Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Responds To 360 Hackers

Microsoft would like to remind you that hacking your console most definitely voids your warranty. From the Eurogamer article: "Modified consoles, Microsoft added, 'will not be eligible for technical support, and the user's warranty will be voided ... the protection of intellectual property rights is a high priority for Microsoft and our partners, one that significantly and positively impacts economic growth, technological innovation, and most importantly, the confidence of customers who count on the integrity and quality of their products.'"

170 comments

  1. The Repsonse: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Haw haw!

    -Microsoft

  2. well, duh! by macdaddy357 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did some baboon actually call them for technical support after soldering in a mod chip and watching it go boom?

    --
    How ya like dat?
    1. Re:well, duh! by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      more then likely the awnser is yes.
      ,br> someone probably though "COOL! I can get free games now!" did it incorrectly and could no longer boot regular 360 games, called up Microsoft and asked about it went through the normal questions and found out he would have to send the console in, realizing this he (cause let's face it, only a guy would be THIS stupid) mentioned that he tried to fix it himself and ended up taking the thing apart to try and fix it, they knew right away what he did and let him know thus he freaked out.

      Personally, MS should of just put a recording for when people call "If you have opened your system for illegal modification we know who you are and where you live and we WILL be in contact with you", would make for some really funny moments.

    2. Re:well, duh! by Glonoinha · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know this probably wouldn't be happening right now, if it weren't for that damn Sony rootkit.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    3. Re:well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, the reason Draino has "Do not drink" on the label is because someone did. By definition, half of all people are below average intelligence.

    4. Re:well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By definition, half of all people are below average intelligence.

      Care to see which "half" you are?

      There is a room of 10 people taking an IQ test. It turns out that nine of them score an IQ of 95, and one person scores 145.
      (a) What is the average IQ in this sample of people? _____
      (b) What percentage of these people are below the average? _____

    5. Re:well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean median intelligence.

    6. Re:well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mean and the median (and the mode) are all "averages". Yes people, there is more than one meaning for the "average" of a set of numbers.

    7. Re:well, duh! by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Informative
      By definition, half of all people are below average intelligence.

      By definition, no. However, assuming a normal (Gaussian) distribution of intelligences, that's a reasonable approximately.

    8. Re:well, duh! by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 3, Funny
      Argh, s/approximately/approximation/

      I guess that's a hint at where I fall in the distribution...

    9. Re:well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be ridiculous. Allowing baboons to use their latest console would undermine customer expectations of a user-centric interactive experience.

    10. Re:well, duh! by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Half of all people are below average height.

      Being in a room with the Harlem Globetrotters doesn't affect this assertion.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    11. Re:well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sample size is too small.

    12. Re:well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you fall near the point where the first derivative of the curve starts again to grow. It must be very slippery there.

    13. Re:well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a)95
      b)0
      using truncated or interquartile mean. Perhaps you meant arithmetic mean when you said average. You really need to be more specific when posting on Slashdot.

  3. Xbox Live by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

    Does this mean they haven't been detected on Xbox live yet? Is there any news of this?

    Of course it won't be warrantied...if M$ is trying to scare them now, it's a bit too late as the warranty seal on the console has already been broken. Just a scare tactic for M$, a risk that's already been calculated for the modders.

    1. Re:Xbox Live by sdnoob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how long until there's an "xbox genuine advantage" program in place that requires a net connection every time you change discs?

    2. Re:Xbox Live by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      I would guess that Microsoft implements the same thing they did on the last XBOX, if a mod is detected that XBOX is no longer allowed on Live. Then you get alternatives to live and people have to decide if they want to use live or something else. There wouldn't be something that requires a check everytime you change a disc just everytime you connect to live, I would guess you would need to block the connection to live for a mod to work for the 360.

    3. Re:Xbox Live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a drive firmware hack, maybe the Xbox360 was made in such a way that the rest of the hardware has no direct access to the actual drive firmware, or any interface to check the checksum etc. and therefore CAN'T detect it.

    4. Re:Xbox Live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you put the emphasis on the CAN'T for any other reason than to be a complete asswipe?

    5. Re:Xbox Live by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      I don't see how you could call it a scare tactic. We all knew it already, and it's a simple statement. They're just reminding you of one of the risks when you do the whole risk/reward weighing in your head.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  4. Dear Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Understand that the last thing I need is your support.

    Signed,

    Anonymous

    1. Re:Dear Microsoft by AugstWest · · Score: 1

      This is totally true for Windows, but I've heard tons of stories of defective hardware. Hardware that I wouldn't want to fix myself, I'd want to hand it over to them, and say, "YOU built this piece of crap, YOU fix it."

      I wouldn't hack one until like the third generation units come out. Just like I won't run a Window OS until at least the second service pack.

      Besides, until there's an XBMC for it, it's not worth hacking,imho.

  5. Meaningless by Sean0michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know about other /.ers, but I've never had to call tech support for a game console, nor have I ever needed to use the warranty. As far as I can tell, voiding your warranty is only a nominal loss, nothing more. Most people who are thinking about modding their XBox won't care about the warranty--they know full well they are voiding it. They probably have the connections to fix whatever they break. I guarantee MS doesn't.

    --
    Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
    1. Re:Meaningless by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Eh, some PS2s have notoriously bad spindle motors. Usually they'll last until the warentee runs out though.

      Since the mod doesn't involve a soldering iron there's much less chance of permanently wrecking your console. Heck, I think one of the first steps is to take a backup of the firmware so you can fix it if something goes wrong.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Meaningless by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      As for the PS2, it has usually been the laser in my experience. I have 2 sitting here, with a 3rd untested (was given to me), and they both play CDs fine, just not most DVDs.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    3. Re:Meaningless by kahanamoku · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its not exactly technical support, but I DID actually call them for support on my Xbox360 in an effort to recover the copy of HexicHD that I deleted (as many others have) in an effort to reclaim some space on the HDD (expecting the game to take up the 7 gigs of space that was missing from the 20GB drive).

      After giving them my GamerTag, Email Addresses, Phone Numbers and Xbox360 Serial number they gave me a reference number for the call and I am to "expect a return call from them within the next week with the prepaid code" that I need to enter to enable to download from xbox live .... THAT WAS 5 WEEKS AGO!!!

      How can they claim they wont give you support if you void your warranty? it's no different than what they provide at the moment with a valid warranty.

      --
      ----- Concentrate on promoting more than demoting.
    4. Re:Meaningless by modecx · · Score: 1

      Actually, the motherboard in my SNES blew when it was brand new. Thankfully it was still a few days till the warranty ran out.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    5. Re:Meaningless by Osty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its not exactly technical support, but I DID actually call them for support on my Xbox360 in an effort to recover the copy of HexicHD that I deleted (as many others have) in an effort to reclaim some space on the HDD (expecting the game to take up the 7 gigs of space that was missing from the 20GB drive).

      Either you can't read, or you can't do math. :) When you go to delete anything from the hard drive, you can see exactly how much space it takes (in KB or MB, depending on the item). Even if you saw that Hexic is ~30MB and didn't realize that it was accurate, you're never going to get 20GB out of that hard drive. First off, 20GB == 18.6GiB (silly hard drive marketing using the SI definition of GB, while Microsoft displays "GiB" as "GB" on the dashboard). From that, subtract another 4GiB for game buffers (same deal as in the original Xbox, though they never told you the exact size there. Everything was in "blocks"), some amount of space for Xbox emulation, filesystem overhead, and the dashboard, OS, and related resources, and it makes perfect sense that you only get ~13-14GiB of usable space on a 20GB/18.6GiB drive.

      Oh, yeah, if you haven't heard back from support, call them again. They're people, too, and it's not unheard of for people to forget things once in a while. You just may be unlucky.

    6. Re:Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Microsoft actually has very, very good tech support for their consoles.

