Slashdot Mirror


FirefoxFlicks Winners Announced

prostoalex writes "The FirefoxFlicks competition has announced the winners of the Firefox video promo campaign. The winning videos are DareDevil, Wheee!, Fox Fever, This is Hot and Give me the the soap."

210 comments

  1. Weee IMO was the best... by gregbains · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...Only because it is the only one I ever saw, based on viral ability alone it wins

    1. Re:Weee IMO was the best... by Skidge · · Score: 1

      It is amusing and has that rewatchablity that viral marketing needs, but it kind of makes firefox seem like a boring whiner. ;)

    2. Re:Weee IMO was the best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      Weee was the worest piece of crap in the entire Flicks submissions. It doesn't belong on TV on any channel. If that thing airs on tv, it will turn people off to Firefox.

      Give me the Soap one is the best one.

    3. Re:Weee IMO was the best... by Narishma · · Score: 1
      it will turn people off to Firefox
      That's the purpose, isn't it ? ;)
      --
      Mada mada dane.
    4. Re:Weee IMO was the best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's been renamed "Wii".

    5. Re:Weee IMO was the best... by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was confused by it. IE apparently is mentally challenged, but very busy. Safari is bored (maybe no one is using it?), and apparently Firefox is really just a reflection by 99% of its users (willing to complain about IE, but not willing to do anything of their own to fix the problem). Who wants a browser that sleeps all day and whines at IE?

      A better take on the same idea would be to display all of the icons at the same time, IE can go "whee" but keeps running into stuff and getting disoriented and diseased and then dies. Safari can be bored if it wants to, and Firefox should look like it actually getting something done.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Weee IMO was the best... by chadliness · · Score: 1

      I think the idea, which admittedly is not very clear, is that other browsers are annoying. Firefox, on the other hand, silently gets the job done. Who hasn't experienced a time when they just wished a program would shut up? This ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPS18_XzoaE&search= firefoxflicks perhaps shows that idea a little more clearly.

      I showed all the movies to my non-technical roomate and this was the ad he wanted to see a couple more times. Later I heard him making the "wheee" sound. It's very addicting.

    7. Re:Weee IMO was the best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Of course not. It is to get people to download Firefox. Unfortunately, this flick will force people to change the channel before the end of the flick. The whole "Weee" thing is so annoying on so many levels. Flick should be subtle, yet let people know those is an alternative browser.

  2. Speaking Of Hot by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Speaking of hot flicks, I think that's a pretty good description of their server right about now.

  3. Wonder who's paying the bills for bandwidth by ziplux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mozilla presumably needs all the funding they can get. Where are they getting the money to pay for a site like this?

    1. Re:Wonder who's paying the bills for bandwidth by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Apparently nobody as it's already been slashdotted to a molten oblivion. Whoopsie...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:Wonder who's paying the bills for bandwidth by Beuno · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, that isn't so true:Mozilla made $72 million from Firefox

    3. Re:Wonder who's paying the bills for bandwidth by psu_whammy · · Score: 1

      I'm sure all those Google searches from that tiny little search thing in the address bar fills their Fox-hole quite nicely.

    4. Re:Wonder who's paying the bills for bandwidth by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      Bandwith isn't nearly as expensive as some people think.

      For example I pay 40 Euros for 100GB. And that includes the rent for the hardware.

      So let's say 1 million people download a 10 MB video. That's 10 000 GB or 4000 Euros (probably less for that kind of volume). Sure that's serious money for an individual, but easily paid even by organizations that rely on donations.

    5. Re:Wonder who's paying the bills for bandwidth by sd.fhasldff · · Score: 1

      The whole thing is running via "Revver.com". Looks like a Google Video / YouTube et. al. clone. Their tagline is "Revverize your videos. Share them with the world. Make money."

      You don't suppose THEY are funding the bandwidth, do you? I mean, they are getting some massive exposure here and in a crowded video-market, that has to be worth something. There was a comparison linked on the /. front page the other day between a whole bunch of sites like this, but Revver.com with all its Revverizing potential was nowhere to be found. This seems like an effective way of getting some attention.

      Or maybe not, seeing as how people seemingly believe Mozilla is hosting it all.

  4. by far the funniest and most clever (IMO) by yagu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wheee! Almost peed my pants. Played it over and over, this is funny on many levels, reminds me of the old Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoons, where little kids laughed, but there is an adult element that is hilarious.

    As far as being effective for general advertising, I'm not sure... It may succeed on the level of getting people talking about it, "Do you GET that new Firefox commercial", or not. It's a bit of a wink and a nod to the tech demographic (taunting especially Microsoft and Netscape).

    If I were making a SAFE choice for mass consumption, I'd probably go with the "Give me the Soap". Simple, mass appeal, cute, cuddly, with a clearly stated message. If I had some extra money, I'd produce and run both. If I had money to burn, I'd definitely do the Wheeee! just for fun.

    Good job to all winners.

    1. Re:by far the funniest and most clever (IMO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "give me the the soap", that's what it says it's called, right in the /. article...

    2. Re:by far the funniest and most clever (IMO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You almost peed your pants because a bunch of stupidly animated browser logos? wow.

      Personally, "This is Hot" was probably the best one out of the three that i got from google video, but even that smacks of "We're spending all our effort on marketing the same browser instead of making the actual program better!"

      What does it matter if they run an ad on TV and thousands of people download firefox? Use that money to fix the memory issues and Mac port, not on useless ads to pat yourselves on the back.

    3. Re:by far the funniest and most clever (IMO) by compm375 · · Score: 1

      ads = more downloads = more money (google searchbox)
      Then Mozilla can fix memory issues and the Mac port, having more money than they started with. This is not just patting
        themselves on the back.

    4. Re:by far the funniest and most clever (IMO) by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      mozilla is a business. Through affiliate programs (mostly google, but also amazon.com) your web searches brought in 72 million in cash to the mofo last year.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:by far the funniest and most clever (IMO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. FunNnnnn Nnnn.... Nnnn... Funniest. Movie. Ever.

  5. Well... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The site is down already... To google video, huzzah!

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  6. And the loser is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And the loser is...

    The FirefoxFlicks Server!

    Already getting database errors.

  7. I still liked the Firefox promotional rap better by setirw · · Score: 1

    Firefox rap by "Fox_E_Mama."

    http://www.spreadfirefox.com/node/15403

    and the audio: http://www.archive.org/details-db.php?mediatype=au dio&identifier=FoxEMama

    --
    This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
  8. Apparently they made making a lot of money by figleaf · · Score: 0, Redundant
  9. Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by DerGeist · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here are the Google Video links (Fox Fever and "Give me the soap" aren't available there unfortunately):

    Daredevil
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-792586116 8172379089&q=daredevil&pl=true

    whee
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-659548685 5266134260&q=wheee!&pl=true

    Fox Fever
    -couldn't find it, sorry-

    This is Hot
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2466919931 565393234&q=this+is+hot+firefox&pl=true

    Give me the the soap
    -couldn't find it, sorry-

    I looked all over for mirrors of the two missing videos. Couldn't find any working ones, sorry.

    1. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by emannigol · · Score: 0, Redundant
    2. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Gotta say the "Whee" video is embarrassingly stupid. Firefox making fun of Safari in any way, shape, or form is sort of like Kirstie Alley calling Mariah Carey "fat."

    3. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I guess if all you ever use is Safari I could see how you would think it's good.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      The downloads are still working, they seem to be blocking /.

      http://www.firefoxflicks.com/flick/index.php?id=21 146&c=false
      http://www.firefoxflicks.com/flick/index.php?id=19 836&c=false

      Fox Fever, and Give me the the soap
      Paste them into a new tab.
      Wish I could put up a torrent.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    5. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you honestly trying to say Firefox is a better browser than Safari? If you need specific sites that only work in Gecko, like Google Maps for the first week it was out, I can see why you'd want to keep something like Camino as a backup. But Firefox? It may be adequate for people used to the types of misanthropic interfaces prevalent on Windows and Linux, but among Mac applications, Firefox stands out for its mediocrity. Even Camino has problems rendering text without jagged, uneven kerning, not to mention "undead widget" syndrome.

      No, I simply don't understand how anyone can reasonably say Firefox is a decent browser for day-to-day use, at least not when better options like Safari are available.

    6. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      No, what I'm really saying is this is all opinions and I have no absolutes to offer. Nor will I accept any. I just came off a little harsh initially.

      I don't like the way Safari behaves. It does braindead things with the proxy in my office, for instance, amongst other things. Firefox is shitty on Mac, I'll admit, but that's more the fault of the Mac being a second class citizen in the Firefox world. Camino is the best compromise for me because it behaves sanely in the most circumstances for me.

