Slashdot Mirror


MythTV Vs. TiVo, Round 2

Egadfly writes with a comparison of the open source MythTV and the highly commercial TiVo Series 3. "How different are the two systems' available remote control devices and their graphic interfaces when it comes to ease of use? Which product should you choose if your HD signal comes OTA or if you plan to use CableCARDs? And what software features (present and future) can you expect with each product? Will loopholes in FCC regulations and cable company encryption ultimately squeeze out MythTV and other open source players?"

337 comments

  1. Balkenization. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is Tivoization part of the consideration?

    1. Re:Balkenization. by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      ***Is Tivoization [wikipedia.org] part of the consideration?***

      Probably, but so is the fact that GPLed TIVO source code is (presumably) accessible even if you can't induce TIVO's hardware to run a modified version. One important use of source code that is rarely discussed is that examining the code is sometimes the only way to figure out why something that should work doesn't. Typically, it will turn out that you just have to do things a little different -- in some fashion that no sentient creature is likely to guess -- in order to do what you want to do.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    2. Re:Balkenization. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only their changes to the kernel that are GPLed source.

      http://www.tivo.com/linux/linux.asp

  2. Re:TiVo wins of course... by the_tsi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hold on, guys, we can watch this show right after I reboot. Aw, crap, the nfs mount from the file server hung. Be right back, this will only take a minute. Wait, no, it's working now. Okay, there. I dunno why it's skipping, that should fix itself in a minute. Yeah, I know, it's still going on. Maybe another reboot would fix it. Aw shucks, it oopsed. Maybe this weekend I'll stop overclocking this AMD K6 I found in a dumpster over the holidays. I know, I know, but it didn't cost me a dime! Where are you guys going? Don't leave, this will only be a few more seconds. Trust me, this show is so awesome it's totally worth it. I'll just copy it over to the entertainment center box instead of the file server. Hm. I thought my network was faster than that, this should totally be taking less time. Fuck. Out of disk. Just lemme delete a couple things... there, now I'll redo the transfer. Oh, hey, you're back. What's in the bag from Fry's? No, what the hell, dude! I don't want a TiVo in my place, that thing is a tool of corporate oppression! Trust me, the myth box works 100% of the time, this is the only hiccup it's ever have, and it'll be fixed in a second. I don't care if that thing can download from Amazon! I can torrent any show ever. Okay, well, not that one. Or that one. But everything else is on torrent. Or usenet. There, see, it's booted now! Okay, it's playing. Hey, where'd everybody go?

  3. Re:TiVo wins of course... by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The moral of the story is that your friends only wanted you for your PVR capabilities?

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  4. Myth Wins of course by mattaw · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sitting at my desk I realise that I have a whole weekend fiddling with my Mythbox:

    Installing larger HDDs and playing with Volume manager so I can 'easily expand my storage space'
    Installing a second tuner card so we can record two shows at a time
    Making WOL work properly so I can start the backend from sleep with my laptop
    Get The MythWeb plugin running so I can schedule shows from work
    Install the SNES emulator so I can play supermario
    Fix a quiter CPU fan to improve the noise footprint

    If I owned a TiVO it would have installed with no trouble!
    With myth I have weeks of fun ahead

    1. Re:Myth Wins of course by jimstapleton · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I gave up on trying to figure out mythtv...

      on my desktop I have a watch-tv.sh file:
      START
          #!/bin/sh
          cat /dev/cxm0 > vlc stream:///dev/stdin
          bash &
      STOP

      I use the pvr250-control console app that was with the driver application to change the channel/input source.

      To record? I cron a record.sh I made: record.sh channel file duration-in-minutes
      START
          #!/bin/sh
          pvr250-control -t -m 0 $1
          cat /dev/cxm0 > $2 &
          sleep 1
          PID=$(ps | grep cat | grep cxm0 | cut -f 2 -d ' ')
          sleep $(echo "$3 * 60" | bc)
          kill $PID
      STOP

      Fancy? No
      Elegant? Hell No
      Works? Yes
      Low Hassle? Yes

      but yeah, a TiVo would probably be even easier than that.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:Myth Wins of course by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that you aren't married...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Myth Wins of course by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except all of your "mythtv problems" are tweaks. Some of those "tweaks" represent things that can't be done with Tivo or would be even more difficult. If you have no interest in hacking a proprietary Linux machine (the tivo) then you probably would have no interest in MythTV. If on the other hand you find yourself wanting to hack with a proprietary Linux machine you might as well take the next logical step and build an open system.

            It all boils down to whether or not you are a "PC user" or a "Mac user" when it comes to your PVR needs.

            The former is more powerful and more flexible and more open and the latter is easy and well integrated for what few features it supports.

            I never need to worry that "Tivo to Go" features will be disabled to satisfy some media mogul.
            I can actually use my USB port for something interesting.
            I can upgrade the box rather than throwing it out and buying a new one.
            I don't have to pay the weaknees price for storage or get myself into a position that's equivalent
                    (or worse) than "hacking a Tivo".
            I don't have to pay n+1 times for program guide data based on how many frontends I want.
            Any PC can be a frontend and I don't have to disable the one and only PVR in the house just
                    because I want to clean stuff out or re-prioiritize a wishlist.
            It does things that Tivos don't. This includes games & being a DVD jukebox.

            The buttons on my remote don't change just because of a power hit. I don't have to fiddle around
                    with some easter egg when those buttons do get reset.

            Tivo Corp has made too little progress & needs someone like MS or Apple to slap them around a bit.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Myth Wins of course by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      no, but I know two gals who would find that solution overly "fluffy" and would enjoy something a bit more crude.

      So... You are right, although your logical deduction getting to that point was not.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    5. Re:Myth Wins of course by zmotula · · Score: 1

      sleep $(echo "$3 * 60" | bc)
      sleep $(($3*60))? I am not nitpicking, it's just that you might want to know. (Or does your version do something extra?)
    6. Re:Myth Wins of course by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      didn't know.

      Thanks.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    7. Re:Myth Wins of course by WhiteDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      sleep $(echo "$3 * 60" | bc) sleep $(($3*60))? I am not nitpicking, it's just that you might want to know. (Or does your version do something extra?)sleep ${3}m --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    8. Re:Myth Wins of course by SevenHands · · Score: 1

      Now that is a good post, made me chuckle. Seriously, I found that the time I spent setting up my mythbox to be alot more interesting than if the time was spent watching TV. Now that the MythTV box is setup and running smooth with all of my tweaks, it just sits there and records shows, which I find I don't watch anyways. It was the adventure of setting up the box, both hardware and software wise, and making it as quiet as possible (which the wife and myself greatly appreciate) that was the fun part. Watch TV? Meh. I'd rather fiddle.

    9. Re:Myth Wins of course by zmotula · · Score: 1

      This does not work everywhere, for example on vanilla OS X.

    10. Re:Myth Wins of course by Lee148 · · Score: 1

      ... and using Slackware.

    11. Re:Myth Wins of course by TheSlashaway · · Score: 1

      I did the aame thing (out of frustration w/mythtv) but with a client/server setup and mplayer. watch-tv nc -n -l -p PORTNUM_GOES_HERE | mplayer -ni -fs - stream-tv cat /dev/video | nc -n CLIENT_IP_ADDR PORTNUM_GOES_HERE

    12. Re:Myth Wins of course by toadlife · · Score: 1

      I'm married, and I managed to get my pvr350 working in FreeBSD using the pvrxxx driver port. I wrote a shell script that turns the TV on and off and changes the channels.

      But I also have a Windows Media Center PC. Maybe that balances things out?

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    13. Re:Myth Wins of course by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      I thought that used the pvr250 port, the pvrxxx port was for the 150 and 500 series (I have a 150 on FBSD)

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    14. Re:Myth Wins of course by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      No, I have been burned too much by Linux to consider using it seriously, ocassionally I'm convinced to give it another chance, and I am invariably burned it seems.

      Nope, I use FreeBSD.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    15. Re:Myth Wins of course by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      It all boils down to whether or not you are a "PC user" or a "Mac user" when it comes to your PVR needs. The former is more powerful and more flexible and more open and the latter is easy and well integrated for what few features it supports.

      I think your analogy is a bit off. Being a Tivo user is more akin to being a Windows user. Tivo is mainstream and relatively easy to use for a subset of tasks and it is intentionally crippled by big business to make it hard for you to do things they don't like (burn DVDs and VCDs, skip commercials, use a free or even different programming schedule, save as an mpeg, or interoperate with other devices). Using MythTV is a lot like being a Linux user. If you know what you're doing you can put together something powerful and flexible, but it takes knowledge and you may end up with instability for a while with non-core features.

      I think of myself as a "Mac User" kind of PVR guy and in fact my PVR is an old Mac with an EyeTV device attached. It was plug and play and burning a DVD is simple and easy and the commercial skip works as expected, but I needed to have a whole Mac computer (expense) to get it to work. I have no interest in spending time hacking a box, but I do have an interest in features those fat cats at the cable company don't want me to know about.

      Tivo Corp has made too little progress & needs someone like MS or Apple to slap them around a bit.

      Tivo has sold out... plain and simple. They started as a device to let regular people easily do things with their TV programming that the cable company was dead set against (like skip commercials). At some point they realized the cable companies had to much power to fight and the cable companies offered them huge sales contracts for branded set-top PVRs with as many of the features that did not benefit the cable company stripped out as possible. Tivo went for it (I can't blame them) but they aren't working just for the end user anymore and it shows. It is time for people to move on and realize the brand has changed and in a head to head comparison with other offerings, Tivo is seriously crippled.

    16. Re:Myth Wins of course by toadlife · · Score: 1

      My mistake. I had a pvr150 in there. I've since moved my PVR150 to my Windows Media Center PC, and I'm going to put the PVR500 in the machine that runs FreeBSD.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    17. Re:Myth Wins of course by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Oh my, I said "pvr350" in my original post didn't I. I have a 150 and 500MCE.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    18. Re:Myth Wins of course by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Using MythTV is a lot like being a Linux user.

      Umm. . . MythTV is not LIKE being a Linux user. You ARE a Linux (or BSD) user. :)

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    19. Re:Myth Wins of course by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if there are issues making MythTV work with SDTV Digital cable streams (Comcast)? I'm wanting to build a Myth box, but all the channels I want to record are digital only. . . Looking at what I can find online seems to indicate otherwise, but that doesn't make any sense either.

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    20. Re:Myth Wins of course by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

      cat /dev/cxm0 > $2 &
      sleep 1
      PID=$(ps | grep cat | grep cxm0 | cut -f 2 -d ' ')

      There's a slightly simpler way! Here:

      cat /dev/cxm0 > $2 &
      PID=$!

      More efficient (not running ps, grep, or cut), more reliable (no race condition), more portable (not relying on the output format of ps), and definitely more readable.

    21. Re:Myth Wins of course by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      This does not work everywhere, for example on vanilla OS X. True, the unit suffix option is, as far as I know, only available on GNU tools. This is the default on just about every linux system, but other unix flavors would likely use the BSD tools, or other ones. For a more portable solution, I suggest using "at" so instead of "sleep ${3}m" which relies on a GNU extension, use the POSIX "at now + $3 minutes" which should work on just about any system. Note that the syntax of at is different from sleep, so you will have to either provide stdin containing the commands to be executed, or a file as specified by the "-f" option.
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  5. Re:TiVo wins of course... by LordSnooty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nice try! The live TV side of Myth might be flaky - probably due to hardware constraints as much as the program - but for playing downloaded video It Works, I've never had a problem like that which you mention. And I use an nfs diskless solution too, never has it not booted. And thanks to power cuts it has gracelessly shut down several times, but so far so good.

    Broadcast TV is dead, by the way.

  6. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TIVO owner: Hold on guys, while I play this show I recorded on my tivo.

    TIVO: Sorry, I've deleted that show because a local company 'accidentally' set the macrovision copy protection flag on the broadcast.

    There are some pragmatic benefits to using free software to store/watch/stream/listen to/etc your media.

    (and its not as hard as you make out)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanboy by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    I think the best uptime I've had on my MythTV PVR is around 200 days. I blame the power company for that one.

    1. Re:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanboy by gharris · · Score: 1

      Ouch, You should look into the auto-shutdown/startup feature :-)

      --Glenn

    2. Re:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanboy by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I almost reached 200 on my backend recently, but I had to reboot to install Xen and a Xen-compatible kernel.

      Gotta add that Trixbox PBX lovin'. :)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  8. Re:TiVo wins of course... by tijmentiming · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Move along, nothing to see here...

    From the article, about the User Interface:

    This is a hard category to judge, but I'll give the interface and ease of use award to TiVo's Series 3. Really, the category is almost too tight to call. While MythTV has some better UI choices and abilities, TiVo's standard interface is more simple to setup (turn on the box) and more people are use to it.
    I want screenshots! Not some excuse why it's hard to judge. "This is my seven page article. however, it's a hard subject. therefore I'm going to write how hard it is to write about this subject"
  9. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Heem · · Score: 1

    maybe you suck at computers.. mine works fine.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
  10. Completely Off Topic by WaZiX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But maybe there should be a rule about not allowing links to Articles full of Advertisement that span over 7 pages with about 100 words/page...

    1. Re:Completely Off Topic by SenFo · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:Completely Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. This suggestion gets my vote!

    3. Re:Completely Off Topic by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought he was kidding about how short the pages were until I looked. The intro page is short, and the summary is even shorter, yet they get a page each with no pictures. In fact only pages 2,3 and 5 have a reasonable amount on them, with the other 4 pages being only around two short paragraphs long each.

      Add to that the fact that the summary doesn't really rule one way or the other...

      Also your link doesn't work.

    4. Re:Completely Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also your link doesn't work.

      True. You have to click on "Printer Friendly" once you get there. Then it works.

      Replying to original parent: People who don't know how to use CSS properly should do all their layout in tables to avoid this sort of thing.

    5. Re:Completely Off Topic by hack++slash · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something here? after clicking the pages a few times I couldn't see any adverts on any the pages at all, they all disappeared! this is without any adblocker type programs running.

      The amount of content per page isn't that high but it has to be said I've seen much much worse when it comes to advert/content ratio.

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    6. Re:Completely Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint to GP:
      Link containing "sessionid", "sid" or more generally hexadecimal numbers won't work for others...

    7. Re:Completely Off Topic by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      But maybe there should be a rule about not allowing links to Articles full of Advertisement that span over 7 pages with about 100 words/page...

      Here is where to complain.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    8. Re:Completely Off Topic by FutureDomain · · Score: 1

      This is where Adblock Plus Firefox extension comes in. I have installed it on all of my computers with all the additional filter sets and I haven't seen a banner ad for a few years. I especially love seeing the empty box labeled "Advertisement"!

      --
      Hydraulic pizza oven!! Guided missile! Herring sandwich! Styrofoam! Jayne Mansfield! Aluminum siding! Borax!
    9. Re:Completely Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you complain if you're not logged in?

    10. Re:Completely Off Topic by calciphus · · Score: 1

      You still see ads on the internet?

    11. Re:Completely Off Topic by maven_johnson · · Score: 1

      use lynx in a terminal to view it. all of a sudden, the article appears to be the prominent feature, instead of the distracting ads and images. enlightening low tech.

    12. Re:Completely Off Topic by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should also have compared those two boxes to what people who like HD actually use to record it with, a Dishnetwork VIP-622 DVR? Apparently it escaped their attention that people who have to have HD (you know, the guys with 100"+ HD screens who now hate anything in SD) tend to go with the provider that has by far the most HD and has had an HD DVR the longest.

      Being the third generation of HD DVR for Dishnetwork (previously having provided the 921 and 943) and having been out for over a year, you'd think they'd have heard of it? Maybe once they've worked the bugs out of the Tivo series 3 and the DirecTV and cable boxes you would want to compare them, but right now the 622 is the easy winner.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  11. Printer friendly version by Little_Professor · · Score: 1

    Notice how they cloak the printer friendly version using some javascript wizardry. So you (next page) have to(next page) wade through (next page) pages of (next page) content free (next page) glorified ad billboards.

    1. Re:Printer friendly version by phusg · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    2. Re:Printer friendly version by What'sInAName · · Score: 1

      There were ads? It's funny, but I guess my brain has learned to completely tune them out. Reall, I'm not being snarky. When I look at a page like this I see, 1) Article text -and- 2) Random junk that doesn't attract my attention.

      I *really* hate ads though, so maybe that's why I learned to do this. On the down-side, if there is something that's off the main article text that I *should* notice (such as suplimental material for the article) I just miss it.

    3. Re:Printer friendly version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The print version worked fine for me.

  12. Re:TiVo wins of course... by coffee412 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, Theres a mythtv for windows?

    Ive used mythtv on my linux box sitting next to the big screen for years now. Never much of a problem at all. Love mythtv and will never give it up.

    "I WANT MY MYTH TV!!"

  13. CableCARD is all that matters by RoboRay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Until I can get CableCARD support in a home-built Linux box (and I know I never will) Myth is completely irrelevant. A set-top DVR is the only choice for a more-than-minimally-functional system.

    1. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by croddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For you, perhaps. I haven't a clue what CableCARD even means, and somehow I've managed to keep my Myth box's 160GB hard disk full continuously for as long as it's been in service.

    2. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      CableCARD is basically a system that allows any equipment, not just provider-supplied decoders, to recieve and decrypt encrypted digital TV (typically from digital cable). It's similar to the CAMs that have been part of the DVB standard since the beginning, with the exception that CAMs were intended to be an open specification, and are supported well by Linux.

      CableCARD is intentionally proprietary, and will likely never be supported by Linux without someone being sued for DMCA violation, despite still needing a valid subscription to receive encrypted content.

      Europeans have no such problem, of course. One can easily build a MythTV system using a dual-tuner DVB card, then plug the CAM into the card, insert the provider's smartcard into the CAM, and away you go. Such devices are actually far better supported under Linux than Windows.

    3. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jotok · · Score: 4, Informative

      My Myth setup simply uses an IR blaster to interact with the set-top box. It does precisely everything the latest HD TiVo does.

      Just a suggestion, maybe you should know what you're talking about before you dismiss Myth as "irrelevant."

    4. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Informative

      A set-top DVR is the only choice for a more-than-minimally-functional system.
      How do you define a minimally-functional system? Every single thing I've wanted to watch over the past 3 or 4 years has been available via the analog cable tuner so my Hauppauge PVR 250 cards capture it just fine. If I really wanted to watch pay channels (though I don't subscribe to any) then I could just plug my cable box into the SVIDEO input on my card and use an IR blaster to change the channels as necessary like a TiVo does. In the end, I've found all I really watch is primarily network television that I could pick up with a pair of rabbit ears if I wanted to. I'll occasionally watch USA or TNT or something, but for the most part, everything I ever watch is available over my analog cable service.
    5. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Thanster · · Score: 1

      I've got a DVB-C card working with myth-tv it does the trick for _unencrypted_ content very nicely (on uk cable networks that appears to be BBC1 BBC2 ITV and C4 (but not 5) there is is a seedy underground of "softcam" support for decrypting the other stuff.... but I havent looked at that. (mythTV wont let the project go anywhere near that stuff)

    6. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      The usage of IR blasters it not optimal. I know because I'm using it on my Series 2 TiVo with my cablebox. In general it is pretty good at changing the channels, there times when it does not change the channel correctly. Honestly, the IR blaster are making me give serious consideration to buy a Series 3 TiVo so I can use a cablecard. I think given an option, most people who use IR blasters would use an alternative method if available.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    7. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jotok · · Score: 1

      Yah, a CableCard would be better (especially since at least Cox Cable and probably some other providers are bundling the HD STB with DVR functionality). But to say that a homebrew DVR is not functional because there is no CableCard support in Linux is just plain wrong.

    8. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a similar setup (in that I have a cable box to unscramble the channels I pay for) and MythTV works perfectly with it. How? I bought something called MyBlaster that allows MythTV to control what channel the cable box is tuned to. No CableCARD is necessary.

    9. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jeaton · · Score: 1
      Interesting, can your Myth setup record HD channels, including those which aren't in the clear, from cable without recompressing the bitstream? No? Then you aren't doing what the TiVo series 3 does.

      Just a suggestion, maybe you should know what you're talking about


      Irony.
    10. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Really? including recording all the HDTV channels?

      where are you because Comcast scrambles all HD content and disables the firewire connector on the back of the set top boxes around here.

      Granted, if the Tivo Series 3 does not have cablecard, then it's useless as well.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      In the U.S., at least, Cablecard is the only way for someone with cable to receive the digital channels (i.e. channels 60-1000) without using the cable company's own cable box. It's a card that fits into a slot on your DVR that allows it to decrypt the digital channels.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to me.

      I dont have cablecard and I enjoy all the shows in full HD.
      I use the bittorrent card.

      Full HD, no commercials, I get to watch them the next day anyways. Heck because the same guys release the TV shows I can easily write a script with wget and other apps to look for the torrents and download them automatically. It's just like a tivo except it extracts the commercials and compresses them to mpeg4 so it's even easy for me to take them on my laptop.

      and yes, I dont give a rats about "legality" these same asshats that run these networks are forcing me to find the shows on bittorrent because they demand the cable companies scramble it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Can it record two channels at the same time? Can it record an HD signal at full resolution without recompressing it?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jotok · · Score: 1

      Can anyone watching appreciate the difference?

      No?

      Clown.

    15. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by pyite · · Score: 2, Informative

      Comcast scrambles all HD content and disables the firewire connector on the back of the set top boxes around here.

