Slashdot Mirror


Why Apple Backed out from India?

rmunaval writes "BusinessWeek reports an interesting article on why Apple might have backed out from India. The prime reason being, India has grown at a much more rapid rate than expected and is no longer the cheap destination for the companies. It grew at an astonishing rate of 9.3% last quarter."

394 comments

  1. Oh crap. . . by Who235 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have to pay them close to a living wage?

    That wasn't part of the deal.

    Forget it, we're out of here. . .

    1. Re:Oh crap. . . by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They were paid a living wage (or something close to it). The only difference is that a living wage in Cupertino, CA is WAY higher than one in Calcutta or Bangledesh. Heck, the living wage in Cupertio is WAY higher than one in Kansas City, MO or De Moins, IO.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Oh crap. . . by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I wouldn't be surprised if they were getting a living wage all along. Problem is that the living wage went up.

    3. Re:Oh crap. . . by stinerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not until the Indian workers train their Nigerian replacements.

    4. Re:Oh crap. . . by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heck, the living wage in Cupertio is WAY higher than one in Kansas City, MO or De Moins, IO.

      And it's probably higher than it is in Des Moines, IA, too... : p

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:Oh crap. . . by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Once they do, they get $20 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE WIDOW OF GEN. SESE MOBUTU!

      [this put in to defeat the lameness filter]
      [this put in to defeat the lameness filter]

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Oh crap. . . by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I remember right, the cost of living in India is still something like a tenth that of the USA. A meal that would be ten bucks here costs a buck there. Now admitably this is partially due to an average quality of life loss, but I've heard of a number of retirees on fixed incomes moving there because it costs half as much to live there as they're accustomed.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    7. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You wouldn't believe how much extra housing costs on Io once you figure in the extra rad shielding and periodic cleaning of the sulfur gutters. Volcano insurance isn't even obtainable at a reasonable price; everyone just does without.

      And don't even get me started on the commute.

    8. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Volcano insurance isn't even obtainable at a reasonable price; everyone just does without.

      George Bush doesn't care about Galilean moon people!

    9. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you mean DES MOINES, IA?

    10. Re:Oh crap. . . by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not until the Indian workers train their Nigerian replacements.

      The problem with this is that we're running out of areas that have decent education standards, easy access to raw supplies, and, perhaps most importantly, are stable yet have low wages/cost of living. India was fairly unusual in that they had decent universities/colleges(though not enough of them) churning out qualified graduates, a large labor pool, stability, and a cheap cost of living/wage range that encouraged importation of work.

      Areas like Nigeria haven't solved these problems yet, thus raising the costs of locating there, even if their labor is dirt cheap. When you have to import the machines, supplies, and labor to build the factory and trainers to teach them how to operate the equipment, costs rise. It'll be a while before they have enough people skilled enough to replace indian programmers.

      Not that I object to businesses building factories there, as providing jobs, income, and training are some of the best ways to improve the above. People with paying jobs generally don't have much free time available to go play rebel.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    11. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      De Moins, IO.

      I presume you meant Des Moines, IA.

    12. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [this put in to defeat the lameness filter]

      Didn't work.

    13. Re:Oh crap. . . by Lugae · · Score: 1

      Next thing we'll be hearing about all those potato farmers in De Moins, IO!

    14. Re:Oh crap. . . by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The cost of living and the wage are only one factor of the cost of an ousourced worker.

      You have to add the cost of duplicating power infrastructure because too many companies have moved in and the utility grid cannot cope. Current brownout+blackout rate is 20%+ during daytime and growing.

      You have to add the exorbitant communication costs which will only grow up due to basic supply and demand laws. The fiber under the Gulf is still the same, there is no new coming up and demand has grown several times a year. The Eastern route is not looking any better because there India competes with the growing demand from China and other countries. 256Kbit there will buy you several E1s in the UK or the US (at the same contention ratio).

      You have to add.. add.. add...

      At the end of the adding all the numbers a worker in India will come up to less then US or EU costs in terms of salary and considerably more as far as infrastructure is concerned. From there on the overall numbers depend on how the work is organised, but I am not surprised at a company pulling out from India. There are plenty of other places around the world with comparable salary rates and considerably better infrastructure.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    15. Re:Oh crap. . . by pstudent12 · · Score: 0

      Nigerians/Africans don't speak Indo-European languages and are not Indo-European people (unlike the Indians).

    16. Re:Oh crap. . . by chgros · · Score: 1

      Bangledesh
      Do you mean Bangalore?
      Bangladesh is a country.

    17. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the cost of living in India is still something like a tenth that of the USA. A meal that would be ten bucks here costs a buck there"

      Glad you cleared that up for us, I had terrable anxiety working out one tenth of ten bucks.

    18. Re:Oh crap. . . by psu_whammy · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute... now you're telling me Apple outsourced to Jupiter, too?!

    19. Re:Oh crap. . . by lelitsch · · Score: 3, Informative

      With rising affluence, what people consider a living wage also rises much faster than subsidence level wages. The wage for the average day laborer might only have gone up a bit, but what middle class workers such as programmers or engineers would like to earn is probably rising much faster. For them, a living wave now probably includes being able to buy a cell phone, maybe a scooter or car, a bigger apartment, a few nights on the town,... And these things are likely not that much cheaper than in the US or Europe because they cater to a relatively affluent group of people.
      Some of my Indian (in the US) coworkers joked that the rents for a/c apartments with working plumbing and other amenities in Mumbay were actually higher than what they paid in a mid-size college town in the US. Yes, you could rent a carboard shack for $5/month, but nobody who can afford not to would.

    20. Re:Oh crap. . . by jcidiotashram · · Score: 3, Informative

      i was in India this april, and took my family out for dinner, the day before i left for US to an upscale restaurant. for a group of 10 people, i paid around 900 Rupees, which came to $19, the same that i spent last night when i went out to eat here in US. It is not right that the quality of life in India is not as good as here. i.e., if you earn in US and spend it in India it is great. but if you earn in India, then that meal we had was a luxury. it is very complicated. the hype about these high paying software jobs is very rampant in India and everybody wants a share of the pie(and i don't blame them). but the problem is sometimes i worry whether Indians is also going the same direction as US. i.e., abandoning the manufacturing sector(which is very vital for a good industrial growth) and giving more importance to the service sector. just like Apple major companies have their high end solutions R&D labs in US, so in reality there is not much value added here. it is sometimes sad that the young engineers are flocking the software industry than the traditional industries. it is about time, we had a reality check

    21. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing they didn't ask you to spell it then.

    22. Re:Oh crap. . . by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Give Dubya and company a little more time and it'll be just as cheap to shift it all back to the U.S. as was to ship it to India in the first place.

    23. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, dont buy the service or software products then and it wont be that way.

      While you make the demand, they will try to supply it at the highest profitable way possible.

    24. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried like hell to find a place that served delicious $10 hamburgers when I was in India, and couldn't find one that served them at any price. I took that to mean that India hadn't quite gotten their standard of living up to that of the US. Too bad.

    25. Re:Oh crap. . . by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Since English is the official language of Nigeria it's reasonable to assume that some Nigerians may be English speakers. South Africans speak English and a number of countries adopted French.

      What does their not being Indo-European have to do with the price of fish?

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    26. Re:Oh crap. . . by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      India is a REAL free market (outside the social Castes, but they're not legal anymore, kinda like discrimination isn't legal in the US anynmore) and they are starting to catch up with the US standard.. the joys of schooling in the USA then going home to being dirt poor don't last long. The only reason China is still cheap is the govt controlled labor market over there. (Work or be shot! and forget about Unions, funny hun) There was a front page article in the Wall Street Journal last week about how housing prices in some big chineese cities (not Hong Kong!) are outstripping the pay of even the people with masters and Phd degrees! And the Local govts are complicit with developers to sell off the public housing driving the costs higher. In "communist" China!!! Doesn't sound very communist to me..

    27. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I am a scholar of religion and a major facet of my research includes India. Specifically in Mumbai, the cheapest of slum apartments are extremely MORE EXPENSIVE than those in New York City. India has the #1 most expensive real estate. Most of these people are making nothing near a living wage.

    28. Re:Oh crap. . . by epicee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And by having a US standard of living you mean the country has to have good burger joints?

    29. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you've mistaken "communist" for "socialist."

    30. Re:Oh crap. . . by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      The problem with this is that we're running out of areas that have decent education standards, easy access to raw supplies, and, perhaps most importantly, are stable yet have low wages/cost of living. India was fairly unusual in that they had decent universities/colleges(though not enough of them) churning out qualified graduates, a large labor pool, stability, and a cheap cost of living/wage range that encouraged importation of work.

      You forgot a big factor: English speakers. India has a large number of English-speaking tech workers. The country as a whole has around a billion people and 100 - 200 million of them speak English well. The total population of Nigeria about 130 million.

    31. Re:Oh crap. . . by blincoln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The cost of living and the wage are only one factor of the cost of an ousourced worker.

      This is a very important point.

      We have a lot of people in India doing contract stuff for us where I work. The price for the contractors is relatively low, but there is a *huge* infrastructure cost required to let them do the work. There's the data connection costs that you mention, but also things like VPN gear, terminal servers, MS CALs (our enterprise agreement only covers employees, not contractors), plus all of the staff work here to ensure that everything can be done reasonably securely.

      That's just the concrete costs. There are additional ones that are harder to measure. Things like the potential costs related to misuse of our data by people in a foreign country, or the costs of supporting applications that may have been written by a completely different team or outsourcing company.

      I have seen some good work come from the contractors, but IMO they don't provide any savings worth the effort of sending the work to another country. It seems mostly like another big corporation Monopoly money game where they make it look like saving money by transferring the cost to another division.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    32. Re:Oh crap. . . by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      Also, many Indians speak English...

    33. Re:Oh crap. . . by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
      "It'll be a while before they have enough people skilled enough to replace indian programmers."

      Surely you jest! I mean, look at this quality work I received from Nigeria just today (I've edited parts of it out, so that I can still cash in on my good fortune:

      DEAR SIR:

      We happily announce to you the draw of the UK NATIONAL LOTTERY, online Sweepstakes International program held on Saturday 17th of June, 2006 in LIVERPOOL UNITED-KINGDOM.

      Your e-mail address attached to ticket number: [edited out so I can still collect] with Serial number [edited] drew the lucky numbers: [edited] [--] Bonus Ball which subsequently won you the lottery in the 2nd category.

      You have therefore been approved to claim a total sum of US$2,500,000.00 (Two million,Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars) in cash credited to file [edited].This is from a total cash prize of $USD 25 Million dollars, shared amongst the first Ten (10) lucky winners in this category. All participants for the online version were selected randomly from World Wide Web sites through computer draw system andextracted from over 100,000 unions, associations, and corporate bodies that are listed online. This promotion takes place annually.

    34. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we need to clean up our act here at home before considering operations in other countries. American IT workers also need to take into consideration to be competitive, and they need to consider working for less. So instead of getting the usual $100/hour pay, they should consider asking for less, then companies might then reconsider hiring Americans.

      I'm sure after looking for a job for more then a year, I would gladly take any job paying me less at this stage.

    35. Re:Oh crap. . . by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Perhaps for sufficiently low values of English, English and French, respectively.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After living in India in 1999, I can say this... if you think for one minute you can travel over there to find work, you will have a Rude awakening. First off, you might find employment over there working for an American company who transfers you there. If you cannot get an American company to sponsor your tenure over there, and just travel there to work, you are in for a lot of bureaucracy, and the need for a lot of bribery to get you "in".

      This is my biggest beef with Indian government. There is a whole new meaning to the word "Corruption" when it comes to dealing with the necessary paperwork to legally work in India.

      I can assure you, the playing field is NOT level... Indians can come over here and work if they are lucky enough to get an H1B visa. But can Americans go over there and work? Hah!!! Not very easily... but you CAN of course pay some official to issue you a work visa to work over there, and more then likely the only jobs available are for teaching Indian programmers how to obtain jobs in the US.

      Then again, you always have to consider the conditions over there. I'm sure their infrastructure is improving, but be advised the climate is TROPICAL. Lots and lots of rain from July until mid Oct (depending on where you are). Even the act of eating over there takes careful thought and care on what you might eat.

      True - things are a lot less expensive, but prices are rising every day. Communication costs are super expensive (In 1999 - use of VIOP was illegal). I know I was able to get SpeakFreely to work, but only if I set it to port 80. Most other VIOP ports were blocked. Although I'm told the VIOP policy has changed, but be expecting to deal with huge tariffs if you setup a call center over there.

      The biggest problem is getting a work visa to obtain legit work over there. I see there is only one way to do that. Be working for a company with branch offices over there.

      In 1999, their internet infrastructure was very very poor. There was only ONE ISP... "vsnl", but I'm told a host of new privately operated ISP's exist now.

      I'm sure this has changed...

      While I was living there, I was deluged with Indian programmers asking me if I could "invite" them to work in US under the H1B Visa... even back then, I saw and noticed the trend and pulled out of any involvement relating to outsourcing. Some facts...

          * Outsourcing is really not as attractive as it seems
          * It takes a HUGE amount of capitol to setup a sweat shop over there
              (Lots and lots of kickbacks and bribes).
          * You spend enormous amount of money training your beloved indian programmers,
              but can you keep them? No - they will bail on you in about 6 months, and
              bug you to death to give them an opportunity to work in US. Back then, the
              H1B quota was 250,000 a year, but now, thankfully, that has been reduced
              to approx 90,000 a year.
          * Your communications costs in tariffs are enormous.

      In Mumbai, there are thousands of trade schools teaching C++. For Indian students
      this is free. For foreign students, price is prohibitive. Mumbia is full of billboards touting "Live and work in America - learn computer programming" advertising trade schools.

      Tradeschools have a pipeline into American recruiters. Graduates usually have to work in one of the many Indian sweatshops for some period, then promise an H1B visa and a job in the US.

      I'm sure that's changed now.

      j

    37. Re:Oh crap. . . by arivanov · · Score: 1
      Absolutely agree. I would also add to that a few typical items:
      • Add the costs of replicating every development and test platform in at least two instances - one on site and one for the contractors themselves.
      • Add to that the costs of extra security for each of those.
      • Add to that the costs of extra on-call allowance for support staff which deals with systems that govern data replication between the sites. India is 4-5 hours ahead of most of EU and 10h ahead of the US. Alternatively extra hardware has to be thrown at this.
      • Add to that the costs of extra collaboration software to compensate for the fact that you cannot just talk to the person at the watercooler.
      • Add to that the costs of various moderately illegal (according to the Indian regulators) VOIP backdoors to bypass their telco and get a working voice.
      • Add to that the costs of extra elements in revision control systems to deal with multisite issues.
      • Add to that costs of creating data sets that comply with data export/data protection laws. In some cases this means paying for extra software to create these.
      • Add... Add... Add...
      Overall, especially as the costs of doing work there grow the overall balance of outsourcing work to there will become less and less feasible. If the current tendencies continue, withing the next 2-3 years the costs will become so high that companies will go back to importing people instead of exporting work. This of course will happen if the entire thing is governed by economic realities which I am suspicious that it is not. As you have noted it does smack of an overgrown Monopoly game.
      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    38. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it worked. His post full o' lameness got past the filter, didn't it?

    39. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you sir, this was fucking brilliant!

    40. Re:Oh crap. . . by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      "People with paying jobs generally don't have much free time available to go play rebel." Interesting if you apply that to western countries. Noticed how both partners work now?

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    41. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1:10 cost of living might be right, but it is an average. We must consider that no one of the lower class(es) have access to proper schooling. The IT professionals that are getting out of universities are used to a higher standard since they where kids (the same can be said in most of Europe and North America; Many of my IT friends would not accept a job under double the national wage average.)

      And now, 10-15 years after the outsourcing started they got used to their higher way of living, asking for more; Cost of living then increases accordingly. Add that you are expected to help family members at least for lodging and food, your "super wage" is getting stretched; and a little more every year.

      In another 3 to 5 years and it will be nearly over. So it is already too late to develop long term relationships. The team you start building today already cost you a lot more than 5 years ago, and to finish building a stable competent team of 500 workers in the next 2-3 years is not a simple $$$ decision like it used to be.

    42. Re:Oh crap. . . by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      I give up. How many rupees?

    43. Re:Oh crap. . . by Peyomp · · Score: 0

      I don't know what to say, except that you are incorrect. Net access is cheap in India. So is infrastructure, even if you do have to buy a generator. Its all so cheap, that total cost of employment is about 1/3 of what it is in the US, for instance.

    44. Re:Oh crap. . . by thebigo195 · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Cupertino for over 15 years and in that time house prices have almost doubled, along with many other living costs. Anyone looking for a home under $1 million or an apartment under $500k needs to live forty minutes away. I wonder how many homes you can buy in Bombay for that kind of money...

    45. Re:Oh crap. . . by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      The cost of living and the wage are only one factor of the cost of an ousourced worker.

      Agreed. There are substantial costs involved in outsourcing work to another country that, even if wages are 1/10th that of native workers, it's still a headscratcher and much work by accountants to decide if it's worth it.

      You have to add the cost of duplicating power infrastructure because too many companies have moved in and the utility grid cannot cope. Current brownout+blackout rate is 20%+ during daytime and growing.

      A very real reason to not locate to India right now. However, they probably weren't figuring on this 10 years ago when outsourcing was really big though, weren't they? Miscalculations happen.

      At the end of the adding all the numbers a worker in India will come up to less then US or EU costs in terms of salary and considerably more as far as infrastructure is concerned. From there on the overall numbers depend on how the work is organised, but I am not surprised at a company pulling out from India. There are plenty of other places around the world with comparable salary rates and considerably better infrastructure.

      Would you care to name some? I mean, you always have China, but we have some issues with them. Again, it all ends up as a comparison of numbers between options.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    46. Re:Oh crap. . . by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Overall, especially as the costs of doing work there grow the overall balance of outsourcing work to there will become less and less feasible. If the current tendencies continue, withing the next 2-3 years the costs will become so high that companies will go back to importing people instead of exporting work. This of course will happen if the entire thing is governed by economic realities which I am suspicious that it is not. As you have noted it does smack of an overgrown Monopoly

      It's already happened in several cases. Of course, another option is to outsource, but keep the work a little closer to home, and simply 'outsource' to an area like the midwest where costs are quite a bit lower. Sure, stuff is still more expensive, but you do eliminate many hassles/expenses inherent in trying to send work halfway around the world. One-two hours time difference compared to 10-12, English is the default language, no hassle with customs, etc...

      It's all up to the bean counters and how/what they count in their calculations.

      I'm not too worried, as long as they don't do something stupid like raise the minimum wage again. If to many jobs get exported, it'll depress wages here and raise them over there and it won't make sense to export jobs there anymore since we have the advantage of not having 'shipping costs'.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    47. Re:Oh crap. . . by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      You forgot a big factor: English speakers. India has a large number of English-speaking tech workers. The country as a whole has around a billion people and 100 - 200 million of them speak English well. The total population of Nigeria about 130 million.

      Good points, though you could probably replace 'Nigeria' with 'Most of Africa'.

      Depending upon what they're doing, you might not need to have the average employee speak english, like in manufacturing jobs, but for things like programming and tech support it certainly helps.

      For a shoe joint I'd think that you'd be more worried about how stabil the power and reginal government is. Rebels tend to be bad for business.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    48. Re:Oh crap. . . by arivanov · · Score: 1
      Would you care to name some? I mean, you always have China, but we have some issues with them. Again, it all ends up as a comparison of numbers between options.

      Europe between the ex-iron curtain and CIS border. Chech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Poland, Bulgaria, parts of Romania (not all of it). If you are brave enough to deal with Russian business the bigger Russian cities are also not bad infrastructurally. Definitely better then India. You get to chose from the whole spectrum of salaries and infrastructure costs and balance them according to the task at hand.

      There is a caveat though. All of these countries have fairly strict labour code and benefits packages which an American will have a fit about. I have seen it myself. A representative of a well known US bank screaming: "What da ya mean, that ya give 6 months payed maternity leave? It is the cow's fault. She should go on state aid". This has not prevented people exporting work to there though. Just ask Cisco where was their SS7 stack written or Canada where did they get their election software from.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    49. Re:Oh crap. . . by pjay_dml · · Score: 1

      Maybe "human dignifying wages" would be more appropriate. "Living" is just too ambiguous. There are those (no name calling) that believe, everything more than the necessary calories is to be regarded as luxury, while others view a mobile phone as essential to "being able to live" in todays world (with which I agree, ever tried getting a job without having a mobile phone or a car?).

      Who cares of "subsidence level wages", I rather not work than at that level. Why? Simple, because there is more to life than just eating and sleeping. And just adding sex to it, wont do. Besides, in western countries you don't die of hunger (but you might freeze or get beaten to death, if you live on the streets - depending where you are stuck), so why would I [should I] enslave myself to some boss, only to be able to pay for my food and rent a crappy place? And you will still be frowned upon socialy, so no real gain in social acceptance to gain either, but a high price to pay. I rather have my freedom, than knowing I paid for my way.

      Unfortunatly this is a subject not [often-there are instances of course] discussed publicly, as in the public opinion sphere there is only one mantra tollerated without being denounced a sleezebag or lazzy c...t: "Go to work! Do your duty!" The entrenched ideas of "housework!=work", should highlight the intrinsic control element in the underlying philosophy.

      Going down that track means questioning the status quo/uncovering the truth of modern day slavery! But it's a lot of work undoing centuries of brainwashing...not to mention the "Communist" accusations that will instantly be flung around...

    50. Re:Oh crap. . . by iTristan · · Score: 1

      Of course in many major (otherwise healthy) real estate markets, home values tend to double is as little as 8 years. It's not that unusual.

    51. Re:Oh crap. . . by ap7 · · Score: 1


      It isn't infrastructure. It was simply a matter of cost v/s benefit. The new centre simply wasn't large enough to make a major savings. Infrastructure is a problem but only slightly. Most large companies have huge gensets to take care of power blackouts. Power shortages in most cities in India will be eliminated within the next 2-4 years with the number of power plants being invested in. Around 20,000 megawatts within the next two years are expected to come onto the grid.

      Costs in India are still extremely low. While salaries are on the rise, rest of the infrastructure is still dirt cheap. Land is almost free thanks to state governments. Building on the land is also dirt cheap. Different states are falling over each other in providing incentives to IT companies to set up shop. There are tax incentives, assured supplies of power, etc. You have to understand that infrastructure is a problem - only for other industries. IT is getting the cream of it all.

      What caused Apple to move out? The amount of work they were going to do in Bangalore wasn't worth it.

    52. Re:Oh crap. . . by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      have seen it myself. A representative of a well known US bank screaming: "What da ya mean, that ya give 6 months payed maternity leave? It is the cow's fault. She should go on state aid".

      Ouch. That is wrong on so many levels to me. First he was incredibly insulting by calling her a 'cow'. But it points out that, indeed, defined benefits such as mandatory maternity leave increases the costs of operating there. I think it's even worse to call it 'maternity' leave, since that implies that it only increases the costs of hiring females. I don't care about how many anti-discrimination laws you have, that's a very real and calculatable reason to avoid hiring women, and it'll result in discrimination against them. Now, if you give the benefit to the dad as well, it can mostly even it out.