      I disagree with your interface complaints (the misanthropic comment). As someone who uses 5 different GUI systems on a daily basis, I assure you Mac has its share of UI stupidity that makes me wonder how people can be so zealotrous. When you're used to it (or use it exclusively) it may not be as prominent, but it's there.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    7. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by fean · · Score: 1

      jagged, uneven kerning,

      When I can reliably customize kerning without stupid hacks, I'll consider this arguement...

      "undead widget" syndrome.

      I don't even know what this is, since Firefox doesn't have widgets.

      misanthropic interfaces

      While I realize that your Fanboy attitude would seem ineffective (and ineffectual) without throwing insults, I have a feeling that misanthropic wasn't quite the right word (next time try a dictionary to find out the meaning of words before you use them). I think what you meant to say was:

      Firefox should have a brushed metal interface d00d! Also the address bar acting as the progress bar is uber-kewl!!!!! Pardon the fact that my misanthropic views focus on Firefox, but they naturally scorn anything that seems to be popular at the moment.

      Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Safari (while rendering might be better, lack of extensions balances out this grievance), this comment is purely aimed at your "Steve Jobs is God" fanboy attitude and your flamebait comment.

    8. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Misanthropic" is exactly the right word to describe the hatred of humanity that many, many Windows and Linux developers must feel to ship products with UIs the likes of which would send any halfway decent Mac programmer running, screaming, from the dungeon wherein he or she had the misfortune to encounter such beasts. I choose my words carefully. Don't insult my intelligence. And do some research before you spread falsehoods regarding what you perceive to be deficiencies in Safari--ultimately, all they reveal is your ignorance.

    9. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't insult my intelligence

      From the looks of those two posts, there isn't a lot to insult. You haven't actually come out with one decent argument. Just a load of mindless ranting Mac fanboyism.

    10. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      How far down your throat is Ben Goodger's cock that you can't admit "renders text like shit" is a valid criticism of Firefox? There are more, but let's focus on the one for now; I don't want to overtask your simple mind.

    11. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by fean · · Score: 1

      Boy, you sure showed me... good thing there is a site that offers up some for-pay extensions (two of the three listed on their site are, by all rights, NOT freeware)...

      And what gems the "Essentials" are (same ratio, 2 of 3 are for-pay)!!!

      We have PithHelmet = Adblock + $10 fee
      SafariStand = ?? Block Plugins, Has a "StandBar", Colors Source Code... (the home page sure doesn't say what it does)
      Saft = $6 and adds some (actually) great features, things I think should be built into Safari AND Firefox:draggable tabs, full-screen browsing, searchable bookmarks and history, URL shortcuts, kiosk mode and more... (well, the full-screen browsing, URL Shortcuts, Kiosk Mode are all in Firefox, and the searchable bookmarks and history were in Firefox 2.0, but they've been taken out, damn them!)

      Boy... I sure was wrong, looks like there's no limit to what you can do with Safari, If you have the money to spend $6-10 for every extension... Of course, a majority of people(and all of them that sit on the FanBoy squad) who own macs(excepting the iMac/Mini) are upper-middle class, hence it's their priviledge to bitch about how Firefox's goal is to render pages the same, regardless of which platform they're viewed on.

      Firefox doesn't render text like shit, it renders it consistantly... They don't implement features that are OS-Dependant.

      Oh, but I do have to admit, you're definitely correct on the view that every programmer that programs for linux or windows hates humanity, it's a good thing we have Mac developers that love humanity, who else would we pay absurd prices for software to?

    12. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      Firefox doesn't render consistently between platforms. Text rendering on OS X, when it happens properly, relies on ATSUI, and looks better than it does in Windows or any Linux desktop I've seen. The trouble is that even though Firefox uses ATSUI, it doesn't use it properly, and so its text looks terrible more often than not, what with the uneven linespacing and inconsistent antialiasing. Of course, if you're the sort of crass, classless, ass-picking meathead who isn't bothered by living in a dirty, depraved world of shit, Firefox's slovenly habits won't bother you, and you'll never understand why the rest of us prefer Safari. So be it.

    13. Re:Google Video links (all but 2 videos available) by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, the guy who runs that site I pointed out (www.pimpmysafari.com)? Jon Hicks? He's the guy who designed the Firefox logo and icon, before Safari came out. That's right--the Firefox developers, or at least those with good taste, are jumping ship to Safari. Now ask yourself why that would be.

  10. bad links by hjo3 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Connection to database could not be made." Great post. You'd think that when people submit stuff like this they'd think ahead and provide mirror links...

  11. Rubbish by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I watched them all, and was completely underwhelmed. For one thing, they were obviously all the same. Secondly though, black text on a white background saying 'Connection to database could not be made.' just isn't funny, and doesn't make me want to use FireFox. It's also stretching the definition of 'video' too. Yes, technically it was something that was seen, and therefore video, but in common usage 'video' implies moving pictures.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Rubbish by nsupathy · · Score: 1

      The youtube links are working fine (as of now). I found the soap one quite good and hilarious which will appeal to adults.

      --
      #include std_disclaimer.h
    2. Re:Rubbish by codefungus · · Score: 1

      No man. You got it all wrong. Apparently there is something wrong with that web site. Equally apparently, all the videos are on the same web site. I hope they fix their web site. I want to watch those videos!!!!

      --
      -- A cat is no trade for integrity!
    3. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have health coverage, you might see if it covers getting your ability to detect sarcasm and dry humor diagnosed.

    4. Re:Rubbish by Flame0001 · · Score: 1

      If his sarcasm were a snake it would've... Well, you know the rest.

      --
      Slashdot, the only place where intellectuals can act like idiots... and still sound intellectual.
    5. Re:Rubbish by jZnat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's bad enough that all the Flicks are in Quicktime formats, and then YouTube has to drag in more proprietary shit (Flash) just to view a goddamned video file. Where's the love?

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    6. Re:Rubbish by codefungus · · Score: 1

      ... :)

      --
      -- A cat is no trade for integrity!
  12. Wheee is hot by WRoach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Put the design skills behind This is Hot with the Wheee! concept and you got a real winner.

    1. Re:Wheee is hot by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. 'Wheee!' works because its simplistic, playfull and silly. 'This is hot' works because it's beautifully rendered with breathtaking scenes.

      A combination would result in dissonance. It's difficult to simulatneously acheive the "wow effect" of spectacular cinematography while keeping the playful siliness.

    2. Re:Wheee is hot by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      I think each individual 'flick' was generally underwhelming. While they all had something to offer and generally had good concepts, they tended to be poorly realized, i.e. not enough expansion of concept. Case in point: Briefcase. I loved the idea, but they skipped from point to point too quickly for the meaning to sink in. As a firefox user, I assume that this would be worse if it were shown to people that don't know about firefox.
      The surfing one again had a good idea, but the voice-over and shots failed to capture me. I assume the video was supposed to look beautiful and awesome, but it didn't seem to achieve this - although that could be a result of the quality and size. I think "Give Me the Soap" was the one that will be most appealing, easiest to understand, and had professional enough shooting to qualify as an actual advert - out of the five listed. Looking through the other ones, some stand out as better, IMHO.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
  13. bah databases by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since the site is a pile of smoldering wreckage, let's talk about something else: the web. Specifically, when did you start needed a database to serve up five static files?

    Discuss amongst yourselves.

    1. Re:bah databases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, he's joking, but the database serves the over 250 entries that were submitted.

    2. Re:bah databases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could've at least compressed them better, so here's all 250 files in a self-extracting Perl script: W@$T%^Y}U&GF"%

    3. Re:bah databases by flooey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Specifically, when did you start needed a database to serve up five static files?

      This is the site for all of the applicants, designed to serve up thousands of files and related information that have been uploaded by users. That seems like a good use of a database to me.

    4. Re:bah databases by thealsir · · Score: 1
      Since the site is a pile of smoldering wreckage, let's talk about something else: the web. Specifically, when did you start needed a database to serve up five static files?

      Since we start needed go to English 101.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
  14. Re:Karma whore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent down, karma whore, this post had all the mirrors long before this troll account did.

  15. wii?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kinda fun

    wiiiiiiii!!

  16. cat got my tongue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Opinions:

    surfer: like, ya, what?
    whee!: "heh", but "shut UP" voice not authoritative enough.
    eskimos: cute
    soap: fix the ugly animation of the logo appearing as the washer lid shuts
    firefox fever: explorer was kind of funny. only in the slashdot-funny sense, where you don't laugh, or smile, but sort of recognize that someone else might possibly find it funny.

