for email so i can't tell you if it supports imap or not.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    3. Re:What i want in a PDA by saihung · · Score: 1

      I had a Psion Revo+, and before it disappeared out of an open pocket in a NYC taxi it was the most perfect PDA I ever had. I replaced it with a Zaurus, but the Zaurus never quite worked properly.
      The problem is that the market for a Psion-type device is basically me and four other people - witness Psion itself, which got out of that biz a long time ago. When Psion was still making PDAs the technology and user demands were still simple enough that one small company could support the architecture fully, make software that actually works, etc. But with, for example, the Zaurus, Sharp was either unwilling or unable to give the platform the support that it needed and so offloaded the product onto the OSS community. Those are some great folks, but they have their own priorities and designing software that works out of the box and has a nice user interface usually isn't among them. The OpenZaurus project has been chugging along for years, but basic functionality like synching and dialing up still barely works, and it takes some non-trivial knowledge of Linux to get a web browser or media player (barely) working on the thing. If this is the development model that Nokia is going for, then they're crazy.

      The Nokia 770 will fail. It's a product that basically no one wants, it's too expensive and too weird, and software heavy lifting has similarly been dumped on a community that barely exists. Nokia should keep extending the functionality of the thing it does best - phones.

    4. Re:What i want in a PDA by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Isn't variety wonderful?

      >Keyboard and IBM-style nipple-mouse instead of a wand and touchscreen.

      In a PDA? Well, I can tell you, I *HATE* that damn joystick thing.. talk about uncontrollable. NOTHING is better on a PDA for mouse control than a touch screen. KB? Well, that would be nice. Look for a a thumb-keyboard replacement cover for the 770... I bet it will be made, eventually.

      >Foldover format like a Psion 5 - should fit inside a suit inner pocket

      You can easily fit the 770 in a suit pocket. I have done it. Fold-over designs, to me, are actually a pain in the *SS, makes it unusable with one hand and harder to use, in general.

      >Inbuilt Bluetooth and WiFi

      770 has both of those

      >Proper POP/IMAP client that handles SSL and StarTLS

      Look for 3rd party Email apps to hit the 770. Quite doable.

      >office-style apps that read either MS formats or Opendocument

      That is going to be a tough one, since both require huge resources.

      >web browser than handles AJAX properly

      I expect the next maemo update to address that. Probably won't be perfect, though.

      >ability to either add a SD card or similar for storage

      770 already has an RS-SD card reader, and includes an adapter so you can turn the RS card into a standard SD for plugging into other devices.

    5. Re:What i want in a PDA by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      I used to have a 9300 - no Wifi, though the 9500 does have it (I've not checked out the 9300i featureset, I instead ditched the 9300 for an N90) - but there is a tool for the 9300/i, 9500, and E series phones called Nokia Network Bridge that offers IP Passthrough to give LAN based connectivity to the device. Not perfect at all, but still can be very handy. It doesn't work with WLAN, though (ie if you connect the phone to a laptop that is getting connectivity by WLAN via USB), presumably because it installs a network driver to do the bridging, and the wireless isn't happy acting as a bridge (I dunno these things ;) )

  17. I'm happy with mine by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    I just got one a week or so ago, and it does everything I expected it to do and it does it well. It even serves as a nice walkman type device for when I'm mowing the lawn...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  18. My Nokia 770 is great by Dynamoo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    My Nokia 770 is great - it does exactly what it's designed to do. It's a great, portable way to access the web via WiFi or Bluetooth, *much* more convenient to carry around than a laptop and the great thing is that it's really an accessory to your phone, so you don't have to have a cellphone as big as a housebrick.

    What the Nokia 770 *is* - it's an internet tablet with an very high-resolution 800 pixel wide display, with a basic email client, RSS reader, multimedia support and some apps thrown in. It does come with expandable memory, and there are other apps you can load onto it for free.

    It *isn't* a laptop replacement, nor a PDA, nor a phone, nor is it a games machine or a personal multimedia player although it can do all of these to an extent. Primarily, it's designed to give you a much better web experience than you would get from a cellphone while it fits in your pocket. If you choose to extend it with keyboards, new applications and even things like GPS then it's up to you.

    Two words of warning - I bought mine directly from Nokia (I had one of the first) and the first unit was faulty, at which point I discovered that Nokia's customer service is not great. And to get the best out of the N770, some work is required in terms of patching and loading on apps.

    One last thing - it's great value. In the UK it works out as £250 including tax and shipping which is cheaper than many mobile phones.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  19. F*** the Keyboard ! give me STRONG IR ! by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    When I first saw the 770, I was thinking how great it would be as a "One Stop Ultimate Full Home Remote with web capability"

    Wireless and all is top, but what I really wanted was a 10 meters IR in addition to the wifi and ethernet.

    A nice homy tablet, allowing me to indulge in a "potato-couch" lifestyle. I could manage my VCD/DVD/TV/Video Projector, possibly some home automation tools, etc + web browsing, possibly some mail, etc.

    Some remotes offer such capabilities, strong IR, web access : Phillips Pronto, around 600-800 bucks.

    Now give me a Nokia 770, add a 10-15 meters IR receptor/emitter with a nice learning soft and it could become the standard gadget in most geeks houses.

    Of course, stable applications, possibly a tool to automatically compile what I want (Hello Gentoo emerge !) or even better a full apt-like system, and it's golden.

    Now, I didn't find a strong RS-MMC IR addon that fits the 770, so I'm nicely waiting for the "771" to be more "home centric". (yes, I know it is a "digital lyfestyle, outdoor tool", but hell, it's a GEEK tool, and we mostly spend our time indoors).

    Also, give me a "waterproof" model (100% humidity, not a 2 meters deep case) with a good and intelligent media player (or something that can grab frames already decompressed by the powerfull home server and just put them on the screen from wifi) and stream MP3/ogg/Flac in addition to web-browsing and you'll have the perfect jacuzzi/hot tub companion for nerds.

    Hello Mr Nokia. My consultant fee starts @ 1000$/day, and I'll be happy to cater to your needs.

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    1. Re:F*** the Keyboard ! give me STRONG IR ! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Ever here of LIRC?
      The solution to your problem.
      Take one linux box. It could even be a hacked Linksys router if you are good with a soldering iron.
      Add LIRC.
      Add Apache+PHP and a webpage.
      Stir well.
      Now add a bookmark to your Linux server and you have a web based remote control for you electronic devices.

      AND YES this is Slashdot so I do expect everyone here to have a home network, know how to write PHP, and have no problem setting up a webserver. And no I don't see this as a perfect end user solution! This is News for Nerds.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  20. very pleased with mine. by mikeee · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not a PDA or a teeny laptop. It's a handheld webbrowser.

    I can read news sites, RSS feeds, check my Gmail, all works just fine. It's also servicable as a MP3 or video player - certainly not as good as an ipod, and reformatting videos to appropriate resolutions/framerates/formats can be a PITA...

    I think of it as more a compact second (ok, in my house it would be 4th) computer that I can pick up and check my mail and a few news sites without wandering off to another room to log in. I don't generally respond to mails on it - it's bad at that, but that's not the point.

  21. I have to agree by porkThreeWays · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. I have one and hack on it all day. It's a fun little beast. It's basically the only device of its kind available in the states. It's a next gen Zaurus, except Nokia is sponsoring development of lot's of 3rd party apps. However, I wouldn't buy one for my mom right now. A lot of apps are still being ported and are buggy. I think the first generation of the 770 will probably fail. But once maemo has lot's of apps ported (actually, it already has a shitload, but not so much "business apps" and many aren't hildonized) and Nokia learns some lessons of the 770, it will be a success. The base install is VERY limited and that's what they review it based on. I think the potential for the 770 is in 3rd party support. How much fun is a windows install with no 3rd party apps? I'm working on porting my home automation app to the 770 (perfect example). It's a hell of a lot easier to port to the 770 than blackberry or symbian. There are some hardware issues to address (battery life, gprs, storage), but once Nokia starts including more software and has a second iteration of hardware, this line is going to be a beast. If you want an expensive lame windows box, buy an orgami. If you want another lame calendaring and email device, buy a blackberry. If you want something different all together, buy the 770.

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  22. It still is pretty kewl by kurt555gs · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a Nokia 770, and I love it. Yes, wiFi drops out, but I have installed ssh, telnet, gaim, gnumeric, joe, and a whole bunch of other things. It will axtually work as a remote X terminal, (gnome proggies, not kde ( it crashes)).

    Despite the shortcommings, it is a great way to ssh into my server(s) and fix things.

    The browser also works with my online banking, which is rare in portable devices.

    It may not be the best consumer device, but if you know what you are doing, then it has a lot more usefullness than many, if not all of the other micro-portables.

    It is well worth the $359.00 it takes to buy one.

    Cheers

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:It still is pretty kewl by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative
      My 770 was effectively free, and was well worth what I paid for it. The good:
      • The browser. I like Opera, but the UI sucks. The 770 has Opera, but a much nicer UI than the desktop version.
      • The battery. It lasts 3 hours of active browsing. Using the device as an eBook reader I've got around 10 hours out of it; great for travelling.
      • Bluetooth and WiFi both Just Work(TM).
      • Full set of development tools available.
      The bad:
      • The mail client is appalling. The UI is dreadful and it refuses to work with SMTPS.
      • The browser doesn't seem to be able to remember passwords. Very irritating when I was visiting somewhere that needed a username and password entered to connect to the WiFi, especially since the 770 turns off WiFi to conserve battery after a short while if there are no open connections.
      • The handwriting recognition is the worst I've seen. Someone wrote a handwriting recognition engine in under a hundred lines of Smalltalk, and it was better than the 770's version.
      • No bluetooth file transfer protocol server (there is a command-line one available, but with zero documentation I was unable to get it working). This makes moving files between it and a full sized machine cumbersome.
      • Dev tools are Linux only and don't really work nicely with anything that's not Debian.
      • It runs Linux. This means you get the braindead Linux out-of-memory handling. Opera just asked for a bit more memory to render a web page? Pop! The text file you were editing has just been lost because the kernel picked the text editor app to kill.
      • The text editor can only have a single document open at once.

