Slashdot Mirror


The World's Most-High Tech Urinal

Mudzy writes "In an effort to handle its nighttime public urination problem, Victoria, the capital of British Columbia, is considering installing high-tech urinals that disappear below street level during the day. Then at night, an operator comes by with a remote and the Urilift hydraulically lifts to sidewalk level in about two minutes. Then the unit is ready to serve all the nighttime party animals who don't mind peeing in a very exposed public urinal. The $75,000 system has been installed across the Netherlands, and have spread to London and Belfast, but Victoria will be the first North American city to try them out."

225 comments

  1. High Tech Urinal? by billimad · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're taking the piss. Sorry.

    1. Re:High Tech Urinal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's not just a high tech urinal. It's a "most-high" one.

    2. Re:High Tech Urinal? by niiler · · Score: 1

      The next stage in this product's development will be to include long range alcohol sniffers and the latest advances robotics. These urinals will be released at dusk and immediately go on patrol, sniffing out drunks and following them around until they get so p*ssed...

    3. Re:High Tech Urinal? by khedron+the+jester · · Score: 0

      They say that graffiti is impossible on the stainless steel surface. Well, I'll just see how impossible it is when I walk past one in London :)

    4. Re:High Tech Urinal? by khedron+the+jester · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, scratch that. Some enterprising university goers will either find a way to spoof the remote control they use to control its ascent and descent (hilarity ensues), or will remove one from the hole as a souvenir for their dorm.

    5. Re:High Tech Urinal? by l33t_f33t · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I think we already have these in areas of London. I don't like them as the may go underground while I'm using them.

    6. Re:High Tech Urinal? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      And then a robotic tentacle arm to reach around a pull a turd from your arse.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    7. Re:High Tech Urinal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      that is a major flaw.. they should install warning lights. 'Beep, beep, stop p*ssing and get away, we're going underground.' that could make some laughs.

    8. Re:High Tech Urinal? by hcob$ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All it takes is a frequency scanner and data recorder. First night, get the frequency it operates on. Next night show up with a datalogger to sniff the data used to raise/lower the device.... Or, you could buy a remote off one of the poor guys whose job it is to raise the damn things.

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    9. Re:High Tech Urinal? by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering the recent console news, I had to throw this one in...

      So, they spoof the remote, make their own remote control to play with the urinals... a "Pee-mote" as it were...
      *Ba-dum-CSHHH!* I'm here all night folks. Try the veal.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  2. But what about... by AgentFade2Black · · Score: 1

    What about during the day?
    Should we punish those who must heed nature's call when there aren't any public restrooms anywhere in sight?

    1. Re:But what about... by KingArthur10 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Many places are lucky they're installed at all. Here in the US, it would cause a lot of pissed off Christians to get that program going. Remember, we may have *penises and/or vaginas*, but we're not suppose to admit it. The last thing most of the religious people want to have is that fact being out in the open. And if you read this post, you're dirty dirty dirty!!!!!!

      --
      I came, I saw, She conquered.
    2. Re:But what about... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Many places are lucky they're installed at all. Here in the US, it would cause a lot of pissed off Christians to get that program going."

      I dunno...these things would be a Godsend for New Orleans during Mardi Gras!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Quite often there aren't enough port-a-potty's around for you to find one....and afterawhile of drinking on the streets, that stuff starts to run through ya pretty fast, and it isn't like you're too terribly embarrased as to where you have to 'whip it out' to take a leak.

      On the other hand, I wonder how long it would take when these came out, that the city/state would be sued for discrimination against women who needed to go 'in public', or would be slapped with injunctions about them not being 'handicapped friendly'.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:But what about... by UOZaphod · · Score: 1
      You're right that it would never make it in the U.S., but for the wrong reasons. The real reason is that 1) It discriminates against women, and 2) it discriminates against the handicapped. I remember an article not too long ago about a high-tech public bathroom that cleaned itself every few hours. It was banned in the U.S. because it didn't provide handicapped access, even though it was welcomed by the general public at the time.


      For it to succeed in the U.S., it would have to be enclosed to provide walls with hand-rails, and provide a commode with a seat. In effect, it would have to be a complete bathroom.

      --
      "The unicode stuff in the latest version is working fabulously well. My russian mafia friends are ecstatic."
    4. Re:But what about... by hcob$ · · Score: 1

      Thank the lawyers for that little bit of trouble.

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    5. Re:But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Quite often there aren't enough port-a-potty's around for you to find one....and afterawhile of drinking on the streets, that stuff starts to run through ya pretty fast, and it isn't like you're too terribly embarrased as to where you have to 'whip it out' to take a leak.


      Of course public urination is enough to get you branded as a sex criminal these days.
    6. Re:But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about during the day?

      I live in Victoria. There are public washrooms. We're a tourist town.

      As for this thing, it's the first I've heard of it. Yup, the 2am drunks are a big problem, but it's interesting there's no mention of the greater problem of the homeless. Our shelters are completely maxed out. There's a lot of people living in the raw.

      Probably I should add we're not the brightest municipality. Anytime something like this is mentioned, you better start humming the monorail song, cause we're going to get stung again.

    7. Re:But what about... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Of course public urination is enough to get you branded as a sex criminal these days."

      Well, whipping it out during Mardi Gras can get you some long beads!!!

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      women can direct their pee standing up, it's just that a lot of them don't know how. . . i read a newspaper article about it that was taped to the wall of my local bike shop and told a couple of friends about it. . . they had to practice the technique in the shower a few times but now whenever we go barhopping they're up against the wall with everyone else. . .

    9. Re:But what about... by jiriw · · Score: 1

      women who needed to go 'in public'

      For the alternatively equipped half of this worlds population we have another very 'Dutch' invention, indeed. The 'Plastuit'. A fancy piece of folded cardboard in assorted funky colors.

      http://www.p-mate.com/eng/intro.html

  3. is it funny? is it lame? by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    I found the fact that that page snagged video cameras amusing, then funnier that the subject of the first 'related posts' was

    amazingly small

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  4. the death of decency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about requiring bars (or just the city itself) to furnish 24-hour public toilets ? Oh gosh of course we don't want to help the homeless... I have a kidney condition which makes me urinate frequently, so yeah I've peed in various semi-public places before when I couldn't find a public bathroom. FWIW, remember that Victoria has been in the news for dumping raw sewage into Puget Sound- it was a big item a few years back when I lived in the Seattle area. Of all the possible answers, I can't see this proposal being THE ONE.

  5. Funniest. Narrator voice. Ever... by ziggamon2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously, watch the video, it's hillarious ;)

    1. Re:Funniest. Narrator voice. Ever... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or did the voice sound like Terrance and Phillip? Fitting, since the article is about a Canadian city.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  6. they're cool by operato · · Score: 3, Funny

    the one in belfast is cool. it's just down the street from me and instead of using the one at my place i walk down there to do my stuff and meet girls who are there spectating (they're jealous because they can't stand up to do it).

    1. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      A girlcanpee standing up. All you have to do is insert your middle and ring fingers between your fanny lips, to hold them apart and so keep a clear path for your stream; and press your index and little fingers either side to aim. It's easiest to find the correct position by squatting down just the very first time you try it, so as your "gates" open naturally, then standing up with your hand in place; but once you've found the correct position, you can do it every time and not even get your fingers wet.

      Practice in the shower and use a mirror if you can't see how you're going wrong. It's well worth mastering the technique -- it can be handy for scaring away the wrong sort of guys!

    2. Re:they're cool by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      You've obvious not heard the same stories as me about lesbians pissing in nightclub urinals.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    3. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Practice in the shower ...scaring away the wrong sort of guys!

      Yeah, it works... urinating in the shower scares away all the gays and velour but the real men won't think twice about it.

    4. Re:they're cool by Jawood · · Score: 1
      ...i walk down there to do my stuff and meet girls who are there spectating

      They may be sizing you guys up.

      That might be a great way to meet women! Walk up to the urinal and ask for a step ladder. When asked why, you say that the urinal isn't low enough for you.

      Schwing!

    5. Re:they're cool by Reemi · · Score: 1

      Never heard about the TravelMate?
      http://www.travelmateinfo.com/page002.html

    6. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      >..snip..girls who are ... jealous because they can't stand up to do it..

      Don't be to shure of that. I live in the Netherlands and in 'my' city's center there are a few a these installed as well. A fair number of ladies now use a 'plastuit'. I don't know a english word for that gadget. Check out http://www.plastuit.nl/ It takes a bit of getting used to, but it does work. And then there are those whom have mastered the art of doggy like lift-one-leg style of pee. I'll leave the details of that to your imagination. But it must be said that it does work.

      Martin.

    7. Re:they're cool by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      On the website you provided, it's referred to as the "P-mate" if you click the english side of things...

    8. Re:they're cool by jimicus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can we have a "-1, Too Much Information" mod?

    9. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I mean, one time I was in this French nightclub with about 3 toilets between about 3000 people. So I went out on the fire escape for a "tinkle". Second time I had to go, a member of staff called after me [in French, I'm translating], "excuse me, miss ....." I ignored him and went out onto the platform, hitched up my skirt and commenced Operation Windermere. The fat Frenchman caught up with me, saw what I was up to, said "Very sorry, sir" and left me alone the whole rest of the evening!

      In Britain, by the way, the waste plumbing is always on the outsideof the house. The WC pipe goes out horizontally through the wall, and connects into the main sewer pipe which rises up to just above roof level to act as a vent. The waste pipes from the basin and bath come through the wall and can clearly be seen joining into the same pipe. So if you do a wee in the shower, it definitely goes to the same place.

    10. Re:they're cool by Nimey · · Score: 0

      Fascinating.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    11. Re:they're cool by yosofun · · Score: 1

      There's no need to get biological about this. They have disposable cones that do the dickmulation for you: http://img126.imageshack.us/full.php?image=magicco ne7wv.swf ;)

    12. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :-O

      Please tell me more!!

    13. Re:they're cool by sapgau · · Score: 1

      Awesome. I will show my wife see what she thinks

    14. Re:they're cool by hattig · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Britain, by the way, the waste plumbing is always on the outsideof the house.

      That's for older houses up to the sixties - either they were so old they used to have external toilets, and the process of converting a room into an inside toilet is made easier by running the waste pipe externally, or they didn't think better of it.

      Most (all?) modern houses have the waste pipe inside, in a corner of the house, although the vent still goes up through the roof.

      I'm sure the bath/shower and toilets use the same waste pipe however.

      Future houses may have to incorporate a grey-water storage tank underneath, which will use sink and bath outflows to reuse for toilet flushing and garden watering. Dunno how they'll deal with the soap issue for the latter...

      God, why did I spend a few minutes writing a post about British waste pipe engineering?!

    15. Re:they're cool by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ah yes... not getting your fingers wet... what really matters is not getting your skirt/pants/jeans or knickers wet either... or keeping it in the urinal and not getting it all over the floor...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    16. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those weren't lesbians.

    17. Re:they're cool by SteveAstro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, an internal stack is pain when there is a blockage, say your son has stuffed the bath sponge round the U bend and tried to wash it away... Cue 20 feet of 4" pipe full of unmentionable, with an access trap at the bottom. In your lounge.

      Steve

    18. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the pee-in-the-shower issue too.

      And the drink-from-the-garden-hose issue.

    19. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hatig you are so wrong. The reasons the waste pipes on British houses were placed on the outside was to facilitate maintenance. A really stupid decision was made to alter the building regulations. Now maintenance of waste pipe plumbing in a house built with interior waste pipes is much more difficult and expensive.

    20. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wear a skirt, and don't bother with underwear. Works for me! When I'm wearing a long skirt, I can just squat down over a drain grid or some grass, and relieve myself absolutely discreetly.

      I'm sure men could do the same, if they would wear skirts.

    21. Re:they're cool by dargaud · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also known as 'Freshette', sold as a medical device but often used by female mountain climbers. Take a look at the pic of my wife and her friends using one... Yeah, who'd had thought that a group pissing pic could be relevant to a /. discussion...

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    22. Re:they're cool by starfishsystems · · Score: 1

      I reckon it might come in handy in other emergencies too. Years ago I was at this excellent Dylan/Santana concert in Göteborg which was full to capacity. The queue outside the women's washroom was about an hour long. So women in desperation started crashing the men's washroom. Fair enough. We let them have the toilet stalls, but even then there was a major queue of women outside the men's. Meanwhile the urinals went underused, and that's just the way it was. Now if I was a woman, this would not be the time I tried your technique for the first time. It would take a fair bit of sass anyway. Best get some practice in beforehand. You never know. Cheers,

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    23. Re:they're cool by Yartrebo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So long as it's real soap (sodium and fatty acids), it's non-toxic and unlikely to cause much of a mess. It's even digestible and is metabolized in much the same way as fat.

    24. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A woman who does not want to sleep with you is not necessarily a lesbian.

    25. Re:they're cool by rgaginol · · Score: 1

      In Australia we've got one too called the "Pee-mate" for ladies to use at large festivals where the number of girls toilets never seems to stop huge lines, and inevitably has them using the guys facilities.

    26. Re:they're cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on the woman. Women have many different shapes down there and some are farther back than others. Sorry to burst your bubble sweetheart, but just because you can do it, doesn't mean all women can.

    27. Re:they're cool by Plutonite · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's just put it like this:

      A girl can't pee while standing up and post with her real nickname :)

    28. Re:they're cool by hattig · · Score: 1

      Heh, I guess it isn't Slashdot, News For Plumbers for a reason...

      I had actually wondered why the waste pipe was inside in more modern houses because of the maintainance issue. Silly me.

    29. Re:they're cool by brainspank · · Score: 2, Funny

      holy crap.

      that should have said "a girl can pee standing up. trust me."

      I feel dirty.

      --
      It's only a model.
    30. Re:they're cool by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Only in Europe would they be coming up with ways to enable women to urinate while standing up while trying to convince men that it'd be a good idea to sit down instead. :-P

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    31. Re:they're cool by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      A woman who is at a lesbian bar is probably a lesbian.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    32. Re:they're cool by swanky+street · · Score: 1

      WTF?!?! I seriously did not need to hear about how girls piss standing up. And now that I have, I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT. Man will always be superior in his ability to piss standing up (and sometimes even on the run). But seriously, that was way too much info.

    33. Re:they're cool by zobier · · Score: 1

      To the boys that said that was too much info, grow up!
      BTW, that's the second time I've seen this posted here. The last time was a couple years ago and included instructions for how a guy can have multiple Os - leaving it ambiguous as to whether it was a guy or girl posting.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  7. If it ran linux ... by Fookin · · Score: 2, Funny

    then it would be perfect for a cron job. Why do you need to pay someone to click the friggin button?
    If not cron, maybe X11 to the rescue?

    1. Re:If it ran linux ... by holistah · · Score: 1

      surely you mean X10?

    2. Re:If it ran linux ... by Aoreias · · Score: 1

      Given that there seem to be no indications that something which looks like a manhole is really covering a 6 ft urinal, I would wager that the guy with the remote to activate these things checks to make sure it's reasonably clear of people before raising it.

      --
      We've upped our standards. Up yours.
    3. Re:If it ran linux ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what on earth does X11 have anything to do with this?

      forget about thinking twice, maybe think once before posting?

    4. Re:If it ran linux ... by Fookin · · Score: 1

      Not enough coffee this morning. Good call.

      X10 is what I meant. :-(

    5. Re:If it ran linux ... by Fookin · · Score: 1

      Yeah.

      Lack of coffee is a problem for me.

      I tend to start typing before my brain is fully engaged in Drive.

    6. Re:If it ran linux ... by X-treme-LLama · · Score: 1

      I assume they want someone there to actually watch it being raised and lowered for safety reasons. You wouldn't want some jackass standing on top of it as it goes up, and then falling off and suing the city. Also you wouldn't want anyone to get stuck in it as it goes down. Or possibly get something chopped off. A friend of mine worked at a place that cut various large industrial belts. Giant in-floor hydraulic cutters. Apparently the someone got their lower half caught and it just cut him in two. He had a few pictures from the security report. Gruesome.

      Safety first, even for the drunks that can't find a place to piss.

    7. Re:If it ran linux ... by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Funny
      then it would be perfect for a cron job. Why do you need to pay someone to click the friggin button?
      If it ran Linux, you could automate this with a cron job, but you would also have to deal with the fact that flushing is permanently on the "To Do" list, and if you complain that it is not functioning you are told to go "code it yourself". The toilet would also come with a hefty support contract at a cost approximately 500% of the purchase price.