  17. New buzzword.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

    I can't wait to see this response to every IE post on slashdot.

  18. Re:Karma whore? by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    At the time I went to post, the other post wasn't visible yet, slashdot takes a couple minutes to update after posts are made.

  19. Wiiiiiiii! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad Whee! was a winner. They'll have a hell of a time getting it past Nintendo now.

    Maybe Microsoft will hire Gill for their Xbox campaign? ;)

  20. Analysis by blair1q · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Daredevil. What's this about? Nice editing, pretty sweet cinematography (if extremely dark due to heavy use of solar silhouetting). Nice little homily about the surfing ethic. And the kid skateboarding with the surfboard is cool too. But there's no surfing in it. There's skateboarding. Looks too cold to surf. And too dark. Confused.

    2. This is hot. Predictable. I liked the touch with the fish. Too bad it didn't hold that note.

    3. Wheee! Cute, but the payoff is lame. Firefox just wants to sleep? Confused again.

    4. Get the Soap. Dumb. No text, sub- or otherwise, to indicate why the kids think washing gets rid of viruses and spyware. Only the soap-on-the-lens thing keeps it from being dead last. Oh, and the fact that this one could never be anything but:

    5. Fox Fever. Ultra-dumb. Lame beyond words. Everything that's wrong about the vox populi artistic movement. How did this hunk of shit get out of the in-box, much less into this list?

    That's muh rulin'. - Judge R. Bean

    1. Re:Analysis by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One man's Troll is another man's Insightful. The ads had good concepts (particularly the eskimos one...) but they didn't quite deliever that *punch*. They were all missing something. I think most of them could be saved with some refinement. The "weee" ad, for example, was pretty funny. But would somebody unaware of FF get it? Would they even know what the other icons were about? The soap one made FF look like some version of Norton. None of them showed FF's tabs, which amazes me because that is one of the easiest ways to get somebody to switch from IE.

      The point isn't to pick on poor defenseless FireFox here, but rather that it'd be nice to see these ads refined after receiving some critique. You dudes with mod points: Be a little more open minded.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Analysis by djm181 · · Score: 1

      Who modded this as a troll!? This guy is making perfectly valid criticisms!

    3. Re:Analysis by springbox · · Score: 1
      3. Wheee! Cute, but the payoff is lame. Firefox just wants to sleep? Confused again.

      Firefox doesn't want to sleep. It just wants the other browsers to shut up because they're being completely annoying (and stupid.) I thought this was the best video and people with even a little bit of knowledge about browsers can understand it.

    4. Re:Analysis by Zaplocked · · Score: 1

      Get the Soap. Dumb. No text, sub- or otherwise, to indicate why the kids think washing gets rid of viruses and spyware.

      I think the fact that they are children make it pretty self explanatory - the childlike misinterpretation of their father's comments of "cleaning" the junk off their computer should make the commercial understood by anyone remotely familiar with spyware, viruses, and children.

    5. Re:Analysis by kratei · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sigh, I wish I had not just burned my mod points elsewhere. As the other two posts above me said, the parent here is not trolling (glad people with mod points fixed that!). I went (GC), I watched, and I can't fully disagree with him. He is harsh, but really, can't we do better than these five?

      1. This is Hot. Best of the lot. But, it does remind me of some other adverts out there - so blair1q is right: it is predictable.

      2.Give me the soap. - If they are looking for middle age family types this is the one. Lame, yes, but it would work with non-geek types.

      3.Daredevil - Not bad. This one might actually cut it outside of geekdom. But, this isn't going to do well outside so cal and young people.

      4. Fox Fever - lame, but might work.

      5. Whee. - Give me a break. Funny: check. Makes fun of other lame browsers: check. Gives anti-microshaft people a good laugh: check. Would come off well on prime time TV: no way no how.

    6. Re:Analysis by fermion · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think this is what is up with daredevil. Let's assume that form the most part, the average adult equates the internet with IE. In other words, when they want to browse, the say I need to open the internet, but what they do is open IE. These people are lost. Let's further assume that, like in most households I know, the kids are the tech support. This commercial is therefore targeted to the middle school group who has some control over the computer. These kids will respond to the little girl, as the girl does not tell anyone what to do, but merely equates the use of a product with a life style. It is how we got kids to smoke, and how we now get kids to go to McDonalds. It is how we get kids who are really to young to care about fashion to spend huge amounts of thier parents money on products they do not comprehend. It is a winning, if somewhat unethical, formula.

      Oh, and I belive skateboarding was invented by surfers so they could keep in shape when they could not surf. So, for the vast majority of kids who do not surf, skateboarding a much more accessible connection.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:Analysis by Curien · · Score: 1

      I have plenty of knowledge about browsers, thanks (I use Opera). I didn't get it. I didn't think it was funny. I thought it was annoying and didn't make a point. (Firefox makes the other browsers less annoying?)

      I thought the soap one was good. Amusing, cute, and makes a valid point.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    8. Re:Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I agree with your comment about "Whee". There's a fine line between silly funny, and really freaking annoying. You have to keep in mind that just because you thought it was funny doesn't mean everyone will. I could see a LOT of people finding out what Fifefox was only to say "You mean like that stupid annoying commercial? I HATE that commercial".

      That's not the impression I would want to make.

    9. Re:Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That Fox Forever chick was kinda hot, which detracts from the message by possibly causing 'popups'

    10. Re:Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's your contribution (except for your bad review)?

    11. Re:Analysis by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1

      What was your entry?

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    12. Re:Analysis by Moose,The · · Score: 1

      Excellent critique.

      "This is hot" seems to have some potential. This is one that the average person (who hasn't heard of Firefox) should be able to relate to. I'd say this is the best of the bunch.

      "Wheee!" is cute (as you say), but it doesn't seem that the Average Joe will get the point here -- or in that case even know what these icons are. Nonetheless, entertaining to those of us who already use Firefox.

      "Fox Fever" is terrible. Please don't show that to anyone ever again.

      "Get the Soap" and "Daredevil" were both a bit blah to me. Not terrible, but not great either. Particularly, I don't think "Daredevil" ever really made the connection between surfing (skateboarding?) and Firefox. I was a bit lost.

    13. Re:Analysis by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I thought this was the best video and people with even a little bit of knowledge about browsers can understand it."

      Okay. So why would those people need a FireFox ad?

      Preaching to the choir.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:Analysis by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with the "Whee" film is that if you can understand it, you already know Firefox well enough to be outside of the target audience for the film (people who don't know Firefox).

      So yes it is in a way an amusing little film (I found the Safari icon quite funny) although it could stand some refining, maybe a voice-over (such as "should your web browsing be glittery, boring or efficient"), but it's not a good ad.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    15. Re:Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where was your analysis?

      Granted, I thought his analysis of the videos sucked ass, but then you go and disgrace yourself with such a lame retort. As a member of the viewing audience for which these videos were created, he has every right to play the role of critic. That's how it works: you create something for someone else to see. Their reaction is part of the process.

      By your logic, you could never display dislike for a video game or work of art, because "where's YOUR video game?" or "where's YOUR Picaso?".

      Logical Fallacy: It's What's For Dinner!

    16. Re:Analysis by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of your analysis of what was picked. The winners were kinda boring, kinda unprofessional, compared to some of the others.

      My favorites were:

      • This is Hot - for the 3-D animation
      • Briefcase Syndicate - for the acting and the transitions in the music. The guerilla fans were kinda cool, though maybe not the best image for Firefox
      • Upgrade - Most professional, good music, simple
      • Give Me the Soap - for the kids, dad is kinda lame
      • Smells Fantastic - It's just so bizarre, would work (imagine seeing that during the Super Bowl)
    17. Re:Analysis by blair1q · · Score: 1

      A troll moderator.

      The system tends to discourage trolls from becoming moderators, but it's not infallible. And nothing pleases everyone. Some people drink the kool-aid and ignore validity to justify their own blind fealty. And sometimes, the people being criticized are the ones with the mod points, so there's that to battle.

    18. Re:Analysis by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Did he say "cleaning"?

      I didn't hear it.

    19. Re:Analysis by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Those who can, do.

      Those who can teach, criticize.

      Those who can not even operate a login prompt, post as anonymous cowards.

    20. Re:Analysis by Khomar · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      Accomplished entertainment and advertising judges -- including the talents behind Charlie's Angels, American Pie, and Six Feet Under -- had the difficult job of selecting the winners.

      Uh... okay. Not exactly the films that I would look for for talent, but...