      I don't know what version of the firmware the author had, but I haven't had any crashes with the latest one, and I only had one with the version my preview copy shipped with. He also seems to be grasping at straws claiming it has a non-standard memory card. RS-MMC is as close to a standard as anything else I've used; I have more devices that take RS-MMC than anything else, and it works fine with my cheap USB card reader.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:It still is pretty kewl by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It is well worth the $359.00 it takes to buy one.

      The price point is actually decent. If Sharp had only priced their newest Zauruses (the C1000/C3xxx series) at the same price point and actually sold them in the US, they'd sell like hotcakes. Pretty much every complaint about the Nokia is gone with the newest Zaurus series. Sharp missed the boat on that one.

      Kudos to Nokia for actually selling and supporting such a device to the Western market.

    3. Re:It still is pretty kewl by Technopundit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank you. And I hope you have a long and prosperous career with Nokia.

    4. Re:It still is pretty kewl by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "I like Opera, but the UI sucks."
      Eh?! Have you actually tried Opera (any recent version)? The UI looks exactly like any other browser!
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    5. Re:It still is pretty kewl by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      It runs Linux. This means you get the braindead Linux out-of-memory handling. Opera just asked for a bit more memory to render a web page? Pop! The text file you were editing has just been lost because the kernel picked the text editor app to kill.

      If you want to avoid getting stung by the OOM killer, then echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory.

    6. Re:It still is pretty kewl by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Dev tools are Linux only and don't really work nicely with anything that's not Debian.

      And the problem is . . . ? Just joking ;) Seriously, though, this problem runs both ways, and it only exemplifies what Linux users have had to put up with for years: things only working on one platform, be it web pages in Internet Explorer or development tools on Linux. A company that doesn't release their data (or software in general) for multiple platforms is just asking for trouble.

      It runs Linux. This means you get the braindead Linux out-of-memory handling. Opera just asked for a bit more memory to render a web page? Pop! The text file you were editing has just been lost because the kernel picked the text editor app to kill.

      Do you know a better way to handle out-of-memory problems? Obviously not, as you haven't implemented it and submitted a patch to the LKML yet. Put up or shut up.
    7. Re:It still is pretty kewl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Do you know a better way to handle out-of-memory problems?
      > Obviously not, as you haven't implemented it and submitted a patch to the LKML yet. Put up or shut up.

      Yes its called popping up a dialog that says "running low on memory, please close an application" - this way the user makes the call. People like you make M$ strong.

    8. Re:It still is pretty kewl by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      People like you are the reason linux can never get anywhere.
      Just die already.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    9. Re:It still is pretty kewl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      770 can actually tell applications to save their state and close themselves when running low on memory. When its icon is clicked it's automatically opened and state is restored.

      In theory at least.

    10. Re:It still is pretty kewl by Kesh · · Score: 1
      The hell it does. I like the way Opera renders pages, but I have to fight with the UI to get it to do things the way I want. Like, not rearrange my bookmarks alphabetically; open tabs in the background; add bookmarks to the Favorites bar; etc.

      Yeah, the basics are the same (forward-back, address line, and such), but the way it handles anything else is very different from other browsers.

    11. Re:It still is pretty kewl by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Well, the thing sure looks damned cool. While all the PDA's are bulky (for the size of the screens) with no keyboards either, silver and lots of buttons you never use, the Nokia sits there looking damned nice. The screen is very high resolution compared to all the other devices sitting around it at the store. The unit just looks sharp.

      I'll be interested to see how the next patch will improve stability. I think the unit has a lot of promise and I hope more devices go this way - open source OS with development tools available. Too many portable devices these days are locked down and I hate it!

      At $350, all they need to do is fix a few stability problems and it'll become one damned attracitve device, considering that many PDA's are twice that with lesser hardware and closed (or, not as open) operating systems.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    12. Re:It still is pretty kewl by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Do you know a better way to handle out-of-memory problems? Obviously not, as you haven't implemented it and submitted a patch to the LKML yet. Put up or shut up.

      Are we still doing this? I thought it was accepted a while ago that honest, open criticism was a healthy component of the OSS movement.

      Or, in the immortal words of Jim Sting: "Remember you told me to tell you when you were acting rudely and insensitively? Remember that? You're doing it right now."

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    13. Re:It still is pretty kewl by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking of buying one. I have an NGage QD and TMobile and have used my phone as a bluetooth modem for my laptop many times and it works great. I assume that it'd also work with the 770. The laptop is big and a pain to pull out just to check something quickly. I don't want Flash, embeded video and Java, etc (in any browser, but especially in a mini-browser). What I do want is a standards compliant browser that lets me check my webmail, PayPal, status of the sites I run, etc.

      I really don't think the problem is that these small portable devices have bad input methods so much as that people keep trying to use them as PCs when obviously they are not. I'm still in favor of a keypad friendly domain (I suggest .pad under my Apt Pad system) that treats all the letters and number assigned to a keypad button as a single entity. ie If I have apt.pad registered then 278.pad, csv.pad, and every other possible combination for those buttons would also be mine. Then you could go to the apt.pad site just by pressing 278 and enter. Essentially using phone number like numbers for websites as obviously that is the easiest thing to enter on a phone keypad. The laser projected keyboard is an interesting development for mobile devices. It'd be a great add-on to the 770.

      The crashes do bother me though. I'll wait to buy one til they have that fixed.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    14. Re:It still is pretty kewl by dwater · · Score: 1

      "And because Nokia foolishly included a cut-down "RS-MMC" (Reduced Size MultiMediaCard) slot instead of an industry-standard SD card slot, you'll pay more for the needed add-on storage (only 64 megabytes of memory are available onboard) and have a harder time finding it in stores."

      Where does he claim the RS-MMC card in non-standard? Not in the above statement. The only mention he makes of 'standard' is in relation to his suggested alternative 'SD card slot'.

      --
      Max.
    15. Re:It still is pretty kewl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one of the 770's:

      Pros:
          Nethack
      Cons:
          Time wasted on Nethack.

    16. Re:It still is pretty kewl by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      I call bullshit.

      - Opera was the first browser to open tabs in the background, IIRC, and you can do it in several ways, such as Ctrl+Shift+click, or simply a middle-click.

      - You can reorder your bookmarks the way you want.

      - You simply drag and drop to add bookmarks to the personal bar.

      You are simply wrong, and lying about Opera.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    17. Re:It still is pretty kewl by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      I have a Nokia 770, and I love it. Yes, wiFi drops out, but I have installed ssh

      Hi, I also noticed the wifi drops out (especially when using WPA-PSK), I found that if I ping to or from the unit every 20 seconds it seems to stay up indefinitely. Alternatively try flipping on the web radio (and muting the mic if you don't want to listen to it), this also seems to keep the connection going, but eats memory so I wouldn't do this unless you have enabled the swap file.

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    18. Re:It still is pretty kewl by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else get the washington post crashing Opera - this is the first time Opera has crashed for me in months. Ironic... well almost.

    19. Re:It still is pretty kewl by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      Where does he claim the RS-MMC card in non-standard? Not in the above statement.

      Not the OP, but from is statement it seems he is implying that the MMC slot is non-standard. I don't know of many non-industry standard SD card slots so when he writes "instead of an industry-standard SD card slot", I read it as him saying that MMC itself is non standard. It may not follow the laws of logic but it follows the rules of rhetoric.

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    20. Re:It still is pretty kewl by dwater · · Score: 1

      I suppose him specifically mentioning that his preference *is* standard could be taken to imply that the implementation isn't, which certainly isn't the case. Fair enough.

      --
      Max.
    21. Re:It still is pretty kewl by Kesh · · Score: 1
      No, I'm not. By default Opera does not open tabs in the background without the Ctrl-Shift-Click, and I still haven't found a way to make it default to that behavior on a middle click. Whereas, in every other browser, there's a simple checkbox in the preferences to activate that.

      By default, Opera puts your bookmarks into Alphabetical sorting. Took me hours of searching through the preferences and forums to figure out how to turn that off.

      And yes, you can drag and drop bookmarks onto the Personal bar... provided you go in and turn it on. Then turn off its alphabetical sorting, so it actually displays the way I want.

      I'm not lying, I'm telling you that Opera's UI behavior is very different from practically every other browser out there.

    22. Re:It still is pretty kewl by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      LOL.

      Opera opens in the background BY DEFAULT on middle-click.

      And yes, I'm sure it's really difficult to click the VIEW button to change the way things are viewed, LOL :D

      You are lying. Opera is not more different from other browsers than they are from each other.

      But that's expected from a fanboy :)

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    23. Re:It still is pretty kewl by Kesh · · Score: 1
      I think you've lost it. Fanboy? When did I say I was a fanboy of anything? I've tried every web browser available for my OS. I even like Opera, but the way its UI works was just too frustrating after a while.

      No, it does not load in the background when you Ctrl-Shift-click by default. (Laptops don't have "middle" buttons.)

      Yes, I've delved into the View menu. Which did jack for tweaking the things I wanted. Sorry, you're being dismissive and rather silly. I've not no reason to lie about my experience, while you seem to be trying to win a childhood popularity contest.

    24. Re:It still is pretty kewl by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Are we still doing this? I thought it was accepted a while ago that honest, open criticism was a healthy component of the OSS movement.

      Or, in the immortal words of Jim Sting: "Remember you told me to tell you when you were acting rudely and insensitively? Remember that? You're doing it right now."

