Slashdot Mirror


Optimus Mini Three OLED keyboard reviewed

Robbedoeske writes "The first Optimums Mini Three keyboards have been shipped to Holland and Tweakers.net managed to lay hands on one of them to review this precious gem." Apparently the drivers crash a lot, consume way to much CPU, the device is capable of only 3 frames per second, and the packaging makes the images look far more crisp than the actual device. And with a price tag of over $100, I'm scared to imagine what the price of a full keyboard will actually be should it ever actually ship. But it still would be neat.

192 comments

  1. Don't worry by tygerstripes · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is just the basic Optimus.

    There's more to the Prime edition than meets the eye.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
    1. Re:Don't worry by vaderhelmet · · Score: 1

      More Decepticon lies! The Optimus could never crash!

      Transformer jokes aside, this is pretty disappointing news. However, this is "new" technology and I think geeks everywhere have put a lot of hope into the possibilities this device opens up. Art Lebedev is more the design/creativity kind of place isn't it? Maybe if this got into the hands of some more experienced driver hackers they could clear up the driver issues. But I do think the CPU thing is obvious... You put graphics on anything and it has an noticeable effect on your resource utilization. Maybe they could be convinced to open source the drivers and let the community take a shot at it. Or do we think this is hardware limitation?

    2. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Or do we think this is hardware limitation?

      Per the article, the software is constantly updating the images to make sure they have the correct images, this is surely driving the CPU load higher than it needs to be

    3. Re:Don't worry by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe they could be convinced to open source the drivers and let the community take a shot at it. Or do we think this is hardware limitation?

      See here for hte docs and code. This is really an Alpha version, but rapidly evolving according to TFA.

    4. Re:Don't worry by rblancarte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then why not have some descent embedded controller built into the keyboard that controlled this? IE - the only real communication between the CPU and keyboard (outside of typing) is a refresh of what application is running. Then the keyboard micro-controller would be notified of the change and update the keys accordingly. Then the CPU doesn't even have to worry about what to display - just make sure that the keyboard is aware of current state. Heck, state changes like key-press (changing what the keys look like when you press ctrl or alt) wouldn't even touch the CPU - they would be known about by the controller, and it could modify they keys accordingly.

      To me, this is a very cheap way to make the keyboard much more effecient, yet not raise the cost much at all ($10-20 max).

      RonB

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    5. Re:Don't worry by rblancarte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BTW - the above statement is made without knowing the innards of this thing - they may already be doing this, so if they are - then CPU problems are really only a driver thing.

      RonB

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
  2. Any Key by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one who wants to make a driver hack for the Optimus so that when the computer says, "Press any key to continue" that there actually IS an Any key?

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    1. Re:Any Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Am I the only one ...

      yes

    2. Re:Any Key by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1
      It might take so many CPU cycles that the keyboard detect would timeout, so all we would have is:

      Keyboard not found. Press any key to continue.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Any Key by Itsacon · · Score: 1

      I'm more looking forward to implementing a `Fuck it' key...

      --
      I take life with a grain of salt...a slice of lemon and a dash of tequila
    4. Re:Any Key by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      This keyboard allows quick access to the three most commonly used keys; "Ctrl", "Alt" and "Delete". I just wonder whether the design is rugged enough to last a full week of Windows use.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:Any Key by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh. If you do, you should enable mapping it to every key. No more agonizing decisions over "OK" or "Cancel": just "Fuck it".

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    6. Re:Any Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't wait until some spyware company hacks the drivers so that the keyboard flashes a Punch the Monkey ad every so often. Or better yet, somebody recreates that smack the gopher game with a hammer using the keys.

    7. Re:Any Key by non · · Score: 1

      at that point shouldn't they all say 'any'?

      --
      ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
    8. Re:Any Key by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Yes, definitely - and this should be displayed on every key! lol

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    9. Re:Any Key by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one ...

      yes

      No. Except who uses DOS anymore?

      But I might make an Enter key clone called Return, just for old-times sake.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    10. Re:Any Key by green1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      memories from the old DOS days....

      2 ways I saw of dealing with this stuff that were well done...

      instead of "press any key to continue" pk-software (surely you remember pk-zip) used "press a key to continue" which meant that anyone with a brain would hit whatever they wanted, but those clueless types could press "a" and everything would be fine.

      the second one was a keyboard I used to have, the main enter key was labelled "enter" but the one on the numeric keypad was labelled "return" (or vice-versa I can't remember) meaning that no matter which term a programmer had chosed to use, the user would find it written on the keyboard...

      both of these were very simple solutions to this age old problem, I never understood why those practices didn't catch on...

    11. Re:Any Key by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      "press a/any key
      except shift, ctrl, caps lock, scroll lock, alt, alt gr, SysReq, Break and Pause"

      just aint so snappy

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    12. Re:Any Key by MrNonchalant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's one of the features already.

      http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/optimus-mini/ presentation/

      Go there and click Any.

    13. Re:Any Key by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      Sir, your post deserves some +informative and +funny. Thank you for making my dreams come true.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    14. Re:Any Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the second one was a keyboard I used to have, the main enter key was labelled "enter" but the one on the numeric keypad was labelled "return" (or vice-versa I can't remember) meaning that no matter which term a programmer had chosed to use, the user would find it written on the keyboard...

      Apple keyboards are like that.

    15. Re:Any Key by faolan_devyn_aodfin · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of that old joke from "The Simpsons" where Homer is setting at a computer and it displays "Hit any key to continue..." and Homer suddenly freaks out and screams "OH MY GOD! THERE IS NO 'ANY' KEY!" Freaking hilarious man.

      --
      Pagan? Geek? Check out #paganism on Freenode IRC
    16. Re:Any Key by Tombstone-f · · Score: 1

      They can also have 2 separate functions, such as in a dialogue box with a multi-line text box. The return key (grouped with the letters) will simply add a new line in the text box, but the enter key (on the number pad) will select the default response for the dialogue box.

  3. Packaging? by conigs · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...and the packaging makes the images look far more crisp than the actual device.

    I am shocked... shocked I tell you to learn that the image on the package looks better than the actual device. How could this possibly have happened? Who would dream of such a thing?

    Onto the device itself. I'm glad to see it develop and that it's more than just a concept. The technology is still in its infancy and it will take time for it to improve and come down to an affordable level. I'm looking forward to the day I can get a full keyboard like this.

    --
    Slashdot: where repeating an article in a post is "+5 Insightful"
    1. Re:Packaging? by cyclomedia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the full keyboard it'd probably be better to use some kind of e-paper like system, you get the black and white contrast of your normal keys combined with the instant ability to switch languages or to FPS mode, albeit the latter with 4-shade greyscale icons. Color for the sake of color on such a small device seems pointless to me*

      *disclaimer: my PDA is about 6 years old, has 8mb ram, supports 16 shades of grey and a small but usable keyboard that you can actually type on, so i'm hardly the ultra techy geek to be commenting on this sort of thing :-)

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    2. Re:Packaging? by jacobw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed. Anybody want to take bets on how long it takes to go from "buggy, overpriced, and useless" to "cheap and indispensable"? I'm betting 5 years, max.

      Of course, when it becomes ubiquitious, there will be certain downsides. You think the "zap the mosquito" ad is annoying now?

      Wait until the mosquito starts buzzing around your keyboard.

    3. Re:Packaging? by Forseti · · Score: 1
      For the full keyboard it'd probably be better to use some kind of e-paper like system

      If I remember correctly their FAQ states that, rather than color, they chose OLED over e-paper because current e-paper technology is way too slow.

      --
      Delay is preferable to error. (Thomas Jefferson)
    4. Re:Packaging? by oc255 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see your point of "ads everywhere", however I'm going to stay optimistic here. So let's say they ship a utility that lets you manage this spiffy new keyboard. It might look like a 3rd party mouse control panel, N52 gamepad, Palm Sync app. I doubt very much that it would allow automatic flash .swf syncing, not to mention a flash player engine on the keyboard itself.

      Allow if it did, someone would write adblock to block the ads or TiVo for keyboards to skip the ads using magical time-shifting techniques.

      Leela: "Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?"
      Fry: "Not in our dreams! Only on TV and radio. And in magazines. And movies. And at ballgames. And on buses. And milk cartons. And t-shirts. And bananas. And written on the sky. But not in dreams! No sirree!"

      That will be next. An OLED dreamcatcher from Optimus that you hang on your bed, bluetooth enabled for maximum R.E.M. product placement bandwidth to the OBEY chip in your skull.

