Slashdot Mirror


Remains of James Doohan Lost in New Mexico

caffiend666 writes "According to a Space.com news article the cremated remains of 200 people were lost in the mountains after their trip to space. 'The search for the UP Aerospace payload of experiments and the cremated remains of some 200 people — including "Scotty" of Star Trek fame, as well as pioneeering NASA Mercury astronaut, Gordon Cooper — continues within rugged New Mexico mountain landscape.' Is it just me, or does it seem appropriate that they lost the landing party? Here's to a safe recovery!"

220 comments

  1. No problem. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Spock will figure out the only logical place it could be.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:No problem. by srmalloy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess the engines really couldn't take it...

    2. Re:No problem. by rob_squared · · Score: 0

      Too bad it wasn't Mexico. If I had to be lost somewhere, it'd be the land of Latinas and tequila.

      --
      I don't get it.
    3. Re:No problem. by rubycodez · · Score: 0, Redundant

      someone should have warned them, "the engines, they cannae take much mare a this!"

    4. Re:No problem. by novus+ordo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Keith Richards' nose?

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    5. Re:No problem. by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude, joking is fine and all, but just keep it to a minimum. It's not just James Doohan's ashes lost in New Mexico, it's also the ashes of John B. Marques, a 24 year old man from Austin, Texas, who died in December 2004. He was my close friend. There are also 198 other people - people with families and loved ones.

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    6. Re:No problem. by Miseph · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to be an ass about your dead friend... but seriously, relax. Suck as it may, he's gone, and there's no sense in worrying he might have been injured, or that he's offended.

      Besides, I'd expect that if your buddy wanted to be launched into space, he'd have a sense of humor about this sort of thing.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    7. Re:No problem. by lordmatthias215 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I had to be lost somewhere, it'd be the land of Latinas and tequila.

      Sounds a whole heck of a lot like the New Mexico I know...

    8. Re:No problem. by McFadden · · Score: 4, Funny

      And in that vein...

      I wouldn't worry about looking for Doohan. Just wait a few weeks and he'll show up on eBay.

    9. Re:No problem. by sherms · · Score: 1

      So will Scotty and the others. I'm just curious at what price? In my will, I already have a practical joke planned on my baby brothers. I just with I could be there to see it unfold.

    10. Re:No problem. by Himring · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The one human state free of all troubles and worries: dead....

      Monty Python did the entire "dead parrot" skit at Graham's funeral....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    11. Re:No problem. by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 1

      Well, technically, I think he wanted to be launched by catapult... but this was the next best thing.

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    12. Re:No problem. by camg188 · · Score: 1

      I dunno... It seems sort of romantic to me to have your mortal remains lost in a mountain. Seems like a pretty good resting place to me.

    13. Re:No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ghrahm (sp?) is dead? Well, damn! I was hoping they'd get back together, now I know why they can't.

    14. Re:No problem. by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Life sucks - might as well accept it.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    15. Re:No problem. by Himring · · Score: 1

      Graham Chapman isn't it? The one who was king arthur. Yes, quite dead. Pushing up daisies and all that....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    16. Re:No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't worry, the 'next generation' will discover him after 77 years or so.

  2. Poor Gordo Cooper... by Blackbrain · · Score: 3, Funny

    As Gordo would have said: "Looks like someone screwed the pooch on this one".

    --
    Where would we be if Wheel had hid her round rock in a cave instead of showing everyone how it rolls?
  3. Clever... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

    He *knew* the Nexus was going to go through that exact point.

    1. Re:Clever... by dilbert627 · · Score: 1

      Either that, or the Genesis project is being developed at Area 51.

  4. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He was always wearing a red shirt. It was inevitable that he would be lost.

    1. Re:Obvious by Infoport · · Score: 4, Funny

      no, it is only the new crewmen in red shirts who are doomed. If you have a nickname, you are pretty much safe.

      and being Ensign something, well you might as well leave your good boots at home for someone else.

    2. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bu-dump-bump plus cymbal.

      Someone will say that Scotty was protected because he had a name and wasn't of "ensign" rank. I'd say that he lasted soooooo long, but the power of the red shirt killer was simply too great to overcome.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshirt_(character)

      Note that Uhura also wore red. http://www.megomuseum.com/startrek/uhura.html

    3. Re:Obvious by solitas · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    4. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My daughter took one look at this and said, "The Wiggles?"

  5. what by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It sounds like this landing did what they wanted it to other than the fact they lost the thing- which makes me wonder why they didn't think of using a tracking beacon of some sort rather than calculating where the thing was. all they would need to do is go toward ths signal.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im not understanding the problem here, from the article it sounds like the whole thing was a-ok, just the post launch hardware didnt land where it was supposed. If the rocket did what it was supposed to why would the remains and other crap have come back to earth?!

    2. Re:what by wizardforce · · Score: 5, Informative

      If the rocket did what it was supposed to why would the remains and other crap have come back to earth?
      because it was never meant to leave Earth completely, it was SUPPOSED to come back down
      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    3. Re:what by jddj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or just put a tractor beam on it on the way down.

    4. Re:what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      It sounds like this landing did what they wanted it to other than the fact they lost the thing- which makes me wonder why they didn't think of using a tracking beacon



      You misspelled tractor beam.

  6. Raise your hands by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who else thinks the whole idea is kinda retarded? I mean, in the beginning I thought the ashes of those people will be dispersed in space, which was very strong as a symbol and a ceremony, of sorts.

    But carry them in space and land them (and now .. to lose them)? What the hell was the effin point of this whole thing?

    1. Re:Raise your hands by Infoport · · Score: 1

      hey now, everybody who has actually been to space stand up

      (wish I could just go up to space and back)

      although ejected would have made a lot of sense...but then wouldn't they have had to give it a ceremony, like when Spock was launched into space (with Scotty playing a dirge on the bagpipes, flag over it, etc) ?

    2. Re:Raise your hands by BlargIAmDead · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think the point was to see how the remains of several cremated people reacted to zero g conditions. We now now that when subjected to these certain conditions they gain enough intelligence to outsmart NASA :)

    3. Re:Raise your hands by Clazzy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What the hell was the effin point of this whole thing? They simply haven't invented photon torpedos yet so can't blast their corpses into space.
      --
      If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
    4. Re:Raise your hands by Keys1337 · · Score: 1

      FOR CHRISTS SAKE!!! You know damn well he can't stand anymore! He's just a clump of ash in a can. j/k

    5. Re:Raise your hands by Saeger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *shrug* Most cultures are still obsessed with the mind's dead vessel; that's not going to change overnight.

      IMO, both cremation & cemeteries are a huge waste of resources. When I finally get around to writing my Will, it'll include something to the effect: "If my pattern of mind is beyond repair, drop my naked nutrient-rich matter into a vertical hole and plant a tree. I forbid energy-wastful cremation, and burial in a rip-off casket in a drab cemetery surrounded by giant obelisk phallic symbols..." Of course, there's probably some business-friendly laws which says that's illegal.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    6. Re:Raise your hands by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the hell was the effin point of this whole thing?
      to make money, of course. it was a private enterprise.
    7. Re:Raise your hands by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IMO, both cremation & cemeteries are a huge waste of resources.

      Cremation is useful in that it avoid infection spreading (especially, but not limited to when the man/woman died froma dangerous infection disease). It gets cremated and can be dealt with with much less resources.

      But dropping the vessel from space and losing the ash in a forest isn't exactly what I imagined it should be like.

    8. Re:Raise your hands by sendai2ci · · Score: 2, Informative

      Claim that it is your religion, PC should still trump business-friendly.

      Islamic burial traditions for one specifies burial without a coffin, with markers or any sort discouraged. Although they are laid on their right side with their face towards Mecca...

    9. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah it's just that depending on where you want that tree, you might be considered a biohazard. Can't have you leeching germs into the local water supply or whatever.

    10. Re:Raise your hands by prelelat · · Score: 4, Funny

      to make money, of course. it was a private enterprise. I can't tell if that was a pun or not.

      Either way good call.
    11. Re:Raise your hands by metlin · · Score: 1

      Human beings and cultures across the world are obsessed with symbolism - and death.

      A lot of things we do, intentionally or otherwise, are deeply symbolic in nature.

      And one but needs to look at the various religions to understand our fascination with death.

      So, combine the two and you are bound to get some weird (and occasionally interesting) results.

    12. Re:Raise your hands by Black-Man · · Score: 1

      Yeah... except you're probably considered toxic waste considering a life of ingesting pesticides, heavy metals, and drugs.

    13. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And one but needs to look at the various religions to understand our fascination with death.

      Religion doesn't have a fascination with death. Religion has a fascination with using the fear of death to control their followers. Indeed, religion has about as much fascination with death as it does life.

    14. Re:Raise your hands by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1

      You're right. Cremation and burial is definitely a huge waste of resources. We should leave bodies where they fall; it's a safe, clean alternative.

    15. Re:Raise your hands by value_added · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "If my pattern of mind is beyond repair, drop my naked nutrient-rich matter into a vertical hole and plant a tree. I forbid energy-wastful cremation, and burial in a rip-off casket in a drab cemetery surrounded by giant obelisk phallic symbols..." Of course, there's probably some business-friendly laws which says that's illegal.

      I had this in mind when I chose to bury two of my dogs in the backyard. Looking back on the experience (I ended up with two small plaques and planting some flowers and shrubs), I don't regret my decision. I could write an essay on the subject, but it should suffice to say it just seemed like the right thing to do. From every point of view.

      Whether the above is legal, I don't know. My guess is that it isn't. Once upon a time people (at least those who owned land) had family cemeteries. Maybe someone here who knows more about such traditions could enlighten us. At any rate, today, at least here in California, burying someone on private land, irrespective of whether you own one acre of land or 1000 acres, was made illegal sometime in the 1920s (?).

      It's kind of shame, really. Obviously, we can't all just around burying people just anywhere (broadband deployment is complicated enough), but there's something to be said for being buried in the dirt, and having someone come along and plant some grass or a tree where you were laid to rest.

      Recyling at its best.

    16. Re:Raise your hands by syousef · · Score: 1

      But carry them in space and land them (and now .. to lose them)? What the hell was the effin point of this whole thing?

      Why to boldly go where no cremated remains had gone before of course!!!

      That said I agree with you - what a waste of money, time, and resources.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    17. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Agreed. I thought it was so very cool he was going to have his ashes sent into space. Like a burial at sea but so much better.
      Has anyone ever heard of foregoing a burial at sea for sending the ashes on a frickin boat ride? To return later?

      -"How was your trip?"
      -"Great! We reached the zenith of pointless stupidity!"

      I don't know what's more disappointing, the final place these ashed end up, or the living people who are behind this whole thing.

    18. Re:Raise your hands by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well spoken. It's an industry. The one thing I remember when my grandfather died (it was an insanely emotional period - my other grandfather had just died a week earlier, both unexpected), the undertakers were there in no time and asked my grandmother: "do you want him to be buried in first class or second class ground?" (literally). What is she supposed to say at such a time? Of course she chose "first class", thinking she would honour him that way. In reality, she just paid a lot of money.. for what? I was quite disgusted.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    19. Re:Raise your hands by Trogre · · Score: 1

      You'd have to make damn sure they left orbit completely, or there's going to be some pretty messed up space trips in future decades.

      You know, space junk and all that.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    20. Re:Raise your hands by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I've always told people that:

      1.) I don't care what you do with my body after I've died,
      2.) unless my death is suspicious. Then I want to be buried and preserved as best as possible, so that if the police later decide they need clues and want to exhume my body, they can.

    21. Re:Raise your hands by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      considering a life of ingesting pesticides, heavy metals, and drugs.

      i don't see what my high school years have to do with anything...

    22. Re:Raise your hands by Maxx169 · · Score: 1

      I've made it very clear to my other half that I want to be stuff and left on the couch. Preferably in an intimidating pose.

    23. Re:Raise your hands by freaker_TuC · · Score: 3, Informative

      My grandma has died 2 months ago, the government already closes the bank account at first knowledge of death. This to pay the expenses of the undertakers, the church service, the after service (in Belgium with coffee cakes and sandwiches, because it's a tradition to eat and talk with the relatives around in a room/tables) and some other expenses...

      These expenses start with the "cheapest" which is not really "cheap" anymore but rather expensive and if you want to be buried with some decency (which won't change anything for you anymore anyways), the bill will be -very- expensive/uncatholic ... It seems to be a profitable business, maybe some idea through the web *shrug*

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    24. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully you'll be more interesting of a compost heap than you did as a human being, eh loser? "I forbid energy-wasteful cremation..." Just goes to show that the Internet acts like a giant magnet for all the insane fuckers in the world. Get yourself some medication.

    25. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I had this in mind when I chose to bury two of my dogs in the backyard.

      How did you get them to stay there? Mine always dig themselves out.

    26. Re:Raise your hands by feyhunde · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The laws aren't Business-Friendly, they are related to public health. Lets say I did what you wanted and planted you in a shallow grave with no casing and planted a tree. While a very nice gesture, your bodies' parasites and fungi live on. And if you died of say, Cholera, your Cholera rich body is leaking it into the ground water. While there is a racket associated with much of the funeral biz, and much of it is greedy, there is reason behind the laws. Burial laws are in place to be a public health issue, and are written in river valleys where water tables make it so that naked corpses in shallow holes spread disease. Now what I like are cremation with a few options for ashes. A caveat for incase of foul play of course. I like spreading my ashes as an option. Burying an urn is what my grandparents had done (they are in national cemeteries). While the last option that sounds nice is get your ashes compressed into a Diamond/Diamond like gem. I'm morally against to normal Diamond due to the economics. However, I like the idea of having my ashes in a Diamond that can be given to my grandchildren and on down the generations.

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    27. Re:Raise your hands by damista · · Score: 1

      It is disgusting. When my daughter died last year, the funeral director wanted to talk us into a $5000 coffin, even though she was to be cremated. Where's the point in paying craploads of money for a casket which will be burned? We ended up with a $1500 coffin...still pretty steep for "fire wood".

      When it's my time, I'll be cremated and my ashes scattered at the same place as my girl's...hopefully by then, it is possible to cremate people without putting them into an expensive box first.

      Funeral directors are business people and as such they are interested in making money...the more the better. Their advantage is that they can use people's grief to make even more money. Grieving peole are easy targets as they are very emotional and much easier to talk into something. As you said: Who would say 2nd class?

    28. Re:Raise your hands by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very few people can pull off "intimidating" when stuffed and left on a couch. "Creepy", on the other hand...

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    29. Re:Raise your hands by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Burial rituals are for the living. Chances are your family will want to honor your wishes, if in doing so they will be coming to terms with your passing. Whether resources are wasted or not is incidental.

      As for me? I won't need to worry about it. Death is no big deal. Been there, done that. This time, I'm going to live forever.

    30. Re:Raise your hands by KarmaRundi · · Score: 1

      Well, you can make the whole thing a little less wasteful by being an organ donor or you could donate your body to science so some medical student can get a few more miles out of it. If you plan to die in Tibet, you could consider sky burial.

    31. Re:Raise your hands by siriuskase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When my husband died, I rented a coffin for $200. We used it for almost a week before finally getting him cremated. Not bad, I guess considering what a motel goes for around here.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    32. Re:Raise your hands by Columcille · · Score: 1

      although ejected would have made a lot of sense

      How much thruster capability did this wee spacecraft have? Enough to eject several cannisters of ashes and propel them away? And better, propel them out of earth orbit so as to avoid even more space junk? Would the wee beastie craft have been able to make it back into the atmosphere as planned? I wouldn't think so, and Scottie would freak out trying to fix the problem. Rest in piece, indeed.

      --
      I love my sig.
    33. Re:Raise your hands by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Cardboard cremation boxes can be had for about $200.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    34. Re:Raise your hands by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Anti-terrorist burial tradition specifies the body be encased in a wooden casket lined with pigskin. Extremely wealthy terrorists may be hermetrically sealed in stainless steel or precious-metal caskets, in a bath of pork lard.

    35. Re:Raise your hands by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1

      Actually, cremation is not just energy-wasteful, it is also resource wasteful. At least if you are composted (whoops, I mean "buried with reverence"), most of your physical matter has the potential to be reused, be it by bacteria, plants or worms. Sure, cremation could be solar powered (just pop the body up to the top of the tower of that solar furnace in New Mexico for a few minutes), but wouldn't it be cool if our cultural tradition was to drop the body in a hole and plant a tree? Cemetaries could become parks for happily remembering loved ones instead of the barren (except for manicured grass and big drab squares of stone), desolate, *business-efficient*, unhappy places they are now.

    36. Re:Raise your hands by popejeremy · · Score: 1

      I agree. When I die, I want to be catapulted into a shark infested ocean or something else both spectacular and cheap. I have no desire to be a burden financially those I leave behind, and if they can get a cheap show out of it, all the better!

    37. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That kinda sucks for anyone years in the future who may want to study the body to see how you lived and what caused your death.

    38. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just had a weird flashback of playing online games and seeing corpses dissolve into thin air. How do they do it.... ;)

    39. Re:Raise your hands by Rie+Beam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the idea of a minimal-impact burial is alive and well. Fitting with the tradition, it's called a "green burial". Google isn't all that helpful at this point, but it's essentially being unembalmed, being thrown in a cardboard box and having a tree plotted over you as opposed to a traditional process. I'm not sure how popular it is now, but an article from about a year ago denotes a small, but growing, trend:

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/artic le.html?in_article_id=389741&in_page_id=1879

    40. Re:Raise your hands by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Now, just think about that.... $200 for a cardboard box.

      I'm pretty sure I could find something that comes in a box that size that would cost under $200. And then I'd have whatever came IN the box too.

      For under $40, you could build a box out of 3/4" plywood, marine-grade, not even the cheap stuff.

      Even at its most cut-rate, the funeral business makes the mob look like upstanding citizens.

    41. Re:Raise your hands by Serzen · · Score: 1
      I worked in a cemetery for two years, mostly as just a caretaker, mowing the grass, trimming around headstones, straightening the headstones that the riff-raff came and knocked down, things like that, but I did have to do a few burials, and it was a highly educational experience.

      In New York, a body is required to be buried in a concrete "vault", which is nothing more than a box for the casket to go in. This is to prevent diseases from leeching out of the body and into the ground where they can infect the groundwater or the cemetery employees. I was told by my overseer that the law was enacted after a particularly rainy year in which a number of cemetery workers had contracted TB from standing in muddy pits digging graves next to plots where TB victims had been buried. How true it is, I don't know, but, as someone who has been in a pit, digging that hole, I was glad to know that the plots around me and uphill of me were all ones with vaults.

      The rules for cremated remains don't require that the ashes be placed in a vault, and there are special rules for Jewish and Islamic burials, whose faiths require that the corpse be buried in contact with the soil, but I only got those in passing and never had to bury any Jews or Muslims, so I don't know the details.

    42. Re:Raise your hands by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      I made a "biological will" as we call these docs here in Canada 10 years ago (I was about 22). In it, I give my body to science after I'm done with it. How this works is that they can take out any good parts for transplants, studies, dissection, training, etc. After one year, anything left is cremated and the ashes given back to the family. I asked for my ashes to be dispersed in nature after. That way, my leftover body will have some good use instead of costing thousands of dollars to be disposed of.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    43. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Firmly clutching the remote in one hand, right? :)

    44. Re:Raise your hands by bulliver · · Score: 1

      How did you get them to stay there? Mine always dig themselves out.

      You went too far. You were supposed to bury them in the Pet Semetary (sic), not the Micmac burial grounds...

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    45. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This... http://sniff.numachi.com/pages/tiGLADBAG.html makes a lot of sense to me!

      Send Me to Glory in a Glad Bag

      (Don and Mim Carson and Steve Mason)

      People tell me that I ought to save my money *
      So that I could be laid away in style,
      In a walnut box with all the fancy trimmin's
      Vacuum sealed to keep me fresh a while.

      cho. But Send me to Glory in a glad bag.
                Don't waste a fancy coffin on my bones.
                Just put me out on the curb next Tuesday
                Let the city sanitation bear me home.

      I don't need a fancy funeral *
      Flowers and tears and all that jive
      When I'm dead that won't impress me
      Just buy me a beer while I'm alive.

    46. Re:Raise your hands by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      "Cemetaries [sic] could become vast areas of infectious disease for happily dying alongside loved ones instead of the barren (except for manicured grass and big drab squares of stone), desolate, *business-efficient*, unhappy places they are now."
      Fixed that for you. ;)

    47. Re:Raise your hands by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That kinda sucks for anyone years in the future who may want to study the body to see how you lived and what caused your death.

      We're in the 21-st century. He doesn't need to study your body to find how you lived, he just needs to Google your name.

    48. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a small, but growing, trend
      Can I make any money on it?
    49. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.. This is because they (and probably you) are American.

      Americans lose whatever critical facilities they ever had if 'Space' or 'Guns' or 'Dollars' are mentioned. They also believe that what they see on TV or from Hollywood is actually real. Don't laugh - how else do you explain current American foreign policy?

      All that has happened to the remains (and what will happen to paying passengers in the near future) is that they go up in the air and come down again. Much like a see-saw, only higher. There is a justification for sounding rockets to do this, but it's pointless for anything else. Incidentally, if you had used a sounding rocket, you could have been doing this easily and cheaply since the late 1960s.

      If you ever thought this was anything different, you are part of the problem. Learn to use your mind critically. Then maybe you will start to appreciate civilisations rather than tearing them apart.

    50. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And the article title is misleading "Why dad's eco-funeral went horribly wrong". Well, what is exactly their grief ? They bury it in the ground to be recycled and they complain not beeing able to remember the exact place ? It is weird on quite a number of levels.

      Furthermore, I saw standard funerals going wrong, and it is not really pretty either (for instance, 200 person to the funeral of an old lady of my family, that died 45 years after her husband, and had her place reserved next to him. She basically spent several years planning her funeral. Unfortunately, coffin size changed over the years and they discover during the ceremony that they could not get the coffin in the grave without putting it vertically. I can't really render it with words, but it definitely could be a scene in a Zoolander-like movie. And I won't describe one case, in my wife's family, in a winter burial, where one guy carrying the coffin slipped near the top of ice covered street. The coffin made a 200 meters glide, and fortunately didn't broke in pieces)

      So, yeah, green burial are a good idea, even if my family have no idea of where my body is. Or dumping my body in the sea, would be ok too. Or just burn me and let my friend snort the ashes...

    51. Re:Raise your hands by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      In many ways I agree. But then, cemeteries are the only places where they won't build highways or office complexes. As small as they are, they are patches of more-or-less protected land with a little bit of green.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    52. Re:Raise your hands by name*censored* · · Score: 2, Funny
      >>Just had a weird flashback of playing online games and seeing corpses dissolve into thin air. How do they do it.... ;)

      Ah, nuts to THAT! Iwant to know how they manage to RESPAWN.
      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    53. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because it's true!

    54. Re:Raise your hands by stanmann · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has to be certified by the state health department for storage and transport of human remains. doing that as a one off today will cost you rather more than your materials. and yes, for $40 of materials, but how much time, and how much does that time cost on a commercial scale.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    55. Re:Raise your hands by apparently · · Score: 2, Informative
      "drop my naked nutrient-rich matter into a vertical hole and plant a tree." Well, the safer way would be something like Capsula Mundi:

      Capsula Mundi is a design for a biodegradable coffin made from starch plastic that holds the deceased in a fetal position... Capsula Mundi is planted in the earth like a seed. Above it, to signal the presence of occupied space, is a shallow concave circle dug out of the ground. In the center of which, a tree is planted, the essence of it chosen in life by the dead one, the care of this tree is the responsibility of everyone. The aim is ecological burial, literally a more natural way to decay.

    56. Re:Raise your hands by ultraexactzz · · Score: 1

      Family cemeteries are fine in Ohio, so long as the decedent has a familiar relation to whomever is already buried in the cemetery, and so long as the owner does not receive any monetary compensation.

      --
      Never underestimate the potential of Human stupidity. -Heinlein
    57. Re:Raise your hands by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> ...thrown in a cardboard box and having a tree plotted over you...

      When the tree reaches maturity, it is choped into a few cords of firewood, which are then shot into space.

    58. Re:Raise your hands by nobuddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My will says "Give away any parts anyone wants, burn the rest."

    59. Re:Raise your hands by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To the best of my knowledge, in many states, it is required that you buy a casket, and in most states it is required that you buy *some* sort of container, even if it's just a little cardboard box like an ice-cream container for the ashes. Luckily, those are cheap, comparatively, like $20 or so. My dad's ashes are still sitting in that little box, 6 years later, on my mom's clothesdryer. (Not a real sentimental family, but boy we have procrastination down to a science.)

      And if he were still around, he'd be pissed, coz he always said he wanted to be composted.

      It *is* legal to bury a human body on your property, although it's very difficult -- easier if there's any evidence there was a pre-existing graveyard there already -- but there are requirements for depth and containment that make nutrient-recovery difficult.

      I personally plan on chugging a quart of nitroglycerine and jumping off a building (if my heart lasts long enough to get to the edge.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    60. Re:Raise your hands by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      And funeral directors all over the U.S. almost universally claim that "state law" in whatever state they are in requires a burial vault into which the casket is placed.

      Unfortunately, in most states, this is a lie. Some cities may have such requirements, but few states have burial vault requirements. Nevertheless, grieving family members are told all kinds of false regulations that cost money.

      The funeral/burial industry preys on emotions and milks families out of huge amounts of money (thousands of dollars) for unnecessary funeral products or services.

      Best bet, if you're going to go for the whole funeral/casket/burial thing is to pre-plan (but don't pre-pay!) your funeral services before you die. That way, you can pick out the low-cost items that you want to buy rather than have a highly emotional spouse or sibling pick "only the very best" for what is now a lump of organic material and water.

    61. Re:Raise your hands by Serzen · · Score: 1
      While I'm not going to try to deny that there are shifty funeral directors, my comments were based on first hand experience as the guy who puts the body in the hole. There are regulations that the cemetery has to follow to be allowed to operate. I was a cemetery employee, paid by the local government, and never once received a dime from any funeral home--even when the funeral director failed to bring pall bearers and we were asked to carry a casket, the cheap bastard never even offered to give us a tip.


      Where I worked, and in all the cemeteries I've been in, it's the job of the "gravediggers" to stay out of the way and not get involved in any capacity with the services. The funeral home is supposed to supply all materials for the burial, in accordance with local regulations; the only thing we provided was the digging, filling and mowing, also the cement footer for the headstone to be placed on was provided by the cemetery.

    62. Re:Raise your hands by raddan · · Score: 1

      Hellooooo... katra? Not everyone thinks ahead enough to dump their brains into Dr. McCoy for safekeeping. Sometimes you just gotta have a body.

    63. Re:Raise your hands by mcb · · Score: 1

      You might be interested in green burials.

    64. Re:Raise your hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At any rate, today, at least here in California, burying someone on private land, irrespective of whether you own one acre of land or 1000 acres, was made illegal sometime in the 1920s (?).

      And these are the kinds of laws (like drug, gambling and prostitution laws) that only complete fucking idiots pay any attention to.

      If a loved family member wants to be buried on their own land, the human being hasnt been born who can say "No, youre not allowed".

    65. Re:Raise your hands by gotem · · Score: 1

      Now honey, here's the ring from my ex-wife, literarily , would you marry me?

    66. Re:Raise your hands by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I'm going through this right now - but in a very different way. Mom is dieing - we know it, SHE knows it. She called in a family friend who USED to own a funeral parlor - and still has connections, and said "I want to be cremated, after a 2 night wake" She planned it out totally, except for chosing her casket because she is not well enough to go see them - she gave me what the budget was (cheap) and said "spend no more than X" One of the local churches (mom isn't a big church goer) will bury your ashes in the rose garden. That church happens to be where the local AARP meets, so it's pretty much the closest thing to a church she regularly goes to

      So, basically, instead of leaving the burden on me (dad has dementia, so..), she planned the who thing out - right down to what she wants in her death notice

      I'm glad I'll probably have this Mother's day with her (didn't expect to) and if she makes it to her birthday at the end of the month without suffering, that'll be a bonus

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    67. Re:Raise your hands by Chyeld · · Score: 1
      When I still had enough free time to play games online in a semi-competitive manner, I used to joke when I died:

      Everytime I die, I ask myself,"What would Jesus do?"
      Then I respawn.
    68. Re:Raise your hands by elsilver · · Score: 1

      When I finally get around to writing my Will, it'll include something to the effect: "If my pattern of mind is beyond repair, drop my naked nutrient-rich matter into a vertical hole and plant a tree..."

      Not to put too much of a damper on your plans, but your Will won't make it through all the necessary bureaucracies for several months after your death -- much too late for it to contain any useful instructions on your disposal.

      I'd suggest a sticky-note on your monitor instead.

      E.

    69. Re:Raise your hands by catbutt · · Score: 1

      I think the question was directed at those spending the money.

  7. Sad :( by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Scotty always wore a red shirt :(

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Sad :( by DumbSwede · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the game of life we are ALL wearing red shirts

    2. Re:Sad :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not. I'm not wearing a shirt. Or pants.

    3. Re:Sad :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a nudist, you insensitive clod!

      (hmm... waiting, waiting, waiting.. Lameness filters always seem to take the thrill of spontaneity away.)

    4. Re:Sad :( by endlessoul · · Score: 1

      Damn, man. That was deep.

      I mean +10 Insightful deeeep.

    5. Re:Sad :( by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      There is no weird spooky symbolism in the people in landing parties who wear red shirts being the ones most often to die.

      The red shirt signifies someone from the security department. They go along on landing parties to provide security and are logically the most likely to be killed.

      Scotty was a different case, he was a high staff officer, and probably wore whatever he wanted.

      Before anybody flames me for being a trekkie, please note that I am commenting about the real Star Trek program, not the derivative junk, which I find irrelevant. I only remember watching one Star Trek episode in real life in an original broadcast, because I wasn't that old at the time.

    6. Re:Sad :( by Panzergheist · · Score: 1

      I always thought of mine as a darker shade of fuchsia, really.

  8. clear throat, cue theremin by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rural New Mexico, the final frontier. These are the remains of James Doohan. Its five-minute mission: to explore cactus and scrub mesas; to not burn up and burst its canister; to boldly go where no cremated remains have gone before.

    oooooo waaaahhh, wah wah wah wah wah....

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:clear throat, cue theremin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      oooooo waaaahhh, wah wah wah wah wah
      oooooo waaaahhh, wah wah wah wah waaaaahhh (ooo wah wah wah ooo waah waah)
      oooooo, wah wah wah wah wah wah, oooo, waaaaah waaaaah
      ooo wah wah wah wah waaaaaaaaaaaah

    2. Re:clear throat, cue theremin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please post this with a Creative Commons License. I sooooooooo want to use it.

    3. Re:clear throat, cue theremin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You left out the whooshing...

    4. Re:clear throat, cue theremin by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

  9. Sent into space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, if I was, like, "Send my ashes into space when I die" and they were like, "OK, we can send you in a suborbital trajectory", I'd be all like, "Fuck that bitches, I said SPACE".

    1. Re:Sent into space? by Duggeek · · Score: 1

      werd.

      --
      This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
  10. Somewhere, by greenguy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    James Doohan is having a good chuckle. And then rolling his eyes.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    1. Re:Somewhere, by MorpheousMarty · · Score: 1

      You were lucky to have a LAKE! There were a hundred and fifty of us living in shoebox in middle of the road.

  11. Not again, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the second time he's put himself into a transporter loop waiting for rescue.
    Clevernickname better get off his blog and go get him.

    1. Re:Not again, by ICA · · Score: 1

      If only I had moderator points, that is one of the best comments I have read in a long time.

  12. Damn it Jim! by nihilistcanada · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am a doctor not an orbital scientist!

  13. His Last Words by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Yah c'nt bury me, yoo got na ashes!"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  14. Wow, they weren't retarded. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Informative

    They did use a tracking becon. As far as they can tell, it is still working, to a couple km (diameter) circle. Unfortunately it landed in mountainous terrain, and "go[ing] towards the signal" is a physical impossiblity. (Okay, not impossible, but quite difficult). Also, the terrain is messing with the signals.

    Next week (no hurry I suppose), the manufacturers of the tracking device are bringing more sensitive equipment and more experienced searchers to search for it.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Wow, they weren't retarded. by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Mental note: Always use a GPS beacon. This way we know where it is all the time.

    2. Re:Wow, they weren't retarded. by Panzergheist · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should volunteer to help in the search. I know this place like the back of my

    3. Re:Wow, they weren't retarded. by NeoManyon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next week (no hurry I suppose), the manufacturers of the tracking device are bringing more sensitive equipment and more experienced searchers to search for it. Yes it is only the experienced searcher that can walk around and properly say "Nope, not here..."
      --
      Your thoughts form your reality.
    4. Re:Wow, they weren't retarded. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Good point - cheaper than a big search party, I'd guess. Unless the rocket landed in a desert where they could just walk over and pick it up. Anyway, your design is better for the worst case. Sorry, no mod points today.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Wow, they weren't retarded. by mkatrina · · Score: 1

      Actually, let me give you the rest of the story (sorry Paul) I'm actually a big supporter of space commercialization but I'm very concerned about Rick Homans (Bill Richardson's appointment) being in the leadership position for the spaceport. He isn't technical but he is 100% political. Why does that matter? My friends at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) tell me that Jerry Larson, President of UP Aerospace, had developed an impressive flight profile for the launch on April 28th with a good landing point. Jerry had built into this launch a good amount of margin just in case the rocket went off course. The WSMR guys tell me they were very satisfied with the plans. So what happens? At the last minute, Rick Homans decides that there isn't enough error margin and forces UP Aerospace to move their landing point 5 miles west. Jerry resists and is told to either move it or don't launch. The result is a rocket flight that goes exactly according to Jerry's plan but because Rick forced them to move the landing point it ends up in the mountains. As of today they still haven't recovered the payload. That is not a success even thought Rick is telling everybody it was a great success. If you are supposed to launch and recover stuff as part of your commercial operation then a failure to recover is a failure. Rick was interviewed by Kevin Robinson of the NM Biz Weekly and he admitted to moving the landing point but said "Safety is number one." I'm so tired of hearing that from politicians that want to hide their timidity and cowardice. Space flight is hard and it's dangerous but so is flying through the air. Rick now has a safe flight under his belt and all of the people who paid money to fly to space have got nothing to show for it but less money in their pocket - good job Rick. That's good for business??? You might think that the spaceport would be trying to make it up by helping UP find the payload - wrong. My friends at WSMR tell me that Jerry has been searching by himself with help from WSMR but nothing from the spaceport. Once again a great move to encourage business on the part of the state. Here is the big question: What if Jerry is unable to find the payload? Do you agree that Rick Homans should commit to finding the payload even if it takes a couple of months? Or, should he just leave the remains in the mountains? Keep in mind, it is Rick's fault that they are lost in the first place. Finally, a related point. Is the focus of the spaceport just on investing to build a playground for the rich. Originally I didn't think so but based on their "lack" of support for small companies like UP Aerospace, it seems that the state, in particular Rick and the Gov, are focused on ensuring that nothing jeopardizes the space port for Virgin Galactic and Sir Richard. The poor guys at UP have invested everything they have to get their company going (credit cards, 2nd and 3rd mortgages) and they are at best tolerated by the spaceport. I think if you look at the numbers, UP has invested more in the state than Virgin Galactic has. How ironic!

  15. Searching in the wrong place... by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has anyone checked ebay yet?

    --
    What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
  16. Summary is incorrect by treeves · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nitpick: TFA says they didn't get into space. TFS says "remains of 200 people were lost in the mountains after their trip to space."

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    1. Re:Summary is incorrect by Doppleganger · · Score: 1

      TFA says, in its summary, "Cremated Remains of 200 Lost in Mountains After Trip to Space".

      TFA also says "the UP Aerospace SpaceLoft XL rocket and its payload nosed into space on a suborbital trajectory"

      Where does it say they didn't get into space?

    2. Re:Summary is incorrect by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      Hmm. The article I read says it did get into space:

      After a successful blastoff from New Mexico's Spaceport America on April 28th, the UP Aerospace SpaceLoft XL rocket and its payload nosed into space on a suborbital trajectory. As part of launch operations, the rocket was tracked by specialists at the neighboring White Sands Missile Range.
    3. Re:Summary is incorrect by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      I think he's classifying space as orbital and beyond, not suborbital.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  17. Genesis by Expertus · · Score: 0

    Looks like they missed the the planet Genesis by quite a bit.

    1. Re:Genesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Looks like they missed the the planet Genesis by quite a bit."

      Either that or there's a man-made cave in New Mexico that no one knows about

  18. as lame as it sounds? by hurfy · · Score: 1

    "...location of the rocket hardware is known within some 1,300 feet (400 meters) or so. But given the dense vegetation on the side of the mountain being searched, along with equipment available to the search team, pinpointing the exact locale has proven a tough assignment.

    Yet another trip up on the mountain is slated next week, Larson said.

    Joining the search this time is the manufacturer of the transmitters onboard the rocket gear."

    Excuse me....transmitters and parachutes and known within 1300 feet and you couldn't find it?!? What is their idea of a transmitter..an RFID tag glued to a button battery? Or did they not think to include a matching receiver in the recovery team?!!?

    Good aim tho to hit the only vegatation in New Mexico ;p

    1. Re:as lame as it sounds? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part about it being on the side of a mountain? how about the part where the radio signals are bouncing around the canyon walls creating echo's and false readings?
      When was the last time you climbed a mountian? searching them isn't always a walk in the park in your tennis shoes.

      Heck you didn't even have to RFTA just the comments to learn that much. Slashdot is definitely going down hill.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:as lame as it sounds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Excuse me....transmitters and parachutes and known within 1300 feet and you couldn't find it?!?
      Finding a wreck in the wilderness is hard. Note that a circle with a 1300ft radius is about half a mile on a side, and covers about 120 acres. It's tough to find a relatively small bunch of equipment in the middle of all that.

      About ten years ago a business jet crashed into the woods near their destination airport in New Hampshire while landing. Despite a concerted effort by rescue crews to find the wreck in order to rescue the people on board and the fact that the aircraft was being tracked on radar right up to the accident and it crashed at a fairly well known location about 20 miles from the airport, the wreck of the jet was not found for almost three years.
  19. Breaking news... by fireman+sam · · Score: 4, Funny

    The ship has been found, but unfortunately everyone on board have been confirmed dead. :(

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    1. Re:Breaking news... by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      Insightful? WTF are the slashdot mods been smoking?

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    2. Re:Breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that he is implying that it doesn't matter that their remains are lost, as they are already dead. I as much as anybody else respected "Scotty" and some others who were flown up but it's not like their ashes will do them or us any good.

    3. Re:Breaking news... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect. This is a bizarro-world instance.

      The ship has NOT been found, but everyone on board has been confirmed dead.

    4. Re:Breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, for the best fucking laugh I've had in a LONG time. LOL

  20. Too much shore leave again... by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    He'll get recovered.

  21. Maybe Will Robinson by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Maybe Will Robinson will find Scotty.

  22. It was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She can't take any more, Captain!

  23. Obligatory Bones Quote: by rts008 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's dead, Jim!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  24. No big surprise by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Funny

    The capsule probably just encountered a rift in spacetime and ended up landing somewhere like ancient Rome or 1920s Chicago. As I understand it, this kind of thing happens all the time to space vehicles. They probably shouldn't waste too much effort looking for it in the present.

  25. Sounds like a good chance... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    We have a payload in that thing. The email we got made it sound like they have a pretty good chance of getting it. The black paint looks cool, but it also looks like a shadow.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  26. Send in the red shirts! by WheelDweller · · Score: 3, Informative

    In these crazy days, doesn't it seem like there's a lawyer somewhere just WAITING for the first time a journalist writes the headline, "Lost in Space" so they can get copyright infringement?

    Maybe I'm too cynical. :>

    Seriously though; "Scotty" was a huge hero even before Star Trek. One of his previous roles was on June 6th, 1944: he was one of them attacking Fortress Europa. His efforts, and the efforts of thousands of other guys wasting their childhood fighting Nazi Germany is why we're free. Why the show could air; why the benefits of freedom are so available. I liked'em before, but upon learning that, I'm his biggest fan.

    My dad came behind the push at Anzio, he got a late start. Dad is why I know this was such a huge accomplishment. Thanks so much, "Scotty".

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:Send in the red shirts! by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      "...wasting their childhood fighting Nazi Germany..."

      What the hell, man? I know all war is supposed to be bad these days, but I had a grandfather who fought Nazi Germany. My other grandfather was in the Pacific. Neither of them have ever stated that that wasn't the right place for them to be.

      Wasting is the wrong word there.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    2. Re:Send in the red shirts! by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

      True; "wasting" is the wrong term. Maybe I sould have said "sacrificing".

      My intent was to convey that, for that generation, parties with the girls back home were trades for battles with some real, hard troops...and women they night never see again. They had to grow up very, very quickly. If they grew up at all.

      Their sacrifice was huge; and in this propganda war, it's refreshing to be called on such a typo!

      Thanks for improving my day!

      --
      --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  27. damn! by networkzombie · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing he was already dead. On a more serious note, I totally knew this would happen.

  28. anywhere near ...? by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    Maybe, while they're looking, they'll find Bender's head.

    Of course, they'll have to rebury it to prevent changing the timeline.

    1. Re:anywhere near ...? by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Of course, they'll have to rebury it to prevent changing the timeline. "Ooh, a lesson in not changing history from Mister I'm My Own Grandpa! Let's get the hell out of here already! Screw history!"
  29. Not exactly by kahrytan · · Score: 4, Insightful


      They should launched Doohan and Cooper into deep space. They deserve better then to be shoved back to this stinkin planet.

    --
    \
  30. They'll be found eventually.. by sprior · · Score: 3, Funny

    On Ebay...

  31. she's breaking up!! by einnar2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all those years of saying things like "she's breaking up cap'n, she can't take much more of this", it was bound to eventually happen. The engineer had to pass away before his ship even had a chance of malfunctioning like this, after all. ;)

  32. Someone failed grade 5 math by Rix · · Score: 0

    Take directional measurements at two points. See where they cross.

    1. Re:Someone failed grade 5 math by afaik_ianal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... and somebody failed physics.

      If they followed your suggestion, they probably wouldn't find it. The signals in mountainous terrain bounce all over the place.

      Even if it were that simple to locate, you've still got to get in there to pick it up.

    2. Re:Someone failed grade 5 math by fistynuts · · Score: 1, Funny

      Taking measurements at two points to find something is surely why they call it triangulation.

      --
      "You heard the man, Tubbs.. get undressed."
    3. Re:Someone failed grade 5 math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To solve this problem you must use direction finder systems that actually measure the phase of the signal and the delay between waves. The signal that comes first (read first as fractions of microseconds before) is the one that went through less (or zero) reflections. These receiver stations usually have an antenna array forming a circle, and only one station can find the rough direction where a signal is coming from. You don't need multiple stations because the software can find the direction by measuring the signal delay among all antennas and drawing a line between the antenna with the lowest delay and the one with the highest, the first being the direction where the signal comes from.

      This is very expensive stuff, but governments have them and use them everyday to monitor for airwaves use/abuse; if you have good connections maybe they can help.

    4. Re:Someone failed grade 5 math by Floritard · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ironic that the remains of the transporter chief lie in an area so inaccessible. A solid advocate for beam technology even from beyond the grave!

  33. He's not really dead by Rix · · Score: 3, Funny

    He just stored himself in the transporter buffer.

    1. Re:He's not really dead by Kiuas · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that, he's dead Jim!

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  34. what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gordon Cooper died?

    Old age, I assume?

    Crap I feel old. These were heroes when I was growing up in the late '60 well into the '70s... The whole space race was still a recent thing. Like the Beat... Oh, I really, really feel old now.

    I wonder how many other 'doters feel this way right now.

  35. but ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1


    not as we know it !

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  36. Looks like he's... by ICantHearYourMusicAn · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...gone where no man has gone before. (But they're trying to fix that too)

  37. proprietary crap must be the problem .. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    must be because of darn gps problems, the federation had better launching and tracking technology...
    that will teach them to use proprietary crap!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  38. Re:Obvious Umm.. ."Where No... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Man Has Gone Before"...

    Scotty: Beige-ish shirt.

    IIRC, he also was in beige in the episode with Captain Pike...., in the "flash-backs"

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  39. Oh no! by Airconditioning · · Score: 1

    Welshy!! :(

  40. The slashdot community continues to fail to read by Braedley · · Score: 0

    Nowhere in the article does it say anything about the cremated remains falling back to Earth. I think Space.com just got it wrong. The article says that they can't find the rocket components, presumably for the experiments that were on board. In fact, I doubt that the mission would have been a success if the ashes returned to Earth, seeing as how it's assumed that when you say you want to be burried in space, your remains actually stay there for a decent amount of time.

  41. Star Trek XI? by cashman73 · · Score: 1
    Star Trek XI: The Search for Scotty?

    Shhhhhh! Don't Berman & Braga them any ideas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  42. Better than the alternative by steveha · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they are lost on Earth rather than being lost in space; the irony would have been terrible.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  43. This is too beautiful a setup... by chris_eineke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, Red Shirts wear (were) you!

    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    1. Re:This is too beautiful a setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cousin in London is a werewolf...
      and he wears a shirt...
      you incensitive slod!

  44. Good thing it didn't land on the Mexico border by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 1

    Good thing it didn't land on the Mexico border, otherwise it'd be hell deciding where to bury the survivors.

  45. I told you so! by purpleraison · · Score: 1

    I rub it in, but I predicted this when it was originally posted that they were doing this. Read my post here --> http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=232687 &cid=18920769

    --
    I am open source, and Linux baby!
  46. What else are you supposed to love by msimm · · Score: 1

    after their gone...not like that. Never mind.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  47. Wherefore != Where by necro2607 · · Score: 1

    OK. The word "wherefore" is equivalent to "why", not "where plus some old shakespeare stuff". Read this article for a quick explanation, or see here for a dictionary definition.

    1. Re:Wherefore != Where by A3gis · · Score: 1

      Damn, had that wrong for years then! Cheers!

    2. Re:Wherefore != Where by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wherefore didst thou never think to open a dictionary, before thou didst essay the use of a word that was so foreign to thy modern speech?

  48. Makes you understand by caffiend666 · · Score: 1

    Makes you understand why William Shatner refused a free flight on the maiden voyage of a Space Ship Two :) These guys jinxed themselves...

    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
  49. mulching by cathector · · Score: 1

    in some countries there's also the option of being mulched, which makes a lot of sense to me. fwiw, i had a brief email exchange a couple years ago w/ Susanne, mulching's Swedish flag-bearer, bemoaning the unavailability of mulching in the U.S., and she was very nice.

  50. Touch of the bubbly, Scotty? by ChrTssu · · Score: 1

    Given that they touched down in New Mexico, I think a glass of Gruet in their names is in order. To going boldly, friends.

    --
    I am not an animal! I am something worse!
    1. Re:Touch of the bubbly, Scotty? by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Nice! Someone else who actually knows about Gruet. I like buying the stuff because it's from my home turf and cheap for the level of quality. Plus I get a kick asking the staff at the wine store about it and watching them get excited.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  51. hurm by arse+maker · · Score: 1

    Well after the obligatory jokes.. It's a bit sad to think of someone's final resting place being lost then being the source of jokes. It seems fitting if he could have been shot off into space. The whole v'ger idea of floating space until something or other happens is pretty appealing. Especially if you reject modern religion and think of the universe in a more physics orientated sense, it's the only way you can really hope to live on beyond your life. Anyhow, that's all my sentimentality for the year :)

    1. Re:hurm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if you reject modern religion and think of the universe in a more physics orientated sense, it's the only way you can really hope to live on beyond your life.


      The only problem with living on beyond your life this way is YOU'RE DEAD ALREADY!!!! You aren't living beyond your life. That has no basis in physics whatsoever! And even if you reject modern religion, surely you understand that death has nothing to do with how long your remains exist. If that was the case, I suppose King Tut is still alive and kicking, eh?
    2. Re:hurm by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      It's not like it was his entire remains. They shot up only a fraction of his ashes. I'm certain there is plenty oof Mr. Doohan left to spread around...

  52. Think of the Environment!! by dazlari · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's just crazy. Here I was thinking he would be polluting space, crashing in to the ISS in 30years or so.

    Why o' why didn't they just fire him into the side of a nearby Mountain - it'd have saved on the Rocket fuel and thereby made a smaller environmental ... impact. :o/

  53. Quick! Check Vasquez Rocks! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Damn Gorn!

    Or was it the crazy dude from the antimatter universe with the space ship?

    Maybe it was those two ditzy rocker dudes in the telephone booth...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  54. Re:FUCK YOU SLASHDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gotta change my Threshold, I canna take it any more Capn'

  55. Appropriate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if they were wearing red shirts

  56. Scotty has the last laugh! by farrellj · · Score: 1

    "Landing party lost to..."

    - Unknown Alien Fungus
    - Hostile Natives
    - Salt Vampire
    - Spoon faced aliens
    - Bad TV ratings

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  57. There are logical reason to this by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Firstly, as far as I remmember you are not buried *foreever* in a cemetary, after a while (50 years?) you are remain get taken care of. Somebody in the caretaker industry stops me if I am wrong.

    Secondly imagine if people would get buried everywhere at the will of their family or their own will. Very quickly you would not be able to dig somewhere without finding half rotten remains, with all the infection danger that they represents. This would be a health catastrophe. So NO the reason you can't burry people whereever you want is not an industry lobby reason, actually most law on burrial I know of are from the 19th century and early 20th, and predate caretaker industry lobbying.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:There are logical reason to this by laron · · Score: 1

      I think one could combine the "graveyard" and "plant a tree" ideas. Imagine a traditional graveyard (maybe a bit spacier) with a young oak tree on every grave. After 100 years or so, you cut down the tree, digg out the roots and have a new hole right there for the next burial.
      And you would never lack wood for coffins.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:There are logical reason to this by khallow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt health problems would be an issue unless the person died of a communicable disease like cholera or polio. Of course, in the 19th and early 20th Century, that would have been a serious problem. OTOH, given the laws against desecration of human remains, being able to bury human remains just anywhere would be a huge obstacle to construction.

    3. Re:There are logical reason to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be quite a bit spacier.

      A grown tree would probably require at least 10x10m2 area (give or take a factor of 2 depending on type of tree)

    4. Re:There are logical reason to this by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

      Firstly, as far as I remmember you are not buried *foreever* in a cemetary, after a while (50 years?) you are remain get taken care of.
      Well, yeah. That's the way it works in Germany and Austria, but here in the U.S. we've got lots of land. Other countries have different traditions. Traditions, and their associated mythologies, are often rationalized to available resources.
      --
      Notmysig
  58. Possibly by Rix · · Score: 1

    But that's solvable simply by gathering more data points. It will converge on the location.

    I imagine the problem isn't so much getting to it's location, as finding a path to it. Simply heading in a straight line for an unknown distance isn't feasible.

    1. Re:Possibly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, by pretending having troubles to find it, they generate ton of publicity. I mean, they probably wouldn't find it if it landed right under their desk. In a few days, they'll make headlines by having found the ashes.

    2. Re:Possibly by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a few days, they'll make headlines by having found the ashes. ... if the Krikkit robots don't beat them to the punch, that is.
  59. I guess fate finally caught up with him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a red shirt on almost every episode without getting killed is tempting fate quite a bit.

  60. Not the Genesis project by Rix · · Score: 1

    Transparent aluminium.

  61. That's not the real reason by Rix · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's to keep them in the ground when the zombie apocalypse comes.

  62. He's dead Jim! by Madman · · Score: 1

    All the water in his body is gone!

  63. Scotty isn't lost... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    He just "went home".

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  64. No intelligent life out here by voislav98 · · Score: 1

    I guess a rant about the quality of engineers today is in order. Scotty could still teach them quite a bit about those impulse engines: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relics_(TNG_Episode)

  65. Lost in the Mountains.... by thewiz · · Score: 1

    Instead of Lost In Space.

    Whoda thunk it?

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  66. She's got a PATENT on it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder she bemoans the availability of mulching in the US.... she has a *patent* on it in 35 countries!! Don't believe me? Read http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/425822/614084, one of the articles your google search turned up.

    Imagine having a patent on burial or cremation. I'd bemoan whole countries not owing me royalties too!

  67. That's what you get ... by eck011219 · · Score: 1

    ... for being in a landing party with a Star Trek red shirt guy. They always lose those guys.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  68. It'll take them 48 hours to find the remains... by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    ...but since they don't have 48 hours, they'll do it in 12.

  69. How did he book the flight? by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    If only he had used Priceline.com he would not have had these troubles. (It pays to have friends in the right places!)

  70. If it was a test flight ... by shmigget · · Score: 1

    The article says the rocket was meant to reach suborbital flight and return and had no problems, so apparently this was a test flight, but if that's the case they why was it carrying real cargo instead of a test cargo? I mean, imagine if the rocket had exploded a few miles up, or had crashed in the ocean.

  71. Patience, Grasshopper by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I mean, in the beginning I thought the ashes of those people will be dispersed in space, which was very strong as a symbol and a ceremony, of sorts.

    Ah, that's just for the impatient. Scatter their ashes on the Earth and wait for our Sun to go nova - same result, longer latency, less fuel.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  72. Send Away Team by iridium_ionizer · · Score: 1

    This whole thing smacks of Star Trek III. I am sure that once we locate his remains we will find that he has been brought back to life by the Genesis project.

  73. I'm confused by default+luser · · Score: 1

    Were they supposed to bring the ashes down with the rocket? I thought the whole purpose of this flight was to take the ashes up into space and scatter them.

    Bring the ashes BACK? Sounds kinda bass-ackwards to me.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  74. Captain Kirk is screaming... by alshithead · · Score: 1

    Scotty, beam yourself up before it's too late!!!

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.