      Okay, okay, so the "put up or shut up" comment was too much. But I was being serious when I asked if there was a better way. Do you know of one? I (and probably many on the Linux kernel mailing list) would be very interested in hearing a novel solution to the out of memory problem. And by novel, I mean something that hasn't already been bandied about on the list. Some would argue that solving the out of memory problem is akin to solving the halting problem (and if you don't know what that is, please don't post to the Linux kernel mailing list).


      On the on other hand, I don't consider calling the Linux out-of-memory handling "braindead" constructive criticism. When I see a comment like that I think, "here is someone who is not eloquent enough to use reason to help advance his cause, but instead appeals to emotion and uses name-calling. I should ignore him, but I just can't resist pointing out the flaws in his arguments, even if I use only slightly more tact than he does."

  23. That doesn't make any sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, you have no idea what a catch-22 is.

    Second, "Mac generally gets it right but only because they totally control and limit what hardware you can connect to their stuff." doesn't make any sense here.

    This article is the perfect example of why Mac stability is really quite remarkable. We have here hardware controlled entirely by the manufacturer, Nokia. It's *less* expandable than most Macs. You can pretty much guarantee nobody's hooking anything up to it, and if they do it's something non critical like a bluetooth device.

    Why is this Linux phone crashing all the time? It's not because of hardware unpredictability.

  24. Does Little, But Does by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    This little device changed my perspective on the mobile web. As the owner of a SE P910, I think that the device is trying to do too much. Imagine a small mobile that simply makes calls, but now add a tablet such as this. I can call, access network apps like gmail or the new calendar. Does it play flash slow as hell? Yep! Device makers totally under-estimate the needs of tablets...

    I have to admit that the thing is a gimmick today. But real soon, a platform like this will be indespensable. The hundred dollar laptop is here today at $349! Add keyboard... Something like those rollup things I've seen for the MS device would be great. The thing has not crashed on me yet, though as mentioned running Flash is not recommended. I do need to try some Widgets!

    1. Re:Does Little, But Does by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Flash is developed to be slow as hell on everything. Actually people that use flash for their websites should be sued because they eat the time (=money) away of people that have better things to do than to look at fancy moving menus, "loading..." status meters, etc. etc. for half a minute when they just quickly want to check something on the interweb. What good is a 20 mbit dsl connection and a 3 Ghz processor, when the website interface is deliberately slowed down???

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  25. Tiny tablets with keyboards by SlashChick · · Score: 3, Informative

    You must not have looked very hard; there are plenty of tiny tablets with keyboards. The tiny Thinkpad X41 tablet weighs less than 3 pounds. I didn't want a 1024x768 screen, so I went with the Toshiba Portege M200, which is 4 pounds and offers a 1400x1050 resolution. Both are convertible tablet PCs with keyboards. After a year of owning the Toshiba, I'm quite happy and have recommended Tablet PCs to many other people.

    1. Re:Tiny tablets with keyboards by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I'm sorry, I should have clarified: tiny tablets with keyboards that don't cost an arm and a leg. I want something about the size of the X41 (or a little smaller), but I also need a sub-$1000 price, and would be happy to accept PDA-level power (instead of laptop-level) to get it.

      Also, the Toshiba is an example of a big tablet, not a tiny one!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Tiny tablets with keyboards by SlashChick · · Score: 1

      The Portege M200 that I have is 4.2 pounds; I don't consider that "big", but you may.

      If you want a really tiny notebook, check out the Fujitsu Lifebook P1510D; it only weighs 2.2 pounds. That's starting to be PDA size.

      As far as your price concerns, most of the tablet notebooks are selling in the $1400-$1800 range these days, which I consider reasonable for a full-featured notebook. You're right; they won't be as cheap as regular notebooks, but I also think the tablet features are worth the premium. I especially enjoy reading online with my notebook in tablet mode. The scroll keys make it easy to do a long session of reading. And watching movies in bed is fabulous with the Tablet PC. :)

    3. Re:Tiny tablets with keyboards by fastgood · · Score: 1
      If you want a really tiny notebook, check out the Fujitsu Lifebook P1510D [reviews.cnet.com]

      The users on that same site rate the Nokia as 8.0 compared to that Fujitsu at 7.0
      (It currently has 6X as many reviews and is 4X cheaper)

      MSN's main page today linked to CNET's 770 review in "Worst Tech of 2006."

    4. Re:Tiny tablets with keyboards by fingon · · Score: 1

      Fujitsu has crappy battery lifetime. Only sub-1kilo (2.4 pounds?) notebook I could find with decent lifetime is Panasonic R4-D (and incidentally, I have the old model, and perfectly happy with it :->)

      --
      -- pending
  26. Re:It's the old catch 22 by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

    Ah to the modder... it's not off topic. If Nokia chose windows CE and not linux it would have a wealth of work already done for it. Most hardware drivers would already be written for it. It'd be simply a job of gluing all the pieces together , as opposed to making half of them.

    This sort of device is alot harder to do with Linux than it is in windows CE... Nokia has basically doubled or trippled the amount of work to deliver such a device to market

    I'm sure their choice of platform was not based on technical considerations. Where would they be if they chose windows CE ? Answer: No where in the market they'd be just making up the numbers.

  27. He doesn't get it, which isn't a surprise. by n6mod · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got one a few months ago, spurred on by the port of Einstein. If *something* could finally replace the Newton, this might be it. The truth is that Einstein is too slow for normal use, but I fell in love with the 770.

    I use it *constantly*, because it's has a real web browser (Opera w/Flash) and is pretty easy to connect over WiFi. It fits nicely in my coat pocket, and has a glorious, bright display. And it's an open and well-supported platform for development.

    The reviewer makes some good points for his world. It doesn't play well with Microsoft. That's not a factor in my world. Sure, it doesn't play WMV9. But it does play MPEG-4.
    It could use some additional memory. I moved the root fs onto a card to deal with that, and it's much more stable now.
    The network messages are a little obtuse. Basically if any connection has reached a timeout (why there's a timeout for WiFi I'll never know), it says "Network Connection Error" when you try to send a packet. So you click 'Connect', pick a network, and you're off.
    It uses RS-MMC because that's what the rest of Nokia's products use now.
    It works flawlessly with my RAZR on Cingular, and the thought of EV-DO has me looking at the Sprint/Samsung RAZR clone.

    Make no mistake, this is a 1.0 product, and not really ready for prime time. But it *is* ready for the /. crowd, IMO.

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    1. Re:He doesn't get it, which isn't a surprise. by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I have a N770 as well.
      The real deal with RS-MMC cards is that they are not what Nokia's phones are using *now*. Newest Nokia phones (at least Symbian models) are coming with mini-SD. Older models used RS-MMC - sometimes dual-voltage, which thankfully are not required for N770. And even older ones used plain MMC.

      Problem is, it would be quite easy to use a normal SD/MMC slot that would be compatible with all these formats, plus normal sized SD cards which are cheap and used in a plethora of other devices. I still haven't got why they didn't include a CF slot, a microdrive would fit the 770 pefectly.
      My other quirk is the half-assed USB host implementation. I can use an USB keyboard, mount my nano or CF card w/ reader, and I guess that even IDE drives in an USB enclosure would work. But I have to do an ugly (at least for me) soldering hack in order to do it - an the resulting package is less than portable. Supplying +5V to the USB circuit doesn't seem such a big deal.

      That said, I am quite happy with it. But I agree it is far from consumer-friendly for anyone which knows nothing about SSH/remote X-sessions and the such. As it is, it is perfect as a linux junkiee toy/remote monitoring tool, or as a standalone web-browser (using swap that is). It could be so much more with little effort.

      --
      Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    2. Re:He doesn't get it, which isn't a surprise. by n6mod · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with you that the state of USB host on the device is truly strange. If I had to guess, I'd say there was the invisible hand of a PHB there...the host software probably wasn't done, and then the power supply parts got yanked because the software wasn't there, so why spend the money. It was probably intended to have a full OTG implementation, and with luck, the next generation device will.

      (It's not quite as simple as hooking up +5...you need to switch it on or off depending on whether or not your in host mode)

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    3. Re:He doesn't get it, which isn't a surprise. by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

      yep, but switching can be done with #echo peripheral [host]> /sys/devices/platform/tahvo-usb/otg_mode so it is not such a nuisance. Scripts/applets can easily be written to do that to please the not CLI inclined as well. What bothers me is that the host software *is there*, at least some devices work. You need nothing else to use an usb keyboard or mount a mass storage device; using an USB mouse is another story, apparently the X-server won't support it.

      --
      Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    4. Re:He doesn't get it, which isn't a surprise. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      The real deal with RS-MMC cards is that they are not what Nokia's phones are using *now*. Newest Nokia phones (at least Symbian models) are coming with mini-SD.

      This surprises me - are you sure? My N90 came supplied with a 256mb RS-MMC card. There is no mini SD capability.

      Afterthought: you're right. The upcoming (possibly released in Europe?) N92 does use mini SD.

  28. Bugmenot Firefox Extension by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    Don't forget, there's a supercool BugMeNot Firefox extension.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  29. Morse Code or Speech Recognition? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Thanks, TMM! Another thing to note, however, is that there are *MANY* interfaces that can be used in-place of a keyboard. We have buttons, microphones, and other devices. We have accelerometers, infrared, ultrasound, and frickin lasers.

    Devices designed by committee are generally stupid. If Apple had an iPhone that worked properly, I'd be all over that. As it is, I haven't found a phone I like better than my old Nokia 3650, and it's of poor design!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Morse Code or Speech Recognition? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Devices designed by committee are generally stupid. If Apple had an iPhone that worked properly, I'd be all over that.

      Apropos of anything else, and even assuming it was meant to be a segue ... I think you'd be disappointed to find out that most things that come out of Apple are designed by committee. It's just that they pay more credence to their UI / etc people.