    5. Re:Packaging? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Excuse me? Too slow? How often, exactly, do they think people actually need to change their keymap? Most of the time I use a UK layout. For some things I prefer a US layout. I have a French friend who would like to be able to switch to a French layout when he uses my machine. When I hold down option, it would be nice to see the symbols for special characters appear. Some applications (not to mention games) that have complicated keymaps could also benefit.

      None of these applications require a switching time of much less than a second, and are real uses. OLED gives you the 'ooo, shiny' factor, but eInk would be a lot more practical use.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Packaging? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Color for the sake of color on such a small device seems pointless to me

      The thing is about colour in a user interface; if you don't notice it, it's doing it's job. Colour cues should be unconscious and subtle, instructing your mind of the widgets function without you having to think of it.

      Want to test this? Colour your "OK" option red and the cancel "green". See how many people it confuses.

    7. Re:Packaging? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly their FAQ states that, rather than color, they chose OLED over e-paper because current e-paper technology is way too slow.

      Yes, only OLED technology allows them to achieve dazzling frame rates of 3 FPS.

      I'm dumbfounded as to why they're shooting for the moon right out the game by trying to build devices with color OLEDs on every key. That's complicated and it's expensive -- save it for a later revision.

      If they had done a first-pass design that used, say, 8x8 1-bit LCD matrices on the keys, we might actually have full 101-key keyboards with this technology by now, instead of flaky novelty USB devices.

    8. Re:Packaging? by Forseti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's their explanation, not mine. Besides, I think they wanted animated key icons to be a selling point, which certainly falls into the "Ooo shiny!" category. Though you have to admit, if it works, it's pretty cool!

      --
      Delay is preferable to error. (Thomas Jefferson)
    9. Re:Packaging? by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Do you even remember how ugly an 8x8 dot matrix font looks? Or remember the low visibility of a non-backlit LCD? It might work for a cheap prototype, but would anybody want to buy it?

    10. Re:Packaging? by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or label the cancel button on your controller O and the confirm button X...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:Packaging? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Color for the sake of color on such a small device seems pointless to me

      Colour is a good way to do groupings of keys into categories. I'm thinking of the keyboard for Avid in particular. Maybe you could go halfway and put greyscale LCDs on the tops of the keys, and have the sides be translucent white with a variable-colour LED inside? I don't know if that would be significantly cheaper in the end, though.

      I think it will be at least 5 years before this technology is genuinely affordable in a consumer keyboard, but it will be cool when it is. I've wanted to have one since the early 90s, when I dreamed up something very similar to the full Optimus concept.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    12. Re:Packaging? by mattxmayhem · · Score: 1

      that wouldn't affect anybody who has ever used a playstation.

    13. Re:Packaging? by operagost · · Score: 1

      It won't confuse color blind people.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    14. Re:Packaging? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The Playstation is what I'm talking about. I don't know why Sony thought that would be a good idea, in Japan all Playstation games use O for confirm and X for cancel, for some reason SCEA changed that around and now X confirms and O or /\ cancels, depending on the game. Really WHY? Why change a sensible default into something else and not even manage to set up a convention for which button cancels???

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    15. Re:Packaging? by mattxmayhem · · Score: 1

      it's just the location of the X button. It's not a big deal whatsoever.

    16. Re:Packaging? by alchemy101 · · Score: 1

      Because in Japan a circle denotes 'correct' or an affirmative whereas a Cross or X denotes incorrect or negative. It's even like that on test papers and exams.

    17. Re:Packaging? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      And? Why change it?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    18. Re:Packaging? by makomk · · Score: 1

      Because in Japan a circle denotes 'correct' or an affirmative whereas a Cross or X denotes incorrect or negative. It's even like that on test papers and exams. And in the UK (and presumably the US too) a cross on test papers or exams (or pop-up dialogs in programs, for those few that bother putting ticks and crosses on their buttons) still denotes incorrect or negative. (Though I think most formal exams use a 0 (for "zero marks", I assume) instead - that symbiology isn't used outside of tests, though.) If you click on the little cross in the top right-hand corner of an OK/Cancel dialog, generally it's equivalent to clicking Cancel. I don't think a circle has any particular association in this context, so it doesn't matter what it's assigned to...

  4. wrapup by camusflage · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's buggy, slow, fraudulently packaged, consumes an inordinate amount of your CPU, has been delayed many times, delivers on only a fraction of its originally advertised functionality, and is extremely expensive.

    Has someone let Steve Ballmer know that Optimus has stolen Microsoft's marketing plan?????

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    1. Re:wrapup by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      I know it's a joke, but I have a basic MS keyboard (it still has a PS2 conector) and I can tell you I have no will to exchange it for one of those oled gadget, even for free.

    2. Re:wrapup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's buggy, slow, fraudulently packaged, consumes an inordinate amount of your CPU, has been delayed many times, delivers on only a fraction of its originally advertised functionality, and is extremely expensive.

      Other than the "expensive" part, doesn't a large number of software v1.0 "shipped" fall into this category, including FOSS? Large "ha,ha" and fanboy points I guess to diss M$. Hell, look at most of the video games out there and tell me they don't esp. fall into this category.

    3. Re:wrapup by jftitan · · Score: 1

      Your kidding me... I've encountered software on Ver 10.98 to be horribly buggy. The company I worked for purchased a Point of Sales software package (NEW) and they sent us 10.98, I figured, heck it works, right! Well after 3 to 4 weeks of tinkering, and trying to get the damn thing to work correctly (Database syntax issues), finally after multiple calls to tech support, I find out our version 10.98 was WAY old. (3 months old), and they had a patch to ver 11.045.

      I'm not going to name names... but rpe SUCKS. (until ver 11.045) but even still... there are probably a million more syntax issues between database, and cc transaction software that it's supposed to support.

      (my 2 cents)

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    4. Re:wrapup by orasio · · Score: 1

      Free software gets to 1.0 when it mostly works, not when it's a bag of bugs.
      Firefox 1.0 did work.
      Mozilla 1.0 did work better than IE 4 or 5.
      OpenOffice 1.0 didn't work _that_ great, but 2.0 is way more stable than comparable proprietary software at versions 4 or 5 (office97, I believe)

      Usually, free software developers are more humble when numbering their versions.

    5. Re:wrapup by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Damn straight, it took the mplayer devs years to get to 1.0 and a year after 1.07prexx they release 1.08. The mythtv devs are even more conservative, they've been doing mythtv for what, 3 or so years and are just now hitting .20.

        But like they say, let an engineer build an engine and it'll never be finished. Perfectionists, the lot of them.

    6. Re:wrapup by Amani576 · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean man... people get on me for having my loud-ass IBM Model M Keyboard without windows keys... I wouldn't trade it for anything in the world... and yes... it is a PS/2 style as well, I love it to death, and it's the best keyboard I've ever used.

      --
      "Paranoia is the flaw and gift of man. Heed its advice, but do not live by its will."
    7. Re:wrapup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Damn straight, it took the mplayer devs years to get to 1.0 and a year after 1.07prexx they release 1.08.

      Actually their latest release is 1.0pre8. So it's a 1.0 pre version.
      But there might be a 1.0 RC in a few weeks.
    8. Re:wrapup by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      PC Anywhere version 10 was probably the worst main-stream "mature" software product I've ever seen.

    9. Re:wrapup by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Word 2.0 for DOS was rock solid.

      run it on MSDos 3.3 and you would NEVER see a crash.

      Ah, them was the days.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  5. Intresting.... but... by strredwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read through the article, and it looked like just a normal embedded chip with extra RAM hooked in for the displays. I wouldn't be suprized if the extra CPU on the PC is used to refresh the displays often.

    Ugh.

    I think a OLED full keyboard would be cool, but maybe if they used a double-USB device scheme it would be better: USB Keyboard and small USB storage for storing GIF files of each key.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Intresting.... but... by jacksonic · · Score: 1

      I believe the review means that the configuration software takes 50% of the CPU, not the drivers.

  6. It Shows Promise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's expensive and buggy... But it's a great proof-of-concept and can only improve from here.

    While I don't see much purpose for the 3 button model, I can't wait to see how the full keyboard performs and what sort of price we'll be looking at to purchase one.

    1. Re:It Shows Promise by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While I don't see much purpose for the 3 button model, I can't wait to see how the full keyboard performs and what sort of price we'll be looking at to purchase one.

      Three words, awesome case mod!

