Slashdot Mirror


Bye Bye Bananas — the Return of Panama Disease

Ant sends in a disturbing report in The Scientist on an imminent threat to worldwide banana production. "The banana we eat today is not the one your grandparents ate. That one — known as the Gros Michel — was, by all accounts, bigger, tastier, and hardier than the variety we know and love, which is called the Cavendish. The unavailability of the Gros Michel is easily explained: it is virtually extinct. Introduced to our hemisphere in the late 19th century, the Gros Michel was almost immediately hit by a blight that wiped it out by 1960. The Cavendish was adopted at the last minute by the big banana companies — Chiquita and Dole — because it was resistant to that blight, a fungus known as Panama disease... [Now] Panama disease — or Fusarium wilt of banana — is back, and the Cavendish does not appear to be safe from this new strain, which appeared two decades ago in Malaysia, spread slowly at first, but is now moving at a geometrically quicker pace. There is no cure, and nearly every banana scientist says that though Panama disease has yet to hit the banana crops of Latin America, which feed our hemisphere, the question is not if this will happen, but when. Even worse, the malady has the potential to spread to dozens of other banana varieties, including African bananas, the primary source of nutrition for millions..."

519 comments

  1. Look on the bright side of... by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will this finally be the end of "Peanut Butter Jelly Time"?

    1. Re:Look on the bright side of... by c6gunner · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where the hell did you find Banana Jelly???

    2. Re:Look on the bright side of... by weetabeex · · Score: 0

      Nop... that one will become a classic by the time the bananas get extinct. Then everyone will be teaching their sons and grandsons about "Peanut Butter Jelly Time".

    3. Re:Look on the bright side of... by pubjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can someone please explain this to those of us that are not from the USA.

    4. Re:Look on the bright side of... by edbob · · Score: 3, Informative
    5. Re:Look on the bright side of... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      First hit on google

      Meme that went around the internet 4-5 years ago.

    6. Re:Look on the bright side of... by sBox · · Score: 1

      Elvis, wherever he is, is in a panic.

    7. Re:Look on the bright side of... by Tsoat · · Score: 1

      but i love peanut butter jelly time :'(

    8. Re:Look on the bright side of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is nothing to explain. if you find it funny, then that's all there is to it. if you don't, oh well.

    9. Re:Look on the bright side of... by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      I thought this was something from Family Guy....which was first, this youtube thing, or the one on Family Guy?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Look on the bright side of... by Mr.+Beatdown · · Score: 1

      The flash was first.

      --
      My fellow Americans, let's restore the death penalty for child rapists. Let's do it . . . for the children.
    11. Re:Look on the bright side of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This video was first, the family guy was a parody of it after it had become a somewhat popular viral video.

    12. Re:Look on the bright side of... by SpinningCone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Family guy was spoofing the Internet meme, and was actually quite late to the party. PB&J time was on the decline by then.

    13. Re:Look on the bright side of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's like Monty Python then (ducks for cover).

    14. Re:Look on the bright side of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the bright side. The bright side, right in the summary, is

      "...There is no cure, and nearly every banana scientist says..."

      And no, I don't need a punchline.

    15. Re:Look on the bright side of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never.

    16. Re:Look on the bright side of... by cgdiaz · · Score: 1

      Will this finally be the end of "Peanut Butter Jelly Time"? There is no word yet from the banana scientists. God...I want to go to school and graduate to be known as a banana scientists, anyone else?
  2. out of season by ionix5891 · · Score: 2

    Great we can then but locally produced bananas! oh wait nvm

    Gordon Ramsay has must be loving this latest development
    http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/open_thread/2008/05/seasonal_disorder.html

    1. Re:out of season by ionix5891 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      doh! in rush to make first post spellcheck turned off again!

      BUY not but :)

  3. monoculture is a problem by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but it is also solved by genetic variation. the story is a little hysterical, as african varieties are also genetically different enough to resist the new cavendish-hungry fungus. not that the african varieties can't be attacked, but the emphasis is on african VARIETIES: more genetic variation means more resistance to the weakness of monoculture

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:monoculture is a problem by onion2k · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem is that all banana plants around today are sterile. The only way to cultivate new plants is by cuttings (taking a small section of an existing plant and growing it into a big plant). Consequently there is no way to introduce new variations. If all the varieties around today become susceptible to disease then that's it, they're gone. For those of us in the west that's just one less choice in the supermarket, but there are vast swathes of the world where the banana is the staple carbohydrate source for millions of people. It'd be like the west no longer having anything to make flour for bread, and having no alternative. Anyone who thinks this isn't a huge problem is wrong.

    2. Re:monoculture is a problem by tehdaemon · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are not all quite sterile... you do get a seed for every few hundred pounds of bananas.

      That said, you are essentially right. All cavendish bananas are clones, this makes them very vulnerable to disease.

      T

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    3. Re:monoculture is a problem by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, New Scientist did a story about this, maybe five years ago, which was worried about the bananas' genetic variation, but didn't have any specific threat attached. They pointed out that although the current banana plants is pretty hardy, they're cultivated by cloning, so there's very little capacity for adaptation there. I forget the details of the story, but it was something like "there may not be any bananas as we know them in 25 years". Now the threat actually exists...

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:monoculture is a problem by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And what do you think will happen when all rich countries will buy bananas from africa? This happens with all kinds of food already, this aint good news for the poor people of africa.

    5. Re:monoculture is a problem by Cairnarvon · · Score: 1

      How many of those are edible, and how many are tasty? The wild banana has genetic variation aplenty, but it's also disgusting.

    6. Re:monoculture is a problem by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That said, you are essentially right. All cavendish bananas are clones, this makes them very vulnerable to disease.

      and they taste like wet paper bags. I haven't eaten a Chiquita in over 10 years, I prefer any other which at least taste like a banana. Chiquitas were only bred for looks.

    7. Re:monoculture is a problem by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And what do you think will happen when all rich countries will buy bananas from africa?


      For the most part, they (we?) won't. Most varieties of Banana's are rather small and nasty. They're not the kind of thing your average westerner is likely to enjoy.

      On the other hand, assuming they can find a variety of Banana which is easy to cultivate, resistant to this disease, AND tasty, then it'll be a huge boon to their economy. It could do more good for Africa than all the foreign aid of the last three decades combined.
    8. Re:monoculture is a problem by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most varieties of Banana's are rather small and nasty

      Yay!

      The Grocers' apostrophe strikes!

      Sorry - your post was otherwise insightful, but those bloody Grocer's piss me right off :P

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    9. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, monoculture is a HUGE problem.

      At the moment I'm working in the bio/ag-tech industry and can see the same thing coming down the road in the wheat/corn/soybeans/milo industry, where big industry players have foolishly limited the gene pool in the name of profit.

      The worst part about it is the fact that many of the people driving monoculture are trained scientists who, for some reason, are oblivious to its negative ramifications.

      Posting as AC to avoid other, uh, negative ramifications

    10. Re:monoculture is a problem by vidarh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Go to your local African food store and ask for Plaintain. Eat it (note that Plaintains are usually cooked first). Now you see why this is not going to be a problem.

      Being married to an African woman (Nigerian to be precise), I've had the misfortune of tasting Plaintain, and while I don't mind most of her food (it's usually either too bland and uniformely textured or too spicy for me, but generally edible), with Plaintain I see no redeemable qualities.

      It's a very acquired taste, as a lot of African staple food, and it's certainly no replacement for the types of Banana exported to the west.

    11. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 5, Interesting
      And here is why I *never* *ever* buy Chiquita (new name for United Fruit Company) products: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

      I find it funny how the wikipedia article on Chiquita just mentions the name change but none of the history it was meant to hide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiquita_Brands_International

      At least now you slashdotters know how the expression banana republic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic came to be. A republic that a criminal banana company would be capable of destroying.

    12. Re:monoculture is a problem by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, assuming they can find a variety of Banana which is easy to cultivate, resistant to this disease, AND tasty, then it'll be a huge boon to their economy. It could do more good for Africa than all the foreign aid of the last three decades combined. Or, of course, the 3 or 4 big banana companies of the earth (which are all 'western'), will jump into the void and start exploiting African banana farmers, let them work in dangerous conditions, using chemicals, and not nearly paying them enough to make a proper living. So more or less re-create the current status quo in latin-american banana farming but now in africa...
    13. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The wild banana has genetic variation aplenty, but it's also disgusting."

      that's genetic variation to prevent the fruit from being eaten by two-legged straight-walking simians who do not spread the seeds/pollen. :-)

    14. Re:monoculture is a problem by aproposofwhat · · Score: 4, Funny

      that's "seem's", you insensitive clod!

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    15. Re:monoculture is a problem by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      oh yes! like the banana plantations have helped the milpa farmers in Central and South America by making them cheap labor for international conglomerates...

      --
      Get a web developer
    16. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Er, it's a staple but I'd be surprised if it's THE staple. In Africa, which this story mentioned, the east and south live off maize flour and in the west there's a lot of rice, and a big root I think is Cassava. Sure you get plantain and banana, but certainly not with every meal.

    17. Re:monoculture is a problem by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It'd be like the west no longer having anything to make flour for bread, and having no alternative.
      I'm sure Monsanto would have an alternative, with easy payment terms to boot.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:monoculture is a problem by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2

      MMmmmm... tostones (green plaintains, fried, then smashed, then fried again), maduros (pan fried ripe plaintains), mofongo (greenish plantains smashed up with chunks of bacon and chicken broth)... mmm... plantains.

      Of course, this is from my Puerto Rican wife - are the African plantains the same ones with the same possibilities?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    19. Re:monoculture is a problem by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      The problem is that all banana plants around today are sterile. The only way to cultivate new plants is by cuttings (taking a small section of an existing plant and growing it into a big plant). Consequently there is no way to introduce new variations. If all the varieties around today become susceptible to disease then that's it, they're gone.

      It's like I am Legend, if the movie was made with bananas, instead of people!

    20. Re:monoculture is a problem by Arccot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And here is why I *never* *ever* buy Chiquita (new name for United Fruit Company) products: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company I can't understand this sort of thinking. Sure, if the company did this within the last 10 or maybe even 20 years, I would understand a boycott. But it happened almost 80 years ago. It's not the same company now. I would be surprised if more than a couple of people working for the company at the time were even still alive.

      It's like boycotting Japanese products because of Pearl Harbor.
    21. Re:monoculture is a problem by Dextrously · · Score: 3, Funny

      Has anyone tried eating the fungus yet? Perhaps it and the bananas do not taste very different.

    22. Re:monoculture is a problem by vorpal22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then you've only had plantains one of the two ways in which they're eaten. I agree that green plantains aren't my cup of tea. In my opinion they're like overly firm and starchy potatoes with a hint of banana flavouring to them. After a week of traveling Panama, I never wanted to see them again.

      However, if you let plantains ripen until they're black (at which point, they're still perfectly edible, unlike bananas) and then peel them, cut them into long slices, and cook them in butter, they're incredibly sweet and delicate.

      More in line with the original post, there are several varieties of bananas that I find much more delicious than the Cavendish variety. I've had the pleasure of eating several other varieties while abroad that I really enjoyed; for example, apple bananas have got a firmer, more flavourful meat to them, and I strongly prefer them to Cavendish. Cavendish bananas, although I love them, can be a bit dull tasting and mushy.

    23. Re:monoculture is a problem by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      Errrr... curse not previewing. That should read "one of the two ways in which I've eaten them". Of course, people have been inventive enough to find more than just two things to do with plantains *ooops*.

    24. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have to find an African food store. It's readily available at the local supermarket. Or, in good years, from plants in my own back yard.

      A plantain is not a sweet bananna. Few people will eat it straight-up as a snack. But I've heard of it being prepared like mashed potatoes (bake, mash and apply lots of black pepper), or let it ripen until soft and black to improve sugar content.

      Tostones are a Caribbean favorite. Fried sliced plantains good with mojito sauce. Or, if you prefer, you can buy bags of plantain chips. They're a lot like potato chips. Little inherent flavor, but lots of salt, grease and crunch.

      Like a lot of staple foods, plantains aren't high in flavor. But they're just bland, not nasty. Bland is something you fix with creative use of add-on flavorings.

    25. Re:monoculture is a problem by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I know it's hip to bash the big evil corporation. But, in all fairness, is there any practical way to do business in many of these countries and NOT be corrupt? I mean, these are countries where government officials and local heavies EXPECT bribes and payoffs.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    26. Re:monoculture is a problem by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm married to a Caribbean woman, and she gets plantains all the time. In fact, you can get them at the regular grocery store in New York City - probably because they are popular in Latin America.

      Anyway, I find them quite tasty! The green ones are starchy and mostly flavorless... kind of like a potato. The ripe ones are quite delicious, though I think that people get turned off by the brown/black ripe skin color that would mean "over-ripe" in banana-land.

      But then again, I'm weird - I really don't much like bananas. For me, though, plantains were not an acquired taste... I liked ripe fried plantains the first time I tried them.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    27. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being married to an African woman (Nigerian to be precise), I've had the misfortune of tasting Plaintain
      Wow, all that Nigerian spam was not a lie if even their women have a mass1ve pen3s!
    28. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the bananas become flesh eating bananas? Oh, wait

    29. Re:monoculture is a problem by bloodninja · · Score: 1

      more genetic variation means more resistance to the weakness of monoculture So, you don't think that all the linux distros should adopt a single package manager and synchronize release schedules?
      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    30. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have a valid point.

      It is hard to compare such distinct events. But I would say that the damage caused by Pearl Harbor was "contained", and later "repaired". The US did not suffer that much from that war, and Japan was given conditions to rebuild.

      Pearl Harbor did not destroy the US democracy.

      The damage caused by the United Fruit Company, to that region (Central America) stability, to those countries democracies is still an issue to this day.

      The land that many of those countries tried to nationalize, and died for trying it, is still in the hands of the "United Fruit Company". Now renamed "Chiquita".

      The grandchildren of those who died in the 50s, 60s for it, are still workers in that same land, and did not become land-owners.

      Those sitting at Chiquita today did not cause the offense. But they still make profits out of it, and the mess caused by that offense perpetuates to this day.

    31. Re:monoculture is a problem by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea if you are boycotting Chiquita you dang well better be boycott Bayer, BASF, Mitsubishi, and Volkswagen to name just a few.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    32. Re:monoculture is a problem by metlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slice off the skin of a plantain, cut it into slices and leave the slices in some curried, salt water for a few hours.

      Take it out, add some ginger and spices and oil and fry the plantains with some cilantro and coriander.

      Voila! You've one of the best south Indian delicacies - plantain curry - which is usually eaten with rice and some sauce/yogurt on the side.

    33. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, cavendish bananas may be clones, but not ALL bananas are.
      Basically, here in Brazil, one of the things I miss most are the US bananas.
      Bananas here are quite different than the ones we have in the US, that usually come from Guatemala. And they have hundreds of different varieties of bananas. A local friend got a small ranch in the mountains and he grows different kinds of fruits there, including bananas, and he had problems with those bananas spreading too fast (the new banana trees spread under the soil through the roots of the older ones).
      So, IANAB (I Am Not A Botanist) but I think that not all bananas are threatened, only Central America (and, consequently, our, US bananas) are.
      So, perhaps this is the prelude of a "banana war"?
      Read this article from UN-FAO about the disease and the bananas:
      http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=18328&Cr=banana&Cr1

    34. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 1
      Not going into your merits about bribing...

      Try reading that article in wikipedia, or other resources on the web. U.F.C was also about getting military to overthrow democratically elected governments.

      This is not your regular bribing company.

    35. Re:monoculture is a problem by phaggood · · Score: 1

      > add some ginger and spices

      Allspice? Nutmeg? Arsenic? A little more detail would be appreciated.

    36. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life...will find a way.

    37. Re:monoculture is a problem by ultranova · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The wild banana has genetic variation aplenty, but it's also disgusting.

      that's genetic variation to prevent the fruit from being eaten by two-legged straight-walking simians who do not spread the seeds/pollen. :-)

      If all the Cavendish bananas are clones of each other, then they must all be clones of some original Cavendish plant, and thus descendants of it. I find it likely that Cavendish banana plants - the descendants of a single banana plant - outnumber all the wild banana plants combined.

      Getting domesticated by humans is pretty much the evolutionary equivalent of winning the main prize in lottery.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    38. Re:monoculture is a problem by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      This history of banana republics is taught in American high schools as part of the standard curriculum. Don't fool yourself in to thinking you enlightened us with some dark secret. The only people who found that informative are those who slept through history class.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    39. Re:monoculture is a problem by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      A little of Cinnamon, cloves, chili powder, a couple of green chilies, a clove of garlic, a pinch of turmeric and a little bit of coriander powder and mint leaves if you can find them.

      I'd recommend mixing the spices and adding some mustard seeds to the oil before frying the plantains.

      Also, adding grated coconut after the spice is settled in adds a nice flavor. You could either cook it in oil, or add butter for a slightly different flavor.

      Or, if you know of an Indian store nearby, you could buy a generic brand of curry powder or Sambar powder and that will save you the trouble of the first section altogether. Your choice of spice will quite obviously affect the taste, but I've found that varying the spices provides me with variety, and plantains seem to taste alright as long as you don't over-spice or over-cook them.

      Cheers.

    40. Re:monoculture is a problem by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Take your wife to Puerto Rico and get them to teach her how to cook plantains. Oh, and swim in the bioluminescent bays when you're down there--they're badass.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    41. Re:monoculture is a problem by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And hundreds of years ago the American Indians were forced off their land by evil British colonists. Boycott Americans until they return the land to the natives! This same heinous act was done by the Dutch, French, and Spanish too. Boycott Danish goods because they were made by the descendents of African slaves!

      Only Klingons blame descendants for 7 generations.

    42. Re:monoculture is a problem by Inda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is same for most fruits; the ones I grow at home, anyway.

      If anyone has tried to grow an apple tree from a seed, they will know that the tree will not produce the same fruit that the seed came from. My apple trees are actually grafted on to quince root stocks. They are self-pollinating and disease resistant. I see no problems in monoculture - the breeders will adapt.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    43. Re:monoculture is a problem by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On a different scale, but they still do it today: Chiquita to plead guilty to ties with terrorists (March 14 2007)

      On the other hand, you can easily get fair trade biological bananas on the market. They taste better and encourage better ethics.

    44. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. "Curry" is the English description of any of a general variety of spicy dishes, according to WP. It's a lot like the idea of Barbeque sauce in the US...There are about a million kinds, different regions tend to have different kinds, and yet they're all called by the same name.

    45. Re:monoculture is a problem by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's not quite true. Cavendish bananas are the Wonder Bread of bananas. Most people who have tried other varieties think they're a bland shadow of what bananas should be.

      On the other hand, they're easy to grow and ship in large quantities. They're the only variety that you can harvest, ship half way around the world, and have then all ripen at the same time (right after they get to your local megamart).

    46. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the case you haven't noticed there is a lot more to Slashdot than just US-educated readers.

      Chiquitas sell a lot in, for instance, Europe; and I haven't met many Europeans familiar with the actual meaning of "banana republics".

    47. Re:monoculture is a problem by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I think the method of preparation has a lot to do with which foods we like. Anybody who says they don't like tofu just hasn't had it prepared well. Same goes for a lot of other foods that people say they don't like. There are some foods that I've just never liked. But they are quite rare.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    48. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 1
      I don't know about you.

      But I do see a difference between getting into military operations in 60s to interfere with other countries, than with stuff that happened hundreds of years ago (as you put it yourself).

    49. Re:monoculture is a problem by rve · · Score: 1

      as african varieties are also genetically different enough to resist the new cavendish-hungry fungus. Afraid not. In Africa too, the banana is a crop, grown in monocultures. They're different varieties, selected for qualities other than 'being able to survive oceanic transport', but bananas do not occur in the wild in Africa.
    50. Re:monoculture is a problem by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      And we are now seeing evidence that 10,000 years ago immigrants across the land-bridge from china took the land from earlier settlers... boycott casinos until indians return the land to those who have more dna from those historical ancestors.

      Fact is people fought over land and resources .. and given this 200 years of stability is a blink... will fight over land again.

      To say that a group of 10 people have the right to retain a huge body of land while 1,000 people are consigned to 100 sq.foot plots of land is unreasonable. And sooner or later that larger group is going to take the land of those 10 one way or another.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    51. Re:monoculture is a problem by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 1

      Mojito sauce? As in mint, lime, rum and club soda in a highball over ice?

      --
      Life would be easier if I had the source code.
    52. Re:monoculture is a problem by Falkkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not that scientists are oblivious to negative ramifications -- it's economics, specifically tragedy of the commons.

      If everyone else is cloning Tasty Profitable Banana, and you don't, you go out of business because either your bananas aren't Tasty or your bananas aren't Profitable. Therefore there's a penalty for maintaining variation, and the only potential benefit -- not having your whole crop wiped out by a blight -- isn't something you can bet on. Most likely, economic forces will drive you out of business long before your more varied gene pool can have any beneficial effect.

      There's a benefit to society (and the entire banana-growing industry) if there is a diverse gene pool, but no individual business has an incentive to maintain such a gene pool.

    53. Re:monoculture is a problem by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1
      Bananas are seedless only because they are bred from cuttings of a single seedless variety. We could have seed bred bananas that would be more resistant but then people would have to deal with seeds in their bananas and they are nasty and hard. Probably have a lot of folks with broken teeth.


      As an interesting note, when bananas became popularized in the early 20th century there were articles written on the proper way a woman could eat one without embarassing herself.

      By the way, I'm glad this article isn't also about Mississippi because I think I'd sprain a finger typing.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    54. Re:monoculture is a problem by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Chiquitas sell a lot in, for instance, Europe; and I haven't met many Europeans familiar with the actual meaning of "banana republics".

      Really? You did a survey? Or are you just assuming Europeans are clueless about this?

    55. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone tried eating the fungus yet? Perhaps it and the bananas do not taste very different. The neurotoxins that fusarium can put off are particularly yummy.
    56. Re:monoculture is a problem by ps236 · · Score: 1

      On that thinking, the USA should still be 'punished' for slavery, as they are still profiting from it, and the mess caused by that offense perpetuates to this day....

    57. Re:monoculture is a problem by lilomar · · Score: 1

      I don't know about other banannas, but Wonderbread (and it's copy-cats) is a bland shadow of what bread should be.

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    58. Re:monoculture is a problem by metlin · · Score: 1

      I did say it was South Indian - that narrows it down greatly, and the only difference is in a couple of ingredients and their ratios.

    59. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I see no problems in monoculture

      The fungi, molds, viruses, bacteria, and insects of the world thank you for your support.

    60. Re:monoculture is a problem by lilomar · · Score: 1

      Um..Cavendishes are perfectly edible when they are black too. It's when they have the most flavor, the texture isn't really to my taste, so when they get black, you mush them up and make smoothies or bread out of them (or anything else that calls for smashed bannas).

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    61. Re:monoculture is a problem by lilomar · · Score: 1

      Getting domesticated by humans is pretty much the evolutionary equivalent of winning the main prize in lottery. Including the over-spending, going broke, and subsequent depression that usually accompanies such winnings.
      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    62. Re:monoculture is a problem by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I LOVE fried plantain but I would never want to eat them raw like a Cavendish banana. It is all in the preparation.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    63. Re:monoculture is a problem by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Maybe where you live. There aren't any free trade bananas near me. Only the major brands. But when I did live in the Caribbean, I did eat the local bananas. They don't taste any different than the major brands. Thats all in your head.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    64. Re:monoculture is a problem by mzs · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you are talking about. There is this place a ways out here that I love to go to, a real greasy spoon but run by this Puerto Rican family. They make amazingly greasy sandwiches with flatten fried plantains instead of bread and I literally have had dreams craving for the stuff.

    65. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 1
      Actually, I am an European, and in my personal experience I have found that most Europeans are not familiar with the history of Central America.

      So while I did not conduct a survey using scientific criteria, I did conduct, what I would call, an informal survey on the topic through social contact. In other words I speak from personal experience.

      Now please, calm down, start making use of your reading skills, and re-read my post. I never said that Europeans were clueless about anything, I said that

      I haven't met many Europeans familiar with... etc. What is your problem with that?
    66. Re:monoculture is a problem by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      I don't know about other banannas, but Wonderbread (and it's copy-cats) is a bland shadow of what bread should be. Which was exactly the point he intended to make.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    67. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But those company's parent countries were defeated in war. Last time I checked, Guatemala and Nicaragua never invaded and defeated the United Fruit Company or the US. When they tried to resist we sent in the marines to force them into subugation or with a CIA led coup.

    68. Re:monoculture is a problem by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      But if these countries would stand up, take their own destinies in hand, quit putting forth corrupt leaders, they could do as they wished with their land.

      I sometimes find it hard to blame a company for taking advantage of the situation presented to it...if you have a land where all you have to do is throw a little cash to those in charge, to make a huge profit...who is gonna pass that by?

      If company "A" won't take advantage of it...there is always company "B" that will.

      The fault is with the country and its people not demanding more of their govt.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    69. Re:monoculture is a problem by lilomar · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oops, read that backwards, I thought he meant:

      Cavendish bananas are the Wonder Bread of bananas. Most people who have tried other varieties think they're(other varieties) a bland shadow of what bananas should be.
      Please post in lojban to avoid this problem. ;-D
      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    70. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Get a sense of perspective will you? It is not as if Chiquita stopped doing dirty operations a long time ago: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_v._Chiquita_Brands_International

    71. Re:monoculture is a problem by LameAssTheMity · · Score: 1

      Yet, the people in control now are still perpetrating the same crime.

      If a Japanese company built their business on the fact that they manufactured the bombs that destroyed Pearl Harbor, you might boycott them even though it happened 67 years ago.

    72. Re:monoculture is a problem by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Even though it's taught in schools, I bet most high schoolers would start talking about the other this if you asked them about banana republics.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    73. Re:monoculture is a problem by Applekid · · Score: 1

      I find it funny how the wikipedia article on Chiquita just mentions the name change but none of the history it was meant to hide Nice thing about that new-fangled Wikipedia is that anyone can edit any article as they see fit.
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    74. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like finding oil off of Nigera, what a boon it was for the locals!

    75. Re:monoculture is a problem by radish · · Score: 1

      I've no idea what you were eating but fried plantains are awesome - soft, sweet and delicious! Like the best banana you ever tasted - fried!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    76. Re:monoculture is a problem by torkus · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is the 'rushed ripening' they do with ethlyne gas (sp?) which winds up making them over-ripe before the flavor has had a chance to fully mature. You can eat a natually matured banana when it's brown speckled without it being mushy.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    77. Re:monoculture is a problem by digitrev · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a benefit to an individual business: to survive diseases like this. The problem is that's a long term benefit, and most businesses can't see past the next quarter, let alone the next decade.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    78. Re:monoculture is a problem by sans17 · · Score: 1

      You don't like little kids? You just don't know how to cook them well!

    79. Re:monoculture is a problem by torkus · · Score: 2, Funny

      slashdot - international cuisine for nerds

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    80. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst part about it is the fact that many of the people driving monoculture are trained scientists who, for some reason, are oblivious to its negative ramifications.

      I think they are totally aware of the problem, but feel they "are just doing their job." Not a scientist myself, just being presumptuous, but that is how I see it.

    81. Re:monoculture is a problem by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I bet that if you cooked it right, and didn't tell people what it was, that most people would think it tasted just fine.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    82. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      But if these countries would stand up, take their own destinies in hand, quit putting forth corrupt leaders, they could do as they wished with their land. If you actually read the articles, many of those countries tried to take matters in their own hands, by democratically electing leaders, who tried to establish control of their own lands, so that they could do as they wished with their own lands.

      Then they got foreign military (read US marines, and/or CIA) invading, and reestablishing the previous situation.

    83. Re:monoculture is a problem by Falkkin · · Score: 1

      I agree... my point is that the benefit is only a *potential* benefit, and that if all the other companies are ruthlessly cloning, you'll be out of business (due to selling bananas perceived as inferior) long before the benefit is likely to occur. So even if your company *is* looking past the next quarter, the fact that OTHER companies don't means that you will lose to them.

    84. Re:monoculture is a problem by pthisis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe you weren't eating the right ones. e.g. red bananas certainly have a different flavor from yellow Cavendishes.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    85. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "resistant to shipping conditions." And that is the most significant characteristic the Western agri-business is looking for. "Tasty" do not even register on their radar, which explain why typical fruit and vegetable on supermarket shelves are so uninteresting.

      So, Africa may have dozens of banana cultivars, but if they cannot be picked unripe and survive shipping, you'll never see them in US supermarkets.

    86. Re:monoculture is a problem by Yath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, raise their standard of living, but not enough to suit you.

      --
      I always mod up spelling trolls.
    87. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha! You actually married a drunk Puerto Rican? I seriously thought they were just for making fun of... and of course the occasional foray into things are white wives won't let us do... like double fisted butt sex.

    88. Re:monoculture is a problem by idontgno · · Score: 1

      That whip-smart 6-year-old Calvin has something eerily wise to say about this phenomenon:

      You can present the material, but you can't make me care.
      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    89. Re:monoculture is a problem by nuzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If a Japanese company built their business on the fact that they manufactured the bombs that destroyed Pearl Harbor, you might boycott them even though it happened 67 years ago.

      I take it Mitsubishi is off your list then?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    90. Re:monoculture is a problem by digitrev · · Score: 1

      I meant to keep and experiment on a stock of non standard bananas, not to sell them. Sorry for the lack of clarity.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    91. Re:monoculture is a problem by nuzak · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a soil fungus, it only goes as far as the roots. It kills the whole banana plant -- there's no fruit for you to try, fungus or not.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    92. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that their continued success, market dominance, profits to shareholders (including institutions which have held their shares for decades and continue to do so), current ability to pay big salaries to their executives, etc, etc are not founded on the blood profits from the bad era of the company?

      The only way to cleanse such a corporation is to liquidate and donate the proceeds to making amends. When they just change names and continue and try to be "nicer in the future", that's a bunch of bullshit unless they give up what they won.

    93. Re:monoculture is a problem by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      iirc the real problem is that the banana we know and love is made by a rare mutation of the natural banana plant. Unfortunately theese mutants are sterile.

      This means you can't selectively breed bananas in the usual sense, you just have to wait until the natural banana plants produce a mutant offspring that has decent properties and then clone it like hell.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    94. Re:monoculture is a problem by huckamania · · Score: 1

      I think most Americans will be stunned to learn that there is something they learned in school that the rest of the world didn't learn and at a much younger age.

      BTW, if you haven't seen Woody Allen's Bannannas, you should. It's a decent movie from his funny and interesting period.

    95. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that would be wrong because ....?

      Boycott any damned thing you want for any reason you want. Its getting OTHERS to boycott that matters.

    96. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A problem is that this fungus decimated the last generation of mass-produced bananas and only the cavendish survived. The fungus evolved to use the cavendish as food, too. Limited work is being done to make genetically resistant bananas, but the fungus already did a good job of attacking multiple varieties of banana.

    97. Re:monoculture is a problem by Danse · · Score: 1

      q[The worst part about it is the fact that many of the people driving monoculture are trained scientists who, for some reason, are oblivious to its negative ramifications.]q
      When your primary and overriding concern is your next quarterly profits report, you can pretty easily dismiss issues like this as being nebulous and speculative. Of course when they actually happen, you've got a problem, but that's what the lawyers and spin doctors are for.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    98. Re:monoculture is a problem by Danse · · Score: 1

      oops... been spending too much time on other boards and retardedly used the wrong quote tags :P

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    99. Re:monoculture is a problem by LameAssTheMity · · Score: 1

      It sure is now.

    100. Re:monoculture is a problem by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      A little of Cinnamon, cloves, chili powder, a couple of green chilies, a clove of garlic, a pinch of turmeric and a little bit of coriander powder and mint leaves if you can find them.


      You can have some plantain in there, too. I mean, if you really want to.
    101. Re:monoculture is a problem by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that's because all commercially valuable apple trees are hybrids. They're also grafted onto different rootstock, but that's s different issue: the varieties that have good root systems aren't the ones that produce the best fruit.

      The "crab apple" is simply an apple that is either not hybridized or if hybridized, selected for its flowering properties. They are often used to pollinate orchard trees. The fruit of the crab apple is often quite flavorful, it's just small and usually not very sweet. They make excellent additions to cider.

      All the apple varieties are genetic clones of each other: every Cortland Apple tree comes from cuttings of a single, ancestral Cortland.

      The phenomenon you describe is the reason for this. It is also a good illustration of the purpose of sexual reproduction: to increase genetic diversity by shuffling genes. You can try to inbreed genetic lines from McIntosh stock, but most fruit won't be edible, and those that are won't resemble McIntosh apples.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    102. Re:monoculture is a problem by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once upon a time I called Bonita to complain about bananas that rather than ripening from green through the spotted stage and finally to the sweet black phase (best for banana bread!) the green bananas would simply rot without ever becoming ripe.

      Bonita told me it was because they were not being ripened properly in storage (remember, bananas are picked VERY green), which involves keeping them in (ethylene? I forget too) gas at a particular temperature, so they will start to and continue to ripen correctly. If they're just stored in the plain air during the green phase, they will rot instead of ripening.

      ======

      I hadn't realised til I RTFA that the bananas of my childhood were gone... but it does explain the change I noticed starting in the 1960s, where the average banana was smaller and not as good anymore, and the brief period where I consider them edible as-is got even shorter (it had been a couple days, now it's only about 4 hours).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    103. Re:monoculture is a problem by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I mean, these are countries where government officials and local heavies EXPECT bribes and payoffs.

      You mean, like the USA?

      There's a saying, "Behind every great fortune is a great crime." It's as true in this country as it is anywhere else. The only difference? More people in the first world are in denial about the level of corruption at home.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    104. Re:monoculture is a problem by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. we focused on the WW1, the Depression and then WW2. Touched on the 50s a bit, but by then, HS was over. Not that I was happy about that. But it was ancient civ in middle school, then Western and US history in HS. By American history I mean from colonial times until about the wild west... but very little on what US companies were doing outside the US.

    105. Re:monoculture is a problem by jd · · Score: 1
      Most of the civilized parts of Europe had outlawed slavery by 1200 AD, with Britain being one of the last at outlawing it in 1770. The only western nations of any significance with active slavery after that were America and France. (And if you visit the Bible Belt today, you can see how much they resent that.) Indeed, although Britain now places modern sex slaves into witness protection programs, the importation of "modern" slaves into America and much of the EU from eastern Europe is every bit as extreme, cruel, violent and criminal as the worst of the worst of the slave triangle era. There might be a very reasonable case to be made for blacklisting and penalizing nations that ignore or encourage modern slave practices. This does not alter historic crimes, but ensures that the crimes of history do not become the crimes of tomorrow.

      And, ultimately, the question then turns to whether corporate crimes of the past (such as the subjugation of nation states for commercial exploitation) must be deault with as potential future threats. Is there evidence of corporations (Microsoft/ISO) controlling (Microsoft/DOJ) modern (Microsoft/Peru) nations in a way that is harmful to those nations and clearly for just the sole purpose of using political muscle for commercial exploitation? Well, yeah, there is. As such, it is entirely reasonable to regard this as an ongoing disease within society, even if the original carriers of the disease are no longer the major contributors of the infection.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    106. Re:monoculture is a problem by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Your American History class in HS should have taught you terms like "yellow journalism," "banana republic," as well as mentions of the Spanish-American War and other military actions.

      I've been out of HS for 10 years, but I certainly recall thinking "why would they name a clothing retailer after that?" while in history class in HS.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    107. Re:monoculture is a problem by mrcleaver · · Score: 1

      There goes all the major japanese and german industrial brands.

    108. Re:monoculture is a problem by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I was never taught this in 12 years of public school in the US. And my school was rated fairly highly

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    109. Re:monoculture is a problem by lartful_dodger · · Score: 1

      Monsanto has an alternative?
      Monsanto probably developed the new strain of the disease in their labs.
      I mean, why muck about trying to sell an 'improved' product when you can have the only product, by killing the alternatives?
      They're just not quite brave enough to try to make all wheat or soy but their patented varieties extinct yet. Better to experiment with plants that only Third World countries call staples.

      Call me cynical, but I've seen how these fuckers work.

      --
      The face of 'evil' is always the face of total need
    110. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. My standard High School curriculum consisted of 3 years of American (That's just USA, not latin America) History. Mostly stopping each year at about WWII. I took a European History elective for a little more variety, but we still basically only had white people history.

    111. Re:monoculture is a problem by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well, you think they should have, but didn't, at least for "banana republic." The other things you mentioned were covered, but not much time was spent, and cetainly it wasn't mentioned that banana trade had anything to do with it. Wikipedia doesn't either, but it does list a later war.. which apparently hasn't major enough to be included.

    112. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's like the Linux of the food world?

    113. Re:monoculture is a problem by vajaradakini · · Score: 1

      In other words, encouraging them to plant cash crops on soil unsuitable to the growth of cash crops instead of planting food that they can sustain them and those around them while depleting the soil of essential nutrients (because the farmers aren't paid enough to buy fertilizer for their land) until it can't grow anything at all thus lowering the local standard of living by a lot (i.e. everyone starves) and the big multinational company moves on to exploit another area.

      Something like that?

      --
      what's that now?
    114. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well between 1997 and 2004 Chiquita paid paramilitares in colombia for "protection", but they were really paying to kill labour unions, and funding a war where thousands have been killed, they were sued in the united states and got a fine of just U$25m, another bananas companies seem to be implicated also.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_v._Chiquita_Brands_International

      this are also the fuckers behind the banana massacre
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_massacre

    115. Re:monoculture is a problem by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Oh, you were talking about red bananas. I thought you were saying that fair traded Cavendish bananas tasted differently than non-fair traded Cavendish bananas. Yes red bananas do taste differently. They are available where i live, but they are also grown by the large companies.

      There is another yellow banana that tastes differently than the Cavendish. The locals called it the sweet banana. I don't know its western breed name, but I'd like to think that it was a pocket of Gros Micheal's that survived.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    116. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's in the too distant past,just boycott them for funding death squads in 2007, then.

    117. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chiquita Brands International Pleads Guilty to
      Making Payments to a Designated Terrorist Organization
      And Agrees to Pay $25 Million Fine"

      http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2007/March/07_nsd_161.html

    118. Re:monoculture is a problem by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The worst part about it is the fact that many of the people driving monoculture are trained scientists who, for some reason, are oblivious to its negative ramifications.


      The people driving it (whether or not trained as scientists at some point) are corporate executives for whom the short-term ramifications are positive financial benefits for themselves, and any negative ramifications are more distant and distributed to a large number of other people.

      That people discount consequences that both are distant and borne mostly by other people is not at all surprising. If it wasn't for that fact, there would be very little reason to have governments at all.
    119. Re:monoculture is a problem by dwywit · · Score: 1
      Amen Brother - we here in Oz grow a few varieties, and somehow they manage to sell Cavs in some volume.

      There's a much nicer variety known as "Lady Finger" which are smaller than the Cav, but MUCH tastier, sweeter and not as astringent, and resistant to diseases that afflict Cavs.

      Anybody know if "bunchy top" is the same as fusarium wilt?

      I've some Lady Fingers growing in my backyard, and they seem to propagate by shoots. Each tree sends up one or two sideshoots, and we cut down the main tree after the bunch has ripened, then cut out all but the best and strongest-looking shoots. I suppose that makes these clones too, although there must be some variation.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    120. Re:monoculture is a problem by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      I happen to be a Banana Republican you insensitive clod!

    121. Re:monoculture is a problem by dwye · · Score: 1
      > Only Klingons blame descendants for 7 generations.

      Ask the Irish about Strongbow (aka, Richard deClare) sometime. 837 years, and they are still ticked off at him. And he wasn't even really English.

    122. Re:monoculture is a problem by TheLink · · Score: 1

      But why? They'd say "let someone else do it".

      Then when stuff happens, if the corporations go under the people running it get a golden parachute - not their fault since it was industry standard practice. And move on to some other company.

      If the corporation doesn't go under, they'll just start cloning and perhaps modifying your breeds. You won't have such a great headstart on them.

      --
    123. Re:monoculture is a problem by TheLink · · Score: 1

      You missed the "On the other hand" bit.

      --
    124. Re:monoculture is a problem by TheLink · · Score: 1

      That's not such a fair test. You have to cook and prepare it first.

      You could similarly say: go to your local European food store and ask for Potato. Eat it (note that Potatoes are usually cooked first).

      Raw potato isn't very nice. Cooked it's not bad. So cooked plantain might be nice.

      --
    125. Re:monoculture is a problem by zsau · · Score: 1

      Hence why we bother having Universities and Governments. As a proportion of their total spending, keeping a diversity of bananas growing, not for commercial reasons, but for research and the benefit of the citizenry in the future.

      On the other hand, as far as I know there's plenty of other banana species out there, just none that are the sort we're most used to. The real problem is probably that you can't use the banana's seeds to create comparable bananas, much as the seed of apples and the stone of nectarines won't make a tree that'll produce the same fruit. In that case, we might lose the current bananas, like we did before, but the world will go on and at worst when we're 80 year old codgers will be saying "oh my they don't make things like they used to. why, i remember back in the day when our cars ran on petrol. now that was mighty impressive. you could go as far and as fast as you wanted before filling up, and it only cost tuppence per gallon. do you remember when they raised the price to thruppence per gallon? oh weren't their riots in the streets then! and oh, do you remember the old bananas we used to have oh my yes, ...".

      --
      Look out!
    126. Re:monoculture is a problem by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      But if these countries would stand up, take their own destinies in hand, quit putting forth corrupt leaders, they could do as they wished with their land.

      They tried that, however gunboat diplomacy ended their dreams.

      Falcon
    127. Re:monoculture is a problem by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 1

      Don't forget BMW. The Quandt family, who owns 47% of the corporation (which includes BMW, Rolls-Royce, and Mini) hasn't even apologized. Volkswagen Group (VW, Audi, SEAT, Åkoda, Bentley, Lamborghini, Bugatti, VW Commercial Vehicles, and Scania) and Daimler (Mercedes-Benz, Smart, Maybach, and Freightliner) have both apologized and issued reparations (most of Israel's taxi fleet is Benzes and Åkodas) http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/25/documentary-implicates-bmws-controlling-shareholders-in-war-cri/

    128. Re:monoculture is a problem by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's "Skoda" with a caron (upside-down ^) over the S but Slashdot doesn't support those...

    129. Re:monoculture is a problem by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      So no Toyota, Mitsubishi or Volkswagons for you ever right? Going to hold you to that.

    130. Re:monoculture is a problem by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Hence why we bother having Universities and Governments. As a proportion of their total spending, keeping a diversity of bananas growing, not for commercial reasons, but for research and the benefit of the citizenry in the future.

      I don't recall which one but a university in Mexico is doing that with corn. This University grows many different types of corn found in Mexico in closed green houses to prevent cross pollination.

      Falcon
    131. Re:monoculture is a problem by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Same here.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    132. Re:monoculture is a problem by nebosuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the moment I'm working in the bio/ag-tech industry and can see the same thing coming down the road in the wheat/corn/soybeans/milo industry, where big industry players have foolishly limited the gene pool in the name of profit.

      Sorry if I seem rude here, but you must not have a very good understanding of your company, or it must be one of the few smaller companies who generally only maintain/propagate existing varieties, or you are being intentionally vague when you say 'bio/ag-tech industry' and don't work in any directly relevant field at all.

      Either that or I better tell a bunch of my coworkers that I heard on the internets that their entire international department, dedicated to allelic diversity, does not exist. In that case a bunch of my former coworkers at a previous place of employment will be facing a serious existential crisis as well.

    133. Re:monoculture is a problem by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I mean, why muck about trying to sell an 'improved' product when you can have the only product, by killing the alternatives?
      Microsoft, Monsanto. Easy to get them confused, they're next to each other in the dictionary.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    134. Re:monoculture is a problem by mpe · · Score: 1

      At the moment I'm working in the bio/ag-tech industry and can see the same thing coming down the road in the wheat/corn/soybeans/milo industry, where big industry players have foolishly limited the gene pool in the name of profit.

      Supermarkets like the idea of uniform products, especially with fruits (including the likes of tomatoes, cucumbers, etc which many people don't think of as "fruits"). Quite likely the corporations transporting them (sometimes half way across the planet) want them uniform since it makes packaging easier.

    135. Re:monoculture is a problem by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Yes, but with apples there are dozens of commercially viable and widely-grown cultivars. Grimes, for instance, are significantly different from Yellow D. Jonathan are *very* different from Mac. I'm not going to turn this post into a ramble about apple cultivars, but there are lots of them.

      With bananas there are perhaps half a dozen widely-grown and potentially commercially viable cultivars, most of which have not gained widespread consumer acceptance. Around here you can really only buy two varieties (the longer straighter ones that are lighter yellow when ripe and the shorter more regularly curved ones that are a darker yellow when ripe), and despite the obvious differences I think they're both variants of Cavendish.

      There's probably more variation _overall_ in bananas, but almost all of the varieties are not worth cultivating on any significant scale, either because they're not hardy enough or because there's no market for their fruit.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    136. Re:monoculture is a problem by hassanchop · · Score: 1

      Those sitting at Chiquita today did not cause the offense. But they still make profits out of it


      This is true of any major German or Japanese company as well.

      and the mess caused by that offense perpetuates to this day.


      Honestly, that smacks of a cheap propaganda play. If the population wanted change, they have the power and responsibility to make it. The fact that they haven't says a lot.

      It sounds very much like you're going to find something to whinge about regarding Chiquita, regardless of their actual involvement.

      In fact, you sound very much like the reparationists in the US insisting they're justified in their racism. Their arguments align quite closely with yours. And frankly, they're just as ridiculous.
    137. Re:monoculture is a problem by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If everyone else is cloning Tasty Profitable Banana, and you don't, you go out of business
      > because either your bananas aren't Tasty or your bananas aren't Profitable. Therefore there's
      > a penalty for maintaining variation, and the only potential benefit -- not having your whole
      > crop wiped out by a blight -- isn't something you can bet on.

      Apparently you are not familiar with the Law of Successful Gambling: never make a bet unless you know you can win. There are two ways to know you can win: by something you know, or by something you do. The first is the easier to pull off, but only when the opportunity presents itself. The other party has to be betting in ignorance, unaware of certain facts that make his wager untenable.

      The second way is the one that seems more applicable here: if your competitor is cloning Tasty Profitable Banana, and your business is built around a larger number of (or hardier) cultivars, you don't just *hope* for a blight: you *arrange* one. This is widely considered unethical, but that won't necessarily stop a company from doing it.

      (I'm not saying that's what's happened with the Panama-disease strain that attacks Cavendish. I don't know that there's any major company in the position to benefit significantly in this instance. The people who introduced Goldfinger, for instance, also grow and profit from Cavendish on a large scale, and there's some real doubt as to whether they could sell Goldfinger to the most lucrative Cavendish markets (Europe and the US) even if Cavendish goes away, so they seem an unlikely culprit.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    138. Re:monoculture is a problem by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, the defense against this attack is to go ahead and clone Tasty Profitable Banana, but *also* put some R&D effort into finding other potentially commercially viable varieties and developing a knowledge base on how best to cultivate them and so forth. That way you make the larger profit now (by selling TPB), *and* you are prepared. This puts the competitor, who was banking on being able to wipe you out with blight, back in the position of *not* being able to do so, which means he may as well clone Tasty Profitable Banana (in addition to his variety-cultivating) and compete with you on equal footing. Everyone can continue to sell TPB, but everyone also has something else to resort to if a TPB blight comes around. Everyone wins, and the only major cost is a few R&D dollars. A certain amount of R&D spending is always advisable anyway, so.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    139. Re:monoculture is a problem by rush242 · · Score: 1

      Or, of course, the 3 or 4 big banana companies of the earth (which are all 'western'), will jump into the void and start exploiting African banana farmers, let them work in dangerous conditions, using chemicals, and not nearly paying them enough to make a proper living. So more or less re-create the current status quo in latin-american banana farming but now in africa... So what? You aren't going to give those people jobs. If it's so important to you, get everyone who feels like you together and pay them whatever you wish. Pay them $500K a year if you want to. At least then you will be providing jobs and income and stability, whereas right now, you're doing nothing for them at all. Oh well, except, patting yourself on the back for showing everyone how much you care, and having pwn3d those eeeevil corporations. You don't help anyone by posting here, you don't help anyone by not providing jobs that others are willing to (and then denigrating them for doing so) and you certainly don't help the poor people of anywhere by looking at their limited choices and then removing the one they actually chose.
    140. Re:monoculture is a problem by Ax+of+Ganto · · Score: 1

      la kavendic. goi ko'a na xamgu vrusi teva'u lo drata badna .iku'i le nu bevri ko'a cu frili fi le ni barda

    141. Re:monoculture is a problem by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well I did say to name just a few.
      The thing is that for most part that was a long time ago. The employees of the companies are different people, the stock holders are different people, and there does have to a time when forgiveness becomes justice.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    142. Re:monoculture is a problem by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Nigerian wives, Caribbean wives, Puerto Rican wives, Indian wives... Good to see slashdot won't be having the problem of monoculture!

    143. Re:monoculture is a problem by smithmc · · Score: 1

      And here is why I *never* *ever* buy Chiquita (new name for United Fruit Company) products:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

      I find it funny how the wikipedia article on Chiquita just mentions the name change but none of the history it was meant to hide
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiquita_Brands_International

      Oh, boy. And I assume you would never buy a Volkswagen, or a Mitsubishi, and of course you would never buy anything from any of those nasty evil corporations that do business with China, or supply CCTV equipment for the Big Brother regime in the UK, etc. etc. right?
      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    144. Re:monoculture is a problem by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      Oh, boy. And I assume you would never buy a Volkswagen, or a Mitsubishi, and of course you would never buy anything from any of those nasty evil corporations that do business with China, or supply CCTV equipment for the Big Brother regime in the UK, etc. etc. right? I guess I see a difference between these because:

      1. VW, and Mitsubishi coutries were beaten at war, and I can only expect that the war crimes were dealt with.
      2. Second, you completely mis the point with the CCTV comparison. Chiquita was not selling bananas to evil people. Chiquita was directly corrupting governments, and financing the destruction of the governments that wouldn't be corrupted.

      BTW, as I mentioned elsewhere it is not as if they have stopped these practices
      http://www.peuples-solidaires.org/article801.html
      http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2952161&page=1

    145. Re:monoculture is a problem by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      I've had salt and pepper tofu supposedly done nicely according to my Asian friends. They enjoyed it. I thought it tasted like a salt and pepper waste of space. Better than salt and pepper styrofoam, but I still fail to see a good use for it except as filler. In hot and sour soup it's fine as filler to add texture. But to say I like it would be like declaring I like cabbage because I like cole slaw. Cabbage and tofu just aren't foods worth making a big or small deal of.

    146. Re:monoculture is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh yeaaah.
      The banana shortage happened in 1923.
      Sooooo.
      Yeah about 80 years or so.
      Jackass.

  4. Re:Oh noes! by lordofthechia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slow news day? I think any story about a major threat to our food supply to be a major one, plus it mentions "Banana Scientists"! What is there not to love?

    --
    Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  5. 300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to Banana.com there are over 300 different species of bananas, not all edible. I'm fairly certain that not all the edible species will be susceptibe to the blight. This might actually be a good thing in the long run as different species have different flavors and textures. They may even be better for us from a nutritional perspective than the Cavendish. The growers will need to adapt if the blight can't be stopped or contained.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
    1. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      And that is the key to this.

      The Cavendish is actually a very inferior banana. It's simply tougher and cheap to transport compared to the other varieties. the Banana companies are panicking because they will have to change how they do business and they dont want to.

      Honestly, if you can get to try some of the other bananas out there, you'll never EVER touch the bland yucky Cavendish again. The growers brought this on themselves, the same way the last blight took out the favorite that was EVEN easier to ship and transport but had the advantage of tasting way better than the current offering.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news, there's a Banana.com.

    3. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a Banana.org

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    4. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by kericr · · Score: 1

      300 Species? That's madness!

      Madness? THIS! IS! BANANAS!

    5. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So... you're saying that we're not hitting peak banana, just peak cheap banana.

    6. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      "the Banana companies are panicking because they will have to change how they do business and they dont want to."

      Maybe their next move will be to have BRM (banana rights management) legislation enacted.

    7. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by RealErmine · · Score: 1

      In other news, there's a Banana.com. Which, quite alarmingly, features what looks like a Red/Blue stereoscopic image of a donkey carrying bunches of bananas. I can't seem to wrap my head around the reason why this image would be desired in that format.
      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    8. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if you can get to try some of the other bananas out there, you'll never EVER touch the bland yucky Cavendish again.

      To each his own I guess. But why do so many people dislike the Cavendish? They're quite tasty if you let them ripen for a few days (or week). I find them at their best when you see it fully yellow with some slight few brown spots. If it's greenish-yellow or just turned fully yellow, they're often too firm and bland. Too ripe and they become very sweet and mushy.

      Is it me, or do most people not know when the right "ripe time" to eat a Cavendish?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      I actually prefer Spanish "platanos" (plantains)
      They're quite delicious, but they only taste good raw when the skin is completely black.
      They're much bigger/beefier with a much sweeter flavor and denser, less 'aerated' and bland of the commonly found cavendish.
      Kind of like the difference between 'Wonderbread" and a hearty whole wheat bread.
      The only problem is they take a damn long time to ripen from yellow to black, (around a week), so patience and planning is key.

    10. Re:300 Species, Probably Not All Susceptible by titmfatied · · Score: 1

      I think it has more to do with the Cavendish being so common. If it was rare people would promote it's delicate flavor and it not being overly sweet.

  6. Seriously people? by Netochka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This story pops up every 6 months or so (I guess not here, but in general)... Has no one else heard about this banana scare story about 10 times before?? There's even a snopes article about it. Banana Extinction

    1. Re:Seriously people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Snopes basically said the exact same thing. The cavendish bananna will be extinct. Snopes is playing semantics by saying that all bananas won't be effected, but the only one eaten by americans is the cavendish, so yes, the bananna as we know it will be extinct. Just like the bananna your grandparents knew is already extinct.

    2. Re:Seriously people? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your correct. But the US Media is running out of things to scare the people about.

      The article is less to do on bananas going extinct then rather trying to sell GM crops to the public.

    3. Re:Seriously people? by Rogerborg · · Score: 0

      Bullshit Snopes article; bananas aren't a "fruit", they're properly a form of soft gravel.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Seriously people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it pops up every 6 months because it's happening? They did say that the blight is hitting areas other than in the Americas. There are hundreds of other banana varieties, but if they are full of seeds or taste like turnips they probably wont be a big success with the general public.

      Most people don't realize how fragile our world food supply is. We've had it good for the past 50 years but with intensive agriculture and world travel, all it would take to wipe out the world's wheat, rice, or whatever plant crop is a fungus to appear that attacks two or three varieties of the same grain.

    5. Re:Seriously people? by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      but the only one eaten by americans is the cavendish

      When I was in Bali I ate several different varieties of banana, and they were all much more tasty than the "bog-standard" Cavendish. So maybe this isn't such a bad thing after all.

      Rich.

    6. Re:Seriously people? by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      The article you linked to says nothing about 'soft gravel' and seems fairly adamant that it is a fruit.

    7. Re:Seriously people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Seriously people? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      When I was in Bali I ate several different varieties of banana, and they were all much more tasty than the "bog-standard" Cavendish.

      The variety may play a part, but I bet the bananas you ate were locally grown and picked when ripe - not green and shoved into cold storage. The fruit and veg. sold in supermarkets is selected for long shelf life - not flavour.

    9. Re:Seriously people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect (s)he is making a pun on 'aggregate'.

    10. Re:Seriously people? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      EPIC FAIL on your Turing Test.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:Seriously people? by laejoh · · Score: 0, Funny

      You're absolutely right,

      until netcraft confirms babanas are dying I won't believe it at all!

    12. Re:Seriously people? by datapharmer · · Score: 5, Informative

      bananas are supposed to be picked green. they get woody (tough with bitter flavor) if left on the tree to ripen. To get them to be sweeter the blossom is cut off after an incomplete row of banana hands is made which concentrates the growth into the existing bananas instead of attempts to make more.

      --
      Get a web developer
    13. Re:Seriously people? by rwiggers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      looks like you never ate one banana that got ripen on the tree. It is much sweeter and tastes much better. Now, if you are doing it commercially, you better find a way of keeping birds and some other animals very far of it, as they tend to make holes in every single banana they find.

    14. Re:Seriously people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your correct. Sorry, I just can't let this bad english go uncorrected. The correct way to right this sentence is "Your correction.
    15. Re:Seriously people? by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      Ah, one of those wonderfully helpful and insightful posts Slashdot is famed for.

      Would you care to explain your original comment? Does the phrase "soft gravel" have some meaning that we the the UK are unfamiliar with?

    16. Re:Seriously people? by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      Never mind, i get it now. Rather disappointing that an AC was more helpful.

    17. Re:Seriously people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up the word 'Aggregate'...

    18. Re:Seriously people? by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

      Ah, one of those wonderfully helpful and insightful posts Slashdot is famed for. Or flamed for. ;-)

      Just take it as a mildly funny oxymoron (e.g., military intelligence, honest politician) and get on with life.
      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    19. Re:Seriously people? by Rogerborg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      When you're disappointed by something you read on Slashdot, it's probably time to bring some meaning to your life. Since having kids is clearly out, I suggest that you respond in the affirmative next time you're offered a free personality test.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    20. Re:Seriously people? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The bananas we eat now have been a sterile line of clones for decades. That's pretty genetically modified.

    21. Re:Seriously people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story pops up every 6 months or so (I guess not here, but in general)... Has no one else heard about this banana scare story about 10 times before??

      There's even a snopes article about it.
      Banana Extinction Sorry but, by now, you should know better. This is Slashdot - we wait until netcraft confirms it.
    22. Re:Seriously people? by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      No, I let some bananas get ripe on the tree once. They were horrible. At least the varieties of bananas I've grown are much better if pulled off before yellow.

      according to plant answers: "Bananas ripen best if removed from the plant after reaching the rounded ridge maturity. Bananas will ripen slowly if left on the plant but often burst and spoil. Few of the ripening changes proceed well in banana fruits left to ripen on the tree: starch remains high while the sugar remains lower than in fruit ripened off the tree."

      according to How To Do Things: "To harvest bananas: Use the machete and cut the stem of the green banana cluster above the first hand, or grouping, of bananas, leaving a good amount of stem."

      according to california rare fruit growers: "The [banana] fruit can be harvested by cutting the stalk when the bananas are plump but green."

      --
      Get a web developer
    23. Re:Seriously people? by himself · · Score: 1

      datapharmer wrote:
      >
      > To get them to be sweeter the blossom is cut off after an incomplete row of banana hands is made...
      >
            Are banana hands anything like jazz hands?

    24. Re:Seriously people? by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      Only in that banana hands look similar to jazz hands when attached to the stalk... other than that they are dissimilar and I like banana hands better. Banana hands are sweet and delicious while jazz hands often have a bitter taste of cigar smoke, cheap whiskey, or opiate residue depending on the variety.

      --
      Get a web developer
    25. Re:Seriously people? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Your correct. But the US Media is running out of things to scare the people about.

      Articles like this have been published in science magazine too though. From "SciAm", "Can Science Save the Banana?"[podcast].

      Falcon
    26. Re:Seriously people? by nebosuke · · Score: 1

      looks like you never ate one banana that got ripen on the tree. It is much sweeter and tastes much better.

      What variety are you referring to? The opposite is true for all 3 varieties that I've had growing in my yard for over a decade. The bananas are less sweet and much more tart if left to ripen on the tree.

      What you say about the birds, however, is sadly all too true.

    27. Re:Seriously people? by rwiggers · · Score: 1

      Sometimes here we let it ripe on the tree exactly for calling some birds... I don't know the name of the variety in english, we call it "branca", "white".

  7. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm a bit dismayed over the reactions of some posters. Without sounding too much like a liberal douche, it's easy for us to laugh at a lack of bananas but what of farmers who depends on a healthy crop? Not to mention people going hungry.

    1. Re:What? by hansraj · · Score: 1

      Yeah true. They will go bananas if something is not done!

    2. Re:What? by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

      Without sounding too much like a liberal douche, I'll preface my remarks with the following statement: without sounding like a heartless bastard that wants to see babies starve to death as they cling to their emaciated mothers,

      it's easy for us to laugh at a lack of bananas Bananas are a funny food. For most people in the Western world, it's a novelty food.

      but what of farmers who depends on a healthy crop? Hopefully those farmers will be smart enough to invest in a new food. Those that can't or won't have the option to sell their land.

      Not to mention people going hungry. We got hungry people in the United States, too. Let's fix our own house before we start crying about our neighbor.
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  8. Hmm. by ledow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Single, cloned fruit, unable to reproduce except by human intervention, with identical genetic structure in virtually all examples, cloned and distributed worldwide for decades is susceptible to the same attacking fungus that attacked the previous single, cloned fruit with identical genetic structure, but which has mutated slightly (my conjecture) in order to attack it's replacement.

    And all because people don't like seeds in their fruit? (I would guess this isn't true, most probably people wouldn't really care much anyway, given that the fruit has an inedible skin too and a lot of popular fruits have seeds).

    It's hardly surprising, it's only "catastrophic" because we've deliberately propogated a single, genetically-identical (and I would hazard "faulty", due to it's inability to reproduce) plant over and over and over again.

    1. Re:Hmm. by Cairnarvon · · Score: 5, Informative

      One word: http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/pics/wildbanana.jpg

      There's a reason modern bananas have been bred to be seedless.

    2. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *inedible* skin you say?

      shit

    3. Re:Hmm. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yikes!

      That's like those horror images you see, like the ones the dentist shows you - "clean your teeth children, or they'll look like... THIS!".

      Eat your vegetables children, or you'll have to eat bananas.. like THIS!

    4. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never eaten a banana with seeds? Nasty.

    5. Re:Hmm. by beh · · Score: 1

      Hmm - what will happen to the fungus, once the banana is extinct? It will probably have to change, and quick, right?

      So - if the spread is going THAT fast, can't we put enough seeds of the bananas in safe storage somewhere let the wilt kill the bananas and bring them back 5-10 years later? (and obviously in the meantime we would need to find something else to grow to provide us with food). Unlike animals going extinct, we should be able to keep virtually any number of seeds back to re-introduce again at a later stage. (With animals you would only be able to keep a 'few' alive somewhere and would later need to give them time to breed and give them an opportunity to re-establish themselves in the wilderness - both rather long term issues. With plants that should be less of a problem, shouldn't it?

    6. Re:Hmm. by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      The fungus may be able to grow on things other than bananas.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    7. Re:Hmm. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      can't we put enough seeds of the bananas in safe storage somewhere let the wilt kill the bananas and bring them back 5-10 years later?

      The trees you eat bananas from don't have seeds. A part of one banana tree is cut off then grown to make a second tree. Bananas with seeds looks like this.

      Falcon
    8. Re:Hmm. by audunr · · Score: 1

      Better seeds than brains: http://rundberg.no/audun/wildbananas.png

  9. Howzabout a forced Jurassic Park approach? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freeze a few seeds or DNA or whatever we need to make new bananas . . . Then kill off all the trees we have. No banana trees will mean no way for the disease to spread, and it will die off. Then thaw out the bananas we have, and start again.

    There are probably about 300 things wrong with this plan.

    That said, where can I get my hands on one of these tastier bananas of my forefathers?

    1. Re:Howzabout a forced Jurassic Park approach? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No (or few) seeds. But you could have areas cut of from the rest of the world (green houses somewhere) with the plants in.

    2. Re:Howzabout a forced Jurassic Park approach? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Most fungus spores can live a long, long, LONG time without germinating. How would you propose we clean up every bit of fungus?

      The answer is varied breeds rather than relying on the clone of a clone of a clone.

    3. Re:Howzabout a forced Jurassic Park approach? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Can the spores survive bing nuked? Ideally, from orbit.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Howzabout a forced Jurassic Park approach? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      After all, it's the only way to be sure.

    5. Re:Howzabout a forced Jurassic Park approach? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Your ideas are well suited to my plans. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  10. Will someone... by draxredd · · Score: 5, Funny

    think of the monkeys !

    --
    --- Back to the trees, back to the trees !
    1. Re:Will someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You intensive clod, everyone knows Green Tree Frogs eat bananas..

    2. Re:Will someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      think of the monkeys ! The story brings up Africa doesn't it?
  11. Call DK by cybereal · · Score: 3, Funny

    All I can think of is the cave at the beginning of the first level in Donkey Kong Country for SNES. When you enter the cave, DK sees that his banana pile is all gone and is sad.

    Clearly this is a viral commercial for the next DK Country! DK Country Wii: Panama Disease Adventure!

    --
    I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
  12. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. News of this magnitude is vital to any geek, or am I the only one that likes banana splits?

    (seriously tho, this is scary, I hope its possible to find a way to solve, or dodge this problem)

  13. Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by DingerX · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, was granpa's banana more slippery? 'Cos that would explain their widespread use as comic devices in the pre-television era. (And, no, I never thought about asking Grandma about Granpa's banana, codenamed "Big Mike." Pervert.)

    1. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by audunr · · Score: 1

      According to an article I read this weekend, after United Fruit Company started importing bananas to the U.S. around 1900, bananas were actually so popular that there was a real danger of stepping on one if you walked down the street. Urban legend, perhaps. The article was based mainly on two books: http://www.amazon.com/Bananas-United-Fruit-Company-Shaped/dp/1841958816/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212404832&sr=8-1 and http://www.amazon.com/Banana-Fate-Fruit-Changed-World/dp/1594630380/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212404832&sr=8-2

    2. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by ThreeGigs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, was granpa's banana more slippery?
      Actually, that's a slightly hedged 'yes'.
      Grampa's banana had a thicker, more durable skin, in addition to being larger than the bananas we youngun's know so well.
      The other reason it's so popular as comic relief is because it actually was a real hazard back around 1915-ish. As a 'portable' fruit, they were handy to carry anywhere, and without streetcorner trash cans, the peels got tossed on the sidewalk as often as not. And considering bananas are (and were) the most popular fruit in the US (almost twice as popular as the good ol' apple), it really was a normal hazard. The Boy Scout handbook of 1914 actually listed removing a banana peel from the sidewalk as a 'good deed', it was that common an occurence.

      As a side effect though, it *did* start many cities putting trash cans on busy streets, and enacting littering laws.

    3. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by Anzya · · Score: 1

      Actually, I belive that Brainiac tried this out and found that banan peels actually are very slippery :)

      --
      "This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (or STFU, for you un-hip people)."
    4. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny enough, I almost had an incident about a year ago with the current bananas. I was walking home from campus and my foot slipped out from under me. I almost took a spill but managed to regain composure. Turns out it was a decomposing banana that the trash guys had happened to knock onto the ground.

      I had to sit down because I was laughing so hard. I never expected to ever slip on a banana peel in my life time. I laughed ever harder when I remembered I saw the banana in the morning walking to campus and thought 'Silly banana peels. You just aren't so effective of a threat anymore.' Watch out - those guys are a busted ankle or hip just lying in wait.

    5. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by tooslickvan · · Score: 1

      Grampa's banana had a thicker, more durable skin... Perhaps you want to rephrase that.
    6. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by jcoleman · · Score: 1

      My 88-year-old (at the time, she's 94 now) grandmother actually broke her hip when she slipped on a banana peel near a bus stop. We teased her about it for weeks after her speedy and complete recovery after a hip replacement.

    7. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by jcoleman · · Score: 1

      (And, no, I never thought about asking Grandma about Granpa's banana, codenamed "Big Mike." Pervert.) I see what you did there.
    8. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by Danse · · Score: 1

      One of the guys I worked with actually slipped on a banana peel a while back. He said that he saw it too late and as he slipped he could only think that this was only supposed to happen in cartoons and that nobody would believe him.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    9. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by MojoStan · · Score: 1

      Subject: Higher friction on the Gros Michel?

      So, was granpa's banana more slippery? 'Cos that would explain their widespread use as comic devices in the pre-television era.

      Am I the only perv who initially thought "higher friction" was referring to a "ribbed for her pleasure" quality of Gros Michel bananas of the past, thus making it popular for dildo jokes? I'd forgotten about "step on a slippery banana peel" jokes.

      I'm so ashamed.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    10. Re:Higher friction on the Gros Michel? by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Aye, should be lower friction. I missed.

  14. Clone! by krischik · · Score: 2, Informative

    This post 2 down the row will answer you question nicely:

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=570567&cid=23624829

    We just don't eat - or get offered to eat - the other 299 species.

  15. Yes, we have no bananas! by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Funny

    We have no bananas today!

    1. Re:Yes, we have no bananas! by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

      ... bananas is Scranton, PA.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    2. Re:Yes, we have no bananas! by JazMuadDib · · Score: 1

      That sure mushed-a been somethin'! Thirty thousand pounds of mashed bananas!

    3. Re:Yes, we have no bananas! by pohl · · Score: 1

      Maybe we'll get a new song when the blight eradicates the Cavendish. The one you're refering to was written during the demise of the Gros Michel:

      "(Some of the shortages during that time entered the fabric of popular culture; the 1923 musical hit ÃâYes! We Have No BananasÃâ is said to have been written after songwriters Frank Silver and Irving Cohn were denied in an attempt to purchase their favorite fruit by a syntactically colorful, out-of-stock neighborhood grocer.)"

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    4. Re:Yes, we have no bananas! by Spackler · · Score: 1

      I was SO going to say that.
      Now that I see it just got +3 I am glad I did not waste the karma time.

  16. RTFA... There's actually more to it! by stormguard2099 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know it's against the rules but if you RTFA the interesting part isn't about the blight spreading through the bananas. As others have posted this is not something that sprang up over night, it's been coming for quite a while now.
    The truly interesting part is that the banana companies in S. America still don't see this as a problem. TFA says that in their anual summaries they don't even mention this disease much less list it as a threat. I think the issue is much more about these companies' failure to act before it's too late than that nature is running its course.

    --
    http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    1. Re:RTFA... There's actually more to it! by thermian · · Score: 1

      The truly interesting part is that the banana companies in S. America still don't see this as a problem. TFA says that in their anual summaries they don't even mention this disease much less list it as a threat.

      What, you mean a huge company isn't making a big deal in public about a potential threat to its entire business?

      Go figure...

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    2. Re:RTFA... There's actually more to it! by maxume · · Score: 1

      At least someone is working to find a new commercial king:

      http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2005-06/can-fruit-be-saved

      And the lesson of the Cavendish, as far as the growers are concerned, is that a single variety can last up to 50 years, not that a single variety is extra susceptible to disease.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:RTFA... There's actually more to it! by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of put it out there and do damage control before stories like this hit the 6 o clock news and mothers stop buying bananas to "save the children", that sort of stuff

      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
  17. Re:Oh noes! by aliquis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly, how does extinction / loss of a food supply / mutating desease which have earlier almost killed a whole industry become small news? I would more likely find it the biggest news this day on Slashdot, time will tell.

    I guess he just don't eat bananas.

  18. So ... by ezzthetic · · Score: 1

    this shit isn't bananas?

    --
    You know what they say about opinions. They're all fabulous!
    1. Re:So ... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      this shit isn't bananas? And you are a hollaback girl?
      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  19. All bananas are that similar? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    Seriously, do they grow bananas like the Irish used to grow potatoes?

    1. Re:All bananas are that similar? by maxume · · Score: 1

      It is much worse than that analogy would imply. The bananas purchased in most western supermarkets today are all descendants of cuttings that were taken from a single tree (they are cuttings of cuttings of cuttings of cuttings). They are essentially the same individual. The potatoes were just the same variety, they were reproducing normally.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  20. Finally we may get some variety ... by Big+Jojo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having traveled in some tropical countries, one of the things I most remember about their fruits are the sheer NUMBER of different banana varieties. No monoculture. Your average roadside stand would have half a dozen varieties, and the one a mile down the road would have a few more. Tomorrow the mix would be different. And most of them would taste a lot better than the crap that's so widely available elsewhere!

    I for one will welcome our new polycultural bananalords.

    1. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by thermian · · Score: 1

      Us refined westerners apparently like our banana's to be within a very small range of size, coloration and shape.

      Apparently any banana that fails this test is unable to be sold, so we're forcing the restriction of types.

      Or at least, the buyers who choose this stuff are. I guess there is a fear of change, if a whole shipload of banana's isn't wanted when it arrives in port, heads would roll.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    2. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by value_added · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And most of them would taste a lot better than the crap that's so widely available elsewhere!

      I've done the same and I'll wholeheartedly agree. The only saving grace, at least for me, is that one can typically find plantain available in most supermarkets. Let them ripen (until black) in a paper bag, fry them, and add to a plate of black beans and rice with some Cuban-style coffee on the side, and Bob's (or maybe Fidel) yer uncle.

      As a side note, I do think the tendency for westerners to buy bananas out of habit is a disease. People have written essays and even books on why fruits and vetegables should be bought local, and then, only when in season. The idea of eating summer fruits when there's snow on the ground might be novel, but hardly appropriate, or interesting. Conversely, seeing a California supermarket in the middle of summer selling bananas (and their customers lining up to buy them) when just about every type of fruit is ripe for the picking is, well, no less than absurd.

      Me, I typically shop at farmer's markets, but that doesn't preclude me from noticing that the increasing reliance by the general public on cheap third-world produce (Walmart for the dinner table!) can and does have unfortunate side effects.

    3. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a side note, I do think the tendency for westerners to buy bananas out of habit is a disease. People have written essays and even books on why fruits and vetegables should be bought local, and then, only when in season.
      Strange that, I do think the tendency for westerners to tell people how to live is a far more virulent disease.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    4. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by bgat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea of eating summer fruits when there's snow on the ground might be novel, but hardly appropriate, or interesting. I'll grant you the "novel" and "interesting" parts, but not "appropriate". I don't see the point in limiting variety in my diet, particularly in the midwestern USA in the wintertime--- when the only locally-grown produce is snow!

      I hate a produce monoculture as much as the next guy, and I've even owned shares in a few local farmer's co-ops (and yes, their food does taste better when in season). But I'll take that along with my summer-fruits-in-wintertime disease anytime!
      --
      b.g.
    5. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by bgat · · Score: 1

      Strange that, I do think the tendency for westerners to tell people how to live is a far more virulent disease. Ditto.
      --
      b.g.
    6. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by ph0rk · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, for most major metropolitan areas, there just isn't enough land to grow enough "local fruit" to feed everyone, even assuming the ridiculously low amounts of fresh fruit many people eat - unless the next state over counts as local.

      Local fruit (and other foods) is a good thing, but the population density problem would need to be solved before a good 1/2 of the US population could take part.

      --
      semantics are everything!
    7. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      That's because us "refined" westerners need an education. Our foodstuffs are getting so artificial, so pre-processed, that we are missing out on the flavours, textures, scents, and varieties that are available to the rest of the world. Until today, I thought there were only bananas, and plantain. Now I know that there are many varieties of banana, just like there are many varieties of apple.

      Now, if I only liked bananas...

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by value_added · · Score: 0, Troll

      Strange that, I do think the tendency for westerners to tell people how to live is a far more virulent disease.

      If by "westerners" you're referring to the marketing and distribution juggernauts of the food industry, then yes, I agree.

      When it comes to food, there's only one rule to follow, and that's to eat and drink according to what you desire. Ask any dog (or, for that matter, any animal) and you'll hear the same answer.

      If you can't tell that peaches are yummiest when it's blazing hot outside and they're ready to be picked, or that when there's snow on the ground, stews and root vegetables are preferrable to peaches, I can't help you. The same goes if all you know is bananas and more bananas, or that your taste buds are so jaded that everything has to taste a certain way or have that certain je ne sais quoi of corn syrup to be edible.

      Or does it take a medical school degree to see the relationship between seasonal tastes and desires to seasonal nutritional needs?

      Then again, maybe the ideas of fresh-picked, or supporting your local farmer, are too quaint a notion in a world where agribusiness and one-stop shopping is the norm. If it is, then why the hell am I forced to support the billion dollar California avocado industry that drains water from the Colorado river, instead of just buying them from Mexico, where they've been growing them longer than anyone remembers?

    9. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I get you're constantly telling your friends about how you don't buy grocery store fruit, aren't you?

    10. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Caboosian · · Score: 1

      So you're saying I should travel to a second location, potentially miles away, for one item? Sorry, but with gas as expensive as it is, I'll take the mediocre, less healthy (but still tasty) banana over the one that costs additional gas money.

      If there was a farmer's market near the grocery store, you bet I'd be there. Unfortunately, there isn't, and I can't afford to travel so far for so little.

    11. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhh, tropical fruit have no 'seasons'. Also, what is wrong about importing fruit from the southern hemisphere? Given that most of the southern hemisphere is water and most people live on the northern land mass, supplying food out of season to the north is a major and lucrative source of income to the southern countries.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    12. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a side note, I do think the tendency for westerners to buy bananas out of habit is a disease. Why is it a disease? I like bananas. Why should I not eat bananas? I understand that you want everyone to live according to your standards and morality, but really, why should I not eat bananas?

      People have written essays and even books on why fruits and vetegables should be bought local, and then, only when in season. The idea of eating summer fruits when there's snow on the ground might be novel, but hardly appropriate, or interesting. This is absolutely bonkers. My wife's family lives in Wisconsin. You want them to survive on local produce over the winter? You want them to hoard dry goods so they can eat 6 months out of the year? Not to mention the exciting selection of nutritional deficits that most of the world suffered from before cheap year round fresh food selections. Really, this type of judgmental viewpoint bothers me so much. I really see your "EAT THIS WAY OR YOU HAVE A DISEASE!" moralism as no different from right wingers who think homosexuality is a disease.

      Conversely, seeing a California supermarket in the middle of summer selling bananas (and their customers lining up to buy them) when just about every type of fruit is ripe for the picking is, well, no less than absurd. Are you just making this up as you go along? Watching people "line up" for bananas in a supermarket? Food scarcity hasn't exactly been a problem in America in a number of years, I would be very interested in where you've seen people "line up" to get bananas, while bypassing all other fruits.

      Me, I typically shop at farmer's markets, Good for you! We should all be more like you, thanks for holding yourself out there as an example of the Right Way to live!
    13. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      As a side note, I do think the tendency for westerners to buy bananas out of habit is a disease. People have written essays and even books on why fruits and vetegables should be bought local, and then, only when in season. Personally, I think that those of us in colder climates should try to replace our bananas with something like pawpaws whenever possible, but people are such culinary cowards that there's not much of a market for 'new' fruit.
    14. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by TravisO · · Score: 1

      I live in New York, the weather is unsuitable for crops to grow for like 6 months of the year, what are we suppose to harvest locally, icicles??!?!

      I applaud your cause for "support local farmers" but you can support them for 4-6 months a year and still morally purchase your fruit at Walmart the rest of the year.

      Sorry, but I don't want to survive on salted meats, we don't live in the 1800s anymore.

    15. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by thermian · · Score: 1

      I understand this well. I came to England from Australia many moons ago, and was horrified (yes, literally) to discover what passed for fruit here.

      What gets marked as a large Melon here is shockingly small, and as for oranges, holy crap.
      A visit to the US a couple of years ago at least showed me that they don't suffer from this as badly as brits do.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    16. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      In general, I'm all for importing stuff from where it is grown in the most cost-efficient way. For food stuff, that mostly means anywhere but the US. However, fuel costs are enormous for food importation. As a result, where I can, I get food from the local farmers market, where transportation is a small truck from the field to the market.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    17. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Yath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People have written essays and even books on how they were given rides by little gray aliens.

      Who are you to decide what's "appropriate"? Wow, people buying fruits they enjoy annoys you? Maybe you should mind your own business. It isn't "interesting"?! WTF? Who modded this tripe up?

      Me, I typically shop at farmer's markets, but that doesn't preclude me from noticing that the increasing reliance by the general public on cheap third-world produce (Walmart for the dinner table!) can and does have unfortunate side effects.


      You mean like creating additional markets for those third-world growers to sell their goods in? God forbid they should try to increase their standards of living!
      --
      I always mod up spelling trolls.
    18. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cavendish is also one of the few varities hardy enough to withstand shipping from long distances. Others either damage easily or ripen too quickly for importation.

    19. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by tfoss · · Score: 1

      Ask any dog (or, for that matter, any animal) and you'll hear the same answer. Funny, my dog only said 'woof,' and then started licking himself.

      -Ted
      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    20. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by CodeMunch · · Score: 1

      People have written essays and even books on why fruits and vetegables should be bought local, and then, only when in season.

      yeah, because apples & cherries & oranges absolutely flourish in 6 feet of snow when the sun rises at 9AM and sets by 5PM...they TOTALLY love that.

      Where I'm from we only have 2 seasons: winter, and that brief period of bad snowmobiling.

      selfish hippy douche nozzles. Just because they can write, doesn't make them right.

    21. Re:Finally we may get some variety ... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Limiting what you eat is like being a foodie luddite. You're denying yourself the riches and pleasures of the foods now available. Instead you should consider compromising. It's OK to have a Prius for a car while you ride your bicycle where you can. It's OK to buy and enjoy avocados even if they come from San Diego, Florida, and Mexico and get shipped to New York.

  21. I for one... by mrbluze · · Score: 2, Funny

    more genetic variation means more resistance to the weakness of monoculture Well I for one will be the first to welcome our new superior-banana-being overlords, if they ever happen to evolve.
    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  22. What will happen to the dancing banana? by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    What other animated emoticon can I use to signal that I have an erection?

    1. Re:What will happen to the dancing banana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is that what that emoticon means? I always thought it meant that the person posting it was a jackass.

    2. Re:What will happen to the dancing banana? by randyest · · Score: 1

      I think it's both.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:What will happen to the dancing banana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two swinging coconuts.

  23. Gros Michel? by lysse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is anyone else wondering what exactly it was about this Big Michael guy that caused someone to name a large and tasty banana after him...?

    1. Re:Gros Michel? by griefers · · Score: 1

      Or they were ripping on him by calling him fat.

    2. Re:Gros Michel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've grown New Mexican variety chiles that were as long as nine inches. The cultivar was "Big Jim".

      Oh yeah? Well you can go to Hell...

  24. someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone needs to create a bananalord and/or banana scientist tag for this. especially if we're likely to get more of these articles as the panamanian's banana genocide continues.

  25. Yes... by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 1

    we have.. no.. bananas.....

  26. Read more carefully by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Snopes basically said the exact same thing. The cavendish bananna will be extinct. Snopes is playing semantics by saying that all bananas won't be effected, but the only one eaten by americans is the cavendish, so yes, the bananna as we know it will be extinct. Just like the bananna your grandparents knew is already extinct.


    Read more carefully. There's more than that in there.

    The fungus discussed here grows in the earth, and spreads through earth. In fact, it is a problem _because_ it's in the ground, so you can't just spray the leaves with some fungicide.

    So the only way this fungus could make the jump across the ocean to Latin America is either by

    A) someone bringing an infected plant and planting it in the middle of a plantation, or

    B) someone bringing a sack of infected earth and dumping it in a plantation. That's it, really.

    And the cultivars _are_ aware of the threat, so they:

    A) don't import any plants, but only clone plants which are known to be healthy. (They actually check, yes.) And

    B) don't import soil from anywhere. And apparently the countries which depend on bananas for their economy, have special customs regulations to forbid exactly that.

    Just about the only realistic scenario I can think of where that jump could happen, is, basically, an act of terror or sabotage. I.e., someone deliberately bringing some infected soil and spreading it around in Latin America. It could happen, I guess, but it's hardly something that the cultivars can do much about in advance.

    At any rate, that's the failure point of the "OMG, it's spreading exponentially" scare. It can spread all it want somewhere else, as long as it can't cross the ocean by itself, it's even less of a threat to the Latin American plantation than Al Qaeda deciding to crash an airplane into a plantation.
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Read more carefully by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      an act of terror or sabotage.

      Terror?

      I don't think you really mean that, or if you do, then you're quite wrong.

      Anyway, mi plantain's fine, so fi no way!

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    2. Re:Read more carefully by IkeTo · · Score: 4, Informative

      > So the only way this fungus could make the jump across the ocean to Latin America is either by

      > A) someone bringing an infected plant and planting it in the middle of a plantation, or

      > B) someone bringing a sack of infected earth and dumping it in a plantation. That's it, really.

      I think it is much easier than that. The fungus spread by insects like aphid. All it takes is a single one left alone in a container to somehow land in anywhere close to plantation to begin the spread of the disease.

    3. Re:Read more carefully by God'sDuck · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or a bit of dirt in somebody's shoe after travelling, or on an imported potato, or...

      Easier done than said.

    4. Re:Read more carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THEY don't import soil, but I'm sure someone does.

    5. Re:Read more carefully by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Terror?

      I don't think you really mean that, or if you do, then you're quite wrong. And pray tell, why would he not mean that, or why would he be wrong if he did?

      Someone successfully sabotaging food production is IMMENSELY more terrifying than few brainwashed kids blowing up themselves and few other - or even few thousand other - people.

      For a rational person, it's one of the very few things that could actually warrant that label.
    6. Re:Read more carefully by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

      A better known example of what can happen when you build an economy on one cloned plant, is the Irish potato famine.
        One result was massive immigration to the US, permanently changing US demographics, giving us, among others, Ted Kennedy.
      The less biodiversity in a system, the less resistant it is to catastrophic failure. That's one reason market economies do better than centrally planned economies.

    7. Re:Read more carefully by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I think that the word you used is better: sabotage.

      Terrorism is when you use, well, terror to try achieving your goals.

      Loss of wheat or corn might qualify, but non-staple bananas? I don't know if I can buy that.

      It's weird to see the word "terrorism" lose meaning right in front of my eyes over time - I guess a sign that I'm getting old! A dude with a bag of dirt never would have qualified when I was a kid :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Read more carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one reason market economies do better than centrally planned economies. Exactly! We wouldn't be in this mess if banana trade was handled by proper capitalistic corporations instead of soviets and hippie communes!

    9. Re:Read more carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if they crash an airplane filled with evil banana-killing soil? It would be the worst case of banana-based terrorism in history!

    10. Re:Read more carefully by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Even corn or wheat wouldn't qualify. Terrorism is a psychological attack. You kill or maim a few people (or just threaten to), preferably in a very graphic and public way, in order to terrorize a lot of other people.

      Dumping some dirt on a plantation, or infecting some wheat is not public, graphic or likely to inspire fear in the general populace. I could be a biological warfare attack, but terrorism it ain't.

    11. Re:Read more carefully by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I say we just give up the good fight an invent a new word. Horrorism? Atrocitism? Deathism? The media pays good people to invent these things.

      I like Deathocide. Wrong on so many levels.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Read more carefully by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      You are serious? I was going to propose to shot down those damn migrating flying bananas before they land to breed across the ocean, to stop the plague.

    13. Re:Read more carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If i could, i would mod you up--as your statement is nearly identical to what i was planning to say.

    14. Re:Read more carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fungus....reproduces by spores. You don't need a bag of dirt. All it would take is a dirty shoe with a couple of microscopic spores on it.

    15. Re:Read more carefully by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Just about the only realistic scenario I can think of where that jump could happen, is, basically, an act of terror or sabotage. I.e., someone deliberately bringing some infected soil and spreading it around in Latin America. It could happen, I guess, but it's hardly something that the cultivars can do much about in advance.

      I see another method, by getting your shoes dirty.

      Falcon
    16. Re:Read more carefully by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      A better known example of what can happen when you build an economy on one cloned plant, is the Irish potato famine.
      One result was massive immigration to the US, permanently changing US demographics, giving us, among others, Ted Kennedy.
      The less biodiversity in a system, the less resistant it is to catastrophic failure. That's one reason market economies do better than centrally planned economies.

      Lack of biodiversity may be why the Irish Potato Famine happened, potatoes are native to the US. The potatoes grown in Ireland may of been from a small number of parent plants transplanted.

      Falcon
  27. overbred by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Bananas are so overbred and 'engineered' that they have to be manually propagated, since they no longer produce seeds (taste bad). How is this sort of thing a surprise then ?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:overbred by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      manually propagated is a bit of a stretch.... they will send out runners of their own, but if you hack one down they send out more. basically if they think they are dying they try to replicate. It isn't like they are in a lab with a bunch of DNA and proteins and pour it into a clone-hatcher 3000 or something.

      --
      Get a web developer
  28. Please by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Won't somebody think of Charlie?

  29. Another "Ant" submission...now to Slashdot by sgant · · Score: 2

    I'm convinced that "Ant" doesn't have a job. Not only does he submit stories here, but also to Blues News EVERY day, also to VideoSift and other sites not to mention his own.

    So not only does he have to go out and actually find these stories to submit to all these different sites, he has to take the time to write a submission. And I don't think he's getting compensated for it...I mean, how would he?

    Would love to know the story behind "Ant".

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Another "Ant" submission...now to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *looks at your user name*

      I, good sir, am no fool!

      *wink*

  30. One word? by RossumsChild · · Score: 5, Funny

    Technically, that was worth a thousand words.

    1. Re:One word? by tgd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Technically that was worth 18526 words, 37052 bytes, 74104 nybbles, or 296416 bits.

    2. Re:One word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're still using a 16-bit CPU in this day and age?? I feel sorry for you.

    3. Re:One word? by X_Bones · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's that in Libraries of Congress?

    4. Re:One word? by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      Handy Libraries of Congress conversion chart

      1 picture = 37052 words

      1 library of congress = 28 million books = 2 ^ 42.6 bytes = 6.208375 Terabytes

      The picture is that worth 5.558195779 x 10-9 libraries of congress

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  31. a "banana scientist" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know that there is a professional designation called "banana scientist". Guess I missed that field of study/major in the course catalogs at college.

  32. There's one problem by Siener · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unfortunately none of those dozens of varieties have the attributes that make the Cavendish banana by far the most successful and important fruit crop in the world:

    1. Long shelf life
    2. Very uniform and predictable ripening times

    That is why you can get bananas cheaply, even though they might be grown thousands of miles from where they are eventually sold.

    Most, if not all the other varieties are only viable crops when they are sold very close to where they were grown.

    1. Re:There's one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long shelf life? 3 days is long shelf life?

      The bananas are picked too early, and are gassed half to death before they reach the supermarket so that they supposedly 'ripen' along the way.

      In the Caribbean, a banana can last 10 days unless you're in a house of hungry people. And STILL make better banana bread when it's a l'il off.

    2. Re:There's one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most, if not all the other varieties are only viable crops when they are sold very close to where they were grown.

      Definitely, Definitely not all.

      I'm a few dozen miles from the Canadian border, and my grocery store carries half a dozen different varieties of bananas regularly. We aren't anywhere close to where bananas are grown.

    3. Re:There's one problem by the+idoru · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the Cavendish is very fragile and ripens rather quickly. However, there is currently a tremendous amount of infrastructure dedicated to "babying" the Cavendish in order to make it viable. For example, lots of refrigerated transport and storage (read: expensive). But the Cavendish keeps working because the process is in place. It's cheaper to keep it working than switch to a different species with different needs.

      The success of the Cavendish is not because it's inherently resilient but because a tremendous amount of effort was put into making it work.

  33. WWII situation by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

    maybe sometime in the future we'll end up back in the situation of WWII rationing where a lot of children didn't even know what a banana looked like.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  34. There are many kinds of bananas by mangu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    more genetic variation means more resistance to the weakness of monoculture

    I live in Brazil where there are many types of bananas available. Any supermarket has at least three different types. Just off my head, I can name at least six types of Brazilian bananas: Ouro ("gold"), Prata ("silver"), d'Agua ("water"), Maçã ("apple"), Nanica ("dwarf"), da Terra ("earth").
    1. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by beadfulthings · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Somebody with points should mod your post up as "interesting." I lived in the Far East when I was a child and remember the same thing--at least three readily available bananas with different characteristics--one yellow, one that was green in color even when ripe, and one that was reddish, kind of small, and intensely sweet.

      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    2. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by sortius_nod · · Score: 0

      I live in Brazil where there are many types of bananas available. Any supermarket has at least three different types. Just off my head, I can name at least six types of Brazilian bananas: Ouro ("gold"), Prata ("silver"), d'Agua ("water"), Maçã ("apple"), Nanica ("dwarf"), da Terra ("earth"). It was the same when I used to live in Tonga, colours of the rainbow in bananas. All tasting different and for different purposes.

      I suppose this is what happens when you move a staple into a niche of the market. Here in Australia we get a few different kinds, but nowhere near as many as I've seen throught the pacific and asia.

      Not sure, but I think our crops would be introduced species rather than native.
    3. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by mwanaheri · · Score: 3, Informative

      So true. If I remember correctly, Uganda has about 40 different kinds of banana. Not all of them are for eating, but still the variety is pretty big. Except for those which are for cooking, most bananas aren't as big as we are used to get them, but certainly more tasty.

      --
      Idha khatabahum lijahiluna qalu salaman
    4. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Like all fruits and vegetables there will always be varieties in different regions. However the problem are that these varieties may not have the qualities that banana companies need to supply average consumers. This is a problem I see with American supermarkets more than those in Asia or Europe. Your average big chain American supermarket all have pretty much the same vegetables varieties. Red Delicious Apples, Iceberg Lettuce, etc. While other banana varieties may be more colorful, in some ways tastier, what most banana companies need is a variety that can produce lots of bananas of a certain size that fruit within a relatively short time period. Taste is secondary. Quantity is more important. I suspect that the companies are looking for the next variety that will have these qualities.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by maxume · · Score: 2

      Any national chain worth its game in the US will now have a dozen plus varieties of bagged lettuce, and 3 or 4 for the picking. My supermarket usually has 8-10 varieties of bagged apples too. Go Fuji, down with Braeburn. Sure, they all have the same 8-10 varieties of Apples, but honestly, the big 5 varieties of Apples are so much more worth eating out of the hand that it actually makes sense.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      Its the same with all the fruit and veg.

      Like strawberries - the type you see most commonly in supermarkets was selected because it's consistent in size, fairly big and bright red. Taste doesn't come in to it. Actually the smaller strawberries tend to be sweeter and nicer, but they wouldn't look so good on a shelf, so we don't see them on shelves.

      All the "ugly" candidates in a box of food get the toss as well - lumpy potatoes, mis-shapen apples and etc. Although there was a thing at Tesco a while back where they sold the ugly ones off cheap, making a point out of them being ugly but it not really mattering...

      I think I'd prefer to see the full variety in shops. It'd be kinda cool to see all the different shapes and sizes and colours of banana you can get.

    7. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by metlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell me about it.

      Growing up in India, I remember all the different varieties and flavors - they came in pink, red, yellow, green, violet/purple etc, and in all shapes and size (ridiculously small ones to *huge* ones). And they all tasted very distinctly different from one another and were quite delicious.

      In the US, all fruits taste the same to me, and bananas are so flavorless that I've stopped eating them altogether.

      Hell, you even had varieties of plantains that could be used in several spicy dishes, and you used the stem of the banana tree in some dishes, as well. Hard to find anything outside of the mainstream here. And even if you do, it tends to taste hopelessly "factory made".

    8. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the most popular one (at least in norteastern Brazil): Pacovan.

    9. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Your average big chain American supermarket all have pretty much the same vegetables varieties. I've got to wonder if you've been in a supermarket within the past decade? What you say is absolutely not true in my experience ANYMORE. Whether it's local, organics, exotic imports, etc, groceries stores are a lot different than they were even 5 years ago. Just last week I was at a Harris Teeter and they had a big banana poster up featuring like 6-8 different types of bananas, explaining their flavor, how to eat, etc.
    10. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by rossdee · · Score: 1

      I agree about the strawberries, I haven't tasted a decent one in this country.
      Where I grew up we used to grow our own, and fresh strawberries (and pavlova) were a Christmas dinner tradition.

      Red delicious apples may look nice, but Braeburn (4103) taste way better. Royal Gala are nicer than Braeburn, but my favourite apple was the Pacific Rose.

    11. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Decent grocery stores have multiple types of bananas in North America too. There are the typical yellow ones, you can usually find some plantains, and every so often they'll have the little red ones too.

      Even Safeway manages to stock plantains some of the time!

    12. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by RealErmine · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I remember correctly, Uganda has about 40 different kinds of banana. Not all of them are for eating... Indeed, some are for dueling.
      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    13. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      It's not that supermarkets don't offer other varieties. It's that most supermarkets have the same ones so produce growers have to mass produce these varieties. Take apples for instance. There are gads of different ones. Recently I've noticed that Braeburns and Fujis are starting to make some headway but the every supermarket, grocery store, convenience store carries Red Delicious.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    14. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Laxitive · · Score: 1


      I grew up in Tamil Nadu.. close to the Kerala border (my family speaks a local dialect of Tamil mixed with Malayalam) and I just wanted to come in and nod my sad head at this fact.

      I remember at least 6 types of bananas directly. My favourites were the little tiny ones (like 3 inches long, yellow, and fat).

      Even discounting the bananas, there are dozens and dozens of fruit that I haven't had in years, and I miss dearly.

      Wandering around as 8-year old in my grandparents mango groves, picking ripe mangos straight from the tree, dried sap still fragrant on their skin, biting into it and scraping the flesh off the skin with my teeth.. that was pure fucking heaven.

      You saw where EVERYTHING you ate came from. I'd go play out on the beach and watch the fisherfolk bring in their catch on their tiny boats. Dragging their nets flopping full of fish back onto the beach from their boats. There'd be kids running around playing with the fish (myself included).

      The butchers we went to for mutton was a shack on the side of the street, fresh cuts of meat lying bleeding out in the open. If a cut wasn't available, they'd get a goat out from behind the shed and slaughter it right there.

      One sad things about north america is how the people in general are so profoundly disconnected from their food - particularly urbanites (I'm no different, I get my veggies and meat at the supermarket too). I think it makes a big difference in how you feel about your food, and how you treat your food habits. The few places where it's preserved on this content are on the ranches and farms - but that culture is slowly dying out.

      So it goes.

      By the way, it's still possible to find some good fruit in north america, you just have to change your fruit. Apples in India (esp. south india) are shit. All the ones I ever had were mealy and nasty. You get a superb apple selection in most supermarkets, from tart to sweet to crisp to fleshy. If you are attentive, you can find really nice quality: apples, pears, pineapple, oranges, grapes, plums, melons (canteloups to watermelon). Some of the melons are really hit and miss - sometimes it's shit sometimes its awesome.. I haven't been able to figure out how to tell if a melon is sweet before I buy it.

      Sure, it's not nearly as good as back in kerala and TN, but it's better than nothing.

    15. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by spacey · · Score: 1

      Bananna de Terra, at least, are more commonly seen in the states as Plantains, but I think the important point is that there isn't a great deal of genetic difference between those varieties you've listed. If the sweet banana is vulnerable, then all the others are as well.

      My very limited understanding is that Bananas are originally from an area in India where the native jungle is disappearing so the chance of pulling out an actually genetically different banana from anywhere else is quite small, though there are native crops elsewhere according to wikipedia (australia, in fact). But that's probably not enough to qualify as true diversity.

      -Peter

      --
      == Just my opinion(s)
    16. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 5, Funny

      From what I can tell from watching my wife buy melons and tasting the result, the technique is to hit them with the flat of your hand, listen to the sound they make, and then after doing this to about a dozen, choose one completely at random and hope for the best.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    17. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 1

      There's usually one weekend in May where the grocery store strawberries in some US regions are decent. If you're lucky you'll catch a radio ad about "strawberries being in season".

      Any other time of the year and they're usually mostly green to white to off-white pink, unpleasantly tart (even bitter) and distinctly non-juicy. I grew up helping my grandma harvest strawberries from her garden so I'm admittedly a touch spoiled.

      --
      Life would be easier if I had the source code.
    18. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Kamineko · · Score: 1
      Awesome, awesome names.


      I will be seek these bananas, and I will gain their elemental magic powers!


      When I have all six, the world will be MINE!

    19. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by lilomar · · Score: 1

      You can grow your own here (I assume by "here" you mean the US) too if you live in the right zone.

      And they are much tastier than the big ones you get in stores.

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    20. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by el_gordo101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While what you say is true as far as the big supermarket chains carrying a much better variety of produce, these "exotic" varieties sell in much smaller numbers. I was a produce department manager for a large chain in the Northeast for several years and I can tell you that 99.99% of the bananas we sold were the plain old Cavendish variety. We would average around 600 pounds of Cavendish a day compared to around 10 pounds a week of the other varieties combined. Cavendish bananas were our #1 selling fruit item, hands down. The chains love the Cavendish because it can be harvested green, shipped long distances by boat, and stored for (fairly) long periods. When it was time to ship to the store, they would flood the storerooms at the warehouse with ethylene gas to kick-start the ripening process, ensuring that there would be some yellow-ish bananas on the shelf.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    21. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by shilly · · Score: 1

      I realise that YMMV, but I find it staggering that you can honestly think that the most commonly eaten apples are so much more worth eating. The flavour of a Braeburn is incomparably inferior to an Egremont Russett, which I doubt it commonly sold in most supermarkets, but is a reasonably large commercial brand all the same. And there are much finer and rarer apple varieties available, such as Ashmead's Kernel. http://www.orchard-group.uklinux.net/glos/apples/Ashmead's+Kernel.html

    22. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to this problem is as plantain as the nose on my face

    23. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I live in Brazil where there are many types of bananas available.
      The problem for those living in wealthy western countries is to find a variety that ripens at a suitable rate, is robust enough for transport, etc..
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    24. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hard to find the cavendish (just "banana" here) and plantains (african, also common in the caribbean) in most supermarkets in the USA. Dwarf bananas are also extremely common, and as for "de terra", I suspect that'd be red bananas. I can't think of anything that matches the other varieties.

      No, you might not find them in the Krogers in the middle of the projects, but you don't exactly have to go to Whole Foods to find the other common varieties either.

    25. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yes, Braeburn are awful. I mostly eat Fuji, because of the great shelf life. They don't go bad for ages.

      I'm sure that there are tastier apples available much of the year, but lots of them aren't going to stand up to shipping and so forth, so I don't hold it against my supermarket that they "only" have 8 varieties of apples year round. A lot of the varieties that get grown around here are not superior hand apples (but some are great for pies, or apple sauce, and so on) to the Red Delicious, Golden Delicious and Fuji.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    26. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Danse · · Score: 1

      I haven't been able to figure out how to tell if a melon is sweet before I buy it. I've gotten pretty good at picking sweet melons out of the bunch. I do it mostly by smell, but color and texture play a part as well. A ripe sweet honeydew melon has a distinctive sweet scent. It may or may not be slightly more yellow than an unripe one, but be careful buying one if it's especially yellow-ish. It may be overripe. Ripe ones tend to have slightly softer skin too. Cantaloupe is harder to tell by scent, but can be done that way as well. If you have a ripe and unripe one to compare against each other, you can tell pretty easily.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    27. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Red delicious apples are just horrible. They taste bad, the skin is thick and nasty, and they are misshapen.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    28. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I really don't understand why Red Delicious are even sold anymore. I know of no one who likes them. They don't taste that good. The flesh is gritty and mealy. The skin is thick and bitter. They look funny. And when you bake 'em, they fall apart. There's just *nothing* good about them.

    29. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Cantaloupe is harder to tell by scent, but can be done that way as well. If you have a ripe and unripe one to compare against each other, you can tell pretty easily.

      With cantaloupe you can also tell by color. Look inside the gaps of the reticulated skin: green are unripe and light brown are ripe. It should also be fairly firm, but a tiny bit of softness doesn't hurt. It should be softer at the stem end.

      I've also read that it's easier to pick up the scent at the stem end.
      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    30. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about pointed sticks?

    31. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by lartful_dodger · · Score: 1

      I've learned to pick the best apples - a solid tap with the flat of your finger should give you a high pitched sound, the floury, nastier apples will sound lower.
      Peaches, mangoes, melons - you should always smell them, though the percussive technique is usually a good melon indicator too. You're looking for more resonant, though, from a melon, rather than higher pitched.

      --
      The face of 'evil' is always the face of total need
    32. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by tengu1sd · · Score: 1
      >>> Depends on the melon.

      Watermelon, honeydew other hard skinned, slap and pray. I buy cantelope based on smell and color. All green pass, turning orange/yellow and smells like food, grab it. Sometimes I buy before it's ripe and that's an issue. The local stuff will ripen on the counter, the shipped melons will rot before turning ripe. No way to tell which is which.

    33. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Zalminen · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the famed Ugandan battle banana.

      Many raiding warbands have foolishly underestimated the banana-armed local troops. They soon learned otherwise; a trained bananist can decapitate the target with a well-aimed throw...

    34. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      My very limited understanding is that Bananas are originally from an area in India where the native jungle is disappearing

      The Banana is native to Southeast Asia and Australia not just India. According to Botany 2004 bananas were "first cultivated in the Mediterranean region ca. 650 A.D". However some botanists believe bananas once grew in Oregon.

      Falcon
    35. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      You can grow your own here (I assume by "here" you mean the US) too if you live in the right zone.

      Except maybe Alaska or Hawaii I don't know of any state in the US where strawberries won't grow. Well, maybe Arizona, New Mexico, and or Utah. I'm growing some in my garden and I live in Minneapolis, the state shares a border with Canada. And in Plant City, Florida, they have their annual Strawberry Festival. Ah, it's been too long since I went there.

      Falcon
    36. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Although there was a thing at Tesco a while back where they sold the ugly ones off cheap, making a point out of them being ugly but it not really mattering...
      Afaict most supermarkets have a value range where the aim is to provide the produce as cheaply as possible without worrying too much about what it looks like.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    37. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by drew · · Score: 1

      The first house I lived in had about 30 apple trees on the property. I believe they were Red Delicious or something similar, but I can't remember for sure; it was well over 20 years ago now that I lived there, and I was pretty young at the time. But I do still remember how much better those were than any apple you can buy in a store. I ate apples all the time as a kid, and I still like them, but about the only ones that I am willing to buy at the grocery store are granny smith. They are about the only ones that are crisp enough for me to enjoy eating. Occasionally I'll buy Gala apples, but even those seem to be hit or miss.

      I am pretty sure that almost all produce grown on a large scale for sale in American supermarkets is grown for consistency and attractiveness over any other feature. Personally, I consider that to be a more valid reason to buy organic produce than any of the concerns about chemical fertilizers. Organic produce (at least organic fruits) tend to be much more flavorful than their non-organic brethren even if they don't look nearly as attractive.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    38. Re:There are many kinds of bananas by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Very interesting information. Thanks for the reply!

  35. the last episode by Fluorophore · · Score: 1

    I saw this episode of Bananas in Pyjamas. Very sad.

    --
    --- I am NaN, I am a free man!
  36. Alaska Science Forum by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Alaska Science Forum did an article on this problem back in 1990. Unfortunately I haven't found the promised followup. This contains a lot more information than the wikipedia articles.

    Basically it involves information on why the bananas are hard to breed for a better strain. (they have no seeds) The Honduras Foundation for Agricultural Research has found way of crossbreeding in wild strains to produce seeds. Looks like it's slow going, but genetic mutation is pretty much the only way to engineer in resistance to new disease, and that will require seeds, not cuttings.

    I wasn't able to find any updates on the HFAR's progress. Anyone else have any luck?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  37. How dare you.... by kyriosdelis · · Score: 1

    The banana we eat today is not the one your grandparents ate. I believe in ID, you insensitive clod!
    --
    I don't mind dating a girl that has been with everybody, as long as she had a good shower afterwards.
    1. Re:How dare you.... by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Creationists believe in speciation (the type of "evolution" that Darwin observed). Just not that everything came from primordial soup (the type of "evolution" that nobody has observed).

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:How dare you.... by _LORAX_ · · Score: 1

      Actually that is abiogenesis not evolution, so take your strawman somewhere else.

  38. price hikes..... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Knowing this will obviously lead to price hikes for bananas, which contains potassium that helps hold off mussel cramps caused by anti-cholesterol meds, taken by millions....

    Anyway, what can I do to give cause for a price hike in my salary, so to afford all these other price hikes?

    Its not a matter of inflation which is always going to happen given the game it is, but rather a matter of at which end of the inflation spectrum are you positioned at. The side they gives you a financial advantage or the larger side that gives you a disadvantage.

    1. Re:price hikes..... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      which contains potassium that helps hold off mussel cramps caused by anti-cholesterol meds, taken by millions....

      Since I dont eat shellfish I will not experience these "mussel cramps".

      Wouldn't it be smarter for those on that medication to simply stop eating mussel's? I mean come on, the things really are not that tasty.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:price hikes..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be smarter for those on that medication to simply stop eating mussel's? Fail.
    3. Re:price hikes..... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be smarter for those on that medication to simply stop eating mussel's? I mean come on, the things really are not that tasty.

      Well, the OP had it wrong anyway. Cholesterol lowering medications (statins) don't lower cholesterol. He's probably thinking of diuretics that lower blood pressure.

      Keep on chomping through those invertebrates.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  39. Your last chance! by StarfishOne · · Score: 1, Insightful


    This is your last chance to start Gorillas.bas and play it like we used to!

    (For the younger people among us:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorillas_(computer_game) )

    1. Re:Your last chance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me bows down to StarfishOne

      I haven't seen this game in at least 15 years, but boy was it fantastic.

    2. Re:Your last chance! by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      No need to bow for we are from the same generation.

      The generation that learned how to handle MS-DOS and QBasic and survived to tell the tale. ;)

      All these young whipper snappers with them fancy GPUs. ;D

      I'm starting to feel old at 27, ouch. ;p

  40. Re:Oh noes! by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny

    Slow news day? I think any story about a major threat to our food supply to be a major one, plus it mentions "Banana Scientists"! What is there not to love? Not to mention that bananas wouldn't go extinct if they'd had a space program ! How much more technical can you get ?
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  41. Re:Oh noes! by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    I bet news about the MTV awards gets more coverage than the banana extinction does.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  42. Maybe GM is the answer by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    I would be more than happy to eat a GM banana, sure hippies might complain but they can just switch to eating flavored turnip like people in the UK did during the war.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Maybe GM is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your shitty GM solution is why I have super weeds in my yard that act like I'm using miracle grow when I hit them with roundup.

    2. Re:Maybe GM is the answer by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      His GM solution is also why you have roundup, so quit bitching and get a shovel. (Or use a more traditional herbicide, or wait until Monsanto re-formulates it again, again.)

      As an aside, am I the only person who gets annoyed by the mis-appropriation of the word "organic" by the natural food industry? It's ridiculous that chemists have to start referring to their carbon-based molecules as "synthetic organic" just because a bunch of clueless hippies didn't know what they were talking about and a multi-million dollar marketing machine tricked self-conscious people into using it.

    3. Re:Maybe GM is the answer by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      As an aside, am I the only person who gets annoyed by the mis-appropriation of the word "organic" by the natural food industry? I got over it really, really fast. The fact that people equate "chemicals" to "bad" even though they are made from chemicals got me primed for other abuses of scientific terminology.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Maybe GM is the answer by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Unless your "weeds" are actually some sort of food crop, I call BS.
      Plants don't just randomly pick up genes from unrelated species.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  43. Re:Oh noes! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why? because this news is OVER 3 months old. I heard it on NPR "science friday" back in Late April early May! it has been covered heavily in all the earth science and microbiological journals for nearly 3 months now and yes those have covered how it's spreading even faster.

    It's like Slashdot waiting until the end of the month to announce, "Mars polar lander made it to the ground and is sending pictures!"

    So yes, it's a slow news day as it's a rehash of old news that has had wide coverage.

    Next up, The MIR space station is going to be decommissioned, and spacelab will fall from the sky.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  44. I just couldnt help it... by denton420 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "There is no cure, and nearly every banana scientist says..."

    Anyone else burst out laughing after reading the title of banana scientist? This picture came to mind...

    http://www.zenbutoh.com/charactergallery/images/gorilla-bananas.jpg

  45. Fruit considered dangerous by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Fruit is really not so healthy as people have been lead to believe. It is mostly water, sugar, vit C and (some) antioxidants.

    Vit C, the original reason for pushing fruit, has proven to be all hype; you only need a small amount to get all the benefit. Except in marathon runners it doesn't help colds.

    Sugar is bad news: feeds bacterias and fructose uses up the bodies store of magnesium (which is bad, bad, bad). Modern fruits are large and super-sweet, nothing like what our hunter-gatherer ancestors consumed, and were also generally restricted by season. Eat a crab apple or an ornamental Chinese citrus fruit to see what natural fruit is really like. 12,000 years ago figs were almost 1/6 the size. 3 million years of hunter evolution has yet to catch up with our modern industrial diet of sugar, grains, vegetables oils and marge.

    And the jury is out on antioxidants as studies are contradictory.

    Bananas offer potassium, but there are healthier ways to get that.

    Keep to the semi-sweet fruits, such as cranberries, grapefruit, strawberries, blueberries etc

    1. Re:Fruit considered dangerous by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Fruit is really not so healthy as people have been lead to believe. It is mostly water, sugar, vit C and (some) antioxidants. If you believe every piece of healthy eating hype that's ever published, I reckon you'd starve to death in under 6 months.

      We've had red meat and butter (saturated fat), poultry (salmonella), eggs (again, salmonella), oily fish (mercury), non-oily fish (overfished to the point of extinction in some areas), margarine (hydrogenated fat), non-organic food (toxic pesticides), water (female sex hormones reducing sperm count), genetically modified food (we don't actually know what the problem is yet, but we are afraid it may be worse than anything seen before). And that's just off the top of my head.
    2. Re:Fruit considered dangerous by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Meat and saturated fat were linked to heart disease which is now considered non-causative: contributory only. Only highly processed meats are still linked to cancers. Red meat is linked to male infertility but only because of beef hormone usage.

      Salmonella infects 1 in 20,000 eggs, and generally only if the shell is cracked. For years it was supposed to cause heart disease, onyl for the WHO to establish that the more you eat the longer you live.

      Margarine was supposed to be heart healthy and turned out to be the opposite.

      Same with vegetable oils, but which cause cancer in lab animals (triggering an attempt to industrially convert polyunsaturates to monounsaturated oils).

      I reckon there are two general rules: when is doubt do the opposite of what the experts tell you, and the second to establish what is anthropologically natural to us rather than chasing novel elixirs. After all, you can't be moderate or balanced with poisons (like margarine, a sort of plasticised oil).

    3. Re:Fruit considered dangerous by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 1

      And why is the parent flamebait? Must have been a fruit nazi.

    4. Re:Fruit considered dangerous by NewtonFan · · Score: 1

      Sounds interesting. Do you have some sources?

    5. Re:Fruit considered dangerous by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      Sigh...

      All that and you still missed the point. Should you have learned not to listen to "experts" or learned to be skeptical about where your information comes from, maybe to ask questions like "What motivations does this person have to lie to me, and thus how might they be likely to distort the truth?" Such skepticism is often useful in all aspects of life, but is especially so regarding economic issues, by which I mean, If someone is trying to sell you margarine, that in and of itself is sufficient reason to be skeptical of their statements and to do independent research yourself.

  46. Yes, we have no bananas by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I've got a lovely bunch of coconuts....

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  47. Do you want a banana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peel it down and go "Mmm, mmm, mmm, mmm"

  48. Ack. by Quinnie · · Score: 0

    The end of me having Kelloggs Crunchy Nut and banana for breakfast? Nooooo.

  49. The Atheist's Nightmare by agnosticanarch · · Score: 1

    If bananas are indeed "the atheist's nightmare" does this mean we can wake up now?

    I just had the scariest dream... and Kirk Cameron was there smiling about bananas! *shivers*

    And what's the moral of this story? The fungus evolved! Or maybe it was intelligently designed and just in hiding in an apple grove or behind some oranges!

    ~AA

    --
    I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
  50. Re:Oh noes! by dintech · · Score: 1

    Only if a disease wipes them all out too. Err, not that I would want something like that to happen to Justin Timberlake and co, you know...

  51. Popular Science article is better by iamstuffed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought the Popular Science article was much better: http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2005-06/can-fruit-be-saved

    1. Re:Popular Science article is better by iamstuffed · · Score: 1

      Ah, this article is written by the same person who wrote the Popular Science article in June 2005.

  52. Norman Borlaug vs. Enviroluddites by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    I bet the evil corporate banana growers will have a fungus-resistant modified banana out and growing shortly, while luddism and superstition regarding engineered bananas in Africa will kill millions.

    But they're darker and they sound funny, and they're really far away, so I guess they don't matter, except that it makes me glad that they are still living authentically squalid^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hreal lives.

  53. Bananas the World's 4th Largest Staple Crop by Starky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While this might not seem so serious to consumers in the U.S., in fact the banana family (including plantains) is the 4th largest food staple crop in the world (or at least it was several years ago when I was researching the banana industry for a litigation matter) behind wheat, rice, and corn.

    Food for thought.

    --
    -- My choice of computing platform is a symbol of my individuality and belief in personal freedom.
    1. Re:Bananas the World's 4th Largest Staple Crop by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      several years ago when I was researching the banana industry for a litigation matter
      That sounds like a gay euphemism from the 1950s.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  54. Re:Oh noes! by zifferent · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's older than that. I read about it in a magazine years ago. The smallish bananas that you see in the supermarket are part of an aggressive breeding program to get ahead of the disease.

    The truth is banana plants haven't been propagated by seed, and only recently (past five years) have there been attempts to find new cultivars, before the bottom falls out of the banana industry.

    --
    cat sig > /dev/null
  55. With apologies to by Sciryl+Llort · · Score: 1

    Yes we have no bananas
    - we have no bananas today!
    They've all been infected
    We're feelling dejected
    - they've all gone and rotted right away!
    Our culture's all so mono,
    they've all died out and gone-oh!
    So, yes we have no bananas!
    We have no bananas today

    1. Re:With apologies to by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

      DAY-O DAAAAY O, Daylight come and me wan go home
      Come Mr Tally Man Tally NO Banana.
      Daylight come and me wan go home.

  56. Banana Scientist? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, the correct term is 'Bananologist'!

    1. Re:Banana Scientist? by abigor · · Score: 1

      I think I'll pay a visit to my bananologer and see what my love life holds based on these old peels of mine.

    2. Re:Banana Scientist? by mrwolf007 · · Score: 1

      I dont care how you call them.
      Theyre just doing monkey buisiness anyway.

    3. Re:Banana Scientist? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

      Actually a "Bananologist" can only offer fruit therapy. A "Bananiachrist" can do everything a "Bananologist" can do, but can also prescribe little yellow pills.

      It's important to remember the difference, especially if you think you are going bananas.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  57. Holding off judgement by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm holding off judgment until I hear what Sharon Stone has to say about this!

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Holding off judgement by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Funny

      The bananas had it coming to them. Karma anyone? They've been spinning out karts for far too long.

  58. Re:Oh noes! by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 5, Informative

    But while I disagree about this being a major threat to our food supply (I think we should be fine even without bananas)

    If you RTFS then you will see that while 'we' in developed countries will be ok without bananas they make up a large part of the food supply for some people in Africa. This will likely have a massive effect on people who don't have the luxury to choose what they eat day to day.

  59. Probably by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    next to the Kentucky Jelly and just as tasty.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Probably by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for a +1 Innuendo mod point...

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  60. We will sing this little number again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a fruit store on our street,
    It's run by a Greek.
    And he keeps good things to eat
    But you should hear him speak.
    When you ask him anything
    He never answers "No."
    He just "Yesses" you to death,
    And as he takes your dough,
    He tells you:
    (chorus)
    YES! We have no bananas,
    We have no bananas today.
    We've string beans and HON-ions,
    Cab-BAH-ges and scallions
    And all kinds of fruit, and say
    We have an old fashioned to-MAH-to,
    Long Island po-TAH-to,
    But YES! We have no bananas.

  61. Re:Oh noes! by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... which would be preferable to bananas falling out of your bottom I suppose...

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  62. Fresh Air NPR Interview by jrivar59 · · Score: 1

    An oddly interesting interview that explains a lot about the banana.

  63. Implications for cloning in general by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Why is this story relevant to Slashdot? Because here at Slashdot, we like technology, and cloning is a fascinating cyberpunk-to-reality technology. The banana is a great low-tech example of what happens when your food crops are clones.

    This isn't the end of the world, I mean, there are other varieties which we can eventually breed into mass-commerce viable crops. Maybe we have no bananas for a few years while they plant new varieties... it could nuke the banana companies, but we can live without bananas for a few years, right?

    Yeah. But now imagine the same thing happens to cloned cattle, corn, rice, and wheat. The world can do without corn for a few years, right?

    Oh crap...

    1. Re:Implications for cloning in general by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why is this story relevant to Slashdot?

      I think you answered it yourself, but to make it perfectly clear....

      But now imagine the same thing happens to cloned cattle

      No cheezburger. Soy Burgers don't cut it.

      corn

      No Doritos. Although keyboards all of the world would rejoice, programming would never be the same

      rice

      No Rice Krispie Marshmallow treats.

      and wheat.

      No Cinnamon Rolls, No Twinkies, No Doughnuts.

      I think you get the idea now: The End of The World As We Know it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  64. This just in... by griefers · · Score: 1

    The price of cucumber futures soar due to fear that bananas will be off the market.

  65. Re:Oh noes! by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

    And where you have banana scientists, you are sure to find banana protectors!

    --
    blah blah blah
  66. Gros Michel? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Wow, imagine having a banana named after you. I bet Michel was popular with the ladies...

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  67. One Has to Wonder... by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    Why the Alaska Science Forum would be concerned even remotely with bananas? They appear to be waaaay ahead in global warming preparations. Either that or they've gone bananas.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  68. greenhouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have five banana plants in my greenhouse. Hopefully they are far enough away from the producing areas that they won't get infected. And ya, that's how you get new plants, they send out what are called "pups" from the mother plant, you separate them off once they are a few feet tall, pretty easy really, and that is why I have 5 of them now and not one.

  69. Re:Oh noes! by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Exactly, how does extinction / loss of a food supply / mutating desease which have earlier almost killed a whole industry become small news? I would more likely find it the biggest news this day on Slashdot, time will tell.

    I guess he just don't eat bananas. It'd make a relatively decent sci-fi channel film. A mutant banana virus taking over the world. Yeah... Sounds about right. Maybe even a HUGE mutant banana virus, the size of a large dog! With slime and goo oozing off it!
    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  70. Re:Oh noes! by DarenN · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, first of all, here's an article from 2003 that looks like it might have been on the money

    Second of all, most banana plants are grown from cuttings - without the reproduction mutations resistant to these fungal infections are simply not happening on any kind of scale. "The problem is that the banana we eat is a seedless, sterile article which could slip the way of its predecessor which was wiped out by blight half a century ago."

    They're sequencing the genome of the bananas eaten in africa (which HAVE seeds) but there are problems because people aren't interested in the GM varieties, saying they taste more like apple (no bad thing to me)

    --
    Rational thought is the only true freedom
  71. Re:Oh noes! by HeroreV · · Score: 1

    It might be (or have been) major news, but it's not technology related, and Slashdot is known for tech news.

  72. teh regular conspiracy theories come to mind by rootpassbird · · Score: 0

    give us oil or we rob you of bananas
    give us diamonds or we spread a banana-killer
    and so on...
    socio economic warfare that is not scandalous and is highly effective as a threatening weapon

    --
    Hackers have long memories. It works both ways.
  73. Re:Oh noes! by Malevolyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget making the bananas grow arms and legs, then rise up against humanity.

    I, for one, welcome our new yellow overlords.

    --
    Your ad here.
  74. Fat banana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe me, having a "fat banana" is no insult.

  75. Recent History: Paying off Terrorists by Arakageeta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Chiquita Brands International still isn't a "harmless" international company. The company was fined by the US Justice Department, to the tune of $25 million, for paying extortion fees to Colombian rebels between 1997 and 2004 (though the company has a history of doing this back to 1989). Granted, perhaps Chiquita was screwed if it did or screwed if it didn't-- I am not familiar with the details.

  76. Personally... by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

    ... I'm disappointed that this is the only /. article tagged with 'bananascientists'.

    1. Re:Personally... by TravisO · · Score: 1

      It's definitely a nominee for best tag of 2008

  77. Re:Oh noes! by thue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But the Africans do not use cloned copies of a single tree, which is what the Cavendish bananas are. So presumably only a part of the banana palms in Africa will be affected.

  78. Re:Yes by pjabardo · · Score: 1

    I though you have balls.

  79. geometrically quicker? by tenco · · Score: 1

    Does that mean growth \propto time^1?

  80. This is Slashdot. No bananas? No problem... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No Ramen Noodles? ZOMG ITS TEH END OF TEH WORLD!!!11ONE

    (Bunch of other words in lowercase to get around anti-funny caps filter)

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  81. Scientific American podcast by mdd4696 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a Scientific American podcast about the demise of the banana on April 23, 2008. It was interesting--they actually went down to South America and took a tour of a banana farm. There are some photos on the site as well.

    http://www.sciam.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=7BA7726C-EBE6-29DB-B21F7FF464B293E9

  82. grrrrrrr by OshMan · · Score: 1

    There goes all my work on banana based fuel!

  83. How is Microsoft to blame for this? by MarkvW · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nobody has explained yet how Microsoft is behind all of this. How did Bill Gates cause THIS problem?

  84. Re:Oh noes! by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

    Remember Attack of the killer Tomatoes?

    Cross that with the animation bananaphone from the weeble and bob guys :)

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  85. Re:Oh noes! by eap · · Score: 1

    Most people in areas where bananas can be grown probably don't eat Cavendish bananas. They would have access to the many other local varieties that are excellent food sources and resistant to this disease.

  86. Vigilance is essential... by Angostura · · Score: 1

    ... keep 'em peeled.

  87. Slow new day... they want you to beleive that..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even read the wiki article?

    "interest in Fusarium oxysporum as a herbicide was first raised after the discovery in the 1960s "

    So not only this is a problem to some banana republics, government(bush) can with the spread of this herbicide affect the economy of middle america.

    So the first thing that Government who read /. want you to believe is that this is a rumor. It is not. It is conspiracy.

    Now please let me taste those good bananas you are talking about.

    ac.

  88. The prophecy is coming true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once heard a prophet predict this disaster. Everybody laughed at him. If only they had listened.

    Spread the words of the prophet!

    "Yes, we have no bananas."

  89. oblig by Deanalator · · Score: 1

    "This could mean the end of the banana daiquiri as we know it!"

  90. oh man.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those poor bastard monkeys..

  91. Cyclone Larry by ebolaZaireRules · · Score: 1

    No Bananas? Hmmm...

    reminds me of the Banana Crisis of 2006 (otherwise known as Cyclone Larry)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_Cyclone_Larry

    Theres more than one way to skin a... err... banana.

    --
    The Bible: Historically verifiable fact from an observers point of view
  92. Geometric expansion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTH is geometric expansion? I've heard of exponential, but geometric? This is one smart fungus!

  93. Create alarm, plant GM crops, Profit!!! by MacDork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Exactly, how does extinction / loss of a food supply / mutating desease which have earlier almost killed a whole industry become small news?

    This "news" has been around for a long time. Even the summary says so. It's an old story: monoculture -> disease -> no more bananas. Unless you have zero knowledge of bananas, you heard about this years ago. Hmm, I wonder why they'd be raising the alarm now, even when the banana companies like Dole and Chiquita don't care?

    Right now, regulations have prevented even publicly funded research organizations from testing more than a handful of transformed bananas in the field.

    Oh, I see. Somebody wants to skirt regulations regarding transgenic crops. "Won't somebody think of the bananas!!" ... Suckers.

    1. Re:Create alarm, plant GM crops, Profit!!! by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. Somebody wants to skirt regulations regarding transgenic crops. 28 banana strains later...
  94. ...nearly every banana scientist says ... by quonsar · · Score: 1

    Wait...there are banana scientists?

  95. Fusarium, eh? by marxmarv · · Score: 1

    As if we needed another example of the War on (Some) Drugs causing more problems than it solves.

    Is it UpAgainstTheWallMotherfuckers Day yet?

    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
  96. Big Mike is the banana skin of yore by grikdog · · Score: 1

    For some reason around the turn of last century, banana skins -- all of the Big Mike variety -- were a form of ubiquitous garbage in New York City, the center of the known universe then as now, as omnipresent on everyone's sidewalk as poo de poodle is today. Hence, the proverbial slip on a bananaskin, the slapstick schtick of all schtick, that obviates the need for engaging mental processes, such as irony. Apparently, the banana laughs last, but it will be missed.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  97. Re:Oh noes! by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

    I would spend eight years getting a PhD in Banana Science just for an excuse to say so!

    --
    Fnord.
  98. Re:Oh noes! by Bruiser80 · · Score: 1

    I don't think we have much to fear. It appears Bananas that grow arms and legs can't stop talking about peanut butter, jelly, and it being time for said items.

    Just make sure they can't find any baseball bats and we should be fine.

    --
    Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in the mud. After a while, you realize the engineer enjoys it.
  99. And Microsoft analogies ! by DrYak · · Score: 1

    You also forgot to mention how all /. geeks are going to use this as an example of why monocultures are bad, and how this could be used as a model for Microsoft's evilness.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  100. Whaaat? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    I visited Peru years ago and and found their fried plantains to be incredibly tasty, far surpassing the bananas of home.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  101. Re:Oh noes! by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is correct. There are hundreds, if not thousands of varieties of bananas. The reason we don't see them is that many of them aren't as good as the Cavendish; and none of the many varieties that are better store and ship well. So consumers in India and Central America will continue to have access to superior, locally grown varieties.

    However -- this doesn't mean that we should blithely accept the extinction of an important food crop. This is a warning. What if it were rice? Or sweet corn?

    The properties that make bananas vulnerable are shared by many other, more important food crops. Mainly these amount to one thing: the crop in question is economically attractive to plant on a large scale and ship around the world.

    It's important that we look at this as both a lesson, and an opportunity to try out different strategies to respond. The global food supply is already under pressure from energy prices and population growth. It should be manageable over the coming decades, but we shouldn't trust our luck too much.

    This also bears watching because bananas are an extremely important food source in areas where they grow. Even though this is not a variety that is used as a basic staple by anybody, the biology of banana diseases is very important.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  102. Then Regulation Must be the Solution by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    Given that it is not the interest of individual companies to take on the burden of maintaining genetic diversity in food stocks, this condition needs to be IMPOSED upon producers for the safety of humanity. This could easily be accomplished by a small tax on each and every company that sells bananas, markets or ships bananas and resells bananas, since they too benefit from the banana market. It should not be borne solely by the growers, but rather spread as broadly as possible. Ultimately, the public will pay, but the price of insuring the ultimate preservation and safety of the food source would be worth paying. It might add a tenth of a cent to each bunch of banas sold.

    The funds could then be used to totally sequence the banana genome and develop new ways to introduce new useful variation into the cloned lines. It could also be used to study the genome of the various wilting diseases to understand how they destroy bananas.

  103. Re:Oh noes! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    there are problems because people aren't interested in the GM varieties, saying they taste more like apple

    I'm not interested in the GM varieties because we've already seen one case of GM corn producing toxins in a late generation. If you don't do 20 generations of trials you don't know what you're doing. There's little to no real danger than the terminator gene will spread and destroy the world's food, but plenty that some manmade gene will spread and make much of it inedible - and not to mention kill or at least harm a bunch of people before we notice.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  104. New Hit Song on the Way by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, we have no bananas tomorrow.

  105. Oh no! by torry_loon · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the work of General Blight.

  106. Re:Oh noes! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    Slow news day? I think any story about a major threat to our food supply to be a major one, plus it mentions "Banana Scientists"! What is there not to love? Not to mention that bananas wouldn't go extinct if they'd had a space program ! How much more technical can you get ? I think you've hit on it... dolphins don't tend to eat bananas, and rats will eat anything.
  107. nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    For those of you who don't know, nationalize is a codeword that socialists use denote the taking of property by the government. It's similar to emminant domain, except that it is done in the name of "equality and fairness" rather than "the greater good". Of course, in reality it is done as various groups struggle to gain power for their own selfish or egotistical purposes (emminant domain is also usually used in this way).

    That's why you should be wary of the new "national health care" craze. Anything that puts more power in the hands of pollitions takes power away from you, even if they say they're taking it from some rich guy or some corporation. Don't trust pollitions who promise easy answeres and unlimited financial or personal security. They will take whatever authority you give them, and they won't deliver on their promises (even if they honestly intend to try).

    1. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Right, because the national health care plans proposed are just as socialist as the automobile insurance system we have today. Nothing more socialist than purchasing your insurance from a private insurance company.

      Moron.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Exactly what part of "Anything that puts more power in the hands of politicians takes power away from you" did you not understand? I think maybe you are the moron. There is more than one way to needlessly give away your freedom.

      "Nothing more socialist than purchasing your insurance from a private insurance company."

      Are you compelled by law to buy the insurance? That's a needless encroachment on your freedom. Are you forced into a "single payer" system? That's socialism.

    3. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you think I am. One of us is right, and one of us is wrong. Socialized medicine is what we need. Single payer, fully socialized, completely free medicine in the USA. Government owned hospitals, government employed doctors.

      I don't support anything less than that. What the current crop of "pollitions" as you so amusingly spelled it have proposed is basically the same system as our car insurance system.

      If you're not out there ranting in the streets about car insurance or house insurance, you're a fucking hypocrite for ranting about socialized medicine.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    4. Re:nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      "Socialized medicine is what we need."

      Why do we need that? Food is more necessary than health care, do we need socialized food? What about housing, without shelter many of us would die from exposure. Do we also need socialized housing?

      What you want are guarantees and easy answers that the government simply won't be able to give you. Do you honestly believe that socialized medicine will solve our medical care problems? How will it do that? There won't be more doctors or nurses, in fact cost controls will likely reduce the number of medical professionals. All health care systems have a system for determining who will get care and who will do without, because the reality is that you can't treat everyone. Some use gatekeepers, others place emphasis on certain procedures that have a higher benefit to cost ratio. In the US there are exactly two factors determining whether you get treatment: your willingness to pay and your ability to pay. I think this is preferable, since it allows me to make choices for myself (to the extent that I am able to pay).

    5. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Your slippery slope argument is unimpressive.

      We need socialized medicine for two reasons: it's cheaper, and it's better. Show me that capitalized medicine is cheaper and better and I'll go for it.

      Also, show me how much "choice" you have if you're a half million dollars in hock with medical bills. You have the "choice" to die, in other words. That's no choice at all, and when other people have to make that choice, it hurts me. Not bleeding heart hurt, but actually take money from me hurt.

      Also, if Libertarians hate it, it gets a slight bonus for the LOL factor.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    6. Re:nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      It is not a slippery slope argument (slippery slope arguments claim that something will be a problem later on after it snowballs, I'm trying to explain to you that it will erode your freedoms right away). Socialized medicine is a false hope. It may look cheaper in the short term, but in the long run price controls simply force care providers out of the market. You also don't seem to understand the basic principle that the government can not provide services that are unavailable. They can not provide you with a doctor if there is a shortage of doctors. However much medical care our society produces today is the same amount it will produce under a socialized system. Instead of not being able to afford a procedure, your doctor will simply tell you that you can't have it. It solves nothing. At the very least, higher pay rates encourage more people to become doctors and nurses.

      If you want to reform the medical care in this country, you should look at ending employer provided medical insurance (so that people can shop around) and reforming the AMA (because the seem to enjoy capping our number of doctors for no reason at all).

      You should note the old adage "it it seems to good to be true, it probably is". If someone tells you that they can give you free, unlimited medical care, and you don't have to do anything for it, don't listen to them. It doesn't make any sense.

    7. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Slippery slope arguments make the case that one worse thing depends on some other thing. In your case you asked if I were to support socialized housing as well.

      My answer is that socialized housing is not caused by socialized medicine. It's entirely plausible to have completely socialized medicine, but not socialized housing. The question you asked makes no sense.

      Your latest post has no slippery slope argument, and is qualitatively much better as an argument. You make one point, and then you answer your point with the answer I would have given - the AMA does indeed restrict the quantity of doctors, and it's problem. I propose making that illegal. Anybody who passes proper qualifications should be able to be a doctor with no artificial restrictions.

      If someone tells you that they can give you free, unlimited medical care, and you don't have to do anything for it, don't listen to them. It doesn't make any sense.

      I don't think anybody's said that medical care would be free or unlimited, or without any cost. Did I say that?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to say that socialized medicine would lead to socialized housing. I was trying to say that socialized medicine is as pointless and absurd as socialized housing. I think you may have missed that because, maybe, you don't think socialized housing is as absurd as I do.

      "Did I say that?"

      I don't think you said that. But you did say that a single payer system is the only system that will solve the problem. Proponents of socialized medicine tike to make the argument that we need health care for all. They also like to point out situations where poor people in this country have to do without medical care, as an example of what socialized medicine would fix.

      All I'm saying is that since it will do nothing to increase the amount of medical care available, it will do nothing to eliminate or fix our medical care shortage. And if we try to use price controls to control the cost of our system, it will actually reduce the availability of health care moving forward.

      Any valid argument for socialized medicine (especially a single payer system) hinges around the assertion that everyone should have equal access to health care. I think that everyone should have access to health care when they need it. But I don't think it's fair or reasonable to demand that a wealthy person give up their heart transplant simply because a poor person can't afford one. Also, I think it's important that people be able to make their own choices regarding how to spend their money.

    9. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Everybody needs health care all the time. Take a look around at all the fatasses walking down the street. They aren't healthy, and their lack of health care affects everybody.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    10. Re:nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      But if someone doesn't want to pay for it, you shouldn't force them to.

      "Take a look around at all the fatasses walking down the street."

      I don't think fatness is usually caused by a lack of health care. Whenever someone is irresponsible it affects everyone, but living in a free society means putting up with the irresponsibility of others. Better to do that than to lose the ability to be responsible for yourself.

    11. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Yes we should. If they are living in the USA, they're getting the benefits of it. It's a service for everyone that everyone pays for.

      If you don't want to pay for it, leave the country. I'm serious. Get the fuck out. The Boy Scouts will kick you out for not paying your dues, and the USA should kick people out for not paying their dues. So leave.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    12. Re:nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Why should people have to pay for services that they haven't chosen to use? Shouldn't we have an opt-in or at least an opt-out policy. I can see demanding that people pay for national security, since it must be provided to them, but couldn't we just deny medical care to people who don't want to pay. It seems unfair to force people to pay for and use a service when we don't really have to provide it to them.

      It seems especially unfair to say "just leave" to people who were born here and have lived here all their lives. Since you're the one who want's to change things, wouldn't it be better for you to leave? That way you wouldn't be imposing your will unfairly onto other people who see things differently.

    13. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      But on the other hand, it's not fair for you to want to live in a place where you benefit from services that other people pay for. Part of the robustness of a society is provided by people NOT worrying about their medical care and about their medical bills. That robustness benefits you and everybody. With paid-for home care for your parents, you could advance in your career. Lots of people have their lives limited because of an elderly parent they must care for. It's not really a choice for any of us.

      There are places where you can go where the government provides no services at all. Just like you're free to NOT join the Boy Scouts if you don't want to pay the dues and earn their merit badges, you're free to move to one of these regulation-less areas.

      We do have to provide medical service to people. It's a moral value. Withholding medical service to people is immoral. It's the same as not protecting them from an enemy.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    14. Re:nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      "Withholding medical service to people is immoral."

      I agree, however since we *could* refuse service, I don't think it's fair to say that they have to pay. Taking money from people by force is immoral, so we shouldn't do it unless we really have to.

      I say let people who are responsible buy health insurance to alleviate their worry, and let people who are irresponsible chose not to pay. Irresponsible people usually don't have a lot of money anyway.

    15. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      We could refuse service, but that's immoral. We could refuse to defend ourselves, but that's immoral.

      We don't take money from people by force. We provide services that they pay for. Not paying for services you use or benefit from is immoral. It's called theft.

      I am not content to let irresponsible people be irresponsible. It affects me. They wind up in the emergency room and I have to pay for them, but it's a much more expensive way to pay for them.

      Furthermore, you don't seem to realize that medical insurance is the biggest scam out there. Medicine isn't a market, and it doesn't follow market rules. Companies that sell insurance do it to make money, not to provide care. They treat it like a market, which in the best of situations is subject to pricing distortions. These pricing distortions actually kill people. But the medical "market" isn't really a market. Why? Because I'll pay ANYTHING to live. There's no point at which I'll say no thanks to something that will save my life because it's too expensive. So, we get expensive medicine that is paid for by companies which have no reason to fulfill their end of the bargain to pay for your care. They make you jump through some awful hoops, because they can. The alternative is death. A huge number of bankruptcies are due to people who are saddled by medical bills, even though they were "responsible" and had insurance. Good insurance. This is wrong.

      When people can do all the right things and still wind up completely fucked by the system which is far more powerful than they are, that's wrong. That's not freedom at all. If you spend a decade or two of your life putting your life's dreams and goals on hold because you have to care for a sick parent with a rotting brain, and then you wind up hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, it's a poor consolation to be expected to think "I'm independent, and that's what matters." No, you're not independent. You paid years of your life and owe hundreds of thousands of dollars to the people who completely screwed you with the idea that you're an independent agent who is somehow more free and more of a man because you took the libertarian view of things.

      A libertarian wouldn't stubbornly stick to this crazy notion. A libertarian would voluntarily band together with his fellow man to pool the risk, recognizing that every person shares the single quality of being human. Every human is mortal, and every human is more free when they are free of the agents who use FORCE to take advantage of everybody's natural inclination to pay anything to live.

      Libertarians are famous for not wanting to use force against anyone, except in self-defense. I am trying to persuade you here that these cocksuckers who sell you insurance that doesn't insure you, and who perpetuate the fiction that health care is a market like any other are using some pretty powerful force against you already. Defend yourself!

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    16. Re:nationalize = steal by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      "Not paying for services you use or benefit from is immoral. It's called theft."

      Not if you don't ask for them. You don't have to pay that guy who washes your window when you stopped at a stoplight.

      "I am not content to let irresponsible people be irresponsible."

      Then you're not content to let people be free.

      "Companies that sell insurance do it to make money, not to provide care."

      As does any insurance company. Is car insurance or homeowners insurance also a scam? Of course not. The only reason medical insurance is different is people don't shop around for it. It doesn't have to be that way.

      "These pricing distortions actually kill people."

      No, a lack of trained medical professionals is what is killing people. Insurance companies are just in the unfortunate position of deciding who gets care and who doesn't. If it wasn't them making the decisions, it would be someone else. What is unacceptable is that the medical establishment seems content barring people from the market and setting quotas for no good reason other than tradition.

      "They make you jump through some awful hoops, because they can."

      No, they are trying to get rid of the people who don't really need care. The (flawed) assumption is that someone who really needs care will jump through hoops to get it.

      "No, you're not independent. You paid years of your life and owe hundreds of thousands of dollars to the people who completely screwed you with the idea that you're an independent agent who is somehow more free and more of a man because you took the libertarian view of things."

      Fine, then tell people that and let them decide for themselves, you don't know everything, and people have a right to decide for themselves. That's all I'm saying.

      "A libertarian would voluntarily band together with his fellow man to pool the risk, "

      That is what insurance is!!!!!!! Why do you think it would be any different if the government ran it? Because they would simply deny you care and let you die rather than let you bankrupt yourself? I'd rather be bankrupt than dead! I think that's a choice I should have!

      "I am trying to persuade you here that these cocksuckers who sell you insurance that doesn't insure you, and who perpetuate the fiction that health care is a market like any other are using some pretty powerful force against you already."

      Health insurance most certainly can be a market. General care, and long term care, and many other forms of healthcare are markets like any other. The only case where this is not true is emergency care. But you can shop for insurance for that. It's just that people don't because there is a huge tax incentive for using their employers health insurance.

      "Defend yourself!"

      You do that using lawsuits and criminal trials, not by nationalizing an entire sector of the economy. How will you defend yourself when it's the government screwing you? It will be a lot harder.

    17. Re:nationalize = steal by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      And so we are at an impasse. My arguments have been laid out, and rebutting you here would involve repeating myself. So now, that is all that I have to say. I don't think your reasons for rejecting my arguments are very good, but what I think of your arguments is irrelevant. I think if you go back through our discussion, you'll find that all your points were addressed previously.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  108. Re:Oh noes! by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

    Isn't that how it always is? The people who are already struggling just get hit harder. At least there's some warning. The question is what the companies/communities/governments will do about it.

    Perhaps there's another staple crop that can be started in those areas so that the economies can begin shifting away from bananas before drop-dead time comes -- rice, wheat, potatoes....?

  109. Re:Oh noes! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

    I think you've hit on it... dolphins don't tend to eat bananas, and rats will eat anything. *And* rats have hands (almost).

    OTOH, if that disease is catching...
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  110. Lest we forget... by hellfire · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why is it a disease? I like bananas. Why should I not eat bananas? I understand that you want everyone to live according to your standards and morality, but really, why should I not eat bananas?

    At the end of the 19th century, with the help of the US government, food companies like Dole and Chiquita helped create and prop up "banana republics" in latin america, which were in fact figurehead dictatorships geared towards producing raw materials and crops for US consumption, like bananas. In fact, before that time, the #1 most popular fruit in the US was the apple, but thanks to these companies, they turned that part of our culture on it's head and created a massive campaign to make the banana #1, using the pricing power of cheap bananas and government influence to steamroll a fruit that was, and still is, produced locally by US farmers.

    The reason why they did this is not because bananas are better tasting or better for you, but because they were cheaper than local produce when you factor in highly cheap labor of the impoverished populace and favorable political conditions gained by less than ethical means.

    And to be honest, Apples taste better than bananas. An apple is more durable, and can be made into more things, and supports your local economy .

    This is absolutely bonkers. My wife's family lives in Wisconsin. You want them to survive on local produce over the winter? You want them to hoard dry goods so they can eat 6 months out of the year? Not to mention the exciting selection of nutritional deficits that most of the world suffered from before cheap year round fresh food selections. Really, this type of judgmental viewpoint bothers me so much. I really see your "EAT THIS WAY OR YOU HAVE A DISEASE!" moralism as no different from right wingers who think homosexuality is a disease.

    You'd be surprised the number of vegatables that can be grown late into the fall season. In wisconsin, you don't exactly have to grow the vegetables near Madison, but there are tons of places within the continental US where you can get produce shipped north. You can cross the US from top to bottom by train or 18 wheeler in two days without trying very hard, And we ship things more fragile than fruit by truck these days.

    You are taking the metaphor the GP is making way too far. Those who say "homosexuality is a disease" come from an illogical and bigoted stance about the inequality of "races" when in fact there's nothing biological to suggest one "race" is inferior to the other. On the other hand, to play devils advocate, not all fruits are created equal. Also, see my entry above about how the banana became popular by government and big business influence. There's some good reasons why you can be negative about this fruit.

    Are you just making this up as you go along? Watching people "line up" for bananas in a supermarket? Food scarcity hasn't exactly been a problem in America in a number of years, I would be very interested in where you've seen people "line up" to get bananas, while bypassing all other fruits.

    Food scarcity isn't a problem, but living in the middle and not on the more populated coasts, perhaps you simply don't see that sometimes the bananas on the shelves get sold out and they haven't restocked the shelves yet. I've seen that plenty of times. Then some people have to wait. It particularly happens in less affluent areas with high population density. Doesn't happen every day, but it's simply a matter of shelf space not food scarcity.

    Good for you! We should all be more like you, thanks for holding yourself out there as an example of the Right Way to live!

    You're welcome. Perhaps I can show you how to live better by trying to reduce your carbon footprint. After all, buying product locally as well as reducing my carbon footprint has positive impacts on my fellow human beings that I should be concerned with. Or would you rather just let your fellow man slip on a banana peel, break his neck, lose his job and his life savings and say "tough shit I don't care about you"?

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Lest we forget... by Moridineas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the end of the 19th century, with the help of the US government, food companies like Dole and Chiquita helped create and prop up "banana republics" in latin america, which were in fact figurehead dictatorships geared towards producing raw materials and crops for US consumption, like bananas. In fact, before that time, the #1 most popular fruit in the US was the apple, but thanks to these companies, they turned that part of our culture on it's head and created a massive campaign to make the banana #1, using the pricing power of cheap bananas and government influence to steamroll a fruit that was, and still is, produced locally by US farmers. You have come up with this incredibly complicated reason to explain why...wait for it...people like bananas. Why does it have to be sinister? They taste good. Why do you have to try to explain simple human behavior by a sinister corporate conspiracy? Whatever happened to Ockham's razor? Yes, Some terrible things have been done in the past, I'm not going to stop eating a food I like because of some actions by people dead for 50 years. I like apples too.

      The reason why they did this is not because bananas are better tasting or better for you, but because they were cheaper than local produce when you factor in highly cheap labor of the impoverished populace and favorable political conditions gained by less than ethical means. Damn those evil corporations for forcing us to eat a food we all hate!

      And to be honest, Apples taste better than bananas. An apple is more durable, and can be made into more things, and supports your local economy . De gustibus non est disputandum. Once the conversation gets to the absurd point of "well, apples taste better, so there!" you can't really keep it going rationally.

      I also have to question apples being more durable? Ever been to an apple orchard?

      there are tons of places within the continental US where you can get produce shipped north. You can cross the US from top to bottom by train or 18 wheeler in two days without trying very hard, And we ship things more fragile than fruit by truck these days. Of course--that's the point. "In season" has no meaning anymore. The GP's point was that it is somehow wrong to eat fruit except in the height of summer wherever you are. I think that is utterly ludicrous. I absolutely agree with what you say here.

      You are taking the metaphor the GP is making way too far. Those who say "homosexuality is a disease" come from an illogical and bigoted stance about the inequality of "races I wasn't aware sexuality and race were linked... GP is just as bigoted about those who choose to live life differently than he/she wants them to..

      Food scarcity isn't a problem, but living in the middle and not on the more populated coasts, perhaps you simply don't see that sometimes the bananas on the shelves get sold out and they haven't restocked the shelves yet. I've seen that plenty of times. Then some people have to wait. It particularly happens in less affluent areas with high population density. Doesn't happen every day, but it's simply a matter of shelf space not food scarcity. I actually live on the east coast, but have lived in Chicago. Can't ever remember seeing a run on bananas... I'll concede the grandparent wasn't speaking literally but was just making yet another hyperbole.

      You're welcome. Perhaps I can show you how to live better by trying to reduce your carbon footprint. After all, buying product locally as well as reducing my carbon footprint has positive impacts on my fellow human beings that I should be concerned with. You're welcome? are you the GP as well? I actually have a garden in my yard with about a dozen tomato plants, etc. I don't have to expend any petrocarbon to get them! guess what, I compost and am 100% organic too. I can play the yuppie/hippie game wth the best of them, I just can't stand sanctimonious holier than thou, for lack of a better word, morons who want us back in the stone age!
    2. Re:Lest we forget... by director_mr · · Score: 1

      Why is it a disease? I like bananas. Why should I not eat bananas? I understand that you want everyone to live according to your standards and morality, but really, why should I not eat bananas? At the end of the 19th century, with the help of the US government, food companies like Dole and Chiquita helped create and prop up "banana republics" in latin america, which were in fact figurehead dictatorships geared towards producing raw materials and crops for US consumption, like bananas. In fact, before that time, the #1 most popular fruit in the US was the apple, but thanks to these companies, they turned that part of our culture on it's head and created a massive campaign to make the banana #1, using the pricing power of cheap bananas and government influence to steamroll a fruit that was, and still is, produced locally by US farmers. The reason why they did this is not because bananas are better tasting or better for you, but because they were cheaper than local produce when you factor in highly cheap labor of the impoverished populace and favorable political conditions gained by less than ethical means. And to be honest, Apples taste better than bananas. An apple is more durable, and can be made into more things, and supports your local economy . This is absolutely bonkers. My wife's family lives in Wisconsin. You want them to survive on local produce over the winter? You want them to hoard dry goods so they can eat 6 months out of the year? Not to mention the exciting selection of nutritional deficits that most of the world suffered from before cheap year round fresh food selections. Really, this type of judgmental viewpoint bothers me so much. I really see your "EAT THIS WAY OR YOU HAVE A DISEASE!" moralism as no different from right wingers who think homosexuality is a disease. You'd be surprised the number of vegatables that can be grown late into the fall season. In wisconsin, you don't exactly have to grow the vegetables near Madison, but there are tons of places within the continental US where you can get produce shipped north. You can cross the US from top to bottom by train or 18 wheeler in two days without trying very hard, And we ship things more fragile than fruit by truck these days. You are taking the metaphor the GP is making way too far. Those who say "homosexuality is a disease" come from an illogical and bigoted stance about the inequality of "races" when in fact there's nothing biological to suggest one "race" is inferior to the other. On the other hand, to play devils advocate, not all fruits are created equal. Also, see my entry above about how the banana became popular by government and big business influence. There's some good reasons why you can be negative about this fruit. Are you just making this up as you go along? Watching people "line up" for bananas in a supermarket? Food scarcity hasn't exactly been a problem in America in a number of years, I would be very interested in where you've seen people "line up" to get bananas, while bypassing all other fruits. Food scarcity isn't a problem, but living in the middle and not on the more populated coasts, perhaps you simply don't see that sometimes the bananas on the shelves get sold out and they haven't restocked the shelves yet. I've seen that plenty of times. Then some people have to wait. It particularly happens in less affluent areas with high population density. Doesn't happen every day, but it's simply a matter of shelf space not food scarcity. Good for you! We should all be more like you, thanks for holding yourself out there as an example of the Right Way to live! You're welcome. Perhaps I can show you how to live better by trying to reduce your carbon footprint. After all, buying product locally as well as reducing my carbon footprint has positive impacts on my fellow human beings that I should be concerned with. Or would you rather just let your fellow man slip on a banana peel, break his neck, lose his job and his life savings and say "tough shit I don't care

  111. Re:Oh noes! by Skrapion · · Score: 1

    Clearly, the only person who can save us from the anthropomorphic banana is the man with a spoon that is too big.

    "I am a BANANA!"

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  112. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Popular Science had an article about this three years ago (06.22.2005). See http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2005-06/can-fruit-be-saved

  113. Yes, We Have no Bananas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes,_We_Have_No_Bananas

  114. Re:Oh noes! by artson · · Score: 1

    "However -- this doesn't mean that we should blithely accept the extinction of an important food crop. This is a warning. What if it were rice? Or sweet corn?"

    I don't believe in scare tactics, but you are right on the money. Consider the case of Ug99, a very appropriate name and a very dangerous threat to the world wheat and barley crop.

    If I was a politico in the wheat growing states and provinces, I might take a dim view of anyone growing ornamental barberry bushes. So far as I know, we don't have a defence against this dangerous wheat and barley blight.

    Given the enormous amount of travel today, both people and plant diseases are incredibly easy to transmit. We'll have to get used to it.

    --
    In times of trouble, the smell of frying onions usually gives confidence and comfort.
  115. I knew we should've let Noriega in charge! by LaoziSailor · · Score: 1

    I knew we should've let Noriega in charge! ...see what you get from USA interventionism? Bananas are a staple for atheletes! ... what'll I do now?

    --
    ~ Artificial Intelligence is better than none! ~
  116. Socialized medicine is what we need. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Single payer, fully socialized, completely free medicine in the USA. Government owned hospitals, government employed doctors.

    BS! What we need is for the government to give everyone the same benefits a business gets for offering employees health insurance. The problem with health care in the US today stems from World War II. Then the federal government passed and enacted price and wage control laws. Employers were barred from offering employees or potential employees more pay, so to allow employers to attract and keep employees the government allowed employers to offer fringe benefits such as health insurance giving them tax breaks on those benefits. Now if those tax breaks were extended to people who bought their own health insurance the competition between insurance policy issuers would drive the cost of health insurance down.

    By forcing those who buy and pay for their own insurance to pay for other's insurance, you're robbing Peter to pay Paul. You're also subsidizing other people's bad life style choices. I don't want to, and no one should, be forced to pay for someone else's bad choices. Such as eating too many tymes at fast food places, or smoking, or drinking, or not exercising. And I admit I'm one of those who smokes, when I last had insurance I paid more because I did smoke which I'm fine with, and I don't exercise enough. However I also used watch what I eat and take vitamin and mineral supplements.

    Simply neither I nor any one else who tries to lead a healthful life style should not have to subsidize others' bad choices.

    What the current crop of "pollitions" as you so amusingly spelled it have proposed is basically the same system as our car insurance system.

    Which I don't have a problem with, though I would make some changes. And yes I have dealt with the car insurance system in the US. More than 10 years ago as a college student after my classes one day I was riding my bike when I was hit by a moving van, Apartment Movers type, and was medivacted by helicopter to a hospital. Actually that's how my mother found out I was injured, she works as a lab tech in the hospital. I spent something like a month in the hospital, some of that tyme in a coma. When I left, I was moved to live in a rehabilitation house where I spent another month and a half. Because I'm single and was in a coma a judge assigned my mother as my legal guardian, so when I left rehab I was moved into my moms house. Then for about 3 months I went to therapy 5 days a week at the hospital.

    All told my medical bills came to more than $120,000 and I had no insurance, car or health. However my mom hired an attorney, my sister's friend. Because the driver of the van was weaving all over the road and clearly caused the accident, he's a diabetic and has a history of causing accidents due to the fact that he does not take care of his diabetes, his employer decided to settle the lawsuit before it ever went before a jury. The medical bills were paid for out of the settlement, with the rest put into a trust fund to take care of me. As I said above, I'd change the system, I'd make it so the guilty party had to pay for the medical expenses of someone disabled, and I am a survivor of a disability, or for health insurance for them for life. Because of the injury I have been refused health insurance, and after the settlement I spent another year in therapy. Even then though I still didn't get as must as I needed but I couldn't afford more.

    Falcon
    1. Re:Socialized medicine is what we need. by JimFive · · Score: 1

      Simply neither I nor any one else who tries to lead a healthful life style should not have to subsidize others' bad choices.
      Except that this is the entire point of insurance. Pooling risk. Those who use fewer services subsidize those who use more services. The extra that you pay buys you a bit of peace of mind in case you ever end up on the receiving end of the equation.
      --
      JimFive
      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    2. Re:Socialized medicine is what we need. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Except that this is the entire point of insurance. Pooling risk.

      There's a difference between people living similar life styles pooling risk and pooling everyone, I did say because I smoke I paid a higher premium when I last had health insurance. And I was fine with that, I just would have liked to have other risk factors taken into consideration as well. I used to watch my diet and exercised a lot. Actually when I had an accident while riding my bike I rode it about 200 miles a week. I also worked out in dance, as an amateur I danced on stage for the theatre.

      Falcon
    3. Re:Socialized medicine is what we need. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      That's like saying that people who have 2 DUIs and 5 speeding tickets pay the same for car insurance as people who don't drink and have never gotten a ticket. They pay more. . .a lot more.

      Pooling risk covers factors beyond your control. If you have a say in it, it's not a risk, it's choice.

  117. crap apples by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    The fruit of the crab apple is often quite flavorful, it's just small and usually not very sweet.

    I only like sour tasting apples and there was a crap apple trees near one junior high school I went to that had some fabulous apples.

    Falcon
  118. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Citation needed]

  119. growing new crops by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Hopefully those farmers will be smart enough to invest in a new food.

    However by the tyme a farmer knows a crop is going to fail it may be too late for them.

    Those that can't or won't have the option to sell their land.

    If they can find a buyer, a big "if", selling their land may put them in a worse position.

    Not to mention people going hungry.

    We got hungry people in the United States, too. Let's fix our own house before we start crying about our neighbor.

    I think feeding the hungry in the US, as well as in the Third World, is economically easy, the problem is political. Multi billion dollar US multinational corporations get billions of US taxpayer dollars in subsidies, Archer Daniels Midland has been called the Corporate Welfare Queen. Instead of the corporate paid politicians giving all that money to large corporations, if the money was given to charities like soup kitchens if not directly to those who need the help, then there's no reason they should go hungry. And by corporations not getting those hugh subsidies, they would have to compeat with Third World farmers. As it has been since NAFTA was ratified, Mexican farmers have been driven off their farms because they can't grow corn for what ADM and Cargill can export and sell corn for in Mexico. The Doha rounds of the WTO failed because First World Nations, specifically the EU and Japan refused to budge on subsiding their farmers, though Bush did agree to cut some US subsidies.

    Falcon
  120. I completely agree by hassanchop · · Score: 1

    Most of the civilized parts of Europe had outlawed slavery by 1200 AD, with Britain being one of the last at outlawing it in 1770. The only western nations of any significance with active slavery after that were America and France.


    I totally agree, Britain is responsible for slavery in America and as such, shoudl have their products boycotted. Had they not colonized the area and developed an economy reliant on slavery things would have been much better off.

    I agree, the British are to blame for slavery in the US.
  121. With all due respect... by hassanchop · · Score: 1

    That's a pretty pathetic excuse. If they wanted in badly enough they'd have it. I know, I know, the all powerful US hegemony would shut them down, just like in Vietnam and Korea before that.

    Oh wait...

    1. Re:With all due respect... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty pathetic excuse. If they wanted in badly enough they'd have it. I know, I know, the all powerful US hegemony would shut them down, just like in Vietnam and Korea before that.

      There's a big difference between what happened with gunboat diplomacy before WWII and what happened after. There wasn't much standing in the way of the US before. However afterwards China and the Soviet Union supported North Korea and Viet Nam. Actually one of Stalin's conditions for supporting the Chinese Communists in their fight against the Kuomintang or KMT and Nationalists was that they in turn support the communists in Korea. As for Viet Nam, notice I didn't spell it "Vietnam" it was originally two words not one, the US entered it when President Eisenhower sent Col Edward Lansdale to arm, support, and train Viet Namese who opposed democracy. France and North and South Viet Nam had reached an agreement, the Geneva Accords, in 1954 for both parts of the country to hold an election on whether the north and south would reunify. Col Lansdale was sent to Viet Nam in 1955 to prevent this vote. And the thing is is at first Ho Chi Min first asked the US's help in expelling the French, but when the US refused to he turned to the Soviets. France then decided to withdraw while Eisenhower decided to send in troops.

      Then again the US did the same with China, Mao Tze Tong asked the US's support but the US refused. Though Stalin didn't like the Chinese Communists, he called them Margarine Communists because whereas the Russian brand of communism was about industrial workers, "soviet" means "worker" in English, China's brand was about the peasantry or farm workers., he gave them aid. From the 1800s, with the Opium Wars or as the British called it the Boxer Rebellion, to the 1930s and '40s China was controlled by other nations. Mao wanted to end the foreign domination.

      Falcon
  122. Re:Oh noes! by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

    I'm not interested in the GM varieties because we've already seen one case of GM corn producing toxins in a late generation. I'd really like a cite on that.

    There's little to no real danger than the terminator gene will spread and destroy the world's food, Reason 1 - because nobody is using it.
    Reason 2 - because the whole point of it is to prevent genes from spreading.

    but plenty that some manmade gene will spread and make much of it inedible First, they're not man made - they're just moved from one organism to another. Second, you are constantly eating food with uncontrolled natural mutations, are you scared of them?

    and not to mention kill or at least harm a bunch of people before we notice. Peanuts kill people every day! Ban them, ban them! See, I can scare-monger, just like you!
  123. It all comes down to demographics by acheron12 · · Score: 1

    If you outnumber them, you win. If you are outnumbered, you lose. This is what distinguishes the modern colonial states (USA, Canada, Australia, etc.) from the colonies which collapsed all over the rest of the world in the 20th century (India, South Africa, etc.)

    --
    there is no god but truth, and reality is its prophet
    1. Re:It all comes down to demographics by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yup... and you can do it military or you can do it internally by outbreeding (hispanics in the us, islamics in europe, palestinians in isreal, etc...).

      That's why ultimately, I think a pro-breeding culture will prevail and as a race we will breed to collapse.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  124. How about vat grown bananas? by acheron12 · · Score: 1

    If PETA thinks we can do it with meat, why not with bananas?

    We could even make banana flavoured meat. Or meat-flavoured bananas!

    --
    there is no god but truth, and reality is its prophet
  125. Re:Oh noes! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I'd really like a cite on that.

    okay.

    In addition, the excessive Bt in the Bt Corn (20% of the US corn production, so far) has long-term repercussions to the soil.

    Second, you are constantly eating food with uncontrolled natural mutations, are you scared of them?

    Nope. See, in nature a single organism tends to be mutated and either passes on its genes or not, whereas in modern agriculture we create big monocrops and do our utmost to ensure that they survive, and (assuming they don't have the terminator gene or are otherwise sterile) pass on their genes.

    Peanuts kill people every day! Ban them, ban them! See, I can scare-monger, just like you!

    Peanuts kill people through an allergy, but toxins kill people because they're toxic.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  126. Please stop by hassanchop · · Score: 1

    Your excuses are just too difficult to tolerate.

    I said "Vietnam and Korea before that" to moot your retarded point. You didn't do anything to moot mine, but droned on about shit that in no way changes that "Vietnam and Korea before that" did what you seem to think can't be done.

    That a long post you made that completely fails to do anything to refute my argument.

  127. Your excuses are just too difficult to tolerate. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    And your rambling is getting difficult to tolerate, in which case I'm ending this.

    Falcon
  128. Re:Oh noes! by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

    I'd really like a cite on that. okay. A study that, after a proper statistical analysis, showed no effect, and don't raise any human health concerns according to the European Food Safety Authority.

    long-term repercussions to the soil. This might be an issue, but it isn't a health concern non-insects. And the fact that the article cites the discredited "monarch butterfly caterpillars" study means the rest should be taken with a grain of salt.

    Second, you are constantly eating food with uncontrolled natural mutations, are you scared of them? Nope. See, in nature a single organism tends to be mutated ... we create big monocrops and do our utmost to ensure that they survive... My point was that any organism that you eat could have a mutation, and thus be the first of its kind to be toxic.
    Monoculture may cause problems, but they're unrelated to GM tech.

    Peanuts kill people through an allergy, but toxins kill people because they're toxic. But you're still dead, right?
  129. No, you're running like a bitch by hassanchop · · Score: 1

    And your accurate analysis is getting difficult to tolerate, in which case I'm running away like a bitch because I know you're right.


    FYP to make it true.

    Go ahead and run, you have no other option.
  130. Re:Oh noes! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    My point was that any organism that you eat could have a mutation, and thus be the first of its kind to be toxic.

    And my point is that if it is, you're only going to eat one. But if it's a whole field...

    Monoculture may cause problems, but they're unrelated to GM tech.

    On the other hand, most of the problems with GM tech are related to monocultures. See what I did there?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  131. Re:Oh noes! by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

    And my point is that if it is, you're only going to eat one. But if it's a whole field... ...then it's the same as if it's a whole field of regular old hybrid corn.

    On the other hand, most of the problems with GM tech are related to monocultures. See what I did there? Let me guess:

    Changing the subject?
    Blending two subjects that are only tangentially related in order to discredit one of them?
    Playing word games?
    Realizing that the real problems with modern agriculture have nothing to do with GM?

    You tell me.

  132. Not a problem if you use tissue cultures. by dsmatthews · · Score: 1

    Genetic material held as frozen tissue cultures will allow a temporary but total destruction of any plant species in the wild. Once the pathogen dies off due to lack of hosts the stocks of the plant can be rapidly replenished. It is the temporal equivalent of crop rotation. Gene blending between infertile varieties of plants is also possible. dan@tekgnu.com