Slashdot Mirror


Retrieving Data From Old Amstrad Floppies?

Jeppe Utzon writes "Back in 1987, when I was a teenager in high school still, I spent most evenings, nights and weekends writing small programs in BASIC on my Amstrad CPC 6128. Some of these programs were simple games, some drew graphics, some could help me with math or train me in French — and most were utterly pointless. But I never had as much satisfying fun as when writing those programs — even if no one in my family understood any of it when I proudly displayed the fruits of three sleepless nights of labor. Now, 20 years later, I still have a sealed pack of about 15 disks with all my work on them (along with a few of my favorite games) and I was wondering if it was possible to get the data out somehow so that I could run it in emulation on my Mac. I know of the emulators, but have no clue what would be needed to extract the data — or if it is even extractable after all these years. I realize the chances of the data still being intact are quite low, but I'd like to give it a shot. So if anyone has any pointers it would be greatly appreciated." A large hurdle will be finding a drive to read the Amstrad disks at all.

323 comments

  1. Agreed on finding a drive by fataugie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure that will be the problem. Unless you search on Ebay or Craigslist for someone with one in their basement....good luck. I have a 5 1/4 floppy drive and some disks set aside for the exact same reason.....someday I'll want that info and then I'll be all set.

    --

    WTF? Over?

    1. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by MikeS2k · · Score: 1

      I used to have an old 3" floppy drive (in a ZX Spectrum, not an Amstrad) until it caught fire... :(
      I also have a bunch of old 3" floppy disks that hold BASIC programs, the most complex of which was a wierd "treasure hunt" game (I was only young :-))

      --
      120 characters should be enough for anybody
    2. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Chas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I have a 5 1/4 floppy drive and some disks set aside for the exact same reason.....someday I'll want that info and then I'll be all set."

      If bit-rot doesn't do you in first.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    3. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by gigne · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep, once you find one you are going to need to transfer it onto a PC. I never could find a drive, so I gave up, but here are some links that will help with the task.

      This link http://www.fvempel.nl/3pc.html has some good details on how to splice it onto a PC floppy cable. There are also loads of good links on his page for extracting the data.

      The guys on http://www.cpczone.net/ were really helpful.

      Good luck, you will need it!

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    4. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by snowraver1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What did 5 1/4 drives connect with? ATA/33? Would you even be able to connect a flopppy from a 386 to a modern PC?

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    5. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Many motherboards still have the floppy connectors, but with USB and SATA taking over, I doubt you'll find many new ones still supporting them. My last motherboard (this was 2001) supported the floppy, however it only supported an A: drive, no B: drive. So my dual-floppy reader was half useless.

    6. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by B'Trey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow! Just how much is it worth to you?

      $285.14?

      Seems a bit pricey to me but your nostalgic millage may vary.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    7. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by timbck2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The really old ones (including the Commodore 64) connected via a serial interface.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    8. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      It depends on the platform.

      IBM-compatibles used a special floppy interface - the controller is on the motherboard.

      And, if a modern PC has the hardware to drive a 3.5" floppy, it can drive a 5.25" floppy. So, yes.

      But, the IBM-compatible floppy controller might not be able to handle these Amstrad disks.

    9. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Assuming he means a PC 5 1/4 inch drive, 5 1/4 inch drives connected to the floppy controller, which remained basically unchanged in the switch to 3 1/2 inch drives. Modern motherboards still generally have a floppy controller; if your PC has a 3 1/2 floppy drive, it'll support a 5 1/4 inch drive. My PC actually has a 2-in-1 drive hooked up in it, so I can still read and write 3 1/2 and 5 1/4 diskettes even today.

    10. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Frederic54 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You can plug PC 3 1/2 or 5 1/4 drive on an Amstrad, they use the same interface!!
      http://www.cpcwiki.com/index.php/3%C2%BD%22_%26_5%C2%BC%22_Disk_Drives

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What are the chances someone could hack themselves a disk drive that could read these? It seems like it would be possible to rig up some sort of magnetic scanner that could read the analog magnetic domains on the disk, and convert that to data in software. I'm sure it would take some crazy engineering, and it's probably not worth doing, but it at least seems plausible.

      If this guy can convert an LP to audio with an optical scanner, why not?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Seriously, if you want to actually access that info move it off now and onto newer medium. That whole stack could go on a thumbdrive or CD and be safe for the next 10 years or so.

    13. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by ichthus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That could happen, but I had floppies for an Atari 8-bit that were written 23 years ago. They still worked fine last week...

      then sold my 800, two drives and a bunch of other stuff. I'm now $100 richer, but I have to admit feeling a bit of seller's remorse. A part of me has died.

      But, the point is (damn, I miss that 800 now. Why'd I do it?) *cough* magnetic media seems to be lasting much longer than was expected.

      --
      sig: sauer
    14. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      I've got a combo 5.25"/3.5" drive... fits in a standard 5.25" drive bay. Modern computers do support it, but only one of the drives is seen. I need to set a jumper on the drive to switch between the 5.25" being A: and the 3.5" being A: in order to use it.

      I've used it as recently as a month ago, when it was the only floppy drive I had lying around and I needed to flash the BIOS on a new motherboard so it'd support a quad core processor.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    15. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 4, Informative

      Especially since you can find the whole Amstrad 6128 for 20 Euros.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    16. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Dadoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      But, the IBM-compatible floppy controller might not be able to handle these Amstrad disks.

      If that's a problem, get one of these controllers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CatWeasel. Unless they have a driver already, you'll need to know how to write a program to decode data, bit by bit, but these controllers will read and write nearly anything. I have a MK3, and I was able to get it to read the data on old Ohio Scientific disks.

      Now if I could just find a working 8" disk drive...

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    17. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I have a 5 1/4 floppy drive and some disks set aside for the exact same reason.....someday I'll want that info and then I'll be all set.

      Assuming that the drives haven't died and the disks haven't suffered from bitrot or aging effects on the materials they are made of.
    18. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to be silly but why don't you retrieve that data now, and then some day when you might want it you already have done the hard part of transferring it to a new system.

      Anything i wanted to keep off of my zip drive and magento optical drives i transferred to my hard drive a long time ago. I have accessed all my 3.5 floppies and copied that data as well.

      it got put onto an external HD, and copied onto dvd's.

      When i want my data it is already in accessible storage.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    19. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by halcyon1234 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A better solution:

      Give the floppies to someone else. Then, sue them for copyright infringement. In the filing, insist that all the infringed-upon data is stored on the floppies-- then demand the courts pay to have the evidence recovered...

    20. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I had a 3.5 inch floppy from 1989 that I pull data off just a couple of years ago. They hold up surprisingly well sometimes.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    21. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by vought · · Score: 3, Informative

      You may find old Amstrad drives or sources for the drives at Halted Specialities in Santa Clara.

      http://www.halted.com/

    22. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by vought · · Score: 1

      If bit-rot doesn't do you in first. Agreed. Many of my old high school papers and other valuable info were lost on 3.5" Mac floppies that were used heavily between 1985-1991. An attempt to recover them using a IIci with an Ethernet card connected to a more modern file server was only partially successful, even though the disks were all stored carefully in climate-controlled, low humidity closets.
    23. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by rs79 · · Score: 1

      PCs from the get-go used a NEC 765 chip and are still compatible. What controller did the Amstrad use? This or the WD 187x chip? Or god forbid a proprietary controller.

      I used to write floppy/hard disk bios and drivers and if I can help in any way drop me a line.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    24. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Hatta · · Score: 0

      That might help if he wanted to read PC floppies on his Amstrad. Not so useful when you want to read Amstrad floppies on your PC.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    25. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      according to the linked wikipedia arcticle, it used the NEC chip.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    26. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ultra-ATA? Ha ha... you are so young. IDE didn't even exist yet when the 5 1/4" floppy first appeared. Those were the days of 5 MB hard disk with ST-506 interfaces, 1-5 MHz CPUs, and 40-column monochrome displays. Now get off my lawn!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ah, I just read it.

      In that case, it looks like it's relatively straightforward - find a drive, plug it into a PC, and then find a DOS utility or something to make the disk image. The OS will know it's a floppy drive, but won't know how to properly read or write the disks, hence the special utility. (Alternately, I do recall there being a DOS utility to provide support for unfamiliar drives by giving sectors, tracks, and such to the OS, and it'd sort everything out... then you'd just need to use rawrite to create the image.)

    28. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by ardiri · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.melbpc.org.au/pcupdate/9503/9503article5.htm

      PC Alien. it was a IBM PC DOS based program that would allow you to read older computer disk systems (5 1/4 etc). i remember using it on my 80x86 to read CP/M based disks from my microbee :)

    29. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by arivanov · · Score: 3, Informative

      You most likely do not have a bunch of 3" floppy disks. At least working ones.

      Magnetic media and especially floppies have a limited lifetime. They are not as bad as tapes where you need to rewrite the whole tape once every 6 months or your lose your data. None the less, they are least likely to have survived for 15+ years. The plastic carrier has become brittle, the magnetic media has flaked off and the bits on the media itself have "floated". When you combine all this with no ECC or any other error recovery info your chance of reading something is pretty close to 0.

      That's why I have copied all of the more valuable info of my old floppies and hard drives long ago into a set of images and keep them in an area which gets backed up regularly. Their are puny in size compared to modern data and this way if I ever need something from them I can always get it.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    30. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Funny

      /me passes his working RLL controller over to grampa.

      Layne

    31. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by bonehead · · Score: 1

      I have a 5 1/4 floppy drive and some disks set aside for the exact same reason.....someday I'll want that info and then I'll be all set. If you believe you might want that data someday, you'd be best off to retrieve it immediately (if it's even still intact) and get it stored somewhere safe. That's not much data, it would be much safer in zip archives sent to your gmail account than sitting on old disks that are deteriorating day by day.
    32. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by lgw · · Score: 1

      They are not as bad as tapes where you need to rewrite the whole tape once every 6 months or your lose your data This is true of what - audio tapes? Certainly modern backup tapes are quite durable (which is one reason the drives cost so much), with 30-year shelf lives if kept at reasonable temperature and humidity.
      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

      My old disks for my Commodore 64 are still readable, the few I checked had at most one error, almost all of them didn't have any errors on them. The disks were Elephant Premium 5 1/4 inch disks, about $20 for a box of 10 disks. I bought them in 1984 or 1985. 3.5 inch disk are much more likely to have a problem but even those work great. All you have to do is clean the disk heads and that gets rid of most problem with old disks.

    34. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      You sold an 800 and drives for only $100?!?! Are you crazy? Sure, you can get an emulator and play the games that way but there's no substitute for the real thing. Your regret will only grow...I know. I had a full-sized Battlezone machine in college, sold it because I was moving, and for 20 years regretted selling it. I eventually did get another, cleaned it up and it sits proudly in my basement.

      I also still have my 800, a couple of drives (one of them Happy-enhanced), 850 interface, 300 baud modem (like I have anywhere to call), disks galore, and a little color TV to connect it too.

      I won't even talk about my Atari 2600...geez, I'm a packrat!

    35. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by ichthus · · Score: 1

      It gets even worse. It wasn't just an 800 and a couple of drives. It was an 800, a 130XE, a 1050 (non-Happy), an XF551 drive (somewhat rare) and an XM301 modem. Plus a 410 tape drive, 6 joysticks (2 WICO and 4 original Atari) and a whole mess of games and software (including Batteries Included's Paperclip word processor and Newsroom.)

      I know the XF551 was worth more than $100 alone, but I was feeling generous. Now, I just feel like a chump. (exaggeration)

      Oh well. It was all just sitting in my basement. I believe the guy I sold it to is an actual collector, so it has a better home now.

      --
      sig: sauer
    36. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Ah, the glory days of MFM and RLL drives. Wasn't life more simple before the days of ATA??

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    37. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly, the $285 is much cheaper. ;)

    38. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ultra-ATA? Ha ha... you are so young. IDE didn't even exist yet when the 5 1/4" floppy first appeared. Those were the days of 5 MB hard disk with ST-506 interfaces, 1-5 MHz CPUs, and 40-column monochrome displays. Now get off my lawn! I would have given anything to have a 5 meg hard drive! My C64 had a tape drive that took forever to load.
    39. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by 2short · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "They are not as bad as tapes where you need to rewrite the whole tape once every 6 months or your lose your data"

      What tapes are you talking about? I've dealt with, off the top of my head, 5 types of media that might be called "tapes", and this wasn't close to true of any of them.

    40. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Piece of cake then. If it were me I'd write a quick assembly program to twiddle the chip and read all the tracks and sectors one by one; get the data into somewhere useful then reconstruct the filesystem from there.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    41. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by OS24Ever · · Score: 2, Funny

      At the risk of being labeled troll/flamebait I say to you

      Was she hot or something? That's the only excuse I can think of worth feeling that generous.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    42. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by icke · · Score: 1
    43. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by HungryHorace · · Score: 1

      cpdread under DOS, or dsktrans under Linux, can convert CPC floppies into the .DSK format used by CPC emulators.

    44. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by sjames · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised. The older floppies were recorded at a fairly low density and so had fairly large domains. While the disks probably wouldn't survive long if put back into active use, they may very well have a handful of reads left in them.

      The best bet is to count on 1 last good read. So if anything IS available to read them, make a full copy immediatly and then work from the copies.

    45. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      "I have a 5 1/4 floppy drive and some disks set aside for the exact same reason.....someday I'll want that info and then I'll be all set."

      If bit-rot doesn't do you in first. That's why, over the years, I've always migrated my data. I've got AppleBasic code that was transferred from printed sheets to 5 1/4" floppies to single sided 3.5" floppies, to double sided 3.5" floppies to DSHD 3.5" floppies to a 20MB HDD to a Zip disk to a 350MB HD to a CD to a DVD. I've still got the original media in all cases except the zip disks as well, but the data keeps moving with me. Since all my stuff from pre-2000 fits on one DVD, I have multiple copies of it. I can still pull it out to use under emulation and it all works just fine. Same goes for my old documents :)
    46. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I've got 3.5" disks from 20 years ago that are still perfectly readable, and 8" disks from 30 years ago that are still perfectly readable. And yes, I read them quite often - the 3.5" disks are for a couple of my samplers, and the 8" disks are for my PDP11.

      The drives used in Amstrad PCWs were pretty much indestructible, but they used a rubber drivebelt which stretched and eventually failed. Get a belt kit for a Ferguson 3V23 (really common at one time) and there is one that's almost perfect in there.

    47. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Unless your motherboard has omitted the floppy controller, it should work just fine. As a matter of fact, that old drive from the 386 is probably better built and more reliable than a newer one anyway.

    48. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is finding the right cable with the connectors for a 5-1/4 floppy.

    49. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by quenda · · Score: 1

      IBM-compatibles used a special floppy interface - the controller is on the motherboard. Only for "recent" models. Earlier PC/XT and clones had an ISA card for the floppy controller.

      IBM considered the floppy drive as optional, which made the base price lower. (Did anybody ever buy the tape drive instead?)

    50. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      I have similar hardware and media in a box... but my old prgrams were long since burned to CD ROM (all whooping 31MB worth), and I have never needed the stuff again.

      My real challenge was fining a SCSI IOMega Zip drive for data on 100MB zip drives that I dumped a bunch of stuff onto for "safe long term storage." (I don't own a computer with a parallel port which would have made it easier to find a drive).

      Again, EBay to the rescue!

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    51. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Best advice, really. Almost anything can be emulated if you first get it off the media. You can store thousands of floppies on one dvd, so it's not like it takes up space. It's much easier to keep a few things in the corner of your HDD than a pile of old discs. Sure you can have a little trouble reading the format, but that's secondary. Emulators and software are things you can download on the Internet, downloading ancient drives that connect to ancient interfaces so you can find some ancient communication standard to get them to your current machine is rather difficult.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    52. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by lord+merlin · · Score: 1

      A:\>debug
      -g=c800:5

    53. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you REALLY wanted the info you would have copied it to more modern storage media (multiple times no less) long ago. Admit it, you are reserving it for a 'project' if you get bored someday and have some free time.

    54. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      I have a Sinclair Spectrum +3 and a batch of Amstrad 3" floppies. Last time I checked (a year or so ago), they worked just fine.

      I also have an Atari ST and a bunch of old 3.5" disks from the late 80's. The first handful I tried all worked.

      I know they're vulnerable, and I do have backups on my PC (thank you, emulator programmers!), but those 3" disks the OP has might not be completely ruined just yet.

    55. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Magnetic media and especially floppies have a limited lifetime. They are not as bad as tapes where you need to rewrite the whole tape once every 6 months or your lose your data. None the less, they are least likely to have survived for 15+ years.

      As long as you used good-quality media and kept them cool and dry, they should still be readable. I have some floppies for the Apple II that are pushing toward 23 years old now, and they're readable without errors.

      I wouldn't trust a 3.5" floppy that's been made in the past five years to hold its data for six months, but that's just shoddy quality control by whoever is still making them. 20+ years ago, there weren't eleventy billion factories in China cranking out shoddy goods, so floppy disks (among other things) were usually made to a higher standard.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    56. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by iviagnus · · Score: 1

      Ditto here. I regularly check old diskettes I find at flee markets, and in attics, garages and basements, and 95% of them are readable in their entirety with no signs whatsoever of age. I even have some 8" floppies and reel of high-speed magnetic tape that still function as well as the day they were recorded on back in the 70's and early 80's. To those of you here at /. and abroad who are quick to put forward your "professional" opinion of this man's question, I say keep on spouting doom and gloom rather than admit that media typically lasts much longer than "experts" would have you believe. Or even better, keep your mouth shut if you really don't know what you're talking about. And yes, I do know what I'm talking about. I've worked as a computing professional since 1976, for colleges and such, while many if not most of you were in diapers.

    57. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by PAjamian · · Score: 1
      From the wikipedia article linked by the OP:

      The interface with the drives was a NEC 765 FDC, used for the same purpose in the IBM PC/XT, PC/AT and PS/2 machines.
      ...so that suggests that the IBM compatible floppy interface built into most modern motherboards should be compatible with the drive. Now finding a driver to read the file system may be a different matter.
      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    58. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      dd in linux will image the disk just fine (it will make a bit by bit copy). You will still need to find a driver for the file system to be able read the data, though.

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    59. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by JayAEU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wasn't life more simple before the days of ATA? No, it definitely wasn't! Simple in terms of available technology, yes. Simple in terms of easily getting hardware to work, no!

      Have you ever tried getting a CD-ROM drive to work using a SB16 card's interface along with the crappy DOS drivers from Creative? Ever had fun trying to find an IRQ to use for a new ISA-card controller and finding that none was available? Or how about trying to have more than one harddisk in one computer, it was a nightmare with MFM (or RLL even).

      Thank god we have IDE/ATA!
    60. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      Travan - definitely.

      DAT - highly recommended

      DLT - while it is suitable for long term storage I will run an archive refresh on it every 6 months or so.

      Note - if you definitely _want_ to keep your data you have to refresh it within the period when it is readable with a very high probability of success. So while you can read a DLT from the shelf that is 3+ years old if your job is to keep the data on that DLT alive forever, you have to reread it and rewrite it back every 6 months or so.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    61. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Capitalisten · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about reading your Amstrad floppies on your Amstrad CPC6128 and copying them to the attached PC floppy...? ;-)

    62. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by xalorous · · Score: 1

      Should work in addition to / in place of 3.5" floppy drive. If the drive still works at all.

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
    63. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by sigxcpu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That floppy port isn't going away anytime soon.
      The reason for that is that manufacturers use it for manufacturing tests.

      --
      As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
    64. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't need to read the filesystem in your PC's OS.

      In *nix, dd should do everything that you need... you'd just need to know how to control the drive.

    65. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And the bit-by-bit copy will, most likely, work in an Amstrad CPC emulator. No file system driver needed.

    66. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by tkg · · Score: 1

      Not only that. Many motherboard manufacturers still require that BIOS updates be done via floppy and a dos/win9x bootable floppy at that.

    67. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust a 3.5" floppy that's been made in the past five years to hold its data for six months, but that's just shoddy quality control by whoever is still making them.

      I'll second this. A great amount of my 3" Amstrad floppies can still be read. This is not (at all) the same situation with many of my 1.44 MB HD 3"1/2 floppies, especially the later ones.

    68. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by dcsmith · · Score: 2

      TAANSTAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!

      Yeah, you know... if you're going to live by those acronyms you might want to get them right. It's TANSTAAFL.

      -1 Offtopic
      +1 You know damn well I'm right
      ===
      0 Net moderation

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    69. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by dcsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ultra-ATA? Ha ha... you are so young. IDE didn't even exist yet when the 5 1/4" floppy first appeared. Those were the days of 5 MB hard disk with ST-506 interfaces, 1-5 MHz CPUs, and 40-column monochrome displays. Now get off my lawn! Floppy drives? Hard drives? You young whippersnappers...

      I have a card reader in my basement.

      I see your 'get of my lawn' and raise you a 'And turn down that noise you call music'!

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    70. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my comment was definitely made tongue-in-cheek. Yes, I have "had fun" doing all the things you talked about, and am very complacent using this easier new fangled technology. Thank God the days of typing in all the info manually about hard drives so you could low level format them is over...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    71. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by 2short · · Score: 1

      OK, if you want to intentionally keep one copy of data only, and keep it on magnetic tape, and have it last forever, you should do a refresh every 6 months or so (or just every time you get back from having your head examined).

      But the chances that a particular tape (or 3" floppy) are still good after years of storage are still pretty good.

    72. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by wilhelm · · Score: 1

      Yes, you certainly can; it's just the card-edge connector which has been on floppy cables for time immemorial (though probably not so much anymore). I've got one in my 3.0GHz P4 machine, just for the halibut. Works great! I installed some of my old DOS games, and run them in dosbox, and it's all sorts of fun.

      I've got another drive, just in case this one breaks. :)

    73. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Anne.O.Neimaus · · Score: 1

      Hah, youngster! When I started with PC's (I was on DEC Mini's before that), they didn't even have hard drives of any kind. Only 8-sector single-sided floppies. Before the MFM & RLL stuff came out, we were trying to get 5-Meg SCSI (Still Can't See It) drives to work - mostly unsuccessfuly. The IBM XT, with its built-in 10-Meg hard-drive, was a quantum-leap forward from the original PC.

      And we still managed to get an entire UNIX-V7 clone installed and running on anything with at least 192K of RAM (the Coherent O/S). Before XENIX, even - and WAY before LINUX.

    74. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually many archives use mag tape because of the longevity of the medium. Often, the real problem is finding equipment able to read the tape and can be configured to communicate with modern machines, not the media.

    75. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Having one or two copies only of a particular state of a system is normal for most financial and SCS systems. While a lot of your data a week later or a week earlier is similar it is not the same data. On top of that you may have "risk", contractual and or regulatory reasons which force you to have that particular copy of the data and force you to have a low number of copies for it.

      Frankly, it is no laughing matter and you do not need to have your head examined to do this on casual basis. Alternatively you can leave this all to the tape library. The big tape libraries used in the financial industry have this functionality built in. In fact, they can do this in an unattended mode of operation.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    76. Re:Agreed on finding a drive by sigxcpu · · Score: 1

      That's because the whole manufacturing env is floppy based.

      --
      As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
  2. Find somebody with a working Amstrad. by Chas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Otherwise you're pretty boned.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Find somebody with a working Amstrad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Re:Find somebody with a working Amstrad.
      LOL. That is an oxymoron if I've ever heard one!!

      Alan Sugar the Gerald Ratner of the computer world.... :)

    2. Re:Find somebody with a working Amstrad. by Chas · · Score: 1

      I was trying for a +1 "Funny" modifier.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    3. Re:Find somebody with a working Amstrad. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I was trying for a +1 "Funny" modifier.

      Then you got boned....

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    4. Re:Find somebody with a working Amstrad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you are :*

    5. Re:Find somebody with a working Amstrad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really - there's karma for 'insightful'

    6. Re:Find somebody with a working Amstrad. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      This search should help you find someone with a working amstrad:
      http://www.google.com/search?aq=-1&oq=&num=20&hl=en&safe=off&q=%22how+do+I%22+amstrad&btnG=Search

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    7. Re:Find somebody with a working Amstrad. by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      He could enter the next season of the apprentice and try going straight to the source.

      Those disks were great, they had a little oval hole through which the disk were read and a lever on the side retracted the covering shield inside the disk itself. You can kinda get the idea here but they were way cooler in person.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
  3. Reading 26 year old disks by Steve1952 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I was recently able to successfully read data from my old Apple II+ elephant memory disks from 1981-1982. It worked nearly perfectly, with only a few tracks out of ten disks being unreadable. Of course the old disks only stored about 140K per disk, so the tracks must have been huge by modern standards.

    I used disk2fdi for this. You can get this at: http://www.oldskool.org/disk2fdi

    1. Re:Reading 26 year old disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I see someone else used Elephant disks. :-) That really takes me back to the time when I used the Rana II drives we had on a Syscom II clone at school. After school, I'd go and use one of the kick-ass black Bell & Howell Apples at our local learning center.

      As an in direct result of all that, I've been a professional software developer for more than half my life now. I really should develop a time machine, go back in time and firmly plant my foot in my younger self's ass.

  4. you missed the point. by the+brown+guy · · Score: 1

    Back in 1987, when I was a teenager in high school still, I spent most evenings, nights and weekends working with my 3' floppy
    Fixed that for ya.
    --
    Orbis terrarum est non altus satis
    1. Re:you missed the point. by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

      working with my 3' floppy
      Three FOOT floppy? Hate to to see it when it's not floppy.
      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:you missed the point. by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      I'm not even interested in seeing it when it is floppy!

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    3. Re:you missed the point. by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      They call him "Mandingo"

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    4. Re:you missed the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I figured they'd call him "Tripod".

    5. Re:you missed the point. by v1 · · Score: 1

      3.5" (not really "floppy" - wonder if this is where the term "hard disk" came from?)
      5.25" (ok, that flops)
      8" (not many of us have seen these... and YES, quite floppy)

      if that pattern continues, his 3' floppy must be made of wet noodle.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    6. Re:you missed the point. by NSIM · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised, 3ft floppies did exist! I worked with a company that made a business of retrieving seismic data from very old recording devices, and one of them was basically a 3ft floppy disk! Probably analog recording data, but still, it was floppy and it was disk shaped :-)

    7. Re:you missed the point. by hey! · · Score: 1

      The 3.5" diskettes were made of the same stuff as the 5.25 inch diskettes, and were just as "floppy". They simply had a rigid protective shell protected the floppy bits.

      I have indeed not only seen, but have worked with 8" floppies. On systems that had 8" hard disks They had Shugart interfaces, 8" platters, and boasted a 5 MB capacity, and a nifty transparent Plexiglas case.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:you missed the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, the protective sheath I use for my 8" drive is floppy and the bits are rigid....

    9. Re:you missed the point. by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      3.5" (not really "floppy" - wonder if this is where the term "hard disk" came from?) 5.25" (ok, that flops) 8" (not many of us have seen these... and YES, quite floppy)

      if that pattern continues, his 3' floppy must be made of wet noodle.

      Were you feigning ignorance to make the joke? On the assumption that you weren't... The disk in floppy disks were all made of floppy plastic stuff. That's why they called them floppy disks. The casing around the disk ranged from flimsy (eg 5.25") to RPG-proof (3"), but that's just the casing. The disks in hard disk drives are all made of hard stuff - glass or metal. That's why they called them hard disks.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    10. Re:you missed the point. by dcsmith · · Score: 1

      working with my 3' floppy Three FOOT floppy? Hate to to see it when it's not floppy. (Cue Cialis and/or Viagra SPAM.)
      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    11. Re:you missed the point. by v1 · · Score: 1

      Actually I was trying to point out the difference between the perception the name gives, and the reality. When I tell you I am holding a 3.5" or 5.25" disk, you don't assume I'm holding a "naked floppy". You assume it's in its jacket. A 5.25" in its jacket is still "floppy". A 3.5" in its jacket is not floppy. The only reason people still call 3.5" disks "floppies" is merely a carryover from the 5.25" disk days. Calling a 3.5" disk a "floppy" makes about as much sense as calling a pinto a "motorized carriage".

      It's hard to argue that anyone talking about their 3.5" or 5.25" disks is referring to the naked media, so calling a 3.5" disk a "floppy" is rather nonsensical. My opinion here is it makes more sense to call a 3.5" a "hard disk", but then you get the opposite confusion developing immediately from people that are confusing those with what I believe should more properly be called "fixed disks". But calling a HD a HD isn't going away so there's no point in fighting that one.

      Until they come up with a third unique (and easily acceptable) term to cover the three varieties of media, we will be stuck with two terms for three distinct pieces of hardware.

      I guess I'd prefer people to pick names that describe the outside of the item moreso than the inside. If we go by insides, a 3.5 and 5.25 are both floppy, and a fixed disk is hard, so that works for them I guess.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    12. Re:you missed the point. by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Floppies are going away, so there's not much point fighting about that one either :) Do you get equally annoyed by people calling tape casettes "tapes"?

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  5. In same situation with Apple // disks by athloi · · Score: 1

    Have a ton of old code, writings, etc. on 3.5" disks -- I had the brains to copy over the 5.25" data back when I had an Apple, apparently.

    I don't really want to go buy a retro //gs and all the stuff that comes with it and have it around the house, and am not even sure how to get all of these files to PC or BSD-friendly formats. Some are text. Some are Appleworks.

    I copied over everything I had on a Mac platform, but didn't have a SuperDrive, so couldn't read the // 3.5" disks.

    Anyone up for a LAN party where we all convert our old stuff to current formats?

    Archiving was easier when everything was in universal formats. (No MS-XML formats for me.)

    1. Re:In same situation with Apple // disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone up for a LAN party where we all convert our old stuff to current formats? I was about to tell you how much of an interesting idea that was, then I remembered that I spent most of my highschool weekends having lan parties, not engaging the opposite sex. Never again!

      the captcha was "smells", how topical.
    2. Re:In same situation with Apple // disks by v1 · · Score: 1

      I had a //c with over 300 5.25" and 40 3.5" disks sitting in the basement. Decided to get it out (and all the associated flotsum) and found that one of my main use disks was unbootable.

      At that point I determined that it was just better off to let go of the past, and it ALL went into the trash can the next pickup.

      Probably better that way, and that system certainly didn't owe me anything anymore.

      I'm betting my memories are better to keep than the reality. I'm sure had I been able to boot it up I'd immediately run to check some of my awesome handiwork and say Wow, this is slow and crappy! What was I thinking?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  6. I see a market here by wsanders · · Score: 5, Funny

    In addition to the usual hapless corporate customers needing to restore 10 year old backup tapes at the request of lawyers, forensic data recoverers can now market to nostalgic boomers looking to relive their C64 and Sinclair ZX-80 experiences.

    There is big money here - look at the motorcycle industry, which used to be pitched to outlaws, kids, and the outdoorsy, and is now aiming for the Viagra and $100-bottle-of-wine crowd.

    I still have a huge library of Fortran code on 1/2" tape. If I ever want to see that code again will somebody please kill me.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:I see a market here by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      By "huge" you mean kilobytes, right?

    2. Re:I see a market here by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

      I don't know about big money, but there is definitely room for a business to specialize in this field, given that international shipping and the internet allows the market to be worldwide. Definitely someone could make a decent living at it.

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    3. Re:I see a market here by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      >>> I still have a huge library of Fortran code on 1/2" tape. If I ever want to see that code again will somebody please kill me.

      Yes, after what you said about motorcycle enthusiasts, somebody surely will if the need arises.

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
    4. Re:I see a market here by curmudgeous · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think he was referring to physical dimensions, not capacity.

    5. Re:I see a market here by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      I still have a huge library of Fortran code on 1/2" tape.
      I still have a couple of COBOL program on a 8" floppy, I am wondering what would be the cost to retrieve them!
      They come from a Bull Mini6, like this one:
      http://www.histoireinform.com/Histoire/+infos2/chr4infe.htm

      Damn I'm old :-(
      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:I see a market here by Asuranceturix · · Score: 1

      What do you store that tape for then?

    7. Re:I see a market here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you dont want to see it again, why do you still keep it?

    8. Re:I see a market here by sjf · · Score: 2, Funny

      The data density on an 8" floppy is so low that you can pretty much recover the data with a good quality 4800dpi scanner.

    9. Re:I see a market here by jkua · · Score: 1

      Is that a joke? Because I'm fairly sure you can't actually see the magnetic states on the media with an optical scanner...

    10. Re:I see a market here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume it's his midlife crisis or senility detector.

    11. Re:I see a market here by Nerftoe · · Score: 1

      1. Modify the scanner head to accommodate a reader of sorts
      2. Scan the floppy
      3. Reassemble bits using either Scheme, Perl - whatever.
      3. ???
      4. Profit.

    12. Re:I see a market here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... the best ZX-80 emulators will do it for you :p You just find a way to digitize the tape recording to WAV format, and they will emulate a cassete player that reads from the WAV file. The tape circuitry on the ZX80 was VERY simple.

      In fact, adding some digital signal pre-processing could probably recover just about every ZX80 tape you could still read at all, even at 2400 baud saved by some of the more capable clones, enhancing the FSK symbols for the emulated ROM to pick should be easy.

    13. Re:I see a market here by wsanders · · Score: 1

      By "huge" I meant it took up TWO boxes of punched cards.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  7. Seems pretty possible by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Google found me this emulation site. So emulation seems possible. Dunno about a Mac port, but people are writing code to emulate.

    As for getting the data off, my first idea was to try to find a full system off of eBay. Then you'll need to write something to pull raw sectors off the disks. And a terminal program - something to push the info down a serial line. On the other side hook up your Mac and write something there to collect the data.

    I'm doing something similar with an old Amiga 2000 and my old programming projects.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Seems pretty possible by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Bad form to respond to one's post, but I've found more links:

      Here's an emulator that has disk copy utilities with it.

      This link should find you mac emulators.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    2. Re:Seems pretty possible by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm doing something similar with an old Amiga 2000 and my old programming projects.

      At least there you have the advantage of a computer you can slap a NIC in, and a standardized format for floppy disk images.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Seems pretty possible by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, someone just released a USB controller for the Amiga, that would work in your 2000. You can also get ethernet controllers for those machines, and it will read double density dos format floppies too (720kb ones)... And if you have a hard drive in there, chances are it's SCSI or possibly IDE, which is easy enough to hook up to a modern machine, and linux will read from it.

      Transferring data from an Amiga is relatively easy.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:Seems pretty possible by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You can even put a USB or IDE controller in it, and you can get a pci controller (the catweasel) that will allow a generic pc to read from amiga floppy drives, or you can take the hard drive from the amiga if it has one (almost certainly scsi) and connect it to a modern pc, where linux will read the disk just fine.

      The Amiga is probably the easiest old machine to transfer data from these days, people are even still making new hardware and software for these old machines too.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  8. Re:VMware by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, because VMWare will totally help you run a system that originally ran on a Z80, and used utterly non-standard disks which no other drive will accept.

    --
    If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  9. recovering your old programs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use the google.... I'm sure there's a way.. I also had the same nostalgia, but from years before that on the ZX81. Lots of emulators for that, including hooking up a tape recorder to my iMac to get the programs off! Lots of good fun there.

    Good luck..

  10. Re:VMware by 0racle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well VMware is pretty damn awesome.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  11. Hardware is easy to find by Alioth · · Score: 5, Informative

    It should be trivially easy to do, given a short BASIC program and five minutes on ebay.

    Just search ebay for an Amstrad CPC6128 or a Sinclair Spectrum +3 or an Amstrad PCW. There are still plenty of them around. (I have a Spectrum +3 with a working 3 inch Amstrad floppy drive as it happens, the floppy drive is quite handy for restoring the firmware on the Spectrum ethernet card I'm developing if I blow some non-functional code onto the flash ROM and can't reprogram it any more over ethernet). It would be best to get a CPC6128 - if you get a Spectrum +3 or a PCW you may have to write some low-level software to read CPC formatted discs.

    The CPC, if I remember right, has an RS232 port. Write a short BASIC program to send your data to a PC via RS232.

    Incidentally, the most common fault on the 3 inch Amstrad drives is a broken belt - you can buy new ones from rwap software: http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk/ - while this firm caters for the Spectrum, since the later models were built by Amstrad with the 3in drive, they carry parts for 3in drives.

    The other good news is most floppies seem to hold up well - while the 3in discs don't seem to do as well as 5.25 in discs (I have only one faulty disc in many 20+ year old ones for my BBC micro, but rather more faulty 3in discs - all pre-recorded game discs) - so I suspect your discs will all read fine.

    1. Re:Hardware is easy to find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the maker, Sony 3.5" had a high failure rate, eating homework like mad. Other brands did a lot better, even if dusty.

      I used 'double' my 3.5" as well, punching the extra hole with a pocketknife so the computer would sense 720k as 1.44m. Didn't work well for Sony discs, their quality was already marginal. never had a problem with others though!

    2. Re:Hardware is easy to find by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      The fault on my family's 3 inch Amstrad drive was my youngest sister pushing the foil from an Easter egg into it. I think it was not long after that that I bought my first Amiga.

    3. Re:Hardware is easy to find by Frederic54 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Incidentally, the most common fault on the 3 inch Amstrad drives is a broken belt True, and my latest repair was made using a rubber band :)
      It's easy to find old Amstrad HW in Europe anyway.
      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Hardware is easy to find by HungryHorace · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Spectrum +3 and PCW can read CPC-formatted discs without any hassle, but not the other way around.

  12. Not that hard to find a lot of info by barfy · · Score: 4, Informative
  13. This might help by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    A quick google search found this site. Helpful?

    --
    We'll make great pets
  14. Google is your friend... by klubar · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a number of companies that do media conversion. They can read old floppies, 9-track tapes, tape cartridges and other obsolete media.

    Try:
    http://computer-convert.com/index.htm
    http://www.vintagetech.com/?section=conversion (they also do 7-track tape, paper tape and punch cards!)

    Google: http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=media+conversion+floppy+tape+&src=IE-SearchBox

    However, you may find looking on ebay is cheaper and more fun.

    1. Re:Google is your friend... by Digi-John · · Score: 5, Informative

      Vintage Tech is run by a friend of mine; he has a HUGE warehouse full of various old computer systems here in Livermore, CA. I'd suggest sending an email; he'll probably get back to you within a few hours and could let you know if he can do it. I'd be amazed if he doesn't have an Amstrad system somewhere.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    2. Re:Google is your friend... by magister159 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microsoft Live Search != Google. Google is a noun, and a verb only if you're using Google.com.

    3. Re:Google is your friend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else find it funny that the "Google" link above is actually a link to Microsoft's Live Search?

      Poor Google. Little by little, it's losing its trademark...

  15. Re:VMware by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Informative
    No, Amstrad's ran AMSDOS as the default (load-from-ROM) operating system. They could also load CP/M from a floppy, since they were based on Z80 CPUs (backward compatible with the 8080).

    Floppy-wise, they used a non-standard 3" drive, which may have been made by Shugart. That's going to be the real hurdle.

    My own Amstrad lasted me through to my college years, when I used to use it to solve physics problems. My favorite was getting it to calculate anomalous Zeeman effect splitting profiles.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  16. Jasmin drive by Frederic54 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Easy, I have a standard 5 1/4 drive on my CPC6128. I even did the little hack to invert A and B so now my |A drive is the 5 1/4.

    There is tools in cpm+ to use 800k floppy or transfer files etc. And it uses the same encoding (MFM?) on Amstrad or PC so on the CPC you can read and write PC floppy. PC use 40 tracks by default and Amstrad use 80 tracks for the 800k floppy iirc. Anyway, it works, try to find the schematic to hook a 3 1/2 or 5 1/4 drive on an Amstrad.

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:Jasmin drive by Frederic54 · · Score: 1
      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  17. Find an old system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    You're a programmer, get your hands on some old hardware and take advantage of what wikipedia says:

    Serial port adaptor

    Amstrad issued two RS-232-C D25 serial interfaces, attached to the expansion connector at the rear of the machine, with a through-connector for the CPC464 disk drive or other peripherals. The original interface came with a "Book of Spells" for facilitating data transfer between other systems using a proprietary protocol in the device's own ROM, as well as terminal software to connect to British Telecom's Prestel service. A separate version of the ROM was created for the U.S. market due to the use of the commands "SUCK" and "BLOW", which were considered unacceptable there. Use a serial line to copy the data. I'm sure that it wouldn't be too hard if you can just get a machine that works.
    1. Re:Find an old system by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      He said he did some programming in 1987. That doesn't mean he's actually a programmer now. Any experience he had then would hardly count for anything now, and it could have been just a simple phase he went through, that now he wants to relive.

    2. Re:Find an old system by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're a programmer,

      Uh, didn't he say they were written in BASIC?

      (=I kid. Really. Uh huh.=)

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Find an old system by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      He said he did some programming in 1987. That doesn't mean he's actually a programmer now.

      I am pretty sure he is a programmer nowadays. If he was into programmer as a tenager in 1987 AND he wants to recover what he programmed, he can only be a geek. He is a Slashdotter, for Pete's sake!

      --
      So say we all
    4. Re:Find an old system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a programmer,

      Uh, didn't he say they were written in BASIC? (=I kid. Really. Uh huh.=) That's nothing, I hacked the CPCs at Dixons!

      10 print "lol, dixons"
      20 goto 10
  18. Once the hurdle of finding a drive is cleared.... by Mipsalawishus · · Score: 1

    As I'm not a betting man, I would still have to say your chances of getting the discs to read after 21 years aren't very good. Not knowing what conditions they have been exposed to, it's really hard to say what to expect. Magnetic media can have a good shelf life in the right conditions (away from magnetic fields, heat,etc..)
    Best of luck though. If you manage to get your programs, maybe you could post them on sourceforge!

  19. Iron filings and a scanner by flyingfsck · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sprinkle the disks with iron filings and scan them on a flatbed scanner. Then write a new and absolutely pointless program to retrieve the data from the scans.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Iron filings and a scanner by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Absolute genius. There's a special place in heaven for you.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Iron filings and a scanner by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This actually isn't as insane or absurd as you wanted it to seem. There are actually products like MagnaView that have very tiny magnetic particles suspended in a solvent, and will clearly image the magnetic information on a mag tape, credit card magnetic stripe or even a floppy disk. And considering that someone has already written a program to play analog audio off of a scan of a vinyl record, extracting the data from a floppy "developed" with MagnaView shouldn't be that hard. Still,I would suggest tracking down an original Amstrad and just reading the disks. They were not extremely common in the US and might be harder to find here, but were pretty common in Europe. I don't know where the original poster is. Once you can read the data, the next trick would be to get it to an emulator. No problem if the Amstrad has the serial port option, if it does not there are still plenty of ways to get the data to another system, with options including flashing the screen and picking up the data with a webcam, encoding it as audio and capturing it with a soundcard, and even printing it out in a dense binary form and then scanning it back in again.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    3. Re:Iron filings and a scanner by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      This actually isn't as insane or absurd as you wanted it to seem.

      You see, the humor comes from the fact that his solution isn't 100% out of the realm of possibility. All geeks have been guilty of such pointless and absurd nostalgia at some point, which is why the mental image of someone actually devising and executing such a scheme to restore worthless data from a long-obsolete system is pretty funny. Or at least, it was funny until it's explained...

    4. Re:Iron filings and a scanner by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Back in the reel-to-reel tape days a similar approach (can't recall if it used iron oxide, or laser printer paper to capture the image) was used to visually read the contents of damaged or worn tapes that could not be read from the tape reader.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  20. Re:VMware by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    Then that is not the amstrad I was thinking of. The Amstrad I was thinking of was DOS based and had a 8088 in it. I don't even know if VMware will run a 8 bit system anyway. It was just a guess.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  21. Data recovery services by spazdor · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you get desperate, there are data recovery services you can hire (at pretty ridiculous expense I'm sure) that can retrieve data from busted hard drives and floppies. Given that they have to do things like mount naked platters and floppies and read them as-is, it seems likely that their gear can accomodate a range of different sizes and sector layouts and whatnot.

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    1. Re:Data recovery services by halcyon1234 · · Score: 3, Informative
      A note: Before you start looking down this path, be sure think long and hard about how much your nostalgia is really worth.

      I recently did just this with all my old 5 1/4" disks. I had about 200 disks full of old games, programs, and some Basic work I did. The whole "514" project took me an afternoon, and 34.6MB of space. I was surprised about how many of the disks were still viable after 10-15 years.

      Except for one particular brand name of disks. I don't recall which one-- but let me tell you this: Of the 200 disks, there were maybe 4 I really, really wanted to recover. The ones that had some Basic programs and animations I had done. And wouldn't you know, the only three that were corrupt were from that pool of four.

      I still have them, just in case. But a cursory glance at data recovery places let me know that they'd charge anywhere from $75-$300 per disk. If they don't get it right (or if they're a crappy place as screw up the procedure) the data is for-sure gone forever.

  22. The media may be dead by now by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    I've attempted to read 10-year-old 3.5" floppies and had pretty bad luck. The magnetic media became unreadable, at least on my standard equipment (which I tested and works just fine with fresh media). Perhaps a sophisticated lab could get the data off, but I sure couldn't. You may find that your disks are unreadable by now, even if you had equipment capable of reading them.

    1. Re:The media may be dead by now by NotInfinitumLabs · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. He says that the disks were sealed for the past 15 years. If he also stored them in a cool, dry place, there's a good chance that the media is still good. I've recovered data from ~15 year old floppies that have been stored like this.

    2. Re:The media may be dead by now by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that. I was going to fire up my old Amiga 3000 a few years ago. One that had the original kickstart on a disk instead of rom. Dug out the disk and blew some brown dust out from under the floppy then I realized that brown dust was the magnetic media flaking off. I actually blew away my own data.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    3. Re:The media may be dead by now by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Not necessarily. He says that the disks were sealed for the past 15 years. If he also stored them in a cool, dry
      >place, there's a good chance that the media is still good. I've recovered data from ~15 year old floppies that >have been stored like this.

      I have a stupidly large C64 collection that's been stored in a barn in Texas and then in a garage in Arizona, since the mid-90s. Probably *because* I don't care, I have yet to see the first failed disk.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:The media may be dead by now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to fire up my old Amiga 3000 a few years ago. One that had the original kickstart on a disk instead of rom.
      That'd be an Amiga 1000, not a 3000.
    5. Re:The media may be dead by now by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      That is so incorrect my friend. True the Amiga 1000 did need a kickstart disk but so did the early 3000's. Mine was one of the earlies 3000s. The main advantage was that kickstart image could be written to the HD instead of needing the floppy every time.

      I could have gotten 3.1 on a ROM chip but I never did. Booting off of the HD didn't add any real time to the load.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    6. Re:The media may be dead by now by Panaflex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work at a recovery company. We "baked" sticky media in an "oven" (the kind you see in biolabs) before attempting recovery.

      I've had great luck with the 3M disks.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    7. Re:The media may be dead by now by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I've attempted to read 10-year-old 3.5" floppies and had pretty bad luck. The magnetic media became unreadable, at least on my standard equipment (which I tested and works just fine with fresh media). Perhaps a sophisticated lab could get the data off, but I sure couldn't. You may find that your disks are unreadable by now, even if you had equipment capable of reading them. QA on 3.5" disks went rapidly down the toilet some time around 1996. Double (as opposed to high) density disks seemed much better, and I think I recall seeing one corrupted 5.25" disk which would have been made on a BBC - not sure about the density but I think it was around 360K.

      These 3" disks were obsolete by the mid 1990's. Chances of recovery are probably rather better than you think.
    8. Re:The media may be dead by now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My media stored in a cool dry place was worthless after 10 years. Even factory formatted still shrink wrapped disk needed to be reformatted before they could be used. Sure you can recover some data, but not a very good percentage.

    9. Re:The media may be dead by now by rbrewer123 · · Score: 1

      Just last week I decided to try and grab the data from my 3.5" MS-DOS floppies from the late 80's and early 90's. I found about 60 floppies that seemed likely to have interesting data. On loading them in my older Linux laptop (that had a 3.5" floppy drive) I narrowed it to about 15 floppies that I wanted to save. I did a standard file-by-file copy of those disks. Out of the 15 disks containing several hundred files, there were only about 3 files with read errors. For most of those years the disks were stored indoors in normal living space. For the last 3.5 years they had been in the attic, subject to 100+ F temps in the summer and sub-32 F temps in the winter.

    10. Re:The media may be dead by now by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Depends on how the discs were stored, as well as the quality of the actual discs. The Amstrad CF2 discs weren't bad. Older 5.25in discs are usually better still. Probably helps that the density is low (either single or double density only).

      Nearly all of the 20+ year old 5.25in discs for my BBC Micro still work, and the two that didn't, only one was truly dead - the other one usable after a format.

      The trouble is even 10 years ago, the quality of 3.5in discs had taken a real dive.

    11. Re:The media may be dead by now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Early? My God, a Kickstart 1.4 machine is almost a prototype. At least you can just plug a pair of 2.04 or 3.1 ROMs into the empty sockets if your discs have gone up in dust.

    12. Re:The media may be dead by now by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Dude.. My Amiga came over on the Mayflower. It was the first computer off the boat.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  23. Classic Computing mailing list by Digi-John · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just sign up for one of these (I suggest cctalk) and ask around. Maybe somebody can convert them for you, maybe somebody else has an entire Amstrad system that they'll let you have cheap.

    --
    Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    1. Re:Classic Computing mailing list by DarkMachine · · Score: 1

      What self respecting nerd would ever part with a working Amstrad system!!?? Mine is right on the shelf with it's disks and printer, next to the Timex Sinclair and C64. To be brought out on special occasions, powered up and shown to other folks who covet my collection of ancient dusty computers.

  24. Google works by DirtyFly · · Score: 1
    Its wonderfull the results you get whey you type :

    read amstrad cpc disks on a pc

    onto google :)

    http://www.google.pt/search?hl=pt-PT&q=read+amstrad+cpc+disks+on+a+pc&btnG=Pesquisa+do+Google&meta=

  25. What about NeXT optical disks? by LinuxParanoid · · Score: 1

    Anyone know where I can get an old NeXT optical disc converted to a PC-accessible modern format?

    I googled around, sent emails and filled in 'contact us' forms on a number of archive-retrieval websites and never got any response back.

    1. Re:What about NeXT optical disks? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Purdue University Computing Center used to have a bunch of NeXTs with optical drives. You might be able to find someone there that could do the conversion for you for a small fee.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  26. A Quick Google Search Turned Up This by fyrie · · Score: 4, Informative
  27. Re:VMware by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    Well there you go then. Problem solved. Here are a couple of free sarcasm tags for you too.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  28. solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is possible to connect an Amstrad 3" floppy drive to a PC computer. Both CPCs and PC computers use the same type of floppy disk controller. You can get a suitable drive by purchasing an old Amstrad PCW word processor device. Here is one application for reading the disk format on a Windows system:
    http://www.cpcmania.com/cpcdiskxp/cpcdiskxp.htm
    Several other similar tools exist.

    Here are instructions on connecting a 3" drive to a PC:
    http://www.amstradcg.nl/econvers.html#3PC

  29. I assume we are talking about the 3" disks by daffmeister · · Score: 5, Informative
    In which case, I did this just last weekend. It's not easy though. Requirements were:
    • 1 Amstrad PC (with floppy drive)
    • 1 PC running Window 98 with parallel port
    • 1 copy of Locolink, which includes a parallel cable and transfer software

    In my case we had an Amstrad PCW8256 in full working order, so that covered reading the disks. The Locolink software is hard to come by but I picked up a copy on E-Bay. It's designed for transferring and converting Locoscript files but will transfer other files as well just fine. It only works with Window 98 on the PC side though.


    If you don't have an actual working Amstrad then your best bet is probably finding a hacked-up 3" drive that you can connect to a PC. You might be more likely to be able to purchase the whole computer.


    If you're in the UK there are services that will transfer the files for you for 10GBP a disk. Here's a list of them. In the US, try here.


    Good luck!

  30. If You're REALLY Serious... by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    and independently wealthy, you can contact Kroll Ontrack in Minneapolis, Minnesota. They are the folks who amazingly recovered the data off a hard drive from the shuttle Columbia wreckage. Based on that performance, the Amstrad diskettes would be a breeze for them.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
    1. Re:If You're REALLY Serious... by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      And probably 30x more expensive than any other guy

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    2. Re:If You're REALLY Serious... by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      See my previous post on Ontrack.
      They can recover data from space shuttles, but not from beer. Unless you have an exploding space shuttle I wouldn't be too sure they can get the data. :P

  31. My experience of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There was a pcw to pc copy cable and software can't remember its name the DOS end of it was pretty crappy, basically serial transfer, so slow.
    Find an old Amstrad pcw word processor more common than the cpc 6128 and can read the disks and then the challenge is to find the cable (easy to make) and software(hard to find).
    I did this many years ago to get someone's book off a Amstrad they had spent years writing on one, obviously the publisher couldn't read the disk so I was asked to help.
    The main problem you may find is the rubber belts on the drives themselves loose there spring and then the drive doesn't spin at the right speed and doesn't read. Invest in a large selection of elastic bands :-)
    We managed to find someone willing to sell the software, cable and an old pcw to do the job, several donor pcw's and elastic bands later and it was transferred.
    It might be easier to find a Amstad enthusiast who still has the kit to do it for you.
    G

  32. The drive is the hard part by Megane · · Score: 1

    Even though I never had an Amstrad to recover disks from, I somewhat regret not having bought one of the three or four I saw at thrift stores over the years. As long as the interface is compatible with the standard Shugart interface (which it should be), you could hook it up to a Catweasel card. I did buy a few Amstrad disks when I found them (they were small), but by the time I cared, I didn't see any more of the computers.

    But I was a TRS-80 guy back in the day, so all my old disks are already imaged thanks to the Catweasel. And thanks to Radio Shack using standard FM/MFM disk controller chips. (I've also played around with code to read Apple II and Commodore disks, and Commodore's GCR doesn't re-sync very well.)

    Basically, there were three 3" formats back in the day fighting for who would be the next floppy drive. There was one which got used by some typewriters and the Famicom Disk System, another which got used by the Amstrad, and... the Sony 3 1/2" disk which got used by Apple and HP at about the same time in 1983-1984.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  33. BULLSHIT ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got the feeling that this guy's story is too cozy and perfect . . . the kind of thing we are likely to relate to . . . I say this guy is some consultant somewhere trying to charge someone an arm and a leg for doing this while at the same time trying to get us to do his homework for him . . . for free . . .

    1. Re:BULLSHIT ALERT by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      Well, it doesn't hurt to help him out here. Others may want to know the same thing, and can use the answer to do it themselves.
      Even if he is charging soemone else, I don't see how what he's asking here is any different than going to a message board and asking questions. (other than the bigger better audience)

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    2. Re:BULLSHIT ALERT by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

      I would agree, except for the fact that I personally can't reward dishonesty . . .

      --
      SARAVA!
  34. Ebay... by Plautius · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ebay has them galore but not exactly cheap:

    Just the drive (got an old AT style PC) here: Ebay!

  35. Catweasel by KC1P · · Score: 1

    I don't know what kind of interface the 3" drives have, but if it is or can be adapted to the usual 34-pin SA400-style interface then one of the Catweasel floppy controllers (made by Jens Schoenfeld A.K.A. Individual Computers) might be your friend. They can make reading almost any format a Simple Matter Of Programming(TM).

    And don't listen to people telling you the media deteriorate. The older the better, really -- I've lost data on 3.5" floppies more and more lately (quality seems to be going down), but my old 8" and 5.25" disks read just fine. Same with 1/2" tape -- if only the drives were as reliable as the tapes.

  36. Re:Once the hurdle of finding a drive is cleared.. by Megane · · Score: 2, Informative

    If a floppy is properly stored and kept indoors, it should still be readable after all that time. I have some TRS-80 floppies from the early '80s which read just fine a couple of years ago with a Catweasel board. There were some read errors, but those were probably there back in the day. So 25 years is certainly not unreasonable.

    But it's still not too hard to find 5 1/4" floppy drives in relatively good condition. Good luck finding an Amstrad drive. Is there even an Amstrad users group in the US?

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  37. Might be a stupid idea, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could perhaps write a program on a working machine with the old 3'' FDD to output the bytes from a file to any available serial/parallel ports.
    My old PCW8256 has the old 3'' form factor FDD, but is currently up in the loft, so I can't be too sure, but I believe that whilst there are no serial ports on it, there is a port for the printer that came bundled with it. Assuming that the printer port is indeed a parallel port, albeit perhaps in a different form factor, (i.e DIN instead of DB25), you could build a custom cable to link the data pins on the old machine, to any more modern machine that had a parallel port, then write software to run on the modern machine, to receive the data transmitted. A serial link could also be possible.
    If the old machine has no output ports, but has a multi-tone speaker, you could even write code to emit a different tone from the machine for each character, or byte of information that is read from a given file, record it, then write the code to 'decode' it on a more modern machine, having inputted the sound, as say, a wav file.
    You could even get the old machine to emit different colours or flash the screen, record that with a webcam, and get the data across that way, slow and complicated, but doable.
    I'll be interested to see what other suggestions are given, as no doubt I'm making this horribly overcomplicated ;)

  38. I HAVE a drive...... [somewhere up the attic] by Qwrk · · Score: 1

    I've always kept odd stuff in boxes, knowing that one day there'd be someone like you yelling out for one. Once I get the kids to bed I'll start rummaging through them umpteen boxes.... BRB

  39. Mine had audio tapes. by stephdau · · Score: 1

    My Amstrad had a standard audio tape deck, not floppies... That sure made it easy to copy software: just pop it in your dual-tape boombox. ;)

  40. i know what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still trying to find something compatible with my 8 inch Wang, so far the only thing available is Cowboy Neils mom.

  41. The advantages of punched paper tape by mbone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My first programming was on punched paper tape, which I can still read. I am not saying I have a machine that could read it, but at least I can look at the punches and figure out what the characters were.

    When I was in grad school, there was some data stored on punched paper tape, stored fan-folded. The tape had dried out and cracked where the folds were. (The cracks would be in the middle of a byte, especially a high one, as they would have more holes punched in them.) They wanted to save the data, so they hired a under-grad to spend all summer sending the tape through a reader, one 4 foot section at a time, figure out what the byte was where the crack was, type that in, and then proceed to the next 4 foot section. I still think that that must have been the worst IT job ever.

    1. Re:The advantages of punched paper tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      _I still think that that must have been the worst IT job ever._

      That, sir, is a *very* big call.

  42. Amstrad PCW/CPC and Spectrum used the same disks by giafly · · Score: 1

    The Amstrad PCW, Amstrad CPC and Sinclair Spectrum used the same disk drives. For example Level 9 published triple-format (!) disk versions of their adventure games that could be played on all the above. If you're looking to buy a second-hand computer to read your disks, this may increase your options.

    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  43. Floppy discs... by actionbastard · · Score: 1

    PHHHT!

    I have some of my first BASIC programs that I wrote -using my high school's PDP 8- on punched paper tape and the old Bell 212 terminal to go with it.

    Now get off my lawn, damnit!

    --
    Sig this!
  44. Re:VMware by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amstrad did make some IBM PC compatibles, but that'd be too easy - IIRC, they used standard (well, as standard as you can call it back then) 360 kiB 5.25" floppies, too.

    And, all VMware does is virtualization (not emulation) of an x86 PC.

    This guy needs to find a working Amstrad that can read his disks, and then use it to create disk images. I don't know if there's a utility to automatically do that for the Amstrads, though. (For Apple IIs, it's stupid easy to make disk images, thanks to ADTPro and cheap serial cables.)

  45. Proposed solution by athloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    LAN party at noon, then pubcrawling to midnight engaging the opposite sex?

  46. Get yourself the real thing on Ebay France or UK by stephdau · · Score: 1

    Your best bet would be to go native and get yourself one of the old Amstrad on Ebay France (or UK). http://search.ebay.fr/search/search.dll?from=R40&_trksid=m37&satitle=amstrad&category0=

  47. Re:VMware by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    VMWare will totally help you run a system that originally ran on a Z80

    Just to be snarky for a moment, the Z80 *was* a clone of the Intel 8080...
  48. Simplest way... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try emailing the people who write those emulators you mention.

    --
    No sig today...
  49. "The CPC has an RS232 port." by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Yes, but does your modern PC...?

    >"rather more faulty 3in discs - all pre-recorded
    > game discs"

    If you saw how they duplicated those disks you wouldn't be very surprised...

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:"The CPC has an RS232 port." by pwroberts · · Score: 1

      Yes, but does your modern PC...?

      That's why they sell USB serial ports nowadays :)

    2. Re:"The CPC has an RS232 port." by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, none of the Amstrad CPC464, CPC664 and CPC6128 had serial ports anyway. A serial interface was an optional extra that plugged into the back.

    3. Re:"The CPC has an RS232 port." by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      "rather more faulty 3in discs - all pre-recorded game discs"
      If you saw how they duplicated those disks you wouldn't be very surprised...

      Now you've got me curious. Stacking up multiple platters in one casing?

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  50. Druthers by Dunx · · Score: 1

    Oh how I wish I hadn't thrown away my Amstrad CPC 464 three years ago, or I would have been able to actually help. I had an external 3" disc drive that was connectable to a PC in lieu of a 3½ floppy.

    There just wasn't any way I was going to be able to get it back to the US from my parents' attic in Britain and I didn't have time to dispose of it properly on eBay, so off to the skip it went.

    I feel sad.

    --
    Dunx
    Converting caffeine into code since 1982
    1. Re:Druthers by richardwatson · · Score: 1

      Me too! I had one, except no external drive. I remember much fast forwarding and rewinding all over the tape to get to specific bits of my terrible handmade drawing program to load...

      FYI, the guy who made harrier attack just released a 3D version a few months ago. It seems a bit of a mad idea, but I wish him well. Durrell Software, remember that?:
      http://www.durellgames.com/

      --
      http://www.tudumo.com - todo list with tags
  51. Spectrums with disk drives were very rare... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Amstrad put the disk drive on the Spectrum after they bought the company but the Spectrum was already in its death throes. I doubt they sold more than a few dozen of them.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Spectrums with disk drives were very rare... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Amstrad put the disk drive on the Spectrum after they bought the company but the Spectrum was already in its death throes. I doubt they sold more than a few dozen of them. Despite it having dated very badly since its launch (IMHO, and even with the 128K enhancements), the Spectrum was still doing reasonably well around that time.

      IMHO, the problem with the +3 was that it was basically just too expensive and came out around the same time (late 1987) that the Atari ST came down to 299 pounds.

      The Spectrum's appeal was that it was relatively cheap and had a vast, established base of tape-based software sold through countless shops and copied/exchanged via every playground in the land. The +3 cost (according to Wikipedia) 249 pounds when it came out... I remember it selling at its later price, 199 pounds, but that's still closer to ST territory than that of the original Spectrum. Who'd want a +3; essentially a 128K Spectrum with a nonstandard floppy drive and little software, when you could buy an Atari ST, even if it was still a bit more expensive?
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  52. CPC Websites by bestinshow · · Score: 1

    Ask about on Usenet - comp.sys.amstrad.8bit, and on CPCZone http://www.cpczone.net/ and look on the CPC Wiki http://www.cpcwiki.com/index.php/Main_Page.

    People there have working CPCs, and setups to get disk images from the CPC into a .dsk file on the PC.

  53. I'd just... by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Informative

    keep looking on ebay for an old cpc 6128 or PCW-8256 or PCw-8512 (they all had the same 3" Hitachi microdrive). You can probably pick one up for like 10 uk pounds or something,

    The Hitachi 3" Microdrive which was intended to be a direct competitor to Sony's 3.5" format. (Unfortunately for Amstrad the Sony format was the one that won-out in the PC world). Because of that I'm guessing the possibility that the 3" Microdrive has a PC-compatable connector may be high (but I don't know for sure).

    Of course even if you got the drive connected to your PC OK still the problem would still be to get your PC to recognise the AMSDOS file system on the floppy.

    I guess another option (if you get your hands on an amstrad computer) would be to write some little program that implements a simple file transfer protocol via whatever ports (RS-232 etc) that are available on the amstrad you get, then connect it directly to a regular PC via a homebrew cable.

    1. Re:I'd just... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for Amstrad the Sony format was the one that won-out in the PC world From what I've heard, Amstrad chose the 3" format because they got a job lot of the drives cheap- I assume because it had already clearly lost the format war. So the use of a nonstandard drive was probably intentional and down to Amstrad being cheapasses rather than being unfortunately caught out.

      Course, I'm willing to bet that after having to track down and then shell out for the rare (and hence expensive) 3" discs, the owners didn't appreciate the choice.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:I'd just... by fistynuts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course even if you got the drive connected to your PC OK still the problem would still be to get your PC to recognise the AMSDOS file system on the floppy. Not true. It's much easier to create an image of the disk, then load that image into an Amstrad emulator. The Amstrad already reads AMSDOS quite well.
      --
      "You heard the man, Tubbs.. get undressed."
    3. Re:I'd just... by fistynuts · · Score: 1

      Actually that's false. When the Amstrad first came out, 5 1/4" drives were the norm. 3 1/2" drives were available but expensive and not at all the standard.

      --
      "You heard the man, Tubbs.. get undressed."
    4. Re:I'd just... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Actually that's false. When the Amstrad first came out, 5 1/4" drives were the norm. 3 1/2" drives were available but expensive and not at all the standard. That's true, but it's not the point I was making. Blu Ray is still a minority product at the present time, and ordinary DVD remains the standard. However, we *do* know that if hi-def discs take off, then the standard is certainly NOT going to be HD-DVD! Even if Toshiba hadn't thrown in the towel, it was clear a while back that HD-DVD was *not* going to win.

      My understanding is that the major players in the industry had already moved towards the 3.5" standard by the time Amstrad's drive system came out.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  54. [SPS] Working solution for You. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask SPS team http://www.softpres.org/
    They already developed 3" drive interface:
    http://www.softpres.org/article:hard:connect_3inch_drive_to_amiga

  55. ...If you love it, bring it with you by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

    My first computer was a 286 running DOS, so I'm not in quite as much trouble WRT finding machinery to read my old code. That being said though, I've been religiously bringing my old data forward as different storage formats have become obsolete. My 5.25" disks got copied to single-sided 3.5", then dual sided 3.5", then CDs (briefly) Zip Disks and now I'm in the process of moving my archives to DVD. I'll be amazed if any of this crap is ever of interest to anyone but me, but I find it fun to go back from time to time and revisit some of my old favorite games and (terrible) code I wrote as a kid.

    --
    Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
  56. You can never go back... by Aaron32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and if you try, you'll ruin your fond memories. I've done it a few times and have been thoroughly disappointed. Like any self-respecting computer geek I frequented the bulletin boards before Al Gore invented the Internet. I'd play co-op text adventure games with friends and be online for the majority of my waking time. I had a chance to buy one of the BBS' I would play on and I tried to get some old friends to get back with me so we could relish in the glory days. It was awkward, not that much fun, and really ruined my memories of the fun I'd had. Just enjoy your fond memories and don't try to recreate the situation/atmosphere/fun you had as a younger person. You'll be disappointed.

    1. Re:You can never go back... by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid I'll have to disagree with you. I've got several vintage systems hooked up in my hobby room and it's very nice to fire up some of my old favorite games. Besides it's a hoot seeing my Amiga 1000 boot up on my HDTV :)

    2. Re:You can never go back... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Tho i dont do games, I agree, and it looks like he had the wrong sort of BBS buddies if they feel 'awkward' around each other today.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:You can never go back... by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      I've found the same thing. I suppose it's for the best that my old CoCo3 died.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  57. Old Amstrad Computer by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I remember rightly the drives were integrated into some models of Amstrads. Given this if you can find an old Amstrad you should see if you could create a serial link between the computer and your Mac. After that its a matter of using kermit or some other serial transfer protocol.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Old Amstrad Computer by jamesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Amstrad 6128 did not have an integrated serial port, although one was available. The only thing it had was a parallel port, and that was only 7 bits (+1 bit for strobe). I wrote a bit banging transfer protocol (4 bits at a time - w00t!) to move a heap of data from the Amstrad to an Amiga. Not too fast but we're only talking something like 160kb/disk. I was about 12 at the time too :)

      Those disks are pretty robust so there's a good chance you won't have too much of a bitrot infestation. In the ~5 years that we owned one we had a single disk failure, and we were on a dirt road and the dust just got everywhere.

      Finding a working drive or 6128/664 might be your biggest hurdle though, as most people have pointed out. You might need to get a bit creative... I wonder what the track width is? Could a 1.44" floppy drive be butchered to be able to read a disk? You'd have to crack open the disk case to have any luck though.

      If only your stuff was stored on tape. I don't have it any more but I wrote a little program years ago under Linux to read amstrad tapes via the sound card. Only took a few hours. Tapes might be more likely to have bitrot by now though, unless you rewound them regularly :)

  58. Re:VMware by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    Well I'll be! I always thought that Z80 sticker meant it came with a copy of Zork 8.0
    Glad I never got one. I would have been SO pissed! :-)

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  59. I know how you feel by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    I have long since thrown out my commie64. I had roughly 200 5 1/4 floppies loaded with c64 games and other apps. I was hoping to sell them on ebay. But my parents tossed out the floppies a few weeks ago.

    now all I have left is that old star micronics dot matrix printer for c64.

    I need to get rid of that thing.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:I know how you feel by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      No, you need to buy my extra 64C :)

      Parents? Hmmm

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:I know how you feel by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      I left a ton of stuff at my parents house when I moved out and got married.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    3. Re:I know how you feel by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Ah.. i was worried you were one of those 30 somethings still living in your parents basement :)

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  60. Re:VMware by JesseL · · Score: 1

    Snarky or not, you're wrong. The Z80 was backwards compatible with the 8080 instruction set, but it had a lot of it's own changes and extensions. Z80 code will likely not run on an 8080.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  61. Lileky unreadable. by gweihir · · Score: 1

    I copied my old Atari ST floppies (DD 3.5") to MOD for archiving. About 5 years after writing, a significant fraction had errors and some were unreadable. I expect that for most of these you will need professional data recovery that can read analog and to advances DSP vodoo to recover the data.

    If you find a working drive and manage to get information about the encoding, you can also build your own read amplifier and digitizer (or buy one, warning, not cheap for the speed required) and try the DSP yourself.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  62. Re:VMware by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia disagrees with you. It was designed to be binary compatible with the 8080, but it added significant features such that the binary compatibility would not go in the other direction.

    In any case it's utterly irrelevant because x86 is not binary compatible with the 8080, so even if the Z80 were a perfect clone of the 8080 VMWare still wouldn't be able to run it.

    --
    If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  63. Uni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would go to a university and see if they have old equipment for just this kind of reason, the university I go to has video equipment that date decades back for the same sort of reason as you. The cool thing is they can transfer any format to any format, so if you want that beta on a blu-ray, you got it.

  64. Printer and OCR Software, or eBay by Amigori · · Score: 1
    If you want to do a hardware hack, then there's plenty of posts here already. This is probably way too much work and you'll probably need a few cases worth of dead trees, but you may be able to print out your old code, then just scan it with OCR software on your Mac. Granted it would be in OSX, not the emulator, but its a start. Of course, you'd still need the old computer plus a printer for it. I don't remember if the Amstrads had printers (I had a C64), so that might been an ever rarer find than the floppy drive.

    eBay has 2 listings for the needed floppy drives, here and here, but they aren't cheap.

    --
    "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
  65. Company that advertises this service by PReDiToR · · Score: 4, Informative

    I looked into this a while ago, I have a few CF2 3" disks, and would love to read what I wrote when I was 14.

    I found this company that offers conversions @ £5 a disk.

    This isn't the only company, but a google will find the others.

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    1. Re:Company that advertises this service by Ebirah · · Score: 1

      3" disks don't seem to survive well in my experience. (I tried to retrieve some stuff from my 8256/my fathers 9256) about the turn of the century, from disks that were only a few years old, with a drive that did work at the time, with very little success). If they were only in Amstrad format on 3.5"/5.25" disks, or if you had a 3" drive (somehow) plugged into a PC, there is a DOS program called 22disk which can read the files (and write them to somewhere usable).

      Regrettably these commercial services charge quite a bit to read the floppies and may well still charge you for a stack of unreadable media (it's probably an idea to ask them about this).

      --
      It's never so bad that it can't get worse.
  66. 8" IBM Displaywriter disk by StarEmperor · · Score: 1

    I have an 8" disk from the IBM Displaywriter system that my mom used in 1981. I'd love to see what's on it -- I'm pretty sure it contains some embarrassingly bad stuff I wrote for high school.

    Now you 5.25-inch kids get off my lawn.

  67. How big are the disks? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    What's the density on it? Could you just sprinkle some iron filings on the bare disk and take a picture?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  68. Pretty sure it is possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IRCC the drives can be connected to the same controller that can use a 5 1/4 drive.

    Dunnow if this helps:
    http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/retrocomputer/3INCHWEB.htm

    There are definately some utils to look at esp, around the older emulators.

    Another way is via a parrellel cable from a working CPC I think.

  69. Re:VMware by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Z80? That's the CPU my Timex-Sinclair 1000 used. I didn't know the Amstrads still used it in 1987! 1987 was the year I bought the (used, of course) IBM-XT and started hacking its hardware.

    I learned Z-80 assembly and hand-assembled machine code for the TS-1000 (around 1982), because I wanted a battle tanks game and the chip only ran at 1.5 mz (iirc) and it basically controled every system on the machine.

    My tanks game was awesome! Two people could play it at the same time, playing each other, both using the keyboard which had no actual keys. I'm still proud of that a quarter century later!

    Of course, the Z80 was a whole lot simpler than an x86. But then again I'm a whole lot simpler than later model people are.

    Ah, memory lane. Such sweet memories... oh shit I was still married then, WTF am I thinking? Good old days, my ass!

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  70. Not set forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someday I'll want that info and then I'll be all set. Assuming the disks are still readable (all media has a finite shelf life) and the floppy drive still works (ditto things with moving parts). I'd suggest transferring the data to a modern format as soon as possible.

    Oh yeah, and your floppy drive probably needs a controller. And controllers from that era generally plug into PCs with ISA slots. Do you have either?
  71. John Titor had this same problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A while back, a fellow by the name of John Titor had this exact same problem, only with a 70s vintage IBM machine.

    I'm sure if you search slashdot or the web at large for "John Titor" you'll find his solution.

  72. Anyone with an Amstrad want free floppies? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    So the problem is, how to read the strange 3 inch Amstrad floppy. And I have to think that another problem that other people who still have an Amstrad laying around in a collection somewhere have, is that they can no longer buy floppy media for it. And we now have the Internet, linking all of us geeky users together. Is there no one out there with an Amstrad that would be willing to accept floppy disks from other users, and read the data and transfer it to other media (most likely 1 CD for hundreds of floppies although other media options come to mind, including have the sender include a small flash drive), and in return the person with the Amstrad gets to keep the diskettes? Clearly the Amstrad would need to transfer data to a more modern system, but that should be a trivial problem to resolve.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  73. What i have seen so far by hurfy · · Score: 1

    I had much better luck recovering my 360k media than the other disks...90% or so. The higher up the density chain the lower the return rate :(

    Got data stored on old tapes? XP doesn't do floppy and parallel interface tape drives very happily (altho it is possible with enough random drivers loaded)

    Nor does XP want to do 360k drives :(

    Think the OP is bad, i have a basic game stored on a 10MB Wang removable platter i would like to move...... 300lb of equipment and 2000w to play battleship anyone? Playable online if i ship ya a terminal and 300 baud modem. At least i have the drive/computer just not the power to turn it all on :O

    Sounds interesting, good luck.

  74. FOUND! [incl. disks.] by Qwrk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Measuring something like 9.5 x 18.5 x 4.5 cm. Also dug up some original Amstrad PLC disks; 07077 CP/M Plus and a 07076 LocoScript 2. Let me know where your dungeon lives... or where your bed sleeps. Sure we will be able to work something out, as I've been selling off stuff for the benefit of the International Campaign for Tibet for quite a couple of years now. [On eBay, yes...]

  75. Pointers? by NotYoMama · · Score: 1

    "...So if anyone has any pointers it would be greatly appreciated."

    I got one...

    foo = &bar;

  76. Get one of the Amstrad PCW series by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    The Amstrad PCW series computers have one or two 3" drives, use CP/M as operating system, and the best part is - they are still in use by a lot of people for their word processing needs, so there is still a thriving community (believe it or not) of people ready to help you out, as well as a few businesses selling spares for the PCW. I have the PCW8256, and after replacing the rubber belt in the drive, it works perfectly - just like new. These babies can be equipped with a 3.5" floppy drive, and also they have a serial interface. Either of these goodies should allow you to transfer your softwares, eventually, onto a more modern media.

    Anyhow, I strongly recommend that you look into getting a PCW or getting in touch with someone who has one and will help you with this transfer.

    Problem solved.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  77. Assuming you haven't looked already by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

    http://search.ebay.com/Amstrad-floppy_W0QQ_trksidZm37QQfromZR40

    $280+ for the drives... or $40 for a "laptop"
    Wow! That's a BIG laptop. And ugly too.

    --
    Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  78. If it's similar to the C64 ... by Pigeon451 · · Score: 1
    The C64 floppy drive can connect directly to a PC using an easy to make cable: http://www.nkcelectronics.com/commodore-xa1541-ada1541.html

    Perhaps there is something similar for the Amstrad.

    Worst case scenario, find a person with an Amstrad, then list the program code and take pictures every page ...

  79. Re:VMware by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Thus why I was being snarky. No, they're not really compatible. Close, but no cigar. Still, you could probably take a copy of BOCHS or DOSBox and modify it for Z80 compatibility without too much difficulty. The architecture would still be all wrong for an Amstrad, though... :-)

  80. Nostalgia fades... by puppetman · · Score: 1

    after you've moved this stuff a few times from domicile to domicle.

    Add a wife and a couple of kids, a garage full of tools and supplies (because the houses you buy need rennovations), and make sure it's you lugging the heavy boxes; suddenly, those old bits and pieces lose their glitter, and they go on Craigslist for free.

    This sounds like the high school football players sitting in a bar, talking about their "glory days" rather than doing something interesting with their lives.

    You can never go home again.

    1. Re:Nostalgia fades... by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      Amen to that! And really, the data on those old floppies is much more valuable to you unseen and uninspected.

      Your best bet now is to pitch them in the trash. Even better, have your wife and kids do it while you are out golfing one day.

      We call this "letting go" and it is excellent therapy!

  81. Google is your friend by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Using Google, I fouund the solution. It appears that this guy can do the conversion for you and return your data in hours. Cost would not be prohibitive and would support the Amstrad addiction.

    He seems to have a pretty good handle on all the conversion problems, too. His page is a fun read just for that.

  82. Re:Belt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't find a belt, O rings sometimes work pretty good too. If you can't find the right size, some hardware stores can custom make them. Kept our old VCR running for a long time ;)

  83. Disks? I must be old. by Pugwash69 · · Score: 1

    When I learned programming on my BBC B, I wrote some programs out in a book until I got a printer! I still have some of them even now.

    --
    Pro Coffee Drinker
  84. Re:LAN party by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    Definitely sounds like a Vegas kinda party.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  85. Let me make a couple of xerox copies of that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you still have a headache you can take an asprin...

  86. "Hidden standards" in old 80's home computers. by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can plug PC 3 1/2 or 5 1/4 drive on an Amstrad, they use the same interface!

    Yup--Amstrad was one of the makers of oddball "semi-standard" PCs. It had standard serial ports that others like Atari and Commodore seemed averse to using on their 8-bit home computer lines (probably because they wanted to make it a hassle to use third-party peripherals--basically buy aour stuff, or buy an overpriced adapter to plug in standard stuff).

    Amstrad CPCs not only had the same floppy controller and interface as the IBM PC, it also used the same 6845 video display processor as well (which is why it had CGA-like graphics, and the added 16-colour low-res mode like the Tandy 1000 series and PCJr). Sound was identical to the MSX-based computers. They basically cherry-picked here and there.

    Too bad the use of a non-standard form factor drive with the standard connector had to happen though. What's this guy going to do with the old discs now? Fortunately for myself, I purchased a floppy drive for my Coleco ADAM the first opportunity I could because the modified cassette tapes were not all that reliable and they were hard to find. As a result all my old stuff ended up on floppies.

    The Coleco floppy drive had a non-standard ADAMNet interface (ADAMNet worked just like USB but slower--you could plug the keyboard into the back of the disk drive, or the front "keyboard" port, or swap the floppy and keyboard wires and the damn thing would work). More importantly though, the disks were normal 5.25" floppies FORMATTED TO A STANDARD 160KB FORMAT READABLE ON IBM PCs. Eighteen years after we got the ADAM I was able to scrounge up a leftover 5.25" floppy drive, put it in my Linux box and use DD to make images of the floppies that work perfect with emulators!

    Interestingly Atari kind of migrated towards less-proprietary architecture with its ST line too--ST computers had standard serial and parallel ports, and it used 3.5" floppies with a variant of FAT formatting that was readable on IBM PC drives.

    I was laughed at by Commodore and Apple fans for going with "toy" Coleco and Atari computers, but in a sense I got the last laugh, because I ended up with computers that had amongst the most easily recoverable media of all those computers of that era. So why did I choose the Coleco and Atari ST computers back then? Becasue both could be easily made to run a variant of CP/M, including popular apps like Wordstar.

    1. Re:"Hidden standards" in old 80's home computers. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I was laughed at by Commodore and Apple fans for going with "toy" Coleco and Atari computers, but in a sense I got the last laugh, because I ended up with computers that had amongst the most easily recoverable media of all those computers of that era. The Coleco one is a bit disingenuous though, because the floppy discs you used weren't the standard method of storage that came with it- that was the tape drives which were very non-standard and (you state) not very reliable!

      I've heard that although the system was derived from the standard audio cassette, the special tapes used weren't identical- perhaps they used a nonstandard tape formulation?- and the drives ran at a higher speed than ordinary audio cassettes. So I don't know if it would be possible to even transfer the signal by digitising it via a standard cassette player. If that wasn't possible, I suspect that the *only* way to get data off them would be to find a working Adam and transfer it via some sort of hookup cable to a modern computer.

      As for the ST... yeah, the IBM compatibility was a nice touch, but I'd rather have the extra storage space (880K vs. 720K) of my Amiga floppies. You could read and write PC discs on the Amiga if you wanted to (I did this with schoolwork and years later used it to transfer a limited number of Amiga files to my PC).
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:"Hidden standards" in old 80's home computers. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Amiga and Macs could use PC format floppies too, so that's not an issue. I was able to transfer my data this way.

    3. Re:"Hidden standards" in old 80's home computers. by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      Amiga and Macs could use PC format floppies too, so that's not an issue.

      The original Macs could NOT use IBM-formatted floppies. It wasn't until 1988 that Apple brought out the SuperDrive, and then only on higher-end Mac II machines. It took another year to be able to get it as an option on the SE and they weren't the most common option until the 1990s. In addition to needing the SuperDrive you also needed "PC Exchange" to make a disk that worked on an IBM.

      Amiga was in a similar boat, though the Amiga hardware was more standard. There, you needed a third-party, non-standard device handler and with that you lost the increased capacity and capabilities of the Amiga file system.

      Because Macs and Amigas had such a disincentive for using a standard, the vast majority of data ended up on proprietary-format media and have thus made moving data after-the-fact quite an ordeal, whereas in the case of my Atari ST and Coleco ADAM I was able to create images for emulation without extra hardware or software of any kind.

      I agree at the time that the native formats seemed appealing and were technically superior, but in the end standards based, open designs have proven to have the ultimate advantage.

    4. Re:"Hidden standards" in old 80's home computers. by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      The Coleco one is a bit disingenuous though, because the floppy discs you used weren't the standard method of storage that came with it

      Fair criticism to be sure, but compare this to ADAM's contemporaries: Commodore 64, Apple IIe, Atari 800XL, Tandy CoCo II, Sinclair Spectrum, Amstrad CPC...list goes on. NONE of these machines even had a standard floppy drive marketed as an option, much less as standard equipment so ADAM still wins out in that respect. At least the CPC had a standard drive INTERFACE so a third party device could be plugged in and software modified to support the drive, however, as the competition of the day goes, I'd still say Coleco took the best approach of all of them by offering an official plug'n'play option that used the same track-and-sector configuration originally used on the IBM PC.

      I've heard that although the system was derived from the standard audio cassette, the special tapes used weren't identical- perhaps they used a nonstandard tape formulation?

      The cassette was identical to a normal audio cassette with only one exception: there were two holes drilled into the face of the cassette housing in the upper corners (the whole is drilled into the areas where the voids are when you break off cassette write-protect tabs). This mod was there for two reasons: to prevent people from trying to see if standard cassettes would work, and to prevent them from being inserted on "side b" since the heads wrote across the entire width of the tape at once (making the tapes 256kbyte "single sided" media in a sense).

      As for the tape formulation, there was nothing special about them--they're equivalent to "hi-fi" chromium-formulated audio tapes. Word got out that TDK audio tapes had very nearly identical frequency response to Coleco's tapes and they became a favourite for those "orphaned users" who couldn't find Coleco's official tapes and made their own.

      and the drives ran at a higher speed than ordinary audio cassettes.

      Not only that, the data transfer rate for a Coleco TAPE was faster than for a Commodre 64 DISK ;-)

      So I don't know if it would be possible to even transfer the signal by digitising it via a standard cassette player.

      I don't know of any software similar to what I've seen for Speccy's and such, where you take a WAV of the tape and process it into the binary image, for the ADAM, but it should be feasible.

      The tape drives were a bit of a boneheaded idea, but unlike 3" floppies and waferdrives and such, they at least used media *physically* compatible with commonplace equipment. The biggest boner of all was that Coleco tape drives were INCAPABLE OF FORMATTING NEW MEDIA! This meant that you had to obtain pre-formatted tapes from somewhere (merely drilling the homes won't work--the tapes needed to be formated like a floppy).

      So, what do you do when Coleco stops making formatted tapes? You format them yourself...using your stereo's tape deck to dub from an original tape! You needed a high-end 2-tape deck and had to fiddle with equalisers to get a proper result, but once you figured out the right settings it worked just fine! It did of course help to have a high-speed dubber because thought the ADAM could read all the blocks on a tape in just over 4 minutes, they took 60 minutes to play in a normal tape deck.

      given that a dubbing audio deck could be used to format tapes, I cannot see how, with a bit of work, similar equipemnt couldn't be hooked to the line-in of your PC to digitise ADAM tapes too.

      As for the ST... yeah, the IBM compatibility was a nice touch, but I'd rather have the extra storage space (880K vs. 720K) of my Amiga floppies.

      Therein lies the trap: you get more capacity but at the cost of interoperability. For all the work of using extra device handlers/utilities/etc to get files on a PC floppy with less capacity you probably only did this when you NEEDED to..so now you're left with all your Amiga stuff on unreadable floppies and jus

    5. Re:"Hidden standards" in old 80's home computers. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      NONE of these machines even had a standard floppy drive marketed as an option

      I assume by "standard" you mean MS-DOS compatible. The Atari 8-bits' drives (for example) were all standard 5.25" models, though this is still of limited use unless the magnetic tracks/data its drives write can be read by non-Atari 5.25" drives.

      Actually, IIRC the XF551 (the final official Atari 8-bit drive) had an interface that could support other mechanisms, assuming that the DOS you were using also supported that.

      and to prevent them from being inserted on "side b" since the heads wrote across the entire width of the tape at once (making the tapes 256kbyte "single sided" media in a sense).

      Ah, I see. I guess they could also have done this by recording a periodic signal that when played backwards on the wrong track (i.e. tape upside down) would have invoked a user warning. But I guess the physical thing is easier, doesn't waste space, and lets them sell their "special" tapes!

      Not only that, the data transfer rate for a Coleco TAPE was faster than for a Commodre 64 DISK ;-)

      And I can walk faster than most 110-year-olds can sprint ;-) Yeah, I've heard that the C64 drives were *not* fast, due to a VIC-20 compatibility kludge in the design that didn't actually work anyway.

      I don't know of any software similar to what I've seen for Speccy's and such, where you take a WAV of the tape and process it into the binary image, for the ADAM, but it should be feasible.

      I was going to agree (since you say that they were effectively just chrome cassettes). They'd have to be transferred at standard audio speeds (not a problem unless you're impatient) if you were using an ordinary deck, and I assume that this would reduce their frequency to audible range. (If you were to play them back at the "usual" higher speeds, there may be problems with cables, digitising hardware and such only designed with 20-20000Hz audio signals in mind).

      As I said, I was going to agree, but one obvious problem is that the Adam uses the full width of the tape and most standard audio equipment *doesn't*- so even assuming that the Adam used a similar track layout to audio cassettes (four tracks), you could still only do two at a time, you'd have to reverse two, and then sync them.

      If the track layout was even more non-standard, you'd be totally out of luck, I guess!

      The tape drives were a bit of a boneheaded idea

      I think they were an okay idea for a time when floppies were still expensive. And as you suggest, at least they exploited some sort of standard. No worse than other disk alternatives like Sinclair's ZX Microdrive in that respect. And I'd rather (e.g.) Atari had been cleverer with *their* tape drives. Like Commodore's and everyone else's, these were effectively just ordinary cassette players adapted for data use (i.e. standard speed, had to push down play to load, had to manually REW/FFWD yourself). Thing is, the Atari tape deck was stereo anyway- it supported data on one track and audio on another, even while loading. But they didn't support two tracks of data to double the loading speed- that's an improvement that could still have been built around a standard audio cassette mechanism, and therefore wouldn't have increased costs much.

      BTW, you're absolutely right that the lack of formatting sounds appalling. The cynic in me thinks that this was a convenient way for Coleco to sell people more tapes...

      so now you're left with all your Amiga stuff on unreadable floppies and just a bit of old schoolwork that is reasonably easy to access without a working Amiga.

      Yeah, but I have a working Amiga, and I transferred all my own stuff. :) (Didn't bother with the games, I'm sure I can get the disk images on the net if I ever want them). Even if my Amiga was toast, I'm sure I could grab a secondhand Amiga or (more conveniently) find someone

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  87. Re:VMware by Ebirah · · Score: 1

    With a working Amstrad (with a working 3" drive) it's easy. All you need to do is (literally) hack it open and install a 3.5" floppy on its second drive (I think a standard PC floppy needs a bit of rewiring, but it's certainly possible). Then save the files to an Amstrad CP/M formatted 3.5" floppy and then read them on a PC using this software: http://8bit.yarek.pl/tool/pc.22disk/ Sadly working 3" drives are rather rare these days and tend to command 3-figure prices.

    --
    It's never so bad that it can't get worse.
  88. Old floppies were reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 5 years ago, I purchased an old Mac Plus somewhat on a whim, and somewhat to be able to get at my 1980s Mac disks. I had stuff that was about 20 years old at the time, going all the way back to 1984, including original copies of MacWrite 1.0, MacPaint 1.0, System 1.0, and Finder 1.0. (Unfortunately my Dad tossed the "Guided Tour" audio cassettes a while previously). Everything that I tried I was able to read just perfectly.

    Contrast this to my experience at the time (it's been a while since I've used any floppies for anything) which included brand new, just out of the box, preformatted floppies being complete useless.

    I think floppies were made to be reliable back when people used them for real data storage. And when people only used them for semi-disposable purposes, the quality control suffered.

    Mind you, they used to cost $4.00 apiece for single sided 400 KB floppies, so I think we have made some positive strides in data storage in the past 25 years.

    - Rich

  89. Tape might have been easier by Brit_in_the_USA · · Score: 1

    It occurred to me that it is interesting that restoring data/games/programs from tape (a popular format before 5 1/4 and 3 inch discs became affordable for home computer use) would be easier due to the huge number of consumer (music) tape playback units manufactured and still available and that modern PCs typically have a sound card - some software could decode the WAV file into binary.

    Since then music storage and computer storage have diverged. You can't normally use a standalone Music/Movie CD,DVD,HD-DVD, Bluray player to play discs congaing PC data/programs.

  90. I've done something like this by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    I transferred all my old apple ][ disks to my PC with all the useless crap I wrote in basic. I still have my ][c which helps. What I had to do was write a small program in apple monitor (assembly) to read the disk sectors one by one and echo the bytes in hex to the serial port. I wrote another program on my pc to listen on the serial port and read these hex codes back into bytes into a disk image file. I'd have to do a couple reads of each disk until I found an MD5 that was more prominent. It worked though!

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  91. Re:VMware by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    You could try it as an emulator stacking contest. You could run an Amstrad emulator inside a qemu session under a VM in VMWare. What is the current record on emulator stacking?

  92. Re:VMware by retzkek · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that the TI-85 (1992) and TI-86 (1997) graphing calculators both used it. There was actually a fairly large resurgence in Z80 assembly programming when a hack was discovered on the TI-85 whereby assembly language programs could be stored in general memory and accessed from the "Custom" menu. ZShell, anybody?

  93. Re:What???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never been to Houston (or pretty much any other Southern city these days) have you?

    Now a days, even the elementary schools in Houston teach the class in Spanish.

    Feel sorry for the one English only speaking kid in the back of class starting around that is now lost, and will be from now on.

    Very sad.

  94. Re:VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    i sense a new slashdot meme

  95. Re:VMware by snuf23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Best I ever did was:

    Linux on the base hardware
    Windows on VMWare
    Winuae Amiga emulator on Windows
    MAME arcade emulator on Amiga
    Dig Dug on MAME

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  96. Re: by clint999 · · Score: 0

    VMWare will totally help you run a system that originally ran on a Z80

  97. NOT true. My diskettes are completely readable. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just went and got a diskette hand-labeled "Windows for Workgroups 3.11, #1". Windows 95 replaced WFW, so the diskette is 14 years old. It is completely readable. Need evidence? Quote from SETUP.TXT:

    "AT&T(R) Safari Computer
    ------
    If you have an AT&T Safari computer, you cannot maintain two versions of Windows on your system. You must upgrade over your previous version of Windows, if you have one. If you set up Windows for Workgroups version 3.11 in its own directory, it will not use the special drivers required to run on the computer."


    You said, "The plastic carrier has become brittle..." That kind of plastic is a hazard to the environment, because it doesn't break down.

    "... the magnetic media has flaked off..." The substrate is Mylar. The glue is intensely adherent.

    ' "the bits on the media itself have "floated" ' Not so, I think I can install Windows for Workgroups again any time I like.

    I ran chkdsk a: /v /r /f. It found 512 bytes in a bad sector in one file, and said it fixed the problem. All other files were perfect.

    1. Re:NOT true. My diskettes are completely readable. by fd0man · · Score: 1

      I have only ever once actually see the magnetic layer flake off.

      A friend of mine, a long time ago, decided to run Norton Disk Doctor for DOS on a 3 1/2" floppy disk. However, he let it run for _several_ _days_. By the time I'd gone over to visit, it'd lost a decent chunk of it; the media's container was transparent in many spots.

  98. Re:VMware by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Z80? That's the CPU my Timex-Sinclair 1000 used. I didn't know the Amstrads still used it in 1987! 1987 was the year I bought the (used, of course) IBM-XT and started hacking its hardware. Well, the CPC series wasn't originally released then; it first came out in mid-1984. Even in the US, the 8-bit C64 was still being sold in 1987, I'm sure! (And even the NES which may have eclipsed the 8-bit home computers in some countries was itself 8-bit!)

    That having been said, the CPC was probably one of the final "all-new" 8-bit formats to be released. The market was already pretty well established, with the ZX Spectrum and C64 already entrenched, so the CPC did reasonably considering. The first "next generation" 16-bits, the Atari ST and Commodore Amiga (which were popular in Europe) came out in 1985, although they were too expensive to displace the 8-bit formats until the price came down a few years later. The 8-bit market eventually went into terminal decline around the turn of the decade, although games were still being sold in mainstream shops until around 1991/92.

    Anyway, Amstrad launched their first 16-bit PC clone around 1986 (arguably the first really affordable and successful PC clone in the UK), so although the CPC was still doing quite well, it wasn't Amstrad's "leading edge" at the time.

    They also sold Z80-based word processors well into the 1990s, but those were never meant to compete with mainstream computers; they were sold to people who would otherwise have bought a typewriter.

    OTOH, I don't know why they decided to launch an enhanced CPC in 1990- three years previously, it'd have been a good move, but it's not like anyone was going to be really interested in the machine, let alone support the new features when the 8-bit market was clearly on its last legs.
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  99. ddrescue and Foremost is a possible combo for you by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 3, Informative

    ddrescue is an open source disk recovery tool based on dd. It can make a disk image from any kind of disk, regardless of format and it is designed to be very robust reading through bad blocks as you're likely to have on disks that old. You just need to have a floppy drive to connect to. ddrescue will compile and run on Linux, OS X and maybe Cygwin.

    Once you have a disk image, Foremost can extract files from it. It is also open source and can be compiled and run on many different platforms and doesn't care about the filesystem on the disk image (or original disk). It searches for files based on header information. If need be, you can edit what header information it looks for. Since your BASIC source code is, presumably, ASCII text files, it shouldn't be a problem.

  100. Elephant Never Forgets (+5 Nostalgia) by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1
    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
    1. Re:Elephant Never Forgets (+5 Nostalgia) by TheMeld · · Score: 1

      Jeez, I remember those. The home PC when I was a wee one used a bunch of their stuff for a Northstar Z80 based system that ran CP/M. Had Wordstar, a copy of Logo by the Lisp Corporation, I think my parents used an ancient version of DBase, and an early version of Microsoft Money. Somewhere in my place or theirs, I think there's even a poster with the elephant :)

      +5 Nostalgia indeed!

      --
      -Cheetah
  101. Re: by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No, but QEMU might, i hear there is a Z80 emulator for it somewhere.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  102. A CPC drive will be enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do not need a complete CPC to recover those disk... A working 3" CPC drive would be enough, any not-so-old PC controller can use it with the proper cable (a tweaked 5 1/4 PC drive ribbon cable) and software.

    For example, look for CPCDiskXP here:

    http://www.cpcmania.com

  103. Done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy an Amstrad with a working floppy drive. Read the disks and "squirt" the data via RS-232.

  104. You just need a zen attitude about it by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    If that undergrad was a hard worker and successfully recovered the data, I bet he got a phat assignment the next summer.

  105. No one to post from CPC? by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 1

    I really expected to read at least one post starting "Typing at the moment this post on CPC...". There were no real geeks in CPC community, I guess. I mean, is it that hard to implement TCP stack and to port Firefox?

    --
    No sig today.
    1. Re:No one to post from CPC? by Richard+Fairhurst · · Score: 1

      Here is a TCP/IP stack for the CPC. I did very briefly start work on a web browser for it - no, really - but never got very far...

    2. Re:No one to post from CPC? by DrHyde · · Score: 1

      Ahh, good times. I used to run the DNS for barnyard.co.uk on that :-)

      Why? Because I could, and it was preferable to running BIND. Come to think of it, it still is preferable to running BIND. I think I shall port it to my Z80 emulator!

  106. Best forum I know for this question... by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1
  107. The disks may still be useable by warewolfsmith · · Score: 1

    1. If you can afford it consider using a professional data recovery firm, that's what they do for a living.

    2. The bit sizes on the old disks were huge (millions of ferrite particles) because of the primitive read write heads, there's a pretty good chance that there is enough of the bits left to recover.

    Good Luck.

  108. Am I too big a nerd.... by Synonymous+Bosch · · Score: 1

    ... For being excited by the prospect of learning everything you need to learn to actually BUILD one of these drives?

    Think about it, at some point someone somewhere had to make one of these from scratch before they went into mass production. As a one man job with 1980 technology it was achieveable and affordable.

    How hard could it be in the modern day?

    Every time I read an old history on Microsoft or Apples early days, I start itching to reproduce what they did when they first implemented these technologies.

    It'd be like building your very own Wright Bros flyer :)

    1. Re:Am I too big a nerd.... by rhartness · · Score: 1

      I would be the nerd to agree with you but there is one problem-- testing. Assuming you had the time/budget/brains to do this, the project would break down at the testing phase. Testing the drive could inadvertantly ruin the disks for various reasons. If you only have a handful of disks that you'd like to save, it's not worth the effort if there is a chance that the data will be lost for good.

    2. Re:Am I too big a nerd.... by Synonymous+Bosch · · Score: 1

      TESTING? What kind of nerd ARE you? It's all about blind production implementation, baby! Testing is for service packs! ;)

  109. Re:VMware by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

    There seem to be several Amstrad emulators already. And if for some reason you don't like any of them, you could reuse an existing open source Z80 emulation core. Ours, for example. :)

  110. Off topic but really cool by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

    SymbOS is a new graphical OS that provides binary compatibility across two Z80-based platforms: CPC and MSX. It can do multitasking and even play videos, on an 8-bit CPU.

  111. You want to hear something really crazy? by JesseL · · Score: 1

    Earlier this week I finished building a brand new batch of reflow furnace controllers that use dual Z80s. The design dates from the 80's and was been superseded by a controller that uses an AMD SC520, but some customers of the furnace manufacturer we sell the controllers to, want to keep using the same equipment they've had for 20 years with no changes, so my company still builds brand new electronics with 4MHz Zilog Z80 processors every few years.

    Every time we think the product is finally dead, we get an order for more.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  112. RE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done this with my entire 100+ floppy collection of Atari 800 software. Bought a DIY cable off eBay (there's also instructions online on how to make your own) that connects Atari's weirdo proprietary SIO interface to a regular PC RS232 serial port with all the proper voltage conversions. Then just hook up my still-working monster truck of an Atari 810 disk drive straight to the PC...run a disk dump program I downloaded online in an XP command prompt...and save the images. Then fire up the excellent Atari800Win emulator (other equally excellent ones are available for Linux and Mac) and voila! For the most part all data--including my old 1982 tax returns and all kinds of AtariWriter docs and BASIC programs I wrote--was completely preserved. Some bad sectors on a few disks which the dump utility notified me of, but since read/writes were so simple and raw on that hardware you can have a bum sector periodically without hosing anything important except maybe causing a program to crash on some corrupted BASIC syntax. Found ROM's for all my old cartridges online, and now I have a burned CD that has my entire life and entire computing universe from 1982-88. Remarkable.

    Unless the Amstrad drives have some funky-ass interface that just cannot be hooked up to a PC (and that's unlikely given how dirt simple 8-bit disk I/O interfaces used to be), there probably are similar patch cables and dump utilities available for transferring data from that platform. Vintage computing emulation is so hot right now as is format preservation that there are probably many people covering that platform. The only dilemma would be getting a working vintage disk drive since it's highly unlikely a stock PC 5 1/4" floppy drive could handle such alien formats without destroying the disk (even on a read). Fortunately an eBay search will probably show a lot of working vintage equipment if you don't have one. Refurbished Atari parts are in ample circulation...if my 810 drive wasn't so immortal I probably would've been able to get a replacement without too much trouble.

  113. Deserve backups? by peterpi · · Score: 1

    You had an Amstrad then, and a Mac now?

    Perhaps it's all for the best :p

  114. Re:VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic is , well this, me bitch'n about some asshole who can't mod worth a damn. No, that's flamebait...
  115. what kind of google is this?? by w1d3 · · Score: 1

    Google: http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=...

    f*cking microsoft agents

  116. Re:VMware by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    And.. I'm okay with that....

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  117. The Best Way to Read 3" Disks on a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can get hold of an External 3" Drive (DDI-1), and have Access to a Windows-PC, you could try this useful Program:
    http://www.cpcmania.com/cpcdiskxp/cpcdiskxp.htm

    You can Connect the Drive Directly to the PC, with the Standard PC-Floppy-Cable!
    It has the Same Connector! Works Great so far.

    Good Luck

  118. How about Quality PC/multi-format Floppy Drives? by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

    I've been wanting to archive several shoeboxes of floppies - mainly FAT/FAT32, but several Apple II and other Unix - but I haven't had a great success rate with those I've tried and at least some of the time I suspect it is because of poor quality modern floppy drives. Yes, they generally work but I doubt anyone can make a robut floppy drive that retails for $20 or less (which I all do).

    A long time ago I had seen someone talking about a 3.5" + 5.25" combo drive (USB?) which could read multiple formats including DOS and Amiga disks, but was never able to locate it. Poor Google-fu.

    Ideas on that or someone who rents out a high quality drive would be appreciated since at $5 a disk it would cost me a new computer to read my data...

    Thanks!

  119. How I got the 1541... by mefdahl · · Score: 1

    I was burning through tapes; all that rewinding to reset the counter, so I could find my programs. I was also failing 4th grade spelling. So the first program I ever wrote was a spelling program. You started it up, entered the spelling list and it would go through the list three times flashing the word up and then waiting for you to enter it. Repeating the word if you got it wrong. I aced a whole semester of spelling got the floppy drive and was the happest geek kid ever!

  120. Do it the other way by Richard+Fairhurst · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow - a CPC question on /. The best years of my life were spent hacking on a CPC - I worked as freelance technical editor for Amstrad Action magazine (on which the mighty Future Publishing was founded), coded a DTP system, a load of demos, a route-planner (you know, "I want to get from London to Edinburgh, what's the quickest way?"), and so on.

    I used to get a handful of letters to AA's technical Qs+As column ("Techy Forum") every month asking "how do I transfer my files to a PC?". Lots of posters have mentioned the easiest ways to do it, which would probably be the ways I'd have recommended at the time: data transfer bureaux, hooking up a drive to a PC and copying across, etc. etc.

    Here's a more involved solution, which is the best long-term one for the serious CPC hacker, and is how I do it. I'm not seriously recommending you do this.

    Get a CPC with second drive interface (i.e. anything except an unexpanded 464), and connect a 3.5in drive - any standard Shugart 3.5in drive - to it. Theoretically you need a separate power supply for the 3.5in drive, but you can actually hotwire this to the monitor power supply.

    Then use WriteDSK on the CPC to transfer CPC discs into .DSK images on a DOS-formatted 720k disc. (The CPC's FDC can't cope with 1.44Mb discs.) Getting WriteDSK onto your CPC in the first place is left as an exercise for the reader. :)

    Put that in a USB floppy drive, copy across to your Mac and run in WinAPE under Parallels - far and away the best CPC emulator there is.

    For general CPC information, have a look at CPCwiki. It's a goldmine in itself, but best of all is the scan archive of Amstrad Action, Amstrad Computer User etc. etc.

  121. Re:ddrescue and Foremost is a possible combo for y by Richard+Fairhurst · · Score: 1

    CPC BASIC source isn't ASCII unless you explicitly save it as such (SAVE "FILENAME.BAS",A). Usually it's tokenised.

    Tsk, these kids with 2Gb memory... when I were a lad with a 64k Amstrad, every byte counted (contd. page 94)

  122. From 3" to 3"1/2 by Vapula · · Score: 1

    Well, to recover the data from your amstrad disks, you'll either need to put a 3" disk drive on a PC or to have an Amstrad 664/6128 or a Spectrum+3

    I'd recommend the latter solution as you'd probably have to rip an Amstrad/Spectrum to get that disk drive anyway...

    Check that the drive is working OK. When I bought my Spectrum +3 on E-Bay, all was fine except for the disk drive...

    The drive belt had to be replaced. You may find some brand new belt at "thesinclairshop" (also on E-Bay + has it's web site) or find some compatible belt. From various forums, it appears to be a very common problem.

    To replace the belt, you won't need special tools, standard screwdrivers are all what you'll need... And lots of patience. Just be careful to not lose the Write-protect switch pin...

    Then, you'll need to connect a 3"1/2 drive to the amstrad/spectrum. Here, you'll have a second problem. One of the pins used to have a READY signal and now have a DISC PRESENT signal (or the opposite ?). Some floppy drives will be unusable, other will need to change a jumper... The fun part is that now, these jumpers are SMD jumpers SOLDERED to the floppy control board...

    You'll have to make your own floppy cable too ad you'll need to force the level of the "density select" pin (Amstrad only knows Double Density and not High Density), the side select pin (some use a switch to be able to use both sides of the floppy) and to be sure that you've the right wiring order.

    From now, you'll be able to format the 3"1/2 disks in Amstrad format, copy the 3" disk to the 3"1/2 and use some tools to extract the .DSK file from the 3"1/2 disk on your PC.

    You may also use tools that allows to write to FAT floppies on the amstrad... your choice... Lots of other messages here already told about these tools so I won't repeat them.

  123. Re:VMware by benjymous · · Score: 1

    You can run a mac emulator on the amiga, and Mame on the Mac, for an extra step

    --
    Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
  124. Re:ddrescue and Foremost is a possible combo for y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent down. This is an issue about getting disks into a correct drive and other issues which would come up long before it could be a nice unix-style block device. DD wouldn't help here.

  125. Serial is the way to go by Mephistro · · Score: 1

    I'm no expert in Amstrad machines, but if you can find one of them in working order, I guess you could just use a serial cable and two small communications programs, written in Basic. I did that 20 years ago, in order to recover the data from an ancient 'typesetting' machine to a PC. Good luck

  126. Locomotive by Jumpin'+Jon · · Score: 1

    Try hunting out Locomotive Software in the UK, who helped me retrieve some data from Amstrad floppies some years back. I think they produced a lot of the original software for Amstrad. JJ

    1. Re:Locomotive by fistynuts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try hunting out Locomotive Software in the UK, who helped me retrieve some data from Amstrad floppies some years back. I think they produced a lot of the original software for Amstrad. Er, not least the built-in BASIC interpreter!
      --
      "You heard the man, Tubbs.. get undressed."
  127. Re:ddrescue and Foremost is a possible combo for y by fistynuts · · Score: 1

    Bloody hell, it's Richard Fairhurst! Where did I put those back-issues of Amstrad Action...

    --
    "You heard the man, Tubbs.. get undressed."
  128. My friend's dad has an Amstrad (so there!) by ClarisseMcClellan · · Score: 1

    Nostalgia is what it used to be!

    The original Amstrad wordprocessor came out at an interesting time in the UK. Unemployment rates were sky high and one of my friend's dads (he had two) quit the day-job to build a new writing career. The Amstrad was bought with a grant, then available to people wanting to set up their own business (therefore reducing the unemployment figures). I think there was five pounds a week more than 'dole' in doing this and you did not have to 'sign on' every fortnight.
    Anyway, on a chance visit to friend's dad five years ago I noticed this particular Amstrad was still in use, in it's original application. There was green rationale in not throwing the thing out (and getting a PC), furthermore, for word-processing, what more do you need? The Z80 was able to keep up with the typing and even the largest poetry anthologies could fit on those disks.
    Given the decades of use I doubt that this particular Amstrad has yet to be chucked out. I would be surprised if it has been moved out of the study, it probably isn't collecting dust either as the dust covers (remember them?) always went on when the machine was turned off.

    Message me if you live in the UK and want to track down a 'current user'.

  129. Re: Mod parent up by Cochonou · · Score: 1

    From my experience, hooking a 3"1/2 drive to the CPC itself is the best way to proceed.

  130. Media Durability by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    Having been asked to recover data from old 5.25 disks, I must point out that some of the problem is the actual durability of the magnetic information, because it is likely to NOT be permanent. I've seen data develop some very odd typos over the course of just a few years, and disks go blank and read non-formatted after a decade.

    The precious information might not be there at all.

    If you didn't migrate it to a more recent format, you might be Sadly Out of Luck

    This only highlights the problem durability of information in a digital age, especially if the power goes down due to another technological dark age. (insert scenario here)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  131. Reading old floppy disks. by lowlevel · · Score: 1

    Even if you had 3.5" floppies, there were hundreds of formats, your best chances with anything are with finding the original machine capable of reading the disks.

    A few years ago, I had about 500 3.5" floppy disks, that were not only from an HP 9845 computer from 1976, were created using a 3rd party 'storage rom' on a disk/harddrive combo unit not originally designed for the HP 9845. (Looked like it came from the HP Apollo series unix machines.)

    I went so far as to track down the original author of the storage rom. He couldn't tell me much except that there were hundreds of different 3.5" formats from the era. He wished me luck, and mailed me an original manual for his rom that he had kicking around. ;)

    In then end, I got an old HP 9845 machine, made it use the printer for the console, since the display was fried... bought this product called HT Basic for windows with an IEEE-488 card, and I wrote basic programs on either end, to send the data over to the PC.

    Good luck buddy, you're going to need it.

    --
    -lo
  132. Commodore PET by Onyma · · Score: 1

    I still have my 2 Commodore PET's and associated cassette and disk drives along with all my code from back then. Every couple years I fire one up and load a program or two for fun. Last time was about a year ago and all worked like a charm.

    --
    Play me online? Well you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll "/sbin/shutdown -h now" you. -Weird Al, kinda.
  133. Viewing magnetic stripes by wsanders · · Score: 1

    There used to be a technology that used a staining solution of some kind and could view the data on 1/2 tapes as differently shaded bands. I recall hearing stories about this, and at 800 or even 1600 bpi I am sure it was feasible to recover data that way if the motivation arose.

    Not sure why you would want to, if the tape drive actually existed, perhaps in the case of a tape that was burned or crumpled.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  134. Maybe a programmable drive... by Anne.O.Neimaus · · Score: 1

    The floppy drives for the Commodore 64 & 128 were basically outdated technology even in their heyday. However, each drive contained a 6910 (or 6902?) processor, just like the computer itself. Furthermore, almost everything involved in reading and writing was programmable: Track stepping, sectors-per-track, bytes-per-sector, and even the GCR (Group Code Recording) lookup table. All of the details were extensively well-documented (mostly by enthusiasts, rather than Commodor). I think the communications between drive and computer was serial (although using some sort of DIN connector), so it ought to be possible to cobble together an interface.

    I never got hold of the last, most-evolved batch of drives for the c128, but I vaguely recall that they were actually capable of supporting double-sided floppies. There were both 5.25" and 3.5" drives. I'm wondering if it wouldn't be worth hunting down a set of drives (and possibly a c128) in order to read and recover various obsolete media (for example, I have old CP/M & ISIS-II 5.25" floppies, old 8-Sector IBM single-sided 5.25" floppies, DEC Rainbow 5.25" floppies, Commodore-64 single-sided/single-density 5.25" floppies, and Atari 520-ST 720K 3.5" floppies), as well as stacks of PC-style double-sided/high-density 5.25" floppies (and no computer with a 5.25" drive).

    Making a hybrid PC/Commodore "Media-Conversion" box out of one of my old PC "husks" might actually be an interesting and worthwhile project...

  135. Get someone else to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google to see if someone is doing some kind of amstrad archive project where they'r trying to collect all software etc for amstrad etc. these people are likely to have the hardware necessary for reading your disks, and may be willing to help you, especially if you have some rare amstrad stuff

  136. talk about an 80's flashback by peavy · · Score: 0

    and fire up my old fido node for old time sake :)