      But practical use? No, not really, it could good for switching between virtual desktops. In some type of emergency management system you could even have a key blink if its associated desktop has some emergency situation you need to attend to.

    2. Re:It Shows Promise by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      But practical use? No, not really

      Are you referring to the three key or the full keyboard? Because I agree that the three key is not really practical. But a full keyboard, now that would have some incredible uses. The first one that pops in my head is multilingual support. I'm constantly driven nuts by those little stickers all over my keyboard. Not to mention that the only indication of which language you're using under Windows is the small blue box in the corner.

      Given how buggy Windows is at switching languages (I can't count how many times I've changed the langauge, switched the window, then started typing only to find that Windows is using the previously selected language), having the keys on the keyboard change would greatly assist in knowing the currently selected language. Well, that and you can see which keys you're typing. ;-)
    3. Re:It Shows Promise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't see much purpose for the 3 button model

      Any kiosk or computer controlled device that's not manned by coders. Think of something like a large newspaper printer: instead of having a large console with dozens of tiny switches replace it with a couple of 3 button displays slapped on to the side of the unit. Then the operators can walk up and down and press a couple of buttons to do tasks. For example the color-related buttons wouldn't display when you're printing B&W jobs.

      Or for a dispatcher. In addition to her keyboard there's a 3 button display that shows up things based on the type of call she's getting. If the call comes from a fire station have buttons displayed that only relate to that type of emergency.

      There's a lot of uses, mainly for people that aren't used to dealing with computers and only need a very limited input device.

    4. Re:It Shows Promise by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Might be cheaper to rig up a reverse KVM, and just have separate keyboards for each language. Sure, it'd take up a lot of space, but it's not my desk... ;)

      Seriously, though, I think you're one of the few people who would really utilize this keyboard. I think for things like gaming, you'd be better off just getting a game-specific keyboard, and the same goes for most other task-specific arguments: if you don't have to actually change the keyboard on a regular basis, you just need different keycaps, you probably won't be able to justify the cost of one of these.

      Personally, I think they'd do well to focus on a standard keyboard and use the OLED buttons for the function keys. Those would change every time you switched applications, but there's no need to have every key re-labelable.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    5. Re:It Shows Promise by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Smaller versions of this would make for highly customizable kiosk. You wouldn't nessesarily need a full keyboard, though more than 3 keys would be nessesary. Say maybe 20. Of course I guess touch screen would probably be just as good.

    6. Re:It Shows Promise by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I know I saw an ad in a flying magazine once for pushbuttons that had something like a 32x32 fiber-optic matrix, which allowed them to have their labels changed. I can't seem to find a reference to them now, though, so maybe they weren't reliable (those pilots are kind of finicky about dependable avionics). They might have been good for a kiosk.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    7. Re:It Shows Promise by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Given how buggy Windows is at switching languages (I can't count how many times I've changed the langauge, switched the window, then started typing only to find that Windows is using the previously selected language), having the keys on the keyboard change would greatly assist in knowing the currently selected language. Well, that and you can see which keys you're typing. ;-)

      If you look down at the taskbar, you can see the two character locale ID. If not, got Regional and Language options in control pane and make sure "Show Language Bar" is checked. Minimise it and it will dock in the taskbar.

      Play with it, and you can see it's per process, and so "changing it and switching windows" will behave exactly the way you describe, every time.

      It's not buggy though, you just don't understand that the locale is a property of each process, not the whole system.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re:It Shows Promise by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      If you look down at the taskbar, you can see the two character locale ID.

      Methinks that would be the "small blue box" to which I was referring.

      Play with it, and you can see it's per process, and so "changing it and switching windows" will behave exactly the way you describe, every time.

      Except that it doesn't work that way. If I switch the language for a single window (let's say OpenOffice, for example), I'll usually type in the alternate language. That seems to hold to that window while I switch between them. But if I then go back to OpenOffice, change the language back to English, then change the window I've got focused, I'll usually find myself typing the alternate language again. So then I have to switch it for THAT window (which never had its language changed) at which point it will 'take' for the entire system.

      Drives me nuts.
    9. Re:It Shows Promise by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You said

      (I can't count how many times I've changed the langauge, switched the window, then started typing only to find that Windows is using the previously selected language)

      E.g.

      Start with Process A. Change the language in Process A to 2, switch to Process B. Process B should have whatever language it had before.

      This behaviour, the one that annoys you, is by design, because each process has its own locale.

      Works with all the stuff I've used, on all the machines, so it's unlikely to be a windows bug.

      Never tried Open Office though.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:It Shows Promise by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      That was a simplification of the problem. Basically, I get a different language than I was expecting because I had been previously using the language in another window. Even though that window had been changed back, the current window (which was never changed) is using the wrong language.

  7. dude.... virtual desktops! by nagashi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Imagine being able to use those to switch virtual desktops, and having an image of the virtual desktop on those keys! =O As a bonus side effect, that'll clear up a bit of room on the taskbar, which is a pretty big deal for me. I prefer to have as much room on my taskbar devoted to tasks and not other misc stuffs such as applets, a gigantic clock, or thumbnails of each desktop. I'm seriously getting twitchy about the prospect of this xDD

    1. Re:dude.... virtual desktops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd break my nails trying to drag a window from one workspace to another...

    2. Re:dude.... virtual desktops! by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      wow, that would be nice, though I'd want an 8-10 button model for that.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    3. Re:dude.... virtual desktops! by Square+Snow+Man · · Score: 1

      In Gnome you can hide all the bars and move around using CTRL+ALT+(arrow key indicating what direction to move), and you can drag windows in Gnome with the same trick but just hold SHIFT aswell.

    4. Re:dude.... virtual desktops! by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      Also, consider various gaming possibilities:

      RTS
      Assign a group of units to a button, and the button picture changes to, say, what the majority unit is in that group! Also, you could use the keyboard as a secondary output device, and reserve, say, the numpad for an overhead map. Hell, you could press a key on the numpad to go to that area of the map on the screen, cutting down on scroll time.

      FPS
      Buttons light up for various weapons as they become available, complete with updating ammo counts! Ok, not the most useful or original idea, as who is going to be looking at the keyboard during a deathmatch, but still...

      RPG
      Buttons blink when the special abilities they are linked to become active, complete with cooldown timers. Again, the number of available uses can show on the keys as well (reagents? mana pool/mana cost?). Your health potion button could start flashing when you *really* need one... many possibilities here.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    5. Re:dude.... virtual desktops! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The problem with using this in games is that you're going to have to look away from the screen to see what's on the keys, probably refocusing your eyes in the process. Do that a lot and you'll fatigue your eyes quickly. If you never do it then it's a big waste.

      The other problem with what you're suggesting is that such information is almost always on the screen anyway, so there is no point in putting it on the keyboard too.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:dude.... virtual desktops! by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      For the more screen-intensive games, I can see your point. FPS's are out then. However, for RTS especially, I can see this being useful.

      Imagine a game of Starcraft where you're playing, say, the Zerg, constantly throwing unit groups together and tossing them at your enemies defenses. It could be very useful to see which keys you've assigned to your expendable zerglings, and which keys are for your Ultralisks at a glance, without having to waste time flipping through the groups and seeing that oh, I assigned the Ultra's to group 8. Also, if it were possible to move the minimap off the screen and onto the keyboard, then you could free up more viewable area to see the battlefield.

      This kind of functionality, combined with Supreme Commander's built-in support for multiple monitors, could provide powerful tools for the armchair general.

      Your point about eye strain remains though... on one hand, refocusing your eyes more often can help prevent vision problems by keeping the focusing muscles strong (or so I've heard), but that's not something I'd want to deal with in the middle of a game. There's no real good solution to this I'm afraid. I'd be willing to give it a try at least.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    7. Re:dude.... virtual desktops! by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but...

      Does it run^H^H^Hhave Linux drivers?

      If not, it will be fun to see whether open source drivers are any better than the original ones.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    8. Re:dude.... virtual desktops! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      So instead of squinting at a tiny thumbnail on your taskbar, you squint at a tiny thumbnail on your keyboard. Terribly useful!

  8. "Gem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The author of this article is hereby banned from using the word "gem" ever again, except to describe a precious stone.

    1. Re:"Gem" by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 1

      What makes his use of "gem" (the term appears four times in the article) a little less annoying is that the English-language article we're reading is actually a translation of the original article which was written in German. I hope and assume "gem" is a poor translation for a much less annoying German word.

    2. Re:"Gem" by FST777 · · Score: 1

      That would be Dutch, not German.

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
  9. Slashdot stats in realtime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    check this out,
    This site can actually cope with a slashdoting pretty easily,

    Nevertheless its pretty cool to look at their stats and see the slashdotting take place:
    http://tweakers.net/stats

    Scroll down to "reviews" to see the major increase in traffic since a few minutes.

    1. Re:Slashdot stats in realtime! by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      "De MySQL server ligt te slapen..."

      You stand corrected, sir.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:Slashdot stats in realtime! by Bardsley · · Score: 1

      Hmm, the site seems to have been slashdotted to me...

    3. Re:Slashdot stats in realtime! by WoLpH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Translation: "The MySQL server is sleeping..."

      Simply put, the server can't take the enormous load of /.

    4. Re:Slashdot stats in realtime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually... there was a (partial) power failure in the data center where tweakers.net is hosted... and that resulted in a restart of the database server. And of course serving a /. with cold caches and while replaying logs is a bit harder than with hot caches ;)

    5. Re:Slashdot stats in realtime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hasnt been slashdotted, it has been poweroutaged ;)
      Just bad luck

    6. Re:Slashdot stats in realtime! by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      I read it as "Time to give the MySQL server a slap"!

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    7. Re:Slashdot stats in realtime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply put, the database server doesnt have any problem with ~10% more traffic, but has huge problems when it is out of power (a complete datacenter went down, see: http://www.ams-ix.net/technical/stats/ the dip at 16:00)

  10. What is the price? by jackharrer · · Score: 0

    I think that this beauty is a nice thing. We just need to wait for cheap chinese copy :)
    Or one greatly overpriced, but with additional special features (CTRL+Alt+Del in one button) MS version :)

    jackharrer

    --

    "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
  11. OLED for Monitor by in2mind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So we have OLED for keyboard?
    What actually happened to those predictions that OLED would soon replace LCD for monitors?? Is anything happening in the mainstream?

    1. Re:OLED for Monitor by norminator · · Score: 1

      OLED is just barely coming out for small-screen devices right now... devices which don't use up the lifetime of the OLEDs too quickly. Kodak had one model of camera with an OLED screen a couple of years ago, which I don't think ever made it to the US, and then I don't think there were any devices using OLEDs at all, until just now, there's finally some that are using them.

      OLED monitors would be awesome, and I think they're still going to get here eventually, but don't wait to replace your old dying CRT just for that. I did see a prototype 15" OLED monitor at the Sanyo booth at CES 2003, it was super-thin, and the picture was gorgeous. I hope that they do get around to the monitor market sooner than later.

    2. Re:OLED for Monitor by kahrytan · · Score: 1

      OLED Monitor would not be like a LCD monitor. LCD monitor will be large and bulky monitor compared to a OLED one.

      OLED monitor would hang on the wall like a movie screen would.
      OLED could quite possibily add computer screens on car windshields.

      I am glad that OLED has advanced far enough where it can display clear crisp images. Early forms only had few colors possible. It doesn't do HD images but it works.

      --
      \
    3. Re:OLED for Monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kodak had one model of camera with an OLED screen a couple of years ago, which I don't think ever made it to the US, and then I don't think there were any devices using OLEDs at all, until just now, there's finally some that are using them.

      Back in 2004 Sony released a model of the Clie (VZ90) that had an OLED screen. [3.8 inch, 16 bit color, half-VGA resolution] No US release for it, and it was actually the very last PDA of the Clie brand.

      The price of VZ-90 was $800. The screen must have cost something like $400 or $500, since the rest of the hardware was (if I'm not mistaken) comparable to PDAs from Palm, Dell, HP that cost around $400 or so.

  12. Breast keys by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you are watching porn is it possible to have a mini thumbnail of your video playback display on the keypad as well?

    This is a genuine question!

    1. Re:Breast keys by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Just buy a touchscreen monitor and a packet of screenwipes.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Breast keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to render your porn 3 frames per second, on a 96x96 pixel display, I don't see why not.

    3. Re:Breast keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least a breast key would be better than a clitoris key, because no man would ever be able to find that one.

  13. Finally, the perfect keyboard for Windows by eyal · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just configure the three keys as ctrl, alt, and delete.
    :)

  14. A default for Windows users... by cobrajs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...should be Ctrl, Alt, and Delete!

  15. ctrl-alt-del keyboard finally a reality by tendays · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I know a good use for that keyboard ...

    http://www.helldesk.dk/keyboard-ctrl-alt-del.jpg

  16. I don't get it? by Voltas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Other then "gadget factor" whats the real value in this?

    This reminds me of the "Tablet PC" revolution (I baught one). Although a great piece of technology there wasn't a significant increase in productivity or features that warented the extra effort to adapt to the technology.

    A big win for any "bleeding edge" technology is if the added productivity and features out way the effort to convert from an existing platform.

    Winning Examples:
    iPod (MP3 Player)
    Mouse -> Cordless Mouse
    Touchpad
    Cell Phone OS' (When a cellphone started doing more then dialing)
    PDA

    Losers:
    One-handed Keyboard
    Tablet PC
    OLED Keyboard

    If your average user has to change they're process and spend alot of time configuring with low return on the effort your user accaptance is going to be significantly reduces.

    Sure you can through any piece of technology in front of me and I'll play with it for a week or a month but if I can't adapt it to existing effort or it changes me to do things differantly then I'll put it down.

    --
    -- Disclaimer: I can't really back up anything I post on /. --
    1. Re:I don't get it? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      One-handed Keyboard

      I dont know to what special type of keyboard you are reffering but a) It is possible to write (fast!) with one hand in a normal keyboard (see Dvorak one handed keyboard). I have seen someone in action with that key distribution and it is amazing.

      Tablet PC

      You defin Tablet PC as a loser, however I think there has been a lot of maket for this computers. I would like to buy one, however they are quite expensive (and I am quite poor), maybe you did not liked it, and saw it as a gadget because you are a software developer or something similar. The reason is that it is not aimed to your kind of job. It is aimed to secretaries or people in supply chain management for example that need to take quick notes and verify manufacturing processes in real time (someone I know works on that). And of course it would be useful even to people that makes inventory (if you have a small/medium shop you might find it handy).

      OLED Keyboard

      Having said that I am a bit skeptical on this one. One of the main uses I give to this diplaying keyboard is to remap the letters when changing the keyboard distribution, it would be nice to play a Whack-a-mole like game. But if you see the "special function" keys use has been decreasing in current times. say for example F2, F9, F12, etc. HOWEVER I believe the approach of making an "additional" keyboard similar to those numerical keyboards you can connect to a computer. They surely would be used for specific tasks.

      I had to use one of these numerical pads in a program I made to my brother (veterinary) which he used to analyze some samples in the microscope and count some of the things there without looking outside the microscope. I used that and sound output. Neat uh? =o).

      The problem with that would be that, people already *know* the distribution of the numerical keyboard (and normal keyboard, kind of...) so had I had one of those keyboards and mapped my functions, it would be more difficult for my brother to learn the which key does what AND the position, instead of just learning the number and what it does.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:I don't get it? by Digicrat · · Score: 1

      Tablet PCs are great things, they just aren't for everybody (partly because the prices never came down). The same will be true of these keyboards, at least until they become dirt cheap.

      Tablets are used a lot in business' or hospitals for quick input without requiring a keyboard, to provide mobile surveys or display information, etc.

      I don't have one (can't afford it), but if I did it would come in very handy when using my laptop for taking notes in class - there's no faster way to quickly copy down a small diagram while the rest of your notes are mostly text.

      At the same time, tablet PCs and touchscreen displays are a more natural way for less tech-savvy persons to use the computer--I'm sure everyone here's been annoyed by someone at some point that insists on touching the screen to point something out.

      I think this OLED technology is still a ways off from mainstream usage on the PC - meaning until the price difference is equivalent to that of optical over standard mouse a few years ago.

      They are starting to use similar technology to this on programmable remote controls, which would be a lot more practical for simplifying large universal remote controls (my parents can never figure out how to use the TV+cable-DVR+sound-system+dvd)

    3. Re:I don't get it? by rblancarte · · Score: 1

      You know - you might not be far off.

      While this is a very great concept - it MIGHT call for a lot of user interaction (depending on how much work they do behind the scenes to provide good software support). I am kind of reminded of my Philips Pronto - which is a great universal remote for my home theater unit, but doesn't get a whole lot of use, because I have yet to finish programming it. Why? Pain. I have to lay out everything, and it isn't easy. I am sure I am not the only one with this issue.

      This could face a simlar issue.

      I would say - there is something to be said for simpler design. The iPod is the perfect example of this.

      RonB

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    4. Re:I don't get it? by Voltas · · Score: 1

      On-Handed Keyboard

      So true, I would never argue that a one handed keyboard would be faster and more erginomic. I saw this handle grip keyboard that utilized up to 3 key entries using swivle twist and finger griping. If i trained myself for months and months I would love this thing! but I'll never do it.

      Tablet PC

      Having owned one and looked from the outside in as well. You don't use the extending features of the tablet PC as much as you would think. In the end my utilization of the pen and the handwriting recognition was reduced to near zero. For hotpitals and "mobile" user I've professional designed systems around Tablet PC's but its a nitch, its not for the masses.

      OLED Keyboards

      Again, it will have its niches but mainstream technology that will change the way we work and play with our computer. Doubt it.

      --
      -- Disclaimer: I can't really back up anything I post on /. --
    5. Re:I don't get it? by multisync · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of the "Tablet PC" revolution (I baught one). Although a great piece of technology there wasn't a significant increase in productivity or features that warented the extra effort to adapt to the technology.


      Tablets actually do have their uses. My company is implimenting software for our estimators to use on the road. They are finding it cumbersome to use with their laptops, which are poorly suited for walking around jobsites trying to draw diagrams and enter data, all while holding a flashlight, tape measure, digital camera etc.

      The guys who use tablets are at least able to utilize the touch screen. It's a bit more like working with a clipboard and pen, so it also feels more natural to the more "experienced" guys, who are not that comfortable with computers. I think the same could be said of anyone who needs to work with a computer while moving about.

      So while I agree, there is probably no great demand for them from the average consumer, I think they do have their uses
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    6. Re:I don't get it? by AeroIllini · · Score: 1
      Other then "gadget factor" whats the real value in this?

      This reminds me of the "Tablet PC" revolution (I baught one). Although a great piece of technology there wasn't a significant increase in productivity or features that warented the extra effort to adapt to the technology.

      Why does every advance in technology require that everyone and their brother eventually use one?

      Different technologies have different uses, and should be treated as such. The Tablet PC may be cumbersome and awkward for someone who would really prefer a laptop, but they are being used extensively in hospitals and other areas where they are replacing clipboards, and in those areas are considered a smashing success.

      The one handed keyboard (along with others, like the Dvorak keyboard) didn't take off because people didn't want to relearn how to type. QUERTY has been the defacto standard long enough that the general population doesn't have a compelling reason to relearn to type. However, those systems might work well in a court reporter or closed-captioning setting, if they are indeed faster than the shorthand systems in place now.

      You don't see regular computer users moving their mouse around with a Wacom Tablet or a Spaceball, either, but they do have their own specialist uses (computer artwork and CAD systems, respectively) where they are incredibly successful.

      I see this OLED keyboard being used by hardcore gamers (especially MMORPG players) who can show icons of the in-game action on their keyboard shortcuts. It would also be successful in a "Grandma's First PC" situation, where pressing Shift causes all the letters to go uppercase, and pressing Ctrl turns them into descriptions of hotkey functions (cut, copy, paste, for example). I, for one, would jump at the chance to map the shortcuts in programs like Blender to this keyboard to help me learn them.

      Just because it isn't suited for everyone, doesn't mean it's going to fail as a product.
      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  17. Huh? What exactly is this? by rueger · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Am I alone in reading the blurb on Slashdot and not having a clue what it was about? Please folks, a three word description for the unititated would be nice.

    Optimus was the Radio Shack speaker line at one time, so I immediately thought audio. Then I saw keyboard, then I saw three button, which sounds like a mouse. Then I saw excessive CPU usage, which doesn't sound like any keybaord OR mouse that I know of...

    At which point it seemed that there wasn't whole lot of reasons to RTFA.

    1. Re:Huh? What exactly is this? by Sepper · · Score: 1

      The Optimus Keyboard was featured on Slashdot a couple of times before. It's a keyboard with OLED screens for keys, making it possible to chnage the layout AND the look of the keys at will... Check: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimus_Keyboard

      This review is about the first pre-concept device with only 3 buttons/screens. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimus_mini_three

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    2. Re:Huh? What exactly is this? by drb_chimaera · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't "not have a clue everyone is talking about" be a great reason to RTFA?

      Canned history:

      A concept keyboard was demonstrated a bit more than a year ago - rather than traditional keys each key was effectively a mini display so could change what was on each key very easily - a good example would be for games - rather than having to remember that, for example, key 'e' corresponds to "use" how about replacing the icon on the 'e' key with an icon to reflect its current function?

      Anyhoo - lots of people jumped on this and said it was the best thing since... oh I don't know - the latest release of Debian or something ;) and the company behind it announced that it would be a while til it came to market, but in the meantime they would release a drastically cut down version with three buttons. That would be this thing, although its a good few months late.

  18. anyone actually read this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    FTA: "claims a good fifty percent of CPU-capacity of the 933MHz laptop"

    Yeah, 50%, yada yada, but 450 mhz of whatever crap ass cpu they have in their review pc could likely be under 10% on a modern desktop chip.

    Then he says: "Still not perfect, but even better than the hardware, is the software. On this matter, the Russian developers certainly deserve some credit because of the frequent updates and the quick response to reported problems."

    Huh??? They deserve credit for creating problems and responding to (read: not necessarily fixing) problems they created? (Spare the immature microsoft references.) The only thing worse than this reviewer's apparent buying decisions is his spelling and grammar.

    1. Re:anyone actually read this crap? by geekster · · Score: 1

      That's 50%... for a 3 button keyboard!

  19. Bah... get a real keyboard! by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unicomp. The true one and only heir to the IBM Model M.

    1. Re:Bah... get a real keyboard! by damieng · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've an original Model M (keyspring), a Mattias Pro (Alps switch) and a Das Keyboard II (Cherry switch).

      The Das Keyboard II is nicer to type on than the IBM imho...

      --
      [)amien
    2. Re:Bah... get a real keyboard! by 1gig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personaly I like the Das as well but I really prefer to have the keys marked so I got the Cherry G803000LPMUS-0 which is the same keyboard as the Das (gray instead of black though). They are still expensive but $67 for a good keyboard is not to bad. All the new high end keyboards or you could say quality mechanical keyboards are using the Cherry MX Liner keyswitches so why not buy from the source and save some money. The only problem is they are hard to find basicly only POS providers have them here in the states. If you live in the EU though they are allot easer to find.

    3. Re:Bah... get a real keyboard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if Cherry's website weren't such a mess... Unicomp's is very crude, mid-90s style, but at least you can find your way around. And Matias has the best site, sure, but the Tactile Pro is out of stock right now and it's a bit too expensive.

    4. Re:Bah... get a real keyboard! by 1gig · · Score: 1

      Actually there site is not too bad just select keyboards and input devices and you go direct to the keyboard section. What is hard is finding more detailed information on thier keyboards. This is where google is your friend search for this (exactly) cherry_katalog2004_engl.pdf (one hit) and get it. It is basicly there keyboard catalog and it explains all of the keyswitch tech as well as which keyboards come with what and what the model numbers are. Then go back to google and search for the part number of the keyboard you want. But again only POS (Point Of Sale) providers carry most of the cherry keyboards and a few of them have them in stock. They have another keyboard that looks very interesting as well its the G84-4100 which is a mini (or space saving ) keyboard that uses the Mechanical ML switch ( get the katalog it explains the differance between the MX and ML switches ). I'm very tempted to by one. Think small slim mechanical keyboard. The main diff between the MX and ML switches is the travel. Anyways once I get my G803000 (LUNUS-0 for USB LPMUS-0 p/s 2) I will write up a review of it..

    5. Re:Bah... get a real keyboard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a *real* keyboard... times two!

  20. Reminds me of a dilbert strip by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Dilbert tells the customer, "This is our new product, it has just one button and we push it in the factory before we ship it."

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  21. can't wait by harlemjoe · · Score: 1

    for NSFW keycaps!

    --
    shooting is not too good for my enemies
  22. "It still would be neat." by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    "It's expensive, slow, sucks CPU, and crashes. The packaging is photoshopped by the same guy who removes the moles, stretch marks and rolls of skin in the Victoria's Secret catalogues.

    BUT I GOTTA HAVE IT!"

    Steve Jobs must be behind this somewhere, because you are under the control of a powerful Reality Distortion Field.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:"It still would be neat." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it looks like a troll and smells like a troll...

  23. Let me be the first to say thanks. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thank you, to all the dorks who buy overpriced, half-baked, barely-functional products like this one. You fund the research and development that makes these things useful for the rest of us. We salute you.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  24. Not that simple by Moraelin · · Score: 1
    Yeah, 50%, yada yada, but 450 mhz of whatever crap ass cpu they have in their review pc could likely be under 10% on a modern desktop chip.


    1. Have a look at some of those "crap ass CPUs" in laptops before shooting your mouth. An old 933 MHz P3 laptop will run circles around a similarly clocked P4 Prescott. The P3 features _much_ higher IPC (instructions per cycle). There's a reason why the Banias and Dothan (Centrino) and later Core/Core2 are based on the P3 core, and not on the P4.

    The Prescott still wins on the whole by sheer virtue of being clocked 4 times faster, but the different IPC may still screw your maths up big time. Some 450 MHz wasted on a "crap ass" P3 will mean something like 600+ MHz wasted on a Prescott, which for some desktops can mean 20%-25% wasted on just a funky 3-key keyboard.

    2. Even _if_ it were "only" 10%, like you claim, it's still 10% wasted on a stupid 3-key keyboard. But, heck, even if it were a full keyboard, there's no excuse to need that much CPU power. The software should just upload the images to the keyboard and then stay the fuck out of the way. Even complex sound-mixing software and drivers needs less CPU power nowadays. There's no excuse for a keyboard driver to need more.

    At any rate, I don't want it taking that kind of CPU time when I'm playing or doing anything else. If I wanted only 90% of the CPU, I'd have bought a CPU clocked at only 90% of the speed in the first place.
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Not that simple by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Or you could take his "math" to the next step. What would the CPU usage on a 104 key keyboard? By the same logic if it "only" uses 10% with 3 keys, with 104 it'd be... 347% CPU usage! Teh driverz are overclockn' my megahurtz!!

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    2. Re:Not that simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Have a look at some of those "crap ass CPUs" in laptops before shooting your mouth. An old 933 MHz P3 laptop will run circles around a similarly clocked P4 Prescott. The P3 features _much_ higher IPC (instructions per cycle). There's a reason why the Banias and Dothan (Centrino) and later Core/Core2 are based on the P3 core, and not on the P4.

      The Prescott still wins on the whole by sheer virtue of being clocked 4 times faster, but the different IPC may still screw your maths up big time. Some 450 MHz wasted on a "crap ass" P3 will mean something like 600+ MHz wasted on a Prescott, which for some desktops can mean 20%-25% wasted on just a funky 3-key keyboard.

      2. Even _if_ it were "only" 10%, like you claim, it's still 10% wasted on a stupid 3-key keyboard. But, heck, even if it were a full keyboard, there's no excuse to need that much CPU power. The software should just upload the images to the keyboard and then stay the fuck out of the way. Even complex sound-mixing software and drivers needs less CPU power nowadays. There's no excuse for a keyboard driver to need more.

      At any rate, I don't want it taking that kind of CPU time when I'm playing or doing anything else. If I wanted only 90% of the CPU, I'd have bought a CPU clocked at only 90% of the speed in the first place.


      Wow, such hostility...but at any rate...

      The kind of person who would buy a $160 3 button display is probably dumping an awful lot into other areas of the pc as well. A machine running a total of 4 GHz either single core or combined dual core could be almost half as efficient clock for clock and come in around 10% cpu. 10 times the Mhz at half the efficiency is still 5 times the processing power. Ready for this- 50 / 5 = 10. This cpu is pre-centrino even, so thats an extremely generous comparison.

      That having been said, congrats on reading the rest of the post, as clearly I stated that the makers of this software seem to have learned their software engineering off the back of a cereal box. I dont want this piece of crap nor do i want its atrocious software, but when the blurb claims "OMG 50% CPU LOL!!!!11ONE" lets be fair and point out the facts.

      Or you could take his "math" to the next step. What would the CPU usage on a 104 key keyboard? By the same logic if it "only" uses 10% with 3 keys, with 104 it'd be... 347% CPU usage! Teh driverz are overclockn' my megahurtz!!

      I really dont see your point here. I dont want this thing and clearly the drivers are horrific (reading comprehension, try it some time). That having been said, I guess you've never checked cpu usage on multi-cpu systems, as they often do report as a % of each cpu and therefore, yes, 347% cpu happens commonly on the 4 cpu systems I use in our lab from time to time. Not in any way giving you credit for your completely invalid argument, as again this software is almost as inneficient as itunes for windows, which i think takes some actual effort in terms of general retardedness. But it should be noted that your "joke" is just downright wrong.

  25. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 0

    Three screens?

    Kill them.

    Kill them all.

    Do it!

    1. Re:Moo by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Ohh man, thanks for taking me back! I loved that episode! Bad Blood wasn't it?

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    2. Re:Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

      I don't remember the name. But yeah, it was a great episode. :)

      In the department store, by two screens:

      Over there.
      (glances at rifles)
      Do it
      Do it now.

      Heh.

  26. How long before RadioShack... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

    sues over the use of their Optimus brand name?

  27. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    What i like about this is innovation in the keyboard. Not that the keyboard needs to be changed. I enjoy being able to pick up a cheap KB for a few bucks. But it'd be interesting to see what they come up with.

    Of course, i'd go with "self-cleaning" before screens. My KB is a premier crud puppy nursery.

  28. Nice toy, but... by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

    It's a nice toy and all, but in my opinion, any practicality is fleeting. Here's why:

    I work with a lot of design programs every day. As such, I get tired of moving my mouse from one tool to the other and have discovered (unlike many in my office) the joy of shortcut keys. While I first needed a cheat sheet to help with the differences between my various programs, after some repitition I was able to easily remember "V" in Photoshop is "A" in Multi-Ad Creator. While an Optimus would have been ideal at first, quickly it would have been rendered useless in favor of committing keys to memory.

    Furthermore, it seems to be removed, but when I last checked on this product, the "shelf life" for lack of a better term was listed. It was the number of hours the device would be suspected to last. I don't recall the exact number but when a friend and I calculated it out it ended up being not to terribly long for a product of that price.

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
    1. Re:Nice toy, but... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      after some repitition I was able to easily remember "V" in Photoshop is "A" in Multi-Ad Creator. While an Optimus would have been ideal at first, quickly it would have been rendered useless in favor of committing keys to memory.

      I think it will work, for just that reason. By pressing ctrl, you will see all of the options, including ones you don't know about. You mentally associate that function with that particular key location, instead of finding it through trawling the menus. You'd notice a lot of new tricks with this keyboard. It would be amazing to use it with something heavy on shortcuts such as Eclipse.

  29. Re:CTRL-ALT-DEL jokes in 3..2..1.. by xtracto · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems you are 4 jokes late :)

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  30. Got there too late by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Got there and was told "De MySQL server ligt te slapen". Looks like I'll have to come back when the MySQL server decides to get up. I think it had a heavy night partying with /.ers.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  31. just goes to show you by cadience · · Score: 1, Troll

    Get a good patent lawyer. I was in the process of patenting this same thing several years ago. My patent attorney was horrible though. Charge way to much, and did way to little. He didn't file for over a year. After this designer filed we decided to drop the issue instead of trying to go through litigation. Ironically, the PIC they use is the same that I use at work. If this product does several of the features intended with my design, it will be a very benificial product indeed.

  32. Re:CTRL-ALT-DEL jokes in 3..2..1.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is already 5 jokes too many.

  33. Mirror! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Yay for NetworkMirror.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  34. Tweakers.net has the keyboard connected by egnop · · Score: 1

    To their server... It consumes so much CPU that the sql-server just crashed.... or did they just get /.'ed?

  35. Swedish translation.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I got what looks like a server error when I followed the link:
    "De MySQL server ligt te slapen..."

    I did a bablefish translation and it comes back with.
    "Fuck, my MySQL install can't handle the Slashdot effect..."

  36. ...another mini3 review... by daniel.baker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dead Programmer has an informative review over here: http://www.deadprogrammer.com/optimus-mini-three-f ull-review

    --
    stubborn tiny lights vs. clustering darkness foreverok?
  37. Perfect! Now I can have my Ctrl-Alt-Delete! by jrutley · · Score: 0, Redundant
  38. agreed. ZERO tactile feedback on this thing by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 1

    ZERO. totally useless for me.

