Slashdot Mirror


The Curious Histories of Generic Domain Names

cheezitmike writes "ITworld.com uses the Wayback Machine to document the histories of five generic domain names: music.com, eat.com, car.com, meat.com, and milk.com. 'In this brave new Web 2.0 world, it's almost a badge of honor to have a Web site name that only hints at what the user will find there (see Flickr) or is so opaque as to offer no clue at all as to what the Web site is about (see del.icio.us). It's easy to forget the first Internet gold rush of the mid-to-late '90s, when dot-com domain names based on ordinary (and, investors hoped, marketable) nouns and verbs were snapped up by hopeful companies from the humble geeks who had purchased them (often ironically) in the early '90s.'"

208 comments

  1. still waiting by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm still waiting for someone to make me an offer on my domain: thissitewillmakemerich.com

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:still waiting by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I'll give you $5.

    2. Re:still waiting by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Funny

      SOLD!



      (hehehe. sucker.)

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:still waiting by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

      because nobody wants to make you rich they want to make themselves rich, so it should be "www.thissitewillmakeyourich.com"

    4. Re:still waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame. I was going to bid $20. Seriously.

    5. Re:still waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will pay $30

    6. Re:still waiting by fo0bar · · Score: 4, Funny

      I own iwantyoutogivemeyourmoney.com. Unfortunately, it hasn't been as profitable as I expected.

    7. Re:still waiting by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

      I was going to give you money right up to the point I didn't have my paypal details saved in my browser, sorry, you can have money but not the 10 seconds it would take me to type them.

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    8. Re:still waiting by aclarke · · Score: 1

      Apparently, though, he CAN have the 15 seconds it took you to type a response.

      That's a great site. I wonder how much money it's made.

    9. Re:still waiting by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Thats a bit high of a UID for someone who has read /. all these years.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    10. Re:still waiting by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

      Hey, I got an idea. Try selling the pixels of your web page at like 10 for a dollar to people so they can put their own tiny banner ads in them.

      That's okay, you don't need to thank me.

    11. Re:still waiting by dynomitejj · · Score: 0

      I know. I never signed up until recently. With the quality of posts on this site going down so much, I don't know if a low UID is something to brag about anyway, except for the fact that you were around during the good ol' days of slashdot. I don't mean to be so negative. I like to have fun as much as anyone else. I just miss the days when Slashdot was cool. It's not anymore. It's more like "SlashDORK". Maybe as the site became more popular, the ratio of noise increases. The larger the group, the lower the overall IQ.

    12. Re:still waiting by BiLlCaT · · Score: 1

      From an "old timer" (this is actually my second account here... I was reading /. when the crew was going to school here in W Michigan), I tend to agree with you. The quality of the posts, though, has really ebbed and flowed over the years. I think quality has actually gone up slightly recently (and thus I've started reading again).

      --
      the amazing bc
      just another guy doing IT
      webnaut, music junkie, holes-in-head
  2. Marketing Genius by deadeye766 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm no marketing genius, but who the hell thought domain names like meat.com and milk.com were going to be goldmines?!?

    1. Re:Marketing Genius by Ajehals · · Score: 3, Funny

      The same people who thought that people would be exclusively buying their milk and meat (and admittedly other foodstuffs) on-line by now, some of them were VC's and dumped a huge amount of cash on this IIRC..

    2. Re:Marketing Genius by phoebusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Before web searching was as effective as it is now (largely thanks to Google), it wasn't illogical to think that people might type generic domains to find what they are looking for, i.e. meat.com if they are looking to order meat, get info on meat, or what have you.

      The idea that many marketers (and others) had is that not only would owning such domains get you more traffic, but it would also begin to associate the very idea of _noun_ on the web with your particular brand of _noun_.

    3. Re:Marketing Genius by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

      who the hell thought domain names like meat.com and milk.com were going to be goldmines?

      Obviously the kind of people whose brains think at the complete opposite end of the spectrum as the folks who thought up this one.

    4. Re:Marketing Genius by KillerCow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm no marketing genius, but who the hell thought domain names like meat.com and milk.com were going to be goldmines?!?


      Someone who thought that they could sell meat.com to:
      The American Butchers' Association
      The German Butchers' Association
      Elite Butchers Association
      The National Meat Packers Association
      Alberta meat packers
      Butcher Consultants Ltd
      M&M Meat Shops
      PETA
      A Gay Porn Site

      Someone who thought that they could sell milk.com to:
      The USDA
      Dairy Farmers of Ontario (owner of milk.org)
      British Columbia Milk Marketing Board (milk-bc.com)
      Any other milk marketing board (big, subsidized, cash-rich, protected business)
      A Gay Porn Site

      I'm no marketing genius either, but I think that it would be safe to think that those names would be worth at least $1000 to any of those organizations. Turning $10 into $1000 is a pretty good scam if you can do it a couple of times.
    5. Re:Marketing Genius by deadeye766 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. Forgive me for being brash, young, and ignorant to the ways of the world. =)

    6. Re:Marketing Genius by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why? You're no different from most slashdotters.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:Marketing Genius by Dancindan84 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Call me paranoid, but there's no way on earth any sane person would just plug in meat.com expecting (hoping?) to find steaks on an internet full of porn (which it was even back then). I'm just going to type in gloryhole.com and see if it's a site on glass blowing... AH GOD MY EYES!!

      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    8. Re:Marketing Genius by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ehm, you're confusing "slashdotters with experience" and "normal people". Normal people would most certainly write things like "dinner.com" or "restaurant.com", just to stay a bit more realist. The GP is right, Google changed the market. Domain names aren't as important as they used to be, search ranks are.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    9. Re:Marketing Genius by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine those naive days of the internet, where they imagined care free 8 year olds typing "meat.com" into the browser to look up information on meat, without any concerns about whether or not "meat.com" would contain genuine information on meat products.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    10. Re:Marketing Genius by jumpingfred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Go to milk.com. It is some guys personal website from way back. He never sold it he never tried to sell it.

    11. Re:Marketing Genius by dosboot · · Score: 1

      Now we replace 'meat' with 'wikipedia'. Zing!

    12. Re:Marketing Genius by Traxxas · · Score: 1

      The same genius that in June of 2007 had http://web.archive.org/web/20070629093649rn_1/www.meat.com/badbrowser.htm as a home page for spiders. I'll get right on that upgrade to IE 4 there champ.

    13. Re:Marketing Genius by RobBebop · · Score: 1, Informative

      largely thanks to Google

      You are wrong. Web searching was available from Altavista.com, Yahoo.com, and Excite.com LONG before Google.com made a meaningful impact on the World Wide Web. Hell, even AOL's proprietary crapware gave you the ability to search the web.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    14. Re:Marketing Genius by Firehed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How could a VC firm not be intelligent enough to realize that mail-order perishables isn't going to work out well, especially on cheap heavy things that would be a logistical nightmare to ship?

      I mean, sure, it looks like that whole world wide internet web thing is starting to catch on, but it doesn't take a genius to realize that you can't make much of a business of shipping a $4 gallon of milk. I suppose an online milkman type thing would stand a chance but people are so used to running out for milk every day anyways that it just wouldn't make sense. Margins on most foods are just too low for anything of that nature to make sense. I suppose filet mignon could work (and, indeed, I'm pretty sure you can buy it from Amazon these days) since it's got a much more workable price/weight ratio, but this is like pets.com thinking that shipping fifty-pound bags of kitty litter would work out.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    15. Re:Marketing Genius by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Replace "meat" with "whitehouse" and you did an excellent job summing up some awkward situations in middle school.

      Luckily back then, websites had about a 22% uptime so you had a pretty good chance of 404ing when a teacher was nearby.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    16. Re:Marketing Genius by JimDaGeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, come on now. Non-tech people didn't have the same "dirty" thoughts as us geeks.

      I have 85 year old grandparents that have been married for over 50 years! Yeah, longer than most of us geeks were just a dirty thought in their daddy's head (no pun intended).

      Older people just don't put 2 and 2 together and come up with 4 when it comes to the inter-tubes. They are after all, a series of pipes.

      Now, as far as old school goes, I remember watching a pic download over a dog-old modem of a nude chick. Damn, talk about fun. I remember seeing the boobs start to show and then slowly the belly and then... damn, ouch mom, what was that slap for?

      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    17. Re:Marketing Genius by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How could a VC firm not be intelligent enough to realize that mail-order perishables isn't going to work out well
      Are you telling me VC doesn't stand for Vacuous Cunt?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Marketing Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You give Google WAY too much credit. They were a late, late entrant to the search field, and were far more important in ad revenue than they ever were in search. Think Archie > Jughead > Lycos > AltaVista, Excite...... > google

    19. Re:Marketing Genius by msormune · · Score: 1

      Why are you calling this a scam? Why should any of the organizations actually own a domain like 'milk' or 'meat'?

    20. Re:Marketing Genius by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      >> I mean, sure, it looks like that whole world wide internet web thing is starting to catch on, but it doesn't take a genius to realize that you can't make much of a business of shipping a $4 gallon of milk.

      No, it did not take a genius; it took quite a few thousand idiots, and a sh*tload of money to realize it.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    21. Re:Marketing Genius by Homr+Zodyssey · · Score: 1
      I don't think you guys are using your imagination. "milk.com" does not necessarily need to sell milk to be a marketing goldmine. It just has to do something relating to milk. Maybe it could be a place to research where your milk came from.
      You could learn about different kinds of milk like
      • whole milk
      • soy milk
      • 2% milk
      • 1% milk
      • skim milk
      • goat milk
      • chocolate milk
      • milk-shakes
      • milk chocolate
      • condensed milk
      • evaporated milk
      • powdered milk
      • butter-milk
      • malted milk
      • milk of magnesia
      • br3@st milk
      • sour milk
      • milk and honey
      • milk duds
      Slashdot won't let me post anymore....it says I have too few characters per line :(
    22. Re:Marketing Genius by omeomi · · Score: 1

      No, it did not take a genius; it took quite a few thousand idiots, and a sh*tload of money to realize it.

      Well, those two things are pretty interchangeable. And idiots are a lot easier to find. 1 Genius = 3000 idiots + money

    23. Re:Marketing Genius by contraba55 · · Score: 1

      That was probably one of the best misdirection sites there was. Students and average users alike want to know what goes on in government, type in "Whitehouse" and get... Well, use the Wayback Machine, that's what it's for.

    24. Re:Marketing Genius by Mex · · Score: 1

      I'm no marketing genius, but who the hell thought domain names like meat.com and milk.com were going to be goldmines?!?

      Not just that, they have apparently grabbed all those ".com keywords" for other foreign languages. It's pretty clear, because you visit the spanish equivalent, and it's full of english ads.

    25. Re:Marketing Genius by onepoint · · Score: 1

      What a great site. I was lost, now iz found warm home

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    26. Re:Marketing Genius by hitmark · · Score: 1

      mail order may not work, but what about being able to order the whole shopping cart without going out the door, and having it delivered? remember, this was also the time when everone would be working from home if their job allowed it...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    27. Re:Marketing Genius by phoebusQ · · Score: 1

      I didn't saw searching the web, but rather the significant boost in the efficacy of those searches. Google brought the issues of search relevance out into the public eye more than any company before it, as evidenced by the massive adoption of the engine by the general public.

    28. Re:Marketing Genius by phoebusQ · · Score: 1

      Google significantly boosted the efficacy of the typical user search over what had been previously achieved by AltaVista, Yahoo, Lycos, etc...that is how they gained their initial market share, and what ultimately lead to the reduction in desireability of the "generic" domain.

    29. Re:Marketing Genius by spazLizard · · Score: 1

      I know someone who has Google as the their homepage and when I tell her to go to www.somewebsite.com she types the url into the actual search window. But since she always gets that site as the first match I have given up trying to explain the difference.

    30. Re:Marketing Genius by hoooocheymomma · · Score: 1

      Venture capitalism is extremely high risk, so it stands to reason that a lot of the people willing to take such risks are dumb. And of course there are plenty of people who know about this dumbness, and exploit it. Pitch some ridiculous idea, run a few rounds of VC, build up a small business around it, take a HUGE salary, then either sell the company or abandon ship when the company fails.

      But just in case you don't know:

      http://www.giantfood.com/peapod/
      http://shop.safeway.com/offers/swy/default6.asp?PRMX_GOOG_DELIVER_0703

      It doesn't seem terribly unreasonable to me that a company in the mid 90s could start a site called meat.com and make deals with tons of local grocery stores to deliver meat/groceries.

    31. Re:Marketing Genius by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      You own milk.com, don't you?

      Who's to say it couldn't just be purchased by the same place that runs the "Got Milk?" and "Milk: it does the body good" commercials? Advertising for a healthy product plus tie-ins for centralized shipping (not mail-order but for farmers and trucking companies), information (as noted above), etc.

    32. Re:Marketing Genius by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong... I completely AGREE with everything else you say. During the AOL days, I would type pornographic words into the Address Bar hoping to find the content that should have been there. I would use "ESPN" and a relatively small subset of URLs which I had memorized. But that list of URLs included mainly search engines, because search makes it unimportant to have common URL names.

      Maybe we just started using the internet in different ways at different times, but up until 2001 or 2002, search engines Excite and Yahoo competed with each other to be my "homepage" based on which served the best results. Lycos and Ask never had a chance because their results have always lagged behind others. Altavista was known for being about to find esoteric results, when the "Big 2" failed. Also, they had bablefish, which was a particularly helpful tool for High School Spanish class. But in any case, nothing about these other search engines ever bothered be because I couldn't quickly find what I was looking for. I could use quote marks and plus/minus signs to make tougher searches more refined... but I do that now with Google, anyway.

      Google got me to use them exclusively since about 2002 because of simplicity and speed. I think to this day Yahoo continues to have the same "efficacy of searches" as Google, but it takes longer for the page to load (because of the bloated Portal mentality) and it isn't as fast as Google (i.e. "10 of 2 million results in 0.03 seconds"). So, I believe it is wrong to give credit to Google for providing a "significant boost in efficacy of web searches".

      If you really want to give credit to Google for their innovation, credit them for realizing that users want a simple, straightforward, easy-to-use User Interface.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    33. Re:Marketing Genius by OECD · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't think you guys are using your imagination. "milk.com" does not necessarily need to sell milk to be a marketing goldmine.

      You're almost there...

      • br3@st milk

      Bingo! With that and "meat.com" and you can almost print money...

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    34. Re:Marketing Genius by El+Yanqui · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well as a former employee of Kozmo.com when they first opened in Seattle, I can say with a bit of authority that VCs in the late 90s didn't realize a hell of a lot. "Deliver movies ordered online in an hour? With no delivery charge? Something, something. Profit!"

      --
      Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.
    35. Re:Marketing Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone who thought that they could sell meat.com to: ...
      The National Meat Packers Association ...
      A Gay Porn Site


      For the latter one, I believe you're looking for "The National Fudge Packers Association".

    36. Re:Marketing Genius by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      but it doesn't take a genius to realize that you can't make much of a business of shipping a $4 gallon of milk.

      Yeah, but shipping 20-lb bags of dog food is going to catch on like crazy!

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    37. Re:Marketing Genius by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How could a VC firm not be intelligent enough to realize that mail-order perishables isn't going to work out well, especially on cheap heavy things that would be a logistical nightmare to ship?

      Given the extensive history of companies selling perishables mail order, I'd suspect the lack of intelligence is on the part of the Slashdot poster rather than the VC firms. Omaha Steaks has been doing it since at least the 70's (I say at least because I think I have an even earlier advertisement from them somewhere in my files, but cannot locate it ATM). Swiss Colony even longer. In fact, such shipping has been going on since dry ice was first produced in industrial quantites in the 1920's.
       
      Look in the advertisements of most National Geographics of the 50's, or and food magazine from the same era, and you'll see ads aplenty.
       
      </culinary_geek>
       
      The mistake the VC firms of the dot bomb era made was, as you point out, marketing the wrong things to the wrong demographic. However, given the history of food deliveries and the increased performance of shipping companies as the 90's advanced - and it wasn't clearly obvious that their schemes were off the mark. (Doubly so since the big grocery chains have been slowly expanding into online ordering...)
       
      Foresight isn't always 20-20 on Slashdot either, back in the day there were a lot of posts explaining how Amazon and Netflix were going to fail 'any day now'. They simply couldn't compete with bricks-and-mortar everyone said. The future lay with clicks-and-mortar, with Barnes and Noble, and Blockbuster...
    38. Re:Marketing Genius by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      The one thing I miss about AltaVista is the facility to search for words "near" words.

      Especially when I search for a specific phrase I don't completely remember that made it a lot easier to narrow down the results, since in Google I don't find anything when I put it in quotes, but when I don't put it in quotes I get buried in results.

    39. Re:Marketing Genius by tubapro12 · · Score: 1

      Too bad there's already a website that does that, its called Wikipedia blah blah... ?search=milk&fulltext=Search.

    40. Re:Marketing Genius by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      The issue was that old browsers weren't tied into search engines. If someone typed "meat" or "whitehouse", it just blindly added the ".com" and went to the site. When AOL bought Netscape, one of the first things they did was tie in their keyword/search system, which was the beginning of the end of this annoying behavior.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    41. Re:Marketing Genius by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Only if her first name is "Esther".

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    42. Re:Marketing Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look how well freshmeat.com does though.

    43. Re:Marketing Genius by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

      oh brother.... :-\

    44. Re:Marketing Genius by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, no, they said ordering groceries. Nobody said anything about shipping. For example, Webvan.com.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    45. Re:Marketing Genius by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it's a good idea. There are lots of everyday items that I want a pretty steady supply of, and having 3 small kids besides our jobs mean me and my wife has better things to do than hang around in shops.

      I'd love to have a lcd integrated in my fridge with the "standard" shopping-list stuff on it, and a simple method of hitting "send" and get the stuff delivered, twice a week would suffice.

      Now, it'd be hard to get off the ground. You'd need a critical mass of buyers for efficient delivery, and I don't -have- a internet-connected lcd on my fridge (nor do most people)

      But they deliver much -more- perishable stuff like Pizza, surely the logistics of delivering a basket containing the following 2-dozen articles sometime thursday between 17-20 are easier than the logistics of delivering that precise meal half an hour from now ?

    46. Re:Marketing Genius by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I've seen bovine lactation offered via Amazon Marketplace, actually. Seems like almost as dumb an idea as mistaking the stuff for food in the first place, but then, whoever thought that eBay auctions for cars would be successful either?

    47. Re:Marketing Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use a tilde (~) before a search term to include synonyms of it in your query. For example, searching for ~happy will bring up pages about joy, contentness, etc.

    48. Re:Marketing Genius by jargon82 · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't really help the folks who still type single words into the address bar... and believe me, there are LOTS of these people :)

    49. Re:Marketing Genius by jargon82 · · Score: 1

      What, you mean like this? http://www.giantfood.com/peapod?linkid=120

    50. Re:Marketing Genius by hitmark · · Score: 1

      exactly...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    51. Re:Marketing Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PRECISELY.

      From what I remember, back then... the interbutts wasn't all about making money! It was about this great "information superhighway" (never liked that term) where you could have instant access to limitless amounts of information. It took a couple of years before there were big bright flashing billboards every 3 feet on the highway and 90% of the exits required credit cards.

      If I were to buy milk.com in 1995, I would not have thought about selling milk online, I would have thought about providing information about milk, or just an "about my company" site for my dairy farm.

      Of course I wish I had thought of registering beef.com to sell online bulk beef. I would have been a gadjillionaire by now. One alternator sized chunk at a time.

    52. Re:Marketing Genius by kpharmer · · Score: 1

      > How could a VC firm not be intelligent enough to realize that mail-order perishables isn't going to work out well...

      No - you need to think big. Really big. We're not talking merely about shipping milk & meat here, we're talking about milk & meat *portals*. In the meat portal for example, you'd find:
          - forums where you can share thoughts with other meat enthusiasts - "The Meat Room"
          - recreational activities for the meat-based lifestyle like http://www.hatsofmeat.com/
          - meat-based recipes
          - the "Meat Haus" chat room
          - where you can buy or sell meat in any quantity - the "Meaty Money Pit"

      I wouldn't give up on this. I know the Atkins diet has faded a bit, but perhaps it's just getting ready for a rebound? And we'll see a surge of excitement over meat again?

    53. Re:Marketing Genius by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      The idea that many marketers (and others) had is that not only would owning such domains get you more traffic, but it would also begin to associate the very idea of _noun_ on the web with your particular brand of _noun_.

      For anyone doubting, consider how many times you'd see "AOL KEYWORD: GOATS" on TV and print advertising up until fairly recently. That was functionally identical to registering keyword domains for a very large percentage of online people.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    54. Re:Marketing Genius by default+luser · · Score: 1

      br3@st milk

      Jesus Christ, what a pansy.

      REPEAT AFTER ME: Slashdot doesn't censor your posts. Slashdot is just a liberterian commune, as scary as that sounds.

      breasts!
      tits!
      boobs!
      melons!

      Shout it from the mountaintops. There's nothing to be ashamed of.

      And while we're on the subject, don't be afraid to let loose with a good fuck or shit now and then. Swearing every now and then is good for YOUR mental health, so fuck the people around you.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    55. Re:Marketing Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same dickhole who tried to sell fortunecookie.com to my wife for $100,000.

    56. Re:Marketing Genius by uncle+slacky · · Score: 1

      manbeef.com didn't turn out so well, though.

      --
      Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
    57. Re:Marketing Genius by the_arrow · · Score: 1

      When it comes to meat, I prefer red meat.

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
  3. Forgot one by billius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    porn.com

    1. Re:Forgot one by gbaldwin2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sex.com was the fun one. With all the who-stole-what intrigue.

    2. Re:Forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By friend owned beef.com for years, kept trying to sell it to ranchers, PETA rented it for some time, I kept telling him to run a gay porn site on it.

      He still has tobacco.com which has had several UDRP attempted hijackings on it.

    3. Re:Forgot one by dryueh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Forgot another one: jesus.com

      I'm sure many of us remember the "Win a date with Jesus" site that lived at jesus.com for many, many years. You could even take a bath with Jesus. I've often wondered how it was that always-datable Jesus came to sell the domain.

    4. Re:Forgot one by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      The hosting costs crucified him

    5. Re:Forgot one by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Jesus has moved to DateJesus.com.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    6. Re:Forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could totally lease tobacco.com to those "Truth" dickholes.

    7. Re:Forgot one by LoveGoblin · · Score: 1

      Shit. Reading the article I kept thinking to myself "Well, at least there will always be jesus.com." Turns out that's not the case. I am sad now.

  4. The operative word is "almost" by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it's almost a badge of honor to have a Web site name that only hints at what the user will find there...

    The only reason companies resort to those names is because (a) all the good ones are taken and/or (b) there are potential trademark infringement issues with using more common sounding names.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:The operative word is "almost" by pegr · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...it's almost a badge of honor to have a Web site name that only hints at what the user will find there...
       
      Like slashdot?

    2. Re:The operative word is "almost" by bonkeydcow · · Score: 1

      http://www.wwwcom.com/ I don't actually know what this site is, but I heard a commercial for it on the radio once and it stuck in my head ever since.

  5. Remember domain names BEFORE the web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember that domain names pre-date the world wide web. Someone may have been using barf.com as a simple FTP site and never had a web page associated with it.

    1. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember that domain names pre-date the world wide web. Someone may have been using barf.com as a simple FTP site and never had a web page associated with it. You kids and yer newfangled 'domain names'! Sheesh! Why, in my day, we had !-paths. To e-mail someone far away was truly an exercise in typing:

      Remember that domain names pre-date the world wide web. Someone may have been using barf.com as a simple FTP site and never had a web page associated with it. You could tell the route your mail was gonna take! And we LIKED it that way!

      Now you kids get off my lawn!

      Domain names, indeed. *shakes head in disgust*

    2. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by sconeu · · Score: 1

      You kids and yer newfangled 'domain names'! Sheesh! Why, in my day, we had !-paths. To e-mail someone far away was truly an exercise in typing:

      And everything went through either decwrl or ucbvax.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by ahsile · · Score: 1

      Bang paths... the horror... the repressed memories! I never want to see those again. Please.

    4. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by smellsofbikes · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was at a small, but unaccountably well-connected college, sending email to my dad, who was working at a big tech company. Usually I just copied whatever route he'd chosen, and then marvelled as my mail got to him in LESS THAN TWO HOURS -- the very idea! At the time, it was still pretty unusual that two people would both have access to email, so I actually showed off to my friends -- "hey look at THIS!"
      Well, one of my friends knew more than me, so he taught me about uuhosts -- a way to find out what was connected, for the times when my email was just vanishing because something, somewhere, was offline. So I used it. The next day I got some Very Crabby Email from a sysop who tore me a new one for using a satellite uplink to send personal email to Japan and back.

      It felt like having a switchboard operator yell at me. I was *mortified* and I didn't even know for sure what I'd done.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    5. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by gbaldwin2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did something similar. I worked for a company that was doing software for the Boeing 777 and we polled them like every 10 minutes. We also polled sun and hp, 2 fairly well connect west coast servers. One day I came into work and our uucp links were melting down with email traffic (probably 50 emails an hour or something lame like that). The new UUCP maps had come out and we were the shortest hop to Boeing from just about anywhere. I ended up changing the maps to make us look more distant and implementing some email filtering. Good times...

    6. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, kremvax bang paths you!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by DdJ · · Score: 1

      You could tell the route your mail was gonna take! And we LIKED it that way!

      No, you couldn't. It depended on the order in which various hosts used various parsing rules, and there wasn't always a standard for that. I mean, how did mail to "kremvax!drycas!doug%fnord!wubba%diddle@bletch.com" route? If you only used UUCP, then it was easy, but the moment you became more interconnected...

      Oh god, the flashbacks have started. Quick, someone hold me down and hit me in the face with the second edition of the bat book...
    8. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by SurturZ · · Score: 1

      then marvelled as my mail got to him in LESS THAN TWO HOURS


      Hehe Fidonet in the late 80's - living in Australia, I got excited when I got a reply from the US within three days :-)
    9. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by caluml · · Score: 1

      That could explain a lot. Messing with email instead of writing solid thrust controllers. :)

    10. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by gbaldwin2 · · Score: 1

      We didn't do thrust controllers, we did fuel flow sensors... Wait a minute! BASTARDS!

    11. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by ozbird · · Score: 1

      They had names? I just remember "ftp 128.252.135.4".

    12. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "And everything went through either decwrl or ucbvax "

      You clazy.

      decwrl (west coast) or ihnpss (which replaced ihnp4 on the east coast)

      You had to be nuts to send mail to udbvax, the Brahms gang would read it and send you back major flamage.

      At least with decwrl the worst that would happen is you'd get a snippy note from Brian about spelling.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    13. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by rs79 · · Score: 1

      There used to be a little site in LA called gryphon.com that pulled a feed from decwrl and NASA JPL and spread news and mail all around LA. It also had a BBS thing Bill Blue wrote called "Pnet" or "PoepleNet". People who had no idea what the internet was or even that is existed used pnet. The rest of us had shell access.

      The guy that ran it, predictably, read all the mail going through that system.

      One conversation, he relarted, was some kid who was talking to some other kid about videogames.

      The timing of when uucp polled was somtimes pretty good.

      So these two kids were talking back and forth in near real time. At one point the converstaion apparantly went like this:

      "Sounds like a cool game. Maybe you should come over some time and we can play"

      "That might be difficult as I'm in France"

      "France? Is that in Orange county"

      "No, France as in Paris France, in Europe"

      "Huh?"

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    14. Re:Remember domain names BEFORE the web by mnbjhguyt · · Score: 1

      At the time, it was still pretty unusual that two people would both have access to email

      well, no wonder there wasn't much traffic going on.

  6. Over all these years by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 5, Funny

    purple.com always delivered what it promises.

    1. Re:Over all these years by UID30 · · Score: 1

      And of course the other end of the spectrum is ... http://zombo.com/. ... the real is unreal at zombo com.

      --
      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte
    2. Re:Over all these years by n3tcat · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree, though I find myself far more fulfilled by the offerings of Zombocom

    3. Re:Over all these years by Firehed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Having been super-goatse'd from following a slashdotter's advice before, do I dare probe this domain for a sarcasm tag from work?

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Over all these years by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It's safe. Just a big blank purple page...

      Well, not blank. There's a FAQ link...

    5. Re:Over all these years by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      You can do anything you want at zombo com.

    6. Re:Over all these years by griffjon · · Score: 1

      unlike http://zombo.com/ ; which just taunts you.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    7. Re:Over all these years by GoodNicksAreTaken · · Score: 1

      I know of a fairly major cable provider whose tech support always has customers go to purple.com to test connectivity. I'm sworn to secrecy though. They are the 13th largest MSO though for those with google skills that may care [and apparently no lives].

    8. Re:Over all these years by Firehed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huh, truth in advertising... a rare occurrence these days. And certainly better than goatse.

      Oh goatse... that will haunt me forever.

      Ugh, damn. I'm thinking about it again.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    9. Re:Over all these years by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      The difference is that Zombo.com has only been since 1999, and therefore does not fall into the same category as the sites in TFA, whereas purple.com has been around since 1994.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    10. Re:Over all these years by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      Look at the source for http://www.purple.com/purple.html.
      Notice the line: <META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT="86400; URL=index2.html">
      In other words, if you leave the purple page open for 24 hours, you get a new page with actual content (sort of)!
      http://www.purple.com/index2.html

    11. Re:Over all these years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are things on the internet that are much worse than goatse...

    12. Re:Over all these years by Firehed · · Score: 1

      There was more than goatse on that page. Much more...

      god damn it, why do I keep checking the comment replies?! *shudder*

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  7. Dreadful names by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    I, for one, hate seeing common, general words be misused like that. It's a lower-than-low attention grab.

    1. Re:Dreadful names by sukotto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've often thought it would be cool if meat.com redirected to Terry Bisson's story, They're Made of Meat

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
  8. Am I in that group? by skinny.net · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a couple offers to buy my domain by 2 different owners and eras of skinny.com. I decided that an easy to remember URL and email address was worth more than they offered. The big bid was $5k, but half in cash, half in services I didn't need.

    I wasn't holding out for the $big, but would take it of course. It was a personal investment, not a financial one.

  9. A great name does not a great site make by Nemilar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest advantage to a generic domain name is that you'll get lots of type-ins; for example, freemusic.com* I'm sure gets hundreds of hits a day, just from (unknowing) users typing it in, hoping for something good.

    But in the new era, sites become popular because they are viral; flickr didn't become popular because of type-ins, it became popular because it offered a good service that people found useful, and it spread.

    --A great name does not a great site make; but a great site can a great name make.-- Heck, just at Google! Verb, noun, and fun to say!

    (*Disclaimer: I have no idea what's at freemusic.com, but I'm guessing it's parked by someone)

    --
    Nemilar http://www.techthrob.com - Visit Me!
    1. Re:A great name does not a great site make by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Talking like Yoda does not a great post make.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:A great name does not a great site make by forty7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's not talking like Yoda, he's talking like Richard Lovelace. To quote: "Stone walls do not a prison make / Nor iron bars a cage."

      Someone please tell me that this is still a well-known quote, even if the source isn't. Please :o)

    3. Re:A great name does not a great site make by jombeewoof · · Score: 1

      It's a quote I haven't heard in years, and I'm relatively young. (under 30 over 12)
      I think the meaning is lost on this generation though.

      --
      Linux Zealots: Smarter than Mac Zealots, but still zealots.
    4. Re:A great name does not a great site make by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      or its even more valid because of this internet thing

    5. Re:A great name does not a great site make by jombeewoof · · Score: 1

      But I don't think this internet thing is really going to catch on.
      I think it's just another fad, remember the pet rock.

      --
      Linux Zealots: Smarter than Mac Zealots, but still zealots.
  10. The Future by carrier+lost · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hello, internet? I'd like some meat, please."

    "Just send it right over. Thanks, bye"

    1. Re:The Future by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      The reality of that future:

      "O HAI; CAN I HAS MEAT PLS? KTHXBYE"

      Tubes are involved in transport, and inexplicably Soviet Russia. The meat is most likely going to be Spam, and you'll get sued if you share it with anyone.

      The Future is awesome!

    2. Re:The Future by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

      And let us not forget the timeless:

      "I for one, welcome our meat overlords from the internet"

    3. Re:The Future by tv_dinners · · Score: 1

      Prior to the overlords:

      i aM eLiTe!! GiVe mE aLL oF yOuR WaReZ d0OdZ!!!

    4. Re:The Future by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're so right. I'd completely forgotten about that epoch. :)

  11. ANUS.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.anus.com/

    Never a greater disappointment in a web site's contents in my WHOLE LIFE.

    1. Re:ANUS.com by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, the people who run anus.com are Neo-Nazi assholes, so the name fits.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    2. Re:ANUS.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Say what you want about the tenets of national socialism, Dude. At least it's an ethos!"

    3. Re:ANUS.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that disappoints you, you'll be in tears when you see penisland.com

  12. Opera by NewsWatcher · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have sometimes wondered what Opera aficionados make of opera.com

    I am sure someone at Slashdot will know how Opera got its name. I kind of guessed that some geek way back bought the domain name thinking it would be worth millions, then in the end used it for a company cause it was cool to have a generic domain.

    Some domain names have been useful though. In Australia people sell ".au.com" domains, which are obviously sub-domains, quite different to Australia's official ".com.au" domains.

    --
    If the pattern goes 9am, 10am, 11am, why isn't noon 12am?
    1. Re:Opera by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Opera is the singular of opus, "work". Easy enough to figure out why the browser uses that name.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    2. Re:Opera by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 5, Funny

      Opera is the singular of opus, "work". Easy enough to figure out why the browser uses that name.

      Is that meant to be ironic? Web browsers are what people use to *not* work.

    3. Re:Opera by setirw · · Score: 1

      ???.com.?? would also be a subdomain, as com.?? is more than just a suffix. Just pointing that out.

      --
      This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
    4. Re:Opera by Varitek · · Score: 1

      Opera used to use opera.no as its primary domain, as they didn't own opera.com

    5. Re:Opera by paintswithcolour · · Score: 1

      Nope, opera is the plural of opus, operis (neuter). But it's also a feminine singular (opera, operae). They do both mean work, but in slightly different ways.

    6. Re:Opera by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Opera used to use opera.no as its primary domain, as they didn't own opera.com


      That must have driven their marketing people batshit.
    7. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the browser that doesn't work is called "Internet Explorer".

      Oh wait, I see what you mean now.

    8. Re:Opera by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Opera? No!

    9. Re:Opera by Mex · · Score: 1

      "I kind of guessed that some geek way back bought the domain name thinking it would be worth millions, then in the end used it for a company cause it was cool to have a generic domain."

      What? No! The Opera Browser used to be hosted at www.operasoftware.com , that's where I used to get it from for years.

      Being forgetful, I did visit www.opera.com expecting to find the browser, but it was just a parked domain name.

      So sometime in the past couple of years, they must have realized opera.com was worth buying. And it must have been - even after I had been using the browser for years, I still erroneously visited opera.com, only to find a generic ad page.

    10. Re:Opera by jfruhlinger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it's the other way around. Opus is singluar, opera is plural.

    11. Re:Opera by McDutchie · · Score: 1

      I am sure someone at Slashdot will know how Opera got its name. I kind of guessed that some geek way back bought the domain name thinking it would be worth millions, then in the end used it for a company cause it was cool to have a generic domain.

      I don't think so, as Opera started out at opera.nta.no and got the opera.com domain only later. The Wayback Machine says the domain was owned by someone else in 1998.

    12. Re:Opera by Kelson · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it was chosen because the word was common to most European languages, so it would sound familiar to anyone in their initial target audience.

    13. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you're a hoot at parties, you over-literal, pedantic cuntwad. And how can you have the singular of something that's already singular (unless it's your brain cell)?

    14. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opera is the singular of opus, "work". Easy enough to figure out why the browser uses that name.

      Not to be a pedant (hey, if I wern't, this wouldn't be slashdot), but you mean that opera is the plural of opus.

    15. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Is that an obscure reference to Die Flietermaus? :)

  13. milk.com FAQ by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love the FAQ milk.com! It's so appropriately craptastastic, I almost feel nostalgic...

    1. Re:milk.com FAQ by kalemba · · Score: 1

      also great to see that milk.com is STILL a blink-free zone!

    2. Re:milk.com FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also contains this, which rules. Waterproof everything, now free with purchase of flying car.

  14. I don't know about you guys but... by Nysem · · Score: 1

    I'm not waiting 3 days or more for milk from milk.com when I could: 1 - Go to any store and be back within 10 minutes, if that. The only shipping and handling that will be done is driving it home and putting it in the refridgerator, and I don't even have to pay for it. 2 - Go learn how to milk a cow and properly process the milk. It can't be that hard, right? These domain names look like a waste of space.

    1. Re:I don't know about you guys but... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Back in 1994 no one was thinking about _selling_ stuff over the internet. Milk.com and Meat.com would have been used purely as informational placards. I can remember how many 1-page index.html websites I made back then for companies that just wanted a presence. The only one I remember that seemed to be doing something useful was a crematorium. (!)

  15. stupid.com by phobos13013 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I must say I never thought of making a /. article out of this one, but since about 1999 which is when I started working on my own computers for hobby, I would use stupid.com as a network test to see if I was online or not and not just loading a cached page (since I only go there when I am testing my network once in a blue moon...) One thing I have noticed about this site, it still feels like I'm in 1999 when I load it...

    --
    ...and it should be known by now
    1. Re:stupid.com by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

      Oh, man! I'm in heaven! I love crap! :)

      Reminds me of Things You Never Knew Existed!

      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    2. Re:stupid.com by presidentbeef · · Score: 1

      ARG! MY EYEBALLS!!

      --
      Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
    3. Re:stupid.com by ALB1 · · Score: 1
      I personnaly would use the site http://perdu.com/ to check my Internet status.

      The site is as bloat-free as can be, and yet is full of meaning :

      Lost on the Internet ?

      Don't panic, we will help you

      * <--- you are here
      --
      ALB1
    4. Re:stupid.com by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      FYI: "perdu" is French for "lost"

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  16. Did you mean "was"? by John+Straffin · · Score: 1

    Well... whatever it is, it's likely been slashdotted off the Internet by now. Well done!

    --
    My contempt for the behavior and beliefs of the two major political parties cannot be adequately expressed in 120 chara
    1. Re:Did you mean "was"? by Paul+server+guy · · Score: 1

      And it should be slashdotted of the net forever, it's one of those damn domain squatters...

      --
      Your Moon, Your Mission, Get involved! http://www.openluna.org
  17. imeem.com = Music Site by illectro · · Score: 1

    imeem is an odd site - it used to be a p2p im + social network + filesharing (hence the im part) but it changed and now it's one of the biggest music sites on the web, with a name which really doesn't have any hint at all about music. The funny thing is, now it's an established player there are a few music startups who're playing on their name (meemix.com is a good example)

  18. naked.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are still a few domains where you get what you pay for =).

    Funny stuff.

  19. apple.com by Tuoqui · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whoever got apple.com must have been sitting on a goldmine.

    --
    09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    1. Re:apple.com by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Except apple.com has been registered for over 20 years!

            Domain Name: APPLE.COM
            Registrar: MARKMONITOR INC.
            Whois Server: whois.markmonitor.com
            Referral URL: http://www.markmonitor.com/
            Name Server: NSERVER.APPLE.COM
            Name Server: NSERVER.ASIA.APPLE.COM
            Name Server: NSERVER.EURO.APPLE.COM
            Name Server: NSERVER2.APPLE.COM
            Name Server: NSERVER3.APPLE.COM
            Name Server: NSERVER4.APPLE.COM
            Status: clientDeleteProhibited
            Status: clientTransferProhibited
            Status: clientUpdateProhibited
            Updated Date: 16-jul-2007
            Creation Date: 19-feb-1987
            Expiration Date: 20-feb-2009

      --
      Be relentless!
  20. Obligatory Anchorman Reference by kellyb9 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Milk was a BAD choice"

  21. Something by GeePrime · · Score: 0

    Something.com always delivered something.

  22. From the article .. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    What, were you going to have a Web site dedicated to your favorite MIDI files?

    But.. but I did have a website dedicated to my favorite MIDI files.. and it was cool .. it *IS* cool. .. and *I* am cool.

    Th.. The Mommm- Mo moldy pp Peaches told me so.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  23. news.com.com by riceboy50 · · Score: 1

    I always found it strange that CNet decided to make news.com the name so they registered com.com and made the site news.com.com. Nowadays news.com.com just redirects to news.com, so they must have figured out that it was weird before. I remember there was much lampooning with com ad infinitum.

    --
    ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    1. Re:news.com.com by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      For a long time, Finnish domain names had to be of the form thecompletenameofthebusiness.fi. This of course led to some incredibly long and stupid names. For example, a magazine called Bisnes.FI got the domain bisnesfi.fi.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  24. Re:New Domain Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How cute! Did you think of that all by yourself?! You're so smart! Someday, you may get to wear big boy clothes!

    Here's a cookie! Now, go play with the other tards. :)

  25. Badge of honor? by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Badge of honor to have an opaque domain name?

    Not so.

    Try registering a domain name that isn't opaque. It's nearly impossible these days - people bought all the obvious ones, and most of the non-obvious ones. Most of them are just domain squatters hoping to get rich, or spamvertising sites.

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
    1. Re:Badge of honor? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Badge of honor to have an opaque domain name?

      Not so.

      Try registering a domain name that isn't opaque. It's nearly impossible these days - people bought all the obvious ones, and most of the non-obvious ones.


      Not true. Flickr, for instance, could have been called SiteForUploadingYourPictures.com. YouTube? VideoSharingPortal.com. OK, so they aren't catchy, but you can't have everything, right?

  26. Codeplex.com by Brobock · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was the original owner of "Codeplex.com" (Not so obvious of a name) before I sold it to Microsoft for a eye whopping $600. The site is now Microsoft's official opensource repository.

    Microsoft created an umbrella company who specifically designed a horrendous website with no links back to them. Even after the research (which I found nothing), I thought I would be a nice guy and sell it to this nobody.

    I know they did that so they didn't have to payout larger sums of money, but I still feel as if I was screwed first hand by Microsoft.

    1. Re:Codeplex.com by lzcd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you feel cheated because you didn't get a chance to cheat someone else?

    2. Re:Codeplex.com by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      but I still feel as if I was screwed first hand by Microsoft. Don't we all..?
  27. Shameless Self Promotion by TeflonTB · · Score: 0

    www.myepeenisbiggerthanyours.com Waiting for this puppy to make me some money!

    1. Re:Shameless Self Promotion by julesh · · Score: 1

      www.myepeenisbiggerthanyours.com Waiting for this puppy to make me some money! Your peen is bigger than mine? OK. If you say so.
  28. Coincidence: DomainFest this week in LA by g01d4 · · Score: 1

    According to the LA Times http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-domain24jan24,1,2623693.story?ctrack=1&cset=true. I too would have thought that searches would have put an end to this annoying type of speculation.

  29. I don't know what it was.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Blocked Site Error.

    http://www.whitehouse.com/ is not available in the Wayback Machine.

  30. Poop.com by cheesyfru · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ahhh.. the good old days, when Poop.com was a shop for fossilized dinosaur dung. Endangered feces, indeed.

  31. ati.com by badzilla · · Score: 1

    Who remembers when this took you to a web page showing a pile of poo and "Automated Turd Industries"... I always assumed it was a shakedown on ATI the video card manufacturer.

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  32. uphill both ways by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    [Yorkshire accent] Luxury! We had to manually scratch the message using an old matchstick onto paper tape - I say paper, it were skin - our own, if dad were in a bad mood - and attach it to t'pigeon. And if it had to go more than thirty miles, you had to attach another message asking t'recipient to attach it to one of his pigeons and forward it on. If it had to do more than three hops, you had to send another pigeon with even more forwarding instructions, or their little legs'd fall off, bless 'em, the poor little buggers.

    But we were happy. [/Yorkshire accent]

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  33. Welcome to zombo com. by OnslaughtQ · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else remember zombo.com (requires flash)? Amazingly the site is still active, and still the same after 10+ years.

    1. Re:Welcome to zombo com. by snoggeramus · · Score: 1

      You can do *anything* with Zombo.com

  34. Re:is slashdot bi curious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the day, CmdrTaco was a total bottom. I think he got religious, turned straight, and got married after Emad died of AIDS. He still takes one in the brown eye every so often, for old time's sake, of course.

  35. Testing a Content Filter with Sex.com by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We always used to use sex.com at my first job to make sure the content filter was working properly... ahh... the days of Microsoft Proxy Server 2.0. At first we did it just because it was the most obvious thing we could think of. Later someone suggested using other adult orieted websites, to which, we decided that if it did go through, we didn't want to have to explain why backdoorsluts.com was on the report that went to management (to the female city manager).

    Its one thing to test a proxy, another to explain to management your choice in samples. :)

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
  36. Like history's artificial turd industries? by kitgerrits · · Score: 1


    Remember when ati.com would change 'names' every once in a while?

    --
    "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
  37. art.com by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reminds me of art.com, a web site I consulted for (different company from current owners of that domain). Before the site specializing in selling posters and prints was launched in the late 90s, the art.com domain belonged to Advanced Rotorcraft Technology, some helicopter tech organization. IIRC, the poster company paid something like half a million dollars for the domain.

  38. Heil Grammar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hmm, I see you haven't become any more coherent over the years, Internet."

    "Just meet me there later. Thanks, bye"

  39. purple hair by Psychofreak · · Score: 1

    Apparently according to Dan on Milk.com, purple hair can upset the balance of the universe!
    Phil

    --
    Laugh, it's good for you!
  40. you just wait... by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 1

    Eventually, www.Kickmycockroach.com will be the only one left. Then I'll make my millions!!

    --
    "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
  41. Domain Gold Rush 2.0 by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suspect that in the next 10-20 years there will be a big rush on people's full names. Currently only web developers and bloggers have their own name as a domain but as the web becomes more and more popular and a part of people's life, they will eventually buy their own name and point it somewhere.

    That's why I own http://www.nealgrosskopf.com/ and grosskopf.name. Having your last name as a domain is nice because it allows you to create sub-domains of family members and create email addresses such as neal@grosskopf.name.

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
    1. Re:Domain Gold Rush 2.0 by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I would love to be able to do that - the problem for me, unfortunately, is that my last name is Hacker. Pretty cool maybe, but though both hacker.com and hacker.net are both currently for sale, there's no way I'm paying for it - it's a bit different from paying $5 for grosskopf.com.

      Some jerk took chrishacker.com years ago. If I use my middle initial, W, then it looks like I'm Chris Whacker.

      By the way - while typing out your name I realized what it means (I know a bit of German) - that's a pretty cool last name. Does everyone in your family have big heads?

    2. Re:Domain Gold Rush 2.0 by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1

      That sucks that you can't buy your last name. Perhaps the hacker.name domain is still available or at least cheaper. When somebody translates my last name I usually use a canned joke of mine and say it's refering to the head below the belt.

      --
      "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
    3. Re:Domain Gold Rush 2.0 by neminem · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't insult Whackers. The CEO of the company I'm working at right now has that last name, and she seems a perfectly intelligent person.

    4. Re:Domain Gold Rush 2.0 by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I figured you must have gotten comments on your name more than a few times - that is a great response though, definitely made me smile.

    5. Re:Domain Gold Rush 2.0 by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Point taken - I will now be more sensitive to Whackers.

      Truthfully, I do sometimes use the W in the hopes of inciting a whacker comment. Only got it once or twice though.

  42. I avoid sites with generic names by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    In fact I myself avoid sites with generic names, as this is a good sign for me that the site is maintained by non-nerds or is full of flashy ads, so possibly there is nothing of interest there.

  43. .net, not .com! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gak! sorry about that. I should have linked here instead!

  44. Should have kept southwest.com... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only I'd had more foresight and kept southwest.com for at least a few more years...

    *sigh*

    The airline tickets were fun while they lasted, though...

    1. Re:Should have kept southwest.com... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Seriously, were you the guy who forced them to plaster iflyswa.com all over everything in sight? Hats off to you brother. I still use that url...

  45. www.clownpenis.fart by nullchar · · Score: 1

    What? Clearly, this will be the only domain name left: http://slackdaddy.org/node/1122

  46. Links by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

    Links.net was the first site with pages of link collections that I used regularly. It was actually the personal site of Justin Hall -- still is, I think -- who was also the first one I recall seeing chronicle events of his life on his site regularly. The earliest capture at the Wayback Machine is an example of what he used to post, but at this point the site was more blog and less link collection.

    I suppose if you want to see what's hosted at that domain now you have to know what you're looking for.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  47. Yahhoo.com by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in 1997 or so I remember going to a computer lab and a TA warned us not to type an extra "h" in yahoo.com (yahoo.com). That site actually made the news because it offered up porn for people who mis-typed.

    The guy was threatened and sued I believe. He even made the news... Anyways I think the owner succumbed and let the domain lapse.

    That's when I found it and registered it for fun. I remember setting up a catch-all email address, and would get thousands of emails (back during when spam wasn't that bad yet). It was interesting reading love letters, business proposals, nude pics, etc...

    But then it got old, so I let it lapse too.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS