Slashdot Mirror


22,000 Indiana Students Using Linux Desktops

Anonymous writes "Indiana's Department of Education has moved 22,000 students onto Linux desktops, and it's looking like that's only going to accelerate with SLED 10, Linspire, and other distributions getting better."

74 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. In indiana... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now there is truly more than corn in Indiana!

    1. Re:In indiana... by Peyna · · Score: 3, Funny

      Soybeans?

      --
      What?
    2. Re:In indiana... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, there are kernels! Sorry, but the pun had to be made.

    3. Re:In indiana... by flumps · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he's talking about Microsofts COM and DCOM, and probably OPENGL and DirectX or something..

      .. but then there's Gnomes Bononbo for a COM layer and the directx alternative SDL, so I think hes just sounding off.

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    4. Re:In indiana... by Durrok · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a hoosier I can tell you that although there may be more then corn in Indiana it is the most exciting thing around.

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    5. Re:In indiana... by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "There is no standardize API's or installers."

      The core standard API is POSIX.
      The standard 3D graphics API is OpenGL.
      The standard 3D audio API is OpenAL.
      The standard 2D graphics API is SDL (which is a shame, because Allegro is much easier).
      The standard 2D GUI API is XLib (with higher level GUIs made from it).
      The standard packaging format is RPM.

      He's got a point on installers. While there are several installers, there is no common installer/uninstaller. This is where I think that all major distributions are failing horribly. It doesn't matter if the installer is apt, urpmi, up2date, or yum. All the major distributions need to pull their heads out of the asses, and get together to agree on a single installer.

      It didn't matter to me what package format was chosen as the standard, but RPM format (actually an RPM format subset) was chosen. All those Debian distributions are doing more harm than good by not adopting it. There are areas where diversity is good, such as the back-end implementation), and areas where diversity is not good (the presentation layer).

      The installer falls squarely in the presentation layer, with the package format arguably having a foot in both places: users will be looking for a specific type of distributable, so they should have to look for only one type. They shouldn't have to care about the container format (RPM or Deb).

    6. Re:In indiana... by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny
      What's wrong with:
      more README
      more INSTALL
      more INSTALL-LINUX
      more INSTALL-LINUX-FEDORA
      ./configure
      <crap>
      ./configure DIR=/usr/local
      make
      <crap>
      yum install Xaw3d-devel
      make
      make test
      make install
      <crap>
      su -
      make install
      <crap>
      cd ~Intron/Newapp-3.01.02.11/src
      make install
      exit
      piece of cake
      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    7. Re:In indiana... by backwardMechanic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The trouble is, RPM isn't very good. It doesn't hide the hard work from the user. I also use Gentoo, and love Portage. I don't need to know anything about dependencies to install a package, the computer works it out for me. It makes it stupidly easy. This seems like a good idea.

      All those different package managers are looking for the best solution. We haven't found it yet. Sure, we don't need the perfect answer, but I'm glad nobody stopped at RPMs.

  2. Terrorist targets? by Pete+Brubaker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, wait a second, isnt that the number of "terrorist targets" they claim to have?

    --
    What's a sig? Pete Brubaker
  3. thats nice by rhesuspieces00 · · Score: 3, Funny

    but does it run...

    oh wait, i guess it does.

  4. One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by RuBLed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I RTFA, I noticed that yes, they are using one flavor of Linux now but what worries me is that they're "planning" to use more flavors in the future, ranging from Ubuntu to Freespire. I don't have anything against it but if it is under the state grant program, it should try to standarize on one or two flavors of Linux. I think they're getting too excited on this and not thinking of the small consequences when 22000+ students are divided into 10 or more Linux flavors. Although they said those are "future" plans, I really would like to see them standarize. (or it is just me that wants them to use Ubuntu, hehe...)

    1. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It must be this new abstinence-only doctrine in action: install linux to deny students access to P2P pr0n.

      I am fine with that, but how are they going to be able to download viruses and gamez?

    2. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by Denial93 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The various flavors aren't that different from each other, especially in the areas that (should) matter to students. As long as they all run OOo and Firefox, are free of spyware and WoW clients, and can talk to each other, little more will be required. A heterogenous Linux environment isn't the end of the world, nor an administration nightmare. This has the same reason as the switch in the first place: the OS matters less and less. (Of course it'd be all different with proprietary business software or groupware, but these aren't needed here.)

    3. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by Skrynesaver · · Score: 5, Interesting
      when 22000+ students are divided into 10 or more Linux flavors.

      The article mentions SLED and RedHat. They also mention Ubuntu being used successfully by a different school district, I presume because of the edubuntu project. No sane admin is going to roll out 10 distros, "apt-get emerge rpm, Oh sod it install the bloody thing yourself!". However what's happening here is that different school districts are approving A distro for use on their systems, not some poor support tech trying to work out what distro is being used in a given instance.