      "Dare Devil" and "This is Hot" are at least done in a professional way, but as I watch some of the other entries, I am blown away that these judges chose the five that they did. What about "Improve", "Sunday Morning", or even "Upgrade"? And those are just the first few I have watched. They look professional (or at least more professional), and they raise awareness. Many of the "winners" seem to be only to promote the feeling that Firefox is a hack browser -- not serious competition in the real world. Firefox needs professional advertising to show that it is "the real deal". I think they need to look for new judges.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    21. Re:Analysis by morie · · Score: 1

      2. Gimme the soap

      Main respronse will be: Cute (thing OMG Ponies etc)

      Childern sell, and I know for a fact that my girlfriend will pick this as het favorite comercial "ever".

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    22. Re:Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inference
      Pronunciation: 'in-f&-r&ns
      Function: noun
      1 : the act or process of inferring; specifically : the act of passing from one proposition, statement, or judgment considered as true to another whose truth is believed to follow logically from that of the former
      2 : something inferred; especially : a proposition arrived at by inference --see also permissive presumption at PRESUMPTION
      3 : the premises and conclusions of a process of inferring

  21. My favorite: This is hot by BrianWCarver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Saw them all through the Google Cache. (I can't function without the Add Mirrors Greasemonkey Script which IMHO is way better than the Slashdotter Extension.)

    Anyway, I thought "This is hot" blew all the others away. High production value. Gets some of the firefox message across to a mass audience without getting buried in all the product details. Most of the others will just leave people confused.

    --
    Like Digital Freedoms? Then donate to EFF before they're gone.
    1. Re:My favorite: This is hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would strongly agree with you. This is hot had the best production values, and told me exactly what they were trying to "sell." The winner had nothing to do with firefox, didn't get me interested in the product and was boring. Weee! was mostly annoying though I kind of laughed when the IE icon exploded. The kids with the soap was sort of good, but are they advertising for a browser or anti spyware software. On its own that's not what firefox is though it does offer some protection. The other ones were just .. meh.

    2. Re:My favorite: This is hot by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. "This is hot" is absolutely the best ad to use.

    3. Re:My favorite: This is hot by Qbertino · · Score: 1

      Right on. Putting that shaky-cam homevideo on #2 is a plain insult.
      Goes to show the blockheads sad and sorry inability for marketing.

      Same with Mambo that became 'Joomla!'. Great CMS, crappy name.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  22. Re:you call that a mirror? by Poltras · · Score: 0

    You call this a mirror?
    THIS is a mirror.

  23. Get me the soap by mikesd81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I watched them and definitely Get Me The Soap is the best. The idea of washing the computer to get rid of viruses if funny, only because kids are so litereal now. If I was to see that on TV I would be kinda confused as to what firefox is, because, IMO, the average user just uses IE because they don't know about others, except maybe Netscape. The only thing I would add is on the GetFireFox.com logo @ the end put Get FireFox Interenet Browser to clarify what it is.

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:Get me the soap by Dadoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I was to see that on TV I would be kinda confused as to what firefox is, because, IMO, the average user just uses IE because they don't know about others

      You know, you bring up a good point, here. If the goal of this contest is to get an ad that will attract more users to Firefox, none of them are any good. We all understand the commercials, because we're geeks, but there's nothing in any of them that gives the average person a clue what they're talking about. Bummer.

      That said, I really liked "Weeee!" and "Get the Soap" best.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    2. Re:Get me the soap by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I think that the average user knows what FireFox is and doesn't care about it. I'm sure that they have heard of it (they don't live in a bubble) and that they understand it (they're not the "e" in the "whee" commercial). They just use IE and don't see how their lives would be much different for using FireFox.

    3. Re:Get me the soap by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      I work with people who are computer literate and yet ask me how to stop pop-ups and spyware and what not and a majority of them never heard of Opera or FireFox.

      Sure we know what it is. Especially in the Open Source world. But when you buy a computer, IE comes with it, and that's what people use until some tech friend comes over and says "Hey, this is faster and you won't get much spyware."

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    4. Re:Get me the soap by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Get FireFox Interenet Browser

      Firefox was a web browser last time I checked. I suppose one could call seamonkey an internet browser because of its email/irc/etc. support, but Firefox's great appeal is that it only supports the web (and FTP too I suppose).

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    5. Re:Get me the soap by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      Well, that makes my point. If I'm a computer enthusiast and I call Fire Fox an internet browser imagine what a non-geek thinks.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
  24. Weee Google Video Mirror by gcnaddict · · Score: 1
    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  25. Re:you call that a mirror? by gregbains · · Score: 1, Funny

    I see you've played mirror - spooney before

  26. Daredevil-ish...? by What+Is+Dot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be far more daredevil-ish to use a browser that ISN'T Firefox???

    1. Re:Daredevil-ish...? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be far more daredevil-ish to use a browser that ISN'T Firefox???

      They said "daredevil", not "suicidal". Using IE is just like going mountain-climbing with a bit of packaging string from 1800s instead of a really good rope.

      If you use Firefox, you can go to all sorts of dangerous places and the only worry you have is that your computer is broadcasting it's IP address. While if you try to use IE to do these tricks, you die.

      Any questions?

      =)

  27. Honestly... by zpeterz63 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Funniest by far in my opinion was "Wheeee!". However, I didn't really see how it did anything to promote Firefox other than by bringing opinion to it. Maybe it was something to the effect of "all the other browsers will annoy you, but Firefox won't." I don't know. Made me laugh though and I watched it multiple times.

    Not quite sure why "DareDevil" made it in there. Didn't really find it funny or informative, but it was well put together I guess. However, it did nothing to really promote firefox except for a very brief text message at the end. Again, well put together, but all but completely irrelevant to firefox.

    "Give Me the Soap". Meh, mediocre. I guess it gets the job done and we all know that cute kids doing dumb things make up all chuckle slightly and say "ahhhhh", but just didn't seem to do anything for me...

    "This is Hot" did a good job bringing out some of the plusses to firefox and didn't even need to resort to the bashing of other browsers! Kudos for that. Also, nicely animated. Very well put together piece. For those of you who claim that it doesn't make sense, how many commercials do you see on TV that make sense? Seriously, give it a break.

    I think that the clear winner in my mind though is "Fox Fever". This puts together humor and information in one short and very well done piece of work. While not as funny as "Wheee!" it still provided me with a smile and a slight chuckle. More than I managed for pretty much everything but "Wheee!". Tacked onto that we had a commercial that points out the clean browsing that you get with firefox. Even the bashing of IE was done more of less tactfully.

    OK, now that all that is out of the way, I would like to point out that I didn't see any of the other submissions. I only viewed the winners. Had I seen then, perhaps I would be more upset about who made the final cuts. Then again, I might like them all the more because the other attempts were far worse. I would like to say "good job" to any participants though. You are obviously far less lazy than me and I applaud that. Keep up the good work.

    1. Re:Honestly... by DerGeist · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Daredevil was suggesting firefox fit the surfer's lifestyle. Notice the words she uses could also easily describe firefox. It's supposed to be clever. The "my other browser is a surfboard" was supposed to be the lightbulb moment for everyone who didn't pick up on that during the commercial.

      Remember they were not aiming for a technical audience necessarily, so they picked the one they thought everyone could most relate to (in other words, instead of targeting one audience's 100% mark they figured they'd shoot for everyone's 30% mark, or whatever).

      Fox Fever was too geek-funny. Most people would just find it stupid.

      Wheee! was an excellent and clever submission but requires users to be familiar with browser icons (besides the big blue "e" that non-tech people have synonymized with the Internet).

      You're on target about "This is hot" and the soap entry would be borderline confusing to joe sixpack.

    2. Re:Honestly... by schon · · Score: 1

      The "my other browser is a surfboard" was supposed to be the lightbulb moment for everyone who didn't pick up on that during the commercial.

      Which, I think, would be everyone who didn't know in advance what it was supposed to be about.

      Of course, by the time you get to that "lightbulb" moment, the viewer has already switched the channel (or lost interest) because they were bored to tears, and they never "get" it.

      If your audience is bored, they're not going to pay attention, if they're not paying attention, they won't get your message.

    3. Re:Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they were not aiming for a technical audience necessarily

      Unfortunately, the non-technical audience has no idea what a "browser" is.

    4. Re:Honestly... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      True. That's also why even though I think that Smells Terrific is great and quite funny most people won't get it. Then again most people wouldn't get most of what Olde English produces either.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Honestly... by OneoFamillion · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, NOTHING should EVER AGAIN use MS Comic Sans.

  28. No way... by sarcasticfrench · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's saying "Connection to database cannot be made." Does that mean that firefoxflicks.com got slashdotted?! And half of slashdot users use firefox too!