      While it's expected that some content is encrypted, by law, they must enable the Firewire connector. So, you can get it enabled. It will only help for unencrypted content, but it's still useful.

      "...To accommodate these interfaces, effective April 1, 2004, upon consumer request, MSOs must provide functional 1394 outputs to HD STBs, either by downloading the necessary software to STBs with existing 1394 ports, or by replacing a deployed HD STB for one which includes 1394. These leased HD STBs must be controllable by a TV or other device equipped with a 1394 port for the tune function, mute function, restore volume function, power on, power off, and status inquiry. (Under the MOU, the STB will be provided at no additional cost to the customer, but MSOs may charge, as appropriate, for delivery and installation of the new STB.)..."

      I'm not sure of the original source of that, but there ya go.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    16. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jotok · · Score: 1

      I'm in Virginia Beach. Cox also scrambles the HD content, so I take it from their HD set-top box.

      They are replacing my STB with one that includes DVR functionality, so it's about to become moot--I could still use the myth box in the same fashion, but it would be redundant...though on the other hand, a TiVo or cable box won't let you space-shift your shows. So maybe there is still some value.

    17. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      where did you get that quote from? I really need that document to force the cable companies hand.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by airjrdn · · Score: 0

      I thought I read where they had to enable the firewire port (by law) if requested.

    19. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by tji · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Noone can tell the difference between true HD and downconverted SD? That's what he's talking about. The Tivo can record encrypted HD channels, because it has CableCard cards.

      The Tivo cannot use those channels, so it would either need to record the SD version of the channel (ESPN vs. ESPN-HD), or control the cable box & record the S-Video (standard definition) output of ESPN-HD. There are no HD encoder cards available in the home-user price range.

      The difference between a High Definition channel and the Standard Definition version is HUGE.

      Despite this, I still use MythTV, because most of the programs that I watch are either broadcast over the air in (unscrambled)HD or are only available in SD. The big exception is ESPN-HD, but I can live without that.

    20. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by tji · · Score: 1

      Oops, submitted that too quickly. Obviously the second paragraph should be "MythTV cannot use those channels" because it doesn't support CableCard.

    21. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A set-top DVR is the only choice for a more-than-minimally-functional system.

      Never used Myth, huh?

      Myth is constantly talked about as far as PVRs ar the like are concerned. What is often ignored is, frankly, the best part of the project; The videos section. I can "backup" a DVD on to disk, then play that from my myth box at the click of a button. A VERY handy thing to have with a house full of children. No more lost DVDs, scratched or otherwise unwatchable discs. Just quick and simple click of the button.

      Oh, this method provides you with the opportunity to remove the ads before the movie as well. Disney being the worst offender.

      So do yourself a favor and learn about a software package before you badmouth it. I just pointed out something that no commercial PVR will likely EVER have, yet is so damn useful it could be it's own product.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    22. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by clamantis · · Score: 1

      "to say that a homebrew DVR is not functional because there is no CableCard support in Linux is just plain wrong."

      Totally agree. This isn't a MythTV problem; MythTV can handle the HD stream just fine.

      I'd gladly lease another CableCard for my MythTV box if there was a tuner available that supported it. The only one I've ever heard of is this one, which is still not out even for Vista ... at least I don't see it on ATI's website as available to end users. And I doubt it works with Linux :-(

    23. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, they've forced you. Well then, it's all justified. I had a big rant prepared for you until I saw that they were taking away your entertainment, against all reasonable sense of entitlement. Pirate away!

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    24. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. This isn't a MythTV problem; MythTV can handle the HD stream just fine.

      While it's true that it's not a MythTV problem per se, it doesn't change the fact that it's still not an option.

      That being said, I'd be in line for a Linux supported CableCard device too, it'd save the trouble of re-encoding HD encrypted shows, as Myth is my only form of a TV.
      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    25. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      While having a system that can suck down movies that are 20G a pop sounds nice in theory, it kind of falls apart once you start to really think about it. Short of having 20TB drives (or arrays) or having realtime H.264 transcoding capabilities such a system is going to be all that it's cracked up to be.

      OTOH, an HD PVR driven by a MythTV backend could be a handy thing.

      Quality of signal is more important than resolution.

      You can even see this with different HD channels.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    26. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Setup a couple of broad category wishlists and you will probably be quite amazed with what you can pick up from non-premium channels. A lot of it is mutiliated but still there's a lot of stuff out there if you have an agressive PVR and LOTS of storage space to dump it all.

      This is why I think any PVR without at least 200 of recording time (even in HD) is going to be a non-starter.

      Ok, fine so I've got my 5 movies recorded in HD and nothing else on the thing. My 20 episodes of 20 network shows are all gone because they had to be expired to make room for the big fat HD movies.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    27. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Noone can tell the difference between true HD and downconverted SD?

      I think what the parent is getting at, is that it's possible to capture analog HD from the cablebox and re-encode it. True, it's a lot of wasted processing power and some detail will be lost in the dual conversion, but it's not the stand-out difference some might expect.
      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    28. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Until I can get CableCARD support in a home-built Linux box (and I know I never will) Myth is completely irrelevant. A set-top DVR is the only choice for a more-than-minimally-functional system.

      Wow, thanks for dimissing an entire community of hobbyists based on your pre-conceived notion. For you MythTV is just a "more-than-minimally-functional system" but for others, MythTV has everything they want. MythTV systems offer features not found in a set-top DVR and vice versa. All and all MythTV has more features than a regular DVR. However, with MythTV you can control the features that you want. A short list of things that MythTV has that a set-top DVR does not:

      Web Brower (although you can hack some DVRs)

      Game emulator

      Weather

      RSS News feeds

      Video conferencing

      What makes MythTV much more powerful is in variety of configurations and you could make it as fully or minimally featured as you wish. I don't use some features but others do. The last time I checked, you couldn't record 4 shows simultaneously and browse the web on a set-top DVR.

      The CableCARD only is for encrypted digital content like digital cable. Personally I don't use TV-on-demand so this is not useful for me personally. I don't have a HDTV so the HD feeds are also meaningless for me. However, if I wanted to use a CableCARD, the community has developed some solutions. They require a cablebox with a CableCARD, but it allows people to get digital cable and use MythTV.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    29. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      In general it is pretty good at changing the channels, there times when it does not change the channel correctly.

      Then it's not set up terribly well. I have a pair of DCT2524's controlled by my Myth box using a pair of blasters from here, and I have never, repeat, never missed a single tune.

    30. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      I thought I read where they had to enable the firewire port (by law) if requested.

      The parent is probably referring to the firewire port being encrypted and not actually disabled. For MythTv purposes, the net effect is the same.
      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    31. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Can it record two channels at the same time?

      Yes. I have two tuners on my Myth box connected to two DSTBs. If you'd done any reading at all, you'd know this.

      Can it record an HD signal at full resolution without recompressing it?

      Of course, not, but we both know that's a rhetorical question. OTOH, downconverted HD still looks pretty friggin' good. And there's firewire or ATSC capture options for some.

      But I will agree, the fact that Tivo is in bed with the cable industry does give them an advantage, here.

    32. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      In the U.S., at least, Cablecard is the only way for someone with cable to receive the digital channels (i.e. channels 60-1000) without using the cable company's own cable box. It's a card that fits into a slot on your DVR that allows it to decrypt the digital channels.

      While that is true if the signal is encrypted, unencrypted digital content can be captured via firewire through a compatible cable box. Of course, unencrypted shows are hard to come by- What's encrypted and unencrypted depends on the cable provider from what I understand.
      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    33. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by |/rad|/oder · · Score: 1

      Looks to me like an HD TiVo would be able to tape shows on HBO and Showtime at the same time.

      Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but MythTV + IR blaster + STB simply won't provide that. Nor any dual-tuner functionality that isn't OTA afaik.

      So which comment was "irrelevant" again?

      --
      but then again, commenting on a katz story is almost as self-serving as the katz story itself. -tensionboy
    34. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      So do yourself a favor and learn about a software package before you badmouth it. I just pointed out something that no commercial PVR will likely EVER have, yet is so damn useful it could be it's own product.


      While it's a great feature, it's not what they wanted. If you're looking for built-in HD Cable support without re-encoding, having all your DVD's in one box doesn't do much for you.

      There are commecial central DVD servers out there, Kaleidescape is probably the best known, possibly for it's $27,000 price tag and a lawsuit or two.
      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    35. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually pretty easy these days. You can use a kernel loopback device to perform the decryption invisibly to Myth, or any other capture program for that matter. It's everyone's right to be able to view the content they are paying for.

    36. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by edmicman · · Score: 1

      When you use the IR blaster, doesn't that essentially take over your STB then? Are you able to record a show off your STB, and then watch another digital show at the same time? Record two digital shows at the same time and watch a third? I thought those were the hitches with using the IR blasters....

    37. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jotok · · Score: 1

      No, you'd only need more than one STB.

      Is it more complex a setup than a simple DVR appliance? Yes.
      Is it still cheaper? Yes.
      Does it allow you greater freedom to watch your shows wherever you want? Yes.

      There's obviously a tradeoff there, but once again, to argue that the TiVo has some capability that you cannot recreate with a Myth box is wholly wrong. It may be that you do not wish to expend the time or that you prefer the simplicity of a TiVo, but please don't confuse your personal preferences with facts.

    38. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I totally agree about IR Blasters, they just suck outright. The strange thing is, on my Tivo it never misses a digit, but a lot of times it will stall for a second or two between digits, causing my cable box to switch to the wrong channel (For instance, if it wants to go to channel 100, it will spam out 1 and 0, then pause long enough for the box to switch to channel 10 before spitting out the last 0). It drives me batty to see that happen on a show I like.

      The worst part is that the cable box has a serial port in the back that theoretically a TiVo can use to change the channel instead. Unfortunately Verizon is evil and decided to disable that port for no reason. I even talked with one of the tech guys at Verizon and he said that they're asking the manufacturer to disable them in their new boxes. I'm guessing it's leftover hate of humanity they have from being a local phone company.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    39. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      You do realize the poster was talking about a TV recording solution, right? That's why they mentioned cablecard. Telling them that MythTV is better because it can play copied DVDs (or video game emulators, or music) is a fairly moot point. It still doesn't do the core thing he needs. It's like he wanted a truck that would drive off-road and you pointed out all the cool luxury features in your new mercedes sedan. How comfortable the seats are doesn't really matter. The fact that you can control your mp3 player through eye movements doesn't matter. It still won't go off-road!

      So his badmouthing is right on target. You take his quote out of context to make it sound like he's saying the software has very few features. But it was posted in conjunction with him saying that he needs it to use cablecard. It simply cannot do the core thing he needs it to do, which is record the signal from the tv channels he gets.

    40. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by demon · · Score: 1

      CableCard currently has nothing to do with on-demand content; supposedly CableCard 2.0 is going to extend CableCard's functionality to two-way communication, adding on-demand, PPV and so forth. For now, however, if you want to be able to get cable and watch anything more than your locals in high-def (I do!), then you're kinda SOL with MythTV. CableLabs will likely never certify a non-closed system for attachment to cable company networks, and cable operators won't give you a CableCard for it - even if you could find a board to carry the card. If you don't care about that, that's fine, but some people do...

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    41. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by croddy · · Score: 1

      Now I wish I'd never asked. That's about the most onerous piece of hardware you could have possibly described.

    42. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      Hey, Sherlock, you do realize his comment is on an article comparing MythTV to Tivo for use as a DVR , right?

      God, I'm getting sick of hearing this over and over again. I can't wait until the next article that compares OpenOffice to Office points out the lack of compatibility of macros. Then someone will post about how OpenOffice is clearly superior because it has a built in webserver, a plugin to control your audio player, and the hilarious ability to show you what your documents would look like if written by the Swedish Chef.

    43. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jotok · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is precisely the issue with using an IR blaster--because cablecard is not supported in Linux, your myth box needs to hijack the STB in order to record your shows. The solution is to simply get more than one STB. My Myth setup has a frontend which is used almost exclusively for playback (and mythgame and so forth) while there is a backend containing the capture cards and controlling an STB (when I was capturing only SD I had two STBs).

      This is not a GREAT solution, and in fact it turns off most people I talk to, but it does "work."

    44. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1

      My Myth setup simply uses an IR blaster to interact with the set-top box. It does precisely everything the latest HD TiVo does.

      Including being able to record two (possibly HD) shows at once? My understanding of the set-top boxes was that they can only do one channel at a time.

      Doug

    45. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you'd only need more than one STB.

      Is it more complex a setup than a simple DVR appliance? Yes.
      Is it still cheaper? Yes.
      Does it allow you greater freedom to watch your shows wherever you want? Yes.

      There's obviously a tradeoff there, but once again, to argue that the TiVo has some capability that you cannot recreate with a Myth box is wholly wrong. It may be that you do not wish to expend the time or that you prefer the simplicity of a TiVo, but please don't confuse your personal preferences with facts.


      MythTV is still cheaper? Not here it isn't.

      MythTV + 2 Set Top Boxes monthly lease rate: $17.90
      TiVo Series 3 w/Lifetime Subscription - 2 CableCARDs monthly lease rate: $5.00
      TiVo Series 3 w/3 year Subscription fee + 2 CableCARDs monthly lease rate: $13.31

      I'd venture to say that for most areas, the cost of leasing two set top boxes costs roughly the same as the monthly rate of the TiVo 3 year prepaid plan plus a lease on two CableCARDs.

      please don't confuse your personal preferences with facts seems to apply to you as well.

    46. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by ballwall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't necessarily agree that downloading is ok, but just wanted to play the devil's advocate for a second.

      Take these scenarios:

      1. Let's say you have a VCR recording over the air broadcasts, and it's set to record Heroes on Monday. It does and you happily watch your show, commercials and all. Morally acceptable, right?

      2. Ok, same thing, except you fast forward through the commericials. Is this still morally acceptable? Really you're not upholding your part of the bargain (watching commercials) for the free TV you're getting.

      3. Ok, so now you discover on Tuesday that your VCR didn't change timezones properly (something about DST being moved forward or some other nonsense), and didn't record Heroes for you. You download it with commericials and watch it. Is that bad? Is there a fundamental difference between this and the first scenario?

      4. Or, say you download it with no commercials, how is that different at all than the second scenario?

      Where exactly does downloading previously broadcast material become immoral?

    47. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CableCARD is broken by design. That you consider it a required "feature" says more about your lowered expectations than the abilities of MythTV.

    48. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No not justified. Just cause and effect. I am proud to break the law, I get JOY out of violently downloading these tv shows, which by doing so helps the terrorists, makes Tv networks crumble and puts people out of work.. We all know that the Cast of LOST are living in cardboard boxes and eating expired ramen they heat in old soup cans over candles because I bittorrent their TV show and watch it when I want instead of paying the $5.00 a month to the cable company for their crappy PVR box. Oh, and I also cause the downfall of freedom everywhere because I have the gall to want to watch it elsewhere than in front of my TV on that cable box.

      I am evil incarnate, I make Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong Ill look like saints. I am the Evil that will consume the world! MUAHAHAHAHA!

      Actually I dont give a shit about any law that is stupid. and ALL content protection laws are stupid. I encourage everyone I know to break these laws whenever possible.

      I also suggest you do the same. In fact I think I'll go teach some kids how to do it. First hit is free, and then.... well all those hits are free as well.

    49. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      CableCARD isn't just about control, it's about being able to watch encrypted (movie channels/HD) signals.

    50. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      So, how exactly do *you* record HBO/ESPN/Discovery Channel in HD using MythTV?

      Oh, you don't.

      OR

      Oh, you down-convert them.

      Either way, now we're REALLY talking "lowered expectations".

    51. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      You take his quote out of context to make it sound like he's saying the software has very few features.

      I quoted just about EVERYTHING in his post. It would be very difficult to take it out of context. I propose, instead, that he didn't say what he meant to say. PVR stands for Personal Video Recorder. Not Personal TV Recorder. His quote once again;

      A set-top DVR is the only choice for a more-than-minimally-functional system.

      minimally functional is what I'd call commercial DVR ( there's that pesky acronym again ) solutions, and that's what I take issue with. Now, if you are proposing that he meant to say this;

      A set-top DVR used explicitly for HD content is the only choice for a more-than-minimally-function system.

      I would not have an argument, as I haven't played with the HD scene on myth. It exists, and by it's very existence it implies a certain usability, but I know nothing about it.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    52. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by illegalcortex · · Score: 1
      Actually, you cut out half of what he was saying. First half:

      Until I can get CableCARD support in a home-built Linux box (and I know I never will) Myth is completely irrelevant.
      Okay, so he needs CableCARD support. Why might that be? Could it be because he needs to RECORD TV? And could it be because CableCARD is necessary to record encrypted HD broadcasts?

      I think his statement was very clear. Especially when it's posted to an article that had the summary:

      "How different are the two systems' available remote control devices and their graphic interfaces when it comes to ease of use? Which product should you choose if your HD signal comes OTA or if you plan to use CableCARDs? And what software features (present and future) can you expect with each product? Will loopholes in FCC regulations and cable company encryption ultimately squeeze out MythTV and other open source players?"
      How can you be so obtuse? Is it deliberate?
    53. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      Well, first off, I said "Until I can get CableCARD support in a home-built Linux box" not "Until YOU can get CableCARD support in a home-built Linux box..." Unlike you, I do watch HDTV (and not just OTA stations) so a DVR that can't decrypt the signals is about worthless to me (which is why I referred to me, not you or everyone else). I didn't dismiss an entire community of linux users any more than you dismissed an entire community of HDTV DVR users. Or did you?

      Second, this article is about comparing the systems _AS DVRs_. The rest of the stuff you're talking about is just fluff in this context.

      Third, CableCARD doesn't currently do on-demand (that will be CableCARD 2.0), but I don't do on-demand anyway. Not relevant at all.

      And while I may not be able to record (all?) four OTA HD channels simultaneously, I can record (_any_)two HD channels simultaneously with my (non-Tivo) set-top HD DVR. As someone who actually watches HDTV, Myth is completely inadequate without CableCARD.

    54. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by pilardi · · Score: 1

      Cablecard is the only way for someone with cable to receive the digital channels (i.e. channels 60-1000) without using the cable company's own cable box. That is false. I use a QAM tuner (pcHDTV HD3000) to receive digital and HD channels from my cable company, including ones that aren't available analog (100+), plus about 100 digital music channels.

      However I can't get the premium channels (HBO/Showtime), since those are encrypted. Though I don't really care about those channels.

      Also, according to the FCC, cable boxes with firewire outputs must be available by your cable company. You can use these with MythTV. However, I tried to get one from my cable company with no luck. Most people I talked to had no clue what I was talking about, and when I finally got someone to deliver a box, they sent one without the firewire out. So I gave up on that and focused on the QAM solution.
    55. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "If you'd done any reading at all, you'd know this."

      Oh, come on now. I just read Go Dog Go, AND The Pokey Little Puppy last night, and neither one said anything about your cable setup.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    56. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by pilardi · · Score: 1
      I use MythTV with digital cable using a QAM tuner. I am able to get all channels (including hi-def) digitally except for the premium ones (which I don't subscribe to anyway).

      A set-top DVR is the only choice for a more-than-minimally-functional system. That's just ridiculous. I'd like to see you remotely schedule show and stream video over the internet with a set-top DVR from your cable company. MythTV can do this and a lot more.

      A MythTV box is the only choice for a more-than-minimally-functional system.
    57. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I was about to respond, but illegalcortex covered it all quite well for me.

    58. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I use the bittorrent card.

      Until you get shut off for competing with the cable company.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    59. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      4. Or, say you download it with no commercials, how is that different at all than the second scenario?

      Where exactly does downloading previously broadcast material become immoral?

      Unless that material was broadcast over the airwaves for anyone to tune in to, it's not free. Cable TV signals don't just magically reach your house, you have to pay a monthly fee to a cable company. The studios don't give their content away to cable companies for free so that those cable companies can make a huge profit, obviously that material costs money. That's also why they have things like commercials, product placement ads, etc..

      Let's pretend at some point in the future everyone stops paying for TV and starts downloading via bittorrent. How would the studios make money? Now the typical slashdotter might say "Who cares? They're a rich corporation, fuck 'em!", well sorry, but they have a right to be paid for their service just like anyone else. If no one got paid for making TV shows, there would be no new TV shows, unless the studios can somehow survive only on product placement revenue.

      *Yes, I download TV shows (mainly Daily Show episodes that I miss and South Park from MrTwig.net) so I may be a little hypocritical.
    60. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by sean.peters · · Score: 1

      2. Ok, same thing, except you fast forward through the commericials. Is this still morally acceptable? Really you're not upholding your part of the bargain (watching commercials) for the free TV you're getting.

      This is where you go off track - there is no bargain. I didn't agree to watch any commercials as a price of watching the rest of the show. The broadcaster put commercials in there in hopes that I would watch them, but I never promised to do so.

      I'm not sure if this means that ad-supported television is doomed... but frankly, as I literally never watch it, I really don't care that much.

    61. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jeaton · · Score: 1

      I can very clearly tell the difference between the HD and non-HD versions of the channels. If you can't, great. Use MythTV.

      But there exists no way to use MythTV for precisely what a TiVo Series 3 does today - record and play back all of the available HD channels provided by my cable provider. I specifically wanted to do this. I looked at MythTV. It isn't capable.

    62. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Umm... get a second STB? Or buy one of those ultracheap digital-analog converters the US government will be subsidizing.