      On the bright side though, the new flashy lights and color scheme are sure to make this the year the Linux toilet is ready for the home bathroom.
    8. Re:If it ran linux ... by tjernobyl · · Score: 1

      ..Because odds are, someone's going to park on one and complain bitterly when their car goes rubber-side-up.

  8. Corvette by suso · · Score: 1

    They want you to pee in a corvette?

    1. Re:Corvette by Joebert · · Score: 1

      That's one of thoose questions where you shoot first, answer questions later.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  9. Re: The World's Most-High Tech Urinal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America?

  10. Great, but does it... by BobSixtyFour · · Score: 1

    come available for dogs? If they made this operatable by dogs, they would solve the problem for "good". :P

    1. Re:Great, but does it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is for humans who act like dogs.

  11. Sad Day by arcite · · Score: 4, Funny
    :::sniff:::

    I went to uni in Victoria. Call me nostalgic but, I'll really miss the urine soaked side walks downtown...It just won't be the same dammit!

    1. Re:Sad Day by sapgau · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, you say that because you are not living in Victoria. It is quite discussting.

    2. Re:Sad Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yep, and Victoria still washes its raw sewage into the ocean which drifts into American waters (Victoria the good neighbour you wished you didn't have). Very eco-friendly of Victoria (not). You see, this is another instance of Canadian environmentalism.

      This is the same thinking that got the Canadian federal government to sign the Kyoto agreement and then allow air emissions to increase almost 35% instead of reducing them (to be fair, this really is mostly the former Liberal government's fault for signing the agreement but failing to pass any laws or regulations with teeth/penalties for not complying... only voluntary guidelines for industry... what a joke). Whether you agree with Kyoto or not, if you sign an agreement to do something, you do it. Now it is economically impossible to meet the limits they agreed to without bringing the country to screaming stop.

      In Canada, if it is convenient, we'll do something. If it is not, we'll say how we should do it, and do nothing. Time to go, I need get my hypocritical ass over to go look for a Hummer H2 to get my groceries up my West Vancouver driveway before I protest about the environmental impact of the Eagle Ridge bluffs highway expansion (I'm worried the highway might block the construction company my mutual fund has bought into from building more condos up the side of the mountain in West Vancouver you see). Yep that highway is really an environmental issue causing the financial environment of the price of my house I had built on pristine mountain side to go down. I am Joe and I am Canadian.

  12. not new by eneville · · Score: 1

    this is not new. we have had these in my home town, Reading/UK for a long time. people used to piss on the streets at night. but we have these now. http://s5h.net/u?b9a

    1. Re:not new by grommit · · Score: 1

      Thank you Captain Obvious. However, anybody who read the article summary (not you apparently) would know that it's already being used in Europe.

      What's different is that this is the first installation in North America where there is quite a taboo against urinating in public here.

  13. Pointless by DarthChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People who to drunk to care will do it wherever (or piss their pants if they're completely wasted).

    People who are desperate because there's no open public toilets will continue to (attempt to) hide behind a tree, bus stop or anything else.

    --
    Don't you just hate it when people reply to your signature?
    1. Re:Pointless by eneville · · Score: 1
      while (typeid(this) == single) { printf("Still single :("); }
      cute, but: while (typeid(this) == single) { fprintf( stdout, "Still single :(\n" ); } might be an improvement, printf doesnt have the ability to flush the output buffer like fflush(stdout); has.
    2. Re:Pointless by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

      Being modded "insightful" in such a topic as public peeing can't be good for your karma...

  14. Now where's that universal remote control ? by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    I like to use it when I'm near such a urinal to lower it down, especially when people are peeing ;=)
     

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  15. Why So Complex? by niXcamiC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here in Guatemala, we just have a spiral shaped wall, with a urinal in the centre. Way cheaper, and you can use it in the day.

    --
    Chances are any disscution on Slashdot will degrade into a flamewar about ID/Christianity within 14 posts.
    1. Re:Why So Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had this same thing in the Netherlands when I visited in 2000. As an added bonus they drained directly into the canals :-P

    2. Re:Why So Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because we used to have plenty of simple, very distinctive urinals right in Amsterdam itself. In fact a few of them remains, one of them on Koningsplein. It is a green painted metal structure that basically allows two men at time to enter a semi enclosed space to do their business. Been around forever.

      Just that they disappeared over recent years because they were considered not to be needed or to spoil the look of the street.

      So why not simply bring them back? Well because that would be admitting that removing them in the first place was a failure and if you admit something is a failure you might have to take action against the person who took this action.

      That is a no-no in politics. So we get over-engineered solutions to problems that had already been solved decades before because that way you can pretend the solutuion is all new and original.

      Someday someone will probably come up with a robot restroom assistent who will accept a quarter per visit and provide all sexes with a public facility to relieve themselves say near busy areas or in parks. lets call the public restroom 3000! Nothing like those old messy public restrooms with an old lady keeping the place tidy who was fired because the manager of public works wanted a raise so he had to cut manpower.

    3. Re:Why So Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ma nacatau ru li cuatin? Q'ue jun chic ana'leb re tinnau nak nacatau ru li cuatin Lain.

    4. Re:Why So Complex? by ml10422 · · Score: 1

      You and your ID-believing Latin American brethren should be banned from Slashdot. The nerve! Solving a problem without using servo motors, embedded processors, and blinkenlights!

    5. Re:Why So Complex? by deblau · · Score: 1

      Here's a public urinal in Amsterdam: pic. I used one of these the last time I was there, very convenient.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    6. Re:Why So Complex? by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      I was in Amsterdam in August, I was staying right by the Singel canal. They still have the old green-painted urinals there, very useful too! There were few others around but, like many first-time tourists in Amsterdam, I was not 100% alert to recall exactly where they were;-)

    7. Re:Why So Complex? by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      Thats in the middle of the redlight district you filthy...... oh wait...

    8. Re:Why So Complex? by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned, they also have these spiral designs in the Netherlands. Here is a pic of one in Amsterdam

      And even better, check out this picture of a sign in amsterdam pointing to one. I love the iconography.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  16. Disappear during the day, and appear at night... by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...just like Urinus appears every night in the starry skies.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  17. Bellagio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now just to wait for a geek to hack a remote control sequence, and film the urinals doing the Bellagio Fountains.

  18. make your own remote! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be interesting to see if they did anything to secure the 'remote' signal.
    If they haven't (and offcourse even if they have) it would be possible to make your own remote :)

    Then even during the day you can have your very own urinal up within minutes :)

    1. Re:make your own remote! by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      You'd probably need to obtain an actual transmitter. Even assuming it's RF, just plugging broadband antenna into a spectrum analyser might not work; the control signal probably would not last as long as the analyser's sweep time, so you'd miss it.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  19. Oslo public toilet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are fully automatic (doors slides open) and cleans themselves after you have left.

    http://www.arkh.no/design_3_toalett.php?1=toalett

    Also works for handicapped

  20. And this is different than the pissoirs in Europe? by the_rajah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Other than the obvious "high tech" aspect to these pissoirs and having them only available at night which just doesn't make sense to me, since I occasionally have to urinate during daylight hours.

    I've also seen these in North African countries that I've visited like Tunisia and Morocco. I'm guessing the French brought the concept.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  21. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it would be possible to record the signals from the remote, then use tem to lower the urinal as drunkards piss in them?

  22. Sounds like uromycitisis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I feel for you, bro, I feel for you. I too suffer from a similar condition, prostatitis, and my condition requires that I jackoff 5-8 times a day to keep the seminal fluid pressure at a reasonable level. Public restrooms are a godsend for people with my condition. Of course, people look at me kind of funny when they walk in and see me over by the sinks with a picture of Kathleen Fent in one hand and me furiously jacking off my cock in the other hand, but hey it is a medical condition and there isnt much to be done, except for the public restrooms that are equiped with glory holes. TFA didnt mention whether these hi-tech urinals will have any provisions for glory holes. Hope so. Anyway, best wishes to you and yours with that uromycitisis.