  30. Hack it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  31. Anyone have any idea when Nokia will refresh OS? by firestarter · · Score: 1

    I bought one of these last October when they first came out.

    The form factor is great, battery life is good, and I don't miss a keyboard. The web browser is OK, but the Mail app does suck (very very slow with a reasonable sized imap mailbox).

    The bigger problems are the lack of memory and processor speed. If you're running the mail app, you can only open a couple of web windows too before everything comes to a standstill.

    I'm hoping that Nokia are going to do something with memory and speed optimisation with the next software release - but haven't seen anything from them since December. A new rev was due end of Q1, but that's been and gone. Anyone have any inside information on when a rev might be made?

    Thanks!

  32. You are blind by Shohat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It did reboot and crash . The whole piece . Not just the Apps . You are blindly defending it just because it's Linux . The product is not something of quality any of us would actually pay for.
    Not everyone that says MS products are good or Linux sucks are posting flamebait/trolling . Plenty of people actually hold this opinion .
    "unpatched win 98" . Oh no ! He said MS doesnt suck enough ! OMG ! Kill him !111!!!!11!!one!

  33. Input & OCR by cutterjohn · · Score: 1

    geez, from the sounds of things Nokia should have licensed Calligrapher or whatever it's called these days. (Russian company originally, IIRC, at one time owned by SGI, then either spunoff or otherwise became independent... They used to sell OCR software for wince machines that was pretty good, but not appreciably better than M$'s transcribe(? or whatever it's called...). They also produced the original cursive OCR for the Newton which was fairly decent with a good sized dictionary, pretty much a must for decent OCR. (Printed text should work better, but it's slower inputting info, and if you can't even print decently, well... and spacing of characters can be problematic...)

    Had they done this at least the keyboard part would have gone away, as this device shouldn't even really expect to have a keyboard excepting in rare situations as it's a TABLET! otherwise it'd be a funky NOTEBOOK!

    Still sounds sort of nifty, esp. at the price, but overall I'd still think that I'd rather go with a Tabletpc or an origami device with a full windows install, etc. They're not that much more expensive and offer greater(if not notebook class) performance and capabilities, plus on the Tabletpcs there do exist linux distros that support them to an extent, but then you'd be back to crappy OCR again. Hmm... so, I guess I'd be much happier with either a full notebook with some decent horsepower or an origami as the Tabletpcs are even more stunted now v. when they first appeared they weren't that much more poorly off than current notebooks...

    --
    --- C00l .signatures please apply within...
    1. Re:Input & OCR by deque_alpha · · Score: 1

      Still sounds sort of nifty, esp. at the price, but overall I'd still think that I'd rather go with a Tabletpc or an origami device with a full windows install, etc. They're not that much more expensive

      I'm sure you're saying this based on the "about $500" that MS claimed when the UMPC's wrere announced. Well, hate to burst your bubble, but Samsung just announced pricing for the Q1 (and a May 1 launch) at about $1200. Apparently the other UMPC manufacturers are also struggling to get under $1000.

      That's quite a bit more than $350, if you ask me.

      The 770 is kind of an odd device though, I have to admit. In a lot of ways it seems that it's trying to fill a niche that doesn't really exist. Either people can get away with devices that are significantly smaller, or they need a real computer. This middle area that the 770 occupies seems to have very little real demand.

  34. Who are you calling a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ran Win98 on over 100 machines with countless screaming kids trying to break them on a regular basis with no problems. Patched or not. Now granted, all of these machines had been policy edited, were behind an OBSD firewall, ran Litestep, and had been stripped down to run just what I needed and nothing else, but crashing? Not likely. Not often. When a machine crashed I forked over a free hour (this was a game center, btw). Not something I liked to do and not something I did often.

    So here I'm lost as to where your information comes from for Win98 crashing. Sure, it takes some skill on the admin's part, but not much. And much less work/skill needed to do squat on a *nix machine. I know it's customary fanboyness to call MS products crap, but you really should think before you post out troll dung calling something troll dung.

    I hate MS, too. I just hate mouth-running fanatics more.

  35. "Laptop Replacement" is a misnomer by Bombula · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure I fully understand the logic of "laptop replacements" or even "desktop replacements" (referring to laptops) for that matter. Since technology continues to progress exponentially, there will - at any given time - always be things a desktop can do that cannot be 'replaced' by a concurrent laptop. And similarly, there are always things a laptop can do that cannot be 'replaced' by a concurrent handheld device.

    The only exception to this fairly self-evident situation is one of marketing: an older, cheaper laptop can in some - and only some - ways be 'replaced' by a bleeding-edge laptop, etc, etc.

    So really, it is a matter of deciding for yourself what functionality you want from a device and determining if the technology and/or market are available for that functionality. If all you want a computer for is word processing, spreadsheets, and solitaire on a 15 inch screen (like the majority of people, say, 10 years ago), then even the cheapest current laptop will fulfill those functional requirements. But if you want 3D gaming, wireless internet access, 5.1 surround sound, and dual-head 22" displays, well you're not going to get that on anything but a desktop for the time being.

    The problem is that handheld devices still cannot really fulfill the lowest-common-denominator functional requirements (office apps, simple games, music, telephony, internet, and email) adequately for 2 main reasons: display size and input quality (ie: keyboard and mouse).

    Personally, I have no interest in editing text documents or spreadsheets, playing games, or watching movies with a stylus on a 2" x 3" touchscreen. I might read (but not write) email and check RSS newsfeeds, but that's all I'm comfortable doing without a large screen and a keyboard and mouse, or equally functional input devices (ie: voice recognition and pupil-driven pointing device).

    I'm sure the technology will bring the functionality I need to handheld devices quite soon, but we're definitely not there yet. So for the time being, when I'm on the move it makes more sense for me to have a phone I can check email with and/or a laptop to actually do work on.

    --
    A-Bomb
  36. Wifi by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

    From TFA:
    WiFi on the 770, however, may not work much better. The review model I tested frequently failed to log on to my home network's wireless signal for no apparent reason; uselessly vague error messages such as "network problem" left me guessing about the cause.

    Now, don't go blaiming his home wifi setup. There's nothing wrong with it, I haven't had any problems over the last two months, and I'm two miles away using a Pringles box as an antenna.

    --
    For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
  37. Well by Drakin030 · · Score: 0

    Its Linux what can you expect...Yeah troll I know.

  38. "Does little and not very well" for $200, Alex! by jpellino · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ooh Ohh I know this one!

    What is "Apple ///"?
    What is "Karl Rove"?
    What is "Windows 1.0"?
    What is "Windows ME"?
    What is "Microsoft Bob"?
    What is "Moeller SkyCar"?
    What is "3DO"?
    What is "Buran"?
    And the Daily Double,
    What is "FEMA"?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:"Does little and not very well" for $200, Alex! by Farce+Pest · · Score: 1

      What are "Slashdot editors"?

      --
      This message has been scanned for memes and dangerous content by MindScanner, and is believed to be unclean.
    2. Re:"Does little and not very well" for $200, Alex! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What "does your mother do", Trebek!? HAHAHAHA!

    3. Re:"Does little and not very well" for $200, Alex! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is "the most tired non-joke on Slashdot"?

  39. Lack of keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the reviewer not understand the concept of a 'tablet'? Tablet in that it has either a passive or active touch display operated by a stylus a la pen and paper?

    Yes, I know that some tablets have keyboards, but sticking 'no keyboard' on a list of negatives is like complaining a car doesn't have wings.

    If this guy knew what he was talking about, there would've probably been a mention of the Nokia's closest competitor platform -the UMPC - in the article, but there isn't. And he might also have figured out that if you happen to need a tablet with a keyboard, you can buy foldout Bluetooth-enabled ones, but he doesn't.

    If there's one thing that gets be annoyed, it's people who review devices solely on how well it matches desktop/laptop usage models...

  40. Unfortunate heritage. by Kaptain_Korolev · · Score: 1

    The 770 was developed by the same team who put out the 7710 so it probably inherited some of the design problems in that first device.

    Personally I think the whole form factor of the 77x(x) series is just wrong. I worked as electronics engineer for the big N in Southwood England a couple of years ago and I remember getting to play with the un-released 7700. All I can say is thank goodness they didn't release it, the software wasn't that bad but the design of the thing was like a kids toy. I actually originally though it was a proto and was somewhat shocked when I was told it was a soon to be released product.

    It is the wrong size, yes you get screen real estate but it is too bulky to pocket and not big enough to act as a laptop replacement ( bit like UMPCs in that respect ). This is not even beginning to mention it's shortcomings with regards to user input.

    It is interesting that Nokia is pursing this route when the rest of the industry seems to be moving from stylus based entry to small thumb boards ( Treo 650, HW6915 etc. )

    1. Re:Unfortunate heritage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is interesting that Nokia is pursing this route when the rest of the industry seems to be moving from stylus based entry to small thumb boards ( Treo 650, HW6915 etc. )"

      I think that you have not seen the Nokia E61...

  41. What I got in my PDA by K-Mile · · Score: 1

    You should try the Qtek 9100.

  42. My Nokia 770 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love my 770. It has replaced my laptop for getting my news on the couch. It seems like porting applications is really fast. I'm even thinking of porting Qalculate! to it. I want to buy a small bluetooth keyboard for the thing.

    It has a great browser, though it definitly could be improved.

    Things to improve:
      * Video player should support more formats
      * Audio player should support more formats
      * You should be able to easily switch windows when browsing in full screen mode
      * Smoother newsreader
      * The browser (opera) does not work with wellsfargo.com (let us change the browser id)
      * Nokia needs a more centralized app registry instead of the ApplicationCataloge, something professional, so I don't feel like I'm risking my tablet with an install from an unknown source.
      * Better note taker (waiting for Xjournal to finish porting)
      * I wish the directional buttons only scrolled the page, instead of going from link to link.

