Slashdot Mirror


Meet the 5-Watt, Tiny, fit–PC

ThinSkin writes "Meet the fit-PC, a tiny 4.7 x 4.5 x 1.5-inch PC that only draws 5-watts, consuming in a day less power than a traditional PC consumes in one hour. By today's standards, the fit-PC has very little horsepower, which makes it apt for web browsing and light applications; today's games need not apply. Loyd Case over at ExtremeTech reviews the fit-PC and puts it through its paces, noting that performance is not this PC's strength, but rather its small size and price tag of $285."

310 comments

  1. Compare it with... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 0

    ...the Mac Mini?

    At half the price, I'm already sold. :-P

    1. Re:Compare it with... by peragrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      It has half the processor too.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can compare it with the Zonbu http://www.zonbu.com/home/index.htm/ . The Zonbu PC has no HD, just 4 GB of flash and online storage (for a fee). The Fit-PC has a 40 GB HD; similar pricing for the hardware.

    3. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gumstick -- bit bigger

      XO -- XO includes display

      I like the form factor. They should sell one with FLASH instead of HD. Wish the price was below $200, of course, with the fall in the Dollar it'll be $300 next year.

    4. Re:Compare it with... by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, the iPhone or the iPod Touch might be a closer comparison imho. The 5watt PC is a good deal less powerful (in both senses of the word) than the mac mini.

      Of course, I know which one I'd take, if given the choice. For my money, getting a 5w computer is kinda pointless when I'm expected to hook it up to a desktop LCD which could easily use more than 10 times that much power.

      Just for giggles, here's a point by point comparison:
      5 watt PC vs iPhone/iPod Touch
      $285 and up vs $299 and up
      AMD Geode LX800 CPU @ 500 MHz vs ARM @ ~620Mhz
      256 MB DDR (non expandable) vs 128MB? (non expandable)
      40 GB 2.5" Hard disk vs 4,8 or 16 GB flash drive
      Dual 100 Mbps Ethernet vs 802.11b/g, plus GSM/EDGE on iPhone
      SXGA controller, 640x480 to 1920x1440 vs 320x480 built in multi-touch display and 480i or 576i video out
      Two USB 2.0 high speed ports vs iPod dock port
      Speaker and microphone interface vs Speaker and microphone built i on iPhone, plus headphone/mic jack
      RS-232 serial port via RJ11 connector vs none
      Single 5V supply, 3-5 watt, fanless vs battery operated, fanless?
      120 x 116 x 40 mm, 450 gram vs 115 x 61 x 11.6mm 135g iPhone or 110 x 61.8 x 8mm 120g iPod

      --
      "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    5. Re:Compare it with... by Trinn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      one glitch there, the iPhone ARM core is at 400MHz not 620, though it does still perform quite well

    6. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course, I know which one I'd take, if given the choice. For my money, getting a 5w computer is kinda pointless when I'm expected to hook it up to a desktop LCD which could easily use more than 10 times that much power.

      Why is that pointless?

      When you want lots of power, use your regular computer which probably pulls 100-150W or so. Total power usage including LCD: 150-200W.

      When you just want to do some light websurfing, turn on this thing. Total power usage including LCD: 55W. That seems like a significant improvement to me.

      Of course, one might ask "Why not get a laptop instead? It'll use about the same amount of power, or maybe less." The answer is that to get a laptop screen of comparable resolution and quality you're going to have to pay a _lot_. Laptops are pricey, and the cheap ones have the lowest-resolution, crappiest screens (think Dell's consumer line), and having a nice big high-res screen is a good thing.

    7. Re:Compare it with... by 644bd346996 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mac Mini: 1.83 Ghz Core 2 Duo
      Tiny-PC: 500Mhz Geode

      Looks like about an eighth the processor and a quarter the RAM, for more than a third of the price.

    8. Re:Compare it with... by kiddygrinder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, i see what you're saying, it's impossible to use less electricity so why bother trying! there's no point using fluorescent lights, cause that power will be sucked up by my tv anyway! there's no point getting an efficient car cause some fucking soccer mom is driving an suv! and so on.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    9. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you get that figure from? Engadget claimed it ID'd the chip as a Samsung S3C6400, 667MhZ.

    10. Re:Compare it with... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Engadget had no evidence to support that claim. They looked at part numbers, that's all, and the part in question was rated at "up to" that speed.

    11. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most important comparison is:

      Being able to run your own software/OS vs Locked-in to Apple-approved software/OS

    12. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anybody has that info outside of Apple. Considering the level of power management needed for such a device, it wouldn't surprise me if the chip were soft clocked, so it could be running at 667 MHz or at 400 MHz or at any of a dozen other speeds, and the only way you'd know for sure would be to disassemble the kernel. :-)

    13. Re:Compare it with... by Lane.exe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Comrade! We have detected you using mathematics and logic to stop an anti-Apple tirade! Please be advised: this is Slashdot. Apple sells only massively overpriced hardware. Pointing out that Apple sells something equivalent to its actual value, instead of the fantasy-land price that internet geeks believe it should cost (id est, free) is double-plus-ungood. We here at the Ministry for Nerdy Indignation hope that you will reconsider your eminently logical position and join with us in our outrage that Apple does not price their products at Mom's Basement prices. Thank you.

      --
      IAALS.
    14. Re:Compare it with... by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Comrade! We have detected you using mathematics and logic to stop an anti-Apple tirade! Please be advised: this is Slashdot. Apple sells only massively overpriced hardware. Pointing out that Apple sells something equivalent to its actual value, instead of the fantasy-land price that internet geeks believe it should cost (id est, free) is double-plus-ungood. We here at the Ministry for Nerdy Indignation hope that you will reconsider your eminently logical position and join with us in our outrage that Apple does not price their products at Mom's Basement prices. Thank you. The Mac Mini uses 110W, the fit-PC uses 5W, the Mac Mini is 6.5x6.5x2 inches, the fit-PC is 4.2x4.2x1.5 inches, the Mac Mini is produced on a relatively massive scale compared to the fit-PC, the Mac Mini works at 10-35C, the fit-PC works at 0-70C.

      If you're comparing them based on the amount of RAM or processor speed you're being a little less than "eminently logical".
      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    15. Re:Compare it with... by urlgrey · · Score: 1

      Indeed... and on the surface, you're completely correct; however...

      Two words:

      dual
      ethernet

      As much as I love my Macs... and I *do* love 'em. The current Mac Minis are useless as dedicated firewalls as they only have one NIC.

      --
      Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
    16. Re:Compare it with... by Pengo · · Score: 1


      I think it's a waste to use a mac mini as a firewall, but if you where so inclined couldn't you just toss a USB->Ethernet adapter on the mini and call it a day?

    17. Re:Compare it with... by kanweg · · Score: 1

      Are you sure the 110W you quote isn't the number of Watts the power brick is rated, instead of its actual use? If you Google for
      power consumption "mac mini" "power meter"
      then you'll find much lower values, which - while varying for the various types of mini and use - are much, much lower that the value of 110 W you report.

      Bert

    18. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a little off on the fit-PC dimensions.
      120 mm = 4.72 inches
      116 mm = 4.57 inches
      40 mm = 1.57 inches
      http://www.fit-pc.com/specifications.htm
      Also, be my guest if you want to run a 500 MHz AMD CPU in a 70C room, which is the temperature of a hot cup of green tea (you're supposed to provide hotter temperatures for black tea etc. but I digress...).
      Perhaps Apple's 10-35C figure is on the cautionary side. What else would cause them to have different operating temperatures? Apple gave conservative battery life for the iPod mini but gave somewhat exaggerative figures for the iPod video's. Take anything with a grain of salt, I guess.

      The light weight of the fit-PC looks attractive (just 450 g as opposed to the 1.31 kg mini). However, people who are comparing the fit-PC with the mini are assuming that people will want to get a Mac and wipe clean a perfectly fine software package. I think it's fair to guess that this is a rather small percentage of the people who buy minis.

      Both the Apple-is-cheap & Apple-is-expensive sides of the debate have a point. Apple chooses which products to price competitively, and which to make expensive. The iPods and Macs are in general competitively priced while iSight, MagSafe power adapter, iPod leather case, and early adopter iPhones were priced on the expensive side. It depends.

    19. Re:Compare it with... by tsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good point; according to Apple my new iMac uses 280 W max., but in practice it's more like 120 W. Which is quite low compared to my old PC + 19" CRT, who did a nice 225 W together.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    20. Re:Compare it with... by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yeah and of course everybody leaves his monitor connected to his server and switched on at all times ;)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    21. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure it would compare more closely to my Dell Axim X51v than to my iPhone.

    22. Re:Compare it with... by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      You could also compare it with the NorhTec MicroClient which also uses a 500MHz AMD Geode LX800 CPU and which, they claim, only consumes 0.9 watts of power. The options you choose would probably affect its power consumption. It runs on 12-Volts which might make it suitable for a solar project that has 12-volt deep cycle batteries.

      For ranchers or other people who live in remote locations far from any power lines, it might be useful. Some of those people rely on solar panels, backup generators and deep cycle batteries for their power. They do not have power to waste.

      If either the peak-oil pessimists or the global warming people turn out to be correct, then such extreme energy efficiency might possibly become necessary somewhere within my lifetime. Perhaps neither scenario will ever really happen.

      My 20-inch LCD flatscreen monitor (not a wide sceen) uses about 38-Watts while I am at the computer and then only uses 1-Watt when it goes blank in the sleep mode. It spends the majority of the day with the screen blank and only using 1-Watt. I do not personally know much about either company or their computers.

      NorhTec MicroClient - New Version

    23. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Mac Mini uses 110W My (ppc) Mini uses around 25W. 110W must be the rating of the power supply, or usage with all USB and Firewire ports in use doing a disk and cpu intensive task.
    24. Re:Compare it with... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What else would cause them to have different operating temperatures?
      The reality distortion field generator draws a lot of current.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:Compare it with... by arivanov · · Score: 3, Informative

      Definitely. Though for many broadband setups you do not need the second ether because you can use a PPTP, PPPoE or L2TP relay if supported on the modem.

      As far as the article is concerned it is a demo how not to use such a system. What a bunch of clueless wankers.

      Xterm, pulseaudio (reminds me I should put the instructions for setting it on my website) and run the damn thing diskless booting over the network. All of my machines in the house run this way booting of a dedicated server which holds the disk space and runs the applications. Even the laptop when in the house is booted this way and not off its own disk. As a result even something as slow as a Transmeta @800 or Via@400 is more than enough. My firewall and my development boxes also operate this way. I have used this approach for nearly 5 years now and while it takes some effort to setup the maintenance is many times less compared to anything else. You set it once and after that it just works.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    26. Re:Compare it with... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      If you wanted to use a Mac Mini as a firewall, you could use a USB network adaptor for the upstream port (or IP over FireWire internally). If you just want a firewall, Soekris and PC Engines make Geode-based boards with 2-3 network ports that run OpenBSD nicely and boot from compact flash. They're typically cheaper than this unit too.

      I am also somewhat sceptical of something with a mechanical hard drive claiming to only use 5W.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    27. Re:Compare it with... by Adam+Hazzlebank · · Score: 1

      The Mac Mini uses 110W, the fit-PC uses 5W, the Mac Mini is 6.5x6.5x2 inches, the fit-PC is 4.2x4.2x1.5 inches, the Mac Mini is produced on a relatively massive scale compared to the fit-PC, the Mac Mini works at 10-35C, the fit-PC works at 0-70C. If you're comparing them based on the amount of RAM or processor speed you're being a little less than "eminently logical".
      Ah yes, but if your comparing them as space heaters, the Mac Mini clearly wins.
    28. Re:Compare it with... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your server has a monitor? How quaint :-)

    29. Re:Compare it with... by ReeceTarbert · · Score: 1

      The Mac Mini uses 110W

      Not true. While 110W is indeed what's written on the power brick, measurements for my 1.66 GHz Intel Core Duo Mac Mini report about 20W while idle and a little over 30W under load.

      Also, it seems to me that except for dual ethernet, the Mac Mini is better equipped than the Fit-PC:

      - 1 GB of RAM
      - 120 GB Hard Disk
      - DVI
      - 4 USB, 1 Firewire 400
      - Optical audio in/out
      - Built-in 54-Mbps wireless networking
      - Built-in Bluetooth 2.0

      Oh, and a little thing called OS X! ;-)

      Don't get me wrong, I think the Fit-PC is an interesting and has its uses but, in my opinion, saying it's cheaper compared to the Mac Mini misses the point altogether.

    30. Re:Compare it with... by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Idle on a laptop hard drive is typically around 0.5-1W, peaking at 2-3W during writes. Spin up could consume 5W on its own, albeit briefly. The CPU only uses 0.9W, so I don't think 5W would be an unreasonable number for normal operation.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    31. Re:Compare it with... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      saying it's cheaper compared to the Mac Mini misses the point altogether.
      Not if you're on a budget.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    32. Re:Compare it with... by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      For my money, getting a 5w computer is kinda pointless when I'm expected to hook it up to a desktop LCD which could easily use more than 10 times that much power.
      The monitor powers down when idle though.... so it's not 10* times greater consumption unless you use the PC 24 hours a day. Besides, 165 watts (my lcd monitor) + 5 (pc) = 170 watts is still considerably less than 415 watts = 165 + 250.

      Anyway. I'd be more interested in this fitPC if it had considerably more RAM.. say 512 or 1G.

      * It's actually more like 20-40 times.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    33. Re:Compare it with... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      And quite a bit bigger too.

      If you want super small, you have to make some compromises.

      Replace that HD with flash, and i can see a nice little dedicated industrial monitoring style machine you can stick out most anywhere and not worry about it. And in that market, 300 isnt that expensive.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    34. Re:Compare it with... by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't get me wrong, I think the Fit-PC is an interesting and has its uses but, in my opinion, saying it's cheaper compared to the Mac Mini misses the point altogether. Mac Mini starts at $599, fit-PC starts at $285. Fit-PC is cheaper, period. No "point" to be missed; one is cheaper than the other.

      What you seem to be trying to say is that Mac Mini is better value for money, but value depends on what you're using it for.

      If you need the lowest possible power consumption, space, and the widest range of operating temperatures, then Fit-PC is better value for money.
      If you need a normal PC for regular users, but you want to think that it's a special PC for special users, then a Mac Mini is going to be better value for money.
      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    35. Re:Compare it with... by emj · · Score: 1

      No one ever thought of, perhaps Apple did their own custom ARM based on the Samsung?

    36. Re:Compare it with... by crush · · Score: 1

      Brother-In-Mac-Zealotry! Desist from this blasphemous recitation of empirical evidence which heaps dishonor and opprobrium upon the pure titanium shininess of whatever crap Apple has sold to us. Mere mathematics and energy efficiency are sins of the flesh which must not sully the discourse concerning the One True Hardware Monopolist or the Doctrines of Jobs.

      Anyway, global warming isn't happening fast enough to convince the skeptics so it's necessary that we do our bit by using 20 times as much power to browse slashdot. We've all got to do our bit.

    37. Re:Compare it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the similar Alix products see also http://pcengines.ch/ (mini-itx and even smaller, may also be used for router applications, there are special linux and bsd distros for he devices)

    38. Re:Compare it with... by hey! · · Score: 1

      I can think of literally hundreds of applications for a box like this. True, if you want to browse the web and keep your total wattage in or near the single digit watt range, you may as well work on a PDA or PDA_like device. On the other hand, you throw watts into your 21" LCD for a good reason: to get a bright display. Why throw watts into a CPU that can run the latest 3D games if all you are doing is browsing the web?

      There is the possibility of using other kinds of displays that don't consume much power. High contrast, non-backlit monochrome LCDs, small PDA sized panels, even e-Paper.

      However the greatest range of uses for a device like this would be those in which being able to connect a display would be an occasional convenience, for example monitoring, logging and numerical control. You could put one of these suckers out in the boonies as a remote weather station, and run it off a solar panel and batteries. It'd make a nice packet logger, firewall, print server, or combination thereof. Most print servers I've used have been complete crap.

      Finally, I think this makes a very nice prototyping platform for in-vehicle applications where you can't draw unlimited amps. With little more than a wire stripper, a GPS, an off the shelf TFT display, and some open source geographic software, I could put together a prototype in vehicle navigation system very quickly. Or headless it could be used for vehicle position logging.

      Seriously, I could come up with a hundred viable applications for this in an afternoon, no sweat.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    39. Re:Compare it with... by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

      "Not if you're on a budget."

      Then you could buy a MacMini on e-bay for just a little more than the Fit PC.

    40. Re:Compare it with... by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

      "The current Mac Minis are useless as dedicated firewalls as they only have one NIC."

      The Fit PC doesn't make a great router/firewall either. It has a hard drive. Something that wears out. For 24/7 operation a compact flash solution like on a Soekris box is better for this role. Plus you get more ports, is expandable with a 3.3V PCI and Mini PCI. And most of the Soekris boxes cost less than the Fit PC too.

    41. Re:Compare it with... by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Informative

      So go to MadTux and get a real PC for less. 512MB of RAM, 16x DVD+-RW, 80 GB hard drive, Vector Linux installed, and 60 days of email support for $281.99 with a Sempron 3000+.

      There are other models and they can all be configured somewhat, too. What you get from MadTux is bigger and uses more power, but it's a lot more computer for the money. It's also vastly more expandable.

      If you really need silent, low-power, and small, this FitPC is quicker than building your own EPIA case but not as fun. There are lots of PC/104 and EBX systems out there that don't cost much more. It appears that this is very similar to what Ampro, Winsystems, Via, and others are already doing, but at a good price. EMAC's PCM-5893 isn't much more in single unit quantities.

      It looks like they (Compulab) are making the boards themselves since they are SBC builders. In quantity they probably could get close to these final prices by OEMing the boards and sticking them in project cases.

      This PC is actually a rebranding of the ENC-iGLX it seems. You can also buy just the innards from Compulab, too. If you don't mind XScale instead of Geode and can handle 312Mhz, they have a system with 1 ethernet and wifi for $199.

      Gumstix is much more interesting IMO, but this is a nice little box as far as PC compatibles go.

    42. Re:Compare it with... by urlgrey · · Score: 1

      For 24/7 operation a compact flash solution like on a Soekris box is better for this role.
      I've looked long and hard at the Soekris machines, but ultimately just kept putting off getting one for a variety of reasons--most of them admittedly pretty shoddy ones. :-)

      That said, I did just plonk down the cash for a Fit-PC. I'm hopeful that it will indeed live up to the expectations being set for it.

      As for it having a hard drive. Eh. Doesn't bother me. Flash RAM may not have moving parts, but it can and indeed does go bad. Parts--moving or not--failing is par for the course in most anything, even things with what most folks would consider "zero" technology. (Things like glue failing on a chair and falling on your rumpus.)

      --
      Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
    43. Re:Compare it with... by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Dude, get over it. No one (at least, no one technical enough to be on Slashdot) says that anymore. You may get one person making that claim (which, by the way, the great-grandparent post didn't), but you'll get ten people calling him or her wrong. Mac users need to get over their persecution complex.

      --
      Property is theft.
    44. Re:Compare it with... by chris.evans · · Score: 1

      TS-3300 pc/104 hardware 750ma.

      http://nxdos.sourceforge.net/

    45. Re:Compare it with... by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Does it come with OS/2, half an operating system?

    46. Re:Compare it with... by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

      You can put a IDE Flash disk into a Soekris net4801 too. I've done that. That saves the burden of installing on to a CF. I always have a DMZ on my networks so I need the 3rd network port. Plus I put a encryption accelerator card in the Soekris too. Their boxes have worked well for me. But, of course, YMMV.

  2. slashvertisement by sh3l1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    **cough** slashvertisement **cough**

    --
    Help Me! I'm trapped in the tubes! Oh noes! Here comes a internet!
    1. Re:slashvertisement by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      That hurts Rob's feelings when you say that. ;)

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:slashvertisement by bhima · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just curious but where's the line between unwanted advertisement and here's a new gadget you may be interested in.

      I do embedded stuff and I was interested for a few seconds...

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:slashvertisement by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Informative

      The line appears to be: if there's a chance anyone anywhere made a buck from something, it's gotta be evil.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:slashvertisement by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "**cough** slashvertisement **cough**"

      It's a strange coincidence that the things that geeks enjoy reading about are often products.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:slashvertisement by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      *rolls eyes* If anything in the slashdot comments can still hurt his feelings then he doesn't read them often enough.. in fact if anything on the internet can still hurt his feelings then he's just a pansy

    6. Re:slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cover your mouth. Actual thinking might be contagious.

      *cough*

    7. Re:slashvertisement by aliquis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aaah, that explains why Linux is so big here ;D

    8. Re:slashvertisement by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      **cough** slashvertisement **cough** This is the sort of place where one takes hardware; those who come here appreciate this. Cool bit of kit, cheap yet capable. Machines this small, versatile and low cost? You could make a garage door opener out of this. You could fly a UAV on 5W.

      Anyhow that's where you are and welcome. Just us hardware fiends. :)

      Happy Friday.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    9. Re:slashvertisement by Torvaun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm looking at the many potential possibilities for wearable computing, and this is a major thing for me. 5 watts means that batteries last forever, and that heat will be low. Small form factor means that it could easily be converted into something that you just take with you. Freedom of OS means that I can pick whatever will have the best drivers for the most peripherals.

      I'm all sorts of interested in this, especially with that kind of price point.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    10. Re:slashvertisement by GunFodder · · Score: 1

      That's easy. If I think it's cool then it's a worthwhile article. If I think it sucks then it's a slashvertisement. Any questions?

    11. Re:slashvertisement by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I was interested for a few seconds Care to expand on that. I looked at it and decided I could get cheaper Geode boards from other places, but without video, or something a lot more flexible for about the same price with video or whatever else I wanted on daughter boards. Oh, and Geodes are very boring CPUs. What were your reasons for ceasing to be interested after a few seconds?
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:slashvertisement by svx · · Score: 1

      "As of 13-Oct-07 fit-PC has been "slashdotted" (article on it published in Slashdot), so we observed unexpected demand peak. Currently we are out of stock. We expect to resume stock beginning of December '07. We apologize for the inconvenience." ..seems it worked..

  3. Fanless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Uses the case for cooling, huh?

    I wonder how it'd work if you wrapped it in plastic, stuck it in a bucket of ice, and overclocked it?

    1. Re:Fanless... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      The original ibooks did not have fans either.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:Fanless... by thaneross · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems to be overlooked by most people, but the fact that this little box is fanless means the laptop harddrive contains the only moving parts. I'm not sure if it would be a good idea, but this might be a good candidate for a cheap air tight sealed industrial-environment box.

    3. Re:Fanless... by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

      Fact of the matter is, it's made with an embedded processor, and likely the rest of the architecture is straight out of the embedded PC market. First thing I thought when I saw it: Linux gateway router ;)

    4. Re:Fanless... by cabazorro · · Score: 1

      I had a fanless PC once. It was the egg-shaped i-mac.
      I could hear my own breath while running i-tunes.
      Yet, I would cringe with exasperation at the sound of the
      hard 8Gig drive spinning-up and down..wrrrr! bzzzt wrrrrr!
      In regard of the fit-pc:
      What was so hard about putting a slot for an SD CARD?
      Sell the box without HD and add an option for an SD card
      loaded with your favorite distro.
      wrrrrrr!

      --
      - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  4. Lame by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1, Informative

    No flash. Fewer USB ports than the XO-1. Lame.

    (And Gentoo? WTF!?)

    1. Re:Lame by Aladrin · · Score: 2

      Apparently they were confused about the Gentoo... TFA says it actually shipped with Ubuntu instead. Probably a good idea since Gentoo peeps would probably rather customize it from the start anyhow, and Ubuntu is easier for the less techie of us.

      I had been wondering when a tiny computer with 2 ethernet ports and decent CPU would come out... Too bad I've not got a router I really like and no real reason to mess with it now.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Lame by ericrost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I sure would like an extra ethernet port on it, though. Would make a GREAT 3 homed firewall box so I can use the box I've got as my router/firewall/dns/dhcp server for something real (it is, after all a low end first gen p4, it could server SOMETHING).

    3. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Could there be a worst choice of OS for this computer to run?

    4. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure would like an extra ethernet port on it, though. Would make a GREAT 3 homed firewall box so I can use the box I've got as my router/firewall/dns/dhcp server for something real (it is, after all a low end first gen p4, it could server SOMETHING). Why not just pick up something can can run OpenWRT?
    5. Re:Lame by value_added · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had been wondering when a tiny computer with 2 ethernet ports and decent CPU would come out.

      Some years ago? The only advantage I see to this unit is that it's black (instead of green), and it offers video output, none of which may or not be useful or appropriate.

      That said, it's good to see other product offerings in the market.

    6. Re:Lame by gradedcheese · · Score: 1

      It has two ports. You can have more with USB dongles (I've had pretty good luck with Linksys USB Ethernet interfaces, though make sure you get the USB 2.0 versions, some stores still have the slower models around).

    7. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Could there be a worst choice of OS for this computer to run?


      BeOS.
    8. Re:Lame by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the benchmarks on that box? 26 Mbit/s, which was achieved by downloading a large file from the other machine onto /dev/null on the net4801. TWENTY SIX MEGABITS. Are we living in 1996? That's the kind of performance I would expect out of a $10 router from frys, not a $200 router running linux.
      I was looking for a router to put in front of a colo server, as much as I like the idea of the Soekris board, performance like that is pretty much a joke.

    9. Re:Lame by julesh · · Score: 1

      Why not just pick up something can can run OpenWRT?

      Because there are a lot of applications that this box will fit that most OpenWRT devices couldn't handle. Print server. Non-secure file server. Public-facing web server. There's no reason not to combine these applications with your router, except that most dedicated devices don't have the hardware required for them.

    10. Re:Lame by EvanED · · Score: 2, Funny

      Windows Vista?

      (C'mon Slashdot, it falls to me, by /. standards a MS fanboy (though not really), to make an anti-MS joke about Vista HW requirements? Clearly this site has peaked. ;-))

    11. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really believe that spending near 300 dollars on a router/firewall/dns/dhcp is a sane idea?

    12. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However an OpenWRT capable router, is more than sufficient for a "router/firewall/dns/dhcp server", which is what it was suggested as an option for. In addition if you got one that had USB, it would probably be fine as a file/print server as well, though a public facing web server might be too much for it.

    13. Re:Lame by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you want a firewall, why not pick up something like this from PC Engines (or its successor, the ALIX, with the same processor in TFA), or one of the Soekris equivalent, with up to four network adaptors. Both of these have a miniPCI slot which can take a crypto accelerator for offloading VPN stuff from the CPU, and both are very well supported by OpenBSD.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    14. Re:Lame by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You'd be a fool to run Linux on one of these machines. The OpenBSD guys were getting 29Mb/s and with the latest optimisations to pf are now getting 58Mb/s. Not quite fast enough to saturate a wired LAN, but fast enough for most Internet connections. Add in a crypto miniPCI card and you can offload VPN calculations too.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Lame by rasputin465 · · Score: 1

      And who the hell uses rs-232 anymore??

    16. Re:Lame by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Lots of people, when you need to get a console on a box that isn't reachable from the network. What, you want to lug a keyboard and monitor out into the field? A laptop and a serial cable are all you need.

  5. hmmm by deftones_325 · · Score: 0

    Give it Wi-Fi, and i'd buy one. Maybe for just checking email or looking at porn, and other school-related stuff.

    --
    "A gentleman never strikes a lady with his hat on." - Fred Allen
    1. Re:hmmm by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      It's already got USB. All you need is a tiny USB wifi adapter and you're all set.

    2. Re:hmmm by courseofhumanevents · · Score: 1

      Maybe for just checking email or looking at porn, and other school-related stuff. Wow, what school do you go to?
  6. For router use by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    it needs at least one gigabit port.

    1. Re:For router use by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Informative

      it needs at least one gigabit port.

      Why? What Internet connection do you have that would come close to maxing out even a 10Mb connection? How many hundreds of machines do you have on your home network that would requires a Gigabit on the inside port?

      PCs come with Gigabit Ethernet connections these days because the cost difference is negligible. Having two 100MB ports provides more than enough bandwidth for average home use and may save some power which is the point of this machine.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:For router use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get 300mbit lines here. Still twice the price of usual DSL lines (1 to 16mbits), but a few years down the road such a line will cost the same and the availability will be equally high. Having to replace the hardware, because they wanted to save 5 cents is a bit sad.

    3. Re:For router use by thisissilly · · Score: 1
      it needs at least one gigabit port.

      Why?

      LAN connections, not Internet. It only has a 40GB internal disk, so you might want to use one network port for iSCSI, ATAoE, or even plain old NFS.

    4. Re:For router use by gnuman99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It only has a 40GB internal disk, so you might want to use one network port for iSCSI, ATAoE, or even plain old NFS


      Huh!? So, you are going to get a 5W box so you can hook it up to your 16-disk SAN and save on power?
    5. Re:For router use by joshuac · · Score: 1

      Why? What Internet connection do you have that would come close to maxing out even a 10Mb connection?

      I have a 15Mb DSL circuit.

      You insensitive clod.
    6. Re:For router use by thisissilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not, if someone was going to run a lab or cafe full of them?

    7. Re:For router use by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Even then, you wouldn't need GigE, you'd just need 100Mb/s ethernet from each terminal to the switch and an 8-port switch with gigabit uplink going to the SAN.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:For router use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, duh. You use this thing as a hardware firewall with BSD slapped on it. One of the 2 ethernet ports is for internal 1 gbit LAN (connected to switch) because you have a NAS and a desktop there. The NAS has all your DVDs ripped, but fools on Slashdot are not able to imagine such setups.

      And no, ofcourse usually you don't saturate your 1 gbit LAN but if the difference is 30 MB/sec versus = 12 MB/sec I'd know what to pick. For not much more (1 gbit switch 5-port 50 EUR here). Problem is, this lil machine doesn't play along well with this scheme, and parent pointed that out.

      Btw, my NAS is very low power. It total it eats about 120W. If I can save about 30-40W w/hardware firewall instead of using an Athlon or Core Duo, yeah that'd be really sweet. Got it? Good.

    9. Re:For router use by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      Why? What Internet connection do you have that would come close to maxing out even a 10Mb connection? How many hundreds of machines do you have on your home network that would requires a Gigabit on the inside port?

      I have a subnet on my home network that I use for the media servers, players and editors. I frequently copy around multi-gigabyte files. So the gigabit bandwidth is rather well utilized.

      I also need a way for that subnet to access other subnets on my home network. Hence a gigabit port on a router.

      I'm just providing them some marketing feedback - if they want me to buy their product, I need a gigabit port. From what you are saying, they've no intention of supporting my requirements, so then I'll just move to a vendor that does.

    10. Re:For router use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except if you're using this thing as a firewall, chances are good that your NAS and your client machines would both be on the same interface. Just get a gigabit switch and plug everything into that. Then, you have gigabit inside your LAN and 100 Mbit to your firewall and the outside world.

      You *do* realize that not everything on a switch has to run at the same speed, right? That that is what makes it a switch instead of a hub, right?

  7. 5 watts is good, can be better by recharged95 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wow, add a couple of solar panels

    and you could have a lightweight VOIP phone that runs forever. Sweet. Solar power computer FTW!

    1. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by megaditto · · Score: 0

      Five watts spec is bullshit. The two USB ports alone will require 5 W, (500 mA each @ 5 V). Now add another 10 for the CPU, 5-10 for the HDD, 5+ for the RAM and entourage chips, multiply all that by two (or more if the PSU efficiency is low), and you get nowhere hear the 5 W it will consume...

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by mrcgran · · Score: 1

      since low power seems to be the main feature, I wonder why they are using a HDD instead of a flash memory.

    3. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've worked with these Geode-based 'miniboxes' during my day job for the past year or so. Max power draw is more than 5W, but it's not as bad as you make it. The Geode's TDP is 3.5W IIRC, though in average (i.e. not encoding video) use it's more like 1.0-1.5W. The HDD draws ~2.5W while seeking, but 1W while it's idle. The RAM + other goodies on the motherboard are ~1.5W. Even if you plugged in 5W of USB devices you'd still be looking at a total power draw of 10W under all but the heaviest loads. Measured at the wall it's a little higher due to PSU efficiency, but nowhere near the 2x factor you claim - more like 30%.

    4. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why? Has flash reduced its power requirements recently?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      A USB port consumes 5W when nothing is plugged into it?

    6. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by Garridan · · Score: 1

      No it's not. The spec is for the power supply. If you plug in two USB devices which draw 5W, the power supply will give all it can, and probably push up to 10W before it lets out the magic blue smoke, or blows a fuse, depending on the intelligence of the designers.

    7. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by mutende · · Score: 1

      Five watts spec is bullshit.
      A Danish linux guy, Peter Toft, actually tested this one month ago and found that it uses 10 W during bootup and just over 6 W once it's up and running. PTO's previous articles about the Fit-PC can be found here, here and here (all in Danish).
      --
      Unselfish actions pay back better
    8. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by mrcgran · · Score: 2, Informative

      flash (ssds) uses less power than harddisks. you don't need to spin flash memories while you are not reading them, or move other mechanical parts while reading. see e.g. http://www.sandisk.com/Corporate/PressRoom/PressReleases/PressRelease.aspx?ID=3732 "Power efficiency. SanDisk SSDs have minimal power requirements, with savings rated at over 50 percent compared with a hard disk drive -- 0.9 watts during active operation versus 1.9 watts7."

    9. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by gayleard · · Score: 1

      What hard disk is this?
      I haven't seen one that uses less than 5 watts.

    10. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      I *think* this may be the drive.

      Flip to page 13 and read along with me:

      • Start up: 4.5W
      • Idle: 0.65W
      • Low Power Active: 1.65W
      • Seek: 2.25W
      • Read / Write: 2W
      • Standby: 0.25W
      • Sleep: 0.1W

      The more you know!

      --Joe
    11. Re:5 watts is good, can be better by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1
      2.5" drives which are used in laptops, a quick google revealed this: http://www.storagereview.com/2005notebook.sr?page=0%2C6

      At idle, all tested drives consume less than 1 watt of power. The Momentus 7200.1 dissipates the most at 0.94 watts while the Travelstar 5K100 carves out a niche of its own through dissipating just 0.47 watts. Under a full-bore seek, however, the 5K100 ties Fujitsu's MHT, consuming a relatively hefty 3.2 watts. The 7200 RPM pair follow up, both dissipating 3.0 watts while seeking. The WD Scorpio and Samsung SpinPoint top the charts, consuming just 2.5 and 2.6 watts respectively. Oh and that review was 2 years ago.
  8. That website is...... by budword · · Score: 1

    That website is hideous....whoever designed it should be fired. I am interested in buying it, but I don't even want to hit the button to see the next page.....can't we have a link to an all in one print page ?

    1. Re:That website is...... by piranha(jpl) · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're not interested in the current layout, where 1.5 pages of content (printed) is expanded across four separate web pages, with a layout/ads/bullshit to content ratio of about 5, try the printable version—the web's best kept secret.

  9. It can play Quake, I'm sold. :) by necro2607 · · Score: 1

    Heh! "the fit-PC has very little horsepower, which makes it apt for web browsing and light applications; today's games need not apply."

    Today's games? Pff.. It'll run Quake! Good enough for me. ;) Hell, why not buy a ton of 'em and start the next monthly/bi-monthly/whatever Quake 1 LAN in your area? That would be pretty damn cool IMO.

    But then again maybe I'm the only one who considers an install of Quake 1 a required part of installing a fresh copy of any OS... ;)

    1. Re:It can play Quake, I'm sold. :) by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I have a similar outlook, but I go for an even older product: Duke Nukem 3D, Atomic Edition. And Shadow Warrior. Jonof's Windows ports of those games are remarkable.

      Not that I didn't put in my time on Quake too.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:It can play Quake, I'm sold. :) by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Ohhh Quake.... :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:It can play Quake, I'm sold. :) by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I played Quake at the first LAN party I went to. My machine was the fastest in the room (although someone else had a 3dfx card), and had a Cyrix P166+ (133MHz) and 32MB of RAM. It ran DOS quake pretty well, at above the minimum resolution. This machine has a CPU four times the speed and has eight times as much RAM. If it can't handle Quake, Linux is even more bloated than I thought...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. Seen the Koolu? by myalias · · Score: 1

    This architecture is becoming familar. The Koolu is $200 to $300, is a bit more mature (its expandable) and comes from Canada. This architecture makes for a great system as, for instance, a home web, file, and VOIP server. The AMD Geode has a great GPU, but a significant web app (especially with lots of animation) will severely tax the CPU's horsepower.

    1. Re:Seen the Koolu? by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      The AMD Geode has a great GPU, but a significant web app (especially with lots of animation) will severely tax the CPU's horsepower.

      I feel you on that one. My laptop has a 64-bit processor at 1600Mhz, a 3D video chipset and 1.25GB of RAM, and under Linux it's very sluggish on a media-rich page.
  11. No point in this. Get a laptop! by linuxguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My core 2 Duo based laptop with 2 GBs of RAM eats 18 watts with *screen turned on*!

    Laptops are really really cheap these days. I bought an Acer laptop for a family member, brand new from CompUSA, last month for $350 (It has an Intel CPU I forget which one). It will probably run circles around this thing and costs about the same (once you include the $40 shipping cost on fit PC) and consumes little additional power.

    What is the point of this fit PC again?

  12. Yes, your posting is indeed lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you are truely clueless. This isn't a competitor with the XO-1. The is a competitor for the Soekris board (re: http://soekris.com./

    The price is right in line with Soekris' new top-end system, though a little underpowered. But it does have a video display.

    The real question is whether this new system supports serial console in the BIOS. That's a big plus for the Soekris board. These types of boxes are perfect for secure servers for small outfits.

    With OpenBSD, Soekris has been the best firewall around. I also have one as a mail server, running all the RBL add-ons to Postfix, along with spamassasin and recently I added domainkeys. Next up is DKIM.

    My Soekris box is a little underpowered at 266 MHz. But this mailserver has been SUPERB for my own needs. I get a couple thousand email messages per day, plus about 1000 SPAM attempts per day. Almost no SPAM gets though, and what little does is about to be tuned out.

    I'm thinking about upgrading to the newest Soekris board, which should provide more than ample horsepower for my site. The box that this article is about may be a contender; it's certainly competition.

    The big question will be whether it provides a serial console.

    But no, the market here isn't the XO-1, or your normal PC supercomputer. It's for small footprint embedded systems.

    1. Re:Yes, your posting is indeed lame. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      I understood that perfectly, however, it is still interesting to compare the two. They share quite a bit of hardware, even though they are for completely different applications. The processors differ by a speed grade, and they have the same amount of RAM. Where the XO-1 has wifi, the fit-pc has 2 ethernet ports. I'd guess the wifi probably costs a bit more. The XO-1 has 1Gb flash, whereas the fit-pc has a 40Gb hard drive. Again, I'd wager the flash is a bit more expensive than the hard drive. And when you add in the display and other components of the XO-1, it really makes the tiny-pc look over-priced. Also, is seems silly for the fit-pc to have an analog video output instead of digital.

    2. Re:Yes, your posting is indeed lame. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Remember, the XO-1 is always discussed at wholesale prices, while the Fit-PC is discussed at retail.

  13. Hello? Dectop? by tommy_traceroute · · Score: 1

    This is a joke.

    Go out and get a Dectop for less than half the price. Slightly weaker specs, and doesn't come pre-loaded, but does come with a keyboard and mouse. My Dectop is now functioning very nicely as a low-volume, silent (replaced the hd with a CF card & adapter), 5-watt LAMP web server.

    And the Dectop looks better, too, IMHO.

    --
    o 1 Sig beneath your current threshold
  14. I'm Depressed by Dog135 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man I'm depressed now. This thing has higher specs then my laptop!

    True, my laptop's 5 years old. But STILL! I'm now in the process of trying to talk my wife into letting me upgrade.

    BTW: yes, works great for going online and writing non-graphical programs. (web sites, CLI) But useless for most action games. Tomb Raider plays fine on it though.

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
    1. Re:I'm Depressed by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      That's really getting at the big lie of the computer industry. Do most people really need an ub3r l33t dual core, 2GB RAM, 200GB HDD laptop to do basic sh*t?
      Personally, I'd be ecstatic if someone made a machine with a low-end Celly M, ~60GB 5400rpm drive, 12.1" screen (probably 1024x768), DVD burner (reader is fine) and GeForce 7100 for ~$350-400.

    2. Re:I'm Depressed by olden · · Score: 1

      May your wish come true: PC+LCD for $450 - $50 rebate. 1GB DDR2, 120GB HD, DVD-RW, kbd/mouse, 17" monitor...
      It even comes with Vista, so for a really sweet deal you "just" need to manage to get some money back from M$ by returning the OS. :)

    3. Re:I'm Depressed by hawk · · Score: 1

      >I'm now in the process of trying to talk my wife into letting me upgrade.

      The wife, or the upgrade?

      hawk, whistling innocently

    4. Re:I'm Depressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? My 5-year-old laptop (Dell C840) has a 2.2 Ghz Pentium 4, 1 GB RAM, nVidia graphics on a 15" display that does 1600x1200. It's also 5 years old. Hell, it's still my primary development system when I travel.

      You just bought a piece of shit, that's all. A piece of shit will always be a piece of shit no matter how old it is.

    5. Re:I'm Depressed by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      I think GP may have been pining for a laptop, not a desktop.

  15. This does point in the right direction by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    Given it's stuck at 256MB RAM - which is sad. It's got a few other downsides like probably some bottleneck somewhere beween IO and the CPU. But it only draws 5 Watts and needs no active cooling which is really cool. Considering that this is a small company and they manage to offer their micropc for such a low price it is a really interesting device. 5 Watts ... my Eco-Bulb in my desklamp uses 7. Quite awesome actually.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  16. Similar to XO-1 (OLPC) by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

    The XO-1laptop, which also uses the Geode processor and draws 2-3W when running apparently - this system makes a nice desktop equivalent. Since often the screen on a laptop is the biggest power drain of the system, it would be nice to see a low-power screen available to go with it.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  17. Fantastic for solar setups by inflex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This would be great for a lot of situations where you're using solar power to manage devices and want a WWW frontend or such. Could run this on a 10W ($100) panel without too much trouble.

    1. Re:Fantastic for solar setups by tftp · · Score: 1

      http://www.embeddedarm.com/ is far cooler and cheaper for such use.

    2. Re:Fantastic for solar setups by GuidoW · · Score: 1

      Could run this on a 10W ($100) panel without too much trouble.

      More like 50W worth of solar panels and a good pack of batteries. Unless you only want the thing to be accessible during the day and when the weather's fair so the panels give at least 50% of their maximum output.

      --
      If it's so secret, then how come I've never heard of it?
    3. Re:Fantastic for solar setups by emj · · Score: 1

      They cost about about the same, abit cheaper and no HD. They are alot cooler though SD slots and all.

    4. Re:Fantastic for solar setups by emj · · Score: 1

      but only one of the ARM boards actually has VGA, but za href="http://www.embeddedarm.com/epc/ts7300-spec-h.htm">booting linux in 1.69s makes it all ok.. ;-)

    5. Re:Fantastic for solar setups by tftp · · Score: 1

      Well, inflex was asking about "using solar power to manage devices and want a WWW frontend or such" and VGA is totally and absolutely counter-indicated if you do this. In practice you need only /dev/ttyS0 and eth0, and most boards have at least that (usually more.) I never had any of their boards with VGA (I use TS7250) and I never even considered asking for VGA. I use the boards for some fast processes (real time, actually, using PC/104 to talk to custom hardware) and I don't want to spend any CPU cycles on GUI. Especially when you are running on solar power.

    6. Re:Fantastic for solar setups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... until the sun went down...

  18. Imagine... by EvilBrak89 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine a whole Beowulf cluster of these!

    1. Re:Imagine... by hasbeard · · Score: 1

      That would defeat the purpose wouldn't it? ;)

    2. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But will run Linux?

    3. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean like this:- http://ainkaboot.co.uk/octimod.php

      MPHC-500 and MPHC-750
        Two Seagate Barracuda hard disk drives with a 500GB or 750GB capacity per drive, running at 7,200rpm.
        Capacities of drives available change rapidly if the capacity you desire is available we can provide a module with the drives in.
        A full populated 42U cabinet could have 144 motherboards or 144 hard drives, 74TB of storage (using 500G HDD), or a trade off between the two. Additionally because of the modular nature of Octimod upgrading or replacing compunents is simple.

    4. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jebus, this wasn't all that funny 5 years ago ... get some new damn material.

    5. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, hey! Some of us have never heard it! I thought it was rather clever, myself ;)

  19. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This machine runs quieter and cooler than your laptops, for one.

    Whether that's worth the price/performance difference depends on the buyer.

    It would also be more suited to running as a light-duty server or networking device than a laptop would.

  20. mobile-itx and pico-itx are better IMHO by josepha48 · · Score: 2, Informative

    while they may not be as small as this, they offer more flexibility as 256M RAM is not really going to run Win XP very well is it?

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

    1. Re:mobile-itx and pico-itx are better IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      while they may not be as small as this, they offer more flexibility as 256M RAM is not really going to run Win XP very well is it?


      It's not supposed to run XP, Vistaboy.

    2. Re:mobile-itx and pico-itx are better IMHO by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      Meet nLite! ;) http://www.nliteos.com/

    3. Re:mobile-itx and pico-itx are better IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran XP with 256 MB of RAM for about four years and loved it- until I replaced my laptop this summer. XP on 1 GB of RAM is very sweet.

    4. Re:mobile-itx and pico-itx are better IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the ebox:
      http://www.wdlsystems.com/downloads/specs/1EBX453_s.pdf

      VIA Eden Esther 1.2GHz (Fanless)
      512MB DDR2 onboard
      PXE diskless boot
      MPEG4/ WMV9 decoding accelerator
      2 x USB 2.0 ports (one at front)
      Printer Port (!!!!)
      Compact Flash Slot
      Mini PCI socket
      Dual LAN,
      1 x RS232
      Supported 2.5" HDD
      Supported Wireless LAN (Option)

      170 x 123 x 56 mm,
      ~20W power
      ~$300

      I have an older model (800MHz), and it works great.

    5. Re:mobile-itx and pico-itx are better IMHO by josepha48 · · Score: 1
      About a month ago I got a Intel D201GLY MB (US $79) and 1G RAM for US $24, with a case (US $62). I added a hard drive for about US $40 and for about US $200 I got a nice little machine. It has a Celeron 1.3Ghz CPU ( with fan ), 1 LAN, 6 USB, 1 IDE for 2 drives, 1 RS232, and a bunch of other things I don't even use :-). Mini-itx is an awesome form factor. VIA is also releasing mobile-itx form factor design which is the size of a Motorola razr with all the features of a mini-itx.

      I'd say in 5 years or less, the iMac style display will be standard as a desktop/mobile computer. You would buy a desktop and be able to unhook it from the stand and then use the display as a touch screen.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!
      Does slashdot hate my posts?

  21. PicoTux = Smallest PC in the World by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FitPC has nothing on these guys! http://www.picotux.com/

    Adeptus

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    1. Re:PicoTux = Smallest PC in the World by afroborg · · Score: 1

      Though it's not really comparing apples with apples...

      Still, I can see uses for both products already... might have to get me some to play with

      --
      my sig could kick your sig's arse...
    2. Re:PicoTux = Smallest PC in the World by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a seriously awesome device! And it has enough RAM to actually do something useful with it. Thanks for the pointer!

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  22. Not that slow. by Entropius · · Score: 1

    500 MHz?

    Not sure how the Geode stacks up to the Athlon 64 clock-for-clock, but I have an Athlon 64 laptop with frequency scaling; it throttles down to 800 MHz to save power when not under load?

    Guess what?

    800 MHz is enough for practically everything.

    1. Re:Not that slow. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Informative

      800Mhz is plenty when you have (relatively) huge caches and fast RAM, as well as the headroom of being able to triple your speed on demand. Have you tried actually limiting the Athlon to 800Mhz? You'll start noticing some really long pauses, especially if you take out all but one of your RAM modules. With a 500Mhz P3 and more 384Mb RAM, Firefox is sluggish even on simple web sites.

    2. Re:Not that slow. by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Yes. The computer autolimits to 800MHz on battery. I've never run that system with under 512MB RAM, so I can't speak to the RAM limitation, but Firefox is just fine on an A64@800.

      If you've got memory constraints, I would think Opera would be a better browser anyway.

  23. SOHO or Small Business Linux Appliances?? by oakleeman · · Score: 1

    On first impression this might be just what I've been looking for to sell as remote sensors to go with EasyIDS. I've been trying to find something with a small physical footprint for less than $350 for quite a while. Granted it doesn't have any Gb nics but chances are someone that is sniffing that much traffic is going to be using a commercial product anyways.

    Might also be able to use it for Endian Firewall or Proxmox ....maybe even for a proxy server?

  24. WTF? by Annymouse+Cowherd · · Score: 1

    gentoo on this? Imagine updating your kernel :shudder:

    1. Re:WTF? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Compiling a kernel wouldn't be too bad on the fit-pc. It can be done in under 30min on a pc with half the performance. However, given the lack of RAM and how slow the hard drive is, building glibc and gcc would take days, and things like GNOME and KDE would be worse than most slashdotters would joke about.

    2. Re:WTF? by Annymouse+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      What kind of PC crack did the gentoo people invent? it took me all night to build a kernel on my debian box.

    3. Re:WTF? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      Well, admittedly, the last time I compiled a recent kernel on a really old pc, it was without X running and on a non-preemptible kernel, with two swap drives. How bad was that debian box?

    4. Re:WTF? by Annymouse+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      Sempron @1.8Ghz, 512mb ddr400. X was running, it was a 2.6 kernel. I must've done something to f-up the build process (though all i remember doing is apt-get source -b linux-image-xyz)

    5. Re:WTF? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

      You did something very wrong, modern laptops can build a kernel in under 5 minutes:

      neil@t60-n ~ $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep CPU
      model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7400 @ 2.16GHz
      model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7400 @ 2.16GHz
      neil@t60-n ~ $ wget -q http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.23.1.tar.bz2
      neil@t60-n ~ $ tar xjf linux-2.6.23.1.tar.bz2
      neil@t60-n ~ $ cd linux-2.6.23.1
      neil@t60-n ~/linux-2.6.23.1 $ zcat </proc/config.gz >.config
      neil@t60-n ~/linux-2.6.23.1 $ yes "" | make oldconfig >/dev/null
      neil@t60-n ~/linux-2.6.23.1 $ time make -j3 bzImage &>/dev/null

      real 2m15.341s
      user 4m0.524s
      sys 0m22.742s
      neil@t60-n ~/linux-2.6.23.1 $ time make -j3 modules &>/dev/null

      real 1m9.564s
      user 2m4.329s
      sys 0m12.383s
      neil@t60-n ~/linux-2.6.23.1 $
    6. Re:WTF? by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      A full KDE installation from format took about a week on my 300MHz P1. Still short of a lot of /. jokes.

      Now, I've set up distcc, so it compiles on my main desktop. It took less than a day to install everything (however, less was installed).

      NB: I don't use Firefox or OO.o, which would add a few weeks to install time. But, that's what binary packages are for.

    7. Re:WTF? by eklitzke · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding me. About a year ago I tried installing Gentoo on a P166 just for giggles and kicks. Even though the kernel was really stripped down (really, nothing that I didn't need) it still took at least four or five hours to build the kernel. Things have been like this for a long time. Remember when it took a full day to build a kernel? That was on systems not too much weaker than this, when the kernel was much, much smaller than it is now.

      --
      #include ".signature"
    8. Re:WTF? by ModMeFlamebait · · Score: 1

      What kind of PC crack did the gentoo people invent? it took me all night to build a kernel on my debian box.
      You may have compiled a whole family of kernels (e.g. i386, i686, i686-smp, athlon, athlon-mp, wtf, etc.) -- you'd have to check the debian/rules file or google around, but it seems like it. Sub-5-minute kernel build times aren't really possible with cold cache (untarring the tree right before compiling makes the kernel source already available in page cache, so the sibling poster's machine had it easy). Anyway, a night to build a *single* kernel image, even with `make allmodconfig` is way overboard. What would the machine be? A Pentium-75?
      --
      Pavlov. Does this name ring a bell?
    9. Re:WTF? by lahi · · Score: 1

      It took less than a day to install everything (however, less was installed).


      I am really having a hard time parsing that sentence. Are you saying you installed only "less", or are you saying you installed everything except "less" (because it was installed already), or are you saying you could have installed everything in less than a day, but you didn't need everything, so you installed less than anything (presumably in less than "less than a day", whatever that was)?

      And if you answer "more or less", I'll page you!

      -Lasse
    10. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why modern kernels come with a .config. Turn off everything you don't need/have
      and you should be down to single digit minutes.

    11. Re:WTF? by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      I reinstalled everything. It took about a day to do so. When I reinstalled, I used the split ebuilds. I think it was just Konqueror, konsole, kdegames, kcontrol, and all the dependencies (including QT). There were probably some more apps.

      so, yeah more or less.

  25. First post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from a fit-PC!

  26. Re:Hello? Dectop? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

    Slightly weaker specs, and doesn't come pre-loaded, but does come with a keyboard and mouse.

    But doesn't come with an Ethernet port.

    I have keyboards and mice floating around, and don't need them for a NAS box or a router.

    It's a nice box and all - I have a PIC, which is the first generation of the Dectop, have to boot it off a USB thumbdrive to get it running Linux. But the fit-PC has some points in its favor.

    Depends on what you want it for. Hey, choice, what a concept.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  27. sounds like a mini-ITX by m2943 · · Score: 1

    See here.

  28. Re:Hello? Dectop? by couchslug · · Score: 1

    It's worth pointing out that the Dectop appears to be a recased derivative of the AMD PIC.

    Read the reviews before buying to get an idea if it's a good fit, even though it IS cheap.

    http://store.dataevolution.com/ReviewsList.asp?ProductCode=DT-7001&Reviews=Y

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  29. Thanks ExtremeTech... not. by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

    Way to write an article about a 5W system and then forgetting to tell us the expected battery life.

    1. Re:Thanks ExtremeTech... not. by _Hellfire_ · · Score: 1

      Way to write an article about a 5W system and then forgetting to tell us the expected battery life.

      It doesn't use a battery. The package comes with an AC adapter

      --
      "And then I visited Wikipedia ...and the next 8 hours are a blur..."
    2. Re:Thanks ExtremeTech... not. by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      Oh.

      Then... Thanks ExtremeTech! ;)

  30. But will it run ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... Vista?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  31. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree. I bought a $CDN 450 laptop a couple months ago. Loaded Mandriva on it and it runs very snappy. When I'm running under a regular load it consumes about 20 watts. That's for a 1.6 GHz P IV Celeron, with an Intel 950 GMA. Much more useful than what you get with this fit PC. Plus you can bring a laptop with you, and use it at the coffee shop and such. I don't imagine you can do the same with this one.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  32. Greener? by das_magpie · · Score: 1

    I cannot see how this computer would be all that much greener in the long run. Lets face it what is an extra 5-10 watts to have a faster machine, I cannot see that extra 5 watts making a massive difference to the environment, plus I am sure if you wanted to run you're box off the sun the extra $100 for another panel that supplies 5 watts is not going to kill you. I am all for low power greener machines but I think you need to still make more usable machines that are going to keep up with technology slightly better so that the machines themselves do not become junk.

    1. Re:Greener? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      I cannot see how this computer would be all that much greener in the long run

      Making "green" appliances isn't the answer. Electricity itself is inherently green; it's where we GET the electricity that sometimes causes problems.

  33. Weird comparison by feranick · · Score: 1

    I am curious to see how you can use this tiny PC as a phone, or at least how in the world you can use it by carrying around like a phone. You don;t seem to realize that with that PC you also need to carry around a monitor, a keyboard and mouse.

    1. Re:Weird comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was suggesting that you could use the iTouch as a limited-use PC, not the tiny PC as a phone.

    2. Re:Weird comparison by feranick · · Score: 1

      Very Limited indeed. With the PC you can edit documents, add applications, "copy and paste". Things (among many others) you can't do with the Apples. The iPhone/iPod touch aren't really proper computers just for this reason. So again, why comparing those things together? I still don't get the comparison.

  34. Re:forget today's games by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, yes, because it is a lightweight PC. If you bother to read the article, you'll see that the company provides Windows drivers and you can indeed install Windows on it. The point of the device is not gaming though, it's light internet use or any of a dozen other things small-form-factor computers are good for.

    And yes, I know you were trolling, but I can never resist feeding them these days.

  35. m0n0wall candidate by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

    Might be a good candidate for m0n0wall w/ dual NIC.

  36. Not $285; try $325. Go VIA instead... by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Another lovely company that tricks you with outrageous shipping costs to artificially drop the "price" of the computer. Also, check out the super friendly support and warranty policies.

    Do yourselves a favor and get a VIA-based mini-itx board for that kind of money.

    Seems you can get a VB7001G (1.5Ghz) for about $130; add in $30 for 512MB of ram (2x the fitPC), and however much you feel like spending on a compactflash card, USB memory key, or smaller laptop drive. Say, $50 for a 60GB drive (more than the fitPC's 40). $40 for a picoPSU; $30 for a AC adapter. Buy a crap case for $30 if you don't have one you can use already. Install a gigabit NIC for under $20 (dunno if there are any cheap dual-interface gigabit NICs.) That's under $310, and quite a bit more bang for the buck. It probably won't be 5w, but it'll be well under 20w given that board seems to use about 10w.

    If you want to go even cheaper, intel is fighting back against via, like with the D201GLY. It's $70, 1.3ghz celeron, DDR2 ram...

  37. You had me ... by KC1P · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... until I saw the shipping cost. $95?!

    Too bad, this thing would make an absolutely kickass DOS machine. (I'm serious! As long as the BIOS does USB/PS2 keyboard emulation.)

    1. Re:You had me ... by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 1

      http://www.fit-pc.com/shipping-cost.htm/ says that the shipping cost is $40 first unit in North America, $20 in Israel, $60 in Europe, and $80 in other locations, plus $10/15/5/20 per additional unit in the same categories.

      Where did you get $95 from?

    2. Re:You had me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not, just emulate it.

    3. Re:You had me ... by KC1P · · Score: 1

      >Where did you get $95 from?

      From Compulab's web site. I can't find who else sells these. Well $40 is better but not that much better.

  38. It's the Thin Client by Lisias · · Score: 0

    It's the thin client revisited. A very good, yet old, idea.

    HTML, CSS, POP3/SMTP/IMAP, JavaScript and, in some special cases, JRE and Flash it's all the vast majority of the people really need. Damit, it's almost 90% of my home computing usage in work days, and I'm a T.I. professional.

    I hope they manage to make it work this time.

    --
    Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
  39. I'm still waiting... by hcmtnbiker · · Score: 1

    This is i believe a nano-itx. There is also a pico-itx which is slightly smaller, draws less power, ect. But i'm actually more interested in a Mobile-ITX which should come out next year, but was demoed at Computex earlier this year. They boasted it could run windowsXP drawing only 0.5Watts.

    --
    If i had one dollar for every brain you dont have, i would have $1.
  40. application? by kaizokuace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    wonder how well this would do in a car install. Use a smaller lcd touchscreen, hook up a gps thingie and i guess you are set? This way you can find your way around town or watch porn and crash your car at the same time!

    --
    Balderdash!
    1. Re:application? by sabre307 · · Score: 1

      Glad to see someone else was thinking like this. I'm thinking I can pipe the audio output into an accessory input on the back of my head unit, come up with a DC converter for it, plug in a USB wireless adapter, and I've got one hell of a car PC that can store MP3s, download podcast, and read my email to me while I'm stuck in traffic. The low power consumption is a plus, but the 500mhz CPU is about as fast as most PDAs, so I don't see why it would have a problem running audio/video applications. Throw in a bluetooth USB adapter, and I can use my crackberry as a modem to access the internet while on the road. This could be the carputer I've been waiting for!

      --
      My software never has bugs.
      It just develops random features.
  41. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by Degrees · · Score: 1
    This device would actually make a decent firewall. Likely your laptop doesn't have two ethernet ports. And a WRT54 doesn't have a 40 GB hard drive for logging. Throw on SmoothWall or DansGuardian and you have a low power box that sits between the cable/DSL modem and your home network. Seems like a good fit to me. Another poster points out that it would be even better with three ethernet ports, for a DMZ. I don't know how much a WRT54 would cost if they added a 40 GB laptop drive, but I think this is probably near the same price range. Probably a little higher, but not unreasonably so.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  42. Fanless by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    To me, the slight differences in watt consumption aren't the point, for my uses anyway. What I want is a fanless PC. With ethernet and a decent soundcard, and a PII/500MHz or faster, 256MB RAM, and maybe 1GB Flash, and a USB slot. I don't even need VGA: machines for display should be faster and beefier. And of course it should run Linux.

    That gumstix looked cool. Are there more or better in its class, preferably under $150?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Fanless by dws90 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Zonbu

      That looks like it has most everything you want.

    2. Re:Fanless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zonbu costs $100 with a $12.95/month subscription for two years. This puts it over $400. Fugedaboutit.

    3. Re:Fanless by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      Zonbu.com? I prefer Zombo.com?

    4. Re:Fanless by repvik · · Score: 1

      Hilariously pointless ;)

    5. Re:Fanless by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks, that's a decent approximation. However, it costs $249 if you don't subscribe to their Internet service (their real business), or $338 if you subscribe and immediately cancel, while the service costs $13:mo for 2 years minimum (cancelable) prepaid.

      It's also kind of overkill for my app. It's got a bunch of SW preloaded, which has some kind of cost in installation/maintenance even if it's FOSS. It's got QXGA display, which I don't need, kbd/mouse ports (in addition to USB), and the 4GB Flash is costs about $30 (though power saving), which could probably buy a 40GB SATA HD - $15 buys 20GB SCSI HDs. Even the CF slot is probably a few extra unnecessary bucks.

      I bet that the $249 is full of not only profit, but also higher to balance the loss of profit from the network business. And the extra HW could be another $50-75. If this box, stripped down, could sell for $100-150, then it would be exactly what I want. As long as I can telnet into it and force it to install Linux from across the ethernet.

      Meanwhile, the Gumstix waysmall 200 is almost exactly what I want, for $129, but no soundchip. All the cheaper Gumstix have client-only USB, so can't take expansions. Though the $186 200xm-cf has CompactFlash, into which soundcards or CF/USB adapters can plug. And the waysmall 400m-bt has Bluetooth, which might send audio data to Bluetooth speakers or audio adapter, which could be even better, for only $200. But the audio module is $40, and the USB host module is $27, so $197 does get me all I want. Even if the extra $52 for the Zonbu gets a lot more (in a larger package). I wonder whether the Zonbu has 25% more processing power.

      Since Gumstix is so close, there's probably a competitor. My app is basically an "ethernet to stereo/5.1/7.1 audio" adapter, which has got to be a popular app (at least a . Probably there's one that has either soundchip or just USB host (for external DAC), with options for either ethernet or WiFi. For under $200, if not yet under $150.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  43. SBC in a box by Tiersten · · Score: 1

    Its just a small SBC in a box. You can see the place to fit the PC/104 connector. Nothing amazing...

    1. Re:SBC in a box by tuxicle · · Score: 1

      True. What puzzles me is that there are so many other SBCs out there with similar power consumption, but much more capable CPUs that aren't x86. Given they already took the plunge to put Linux on the thing, they could've gone further and used an ARM-based board instead.

      Example: http://www.embeddedarm.com/epc/ts7800-spec-h.htm

      Yes, I know it doesn't have onboard video or 2x Ethernet, but that 500 MHz ARM CPU would perform a lot better than a Geode.

    2. Re:SBC in a box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These things won't take off until they are x86 compatible. If you can't download the standard packages, most people won't do it. While I know that it is most likely that everything I might want to do on it can just be recompiled, and I know how to do that, it adds complecation and uncertainty. Look at x86_64, even; I have seen a lot of people complaining about video drivers not working in various 64bit linuxes.

  44. my Fit-PC experience by gradedcheese · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ooh, I have one of these, and it's kind of a mixed bag. The people who make them don't really seem to have enough Linux experience to really set this thing up so that it makes sense out of the box, definitely buy it only if you're planning to reinstall Linux on it.

    I expected at least a serial terminal out of the box so that I wouldn't have to plug in a display. It has an RS232 port (via RJ11 jack and adapter cable), and it is a semi-embedded little box. However they didn't enable it in /etc/inittab. Damn. On to Ethernet though, surely it ships with an ssh server running out of the box? Nope. On to plugging in a keyboard and display...

    It does come with Gentoo out of the box (not sure why they picked that distribution), with KDE (ugh) and some various other software. I used UNetbootin (http://lubi.sourceforge.net/unetbootin.html) to install Ubuntu via the network, because the BIOS that shipped on my Fit-PC didn't have working PXE boot (they've since fixed that). Afterward, I enabled the serial console and SSH server, configured the network interfaces, installed the applications I needed (SVN server) and stashed the Fit-PC somewhere and forgot about it, as I had originally intended.

    Overall, I like the Fit-PC, but I wish they had taken more care with the out-of-box experience and even the PC itself (the reset button, for example, is not exposed, and there's no soft-power way to shut the thing off since it has no other buttons). I do like the dual network interfaces, RS232, and low power and quiet operation, but there are tons of other similar Geode-based boxes out there, so this isn't too unique.

    Finally, the Geode is going away. I wonder what the next semi-embedded x86 chip of choice will be.

    1. Re:my Fit-PC experience by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Finally, the Geode is going away. I wonder what the next semi-embedded x86 chip of choice will be.

      Well the Geode GX/LX are indeed obsolete, basically being what AMD took over from National Semiconductor. The Geode NX is just an underclocked Athlon XP core. I think it is likely that we will see Geode done up with the low power 65nm Athlon64 core, underclocked of course.

      For embedded I think VIA is the way to go. Better performance/power and the prices are quite reasonable for OEMs. A company could likely design and build a Fit PC or decTOP clone with a VIA C7 for very little capital and push out a small fanless device that is under 10-watts.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:my Fit-PC experience by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I wonder what compiler options they used on the Gentoo distribution. There would be advantages to high optimizations for either speed or size in an application like this. Ubuntu would probably be the worst of both worlds, though it would have the advantage of not having to be recompiled (either slowly on that box or remotely.)

    3. Re:my Fit-PC experience by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Zonbu as was mentioned in an earlier thread is doing just that. They are using the VIA C7 Eden which is clocked at 1.2GHz and uses 7 watts. It uses compact flash rather than an HDD; however, a review of it I read says it still uses 17 watts of power during normal usage. I also just recently built a VIA C7 Eden build mini-ITX computer that has 1GB RAM and it's running Windows 2000 with a desktop HDD doing my torrenting and seeding. It maxes at 30 watts but hovers around 26 under normal usage.

      I am interested in seeing some numbers while using the new VIA processor that is rated at 1 watt at 1GHz. You should be able to get closer to the power usage of the Fit PC while killing it in performance.

  45. Asus Eee PC by PineHall · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Asus Eee PC is a sub-notebook with a better CPU and a minimum of 2GB of solid state disk space. Prices in the US start at $269.

    1. Re:Asus Eee PC by Bill+Wong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So far, the EEE has been nothing but vaporware...
      I don't believe it'll ever actually be sold at that pricepoint either (without at least needing to know a direct sales contact within Asus).

      I actually am interesting in purchasing a few dozen units, though...

    2. Re:Asus Eee PC by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, also the first version will supposedly have a fan, though a fanless version should be released in 2008. I'm not sure about the power consumption either, though I'm sure it isn't high.

      Still gonna buy one if the price doesn't rise too much...

  46. Re:Not $285; try $325. Go VIA instead... by hobbesx · · Score: 1

    Another lovely company that tricks you with outrageous shipping costs to artificially drop the "price" of the computer.


    I don't suppose you would have noticed that they're shipping from Israel? In which case, $40.00 isn't too bad.
    --
    This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
    Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  47. ... and the proof is here by aliquis · · Score: 4, Funny

    The line appears to be: if there's a chance anyone anywhere made a buck from something, it's gotta be evil.

    Aaah, that explains why Linux is so big here ;D

    And why sex is speaken of so rarely.
    1. Re:... and the proof is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to explain the popularity of pr0n, then?

    2. Re:... and the proof is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You pay for pr0n?

  48. Sightly weaker specs??? by IvyKing · · Score: 1
    No ethernet port, 2 USB 1.1 ports, less memory...


    Think the FitPC would be a much better fit to what I want in a small form factor X86 box for a bit less than what a similar Mini-ITX system goes for. The FitPC appears to consume less power than the lowest power Mini-ITX systems - should be able to get several hours of run-time off of a motorcycle battery.

    1. Re:Sightly weaker specs??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know it has no Ethernet port? According to the specs here

      https://store.dataevolution.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=DT-7001&Show=TechSpecs

      It does have an Ethernet port.

  49. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by timeOday · · Score: 1

    This device would actually make a decent firewall. Likely your laptop doesn't have two ethernet ports.
    For $10 is does.

    And if I just need to plug in my cable modem, I could save my $10 and use the USB connector.

  50. Games are a bad example. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    256 MB is a little weak.

    It's okay to say a low powered machine is fine for most people who don't run the latest games, but recently the grandma sixpack users have started to watch a lot more movies via broadband, and they have a ton of large images they sort from their digital cameras. We're past being able to say that running a Flash site on Firefox is enough. The machine can't bog when they're cropping and removing red-eye with the user-friendly imagine editors that came with their cameras.

    These days a basic computer has to be able to run OpenOffice smoothly, if you want a benchmark, because that oversized office suite is what people turn to when it's their turn to keep the books at the condo.

    That's probably important to emphasize: Most 'grandma sixpacks' are not /complete/ computer illiterates who'd like to email the kids, and maybe see the holiday pics. Today's retiree has had about 20 years of PCs being common in the workplace. For a lot of regular office staff, it starts 30 years back.

    1. Re:Games are a bad example. by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      my movie playing pc is running on 196 mb and xubuntu, runs ok. if anything i'd say the processor is a bit slow for movies though, my last attempt at a tv box was a 466 and i couldn't get it to play movies without choppyness, even when i went back to win95 with the fastest codecs i could find (admittedly with this config it was *almost* there).

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  51. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by IvyKing · · Score: 1

    Another poster points out that it would be even better with three ethernet ports, for a DMZ.


    Shouldn't be that hard to plug in a USB to ethernet adapter. If you really want three hard wired ethernet ports, you're probably better off getting a Soekris.
  52. Aleutia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There is a similar-looking computer that uses 1.8 watts called Aleutia.

  53. Re:Hello? Dectop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are just looking for a server etc. The Kurobox

    http://www.revogear.com/

    is the way to go. No unneeded peripherals like a video, sound, etc to generate heat and suck up power. Just an ethernet and USB port. Plus, it holds a standard 3.5" drive. I use mine as a Web Server for story photos with Gallery, DNS server, DHCP server, music server (for Slimdvices Squeezebox), Video server (for Hauppague Media MVP), Internet proxy and print server (with LPD and ghostscript) without any speed issues.

  54. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by Degrees · · Score: 1
    Well there you go - that was easy. And, you'd have a built in keyboard. At my house, the cable modem is sitting in the printer stand next to the ethernet switch. So for me, I'd just as soon have a small box sans LCD and keyboard. But sure, you make a good point that a laptop could be a fine firewall, cheap. And the built-in battery means a clean shutdown when the UPS signals the power has gone out.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  55. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

    The Core 2 Duo U2000 series are 1.06-1.20 GHz single-core CPUs that are rated at 5.5 watts TDP. That's a little more than the Geode, but the C2D U2000 will absolutely run circles around the K7 Tbred-based Geode. I'd think that a U2000 with a low-power chipset like the 945GMS (yes I know, terrible graphics compared to the AMD unit's...) would do a tad better.

    --
    Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  56. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Now that you mention it, a UPS is another separate thing you don't need if you use a laptop. It'll run for several hours with the lid closed and automatically suspend when the battery gets too low. Recently some goober at work blipped the power without warning anybody because he was installing some equipment, and everybody not on a laptop lost their work. (Granted they should have been using UPSs).

  57. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by TClevenger · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I picked up a Dell laptop with a broken screen for a song to replace a desktop that's on 24x7. Dropped in a 60GB drive, turned on noatime, and consumption is only 13W with the lid closed (12W once the drive spins down.) And that's at 1.2GHz; I can turn it down for even more savings if necessary.

  58. Useful by 6-tew · · Score: 1

    I'm writing this on a PIII-800MHz that I've had for a while. I didn't buy it new, I went out and found it, dirt cheap, to do basically what this Fit-PC is aiming to do. I'm running Fedora and mainly it's just for surfing, email and some BitTorrenting. As for gaming and such... Well obviously these are not the computers your looking for, move along. Still these lightweights are useful for this purpose, but it's a very narrow use. But then again, $285!

    Someone above mentioned the Mac Mini and that's a good point, but also it bears mentioning that these two systems are at very different price points. True they are both below $1000, which to me (being of a certain age) that seems super cheap, but $599 vs. $285, the Mac is over twice the money, and while it may be a better computer, it is not the most affordable. To me I think the trade-off in dollar/MHz would be invisible between the two given the purpose, the Mac's higher price reflects a more "complete" computer. Apple built down from the iMac to a price whereas this Fit-PC built up to theirs.

    Just a thought

  59. Not quite by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Competing against desktops and laptops that have 5 x the power for just another 100 or so, and it is difficult to justify this. Instead, they should be targeting flash ram and network devices. A good example is a mythtv client. But a slightly different one, would be to use POE (power over ethernet) to provide the power for a diskless system. Much easier to do.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  60. Re:Not $285; try $325. Go VIA instead... by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose you would have noticed that they're shipping from Israel? In which case, $40.00 isn't too bad.

    Who said they're shipping from Israel? They probably have a US distributor; they'd be stupid not to, as otherwise it means the customer pays duties and deals with customs headaches.

    Even if they are shipping from Israel, it still means the thing costs $320+. Besides, even in Israel, they're charging $20. That's highway robbery.

  61. 12W with Thinkpad X60 by superswede · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Turning off wifi, the IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad X60 1.83GHz uses ~12W with screen on. With wifi ~15W. This without trying to optimize anything.

  62. tags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can't wait. years from now, when i need to search slashdot for !fivewatt or !fivewatts, the clever monkeys at slashdot will have taken care of everything.

  63. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by julesh · · Score: 1

    Laptops typically need active cooling. Many cheap laptops are inadequately cooled and won't run indefinitely without being switched off. This PC is entirely passively cooled. That's a big plus for many applications (think digital media playback). It's also less than a quarter the size of an average laptop, meaning that for people like me who cannot stand to work with laptop keyboards and small displays it's a better solution. Of course the negatives (slow processor, lack of expandability) are significant, but if it works for your app it's probably ideal.

  64. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by dwater · · Score: 1

    > WRT54 doesn't have a 40 GB hard drive for logging

    It'll log to a remote machine though. Similar devices have USB for an external drive too.

    > I don't know how much a WRT54 would cost if they added a 40 GB laptop drive,

    I don't think you can add one, but others can...but it will log to an existing machine for centralised system management. ..and the wrt54g has 5 ports built in. It's pretty tricky to set them up for anything but the basic lan switching though.

    --
    Max.
  65. Nice little device by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    and it is sure useful in some applications, but other may be hindered by the lack of a PCI slot or two...

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  66. Saw these at comdex this year by unkaggregate · · Score: 1

    The ones I saw don't have a hard disk, they had a slot for CF cards to act as a hard drive. They're very lightweight too, and fully supported by Linux. If these take off they could very well become a very inexpensive PC for people who don't need dual core multi-gigahertz systems.

  67. Don't you mean TS-7300? by IvyKing · · Score: 1

    Looks like the Technologic Systems TS-7300 with the battery back-up PC-104 board - including the T.S. logo on the front of the case. T.S. has just started shipping a board with a 500 MHz ARM-9, which would be about 3X faster than the 7300, but would need the VGA add-on board.

  68. Rubbish review by tsa · · Score: 1

    Is that a review?! There wasn't any information in that very short piece of text, spread out over far too many pages, that I couldn't have come up with myself. "It becomes slow when we run a big office suite and firefox on it and open more than 6 windows." What would you expect? I think the fact that it is still useable with that much load is a testament to the quality of even todays cheap hardware.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  69. What about the external power supply by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1
    I have a similar box, a koolu , it is fine for web browsing, word processing, ... quite fast enough. Leave it on for several hours and it hardly gets warm. A sealed box - this would make it excellent for dusy environments.

    What does get warm is the external power supply - I wonder how many watts that consume ? 5 watts for the machine itself, something for the screen, something for the PSU. What is the total consumption ?

  70. Soekris by FranTaylor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Soekris has a whole lineup of single-board machines with this processor. The prices are pretty reasonable, and they have cases and a some accessories. Netgate makes wireless hardware kits for Soekris aystems. Soekris made the hardware for the MIT RoofNet project.

  71. Not a port, a USB ethernet adapter by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    The details are that it doesn't have an ethernet port on the box itself - instead, it comes with a USB 1.1 ethernet adapter that can't do 100 Mbps. But not a big deal for most internet connections, I suppose.

  72. Nice by asm2750 · · Score: 1

    Seems to use a pc104 setup. All-in-all however, I would rather build my own with solid state storage

  73. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    I had a laptop as a server (yes...). I rebooted it weekly. What exactly are you talking about? Even overclocked laptops don't need shut off to not overheat.

  74. Re:Not $285; try $325. Go VIA instead... by 15Bit · · Score: 1
    > Also, check out the super friendly support and warranty policies.

    Very customer friendly, i must say. This caught my attention in particular:

    "Warranty could be exercised only once per purchased product"

    Is this legal?

  75. The cheapest I've seen so far ... by timid3000 · · Score: 1

    http://www.ewayco.com/

    They seem to be more cost efficient compared to most of the other companies mentioned here, although their order system is a little unclear.
    To get clear specs, you also have to mail them, and their website looks like web 0.5 ...

  76. fast enough for p2p apps? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this would have enough power to run Emule or uTorrent. A 24/7 p2p server that only uses 6 watts of electricity. That small HD could be a problem though. Would like to substitute a 1 TB HDD.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    1. Re:fast enough for p2p apps? by k8to · · Score: 1

      rtorrent runs happily on a 486.

      this is plenty of horsepower for even utorrent.

      emule... likes to eat more ram than this has.

      --
      -josh
  77. Re:Not $285; try $325. Go VIA instead... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    Warranty could be exercised only once per purchased product.

    Wow - that's douchebaggery.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  78. Power Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I wish I had modpoints for left the parent! All power supplies are classified with their MAXIMUM power output. If all the PCs in the world were using all the rated watts of their power supplies this would be a much less green world. 110W on the supply Box are on the cautionary side, it's very likely the Mac mini uses normally around a quarter of that (It's mostly made out of notebook components afterall). Eiapoce as AC

  79. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $450 CND? What's that like $800 US?

  80. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Exactly, I picked up a bag of sand some oil, and I had some chemicals and a chip processing facility floating around in my garage. And I was able to make a computer for pennies on the dollar...
    STOP COMPARING PRICES OF USED/SLIGHTLY DAMAGED COMPUTERS WITH NEW ONES!!!!! It is not a fair comparison. Because in time I can get a used or slightly damaged version of the fit-PC and save more money, on parts (assuming your time is worthless)
    Clap Clap you can nuy someone modern computers for cheap, while other people buy very modern computer for not so cheap. You save so much money see how smart you are. You can play all the games made 2 or more years ago, smooth without any problems, especially with the fact the monitor can only support 1024x768.

    Some people like having new hardware. 5-Watt 13 Watt it uses only 38% of the power. which is good especially if you need a lot of computers running non cpu critical things.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  81. My PPC Mac Mini by cwerdna · · Score: 3, Informative

    My PPC 1.25 ghz G4 Mac Mini draws ~14W at idle and ~31W when its CPU is maxed about by distributed.net RC5 client. I measured this w/my Kill A Watt (http://www.p3international.com/products/special/P4400/P4400-CE.html).

  82. Re:Hello? Dectop? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    decTOP is selling FOUR for $300+S&H right now. It's got less specs, but I use mine just fine with its USB 1.1 and USB ethernet.

    I think fit-PC might be more interesting if it were sub-$200. Because processor-wise it is comparable to the decTOP. It only has slightly more RAM and a slightly bigger hdd. I don't think USB 2.0 and Ethernet suddenly makes something $200 more expensive.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  83. No. by zeromorph · · Score: 1

    Mini-ITX form factor is 6.7" x 6.7", this one has a 4.7" x 4.5" (x 1.5) case.

    So it's closer to Nano-ITX with 4.7" x 4.7" but this one is even smaller. I don't know which size the motherboard actually has, but if it's an ITX it can only be Pico-ITX but it's probably some embedded computing form factor like ETX.

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    1. Re:No. by m2943 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant "Mini-ITX or one of its successors". In any case, it's nothing unusual: there are many cheap, small, silent, embedded PCs you can get.

  84. My goodness... by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    ... that's pretty paltry for the money.

    You can pick up a Via C3-based cpu, board, and chassis for a little under $80. Another $100 will get you a gig of RAM and a 25-gig hard drive. In other words, twice the CPU power, four times the RAM, and six times the drive space, and all for $100 less.

    Yeah, I know - that would use more than 5 watts. But considering that everything in the machine except the CPU is nearly free, I wouldn't have expected it to have that sort of price tag. Ah, well. I guess they have to make up for low quantities.

    Now, if they just had a usable display with a similar power draw, THAT would be nice.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  85. But... by Darren+Foong · · Score: 1

    Does it run Doom?

  86. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by islanduniverse · · Score: 3, Informative

    P IV Celeron

    There's no such thing as a Pentium 4 Celeron! Pentium 4, or Celeron, but not both...
  87. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was researching this the other day. I was trying to find a replacement for my VIA EPIA SP8000E (it's a piece of junk; almost everything causes it to freeze or not boot).

    Requirements: Low power consumption. Low noise. Enough juice to run a decent web browser. Linux-compatible. Cheap.

    Being fed up with VIA, I first looked to laptops. Power consumption about 20 Watts, good. Need to be a bit more careful about the noise, but you can find quiet laptops no problem. Any laptop probably smokes the SP8000E performance-wise, so that's good too. However, I couldn't find a decent laptop for under around 500 euros, even second hand.

    Eventually, I bought a Jetway J7F2-EDEN fanless motherboard/cpu combo, a nice case with a passive power supply, and a gig of RAM for about 300 euros. Disks, display, and keyboard will be taken from my old system, as they would have been in the case of a laptop. Power consumption should be about 20 Watts. The system has no moving parts other than the disks. Performance ought to be better than what I have. And it's cheap.

    So, I guess, there's something for everyone. If you want to carry the system, or are OK using a laptop screen, keyboard, and mouse-substitute, get a laptop. Will be about 500 euros. If you don't want to carry it and want full-size input devices and screen, get a system like the one I got. Will also cost you about 500 euros if you have to buy the disk, keyboard, mouse, and monitor. If you want _really_ low power consumption and a PC, get the one mentioned in the story. Again, it will be around 500 euros, including monitor, disk and input devices. Word of warning: I work with machines like that at work and they are really really slow for today's standards.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  88. Make it 3 watts: it will run on a bicycle-dynamo by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    as that is what a typical bicycle-dynamo produces. Providing you make the OS safe and running from solid state memory - which should significantly less than a few watts - you could install it on your bike ;=)

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  89. Yawn ... by haraldm · · Score: 1

    I built something similar back in 2000/2001 (back then, such embedded boards sported a 200 MHz Cyrix GXm CPU — man were such embedded boards expensive!). Used that beast in my car as an MP3 player with 30 Gigs of HD space. Look for the string "MPorty" with your favourite search engine. Sadly, the two Linux magazine articles were taken offline since. I'm taking my old MPorty web page online for a while so if anyone's interested...

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  90. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by julesh · · Score: 1

    I've had multiple laptops that overheat after about 10-12 hours of use. I've even had one that would shut off after 1 hour if you left it directly on a table: you had to put it on top of something to give it enough space for the airflow to its (tiny) cooling fan that was located on the bottom of the case. I agree that there are laptops that don't have this problem, but there are also laptops that do.

  91. Linutop by henrikba · · Score: 1

    This looks a lot like the Linutop: http://www.linutop.com/

    Same price too, but it has more usb ports.

  92. Re:forget today's games by aurispector · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently built a mini itx system based around a via 1.5 ghz processor to do the same basic tasks the fit-pc is designed to handle. The fit isnt a bad box, it's just that it isn't really anythything new or innovative. Looks to me like they took a pico-itx board, slapped on a laptop hard disk and called it a system. The price is good for the size, but you can build a system with a way better processor, more ram and add a CF to IDE adapter so you can go without moving parts.

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  93. same specs, much lower price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ALIX board looks almost identical and it's very cheap. Even after adding a hard disk and a cabinet the price tag should be much smaller than the fit-pc.

    Note: I'm in no way paid by or affiliated to pcengines.ch, just a very happy customer who set up some firewalls and wlan repeaters in the past with their WRAP boards.

  94. Re:Not $285; try $325. Go VIA instead... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    So where can I get these in the USA?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  95. hertz are not necessarily comparable. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 1

    Comparing clock speed in one processor to the clock speed in another processor has never been completely accurate in estimating actual system speed (example: Compare a 10 MHz 8088 to a 10 MHz 80286 and you'll find the latter is FAR faster).

    Today, it's even more ludicrous to say that a 500 MHz processor is "about an eighth the processor" of a dual-core 1.83 GHz processor. Clock speed is only one factor (of many) that determines actual speed. Simple comparisons of clock speed only make the comparer look simple.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:hertz are not necessarily comparable. by ThatFunkyMunki · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that 500x8=4000.

      --
      If patriotism is racist, is racism patriotic?
  96. /. ed by TattleTale1975 · · Score: 0

    Delivery time: usually ships in 2 week. As of 13-Oct-07 fit-PC has been "slashdotted" (article on it published in Slashdot), so we observed unexpected demand peak. Currently we are out of stock. We expect to resume stock beginning of December '07. We apologize for the inconvenience.

  97. SlimServer? by maiden_taiwan · · Score: 1

    Looks like this might be a great host for a SlimServer based MP3 system. Anybody know how well the server software performs on this box?

    1. Re:SlimServer? by henrikba · · Score: 1

      I run slimserver and a NAS on the Linutop (http://www.linutop.com/), which has similar specs. Works great.

  98. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by emj · · Score: 1

    You do know that you are still using a VIA product?

  99. HP t5135 by nadador · · Score: 1

    I use one of these at home with an almost complete Debian install on a USB memory stick:
    http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF05a/12454-12454-321959-338927-89307-3341342.html
    US$200, no fan noise, very low power.

    As many have pointed out, if you purchase an entire system with power consumption as a priority, you can achieve a lower total power consumption. But for US$200, I've cut my 'check email, look up something on Wikipedia' power consumption by two orders of magnitude since I don't need a workstation for that.

    --

    Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside a dog, its too dark to read.
  100. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by STDOUBT · · Score: 1
    > What is the point of this fit PC again?

    Dual LAN?

  101. Re:slashvertisement _ Slashboycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's from ISRAEL

  102. Interesting by iperkins · · Score: 1

    The dual 100MBit ports do make it sound like an ideal candidate for an OpenBSD/[insert Linux distro here] router. I'd love to see more in depth specs on throughput, etc.

  103. Perfect opportunity by Typoboy · · Score: 1

    Yes, you can use it as a router for your 57.6k modem bank.. it's perfect!

  104. AppleTV $300, Runs Linux by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    The AppleTV
      - Can run Linux.
      - costs $300.
      - has digital audio and video out.
      - Can play 480p, 540p, 720p videos. I think 1080i as well, but I don't have that screen.
      - Running Linux allows web, email, and playing DVD's (vlc) (external drive).

  105. Another option, for $260 by a9db0 · · Score: 1

    The new Intel MB with an embedded Celeron processor has far better performance at a lower cost. Try this:

      $46.99 - Hard drive - 40GB, 5400rpm Seagate
        28.99 - 1GB Memory - Corsair DDR2 533
        69.50 - MB - Intel D201GLY, Celeron 1.33
        54.95 - Fanless power supply - picoPSU-120
        59.95 - Case - M300

    $260.38 - Total - Shipping NOT included

    Far better performance, reasonable power consumption (~25w), small and silent

    Or, if you prefer single stop shopping, try this.

    --
    -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
  106. Just a Wii bit better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Wii is THIS close to becoming a desktop computer. They now support a keyboard, and its only a matter of time before Linux is running on this little beast. Its $250 and it its got reasonable power behind it. Its not a quad core system with SLI video cards, but its surprisingly snappy and does boost decent 3d graphics.

    I predict in 1-2 years people will be subsituting a wii for a typical desktop system.

  107. Fit-PC RAM is non-expandable by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the RAM on the FIT-PC is non-expandable - you're stuck with the 256MB, so there will be applications you can't run effectively even if you're happy with the 500 MHz. I don't know if they soldered it on or what, but they don't even _sell_ a larger-RAM option. The disk is probably replaceable with a larger one if you need to, and the slow CPU is IMHO just fine for a lot of applications, but the RAM limit is annoying.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Fit-PC RAM is non-expandable by datadigger · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they soldered it on
      RAM is soldered.
      --
      Aphorisms don't fix code. (Bart Smaalders)
  108. And it's s-l-o-w by IvyKing · · Score: 1

    USB 1.1 maxes out somewhere between 6 to 8 Mbps of throughput, which would be adequate for surfing but would limit a router throughput to maybe 3 Mbps (bits have to go both ways). Emphatically not in the same league as the fit-PC. Contrast this to some embedded boards coming with gigabit ethernet adapters.

  109. Athlon at 654MHz by ano22000 · · Score: 1

    my Athlon Xp mobile 1800+, run at 1,5 GHZ. But if I do "powercfg.exe /change profile /processor-throttle-ac CONSTANT" with winxp, it run at 654MHz. It's enough for old games for example.

  110. Re:slashvertisement _ Slashboycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most likely, so is the CPU in your desktop PC (assuming you have an Intel machine). So is ICQ. So are several other tech products that you probably use on a daily basis. And so am I. What's your point?

  111. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by chox · · Score: 1

    No. $450 CND is more like $460 USD.

    --
    -Phing
  112. No, avoid VIA like the plauge... by tylernt · · Score: 1

    No, do not buy anything made by VIA. Mini-ITX is great, but I just got burned by VIA's southbridge DMA bug that they have not fixed in THREE years, nor do they make any attempt at looking like they care. Do yourself a favor and buy a Mini-ITX board, any board, without VIA chips on it.

    Here it is, in all 21 pages of glory starting back in 2004: http://forums.viaarena.com/messageview.aspx?catid=28&threadid=60131&STARTPAGE=21&enterthread=y

    --
    DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  113. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by chox · · Score: 1

    Correction.

    I'm assuming the original poster was referring to Canadian dollars, which is abbreviated CAD not CDN or even CND. In any case, I don't think the Fit PC was meant as a laptop replacement or a replacement for a power hungry PC. It's designed to fit a particular market niche.

    It seems like when any new market niche comes along, similar to OLPC (One Laptop Per Child), people bash the price point for which it is offered and unfairly compare it to a budget laptop currently available on the market. Similar to the design requirements of the OLPC (affordable AND durable!), the Fit PC was designed with specific goals in mind (size AND power consumption; NOT necessarily portability). Just because you can buy an equally green laptop for the same or cheaper price doesn't mean it will work in an environment which requires specific requirements. Think before you immediately poo-poo on an idea that doesn't fit your personal particular goals/budget.

    --
    -Phing
  114. I know I'm late to the party... by ItMustBeEsoteric · · Score: 1

    But Everex has a Via-based desktop PC that draws 2 watts average, 20 watts peak, and absolutely out-specs this little guy--for $300. And you can pick it up at Wal-Mart. http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=7754613 1.5GHz Via C-7 80GB hard disk, SATA 1GB RAM Dual-Layer DVD±RW 10/100 Ethernet 56K Modem Windows Vista (included even if you consider it throwaway) It only really loses on the side factor, of course.

  115. Want low power? Go ARM, go modular by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    If you want low power devices, you go with ARM not x86. That's the main reason no phones use x86.

    ARM parts have lacked horsepower vs x86, but the newer multi-code devices (http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2917028234.html) will change that.

    Small too. A whole system (CPU + RAM + some peripherals) can fit on a DIMM stick, or even on a single chip with stacked parts. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these in a regular laptop size case. Want a low power system for web and mail? Load just one module. Want a high performance gaming/ scientific workstation? Load all the module slots.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  116. almost perfect by overbom · · Score: 1

    I want something exactly like this but with wi-fi that I can use as a simple home router and lightweight home/web server. Any ideas?

  117. Turn in your geek card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly you've never heard of Cisco. Or know how datacenters are set up. Serial connections are the ultimate way of connecting to a box, especially if things go wrong.

    Here's an example. About a year ago one developer (and that's a real systems developer, mind you, not a web-monkey) managed to bring down the entire company network via a hub and multicast. Granted, he was incompetent. But the failure was absolutely spectacular. All of the networking LEDs on the switches were pegged solid. No flashing whatsoever. One almost never sees this; it's impressive when it happens. But needless to say, the company was dead in the water.

    The IT guys needed to get onto the switches quickly to start isolating the subnets to find out where the problem was, and disable the machine. Only they couldn't get onto the web or telnet/ssh interfaces because, by gosh, the network was pegged.

    I was there and suggested they use the serial port on the switches. Ding. The problem was soon solved, the network was back online, and the developer was fired.

    That's why RS-232 is going to be around for a long time.

  118. This is a stupid comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So please, do tell us what the connection speed is at your house. In the US, you are lucky to get 6 Mbps. Most folks have 1 Mbps. And dialup is stil way too prevalent.

    In fact, most small businesses and startups are in the same boat. You don't get over 20 Mbps unless you've got the big bucks to pay for it. Or are living in a different country.

    Even if you use a colo server, you've still got to connect to it, don't you? Honestly, your comment is extremely stupid.

    1. Re:This is a stupid comment by PayPaI · · Score: 1
      Wow, I was about to comment point by point, then I reread this:

      Even if you use a colo server, you've still got to connect to it, don't you?
      Sheer genius. You can't make this stuff up, folks.
    2. Re:This is a stupid comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Clearly you don't realize it, but you just said you set up colo servers that you can't connect to. Cool! In that case, 10 Mbps ought to work just fine for you. You might even save money by going with a 9600 baud modem.

      You're right, you can't make this stuff up. Honestly, you're not even doing a good job as a poser, let alone a clueless newb.

  119. Geode not going away. by jon287 · · Score: 1

    The Geode SC1100 is going away. This was a little 266Mhz i586 cpu. The New LX800 that this is based on is a system on chip that runs at 500Mhz. It IS the replacement.

    --
    To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
  120. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by mmontour · · Score: 1

    There's no such thing as a Pentium 4 Celeron! Pentium 4, or Celeron, but not both... "Pentium 4 Celeron" looks perfectly valid to me, even if it's not an Intel-approved label. "Celeron" (like "Xeon") is a modifier, not a specific type of processor. It's relative to whatever Intel happens to be shipping as its "main" product at that time. For example, according to Wikipedia the first Celeron was a 266 or 300 MHz Pentium-II (Deschutes) with no cache.
  121. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone just needs to make a Linux based ATM application or a Linux based touch-screen information kiosk. Then you'll have two obvious applications. Ditch the case and it's got these things going for it: small space footprint, low maintenance, and cheap to leave running.

  122. Re:almost perfect ... USB gives you what you need. by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

    FitPC has USB.
          -- You can add a usb wifi peripheral to turn it into an Access Point.

    http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=785329

          -- add a usb/ethernet

    for a DMZ with three ethernets...
    usb ethernet example: http://www.amazon.com/Belkin-F5D5050-Networking-Ethernet-Adaptor/dp/B000062R4P

    disclaimer: I just googled, no idea about linux compatibility of these particular devices.

    USB makes this completely flexible...

  123. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    What is the point of this fit PC again? I agree for the price, laptop is spiffy. It's too bad you can't get laptop without the battery, screen, and keyboard and get it into such a small form factor and actually slash the price of the extras. On my laptop for example I don't use it as a portable computer, but a transportable one. I don't use the onboard screen or keyboard. Even thinking about GPS applications such as on a boat, I would prefer a screen on a crane. A 5x5x1 pc would be more practical.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  124. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by TClevenger · · Score: 1
    Oh, I'm so sorry. In that case, I'll get a Compaq Presario Core Duo 1.46GHz with 1GB of RAM, 120GB hard drive and DVDRW for $470, and get a brand new machine, with only slightly more idle power usage, built-in UPS and built-in screen.

    Let's face it, the FitPC is a pretty limited machine for the price.

  125. Re:No point in this. Get a laptop! by orclevegam · · Score: 1

    What is the point of this fit PC again? It's semi-custom hardware which is geeky, and the base system is really tiny. I think they missed its true calling by suggesting it should be used as a e-mail/web box, as one of these would totally rock as a firewall or other specialized headless system. Right out of the box it already has 2x100M ethernet jacks, which although not as nice as dual gigabit should be enough for most standard home uses. I mean, who has a greater than one gigabit connection to their home (this being slashdot and all, I'm sure a few of you have OC3 lines or something equally massive, but for the sake of everyone lets just ignore that and say "typical home user")?
    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  126. Listen up, Comrad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comrade! We have detected you using mathematics and logic to stop an anti-anti-Apple tirade! Please be advised: this is Slashdot. Apple sells only well-priced software and hardware. Pointing out that Apple (just like Microsoft) depend on, and produce enormous amounts of non-free software and are extremely successful in applying for (and being granted) patents to an extent it makes Microsoft look like frightened kittens. You should Never try to argue about these non-free aspect and that Apple is not very different from Microsoft, other than that they also limit users not just to their software, but their hardware. We here at the Ministry for Mac Fanboy Indignation hope that you will reconsider your eminently logical position and join with us in our outrage that Apple will cause world peace and that it's OK to try to sell your own movies when you're having a talk about OSX news as long as you (Jobs) can get even richer from doing so, with no thought on anything else than cash. You don't even have to take even a remote stance in society, being interested in helping the world with donations while still being rich (like Billy-boy). Thank you.

  127. You want a display with that? by lushmore · · Score: 1

    17-inch backlit LCD will cost you 20 watts. Doh!

  128. Re:Compare it with... Apple TV! by bytta · · Score: 1

    Mac Mini: 1.83 Ghz Core 2 Duo
    Tiny-PC: 500Mhz Geode
    Apple TV: 1Ghz single, 256MB RAM, 40GB Hdd, No optical drive, etc...

    Seems like they took the AppleTV specs and made a low-power version.
    Why do Slashdotters insist on comparing apples and oranges?