    63. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by ballwall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, I agree with you that it's not right to download it if you're not paying for access in the first place. But the actual /act/ of downloading it is not what makes it wrong, rather downloading it when you're not entitles to view it in the first place.

      Now, for your second point, no one 'pays for' over the air TV, at least not the viewers. Advertisers are the ones paying for broadcast TV. So, which scenario is on shaky ground: downloading with commercials included, or Tivoing and skipping commercials? The first one is the illegal one, while I think the second is the immoral one. (Not that this stops me from skipping commercials).

      Following the same logic, if I pay for cable, what is the fundamental difference between downloading an episode with no commercials and Tivoing it?

    64. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "It's just like a tivo except it extracts the commercials and compresses them to mpeg4 so it's even easy for me to take them on my laptop."

      You watch the extracted commercials on you laptop?

      You must be in Marketing.

    65. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by sbeener · · Score: 1

      I don't necessarily (dis)agree that downloading is ok either but...

      A big part of funding TV shows and films, documentaries, et al. is selling broadcast rights. These are generally divided into "windows" - first window, second window, and so on.

      If first window means everyone now has unfettered access to the media, producers trying to get funding lose a significant amount of leverage with the broadcasters. I'm not just talking TV shows (which I could hardly care less about), all kinds of independent media that I do care about is subject to this same funding model.

      So equating a singular broadcast with an ad-free bittorrent available 100% of the time is not entirely fair because having the media so freely available reduces the value of the windows subsequent to the first and hurts producers trying to find funding from broadcasters.

      Should these producers investigate business models that leverage the advantages of bittorrent? Sure, absolutely, but it's risky and these are small players working with tiny budgets who are often at the whim of broadcasters who are paying the lion's share of the bills.

      It's hard to call this cut-and-dried. There's a lot of gray area here.

    66. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Well, the guy you're downloading from is probably committing copyright infringement, but that's for him to worry about.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    67. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what the neighbors Open access points are for :-)

      BTW: simply set up and download throttles and the Cable company will never notice. If it takes 12 hours to get last nights 2 hours of TV shows, who cares... The cable company is not bright enough to detect that.

    68. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5) you pay the cable company to get all these shows, so feel free to skip the commercials. I have a VCR that does this for me. Oh wait, the cable company gets paid by the content providers and the viewers while creating absolutely NOTHING. They pay off local governments to stop muni-wifi etc... who's in the wrong?
      6) No one ever said watching the commercials was compulsory. Ever get up to go to the bathroom during a commercial? Shame on you - you're a pirate.
      7) Ever watch PBS? it's a totally different business model. There are alternatives to being a big giant PITA company.
      Just dump the cable and go with OTA HD. Stop paying these guys for doing nothing.

    69. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Builder · · Score: 1

      Can you post some more information about this ? I don't really understand what a CAM is, but I'm desperate for any way to get Sky working with MythTV

    70. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, no TV shows for anyone? That'd be horrible! People might have to open up a book or something.

    71. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      TIVO is in bed with the cable industry? Wow, that's news to me! I thought they just finished suing ComCast and winning.... oh yeah they did - is that how you get in bed with an industry, sue them?

      TIVO had a heck of a time getting their CableCard approval and had to DROP features in order to get it. They have also sued at least one cable provider over their use of TIVO patented features - and won. Just because TIVO can work well with cable companies does *not* mean they are in bed with them somehow. They are not friends...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    72. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      TIVO had a heck of a time getting their CableCard approval and had to DROP features in order to get it.

      Exactly my point.

      They have also sued at least one cable provider over their use of TIVO patented features

      So they're willing to screw customers to get CableCard support, *and* sue the cable industry over patents. Apparently they're even more desperate and screwed up than I thought.

      Just because TIVO can work well with cable companies does *not* mean they are in bed with them somehow

      Fine, allow me to rephrase. TIVO is willing to cowtow to the cable industry and screw their customers (such as dropping 30 second commercial skip support) when it serves their motives. I fail to see how this is any better.

    73. Re:CableCARD is all that matters by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      God you are thick aren't you? Let me put it to you clearly - TIVO wished to release a product and not be sued into the ground ala ReplayTV. You're anger towards TIVO is completely misplaced - want to be pissed try being pissed at the guys who would SUE them if they released an HD TIVO that allowed for multi-room viewing and extraction. TIVo would sell more boxes if they could put those features in and ARGUED to get those features approved - nope not happening uis what CableLabs said. So in order to umm actually produce a product they dropped the features to get the approval. How hard, exactly, is that to understand? Are you 12?

      In your sunny world they would have sold the box anyway, certification be damned. Then the cable guy would show up with his cablecard, look at the device, declare in unapproved, and taken his shiney cablecard home. Gee, that really worked didn't it? Or wait not sold the box at all and then you'd be whining because they didn't support HD or weren't "innovating". You just like to whine right?

      Oh and TIVO has never taken away the 30second skip, it exists in ALL of the TIVO products including the S3. It was never something that could be turned on via a GUI setting, it was always this silly goofy key sequence. You've not ever owned a TIVO have you? It shows....

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  14. Re:TiVo wins of course... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    So how about you come join the Unreal Tournament server I just started on my Myth TV box with your Tivo? Oh wait, you can't...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  15. Re:TiVo wins of course... by montyzooooma · · Score: 1
    "Oh, Theres a mythtv for windows?"

    I know you're joking but there is http://www.gbpvr.com/

  16. Re:TiVo wins of course... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    (and its not as hard as you make out)

    Well, I just read the TF installation Manual and it seems quite complicated. Mostly due to the hundreds of different hardware that is not compatible or will not work one way or another in Linux.

    From what I have read so far (from chapter 1 to 4, without counting: Download&Compile, Config Sound, MySQl,Setup Remote Control, Configuring MythTV, Configuring Frontend, installing Plugins, Troubleshooting) it seems you will need to spend a good 5 hours of your time just to make sure the components you buy are all compatible. At $200 the hour this is $1000 of my time (without including the cost of the hardware and config). Against $200 for a year of Tivo...

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  17. Re:TiVo wins of course... by dwandy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I get this same argument discussing linux vs windows.

    Granting someone else control over your box may* make it easier for you to use, but it sure as hell isn't your box anymore.
    Back on the topic of media specifically, I'm afraid that most people have no idea how much the BigCo's are pushing for control. If people knew, would they care? I doubt most people will even see a problem with broadcast flags and devices that refuse to play content...
    People are complacent, and have learned to accept a (imho) fairly high level of suck in exchange for not having to think.

    (*But no guarantee ... while I have no 1st hand experience with it, Vista reads like a nightmare compared to any reasonable modern distro)

    --
    If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
  18. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Informative

    You know that part about not being as hard as you make it out to be? You should have paid attention to that. Get knoppmyth burn to CD, boot from it and you are off and running. That pretty much works out of the box for ~80% of the people who try it.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  19. The thing that bugs me the most with Myth... by 1010110010 · · Score: 1

    ... actually has nothing to do with its core function (pvr). It's the fact that the video and game plugins operate with information stored in the database. In theory this is fine, it lets you add covers, information, etc. The problem is it means you have to refresh the information whenever you add things to your directories, and if you're downloading IPTV stuff fairly often that's a pain. I wish it would have the option of just browsing the directories.

    1. Re:The thing that bugs me the most with Myth... by legoburner · · Score: 1

      The latest (subversion) version has an option for using the video manager as a way of browsing the directories. It actually just automatically re-scans your video folder if it detects anything has changed, which means you get a delay when clicking on the menu - still far from ideal, but at least there is no longer a need to go to the setup menu to view a new video.

    2. Re:The thing that bugs me the most with Myth... by Uteck · · Score: 1

      Version .20 will read the contents of a directory and display them, but you have to go back to the main screen, then select videos to force it to rescan the directory. You may have to enable this function in the setup, otherwise you you have to run the video manager to see new items.

      --
      no .sig found Please restart your browser.
    3. Re:The thing that bugs me the most with Myth... by Lee148 · · Score: 1

      For videos at least, MythTV can now (0.20 perhaps before) browse the directory whenever you go into the Video List. You may have to check some checkboxes in the Video Settings.

    4. Re:The thing that bugs me the most with Myth... by james_orr · · Score: 1

      "I wish it would have the option of just browsing the directories."

      It does.

    5. Re:The thing that bugs me the most with Myth... by Locklin · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem as my "movies" directory spans a couple hundred movies. It was taking upwards of 5 minutes to scan them every time I tried to browse.

      The problem is not the database, however, it is that myth defaults to try to "find" information for each and every file -utilizing major bandwidth/cpu cycles. You can turn off the setting and there is no longer a problematic delay. Look for a setting that says "this may significantly slow down loading" when you highlight it.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  20. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Famatra · · Score: 1

    "TIVO: Sorry, I've deleted that show"

    It can get even worse than that though.

    'Sorry, I've deleted that clip' of $president-leader saying something wrong/foolish/a lie. Now they just have to make sure all hardware complies with their 'accidental' delete requests and they'll be set.

  21. Re:TiVo wins of course... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People are complacent, and have learned to accept a (imho) fairly high level of suck in exchange for not having to think.

    To a significant degree, I think you're correct. Look at what Microsoft foisted upon the world, in the form of Win9X. Talk about your high level of suck ... and we accepted it! However, at a certain point you have to improve matters because too much suck causes lost sales, and gives the competition an edge. The problem with the entertainment people is that they don't want any competition, thereby allowing them a free hand to shove as much as suck at us as they want. People would probably scream bloody murder if they were told that, by Federal law, only Windows boxes could be used or sold in the United States. They don't, however, seem to have as much of a problem with having that level of control applied to their software or their entertainment (which is, after all, just more software.)

    That bothers me.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  22. Nah, it just needs to get smarter by arodland · · Score: 1

    MPD keeps a database of all of your music, but you can update it at any time from within the client, and (except for the first time) a database update takes about 3 seconds. If MythVideo worked that well, didn't make you go way out of your way to do the update, and didn't recheck everything even if stat() says it shouldn't have changed, it would be just fine :)

    (Incidentally if you ask me, MythMusic should be an MPD frontend... but that's a project for another day :)

  23. Re:TiVo wins of course... by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Insightful
    5 hours of your time just to make sure the components you buy are all compatible. At $200 the hour this is $1000 of my time

    This is a device for watching television. You are building/buying this device so that you can sit in front of the idiot box like a slack-jawed yokel for thousands of hours. You're complaining that the 5 hours learning how to set-up MythTV is the waste?

    What rate do you want to bill the universe for your TV-watching hours? Go for $450/hr; it sounds even more impressive. Your TV watching hobby might be costing you $200,000 per year, OMFG!

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  24. Re:TiVo wins of course... by frogstar_robot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Invariably when KnoppMyth is mentioned, several sombodies will complain it is out of date. Valid enough but pointing my newly installed machine at Debian Testing and apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade took care of that.

  25. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Not+Public · · Score: 2, Insightful

    unfortunately, as much as I love the idea of my mythtv... I've had the opposite experience.
    I've got nfs share over wireless (802.11g) that randomly disconnects itself when idle. and mythtv & the nfs & the wireless require a reboot to function. unfortunately, due to sequencing and timing of boot, the nfs share doesn't always reconnect at boot, and I'm not always able to remember to check the the wireless connection is up, before I check the nfs share to mount the share, before I boot mythtv. If I get in a hurry, or forget to check something- I have to reboot. not that I can blame these issues 100% on mythtv, but unfortunately, it does rely on some inconsistent technologies as I've implemented it. maybe if I had a cat6 run between machines and maybe if i had a better file server it wouldn't choke... but that's not an option for me.

    Now when it works, it works wonderfully for watching downloaded video.

    when it works.

  26. Re:TiVo wins of course... by mrand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know that part about not being as hard as you make it out to be? You should have paid attention to that. Get knoppmyth burn to CD, boot from it and you are off and running. That pretty much works out of the box for ~80% of the people who try it. Ok, I'll bite.

    I've wanted a HTPC for quite a while now, and have A LITTLE time coming this spring to do it. How does knoppmyth compare to mythdora? What other acceptable solutions are out there besides those two (ignoring Media center)? I'm willing to pay some dollars for it (so it doesn't HAVE to be free, although that's certainly nice), but I want control over the media ... i.e. without Tivo or Microsoft dictating what I can and can't record.

          Marc
    --
    -- PGP keyID: 0x4C95994D
  27. Re:TiVo wins of course... by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
    Oh, Theres a mythtv for windows?

    No, he's using "FUDbuntu: The distro that uses 'reboot' to fix problems."

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  28. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Drawsalot · · Score: 1

    It's not free, but I'll stick to BeyondTV. It wasn't that expensive, and worked with my card and computer right out of the box with no hassles. GBPVR didn't work for me.

  29. Re:TiVo wins of course... by matt328 · · Score: 1

    Who would have thought running DVR software on a Linux platform would require knowledge of Linux?

    --
    Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
  30. HDCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TIVO is merely another link in the " we want your money so we are crippling your hardware " chain.

    MythTV empowers me to do what I want with my hardware. That is the difference I see.

    The only bitch I have is HDCP.

    HDCP removes my ability to output my home movies from DVI to HDMI while attempting to prevent me from watching content some *AA thinks I would pay to see.

    I have consulted a lawyer and am looking into a class action lawsuit.

    My hardware.

    My content.

    You do not have the right to limit what I do with it. Especially when you could have a switch that disabled HDCP on the HDMI connection when I am watching non protected material.

    If you the HDCP people think I should output DVI to component then why is HDMI superior to component and why should I buy HDMI ? Are you not marketing it as superior quality ?

  31. I love MythTV because... by myz24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I can run the frontend on my laptop and watch live and recorded TV anywhere in my house. I don't yet use Myth for anything but TV using an 8 year old Hauppauge card but for me, the flexibility of the software is what wins me over. My only gripe is the default keyboard bindings don't make the most sense at first.

  32. MythTV vs. Tivo vs. Cable PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All PVR solutions have their pros and cons.

    Mythtv
    Pros: Most flexible when it comes to content. Goes beyond PVR capability with various plugins, like one for emulators.
    Cons: Still difficult to setup for most people. Can also be time consuming to setup and maintain.

    Tivo
    Pros: Nice interface. Can learn based on your viewing habits.
    Cons: Most expensive option, with the initial cost of the Tivo box, $19.95 for service (month-to-month) and additional costs related to an extra cable box/cablecard if you want to dual tuner capability. Also more restrictive of the recorded content than MythTV.

    Cable PVR
    Pros: Least expensive option. Easiest to setup (usually done by the cable company).
    Cons: Most restrictive of the three when it comes to content.

  33. Re:TiVo wins of course... by JWW · · Score: 1

    I've got nfs share over wireless (802.11g) that randomly disconnects itself when idle.

    Check the firmware on your router, or alternately check you DHCP server. I had a version of dd-wrt on my linksys whose DHCP would fail to hand out addresses after about a day, requiring me to reboot the router to get DHCP going again. Though for Myth, wired capability to the file server is always desirable.

    and mythtv & the nfs & the wireless require a reboot to function.

    It shouldn't require rebooting. Between the network startup and shutdown scripts, mount, and just stopping and starting mythbackend (which I actually have a watch script that checks to make sure its up that restarts it if necessary), none of these things should require a reboot.

  34. The modern consumer called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wants to use three computers to record six concurrect Saturday night live sports games, action films and a Lost episode, adding them to his private entertainment collection for watching on Sunday night or any time in the future while skipping all the commercials. If he is not allowed to do this he says he feels like a bug under the thumb of the broadcast companies, and will vote for a party that will let him do it.

  35. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compared to Tivo? ok... Hey I want to record Discovery HD on cable.... wait, why cant I tune in Discovery HD? what is the deal here? I cant recieve any of my HD channels except for 2 of them I paid how much for this piece of crap?

    THE ONLY useable PVR for HD is the one your cable company rents you. the Tivo sucks, Mythtv sucks, Windows MCE really sucks, etc.... and this is on purpose.

    The cable companies do not WANT you to have a PVR that is not under their control. There are going to be some Windows vista MCE boxes that will be blessed and will be allowed to have a cablecard to tune in your HD goodness, but those will protect that innocent content from evil you.

    Tivo series 3 sucks. Mythtv sucks, All of them suck. Because the Content providers are raging assholes.

    It's as simple as that.

    Now, Tivo may get cablecard working soon and save their butts. But I know that all networkability will be disabled on it

  36. Re:TiVo wins of course... by AusIV · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To be fair, I've never used a Tivo. I have used a number of other DVRs provided by cable companies, and I'll take MythTV any day. The others I've used won't allow you to short your shows by TV show. When you have over 350 shows recorded, this is a must. I also have a 400 GB RAID for storage. Other DVRs will allow an eSATA drive, so they can get up to 500 GB, but lets hope you don't have a drive failure. MythTV also has a nice web interface, so I can set shows to record whether I'm in my room or across the country. My MythTV box has been up for a solid month without any problems, and I only rebooted then to try out a new Live CD and see if it would auto-detect my RAID. While I have had some more serious issues with MythTV, it's been 6 months, and I've upgraded both MythTV and my distro since then and it's been completely reliable. Tivo may be a cut above the other DVRs offered by my cable company, but MythTV puts the DVRs I've used to shame.

  37. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $200 an hour? Yeah, right. 400k a year execs don't post on slashdot.

    Unless you're pricing your leisure time way above your work time... in which case you should quit your job.

  38. International Use by funkyjunkman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a happy customer of Tivo for several years now I am quite disappointed to find that it will not work for me if I move to Australia.

    I have been doing a little research on MythTV (again) and still am off put by the complexity of it. The Tivo box really is my OS X to MythTVs Windows, in my opinion. But an even bigger issue to me is if I had to start paying a monthly fee to Tivo since they dropped their lifetime support fee option.

    ps. The article was so lean on details I wonder if the writer even touched either a Tivo or MythTV box.

    1. Re:International Use by Arceliar · · Score: 1

      Calling TiVo OS X and MythTV Windows may be the most backwards thing I've ever heard. Especially considering they both run (primarily) off linux kernels.

      MythTV is great once it has been set up, which Knoppmyth takes care of quite well IMHO. And I believe Myth is fully functional anywhere you go, so long as the hardware still runs and has a compatible recorder. So, power cord issues aside it seems a viable means of recording while overseas.

      But ultimately the kicker for me, the reason I built a MythTV box instead of buying a TiVo, was service fees. I don't see why I should pay for something I already own, particularly on a questionably closed piece of hardware running open source software.

    2. Re:International Use by Vengeance_au · · Score: 1

      Check out the ozTivo group. Depending on the Tivo model you have, you might still be in luck. And if you don't have the right model but someone else you know state-side does, you might want to organise a swap before you come over here :-).

    3. Re:International Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I have been doing a little research on MythTV (again) and still am off put by the complexity of it. The Tivo box really is my OS X to MythTVs Windows, in my opinion. But an even bigger issue to me is if I had to start paying a monthly fee to Tivo since they dropped their lifetime support fee option."

      Windows Media Center (included in Vista Home Premium and XP Media Center Edition) has no monthly fees for its TV Program Guide. Its DVR features are as easy to use as TiVo. It doesn't do as much as MythTV, but it's much easier to setup and use.

      Windows Media Center can be your OS X to TiVo's Windows. Yes, that's what I meant.

  39. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Look at what Microsoft foisted upon the world, in the form of Win9X. Talk about your high level of suck ... and we accepted it! Not for all of us. Win9x existed solely on a separate partition for the couple of games that weren't supported on OS/2. Linux just wasn't up to the job at the time of playing desktop, although it made a damn good server even back then.
    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  40. Re:TiVo wins of course... by jotok · · Score: 1

    Or, you could follow Jarod's Wilson's Step-by-step guide to building a MythTV System on Fedora Core 6 w/ATrpms which takes about an hour, including installing FC6. Since the majority of that time does not require interaction on the part of the user, surely you should pro-rate the hourly cost.

    Oh, and as an added bonus, the site details what hardware you need to get in order to make sure you won't have hardware issues: so assuming you have an old computer lying around (otherwise, why would you complain about incompatibilities?), you only need to purchase about $200 in video hardware.

    So, let's say you have now expended $300 in real and opportunity cost to build this HD Myth Box. A similar TiVo product would run you ~$1030 in the first year (oh! you didn't know that the HD TiVo starts at around $800? $200 indeed).

    So, the realities are $300 vs. $1000. If you want to piss away 5 hours' salary on something, that's on you, but it's an illegitimate claim to make that it is too difficult to justify the time investment to set up a Myth box.

  41. As a MythTV user... by edmicman · · Score: 5, Informative

    of going on 2 years, I'd have to say it's not even close - Tivo wins for the masses. Sure, my MythTV box does what my friends' Tivos do and more. But even though they are tech guys, too, I don't see many of them going through the pain in the ass experience that is setting up and maintaining the MythTV box.

    I built my MythTV box a couple of years ago so I could record two shows at the same time (dual tuner PVR500 card) and then watch a third on our main cable. I planned on reusing olds parts as I had a fairly decent PC sitting around unused; all I needed to invest in was the tuner card and a remote. I got the MCE remote and a PVR500 for the job. All was fine and dandy until I found out that some obscure library for MythTV didn't work on my Athlon VIA motherboard chipset. A new motherboard meant new memory, and a new CPU. I also got a "HTPC" case so the thing didn't look ugly in the living room. So right off the bat my quest to do a homemade Tivo on the cheap without monthly fees set me back about $600 after throwing in a large hard drive, too. This didn't really bother me, though, as I figured it was part of doing business.

    I used Knoppmyth to set things up, and granted, it did go fairly smooth. The basic install goes along fine, it's the customization and other tweaks that take time and effort. I currently have it recording up to two shows at once, use it as a multimedia center so I can copy videos and MP3s to it and use it as a jukebox, and have used it to play emulated NES, SNES, and MAME games. But here are some things that I've noticed while using MythTV, in no particular order:

    I started off with a Ti4600 video card. It's fan started to die, so I spent money on an FX5200 card which I've read is recommended for MythTV. This went fine, and configured fine. But for some reason if I need to reset my MythTV box, the video settings revert back to a "generic" video card, and I have to recopy over the FX5200 settings from the Knoppmyth wiki. I have no idea why this is.

    Related to the above, when the generic video settings are on, recorded audio and video is out of sync. The video quality is noticeably bad, too. When it's configured correct, things are a lot better.

    I've played NES and MAME games on it. I've tried SNES, but can't get my Gravis controllers to work for some reason. Supposedly there's Genesis emulators out there, but I can't figure out how to use those within MythTV. I had issues setting up two controllers for the NES games, and they worked for awhile, but then I had some friends over and we were going to play and the 2nd controller didn't work anymore. I don't know why. Also, with the games, integrating the remote is supposed to be possible, but I don't know how to do it for my remote. It would be nice to be able to map certain keys to the remote to do emulator actions or to hit escape. Otherwise, I have to have a keyboard and mouse available when I'm using the emulators (currently via VNC). I don't have a wireless mouse/keyboard for the HTPC yet.

    After about a year, things started locking up, recordings were out of sync. Turns out MySQL defaults to logging every database action, and the database logs filled up my hard drive, killing MythTV. There was a fix in the forums, but it was a pain.

    I can only record basic cable. It can do digital, but it would have to hook up to my digital box and use IR forwarding to control the box. That would sort of defeat the purpose of being able to record a show and watch something else at the same time. Not to mention the whole reason I got it was so I could record *two* shows at the same time. I'd either need another digital box dedicated to the MythTV box, or some sort of CableCARD thing.

    Perhaps the coolest thing about MythTV is the commercial skip. After it records a show, it marks commercials, and pressing a certain button while watching them jumps to the next segment of the show. I've found this to be accurate about 50% of the time. Usually, it works for the first commercial break,

    1. Re:As a MythTV user... by airjrdn · · Score: 1, Informative

      Excellent info, thanks for posting it. From time to time I contemplate setting up a MythTV box, but end up not doing it for one reason or another. I'm currently on DirecTv running two hacked Tivos. For general media player functionality I use a modded XBox which I've found nothing can compete with. If you've never seen XBox Media Center, check it out, it's really slick, and plays pretty much every format out there.

    2. Re:As a MythTV user... by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Supposedly there's Genesis emulators out there, but I can't figure out how to use those within MythTV.
      # apt-get install dgen Then if you're on a recent version of Myth, set it up as the 'Odyssey2' program in Game Setup.
    3. Re:As a MythTV user... by jj00 · · Score: 1

      A great little read to remind me why I stopped using MythTV a couple months back. I ended up switching to MediaPortal. However, switching to another application has had its own drawbacks as well, some of them are the same. The software requires more power (CPU and RAM) to run efficiently, and there are definitely some quirks with it (plugins/emulators/etc).

      The ultimate reason I switched to MediaPortal was because most of the emulators I wanted to play with seemed to only run well on Windows. My other disclaimer is that I use my machine for archiving. I have a Directv Tivo that handles all the scheduling and recording, and if I want any of those shows I use the MediaPortal PC to record it. Works pretty well and I've found that it keeps me from archiving too much (laziness factor).

      By the way, I stopped using PC Gamepads (Gravis, etc). Instead I use a PS2 controller with a PS2-to-USB converter. The game system controllers are much better and well built. If you don't already have one you can probably find a used controller for one of the systems at the local Goodwill.

    4. Re:As a MythTV user... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Tivo's software will be available on that Comcast box for a small monthly fee, probably right around June. No need for a new box, and it will have features even the Series 3 won't have.

    5. Re:As a MythTV user... by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Haha, I've heard of that, but I'm not holding my breath. It may be available at some (most?) places in a few months, but my money's on it not being in this podunk hellhole of a bedroom community to two major cities in Michigan (I'm in the Battle Creek area) for a lot longer. We're just now getting On Demand...I've had to go through two STBs before I got the "current" channel guide, and to do that I needed to get the DVR in the first place. They originally gave me an HD STB with the "tan guide", and then a slightly updated "blue guide" or something. Talking to the techs, the tan guide boxes are common and everywhere in the area. Fuck, the damn things are running software from like the 80s, why are they still around? The national CSRs have no clue what's going on in this area. I want Verizon FiOS so bad.

      Yeah, I hate Comcast with a passion. :-) Oh yeah, another point popped into my head....all those recordings on the Comcast boxes, what do we get to do with them if we switch providers or get rid of Comcast!

    6. Re:As a MythTV user... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps the coolest thing about MythTV is the commercial skip. After it records a show, it marks commercials, and pressing a certain button while watching them jumps to the next segment of the show. I've found this to be accurate about 50% of the time. Usually, it works for the first commercial break, but falls apart after that, and I have to go back and just skip commercials in 30 second increments.


      Up until 2 years ago I had a RCA VCR that would auto skip commercials w/ 90%+ accuracy. I bought it ~1997 as was really sad when it broke.

    7. Re:As a MythTV user... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      So right off the bat my quest to do a homemade Tivo on the cheap without monthly fees set me back about $600 after throwing in a large hard drive, too.

      Would I do it again now? I don't know. TivoHD is too expensive.

      Well, I think the TivoS3 is now down to $599 at some outlets, and although there is a subscription it is under $12/mo in bulk, iirc. Not necessarily a bargain, but about what you'd pay to build your own. For me $12/mo is probably low enough to not have to fool with the box every couple of weeks.

      I'm hoping that either I get a computer based system that can jukbox my DVDs (about 250, but the Sony box is a PITA), and have CC2.0, or that Tivo gets a CC2.0, before DirecTV shuts off my HD DirectTivo box.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:As a MythTV user... by tsm1mt · · Score: 1

      I can only record basic cable. It can do digital, but it would have to hook up to my digital box and use IR forwarding to control the box. That would sort of defeat the purpose of being able to record a show and watch something else at the same time. Not to mention the whole reason I got it was so I could record *two* shows at the same time. I'd either need another digital box dedicated to the MythTV box, or some sort of CableCARD thing.


      I've been running Mythtv for several years now (I've lost count). I've used a PVR250 on a single Athlon 900 for most of that time, and it's been fine. I recently got a PVR150 working on a second box (been waiting for ivtv to work out the bugs, then waiting for me to find the time), so now I have dual tuners that'll record the "basic cable"

      I'm now wanting to take the next step, and move the Digital Cable box into the server closet and feed it directly into a tuner card (likely buy a PVR500 dual-tuner or the Linux HDTV card that'll do regular AND HD). Let Myth control the cable box.

      Yes, it means I won't be able to watch digital cable on the TV.

      Well. Sort-of.

      I finally added an Xbox with Myth to my home network. If I wanted to watch a "live" show off Digital Cable, I could just use the "liveTV" feature to pull the right Digital channel off of the Myth box.

      As a bonus, I could schedule Digital channels to be recorded (finally using all of the extra HBOs, Showtime, and Speedivision channels I pay for but almost never watch).

      Another bonus, I could watch one of those digital channels on any Xbox or Myth equipped TV in the house (or garage) or on my laptop. Today, I'm stuck with only the one TV with the digital tuner. Still stuck with only one live digital show at a time, but I rarely watch Live TV any more anyhow.
    9. Re:As a MythTV user... by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to maybe look at some other options like MediaPortal, though. I'm looking into building a media / Tivo-esque PC and I was wondering what these other options are. I was looking at MythTV but if other options present themselves as solid solutions, I would be interested in seeing what could work in it's place. Anyone have information on other options that I could perhaps research in my freetime?

      We've got digital TV with HD such that my goal would be to record two digital feeds and one HD feed with PC hardware and cable boxes.
    10. Re:As a MythTV user... by edmicman · · Score: 1

      I got started with a lot of good info at: http://forum.byopvr.com/dvr/index.php People answered my questions, and it had some decent starter tips. I mentioned MediaPortal as that was a new one that I hadn't heard about before; when I was doing my MythTV stuff I don't think it was as mature as it is now. Some others off the top of my head are GB-PVR, Freevo, BeyondTV (though I think this costs money). Good luck and have fun!

    11. Re:As a MythTV user... by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Nice to see such an informative HONEST posting. I'm stuck in pretty much the same boat as many - I want the flexability that my current hacked DTIVO offers me but for HD. Myth would be a godsend if it weren't for Cablecard and the monster PITA that Myth maintenance would be. If I use a cable DVR and it misses a show the woman is pissed at the cable company - if I built an awesome Myth box and it misses a show she screams at ME. I want an appliance for this not yet another machine to maintain. Apple's iTV was something I'd hoped would do this but nope, it's not better than my hacked XBOX. You want a good front end for downloaded torrents? Hack an XBOX and use XBMC - just don't try for full on 1080 HD.

      Anyway, you've pretty much confirmed what I feared about Myth. If goto it I'm going to be dealnig with all sorts of goofy little problems here and there that will add up to a screaming match with the woman. If someone simply BUILT a Myth box that did what I wanted and could handle the encrypted content I'm willing to pay my provider to send me I'd be all over it. Unfortunatly the greedy content providers would sue the pants off anyone who managed to build such a thing and so I'm stuck.... I wonder if the content providers understand just how much loathing and frustration they are developing among their customer base. I don't even think twice about using Torrent to get any show my current DTIVO is unable to record due to conflicts or forgetfulness. A shame I am going to have top dump it when I go HD. :-(

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  42. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

    What you should have replied with was pointing at the KPR Dragon 2.0, because that's basically a certified Tier 1 "It Just Works" system.

    The problem I personally have is that it's HDTV only... I need a system like KPR Dragon that's for SDTV. They say one's in the works, but not very soon.

    I would have thought the community would be working its ass off to find the cheapest possible off-the-shelf system that you could drop two Hauppauge 150s into, and boom, you're flying.

    Like, for instance, does Slashdot think this is a good off-the-shelf system for MythTV?

    Dell E521n with Athlon 64 3200+? $481 USD, before I add the two Hauppauge 150s, and plug in a 500GB USB drive...?

    According to this guy, it's not 100% effortless... But it sounds like it can be made to work.

    PLEASE, Slashdot, impress me by pointing me at the cheapest-possible off-the-shelf that will Just Work!

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  43. Re:TiVo wins of course... by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

    Funny, but reality is a bit different. I have a Myth box that the only time I have to reboot it is when I throw a kernel patch on. Right now, it's uptime is 45 days. The last big outage it had was upgrading from FC4 to Ubuntu, and that was only about 6 hours. Granted I'm a professional sysadmin by day, but there's a lot to be said for following instructions.

    --
    Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
  44. GB-PVR by rowle1jt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone ever check out GB-PVR?

    I run it home on top of XP Pro SP2, I only have the software installed thats needed for the PVR function, no Office or anything like that. Makes the machine very stable! Multiple tuner support, web based programming.. its got all the bells and whistles of Myth. The nice part is, EVERYTHING that needs to be done on the PVR side of things can be done from the remote! There is a very active forum/developer community and sub, the owner/programmer is on there posting and helping people daily.

    http://www.gbpvr.com/

    http://www.gbpvr.com/pmwiki/

    http://forums.gbpvr.com/

    1. Re:GB-PVR by io-waiter · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have been bought by welltonway wich is a led by less than trustworthy people.

      So expect the worst.

      Wellton way went chapter 11 and is now reconstructed and is trying to rake in cash in doubtful ways, consumer authorities in Sweden have issued warnings. Welltons earlier companies include Lappower which went down, bad.
      My guess is that they will destroy GB PVR =(

    2. Re:GB-PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That happened about two years ago, but I havnt seen any negative affects yet. Its a great app.

    3. Re:GB-PVR by rowle1jt · · Score: 0

      Yeah, at this point it is only getting better! Doing a search on Welton Way didn't bring much up. Perhaps I am not search on the right terms?

  45. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Sketch · · Score: 1

    Just make sure all of your Myth boxes are running Fedora/atrpms. The atrpms Myth packages are not standard mythtv-0.20 packages, they are patched with some changes from CVS which make them incompatible with boxes running standard 0.20. Also, I tried CVS Myth on my non-Fedora box, and it was newer than what's in the atrpms packages, so it wasn't compatible eitehr.

    On the Tivo vs MythTV debate: The time on my MythTV box is correct, but the time on my S1 Tivo is off by an hour for the next 3 weeks and TIvo feels it isn't important enough to fix anymore.

    --
    -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
  46. Re:TiVo wins of course... by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

    Yeah... The third MythTV commandment is "Thou shalt not mount NFS over wireless". Pretty good idea even for non-mythtv setups.

    --
    Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
  47. gb-pvr anyone? by daskrabs · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know it's Windows-based, but gb-pvr is the best free pvr solution out there, IMHO. I tried myth-tv/knoppmyth first. For an intermediate Linux user like me, setup and configuration was a nightmare, even with recommended hardware (read: hauppauge/nvidia). gb is EASY to configure, and it only consumes slightly more resources than myth. It's way easier to use, supports all the hardware that myth does, and it has available many of the nice plugins that myth has. I've been using it for a month, and I'll never watch TV without gb again.

  48. Re:TiVo wins of course... by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

    Umm.. I think the Ubuntu install is as complicated as:

    sudo apt-get install mythtv mythvideo mythmusic mythtv-themes

    Took about 10 minutes.

    Yeah, yeah, I know.. It's a LITTLE more complicated than that, but copy and pasting commands from a HOWTO isn't really that complicated is it?

    --
    Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
  49. mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  50. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    From the article, about the User Interface:

    Really, the category is almost too tight to call. While MythTV has some better UI choices and abilities, TiVo's standard interface is more simple to setup (turn on the box) and more people are use to it .
    Read: "more people have used it and learned it"

    If that isn't the worst reason to rate something better than it obviously is from their own tests, I don't know what would be.
    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  51. Knoppmyth Makes Things Easier by MrMunkey · · Score: 1

    Okay, I know that I'm a lot more technical than the general masses out there, but it took me all of 10 - 15 minutes to get Knoppmyth set up and working. I had a spare computer lying around, so I bought a Hauppauge PVR 350. I did have to tweak the sound a bit to get it to work right away after booting, and I did have some bad memory that I replaced (lock ups were not fun).

    I enjoy being able to log my server usage with MRTG though. I'd like to see if Tivo can set up SNMP traps.

    I will say that at the moment, Tivo is going to be a lot easier for the "moms and grandmas" out there to set up. Heck, they'd probably still need someone to set that up. There are pre-installed MythTV solutions though. http://mythic.tv/product_info.php?products_id=44 Is one such product. It's definitely more than Tivo, but at the moment there's no need for a monthly fee.

    So, Tivo is currently more user friendly to set up. That could change if more people start offering comparable MythTV setups at comparable prices though.

    1. Re:Knoppmyth Makes Things Easier by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Tivo is like a Windows PC. It's something that looks like it should be easy but once you actually see one of these computer illiterate grannies use it you realize that it is not all that it's cracked up to be. For a consumer like that, granny shouldn't even see the interface. It should be strictly "suggestions" driven based on tracking what the end user is watching.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Knoppmyth Makes Things Easier by smchris · · Score: 1

      Probably luck of the draw with your hardware. I went from _trying_ KnoppMyth to successfully following the online instructions for installing Fedora and the Myth rpm packages. Burned me up a bit too because my other machines are all Debian after transitioning from years with Red Hat/Fedora.

      I'm happy but I don't particularly see MythTV as the economy route considering you really should dedicate some half-decent hardware to it. Perhaps more potential branded as an all-in-one Swiss Army Knife of media.

  52. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARRRRGGG ffs just use a soft mount

  53. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen to that.

    My mythtv setup (5x tuners) gets rebooted for 2 reasons:
    Power outages & hardware upgrades.

    Linux sysadmin by day, but you're right, RTFM helps
    a great deal.

  54. Neither. It's MediaPortal versus Vista MCE by charnov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Frankly, MediaPortal and the new Vista MCE are heads and shoulders about the rest and have the added benefit of being able to use Windows drivers which means everything on the planet is and will be supported.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
    1. Re:Neither. It's MediaPortal versus Vista MCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree, I tried MythTV and Media Portal and I must say that Media Portal is MUCH easier to get going and it supports almost every configuration one can imagine.
      Media portal has a server/client based configuration in beta that is going to blow away the competition and also has a TON of plugins that are actually easy to use and configure.
      Sure MythTV runs on Linux....big deal.. I think it's ugly, limited and a hassle to configure.

  55. Re:TiVo wins of course... by stang · · Score: 3, Informative

    To be fair, I've never used a Tivo

    Lemme help, then.

    won't allow you to short your shows by TV show

    Tivo does. Sort by show or date/time recorded. Also groups related shows together into a folder (e.g., "Doctor Who - 5 episodes"). Series 3 also puts all HD shows in another folder.

    I also have a 400 GB RAID for storage

    Tivo doesn't offer RAID. It's pretty easy to stick a second (or replace your original with a larger) drive. Series 2 (non-HD) does allow transfers back and forth from your computer, so you can store 'em on your own RAID, tape backup, DVD-ROM, or what have you. Series 3 doesn't have this; it appears to be a legal issue getting worked out with Cable Labs. You'll probably see the same thing on any new device with a CableCard in it.

    MythTV also has a nice web interface

    Tivo's got one, too.

    My MythTV box has been up for a solid month without any problems

    My Tivo's uptime is measured in months/years. It reboots itself when new updates are available. It does this at 2:00 AM and hasn't missed a show yet. In the 7 years that I've had a Tivo (Series 1/2/3), I've forced a reboot *once*.

    Tivo is an incredibly easy to use, rock solid (hey, it's running Linux) unit. Look, if you're happy tinkering with the thing, more power to ya. As for me, I turn the TV on when I'm done working, the kids are in bed, and I'm looking to unwind. I've got enough between work and my own side projects--I don't need to be messing with the TV, too.

    One other point (and you may have had a solid Myth system for long enough to see this): When you get a device like a Tivo that is stable, simple to use, and works every time, things change. It becomes a new tool that transforms how you do things. I can't imagine watching TV without Tivo--it's that different (and that much better) than plain-old service. I skip commercials (but fast-forward through them so I can catch new show announcements or the occasional ad that is amusing the first time you see it). I watch shows on "Tivo time," skipping through the boring parts. I fast forward to the end of the remodeling show so I can see the results without all the witty banter. I check out old shows I haven't seen in years because Tivo had space and nothing better to do than record it. I don't worry about when seasonal shows are on (like the Peanuts ones)--Tivo catches them for me.

    If you like watching TV, and you don't have this kind of experience, you should get a Tivo.

    --
    "200 Quatloos on the newcomer!" "300 Quatloos against!"
  56. Did you try by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    ~# /etc/init.d/nfs restart

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
  57. Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by NickCatal · · Score: 1

    At my parent's house they just use Time Warner's HD Cable Box. Has a good 160GB of storage, interface is fine, and the monthly price is comparable to TiVO. No need for cablecard/ir-blaster/etc and there are 2 tuners and on demand video (although they never use it)

    --
    -nick
    1. Re:Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Because you have no control over the content you record. And they're friggin' buggy. Oh, and they're inflexible. And you can't expand or upgrade them (my Myth box has 2 tuners and 250GB... but eventually, I plan to have 3 tuners and >TB. Good luck getting that on a TW DVR).

      Besides, can you listen to your digital music collection with your TW box? Or web radio? Can you watch your ripped DVD collection? Or downloaded video?

      And then there's the more esoteric. Can you get RSS feeds, or the news, or weather on those boxes? Can you play games on them?

    2. Re:Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by demon · · Score: 1

      The HD TiVo has no IR blaster. There aren't a bunch of cables connecting to your cableco box. None of that. You connect it to cable in, install the CableCards, and start watching and recording TV. The Series3 also has two tuners (along with a built-in ATSC tuner, to suck in OTA HD content as well), and a 250 GB drive (people have replaced the built-in drive with up to 750 GB drives, and the eSATA port will provide for even more expandability).

      Also, wait a few weeks with your TW HD DVR. I've heard of a saddening number of cases where people got them, only to report "It worked fine for a while, then it stopped; I have no idea why, it just broke. I'm now on my {third,fourth,fifth} unit - all the cable company can do is keep replacing them, they don't have any idea what's wrong". Go look around, you'll find a lot of this.

      I've heard of the following issues, just as a sampling:

        - SA DVR gets slower and slower
        - SA DVR crashes upon conflicting scheduled recordings, and just forgets recordings at random afterward
        - SA DVR has frequent partial recordings, or will record no instance of a show, even though it claims to be programmed to record multiple copies
        - SA DVR won't play recorded show at all - rebooting usually fixes this, but not always
        - SA DVR search interface is terrible - can only search by first letter (and in some versions of SARA, only the *current day* - rather defeats the purpose of "searching)

      There are others, but that's just what I can think of off the top of my head.

      The Scientific Atlanta DVRs have gotten a *terrible* rap, and for good reason. Oh yes, and apparently TW will be replacing the Passport and SARA DVR software with something of their own devising, which is, by all reports, far worse than both Passport and SARA.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    3. Re:Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by NickCatal · · Score: 1

      Yeah...

      but they aren't $800 upfront and $16/month (I think we pay $16/month for box rental and DVR service together)

      I can forgo scheduling online... and the passport system isn't that bad... getting replacement boxes is easy around here (had to trade one in a month ago for crappy encoding quality with too many MPEG artifacts, but that was after having it for a year and a half (or more.))

      If I want to watch stuff from my computer on my TV, I'll just hook my computer up to the damn TV. Or use this nice 20.1" LCD I bought that plays downloaded stuff just fine..

      It has optical out and there are those music channels. I don't use my TV for music anyways.

      And I can live without RSS feeds, and having to tune to the weather channel and waiting a few minutes to see the local weather scroll along the bottom of the screen.

      I see no reason why someone would need to buy a Tivo or build a MythTV for basic home usage. Not saying I don't want a Series 3, I do, but for around here... worthless.

      --
      -nick
    4. Re:Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by demon · · Score: 1

      Having to lose my recorded shows every couple months because my cheapo DVR keeps crapping itself would drive me up a wall in a hurry. So would constantly having half-recorded (or unrecorded) shows because my DVR decided it was unhappy that day. Or not being able to watch a show that it says it recorded. I'd want to take it to the office, go on the roof, and throw it onto the sidewalk below.

      Maybe if you use the DVR very little, you won't notice, or it won't bother you. I'll admit the TiVo Series3 ain't cheap - far, far from it. But I can't say I'm even a little bit sorry I bought it - every day I'm happy because of how nicely the TiVo works. It's really very slick. There's always some little thing that makes me feel better about it - whether it's the TiVo recording other shows I like, or the new Unbox on TiVo for downloading movies (eat it, TW), or the satisfying "bloop" when I push a button.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    5. Re:Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by NickCatal · · Score: 1

      I use it quite a bit. Like I said, I replaced it once after two years. A lot of people replace their Tivo Hard Drives more often than that (and I got a newer revision of the model I asked for.) It isn't like I am saving the entire Heroes series forever.

      If I could I would get a Series 3. Tivo has by far the best interface and features of all the DVR options (in my own personal opinion) but I would rather stick to something that can play back my XVid downloads and more (which is a media center comp with cable cards, even if it has to be based on vista.)

      And if I want to download movies/tv shows, Apple TVs are $300. And I'm sure somebody will figure out how to put Linux on that soon enough and there will be xvid support.

      --
      -nick
    6. Re:Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Why not just use the cable company's DVR? At my parent's house they just use Time Warner's HD Cable Box. Has a good 160GB of storage, interface is fine, and the monthly price is comparable to TiVO. No need for cablecard/ir-blaster/etc and there are 2 tuners and on demand video (although they never use it)

      There are two main reasons not to use a cable company DVR. First, they have the minimum feature set possible where that feature set is a conflict between what the user wants and what the cable company wants. Second, for strategic reasons if the cable companies are the ones providing the DVRs then the feature set will always be limited and it is just extending those company's regional monopolies and holding back progress.

      Let me speak to the first point first. How easy is it to skip commercials on said DVR? How easy is it to burn a show to DVD, or better yet edit out the commercials then burn to DVD? Do any of the shows ever expire or refuse to record? Do you have to pay a monthly fee for use? Can you pick a different program subscription if you don't like the descriptions/accuracy of the one they provide? Can you save a show to an mpeg and easily copy it to your laptop for viewing on the plane when you don't have internet access and don't want to run down the battery using the DVD drive? Can you watch IPTV content like iTunes and YouTube?

      Now, assuming you're supporting the cable comapny's bid to take over the DVR market think about the following questions. Has the cable company raised everyone's rates for cable and started overcharging in order to make the DVR seem cheaper than the competition? If they haven't why shouldn't they once most of the other DVR manufacturers go out of business? Do you think the cable company wants you to be able to skip commercials and will make that easier for you in future? Will the cable company ever support arbitrary content from TCP/IP knowing in undercuts their lock-in? Will the cable companies ever make archiving shows to DVD easy or would they rather you pay them per viewing for old shows you already paid for once? If at some point the program guide becomes inaccurate, can you switch to another service, or can you right now switch to a free service?

    7. Re:Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Yeah... but they aren't $800 upfront and $16/month (I think we pay $16/month for box rental and DVR service together)

      How much are they really though? The cable company wants $58 a month from me for cable Internet or $50 a month for Cable internet and basic cable television. From this, I conclude that cable television actually costs them negative amounts of money.

      The reality of the situation is that the cable TV companies have mostly raised cable rates higher and are using some of that money to subsidize their DVR rental business so which part of your bill it is listed under does not really matter. Technically, this is probably illegal, but realistically it is almost impossible to prove and no one has the cash to fight it out in court. As an end result, if you use the cable company DVR you're in effect being subsidized by everyone else who does not but who pays the higher rates anyway. So it is in your immediate financial interest to use the cable company supplied DVR. Of course it also means you're helping them to illegally destroy the DVR industry and dooming yourself to crappy feature set, lack of innovation, and exorbitant prices in the long run. The DVR of the future will be like the rental telephones available during Ma Bell's hay-day. I hope you enjoy paying every time you watch an episode of something, being unable to exercise your fair use rights to actually save a copy of the show you are watching, and being limited to the same set of really basic features forever.

    8. Re:Why not just use the cable company's DVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's why: my cable company provides the worst piles of shit for cable boxes. I have talked to a few people with the Motorola boxes running "iGuide" and they all agree. Here is a sampling of the problems:

      1. The box freezes more than any windows box I've used.
      2. The guide data is wrong more frequently than my soon-to-be-upgraded myth box.
      3. There is a paltry 10-20hrs of recording space.
      4. The remote for it works 40% of the time.
      5. The fast-forward levels are whack. 2x is way too slow and 3x is way too fast.
      6. The interface is stupid. When turning off the DVR during a recording, it asks if I want to switch tuners. WTF do I need to switch tuners?
      7. When changing channels from one that is being recorded to another, it asks if I want to swap tuners. Choosing yes leaves live tv on the same tuner as before, but swaps the recording program, which creates two partial entries in the recorded programs menu. Choosing no leaves the channels alone.
      8. The EPG has banner ads on it. WTF? I *PAID* for the DVR service! Why do they feed me ads?
      9. There is no option to letterbox HD content over component video to my roommates decent, but 4:3 "hdtv".
      10. I can't for the life of me figure out how to not record duplicate episodes of shows. 10-20hrs is small enough without dupes!
      11. Other little miscellaneous navigation issues that pale in comparison to the above 10

      THAT is why I want my own, homemade DVR. Thankfully the Motorola POS has supported firewire from mythtv.

  58. Depends on your needs/wants by hawg2k · · Score: 1

    Both are great. I've used Mythtv now for about 3 years. However, whenever someone comes and asks me about using Mythtv, I always ask them "what do you want to do with it?" Basically, if you don't plan on keeping what you record permanently (where pre re-encoding commercial flagging comes in nice), and you don't plan on watching downloaded/otherwise created elsewhere video conenct, then I recommend just geting a tivo. Mythtv can be a lot of work to set up, and as others have mentioned, depending on your setup you'll be plagued with problems permanently.

    Commercial flagging is nice, but reporogramming the tivo remote to do 30 second forwrad jumps is trivial and taking 8 seconds to get through 6 minutes of commercials plenty good enough. If you don't want all the quasi legal features of Mythtv, then there's no point in messing with it ... unless messing with it is the point.

  59. Re:TiVo wins of course... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    Everything is easier when you skip steps.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  60. VDR by GoatVomit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm quite surprised that they used mythtv or is vdr too german? Here in Finland the popularity is reversed to say the least and getting softcam to work with some cheap smartcard readers wasn't that big of a hassle. Recording porn err documentaries has never been this easy.

  61. Every time I think of taking the plunge and do it by zuki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Rigt before going to spec out a nice bunch of PC components on NewEgg and build a good box, I always pass by the Myth TV Users Mailing List to make sure that I get the most relevant and updated hardware necessary, and instead end up reading a sampling of the horror stories they go through, taking a few minutes to savor the different tortures one can be subjected to (video out of sync with audio, artifacts on certain channels, MySQL database corruption, NuvExport screws up, X breaks dependencies, and all the rest) and decide to wait another few weeks, certainly the new upcoming release will be much more reliable and user-friendly? And by the way, what happened to all of the things that were done during last year's Google's 'Summer Of Code' for Myth TV ? All the great features and enhancements that were worked on?

    So I keep waiting, hoping that the next time I check the mailing list, their version of Matt Groening's Life In Hell have died down a bit....

    Even though I am definitely doing a fair amount of Sys Admin duties on various distros, this is different, the killer part is what will happen when something screws up while I'm not around, and my wife gets mad because something didn't work, (provided I can even teach her to deal with all of these menus, options and the whole 'watching Live TV through Myth' syndrome) or my kid decides that he knows better and starts trying to hack the box himself in frustration....?

    Surely the TiVo is an attractive box for the wife and kids, but with technology changing as rapidly as it has been, it is questionable whether to invest in such a product today, unless we were hard-core TV addicts, and could justify the cost as it would immediately be recouped.

    Funnily enough, the most expedient thing I've ended up doing has been to identify the things I want to watch, and as a previous poster pointed out, just BitTorrent the shows in HD without commercials the next day, no matter where in the world I may be. (...and yes, it is sweet to download things at 10 Megs speed while in certain countries like Japan or Norway!!...LOL!)

    Net result: I hardly EVER watch any TV whatsoever, and the few shows I care about can be watched on my laptop.

    Well, I wish I had more time to tinker.... and still, major kudos to Jarod Wilson for having created this amazing open-source wonder. But as others have pointed out, for either of these two options, it's really going to all be about being able to have Myth TV interact with the CableCard slot, at least in major urban centers where cable companies rule the roost, and antenna reception is unwatchable!! The killer is that companies like Time Warner Cable are offering their own PVR deals, so they will make sure to lock anyone else out of the convenience until forced to do so by the FCC... Or that someone learns to hack the Firewire outputs of some of those new set-top decoders. Then you potentially still have HDCP to contend with. Oh, brother!! Brave new world !!

    Z.

  62. Re:TiVo wins of course... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Buy something already built. Try a monolith and report back to the rest of us.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  63. Re:TiVo wins of course... by QuesarVII · · Score: 1

    Use automount. It will perform the nfs mount when it's accessed, and unmount it when idle. Problem solved.

  64. Worst review ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope that at least he earned something from the ads. That review is the biggest piece of fluff and empty rhetoric that it is less than useful for wiping your ass with.

  65. MythTV can handle HDTV/encrypted content in Europe by vanDrunen · · Score: 2, Informative

    This comparison would be completely different in Europe! In europe nearly every digital TV channel broadcasted over Cable, OTA or Sattelite is encrypted with one of many encryption standards (Conax, Irdeto, SECA, etc.).

    Instead of a "CableCARD", which is used for viewing encrypted content in the US, a "Conditional Access Module" (CAM) is used in Europe, Africa and most Asian countries for all digital broadcast methods (DVB-C, -S and -T). Most TV companies supply set-top boxes with a built-in decoder and a smart-card, but the smart-card can also be used in other receivers or in a PC when you have the right CAM.
    There are a lot of TV cards that can use CAM's and are very well supported by MythTV, for instance: http://http//knc1.com/gb.htm/.
    Receiving HDTV or Encrypted content with MythTV is no problem in Europe at least.

    The TiVo doesn't seem to exist in Europe, so I wouldn't be able to compare it to TiVo myself, since I never saw one. A very popular digital TV receiver / DVR in Europe is the Dreambox: http://www.dream-multimedia-tv.de/.
    The Dreambox is an open platform, is linux-powered and doesn't have any "problems" with DRM or whatsoever. The only limitation the Dreambox and other set-top boxes have is a lack of raw computing power and that's why I prefer to have all my home entertainment on a HTPC.
    And that's where the Windows (MCE) vs. Linux discussion comes back!

  66. Re:TiVo wins of course... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    There's no need. Just setup human readable names for your recordings and an smb share.

    That's one of the nice things about an open PVR. Want "Tivo to Go" features? Just use the file mangler of your choice and deposit the video on the storage medium of your choice. Same goes for getting stuff into the system.

    It's just a file. Treat it as such. No special apps required.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. Missing option by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0
    Cable Co. DVR + modded xbox.

    The cable co. box just works. It has two tuners for HDTV, and can store a fair amount of content. For everything else, you have the modded xbox. It can play fairly high quality video (granted, no true HD) from any torrent, and is already in a nice little box. And is is great for NES / SNES / Mame emulation. Anyone else have this setup?

  69. Re:TiVo wins of course... by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

    Maybe this weekend I'll stop overclocking this AMD K6 I found in a dumpster over the holidays. I know, I know, but it didn't cost me a dime!

    If you actually spend money you can have a nice system. I built mine for around $1,000. I haven't read about the new Tivo yet, but does it let you skip commercials while you compress to xvid or x264 to take up less space?

    Can it transcode into an iPod format and host a podcast on a webserver that iTunes can connect to?
  70. Tivo? Who Cares? by guinsu · · Score: 1

    Tivo seems a bit dated and irrelevant here. How does Myth compare to the Motorola Dual Tuner HD Box that Comcast and Verizon Fios use? I would imagine more people in the USA who are recording HD content use this box from the cable company. Isn't Tivo HD mostly for satellite?

    Anyway, I'd love to switch away from the quirky motorola box, it's got way to many bugs and is very first generation. Can MythTV do anything for me here?

  71. MythTV wins. by russotto · · Score: 1

    For the non-premium-channel watching geek.

    1) No subscription fee
    2) Commercial Flagging
    3) No ads, auto-recorded shows, or other similar nonsense.

    On the down side, it WAS a pain in the ass to set up. And not cheap; I think I spent $800+ on my box (HTPC case, 1G memory, two HD tuner cards, etc).

    As for CableCard, I'm considering dropping cable entirely. All the shows I watch are on over-the-air TV, and I've now got working antenna set up.

  72. You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know you're wrong because I tried to do exactly this before I went and bought a Series 3 Tivo. The only way to have a DVR for encrypted HD is to get a Tivo or a POS cableco DVR. Your setup (unless you have some magical HD capture card that nobody makes) can only record encrypted HD content that has been downconverted to SD, and even if you did have HD capture, it would be re-encoded.

    Oh, and put a watt-meter on your cable box+MythTV combo. I'll bet you spend more on additional electricity than you would on the monthly Tivo service fee.

    1. Re:You're lying. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, and put a watt-meter on your cable box+MythTV combo. I'll bet you spend more on additional electricity than you would on the monthly Tivo service fee.

      Ha ha, yeah, if you think Myth users selected it as an option because it's cheaper, you're seriously misguided. I know I selected Myth because it's more flexible, powerful, and featureful than any commercial DVR I could buy (I don't have an HDTV at this point, so downconverted HD would be just fine for me).

    2. Re:You're lying. by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      I know I selected Myth because it's more flexible, powerful, and featureful
      I don't understand how this jibes with the fact that it can only record a subset of what the Tivo can (i.e. encrypted hd signals). You can't really call it more "flexible" when it simply cannot record from some sources that the Tivo or other STBs can. In reality, the MythTV has an overlapping set of features. I do wish the MythTV was allowed to play ball and get the encrypted channels. But I just don't see it happening anytime soon. Until then, I have to agree with others and say MythTV will only be appropriate for a small subset of people (even ignoring the price and technical aspects).
    3. Re:You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      If you don't care about HD, the parent has a point. MythTV can record whatever you want as long as you don't mind it being in SD. It also has other nice features like MythDVD, and MAME integration, etc...

      Once you want HD though, MythTV becomes almost useless.

    4. Re:You're lying. by jotok · · Score: 1

      One word: Firewire.

      Ok, some more words. Just because you gave up doesn't mean it doesn't work!
      And it never occurred to me to determine how much power my setup was using--although, my monthly electric bill for my house is around the cost of TiVo subscription, so I'm not sure you're correct.

    5. Re:You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 1
      Sorry.... Encrypted content isn't transmitted over the firewire interface. Either you don't have it working, or you got a lucky buggy cable box. (Or maybe you don't have any encrypted channels).

      I didn't give up because I couldn't figure it out. I gave up because it's provably impossible without a hacked cable box that I wasn't willing to buy. Sure, you can record whatever content is available over firewire, but at least where I live, that is exactly the same content that I could get with an antenna.

      And it never occurred to me to determine how much power my setup was using--although, my monthly electric bill for my house is around the cost of TiVo subscription, so I'm not sure you're correct.


      Holy crap! How much is your electricity? Around here it's $0.22/kwH.. My monthly electric bill is 10x the cost of a Tivo subscription, and that's after replacing practically everything (except the stove/oven which is inefficient by definition) with the latest energy efficient stuff!
    6. Re:You're lying. by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! How much is your electricity? Around here it's $0.22/kwH.. My monthly electric bill is 10x the cost of a Tivo subscription, and that's after replacing practically everything (except the stove/oven which is inefficient by definition) with the latest energy efficient stuff! Might I offer the following suggestion... Replace the Stove/oven with GAS. Your laws of conservation eats energy just converting the gas->electric->Stove/Heat and you loose money. Save a little money and convert any heat producing items directly to gas to skip the middle conversion step. (Water Heater - Gas, Stove - Gas, Dryer - Gas) I guess a few exceptions to this would exist... I don't know of any Gas Toasters yet. :) Of Course, with the Water Heater, it begs the whole tank vs. no tank argument... I'm torn:I have one friend that is thinking of going tankless and it sounds great.. another friend works on boilers, etc.. and said that the amount of heat to bring a tank @ Temp and maintain it, is less than needed when flash heating the water. (Really high temps needed to do the instant heat trick...) -- So I'm just stuck with my tank until it dies I guess and then hopefully cheap hydrogen will be out. :)

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    7. Re:You're lying. by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      Damn HTML Formatted button... Sorry, that looks crappy. Should be this:

      Holy crap! How much is your electricity? Around here it's $0.22/kwH.. My monthly electric bill is 10x the cost of a Tivo subscription, and that's after replacing practically everything (except the stove/oven which is inefficient by definition) with the latest energy efficient stuff!

      Might I offer the following suggestion... Replace the Stove/oven with GAS.

      Your laws of conservation eats energy just converting the gas->electric->Stove/Heat and you loose money. Save a little money and convert any heat producing items directly to gas to skip the middle conversion step. (Water Heater - Gas, Stove - Gas, Dryer - Gas) I guess a few exceptions to this would exist... I don't know of any Gas Toasters yet. :)

      Of Course, with the Water Heater, it begs the whole tank vs. no tank argument... I'm torn:
      I have one friend that is thinking of going tankless and it sounds great.. another friend works on boilers, etc.. and said that the amount of heat to bring a tank @ Temp and maintain it, is less than needed when flash heating the water. (Really high temps needed to do the instant heat trick...) -- So I'm just stuck with my tank until it dies I guess and then hopefully cheap hydrogen will be out. :)

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    8. Re:You're lying. by jotok · · Score: 1

      So far, the only HD content I have pulled off the box are a couple episodes of Firefly--so I suppose that's not encrypted. We get HBO and Skinemax and ESPN in HD here, but I rarely even watch them, much less record them to play back later.

      And, actually, I misspoke--I'm paying about $60/month for electricity. Most of my appliances (including the washer and dryer and the fridge) run off gas, I use high-efficiency bulbs, all that jazz. I don't think a huge chunk of that is from my Myth box, tho, as I have two roommates.

      Power issues aside, I don't want you to think that I'm blindly supporting Myth over every other solution. My cable provider has given me an HD-DVR which I suspect is a rebranded TiVo and I'll probably dump the Myth solution in favor of it simply because I'm losing interest in playing with the product. Then again, I am considering building and selling Myth-based DVRs--the issue is making them feature-rich enough to justify the price tag, which so far I cannot get below $400, and finding a niche market that won't simply get the same COTS solution everyone else is using.

    9. Re:You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      There aren't any gas toasters because they wouldn't work very well. Burning natural gas produces CO2 and water vapor. You'd have soggy toast unless the flame was above the bread, and then you'd have to flip the toast... For a demonstration, put a pot of cold water on the stove and turn on the gas. You'll see the condensation from the exhaust products form on the outside of the pot.

      I probably should get a gas dryer, but in the summer you can go one better and use a clothes line. I'm planning on getting an induction stove (more efficient than gas even, because much less heat is lost to the air) as soon as I can afford one.

      Unless they're lying about the efficiency ratings, tankless models can be significantly more efficient than water heaters with a tank. I'm upgrading to a tankless water heater in a few months, but the old one is gas already, and isn't contributing to my electric bill.

    10. Re:You're lying. by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and put a watt-meter on your cable box+MythTV combo. I'll bet you spend more on additional electricity than you would on the monthly Tivo service fee.


      Are you claiming the TiVo itself does not use any electricity? I'll wager (Tivo Electricity + Monthly Fee) > MythTV Electricity.
      --

      Enigma

    11. Re:You're lying. by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what's so funny. People keep telling the GP that MythTV isn't useless, if only he wanted to use it for something else.

    12. Re:You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      MythTV Electricity + Cable box electricity.

      The Tivo electricity usage is on par with the cable box alone. A general purpose computer transcoding video 24/7 is significantly more power hungry than a device that writes bits from the network to disk.

      My series 3 Tivo draws about 30 watts. My MythTV box running SD content used 90 watts. If you increase the CPU utilization by 4x, what do you think will happen?

    13. Re:You're lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "jives with" not "jibes with"

    14. Re:You're lying. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "A general purpose computer transcoding video 24/7" ...which is what a Tivo is, unless you're talking about the DirecTivo (which writes the compressed satellite bitstream to the drive).

      Tivo transcodes video on the fly.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    15. Re:You're lying. by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1
      MM interesting about the gas toaster. I used to have a gas cooker, that had a small gas grill ideal for toasting:

      Instant Heat

      and the bread toasted in about 20 seconds. Faster than an electric toaster. OK you need to turn it, but that's no big deal.

    16. Re:You're lying. by Darby · · Score: 1


      I know you're wrong because I tried to do exactly this before I went and bought a Series 3 Tivo. The only way to have a DVR for encrypted HD is to get a Tivo or a POS cableco DVR. Your setup (unless you have some magical HD capture card that nobody makes) can only record encrypted HD content that has been downconverted to SD, and even if you did have HD capture, it would be re-encoded.


      OK, here's where I don't understand all the issues apparently.
      Say you have an HD cable box, a MythTV with an HD capture card, and an IR blaster going to the cable box.
      What are you missing out on in this situation?
      You're getting HD shows, the cable box decrypts them and then you record them.
      Where is the problem here?

    17. Re:You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Series 3 Tivo does not transcode digital broadcasts.

      Also, when it does transcode it does not use a general purpose processor, but instead a more efficient (for the task) programmable DSP.

    18. Re:You're lying. by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      jibe3 /dab/
      -verb (used without object), jibed, jibing.
      to be in harmony or accord; agree: The report does not quite jibe with the commissioner's observations.
      [Origin: 1805-15, Americanism; orig. uncert.]

      --Synonyms conform, accord, fit.
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=jibe&x=0& y=0

      First rule of being a spelling/grammar nazi - ALWAYS look it up before you correct someone.

      (Let the Fight Club jokes begin.)

    19. Re:You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You're missing the HD capture card.

      Seriously, go try to find one that a normal human can afford. There are professional models that are meant for video editing consoles and cost thousands of dollars, but a consumer affordable analog HD capture card just doesn't exist. You can get digital capture either via ATSC, firewire, or unencrypted QAM (or DVB if you live in Europe), but for analog HD or encrypted digital (the bulk of non-broadcast content) you're just out of luck.

    20. Re:You're lying. by Darby · · Score: 1

      You're missing the HD capture card.

      Seriously, go try to find one that a normal human can afford.


      Here you go, $129

      That was easy enough and even native Linux drivers.

    21. Re:You're lying. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I guess that makes sense, with the cable card.

      I stand corrected.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    22. Re:You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      That is exactly what I said it is. It can capture non-encrypted, digital HD video, and SD analog content. It cannot capture analog HD video. It cannot capture HD content from digital cable if it is encrypted (for practically everybody, anything that isn't also available with an antenna is encrypted). It is an ATSC/NTSC + DVB + Unencrypted QAM capture card. Exactly what I was referring to in my post, and pretty much completely useless if you want to have a DVR that can record cable-only HD content. You can also capture via firewire, and you can get a card for that for $10, but it doesn't help you capture encrypted HD content.

      Did you even bother to read that page?

    23. Re:You're lying. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      You mean like watching TV? Clearly it's not "completely irrelevant", and I'd hardly call watching SD or downconverted HD (not to mention the million other things Myth can do) insufficient for "a more-than-minimally-functional system".

    24. Re:You're lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can build an energy efficient myth box, I did. And for that extra juice, I can pop in a $10 telephony card and also use it as a home office asterisk system (ippbx), I can add CC camera to see who's at my front door, and watch it on my tv,.... I can extend it any way I want to, try that with tivo. And, when obstacles are thrown my way, I'll just wait for a slashdotter workaround.

      For me, myth. For my mom, tivo.

    25. Re:You're lying. by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's amazing how intellectually dishonest people are being in this thread. The original poster said it was useless to HIM because HE wanted to record encrypted HD shows (that's what the whole CableCard thing was talking about). Since MythTV can't do that, he has to get ANOTHER STB. Once he's bought the other STB, there's absolutely no reason to fork out the money and spend all the time on making MythTV work. That makes it completely irrelevant for the poster.

      If you were looking for a toaster and I recommended a microwave, don't you think you would be justified in telling me a microwave is completely irrelevant in this instance? Wouldn't you be a bit puzzled when I went on and on about the number of amazing and useful things you could do with a microwave, even though it can't toast bread?

    26. Re:You're lying. by Darby · · Score: 1


      Did you even bother to read that page?


      Well, like I said, I don't really understand much about any of that so reading the description and translating it into what you're talking about isn't trivial given that.

      As far as encrypted, isn't that the point of the cable box? So AFAIK (which as we now both know isn't too far at all) encrypted signals don't even enter into the equation assuming you have a cable box and an IR blaster to handle it. Is that incorrect?

      It can capture non-encrypted, digital HD video, and SD analog content. It cannot capture analog HD video.

      What is analog HD video anyhow? Seems like an oxymoron, again demonstrating my lack of knowledge in this arena.
      Assuming you have digital cable with an IR Blaster for the cable box, then doesn't that card let you record *everything* you'd ever try to record in that situation?

      I'm not ignoring your points, or playing dumb I really don't see where the problem arises.

    27. Re:You're lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your existing cable DVR is *not* a rebranded Tivo. There are no Tivo-software cable DVRs yet. There are deals in progress to this be an option (presumably for an extra fee) this year, and I believe there are some tests going on in some markets.

      But if you don't know if it's a Tivo or not, it's not.

    28. Re:You're lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense but it's clear you don't know what your talking about.

      The only HD output that an HD cable box will have is either HDMI/DVI (probably requiring HDCP) or Component. There is no card that can take an uncompressed analog HD signal over component input, digitize it and recompress it at a reasonable price. HDMI/DVI is still digital but it's uncompressed and is also lacking as an input option on the card. Additionally HDCP requirements would mean that if such a device ever did exist it's extremely unlikely it would ever work in Linux at least with HDCP working.

      The HD card that you linked to, like every other option out there, will record ATSC (broadcast hd) which is already compressed so all it does is decode the broadcast signal and record the already compressed digital stream. Most also record QAM which is unencrypted cable signal which is also already compressed and recorded directly. Unfortunately QAM is usually just the same channels you could get over the AIR locally and not any of the premium channels. Sometimes On demand is QAM but you have no way to control it just randomly catch other peoples on demand viewing.

      The reason HD tuner cards don't have Component or DVI/HDMI inputs is that it flat out is not practical. The uncompressed HD signal is WAY TO high a bit rate to be managable and realtime compression of an HD signal is still extremly difficult and requires expensive hardware. Assuming I did my calculations correctly uncompressed 1080i signal would be ~180MBs a second or about ~625 GBs an hour. Clearly impossible from a storage and hd speed consideration. Even if I'm off by a bit the figures are still very high.

      The only possible way to get an HD signal off a Cable box to a PC like a myth TV box is via firewire because it provides a Digital connection for the still compressed HD signal. Unfortunately it is totally disabled on alot of cable boxes and can be turned off at will by the channel by setting the 5C content protection even on cable boxes that do have active firewire ports. I currently have a Media center DVR setup using this setup and halfway threw the season I stopped being able to record Heroes in HD because they turned on 5C. Other channels still record in HD but not that one anymore.

      HD DVR really is a pretty messy situation you almost always have to compromise some way. Myth can only get Over the air channels from broadcast or Basic HD channels with cable if that much. Even Tivo series 3 is limited and can't access On Demand or the cable companies tv guide or other interactive things since cable card is receive only and can't transmit commands back to the cable company to support on demand. Only way to get full HD abilities is to accept what ever proprietary system your cable company chooses with what ever limitations it happens to have while having to rent it from them the whole time.

    29. Re:You're lying. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      So AFAIK (which as we now both know isn't too far at all) encrypted signals don't even enter into the equation assuming you have a cable box and an IR blaster to handle it. Is that incorrect?


      Yes, that is incorrect. The cable box will convert the encrypted digital signal from the cable into either an encrypted digital signal that your TV understands (HDCP protected DVI or HDMI), an analog HD signal (component video, labeled Y'PbPr on your TV), or an analog SD signal (S-Video, RF over RG-6 coax which you then tune your TV to channel '3' or whatever to view, or composite 'RCA' video). You can't capture HDCP digital signals, and you can't capture the component signal for any reasonable sum of money, so essentially you can't capture the encrypted HD signal (at least not without an illegally hacked cable box which strips the encryption).

      The card you linked to can capture the digital signal from the cable company (Encoded as Digital QAM) or the ATSC signal from a digital over-the-air broadcast without a cable box, but only if the signal is unencrypted*. To decrypt the signal, you need either a cable box (which will only output in the non-captureable formats I described above, or a CableCARD enabled device. CableCARD certification is only given to devices that impose the above limitations, so that doesn't help either.

      What is analog HD video anyhow? Seems like an oxymoron, again demonstrating my lack of knowledge in this arena.


      High-Def video is not necessarily digital, and digital video is not necessarily high-def. 'HD' refers (typically.. the term has been bastardized recently) to video with at least 720 lines of resolution. That video can be transmitted however you'd like. Common interconnects are Component (analog) and HDMI (digital). Digital cable and over the air broadcasts may be digital, but they can be in the old 480i resolution, and thus SD.

      * Technically, it can capture the encrypted signal, but since it is encrypted you wouldn't be able to decode and display it.
    30. Re:You're lying. by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Actually this makes sense with ANY HD capable tuner. HD is digital and encoded already, just dump it to disk. USB tuners are good for this - they have hardware onboard to gather the data and send it right to the computer. Certainly to save space you might transcode but so far as I know S3 TIV do *not* compress the data which is why they have fairly low hour ratings for HD content.

      BTW - some progress has been made to crack them for hacking. Socketed EPROMs and whatnot are havnig to be installed but it is being done. Sadly it seems this will remain underground a good bit since if the CableCard guys find out they will pull TIVO's CableCard cert. Saddest of all is that CableCard was a sort of thing mandated to get rid of STBs and was SUPPOSED to be a boon to the consumer - instead it allowed the media companies to screw us - hard. I like the idea of Myth, i'd LOVE to have a Myth box, but the encrypted channels and CableCard screwing mean it will likely never happen. When all STB are replaced by Cablecard it's going to be pretty ugly I'm afraid....

      I'll be buying an S3 it looks like and continuing to use my hacked XBOC with XBMC to enjoy emulators and such. Wish the 360 would get cracked to run unsigned code :-(

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    31. Re:You're lying. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      It looks to me like the thing that's going to replace my SD tivo and digital cable box is going to be tvrss.net.

      All the cable company has to do is give me a price for each channel I want, and I'll pay as I go. Since they're not going to do that, well, thanks for the bandwidth!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    32. Re:You're lying. by Darby · · Score: 1

      No offense but it's clear you don't know what your talking about.

      Which I clearly stated several times. Not much room for offense there ;-)

      Thanks for the great explanation. It seems the situation is even worse than I thought it was :-(
      Bastards.

    33. Re:You're lying. by Darby · · Score: 1

      OK, cool. I get it now. Thanks.

  73. What a troll by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    HDCP is devil's spawn, but it doesn't prevent you from using HD for personal stuff.

    HDMI has the advantage of a single audio/video cable solutiion from component to TV. If you want to stream your home movies over HDMI, you can happily do so.

    The fact that the industry has eliminated fair use by stripping your latitide to do what you want with their content (not yours, btw - you don't own what comes to you via sat or cable, nor do you have many rights when it comes to OTA).

    You must be one rich AC, 'cause there's not a lawyer in America who will take this one on for you without throwing a phone number at them. With the area code.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  74. Re:TiVo wins of course... by james_orr · · Score: 1

    That's funny, my MythTV box has uptime measured in months, even over a year and has never had any issues like that.

    The only time it's ever down is due to hardware upgrades or a power outage.

    Oh yeah, I don't particularly care about HD but I do have three tuners, two going to digital cable boxes. Those are controled via USB->serial cables, no need to mess around with IR blaster, if your cable box doesn't have a serial port call them up and ask for a replacement with one.

  75. Re:TiVo wins of course... by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

    copy and pasting commands from a HOWTO isn't really that complicated is it?
    Apparently it is, it would seem that some people would rather have the box built and set up for them - and when that option isn't available, instead of just keeping quiet they piss and moan about how the community should be 'falling over themselves' to build these things. I'm sure that one of the driving ideals behind Myth was that you didn't have to rely on companies to do it for you, with their broadcast flags & whatnot, now you can do it yourself. (Aimud at posts above you BTW)
  76. Slashevidence is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think what the parent is getting at, is that it's possible to capture analog HD from the cablebox and re-encode it. True, it's a lot of wasted processing power and some detail will be lost in the dual conversion, but it's not the stand-out difference some might expect."

    And you tested this when? Nevermind how subjective "stand-out" really is. Plus "It does precisely everything the latest HD TiVo does." isn't correct regardless if one can use the analog hole.

    1. Re:Slashevidence is all that matters by toadlife · · Score: 1

      I've tested it with my Windows media center PC and DirecTV HD receiver.

      The receiver feeds the signal to my PVR150 card via SVideo. The resulting picture sent from my PVR to my TV over the VGA is only 720x480, but it still looks much, much better than a regular TV signal. I have a very hard time telling the difference between direct HD output to my TV and output that had gone through my PVR.

      Obviously, the same results would be possible if I was using MythTV, since it can use the same hardware.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  77. The review only compares a few obvious abilities by Grimwiz · · Score: 1

    A central entertainment system that needs to earn valuable space in the living room should provide more entertainment than just providing television.

    My mythtv box does a few things that I believe makes it more useful to me than a Tivo.

    1. I play World of Warcraft on my MythTV. Its hooked up to a HDMI flat screen TV so the resolution is ok. The play speed is similar to my laptop. This is very handy for hosting a WoW party where real live friends come round to play and eat pizza.

    2. DSmyth lets me watch my recorded shows from any Windows PC in the house whenever I wish. Of course, this is provided wirelessly and works over 802.11b with no lag/stuttering because the bandwidth is reduced by transcoding.

    3. Saves DVDs and CDs to disk, which protects them from the kids losing or breaking the original media.

    4. Transcode ability lets MythTV automatically duplicate files into a format suitable for other devices (Ipaq or phone)

    I assume the Tivo may have a web browser, for news and weather, since everything seems to nowadays, and that you can just open a file share and pull your shows onto a laptop for keeping the kids entertained in the car.

    To prove I'm not just a fanboy, There are some areas which would benefit from development and bugfixes - MythArchive seems unreliable with transcoded shows, Hardware support for some devices (such as USB tuner sticks) is still at the "coming soon" stage which means you have to be a little careful which devices you purchase and scheduling does not automagically allow for overruns and cancellations. Unfortunately, the biggest pain in the rear that I have to deal with is due to the unfortunate state of dependencies that bite me when I try and update my Fedora underlying operating system, but that is a self-inflicted problem and irrelevent to the Tivo/MythTV comparison.

    --
    -- Don't believe everything you read, hear or think
  78. Being a victim is all that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Victimhood

    The victim's basic stance is that he or she:

          1. Is not responsible for what happened.
          2. Is always morally right.
          3. Is not accountable.
          4. Is forever entitled to sympathy.
          5. Is justified in feeling moral indignation for being wronged.
    1. Re:Being a victim is all that matters by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      6 - taking advantage of a black market in place that feeds a need that the Corporations refuse to feed.

      Lots of people look for and use the black market. They all know it's "illegal". Hell Most things sold on ebay that ship from Korea and China are black market items. Illegal copies of electronics made in the same factory as the real ones, bulk superbirght LED's that are sold at $0.05 each and not paying the royalties for the technology. Solid black market stuff.

      I choose to consume a black market item that evaporates in 36 hours when I click delete after watching it.

      In fact I get joy in the fact that it "hurts" the creators. I personally hate TV set electricians and key grips, those sickos!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  79. Re:Good MythTV by mpapet · · Score: 1

    I'm in the process of putting a debian mythtv box and perhaps the smartest thing I did was buy hauppauge's pvrusb2 device. (Not their tvusb2) It's got hardware mpeg decoding. The main reason being I use an old small form factor boxes. Some of them are very quiet and have 16:9 support.

    If you go the way I went, starting with Debian Etch, it's an even longer road for sure. (lirc/BYO kernel package/sleep mode/keeping fans quiet/16:9) This is the price of freedom.

    What no one has mentioned is the lack of a commercial mythtv pre-install on an OEM box. We all know the reason. No one is willing to pay for the _whole_ thing up front. Americans for the most part prefer getting nicked a few dollars a month not really caring that they end up pay much more than just paying less for a device in one swallow. American mobile phone industry is the perfect example.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  80. ESPN HD by dunc78 · · Score: 1
    I assume you get your content from the Firewire port. A few questions/comments:

    I was messing around with MythTV a year or so ago, I think it was just getting the capability to acquire content over the firewire port, I assume that has matured and is a bit easier now. One of my gripes with MythTV was AT THE TIME, it was very hard to get working with the firewire port and would not change channels over the firewire port, where, with Windows, I could find utilities (CapDVHS) that made it trivial to capture content over firewire AND there were also utilities that could change channels over firewire, so no need for IR Blaster. Before people say its easy because I use Windows, all I had to do was downloaded a zip file, unpacked it, and run the executable. No install files or anything as it did't need to register itself.

    Through the firewire port, I am not unable to record the "premium" HD stations (ESPN, HBO, Showtime, ...) but am able to record the "over-the-air" (ABC, CBS, NBC, ...) stations retransmitted by the cable company. Would a CableCard give me the ability to capture both the premium and over-the-air stations? If so, that would be a very big advantage. I currently have recorded in HD on my cable company supplied DVR cable box, the Maryland-Duke game and am unable to transfer it to my computer since it was on ESPN. A 2 hour HD recording takes up approximately 18% of the storage space for my 80 MB DVR.

    P.S. I'm sure I will get a lecture about how easy it would have been for me to do under linux if I used linux all the time, but oh well, the simple fact is I don't, nor does that vast majority of Americans. I do use Ubuntu and gnucash though to keep track of business and personal finances, so I am not completely clueless when it comes to linux. Anyhow, I tried for hours on end to get firewire recording working to no avail, spending large amounts of time on the appropriate irc channels, most of the time finding people who thought it was offensive to their superior knowledge that I had to ask such questions. For somebody remotely computer literate, it just shouldn't be that difficult.

    1. Re:ESPN HD by jotok · · Score: 1

      You can use an IR blaster to change channels on the box (although supposedly, it is possible, if it's enabled, to use serial or firewire inputs on STBs to change channels) and it's not too difficult to capture video off the firewire port. I don't view any "premium" content--in fact, 99% of the content I record is still HD--but, to answer your question, if there were Linux drivers for cablecards then you would be able to rent one from your cable company and use it to decrypt all their content.

      I agree with you that it shouldn't be that difficult and that people should have a better attitude. The MythTV-help mailing list is another good resource.

  81. Re:TiVo wins of course... by cowbutt · · Score: 1

    You can make your life a lot easier by using the Fedora Myth(TV)ology FAQ, or, as another poster suggested, Knoppmyth. Personally, I've been using RH since 1996, so I felt much more comfortable using the former approach, and my MythTV box has now been running for about a year. It's a puny Celeron 1.7G with an equally puny 64MB nVidia graphics card, 512MB of RAM (256MB would probably have been enough), 2 Hauppauge Nova-T DVB-T tuners and a 300GB HDD. About the only seriously geeky thing I did was build a VGA-to-RGB-SCART adaptor because I loathe composite and S-Video output.

  82. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

    I have to laugh because I see two sides to this. One is the hacker type constantly fussing with his system. My MythBox started as a debian system, then got changed to Ubuntu and is now running Gentoo. And now that I did that I just recently saw an article on compiling mythtv to use the framebuffer and qt-embedded and thought about redoing it again... However my wife was patient enough during the last change that I don't want to push my luck.

    It also does work most of the time, and when it doesn't, it's because I've been tinkering with it. I can't do that with Tivo as easily so that's out for me but I'm not your average person. However my brother in law is an average person and I built a mythbox for him. He has no problems with it, it just works for him and his family.

    While it's not for everyone, if setup properly it can be very stable.

  83. Firewire-enabled cable boxes by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Additionally, they are forbidden from encrypting the digital broadcast channels carried on cable (SD digital or HD). They can however encrypt anything else they want.

    My cable company was telling me they didn't have any boxes. It took some searching but I found and printed out that whole FCC ruling and highlighted all the relevant portions. The same ruling also requires new acquisitions of cable boxes by cable companies to have the ports. But it seemed that just by having it in hand they acknowledged everything in it and gave me a Firewire-enabled box that same day. (Incidentally, the same ruling seems to make cable boxes that downconvert HD to SD an FCC violation as it doesn't encourage consumer conversion to HD-capable equipment.)

    Unfortunately I no longer have a link to where to find it, but some Googling for some of the phrases quoted above should turn up a few copies. I do know the PDF copy I found had a error in how they enumerated the findings.

    It took a bit longer to get recording working on the Mac Pro. The cable box and my Canopus DV bridge don't like to play with each other, and occasionally I have to reboot the cable box to establish a valid connection. iRecord doesn't work at all with my box (SA 3250HD). I'm not expecting it to be able to tune the channel, but I also expect it not to just sit there doing nothing when the time to record goes by. So I use AV/C Browser to establish the connection, VirtualDVHS to record, VNC to play as it records, and MPEG StreamClip to convert. (It would be nice to have a non-recording playback option.)

    I'm also having no luck trying to record the S/PDIF out of the cable box with the S/PDIF-in on my Mac Pro. Sometimes I just want to record the 5.1 audio from the cable box, such as some TV themes for resequencing and playing on my iPod. I'm guessing no one else is having problems as I haven't found any tips anywhere on how to get it to work. (I should be able to record the digital audio that way even from channels where the Firewire output is encrypted, yes?)

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Firewire-enabled cable boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally, they are forbidden from encrypting the digital broadcast channels carried on cable (SD digital or HD). They can however encrypt anything else they want.

      Not *entirely* true. It works out more like this:
      a. If local broadcaster provides digital version of broadcast stream, cable provider must broadcast it unencrypted.
      b. If local broadcaster provides digital version of broadcast stream conditionally, cable provider can treat it like any other content.

      For example, my local Comcast branch provides the local independent, CBS, NBC, FOX, and CW in the clear, SD and HD. ABC they do not, as apparently our local ABC affiliate made some sort of demands in order to get the digital stream. Whether that was monetary or some other restriction, I don't know, but that's the way it works. (Having interacted with the local ABC affiliate in the past, that sounds about par for their management)
    2. Re:Firewire-enabled cable boxes by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I no longer have a link to where to find it, but some Googling for some of the phrases quoted above should turn up a few copies.

      (i) Effective April 1, 2004, upon request of a customer, replace any leased high definition set-top box, which does not include a functional IEEE 1394 interface, with one that includes a functional IEEE 1394 interface or upgrade the customer's set-top box by download or other means to ensure that the IEEE 1394 interface is functional.

      To find it yourself from fcc.gov...
      http://www.fcc.gov/ -> Rules & Regulations -> Code of Federal Regulations Search -> Title 47 Telecommunication Oct. 1, 2006 -> Parts 70-79 -> 76.640

      I got a box from my cable company but have been unable to capture anything with the built in firewire port on my motherboard.
    3. Re:Firewire-enabled cable boxes by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      I've been trying to figure this out by reading the rules and regs and comments on it. Is there anything that actually requires an unencrypted signal to go out on firewire? At least, for anything other than the "must carry" channels (things that are broadcast over the air in your area)? It seems like a moot point without that part of it. There's a lot of wiggle room in "functional."

  84. Re:TiVo wins of course... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Informative
    Or simply buy a working MythTV box from a retailer... you can plunk down the money (less than what it costs for a Series 3 HDTV TiVo box) and get a working MythTV unit designed for an entertainment center. After all, TiVo is just a linux box put together by a company, you can get the same thing from other companies that happens to be based on MythTV.

    See this company, for example. Most are like that one, fairly low volume, willing to customize your system lightly, but not so much it messes with their support.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  85. Re:TiVo wins of course... by bgarcia · · Score: 1

    If only that solution had worked for me. KnoppMyth is so out of date that the install disk won't even boot if your optical drive is SATA instead of IDE. And my USB keyboard wouldn't work either when it gave up on the auto install and dropped me into a shell. This was just a standard Dell Dimension E520, with standard components. The KnoppMyth distribution needs to get updated just to support common, modern hardware.

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  86. Re:TiVo wins of course... by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dell E521n with Athlon 64 3200+? $481 USD, before I add the two Hauppauge 150s, and plug in a 500GB USB drive...? According to this guy, it's not 100% effortless... But it sounds like it can be made to work. PLEASE, Slashdot, impress me by pointing me at the cheapest-possible off-the-shelf that will Just Work!
    As long as you are going to add in two pci cards after you buy the computer would you be willing to use a barebones kit from newegg?

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16856167012 $179.99
    MSI Axis 700 Lite Via 1GHz C7 CPU onboard VIA CN700 1 x 240Pin VIA UniChrome Pro 3D Graphic Barebone - Retail

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16820231040 $33.99
    512MB 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 533

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16815116628 $139.99
    WinTV-PVR 500 MCE (dual tuner card since there is only 1 pci slot)

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16822152052 $134.99
    SAMSUNG SAMSUNG SpinPoint T Series HD501LJ 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - OEM

    http://www.imedialinux.com/imedia_mythtv $19
    It lists a price but I was able to download an iso, but it is optimised for the hardware decoding found on the cn700.


    Total $508.23 if shipped to my house, and I could go the local computer store and get a remote and optical drive for another 70
  87. Re:TiVo wins of course... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Disclaimer: I don't use MythTV or a Tivo.

    So I go into the store and start playing around with the Tivos on display while I'm shopping for a PVR solution. I'm looking at a few different options including building my own MythTV box, buying a Tivo, buying a Windows Media Center PC, buying some other appliance, and buying an add on for one of the boxes I have laying around the house.

    I ask the sales guy, "so how do I skip a commercial?" After a long rant about how there is an easter egg that allows me to assign a 30 second skip ahead to a button that does not seem to labeled for that option if I push this particular sequence of controls, I'm thinking something is really wrong with this picture. (On the solution I ended up with I go to the preference section and insert the numbers I want in seconds for the skip ahead and skip back. I want to configure my device not learn how to shoot a fireball in Mortal Kombat XXII.)

    Next I ask about saving video and making copies for on the road. I mean I can record a VCR tape, I should be able to record and burn a DVD, right? Well, yeah if you buy a model that cost another $500 dollars you can burn DVDs with it, but not all shows will burn. Huh? And it won't do VCDs at all for cheaper archives of stuff like news broadcasts and public access lectures from local professors. Hmm, that is annoying. And how easy is it for me to save it as a video file I can watch on my Mac laptop on the plane without wasting my battery on the DVD player? Really its that hard huh? At this point I have some real serious doubts. I mean, the interface is okay aside from the skip ahead, but why can't it do these simple tasks?

    Then the sales guy starts talking about the subscription. Subscription? Why do I want to pay a monthly fee? For up to date program info, hmm, that is fair enough, but there are already like 20 free online Web services that offer that info supported by ads. Why should it cost you guys so much? Why not add a few ads? Oh you do have ads and it costs that much? Isn't that sort of gouging people? So what happens if that service is wrong or spotty or I just don't like it? Can I pay one of the other companies and pick the price/service that meets my needs best? No, I'm locked in huh? I was really not sold on this.

    I ended up passing on Tivo because they seemed expensive and wanted to add in all sorts of artificial problems and limited behaviors for what seemed like no good reason but which, in retrospect looking at their big Cable TV partnerships, makes a lot of sense for them, just not for me as a customer. The solution I ended up using was the combination of an old, old mac tower I had sitting around, an Elgato EyeTV tuner+software, a new video card that would mirror to a monitor and TV, and a DVD burner for the tower. It cost me about 1/3 the upfront price of an equivalent Tivo (would be more for someone who needed to find an old mac) and the program info I use is free and ad supported and I can pick from among a variety of options. When I want to archive a few episodes of a TV show I can use the built in editor to delete the commercials and then click burn to DVD (or VCD) and it works, every time. I can skip ahead or back with the included remote with no problems. Playback of live TV or prerecorded , while burning a DVD and while recording something else causes no slowdown or stutter. Export to Mpegs for viewing on the plane is selecting the export menu item and then dragging it onto the auto-discovered shared laptop drive. It never crashes. It never fails to boot. If the power dies and the UPS dies it recovers just fine. I had a hard drive die once and swapped it out. Every now and again there will be a display problem for the video (every couple of weeks) and I have to quit and restart the application, which takes about 3 seconds. That's pretty much the only complaint I have.

    I guess my point is, you can mock MythTV if you like, but it is just as easy to mock the artificial limits of Tivo. It makes tasks that should be easy, hard and task

  88. Firewire by supun · · Score: 1

    Just to point out, it's a FCC regulation that cable companies provide a working Firewire port on cable boxes, if you request it. You can stream video from the cable box to your computer this way. MythTV supports a few of these cable boxes.

    The problem is getting your cable company to enable it. It not a common request, so no one at the cable company knows how to do it.

    --
    :w!
    1. Re:Firewire by demon · · Score: 1

      Except for the 5C encryption on most (or all) non-OTA HD channels. They may enable the FireWire port, but with that, it's just a useless stream of bits...

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  89. Main TiVo Bitches by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    My major bitches about TiVo:

    1: Their lack of an officially supported 30-second instant skip any longer.
    2: No price guarantee against future increases any time they feel like it.
    3: Their kowtowing to the movie/television industry to automatically delete recorded programs, again any time they feel like it.
    4: Their changing their Terms of Service, again any time they feel like it.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Main TiVo Bitches by demon · · Score: 1

      Their lack of an officially supported 30-second instant skip any longer.

      They never did, but [Select] -> [Play] -> [Select] -> 3 -> 0 -> [Select] works fine on my Series3. Who cares if it's not "officially supported"? Besides, ReplayTV got the bejeezus sued out of them over that, and I think TiVo wants to avoid that sort of trouble (rightly so).

      No price guarantee against future increases any time they feel like it.

      Agreed, but they're hardly unique - your cable company can jack your rates too, and what recourse have you got? That's right, none.

      Their kowtowing to the movie/television industry to automatically delete recorded programs, again any time they feel like it.

      It's not kowtowing - they have to play by the media industry's rules to provide customers what they want, or (once again) risk getting the pants sued off them. It's a simple choice - they chose not to get sued to hell. I'm so shocked.

      Their changing their Terms of Service, again any time they feel like it.

      Can't argue that.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    2. Re:Main TiVo Bitches by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      They never did, but [Select] -> [Play] -> [Select] -> 3 -> 0 -> [Select] works fine on my Series3. Who cares if it's not "officially supported"?

      This, my friends, is a dead canary in the mine. Here is a function almost every user wants. It is also a function the cable company would prefer you did not have. But you're Tivo's customer right, so they will obviously make this easy for you, right? Nope, because the cable companies are Tivo's customers too, and they're willing to commit to pushing crippled Tivos on everyone they can.

      It's not kowtowing - they have to play by the media industry's rules to provide customers what they want, or (once again) risk getting the pants sued off them.

      Your statement is pure propaganda, spread by Tivo themselves. There is no legal risk to Tivo if they do not implement some function to stop you from recording whatever you want, when you want, the same as VCR manufacturers. My PVR was made by a company that has no direct relationship with the cable industry and guess what, it lets me record what I want, when I want and does not let people delete things off my machine. Do you know what else it does? It lets me skip commercials without learning a secret code like I'm trying to get unlimited ammo in a first person shooter. You know what else it does? It lets me burn DVDs and VCDs and export mpegs of whatever I want. You know what else it does? It incorporates a simple editor to let me cut out commercials from my saved video and export it that way if I want. You know what else it does? It lets me pick my own programming schedule provider including ad supported Web interface ones that don't charge any monthly fee and save me a boatload of cash.

      Tivo does not do these things because the cable companies are their biggest customers and Tivo sold out. Stop making excuses for them. Stop explaining away their actions that are favorable to the cable companies not to end users. It is time to move on to something that puts users first and cable companies second.

    3. Re:Main TiVo Bitches by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      And yet you do not name this Mythical DVR - odd that. TIVO has to license the Macrovision software in order to allow playback. When Macrovision revises it's license terms and renwal is needed TIVO has no choice but to bend over and do as they say or be sued for using unlicensed technology. Sorry, but TIVO is painted into a corner here as are all of the consumer devices that want to playback Macrovision protected content. Maybe TIVO should shift their production to China and just violate all the various licenses?

      BTW other than suing them what is TIVO's "direct relationship" with the cable industry? If you'd been paying attention you'd realize that TIVO is attempting to compete with the cable industry not get into bed with them - ask Comcast about that as they are the ones that LOST to TIVO. The 30second skip is still in the software after HOW many revisions? Yeah, in bed with the providers...

      This stuff isn't hard to find out if you'd bothered to keep up but instead you spew FUD....

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    4. Re:Main TiVo Bitches by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      And yet you do not name this Mythical DVR - odd that.

      I'm using an Elgato EyeTV.

      TIVO has to license the Macrovision software in order to allow playback. When Macrovision revises it's license terms and renwal is needed TIVO has no choice but to bend over and do as they say or be sued for using unlicensed technology.

      Wait a second. Are you honestly claiming that Tivo's decision to make it hard for people to enable 30 second skip and the fact that it is not a default setting is part of their macrovision license contract? Is that really what you're trying to convince me of?

      Sorry, but TIVO is painted into a corner here as are all of the consumer devices that want to playback Macrovision protected content.

      ReplayTV lets users skip commercials with a simple jump ahead button. So does Windows Media Center. So does my EyeTV. But Tivo being forced by macrovision licensing? I don't think so. They're being forced by giant, juicy sales contracts from Comcast.

      BTW other than suing them what is TIVO's "direct relationship" with the cable industry?

      They signed a deal two years ago with Comcast to make Tivo built DVRs for Comcast, who would ship them as part of their cable package effectively increasing Tivo's market share by 50%, easily.

      If you'd been paying attention you'd realize that TIVO is attempting to compete with the cable industry not get into bed with them - ask Comcast about that

      You mean the same Comcast that signed a giant distribution deal with them making them Tivo's biggest customer and partner? Tivo sold out years ago, you just did not notice.

      This stuff isn't hard to find out if you'd bothered to keep up but instead you spew FUD....

      Yeah this stuff isn't hard to find out. The deal with Comcast was announced in numerous major publications. Tivos are crippled and are unlikely to ever get better since Tivo got in bed with the Cable companies. It costs a fortune for program info you can get by looking at a banner ad online. It costs a fortune to get a model that can burn a simple DVD, which is crippled to not burn all shows and which has no ability to edit out commercials. It is a pain in the ass to get a simple export to mpeg. The 30 second skip is disabled by default.

      If you want to believe this is because Tivo is incompetent technologically or can't seem to find a good lawyer unlike all the other DVR systems on the market, well you just go on thinking that. Honestly Tivo subscribers are less rational than any OS fanboy when it comes to emotionally defending their purchase choice and explaining away Tivo's actions. They're a business. They were offered a better deal than giving home users what they want.

  90. The Dream for MythTV by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    The dream for Myth TV would be to have it work on your game console. Game consoles come with processors, memory, hard drives, television interfaces, and controllers. To be able to feed in a television signal through USB, or view more freely through a number of legal streaming sites (major TV networks are offering more of their shows over the Internet), on cheap, dual-use (e.g. gaming) hardware that already plays DVD's for you and has a spot in the living room and on your televisions video inputs, seems much better than a PC-based solution.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:The Dream for MythTV by tsm1mt · · Score: 1

      One of the best things I've done for my home Myth setup?

      I bought an Xbox. Installed XboxMediaCenter and the Myth scripts.

      I used to take the recorded shows and burn DVD-RWs for my wife who'd take the DVDs to one of the various TVs around the house (or the portable) to watch her shows.

      Now she turns on the Xbox, picks her show, and away it goes.

      Now I need a few more Xboxes..

      Unrelated, I also use my Myth machine to transcode TV shows into 3gp which I then put onto a Transflash chip in my Motorola E815 and watch "TV" on my phone.

      Cartoons like Southpark and Futurama work great, live action stuff isn't as great, but OK.

      Really handy when you're out shopping and (1 minute later) get bored and find a bench to sit on while you wait for the rest of your party to finish their window shopping.

      XBMC is pretty cool in itself, streaming Youtube, watching my DivX videos, playing MP3s, photo slideshows, along with a host of emulator options, etc.

  91. I want to develop MythTV by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I have seven TiVos, and I want to use MythTV. In fact, I want to help develop MythTV in my spare time. My main barrier is I need someone to point me toward a setup which will give me the best control over both recording and code revision, including personal vetting of every revision coming from the official distribution to ensure it won't disrupt my own customizations or whether it renders mine moot.

    I plan to take the code to a level where it could be used to schedule your own TV station, 24/7 or less, loaded with options and as flexible as a circus yoga master. I'm sure most development has been for in-band control. I want to develop a comprehensive out-of-band control system for it, and then marry the two.

    Just help me get set up and I'll run with it.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:I want to develop MythTV by potat0man · · Score: 1

      I think we've all met people like this.

      If you really wanted to be taking on a project as big as coding a new feature for mtv you wouldn't let two hours of sifting through mailing list archives to find an ideal hardware setup get in the way.

    2. Re:I want to develop MythTV by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      If you really wanted to be taking on a project as big as coding a new feature for mtv you wouldn't let two hours of sifting through mailing list archives to find an ideal hardware setup get in the way.
      OK, so point me at those archives, or a development wiki, something that can get me up to speed with the code and what tools and dev. environment are recommended.

      I need something to push me out of the inertia of not knowing where to begin.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:I want to develop MythTV by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      OK, so point me at those archives, or a development wiki, something that can get me up to speed with the code and what tools and dev. environment are recommended. Mailing lists and other info: http://www.mythtv.org/modules.php?name=MythInfo

      Look at the bottom under Mailing Lists. The archives are the "here" links.

      The documentation is at http://www.mythtv.org/modules.php?name=MythInstall

      The wiki is at http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page -- includes a Developer section.
  92. Re:Tivo? Who Cares? by demon · · Score: 1

    TiVo is dated? Are you thinking of the SD-only Series2 units? The new Series3 is anything but dated - IMO far better than the cableco DVRs. You should check it out...

    --

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
    Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  93. Re:TiVo wins of course... by paudle · · Score: 1

    In what way is the live TV side of Myth flaky? I am working on my own box and often after watching and switching to something such as listening music, I cannot get live tv back without rebooting. All I get is a black screen and sometimes an error message saying my tuner is busy. Is this a known issue I can't seem to find any information about it.

  94. Tivo just works (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done a typical thing. Got together some old hardware, tried out MythTV and found out it actually needs more hardware to work well. I then decided that replacing my 3 tivo + 1 pc that share shows wasn't worth the trouble. Sure I'd take a MythTV setup that would replace my tivos, but I won't buy all the parts and spend all the time getting it to work (along with the maintenance of such a system) when I can plug in the tivos and forget about them because they Just Work (tm).

    1. Re:Tivo just works (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mythtv doesn't need to much hardware if you get dedicated MPEG2 decoding like the EPIA range provide. After spending about a year tweaking, you realise that leaving your system alone is the best policy after a few teething problems, it does Just Work quite well. A good guide to setup from scratch and save some of the headache's is www.mythbox.co.uk. Of course, I didn't have much of an option given that we can't buy Tivos in the UK off-of-the-shelf :(

      Still, running your own myth tv box as opposed to a packaged version gives some advantages - like running other software on there while you watch your favourite shows ;)

  95. MythTV is the clear winner (For Me!) by AtomicMonkeyComics · · Score: 1

    I tried to setup myth about 4 years ago. I could never get it working. I was using an AMD 600Mhz machine and wintv card. I got WebVCR working under Red Hat and that satisfied me for a while. Switching to an Athlon 1600 and a MPEG2 capture card I was able to get myth working under FC2. It worked very well. I added another tuner card. All worked well. I decided to add a third card, so here is what I did. I bought a new logic board/processor. I used the same brand (VIA logic/Athlon 3200 processer), and imaged my old unit to my new unit. Everything worked. Not one problem. I added a third capture card. Everything worked. Not one problem. I installed MythFrontend on an old Apple G4 733. It was just fast enough to handle Myth, and now I had Myth in the bedroom and living room (on the G4). I installed it on my G5 in my office now I have myth in three rooms. The old Athlon 1600 in the basement runs myth on the spare TV (using the same image!). Laptops? both running MythFrontend wirelessly. TV movies games, whenever, wherever I want. If I want to add a show from work, I just type in my home URL, (thanks DYNDNS) and search, and record. Myth does everything I need and the monthly fee $0.00!

    Of course I am in the camp that absolutely sees no benefit whatsoever in HD TV. I don't need a 20 inch tv that costs as much as a week vacation at Disney World. I don't use a cablecard, and I don't really see the need for BLU-RAY or HD-DVD. It is just TV. I like to watch what I want where I want and how I want. I put forth as much effort as I needed (and once I got the initial setup done, there was minimal effort) to get the system running. Almost all of the hardware was spare stuff I had sitting around collecting dust. And since I enjoy working on PCs and I find open source anything to be good for the soul, you could almost say it was a pleasure to go through the work involved in setting this thing up.

    And don't forget that monthly fee; $0.00!

  96. At my house MythTV wins by leoxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The uptime on my MythTV box is 133 days. I haven't touched the software for over a year, because it works fine and I don't want any of the new features. When I want to watch a show, I click TV->Watch Recordings and then select what I want to watch, and when commercials come up, a couple of presses of the "Fordward" button on my remote (configured to skip ahead 30 seconds) is all it takes to skip them. If I want to watch a DVD, no problem, play a game or two (kids love the old SNES games), no problem. Listen to my MP3/OGG collection, no problem. It all just works.

  97. But How by kahrytan · · Score: 1



      But How would a CableCARD work with a TV Tuner for the computer? Comparing the two is pointless. Media center cases (Thermaltake makes the best.) are cramped for space. And those riser cards only support 3 slots TOTAL. They only support the 3 PCI or 2 PCI + Graphics slot. Graphics slot for a graphics card to better drive the video and untax the cpu. 1 PCI card is most definitely a tv tuner. That just leaves one more pci slot. Are you willing to spend couple hundred for HD Audio motherboard or will you need a sound card? Will you want second tv tuner? CableCARD would take up a PCI slot.

    And theres the problem of Linux based Mythtv. MPAA or Cable companies will never support CableCARD on Linux. The very nature of Linux won't allow it. Linux is not profitable to companies to develop software for it. Cable Companies can't give OSS developers the ability to decrypt cable programming at will. It would allow people to steal cable. CableCARD is quite literally a Windows and OSX only thing.

    There is only one foreseeable way to bring HD cable to Mythtv. CableCARD based cable box.

    My question remains. HOW would a CableCARD fit into a Media center case with mythtv driving it?

    --
    \
    1. Re:But How by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the CableCard works like another tuner. Also, you mention wanting two tuners, well why not get a dual tuner card? Takes up 50% the space of two cards.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    2. Re:But How by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      CableCard can do multiple streams with a single card. So you have multi-tuner there. Get a decent mobo with SPDIF out and you don't need to worry about sound. Get an Nvidia 6150 based board and you don't need to worry about video either, it's more than enough for HD. I just bought such a board for AMD X2 CPUs for $45 at NewEgg. For your tuners you can also do a device like the HDHomeRun by SiliconDust that takes 2 ATSC or QAM streams and puts them out over ethernet! I'm running one and it works flawlessly! If CableCard were more open, SiliconDust could build one that you could put a card into and you're done. Instant HD Cable over ethernet.

      Personally, I think the FCC should require CableCard AND Satelite TV to be 100% open source for the card drivers. The keys are on the smartcards, and you can't steal cable/sat with the code to run the card, you have to hack the card itself. Use a decent card design and you can prevent most of that sort of thing. It seems to work fine for Europe with DVB, I see no reason it can't work here in the US as well.

    3. Re:But How by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Or just drop some ethernet and put all that stuff in a big backend server somewhere. Then get a nice, slimline case running an mATX board for your frontend.

  98. Practical experience with MythTV by jlrowe · · Score: 2, Informative
    In late December, I set up a unused PC (600 MHZ) with 2 Haupauge PVR 150 TV cards and a 200 GB hard disk as a MythTV Frontend/Backend. The cards are Standard def. The setup was straightforwards and pretty easy. I did have some issues with jerkiness due to the video card in the machine, but got it to work well enough by changing some settings etc.

    After And I set up the server, I then got an even older 450 MHZ PC with barely enough RAM, and made a front end out of it. Again, that didn't work well, but a cheap Nvidia card took care of that AND gave me Svideo out so I could run a monitor and a TV as a second monitor (dual screen) at the same time. I then forced MythTV to run on the TV and got TV plus internet. It was only jerky if I did too much internet or whatever on the PC while watching TV. You do have to watch what window has focus, if you want to do some control to MythTV, but you get used to alt-tab etc.

    Because that worked so very well, at only the cost of 2 cards, I replaced the front end machine with a new 3200+ AMD socket 754 MB and chip at a little over $100. I had the case and everything else already. I also just took the 450 MHZ frontend and put it in another room, still on the MythTV network.

    The new AMD system is a dream. I run TV, internet, Openofffice.org, VNC to other machines, XP in a VMWare session, and much more. And performance is never a problem.

    MythTV is OTA, and there are plenty of stations, ABC NBC CBS PBS etc all have mutiple channels each. Fox goes HD next year, but I can record all of these SDTV using power search (record a show anytime it finds it by name, don't record dups and reruns, and skip commericals.

    nice.

    Still running on the 600 MHZ backend, but I am planning to upscale to a higher end AMD and plenty of RAM and 1.5 TB of Hard disk. This will be my main server for whatever purpose, including VMWare etc. Oh, and 4 or 5 HDTV cards, plus the SDTV cards while there is still SDTV.

    Really, this is the coolest thing for OTA TV.

    Distribution used: MythDora http://g-ding.tv/, which is Fedora Core 5 and MythTV plus add-ons and on one install DVD. Also nice. FC6 would have been better, but this will do fine.

  99. What about EyeTV? by Upaut · · Score: 1

    I use a $200 Miglia addon to my mac mini, and can use both the eyeTV settup and my macmini's apple remote to enjoy watching my shows. Simple. Easy. And I don't pay every month... Its the best of both worlds...

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  100. Re:TiVo wins of course... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    The hours you spend setting up the device aren't necessarily "TV watching hours." People primarily get PVRs so they can spend LESS time in front of a TV, not more. For every hour of commercial TV, a PVR saves me 12-15 minutes of time. It also allows me to watch TV only when I'm not doing something else, usually allowing me to be more productive elsewhere.

    So yeah, spending many hours configuring a PVR is wasted time, not just "TV time."

    That being said, I'm looking to drop cable and go with a Mac Mini + eyeTV combo + iTunes TV store combo, just as soon as the new mac hardware comes out with the (rumored) H.264 decoder chip and the (rumored) BluRay/HD-DVD player in Leopard and hopefully more TV-conducive outputs.

    This has the added advantage of (a) costing almost as much as a TiVo and (b) wasting almost as much time setting it up as MythTV. ;-)

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  101. Re:Every time I think of taking the plunge and do by Drakonian · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure if this occurred to you or not, but reading a mailing list isn't likely to be a balanced source of both positive and negative information. There aren't all that many users that write to the mailing list and say "I built my Myth box, it works great and I'm really happy!". They just watch their TV in bliss. What you get is the people complaining with problems.

    If you have Sys Admin'd you'll be able to set up Myth. I did it - it took a lot of time, but now that it's setup properly, it works great. If you aren't into spending the time and tweaking, by all means, get a Tivo. If you enjoy dinkering around, you can handle Myth. The main thing that took me so long was I was trying to re-use cheap, old hardware. Get stuff that works. That means a Hauppauge PVR card and an NVidia video card with binary drivers. ATI cards are a nightmare to get the TV out working properly.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  102. Re:Every time I think of taking the plunge and do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, though, that the posts on the mailing lists are heavily skewed towards the people having problems. People like me, who don't have problems, don't generally post to the list.

    I've been using MythTV for years, and have had few problems. And I have a wife and two preteen (one now teen) children, who also use it. I'm still on standard def, though.

  103. Re:Every time I think of taking the plunge and do by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Judging the state of MythTV by the posts on the users list is not an accutate metric. It's like going to the local Toyota dealership, only visiting the service department then saying "I don't want a Toyota, they are always broken down!". Generally the people posting to the list are the ones having the problems, you don't hear from the people for whom installation went smoothly.

    the killer part is what will happen when something screws up while I'm not around, and my wife gets mad because something didn't work

    FWIW, the only issues I usually see is when I change something. As with most Linux applications, once it is stable it will usually stay stable unless you change the configuration (hardware failures notwithstanding).

    still, major kudos to Jarod Wilson for having created this amazing open-source wonder.

    IIRC, it was Isaac Richards that originally developed MythTV. I think Jarod is the guy with the most popular install guide.

    --

    Enigma

  104. Re:TiVo wins of course... by cesman · · Score: 1

    Out of date?! Have you tried R5E50. At the time of it's release, it was about 2 to 3 weeks older than the newest Sid. KnoppMyth has improved greatly. The key to making it better is by providing details on the the forum.

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  105. Re:TiVo wins of course... by galorin · · Score: 1

    I went the xubuntu to mythtv route, since I needed my mythtv box to act as a bog-standard desktop as well. Sure it's got it's flaws. The frontend regularly crashes when listening to music, a power outage will completely fry the MySQL database, and may even do some damage to the filesystem, and the times for shows are never right. Would I swap it for a TiVo? Heck no. One Hauppage DVB-T tuner card does me just fine. Maybe I'll get another card eventually so I have fewer conflicts. I'll also grab TV shows from bittorrent or import dvd's from online dvd rental for movies.

    My wife also has no problems with mythtv. My daughter likes it as well, since we can have her shows at any time she wants. That's a mixed blesing as she's only 3 and the stuff on Cbeebies she likes grates the nerves.

  106. Re:TiVo wins of course... by cesman · · Score: 1

    Prior to the release of R5E50, I'm almost certain one of our testers tested on a SATA optic drive and had no issue. While SATA optic driver are becoming more popular, I don't think there are standard. The use of USB keyboards has been a non-issue for several releases now. Like I state, I'm almost certain there now work out the box. Again, the way to help improve KnoppMyth is by providing details on the forum.

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  107. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

    How do you get video out? Just the VGA on the motherboard?

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  108. Re:TiVo wins of course... by modemboy · · Score: 1

    Hear, Hear! Like nearly everything these days, the best info can be found at user communities and forums. cesman has done some amazing work in the 2 years I've been running knoppmyth and I can't thank him enough. It took me probably 4 hours to get setup my first time and that was as a fresh linux convert. Since then I can't count the hours mythtv has saved me in commercial watching alone, not to mention a greater understanding of linux. Hell 3 months ago I set up a knoppmyth box for my mom who has no linux experience and it has worked perfectly for her, I was expecting to have to do way more support and it has been basically none...
    keep on rocking cesman!

  109. MYTH is for recorders...TIVO is for ???. by pjviitas · · Score: 1

    I have had good success with MythTV however, it is not geared for channel surfers with set-top boxes.

    The extra channel change loop to the set-top box makes channel changes agonizingly slow. The only real setup for hard core surfers are set-top boxes with built in PVR's.

    As far as HDTV is concerned...until Hauppauge makes a PVR board with component video capture MythTV users will be stuck with s-video level quality.

    I do admit that HD is great however, s-video capture has been serving me just fine.

    Hedgehog

    1. Re:MYTH is for recorders...TIVO is for ???. by demon · · Score: 1

      As far as HDTV is concerned...until Hauppauge makes a PVR board with component video capture MythTV users will be stuck with s-video level quality.

      You'll be waiting awhile, as there aren't currently any ASICs which can encode HD resolutions in realtime. It takes a *lot* of horsepower. Hence why all the commercial DVRs, instead of trying that method, are moving to integrated systems that grab the raw MPEG2 bitstream and store it - otherwise it wouldn't be commercially viable to offer such a device...

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  110. Tivo only costs $1, but MythTV costs $75,203 by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1

    You will need to spend a good 5 hours of your time just to make sure the components you buy are all compatible. At $200 the hour this is $1000 of my time (without including the cost of the hardware and config).

    If you're making $200 an hour, I suggest outsourcing setting up your MythTV box to a college student for $40 an hour. Indeed, if you do go with a Tivo, I'd suggest getting a high school student to buy it and plug it in for you (at about $10 an hour) because your time is much too valuable to waste going to a store.

    Meanwhile in reality:

    Therefore, the absolute cheapest you could purchase a TiVo Series 3 with 3 year service is $949.99 or as much as $1519.63.

    Conversely I spent about $900 on all new parts for my Myth box. Service is free. I blew about 16 hours* total researching and setting it up. At a far more reasonable hourly rate of $50 an hour, it cost me about $800 of my time. It's been working for a year and a half now without problem. I have no reason to expect it to not last another year and a half. So $1,700 for three years of "service." More expensive than a TiVo, yes, but hardly outrageous. I think it's a reasonable premium for being able to burn to DVD without restriction, to be able to watch arbitrary videos from the internet or friends, to be able to watch DVDs on it (I'd been using a PS2, but it recently started refusing to play region coded DVDs, so this has been a useful free bonus), and generally not be locked into a single provider.

    I've actually got both. I prefer my Tivo for straightforward recording and watching. But MythTV is a reasonable alternative and the price difference isn't overwhelming.

  111. Re:TiVo wins of course... by frogstar_robot · · Score: 1

    I created a media box for my living room in early december. As of that time, it wasn't terribly in sync in Debian. Since the box has worked since, I haven't been following the new versions. (So there you are: something nice to say!) It has been a constant on Slashdot the past couple of years that everytime KnoppMyth is mentioned, someone complains that it is out of date. I merely proposed a solution to this.

  112. Re:TiVo wins of course... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    First off it depends on getting hold of the right howto (The one in ubuntu community docs is pretty good so is the one by stephen parker).

    However I wouldnt call it easy there are a few concepts that are not explained very well.
    First is the PRE-install work which means getting your distro working with the right drivers and the TV-Card(s) working properly. For digital tv Kaffiene is essential and for analogue you can't go far wrong with xawtv.

    Once you are able to watch TV on your box you can then start to work on Mythtv.
    Critical is setting up mysql and the mythtv user configuration has to be by the mythtv user or you find problems with permissions later.

    Biggest issue with most howto's is that they are easy to misread and just are not quite step by step.

    multiple cards are not that easy either you need to learn about udev and identifying your cards with a symbolic link. with 2 or more cards which physical card gets assigned to which device is random at bootup.
    God Knows how you get on with 2 physically identical cards and different sources.

    Once it is setup thou your granny could use it.
    system requirements are not too bad I setup the backend on an AMD Athlon 1.4ghz PC with 512 of Ram and it copes fine with a couple of frontends connected.

    If you have the time and a system spare its a good little project and you learn a lot and it does work very well.

  113. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Quikah · · Score: 1

    Cablecard works on the Series 3 now.

    --
    Q.
  114. Re:TiVo wins of course... by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

    That could be a minor drawback for people wanting to watch tv on television screens. I think I overlooked that because I bought a 24" flat panel monitor in january and use it for both tv and computer needs.

    http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/chipsets/c-serie s/cn700/
    That is the chipset homepage and it lists the cn700 as having tv-out capabilities.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16813181016 $149.99 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16813181021 $172.99 both of these have video out but they requie a mini-itx case and power supply.

    If you have an old computer lying around with two pci slots you could buy a bigger hdd a pvr150 and a pvr 350(this gives hardware decoding and a tv out). The biggest reason I keep looking at via boards is because they have hardware mpeg-2 decoding and they use less power so you can use smaller fans (possibly none).

  115. You guys are missing out by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 0

    EyeTV is a wonderful, cheap, affordable solution to PVR.

  116. Is MythTV intelligent yet? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    i.e. Does it learn my preferences automatically and search for shows that I will probably like? Scouring the TV landscape for gems of showsamong the crap?

    Tivo does.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Is MythTV intelligent yet? by fxer · · Score: 1

      Ugh, my TiVo doesn't get close to finding "gems among the crap", it should be illegal to say that. However, Netflix can't recommend a good movie to me either, at least they have a contest going to try and improve on recommendation technology.

    2. Re:Is MythTV intelligent yet? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Netflix can't recommend a good movie to me either Netflix recommendations used to work back when it was all movie buffs. Now that all those tasteless assholes out there have come in and made every move (from tripe to gold) uniformly 3 1/2 stars, it doesn't work.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  117. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

    You can also just buy a VGA to S-Video, if I'm not mistaken - they're a bit pricey...

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  118. Re:TiVo wins of course... by AusIV · · Score: 1

    One other point (and you may have had a solid Myth system for long enough to see this): When you get a device like a Tivo that is stable, simple to use, and works every time, things change. It becomes a new tool that transforms how you do things. I can't imagine watching TV without Tivo--it's that different (and that much better) than plain-old service. I skip commercials (but fast-forward through them so I can catch new show announcements or the occasional ad that is amusing the first time you see it). I watch shows on "Tivo time," skipping through the boring parts. I fast forward to the end of the remodeling show so I can see the results without all the witty banter. I check out old shows I haven't seen in years because Tivo had space and nothing better to do than record it. I don't worry about when seasonal shows are on (like the Peanuts ones)--Tivo catches them for me.

    Exactly how I feel about MythTV. I've got nothing against Tivo, and I wouldn't be surprised if I use one some time in the future. It sounds like it's more featureful than I thought. The DVRs offered by my cable company, on the other hand, suck for reasons described in my last comment.

    Where do you get your TiVo? Is it something you bought third party? If so, how does it work with digital cable? According to the website you'd need the $800 dollar model to get HD.

  119. Re:TiVo wins of course... by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

    Wait, you are saying there is another way to make friends?

    You must be new here. . .

    --
    "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
  120. Re:TiVo wins of course... by kelnos · · Score: 1

    I've got nfs share over wireless (802.11g)
    There's your problem. Unless you have a remarkably clean environment (no neighboring networks) and never use the wireless network for anything else, 11g is not suitable for video streaming. I'd suggest investing in a powerline networking solution, or just run good ol' ethernet cable if it's feasible. 802.11n may work for you when it's released, but who knows...
    --
    Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  121. Re:Every time I think of taking the plunge and do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always pass by the Myth TV Users Mailing List to make sure that I get the most relevant and updated hardware necessary, and instead end up reading a sampling of the horror stories they go through Do you also swing by the TiVo customer support centre to see what sort of horror stories their users tell?
  122. Re:TiVo wins of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're a faggot

  123. Still useless for me :( by Builder · · Score: 1

    MythTV is still useless to me... I look at it every year or two, but there is still no clear way for me to plug my Sky satellite system into a Myth box and manage that with programming, etc... Sad, because I'd buy a box and get going in a heartbeat if I could use my Satellite.

  124. Re:MythTV can handle HDTV/encrypted content in Eur by Builder · · Score: 1

    Thanks - that's really handy info... Hopefully Sky will be supported on some solution then.

    I've asked about this on the lists a couple of times but never got anything quite as useful as your post.

  125. Re:TiVo wins of course... by cowbutt · · Score: 1

    Either use a VGA card that has composite and/or S-Video outputs that are supported by X, or build a VGA-to-RGB-SCART adaptor if your TV has that as an input option. I guess you might be able to adapt the circuit for displays with RGB component inputs too.

  126. Re:TiVo wins of course... by stang · · Score: 1

    Where do you get your TiVo? Is it something you bought third party? If so, how does it work with digital cable? According to the website you'd need the $800 dollar model to get HD.

    I bought my Series 1, a Sony SVR-2000, from Sound Advice (a Tweeter company). Bought my Series 2 from Crutchfield. I bought the Series3 from the TiVo Community store—they had the best price at the time.

    There are two CableCard slots in the back, one for each tuner. You plug your coaxial cable from the wall into the back of the unit, and stick the Cablecards in the slots. Cable company authorizes the cards, and you're good to go. My cable company (Brighthouse Central Florida) had to come out to plug the cards in and authorize them, but there was no charge, and the whole thing took about 15 minutes.

    If you want HD, you need the Series3. I bought mine for $680. The TiVo Community store has 'em for $619, and you may be able to find 'em cheaper.

    --
    "200 Quatloos on the newcomer!" "300 Quatloos against!"
  127. I don't GET HBO/Showtime etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So with TivoHD I have, according to your specification a non-functional system.

    And it can't play games...

  128. It's all about expectations by jbarr · · Score: 1

    I've used "standalone" DVR's for a long time, and have always been a huge advocate. I never really persued the "home-brew" route mainly because of the cost and time investments. I preferred the non-cable company ReplayTV models for control, but was always plagued by limitations imposed by the cable/satellite providers. Things as simple as controlling STB's and as esoteric as HD recordings were always hurdles, but what I was able to get to work worked well. As for cable company-specific DVR's, I used a MOXI dual tuner HD DVR, and it was excellent, but again, its specific feature set was controlled by the cable company, so I was at their mercy.

    Recently, I chose to abandon abandoned the standalone versions to build an HTPC running SageTV. The end result, like MythTV, is an amazingly tailorable, controllable PVR system that gives me exactly what I want in a PVR. I can record and playback SD and HD content, edit videos, burn them to DVD, remotely access my content and schedule recordings remotely, and a host osf other excellent features. (I can record unencrypted HD broadcasts over cable using the HDHomeRun and its SageTV integration.) But all this "greatness" comes with some limitations: I cannot record encrypted HD channels that I pay for. I must have an STB to receive and record any premium content including premium movie channels, PPV, and On Demand. The very nature of non-integrated recording means that recording quality will degrade slightly from the original.

    The good news in all this is that the WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor) is very high, so the limitations are certainly non-issues.

    But this all boils down to the simple fact that if you expect full cable/satellite company compatibility, you will be disappointed with any non-integrated solution. Until a viable CableCARD solution surfaces that lets PC's record and playback SD & HD recordings, your expectations will NEVER be met with a legal home-brewed system. Your best solution is to look to your cable/satellite provider for their DVR offerings.

    That said, if you are willing to put up with the limitations imposed by the cable/satellite providers, then you can enjoy amazing flexibility and features. that will really transform how you watch and manage your TV, DVD, Music, and general information content.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  129. Married Geeks Choose Tivo by mjeppsen · · Score: 1

    Most married guys I know choose Tivo (yours truly included).
    All the additional features in the world cannot make up for the pain you will feel in your life from a missed Greys Anatomy recording, or any sort of DVR downtime while you upgrade to Teh Latest Release of Myth...

    -MJ

  130. MythTV works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am happily married and using MythTV. Actually, my wife uses it, not me. Setup took a few evenings, but since then I've never had to touch it and no problems whatsoever.

  131. MythTV wins by default! by fgouget · · Score: 1

    Flash news!
    Tivo is unavailable to more than 75% of the world population.
    (hint there is a world outside the US)

    So for most of the world MythTV wins by default.
    This little fact is too often forgotten.

  132. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  133. Re:TiVo wins of course... by sootman · · Score: 1

    "Broadcast TV is dead, by the way."

    Then how do the torrents get made in the first place? ;-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.