Slashdot Mirror
Spammer Robert Soloway Arrested
Mike writes "Yahoo is reporting that US prosecutors captured Robert Soloway, a prolific Internet marketer responsible so much junk e-mail they called him "Spam King." Soloway was arrested in Seattle, Washington, a week after being indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of identity theft, money laundering, and mail, wire, and e-mail fraud. Soloway is accused of using botnets to disguise where e-mail originated and of forging return addresses of real people or businesses for his mass mailings. If convicted as charged, Soloway will face a maximum sentence of more than 65 years in prison and a fine of 250,000 dollars."
..... make him delete all the spam emails he sent out, individually.
I can't decide, what do people think, 65 years is basically a life sentence. Is that excessive?
Minimum.
The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination
- Douglas Adams
Todo List:
[x] Eliminate SPAM From Internet
[ ] Bring peace to Middle East
[ ] Make $1,000,000,000
That's one less thing for me to do now...
-- www.globaltics.net
Political discussion for a new world
If convicted as charged, Soloway will face a minimum sentence of 1 year suspended, plus time served in county lockup, plus 40 hours community service. Or something useless like that.
When it comes right down to it, do you really have confidence that a judge and/or jury will impose 65 years of incarceration for sending penis pill emails? (Yes, I know there is more to the charges than that.) Kenneth Lay was only facing 20~30 years if he didn't appeal the judgement to a higher power.
[
ok, that's 1 down. 12,832 to go.
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
There's plenty of evidence around to nail Soloway for a long, long time.. but to be honest he's not even the worst spammer out there. I suspect the possibility of a plea bargain is quite likely, so that international law enforcement can get to the even bigger fish.
Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
Can we then arrest someone at Microsoft who was responsible for making it so easy to create bots? In my opinion, Windows (and thus Microsoft) is an equal partner in the generation of spam we get today.
I'm kidding about the arrest part but it sure would be nice if Microsoft was called into the spotlight and at least publicly embarrassed for it's key role in spam production. Enough so that even my mom and dad (who think Windows is great) understand the malfeasance done by Windows' pathetic security record.
and send them to his jail mates.
Hopefully, he'll get to find out if those penis enlargement schemes he helped deliver really worked.
I thought this was going to be about some robot arrested on the subway :(
How will I find out how to get my little blue pills at a discounted price now!!! OR what about how to gain another 1-2 inches!!!
This is truly a black day
Robert Soloway shot first.
For the same reason its illegal to fuck your children (or do anything else that illegal):
At one point, society felt disgusted about it. Enough so that laws are created to punish it.
HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
that I am in no way shape or form associated with Robert Soloway.
Is this the stiffest penalty a spammer has ever received?
Thank you. We now return you to your regular /. programming.
*65* years? That seems way over the top. Why can't laws just reflect some reason in the usa?
Yes, sure...he did more then just spam. But even murderers often come off with less then 65 years, so is spam, impersonating people, using botnets, etc. *really* worse than murdering people?
People should get a grip.
I'm all for laws against spam and all the rest of it, but hell, 5 years + a considerable fine is more than enough.
--- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
That spammers are the scum of the earth. They're criminals who should have been stopped long ago before they were allowed to get this devious.
Also those who buy from spammers are encouraging crime.
The reason this is a crime is because spam is not only annoying, but its a huge tax on network resources, from the bandwidth for sending it to the disk space to store it on servers.
That's not really a good example... Having sex with your children is harmful to them and the human race both, as it creates mental issues and greatly increases the possibility of genetic defects in offspring. I'd hardly say 'disgust' is the only reason that law exists.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
In this case it's about the illegal use of resources - botnets work by hacking PCs and using them to send mail via their Internet connections, which in most countries would be punishable under their equivalent of the UK Wireless Telegraphy Act (actually I think the 2006 revision changed that, but the principle is still there) irrespective of the content in the spam. Also, the vast percentage of spam promotes illegal or semi-illegal products or is a front for scams. Yes, anyone who responds to spam is a fool, but in the end, if they're conned out of anything than a crime has been committed somewhere.
... as much as the next guy but am I the only one that feels like the jail sentence is way too high & the fine way too low?
There is a war going on for your mind.
And THAT is the problem - reactionary responses from one issue to the next, never mind if they are based on logic or reason. The media hypes the most titillating stories to the point of makign the "problem" appear far worse than it is, society reacts like a herd of blathering sheep and politicians, afraid to lead with logic and reason that they may be removed from their lofty posts, bow down to their blatherings.
"At one point" society has felt disgusted about many things that are none of society's business.
This is why it's called the tyranny of the majority, my friend.
Not defending spammers (or baby rapists), but essentially calling any laws just and reasonable simply because "society put them there" is anathema to liberty. We were warned fo this hundreds of years ago, but the truth is that whole "logic and reason" thing really gets in the way of absolute government and corporate control, so few opportunities exist today to be reminded of such...
Every single person here has been affected by this guy - some more than others, but all negatively. This is not the time to turn the other cheek, because every time you deleted one of his emails, you were doing just that.
Now is the time for him to get the short/pointy end of the stick...the stick that he sharpened and used on all of us. He took time away from each of us that we will never get back. Talking about fair this or fair that in terms of years behind bars....are you serious? Wake up. This guy leached your life and given the opportunity, he would not hesitate to do it again.
It is only fair to take his time away from him until he has no more.
However, if you infringe on someone's copyright in the U.S. then your maximum fine is $250,000 per infringement not to mention a possible 5 year jail sentence as well.
Clearly spam's a problem, but not as big of a problem as Napster and Limewire - after all, the Spam King was making money and Napster was just giving away music!
Lesson: If you're going to be a nuisance to people and corporations, make sure you make lots of money doing it so your punishment isn't as severe for proving you're a good capitalistic American.
...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
I hate spam as much as the next guy. That being said, 65 years in jail and a quarter million in fines (even assuming he gets half of that) is just too much. This is the sort of sentence you should impose on murderers, not electronic irritants who use a system designed specifically to allow anyone to said pretty much anything to whoever they please. In short: hurt him, but not too much.
Why bother.
I sure hope that sentence is carried out, all of it. In fact I think torture should be leagalized for this. Can we call him a terrorist and transfer him to gitmo. Come on, you know McCain would agree.
And having issues with the size of your penis isn't harmful to a lot of men reading spam?
Well if you dont know maybe we should get Senator Ted 'Tubes' Stevens to give you some edumacation on the internet tubes. Because when they're clogged with ads for penis enlargement, breast enlargement and viagra it dont let your race horse or lottery bets go through.
09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
+2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
"Now I'm seriously serious!" - Serious Sam
In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.
The thing trolls don't get is that if the tubes are clogged with spam, there's not enough space left in said tubes for their trolls.
I fail to see how this is a flamebait. Sure, the opinion of the poster might not be the same as the opinion of the moderator, but it's definately not flamebait.
Seems more posts in this topic have been similarly moderated. Is this perhaps a sensitive subjects for some slashdot visitors?
Manuals are your last resort only
Comment removed based on user account deletion
My name is Fiveo Twoo Nineo, Barrister-at-law, practising in Nigeria. As you might know, the notorious Spam King was arrested recently. He left behind a sum of 25,000,000 USD in trust with me and since he is going to rot in jail for 65 years, I am planning to steal it with your help. Please contact me on learning about my plan to share 40% of that money with you.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
To the pain!
I suggest that he should get a good bunch of artifical spam mails everyday while only one of it contains the code for the daily meals. Thus he would experience what it's like to get V1AG|)_A and 03M Software offers every day ;)
[x] Eliminate SPAM From Internet
[ ] Bring peace to Middle East
[ ] Make $1,000,000,000 I can help you with that last one. You see, my uncle died recently and he was really rich, but I'm having some trouble getting the money out of the country.............. ...hold your breath. He won't be getting past item #2 on his list any time soon.
Only to idiots, are orders laws.
-- Henning von Tresckow
He should also have to pay for his incarceration.. at $40k/yr, his fine will only keep him in jail for about 6 years before you and me have to start paying for his life of luxury in a minimum security resort, complete with Cable TV and probably Internet Access. Hell, he'll probably just continue his business from prison.
On top of that fine, I want him to pay me 1.= for each mail I got from him.
Privacy is terrorism.
Why exactly? Because there are laws in placed against it. That's the only thing that makes ANYTHING a crime.
If you meant to ask why do people think spam is worth criminalizing, start over and try again.
I've seen proven rapists get less of a sentence than this man.
Pisses me off.
... I'd rather he received a $65 fine and 250,000 years in prison. That way, if he got a reduced sentence for good behaviour, he might still be in the big house for 125,000 years.
CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
"Soloway will face a maximum sentence of more than 65 years in prison and a fine of 250,000 dollars"
Honestly, I think this is one of the only places in US law where punishment is close to the crime. $250,000 fine? I don't think it's high ENOUGH, considering how many people this guy has (in)directly pissed off. But then, I can get the same damn fine for burning a DVD (but only 5 years in the slammer, but let's face it: once you're in, even when you get out you're fucked).
Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
How dare you judge me? I mean what are you? You think you're some kind of, like, angel here? No, you're just this penny-stealing... wanna-be criminal... man.
Yeah, well, that may be. But at least I never slept with Lumbergh.
A lot of people are talking about how 65 years seems like a lot. Perhaps, but 250k fine seems low. How much money did he make off his scamming? I got the impression that these types of activities are highly lucrative, so I hope the fines are proportional to his profits. It seems to me I keep hearing stories about companies making money off of some illegal practice, then getting fines that are less than the profit they made. Could that be the case here?
I am a successful internet entrepeneur, wrongly imprisoned by my corrupt government. I have been recommended to you by friends who trust greatly in your honor and discretion in my troubled time.
I have US$ 65 million in hidden accounts which I need to remove from the country. If you will aid me in this I will split half of it with you, in recognition of your good will and generosity.
To make the transfer I will need your name, social security number, address, bank routing number, account number, personal identification number and passwords. With these, I can move the money into your bank accounts.
Thank you,
Robert Soloway
The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
Sorry, but I doubt that. Despite all efforts, no one has found any gene or set of genes that causes criminal behavior. The best we can really say is that prisons seem to have a greater concentration of XYY males, however, the difference is much smaller than early reports claimed and the number of XYY males is still a small minority of inmates.
Perhaps you were just making generalizations. Let's be specific. If you look at a criminal and see that their parents were criminals, as were their grandparents, it's silly to claim that criminality is genetic. There is something much stronger that all of them share: They were raised by their parents. Being a criminal tends to put one in a situation where their children will not have receive the same social teaching as the rest of the world. Most criminals are not financially stable, and thus their children tend to be similarly financially unstable. Until anyone is able to find any sort of real correlation between any genotype and increased criminality, claiming that there is a genetic component is nothing more than an attempt to avoid the problem.
The point here: I think your "7/10th genetic" is actually "7/10th socio-economic". Of course, many people hate hearing that because it means that there are things that can be done to help. If it's genetic, you can just shrug and walk away. If it's socio-economic, it means that it can be fixed if you're willing to give up on a small portion of your greed. Better funding for police helps, but not as much as better funding for the public schools (which rich people everywhere hate... why invest in something that can't turn a profit?), public libraries, parks, art programs. That is your smart pill. It already exists, but its something that rich people have to be willing to pay for.
Considering Sanford Wallace was considered 'The Spam King' and now this guy was called 'The Spam King', all this looks like is someone new shall become The King.
Actually, the first thing I saw was the quarter million bucks threatened (not even a verdict yet, that's the MAXIMUM amount of money they might take from him), I nodded my head and realized I'm in the wrong biz.
250k bucks isn't even close to the damage he caused. And I'm not even talking about the poor morons that fell for the spam and actually ordered something. I mean companies that had to install spam filters and pay for them, I mean people who spend a good deal of their online time weeding out the junk. And if you are, like we are here, paying for every MB trickling through your line, you actually also have a direct financial blow, not just the "imaginary" loss of time, which not so few could also turn into money by working overtime.
I mean, be honest. How much time every day do you spend deleting spam? Probably not so much, being a geek you should have a good spam filter or it's time to return your geek membership card. How much time do you think the average Joe Clueless wastes that way? How much company time is being wasted every single day only in the US because people have to weed out spam because they HAVE TO read their mail, whether they want or not?
That's direct damage to your country's productivity.
250k bucks is laughable in comparison.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
they know what to do with people like him
I initially misread this as Spammer Robot.
Or, you can be like me and block most of the ip blocks in China. That reduces spam by about 60%. =)
[%] Cingular Ringtones
To whoever thinks that 65 years is a bit too much:
Think about time.
Think about the time you spend/spent 1) deleting spam, 2) writing rules to filter spam, 3) learning, writing, installing, configuring bayesian apps.
Add to that the time spent by your POP/IMAP/SMTP/Exchange server to receive spam and forward it to you the one that passed thru the aforementioned filters.
Think about the total time you spent dealing with spam, in one form or another.
Then multiply that time for all the people on Earth that face the same problem as you do - from simple users to ISP admins - and have to think and implement solutions - from "ignore and delete" to complex auto-training systems.
65 years suddenly appear a shard of a split second, compared to the total wasted time.
Don't drop the soap.... bitch.
Bear with me for a bit...
Every time a spam message gets through my filters, I suffer a brief twinge of irritation. I've been receiving spam in varying amounts since the mid-90s, and I wonder what the cumulative effect of all those little irritants would be.
I also wonder what the cumulative effect of the millions of people he spammed having those little irritations over the years would be. Spread over millions of people and several years it may not seem so bad, but the cumulative effect is that a wave of minor negativity washes over the planet when people like this guy send out spam. Sure it's not the great symbol odegra in a road system, but it's another thing that brings the general happiness of the planet down a jot.
Maybe the punishment should factor in the number of people he spammed, as a multiplier. Not one to one, but some multiplier.
It's probably a terrible idea, but then I'd extend anti-spam legislation to all advertising forms if I could. Billboards jostling for that last square centimetre of space seem just as bad as emails written by the mental giants who think that mis-spelling erectile drugs will make me more likely to buy them.
If there's that much organization involved, why not a RICO prosecution?
I'm always surprised that they go after these so-called "spam kings" as if they were committing their crimes in a vacuum without the help of other people or other institutions.
As much as spam seems linked to a much larger world of theft, fraud, money laundering, stock manipulation, and more well-known organized crime I would think that a RICO investigation would be a big help.
I would also think it would go a long way towards ending the tacit involvement of the legitimate financial and IT community in spam if a few well-placed execs in those industries got nailed along with the rest of them.
I don't know about everybody else, but some times, when I wake up in the morning, and open my inbox, I do get a little afraid.
--Edward Dassmesser
Does this mean I'll be getting less spam? Will there be any noticeable difference?
If sending unsolicited mail to someone is illegal, then the Government's monopoly on first class postal services (aka the US Post Office) should be indicted immediately !! So typical for government prosecutors to go after a guy making a living because what he does is unpopular, yet they reserve the right to fill my mail box full with totally worthless and unwanted (paper wasting as well) real world spam. If the State can't get its own house in order they got no business going after private citizens for the same crime they commit on a daily basis all over American. Oh wait i forget the laws don't apply to politicians or government sacred cows like the Post Office, just you and me, and innovative young men who fulfill a service that is evidently quite in demand and a very profitable business. Now if he has committed some kind of genuine fraud well then fine, he should go to jail for it, but if all this guy has done is send e-mail to people who did not "opt in" well tell me how i can Opt-out of the government monopoly mail service that keeps taking up so much room in my trash can ?
Normally by this time of day I have dozens of junk emails, but not today. If this scum-bag wasn't doing all of the spam, his arrest sure scared off the others.
Maybe it's just me, but imposing a fine on top of 65 years in prison is like slapping someone who just fell out of a hundred-story building.
he has no qualms about being the spam king. he is unrepentant. rehab?! you gotta be kidding. he does this out of greed. seize all his money and lock him up in a super max prison. screw this guy. he embodies the worst in human nature. it is all about personal accountability...which he does not have.
"You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
The spammer is not a danger to society, just a pain in the arse so an appropriate punishment is a small prison sentence, coupled with a phenomenal fine - e.g. 10 million dollars.
Well, what if there were 10000 that did exactly what he did. Would they be a danger to society? What if there were 1 Million people sending spam like him? Do we want to live in that kind of society?
I argue that if we don't want our society being like him, then he is a danger to society.
And why did it take years to get this guy? It was hardly a secret what he has been doing for so long now.
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
I'd like to point out that he was a indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of identity theft, money laundering, and mail, wire, and e-mail fraud. These are real crimes. He wasn't indicted for being a spammer. There's a HUGE difference. But make no doubt about it this is a bad person.
Additionally, he may get 10 to 20 and he'll serve more like 5 in a Federal Penitentiary (which is nicknamed "Camp Snoopy" for a reason). Trust me on this, he is not going to be excessively punished.
Get most of your mail online.
If someone wants to write to you badly enough, they will pony up the Fed Ex fee. Also, if you want to really make it more dificult, you can actually move to a location not served by the US mail, or really live out of hotels.
P.S. To the rest of the world this may seem a bit extreme, but to your (conclusions drawn from what you wrote) paranoid, government hating mind, it should sound pretty reasonable.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
I thought a maximum refered to an upper bound - how can more than 65 be a maximum?
I'm pretty amazed that no one else has pointed out the risk imposed by all those unmanned bots now up for grabs. Step #1 should certainly be forcing him to silently self-destruct them. But what are the chances our overlords thought of that? No, more likely they're in someone else's hands this very minute...
You can easily stop junk mail, but most people don't take the time nor diligence to do it. I have stopped all junk mail. If you want to stop receiving junk mail just do what is prescribed on this web site: http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs4-junk.htm. It works.
Also I receive no spam. This has been over 3 years. How? One I have my own email server and it's at its own domain. But more importantly I can create aliases any and all lists I join that are then forwarded to my real address. That way I can track down where the address is getting poached and/or sold. Then complain and delete that alias. I only give my real email to people I trust. I also make sure that it doesn't get on to any web pages. All of you people with FREE email accounts like gmail, hotmail, yahoo....well you get what you pay for.
This is how I'd like to see his prison term go down:
"So you're the Spam King, eh? Listen, I spent my rent money on those penis enlargement pills but I can't tell if it worked. Tell me if this feels very big to you."
why not bring him around to all computer users for a personal meet-and-greet?
drive him to the first one, use a wheelbarrow to take him to the second one, pour him in a bucket for the third one..........
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
To quote Alphonse Karr on the subject of abolishing the death penalty.
"I am all in favour of ending capital punishment but I would like to call upon our friends the murderers to take the first step."
Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
Everyone KNOWS all spam comes from China or Korea. His name is probably Robert So Lo Wei or something similar.
Well of course if the government charged 42 cents for each email spammers sent.....Spammer's would either (i) be broke (ii) be their best friend and named to the head of FEMA or something.
How do you staff the Bureau of Behavior Modification? The consequences for getting a bad apple in there scare the shit out of me. It's all well and good when wise and benevolent hypothetical people just like you or me are running it. But what happens when they're handpicked by Dick Cheney or Hillary Clinton or [insert favorite Machiavellian villain here]?
I'm not saying the prison system doesn't need an overhaul, nor that we shouldn't have a comprehensive sanity check on punishments relative to offenses and in relation to each other. I also get that sentencing is intrinsically intended -- at least in part -- to produce changes in the offender's future behavior.
When people say "behavior modification" though, they're not usually talking about aggregate studies of sentencing methods versus recidivism rates. They're usually talking about starting down a path that quite probably leads to Clockwork Orange crap down the road. Any power that you grant the government will eventually end up in the hands of people who don't share your political orientation or your ideas about what should and shouldn't constitute crimes. I don't know about you, but I would rather live with high crime rates than have a body of "reconditioning experts" become a fixture of our government.
Pi Ran Out
"To the pain" means the first thing you lose will be your router below the trunk cable, then your ISDN line below the plug, next your laptop and then your cpu. Your GMail account you keep and I'll tell you why, so that every bounced email of every victim at seeing your spam will be yours to cherish. Every sysadmin who weeps at your approach, every AOLamer who cries out "Dear God, what is that thing?" will show up in your perfect mailbox. That is what "to the pain" means. It means I leave you in anguish, wallowing in freakish email forever.
Weaselmancer
rediculous.
Do not delude yourself into thinking our Judicial system is designed to rehabilitate anyone. It's designed to make others out there too afraid to start a life of crime. And if that doesn't work, well, it's a holding pen. Making him delete a lot of email would, in theory, fit the crime, but really we want the hours back that he stole from us.
[Ego]out
When I was living in Sweden I got sick of all the unwanted junk I got in my mailbox. The first year I lived there I received four full paper bags worth of the junk. Fortunately I was pleasantly surprised that there was a solution to the problem. In most apartment buildings, the mailboxes are a slot in the main doors. All it took was a note above my mailbox stating "No advertisement, Please". If you have a note like that then no-one is allowed to "spam" you. Neither the Post office nor independent advertisers.
I wish that it was that easy with email spam.
This is great. Now who will be arrested for all of the junk mail in my real mailbox?
It's about time a spammer got nailed. I hope they give him lots of time to think about all those people he inconvenienced and ripped off.
I hope they donate his equipment to the needy after they stash him in clink-land.
Minus all that crap spam software he has on it.
By the way, my spam has significantly reduced. I'm almost able to go through my mail in about 3 hours instead of taking all day.
To opt-out of receiving snail junk mail check out http://www.junkbusters.com/junkmail.html.
The pricks should be delivered at the same rate as the spam was delivered.
NPR was saying 1 Million to 14Billion per day were various estimates.
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
Paranoid ? Tell me what exactly is paranoid about not wanting the US Post Office to shove pounds of unwanted paper a week into the tiny mail box they give us, and force us to use ? i mean really, what ever happened to door to door service anyway ? Privatize it yesterday !! I mean do we really think that UPS, and Fed Ex, can't deliver first class mail as well ? I guess i would be paranoid if i feared the mail man when he came, but of course he never comes to the door anymore. No I am not paranoid just pissed about yet another example of Government hypocrisy and lack of a real choice in the matter.
P.S. I don't hate the government, I just think its evil. I am in good company too btw. (Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Samuel Adams, Andrew Jackson, to name a few who thought government was a necessary evil at best)
of time from millions of people. If you were to add up all the individual charges for each incident of spamming, the total additive penalty would be well over life in prison. Yeah, he does belong in prison for life. Sentences are not just for the severity of crime, they are also for repetition and scale of the offense. Imagine this...if you took the total amount of suffering he has created, and concentrated it all into one single victim, how severe would that victim's torment be?
Newspapers will soon be reporting a strange phenomenon - parolees from a certain prison having unexplainably large penises and unexplainably firm erections, unexplainable bank accounts with millions of dollars, and unexplainably high-income jobs working from home for offshore employers.
-- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
Can we give him 65 years, please? For those who say murders and rapists get less, then let's all agree to a mandatory death penalty for rape and murder and then give him 65 years.
Make him give up every cent he got through spam to charities and as a condition of his probation/parole, don't allow him to own or use a PC.
1 - send him to the big house with the murderers
2 - millions in fines, so he is broke
3 - 900 years of jail time
4 - revoke all computer rights (see mitnik's great rehab)
5 - must reveal everything he has done, methods, techniques, botnets, programmers involved, etc.... with daily "discussions" with feds
someone who harms other people _because_ it benefits themselves; this is a flaw of character that cannot be changed. Put a bullet through his fucking brain.
If convicted as charged, Soloway will face a maximum sentence of more than 65 years in prison and a fine of 250,000 dollars.
... I guess it's a good thing he didn't murder anyone. He might have gotten a really stiff sentence.
But, damn
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
Make him write out by hand v1ag^ and c1al1$ the correct way once for every email he ever sent out with them spelt the wrong way... Or worse, make him actual _take_ the pills his has being trying to flog....while he is in prison of course....then either way the results will be just revenge... And invest all his money in all those exciting "sure thing" stocks...
One of the greatest practitioners of the spammer lifestyle ever just "happens" to be named the concatination of "Solo way"! I wonder how he got that Identity.
Well, I think there is a honest solution to the problem of such spammer.
:)
Let the judge give him a computer. And let that computer contain 20 000 000 e-mails. And let him delete all this spam while in prison. But that's not all. In these e-mails there will be 170 messages (some of them disguised as spam) deleting each of them means one year of imprisonment. That is - deleting all 170 would lead to 170-years term. So he should decide carefully which message to delete and which do not.
Once he is done, it's clear to see how many more years he have to be imprisoned. Isn't that a sort of smart solution?
Shut up ComicBookGuy, you've got a belly the size of mars and you know it.