      If my experience is anything to go by students who are introduced to linux early find Windows is broken if they are asked to move over. Employers of Indianna, prepare to be swamped with demands for cheaper OS installs in 6 years!!

      --
      "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    4. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by megaditto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      VMware??

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    5. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by sbrown123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A good quote in the article states that they don't bring up Linux or open source with the students but keep the focus on the cirriculum. Thats good, and makes Microsofts job really, really hard when they want to undo this. As for the different distros you will notice that they point out that these are being implemented at a school by school basis. But why should that matter? They are using the OS to just be an OS and thats about all. They probably just want it to run a web browser and Open Office. I live in Indiana, and have several friends who teach in the school system, so I know from talking to them that the hardware is dated and just keeping Microsoft Windows running is a fulltime job on its own (patching, removing kids "tweaks", spyware removal, etc).

    6. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by csubi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't think that would be of such a big problem - as soon as you get the hang of using any of the most popular distros, you're set to use most of the others (again, speaking about the popular ones like Fedora, Suse, Mandriva, Ubuntu, etc).
          I started with Mandrake 9.2, suffered like hell for a few months, two years later I use Ubuntu at work and Gentoo ~x86 a home.
          So as long as they see something else than Windows, it will be a largely beneficial experience, making them learn more!

          Idealism apart, one should still assure that the workstations deployed fulfill a few criteria:
            1. have functional local networking capacity
                    Samba works like charm
            2. network printing
                    CUPS
            3. don't be distro package format limited when installing software
                what I mean: I often had problems with Mandrake 9.2 in such regard that the compile toolchain was broken - the distro of choice sould give you the capacity to compile anything from source. In such case, the sysadmin is not tearing his hair out when tryong o install something that is not in the correct .rpm/.deb/whatever format.

          And why standardize the Linux distro to be deployed? Let the kids choose which distro suits them best.After all, all these distros aim at the same thing : be a capable and functional desktop OS

    7. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by online-shopper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're using two distributions, Linspire and SLED. And if you want them to standardize on one distro, best get used to the thought of it being SLED.

    8. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by ComputerizedYoga · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Let the kids choose which distro suits them best.

      The kids aren't going to have any say in what distro gets chosen (which is fine, in my opinion). But each district's IT department will certainly have that degree of autonomy.

      Incidentally, that's also the response to the fears of too many distros. It's not going to be the department of education (as in statewide) micromanaging things, doing OS installs and maintenance, etc. It's going to be the IT people in every individual district ... the people who've been trying to get by on freeware and the cheapest possible systems management solutions for ages.

      Districts need to train, hire/fire people for the required skillsets, and will probably also have time to work out a way to come into line with the state's policy. That'd be my expectation anyway.
    9. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by Chaffar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't have anything against it but if it is under the state grant program, it should try to standarize on one or two flavors of Linux

      Err, no. The "biodiversity" of Linux is one of its strong points, and one that is frequently brought up by supporters of OSS. If we start "standardizing", then all we are doing is replacing Windoze by 2 (or 3) different Linux distros. Better, but not the optimal solution.

      Of all people, students should be the first to learn how to cope with new OSes (or distros) as they arise, to build fundamental computer skills instead of learning through the click here to do this approach.

    10. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by alx5000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Although they said those are "future" plans, I really would like to see them standarize.
      The ones I would really like to see standarize are those developing distros. I got friends who regularly use ubuntu and still 'wtf' when you show them a fedora.
      --
      My 0.02 cents
    11. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by BoberFett · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And why standardize the Linux distro to be deployed? Let the kids choose which distro suits them best.After all, all these distros aim at the same thing : be a capable and functional desktop OS

      Apparently you missed the part where the student stated that he "Didn't care" whether it was Windows or not. Do you really think he's going to be concerned about which Linux distro is installed?
    12. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by csubi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry,

          It's true that I did not explain myself 100% clearly:
          The "let them choose" meant that kids might develop prefences toward using a certain distro if more than one present in the same classroom?
          And if ever such a thing would become apparent, it is logical to equip more PCs with the given distro.

    13. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by BoberFett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess I still don't understand. To most people, a computer is a tool. It's like a hammer. As long as it pounds in nails, it really doesn't matter if it's yellow, red, wood, plastic, it just doesn't make a difference.

      Those of us who inhabit nerd havens such as /. seem to lose sight of the fact that most people simply don't care about computers enough to develop preferences. As long as it performs the task they want to achieve, it doesn't matter what's under the hood, so to speak.

    14. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by FLOOBYDUST · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the largest drains on IT school budgets is the cost of licenses. From the article it appears they are focused not on "wow we use Linux" but we can put laptops in the hand of the students for substantially reduced cost. What needs to happen next is true integration of the laptop into the curriculum. I believe the algebra, geometry and calculus curriculum is ripe for improvement using laptops in the classroom to learn advanced concepts such as three dimensional coordinate systems , graphing, integration, integration etc. It is easier to understand if you can see it. The TI graphing calculators in use today are improvements on pen and pencil calculations but don't really represent a step change in the teaching methods. Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on viewpoint) the TI calculators have cool games which get alot of use during monotonous lectures. Has the teaching of advanced math changed at all in the last 50 years? Hopefully low cost laptops will inspire development of tools to bring about fundamental changes . The ultimate goal is to have the laptop and its underlying software transparent to the user. Any discussion of distros in the classroom defeats the purpose.