    1. Re:My Nokia 770 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The browser (opera) does not work with wellsfargo.com (let us change the browser id)"
      Huh? Opera works fine with wellsfargo.com. It's the site that specifically blocks Opera. Don't complain about OPERA because a site blocks it.
  43. Google Voice Recognition by ink · · Score: 1
    This is why Google wants to do voice recognition. Imagine having a phone-sized device that could understand the spoken word. It might not be great for composing an essay, but it would kick ass for getting directions, running IM, making notes and pretty much anything else Google is good at. I've been waiting for my GooglePhone for years now; but companies keep making crap like this instead (I'm also very disappointed with my Nokia 6101 -- I think they've lost me as a customer).

    Get the voice recognition done already! I can handle a virtual-touch keyboard for the one-off case, but I need a full keyboard until we have good voice recognition.

    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
    1. Re:Google Voice Recognition by DMoylan · · Score: 1

      >Imagine having a phone-sized device that could understand the spoken word.

      Imagine sitting on the bus next to the guy using one. Its bad enough with mobile phones, ipods and you think the homicide rate will stay the same with a huge irritant like this thrown into the mix?

      IBM demonstrated a voice powered palm clone a number of years ago. i thank any gods in the vicinity that it never made it to market!

  44. Re:It's the old catch 22 by sci50514 · · Score: 0

    If Nokia uses Win CE, it cannot differentiate the Nokia 770 from the gazillion me-too products that looks the same. Morever, WinCE has higher hardware specification than the embedded Linux.

    Nokia has enough engineering resources to push this device. If I am not wrong, the device was launched within a year of product conceptualization. I admire Nokia 'cos Nokia will never want to compete with all those cheesy no-brand company which will happily slap a WinCE with hardly any real engineering and sell it at a me-too price to undercut each other.

  45. What about a chording bluetooth keyboard? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    What about a chording bluetooth keyboard .... maybe like the Chordite.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  46. Why is this so hard? by koan · · Score: 1

    Why can't anyone release a piece of hardware/software that actually does what people want and doesn't cost an arm and a leg or as in this case doesn't seem worth even looking into?
    I want a light laptop that is always connected via cell network or wireless and has a decent sized screen, is easy to update (RAM, hard drive, software, modular hardware components) AND CAN BE UPDATED.
    Then I want a connection plan that doesn't rape my wallet when I send an email.

    With out fail everything I have looked at sucks in its implementation, or is way overpriced (like the cell phone companies data plans).

    It seems like there are some ripe opportunities for some bright group put there...

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  47. VUI by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It would about have to come from a voice interface then. One that worked. A bluetooth or wired headset and just...talk to the machine. Then it could be small.

    I so much agree on the tiny, I detest having to go get new cell phones, it has gotten to the point I can barely use them they have gotten so small. All this new really small stuff is designed with young humans with tiny fingers and great eyes in mind it appears. It doesn't matter how tiny the device is if you just can't use the thing, doesn't matter how many features it has if you can't see the screen or manipulate the buttons.

    Note to hardware companies-look around the western world, the population with a lot of disposable income is neither real young nor do they have great eyes. Stiff fingers/arthritis and bifocals are *common*. You want those folks business, keep that in mind when you are designing stuff. These companies are telling folks who think nothing of dropping 100 grand on an RV that their market segment isn't worth releasing products designed with them in mind. Pretty much a huge missed business opportunity there near as I can see..with my bifocals. Keep saying FU to that market and it will reply in kind. Cater to it, you *might* get some bizznezz...

  48. I love my Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Nokia 770, and I love it.

    Yeah, well I love my Dell, and I can prove it!

  49. Palm OS - still good, but obsolete? by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1
    the Palm T|X software platform is beyond obsolete, and Palm is in deep trouble since they still haven't figured out what to replace it with.


    What makes Palm OS obsolete, in your opinion?

    It is still the device that I turn to for portable information-management with long battery-life. I would buy a Treo if they worked with Grafitti.

    I think Palm's biggest problem is software development tools -- I haven't tried their Eclipse-based studio yet, but I would like to know the comments of people who have used it.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:Palm OS - still good, but obsolete? by MS-06FZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      What makes Palm OS obsolete, in your opinion?

      I'm not trying to specially qualify my comments by saying this - I merely feel like sharing my background on the subject. From 2000 until early 2002 I was a professional programmer working on the XMap Handheld (AKA Solus) mapping product for PalmOS. I followed the product line pretty closely for a few years, from the tail-end of OS3 up until the period in which OS5 was being introduced to developers. It's a system that I love for various reasons but lately I've felt that it has some real issues that need to be addressed.

      Top on the list is PACE - the m68k emulator/translator that runs on all the ARM-based OS5 devices. It's fantastic that they were committed to providing this level of backward-compatibility. The problem is (and I could be quite mistaken here, if my knowledge is as outdated as I would hope it is) that as far as I know they never rolled out a full-fledged way to write fully-fledged ARM applications. PalmOS6 came out in 2003 (according to Wikipedia) but no devices use it - including the recent and upcoming Treo models. The only way to get native ARM code into a Palm app these days is with "PACE Native Objects" - chunks of native ARM code stuck into an emulated m68k application. The result is that people still mostly write m68k code for their Palms, even though the platform moved to ARM years ago.

      Next is the lack of a multitasking, protected environment for programs. There's a limited capacity for multitasking (IIRC the underlying OS for both OS 1-4 and OS5 both provide this support, but PalmOS operates on top of this layer, providing the entire environment within one "process" and not enabling access to that functionality) Sure, I believe in the "Zen of Palm" and all that - I think the PalmOS design makes sense in many ways in that it limits the portable device from accumulating a lot of cruft in the dynamic heap by essentially limiting it to one application at a time - but I am also a bit of a tech nerd and it does bug me that they haven't modernized this thing. A reboot shouldn't be necessary when an application crashes. And if a particular application is better implemented through real multi-threading as opposed to having execution jump all over the place in a single thread, then that's how it should be done.

      Then there's internationalization. I know the importance of this will be quite a lot less for the majority of people - but I greatly enjoy the ability to properly represent and process foreign text using Unicode. I find the continued lack of it on PalmOS to be disappointing.

      Internationalization and PACE were the two main factors that almost stopped me from buying a new PalmOS device to replace my defective and long-ailing Tungsten T2. (It's only defective because I bought a refurbished device from overstock.com, and it's always had issues.) The availability of things like an up-to-date Python interpreter on Windows Mobile was also a big draw. In the end, however, I decided that Palm is still the right portable platform for me, so I'll be receiving a Treo 650 soon. :)

      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    2. Re:Palm OS - still good, but obsolete? by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1
      What makes Palm OS obsolete, in your opinion?

      It's not his opinion, it's a fact - what other word would you have for an OS in this day and age that does not provide:

      • Memory protection
      • Preemptive multitasking
      • Any security features to speak of
      • A filesystem, for crying out loud


      ... and the list goes on. I've been a Palm user since the Palm III, but I ditched my Treo about 6 months ago and haven't looked back. The operating system has hardly evolved in the years since the Palm III (they've added what, color support?) There's a reason PalmOS devices are so crash-prone - because any application can write all over everything if it wants to (or if there's a bug that causes it to do so), and if an application happens to get into an infinite loop, the entire thing locks up.

      It is still the device that I turn to for portable information-management with long battery-life.

      What you want is a BlackBerry (with a hosted BES account if you won't be using a company-provided one). Instant wireless push-syncing of email, contacts, calendar, tasks, notes. Long battery life, due to the fact that it doesn't maintain a constant network connection while waiting for data - it comes down via a server-initiated push only when new data is available.

      BlackBerries are the ultimate in geek devices, too - they don't try to do everything, but what they do, they do better than any other solution out there. They don't waste time and money on needless frills - just the functionality. Mine has NEVER crashed, never missed an email, never missed a phone call (the 8700 is a far better phone than the Treo, by the way). And since the software is all Java/J2ME-based, 3rd-party programs are far more stable as well.

      My only real beef with my BlackBerry is the ugly fonts.
    3. Re:Palm OS - still good, but obsolete? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >I would buy a Treo if they worked with Grafitti.

      Ah, but it *DOES*, and I have used it for YEARS...

      GrfAnywhere.prc
      http://www.escande.org/palm/GrfAnywhere/

    4. Re:Palm OS - still good, but obsolete? by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

      It's not his opinion, it's a fact - what other word would you have for an OS in this day and age that does not provide: ...
              * A filesystem, for crying out loud


      Are you not familiar with the VFS system? The SD card slots that have been on Palm devices since the m500? (Though VFS actually dates back at least to the original Sony Clie...)

      That counts as a "filesystem" for sure - though most Palms don't have a VFS volume built in (exceptions being, I guess, Lifedrive, and IIRC the T5 and TX).

      So how about Palm's database manager? I think there's some advantages and disadvantages there when compared to a hierarchical filesystem.

      One major disadvantage is that all database names must be unique. This requires a level of fair-play among applications that most aren't likely to respect. (For starters, apps are supposed to include their creator ID as part of the DB name... that by itself ought to be just about enough to do the job - though even better would be if apps were required to have the ID at a certain place in the DB name - but most apps just don't do that.)

      Personally I feel the DB layout on Palm is adequate for the typical PalmOS device with between 32-256MB of DB storage space. There's not a great need for a file hierarchy and the creator ID system does a fair job at segregating one application's data from another.

      The only real disadvantage to not having a more traditional filesystem is that it hinders ports of existing software.

      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  50. Amazing. Absolutely amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    This guy's a genius, debunking Mac fanboi trolls. He should be an editor.

    --
    Trolling all trolls since 2001.

