Slashdot Mirror


Did NBC Alter the Olympics' Opening Ceremony?

techmuse writes "Viewing the 2008 Olympics opening ceremony online at NBC's Olympics website, you can see that the order in which the countries were presented was very different from the actual order of the countries in the ceremony, as listed at Wikipedia. NBC skipped roughly 100 countries ahead, then jumped back and forth, apparently delaying the appearance of the United States in its home market until later in the broadcast. (In fact, the US team was shown on the infield before they were shown marching!) NBC did not acknowledge this in its broadcast. Is NBC altering the reality of the broadcast to boost ratings? Was this true only online, or also in the live broadcast?"

128 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. This just in... by kcbanner · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...American media alters the truth to boost ratings!

    Movie at 11.

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
    1. Re:This just in... by r00b · · Score: 4, Funny

      the truth alters ratings to boost American media!

    2. Re:This just in... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Movie at 11.

      Movie at about 12mid/11pm CT on NBC affilitates tonight... due to Olympic runover. You just never know when those taped sporting events will end.

    3. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What major network television outfit publicly linked the American Antrax attacks falsely to Iraq back in 2001 and waited until 2006 to very quiet acknowledge (but not explain the source of) its deceit?

      Can boosting ratings, by feeding the American people false propaganda, be a treasonous offense?

    4. Re:This just in... by moxley · · Score: 4, Funny

      American mainstream media alters the truth for many reasons, one of them is to boost ratings...

      There..fixed that for ya.

    5. Re:This just in... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Never mind in 'Soviet Russia'. Try current Russia.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    6. Re:This just in... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wait -- that was ABC, who kept screaming at the top of their lungs about how the anthrax was linked to Iraq, had bentonite traced to Iraq, and how three or four highly credible sources had confirmed that it was produced in Iraq labs.
      And, to the best of my knowledge, they have never changed or recanted those allegations, even now that they're (along with everyone else) claiming that a single US-based scientist was actually the person who managed to produce, on his own, without access to the necessary equipment, weaponized anthrax that several FBI labs couldn't replicate given several years of effort.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    7. Re:This just in... by wooferhound · · Score: 4, Informative

      Olympic Events have always been rearranged when on a Tape delay, I expect it, and why not ?
      It is not even displayed in correct order when it's hosted in the USA.

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    8. Re:This just in... by JackieBrown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You set up the question just so you could answer, didn't you?

    9. Re:This just in... by emilng · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't tase him bro.

    10. Re:This just in... by Perf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not just American media...

      In fact, since most other countrys' media are government controlled, they probably do it more. Then they feed their stories into the international wires.

      Media bias??? What media bias? We don't create the news, we just splice, edit, and reword to make it sell better.

      NBC, CBS, ABC, AP, AFP, Reuters -- they're all selling purple Kool-aid.

      You don't believe everything the Bush Administration says?
      Good.
      Go apply the same skepticism to the media.

    11. Re:This just in... by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right, because the self-proclaimed sidestream media is such a paragon of truthiness. Fox News seems to think that fact checking is a payroll system.

    12. Re:This just in... by mutherhacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "in a democracy they are different lies."

      Democracy? Nowadays democracy I'm afraid isnt working as it should be and it's all because of the media. It's turned more towards demagogy. People vote based on opinions formed by tv and the media. They dont even bother to see the candidates' plan.

    13. Re:This just in... by nascarguy27 · · Score: 5, Informative
      If you had watched the actual broadcast on your local NBC affiliate, and then watched the online version, as I did, you would see that NBC screwed up while putting up the parade online. The segments between "commercial breaks", as in the content segments, were placed online out of the order they were originally broadcast in. That's why it appears not in order online.

      viewing the 2008 Olympics opening ceremony online at NBC's Olympics website, you can see that the order in which the countries were presented was very different from the actual order of the countries in the ceremony, as listed at Wikipedia. NBC skipped roughly 100 countries ahead, then jumped back and forth, apparently delaying the appearance of the United States in its home market until later in the broadcast. (In fact, the US team was shown on the infield before they were shown marching!) NBC did not acknowledge this in its broadcast. Is NBC altering the reality of the broadcast to boost ratings? Was this true only online, or also in the live broadcast?"

      emphasis mine

      To sum up NBC's 12 hour tape-delayed broadcast was in order, while the online version was shown out of order either due to NBC wanting it like that or, more likely, whoever put the parade online didn't pay attention as he/she was supposed to.

      --
      Funny createSig(Witty remark, Odd reference)
      {
      return (Funny)remark + (Funny)reference;
      }
    14. Re:This just in... by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I consider the idea of "mainstream media" pure BS. It might mean something if it was coming from some actual fringe journalists. But it mostly comes from right wing journalists with a huge following, who build up this whole mythology of the "Liberal Elite" conspiring to screw over the U.S., with outlets like the NY Times as their media lapdogs. They "prove" by jumping on every real or supposed lapse in accuracy they can find, while being damned careless about their own fact checking.

    15. Re:This just in... by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is why I watch FOX. At least they are objective.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    16. Re:This just in... by uberphear · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Probably; it's a potent and well-known rhetorical device called anthypophora.

    17. Re:This just in... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is not even displayed in correct order when it's hosted in the USA.

      In Canada it was displayed in the correct order: Greece first, followed by the countries in the order they would appear in a Chinese dictionary. You can't really talk about alphabetical order since Mandarin use ideograms, not letters, thus the order is based on the rule of strokes.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    18. Re:This just in... by nine-times · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems like it's one thing to rearrange Olympic Events in order to show the popular Events in prime-time. It's another to edit and reorder the events (little 'e') within a given Olympic Event. Like is it ok to rearrange the order of appearance in one of the gynastics events because you think it will make for better TV? If so, would it be ok for NBC to edit a basketball game so it looks like there are more baskets made toward the end of the game, in order to make it all more exciting?

      Seems to me like it's just an issue of where you draw the line. Obviously a certain level of editing would be unacceptable.

    19. Re:This just in... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But it mostly comes from right wing journalists with a huge following, who build up this whole mythology of the "Liberal Elite" conspiring to screw over the U.S., with outlets like the NY Times as their media lapdogs.

      I don't know about that. I see the term most often used by bloggers who want to deride sources of information that are considered more reliable than their own weblog.

      But then I also see it being used (I think validly) as a means of lumping together the, what, 4 media companies who own every piece of music, every movie, and every television station. I mean, think about that for a second. Most of what you see and hear is being controlled and pushed on you by 4 companies. There has been evidence that these companies collude and work together. They fund the news and the art that shapes our culture, and they don't fund things that they perceive as endangering their business interests.

      It's not about right-wing or left-wing. It's about money. There's a lot of money being put into the NY Times, FOX News, ABC News, etc. And that money isn't being put into those organizations out of altruism, it's being put in to make money and protect their other business interests.

    20. Re:This just in... by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was behind the scenes at the Olympics in 1996 at the boxing venue and I was amazed at how mediocre the average Boxer is! Seriously most of them would be as likely to get asses kicked out on the street as any of us, i was amazed some of them didn't get their heads handed to them. I actually had to escort a Moroccan Boxer out of the building because he was smoking after he lost his match! Anything you see on the television has been hand-picked by the network and shot by the media-pool feed. The Boxing had matches going 12 hours a day for a week and the networks worked in shifts. Some of my guys got put in the ring to shadow-box so the crews could practice before the event started.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    21. Re:This just in... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...American media alters the truth to boost ratings!
      Movie at 11.

      Boosting ratings doesn't explain why CBS News edited its interview with McCain a few weeks ago. He came up with a goofy answer to some question and they rearranged the footage, splicing in his answer to some other question, in an attempt to make him appear to be less of an idiot. What was aired didn't match the transcript. Maybe next time they'll edit the transcript too.

      After that, I find this NBC-Olympics story unimpressive. NBC messed with footage of the Olympics? Who cares?

  2. kids today... by clang_jangle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is NBC altering the reality of the broadcast to boost ratings?

    Excuse me, are you serious? It's television , FFS! They edit, it's normal. Been going on since at least the 1950s.

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:kids today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this is how american stories go:
      1.something shocking to the public happens
      2.half the people complain but do nothing, and the other half laugh at the other half because they knew this was going on for a while and didn't do anything and still won't do anything
      3.people forget about the shocking story until they are reminded again of it

    2. Re:kids today... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Excuse me, are you serious? It's television , FFS! They edit, it's normal. Been going on since at least the 1950s.

      This isn't the Dukes of Hazard or even Survivor. This is the Olympics. It's presented as news of the world's supposed ultimate sporting event.

      Of course, the cynical among us will note that the psudo-intellectual wrappings of competition and the human condition are just dressing to sell the product. We know this really isn't news but entertainment and that the competition comes a distant third to politics and money. We can all sit around and posture about how we expect this kind of thing. But you don't get an award for being jaded.

    3. Re:kids today... by tm2b · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's presented as news of the world's supposed ultimate sporting event.

      And thus, it's still entertainment.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    4. Re:kids today... by mikael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the problem:

      (1) Country A attacks Country B
      (2) Country B launches a retaliatory strike against country A
      (3) Country C forms an alliance with country A
      (4) Countries D, E and F send supples to country B.

      Of course, the order of events in the news is only trivial.

      Sequence (1,2,3,4) is no different from sequence (4,1,2,3)

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:kids today... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Informative

      you don't get an award for being jaded.

      Actually, you do.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    6. Re:kids today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Of course, the order of events in the news is only trivial.

      Yeah, right! Next you'll be telling me Iraq went something like this:

      (1) U.S. troops invaded Iraq and overthrew the governement
      (3) Iraqis attacked U.S. troops

      Oh, wait...

    7. Re:kids today... by flanksteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. It was tape-delayed. They can do whatever the hell they want. They always have with stuff like this. Why is it a big deal? Did someone lose money on the order the countries entered the stadium? Let it go people.

    8. Re:kids today... by snaildarter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hear you loud and clear... Facts don't matter when reporting news. I disagree with you, but you probably represent the majority of Americans. I find that depressing.

      --
      Japanese scientist: Technically, sir, tomatoes are fags. Military scientist: He means fruits.
    9. Re:kids today... by truesaer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How in gods name did people get the impression that this was a news? It called the opening ceremony. It is entertainment. News shows do not typically feature fireworks, dance performances, hundreds of syncronized drummers, a man on a cable running through the air to light a giant torch, or any of the rest of the ceremony. Because, it was a ceremony for the purpose of entertaining us.

  3. Last Post!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last Post!!!!

    1. Re:Last Post!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      first post in UK, 29th post in USA!

    2. Re:Last Post!!! by ADRenalyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      I actually posted first, but because I am in Beijing, so you Americans won't see my comment until about noon tomorrow.

    3. Re:Last Post!!! by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, they saw it earlier because Slashdot rearranged the order of the comments on the tape...

  4. What web Broadcast? by jackb_guppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you are not Windows or Mac, there is no web broadcast.

    Gets me thinking, how did a Slashdoter view the web broadcast... Is someone using Windows?

    1. Re:What web Broadcast? by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Funny

      They are probably some WINE developer who is using the API for Windows 7 to view it

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  5. NBC alters the Olympics... by vigmeister · · Score: 3, Funny

    to further nationalistic propaganda. All the medals won by Americans in the past were all actually made of tin. All the better to make hats with!

    Cheers!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  6. Not news. by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been a tradition in Olympic broadcasts for years. It's called editing.

    1. Re:Not news. by telso · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, editing is not an Olympic broadcasting tradition; it's an NBC Olympic broadcasting tradition. Most Olympic networks show as much as they can live, and only show events tape-delayed when there are two events worth watching at the same time (or they're showing recaps when it's night time where the Olympics are).

      NBC, on the other hand, instead of showing one of the most exciting opening ceremonies ever, decided to show The Today Show and, in my area, local news (apparently some loser got arrested for a domestic assault!).

      Sadly, this is not news either. Which is why most Americans who live on the Canadian border watch the Olympics on CBC.

    2. Re:Not news. by quacking+duck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      CBC (Canada's approved Olympic broadcaster) not only showed it live, they also did an encore presentation starting at 6 pm.

      They replayed the whole thing--all 4+ hours, no editing that I noticed. The only thing different in the encore were occasional live programming notes, and abbreviated (10-minute) news broadcasts at 6 and 10.

      Why did NBC feel the need to so obviously edit their repeat?

    3. Re:Not news. by Torontoman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is blatantly obvious to us Canadians when we have the choice of watching CBC or a US station... We watch the CBC live (whenever it happens to be...) and with 'low level editing' - and just sort of laugh at the US version which is in prime time and so altered it is just awful. The CBC primetime event is an exact copy of the live event. (Probably because it's cheaper just to hit play and not to edit...)

    4. Re:Not news. by yuna49 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sadly, American sports commentators have been told that "dead air" is absolutely the worst possible thing that could happen during a telecast. I don't really know why this has become the norm in the US. Dead air was obviously anathema to radio, but with television it makes little sense. Other countries' networks seem perfectly happy simply to show the events unfold on screen with an occasional comment from the announcers. I have to assume the American practice shows how little regard the producers have for their viewers, since the producers appear to believe we cannot fathom what we see on screen without the comments of some retired athlete to guide us.

    5. Re:Not news. by Teancum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This isn't even really an "American practice", as the "American Broadcasting Company" (ABC) didn't have nearly so much commentary when they were the "host network" of the Olympics prior to NBC's coverage.

      Some of the "color" commentary is IMHO acceptable during actual sporting events, but not for the opening and closing ceremonies. I usually just scream at my television trying to tell the stupid "hosts" to shut up so I can listen to what is being said during the ceremony itself.... knowing that all that does is piss off my wife.

      I think some of this also has to do with the outrageous salaries that some of these commentators are earning during the Olympics, and that NBC is hoping to get these "anchors" to earn their money. Top anchors like Bob Costas get several million dollars just to be there.

    6. Re:Not news. by Translation+Error · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to assume the American practice shows how little regard the producers have for their viewers, since the producers appear to believe we cannot fathom what we see on screen without the comments of some retired athlete to guide us.

      The fact that almost all comedies have laugh tracks didn't give this away?

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  7. Other countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi:

    I thought only America was in the Olympics. When did they start letting other countries participate?

    1. Re:Other countries? by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Funny

      The other countries are kinda like the Washington Generals, we just need them there so America can show of their skills.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:Other countries? by Minwee · · Score: 5, Informative

      I thought only America was in the World Series. When did they start letting other countries participate?

      There we go, fixed it for you.

      Since you asked, it was in 1969. However it wasn't until 1992 that a clearly superior team from another country was allowed to win.

      They then won again in 1993, and the 1994 World Series was canceled when it looked like a foreign team was going to win for the third time in a row and the US teams refused to play unless the rules were changed in their favour.

      Now you know.

    3. Re:Other countries? by breser · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nice revisionist history. The players went on strike because the owners wanted a salary cap. It had nothing to do with the Montreal Expos. Though it is true that the strike pretty much destroyed the Expos.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Major_League_Baseball_strike

  8. olypics video tech by drDugan · · Score: 5, Informative

    I looked yesterday for where I could watch Olypics videos. Looks like I needed to instal some plugin from Microsoft that only works with "approved" browsers. Silverlight?

    I don't even mind if I'm bombarded with ads to see video. I would even pay for certain footage of one person I know competing in Beijing and some of the events. But a Microsoft player? No thanks.

    1. Re:olypics video tech by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's no such thing as a television network that operates worldwide, so Olympic rights are sold on a country by country basis. Web video rights go to the TV network that owns the rights for the nation, and they have a right to lock other web videos out and responsiblity to keep their web videos within their borders. Sorry, no open media formats allowed, NBC had to go with something DRMed and they're already friendly with Microsoft, so it's no surprise NBCOlympics.com requires Sliverlight.

    2. Re:olypics video tech by skyshard · · Score: 3, Informative

      using firefox on a mac here, and i was able to use the player at http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/index.html fine after installing silverlight...

    3. Re:olypics video tech by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Two questions for you:

      Why should the IOC do something that would devalue what it produces? The Olympics are run on a shoestring budget compared to other "profitable" sports.

      Why don't you care about the Winter Olympics in 2010?

    4. Re:olypics video tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct. I bet you missed to follow the extended how-to:

      1. Install qemu
      2. Setup a VM using one of those useless CD's that come with some computers -- no, not the AOL ones, the Windows ones. You didn't trash them out, did ya?
      3. Run the VM
      4. Install Silverlight
      5. ...
      6. Profit
    5. Re:olypics video tech by tiffany98121 · · Score: 2, Informative

      how about a non-microsoft silverlight player then? http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight

    6. Re:olypics video tech by drDugan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      hate them? no. An individual's emotional response to a company doesn't do shit. They followed the rules of US capitalism with ruthless and unprincipled efficiency. For that, I kind of admire their dedication to an ideal, even if I dont agree with their behavior.

      However, I've seen their actions and I know what they have done - to individuals, to companies, to the computer industry and to innovation in general. The actions the company has taken and continues to take have lead me to be a vocal and outspoken opponent of any product that bears the name, every partnership that involves them, and every business venture they are involved with.

      You can attack that point of view, call me names from behind your AC shield, and act childish all you want. The word is not "fanaticism" - the one you have to understand is "accountability". Many in the US seem to have lost this concept in the last 10 years or so. Choosing to not to do business with them was easy and happened long ago. Microsoft has gone so much farther, and there is nothing they could do, short of a complete breakup of the company plus new management that would open my mind to trusting them.

  9. dilemma by matushorvath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I don't know whether to boycott the Olympic Games because of China ignoring human rights or because it was converted to a festival of commerce. If it goes on like this, I may be soon able to boycott each day of Olympics for a different reason.

    1. Re:dilemma by lp.sresu · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's even more commercial if you watch it on NBC. I swear if one of the athletes so much as coughs they go to commercial. "Fuck seeing the games, here are more inspiring ads from our sponsors!"

    2. Re:dilemma by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Now I don't know whether to boycott the Olympic Games because of Germany mistreating the Jews, or because it was converted to a festival of commerce. If it goes on like this, I may be soon able to boycott each day of Olympics for a different reason.

      Fixed that for you, or at least set the wayback machine to the 1930's. Not to 'Godwin's Law' myself here, but the problem of countries hosting the games to boost their prestige and defuse civil rights abuse is an old one. And the problem of commercialization, given the disasters of the Australia games, isn't exactly new, either.

    3. Re:dilemma by matushorvath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In fact, I think you are right. I can probably find a separate reason to boycott each day of the Games even now. Doping, commercialization, the new swimsuit controversy, human rights, Tibet, Avery Brundage reaction to Munich attacks, bribes deciding who will host the games, Moscow and L.A. "half-games"... and of course also the Berlin propaganda games (remember, you broke the law first ;)

    4. Re:dilemma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've decided to boycott Linux because the Finns are killing whales, many of whom are smarter than Linus Torvalds.

  10. Re:not a real issue by tinycorkscrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you had RTFA, you would know that's not the issue raised by the submitter. The question isn't how the countries were ordered, it is whether NBC's broadcast actually showed the countries in that order.

  11. Re:not a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "make something up" like apply 3000 year old rules, accepted by all for ordering countries in Mandarin?

  12. What is more outrageous... by aralin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... is that I have to actually subscribe to some local TV provider like AT&T, even if I don't own a TV, just so I could watch the NBC Olympics. There is no option for saying I don't have a TV service and to pay the sum they would receive from the local cable company directly to NBC. That is seriously outrageous.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    1. Re:What is more outrageous... by zsazsa · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's keeping you from just picking a provider from the list that they give you? I just picked the first one in the list (AT&T Broadband) and it let me in and watch the online version of the parade of nations.

    2. Re:What is more outrageous... by aralin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Honesty, not wanting to steal something I did not pay for and US Laws. Unauthorized access to NBC systems. I hope you read the terms of their service? There are recent precedents....

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    3. Re:What is more outrageous... by Corbets · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was modded insightful, but I hoped it was meant to be funny, till I read your response.

      What is it with people today that believe they should be able to receive anything they want in any form they want it without taking into account economic realities? I would imagine NBC has little desire at the moment to provide micro-managed services to each little joe and dick when they can sell in bulk directly to a few large providers instead.

      Perhaps in the future that infrastructure will exist; maybe you can even make some money pitching the idea to NBC. But to bitch that something you want doesn't exist is just asinine.

  13. Re:YOUR GAY by Endo13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    your gay and youe a newb your gay and youe a newb

    Translation:

    "Translate Server Error."

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  14. Re:not a real issue by fmobus · · Score: 5, Informative
    You sure? Wikipedia says they do have a standard collation:

    All other nations marched in name order in the language of the host nation, which in this case is the Chinese language. The collation method used is based on the names as written in Simplified Chinese characters and is similar to that used in Chinese dictionaries. The names were sorted by the number of strokes in the first character of the name, then by the total number of strokes in each subsequent character.

    So no, they didn't make anything up.

  15. Broadcast version not altered by zsazsa · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just did a quick check of the recording of the live broadcast that I made. In every spot I checked, the order given on the Wikipedia pages matches the one in the broadcast. So, at least in the case of the broadcasted version, the ordering matches up.

    1. Re:Broadcast version not altered by zsazsa · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ok, I just checked the online version... and it's totally mixed up and out of order. It's definitely not the correct order as seen in the broadcast version.

    2. Re:Broadcast version not altered by markybob · · Score: 2, Informative

      this is correct. the live broadcast was not altered

    3. Re:Broadcast version not altered by zsazsa · · Score: 4, Informative

      The order in the Wikipedia article (Chinese stroke count order) has been that way since August 1st.

    4. Re:Broadcast version not altered by barzok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "live broadcast" was not live.

    5. Re:Broadcast version not altered by deadmantyping · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you had seen the broadcast you would know why the countries are in that order. They said that China ordered based on the number of brush strokes of the first character in the simplified Chinese representing the country's name. I watched the entire thing last night following along with the list with the names written in Chinese and the only editing they did was to fit in commercial breaks and all they did there was do a quick recap of the countries that went past during the break. This is a non-story.

  16. Re:not a real issue by techmuse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I did, in fact, watch the entire broadcast. The countries were not broadcast in that order. You can find the order in which they actually marched in the wikipedia page. The issue here is that NBC appears to have altered the order of the events themselves. This is different from editing out bits to fit in commercials. The *story* has changed. Example:

    1) You get out of your car and walk into a store.
    2) You pull up to the store in your car
    3) You leave your house and get into your car
    4) You drive to the store
    5) You leave the store with your purchase.

    The correct order is 3,4,2,1,5, but the story told about what you did gives the impression that something very different happened.

  17. Re:not a real issue by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like a Quentin Tarnetino flick.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  18. Oh my, you mean you can't believe what's on tv? by dstates · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh my, oh my. You mean the TV companies alter reality for marketing purposes? I am shocked.

    All those yellow lines that magically appear and disappear on the football fields?

    All those "billboards" that are not really there on the stadium wall?

    I bet those starlets are even where padded bras. Do you think that they might even have had surgery. Goodness gracious, I wonder if Barbara Walters uses botox?

    And those wrestlers. Do you think that they might be using steroids?

    I am shocked. Shocked, I tell you.

    Actually, the MSNBC online video let's you pick what you want to see and caries a lot of obscure sports from end to end. Much better than listening to Pierre Salinger babble on about wine tasting in all the French villages while you are waiting to see actual athletes.

    --
    Statesman
  19. NBC Censors Olympics to Americans by BanjoBob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NBC has done an excellent job of insuring that Americans cannot watch the Olympics, the Opening Ceremony and other aspects of what is going on in China. They are the first to bitch and moan about China censorship and just look at what they're doing now! Typical media.

    They don't have cable out here so watching anything on the Internet from NBC is just not possible. They have effectively censored millions of Americans from watching the Olympics.

    What they do have has been cut up and altered to make room for all that advertising. And, just how many times do I have to hear "Ra Deem Team" from NBC. If I hear it again, I'm going to puke!

    Now, there are plenty of NON-AMERICAN web sites with the streams and videos! China has some, Germany has one, and there are others. You get the point... AVOID NBC and you can watch for free!

    --
    Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
    1. Re:NBC Censors Olympics to Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to agree. But the real story isn't just the parade of nations order.

      I watched the NBC version during US prime time, and then downloaded the ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corp) HDTV version without any adverts and watched it today on a tip from a friend online.

      You will be simply stunned at how much more of the ceremonies (easily HALF of the stadium performances were edited out by NBC) there really was, as well as the abbreviated parade of nations, presenters, even just fireworks displays over Beijing.

      Not only does NBC insult the viewer by editing out a large portion of what most really wanted to watch (the artistic presentations) but they insult China and the countries participating by making their own version of events and expecting us to swallow it between sappy commercials.

  20. OMGWTF!?!?! by Shihar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Guess, take a breath. Yes, NBC altered the video. They do the same thing when you see movies. They take your beloved movie and ALTER IT!!!!!! They do this to squish down time and show more things.

    Now, before we freak out shit out and panic that they are hiding something from you, realize that this stuff is filmed by more cameras then you can even begin to contemplate AND is filled with people from all around the world to serve as witnesses. What does this mean? It is really frigging unlikely that NBC is hiding "the truth" from you. Far more likely, they are trying to shrink a 4+ hour opening ceremony into something that will better fit their schedule.

    Worrying that they some how were altering the live feed is so dumb and inane that I can't even respond. People, take a frigging collective deep breath.

    1. Re:OMGWTF!?!?! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh really? And for just how many movies do they alter the timeline of events? Maybe the cable companies have the ability to edit for time, but I doubt they get to rearrange the movie because it alters the story. Imagine if we could just alter the timeline of history so that whenever there is a dispute, an international incident, a war, it was shown to be the other guy who started it? Altering the sequence of events is changing the truth.

      P.S. Hans shot first.

    2. Re:OMGWTF!?!?! by Kredal · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Momento" sure made a lot more sense when it was shown on NBC!

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    3. Re:OMGWTF!?!?! by the+phantom · · Score: 3, Funny

      Han shot before Hans.

  21. who got sick of the constant zooming on each scene by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was some incredible scenes to see but NBC camera people must have been told to zoom every camera and it diminished the quality IMO. The designers didn't create the imagery for moving viewers or moving cameras/lenses.

    It really became an annoyance and a disappointment.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  22. NBC is the WORST network for sports by acvh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dick Ebersole, who runs NBC Sports, is on record as saying that it is his goal to get better ratings, no matter what. That's why NBC doesn't post the running score of a football game, because they want you to stay and wait for it.

    It's why they show all those personal profiles instead of sporting events. It's why they edited the opening games. It's why we can't see live events in the US.

    1. Re:NBC is the WORST network for sports by geoff2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dick Ebersole, who runs NBC Sports, is on record as saying that it is his goal to get better ratings, no matter what. That's why NBC doesn't post the running score of a football game, because they want you to stay and wait for it.

      Have you ever watched an NBC broadcast of a football game? They show the score of a game the entire time.

    2. Re:NBC is the WORST network for sports by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice 1994 post. Ever since Sunday Night Football moved to NBC, there's been a running score line at the bottom.

  23. Re:not a real issue by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would have assumed that since French is the official language of the modern olympic games, they would have used that for the alphabetical ordering of the countries...

  24. AAAGGGHHH! by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Funny

    ***We all point at you and shriek like Donald Sutherland in Invasion of the Body Snatchers***

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  25. Re:not a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    They always use the name collating system native to the hosting nation to create an ascending list.

  26. Specifics? by geoff2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I watched NBC's broadcast on TV of the opening ceremonies and followed along with the Wikipedia list for a bit (at least, the Wikipedia list as it appeared last night) from Great Britain to the United States, and they matched perfectly. I've still got it on my DVR, and if someone can give an actual example of this reordering besides linking to the NBC olympics website (not even the opening ceremony video), I can check it out, but otherwise this objection is ridiculous. A little specificity would be helpful.

  27. Re:not a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah but more entertaining & original.

  28. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by p0tat03 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is more than a bunch of athletes my friend. Go back and watch the opening ceremonies, and tell me that country does not scare the fuck out of you. The level of discipline demonstrated by the performers, the sheer precision of it all... it all far exceeds anything the West could possibly pull off. And that's DAMNED scary.

    China is living proof that, if not bound by troublesome concepts like fairness, freedom, and morality, you can achieve great things. That scares the bejesus out of me. The entire Olympic exercise, for China at least, is one of intimidation. Here's them flexing their muscle, showing the world that, at a moment's notice, they can throw away billions, not feel the pinch, mobilize hundreds of thousands of people without any messy bureaucracy, and completely transform the entire city nearly overnight (well, 6 years, that's damned short).

  29. Re:not a real issue by multisync · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would have assumed that since French is the official language of the modern olympic games, they would have used that for the alphabetical ordering of the countries...

    French is one of the official languages. According to the Olympic Charter, "The official languages of the IOC are French and English." But the convention apparently is to introduce countries in alphabetical order in the language of the host country.

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  30. Re:not a real issue by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most Chinese dictionaries actually sort characters first by the radical and then by stoke count within each group of radicals. I'm curious why they used just the stroke count ordering for the Olympics.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  31. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by speedlaw · · Score: 2

    I too noted the subtext of the opening ceremonies. We're here, we are powerful, and we are co-ordinated. The fact that the only soldiers were as flag honor guards didn't slow this up one iota. Only the fact that we are trading partners saves us from a US/USSR situation. OK, we buy their stuff, they rip off all of our ideas sent over, and they buy up our bonds. Still, this was a monument to socialist style propaganda, and it worked...very well. Always remember that this is a long lived contiguous society, who regards the west as...savages.

  32. Re:Did anyone else see by Swampash · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is how the Commander-in-Chief behaves in front of the world.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZ_YhM4OGkU

  33. Re:not a real issue by carlzum · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would just lead to a rash of countries with names like A One Republic and AAA Reliable Nation (well, probably in the French equivalent).

  34. Not the most disrespectful behaviour. by MagdJTK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While NBC may well have done what they are accused of (I wouldn't know, the BBC had it all live and unedited), it's not the most insulting thing they've done.

    They bribed the Chinese organisers of the Olympics to put certain events early in the morning (local time). The swimming starting soon is an example. Why? So they would be during prime time in America. This sound fair enough, until you realise that prime time in America is THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT IN EUROPE. So we get to miss half the events, just so it's a little more convenient for the Yanks. I mean, it's not like we invented the Olympics or anything...

    1. Re:Not the most disrespectful behaviour. by MmmmAqua · · Score: 4, Funny

      I mean, it's not like we invented the Olympics or anything...

      I didn't realize that the UK had such a big hand molding the games in ancient Greece. Thanks for clearing that up! I didn't know that!

      -Just another stupid American
      (tongue firmly in cheek, for the humor impaired)

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
  35. Re:not a real issue by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except in this case it doesn't give the impression that something very different happened since aside from the first and last countries the order that nations appear in the parade has no significance. Still it's a pretty stupid thing to change.

    More important to me is that they put ads over the performances in the opening ceremony so we really did not get to see the full performance how it was intended.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  36. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by p0tat03 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing that really hit me was how quickly they were able to expand their airport to accommodate for the Olympics. They now have the world's largest airport terminal, built up in almost no time at all. My home town (Vancouver, Canada) took nearly 20 years to build a single runway, between budget cutbacks, protests by residents, regulatory red tape, etc etc. Meanwhile here's a country that can completely rebuild an airport, make it into the world's largest, and still have time to make it an architectural masterpiece, all in 6 years. It's breathtaking and scary.

    who regards the west as...savages.

    Not really, they regard the West as hypocrites. The state media likes to play up images like Abu Ghraib and the various things going on at Gitmo. It's not entirely baseless, and that's the sad part.

  37. Remember Atlanta? by furry_wookie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed the IOC threw an absolute fit over the use of Army Rangers for some portions of the opening ceremonies in Atlanta in 1996. (They pleaded for the Rangers to not perform their contribution in uniform. They didn't.)

    But I don't think the guys who raised the Olympic flag while GOOSE-STEPPING in China were members of the local Beijing Boy Scout troop.

    Fucking IOC Hypocrites.

    --
    -- Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventualy invent UNIX.
  38. Joys of a Delayed Broadcast by grantdh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like the did stuff around with the order the teams marched in. They certainly had enough time to do it - it was delayed half a day from when it really happened.

    Opening ceremony was at 8pm on the 8th of August 2008 (Chinese like 8 - it's a lucky number :) and Beijing is at GMT+8. Some of the folks here in Melbourne, Australia were watching it that night live (about 10pm onwards local time). Based on the twitter feeds from those in the USA who were tweeting what they saw, it looked like they were watching it around 8pm on the 8th in THEIR time zone. Somewhat impossible, no?

    I'm already hearing reports of US swimmers being coached to refer to the time of their race in US broadcast time rather than Beijing time. Ummmmmm - WTF?

    So yeah, if you've got HOURS between recording the event and showing it then making any changes you want is a piece of cake.

    --

    I left my body to science, but I'm afraid they've turned it down...
  39. Mr. Godwin please pick up the red courtesy phone. by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Indeed. I believe the practice started with the 1936 Berlin Olympics when the German newsreels showed only negatives of all of the track and field events, so that a white Jesse Owens could be seen beating the pants off of all the black athletes.

  40. Re:not a real issue by Andraax · · Score: 5, Informative

    I did, in fact, watch the entire broadcast. The countries were not broadcast in that order.

    I watched the entire broadcast (TiVo'd it) and was so impressed, I stayed up until 4am and watched it all over again. While I don't have the countries memorized in the order they appeared, but from what I do remember, it seems about the same as on the Wikipedia article. The US came in about 2/3 of the way down the list in the broadcast and they're #139 of 204 in Wikipedia (or roughly 2/3 of the way down the list).

    I did notice that a number of small countries got very short screen times and seemed "clipped", so I guess they edited out some content to shorten up the whole thing.

  41. They ALTERED the CROWD NOISE too. by furry_wookie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to friends in Europe, who watched the ceremonies live NBC totally used FAKE CROWD noise.

    Apparently Vladimir Putin from Russia got the biggest crowd applause all night when they showed him on the big screen, and the Iraq athletes were given loud BOO's.

    And all we heard all night long were the exact same levels of 'monotone cheering' on the NBC broadcast.

    Don't believe ANYTHING you see on TV, especially if they had 12 hours to make changes,edits,lies.

    --
    -- Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventualy invent UNIX.
    1. Re:They ALTERED the CROWD NOISE too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your tinfoil hat is a bit tight there buddy. I watched the NBC West Coast Broadcast, and the crowd was far from monotonous. They cheered at all the countries you would expect the Chinese to cheer at. I think your European friends are having a laugh at your expense.

      FWIW, I was following the NBC West Coast broadcast while looking at the order on Wikipedia (so I could take bathroom breaks without missing countries I care about), and it seemed to be following it spot on.

    2. Re:They ALTERED the CROWD NOISE too. by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apparently Vladimir Putin from Russia got the biggest crowd applause all night when they showed him on the big screen, and the Iraq athletes were given loud BOO's.

      Apparently, someone didn't notice that Iraq was barred from participating in the Olympics this year.

  42. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is more than a bunch of athletes my friend. Go back and watch the opening ceremonies, and tell me that country does not scare the fuck out of you. The level of discipline demonstrated by the performers, the sheer precision of it all... it all far exceeds anything the West could possibly pull off. And that's DAMNED scary.

    Yeah, they even beat the West in terms of carrying flags upside down. At least when the Americans carried a flag upside-down, it was a Canadian flag. That little runt of a kid they pulled out of the earthquake was carrying his own country's flag upside-down.

    The only part of the ceremony that scared the fuck out of me was that nobody dared mention it on air, nor did anyone in the Chinese parade dare swap the kid's flag for one that was right-side-up.

    An upside-down flag is an international signal of distress. In context of a political display, that kid was basically saying "My government hasn't even begun to help rebuild my village after the earthquake".

    Precision? Discipline? Someone should have at seen a fuckup like an upside-down flag (your own flag, on the two most visible representatives of your country in the entire stadium) before the kid got into the arena. Comical.

    The entire Olympic exercise, for China at least, is one of intimidation. Here's them flexing their muscle, showing the world that, at a moment's notice, they can throw away billions, not feel the pinch, mobilize hundreds of thousands of people without any messy bureaucracy, and completely transform the entire city nearly overnight (well, 6 years, that's damned short).

    ...but are so beholden to authority that not one person on the ground decided to fix the kid's flag. Everyone either pretended not to see it, or assumed that someone higher-up had decreed that the kid's flag was supposed to be upside-down, and were too scared to hand the kid a flag that was right-side up.

    There's a message in there about Chinese culture, too, and I don't think it was the one they wanted to send.

  43. Re:not a real issue by SwiftWing2002 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The part where you pay at the cashier must have been edited out to make room for a commercial.

  44. Re:not a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But then he wouldn't have gotten the chance to be a wordy, condescending asshole, and that wouldn't be Slashdot.

  45. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One thing that really hit me was how quickly they were able to expand their airport to accommodate for the Olympics. They now have the world's largest airport terminal, built up in almost no time at all. My home town (Vancouver, Canada) took nearly 20 years to build a single runway, between budget cutbacks, protests by residents, regulatory red tape, etc etc. Meanwhile here's a country that can completely rebuild an airport, make it into the world's largest, and still have time to make it an architectural masterpiece, all in 6 years. It's breathtaking and scary.

    Before you all fall over yourself, it's entirely possible to do something of the like in the West too - when it matters enough. The Gemini/Mecury/Apollo programs in the 1960s for example, things got done when you're on the clock and national pride is in the balance. It's just rather hard to get that kind of support going...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  46. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by servognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who the fuck cares about the Olympics?

    Everybody should, it's one of the battlefields for Cold Wars. Countries with nukes can't fight each other directly, but they can use the world stage for cultural fights. They show off their achievements to intimidate and convince people their way is superior.
    This year's Olympics are China's version of the moon landing

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  47. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by p0tat03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's just rather hard to get that kind of support going...

    Damn right, especially these days, where the lack of the fear of communism has made driving these massive projects impossible. The problem is that the West requires consensus (or at least something resembling it) to do anything of that scale. China just has to have one guy snap his fingers.

    Absolute power, when wielded by someone who knows how to use it, is very, very dangerous for his neighbours.

  48. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Meanwhile here's a country that can completely rebuild an airport, make it into the world's largest, and still have time to make it an architectural masterpiece, all in 6 years. It's breathtaking and scary.

    Any country could do that.
    They just have to have the money and the will to cut through the red tape.

    The difference between China & the USA is that in the USA, one City accepts the honor. In China, the Central Government is in charge.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  49. Re:not a real issue by wallsg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most Chinese dictionaries actually sort characters first by the radical and then by stoke count within each group of radicals.

    Fool! Look at the government sanctioned sites! There are NO radicals in China!

  50. Re:not a real issue by emilng · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Probably because that would have been another layer of complexity/confusion for any countries that aren't familiar with the Chinese writing system.

    I kind of wished they showed the Chinese characters at the bottom of the screen with the country name so that at least we would have a better understanding of what they meant by counting strokes, but then again since they changed the order of the countries appearing that would explain why they didn't do that.

  51. Re:not a real issue by teko_teko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A more correct example should be:
    1. Blue car goes around the road, then parked in a parking spot
    2. Red car goes around the road, then parked in a parking spot
    3. Yellow car goes around the road, then parked in a parking spot
    4. Green car goes around the road, then parked in a parking spot

    No matter what order you change them, it doesn't change much of the overall story, as their order is not significant.

  52. Re:not a real issue by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Funny

    No free radicals, you mean. Which is why Chinese always look so healthy and young.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  53. live from japan by dutchtommy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i watched it live in japan-on NHK.
    china was last, the USA somewhere near the middle/end.

    i imagine that the entire show was edited...especially the CHEERS that the USA recieved when taking the field. (btw, north korea got cheered too!) the Australians and the British were also recieved well.

    awesome show!

  54. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by slashqwerty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China spent $40 billion* over six years getting ready for the Olympics. The US spends less than half of that on the Iraq war every six months. If we had the will we could do the same thing China did.

    The Beijing Olympics are a huge matter of national pride in China. As others have mentioned the United States has had its moments of national pride. That's what drove us to the moon over the course of eight years. The moon landings cost us over three times what China spent preparing for the Olympics.

    The US, UK, and Canada managed to develop nuclear weapons over the course of five years at a cost of $28 billion in today's dollars. We built the Panama Canal in ten years. We developed a cure for polio in 40 years. It's not so hard to imagine building an airport or even sprucing up an entire city from airport to subway to stadiums if there were a factor driving us to do so.

    *China reportedly budgeted $2 billion for the event itself and over $100 million just on fireworks.

  55. Re:not a real issue by mea_culpa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was told by someone from Shanghai that in Traditional Chinese (Mandarin) sorting is done by number of strokes, but the newer Simplified Chinese is sorted by alphabetical/phonetic pinyin.

    Although when I asked about it I was inquiring how Windows Explorer sort files using Chinese characters.

  56. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by traindirector · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An upside-down flag is an international signal of distress.

    Indeed, and I found Lin Hao carrying it a wonderful symbol of China's acknowledgement of the distress it experienced after the earthquake and the way in which China has finally become internationally open enough to let others know of its pain and to ask for assistance. The ceremony was full of contrasts, and the upside-down flag was just one more: the proud and powerful China walking next to the fragile and weak China that needs help (who is finally not afraid to ask for it). I found this and the other symbolism of the opening ceremony extremely moving.

    In context of a political display, that kid was basically saying "My government hasn't even begun to help rebuild my village after the earthquake".

    How did you interpret China parading both its strength and weakness, and the fact that it wants to display both to the world at this, one of its most important international moments, an anti-government message? How could you watch the almost unbelievable near-perfection of the rest of the ceremony (the printing press, the Tai Chi masters...) and think the flag could be an accident? It's really quite a stretch of the imagination.

    There's a message in there about Chinese culture, too, and I don't think it was the one they wanted to send.

    To me, they sent exactly the message I imagine they wanted to send. Perhaps they did fail at sending their message. But, if so, it was not a matter of the upside-down flag not being planned. Their failure would be that they expected you and the Western world to understand that their asking for help and letting their weakness and tragedy be seen is as important as a show of strength at the games.

    Perhaps the government-run media did crop the flag from the images released within China to manage the internal interpretation. Perhaps it was a controversial decision that not everyone important knew about ahead of time, and that someone with power disapproved of after seeing. I'm not saying that this symbolism matches at all how the government operates, even if it seems to be moving in that direction. I'm not saying that it's part of the government's ideology or plan. But for what it is not, it is a powerful message that is hard to believe was not deliberate and planned at some type of government-approved level.

    You are correct--I couldn't ever imagine seeing a US flag upside-down in an international ceremony. That's why I was especially touched to see China acknowledge their distress and their need for assistance in a way that my own country never would.

  57. Re:I'm sure I'm the only one on the planet, but... by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As others have pointed out, all of this is really just a matter of national priority.

    As a taxpayer I'd hate to have my national government pay billions of dollars to put on an athletic competition. I can see how providing standard police services and such are within the scope of a government, but throwing a huge party and entertainment show isn't.

    Look, humans are humans. There is nothing saying that the Europeans couldn't have landed on the moon if they wanted to spend that kind of money. The Chinese could have as well. Granted, at any given time particular nations have economies that are in various levels of repair - Europe or China probably couldn't have landed on the moon in the 60s even with a massively dedicated effort. However, either could probably do it today just fine.

    Ditto for throwing an entertainment event. It isn't like Chinese acrobats are any better than Mexican acrobats. Just look at the Soviet Chess program - it had huge state sponsorship and unsurprisingly they turned out far better chess players than nations in which people played chess for fun almost entirely without compensation. Today the program is a shadow of its former self - and it isn't becuase Russians are being born dumber.

    What all of this really demonstrates is the power of authoritarian governments to mobilize their entire nations around goals that are decided upon by a handful of those in power. A country with the economy of North Korea can mobilize more artillery tubes pointed at its rival than any nation in Europe. It isn't like the French don't know how to fashion a rifled cannon (gee, they've only been doing that for a century or so) - they just see the value in having millions of them pointed at Belgium. Likewise, I'm sure Germany could throw a 20 billion euro party if it wanted to, but I suspect the locals would rather see that money going into healthcare or maybe just into their own pockets.

    Granted, democratic nations do bread-and-circuses too (aka Iraq), but they at least need to convince their populations to go along with it - without the benefit of highly self-censored media (although clueless media helps with slight self-censorship).

  58. Re:Did anyone else see by The+Zen+Cow+Says+Mu · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've got to cut the guy some slack: (1) It was unbelievably hot and uncomfortable in the stadium (2) The parade of nations is unnecessarily long and boring (heck, I tivo'd it and watched it sped up and it still took an hour) (3) President Bush can't look at a watch discreetly -- it takes time to figure out which is the hour hand and which does the minutes, and Mickey's so gosh-darn cute you can't help but stare