    1. Re:Sounds like uromycitisis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > I too suffer from a similar condition, prostatitis, and my condition requires that I jackoff 5-8 times a day to keep the seminal fluid pressure at a reasonable level. Public restrooms are a godsend for people with my condition. Of course, people look at me kind of funny when they walk in and see me over by the sinks with a picture of Kathleen Fent in one hand and me furiously jacking off my cock in the other hand, but hey it is a medical condition and there isnt much to be done, except for the public restrooms that are equiped with glory holes.

      Aha! So Taco does post anon! (Or does Hemos have something he wants to confess?)

      (Seriously. +6, Fucking Hysterical if this becomes a Slashdot cliche.)

  23. Cambridge, UK, has "Pee Pods" by bestinshow · · Score: 1

    Yup, they get dropped off in high-guman-traffic areas for Friday and Saturday nights. They're plastic, no technology. You piss into the recepticle (a pee pod has a receptible on each of its sides) and the piss accumulates in the middle in some form of tank. Then they're collected in the early morning. The recepticle is large enough to vomit into too.

    Very Cheap. Low-tech. Sucks if you're female though.

    One of the locations is outside the public toilets, which are locked at night to stop bum banditry and drug abuse (the toilets have needle bins).

  24. Re: The World's Most-High Tech Urinal by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The bums still pee in the public parking elevators. That's about as high tech as it gets here for public peeing.

  25. begging for a deuce by LeonardsLiver · · Score: 1

    "how would YOU like it... mkay... if some PRANKSTER ... mkay... came along and pinched off a big, steamy chud in YOUR high tech urinal..."

    1. Re:begging for a deuce by lloydsmart · · Score: 1

      lol! That was a good episode!

  26. Mysogeny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo, dawg, my fly bitch be wantin' 2 kno, how's dem hoes gonna spray if theze pissoirs b dezigned 4 tha dingleberry holdin' set? I almost had 2 lay down tha pimpsmack b4 she recognized that bruthas rule this here world and hold that fat wallet, homie. Keep ur mind on the green, not the in-between. Word! Peace out.

  27. Europe already has this??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the article, this is already install in Holland. Amazing what the Dutch will tolerate for a good time.

      song-lirics.com/

  28. too bad they didn't do this with public phones by cucucu · · Score: 1

    today with cellphones, who uses them? they should be 24 hours below ground.

    1. Re:too bad they didn't do this with public phones by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      today with cellphones, who uses them? they should be 24 hours below ground.

      Foreign tourists that have GSM phones that don't work on US frequencies. People whose cellphone battery is dead and don't want to pay ass-raping rates for a quick charge. People who don't need a cell phone for work and don't want to pay $40/mo for a service they don't often use, yet need to make phone calls outside of home. People who want to remain anonymous - say, when giving a tip to the police about a prominent politician. Need I go on?

      Besides, how is using a pay phone comparable to pissing in the street?

      -b.

  29. Public places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Public Toilet Design: From Hotels, Bars, Restaurants, Civic Buildings and Businesses Worldwide (Trends in Architecture)

    " Most people do not like talking about their bodily functions, and bathrooms have traditionally been relegated to a secondary position as far as the design of public spaces is concerned. Public toilets are generally associated with cold, often anti-hygienic spaces that foment delinquency, perversion and vandalism. Nevertheless, bathrooms not only form part of our everyday life but also reflect the evolution of our hygiene, as well as expressing our cultural identities to such an extent that they form part of the history of civilization.

    In recent years, bathrooms have been subject to greater attention on the part of designers, who give full rein to their creativity to turn bathrooms into an experience for the senses imbued with great artistic value. This book presents a selection of very diverse projects in which bathrooms enjoy a special status as a vehicle for emotions, various artistic and cultural expressions, corporate values and the requirements of different social groups. Particular attention has been paid to the latter, as the needs of a male user are not the same as those of a woman, child, senior citizen or handicapped person -- and the design of a lavatory must take these characteristics into account. Over the course of four chapters Leisure and Culture, Residential Bathrooms, Working Environment and Commuting Spaces -- follows a global survey of bathrooms belonging to different types of buildings, including bars, restaurants, theaters, gyms, offices, hospitals, kindergartens, public institutions, airports and train stations, with special emphasis on the means used to bring together creativity and functionality.

    It seems that designers are gradually rebelling against the taboos which dictate when, where, how and with whom we should relieve ourselves, and are converting a visit to the bathroom into not just a satisfaction of physical needs but also a pleasant experience. "

  30. What if you have to go during the day ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Ghent, Belgium you have the same only a bit more low-tech.
    But it has a higher 'up-time' and takes less personnel to operate. So why bother?

  31. Isn't this the wrong approach? by Channard · · Score: 2

    I mean, if you to get to an indoor toilet before you wet yourself, then you shouldn't have drunk so much in the first place. But given how we've now got things like 'do not ram in eye' labels on knives etc, it's not surprising that we're catering to the lowest common denominator.

    1. Re:Isn't this the wrong approach? by statusbar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting that it only caters to males, and not females... Is that an insult to males pee habits? or is it sexism against females because it is not inclusive?

      --jeffk++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    2. Re:Isn't this the wrong approach? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Interesting that it only caters to males, and not females...

      How long before the cities that install them get sued for discrimination? Not to mention all the handicapped people who can't stand up to pee...

      -b.

    3. Re:Isn't this the wrong approach? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      But given how we've now got things like 'do not ram in eye' labels on knives etc

      I think that's been updated to 'do not ram in remaining eye' now.

    4. Re:Isn't this the wrong approach? by yabos · · Score: 1

      It's probably something to do with it being easier to maintain. You're not touching anything with your ass so they don't have to clean it as often. Although I'm sure some prick will shit on the floor or something sick like that(seen it in a few public washrooms before)

    5. Re:Isn't this the wrong approach? by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the line in braille for those poor sods that failed to heed the warning the first two times...

    6. Re:Isn't this the wrong approach? by dubbreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was brought up locally (I'm a Victorian) and the arguement is the public urination problem in the downtown core is due to male urination not female, hence the focus on male urination. I am sure the standup urinals could be used by adventureous females, the same ones who would actually go squat in an alley (face away from urinal and bend over slightly?).

      In all honesty it is not fair, but it is an ends to a mean. The organisers only care about preventing more public urination, not making it easier for all people to find a public facility. And if you want to talk about discrimination the system also discriminates against those who have to take a #2. Luckily Victoria doesn't have a public defecation problem so that wasn't considered either.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:Isn't this the wrong approach? by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      Oops. Means to and end, or end justifies the mean, surprised I didn't get flamed on my messed up idiom.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    8. Re:Isn't this the wrong approach? by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      As soon as it crosses 49 degrees latitude and comes within reach of the bloodthisrty litigation lawyers in the good old U.S.A.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  32. Virtual Urinal by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

    At least the high tech model is more usable than this this one.

  33. How long before... by Nemetroid · · Score: 0

    How long before we have a jackass episode spending one full day in one of these?

  34. it speaks of intelligent design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the sex that urinates in public is also the sex that can pee standing up.

  35. Don't be silly.. by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. girls don't pee. They expel all waste products as a pine-smelling vapour emitted through their pores.

    1. Re:Don't be silly.. by wboelen · · Score: 1

      Could you tell me what planet you're from? Otherwise I can't make an overlord joke.

    2. Re:Don't be silly.. by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      girls don't pee. They expel all waste products as a pine-smelling vapour emitted through their pores.

      I am skeptical since most slashdotters are not experts in female anatomy, inventing wild nerban rumours.

    3. Re:Don't be silly.. by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      So that's why I'm gay! I hate pine!

      ;-)

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
    4. Re:Don't be silly.. by funfail · · Score: 1

      You have to make the joke about pine-smelling vapour-emitting girl overlords, and everybody knows that they are from Venus.

  36. Hardly pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Public urinals used to be pretty common at least in Amsterdam, so did public toilets for that matter. The latter were cut as part of cost cutting because employing someone usefully and providing a needed public service is so much worse then giving the manager of public works a raise.

    urinals themselves were also often considered an eyesore by some and so whenever streetworks caused them to be temporarily disappear they wouldn't be replaced and we ended up with less and less of them.

    Then someone noted that people now started peeing against buildings and voila, expensive study, failing countermeasures and finally the installation of high expensive replacement of the urinals that cost a fraction and had been there decades before some bureaucrat thought they needed to go.