      About a year after purchasing my first Xbox (the first one), it broke down for some reason and simply would not start up. After calling their tech support, they let me know that my warranty was over (it had been over a year) and that she had "some bad news." The bad news was that they would be sending me a box for me to package the Xbox and send to them, for free to fix, for free. Afterwards, they sent the Xbox back to me weekend overnight (Saturday delivery)!

    7. Re:Meaningless by Johannes+K. · · Score: 1
      I don't know about other /.ers, but I've never had to call tech support for a game console, nor have I ever needed to use the warranty.

      This /.er has. My (original) XBox blew up my home cinema amplifier. Dunno what was wrong with it (voltage spike when turned on?) but after a while the input that the XBox was on would break. (Sound which was identical on both channels was amplified as it should be; sounds which were only on one channel were not amplified at all, so couldn't be heard.) The first time it happened immediately, on an input I'd never used before, so I thought the amplifier was at fault. It happened again with the new amplifier, though, and this time only after a turning the XBox on a number of times.

      So then I called M$ XBox Support. The friendly lady I talked with kindly informed my that since the manual only described how to connect the XBox to either a tv or a video, I was not covered by the warranty. I tried to remain civil, but probably didn't quite succeed (to put it mildly).

      I went home, read all the small print in the XBox manual (including a phrase about how you could expect the thing to work like machinery of this kind tends to work, or words to that effect), and decided to call back. This time I got a 'Hmm, I've never heard of that happening.', and got passed up the chain of command several times. Before I reached Bill Gates, some middle manager (or some such) decided that they'd send someone over to come and pick up my XBox, and have one of their engineers look at it. A month or so later, your generic UPS-replacement came by with a package from M$.

      This package contained an XBox, with a different serial number. Oh, and no save games on the harddrive. No letter of explanation, no phone call to explain, no mail, no nothing. From the serial number I guess they replaced the thing. What was wrong with it, I still don't know.

      So I suppose it all ended well. I still spit fire when I think of the initial response I got, though. I wish I'd thought of asking to speak with her boss. (Or should I secretly be happy that M$ has such people working for them, as this will undoubtedly cost them business in the long term?)

    8. Re:Meaningless by NATIK · · Score: 1

      Got exactly the same problem on mine, but once in a while a DVD will boot up and run fine untill I restart the console... It started doing this a few months after the warranty ran out.

    9. Re:Meaningless by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      I bought an X-Box, and it died completely while in warranty. Hard drive failed in an unrecoverable manner (you could hear the clicks across the room).

      I called tech support, spoke to some guy in the US (I'm in Australia) and after he thoroughly probed me he arranged a pre-paid box to be sent to me so I could have the unit repaired/replaced.

      Without the warranty I'd have been down a few hundred dollars. Outside the warranty period, I'd happily hack the X-Box, but inside that time I consider hacking it to be a bit more of a gamble than I'd like to take.

    10. Re:Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spotted the problem...

      you forgot to hand over the rights to your first born... ;^D

    11. Re:Meaningless by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1
      I had to get T.H.E. to replace my N64 controllers 3 times until i learnt to dismantle the joystick and fill it with vaseline to stop it wearing out after a month of use.

      That's the only time i needed a warranty on a console.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    12. Re:Meaningless by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      if this is a true story, why post AC?

      anyways, i trust that some people have had great interactions w/ tech support. each call is different. some people may get a really nice tech, some people may not. case in point, many people say that the xbox360 launch returns went well, because they got their console back within days. others complain because it took them weeks. MS is just like any other major company when you call for support: YMMV

    13. Re:Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you say that it ended well? The broken XBox blew two of your amplifiers? Did you get MS to pay for that, as well?

    14. Re:Meaningless by tzanger · · Score: 1

      I had to get T.H.E. to replace my N64 controllers 3 times until i learnt to dismantle the joystick and fill it with vaseline to stop it wearing out after a month of use.

      You filled your N64 joystick (I'm assuming the analog joystick, not the entire controller) with vaseline?

      you do realize that the analog joysticks on those things are optical, right?

    15. Re:Meaningless by masdog · · Score: 1

      After giving them my GamerTag, Email Addresses, Phone Numbers and Xbox360 Serial number they gave me a reference number for the call and I am to "expect a return call from them within the next week with the prepaid code" that I need to enter to enable to download from xbox live .... THAT WAS 5 WEEKS AGO!!!

      Sounds like a lot of jobs I have interviewed for.

    16. Re:Meaningless by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How long is the Xbox360's warranty anyway? Xbox's was only two months here in the US (I've heard it was longer just about everywhere else) and if you wanted a year you had to pay like $40 or some crap. I just waited my two months, cracked the case, and hacked my Xbox up, and now it's my media player (and I play SNES games on it now and then.) I've bought all of like seven games for it, and I only got one of 'em new.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Meaningless by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      Mine took about 2 years before it started crapping out.

      Have you tried messing with the "white gear"? There's a gear you can use to adjust the height of the laser. You just have to open the cover, open the top of the DVD drive, and you can see the gear. Mark it with a pen so you can always put it back where it was. This got a few more months out of it.

      Currently mine will play CDs fine, but DVDs give it problems; so I use HDloader to play games instead, copying them over on my PC.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    18. Re:Meaningless by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Agreed. With my luck, I always get the suicidal, bi-polar who's significant other just left with a relative.

      Yeah, I have bad luck.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    19. Re:Meaningless by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      just the chamber that the ball of the joystick sat in. i think it pulls on a rubber band or something to operate the sensors, but i cant remember now. the vaseline never escaped into the electronic bits, and those joysticks are still tight and functioning to this day.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    20. Re:Meaningless by NATIK · · Score: 1

      Tried a bunch of stuff, but that was some time ago, I do remember some white stick that the laser moved around on. I did get it to work for another week through tampering at one time, but it rapidly worsened again.

      If you have any information that could be helpfull or links I would appreciate it.

    21. Re:Meaningless by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      No, the stick is something else. This is definately a white gear.

      http://mattread.com/archives/2004/01/ps2-disc-read -error-fix/

      That is just the first google result I found. Scroll down a few pages.

      here's another

      http://www.tweak3d.net/articles/ps2repair/4.shtml

      If all this doesn't work, you can always buy a new laser assembly. They are about $40-55 depending on where you go.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    22. Re:Meaningless by NATIK · · Score: 1

      Thanks alot for those links, will try it out soon. I was considering buying a new PS 2 and then waiting for the PS 3 to drop alot in price, as there are some games I really want ot play on it, if this works even for a short while I will be happy :).

  6. what's new? by sk8dork · · Score: 1, Insightful

    so, pretty much nothing is different or new? same thing went with the original xbox, and i'm pretty sure the same thing goes for any piece of hardware. i'm sure this was also already in place before recent events. so microsoft is reminding everyone? ok.

    --
    ...all cock-blockery aside...
  7. This should be common sense and not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course. Would you expect anything different from anyone else?

  8. Significant positive impact? by TheSB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...the protection of intellectual property rights ... significantly and positively impacts technological innovation..." I'd love to see MS pay an 'independant 3rd party' to determine the truth on that.

  9. so wrong by foQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's look at the things which Microsoft claims are "significantly and positively impact[ed]" by trying to protect their Intellectual Property:

    economic growth
    The only economic growth impacted is the upward growth of the modchip makers -- an industry Microsoft can't dominate and bully. What happenned to the economic growh of Netscape when Microsoft integrated IE into Windows -- a design flaw that has not been corrected even in Vista! How about all of the patents illegally used by Microsoft over the years? Why was their "economic growh" and Intellectual Property not worth protecting?

    technological innovation
    The modchip industry is pretty damn innovative! You have a huge multi-billion dollar company in a huge multi-billion dollar industry designing these consoles to be hackproof, yet a few guys in a garage can hack them in under a year. That is technological innovation, too, it's just not in a way that Microsoft can stifle and control. It is open innovation, published and available to all.

    and most importantly, the confidence of customers who count on the integrity and quality of their products.
    Integrity like scratching discs to unpreadability? Quality like overheating and frequent crashes? Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it the modders and makers who designed ways to cool the power supplies and devices? From strings to hang the power brick to watercooling for the processors, the hardware hackers have been improving on the designs of the XBOX 360. It seems to me like these problems should have been fixed BEFORE shipping by highly paid designers, not AFTER shipping by fans who didn't want to feel cheated out of their money.