  39. English / German forum for Optimus Mini Three dev by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 1

    The Optimus Mini Three Support Forum is in both English and German. Perhaps not surprisingly, the forum with by far the most activity is "English - Bugs." There is also a tiny bit of discussion from plugin developers.

  40. Key Bored? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    With so many PC games using the keyboard for control by the player, I'm surprised that QWERTY is still the only kind that I ever see. What kind of reconfigurable "task keyboards" are gamers already using? Any with reconfig keycap displays to match reconfig commands triggered by pressing them? Any that are smarter, like learning common combos and autoconfig'ing to a single key? Any that work more advanced switching than just press/trigger (like going beyond "Caps Lock")?

    These gizmos are the most personal part of a PC, staying in contact with our body much of the day, and representing the most used "user interface" of any mode. Are they really no different from the IBM Selectrics, except cheaper and USB?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Key Bored? by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      I believe you are talking about this.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
  41. OLED Mouse by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not make the OLED's mouse buttons instead?

    Two OLED buttons would be just fine.

    And they should be able to make a driverless interface using the HID class and USB. It's just silly to write your own drivers when USB drivers exist on all platforms to interface your hardware with.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:OLED Mouse by backwardMechanic · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why not make the OLED's mouse buttons instead?


      Because your fingers would cover them up?

    2. Re:OLED Mouse by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      Your fingers cover up regular keys, too.

      To me, doing OLED buttons at all is kinda silly. I certainly don't look at the keyboard when I type; I haven't for years.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    3. Re:OLED Mouse by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but of all the things I never look at, the buttons on my mouse are right up there at the top of the list. I look at my keyboard more often than I look at them, and I touch-type...

      Seriously, they're huge, so no problems missing them, and there's only one per finger, so no problem with getting the wrong one. What earthly use would it be to have OLEDs on them?

  42. Vrouw topless... saywhat? by mkro · · Score: 1

    On the last page of the review there is a picture of the three buttons after being customized. On the last button it seems to say "Vrouw topless op Google Earth", which I belive means "Woman topless on Google Earth".
    How could Slashdot miss that story? THIS IS STUFF THAT MATTERS!

    --
    I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    1. Re:Vrouw topless... saywhat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The story [theregister.co.uk], and of course the vital link to Google earth [regmedia.co.uk].

  43. High pitched humm by Skrynesaver · · Score: 1
    Even more irritating is the high frequency sound that comes from the Optimus Mini Three. This noise, somewhere between 10.000 and 15.000Hz...

    Finaly a keyboard the cat won't try to use
    --
    "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    1. Re:High pitched humm by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  44. PANIC by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    I'd put a nice big red blinking PANIC button on it. Everytime there's something I don't like, I'd smash that button really, really hard. I'd let it do a kill -9 or something.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  45. Got one, been a bit disappointed. by XMunkki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I bought one for the gadget-nerdiness-factor (about 8 months ago :). Now about a month ago they gave away the software + programming APIs. I was kinda disappointed at the spot, since this is not really a USB device. Inside, it uses an USB to serial converter. This is why the display refresh rate is kinda low. The screens themselves are 96x96 per screen, 16bit color. They tend to "flash" a little (I guess that's the OLED for ya).

    I've been programming this device for a weekends worth now. I checked the software they gave and it was ok. It does crash VERY often, though it's not the device that's causing the crashes. The USB to serial chip they use is made by Porlific and I think it's the PL-2303. Now googling for that seems to indicate prolific has had a bad history with working drivers.

    Now being the nerdy hacker type, it seems that for me it only crashes when disconnecting by software. So my solution was to create a stub program in C# that connects to the device, stays connected all the time and listens for incoming TCP connections and routes those to the device. This way the computer stays connected to the device all the time and I can restart the controlling software as often as I like. Haven't had any problems with this approach yet. Still I hope Prolific fixes their serial drivers.

    As for when it comes to the performance, I've noticed something weird. All of my software is currently in C# and has not been optimized. But when feeding the device with image data, the program that sends it to the device takes around 9%, while the program that generates the packets takes somwthing like 40%. This seems kinda weird and I do have some hope of fixing it. :)

    As for the device itself, the reviews I've read have been pretty accurate. It always makes me feel bad to press a display. And the buttons are not as "solid" as I'd like.

    But with enough work I hope to make even something good out of it. I was hoping of making an animated game, but no way of doing that with that serial adapter standing in between.

    1. Re:Got one, been a bit disappointed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Optimus Mini developers:

      "it seems that for me it only crashes when disconnecting by software"

      Yep, it looks like one of the driver problems - program should not quit while software is connected.
      Sorry, we have not added "Close" method to dll and C# example. Will do it later.

      Please ask if you need any information from us.

  46. Go away jock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're obviously not a nerd then. So what are you doing on Slashdot?

  47. Site unavailable due to "power failure" by noidentity · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Door een stroomstoring in het datacentre zijn wij even bezig de boel te herstellen. Due to a power failure at our hoster we are busy trying to fix the database.

    Apparently "stroomstoring" means "Slashdotting", and their translation software approximated that as "power failure".

    1. Re:Site unavailable due to "power failure" by hylke · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, Redbus, which is the location tweakers.net is located had a power failure, which made foobar of some part of the database. The servers didn't have any problem with slashdot, as you can see at the statspage :)

  48. OLED by BSonline · · Score: 1
    Wasn't this released months ago? It's just now being reviewed?

    First, I'd like to take an oppurtunity at the most over looked joke yet.
    In Russia, the keyboard uses your computer.

    Serously, though... they are making a decent breakthrough. The mini-3 is s'posed to provide income with the technology, so that they might actually finish production on the full size keyboard. Someone mentioned a dual USB for this thing, though... why not have memory in the device to cache images for the keys. A cell phone processor could handle everything from there. Instead of updating drivers, this device would have to be flashed. Mini programs could be loaded to the device, and ran independantly of the computer. I thought this was where they were headed in the first place. I guess they are trying to keep their costs down.
    Meanwhile, the full size price is "close to the price of a good cell phone". Obviously, making these things would be less than the price of that cell phone, so why not put the memory and processor in it? With a $400 USD price tag (my estimate) on the end product, it had better be awesome.

    --
    PS: That is what part of the alphabet would look like if the letters "Q" and "R" were removed.
  49. The conclusion by Mike89 · · Score: 1

    The conclusion is a bit odd. In the other pages, the reviewer states that the OLEDs show a slightly green, dull image. Then in the conclusion, he says the images are "bright and clear", a complete backflip. He also goes from thinking the way the software is written is slightly wrong, to thinking it's even better than the hardware!

    1. Re:The conclusion by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      They also state that the color can be adjusted via the software, which solved the problem.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  50. If you're willing to hack or tweak... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

    ...why not start with one of these? It projects a virtual keyboard onto a flat surface, why not hack it to change the character driver? At least you're not stuck waiting for some breakthrough in manufacturing technology to get a full-sized keyboard...

    (Personally, this thing gets my vote for "gadget most likely to actually attract babes in a club". Yes, I understand actually having this category for gadgets makes it extremely unlikely that I ever will attract babes in a club, gadgets or not.)

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
    1. Re:If you're willing to hack or tweak... by VorpalRodent · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, the company that makes the virtual keyboards, Lumio (www.lumio.com), doesn't draw the picture on the desk in quite that way. From what I understand, it's a static image, reproduced by diffractive optics.

      While the website does indicate that they have the capacity for programmable, dynamic images, that is limited to a much smaller size. The demo on their site shows it for simple things like security passcodes.

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
  51. In a world with: by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    A very special episode on an all-new, "CSI:<insert town here>"

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  52. Should be soon by geekoid · · Score: 1

    since some large company is going to buy one of these, find a better way to manufacture them, and have them on the market very soon.
    Then sue these people.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  53. Not for Touch typists. by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    In the end, it comes down to 1 thing... Computer fanatics don't look at the keyboard. They don't look away from the screen at all. If they have to look away to tell what it going on, they are missing something on-screen to do it.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  54. For a full keyboard? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There would be lots of uses. In games you could show icons with the actual functionality of the keys (fire, grenade, teleport, hyderdrive, whatever).

    In word processing applications you could show which keys do things such as undo, etc

    When you hold shift or caps the letters can switch between upper and lower case

    When you press CTRL the associated function keys could change to show their designated function.

    Lots of possibilities here, though a lot do depend on the software itself supporting the keyboard.

    1. Re:For a full keyboard? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Not only is that exactly what the full-sized keyboard is designed for, they have pictures of just such a thing (or perhaps concept renderings, but I think they were actual photos) being done here (scroll down).

      Well, they've got application-specific keyboard layouts anyways, not entirely unlike the Z-board (though much cooler); one could only assume that the modifier keys will actually modify what's being shown accordingly, and do so specific to the app.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:For a full keyboard? by Random832 · · Score: 1

      If you superimpose two of the images by crossing your eyes, you'll find that they're identical pixel-for-pixel except in the labels - these aren't photographs.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  55. Great info! by phorm · · Score: 1

    First of all, I'd have to say thanks for all the firsthand information!

    Secondly, it seems that currently it only supports windows, which is too bad as I could see a lot of hackers of the other OS's finding this a usefule device. Open drivers (not just a programming API) would be a nice thought too

    My primary beef with the device would be the aforementioned serial converter, which would really such on a fullsize keyboard, as well as the flicker issue. Hopefully they'll fix it up for the full-sized keyboard device, in which case I might actually buy one (if somebody comes up with a driver for my OS).

    1. Re:Great info! by XMunkki · · Score: 1

      Well I can answer this one easily.. The Linux DOES have PL-2303 drivers (that's what I checked first; the source code I mean).. It has had those for quite some time. There have been some GPS software based on it. So yes, while I haven't tested it, I'd assume you can use it under linux.

      After all, it only is USB to serial, nothing more..

  56. Review with video by DemonWeeping · · Score: 1

    I reviewed this weeks ago and included a video that clearly demonstrates how unstable and unreliable the software is. Hope you enjoy it. Forgive the quality of the video. I had a flu.

  57. 3-10-104 by Tom · · Score: 1

    Interesting tech demo. Maybe they should make a 10-key version next, to corner the game market.

    I know I'd buy something that gives me the Guild Wars skill bar in a hardware version. I'm sure many other players of other MMORPGs would like to have actual keys to press that show the skills currently in the quickbar.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  58. Three keys missing!! by ro_coyote · · Score: 1

    Three keys short from really being able to have one of these

    Yarr.

  59. just say no by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

    Tweakers? I'm not taking tech advice from a bunch of meth heads.

    (well, it's what I first thought)

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  60. Touch Screen? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    Cany anyone explain to my why this is better than touch-sensitive screens that have been around for years? An LCD touch screen, lying on it's back would be cheaper and have a much better frame rate! ;)

    1. Re:Touch Screen? by serbanp · · Score: 1

      There is no tactile feeling.

  61. obligatory Microsoft Keyboard joke by Fry-kun · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised they didn't mention this old gag

    If it cost $20 instead of $100, I would buy one just to display those three buttons on my desktop :D

    --
    Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?
  62. Re: Make a image that spans accross all keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When someone gets a prompt to hit "any key" change all of the pics on a the keyboard into a combined image in large bold letters "ANY KEY" Make installs interactive... When a yes or no question comes up change the entire keyboard to blank with a large sentence in the center that says

    "" and then have the keys the arrows are pointing to colored green and red and flash!

  63. solutions to their cpu usage by caching? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    One of the solutions could be to have a small memory cache/cpu on board of the keyboard which gets stuffed by the driver; only making the animated keys to be using cpu load. This way the cpu doesn't need to handle all the load and the keyboard will take most of the load on itself...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  64. *waits for an OLED keyboard with buckling springs* by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    I couldn't imagine life without my Model M (connected to my new Pentium 4) but I must admit, I would buy an OLED keyboard with buckling springs, and I'd pay good money for it too.

    The only issue with the Model M...there is no way of talking on the phone and typing discretely at the same time.

  65. Thanks for that by lakeland · · Score: 1

    In a half-page comment you gave me a far better understanding of whether I want one now or later than page after page of review.

  66. Ohh man, so much effort. by Vr6dub · · Score: 1
    Well...I was in the same position but I decided to *gasp* click the linky. WAAM!! Right there at the top of the page (I didn't even have to move my mouse!) was an explanation of the product. I understand they could have explained it a bit better in the summary but the time it took you to write your little bitch session you could have read most of the review. Waa waa waa, my finger hurts...I can't click the linky. Besides, the title does have the words "KEYBOARD" and "OLED" in it which kinda gives me an idea of what the article was about. You do know what a keyboard is, don't you?

    You remind me of the people who come to my office asking a computer question then get mad when I tell them to send an email to the helpdesk. They say, "but it's just a real quick question, why can't you answer it now?", to which I say, "you could have saved yourself the energy and probably had an answer quicker if you had sent the email in the first place."

  67. Miniature porn by empaler · · Score: 1

    I actually recall a Playboy CD-ROM available in the early 90s (around 1993) designed for Mac OS 8/9 (ca.) and Windows 3.1;

    When used in Win3 you could minimize the video window, and the 16x16 icon would then keep showing the video. W00t.
     
    Come to think of it, that was probably a QT-feature. Still.
     
    Oh, and er. The porn. Was. Erm. My cousin's. Yeah. Totally not mine.

  68. Bad concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Onto the device itself. I'm glad to see it develop and that it's more than just a concept.

    It's a bad concept. Not only is it poorly executed here (buggy, slow, expensive, only 3 keys, ...), but even if you could fix all these glitches, a whole keyboard of this would suck.

    - One of the nice things about a keyboard is that it's stable. The key marked "T" is always "T". Ever had your computer slow down for a second while it swaps to disk? Can you imagine waiting for your keyboard to update? (What key would it register as, if I pressed it while it was swapping between two labels?)

    - "E-paper" sounds like a good solution, because it sounds like "paper", and paper is cheap. Unfortunately "e-paper" is currently also insanely expensive.

    - If you had a keyboard which applications could remap, they'd do it poorly. Some by accident: there are always programs which don't get everything right. I don't want them messing with my keyboard.

    - Others, simply because it's a hard problem: who controls your keys? Alt-tab is always alt-tab ... but what if your app changed the labels on alt and/or tab? (They show mock-ups where this is done.) Some keys have system-wide meaning, and relabelling them makes them virtually useless for this.

    - And even if you assume that only your app will need the key, how will you know how it's to be used? Sometimes pressing a key once does something different than holding it down. Sometimes keys will need to be disabled -- will you have dimmed keys? (How frustrating would that be?) Sometimes it depends on other context, like where the mouse is -- will you dim keys based on mouse movement? Sometimes it depends on the state of computation -- will you disable keys based on events that aren't user-initiated?

    - Finally, the user's hands are on the keyboard! Dynamically-changing information is something the user wants to (and should) look at. If there's one place where you *don't* *want* to put information for the user to look at, it's directly under their hands.

    That's not to say that current keyboard designs are good. I haven't seen any current keyboard designs that I think are good. They all suck. But a full Optimus keyboard doesn't fix many of the things you can fix without OLEDs, and adds huge potential for suckage -- both intentional and unintentional -- that doesn't exist with dumb old fixed labels.

    The *one* use I could possibly see for this is labelling my function keys. I have a whole row of keys labelled "F1" through "F12" that do something different everywhere, and I have no idea what. Change the labels on those, if you want -- then they might actually get used. But don't change keys that I'm using.

  69. Critical feature on the full kbd won't make it... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    ... in the early versions, if ever, that is sure clear. For many applications you may want to remap the keyboard on a per application basis, which means that it would have to update the display as you change focus from one window to another. For certain multilingual applications, or for calculating with an APL interpreter using it special character set, it will need to switch labels when one of those stupid windows popups arrives and steals away the focus, or anytime you switch the active window. If the thing is dog-slow in doing that (which the 3-button version implies), it just ain't gonna cut the mustard...

  70. Don't even joke about it! by Meph_the_Balrog · · Score: 1
    Wait until the mosquito starts buzzing around your keyboard.


    I can see many people doing a Dr. Banner at this point...

    Banner:"Dammit, I need to figure out how to... what the hell is this thing on my keyb.."
    Hulk:"HULK SMASH!"
    Banner:"Dammit, now I need another keyboard.. *sigh*"
  71. Cost by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

    They say in the review "it won't cost $5400" because the displays will be smaller and some other things...

    But it's a fair chance it will cost $1000. The prices per key aren't going to come down a huge amount. Maybe the 64x64 display is half the price of 96x96, and with larger numbers they halve the price again... it's still a heck of a lot of money.

    --
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
  72. I'd like to post a review - by Geminii · · Score: 1

    ...but my keyboard just crashed :/