    It tells you everything you need to know about goverment. Phase out a much need public service, watch it go to rot, spend a fortune on analysing it and finally at great expense reintroduce it claiming you have invented it all a new.

  37. I have a legitimate question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why in the hell are incentivating people not to wash their hands after they take a piss!?!? It already freaks me out when it happens in restaurants (specially when waiters do it), but now I can't shake hands with anyone on the street at night?

    1. Re:I have a legitimate question by X-treme-LLama · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll grant you waiters and anyone handling my food. Other than that, why? I shower once daily and put my dick into a clean pair of boxers. My hands touch all sorts of dirty filthy crap during the course of the day. My johnson however (unless its a crazy day) stays tucked safely in said boxers until I take it out to pee. My johnson is probably thousands of times cleaner than my hands. If anything I should wash my hands BEFORE I touch it. But afterwards? I'm not catching anything from it, so unless I pissed all over my hands what's the point?

      Jeez people, it's just skin.

      Oh, and for the record, urine is generally sterile unless it picks up bacteria while exiting through the urethra. Well if you're dirty or diseased you should be washing anyway.

    2. Re:I have a legitimate question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, I wash my hands prior, not after peeing. If anyone inquires as to why I don't wash after I tell them that when I grew up, we were taught not to pee on our hands ;)

    3. Re:I have a legitimate question by kirun · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why? Ask The Straight Dope. (Text on page is NSFW)

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    4. Re:I have a legitimate question by mspohr · · Score: 1
      I used to work in a hospital ER and would ALWAYS wash my hands BEFORE using the bathroom (in addition to after and many other times during the day.)

      Urine is sterile (unless you have an infection) but the problem is the proximity to the sewage outlet. As some wit has remarked... "who would have designed a major recreation area next to the water works and the sewage outlet?"

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:I have a legitimate question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When working as a chemist I always washed my hands BEFORE peeing to ensure no nasty chemicals would get on sensitive parts. (Also to avoid ingestion of toxics by my partner when I got home.) Pretty much every chemist I knew had the same habit. Its a good idea when working as a cook as well, especially when working with spicy foods, with the afterwards hand washing being more important than when working as a chemist.

    6. Re:I have a legitimate question by tm1rules · · Score: 1

      Dude, I can whip it out and tuck it back in without touching it.

    7. Re:I have a legitimate question by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      That's about the dumbest explanation I've ever read. To summarize:

      1. Skin on the private parts hosts lethal bacteria.
      2. This bacteria can't be washed off no matter what.
      3. It does, however, transfer instantaneously to your hands when you touch it.
      4. After touching your penis, you become a "Typhoid Mary".
      5. Those bacteria that couldn't be washed off before are now easily washed off the hands.

      You would think that anyone who ever gave a blow/rim job would end up dead. Apparently the touching someone's genitals is a death sentence for anyone not trained in sterile techniques. It's not just penises according to the article, it's all skin (male or female) in proximity to the anus. We've got to stop shitting all over ourselves!

      I guess by "Straight Dope" he means he's a heterosexual fool.

    8. Re:I have a legitimate question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That site is a load of bullshit, I couldn't help but laugh while reading it. He basically said coliform bacteria will kill you, so never ever touch your penis!

      Thats why I loved reading one of the replies he got:

      Dear Cecil:

      After reading your column on hand washing after urination, I'm certain I'm going to die--that is, if coliform bacteria are as bad as you say. My girlfriend and I often share the pleasures of fellatio and cunnilingus. Heck, one night I even got up the nerve to perform (ahem) analingus. But what about the dread coliform bacteria? I'm certain some of these bacteria came in contact with our mouths at some time. Yet I have never been sick due to these forms of sexual gratification. Do we just swallow it and put it back where it came from (our intestines) or what? Please don't tell me I have to refrain from yet another fun thing to do. --Matt Hostetler

      I think this guy put it best, if there is indeed a deadly level of coliform bacteria on your penis (that you can't wash off), how then, are millions of women able to perform oral sex on their man without dying or becoming ill? This Cecil guy sounds like a religious nut that is trying to scare people away from sex.
  38. Peeing for free is an American right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people just don't want to buy a cafe milky or pay 50cents (euro) to use a nice warm cozy pisser in a pot-filled establishment is beyond me.

  39. Hygiene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only person concerned that it doesn't allow you to wash your hands?

    And before anyone says "I don't make it a habit to piss on my hands" their main use is for drunk people.

    The urinals are already hooked up to the main water supply, how hard would it be to add some kind of sensor to detect when a person puts their hands under the faucet?

    1. Re:Hygiene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would probably put an empty beer cans under the faucet and flood the entire unit.

  40. Re: The World's Most-High Tech Urinal by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

    The bums still pee in the public parking elevators. That's about as high tech as it gets here for public peeing.

    And it too goes up and down!

  41. Did you even RTF Summary? by melstav · · Score: 1
    The summary doesn't claim that they are anything new. What's "new" is the fact that this is the first time these have been installed on our side of the pond.

    The $75,000 system has been installed across the Netherlands, and have spread to London and Belfast, but Victoria will be the first North American city to try them out."


    Granted, the summary specifically mentions that they have been installed in London, after mentioning that they have been "installed across the Netherlands" -- leading people to assume that London is the ONLY UK city they've been installed in.

    This could be a simple omission, or it could be an artifact of a USian-centric viewpoint. After all, according to Google Maps London and Reading are only 42.4 miles (~68 km) apart. By our standards, that makes Reading a suburb of London.... and it's common practice to refer to an entire metropolitan area (a city and all of its suburbs) under the name of the main city. So... following that practice, Reading is part of London.

    1. Re:Did you even RTF Summary? by eneville · · Score: 1
      This could be a simple omission, or it could be an artifact of a USian-centric viewpoint. After all, according to Google Maps London and Reading are only 42.4 miles (~68 km) apart. By our standards, that makes Reading a suburb of London.... and it's common practice to refer to an entire metropolitan area (a city and all of its suburbs) under the name of the main city. So... following that practice, Reading is part of London.
      that 42 miles is about 3 hours of driving time. i take a great offence that you think it's london... given that the uk is only 6 times that wide in places.

      people in london have a much more pronounced london accent than us reading folk. berkshire born and berkshire bred, strong in the arm, thick in the head.

      reading falls within the thames valley, although the thames does run through london, and at times has washed raw sewage back into london.

      i think the uk would fall into something the size of texas twice maybe.

    2. Re:Did you even RTF Summary? by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      Texas is 700,000 square kilometres. The UK could fit in it three times over.

      Distances are different in the colonies. 1000km is a quick weekend drive, 42 miles is an easy commute.

    3. Re:Did you even RTF Summary? by melstav · · Score: 1

      My intent was not to offend, but to simply elaborate on the thought process that might have gone into that writeup. If I offended you, I apologise.

      Is it really 3 hours from Reading to London? What's the speed limit on M-4? Your average highway in the US has a limit between 55 and 70 mph.

      Few people quite grasp just how immense the US is compared to most other countries... and the things it does to the average US-ian's world-view...

      The UK has a landmass of 244,820 km^2 (94,526 mi^2). That puts the UK at being about 2,500 mi^2 smaller than Oregon (96,981.00 mi^2) Texas is the second-largest state, at 267,338 mi^2 of landmass.

      --
      Someone who speaks three languages is trilingual.
      Someone who speaks two languages is bilingual.
      Someone who only speaks one language is "a typical American".

    4. Re:Did you even RTF Summary? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Is it really 3 hours from Reading to London? What's the speed limit on M-4? Your average highway in the US has a limit between 55 and 70 mph.

      M4 speed limit is 70mph (same for all motorways). But you'll find that if you commute into London, speed limits are rarely something you need be concerned about, as your chances of exceeding them are vanishingly small. I used to commute out of London up the M25, and the traffic on the other side (going into London) usually resembled a car park.

    5. Re:Did you even RTF Summary? by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

      The M4 is 70 mph for most of the length out to reading, but traffic never gets that fast. Ever. Living in Ealing (a real suburb of London) we consider reading a sperate entity entirly, as is anywhere else outside the M25. (It is however the only place outside London you can buy tube tickets.)

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    6. Re:Did you even RTF Summary? by eneville · · Score: 1
      The M4 is 70 mph for most of the length out to reading, but traffic never gets that fast. Ever. Living in Ealing (a real suburb of London) we consider reading a sperate entity entirly, as is anywhere else outside the M25. (It is however the only place outside London you can buy tube tickets.)
      i often find it cheapest, when using the train, to get the rail ticket to paddington and then get the travel card at the ticket office there. but i suppose it has a lot to do with the journey one makes. greetz from thatcham.
  42. Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chow's ego is already so large that he advertises his blog with google adwords. I think a link from slashdot might cause his hands to go green and swell up.

    If only his writing was as good as his instinct for self promotion.

  43. Hack it! by Stormx2 · · Score: 1

    Find the remote control frequency =)

  44. Re:And this is different than the pissoirs in Euro by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    Other than the obvious "high tech" aspect to these pissoirs [google.com] and having them only available at night which just doesn't make sense to me, since I occasionally have to urinate during daylight hours.

    You have apparently not been through large cities very often. I'm staying in the Hilton hotel in San Mateo, CA on a weekend getaway with my lovely wife. (She's sleeping in upstairs) Going through San Fransisco, we hit several of the "economically disadvantaged" areas, and the smell of old urine was frequently strong and rank. Not just "oh, this is bad", but "I'm so glad I haven't eaten for several hours because if I'd eaten recently I'd hurl it all over the sidewalk" bad.

    It's obvious that public urination isn't an issue for many of the street dwellers, but the foul odors are an issue for everybody else. The price is a bit high - why not just put the urinals on the side of the buildings and have doors that close? Spending that much money PER URINAL could get rather prohibitive...

    PS: You don't want these open in the daytime - that would leave a strong implicit message that swinging out the member and taking a leak in broad daylight is perfectly OK...

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  45. Off the Streets, Into the Ocean by NotWallaceStevens · · Score: 1

    Since Victoria dumps billions of liters of its raw sewage directly into the Strait of Juan de Fuca after filtering out the chunks, what they really need is a treatment plant that disappears from view instead of robotic urinals.

  46. The main site by houghi · · Score: 1
    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  47. What about in winter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frosty Piss!!!!111

  48. Here's real high tech for urination by megazoid81 · · Score: 2, Informative

    First, there is the computational urinal from the MIT Media Lab, called You're In Control (Urine Control). More information at the project's web site. The urinal has a screen above it, and you can play video games by appropriately directing your urine stream.

    Then, less high tech, but still very useful is the p-mate, which is a device that permits women to pee standing up. Now, if only there could be a device for men to get multiple orgasms.

    1. Re:Here's real high tech for urination by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      Now, if only there could be a device for men to get multiple orgasms.

      Something like this, perhaps?

      "Some men on cabergoline are able to have numerous multiple orgasms in rapid succession."
      http://www.cabergoline.org/

  49. No joke? by deficite · · Score: 1

    Tell me this is a joke......this is really sad.......and sounds fun at the same time! :) Perfect for the drunk people who are already inclined to exhibitionism.

  50. Who wants public urination? by slurry47 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, you're probably correct associating our countrywide genital shame with the pervasive religious majority.

    Who wants public urination at all? Not me. A little modesty, attributable to whatever source, keeping you from pissing in front of me is a good thing.

    This is a cool product, addressing an icky problem -- I'd just hate to see these installed unnecessarily, actually encouraging people to relieve themselves in public.

    These things need all the hookups that a standard bathroom requires -- water, sewer, power. Why not just put in some extra drains, like storm drains, in discreet locations? Maybe throw a wall in front of it? Some subtle public education would do the rest.

    --


    Dirt doesn't need luck.
  51. You get used to it... by coyotl · · Score: 1

    I used a urinal like this several times in Amsterdam, where they are even more exposed. Once you've gotten past the weirdness of using it the first time, you quickly get used to it.

    Frankly, these seem like a good idea, and we could use them here in San Francisco. (Our current enclosed 'euro-toilets' are mainly used by addicts for shooting up.) You would have to clean the pop-up street urinals daily, however. I can imagine that drunk party boys can't aim very well.

    --
    ron lussier / lenscraft / fine art giclee prints/ sausalito / ca
  52. Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a stupid idea that's bound to fall victim to vandalism, and it's already overly expensive in the first place. Consider that tax dollars are going to this. There are better cheaper solutions available or already in place. You can't even wash your hands and public pissing is an offence already. Are they trying to just cater to any idiotic habit, throwing money away on whatever Johnny-doesn't-care wants to do next?

  53. Wrong answer by alexhard · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is so terribly wrong I just can't find words to describe it..
    Maybe instead of spending big sums of money on hydraulic, public (WTF!) urinals it would be better to try and create a culture where people DON'T urinate in public places? Fucking barbarians..

    --
    Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    1. Re:Wrong answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err.. Fuck you?

    2. Re:Wrong answer by toddhisattva · · Score: 0
      Wow, this is so terribly wrong I just can't find words to describe it..
      Maybe instead of spending big sums of money on hydraulic, public (WTF!) urinals it would be better to try and create a culture where people DON'T urinate in public places? Fucking barbarians..
      Please don't insult barbarians by comparing them to these subhuman animals that foul their own nests!

      What kind of worthless garbage can't even reach this basic level of self-control?

      Really, these pissy monkeys should not even be treated as human.
    3. Re:Wrong answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe instead of spending big sums of money on hydraulic, public (WTF!) urinals it would be better to try and create a culture where people DON'T urinate in public places?" Although the article tries to show that this is being done for the benefit of drunken revellers, it's obvious to me as a resident of Victoria that this is more for homeless people. Vancouver, in their run up to the winter olympics, are trying to make their homeless population less visible. They are buying homeless people ferry tickets and sending them here, for "storage". Over the summer the homeless population magically increased by 300%. That's a whole lotta pissin' goin' on. Once they get here, they get marginalized further - shopping carts are being confiscated. I work in a pawn shop and have homeless people tell me that they need receipts for everything they buy. Why? Because the police here will take all of your stuff you don't have receipts for, and say "It's stolen" without a shred of proof. Since the victim is homeless, they can get away with it. This is also a city where it is illegal to sleep outside. I'm not joking. Of course, as you can imagine, this gives the cops a great pretext to arrest people, even if sleep is necessary to sustain life. It looks like these urinals are a sign that they plan to "store" even more homeless here over the next 4 years. Talk about a need for change in this culture. In the meantime, if you come to Victoria, watch your step, don't step on the syringes, that guy sleeping over there, or the urinals popping out of the ground.

    4. Re:Wrong answer by Noishe · · Score: 1

      Yes well you see, Victoria has a unique situation. Every city all around us is cold and wet. Vancouver rains non stop, and every other city has one nasty ass cold winter while victoria snows once every 5 years, and then the snow lasts two days max.

      Because of our unique weather situation, the homeless from just about all of bc and probably from other provinces and washington too, all deside to move and take up residence on the streets. We have the highest homelessness rate in canada because they all emigrate to our mild climate.

      I agree though about spending the money on toilets... 75000 for a single toilet? fuck, i could build and install tons of them for that much money.

  54. Interesting by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    Will this be the beginning of more profound changes in the image of the cities between day and night?. Perhaps boutiques can hide underground to leave place to pubs, fountains can dissapear to leave place to an ice skating ring... The possibilities are endless :-)

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  55. What a waste of money... piss on bushes and trees! by tuomas_kaikkonen · · Score: 1

    I would say, this is a waste of public money. Keep trees and bushes and let the people piss on the trees and bushes, like any other reasonable and sensible nature loving animal would do! Of course, it may not work for the number two, unless there are some dumpsters provided that actually compost the humanure and turn it into good soil for more trees and bushes.

    I am not sure about urinals, but if you put public toilets, Seattle Times reported a problem here in Seattle, prostitutes and drug addicts abusing them for their own purposes for unlimited amount of time, forcing some homeless people to take even more dumps into the wild outside the public sewage system.

    So, while perhaps saving the homely people the unwelcome whiff of the smell of the homeless pee, installing urinals does NOT alleviate the problem of homeless crap. However, if urinals are public enough (no walls) they may perhaps NOT be abused for prostituting and drug users.

    Allright, now once I have submitted a reply, I go and read the original article to learn more about the system.

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. OMG! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    Before viewing this video, I didn't realize the extent and urgency of the public urination problem! Now it is clear that our governments must do everything in its power to protect us from this scourge! I will gladly give up my privacy and other rights, if pissing in public is what it takes to keep our country safe from these malicious urinators who seek to undermine our continence.

    From now on, people will only talk of two eras: before the urilift, and after!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Re: The World's Most-High Tech Urinal by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    America?

    Ohmigosh ... was that ... an America-bash?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  60. A traumatic experience waiting to happen by TastyCakes · · Score: 3, Funny

    No joke. Just don't use it at twilight or you get stuck in a urinal for 12 hours.

    1. Re:A traumatic experience waiting to happen by hcob$ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, the next version is the pay toilet that locks you in UNTIL you pay the fee. After a certain amount of time with non-payment, the machine just happens to "leak" previous customers "deposits" all over you.

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    2. Re:A traumatic experience waiting to happen by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      If any of you had watched the article, you'd know that they need to have a person lower them, they don't lower automatically. So unless there's some dickhead being malicious like the aforementioned jackass university student, that's not going to happen.

      However, they apparently raise automatically, so depending on how much upward pressure they exert before they realize there's an obstacle and abort (assuming that they do, which you'd reasonably expect) it could be ugly if you parked over one.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  61. Details: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The attentant is a safety measure. This is a hydraulticly-driven device, and should a drink lose conciousness and collapse against one it would be quite capable of removing his head the next morning. Thus an operator wanders around each time they must be raised or lowered to inspect for damage or debree.

    2. This isn't really a loss of taboo, but an admission of defeat to them: A urinal which disappears in the day, rather than staying to remind people of both biological reality and the messyness of others. If the objective was to provide public urinals alone, then it would have been easy to install them long ago. But it is only now someone has found a way to keep them out of sight - and out of mind - that people have begun to seriously consider them.

  62. Excellent Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should make sure a sensor prevents someone's leg getting caught in the lift when it lowers,
    and a sensor to make sure it doesn't pop up with someone standing (or a car parked) on top of the lift.

    I would suggest they make the American lifts diameter a little wider, Americans tend to be fat.

    Better yet: Zoning laws requiring bars and dance places to build rest room facilities that are oversized and large enough to handle a full capacity night of drinking men, and double that for the women, who always end up waiting in line to use the facilities!

    Poor Drunken ladies, no respect!

  63. Problem.. by Anonymous+Cumshot · · Score: 1

    And what happens if someone is standing in one early in the morning when it submerges? Will he be trapped inside underground?

    What a way to go..

    --
    Best regards, A.C.
  64. Georgia Tech... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...had a much lower-tech version at least 48 years ago, and still does AFAIK. Dorm residents used a pedestrian tunnel under the Atlanta Expressway (believe it's I-75 now) to reach Duffy's Tavern, the one bar in the neighborhood that kept the cops greased so it could serve beer to underage students. It was about a quarter mile walk with no legitimate pissers anywhere, so we just used the tunnel. Whenever the smell got overpowering, the fire department would flush it with the big hose.

    rj

    1. Re:Georgia Tech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tunnel is still there, and it still smells faintly of pee. I think mostly it's just a good place to get mugged though, which is probably why it has gates on both sides that can be pulled down to block it off.

  65. Re:Another observation (can you get trapped in it? by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1

    Simple infra-red sensor similar to what is used on motorized revolving doors. If there is anybody within the vicinity, no motion.

  66. $75,000? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    You can send a kid from a poor background to university for that amount of money. Full scholarship to any state university in the US. You can even buy a house some places for that much. $75k is a lot to spend on a glorified pissing post. And this isn't even counting the yearly maintenance to the hydraulics and self cleaning gizmos.

    -b.

  67. Japan worried? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Japan has to be worried. They have always been at the forefront of high-tech toilets and urinals. Is this their Sputnik? (Or is it "Sputternik" here?)

  68. bad design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    plastuit.nl: best viewed with internet explorer 4+

    crikey! if they design the website for IE4, one must imagine the plastuit itself is guaranteed to generate a little backflow and sidespray. (no mention of viruses or popups...)

  69. Great way to get robbed! by bigbird · · Score: 1

    You're kind of busy, with your back to the street in a very public place at night. You've probably had a drink and not as aware as you might be normally. Chances are someone will steal your wallet and you won't be able to do much immediately. Unless you fancy running down the street dribbling with your fly open.

    1. Re:Great way to get robbed! by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      I'd turn around, pee on the bastard, then punch him in the face.

      A few times like that should be discouraging enough.

  70. Not always so easy by phorm · · Score: 1

    The problem with some areas of major cities - and I have had this problem in downtown Vancouver (a short ferry ride away from Victoria) - is that it is sometimes hard to find a place to use the washroom, and not just if you're drunk. There's quite often issues with addicts etc using the washroom facilities to shoot up in private, so many establishments will have the washrooms locked, requiring you get a key at the front desk. Quite often, they will also require you to make a purchase beforehand.

    Now normally this wouldn't be a big deal, but when you really really need to take a leak (perhaps that venti-sized Starbucks apple cider just kicked in 15 minutes later) having to wait in line to be serviced in order to get the can really sucks. I haven't quite had an incident where I have been unable to make it, but it's come close enough that things have gone from the level of "unconfortable" to well near painful. I remember the days when it wasn't a big deal to stop at the corner store if you needed to take a leak, now half of them don't even *have* public washrooms. And again, I'm not talking about being drunk and needing to pee, just needing to go with some pressing urgency

    Holding in one's bladder does enough to reduce mobility. I could see how those with some mobility disablement etc would find these devices very useful.

    1. Re:Not always so easy by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      This isnt a solve-all, but it seems reasonable that you'd like to wash your hands before being served at an eatery - so go in, but dont ask for the restroom, ask for a table, and then also mention you'd like to use the washroom first. After you've done your business, up to you wether to remain there and order something, or to simply split.

  71. Don't forget to register by bwd234 · · Score: 1

    I can't wait til it comes to the USA and guys start getting arrested for public urination and then have to register as sex offenders.
    Yes, they have to now if they are caught pissing in public, like what the fuck does taking a wizz have to do with sex?

  72. Re:Victoria? by mikerm19 · · Score: 1

    Yes, you are missing 4th grade Geography.

    The continent containing Canada and USA is called North America. So yes, Victoria is in fact a North American city, even though it lies in Canada, the country.

  73. Re:Victoria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

  74. What if I was standing on top of the thing ? by copdk4 · · Score: 1

    waiting to pee..will it lift me up into air? and cannot get down without breaking my legs?

  75. Impose the costs in liquor sellers. by Animats · · Score: 1

    Simple solution: if you sell liquor, you have to provide public restrooms.

    The JCDecaux line of Automated Public Conveniences are fine, but too expensive. Most US cities insist on installing the giant self-cleaning wheelchair-accessable unit, which is the size of a parking space and costs about $65,000 per year, with maintenance. European installations usually have the smaller "pillar" unit.

    The JCDecaux units work OK, but they're not designed for volume production. I've seen the internals of the machinery, and it's made out of standard Telemecanique industrial automation components. There's nothing wrong with that for a one-off design, but if you built a washing machine from that product line, it would cost at least $5000 and be twice as big as it should be.

    New York City is going with a Cemusa design, from Italy. That's entirely advertising-supported.

  76. Urination by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Try and create a culture where people DON'T urinate in public places? What culture would that be? Every culture on earth has public urination. Expecting people to stop is like expecting people to not have premarital or non-reproductive sex. It's like expecting people to give up eating meat. It's like expecting people to not do things that are unhealthy, like smoking or taking drugs. It's just not going to happen, and the best thing you can possibly do is to divorce yourself of that fantasy right now. We're animals -- deal with it.

    1. Re:Urination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry dude, don't know where you come from but not everybody is a frickin' savage

  77. Eugenics by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    This is why eugenics would be a good idea -- to prevent stupidity like this.

    The article is VERY clear about this: the urinals don't raise and lower by themselves. They are operated by a remote control from a few feet away. So the attendant would be present and presumably see the unconscious gentleman. He could decide to lower it anyway, but that's really no different than you deciding to run down a drunk fellow who stumbles out into the road when you're driving at night.

    But thank you for the wonderful post! You successfully demonstrated that you didn't actually read the article -- making you an ignorant loudmouth Plus, you managed to disgrace yourself and your children for seven generations. Your family will be placed in the unclean caste and have to marry each other.

    Seriously, reading isn't as difficult as the president of the United States makes it look. It's actually well within the grasp of most people. Try it sometime, you might enjoy it.

    1. Re:Eugenics by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
      I suppose that to other people who hadn't read the article, it could have been hilarious. It's just that for those of us who read the articles (a vanishingly small percentage, to be sure), it just sounds stupid. There just isn't anything particularly funny about joking about what a machine might do if it were a completely different machine that operated in a radically different fashion. The automobile analogy makes perfect sense -- it refers to the fact that any incident involving someone getting pulled under would be deliberate. Your hands on the wheel of the car, deliberately steering towards the drunkard, versus the attendant's hands on the remote control, deliberately operating it so as to drag the drunkard down underground. See how that works? This isn't a urinal that automatically raises and lowers itself. It's not operated from an office miles away. It's operated by a guy standing ten feet away.

      Do you really think that I'm suggesting that there is a caste system that you should be subject to?! THAT was humour (irony, technically, since I meant something other than the literal meaning of what I was saying). Obviously no one is going to force you and your family to be swineherds (not that we even have swineherds in North America, or a caste system, or intergenerational transfer of disgrace, and only very little bit of inbreeding). The idea was to illustrate how dumb it is to not read the article, or to read the article and then make jokes that would only be funny to someone who hadn't read it and doesn't realize that the system doesn't actually operate in the manner that you imply. I'm thinking that maybe you're Indian, since you seem to take the idea of a caste system rather seriously, something that no westerner would even contemplate.

      But if you say that you read it, that's great. Go on making jokes that you try to pass off as being topical, but which actually refer to imaginary things that are completely different than what the article talks about. Just don't be suprised when people assume that you might be the kid that ate too much paste in kindergarten.

  78. Problem?! by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    Illiteracy is a serious problem.

    For the love of god, just read the fucking article. It's all there. Do you really think any city on Earth is dumb enough to build a device that would swallow people up and trap them beneath the Earth in a urine-filled coffin?

    You could have figured this out from the PICTURES alone. It is startling you were too lazy to even click the link and look at the pictures.

  79. Public urinals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just in Victoria last weekend and discovered that they have these, http://www.ralphkeyes.com/amsterdam/images/outdoor _urinal2.JPG as a pilot project to evaluate putting in the hydraluic version. They really aren't that embarassing to use and if they came with the p-cones that others have linked to, would also be female friendly. As for why the night-time avalability, Having them anywhere produces a Not In My Back Yard reaction from buisness'. Having them available only at night would help to minimize this, they also would feel less private during the day and project a day time image that the city doesn't desire.

    Just my .02 from using them and talking to the buisness'.

  80. Re:And this is different than the pissoirs in Euro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and having them only available at night which just doesn't make sense to me, since I occasionally have to urinate during daylight hours.

    You've never gone out drinking at night, have you?

  81. Why not just keep it underground? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Why not just keep it in the ground with a hole at the top so people would just aim for it while standing up?

    People needing privacy can pretend to sit down or lie down on the ground. The catch bag can then be pulled out and replaced.

    I can make one for 1/10th the price. Give me a shovel.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  82. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  83. Re:Another observation (can you get trapped in it? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    I for one am not totally adverse to a urinal that sucks ?

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  84. In India.... by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 0

    I read in the newspaper some time ago that in one of the cities in India they are combatting the problem of drunks urinating on the walls by plastering the walls with pictures of God. I couldn't find a link for it sorry. Maybe we could outsource the development of more pop-up toilets to India...

    --
    I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    1. Re:In India.... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      That is not possible. You cannot make a picture of God. And if you do, he throws a bolt of lightning at your head. Gosh, these darn polytheists really know f***all about religion :-P

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  85. i think that's me by ParProj · · Score: 1

    I lived in amsterdam last year. I'm feeling weird because the first guy in the video looks like me, but I can't be sure. Is that first wall the wall of Westerkerk near the Anne Frank Huis? Could it have been.. oh *!*

  86. Let's "go" outside? by tuxicle · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else get reminded of the George Michael video?

  87. What's Wrong with San Francisco's by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    We have a system where the urinals are sort of kiosk-like affairs. You put in a quarter (or a token for the homeless), the door opens, you go in and do your thing, you leave, the door closes and locks for a few minutes while the system steam-cleans the insides completely, then it's ready for the next customer.

    I've only used them a couple times, but they seem efficient - as long as they don't break down, which they do apparently.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  88. Doesn't work that way. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    I'm from Victoria.

    The problem is this: Drunks pissing in doorways. Not the homeless - drunks stumbling around after a night at the bar.

    Now, this is Victoria, and the mayor has realized that if they want to install a $75k urinal, then he's going to have to pay for it, and that means it's never, ever going to get done. What they have now - and what they will continue using for all time - is temporary urinals that don't hydraulically move. They will get hauled away by the public works staff every night.

    As for "drug use", another article in the TC (The Victoria Times Colonist) revealed that the problem with drug users and prostitutes is exaggerated. IIRC, they account for less than 1% of public bathroom traffic.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  89. Sewage in the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if only Victoria could do something about all that sewage it dumps straight into the ocean.

    How can such a beautiful and intelligent city still dump untreated sewage into salmon and whale migration routes!?!

  90. Eurotrash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        "America is sooo backwords. Europeans are so much more sophisiticated."

        Yeah, they can't keep from pissing in the streets, to the government gives them help doing it. That's some real sophistication there.

  91. misplaced hyphen by adavidw · · Score: 1

    The hypen's in the wrong place. It should be "Most High-Tech Urinal", not "Most-High Tech Urinal". I know the "editors" don't actually edit, but I'm wondering if they even have the necessary command of the language to edit should they choose to do so. Yeah, yeah, I must be new here...

  92. For 75,000 Let em Piss in the Streets... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    Talk about a waste of the taxpayers' money...If they want to piss in the streets then let them pay the fines or make them work off the debt by...you guessed it...cleaning up the streets.

  93. I'm a Barbarian by L0k11 · · Score: 1

    And I'm here to piss on your letterbox

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
  94. so late... by coquelicot · · Score: 1
    I have something like that in front of my building for more than a year (I live in The Netherlands).

    Looks like Europe is far more ahead than US/Canada at least in this technology... :-)

  95. We already have them by Wealcan · · Score: 1

    In my home city of Durham we have had these installed for a while. It's a shame that they are necessary but frankly they are better then the rivers of pee that used to run out of alleys and doorways after 11 o'clock! And if you are the one caught short on the way to the taxi rank, at least you don't have to worry about getting your collar felt by the boys in blue for peeing through the letterbox of Argos (disgusting, but I saw it happen...)

  96. Warning: Alien Technology! by bilgebag · · Score: 1

    All praise the Most-High!

  97. What about the three shells? by hellstorm · · Score: 1

    XD

    --
    --------------------------------------------------
    Programming is good for health
  98. Hi tech urinals by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or do other people get visions of men getting electric shocks up the privates here.

    should hi tech and urinals ever mix.

    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  99. Better than apartheid by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    Before this, there was only one thing from Dutch culture that had spread to become universally known: "apartheid". Now we also have this. I am so proud of being a Dutchie, you can't even imagine.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  100. Back off ! by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    That first wall looks like the wall of St Bavo in Haarlem. And that first guy looks like **me**. Really. I want my 15 minutes of fame. Now.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  101. I would like to reply, really by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    ... but I need to run to the toilet first.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  102. Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it make more sense to hire more police? You'd think they could even pay their salaries by giving enough public urination and/or drunkenness tickets. And a night in the hoosegow would make anyone think twice about urinating in public. Seems silly to spend $75K just to facilitate these people being idiots.
    But, that's just me.

  103. Re:Disappear during the day, and appear at night.. by identity0 · · Score: 1

    This man shall go down in history as the first one to come up with a pun on Uranus that didn't involve "anus". He deserves a Knighthood or a Presidential Medal of Freedom for that.

    I admit it's not a huge improvement, but any progress on the bad-Uranus-puns front should be rewarded.