    1. Re:so wrong by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Hey to be fair when Internet Explorer was first rolled into windows it won because Netscape sucked at the time.

    2. Re:so wrong by cornface · · Score: 1

      Hey to be fair when Internet Explorer was first rolled into windows it won because Netscape sucked at the time.

      It's true. The foulness of Communicator is what destroyed Netscape. IE4 was leaps and bounds ahead in the key demographic of "people who don't like horrible browsers."

    3. Re:so wrong by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? I use Vista. IE is NOWHERE NEAR integrated.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:so wrong by Nos9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually I for one, do prefer not to have people cheating when I play them in online games...
          Halo 2 used to be fun, running into a guy who shoots you from his flying warthog (and yes I mean the damn thing flew through the air) through walls with automatic headshots is anything but fun, nor is playing capture the flag with a guy who can run across the map in 1 second, capturing your teams flag about the same time the system tells you it has been taken.

    5. Re:so wrong by Osty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The modchip industry is pretty damn innovative! You have a huge multi-billion dollar company in a huge multi-billion dollar industry designing these consoles to be hackproof, yet a few guys in a garage can hack them in under a year. That is technological innovation, too, it's just not in a way that Microsoft can stifle and control. It is open innovation, published and available to all.

      This is the classic dilemma of anybody doing anything security-related. If you're defending, you havet o protect the entire system against any possible hole, usually with limited man power (yes, even in the OSS world), and under a time constraint to get the software/hardware out (you may patch it later, but you need "good enough" from the start). If you're attacking, you just need one tiny little hole, and you have all the time in the world to do it. And, you're working with essentially infinite man power (while you're focusing on one hole, another attacker somewhere else is focusing on a different one). Innovation here lies in how long you can keep your system unhackable.

      Integrity like scratching discs to unpreadability?

      It's your own damned fault if you don't understand the physics of a spinning disk and try to reorient your Xbox 360 while a disk is playing. Maybe Microsoft shouldn't have made the Ring of Light adjust with the orientation of the console, as that would keep the sheeple from screwing up their games because they want to see the pretty lights. Not a design flaw (go try it with a PS2 -- you'll have the same problem. Nobody was ever stupid enough to do it with a PS2 because there is no Ring of Light on the front).

      Quality like overheating and frequent crashes?

      I can't help but think the overheating issues were way overstated by early adopters and the media. By all accounts, my own 360 is "launch window" (build date of early December, purchased mid-December), and I've yet to run into an overheating issues. Then again, I don't box my 360 up in an enclosed media center, with no airflow around the console or the power supply. You wouldn't put a PC in an enclosure with poor circulation, so why would you do that with an Xbox? There was a verified problem with a bad batch of power supplies, but you could get that replaced under warranty (but not if you modded!). Not to mention the many cases where crashes were attributed to overheating when the real culprit was a poorly-connected power supply (you have to push it in until it clicks and the little clip catches. Otherwise, you're not going to have a solid power connection and could easily crash the box because of it).

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it the modders and makers who designed ways to cool the power supplies and devices?

      You're both right and wrong. Modders did design ways to cool the 360, though none of them were particularly innovative (if you can't cool it better than Microsoft did in the same form factor, it's not an innovation). However, those modifications are unnecessary with a little common sense, and potentially a power supply swap.

      You want to talk about innovation? Okay. Go build a comparably-powered PC in the same form factor or smaller. I bet you can't do it. No, Mini-ITX.com doesn't count, because those PCs are nowhere near as powerful as a 360 (they make great media centers, though!). Even Sony can't do it. The PS3 is going to be huge. The 360 is no larger than a PS2. Don't believe me? I'll take a picture. I have my PS2 standing right next to my 360, and the 360 is approximately .5 inch taller due to the hard drive, and no wider. It's a little deeper by about 1.5 inches, but that's less than the old Xbox and much less than my cable box or my DVD player.

    6. Re:so wrong by NATIK · · Score: 1

      You can cheat protect without making people unable to use their own hardware, how do you think Valve protect against cheats in CS? Not by locking down the game or your system, but by looking for known cheats. It is just a bad excuse to keep the consoles locked down.

    7. Re:so wrong by NATIK · · Score: 1

      Integrity like scratching discs to unpreadability?

      It's your own damned fault if you don't understand the physics of a spinning disk and try to reorient your Xbox 360 while a disk is playing. Maybe Microsoft shouldn't have made the Ring of Light adjust with the orientation of the console, as that would keep the sheeple from screwing up their games because they want to see the pretty lights. Not a design flaw (go try it with a PS2 -- you'll have the same problem. Nobody was ever stupid enough to do it with a PS2 because there is no Ring of Light on the front).


      Call me stupid if you want but I have moved my PS 2 around alot while playing changing orientations a total of 360 degrees with a spinning disc and I would be willing to do it again always. The PS 2 dosnt have this problem, I dont have one scratch in any of the discs I have done this to. It is a design flaw not a normal thing.

    8. Re:so wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 360 is no larger than a PS2. Don't believe me?

      No, I don't believe you, and I think you're about to contradict yourself...

      I have my PS2 standing right next to my 360, and the 360 is approximately .5 inch taller due to the hard drive, and no wider. It's a little deeper by about 1.5 inches, but that's less than the old Xbox and much less than my cable box or my DVD player.

      So you mean to say that the 360 is

      • 0.5 inch taller and
      • 1.5 inch deeper
      than the PS2... and yet it's still no bigger?

      Sorry, I couldn't resist.

    9. Re:so wrong by Kattana · · Score: 1

      0.5inch taller and 1.5inch deeper? Sounds like you have just enough room to stuff the PSU inside. GG.

    10. Re:so wrong by devnull17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're probably right about most of that, but the 360 is substantially bigger and heavier than a PS2, and also requires an external power supply the size of a brick.

      Not that the 360 isn't an impressive piece of engineering, but it's much more comparable in size and mass to the original XBox.

    11. Re:so wrong by Jackmn · · Score: 1
      You can cheat protect without making people unable to use their own hardware, how do you think Valve protect against cheats in CS
      VAC is horribly inadequate. So is just about all anticheat software out there.
    12. Re:so wrong by NATIK · · Score: 1

      Mayby but I would much rather have more lacking cheat protection the totally shutdown hardware, I want to be able to use my hardware for whatever I want. Ofcaurse VAC cant get them all but it does get a good deal, the rest is really up to server admins to weed out, you can never get them all.

    13. Re:so wrong by wed128 · · Score: 1

      First, you are a minority in using an unreleased BETA operating system. Second, IE is integrated in every mainstream windows since Windows 95 SP1.

      Microsoft finally listened to people with Vista, thank god.

    14. Re:so wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what an intelligent business model! Sell the hardware at a discount without any protection so people can buy it, cost Microsoft money, then not buy anything more for the console! On top of that, the people paying all the pirated games - all 20 of them since everyone copying the hell out of them - destroy Xbox Live with their rampant cheating that can't be prevented.

      You should write the thing up, and pitch it to some venture capitalists. I'm sure they'll be happy to throw all that money at a sure failure!

      Stupid Slashdot fucktards expect everything to be designed specifically to do everything they want it to do...

    15. Re:so wrong by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What happenned to the economic growh of Netscape when Microsoft integrated IE into Windows

      Ok, I know it's off-topic, but the only one to blame for Netscape's problem is Netscape. The reason IE became more popular than Netscape is because, at the time, IE was *better* than Netscape. It had nothing to do with integration with the OS. Netscape crashed regularly, got rid of their stand-alone browser in favor of a behemoth that did everything poorly and nothing well, and then to completely finish themselves, didn't release a product for something like 3 solid years.

      (Want proof? Apple shipped both Netscape and IE on its OS disks for many years, and the vast majority of Mac users still chose IE over Netscape. You can't say Microsoft had any undue influence there, and IE still won out.)

    16. Re:so wrong by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, microsoft finally listened to people that refuse to use Windows b/c of the inherent security flaws. We've had, for years and YEARS, Linux users complaining of the security flaws inherent thru integration with the operating system. We bitched at them after they started to realize they were nowhere near secure with their crap webwork of modules and components that were necessary to work the operating system - and they FINALLY listened to us.*

      It's about time they took a 'password for every program' approach for installation/modification of HDD contents.

      * = I'm a mainstream Microsoft user, since I was 12 and had Windows for Workgroups 3.11. I'm not a fool when it comes to this older-than-dirt discussion.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    17. Re:so wrong by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      I'll take a picture. I have my PS2 standing right next to my 360, and the 360 is approximately .5 inch taller due to the hard drive, and no wider. It's a little deeper by about 1.5 inches, but that's less than the old Xbox and much less than my cable box or my DVD player.

      There is a large slot in the back of the PS2 which I believe is space for a harddisk or ethernet/network card.
      The PS2 is designed to be extremely tight and compact. In fact, it's so compact that modding the damn thing is a difficult excercise in soldering. Definitely, not for the faint of heart. Just take yours apart and see (it'll void your warranty but do you really care??) Modding the XBOX on the other hand is a simple case of sloting in a three progged jack. (no idea about the 360 though)

      Cheers,
      Ben

  10. AAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "...the protection of intellectual property rights...significantly and positively impacts economic growth, technological innovation, and most importantly, the confidence of customers who count on the integrity and quality of their products.'"

    +5 Funny

    (or, better yet, +5 The Exact Opposite Is True :-P )

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  11. free games vs mabey perhaps it might break by good2pets · · Score: 0

    all free games I can play versus mabey perhaps it might break at some point in the future. I dont condone piracy but the threat of not being able to call microsoft for help if it breaks is really dependent upon them actually being helpful in the first place. Remember they didnt want to recall the xbox powercables that were overheating and burning up people's houses, yeah that helpful. Yes I have called them, and yes its that bad, its like they were told at orientation not to answer the phone until the guy has been on hold for at least one hour. Not only are they all in India, but it seems only five of them. Ugh.

  12. Go MS by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft is being pretty good about this. They're just talking about the warrenty. Apple would be cursing the evil hacking pirate terrorists at this point.

    I can't wait until my XBox 360 gets repaired. The 3 red light circle started flashing the first time I plugged it into Xbox Live.

    1. Re:Go MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not a troll!!!!!

  13. Only voided warranties...? by JediLow · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "will not be eligible for technical support, and the user's warranty will be voided."

    Does that mean Microsoft is actually respecting the owner's right to own the console unlike they did with the Xbox? I'm fine with companies saying that its no longer covered by them if you tinker with it, but when they attempt to go beyond that line (ie: claiming DCMA violations, claiming the owner has no right to do what they want with their console) its gone way too far.

    1. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Osty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does that mean Microsoft is actually respecting the owner's right to own the console unlike they did with the Xbox? I'm fine with companies saying that its no longer covered by them if you tinker with it, but when they attempt to go beyond that line (ie: claiming DCMA violations, claiming the owner has no right to do what they want with their console) its gone way too far.

      Can you point to even one case where Microsoft prosecuted an individual for modding his Xbox? Sure, they and Sony went after Lik-Sang for selling mod chips, but not the people who use them. They've attacked sellers who sold modified Xboxes with 100s of pirated games, but that was because of the pirated games, not the modchip. They patched holes in games and the dashboard that allowed for soft-modding, but that's their perogative and your fault for buying a re-release of a game or signing in to Xbox Live (and if it was IE or Windows, you'd be bitching if they didn't patch the holes ...). They banned modified Xboxes from Xbox Live, but they have the right to choose who uses their service and who doesn't (and once you're banned, you no longer have to pay for it). Read the TOS you agreed to when signing up. Microsoft has never stopped anybody from installing a mod chip and running Linux.

      Expect all of the same to happen now, too. In fact, I'm surprised that their only response was to remind you that you void your warranty with this hack. The current hack is only useful for playing pirated games. You can't use it for homebrew software or to run Linux, so there's no legitimate justification to shield it. When (not if) a real hack or mod chip appears, expect to get banned from Xbox Live for using a modified console (which will be much worse this time around, since Live is so much more important to the core experience of Xbox 360). Expect Microsoft to continue to go after people selling consoles with pirated games. And expect them to stay out of your business if all you want to do is run Linux and stay the hell off of Live.

    2. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Vo0k · · Score: 1, Troll

      > Can you point to even one case where Microsoft prosecuted an individual for modding his Xbox?

      Yes, in their internal court. Sentence: Lifetime ban from the Live service.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, in their internal court. Sentence: Lifetime ban from the Live service.

      Nope. They ban the specific Xbox, perhaps the Live account, and maybe the credit card in extreme cases, but there's nothing stopping you from getting a non-modified Xbox, a new Live account, and using a different credit card if necessary. Anyway, getting banned from Live is nothing even close to legal prosecution.

    4. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      That's a severe misuse of the term "prosecuted". Any business is free to refuse service to a particular customer.

    5. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      One already paid for, without refund, too?

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    6. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they are saying your 90 day warrenty is void if you hack. Does that mean the rest of the agreement is also void? hmm would have to go and read the whole thing.

      Um big deal?

    7. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      I don't use Live (I play online via XBConnect), but you most likely have to agree to terms and conditions when you sign up for Live. And I'm sure that's one of those aformentioned terms and/or conditions.

      --
      Your ad here.
    8. Re:Only voided warranties...? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Would that be the Live service where you agree, as a precondition to joining, that you won't try to hook up with a modified Xbox?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    9. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      So I didn't say they did it illegally. They just punished whoever they found guilty within limits of their internal law (THE terms of service).
      Claiming they are good, sweet and tollerant because they didn't take you to court is just false.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    10. Re:Only voided warranties...? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Would that be the Microsoft where you don't get punished for using modded xbox?
      Court persecution is not the only possible form of repression.

      I can watch for you to cross a street in illegal place and smash you with my car crippling you for life. I did so legally because you crossed the street in illegal place, I didn't even have to brake. But oh, I'm so saint, I didn't sue you!

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    11. Re:Only voided warranties...? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you'll find that if you can prove that somebody purposefully didn't even try to avoid you, they're up for charges.

      But, yes, when you specifically say 'in exchange for allowing me to use your online service, I agree not to modify the physical hardware that I use,' and you then modify the physical hardware, you've got no beef when they discontinue the service on you.

      Don't blame the stove when you're told that it's hot, but you poke it anyway.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  14. Oh noes! by Araxen · · Score: 0

    It voids your warranty! And no Tech Support! Well no shit sherlock!

  15. MS Real Response by Psychotext · · Score: 1

    My guess is that we'll see MS issue an update over xbox live soon that stops this particular hack method working and no doubt they'll put the same update into the machines rolling off the production line. Oh, and don't forget that they can put updates into the games too...

    Of course, I might be wrong, but I really can't see them being too worried. If they decide to go this way then the likelyhood is (until new methods are found) that the only people this will work for are the owners with older versions of the console that weren't connected to xbox live or used to play new games.

    --
    People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
  16. Consumers have important IP rights too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So violating the intellectual property rights given to the consumer is considered protecting intellectual property rights? Buh, What?!?

  17. Microsoft hardly cares about piracy by Myria · · Score: 4, Informative

    The hack only allows piracy. As Microsoft said, the rest of the security system isn't broken at all.

    That's the sad part. It's very obvious that Microsoft cares much more about preventing Linux, Xbox Media Center and Game Shark much much much much more than they care about preventing piracy.

