Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Unveils "World's Thinnest" QWERTY Smartphone

Barence writes "Nokia has revamped its E-series of business-oriented smartphones with two new models, including the 'world's thinnest' QWERTY device. The GPS-enabled E71 is the slimmer successor to the Nokia E61, with a thickness of only 1cm. It's HSDPA-enabled, offers switchable home screens, and gives a claimed 'two full days of heavy, heavy use.' The E66, on the other hand, is a slide-phone with a conventional numerical keypad and a built-in accelerometer. At the same event, Nokia also gave a tantalizing hint about its plans for an iPhone rival, with its senior vice president saying, 'we will have touchscreen devices coming this year.'"

67 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. for a quick fix fine by jacquesm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But I don't see anybody coding up the next installment of gcc on these keyboards :)

    And the speed with which some of my (female) friends can SMS using the shorthand method is simply amazing.

    Personally I use my phone to call with, the camera function is nice to have (and a better camera would be a good reason to upgrade the phone) but after playing with the internet features a bit I really don't find much use for them.

    The 'qwerty' bit is nice (same as with the blackberry) but it would not be enough to get me to switch (and the keys will be *even smaller*).

    1. Re:for a quick fix fine by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

      The 'qwerty' bit is nice (same as with the blackberry) but it would not be enough to get me to switch (and the keys will be *even smaller*)

      Hey, if you don't mind having the hammers that make the letters jam when you type too fast, stick to what you're using. Personally, I think there's a real need in the world for technology that makes people type slower, and I'm sure it's going to take the world by storm. I'm filing my fingernails to points in anticipation this very moment.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:for a quick fix fine by jacquesm · · Score: 2, Funny

      hehe, a wolf that is sharpening his nails to points will have me go the opposite direction :)

      I'm trying to remember when I last used an actual typewriter but I can't pinpoint it any better than 1982 or so...

    3. Re:for a quick fix fine by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. Having a full qwerty keyboard would be nice, but in this instance, and many others, it just means that the actual number keys are quite a bit smaller. I'd rather have number keys I can actually press rather than having an extra 10 cpm typing rate on 160 byte messages.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:for a quick fix fine by deathlyslow · · Score: 2, Funny

      BAH I graduated in '89. You insensitive clod.
      There now you don't feel old... I do.

      --
      Don't blame me for redundant posts. I can't type very fast. Hence the user ID.
    5. Re:for a quick fix fine by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would by my grade 9 typing class for me. 1988-89. Coming up on 20 years ago... damn I feel old.

      Funny, I remember grade 9 typing being a prerequisite for computer courses, and thinking at the time how stupid that was. But it probably did more good for my career in IT than any of the high school computer programming classes I subsequently took.

      BTW: You are old.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    6. Re:for a quick fix fine by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You had typewriters!?!?

      We had to pound moose antlers into antelope hide using logs for the pounding... a different antler for every letter too... and don't even get me started about having to chew the hide smooth first or what we had to do for carbon copies.... kids, sheesh, don't know how lucky they got it I tell ya.....

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    7. Re:for a quick fix fine by snoyberg · · Score: 4, Funny

      You think that was hard... at my school, we had to use WINDOWS!

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    8. Re:for a quick fix fine by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      I agree. I've had it with flip and sliding phones. Everybody I know with a flip/sliding phone, and every one of my phones that did the same eventually had the keypad or screen stop working. I just went back to a candybar phone after my last sliding phone died. I actually like the fact that there are no moving parts, and have no problem remembering to lock the keypad when I'm done with it.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:for a quick fix fine by raju1kabir · · Score: 2

      The so-called "candybar" format is the best use of space and with either auto-locking, or just a habit of pressing the appropriate key combination to lock the keypad

      Agreed. I have the E61i, and I keep it in my pocket all the time. It's not a problem, in fact sometimes I worry that I've lost it and have to tap my pocket to check that it's still there.

      As for QWERTY phones, I just don't get it. How often does anyone who supposedly needs that degree of "connectivity", actually require a real keyboard (or rough approximation of one) when there isn't a laptop near at hand ?

      With this phone I can go on unauthorized vacations with only a carry-on bag and know that I can still deal with problems that come up at the office. Having a keyboard that provides for reasonably-quick shell typing is well worth it in my opinion.

      And on a day-to-day basis, it means I can go to the park or the bar when my colleagues are still working, in cases when all that's expected of me is being in rapid email contact.

      I have some problems with the E61i but the form factor ain't one of 'em. It's been great for my lifestyle.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    10. Re:for a quick fix fine by trooperer · · Score: 2, Funny

      moose antlers? Luxury. Back then we used to have to get up at six o'clock in the morning, look for stag beetles and use their antlers...

    11. Re:for a quick fix fine by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get off this man's lawn already!

      --
      "Little is much when little you need."
    12. Re:for a quick fix fine by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 4, Funny

      I remember when they released Windows RG. Ahhhh, good times...

      --
      "Little is much when little you need."
    13. Re:for a quick fix fine by morcego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize some people actually use their smartphones for other things than phone calls and SMS ? Like remote computer maintenance (ssh) ?

      Trust me, even if you can find a ssh client for a non-qwerty phone (and you can), it is simply impossible to do anything.

      I love my Nokia E62. To a point I never even bothered to upgrade to a E61 (I don't need a camera ou Wifi).

      --
      morcego
    14. Re:for a quick fix fine by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you really need to do remote maintenance, wouldn't it be nice to get a laptop with a data card?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    15. Re:for a quick fix fine by morcego · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah. I have one of those (actually, I use my E62 as a "data card"). Unfortunately, it doesn't fit in my pocket. It is not small enough to be non-intrusive when I go to the supermarket.

      Also, why would I need to carry something as big as a laptop (even a 12" one) when all I need is ssh ? Carry a laptop and a cell phone, since I have to receive calls.

      This little baby here makes my life much easier, but I know I'm the exception to the rule. Most people (98% ? Maybe more ?) get smartphones just for SMS and e-mail (if that!). But I'm glad they do, since it drives the price down quite a bit.

      As a side note, I also read books on my smart phone. The screen is very nice for it, even if I don't need the qwerty keyboard for that particular task.

      --
      morcego
    16. Re:for a quick fix fine by Elsapotk421 · · Score: 2, Funny

      BAH I graduated in '89. You insensitive clod.
      There now you don't feel old... I do.

      BAH I graduated in '89. You insensitive clod. There now you don't feel old... I do. Just to make you feel older I took typing in 8th grade class in 1999.
      --
      We came,we saw, we kicked it's ass!
  2. Why Why Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why can't the people making these devices with "full QWERTY keyboards", actually include the row for numbers. Having to switch modes to type numbers and then have all the alternate symbols on the number buttoms (!@#$, etc) hidden elsewhere is such an incredible pain. I would deal with the device being an eight of an inch longer in order to actually include a full keyboard.

    1. Re:Why Why Why? by BacOs · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've got an LG Voyager and it's got the row for numbers.

    2. Re:Why Why Why? by jonfr · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:Why Why Why? by T-Bone-T · · Score: 2

      Why would you want to carry around a number pad? That seems to be close to the epitome of inconvenience.

    4. Re:Why Why Why? by flosofl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anecdote fight! Anecdote fight!

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    5. Re:Why Why Why? by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why can't the people making these devices with "full QWERTY keyboards", actually include the row for numbers. You want dedicated keys for numbers? ON A TELEPHONE?!?
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  3. Touch Screens by oahazmatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we will have touchscreen devices coming this year Fine. As long as their not too small, are easily manageble, not too cluttered or prone to mis-cues or a sudden lack of input.

    If you can't promise that, keep it off my phone.
    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
    1. Re:Touch Screens by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      As a happy Nokia E61 user, a touchscreen is not terribly important. I like this unit, though I'd rather get it sans the camera.
      The E61 fueled my Google Reader addiction, helping me get through boring classes and keeping me entertained while wondering when my flight was actually taking off.
      The S60 software has the simplest setup for use as a wireless modem I've ever encountered, and the T-Mobile GPRS service has been, while not exactly cheap, extremely useful and effective.
      Not to be too glaring a shill, I'll give my Nokia Ex1 experience 2.5 snaps out of 3 in a "Z" formation, and strongly consider upgrading to this svelte gadget.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  4. Society's perfectionistic standards are just.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    going overboard. First ultra thin models giving young girls a false sense of their bodies and the phones. How do you expect the young phones to feel when they see these thin phones? Huh?

  5. Looks good by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm forever after a phone that I can use ssh with easily for when I'm on call, so a full qwerty keyboard is mandatory. This one is actually looking good with an easily accessible @ / and . characters. Does anyone else have any other recommendations?

    --
    Free Playstation 3, XBox 360 and Nintendo Wii

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    1. Re:Looks good by jacquesm · · Score: 3, Informative

      there was a *much* older nokia phone with a slide that exposed a good size keyboard, a friend of mine used it quite a bit to keep an eye on a large serverfarm.

      here is an image of what the phone looked like:

      http://www.mobileburn.com/media/nokia/9300/9300_open-IMG_9425.jpg

      also there is this old ./ thread:

      http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/08/0214240&tid=215

    2. Re:Looks good by weston · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, the iPhone is a great --- kidding! :)

      The E70 looks pretty good. I had its predecessor (the 6822) for a while and quite liked even that.

      There's also a good review here. ;)

      I do happen to think the iPhone is great, but if you want a good keyboard, it's probably not what you want, and I found that the fold out keyboard seemed easier for me to use than most on mobiles.

    3. Re:Looks good by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is the current version.

    4. Re:Looks good by Kazymyr · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  6. Great... by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...for the rest of the world. Now if we could just get a carrier to stock Nokia again in the US.

    1. Re:Great... by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      AT&T will carry this phone, according to this

    2. Re:Great... by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was desperately wondering why people in USA doesn't take Nokia serious but after months of watching and comparing US market versus Europe, I decided people has _right_ to see iPhone as second coming of Jesus.

      How come they never shipped any good thing to USA market? You know what? It will take years and billions of dollars for Nokia to get taken serious in USA. Even technical people get amazed when I show specs of my Nokia E65 (older E66) not knowing Nokia can produce things like that.

      I was wondering how come people get impressed by push IMAP in iPhone while my 9300 from 2003 can do it without even asking and I noticed lots of people doesn't even know there is a smart phone (laptop?) like 9300 exists.

    3. Re:Great... by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How come they never shipped any good thing to USA market? I have a theory. It's because Nokia doesn't play nice with the carrier pricing models. Most notably, they include Wi-Fi on their phones. Phone carriers in the US subsidize the price of the phones based on charging high rates for data. Wi-Fi enabled phones prevent them from doing that.

      I've noted this before on Slashdot and have been modded into oblivion by what are presumably Apple fanboys claiming it's the iPhone's interface that made it popular in the US. That may be true, but I still stand by what I said.
      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    4. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Guess what -- Nokia would love to play big in the US. It's no small secret that they can't because of the carriers here. Practically every phone sold in the US goes through carrier channels. And if the big carriers don't like Nokia's phones or don't think they will appeal to enough people, they're DOA, no matter how cool the phone is.

      So go complain to AT&T and T-Mobile. Seems like the only Nokia phones they actually want are low-end featureless ones. It would be awesome to see a phone like the N96 come to AT&T.

      Yes, more phones are coming to the U.S., but the rest of the world will have had them forever by the time we get them.

    5. Re:Great... by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In many other markets (Europe, Hong Kong to name the two that I am familiar with) it is also practice to heavily subsidise handsets. That is nothing new.

      And to further undermine your argument: isn't the iPhone also WiFi enabled? It was when I checked last. And since when is WiFi really an issue? Only since a few years at most, so that can't be a big reason of stopping operators to carry Nokia phones. Before, mobile data (certainly in the mobile backwaters of the US) was not much of an issue. SMS may be but WiFi is not an alternative for SMS.

      The iPhone is also not just popular in the USA, it is also in Hong Kong. The release of the 3G iPhone made front page(!!) of the main English language daily here! It's just a phone! Or at least I'd think so... Nokias are also widely available and popular here, so it's really not just the pricing model that does it.

      That said, it makes me wonder really why Nokia is so poorly available in the USA.

    6. Re:Great... by F34nor · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is simple. US carriers have entered into a devils bargain with the subsidized phones for contracts. The carriers demand control over their networks and more importantly will only carry phones that are bad enough that people will be desperate to upgrade them 2 years later. This has created a cadre of American mobile users who are more interested in initial capital cost rather than technical quality and low price service for the duration. Also because the 4 carriers (read not a free market) are terrified of free WiFi combined with VoIP. This means they will not carry phones that will support WiFi and VoIP. Iphone you think, um well they have locked down a BSD based phone so it cannot multitask for the simple reason they do not want a VoIP app resident in memory. In fact Skype has refused to release mobile versions because they "cannot guarantee quality of service over mobile networks." in a world with WiFi enabled phones this is a lie has illustrated by Fring et al.

      This comes to the basic fact that WiFi if implemented freely and openly (let alone WiMax) could be the end of mobile phone service for most metropolitan users. Imagine a world without channels in the spectrum just one open cloud from top to bottom, imagine multi-spectrum chipsets and antennas that could be peer to peer nodes relaying from phone to tower etc until it reaches the nearest fiber. Imagine each peer buying an selling service as needed from any other node on the network, each peer interaction based on a system of free market a micro payments for the bridging service. Once again oligopoly cripples technology for pricing.

    7. Re:Great... by ras · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have often read the Nokia engineer's whinge about how they make phones with tons of features, then the US carriers ask they all be removed. I presume the simply don't bother trying to sell phones in the US that require them to put a whole pile of effort into removing features.

      Apple is about to be bitten by the same thing, only in reverse. The DRM, the "thou shall not run applications in the background", the "thou shall only sell software through Apple" - all those things aren't consumer friendly. I presume its just Apple crippling their phones at fit in with the carriers wishes, just like Nokia has to do.

      Only there is one difference. Nokia doesn't sell crippled phones to the rest of the world, only to the US. Consequently, they dominate the world market. From what I can tell, Apple is going to try and sell their US crippled phone to the world. If so, they are in for a bit of a shock.

      I personally would buy an iPhone V2, if I could use it with a blue tooth keyboard and run applications on it just like I can with the Nokia. Nothing out of the ordinary - just things like download my pod-casts in the background over WiFi with my favourite 3rd party podcast app, run a GPS tracker in the background when bushwalking, a keyboard monitor - all pretty simple stuff really which works now on my Nokia. But I can't. Sort of kills it, really.

  7. Touch Screen != Success by imstanny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People and companies are attributing the success of the iPhone to its Touch technology. Yes, it was the first one to come out with it in a successful design, but the iPhone is succesful mainly because it capitalizes on Apple's software platforms. The iPhone brings together iTunes, iPod, & Telephone, and Web capabilities in a unified architecture that is based on OSX format. A Nokia or Blackberry with a touch screen will not be able to support anything remotely close to what Apple is offering. Yes, they will look similar and offer 'me-too' capabilities, but just b/c users can touch the screen and the phone can play music, doesn't mean it will be remotely competitive to the iPhone.

    1. Re:Touch Screen != Success by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's also worth mentioning that Motorola has had touchscreen phones literally for years (including Linux-based phones!) and they definitely don't have anything that's any threat to the iPhone.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Touch Screen != Success by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is not features but how easilly it is to use the existing ones. I had a samsung sync phone, A lot of features good battery and overall a good phone. But for me to access the calculator I needed to go to Apps->tools->next->Calculator. While it is a commonly used tool it is not as common as the other tools I have setup to be quicked accessed. On the iPhone I just press the calculator icon and I am there. Or I can rearainge the icons to be where I want them. It is actually a well designed phone while it may not have all the features that other phones have, it made my life a little easier.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Touch Screen != Success by Yer+Mum · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most wireless phones in the Nokia's N series beat the iPhone feature by feature, it's just that Nokia's marketing department in the US seems incapable of getting this across to anyone.

  8. Really? World's Thinnest QWERTY? by CrankyFool · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was wondering about this -- my Blackberry Curve (8310) doesn't actually feel like it's thicker than 1cm. So I looked it up -- it's 0.91cm thick (0.36"). How is the F71, if it really is 1cm thick, the world's thinnest?

  9. But by Skraut · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm still waiting for a company to come out with a Dvorak smartphone.

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:But by bloobloo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dvorak? Smart?

      Oh, the other one.

    2. Re:But by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      (actual keyboard changer/driver)
      http://nokia-9210-software.epocware.com/InterKey.html , it is very old but proves that it can be done on Symbian.

      http://www.soft32.com/download_159680.html
      "PopOnTop Keyboard 1.05
      Pop the keyboard on top at the click of a side button. Keyboard layouts from Qwerty to Dvorak, full screen or part, large keys or small, upright or sideways - even design your own!"

      I bet there are better solutions but it is really hard to find "Dvorak" in mobile phone thanks to that guy named Dvorak.

      That is the bonus of being able to install anything you like unlike some other device claims to be smart ;)

    3. Re:But by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's nothing. I'm still waiting for a smartphone that supports at least 3 flavors of IBM EBCDIC! Now get off of my lawn!

    4. Re:But by quizzicus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm still waiting for a company to come out with a Dvorak smartphone. You may say so now, but what will you do when the type bars in your smartphone jam? What then?
  10. Re:About that home screen switching... by athakur999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Symbian-based phones definitely have this capability, at least my 5 year old Nokia 6600 does. While in an application, I can hold down the "menu" button and it will show me task switcher that will let me go back to the menu and start another program without closing the first one and swap between them. I'm sure the limited memory of the phone will stop you at some point but I've had 4 or 5 applications running at once at times.

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  11. I've said it before and I'll say it again... by F34nor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been using the e61 for some time and it is fantastic. Wifi in a phone more than a year before the iPhone. The only thing it lacks is a tab key and it misses it badly. I just went phough phone buying hell for my father and got him a Centro (mostly becasue he is a technophobe who has had a palm, handspring, or treo for over ten years. ) I have been using the iPhone and a V3xx for the summer and all of them basically suck cock compaired to the e-series. Touch screen is cool but add no functionality for me and somewhat diminished typing experience. Oh had why the fuck doesn't the keyboard go to landscape in half the iPhone apps? Anyway none of you chumps will ever see this phone anyway becasue the US mobile phone companies are a ass licking oligarchy based on reduced function in returned for increased prices.

    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone

    1. Re:I've said it before and I'll say it again... by rokp · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can use Ctrl-I instead of TAB key on E61 (at least in putty).

  12. Looks good but... by thammoud · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Symbian is a really awful operating system. I had the E61 and it used to crash and freeze all the time. I thought it was the phone and then I bought the N95 and the freezing and crashing continued. I will never buy a Nokia again until they fix the OS.

    1. Re:Looks good but... by hirschma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The E61 sucks *with* the last released firmware, it just sucks less. They never did ship a fully stable device, and I see no evidence that they fixed the E61 issues in any successor devices. Again, no more Nokia for me.

      jh

    2. Re:Looks good but... by snarfies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? Because I've had an E61i for around six months now, and it has NEVER crashed or frozen, not even once.

      Mind you, there are 1) different versions of the Symbian OS, as well as different versions of S60 (the gui). The E61/E61i both use S60v3, dunno what version of Symbian OS is under that. I have pretty recent firmware though. Full stability, so far. Best phone I've ever owned.

  13. Re:Who the hell buys Nokia anymore in the USA? by Albanach · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let me guess, you own a Motorola?

  14. Just imagine... by Miladinoski · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... some stupid pick-pocketer comes to steal something from you and he sees the iPhone, and he'll say:
    Lol! An iPhone! An iPod a camera-phone and an internet communications device!!11!oneeleven so its a "must-have"!! He comes and steals your phone.

    ... some stupid pick-pocketer comes to steal something from you and he sees the Nokia E71, and he'll say:
    LOL! The slimmest phone with a QWERTY keyboard! The best fone evar!!one1 He comes and steals your phone.

    .. some stupid pick-pocketer comes to steal something from you and he sees the Nokia 7110, and he'll say:
    What a poor bastard. I'll give him my iPhone/Nokia E71 because he's god damn poor. He comes and give his phone to you.

    You choose with what are you going to come out on the streets!
    --
    [insert lame sig here]
  15. Insensitive Clod by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But I type with the Dvorak keymap, and I doubt those tiny keyboards are good for touch-typing. So I think I will have to go the route of "soft" keyboards (a la iPhone) if I ever go down the smartphone road.

  16. Re:Button Masher by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Having used similar devices with small keys and being 182cm tall myself, I can assure you that they are not a problem even for people with big stubby fingers.

    The trick is that the keys are not flat, but rounded on top and require a small but important amount of pressure and travel to operate. Thus the hard part of your thumb or finger can easily press the right key, and the soft flesh around it does not push the neighbours.

    It's a lot better than the iPhone interface (which is similar size "keys" but flat) and traditional predictive text because it doesn't rely on any kind of prediction or spell checking, so is much less prone to errors. You can also type non-dictionary and unusual words as easily as common ones, and not having to check if the phone picked the right word as you type speeds up the rate of entry and makes it easier to just think about the message rather than how you are entering it.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  17. Re:iPhone rival by outZider · · Score: 2

    Have you ever used S60? It's a fine mobile operating system and easy to use. I'm certainly optimistic about their touch interface.

    Also, you'll be able to tether your computer to it, will play audio over A2DP, allow non-Nokia authorized software to run on it, have an SDK that doesn't require a Mac... shall I continue?

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  18. Re:Which is it nokia? by LilWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You do realize that Nokia shipped 115.5 million phones just in the first quarter of 2008? 14.6 million of those were in what could be called the "smartphone" category. So something that sells 8-10 million in a time frame of a whole year doesn't really sound so astonishing to them.

  19. Re:Is the built in GPS a real GPS? by zyzko · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, the data sheet clearly states GPS and A-GPS (GPS assisted with tower data to get initial fix).

    Calling cell tower approximation (what Google Maps uses on phones with no real GPS) any kind of "GPS" would clearly be false advertising and just calling for trouble.

    This is not Nokias first GPS model either, they routinely seem to put GPS on their new models. What really interests me how good is it. If initial fix takes minutes it is basically useless for quick "was the address I'm going to on this block or the next one"-type of usage. N95 (at least the early firmwares, I'm not sure if the newer ones have A-GPS) was terrible in this respect and keeping the GPS always on was not an option either because of the increased battery drain.

  20. Re:It sure ain't no iPhone. by Cederic · · Score: 2, Informative


    Nice flame. You forgot to mention that the iPhone has only 5% of the worldwide smartphone market, and that represents only a small fraction of the mobile phone market.

    Is it a good phone? Sure. Is it a way better phone than anything Nokia sells? No.

    Are Nokia getting "a little desperate"? laugh.

    Nokia have three times the annual revenue that Apple do, and a similar profit margin. Apple should be thanking Nokia for the skill and talent they've employed to create a market for Apple to move into.

    I'm looking forward to seeing Nokia's offerings towards the end of the year. I'll also have a play with a new iPhone.

    You see, I do think differently, and better. I think beyond the shiny marketing message rammed down my throat.

  21. Re:Which is it nokia? by k_187 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yeah, nokia sells in a week what apple wants to sell in a year. This is why the iphone is not the major threat everybody thinks it is.

    --
    11 was a racehorse
    12 was 12
    1111 Race
    12112
  22. Re:Meh by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2

    If I had WiFi available everywhere I went, I'd get the N810 in a heartbeat, but I don't.

    I've no problems using Skype or a SIP softphone, but they're useless if I don't have a connection. I've got WiFi at home, WiFi at work, and several restaurants/bars here have WiFi (and even there, I'd have to ask for the key), but not everywhere.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  23. Not an iphone rival by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The thing is everyone thinks iphone==Touch screen. This is like saying iPod == simplified MP3 player with round dial.

    If you happen to catch the last apple keynote, then you know it's about the integration. some stats:

    >80% of iphone uses have used 10 or more applicaiton functions on their phone
    >95% use the internet and google says most of their mobile queries come from iphones.

    Now they are launching a app store for developers which will allow anyone to sell in 70 countries and apple handles all the delivery, installs, micro payments, currency conversio, and store UI languages.

    It's first year the ipod sold because it was cool to look at and hold. But it sold the next year because the iTunes and the Itumes Music store were so freakin easy use with it.

    Making a touch screen is not making an iphone. These companies have about exactly 1 year to figure this out before the apple app store has a lot of applications on it. After that it's too late.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Not an iphone rival by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not just the touchscreen is notable about the iPhone, though it's of course the most prolific feature of the device.
      What is truly making it success, includes:
      • It Just Works,
      • it doesn't crash (often),
      • it looks good,
      • it is easy to use,
      • and most of all: It Just Works.
      With that I summed it up mostly. Like many Apple devices, there is not much really innovative about it. They took existing tech, integrated it, made it work out of the box, made it work easily, made it look beautiful, and that's about it. But that's not easy to do: if so, many other companies would have done it.
      The iPod is a great example. It is tightly integrated with the iTunes application on the PC, and thus very very easy to copy music onto. It works very easily and intuitively: the scroll wheel that is not really turning but feeling your finger, a very intuitive way. Right turn moves up, left turn moves down, click to select. No more buttons needed. The beauty of simplicity.