    15. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by clifyt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Err, no. The "biodiversity" of Linux is one of its strong points, and one that is frequently brought up by supporters of OSS."

      It is until you have to support it.

      I helped write / support a few packages that will be distributed for these students over the last few years. In the past, I could design a single install that worked for 99% of all the students. Now I have to worry about several installs. And whats on each? And will my software work on all of them?

      Case in point, a friend called me in to help her with a DOE application that was running under Java. Worked on Redhat, but not Linspire. Worked on Mac and PC. Didn't work under any of the other linux desktops. Just figuring out where the fonts are stored on each of these was a pain (we needed specialized math symbols installed...next version I've told her to just use bitmaps instead). And then all the other crap involved in writing up instructions for folks to run this stuff. Some desktops required admin access to get it in...others could run perfectly as an ordinary user (as all Unix apps should).

      Biodiversity is nice. Compatibility is another thing. Their is NO reason for a modern unix to decide I WANT THIS STUFF HERE BECAUSE I HAVE A PERSONAL PREFERENCE. I thought that was the idea of the whole Linux Standard Distribution -- or whatever they were calling it.

      All in all, until the Linux Desktop companies get their eff'n heads out of their asses, biodiversity is not a good thing. I don't care if they decide to tweak things differently or have different versions of installed software or different desktop management schemes so long as the applications work the same and an administrator that is reasonably trained on one can install software on another machine.

      "Of all people, students should be the first to learn how to cope with new OSes (or distros) as they arise, to build fundamental computer skills instead of learning through the click here to do this approach."

      I'm all fine with this -- just don't make it hard on the guys on the back end.

      Thats my rant for today...

    16. Re:One or two Linux "flavors" are not enough? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Students who have to 'see' the graph on a screen, rotating in three dimensions, are always going to struggle with the subject.

      It's better that they struggle and understand then never understand at all.

      I'm pretty good with math (3 semesters of college calculus so far - still having fun), but some of the stuff is just easier to see visually. In fact, a lot of time in my classes has been spent with the professor drawing really bad diagrams on a blackboard.

      The thing that's key about computer graphs is that you can vary the parameters and see the results immediately. "What happens if I make 'A' negitive?" Once you've experimented yourself and visually seen the result, you have a much better chance of remembering it later.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  5. Stigma by treak007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Using Linux in colleges provides two benefits. First, colleges can provide very powerful applications such as blender, bluefish, etc to college students without the cost involved. Secondly, if these students, after using Linux in college, begin to realize the stigmas about Linux are wrong, they are more likely to use the distributions on their own, if at least to run the software they are used to using, thus expanding the OSS community.

    --
    Klingon Software is not released, it escapes, inflicting terrible damage onto the enemy as it does
    1. Re:Stigma by Peyna · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The article is about high schools, not colleges.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Stigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's not a good argument. Why should every student in the college use Windows, just because some courses require Photoshop/AutoCAD?

      If the students require it, just run it using a terminal service.

      At my University I can just type "windows" at the Linux command prompt, and up pops a connection to a Windows server (Citrix based software I think). Then the colleges can also just pay licences per usage, so that they don't have to have multiple installations just in case someone needs it.

      For heavy use, perhaps VMWare is required, but the terminal experience is very fast for me at least. It can't compare with VNC etc.

    3. Re:Stigma by gripen40k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We use Linux at the U of Calgary engineering dept., and all it did was ADD to the stigma. Before I thought all the 31337 people used Linux to hax people and did generally c00l things with it. Then I grew up a bit and started using Linux only to realize that to do something so little like write a report just sucked (using OpenOffice), writing code sucked (using xemacs *barf*), and surfing the web sucked (using a restrictive, buggy, and old version of firefox). I'm not trying to dis Linux here (to it's credit we had gaim msnger, which I now use on my win comp at home :), I'm just saying that it seemed a bit anti-productive, and this is mostly due to crappy programs and the time spent trying to do *anything* was too great to really get into it. Of course I don't have the privileges to load my own programs, but damn, those high school students are really up against a wall if they are facing the same thing (most likely). Anyways, I'm going to try loading ubuntu on my lappy and see how that goes, also have a 'media center' version of knoppix that I should try on my hacked together media comp. I'm not giving up *yet* but I'm still skeptical...

      --
      Har?
  6. Yay, more to choose from... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fortunately, each of these students will now get to conceive their own linux distro as part of the curriculum.

  7. Can someone explain to me the Relevance by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can someone please explain to me the relevance of all these "Switch" stories. Maybe back a few years it would have been news but nowadays people are switching every day. Newsforge had a story a while back on why switching isn't news anymore. Maybe /. should take a hint from its sister site.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Can someone explain to me the Relevance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a state sponsored switch (in a very conservative state at that).

      Indiana is quietly attempting to become a leader in the Tech Industry in small steps taken by the government (instead of the populace).

      Our telecommunications bill was a step in the right direction.
      Bayh actively supports Net Neutrality (with Dick Lugar seeming to favor it, as well).
      State-sponsored research into improving the conditions for tech companies here in Indiana (and taking necessary steps to accomplish this).
      Governer Daniels voicing his desire for Indiana to move from manufacturing to tech; and expressing his wish to stop the 'brain drain'
      This recent OSS adoption

      Not all of it will pan out, of course. But, I applaud my state knowing that it is trying to move toward these goals. Amazing, considering how 'red' we are.

    2. Re:Can someone explain to me the Relevance by zalt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really? The only Linux users I've met has been extremely computer-savvy. To this day I've never (afaik) met a regular Joe (as in "Internet explorer? Ah, you mean the blue internet button!") who's using Linux at home or at work so I have to say stories like these are still news to me. Keeps the hope up you know.

      I don't know about the states but I have a feeling Linux is still just as a) unknown b) scaring c) looked at as a server OS to the general population as here in Sweden.

    3. Re:Can someone explain to me the Relevance by megaditto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How much are they going to save in licensing costs, does anyone know? (not just over Windows, but Office, Photoshop, etc.)

      And how much are they going to need to spend on training up the competent tech support?

      I remember MS claiming the TCO total cost of ownership is lower for Windows than for linux because of training...

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    4. Re:Can someone explain to me the Relevance by MISplice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well the techs involved in the install process are competent and actually come from school districts in Indiana. They are also the ones that are supporting the current environment. For the most part from what I understand it is almost like a cyber-cafe install where if something goes wrong ( Software wise ) they will have an image to just re-install the machine with the kids data on a network drive so they won't lose it. Who knows if this may change or not but if they get most of their schools on Linux it will be important for School Information systems (SIS) to start working in the platform as well because after the kids they may move over the teachers/faculty as well.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" -- Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Can someone explain to me the Relevance by LDoggg_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      How much are they going to save in licensing costs, does anyone know? (not just over Windows, but Office, Photoshop, etc.)

      A HUGE amount. Microsoft's "educational" discounts are laugable. I don't know the exact numbers for Indiana, but I have experience in setting up a large linux network for a school and the money we saved on software allowed us to purchase much better hardware. All of our workstations are now equiped with flat panel monitors.

      I remember MS claiming the TCO total cost of ownership is lower for Windows than for linux because of training...

      MS's claims are just marketing garbage.

      The school that I volunteer for has 2 ltsp servers and 60 thin clients. Since the thin clients have no hard drives, I never have to fix them. If there is a need for a new software package to be installed or account maintenance, I just remote into the server.
      Much easier solution for me personally than servicing 60 windows XP computers, regardless of how locked down they are.

      As far as training goes.. well, the first year I just made the system look like windows : screenshot
      As the year went on, I noticed that neither students(k-8) nor teachers had any problems using the web browser or open office in linux. I can't imagine spending much money on training, becuase the system was more than intuitive enough.
      As far as training for any new network administrators goes, sure. However in this day and age it would be silly for a network administrator to not put some effort into learning linux.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  8. Indiana by 8ball629 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After growing up and going to high school in Indiana, this is a surprise to me because our school was VERY outdated =S... of course this was a few years ago and it was in a town of about 7k people.

  9. Well... by Lord+Aurora · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If it's anything like my school, those 22,000 kids are actually using about 20 Linux desktops per school, in the "new" computer lab, while the other lab down the hall has 20 brand-new Macintoshes and the teachers are using networked Windows XP on those ubiquitous Dells.

    All that to say that 22,000 students using Linux probably translates into ~150 Linux desktops in the better funded schools.

    But maybe Indiana has a better public school system than California. Wouldn't be surprised.

    --
    The heavens do not fall for such a trifle.
    1. Re:Well... by davmoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't speak for all of Indiana, but I can speak for what I see in Bartholomew County, one of the richer counties in the state. Both of our public high schools have astroturf on their football fields. And both also have libraries that are woefully behind the times, with poor book collections that are held together with tape, and very little money to upgrade anything. If its for athletics, money can be found to do anything, and people will be fighting each other to be the first to donate. If its for academics, it takes a back seat and is ignored.

      Using Linux here might appeal from an older equipment standpoint, but computer labs are not a priority here in the first place.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    2. Re:Well... by Sol_Web_Dude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's pretty much that way all over the state. All around the Indy metro area, you see local news rags carry on about HS Football, Baseball, etc. Not much about academics.

      And the tax money spent on athletic programs, ug!