      Finally, I'm generally against all of this. I'm very libertarian, I'll admit, I wish that government would get it's nose out of requiring benefits for businesses, and said businesses concentrated more on paying money rather than having half the employee costs being 'benefits'. Then the individual pays for all their requirements. I'm especially fond of the 'healthcare savings accounts' and high deductable insurance plans. My dad's work has found that it saves money for both people who don't have much healthcare needs and those who do have substantial needs. Think about how many copays it'd take to bust $2000 in a year for someone with cancer? At $20 per visit, per test, etc... It doesn't take long.

      Then again, given the average birth rates in european countries, mandatory maternity leave might be a good idea to encourage some of them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    53. Re:Oh crap. . . by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      I had a healthcare spending account... I'm pulling out of it.

      While it's a great idea, most implementations are horrible, as bad as fighting with insurence, almost. I'd spend half an hour setting up a small claim, and the an hour fighting with them a week later because they didn't want to pay it. A month later I *might* get my cash back.

      I've decided to skip the account and just save my own money. I wasn't saving any more in taxes than I was losing in time spent arguing with the company.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
    54. Re:Oh crap. . . by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the delay, was traveling.

      I had a healthcare spending account... I'm pulling out of it.
      Don't you mean a healthcare savings account?

      There's actually two types of HSA's. The old style, where the money has to be used that year, and goes back to the company if you don't use it (the suck), of which the only benefit is indeed the fact that it's pretax money. I'm talking about the new style, which is a 'Healthcare Savings AccountPlan', coupled with a 'High deductable insurance program'.

      My Dad has it. He contributes $2000 a year to the plan, and the deductable on his insurance is $2000 annually(limit by law), after which it pays 100%. The premiums for this are less than a standard program, and there are no copays. If he doesn't use the full $2000 that year, it can sit there forever gaining interest for use later.

      One of Dad's coworkers went with the plan and he ended up with cancer. He burned through his annual $2000 contribution almost instantly, but the insurance then proceeded to pay 100%. Under the conventional plan, he would of had over 200 $20 copays, making the HDIP far cheaper for him. His account doesn't grow this year(it was his first year), but he likes it anyways.

      The system works best for those with light or heavy healthcare needs. If you need 'moderate' care of around $2000 a year, it might not be the best option.

      I'd spend half an hour setting up a small claim, and the an hour fighting with them a week later because they didn't want to pay it. A month later I *might* get my cash back.

      I'd try getting a different company. My dad has a debit card that pulls from the HSA, it's only valid at medical institutions, but pharmacies like Walgreens are now coding medical items can also be put on it. Dad can use it to buy bandaids and it goes towards the deductable/coverage.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    55. Re:Oh crap. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting... that does sound different.

      I don't think it's something that my workplace offers, though, and I'm a bit leery of going out and searching for it myself, but now that I know how it works, I'll at least keep an eye open. Thanks :)

  2. Markets work yet again by nelsonal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny, back when there was so much lather over outsourcing everything but the CEO to India, a few folk mentioned that this might happen and were replied to that with 2 billion people it won't happen in our lifetimes. Hope you are all doing ok!

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    1. Re:Markets work yet again by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I can't claim to have predicted that this would happen so soon, I will say that I saw it coming.

      Part of what happened that made this happen sooner is that the Indian quality of life, bolstered by all sorts of outside companies outsourcing there and pouring money and jobs into their economy, rose. This of course becomes a positive cycle, where the newly wealthy* start demanding more**.

      This sucks up potential labor far faster than simply looking at the unemployment/agricultural worker numbers.

      We're seeing the results now. India's currency is gaining strength, the dollar is loosing strength. Soon it'll no longer be as economical to outsource to asian countries(China will take longer). Soon it'll make more sense to outsource from expensive american cities to inexpensive smaller cities, larger towns, or downright rural locations within the United States. Arkansas costs half as much to live in than Hawaii.

      *relativly of course. They might still be 'poor' by 1st world standards, but they're no longer 'dirt poor'
      ** Services like telephones, internet, more frequent hair cuts, eating out, things like bigger, better constructed homes, vehicles, etc...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:Markets work yet again by tbone1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Soon it'll make more sense to outsource from expensive american cities to inexpensive smaller cities, larger towns, or downright rural locations within the United States. Arkansas costs half as much to live in than Hawaii.


      It's happening now. I live in Indianapolis, and there are already three companies here who are getting on that trend. One thing they point out is that prices for land and housing are 1/2 to 1/3 of what they are in, say, Chicago, and that while wages here aren't THAT much lower, they are lower. The labor laws are also pretty much the same as elsewhere in the US, plus there are nice little junkets like Colts games, the Indy 500, etc. Indy isn't the only place seeing this, either.

      Of course, over time, as wages adjust, ... but hey, that's just how the world is.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    3. Re:Markets work yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      the dollar is loosing strength

      LOSING DAMMIT not LOOSING

    4. Re:Markets work yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question: Will a lot more companies follow in Apple's footsteps and pull out of India? If yes, what will happen to the Indian economy?

    5. Re:Markets work yet again by Afrosheen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's interesting to note here is that the Indian government played a big role in the quality of life expansion.

        Take a look at Mexico in contrast. 2 years ago, illegal immigrants sent around 12 billion dollars back home. This was more than twice the highest foreign investment in Mexico. Last year, they sent back an estimated 17 billion. This was the second highest income for the entire country of Mexico; mexican oil brought in the highest income, but not much higher.* Yet Mexico remains dirt poor, despite the huge influx of cash they're receiving from El Norte and their illegal migrant workers. Ultimately, Mexico's government is to blame for the consistent failure to raise standards of living.

        It really makes you wonder just how much damage corruption does to a floundering Third World nation. It also makes the point that throwing money at a problem won't even begin to solve it most of the time.

        *Paraphrasing Dilip Ratha, World Bank senior economist

    6. Re:Markets work yet again by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      wish I could mod you up for that. Why can't someone who possibly has the skills to write decent code or plan a decent cluster setup of some sort rely on something other than spell check and get a 5th grade book on grammar?

    7. Re:Markets work yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon it'll no longer be as economical to outsource to asian countries(China will take longer). Soon it'll make more sense to outsource from expensive american cities to inexpensive smaller cities, larger towns, or downright rural locations within the United States. Arkansas costs half as much to live in than Hawaii.

      It's already happening - it's called rural outsourcing. It can make a lot more sense than outsourcing to India since you don't have the timezone, cultural and turnover (30%+ a year in India) problems to contend with, and it's much easier to find people with real programming experience.

    8. Re:Markets work yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      India was colonized by England. They brought English to India. Most Americans speak English. This helps India. India also has a good education system, for those that can afford it. Most can't, but there are one billion+ people in India. If 10% of the population of India gets a formal education they already have more educated people than the ENTIRE population of Mexico. So, 100 million English speaking college graduates gives them a bit of an advantage over Mexico. On top of this, Mexico suffers from corruption, no doubt, and the bigger problem of a culture that puts very little emphasis on education. Both corruption and the mentality that education is not important are cultural issues.. not gov't inflicted..

      So ya, money won't solve the problem of poverty in Mexico. Gov't "shake ups" won't either. Things won't change until Mexicans stop paying bribes and realize that their kids need to be capable of doing something useful in order to make a decent salary. People get paid big bucks to do things that produce even bigger bucks. If your child drops out at age 16, can barely read or write and has no other skill set, how are they ever going to make it big?

    9. Re:Markets work yet again by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

      It's loosing its strength against the feeble--oh, never mind. What were you saying again?

    10. Re:Markets work yet again by Firehed · · Score: 1

      That or we just find the next cheap country and repeat the cycle. What's not to love - we get cheap labor (and cheaper stuff and worse tech support as a result) and raise the standards of living for some third-world country. We're now capitalists and humanitarians!

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    11. Re:Markets work yet again by bigpat · · Score: 1

      One thing they point out is that prices for land and housing are 1/2 to 1/3 of what they are in, say, Chicago, and that while wages here aren't THAT much lower, they are lower.

      And when housing prices in and near the big cities go back down at least relatively speaking, then you will likely see a reversal of that trend.

    12. Re:Markets work yet again by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      That's why you get a #.1 version...after they run it through the spell check.

      --
      What?
    13. Re:Markets work yet again by chromatic · · Score: 1

      I bet that $17 billion is untaxed. That makes it difficult for the government to invest in useful goods and services to promote further economic growth.

    14. Re:Markets work yet again by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I know of one company here that moved its shipping and production from the Phoenix area partly because of the run-up in housing prices. They relocated to some podunk cowtown in Iowa.

      Of course, they also relocated 'cause FedEx saud they would give them better service if they moved to the Midwest. Come to find out, FedEx meant Memphis. Darn.

      But the employees the moved (way most of them) love it. And being the employer of 2500+ in a town with a population of 5000 makes you very welcome. Except for the Wal-Mart you brought along...

      Suppose Bangalore has any Wal-Marts?

      rick

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    15. Re:Markets work yet again by Courageous · · Score: 1

      It really makes you wonder just how much damage corruption does to a floundering Third World nation.

      No doubt this is a factor. But where you really want to look is the legal fabric supporting the stable ownership and free trade of land and real property. If Mexico opened up Baja to foreign ownership, in fashion that convinced the community that such rights were real and unrepudiable, Baja would turn into one long affluent retirement community, all the way from Cabo San Lucas all the way to San Diego...

      C//

    16. Re:Markets work yet again by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      A good post indeed, it's a shame that you're AC and nobody will ever read it.

    17. Re:Markets work yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Part of what happened that made this happen sooner is that the Indian quality of life, bolstered by all sorts of outside companies outsourcing there and pouring money and jobs into their economy, rose.


      Careful with generalizations... I'm not sure every person in India is enjoying this increased quality of life. I have to guess, but my guess is that it is only the tiny minority of highly educated people who are benefitting. The majority is still left to live in the same poverty they were in 10 or 20 years ago.

    18. Re:Markets work yet again by bacchu_anjan · · Score: 1

      Bangalore is getting increasingly expensive. That's why there are 20+ cities in India trying to fill in
      and offer competetive services. Apple apparently chose another country(kudos!) but there will be other cities in
      India which will offer fairly competetive services by next 3 years.

          So far, 1 City in India , Bangalore has been doing over 40% of the offshoring business but, in the
      next 10 years, if India has to remain competetive, this should come down to 10%. Which means other
      20 odd cities need to expand to accomodate 3,00,000 software Engineers and tech support personnel
      -- this isn't a tall order given the 10 year period. If they(the other cities) can do this in the next 5 years, then
      all the better.

          Google's CEO Eric Schmidt said(http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-schmidt 12jun12,1,3657570,full.story?coll=la-headlines-bus iness&ctrack=1&cset=true)
      "Our customers are one click away from moving to a different search engine". Although it is NOT as easy to switch your partner, it will get increasingly easy to replace certain services in the Web 2.0 era.

      BR,
      ~A(Anjan Bacchu)

    19. Re:Markets work yet again by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      And when housing prices in and near the big cities go back down at least relatively speaking, then you will likely see a reversal of that trend.

      Um, chances are that will NOT happen. Housing prices may flatten or even dip for a short while, but the historical trend of seriously rising home values will continue. A great example is even during the dot-bomb crash, the whole Bay Area still experienced massive housing price inflation. The problem is that housing has become a scarce resource. Buildable vacant land in Chicago is *gone* and has been gone for years so in order to handle population growth, distant suburbs sprawl. The problem is mirrored all over the country in every single large city. Any large vibrant community or community within commute distance to a vibrant community has significant housing price inflation.

    20. Re:Markets work yet again by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      ...And that would help Mexico HOW?! A one-time capital investment that quickly prices locals out of the market?!

    21. Re:Markets work yet again by bigpat · · Score: 1

      Um, chances are that will NOT happen. Housing prices may flatten or even dip for a short while, but the historical trend of seriously rising home values will continue.

      Funny thing about historical trends... historically they suck as predictors.

      Housing prices can't outgrow incomes any more than they already have. People are stretched farther than they can go already, so to expect buyers to continue to be able to afford increases in housing costs that outpace incomes is not realistic except perhaps in some limited markets. Yes supply is somewhat constrained... except that most cities have a ways to go in terms of increasing density, but demand can only grow as incomes, wealth and population grow. And currently population growth is only being propped up by immigration. And immigration is following the economic growth, which is being propped up by foreign investments.

      So heres how it is going to go... as soon as inflows of foreign capital start to dry up, we will see a decrease in economic activity, a decrease in immigration, and a decrease in the buying power of the dollar. All of which will cause a relative decrease in the cost of housing. At least relative to overall inflation, which may increase as the value of the dollar depreciates further. Like has been said we are lucky in that all our debt, personal and public, are denominated in our own currency. So unlike South American economies of the past, our economic fallout will likely be much more contained and most people of working age will derive a relative benefit because wealth will be destroyed, again, in relative terms. So with cost inflation, workers will put pressure on wages to increase, thus relatively speaking housing costs will again rise at a rate which is near inflation or indeed, as you suggest, drop for a time.

      I am not preaching doom and gloom. There will be winners and losers, but the economy will continue, because that is life.

    22. Re:Markets work yet again by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "Soon it'll make more sense to outsource from expensive american cities to inexpensive smaller cities, larger towns, or downright rural locations within the United States. "

      Already happening. Microsoft and Yahoo are installing data centers in Quincy, Washington. I think Yahoo also is putting one in Wenatchee.

    23. Re:Markets work yet again by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      It really makes you wonder just how much damage corruption does to a floundering Third World nation. It also makes the point that throwing money at a problem won't even begin to solve it most of the time.

      I'd believe it. It's been my belief for years that aid is generally ineffective in these countries because of it. So much is stolen or wasted that nothing happens.

      It's reached the point that I'd rather start invest all the aid for these countries in a fund for invading the worst of the lot every so often. It'd end up being more economical and effective. Sure, it's more expensive in the short term(IE 20 years), but it can pay off big.

      Let's see, which country is the worst off right now, but is still reachable by sea or through an allied country...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    24. Re:Markets work yet again by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I bet that $17 billion is untaxed. That makes it difficult for the government to invest in useful goods and services to promote further economic growth.

      I'm willing to bet that it ends up being spent in a store at some point, then you have sales tax on it, income taxes for the workers at the store, taxes on the factory that made it or tariffs if it was imported. Plenty of spots to collect some taxes on it.

      As was said, it's more a cultural problem leaking into government actions than the other way around. Now yes, the government can initiate a campaign against corruption and bribe taking and such, but they're so corrupt that getting a non corrupt person in there who's willing to endure the threats and such to push for ending corruption is unlikely.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    25. Re:Markets work yet again by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      That or we just find the next cheap country and repeat the cycle.

      See China. :)

      I agree with you, except to note that we're not likely to export jobs to any region that's not stable, which many 'third world countries' aren't. Some regions of the Middleast might be ready soon, but there's serious terrorist concerns to worry about. Africa is just, on average, a real mess.

      Lack of stability tends to increase costs, for example, having to bribe a half dozen local warlords and hire a heavily armed security force is expensive.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    26. Re:Markets work yet again by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      ...And that would help Mexico HOW?! A one-time capital investment that quickly prices locals out of the market?!

      Those retirees do tend to demand quite a few services, ranging from maid service to major medical. Then when they die, their estate sells their property to new old people who bring more fresh money to the region.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    27. Re:Markets work yet again by Courageous · · Score: 1

      The only consistent predictor of genuinely positive economic outcomes on a nation state level, world wide, and without exception, is the stable basis of land and real property rights, and the ability to engage free trade of same. A socialist country that actually has this fabric will outperform any otherwise "free" economy that does not, regardless of economic system, or even regardless of the political system. Generally speaking.

      But to answer your question more deeply, one must understand that money is not something that evaporates as it goes from point A to point B. The retiree who spends the money, gives it to the builder, who in turn spends trades it with another, each stage along the way negotiated by merit in exchange for some sort of productivity of each party. Said money then tends to spin in circles, moving from party to party, further encouraging mutual productivity.

      It would, to put it bluntly, help Mexico more than any single thing that Mexico can possibly do. There is no better economic possibility for them, no gift from god directly that is likely to help Mexico more than this one simple thing.

      You do know that this is the reality in the U.S., where foreigners routinely buy and trade property without barrier, enjoying one of the most reliable and liberal free markets for land and real property, anywhere here on this Planet Earth?

      I encourage you to look into this more deeply.

      Happy thinking.

      C//

    28. Re:Markets work yet again by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      A Mexican Florida, I can see that!

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  3. India to start losing jobs. by gasmonso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now India will feel the pain as jobs are outsourced to Asia and Eastern Europe where rates are cheaper! Pretty soon, people in Zimbabwe will be coding :)

    http://psychicfreaks.com/
    1. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Pretty soon, people in Zimbabwe will be coding :)
      You write that as if it's a joke. Sub-Saharan Africa is a big emerging supplier of tech labor, in the position that India was 20 years ago. We're already seeing major efforts in Nigeria, don't think for a minute that much of the rest of Africa won't follow.

      What are the major requirements for locations to which you want to outsource tech jobs?

      - A stable power grid (if it's not there, build a small one yourself)
      - An oversupply of labor with high population growth (to keep that oversupply rolling)
      - A sufficient percentage of English-speaking workers.

      The rest is training and, for large companies, will pay off quickly. I'm sure I've left off a couple items, but African countries, Indonesia and other PacRim countries, and SE Asia are where tech labor outsourcing is heading next.

      This is a positive for these countries (standard of living will increase) and, in the long run, a positive for the US and other western powers (greater influence in those areas, long-term economic benefits).
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:India to start losing jobs. by easter1916 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Zimbabwe was quite a developed economy, until the glorious leader there went on a rampage of forced wealth redistribution and wrecked the economy. I understand that the supposed rationale was the righting of wrongs committed during colonial and post-colonial rule by the white "overclass", but the practical result of the half-assed way this was carried out (squatters, mob rule) meant that it was an utter disaster. I feel sorry for the average Zimbabwean, regardless of race or origin, because it isn't pretty for them right now.

    3. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

      Pretty soon, people in Zimbabwe will be coding :)

      Don't you mean Elbonia?

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    4. Re:India to start losing jobs. by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suspect all that's going to happen is that the move to India will slow, not stop. After all, if the so-called out-sourced jobs are removed from India, wages will drop, and it will become economic to move back, making use of the relatively skilled (I don't want to hear the insults, thank you. I've seen pretty bad code from all parts of the world, and consultants are by far the worst. It's not a country-thing, it's a "Do it by us or for us" thing) labour there.

      This is a positive story. India's economy has clearly benefitted, and other countries are about to have their economies raised by the same process. Jobs in America have not gone noticably down (though wages have decreased in some areas.) Perhaps global trade will result in a massive decrease in global poverty in the long run, as its proponents have always argued, to much scepticism from left and right alike.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

      You write that as if it's a joke. Sub-Saharan Africa is a big emerging supplier of tech labor, in the position that India was 20 years ago. We're already seeing major efforts in Nigeria, don't think for a minute that much of the rest of Africa won't follow.

      It's already well underway; I get emails from nice people in Nigeria all the time offering to share their money with me. They must be working pretty hard coding all those emails!

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    6. Re:India to start losing jobs. by bheer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      - A stable power grid (if it's not there, build a small one yourself)
      - An oversupply of labor with high population growth (to keep that oversupply rolling)
      - A sufficient percentage of English-speaking workers.


      And a government not run by a guy known for his misgovernance. Which pretty much rules Zimbabwe out.

    7. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      There's not really enough people in Africa, and with the problems they face, especially unchecked HIV, the situation isn't going to fix itself soon. Corporations should stop jerking people's lives around by moving jobs here and there, and just face the fact that in the long term they're either going to have to start helping more with solving these basic problems which keep very poor people around the world from improving themselves, or they're going to have to pay programmers a lot more cash for their services.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, "major efforts in Nigera."

      Dear Sir,

      I am ZALABAMBA MUSSAFAI 2nd heir to the prince of Nigeria. I am contacting you in good faith about a proposition of obtaining 75$ MILLION US. However, due to the money being in a foreign bank account, I need to get your help in obtaining 75$ MILLION US. I will gladly share with you TEN PERCENT of this massive fortune if you provide me with the following information:

      1) Your name, address, and phone number.
      2) Your credit card number(s) and social security number.
      3) Your bank information.
      4) 10$ THOUSAND US for initial transaction fees.
      5) Your birth certificate.
      6) Your passport.

      I hope that you respond to my generous offer.

      LOVE,

      ZALABAMBA MUSSAFAI, 2ND HEIR TO THE PRINCE OF NIGERIA

    9. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Charmless1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      And a government not run by a guy known for his misgovernance. Which pretty much rules Zimbabwe out.

      And The US as well
      --
      Cheney's Valentine's Day poem: "Roses are red, Violets are blue, Say something I don't like, And I'll shoot you, too."
    10. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      "There's not really enough people in Africa"
      I disagree -- it's not the number of people, it's the number of people in the excess labor pool that counts.

      especially unchecked HIV
      Good point. Though the HIV/AIDS problem has two effects on the labor pool -- reduces gross labor available, but increases un(der)employed labor, as markets dry up for more traditional produced goods.

      Corporations should stop jerking people's lives around by moving jobs here and there
      Not at all. Corporations should do what is in their best interests. If you, as a supplier of labor, are not mobile, that makes you less valuable to a company, and deservedly so.

      they're either going to have to start helping more with solving these basic problems which keep very poor people around the world from improving themselves
      You think the Gates Foundation efforts to stop the spread of HIV in Africa are completely altruistic? It's pretty cynical to think that developing another labor market is the primary reason for the efforts, but it's a not-so-coincidental side effect in my book.

      or they're going to have to pay programmers a lot more cash for their services.
      Nonsense. I know it's frustrating to realize you have to compete with labor in the Third World, but welcome to the 21st century. It happened to manufacturing in the US last century, and it's happening to technology now. Like it or not, it IS the future -- so you better figure out a way to make yourself more valuable than developers elsewhere.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:India to start losing jobs. by line-bundle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty soon, people in Zimbabwe will be coding :)


      You seem to have picked zimbabwe for no reason, but I do hope you realize that until fairly recently Zimbabwe was not third world (I lived there most of my live). When I was there there were linux clubs, mac clubs.

      It has a lot of coders, but most have gone to South Africa and the UK as they are paid better wages. Heck, I am in the US (but not coding, thank goodness!).

    12. Re:India to start losing jobs. by nuzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The misgovernance just has to favor corporations, and more or less equally as a class (more of course if you grease the right palms). The US is still the land-o-plenty in that respect.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    13. Re:India to start losing jobs. by jcr · · Score: 1

      most have gone to South Africa and the UK as they are paid better wages.

      Doesn't fleeing a dictatorship have something to do with it as well?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    14. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not at all. Corporations should do what is in their best interests. If you, as a supplier of labor, are not mobile, that makes you less valuable to a company, and deservedly so.

      So what, I'm supposed to move to Zimbabwe now?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    15. Re:India to start losing jobs. by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its kind of hard to get a corporation to invest a lot of money in a country where the government is not all that stable, revolution is a strong possibility, warlords rule the countryside, and people kill each other because they believe the person put a spell on them. This describes a large chunk of Africa. There may be cheap labor and eager workers, but until the basic issues are taken care of, a prosperous economy will still be years away.

    16. Re:India to start losing jobs. by corbettw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has a lot of coders, but most have gone to South Africa and the UK as they are paid better wages.

      Not to mention, they're less likely to be, you know, murdered or raped (or both) by Mugabe's thugs.

      The biggest impediment to Africa being the next India are the African warlords who keep the continent stuck in the 13th century.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    17. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      RE: your last point: I don't actually compete with labor in the Third World, I boss them around. My job can't be outsourced as easily as low-level programmer's jobs can be. I don't think that your argument effectively counters my argument that the exhaustion of cheap and skilled labor worldwide will necessitate paying more for programmers. At the company I work at we're already starting to ditch China and India - and we practically invented outsourcing to those countries. We're not going to decrease investment in those countries, but new investments are going to start flowing towards Brazil and Russia. We're seeing sharply increasing costs with respect to our China and India operations. Our reasoning is that if we're going to pay a lot for programmers, we may as well pay the money to get good ones. The Brazilians and Russians have two things going for them - they are still relatively cheap compared to the US, and they aren't submissive sycophants like the Indians tend to be.

      So maybe my last point wasn't clear. I'll restate it a different way: If companies want to continue to find cheap labor, they're eventually going to have to create it themselves, because we're fast exhausting what we've got. My preference is for the fetish for cheap labor to be abandoned in favor of a focus on domestic competence. Expensive it may be, but it's better for everyone.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    18. Re:India to start losing jobs. by bunions · · Score: 1

      If you honestly think the US has a bad case governmental corruption, relative to the rest of the world, you need to leave the US more often.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    19. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Yez70 · · Score: 1

      Well at least an African accent is easier to understand than an Indian one... Maybe customer service will improve.

      Hopefully the African comprehension of the English language is better too.

    20. Re:India to start losing jobs. by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was about to write that! But, it's the best kind of joke, one with some truth, in that for that country to be responsible for so much spam, they gotta have a few tech savvy individual there and that's a rung on the ladder. Unless all those nice Nigerians are really hackers in Wisconsin spoofing the Nigerian email addresses.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    21. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Makes a lot of sense. As you say (I think), eventually all the investment in developing nations will result in few (and smaller) labor markets where there is a cost advantage for employers -- and at that point, what we'll likely find is that government regulations on labor and taxation will be the biggest deciding factor for where to outsource to. Even now, government policies and regulations play a large role -- one of the reasons Brazil and Russia labor markets are so attractive is the lack of government 'interference' with employment (IIRC).

      In terms of what's best for everybody, I disagree with you, though. I think the marginal effect on quality of life is much greater in the third world than here in the US, and from a purely moral standpoint, there's a greater humanitarian return on hiring labor overseas than here. As long as the ROI is greater there than here, it works for the employer as well. But that's from a 'We're all one people' standpoint, sans nationalism. And of course, it also assumes that the consumers of your product either don't care about your hiring practices, or don't know about them. This is, I think, where it gets tricky -- look at what consumer preference did for American-manufactured goods in the 1980s -- this is quite possible with tech jobs in the coming decade(s), especially as more people become employed by the tech industry.

      That said, tech jobs are inherently portable, so we're unlikely to see tech outsourcing destroying the economies of entire regions the same way manufacturing outsourcing did in the 70s and 80s (and continues to do today).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    22. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Good point, and of course those issues are not settled yet in so many places. Looking back, I should have stated 'stable infrastructure' (which implies ~stable government) instead of 'stable power grid'. Though RYO applies to governments as well as power grids in this day and age -- we'll be moving from banana republics to tech republics as we use up (by developing) existing cheap labor markets in areas with stable government already.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    23. Re:India to start losing jobs. by skubeedooo · · Score: 1

      For tech jobs an extremely important factor is the quantity and calibre of university graduates. India has for many years had an education system far better than their GDP would indicate. According to the Economist, India produces 2.5 million graduates a year, of whom 250,000 are engineers. Whether many african countries can match this, I don't know.

    24. Re:India to start losing jobs. by nuzak · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's so much corruption as culture. By and large, the population of the US has been convinced that insofar as the targets of our resource expenditures go, the number one priority, bar none, is to maximize the immediate profit return of corporate entities. This is euphemistically referred to as "The Economy". Environmental protection, public health and safety, absolutely everything you can think of is measured against its effects on The Economy, and whatever might Hurt The Economy by redirecting resources away from it is strictly verboten.

      I'm a capitalist, believe it or not. Capitalism tends to have the highest overall efficiency, leading to the most equitable opportunity, if not outcomes There's a lot you can do with a strong economy, and a crashed economy is one of the worst things to happen to a society. I'm not anti-corporate, despite some of my rhetoric, and I certainly can't see myself advocating from socialist position. Still, the primacy of The Economy as the sole benchmark of a society's health is ridiculously one-dimensional... doesn't anyone read those Citi billboards (talk about a cynical ad campaign) and think that maybe whole societies should start focusing on living richly too?

      I should probably go on about it on a blog or something, and let my ranting be ignored in the rest of the blogosphere, as spending 5 minutes to post on slashdot (from work, ironically) is probably not the best medium for the message.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    25. Re:India to start losing jobs. by anothergene · · Score: 1

      "- A sufficient percentage of English-speaking workers."

      What? Have you tried called Dell Tech Support lately?

      --
      Who's leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?
    26. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Ansonmont · · Score: 1

      Just at the top. I deal with government workers all the time. I have yet to see/hear of ANYONE asking for a bribe to do their job.

      However, there IS corruption in the US government. Mostly at the political level as far as I can tell, as well as the "few bad apples" in the police force. Just because the customs official isn't shaking you down for some bakksheesh at the airport doesn't mean that we aren't weighed down by corruption. See the oil/energy industry, timber/ranching on public lands, etc. You are correct though, a few other countries seem to think rampant corruption is acceptable and just the way it is, but the problem with corruption is that you really only know of the ones who get caught.

      -A

    27. Re:India to start losing jobs. by bunions · · Score: 2, Insightful
      However, there IS corruption in the US government.

      Sure. I'd never say there wasn't. You simply can't find a government free of corruption. But the guy I replied to made it sound like the US was the A-number-one place to come to if you want a smooth ride for your company, when it in fact is not. Environmental and safety regulations here may not be as strong as Europe, but it orders of magnitude stronger than (almost) anywhere in Asia, Africa or South America, and I only say 'almost' to avoid places like Japan and Singapore.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    28. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Just a reminder that Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) went Unilaterally Declared Independence (UDI) in the mid-70s by the ruling white elites, resulting in a decade+ of sanctions. Although the 'white man's burden' was certainly a part of it, there was a strong sense among the British, white, educated governing party that the country would go to pot immediately upon the instituation of popular democracy w/o historical context or a learning process.

      And now they have Mugabe.

      Economy in ruins, widespread corruption and murder and famine... glad they got those colonialists out!

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    29. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      They're from the other percentage of workers :)

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    30. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Urusai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even more depressing, South Africa, after a relatively smooth transition from apartheid, is slowly devolving into the same kind of typically stupid/corrupt sub-Saharan political incompetence, with ANC one-party rule and a stupid AIDS-denying, Mugabe-kissup (Mbeki) on the throne.

    31. Re:India to start losing jobs. by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      a few other countries seem to think rampant corruption is acceptable and just the way it is

      and that is what makes the difference. While Americans, especially those with political and business power, may be no more virtuous than their counterparts elsewhere, most people with power are smart enough to recognize that corrupt behaviour is something to hide. When a person is caught, someone will use that fact or even the perception of wrongdoing to pull them down. It's a form of checks and balances, most people in power are balanced out by other people or groups with power.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    32. Re:India to start losing jobs. by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      You write that as if it's a joke. Sub-Saharan Africa is a big emerging supplier of tech labor, in the position that India was 20 years ago.

      I just pictured some guy in India cursing (in Hindi?) because he can't understand the Nigerian accented English of his tech support person.

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

    33. Re:India to start losing jobs. by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Corporations should do what is in their best interests. If you, as a supplier of labor, are not mobile, that makes you less valuable to a company, and deservedly so.

      So it's gotten to the point where the reason for real human beings to exist is to benefit the fictional persons known as corporations?

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

    34. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the common theme? Once these shithole countries are "given back" to the blacks they go to shit. Say what you want about apartheid, SA was better off as a whole during those years than it is now and that is a fact.

    35. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Well certainly from the wider perspective what you can say is true. But this raises another problem in my mind. This is a little like outsourcing foreign policy. The interface between the US the the rest of the world is increasingly corporate, and isn't managed. The goals of this de-facto corporate foreign policy aren't even to maintain the interests of the US as a whole, but just the corporate segments of the US. And even worse, these corporations are competing against each other, which means that the direction can be contradictory, counterproductive, and inefficient when measured according to foreign policy requirements.

      Uncoordinated and unrestrained corporate activity overseas is much of the time detrimental to the goals of the nation. I think it could also leave people in foreign lands feeling a bit jerked around. Maybe so much that they declare a jihad against us. Leaving all of this up to the invisible hand of the market is probably not wise.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    36. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's gotten to the point where if you you value status in our economic system, you've got to make yourself valuable to the entities that control that status... just like any other societal system. The only difference between now and two thousand years ago, in this context, is who controls the status (in this case, wealth).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    37. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 0, Troll

      Awesome.

      Some Indian guy yelling bhen-chod at a Nigerian... love it. Though from my experiences with most of my Indian friends, it would be more likely to be a racist epithet.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    38. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      No, you're supposed to develop your skills enough that it becomes cost-effective to employ you here. Or, move to Zimbabwe.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    39. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, you're supposed to develop your skills enough that it becomes cost-effective to employ you here. Or, move to Zimbabwe.

      Did that. Of course, most of the educated in Zimbabwe are now dead, so I doubt anybody will be outsourcing there anytime soon.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    40. Re:India to start losing jobs. by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      Zimbabwe wasn't third world, but it is now, with inflation over 1000% and rising. It's one of the few world economies that has shrunken dramatically over the past decade, thanks to poor (well, terrible) government policies. I'd be interested in hearing how locals really view Mugabe, incidentally...

    41. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Khalid · · Score: 1

      Morocco

      Well Morocco is in North Africa, but reported to its total population Morocco has even more offshored jobs than India (30 000 : mainly french speaking, for a population of nearly 30 Millions, vs 700 000 for a population of 1 100 000 000 for India) that's 1/1000 vs 0,63/1000 some countries might even have more, like Ireland, but as they are smaller this fact not very publicised, for Instance Google has does all his European opereations in Ireland.

    42. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect to see Venezuela and its own glorious leader heading down the same way in some 10 years from now....

    43. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a positive for the US and other western powers (greater influence in those areas, long-term economic benefits).


      Economic benefits for whom, exactly? Clearly not the U.S. worker, since it simply means less work here. Can't be good for people at large, since it means less money in this country. So, exactly who does this benefit?
    44. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The biggest impediment to Africa being the next India are the African warlords who keep the continent stuck in the 13th century.


      Well, maybe we should stop funding them.
    45. Re:India to start losing jobs. by dcam · · Score: 1

      Now India will feel the pain as jobs are outsourced to Asia and Eastern Europe where rates are cheaper! Pretty soon, people in Zimbabwe will be coding :)

      Like hell they will be. You need a stable country first and that isn't happening any time soon. I'm not sure what news you are getting about Zimbabwe, but I know a missionary working there and a friend who has visited. There are massive food and petrol shortages and rampant inflation. A little over a year ago the government decided to make 10-20% of the population homeless by bulldozing their houses and shanties. This is aside from the rate of AIDS infection in the country (hard to measure accurately but thought to be >20%).

      --
      meh
    46. Re:India to start losing jobs. by dave1g · · Score: 1

      wtf? did you just say that tech companies should cure HIV instead of giving jobs to Africans??

      Thats some fucked up logic. Jobs to Africa would do more to turn around the HIV infection rate than any medical R&D. Richer population = higher educated = condom use. With he side beenfit of having a RICHER POPULATION!!!

    47. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      There's a problem with this that I can see. HIV is one (of many) factors that makes large parts of Africa very unstable and therefore unsuitable for business investment. Without a stable base for business, there's no hope of providing jobs in Africa which would help with their problems. And vice-versa too. It's a very tragic chicken-and-egg.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    48. Re:India to start losing jobs. by stealie72 · · Score: 1

      He picked Zimbabwe because it follows the rules of Krusty's Komedy Konsonants.

      Like Walla Walla.

      --
      I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem
    49. Re:India to start losing jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know about economy but Zimbabwe definitely lost a decent cricket team.

  4. Let me be the first to say... by soloport · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am standing beside myself with amazement. Such growth brings a tear to my leg.

  5. Most likely reason by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most likely reason that comes into my mind is a power struggle of some sort between management of that company. I bet someone was sold on an idea that moving jobs to India would cut costs, but then someone else was in the opposite camp and we just saw the result of that battle. Was any manager fired from the company within the past month?

    1. Re:Most likely reason by thc69 · · Score: 1
      moving jobs to India
      Maybe [Steve] Jobs decided that India wasn't as nice as he remembered it, so he doesn't want to live there after all. (It's a joke, folks. If you don't get it, forget it.)

      Or maybe he got it confused with Indiana (as Homer Simpson did).
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    2. Re:Most likely reason by squiggleslash · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Avie Tevanian left Apple in March. Rumors are that before he left, he was overruled by Jobs on three major issues:

      1. Tevanian was against the whole "Mac OS W" thing, where the whole of Mac OS X would be rebuilt upon Windows Vista
      2. Tevanian wanted Carbon, file system metadata, and menus at the top of the screen, removed from future builds of Mac OS X.
      3. Tevanian wanted Apple moved to India, because he likes Indian food. He's infamous for his home-made Chicken Korma, and the entire office loved his vegetable samosas.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Most likely reason by Shadowlore · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet someone was sold on an idea that moving jobs to India...

      How about a slight change in punctuation ...
      "I bet someone was sold on an idea that moving Jobs to India..."

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    4. Re:Most likely reason by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      How about a slight change in punctuation ...
      "I bet someone was sold on an idea that moving Jobs to India..."
      - just as well, the outcome is simple: some manager's ass should be fired by now :)

  6. Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple is a publicly traded company and as such here's what's important to them.....

    Making money for their stockholders.

    That means sweatshops for iPods and doing things like heading down the dangerous path of closing off the Darwin source for development so that OSS geeks can't find a way to make OS X work on commodity boxes.

    Apple is going to do what is best in their corporate interest. Surprised? Don't be. It's business

    1. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't be. It's business

      Doesn't have to be. Stand up and support companies that share and uphold your ideals and beliefs by giving them your money.

      Or you can go for the cheapest company and help them screw over your fellow man.

    2. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to stop vomiting this comment up on EVERY Apple related story?

    3. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

      Just a thought, but has it occurred to you that "being good," even at the expense of short-term profits, may very well be in the best interests of a company and its shareholders? The good PR is one significant, immediate benefit. Another (less likely, but still plausible) factor is the long-term positive effects of doing business in a happy, healthy society.

      Why is it so hard to believe that businesses, like individual human beings, are capable of doing good things when it's in their interest to do good things?

    4. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by HardCase · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, making money is obviously important, but it doesn't preclude doing the right thing.

      As an example, the Fortune 500 electronics company that I work for does most of its R&D in the US, but there are also R&D centers in other countries, mostly from acquisitions. It does most of its manufacturing in the US as well, even though it could get away with doing the job much cheaper in emerging countries, particularly China, where environmental rules are pretty slack and labor costs are much lower.

      We've got at least one fab in China, true, but it meets US safety and environmental standards. I'm sure that the pay is not what it is in the US, but if the pay there is like the pay here, it's above the national average for the job.

      Here in the US, we regularly win awards for going well above and beyond governmental requirements for environmental safety. We've got a fairly green operation, as much as possible, considering what it takes to do what we do.

      The company has established a well-funded charitable foundation that supports education and arts in the community and around the country - and even in the big tech downturn when we were losing billions of dollars a year, it was able to give away millions of dollars each year.

      And the thing is, we're not particularly different from most other large companies. So the "make money at any cost" mantra is getting pretty tiring.

      -h-

    5. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by anakuran · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apple='cheap';
      //error. does not compute.

    6. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by sbrown123 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Doesn't have to be. Stand up and support companies that share and uphold your ideals and beliefs by giving them your money. Or you can go for the cheapest company and help them screw over your fellow man.

      We live in a Walmart world, if we like it or not. Cheaper = better. Even if you refuse to shop there, the rest of the population will.

      Publicly traded companies know their only duty is to the shareholders. Countries, and the people that live in them, are to be bought and sold. If India is too expensive, move to the next cheaper labor.

      According to the "free market" system, poorer countries are suppose to get the jobs over time. The dream idea is that the poor places of the world will eventually level with the rich because of this. I don't see it with such optimism. I see more of a migration pattern where businesses go to cheaper parts of the world when another part becomes too expensive or has rules (employee or environmental protections) that they don't like. In other words, every so many years a proserpous economy will have to suddenly crash and die as all the international migration businesses suddenly disappear to another place to rape and pillage.

    7. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apple is a publicly traded company and as such here's what's important to them.....

      Making money for their stockholders.
      How stunningly naive. What's important is upper management's compensation. Any time there is a conflict between upper management's compensation and making money for the stockholders--and there quite often is--it's not making money for the stockholders that prevails.
    8. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't always work like that. Where I live, for example, Wal-Mart is currently prohibited from entering the market, precisely because they have a history of destroying communities and fucking people by way of its uncaring management and legendary bad taste. Whether you agree with the city planning commission or not (and I do) this is real money Wal-Mart is losing because they chose to be "evil." Even if the city let Wal-Mart in, it's far from clear they'd be as profitable here as they are in red states, simply because they have such a terrible reputation that nobody would be caught dead shopping there.

      Point? Being good can pay off. There are incentives for companies to behave responsibly. Often these can outweigh the benefits of being evil. Probably not in the case of Wal-Mart--hey, who cares about New York, anyway?--but certainly for companies like Body Shop, whose entire corporate image is built on socially responsible behavior.

    9. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making money for their stockholders.

      And this has to do with the article how? Having Darwin source allows a full blown OSX to run on commodity boxen how?

    10. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being 'good' only pays off when government interventionism prevents the 'exploitation' of the region. Since government regulation is 'dirty' this 'fails it.' Despite being a highly interventionist economy, the U.S. fancies itself and all intellectual discussion regarding economics as a hair from laissez-faire capitalism. Any of the hairs between laissez-faire capitalism like labor laws or environmental protection laws are inherently bad ('leave it to the market') and are simply seen as temporary aberrations that will eventually be removed. Except when the right lobby is about to lose it all because of poor risk management or greed, in which case protectionism is silently the champion of the people ('third world drugs' from canada). Those that suggest them are 'socialists' that don't realize that the 'USSR failed,' and are exactly what's wrong with America. Everything wrong with America is a result of this collectivist meddling. Less than #1 median educational results? Public schools. Inflation? Fiat currency. Energy dependence? Environmental regulation. Out-sourcing? Unions. Why did the WTC collapse? Environmentalists denied them asbestos! You get the idea.

      Anyway, Walmart doesn't really give a shit that they can't move into your community. They'd like to if they can, but if not well they'll just move into someone else's. There are Walmarts all over the place, and they're probably the second most successful business in the U.S. and account for the largest share of the slots in the top ten richest people in the U.S.

    11. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by plover · · Score: 1
      That is until the people in your town replace your current city commissioners with people more sympathetic to getting a Wal*mart. Unless you live in a particularly isolated or small well-to-do area, the people making less-than-average wages really do want to pay less for their cheap consumer goods. All it takes is a handful of noisy people to organize a "t'row da rich guys out" campaign.

      Sure, Wal*mart is legendary for their ability to strangle local economies. But people who are desperate for work still have to buy food and clothing, and they want those low Wal*mart prices just as much as you don't -- maybe even more. And if they're unemployed, or perhaps retired and living on insufficient fixed incomes, they may have more free time to fight for it than you'd have to fight against it.

      I'm not saying anything is likely to change for you in the short term, but I'm saying there's always an avenue for change to happen.

      And as for The Body Shop, it's funny you should mention them. Their store in the mall next to my office building closed earlier this year. (It's not relevant to your point -- this mall has tried to "upscale" their image by raising their rents, and has driven out virtually all of their renters in the last few years, not just TBS.)

      --
      John
    12. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by sbrown123 · · Score: 1

      Whether you agree with the city planning commission or not (and I do) this is real money Wal-Mart is losing because they chose to be "evil."

      That works until the Walmart lobbyists secure enough senators to pass a bill that "deregulates" companies from being bothered by local city councils. Because, according to the current system we have in place, federal rules and laws override state and local rules and laws. I think this, for a democracy, is backwards and it should be: local rules override state which in turn overrides federal . A people-first-bottoms-up approach. Alas, evil corporations like our centralized government.

    13. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by fuzzylollipop · · Score: 1
      Or you can go for the cheapest company and help them screw over your fellow man.
      yep, the americans are that way, short sighted and selfish, everyone that shops at walmart does this everytime they shop there.
    14. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1
      That is until the people in your town replace your current city commissioners with people more sympathetic to getting a Wal*mart. [...] All it takes is a handful of noisy people to organize a "t'row da rich guys out" campaign.
      Points well taken, but I don't see it happening anytime soon. I live in NYC, and one reason Wal-Mart failed in its bid to move in was actually a handful of noisy people who organized a "keep the Waltons out" campaign. This included not only local small businessowners, but also a huge swath of everyday working stiffs, like you and me, concerned about the neighborhood and the long-term implications of Wal-Mart opening down the block.

      So it works both ways--and even if Wal-Mart eventually seeps into Ozone Park, the lesson remains that they'd have had a much easier time of it if only they'd paid more attention to their corporate image in the first place.
    15. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Constitution will be completely useless in your scenario. It would also reinstitute segretation and result in a completely fractured country. It would also make not violating the law all the more complex.

    16. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      I see more of a migration pattern where businesses go to cheaper parts of the world when another part becomes too expensive or has rules (employee or environmental protections) that they don't like. In other words, every so many years a proserpous economy will have to suddenly crash and die as all the international migration businesses suddenly disappear to another place to rape and pillage.

      I think of it as crop rotation. Except instead of moving fields on time, we rape them barren and let them become fallow on their own.

      However, this is not a good thing.

    17. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by texroot · · Score: 1

      Surely you jest. If that were the case you'd see huge payments to executives regardless of company performance, and highly paid executives of declining companies keeping their jobs while firing large numbers of low-level employees to save money. Even if finally dismissed, executives would get enormous severance packages regardless of how well-deserved their dismissal.

      Err...ummm....I guess you have a point.

    18. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by plover · · Score: 1
      One last point, then I'll shut up :-)

      the lesson remains that they'd have had a much easier time of it if only they'd paid more attention to their corporate image in the first place.

      Wal-mart is a corporation, not a person, and suggesting that it somehow "learns a lesson" is misplaced anthropomorphism. Wal-mart has to fight zoning commissions and town councils in virtually every municipality they build in these days. Their business is wildly successful despite incessant criticism, bad press, illegal labor practices, and even vitriolic hatred from some of its most outspoken opponents. If they are capable of learning any lesson it is "what we're doing now makes money by the boat-load, don't change a single thing except for those few times when we get shut-out or caught."

      And getting back on topic, the same is true with Apple. Bangalore's too expensive? Good bye, and thanks for trying, here's a hearty handshake and two months severance. The lesson they obviously learned is "go where it's cheap, and maximizes return on investment," not "treat your offshore employees well and they'll reward you with quality products delivered on time."

      --
      John
    19. Re:Reality Check for the Cult of Apple (tm) by ap7 · · Score: 1

      So what you are really saying is that one must buy the most expensive services or goods and ignore the cheap ones, right? It is really funny how well that works, eh? Why not start by subscribing to a internet service that charges you more while providing less bandwidth? How about subscribing to low value high cost cellphone plans? After all, in doing so, they will probably be paying their (white, american/european) employees well?

      In fact, I do hope you are using Windows XP and not Linux and no open source software. This is because MS pays its employees while Linux is free. So no one gets paid at all. Talk about exploitation!

      Screw the market economy. It doesn't seem to work at all. We want expensive stuff!

  7. Re:or maybe apple sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought the hippies were all about india, them being "like all about peace and love and like totally in touch with the universe man".

    I mean, Ravi Shankar taught the Beatles to be smelly no-good useless non-contributing waste byproducts of society.

  8. Not that this should be a shock or anything... by GundamFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who sees this as utterly fascinating?

    In a way US corporation going to India stimulated this growth. It is interesting to me that India has changed because of outside investment but the way they have changed has made them less appealing to those same investors.

    Globalization is bitch, isn't it?

    --
    I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
    Mark Twain
    1. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Cleon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, that's capitalism. I don't know why anyone finds this mystifying; in search of a cheaper labor pool, a bunch of Western companies invested a bunch of money in a developing country. So much so that the "developing country" has developed so far that investing there just isn't the payoff it used to be. So now they're either going to look for another developing country to invest in, or decide that shifting their labor pool from country to country isn't the long-term investment benefit they thought it was going to be.

      --
      Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
    2. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by aussersterne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Capital can afford to move. Hell, it saves money each time it moves. Labor can't afford to move. It costs labor money when it moves. That's globalization for you. Capital increases and is free (as in freedom). Labor competes against other labor and is unfree (as in unfreedom).

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    3. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Am I the only one who sees this as utterly fascinating?

      The fascinating part about this is how by exploiting these people (Indians and Chinese, but also Poles or even to take older examples the Irish) we make them rich and reduce the differences between them and us. Shockingly enough, all that bad, shameful economy (can you remember of some "concious" person telling you not to buy Nike shoes because they were made in Chinese sweatshops?) did great good to them, in the middle to long term.

      In other words, let us exploit you, it's for your own good :-)

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    4. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's not mystifying at all. Your description of the events is accurate. What's annoying is that quite a lot of people went through quite a lot of pain so that a few people could learn what you described in a couple sentences.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    5. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      That is exactly my point... the trend seems to be moving towards normalisation.

      What is going to happen when we run out of poor economies to abuse and also what happens when we have to compete with these new and motivated economies directly? (Not just for jobs, but also in inovation.)

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    6. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by starm_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It goes to show that the markets _can_ moderate themselves and that outsourcing isn't necessarily bad in itself. It can help countries get out of poverty.

      IMO outsourcing only becomes immoral and akin to slavery when the jobs go to people who are kept poor by their government and we exploit this situation. When giving our business and jobs to those countries, we become in a way accomplices with the crooked governments. However, when we outsource to democracies like India that have, in spite of some problems of corruption, a government that acts on behalf of its people, it can lead to beneficial results for everyone.

    7. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by cowscows · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It can be useful to remember that the US had its share of horrid working conditions back when the industrial economy was getting going. Exploiting labor is not some new occurance brought upon by globalization. It's just a normal step on the ladder to economic growth.

      Not to say that it's all good. No billion dollar corporations should be making people work in unsafe conditions, regardless of what country they're in. But saying that a company is evil because they're having their good manufactured by people working for 60 cents an hour is a little short sighted if you aren't aware of the circumstances. There are places where 60 cents an hour is a decent wage, otherwise those jobs wouldn't be filled.

      The other argument is that since globalization is driving a lot of this outsourcing, that the profit produced ends up leaving the country of all the workers, where in the industrial age, it tended to stay local, because the factories were owned by local rich people instead of multinational corporations. That might be true to a degree, but the losses to that are likely outweighed by the sheer scale of manufacturing that goes on nowadays.

      So yeah, in the long term, it'll probably leave the world in a better place than it was before.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    8. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It can be useful to remember that the US had its share of horrid working conditions back when the industrial economy was getting going.

      Indeed. Working in a factory in those days was nearly as bad as staying home on the farm.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      can you remember of some "concious" person telling you not to buy Nike shoes because they were made in Chinese sweatshops?

      Yeah, there's plenty of reasons not to buy them - they're cheap crap.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Cleon · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      --
      Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
    11. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by mclaincausey · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Capitalism by definition doesn't have to have a completely unregulated marketplace. "That's capitalism" is an ampty platitude. What "that" is is a particular way of practicing capitalism that is unfair.

      In the past, Presidents like Teddy Roosevelt tried to place check on corporations in order to protect our economy. Nowadays, we are seeking to tear down all these successful restrictions.

      There a difference between free trade and fair trade. Exploiting economic imbalance to screw your own country's laborers is free trade, but it is not fair trade. If someone wants to outsource to the Third World, fine--but that decision should come with a tariff that makes it at least competitive to hiring workers in your own country. Otherwise, you wind up outsourcing your wealth and standard of living.

      Some might say that that's a great thing to do, but I think it is each country's duty to protect its own workers. That's what we pay taxes for.

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    12. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that your money goes to the USA.

    13. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Mr_Icon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it's a lot less clear-cut than that -- not all exploitation leads to better living conditions in the future, as you may destroy all social and/or ecological infrastructure in the region. This happens more often than you think -- we just rarely hear about this, since everyone who can end up leaving the place, and those who can't just, well, die off, and nobody ever hears about destroyed villages or poisoned valleys where nobody can ever live again for 20 years.

      However, you are right about one thing -- "don't buy these shoes because they were made in sweat shops for 2 cents a day" rhetoric is often counter-productive, or at least counter-intuitive to many people. If someone voluntarily agrees to work 16 hours a day in a sweat shop making shoes for shitty pay, it's because their prospects otherwise would have been much worse. In the mind of a Westerner, if it wasn't for the mean and nasty Nike forcing the teens to stay in the sweltering building gluing shoes together, they would be running around frolicking in the sun, or hanging out with their friends playing Nintendo. Of course, the reality is that if these kids weren't there, they'd be probably scouring the nearest malaria-infested dump for food morsels, prostituting themselves to tourists, or doing whatever else they must do to just plain survive, all while also figuring out how to take care of their 5 younger siblings.

      The reprehensible thing here is that big corporations are taking advantage of these people's conditions to maximize profits, but you would hardly be improving the situation if you forced them to shut down their business and leave altogether.

      In much of this world, you really have to think in terms of "what is the lesser evil." Sometimes big corps are the biggest evil, sometimes they are almost charitable in comparison.

      --
      If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    14. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      That isn't the only reason, though. This discussion is focusing on tech jobs, but we should also recognize that a big chunk of the service industry moved to India as well, providing phone support and ordering for all kinds of businesses (not just computer-related ones).

      It turned out, however, that North Americans (U.S./Canada) didn't respond nearly as well as many 'analysts' thought they would, for two reasons: a) the English of the Indian employees was often so thick as to be partially or entirely unintelligible to North Americans, and b) the Indian accent itself was (for reasons unknown) particularly irritating to North Americans, who were then far less likely to cut the person on the other end of the phone any slack. This may seem odd, but just as many North Americans find British and Australian accents 'sexy', they find the Indian accent annoying.

      Does that means the jobs are coming back home? Hell, no; the same companies who sold the service portion of these industries the line that India was a great place to migrate to have now told them that other places (specifically, Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia) are a better bet. Their 'studies' show that the English spoken by these folks is more intelligible to North Americans and the various accents aren't considered to be annoying.

      We'll see how that one pans out. Frankly, given that Australians make about 60% of what Americans do I think it'd make far more sense to move to Australia both for the lower wages AND for the accent that so many North Americans get all hot and heavy over. Seems like the best deal overall.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    15. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we make them rich and reduce the differences between them and us.

      But that won't rid them of that annoying goddamned accent. If I hear another indian accent, I'm gonna go postal. Jesus fuckin' christ their english is annoying.

    16. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO outsourcing only becomes immoral and akin to slavery when the jobs go to people who are kept poor by their government and we exploit this situation.

      How is, "Here's a job offer, take it or leave it," akin to slavery? Is it because that job offer would only make a poor person a little better off, instead of a lot better off? Come on. Slavery is when you're not allowed to quit your job.

      When giving our business and jobs to those countries, we become in a way accomplices with the crooked governments.

      When the government takes away someone's food, isn't it humane to feed him? When the government takes away a man's income, isn't it humane to offer him a job?

    17. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
      Dont forget that this all started with the finance minister Manmohan Singh (now prime minister of India) decided to bring liberal policies in 1991. US corporation jumped on it looking at the opportunity to ride on that wave an tap cheap educated mass of India.

      It has gone well so far, but I dont think it will slow down. The way India is focusing on building infrastructure and providing services (for 1bn ppl and counting), it has a long way to go. Banks are using latest technology (ATMs, Credit cards, eCommerce, mCommerce), GSM networks and other data network services mushrooming all over the nation, railways reservation, online stock exchanges, VoIP services and so on is just beginning. You cannot ignore the fact that huge market like India will have internal demands to sustain its growth rate.

    18. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      not all exploitation leads to better living conditions in the future

      Yup, perfectly true, but the way we hear it here in our northern countries, exploitation is systematically bad, I felt glad that I found a pertinent POV showing just the opposite.

      And to conclude on the rest of what you said, I guess we can say that although that kind of exploitation isn't necessarily the nicest way out of misery for these countries, it's certainely the fastest and most efficient.

      See how it's been, within monthes, everybody started outsourcing to Poland, then Poland got too rich to be interesting anymore, then same now for India and China. The way things are going for these three countries, I'm surprised such countries as Mexico didn't yet get any richer. Oh well, maybe the rest of the poor countries of the world are on the list.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    19. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      What is going to happen when we run out of poor economies to abuse and also what happens when we have to compete with these new and motivated economies directly?

      Although things went fast lately for some countries, you can count decades before we run out of poor countries to abuse. Remember, there's 2 billion people out here who don't have access to electricity. As rich as we can be, it'll take some time before we fulfill these people's countries with money.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    20. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      There are places where 60 cents an hour is a decent wage, otherwise those jobs wouldn't be filled.

      Indeed, people need to remember this, after all, even if it's nicer to work in a factory in France than in China, if you look for equivalences, it's quite the same thing, well, it's an equivalent thing. Nobody forces people to work in factories in China, nobody forces people to work in factories in France, and even if in both they don't like this job, they're glad they have it.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    21. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      See how it's been, within monthes, everybody started outsourcing to Poland, then Poland got too rich to be interesting anymore, then same now for India and China. The way things are going for these three countries, I'm surprised such countries as Mexico didn't yet get any richer.

      They did: the rich people in Mexico are richer than ever, while the poor stay dirt-poor. This is what happens when a country's government is thoroughly corrupt.

      At least China, for all its shortcomings regarding freedom and human rights, doesn't seem to have the problems with blatant corruption that Mexico has.

    22. Re:Not that this should be a shock or anything... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      In the mind of a Westerner, if it wasn't for the mean and nasty Nike forcing the teens to stay in the sweltering building gluing shoes together, they would be running around frolicking in the sun, or hanging out with their friends playing Nintendo. Of course, the reality is that if these kids weren't there, they'd be probably scouring the nearest malaria-infested dump for food morsels, prostituting themselves to tourists, or doing whatever else they must do to just plain survive, all while also figuring out how to take care of their 5 younger siblings.

      So how is it that people survived, and even prospered, for thousands of years before huge Western corporations came along to employ them?

      Maybe people in these other countries should go back to a simpler, agrarian lifestyle like our ancestors enjoyed. It may not afford them all the latest crap, but is probably much healthier and happier overall.

  9. Why? Bad customer service I bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it only me that gets frustrated when my calls are piped over to India? I'm all for globalisation and outsourcing but when basic customer service suffers it serves only to frustrate customers, or me at least.
    I've lost count of the number of times I've literal just given up and hung up while trying to do simple tasks over the phone like notify change of address or query a bill.
    The 3 companies I've had particular problems with are Amex, Dell and Apple.

  10. India not so cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well looks like work is finally going to be coming back to the UK

    I never understood moving stuff like phone centres and manufacturing away from the customer-base.
    Sure the labour might be cheaper and all (offsetting transportation of the goods ) but you end up taking out of your control aspects that keeping it in-house provided.

    After the batch of Indian call-centre workers stealing UK account details and selling them I am glad such centres are comming back home

    1. Re:India not so cheap? by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      I too am all for domestic stealing of account details. Why should the Indians have all the fun?

  11. Re:Well hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So did a lot of people's waistlines in the United States - but that didn't stop productivity on the whole - perhaps at the treadmill...

    I think Apple's just grabbing straws at excuses.


    What a retarded non-sequitor post. It's not even Apple making the excuses, as they haven't offered any and didn't write this article.
  12. I can vouch by cimmer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The turnover is high, and the competition for good people is strong."

    My company is currently using Indian developers to augment our in-house staff. Every time the offshore company presents someone to us that cuts the mustard, we end up having to rotate someone else on after that person bolts for another company in India three months later. We keep getting told that demand is so high for QUALITY Indian developers that no one can keep them. They keep bouncing from outfit to outfit, getting salary bumps with each move. It's second hand information obviously, but it certainly does synch with what we've experienced.

    1. Re:I can vouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      if you like them and they add more value to your company - make sure they get paid.

      it stuns me how self centered companies are - the invisible hand is great when it costs others their money, but it is bad when it costs them money.

      hypocrites!

      the employees deserve the higher wages - you can pay it or let someone else do so...

      that's *YOUR* choice, not theirs. should they do less for their family to make *your* life more convenient?

      get real!

      how can companies who can't even spell loyalty feign contempt when others aren't loyal at the cost of doing less for their families?

  13. Today in the news by alexandreracine · · Score: 2, Funny

    "They just don't have any style." -Steeve Jobs

    --
    No sig for now.
  14. Re:or maybe apple sucks by mpathetiq · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not Apple Records, silly!

  15. Re:Well hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Apple's just grabbing straws at excuses.

    err, straws and excuses for what? Your analogy about waistlines made no sense at all and then you finish with that little gem.

  16. Time Magazine cover story by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    For those who haven't seen it yet, Time Magazine's cover story for this month's issue is titled: "http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171, 1205374,00.html">India Inc. and carries quite an in-depth (IMHO) opinion of "The rise of India".

    Not sure how the subscription model for time.com works, but I have been able to access all stories in the Cover article without a subscription:

    Bombay's boom
    Hooray for Bollywood
    India Awakens
    My lost world

    Worth a read.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Time Magazine cover story by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

      And the Economist's comprehensive survey of India from a couple weeks ago, IMO, is even better for understanding the changes taking place in the nation from the perspective of the Western corporate world, particularly the rise of "indigenous" business. India right now is a pretty damn exciting place to be.

  17. makes sense by William+Robinson · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There was an article on slashdot few days back, which claimed that 'Apple's iPods are made in China by women who work 15 hours/day, make $50/month, and have to pay half of that right back to the company for housing and food.' probably the reason they pulled out of India.

    India is becoming expensive in some parts like Bangalore. But Pune, Hyderabad, Delhi, Trivendrum are not that expensive.

    I still feel, it is not a good decision, looking at huge market (over 1 billion people) of India.

    1. Re:makes sense by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I still feel, it is not a good decision, looking at huge market (over 1 billion people) of India.

      I'm confused. They did not stop selling in India, in fact they just inked new distribution deals there. They just pulled out of hiring a significant number of developers and support staff there. Consider how many of those billion people are competent programmers versus how many are currently in demand. It is already nearly impossible to hold onto a good programmer there and a dozen major companies announcing that they are building big operations over there is not going to help. Apple is a smaller company which, luckily is pretty nimble. They can go somewhere else without taking a huge loss, unlike IBM and the like who react more slowly. I suspect smaller scale outsourcing to other places can yield much greater returns.

    2. Re:makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NB: "Hilarious" has one "L".

  18. A little premature to call it the right move by planetmn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the article:
    Yet he is also a tough-minded executive who knows when to cut and run. That's why Apple Computer Inc. has shelved plans to build a sprawling technical support center in Bangalore, even as IBM (IBM ) and other tech powers are ramping up.


    Doesn't the part of knowing when to cut and run imply that it was the right decision? The way I've always looked at outsourcing as an engineer is that you want to have people of varying backgrounds in any large organization. I think that India and China are part of this along with the US and others. Other countries will come into the fold as well, but I think that it'll be for the better of the company to have multiple groups with different backgrounds and experiences.

    Now, it sounded like this venture was purely for help desk, which I think is being performed at a commodity level nowadays (in the sense that all service seems to suck, given that good service costs money). In that case, moving to wherever it is cheapest is probably a good move. Though maybe they'll just add to the number of workers woring 15-hour days in China.

    -dave
    --
    /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    1. Re:A little premature to call it the right move by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      but call centers won't work in China... the Indians do everything possible to bring their people up to speed.. so you don't know they're NOT in the USA. They bring them magazines and books, watch american TV as homework so when you call they can banter with you about American Idol just like a person in the US. China would NEVER go for that... they're too controlling. China only stays in business because they have a thin layer of "salesmen" and a thick layer of bureaucracy between them and the workers. China has 1984 down to a science to control all the outward facing workers and keep them in line.

  19. D'OH!!! No wonder by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Homer taught all the Indians about paid vacations and golden parachutes and casual fridays and health plans, just a couple of weeks ago.

    Actually, that episode was good social commentary... It's basically what's happening. The Indian labour force is developing the sense of entitlement so near and dear to our hearts.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  20. Gotta wonder if the submittor by garylian · · Score: 4, Funny

    I gotta wonder if the person who submitted this article worked as a translator for Zero Wing...

    "All your base are belong to us."

    "India has grown at a much rapid rate."

    Yeah, seems like the same guy...

    1. Re:Gotta wonder if the submittor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still better English than what gets bibbity-bibbitied over most outsourced technical support lines!

      "Khello, compliment of the season and thanking you for calling technical support, my name is Hajib Al- Uh, I mean, Bob. How may I be helping you today sir?"

    2. Re:Gotta wonder if the submittor by Kuvter · · Score: 1

      That's because the article's wording was outsourced to India and his first language is not English you insensitive clod.

      --
      "To be is to do." --Socrates
      "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
      "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra
  21. What we're seeing. by Churla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What we are at this point seeing are the first steps in a cycle of balance.

    India has been in a horrible financial condition. It's got large amounts of debt and it's trying to work it's way out of them. This comes with financial assistance from the international community. You have many of these poorer nations not able to afford the subsidies anymore for farmers , which means more people migrating to the cities for the promises of these fantastic tech jobs.

    Problem is the cities aren't ready to handle all these people, and the government isn't ready to handle all this displaced workforce. Result? SLUM TOWN!

    Uh Oh, now the international community is on nations to provide a base level of support for their people. They don't want sweat shops and shanty towns of workers paid pennies on the dollar of what others get. India has to rely for a good deal on it's own people to solve this problem for themselves because they don't have the money to. If they want to they have to start taxing these companies more, which means.... costs go up. On an individual level? How to get out of the slum, you have to get paid more so you can afford to live there, you demand more pay.. they demand more for your contracting.. Costs rise...

    Suddenly all those cost benefits from outsourcing start evaporating.

    From my personal perspective.. yay. This is far more effective a way to "keep jobs here" than trying to legislate some mandate for companies to do so. In this case, the "free market economy" is actually doing it's job.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    1. Re:What we're seeing. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It'll take a long time for the business community at large to "get it".

      They'll simply shift the labour mills to asia, then africa, then maybe antartica (those penguins will work cheap )..

      Eventually, Americas economy will start to tank, and once it gets rough enough, *then* the jobs will come back.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:What we're seeing. by bheer · · Score: 2, Funny

      > (those penguins will work cheap )

      I'm Free, never cheap.

      --Tux.

    3. Re:What we're seeing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude you have poor understanding about India's economy. You assume that India will starve if the IT outsourcing goes away. IT industry forms only part of the indian economy. There are several companies which generate more revenue and profit than the IT out sourcing companies. You should note that due to strong economic fundamentals, India was relatively unaffected during 1997 East Asian Crisis. Also India's growth rate is second only to China. With booming Indian economy, India can survive without IT outsourcing.

    4. Re:What we're seeing. by Churla · · Score: 1

      Ah Tux...

      Don't deny... We've seen you, after long nights out with those tramps OpenBSD and Ubuntu. You get sauced and feel lonely cause you still don't get as many dates as that slut Windows, and next thing you know you're going home with anybody at the bar that will buy you a drink at last call.

      It's OK, we still love you, and we know that you're self image issues will work out eventually.

      Love,
      Us

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    5. Re:What we're seeing. by ap7 · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, yes. Another great economist. Here we go:

      > India has been in a horrible financial condition.
      > It's got large amounts of debt and it's trying to
      > work it's way out of them.

      Foreign Exchange reserves in India currently stand over 160 Billion dollars and growing. Ofcourse, that is lesser than the 800 Billion dollars or so that China has. But it is nothing to laugh at.

      > This comes with financial assistance from the
      > international community. You have many of these
      > poorer nations not able to afford the subsidies
      > anymore for farmers , which means more people
      > migrating to the cities for the promises of
      > these fantastic tech jobs.

      Yeah, right. A poor farmer turning a software genius overnight. Sure. And as far as subsidies are concerned, it is the subsidies that the US and Europe happily give their farmers that have caused Indian farmers to stay poor in part.

      > Problem is the cities aren't ready to handle
      > all these people, and the government isn't ready
      > to handle all this displaced workforce. Result?
      > SLUM TOWN!

      No. Slums come up because real estate prices go beyond the reach of people with low incomes. That happens because corrupt thugs in the government have neglected town planning for decades. That is changing. And fast.

      > India has to rely for a good deal on it's own
      > people to solve this problem for themselves
      > because they don't have the money to.

      The way to do that is to open the economy. That is what has been done. And obviously it must be benefiting the Indians because you are all fuming about seeing Indians earn more than perhaps they are worth in your opinion.

      > If they want to they have to start taxing
      > these companies more, which means.... costs
      > go up. On an individual level?

      Another approach is at work. Widening the tax base. With a booming economy, more people are able to pay taxes - which means more money to spend on several things - which means work on infrastructure, therefore more jobs and more money. Thats how the cycle works. IT companies are virtually free of major taxation.

      I am sure that the industry will grow as every part of technology grows cheaper and use becomes widespread. This will not only ensure further impetus in creating newer technologies but will mean more jobs - both for the US and India.

  22. Cheapness by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    We want cheapness! Even at being cheap.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  23. Expected by thePig · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This economic phenomenon is expected and was already discussed in this fora.
    As the demand for the work increases, to get the best in the business, one has to pay more.
    Also, the overall economic indicator increases along with it comes higher land rates + higher standard of living.
    This makes it much more costly for the average person too, which means the average pay increases quite a bit.

    Along with it comes the fast growth of the other economic indicators - more people get more vehicles etc.
    These things will start congesting the infrastructure, which also would act as a deterrent for new companies.

    Now the option is to go to not so fancied (earlier) sites in India (or any outsourcing nation), so that you get everything cheap.
    Since they saw the growth of fancied sites, they also would have improved the basic infrastrcuture to make it close to them.. without the current issues. But I guess Apple execs were lazy enough to not look at the new sites and stayed with the fancied ones. -- Yep, they had to pay for that.

    I guess China skipped these issues by using far-sighted (and possibly evil) government policies - ex - they forcibly decreased the standard of living in many areas - which meant you get more people coming to urban centers - which means the demand and supply chain stays the same.
    Also they improved the infrastructure by pouring in money for the same + they started builiding up a lot of suburbs to decrease the rising land-rates.

    --
    rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    1. Re:Expected by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1, Troll
      This economic phenomenon is expected and was already discussed in this fora.
      Forum is the singular, as this is just one forum.

      As the demand for the work increases, to get the best in the business, one has to pay more.
      Is supply and demand news to anyone?

      Also, the overall economic indicator increases along with it comes higher land rates + higher standard of living.
      Indicators do just that, indicate. They don't cause "land rates" or the standard of living to rise; they just show that they have risen or will rise.

      This makes it much more costly for the average person too, which means the average pay increases quite a bit.
      Pay rates don't rise until the supply/demand balance for workers changes. The fact that the cost of living is high just means that people may move away if they can't afford to live in a particular area any more.

      Along with it comes the fast growth of the other economic indicators - more people get more vehicles etc. These things will start congesting the infrastructure, which also would act as a deterrent for new companies.
      Again with the indicators... And by "clogged infrastructure", what exactly do you mean? The public transportation in India is already pretty clogged, and it's not deterring anyone. Try riding on a bus there.

      Now the option is to go to not so fancied (earlier) sites in India (or any outsourcing nation), so that you get everything cheap.
      Makes sense, follow the cheap labor.

      Since they saw the growth of fancied sites, they also would have improved the basic infrastrcuture to make it close to them.. without the current issues. But I guess Apple execs were lazy enough to not look at the new sites and stayed with the fancied ones. -- Yep, they had to pay for that.
      I wouldn't chalk it up to laziness so much as aversion to risk. Why risk being the only American company on the block when Apple's excellent reputation for customer service is on the line?

      I guess China skipped these issues by using far-sighted (and possibly evil) government policies - ex - they forcibly decreased the standard of living in many areas - which meant you get more people coming to urban centers - which means the demand and supply chain stays the same.
      • -1: Incoherent
      Was anyone leaving the big cities in China? Why did they need more people there to keep "the demand and supply chain stays the same"?

      Also they improved the infrastructure by pouring in money for the same + they started builiding up a lot of suburbs to decrease the rising land-rates.
      Yes, the Chinese gov't crated suburbs, mostly so that upper-class workers in the sities would gave a place to live that wasn't outrageously expensive. I don't think they did it to "decrease the rising land-rates", whatever that means.
      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
  24. where's the editor? by Chalex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's a "reason being"?

    "India has grown at a much rapid rate"? As opposed to "much slow rate"?

    It grew 9.3%? As in, the land area expanded?

    1. Re:where's the editor? by enitime · · Score: 2, Funny
      "It grew 9.3%? As in, the land area expanded?"


      Don't be stupid, that's so ludicrous it's not even funny

      Clearly the ocean receded.

    2. Re:where's the editor? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Admittedly his grammar was a bit broken, but he clearly means that the economy grew.

      That figure sounds like the entire economy- people in IT are having their compensation grow by 40% annually right now.

      China is not a viable option-- their english is atrocious compared to india (who have good english- just bad accents). I work with two sharp chinese guys- in the US now for at least 5 years and they are still almost incomprehensible at times. I have a friend who also works with a chinese immigrant who has a master's degree and yet people in my friend's office can't understand her and when she can't understand them she *pretends* to understand them instead of asking followup questions. Chinese nationals have problems with "face" that prevent them from asking 'stupid' questions.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:where's the editor? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously, Slashdot is outsourcing its editor jobs...

      "Slashdot. News is for the nerds. Stuff that is the matter."

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  25. Next Outsourcing Destination: China by darth_borehd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    India is going through a tech boom similar to the U.S. tech boom in the 90's. Qualified computer-related experts are demanding higher and higher salaries and jumping to whatever company is the current high bidder. As the wages go up, the rest of India's economy booms. India is beginning to take on many of the good and bad aspects of the U.S. economy. With most of its over 1 billion people in povberty, China can out compete India easily on wages. Training just 1% of that number with technial support produces a 10,000,000 strong workforce. The process of U.S. jobs migrating to India will happen to Indian jobs over the next 5-10 years as China becomes the outsourcing destination of choice.

    1. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Chinese speak Chinese. This is a big problem.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    2. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by bsartist · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Chinese speak Chinese. This is a big problem.
      China is the largest country in the world right now, in terms of population. So is the lack of a common language their problem - or ours?
      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    3. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Er, not quite. India is about 15–20 years behind China, as far as the state of economic development goes, and this includes outsourcing from the West. The reason you think China is trailing India is that India's boom coincided with the IT bubble in the States, whereas China's has been ongoing for two decades longer; India's development was therefore much more visible to you in your particular (I'm assuming IT-related) industry.

    4. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was having this exact conversation with an Indian coworker who said more people speak Chineses than any other language. My response was that English is the most common second language in the world and thats a better metric for the future. In a generation every the unofficial European language will be English (if it isn't already - I have a German friend who, after moving back, was surprised that the large German company he works for conducts all business in English). India speaks English, The US & Canada speak english. In other parts of the America's English is the second language learned.

      The other thing people forget to mention is Mandarin vs Cantonese. I used to have two Chinese coworkers that could only communicate in English because of this very problem. Here we have a country that can't standardize on a common language, and we're all supposed to learn "Chinese" in order to make it in a future world market?

    5. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by Sdoh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > So is the lack of a common language their problem - or ours?

      It depends on who is paying. :)

    6. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by wheatking · · Score: 1

      excellent point ! not many get the "timing" of india's IT boom coincident w/ the US growth in IT and that whole Y2K thing that gave the US IT folks a good look at the cheap labor available. the fact that nothing came of Y2K further buttressed perceptions of india as a cheap and "good" outsourcing destination.

    7. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the CIA Factbook for level of poverty...see same for the United States.

    8. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by ricosalomar · · Score: 0

      'Chinese' is not a language, dummy.

    9. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, English is spoken at least as a second language by many times the population of China. So now who has the language problem?

    10. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      The lack of a common language is a problem for anyone who would like to hire or be hired without also hiring a slew of translators or language instructors. Although many people complain about culture and language problems when dealing with Indians, at least they do speak a variant of English.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    11. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try talking about "Mandarin" and "Cantonese" to people from China and they'll tell you they aren't languages. Some get quite offended to hear Chinese called Mandarin. They don't like our generalizations about their dialects. IME, people from China refer to their language as Chinese.

    12. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by khallow · · Score: 1

      China is the largest country in the world right now, in terms of population. So is the lack of a common language their problem - or ours?

      If they're setting up US-oriented call centers or other English-oriented business, then it becomes their problem.

      Also, India is catching up to China in population. Should we switch back to English when they finally pass China in a few decades?
    13. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by 808140 · · Score: 1

      You are completely incorrect. Mandarin is spoken as a native language by more people than speak English as a second language. A simple Google search will demonstrate that there are roughly 800 million native speakers of Mandarin today, and over 1 billion speakers (including people who speak it as a second language). By contrast, there are only 500 million or so speakers of English in the world today, which includes people who speak English as a second language. I know, you're thinking to yourself, what about India? In reality only the educated in India speak English well enough to be considered fluent by any standard -- and with poverty as widespread as it is in that nation, it should be hardly surprising that most people there are not really conversant enough to be considered real secondary speakers.

      Of course a simple google search will verify all of this, but since this is Slashdot and people are lazy, here is a rather involved article on the topic.

      I will grant that at the rate people are learning English these days, English may one day pass Mandarin, but it's going to take a while.

    14. Re:Next Outsourcing Destination: China by 808140 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mandarin vs. Cantonese is a non issue. The only people who are able to speak Cantonese and not Mandarin are in Hong Kong (and that number is decreasing rapidly, as the importance of trade with the mainland increases) or in various isolated communities in other countries (which often speak relatively non-standard dialects of Cantonese at home, and some other more common language on the street -- for example, Toishanese in SF Chinatown.)

      There are many speakers of Cantonese, of course -- it's one of the major sintic languages -- but on the mainland it has fangyan status and is not taught in school, and with the exception of media coming out of HK (movies, music, etc) it basically gets no official exposure.

      I have been told that in small villages in the south it is not uncommon to find schools taught in the local language, due to a lack of qualified teachers who both speak proper Mandarin and are willing to lead the life of a village teacher. The government takes the pragmatic approach in this case and considers education in a non-official language to be better than no education at all. But the books, teaching materials, dictionaries, and so on, all use pinyin to show the pronunciation of a character, which is based on the pronunciation of the dialect spoken in Beijing -- so children are exposed from an early age to how a character should be pronounced even if they themselves (and their teacher) is not able to faithfully represent the required sounds in the "official" way.

      When you add radio, television, film, and all other forms of media to the mix -- all of these are in Mandarin, as noted, with the exception of some HK stuff that finds its way into mainly Guangdong province -- it should be no surprise that children are speaking Mandarin better than their parents (for example, in Shanghai, it is not uncommon to find young children who cannot speak Shanghainese well at all -- and if they can, they are generally only heard speaking it to their parents, prefering to use Mandarin to talk to friends, as it is the language enforced at school.)

      Whether all of this is right or not is up for discussion, but it is important to realize that with the introduction of standardized education, television, and radio, national languages can replace local ones very quickly. For example, at the end of WW2, most French people still either did not speak French at home or spoke some wacky dialect that was only vaguely mutually intelligible with the "official" dialect of Paris and Tours. My great grandmother could not speak French well -- in Picardie they all spoke Chti, which I can sort of understand but most certainly cannot speak. Similarly, throughout the south people spoke not French but Occitan, a language that is now nearly dead (although a dialect of it lives on in Spain as Catalan, where it has official language status). In Bretagne they spoke Breton, which is actually mutually intelligible with Welsh, and well examples of this sort abound. Nowadays many of these local languages are either extinct or very near it.

      In the old days in Northern Germany vast swaths of people spoke Plattdeutsch (ik snakk platt!) which was at one point so important a language that many of the "German" loan-words in Swedish are in fact Plattdeutsch in origin (if you speak German and have ever been in a Dorf where old people snakk platt, you'll know what I mean when I say that understanding Platt is a bit like understanding Dutch -- not much. At all.) Nowadays most people speak Hochdeutsch.

      I mean, literally every country has examples like this.

      The local languages in China are unfortunately doomed to extinction in the same way that most of Europe's languages have died in the last century.

      Cantonese may be an exception, because of its status as an official language in Hong Kong, but even there nowadays everyone is learning Mandarin.

      Mandarin is prettier anyway, but rather harder to pronounce properly.

  26. elsewhere IBM is coined as Indian Business Machine by cpatil · · Score: 3, Informative

    With IBM CEO announcing $6 Billion for expansion in India, which also included setting up worldclass IBM Research centers, I think it was a bad move by Apple. IBM CEO & executives are much more experienced and powerful in the corporate world than Apple executives are. When Bach's player hits the road, Jobs will be forced to move Cupertino to Bangalore or he will move to Benaras ;-)

  27. Re:or maybe apple sucks by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    Not Apple Records, silly!

    But I thought the Beatles were profiting from everything I bought from iTunes. Are you trying to tell me they weren't? Somebody should sue iTunes's ass over this!

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  28. Didn't Dell do the same thing? by jscrew · · Score: 1

    Didn't Dell (or maybe Gateway?) pulled out of India a while back? If memory serves, there were a lot of consumer complaints about the customer service. I belive the main problem was a language barrier.

    Perhaps Apple felt they would hit the same problem and reconsidered? I guess maybe they're learning from another company's mistake... If this is the case, it's nice to see some corporate / organizational intelligence, even if that particular phrase is an oxymoron.

  29. Just Pay it Forward to Employees & Companies by mfh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They keep bouncing from outfit to outfit, getting salary bumps with each move.
    You can blame HR for this. HR needs to weed out people who have made these kinds of moves too much in favour of people with long term business relationships with their employers. Testing a person's loyalty is HUGE for HR and they do typically drop the ball on it more than they keep the ball in play.

    But blame the economy too. Companies have treated employees so poorly in the past, on almost every level, that there has to be some accountability for that. Every action triggers and equal and opposite reaction.

    Treat them nicely and they treat YOU nicely. Treat them poorly for long enough and they will treat every other company categorically as poorly as they have been treated. This permanence of occupational conditioning is dark and moody at the core. It embellishes and derives its source from a much larger problem of economic scale.

    People don't care enough about their fellow person, anymore. But the change has to start small and spread without being extinguished, like Pay it Forward.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  30. Re:elsewhere IBM is coined as Indian Business Mach by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    ...I think it was a bad move by Apple. IBM CEO & executives are much more experienced and powerful in the corporate world than Apple executives are.

    Or maybe they did not feel like competing for the scarce, good programmers with IBM and a few hundred other companies. Really, there are better, cheaper places for outsourcing and outsourcing itself has significant drawbacks. As for the relative competence of IBM and Apple executives, I think you may wish to review the track records in the last 5 years.

  31. What is it with the submissions today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    First the number formatting and now this:

    Why Apple Backed out from India? [redundant question mark]

    rmunaval writes "BusinessWeek reports [reports??] an interesting article on why Apple might have backed out from India. The prime reason being, [redundant comma] India has grown at a much rapid rate than expected and is no longer the [better - 'a'] cheap destination for the [redundant] companies. It grew at an astonishing rate of 9.3% last quarter."

    Incidentally the anyone with the slightest degree of familiarity with Indian English will recognize the syntax, which means the submission is from a particularly clueless Indian or a troll seeking to rouse Slashdot's never-starved Grammar Nazis.

    1. Re:What is it with the submissions today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Incidentally the anyone with the slightest degree of familiarity with Indian English will recognize the syntax, which means the submission is from a particularly clueless Indian or a troll seeking to rouse Slashdot's never-starved Grammar Nazis.


      [redundant use of article].. actually, redundant remark..
    2. Re:What is it with the submissions today? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Incidentally the anyone with the slightest degree of familiarity with Indian English will recognize the syntax
      Oh, absolutely. :-) Been chuckling to myself as I browsed through the thread; if you're Indian, Ind-glish usage is one of the first things you notice in an otherwise ethnic-free text.
  32. Became so expensive in just 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isnt it true that they had just setup a shop a few months back? So, back then they must have had some reasons to do it in the first place?

    I cannot believe the salaries just increased so much in such a short period... whatever were the reasons for the initial move couldnt have changed so quickly..

    This looks like one of those typical "management now (suddenly) believes" kinda screwup.. either they accidently looked at 1906 salary figures and costs instead of 2006, or maybe someone was suddenly replaced?

    Of course, the management would not admit the screw-up, so it is justified on some ground or the other.

  33. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you are in the minority. I love calling and chatting with akmed or apu about how to reboot my computer and then spend the next 20 minutes giving an english lesson.

    It's great fun and makes my day to the point that when we switched to DELL platinum support I ask to be transferred to regular PC support desks when I call in.

    I love the refreshing education on how people in india pronounce several common terms in a way that we can not understand let alone repeat.

    "I am too happy to help you, please wait while I get on my desk."

    you cant buy that kind of culture!

  34. why our editors need to go back to college by ltwally · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "...India has grown at a much rapid rate..."
    How does such pathetically poor grammar routinely make it to the front page? Having technological skills is a wonderful thing for a tech site's editors, but I think /. has forgotten that editors also need to have a solid working understanding of proper grammar and sentence structure. How the hell does anyone justify hiring these people as editors?
    --



    /dev/random
    1. Re:why our editors need to go back to college by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The editors don't actually "edit" and never have.

      Users submit articles, they sit back and click "submit" about twelve times a day, and watch fansubbed Sailor Moon episodes that they painstakenly re-encoded into .ogm files.

      Back in the day, it didn't matter so much. Now it's getting ridiculous, with retarded newbie typo's like "teh" making the front page.

      I forgot about slashdot for about a year, came back just the other day. It seems the user base (based on posting on articles) is about half of what it was a year ago, and hell, a year ago it was only a shadow of it's former self. It seems that only the most self-righteous of the OSS flamers are left. Technically adept users seem to be slim to none, as I'm seeing hardly any intelligent comments being left on any of the recent technical articles.

      To borrow a South Park qoute, non-gnome related, this site is literally dissapearing up it's own asshole.

      And before you ask, I'm here because it's fun to watch and be labelled a troll for not toeing the line and bowing down before the great Rickie Stallman.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:why our editors need to go back to college by Lactoso · · Score: 1

      Cut them some slack, they're from India...

    3. Re:why our editors need to go back to college by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Wait a sec... are you saying that these people get paid to update the front page?

      Count me in!

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    4. Re:why our editors need to go back to college by antdude · · Score: 1

      They probably don't want to pay editors who know spelling and grammars. In fact, I don't think /. editors get paid much.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  35. Re:Just Pay it Forward to Employees & Companie by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even if my company treats me like a god, I'm going to leave for a 25% pay increase.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  36. Godd news for Springfield by FoaadH · · Score: 0

    So you're suggesting Apple should move back to Springfield!

  37. Oops... by mfh · · Score: 1

    Even if my company treats me like a god, I'm going to leave for a 25% pay increase.
    Just remember never to let them read your /. acct!!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Oops... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I tell them the same thing every review.

      Just pay me fair market. If you let me get way below market, then I'd have to consider moving on. I won't move on for a few measley grand difference.

      They don't say the words but they basically say, "We'll keep you as long as we can make a buck off you and can't replace you cheaper with indians".

      So it is all good.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  38. Waiting for the party line on this.... by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    .... what will be the party line from the truly Apple Devout?

    1) Indian tech support is far beneath Apple's *amazing* tech standards?
    2) The Mercedes/Pinto comparison again
    3) ????
    4) Profit!

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  39. Did Jobs really have anything to do with it? by with_him · · Score: 1

    The article makes is sound like it was Steve himself that pulled the trigger. While he may be the noteworthly public face this sounds more like a high level manangement or accounting decision on not something that would have needed Jobs personal attention. When you get to that level you higher good people, pay them well, and then expect them to do their job and make you more money. Just My .02

  40. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1
    I love the refreshing education on how people in india pronounce several common terms in a way that we can not understand let alone repeat.


    Personally, I love getting transferred to the US. (I'm Canadian). I get to hear all about the evils of a "rooter", "wahless" connections, and the ever popular "lah bub" (light bulb). I also have the absolute joy of hearing temperatures given to me in fahrenheit, and clueless techs who have no idea what celcius is. I also have had the absolute joy of being asked for an American credit card, as it was inconcievable that there was a world outside of the US of A (mind you, this last item was in person, and I was also asked for California ID, rather on the phone, but the point remains). And of course, the USA's finest... *drumroll* being told that component cables would not increase the quality of picture on my PSX games (by a Sony rep).

    Yeah, I love getting bounced to the US.
  41. The rat race to the bottom by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This should have been obvious to everybody, but what happens of course is that as companies hire their workers in what are essentally third world countries and pour money into the local economy in the form of foreign capital, the local economy picks up and suddenly the price of labor in the market increases. This makes the whole outsourcing thing a bit of a rat race as everytime you find some suitable location with cheap labor and build your factory/office there, the cost of labor begins to rise until it's hardly worth the trouble of outsoucing in the first place. Then you have to look for a new place with a new supply of cheap labor to start the process all over again.

    The only way to prevent this from happening is to move into countries with brutal kleptocracies that will insure that the wages you pay never stimulate the local economy too much and the strong armed government thugs keep the people from setting up any sort of fair or equitable government. Your best bet is for those countries where two ethnic minorities have been fighting for centuries over some long lost or stupid reason. The downside is that it's very hard to find suitable working conditions in those type of countries because you generally have a big security problem and basic services like power and phone can be hard to come by (and unreliable). Also, you'll have to bribe government officials like crazy to avoid having your business raided, however in the long run it'll be cheaper than paying a decent wage to the workers. If you're really commited, you can surreptitiously fund one side of the conflict and give them enough of an upper hand to overthrow whatever government the country currently has and set up your own puppet government in its place. The only problem with this is that the puppets often try to sever ties with you once they get what they want (cheap slave labor and a country to call their own).

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:The rat race to the bottom by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only way to prevent this from happening is to move into countries with brutal kleptocracies that will insure that the wages you pay never stimulate the local economy too much and the strong armed government thugs keep the people from setting up any sort of fair or equitable government.

      Interesting theory, but the worst of the kleptocracies tend to have a hell of a time attracting any foreign capital or orders (Zimbabwe, Burma).

      The important figure isn't the wage, it's the productivity. You might be able to hire someone for ten cents a day in some countries, but they're not going to be able to build as many computers in a shift as workers in India, China, or Indonesia.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:The rat race to the bottom by eBayDoug · · Score: 0

      Having run a 250-person outsourcing company in the Philippines, I can vouch that your post is 100% accurate. Great post!

      --
      Learn About Outsourcing. http://www.pioutsource.com
  42. Bad fit for Apple by wchin · · Score: 5, Informative

    First, the BW article speculates... the author doesn't really know. So was it high wages? Was it something else? "We" don't know yet.

    However, there are several issues with setting up in India that probably make it less attractive for Apple.

    1) Worker loyalty: while all tech workers probably seem like mercenaries these days, it is even more so in India's white hot tech areas. The workers will leave for what we, in the U.S., would consider miniscule salary differences.
    2) Worker training: Indian workers are often broad brush trained in "popular" technologies - finding software engineers trained in non-Windows, non-Oracle, non-SAP, or non-J2EE tech is probably much harder to find at a cost effective salary. Again, this is an issue in the U.S. too, but more pronounced in India and many other non-U.S. technology boom areas.
    3) Best of the best: Apple is small (workforce numbers) and tends to follow the hire the best of the best (even if they don't give them the best of the best resources to work with). Those that are really good are probably already working in the U.S., or would not find it all that hard to make it into the U.S. The number left of the best of the best in India probably aren't much cheaper these days (one would often have to be 4:1 to 8:1 cheaper to outweigh the below).
    4) Big costs (not just money): Apple doesn't have huge projects that require a thousand or thousands of engineers on a single project that might be able to amortize the costs/issues of temporal and geographical displacement. Apple has most of its software engineering done in Cupertino, and it would take a big shift to deal with significant outsourcing or remote development.
    5) Core strength: software engineering is Apple's bread and butter, it is what differentiates the hardware, it is its own profit center. Messing with this too much is not a good idea. Apple can't treat this as a commodity item on a balance sheet.
    6) Expansion deals went through in CA: Apple bought a large data center and has plans to build another campus in CA - and the review of those deals going through probably meant that this Indian effort doesn't make sense for Apple right now.

    None of this particularly means anything with respect to India, India's tech boom, IBM in India, outsourcing to India, etc. This is merely Apple's evaluation on whether or not it makes sense for Apple. These issues have been there, will continue to be there. It is strange that Apple started and effort but then pulled out, but that is better that they are contantly critically re-evaluating rather than what we've seen from some other U.S. companies that have staked huge efforts on "hot trends" that some CIO/CFO/CEO reads in a trade mag, rather than doing true critical analysis. Going to India may make sense for lots of companies, but certainly not to the level we've seen it lately.

    1. Re:Bad fit for Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:

      7)The simple fact that the Indian employees were just rude and unpleasant. That's OK for someone like Dell that hates their customers and enjoys treating them like trash and stealing from them. For Apple, that obviously wouldn't fly. The only problems I heard here at work about the potential Indian expansion was about the hateful Indians. They treated us horribly, and our customers in our trials worse. You can talk all you want about other details, but when the people you deal with are so hateful, you can only deal with it for so long.

      It just doesn't matter how much money you save when your customers leave in droves and many of your employees quit because dealing with Indians is a horrible experience.

    2. Re:Bad fit for Apple by wchin · · Score: 1

      Rude and unpleasant describes almost everyone in customer support. I've dealt with both good and bad Indian customer support. It comes down to the companies, not the nationality or race. If the company wants to cut costs at the expense of customer satisfaction, then whether or not it is India, Buglaria, Ireland, China, Mexico, or anywhere else, it doesn't matter. In the end, as a customer, it is better to deal with people that can actually get stuff done. Getting employees to actually care about the customer is hard enough as it is, even in the U.S. or other affluent countries. Getting it done with rather stilted and limited call center scripts and techniques is even harder.

      This will, of course, all shake out over time. The question really is, will the U.S. consumer be willing to spend more money, on a consistent basis, for better support and customer service or not?

    3. Re:Bad fit for Apple by be-fan · · Score: 1

      For Apple, that obviously wouldn't fly.

      Are we talking about the same Apple that makes you make a fucking appointment just to see one of their "geniuses" to return a DOA product?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Bad fit for Apple by wheatking · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "miniscule" when converted to dollars maybe (and not usually) -- Companies are paying 15 to 30% increases over their previous pay plus some additional perks (Indian tax laws exempt most perks from income tax -- e.g. Car Allowance etc) for engineers/tech-support types to switch. while 25% of $20,000 p.a. may not strike you as something other than miniscule, it is 25% over the previous and it matters. btw, the word on the street in bangalore is that Apple did indeed pull out because of cost related issues. At 15% average y-o-y increase in employee compensation (total) and office rents and house costs equal to silicon valley (in per sq ft), Bangalore just isn't that cheap anymore and the quality is definitely questionable. i think, based on personal experience talking to entrepreneurs there that there is approx 1 clueful engineer for every 100 or so in the big companies there.

    5. Re:Bad fit for Apple by sufijazz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indian tax laws DO NOT exempt special allowances and perks. While this was a practice 5 years ago, the taxmen have wizened up and tax EVERYTHING that constitutes the magic number that gets deposited to your bank account every month. (Yes, salaries in India are paid once a month.)

      --
      2+2=5 for very large values of 2.
  43. U.S. Unions are the problem and the answer by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At one time, unions were sorely needed in the U.S. Workers had no rights and were thoroughly abused by rampant capitalists. The unions did a good thing there.

    Then the unions kept going, demanding more and more. Now in some cases, the work doesn't get done at all because the union guys are too busy taking breaks, waiting for wacky regulations to be met, demanding pay raises, waiting for a seventh guy to show up before they can move a chair... all that unbelievably abusive stuff that unions do now.

    So while laborers in third world countries suffer under miserable conditions, American unions keep fighting for higher wages and, well... less work. Is it any wonder American jobs are flying out of the country?

    If anyone is interested in a solution to this seemingly intractable problem, there is one and only one: for American Unions to stop fighting for ridiculous benefits in the states and instead to focus ALL of their attention on third world countries.

    If Americans stopped getting lazier and if third world workers started getting some equity... presto... these enormous disparities between our workers would start to diminish.

    1. Re:U.S. Unions are the problem and the answer by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      for American Unions to stop fighting for ridiculous benefits in the states and instead to focus ALL of their attention on third world countries
      A Union's core responsibility is to its members.
      If those members want or expect "ridiculous benefits", the Union has to negotiate hard with the Employers to achieve them.
      A Union would basically lose its members if it devoted all its time and money to improving the lot of non-Union members in the third world.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:U.S. Unions are the problem and the answer by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unions are losing ALL their members... because all of the jobs their members do are being exported. What good is a union that protects zero workers?

      It is in the interest of every union member to see better labor standards throughout the world. Until unions realize this simple truth, they are doomed to driving themselves out of work.

    3. Re:U.S. Unions are the problem and the answer by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Funny

      Too true. If it wasn't for the activities of the various unions of computer programmers, including the infamous Federated Union of Computer programmers and Keyboardmen, and the Association of System Specialists, programming jobs wouldn't be being outsourced to India all the time. If only computer programmers were, as a group, more anti-union, and didn't keep joining trade unions at the drop of a hat, maybe some of these jobs would stay in America.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:U.S. Unions are the problem and the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder Gene Orza was against the World Baseball Classic. When the unionized American team gets beat out by the non-union Cuban team...makes people start wondering what good the union is for

    5. Re:U.S. Unions are the problem and the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's about time they start.

      As it is, there are American programmers who take contract jobs and re-sell them to India. Way to protect the future of your profession, there, guys.

    6. Re:U.S. Unions are the problem and the answer by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny... but the Apple facility in question is a tech support center, not a programming house. Phone tech support is a service job, and there are indeed plenty of American unions covering such jobs.

      But my point was that American unions have set a general standard for American workers, not just for their specific market segments. As long as Americans think we are the greatest people in the world and deserve twenty times the pay of other people... we shouldn't be surprised when employers decide that a little less quality is worth a 90% cost savings. It is our own arrogance which got us here, and only a little humility will get us out.

    7. Re:U.S. Unions are the problem and the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utter and true bullshit. IT workers around the world (and especially American) are among the least unionized professionals. That is the reason why Americans only have two weeks vacation while most Europeians have five plus weeks. That is the reason why companies can force developers to work 12 hours or more without any paid overtime. That is the reason why coding isn't a very bright career path over there and it is no wonder that there are less students enrolling in technical courses each year.

      Now seemingly, software is a very profitable business, why else is Bill Gates the richest man in the world? Seemingly I can't see the problem with coders, who is building those profitable applications, demanding a bigger piece of the cake.

  44. Re:or maybe apple sucks by mpathetiq · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure in some way, Paul McCartney is making money... I mean, aren't most songs just Beatles ripoffs anyway? I'm sure he's getting royalties... at least for every Oasis song sold.

  45. China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They keep bouncing from outfit to outfit, getting salary bumps with each move.

    This applies to China as well.

  46. Wow it must be Monday... by vmichael · · Score: 1

    Time to wake up eh, I read the headline as "Why Apple Baked out of India".

  47. banglore expensive move to another city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you guys are failing to realize is the size of India. As Banglore has become expensive companies are moving to other cities. People like to be in Banglore because it is the epic center, but there are hundreads of other major cities.

    Apples 30 jobs are meaningless when last year alone infosys hired nearly 200,000 people, wipro 50,000 etc.

    The next day after apple news, IBM announced they are investing 6 billion in India.

    1. Re:banglore expensive move to another city by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      I would definitly like to be in the epic center, sounds extreme to the max.

  48. Ganesh is way cooler can Vishnu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EOM

  49. "Knows when to cut and run" by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    The article describes Jobs as "a tough-minded executive who knows when to cut and run."

    What? Cutting and running is always the wrong thing to do, in all situations, under all circumstances. It is always a craven act of cowardice. Nervous-Nellyism.

    A quitter never wins, and a winner never quits.

    When the going gets tough, the tough get going.

    Stay the course. Never give up the ship! Now matter how deep you are in the Big Muddy, the right decision is always to push on. Where would the lemmings be if they had turned back? What if Custer had chosen to retreat?

    Doesn't Jobs remember the Think Different posters with the pictures of Icarus, Captain Ahab, and the Earl of Cardigan?

    1. Re:"Knows when to cut and run" by jcr · · Score: 1

      Cutting and running is always the wrong thing to do, in all situations, under all circumstances.

      Thank god that Hitler subscribed to that belief. If he'd had the sense to abandon failed campaigns, world war two might have lasted another three years or more.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:"Knows when to cut and run" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A quitter never wins, and a winner never quits."

      Voted the least successful anti-smoking ad campaign of all time.

  50. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by cttforsale · · Score: 1

    I hear you! Is OnStar based in Alabama?!?! If it isn't Mammy, it's Scarlett O'Hara.

  51. Correction: TASTE, not style! by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

    "The only problem with Microsoft is they just have no taste, they have absolutely no taste, and what that means is—I don't mean that in a small way, I mean that in a big way. In the sense that they they don't think of original ideas and they don't bring much culture into their product, ehm, and you say, why is that important? Well, you know, proportionally spaced fonts come from typesetting and beautiful books, that's where one gets the idea. If it weren't for the Mac they would never have that in their products, and, ehm, so, I guess I am saddened, not by Microsoft's success—I have no problem with their success, they've earned their success for the most part—I have a problem with the fact that they just make really third rate products."
                                                  — Steve Jobs

    1. Re:Correction: TASTE, not style! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The only problem with Microsoft is they just have no taste, they have absolutely no taste..."
      — Steve Jobs

      Bender: "Stevey, I wouldn't talk about taste if I was wearing a black turtleneck and Levis."
      Fry: "Bam!"

  52. Never been a fanboy of outsourcing, but... by yagu · · Score: 1

    I've never been a fanboy of outsourcing especially at the expense of dismantling a work force's morale and decimating career goals and plans strictly under the auspices of driving profits. Personally I think these beancounter CPA-driven approaches are short-sighted and incur more damage than benefit.

    And now, these large companies turn their noses up at India and their work force. I can't think of anything more insulting (and embarrassing) than, from the article: " Another source familiar with the situation, though, says the decision was cost-driven. "India isn't as inexpensive as it used to be," the source says. "The turnover is high, and the competition for good people is strong." Apple feels it "can do [such work] more efficiently elsewhere."

    WTF? So, even in Apple's case, it ISN'T about quality of service, it's strictly (or so it seems) about bottom line. Can't say I feel totally sorry for India, it's a direct outgrowth of their own success, and I was one of the casualties of an outsourcing/cost cutting rave (turned out pretty well, though). But it's disconcerting to think everything becomes only about money to the exclusion of seemingly any other factors.

    1. Re:Never been a fanboy of outsourcing, but... by wchin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It surprises you that money is the overriding concern? It is most likely that Apple is putting those jobs in Cupertino, CA, and the remark about efficiency is exactly that. Apple may find it more efficient to have the software engineers in Cupertino and the cost savings of going to India isn't worth it. If it is worth it, then by all means Apple should be there. Apple has outsourced much of its hardware manufacturing - it made sense to do so. Apple's management has a duty to its shareholders first and foremost... everything else is and should be a secondary concern.

      Further, this isn't about outsourcing the software side - this is about Apple setting up another in-house development site. The arguments pro/con outsourcing is mostly irrelevant here. The discussion here also wasn't about the call support centers of which Apple runs a bunch from a variety of countries.

    2. Re:Never been a fanboy of outsourcing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? So, even in Apple's case, it ISN'T about quality of service, it's strictly (or so it seems) about bottom line

      Why is it that so many /.'ers think that Apple is somehow above the same tactics as the rest of the large corporations today? Pull your head from the sands and you will notice they are no different. Stop it with this insane hero worship, you come off looking like a 12 year old fanboy.

  53. Re:or maybe apple sucks by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Informative

    I mean, aren't most songs just Beatles ripoffs anyway?

    Why yes, 'Master of Puppets' is obviously derived from 'Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds.' I'm not sure about 'Jesus built my Hotrod', though.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  54. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    How much do you personally contribute to those companies' bottom lines?

    If you're not spending big bucks, making them a lot of money, don't expect top-notch service -- it's too expensive. Re: Amex, get a corporate account -- the support is much better.

    Ditto for Dell, I don't know about Apple.

    At any rate, you get what you pay for... and every time you pay a little less than expected, keep in mind that part of what you're NOT paying for is better service.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  55. Re:or maybe apple sucks by 'nother+poster · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, there are easier ways to commit suicide than taunting Liam Gallagher in an online forum.

  56. Their problem by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    We have the hard currency.

    Of course that might change.

    Also note that Americans and Europeans have an inflated opinion of Chinese people. The vast majority of Chinese to immigrate to the 'west' in the last few decades have been graduate students in technical subjects.

    In other words most of what we've seen is their top 1%. China has inbread rednecks, arrogant sons of politicians and criminals same as anywhere else.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Their problem by lfnoise · · Score: 1
      We have the hard currency.

      Yeah, GWB is printing it right now on presses made in China, bought with money borrowed from China, in order to pay back China.

  57. Re:or maybe apple sucks by pete6677 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but hippies don't like anything that favors corporate America in any way, so they would not support sending jobs to India, even if it helps people over there.

  58. Re:Just Pay it Forward to Employees & Companie by bettlebrox · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I don't think it's necessarily HR's fault. How you get people to be loyal to a company who is only in the country looking for cheap staff? You know many companies will leave for the next cheap place that the big analyists will start recommending.

    And to can compare what is happending in Indai to the "Dot Com" era in the US. Lot's of people entered the tech market for the money, many jumped jobs every 6 months for better paid jobs. If you were in anyway good technically you could command a premium wage. Sounds famaliar? (Then the arse fell out of the market).

    Indian developers in India are basically doing the same thing, they're taking advantage of a tight labour pool. And the really good developers/techies in India are getting good wages and aren't likey to jump ship to some "new" US (or European) company looking for low-cost India programmers.

    For example I know of a manager who was told to hire the 3 new employees in India. He was was there for 2 weeks, settled on 3 lads and on the start date only one showed up. I'm sure the other 2 got better jobs based on the job they had in hand, or got headhunted.

    I've been saying to others that at the moment I suspect that any company trying to start an India technical operation at the moment will have a hard time of it because all the good technical people already have good paying jobs and the only people they'll be likely to recruit will be medicore. Unless they pay good wages, and lead to an expectation of a long-term job.

    I think at the moment if a company wants good staff for less money they may do better looking at locations inside the US such as Salt Lake City and other mid-Western states.

    --

    I have a very small mind and must live with it.
    -- E. Dijkstra

  59. The Earl of Cardigan? by Animats · · Score: 1

    Cardigan? The one who sent the Charge of the Light Brigade off in the wrong direction through ego and stupidity? Apple used him on a poster?

    1. Re:The Earl of Cardigan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... That would be the trend of all those listed (Icarus, Captain Ahab, and the Earl of Cardigan)... Pride leading to downfall and all..

  60. And Torpedos! by rueger · · Score: 1

    Damn them!!

  61. Like you did'nt understand? by HornWumpus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Idiot grammerian.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  62. Re:Just Pay it Forward to Employees & Companie by theCat · · Score: 1

    Good HR and hiring is important, but I'm afraid there is just too much money moving around to finese things. I worked US-side in a company that ran India-side outsourcing. I interacted with the India team every day. It was interesting to watch: The people there seemed happy, but once they worked for a year they left. I suspect it was for money. Can't blame them; when there is so much money coming into an economy and businesses are trying to grow by leaps and bounds, and even small increases in skills earned on-the-job are suddenly of great value, you first demand a raise and then you jump. Hopefully those I knew briefly ended up in quality jobs for good companies. I know they are doing much better financially than just a few years ago.

    Me? After 3 years I was encouraged to quit. Essentially, I was outsourced :) But it was well worth my time.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  63. Re:or maybe apple sucks by mpathetiq · · Score: 2, Funny

    Liam only browses Slashdot at +5. My comments will go unnoticed.

    That premise is just ridiculous. Liam Gallagher reading Slashdot? Noel maybe...

  64. why our readers need to go back to college by Nimey · · Score: 5, Funny
    painstakenly

    Painstakingly.

    typo's

    Typos.

    I forgot about slashdot for about a year, came back just the other day.

    Insert "and" just before "came".

    I'm seeing hardly any intelligent comments

    Indeed.

    dissapearing up it's own asshole.

    1) That's disappearing.

    2) It-apostrophe-s is a contraction for "it is". "Its", on the other hand, is possessive. Counterintuitive, but that's English for you.

    So to recap, you should have written "disappearing up its own asshole.". Have a nice day.
    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:why our readers need to go back to college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it is not "literally" disappearing up its own asshole anyway. Slashdot does not even *literally* have an asshole.

    2. Re:why our readers need to go back to college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I forgot about slashdot for about a year, came back just the other day.
      Insert "and" just before "came".
      Inserting "and" alone won't fix it. "[C]ame back just the other day" is not a complete sentence. Either insert "and I" just before "came" or remove the comma when inserting "and" just before "came."
    3. Re:why our readers need to go back to college by jozmala · · Score: 1

      I think there is a REAL ASSHOLE in slashdot, his name is Anonymous Coward. He generates huge amounts of bad or uninformative posts, and trolls quite a lot.

      --
      ©God :Copyright is exclusive right for creator to determine the use of his creation.
    4. Re:why our readers need to go back to college by samanta · · Score: 1

      Great discovery, dude! This merits a place in 'Finding of the Year' ;)

    5. Re:why our readers need to go back to college by Chris+Chiasson · · Score: 1

      should that be: its'

    6. Re:why our readers need to go back to college by Nimey · · Score: 1
      should that be: its'


      1) No.

      2) Questions end with "?". You know, that funny-looking character just to the left of your right-hand shift key. You have to hold down shift to get it.

      3) Sentences must be ended with one (and only one) of the following punctuation: "." (period) "?" (question mark), or "!" (exclamation point). End a declaration with a period. End a question with a question mark. End a sentence meant to convey excitement with an exclamation point.

      4) Sentences must begin with capital letters. Use your shift key again. The only exception I'm aware of is with the name of a Unix command, e.g. "ls will list the files in the current directory.". That's a very unofficial exception.

      5) Yes, I would like fries with that.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:why our readers need to go back to college by Chris+Chiasson · · Score: 1

      i looked it up on a few websites you're right; its is correct i could swear i learned to use its' in school all my life...

    8. Re:why our readers need to go back to college by Chris+Chiasson · · Score: 1

      it would be nice if slashdot autoconverted my newline characters, but i guess that's too much trouble

  65. Getting bigger, eh? by insanarchist · · Score: 1

    Soon they'll build an India so big, it will DESTROY THEM ALL!

  66. living wage? by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How much is a living wage? Is it different if I'm single and live with 3 roommates? How about if I have 12 children (6 with "special needs")?

    Should I expect to have to provide my employer with more work (or more valuable work) for the higher "living wage" I need for my family situation?

    Because I thought I was supposed to get a "working wage" -- based on the value of my work.

    1. Re:living wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because I thought I was supposed to get a "working wage" -- based on the value of my work.
      Question is, what do you tell someone who's "working wage" is too low to pay for food? Commit suicide for being worthless?
    2. Re:living wage? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      Enough to buy good food and housing, pay for healthcare when needed. Manage small personal disasters, and save money for a time when you can't physically work anymore. And finally enough that the stress from working doesn't negate the benefits of a healthy lifestyle.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    3. Re:living wage? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Cut the job I suppose. Which of course might leave the guys with those jobs completely destitute ... or perhaps only half that number, with the rest being paid enough to actually improve not only their lives, but possibly their society on the whole. A rising tide may not lift all boats, but it's better than draining the damn lake.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    4. Re:living wage? by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Get another job? Move into a different field?

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    5. Re:living wage? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Enough to buy good food and housing, pay for healthcare when needed.

      For all 12 of my children?

    6. Re:living wage? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      Sadly, yes. Now, an intelligent society wouldn't have let you have more than 2 (enough to sustain the population), and wouldn't let you have those unless you could support them.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    7. Re:living wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many countries, when a parent can't pay to feed his children they become wards of the state. Then the people who can afford to pay taxes pay to feed his children. It's a win-win: the kids don't die of starvation and the poor sap stops being a parent.

    8. Re:living wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should I expect to have to provide my employer with more work (or more valuable work) for the higher "living wage" I need for my family situation?

      Should your employer have to pay you more to support your choice to have 12 children?

  67. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by rpjs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The UK's second largest electricity distribution company, PowerGen, has just announced that it's closing its Indian call-centres and bring the jobs back to the UK due to poor customer service issues.

  68. Kleptocractys have very poor growth numbers. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Look at Zimbabwee, it's pitifull. Does'nt have enough trained technical staff to draw anybody.

    Your arguement does'nt work. Supply one counterexample.

    Even in the case of unskilled labor the worst kleptocracys are not drawing much investment (investment is pulled out as fast a feasable). Look at what happens when they steal the foreign investment via nationalizations. (typically they lose the industry just nationalized due to lack of capital to keep it running.)

    Preemptive counterarguement: No the USA is not a kleptocracy. Most built in thievery in the 'first' word is via taxation and payout to the choosen (e.g. in the USA Haliburton, the NEA, government employees). As our taxes are lower and 'couch sitting, check cashing' classes less entrenched the USA has most of europe beat on this test (the exception being Ireland, the low tax, rapid growth center of europe).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Kleptocractys have very poor growth numbers. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It hasn't happened yet, but that's because companies having wisend up yet. They're still running on the treadmill of chasing the cheapest source of skilled labor around. Of course finding skilled labor in those countries is nearly impossible, so companies will have to work more at training their workforce, but since they're basically slave labor anyway this isn't such a big deal.

      Another way to think of it is that Outsourcing is sort of like Foreign Aid on a large and sustainable scale. As you dump Foreign Aid into countries, assuming the aid actually gets into the hands of the people who need it, they tend to be better off than they were beforehand. The only way to prevent Foreign Aid from increasing the quality of life of its citizens is to make sure the Government steals it all before it can do any good.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  69. Re:elsewhere IBM is coined as Indian Business Mach by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    6 billion over 3 years isn't really all that much, but it is a good start. IBM has made plenty of mistakes in its past *cough* Microsoft *cough* and even more recently have done some questionable things. This could very well turn out to be another folly of theirs. They are slow to move, and slow to correct. The fact that I'm already seeing companies in the U.S. bypassing India and outsourcing to China says something. Don't ever underestimate the greed present in the States. If a company can save even just a few cents by setting up shop somewhere else (i.e. China), then they'll do it in a heart beat. On the flip side, I'm also notcing a trend of American companies setting up shop in more rural areas of America, where cost of living is cheaper. From this side of the ocean, it appears everyone is looking for alternatives already.
    Regards,
    Steve

  70. And yet they're still stuck with the caste system by bunions · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, people give China all kinds of shit (rightfully so) for human rights violations, but no one raises a peep about the Indian caste system.

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  71. 2003 BBC interview with Vivek Paul predicting this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  72. Re: Western Hypocrisy by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If China respected foreign investors' money sufficiently, we wouldn't be censuring China either.

    India is the "largest democracy in the world" but if there is social justice there, then I'm CowboyNeal and I have a date tonight.

    Capitalism wants cheap labour and Western Politics is the art of smooth-talking mostly ignorant NIMBY voters. Western leaders don't have the guts to stand for and live by principles and the truth is that most of the people in the West don't have the guts either.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  73. Look to Pakistan by bacterial_pus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Their IT industry is in it's infancy, labor is cheap and it's producing some quality engineers. Not to mention infrastructure in big urban cities is almost the same as India's

    1. Re:Look to Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The govt of Pakistan compared to India is far too unstable for most companies to fork over hundreds of millions of dollars of capital.

    2. Re:Look to Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And not to mention, you can get some *GREAT* deals on black-market nuclear technology. I can see it now:
      • iReactor Pro: For high-energy professionals who need that extra bit of power and performance, all in a portable, sleek anodized aluminum case.
      • iReactor Mini: Perfect for home theater use, and for any home user who wants power and performance in a small, attractive, quiet package.
      • iPod "Never Charge" Special Edition: Nuclear Holocaust never sounded so good! With a built-in fusion reactor, you'll rock until Judgement Day! $299 for a 30-Kiloton Yield, $399 for 60 Kilotons. (Available in two colors: Mushroom Cloud and Nuclear Winter.)
      (I kid, I kid.)
    3. Re:Look to Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lets see the american govt letting any company outsource to a country which knowingly harbours terrorists,has terrorist camps and sponsors them!.that is one thing that'll never happen.especially after 9/11,americans have not fallen in love with muslims.hell,any guy with a beard is a potential target,many sikhs(not related to muslims in any way)were assaulted because their religion had them wear turbans and grow beards.

  74. Good! Another outsource to India bites the dust by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    Hey I left Welchs (the grape company) when I got wind that they wanted to outsource IT to India. All I have to do is say that don't train the outsourcing personel. Look for a new job and put off the "trainig" and "documentation" as long as you can. If we all stick to this, no matter what country we are from, we will make outsourcing fail. The last I heard from friends that are
    riding it out said that it's taking 5 outsourced employess to do my job, and the turn around is very slow. HA! Good!
    All of us need to stick together on this. Don't stay and hang around for a severance package, post your resume on Monster or
    whatever job search board you like and bail when you find the right job.

    Let's float outsourcing down the ganges (I think that's where the Indians send thier dead.)

  75. So it wasn't morals, it was ecomonics, figures by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    And here I was hoping that a multi-million dollar corporation actually make a decision based upon moral values. LOL

    Oh well, back to reality! =/

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  76. Re:And yet they're still stuck with the caste syst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
    That's because it's been illegal for atleast the last 50-100 years (right from when India was under British rule if I have my facts right). That said, it may (and probably is) still be "practiced" unofficially and illegally in social circles.

    That isn't saying anything much about the society. Racism has been "illegal" in the US for about the same time now, but if you think it doesn't exist in the society, then you're probably blind or white (or both). (Cue KKK, discrimination lawsuits, etc).

  77. Re:And yet they're still stuck with the caste syst by nick1000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just shows, how lack of proper details about a situation can manifest itself into prejudice. Caste system in India is a non-entity in the way it used to be. The reserved castes (earlier called lower castes) now get active affirmative with as much as 70% of some colleges purely earmarked for them. Publicly distinguishing people based on caste can get you to jail
    The caste system does not violate human rights, and commenting on an issue without understanding it just makes people look asinine.

  78. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by drasfr · · Score: 1

    I can attest. I called American Express 2 months ago. First when I got connected I noticed the lag in the phone call... It is obvious the call is not in the US. Second the guy had an accent.

    the call went on fairly well I would say, except at the end he asked me if he could tell me and read me about a promotion offer they had. I said no, I had no interest in it (It was for a reward program). He insisted saying it would only take me 2 minutes. I keep on refusing and he became _really_ rude about it. I couldn't believe it...

    I also receive a lot of phone calls from recruiters. I would say that 1/3rd of them seem to be coming from India I am sure. First sign is again the lag in the call, _really_ bad phone quality, then someone over the phone with an accent starting invariably with "how are you doing today Sir?". Sometime it is to invite me to job fair, etc, when I refuse, often they get rude saying it will only take so little of my time. Often I am busy and I tell them I have to call them back. They insist very rudely on me giving them a time to call back. i tell them _I_ will call back and come up with plenty of excuses for me to not call back. At the end I always end these calls.

    The only thing I would have to say is that I mostly have had either bad or below average experiences in this. I hate when I am connected with a call-center in India. I hate the delay in the phone conversation, the poor quality of the phone call, and often the attitude the cust-rep have on the phone.

    Personally I would rather pay a little premium to have a great customer service, support, LOCAL in the us than dealing with this crap of outsourcing call-centers.

    I have to say, outsource all of this to rural America, do the call centers in the middle of nowhere. Local people will be very happy, it will bring some money to these areas, labor laws are mostly the same and I have noticed one important thing... People here are SO much nicer and agreable to talk to! It makes it much more of a pleasure to deal with.

  79. Simpsons by Galston · · Score: 1

    Thank you, come again.

  80. Re:And yet they're still stuck with the caste syst by bunions · · Score: 2, Informative

    the cover story of the Nat'l Geographic last year sometime disagreed with your assessment, detailing litanies of abuse from the burning of the house of an untouchable who drank from the wrong tap to throwing acid in the face of another for some social tresspass. Unfortunately, the whole article is unavailable online, but here's the teaser: http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0306/featu re1/

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  81. Cedar Rapids Europa by milatchi · · Score: 1

    We were going to buy a house in Des Moines Io, but the schools in Cedar Rapids Europa are so much better.

    --
    Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
  82. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by PaneerParantha · · Score: 2, Funny
    and clueless techs who have no idea what celcius is

    That would be surprising. In India the temperatures are given in celsius and if a tech doesn't know what it is, I would wonder if they are from India.

    As to your example:

    And of course, the USA's finest... *drumroll* being told that component cables would not increase the quality of picture on my PSX games

    Here is a similar example experienced in USA. I once went to the Radio Shack store in International Mall in Miami, FL and asked for a wireless keyboard. The salesman laughed at me in his loud voice for all the customers to hear and said that there was no such thing as a wireless keyboard.

    Clueless people exist everywhere.

  83. tech leapfrog by zogger · · Score: 3, Informative

    In a lot of the developing world, they are skipping conventional and expensive and now old-fashioned ast century tech infrastructure roll-out and going to the next generation tech, decentralised (and alternative energy, solar, etc) electric power and wireless networks instead of fixed wires. Here is an article on what India is doing to bring electricity to the 1/2 billion people that don't have it yet.

    http://www.dawn.com/2006/06/14/int6.htm

    And just because apple puled out doesn't mean any number of other tech giants aren't going in. Intel, IBM, MS, HP etc, etc are all dropping serious folding cash into India right now. Apple is one of the few that *aren't*. Apple has pulled some lame biz decisions in the past, this is probably one of them, IMO.

    1. Re:tech leapfrog by arivanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As far as generation the "hug the trees alternative energy" stuff is very nice for villages with minimal consumption in the middle of nowhere.

      It is not suitable for the real stuff. All big outsourcing shops in India are forced to have UPS capacity sufficient to handle all of their computer systems including desktops and not just portions of the datacenter like in the US or Europe. This amounts to be a parallel power grid. In most cases this hits the worst sour spot of power generation - mid-size from cold. That is phenomenally ineffective and costs a fortune, but they have no choice. All those hired hands have to keep on typing.

      As far as wireless networks are concerned they are once again utterly irrelevant to the outsourcing cost.

      The problem with outsourcing cost is network capacity into India which is oversubscribed and is only getting worse by the day. There is no way to alleviate this with "next gen wireless". The only thing to help here is new fiber around the gulf which noone is even thinking about putting in the ocean floor now.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:tech leapfrog by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      In a lot of the developing world, they are skipping conventional and expensive and now old-fashioned ast century tech infrastructure roll-out and going to the next generation tech, decentralised (and alternative energy, solar, etc) electric power and wireless networks instead of fixed wires. Here is an article on what India is doing to bring electricity to the 1/2 billion people that don't have it yet.

      While alternate energy sources such as solar and wind work well in decentralized areas such as the rural USA or small remote Indian villages, it's not nearly as effective as traditional sources for providing power within cities and skyscrapers. The amount of solar cells needed to run a few appliances or lights in a community used to doing without isn't much. In the city it's a matter of serving several thousand people with the same amound of wire needed to serve a couple hundred in a rural area. You're running lights far more often, many computers, phone equipment/exchanges, etc...

      The power demand of your average skyscraper exceeds what you'd get by layering it in solar cells, you aren't exactly going to be allowed to put wind turbines up, and you still haven't addressed the problem of how you're going to get power when there's a brownout at night or when the wind's calm.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  84. Re:or maybe apple sucks by Arker · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I bet you thought you were joking.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  85. SA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same thing is going to happen in South Africa as well, they are already "exploring" land rearrangements based totally on race. They will screw over their producers in favor of party toadies, just like they did in rhodesia/zimbabwe. And the crime problem there is out of control, completely. It will take a little longer than than it did in zim, but it'll happen.

  86. So which is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did Apple back out of India or are they thinking of backing out of India? The article title doesn't match the article.

  87. Price? or Quality? by drwho · · Score: 1

    I don't agree with some comments that Apple is concerned with the quality of labor as opposed to the cost. I don't have the facts in front of me to cite, but from talking to people who have worked in, lived in, and done business with both India and China, what I see is that the low cost of labor is the ONLY thing those countries have going for them. I talked to a fellow who did assembly line automation consulting, and he spoke of how horrible labor-intensive Chinese factories are. The labor there is only one fifth as efficient as the US, but one tenth the price. I didn't hear similar comparisons about India, but I did hear that, outside of the major cities, $5,000 a year (well, the equivalent in rupees) was a comfortable salary to raise a family on. The cities (Bombay, (Mumbai), specifically, weren't as expensive as the US but still much higher than rural areas and small cities.

    Evidently, what keeps some Indians in the United States is the much higher standard of living here in terms of public life and public infrastructure. That is to say, the roads are paved, the garbage is picked up, the police aren't completely corrupt, etc. Even though they could 'live like kings' if they took the dollars they made in the US and went back to India, they don't want to be around the filth and misery that is much of India. Again, I am heavily paraphrasing what I've heard, so take this with a lump of salt.

    And it's true that certain things cost much, much more in India. For instance, much computer equipment. Some people make a living just by buying stuff in the US and getting it through India customs avoiding tarriff. Another huge expense is the cost of Internet connections. I read something somewhere that the cost of a VOIP phone line/Internet connection in an Indian call center is higher than the cost of the worker answering the phone!

    Personally, if I were outsourcing from the US I'd seriously consider a country often overlooked - Germany! The quality of work, the work ethic, the infrastructure, and the education are all very high. Many, if not most, of the younger population of Germany speak English to some extent. A good portion of these are quite fluent. In Eastern Germany (meaning the former GDR), wages are low, real estate is really cheap, even in the cities, and the government has many incentives for businesses willing to employ a number of people (AMD is building another chip foundry is Dresden, Porsche and BMW have recently built factories in Leipzig). The disadvantage of Germany is that taxes are pretty high. But they're not as bad as some countries, and there's evidence that they at least won't be going up anytime soon.

    1. Re:Price? or Quality? by vidarh · · Score: 1
      The disadvantage of Germany is that taxes are pretty high

      That's only really an issue if you've got revenue coming in there - the cost of employing workers in Europe vs. US isn't that different unless your company doesn't have any good benefits package for their US employees. Benefits packages in Europe tends to be much cheaper, as private medical insurance etc. tend to be extremely cheap (since most of them are for a small set of additional services on top of the public health services, not for full coverage) and that difference generally make up for all or most of any tax differences.

    2. Re:Price? or Quality? by drwho · · Score: 1

      Well, that's good to know. I had done rough calculations of what taxes I'd pay in the US (in Massachusetts) vs. Ireland...and found out that Ireland was about the same in taxes...but of course they have national health care! I am pretty sure that the quality of health care in Ireland is less than in Boston (Boston has the best hospitals in the world. I am not just rooting for the local team here...it's an observation of many people around the world). I know Germany has higher taxes than Ireland (probably because Germany pays more into the EU than it gets back out. How much longer will Germany tolerate this?), but it's nice to know that the equation still balances out in favor of Germany.

      One of the other things I like about Germany is that violent crime is very low. This is something that Mexico, Phillipines, Ukraine can't even come close with. But there are still parts of the US that have less violent crime than parts of Germany (Vermont vs. Hamburg, for instance).

  88. Race to the bottom by microbox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In other words, let us exploit you, it's for your own good :-)>,

    This encourages governments to be efficient, but also creates a race to the bottom on standards. "Exploitation" is more complex than good/bad. Wealth is more than money. A lot of the "wealth" from "exploitation" comes for hiding real costs. Creating huge negative externalities which aren't measured and thus removed from the bottom line.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  89. Economies of Scale by supamari0 · · Score: 1

    Apple backed out of India for the same reason that some others have. It's not efficient to run small operations there. India has a cheap workforce there but it has a lot of other side issues that no one talks about. For example, if you want a chunk of land to build your office, not only do you have to buy it, but you'll probably have to bribe someone in the process. Same goes with water permits, operating licenses etc.. There are full time consultants who's jobs are to work out the bribery angle. Hell even the US government's consulates have admitted to paying bribes. This is standard practice in third world countries. The only way to make an efficient business is to employ thousands of workers which makes up for the briberies with low wages. Employing a small amount of workers won't make up the difference despite the lower wages. Operating in India has its headaches and can only be done in a large scale manner.

  90. there is no one who cant do a certain job by xot · · Score: 1

    In my opinion I dont think there is any country or a group of people that cannot do a certian job with the proper training and sufficient time.So if work is being outsourced to India or anywhere else for that matter, it can only be because of the cost.
    Anyone who thinks that people from one country can code better than people from another country are absolutely wrong and biased in their opinions.Yes, one group might take longer to adapt to the conditions or require more time to train but thats about it.I know its tough for anyone who loses his job because someone else will do it cheaper but thats the way all business's work! Don't they?

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  91. Re:or maybe apple sucks by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

    I never said Liam would actually read Slashdot. I'm not sure if Liam reads at all, but he has gotten in a few fights with people who didn't agree with him that Oasis is the greatest rock band EVER! Maybe Noel will tell him, or maybe one of the tech geek roadies will tell him, then one day , Liam will blind side you. He'll pin you to the ground and sissie slap you say "Oasis is the coolest." and "Liam is a god." You'll see. He's like that.

  92. You just can't train a slave worth shit. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    That's one of the reasons slave labor is'nt the norm.

    Bottom line, slaves require constant supervision just to keep them digging ditches. They are a bad economic proposition.

    Outsourcing is nothing like foreign aid. (which you correctly state helps noone but the kleptocrates.)

    All a nation needs to reproduce the India's economic growth is decent technical education. Hopefully someone in Africa will pay attention (but I would'nt bet on it).

    China is the key player. Watch their domestic economy, when it turns the corner to consumerism the whole world will shake from the economic fallout.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  93. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by sufijazz · · Score: 1

    Apple never had tech support personnel in India that you might have interacted with.

    And everyone I know has been frustrated with Tech support - regardless of where it's located. I've had to deal with Sprint customer service with weird accents (some Filipino, some Hispanic). An average Indian has a 'cleaner' accent than people from these countries. But what is interesting is that we have Americans who have emigrated from all these countries and so Americans may have an accent that is even more difficult to understand than Indians.

    Much of the anger against customer service professionals in general is diverted to Indian or foreign professionals in particular.

    --
    2+2=5 for very large values of 2.
  94. Re:And yet they're still stuck with the caste syst by vidarh · · Score: 3, Informative

    The difference is that in China it's the government doing the abuse, while in India the government has been fighting actively to get rid of the caste system.

  95. Re:elsewhere IBM is coined as Indian Business Mach by cpatil · · Score: 1

    6 billion over 3 years isn't really all that much
    $6 Billion * 46(Rs) = Rs27,600 crores. That's a hell lot of money in India. Check out any Indian company annual report and their expenditure is roughly 1/10th of Rs27,600 crores :) Why India will always remain a low cost IT outsourcing destination is because of this simple model.
    India produces not so quality grads every year, but in quantity for sure. These grads are desperately looking for jobs and don't mind slogging 12-15 hours a day on low wages, without any Insurance, 401K, etc. What Indian companies typically do is train these fresh grads and dump the work under supervision of few experienced engineers. This model will remain and continue. Trust me, India has so much population, economics works totally different here. Their is no threat to IT/Non-IT companies living on outsourcing model - Indian, Chinese or Russian, doesn't matter.

  96. Re:elsewhere IBM is coined as Indian Business Mach by vidarh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You miss the key difference between IBM and Apple:

    IBM is largely a services company, always has been, and even more so now after the sale of their PC division. The vast majority of their staff are consultants for hire. For IBM it makes sense to invest in India because the Indian market for consultants is booming both because of the outsourcing craze, but also because the Indian economy is booming and homegrown IT companies are getting to the size where they're becoming a large potential market for IBM. To service that market, IBM needs local resources. Establishing research centers is vital, because it allows IBM to grow and retain staff that would be hard to keep in a pure consultancy play.

    For Apple, on the other hand, there are few benefits to hiring people in India, as their primary revenue source is hardware/software and consumer products/services (like iTunes), none of which require a large presence on the ground in the local markets.

  97. Re:Well hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What a retarded non-sequitor post.
    What a retarded way to spell "non-sequitur".

    It's not even Apple making the excuses.
    They don't need to, at least for a phanboi like you who totally sucks Steve Jobs cock.
  98. OMG by trintron · · Score: 1

    No more cheap labor! Next please..

  99. Re:Just Pay it Forward to Employees & Companie by vidarh · · Score: 1
    HR needs to weed out people who have made these kinds of moves too much in favour of people with long term business relationships with their employers

    In that case, given the growth in India at the moment, your HR team will not find suitable staff as people will simply look elsewhere. If you want to keep staff in India, you will have to expect to offer frequent salary reviews, and make very sure you know exactly what your staff is worth in the local economy.

    That is where a lot of companies - they have to realise that good employees is an asset that rapidly increases in cost in most market, and particularly in a market where his/her skills are in short supply, and if they don't ensure they adjust the salary accordingly, they will loose staff.

    Why should any employee feel loyalty to an employee that undervalues them by paying less than the going rate?

    In the end it's a matter of deciding what is most important: To retain staff or to keep salaries low. High turnover has a high cost (recruitment and training is expensive), so it's a matter of striking a balance. If staff can find jobs elsewhere at a significantly higher pay than what you paid them, then you have to ask yourself why, and seriously question if the reason is that you don't know how to properly assess the value of your employees.

  100. you are behind the times by zogger · · Score: 1

    Really, no offense but you are woefully ignorant of the status of "alternative energy". It works, going in all over, at 10 watt to the multi mega watt levels. Wind power is not almost equal to the cost of coal generated electricity. solar is still higher, but if all you have is a hut sitting out in the hot sun...you think it's cheaper to put in conventional? really? Isn't that part of the article I linked, conventional costs *more* in a lot of cases?

        The last place we lived as caretakers was fully solar PV powered, the main owners house at 7,000 square feet and our rig. They ran full upscale upper middle class fully electric everything from it, and total cost including labor for install was around what a reasonable car costs today, which compared to the cost of the house was a few percent. The cost could have been dropped a lot with homeowner sweat equity in the install, and that is US full "what the market will bear" cost on hardware and labor.

      There are wind generators out there now putting out more than two megawatts, and home owner sized wind rigs are in the multi kilowatt range now and solar you can get any size you want. I know I lacked for nothing, full desktop computers, etc, refrigerator,freezer,run the washing machine, etc, all normal stuff. When the entire rest of the local area went down for a *week* from an ice storm we missed absolutely nothing, zero, didn't even know the grid power was down until I saw the local street lights in the distance wern't on. I mean..can't beat it with two sticks. it's clean power, too, better than grid supplied.

    While you are doubting, others are doing, run some google searches and get up to speed on the subject. There are new factories going in all over the planet to expand production of solar PV (because it is selling like crazy because it "just works") and every doubling of manufacturing output is dropping the price 20% (economy of scale). There are new concentrator PV panels coming to market soon and a plethora of new battery tech.

    And as to "UPS", well dang vern that is a primary part of alternate energy rigs, having your own battery bank and smart chargers and inverters, all that is a big UPS system that is modular and has some solar PV or wind charger hooked to it.

    1. Re:you are behind the times by arivanov · · Score: 1
      Really, no offense but you are woefully ignorant of the status of "alternative energy".

      I do not doubt it works. For different applications. Not for this one. You misunderstand the application.

      The application is to supply power to office space + datacenters + labs instead of the grid connection during blackouts and brownouts for 20%+ a day (that is the current situation) regardless of sun, monsoon wind, etc. 365 days a year. The reason for having the system is that the grid is failing in the first place. So you cannot fall back to the grid the way all green systems do when the weather is adverse (no sun, no wind, strong wind, etc).

      While some augmentation with solar or wind is feasible, end of the day it ends up being a generator and big banks of batteries which provide power until it warms up. There is no other way unless you own your own accumulating hydroelectric to store the "green" energy until it is needed. AFAIK none of the tech companies in India does. In fact even if they had the money I am not sure that they could do it for regulatory reasons. For all its globalisation, key parts of Indian economy are still strictly regulated and competition is inexistent.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:you are behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not=now

      meh, had someone honking a car horn outside and mashed submit

    3. Re:you are behind the times by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Really, no offense but you are woefully ignorant of the status of "alternative energy". It works, going in all over, at 10 watt to the multi mega watt levels.

      Sure, as long as you have enough real estate available to be covered in solar cells or wind turbines. We're talking about cities here, where space is at a premium.

      Wind power is not almost equal to the cost of coal generated electricity.

      Like the Indian government is likely to allow you to do something so unsafe as putting a wind turbine up over the heads of thousands of people. It'd be something for the Indian power companies to do, not the companies running the programming/helpdesk centers.

      solar is still higher, but if all you have is a hut sitting out in the hot sun

      We're not talking about huts in the hot sun, we're talking about skyscrapers and other large building stuffed full of people and computers. Power demands are completely different levels of magnitude between the two.

      The last place we lived as caretakers was fully solar PV powered, the main owners house at 7,000 square feet and our rig. They ran full upscale upper middle class fully electric everything from it, and total cost including labor for install was around what a reasonable car costs today, which compared to the cost of the house was a few percent. The cost could have been dropped a lot with homeowner sweat equity in the install, and that is US full "what the market will bear" cost on hardware and labor.

      As long as your 'reasonable car' is $30,000 I guess. In my area that'd be roughly 30% of the cost of the house, not a 'few percent'. Also, 7k feet is three times the size of the average home, and 'upscale upper middle class' equipment tends to be fairly power efficient. Meanwhile, I pay $40 a month for all my power demands from the utility, and I run a small server farm. If they'd be paying $60 a month for power, it'd take 42 years for the investment to pay back, assuming no interest or repair/maintenance costs. 25 years if the system replaced a $100/month bill.

      it's clean power, too, better than grid supplied.

