Slashdot Mirror
What Vista SP1 Means To You
An anonymous reader writes "Geek.com has an interview with Nick White, Microsoft's Vista Product Manager, covering the upcoming release of Vista SP1. The interview goes over some of the new features, how the change will affect admins, and how Microsoft decides if a change should be rolled out as an update or as part of the service pack. One of the most interesting questions asks whether people should feel that they have to wait until SP1 to upgrade to the operating system, a common practice with Windows users. White writes off this practice as no longer being necessary and notes how Windows Update has lessened the importance of the release of a service pack. Just the same, a News.com article explores the possibility that this update will finally begin driving users to Vista."
Vista SP1 means fresh material to pick on Microsoft for. So now, instead of having a year of the same old "Vista sucks and is failing" articles on Slashdot day after day, we'll have fresh new material like "Vista SP1 sucks and is failing."
Didn't I just read in the Slashdot Vista news earlier "The service pack is said to improve performance and stability, not to add features."
I doubt it will "drive" users to vista saying previous service packs managed to drive users to buy iMac's and then MacBooks.
anime+manga together at last.. in real time.
Hmmm -- nope. Nothing.
Lacking <sarcasm> tags,
Unfortunately for Microsoft, Vista SP1 doesn't mean anything to the majority of computer users, and that trend is showing very little sign of changing. People that have been using Windows have been pretty happy with XP and Win2000. Surprising numbers of casual users still have '98. And increasing numbers of us are using something else entirely =)
So, with the service pack you're finally getting a stable product? Where's the value for all the money you're laying out? Pay hundreds of dollars, put up with anal probe product activation and wait almost a year for what you should have gotten in the first place.
I'm sure that makes sense on some planet...just not this one.
That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
Mr. White's assertions aside, IMHO, MS is releasing this service pack as early as possible to entice people into believing Vista is "ready". The practice in the industry to wait for the first few updates is to firmly entrenched for them to simply "write it off".
And in my experience, lest my FOSS bias shine through, the idea of waiting for the first few updates goes for most software, not just Windows or other MS software.
Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
It means there is only one more service pack to go before I might consider thinking about adopting it.
Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
After flirting with Ubuntu on my laptop for about a year, and using Vista at home on my desktop for about 6 months I've had it, and I'll be switching the desktop to Linux as soon as I get some spare time.
From TFA:
"If you're an administrator, then you definitely have a lot more to look forward to when it comes to SP1. One thing that caught my eye was the additional ability in BitLocker to encrypt extra local volumes. Many enterprises still partition their workstations and laptops into a C and D drive. Since users are usually instructed to use the D drive to store their data, this means data was at risk if the enterprise also used BitLocker as a security measure, since D couldn't be previously encrypted."
Wait. Only C: could be locked? Full of fail.
So
I guess we're going to have to re-write the old "it's not a bug, it's a feature".
Meanwhile, we'll be seeing new bugs in the new "functionality" that is not a new "feature".
Maybe a massive bugfix so I can install and use it finally? Or is this just a small patch to an OS going down in history as a Windows ME Second edition
Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
This seems semi-ridiculous.
But I'll say the same thing here that I did last time. Basically, the reason that SP1 isn't as big as deal as a "Service Pack" normally is, is that the two "main" updates that will provide a different end-user experience have already been released.
The main "other" thing that SP1 will offer, which apparently wasn't confirmed by Nick White's post, is Paul Thurrott's statement (echoed by others, but which he has now stepped back from until he can get confirmation) that Vista SP1 will include a kernel update to 6.1. This would be the same kernel that will be in Windows Server 2008.
Wow, I didn't know you could remove bloat with a Service Pack.
I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
Hopefully by the time I'm forced into using Vista, SP1 and the other SP's will be included on the Vista disc.
I'll tell you what it means to me - Windows XP 64-bit. I "upgraded" to Vista early in the summer, and I kept telling myself through all the headaches that I'd just wait it out until SP1. Now that that's not until next year, I've decided I'm no longer waiting. Instead, I'm switching to XP 64-bit, which appears to have a lot more driver support than the last time I tried it. There's no way I'm going to wait until Q1 2008 for a service pack that might fix my issues, especially if, according to Microsoft, service packs are less important now that Windows Update is widely used.
"Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
I get to continue feeling happy about my Fedora box.
it means that we will have a flood of articles about Vista SP1, just like the initial flood of Vista articles. Seeing as there's now 2 articles already inside an hour.... I shudder to think how many we will see until March 2008.. or whenever SP1 comes out.
What can someone be xpected to say about a mere Statement of Intent from Microsoft, about a Service Pack.... which right thinking people would expect a big comapny to release RIGJHT NOW and solve teething troubles faced by Vista users daily?
The schedule for SP1 indicates MS is under zero pressure to deliver anything or do anything innovative. No point fantasizing about it.
If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
Products that start their lives perceived as having a very high suck factor will end their lives with much the same perception. There is little that can be done once a products suck level (read: consumer perception) has been determined.
load "$",8,1
So you are saying that everybody ships unready products. These days everybody have patchs. Some calls it Service Packs, others call it updates, others just patchs, and finally other call it Leopard ;-)
It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
Just like Windows eventually caught up to Mac with Windows95 and then exceeded it with Windows 2000, Microsoft will once again catch up to Mac OS X with an eventual improved version of Vista that looks and feels as good.
When that time comes Apple faithful will rant "Mac's had that for 5 years!" and it won't matter anymore. Apple had better get innovating the next major killer features fast, because Microsoft is always improving.
Seriously,
Vista was supposed to be released in ?
Vista was proclaimed as ready... oops
How many times do people have to be fooled before they realise that the next release from MS will also be a disappointment?
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
On the downside, it's the IT equivalent of working with raw sewage.
We, the raw sewage community, take umbrage with that remark.
The practice of "waiting for the first SP", while perhaps somewhat of a misnomer in most cases, is well founded in the IT world (that deals with MS products anyway), so it's not exactly the dumbest question ever. Granted there are many other reasons not to switch to Vista yet (legacy application compatibility being chief among them), but I promise you there are quite a few IT shops out there who took the attitude of "Well we'll wait until SP1 and see" when it came to the question of moving the infrastructure to Vista.
* A minimum of 7 GB free disk space on the system partition for x86-based operating systems and a minimum of 12 GB free disk space for x64-based operating systems.
They say the drive space will only be used temporarily, and I know drive space is cheap these days. But what about people with laptops that are pushing their hard drives near the limit?
The $500 dual core laptop with Vista home pro pre-installed is the most effective way to spread Vista - and that's exactly what's happening.
It has started a huge shift from desktop computers to laptops, just check out your local stores. I picked up a decent HP dual core, 1 GB memory, 80GB HD, DVD-RW, firewire for my daughter to replace her aging desktop.
Since Vista was pre-installed, everything works, of course. I would not want to switch over to Vista, but since it's included in the $500 laptop price, and it would cost me $160 to get an XP OEM plus my time, there is really no incentive to change it. I don't know how much HP paid for Vista, but with the $500 laptop price it felt like Vista was free.
With this price drop I suspect mass migration to laptops - at least for home users and the spread of Vista.
Personally I feel bad for my sister who will have to use it. I'd recomend she use Ubuntu instead, but she lives in another country and I won't be able to help her, and she doesn't feel prepared to try it on her own. I guess she would probably manage just fine, but sadly she doesn't even want to give it a shot. Oh well...
one step down, 1,000 to go!
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
Sorry, but I just don't buy it. People don't switch to Vista because of:
1) hardware compatibility issues,
2) software compatibility issues, and
3) annoyances such as UAC, which negatively impact hinder the user experience (though, I do understand their utility).
In a corporate setting, the first two are, without question, show stoppers, and the last is a burden for support staff. Further, XP *works* for most people, so there's little reason to switch. A service pack for Vista does nothing to address these issues (nor could it).
...there are quite a few IT shops out there who took the attitude of "Well we'll wait until SP1 and see" when it came to the question of moving the infrastructure to Vista.This is my experience of the attitude of bad IT shops. The ones I respect take the form follows function approach - if there is a compelling functional reason to upgrade then that will be the driver, not some arbitrary line in the sand. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Stupid flounders!
... that Microsoft should spend more money in bug fixing and for faster update release.
None can be perfect, software can always contain bugs. But being dull and dumb with bugs and security holes is deliberate stupidity.
Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
Yeah, we can all rewrite 30 years worth of shell scripts just so we can use one of the most bloated operating systems ever developed.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
You know something's wrong when you're talking about driving people to use software rather than attracting them to it.
DNA just wants to be free...
I used to know a guy on a campus social sciences mailing list that could not discuss Islam or Islamic society without using the term "islamofascist". Every single time. And all his references were to blog entries he had written, most of which were plain wrong or simple misrepresented facts. It gets old after a while, but more importantly it's the equivalent to using "poopyhead" when talking about someone you don't like. It's impossible to have conversations of any sort with people like that.
It's funny that you talk about Microsoft's credibility here, given that your slaughter of intelligent discourse also eliminates most of yours.
I like Slashdot but lately it's becoming more and more like Digg.
Stability and performance are not the same. I never said performance was not an issue, nor did I say stability was unimportant... so I really don't see your point.
And please, enough with your stupid journal already. Its already been picked apart, and even the anti-MS crowd here is starting to see you for the nutjob you are.
Note that I didn't say that SP1 would be the reason for a switch, only that a switch would only be considered after SP1. I would imagine most shops are like mine; when a new OS comes out we look at it, techs like me run it first as test machines then eventually as main machines, and eventually (read: when MS pretty much forces us) we move the campus to it, in the interests of keeping a standard desktop environment. Though actually we are probably going to take an "upgrade by attrition" approach this time around, because of Vista's insane hardware requirements.
Q: Microsoft's biggest competition is...
1) Linux
2) Mac OS X
3) Old MS products
The correct answer is 'C'. I know a company that is *very* Microsoft-centric. Last year they were announcing ambitious plans to move to Vista as soon as possible. Not only are they still on XP, they evidently now have no plans to move to Vista. I guess a cold dose of reality was enough to bring them to their senses.
MS is facing two problems with regard to Vista adoption: 1) Vista mostly sucks* and 2) XP is mostly OK. Either one would be an obstacle. Both together are nearly insurmountable.
In the next 2-3 years, I predict...
- most apps will work OK on Vista
- driver issues will have been worked out
- another service pack or two will shave off all the rough edges--they'll fix that networking/multimedia issue, they'll have better default settings so UAC isn't as annoying, etc.
- OEM hardware with Vista will work pretty well
Basically, they'll get past the current state of Vista having "no redeeming merits to overcome the compatibility headaches it causes." But I really do think that will take 2-3 years, and it'll be interesting to see what MS does in that time. I'm sure Vista will eventually be the dominant OS, but I think it'll take that long--which is too bad, because spam simply will not go away until the bulk of the boxes on the Internet are not insecure Windows systems. (Of course, if Mac OS X or Linux wins, that'll be fine too.) MS really screwed up, though. Once Vista was spiraling out of control, they should have pulled back and did what Apple did with OS X--release a whole new OS with the old OS in a VM. That way they could have had a relatively cruft-free OS with the old crufty stuff contained in a VM, rather than making the single largest collection of cruft ever.
* where "mostly sucks" means "some things that used to work are now broken, and the things that are new and work aren't really that great."
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
No, i would say, it is too late.
They should have added SP1 to the initial release.
Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
Twitter, sometimes you talk sense, sometimes you sound like some kind of fundamentalist nutjob. This post made sense and was informative for people not following up on the last news.
But people would take your posts a lot more seriously if you spelled Microsoft or its shorthand version MS properly. I don't like them myself, but there's no need for infantile name-throwing.
If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
M$ has burnt a lot of what little credibility it had left with Vista. Apologies from editors are not going to do the trick as long as there is real fair and independent review of performance. Windoze users have waited seven years for an upgrade and they can easily afford to wait another to see if Vista has anything that warrents it's cost and restrictions.
Coincidentally, I just sat down and used Windows Vista properly for the first time today. Clean installs, first in Parallels Desktop and then Boot Camp. And I utterly fail to see what it so objectionable about Vista. It's not earth shattering, no, but it's at least better than XP, if not as good as OS X. It's not that much slower than XP was on the same hardware, even with all the Aero stuff enabled. The UAC prompts...I had "one", on installing Apple's Boot Camp drivers (which, on the negative side, crashed the system.)
This is my personal experience only, true, but as far as I'm concerned it's far from the sinking crater that you seem to think it is.
By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
And I like it like that.
At least Vista cut down on the number of complaints about XP.
Windows Vista, making XP look good for 7 months now.
I read this with a twinge of curiosity. Vista Home Ultimate came on the new Dell system I received a couple months ago. While the novelty of Vista's graphical enhancements wore off quickly, my irritation at a litany of Vista bugs did not. They include:
, linux/article.html
- Two year old Netgear 802.11g wireless card being virtually impossible to install
- Crackling, popping audio in World of Warcraft (and other games) from the built in audio that defied repeated attempts to fix via driver upgrades
--- Disabled said audio in BIOS, inserted Creative Sound Blaster 5.1 digital PCI card. Guess what? VISTA INCOMPATIBLE. Creative. THE standard. in.com.patible with Vista's DRM-heavy digital device list. Back to crackling, popping on board audio. So annoying I resorted to playing WoW with no sound.
- ATI HDTv Wonder PCI card installation - wasted time. Windows Media Center could not tune ANYTHING with any degree of quality when the same card + antenna did brilliantly on my old Win XP box. Furthermore, exhaustive forum searching reveals that Media Center actually cripples the driver for the HD tuner, making it so that you can tune OTA content, OR CATV content, but NOT BOTH. You have to install a hacked up driver from some shady 3rd party website to use the full functionality of your TV card. Again, the ATI product does not appear on Microsoft's DRM-heavy "approved digital device" list.
- On board gigabit ethernet adapter's network configuration would randomly disappear and have to be reconfigured when the computer was hard rebooted for any reason, including power outages, or video lockups, leading us to..
- NVidia GForce 7300 PCI Express card included with machine worked flawlessly as delivered, BUT after Microsofts last "patch Tuesday" a few weeks ago, the video would not 'wake up' after the machine had been put to sleep. The "sleep mode" suspend worked great until the last security patch.. It makes no sense to me either. After the patch, the video would not wake with the rest of the system, forcing a hard poweroff/restart, causing the network setting to disappear.. HALF the time.
-
So, two nights ago, after backing up, I took my freshly burned Ubuntu 7.04 cd, took a deep breath, and installed. I can get around in Linux, but I am by no means an expert. My installation was smooth. In less than 90 minutes, using Automatix, I had every plugin, driver, and application I could ever want to make my system perform properly. Nvidia OpenGL driver automatically configured, all video/flash plugins for Firefox, DVD playback, the whole 9 yards. Additionally, using the step-by step copy and paste instructions from the ubuntu website, I had Wine installed, and had configured it properly to run World of Warcraft.
So here I sit. World of Warcraft runs smoothly. Audio is CRYSTAL CLEAR, my Soundblaster Live 5.1 card is supported, no popping, clicking audio. I play the game at 1680x1050 with almost all detail settings turned on at a very smooth framerate. I visit CNN.com and view all embedded video seamlessly, no plugin errors or other irritants. When I need to type papers for college, I have OpenOffice. Ipod works flawlessly with podcast management program.
Why do I need Vista again?
------
Make World of Warcraft work flawlessy in Ubuntu with Wine:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WorldofWarcraft
PC World's noob-friendly "Seven Post-Install Tips for Unbuntu 7.04" :
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130923-page,1-c
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
Looks like Apple's got some innovative plans in the works . . .
Should this come to pass, would we have to re-work the "If Microsoft built a car" jokes?
I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.
two articles in a day about something that doesn't mean anything to anybody with a brain enough to avoid it, just means that slashdot is looking into MS for sponsorship, now that their stock (LNUX) has been downgraded...
Note that my comment wasn't directed at you - why so defensive? ;-)
Seriously though, it was directed at the people on here who give the appearance of genuinely holding the "don't trust a M$ OS until SP1" view. Fortunately I no longer have to support Microsoft systems (having cut my teeth on WFW3.11/NT3.51) and I have to say this attitude regarding SP1 being the first point at which a Microsoft OS magically becomes worth considering because of some long running historical precedent doesn't fit my recollection.
Staying clear of being an early adopter, on the other hand, is nothing new and certainly not Microsoft - or even computing - specific.
Stupid flounders!
Is anyone else getting sick of tags that "answer" the question asked in the subject? It's fine that Vista SP1 means nothing to you...but I really don't need to see it. Can we just ban people that add stupid tags?
Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
Windows XP SP2 is almost a completely different OS than what shipped in a shrink wrapped box in 2001. The article completely glosses over that point, and stresses the virtues of Windows Update. Which, if I recall correctly, existed before XP SP2. So... ?
I'm a 2000 man.
Don't be fooled by his attempt to confuse the issue. Microsoft Windows is EXPENSIVE, in my opinion, and becoming more so. We often have had to re-load Windows XP to remove system instability caused by sloppy coding and by system files modified by malware.
It has been more than 2 years since WinXP service pack 2 was released (August 25, 2004), even though updating Windows XP from an SP2 CD requires downloading more than 170 Megabytes of files, a difficult problem when there is no internet connection or only a dial-up connection. The Windows XP updates of just last Patch Tuesday were more than 20 Megabytes.
Microsoft seems to have delayed releasing an SP3 for Windows XP to try to discourage people from using their XP operating system. But the really major problems in Windows XP stopped only after the SP2 was released.
We have had eight different kinds of problems with Microsoft update; Microsoft Update gets my vote for the buggiest Microsoft software, and that's a tough title to get. Other people have many, many different kinds of problems with Windows Update. See, for example, Windows Update Discussion Group.
I'm guessing that tens or hundreds of millions of hours and billions of dollars are lost every year because of the sloppy coding in Windows XP. Steve Ballmer took Bill Gates' position as the Chief of Grief.
Corporate Rule: Never use a new version of Windows until after the 2nd service pack has been released, and others have had a chance to see if there are problems. It is expensive in re-training costs to use a different operating system, so a company that has a virtual monopoly can abuse the customer by releasing unfinished and sloppy software, and still not lose most of its customers.
Remember that the cost of Windows is much more than the cost of the OS itself for many reasons besides the high maintenance costs. Microsoft's biggest customers are the giant computer manufacturers, and they want to manipulate people to buy new computers. So, each new version of Microsoft Windows requires more powerful hardware. Those who use Windows are dragged through the adversarial business schemes of one of the most anti-customer large corporations in the world, in my opinion.
Microsoft Windows maintenance is so expensive that people throw away their computers and buy new ones because the maintenance cost is so high. See, for example, the New York Times article, Corrupted PC's Find New Home in the Dumpster. (Free NYT registration required.)
Many people depend for making a living on maintaining Microsoft Windows. Many of those people have no other way of making a living. They often try to confuse discussions of the maintenance costs of Windows and discussions of Microsoft's adversarial practices; don't be fooled by their misdirection.
I have very very good luck with Windows - I grew up using MS-DOS and kind of kept up to date as things rolled out so I know enough ins and outs to keep it running well.
Generally my installations are conflict-free, fast, stable (OS crashing... doesn't happen. Period. The odd app dies time to time.) no viruses, no exploits, etc... I had a trojan about ten years ago but that was the last one.
Then again, I almost never install Windows before the first service pack. Win95 OSR1 was ok, OSR2 was so fast and stable for me. Win98 was a pig, then Win98 SE was a well-dressed pig (haha...) and by the end I didn't really want to get rid of it since I had it working... PRETTY well. NT, 2k... never used at home. WinXP/2003 have been amazing for me; I started at XP SP1, but 2003 was the original release. I never thought I'd see Windows run rock-solid for years, but here it is. I guess others aren't always so lucky but at work we have thousands of WinXP SP2 installations that work great.
Will Windows Update lessen the need for major service packs? Did it in Win98? Did it in ME? Did it in XP? Not really... why should it be any different for Vista? I'll probably move to Vista eventually, but I don't think SP1 will even be enough - it sounds like there are a lot of dealbreakers in it and clearly I'm on the pro-Windows side of things. Also there isn't much incentive to move right now. The only thing I really want out of XP right now is better multiprocessor support. The security does suck, but I find running from behind a firewall/router with a bit of common sense in daily operation keeps it well safe enough.
Vista is a nice set of ideas, but I think they need to just bite the bullet and "BeOS it," drop backwards compatibility ONCE, and rewrite from scratch for modern systems. Do it like MacOS X and include an older legacy supporting version with it. It's not a smooth migration, but the disruption would be worth having everything done right - assuming they actually do it right. Multiprocessor support to at least 64 CPUs. Throw away everything to do with networking. Burn it. Do it from square one. They have the money. They have more than capable coders. They might even have business systems analysts who understand how to manage it (MIGHT!) Then choosing the best OS wouldn't be so much about the lesser of the evils. (Don't start about Linux... It's fine in the right cases, but I don't have any use or time for the dozen distros/versions I've run over the last 10 years. I'll keep checking in periodically but it's just not a practical solution for me or any company I've worked for.)
I agree. I happened to buy a computer the first week Vista came out. I honestly didn't even realize it had come out. My old computer went bad and I needed a new one fast. I honestly can't see where all the gripes are. I leave it on all the time. It never crashes on me. It's only rebooted a couple of times because of certain updates it's gotten that required it (I know I know, why should an update require a reboot blah blah blah). It's really run like a dream. I don't have particularly fast hardware. It wasn't an expensive computer. I got it for $750 at Staples. I've never noticed a slow down because of aero. I run as a standard user and not as admin and the only time I get prompted for UAC is when I install something or I make system changes which is as it should be. (I had an issue with an HP program that assumed running as admin to check for updated drivers every day. Luckily that program was finally updated and so is no longer an issue.)
I mean honestly, what is the big problem? I keep reading articles and comments talking about how crappy Vista is and I just shake my head and say I don't get it. I don't know. I guess prejudices are hard to give up.
www.joshferguson.org
CORRECTION: I should have said, "It has been more than 3 years since WinXP service pack 2 was released..."
Let me know nine months from now if Vista can actually do anything for you that XP, Mac or gnu/linux could not do faster
My mother-in-law is a very unknowledgeable user. I bought her a computer a week after I bought mine and I set it up with Vista (came with XP but Vista had just been released so I got a free upgrade). My mother-in-law's biggest problem has always been her kids coming home to visit and downloading or installing crap. It's always been a challenge to lock her XP down. With Vista it's a piece of cake. She runs as a standard user and since she isn't a power user, she rarely has to be bothered by UAC. When she is, it's no big deal to enter the admin password. Now when I go to visit I don't have to spend hours cleaning off viruses and spyware. It all just works. She's never had an issue and I never have to fix something using the VNC server I installed on it like I used to with her XP.
As for faster, it really doesn't have a speed problem. I've never noticed any speed issue and that's with Aero running. It's an HP that I paid $650 for and it included a monitor. Not exactly high-end hardware.
www.joshferguson.org
Nobody, not even utter fanboys, thought that pre-SP Vista would be worthwhile. MS know they have to release an SP to make people interested. It gives them a way to wipe the slate clean.
Engineering is the art of compromise.
You don't happen to have some kind of zoning on your router, only allowing WAN/Internet traffic for unknown MACs? (Just asking because I hit something similar when visiting a friend with my XP laptop, and I was baffled on why I could connect to external sites, but not locally. It turned out to be a config issue on the router.)
Not a god-damned thing.
I had such a miserable experience running Vista for two weeks (on a fairly ballsy PC - AMD Athlon fx 4000 w/ 4 gb RAM, gamer-quality video card, etc.). Sorry, but you'd have to point a gun to my head to get me to do that again.
This was the last Windows PC in my otherwise all-Mac house. Tomorrow I'm replacing it with a new Mac Mini Core2Duo. Probably just redeploy the PC as a home network server.
If you love Vista, great, I'm not trying to piss on your parade. I will admit the Aero interface is very pretty. Hardly makes up for random blue-screen/reboots several times a day. Yes, this was a fresh install, not an upgrade version.
This is just one man's experience......
sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
Security improvements that will be in Windows Vista SP1 include:
* Provides security software vendors a more secure way to communicate with Windows Security Center.
* Includes application programming interfaces (APIs) by which third-party security and malicious software detection applications can work with kernel patch protection on x64 versions of Windows Vista. These APIs help ISVs develop software that extends the functionality of the Windows kernel on x64 computers without disabling or weakening the protection offered by kernel patch protection.
* Improves the security of running RemoteApp programs and desktops by allowing Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) files to be signed. Customers can differentiate user experiences based on publisher identity.
* Adds an Elliptical Curve Cryptography (ECC) pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) to the list of available PRNGs in Windows Vista.
* Enhances BitLocker Drive Encryption (BDE) to offer an additional multifactor authentication method that combines a key protected by the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) with a Startup key stored on a USB storage device and a user-generated personal identification number (PIN).
Reliability
Windows Vista SP1 will include improvements that target some of the most common causes of crashes and hangs, giving users a more consistent experience. Many of these improvements will specifically address issues identified from the Windows Error Reporting tool. The following list describes some of the reliability improvements that Windows Vista SP1 will include:
* Improved reliability and compatibility of Windows Vista when used with newer graphics cards in several specific scenarios and configurations.
* Improved reliability when working with external displays on a laptop.
* Improved Windows Vista reliability in networking configuration scenarios.
* Improved reliability of systems that were upgraded from Windows XP to Windows Vista.
* Increased compatibility with many printer drivers.
* Increased reliability and performance of Windows Vista when entering sleep and resuming from sleep.
Performance
The following list describes some of the performance improvements that Windows Vista SP1 will include:
* Improves the speed of copying and extracting files.
* Improves the time to become active from Hibernate and Resume modes.
* Improves the performance of domain-joined PCs when operating off the domain; in the current release version of Windows Vista, users would experience long delays when opening the File dialog box.
* Improves performance of Windows® Internet Explorer® 7 in Windows Vista, reducing CPU utilization and speeding JavaScript parsing.
* Improves battery life by reducing CPU utilization by not redrawing the screen as frequently, on certain computers.
* Improves the logon experience by removing the occasional 10-second delay between pressing CTRL-ALT-DEL and the password prompt displaying.
* Addresses an issue in the current version of Windows Vista that makes browsing network file shares consume significant bandwidth and not perform as fast as expected.
Nope, unfortunately. I've also disabled the auto-window-size-thingy that Vista thinks is a cool idea. And even with antivirus/firewall removed/disabled, no joy. I can ping the devices just fine, but connecting is a no-go. Works fine with WinXP, Linux and OS/X. Vista just doesn't want to ;)
I think if you put XP on that same computer, you'd be surprised at how much faster it is on identical hardware.
I'm not going to install Vista SP1 unless they make sure to add the feature of not totally sucking. Even then, Gutsy is just so pretty, I doubt I will bother.
I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
XP user at work
Linux user at home
Vista user at home
Never had an issue with vista since I installed it right when it was first released. Runs well on my old Dell Domension 8300 box. Not crashed. Not slow when copying lots of files. I use it to serve all my MP3 (>250 Megs) throughout my house. I run NTI Shadow 3 in the background to backup My Docs, photos and music to my LACIE network drive. I run McAfee in the background and a bunch of other stuff. I'm not a tech-boy, I installed it myself and I use it for general home use. Honestly, I'm not seeing where the big issue is. It does it's job and that's all I ask it to do.
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
OSX might be an obvious choice for some people, and there are a lot of things I like about it, but it's too bad that Apple just doesn't want me as a customer. I'd definitely consider switching at least a few of my computers to OSX if it was possible to install it easily on systems I made myself. Until I can do this I'll just have to stick with operating systems made by companies who actually want my business (Canonical and MS).
If OSX wasn't locked to proprietary and overpriced hardware with limited options it'd be the obvious choice for me to. Maybe apple will change one day, but I don't expect that. I actually like Vista, and Ubuntu is getting better and better very fast.
If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
Actually, there's one key difference. This story is unfinished. There are two endings. One includes the phrase "malware and viruses" and the other doesn't. I'll let you wait for the virus/spyware world to catch up with Vista before you realise yours is the story with the bad ending. Then again, you can rewrite this story in a few years subbing Vista for XP, so bookmark this page and in a few years, when you come back to it, remember to thank me for saving you the effort to have to rewrite it.
Free Software games list and commentary
Just because Vista is stable for you, doesn't mean it is for everybody. I know plenty of people - including myself - who had bad initial experiences with Vista. Sure, it's shiney, but that's as good as it got for me. I dunno, maybe trying to unzip an eclipse download isn't something an OS like Vista should have to handle... :rolleyes:
Free Software games list and commentary
- saving a wireless connection with no SSID;
- hibernating;
- coming back from hibernation;
- re-establishing a wireless connection AFTER coming back from hibernation (assuming you managed to get that far);
- checking your battery consumption
- ???
and then tell me there's nothing to complain about.They can drive me there, but they can't make me get out of the car. I'll stick with Mac OS X and Kubuntu for my day-to-day needs, and XP and its more reasonable license agreement for the stuff I need to do in Windows.
Are you ready for that mouse driver to _maybe_ stop crashing your system?
Yeah, we thought so. Well, tough luck, pointdexter.
brian botkiller "Condensing fact from the vapor of nuance" - Neal Stephenson, Snow Crash
To speak of Vista's "failure" in the marketplace is desperately premature, if not inane.
A new OS or fork that fails to gain more than 4% of the user base in 9 months could only be considered a success in Redmond. We have already been through a Christmas and back to school sale. Why should next year be any different? M$ still thinks xbox and zune are competitive, so what do I know?
If you want to talk about desperate, think about M$'s position. Release a brand new OS and a brand new Office suit and then see no difference to your bottom line. See banks, airlines, hardware stores and others deploy rival software, "where it counts". See vendors sell the same rival software. Their software is buggy because they opted for the great content lockdown instead of taking care of things that mattered.
DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
Runs on Linux and Windows, and doesn't need a TPM chip to operate. It'll create encrypted volumes from files, or work with raw devices, and also do "hidden volumes" in case you need plausible deniability - http://www.truecrypt.org/
Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
Another problem is this; all the atlernatives have terrible power management; for example, I tried Fedora 7, SLED 10 SP1, Solaris Express B70 (upgraded to B71) and all of them fail misserably to actually manage my power and enable me to use my computer off battery for longer than 1 hour.
This is not a troll, I'd love to see more competition but I (along with others) aren't going to bend over backwards and sacrifice functionality for the sake of 'sticking it to the man'.
From the comments I would propose that the traditional linux stronghold has been lost. Anyone making negative references to Microsoft products seems to be modded down and 'out yelled', whether the comments are on technical merits, anecdotal or opinionated, or derogatory.
Of course derogatory for its own sake should be modded down. Technical conversations should be directly rebuffed unless they are obvious lies (it goes both ways Twitter...). Anecdotal; ymmv. Opinionated should be reasoned with technical basis in a civil manner. Unfortunately civility is a dying characteristic [that is an unsubstantiated opinion modders] in the world in general following chivalry.
Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
I mean honestly, what is the big problem? I keep reading articles and comments talking about how crappy Vista is and I just shake my head and say I don't get it. I don't know. I guess prejudices are hard to give up.
It isn't just prejudice, but it does depend on how you use your machine.
For example, it seems gamers are generally not Vista fans. There has been a history of abysmal performance, unreliable graphics drivers, networking/sound problems, and the like. Every major gaming review site I've checked in recent months has some tale of woe or other, and unlike the average moan on Slashdot, these are typically backed by hard data showing XP to be a more stable and/or better-performing platform. Even the DirectX 10 hype has mostly been debunked at this point — for example by getting "Vista-only" games to run just fine on XP.
Laptop users seem to be another group with more than their fair share of grudges against Vista. That's a sizeable chunk of the business world who are upset.
Then there's the home entertainment crowd, who take offence at all the artificial, DRM-related limitations imposed by Vista's futile attempts to "secure" content.
And of course, the final kicker for geeks running Windows is... Well, what does Vista actually do that XP doesn't? (Or, for that matter, that a recent release of OS X or a modern Linux distro doesn't, if you're buying or building new kit and not tied to Windows?) There are plenty of technical concerns, and not a few ethical/trust ones, that argue against getting Vista, so what have Microsoft got that's more important? And the answer, from what I've seen so far myself and reading numerous comments and reviews by others, is pretty much nothing.
If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
Ick! XP is ugly and feels slow compared to Vista. There are so many little things you pick up, like there is finally an easy way to see the full path to running processes, once you try to support people using XP you just get frustrated! Vista is a huge improvement over XP.
That doesn't mean there aren't bugs. Their new TCP/IP stack has all kinds of bugs. There is a bug (and I'm too lazy to find the KB on it) that fucks up how it sends ACK's to other devices. As it turns out, it will hang the MediaMVP in my bedroom. Some vendors software gets buggy too - Vista changed a lot of the API for explorer (the file one, dammit!) that seems to crash TortiseSVN every now and then (though explorer.exe is the one that does the crashing...)
Given a little more time to mature, I suspect many people will look at this like XP vs 3.1. They really just look and act that much different.
I cannot wait to get Vista on my folks computer. My mother seems to trash their computer all the time. However, she'll aways call me whenever XP gives a "Are you sure, Dave?" message. With UAC, she'll be calling me every time she tries to install yet another DVD duplicator or some weird ass media player.
I'm confused though. She just went to target and bought "Super Deluxe Pimpomediaplayer 2000" and it won't install. You mean, it wont run? Cory, this computer is messed up, can you come all the way over here and fix it sometime this week?
No thanks.
PS: Copilot.com is your friend. Saved me many trips fixing ye old parents computer.
Do you have a link or reference to any DirectX 10 game running on Windows XP? So far the "Vista Only" games that have been modified to work on XP have been using DirectX 9.0l, which isn't exactly all that much different from 9.0c as I understand it? I've seen it argued a lot that DirectX 10 has no significant changes that render it unusable on XP, but they're usually using Halo2 as the reference point and that's a 9.0l game.
I'm just starting my second week with Vista 64 Business and while it's nice, very clean and impressive, the fact that: .wmv files
a.) I can't run Windows Update and
b.) Can't view
are both downright frightening.
I am working with MS Tech Support (email variety) on the Windows Update. The two day lag since the last communication is less than heartening.
The first few days, the little annoyances were not enough to stop me from strongly considering Ultimate.
Right now, I'm looking at those sexy iMacs and remembering when I was swearing that I would never invest in roll-your-own-hardware because of the lack of Linux driver support (*glares at ATI*) and how flaky Microsoft products are.
I've had 5 hard crashes today alone. Yeah, maybe there's an update out there BUT I CAN'T GET AT IT!
I want it to work. I really do. But come on.
The opposite of progress is congress
That doesn't explain why anyone would bother changing the user agent to return IE 7 for Vista rather than a generic IE7 or IE6 for XP.
How many people do you suppose know what a "user agent string" is or how to modify it safely?
Most people hate and fear command lines and configuration files because they are afraid some obscure typographical error will lock up their system.
That is why "IE Tab" becomes a popular extension in Firefox.
Or just try to use any version of Ciscos vpn software. Apparently the 5.0 version works *sometimes* and only on fresh installs of vista. I tried to verify it working on a fresh install of vista in a vm and it couldn't hold the vpn up for more than a few minutes at time. Back to XP I went...
Is one of those new features - like - not bluescreening every time I add a new device?
---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
Nothing. Only one computer runs XP for 1 Windiz hardware. That hardware will not mutate to require Vista, so Vista has no meaning to me. Kubuntu & Suse for all other computer needs.
Yes, anyone who dares suggest that Vista is not the existencial nightmare you claim it is is a liar.
Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
...in the entire world that is happy with my move to Windows Vista?
Sure, there were some annoyances early on (all video card related), but these issues have all gone away. Once AMD released mature video drivers for my x1950pro, my machine has been running the way I expect it to (with no issues).
Microsoft deserves a lot of the things people say about them, but I can't believe the number of people who don't have any real experience with Vista that chime in saying "ha, ha, Vista is crap."
Admittedely I was nervous about going to Vista when I did (March of this year), but I was building a new computer at the time, and figured I may as well try it out. I could always go back to XP if Vista really was as bad as people were claiming.
White writes off this practice as no longer being necessary and notes how Windows Update has lessened the importance of the release of a service pack
.NET 1.1. To get a stable .NET install, you need to first install .NET 1.1. Then you need to install 1.1.SP1, because there is no installer with SP1 slipstremed in. Then you have to install two seperate hotfixes. I'm sorry I don't have the KB numbers. That's FOUR installers (if you're using Windows update, 2 reboots) to get you up to the latest version.
I, for one, cannot stand Microsoft's ignorance when it comes to rollups and Service Packs. Windows XP, slipstremed with Service Pack 2, still requires 80+ patches and at least 2 reboots to finish patching. At one point it looked like Microsoft was going to be releasing more rollups, which means less actual patches to apply. The "Internet Explorer Cumulative Security Patch" is a step in the right direction. At least you can be reasonably assured that if you patch yourself with said patch, IE is relatively up to date.
One package that's been pissing me off lately is
Message to Microsoft: we WANT rollups and service packs!!! Windows Update is a pain in the ass!!!!!
If nothing else, I'd like to see a method of downloading all patches since SP2 into a single installer, so I could easily build an offline installer kit. Install XP with SP2 slipstremed, install the patch kit, done without a network connection (and saving HOURS of patch downloading time).
Vista does not activate file sharing and discovery unless you say so. You are supposed to declare the network as a "home" network, where these things are permitted, by opposition to a public network like a Starbucks coffee shop, where you probably don't want file sharing turned on. Then, you are supposed to actually enable file sharing, etc. All that is done from the "network and sharing center", available by clicking on the "network" icon in the tray panel.
Perhaps to make you happy M$ should sue the crap out of every charitable Multiple Sclerosis Society around the world so that M$ can take over the MS logo.
Back to support pack 1 for vista getting people to willingly swap from stale piss to vista, perhaps vista support pack one is just stale piss(see I'm avoiding abbreviations) with the (FU)DRM removed and rebranded ;).
People will only take M$'s post as seriously or more specifically as genuinely as M$ does about marketing the quality of the products it produces, or marketing about hiding product failures, or marketing about denying product faults, or marketing about products sales and those products being 'Sold Out' or, etc. etc. in fact it would be easier just to write M$=B$ and everybody knows what it means.
So M$ is mocked and treated with contempt because that is the way that M$ treats their competitors and their customers.
Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
I, for one, welcome our new SP1 overloards. (Not really, but it will generate a whole shitload of billable hours).
I've been doing slashdot since like 97 - right around senior year in high school. Back then I would have been a good little member of the cult of RMS, I would have been all "fuck the man" for software patents, I pirated software like hell (even had a really good warez server when comcast was beta testing cable modems) and I had gigs of mp3's.
If I'm anything like other people on Slashdot, I'm now older and wiser. I am about to plunk down $1,600 on Photoshop/Dreamweaver. I bought and paid for all the software on all my computers including Visual Studio, Quickbooks and Office Pro. I own two Vista boxes, one XP box and a Mac laptop. I've got half a rack of linux gear in the Westin building, but I've grown too old to pull my hair out with it's stability and I'm moving the farm to FreeBSD. I cannot wait until my business grows to the size then I have to plunk down cash for a wicked cool "big iron" system.
I've been through Slashdot and got bored. I went to kuro5hin before it died. I trolled with the best on adequacy before it died. I tried digg until it turned into youtube without video. It has been 10 years and despite everything, slashdot is still here going strong. As much as people diss slashdot, it is the only website of it's type that is still around. It may have new ajax tricks, but it is still the same as it was in 1997.
So has the traditional Linux stronghold been lost, or has the general slashdot population just grown up, got jobs and now see linux for what it is? A tool just like any other tool. And that is okay.
What's so annoying in UAC? I haven't seen it for about three months now. I know it's lurking somewhere in my Vista since it asked me some admin password when I was doing admin stuff but now when I've installed every software I need I haven't seen it for a while. "Out of sight, out of mind" doesn't work these days?
You don't know what you don't know.
I heard that Vista SP1 was really just upgrading Vista users to a non-server version Win2008. Does this mean that the OS version number is changing to 6.1?
I wish Microsoft had made XP SP2 upgrade everyone to Win2003 (NT 5.2).
"Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
By rounding you managed to gloss over an interesting piece of data: OS X has increased from 2.8 ( Jan '05) to 4.0 (July '07) and Linux has increased from 2.7 (Jan '05) to 3.4 (July '07). This is a subtle change, to be sure, but nonetheless interesting.
Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
That's Huey Lewis and the News, Phil Collins and Whitney Huston...all the music anyone would ever need
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
Bill! you made it to /. again?
Dude, Dudette, whatever you are... there is no way it is possible for Vista to run faster on the same harder as XP. totally, completely impossible. it uses too great a percentage of the systems resources.
The ONLY way it is going to be possible is to pull a win2k / XP trick, and get intel or AMD to release a CPU that is not completely compatible with Win2k/WinXP while releasing a Vista patch to make Vista compatible
This worked great last time; the 64-bit CPU's came out, and MS used Win2k to develop the 64-bit patch...then refused to release it on win2k, only making a 64-bit version of XP possible.
And, of course, all the games that say they won't install on Win2k, only XP or Vista. of course every single one of those games has been patched to run, and run better, on win2k.
if your post was intended as Sarcasm, forgive me; I've been awake too long.
Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
A sure sign of any well balanced, fair and unbiased comment are when all citations 'backing it up' are links to the poster's blog.
The 64 bit version of Server2003 was pretty good even in beta. Why use a home computer opertating system like XP when you can't even get better driver support than 2003?
The best way to accelerate a windows server is by 9.81 m/s2
7. Profit!!!!
My grandmother used anecdotal evidence all the time, and she lived to be 120 years old.
All right Mr Bateman, please drop this axe you have here...
have you any idea how much damage this bulldozer would suffer if I just let it roll right over you?
If what the AC said was obviously correct, it was a waste of time, as it was already obvious. Only stuff that are correct, but not obvious, is worth taking notice of.
Picking on people for using name calling is both immature, and a clear sign that the speaker has no real counter-arguments.
Name calling is imply a way to show lack of respect. It is obvious that the previous speaker had no respect for MS Windows, so calling it Windoze was entirely appropriate in that context.
Nothing I will keep using my Slackware 12.0 :]
and What does it mean to you Sir?
Read and Comment at my BLOG
!!!
It means more painful calls at the Help Desk at the campus I work on.... on an OS we don't yet support... which means more headaches. Thanks M$ for forcing so many college students into buying a crappy done OS before the market was ready to handle it.
Give me a productive error over a boring, mundane and unproductive fact any day. ~Anon
So you mean, Vista is now about as good in respect to this as OS X 10.1? Parental controls in OSX, set up quichly and easily. Plus, no known visrusses so far (in contrast to Vista) and no Internet Explorer installed, that could infect your machine.
Security is one of those properties that either exists or not. Saying that something is "more secure" is saying something like "being a little pregnant"!!! you either have security and nobody can break in or you don't.
SP2 is on its way!!! (hurrah! I never dared to use a brand-new Microsoft product without at least SP2 out).
What? You're kidding, aren't you?
Annoyances such as UAC can be dealt with now, and any half competent support staffer already would have.
Software compatibilities CAN be dealt with via updates, such as a service pack, and have many times in the past. This is one of the dumbest comments I've read on Slashdot from someone who can spell.
Hardware compatibility issues on the other hand, take time. Drivers and support will come, eventually.
One out of three. But keep trying.
1) hardware compatibility issues,
this can work the other way too, getting XP to work properly on a laptop that only ships with vista drivers can be rather difficult.
note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
1) hardware compatibility issues,
2) software compatibility issues, and
3) annoyances such as UAC, which negatively impact hinder the user experience (though, I do understand their utility). 4. Abysmal performance when copying files to/from network shares.
5. CPU-hogging audio-subsystem
This means: At least 1 more year until SP2 comes out, only then Vista can be comsidered "released" ! Before that it's a "public beta version" The whole Internet is going to slow down as terrabytes of SP1 clog up the internet.
I can't connect to http/ftp/ssh locally. I've activated file sharing and discovery, the local network is "private". Doesn't help. ;)
I'm not sure if that should be a metric. I installed it on XP and I could no longer browse the web ever. I had to rebuild the machine to fix it. Here where I work notbody uses Cisco VPN except in a virtual machine.
www.joshferguson.org
Though, XP SP1 was a positive change. I remember back when everyone was swearing by 2000 and wouldn't switch to XP...until SP1.
So we can always be optimistic and hope for the best...o.O
Maybe the increase in popularity will cause more drivers and more applications being written for it.
~Jarik
someone named plague, claims Vista is "stable" and blithers
I guess if you don't have any real point you resort to name calling.
Without stability you don't get performance of anykind. The fact remains that adding Vista to any computer is both a performance and stability hit with little to justify it.
Which is your opinion only. Of course when someone that actually DOES tell you they are running Vista just fine, you dismiss it. Yet YOU don't run Vista, and think google hits are meaningful research.
I'm happy for you if Vista does anything right and is worth your use, but really I think you are a liar. More reliable people than you have thrown in the towel on Vista.
You consider them reliable because they agree with your viewpoint. I personally don't care if some editor at PC world has problems; he may, I never said there were no problems with Vista, just that those people are likely a minority.
If you don't like it, don't click through. Stick your head in the sand while Steve and Bill throw chairs. I like my little list and there's something new to add to it almost every day.
That's rich. I don't need to make up shill accounts and link to my journal to try and give myself credibility. Seems like you're the one with you head in the sand. I've seen your journal once.
I bet it kills you that Vista will soon have more marketshare than Linux. Get a life already.
Well sure, but who would do that? :) In a corporate setting, you're far more likely to see either 1) businesses demanding XP preloaded on new hardware they purchase (we're already seeing companies like Dell backing away from their plans to remove XP from their preload options), or 2) a very gradual migration to Vista as hardware is cycled.
How 'bout I/O prioritization? How 'bout the fact that application views render independently, increasing the apparent responsiveness of switching between applications? How 'bout the fact that the explorer no longer hangs when the system is busy? Vista feels like a major improvement in application and explorer responsiveness, which makes a really big difference.
Thank you so much for the copilot link, I often try to help my gf who lives about 10000km away. :D
this will hopefully help a LOT
This is the sig that says NI (again)
I'd like to introduce you to this wonderful concept called context. If I'm on a health or charity site, I expect MS to refer to Multiple Sclerosis. If I'm on Slashdot or anywhere else talking computers, I expect MS to refer to Microsoft. Do you get confused too when people start talking about Java classes and think they're writing instructional material about an island in Indonesia?
I don't think you are right. I bought a nice crap of the line dual core HP laptop with Vista Core 550$ added 50$ ram to bring it to 1.5 gigs. Hibernate as well as wifi work wonderfully. Standby is nice. I didn't used to have it so when I close the lid my laptop goes into standby. It is so fast now that I left it that way. Hibernation works alright but it seems to take a MUCH longer time to go into Hibernation. Coming out of hibernation is extremely quick though.
I thought I would hate Vista but it is alright when using the included programs. However a lot of my favorite programs like nero as well as many nice little things I run don't work right. Unless... you buy the upgrade. Same story as with XP but I really liked that upgrade and had no gripes with it whatsoever. I wasn't excited about XP but I loved it after I tried it out. Not really the same with Vista.
Vista is Ok for people who don't game. Maybe your error was in not buying a HP.... If you game like me the performance hit for Vista is wayy to much for me to deal with. There aren't any real great reasons to upgrade to vista you can already skin XP and get Yahoo widgets for free!
What moron modded the troll interesting?
Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat
I saw it happen at the university of manchester recently (where they really don't want vista to be used at the momemnt due to compatibility issues with various internal stuff). The machine in question was a sony vaio and the person doing the build eventually got everything except the modem and the fingerprint scanner to work under XP but he was struggling with it for quite some time (and this person was not a newbie he does machine builds all the time).
;) ). Unfortunately people sometimes forget to check hardware compatibility first ;).
At the university they have a site upgrade/downgrade license so normal practice is to buy the machine with the cheapest windows version the OEM offers and then install XP pro on it (images are used where a lot of identical machines are bought but often academics have thier own ideas about what machines they want
note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
That's a common problem with fundamentalist nutjobs.
I am sorry, I couldn't read your whole comment. I was stuck looking for reason C on the quiz part.
On a serious point, I did read the whole thing and agree.
its impossible to get any kind of useful discussion about windows products when all you guys can do is post "it dont work right, it sucks!"
first of all, more than half of you i know from experience have no clue at all what you're talking about, you don't know anything about the OS beyond what you see on your screen, read some review on CNET or something, and it dosen't recognize your scanner or something so it 'sucks'
if you have nothing actually ABOUT the topic to contribute other than that you are an idiot who bought vista and dosen't like it, maybe you should just SHUT UP.
also, if you're working in IT and all you can say is 'vista sucks' that basically tells me that you're an IT guy who really dosen't know his job very well (like 80% of them), and gets frustrated very easily dealing with these complex devices we call 'computers'.
>Given a little more time to mature, I suspect many people will look at this like XP vs 3.1. They really just look and act that much different.
Or they will look at it like ME vs 98 - they really just look and act that much different. But one sucks so much more...
Dungeon Tactics : Free Open Source SRPG
Means that I finally CAN THINK of using it in a VMWare container....
What's stopping you using a modern GNU/Linux distro (assuming hardware support)?
It just gets me because a lot of people will tell you that GNU/Linux is great if you don't intend to play the latest games on it (ie, the ones that don't work in wine), but if you just want to browse the web, listen to music, chat to friends, edit images, whatever else you can do with the tons of Free Software available, then its great as long as your hardware is well supported.
Also it means you lose all the overhead from vista, and you get improved security without the Treacherous Computing and DRM rubbish.
"sudo rm -rf your-face"
I hope you come back to read my response, that's one of the reasons I signed up - I'd get e-mailed about responses.
:)
Anyway I don't judge people for simply posting anonymously. There are many that do so for privacy concerns (don't want to register - that's fine), some for the reasons you stated (I considered them myself before signing up - I may have decided wrongly).
Now while most of this discussion has been about this post by the AC, please note that it started with my pointing out the invalidity (and irony) of an AC specifically calling someone else's credibility into question without presenting any rebuttal to his post or relevant subject matter.
Now I'm not calling your review of Twitter's behavior into question, just stating I haven't seen it with my own two eyes yet. If it's possible he's changed since the events you're recalling he deserves a 2nd chance from those he hasn't wronged yet (like me). If he hasn't changed, I'll see it myself eventually.
I appreciate your taking time to respond - it did occur to me that a few of the actual valid AC crowd would misconstrue what I was saying. This gave me a chance to (attempt to) clear that up - I don't mind ACs, I mind when people use AC posting to start a one-sided flame war. Look forward to your posting again, though I'm bummed I won't know who you are.
Uh... guys? I don't think he was kidding.
Here's a hint for you is it Micro Soft or is it Microsoft, if your arguing meaningless try Mcdonalds, /. is a lot more than just computers and M$, and you didn't even try for M$=B$.
Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
First, some news: osdn.com is down.
And some on-topic comment: Vista SP1 means nothing to me because there's no way it can pass validation with the enterprise customers who might ask me to deploy it. Every member of my family that eager to install Vista has already had me roll it back.
And now back to our regularly scheduled flamewar:
It just has to be done carefully, pointed toward obvious flaws and with good humor. I will agree that the Microsoft fanbois seem to have mod points these days -- I'm getting clearly biased downmods all the time. They're still not beating the upmods, though, so I'm winding up with mods like the ones to this post:
I wind up with five votes up, one down. I loose a karma point because funny doesn't count, but usually someone will choose "interesting" to work around this. I get to feel good because the people who liked it enough to burn a mod point outnumbered the people who diliked it that much (and fanbois with modpoints) by a margin of five to one.
In all, I would say the system is working for me but not for twitter. Twitter's an easy target, and twitter posts a lot.
YMMV.
Help stamp out iliturcy.
As for the rest of it, you are correct that Microsoft is one word, not two, but do you argue that America Online should be abbreviated AO or do you accept general usage there? Hell there's not even a dollar sign in Microsoft; at least there is an 's' beginning a syllable. Again, your statement is correct that Slashdot is more than just computers and Microsoft, however a quick Google search of the site turns up a grand total of one story ever regarding Multiple Sclerosis (two if we count the RIAA suing a lady who happens to have the disease) while there are three Microsoft stories on the front page alone. Regarding "M$=B$," I have no lost love for Microsoft either, but I prefer not to descend to that level. The fact that Microsoft plays dirty doesn't mean that everyone else has to as well.