      I would like to hope that this is a step in the right direction.

  10. Common Installer? by NcF · · Score: 5, Funny
    "I think within five years, we'll see a huge market shift," Huffman said. "But the Linux community really has to come together. They do have to have a common API; they've got to have a common installer. If those things don't exist, it will not be a competitive market again. If they do exist, I think it will."


    ./configure && make && make install
    1. Re:Common Installer? by JonJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was also wondering about that, more specific: The API-part, what does he mean? Does he want a stable Linux-api? KDE? GNOME? X? OpenGL? From my point of view, it looks like he just hasn't completely understood what he's talking about. And common? They all share the Linux-kernels, and a lot of them uses the same graphical user interface(Red Hat, SUSE and Ubuntu have sort of standardized on GNOME)

      --
      -- Linux user #369862
  11. fitter, happier, more productive by elmartinos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I switched to Linux I have noticed an instant productivity gain. Not because it is better, more secure, faster or anything, but because of the lack of Counterstrike et al. This effect should not be underestimated, especially in schools.

    1. Re:fitter, happier, more productive by phalse+phace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know a lot of people who use Windows as their OS and they are very productive. Why? Because they are responsible and are able to manage their time. It has nothing to do with Linux. It's about getting your priorities in order.

    2. Re:fitter, happier, more productive by debiansid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess you haven't tried NetHack yet. It gets you really really hooked.

    3. Re:fitter, happier, more productive by junglee_iitk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know of you, but Linux is very "Counter" productive to me. When I am in Windows I play Quake or CS, get a headache soon and then try to do my work; unlike when I am in Linux, I try to do my work and end-up reading Slashdot and editing Wikipedia.

  12. Re:gotta get my eyes checked. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah I didn't see it right on first glance either. I saw "India" and "laptops". I thought for a second this was going to be about those $100 WiFi laptops where you turn the crank, actually. But I'm sure those of you from Indiana are familiar with your state getting confused with India, and vice versa.

  13. Solution by joshier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem that has been with linux always has been the popularity.

    The more users, the more development, the more programs, the more users, the more .. you get the picture.

    I'm very happy with this, and I don't mind what distribution they use.

  14. Unhappy with SLED 10 by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been running SUSE on my desktop at work since v8 and just tried the latest.
    Luckily I installed another harddisk in my pc before trying to install.
    It looked great but I ran into some installation problems very unlike other SUSE installs I have tried. Even on my notebook it has worked perfect, even WiFi and Bluetooth.

    Although the install itself ran fine. Getting the right drivers for my nVidia (6200) card failed. I got a trial key and went on to install the drivers in hope of running XGL. But it failed to make use of the card so I ended up installing my own drivers and forced XGL to enable. I did get that to run but then I had another problem, which was a show stopper.
    I was happy to see the Citrix client included, but it seems to have problems with multiple desktops on this SLED 10. When I change to another desktop, all the Citrix applications vanishes. I can see in the process list that they still are there, I just can't see them. That worked great on the others.
    So now I am installing it again from scratch, with KDE instead of Gnome, without XGL to see if it works then. Interesting to see what happens when I try to register the same license again. I hope that it was just XGL that broke Citrix.

  15. Change and fear by jolterhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This all boils down to fear. Fear of making a change in the infrastructure. In every sector of the government, it's up to the IT dept. what system is used. Not the administration or central regulations. They trust the IT dept. with this decision. As long as it "works". If all IT depts. were competent and fearless like those pioneers running Indiana Schools, all would probably move away from Microsoft products. Arguments like "but we need Microsoft products to run program x", is just plain fear. It should be "but you (developers) need to make this program run on x".

  16. A common API? by vogon+jeltz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "I think within five years, we'll see a huge market shift," Huffman said. "But the Linux community really has to come together. They do have to have a common API; they've got to have a common installer. If those things don't exist, it will not be a competitive market again. If they do exist, I think it will."

    Like libc? I mean, seriously, I want some of the stuff that guy's smoking. First they go to great length explaining how they diversify on Red Hat, SUSE, Ubuntu and (sigh) Linspire and then he asks for a common API and installer? Like one kid stated when asked which system it preferres, either Linux or Windows the reply was:"Who cares?" Same thing here: who cares for a "common installer" (technically impossible) or a "common API" (it's there: libc, GTK, Qt, etc.). As a user you either see a Gnome or a KDE desktop anyway.
    "Mike Huffman, special assistant for technology at the Indiana Department of Education", gimme a break!

    1. Re:A common API? by Ibag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure what he means by a common API, but maybe he wants binary compatibility? If the state wants to deploy a new program but different distros are compiled with different versions of GCC and include different versions of the standard libraries (or even different subsets of the standard libraries), they can't just distribute a single binary. Depending on what the app is, they could give all of the district admins the source and say "compile this for your system and make it work" but that would be at least slightly annoying. Also, if they wanted to distribute some proprietary closed source program, that would not be an option.

      Asking for a common installer is lunacy, but asking for a common way to install a single binary program across the state isn't.

  17. Indiana Doing Something Progressive? by baronvonchickenpants · · Score: 2, Informative

    In a small Indiana public school, our Middle School "Computer Lab" consisted of 6 Commodore PETs, While I used an Amiga at home. In High School we didn't even have a Lab... typing classes actualy used typewriters!

    Anyway I'm glad to see this so maybe my child will get to use a real computer with a real OS other than at gome.

    --
    "The bad machine doesn't know he's a bad machine."
  18. And remember... by shani · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...there are no kangaroos in Austria.

  19. Re:But think of the Children !! by l3v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nothing useful [...] using Linux only damages its reputation.

    You know, there are people on this planet, who think knowing only the other os and nothing else is what damages your reputation. And also, FYI, people are capable to learn and use not just only one os, and there are plenty of tasks that can be done with plenty of tools, not just one and nothing else. If I'd hire someone who said that can do word processing, then I'd expect him/her to know word processing, not using a one and only word processor application to compose some documents. Oh well, whatever.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  20. Maybe it would be great, if it were true by njdj · · Score: 4, Informative

    And in a flash 22000 Indiana students can't use websites using Flash.

    Of course they can see Flash animations. Personally, I find more than 95% of Flash animations on websites to be a waste of time and bandwidth, and currently disable Flash, but there are several Flash plugins for Linux, including one from Adobe.

    1. Re:Maybe it would be great, if it were true by thejynxed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But, what IT department manager in their right mind, when having the option NOT to install any Flash plugins for Linux, is going to do so willingly, knowing what everyone knows about Flash?

      If you ask me, it is a perfect way to say, "Sorry, no Flash for you." No more annoying Flash adverts, or other exploits.

      Also, this is a perfect time for them to prevent alot of things - remove the CD/DVD-ROM drives from the cases (or alternatively, setup the optical drive access to be ROOT-only), disable installation of P2P apps, etc. This will prevent students from wasting alot of educational resources playing around with crap like Limewire or Diablo II, and frankly, it's been needed for a long time now.

      I admin on a few online games, and let me tell you, the amount of students that are on there during school hours never ceases to amaze me and piss me off at the same time, as I know they are wasting valuable school resources and educational opportunities to play games, instead of doing something useful like learning how to administer a web server, etc. There is a time and place for games, and during class is not one of them IMHO. We have, in fact, as administrators, turned in students to their school principals for precisely this reason. As a staff, we believe in education first, socializing and leisure time second when it comes to our games.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  21. This could lead to a situation like Bavaria by Slayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thirty years ago Bavaria (southern part of Germany) was a somewhat backwards, conservative, agricultural state of Germany, whereas the northers states were highly industrialized and rich. Then the Bavarians started high tech business and have passed the north by far in the mean time.

    Now the smart and educated come to Bavaria to find a decent job...

    From what you tell Indiana tries exactly the same ... we'll see what comes out of that.

  22. Standard installers == Bullshit! by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I call bullshit on all this fud from people decrying the "need" for standard installers.

    1. Try an installer from any of the major distros. They're ALL easier than Windows.

    2. You only install the installer once, then you image the drive and copy the image to the other N computers in the sale.

    3. The end user will NOT be the one installing any of these.

    So everyone, who gives a shit about a common installer? Let the installers proliferate, and we'll continue to have competition for the BEST installer, which will change from year to year, rather than those lame ones we see with the bitch from Redmond that can barely install an OS, never mind 10 gigs of software in one shot (that 10 gigs figure is what I got from installing the latest opensuse distro, fwiw).

    1. Re:Standard installers == Bullshit! by zaphod_es · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Try an installer from any of the major distros. They're ALL easier than Windows.

      That is probably right but it is even easier to have have your new hardware arrive with the software pre-installed. Linux will always be in a distant second place until it is pre-installed.

      The bright side is that Linux does not need a reinstaller :)
    2. Re:Standard installers == Bullshit! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try an installer from any of the major distros. They're ALL easier than Windows.

      If I install a Window's program as an installer, it usually will install on any Windows box. If I download a Linux install image or source, or just try to run a particular program on a bunch of different Linux boxes, I run into problems. That is the issue.

      You only install the installer once, then you image the drive and copy the image to the other N computers in the sale. The end user will NOT be the one installing any of these.

      People don't like switching OS's and having incompatible file types and different programs at home and at school and at work. People will want to run software on some machines that is not installed by the admin on the install image. Thus, if there is not a user friendly way to install a program on workstations of different varieties, that end users find convenient, it will slow the adoption of Linux as a desktop/workstation.

      So everyone, who gives a shit about a common installer? Let the installers proliferate, and we'll continue to have competition for the BEST installer, which will change from year to year

      Competition for installers and package managers is great, but the package format and some functions should really be common standards. I describe what I'd like to see an an installer in a previous post in this discussion. It is great to have different OS's include different programs to do this, so long as they are interoperable and using a common standard to avoid the problems I described above.

    3. Re:Standard installers == Bullshit! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Installing software only from a terminal is fine for a server, or even a developer workstation, but it is not ideal for a normal user's desktop or workstation. Compare the instructions you listed above to dragging an application anywhere on your hard drive, which is what OS X provides. That may give you a hint as to why people are moving from Linux to OS X in droves for workstations. The other part is that such an installation does not always work on every linux variant without dealing with numerous other factors. It does not always handle dependencies, nor updates, nor licensing, nor registration. It does not handle permissions on a per user and per system basis. It does not allow already installed programs to be portable. A standard that does not provide the benefits and features needed to compete is largely useless.

      The procedure is exactly the same for every package prepared with GNU autotools.

      Which accounts for what percentage of software that runs on Linux? We've all had to compile our own software to get the features we want and we've all had to mess with things to get that software working on different distributions. Most of us have failed to get at least something working on some distribution. If you want to compete in the corporate and educational workstation space, you also need to be able to function or at least heavily interoperate with the home workstation, portable, and pro workstation space. That means easy installs and stuff that just works. This is just one of the many reasons I run OS X instead of Linux as my workstation of choice. I use Linux for servers and appliances, but it is just a too much of a pain for my laptop. Now Linux does a few things right, including package managers that link to repositories for software discovery and signing. Also, automated updates of most software are a big plus. In general though, it is just not enough and ideally applications would have all the benefits of Linux and OS X and more besides. I don't think we'll get there for Linux, in general unless there is a standard format for installs with the advantages of GNUStep and a standard for connecting to repositories and update services.

    4. Re:Standard installers == Bullshit! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh?? Linux is booming in the film, animation and scientific industries.

      Linux is doing fine as a server OS. It is doing poorly as a workstation in most fields. It does well in the film industry because of filmgimp, but even there a lot of people have moved to OS X for the workstation. As for scientific "industry" the number of macs as workstations and laptops in most of the sciences has skyrocketed in the last few years, much more so than Linux.

    5. Re:Standard installers == Bullshit! by Constantine+Evans · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just go to a few conventions that used to be Linux strongholds and look at how many powerbooks and macbooks are there now.

      Be sure to check whether those are running OS X or Linux. I had an Ibook for a few years that ran OS X for only a few hours every few months (when I wanted to try it out). The hardware is sometimes worth it (Of course, now I have a Dell laptop which came with free 3 year next business day warranty support for higher education. I don't need reliable hardware if I can have someone come replace everything every few months. I'm already on my third motherboard, third keyboard, and second hinge, and the new motherboard is defective too.)

      I said many of us end up compiling some things from source. I've had to do that for niche applications on Fedora, Suse, and slackware.

      I had thought you were talking about autoconf only from the context. This is a problem. The hope is that most home users won't need those niche applications. But there is definitely room for improvement there.

      Most major software is provided in multiple package formats for the different distributions. Lots of minor software provides one and the source. The source can be troublesome and the packages take extra work and cannot always be shared between distributions. So I have to download a different one for each distro I'm running.

      I doubt that that is going to be solved unless one distribution gains significant marketshare, unfortunately.

      Which is still not as easy as dragging and dropping or throwing something in the trash. Say you have two laptops running the same distro and you want to copy a program from one to the other. You already have a directory shared. According to the desktop metaphor you should be able to just drag the application from one computer to the other or even just run it off the mounted directory. It is intuitive, but it does not work on Linux unless someone is running GNUStep and happens to have something packaged for it, which is rare in the extreme. What about binary software that goes away. I've IM'd copies of such software to friends simply by dragging the icon into my IM chat with them. That is easy and intuitive, but it does not work on Linux.

      That is quite interesting. It should be possible with some work to set up a system in Ubuntu that would act like that using deb packages and a modified file manager. It would also probably not be a bad idea to have themes set up that way, as opposed to the current, very inflexible theme manager. I will have to discuss it with some others. Unfortunately, it would only work with Ubuntu...

      By which I believe you mean, most software does not adhere to a standard but sends random network traffic often in obfuscated formats. As security advances we'll have our programs running in jails and be able to restrict them at will from accessing any given resources. Having an official service for updates and registration in a clear XML format makes it clear what is going out from what application and to whom and lets the user restrict network access for say, a FPS video game from sending out network traffic once it has been registered and until you want to look for an update and lets a user examine what is being sent. This is vital if we ever want to mitigate trojans. It also lets us build standard tools to manage updates and installs, updating everything at, say 1am, instead of when you run it next and want to get work done.

      A standardised system for updates for third-party programs would be great. Ubuntu is already able to update automatically at set times, if I recall, but only for software in the repositories. As for standardised registration, do you mean registration as in network-based licensing, or registration as in registering with a server? A standard for the latter would be nice, but I doubt that developers requiring the former would be willing to use a standard system.

      Thi

  23. Because Linux is a minority OS. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we hope that Linux will ever have the hardware and software support it needs, the only way will be to sing its praises.

    As long as Linux is not in 20% or 30% of desktop machine (at least) it is worth building a body of evidence showing why Linux is a valid alternative.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  24. Props to Lance Woods by Brackney · · Score: 2, Informative

    Props to my old friend Lance Woods who has been working towards this in Indiana for years.

  25. Those aren't problems for kids at school by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your point #1 (lack of documentation) is valid in the Real World, but not for kids at school. If anything, the most important computer-related thing schools teach is how to do research. Considering what you said, Linux is perfect for that! ; )

    Besides, both points are irrelevant anyway because these computers are going to be administered by the school system's IT department, not the students. Presumably, they (a) know what they're doing, and (b) will buy compatible hardware.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  26. There's more than corn in Indiana...... by Slagged · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've lived in Indiana most of my life and I can tell you that, under our current governor, this is all about money. Most of our public schools are terribly underfunded. The motivation to save money anywhere possible is what is driving the Linux migration. Anyone want to lease a tollroad?

    Indiana has been making steady progress in transforming itself into a center of technology innovation. Some of the largest companies in the world are based in Indiana and the military technology sector in Indianapolis and Fort Wayne is unbelieveable. Pharma, Def-Tech, Orthopedics, etc. Indiana is a leader in all these fields.

    Yes, we do grow corn here and a lot of it!

    BTW, we've been trying to give the Gary region near Chicago to Illinois for years but, they won't take it. So it's currently available for anyone wanting to take over the payments....

    --
    Just ask the good Jedi how they feel about "Balance" now...
  27. My Dream Installer by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Brings up an interesting point there as well. Why does there need to be a common installer? There's no common installer in Windows.

    Ahh, but a single installer executable can easily run on most all Windows versions. The same cannot be said of a single installer for all Linux distros. Secondly, installation on Windows is a mess. Part of the reason for moving away from Windows is because they have not fixed problems like these. To make Linux a really good desktop, it should be a lot better than Windows so that when people have a choice of platforms, they choose Linux.

    I don't think anyone does installation perfectly. What I'd like to see is all platforms standardize on a GNUStep-like package format combined with a package manager that integrates licensing, updates, and the like for all software available to a machine, including on network drives, removable media, and for different users. No one has done it completely right yet, that I have seen. I want the drag and drop installation functionality of OS X, including the ability to IM a functional program to someone or plug in a thumb drive and have my preferences from two years ago when I last had access to that program on a network drive to be saved. I want all the dependancies included in the package with versioning and dynamic linking so getting a new library with some program I download can fix bugs in other programs I'm running. I want easy access to the resources of the program like movies, images, and sounds, just by navigating into the folder-is-the-program directory. Similarly I want easy access to fat binaries for multiple processors and even OS's. I want the integrated option to build from the included source instead of using a pre-compiled binary. Disk space is not that expensive anymore. I want a management application built into the OS that knows when I run a new application for the first time, handles registration over the internet or by keys through an official service. I want to be able to manage inherited preferences for the whole machine and for individual users from this manager and handle uninstalls and automated updates.

    Right now Apple has half the solution and Linux has about a third. Sadly GNUStep on Linux seems to have lost momentum since most people who care about Linux as a convenient workstation jumped ship and went to OS X.

    Maybe this is too much to ask, but I really don't think so. The real problem is not even building this system, it is standardizing it and getting all the major players, including Apple and Sun to get onboard.

  28. Preinstalled Linux by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People keep talking about this, but I have not seen any evidence on the Dell website that I can select Linux as an OS when I'm buying a computer. I haven't checked in the past few days or anything, but I did play around a few months ago and the only options under "OS" for their consumer machines was "Windows XP Home Edition" and "Windows XP Professional."

    It'll be a big step forward when Linux is available there as well, just because--even if people don't order it--the fact that it's on the list right next to Windows makes it seem more 'official.'

    The only place I've seen Linux as an option for a preinstalled OS from a major vendor is HP's "Workstation" line (which are really nice computers, and certainly better than the shit they foist on consumers, but not something average people are likely to see). I keep hearing that Dell offers Linux as some sort of option: can anyone explain where it's offered, or what the secret is?

    Of course there are the small companies that offer preinstalled Linux systems, but sadly they seem to be charging a price premium that's really the wrong direction to be going in. Looking only at them versus at Windows boxes, you'd assume that the "Linux tax" is a few hundred dollars more than the Redmond one.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Preinstalled Linux by maotx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have not seen any evidence on the Dell website that I can select Linux as an OS when I'm buying a computer

      Your selection of FreeDOS or RedHat:
      AVAILABLE HERE

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  29. it somehow appears that.... by stewie's+deuce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Macs for the rich, Linux for the poor, and Windows for everybody else.