  51. Few things.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    There's a few things where Nokia missed the boat on this one. First:

    MEMORY

    64 MB is a paltry set of memory for Linux. Would have been much better with 128 MB of ram. There's also not enough rootfs space either. Notice ye hackers doing things like Swap on the RS-MMC....I don't have to do that on my Pocket PC!

    RS-MMC

    RS-MMC??? I can't really bitch that it's not standard because it is (follows MMC) but SD or even transflash would have been a way better choice. IN fact, here's what to do in the next iteration....integrate a MicroDrive or make SD the standard.

    NO PIM APPS!
    Ok, I know, it's NOT supposed to be a PDA yet it looks very much like a PDA....so what is it?? They say it's a internet tablet. People want a PDA or a Pocket PC that has these screen specs! If they had PIM apps, it could replace a PDA for most people. The open source ones are coming, but I need to sync my calendar TODAY.....not in a year!

    ANEMIC CPU!
    You could have tried the Xscale PXA270. It's about twice as fast.

    That said, I still would love to have one of these to hack around with. I have been think about it for a LONG time. Since CompUSA didn't do what I thought they were going to do (Thought they were going to give me a gift card, they instead upgraded me to a HP iPAQ hx2495), I will have to wait a while.

    Not ready for the market? Nokia must have thought it was and Linux geeks are not the only ones buying these things. For light websurfing, the current configuration DOES work, but it get's slow really quick.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Few things.... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more about the memory. There is just NO EXCUSE for it having only 64MB of RAM at a time when memory is dirt cheap. I addressed that in my review several months ago (http://markadavis.org/770review.pdf). What would an additional 64MB have really cost? $5 more? And it hurts it more than ANYTHING else. And 770 RAM is not expandable, so we are stuck with 64 forever on this hardware. About the only hope is drastically smaller and more efficient code across the OS and applications to make better use of what IS available.

      RS-MMC really isn't as much of a limitation as some (including me) thought it would be, since it is compatible with SD (using the included adapter).

      No PIM was also a complaint in my review (I think... hard to remember now).

      After having used it several months, my chief complaint is still the lack of RAM. With more RAM, it would perform much better and be a much more stable and useful platform.

      It is well built, ultra cool, hacker friendly, nice size, great battery, wonderful screen, and affordable. It is certainly much more interesting than most things in it's class... if there is such a class.

      Now, if I could just have some way to *easily* convert MPEG2+sound to an appropriate size, aspect, and framerate for the 770 using standard Linux tools......

  52. Comparing it to an 11 year old OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on! The attempted Microsoft dig you just made is a hilarious failure. If a Linux device is being compared to an 11 year old OS as far as stability goes...Linux has a loooooooooong way to go!

  53. more positive review: mine by fikx · · Score: 1

    Don't take this article as a definitive answer. My experience seems to be the opposite from this guy. I've had one for a few months now and it has been perfect for me. I haven't had the crashes he describes and I've been abusing it quite a bit. I did notice that when you use up it's memory, it's got nowhere to go and will slow down so much that it looks to be locked, but I think I've had one crash the whole time I've used it, and that was the first weekend I was using it. Not sure what I was doing at the time, but I haven't done managed it since. As far as WiFi, I set it up to my 128bit WEP code and have had no trouble from day one. it connects automatically (it's an option which I enabled) to my home if available and it not (when away from home) it gives the network error he describes and then scans for other networks. No problem. I leave it on all the time (except when I forget and drain the battery forcing it to turn off) and I've had no stability problems at all, as long as I know that any memory hog web pages might slow it down. And, it DOES recover in those cases. I use it constantly when home or away. All the programs work for me, and it's been one of the best gadgets I've ever gotten. I've used all the included apps and they all work better than any PDA app I've used. The email program even download all 1100 email headers from my ISP with no issues and can open up any message I click on. As a long time Palm user, I know it's not going to replace a PDA, but it was never meant to replace that anyway and it does it's own thing great.

    I assume it may come down to what you expect and what you want to use it for, but for me, it works great. The on-screen keyboard is my preferred way anyway, so that doesn't bother me. I'd actually forgotten it had handwritting recognition since I've never tried it. The keyboard is fast and easy, so I never bothered.

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  54. Great - for what it is by InsurgentGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had one of these since just about Christmas. It's a great gadget for what it is: a wireless web browser on a Linux platform. The screen is crystal clear, the web browsing works and I've had no issue with network connectivity. To the extent there is a problem it is that Nokia seems to be marketing this as a consumer-ready device. It isn't. Mail is flaky, the PIM functions are missing, etc, etc. If it was only sold to its target audience (alpha geeks) everything would be cool.

    All that said - I love it. I can pick it up and check the news, turn the internet access on or off for my kids or even VNC into a server if I really feel I must. Would I spend $350 of food money on it? No. But - if you can affort $350 for a cool toy - this is one.

  55. not sure what they were thinking by sucati · · Score: 1

    you can get a dell axim x51v for about the same price and it works pretty good. its display resolution is a bit smaller at 640x480, but it is also lighter and it supports ms office docs and windows media. install orb and you can watch tv over wifi.

  56. Worthless headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice that this headline is so undescriptive, it applies as much to itself as to the article?

  57. Does little my butt. by DemonWeeping · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Does little my butt. by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't need a CS degree to browse the WEB. Just a thought

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  58. Citrix? by 222 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember looking at these things and seeing a somewhat functional citrix client...

    Has anyone tried to get something like this up and running?
    I've been deploying tablet PC's in an industrial enviornment that are essentially expensive thin clients, it would be nice to find a replacement at almost a 10th of the price.

    1. Re:Citrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to the Maemo developer's Wiki, application wish list, and post your request. Assuming, of course, that it's not already done and somewhere else on the Wiki.

      I admit that I have no idea what citrix is and no inclination to look it up, however, if it's not an application, there are other places in the Wiki where libraries and such are discussed.

    2. Re:Citrix? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Citrix I haven't tried... but, then, I have no interest in trying to view expensive MS-Windows applications (Citrix is very expensive. MS-Windows server licenses are very expensive. Hardware to support such MS/Citrix servers are very expensive).

      VNCviewer, yes.... although slow (it is bit-image, afterall), but it does work.

      Since it runs X, remote X would seem to be more feasible.

      As a thin-like client, it would be ideal to develop a web-based backend for your applications. Then (theoretically), you can use ANY front end client. And in some environments, the 770 would be ideal for such applications.

  59. don't condem it before looking at it by fikx · · Score: 1

    A point to all those comments that are jumping on the bandwagon and condemming this device: try it first. This thing is the first of this type of device (or at least one of the few). I keep seeing a lot of reactions based only on this review and the specs. Yeah, you can judge a lot form that kind of stuff, but not all. A lot of these assume "yeah, it's linux, they should have choosen a better platform. no wonder it doesn't work well" or "yeah, a device that small should have a keyboard. it's not usable" look like they are from people who haven't even tried the thing.

    My advice: try it first. They've got 'em out in places like CompUSA. Try to use it before deciding "Nokia missed on this one" . Until then, you can say it LOOKS like it's unusable but you can't say it IS unusable until you've actually USED IT. Since it's a new category of gadget, there's only so far you can go with comparisons. It's like the hybrids: you have to test drive one to see if it works for you. No amount of driving other cars is going to tell you if it works for you, even if you know all the details about the engine and such.

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
    1. Re:don't condem it before looking at it by faedle · · Score: 1

      I've looked at it.

      The reviewer, and everybody else who's slamming it, is right. It has some quite obvious and annoying flaws that prevent it from doing what it is supposed to be.

      I'm calling it for what it is. An underpowered, underfeatured, worthless piece of shit.

    2. Re:don't condem it before looking at it by fikx · · Score: 1

      Just for the record, I was complaining about all those who condemmed it without trying it.

      Also, I own one and it is none of the things you mention. But, opinions vary, eh?

      --
      AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  60. Good for tinkerers by jfenwick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This guy seems to like his a lot. It's a blog dedicated to his experiences with the Nokia 770. He's used at as part of a robot, as a GPS in his car, and even managed to connect to the internet through his cellphone with bluetooth, despite the fact that some people think you can't. It's all a matter of it you have the time to spend messing with it to get it to do what you want. Unfortunately, I really don't think it suits my needs out of the box, since what I really need is a pda that has a calendar, wifi, and works on Linux. The Zaurus seems like it would fit that role, but I have no way of trying one out since Sharp stopped making them in the US, so I really don't know if it would fit my needs.

    1. Re:Good for tinkerers by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "It's all a matter of it you have the time to spend messing with it to get it to do what you want."

      Yeah, there's nothing quite as fun as spending hard earned money on something you have to work really hard to get to work as advertised.

      Gee, it's a damn thing Nokia doesn't make cars, "I know a guy who got the Nokia SUV to make left turns, he spent a few days messing with it, but it works! His next task is getting it to get to go in reverse."

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Good for tinkerers by jfenwick · · Score: 1

      Right, I wasn't saying it was something fit for the general consumer at all. I'm not even planning on buying one since it doesn't fit my needs.
      However, I see the ability to modify the device as you see fit as a benefit. If I had to pick between the 770 and something like say, the Origami, I'd pick this any day, because you have more options when it comes to modifying it.

    3. Re:Good for tinkerers by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      I got a Zaurus off eBay a few months ago. You can get an SL5500 for about $140 used.

      I used PocketWorkstation to set up a full installation of Debian Sarge on my SL5600's SD card. If you expand it with a CompactFlash WiFi card, it can browse the web with Dillo (Firefox is unusable and Minimo, while usable, is slow). It can do symbolic integration and differentiation with Maxima and matrix calculations with Octave. It supports self-hosted development through GCC and Python. I ported my custom C++ scheduling program to the Zaurus quite easily. It can emulate a TI-83+ at usable speeds (with TilEm). It supposedly can act as a remote terminal using VNC and ssh, and the ssh capability is a lifesaver for me, but I haven't used the remote VNC feature, so I can't judge.

