Slashdot Mirror


Zune DRM Cracked

An anonymous reader noted that Zune Scene is reporting that the Zune DRM has been cracked with software now available that strips the DRM from Zune Marketplace tracks and those shared with WiFi.

232 comments

  1. Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It means someone bought a Zune.

    1. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by CSHARP123 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No wonder, They sold the sixth one now.

    2. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Ramble · · Score: 0

      I believe the songs shared by Wi-Fi arn't DRM encumbered at all. It's a hardware device inside of the Zune that determines when you should stop listening, not a software layer.

      --
      "Oh boy"
    3. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, it might even increase sales, which all goes to show how DRM isn't good for hardware sales.

    4. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Divebus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow. It took this long for someone to care.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    5. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by uncoveror · · Score: 3, Funny

      A lot of people bought Zunes as gifts for kids and grandkids. Old people believe slick salesmen who say "it is the same as an iPod." Both of the kids that didn't return their Zunes and buy an iPod should be happy the DRM has been cracked.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    6. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to keep digital media locked up in any format. I heard tell of a program that strips DRM off of tracks purchased from the Zune Marketplace, or traded via Wi-Fi. But what makes this more significant is the optional Zune subscription which allows users to download almost all the freaking Zune Marketplace.

    7. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by jelle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it might even increase sales, which all goes to show how DRM isn't good for hardware sales.

      Since DRM is about selling the customer _less_, how is it a surprise that DRM isn't good for sales?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    8. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Liquidrage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Shoot. I liked mine better then the iPod's at the time it was released.

      Not really sure why anyone would total diss it other then hype/marketing/backlash/etc.. It's not like iTunes was a DRM free happy land when the Zune was launched either.
      Interface was no worse then iPOD (seriously, I'd love to see someone that has actually used both try and claim the interface sucked or was somehow worse), storage for the price point was the same, Zune had bigger screen which was a feature I wanted since I use it for carrying around photos and listening to the radio as much as MP3's.

      It was a decent product, sales have been so-so but nothing special. But it just gets too much flask IMO because it's MS and not Apple.
      Hell, apple could probably launch a $600 phone with virtually no 3rd party apps and that can't even send pictures in text messages and people would probably buy it.

    9. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Locutus · · Score: 1

      my first thought was that Microsoft employees probably already has access to the unDRM'ed music so what's the big deal.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    10. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Locutus · · Score: 1
      But it just gets too much flask IMO"


      Now there's a use for the Zune. Make a flask out of it. For one, it's not going to grab any attention and a non-functioning screen can just be explained as 'it's a Microsoft product and just like the Xbox, it doesn't always work right'.


      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    11. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Ltar · · Score: 0

      true fact- I'm considering a zune, now. because Ipods don't have high enough capacity. The zune, then, with it's freshly nonesistant DRM, is something very attractive to me.

      This wasnt true before I read this headline. The Zune may be crap, but if you look at it as a screen, hard drive, and headphone jack, well... that's pretty handy.

    12. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by macslut · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You say that as if the iPod has been updated since the Zune came out. It hasn't. All that's really changed is that the Zune has dropped to almost $50 less than the 30GB iPod and people still aren't buying it. The Zune may have a bigger screen, but the iPod has a *better* screen. Of course the iPhone has an even better/bigger screen, but sticking with the iPod/Zune comparison, the interface for the Zune does suck compared to the iPod. Sorry, but a fake scroll-wheel doesn't cut it. It's even worse when you compare it to the full system (meaning desktop software).

    13. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Liquidrage · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I didn't say it as anything has changed.
      And seriously. You opinion on the interface was very convincing. It sucks because it sucks. What does it actually do worse.
      If you pick the thing up you can navigate through songs/albums/artists/media/etc very quickly and easily. Hence, it doesn't suck.
      Everyone's going to have a preference (though 90% of the ones I'm going to read about the zune I can rightfully dismiss as people that have no clue what their talking about). But I've yet to see the race between zune and iPod users finding music or using the device in other ways.
      Oh yeah, and the better screen. I guess the specs are arguable. But "better" in most cases is subjective. Never had a problem with my screen, and bigger is better on a device of similar size. It's easier for people to see pics of my dog/cat/wife/car/whatever on the zune then it would be on a comparable iPod. In fact, I really wanted to Zen Vision W, but it was just a tad too big to be carried around.

      But I know I know. Apple is great, MS sucks. Your statements were very thought out.

    14. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by mahlerfan999 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would a cracked Zune gush instead of squirt?

    15. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      And as soon as the went blind looking at the link in the article they dropped and broke it.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    16. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get paid much, you MS shill?

      I hope not.

    17. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by fluffman86 · · Score: 1

      I believe that the more important question is "does it work on linux now?"

      No, seriously. Does the Zune work on Linux, and will it work now that it's cracked?

    18. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Cracking a Zune is like cracking a turd.

    19. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Filter · · Score: 1

      Second.

      --

      "better ways of doing things eventually just replace the inferior things" - Linus Torvalds 09-08-07

    20. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by jcr · · Score: 1

      Make a flask out of it.

      Are you OK with a flask that leaks? I would consider that a major drawback.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    21. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by jcr · · Score: 1

      Care?

      I think you're reading a bit too much into this.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    22. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Liquidrage · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, heaven forbid anyone actually use the device. Or actually be able to describe what's not to like about it IN DETAIL.

      It's a rebranded Toshiba MP3 that is actually a very nice piece of hardware, the software ontop is just fine. The music store isn't a great, but outside of that it'll ignore DRM completely. Meaning like most MP3 players your stuff off of CD or other MP3/AAC(without DRM)/etc just plays no questions asked.
      It's fucking pathetic that people like you and the AC write crap like that because I like something. You guys are ignorant clowns and nothing more.

      Go actually use the device and then write something intelligent for a change.

    23. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by dintech · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe that the more important question is "will it blend?"

      Fixed...

    24. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      It doesn't leak, it Squirts. And it's a feature!

    25. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by hey! · · Score: 1

      Now there's a use for the Zune. Make a flask out of it.


      No, no, you missed out on a piece of highly sophisticated linguistic humor.

      You see, the word for "flask" in Italian is fiasco.
      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    26. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by jcr · · Score: 1

      Right, I couldn't remember Ballmer's clever, hip terminology for a moment there...

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    27. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, iTunes is a DRM-free happy land.

      It doesn't add DRM to your music, like WMP does, and like the Zune does.

      I repeat, THE IPOD AND ITUNES HAVE NO BUILT-IN DRM.

      Nobody is forcing you to buy from the iTunes Store.

    28. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      Actually, it might even increase sales, which all goes to show how DRM isn't good for hardware sales.

      iPod says, "Hi".
      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    29. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Now there's a use for the Zune. Make a flask out of it.

      Here's a better use for a Zune (especially if it's brown): Hollow it out and hide your iPod inside it.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    30. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by samjensen · · Score: 1

      dog/cat/wife/car/whatever You better cherish those pics of your wife. If she ever reads that comment you're through!
      --
      this space intentionally left blank
    31. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Why I diss the Zune.
      1. They hype. Yep you hype a product this much it better be good.
      2. Play for Sure... It doesn't. This is the thing that really ticks me off. Microsoft was pushing play for sure so you where not locked into one vendor for your music and or player! Here comes the Zune and it doesn't work!
      Thank you Microsoft.
      3. It is ugly. Sorry but this is a consumer device and it is ugly.
      4. Only one model. My wife has a Video iPod and I have a Nano. There is only one Zune.
      5. They pay the RIAA for every one sold! This is more of an ethical issue for me. I only put music I own and podcasts on my Nano. Why should I pay "Your going to steal music anyway tax" the creeps at the RIAA!
      6. WiFi. The WiFi is busted. You can not do a wireless sync with the Zune or buy music from a hot spot. What a waste of hardware.

      I am no big fan of the iPod but like windows it is the standard. If Rio had kept updating my Rio Karma I would have had no reason to buy an iPod.
      The Zune as far as I can tell isn't good enough to beat the iPod. Had Microsoft actually tried to make a product that was better for the user and not better for the record companies I might have bought it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    32. Re:Microsoft is thrilled by this news by Filter · · Score: 1

      The parent comment was directed at the poster and the stank of his his shillin'.

      Regarding your comment about the Zune player itself, I agree its a nice piece of hardware, there are hundreds of nice mp3 players if you are only looking at hardware. What good is nice hardware without good software. If it wasn't locked up hardware I could do something with it, since they won't let people who can write good software write good software for the device we have to depend on Microsoft's software; which you agree isn't that great.

      The apple hardware is likely not better than the Zune. They don't let you hack at it either, but no one seems to need to to enjoy it.

      --

      "better ways of doing things eventually just replace the inferior things" - Linus Torvalds 09-08-07

  2. At last... by darien · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the announcement that's been so desperately needed to kickstart Zune sales...

    1. Re:At last... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      This is the announcement that's been so desperately needed to kickstart Zune sales... Why? It's not like FairPlay hasn't been cracked for a while.
    2. Re:At last... by rob_squared · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not to fear, just like PlaysForSure, this will be patched by next week. After all, Microsoft does care about its real customers: Shareholders and Music Industry. http://www.schneier.com/essay-126.html

      --
      I don't get it.
    3. Re:At last... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to fear, just like PlaysForSure, this will be patched by next week.

      and probably the same way.

    4. Re:At last... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      You mean by releasing a new device that isn't compatible with the old music and expecting everyone to buy their music again?

      :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:At last... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to fear, just like PlaysForSure, this will be patched by next week.

      I get your point that MS was suddenly so quick to patch when their interests were at stake.

      But FairUse4WM still works to this day.
    6. Re:At last... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Microsoft does care about its real customers: Shareholders and Music Industry.

      I must take exception to your assertion that Microsoft cares about its shareholders. If that were the case, they'd have kicked Ballmer to the curb years ago.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:At last... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It's sad, there goes their one chance at actually having anyone want to buy the damn things.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Beyond Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone work so hard to take such a worthless device and make it completely priceless?

    Now I'm, like, tempted to go buy one of these brown bricks.

    1. Re:Beyond Me by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I guess it's the consensus around here that the Zune is a horrible piece of junk. The place I work bought some Zunes and some iPods and some other portable media players and I got a chance to take each home for a few weeks.

      I really kind of liked the Zune. To my surprise it wasnt' that ugly brown color. All my (non-DRM) music played just fine, and I even kind of liked the way the Zune sounded with a pair of the $40 JBL 210 reference ear pods. The videos played well and the interface was acceptable. Battery life was pretty good.

      I didn't try the wifi stuff, but the unit I tried compared nicely with the 30gig iPod.

      I'd never buy one myself because I make a concerted effort to avoid giving Microsoft my business, but it wasn't the horrible crap that I'd been led to believe by that group of people who only seem to post at Slashdot when the issue turns to something having to do with, or competing with, Apple. I have heard that if you look at those people out of the corner of your eye you only see a black silhouette of a dancing gen-Y'er with fake dreadlocks.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Beyond Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's attempt to enter the portable digital audio player market did not just need to compare favorably with the market leader (something that is rather easy to do when you can just copy what they are doing, operating system *cough* *cough*). The failed entry by Microsoft needed to be better than the market leader. Unfortunately, the most innovative thing I have seen come out of Microsoft in 3 years is the 3-D version of Apple's Expose feature MS added to Windows Vista. And that is just taking an existing feature someone else came up with and making it 3D (and requiring end-users to upgrade their video cards).

    3. Re:Beyond Me by Glytch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That pretty much matches what I've heard from a Zune owner. His gripe isn't with the player's interface or the hardware itself, but rather the deliberate crippling of the wifi and the horrible PC-side software.

    4. Re:Beyond Me by macdaddy357 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know why everyone keeps bashing the Zune. I love mine! It is the perfect size to shim up that old table in my den with a short leg.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    5. Re:Beyond Me by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you are incorrect. It's the consensus here that the Zune is a great piece of hardware. everyone agrees it has a fantastic screen awesome power and is overall a incredible device.....

      that was turned into a turd by the software that it runs. They took the decent software inside and then shoved DRM in by the heaploads. Making it a turd.

      That makes it the horribly piece of junk.

      Once it's cracked and a 3rd party firmware can be installed to run it, I'll be buying 2 or more of them. In it's current DRM and windows Locked state, nobody wants it.

      Microsoft catered so hard to the RIAA and MPAA organized crime families that they ruined the product.

      it's like the microsoft keyboards, they are actually awesome, but nobody would own one if they refused to type words or phrases that were on a banned list.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Beyond Me by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1

      but rather the deliberate crippling of the wifi and the horrible PC-side software. Well, it's Microsoft. Do you really expect software from them to not be awful and crippled?
      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    7. Re:Beyond Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's like the microsoft keyboards, they are actually awesome, but nobody would own one if they refused to type words or phrases that were on a banned list.
      Straying from the topic a bit... I have a Microsoft Digital Media Pro, and there's nothing "awesome" about this keyboard. The silvery finish quickly wore off, the letters faded, some keys get jammed. Not better than the non-brand chinese stuff that come at a fraction of its price. If you want a SERIOUS keyboard, go for an Unicomp or a Matias.
    8. Re:Beyond Me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      They were known for quality keyboards for a long time. I have three older Microsoft keyboards (a couple of years or so) and they are pretty awesome. Double-shot keys (i.e., the plastic lettering is molded all the way through the keycaps so it can't fade), fairly hefty, keys have a nice feel. Never had a problem with them.

      Sounds like Microsoft got cheap. Too bad.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Beyond Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reference ear pods for $40???? Reference ear pods goes for like $300 or more. Maybe you mean "default ear pods"
      (yes... I am european and here reference (insert audio equipment) means something used in a professional studio)

    10. Re:Beyond Me by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      If you want a SERIOUS keyboard, go for an Unicomp or a Matias.

      As a proud owner of a brand-new SpaceSaver from Unicomp, I have to agree. Worth every penny, though the postage cost me as much as the keyboard itself.

      Wouldn't know about characters fading, though; mine's a blank, like Das Keyboard.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    11. Re:Beyond Me by Source+Quench · · Score: 1

      What was with the larger delete key anyway? I had the misfortune to use a MS keyboard which had one on a daily basis, along side five or six others that featured a "normal" size delete key. I came to the conclusion that if you only used the MS keyboard for the rest of your life you would be fine with the new configuration - otherwise forget being able to touch type effectivley.

    12. Re:Beyond Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for someone to crack it too. It could be a nice player if you could get rockbox working on it. Imagine rockbox with wifi, wow.

    13. Re:Beyond Me by nine-times · · Score: 1
      I don't think most people think Zunes are completely horrible. I tried one, and it was fine. It's just that the thing has been plagued by bad marketing decisions that give a lot of ammo to make fun of it, and people who dislike Microsoft are making fun of it. Some examples:
      • after spending years trying to push their "playsforsure" DRM on every piece of media on earth, Microsoft releases an MP3 player that doesn't support it, but has its own special DRM
      • Microsoft tried to hype the Zune as an iPod killer, perhaps THE iPod killer, and then it fails to live up to the hype and is relatively unsuccessful
      • they chose to make 1 of their 4 color choices an ugly brown color
      • they include a feature as useful as WiFi hardware, but only allow it to be used for "squirting", making it somewhat useless
      • the "squirting" stuff only works if others have Zunes, making it somewhat useless
      • the "squirting" stuff has a DRM which doesn't allow much use of the music before it stops working, making it somewhat useless
      • the "squirting" is called "squirting"
      • pairing the term "squirt" with an ugly brown color tends to conjure the idea of diarrhea.

      I mean, really, MS made it an easy target for ridicule. Meanwhile people have a lot of reason to resent Microsoft. Why wouldn't you expect people to ridicule the Zune?

    14. Re:Beyond Me by dapsychous · · Score: 1

      I'm using a MS keyboard right now, and I tell you, it's a piece of really nice keyboard :)

      What the hell? That's not what I typed

    15. Re:Beyond Me by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      The Zune has no more DRM than does the iPod*, and you guys orgasm over the very mention of the word "iPod". Hypocrisy at its finest.

      * Save your breath regarding the Zune DRM'ing wifi-shared tracks, since iPod doesn't have wifi-sharing to begin with. And if MS didn't DRM wifi-shared tracks, it's be open season for pirates, and you guys *know* that. That would be death to the subscription model (Zune's store supports both purchases and subscriptions).

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    16. Re:Beyond Me by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The failed entry by Microsoft needed to be better than the market leader.
      When did Microsoft ever put out a product that was better than the market leader?
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  4. And yet... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one cares. Breaking AACS, iTunes, or even CSS was a big (albeit inevitable) deal, but I suspect most of us just shrug this story off for one simple reason--Microsoft, with its ill-thought-out strategy of expanding into every conceivable market at once, at whim, and with no controlling strategy has made itself an irrelevant bit player in multiple markets.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    1. Re:And yet... by AusIV · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This strikes me as somewhat different than breaking AACS, FairPlay, or CSS. If you bought something restricted by one of those formats, it's plausible you want to remove the DRM so you can play it on a platform that is technically capable of playing it, and restricted solely by the DRM. You've paid for the media, and you want to play it on another platform.


      The difference with the Zune's DRM is that it effectively allows music "rentals" through WiFi sharing. People can "squirt" each other a song then remove the DRM, effectively getting the song for free. Not much different than pirating off of p2p networks, but it does mean Microsoft has created an incredibly effective piracy device.

      For the rest, I agree. Microsoft has tried to over expand, making itself irrelevant in quite a few markets. In the process, they've half-assed their position in their original market, alienating a lot of customers. I've had several more technical friends switch to Linux, and less technical friends switch to Macs in the time since MS has started focusing more on running everything than making a solid OS. Microsoft needs to seriously reconsider their priorities if they want to avoid becoming irrelevant in all of their markets.

    2. Re:And yet... by EMeta · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "...since MS has started focusing more on running everything than making a solid OS."

      What is this magical, mystical time period you're talking about where making a solid OS was a successful MS priority? '99-'02? Hadn't they already started with the branching then? (e.g., MSN?)

    3. Re:And yet... by AusIV · · Score: 1

      What is this magical, mystical time period you're talking about where making a solid OS was a successful MS priority?

      I knew somebody was going to point that out. I don't really think Microsoft was ever as focused as they should have been on making a solid OS, even when that was their only goal. In more recent years, I've been wondering why on Earth MS is trying to compete in a certain field.

      MSN was the beginning of Microsoft over-expanding. Then trying to compete with Google in search has always struck me as ridiculous - Microsoft has very little to gain by running a search engine, and I've never understood why they feel it necessary to compete in that field.

      Then there's the browser wars. Rather than comply with standards, Microsoft tried to set their own standards and dominate the market with them. Admittedly, if MS had been able to maintain its position as the de facto standard in web browsing, and stray far enough from established standards, they could have sold Windows to people because it was the only OS that supported the only browser that displayed pages on the internet properly, but this is exactly the problem - rather than try and create a solid OS, they've looked for ways to lock customers into Windows.

      The Zune is another example. Microsoft saw Apple being successful with the iPod. I have no idea why they created the Zune. I don't know if they expected it to be profitable, or if they simply wanted to stick it to Apple, but it's clearly been far from successful.

      In short, you're right - MS has never focused enough on making a good OS. I'm just thinking that if they don't narrow their focus in the near future, they're going to keep losing ground in all of their markets.

    4. Re:And yet... by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but this is exactly the problem - rather than try and create a solid OS, they've looked for ways to lock customers into Windows.
      Afaict microsofts main profit centers are windows desktop and office. MS therefore ttries to crush anything that threatens those products. Maybe this is a bad strategy long term but the stock market only really cares about the short term.

      Looked at in this light IE (particularlly free IE) and MSN are reaction to netscape and googles threats to make the desktop OS irrelvent. The XBOX line is a reaction to sonys attempts to expand games consoles into the tasks of desktop PCs. The zune is a reaction to apples highly popular iPod/iTunes which give PC users a taster of the Mac.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, stripping the DRM off a WMA file still leaves you with a WMA file. It's like stripping the peanuts off a turd; you're still left with a turd and you can't use the peanuts.

    6. Re:And yet... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      If this is the alternative to car analogies, I'll stick with the cars, thankyouverymuch.

      Oh, wait we're talking about WMA. Please accept my apologies.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    7. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSN was the beginning of Microsoft over-expanding. Then trying to compete with Google in search has always struck me as ridiculous - Microsoft has very little to gain by running a search engine, and I've never understood why they feel it necessary to compete in that field.
      ----

      Well, why make Linux to compete with Windows is the same stupid question. Be happy that there are still companies who try to compete with Apple (iPod - ewww what an ugly device) and Google.

    8. Re:And yet... by ardle · · Score: 1

      The reason why Microsoft haven't focussed "enough" on making a good OS is that software products are only one way of making money.

      Microsoft's primary function isn't to produce software, it's to make money. Lots of it - lots of businesses and pension funds depend on it.

      I think we may find that, as soon as MS have got as much money as they can from the entertainment biz, they'll ditch em and go where the money is - downloads.

    9. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can "squirt" each other a song then remove the DRM, effectively getting the song for free. Not much different than pirating off of p2p networks

      Actually it's more like if I made you a mixtape, if I "squirt" you my playlist (you still can't go around grabbing files off my player willy nilly). Or it's like if I lend you a CD and you make a copy 'cause you like it. Funny that you compare it to piracy, because as far as I ever knew that stuff is perfectly legal.

    10. Re:And yet... by ProfM · · Score: 1

      but it does mean Microsoft has created an incredibly effective piracy device.

      And RIAA's lawyers are set to go in 3 .... 2 .... 1 ....

      Just as a side note ... who's lawyers are better? MS or RIAA?

    11. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft was forced to "half-ass" their position in the OS market by the USA and European Union governments.

    12. Re:And yet... by domatic · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, that I think 2000 is a solid OS. It is the easiest MS OS to make lean, mean, and stable. I can have a patched, drivered, and misc-utilitied install of 2000 come in around 200 MB. It could be pared down a bit leaner but I do like having things like putty and unarchivers ready. I don't know if it was MS' priority to create a lean featured solid OS but after XP and now Vista, I've come to appreciate it more. Incidentally, I see lean-featured as a feature in itself. Like FireFox used to be, have it come with a minimum of crap that can break and then just add the things you want.

    13. Re:And yet... by lysse · · Score: 1

      What is this magical, mystical time period you're talking about where making a solid OS was a successful MS priority?

      When was MS-DOS 3.30 released, again...?
    14. Re:And yet... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Um, no it's not. When you buy a CD, the only person with permission to listen to the music is the owner of the CD. The only way what you describe would be legal would be if I then refused to give back the CD (and you had no other copies)

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    15. Re:And yet... by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Windows is a solid OS.
      It's so bloated and uses so much memory it would sink like a stone...

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    16. Re:And yet... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I think the point of the browser wars was to somehow make FrontPage and IIS the only valid options for creating and serving web pages.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    17. Re:And yet... by Repton · · Score: 1

      1985--1989?

      (oh, wait, you said "successful")

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    18. Re:And yet... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      If I had to go into modern times, NT3.5(1) would get my vote. NT was built for business, and then the marketing types got a hold of it and complained that the games weren't fast enough. Everything went to hell from there. Otherwise there were several iteration of MS-DOS which were solid.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  5. Cool. by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, I'm still not buying one. I have an old iPod from a few years back, and it still runs wonderfully. I see no reason to go out and arbitrarily spend money on a toy (a Microsoft toy, no less) when I don't need it and my old hardware still works fine.

    --
    ~ C.
    1. Re:Cool. by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I've had my iRiver H10 for over 2 years, just replaced the battery on it and never had an issue with DRM. It also has one crucial feature I haven't seen in another MP3 player: it records FM radio. I work in radio, so it's nice to be able to aircheck on the fly.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    2. Re:Cool. by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
      Fuckin' unAmerican pinkos like you make me sick. Go back to Russia, Comrade!

      Oh wait, wrong decade. You're letting the terrorists win!

  6. Alright! by LordKaT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can listen to music that I didn't buy for the media player I didn't purchase on an MP3 player that I don't possess!

    Isn't technology awesome?

    1. Re:Alright! by LordKaT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I swear to god, it's impossible to tell a fucking joke to a geek.

    2. Re:Alright! by cmdrpaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously, how are they supposed to know what "fucking" is?

    3. Re:Alright! by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's no geek, that's the grammar checker in MS Word.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Alright! by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      Damn, I was about to reply to his post with a comment stating something to the effect of, "In before an AC makes the generic defensive idiot nerd comeback of telling you your joke wasn't funny." It seems to be an all too common example of geeky sour grapes that if one didn't get the joke, it's not his fault because it wasn't funny.

      I'd just like to point out that this is totally fallacious, as being able to get a joke has absolutely nothing to do with its inherent humor content.

      So, a message to those humorless readers whose closest experience to making a joke involves removing their pants: Just take your licks. You only embarrass yourself further when you walk away in a huff mumbling "wasn't funny anyway" like a pissy little kid.

    5. Re:Alright! by LordKaT · · Score: 1

      Are you offering to host?

    6. Re:Alright! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot ladies and gentleman.
      Isn't that lady and gentlemen?
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    7. Re:Alright! by Basehart · · Score: 1

      OK Lords and Ladies, don't get your knickers in a twist.

  7. Microsoft is not to blame by acidrain · · Score: 1

    You cant blame Microsoft. This crack was a really long time coming all things considered. I guess if it was more popular somebody might have cared to crack it sooner. I still think congratulations are in order for surviving this long. Also, even if buying a Zune seems somewhat silly, this provides an interesting statistic on the ongoing failures of DRM.

    --
    -- http://thegirlorthecar.com funny dating game for guys
    1. Re:Microsoft is not to blame by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 1

      "You cant blame Microsoft. This crack was a really long time coming all things considered. I guess if it was more popular somebody might have cared to crack it sooner. I still think congratulations are in order for surviving this long." Talk about spin! Woot!

      --
      Karma Schmarma
  8. Is Secure DRM Possible? by TheEmptySet · · Score: 0

    So all of this DRM is horribly implemented and cracked quickly. Does anyone know at least theoretically if there is a way to implement DRM which is inherently secure (at least up to the cracking of, say, RSA encryption)? i.e. what might we be up against?

    1. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In a word, No.

      The problem with DRM, in a nutshell, is that you ultimately have to provide the keys for accessing the content to the end user. All DRM, no matter how it's designed, is at the most basic level just security through obscurity. Since decryption keys have to be provided to the end user it's just a matter of time before one of the (potentially) millions of users worldwide manages to find those keys and figure out how to make use of them. Companies spend more and more on trying to restrict access to those keys, and now to revoke compromised keys (think AACS), but even that's a losing battle. Companies spend tons of money and some teenaged hacker in Russia still manages to crack the encryption fairly quickly. It's a no-win battle for the companies. They just haven't admitted defeat yet.

    2. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      It's even more simple than that. If one person can write it another will crack it. No piece of code is unbreakable, some just take longer than others. None of these companies are going to spend the kind of money that NSA does on this issue.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    3. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because even the NSA can't do DRM. It's theoretically impossible

    4. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by EMeta · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there is another option. if you can force your uses to connect to yourservers before they can use your product, you can have new keys developed (and restricted) much faster than they can be hacked. WoW does not have a piracy problem.

    5. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, it is possible. It only has to be built into hardware and old all-purpose boxes need to retire. New computers (if MS and other giants' plans succeed) will just not allow you to hack anything.

    6. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      But this is just another layer of security through obscurity. I've seen some anti-DRM tools that simply intercept the connection attempts to DRM servers and return back seemingly valid responses. They can revoke all the keys they want on their servers but if the connection to the server is intercepted and a bogus ACK is sent back instead then the DRM is defeated yet again.

      As far as key revocation goes, I think the guys over at Doom9 have shown that the AACS attempts at this are lacking as well. They've been able to publish new keys within 24 hours of them being released by the AACS license authority. It takes a lot more effort for the AACSLA to revoke old keys and publish new ones than it does the hackers to uncover the new keys.

    7. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      I ment the codebreaking and secre cryptography that they work on 24/7.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    8. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you have to look at the reason the media companies use DRM of one sort or another. And that's because it works. Yes, they'll always be cracked sooner or later. However, that means nothing in terms of raw sales because the vast majority of your customers will never be aware of that fact, or too afraid to try it, or too technically inept to find the tools and use them. So far as those people are concerned, your DRM scheme is perfect because they'll never, ever manage to get around it, even if they wanted to.

      CSS was cracked years ago, and now tools to copy DVDs are readily available: just Google "DVD Shrink" for one example. That being the case, why do virtually all commercial DVDs have CSS still on them? Because it raises the bar high enough so that only a relative few will be able to manipulate that data in a manner not of the studio's choosing. That's just as true today as it was before DVD Jon came along and shook the applecart.

      DRM is like most things: it doesn't have to be perfect, it only needs to be good enough. The RIAA learned that lesson after decades of focusing on the control of "digitally perfect copies". They were shocked at the popularity of Napster and early MP3 rips, because those rips were anything but perfect. They were, however, good enough for a heck of a lot of people. That fact cuts both ways.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by cnettel · · Score: 1
      No, there is still a difference. Something created by man can be incredibly hard to really break, like most public-private key systems when handled properly. DRM is fundamentally broken. Something that is possible is to keep the actual key in hardware and even never let it leave a single chip. All communication to that chip can be done with encryption secured in another manner. If you make key-sniffing off the bus impossible, and make sure to keep the leakage and heat characteristics of the chip non-informative, you have a pretty secure solution.

      But, still, it's not as simple as that they don't have the same resources that NSA do to throw at the problem. The real issue is that the problem they try to solve is fundamentally harder.

    10. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily true... properly-implemented public key cryptography is pretty close to unbreakable. Read up on it here. The problem with DRM is that all of the keys necessary to view the content are by definition in the possession of the user. Once the user has all of the keys, it is just a matter of time before the unencrypted content can be extracted. It does not matter if you mail out little encrypted cards, require a dial-in, etc... in the end if the user can see the content, they can copy it - though perhaps not without modifying the hardware (even if only through firmware).

      If it weren't for the DMCA, DRM would be completely useless... but now that it is illegal to crack the DRM all of the activity must stay underground or outside of countries with DMCA-like legislation.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by StCredZero · · Score: 1

      When that becomes widespread, then someone will start building 'fake' hardware. In fact, this hardware will probably be an emulator running on top of a general purpose computer.

    12. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you're talking about. Read Foundations of Cryptography by Oded Goldreich; don't spread your thoughts on the subject until you know what you're talking about.

    13. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless, of course, that is deemed a felony. I guess someone will think twice if he faces 10 years in prison. And corporations can buy such a law.

    14. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there is another option. if you can force your uses to connect to yourservers before they can use your product, you can have new keys developed (and restricted) much faster than they can be hacked. WoW does not have a piracy problem.
      Your analogy doesn't work. Online games are unpirateable because they are interactive, and require constant access to the server. Media files are different. Regardless of how the keys are stored or transmitted, the user's software needs to be able to send decrypted bits to the sound and video drivers. If nothing else, it will always be possible to copy them at that level. Being able to get a DRM-stripped copy in the original format is a neat trick, but not necessary.
      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    15. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      But this is just another layer of security through obscurity. I've seen some anti-DRM tools that simply intercept the connection attempts to DRM servers and return back seemingly valid responses. They can revoke all the keys they want on their servers but if the connection to the server is intercepted and a bogus ACK is sent back instead then the DRM is defeated yet again.
      That works until they start using SSL cert pairs, or any other public key encryption method. Then you're back to slogging through with a debugger, and trying to figure out where the heavily-obscured public key is, so you can replace it.
      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    16. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

      Completely different issue. The value in WoW lies in the server and interactive content, not in the playback of recorded media.

      Nothing prevents you from recording your WoW session.

      --
      I lost my sig.
    17. Re:Is Secure DRM Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, and it's even more simple. For DRM music to play on any speaker or headphone, it must be converted to an analog signal that can then be recorded by another device.

  9. Breach of Their Contract by blankaBrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recall Steve Jobs claiming back in February that if iTunes Fairplay was cracked, they were under contract with the Record Labels to repair the crack within something like 24 hours. He used this as a reason why Apple couldn't license Fairplay to third-parties. Do you think M$ has a similar agreement? Maybe the Labels will have to wait until Patch Tuesday.

    1. Re:Breach of Their Contract by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is Microsoft. They may or may not have that type of deal, but you can be sure that this will be patched within a day or so. Now if this was a security vulnerability, say, in the Wifi that replaced all photos with goatse and replaced all music with a file that plays "hey everybody, I'm looking at gay porno" at the maximum volume, users would be lucky if they had a patch out by the next patch Tuesday. It would likely take a few months for them to get around to it.

      Flaws in the DRM have a higher priority than security flaws.

  10. Look here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  11. It doesn't solve the problem by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We hardcore and tech savvy users usually crack, mod or unlock any device we got ours hand into (Ipods, cell phones, DVD Players, Apple TV, etc) but it doesn't solve Six pack Joe's DRM problems. He will get a Zune, won't bother or know how to crack it and play along MS and MAFIAA's rules.
    The same thing will happen with our parents and most people. The solution is buying products that are open and DRM free in the first place.

    1. Re:It doesn't solve the problem by Idaho · · Score: 1

      it doesn't solve Six pack Joe's DRM problems. He will get a Zune, won't bother or know how to crack it


      Wait, what?

      Surely you meant he'd get an iPod. If he'd gotten a Zune, Joe Sixpack likely wouldn't even be able to succesfully install the software..., never mind get to the point of actually downloading any songs.
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    2. Re:It doesn't solve the problem by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      ...it doesn't solve Six pack Joe's DRM problems. He will get a Zune, won't bother or know how to crack it and play along MS and MAFIAA's rules.

      Six Pack Joe with a Zune doesn't care about DRM (if he did he wouldn't have purchased a Zune, now would he?). Six Pack Joe assumes that DRM is the way things are, and accepts it because his music player is not the center of his universe. Like it or not, this is the way the majority of the public feels.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:It doesn't solve the problem by dc29A · · Score: 1

      We hardcore and tech savvy users usually crack, mod or unlock any device we got ours hand into (Ipods, cell phones, DVD Players, Apple TV, etc) but it doesn't solve Six pack Joe's DRM problems. He will get a Zune, won't bother or know how to crack it and play along MS and MAFIAA's rules.
      The same thing will happen with our parents and most people. The solution is buying products that are open and DRM free in the first place. I don't think it happens to our parents and friends. My friends and family know I am tech savvy. They always ask me for advice about buying different things, using software and whatnot. The result is almost 100% Firefox usage, my mother and sister are on Ubuntu, they use Google docs with Open Office, my friends avoid DRM ridden hardware or software. I did show my sister how to rip CDs in mp3, how to burn CDs, even how to download stuff she wants. She is happy with some random hardware mp3 player without any Apple or MS DRM.

      We the tech savvy can influence our friends and family and educate them about the wrongs of DRM and lock ins. And it works (well, it worked for me!).
    4. Re:It doesn't solve the problem by BFaucet · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the GP2X? Runs on linux, designed to be easily developed for, plays MP3, OGG, WMA as well as several video formats. Has TV-out, USB and runs several emulators as well as homebrew and commercial games.

      http://www.gp2x.co.uk/

      I'm thinking about getting one.

      --
      -Derick
  12. Marketshare and cracking by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For years now we've been hearing that Mac OS X is less vulnerable to viruses and cracking because it has a far smaller marketshare than Windows. The argument is that nobody bothers with OS X because of the smaller marketshare. Although Zune DRM is being cracked for a different purpose, it does make me wonder if marketshare is much of a factor in decisions regarding which systems crackers attempt to defeat.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Marketshare and cracking by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      I actually believe that Zune was an opportunity for someone to get attention. Since no one cared to crack it(looking at you DVD jon), it gave someone else the opportunity to show off. Regardless, it is good because when m$ discontinues the Zune, the people who bought music will still be able to play it.

    2. Re:Marketshare and cracking by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Crackers will crack whatever exists. The kiddies might be obsessed with popularity, but the real genius crackers merely hunger for the challenge. They don't do it for money (or pussy lol), they do it because they can.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    3. Re:Marketshare and cracking by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think so. That may have been the case when 10.0 or 10.1 came out, but at this point Macs are more common. Combined with the perception of security (and the Apple ads touting such), the Mac is a very nice target. If someone was able to make a good Mac virus that didn't require security authentication or other such things, they could get a lot of press (and probably a very easy shot at a good position in computer security). I'm sure there are plenty of people trying.

      The Zune took so long because most people don't care. The average consumer doesn't care (or doesn't know that they should), and they bought an iPod anyway. The average techie (who does care) either bought an iPod, or probably doesn't buy DRMed music. Doing this is an interesting challenge, but it doesn't have the motivation behind it of cracking the DRM on the largest selling player and music store.

      The market share thing for OS X is a myth. It's not perfect, but it is more secure by design than XP (Vista was supposed to improve that, I don't know how good a job it really did, I haven't looked). The Zune just wasn't a very temping target, so this took a while.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Marketshare and cracking by SEMW · · Score: 1

      No. The cracking of the Zune was done because people wanted to get fair use out of their own music players / don't like arbitary DRM. It will have been done by people who own Zunes; if you have a Zune, you won't be focussing your attention on iPods just because they have a much larger market share -- you want fair use out of the player you own.

      Things like viruses / malware, on the other hand, are (sadly) these days done for almost entirely commercial reasons: zombifying machines to act as spam relays servers, or in the case of spyware, gathering info on a users browsing habits and using it to serve up adverts to them directly. In those situations, you clearly want to target the group with the larget market share because you'll get more money on your time investment.

      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    5. Re:Marketshare and cracking by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      DRM cracking is a very different thing than cracking servers, viruses, trojans, etc. DRM is inherently flawed because you have to provide the keys to the encryption so that the end user can read the data. Even if the NSA developed a DRM system it'd be fairly easy to crack since they'd have to give you the keys as well.

      Windows is so damned insecure and targeted by viruses, trojans, etc. because of it's poor design. The argument that Windows is attacked the most because of market share is absurd. Windows was, and still is, designed mainly on an architecture that wasn't designed for network use. Microsoft has also refused to rebuild Windows from the ground up in a more secure model because it would adversely impact the vast majority of Windows applications that rely on the inherent insecurity of the OS. If you take a well designed OS like Open BSD or OS X (which is based on BSD) and install applications that have been shown to be highly secure (like Apache) then it's extremely difficult to crack.

      If Windows wasn't the dominant operating system in the world then problems with viruses, trojans, and even spam, wouldn't be anywhere near as prevalent as they are. I've seen Windows computers become fully compromised simply by visiting a compromised website in Internet Explorer despite the fact that virus scanners, firewalls, etc. were all installed on the Windows computer. That's virtually impossible to do on OS's like BSD, OS X, linux, etc. as long as basic security practices are used (basically logging in as an unprivileged user and not root). I've NEVER seen a linux, BSD, or OS X computer infected with malware the way Windows computers are, and I've worked with literally thousands of these computers. True, you might occasionally see a *nix box that has some level of compromise, but it's almost never as bad as what can happen to a Windows computer by simply connecting it to the internet.

    6. Re:Marketshare and cracking by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      They don't do it for money (or pussy lol),... "Buy a Zune, get a free hooker" would have solved any DRM-cracking worries. When will they learn...
      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    7. Re:Marketshare and cracking by RonnyJ · · Score: 1

      It could also be that the Zune DRM was chosen because of Microsoft's enormous marketshare in the computer industry, not the portable audio market. Regardless of the individual product concerned, some people are going to be more motivated to crack something if it's made by Microsoft.

    8. Re:Marketshare and cracking by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      for years you have been listening to FUD.

      OSX, linux,solaris and other unixes don't have as many viruses and problems because of HOW THEY ARE DESIGNED. it's not easy for a rogue program to elevate it's privileges to superuser like windows does. Nor does any other OS encourage the user to run as administrator all the time like windows does.

      Windows and DOS has ZERO security to it compared to everything else. If in a unix box I run an app that wants to install files in the system area, I have to give it admin privileges or run it as admin. windows allows anything run by the user free reign over the c:/windows root as well as the registry and even the ntldr.exe file.

      THAT is the reason, absolutely everything else is 100% pure unadulterated FUD. popularity means nothing, how incredibly easy it is to own a windows box means everything.

      Until nobody runs the older insecure Windows OS's like XP and older this will continue to be.

      It is a solid fact that it is far FAR easier to write a rogue app to run with superuser priviliges on a windows machine than any other Operating system. Yes you can exploit buffer overflows on any OS, but windows leaves the door open with the keys in the lock on 98% of all installs.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Marketshare and cracking by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      They don't do it for money (or pussy lol)

      I guess that's it for me, then. It was nice, guys, but I guess it's time to move on.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    10. Re:Marketshare and cracking by firesyde424 · · Score: 1

      The "average" techie would never have bought an iPod in the first place, instead, opting to buy an MP3 player without the Apple brand that had better features and more space for a lower price. Why iPods are so popular is a mystery to me. Sometimes it seems like Steve Jobs could sell sand in the middle of a desert by putting an "i" in front of it, and it would be the biggest thing since rain.

    11. Re:Marketshare and cracking by domatic · · Score: 1

      The iPods are fashionable if nothing else and anyone who buys it will get good industrial design for their money. iPods also have the accessories market locked up and there is also the iTunes store to think about. That said, I use $45 two gig flash player. It is nothing to write home about but it does have the cool feature of lasting two weeks on an ordinary AAA battery and it mounts and is loaded with music as though it were an ordinary flash drive. iTunes is UI nirvana for many but it just grates on my nerves. I find just dragging the music I want on and off the player to be far friendlier. If I were inclined to spend more on a player, I'd still insist on the ability to file-manage my music.

    12. Re:Marketshare and cracking by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      additionally... .exe files are executable by default on windows... AS well as .exe .bat .pif .scr if i create virus.sh in linux using kate or if i download it from the internet i have to MAKE it executable... this produces much more security...

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    13. Re:Marketshare and cracking by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Just a point. Just one point. With an ipod, you can just drag music on and off. You do have to do it with itunes, but you just select 'manually manage my songs and playlists' and you're good to go. You can even drag mp3 straight out of explorer straight into your ipod.

      Show me the 60Gb MP3 player that's cheaper than an ipod and just as small, and I would probably have bought it.

      Lasting 2 weeks on a single AAA is impressive though. That's 2 weeks of continuous play I presume ;-)

    14. Re:Marketshare and cracking by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

      If someone was able to make a good Mac virus


      Viruses are no longer common. People who exploit systems today do it for profit. The days of some kid sitting in his room and cracking Windows are over. That kid is either cracking DRM (and there are oh so many targets, from the iPhone to the TiVo) or getting paid to run spam zombies.

      My Linux box encountered some 100,000 dictionary-based SSH attacks per day before I disabled password authentication. Run a packet sniffer on a public network some time. You may be surprised with what you see.

      it is more secure by design than XP


      In some ways, absolutely. Windows XP's "everyone as root" approach sucked, and we all knew that it sucked.

      But time and time again when I look at Macs, I see a system just begging to be exploited. What's to stop a malicious application from modifying one of the system utilities (yes, you can write to them without elevating)? And, considering that the OS doesn't bother to look at signatures before elevating, how do you know that your utilities haven't been tampered with? How do you know that the software you downloaded came from the source you thought it came from?

      Vista has some very, very smart features that make it much more difficult to exploit. IE, for example, runs in a lower-privilege sandbox that can't even write to most of your home directory (just the history/cache directories). Vista checks signatures on executables after they are downloaded and every time they elevate (I can be pretty damn sure that the Firefox updater really did come from Mozilla, and that it hasn't been tampered with). Vista changes firewall settings based on what network you are connected to (and, by default, blocks all incoming connections). It displays elevation dialogs on a separate desktop that doesn't accept input from normal applications. It randomizes the address space to make buffer-overrun attacks more difficult. It can encrypt the entire volume. It supports smartcard based authentication out of the box using Active Directory.

      I'm not claiming that "features" make a secure OS. But there's nothing inherent to Mac OS X that makes it more secure than Vista or Linux.
    15. Re:Marketshare and cracking by domatic · · Score: 1

      That's true but iTunes is still required. The music is stored in a hidden directory with names like "AVGBS". I want to move the music on or off with nothing more than a filemanager. Third party utilities help with this brain damage if the files are well-tagged but it just isn't something I want to bother with. The iPod also becomes slaved to particular copy of iTunes (and another copy will insist on full erase before you can use it elsewhere!?!?). This is also a misfeature as far as I am concerned.

      I understand that the way the iPod works is more than acceptable for many people but these things make it not acceptable for me.

      I'm sure you knew what I meant but the "two weeks" is "two weeks of domatic's typical use". The actual run-time is somewhere north of 10 hours. The player is otherwise quite plasticky, cheap, and nasty but it does work acceptably for me in ways iPods don't.

    16. Re:Marketshare and cracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, selecting 'manually manage my songs and playlists' causes the iPod to not be 'slaved' to one copy of iTunes.

      Any person's iTunes will be able to add songs to your iPod, unless you let iTunes manage your music for you. Most people don't.

    17. Re:Marketshare and cracking by domatic · · Score: 1

      I'll grant you that then. But I still find that the system fights me and wants me to work it's way rather than my way. Another man's pleasure is my poison and all that. iTunes+iPod+Store is designed to be an integrated ensemble. I can understand that it is genuine and desirable for many. I simply prefer more generic and generalizable tools for my music (and data in general).

    18. Re:Marketshare and cracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, fair enough. Thanks for the reply. (it's so sad that I almost never post while logged-in, simply for fear of being labeled a fanboy, when in fact I simply wish to have a reasoned discussion)

      For me, iTunes+iPod have worked very well without ever purchasing a song from the store. I use this iPod with 2 different Macs and 1 Windows machine, all with iTunes, using music from eMusic, a few tracks from Allofmp3, and a good many songs ripped from my CDs.

      As well, I have never had an issue accessing the files stored on the iPod under Linux, using amarok or another iPod-friendly OSS app.

      I completely understand how some people want their music player to show their music library as a browseable file system. That's fine, each to his own, and I can definitely understand how that would be useful.

  13. Once again, the hordes bring it down by strredwolf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yep, Slashdotted. Time to use the Coral cache again...

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Once again, the hordes bring it down by DarkJC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All that effort to make a post and you didn't even bother making it semi-useful by including a link..

  14. The link to FairUse4WM for Vista and Zune by Zune-Online.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are the links to the FairUse4WM :

    FileSend
    zUpload
    Files-Upload
    zShare
    QuickSharing
    SendSpace
    ShareBee

    MD5 hash 0d5eaa7f8010e1293221a320943adb7e
    Via:
    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=127943

    --
    -- Zune-Online.com Share your Zune Experience!
    1. Re:The link to FairUse4WM for Vista and Zune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel terrible for you, as you seem to have jumped in feet-first to the social. You know, the social that only you and one other person in your state are a part of?

      Oh well, I hope you're getting at least a few ad views on your site.

  15. Nice try Microsoft by Statecraftsman · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, cracking your own DRM won't allow you to reach your Zune sales goals either.

    1. Re:Nice try Microsoft by Statecraftsman · · Score: 1

      I also cannot believe there's such a thing as a Zune scene.

    2. Re:Nice try Microsoft by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      It's even more unbelievable than http://dellrumors.com/

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Nice try Microsoft by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Hey, c'mon! They're sponsoring hep barbecues!

  16. Piracy by Dr.+Zed · · Score: 5, Informative

    You miss the point. Because the Zune can network with other Zune, this now means that people have a way to pirate songs over a network.

    Oh, wait. Never mind.

    1. Re:Piracy by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Even weirder, can Microsoft be sued for providing a device that can be used to circumvent DRM?

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    2. Re:Piracy by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ..this now means that people have a way to pirate songs over a network.

      That doesn't make sense. Why would they pirate anything if they can copy it for free?

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Piracy by JonathanR · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...with other Zune The flaw in your argument...
    4. Re:Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, Microsoft markets itself as a savior to the music industry; a real bastion of DRM. Look how well that worked!

      The 'softies have really been drinking their own Kool Aid. Music player + WIFI, "protected" by DRM? What could possibly go wrong?

      All they need now is a custom-built P2P application to exploit the whole situation. In a few weeks the Zune becomes about as "protected" as the Cue Cat.

  17. Re:Great, another set of morons. by telemart73 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, you are quite a "genious."

  18. oh no! by friedman101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DRM exists entirely for the protection of the RIAA, not Microsoft. This will only increase the popularity of the Zune. An mp3 player that can share files over wifi with no restrictions, sign me up. I can't see Microsoft being too proactive about locking down the DRM again.

    1. Re:oh no! by SEMW · · Score: 1

      DRM exists entirely for the protection of the RIAA, not Microsoft. This will only increase the popularity of the Zune. An mp3 player that can share files over wifi with no restrictions, sign me up. I can't see Microsoft being too proactive about locking down the DRM again. Oh, certainly -- until a pair of RIAA exectives sidle up to Steve Ballmer in a few weeks time, asking how he'd feel about all tracks under the Universal and Sony labels being immediately and unilaterally withdrawn from the Zune marketplace. Upon which, sadly, MS will inevitably jump back into line ahead of the tip of the RIAA's whip, and back to full antipiracy proactive mode before you can say "DevelopersDevelopersDevelopers!"...
      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    2. Re:oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. DRM may be for the benefit of content provider, but there is a difference between Apple and Microsoft approaches. Apple realized that DRM was a requirement to start a download business, but they also realizes that DRM is the wrong approach and restrict media use by paying customers while leaving copyright infringers to have more freedom with their media. To that end, they endorsed a DRM system in iTunes Store, but at the same time using their position as number one in the download business to keep the price down and to try and get the labels to ditch DRM. OTOH, Microsoft also realizes that DRM was a requirement but they want to be the gatekeeper. They want to license their DRM so that labels pay them to gain control of how consumers use the media. Because of this, it is very much in the interest of Microsoft to prove that their DRM works as advertised. They can't be the gatekeeper if the fence has big holes.

      Don't get me wrong, both Apple and Microsoft are in the business of making money, but Apple's interests partially coincide with the customers' interests while Microsoft's interests is with the labels.

  19. All Six Zune Users.... by Timtimes · · Score: 0

    ....simultaneously wet themselves. Enjoy.

    --
    This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
  20. Told you so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A guy from Microsoft came to my school to give a talk about working for the company. It turns out that he was on the DRM team, which prompted a lot of jeers from the audience. Before his presentation got underway we had an exchange about DRM. My position was and still is that, "while I'm not fundamentally opposed to DRM, I just don't think it will work". He tried to argue with me, but I guess I was right after all.

  21. Error in Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those songs transmitted on WIFI are not shared but squirted. Obviously this was written by people that never used a Zune.

  22. It might by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this mean I'll be able to play my Microsoft PlaysForSure tracks on my Microsoft Zune now?

  23. Its a ZUNE though. Who cares? IT uses WMP .. eww! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    As much as i hate Itunes, its actually a nice program (just programmed like complete shit on the PC) But anyways... the Windows Media Player is HORRIBLE. It mangled all of my music and i had to do all my tags. I do like WMP's ability to show the controls on task bar though. Other than that.. i'm not a fan of WMP right now. Eww yuck..

    Oh yeah DRM cracked? Who didnt see that coming? DRM is dead. Its a stupid idea to rally your share holders around. The real truth is, the people have spoken and we dont want DRM and we will avoid buying wherever possible and there will be brilliant digital equivalents to George Washington, that will crack all of this nonsense.

  24. Good news, if of limited use... by Crimson+Wing · · Score: 1

    Well, if I ever can't find a specific song, say, using Ares Galaxy, and have to look in the Zune Marketplace, now I'll be able to clean the DRM off of it.

    Probably never need it, but I suppose it's good to have the ability.



    ...Yes, this means I'm one of those people who actually bought a Zune. I love the thing. No, I did not get a brown one. The brown makes it look too much like a friggin' candy bar made out of-- well, you know.

    --
    Sig? What's that? Oh, 'signature'...and it's supposed to be witty? Right...
    1. Re:Good news, if of limited use... by wkitchen · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, I did not get a brown one. The brown makes it look too much like a friggin' candy bar made out of-- well, you know.
      Chocolate?
    2. Re:Good news, if of limited use... by Crimson+Wing · · Score: 1

      Chocolate? Uh, yeah, that's totally what I was gonna say...{shifty eyes}
      --
      Sig? What's that? Oh, 'signature'...and it's supposed to be witty? Right...
  25. Could someone clarify? by mattgreen · · Score: 1

    Parent comment directly contradicts the groupthink that no one bought a Zune, and no one ever will. So, which is it? Is the Zune going to be bought, or is it going to tank?

    1. Re:Could someone clarify? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      So, which is it? Is the Zune going to be bought, or is it going to tank?

      He's talking about the poor Joe Six Packs who got a Zune for Christmas because the iPod was sold out.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  26. Re:Its a ZUNE though. Who cares? IT uses WMP .. ew by joshzweig · · Score: 1

    I heard it uses even shittier specialized Zune-Ware That doesn't work with the Zune...

  27. Old News.... by EmotionToilet · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The Zune is yesterdays trash... Now tell me more about the iPhone!!! It seems I am addicted and the methadone the clinic gave me, which I've been shooting up, doesn't seem to be controlling my cravings! *scratches myself obsessively as though there are little bugs crawling under my skin*

    1. Re:Old News.... by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'll have to snort instead of shooting up, but this might help. And it comes with a free blender.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
  28. And yet...Customers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well no one cares because this audience hasn't bought a Zune and never would even if there never was any DRM. That's how deep hatred goes.

  29. Re:Great, another set of morons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes, "chosing" between PNG and JPEG isn't really that hard.

  30. Re:Potter is thrilled by this news by jb.cancer · · Score: 1

    Harry marries Ginny and has three kids. Ron marries Hermione. Snape becomes headmaster. Tonks and Lupin have a child. Draco lives, gets married, has a child named Scorpius. Neville becomes herbology teacher. The scar had not pained Harry for nineteen years. All was well. Everyone lives happily ever after. Yes. yes. we (@/.) get it. will you move onto BBC next, pleeease?
  31. Not if you want the end user to ever hear the song by alohatiger · · Score: 1

    If there's a way for the user to hear the song (or otherwise use the content) there's a way for the DRM to get cracked.

    --
    Bigtime Consulting - "We're the best because we cost the most"
  32. Anyone emailed them yet? by NitroWolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has anyone emailed the 4 people who own Zunes yet and let them know?

    I think two of them were non-techies, so they may not know.

  33. one word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apache.

  34. DRM is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DRM is like buying a new car (or any locked item) and they send the car, the keys, and a valet. You can't get in without the valet, and he keeps the keys. Then they want to arrest you for firing the valet or figuring out how to hop in the other side and lift the key out of his back pocket while he's turned.

  35. Re:Its a ZUNE though. Who cares? IT uses WMP .. ew by dhazard · · Score: 2, Informative

    "the Windows Media Player is HORRIBLE. It mangled all of my music and i had to do all my tags. "
    You can turn this off. Its just as easy as it is in iTunes, which mangles all your music as well by default.

  36. Mac OSX virus is no challenge at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If someone was able to make a good Mac virus that didn't require security authentication or other such things, they could get a lot of press (and probably a very easy shot at a good position in computer security). I'm sure there are plenty of people trying."

    -- It's called Word Macro Virus 97. And yes, it was around well before Mac OS X.

  37. um... by naoursla · · Score: 0

    Sharing a song via WiFi doesn't add DRM so what are they doing exactly to strip it away?

  38. You probably have daltonism. by melted · · Score: 1

    I think zune's color is best described as "turd brown covered with snot green". Seriously, I think brown zunes are a practical joke to just see if people will buy it better after every single exec from Microsoft said that "brown is the new black". To measure the gullibility so to speak.

  39. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm supprised it lasted so long. M$ must have hired a outside help to design this time.

    Bruce Schneier once quiped "Trying to make DRM secure is like trying to make water not wet" ie.
    it's ultimate exercise in futility any ways you think of it.

    ac.

  40. Big and Old Con that Never has Worked. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Actually, it might even increase sales, which all goes to show how DRM isn't good for hardware sales.

    I doubt anyone will buy a Zune over this. A few might but it's just as big a con as the "get paid for sharing pirated music" story next to it. The bait is that you will use some kind of M$ subscription to build a music collection, then liberate it. The problems are that WMA is shit and M$ will break it. The same scheme has been available for previous generations of Windoze DRM players and all of them have been dismal flops. There are far cheaper and easier ways to build a music collection than buying a Zune. People's aversion to rented music is so great that they would rather buy CDs than risk the same money on a scheme that may or may not work. Shame on M$ for promoting behavior they claim to abhor.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Big and Old Con that Never has Worked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People's aversion to rented music is so great that they would rather buy CDs than risk the same money on a scheme that may or may not work. Shame on M$ for promoting behavior they claim to abhor."

      What about the music you "rent" from iTunes. Every which way you look there is a trap. We all simply just need to choose which evil suits us.

    2. Re:Big and Old Con that Never has Worked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I used to keep a server in my basement with my music collection on it. I would use it to listen from work. This, of course meant that I had to keep my backups current, my server available and running 24x7, and I had to keep paying for new music. I gladly paid $14/month to Yahoo. I get access to all the same music I had before on my home system, but I can listen from work without having to worry about my home system. I probably save the $14/month in my electric bill since I now only turn on the machine in my basement when I am working on it for some reason. I also get new music this way at no additional cost, and it plays just fine in my Creative Zen Vision:M with no additional steps, just drag and drop the files and I'm good. Personally I don't see why your bitching.

    3. Re:Big and Old Con that Never has Worked. by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      What about the music you "rent" from iTunes.
      What do you mean by that? There is no subscription fee for the iTMS, nor is there any other kind of recurring charge. How, exactly, is that "renting"?
      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
  41. Not entirely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Zune's protection is so good it's used to protect iPod's too!: http://hideapod.com/

  42. Like all digital restrictions, it's a con. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    The difference with the Zune's DRM is that it effectively allows music "rentals" through WiFi sharing. People can "squirt" each other a song then remove the DRM, effectively getting the song for free. Not much different than pirating off of p2p networks, but it does mean Microsoft has created an incredibly effective piracy device.

    A 20 foot radius sharing device is more effective than the internet? You might as well just carry a USB drive and swap that way.

    This is a con as old as M$'s involvement in digital music players that has yet to sell players. Do you know anyone who's gotten their rented music out of a Dell Jukebox or any other "Plays for Sure" player? I don't. At the same time I do know people who have programs that share their iPod by wireless and P2P offers anyone whatever they want if they don't just go and get legal, free music.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  43. Marketshare is not the big problem with Windows by argent · · Score: 1

    For years now we've been hearing that Mac OS X is less vulnerable to viruses and cracking because it has a far smaller marketshare than Windows.

    No.

    OS X is less vulnerable because its components expose a much smaller surface area to attack.

    OS X is attacked less often because it has a smaller marketshare.

    These are both in OSX favor, but it's the first that is the really important one. Yes, black hats preferentially target the more popular platform. But they don't *exclusively* target it... if that were the major factor in OS X relative security then you would expect it to have *fewer* active viruses in the wild... but not so near to zero that you can basically ignore them.

    What's an example of the kind of component I'm talking about?

    Between 1997 and 1998 the virus problem on Windows went from an annoyance to a disaster. Up to then Windows was a lot more like OS X today than Windows today... or even Windows in 2000. Up to then the typical user had been pretty much safe from malware so long as they did not download dodgy software from BBSes or online archives.

    Windows market share did not also increase thousands of times over that period... but something did change, and that was the surface area exposed to attack. In particular, what was originally called "Active Desktop" created a whole new *kind* of attack, because it was actually designed to allow web pages (and anything else that used the HTML control, including mail messages) to install and run native Windows plugins through a mechanism called ActiveX.

    Oh, yes, they have all kinds of checks to keep it from happening when you don't want it to, but the fact that it's possible at all was something unique to Windows and IE.

    It's that kind of design, one that is much more common in Windows than anywhere else, that makes Windows so uniquely attractive to attackers. It's not just that Windows is everywhere... it leaves the key under the mat as well.

  44. yay by artifex2004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll bet Zune owners are celebrating with a circle-squirt.

    1. Re:yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, all 4 of the world's Zune buyers would be more of a square than a circle....

    2. Re:yay by Mathness · · Score: 1

      Eeeewww, Zunekake.

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
  45. I choose option C by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    What about the music you "rent" from iTunes. Every which way you look there is a trap. We all simply just need to choose which evil suits us.


    Hmm, seeing as I choose neither the Microsoft-based evil or the Apple-based evil, if we're all choosing whichever evil suits us I guess mine is piracy? (Honestly what I tend to do is download music, then if I like it I go out and buy it in vinyl; some crazy-cool record companies are even offering free mp3 downloads with vinyl purchases, if one wants to do things entirely the "legit" way). But honestly I don't think you have to choose an evil that suits you . . . there are other choices out there besides evil! Don't act like people have to use the iTMS and the only small alternative is the Zune store or something.

    (Personally my own caveat is that I like-to-the-point-of-need things in lossless, and hell, we have the storage nowadays so there's no excuse . . . much of my music is in FLAC, and it actually pains my ears to hear things from iTMS).
    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    1. Re:I choose option C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I like-to-the-point-of-need things in lossless

      if I like it I go out and buy it in vinyl

      Hmm, vinyl and lossless. Anyone else see what I'm getting at?

      ostentatious /stntes, -tn-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[os-ten-tey-shuhs, -tuhn-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
      -adjective 1. characterized by or given to pretentious or conspicuous show in an attempt to impress others: an ostentatious dresser.
      2. (of actions, manner, qualities exhibited, etc.) intended to attract notice: Lady Bountiful's ostentatious charity.
  46. A bit of MSN history... by ebbomega · · Score: 1

    MSN wasn't to compete with google, or yahoo, or any of the search engines. It was originally a pointless little frontend for dialup connectivity and eventually became a full-fledged browser to compete with AOL. The browser also combined with the Hotmail interface for e-mail when MS acquired that. Later versions it became an actual e-mail client using a microsoft-based protocol. The search engine feature was common for just about any browser-based Dialup ISP (like AOL). Notice how similar MSN Messenger is similar to AIM? Wonder where they got that idea from.

    It wasn't until Microsoft began the MSN AdCenter project which launched last year and had been in development for maybe a year or two prior, that they were actually directly competing with Google's adSense business model.

    At any rate, around '02-04 Microsoft did a lot of kicking and screaming about operating systems. This was when the Longhorn propaganda machine was in effect. Lots of shouting about how they were actually paying attention to security, overhauling the whole Windows project from scratch, releasing Server 2003... Oh, and this was about when they gave SCO a whole bunch of money, and soon after SCO sues IBM for putting nonexistant proprietary code into linux, thus casting FUD upon all the linux community. I remember back then, Ballmer was throwing chairs around the office when someone would mention linux rather than Google. Microsoft's shift of competition focus in recent years is probably one of the main reasons rumours spawned up a couple years back about Google putting out its own OS.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  47. Now all we need is somebody with a Zune... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    If Zune DRM strips for free, imagine what it would do for a dollar.

    Zune, zune, zune!

    1. Re:Now all we need is somebody with a Zune... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If Zune DRM strips for free, imagine what it would do for a dollar."

      ummm... give it to Universal Music?

    2. Re:Now all we need is somebody with a Zune... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "If Zune DRM strips for free, imagine what it would do for a dollar."

      It would probably suck for a buck.
      No, wait... it already sucks for free!

  48. DRM = proprietary software = stress by funkdancer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    After nearly losing it (!!!) over trying to get my wife's Nano updated with new songs under Vista, Redchair's Anapod explorer dropping the synch every so often, I just decided it wasn't worth the agony and the stress. The whole situation just really started to get under my skin.

    So went out and bought two 4gb Samsung K3s. Beautiful piece of hardware, and as long as you stay away from the included software, completely DRM free. Synchs beautifully with WMP, which will convert my lossless CD rips to 192kbps versions. Or I could just drop suitable WMA or MP3 files straight into the folder structure.

    [angry rant]
    Not having to stress out battling the proprietary DRM solutions in Apple's players will give me a longer life, I'm sure. So yeah, just f*#k DRM, give me players I can just use like I want any day. As long as I'm not allowed to use legitimately purchased music any way I see fit, you'll never see me pay $$$ for downloads. As long as CD can still be ripped, I'll continue buying those - and copying to my car, HTPC, work PC, home PC and portable players as I bloody well see fit. I paid for my music, now let me use it. Anyway, when it is so much easier to just torrent an album than get set up with a commercial DRM provider, they really are kidding themselves about how they're dealing with the whole piracy issue.
    [/angry rant]

    --
    ISO certified == THX certified
    1. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      actually I like my zen vision m- you can drag and drop to it as a windows mobile device- and if you use the bundled S/W (not the update)it gives you an explorer extension that seems to be more stable in transferring off of the device- also it supports xvid and divx which is a big plus

    2. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm confused. itunes allows you to rip your own music and store them on your ipod.

      you decided it's too proprietary. yet, you used windows media player (that's not proprietary?) and load WMA (again, proprietary?) and MP3 (proprietary, really..) files onto your new player.

      how's that different from using itunes, ripping into AAC/MP3/WAV or AIFF/Apple Lossless, and syncing with the player. oh, you complained about "Redchair's Anapod" and problems with the nano. i don't see how exactly you can blame apple, the ipod nano, DRM, or proprietary software aside from anapod.

      /sandisk user screwed by microsoft =T

    3. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      You know, if you simply used the software provided with the iPod, I bet you wouldn't have had so many problems. (Havn't run it under Vista though, so just an assumption) You know, the software that lets you import music files or rip directly from CD, then synch with the iPod. (All without any DRM)

      But Apple sucks. They need to make sure their devices work with POS software that random people put on the internet, right?

    4. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Try iTunes. It's what came with the iPod.

      It's DRM-free as well.

      'Redchair's Anapod Explorer'? Are you fucked in the head? Why would you use a hack like that before iTunes?

      Oh, and about

      the proprietary DRM solutions in Apple's players
      ?

      Apple's hardware players don't have any proprietary DRM solutions in them.

      I repeat, THE IPOD AND ITUNES HAVE NO BUILT-IN DRM.

      They work fine (great, actually) without ever adding a file from the iTunes Store, and have no inherent DRM.

      Whoever scared you away from iTunes really did a good FUD job.
    5. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After nearly losing it (!!!) over trying to get my wife's Nano updated with new songs under Vista, Redchair's Anapod explorer dropping the synch every so often, I just decided it wasn't worth the agony and the stress. The whole situation just really started to get under my skin.

      Maybe you should think twice about using beta software if you don't like dealing with those sorts of problems?

    6. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by funkdancer · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I like your highlight. :)

      Well, with my new found ability to just drag and drop my music files without having to use proprietary software (itunes) - I it works well with whatever O/S I like. This is the way it should be.

      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
    7. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by funkdancer · · Score: 1

      Redchair's Anapod Explorer'? Are you fucked in the head? Why would you use a hack like that before iTunes?


      So iTunes under Windows is not a hack? HAHAHAHA

      Every time you hook up an iPod on a new machine iTunes wipes its contents. I cannot copy its files to a new machine. I have to use iTunes to get any content onto it. It will not play back files I just drag and drop. Maybe it's not all DRM related in the strictest sense, but it certainly is proprietary.

      Redchair's stuff used to work wonderfully but then it stopped working. It could very well have been the hardware failing; it certainly wouldn't be the first time.

      Apple's customer service is notoriously crap yet they've obviously got their fanbois sticking up for them [i.e. modding down my post]. With the awesome experience I've had going to one of their competitors, I can't find any logic reason to purchase one. I will certainly never recommend buying an iPod to anyone I know.
      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
    8. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by funkdancer · · Score: 1

      Well, I refuse to run iTunes as I find it to be one of the worst written Windows applications I've ever used. Starting with how it'll wipe a "foreign player" when connected. Anapod explorer is an awesome product and worked very well until the player started crapping out on me.

      It could be hardware related, it could be driver related. I don't really care what the cause is any more, I've written off the Nano fully and completely by buying the two new Samsungs - one for me, one for the missus = no more issues, gone are the tissues. :)

      I can use my WinXP desktop, Linux box or whatever to update music - and move its data any way I like. This is the way it should be.

      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
    9. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      It stopped 'wiping foreign players' a couple revisions back. Now, it synchs from iPod to PC.

    10. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you hook up an iPod on a new machine iTunes wipes its contents.

      You mean that particular iPod is set to autosync (on another machine).

      If you choose to manage your iPod manually, as most do, you can add songs from any computer running a copy of iTunes.
    11. Re:DRM = proprietary software = stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're using Windows and you're complaining about something being 'proprietary'?

      You fail it.

  49. The main thing wrong with the Zune by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    The main thing wrong with the Zune was it was too expensive.

    The iPod is the iPod. Love it or hate it. But there is an entire group of industries that have sprung up around it for cases, speakers, car adapters, microphones, software, so that when you buy an iPod, you have your choice of "stuff".

    Along comes the Zune. It's kinda like the iPod, a little bit more Soviet looking, but for consumers, kinda the same. Except no comparable infrastructure like the iPod. So you're pioneer, but with no upside, because at best, even if the Zune took off, you'd be right where the iPod is today.

    So Microsoft had to come in and blow away the iPod on price. Except it was the same price, with no options for a lower/entry level (i.e. $100) model.

    So rationally, who would buy this thing, except by accident. Microsoft needed to price this thing at $199, routinely discounted to $150. It's just funny to me that in a company that probably has more MBA's than all of Wharton and Harvard combined that nobody saw this fatal flaw. And really, the Zune has bombed so badly that they've dug themselves a hole in terms of perception.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:The main thing wrong with the Zune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      long comes the Zune. It's kinda like the iPod, a little bit more Soviet looking

      In Soviet Russia, Zune listens to you! ...sorry.
    2. Re:The main thing wrong with the Zune by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. Also, the marketing was awful. It was like iPod x2 hipness factor crammed down my throat. Welcome to the social complete with overly hipp people jamming on their zune.

      If I wanted an "in" thing, or something that was to be my "media center" is was right out. Though combined with a 360 I found it amusing if nothing else.
      But when I was looking to upgrade my rio to something that did images music and radio, it was a good buy IMO and still worthwhile since it does what I want it to do well.

  50. Piracy - the *other* way to grow market share by Torodung · · Score: 1

    This is exactly the good news that could make the Zune take off. I wouldn't be surprised if the Zune division leaked the cracks into the marketplace itself to try to make the player more popular.

    --
    Toro

  51. Re:Its a ZUNE though. Who cares? IT uses WMP .. ew by fbartho · · Score: 1

    You can actually display itunes embedded in the task bar too!

    Right-click on the task bar, and go to toolbars, and select the itunes toolbar.

    just thought you'd like to know. It was a nifty feature when I was stuck on a tiny single screen for awhile.

    --
    Gravity Sucks
  52. Here's why the Zune sucks by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's much larger and heavier than an iPod. The interface is not as simple or intuitive, but clunky.

    Even aside from that, at time of launch it cost more than a simmilar iPod!

    The only thing the Zune ever had going for it was WiFi. And Microsoft botched that up so bad it's ridiculous (why no Zireless sync? Why no wirless purchase of music?)

    The fact that they went to the trouble and expense to include WiFi but not include these basic features people would WANT it for is ridiculous. and indicates they did not do proper market research. The whole "WiFi share" idea is also retarded in a number of ways.

    1. Re:Here's why the Zune sucks by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      The larger/heavier is subjective.

      It's less then an ounce heavier. It's slightly larger. Come on. Should I rightfully point out using your verbage that the zune screen is MUCH larger. It's over 50% bigger!!!!.
      See. All that crap is meaningless. Numbers and whether it means something to you or not. For man, I'd guess both are small and light enough so size didn't matter. To some, that .8 oz difference in weight between the two might matter.

      iPOD 4.1" x 2.4" x 0.43 - 4.8 oz Zune 4.4" x 2.4" x 0.6" - 5.5 oz

      And 30 Gig vs 30 Gig they were the same exact price when the zune hit the market and the Zune is the cheaper of the two now.

      You're just another hater here to spew fud about something you know crap about but already hate.

  53. 60606 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RM RMVB to AVI MPEG DVD Converter is a powerful RealMedia converter software which can convert RM, RMVB to AVI, DivX, Xvid, MPEG1, MPEG2, VCD, SVCD, DVD format. It also supports convert RM, RMVB files to DVD-Video files(VIDEO_TS, AUDIO_TS) and VCD/SVCD...

    http://www.rm-converter.net/

  54. They didnt learn from 1982 did they.... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Doesnt MS see why PCs were so popular during the 80s ?
    They were NOT LOCKED, to one piece of generic software, but could run anything, zero drm.
    You could buy software, and pirate it or make it your self. It was total software freedom for the consumer of said hardware, you could do anything to it liked.

    If MS made the zune like a mini-pc, 100% open, it would be #1. Software makes hardware more powerfull/valuable, bad software can make good hardware look crap.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  55. pros and consequences by aapold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given the zunepass subscription model, someone could effectively grab a ridiculous amount of free music for any player (including ipods). Heck, you can even download the zuneplayer without owning a zune, but don't think it will let you subscribe without one. And then cancel the zunepass subscription when they are done. Given sheer logistics, its probably impossible to grab the entire marketplace, but you probably could grab just about everything you wanted, at least until they patch this and i'm sure they have people working overtime on this. Because the danger is that the RIAA would pull their stuff out of the marketplace if they don't feel confident microsoft can protect their content, they're already overly nervous about something like a subscription and wifi sharing, to the point where they'd crippled much of the device's potential.

    I use a zune, mainly for the subscription model, the player is nice for some things but there are times I'd rather use my sony ericsson phone because its a lot smaller, heck, i use it sometimes although that's limited to my none-zune marketplace content... My zune is more used in my car and at my desk. But I take it with me elsewhere at times because of the greatly expanded content I have access to on it. at least till now, where this would allow me to listen to it on that device. I'd happily keep paying my subscription fee if I had a means to listen to it on the device of my choice. You know, like that playsforsure concept...

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:pros and consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Because the danger is that the RIAA would pull their stuff out of the marketplace if they don't feel confident microsoft can protect their content"

      What's their alternative? To sell CD's only? Has that worked for them so far?

      That's a pretty hollow threat from them.

  56. Re:Its a ZUNE though. Who cares? IT uses WMP .. ew by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

    As a mere Vista user I'm interested in knowing what version of WMP you used Last time I checked Windows Media Player 11 (as it comes installed) doesn't automatically alter your MP3's. I've just moved my vista installation over to a new hard drive and opening WMP for the second time then going to the library drop down arrow then to "More options" The following are the defaults:


    [x]Delete Files when deleted from my library
    [x]Retrieve additional information from the internet
    [x]Only add missing information
    [ ]Overwrite all Media information
    [ ]Rename music files using rip music settings
    [ ]Rearrange rip music in rip music folder, using rip music settings
    [x]Maintain my star ratings as global ratings in files

    So by default it might add composer information or an auto rating to the id3 tag it won't change the album photo it won't change the artist, it won't change the album name. Compare to my recent expearence with iTunes 7.10 which I installed to see if it had improved. First off it tried taking all my music and putting it into a Itunes Folder inside ther My Music folder, while it was doing this it find the dozen or so WMA's I have and began converting them to AAC's a format. To make matters worse quicktime assumed control for any MP3's I streamed from online (blocking WMP) and it dispersed one of my old compilation albums into a series of single 3 song singles all of which were incorrectly labelled. The fact it won't recognise a flash drive or my PPC phone as something it could sync to was just the icing on the cake for me.

    Yes DRM's end is coming and hopefully it will be soon I am truely looking forward to the day when I can just run a media centre PC with all my DVD's & CD's ripped onto it without wondering where I actually stand legally. I own more than 200 DVD's now if I think a film is good I'll buy it at a price I think the film is worth it you don't have to assume I'm a crock.

  57. In other news... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Sony calls new BD+ blu-ray DRM "uncrackable."

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  58. Re:Its a ZUNE though. Who cares? IT uses WMP .. ew by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Doesnt seem to work in vista 32. I see the itunes toolbar in the list of toolbars but it doesnt display. In vista 64 i dont even see it in the list of tool bars

  59. Re:Its a ZUNE though. Who cares? IT uses WMP .. ew by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    I used WMP11. I never said it automatically altered them. I used their tool to update the tags and album art, and they all showed up as untitiled. WMP always had 3 versions of the same dam album (songs list and album art were the same)... and never got anything right.

    It ruined my collection. I do not like WMP11 at all.