Slashdot Mirror


2.5 Mile Deep Hole Drilled Into San Andreas Fault

iandoh writes "Cool research: Geologists at Stanford University and the US Geological Survey have drilled a 2.5 mile deep borehole into the San Andreas fault. They've extracted over one ton of rock from 2 miles down, and they'll be installing sensors down the length of the borehole."

204 comments

  1. Lex Luthor is Pleased by hedgemage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, sure, just do his work for him. Why not install some nuclear warheads down there while you're at it.

    1. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wasn't it Christopher Walken? And wasn't it TNT?

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    2. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because the hole's not big enough. Sure it's deep. But your typical underground nuclear blast involved drilling a hole 6000 feet deep and 10 or 15 feet in diameter. Now that's a hole. Something you can fall into....

    3. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      "Otisville?"

    4. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otisburg.

    5. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 4, Funny

      Time to start investing in midwestern property - it'll soon be prime beachfront real estate!

    6. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Zymergy · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's Mr. Zorin to you! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090264/

    7. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Midwestern property?!?! What ever happened to Arizona & Nevada?!?!

    8. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everyone seems to think that, but given that the area in question is up to a mile above sea-level, none of the land you buy before the lithoforming will actually be "waterfront". The best you can hope for is "ocean view."

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Dusthead+Jr. · · Score: 1

      That's Otisburg

    10. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by iendedi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, sure, just do his work for him. Why not install some nuclear warheads down there while you're at it. Dick Cheney is Lex Luthor.
      --

      It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
    11. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Spacejock · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no. Drill a bunch more holes, just like the tear-off line on toilet paper, and California will be safe forever.

      After all, did you ever see toilet paper actually rip along the holes?

    12. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by shawb · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to owning beautiful beach-front property on Arizona Bay.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    13. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Yep. A view to a kill. Same thought came to my mind. Now only pump up some water down into it...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    14. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I have.

    15. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Chain paper on the other hand ...........

    16. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by iknowcss · · Score: 1

      I think you're thinking of matzo bread.

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    17. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by obergfellja · · Score: 0

      at first I thought that said:

        have drilled a 2.5 mile deep BUTThole

    18. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      How is this modded interesting?!?!? I've read some pretty outrageous, unfounded, and absurd claims on slashdot, but this takes the cake. Nowhere in the Midwest is close to a mile above sea level. DENVER COLORADO is close to a mile above sea level. The highest point in the Midwest is listed as Eagle Mountain (2301ft, or about .44 miles). http://www.peakbagger.com/range.aspx?rid=152 Most of the Midwest is closer to 500ft or less above sea level.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    19. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      You'll have to get the Rocky Mountains out of your way first though.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    20. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by djasbestos · · Score: 1

      Actually, the 13th step of the capitol building is at exactly 5,280 ft.

    21. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      After all, did you ever see toilet paper actually rip along the holes?

      Must ... not ... make ... 'hole' ... joke ...

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    22. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except there's the slight complication of a much worse fault line running through southeast Missouri: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Madrid_Fault_Zone

    23. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Dude, Albuquerque Sunport (airport)

      FAA Identifier: ABQ
      Lat/Long: 35-02-24.8000N / 106-36-33.1000W
      35-02.413333N / 106-36.551667W
      35.0402222 / -106.6091944
      (estimated)
      Elevation: 5355 ft. / 1632.2 m (surveyed)

      I live in the mountains east of Abq and were close to 7000 feet. Just down the road, it hits 10,678 feet. The southwest has lots of mile high elevations.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    24. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      MY GOD!!! What are you doing!?! I said, "Stick it in your borehole."

      Now go wash that off.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    25. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Xeirxes · · Score: 1

      Yucca Mountain took care of those two problems.

    26. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Zaatxe · · Score: 3, Funny

      [...] but given that the area in question is up to a mile above sea-level, [...]

      Have you fogotten that global warming will rise the level of the oceans?

      --
      So say we all
    27. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but, why would you want to move there?

    28. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      Haha. There's an old Bulgarian joke that runs along those lines:

      The Soviet engineers have come up with a new plane that goes faster than anything the world's ever seen before. Only problem is that when it hits top speed the wings tear off. The engineers spend months trying different support structures, strange new materials, anything to make it work. Finally, one of them decides to try drilling a series of small holes where the wings meet the plane plane which, of course, solved the problem.

      I guess it was funny back when my parents were still young...

    29. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Saganaga · · Score: 1

      You've been watching too many terrible Kevin Costner movies, methinks.

    30. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by japhmi · · Score: 1

      The southwest has lots of mile high elevations.

      Time to start investing in midwestern property - it'll soon be prime beachfront real estate!

      I'm not sure about the rest of the country, but where I'm from the midwest is pretty much defined as east of the rockies. The two of you are not talking about the same place.
      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    31. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      That joke is as bulgarian as it is french, in other words, we have it here too.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    32. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Don't spoil it for the kids.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    33. Re:Lex Luthor is Pleased by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      When my parents were young it was an Irish scientist. That's why I adapted the joke ;-)

  2. A Movie by rustalot42684 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a bad scifi film where they have to mine some tachyon fracture fault or the universe will explode.

    1. Re:A Movie by sonicsft · · Score: 1

      Sounds like A View to a Kill to me.

  3. And soon, they'll have... by ScentCone · · Score: 0

    ... one milllllion dollars!

    Or was it a Lex Luthor thing? Can't keep the earthquake inducing villains straight.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:And soon, they'll have... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can't keep the earthquake inducing villains straight. There are gay earthquake inducing villains? Who knew?
      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:And soon, they'll have... by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

      ... one milllllion dollars!
      In Oklahoma you get way more than that every time you drill a hole that deep..
    3. Re:And soon, they'll have... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well it is California. And San Francisco lies on a fault line. This ties in with my post on lubrication.

    4. Re:And soon, they'll have... by Rockin'Robert · · Score: 0

      Quake, slip, snip = dead sensors.
      What's another million?
      RR

  4. Only 2.5 miles? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fault is between the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate, both of which IIRC are more than 50 miles thick. Why are we looking at only the upper 5%? ( Modern oil wells are drilled as deep as 6 miles or more now. )

    1. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Protonk · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Seems deeper than the average depth of most oil and gas wells. Were you thinking of the depth of wells on the ocean floor from sea level?

      It does seem to be less than the record there. But we can hardly fualt (har har) the team for not digging the full 50 miles to the asthenosphere. :)

    2. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by tyrione · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Modern oil rigs don't drill into one of the world's largest fault lines. This depth will give a very broad understanding, topologically the distribution of vibration analysis, fracture mechanics, etc., etc.

      Models will be developed to study and help with how the Earth expands and contracts.

    3. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      One thing I don't understand is whether installing the sensors is worth it or not. It's on a fault line. Isn't it likely that the first subsequent earthquake will misalign the hole and disconnect the sensors?

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    4. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Informative
      A quick google revealed the following:

      The deepest oil well penetrates a mere six miles (ten kilometers) into the crust (the center of the Earth is about 4,000 miles [6,000 kilometers] deeper). Russian scientists dug the deepest hole on the planet in Siberia, but bottomed out at about 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) below the surface. The Mohole project, a 1950s-era U.S. plan, called for drilling a hole 25 miles (40 kilometers) down to the Mohorovicic discontinuity, the boundary between the hard rocks of the crust and the gooey mantle. Sadly, the only discontinuity Mohole ever encountered involved government funding.
      It gets harder and harder to drill deep into the Earth because rocks get softer and softer. Brittle at the surface, rocks become plastic at depth, and the pressure caused by the weight of the overlaying crust--about 52,800 pounds per square inch (3,700 kilograms per square centimeter) at a depth of ten miles (16 kilometers), says drilling consultant William Maurer--collapses deep wells, making further drilling impossible.
    5. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh, if an oil company *did* dig this deep into the San Andreas Fault, I'm *sure* they would be applauded for the scientific discovery they've facilitated...

    6. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      We aren't drilling 6 miles into the fault because any oil that might have been in there would have already oozed out onto the surface.

    7. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by skelly33 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Last summer I took a guided tour down into a hard-rock mine shaft several miles deep here in California. One of the questions that was asked was what happens if there is an earthquake and people are in the mine. The answer surprised me: they can't feel earthquakes down there, so the effect is nil.

      Apparently, we were told, the destructive force of earthquakes is carried along the upper couple hundred feet of the surface. I am reminded of a body of water that has waves and turmoil on the surface but which is quite calm below the surface.

      My guess would be that the sensors don't go any further down because they don't need to.

    8. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by doktorjayd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Modern oil wells are drilled as deep as 6 miles or more now.

      heh,

      and modern measures are in metric.

    9. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I suspect that they were lying to you to prevent panic. Mines are a favored place to study earthquakes. Indeed, being in a mine probably gets you closer to the epicenter, as most eathquakes are centered miles below ground.

      from iopd.og:

      Hundreds to thousands of small to moderate earthquakes per day are recorded in a typical deep mine; the strongest may reach an intensity of magnitude 5. Given that many of these earthquakes are controlled directly by the mining activity, their location, timing, and magnitude can be forecast, and instruments can be installed at sites where earthquakes of interest are predicted to occur. The mine infrastructure provides access to the earthquakes' source region and allows three-dimensional mapping of the fault zone. It also allows installation of a three-dimensional array of instruments 1-100 m from an anticipated hypocenter to monitor fault activity before, during, and after an earthquake. Most expected earthquakes exhibit a moment-magnitude range (-2 to 4) that bridges the scale gap between laboratory experiments and tectonic earthquakes in the crust. The mine infrastructure provides an opportunity to investigate the effects of fracturing during earthquakes on fault fluid, gas chemistry, and microbiological communities. These promising conditions have led to the building of an earthquake laboratory in the TauTona gold mine in January 2005 as part of the DAFSAM-NELSAM project From the Southern California Earthquake Center:

      Northridge earthquake had a hypocentral depth of 18 kilometers (11 miles), deep for a California earthquake, but considered shallow compared to other regions. ( In California even the earthquakes are shallow. )

      An interesting map is at http://seismo.berkeley.edu/istat/ex_depth_plot/

    10. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait... they "bottomed out" at 7.5 miles? Somebody's not telling us something. Did they hit the table on which the earth sits? Or perhaps the impervious shell of a turtle?

    11. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      The answer surprised me: they can't feel earthquakes down there, so the effect is nil.

      As someone who has experienced a relatively minor tremor while underground, I can tell you the effect is definitely not nil

      In my case, it almost resulted in needing a change of trousers.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    12. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by E++99 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I suspect that they were lying to you to prevent panic. Mines are a favored place to study earthquakes. Indeed, being in a mine probably gets you closer to the epicenter, as most eathquakes are centered miles below ground.

      Yes, being a couple km down gets you probably closer to the epicenter. But since the weight pressure on the rock increases linearly with depth, it is reasonable to think that the movement in earthquakes decreases linearly with depth, until it reaches whatever movement was at the epicenter.

      Imagine if you took a large compression spring, held it vertically from the bottom, placing a rock on top. Any sudden movement you make with your hand (the epicenter), will result in an amplified oscillation of the rock (the surface), with linearly smaller movements along the spring. IANA earthquakeologist, but it seems to me like an roughly appropriate model.
    13. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by ShatteredArm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, their drill began melting. Heat is the biggest obstacle to drilling further than 7 or 8 miles into the earth.

    14. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      No they did not find any turtle shell, however I have it on good authority that they found some leathery grey substance but some guy's flashing UU badges came and took it. It's funny though no one saw what vehicle they came in.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    15. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      While this is possibly true, the real purpose of the drilling is not understanding, but prevention of earthquakes.

      Over five tons of sheep's bladders are going to be dumped directly into the hole. It is the firm belief of Arthur and all of his brave knights (and also Sir Robin), that this allow many more years of peace within this land...at least, as soon as the duck-weight based justice system is instituded.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    16. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      That depends very much where you drill I suppose. A rough estimate would be that if the crust is twice as thick, temperature will rise half as fast.
      I seem to recall that oil wells are only found far away from fault lines (it would be nice to know for sure).

    17. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by rts008 · · Score: 0

      Heh! Heh!
      When I'm drillin', I don't "bottom out" 'til 8 inches..er, I mean miles.

      What? Oh, this is /.!....nevermind! *looks out basement window at cute neighbor's house again wistfully*

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    18. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by mike2R · · Score: 1

      However, even if the main mine workings are deep enough to avoid damage, it does seem likely that the entrances and ventilation could be destroyed.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    19. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      Well, for comparison, the Kora Borehole, which is the deepest achieved at 7.6 miles, was done at a point where the crust is estimated to be 22 miles thick.

    20. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Dr.+Smoove · · Score: 0

      You mean: Currently, modern measurements are in metric now also.

      --
      "If you plant ice, you're gonna harvest wind."
    21. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Larston · · Score: 1

      They probably meant that the surface waves typically are not felt at the depth of the mine. Surface waves travel along the surface of the earth only (duh) and also happen to be the largest amplitude waves and the most destructive. If there were a large earthquake nearby, you might feel a bump or two from the body waves, but they are nothing compared to the survace waves. A seismometer, however, is quite capable of picking up body wave signals from smaller earthquakes. I'd say the scientists are interested in body waves at depth, since they will be much less attenuated than those recorded with an instrument on the surface.

    22. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually their bit did not begin melting. High pressure high temperature (HPHT) drilling equipment has been around for some time. The deepest wells in the Gulf of Mexico go to 25,000 feet plus from the surface and deeper ones are planned and certainly within the technology today. More money has gone into drilling bit development and well technology than the space program! Oil and gas wells are also routinely drilled in and around fault zones as active faults are great at providing conduits for hydrocarbons, creating pressure cells, preventing hydrocarbons from migrating out of the reservoir, etc.... The Cusiana field in Colombia is drilled within an active fault zone and is one of the largest in the world. Boreholes there collapse within a few years becaues they are actually drilled through active faults that are moving today.

    23. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      However, due to higher than expected temperatures at this depth and location, 180 C (356 F) instead of expected 100 C (212 F), drilling deeper was deemed infeasible and the drilling was stopped in 1992.[3] With the expected further increase in temperature with increasing depth, drilling to 15,000 metres (49,210 ft) would have meant working at a projected 300 C (572 F), at which the drill bit would no longer work.

      Clearly, heat was the factor that cause them to stop drilling. Maybe they have more advanced technology now (the Kola borehole was drilled two decades ago), but heat still becomes a problem at some point, and there's bound to be some sort of mathematical barrier where the cost of improving technology in order to drill deeper exceeds the expected value received from drilling deeper.
    24. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      No, it's well known that they stopped because they reached hell.

    25. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Thanks, Linux clipboard. That link was supposed to go to http://www.snopes.com/religion/wellhell.asp.

    26. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Indeed, being in a mine probably gets you closer to the epicenter,

      Don't hardly neither. The epicenter is on the surface by definition.

      RYOFP: Northridge earthquake had a hypocentral depth of 18 kilometers

      Hypocenter is the word you want.

      rj

    27. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      "I seem to recall that oil wells are only found far away from fault lines"

      Oil wells are found wherever someone drills them.
      But if you drill one near a fault, the oil will be long gone
      Oil's a liquid, it will flow out along the cracks.
      Oil and gas is usually found under layer of impervious rock shaped like an upside down bowl.
      That's what they look for in the seismographs.

    28. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      They struck the river Styx.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    29. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1
      Surface Waves


      Travelling only through the crust, surface waves are of a lower frequency than body waves, and are easily distinguished on a seismogram as a result. Though they arrive after body waves, it is surface waves that are almost enitrely responsible for the damage and destruction associated with earthquakes. This damage and the strength of the surface waves are reduced in deeper earthquakes.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    30. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This message was currently now brought to you by the department of redundancy department.

    31. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, those lazy bastards! You go tell them how to drill a 50 mile deep hole. It is obviously very easy and cheap.

    32. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      This new learning intrigues me. Explain to me again how sheep's bladders can be employed to prevent earthquakes.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    33. Re:Only 2.5 miles? by syrinje · · Score: 1

      Being underground gets you closer to the "Focus" of the earthquake - the epi-center is the point on the Earth surface directly above the focus. If the mine is in the liquefaction zone - you can put your head between your knees and kiss yourself goodbye. Yes, they were lying to you. On the other hand, a smaller hole deep underground might actually facilitate survival, and come out unscathed much like a bubble in a votex. YMMW :)

      --
      See that long UID - that's what you get for lurking too long
  5. In other news by kpainter · · Score: 1

    Geologists at Stanford University and the US Geological Survey by drilling a 2.5 mile deep borehole into the San Andreas fault, caused a magnitude 9.0 earthquake.

    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      My company (we do geological services) covered that rig when they started drilling. They were drilling outside of Parkfield, CA where there was a fault lock. Approx every 30 years there, an earthquake about Magnitude 6-7 happened. I believe 2004 was 32 years since the last quake. I know Stanford was hoping to put some geophones down there to see what kind of readings they could get when the quake went off.

      I was only down there for a week, but I was talking to the person who was there to finish the job. She said the quake went off before they had finished drilling and it was pretty wild.

      I guess they didn't get the geophone data, but it looks like they finally passed the fault and got some pretty good geological data. Cool!

    2. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually,

            I wonder if this might go the other way? Could we, through strategic drilling/mining, *relieve* stress and prevent (or reduce the magnitude of) earthquakes?

  6. Don't let them fool you! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's probably the CIA trying to recover a lost Soviet rock diver.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Don't let them fool you! by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      It's probably the CIA trying to recover a lost Soviet rock diver.

      A land-based Project Jennifer? Anybody know what the Glomar Explorer has been up to?

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  7. No, it's Doctor Who by kalpol · · Score: 1
    --
    12:50 - press return.
  8. The fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they know this will cause a fault to spread across the hemisphere and cause a major part of the planet to fly away.

    1. Re:The fools! by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      this will cause a fault to spread across the hemisphere and cause a major part of the planet to fly away.

            Hopefully the United States.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:The fools! by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      You'll miss us. Who'll blow stuff up when we're gone?

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:The fools! by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Someone please mark parent as flamebait.

      --
      The game.
    4. Re:The fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The country we all love to hate!!!

    5. Re:The fools! by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Real slashdotters read at -1 anyway, so mod me down all you want.

      Verteiron actually gets it, without being all "offended" and reactionary like you are being.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:The fools! by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hopefully the United States.

      That would be cool. We Yanks could gather 'round the edge of our continent and piss on the rest of you from low earth orbit. So, instead of bitching about 50 million Republicans pissing on the world in some figurative sense, you would get splashed in the face by the real deal!

      --
      This is my sig.
    7. Re:The fools! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Like the Bugs Bunny episode where he saws Florida off the U.S. and lets it float away because he's pissed about the two cent fine for hunting rabbits out of season.

    8. Re:The fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was born and raised in the usa. I see where your comment is coming from but it's way late. Western influence spread like a disease (and it is) across the face of the planet long ago. Even if all of the usa was completely destroyed and everyone inside her boarders killed it wouldn't make much of a difference, the materialism and hatered we have created as idols are already bowed down to by people all across the globe.

      You don't have to look at it like that though- even though the usa contributed to this sad reality it had been stirring since the dawn of time. We as a nation may have done more to push its spread but the truth is it would have happened even if the north american continent never existed.

      What it boils down to is people. Not people from this country, people from that country, people with this color skin, people with this color hair, people with this taste in fashion or music, people with this political stance-- none of that matters. People, simply people, are the problem.

      Does that mean everyone should die? I used to think so. The truth is though, believe it or not, there are decent people out there that understand what really matters and I believe it is for these peoples sake that everything hasn't completely collapsed yet. These are the people most often ridiculed without cause, leaned on and despised without cause. I would know. I did it to many of them myself.

    9. Re:The fools! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      And if you said what you said about most other countries, you'd probably get modded flamebait. Double standards are lame.

      I honestly don't know if I find the joke funny or offensive, but I do think that the same standard should be applied to all jokes in that vein. Then again, double standards for what people say are a problem of society in general, not just slashdot moderation.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    10. Re:The fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT'S JUST A FUCKING JOKE!
      No need to invade a country over it. Jesus.

    11. Re:The fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA should be capitalized. It's "borders" not "boarders" North American should be capitalized. "hatred" not "hatered" You should probably brush up on basic English. I'm not trying to be a dick, but there's a difference between a misspelling like say, typing "slashdor" because r and t are next to each other, and making repeated errors. No one will take you seriously until you can express yourself seriously. You have some good ideas, why not learn to share them fully?

    12. Re:The fools! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      The best thing about America is Capitalism.
      Unfortunately, the worst thing about America is Capitalism.

    13. Re:The fools! by quax · · Score: 1

      I think this warrants a new category. Rather than 'insightful' I really think 'terminally depressed' captures it better.

  9. Whew by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    Let me tell you something. After digging that hole I am ready for a six-pack. And I wish they would have thrown in a pair of gloves, cuz I gots some serious blisters.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me tell you something. After digging that hole I am ready for a six-pack

      Q: But how many lawyers will it take to fill that hole?

      A: I don't know, but keep pilling em in!

    2. Re:Whew by yakmans_dad · · Score: 1

      Well, I thought your comment was funny.

      Maybe if you had used a headline like "It's Miller Time!"

  10. Deep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy snappin' assholes that's deep!

    1. Re:Deep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally a hole tighter than the woman........

  11. faulty logic. by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They've extracted over one ton of rock from 2 miles down, and they'll be installing sensors down the length of the borehole.

    I wouldn't want to be the guy who's in charge of monitoring sensory data from something called "the bore hole". that sounds like a really tedious job.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:faulty logic. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want to be the guy who's in charge of monitoring sensory data from something called "the bore hole". that sounds like a really tedious job.

      Better that than "the boar hole" ... those things can be really dangerous when you piss them off.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:faulty logic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something called "the bore hole". that sounds like a really tedious job.

      Or like my ex-girlfriend!

      (posting anonymously out of shame)

    3. Re:faulty logic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And better that then monitoring Neils Bohr's hole.

    4. Re:faulty logic. by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      But who wouldn't want an exciting career in boring?

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    5. Re:faulty logic. by zen_sky · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about it, that guy is probably running linux, its all good.

    6. Re:faulty logic. by tkw954 · · Score: 1
      I remember seeing a section heading in a British Yellow Pages:

      Boring: See Civil Engineers

  12. Isn't that 2.6 miles Canadian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or is it 4.2 KM?

  13. About time by Xeth · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel our economy will be well served by the extra 6 energy.

    --
    If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    1. Re:About time by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Damn, beat me to it. I'll spare y'all the obligatory joke about mindworm attacks.

    2. Re:About time by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

      Energy? You build the boreholes for the MINERALS, the energy is just a side benefit!

    3. Re:About time by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      We require more vespene gas, not minerals or energy, dammit!

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    4. Re:About time by Xeth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I figured that didn't have the same contemporary "pop"; The U.S. seems to have more of an energy problem than a mineral problem (it's my understanding that soaring metals prices are just a side-effect of an all-around plummeting dollar).

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    5. Re:About time by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

      Hmm this is getting out of hand, time to nerve-staple the drones.

  14. Installing sensors? by baffled · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should dump a few tons of super glue down there. That'll fix her.

    1. Re:Installing sensors? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Howabout some crude oil instead, to lubricate the friction and prevent further earthquakes.

    2. Re:Installing sensors? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Might be a better idea then those Indonesians dumping concrete into a volcano I guess.

    3. Re:Installing sensors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When asked for comment about whether or not lubricating the 2.5 mile borehole might prevent earthquakes, legendary porn star Ron Jeremy said "Excuse me", immediately booked a flight to California, and departed with a 55 gallon drum of Astroglide.

    4. Re:Installing sensors? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      What blows me away is that this a) never made the national news and b) you can't find ANY photos of it online, anywhere. Total radio silence on it.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    5. Re:Installing sensors? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1
      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  15. You said borehole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they'll name it after George Takei.

  16. talc as a lubricant by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They drilled in a part of the San Andreas fault that creeps and doesn't generate big earthquakes. My take is that they're looking for a lubricant, something that allows the fault to slide. Another possibility would be merely that the fault doesn't have bends or splits in it unlike the faulting at the south end of the San Francisco Bay. The San Andreas fault runs along a chain of mountains south of Silicon Valley and then north through San Francisco, following the coast thereafter, while the Haywood fault runs along the base of mountains east of the Bay area from Milpitas to north of Oakland.

    If a lubricant is responsible for the fault creep, there are apparently several possibilities: water, serpentine (which can be formed by weathering or metamorphization of several minerals including olivene/peridot), or talc (formed by serpentine exposed to water). If you have talc, you probably have the other two as well. Serpentine is a bit harder than talc (the latter is soft enough to easily scratch with a fingernail), but both deform easily under pressure. I seem to recall cases where serpentine has "bubbled up" over millions of years through denser rock, acting as a very slow moving fluid.

    As I see it, if we can understand how to lubricate faults, then it is possible to not just trigger faults, but also to ease pressure on a fault. Maybe the cost of the materials will make it infeasible, but we can consider it now.

    1. Re:talc as a lubricant by dustwun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does a reply to this involving 'Lubing the bore hole" get modded as funny, or troll?.. you be the judge....

    2. Re:talc as a lubricant by khallow · · Score: 1

      "Pitching them easy", the story of my life as a slashdot straight man.

    3. Re:talc as a lubricant by dodongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      while the Haywood fault runs along the base of mountains east of the Bay area from Milpitas to north of Oakland


      It's called the Hayward fault, and it experiences plenty of creep all along the East Bay. The last quake greater than 4 that happened on it was basically across the street from my apartment. Trust, it's moving, and generally nonviolently (though noticeably at times). In fact, it runs through the middle of Memorial Stadium in Berkeley, which is built in two halves that have crept about a foot and a half offset since the stadium's construction.
    4. Re:talc as a lubricant by dodongo · · Score: 1

      I should note that while it is creeping, it's also the strongest candidate for major quakeage based on many recent San Francisco doomesday predictions.

    5. Re:talc as a lubricant by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

      Does a reply to this involving 'Lubing the bore hole" get modded as funny, or troll?.. you be the judge....
      It's not the bore hole needing the lube job, it's the crack.
      I can't believe I just said that in a serious discussion...
    6. Re:talc as a lubricant by khallow · · Score: 1

      And when you ordered your degree in Geology from degreesdirect.com, did you frame it?

      Yea, cheap $20 frame. On the wall.

      BTW, if you happen to ever have anything interesting to say, feel free to post.

    7. Re:talc as a lubricant by E++99 · · Score: 1

      In fact, it runs through the middle of Memorial Stadium in Berkeley, which is built in two halves that have crept about a foot and a half offset since the stadium's construction.

      Talk about home field advantage! "Upon further review, the 10-yard-line is now 11 yards from the goal line, and the first down is voided. Bears' ball!"
    8. Re:talc as a lubricant by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Not everything in California starts and stops near San Fransisco.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    9. Re:talc as a lubricant by khallow · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is quite true. You have the beach, Silicon Valley, Oakland, and the rest of California too.

    10. Re:talc as a lubricant by khallow · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the problem is that most of the fault doesn't creep, but is locked. I think the part you refer to near Berkeley is between two locked segments. One of the worst case scenarios is that both segments go at the same time.

  17. Ahem... by Carpe+PM · · Score: 1
    http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0059065/

    Not THAT bad... kinda.

  18. How the hell ? by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

    Can someone please explain how to unlock this feature ? Is it similar to the Hot Coffee mod ? Where can I download it ? I've been playing San Andreas for years but have never encountered any kind of drilling mission or mod.

    1. Re:How the hell ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two and a half mile hole is the Hot Coffee mod.

    2. Re:How the hell ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't consider Hot Coffee to be a drilling mission?

    3. Re:How the hell ? by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      Wrong one, we are talking 2 1/2 mile deep not 2 1/2 wide

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    4. Re:How the hell ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The drilling mission *was* the Hot Coffee mod. ;)

  19. Borehole Fetish by eggman9713 · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, I love boreholes. Damn that just sounds so dirty, it sounds like a really weird sexual fetish.

  20. Dear God, No! by cmcguffin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Keep the Mole Men down there where they belong!

  21. Hiroki Sone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy needs some serious upper body development. Look at his arms! If he is going to keep working drill rigs, he will need to start getting some serious guns if he plans on packing drill cores around.

    Either that, or he better stick to chalk boards.

  22. We did it, the Russian's did it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say in place of the sensors, we put a flag there - so we know who's fault it is!

  23. Geology kegger by jayemcee · · Score: 1

    'In early December, a "sample party" will be held at the USGS office in Menlo Park, where the cores will be on display and scientists will offer their proposals to do research projects in a bid to be allowed to analyze part of the core.' I can only imagine the carnage after some disappointed geologist grabs a sample of core and teaches them all whose fault it is...

  24. 2.5 miles down? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, thank you. I'm not checking there for a hidden package.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  25. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, help a brother out here. I don't get the reference.

    1. Re:WTF? by Xeth · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri (a spiritual branch from the Civilization series, which I consider better than any of the Civ proper games that followed it), thermal boreholes are terrain improvements that provide +6 energy and minerals (a great deal by the game's standards).

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    2. Re:WTF? by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Yes, but watch out for that Xenofungus!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  26. Silica Gel reducing friction in fault zones? by Diamonddavej · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My favored culprit for drastic friction reduction during faulting is lubricating Silica Gel; finely crushed quartz in the active fault zone reacts with water forming fluidic silica gel. There is excellent laboratory evidence of silica gel lubrication in simulated fault zones (see Mineral Gel May Reduce Rock Friction to Zero During Earthquakes, http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=100325. All that is needed is field evidence, and I think I have it.

    1. Re:Silica Gel reducing friction in fault zones? by Speare · · Score: 1

      My favored culprit for drastic friction reduction during faulting is lubricating Silica Gel; finely crushed quartz in the active fault zone reacts with water forming fluidic silica gel. And I have it on good authority that it's best to spray highways with huge vats of chicken fat and banana peels just before rush hour...
      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Silica Gel reducing friction in fault zones? by HarvardAce · · Score: 1

      My favored culprit for drastic friction reduction during faulting is lubricating Silica Gel; Just make sure you don't eat it!
      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    3. Re:Silica Gel reducing friction in fault zones? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Y'all are wimps. Here in Colorado we used to produce earthquakes by lubricating old faults with chemical WMD's including nerve gas because everyone knows the best thing to do with nerve gas is pump it into a hole just outside of an enormous city.

      Some friends of mine had a gold mine that kept collapsing -- they got most of their gold from a slip area at a fault line, and that's what was moving. The snag was: why were the earthquakes happening once a month, on Saturday morning? People started asking questions, and it turned out it was the Army pumping WMD's into holes.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    4. Re:Silica Gel reducing friction in fault zones? by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Silica Gel reducing friction in fault zones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back where I come from we just call it mud.

  27. Now I've somewhere to dump my used motor oil! by TofuDog · · Score: 1

    Then again, maybe we shouldn't butter her up. I hope Pele's bad sista' Shake-Shake doesn't feel violated and go tectonic on us -I live on the fault!

  28. Slow News Day? by Canar · · Score: 1

    I don't get why this is newsworthy. Pretty boring to me.

    *rimshot*

    *runs and hides from the angry mob*

  29. comedy gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    c'mon mods. You need to drill down a bit for your sense of humor indicators.

    1. Re:comedy gold by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about joking?

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
  30. Oh i thought that... by garompeta · · Score: 1

    ...it was again about us crossing the frontier to California...
    I was like, holy madre de Dios, wtf?

  31. Why was this tagged goatse? by smegged · · Score: 1

    Seriously, was this tagged goatse to stop me clicking the link? I mean this is slashdot, it's not like I would have clicked the link anyway.

    1. Re:Why was this tagged goatse? by dirtyhippie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      mod parent up. what's up with the repeated tag malfunctions? the tagging system seems to have some serious flaws (remember itsatrap day when every single story was tagged that way?)

    2. Re:Why was this tagged goatse? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Ummm, it's a massive hole... ok, so maybe it's really deep not really wide but still.

  32. Earthscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SAFOD is part of the Earthscope project. I work on the GPS portion of the project called the Plate Boundary Observatory in a consultant role.

    There is actually a funny story I was told about the original earthscope project proposal. I have no reason to doubt its validity, but I wasn't there:

    The original proposal was made to the higher ups at the National Science Foundation. While the scientists made their grand sweeping pitch to NSF, there was a debate in the background on whether or not to show the final slide with the cost of the project.

    At the end of the presentation, the NSF manager says "How much is this going to cost me?"

    They pause and finally put up the last slide: $400,000,000 (400 million) over 5 years

    The response of the NSF manager: "YES! Your finally bringing me a project that isn't some nickle and dime deal that I have to cover out of my budget. I can go to congress and make this a congressional line item. Excellent."

    And he managed to pull it off. That is the way government works.

    Regards,

    --Keith

  33. Primitive Tribe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    worships hole in ground.

  34. Borehole by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

    All adjacent areas are reporting increased energy and mineral production. Peculiar worms have also been reported in the area.

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    1. Re:Borehole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try but boreholes only give increased production on its own area.

    2. Re:Borehole by witte · · Score: 1

      "Tremors" ? ;-)

  35. Well to Hell by skeftomai · · Score: 1

    Ooh...maybe a bat-like apparition will fly out again...

    Quick! Someone spread a rumor and see if it shows up on TBN!

  36. MORBO IS PLEASED!!! by Greg.Rodden · · Score: 1

    ..but sticky

    --
    I have ridden the mighty moon worm!
  37. Poor turtle! by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

    But what if they drilled right through the unfortunate testudinate?

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    1. Re:Poor turtle! by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Who do you reckon would win in a fight, the Balrog or Cthulhu? ("Nine qualudes on the squid!")

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  38. Uhm...why? by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    Great; there's a hole now, artificially changing the semi-predictable nature of the problem. What's going to fill it? Oh, yeah....water. The same thing that fills the empty space under Houston where they've been pulling oil out for over a century.

    Like the other poster mentioned, does digging a mere 5% into this famously-fragile section really reveal anything we didn't know before? Seems like they'd pick a place that _doesn't_ have 20 million people involved, if they open a hole to say, lava or something else that induces a change under there...but I'm just a layman.

    It's just the line "don't tug on Superman's cape" comes to mind...

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  39. Lubricant by hernyo · · Score: 1

    You forgot K-Y jelly.

    1. Re:Lubricant by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well K-Y is more or less manmade. But we could inject it deep within Mother Earth. As long as pressure and stress has been released beforehand (you don't want to trigger something that you can get blamed for), this is a great way to prevent jamming, which leads to big quakes.

    2. Re:Lubricant by hernyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lubing the 2.5 mile hole, then pushing the drill down to the bottom of it and taking it out, repeating many times - now THAT is going to cause a HUGE quake!

      Muhahahahaaaa (I guess I'm going to be modded down)

    3. Re:Lubricant by khallow · · Score: 1

      Muhahahahaaaa (I guess I'm going to be modded down)

      This far in a thread, our sins lie beneath deepest darkness. No mod is gonna find us here.

      Did ya feel the Earth.... move?
  40. Nice combination by Greg2k · · Score: 1

    Loderunner + GTA, now THAT'S a game!

  41. A view to a kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the same hole that 007 plugged in 1987.

  42. Brilliant by Whiteox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Idiots!
    What a dumb move.
    Geophysicist Nerd 1: "Hey let's drill a hole 2.5 miles into a known fault!"
    Geophysicist Nerd 2: "OK! Let's do it."
    drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill drill
    Nerd 2: "Now what?"
    Nerd 1: "Ummm... How about we put some sensors down there?"
    Nerd 2: "Hey! Why not!!!"
    Nerd 1: "Errmmm... Shit! We've only got 1000ft of wire!"
    Nerd 2: "Damn!"
    .
    .
    "Hey! What's that really hot red stuff bubbling out of the hole?"

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  43. Expanding earth discredited - parent not insightf by pglee · · Score: 1

    Whilst the study will provide insight to many issues, it will not help as you have described.

    The expanding/contracting earth hypothesis has long been discredited. It was originally proposed as a mechanism for mountain/basin formation. See this excerpt from Kearey & Vine, Global Tectonics (excellent book on the subject I used studying geology at uni)
    http://books.google.com/books?id=usiqam9p7GAC&pg=RA1-PA248&lpg=RA1-PA248&dq=expanding+contracting+earth+hypothesis&source=web&ots=zMEsYJotvA&sig=zlFveSBMr73m6Srq3ahXADG8Vkc

    Vibration analysis - I assume you mean the geophones that are placed downhole will help. However more comprehensive global coverage with seismometers would be better. The global seismometer net (instigated to monitor nuclear detonations from the the 1950s) is predominantly northern hemisphere.

    Fracture mechanics - potentially. However the mechanics of crust/mantle deformation are better studied through other avenues.

  44. Oblig. by Jesterrr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, San Andreas Fault bores YOU! *yawn*

    1. Re:Oblig. by myz24 · · Score: 1

      *yawn* indeed, this joke bores me

  45. Heh by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    I always went the super eco route, to the point where it was better for me to plant fungus than farms or mines. The huge mindworm boils were pretty entertaining as well. You couldn't control the main stack from a fungal bloom (at least not that same turn), but all the ones around it? No problem.

    The only time I did boreholes I did it to hasten global warming, and flood out my enemies coastal cities. Muahaha.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  46. isn't this how by Chris+whatever · · Score: 1

    They got the monsters out in Surface the series ???

  47. The deepest (yet) by dallaylaen · · Score: 1

    Russian scientists dug the deepest hole on the planet in Siberia, but bottomed out at about 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) below the surface.

    Last I heard the Kola Peninsula is not in Siberia.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole

    --
    WYSIWIG, but what you see might not be what you need
  48. Or maybe Dr Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gentlemen, I give you the Vulcan. The world's most powerful subterranean drill. So powerful it can penetrate the earth's crust, delivering a 50 kiloton nuclear warhead deep into the liquid hot core of the planet upon detonation every volcano on earth will erupt.

  49. COST by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Drilling cost go up as square of depth. Oil companies can afford spend a hundred million to drill five miles below two miles of water. The NSF cannot afford really deep holes. The entire NSF earth science budget is lees than the average oil company single deep water hole.

  50. /.Ville? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.Ville? /.Ville?

  51. Definition of "Borehole" by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    "Borehole", isn't that a slang word for a jerk who hogs a meeting?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  52. Don't drill there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you fools! you'll let the balrog out!

  53. No, the cat does not "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Beavis and Butt-head are listening to Stuart and Mr. Whatsisname work on this science project:

    Mr. Whatsisname: Stick it in my borehole, Stuart. Drill it deep, Stuart. Sink it all the way in, Stuart. Now push your sensor deep in, Stuart. If you're having trouble, move the rocks out of the way, Stuart.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  54. Think of the children by corifornia2 · · Score: 0

    Someone seriously needs to give one of the guys from the article a hand http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2007/october10/gifs/SAFOD12-CarryingCore_4477.jpg It looks like that core is about to break him in half. And there you go, typical construction site, one guy working... two guys watching, in this case, taking pictures.

  55. San Diego Earthquakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was really starting to wonder about all those recent earthquakes

  56. Ok, gotta ask... by gral · · Score: 1

    Did Stanford just buy up some real estate in Nevada?

    --
    Scott Carr
  57. Putting it Together by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Now all they need is a huge cotter pin.

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  58. Re:*BSD is Dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks.. It's been a long time, I missed it.

  59. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody's tagged this story "boring" yet?

  60. Safe in the Midwest? by jdickey · · Score: 1

    People who aren't from that part of the country might want to first learn about important details like the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Quoting the Wikipedia article (which quotes USGS and the University of Memphis), {t]he seismic zone covers parts of five U.S. states: Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky and Tennessee."

    Anything that shakes the ground enough to make the Mississippi River change course or (temporarily) "flow backward", as eyewitness reports have recorded, is not something I particularly care to be close to. But then, I grew up in the Bay Area and, as a loyal Giants fan, was in Candlestick Park for World Series Game 3 on 17 October 1989...."game called on account of earthquake", for those with short memories.

    Another reason to get humanity off this rock - it just isn't safe anywhere.

  61. Just so you know by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 1

    Aside from the trolls and "bore hole jokers" I actually "learned stuff" about geology from your original post and I'm actually a little more curious about it.

    We're not all 12-year-olds... ("we" meaning /.'ers)

  62. Core 1,12000ft; 135ft cut; 100% recovery. Film @11 by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    "Cool research: Geologists at Stanford University and the US Geological Survey have drilled a 2.5 mile deep borehole into the San Andreas fault. They've extracted over one ton of rock from 2 miles down, and they'll be installing sensors down the length of the borehole."

    Cutting 135ft of core from 12000-odd feet is absolutely routine. I've pulled similar lengths of core myself on 3 occasions in the last couple of years.

    Absolutely routine.

    I see the lazy so-and-so's are doing up the Jubilee clips with a power drill, instead of suffering with the traditional bent screwdriver that's the wrong size. And it's not snowing either, which is normally the case for core catching. Obviously there's a lazy shit-bagger somewhere up in the chain of command, doing the organisation. No way is this the first time this bunch has cored.
    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  63. Melting drill? The obvious solution. by nil0lab · · Score: 1


    Put a turbine on the hole.

    Pump water down.

    Harvest the steam, sell the energy.

    Use the funds from the geothermal power facility to fund the second hole.

    Repeat.

    Given you've converted enough water to steam it should be cool enough to go deeper.

  64. Re:Melting drill? The obvious solution. by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

    I think it would be something like:

    1. Let gravity pull water through hole.
    2. Earth heats up water and causes steam.
    3. ????
    4. Profit!