    The 360's security against unauthorized software undoubtedly cost millions of dollars to develop, and an unknown amount to manufacture. Meanwhile, the anti-piracy system of the 360 is almost identical to the Xbox's weak system. They barely changed anything, even though they knew it was already broken.

    By the way, the piracy hack for 360 was finished months ago. They probably spent the rest of that time designing their stuff to make it incredibly hard for Microsoft to detect it through Xbox Live.

    Expect Microsoft to very soon reflash the drive of anyone connecting to the Internet with a version with no back doors and that checks digital signatures of future flashes. And they'll do this instantly upon detecting a connected network cable without asking for your permission.

    Melissa

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
    1. Re:Microsoft hardly cares about piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What are you talking about? Of course Microsoft cares about piracy. They lose big $$$ on every console, their only hope of turning a profit is the money get from game licensing. If people are buying the games, Microsoft isn't getting their cut.

    2. Re:Microsoft hardly cares about piracy by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      > The hack only allows piracy. As Microsoft said, the rest of the security system isn't broken at all.

      Luckily the hack also allows use of good old-fashioned backup/working copies. Less "omg my disk got scratched fuck help".

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Microsoft hardly cares about piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the sad part. It's very obvious that Microsoft cares much more about preventing Linux, Xbox Media Center and Game Shark much much much much more than they care about preventing piracy.

      Or, to put it another way, the people hacking it probably cared more about playing pirate games than being able to run Apache on their XBox.

  18. Honestly I don't care by Psykechan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft's warranty for the original Xbox wasn't worth the digital paper it was printed on. I had to send mine back three times with a defective DVD drive before I finally gave up and stopped buying games for the damn thing. It would refuse to play any discs be it movies or games intermittantly. The braindead techs at Microsoft's Xbox repair center would run their diagnostic disc on it once and then send it back with the same defective drive.

    I only started using it again when I decided to mod it to run unsigned binaries like XBMC on it. An interesting side effect was that I was able to copy my until recently unusable games to the hard drive to actually get to play them without the system locking up with an "Unable to read disc" message all too often.

    I actually bought a few games after I modded the system due to the fact that I was now able to once again use the console for what it was intended to do.

    Honestly I'll wait for the hackers to perfect a similar method for the 360 before I'll pick one up. I have no interest in pirating games but I would like to ensure that I will be able to play games that I purchase without being frustrated again. /rant

    1. Re:Honestly I don't care by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I only started using it again when I decided to mod it to run unsigned binaries like XBMC on it. An interesting side effect was that I was able to copy my until recently unusable games to the hard drive to actually get to play them without the system locking up with an "Unable to read disc" message all too often.

      Of course, with a modified system you would no longer be able to play on Live. Whether that matters to you or not is a different issue.

      The problem with your DVD drive was unfortunately common, and I'm surprised you never got a real repair for it (or at least a refurbished console). That said, the "correct" fix is to replace your crappy DVD drive (probably a Thomson) with one of the better drives from Phillips, Samsung, or Hitachi. Like you, my original Xbox had a piece of crap Thomson, but I fixed it by replacing it with a Phillips and everything was better (the DVD drive doesn't factor in to the identity of the console like the hard drive and motherboard do, so it's not seen as a hack and bannable offense). The Phillips drive did eventually die from natural causes, at which point I replaced the drive again, this time with a Samsung. Since the second replacement was not needed until I could buy a complete used Xbox for the price of a DVD drive at llama.com, I just went down to the local Game Crazy and opened Xboxes until I found one with a drive I wanted. After swapping the drives, my old box with all of my non-transferable saves was back in business. No modchip necessary, though now I have a spare Xbox in which I could put an old flakey Thomson (because the Phillips was really dead, not just flakey) that might be worth modding some day.

    2. Re:Honestly I don't care by Malevolyn · · Score: 1
      Of course, with a modified system you would no longer be able to play on Live.
      That's why XBConnect and XLink Kai exist. Maybe some of us don't want to pay to play games we've already paid for.
      --
      Your ad here.
    3. Re:Honestly I don't care by Osty · · Score: 1

      That's why XBConnect and XLink Kai exist. Maybe some of us don't want to pay to play games we've already paid for.

      XBConnect and XLink Kai rely on games having "System Link" support, which is just local LAN play. Since the assumption with System Link is that it's local, few developers bother to optimize System Link for laggy network conditions (yes, even for broadband. Your average 4Mbps/384Kbps cable connection pales in comparison to a local 100mbps switched network). That means the gameplay experience you'll get over one of those services is nowhere near the quality of play you'll find on Xbox Live. As well, you don't have integrated services like voice chat in all games (depends on if the game you're playing did voice chat for System Link, or if you're using an external app on a PC), integrated friends list within the game itself, consistent matchmaking within the game, etc.

      Also, you're not paying to play games you've already paid for. You're paying for access to the network and services provided by Live. Besides, it's only $5/mo (less if you pay for a year at a time rather than monthly). That's 1/3rd the price of WoW, and it applies to all games on the console (with the exception of Phantasy Star Online or FFXI).

  19. Well at least... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Billy-boy didn't take out a full-page ad in a gaming mag that screamed:

    YOU ARE ALL THIEVES!

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  20. Even shorter :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Microsoft,

    Screw you!

    - Anon.

  21. *GASP!* by HunterZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh noes!!!!1111eleven You mean that if someone mods their XBox360, they won't get a free power cord when their power supply starts a fire?

    I really can't think of any other reason that anyone capable of modding a console would want out of Microsoft's tech support.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
  22. You're wrong. by LKM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think about it.

    1. Re:You're wrong. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      My assumption is that height is distributed on a gaussian bell curve.

      The average height of the sample in the room will not be.

      But that DOESN'T affect the population at large.

      So, saying it is not true for 145, 95, 95, 95, 95 is a straw man.

      Did I miss something ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:You're wrong. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Depends which average you want: mean* {add up and divide by sample size}, median {line everyone up in order and pick the one at the halfway point; halfway along X-axis of ogive} or mode {most frequently occurring value; point on ogive where gradient is steepest}. Half of any population by definition are below the median. The mean, which is what most people think of as "average", may be skewed by a few very large or very small values, particularly if the range is blind. The median is more stable, even in a blind range, as long as the rogue values are few in number.

      * OK, there are two means. What I just described is the arithmetical mean. There is also a geometrical mean, where you multiply all the values and then ** by (1 / sample size). If you find yourself needing to do that often, you probably should consider taking the log of your data.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:You're wrong. by hector_uk · · Score: 1

      Or you could of just said that the bell curve is likely skewed negatively due to radiation ect (look at IQ drops downwind of bomb test sites *COUGH*TEXAS*COUGH* and that although the mean is about equal to the median in a perfect world it's not going to happen and it's not like their is good radiation making people smarter and to be accurate 100% half of all people are stupider than the median intelligence. (no i'm not one of those anti radiation "omg my wi-fi routers going to give me cancer" nutjobs, my wariness is based on actual risk, not the scariness (note how i did not use the word "statistics" so none of you nit picking math nazi's can say "theirs lies, damn lies and statistics"

    4. Re:You're wrong. by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do people say "could of" when they mean "could have" ?

      When I start my own country, I'll make bad grammar and spelling capital offences.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:You're wrong. by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Really? Well, in my country, putting a space character in front of a question mark will be a capital offence.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:You're wrong. by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      They're below the median/mean/mode.

    7. Re:You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might as well make them capitol offenses while you're at it, so you can watch.

    8. Re:You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being a homo.... will that be your country's religion? hmmm?

    9. Re:You're wrong. by The-Bavis · · Score: 1

      We're definitely being adversly affected down here by all of the harmful emissions Oklahoma keeps sending our way.

      /End of required OK bashing by Texan.

    10. Re:You're wrong. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      That's the British way of saying it...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    11. Re:You're wrong. by Pope · · Score: 1

      No it isn't, there's NO tense that uses "of" for modification. You're just an idiot.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    12. Re:You're wrong. by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      I think they are saying "could've" not "could of". But of course it's a little different if someone actually types "could of"...

    13. Re:You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They hear "could've" (the contraction) and they think it's "could of". Like people who say "for all intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes".

    14. Re:You're wrong. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the important phrase is "just said that the bell curve is likely skewed .....". Said is a past participle so it should have the verb "to have" somewhere ahead of it. Like "You have just said that the bell curve is likely skewed .....". Only I didn't use the opportunity to say that. I could have said it. That makes sense. And since one can use an apostrophe to indicate letters omitted [side note: is "ap'phe" grammatically correct?] one can write "could've" for "could have". But a moment's thought ought to show what it's short for.

      I'm sure if I went over this topic with a fine-toothed comb, I could find more examples of blatant misuse of the Queen's English. One shouldn't look a gift horse-in-the-mouth.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    15. Re:You're wrong. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry, but you are the idiot for not seeing through a very clear joke...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    16. Re:You're wrong. by non0score · · Score: 1

      capital offence? you mean like this?

    17. Re:You're wrong. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the phrase is actually to all intents and purposes.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    18. Re:You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One shouldn't look a gift horse-in-the-mouth.

      I'm fine with that. What I won't do is look a gift-horse in the mouth.

    19. Re:You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people say "could of" when they mean "could have" ?

      Probably because they don't realize that "could've" is a contraction.

    20. Re:You're wrong. by LKM · · Score: 1
      My assumption is that height is distributed on a gaussian bell curve.

      It's probably not. I'd say the average height (say, of an american) is most likely below the median height. The reason is that there is a disproportionally large amount of small people (due to persons with a disability - I'm sorry if that's not the PC term, english isn't my first language).

      Median == average is very, very unlikely to happen in the real world, even if the curve is almost a bell curve.

    21. Re:You're wrong. by LKM · · Score: 1

      I think "average height" is quite well defined to mean (sum of heights)/(number of people). Since human height (or intelligence) is not distributed evenly or on a bell curve or anything like that (think of mentally or physically disabled people), the average height (or intelligence) is highly unlikely to be equal to the median height (or intelligence).

      Thus, it's not true that half of all people are taller or more intelligent than the average height or intelligence.

  23. So why by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    buy an XBox at all? Most games are available for PC as well, and one way to actually stop manufacturers from limiting the options for users is to avoid closed systems like closed game consoles.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  24. No, what they care about is... by Duds · · Score: 2, Informative

    Protecting the integrity of the online security. On Xbox live you can be certain the person whacking you constantly isn't doing it with the aid of a patch to increase speed or damage, you just suck.

    If that goes, Xbox live's one REALLY good reason to exist does too.

    1. Re:No, what they care about is... by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the security of the 360 just covers the XEX file. All the other files on the disk can be modified and never checked leaving a huge backdoor for game hackers / game moders. Whats left of the 360s security pretty much keeps people from just writeing custom software at this point. Shouldn't be too much longer before that too is cracked however. Though not likely it'll be as wide open as with the Xbox.

    2. Re:No, what they care about is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Could you post any more about this? It sounds like a very big security hole.

      I understand that the 360 is a "trusted computer" -- do "trusted platforms" in general really only check the signatures of directly executable code, regardless of the fact that parts of applications and games are controlled by data (in the form of interpreted language bytecodes)? If TCPA systems all have this security hole, then it will be trivial to work around the "security" and reclaim your own computer.

    3. Re:No, what they care about is... by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of an aiming proxy?

  25. Just because you asked. by fujiman · · Score: 1
    I'm buying a 360 because:

    1. I Can't afford a PC that will play a game like Gears of War. Both the PS3 (yes, the PS3) and 360 are an incredible value from a PC/hardware point of view. Remember the 6800 Ultras when they came out? Up to 800 dollars!

    2. Windows on a PC blows. I'm sick of it. That's why I have a Mac... but Windows is the only PC platform with gaming. Yeah, yeah, I know MS also makes the 360, but they've figured out what Apple has known all along -- you make an end-to-end product and you can improve the quality of the software that runs on it.

    3. The future of PC gaming is headed toward the Xbox Live model anyway, why not have the best implementation of that model? Steam and other delivery systems are just catching up to what Live has already accomplished.

    And yes, I can get by without a mouse and keyboard. I have been intelligently designed with hands, fingers, and opposable thumbs to accommodate all sorts of tasks. And the 360 controller is heaven.

    1. Re:Just because you asked. by jeffmeden · · Score: 1
      The future of PC gaming is headed toward the Xbox Live model anyway, why not have the best implementation of that model? Steam and other delivery systems are just catching up to what Live has already accomplished.

      Live? LIVE???#$%# Live is the reason I won't get sucked into the xbox360. Yes it's cheaper to buy, but having to pay monthly for the benefit of getting game updates and simple online functionality is reprehensible. Steam, last I checked, is f-r-e-e.

    2. Re:Just because you asked. by Saige · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can use Xbox Live at no cost for much of it's functionality (with the 360). You'll get game updates, be able to download content from marketplace (free and paid), and be able to view and get on the leaderboards for various games. Claiming you need to pay for such things is completely and totally incorrect.

      It's only a limited subset of features that require paying - and really, $50 is a bargain for what you get. Cheater free online play (try THAT on a PC), a voice communication system integrated in, etc. Really - if you can afford a high-speed internet connection, Xbox 360, and games, then the cost of Xbox Live is negligable.

      (Note, yes, there are a few games that have had issues with cheating, but that's been due to flaws in the game itself - not Xbox Live)

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    3. Re:Just because you asked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I suppose you only play counter-strike and HL2? How convenient for you. I don't want a different Steam-esque client on my machine for every game I play. Steam itself spyware enough for me.

  26. Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the protection of intellectual property rights is a high priority for Microsoft and our partners, one that significantly and positively impacts economic growth, technological innovation, and most importantly, the confidence of customers who count on the integrity and quality of their products.
    There's no such thing as 'intellectual property', it is a meaningless phrase that is used to illustrate a complete misunderstanding of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret law.
    s/intellectual property rights/our control over your computer/
    Much better.
  27. Warranty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be noted that the so called warranty period is only 90 days parts / labor...

    And BestBuy would exchange it under warranty through their PRP...
    Just have to hide the ripped warranty seal...

    Trust me ;)

    1. Re:Warranty? by trewornan · · Score: 1

      Even if the warranty is void that doesn't mean you've got no rights - if it's a faulty product they have to replace or refund anyway. Not that they wouldn't try not to of course.

  28. hardware lockdown bad by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    I don't see how Microsoft's {for that matter, any manufacturer's} hardware lockdown can be considered as anything other than anti-competitive behaviour. If a car manufacturer set out deliberately to frustrate attempts to fit extra lights, a better stereo, blind-spot mirrors, fluffy dice &c. not made by them, they would quite rightly be slapped down in the courts. In fact, there's a healthy competitive market in third-party car accessories. A firm of house builders could not legally prevent homeowners from laying new laminate flooring, installing extra power points or fitting new door handles not approved by them.

    Due to a little thing called "Exhaustion of Rights" {it goes all the way back to when some bloke signed a piece of paper at a place called Runnymeade}, when you buy an XBox360 using your own hard-earned, anything you do with it {with the possible exception of setting fire to it and throwing it through one of their windows} is none of Microsoft's business anymore.

    It was quite legal for Parker Brothers, Activision, Imagic et al to make game cartridges for the Atari 2600. What changed since then? Apart from people getting greedy .....

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:hardware lockdown bad by DeeDob · · Score: 1

      ^ Not true...

      If you buy a new car and replaces parts with third partys, most dealers will void your warranty.

      I fully support Microsoft in their war against hackers...
      - Prevent cheaters online.
      - Prevent illegal copying of games. The software designers have to be paid so they can bring me more games.

    2. Re:hardware lockdown bad by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      that is illegal unless the third party part is the cause of the failure. same with printer ink, they can't void your warrantee just for using third party ink, but if third party ink dries or spills all over inside you won't get warantee service from the manufacturer

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:hardware lockdown bad by jkmullins · · Score: 1
      The car manufacturers do this, at least with the stereo on a regular basis. A large number of GM vehicles are like this already. If you have a GM vehicle in which the warning chimes (key in ignition, headlights on, etc) come out of the car speakers instead a dedcated speaker in the dash, you're going to be spending a lot more money to replace the radio in it. The car accessories shop I used to work in sold the necessary modules for $100. That was in addition to the normal installation fee, and a $95 premium over the normal wiring kits. If you tried to hardwire it without the modules, you'd not only loose all door chime functions, but also On-Star (if it was present in the car), and possibly other things. I know at least some models sent airbag signals through the module.

      Point is, a manufacturer has absolutely no obligation to make something moddable. As long as they don't claim it is moddable in a particular way, they can make it as closed as they desire and there's nothing you can do about it.

  29. Wow! That's a Lot of Hackers! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    That was my first thought on seeing the headline. three hundred and sixty hackers, all being responded to by Microsoft. I wonder if they each got letters, or if Microsoft sent out three hundred and sixty lawyers.

  30. "warranty" by Eivind · · Score: 4, Informative
    Especially for consumers in countries with non-silly consumer-protection laws this is irrelevant.

    In Scandinawia for example, there is a (by law) 2 years of indemnifications from defects in materials or craftmanships on all items marketed to consumers. And even 5 years on items meant to last significantly longer than 2 years.

    Now, this doesn't cover normal wear and tear. Nor does it cover consumer misuse (like say dropping the console from 6 feet), but neither does Microsofts "warranty".

    If you do mod your console, this affects your rigths under law not at all. The only exception being, offcourse, if you break the console by doing the mod. That is, offcourse, not Microsofts fault.

    But if you say mod your console by soldering in a new BIOS, and then half a year later the DVD-drive breaks, MS will have to replace it at their cost, unless they can show that it's likely the DVD-drive broke because of the soldering-in of the new BIOS.

    Americans buy expensive "extended warranties" to get what people in other countries have by default. (not that it stops companies from trying to push "extended warranties" here too, it's just even more pointless here.

    1. Re:"warranty" by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Conversly, Microsoft does not have to maintain the modifications you made to the console during a warranty repair - you submit a modded console for repair of the DVD drive and the MS techs can remove the BIOS modification as well.

    2. Re:"warranty" by Eivind · · Score: 1
      No they can't. What would be the rationale for this ?

      If I buy a new house, then repaint the bedroom green, then half a year later it turns out that one of the windows in the bedroom has a leak, the original builder will have to replace the window. But I don't see what rationaly you'd have for claiming that the builder could then, if he so choose, also repaint your bedroom to the original color.

      Modifying things you own is ALLOWED. Not only that -- but it's perfectly common, and when it comes to anything besides electronics the very idea that it could ever be otherwise is pretty ridicolous.

      Can your car-dealer remove your custom paint-job when you come in with the car after 4 months complaining about a broken clutsch ? No ? If not, why do you think MS should be allowed to do the same when warranty-repairing an Xbox 360 ?

    3. Re:"warranty" by Pofy · · Score: 1

      >In Scandinawia for example, there is a (by law) 2 years of indemnifications
      >from defects in materials or craftmanships on all items marketed to
      >consumers.

      It was actually increased to 3 years recently.

    4. Re:"warranty" by DeeDob · · Score: 1

      Well you just said it...

      "Nor does it cover consumer misuse..."

      Opening the 360 to install something (i.e. a mod chip) is not something the 360 was designed for. You're not supposed to open the 360, hence it's a "misuse"

    5. Re:"warranty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can your car-dealer remove your custom paint-job when you come in with the car after 4 months complaining about a broken clutsch ? No ? If not, why do you think MS should be allowed to do the same when warranty-repairing an Xbox 360 ?

      Because your custom paint-job can't interfere with the proper working of the clutch. I doubt MS would complain if you replaced the 360 faceplate.

      If instead you'd pissed about with the clutch pedal mechanism then there's a risk you burned out the clutch because your modifications didn't let it close properly. Then they'd tell you where to go.

    6. Re:"warranty" by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Americans buy expensive "extended warranties" to get what people in other countries have by default. (not that it stops companies from trying to push "extended warranties" here too, it's just even more pointless here.

      I assume you're talking about places like Best Buy and other electronics retailers, since as an American that's really the only common situation i've run into as far as paying extra for a better warranty - maybe I just don't hang around with the right people, but I don't know anyone who actually pays for the things, and I certainly don't do it myself, even on non-electronics.

      Thinking of stuff i've bought lately -

      CPU - 3-year
      Motherboard - 3-year
      Video Card - 3-year
      RAM - lifetime
      HD - 5-year (yay Seagate)
      Gamecube - 1 year, but in my experience Nintendo products are damn near indestructible unless you're actively trying to kill them, so this doesn't matter quite as much.
      Console games - 3 months on the GC games, no clue on PS1 or 2. Since the post-SNES, non-cartridge days began, i've never had a bad game that wasn't immediately defective (or my own fault from scratching it) in over 6 years.
      Sandals - lifetime
      Kitten - 6-month health guarantee from the breeder...Obviously somewhat self-repairing though :)

      If I was buying a new car, a multi-thousand dollar TV, or whatnot, I might think about going for some extra coverage....But even then (for example), all the new cars i'm considering come with something like 3-6 years of full warranty and up to 10 years on the powertrain by default.

      I can't honestly think of a reason to have a blanket two-year warranty on everything I own...The stuff that isn't already covered is either stuff like food or other consumables, or things that aren't going to break unless you break them yourself and void any possible warranty anyway. Of course you have idiots who will do stuff like buying a $6 warranty on a $10 phone and so on, but don't lump us all along with them.

    7. Re:"warranty" by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      A standard warranty includes the option, at manufacturers descretion, to repair or replace the unit - are they expect to apply any modification of yours to the new unit if they choose to replace it? No. You are not supplying the unit to Microsoft in the state that it was warrantied, and its acceptable for Microsoft to resolve any differences that your unit has to the standard templated design because if they do not, they cannot guarantee the unit is fit for the purpose it was sold (not bought - theres a subtle difference between the two in many countries).

    8. Re:"warranty" by Eivind · · Score: 1
      If instead you'd pissed about with the clutch pedal mechanism then there's a risk you burned out the clutch because your modifications didn't let it close properly. Then they'd tell you where to go. Sure. But nobody expects MS (or anyone) will fix a product that you yourself broke, that's not the point.

      When MS says "installing a mod will void your warranty" this sounds, to me atleast, like they're saying they'll not undertake any warranty-repairs on a modded xbox. I'm just pointing out in Scandinavia they won't get away with this -- if they want to refuse warranty-repair *they* have to show that the problem is likely due to consumer misuse. I gave a practical example: If you solder in a new BIOS, and then half a year later the DVD-drive goes broken, they'd still have to replace the broken DVD-drive. (unless there was some good evidence that the broken DVD-drive was a direct result of your mod)

    9. Re:"warranty" by Eivind · · Score: 1
      A standard warranty includes the option, at manufacturers descretion, to repair or replace the unit.

      I'm explicitly saying that in many countries, the rigths you have by law are *more* extensive than those offered by volunty "warranties" from the manufacturer, which makes the "warranty" useless.

      For example, in Norway if a product breaks in its first year it's at the *consumers* discretion if you'll accept a repair, or demand a replacement. (There's an exception if replacement is unproportionally expensive, if the clock in your new car is broken, you won't get away with demanding that the dealer replace the entire car.)

      A "standard warranty" (i think you're in error when you assume such a beast exists -- the warranties I've seen differ hugely in conditions and coverage) is simply irrelevent aslong as the rigths you have by law eclipse those you have by law. I'm aware that in i.e. USA you have very few rigths under law, I'm just saying that's not universally true.

    10. Re:"warranty" by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Opening the 360 to install something (i.e. a mod chip) is not something the 360 was designed for. You're not supposed to open the 360, hence it's a "misuse"

      Correct. So damages that are a direct result of this would not be covered. If you made the motherboard broken during your attempt to solder on a new BIOS, you'd not be covered.

      Damages that are unrelated to this are however covered. So, if you *do* install a new BIOS, and half a year later the power-supply melts, MS will have to replace that at their cost. They can't come screaming that your mod has "voided" your guarantee. The only way they could get away with not replacing it would be showing evidence that the broken powersupply was likely a result of the mod. (unlikely, I'd say)

  31. If support people are "forgetting" by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    then there's a lot more wrong at MS than even slashdotters might normally predict.

    Hopefully the support people aren't tracking your call using yellow stickies on the cube wall to remind them "Call Joe, re: code" Usually there's something more sophisticated than that for tracking support. Either there's an automated system for handling this, or at the very least the ticket should be coming up as unresolved. Saying "hey, anyone might forget" is a little silly

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:If support people are "forgetting" by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Hopefully the support people aren't tracking your call using yellow stickies on the cube wall to remind them "Call Joe, re: code" Usually there's something more sophisticated than that for tracking support.

      Hey, are you knocking my tech support methods? I'm far more likely to call someone back if I have a yellow sticky note taped to my monitor than if I have to remember to check Remedy once in awhile for open tickets.

    2. Re:If support people are "forgetting" by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      At the company I work for, having open tickets stay untouched for over three days affects your performance review, as well as your bonus.

      That said, I WISH we had Remedy. We have Unicenter Service Desk (USD) and it's widely disrespected over here. It's nrealy impossible to perform a simple text search to locate a previous problem, so as to assist you with the problem at hand.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  32. Modding/Hacking may cost you more than warranty by DeeDob · · Score: 1

    As it has been suggested, Microsoft will probably lock the hacked 360s from Live. Well i got news for you: unlike the original XBOX, a 360 with no Live is a crippled 360, even with only the silver account that is free: - No download service for game patchs; - no Live marketplace (which will exclude Live Arcade games); - no original xbox backward game compatibility; - no achievements, - no leaderboards. So it's not only online gaming that get's cut down...

    1. Re:Modding/Hacking may cost you more than warranty by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      As it has been suggested, Microsoft will probably lock the hacked 360s from Live. Well i got news for you: unlike the original XBOX, a 360 with no Live is a crippled 360, even with only the silver account that is free: -

      No download service for game patchs Never had it for my Xbox, or PS2, or Dreamcast, or PS1. Never affected my enjoyment. Check (not to mention patches for XBox games are readilly available on the warez scene, same will happen for the 360).

      No Live marketplace (which will exclude Live Arcade games) Never used live under Xbox. Never affected my enjoyment. Check

      no original xbox backward game compatibility; Still have a fully functional XBox for XBox games. Check

      No achievements, - no leaderboards. Never used Live under Xbox. Never affected my enjoyment. Check

      So it's not only online gaming that get's cut down... Only 1 out of your 4 arguments didn't involve online gaming, so yeah, it's only online gaming that gets cut down.

      So I have news for you. An Xbox 360 without Live capability might be crippled for you, but you don't represent 100% of the market. I know a lot of people who wouldn't be the least bit affected by being locked out or not using the Live component, myself included.

      (Sidenote: I'm not encouraging piracy, but I do believe that once you own a product you should be able to do what you want with it if it causes no harm. I don't think me running XBMC on my XBox ever caused anyone any harm)

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
  33. Warranty was only 90 days anyway by techstar25 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to this page. The warranty is only 90 days on the 360, which means that if you bought it on or around the launch day, in November, your warranty expired 3 months ago.

    To be unbiased, the PS2 also had a 90 day warranty as well. The gamecube has a twelve month warranty.

  34. Warranty? by Scigirl451 · · Score: 1

    This a truly flaccid attempt at a warning. Microsoft should be ashamed. People who would actually worry about voiding their warranty are likely far too Joe Citizen to consider (or be capable of) hacking their system. People who would try to finagle their 360 and have the capacity to successfully accomplish the task are likely also smart enough to convince the guy on the other end of the phone that the problems with his system are the result of trying to make toast, blow dry the dog, charge their digital camera and play Halo all at the same time...

  35. Why would Microsoft care about Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The serious question is why would Microsoft care too much about Piracy on the XBox 360 (and no, I'm not talking about the conspiracy theory of easily pirated systems selling better). Microsoft has designed their system around XBox Live and they want all games to have online gameplay and episodal content. Microsoft has probably designed their Hardware so that XBox Live can detect most hacks very easily; this means that although you can steal the game you can not play it online or gain the extra content. For them, stealing the game is similar to stealing World of Warcraft.

  36. XBMC by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    If MS would just support the XBMC project instead of forcing people to use the MS one this wouldn't be a big deal to most people. I don't care about playing ripped games but I would love to have the XBMC running on a 360. It would do a much better job of upconversion and dvd playback.

  37. Two Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dual Firmware.

    A good Xbox 360 modchip will have an external switch. On one setting, it will only load the hacked pirate firmware capable of loading burned games. On the other setting, it will only load the original firmware, disconnecting any electrical connections to the hacked firmware.

    A careful user won't plug the Xbox 360 into the internet when using the hacked firmware, but will be detected as legitimate and able to use Xbox Live when using the original firmware.

  38. $5 a month is too much for what Live Offers? by fujiman · · Score: 1
    If you can afford to upgrade your PC to handle Valve's/Monolith's latest stuff, obviously price isn't a issue. Go forth and game on your Windows PC.

    Complaining about $5 a month is a little silly though, don't you think?

  39. Modified to play "pirate games"? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

    ...like this one? I thought they just made it so you could play copies of games.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  40. I used my warranty past 90 days. by plagioclase · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, I got a 360 on launch day, and was able to redeem my warranty last month when the whole thing up and died (3 red lights). It took about a week and a half, and they replaced my original console with a newer one. My guess is that the launch day 360's were a little more problematic than later versions, leading Microsoft to extend the original warranty.

    The call center was pretty noisy though.

    --
    Yeah, I have a webcomic...
  41. Cheaters, pirates, AND homebrew by tepples · · Score: 1

    I fully support Microsoft in their war against hackers... Prevent cheaters online [and] Prevent illegal copying of games.

    Then why can't I port my own programs to the 360? Some of my programs are non-games or turn-based games (so cheating is no problem), and they're Free (so copying is no problem).

  42. For the lazy... by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

    (95*9)+145 = 1000. Divide by 10 to get the average and you end up with

    a) 100 for the average IQ.
    b) 90% of the test-takers being below mean IQ.

    Now, this example does not refute the grandparent's point that most people are idiots,
    as it only requires a change from "Half of all people are below average intelligence."
    to "At least half of all people...", however, the sample could be skewed as follows:

    Nine scores of 110 and one score of ten, for an average of 100, with 90% of people having
    above average intelligence. This is called a nonrepresentative sample, and such anomalies
    disappear once the testing audience is large enough. So... just keep increasing the number of your
    lab rats until you get a bell curve and everything should work out okay.

    P.S. "Intelligence Tests" do not measure intelligence. Never have, never could, never will. On the other hand, they are fine measures of test-taking ability, and might be useful in bureacracies to gauge someone's ability to fill out paperwork. ;)

  43. ... and the user's warranty will be void ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sure wish my end users were covered by warranty. I'd return them back for a full refund.

  44. Not the rights, but the money entailed... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...i$ what $o much matter$ to Micro$oft. That and $naffling authority over your machine$.

    And it alway$ ha$.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing