Slashdot Mirror


China Seizes 13 Million Pirated Discs

TechFreep writes "The Chinese government is waging a 100-day battle against software and media piracy, the largest such effort ever conducted. After launching the effort on July 15, Chinese police and copyright officials have raided 537,000 illegal publication markets and distributors in major cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Liaoning Province. Of these, government officials have closed down 8,907 shops and street vendors, 481 publishing companies and 942 illegal websites." This article in China Daily quotes vendors of legal media products gushing over their increased sales.

197 comments

  1. um, that seems high by svunt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    537,000 illegalmarkets and distributors? I know there are a lot of people in China, but damn, can that possibly be right? If they bust everyone, the US could lose its coveted "most behind bars" status.

    1. Re:um, that seems high by O'Laochdha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, in China they don't stay behind bars as long...

    2. Re:um, that seems high by dvice_null · · Score: 1

      That would be about (537000 / 1300000000 * 100% =) 0.04% of the population.

    3. Re:um, that seems high by brusk · · Score: 1

      Yes, it could be accurate. On city streets in China, there are lots of vendors with a tableful of DVDs and CDs, and they also have stalls in markets, storefronts, etc... all selling pirated materials. If you add the whole supply chain supporting that, it doesn't seem implausible.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    4. Re:um, that seems high by really? · · Score: 1
      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    5. Re:um, that seems high by compro01 · · Score: 1

      i think you punched too one many zeros into your calculator, as i get 537000/1300000000=0.4%

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:um, that seems high by skywalker107 · · Score: 1

      Just got back 2 weeks ago from shanghai and i purchased a couple movies while i was there to watch on my laptop. They are legit from a quality standpoint. They even have stuff there before here. The new Talladaga nights movie was on the shelf for sale over there 2 weeks ago. And yes in just the limited area i was in, I saw at least 50 or 60 different places selling dvd's

      --
      My new title at the office is "Vice-President of Everything Else"
    7. Re:um, that seems high by dvice_null · · Score: 1

      Try with Google, it says:
      http://www.google.com/search?q=537000%2F1300000000 &btnG=Google-haku&meta=
      537 000 / 1 300 000 000 = 0.000413076923

      And to get percents:
      http://www.google.com/search?q=537000%2F1300000000 *100&btnG=Hae&lr=
      (537 000 / 1 300 000 000) * 100 = 0.0413076923

      So I really don't understand why you think that I made a mistake.

    8. Re:um, that seems high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guess what... That Talladega Nights DVD has been available on the internets for much longer than 2 weeks

    9. Re:um, that seems high by Raskolnk · · Score: 1

      >> I know there are a lot of people in China, but damn, can that possibly be right?

      Yes, you'll know if you've ever been to China. As long as there are that many street corners there are that many distributors.

      --
      Don't blame me, I get all my opinions from my Ouija board.
    10. Re:um, that seems high by posdnous · · Score: 1

      I live in China.

      Most of the markets and distributors they speak of is just one peasant carrying around a suitcase with discs in it. Basically, the lowest piece in the totem pole. Compare this to a drug operation, and they basically busted the street pushers.

      All the manufacturers and big wholesalers are still in operation, within 2 weeks, things will be back to normal. Things like this happen every couple of months and people are very used to these "crackdowns", usually timed to co-incide with some visit from an international body.

      The reality of the situation is that piracy will take a LONG time to stamp out in china.

      It is actually a part of chinese culture, chinese consumers rely on pirated discs for their entertainment because the legitimate discs are basically so CRAP, in that the range of programs that you can find on legitimate discs are about 1-2% of the range of programs you can find on pirated discs. Pirated discs are also very convenient, you have distributors in every neighbourhood and the residents in these neighbourhood knows where they are. Whereas finding legitimate discs is a pain in the ass, because the stores are so far and few in between.

      Second, because pirating is percieved here as a victimless crime, especially pirating american programming, there is no stigma attached to being a pirate. Therefore it is really easy for local law enforcement to be bribed by the pirates, hence, any crackdown will just get a few peasants making a few dollars per day and will never get the big kahunas in the pirating industry.

    11. Re:um, that seems high by houjenming · · Score: 1

      I live in Shanghai. I have not seen one change, or raid, or disappearance of a pirated DVD distributor - Not the little, table-on-the-street guys, nor the established, fixed stores. No noticable difference whatsoever.

      This means that EITHER 1) the number 537,000 is complete BS. OR 2) 537,000 is a TINY fraction of the total number.

      ouch.

    12. Re:um, that seems high by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      For those of you who have never been to Asia, piracy in Asia isn't like it is in the western world. People don't go download things, they buy it at a street market. The same markets which will sell counterfeit handbags, sunglasses, and watches will sell you counterfeit DVD's(I'd argue that they are indeed counterfeit as they are packaged in a way to make them look identical to the real thing, they aren't just burnt CD's in a drawer.

      As these markets certainly exist in every single tourist centre, and probably quite a number of places, and the new locations which appeared when old ones were shut down were probably counted as separate markets, I have no problem believing those numbers.

    13. Re:um, that seems high by gauauu · · Score: 1

      I believe it. After living in Shenzhen, China, for 2 years, I saw the truth. There's an illegal cd salesman on almost every street corner. And many small shops (clothes, etc) also have a room in the back where they sell bootleg cds. The best are electronics bizarres. It's a whole building, similar to a flea market, with lots of little stalls selling wares. Most of these stalls will also sell you illegal dvds.

      I don't think 500,000 seems big at all.....

    14. Re:um, that seems high by PRC+Banker · · Score: 1

      It is actually a part of chinese culture, chinese consumers rely on pirated discs for their entertainment because the legitimate discs are basically so CRAP, in that the range of programs that you can find on legitimate discs are about 1-2% of the range of programs you can find on pirated discs.

      Exactly. I too live in China. IF I had a legitimate place to buy DVDs I may consider it, but the fact is there is no legitimate distributor of DVD in my area (a city with a population of 5m+). Even back in the UK, it would take 1+ month to see US releases - a time lag is bad enough, but not being able to buy anything is worse.

      If anything, the present action does nothing other than to boost taobao.com's business (the eBay of China), as a distributor, in place of easy to find shops.

      --
      Oh.
    15. Re:um, that seems high by Foo2rama · · Score: 1

      This includes printed media... Go over there and the book stores are all illegeal copies too.

      --


      ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  2. My problem with this by donatj · · Score: 0, Interesting

    My biggest problem with this is that the majority of this stuff is american, and its banned over there. They litterally can't get this stuff any way other than piracy, and yet the american movie companies are all for it. I don't understand it. I say if we're going to bring down communism we should do it via undermining their contries authority and showing them now the non-commies have it...

    1. Re:My problem with this by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I say if we're going to bring down communism we should do it via undermining their contries authority and showing them now the non-commies have it...

      Have you ever considered the possibility that the huge multinational corporation that produce movies want to keep things the way they are? China's slave, er, child, er inexpensive labor force helps them to maintain their astronomical profits.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:My problem with this by orasio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I say if we're going to bring down communism we should do it via undermining their contries authority and showing them now the non-commies have it...


      China is not a communist country. They are an authoritarian fascist regime.
      The soviet union with Lenin was an example of something a bit more communist, and Cuba regime resembles communism even more.
      All of them share some degree of authoritarism, but that is not a needed or unique characteristic of a communist country.

      Aside from the clarification... why would you want to bring down communism in another country?
      Do you think that the autodetermination principle is not a good thing to respect?
      It's one thing to choose to trade with countries with which you share ideology, but trying to force other independent countries into doing things the way you do, looks pretty authoritarian itself. And it would be hilarious to do that, in the name of democracy.

    3. Re:My problem with this by Bertie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China's not communist by any reasonable definition of the word. Their welfare state makes America's look comprehensive - no state education, no state healthcare, no unemployment benefit. You're on your own, pal. Private enterprise is common and becoming more so, and people have the right to own property. It's not communist, it's just got a very authoritarian government that calls itself communist.

    4. Re:My problem with this by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      "showing them now the non-commies have it"

      I agree, but are our movies the best way to show how the non-commies have it? Tomorrow's DVD releases:
        * "Stay Alive": Americans are so bored with serial murder that they use video games to spice it up.
        * "Grease": Yes, Grease. Americans stay in high school until they are well past 30 and sting songs while doing heavily choreographed dance numbers.
        * "Avatar: The Last Airbender": How Americans view China - I bet they'll get a kick out it!
        * "Stick It": Home, family, country - nothing is as important as winning a gymnastics competition.

      What surprises me is that none of tomorrow's releases are the "blow 'em up big" movies. Was Miami Vice already released on DVD?

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    5. Re:My problem with this by rtjohn · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Aside from the clarification... why would you want to bring down communism in another country? Do you think that the autodetermination principle is not a good thing to respect? It's one thing to choose to trade with countries with which you share ideology, but trying to force other independent countries into doing things the way you do, looks pretty authoritarian itself. And it would be hilarious to do that, in the name of democracy." You must be new here. Let me welcome you to the US.

    6. Re:My problem with this by kabocox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      China's not communist by any reasonable definition of the word. Their welfare state makes America's look comprehensive - no state education, no state healthcare, no unemployment benefit. You're on your own, pal. Private enterprise is common and becoming more so, and people have the right to own property. It's not communist, it's just got a very authoritarian government that calls itself communist.

      Shh, I hope our government doesn't take any lessons from them. Though we'll just arrange our system where people still have freedom of speech, and can blog and complain on the internet with all the millions of other US residents. Heck, we can even still do our voting along our tradional lines since it's understood by those in power and it's hard for your average disgrunted citizen to actually change anything. They have to form a group or party and go through our organized political process. That weeds out all the lazy right there. Everyone who won't go through the "democratic" process can just be labeled an extremist and ignored by most of the citizenery.

    7. Re:My problem with this by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Did you see me use the word "Communist" in that post?

      China uses slave labor. Political prisonors who are forced to work are modern day slaves. China uses child labor. That's what I was talking about.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:My problem with this by orasio · · Score: 1

      I live in Uruguay, but I might as well be living in the US, we are about to sign a free trade agreement that basically imposes that everything that is law in the US regarding copyrights, and patents, should become law here.

      That means, of course, that the FTA will be good for our beef exports to the USA, but kill any attempt to develop new industries, like biotechnology and biopharma (where we could have a bit of a head start in the region), through patent laws that do not adapt to our reality.

      That is because the socialist government elected here is not _that_ socialist to start with, and is willing to play ball, otherwise we could even get a place in the list of countries to liberate (ok, the low priority list, we don't have any oil).

    9. Re:My problem with this by orasio · · Score: 1

      I live in Uruguay, but I might as well be living in the US,


      Well, I correct myself, thinking it through, it's not the same to live in my country as in the US, we might be starting to have all the _problems_ of the US system, but not the money advantages.

    10. Re:My problem with this by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1
      China's not communist by any reasonable definition of the word.

      Correct!

      Their welfare state makes America's look comprehensive

      Of course.

      - no state education,

      Lie, there is a 9-year compulsory education in China without tuition, you still need to pay some fee though.

      no state healthcare,

      Lie. But most of the Private enterprise don't pay insurance.

      no unemployment benefit.

      Lie. Do you mind a quick google?

      You're on your own, pal.

      What do you expect? Rely on the party and government?

      Private enterprise is common and becoming more so, and people have the right to own property.

      Is there anything wrong with private enterprise? Hasn't the free world been working hard to bring this into reality?

      It's not communist, it's just got a very authoritarian government that calls itself communist.

      partially agree.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    11. Re:My problem with this by westlake · · Score: 1
      I don't understand it.

      China wants to protect its domestic film and video industry from cheap foreign imports. It's the usual mix of local politics, cultural and economic imperatives.

      China would also like to be a net exporter of culture. It doesn't need to be told how successful that has been, politically and economically, for the West.

      The American studios think in terms of worldwide production and distribution. You may not have noticed, but Disney has been getting a multicultural and Asian make-over.

      Mulan was simply the beginning.

      This is a frasmework under which deals can be made.

    12. Re:My problem with this by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant no free state education. And as for the unemployment benefit, I was just going by what people have told me. My point was that China's society is set up very differently from what most in the West think of as communism, with full employment, cradle-to-grave welfare, etc. etc.

    13. Re:My problem with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So have there been any communist countries that were communist by whatever defintion you're using?

      China, the Soviet Union, and Cuba have "some degree of authoritism"? Are you kidding me? They are all hugely authoritarian.

      And trying to force other countries to do things the way you do is hilarious? So do you laugh your ass off every day when you watch the news about Iraq?

      Ojala que el ingles no sea tu idioma nativo, porque si lo es, no tienes excusa ninguna por estas tonterias.

    14. Re:My problem with this by orasio · · Score: 1

      I meant they _share_ some degree of authoritarism. Of course, all of them are authoritarian but to a different degree. Cuba does have authoritarism, but it can't be compared to China, where everything you do can get you jailed or executed. The URSS, through its history, went through different phases, all authoritarian off course, but different.

      About forcing other countries to do things your way, is horrendous, not hilarious. Overthrowing a government and installing your own, and then say that you do it in the name of democracy, yes, it's something to laugh at, even if it's pathetic.
      -------------
      Como se puede notar claramente, el inglés no es mi lengua materna.

      Yo decía que _comparten_ algún grado de autoritarismo. Distinto grado en cada caso, por supuesto. Cuba tiene problemas de autoritarismo, por supuesto, pero no existe el nivel de opresión de China, donde no se puede hacer nada sin ser objeto de represión. La Unión Soviética ha pasado por distintos grados en distintas épocas, y es verdad, siempre fue bastante malo.

      Forzar a otros países a seguir tu ideología es horroroso, no hilarante. Cambiar el gobierno de otro país por uno que te gusta, y luego decir que lo hacés en el nombre de la democracia, sí, tiene una ironía tal que es para cagarse de risa.

  3. 537,000 down... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    only 90 bazillion more to go! That picture from TFA is wild, though (mountain of CDs being crushed by steamrollers). That looks like some kinda explosion at a CD store.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:537,000 down... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
      That picture from TFA is wild, though.
      Wow, they finally figured out how to put pictures in intertube news?

      For those who don't get it, check the last few dozen linked articles... 90% of them are pure text (sometimes spread over a few pages to increase ad revenues).
    2. Re:537,000 down... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      ... and what's with websites that have underline text for mouse-overs on regular text?!?

    3. Re:537,000 down... by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      That's that Intellitxt inline spamming JavaScript crap. It basically scans the content of a page and turns certain keywords into anchors hooked into a style sheet that pops up the ads when you mouse over it.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    4. Re:537,000 down... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm talking about full paragraphs (basically, all the text on the page) having a mouse-over underline but without any link to the text itself.

  4. Shit! by slummy · · Score: 1

    I wonder if my "The Shield - Season 5" bootleg is still going to ship!?

    1. Re:Shit! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I dunno about Season 5. But you should have posted AC. Now I'm afraid "The Shield" my come knocking on your door in with the letters F. B. I

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Shit! by slummy · · Score: 1

      who cares -- it was a joke anyway. I wouldn't dare pay for a bootleg. ;)

  5. Awww... come on by 1010110010 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where else are we going to see blurbs like this on DVD covers?

    1. Re:Awww... come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's even scarier than Orwell.

      Apparently all those 1.3 million CDs were Britney Spears albums!
      *;-O

  6. /.edness protection by Toasty16 · · Score: 4, Informative

    full text:

    The Chinese government is waging a 100-day battle against software and media piracy, the largest such effort ever conducted.

    After launching the effort on July 15, Chinese police and copyright officials have raided 537,000 illegal publication markets and distributors in major cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin and Liaoning Province. Of these, government officials have closed down 8,907 shops and street vendors, 481 publishing companies and 942 illegal websites.

    Two of the largest pirated media operations in Liaoning Province, one located near Shenyang's Sanhao Street, the other in the Science and Technology Park of Liaoning University, were among those targeted.

    These two centres provided over 90 per cent of all pirated compact disks to the city residents, said Wang Hongyu, head of Shenyang Anti-Pirated Enforcement Team. But now you can hardly find any pirated products there.

    The crack down was initiated by more than 10 ministries and national departments, including the Ministry of Culture, the Ministry of Security, the State Administration of Press and Publication, and the National Copyright Administration. Each of the 13 million illegal CDs and DVDs that were seized up to this point in the raids were destroyed on September 16th.

  7. Give me a break by tsunamiiii · · Score: 1

    Ive got nothing against China, hey I love their food. But why every few years when they roll out the steamroller and drive over a pile of software and music, is it such big news. All of the warez sites there are up and running just fine, its such a transparent attempt at fending off trade lawsuits its not funny.

    1. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      cheap-oem-software.org is down. so are a few others.

    2. Re:Give me a break by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Warez sites dont charge for the product. These are black market items, sold for profit.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  8. Keep going... by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is suicidal for America to not tie very strong IP enforcement to its trade agreements with countries like China. Most of what we produce domestically is IP from music to code to drug designs. We are at an inherent disadvantage then, if we allow them to dump tens of billions of dollars of cheap crap in our stores, but allow their locals to run wild with our IP.

    I don't like it, but that's just the way it is.

    If you want to reduce our dependency on IP and strong foreign IP laws, go start a manufacturing business that produces in America at rates that can replace China and Taiwan.

    Until then, I am glad to see China stepping things up, as it means we aren't getting shafted so badly anymore.

    1. Re:Keep going... by syntaxglitch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but how much paying for American IP can China really support? I can't imagine that most users of pirated software over there could afford to pay full price for a legit license. Eliminating a lot of piracy seems like it would either wreak havoc on China (they won't push it that far, I'm sure) or, to take the typical /. angle, drive people towards other alternatives like open source (or perhaps local IP industries?).

      More likely I think is that it's mostly a loud show of effort and piracy in China will continue unabated once the current effort quiets down.

      In the end, we still need China more than they need us. :(

    2. Re:Keep going... by fuzznutz · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If you want to reduce our dependency on IP and strong foreign IP laws, go start a manufacturing business that produces in America at rates that can replace China and Taiwan.
      No problem. Can I sign you up to work for me for $3.00 a day?
    3. Re:Keep going... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want to reduce our dependency on IP and strong foreign IP laws, go start a manufacturing business...

      What America needs is an IP-manufacturing based economy, not a IP-distribution based economy.

      We need to start selling the service of creating IP directly instead of indirectly funding it by charging for distribution. Since distribution is essentially free, thanks to the net, and it's clearly impossible to compete with free, then we need a new system. Not legal protectionism that conflicts with one of the most key elements of human nature -- the desire to share knowledge.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Keep going... by s20451 · · Score: 1

      Not legal protectionism that conflicts with one of the most key elements of human nature -- the desire to share knowledge.

      In what way does the copyright on a book prevent you from going to the library and learning all you want for free?

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    5. Re:Keep going... by russ1337 · · Score: 1
      t is suicidal for America to not tie very strong IP enforcement to its trade agreements with countries like China. Most of what we produce domestically is IP from music to code to drug designs. We are at an inherent disadvantage then, if we allow them to dump tens of billions of dollars of cheap crap in our stores, but allow their locals to run wild with our IP.
      You are right, you cant 'depend' on IP. China is really just going through its 'modern industrial age' and sure, right now its making more - cheaper.... Give it 10 to 15 years and China will be kicking arse on research into tech and medicine. I believe China's IP has the (future) potential to be more valuable than the US's. America's economy is afloat due to the Medical world and while China can make drugs under licence cheaper than the US can, it would have to pay huge IP rates to the US companies. If China gets into the buisniness of developing their own drugs, they could very likley be more effective than 'current' (US) drugs, AND they'll be making them cheaper. If this eventuates, they'll suck money out of the US pretty fast. (Of course they would have to get new drugs past the FDA and a US company or government aint going to let that happen if it damages the economy - even if it is better for the health of its citizens.) But that is where the pressure from the WTO comes back on the US...

      My point is this: When China 'catches up' they will invest in the 'IP' approach and have the ability to make it cheaper. China's 1.3 Billion vs USA's 0.3 Billion people has the potential to yield far more value in IP. It all boils down to their people being willing to work harder for less.
    6. Re:Keep going... by Astro+Dr+Dave · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It is suicidal for America to not tie very strong IP enforcement to its trade agreements with countries like China. Most of what we produce domestically is IP [...]
      ...which just goes to show you that our economy is based on a house of cards. Seriously - an IP economy is inherently unstable, because it depends on the cooperation of everyone else (never mind that it also works better in a police state). So we strong-arm other nations to get their cooperation, but countries and people don't like having laws dictated to them via trade agreements. And for rapidly developing countries like China, it isn't in their best interest to have strict IP laws, which probably explains why this is only a "100 day" crackdown.
    7. Re:Keep going... by Znork · · Score: 1

      "go start a manufacturing business that produces in America"

      The indirect taxation effects of US IP legislation on American workers is part of why it's too expensive to produce in the US.

      "as it means we aren't getting shafted so badly anymore."

      Actually, it just means the Chinese will get shafted as badly as Americans. The economic impact of intellectual property is comparable to communist-era state factories; one protected business form has just been replaced with another, both are more or less equivalent drains of inefficiency on the economy as a whole.

      Protect companies from competition and they will quickly cease to be competetive.

      And please. Dont kid yourself that the actual production of intellectual monopoly material wont be moved to lower cost countries. At which point the US will really get screwed every way and backwards, unless the US politicians imagine they'll be able to extricate themselves from the IP nightmare they've built at that point.

    8. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way does the copyright on a book prevent you from going to the library and learning all you want for free?

      Which is exactly why linux is developed on paper amoung the moldy stacks across the four corners of the world. Who needs this damn interpiratenet anyway!?!

    9. Re:Keep going... by s20451 · · Score: 1

      Where did I mention software in my original post?

      Linux is also copyrighted. It just happens to be distributed with a reasonably permissive license, but one that is enforced from time to time.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    10. Re:Keep going... by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      I sure hope so. I love cheap chinese products. My garage is stocked with all sorts of tools that would have bankrupted me if I had to spring for even the Craftsman versions at sears. Especially the specialty automotive tools that I've only needed to use once or twice. I never would have bought them, except they were like $10-$15 at Harbor Freight.

      I think American IP laws are ridiculously imbalanced. If American companies can't come up with a better business plan than "rip off the consumers", they deserve to be beaten down. I really hope China "plays along" just long enough to get accepted into WIPO.

      On the other hand, its nice to see authorities going after the real criminals (the ones making massive quantities of bootlegs that are actually stealing sales and without a doubt actually violating copyright laws). Its a refreshing change from the ridiculous tactic of suing customers the RIAA has been using here. At least one country is finally getting it right!

      --
      blog
    11. Re:Keep going... by s20451 · · Score: 1

      The economic impact of intellectual property is comparable to communist-era state factories; one protected business form has just been replaced with another, both are more or less equivalent drains of inefficiency on the economy as a whole.

      Do you have data to back up that rather sweeping statement? A more supportable view would be that the USA has both some of the world's strongest IP protections and one of the world's highest rates of investment in research, which is probably no coincidence.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    12. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that as if America still holds all the power.

      Considering how much debt America has that is held by countries like China, you really can't call the shots except with nations that are much smaller and unimportant (see Australia).

    13. Re:Keep going... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      If you want to reduce our dependency on IP and strong foreign IP laws, go start a manufacturing business that produces in America at rates that can replace China and Taiwan.

      Of course that is impossible, since America has strict labor rights laws, whereas China does not. The only way to compete 'fairly' would be to setup a tarrif on imports which makes up for this gap as long as China does not have similar worker's rights laws.

    14. Re:Keep going... by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      That's all fine and dandy for books. And probably records, tapes and CDs, too.

      You've touched on what the fine folks in the media biz refer to as the "analog hole". Information carrying devices such as paper books cannot easily be encrypted to enforce copyright, because printing a book of cyphertext would render it useless to the purchaser. The only hope for "protecting" analog content from ...uh... "pirates", libraries, and consumers (oh my!), is the Broadcast Flag that has so far failed to pass Congress (but that doesn't stop ignorant Senators from continuing to bring it back up).

      But imagine if you checked out a book and it contained seemingly random letters, and you had to decode it in order to read it. That's the Content Biz's view of the future. While they can't do that to the old stuff, they want to lock down any new digital content at all costs. And none of that protection has the end-of-copyright coded into it, so 100 years from now, when all that content should enter the public domain, it will still be locked out by the DRM, in violation of copyright law. So while it won't stop YOU from going to the library (because more than likely we'll all be dead of old age long before today's music/movies/news/info will be in the public domain), but when your great grandchildren go to the library the DRM of today would restric them.

      Beyond that DRM on copyrighted material already causes problems for legitimate purchasers. I can't listen to my (very few) iTunes purchases on all of my computers simply because I have more Macs than Apple expected me to purchase. Maybe they're trying to tell me not to buy as much of their hardware, or maybe they're trying to "protect" me from accdidentally becoming a Scourge of the Seven Seas! Instead I've simply decided not to purchase any DRM-crippled content from iTunes or any other online service.

      Instead I use Netflix and occassionally purchase a CD if I know i'll like it (ie. i've heard enough of it to know its worth the $10-$15 I'm going to pay). I know I bought a couple of CDs this year, and I have accumulated close to 500 DVDs over the years, though my DVD purchases have pretty much stopped ever since the movie studios stopped making movies worth watching... sometime around 2004 or 2005.

      Now my only source for cinematic disappointment is via Netflix, but I can listen to crappy music on the radio, Sirius, or my own collection, (ripped from my CDs, which now live in binders in the closet, because the jewel cases were taking up too much space, and I have no need for the physical medium except as a backup).

      --
      blog
    15. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely irrational argument. We'll pay some one to make it but we can't allow them to sell it? Who exactly is going to pay for music and movies to be made? This isn't about freely exchanging information. No one is keeping important facts from you by charging for movies. The First Amendment doesn't give you the right to free copyrighted material. It's called entertainment. You want entertainment you pay for entertainment. You don't want for it don't just don't take it because you can. Haven't got the money? Well you apparently have a computer and a web connection so there's a staggering amount of legal entertainment on the web. The free market works. Insisting some one else pay for your music and movies isn't going to happen. They'll simply go away. The people financing them will put their money in the stock market and you'll be SOL.

    16. Re:Keep going... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It boils down to the fact that living in america is currently more desirable so the cost of living here is being bid up.

      It does not cost $750,000 to buy a middle class house in China. $50,000 annual salary is not considered poverty wages like it is in new york.

      They are a few decades behind us in terms of inflation (at one point it would have been a hundred years but things are flattening quickly).

      Very quickly- the rich are going to be the only people with houses in the safe areas with good weather. Just simple economics- even if a poor person has it now, the rich person will buy it from them- and if they won't sell, the rich person has the government condemn their property and sell it to the rich person. The government will do this since the rich person can pay them $12,000 annual taxes while the poor person would only pay $3,000 annual taxes.

      It is all a question of how desirable is it to live somewhere. As the communist countries stablize to the point where rich people are not afraid of being killed or having their property confiscated by the government, they will bid the hell out of those low prices. And just like people find it cheaper to live in nevada and FLY to work in california, people will not be able to afford to live in the pretty chinese areas with good weather either.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    17. Re:Keep going... by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      The problems with piracy in China are not only with software and media. From what I've heard, you can buy a fake anything there. Books, golf clubs, watches - anything. This seems like an action designed to get China into the better graces of the West without really addressing the issue.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    18. Re:Keep going... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative

      except they were like $10-$15 at Harbor Freight.

      You gotta watch some of that Harbor Freight stuff. I bought a mini-lathe there a couple of years ago. Let's just say plastic threads don't work very well.
      Cheap is one thing, but cheap and useless is just a waste of money. I'd rather spend $300, and have it actually work, than spend $30, and it's useless.

    19. Re:Keep going... by s20451 · · Score: 1

      In my original post, I was using an example to illustrate that intellectual property protection does very little to interfere with the free exchange of knowledge. I was making no point at all with respect to the free exchange of content, which is not the same thing. I was trying to say that you can still gain as much knowledge from information protected by intellectual property as you can with information in the public domain, because the publisher's business model is based on the fact that s/he has knowledge to share with you.

      Indeed, according to the short statement at the bottom of this page, "All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster." Thus, the material you are reading right now is both copyrighted and in a digital form, yet you are gaining knowledge from it. The same is true, for that matter, of virtually every page on the web. I conclude that, even with DRM, the "free exchange of knowledge" is in no particular danger from intellectual property protection.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    20. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. You are another nitwit who doesn't understand that information, knowledge and 'content' are all essentially synonyms for the bits that represent them in digital form. Go read up on information theory before trying to make such useless artificial distinctions.

    21. Re:Keep going... by stubear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I think American IP laws are ridiculously imbalanced. If American companies can't come up with a better business plan than "rip off the consumers", they deserve to be beaten down."

      Please tell us what that better business plan is? Why should a company direct resources toward research and development only to have another company come along and cheaply manufacture the exact same thing without having to worry about recouping the R&D? If the company that developed the product competed on cost they woudl take far longer to turn a profit and be able to reinvest in future projects but the rip-off company can just move along to something else to rip-off.

    22. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In just what manner does your non-solution deal with the fact that distribution is cost-free on the net? Oh right, you ignored that inconvenient fact and instead went off the old moralizing baloney we've all heard before.

      Come back when you've got an original idea.

    23. Re:Keep going... by s20451 · · Score: 1

      Great. You are another nitwit who doesn't understand that information, knowledge and 'content' are all essentially synonyms for the bits that represent them in digital form. Go read up on information theory before trying to make such useless artificial distinctions.

      The conclusion that information, knowledge, and content are all the same, simply because they are all represented digitally, is totally incorrect in practice because humans treat them differently. Copyrighted text is broadcast extensively over the internet by sites such as this one, at usually no cost to read. Copyrighted content in the form of, say, music or video, is much more tightly controlled.

      As for information theory, go read "The Bandwagon" by Claude E. Shannon, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, March 1956.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    24. Re:Keep going... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's just the way it should be. If consumers are so cheap that they'll buy cheap rip-offs instead of the quality products, and this puts the innovative companies out of business, then so be it. We'll all just suffer with less innovation then.

      These laws are trying to fight against human nature, which is just a bad idea and futile. If the People are going to do things which cause the economy to collapse, let them!

    25. Re:Keep going... by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      Let's see. Please tell me a better business plan than outlawing automobiles so that horse and buggy drivers won't be out of a job. Progress happens, and outdated business models cannot always compete in the future.

      There are existing laws that provide the kind of protection you describe. I don't have issue with those. In fact, I think its great that the Chinese government is going after the mass bootleggers who are in fact ripping off the media industry by doing exactly what you say.

      What I disagree with are all of the new laws that Old-Fat-Lazy-Businesses are trying to force on the world in order to slow or even stop technological and cultural progress. Its a bunch of rich bastards manipulating the system at the expense of the rest of the world. Perhaps that's a good business model while it lasts, but I certainly don't want to put up with it as a consumer.

      I agree that $3 CDRs sold on the street are rip-offs of the $15 CDs sold in the "real stores" (and I applaud the Chinese Gov't for going after them), but I also believe that $15 CDs are a ripoff for the consumer, when more efficient and cheaper methods of distribution are available. The industry is crippling the Internet as a distribution method with DRM in order to save the huge margins they still make on the outdated medium. Oh yeah.. and they keep trying to cripple CDs, too, to try to move us towards acceptance (kind of how 10 years of unfixed bugs led us to accept "Blue Screen of Death" as a fact of life).

      Business models aren't meant to last forever. Corporations can die. Its ok.

      --
      blog
    26. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is totally incorrect in practice because humans treat them differently. Copyrighted text is broadcast extensively over the internet by sites such as this one, at usually no cost to read. Copyrighted content in the form of, say, music or video, is much more tightly controlled.

      No. SOME people treat them differently. Those are the people mentally stuck in the 19th and 20th centuries. Everyone else naturally understands that there is no difference. Sites like youtube, googlevideo, etc all reflect that.

      It's been a scarcity of bandwidth and the artificial laws prohibiting distribution and modification that have caused people to treat different forms of analog media differently in the digital world. Freed of those two constraints, people naturally revert to treating them identically - as evidenced by the vast pirate networks that make no such limiting distinctions.

      As for information theory, go read "The Bandwagon" by Claude E. Shannon, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, March 1956.

      If you really understood Shannon's complaints about the "bandwagon effect" you would have known that his criticisms of the popularization of information theory are not applicable in this context.

    27. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Where did I mention software in my original post?

      You didn't, that's the point.

      If everyone thought like you, there would be no need for the Internet.

    28. Re:Keep going... by s20451 · · Score: 1

      No. SOME people treat them differently. Those are the people mentally stuck in the 19th and 20th centuries. Everyone else naturally understands that there is no difference. Sites like youtube, googlevideo, etc all reflect that.

      The original AC insisted that "information, knowledge, and 'content'" are the same. It's hard to see that there is as much "knowledge" being conveyed by music as by text; indeed, it is quite possible for music to be content-free as far as knowledge is concerned. Same goes, for example, for an executable file.

      It's been a scarcity of bandwidth and the artificial laws prohibiting distribution and modification that have caused people to treat different forms of analog media differently in the digital world. Freed of those two constraints, people naturally revert to treating them identically - as evidenced by the vast pirate networks that make no such limiting distinctions.

      You have chosen to ignore my point, which is that people do not gain knowledge from all information sources equally. People have not suddenly started to learn from listening to music as opposed to reading books, and it's hard to argue that they ever will, file sharing notwithstanding. Meanwhile, right now, in a world with copyright, there are relatively few pieces of knowledge that are cut off from you by copyright. The same is not true of "content" in the form of music, video, and so on.

      If you really understood Shannon's complaints about the "bandwagon effect" you would have known that his criticisms of the popularization of information theory are not applicable in this context.

      I am aware that I am applying Shannon's bandwagon observation beyond its original intended meaning, but his point is the same: to invoke information theory to describe how people consume information is to distort his theory beyond its intended application. Indeed, Shannon explicitly excluded the meaning of the information from his study. Thus, the original AC poster (you?) misunderstands information theory by claiming that we can conclude information, knowledge, and content are the same. Knowledge and content are the meaning of the information, and information theory says nothing about them.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    29. Re:Keep going... by smitingpurpleemu · · Score: 1

      Haven't the arguments against the minimum wage been blurted out by right-wing ideologues been shouted down already? Sheesh, I thought they were gone already. I guess they aren't.

    30. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people do not gain knowledge from all information sources equally.

      You are the one making up this requirement that they be equal. That's totally bogus.

      People have not suddenly started to learn from listening to music as opposed to reading books,

      Just because you can't perceive the knowledge that is there does not mean it is not there. There is all kinds of useful information to be gleaned from this second-class "content." Any anthropologist will tell you that a society's "entertainment" embodies all kinds of knowledge - both of the individual creators and of the society at large as passed through the filter of those creators. Not to mention the kind of instruction a student of the art can take from examining other's creations.

      No wonder you think the way you do - you are unable to get beyond your own perspective and think the world is limited to the way you perceive it. You think you can draw some sort of arbitary line seperating information from knowledge - except the line you draw has no meaning, or more importantly, value to anyone besides yourself. That's why there is no difference between "knowledge" and "information" itself - the difference is in the context, the eye of the beholder determines what useful information can be extracted - but the bits are the same either way.

    31. Re:Keep going... by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      The DRM currently being Beta Tested on consumers already restricts the "spread of knowledge". In fact the whole purpose of current DRM efforts is precisely to restrict if and how a user may access the content. And if you can't get at the content, you can't gain the knowledge. None of the DRM efforts are attempting to stop the massive bootleg CD and DVD industry, which doesn't even bother with the protected digital files to begin with... they simply dupe discs. Its all geared towards consumer inconvenience, which makes the opposite of sense.

      The DMCA is a wonderful example of a law stifling the spread of knowledge. Not long after the DMCA was passed there was a professor somewhere who had found a security flaw in PDFs or maybe it was to allow PDFs to be viewable on ebook readers. I don't remember. Anyway, he intended to present his research at a conference, but did not due to legal threats based on the DMCA that he would be arrested for divulging information about flaws in the PDF DRM. That's what you and I might call censorship, and certainly is a first amendment violation.

      I'm more or less OK with the ideas of trademarks and copyright. They serve a valid purpose. I'm not arguing that.

      I just feel that the changes to those laws, starting back with the Sony Bono copyright term-extension (75 or 90 years after death, so your kids can keep exclusive rights to exploit your body of work) have unfairly shifted the balance away from the spread of knowledge, in order to line the pockets of a greedy few. Music, books and movies we enjoy today will not be accessible in the public domain until long after we are all dead. If they don't maintain their popularity, they will go out of print, and even fanatics won't be able to find a legal copy. And even if they do last long enough, the DRM on the digital files may still restrict access. We're heading in the wrong direction.

      Although no form of DRM has successfully locked down anything yet, there are still many entities with big bankrolls working hard to try to make that happen, and they are abusing law to accomplish what they fail to do technologically, all in the name of "intellectual property protection". The future of IPP law is precisely about limiting the free exchange of knowledge.

      --
      blog
    32. Re:Keep going... by s20451 · · Score: 1

      You are the one making up this requirement that they be equal. That's totally bogus.

      Pardon me? I'm not the one who said information, knowledge, and content were synonyms. I'm saying that different kinds of content convey markedly different amounts of information. I'm surprised that this would be a controversial statement.

      That's why there is no difference between "knowledge" and "information" itself - the difference is in the context, the eye of the beholder determines what useful information can be extracted - but the bits are the same either way.

      In the context of information theory, I disagree -- the study of information tells us nothing about meanings. Indeed, Shannon's information is independent of knowledge. The latest single from your favorite band conveys as much "information" as the equivalent amount of white noise.

      Anyway, nice chatting with you, I have other things to attend to.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    33. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm saying that different kinds of content convey markedly different amounts of information. I'm surprised that this would be a controversial statement.

      That's not the controversial part. The controversial part is where you say that content with low information content is somehow "second class" or less deserving of sharing than any other content. (and thus presumably, somehow more deserving of legal copy restrictions).

      The latest single from your favorite band conveys as much "information" as the equivalent amount of white noise.

      I already debunked this claim once. How many times more is it necessary before you give it up? Just because you can't perceive the information in it does not mean it isn't there. You seem enamored of written text -- so just how much information does the latest bodice-ripper contain? None? More than a song?

      But all of your semantics are really moot - because whether you think it is information-full or information-free it doesn't matter, people naturally want to share it and the internet makes that sharing essentially cost free.

      It's the zero-cost part and the desire to share - as evidenced by every single data source on the net, legal or not - that mean distribution-control laws are just the broken remanents of a pre-Internet market.

    34. Re:Keep going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to brush up on your history.
      The PDF guy was a Russian, working for a company that sold a product based on cracking ebooks so they could be used in other contexts. He came to the US and presented the information on how it was cracked and he was arrested.

      A case where someone ostensibly chose to with-hold information was the guy who figured out how to crack HDCP - the copy-prevention system on most new HDTV sets. He explicitly said that for fear of the DMCA, he would not be divulving the details.

    35. Re:Keep going... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Not really, its more complex than that.

      What's China going to do with all that debt? Liquidate it? Devalue the dollar? Doesn't work; the yuan is tied to the dollar.

      The only reason China is holding all that debt is because they need to prop up the dollar, and they need America to maintain sufficent foreign reserves purchase cheap Chinese products. They're basically offering us credit to buy their stuff; that's how you (have to) resolve trade deficets. Of course, the counterbalance, economically, to a trade defecit is floating currency; but that's something we do not have with China.

      China and American cannot act each other economically. Any kind of disruption would be disasterous to the other. This is why the U.S. cannot force China to float it's currency, and this is why China does not run U.S. foreign policy.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    36. Re:Keep going... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      $3? Try 50 cents. That's what they cost here in Shenyang.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    37. Re:Keep going... by stubear · · Score: 1

      So you're OK with blackmail as an interruptive business model? I'm all for new business models superseding current ones, but I am not OK with illegal business methods being touted as business models and forcing legitimate businesses to either cut and run or seek alternatives to turing a profit with their product. Your horse and buggy example is a straw man, nothing more, but to put it into context of my argument, there was nothing illegal about automobiles. They simply provided a better, faster and more convenient mode of transportation. If you want to create your own content and distribute it via P2P or by offering services to support it, fine, but don't expect all the other media companies to follow suit until the business model can be proven to work. I can get filet mignon at a nice restaurant. Does this mean I can force McDonald's to offer it on their menu as well? No, I cannot. I can stop giving McDonald's my patronage until they start offering filet mignon on the menu. If you don't like the way current media companies are distributing their content, then don't give them your patronage, but don't expect to be able to legally procure their content simply because you disagree with the means in which they distribute it.

  9. Illegal Websites? by celardore · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    government officials have closed down 8,907 shops and street vendors, 481 publishing companies and 942 illegal websites.

    Shutting down 942 'illegal' websites means nothing purely because it's China. Wikipedia is illegal there, so is Slashdot probably.

    1. Re:Illegal Websites? by O'Laochdha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that those websites are illegally maintained as opposed to just illegally accessed. Jimbo sits comfortably in the U.S., and there's nothing China can do about it but block his site. These people are actually breaking the law, and that's a bit more serious.

    2. Re:Illegal Websites? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      I remember reading somewhere that the Chinese censors don't care all that much about English-language content, so Slashdot is probably exempt. This might be, however.

    3. Re:Illegal Websites? by dave1447 · · Score: 1

      Correct. I just got back from two months in China and Slashdot is fully accessible there.

    4. Re:Illegal Websites? by zinzarin · · Score: 1

      I've spent nearly 3 month this year in China, over the coarse of 3 different trips. Slashdot has always been accessible (this surprises me, given stories like this very one we're discussing). Wikipedia has never been accessible (not even en.wikipedia). Blogspot has been hit or miss. Otherwise, I've been able to navigate wherever I wanted to go, including websites with info on the Tianenmen Square massacre.

  10. 100 0 by webrunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    100day vs 0day

    Hmm, at least numbers are on their side.

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
  11. A gold star for effort, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... what about all the online illegal p2p'ing going on? If the Chinese government could establish caps on that, it would be much more effective since the pirated data will just be transcribed onto a CD/DVD and sold.

  12. This is good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVD-R is the future! You can put 7(!) times the AVI on it than on CD-R!

    I really like it that the Chinese care as much about quality as I do. Screeners are often to big for single CD-R these days...

  13. Official statement from the pirates themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    We so horny. We only use software for porn. Solly cholly. We boom boom long time.

  14. Chinese math by nuzak · · Score: 1

    So after shutting down those 8,907 shops and street vendors, 481 publishing companies and 942 illegal websites, what are the remaining 526,670 all about? Are they counting individual disks?

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  15. High? Maybe Because It Has Another Use? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh, don't forget this article that states they were going to send out one million spam warnings to spammers. One million spammers? Here in the United States, it seems to be 9 or 10 parties that create 99% of the spam. Why is it so different in China? Is one in every thousand Chinese citizens a spammer?

    Perhaps this is just another law that China will use to silence people (like I mentioned here)?

    Speak out against the government and have your apartment ransacked for pirated DVDs. They find them everytime and you don't have to worry about a trial -- you were ready to distribute them! Makes the government look good and invites companies to come to China. Win-win situation for the government!

    --
    My work here is dung.
  16. Time to buy MSFT? by DebianDog · · Score: 1

    With Vista coming out and the Chinese having to actually purchase software can we expect revenue to grow again?

    1. Re:Time to buy MSFT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously think they will spend something like $200 (1600+ yuen) on an OS? That'd be at least 3/4th of the monthly salary of an average blue-collar worker. More likely we'd see an explosion in the use of Linux, which is perfectly fine by me :)

    2. Re:Time to buy MSFT? by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      Agreed I think you will see an up shoot in Linux but I thought Microsoft had a different pricing ladder over there.

    3. Re:Time to buy MSFT? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I think what's more likely is that they'd continue to use their pirated copies of XP Corporate and keep pumping out seeminly valid VLKs.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  17. Counterfitting != Piracy by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hate it when the media misuse the word "pirate". You'd think Slashdot could at least get it right.

    Illegal copies sold at retail are counterfit copies, not "pirated copies".

    Piracy is when you copy content yourself for free. With piracy, no one profits off someone else's hard work.

    Counterfitting is when someone runs illegal copies and then sells the copies for their own profit.

    It's a subtle difference, but an important one.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by Shadyman · · Score: 1, Funny

      In Communist China, Media Couterfeits YOU!

    2. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's a subtle difference, but an important one."

      Important only because the RIAA and MPAA (and amusingly enough, other organizations - there are publishers of books who would love to see libraries razed to the ground, for example) would love to see that difference be erased.

      Copying for personal use and copying to make a profit off of someone else's work are two very different things - this is obvious to anyone with a braincell. But remember, laywers don't have many of those to spare.

    3. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by O'Laochdha · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, piracy is the misappropriation of a sea vessel with or without intent to return. Copying without profit is intellectual property infringement.

    4. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats funny.

      The British have used the term Piracy in the terms of meaning copyright infringement for almost 400 years...since about the time of the cheap printing presses.

      Why after a few centuries should we be forced to use another word for it because some fucking moron child that wants to cloud the water says so. Copyright infringement is piracy. Piracy can be copyright infringement.

      Just because RMS wants to change the meaning of words to his own intent in his great and unfailing manafesto, don't feel the need to suck his cock.

    5. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by noidentity · · Score: 1

      It's a counterfeit only if the sellers were claiming it was an authorized copy ("the real thing"). I think most buyers would know that a $2 DVD is not such a thing.

    6. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      No, piracy is the misappropriation of a sea vessel with or without intent to return. Copying without profit is intellectual property infringement.

      That's just as wrong, but more subtly so, and therefore more damaging. There is no such thing as "intellectual property infringement" because the term "intellectual property" is newspeak made up by the publishing industry in attempt to muddy the distinction between patents, copyright, and property. The proper term for the misdemeanor in question is copyright infringement.

    7. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Piracy is when you copy content yourself for free. With piracy, no one profits off someone else's hard work.
      Counterfitting is when someone runs illegal copies and then sells the copies for their own profit.


      Dude, I've never heard of counterfit used in the manner you believe. I have seen in many places for piracy and pirated copies being used in that manner. I've always been told that Piracy is copying media and then selling it. Copying content and not selling it isn't piracy. It may be copyright infringement, but it isn't piracy.

    8. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by bdonalds · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't like to be pedantic, but if you can't even spell it, it takes the edge off of your lecture about it's definition. (It's "counterfeit", BTW)

      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
    9. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original poster was definitely off and I agree that you've got it right. Counterfeiting and piracy are not mutually exclusive. Counterfeits are specifically meant to trick someone into thinking they're "the real thing". Piracy is simply a type of theft, independent of whether it was meant to look like an original. (Of course the definition of theft of intellectual property varies a lot depending on who you ask.)

    10. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by value_added · · Score: 2, Informative

      Counterfitting is when someone runs illegal copies and then sells the copies for their own profit. It's a subtle difference, but an important one.

      Err ... that's counterfeiting.

      Subtle difference, but an important one.

    11. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

      Ditto for your punctuation. The possessive form of it does not take an apostrophe any more than yours or hers.

    12. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by westlake · · Score: 1
      With piracy, no one profits off someone else's hard work.

      There is always "profit" even if it is only the ego-boost the pirate gets in posting his latest rip to the P2P nets.

      The profit-motive as a requirement for criminal prosecution of copyright infrigemrnt disappeared from American law with the signing of the NET Act (No Electronic Theft) ca 1998.

    13. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by stubear · · Score: 1

      That wasn't the possessive form, it was merely a contraction of "it is".

    14. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by westlake · · Score: 1
      piracy is the misappropriation of a sea vessel with or without intent to return

      Copyright infringement was being defined as piracy while the Black Flag still flew over the Carribean. Electronic Piracy FAQ

      The usage is now deeply entrenched and in common usage. The Geek is not going to win this war of words.

    15. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0

      Err ... that's counterfeiting.

      Subtle difference, but an important one.
      Yes, one is what carpenters do and the other is what commercial pirates do. Very subtle.
    16. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by bdonalds · · Score: 1

      "Ditto for your punctuation. The possessive form of it does not take an apostrophe any more than yours or hers" Doh! Ya got me! IT'S one of my pet peeves to boot! ...or should that be peeve's... :)

      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
    17. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

      Please. Do you "correct" people why they say they're gay, too? Tell them that "gay" means "happy" not "homosexual?" I tend to cringe when people say "languages evolve, deal with it" but this ["piracy"] really is one of those cases...

    18. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by O'Laochdha · · Score: 1

      Actually, I meant that as a joke; I have no f'ing clue how it wound up with an "informative" modifier.

    19. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not intellectual property infingement, it's copyright infringement. See this.

    20. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

      Ah, sorry. The suggestive powers of comment moderation are hard to resist!

    21. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      "it's defition" is a troll, right?

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
    22. Re:Counterfitting != Piracy by themelv · · Score: 1

      What if a pirate did his plundein', then sold the booty?

  18. China??? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    What about the NYC subway? That's where I... um, that's where I see a lot of people buying screeners.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  19. Please make the most important division by Cybert4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pirating for money is a far different thing than copying for free. That includes Pirate Bay, as they seem to have ads on their site. I have a real problem with people copying music/games/etc and selling it. If they choose to put it up for free--I have a lot less of a problem with that.

    1. Re:Please make the most important division by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no ads on TPB.. you must have had your browser hijacked and are infested with adware.

    2. Re:Please make the most important division by killeroffoil · · Score: 1

      Yeah people who give it away for free are more like modern day Robin Hoods, stealing from the rich and giving to the nerdy. Although I wonder if any of these would be Robin Hoods have a Maid Marion as well.

  20. Still up by Psykosys · · Score: 1

    *checks favorite Chinese "freeware" site* Sweet.

  21. In other news... by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ebay, announces the cancelation of 537,000 auctions for "genuine" dvds by the seller for "item no longer available"

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:In other news... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "seller no longer available."

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  22. nah by Cybert4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Counterfitting is passing it off as genuine. If the customers knows it is copied and still buys it--that's just for-profit piracy.

  23. Movie companies care about dollars, not politics by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Movie companies, software companies etc, are more interested in dollars than some cold-war era politics. So you can't sell to them legally now? So what! In a few years things will likely soften and you'll be able to sell movies etc to China. When that happens you don't want a strong culture of copying. Besides, by ganging up with the regime, you're more likely to get a softened response and get the markets going sooner rather than later.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  24. Alternative work programs? by cwgmpls · · Score: 1

    So what is the plan to provide daily subsistance to the millions of people who rely on selling pirated disks for buck or two on the street? Millions of people have found a sustainable enterprise by re-selling the popular songs and movies that flood the world, and they rely on it for their daily food and shelter. If this enterprise is taken away, what alternatives are there for these people to survive?

    1. Re:Alternative work programs? by Lorean · · Score: 1

      Um, try honest work?

    2. Re:Alternative work programs? by cwgmpls · · Score: 1

      That was my question. Given the alternatives for survival on the city streets of the 3rd world, reselling music seems more honest and harmless than all of the alternatives that I can think of. The vendor has something that the customer wants, the customer can't afford to buy it in any other way, nobody is harmed of loses anything. Seems like true free enterprise to me, and not much more sleazy than the tactics of these large corporations that are making a big fuss about it.

      Maybe it is time for the recording industry to come up with an honest and viable business plan of their own, rather than planning to monopolize and profit from global culture on the backs of anyone who enjoys music and movies. Who owns the global culture anyway?

      I'm all for finding alternatives to selling pirated music. That was what I was asking for. I just can't think of any that scale as well and help as many people as this enterprise does.

    3. Re:Alternative work programs? by Lorean · · Score: 1

      Wait. So you're telling me that in the fastest growing economy in the world one cannot find honest work? How does this enterprise help anyone? Who do you think runs and owns the printing and burning presses? Don't you think the economy would benifit more with street vendors building infrastructure rather than selling candy?

    4. Re:Alternative work programs? by cwgmpls · · Score: 1

      The capacity to quickly duplicate, distribute, and use digital files, whether music, movies, or software, seems to me quite a valuable infrastructure to build in the 21st century. Almost all of the IT infrastructure in the 3rd world -- whether for entertainment or commerce -- is being built with pirated (or free) software -- especially if you are talking about that "last mile" to the consumer's home.

      Free and/or pirated information, whether music, movies, or software, is the very thing that enables the build-out of IT infrastructure into the 3rd world. Efforts like these are only aimed at protecting the monopoly of an established business, not fostering the development of new enterprise.

    5. Re:Alternative work programs? by cwgmpls · · Score: 1

      Most of them were farmers selling their produce locally, until the globalization of the food market made that business unprofitable. Global food distributers refuse to buy their produce for more than it costs them to produce it because it can be imported cheaper from somewhere else. So now they are trying to bootstrap themselves into a new industry, which is exactly what the developed nations tell them tell them they should do when they can't compete in the global food market.

    6. Re:Alternative work programs? by mutsu · · Score: 1

      This has to be a troll, you make it sound like they have a right to do this.

      I may not necessarily agree with how the IP laws are being created and enforced (read RIAA here, they really need to get a new bussiness model. Then again, I won't miss them when they crash and burn because someone else beats them to it.) but that does NOT give these people free license to do this.

      These "millions" of people need to get out and (for lack of better wording) GET A JOB!

      Yes, sometimes working for someone else stinks, but "get rich quick schemes" == "ticket to jail fast" in these cases.

    7. Re:Alternative work programs? by cwgmpls · · Score: 1

      Actually, any illegal immigrant on a payroll is getting taxes withheld, just like you and me. Unless, of course, they are working off the books for cash. But you can't tell me that illegal immmigrants are the only ones guilty of that practice. And the irony is they don't qualify for any of the benefits their payroll taxes are paying for (like Social Security). As things are now, it is a pretty clear-cut case of taxation without representation. Illegals are taxed the same as you and me but they don't have government representation.

      If the illegal aliens want to be a part of the US they have to play by the rules of the US

      Fair enough. Show them the rules for becomming a U.S. citizen and I'm sure they would comply. The fact is there is no legitimate way for them to become U.S. citizens. With the current system, the chance of them getting accepted to legally work in the U.S. if they apply to the U.S. government is zero. How can you insist that people follow rules when there is no rule that will allow them to work in the U.S. legally?

    8. Re:Alternative work programs? by cwgmpls · · Score: 1
      This has to be a troll, you make it sound like they have a right to do this.

      Maybe it depends on whether or not you think a person has a right to eat.

      These "millions" of people need to get out and (for lack of better wording) GET A JOB!

      Have you ever been on a city street in the 3rd world? It's not like you can just fill out a job application at KFC or something. My original post is asking what options there are for alternative work. Obviously, getting a different job would be ideal; the difficult question is: What job?

  25. Sonmay? by Pengunea · · Score: 1

    Do any of these raided companies include Sonmay?

    On one hand I'd like to see Sonmay go down because it takes away profits from legal retailers by making the packaging look similar to a legit copy. On othe other hand, where am I supposed to get copies of the long out-of-print Orchestral Game Concert CDs now?

    --
    Starkle, starkle, little twink.
    1. Re:Sonmay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sonmay (and I think most of the other CD bootleggers) is in Taiwan, not mainland.

  26. The Backstroke of the West by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    Yeah, where will I find my copy of Star War The Third Gathers: The Backstroke of the West? Enjoy screen shots here.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  27. Re:100 0 by kentrel · · Score: 1

    If 1 billion people actually paid for their software, music, games etc just think of how many more jobs that would create in the West. Not quite sure why you're on the side of 0day. If nobody pays for someone elses hard work, what have they done to deserve keeping it?

  28. Very old news by �!� · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks to me like TechFreep doesn't deserve to be slashdotted.
    The article they are referring to was last updated on 2006-02-06! Which also means TechFreep edited the story considerably to add mention of recent dates. They even used the same Febuary photo.
    Therefore I would not be trusting any information from this source.

  29. Only on SlashDot: "China Daily"=reliable source by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Only on SlashDot: "China Daily"=reliable source. Notice the "*.cn" extension; if you buy the crackdown, I know a rich, recently widowed friend in the Congo who needs your help. (Also, any time you see a "100-day" anything, that's a clear sign that it's pure PR.)

    1. Re:Only on SlashDot: "China Daily"=reliable source by �!� · · Score: 1

      In this case it is TechFreep which is the unreliable source. Notice that the original article doesnt mention the 100 day thing and also is actually from Feb 2006. They even used the same photo.

  30. woohoo! 13 million! by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    Only 987.000.000 to go!

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  31. Re:Movie companies care about dollars, not politic by donatj · · Score: 0

    Charging $15.99+ for movies though, only the richest of chinese would even be able to afford movies, when the average yearly income is $800

  32. china police smoking weed agina? by shareme · · Score: 1

    537,000 markets raided but they only came up with 10,000 shops to raid? Who is lying here? or maybe we should ask why BSA's biggest office is not in China?

    --
    Fred Grott(aka shareme) http://mobilebytes.wordpress.com
    1. Re:china police smoking weed agina? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Because the BSA is an American organization?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  33. Yeah, yeah... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

    "...government officials have closed down 8,907 shops and street vendors, 481 publishing companies and 942 illegal websites."

    Sure they closed them now, but in a few days they will be back at their old tricks, albiet under new management. I bet you my entire collection of bootleg anime that a well placed bribe or the guaranteed employment of some politician's or magnate's mongoloid cousin will earn these pirates a clean bill of health from said "government officials."

    Remember that this is a nation that won't let it's districts/states perform their own productivity audits because they tie the magistrate's pay to economic performance. Needless to say that when they did allow these provinces to do their own evaluations they made Arthur Anderson's accounting practices seem conservative. The last year that they did it the national aggregate GDP was several points higher thant he official numbers from the central accounting office. WOW!

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  34. Off with the old.. by pickyouupatnine · · Score: 1

    .. versions and on to upgrade all the shops to the latest version of pirated software ;)

    --
    _Vishal www.squad9.com
  35. One question? by eclectro · · Score: 1


    Does this mean that my chinese source for windows XP might go from $10 USD to $15 USD?

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:One question? by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 1
      No, I was in a major market yesterday. MS Office and Photoshop cs (along with all other software) were still priced at 10 Yuan. At current rates, 1 USD = about 8 Yuan. A meal at KFC costs about 20 Yuan. However, a meal at a non-western restraunt costs about 3-5 Yuan and a typical family makes about 1000-2000 yuan per month.

      So, the software is still available at very low cost. I am not much of a game player (I have long since given up on most computer games, they are just too hard and I can never finish them); however, I also looked at the price on the games, half life and some others, they are also all 10 Yuan. Now if I can just get a printer at a reasonable cost, I will be set.

  36. Oh! by east+coast · · Score: 1

    So that's what happened to the 12,999,999 copies of Gigli for HD-DVD!

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  37. Great! by bendodge · · Score: 0

    Much as I don't like it myself, it is a good thing. Thieving needs to stop.

    --
    The government can't save you.
  38. Re:100 0 by webrunner · · Score: 1

    100 is clearly a larger number than 0, that's all I'm saying.

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
  39. Re:Movie companies care about dollars, not politic by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    when the average yearly income is $800

    Hey, according to Sony that's no excuse.

    They should just work longer hours even if it means getting another job.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  40. It just doesnt matter at all by EGC · · Score: 1

    let me bring u guys some insight of this crap as a chinese its purely a show, and thats it no one buys this discs anyway. the main consumers of intellctual property in china are aged between 15 - 35, and for these ppl, as long as they hv broadband access, they know how to load up their harddisc with p0rns frm da internet. watching japanese av frm a disc was so old school ... jst some rural ppl mite still doing that.

  41. i wonder.. by Brian-esser.com · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it has anything to do with the US.EU and others filing a suit against China for unfair trade balance and trade practices. USA Today had a story about it yesterday.

    --
    http://bi-bri.com The R.I.A.A can chew me..
  42. Re:But Remember Kids... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
    File Share'ers are the REAL evil villans!


    Even Lars Ulrich knows it's wrong!
  43. When asked for comment... by fr175 · · Score: 1

    "Arrrr, me disks!"

  44. another raid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another raid...

    If you haven't noticed the police in china regulary does raides in china.

    Usually prostitution have been the prime target since it have been a problem through out the country since the 90's. But other types of crimes, of wide dispersion can be targeted, the most unusual i've experienced is the act of crossing the street...but.. it was never successful ;-) however, even though the police targets crimes, the goverment program of "cleaning up" regions is the main act that should be discussed. "cleaning up" would mean rebuilding about a 1/3 of a region (consider that a region keeps from 4 to 30 mil. people), this usually causes problems and can be seen as the major task of the police.

    Basically, that is the only task of the police, keeping the calm when rebuilding. Contrary to western belief, this isn't done by force but by replacing the standard force with uncorrupted officers that files, and keeps a steady eye on all disturbances happening on *all* streets.
    Removing prostitution, illegal street sales, like crapy CD's is just a welcomed side effect.

    That said, the effect of the "raids" are generally weaker then the economically forces. Prostitution in shanghai have never declined and sales in beijing keeps a steady going, but in this case a real change have been seen and i would guess it will keep a decline in illegal cd sales in up to 5 years, that's the effect of the tough penalties..

  45. In unrelated news... by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

    In unrelated news, Chinese P2P traffic and writable CD/DVD sales both sky-rocket.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  46. The Price of Slavery by twitter · · Score: 1

    Book burnings are never a good sign. This is a deal between thieves and is hollow throughout. From the Article:

    "If piracy can be controlled and more customers purchase our copyrighted products, we can provide more of these products for cheaper prices in return in the future," said Feng Hongtao, manager of Dongke Audio and Video Chain Store.