      I, like most corporations, rate my power 'cleanness' upon how pure the sine wave is, not it's source. While I'd prefer to see the coal plants shut down, I'm far too fond of nuclear to make greenies happy.

      And as to "UPS", well dang vern that is a primary part of alternate energy rigs, having your own battery bank and smart chargers and inverters, all that is a big UPS system that is modular and has some solar PV or wind charger hooked to it.

      12 hours of batteries for your average data/call center would be insanely expensive, and it's a cost you'd have to pay every five to ten years at least.

      Note: I've looked at wind/solar for my place, but it hasn't reached the point that I'd buy it yet.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    4. Re:you are behind the times by zogger · · Score: 1

      by clean power that is exactly what I meant, well regulated power, good for the electronics.

      no law says data centers have to be placed in the middle of expensive high rise towers in large cities, in fact, some of the larger ones being built right now are going out in the sticks in dedicated buildings, the new googleplex, etc. It's nuts to cry poverty when you insist on the highest rent. If your center is large enough, you can get the lines to it.

      Again, not sure what you are saying, that alternatve energy doesn't work or it doesn't scale up? Are you calling over 2 megawatt apiece wind turbines non-large scale? You need more than that? One megawatt towers are common now and the larger ones are going in, and they frequently go in as "farms" with dozens of the towers in one place, some of them able to handle all the electrical needs of entire decent sized cities. I would call that large scale, guess you won't or don't..to each their own. Here's one just lately, in LA, a new wind project will be furnishing one fifth the total power needs there..but I guess that isn't significant, huh? As to "enough real estate", well, you slap them in right outside the big cities, they are doing it all over.

      http://www.gepower.com/about/press/en/2006_press/0 60506b.htm

      And like I said, solar is going in all over as well, and is neat because so many people can take advantage of it and it scales like crazy. It's happening, whether you like it or not, seems *millions and millions* of people are going to it all over the planet, most all the dealers are backlogged with orders and installs. And some of the larger investors in alternative energy are now nations that are dependent on foreign source of energy and see the alternatives as long range cost effective, so they are directly investing with public money and/or offering subsidies to private corporations to help speed up adoption. Examples there are Japan, China, Germany, India..but what do they know, eh? Even stodgy old oil soaked usa is doing it....

      As to solar not being cost effective, or quoting some "payback" period,which is a huge variable, here's a challenge I have yet to have any internet alternative energy debunker "expert" meet, so here's *your* chance: write back when you can point to your personal grid electric supplier for your house (I need a URL to look at it where they offer this) that you use or could use in your area, that will give you a ten or twenty year guaranteed priceing contract, so much a kilowatt hour carved in stone. There's your challenge. Non corporate, joe homeowner normal "electric bill". With the alternatives you can purchase and own, with a ten to thirty year warranty, this is a verifiable figure you can get a firm price on *today*.

      When you can provide that, you have a point and can start throwing around figures for comparison, without it, it is pure guesswork with no data to back it up on what a so-called "payback" period is. You can *guess* based on your current rates, that's about it. something weird could happen tomorrow to the energy markets, poo, vast price rises. I've seen it happen, particularly during OPEC embargo. Or perhaps another california enron price manipulation scam..you never know. If the stuff you own is installed at home..well there ya go, it's there. It's not perfect-nothing is, but it gets closer to this ownership deal which most folks think is a good idea, like payoff the house, payoff the car, payoff the furniture, etc, not "rent" forever. Myself being a geek and always wanting power, I long ago aquired and paid of a modest solar rig, and it's still running fine. It doesn't do all my power-yet-but eventually it will and in the meantime even if the grid goes kerflooey for some reason I have an immediate "good enough" amount of power to run some critical things around the old abode here. I got less into it then a lot of people have in their big screen TVs and home "entertainmnet" c

    5. Re:you are behind the times by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      no law says data centers have to be placed in the middle of expensive high rise towers in large cities, in fact, some of the larger ones being built right now are going out in the sticks in dedicated buildings, the new googleplex, etc. It's nuts to cry poverty when you insist on the highest rent. If your center is large enough, you can get the lines to it.

      Except that the cities are where the infrastructure and educated workers are in India. You can do this in america because we've distributed our education and infrastructure enough that you can get most of the same services in some pretty rural areas as you can in the cities. Overnight UPS and Fedex isn't that expensive in business terms. That's why if you look at some of my other posts I advocate things generally called 'farm sourcing/ruralsourcing'. It's relocating to somewhere less expensive within the united states, generally in the midwest.

      Again, not sure what you are saying, that alternatve energy doesn't work or it doesn't scale up?

      I didn't ever say that. What I was trying to say is that my call center/data center isn't in the power production business. I'd rather pay the power company to deal with all that. That way that I don't have to worry about maintaining multiple power sources, huge banks of batteries, etc.

      As to "enough real estate", well, you slap them in right outside the big cities, they are doing it all over.

      Again, that's the providence of the power company, not the business center of whatever flaver. I was saying that a center in a city won't have the territory available to run their own wind farm, and likely doesn't have enough surface area for a large enough solar array to be independent of the grid.

      And like I said, solar is going in all over as well, and is neat because so many people can take advantage of it and it scales like crazy. It's happening, whether you like it or not, seems *millions and millions* of people are going to it all over the planet, most all the dealers are backlogged with orders and installs.

      Great for them! Living in ND, it's going to be a while before I bother, but I'm all for solar power being a suppliment. If nothing else, it provides it's peak power when power demands are at their highest when people have their AC on. What I say is that when you add in the power storage systems/batteries it becomes a whole lot less economical. Wind suffers the same problem in that you don't always have wind, resulting in the power company needing backup power sources when the wind isn't blowing. Add in that the most common backup power source is natural gas turbine, which has the highest fuel costs going, it doesn't necessarily make the cut. Yes, it's improving. I'm all for that. What I'm saying is that it's not yet a simple drop in solution for a high demand electric consumer that also demands high reliability.

      s to solar not being cost effective, or quoting some "payback" period,which is a huge variable

      No, it's not really. It's simple math, sure there's a number of variables, but they're fairly easy to calculate. I haven't even touched upon cost of capital, anticipated maintenance costs and such. Let's say a solar system for me costs 10k. If I invested that money instead of putting it into a solar system, at a conservative 5% I'd be able to pay $41 per month to the electric company forever from the interest. If I borrowed money at the low low interest rate of 5% I'd be paying more on interest than the system saves me.

      Here's a challenge I have yet to have any internet alternative energy debunker "expert" meet, so here's *your* chance: write back when you can point to your personal grid electric supplier for your house (I need a URL to look at it where they offer this) that you use or could use in your area, that will give you a ten or twenty year guaranteed priceing contract, so much a kilowatt hour carved in stone.

      Your challange is bunk. Here's why: While energy prices do flu

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    6. Re:you are behind the times by zogger · · Score: 1

      nukes just keep the concentrated money in the hands of the already bilionaires, and there has yet to be released a *true* satudy of what an end to end cost of building and running a nuke really costs. As it is now, without costing in factors like decommissioning and armed guards 24/7 for the next millenia, they are *barely* more cost effective than coal, even coal plants with scrubbers, etc. Nukes were pushed as a stealth military budget in order to get weapons grade stuff, they have never been all that good a deal. they make"hot", that's it, just "hot", and we have a ton of other places to get "hot". Hecks windchimes man it is right now this second 99 F where I am and it ain't technically summer yet.

      As to adding your name to a list or whatever, again, demand pushes the investors, larger scale means economies of scale in manufacturing costs. As to whether mine is paid off or not, hell ya! The first time the grid went down and I kept power I considered it paid off from the sheer convenience factor, as in running my propane furance fan in january when it was pretty cold and nasty out, the grid goes down frequently around here right when you really want to *keep* power, like ice storms or thunderstorms, etc. Can you put a price on that, or way down south when a big storm hits and the heat is actually at the critical point for a lot of people? Just being able to run some fans and see the news and weather on the TV and maybe pull some well water out is a huge bonus IMO.

      I not only have grid, and solar(yes I do all my own work and all my stuff was new), but I also own two different fuel generators and a small wind turbine, I want *guaranteed* electric, I require my radios and computers and water well and some lights to function at a minimum, and that means not relying on one source. I also have a year and half worth of "stored solar"-firewood, and a years worth of propane, at all times. I backup my data like most doodz here, have redundant computers, store food and water(enough to carry me much further than most people), have the ability to produce all my food if I had to, have a medkit the rival of most third world local hospitals, grow a ton of my own food already, have a greenhouse for year round production, and etc. I obviously don't live in the city (although I did for 15 years, Atlanta,you can have it, benefits are no way in hell comparable to the detriments and expense of urban living, IMO, it is too expensive, too crime ridden, too filthy, too loud..just too, too much. The money wasn't worth it to me so I moved. Wish I had done it sooner.)

      And because of these reasons, I *don't trust* the government or big business to have my welfare and well-being in mind when they are "deciding" issues. I don't trust "the deciders" anymore. I know I can't compete with the entrenched multibillion dollar transnational corporations, so I work around them the best I can, and I think in the future a wiseman will do similar, because if you don't, you are basing (betting, you are actually gambling) 100% (nearly) of your life health and welfare in politicians and billionaires hands.

      You really trust them bozos? Notice the wonderful katrina response? Notice all the wonderful corporate scandals that still go on year after decade after generation? I am old enough to have listened to them "live" saying "they will clean up washington!" and "clean up corporate scandals that rip people off!" and assorted BS for going on near half a century now, I think that is more than enough time to keep falling for that "trust them" part. My immediate relatives, the previous generation, my folks and grandparents, lost BIGTIME in the last great depression when the government and big business ripped them off by getting them to believe their long term lies. They pull something like this every other generation or two, I call it the big lie and big con, and you'll see it happen again. Yes you will and probably soon, too. Want an example of how this works, when you can see it start to unravel? Right now delta is trying to weasel o

    7. Re:you are behind the times by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      nukes just keep the concentrated money in the hands of the already bilionaires, and there has yet to be released a *true* satudy of what an end to end cost of building and running a nuke really costs.

      That's odd, I'm part owner of a number of power plants, nuclear and otherwise. My salary is only around 36k a year, though I can and do get thosands extra many years. I've been investing a good chunk of my salary and making good money on my investments. I'm looking forward to retiring early.

      As it is now, without costing in factors like decommissioning and armed guards 24/7 for the next millenia, they are *barely* more cost effective than coal, even coal plants with scrubbers, etc. Nukes were pushed as a stealth military budget in order to get weapons grade stuff, they have never been all that good a deal. they make"hot", that's it, just "hot", and we have a ton of other places to get "hot". Hecks windchimes man it is right now this second 99 F where I am and it ain't technically summer yet.

      1. Decommissioning: Nuke plants are lasting far longer than we anticipated, so the costs are really not that big of a deal. Yucca mountain is a political boondoggle that as far as I'm concerned we don't even need. I'd be building breeders that would actually help with our 'waste' issue because if we'd build a fuel all the 'waste' currently sitting around could be termed 'fuel' again. I don't want to have to use enriched stuff, I'd even like to be able to burn DU in them.
      2. Beating coal: Given how worried we are about CO2 emmisions, I see coal becoming even more expensive, and coal/nuclear are neck and neck for cheapest. Nuclear doesn't spew pollution all over the place, so I like it.
      3. 99F Temperatures don't mean much if you don't have a heat differential to exploit. If everything around is 900F it still wouldn't matter because you can't extract usable energy without a heat differential somewhere.

      As to adding your name to a list or whatever, again, demand pushes the investors, larger scale means economies of scale in manufacturing costs. As to whether mine is paid off or not, hell ya! The first time the grid went down and I kept power I considered it paid off from the sheer convenience factor, as in running my propane furance fan in january when it was pretty cold and nasty out, the grid goes down frequently around here right when you really want to *keep* power, like ice storms or thunderstorms, etc. Can you put a price on that, or way down south when a big storm hits and the heat is actually at the critical point for a lot of people? Just being able to run some fans and see the news and weather on the TV and maybe pull some well water out is a huge bonus IMO.

      Ok, you're rural. Good for you. I plan on buying some property out in the middle of nowhere when I retire.

      Anyways, the needs of a rural person is different than a townie like me. I haven't had an outage lasting more than a few minutes in the four years I've been living in my current location. If you add up all the outages I've had in the last ten years it's still under two hours total. I can live without electricity for those periods of time, and while you might need all that stuff, I'd bet that you could, if necessary, live without them for at least a few days. Bundle up if it's cold out.

      I not only have grid, and solar(yes I do all my own work and all my stuff was new), but I also own two different fuel generators and a small wind turbine, I want *guaranteed* electric, I require my radios and computers and water well and some lights to function at a minimum, and that means not relying on one source. I also have a year and half worth of "stored solar"-firewood, and a years worth of propane, at all times. I backup my data like most doodz here, have redundant computers, store food and water(enough to carry me much further than most people), have the ability to produce all my food if I had to, have a medkit the rival of most third world local hospitals, grow a ton of my own foo

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  101. Re:or maybe apple sucks by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    Got copies already - they work eerily well.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  102. Re:And yet they're still stuck with the caste syst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The caste system does not violate human rights"

    Amnesty International seems to disagree with you on this issue:

    http://www.amnestyusa.org/regions/americas/documen t.do?id=ENGUSA2005100705001

    Abuses against dalits are numerous and take many different forms, they include (but are not limited to):
            * Socioeconomic discrimination
            * Beatings, slashings, and other forms of torture
            * Arson - the burning of dalit communities
            * Violence against women
                        o Rape, gang rape, and the parading of women through the streets naked
                                    + As a form of punishment
                                    + As the right of the upper-caste male
                                    + To punish or embarrass the woman's family
                        o Beating and torture of women
            * Summary execution, many times by burning alive
            * Bonded labor
            * Denial of rights, especially land rights
            * Police abuses against dalits, custodial abuse

    Exactly *how* does this NOT violate human rights?

  103. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

    You're lucky. My father wanted to buy a Dell comp. He got through to Malaysia. He knew the computer he wanted to buy but he didn't want to pay by credit card. He wanted to deposit the money into an account. This took one and a half months and twenty faxes. He can be a stubborn bastard sometimes.

    --
    I reserve the write to mangle english.
  104. These jobs aren't programming jobs, dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As has already been mentioned: the jobs in question are tech support, i.e. customer service, not programming or I.T.

    Please read before flaming.

  105. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by dfjghsk · · Score: 1

    I was just reading an article in the NYTimes about Dell.. for the first time (ever?) they grew slower the the PC market overall. They said one of the reasons was because the Indian tech support was so poor, it was hurting their reputation. So they will start moving tech support jobs back to America.. they said it will be a few years though.

    --
    Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
  106. Outsourcing is.. out? by rkaa · · Score: 1

    The Register ran a related story yesterday;
    http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2006/06/16/powerg en_call_centre/

    My own experience with a global callcenter, the one of Equant, offices in Britain, Egypt, India and some other more obscure asian location, is appalling:

    Problems that used to take under an hour to get resolve can now take up to 25 hours. They are passed around the globe/timezones, to people who can barely make themselves understandable. Just to end up at the original center again. Laughable. If it wasn't so darn critical to our own services: The center is the service phone of one of our main network providers to abroad.

    Once they even called the wrong contact phone in return, to our Infrastructure boss, in the middle of the night. He was sound asleep at the time, of course. When he woke up, he noticed there was an unanswered call from Egypt but never bothered to call back because assumed it was a freak call. A relative of some immigrant calling the wrong number or similar. Equant had initially promoted their service as one with a local (norwegian) call center, and with a scandinavian HQ in Sweden. "Now in your own language", ran the commercial. They later "forgot" to mention it all got outsourced. Ta daa.

    The latter blunder gave us a solid refund, btw. Our CEO took the first flight to England and set things straight. But I have a hunch expenses like that aren't worked in to the maths of outsouring cost "benefits" right from the start. I'm not very surprised the outsourcing fever is cooling down by now. It allways appeared rather overhyped to me.

  107. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

    Umm.... I was talking about the US, not India. I have no issues with India to be honest. The reps are friendly, helpful, and have about the same english ability as Americans in my experience. ;)

  108. But THAT is what we want! by BerntB · · Score: 1
    What is going to happen when we run out of poor economies to abuse .. ?
    There won't be any poor nations and the world's GNP will go up fast?


    Sounds like what the bleeding hearth leftists want, but implemented by the economist right wingers...

    what happens when we have to compete with these new and motivated economies directly?
    Since most countries will have a higher living standard, consider the worst case problem:

    If your country is mismanaged, you have to write code for half the pay of people living in better managed countries.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  109. Re:Steve Jobs knows why Indian isn't the place to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in india, we constantly had problems with flies hovering over our meals in restaurants. They were *everywhere*. One would eat with their right hand, and keep waving the left above the plate to keep the flies off. That's when I heard an expression that stuck with me: "Eat s*&^it, 200,000,000 flies can't be wrong."

  110. Outsourcing by Peyomp · · Score: 0

    I can hire Java guys Bangalore with 3-5 years of experience for $3K a month, and that includes facilities, a PC, network, etc. He may not be brilliant, but he is cheap. Cost of employment there is $36,000 a year. Cost of employment on his American equivalent would be well over $100,000 a year. Most every article I see on outsourcing skews these numbers horribly. Its as though they've never gotten an actual quote in researching their articles. You can hire graduates for $700 a month, if you've got an office. The problem with direct hiring is retaining people. A guy will leave you for $800 a month with zero notice.

    Apple's problems would be a little different as they were creating a call center. In my opinion, outsourcing call centers is a TERRIBLE idea. Culture matters in customer service, and giving a guy named Ganesh the name George and forbidding him from giving out his real name is hardly the equivalent of actual cross-cultural education.

    Call centers in India are for companies that don't give a shit about customer service. Development centers are not neccessarily this way. The fact that the Apple Service tech I talk to is intimately familiar with technology because he's been a computer dork since age 5 and that he is acclimated to the Western hemisphere matters in whether I recieve satisfactory customer service. Not that customer service for an IT company is a dream job, but in the states people have options and so this job attracts a certain type of person.

    A person that is well suited to the job. In India, where opportunity is limited and jobs affording entry to the middle class are not very diverse, this is not the case. If you're from the right city, and you can't become a doctor or a software engineer by getting a CS degree or any engineering degree and then becoming an indentured servant in exchange for training, you try to work at a call center. This being the case, odds are you are not suited to this work, and cultural barriers aside, will suck at it.

    It is ironic that 'high value' activities like software development can be successfully outsourced, but 'low value' activities like customer service cannot.

    In engineering, your American domain experts can act as quality assurance personnel, ensuring that code from Indian engineers who may not have a perfect grasp of the problem you're trying to solve never reaches the customer if it is not precisely what is required. Your American engineers will also be the source of creativity in creating novel solutions to business problems.

    Thats not to say that Indians are not creative. They are, and increasing R&D development on the subcontinent proves it. But if you are starting an Indian subsidiary or are outsourcing work to an outsourcing firm, your Indian engineers will lack sufficient domain expertise to be effectively creative until they are more experienced in your domain. Whats more, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai and New Dheli are such competitive markets that employee turnover rate is quite high, and so an investment of domain education is often lost when an employee moves on to the next job.

    So you've got to have a competent team of engineers stateside who can parcel work out effectively to your Indian engineers. And in order to retain them, you've got to make your Indian engineers feel that they have a future with your company. You've got to inspire them, to make them feel that they are part of something meaningful. You've got to sell them on your mantra. The work has to matter. This is easier said than done, as you are probably 10 or more timezones away. But the bottom line is, that to get the most value from outsourcing software development, you have to take an active role in managing your Indian subsidiary or contract employees.

    The culture in Bangalore in particular is one of distrust and deceit. Employees are used to being mistreated and lied to. Stock options are promised and then never materialize. Engineers work on substandard equipment. Management is completely cynical because of the turnover r

  111. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by MojoStan · · Score: 1
    Customer support from India can be quite good if the company puts in the proper resources (e.g. wages, training). For example, Dell's "premium" support (from India) for their high-end XPS line was given a rating of 9/10 in a HardOCP review. However, last time I heard, Dell's India-based support for their low-end products was poor quality.

    I suspect Apple did not expect the cost of "good" Indian customer support (by Apple's standards) to be so high. Outsourcing companies advertise their "cheap" costs (like Dell $299 PCs), but the good Indian support (like Dell XPS) costs considerably more.

    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  112. Re:Just Pay it Forward to Employees & Companie by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    I don't know if my experience here in Singapore is any measure, but I've been told by peers that I could easily get a salary that is 20% more than what I'm earning if I shift companies, something that my company (to which, truth be told, I don't quite have too much loyalty for, but that's a different story) says it can't promise as yet.

    Apparently, there are a lot of companies, mostly financial ones, moving in and are trying to establish a base here for the Asia-Pacific region, so there's a lot of sudden demand for technology-architects and such.

  113. your facts are not straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Affirmative action for lower castes and illegality of caste-based discrimination came from Gandhi, not the Brits. The Brits employed "divide & conquer" management techniques, to keep the castes and religions at a constant discord. The Indian constitution written after independence from Britain in 1947 was the first to formally abolish the caste system, and offer affirmative action (called "reservation" in Indian parlance) for the downtrodden castes.

  114. Sorry about my spelling... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Heh, I did better than you think, seeing as how that post wasn't run through any spell check or even any significant proofreading. Anything serious I run through spellcheck/somebody else. Slashdot doesn't qualify.

    It was a typo, I do that fairly frequently. I catch most of them, but one usually slips through.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Sorry about my spelling... by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      wow, someone actually owned up to it and didn't play it off as something like "Who cares, I am no't in skool or anythang." This and Bill Gates is stepping down to give away his money. 4 more signs until doomsday.

  115. It is even worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://sikhissues.blogspot.com/2006/01/al-qaeda-of -india-rss-vhp-bjp-orthodox.html
    I think America should NOT outsource to India till a comprehensive social security plan is implemented in India. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment_insuranc e
    Otherwise America is contributing to "race to the bottom" in India where 85% of people do not even have bank accounts. http://in.rediff.com/money/2005/dec/01guest3.htm

  116. Customer Service by eBayDoug · · Score: 0

    IMHO you are crazy to run customer service operations out of India.

    Ask yourself: When the customer gets on the phone and hears that Indian voice, are they happy or are they pissed? I would vote for pissed.

    Not a good start to your customer service call.

    Dell IBM AMEX SPRINT many others flying into the Philippines. In fact, many Indian call center companies are coming here too.

    Wages are going up, electricity and internet are expensive. At least the Filipino reps make their customers a little less mad than the Indian reps.

    --
    Learn About Outsourcing. http://www.pioutsource.com
  117. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Is it only me that gets frustrated when my calls are piped over to India?

    Don't worry, soon, both your calls and Indians' calls will be piped over to some english speaking african country. And if you can't stand african accents, don't worry, later on when outsourcing will be over due to the lack of interesting countries to outsource to, your calls will be pipped to good ole Alabama

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  118. Affordable Housing by equivocal · · Score: 1

    you could rent a carboard shack for $5/month, but nobody who can afford not to would.

    All these people giving speaches to planning commissions or writing letters to the editor crying about "affordable housing" fail to understand what truely makes housing affordable.

  119. Re:Why? Bad customer service I bet by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Hey, don't lump all of us Americans in with the people in the southeast. We don't all talk like that.