    --
    This is not a sig. This is a llama-duck. Quack.
  29. Lame by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 1, Troll

    OK, am I the only one that thinks they all suck? "Hot" is the only one that's at least tolerable. The rest have no actual bearing on what they're trying to advertise, or are so campy as to be useless.

    Sorry, but, why?

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  30. question by mapkinase · · Score: 0, Redundant

    will the tagging "slashdotted" be automatically removed when the links in the article were not slashdotted anymore?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  31. Doesn't anyone use simple MPEGs anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is up with all this YouTube Flash garbage, and Google Video needing download of some software in order to be able to play a video? Why can't people just post frickin' MPEGs???

    1. Re:Doesn't anyone use simple MPEGs anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Go ahead, you pay for the bandwidth for 1,000,000 hungry slashdotters to download 5+ of your 16 MB MPEGs.

      Didn't think so. Try this: think, then post.

  32. I still like this one... by cmacb · · Score: 1

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-803097827 6585778440&q=daredevil&pl=true

    It was one of the first three out there, and it reminds me so much of real IE users: much ado about being incompetent and using and incompetent browser. The title says it all.

  33. Parent is not troll by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For fuck sakes, this is why I hate comments on Slashdot - most of the time the moderation is pretty good, until something about Microsoft comes up.

    Why can't anyone take any FireFox criticism? You'd think the Parent said "Firefox 'r dumb. IE is teh pwn". He critiqued the videos - in a nice, defined manor.

    What's good about the videos:
    Daredevil - nice cinematography, good surf-surf analogy, kind of touching. Touches on what Firefox does.
    This Is Hot - Great animation, really slick presentation. Clearly states what Firefox is and what it does.
    Whee! - Funny in a really juvenile way.
    Get the Soap - Kind of cute.
    Fox Fever - Funny in a crocodile-hunter-ripoff kind of way. Refers to a few things Firefox does.

    What's bad about the videos:
    They're all really lame. Mediocre at best. 'That Is Hot' and 'Daredevil' have great execution - but nothing to execute. There's no substance. None of the "flicks" have anything to really say.
    'Whee!' is actually quite insulting. The other browsers are retarded? That's classy. 'Fox Fever' was passable until the end when the 'explorer' showed up and was "defeated". What a cheap shot. Again, really classy. Attacking IE without any qualifiers is insulting to both Microsoft and users of both FF and IE (and Safari and Netscape), as well as Firefox - there ARE reasons why Firefox is better than IE, but they aren't mentioned.
    'Get the soap' and 'Whee!' don't even try to explain what Firefox is. Daredevil talks about "browsing" but that's about it. 'Fox Fever' is a bit better, but relies on "go to getfirefox.com for more info". 'This Is Hot' explains pretty well what Firefox does (1 out of 5 ain't bad).


    Again, I think it's important to remember that Firefox is better than IE, but not by the leaps and bounds fanboys say it is.
    "It's faster" >> well, sometimes. Sometimes it's slower. It's a crap-shoot really. And it's never that much faster.
    "It's safer" >> yes it is, but not much safer (remember that URL faking exploit?) and most of it's "security" comes from active-x being turned off (which you can do in IE too). And remember: Open source = increased risk.
    "Tabs, extentions, and skins provide a better user experience" >> yes! I've got a few really nice extensions I just can't imagine living without (mmm egg timer). But it's important to note that IE7 will include these exact features too.

    Remember kids: if you think a poster is a troll because they disagree with you - you might be a troll.

    --
    Whoo, signature!
    DesireCampbell.com
    1. Re:Parent is not troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All but one of your points is valid. Open source = increased risk. The evidence for this doesn't exist. I could just as easily say that Closed source = increased risk. In both cases we can point to multitudes of exploits for both types of software and the end result is that the only real conclusion reached in certainty is that using software contains some amount of risk.

      Personally I'm disappointed by all of the ads. "This is Hot!" was the best over all in my opinion as it focused on the web browser specifically where the others tried to credit Firefox with a lot of things that just aren't accurate or are only a very small portion of the browsers benefits. Whee! on the other hand wasn't funny, and certainly wouldn't be recognized by non techie types. I showed it to my wife and her response was that it was horrible, annoying, and didn't make any sense. That's not exactly the impression I would want to give to my potential users.

    2. Re:Parent is not troll by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Dude, have you seen any commercials on TV lately? These Fx Flicks are pure gold in comparison to the endless mounds of pure shit that gets spewed constantly in every 20 minutes per hour of television. You overestimate what commercials (and ads in general) should do.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:Parent is not troll by evilneko · · Score: 1

      I'll criticize Firefox then :)

      It's no faster than Seamonkey
      It's annoying. Go to about:config to do things I can do in Seamonkey's prefs dialog? Please.
      Where the fuck is the new tab button? No, extensions can't place one on the tab bar, where it belongs
      Its users are annoying.

      Long live Seamonkey!

      --
      Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
    4. Re:Parent is not troll by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      Hehe :)

      But you can put in a 'new tab' button on the tab-bar with this extension.

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    5. Re:Parent is not troll by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      Oh, I didn't mean that open-source was MORE dangerous than closed-source, just that there is a risk because it is open-source - and I've seen a lot of FF-Fanboys saying it's safer because it's open-source.


      And for the record, I actually liked 'Whee!' when I first saw it last week. I remember specifically thinking - this is exactly the kind of commercial that would never get made, it's too insulting and lame.

      And then...


      I actually picture myself as IE (I would totally be that happy watching the comet go around me). I always imagined the other three kicking the shit out of "old man Fox".

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    6. Re:Parent is not troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Double click an empty area of the tabs bar to create a new tab.

    7. Re:Parent is not troll by blair1q · · Score: 1

      How totally intuitive.

      (not)

  34. marketing the browser internationally by mapkinase · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have afollowing concern about the name of the browser in regards to international marketing:

    In Chinese and Russian folklore, fox is an cunny evil treacherous animal. Given, tech community which does not care much about it already accepted firefox, but what about the general populace (target of the commercial number 5)? Does anybody care about folklore?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:marketing the browser internationally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      non-tech Russians are poor and do not have them internets.

      In Soviet Russia, the computer owns YOU.

    2. Re:marketing the browser internationally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anybody care about folklore?

      No.

    3. Re:marketing the browser internationally by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      This is not true anymore for Moscow and St.Petersburg, at least. The content of Russian internet is similar to the content of internet in Europe and in US: most of it is not related to tech stuff at all.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:marketing the browser internationally by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

      Well, I would hope that most people know that a firefox is a red panda and has absolutely nothing to do with foxes.

    5. Re:marketing the browser internationally by siufish · · Score: 0

      Well, in China, apparently not many. Sohu, a Chinese search engine publicly traded on NASDAQ with a market cap of US$1.02 billion, literally means "searching fox" in Chinese.

    6. Re:marketing the browser internationally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Chinese and Russian folklore, fox is an cunny evil treacherous animal.

      In pr0n writing, "cunny" means something else entirely. Do we want to alienate the pr0n readers?!?
  35. Statistics on Firefox popularity in Russia by mapkinase · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Statistics on Firefox popularity in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Site down. Summary: In Soviet Russia, Firefox surfs YOU.

    2. Re:Statistics on Firefox popularity in Russia by swiftstream · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't get it. Why are you giving us statistics from over a year ago?

      Recent Statistics (for the week ending Friday) show that usage is up to over 8%.

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    3. Re:Statistics on Firefox popularity in Russia by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      I found it indirectly via some forum when I was googling for the subj.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:Statistics on Firefox popularity in Russia by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1
      statistics of browser popularity in Russia

      No, it isn't.

      It is statistics of browser ID string popularity.

      If you do not understnd the difference, you have no chance of ever understanding the meaning of these stats and you may as well not look at them.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    5. Re:Statistics on Firefox popularity in Russia by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      "If you do not understnd the difference".

      If.

      Please provide benefit to the /. community by providing statistics on Firefox popularity in Russia from a better source.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    6. Re:Statistics on Firefox popularity in Russia by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 1

      Only a small percent of the webs users event know what a user agent string is. The false positives by the six visiting geeks pretending to be googlebot, lynx, IE, and YourMomIsGayBrowser aren't really going to fuck up statistics all that much.

      I'm sure they fall well within any reasonable margin of error.

      --
      They're there affecting their effect.
  36. This is hot! by firemaker103 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really think "This is hot!" was the best one. Professional, great ending, lits the features, the list goes on.

    Too bad Daredevil won. When I first viewed that, I had to watch it again and then even look at the comments to understand it.