    Translation: If you let us own your culture, despite all previous behavior and evidence to the contrary, we promise to be nice and sell it to you cheap.

    You:

    It is suicidal for America to not tie very strong IP enforcement to its trade agreements with countries like China. Most of what we produce domestically is IP from music to code to drug designs. We are at an inherent disadvantage then, if we allow them to dump tens of billions of dollars of cheap crap in our stores, but allow their locals to run wild with our IP. ... If you want to reduce our dependency on IP and strong foreign IP laws, go start a manufacturing business that produces in America at rates that can replace China and Taiwan.

    Any trade with China is immoral, impractical and threatens our freedom. It is impractical to compete with slave labor, which is what China has to offer. It is immoral and impractical to support trade which destroys your own free industrial base. It is further impractical to expect co-operation from leaders who enslave their own people. The more dependent we are, the more power they have. Unless the free nations agree that it's wrong to help China's leaders, we will all end up like China's people. Finally, there is no greater threat to your freedom than embracing "strong IP laws" as a substitute for moral government.

    There is no such thing as IP and general statements are meaningless. To make sense, you must address the real issues of trademark, copyright and patents. The general urge to strengthen IP laws has given us disastrous legislation which has outlawed legitimate domestic competition. Even if China was free, their abuse of patents and trademark would put us at a tremendous disadvantage. Factories in China will continue to disregard patents and violate trademarks at peak efficiency because they have no respect for such things to begin with. This little DVD burning show only punishes the people forced to work in those factories who won't be able to afford US and European entertainment for a while because their masters don't pay them well enough. Copyright enforcement will not effect the balance of trade and can do more harm than good by eliminating a press that was reproducing US propaganda outside of government control.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  47. Pirate Bay is not pirating any content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the users of Pirate Bay who are pirating content.

    Pirate Bay itself is just telling the users where they might look to get some content to pirate, which (so far) is not illegal in Sweden.

  48. 13 million discs.... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1
    ...and about an hour later you find yourself hungry for more pirated material.

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  49. Pffft by canadiangoose · · Score: 1

    You don't like to pedantic? On Slashdot? C'mon man, sure you do! It's fun!

    --
    Never eat more than you can lift -- Miss Piggy
    1. Re:Pffft by bdonalds · · Score: 1

      Crap, I'm busted!! But I don't LIKE to like to be pedantic! :) As long as I am here correcting a spelling mistake, maybe I should make a joke about tubes or bitching that Webster's has a monopoly or something...

      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
  50. Seize discs? Seize the day. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If China is seizing illegal CDs, maybe you should seize the day and have an adventure in Israel this winter... free. And unlike pirated discs, this is a perfectly legal way to have a great time. Taglit-birthright israel with Sachlav Educational Experience. Registration is right NOW, and will close in less than a week. If you're eligible (click the link to find out), you can have an amazing and uplifting experience in Israel this winter, instead of downloading MP3s and breaking the law. Hey, this post ain't offtopic: I used the words "China" and "CDs" in this post, not to mention that I talked about MP3s, all of which are definitely technical subjects that belong in this thread. Heh heh heh...

  51. Compact Disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the picture from the article, now I understand why they call it "Compact" Disk ;-)

  52. Re:High? Maybe Because It Has Another Use? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    Speak out against the government and have your apartment ransacked for pirated DVDs. They find them everytime and you don't have to worry about a trial -- you were ready to distribute them! Makes the government look good and invites companies to come to China. Win-win situation for the government!

    Hell, consider the numbers. 550 thousand distributors, 13 million discs. That makes each bootlegger selling what, 25 discs?

    Sounds more like they raided everyone and just picked up the ones that were making trouble or that had tried to search for freedom on the internet.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  53. more bodies by bleppie · · Score: 1

    gotta wonder if we'll see these street vendors at the next Body Worlds exhibit ;( http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?story Id=5553329

  54. communism and us copyrights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a communist society, what is the benefit of protecting another governments copyright business model, and businesses?

  55. One upon a time . . . by boyfaceddog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An American manufacturer copied the design of a loom from an English company and started producing wool. Others stole the design and pretty soon the American wool industry was booming. Why? Was American wool that much better? Could we produce more wool?

    No on both counts. We did it cheaper and had a domestic market that couldn't afford anything but US made wool. What was exported was STILL cheaper than English wool. British wool was driven into a niche of "high quality" while Americans got rich on low-cost goods.

    Moral? High Quality is the last refuge of the losing side.

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
    1. Re:One upon a time . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Moral? High Quality is the last refuge of the losing side."

      kind if like Apple computers then?

      *note: sometimes morals do not hold true for all people/places/ things (guess I could have used nouns)

  56. Re:Counterfitting != Counterfeitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All in the subject.

  57. Just wait... by olrik666 · · Score: 1

    "The Chinese government is waging a 100-day battle against software and media piracy"

    1) Wait 100 days
    2) Become a "pirate"
    3) ...
    4) Profit!

    Olrik

  58. Discount by pr0nbot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sweet! I guess this means that software will become much cheaper because the corporations won't be losing money in lost sales due to piracy!

    Right?

    1. Re:Discount by woztheproblem · · Score: 1

      No. Corporations maximize profits independently across separated markets. The profit or loss taken in one market should have no effect on pricing in another market. (assuming it is difficult to transfer goods between these markets)

  59. Re:High? Maybe Because It Has Another Use? by Deanalator · · Score: 1

    Is one in every thousand Chinese citizens a spammer?

    I could easily believe that there are a million comprimised machines that are being used as spam relays. If they actually knew where the person who was running the spam network lived, they would get raided, not an email.

  60. For profit piracy.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Should be shut down.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  61. aha Explains why my friends ebay dvd's dont play! by sjwest · · Score: 1

    Well they looked genuine but had nothing on them. The chinese ebayers yahoo email account was dead too Ebay will be getting some bad press soon.

  62. This be rather appropriate by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Today being International Talk Like A Pirate Day, ya bunch o' scallywags.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  63. How will we stop Global Warming at this rate? by unicode · · Score: 0

    Argghh...It be a said day when me Maties have thier booty plundered......Weigh anchor, there be Scervy sea dogs Ahoy.
    Shiver me timbers, Kyoto will not be enoguh to stop global warmin at this rate Matey. You can join us or walk the plank.

  64. I feel sorry by Britz · · Score: 1

    for all the poor chaps that didn't pay up and got busted. I guess it helps if you know someone working for the police.

  65. Re:100 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If 1 billion people actually paid for their software, music, games etc just think of how many more jobs that would create in the West.

    None.

    Here's why:

    For damn near zero marginal cost, they can sell the same damn thing over and over again. That means huge bonuses for management and then they streamline the process a bit more and fire a few more employees.

    Yet another vulnerability in the house of cards that is IP a previous poster mentioned.

  66. The joy of Beijing Olympics by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    I would hate to be doing anything tolerated but illegal in 2007. They are going to be cracking down on anything that might make them look bad in 2008. Just wait for 2009 and everything will be back to normal.

  67. Hilarity by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    Like in Vietnam, or Cuba, or Afghanistan, or Iraq, or...

  68. Sounds familiar by Tothalvadi · · Score: 2, Informative
    Stuff like this always makes me think of Pantip Plaza in Bangkok. It's a fairly large mall where they sell almost nothing else besides hardware and pirated software.

    Once in a while the police will raid the place to show that they're cracking down on the illegal software business. They will keep an eye on the place for a couple of weeks and after that just give up. After that, the vendors will just take up their usual spots again and it will be business as usual. It seems like this cycle just goes on every year with no real progress being made, and I have a feeling that it's the same in China.

    All those stores would be open again in a month, selling all their stuff like nothing has happened. It's just a publicity stunt and nothing else.

  69. The real reasons by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Here's some real reasons: 1) they don't own the enterprise doing the manufacture. 2) they aren't getting a big enough cut 3) they don't like people competing with their own operations. :-)

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  70. Pirate makeover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may not have noticed, but more recently Disney has been getting a pirate makeover. The Black Pearl was simply the beginning!

  71. If they were dogs, they'd be clubbed to death. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    At least these guys didn't get the treatement that everyone's puppies got...

    Read my posting here, where I detail how they clubbed 50,000 dogs to death... Sometimes in front of the owners as they were walking them.

    Until they do that to the pirates, they will always exist. And I don't think piracy is worthy of clubbing. :)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  72. Re:100 0 by kentrel · · Score: 1
    That's just the kind of twisted logic bullshit that keeps getting spewed on this site. More money for a company means more capital for new products, marketing, future investments and future developments (translation for the intellectually challenged: more jobs). That's how companies work for crying out loud. A company that puts all it's increased profits into bonuses for the management is a company that's out of business next year.

    All companies operate this way, it's a basic function of economics. Whether you're an entertainment company, a building contractor, or a car manufacturer, if you don't obey this incredibly simple principle, you're out of business next year.

    Why do people have such trouble with this? Is free stuff really worth looking like an idiot?