      You can check webmail with it, in Minimo if nothing else, but I don't very often. I haven't tried Thunderbird, but it's probably too slow to be usable. Text-based Linux mail clients would probably work better; I've heard reports of Sylpheed being run successfully.

      My Zaurus does pretty much everything I could reasonably want it to, and the Debian universe is available to you if you need other capabilities. (Did I mention that updates to most of the packages I mentioned are just an apt-get away? :) You can fit up to a 1GB SD card in the Zaurus's SD slot, so storage probably won't be a problem. You're mostly limited by the Zaurus's 400MHz Intel XScale ARM processor and its RAM (64MB for the SL5500; 32MB for my SL5600 model).

      By the way, I got quite a kick out of the announcement that Windows Vista would support swapping to flash drives. I tried that on the Zaurus ONCE. Don't do it. Swapping to flash is so slow as to be useless.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
  61. Sharp Zaurus by Caligari · · Score: 1

    I've got a Sharp Zaurus and it seems much nicer than this thing. Has a full keyboard too. Of course, its more expensive. You get what you pay for.

    --
    The moving cursor writes, and having written, blinks on.
  62. I've noticed that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux crashes a lot more than I was led to believe. I would demand a refund but the distro is already "out of business".

  63. Handwriting Recognition by electrichamster · · Score: 1

    I have to differ from the review in that I found the handwriting recognition to be the best I'd ever used once it had been taught some of my more "eccentric" letter formations. Surely I can't be the only one?

    As for the 770, love it to bits - although until IT2006 is released (Supposedly end Q2 now) it is definately a device for the slashdot reader (Though my girlfriend loves it to bits, I have difficulty getting it off her sometimes).

    1. Re:Handwriting Recognition by gral · · Score: 1

      I like the character recognition as well. My previous device is an Axim, and it always ticked me off what it would and wouldn't recognize.

      Training the Nokia to a specific style is pretty easy. As is, adding shortcut squiggles (sp?). You can create a shortcut for almost any line you want to draw. (As long as it doesn't come too close to something already recognized.)

      Another item I found pretty useful was the Train program itself. It shows you exactly what it expects for each character. There are several defaults for each letter and you can add your own.

      --
      Scott Carr
  64. In other words ... by LaughingCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's yet another poorly conceived, badly implemented device from Nokia - a company that has proven time and time again that they make good phones, but haven't got a clue when it comes to making anything else. Seriously, in a former life I wrote applications for cell phones, and the Nokia devices were THE WORST. Everything was non-standard; every model had a unique twist. They touted their Symbian operating system as an "open and standardized" platform, but our sourcecode was riddled with #ifdef NOKIA3650, #ifdef NOKIA6600, #ifdef NOKIAinsertmodelnumberhere ... blah blah blah. Nothing they do surprises me anymore and I wouldn't carry anything with a Nokia name on it other than a cheapo bottom-of-the-line phone (which they do a pretty good job on).

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  65. have a look at this one..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...seems much better to me! => www.pepper.com
    Even a keyboard and 20GB disk

  66. I have one by gral · · Score: 1

    I haven't had any problems with WiFi dropping out, at several different resturant locations, as well as at the house. I have used it upwards of an hour straight with no problems.

    The main reason I bought the nokia is for the screen. It is GREAT. I read EBooks from Gutenberg all the time. (Converted to Plucker using GutenMark, and Sunshine.) For this purpose, the Nokia is perfect. (My wife made me buy her one for this purpose also.)

    The browser has worked very well so far. I do not use the Email system, but the browser handles my WebMail through Horde very good. Slashdot works very good as well.

    Transfering from my computer is a breeze. You hook up the USB cable and you have a Jump Drive. I don't see the problem with that.

    The only area I would like to see more development is in the PIM suites available. The each have their own nuances, and neither does anything well. There is currently no alarm on either as well.

    --
    Scott Carr
    1. Re:I have one by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >I haven't had any problems with WiFi dropping out

      Neither have I- never, not even once. I think he is whacked.

      >The main reason I bought the nokia is for the screen. It is GREAT.

      It is, hands-down, the best screen on any portable device I have ever seen.

      >There is currently no alarm on either as well.

      Annoying isn't it? I discovered that not only is one not included, I couldn't find one on the net either... I was surprised. On my Treo, "bigclock" rules.... I still think I would rather have PIM first. I will admit, something compatible with Palm PIM file formats would be perfect, since Linux/Win/Mac users could use existing software. Alas, I bet software patents will ruin that, like everything else.

  67. Ok, then what's an alternative???? by dspyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All you bashers (reviewer included), please tell me what $400 alternative is out there that has WiFi and Bluetooth and some kind of mass-storage device? Battery life has to be greater than a laptop, so let's say 4-5 hours. Keyboard preferred, but if there's a workable alternative that would be fine. Screen must be landscape for viewing web pages (so rule out your ipaq's and palms and most cellphones). I think Nokia got the concept, design, and price right... they just missed on the keyboard and the application & connectivity reliability. If they come out with an attachable thumboard (bluetooth or otherwise) and they provide patches for the OS and the apps, I'll definitely buy one. --D

    1. Re:Ok, then what's an alternative???? by Fishsticks · · Score: 1

      Screen must be landscape for viewing web pages (so rule out your ipaq's and palms and most cellphones) My iPAQ (rx1955) can easily be switched into landscape mode simply by holding down the calendar button on the front for about 2 seconds. It's still a relatively small screen, but in a pinch I can read most websites just fine on it if I want to check on something quickly rather than hauling out the laptop and waiting for it to boot up. I'll agree it's not great for extended web browsing though.

    2. Re:Ok, then what's an alternative???? by mlk · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my HTC Wizard. (Cost: £50, plus phone bill (£250 over 18 months), or £389.99 sim free). It has a smaller screen, but keyboard.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:Ok, then what's an alternative???? by Jaegs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps a Palm LifeDrive will suit your needs: $400? Check. Wi-Fi & Bluetooth? Check. Mass-storage device? Depends on how you define "mass" storage. It has a 4GB HDD, with expansion via an SD slot. (tentative) Check. 4-5 Hours battery life? Check. Keyboard It has a virtual keyboard and graffiti. A free wireless keyboard came with mine. Check. Landscape mode for surfing the web or looking at pictures? Check. Plus it has a drive mode for acting like a USB mass storage device, a camera mode for use with digital cameras, and comes loaded with software. Want to edit your office documents? Use Docs2Go. Want to listen to your music? It comes with PocketTunes. It's even got solitaire.

  68. Is there really a market for one of these by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

    Is this any more convenient than using a notebook. Wifi generally found in an area where you can sit down (ie offices, coffee shops, your home) and pop out your notebook. I never had to access the web while I was walking on the street. Personally, I enjoy my escapes from the web (I don't want it everywhere). Besides, the real hurdle to computing on the go is a reliable voice interface. Forget the stylus and the keyboard, just tell the thing what you want like you would a human being. "Open the Web...Take me to Slashdot...I want read such and such article"

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  69. i returned mine and bought a windows mobile pda by honold · · Score: 1

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=17330 1&cid=14420576

    i ended up grabbing a dell axim x51v to replace it. you have to jump through a couple hoops to get certain apps to run in vga, but i've been pleased with the unit overall. i use the pre-release opera web browser on it, and i haven't had any problems like i encountered with the 770.

    it's also a big bonus that i was able to pick up a bluetooth gps receiver and a car cradle for navigation with my purchase.

    most recently, i bought a slingbox media streamer so now i can watch my own tv on it!

    overall i'd rather have a umpc when it comes out, because it's mostly about home browsing and gps navigation for me. but i'm glad i picked up my axim, and i think it's orders of magnitude better than the 770. for people who value the actual pda/pim aspects, i think it would be a particular no-brainer (ignoring linux affinity).

    1. Re:i returned mine and bought a windows mobile pda by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      i ended up grabbing a dell axim x51v to replace it. you have to jump through a couple hoops to get certain apps to run in vga, but i've been pleased with the unit overall. i use the pre-release opera web browser on it, and i haven't had any problems like i encountered with the 770.

      most recently, i bought a slingbox media streamer so now i can watch my own tv on it!


      Wow, your comment gives me a real case of deja vu. Let's quote from another post in this thread :

      you can get a dell axim x51v for about the same price and it works pretty good. its display resolution is a bit smaller at 640x480, but it is also lighter and it supports ms office docs and windows media. install orb and you can watch tv over wifi.

      Hmm. It covers pretty much the same subjects that your post does. Stranger still, the writing style is exactly the same - the author is too retarded to use capital letters, but knows how to use punctuation. That can't be too common.

      But that other post is by sucati (611768) and not you! I'm sure this is all a coincidence and it would be quite wrong of me to call you an asto-turfing little cocksucker with multiple sock puppet accounts on this evidence alone.

    2. Re:i returned mine and bought a windows mobile pda by honold · · Score: 1

      is this really a pressing issue in your life?

      i am not sucati, and i don't know sucati. i have nothing to do with him, nokia, dell, microsoft, or any other company in the pda/umpc space. i'm just a consumer that bought a 770. it sucked, so i returned it and picked up something that didn't. it's only coincidence that someone else apparently had the good sense to do the same.

  70. A minute to boot? by jd · · Score: 1
    Ouch! LinuxBIOS takes 5 seconds to boot a basic system, and it wouldn't take much to save a memory image of a booted GUI, which could then be pulled in through suspend2. True, this would probably require another chip, and space on these systems is always extremely tight, but if you can slash a 60 second boot time to under 10, there'll be a bigger market, even if the device is larger.


    If your GUI can be crammed into the kernel, say by seriously mutilating KGI or framebuffers to provide everything you need directly, then have your desktop as an init replacement, you could even get away without a pre-booted image.


    The next step after that would be to have the kernel run in non-volatile RAM, so that if the machine is turned off and back on, the system doesn't need to reboot at all. NVR is slower than volatile, so it would depend on whether the last few seconds of boot time were more obnoxious than the degradation in performance.


    The power problem should be easy for them to fix - you simply enable CPU frequency scaling, then scale the speed of the CPU so that it never runs faster than the slowest speed that isn't painful for the applications you're running. So the more you run, the faster the device runs (up to maximum speed) so that performance remains fairly constant but doesn't waste power idling for the next task. My guess is that this would improve the lifespan of the battery by a fair amount.


    If wireless is a power killer, then it might be wise to look at the wireless device for opportunities. For example, there's no point blasting out full power when the remote device is right next to you, so don't transmit more power than needed to get a working signal to the WAP. Although the received power wouldn't be enough to drive the network chips, it would be enough to drive a transistor to let the device know that a nearby signal is present (although it wouldn't be good enough to detect any signal within the normal range of the wireless device). There may also be more energy-efficient wireless NIC chips out there, which could save on power.


    I imagine power is also why cryptography isn't really supported. There are plenty of crypto chips (Motorola's S1 looks good) and those will take less power than doing crypto in software. All it would take is adding the necessary hooks to OpenSSL's crypto engine support. Problem solved.


    So if I'm so smart, why aren't I building these and making myself rich? Well, I don't have a few million dollars to burn. Nor do I have a red paperclip. (That guy HAS to be Ferrengi!)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:A minute to boot? by thaWhat · · Score: 1

      Thank you sir, for our first coherent post. Problems clearly identified, workable solutions put forward. Would you agree that the issues here require more of a hardware-oriented solution than one in software; ie: 'let's understand the obstacles that the hardware has thrown at us and deal with them in a hardware-appropriate manner rather than the software-is-broken-so-we-write-more-software pseudo-solution'. This is a 'phone dammit, not a desktop/laptop. I have a Nokia 6230i that takes 30 seconds to shake it's head and take a look around when i get off the 'plane, my first mobile was ready in about 3 seconds... Something to do with being more hardware-centric, i guess...

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a thumb.
  71. It does what I need it to do and it does it well. by partridge · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been carrying one of these around for the last 6 months or so, and while it has its flaws, it's still a great device to have.

    When I'm wandering around with a baby/toddler strapped to me/in tow, the last thing I need to be lugging around is more stuff, even the lightest of laptops, nor do I want to carry anything as fragile or expensive as a laptop.

    On the other hand, all the coffee shops around here are temptingly WiFi enabled, and there are a plethora of open networks around.

    Having this device comfortably stowed in my pocket means that I can get some surfing and email in while the little guy takes his naps, just about wherever and whenever that happens to be. If I'm out of range of an open Wifi network, bluetooth to the cellphone works just as well.

    It might not be a desktop browser, but it absolutely beats the pants off of ANY browser running on a cellphone, and the 800 pixel wide screen is enough to open webpages without side scrolling.

    The email client sucks. I've been using webmail which works just as well until the software update comes out.

    This is not a consumer level device yet. I would probably best describe it as an open beta-test. But for the price and convenience it's a great thing to have around if you know how to work with it. That, and it can run nethack.

  72. It wasn't MEANT to do all that much by Jahf · · Score: 1

    This device was a proof of concept and after hours pet project of the designer and a few others. It wasn't necessarily MEANT to be a PDA/laptop/whatever replacement. It is a gadget built by and for gadget lovers. Is there alot you have to do to make it do what you want? yeah, but it CAN do it and that's 1/2 the cool. The people who want it are picking it up faster than Nokia expected (hence its low availability when it first launched).

    Its also awesome for people who want to develop on an embedded platform that mimics platforms used by cellphones. It is a TI OMAP 1710, same as a very popular TI reference architecture, and has built-in bluetooth and WiFi. A VERY cheap development target compared to the 4K you'd spend on an OMAP 1710 reference kit. And the environment can be developed on your x86 box and easily cross-compiled to the 770.

    The screen (800x400) is -very- nice if you do take the time to install your apps. I have very little problem reading the small text because it is crisp ... very crisp.

    All in all it is what it was meant to be ... the reviewer seems to have wanted it to be something else. Anyone who knows how to compile and/or install linux software is going to find it quite fun.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  73. get a Hiptop instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, what you want is a Danger Hiptop (available from T-Mobile). It's cheaper, better designed, has a nicer keyboad, and is easier to use than the Blackberry.

  74. Yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "almost as many crashes as an unpatched Win98 install"

    Because after patching Win98 is because a stable powerhouse of an OS... wait.

  75. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't comment about the 770 as I (still) don't own one, but this article reminds me that last time I checked, Bill Gates' wife was in the Washington Post board of directors. This and the fact that Microsoft recently announced a similar product (origami) should make us think about that article.

  76. Newton by alcmaeon · · Score: 1
    "For these devices to succeed they have to be amenable to absolute manipulation in the same way that standard, non-digital physical objects are, and that's a mighty challenge that I don't think anyone has been able to succeed at to date."

    The Newton was darn close with the latest revision, the 2100. With today's technology, it would be possible for Apple to make a device that could truely replace a notebook, but clearing the user-adoption hurdle woudl be a real challenge. Notebooks just serve their purpose very well and people are very used to them.

  77. nice 8) by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    and fun. thank you for the laugh 8)

    Yes, maybe I shoud have added 'girlfriend friendly" in my needs 8p

    I do have a linux box, already LAMPised, a PS-2 port IR receptor that came with one HP4000 Laserjet that might be an emitter too and enough PS-2 cable to put it from the computer room("where old hardware comes to die") to the living room ("where brand new, shiny very expensive top of the line hardware never came").

    And I think I can get the missup to accept one more cable running the corners.

    So your solution has already be given some consideration

    But I am looking for a less "nerd-ghetto-project" solution...for now

    Even more when it can be more easily solved by just a 10 meters RS-MMC format IR emitter...which I didn't find anywhere....

    Maybe that's where the soldering iron comes in play 8)

    And the Guts needed to insert your newbie made pile of electronic into your brand new N770...

    Oh, the burns ! 8p

    On another hand, there are some nifty IR repeaters that can do what I want without problem. they just cost another 300-400eu.

    Still not the "All in One - ready made - Ultimate Remote" I'm looking for 8(...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    1. Re:nice 8) by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Not really too "getto" here is a great solution for you
      First here is a site that tells you how to add two serial ports to a WRT54G
      http://www.rwhitby.net/wrt54gs/serial.html

      Here is a link to lirc http://www.lirc.org/
      It also includes a link to a home made ir transmitter that interfaces to a serial port.

      So here you have a linux box with wifi , Ethernet ports, and an IR port. It would also make a good wifi bridge for an XBox and or a PS-2.
      Put Boa on it and PHP or perl and you could make a web based interface for your hardware devices. It should even be girl friend friendly and not all that ugly.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  78. frryyy by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    Wow, I've never seen "yadda yadda yadda" abbreviated before. I'm impressed!

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  79. Ideally... by jd · · Score: 1
    ...everything would be done in hardware. When using software, you expend energy moving each operation from memory to the processor, in addition to data. Hardware implementations involve moving just the data and only from the last processing element to the next, with extremely limited logic. This is all power-saving on a massive scale.


    In practice, nobody writes complex programs purely in hardware any more. It's much more power-efficient, it is usually faster, but there's a price to pay. It takes more space and it's often impossible to update. In consequence, the optimal solution is a compromise - not realy "pure" hardware solutions, but still "mostly" hardware with a bunch of programmable registers and gates.


    Even then, this won't do everything you'd want. You still need some software. But it should be kept to an absolute minimum, for a low-power device. Software is cheap on space, but costly on power. It is also dog-slow, which means that you need faster (and therefore more power-hungry) CPUs just to get the same performance.


    Ok, given that, what needs to be done to wring as much performance as possible, for as little power? Offload engines for CPU-intensive work (such as cryptography) is an obvious must. You also really want offload engines for anything that is used frequently enough that even a small saving would make a huge impact. A good memory manager would be useful, by that reasoning.


    You also want to use every trick in the book to squeeze resources as far as possible. If the CPU is only doing something 50% of the time, then halve the clock rate. Don't waste power on NO-OPs. You don't need to have a fully-powered network card to detect the presence of a signal - use the signal's own power for detection purposes. I'm not sure if arial types are mandated, but if not, three loop arials at 90' to each other (with only the arial with the strongest signal being in use) would reduce your power requirements for transmit significantly.


    Ok, so you've used every trick in the book (and written three further volumes besides) to save power through hardware where at all humanly possible. What else can you do?


    Reduce the workload the software needs to do. By freezing images and restoring them, you eliminate startup requirements on time and power. By compiling with profiling, then compiling using the profiling to improve optimization, you can reduce space requirements by a fair amount. Eliminate costly programs (such as X) and use KGI or Framebuffer instead to eliminate a lot of overhead on space, power and internal bandwidth.


    So there's a mix of software and hardware solutions, but it is NEVER more software, and it is ESSENTIAL that the software and hardware is squeezed as much as possible.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  80. UMM i am guesing you mean the 6700 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well i also own a 6700, and it is very nice. But this device is almost the same size as the 6700 AND it has a much larger, much more expensive screen.PLus it is half the price. Hopefully the next iterations will have a keyboard!

  81. Misinformed "review" by Werrismys · · Score: 1
    I have had Nokia 770 for a month or so, and it's just about the best portable I've come across. It does not crash, battery life is good, it connects fine with various brands of WLAN access points. The screen is excellent (almost 3x the resolution of PSP) and the thing really fits in pocket.

    It's easy to modify since it's Linux-based. Putting a swap file on mem card is easy.

    Plus it's the best platform for old Lucasarts games, desktop computers included (scummvm ;-)

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack