Slashdot Mirror


In Search of the Cheap Linux Laptop

mr_mischief writes "According to Hot Hardware's recent review, Asus is getting ready to unleash a $199 compact notebook running Linux. This is entirely different from this recent $150 Linux laptop story which many Slashdot readers believed to be a scam. There's a dual-mode menu which offers a simple system for novice computer users, and a slightly more advanced version for others. It's not aimed squarely at the same market as the One Laptop Per Child project's XO, and is expected to be sold to end users worldwide. It's targeted at new users who don't own a computer or at people who want a cheap, small laptop for basic tasks. The reviewed version has a 7" screen and a cramped keyboard to match, but a 10" version is available for $100 more. It offers built-in wired and wireless networking, four USB 2.0 ports, and a three-hour battery life. The storage options are a bit cramped, as you only get 4 GB of on-board storage (8 GB on the $299 model) and no optical drive. As the review says, though, USB 2.0 can make up for that if you like, and the lack of moving drive parts makes the machine run dead quiet."

421 comments

  1. My Chicken House needs a Laptop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was thinking about adding a single board computer to my hen house to control a few things: Cameras, Stepper Motor and a maybe a relay for a fan... But if laptop's keep getting cheaper I will consider the monitor and keyboard there for diagnostics (too bad it can't be powered over Ethernet!

    Anony Mouse!

  2. An NT$10 coin by croddy · · Score: 3, Informative

    The author shows a photo with the laptop next to a Taiwan $10 coin, adding that it is about the same size as a US half-dollar. Since this won't help most folks in the US (for whom receiving a half-dollar coin in change is a rare occurrence), it may help to know that the NT$10 coin is not quite 2mm larger than a U.S. quarter.

    1. Re:An NT$10 coin by Pentavirate · · Score: 5, Funny

      The author shows a photo with the laptop next to a Taiwan $10 coin, adding that it is about the same size as a US half-dollar. Since this won't help most folks in the US (for whom receiving a half-dollar coin in change is a rare occurrence), it may help to know that the NT$10 coin is not quite 2mm larger than a U.S. quarter.

      Most people in the US don't know what a millimeter is either ;-).
    2. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there's more people in the US with an idea of the size of a half dollar than those who know how much "not quite 2 mm" is. Metric is something that happens elsewhere.

    3. Re:An NT$10 coin by chuckymonkey · · Score: 1

      What!? This is America! We don't use the metric system here, what are you thinking?! You mean that it is .07874 inches bigger than the quarter. Sheesh people these days ;).

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    4. Re:An NT$10 coin by celery+stalk · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...next to a Taiwan $10 coin...about the same size as a US half-dollar

      it may help to know that the NT$10 coin is not quite 2mm larger than a U.S. quarter.

      I'd tend to disagree with the article...I remember "50 cent piece" to be noticeably larger than a US quarter, and Wikipedia agrees with me. Though you are right with your comment.

      Diameter: 30.61 mm (1.205 in) Half dollar (United States coin)

      Diameter: 24.26 mm (0.955 in) Quarter (United States coin)

      Diameter: 26 mm New Taiwan dollar NT$10 Coin
      --
      aaaand...whee!
    5. Re:An NT$10 coin by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Just a quick question? Why call it a half dollar? Why not call it "50 Cents" or just "a half"

    6. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "50 Cents" implies multiple. "A half"...of what?

      Hope that clears it up for you.

    7. Re:An NT$10 coin by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      It's used so rarely in the US that it might as well not exist. Therefore there's no abbreviation, because we never talk about it.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    8. Re:An NT$10 coin by camperslo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most people in the US don't know what a millimeter is either ;-).

      Try telling them that a cigarette is about 100 mm.

      It gets complicated using penises as a standard. There's this thing called net-inches...

      Stevie420: Are you sure I'd like it? I've never done anything like that before
      BillyG666: You'll love it. If I slapped it down on your keyboard it would go from A to Z
      BillyG666: Oh shit...

      It's too hard to tell what's up when a guy has a little one. Last week I met this guy with one the size of a golf pencil. I couldn't tell if he was trying to make love or trying to erase me...

    9. Re:An NT$10 coin by arth1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      What the heck is .07874 inches? Real Americans would say 5/64".

    10. Re:An NT$10 coin by snoyberg · · Score: 1

      I think GP means that if you call a 25 cent piece a quarter, call a 50 cent piece a half.

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    11. Re:An NT$10 coin by jjrockman · · Score: 5, Funny

      We could only wish 50 Cent didn't exist.

      --
      Quit jabbering on the phone while driving. You are not that important.
    12. Re:An NT$10 coin by chuckymonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Touche!

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    13. Re:An NT$10 coin by shaitand · · Score: 1

      A 25 cent piece is actually called a quarter dollar. It is only shortened to quarter in slang. Half dollars aren't used very often and so nobody would recognize what you were saying if you referred to it as just a half.

    14. Re:An NT$10 coin by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      Um, because "50 cents" IS "a half" of what?... right, a dollar.

      Why call it slashdot? Why not slashperiod?

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    15. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the same size as a US quarter, making half-dollar coins rather confusing with quarters

    16. Re:An NT$10 coin by croddy · · Score: 1

      Actually, where I grew up most people called it a "50-cent piece".

    17. Re:An NT$10 coin by schon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try telling them that a cigarette is about 100 mm. Long or wide?
    18. Re:An NT$10 coin by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      it's called "half dollar" or "50 cent piece" in the US. Half is probably not used because it's only one syllable or maybe too generic. and quarter is used instead of "quarter dollar" because that might just be too long. I'm just guessing here.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    19. Re:An NT$10 coin by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Someone should inform the US Treasury and US Mint of that factoid. http://www.usmint.gov/about_the_mint/index.cfm?fla sh=yes&action=coin_specifications

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    20. Re:An NT$10 coin by Maniac-X · · Score: 1

      That's rough... I hope he at least cleaned up his eraser shavings..

      --
      (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)gnore?_
    21. Re:An NT$10 coin by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You mean the contractor the mint hired to design the table heading? I usually refer to the coins themselves and you will find 'Quarter Dollar' firmly stamped in... whatever composition of metal that page mentions just below the eagle on each coin.

    22. Re:An NT$10 coin by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      No, I mean the US Treasury. In every instance I've found of "quarter dollar" on their site, it was in fact spelled "quarter-dollar", and used descriptively. You're referring to the denomination as if it were a name. Do you think dollar bills and Sacagawea dollar coins share a name because they both have "ONE DOLLAR" on them?

      The best I could find on this topic was Federal laws issuing directives to the treasury. They used the phrase "quarter dollar coins" descriptively.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    23. Re:An NT$10 coin by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Most people in the US don't know what a millimeter is either ;-).

      Isn't a millimeter a specialized electronic test meter?
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    24. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most people in the US don't know what a millimeter is either ;-)."

      The majority populous of those millimeter countries call weight kilograms. And everybody knows kilograms is a fundamental SI unit of mass. And it's beating a dead horse to say the fundamental units of weight are (mass)(length)/time^2

    25. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on if you're from New York or not.;-)

    26. Re:An NT$10 coin by guisar · · Score: 1

      Couldn't believe nobody had acknowledged this mod-point worthy pun so I did it myself. Well done.

    27. Re:An NT$10 coin by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Yes but what fraction of a library of congress is a U.S. quarter?

    28. Re:An NT$10 coin by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      Try telling them that a cigarette is about 100 mm.

      Long or wide?

      Around.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    29. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      most women is asia know what a millimeter is!

    30. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's used so rarely in the US that it might as well not exist. Therefore there's no abbreviation, because we never talk about it.


      I see you don't play the slots (which is a good thing, of course.) 50-cent pieces are a staple at most casinos where they see heavy use. Of course they rarely leave the casinos, either, since they're either spent or traded for paper.

    31. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try telling them that a cigarette is about 100 mm.
      Long or wide?
      That's just so wrong. (Note to myself: Stop downloading and staring at porns - she knows).
    32. Re:An NT$10 coin by Aard88 · · Score: 1

      Golf Pencils have no erasers

    33. Re:An NT$10 coin by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      Try telling them that a cigarette is about 100 mm.
      But a cigarette is not 100 mm. A king size filter cigarette is 84 mm . There are 100mm and 120mm cigaretters available, but they are usually in slims/thins and anorexic widths and with target market (mostly) as women.
      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    34. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because a slashperiod sounds like something you'd need a bigger tampax for.

    35. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll love it. If I slapped it down on your keyboard it would go from A to Z


      The missing information is that it was a Dvorak layout.
    36. Re:An NT$10 coin by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      A half-dollar is about as wide as a laptop is thick. If you need one, for $3.48 postage and handling, I can mail one to you.

    37. Re:An NT$10 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many football fields is it?

    38. Re:An NT$10 coin by lordtoran · · Score: 0

      Or a German keyboard, but in which case he still would have a sub-par penis of ~ 9cm.

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    39. Re:An NT$10 coin by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

      It's like getting a half-shekel back in change. "What the hell am I supposed to do with this?!"
      Useless unless you have two of them...

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  3. 32GB USB stick by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Toshiba do a 32GB USB flash drive, so storage isn't a problem :)

    1. Re:32GB USB stick by harrkev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The big problem with flash drive (IMHO) is that they stick out.

      It would be cool if such a device could have an "internal" USB drive bay. Basicly, you open a lid and there is a recess large enough to stick most USB drives. That way you can upgrade the machine without having anything sticking out.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:32GB USB stick by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You have to open the machine up, but you can buy flash drives that plug directly into the 9 pin headers present on most motherboards.

    3. Re:32GB USB stick by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They do, but the format is SD (there's a standard SD slot) and the maximum I've seen an SD card so far is 8GB.

      Still, I've seen 8GB cards for under $80, so aside from screen size, you could EASILY upgrade the $199 version to the same internal capabilities as the $299 version for under $80.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:32GB USB stick by mmxsaro · · Score: 1

      Nope, try 32 GB SD(HC). Don't forget that there's two main types of SD slots though: SD and SDHC, and they're not really compatible with each other (SD can't read SDHC).

    5. Re:32GB USB stick by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware those were out yet. My old IPAQ had an SDHC slot- but it's been about a year since I looked at the market, as my new TMobile MDA only has a MiniSDHC slot.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:32GB USB stick by BlackSmithNZ · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You know, thinking about it, 8GB is not so bad.

      I get roped into doing support for family & friends, and the typical grandmother PC once degunked, normally has a few card games, maybe a few photo's & a pile of email (all dumped in the inbox along with 2000 spam messages).

      When I back up a family computer, (trying hard to ignore the crap pr0n on my father-in-laws 'puter), I typically don't have to compress anything to fit on a 800mb CD - it's often just Outlook Express email & nothing else.

      get you grandmother set up with one of these laptops and a gmail account, and they will be happy. No having to pay McAfee or MS for endless updates, makes their life easy. Sure they will complain when they can't run the .SCR Christmas card that some stranger sent them, but quiet & portable will win them over.

      Isn't think the Google vision for the future of computing; and Microsoft's nightmare; people using generic, cheap laptops for accessing Google, a PS3/Wii for games and some USB/LAN attached box for your data storage? 8GB - or maybe a few more via the USB port is enough for many people; and for those with video/mp3 collections, plug in an external 500GB HDD; as/when you need it.

    7. Re:32GB USB stick by Jorophose · · Score: 0

      4GiB is good enough too for /, as long as you put /home on a 1/2GiB SD card or something; it's only 14$ Canadian for 1GiB SD card, and I know a store in New York that has 2GiB SD cards for something like 20$, "trusted" vendors too, like Kingston and Crucial. My current desktop has like 10GiB for /, but I only use like 6GiB (With a lot of useless programs sitting around, stuff like OO.o, FrostWire, wine, etc. aren't necessary on a subnotebook) and I could easily drive it down to less. The SD card doesn't stick out either, so it's like it's non-existant, and you could use it on other PCs to transfer data quicker.

      The only issue with getting one of these would be trying to turn off the OS's logs, if that's even possible...

  4. Re:$899 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    did you forget your password?

  5. Could have been cheaper by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    I think they went with small size at the expense of having a higher cost. What if they had not used flash memory and went with a traditional HD instead. What if they went with a slightly larger MB/chipset - cheaper still. Or heavier components.

    When optimizing for cost (purely), the device would be both larger and have a spinning HD.

    1. Re:Could have been cheaper by harrkev · · Score: 3, Informative

      When optimizing for cost (purely), the device would be both larger and have a spinning HD.
      Nope. A USB storage device is just a chip. Small, cheap. In fact, you can get a $4GB USB drive for around $30 *retail.* If you are buying raw chips for incorporating into your own product, expect a smaller price tag.

      A spinning hard drive, on the other hand, requires mounting hardware, connectors, cables, and the hard drive itself has a lot of moving mechanical parts. Keep in mind that these things are made by the thousands, or more. Buying out the clearance of last-year's model is not really an option.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:Could have been cheaper by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact, you can get a $4GB USB drive for around $30 *retail.*

      That's extremely generous. Sales and clearance items do not apply. I'd put the price at $50, and that's generous.

      Meanwhile, a 20GB 2.5" HDD can be had for $30, and yet has 5X the capacity. And the capacity increases far faster than size. You can get an 80GB HDD for the same price as your 4GB flash.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Could have been cheaper by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Yes but this is laptop. The price of the drive isn't the whole ball of wax, they would have to add a chipset that could communicate with your drive.

    4. Re:Could have been cheaper by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      you can get 2 gigs on a single die, you can stack that die with a block storage controller in a single chip.
      In 10K unit quantities those sell for about $12-20
      so since this is ASUS and Intel, I'm betting the price is closer to the $12 range and is a single TSOP48 chip, or the board may have 4 lands on it for 4 2gig chips and a separate controller, thus "modders" will be able to upgrade the machine for under $50 as a single 2Gig in a TSOP48 can now be had in the $8.00 range.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Could have been cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 4GB solid state harddisk is ONE chip that is soldered directly to the mainboard (and costs nowhere near $50: That's the normal retail price of a 4GB USB stick, including case, connector, controller, circuit board, packaging, manufacturer markup and retail markup). A harddisk needs a mounting frame, a connector, much more room, more power and manual assembly.

    6. Re:Could have been cheaper by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      The last Ive checked, Windows could NOT boot from a USB memory device (well, the kernel just couldnt handle it, bootmanager didnt care)

      Asus says its Windows Compat, so no go. It will have to get the IDE treatment.. However, IDE-CF cards do work well.

      --
    7. Re:Could have been cheaper by computer_chacham · · Score: 1

      Contract Price for two 2GB flash chips is $31.20 http://www.dramexchange.com/ so I don't think the parent poster is that off. Soldering them in with whatever interface they need is probably less than $5.

      You're also neglecting a few things--like physical size, weight, reliability, and power. Hard drives are by far the largest cause of laptop returns, so flash keeps the overall price lower. A 2.5" drive would not fit in such a small laptop, so you would need a 1.8" or smaller drive, which would cost more than (your rather optimistic) $30, and be quite a bit slower to boot (no pun intended...) Flash's much lower power consumption means a cheaper, lighter, battery; and makes cooling of the device easier (cheaper!)

    8. Re:Could have been cheaper by edwdig · · Score: 1

      In fact, you can get a $4GB USB drive for around $30 *retail.*


      That's extremely generous. Sales and clearance items do not apply. I'd put the price at $50, and that's generous.


      MicroCenter here in NJ has billboards all over the place advertising 2 GB USB drives for $15. Has been for months. Every now and then the price has been about $12-$13. When the store first opened they were mailing out coupons to get them for free. Obviously they did that to raise awareness of the store, but they can't be very expensive considering they sent out a LOT of those coupons.
    9. Re:Could have been cheaper by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      At Newegg.com (not the best but usually pretty good pricing).

      4GB SD $35

      2.5" 40GB $40

      I think the biggest expens would be in added cooling, added battery, and added manufacture cost though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    10. Re:Could have been cheaper by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the UK, I can get a few varieties of 4GB flash drive for £18 + VAT. That works out at $36, which is 'around $30' (20% off). Flash tends to be cheaper in the USA, so I wouldn't consider $30 unreasonable. Even at $36 including assembly, USB plugs, OEM and reseller markup it doesn't seem unlikely that you could buy the chips for around $20 in bulk. Of course, the flash chips in the cheap USB drives tend to be pretty slow...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:Could have been cheaper by evilviper · · Score: 1

      they would have to add a chipset that could communicate with your drive.

      As opposed to what? I realize it's Flash memory, but it's certainly not going to be hardwired to the bus... That would make for a ridiculously proprietary system, that needs custom kernel patches to boot at all.

      If you're talking about USB, well, taking up a USB port that could otherwise be used isn't free, and USB-IDE adapters are pretty close to dirt cheap in quantities.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:Could have been cheaper by evilviper · · Score: 1

      MicroCenter here in NJ has billboards all over the place advertising 2 GB USB drives for $15.

      I'd bet that's just a loss-leader, both because of the price (lower than anywhere else) and also due to them advertising that low price.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:Could have been cheaper by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      "That's extremely generous. Sales and clearance items do not apply. I'd put the price at $50, and that's generous."

      not really, you can buy 4GB usb flash drives from crucial.com for around 40$, wholesale on those is about 30$. Mass produced much less

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    14. Re:Could have been cheaper by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Right - in a way - we agree. Because they made too small to have the least expensive HDD.

    15. Re:Could have been cheaper by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

      30 USD for for a 4 GB USB is indeed cheap, but 50 USD is probably more expensive than they are. Costs me about 45 EUR here.

      1) I want to run my OS _fast_.
      2) I want to _fix_ my OS from different computer easily when its broken.
      3) I don't _need_ 20 GB. I need approx 4-8 GB for my OS.

      USB is a good solution. A disadvantage is indeed that it sticks out.

      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
    16. Re:Could have been cheaper by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Go to Newegg, pull up 4GB drives and sort by lowest price one model at $29.99, three models at $32.99, 3 models at $32.99. Not on clearance, no discount.

      (And as other responses have pointed out, hard drives are bigger, heavier, noisier and hotter. Add in extra expense for interface and cooling. And keep in mind that a packaged USB drive is going to be significantly more expensive than the raw flash chips.)

  6. $450 gets you a decent laptop by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What confuses me as soon as it says "$100 more" is that you are at $299 and for another $150 you can wander into BestBuy and splash $450 on a decent laptop that comes with Vista. Knocking $80 or what ever for the OEM version means that you are talking $370 or so for a decent laptop with a decent screen and a decent disk et al and this is for something with a dual core Intel processor.

    Now given Moore's Law around the hardware, and screen real estate, its a bit odd that $299 gets you a computer that is that crap. Now I can see why at the $100 limit you'll be cutting loads of corners especially if you want it to work on low power, but the concept of a $299 machine with crap specs doesn't sound cheap.

    $100 means cutting lots of corners, but at $299 it just sounds, somewhat bizarrely, like a bit of a rip off.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      a decent laptop that comes with Vista

      Oxymoron alert! Oxymoron alert!
    2. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      What confuses me as soon as it says "$100 more" is that you are at $299 and for another $150 you can wander into BestBuy and splash $450 on a decent laptop that comes with Vista.


      Perhaps, but that's for a time-and-a-half the cost of "high end" of the ASUS inexpensive laptops.

    3. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by keithjr · · Score: 1

      The reason the OLPC project has taken so much heat about their price increase is that those few extra dollars are much more significant is some parts of the world.

      The specs honestly aren't that bad considering for their target audience, all that the computer needs to do (most of the time) is play media, create and edit documents, and browse the web.

      The more major names that get behind this realization, the better off for the world at large. Average Joe computer user doesn't need a PCIe x16 graphics card. He just doesn't.

    4. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by timholman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What confuses me as soon as it says "$100 more" is that you are at $299 and for another $150 you can wander into BestBuy and splash $450 on a decent laptop that comes with Vista. Knocking $80 or what ever for the OEM version means that you are talking $370 or so for a decent laptop with a decent screen and a decent disk et al and this is for something with a dual core Intel processor.

      For the market this laptop is intended for, 4 GB of storage is probably perfectly adequate. Keep in mind that 4 GB hard drives were standard for laptops just ten years ago, and lots of people did real work with that much storage. At $199 a pop, Asus will have a laptop that is nearly cheap enough to become an impulse buy for a lot of people.

      Sure, you can always get a much better machine for a little more money, but a certain segment of the market is always attracted by the lowest possible price. Clearly this is what Asus is aiming for.
    5. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But $450 doesn't buy you a subnotebook with a solid state harddisk, and $450 is 50% more expensive. If the $299 laptop is reasonably sturdy and has decent battery life, and I suspect it will because the display is 10" small and there is no spinning disc, then it is a bargain.

    6. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by rsilva · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just one question: can you show me a $ 450,00 descent laptop that weights around 2 pounds?

      The weight, hence portability, is clearly a key factor for this computer.

    7. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The 199$ machine sounds like a decent value - hey, it's a computer at 200$! The 300$ version I agree sounds somewhat underwhelming. With computers, the cost which relates to the price is often counterintuitive. If you have a pound of flesh, you can trivially cut it two and sell each for half. If you have a single-layer single-platter HDD, you can't easily sell HDDs with half a platter's size - not at half price anyway.

      Looking at my nearest webshop, their cheapest socket 775 processor is a 3.46GHz PIV. Yes, three and a half gigahertz and you couldn't buy a slower one if you wanted. Why? Because they can't make a 1.75GHz PIV for half the price, they got their process, their die size and it would cost practically as much to produce.

      I understand that first-time buyers might go for the really lowest of low-end just for the sake of having a computer. Everyone else would be better off sticking with their old junk just a little bit longer because up to a certain point you get so much more for your money, which means it'll last you much longer. Not the latest and greatest, but not trying to squeeze the last 50$ out of the lemon.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you buy it for portability and not specs, hell yes, $300 is a good price for a 10" notebook. For coparison, the cheapest sub-12" notebook at Newegg that's is a Fujitsu Lifebook at around $1500 on sale.

      What I primarily use a notebook for is web browsing, e-mail and a terminal window. What benefit would a high spec laptop with Vista have for me? It'd just burn battery and heat up my genitals.

    9. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by blhack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as impulse buys go, $199 is really doable. Think about airports, sell this thing for 200 bucks and give you free wifi in the airport for the rest of the day; i REALLY think you might get some people with too much money to buy the thing....i know i would (if i forgot my laptop).

      And something i just thought of: i paid almost this much money for my soekris board, and that thing didn't have a SCREEN, a battery, a keyboard, come to think of it....where is that soren guy, i'm gonna kick his ass!

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    10. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The $450 BestBuy laptop will not be a lightweight 10" machine though. The cheapest LifeBook P7230 which costs ~$1,600 w/ rebates, and it has a 1.2 Ghz Core Solo, 1 Gig of RAM and an Intel GFX chip. The only thing it has significantly more of is the HDD, but then it's not a solid state thingie.

      Looking at the Eee's specs, it's significantly better than the old Compaq Armada M300 I currently have. My M300 was originally equipped with a 6GB hard drive, so the 8GB or 16GB models would actually be an improvement, if I hadn't upgraded it with an 80GB Seagate drive :). Assuming the 10" screen will be at least 1024x768, it would be an excellent replacement for the armada, whose battery is beginning to crap out. Faster processor, double the RAM amount and battery life, more USB ports, built in wireless, and a webcam all for just $299.

      Despite my excitement, whether the 10" Eee is a rip off or not depends on the needs and expectations of the user. I almost always carry my M300 with me, and I mainly use it for web surfing, some office tasks, light coding work and some gaming. This is exactly what I'd want the Eee to do, and I'm sure it'll handle these tasks just fine (by gaming I meant an occasional game of Starcraft or Doom deathmatch). If, on the other hand, the laptop will always remain on the table at home, and is expected to run Vista, then yeah, an additional $100 will get you a much more suitable machine.

      Ok... I now see that there are quite a few replies already, but I'll still post this in case I covered something that hasn't been mentioned yet.

    11. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by tkw954 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Moore's law only applies to the number of transistors on a chip at a given price range. I'd imagine that at this price point, the case, screen, keyboard and connectors become a more significant cost than the transistors on the chips.

    12. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a fine analysis if, in fact, you are in the market for a laptop. I will buy this ASUS machine precisely because I *don't* want a laptop, I want an ultramobile internet device with a full keyboard and decent battery life. Essentially I want a device that does everything the iPhone does (minus the phone, I already have one of those) but without the cramped keyboard. the proprietary lock-in and the hefty price tag.

    13. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you take Vista out of that $450 deal, the computer becomes more expensive. The manufacturer probably got one of those "$80 for Vista if all your computers run Vista, $120 otherwise" offers and made the obvious choice, so not delivering Vista doesn't reduce the cost. No preinstalled Vista also means no preinstalled AOL, Norton, etc., which means no payments from AOL, Norton, etc. for the in-your-face advertisement that you spend your first half hour with the new computer removing. A computer without Vista costs more than one with Vista.

    14. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      What confuses me as soon as it says "$100 more" is that you are at $299 and for another $150 you can wander into BestBuy and splash $450 on a decent laptop that comes with Vista. Knocking $80 or what ever for the OEM version means that you are talking $370 or so for a decent laptop with a decent screen and a decent disk et al and this is for something with a dual core Intel processor.

      Not everyone needs a "decent laptop". I am considering hooking up my grandparents with two of those to keep connected and allow them to use the internet. All depends on whether their "novice" mode is easier than Windows Vista / XP.

      If it's not, then it's not worth it.

    15. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by tepples · · Score: 3, Funny

      can you show me a $ 450,00 descent laptop that weights around 2 pounds? You can run Descent on a Nintendo DS with a homebrew card, and that weighs a lot less than 2 pounds and costs less than 450 USD.
    16. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      Considering that this device is a good bit more powerful and expandable than the Palm Foleo, yet it is about the same form factor and just as portable, $299 isn't a bad price at all. The Foleo is $499 ($49 more than your cheap laptop example) and is nothing more than a PDA in a laptop shell. The Eee is a true ultraportable laptop; while it is shown running Linux with Qtopia and KDE frontends, I could easily see it running Windows XP with the specs listed. I would venture to say that the Eee's biggest fans will be those folks who considered a Foleo but want more for their money. I don't think it's meant to be compared to a "true" laptop.

      And yes, you are correct in that you can get a decent Windows-based laptop for $450, but it won't be nearly as silent, lightweight or, dare I say it, "cool" as the Eee. I'd love to have one to throw in the backpack on road trips.

    17. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by ejito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      its a bit odd that $299 gets you a computer that is that crap.
      This one is finally the laptop I want: small, lightweight, and not bloated. I don't want to spend 1-2k USD on a mini laptop, and I don't want to spend 500 USD on a bulky laptop, even if it's faster and has extras like Vista (no thanks).

      For it's size and weight, this is an excellent buy. Usually we'd be paying more for such a small size. You don't need speed on a a lightweight portable -- save the speed for a desktop (if you want to use your laptop as a desktop, that's a whole different issue).
    18. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by qualidafial · · Score: 1

      What benefit would a high spec laptop with Vista have for me? It'd just burn battery and heat up my genitals. Also, be sure your laptop battery isn't made by Sony before setting it on your genitals.
    19. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      Because all of the other laptops are 15 inch screens and weigh at least 5 to 6 pounds (if you're lucky) - this is just under 2lbs with a 7 inch screen. All other super-small notebooks on the market are currently about $1100 to $1500 USD EASILY, and even with the other 2 subnotebooks coming out soon - the VIA Nanobook and PALM Foleo are both around 500 to 600 USD for extremely close to the same specs.

    20. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an oxymoron. Redundant maybe, like "hot chick with emotional problems," but everybody knows you need one helluva laptop to run Vista.

    21. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by intx13 · · Score: 1

      Everyone's definition of "a decent laptop" is different. For me, this IS a decent laptop.. why should I spend $370 for what YOU consider a decent laptop when $299 will get me exactly what I want? I'm sure that Asus has done their market research, and they feel that enough people consider this to be a decent laptop that it's worth their time to put it together. My Dell Latitude D505 (which is small and light compared to most Dells or HPs, but still not what's considered a tiny laptop) is on its last legs, and this tiny cheapo laptop looks like it might fit the bill.

      It just depends what you need. Asus considers this thing to be what some people need - and I can vouch that they're right for at least one person!

    22. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      150 ontop of 300 is a 50% increase in cost. Do you want to pay 1.5 times. for 1.5 times your $450 ($675) you could get a laptop with a core duo. 1.5 times that ($1012) you can get a pretty nice Dell and 1.5 that you can get yourself a MacBook Pro.

      so your $450 laptop is a rip off.

      I would honestly prefer the cheapest $200 version. just a beater laptop that can take some notes, run some small apps (like a compiler and editor) or a small word processor for doing novel writing, poetry, whatever. If you smash it, gets stolen, whatever. it's not going to break the bank.

      I don't think of computers as high performance number crunchers for all my scientific super computer needs. I think they are appliances that can do a few tasks and do them well and cheaply.

      Why is my desk calculator a very simple scientific instead of a fancy graphing calculator? Simple, they don't make solar powered graphing calculators, and this one was only $10 and can do sin/cos/tan and hexidecimal.

      ps - 1.5 times $200 is $300. see how this all works out?

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    23. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I was thinking the same thing. Also, at the light weight and size, i could haul this on my bike easy. A ultra tiny dell is $1500. Heck, if i can RDP to my home PC from the road, this thing is going to be perfect!

    24. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I am strongly considering getting one of these, but only if it is fast enough to play H.264 encoded videos at a decent resolution (640x480 would be good, though HD resolutions would be better). I have a 1GHz G4 PowerBook that is unable to do so without stuttering.

      If it can do this, the Asus Eee is less computer than I want, but more than I need. At that price, it is a great value.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    25. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Glytch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what I was thinking as well. I was also thinking that this would make a nice light take-anywhere "beater". Something inexpensive and replaceable, without any moving parts, that I could throw in a backpack for use at wifi hotspots. It's also not too badly spec'd considering the price. If I can boot from a USB drive and replace the stock distro with slackware, I'd definitely consider picking one up.

    26. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I got a 10" laptop from averatec that I'm very happy with (Averatec 1020). It has the standard features, 60gb hd, 1 GHz Celeron M, 512Mb ram (with 2 slots, both upgradeable), and 1280x768 resolution. It only cost be about $900, so significantly cheaper than the lifebook, but significantly more expensive (and more powerful) than this one.

      If I didn't already have this machine though, I'd be lined up to get this new one.

    27. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I was looking at the Asus Eee PC at the weekend and thinking exactly the same thing. The 7" version looks like a great little machine. Looking at the specs, it seems like every component is supported by FreeBSD, and the booting from ISO images on a USB flash drive feature would make installing a new OS on it trivial. I also really like the fact that it has a single-button trackpad (although that might put a few *NIX users off) and a meta key that doesn't have the Windows logo on it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    28. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, forgot to mention, that price and model was a year ago, almost exactly.

    29. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by JM78 · · Score: 1

      ...decent laptop that comes with Vista.

      LOL; sorry, I just choked on my sandwich...

      Did you just use that phrase in a real sentence?

      --
      I am Jack's smirking revenge.
    30. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Funny

      What benefit would a high spec laptop with Vista have for me?


      Why, the Windows Genuine Advantage, of course.
    31. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by westlake · · Score: 0
      but everybody knows you need one helluva laptop to run Vista.

      What "everyone knows" is often wrong.

      Acer Aspire 3680 14.1" Widescreen Laptop PC w/ Intel Celeron M Processor

      Vista Basic
      512 MB RAM (expand to 2 GB)
      80 GB HDD
      DVD Burner
      WiFi
      $449

      Compaq Presario 15.4" Widescreen Laptop PC w/ AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor

      Vista Premium
      1 GB RAM (Expand to 2 GB)
      120 GB HDD
      DVD Burner
      NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150 graphics
      WiFi
      $600

    32. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by westlake · · Score: 1
      Think about airports

      If you are spending time in airports - your laptop is not an impulse buy - and you are not the target market.

    33. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but that's for a time-and-a-half the cost of "high end" of the ASUS inexpensive laptops.

        Uh.... *boggle* I got a dollar says you can't diagram that sentence.

    34. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by jbarr · · Score: 1

      I have to agree 100% with the parent, please mod him up.

      The enticing thing about a laptop of this price and capability really is the size. Having a compact and very portable WiFi-enabled sub-notebook for about $200 just blows my mind. There are plenty of times when I wanted to use a notebook, but my $500 wide-screen Acer was just too bulky to take with me. A decent, solid, capable sub-notebook like this just might fill that desire.

      In fact, coming from the PDA world, I have always wished that someone would come out with a sub-sub-notebook. You know, a clamshell notebook that measures maybe 5"x8" when closed. Sony's UX-50 was a great start, but was really too small, and like all Sony PDA products, they gave up on it long before they could have improved upon it.

      I'm really gonna have to check this out when it's released.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    35. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Assassin_for_Atari · · Score: 1
      Yeah you really can't get a laptop in its weight class for 200/300 bucks. As soon as I saw this I wanted it. When I saw this I thought "awesome vacation companion"! Why? cause its small, light weight, has net access and for 200 bucks, if it gets jacked (being stolen or broken) WHO CARES!....Now my laptop that I paid around 700 for....Now I'm caring, and its heavy ...and battery life is so so...and etc etc.


      Its also awesome for say, a backpack. once again, the price, its weight and what it can do make it great for those coffee shop moments :D.

    36. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      I plan on getting one (if/when they come out) solely for word processing on the subway. It's cheap/light/small enough to lug around everywhere. And it's Linux!!! All I really need is bash/vim/perl/pdflatex (maybe gcc & java, if that will all fit on 4gigs). I'd also imagine it's a bit more rugged than an average laptop (ie: no moving parts, except a cpu fan?)---and best of all... if it breaks, you can get a new one for $200 :-)

      I've been waiting for something like this for a -while-.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    37. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Eee does have a CPU fan, which is the loudest part of most laptops, so I don't think it'll be silent. I'm still thinking of getting one... I don't mind a little bit of noise. My main concerns are the battery life and the quality of the keyboard. (If battery life is really only 3 hours, that is a problem for me.)

    38. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's cool but no one cares. Go buy a mac you fag.

    39. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      What benefit would a high spec laptop with Vista have for me? It'd just burn battery and heat up my genitals.

      Considering a Vasectomy costs around $3400.00 you will be saving quite a bit of money.

      See, VISTA is a good thing!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    40. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by dynomitejj · · Score: 0

      How about let's recycle existing laptops and distribute those to people who need it. I've got a laptop (m300) that I bought at the Enron Auction that's worth about 100.00 on ebay, and it would make a real nice linux laptop. What we need is maybe some kind of organized effort to recycle existing machines and distribute those to people who need them. We throw away enough machines to supply a small school... I do anyway... anyone onboard ?

    41. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OLPC is small, light, silent with no moving parts, and has ~8 hours of battery life. I want one for when I go to college. The keyboard might be a little strange though.

    42. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by transporter_ii · · Score: 2, Funny

      > It'd just burn battery and heat up my genitals.

      Dude, that's not a bug, it's a feature.

      Transporter_ii

      --
      Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    43. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Darundal · · Score: 1

      I find myself wondering how well other distros than the one installed (some wacky version of xandros, I believe) will work with the hardware.

    44. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried running Vista with 512mb ram? I had a laptop come in the other day that was the same exact model. While they are cheap, even Vista Basic has a hard time running on it. It was very slow, but not unbearably so. It was definitely slower than if XP would have been on there, and for the average end user, there's very little difference between XP & Vista Basic. Bottom line: I won't recommend a laptop to anyone without 1gb. minimum, but I also push for the 2gb as much as I can. It's often not much more expensive, and it gives you a lot of performance.

    45. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, if i can RDP to my home PC from the road

      Sure, it's running Linux, if it doesn't come with it then just install rdesktop (and tsclient if you need a gui for it).

    46. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Learned diagram sentencing never, though writing I can fine.

    47. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1
      I want a ~$500-$600 laptop with a 12"-13" screen that is 100% Linux (well, Debian|Ubuntu|Knoppix) compatible. By this I mean sound (my Sony desktop isn't supported by ALSA) and WiFi. There are loads of affordable laptops with decent specs, but I can't figure out how to get them to work without a lot of tweaking. Mainly it's the WiFi, of course.

      Yes, it can be done. But what if WiFi is your only internet connection? I want to buy the laptop, drop in Knoppix or Debian, and surf the web at the library or whatever. Right now, I can't, even with Linux Mint.

    48. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      What confuses me as soon as it says "$100 more" is that you are at $299 Yeah, and you pay 150%. That laptop would have to be loads better at the purpose you were buying it for.

      and for another $150 you can wander into BestBuy and splash $450 on a decent laptop that comes with Vista
      If you buy a $200 aim-and-shoot camera then you probably have a budget. You're probably not going for the $450 digital SLR.
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    49. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      they just should have given more internal storage possibilities- they had me till the 4g- I was thinking- cool extra portable super small thing to drag around for cheap- but there isn't much I can do on 4gigs- I have a 4 gig flash drive that is always filling up- I couldn't imagine it on a laptop

    50. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      He said "run" Vista, not crawl.

    51. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I also really like the fact that it has a single-button trackpad (although that might put a few *NIX users off) and a meta key that doesn't have the Windows logo on it.

      The pictures I've seen clearly have a Windows logo on the keyboard. Just saying...

    52. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering what the $199 will become when it get's converted to £ sterling. At the current exchange rate thats £100. I'd snap one up. It's faster than the `old` P3/256MB 13" laptop I currently run kubuntu on. I'm afraid tho it's gonna become £199, still a good deal, but not quite as sweet.

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    53. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knocking $80 or what ever for the OEM version means that you are talking $370 or so for a decent laptop with a decent screen and a decent disk et al and this is for something with a dual core Intel processor.

      You forgot to mention the 90-minute battery life.

      Also, those P4-based dual-core 2060 chips shouldn't be mentioned by anyone, anywhere, ever. It's like Intel is trying to beat AMD at everything, _including_ sucking.

    54. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by dankasfuk · · Score: 1

      Dell XPS 1210 (12.1") with a 256MB Nvidia card can be found for $889 at the Dell outlet...

      --
      Ban Engadget - moderators censor comments!
    55. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      You know, a clamshell notebook that measures maybe 5"x8" when closed
      A Toshiba Libretto wasn't much bigger. And didn't Psion do one about that size?
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    56. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And isn't a laptop, but is a kludged up piece of semi-working pieces cobbled together.

      You might as well have posted a link to a bag of fertilizer, since it's just as close to a laptop as your example.

      Why is it so hard for you idiots to answer the question and not post some link to some stupid irrelevant garbage that's only important to you and a few other socially inept nerds with a dream of someday touching a woman?

    57. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      When I first saw these I knew I wanted one. I HATE PDAs. I don't like input methods that do not involve a keyboard and while the keyboard on this thing is small, it's usable compared to something like a call phone sized on. It's also cheaper than a lot of cell phones. I can tote this around to remodeling jobs and other places that there's no way in hell I'm taking my MacBook to and replace my trusty notepad with something digital.

      And Vista isn't always a plus for people. When I first saw the preview for the Eee, my first thought was, "I wonder if the hardware is all Linux compatible." Had I read two more paragraphs, I would have found out.

    58. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      The 7" runs at 800×480 and the 10" is supposed to be around 1280×768.

      I was originally hot on the idea of the 7", but the 10" is looking really good now. I wonder if there is going to be a decent after market for better batteries. 3 hours is not very good battery life for a computer with no moving parts. It's using older NiCa batteries though. It'd be nice to get a Lithium Ion replacement. Another cool thing is that the RAM in these babies is easily upgradeable. (Although, precisely what I'd be doing with them that would call for more than 512 is beyond me.)

    59. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it so hard for you idiots to answer the question and not post some link to some stupid irrelevant garbage Because somebody misspelled "decent" as the title of a first-person shooter.
    60. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it so difficult for you to get a "descent" joke ?

    61. Re:$450 gets you a decent laptop by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to fine you for that.
      Takes out grammar ticket book and begins writing a rough draft...

  7. Memory? by chill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To all the manufacturers making these small, low-power PCs and notebooks I have one request. Please make the RAM expandable. Put an SO-DIMM slot in there, either in addition to the soldered-on system RAM or as the only system RAM.

    512 Mb is nice, but being able to stick a 2 Gb SO-DIMM in there would make this system useful for so many more people than just their target audience.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Memory? by thePsychologist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're going to use that much RAM then chances are you're using applications that require a lot of processing power. So you'll need more fans and there will be more heat. These laptops are designed for basic and quick tasks like checking email quietly and easily.

      --
      "What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." Ralph Waldo Emerson
    2. Re:Memory? by ABCC · · Score: 1

      RAM expansion could be nice, but given that it has a smaller screen and less/no moving parts than ordinary laptops what I'd really like to see is a longer battery life, 3 hours seems kinda short.

    3. Re:Memory? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      512 Mb is nice, but being able to stick a 2 Gb SO-DIMM in there would make this system useful for so many more people than just their target audience. That's kinda the point of only offering 512MB.
      If you want better, they want you to buy a more expensive laptop.

      It probably wouldn't be a big deal for them to spec a motherboard with a slot, but it might cut into sales of their higher priced laptops and that is unacceptable.

      Businesses like to segment their markets through product differentiation.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Memory? by Bluesman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have nothing to add to your post, but it just struck me that being concerned about "only" having 512MB RAM in a laptop is laugh out loud funny.

      I guess I'm getting old, but I remember doing a ton of stuff with my C64, being thrilled to upgrade my Amiga to 2MB, with a 52MB hard drive. I did 3-d modelling on that Amiga, played great games, and basically did the same things I do today, only in lower resolution.

      Having 512MB of RAM is a godsend, and if I can run Linux or FreeBSD with FVWM, 512MB is more than I'll ever need. Plenty fast enough for work while travelling, or to use as a thin client at home.

      Sign me up for one of these, I love the specs.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    5. Re:Memory? by gig · · Score: 1

      Space and power and cooling for your 2 GB RAM may not be available in there. It might be very hard to disassemble and reassemble just to get at the RAM.

      I think you compare this kind of notebook to a smart phone more than a typical PC. Once you're making something this small that runs on batteries it is just one device. If it doesn't have enough juice for something you want to do, you trade-up to a newer or beefier model. The more integrated and standardized stuff is, the better the resale value, though, the better the software compatibility.

    6. Re:Memory? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I was laughing too. I did my dad to day work until this January on a second hand (~100€) Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook with a P-III 600MHz/512Meg machine and that was perfectly fine for running Windows XP and all the stuff I needed! Never had a real speed problem.

      The only reasons I replaced that machine was because it started to physically break apart. I bought a 15" widescreen laptop on sale for 799€, but I think it's too big to be truly portable. Anything smaller was insanely more expensive.

      A machine like this? I'd take it! Especially at that price point.

      I grew up with a state of the art i286 with 1Meg RAM and (standard) VGA. That was extremely high end! Kids these days, all spoiled ;-)

    7. Re:Memory? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I only had EGA in my 1meg 286 with 40meg hard drive, and mine wasn't state of the art. I chose to have a 286 20MHZ with 1 meg of RAM and EGA plus a 4-color dot matrix printer instead of a 486sx25 with 4 megs of RAM and VGA without the printer. In retrospect, I'm not sure I made the wrong choice since two years later I got a dx4 100 with 16 megs (which I later upgraded to 64) and a 540meg hard drive (which I upgraded to 8.4 gigs). The printer was still about the same price at that point.

      What really burns me is the Wang 2400 bps modem with 9600 bps send and 4800 bps receive fax. I dropped $135 on that. It does still work, though. I tested it out a couple of months ago just out of curiosity.

    8. Re:Memory? by jubei · · Score: 1

      If you're going to use that much RAM then chances are you're using applications that require a lot of processing power.


      Not necessarily. You can often trade ram for other resources, such as CPU or network bandwidth. For example, caching network or disk traffic could make the system seem much faster than it really is.
  8. Yes but the question is by ph4rmb0y · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it run windows? ;)

    1. Re:Yes but the question is by solevita · · Score: 1

      The Windows key is a real nice touch... Makes the mind boggle (although I'm sure you're all intelligent enough to do your own boggling).

    2. Re:Yes but the question is by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure windows 2000 would work fine on this hardware. Asus is still providing drivers for Win2k for their other hardware so I wouldn't imagine drivers would be an issue. Disk space might be a little tight but what do you expect for $200?

    3. Re:Yes but the question is by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      Should this be modded funny or flaimbait? After all, this is /.

    4. Re:Yes but the question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean, will it run World of Warcraft?!

    5. Re:Yes but the question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually yes, it will. It was designed from the beginning to be compatible with Windows XP. Asus will even include Windows XP drivers with the laptop, though what form (SD card? CD?) hasn't been stated. Also the Windows key has been replaced on the latest versions with a Home key.

      Much more up-to-date article can be found here http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=3 829

    6. Re:Yes but the question is by adrian727 · · Score: 1

      Will it blend?

    7. Re:Yes but the question is by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I expect even Windows XP to run fine on it. (Been running XP on P-III class machines with 256Meg to 512Meg RAM, just disable the Fisher Price Theme) The disk space might be the biggest problem, both on XP and W2k.

  9. Worth springing for the 10" screen by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the photos, it looks like the 7" and 10" models use the same case/chassis. The smaller screen just has a giant black bezel around it, taking up the space where the larger screen would go. Although this brings up interesting upgrade possibilities, I think it's fairly obnoxious; I wouldn't mind a 7"-screen laptop if the entire thing were only 7" diagonal (example, something like the Psion Series 7), but a 7" screen in a case that's built for 10" would just annoy me.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which photos were you looking at? The writeup mentions a 10" screen version, but I can't find any reference to it in the article, and none of the photos seems to show one either. Also note that they seem to place the speakers in the display housing, which makes a 10" version less likely (the base is probably also pretty full, and to hit the low price point they definitely don't want too many differences in the designs).

    2. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      ***I wouldn't mind a 7"-screen laptop if the entire thing were only 7" diagonal (example, something like the Psion Series 7), but a 7" screen in a case that's built for 10" would just annoy me.***

      The article criticises the keys as being too small. A narrower PC will make that even worse. If you don't put a substantial bezel around the 7 inch diagonal screen, you are going to end up with a keyboard that can't be used by adults without extreme frustration.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    3. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      i already wouldnt be able to use that keyboard without frustration. a customer i know has a 12" 700m and its god damn tiny already. im not *too* uncomfortable on my T40, but much smaller and i easily would be.

      still for 200 bucks. i might be interested :)

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    4. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      If you've ever owned a Toshiba Libretto (the old Pentium MMX ones, not the newer Pentium M machines) then you know the hell that is touch-typing on a Lilliputian keyboard. The only reason I got rid of my classic Libretto was the keyboard; it was a very handy device otherwise. This Asus notebook looks to be a good bit larger than the Librettos, but still cramped.

    5. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0

      The smaller screen just has a giant black bezel around it, taking up the space where the larger screen would go. Although this brings up interesting upgrade possibilities, I think it's fairly obnoxious; When life gives you lemons - make lemonade. Think of all that extra bezel as a place to put those post-it notes with all your passwords written down.
    6. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      but a 7" screen in a case that's built for 10" would just annoy me.

      Somewhat spoiled, are we not? I still remember the days of CRT when buying a 20 inch screen meant 18.5 inch viewable area and obnoxious thick bezel around it. It was ok.

      The obnoxious thick bezel won't prevent you from seeing what's in the middle, plus a 7 inch laptop would mean too small a keyboard to type comfortably on.

      Basically, I'm sure they thought about it. It's a device not suited to please, but to do the job. As an enabler of interesting possibilities you would risk trying with your $2000 compact laptop (such riding on a bike with it, or giving it to your little kid as a personal PC), I'd say I can live with the bezel.

    7. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by lixee · · Score: 1

      The giant black bezel you're talking about are actually speakers.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    8. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by jubei · · Score: 1

      There are some legitimate reasons why someone would want the 7" screen. That model should weigh less and use about half of the power of the bigger one to light the screen.

    9. Re:Worth springing for the 10" screen by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      It's possible to put a usable -- at least usable by most people -- keyboard on portable computer about this size. Compaq did it in the early 1990s with the Contura-Aeros. there were things wrong with them. For example, the built in trackball was just awful. But the keyboard was OK for most people. I don't think QWERTY keyboards can get much smaller than the Contura's roughly 9x4 inches (24*10cm) without usability issues.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  10. The Specs, summarized by keithjr · · Score: 4, Informative

    900MHz Intel Dothan based Pentium M CPU

    512MB of DDR2 memory

    802.11g wireless capability

    flash-based hard drive ($199 for 4GB, $299 for 8GB)

    weight: .89 kilograms, just around 2 pounds

    Ports:
      four USB 2.0
      VGA output
      10/100 Ethernet
      56K phone modem

    Battery:
      4-cell, estimated 3 hours life

    The lack of an optical drive and the low nonvolatile storage space is a bummer, but flash hard drives are faster and stabler. And as the article states, you can always hook up an external.

    1. Re:The Specs, summarized by AlanS2002 · · Score: 1

      No mention of which GNU/Linux distro it's based off though.

      --
      Not all conservatives are stupid,
      but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
      - Hume
    2. Re:The Specs, summarized by ukatoton · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's running a derivative of xandros:

      http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS4576754329.html

    3. Re:The Specs, summarized by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Screw the optical drive. The Armada M300 I've already mentioned somewhere above doesn't have one (it's in the docking station), and there was exactly one (1) situation when I wished I had it. I don't even use the one in the docking station either, I now just pop the CD/DVD into one of my desktop drives and use the network share to access it. Skipping the CD/DVD drive means thinner laptop plus lower cost and weight, so I'm all for it.

      The 8GB flash drive is a much more limiting factor though, as it means I won't be able to store as much pr0n and warez^W^Wuseful business data.

    4. Re:The Specs, summarized by soupforare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The three hour battery life is much more of a concern to me than any of its other lackings. With its low-po mindset, I was hoping for a lot better than that.
      Hopefully it'll have a standard barrel connector and charging requirements that aren't fancy. :3

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    5. Re:The Specs, summarized by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Flash is, in fact, much slower than a standard hard drive, and most flash is slower than an 8x DVD-R. Only the seek time of flash is faster.

    6. Re:The Specs, summarized by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      My first reaction was 'without an optical drive, how will I install a new OS on it?' Then someone pointed out that it could boot from ISO images on a USB flash drive. My reaction changed immediately to 'I want one.'

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:The Specs, summarized by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Nice specs really. Looks like it'll make not only an excellent internet machine and music/video player (well we're slightly short on space but you can get creative about it).

      But all the popular game emulators will run fine on it, Mame, GameBoy, SEGA. Might make a great little companion for long travel.

    8. Re:The Specs, summarized by jhoger · · Score: 1

      I think it's ridiculous that the battery life on such a machine is only 3 hours.

      On a completely solid state machine? Please...

      Guess my TRS-80 Model 100 hobby is still safe (17 hours of battery life on 4 AA's)

      -- John.

    9. Re:The Specs, summarized by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      something found it's way into the drive slot on my powerbook about a year ago and now any disc that goes in there comes out wrecked. hence I've been using the laptop as though it had no optical drive for 12 months, and like you, I havent missed it at all. I'd love to either have more battery cells in place of it for better battery life, or just have a thinner notebook.

      --
      TIAEAE!
    10. Re:The Specs, summarized by emj · · Score: 1

      Actually to install CD less laptops a much better option is to use netboot install.. It's usually very fast if you have a good connection, and very flexible as long as you have another computer standing by.

    11. Re:The Specs, summarized by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Not to nit pick (ok, so it is to nit pick) but the base of the M300 is called a "Slice" instead of a docking station since the slice is also portable. And Yes I did work for Compaq before the fall. :-) (oops....there I am putting emoticons in official documents again.)

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    12. Re:The Specs, summarized by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      If it takes off well, I'm sure a more powerful battery will be available as an option or in the after-market. I was a bit disappointed at that, too, but there aren't many times I'll need a laptop unplugged for more than an hour, let alone three.

    13. Re:The Specs, summarized by hawk · · Score: 1

      I think I got closer to 20 on my model 102 . . . and several hours on 4 nicads.

      Some folks modded theirs for a 5th battery for the full 6v of the 4 alkalines, but 4.8 was enough, and it lasted much longer than theirs did. (crude math says 25/16 as long :)

      hawk

    14. Re:The Specs, summarized by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction!

      I knew of course that the base was portable since I've used it that way several times, and even the QuickSpecs call it Mobile Expansion Unit. I just didn't realize (because I've never used one of them) that docking stations are much more stationary devices which are probably not supposed to be carried around while attached to the laptop. I don't think I've ever seen the MEU called "Slice" anywhere, so that's an interesting piece of trivia.

      If you, or anyone you know were involved in the M300 development, I think you guys did a pretty good job, since I'm still using one ;-)

    15. Re:The Specs, summarized by jhoger · · Score: 1

      Yeah 17 hours is the conservative number.

      However I do run Remem upgrade http://www.istop.com/~sadolph/remem_home.html
      which uses up some of the power.

      With my 4 D-Cell power "pillow" in the backpack I supposedly can get 200 hours... I've never had to replace the batteries in that though.

      -- John.

    16. Re:The Specs, summarized by hawk · · Score: 1

      Gee, that's tempting. I just need to remember that I haven't used it in years :) But if I get back to writing either of those novels, it could be a perfect distraction-free solution . . .

      hawk

  11. check the linux link on pg 2 by Neuropol · · Score: 1

    Notice on page 2 of the article, that if you mouse over the double underlined "Linux", it pops a Miscrosoft Server add under your mouse.

    1. Re:check the linux link on pg 2 by hazem · · Score: 1

      That only appears to work when running IE. I have noscript and adblock on Firefox and even allowing everything didn't cause the behavior. I had to load up IE on the page to see that ad - and then I saw all the stuff I normally don't see.

      It amazes me when I have to use the internet "naked" with IE or on another person's computer - there's just SO much crap. It makes me wonder how anyone can actually use the internet.

    2. Re:check the linux link on pg 2 by Neuropol · · Score: 1

      this all with firefox ... on linux (ubuntu 7.01)

      it always scares me when people try and tell me (assume) what it was they think i was using before asking.

    3. Re:check the linux link on pg 2 by hazem · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have been more clear about what I meant: "That only appears to work for me when I am running IE".

      I wasn't implying you were running IE.

      I was only reporting my own results as even as I allowed scripts for the various sites one by one, I couldn't get the behavior in Firefox. I was only able to get it when I switched to IE. I then saw all the other crap that I usually don't see.

    4. Re:check the linux link on pg 2 by Neuropol · · Score: 1

      ah. right. no biggie. weird though, huh? i mean, was that even legal?

  12. Wow, imagine a beowulf cluster of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But will it run Linux??

  13. Re:does i run windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know. Does you?

  14. eBook reader by grumbel · · Score: 1

    One of the key points that makes the XO laptop so interesting is that it can be used as a eBook Reader, this thing just looks like a normal laptop, not very comfortable for eBook reading, I'll pass.

  15. still waiting for a daylight-readable display by Per+Bothner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I'm waiting for a compact laptop/hand-held with a daylight-readable display. That's what would make a OLPC clone interesting to me, and as it appears the Asus doesn't have such a display, I'm not interested. (Of course others may find a low-cost light-weight mini-laptop very useful.)

    1. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The problem with OLPC is that they currently have no plans to sell to the public. If you're not a government buying them for weapons^W poor children in lot sizes in the millions, they're not interested.

      I would probably take the XO over this at the same price, but I'm not going to support "blood laptops" any more than I support "blood diamonds". If I can buy this on the open market this fall while Negroponte is still trying to decide if XO is ever going to be available to adults in developed countries, this would make a nice update to my Pentium II laptop instead of getting a Turion or a Core 2 Duo.

      I game on my desktop, but I have no intention of buying a laptop for gaming right now. I just want something small and useful. Ever since my Psion 5mx went away, I've been trying to figure out how small a clamshell machine I can get for not much cash.

    2. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by fliplap · · Score: 2, Informative

      For years NEC produced the Versa Daylite, it came with a trans reflective screen that was specifically designed for outdoor viewing

    3. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The problem with OLPC is that they currently have no plans to sell to the public.

      That's ok, it will be easy enough to get them on ebay.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by gigne · · Score: 1

      vaguely off topic...

      If you are a Psion fan, you might want to keep one eye on project Psion Resurrection which aims to put a Linux powered Gumstix in a psion shell. Cool

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    5. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      "You are bidding on the laptop I am using to create this auction..."

    6. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by delire · · Score: 1

      The problem with OLPC is that they currently have no plans to sell to the public. If you're not a government buying them for weapons^W poor children in lot sizes in the millions, they're not interested.
      Negroponte may not but Quanta - the manufacturers - will.

      Quanta, the company manufacturing the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project's XO laptops, plans to begin selling low-cost budget mobile computers for $200 later this year. According to Quanta president Michael Wang, the company plans to leverage the underlying technologies associated with OLPC's XO laptop to produce laptop computers that are significantly less expensive than conventional laptops.
      If these guys could legally sell you unbranded versions of the Apple MacBook (which they also make) they probably would too..
    7. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised no-one has posted this to Slashdot, but they are reconsidering selling the OLPC commercially:

      http://www.newscientisttech.com/article.ns?id=dn12 339

      Though they are looking at a price point a bit higher than this Asus EEE laptop.

    8. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Yeah but that'll just be a clone for fancy first worlders. I doubt it will be anywhere near as rugged. That's the real killer feature of the XO. Can I kick it through the mud, hose down the keyboard and the display, and still get a shell? When the battery dies, can I use my own power to charge it?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:still waiting for a daylight-readable display by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      ... and hopefully a different color scheme.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  16. Biggest boost ever for Linux desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    $199 is crazily cheap - a LOT of people will buy one of these to "surf the internet and do some typing". Plenty of folk will immediately install bootleg XP on this, but I think the majority will leave Linux running, so long as it "just works".

    1. Re:Biggest boost ever for Linux desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a crappy low-res screen? I don't think so, unless they absolutely can't afford anything else. There's also the problem that they can't put in their CDs and DVDs which further reduces its usefulness.

    2. Re:Biggest boost ever for Linux desktop? by tepples · · Score: 1

      With a crappy low-res screen? The 280x192 pixel resolution of the original Apple II computer didn't stop it, and the 256x192 pixel resolution of each screen of the Nintendo DS Lite Homebrew Edition pocket computer ($169.95) doesn't stop it either.
    3. Re:Biggest boost ever for Linux desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I spent years on a 160*200 screen, and my dad used punch cards. Neither of us would go back to that. You try reading some PDF documents off your DS' screen and see how long it takes before your eyes bleed.

    4. Re:Biggest boost ever for Linux desktop? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The 280x192 pixel resolution of the original Apple II computer didn't stop it, Newsflash, it's not the late 1970s any more and people expect more from a computer these days.

      and the 256x192 pixel resolution of each screen of the Nintendo DS Lite Homebrew Edition pocket computer ($169.95) doesn't stop it either. I'm sure that's a nice toy, and it might even make a good organiser if the software's properly integrated and it doesn't have bits of software dangling off. But it's probably not a replacement for a "real" computer, and I seriously doubt many non-geeks/hobbyists (i.e. "normal" users) have bought one... or even considered one. Or frankly even know that you can play anything more than games on a DS.

      With respect, your examples are silly.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:Biggest boost ever for Linux desktop? by uncreativ · · Score: 1

      I completely agree--at $200 I would buy one to be my carry around computer. I may be rather unique in that I always carry one around with me throughout the day mostlly because of my work.

      I could see college students slipping one in their backback and take it with them to all their classes to take notes. Jesus--it costs less than most absurdy overpriced text books. Let's see, $275 organic chemistry book versus $200 computer that allows me to take my school work wherever I go? Not even close as to what delivers more educational value. And most campuses these days have virtually ubiquitous wifi coverage including in many classrooms/lecture halls.

      I always go with what 12" portable llaptop I can because I value the portability. That's why I like my 12" iBook as it was one of the few affordable 12" laptops. When you go sub 12", you get to pay absurd amounts of money for the portability. This is great--I'll buy one just to take around with me instead of my iBook. I'll probably dual boot with linux and windows xp. I don't need much space--a couple gigs for each OS is just fine by me. It's my portable no nonsense carry around anyway.

  17. Thanks, but no thanks, by huckda · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll take a Nokia N800 for $375 Alex.

    with built in bluetooth, and an ultrasmall form factor, great built-in wireless...ultramobile lovely linux internet tablet.

    and if I don't want to use the touch-screen ultrasharp display...I'll get a 1 handed keyboard from Frogpad.com to connect via bluetooth.

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    1. Re:Thanks, but no thanks, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shit, looks like Asus will have to go back to the drawing board - good thing you noticed another completely unrelated device that's twice as expensive as the one in the article .... phew!

      Don't forget, not everybody has had as much practice at typing one-handed as you!

    2. Re:Thanks, but no thanks, by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I got a ThinkOutside folding bluetooth keyboard to go with my 770. It fits in the same jacket pocket as the 770 itself, and is fine to type on except for numbers. It's a lot better than some laptop keyboards I've used. I've typed several articles on it; having a Vim-capable machine with a decent keyboard in my pocket is a great way of reducing dead time.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Thanks, but no thanks, by jridley · · Score: 1

      Cool. Now what OS does it run? I like to goof around with programming while traveling. Can it run gcc? Cross compile for the AVR microcontroller families? Does it have an even remotely usable keyboard? How many USB ports? Ethernet? Dialup?

      Does it run SSH? How about remote desktop for when things go badly at work while I'm away?

      Honestly, it's twice the cost and wouldn't be in any way useful to me for what I need a portable PC for. It's a toy.

    4. Re:Thanks, but no thanks, by huckda · · Score: 1

      Runs debian based OS...
      not sure on if you compile on the device itself or use the 'sandbox' environment for compiling...many cross compiling things...runs on an ARM processor...
      frogpad.com or most any stowaway bluetooth keyboards work... 1 min-usb, no eithernet...wi-fi only...
      yes it runs openssh....and yes vnc and rdesktop both...

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    5. Re:Thanks, but no thanks, by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      The previous N770 models are on sale at Expansys and the like in the UK for around 80UKP at the moment. Just saying...

    6. Re:Thanks, but no thanks, by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Cool. Now what OS does it run?
      Debian

      I like to goof around with programming while traveling. Can it run gcc?
      Yes.

      Cross compile for the AVR microcontroller families?
      Yes, but the processor isn't beefy, so don't make anything too complicated. USB controller is a strange, dual-mode capable device (host and client), so if you've got a USB on-chip programmer you can use that with it.

      Does it have an even remotely usable keyboard?
      It has no keyboard. When you need one, use a bluetooth or USB one. Frogpad was mentioned for its portability.

      How many USB ports?
      One. Keep in mind that the device is slightly bigger than a Pocket PC. I call it a wide screen pda.

      Ethernet? Dialup?
      No. Sadly, it also includes no ISDN port, floppy drive, parallel port, serial port, or any other kind of port that you'll almost never use.
      Why do you want these for your portable device? Bluetooth and 802.11b/g are the kickers. If you need these things, you've missed the point of owning one of these - it has only what you need for the internet.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    7. Re:Thanks, but no thanks, by jridley · · Score: 1

      I don't necessarily want a little PC for just the internet. In fact, I want one for in the car, where there isn't any internet accessibility anyway. I like to do a little programming, a little reading of books, some writing, etc. Maybe a little working with some media files, which would be easily doable on the Asus with an external drive plugged in. The Asus laptop seems fine for all that. The Nokia, not at all.

      I will need that serial port, for doing microcontroller programming, but I can get that via a USB adaptor. I want ethernet because, honestly, a lot of the time wireless just doesn't work that well. I want dialup because I find myself in areas with no broadband whatsoever a fair amount.

      I don't own any bluetooth stuff, and have no intention of having any. My cell phone is off 99% of the time; it's an emergency only phone, I put about 30 minutes a YEAR on it. And at that, I feel personally that one of the things I have to work on personally is spending less time with technology and more with people.

      Also, there's barely cell service at my house; you have to go outside to get a signal good enough to make a voice call. There's no data service.

  18. I don't want them to. by khasim · · Score: 1

    The more major names that get behind this realization, the better off for the world at large. Average Joe computer user doesn't need a PCIe x16 graphics card. He just doesn't.

    It doesn't matter. If he thinks he does, he'll buy it. Which will drive up the volume and drive down the price.

    Which will make the one I buy a LOT cheaper than if they had not.
  19. What's with the vowels? by 5pp000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    First we get the "Wii", now we have the "Eee". What's next, "Oooeeyaaaeee"???

    --
    Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    1. Re:What's with the vowels? by tepples · · Score: 1

      First we get the "Wii", now we have the "Eee". What's next, "Oooeeyaaaeee"???

      Pocket computer for farmers with GPS for tracking crop yield: EIEIO.

      Pocket computer for nu-metal fans with music player: IEAIAIO.

    2. Re:What's with the vowels? by grcumb · · Score: 1

      First we get the "Wii", now we have the "Eee". What's next, "Oooeeyaaaeee"???

      Actually the next version will be the AAAUUUGGHHHH!

      Same hardware spec, ships with Vista installed.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    3. Re:What's with the vowels? by twitter · · Score: 1

      What's next, "Oooeeyaaaeee"???

      Sounds like a pig. Is that what Steve Ballmer is going to say a flood of $200 gnu/linux laptops drive M$ to bankruptcy?

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    4. Re:What's with the vowels? by andphi · · Score: 1

      I'll have what he's having.

    5. Re:What's with the vowels? by farlukar · · Score: 1

      What's next, "Oooeeyaaaeee"???

      's already been done, sort of: OUI IEEE
      --
      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
  20. they got you covered by nobodyman · · Score: 1

    It has an 4-in-1 memory card reader.

    1. Re:they got you covered by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Although this page has a driver for the O2 Micro 4-in-1, I've never seen a distributution where it worked out of the box. Hope Asus doesn't forget.

    2. Re:they got you covered by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      Don't hold your breath, there's no PCMCIA slot on these laptops. They do have 3 USB ports, modem, ethernet, and VGA out.

    3. Re:they got you covered by Shivani1141 · · Score: 1

      FTFA : The right side panel of the Eee PC 701 has two more USB 2.0 ports, a VGA output, and even a flash card reader. The notebook uses a 4 cell battery that gives it just around 3 hours of battery life when it is on the move. As you may have noticed, there are no optical drives included with the Eee PC, and there is no room to add any to the notebook itself, so any DVD burners will have to be installed externally through one of the Eee PC 701's four USB 2.0 ports. I think grandparent's post is correct, here's to hoping they developed working drivers for their 4-in-1 card reader.

    4. Re:they got you covered by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      I misunderstood the parent to be talking about the O2 Micro reader rather than the one that comes with the Eee. In any case, I've seen my own laptop's card reader work out of the box with a fresh install of Ubuntu.

  21. Want one! (Well, want more than one ...) by timothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been reading about these for several weeks now, and am really looking forward to it. Anyone who remembers the i-Opener (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-Opener) will grin to think that this, while slightly more expensive (less than double, when considering inflation, though -- and it's a laptop!) will come with Linux by default.

    I want one for school: taking notes is such ludicrous misemployment for my main laptop; I cringe each time I carry it back and forth to my law school classes to ... tap out some notes. (I esp. like "View Your Mind" -- I hope that will run nicely on the Eee; on the 7" screen it might be annoying, but Hey, not too bad, I bet.)

    I want one for the car / other travels: portable audio player, and (I hope!) a cool basis for a GPS system using GPS Drive (http://www.gpsdrive.de/) or similar. Can anyone recommend any works-from-the-box GPS modules for a typical Linux system?

    Something this size and price, I'd feel justified to take on nearly any kind of travel -- not so much bigger than the Visor Deluxe stolen from my car a while back plus the portable keyboard for that. (Anyone want to send me a no-longer-used Visor Deluxe, so I could rescue the data from my backup cart? :))

    The screen ... eh, it sucks. Hopefully, the 10" screen version will be out soon after the 7".

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  22. Linux or Windows XP?? by segfaultdot · · Score: 1

    Most of the latter screenshots look like KDE (example), but look at THIS screenshot! It looks like a windows-based antivirus running in windows XP in the foreground with KDE in the background.

    HUH??

    1. Re:Linux or Windows XP?? by JamesRose · · Score: 1

      I think its just someone with really bad taste for style deciding to use that style of border and in silver while the rest of the OS is left in a preset.

    2. Re:Linux or Windows XP?? by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      This is obviously an AntiVirus program running under KDE.
      Don't let the border style fool you.
      Look at the folder icon, look at the form and style of tabs etc.

    3. Re:Linux or Windows XP?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not XP. Note the "Location /" bit of the GUI and the KDE/Qt folder icon next to it. It's just a theme.

    4. Re:Linux or Windows XP?? by Izzy84075 · · Score: 1

      Look at the first image you posted. See the CrossOver menu item? http://www.codeweavers.com/products/

    5. Re:Linux or Windows XP?? by Fizzol · · Score: 1

      That's the standard anti-virus program that comes with Xandros.

    6. Re:Linux or Windows XP?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's definitely the Plastik theme on the front window, with XP clone window decoration. All KDE there. I note in the other screenshot that they seem to have included CrossoverOffice?

  23. Re:does i run windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, but not by default

  24. Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by sylvandb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Twenty years ago I used a Tandy Model 100. Decent keyboard, way too small a display, no moving parts, fairly small and light, and would run a couple of long days on 4xAA batteries. It also had functional applications and a modem built in. Reporters, etc. used them by the thousands. This might actually be a nearly ideal replacement.

    It has a LOT more functionality in a reasonable package.

    Battery life is iffy, but probably adequate.

    Display seems OK. Sunlight is probably an issue.

    But how is the keyboard, really?

    sdb

    1. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by hoppy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe the ink-media laptop based on ARM processor could replace it:

      http://aptustech.com/?q=node/10

      It has a fairly powerfull ARM11 processor clocked at 500MHz with 256MB of RAM and 1GB of flash. 2 SDCard slots for extension are present.
      It should have a lower power consumption than the Asustek based on a x86 processor. End of course it can not run Windows (well it may be running WinCE). It's delivered with Linux.

    2. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by abigor · · Score: 1

      To be perfectly honest, the keyboard on those old Model 100s is nearly unbeatable. They just don't build 'em like they used to - my MacBook has chiclets!

    3. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Wow, I wish I'd known about that one before I submitted the article summary. Now I think I might want one of these... but it's $300 (Canadian, but the Canadian dollar is not as weak compared to the US dollar as it once was). It's an ARM, and there's lots of software for Linux on ARM. It's got twice the battery life, the keyboard looks to detach, and it has dual SD slots.

      Oh, it's a great day when you're deciding between two different sub-$300 ultra-portables.

    4. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by hoppy · · Score: 1

      To be fair, It does not exist actually. First engineering sample (read full of hardware bugs) are supposed to be out in the following weeks. I met a guy from this company and spoke with him a little. I should have more information soon and i will update : http://aptustech.com/?q=node/10

    5. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      To be perfectly honest, the keyboard on those old Model 100s is nearly unbeatable. They just don't build 'em like they used to - my MacBook has chiclets!

      So actually, the problem is that they do build them like they used to.

    6. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

      I've got a working Model 100. Want it?

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    7. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its OS and applications are permanently embedded in the hardware, unable to be accessed or written to by malicious scripts."
      So the user can't replace/ update them or anything? A shame :(
    8. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by abigor · · Score: 1

      Well, that is very tempting offer, but I'm kind of unsure how I'd hook it up to my MacBook to move text off of it. Also, I hear it has a Y2K bug?

    9. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

      This site seems to have some information on file transfer.

      I don't know about the Y2K bug. I haven't actually used the machine in many years; all I've done is occasionally verify that it's still working and wonder whether it's worth anything to anybody :)

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    10. Re:Getting closer to replacing the Tandy Model 100 by abigor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would be cool to have, but to transfer files you seem to need a modem or RS-232 port, and the MacBooks don't have those. Plus the transfer software seems to be Windows (actually DOS) only. A bit sad, since it would be a handy thing to have sometimes when traveling, but only if I could upload my text somehow at internet cafes or whatever. I really wish a similar form-factor machine - full-sized keyboard made for typing, text-oriented display, tons of uptime on just a few AA batteries, USB ports for plugging a memory key into - would hit the market.

      Anyway, thanks for the offer! And I would say it is worth something - check out that club100 site for used Model 100 prices.

  25. Sure... by Bluesman · · Score: 0

    ...but will it run FreeBSD?

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    1. Re:Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they've saved money by using an existing coffin design for the case, then yes. It will fit well.

    2. Re:Sure... by Jorophose · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows BSD is dead. Netcraft confirmed it!

    3. Re:Sure... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Should do. The graphics hardware is Intel, and with the FreeBSD DRI maintainer working at Intel it's pretty well supported. The WiFi card uses an Atheros chip, and these are very well supported by OpenBSD, and I think the OpenBSD driver has now been ported to FreeBSD. If it hasn't you might be stuck with a blob.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  26. Re:does i run windows? by sylvandb · · Score: 1

    RTFA !

  27. Re:$899 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  28. Re:does i run windows? by snoyberg · · Score: 1

    Yep, but not by default

    I know this thread is a joke, but the fact is, once Windows "isn't there by default" it's no longer an easy OS. Users will have to find all the correct drivers, etc. Even if this machine could handle Windows, I think most users would find sticking with the default much easier.

    --
    Thank God for evolution.
  29. Re:$899 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to quibble, but wouldn't that be $898, rather than $899?

  30. This is more in the class of ultra portable by lumierang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    instead of a common laptop. This is not intended as a desktop replacement that needs to be placed on a desk to comfortably use, it is a truly portable pc as a complement to your beefy pc that you can slap out anywhere ,any time, in the class,on the bus, sitting , standing, you name it. With a weight of 2lb, I can comfortably hold this baby with one hand for extended length of time. It will be perfect for me as a student to put in my book bag. And for taking notes, writing papers , surfing the net, checking email,you don't need a bloated modern laptop(most can burn you if you try to use on you lap)weighting more than 6 lb, with screaming dual core intel processor and wide screen lcd. And if I want some heavy lifting I can easily ssh to my desktop. I have been wanting something like this for a long time, and the only alternatives before is the tablets like the thinkpad X series with a price tag easily over 1k$,as a poor student I can hardly afford. The EEE is just priced right for me, I will happily snatch one at launch.

  31. Dead Quiet by ShawnCplus · · Score: 1

    Tiny Linux laptop + Dead Quiet = Linux ninja

    --
    Excuse me while I gather the virgin sacrifice and assemble the pentagram required to solve your problem
  32. Great for road warriors by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    For people on the road fixing stuff for a living this would be a great improvement over most of the overly large and overkill laptops you have to shove in your bag now. ( at least for ones that have to pay for their own hardware ).

    You really dont need much hardware to RDP/X11 a server, check a network, or hook to a diag port on a router.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  33. will Asus really deliver soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am quite ecstatic to be able to buy laptop(s) from Asus from $199, but will they really deliver on time? We haven't heard anything from them since early June.

  34. Diminishing returns? by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Are we reaching the point on laptop prices where cheaper laptops are not feasible simply due to administrative costs? Consider these examples. Apple puts together an iPhone, and it likely costs $150 to build. They didn't use the cheapest parts but you know they did get a good price. This laptops looks like an emate, and an in inflation adjusted numbers costs only a little less. MS, who does not even need to make money, cannot put together a media player for less than $200. Each component may be cheap, but there is cost in ordering, receiving, qualifying, assembling, and verifying. Each component that is added, each new solder joint, increases the costs nonlinearly. How much did Apple save by not making the battery removable? If one has a device with 10 components, is it possible to engineer, assemble and ship the device for less $200 even if the components are next to nothing?

    The point we are at right now is that there has been little advance in merging components. Computers got cheap, in part, to VLSI. Now, instead of creating a single chip laptop, we have dual cores. To get to the holy grail of the computer so cheap that we buy it for no reason, the device count has to go way down. A couple chips, a couple ports, and a screen. It may even have to have a fake keyboard, just like the cheap computers of the 80's, which, btw, were also just a few chips and few ports.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Diminishing returns? by spacefrog · · Score: 2, Informative

      This laptops looks like an emate, and an in inflation adjusted numbers costs only a little less.
      Oh Really? "The eMate was introduced March 7, 1997, for US$800"

      According to The Inflation Calculator: "What cost $800 in 1997 would cost $994.00 in 2006." 2006 is the latest year they will calculate for.
    2. Re:Diminishing returns? by wytcld · · Score: 1

      That's a curious question, but how do you count "each component." There's a CD/cassette/AM/FM stereo boombox down at the drug store for fifty bucks. Fifteen years ago all those "components" in one box cost over $200, and just a few years ago was still beyond $100. In a sense "CD/cassette/AM/FM stereo boombox" could be said to have become a single component. But then "sublaptop" soon will be in that category to. Unless you're limited by the cost of some rare and necessary mineral - if it's most all assembly costs - we should have these for $50 within a decade - not even inflation adjusted.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    3. Re:Diminishing returns? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      It may even have to have a fake keyboard, just like the cheap computers of the 80's, which, btw, were also just a few chips and few ports. What's a "fake keyboard"? Is that like the ZX81's touch-sensitive thing?

      New ZX81-sized thing for bugger all? That'd be cool :)
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Diminishing returns? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      I think you're right in that the more components there are to a system, the higher the price of assembly. So putting everything on a single chip (to the extent possible) would save costs. Doing so has another advantage as well: power consumption should be lower.

      On the other hand, the more you put on one chip, the less modular your solution is. At some point, you will cross the border between mass-produced commodity chips and chips custom manufactured for your device. This drives up the cost of manufacturing as well as the design cost. So, presumably, there is a certain optimal degree of integration where the cost of your device as a whole is lowest.

      What is interesting is that the open source model might be able to shift the optimum by lowering design cost. At OPENCORES.ORG, a growing number of chip designs are freely available. Many of these are modular and can be combined with one another. Conceivably, manufacturers would one day be able to grab designs for the functionality they need from the web, combine them, and (after testing) start baking chips.

      Another interesting development comes from chip manufacturers, specifically those who make FPGAs and the like. The basic concept of a chip that can be mass-manufactured and then customized to do whatever you need is already exciting. FPGAs are an example of this. Unfortunately, FPGAs introduce quite some overhead and thus don't quite get the performance of real custom chips (not unlike interpreting bytecode vs. generating native code). Having said that, FPGA solutions beat custom chips on price and general purpose chips on performance (unless, of course, the task is to build a general-purpose chip). Increasingly, FPGA manufacturers are putting specialized chips on their FPGAs, such as PowerPC cores or Ethernet controllers. This obviously gives lower design cost and higher performance than having to create these components using the FPGA.

      If you want to go completely crazy, you can even reprogram certain FPGAs at run-time, and thus optimize the chip for the task you happen to be performing. This is a topic I wanted to research in university, but didn't have time for. However, even if it is a pipe dream, it still sounds very cool. ;-)

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    5. Re:Diminishing returns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computers don't work like that. My $1000 newton is now a $500 iPhone. My $4000+ powerbook is now a $2000- powerbook. So an Emate would be under $400. Still not the $150, but take up the alleged 50% apple markup, and it is right around the price for which tiny screen ultra cheap laptops are selling.

  35. Only problem is the screen size. by Qwavel · · Score: 1

    7" is way too small. Even 10" is too small. There should be a 12 or 14" option for $299.

    The other limitations - no optical and only 4GB storage - are not a problem in my opinion.

    1. Re:Only problem is the screen size. by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      7" is way too small. Contrary to what some people think, 7" is slightly above average and nothing to be ashamed about.

      Even 10" is too small. Whoah... talk about high standards. Is this for yourself or what you're looking for in another guy? What a size queen...

      There should be a 12 or 14" option for $299. Now you're just getting silly. Even the most outlandish spam doesn't promise that much, and who really wants 14" when it comes down to it? Given the choice, I'd stick with the 10".
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  36. For those interested in the Medison saga by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since it was mentioned in the summary, there's a new blog following the whole fiasco at http://medisonscam.blogspot.com/

    Some interesting highlights from the last few days:

    The old product pictures has been replaced on Medisons site. According to Comon.dk Medison have foretold that they were replaced by "real" pictures to get more trustworthy. They say that they have hired a professional photographer to take the pictures. The question however, is why a professional photographer would use a Canon Digital IXUS 60 digital camera at 10 in the evening (See the Exif-tags in the pictures). That is for those who don't know a small compact consumer camera... Yes we know that this doesn't "prove" anything, it's just another "fun fact" in this story.

    A poster on SweClockers posted the following answer that is supposed to be from the manufacturer: "they got one pcs sample from our customer and not paid". Hmm, interesting, isn't it?

    According to the Danish site Comon.dk, Medison will have a press conference on Wednesday to clear things out. They have also spoken with several people in the computer industry that claims, just like all other experts, that the price is "impossible".


    The Asus Eee offer however is great I'm looking forward to their machine. You shouldn't look at this laptop from the perspective of using it as full blown desktop Machine. Consider all the stuff you get at mere $200, for a nice mobile computer with full-sized keyboard and rich internet abilities. It makes for far better browsing/mail checking than what you can do on your $600 iPhone.

  37. Re:does i run windows? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1, Funny

    The memory/drive/screen size may be too limiting for windows.

    But I've never had a driver problem installing windows. The last time I did a windows install was w2k, but I had no problems installing it on my custom built computer or a compaq. The same computer, with the same hardware, Red Hat 4 wouldn't install, and after installing red hat 5, I had to recompile with mouse support. Metro X had some display problems and I needed to get an updated driver for xfree86 to support my card (Matrox Millenium II). BeOS didn't need any extra drivers (I intentionally purchased equipment they supported).

    Find the correct drivers = insert the windows CD.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  38. Two linux laptops in one day? :) by GeekyGuy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Guys, do you actually have to buy one with Linux pre-installed or how about just buying A laptop and installing Linux yourself?

    1. Re:Two linux laptops in one day? :) by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I could go out and buy a 6 pound laptop with Windows on it for $500, fdisk it, and install Linux. I could buy this thing, which is 2 pounds, and then choose whether to keep the installation that's on it or install a different Linux distro on it for $199.

      So while you're being all cute about actually being technically competent enough to install Fedora or Ubuntu, I'll have saved myself enough money to buy a Wii and some games, or a second laptop for my wife so she's not sharing mine. I'll also be able to pack it into a carry-on with other stuff rather than calling my laptop bag a carry-on by itself.

      This is Slashdot, and while it might be funny to claim you're the most technically gifted one around or the most old-school hacker on the site, those odds are pretty slim, Mr. 1135037. So go ahead and pay your Microsoft tax, lug around a 6 pound laptop you paid more for than you should have, ridicule those people who think preloaded Linux is the best way to grow Linux desktop use, and make fun of everyone who has a sense of convenience or frugality. We'll just be over here -->, chuckling about how 31337 you must be to make the observation that Linux can be installed at home on Slashdot.

  39. Matias Half Keyboard by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you don't put a substantial bezel around the 7 inch diagonal screen, you are going to end up with a keyboard that can't be used by adults without extreme frustration. Citation needed that a one-handed keyboard causes extreme frustration.
    1. Re:Matias Half Keyboard by RockWolf · · Score: 1
      Quoted from the TFWebsite:

      Now your other hand is always free when you need it.

      Useful, no?

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  40. Sounds good, but... by gshakhn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Overall, this sounds like an amazing computer for school. About 2 pounds? That small? Awesome. However, I've got a few questions.

    How easy is it to install additional programs? I'd assume they'd attempt to limit that in the basic interface, with only a few choices from preselected packages. With the advanced interface though, can you install anything you want? Do you get access to the terminal? Is there apt, yum? Something similar to Synaptic so you don't have to use the terminal? Only packages approved by Asus, or can you access any repository you want?

    It says that the laptop is Windows compatible. I assume this means that the user can install another OS by themselves. With lack of an optical drive though, will it boot from the USB to install? What about drivers, such as for the webcam?

    All in all, it sounds like a great deal. The small screen bugs me a bit, but what do you expect for the size?

    --
    Consciousness - That annoying time between naps.
    1. Re:Sounds good, but... by mmxsaro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would say that, considering most Asus motherboards allow you to boot off virtually anything USB these days; yes, you should be able to hook up an external optical drive and reinstall as you please.

    2. Re:Sounds good, but... by Fizzol · · Score: 2, Informative

      By all appearences it's a trimmed down version of Xandros (based on Debian) Linux. Xandros Networks is a GUI front end for apt-get and should allow you to install most anything you care too. Synaptic is available too if you prefer that, again assuming it's basically the same as the full-size Xandros.

    3. Re:Sounds good, but... by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      How easy is it to install additional programs?

      You probably know already, so the following is for others who might be interested: the Eee has 10/100 Mbit Ethernet, so you can simply plug the laptop into your cable or ADSL modem. Then you can download any software you want from any of the Debian Linux mirrors. Debian has a ton of free software available. I should know: I'm running it right now!

  41. Extend the WIkipedia entry on this machine :) by timothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a decent entry already (with plentiful links to other articles etc) already up. Since Wikipedia allows a different kind of information aggregation than does Slashdot, I hope lots of people (accurately ;)) extend what's there.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASUS_Eee_PC

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Extend the WIkipedia entry on this machine :) by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia allows a different kind of information aggregation than does Slashdot [citation needed]
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  42. Re:Why? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    So our computer habit does not impact our pot smoking habit, because we're all smelly dirty hippies!

    but seriously, I'd like a little "beater" laptop to drag around instead of worrying about damaging my $1200 laptop. plus smaller is better when it comes to portability. (although smaller isn't usually easier to use for extended periods of time)

    "The ASUS Eee PC is expected to be available, worldwide, in full production quantities by this fall. It is rumored to have a street date of mid-August, and will likely be one of the hottest selling computers in recent history, come the holiday shopping season."

    I think I would add "for ASUS" in terms of hottest selling computers. I don't think it will take off like other systems. But honestly I might get one for my fiance so she can use it for writing her novels, instead of having to drag a big laptop around (which she refuses to do) or only work on her novel on her desktop (which she is starting to dislike).

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  43. The keyboard... by mathfeel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have you guys notice?

    It comes with linux by default, yet its keyboard has the regular "windows flag" key...Wouldn't it make more sense to print a penguin on it instead?

    Just my 50-cents (thickness of the device)

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    1. Re:The keyboard... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      "It comes with linux by default, yet its keyboard has the regular "windows flag" key...Wouldn't it make more sense to print a penguin on it instead?"

      It will be a lot easier for Linux to embrace the masses if it doesn't confuse them.

    2. Re:The keyboard... by Jorophose · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just like a prototype and they'll change the keys in the final runs?

      That said, remove the windows keys, or printing penguins would be great; they would even print like a styled "K" or the Gnome foot, or maybe just a Xandros-style X. (Poor choice by the way ASUS, Debian, Xubuntu 6.06.1, or heck even Freespire would have been much better)

    3. Re:The keyboard... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't RTFA, but I've R'd several other FAs about this and most of the pictures showed the meta ('windows') key having a circle and square logo on it. There were reports that some of the early prototypes had a windows flag on their meta key, but this was fixed in the later ones. It does, however, have a single-button trackpad, which I consider a win for usability, but some Linux users may not care for (the supplied environment is tailored for single-button use, but if you want to put GNOME or KDE on it you might have problems).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:The keyboard... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      I don't want a penguin either. How about a (gasp) word. Like "meta". Then people might be able to instruct other people how to operate the computer over the phone or email or in print without going through weird contortions trying to identify this key. If they have that other key Microsoft added, try printing "menu" on it.

    5. Re:The keyboard... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You know how all the drive-up ATMs have braille buttons on them, because the manufacturers find it's simpler just to use the same keypads they install on the walk-up ATMs? This is probably one of those things. I'd be a bit disappointed if it really were just a stupid convention run amok.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    6. Re:The keyboard... by nickos · · Score: 1

      It does, however, have a single-button trackpad
      Dammit - they were doing so well. I suspect that decision will cost them a lot of potential customers...
  44. Re:does i run windows? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But I've never had a driver problem installing windows. The last time I did a windows install was w2k, but I had no problems installing it on my custom built computer or a compaq. The same computer, with the same hardware, Red Hat 4 wouldn't install, and after installing red hat 5, I had to recompile with mouse support.
    ...


    Find the correct drivers = insert the windows CD.

    I had a refurb Compaq laptop... it came with WinME. I had an option to pre-buy XP for it. I wanted Win2K and, in fact, had an unused license already. So I took my bargain laptop home and tried to install Win2K. It was a nightmare hunting down drivers for the damn thing. Since Compaq did not support Win2K on that particular model, I had to hunt down which obfuscated drivers fit those particular chips on other Compaq models... install those... and hope they worked. Or find OEM versions. Eventually I got everything running (more or less).

    I also got a copy of Mandrake (back when it was Mandrake). Installed it as a dual-boot. Everything worked first shot, out of the box.

    I was rather amused. Usually laptop hardware has given me fits with Linux (one time I went through 3 distros before finding one that was happy out-of-box). This was the first time I had trouble with Windows and no trouble with Linux. It really drove home the importance of OEM support for any OS.
  45. Search over by VonSkippy · · Score: 1

    There:

    http://www.officedepot.com/ddSKU.do?level=SK&id=66 2330&N=265454&An=browse

    Search over.

    If that's not "cheap enough", I'd say getting a new laptop should be on the bottom of your "things to buy" list.

    1. Re:Search over by jridley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's cheap enough, but it's not small enough. I have a laptop with a 15" screen, I paid over $2000 for it. I never use it because it's too damn big. It has actually sat in my closet for over a year at a time. I don't even take it with me on vacations anymore because it's just too big to bother with.

      This laptop is sufficient for my needs, and I'm likely to actually carry it because it's small and light enough to be reasonably carried around most everywhere.

    2. Re:Search over by mattis_f · · Score: 1

      That machine you linked to is a 15.4" widescreen monster. I'd ruin my back carrying that around.

      I'm definitely buying a 10" Eee when it comes out - for me the ultra small form factor is a basic requirement. Then it also has a video-camera, it's quiet, decent battery-time, compact flash reader...

      I refuse to even consider any laptops over 3 pounds. Since I mostly program in Emacs, browse the web or read emails, speed is not all that important - most any computer available today can do what I need.

      I know a lot of non-geeks who reason in a similar way.

    3. Re:Search over by VonSkippy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the headline should have read: "In search of a SMALL and cheap Linux Laptop".

    4. Re:Search over by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      But it weighs 6.6 pounds, which makes my 15" MacBook Pro look like a lightweight.

      Still, if a person didn't need to move it around very much (if at all), it might be an acceptable low-cost notebook. The one caveat I'd put on this is that my cousin's son has a low-end Compaq notebook (looks similar to that one, but probably older; don't know what model it is), and it's basically a piece of crap. Fit, finish, feel of the keyboard, they're all awful. I'm not really blaming Compaq, that's what you get when you buy the bottom of the line; they have to get it that cheap somehow, and to make a "regular" notebook that can sell in that price range you have to cut a lot of corners.

      These Asus laptops, OLPC, etc, cut different corners. Take out the hard drive, put in a a pretty low-spec graphics chipset, very modest CPU, etc., and you can deliver better build quality (well, we hope) while still maintaining a very low price point.

    5. Re:Search over by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      It costs twice as much, weighs three times as much, and uses quite a bit more power due to a larger screen, a hard drive, an optical drive, a faster CPU, etc. I'm not sure how you see them in the same category of products.

  46. Awesome! by jridley · · Score: 1

    I was just complaining that I couldn't find a laptop that actually meets my travel needs. All I need is something to check email, do a little web browsing, and maybe view photos and do a little remote SSH to take care of problems at work. I have a laptop but hate to carry it because it's too big.

    This is actually exactly what I've been looking for. I'm so in line for this.

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sharp Zaurus, anyone?

    2. Re:Awesome! by jridley · · Score: 1

      Screen too small, no keyboard, no standard ports (USB, ethernet, dialup)

      I've got a PDA. I never use it. I'm not looking for a PDA, I'm looking for a modest, small, light PC. The Zaurus is not it.

      I don't see a price easily available, but I'm betting it's more than $199.

  47. SImilar: Via NanoBook by timothy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Linked from the Eee page at Wikipedia, I just found this (mostly) similarly equipped laptop upcoming from VIA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NanoBook

    It uses a conventional hard drive, but also claims greater battery life. Also a 7" screen, but uses the space differently -- from the description and the way the photo looks (prototype?), I guess that's a trackpad next to the screen. Price will be "agressive," says that page, but it would have to be damn near ferocious to beat the $200 one from Asus ... assuming that stays $200, not $279+shipping or something.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:SImilar: Via NanoBook by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it uses a Via Unichrome graphics chipset, which is nowhere near as well supported under open source operating systems as the Intel chipset used in the Eee. If there are any X developers not already working for Intel, I'd suggest Via think about hiring some of them...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:SImilar: Via NanoBook by timothy · · Score: 1

      Good point! Via seemed pretty Linux friendly (not saying they're not now, just haven't been following) for a while, when their tiny all-in-one-motherboards were the best deal going in small / power-efficient computers. I hope they follow your advice when it comes to hiring some X developers.

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    3. Re:SImilar: Via NanoBook by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 2, Informative

      Price will be "agressive," says that page, but it would have to be damn near ferocious to beat the $200 one from Asus ... assuming that stays $200, not $279+shipping or something. According to this article on engadget, the nanobook will clock in at $600. Not bad for all you get, but not really comparable to the Eee.
  48. I'm going to use it as a server. by renfrow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Forget using it as a laptop, I'm going to use it as the house server. Get it set up, make the system card read-only and stick it in a closet with 1+ USB drives, it's quiet and low heat. If you need to see the 'console' pop the lid and there it is.

    Tom.

    1. Re:I'm going to use it as a server. by R3 · · Score: 1

      ...or spend half as much (~$90 on Amazon) and get Linksys Slug (NSLU2).
      If you crave wireless, WRTSL54GS fits the bill too.
      Granted, you get no screen, but you can always ssh into it if you need to.

  49. Web Apps by BarneyRubble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With the increasing number of quality web apps (gmail, google docs, meebo, facebook) A small computer
    that can run firefox would be really useful. Obviously requires a good net connection. So many peoples
    use of a computer now falls into wordprocessor + email + web browsing for which a small portable computer
      is fine. And with the rise of web apps it is increasily becoming just web access thats required.

  50. What a perfect opportunity... by Undead+Ed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here we have a brand new low cost platform that comes preinstalled with Linux. All the ney-sayers are simply yelling sour grapes because Microsoft will not be able to field anything like this in North America or Europe in the foreseeable future.

    I am going to buy two for my grandkids - they will love it. They'll be able to play music and TV off the home wireless network. They can VoIP with video using Skype. They can read books from Project Gutenberg. They can message and chat to their hearts content. Hey, they may even do some homework and learn something, Who Knows!

    For me, I can add a 22" LCD monitor and create a wireless multimedia node for the bedroom. I can also use it as a smart thin client with USB keyboard & mouse and some speakers.

    Add some external storage like a 2.5" 120 gig HD and some earbuds and I can listen to music or avi's until the batteries wear down. I can store all my contact information and write some emails, Skype some friends (VoIP with video), message, play games and chat for hours away from my desktop computer.

    This machine is great and I for one am going to promote it to all my friends including the ones that are afraid of computers.

    What a great standby machine!

    Just so you know, I have 3 laptop computers 'Dell Inspiron 5100 - big, hot and heavy', 'Toshiba Tecra 8200 - smaller, lighter but tied to the power supply now' and 'Dell Latitude CPx - nice but slow, also tied to the power adapter'. These machines, for one reason or another, are unsuitable for newbs and kids whereas the Asus 3ePC looks perfect.

    I have no problem with the screen layout the way it is - there are speakers on either side of the screen and a microphone and camera there as well.

    All that power, connectivity (WiFi b/g, Ethernet 10/100, modem and USB), excellent memory - 512 meg, sufficient storage with USB addons as required, stereo speakers, microphone, web camera, 3 hours on battery AND it comes with an OS with a FULL office suite, Firefox, Skype, email and lots of applications!

    All for $199!

    LOOK OUT MICROSOFT!!!

    This is the killer product Linux needs to get it's foot in the door - this machines will sell in all the usual outlets plus drug stores, gift shops and grocery markets if promoted properly and Asus may be the guys to do it.

    Yep - put XP on that thing and it will be a pig with no room left for anything else. With a light-weight Linux, perhaps Ubunto or Kubunto or even Slax, and the user may really haved something.

    This is just my two-bits but I am excited.

    Undead Ed

    1. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Wicko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are a few exceptions to your statement about XP, using nLite to reduce your XP image to only essentials, or look for TinyXP, (assuming you own XP already, ;) ) and you will hardly use up any space at all.. a version of TinyXP that I have is 150MB. Haven't used it yet so I have no idea what its size is uncompressed, but it certainly won't be that bad. A solution for those of us who don't want to be stuck with Linux.

    2. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going to buy two for my grandkids - they will love it. They'll be able to play music and TV off the home wireless network. They can VoIP with video using Skype. They can read books from Project Gutenberg. They can message and chat to their hearts content. Hey, they may even do some homework and learn something, Who Knows!
      Forgot to mention this.
    3. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by gujo-odori · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This does look very cool. My kids (ages 3 and 4) are already using Linux to play NickJr games, Gcompris stuff, etc. I have them set up with desktop machines with happy hacking-type keyboards and notebook mice to better fit the size of their hands, but these notebooks might be better still. Toddlers have a way of dragging things around to screw up their KDE environment in interesting ways, or clicking the Firefox launch button so many times that it runs the system out of memory

    4. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Undead+Ed · · Score: 1

      Stuck with Linux? Are you kidding?

      I can afford to buy any software I want but I choose Linux and Open Source.

      In case you haven't heard, Microsoft is a horrendous predatory that is working to destroy free choice. Why would I want to support a company like that?

      Only XP essentials? Like what? No 10,000+ files nested under Documents?

      How do you keep it updated?

      Who supports it? Certainley not Microsoft.

      And in the end, why would I spend all that money for XP when Linux is superior?

      Don't believe what you read about the small number of Linux desktop users - its not true. Microsoft believes that by trivializing Linux that it can discourage Linux's continued growth.

      The Asus eeePC 701 is just another step forward for Desktop Linux.

      Sorry dude, I am all about free choice.

      Undead Ed

    5. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by castrox · · Score: 1

      I completely sympathize with your opinion. But my opinion is that Windows XP can be faster than the Ubuntu-dists are. Let's not kid ourselves; the Ubuntu desktop uses lots of memory as well. (And from running Vista at work I can say that it must have at least 2 gigs to be usable.)

      I run Gentoo. It's hardly lightweight but that's because I run KDE and on top of that, tons of apps. I've got the memory to support it, however.

      So, putting Windows XP on this laptop will properly function just as well as e.g. Ubuntu but it'll add to the cost of course.

      --
      Fight for your digital freedom, join the EFF *now*: http://www.eff.org/support/
    6. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Wicko · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I think you misunderstood my statement. I wasn't suggesting that YOU should use XP. But there are those of us who would like to use it, like me, who already own 2 copies of XP (I get special deals through my university in which I basically get them for free anyway).

      Updating is easy, you just don't remove that service. Microsoft cannot tell the difference between a regular copy and a slimmed down copy using the same serial number, assuming its a legal copy (hell, there are illegal copies floating around that actually update and pass WGA). And it is perfectly legal to use nLite on your image. In short, there are no limitations to TinyXP that don't already exist with retail XP with regards to support. Capability, well, thats for the end user to decide which services he wants to keep. Also, with nLite, you can slipstream hotfixes on the disc itself, so you can have all the current updates. Then again, if you know what you're doing, you don't really need those updates.

      I don't know where you are getting this 10 000 files idea from, I'm sure its an exageration. I currently have 3 000 (260MB) in mine. And I've had this installation of XP running for a couple years now. Most of those files are thanks to all the programs I have installed, about 100 or so. Games like to throw their data in there. But there are nice little utilities out there, like CCleaner, cleans out all the temp files.

      Don't worry, I have nothing against Linux, I just want people to know they don't have to use it if they don't want to. I should know that the small number of linux users is garbage, I'm a 4th year Comp Sci major, a sizeable amount of people use linux. But some also use Windows. Personally, I've tried fedora and Ubuntu on my PC, but have had issues with them, mainly driver problems, but I guess thats expected. I haven't given up, but I see no reason to abandon XP for linux. Superiority is a matter of opinion I guess, so I won't argue with you there. BTW, I have given MS a grand total of 7 dollars, lol.

      All in all, I am excited to see more linux options. I would love to see linux take a large chunk out of the MS user base. But as it stands, they can't take a bite out of my user base. I belong to the gamer user base, not only that but I'm also striving to be a game coder (currently I use openGL, but I am interested in using DX, considering its popularity). I don't agree with MS's practices but I won't lie and say I don't like their OS. I wouldn't ask for this Asus Eee to come with XP, trust me, I don't like paying the MS tax either :)

    7. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      This is why there will never be a linux desktop. It's because nobody really wants to pay for it. Like you say, if the operating system was free then MS would have no reason to exist.

      Let me tell you something, people like MS because they spend their time trying (and not always succeding) on making those little support issues go away. They also cause many headaches, but for the COMMON user, they actually let them do REAL work. Linux not so much. Also dirt cheap laptops made in a foreign country with no support don't make for the best user experience. They don't have Apple's Genius Bar, a person to call and wait 3 hours on the phone with to 'help' you or even a decent support website. Most of the time these cheapo laptop guys barely have a person on email.

      You do get what you pay for, and at this price point it's just the laptop.

    8. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Yosho · · Score: 1

      BTW, I have given MS a grand total of 7 dollars, lol.

      Assuming you obtained Windows legally: no you haven't. The site license your college has with Microsoft isn't free -- and they're paying for it using your tuition. The sad truth is that you (and every other student there) has already paid Microsoft for Windows, and you have to cough up a few more dollars before they'll actually let you have the disc.

      Also, you should probably review the terms of agreement that you agreed to when you got that disc. It's more than likely that you're not legally allowed to use it after you're no longer a student.

      I belong to the gamer user base

      You have to realize that the laptops under discussion are very low-end. You won't be doing any serious gaming at all with them. If you discount games, why would you want to run a stripped-down version of Windows rather than Linux? Many older games either have Linux ports or run just fine through Wine, anyway.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    9. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Undead+Ed · · Score: 1

      "I don't know where you are getting this 10 000 files idea from, I'm sure its an exageration. I currently have 3 000 (260MB) in mine."

      Yes it was an exageration, the point being that a brand new fresh XP install creates a nest of files (1000s) that defies explanation - I just love the logic security and neatness of Unix/Linux /home system compared to XP,

      "I've tried fedora and Ubuntu on my PC, but have had issues with them, mainly driver problems, but I guess thats expected."

      I have also had driver/hardware issues installing XP - I can't count the number of times I have had to resort to using a Linux live CD in order to identify and test hardware and then begin trying to find a current XP driver. I recently had a HP desktop running a P4 2.4 GHz absolutely refuse to load the sound driver from either HP or Microsoft - the loader kept complaining that a Windows hi-def audio function was missing. I contacted both HP and Windows and No Joy (HP wanted to replace the motherboard 'it was out of warranty') and Microsoft kept sending me back to HP. Long story short, running a Slax Live CD confirmed the sound was working and quite frankly loaded drivers for everything without having to go looking. I ended up just installing a $12 sound card and taped over the onboard sound connectors.

      "I see no reason to abandon XP for linux"

      It's about mindshare - Microsoft has won if you use Windows, install Windows for friends, develop for Windows, work and play with Windows.

      I used to be a DOS/Windows IT admin who kept almost a hundred desktops and network services up and running in the early 90s - talk about job security! I used to deal with Microsoft almost every day by phone and fax and sometimes in person. The money was great and my clients would have me out for dinners and parties - my services were respected and appreciated. The problem was, No Job Satisfaction! And I was being worn out running all over town night and day fighting fires.

      I had no personal life, my youngest daughter would complain bitterly when my beeper would go off in the evening or on the weekend. Do not get me wrong, the money was great and I had total job security. Windows would crash and regularly trash the filesystem and I would re-install and restore - that was my job.

      I started deploying Linux in 1995 quite by accident - I won't go into details but I needed a networked fax server for a score of W95 desktops and Microsoft and WinFAX had let me down once again. Out of desperation I bought and installed a Slackware book with CD and working over a weekend created a fax server that didn't crash under load. I also had to learn a dozen different configuration techniques - every app and utility had it's own configuration text file and methodology. It almost drove me mad until I saw it all working. Over a period of weeks I fine tuned and played with that machine (486SX 25MHz with 8 meg of memory) until it did exactly what the client wanted.

      I had to unlearn some bad habits and had to train the staff NOT to reboot the Linux server if there was a problem. In the end that fax server worked continuously for over two years until a HD failure brought it down. I had NEVER had a Microsoft server or desktop last a week let alone a year without rebooting, including W98 and NT4.

      I also witnessed first hand how Microsoft reacted to one of their own installing Linux on what they considered their territory - you would not believe the conversations I had with my MS contacts and reps. They literally wanted me to rip out the Linux fax server and try a new NT4 fax system they were working on. I refused and things started to turn decidedly chilly. My regular phone calls and faxes requesting help or information started to go unanswered. Recommendations for my services started to go to others in my region - Microsoft was starting to freeze me out.

      By 2000 I had phased out all new installations of Microsoft products. When I was asked what the problem was by a field rep I explained

    10. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Wicko · · Score: 1

      That was refering to my reason for liking XP, I don't plan on gaming on a laptop lol. But I might do coding on it, and I find it easier for myself to do it using Visual Studio. Also, I am just plain used to XP and I like it. Call it personal preference. I know my way around it. But I never said I was willing to ditch what comes with the laptop. I'm certainly open to alternatives. But for people who aren't, I'm letting them know they can still use XP.

      But, in essence I am still correct, whether it comes from my tuition or not, I personally have only contributed 7 dollars, my tuition goes to the university and the department budget. The department can then decide what to do with THEIR money, because its no longer mine. Otherwise we could just go into a big discussion about how everyone has technically aided MS in one way or another, because money was passed down a chain of people.

      About the agreement, well I doubt thats the case but I can't claim its not. I will have to look sometime. Will they know if I'm not a student anymore? probably not.

    11. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Undead+Ed · · Score: 1

      I am posting now from a Tecra 8200 (1gig CPU 256meg memory) running Slackware 12 (full install). Slackware found and installed drivers for everything including the wireless except the winmodem. I understand there is a Linux driver for the winmodem but I am not going to bother.

      I can easily cut the install down to about 500 megs including OpenOffice that will have everthing I want and room to grow.

      I can tell you I have no probs playing most AVIs and Flash movies (YouTube and CNN) and can even play most streaming MOVs and Microsoft streaming video using GZine.

      I could probably speed some things up by using a more efficient desktop like XFCe but frankly I am too lazy.

      There are lots of cut down versions of Slackware already optimized for the less MHz enabled but I am pleased the Asus EeePC 701 does include 512meg of memory - that should me more than enough for the foreseeable LINUX future.

      I disagree that installing XP will actually be a plausable solution with an 8gig Flash drive - it would be filled in a matter of weeks with typical useage. And in the end, what would be gained? It won't be long before Microsoft suspends sales of XP in order to move all the sheep to Vista. Microsoft has also made it clear that there is a limit to the number of different platforms that existing XP can be installed on.

      I am going to buy a couple just to see what they got and what I can do with them. It will take exactly 30 minutes to install Slackware 12 from a 1gig USB memory stick.

      Thanks for your reply.

      Undead Ed

    12. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      They also cause many headaches, but for the COMMON user, they actually let them do REAL work. Linux not so much.

      Define REAL work. If you mean e-mail, web browsing, word processing, and doing spreadsheets, no problem. The Eee comes with Open Office, which can read and write Microsoft Word, Excel, and Power Point documents. Firefox is one of the best web browsers around, and Thunderbird and Evolution are a damn good e-mail applications. That takes care of 90% of the "real work" for 90% of people. All this for $199 -- software and batteries included.

      I don't know if Asus has any marketing ability, so the Eee may or may not succeed. But it or something like it will be a killer product.

    13. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Wicko · · Score: 1

      I have no doubt that server related systems should be running anything but windows, haha, but if I can manage I will have as little to do with servers as I can. Not my cup of tea I guess.

      That is a pretty scary story though, and I really wish MS isn't the way it is today. But I also can't give up windows when I've found it so useful for me. If gaming was more prominent on alternate OS's believe me, I would be using them almost immediately, but if there is one good thing MS has done, it's involved gaming. Closing us in on their platform was an obvious downfall, but they do work closely with developers and improve gaming on windows.

      I have thought about using Wine and other software but of course you lose compatibility and performance.

      But no worries, I haven't given up Linux, in fact I was planning on installing it with my new PC that I'm building (just reached my house this morning!), reason being because I have an nVidia video card, and nVidia seems to have better driver developers for Linux based platforms. ATI, well, I have an X800XT, and I couldn't install drivers for the life of me.. tried it in Ubuntu discs that I actually ordered (free of charge, of course), but I couldn't even find a link to bring up the console! Something messed up was happening there.. hopefully I will have less issues with this new system.

      "Thanks for replying in so gracious a manner."

      I do my best :)

    14. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Undead+Ed · · Score: 1

      As enjoyable as it has been, this will be my last post on this thread.

      "I will have as little to do with servers as I can. Not my cup of tea I guess."

      Understood.

      "I really wish MS isn't the way it is today"

      Actually, Microsoft is a lot less obnoxious than they were 10 years ago. Microsoft is still the pariah of IT but now they have to be much more careful because so many people and organizations are watching them like hawks.

      "if there is one good thing MS has done, it's involved gaming."

      Well just keep in mind that Microsoft is in competition with itself in the gaming business. The day may come when MS may decide it doesn't want people playing games on its OS but rather on it's game platform.

      "I have thought about using Wine and other software but of course you lose compatibility and performance."

      There is a marginal performace loss using Wine but there is an added benefit of stability.

      And you are correct, nVidia creates excellent drivers for their video cards, but then they sell 1000s of really expensive video cards ($2500+) for Linux graphics workstations (where two are required) which are the heart of the video editing and CGI industry.

      FYI my favorite distro is still Slackware after all these years. Download an ISO and try it if you are curious about Old School Linux with leading edge technology.

      Take care and lots of luck with your future - IT has been very good to me over the last 20 years, and fun as well.

      Undead Ed

    15. Re:What a perfect opportunity... by Wicko · · Score: 1

      I will have to look into Slackware, I am always open to checking out new operating systems, and I've got plenty of harddrive space to test them on. Good talking with you, take care :)

  51. ClamAV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be deceived. The program at foreground is ClamTK, a GUI frontend for ClamAV, a Linux-based scanner for Windoze viruses!

  52. 15 secs to boot Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing interesting is (from Wikipedia) the boot time:

    On top of the base Linux system, which is said to require only fifteen seconds to boot

    Anyone has additional info on how this can be done?

    1. Re:15 secs to boot Linux by jridley · · Score: 1

      Fast booting is just a matter of spending time tweaking things. Heck, I've seen BSD systems that boot in about 5 seconds. Linux boots a hell of a lot faster if you compile a custom kernel that excludes support for hardware you don't have, and you can set up config files to just tell the driver where/what stuff is instead of having it probe for it.

  53. A bit off-topic, but... by Jorophose · · Score: 0

    A couple things that sprung to my mind:

    - How could you get another OS on it? Could you just boot from USB?... Will they set up the BIOS to allow it?...
    - Can you set hard drives as read-only, or possibly stop log files of all sorts from being produced?...
    - What about putting /home on a USB drive? Good idea, awful idea? IMHO, the only problem would be if someone comes and yanks it out... But some, like the one by PQI on Newegg, are extremely small.

    I'd definately buy one. Looks freaking awesome.

    1. Re:A bit off-topic, but... by jridley · · Score: 1

      No need to even use a USB drive. It has a card reader; wedge an 8GB SD card in there and it's not even sticking out the side (at least, not much). I bought an 8G SD for about $55 and that was several months ago. Hopefully the reader supports SDHC.

    2. Re:A bit off-topic, but... by Jorophose · · Score: 0

      I didn't notice that. Changes a lot, then. SD cards are extremely innexpensive.

      http://www.shoprbc.com/ca/shop/categoryProducts.ph p?category=434

      1GiB card, 14$. But a 2GiB is something like 30$-40$. Futureshop/BestBuy, as horrible as they are, had a pack of 2 2GiB SD cards + 1 4GiB one for like 79$ once... But 2GiB is good enough, I'm still doing fine with that much assigned to my PC's /home.

    3. Re:A bit off-topic, but... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      How could you get another OS on it? Apparently it can boot from ISO images copied to a flash drive. Just download them straight to a USB flash drive and reboot. Now you don't even need to burn a CD.

      What about putting /home on a USB drive? Good idea, awful idea? It could work. It would stick out less if you put it on a flash card of some kind in the card reader. If several people use it, you might consider putting each of their home directories each on a separate card, so they get 4GB each, rather than all sharing the space.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  54. Re:does i run windows? by orasio · · Score: 1

    The memory/drive/screen size may be too limiting for windows.


    But I've never had a driver problem installing windows. The last time I did a windows install was w2k, but I had no problems installing it on my custom built computer or a compaq. The same computer, with the same hardware, Red Hat 4 wouldn't install, and after installing red hat 5, I had to recompile with mouse support. Metro X had some display problems and I needed to get an updated driver for xfree86 to support my card (Matrox Millenium II). BeOS didn't need any extra drivers (I intentionally purchased equipment they supported).


    Find the correct drivers = insert the windows CD.

    Mini poll: Is that true?

    Not for me. WinXP in a recent laptop is not like that.
    With older desktops, it wasn't either.
    Win98 was never like that for me.

    Ubuntu was, in both my pavillion laptop, and 3 self built machines.

    Anyone else with experiences?
  55. Re:does i run windows? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    Anyway, the computar bears the unholy Windows stain, between Fn and Alt...

  56. Lifebook! by Chordonblue · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's funny, I was just thinking how much this thing's specs reminded me of my two year old Fujitsu Lifebook. Same screen size, processor, chipset, wireless, etc. Except when I bought it, it was over $1700!

    That 900 MHz Pentium M is a goer compared to most VIA's and Geodes. I think this could be a terrific tool for a student.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Lifebook! by melonman · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of the Dell laptop I'm typing this on, that I got for 300 euros from a reseller on eBay. It's about the same weight, has a larger screen and keyboard, the same speed processor, more RAM, a hard disc and, when you plug it into the docking station (included) it also has a floppy drive and a combo CDR/DVD drive. With the largest of the three included batteries it has over three hours' autonomy. Ok, there's no wifi, but next years' recycled corporate laptops will have wifi too.

      If you want a cheap laptop, you can do a lot worse than recon'd s/h hardware.

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
  57. Re:does i run windows? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    They will need to fix that pretty quick, as it is a trademark infringement, a certain portly little penguin would be a suitable replacement.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  58. Re:does i run windows? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Though installing RedHat 5 (I didn't use Linux when 4 came out) could be quite a pain. I always found Win98 (similar vintage) a bigger pain. Of course Win2k is probably great on a computer that old since it will have all the drivers.

    I find the great irony of Windows that to get an easy install you need hardware that is old, but then it won't run well.

    BeOS was real easy to install, and graphics drivers were easy to install to.

    Unzip file, drag driver into symbolic link, reboot. Too bad there wern't too many cards supported.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  59. I already got one for $100 ... sortof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Compaq Armada M300. I got it used for $100 more than a year ago. No optical drive built-in, but it came with a docking station that does have one. 20Gb of storage, fair keyboard, PIII 500Mhz. Quiet, light, runs Win2k and Linux just fine (haven't tried XP on it), and adequately fast for many ordinary tasks. The only awkward part has been the 802.11g PCMCIA card sticking out, and finding a replacement battery (the ones that came with it were dead), but for the price it was a great deal even with those two extras.

    This new machine looks like it will give my old one a run for its money.

  60. Re:does i run windows? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 5, Funny

    Having a Penguin key (Penguin key sounds cooled than Tux key) would be sooooo cool. Imagine, ur mate is having a go, and needs to open the launch menu, and you say: "Just press the Penguin key man!" or he's sat there n he goes, where the windows key, and you say: "Windows key? Dude, this has a PENGUIN key." he would be like "WWWWWOOOOOOAH!!" like some crazy drug trip.

  61. Damn that's one ugly laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm with you on the N800 over this. Or many other things. Wow, that's some amazingly bad industrial design. I'm mean really, why bother if you get something that ugly. Look at the bottom and side shots.

    It's a good price point though. And there's not that much out there in that range. So I think it will find an audience none the less. Hopefully there will be others in the sub $300 portable/laptop/tablet/webpad/etc. market that will make that field more interesting.

  62. Re:Why? by ScolopendraGigantea · · Score: 1

    I don't think it will take off like other systems. But honestly I might get one for my fiance so she can use it...

    Judging by the previous commentary on this thread, you may be wrong in the first sentence and it may be because of the idea in your second. A lot of people are looking at this machine thinking "You know, for this price, it might be useful for $(TASK)..." And so you end up with your fiancee--who from context isn't a hardcore geek, sorry if I'm wrong--some grandkids, some parents, all using this thing.

    Everyone out there has at least one 'little thing' that their computer is for. Writing their novel. Checking their email. Carrying around videos. If everyone--including 'normal people'--sees this machine as a cheap opportunity to have a tiny little portable computer to do their one thing easily, it will take off.

  63. Re:does i run windows? by mrbooze · · Score: 1

    It depends on the hardware, and really there tends to be little windows of time where some hardware is so new compared to how old the Windows CDs are that you might have to look for drivers elsewhere. It's not something I've ever had to do commonly supporting a lot of R&D labs, but there were times through the years where, for example, the Dell servers we were getting came with RAID controllers that the Windows of the time didn't understand, requiring the old "Hit F-whatever to insert an alternate driver disk" during install thing. It's been much less common in recent years though because in situations like that you typically get a set of install discs from Dell that handles that for you.

    The only other exception I've ever had was Compaq desktops. We only bought a few of those but all of them were very specific about what version of Windows they supported and getting something like NT 4.0 working on the Compaq box that came with Windows 95 was far more of a pain than it should ever be.

    For the most part though in the last few years, buying machines from relatively well-known and reputable vendors I have not had to deal hunting up 3rd party drivers during Windows installs.

    But at the same time, in those same recent years, my only real problem with various linux installs has been the wireless drivers, largely just because of stupid legal issues with distributing some drivers for which there were no open source versions at the time.

  64. Matias Half Keyboard has got to suck life. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Citation needed that a one-handed keyboard causes extreme frustration.

    How about no one ever uses one? If they did you would have sales figures.

    Now how about personal experience. I do the same thing with a normal keyboard from time to time. It's not easy and I think I'd shit if I had to hold a key down while reversing my hand's muscle memory like that.

    There have been several small laptops with small keyboards. Only a few have been usable. Having a bezel around a screen makes sense and is an easy way to mate a large keyboard with a small screen.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Matias Half Keyboard has got to suck life. by TimboJones · · Score: 1

      I haven't used one myself, but down near the bottom of that page they show that the keys themselves are reversed. You don't have to reverse your fingers, pinkie index, like you do by shifting your hand on a standard keyboard; your index types J, middle K, ring L. I can believe that the brain easily mirrors finger movements in this way.

      Space bar as a held-down modifier key gives me pause, and I don't think I'd want to code or do administrative work on this. But I can see value in it for a lot of people. Consider running 10-key and a full keyboard without shifting your hand. I can see some fun possibilities for gaming...

  65. Here's a tip by joeszilagyi · · Score: 1, Informative

    1. Go to Starbucks.
    2. Wait for yuppie on laptop to go to the bathroom.
    3. Take laptop.
    4. Wipe out Windows with nix install of your choice.
    5. Profit!

    --
    Dude, where's my packet?
    1. Re:Here's a tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. You'll end up with Apple hardware.

    2. Re:Here's a tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a bad thing? I thought Apple made nice hardware, so...

      1. Go to Starbucks.
      2. Wait for yuppie on laptop to go to the bathroom.
      3. Take laptop.
      4. Wipe out OS X with nix install of your choice.
      5. Profit!

  66. It fills an interesting niche... by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have much storage, but it would be useful in a home or office surrounding where you could connect to a wireless NFS server containing your homedir and apps.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  67. my kids will love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to get one of these for my kids. Small keyboard might be a bonus for them. They're still young, so most of the computer games they play are flash based things (e.g. cyberchase site on pbs). It's cheap, so I don't have to hover to make sure they don't trash my $4K laptop. It's light, so they can run around the house with it.

    Still, is it sturdy enough for kids? I hope some reviewer somewhere drops one of these a few times and reports the results.

    I also want one for work so I can catch up with my email during all the insufferable meetings. My "real" notebook is not quite so portable that I just pick it up and take it anywhere I'm going.

  68. What about the sound chip? by Rah'Dick · · Score: 1

    We all take a sound system for granted, but I don't see it anywhere, which makes me wonder: will it have sound? According to Wikipedia, it has a built-in camera, but there are no speakers visible anywhere. I wouldn't mind if it has a headphone jack only, but... No sound at all is a showstopper for me, no matter how awesome the rest of the device may be.

    1. Re:What about the sound chip? by Rah'Dick · · Score: 1

      Forget what I just said. I had a closer look on the photos from TFA and saw it has a headphone and mic jack. Still, there is no mention of the sound chip used in the device - I suppose it'll be AC'97.

    2. Re:What about the sound chip? by Wicko · · Score: 1

      I wish they would have ditched a camera altogether, probably would have cut the cost even more, maybe add an extra 4GB in there!

  69. I'll second that - no need for optical drive. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Screw the optical drive. The Armada M300 I've already mentioned somewhere above doesn't have one.

    Agreed, my X30 does not have an optical drive and I've never missed the extra pound and power drain. Everywhere I go, I'm surrounded by big, honking desktops that invariably have an optical drive. At least one is an X forward away but I've needed them once or twice in a year's time. At home, I have a firewire DVD burner, which does the trick. The only other time I've wanted an optical drive was to install my OS, but GNU linux is flexible enough that that's not a problem.

    This thing's 2.2 lbs and processor specs makes my X30 look old, hot and heavy. In a year or two, cheap laptops like this are going to be everywhere and I might just buy one.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  70. Two things. by mypalmike · · Score: 1

    1. Please provide a link to a $370 dual-core Intel laptop with Vista. I'll be waiting.
    2. The small size and weight (2 pounds) make it portable. The hypothetical 5.5 pound machine is a pain to lug around.

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  71. The only downside by Bullfish · · Score: 1

    I can see to this thing is that it will sell like hotcakes and spur copycats, which all really will be disposable items. If they bust in service, most will be landfilled as not worth fixing and most of the guts are toxic.

    1. Re:The only downside by Rah'Dick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could imagine that a lot of people would pry the things open and fix/hack the hell out of it... People are even repairing laptop battery cells, so why not repair the notebook itself? For that price, you can as well have a go at it before throwing it away.

  72. I have a £40 (US$80) Linux laptop... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    A blistering PII 266 with 32Mb of SDRAM! Reduce, Re-use, Recycle!

    1. Re:I have a £40 (US$80) Linux laptop... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I traded a buddy of mine some 45RPM vinyl records I got as part of a set (along with some old collectible books and some brass, walnut and marble shelve knick-knacks or my home office) for $1 at an auction. He didn't take all the records, mind you, just twelve or so he really liked. I got a SmallLinux laptop out of the deal. I'm thinking about putting DOS back on it, though, to play some of my old games on real DOS instead of DOSBox.

  73. 10" screen still too small. by tji · · Score: 1

    Years ago, I bought a very expensive Sony sub-notebook (PCG-SR7K, I think). It was great for portability.. very light and small.
    But, it had two big problems: The 10" screen was way too small for everyday use, and the keyboard was too small for decent typing.

    I like the concept of this Asus.. small, light, flash storage, Linux OS. Great for many users primarily interested in web access. But, the 10" screen is too limiting.

    For the $100 increase in price from 7" to 10", they could surely afford a better LCD panel. A 17" LCD is on sale at Best Buy this week for $129 retail (i.e. including the retailer markup, packaging, standalone monitor components and power supply, etc..). They could have easily done a display large enough to fill the top of the laptop that $100 markup. If they had done that, it would have been very powerful/usable.

    As it is now, with a 10" display, it seems like a toy imitation of a real laptop.

  74. What interface on the flash? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    I want a computer like this with maybe a bit more internal flash memory (maybe 32 gigs would be enough, but I've lived with 15 gigs) so I can put movies on the thing before a trip.

    And...

    I want that internal memory to be accessable as Flash memory, to Linux, instead of pretending it's a spinning drive. I want to run JFFS2 on it.

    It'd also be nice if it had more battery life. Here, what would be really nice is a quick, supported suspend-to-RAM (or suspend-to-disk), enough internal battery to run it suspended for maybe five minutes, and a cheap removable battery -- especially if said battery could be plugged in directly to charge, rather than having to be in a laptop. That would make this awesome for long trips, plane flights, etc -- it could light some "low battery" light and auto-suspend itself, and refuse to come back on until you swap batteries.

    And being able to charge the battery separately is just convenience -- you could stay on the couch, just get up every 3 hours or so to swap out batteries, instead of being tethered to a power cable.

    Interestingly, this sounds very close to my old Sharp laptop -- which cost me $1700 or so. It had some 256 megs of RAM (or was it 128?), a 1 ghz Crusoe that felt like 500 mhz, a 15 gig internal hard drive, and a 10" screen. Weighed about 2 pounds.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  75. Still at $199 by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    This is what the Palm Folio should have been.

    Palm are you listening?

  76. SSH, too. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The bulk of my work that isn't fixing stuff is done with vim over SSH and a web browser. Firefox is getting a bit heavy, but it only has the one or two tabs I need for the app I'm developing -- Konqueror can handle the rest.

    There are other nice things you could do, if you bother to set it up. For instance, instead of carrying a half-dozen boot CDs or DVDs, you could bring this and a crossover cable, and use that to "jump start" someone's computer. Might even prove a good analogy, when someone asks what you're doing.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:SSH, too. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I also carry a crossover cable for the same reason. Used to carry a PCanywere cable to use with Ghost, but now that drives are so big, thats no longer a good option.

      However, 99.9% of what i do is for businesses, so i can just tap into the hub/switch in the back room. And i have an external HD to store images/backups/tools/etc ( so i can borrow a pc at their office if available ) but the laptop I have is still a bit big to lug around.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  77. Re:does i run windows? by greenbird · · Score: 1

    It depends on the hardware, and really there tends to be little windows of time where some hardware is so new compared to how old the Windows CDs are that you might have to look for drivers elsewhere.

    Yeah, maybe little things like installing on SATA drives. They've been around how long? You know like a little 5 year window. Just pop in the Windows CD and spend the next 4 hours trying to get it to recognize your hard drive.

    --
    Who is John Galt?
  78. Re:does i run windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    REally so windows now comes with the latest Nividia and Creative drivers out of the box? also Scsi cards and SATA is supported by default?

    Wow! that damned out of date XP SP2 install CD's I have.. I knew that using such an aincent OS would bite me.

  79. Re:does i run windows? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Since Compaq did not support Win2K on that particular model, I had to hunt down which obfuscated drivers fit those particular chips on other Compaq models... install those... and hope they worked. Or find OEM versions. Eventually I got everything running (more or less).

    Why do so many people still not get it after 8 years? As of Windows 2000, YOU CAN USE DRIVERS FOR OLDER VERSIONS OF WINDOWS. That's right, for most everything, the Windows 98 drivers will work for 2K and XP just fine... Just ignore the warnings/prompts and try it out.

    I don't understand why nobody has gotten the hint yet. Has nobody noticed it automatically selecting to use the (signed) Win98 drivers before the (unsigned) 2K drivers? Did you really think Windows is so stupid it selects drivers it can't use over the ones it can?
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  80. Not super cheap, but... by leamanc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I'm quite happy with my Dell Inspiron E1505 "n series."

    For $650, I got Ubuntu (although I quickly converted it to my preferred KDE-based Kubuntu), 1 gig-o-ram, a 1.73 Core Duo (low-power Centrino version), an 80 gig hard drive, WiFi, firewire, 4 USB ports, a 15.4" glossy widescreen, 802.11 g/n WiFi, darn good battery life, and a CD-RW/DVD-ROM combo drive.

    Granted, this is not US$199, but I think it's a pretty good deal for what you get. I'm generally a Mac buyer, but I feel like I got something similar to a $1,199 MacBook. Even though I think the MacBook is still a nicer machine--with better industrial design and OS X/iLife--but for $550 less, I've got a not-bad-looking laptop, a great/stable/secure OS, and tons of free apps that rival iLife (i.e., Picasa in place of iPhoto, Amarok instead of iTunes).

    My only complaint is that I had to install the 915resolution package to get beyond 1024x768 (which looks horrible on a widescreen, as you might imagine). Why couldn't Dell pre-install this on the machines that need it (integrated graphics)?

    Browsing with Firefox, emailing with Thunderbird, and the media keys working with Amarok are some of the niceties that make me think this was the best bang-for-your-buck computer purchase I ever made.

    --
    :q!
    1. Re:Not super cheap, but... by cdw38 · · Score: 1

      That's 250% more expensive than this machine. This isn't targeted at seasoned computer users - it's targeted at people that honestly could not afford your $650 Dell laptop (and, believe it or now, many of them exist in the U.S.). Even in more developed countries/areas, with city-wide WiFi becoming more and more popular, lower-income folks could jump all over this. Even without city-wide WiFi there is practically a Starbucks on every street corner and (sadly) plenty of private-yet-unprotected wireless connections these people will gladly leech off of (unknowingly) in any major city. All you need is a place to plug it in and you've got your own computer for $199.

    2. Re:Not super cheap, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nofi, but your Dell is huge (15,4", come on, I don't want to take that on the road with me!) heavy (3kg+, not very portable either) and I bet you don't get over 2hrs batterylife from it, unless you buy extra batteries.

      Point is, for browsing, email and note taking, this is exactly what you need. Cause of the Core 800mhz and VGA out you can even use it to watch movies and give presentations).

      I got a desktop for the heavy lifting, this would be perfect for on the road.

  81. Re:An NT$10 coin ~= US$1 coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Parent wrote:

    Diameter: 30.61 mm (1.205 in) Half dollar (United States coin)

    Diameter: 24.26 mm (0.955 in) Quarter (United States coin)

    Diameter: 26 mm New Taiwan dollar NT$10 Coin

    Uhh. Why not say it's almost the exact same size as the United States Dollar coin, which is listed as having Diameter 26.5 mm (1.043 in). The NT$10 coin is MUCH closer to the US$1 coin than it is to either the US$0.25 or the US$0.50 coin.

  82. Re:does i run windows? by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's tough to tell if you post is just profane ignorance or flamebait, but are you fucking stupid? NT based operating systems have this little thing goin on called Microkernel Architecture. No way a win98 or older driver will work as well, if at all on one of these newer OSes.

    to recap:
    NT 4.0 driver on 2k or xp - maybe
    98se driver on NT 4 2k, or xp - NO FUCKING WAY

  83. Re:does i run windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you really think Windows is so stupid it selects drivers it can't use over the ones it can?

    Frankly, yes. Over the years, I've seen Windows do so many bloody stupid things, I'm more surprised when it gets something right.

  84. Which dollar coin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which Dollar coin?
    The Susan B = which was the size of a quarter (morons)
    The Suck-on-my-nut-sack dollar (which we try to ignore, and don't know it's size)
    or
    The new Presidents quarter (which is yet another example that the US Treasury is turning into the Franklin Mint)

    1. Re:Which dollar coin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which Dollar coin?
      All of them.

      The Susan B is 26.5mm.
      The Sacagawea is 26.5mm.

      According to the US Mint, both the "Presidential $1" and the "Golden Dollar" have the same physical properties; they're 26.5mm.
  85. I want one... maybe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find myself moderately interested in getting one of these, as it seems to be everything I really need in a laptop (ie, runs Unix of some description, is small enough to be conveniently portable). I am wondering a few things though; like is it possible to leave a flash card plugged in there without having a bit of it sticking out? How much would an extra battery cost? What resolution is the screen?

  86. Silly Users by RegTooLate · · Score: 1

    Or take my approach, tell them the computer is hosed but you'll be glad to take it off their hands because they are going to buy that shiny Mac. Format and install Ubuntu, good to go. How much did that cost? Nuthin.

  87. Exactly by 2short · · Score: 1

    Just give it some more screen real estate and it will be perfect for me. The only thing I use a laptop for is as a remote front end for more powerful machines somewhere else.

    Given the price and size/weight, I think I'll have to at least see the 10" model, but I don't think that I can handle it; I'm too spoiled by nice big screens.

  88. Keyboard??? by dohcrx · · Score: 1

    anyone else notice how in the picture the guy has three fingers: his left ring, middle and index on the keyboard and his thumb on the touchpad...

    sure it doesn't looked cramped if you only type with 8 fingers! i tend to also use my pinkie fingers to type...

    HUGE keyboard

  89. You fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15.4 inches? That makes the bloody thing HUGE. Hard drive? Prone to crashing. 399, is not even close to 199. Not even close to 299.

    So basically you found a laptop that is bigger, more expensive, makes more noise and isn't as robuust for twice the price and you consider that an alternative?

    You sir are made of fail and loose, you do NOT get an internet.

  90. Wow by Brianwa · · Score: 1

    Aside from the storage space, that thing is almost on par with my somewhat aged desktop computer. Hell, the FSB speed of the Pentium M is about double that of my AMD Duron. That's a pretty capable laptop for $200; if it actually ends up selling for that price I will certainly consider buying one.

  91. I'm getting one. by pseudosero · · Score: 1

    The machine of the future, for less than the machine of the past.

    --
    sometimes, nothing.
  92. Re:does i run windows? by mrbooze · · Score: 1

    I just did that a few months ago. Sata drives in a mirrored raid configuration, and Windows XP instal CD recognized everything just fine.

  93. Just buy a s/h ThinkPad by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    That's right. If you want a cheap laptop just buy a second-hand IBM ThinkPad. Linux runs on them as if they are designed for the task. I wore out a R40 and now have a T41.

    1. Re:Just buy a s/h ThinkPad by Budenny · · Score: 1

      Similar story, very good advice. Debian on the PIII 12 inch X series runs fast, the battery life is reasonable, the build quality is superb, and they are totally portable. Problems with the modem. But wireless works perfectly out of the box.

    2. Re:Just buy a s/h ThinkPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad almost all of them have these huge screens but still only a sucky 1024*768 resolution.

    3. Re:Just buy a s/h ThinkPad by Wicko · · Score: 1

      Many people would rather purchase a brand new machine than buy a second hand one from someone they don't know. Brand new, unused, and warranty seems like the better option. Besides, this is actually pretty damn cheap, at least considering ebay auctions for thinkpads.

  94. Re:does i run windows? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    No way a win98 or older driver will work as well, if at all on one of these newer OSes.

    So you clearly haven't ever tried it, and based on your buzzword knowledge of NT you're sure it can't? And I'm the one that's ignorant?
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  95. Re:does i run windows? by edwdig · · Score: 1

    Windows 98 introduced WDM - Windows Driver Model. It's a stable driver model used by Win98 and up. I'm not sure on Vista though - I seem to recall that they dropped support, but I'm not sure. They may still have support, but don't allow things like secure audio paths if you use any WDM drivers.

    Anyway, here's some details on it straight from MS: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/archive/wdmoverview. mspx

  96. kids by misanthrope101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have 13 and 15 year old kids, both of whom want laptops. They aren't getting a $1200 Macbook. They aren't even getting a $600 laptop. It'll get left at a friend's house, on the bus, or dropped. It may not, but it may. At $200 or so, it wouldn't kill me if they lost it, though I'd be irritated. At $600 or even $400, it would piss me off and they wouldn't get another one. Price points do matter.

  97. Linux Laptop Vendors by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just recently started a page linking to linux laptop vendors. Check it out, and if you have anything to contribute, feel free to reply to this post.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  98. If this is a Linux laptop ... by AxminsterLeuven · · Score: 1

    ... why does it come with a Windows-key on the keyboard?
    Take a look for yourself.
    Couldn't they have put a little penguin on it instead?

    1. Re:If this is a Linux laptop ... by Wicko · · Score: 1

      Whatever flavour they are running, probably has an interface very similar to windows to help the new users bridge the gap. In fact I'm 99% sure I read that in an article about the Eee, they tried to make it Windows-User friendly. Although I don't know many average users who actually use shortcut keys.

  99. Re:does i run windows? by symbolic · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's certainly not any worse than long-time Apple users called the "open-apple" key. Well, at least some did.

  100. Re:does i run windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy one of these cooool keyboards, it's called CyMotion Master Linux G86-21070 and appears to be available only with german layout, e.g. here, but you'll probably appreciate the additional key.

  101. Re:$899 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the problem is how to light the cock.

  102. The ideal conference laptop by srmq · · Score: 1

    The small form factor, light weight, lack of moving parts, integrated OpenOffice, and VGA output make it the ideal conference laptop! Very nice for researchers on the move!

  103. Patents by tepples · · Score: 1

    How about no one ever uses one? If they did you would have sales figures. The only reason that I can see why a one-handed keyboard hasn't caught on is that Matias holds a patent on this invention, due to run out in a few years. Therefore, it can't be implemented in cheap $10 keyboards made in China.
  104. Excellent musicians tool by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

    Hook this up with a USB MIDI (or high quality USB MIDI/Audio) interface and you've got a truly excellent portable music tool. No moving parts, the ability to play MIDI files or mp3/WAV/flac backing tracks and most importantly something that you can add any Linux compatible music program that appears now or in the future (storage space/disk access requirements permitting).

    No more struggling with tiny LCD screens and an "incomprehensible to all but the people who designed it" menu systems !

    With a decent external mic and some extra plug in storage you've also got the making of a fantastic field recorder/editor.

    Puts my home brew effort to shame which is an old M-ATX mobo in custom 19" rack case (really crap, home made!) running damn small linux, booting from 4Gb compact flash, using old 15" monitor :)

    N.B. UK retailers. If you think you're doing your usual trick by translating $ 199 to £ 199 you can forget it. I'll get someone to bring me one back in their luggage.

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    1. Re:Excellent musicians tool by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Speaking of homebrew, I was actually thinking of putting a home-brew laptop together. Via EPIA, LCD panel, CompactFlash PATA adapter, compact keyboard, model car or cordless power tool battery, etc. That still works out to be more fun, but this Asus machine works out to be cheaper, sleeker, and probably lighter.

    2. Re:Excellent musicians tool by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      With a decent external mic and some extra plug in storage you've also got the making of a fantastic field recorder/editor.

      The internal sound cards in laptops are usually terrible, and this one cannot be much better than the average. With the one in my Amilo Pro V2020, I can hear hard drive activity quite clearly, and there's a significant bass attenuation that was probably made purposefully to mitigate this problem. I use a proper USB sound card, which in addition to better sound quality gives MIDI interfaces and a very minimal mixer for extra sound sources.

      Then again, I need to use a laptop as a full music workstation, so this cheap one wouldn't work anyway. For starters, a "decent mic" usually means XLR with phantom power. On the other hand I'd love to have a small and cheap laptop for many other applications, but it's hard to really justify owning so many computers, especially with a student budget where $200 worth of food and drink go a long way.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  105. Yes, but does it run... by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    ...Ubuntu? If so, I would like one. Also, what's the screen resolution, does anyone know?

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Yes, but does it run... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Gadgettastic says 800x480.

      I'm sure you could get Ubuntu installed.

    2. Re:Yes, but does it run... by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Please explain this....

      One of the prime attratctions of Ubuntu is that it is easy to install and does a pretty good job setting itself up to the hardware that you have.

      Well, guess what. The distro this thing uses is already installed and works with the hardware. Once it is installed, does it really matter? If you want to talk Gnome vs. KDE, I will listen. Same for vi vs. emacs vs. kate (my fave).

      I would imagine that they spent a lot of time optimizing what is installed. 4GB of drive space just isn't much to throw in the kitchen sink. Even Ubuntu will have a lot of junk that you will never use and don't need.

      I would probably be happy with a vanilla machine. Bonus points for being able to install a Z-Machine interpreter on there.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:Yes, but does it run... by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I totally agree... But, apt-get...

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  106. I want an OLPC laptop by DrXym · · Score: 1
    The dimensions and form factor are perfect for casual computing on the go. On top of that the thing is rugged, sips power and can be shoved into any bag. It's perfect for coffeeshops, trains, weekend breaks etc. If it breaks or gets stolen, well that sucks but nowhere as near as much as if it happened to a Sony Vaio.

    I reckon if Quanta or OLPC produce a commercial version with similar specs running Linux (e.g. with OpenOffice, Firefox etc.) that they'll make a killing. I know I'll be first in line for one.

    The ASUS Eee PC looks cool too but I still prefer the OLPC and would be delighted if some of the money I spent on a commercial model went back into funding the project.

  107. My random thoughts by ArcadeX · · Score: 1

    I didn't RTFA, but is there an option to make the onboard flash read only? Would love one for my mom, put M$ 2000 on it so she can run her school software, and use the SD memory for swap, temp profile settings, etc. Would be great, and every time she reboots no viruses, malware, or other crap, she never installs anything anyway. As far as an M$ killer goes, I didn't see any comments mentioning it being carried by a major retailer with actual storefront. ASUS has always been pretty high on my list, but until it's in walmart, bestbuy, CC, officedepot, etc, it won't get that wide of coverage. Just agreeing with other comments, a larger screen would be nicer, maybe go up to to 14" and as stated in earlier posts, use the extra space for a larger keyboard, and enclosed bays to store thumb drives, larger usb devices like tv tuners, audio decoders, etc. Yes, I will either paint or buy a tux key. Every TV I buy these days as analog monitor inputs, I'm getting one the bedroom, I'd been thinking of a water cooling system for the machine in there, but this would be soo much better. Just my two coppers, now hand me my vorpal sword, i've work to do in the server room.

    --
    An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
    1. Re:My random thoughts by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Well, with Linux one could mount the internal flash as read-only and let the OS take care of it. With Windows 2k, you might not be able to do anything to stop that. Since it's designed to be for Linux, I'm not sure they'd spend the money to put a BIOS option in for something that the OS could handle.

      I'm not sure where it was called an MS killer. It's not even a Dell preloaded Linux killer. It's just another, very cheap and small option for people.

      Hell, I don't particularly want to kill MS. I'd just be happy if they stopped spreading FUD, stopped backing frivolous lawsuits against Linux-supporting companies, stopped coercing computer sellers into selling only MS operating systems, and were willing to take the share of the market they could get on product quality and honest marketing. Since they're not willing to do those things, they must realize how little of the market they'd have if they did.

  108. Re:does i run windows? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Even though I hate Windows, I hope that's not true.

    Windows 2000 was supposed to have introduced a hardware abstraction layer (like the one in Solaris, which was so good even Linux ended up copying it). I can just about see the idea of Windows 2000 drivers working on XP, but '98 drivers? Not sure about that at all. Once you start allowing things to bypass the HAL, you sacrifice any advantages it afforded you in the first place.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  109. Re:does i run windows? by orasio · · Score: 1

    It depends on the hardware, and really there tends to be little windows of time where some hardware is so new compared to how old the Windows CDs are that you might have to look for drivers elsewhere. It is common that you install a new OS on a new machine. That is the issue with windows. They don't have a release every six months, so your hardware is not going to be supported right from the installation CD. You have to add the fact that if the hardware includes windows drivers that you can use, the installation process is not the same in all cases, so it's added complexity. Of course, most of us don't take that into account, because we did that for lots of years (windows 3.0 through windows 2000, in my case) and the we don't regard that as "hard", but it has even more steps to remember and intricacies than compiling and installing a new Linux kernel, that is the most difficult thing you could ever do with regard to Linux drivers.

    With most GNU/Linux distributions, you are getting the last drivers, because you are getting a fairly new Linux, and there is where most drivers are.

    There is the issue of proprietary hardware with no specs, but for example, Ubuntu brings some current proprietary drivers, and for example my HP pavillion installations have been seamless.

  110. Re:does i run windows? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    ... I still do. It took me a lot of time to notice they no longer have "Apple" keys.

  111. Re:does i run windows? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

    As of Windows 2000, YOU CAN USE DRIVERS FOR OLDER VERSIONS OF WINDOWS.

    While that's interesting PR for MS, it's totally at odds with my experiences with win2k. I had all kinds of problems trying to get drivers for win2k, and in many cases older ones wouldn't work. Printers seemed to be especially problematic.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  112. Graphics card by Kludge · · Score: 1

    What graphics card does this thing have?
    An Intel 945-965? Then it could do 3D too. That would be great.

  113. Disposing of aTandy Model 100 by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    You don't have to give away your Tandy. Sell it on EBay or via any other method of your choosing. Fans like me who have previously on this site waxed ecstatic on the virtues of that hardware will pay good money for working examples.

    1. Re:Disposing of aTandy Model 100 by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it would be free -- I was just asking if he was interested before quoting him a price :)

      But maybe I should put it on eBay. What are they going for these days?

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    2. Re:Disposing of aTandy Model 100 by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

      This guy sells what you describe (a used, assumed shop-grade M100) for USD$75. His are fully-checked-out and he's considered reputable. I'd expect to pay less from a person I randomly run into online who says theirs works.

      I was seriously considering getting a cosmetically nice, fully rebuilt 102 from him for USD$350. However, for less money and an actual Linux OS with vi, this new Asus may be my choice by the time I actually need the new machine. Still, for a writer, the physical attributes of the Tandy are simply unbeatable. I've never typed on any portable note-taker that even came close. My dear God, I love that keyboard!

      I'd pay USD$500 if someone would start producing the 102 again with modern peripheral ports running a stripped-down Linux OS. (I say "stripped-down" since vi, network connectivity, and maybe Lynx are basically the only things I need when I'm writing on the road. Oh, yeah, and give it room for 8 AA batteries; long-lived, easily replaceable batteries are seriously useful.) Wi-fi would be an unnecessary luxury and even an ethernet port would be optional; just a couple of USB ports and I'd be happy as long as I could have that wonderful keyboard and flat-as-a-book, easy-to-tote form factor again.

      OK, I'm beginning to gush. I'll stop now.

  114. Re:does i run windows? by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 1

    About 4 years ago I tried installing windows and it didn't recognize my onboard SATA controller. I got some files off the web, put 'em on a floppy then attached a floppy drive from an old computer to my new one, copy the files over and then windows would install. It was a little stressful as I was unexperienced with performing such a procedure, but it worked first try!

    --
    try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
  115. Re:does i run windows? by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    Yes i have tried it, but clearly i haven't tried every device in existance. There may be exceptions, but I'd put a large sum of money that any device with a shred of complexity to it would not work. Can you imagine installing windows 98 catalyst drivers onto xp?

  116. Re:does i run windows? by lordtoran · · Score: 0

    What? The four wiggly squares on the Meta key are supposed to be windows? But it doesn't open any windows when I press it, and I don't run Beryl, so my windows don't wiggle anyway.

    --
    Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
  117. Looks very nice by mozai2002 · · Score: 1

    my quibbles are 1) What software can i run on it? bash? gcc? java? I'm sure if it becomes popular these will be added by community but what about from start? 2) Battery life is a bit low and doesn't seem to be easily accessible. Two battery ports with on the fly battery swapping would have been nice ;)

  118. Interesting Laptop by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    While I wouldn't bother with this if I needed a "real" laptop, I just could see using this with an external USB hard drive as a tech support tool. I don't have a laptop at the moment, and it would be nice - especially with the wireless - to be able to both lookup stuff on the Net when the client's Net access is down or just look up documentation in general stored on the laptop, and also have an external USB drive to hold utilities and back off client files.

    I use an external USB drive anyway, but having this laptop as a working computer would help.

    Of course, I could just buy an old cheap used laptop anywhere which probably would have as much power as this thing and use it the same way.

    I think the 4-8GB flash drive idea was a bad one. I really can't see that they can't reach the price point with some larger hard drives. How much more can OEM versions of 20-40GB laptop drives cost than the expensive flash drives? At least, leaving aside the probability that nobody makes those any more since everything is 60-80GB and up now. Couldn't they make a deal with a hard disk manufacturer to put in regular 20-40GB drives? 20GB anyway would probably be more than enough for anybody using these laptops. Although I suppose even 8GB would be enough for a lot of people using these. I do have clients using old HP machines with only 6-8GB drives - a lot of home users who aren't computer savvy or using media never fill those things.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  119. Turn off the backlight by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1

    Excellent idea. You might want to turn off the screen though, because the backlight has a limited lifetime. I don't know if there is an easy way to keep the backlight off while the unit is running.

  120. Pepper Pad by David+Gould · · Score: 1

    You might be interested in the Pepper Pad Linux tablet. I got my PP3 a couple months ago, for exactly the same reason: something smaller/lighter to lug around on vacation, and less at stake if it got lost/stolen/damaged. It worked out great for that trip, and I'm likely to end up carrying the laptop around less and less as I move more of my stuff over to it.

    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  121. Is this a troll? by hawk · · Score: 1

    >Same for vi vs. emacs vs. kate (my fave).

    Come, now, our you trolling? *Everyone* knows that you can't have your kate and emacs too . . .

    hawk, running for cover

  122. Windows key? by ghostbar38 · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why if is a stock linux machine it does have a Windows Logo Key... Anyway, I want one :)

    --
    ghostbar page.
  123. interesting use of kde by bensch128 · · Score: 1

    I think it is a pretty good use of kde.
    Maybe a bit too simplistic but it does make good use of kde3's icons and color palette and theme.
    I think they are trying to make it look TOO much like windows actually.

    hum, i hope it succeeds, (or at least fails for a good reason)
    ben

  124. Re:does i run windows? by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Judging from your link, WDM is a source-level model, not a binary interface model. Its existence doesn't prove or disprove anything about the GP's post.

  125. Re:does i run windows? by edwdig · · Score: 1

    Windows always maintains binary compatibility. They don't always guarantee source compatibility, as sometimes the headers change to better accommodate new features.

    Anyway, from the article I linked:

    "Binary compatibility is possible on processors that are compatible with the Intel Architecture. Achieving a single binary still requires rigorous testing on all versions of all operating systems."

  126. Re:does i run windows? by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Yes, I didn't bother to read the linked article all the way down to there... Thanks for the correction.

    Unusual that only because of this thread I have discovered the "wdmwrapper" kernel module for Linux. Are purely WDM drivers so uncommon?