Slashdot Mirror


Pay-For-Visit Advertising

theodp writes "US patent office documents released Thursday show that a startup named Pelago is seeking a patent covering Pay-For-Visit Advertising, which uses GPS, Bluetooth, or RFID on your mobile devices to track your travels to see if you wander into a place of business that appeared in an ad shown earlier on your cellphone, PDA, or laptop. To maximize ad revenue, phone calls are also tracked to see if you dial a number associated with an ad, and financial transactions are examined to see if you make a purchase from an advertiser. The application goes on to note that the system may be of interest to government agencies. Pelago just raised $7.4M from the likes of KPCB and Jeff Bezos."

176 comments

  1. no thanks by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i've got to think that this will create a market for phones that wont allow this kind of thing to happen. i'd go without a cell phone before i'd let myself be tracked like that everywhere i go.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:no thanks by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh and you shouldn't use a credit, debit card or checks for any of your transactions, forget about Buying stuff online or mail order.

      Back in them olden days when we went to the corner store Bob behind the counter knew what your spending habbits were and gave you options on what was new and good, and if Bob was a bit chatty half the town would know your spending habbits. We acuatlly have far more privacy per day. You are being tacked as a number and that number is rairly connected to you personally. So the whole town doesn't know your spending habbits just some guys from xyz knows that 9384123223 likes to buy keyboards, or is in a market for keyboards. Don't expect the governement to get it right if they cant realize when you put in a change of address for a new license and they will not send you notices that your registration is out of date to the new address I doubt they can figure anything else about you.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:no thanks by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
      i've got to think that this will create a market for phones that wont allow this kind of thing to happen.i'd go without a cell phone before i'd let myself be tracked like that everywhere i go.

      That's an issue for me also. I also don't like the idea of having ads rammed down my throat when I'm searching for something. Meaning, if I'm searching for a "Joe's Coffee", I don't want Starbucks shoved onto my screen.

      FTFP: The advertisement system may provide to the mobile device of the user a search result that includes an advertisement for a coffee shop.

      I am also concerned that someone will figure out how to get your phone to ring with an advertisement when you're near a client. That will really piss me off! I don't want to interrupted with ads!

      --
      I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    3. Re:no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh and you shouldn't use a credit, debit card or checks for any of your transactions, forget about Buying stuff online or mail order. And don't forget to post anonymously on slashdot!
    4. Re:no thanks by Threni · · Score: 1

      > We acuatlly have far more privacy per day.

      No, because now we have Bob in addition to all this spook bullshit.

      In the UK there are laws against `interception of communications` so it'll be interesting to see if anything turns up on my mobile phone contract giving permission to them to tell any number of shops where I am and who I'm phoning. I'd imagine that any network which doesn't go along with this might pick up a few customers.

    5. Re:no thanks by Lockejaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are being tacked as a number and that number is rairly connected to you personally.
      Nope, just to my shipping info... but that includes my name. Then that info is available to anyone willing to pay for it. And then the credit card company sees where all my payments go and can sell that data.
      Seriously, if you want anonymity, buy stuff at a brick-and-mortar store, and pay cash. The whole town doesn't know your spending habits. There's just some guy at xyz who knows that tall skinny guy with graying hair bought a lot of cereal half an hour ago. Of course, the chance that he cares enough to remember the purchase half an hour later is slim.
      --
      (IANAL)
    6. Re:no thanks by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Seriously, if you want anonymity, buy stuff at a brick-and-mortar store, and pay cash. "

      I dunno.

      Can't you get one use credit cards to use? Hard to trace. Set yourself up a PO box, at a place that you can send things to....where they use 'Suite' No. instead of box number, so that it looks like a street address and companies will deliver there.

      Those things don't make you impossible to trace, but, should make it a bit more difficult...at least for the way they collect mass data these days.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:no thanks by somersault · · Score: 1

      lmao.. it's also ironic that if you click on his home page, he lists where he and his family were going to be in July..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:no thanks by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      Given the recent announcement of the google ad-based cell phone, I think I know where this could get a foothold. So, for now it will be opt-in (for those who didn't want to pay for cell service), until it catches on and spy-free phones are the minority.

    9. Re:no thanks by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, if you want anonymity, buy stuff at a brick-and-mortar store, and pay cash.

      I think the point of concern with some is that even this will stop working if you carry a cell phone with you. They watch you coming in and going through the checkout line even if you pay in cash.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    10. Re:no thanks by rfunches · · Score: 1

      Set yourself up a PO box, at a place that you can send things to....where they use 'Suite' No. instead of box number, so that it looks like a street address and companies will deliver there.
      You need to get a PMB where the business doesn't collect your personal information. A true PO box here in the US (at an actual post office) would require providing a verifiable name and address, and you have to present two types of ID, including one with a photograph.
    11. Re:no thanks by neglige · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to be seen going somewhere then take out your battery.
      That is what the jihadis do in Palestine and Occupied Iraq.


      I can only wish this was in the manual on how to build remotely triggered bombs:
      Remove battery from mobile phone, then attach phone to trigger mechanism. Detonate bomb by calling the attached phone. Remember: do not insert the battery again, as the phone can then be located!

      --
      My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
    12. Re:no thanks by Flipao · · Score: 1

      I am not a number, I am a free man!

    13. Re:no thanks by multisync · · Score: 1

      There's just some guy at xyz who knows that tall skinny guy with graying hair bought a lot of cereal half an hour ago.


      Plus a grainy, poorly-lit, black-and-white surveillance video that'll end up on America's Most Wanted.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    14. Re:no thanks by multisync · · Score: 1

      it's also ironic that if you click on his home page, he lists where he and his family were going to be in July


      You've hit the nail precicely on the head. No need for cel phones to track you, we'll just check your blog, or your Myspace, or your Facebook. People will react with outrage to something like this, all-the-while spewing out private information.

      This is Steve Rambam's take on privacy, lot's of fun if you haven't already listened to it.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    15. Re:no thanks by halber_mensch · · Score: 1

      Don't expect the governement to get it right if they cant realize when you put in a change of address for a new license and they will not send you notices that your registration is out of date to the new address I doubt they can figure anything else about you. I wouldn't jump to that conclusion so quickly - it's in the government's best interests that your registration expire, so that you can fund police with the ticket fee. Now if the IRS lost track of you so easily, I might be able to jump to that conclusion.
      --
      perl -e "eval pack(q{H*},join q{},qw{70 72696e74207061636b28717b482a7d2c717b343 637323635363534323533343430617d293b})"
    16. Re:no thanks by cez · · Score: 1

      This might be semi off topic, but if this does occur with your provider, or anything else for that matter that changes your contract or TOS, does anyone know if you can not except the new terms of the contract and force them to waive the early termination fee?

      --
      Walk with Music;
    17. Re:no thanks by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      There are things that I want and need people to know. My lifestyle, that I have chosen, necessitates that to some degree. As long as I have a decent degree of control in that regard I'm cool with it. I think about it a lot and try to make the best choices that I can.
       
      I don't want complete anonymity. I don't mind targeted advertising (I've found some neat things that way). But I'm not going to pay for a service that tracks this information constantly, and gives it to the highest bidder. Maybe I'm not consistent, but that's my opinion as of right now.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    18. Re:no thanks by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      The difference is between information being given as opposed to collected. Imagine meeting someone at a party and telling them where you live, your interests and other stuff like that. That would be pretty normal. On the other hand, if someone I had never met, walked up to me at a party and started telling me all kinds of things they knew because they had been following me for a few weeks - it would freak me out.
       
      As the post mentioned, my blog has a lot of info. on our recent trip. I thought a lot about putting that up. But the need to connect with a rather large (for me) group of people as opposed to worrying about robbery (I don't own much - no one would be home - so I figured it was worth it) was my choice to consider - as opposed to having someone else do it for me.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    19. Re:no thanks by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Interesting...would you go without google? Cause they're getting pretty close..

    20. Re:no thanks by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      Yeah - if they did anything that really bothered me. I'm not really a hard core privacy person. And by that I mean I don't do a lot to keep my life private personally. Right now, my on-line life is not something I'm worried about. It is easy for me to exclude stuff that I don't want showing up there. But tracking where I go physically would make it a lot easier for the dissemination of stuff I don't want 'out there'. Google doesn't do anything right now that threatens that barrier - to my knowledge.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    21. Re:no thanks by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      "i'd go without a cell phone before i'd let myself be tracked like that everywhere i go."

      Welcome to no cellphone land then. Your phone already tracks where you are.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    22. Re:no thanks by hazem · · Score: 1

      Muahahahahahahahahaha ahaha ahahaha...

      I love that show (The Prisoner, for those who don't know), but I think I like Dangerman even better.

    23. Re:no thanks by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      And is the data from that tracking stored somewhere and made available for sale to other companies? If so that's the kind of thing I would like to know.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    24. Re:no thanks by multisync · · Score: 1

      You are not alone feeling that way, judging from the number of people I know who use facebook etc, and post all manner of personal information. I also note how quickly people's phone numbers roll off their tongue when asked by random store clerks.

      Personally, I'm a bit more guarded, but I can take these things too far, I admit.

      If you follow the link in my last post, the person giving the talk - a skip tracer/pi, I guess you would call him - demonstrates what kind of information a person could legally obtain about you by knowing only your name, phone number and I think the city you live in (it's been a few months since I listened to it). The point he was making was that we are all making it easier on people like him to do his job, as we simply gush information about ourselves with our every action. Unfortunately, we are also making it easier on others to commit identity theft/fraud against us, by providing just the type of personal info that a bank may ask you to provide when you call in. I just dialed the 1-800 number for Visa and all they asked for was my Visa number (which a lot of stores still print out in full on their copy of the receipt) and the numbers for the month and year I was born (which you could get by googling me, or going to facebook or myspace, if I used either of those sites). After providing those two easily-obtained bits of info, I could have changed the mailing address for the account, ordered additional cards, applied for an increase in the limit, whatever.

      My point wasn't to criticize you, but to point out that if you find a cel phone that tracks your whereabouts creepy, you may already have one, or you may have OnStar, which is the same thing. Or you may be providing information about yourself on your family blog that tells the "creeps" what they wanted to know anyway.

      If your privacy matters to you, you need to be vigilant about it in all aspects of your life. If you're not willing/able to do that, there's not much point in worrying about what your cel phone is doing.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    25. Re:no thanks by skeeto · · Score: 1

      YARE - Yet Another Reason for Encryption

      Secure your communications. As a bonus, if you add onion routing to the mix no one can data mine any information about you whatsoever.

    26. Re:no thanks by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      My point wasn't to criticize you,
      I didn't take it that way, but thank you.
       
      I always tell clerks at stores no when they ask for my number. But the bottom line is for me, I make my living by being visible. People send checks to my home that pay my salary. I need a certain level of exposure. At the same time, I'm not going to carry a phone that sold my every move, if I could help it.
       
      I used to work as a dba/programmer for a collection agency. so I know a bit about skip tracing. I've played around with some of the tools myself. What would probably be more upsetting to some is I would try, for example, a reverse look-up service that we payed for and then try google. I often got better results out of google. To some extent, the cat is out of the bag, genie out of the bottle, whatever. But I do what makes sense for me as best I can. And most of my caution right now revolves around my kids. Once they are adults, I wont be nearly as worried about this stuff.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    27. Re:no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > I am not a number, I am a free man!

      "What do you want?"
      "Information."
      "Whose side are you on?"
      "That would be telling.... We want information. Information! INFORMATION!"
      "You won't get it."
      "By hook or by crook, we will."

    28. Re:no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a "ghost" cell for sale $5000. Never gets a bill, works in NA and Europe. No long distance to asia though :(

      Unfortunately the system is setup inside of a Qualcomm phone from the mid 90s...

      But if you want to be anonymous right :)

    29. Re:no thanks by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just found it funny is all :P I wouldn't particularly like being tracked everywhere, but as someone mentioned already with cellphones, I pretty much am. I don't have anything to hide at the moment anyway, all I do is go to work, go home, go to work, maybe go to the cinema, go home etc :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Next they'll be tracking me by retinal scans to see if its REALLY ME and I didn't just loan my device to a sibling, friend or child. Then it'll be cross-referenced with my credit report and my bank account to see if I can even afford it, but they won't care - they'll just offer me a new card with a limit that is just enough to cover whatever asinine product they're trying to force at me.

    and first post.

    1. Re:Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "and first post."

      Announcing "First post" is a good way to make the intertube overlords laugh ... And since you had your cell phone turned on when you posted your announcement, they know who and where you are!

      Now, would you like to buy this new "Web 2.0 Wristwatch" Mr. AC? We see that you have a need for it, and your credit balance is just enough for you to make this valuable purchase. Hurry! Supplies are limited! This offer won't last!

  3. Can't I just have the chip implanted already? by PoliTech · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really dont want to carry all those gadgets around, especially at the beach. So if you could just inject that RFID tag into my neck right here...

    1. Re:Can't I just have the chip implanted already? by Antarius · · Score: 1

      So if you could just inject that RFID tag into my neck right here...
      No-can-do, sorry. You see, the RFID tags cause interference with the implants from the super-secret CIA-alien-hybrid-mutant-dolphins(withfrickinglaser s) that you already have...

      Oh, sorry. That was not meant for publication.

      Sudo forget that you read this
    2. Re:Can't I just have the chip implanted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll let you pick which hand to have your sex monitoring chip put into, but I don't think neck is an option.

    3. Re:Can't I just have the chip implanted already? by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1

      Hey. No problem. http://www.digitalangelcorp.com/ />

    4. Re:Can't I just have the chip implanted already? by Obsi · · Score: 0

      sudo read more hkcd

  4. Data bill by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    cell phones and pda uses may end have to pay the data bill for ads that they may not even want and how many people will want to waste there battery's on Bluetooth for this?

    1. Re:Data bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your spelling and grammar are so bad that I think it gave me cancer.

      "Cell phones and PDA users may end up having to pay the data bill for ads that they may not even want, and how many people will want to waste their batteries on Bluetooth for this?

  5. Consumer participation required? by ricebowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From reading the synopsis it seems that it would require the participation/consent of the mobile phone user to allow tracking. From activating bluetooth visibility, or accepting a phone with an RFID feature. It'd be interesting to see if this has any similarity to the oft-rumoured GPhone.

    But why would a consumer, given the relatively low prices of cell phones, tariffs and contracts, accept this? I'm speaking from the UK but I can't imagine that US cell contracts, etc, are so prohibitively expensive that this would be an attractive form of subsidy. Especially given the potential 'government interest.'

    1. Re:Consumer participation required? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      For the time being it's voluntarily/consent based. How long 'til blocking ads becomes illegal because it deprives those pages dependent on ad income from revenue, and how long 'til you must not block your phone to inform the ad company how well their ads work because of the need of transparency in business?

      Impossible? You might remember the motion that it should be illegal to FF through ads in movies. And you might have noticed that some DVD players don't let you skip ads, previews and other nuisances.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Consumer participation required? by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      But why would a consumer, given the relatively low prices of cell phones, tariffs and contracts, accept this?
      If nobody offers plans without this, the only way to get a cell plan is to accept this.
      --
      (IANAL)
    3. Re:Consumer participation required? by BUL2294 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you might have noticed that some DVD players don't let you skip ads, previews and other nuisances.
      It's not that the DVD players don't let you skip these nuisances, it's that the chapter/title/whatever tells the DVD player to not let you skip them. There are valid reasons why you shouldn't be allowed to skip chapters on some DVDs (i.e. a DVD-video based game played on your TV, or an educational DVD that tests you and your answers determine the next question, etc.) but, IMHO, no DVD movie that you paid $$$ for has a valid reason for not allowing you to skip chapters. The studios are just abusing the system and pissing off their customers... (Hence the popularity of DVD movie backup software that lets you rip the feature film only...)
      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    4. Re:Consumer participation required? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Those are valid reasons for me not being allowed to do something I want with the hardware I own? Sorry, but they are not. I can see that those are functions that you would want in a machine used for the purpose of testing, but when the day ends, the owner of the box has to have the right to make it do whatever he wants (within the reasonable limits of the machine, no reason to demand a latte from your DVD player...).

      Generally, the owner and only the owner of the machine has to dictate what features the machine is capable of are to be turned on or off. Certainly not the creator of content. If the hardware does not allow me, its owner, to override the wishes of the content manufacturer, it is not the hardware I want. If that means I can't get certain hardware at all, so be it. Ok. I will live without HDDVD.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Consumer participation required? by Pragmatix · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why would someone participate in this?

      Let's say you went to the mall, and you were looking for some Christmas gifts. You phone has a neat little feature called 'Instant Discount'. If you turn it on while shopping, it will feed you coupons and specials from the various stores as you walk around. So you pass a Banana Republic and see a coupon for 25$ off on a pair of pants.

      You duck in, get some pants, save some cash. The store gets a sale they might not have had. Whoever runs the ad service gets a little piece of the sale. Everyone is happy.

      I have no problem with this kind of feature, as long as you can turn it on or off.

    6. Re:Consumer participation required? by Ciarang · · Score: 1

      You didn't save any cash, you spent some that you didn't intend to spend.

    7. Re:Consumer participation required? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I suspect it's aimed at kids. Hey kids, here's a free cell phone!

    8. Re:Consumer participation required? by BUL2294 · · Score: 1

      If the hardware does not allow me, its owner, to override the wishes of the content manufacturer, it is not the hardware I want.
      You'll find no argument from me... However, I have yet to come across a DVD player that overrides the chapter/title/whatever's ban on skipping or seeking. Does that mean you'll go back to VHS? No bans there. Hell, if a VHS tape has an ad or a preview at the beginning, you could even open up the tape, cut out the "offending" content, and splice the tape back together. Now you can claim to control the content. But alas, I doubt you would go thru all that effort...

      So you won't be going to HD-DVD. But according to your argument, you shouldn't even be using DVDs...
      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    9. Re:Consumer participation required? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh, there are quite a few computer based DVD players that allow me to watch whatever I please.

      One should note, though, that in some countries it isn't illegal to alter the binary of software, as long as you do it yourself...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Consumer participation required? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we know how well that business model worked out.

    11. Re:Consumer participation required? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Ah, but they still required their subscribers to PAY for their airtime. An ad supported phone has the advantage that you don't have to go chasing after your customers to get them to pay their bills.

    12. Re:Consumer participation required? by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      However, I have yet to come across a DVD player that overrides the chapter/title/whatever's ban on skipping or seeking.

      Cheap import DVD players are your best bet there. They have rather bare bones software that often doesn't include such "features" as overiding your abailty to skip chapter to chapter.

      --
      We are all just people.
    13. Re:Consumer participation required? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Why can't the store just advertise the discount in their window?

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    14. Re:Consumer participation required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you DID save some cash because he said explicitly you were "looking for presents". Thus instead of buying a similar style gift in another shop, you get the item from said advertised shop at a discounted price. I'm not entirely sure what kind of stupid-logic you went through to come up with your repertoire.

    15. Re:Consumer participation required? by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Less is more.

  6. So basically... by shakingbrave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are going to track who I call, where I go, and what I buy...while having all of this linked to personally identifying information. Who in their right mind would subscribe to such a service? The privacy implications are mind boggling...if the police can subpena this information or the government can "silently" access it, say goodbye to the American way of life...

    1. Re:So basically... by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The privacy implications are mind boggling

      The privacy implications of a phone that reports back to ad agencies isn't nearly as mind boggling as the Fed's new law that says all US/international communications can be bugged with no search warrant needed. The American way of life is already long gone. The problem is that nobody seems to care.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:So basically... by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if the police can subpena this information or the government can "silently" access it, say goodbye to the American way of life... I thought that WAS the American way of life. We are living in a post-9/11 world, after all.
    3. Re:So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but they give you free stuff in exchange!

    4. Re:So basically... by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm more worried about what various companies will do with the info, than the government.

      Also, think about the false positives on matches - artificially inflating prcies for places using those advertisers.

      I just hope capitalism "works" as it is supposed to, and this marketing idea flops, when it ends up costing more than other methods, for a similar amount of return.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    5. Re:So basically... by ArcadeX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not saying i'm for this in any way, but if the phone were provided free, and the add company paid for the phone / service via the adds, I could see older people on budgets, or broke teens not having a problem trading freedoms for services.

      --
      An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
    6. Re:So basically... by humpierbus · · Score: 1

      I care :(

    7. Re:So basically... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "Here! Free cell with your new contract! And 1000 text messages free on top of it! And that's not all, you get 100 local calls or 100 local minutes, whatever is MORE (not less. MORE!)."

      "No, no need to read the fine print. It's just that you report back when you buy some crap. But hey, you don't pay for that reporting call, don't worry!"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:So basically... by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      Older people? I highly doubt that. As long as it's shiny and cool and can play their music wherever they go, it'll be the kids and 20-somethings that are all over this...

    9. Re:So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this American way of life that you talk about? We haven't heard of that in ages (7-8 years).

    10. Re:So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:So basically... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Which means we should all clamor for bigger government protecting us from the boogeyman, that was created from the government's asinine foreign policy decisions? It's time we just get rid of the "elite" politicians in general and start from a clean slate. We had a good thing going for about 200 years, we could do it again.

    12. Re:So basically... by vranash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the real question is, which of you wanna be called terrorists while leading the armed revolution to make it happen? There's a reason nobody's done it yet and there's a reason it probably won't happen within our lifetime.

  7. what a crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    most of the places I got to, I got to via personal recommendation.

    Not to mention, that would require a corporate agency tracking my every move. I'll just put it this way:
    If you don't trust the government, ostensibly supposed to be for the benefit of the people living in its juristiction, watching your every move, how the hell can you trust a corporation, ostensibly (and in practice) supposed to be for the financial and power gain of those in cahrge of the company, to keep track of you to that extent?

    1. Re:what a crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A corporation cannot arrest you (yet).

    2. Re:what a crock by superbus1929 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it some of these same corporations that made it so that recording was an arrestable offence now, instead of just something for civil courts?

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    3. Re:what a crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better tell the RIAA.

    4. Re:what a crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are these "personal recommendations" properly regulated? Legitimate advertisers have licences to cite trademarks, unlike you and your scofflaw friends. Given your proven antisocial behaviour, I expect you "recommend" pornography to children!

  8. Gasp! by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Companies are trying to evaulate to see if their marketing is working or not. How dare they, I want to be flooded with adds that I don't care about, vs. showing me products and or services that may help me in life, with sites offering better tracking services they could charge more per add, thus less adds per page. But that is not the slashdot way, we want NO adds but still we want our websites to run for free even though these people deticate their lives full time to this and have expenses too. Good targeting means less adds, more revenue to web sites, and less anoyances during the day. If Big Brother wants to know your spending habbits they just need a warent and pull your bank information. No need for this crazy loosy goosy stuff, that will mostly help make your life better.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Gasp! by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      Too many false positives is the problem:

      I buy online from newegg all the time, and buy.com frequently. I got these from recommendations from friends and associates, not advertisements. In fact, I didn't see an ad for either for over a year after I started using them.

      I go to the local microcenter also - not because of adds, but because I'm in a hurry, and it's where my dad went and I knew about it.

      The list could be very long, but the vast majority of where I go, and what services I use are from recommendations by people. I think this method is much worse than what is already out there - a simple question when you purchase saying "where did you hear about us?"

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:Gasp! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If Big Brother wants to know your spending habbits they just need a warent and pull your bank information.

      Hah, the jokes on you. The only withdrawals I make from the bank are to pay for housing/utilities/ATMs/Credit Cards. Now, if they pulled my Visa bill...

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Gasp! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      But you just spreaded word of mouth adverting for thoses sites. So what you just did was give people more confidence in buying products from this site figueing that if you got a good deal so can they. And you went to the site because of word of mouth. But what about those people who told you perhaps they saw an add on favorate search tool and clicked on it. If one Add gets some attention and spreads Word of Mouth then it may be worth the false positives. Just for the sake if you bought something form X.com and they show adds to you couple times every week and someone says where did you get that its cool you may remember more clearly that you got it from X.com. Or if the next time you are looking for something you may take a look at X.com for it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Gasp! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The joke is back to you.... Your Visa bill is processed threw a bank. It may not be the same bank wich you have your savings account but it is still a bank.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Gasp! by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      That logic only works if they advertised with only one agency, ever.

      Otherwise there's a lot of false positives for any given agency.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    6. Re:Gasp! by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Informative

      But that is not the slashdot way, we want NO adds but still we want our websites to run for free even though these people deticate their lives full time to this and have expenses too. Good targeting means less adds, more revenue to web sites, and less anoyances during the day.

      Okay... here's some small tips that may help:

      • If a website or other media delivery vehicle tends to specialize (e.g. /. tends to specialize in IT and geek pr0n), you tailor your advertisements to your primary market. If I go to a 3d/CG hobbyist art website, I expect to see ads for the likes of Poser, Bryce, DAZ, etc, with maybe some low-end Maya, 3DS Max and such thrown in. I don't expect to see mortgage ads in either place. (If I do, then obviously the site owner is operating sans clue, which almost subliminally makes my opinion of the content to be a bit suspect. After all, if they can't grok their audience, then how do I know that they truly grok what they're presenting otherwise?)
      • This does not require complex GPS tracking, retina scanning, or any other such crap. It merely means that the site owners need to know their primary and secondary readership.
      • For general purpose websites (like a newspaper, say) you can use cookies based on what type of content the user reads more often than not. Again, no need to an RFID chip in someone's left ear to do that
      • Even on a mobile scale, the best way to know if an ad works is the old-fashioned way, just updated: Put a friggin' "Save X% off your purchase if you display the linked coupon page on your iPhone/Treo/etc to the server at the counter!" with some unique splotch of numbers and letters on that "coupon" can that can be punched in by the guy taking your money. See? No need to assign facial recognition software to every mobile's camera or something...

      In short, there are a ton of ways to make your advertising revenue work for you (as a business) and at the same time not have to resort to some bullshit intrusion that only adds bloat and inconvenience to the user's equipment and resources.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    7. Re:Gasp! by riceboy50 · · Score: 1

      with sites offering better tracking services they could charge more per add, thus less adds per page They could reduce the number of ads per page, but that is not likely to happen. The companies I've seen will move the higher profit from each unit straight to the bottom line—and probably consider adding even more units to increase profit further.
      --
      ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    8. Re:Gasp! by misleb · · Score: 1

      Companies are trying to evaulate to see if their marketing is working or not. How dare they, I want to be flooded with adds that I don't care about, vs. showing me products and or services that may help me in life


      False dichotomy. How about no ads at all? Nah, forget it. Somebody needs to be a sucker and accept the ads and leave the blocking to those who actually care about taking control over what they view and how they view it. Let sites make money off of fools who think they are somehow obligated to accept advertising because that is how some people make money. As long as there are enough people like you, people like me can block all ads and nobody cares.

      Good targeting means less adds


      No, it does not. It just means people selling ad space will make that much more money. There is still X amount of advertising space available. It WILL be filled. It'll just be more targeted.

      more revenue to web sites


      Sure, as long as they keep the same number of ads.

      and less anoyances during the day.


      An ad shoved in my face is no less annoying because it is targeted. In some ways it is actually be more annoying. Imagine a world like "Minority Report" where every ad calls you by name and knows more than it should about you. That is not just annoying, but downright creepy. We're getting closer and closer to that every day.

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    9. Re:Gasp! by bmetzler · · Score: 1

      Apparently 3d/CG hobbyists either rent, live with their parents perpetually, or just happen to have plenty of cash to buy a nice home outright. Either way, who's ever heard of a 3d/CG hobbyist being interested in buying a house and actually needing a mortgage for it.

    10. Re:Gasp! by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      Good targeting means less adds


                o.O

      BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

    11. Re:Gasp! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Apparently 3d/CG hobbyists either rent, live with their parents perpetually, or just happen to have plenty of cash to buy a nice home outright. Either way, who's ever heard of a 3d/CG hobbyist being interested in buying a house and actually needing a mortgage for it.

      You'd be amazed; I bought a house less than two months ago. That said, I didn't rely on a stupid flash animation on a site that had nothing to do with houses to guide my decisions as to which lender I went with.

      As it is, 3D/CG hobbyist tools aren't expensive at all nowadays; between Free* Software (e.g. Blender, POV-Ray, DAZ|Studio, Bryce, GIMP), low-cost creation, compositing, render, and workflow tools (Vue d'Esprit, Carrara, Poser, Silo, Rhino, etc), and relatively cheap entry-level points for high-end tools (Maya PLE, Modo, 3D Studio VIZ, etc)? I daresay that I spend less per year on 3D tools and occasional content than the average slashdotter spends on consoles and games. The most expensive bit in my little hobby was the $2000 Power Mac Dual G5 I bought in 2004, which keeps up quite happily, and can be expected to do so for at least the next 2-3 years.

      It's actually a lot more affordable (and a whole lot more flexible and powerful) than the half-working bug-laden crap we were all stuck with in 2001, trust me.

      *"Free" as in speech and/or beer.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    12. Re:Gasp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the point of ads to try and get your attention when you don't really feel like paying attention in the first place? Otherwise they'd just be informative.

  9. Can you say "Minority Report" by jag7720 · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the scene where they are scanning your eyes and offering advertising or know what you bought last... "How did you like those t-shirts Mr. Johnson?" No thanks

    1. Re:Can you say "Minority Report" by cerelib · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here is the scary thing. I think most marketing professionals saw Minority Report and said, "That's the greatest idea ever!"

    2. Re:Can you say "Minority Report" by starglider29a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They said the same thing about the "mark of the beast". "That no man may buy or sell without..."

      It is and has been a great idea for nearly 2000 years... if you can ignore the downside.

    3. Re:Can you say "Minority Report" by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Here is the scary thing. I think most marketing professionals saw Minority Report and said, "That's the greatest idea ever!" I saw the "making of" documentary on the Hellraiser DVD. The Hellraiser production team were all like "What's some of the sickest, craziest shit we can put on film? Man, look at these cenobytes. You know what people are going to say when they see this?" And then they cut over to the body modification crowd. "Man, I so want to do that!" the guy with spikes in his face said.

      We need to invent some sort of new axiom for today's strange new world: "Show a group some crazy fucking shit on the internet, 99% will be disgusted and 1% will be inspired." This goes for scat, self-mutilation, BDSM, goatse, tubgirl, furries, and religious fundamentalism.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  10. It begins by MarcoG42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've never been one of the people that sports a tinfoil hat, and now I can't because they'll know when I go to the store, what I bought, how much I payed for it and what I was thinking when I bought it.

    --
    If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
  11. Google by tsstahl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    is probably buying the company as we type.

    Sounds like just the hook to make Gphone attractive to advertisers.

  12. Now I will generate revenue for somebody by crovira · · Score: 4, Funny

    without my knowledge of who, what or where, just by going to work everyday.

    1. Set up a surveillance society,
    2. Watch everybody all the time,
    3. ???
    4. Profit

    Steps 1 & 2 are already happening whether we want them to or not. Its a done deal.

    But the greedy little prick wants to patent it too.

    God I wish I had balls that big.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  13. Just another reason. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    not to have a cell phone. Whenever anyone asks why I don't have a phone, my standard answer is:

    "Don't need one, don't want one. Besides, why would I want people to be able to track where I am?"

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Just another reason. . . by ArcadeX · · Score: 1

      Hm. I wonder if anyone makes a phone case / carrier that's made with wire mesh or tinfoil to stop signal. That would be something I would be interested in, wouldn't use it all the time, to married to the convience of incoming calls, but I could see situations where someone wouldn't want to be tracked, or give others the ability to find them. Granted, several of the instances I am seeing are for illegal activies...

      --
      An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
    2. Re:Just another reason. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the blonde joke:

      I gave my blonde GF a phone on my account and she took it with her to the mall. She was on her way back to her car when I called her to ask how long she would be away, and she said to me, "How did you know I was here?"

    3. Re:Just another reason. . . by theelectron · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone makes a phone case / carrier that's made with wire mesh or tinfoil to stop signal.
      Or, you could turn your cell phone off. Depending on how paranoid you are, you could even take out the battery. ...unless my browser is filtering out the sarcasm tags, in which case I apologize.
    4. Re:Just another reason. . . by ArcadeX · · Score: 1

      or RFID on your mobile devices to track your travels If they put that on a cel phone, pulling the battery won't help.
      --
      An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
    5. Re:Just another reason. . . by theelectron · · Score: 1

      Eh, then you just pull out the RFID tag and swap it with someone else, just to mess with 'em.

    6. Re:Just another reason. . . by dwye · · Score: 1

      > Hm. I wonder if anyone makes a phone case / carrier
      > that's made with wire mesh or tinfoil to stop signal.

      Reynolds Aluminum and Alcoa both make these. They are called ...

      Aluminum foil. Just wrap the phone yourself!

      Also, any all-metal lunchbox would work.

    7. Re:Just another reason. . . by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Sounds like something for

      <shameless_ostg_plug>
      Thinkgeek
      </shameless_ostg_plug>
      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  14. Tinfoil Hat by krgallagher · · Score: 1
    "...uses GPS, Bluetooth, or RFID on your mobile devices to track your travels to see if you wander into a place of business that appeared in an ad shown earlier on your cellphone, PDA, or laptop.

    Wow! I thought big brother was a problem. Now we have to watch out for big business too.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

    1. Re:Tinfoil Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Business bought Big Brother long ago.

    2. Re:Tinfoil Hat by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      His new patent seems to be quite similar to what Katherine Albrecht had warned against back in October 2005 in the book "SPYCHIPS: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Purchase and Watch Your Every Move." She not only warns us about business tracking us with RFID tags but also mentions to other related technologies such as shopper's ID cards. I can't recall if she specifically mentioned cell phones and GPS devices or not, but she definitely discusses the idea of "targeted advertising" and various related technologies. She had also founded Spychips.com and NoCards.org as opposition to that general type of thing.

      Perhaps the inventor might have also seen a couple of the examples of tracking and "targeted advertising" that were in the movie "Minority Report."

      Back before he supposedly invented the idea, I had already purchased an RFID blocking wallet and started leaving my cell phone behind in my truck, before entering shopping malls. That was to protect my privacy against his not yet invented new idea.

    3. Re:Tinfoil Hat by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      I thought big brother was a problem. Now we have to watch out for big business too.

      You mean, there's a difference?

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  15. This just tells me... by Bullfish · · Score: 1

    that cell phone hacking will be the next big wave. Of course, this will start a whole new round of DCMA shenanigans and the chase will be on between the phone companies and their customers. Bad consumer, bad!!

    1. Re:This just tells me... by jag7720 · · Score: 1

      Uh... that is what th Neo1973 and OpenMoko is for
      http://www.openmoko.org/

    2. Re:This just tells me... by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      It is good, but it is just a peek into what I think the scene will be like in three or four years. I hope the project grows and thrives. There are hacking tools now, but they will get much better and extend across all phones.

  16. I've got two words for you... by lazycam · · Score: 1

    Terrible idea. If it is not enough that the NSA and FBI already track the behavior of citizens..*cough*...suspected terrorist without much oversight, what happens when they add this company's technology to its set of tools to monitor our activities. Looks like I'll be moving to Canada or Greenland soon...

    --
    my mom posts on slashdot.
    1. Re:I've got two words for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the NSA added this company's technology to its set of tools to monitor our activities it would be setting itself back many decades :)

  17. Walk-fraud by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    1. Employees of a company all visit the ad of a competitor on their cellphones
    2. They put all their cell phones in a box
    3. A gopher takes the box of phones to the competitor's store, loiters for a few minutes, and comes back
    4. UNprofit for the competitor as the pay-for-visit system deducts a bunch of money from the competitor's ad account

    OK, its not very scalable, but it is amusing and will happen.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Walk-fraud by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ohhh... I can so see flashmobs for this. I mean, sure, flashmobs ain't really in fashion anymore, but I can smell a revival.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Walk-fraud by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1
      I can also see the reverse happening.
      1. Ad agency gets a contract for a company that has lots of existing customers.
      2. Said agency sends ads to existing customers.
      3. Customers go to the company's store regardless of the ad.
      4. Profit for the ad agency since they "generated" so many visits.
    3. Re:Walk-fraud by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      And both are circumvented by "If the customer uses the coupon presented to him on his phone, the advertiser gets a cut of the profit". That was hard.

  18. Minority Report the Prequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paranoia, it's not just a mental deficiency, it's a way of life

    The year was 2007, the patent was issued, it wasn't long before it went online and shortly after, the war...

    1. Re:Minority Report the Prequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Paranoia, it's not just a mental deficiency, it's a way of life

      It's not paranoia if they really are out to get you. And it's not Paranoia unless the Computer isn't out to get you. (The Computer isn't out to get you. The Computer couldn't be out to get you, because the Computer is your Friend. Trust the Computer. Happiness is mandatory. You are happy, aren't you?)

      "Only the Paranoid survive"
      - Andy Gro-V-e, CEO, Intel Corp. (He was rumored to have actually been Ultraviolet, but I wasn't cleared to hear that rumo-*BZZT*

  19. What does the customer get out of this? by immcintosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I guess that question wouldn't matter for a less invasive advertising platform, but what this seems to be proposing is currently impossible without the customer's explicit agreement and cooperation. So I'm wondering what they plan on giving the customer to make this ever remotely appealing?

    1. Re:What does the customer get out of this? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Three free ringtones of your choice, some limitations apply, requires activation of special ringtone account for $40/month and minimum contract of two months.

      Believe me, people will be all over it..as far as they see it, they are losing nothing but are gaining three free ringtones. All they have to do is remember to cancel their subscription to that special ringtone service after two months.

      $40 in 30 days is $0 right now to most people. Its one reason everyone's so in debt.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:What does the customer get out of this? by wannasleep · · Score: 1

      E911 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E911) already tracks you when you are in the US... sorry....

  20. How do they get the location data? by klingens · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What allows them to access my cellphone remotely and access its GPS receiver? Why would my cellphone tell them the GPS location in the first place?
    Are there really phones on the market which allow this? If so, what prevents evil terrorist(tm) to do the same as this company then? Are phonemakers terrorism supporters?!one!?eleven!

    1. Re:How do they get the location data? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Are there really phones on the market which allow this?

      Sure - Disney and lots of smaller outfits have phones that do exactly that - so that parents can track their kids' whereabouts at all times, remotely.

      Kinda creepy that corporations want to treat adults in the same manner, ne?

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:How do they get the location data? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      It's the "E911" stuff. Many new phones have at least some software for responding to cell towers (and sometimes even limited GPS ability) and this information is sent to the cell network, which can get reasonably precise location from triangulation and such among cell towers. See here and here.

      My Verizon Treo 650 came with the default of transmitting its location data all the time. Fortunately, there was a (somewhat buried) option to turn it to "911 only". Of course, if you read the above link, you'll see that the cell company can get a pretty good handle on my location if they wanted just by triangulation anyway.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  21. "Good afternoon, Mr. Yakamoto," by apodyopsis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    let me be the first to say "Good afternoon, Mr. Yakamoto,".

    http://curtismorley.com/2007/02/06/minority-report -and-mini-cooper/

    Personalized advertising just jumped out of the cookie jar (no, get your mind off the choc chips lardy, I'm talking browsers here) and into the real world. Somehow the idea of large corporations tracking me makes me feel a great unease, we can trust them to value money over common decency and politeness.

  22. Big Brother! OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, look at all the conspiracy theorists! Sounds like Pelago wants to make some sort of new social network that ties in with consumerism.

    It might be popular, widely popular, given the density of MySpace's average fanatic.

  23. sounds great by syrinx · · Score: 1

    Marketers will be able to find out just how effective their ads are. When the answer turns out to be "not at all", they'll all lose their jobs, and we'll live in an advertising-free world.

    (And while I'm dreaming, I'd like a free moon pony.)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  24. Just so you know... by moosehooey · · Score: 1

    Something like 95% of patents never actually make it into production. People patent the stupidest things, just check out google patent search http://www.google.com/patents and see all the crap that people pay good money to patent. People also patent things for other reasons besides wanting to produce the invention, such as to sell the patent, or to keep a competitor from using the invention. Just because it shows up in a patent application doesn't mean it'll be coming out in the near future. Heck, there are plenty of patents for perpetual motion machines, which stopped after the patent office started demanding a working example.

  25. Consumer opt-out action required by Radon360 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From reading the synopsis it seems that it would require the participation/consent of the mobile phone user to allow tracking

    FWIW, this tracking is enabled by default in virtually every phone that has the capabiliity of being commercially tracked. The phone user has to recognize that it is enabled and then go through the menus to turn it off. Not a hard thing to do, but like most things, something that is largely overlooked by the masses.

  26. That will be the day ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    when I stop using mobile phones ... As soon as ads are on my phone, I'm done.

    And for the record, I NEVER buy/go anywhere/do anything based on an ad but only on what my needs and wants really are.
    Obviously I'm not the typical consumer nor will I ever be. I actually peel all the stickers and badges off of everything
    I have, laptops/computers, cars, equipment, tools, etc. I just don't like the look of all that crap.

    1. Re:That will be the day ... by Code+Master · · Score: 1
      I peel the stickers off stuff too. They always look hideous and distracting.

      Heck I even take the consumer only tags off pillows and matresses.

      To me, that is one of the reasons MacBooks look so much nicer compared to PC laptops. They aren't covered in Intel Inside stickers, Made for Windows XP stickers, cheap manufacturer stickers, warning stickers on the back, warrenty void stickers, etc...

      --
      The Code Master
    2. Re:That will be the day ... by inviolet · · Score: 1

      And for the record, I NEVER buy/go anywhere/do anything based on an ad but only on what my needs and wants really are.

      True enough. But marketing is only half "raise consumer awareness of new products". This is the half that is, generally, a social benefit.

      The other half -- the dark half -- is "adjust the consumer's wants". This is the half that is, at best, a zero sum game. It is the half that makes marketers hate themselves, on those rare occasions when they allow themselves to grasp its nature.

      And the line between the two is a diffuse swath of grey unknowability.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    3. Re:That will be the day ... by dwye · · Score: 1

      > And for the record, I NEVER buy/go anywhere/do anything based
      > on an ad but only on what my needs and wants really are.

      That is what they have programmed you to believe.

      > I actually peel all the stickers and badges off of everything
      > have, laptops/computers, cars, equipment, tools, etc.

      And no one will recognize your car after you remove the emblems, of course (ignoring the way that promotes rust). BTW, how do you get the "Craftsman" or "Snap-Tite" off your wrench set?

  27. Another software patent?! by absorbr · · Score: 1

    How the hell is this patentable? You've got several technologies that already exist (USB/Wifi/GSM/RFID, etc), all tied together with software. The only thing this plan describes is using the technologies for the purposes for which they were designed -- transmitting and receiving data. The USPO is CLUELESS if this gets approved!

  28. Neat! I can't wait by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    Being a grumpy old git there are many businesses whose crappy advertising annoys me. With this new system i can write a script to hit all their websites 50 times a day and it will then cost them money every time i walk past their outlet. I may even go into the shop to say 'muahahahaha, pwned'

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:Neat! I can't wait by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Being a grumpy old git there are many businesses whose crappy advertising annoys me. With this new system i can write a script to hit all their websites 50 times a day and it will then cost them money every time i walk past their outlet. I may even go into the shop to say 'muahahahaha, pwned'

      Why stop at 50? w/ an unlimited data plan and an appetite for walking-as-exercise, I can blast out thousands of hits per minute that get read by /dev/null as I stroll around downtown... a bicycle and a portable charger can increase the damage almost exponentially.

      (besides, it'd be kinda funny to watch some market-prioritied corporation actually pay someone to let me use their bathroom or something w/o buying a thing. Plus, I can use it as a guide to which stores I'd rather avoid spending money at. :) )

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  29. Can I be the first to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patent something that will stop this in its tracks?

    My idea is a little LEAD Lined bag that will stop your phone, blackberry etc from activating this nasty invasion of privacy.
    Oh sorry, that already exists. Just go out and buy one of those bags that we used to stop those pesky airport X-Rays from messing up our films when we came home from Vacation.

    Seriously,
      This is one nasty proposal. I don't want all this crap. How long will it be before the spammers invade these systems so that along with the ads for your favoutite fast food you get viagra and other crap blasted at you all the time.
      No NO No No.
      Please USPTO, Throw this in the wastebin ASAP.

    1. Re:Can I be the first to by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Actually, copper would be a much better material to use. Silver would be even better, but more expensive.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
  30. Stalking for fun and Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone else noticed the disturbing [to me, anyway] trend towards actions being illegal if performed by a private individual, but legally acceptable if performed by a corporation, for profit?

    1. Re:Stalking for fun and Profit by CowboyCapo · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe the term you are looking for is Corporate Extraterritoriality.

      In short, the giving of the rights of nations to corporations. And yeah, it sucks Ebola-diseased donkey gonads, just like the advertising jackhole who came up with this idea.

  31. this sounds invasive by josepha48 · · Score: 1

    it sounds to me like an invasion of privacy. They are using tech to track where you are and what you just watched or saw. This just sounds so intrusive, I think I'm going to be sick.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

    1. Re:this sounds invasive by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I think I'm going to be sick.

      You just took a trip to your doctor. Would you like to buy some pharmacy online?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:this sounds invasive by absorbr · · Score: 1

      Surely you can opt out -- unless the phone service were free, paid for instead by the advertising revenue. Otherwise, yes I'd agree with you. Also, you could always just turn your phone off until you needed it I suppose, which wouldn't work for everyone but to combat it, yes that's what I'd do.

  32. WAAAAH Slashdotters by DarthTeufel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Uh... would you take targeted advertising if it meant a FREE cell phone (ie GooglePhone)? The answer is yes.

    1. Re:WAAAAH Slashdotters by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  33. Patent! by f00man · · Score: 1

    Luddite tech...

    After ringing up sale, clerk says, "May I ask where you heard about us?"

    Holey cats!

    Calls patent attorney -- It's business method!)

  34. I have two simple, effective words for Pelago... by fallen1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fuck. You.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  35. Fuck this by slayermet420 · · Score: 1

    There is no god damn this should be allowed. A company tracking me through GPS and through the calls I dial, all while sending ads to me? Does anyone else see the potential for abuse, if this gets cracked, allowing stalkers to use the GPS signal to see where people go, or see who someone calls?

    --
    Geeks strike again 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  36. Wunderbar by Cleon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, yay. Yet another way for big business to keep track of places we go, the food we eat, the air we breathe.

    It's only a matter of time before toilets start detecting our DNA in order to show us targeted ads on the the stall door while we take a shit.

    --
    Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
    1. Re:Wunderbar by khraz · · Score: 1

      [i]It's only a matter of time before toilets start detecting our DNA in order to show us targeted ads on the the stall door while we take a shit.[/i] You know, this is an excellent idea *rushes to patent office*.

  37. Previous Work of Art Here by WebbedWell · · Score: 1

    I briefly talked about some of it on my blog. Good thing I did. http://geekspeaker.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!588D13 9CAFEFE462!921.entry I've been working on a similar system for over a year. I didn't think someone was going to patent it. I assume Google has been working on a similar method for quite some time. I have diagrams that go back for over a year when I first had the idea. I've been trying to get some folks at my company more involved but it takes forever to get my ideas moving at my company. It's pretty frustrating to see something like this get a patent on it. The reason why this is so important is so many people spend more money via their cars which means advertising could be sucked back out of the internet in the not so near future perhaps.

  38. And in other news ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    And in other news, the government has announced a program that is able to predict murders before they occur, and identifies the culprit who can be arrested before committing the crime.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  39. "Free" ad-supported phone, anyone? by dkt5 · · Score: 1

    Maybe the whole point of this is to offer the phones and service to consumers who don't value their privacy, at no (monetary) cost? Maybe all local area calls are free, and long distance can be enabled by depositing funds to pay-as-you-go.

    That way, they can offer phones where the capability to track and report and snoop on the user is built in and cannot be disabled.

    Some people are stupid enough to go for it - and they might also be the ones that actually buy the stuff advertised in those wonderfully helpful emails the rest of us ignore as 'spam'. :)

    1. Re:"Free" ad-supported phone, anyone? by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      That way, they can offer phones where the capability to track and report and snoop on the user is built in and cannot be disabled.

      Or, a monopolistic phone company could make it a condition of service, thereby leaving their customers with no choice.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    2. Re:"Free" ad-supported phone, anyone? by monxrtr · · Score: 1

      Only the government can create a monopolistic phone company, by restricting spectrum, by regulations, patents, etc.

      Ads are less attentively watched than ever. Perhaps most people already immediately associate "bad deal" rather than "good deal" with ads that appear when and where they do.

      This is just marketing desperation as more people than ever take more active measures to block them out. The people that accept "free" products for advertisement spam last shorter and shorter as well. How many even kids would get duped again and again into giving away personal info and wasting time for their "XBOX 360 WINNER" flashing banner ad? Even those ads have negatively effected other ads.

      Let me be the contrarian and say "it's over" for marketing and advertising agencies. It's just a matter of time until corporations learn that those advertising and marketing measures are *hurting* corporate brands rather than helping them, in a big majority of cases. It's a slow process because marketing and advertising teams will FUD their employers to prolong their paychecks. Google is already starting to compete against future competition by not holding personal identifying information for as long. Not only are companies throwing money away paying marketers, but they are harming their brand value in the process.

      It's simple supply and demand. The explosion of spam has rendered each ad, even the best, most quality informing ad, less valuable. It's fine if google wants to surround searches with the highest paid ads. I'm sure most people already probably default think those are the worst deals you could possibly get.

      Using "big name" music in ads is a turnoff now too. When Supermarkets realize you are less likely to go back because some stupid television screen advertisement is playing in the checkout lane, they'll get rid of those televisions too. Same for the mall food courts televisions. It's a massive cultural tuning out of spam on many many levels.

      Don't forget, the internet pretty much made travel agents extinct, as people started getting competitive quotes for airfare and hotels on-line. Movie theaters don't seem to be doing too well selling commercials for longer periods of time before movies start.

      Not to mention, people that accept ad-supported phones are probably not anywhere near the highly desired demographic targets.

      Advertising must be regarded as "content" that is competing against other "non-advertising" content. That's why people change channels, switch stations, walk on the other side of the street. When your message makes people want to avoid you, that's not good for business. If you could watch regular peoples' reactions to ads the same way they watch their reactions to political debate candidates talking, a lot of people are in for a rude spam-awakening.

      Well I think the next big corporate expense cutting victims will be their spamming "marketing departments". I think you will see cable channels facing market pressure (declining viewers) because of how bad their advertising is. Unavoidable ad spam lowers the value of DVDs. Seems like a lot of fat that is negatively impacting their bottom lines even more than just the numerical expenses.

      Just remember all the waste and spam, and inefficient quality and pricing of travel agencies compared to now. People spend more time on internet message boards with the free content of others now then they used to watching tv or going to the movies. People have greater better quality access to reviews of products and services than ever before. There's more scrutiny than ever before, and pretend shape your image to an unknowing public is less effective than ever before.

      Take a look at annoying automated computerized phone systems that transfer you around. That's marketing and tech support trying to pull the wool over management eyes. Take a look at blogs of complaints. That's invaluable *free* feedback, which 6 figure marketing salaries can't compete with. You have mmorpg game companies with paid employees that now r

      --
      "From DNA to P2P, we are all Copycats now. Go Go Copycat Power! Copycat Powers activate! Form of, a Copycat." --monxrtr
  40. The NSA Has Prior Art by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    The NSA, et al, have been doing this sort of tracking and collating for years. Think of it as a lost opportunity: the NSA could have been selling ads all this time!

    (straightening my tinfoil hat)

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  41. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are people able to track you?

  42. Maybe it s a good thing by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    If a single company patents it, it can sue everyone else who uses it into oblivion. Thus raising the advertising rates due to the monopoly, and reducing the number of applications actually using it.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  43. Yeah - no thanks by xgr3gx · · Score: 0

    Oh boy! No I can get ads popping up on my cell phone! Great! I bet they burn my mintues too!
    I don't get enough banners and pop-ups on my PC.
    Quick, who's the first with a tech startup to make a popup blocker for your cell phone?
    You think spyware sucks now...wait until GPS goes into play.
    Oh man. Wheres my type writer and crank operated phone?

    --
    Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
  44. Don't worry... by msimm · · Score: 1

    I use Astral Projection to get most places. Take &*that*# suckers!


    Where's my peyote buttons?

    --
    Quack, quack.
  45. Re:I have two simple, effective words for Pelago.. by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Fuck. You. You left off "In the ass. With a hog de-bunger." In case you're wondering what that is, imagine something that looks like a cross between a jackhammer and and a fence post digger that removes the anus from pig carcasses in meat packing operations. I know someone who did some design work on them early in his career. He keeps a display model around in preparation for when his daughters start dating. You know, something to use as a conversation piece with the boyfriend while she's still getting ready.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  46. s/PFV/TIA/ by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

    There is no difference when the corporations control
    the government. No difference at all.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  47. er.... by msimm · · Score: 1

    And I trust them absolutely not to abuse or misuse this technology. Because they never have in the past...


    I'm sure you'll enjoy your new improved location-specific viagra/trans-sexual/diet-pill/stock tips. Because the greater the volume of targeted data available on you the more responsible advertisers will become. Naturally.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  48. YES, IT IS GOOD !!!!!!! by voraistos · · Score: 0

    And here is why: This kind of "features" are the reason why open-source exists: Instead of being tracked, WE can "discover" the protocol they use, find out about some exploit, and use the nice, open-source, battery-life-friendly, human-rights compliant application we make out of it to localize THEM and boycott their products. Aaahhhh that feels great to tell someone to fuck off.

  49. I'd like to know... by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

    ...why corporate America has more rights to my personal information than I do.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  50. A true case where I don't want ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... to see life imitate art...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  51. their tracking would best serve them by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    so they can track me as I go around and beat the shit out of the assholes responsible for this invasion of my privacy and the spamming of my cell phone.

  52. WOW... by ppiluk · · Score: 1

    Who needs to worry about big brother! We need to be more concerned with the brother who is always bumming change!

  53. Run for the Hills! by JWedg · · Score: 1

    Holy Sh** Batman!

    Do you want ANY entity/company to have access to all the information this system requires?
    Just think, they want to know:
            1 - Your GPS location. From your phone?
            2 - Your physical location (apparently you have an RFID implanted somewhere, and you passed by a reader they put up for this purpose)
            3 - What ads are put on your phone, PDA or computer. (Apparently they know your IP address.)
            4 - ALL your phone calls. To mine whether you called an advertiser.
            5 - ALL your "financial transactions" (read credit card transactions). To mine...
    Yikes! I don't want ANYONE to know all that about me... Do you?

    This is the scariest thing I've read for awhile...
    It is ~almost~ enough to make me get rid of my phone (or remove the GPS ability) and stop using my credit card.
    JWedg

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Run for the Hills! by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but they'll give you a 50 cent instant rebate in exchange... woo hoo sign ME up! /sarcasm

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  54. Re: Can't patent, has prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember working at Qualcomm in the mid-90's and they were planning all this back then. In fact, the entire reason there is GPS in every new cell phone sold in the US is because a group of cell phone manufacturers and service providers lobby Congress to pass a law requiring this! While they sold people on the idea that GPS would help out with 911 calls, the real reason was because they already had detailed specs for geographically targeted advertising systems. In a related bill lobbied for and passed by Congress, cell phone service providers are allowed to share personal and financial information of their customers with third party affiliates. This opens the door to link geographically targeted advertising with the buying habits of the person who owns the phone.

    Back then, the thought was giving customers totally free cell phone service if they agreed to use a phone with GPS enabled at all times and geographically/demographically linked advertising enabled.

    When I saw Minority Report I remember thinking that one of the writers must have some knowledge of cell phone industry plans for the future.

    But, as I feared back then, what seems to be happening is that service providers are expecting you to pay for the privilege of these services.

  55. Opportunities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Does this mean that U.S. cell carriers might get around to ubiquitously adopting WiFi capable cell phones!? (That would allow the malls, public utilities and governments to subsidize data delivery?) Nah, then we wouldn't need Edge network data plans.(Of course AT&T already figured out how to overcome that, just require a data plan for activation of your iPhone.)

    I wonder if the NSA could use this type of service to try out behavior modification ads on Extremist Sleeper Cell members... I can see it now. For each Cell member who turns himself or converts to Christianity, either the NSA agent or the clergy ad-specialist wins a free trip to Haiti's Hedonism III.

    And how long before this system delivers "Issue Ads" to people on their way into the polling place... Ding! - "Remember to vote for Alby Zeinya for Congress; He'll protect you from the Godless Somnambulists!

    -- Waiting for God, Yo! --

  56. Spam+surpervise+sue ? by D4C5CE · · Score: 1

    1. Set up a surveillance society,
    2. Watch everybody all the time,
    3. ???
    4. Profit
    Steps 1 & 2 are already happening whether we want them to or not. Its a done deal.
    [...] patent it too.
    It's no surprise that even lawyers don't like to see any of this happening.
  57. Soon after this by Kirizan · · Score: 1

    Calls of the future...

    Operator: 911 what's your emergency
    Caller: My car just flipped, I'm trapped, I need help I'm at...
    Commercial interrupts call: Need a new car? Try Jordan Ford for all your new car needs.
    Operator: Is anyone injured?
    Caller: Yes, I think I broke my arm
    Another interruption: Remember, Memorial Hospital is your friend, we care about you and
                                                your family. Tell them to take you to Memorial.

    Come on, it's the next logical step, they are going to start sending us text and picture ads, why not just voice over commercials durring a conversation...

  58. PRIOR ART ON SLASHDOT by inKubus · · Score: 1

    See me already have this idea here. (along with other great comments..)

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  59. This is a semantically void message by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    fnord

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  60. Uh.. on the subject of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone that uses the phrase "crazy loosy goosy" ever should be banned from Earth. Or at least banned from commenting on sane things to do.