Slashdot Mirror


Google Releases 'Testing on the Toilet'

JasonK writes "Here's a type of Google launch you don't see every day: Testing on the Toilet. This is a service that has been apparently been running internally for several months and teaching developers about testing during their 'down time,' so to speak. Due to the wild success of the program inside of Google, they decided to start a blog where they will post these weekly episodes so that the rest of us can print them out and have our own reading on the can. Is this a step towards Google becoming more open about their development practices?"

192 comments

  1. Huh? Wha? by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So now Google's gunning for Uncle John's Bathroom Reader ?

    Honestly, I don't see this as a positive development. My time on the pot is a time for reflection and grunting. If someone leaves the section with the comics and "Dear Abby" in the stall, I might elect to read, but I prefer to dump and run (TMI??). Also, knowing what Google employees are reading while they crap... Would "disquieting" be the right word for the sense of unease this gives me?

    - Greg

    1. Re:Huh? Wha? by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Weird, when I'm stuck on a tough problem I actually tend to go to the bathroom to solve it. No distractions or the like when you're on the john and you get the added bonus of feeling good (at least men do). I also take a shower to release tension. It's the perfect place to kick back and relax so you're not just grinding your teeth over it.

      Now having said that I don't want that stuff in the bathroom at work. I'd rather have a bit of peace than more work shoved at me ;).

    2. Re:Huh? Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I have a think while sitting on the can at work. More often, it's a nice little break from work.

    3. Re:Huh? Wha? by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would say it's normal for a few oddball ideas to emerge when a company has squeezed several successful projects out. They just get a little headstrong when they've been flush with good ideas lately.

    4. Re:Huh? Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      New products may make a splash, but pity the guy who has to examine the logs.

    5. Re:Huh? Wha? by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      I prefer to dump and run
      Same here. I've never understood this whole "toilet reading" phenomenon. When I have to take a shit, I sit down, dump, wipe, get up, and wash. Unless I'm sick or something, it never takes me long enough to sit and read or ponder anything; if not for the clean-up, it'd take about as much time as a typical piss. After all, it's not like it's an especially comfortable place to sit. Are people in general that more constipated than I am, do they have that much more difficulty finding "alone" time, or what?
      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    6. Re:Huh? Wha? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Funny

      No distractions or the like when you're on the john
      No distractions? The disgusting stench of your severely-overweight coworkers digestive malfunctions isn't a distraction? Did you try to launch fireworks out of your nose as a child?
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    7. Re:Huh? Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      None of the above. The real reason is that the toilet is a great place to wank =)

    8. Re:Huh? Wha? by loganrapp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or he's severely overweight with digestive malfunctions. You insensitive clod.

    9. Re:Huh? Wha? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't deny that I'm an insensitive clod (as many of my failed dates will attest(but seriously, get a real job girls(and a real degree(damn, i'm drunk right now, and i work in the morning(count those perens, you lisp bitches(i'm going to die alone :-())))))), but ridiculing the severely-obese could, possibly, motivate the fatties to stop killing themselves, thus saving decades of their lives.

      If your job doesn't afford you enough time to exercise (=1hr/night), QUIT because your life is worth more than an extra 20k/year!!!!!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    10. Re:Huh? Wha? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. In fact, I don't even sit down. Ever. I hover. So you better believe I'm not sticking around for long.

      A few times, for one reason or another, things have gone really slow in there, and afterwards my knees would start to buckle when I walked. Nothing like a little excrecise.

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    11. Re:Huh? Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Severely overweight? Have you SEEN the Google crowd? Probably one of the most attractive companies out there.

      Oh, wait - we're talking about the engineering sections?

      Never mind.

    12. Re:Huh? Wha? by jnana · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ha, that's funny! I too go to the bathroom for the peace and solitude that are so conducive to problem solving. It's also one of the few places where you can close your eyes, forget about the world, and really visualize and work on a tricky problem without (a) people thinking you're crazy because you're sitting there wide awake and perfectly still with your eyes closed or (b) interrupting you, intentionally or otherwise.

    13. Re:Huh? Wha? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No distractions or the like when you're on the john and you get the added bonus of feeling good (at least men do).
      Either you're very easily pleased, or else you're up to something other than normal toilet activities.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Huh? Wha? by iago-vL · · Score: 1

      Typically, people don't close the bracket used as an emoticon mouth. :P

    15. Re:Huh? Wha? by zerosix · · Score: 1

      I hope your not "working it out with a pencil"

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. ~Albert Einstein
    16. Re:Huh? Wha? by famikon · · Score: 0

      Typically, people don't count that type of thing either. Are you taking a parenthecencus?

    17. Re:Huh? Wha? by iago-vL · · Score: 1

      I copied it into vi :)

    18. Re:Huh? Wha? by j_snare · · Score: 1

      It's sad, but I recall a previous discussion on Slashdot about this very thing.

      It's a balance. You try to do it too fast and you could cause some damage to your system. But you sit there too long for no reason you can also cause damage of a different kind, and you waste time.

      You need to be relaxed and not pressure yourself, but get through it and off fairly quickly. Personally, I enjoy having something to read or do while I'm in there, even for only the couple of minutes I'm there. But I've always done that. Give me a 5 minute wait in a doctor's office and I'll have picked up and started reading the first thing I could get my hands on...

      As far as Google's tactic here, it sounds like they're short little quizzes on how stuff works and they're just something to spur some thought as you're there. I'd take something like that above the urinal if I could get it, just to make my trip in there more interesting. And if I've already got something on my mind, I'd just ignore it...

    19. Re:Huh? Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You try to do it too fast and you could cause some damage to your system.
      Getting a dump done quickly doesn't have to mean forcing it. Just wait until your colon says "Hey, I'm full here", and let peristalsis takes its course. As long as you're eating properly, it shouldn't take more than a minute.
    20. Re:Huh? Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My time on the pot is a time for reflection and grunting. Two words: mirror, fiber
    21. Re:Huh? Wha? by j_snare · · Score: 1

      As long as you're eating properly

      You must be new here.

      Seriously though, you're right. That's why generally I don't sit there very long. However, even with the short period, I prefer to be reading something. Additionally, sometimes things don't turn out quite that nicely.

    22. Re:Huh? Wha? by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      I prefer to dump and run
      Same here. I've never understood this whole "toilet reading" phenomenon. When I have to take a shit, I sit down, dump, wipe, get up, and wash. So you're the asshole! The proper procedure is "Shit, wipe, flush". If you continue to ignore company policy, you will be sent back to remedial training at your own expense. An instructional poster will be posted inside the stall by close of business.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    23. Re:Huh? Wha? by eyendall · · Score: 1

      Just what we need: more shitty software.

  2. This is easy for bosses to suggest... by jez9999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... considering most employees aren't half as anally-retentive as them.

  3. Somebody has to say it! by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2, Funny

    This idea may be a little shitty... We can't even just relax and clear our minds when we're layin' a brick?

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Somebody has to say it! by springbox · · Score: 1
      We can't even just relax and clear our minds when we're layin' a brick?

      Wait, what? Is that where bricks come from? I have to say I'm highly disturbed and hope you're not a contractor.

  4. Compare to Wiiing and weeing by tepples · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least testing PC software while taking a dump is easier than trying to control the pointing remote and a man's urine stream at once.

  5. Stupid questions by Bromskloss · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Is this a step towards Google becoming more open about their development practices?
    Why does every Slashdot story have to end with a question? Often an uninteresting one at that? Do you think it sounds more intellectual, encouraging a discussion, or what? Please stop it! (Also, please don't compose headlines consisting of a statement followed by a question mark?)
    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Stupid questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually a yes/no question as well. Which explains all the yes/no/maybe tags we find.

    2. Re:Stupid questions by Grey_14 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would imagine it's because slashdot is pretty centered around discussion of posted articles, the questions are in theory supposed to spark discussion about an article. Sadly most of the questions are stupid and people ignore them and ramble on about other stupid and pointless shit.

    3. Re:Stupid questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often an uninteresting one at that? Is this not a statement followed by a question mark?
    4. Re:Stupid questions by BarlowBrad · · Score: 1

      Can't one say anything, no matter the likelihood of inflammation (no pun intended), if it is phrased in the form of a question?

    5. Re:Stupid questions by Sterling2p · · Score: 1

      Another point that I have noticed, is that people answer the stupid question in the tag. So, if the question is not put there, the tags might be better used. Maybe we could test coming up with our own conversations close to the topic without a question as the GP noted.

    6. Re:Stupid questions by nmoog · · Score: 1

      It's because if you post a comment without a question, people will assume that you didn't stop to question the article yourself - buy asking questions in the summary it's like saying "Hey, I found this story... I don't necessarily agree with it - what do you think?" And there-by avoid the flames of hurtful slashdotters!

    7. Re:Stupid questions by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Why does every Slashdot story have to end with a question?
      It's actually quite useful. Typically, one would expect to want to read the article before reading the comments, in order to understand what's being discussed. However, if the article is totally off the mark, then either you can read it with a grain of salt, or you can skip straight to the comments to find out why it's wrong.

      The tags are useful at giving a one-word summary (fud/notfud/slashvertisement/pigpile) of whether the article has merit or not. Asking a yes/no/maybe question helps add an opportunity for more of this succinct information.

      In short: it saves time for lazy^W efficient bums like me.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    8. Re:Stupid questions by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
      You don't like people answering the lame question in a tag?

      It gives us a way to read stories which share something in common:

      Here are sets of stories that all have something in common. Lame questions. And it's funny how many stories are on all three lists!
    9. Re:Stupid questions by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Maybe you just discovered a pattern in the /. post (as I did, too) and are now just having the usual geek reflex 'hey, that's redundant!'. I think it does not hurt too much, at least the editors seem to get the dupes under control now :-)

  6. Really not good for your health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to recall having read something about how reading on the john is bad for you. The idea is that if you are constipated, you should wait for the movement, and not sit there and get all agitated and stressed. You are not supposed to push them out, as it can damage you and/or make the constipation worse in the long run. The article was written by a MD, IIRC. The one quote that sticks out in my mind is, "you wouldn't take a dump in the library, so don't read in the toilet".

    1. Re:Really not good for your health by jez9999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The idea is that if you are constipated, you should wait for the movement

      Isn't that the idea of the reading? To calmly wait?

      Also, your phobia of the words 'toilet' and 'shit' is humourous.

    2. Re:Really not good for your health by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      Well... First off this isn't what the article is about. Secondly you're not really "reading" if you're just sitting there with a book in your hand getting agitated and stressed. If you're constipated and you're reading on the pot you should be focusing on the book, not your bowel movement, that's the entire point of it. So you are waiting for the movement but you're not just sitting there feeling hopeless. I can't really comment on the article since you didn't provide a link but your summary leaves me to wonder how well the article was accepted by his peers.

    3. Re:Really not good for your health by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "The one quote that sticks out in my mind is, "you wouldn't take a dump in the library, so don't read in the toilet"."

      I thought it went: "I wouldn't swim in your toilet so don't piss in my pool" ?

      I personally like reading in the crapper, it takes my mind off of the business at hand (so to speak) and helps to relax.. but doing work on the crapper would have the opposite effect I would think. Eating on the crapper.. now that's just weird.

    4. Re:Really not good for your health by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      It's the best place to read I have a bookcase in mine

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    5. Re:Really not good for your health by kavau · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't get it. Why would reading on the toilet make me get agitated and stressed (unless I read my quarterly performance review, of course)? I'd be more inclined to just "push them out" if I didn't bring an article or book to read. So I'd say, NOT reading on the toilet is bad for you.

      I fully agree, though, that reading in the toilet can be bad for your health.

    6. Re:Really not good for your health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An enjoyable techincal book is just the thing to get my mind un-stressed when on the toilet (yes, I've tried other reading material for comparison).

    7. Re:Really not good for your health by nernie · · Score: 1

      They also have them in front of the urinals, i've heard.

    8. Re:Really not good for your health by springbox · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make any sense. I'd say the opposite is true. Anyway, I play a quick game on the DS instead of reading so sometimes I end up hanging around for a bit too long..

    9. Re:Really not good for your health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To clarify, I mean "calmly wait outside the john". Really, I don't mean "wait" at all, which implies that you're just killing time, looking forward for something to happen. What I mean is, do something else and an honest need to go presents itself, then you go. If you're on the pot, yeah, you're reading; but you're really thinking about going. If you're someplace else, you'll think of other things, and that's more likely to relax your entire system. I know a lot of people think they're relaxing in there, but there's a good chance that subconsciously, they really aren't. Since I've stopped reading in there, I find that I go just as much. I go when I *need* to go, not just because the clock is at a certain time, or because I felt a little heavy and thought that was my body's way of telling me to go. Unless you have some kind of real serious problem, your body will tell you to go in an unmistakeable way. You don't need to make it happen. It happens by itself. Why, I might even go so far as to say... shit happens.

      If you're under some kind of social pressure to go at a certain time, that's what needs to be fixed, not your bowels.

      On the flip side of this, many people in the western world have forgotten what real hunger is. This may be part of why we're obese: we eat for social purposes, or entertainment. If we ate when we were hungry, we might not be so fat. Hunger is a real, natural sensation that is not particularly painful or unpleasant. This, like a natural bowel movement, is part of your body's system. It seems we've gotten so wrapped up in some of these modern things that we've forgotten how to run the system like it should be run.

    10. Re:Really not good for your health by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      That's why reading the News while feeding the shitter is not a good idea. More light reading, like the novelization of ChainSawIII, is recommended for a calm, relaxing experience on the toilet.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    11. Re:Really not good for your health by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny

      To clarify, I mean "calmly wait outside the john". I usually do that only if the stall is occupied... Hmm, come to think of it, there are other circumstances where I might do it to, but for 90% of the population those wouldn't apply ;-)

      I go when I *need* to go, not just because the clock is at a certain time, So you mean, there really are people (in the US, I suppose?) that only go because it's "going time", not because they "need"? Weird stuff!
    12. Re:Really not good for your health by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

      what the hell? The reason you don't take a dump in the library is because its extremely anti-social! How would reading on the toilet even compare (excluding the example of the single toilet in a packed house/office/dorm/etc with a growing lineup)

    13. Re:Really not good for your health by Flwyd · · Score: 1

      I'm a hereditary bathroom reader. My parents' bathroom has a few dozen scientific magazines within reach of the toilet. While it often takes several minutes for us to undergo the movement, we're often on the john for ten or fifteen minutes after the important business has been done because Scientific American is just that fascinating.

      This is often a quite healthy pursuit as it allows us to take a break from stressful activities and reflect in quiet meditation. It's also healthy because of all the practical knowledge the practice produces. I learned about the FDA's new food pyramid in the bathroom. I also learned that fruit flies hear by spinning their noses.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  7. "Can't we act like adults... by maynard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr.... *Poopypants*!?!?!?!" -Lt. Frank Drebin

  8. Cute idea by countSudoku() · · Score: 5, Funny

    No that's thinking outside of the box! Personally, I like to do testing in the kitchen, then QA in the shower, then go production on the can... but that's just me.

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    1. Re:Cute idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shower before going on the can? Now that's just plain weird.

  9. It's all about productivity! by megaditto · · Score: 3, Funny

    Also, the hidden Web Cams in the female lavatory stalls are strictly for teleconferencing... during the downtime.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    1. Re:It's all about productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean uptime.

    2. Re:It's all about productivity! by JCota · · Score: 0

      Someone needed to get rid of the stiffness...

  10. Story quality by Danathar · · Score: 4, Funny

    this is the result of the "Fire Hose" feature that slashdot has.

    Stories selected by mobs.

    1. Re:Story quality by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      For those worrying, FireHose exists to help filter crap submissions from the good ones(*). Obviously, if the stories we saw on the front page were simply those voted to the top of the FireHose, then we'd be left with another Digg. This is the last thing everybody wants. As such, the editors and mods are only using FireHose to help find worthwhile stories.

      (*)I emailed the editors about this and they assured me that no, Slashdot was not headed in the direction of Digg.

  11. Old News by J.+Chrysostom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My 50 year old company has been putting out "The Porcelain Press" in the can for years. They do it mostly for health & safety stuff, but the idea's the same. It just took Google a few decades to catch up.

  12. On blogspot.com not google.com by loose+electron · · Score: 1

    the post is on a blog site, not on Google, April 1st a little early....

    --
    www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    1. Re:On blogspot.com not google.com by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Google owns Blogspot, and maintains MANY blogs on it.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    2. Re:On blogspot.com not google.com by Lao-Tzu · · Score: 1

      You can see this being announced on http://code.google.com/ as well, at this time.

    3. Re:On blogspot.com not google.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you it's true :)

  13. I, for one by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    ... would purchase a dedicated tablet device for reading google news while on the can.

    --
    C|N>K
  14. Another reason not to work for Google. by Vellmont · · Score: 1, Troll

    If this is a reflection of the Google Culture, then count me out. Are they all insane enough to think that every moment (including taking a shit) should be spent thinking about The Company? It seems to me they've developed a culture of True Believers that wouldn't even think there's something wrong with invading the bathroom with more work.

    I know someone is going to come back to me with "It's not work.. it's fun!". Just keep drinking that kool-aid buddy. Eventually you're going to figure out that there's more to life than work.

    Next up at google.. Google Dreams. A quiet voice plays back a list of abstract google-related words while you sleep, some of which will certainly influence your dreams.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Eventually you're going to figure out that there's more to life than work.
      Yeah, staring off blankly into space while you take a shit is really living life to the fullest. Get a grip man.
    2. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      The first time a manager hands me some test documentation to read in the can, will be the second time I hand a manager a poop wrapped in a test document.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by carpeweb · · Score: 1

      Amen! How many of us have had coworkers or bosses who would follow us into the lavatory and try to continue a discussion while "on break"?

      My response: there's a reason they call it a "break".

      If this trend isn't stopped, then "Mr. Poopypants" (above) will in the future refer to a new clothing line consisting -- literally! -- of a series of tubes (marketed under a hip label like TSteve, no doubt).

    4. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      I'll think whatever they want for however long they want so long as they give me enough money.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    5. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Next up at google.. Google Dreams"

      I was thinking Google Sex, streaming videos and search related items for the words yelled out during coitus mounted as a flat panel on the ceiling, with optional forehead/backside mirrors for wife/hubby/SO.

      *note to self, register ohgodyesyes.com ASAP!!!*

    6. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a grip. The handicap stalls are a wonderful thing for squeezing out a burly one.

    7. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The testing on the toilet stuff is taped to the wall above the urinals, and on the inside of the doors in the stalls.

      You don't have to read it. It's just there.

      Hop off the monstercock, Vellmont.

    8. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by aldo.gs · · Score: 0

      Although I think this is a bit extreme, I believe that there are times that you just feel like reading something (even when taking a dump) related to your work. I know I don't, but there are people that actually enjoy they work.

    9. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I work at Google

      Where did it ever say that "Testing on the Toilet" is required reading? It's an 8.5x11" printout that's taped to the wall, off to the side. Right next to it there's also some monthly humor and announcement thing, and outside the stalls (in some bathrooms) there's a semi-stocked magazine rack. I usually don't even notice the TotT printouts and instead read my own magazine or the occasional newspaper. Occasionally I'll read a TotT, and at least it's an alternative to staring at the same four tiles for 5 minutes.

      I think some of you guys are reacting to this too strongly. This isn't the brainchild idea of a dozen executives in suits trying to boost productivity -- the company doesn't really work that way. It's just an engineering group in Google who are thinking of other ways to disseminate information. Different groups and individuals will occasionally hold tech-talks on various topics for people to attend during their spare time. These aren't required either, and are sometimes a welcome escape. Almost nothing about working at Google is mandatory, save the obvious requirement of doing one's job.

    10. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Where did it ever say that "Testing on the Toilet" is required reading?

      And where did I say or imply it was required reading? My comments are about this reflecting the Google Culture. The blog also indicated this was something that was all over Google worldwide (over 500 stalls). That's part of the culture at Google, and that's what disturbs the people responding to this story.

      This isn't the brainchild idea of a dozen executives in suits trying to boost productivity

      Actually I'd be less disturbed if it were the brainchild of some execs. Since it's all internal, it's an indication to me that people actually think intruding on time on the toilet is something that's OK for people to promote.

      Almost nothing about working at Google is mandatory, save the obvious requirement of doing one's job.

      I know how culture works too. It may not be mandatory, but you won't get anywhere if you don't do what's expected. Sorry, but I (and apparently a lot of others) find the whole idea disturbing. I think it's because people consider the damn bathroom to be private, and not be invaded by work. The fact that some people at Google think they can invade other people's space with work is disturbing. It's indicative of something strange going on. Saying that it's not mandatory really kind of misses the point.

      --
      AccountKiller
    11. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Thexare+Blademoon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dare I ask about the first time?

    12. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intruding on time on the toilet? Invade "other" people's space? I got a tip for you: just don't read it. Problem solved.

    13. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Funny

      The testing on the toilet stuff is taped to the wall above the urinals, and on the inside of the doors in the stalls.

      You don't have to read it. It's just there. And this also has the advantage that if you don't agree, you just need to aim a little bit higher...
    14. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      This is crazy. I can't believe people are "disturbed" by this. Firstly, it's the most trivial thing ever. You don't have to read it. Secondly, contrary to popular opinion, Google is not the borg and employees can and do criticise the company. I've heard more than one person comment that they aren't a fan of TotT, but it's not because they find it "sinister" ... it's because some people just don't like how strongly some other people push unit testing. And in my experience that's true of many software companies :/

      Seriously, if you want to see a not-quite-right urinal then there's a pub in England that has eye-level screens in the gents loo, which play soft-porn movie clips. Advice on unit testing is pretty tame in comparison to that.

    15. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually I'd be less disturbed if it were the brainchild of some execs. Since it's all internal, it's an indication to me that people actually think intruding on time on the toilet is something that's OK for people to promote.

      So you'd rather a suit dictate practices at work rather than a group of fellow employees? Google also has a weekly Friday event where they serve beer and talk about current company events. I personally found that kind of annoying -- I generally have more interesting things to do on Friday afternoons. My solution (and many other's)? I just don't go

      I know how culture works too. It may not be mandatory, but you won't get anywhere if you don't do what's expected.

      Again, it's not expected that employees read the ToT posts. Additionally, reading ToT is not central to individual performance at Google. There are a million other things that are probably more useful in getting ahead in the workplace.

      Sorry, but I (and apparently a lot of others) find the whole idea disturbing. I think it's because people consider the damn bathroom to be private, and not be invaded by work. The fact that some people at Google think they can invade other people's space with work is disturbing. It's indicative of something strange going on. Saying that it's not mandatory really kind of misses the point.

      Google also provides free meals. This generally implies that employees will eat with each other at work. As much as the food and company are generally pretty good, I find it unhealthy and a slight invasion into my private life to always eat meals at work. What's the solution? Banning free meals at work altogether? Obviously not. I think most people just walk out the door and catch up with friends over lunch.

      The point I'm trying to make is that there are a lot of things going on internally within the company. Any practice at Google, including ToT, is always an experiment. These things are generally debated and discussed internally ad nauseum. If a practice isn't yielding positive results by some measure, it's usually either improved in some way or abandoned. Employees generally respect each other's judgement. The strange thing that you may be seeing is that the company doesn't have some rule in the handbook that says "Thou shalt not place posters in the bathroom". The way things work here is "try out your ideas and see what happens". I personally don't mind the ToT posters, but I know a few colleagues that think they're silly. The important thing, though, is that I trust that the group responsible for doing this aren't trying to make life miserable for others and are listening to what people think of their idea.

    16. Re:Another reason not to work for Google. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      heh. It's funny when written that way.
      Comedy is art. And I am a comic in much the same way that a guy frames a glass of urine is an artists.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. Where's Triumph the Insult Comic Dog by flanksteak · · Score: 1

    when you need him?

    This code is just good enough...for me to poop on!

    One other thing, can I assume that this is in the Mens toilets only? Most women won't touch anything that has been in a bathroom (like magazines and newspapers) so I'm guessing keyboards are out, too.

    1. Re:Where's Triumph the Insult Comic Dog by Benley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude. There's no keyboards in the bathrooms. It's 8.5"x11" posters on the walls where you can read them while you *ahem* use the facilities.

    2. Re:Where's Triumph the Insult Comic Dog by flanksteak · · Score: 1

      Oh, I missed that. Why not then just print the code on the TP?

    3. Re:Where's Triumph the Insult Comic Dog by Benley · · Score: 1

      Oh, I missed that. Why not then just print the code on the TP?


      *laf* Awesome. I don't think wiping your ass on the tutorial is the intended purpose, though :)

    4. Re:Where's Triumph the Insult Comic Dog by RipTides9x · · Score: 1

      RTWA - Read the WIPING! Article?

  16. blog by the_tsi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google Testing Blog, November 15:

    Today I was hanging a clock above my toilet, when I fell and hit my head. I ended up having a vision of a new way to make sure code works properly (there also was some idea for a new hardware component -- some sort of capacitor -- but I'm a software engineer and don't know how to deal with those things; hopefully it wasn't very important).

    1. Re:blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Testing Blog, November 14

      Today some guy named Marty was very positive about my completing testing of a time machine. Seriously, where do these kooks get their ideas? Well, off to the john

  17. now we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... why most of google offerings are still at alpha/beta stage after they make they are first released to the public :)

  18. Lincoln Logs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another creative use for "Lincoln Logs".
    I have a great picture of the "executive" restroom for several years ago but it is a pity I cannot post it. This picture is perfect for this.

  19. My core dump analysis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is usually limited to checking the TP to know when to stop wiping.

  20. More bran fibre in the diet. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Funny

    Serious, if you have time to read on the toilet, maybe you should consider adding some bran fiber to your diet.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  21. Bad idea by kindbud · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sitting on the toilet too long can lead to hemorrhoids. Reading software testing documentation on the toilet can't be any better for your bunghole.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
    1. Re:Bad idea by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Reading software testing documentation on the toilet can't be any better for your bunghole.

            I dunno about you, buddy. I have it all printed in Braille. Oooh!

    2. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you tell me! (not a joke, unfortunately) Oh well, at least there's still the shower (or will that give me something else bad too?)

  22. Well I always said that... by denzacar · · Score: 0

    If you put your mind to it, you can accomplish anything.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  23. Here I sit all broken hearted by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tried to test, and only farted.
    Then one day I took a chance,
    Passed the test and shit my pants!

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Here I sit all broken hearted by Ansoni-San · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you're American? Way to leave the British out! It doesn't work with our accents...
      Yeah sure, let even the Aussies in on it but not the British.

    2. Re:Here I sit all broken hearted by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that you say pants with the flat A, but the 'a' in chance sounds like the 'o' in "Boston." I'm from Michigan originally, and we tend to have the flattest vowels in the US so my ditty rhymes perfectly in my head.

      I found this amusing clip about gay lesbian and transgendered issues:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hp_A0HCoh0

      Listen to how she says 'happens' at 32 seconds in. I say it the same way.
      Also amusing is the sequence 'talking about' at 38 seconds which is very typical if Michiganders. We say it 'talkin abouut'

      So, as you can see my vowels are fucked up and that why it doesn't rhyme for you.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  24. logging-off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surely logging-out ...

  25. It's Useful Mass Communication by jcarkeys · · Score: 1

    In the dorm in my college (one of the few with old style community bathrooms), we put up a weekly newsletter called "Stall Notes" that has upcoming events, humorous awards for the past week, a top 10 list, and some other rotating features. It's a really good way to ensure that everyone gets the message since no one looks at bulletin boards or email memos. If Google can use something like this to be more productive, good for them.

  26. 'Doodling on their PDA', huh? by eabell · · Score: 4, Funny

    I RTFA, but it was one of the comments that amused me:

    "A similar thing was/is in use at a place I worked. People made an effort to stay in the toilet for a long time (doodling on their PDA) and later claimed they were reading the work notes... :)"

    Ahem. 'Doodling on their PDA'? So is that what you kids call it these days?

  27. Old ATT Humor by Subgenius · · Score: 1

    "Sheesh, who just dumped core? Light a match!"
        -Kernel Boot Rom

    --
    Toil is Stupid. Don't be Stupid.
  28. This is a shitty idea by popo · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I didn't know better I'd say Google was having an increasingly difficult time
    squeezing out well formed ideas. (And something about this one smells a little off.) It might
    be because they're just not flushing out the bad ideas, but it also might be an
    indication that Google needs to unclog their management and wipe themselves clean
    of this "Testing Grouplet". While it is true that great ideas have plopped out of Google, I think
    our apparently limitless enthusiasm for anything and everything that spews from Google may have had
    the effect of loosening up their releases to the point of being soft and formless.

    My two cents.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:This is a shitty idea by malkir · · Score: 1

      Haha, oh man. Brilliant!

  29. google makes you work when you are on the Toilet? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    what a way to teat workers

  30. Testing / Etiquette by kevin_conaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Speaking of bathroom etiquette, if its a single bathroom, please knock on the door before just jiggling the handle to test if its locked. One day I might forget to lock the door and then we'll both be in for a rude surprise

    Regarding automated tests...write them!

    Once you get a framework in place, it really does make you feel better about writing new code and modifying old. It also helps with your design by forcing you to write components that are loosely coupled (i.e., they can be tested easily because they have little to no external dependencies)

    If you feel overwhelmed and don't know where to start, start by writing tests for new code and worrying about old code until later.

    1. Re:Testing / Etiquette by RipTides9x · · Score: 1

      Speaking of bathroom etiquette, if its a single bathroom, please knock on the door before just jiggling the handle to test if its locked.

      Speaking of bathroom etiquette indeed.
      If you jiggle the handle and find it locked, jiggling it vigoursly for another 30 seconds isn't going to make me shit any faster, thanks.

  31. hey... by lazycam · · Score: 1

    ...whatever makes you that extra billion.

    --
    my mom posts on slashdot.
  32. The Google cult (or maybe not....) by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Despite the veneer of amiability about this project, I find it faintly disturbing. Why?

    I think it's the attempt to work the job and group mindset into every part of an employee's day and life. The insinuation (by default) that an employee will want (not just be expected to) to contribute to the company in this way; even in rare "private time" like this (*).

    I think what really bothered me (in this context) was the group-oriented friendliness. It took me a while to figure out why, then I realised that it was faintly reminiscent of a cult. Not the mass-suicide, Waco types (or at least, not at that stage), but the friendly pressure "we're your friends and we want to help you" newcomer stage- often with good intentions by those taking part (**)- where the group slowly enters every aspect of the newcomer's life.

    Okay, I'm reading too much into this now; just bear in mind that Google's uber-friendly, everything-you-want-here campuses and the like have the advantage of keeping their employees happy, productive and within the Google sphere of influence. Sinister or not?

    (*) Please *don't* start a discussion about how, as the employee is being paid during work hours, this is reasonable. Besides which, the employee- of their own volition- would probably be thinking about their work while they were on the toilet anyway. Plus, it's often more productive to give the mind a rest or let it wander every so often. Isn't it normal and healthy for employees to think about something else (e.g. outside interests) every so often?
    (**) Yes, I did notice that this project was started by volunteers. Draw your own conclusions.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're not reading too much into it. I had this disturbing image flashing though my mind of the entire google staff lining up to drink kool-aid.

    2. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay, I'm reading too much into this now; just bear in mind that Google's uber-friendly, everything-you-want-here campuses and the like have the advantage of keeping their employees happy, productive and within the Google sphere of influence. Sinister or not?

      Man, those guys just can't win. Be a jerk to your employees, and you're a jerk. Try to make your employees happy, and you're sinisterly keeping them under your influence. I guess the optimum, then, is to give employees free soda and plenty of vacation time, but have the guy at the front desk smack them in the face and call them a bitch when they first walk in the door in the morning.

    3. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      It took me a while to figure out why, then I realised that it was faintly reminiscent of a cult.

      You're not the only one who thought that. There's something about putting work in a bathroom and just expecting everyone to be onboard that smacks of weirdo groupthink. The fact that it was done independently is quite telling.

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by ukemike · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was nice of them to float this idea, but in truth it was more of a sinker. I think it's important for a company to air out internal workings from time to time. I know they've been very regular with good products lately. You have to expect that from time to time they'll have a stinker. Actually I thought the article was a gas!

      --
      -- QED
    5. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> I think it's the attempt to work the job and group mindset into every part of an employee's day and life.

      Sure, but that's a small price for Google's huge new bran flakes subsidy in the company cafeteria.

    6. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by Alt321 · · Score: 1

      "I think it's the attempt to work the job and group mindset into every part of an employee's day and life. The insinuation (by default) that an employee will want (not just be expected to) to contribute to the company in this way; even in rare "private time" like this (*)."
      Tend to agree. I use this very creative private time for thoughts on my own personal projects. It's a key battle line in the seperation of work and life. Google are tapping into the last bastion of slacker time at work.

      The Human Rights lawyers should be all over this.

      Lawyer: So, under oath, you say that Google made you work in the ... John?
      (gasps fromt the auditorium).
      Google Employee: Y...y...yes. I tried to stop them ... b...b...but, they just kept sending me the flyers (bursts in a flood of tears).
    7. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by srpatterson · · Score: 1

      If that was the only irritation for today, that'd still be better then where I'm "working".

      --
      -- The Heineken Uncertainty Principle: You can never be sure how many bears you had last night.
    8. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by WiseMuse · · Score: 1, Funny

      I guess the optimum, then, is to give employees free soda and plenty of vacation time, but have the guy at the front desk smack them in the face and call them a bitch when they first walk in the door in the morning.

      We do this at my company, and it really doesn't work. People start to feel conflicted inside. Then they need therapy.

    9. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Some people just want to come in at 9, leave at 5, be paid a decent amount relative to the work performed and get a decent amount of vacation time. Anything else forced upon the person (even if its free soda pop and junk food), for a person that doesn't want it (ie. someone who chooses to drink only spring water and eat organic food), it is oppressive. Not everyone enjoys being trapped in a golden cage.

    10. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But, although you've read the books and heard the lectures, maybe you need a little more inspiration, tips, and prodding. And you need it to be in a place where when you see it, you can't ignore it."

      This doesn't really have a veneer of friendliness, and the author is confusing his (or her) needs with my needs.

    11. Re:The Google cult (or maybe not....) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the optimum, then, is to give employees free soda and plenty of vacation time, but have the guy at the front desk smack them in the face and call them a bitch when they first walk in the door in the morning.
      Hey, that's just like my workplace (except for the free soda and plenty of vacation time part).
  33. A show of hands? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    It all made sense, and they had me right up until they said "print out..." Come on, /.'ers, fess up, there's gotta be a pretty good percentage of you laptop owners that do computer-related activites on the can, *without* printing out anything, if you know what I mean.

    I expected the story to involve tablets or kiosk-like computers in the stalls. I was half thinking of inventing a little discrete flip-up table/shelf for laptops for use by nerds in the loo. ThinkGeek, drop me a line, and we'll market this puppy.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  34. So what do they do when they find a bug? by Thexare+Blademoon · · Score: 1

    Shit out a patch for it?

  35. Toilet Paper. by Krytical · · Score: 0

    It'd be much more helpful if you could print blogs in toilet paper.

  36. Re:No, In The Women's Too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    No, you cannot assume. They are posted in the women's bathroom also, on the back of the door so it's right in front of you. No hands involved.

  37. True Story by Paulrothrock · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At my current (well, my last day is tomorrow) job, we had a testing suite. His name was Bob. He launched IE and clicked things and entered random data and tried to break our web apps. When I suggested that we automate our testing, someone asked "How would we automate testing?"

    That's kinda when I decided I should leave.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:True Story by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      someone asked "How would we automate testing?" hmmm, I dunno. Maybe replace Bob with a Baboon? Unless Bob was already a baboon!
  38. The road to hell is paved with good intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Decades from now, when we are suffering under the tyranny of Google, we will wistfully look back on this as the moment when they started to become evil. It always starts small, and with the best of intentions. I JUST WANNA TAKE A DUMP, OK??? LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!

    1. Re:The road to hell is paved with good intentions by excalibursp · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this: [URL=http://www.GoogleIsSkynet.com]www.GoogleIsSky net.com[/URL] and this video: [URL=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3Qqc13Ihk8]ht tp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3Qqc13Ihk8[/URL] Excuse me while I go start building a bomb shelter.

    2. Re:The road to hell is paved with good intentions by pushf+popf · · Score: 1

      No shit!

      What kind of company won't even let you take a crap without working? Maybe now call-centers will start haing their employees answer phone calls on the crapper.

      "You're allowed 1 3 minute bathroom break between 10:00AM and 10:03AM, but you are required to answer calls during this time.

    3. Re:The road to hell is paved with good intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      First, they came for the defecators, but I didn't complain because...

    4. Re:The road to hell is paved with good intentions by persicom · · Score: 1

      No, the road to hell is paved with the skulls of priests. My brother, the father, told me so.

  39. Re: No, In The Women's Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you cannot assume. They are posted in the women's bathroom also, on the back of the door so it's right in front of you. No hands involved.

    I can only assume it is the same in the men's.

  40. Yes, it is a cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I worked for almost a year as a contractor for Google. The definition that probably defines this company quite well is a cult. It was evident that no one would criticize any aspect of the company, would do anything that they were asked to. Also, it was like employees were too thankful for having the privilege of working there. When you add a big dose of arrogance (I guess that being told day after day you are the best of the best produces those results) to the mix, you get what Google is within.

    It was indeed a very weird environment. I have worked in other big companies, but never say anything like that. The day my contract ended was a good one.

    1. Re:Yes, it is a cult by nick.ian.k · · Score: 1

      It was indeed a very weird environment. I have worked in other big companies, but never say anything like that. The day my contract ended was a good one.

      Now I've honestly never been roped into a real live cult, but aren't they supposed to be notoriously difficult to leave? My guess would be that the environment wasn't your own personal ideal workplace and you're just exercising hyperbole while simultaneously saying what few can: "I worked for Google." Really, no character assault intended here, but it's not like you went in every day and praised the cadre for sharing the sun and sky and water with you.

    2. Re:Yes, it is a cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It may be true. I have never been in a religious cult, so I am only guessing. Wikipedia offers this definition for cult: "cohesive group of people devoted to beliefs or practices that the surrounding culture or society considers to be far outside the mainstream, sometimes reaching the point of a taboo." Part of it fits very well what Google is within, but not completely.

      While I was working there, two full-time, regular employees (not contractors like me) left because of "personal issues". It was well known that the reason was they didn't agree with the "culture" (I am talking about one of Google's international offices, with less than a few dozens of engineers). Actually, after they left, it was sort of taboo to mention or talk about them. Weird. So it may be true that cults are difficult to leave for most people, but not for all. Usually people that get trapped into a cult have a certain personality, independently of how smart they are.

    3. Re:Yes, it is a cult by nick.ian.k · · Score: 1

      While I was working there, two full-time, regular employees (not contractors like me) left because of "personal issues". It was well known that the reason was they didn't agree with the "culture" (I am talking about one of Google's international offices, with less than a few dozens of engineers).

      I don't consider that especially odd. When people don't like the values, image, and so on put forth at a company or organization, internally or externally, they tend to leave because it makes them unhappy and feel they can't be themselves in such an environment. It's not uncommon. The folks who stick around unhappy are either the ones who love to bitch about what a bunch of creeps they work for, or the ones who acquired their jobs through nepotism instead of on the basis of skills and qualifications and fearfully await the day they're found out.

      Actually, after they left, it was sort of taboo to mention or talk about them. Weird.

      Taboo how? It's one thing if the bosses corrected somebody off-the-record for talking about what John and Jeff had moved on to (very creepy indeed), but beyond that, it could have been anything from regular ol' professionalism (who wants to spend time talking on and on about why so-and-so left for a good deal of time after their departure?) to jealousy ("Curse that talented fellow getting the higher-ranking position at Company X!") to whatever. Could you be more specific as to what you mean?

    4. Re:Yes, it is a cult by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      aren't they supposed to be notoriously difficult to leave?

      I think they're notorious for being difficult to get people out of; most members don't want to leave (often because of brainwashing and other indoctrination techniques), and the cult strong opposes outsiders who try to remove members.

      Again, I don't know as I've never been there, but that's the popular perception, at least as I perceive it.

    5. Re:Yes, it is a cult by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      When you add a big dose of arrogance (I guess that being told day after day you are the best of the best produces those results) to the mix, you get what Google is within.
      It's an advertising company, not fucking Top Gun.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Yes, it is a cult by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1

      Actually, after they left, it was sort of taboo to mention or talk about them. Weird.

      Taboo how?
      If "unperson" is not part of your know vocabulary you need to go and read 1984 right now!

      (not that I think Google is that bad, but it was the first thing that stroke my mind when reading the above comments)

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
  41. Why do people poo at work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really!? You need to go about once a day. Do it at home and stink up your own house. I think some of these bastards save it up for the office just to keep their families from having to smell their stench. And then there are the construction guys who come work in the office occasionally. I *know* these people never shit at home. My brother works construction and he used to come to *my* house to take a crap. Dirty bastards.

    Shit at home. And don't wipe snot on the wall above the urinal you sick freak.

  42. Obligatory Admiral Akbar quote. by Cimon+Avaro · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a crap!

  43. Ironic by Windows+Breaker+G4 · · Score: 1

    I find it ironic that i am sitting on the john while reading this article (at school no less)

    --
    brickspeed.net for your old Volvo performance addiction
  44. Re:google makes you work when you are on the Toile by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Teat's and toilets? Have you been watching German sheize videos again???

  45. Just needs adapated from the existing model by turtledawn · · Score: 1

    There's already something similar in some of the more modern lady's rooms around; it's a spring-mounted shelf that you pull down and put your purse/whatever on, which then keeps you from opening the stall door without first removing your belongings. I thought it was really quite clever the first time I saw one; it also helps reduce the incidence of people reaching over the top of the door and snagging your purse from the coat hook while you sit there and watch helplessly.

    --
    Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
  46. Me. I prefer Topology on the Toilet. by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    Metric spaces are the perfect accompaniment to a nice healthy number two.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  47. Dammit they ARE really Geniuses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woah, just when I was thinking that all that hype about Google only hiring geniuses through multiple grueling interviews was a bunch of BS, I read this. This is a true sign of genius to be sure. It gets me thinking I should go down and apply to work with them, but then I remember what a living hell it is to work with very many smart computer people in a matrix management. Plus I think that something Bad is going to happen to Google --there is no precedent for an entity like that in the history of Western Civilization and virtually all such references to that kind of company in science fiction and philosophical literary works throughout time have been negative. At some point Google goes away and the function is broken up into multiple entities, this much is clear, but what is not known is how much higher the stock goes before then and what the mechanism for its dissolution will be. But testing in the throne, that's just genius. Hopefully, before Google's demise, it's utopian work practices will be embraced throughout the next generation of Corporate America as DIGITAL's once were from the 1950s-1980s. (Hell, many people do not even know who DIGITAL is/was at this point --the same will be ever so much more certain with Google.)

  48. Here's an idea... by angelwalkwithme · · Score: 1

    How about they let me pull my Wii out in the bathroom and play with THAT instead.

  49. Spies by Joebert · · Score: 1

    This will prompt competitors to devolop Turd Burglars.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  50. and i thought my job was bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just think of all the shit work those testers at google have to doo.

  51. This is something new? by uglyMood · · Score: 1

    In my experience all computer languages are learned on the toilet; I've only met one programmer who claimed otherwise, and he was maladjusted in other ways as well.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you probably are." -- Buckaroo Heisenberg
    1. Re:This is something new? by uber_geek9 · · Score: 1

      Exactly! However, many-a-time I've been made fun of for lugging a copy of O'Reilly's Perl book or one of those Teach Yourself C in 24 Hours books with me into the john.

  52. Google... by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

    Not content with taking over everything else, they now aim to become "number 1" in the "number 2" business.

    They really seem to be getting their "shit" together.

    It's all part of their plan to "bowl" over the competition.

    Thanks, I'll be here all week. Please tip your bartenders.

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
  53. I've seen them. Above urinals. Really. by Animats · · Score: 1

    I've seen those posters. Long, detailed small-type discussions of code coverage analysis mounted above urinals. Last week's poster: Google measures code coverage on a per-statement basis. Really.

    Visiting Google HQ bothers me a bit. I'm the guy who did Downside, tracking failing dot-coms, and I see too many similarities between Google today and some of the more exuberant dot-coms. Google's business is basically AdWords and a search engine; on the side, they also operate a bunch of unprofitable dot-coms. YouTube, Gmail, and the web apps aren't profitable. If anything happens to force AdWords prices down, like an advertising price war with Microsoft or trouble with the pay-per-click model, Google may have problems.

    Google has a lot of smart people, but somehow that's not translating into new, profitable product lines.

  54. Works For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I often get breakthroughs there but it's because it's a place where I can relax. If I felt as pressured to get work done there as at my desk, I'm sure the magic will stop working.

  55. Re:google makes you work when you are on the Toile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheisse. Dummkopf.

  56. It is world-wide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's just an engineering group in Google who are thinking of other ways to disseminate information.

    I also work at Google but in an international site (which I won't mention). The ToT thing is also here. When I received the first internal e-mail about it (in November I think to remember) I just coudn't believe it and immediately thought it was unacceptable. But hey, it's Google, and we know that no one criticizes anything here -- at least openly!

    1. Re:It is world-wide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm at a different google site, and someone produces an amusing posting in the toilet every week. It differs, but it's kinda wacky, one week it was horoscopes, next it was how to adopt a pet, how to avoid holiday stress, etc, etc. It's cute and amusing.

      As for TotT, I like it - it's a good reminder of the different techniques and technologies that are available.

      Does this represent Google's culture? Yes - remember, we're talking about a company filled with highly technical engineers who love doing what they do. A number of my coworkers do this in their off time, as a hobby even.

      The toilet is a great place to get info across - it's like the side of the milk carton or cereal box. Someone is practically guaranteed to be staring at it for a few minutes - enough time to convey just enough to get them interested, yet not so much as to be an entire novel.

      No surprise, us Google people like our computer science and technology.

    2. Re:It is world-wide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know which office you work at, but here, 90% of employees are sales. We engineering are a minority. No one here posts anything in the door of the toilet. In fact, the atmosphere here is pretty lame and filled with suits. The ToT idea was a shock to me. There are many stupid things going on in this company, and that's probably one of the most stupid in a long time.

      No surprise, us Google people like our computer science and technology.

      I don't feel that love that much. I have been lately looking for other jobs and when talking to other companies they don't seem very impressed that I am currently working at google. Many seem to think we spend all day messing around with balls and eating free food.

  57. Why all the negativity? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Half the posts above seem to be suggesting that this is some kind of nefarious plot by Google to brainwash their employees. I thought we only displayed that kind of paranoia here about Microsoft. I see no suggestion in the article that people are forced to read this material. It is just available for those who are interested, and mildly useful education for those who do.

    Personally, I cannot be bothered to carry reading material to the pot. However, when the natural cycle is slow enough, I rather like the idea of having some interesting reading material conveniently available.

    In the past, I can remember seeing special toilet paper that contained jokes, quotes or similar material. The main difference here is that the material is more useful and can be provided at lower cost.

  58. The married cult (or maybe not....) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "...but have the guy at the front desk smack them in the face and call them a bitch when they first walk in the door in the morning."

    Sign me up.

  59. Smart is just an ingredient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Google has a lot of smart people, but somehow that's not translating into new, profitable product lines.

    Being smart doesn't mean that your are going to be good at your job. Not at all. There are many other important characteristics like creativity, attention to detail, honestly, passion, etc. And of course, successfully going through a certain type of interviews doesn't mean you are smart either. Just that you are their type of person, which in the case of seems to be a puzzle solver.

  60. Re:I've seen them. Above urinals. Really. by synx · · Score: 1

    Do you think your description would also fit Yahoo? They seem to make most of their money via their advertisement system - their other services don't really make much profit - maybe yahoo mail could be profitable (don't know), but I don't know.

    Also, what about TV networks - they are basically just advertising agency with video production on the side.

    You forgot to mention the BIGGEST difference between Google today and those exuberant failing dot-coms - Google has a strong revenue stream, with good growth, and a technically superior product. *shrug* I guess it isn't enough.

    Have you thought what you are seeing isn't dot-com, but the technical culture of the valley?

    PS: Anyone who uses code coverage measures it on at least a per-statement basis, preferably finer-grained than that. That's not really a big surprise.

  61. It's Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only Google can release something in the toilet and make the front page for doing so.

  62. Can you think of a better place... by jpetts · · Score: 1

    ... to work it out?

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  63. Re:google makes you work when you are on the Toile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waht a wey too treet teh inglish langwaje too!!!

  64. Obligatory... by Andrzej+Sawicki · · Score: 1

    And there-by avoid the flames of hurtful slashdotters!
    You must be new here.
  65. Already got a name for it by Chesnut · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon the blog will be titled "The Wee..kly Toilet Testing Blog". (Sorry, couldn't resist) Next, management will find some way to work "Privy Testing" into the project methodology.

  66. Some time to relax by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    Come on. Engineers need some time to relax from the very stressful work they do. What better time to relax for a minute than when in the toilet? :)

    (how long until your manager asks you why you didn't solve that bug when you come out of the WC?)

  67. Brings a whole new meaning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to the term 'Googlebombing'.

  68. when i was in management... by XO · · Score: 1

    ...and we were required to post "Premises may be under audio/video surveillance(sp)" posters somewhere where employees would see it, I always posted it eye level from sitting position on the crapper.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  69. poetry by envelope · · Score: 1

    Here I sit
    broken-hearted -
    came to shit
    but only farted.

    But Google Test
    saved us all
    by testing best
    in the stall.

    --

    appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars
  70. Emergency Supplies by maroberts · · Score: 1

    At least when the toilet paper dispenser runs out, they can always use the "emergency supplies"

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  71. Be afraid! by chrism238 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm wary of any article using both 'toilet' and 'launch' in the same sentence.

  72. Google is Skynet... beware by excalibursp · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of this blog: http://www.googleisskynet.com/ and this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3Qqc13Ihk8 Excuse me while I go start building a bomb shelter.

  73. Re:google makes you work when you are on the Toile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scheisse. Klugscheisser.

  74. "phobia"? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    >Also, your phobia of the words 'toilet' and 'shit' is humourous.

    It's not a "phobia", it's just (a degree of) class.

    Life is not made any more enjoyable by everyone using
    the earthiest words that they can think of all the time
    and in all circumstances.

    And it's hardly cool or rebellious anymore - if you want
    to be a rebel these days, clean up your speech :)

    1. Re:"phobia"? by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      >Also, your phobia of the words 'toilet' and 'shit' is humourous.

      It's not a "phobia", it's just (a degree of) class. Or a degree of feeling that you are above, perhaps somehow cleaner than, people who understand, accept, and openly talk about bodily functions...

      Life is not made any more enjoyable by everyone using
      the earthiest words that they can think of all the time
      and in all circumstances. Earthiest?! I dare say even the most heavenly and religious attempts by humans are still earthly and entirely human. You may think you are somehow being less "dirty" or "earthy" by calling it a lieu, toilette, rest room, water closet, comfort room, or John, but you're still describing exactly the same thing, and everybody still knows exactly what you're talking about. Over time, the cleansing effect of these foreign words is lost, and society moves on to a new, unfamiliar euphemism. The only group of people above this petty, earthy self-disgust is the group that refuses to use such obfuscating terms.

      And it's hardly cool or rebellious anymore - if you want
      to be a rebel these days, clean up your speech :) And it's hardly cool or rebellious to follow the group think that you need to use the term "tinkle" instead of "urinate", or "go #2" instead of "shit". Hell, it's downright childish.

      Personally, I see the point of rebellion as doing away with the idiotic mass practices of a culture or society which serve no purpose. As such, a rebellion could grow to encompass 90% of the population and still be a rebellion. This rebellion is about doing away with the idiotic pussy-footing of words and replacing it with a more precise, technical, and direct use of words. The fact that we're kicking your ass in a culture war does not mean entitle you to rebel status!
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    2. Re:"phobia"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's hardly cool or rebellious to follow the group think that you need to use the term "tinkle" instead of "urinate", or "go #2" instead of "shit".
      Uh, maybe I'm not up-to-date on my American vocabulary, but to me, "urinate" is as clean a word as can be found(meaning it would, for instance, be used in a formal medical setting), while "shit" is definitely not - aren't you looking for the word "defecate"?

      Also, in my opinion it would seem that the discussion above is not the result of either an excessive phobia of "bad" words on one part nor of crudeness on the other, but simply a confusion(or rather, a disagreement), on how formal a setting a Slashdot discussion is. This is really to be expected, in some threads here people tend to converse as if they're debating an issue, while in others people are just chatting as one would between friends at a pub.
    3. Re:"phobia"? by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Uh, maybe I'm not up-to-date on my American vocabulary, but to me, "urinate" is as clean a word as can be found(meaning it would, for instance, be used in a formal medical setting), while "shit" is definitely not - aren't you looking for the word "defecate"? I actually thought about that when posting and decided to use both terms. As the originally comment used the term "earthy" to describe certain words, I feel it is important to note that such people would not be caught dead using terms that actually directly describe such human acts. At least to the people I've met, they would not be caught dead saying "feces" or "defecate", and intentionally use terms such as "Go #2" or "see a man about a horse" to avoid saying the actual terms. While I could go on for hours about the history of the attempted use of new, cleansing terms for excretory acts, I don't think that's what you were asking about. Suffice to say that people afraid of using "earthy" words for bodily functions are constantly trying to find new ways of expressing necessary thoughts without actually saying the words because they feel it somehow raises the level of the conversation, as the original poster stated.

      Also, in my opinion it would seem that the discussion above is not the result of either an excessive phobia of "bad" words on one part nor of crudeness on the other, but simply a confusion(or rather, a disagreement), on how formal a setting a Slashdot discussion is. This is really to be expected, in some threads here people tend to converse as if they're debating an issue, while in others people are just chatting as one would between friends at a pub. I'm not sure I agree, but point well taken. I interpreted the remarks about earthy words as an implication that euphemisms and periphrases are somehow on an elevated, holy, or non-earthy level. It should be quite obvious that I disagree with that line of thinking.

      Of course I don't feel there's a need to change vocabulary simply because you're in a formal debate or sharing thoughts in a pub so long as people are using the most technically accurate and commonly understood words as possible.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  75. Old joke by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    What does a scientist do if he has constipaiton?

    He works it out with a sliderule.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  76. Maybe I just didn't notice it but... by mike+at+smu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow, I'm dissapointed nobody has come out with the obligatory "I thought this would have been developed at Microsoft being that most of their work is shit anyway" and some lame attempt at wit by talking about submitting their TP(S) reports.

  77. This is your boss... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    I need to see those logs on my desk in 5 MINUTES!!!

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  78. The good and the bad by ax_1225 · · Score: 1

    The good: You have some extra paper in case you run out.

    The bad: Google employees won't be able to shit anymore unless they are reading something. Can someone try to verify this one by checking the home toilet of a Google friend?

  79. They're above the urinals by Wee · · Score: 1
    They put these little pages (which are easily readable in like 60 seconds) above the urinals. It gives you something to glance at while taking a leak, much like those advertisement posters or newpaper holders you see above urinals in bars and restaurants.

    I'm not sure why everyone is getting so worked up about it. I think it's a clever idea, and I look forward to new issues. Besides, I almost always learn something!

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  80. A bit disturbing... by Arthur+Dent+'99 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but it disturbs me to see the words toilet and running internally in the same sentence!

    I can hear the jokes now:

    Where's Bob? Oh, he Ada too many Korn shells and now he's very Pro-Log. He's behind in his work, though, because the testing platform is backed up.

    In Soviet Russia, the toilet tests YOU!

  81. New meaning to "Core dumps" by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

    Brings new meaning to "Core dumps"

  82. Umm... by mikeron · · Score: 1

    So are Google's people a bunch of tight-asses, or do they just need some bran?