  37. I have a better idea for a commercial by mongster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Side shot of man at computer.
    Switch to over the shoulder view showing a browser open to some stock website.
    Zoom in to search toolbar.
    Man types in "big breasts".
    Pause + text: "Fast searching"

    Zoom out to show new tab with search results.
    Man opens several websites in the background as tabs.
    Pause + text: "Tabbed browsing"

    Back to side shot of man.
    Voice of a woman offscreen: "Honey, I'm home."
    Man looks over at doorway.
    Close up of man quickly closing several tabs.
    Shot of man navigating to the "clear private data" option.
    Text: "Privacy"

    Shot of man giving woman a kiss on the cheek.
    Text: "Get Firefox"

    1. Re:I have a better idea for a commercial by thealsir · · Score: 1

      Text addendum: "It lets you have porn, and a life too!"

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
  38. Speaking of soap... by TimTipple · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Two nuns in a bath.
    One nun asks, "Where's the soap".
    The other replies, "Yes, it does doesn't it".

  39. I find it amusing that... by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I couldn't actually watch the videos in Firefox. I had to start up Safari to be able to see them!

    1. Re:I find it amusing that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked just fine on my up to date 10.4.6 with FF 1.5.0.2.

      Perhaps if you had clicked on the little triangular icon ...

  40. Working on the Flicks Site by asa · · Score: 2, Informative

    We're working on it. In the mean time, you can see many of the flicks here and the winners here:

    First Place - "Daredevil"
    Second Place - "Wheee!"
    Third Place - "Fox Fever"
    Honorable Mention - "This is Hot"
    Honorable Mention - "Give Me the Soap"

    - Asa

    1. Re:Working on the Flicks Site by omz · · Score: 1

      asa, why firefoxflicks.com blog does not accept comments any more ( i.e. "comments off" at http://www.firefoxflicks.com/backstage/ last posts ) ?

  41. Much Better This is Hot Link by NickCatal · · Score: 1

    Youtube has horrid video quality, in my opinion.

    Anyways for "This is Hot" the actual producer of the video is a Minneapolis-based video house called MAKE (they have done a ton of commercials you have probably seen if you are in the US.

    Anyways, their hosted version is of better quality than the ones of the FirefoxFlicks site. Check it Out (note: Will try to re size your browser)

    --
    -nick
  42. Too bad The Painter wasn't even in top 5 by wanted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just found it randomly browsing on Google Video for firefox flicks:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-224371650 1206353123

    It doesn't tell much about FF features, like "This is Hot" does (which is useful IMO). But OTOH the winning DareDavil is also rather focused on experience than screenshots and features. Similarily it has great editing and a nice music.

    As opposed to DareDevil I think it's easier to understand -- the surfing girl uses "like" almost every second word.

    1. Re:Too bad The Painter wasn't even in top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprisingly, I actually like that one... as opposed to the winning 5, of which only 'This Is Hot' was good.

      I didn't particularly like the voice-over... sounded rather amateurish. But other than that, it was great!

    2. Re:Too bad The Painter wasn't even in top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am very glad to see that people liked the painter... as the artist in this commercial i am obviously biased in my opinion
      kellyjanice

  43. Foxytees - like Flicks for t-shirts by matt5j · · Score: 1

    Seems the flicks idea is catching on, a group is doing it for t-shirts: http://foxytee.com/www.foxytee.com

  44. Missing plug-in? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Did you install the QuickTime plug-in into your Firefox browser?

    1. Re:Missing plug-in? by ckedge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the point though. Quicktime in ages past has been a horrific POS that siezes control of all your media preferences without asking you, and a TON of us refuse to ever use it again. Fuck quicktime.

      Youtube and Google Video *just work*, and there are a ton of open standards based formats or containers it could have been put in that would *just work*, but oooh no, we need this one specific proprietary plugin.

      Let me say this again. Fuck quicktime. And fuck them for choosing it.

      Look at all the immediate links too google video and youtube. Somebody's definitely not paying attention to their audience. Not playing by their own rules. (sounds just like a lot of the criticism of the contest itself...)

    2. Re:Missing plug-in? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Quicktime in ages past has been a horrific POS that siezes control of all your media preferences without asking you, and a TON of us refuse to ever use it again.

      But if you're using Safari, as kevingolding2001 claimed, then you're using a Macintosh computer running Mac OS X, and Apple installed QuickTime on your machine before you bought it.

      but oooh no, we need this one specific proprietary plugin.

      FLV, used by YouTube and Google Video, is just as proprietary as QuickTime.

  45. Aren't all ads dumb and lame? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    Judging from your comments, I don't think that you own this electronic box called a television. Yes sir, a television can be used to watch shows and movies and many ads on random products such as Preparation H and McDonalds.

    Let's analyse your analysis

    1. There's skateboarding but no surfing and you're confused? If you ask me, skateboarding is surfing on dry land. It just happens that some people took it to the extreme and make crazy moves with it but that ain't any different from surfers. Right, that and surfers don't look like emos.

    2. Agreed but, from all the things that you could of enjoyed, you liked the fish that appeared for a split second? It was neat I agree but the zoomout at the end of the firefox was nice too and it's safe to say I think that many people also liked the animation behind that.

    3. Payoff is lame? What about almost all those ads on TV out there where you see a random old man and women sit on a chair and then a picture of a doctor appears where he says "You too can live a life like this. Ask your doctor about Progrow today. With the new formula, anyone can benefit from it. Side effects may include diarrhea, sexual desire to fuck anything that walks and a bloody feces. Ask your doctor Today!

    Ok So here we have an ad of some announcer telling you to get information about a pill which you still don't have a damn clue what it is suppose to fight. Heck, I say we mind as well have a doctor on a green background tell us "Are you suffering from erectile difficulties? If yes, ask your doctor if Progrow is right for you" And end it there. We get it, it's not lame and it's direct but noo, lets have a picture of a green yard with an old men putting butter on his bread and make the listener guess what it's about

    Same thing here with Weeeeee, except the Firefox ad is more clear if you ask me. Firefox wasn't carried away and just sticks to his job.

    4. Dude, it's kids. It's suppose to be cute cause they're not sure how to solve the problem. It's like when you tell a kid that he has a dirty mouth cause he said cunt but the mouth isn't really dirty. Maybe it's something like this?

    5. Ultra-dumb? Well then what do you say about again, those tv ads where people look so frickin exicted on a product as simple and trivial as a pack of gum? Or how about Sunny D where all the kids rejoice and they're like YEAH!! or even better, the ad where a dumbass rolls his new jacket on a newly painted bench and then he's points his Mentos and then the guy's like MENTOS, THE FRESHMAKER! I challenge anyone to react like these guys after consuming candy.

    Where I'm getting at with all of this? There are a shitload of ads out there. That's all... Your analysis could apply to at least 50% of ads on TV today. Just change "Firefox" with "Viagra" and so on.

    1. Re:Aren't all ads dumb and lame? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      re 1. Repeating my point isn't disagreeing with me.

      re 2. Yes, I liked the fish. It had timing and wit. The animation at the end wasn't bad either, but could have had better timing. This stuff is subtle. There's a reason Pixar films are universally recognized as better than anyone else's animated stuff.

      re 3. Comparing something bad to other things that are bad doesn't make it good.

      re 4. Cute, yes. But it still has to have an internal logic. Even illogic has a logic with a discernible disconnect from correct logic. That's how suspension of disbelief works. You have to show the etiology of the error somewhere, or the kids don't look misguided, they just look stupid. They blame something "Dad" said, but nothing Dad said in any way can be taken or mistaken to mean "I'd put my computer in the washing machine myself if I had the time". Now, if the line had been, "Dad said he needed someone to scrub the viruses and spyware off his computer," you'd have comedy gold. That, and a closing shot of the computer bobbing in the sudsy, agitating wash-water. I'm cracking up just thinking of it...

      re 5. Again, comparing the ultra-dumb to the ultra-dumb isn't going to make it un-ultra-dumb. Compare it to the ultra-smart, and figure out where to fix it. Until then, don't insult your coworkers, associates, employees, partners, contributors, and shareholders by making ultra-dumb their public image.

  46. That weee one was terrible by SilentChris · · Score: 1

    And I don't mean terrible in a "ha ha make fun of Microsoft" way. I mean terrible period. :P Who thought that a highly irritating ad would be a good idea?

    1. Re:That weee one was terrible by wamatt · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Obnoxious can't even begin to describe it yet half the geeks here thinks its amazing.. sigh

  47. Ads are almost never accurate by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    "It's faster" >> well, sometimes. Sometimes it's slower. It's a crap-shoot really. And it's never that much faster.

    What about Intel Ads showing its superiority in the market. Are they really that faster than AMD in fields where AMD is the clear winner? Or how about ads where you see a guy running real fast because he's got new shoes.

    Ads are suppose to be clear about the product and IMHO they should give some accurate information but I don't see that happening in today's ads. The goal of ads today is to blindly sell products. McDonalds is healthy? Yeah, ok there Sherlock.

    1. Re:Ads are almost never accurate by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      Did I say that other comercials aren't terrible? NO. Did I say anything about other commercials? NO.

      Ads should be truthful, but usually aren't - that doesn't make these commercials any better. Just because others do it - doesn't mean more should.

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    2. Re:Ads are almost never accurate by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      If ads were thruthful half of the corporations would fold overnight.

      "Our product isn't terribly good and is kind of expensive. We didn't really test it and just copied one we bought at the corner of the street, but then we have bills to pay so please buy it. Thank you for your time."

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:Ads are almost never accurate by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      We can always hope :)

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
  48. Parent isn't Troll by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

    Seriously guys, it isn't trolling to critisize something. They all sucked - really.'This Is Hot' was the only one to actually explain what Firefox is.

    --
    Whoo, signature!
    DesireCampbell.com
  49. Sadly "The Painter" did not win.... by peterpressure · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sadly my friend over at media-garden did not win
    i still think his is the best...
    http://www.media-garden.org/commercial/painter.htm l
    the painting is for sale if anyone wants to buy it...
    -peter pressure

    1. Re:Sadly "The Painter" did not win.... by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      I've got to say, IMHO, The Painter was the most professional and most "ready for TV" ad in the entire lot (I watched all over them rated with 3 or better stars).

      It's a simple message (grandma doesn't understand "viruses," "security," "pop-ups," etc.), it's got great music. It "just works" for the non-technical masses.

      Of course, if you're marketing to the TechTV crowd, you need something a bit different and can use all the buzzwords.

      I thought the Xraalthraal and John was kinda funny too (could use a bit better acting).

    2. Re:Sadly "The Painter" did not win.... by CaptSnuffy · · Score: 1

      That's the best one i've seen, it's a shame it went unnoticed.

  50. Can't hear daredevil by DrIdiot · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that has problem hearing the girl in Daredevil? Hopefully they fix that for the actual ad or no one's going to know what the hell the ad was about

    1. Re:Can't hear daredevil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may very well be the only one :) Sounded fine here...

    2. Re:Can't hear daredevil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not the only one. The final audio mix blows. No normalizing or sweetening.

  51. I disagree completely. by Jessehk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I watched the first place winner, "Daredevil" and frankly, I was confused. Besides the small text at the end, there was no mention of Firefox at all. From the perspective of an average observer, I just didn't get it.

    I also disliked "Wee" (however it is spelt). It sunk down to demeaning other browsers rather then explaining and showcasing Firefox's abilities. The browser should rely on its merits, not the shortfalls of other browsers.

    I loved "This is Hot". The animation was well done, and professional. The features of firefox were briefly explained, and a nice shiny logo with lots of flash was displayed at the end. In my opinion, this is clearly the winner.

    1. Re:I disagree completely. by wamatt · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. If you look at the comments of the videos, clearly more people felt This Is Hot should be the winner.

      Something definitely went wrong with the judging.

  52. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moment the IE explosion came up, my Firefox crashed.

  53. What the heck? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    I've seen two comments with links to videos that didn't win, and they both beat the crap out of 3 of the winners.

    - Weeee! is just stupid.
    - Give me the soap is playing off of the typical "children are stupid" idea. I hate anyone that tries to use that idea in their commercial.
    - daredevil just didn't have anything to do with FireFox in the first place, it could have been advertising anything if it didn't have the FireFox logo at the end.
    I think any two or three people in their high school film class simply screwing around with the camera could have made a better video than these.

    Fox fever and this is hot were pretty well done though, congratulations to them.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    1. Re:What the heck? by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

      I disagree about the 'soap' thing. Children are smart within their frame of reference, but they often take things too literally. Some of the most exciting times of my adult life as a father was watching my son try and make sense of the world around him. Benji would always find a way to describe something, even if he didn't know what the word was. The stables were: "The place with all the horses", a theater was: "The house with no windows", etc. But every once in a while, he'd act on that information and do something completely unexpected.

      It's cute, and it works. Years ago there was a commercial where a kid spooned peanut butter into the VCR, my own son did the same thing with pudding once. It wasn't a malicious thing, he was exploring his world.

      Now if you want to know what MY pet peeve concerning commercials is, it's when men are made to look like complete doofuses next to their all-knowing, long suffering wives - cue the "Waaaa Waaahhh" sound effect. Not every man out there is a sports junkie or a car nut either.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  54. joke of a contest by erbbysam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This contest was more of a joke than the jokes in the SNL that's on right now... Here
    They got rid of there blog(Here) after a lot of the entrants posted "comments" questioning what happened to it. Read the comments on that page to see the problems but here's a sum up of what the general story is:
    Facts:
    -Before I say anything about the videos this is how the contest was to be done (Herel)1) Concept (30%); 2) Production Quality (30%); 3) Script/Screenplay (20%); 4) Use of Firefox Logo, Name, or Tagline (10%); 5) Jingle or Soundtrack (10%). The winners were all in the first 20% of the videos posted. Only around 30% of the ads have been posted.
    -The winner of the competition "Daredevil" was posted online Apr. 11th on the firefoxflicks.com website...the contest ended Apr. 14th. This ad incorporates ALMOST NONE of the guidelines set forth other than the fact that she actually uses a browser. (And it's a clear of the recent coca-cola and American express ads... that's more of a rumor though but you decide for yourself)
    -"Wheee!" was in complete denial of the FAQ that they posted (specifically Here) that said that other logos could not be used without permission and yet there goes IE, Netscape and Safari(not to mention the TOS on those logos on there websites(which can also includes modifying the logos in any way))
    -"Fox Fever" had no video production quality other than that is was trying to be cheesy which can be argued to have not fallen under the scoring system set forth by the rules.
    -"This is Hot" deserved to win more than an honorable mention. It fit the "rules" set forth perfectly and has a very high production quality that (in my opinion) can take on some super bowl commercials.
    -"Give Me the Soap" was cute and could fit the rules perfectly.
    -It starts to appear that the actual "winners" were not exactly following the rules and guidelines of the contest and the two honorable mentions fit it perfectly (which is probably why there were 2 "honorable mentions" because there wasn't any mention that there was going to be).

    Rumors:
    -I'll quote myself for the first "rumor":
    "the only concern I have about the judging is that the 5 winners were among the first 25% up... I'm not to good at stat but doesn't that mean the odds of that happening unintentionally (5 hits within 25%) 1 in 1024(4^5) (or one could even argue 20% (5^5: 1 in 3125))? If the first ones up were a "cross-section" as noted earlier doesn't that imply that they weren't the best of the best? ...sorry if that was a bit confusing
    "# Asa(one of the firefoxflicks staff Says:
    April 25th, 2006 at 8:16 am
    cleancut, I don't think it was purely our idea of "the 50 best ones". We posted what we thought was a good cross-section of ads, from humorous to serious and everything in between. We certainly tried to launch the site and build early momentum by highlighting a set of ads that we thought would be compelling and entertaining to a broad audience.
    - A
    " "
    -NONE of the judges ever said a word about the contest ANYWHERE. try googling one the famous "judges" names and firefoxflicks and the only page that will come up is that the list of them on firefoxflicks.com. This lead to ALOT of speculation that some of the videos (Wheeeeeeeee) were picked because of the instant popularity when they were put on the site and not by market viability (or the "rules"). Also all of the judges apparently viewed all 2.5 hours of commercials in LA over 5 days even though they are all working on movies in various parts of the world. But that's probably because the firefoxflicks team forced them to this deadline to be at the SF film fest which wasn't the original plan.
    -The firefoxflicks team will never be able to use some of the ads (Wheeee

  55. dapper drake by slack_prad · · Score: 0

    wouldn't it be nice if there is something like this for the next ubuntu build ?

    --
    Sent from my desktop computer
  56. SmellsTerrific by jroysdon · · Score: 1

    SmellsTerrific is rather funny as well.

    1. Re:SmellsTerrific by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      It certainly beats the others that I've seen (and I've looked at all the winners plus more). It's friendly to the non-technical, points you in the right direction, and relatively non-irritating. It's also the most professionally done of the ones that I've seen. Fox Fever was kind of amusing and covered more technical details though. It also, if you think about it, drives home the name of the browser a lot more than the others. Have to give it to Smells Terrific though.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  57. Uh, no -- Jason doesn't know if it true or not it by iamwoodyjones · · Score: 1

    Relook at that link it's been updated

    UPDATE directly from Jason: I know a lot of folks are coming here from DIGG and other memetrackers. The $72M someone told me at BarCampLA and I have no idea if that is true or not. If you reblog this (or report it) please make sure you make that clear.

    Even though CNN and other sites are saying 72, 73 Million they all link to Jason's blog and he admits that it's just a rumor....

  58. Crashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations, you made my Firefox crash. Haven't seen that for ages.

  59. Javascript? by Animaether · · Score: 1

    I guess I can't read the dialog to see what it says (not to mention that it's not a vanilla Windows environment, so most people won't even recognize it's IE right away), but can't a javascripted dialog pop up again and again and again ad nauseum in Firefox just as well? Be it with a timer event, or by means of an onLeave() cancelling the leave, etc. ?

    1. Re:Javascript? by theshibboleth · · Score: 1

      Is it even Windows at all? The desktop has at least been made to look like OS X, what with the window that collapses on itself and all, if it is not in fact OS X. (Also there's the rounded blue bar thingy...)

  60. This site sucks by jopet · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Another site that does not provide download links for the video files and assumes that everyone has the necessary plugin. No- there are people who cannot have the plugin (because of their OS) or do not want to install it and prefer to use seperate viewer programs to view videos. Therefore, there should be a download link for each video file.

    Sad to see that even this site does not follow that simple rule. Needless to say that there is no contact address on the site to reach those responsible for the blunder.

    In a word: they suck.

    1. Re:This site sucks by flood6 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they changed this since your post, or what, but there's a download link on each now. If there wasn't one there before, then I have to agree that it's piss poor design.

  61. Stop the Lies by Jessta · · Score: 1

    With all this large scale promoting of Firefox, some how people seem to forgot the facts and just start lying to make their points.

    Firefox is not lighter or faster than IE. This is a confusion created by the fact that is it is lighter than the Mozilla suite.

    Firefox still has security issues, the firefox people seem to be pretty good at patching rather quickly, but I still won't say that Firefox is 'safe'.

    The advertising of a 'pop-up blocker' is bizaar, it's not a feature, it's the removal of a feature.

    check it out: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyt hs.html

    Don't get me wrong, Firefox is still the best of the meger crap that is the web browser market, but that's no reason to lie to people.

    - Jesse McNelis

    --
    ...and that is all I have to say about that.
    http://jessta.id.au
    1. Re:Stop the Lies by dublin · · Score: 1

      Firefox is not lighter or faster than IE. This is a confusion created by the fact that is it is lighter than the Mozilla suite.

      Like hell it is. Firefox weighs in at very nearly the same as the entire Seamonkey (ex-Mozilla) suite. Try it yourself - fire up Firefox and Thunderbird, and check the resource utilization relative to Seamonkey with both browser and mail windows open - the FF/TB combo is nearly twice the size. Seamonkey delivers *much* more bang for the buck than Firefox/Tbird/Nvu/etc., which is why it's the high-performance choice where size and speed matter - Puppy Linux being just one of a number of good examples.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    2. Re:Stop the Lies by Jessta · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you.
      But firefox as a browser alone is lighter than the whole mozilla suite.
      Although that it only really so if you fail to notice to tick boxes in the mozilla suite installer that allow you to not install the mail client etc. as part of the suite.

      - Jesse McNelis

      --
      ...and that is all I have to say about that.
      http://jessta.id.au
  62. Re:Tabs by Vincman · · Score: 1

    "one of them showed FF's tabs, which amazes me because that is one of the easiest ways to get somebody to switch from IE."
    It won't be when IE7 comes out.

  63. How to crash Firefox by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    Ironically I managed to crash Firefox by downloading all those links in seperate tabs and then playing one while the others are still loading.

  64. It's easy to disable the popup blocker by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    The advertising of a 'pop-up blocker' is bizaar, it's not a feature, it's the removal of a feature.

    If you really want popups, turn the popup blocker off. It's not hidden away in some obscure setting in about:config, it's the first option in the Content settings tab!

    Edit->Preferences->Content->[ ] Block Popup Windows

    Also when it hides a popup you get a message telling you about it and an easy way to show it.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  65. Ok, now compare to TV by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Now compare these commercials to what's on TV. I find these more entertaining and even though maybe they'll get just about as annoying, they have a lot more thought than your average ad, certainly more than any that has to do with computer software. This is the best computer software ad out there, and is certainly going to fare well against other ads currently running on TV!

  66. TV spots? Web Ads? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Everyone here seems to be making their opinions known on their fav videos, but no one is discussing what these will be used for.

    Some of these ads have high production value and as good or are better ads that I have seen on TV. Are these any plans to try and get some of these spots on prime-time? Is any wealthy donor like IBM/Google/Shuttleworth/Cuban going to pony up the cash for this?

    Heck I could even see benefits to RedHat or Novell funding such an ad campaign. Anything that reduces IE's marketshare lowers the barrier to entry for other operating systems.

  67. You're way over the top here by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone even watch the ad?

    One the the first sentences she says is "I have always liked things fast"

    That's the whole point. Jesus, I thought this was slashdot?

    Oh, and to the GP - it's "dark" because it is *sunrise*. Just look at the sky. Sunrise is the best time to surf, any surfer knows this.

    1. Re:You're way over the top here by blair1q · · Score: 1

      So the sun rises over the ocean in California?

    2. Re:You're way over the top here by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Well if you were heading East really really fast?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:You're way over the top here by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Was there somewhere I missed that said she was in California?

    4. Re:You're way over the top here by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Please. You're kidding, right? You think anyone with that attitude and hobbies is anywhere else...

  68. Google Video is "Flash garbage" too. by ESqVIP · · Score: 1

    Google Video does not require you to download anything (except for possibly a Flash plugin, of course) to watch the videos. The Google Video Player is only needed in case you wish to download the video for offline view.

  69. They should show them all! by linebackn · · Score: 1

    My personal favorites were
    This is hot, Fox Fever, Infinite, and of course Wheee!

    But with only a couple of exceptions I thought they were all very good and I think they should all be shown on TV.

    Perhaps IFC could have a spot where they show all of the Firefox Flicks back to back? If TechTV were still alive (damn you evil comcast!) I know they would have gladly done something like that.

  70. Quicktime, eh...? by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They used quicktime video...?

    Well, I guess not many Linux people are going to be watching those movies.

    Come to think of it, neither will I. Not since quick time changed from being a crappy media player into a crappy media player with a big helping of invade-your-entire-machine-and-redirect-every-poss ible-file-association-with-no-escape-ware.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Quicktime, eh...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst.Rant.Ever.

    2. Re:Quicktime, eh...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorenson v3 and AAC can be decoded using 100% Free Software these days.

  71. Wee -- what sound goes with this logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get the point of ths one and would give it one star.

    After thinking about it, it seemed to be a child's association game:
    What sound do you think of when you see this picture? (logo)

    Given that, some possible outcomes:

    - Explorer icon: whee (I'm having fun, even as an idiot)
    - Netscape icon: nyaa nyaa (I'm playing keep-away, security)
    - Safari icon: phhhht (I think I'm better than you)
    - Firefox icon: (silence) (What sound goes here?)

        Since the Fox's backside faces viewer, sound could be:

    - Firefox icon: fart (I stink)

    - Firefox icon: wizz? (I need cleanup)

    - Firefox icon: Shut-up! (I'm your pissed-off parent in the front seat of the car.)

    All are negative associations for Firefox.

    Another sound association for the 'e' might be
        'eeek!'

    The whole tone is negative advertising, which turns off viewers from even thinking about the product. Parents are turned off from the beginning by the bratty kids, and kids are turned off at the end by the pissed-off parent. I'd switch the channel right away.

    Are we sure the votes haven't been rigged/flooded so far?

  72. My rating... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    5. Wheee!
    Worst. Promo. Ever. This is the most introvert commercial I've seen in ages. It will communicate to noone that's not already well aware. It doesn't present any useful information.
    4. Fox Fever
    Good, cheesy, but as a promo? I think it fails to communicate that this is a browser, not a security product.
    3. Give me the the soap
    More "family friendly" than Fox Fever, but again I feel it's being communicated as a security product.
    2. DareDevil
    Excellent "lifestyle" ad. I just don't think that is what Firefox needs.
    1. This is Hot
    Communicated that Firefox is a browser, with no pop-ups and faster. Not a spectacular delivery, but IMO well made and got the point across.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings