Slashdot Mirror


Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Abduction

Because the number of abductions in Mexico has jumped almost 40% in the past 3 years, the wealthy are getting subcutaneous transmitters so they can be tracked when kidnapped. Xega, the Mexican security firm which makes the chips, has seen a sales jump of 13% this year. The company injects the crystal-encased chip, the size and shape of a grain of rice, into clients' bodies with a syringe. The chip then sends radio signals to a larger device carried by the client with a global positioning system in it. A satellite can then be used to find the location of the missing person. Things must be a lot worse in Mexico than I thought.

306 comments

  1. Please make it stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh.. the humanity...

    1. Re:Please make it stop by dotancohen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was going to read it, then noticed that I'm on idle.~, so I stopped.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:Please make it stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In related news, has anyone else noticed strange behavior recently? I use FF2 and usually set my user agent to IE so I can disable D2 without logging in; that seems to not be working right now for some reason. So I manually disable D2 (no_d2=1 in the query string) and now the text box to post comments in is ridiculously small for some reason. I have both AdBlock and NoScript (the ONLY way to browse), so I tried disabling those; same results. I don't like D2, but I can live with it. Whoever was involved with creating "Idle", however, deserves immediate, painful, and humiliating death.

    3. Re:Please make it stop by negRo_slim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the number of abductions in Mexico has jumped almost 40% in the past 3 years

      Okay, well 40% increase doesn't neccesarily mean its a large number or ever was to begin with.

      Xega, the Mexican security firm which makes the chips, has seen a sales jump of 13% this year.

      Once again, if the their sales were only a handful prior... But really the big issue is we're afraid that at some point in the future we will see this mandated by the government and a case like this will be used as justification of the need. Really though, I would think those with the most wealth and/or power would be the least likely to want to be tracked.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    4. Re:Please make it stop by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

      Interesting... and interesting since the wealthy usually are the ones who are capable of actually defending themselves and "getting away with it" as the newspapermen call it.

      AFAIC (As far as I care), if they can't be bothered to be properly outfitted for self defense, they deserve to be captured by thugs AND to have their chip painfully removed, along with whatever else it was implanted into. Sure would be nice to see the mexican thugs get wise to this and use painful live surgery to remove chips... perhaps even implant them in some wild rats or whatnot and set them loose :) Would that ever be funny.

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    5. Re:Please make it stop by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1, Redundant

      What makes me so damn angry about people wanting to be tracked like livestock, is simple...

      If you want to be treated like cattle, I certainly hope you get EXACTLY what you wish... and you get it good and hard.

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    6. Re:Please make it stop by flosofl · · Score: 2, Informative
      From Wikipedia's article Crime in Mexico:

      During the first three years of Fox's government, the official number of reported kidnappings showed a slight decrease, from 505 in 2001 to 438 in 2003. The new Federal Investigation Agency (Procuraduria de Justicia) reported dismantling 48 kidnapping rings and saving 419 victims.

      Now those aren't recent numbers (about 4 years back). But still even if they reduced them to 300/yr since then (which I think would be miraculous) a 40% increase would mean an avg of over 1 person per day.

      I remember seeing a a documentary on personal armored vehicles (think a Navigator with about a ton of armor and ballistic glass). They said that the number one money maker for criminals in Mexico City was kidnapping. The armorers said that next to the Middle East, their top market was Mexico City specifically because of all the kidnappings.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    7. Re:Please make it stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tagged this article "ohnoitsidle" ala "ohnoitsroland". What is up with this stupid comment box, btw?

    8. Re:Please make it stop by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, kids getting implants ripped off is just hilarious. That's what they get for not carrying.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    9. Re:Please make it stop by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know what I find stupid?

      How everyone's worried about their kids being kidnapped, yet I was born in a country where human slavery (and the kidnappings that resulted in said human trade) was alive and well. Interestingly, I never got kidnapped and neither did any of my siblings, or cousins, or whatever else. Most of their deaths, of those few that died, were due to political executions by the government or "army service"... which was the same thing. Undesirables with undesirable views were always assigned to the unit that got the least training, shittiest gear, and front line service.

      So my comment stands. I have valid experience with not being kidnapped in a country rampant with kidnappings and both organ and flesh trade. If you were born, and live in the USA or a "western" country. You do not have such experience. You've lived your whole life in a nice safe haven. It was made so not by government. (If that were true, then China and the former USSR would've been the safest places on the planet.) Safe places are made by the bad guys not knowing when they'll not be coming home. It is also made by people learning NOT to get into a car with or taking candy from strangers. This is increasingly so with so called rich people. Especially when said rich people actually can move their residence on a whim. But hey, better off as cattle than walking without fear.

      So suit yourself. You pack your chip, I'll pack my Colt, good training, and good mindset. If we both run into bad guys, and can't escape, lets see which one of us is more likely to make it home. Me with my training and proper mindset, or you with your chip. Hope the badguys don't decide that they're kidnapping you to send you home in a salsa bag as a "message"... otherwise that chip won't really help you much if all they want to do is send a message. As for me, they either take me by complete surprise, and take a chance at having to neutralize a large "neighborhood" where we look out for each other, or they stay the hell away. So much simpler :) And for the record, I don't flaunt my wealth IRL, what little I have. Wealth is for my personal well being, not to flaunt in my neighbors' eyes. I help mine. This is the sticks out here man, if you get missing here, the only thing the chip will help, is to find the wild animal that got you, presuming it actually ate the part with the chip :)

      Its you city slickers that need protection by others. Out here, you provide your own, or you don't go home. Most of the folks I met here, whether sticks living for life, or "reformed city slickers", few seem to need someone to "make them safe". We got 3 sheriff deputies, which are still 3 too many, but at least they're nice enough to not interfere with people's lives. Strangely, we don't need SWAT or hostage rescue. Why? Dunno, maybe a different culture out here than some of the places you've been around. AFAIC, I believe you lay your own bed. If you need to be chipped like property to be "safe" or to have your kids be safe, i just hope you don't complain when you're treated like property. Remember, property has no rights. When you take on its likeness, you become it. Hope its to your liking, and know I will be among those who respects your decision and never lifts a finger to help you.

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    10. Re:Please make it stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:Please make it stop by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      Okay, well 40% increase doesn't neccesarily mean its a large number or ever was to begin with.

      It is and it was.

      I'm an American citizen that lived in Mexico 10 years but moved back to the US in 2006. I did so just in time. Things have really gotten nasty down there and are even getting dangerous in places that were previously pretty much as safe as most places in the US.

    12. Re:Please make it stop by zsau · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have my respect for typing such a long reply into such a narrow box, but aside from that I think it's confused:

      • These chips aren't for "city slickers" living in America, they're for people in Mexico.
      • Having a chip doesn't stop you packing a gun.
      • Having a chip doesn't make yourself like property; it's like carrying a mobile phone. Or a gun ("oh, he can't help himself; he needs to have his own personal protection service like cattle").
      • Refusing to help someone clearly in need is the most inhumane thing in world, regardless of whether you have different views on personal security.
      • The reason western countries are safe is precisely because of the government. The bad guys know if they attack the general public there's too much risk they will be caught by the police i.e. a government arm — even if the crooks have guns and us civilians don't. I don't know what your reference to Russia and China was meant to prove; they barely have governments, will all the corruption they've got up top.
      --
      Look out!
    13. Re:Please make it stop by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      It is *much* worse than the statistics say.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7553633.stm

      Mexico police is involved in kidnappings as well. You'd be surprised how close to reality a movie like "Man On Fire" ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0328107/ ) with Danzel Washington actually is.

    14. Re:Please make it stop by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      What happened to all those jobs we sent down there?

      Are we outsourcing to Mexico only to have our outsourcing further outsourced to Guatemala or China?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Please make it stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's a lot of difference being kidnapped and slaved to being kidnapped and killed or choped up to sell your organs in the black market. the wealthy ones you hear that are being kidnapped is nothing to the ones that don't even appear on the news, the "atm ride" is a common practice, express kidnaps, and more on mexico city, they're even used to that. on the other side of the country (the north border) the drug dealers are killing most of the cops and polititians and innocent people, not more than a week ago a friend of mine was innocently killed (google it: "rene reyes" ) by drug dealers, he had nothing to do with them, he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, fifteen days ago on "creel" they massacred 15 persons, kids and babies included and believe me they weren't showing off any wealth.
       

    16. Re:Please make it stop by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      Safe places are made by the bad guys not knowing when they'll not be coming home

      Or by a combination of efficient police and scarcity of bad guys

      It is also made by people learning NOT to get into a car with or taking candy from strangers

      Teaching kids not to get a gun pointed at their head is slightly harder

      lets see which one of us is more likely to make it home. Me with my training and proper mindset, or you with your chip

      Frankly, I believe your "proper mindset" won't stop you from getting kidnapped, and in many situations resistance can be deadly. You're assuming kidnappers show up in a situation where you have a chance to act. If you get a gun pointed at your head then playing cowboy gets you killed. Neither solution is great, some kidnapped people are killed (a minority), but if you pull a gun your odds are even worse. You've got your armed neighbourhood alright, but I don't understand what solution you advocate for these people, save moving near your house. And kidnappings to send a message are extremely rare, unless you deal with the mob somehow

      Its you city slickers that need protection by others. Out here, you provide your own, or you don't go home

      Well, that's the great thing about living in a city and not having to provide your own bread and security

      If you need to be chipped like property to be "safe" or to have your kids be safe, i just hope you don't complain when you're treated like property

      What exactly are you saying, that people shouldn't be allowed to put on these things, or that their kidnapping, assault, murder, etc. should become legal as soon as they do? Or just that criminals have the moral right to do to them whatever they want?

      I will be among those who respects your decision and never lifts a finger to help you

      What's your criteria for helping people, asking them if they have a "personal tracking device" (chip, cellphone, computer) or if they come from the city?
      Now you tell me what to do about the government of my "nice safe haven" (Argentina) making ownership of guns increasingly difficult, almost impossible if you're not in private security. Or the tiny detail that I'm a minor.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    17. Re:Please make it stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about one better if that can be said to be the right word? When you are 'chipped', a small device is injected into your arm, ass, or somewhere 'just under the skin'. However, the device often does not stay there. It tends to migrate all over your body and can get to some places where localization may be difficult or in places where it cannot be safely removed; and that is my point! You see, if somebody can see you on a map in order to 'find' you, then so can somebody else. You might not like the folks observing behind the 'other radar screens'. The terrorist hackers, the scammers, the phishers, the malevolent governments, and other filth of the world too numerous to name all have their skills to locate you as well. And if some do not at present have the 'keys to your kingdom', rest assured that at some future time or to you a very inconvenient and unfortunate time they certainly will. What you have done is simply to put a large bell on yourself advertising to the world that you are a 'rich man/woman' and are willing to go naked, defenseless, and ignorant among the lions and hyenas, and cobras and tai-pans of modern and not so modern society. What some members of that 'alternative' society do when they get their claws on you is anybodies' guess.

    18. Re:Please make it stop by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      Yes. When I was there I know a lot of IT work was then being outsourced to India.

      Still, the jobs (or lack thereof) have nothing to do with the kidnappings and security. The problem is corruption.

    19. Re:Please make it stop by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you stopped fucking with the login and just used the browser like a normal non-insane person it would actually work.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    20. Re:Please make it stop by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Come talk to us again if you child gets kidnapped and the cops say they have no idea where they are.

      There are many good reasons for being able to find someone besides the paranoid delusions of governments watching your every move.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    21. Re:Please make it stop by StrategicIrony · · Score: 1

      oh yes, won't someone please THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!?1

    22. Re:Please make it stop by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The jobs in Mexico are all based upon low wage exploitative employment conditions. In order to enforce these conditions an aggressive hostile society is created and expanded upon.

      Rather than work to improve conditions in Mexico the rich and greedy simply spend more and more upon protection services whilst corrupting the government so that they can exploit the majority.

      This exploitation inevitably leads to greater violence in it's enforcement and naturally enough creates a more violent criminal society as a reaction to that enforcement.

      It is only fitting that the rich and greedy suffer at the hands of the society that their stupidity creates, it is just a terrible shame that they drag their country down with them.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    23. Re:Please make it stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come back to us, when the criminals use the exact same tracker you implanted to find your child, kidnap it and painfully remove it. Or anyone else for that matter.

    24. Re:Please make it stop by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      I'm not going out of my way to protect children, just not laughing at them getting kidnapped and cut open to remove the crap inside them.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    25. Re:Please make it stop by emilper · · Score: 1

      If I understand it right, it's those with wealth and power that want their _dependants_ tracked.

      In other news: kidnappers don't bother with the implants, just strip their victims naked to make sure the GPS device is removed, and since the implants don't work without them ...

      I wonder why not just carry the GPS device ...

    26. Re:Please make it stop by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

      And through all of that, in typical slashdot fashion you miss the damn point.

      Let me give you an example. A relative of mine living in fairly large "safe" town, big government area, gets jumped, nearly raped, escapes that fate, but is beaten toothless. She's (was) a pretty lady, but like most in those big government areas, she minds everyone's business but her own. She's only alert for shit she can gossip, and people she can bitch at, and while I love her, I figured her lack of attention and her unwillingness to be alert is what cost her quite a few healthy teeth. She's far more alert now (I could still take her by surprise if I wanted to ambush her, but she's made great progress) however, my question is, why does the government have to prove its ineptitude before people realize that the SINGLE AND ONLY deciding factor in one's safety, at any time, and any place is one's own awareness and one's willingness and ability to act upon that awareness... all other things may fail randomly, but an alert, aware individual can recognize and respond to situations FAR more easily than one still waiting for help to arrive.

      As for my own observation... people who get ambushed and then kidnapped, are generally those who are not paying attention. If someone points a gun at your head, chances are VERY GOOD that you had a long time to see them coming... unless they broke into your home while you were sleeping. Police/SWAT are more likely to do this on a trump charge or a wrong address "no knock" raid, here in the USA than bad guys looking to ransom you. I have acquaintances who have shot, and killed assailants, very well "self trained" acquaintances, who then spent a few days clearing their names, with proper documented evidence. When asked 'would you rather have depended on police and not fought back', their answer is to walk away after saying something like this... "why, would it make a better news story for you, if you could report a brutal murder of a defenseless victim?"

      I don't bash anyone wanting to be chipped, but being more trackable does not make you "safe". Being more trackable means worse people than common criminals can now "find you" at their leisure.

      --
      " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    27. Re:Please make it stop by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It isn't the wealthy ones over there that I'm worried about. Why can't they chip the poorer ones coming over here illegally....would make it easier to find them for easy 'repatriation'....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    28. Re:Please make it stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I can agree with that

      Anonymous because this message is completely redundant

  2. Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great. Now when you're kidnapped the first thing they'll do is cut off a chunk of your flesh. Or even just stick you in a metallic sack so that the radio signal can't escape.

    1. Re:Wonderful by Freeside1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The chip then sends radio signals to a larger device carried by the client with a global positioning system in it.

      Or they can just smash the 'device' to bits. I fail to see the utility of this system.

    2. Re:Wonderful by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      They might not even try snatching people who are seen carrying the 'device'. They'll instead go after girls who don't have one of these on display. Likely.

    3. Re:Wonderful by davester666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or the opposite. Anybody carrying one of these devices thinks of themselves as being wealthy and/or important. That is like having a tattoo on your forehead saying "Kidnap Me".

      And of course, once kidnapped the external device is destroyed. And if the implanted device has any significant range [say, more than 1 room, so it may be detected outside the room where you are held], the implant also gets dug out. So, if you're lucky, you will be ransomed quickly, so you can get some antibiotics to kill the infection...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. Now when you're kidnapped the first thing they'll do is cut off a chunk of your flesh. Or even just stick you in a metallic sack so that the radio signal can't escape.

      In case you were not aware, one of the things the kidnappers will often do is to cut off a finger to send to your relatives. If your relatives don't pay fast enough cutting off another finger helps to emphasize the urgency that is required.

    5. Re:Wonderful by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pretty much... gives the term "Faraday Cage" a whole new meaning.

    6. Re:Wonderful by noidentity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Think "watchdog timer". It's like all you sysadmins who can tell when a system goes down, not because it sends a "Hey, I just went down" signal, but because it stops sending a "hey I'm up" signal.

    7. Re:Wonderful by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great. Now when you're kidnapped the first thing they'll do is cut off a chunk of your flesh. Or even just stick you in a metallic sack so that the radio signal can't escape.
      But wait! The best part is, if you try to tamper with the internal device, it explodes violently, marking everything in the vicinity with a blue die, and rendering the kidnapped person useless.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:Wonderful by synaptic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You want a toe? I can get you a toe, believe me. There are ways, Dude. You don't wanna know about it, believe me.

      Hell, I can get you a toe by 3 o'clock this afternoon... with nail polish. These fucking amateurs...

    9. Re:Wonderful by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Informative

      So we'll need to inject all girls with one of those too. Problem solved.

    10. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't they just carry the larger device in the first place?

    11. Re:Wonderful by k1e0x · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good thinking rich guys.

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    12. Re:Wonderful by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are you talking about? The Polish are not the issue here, Dude. I'm talking about drawing a line in the sand, Dude. Across this line, you DO NOT... Also, Dude, Polish is not the preferred nomenclature. Slavic-American, please.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    13. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. Now when you're kidnapped the first thing they'll do is cut off a chunk of your flesh. Or even just stick you in a metallic sack so that the radio signal can't escape.

      But wait! The best part is, if you try to tamper with the internal device, it explodes violently, marking everything in the vicinity with a blue die, and rendering the kidnapped person useless.

      I lol'ed

    14. Re:Wonderful by mikael · · Score: 1

      They were cutting off bits of peoples flesh before this technology was introduced, so people having nothing to lose.

      But given the mood in Mexico, any corrupt police officers may just end up having a life-span slightly less than an airline hijacker armed with a box-cutter.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    15. Re:Wonderful by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the idea was to locate the kidnapped person. How are you going to do that if the GPS device is broken? This thing does help because they will find out about missing people faster and maybe find out where they have been when they were kidnapped. But still, it doesn't do what is says it does. Also, like others pointed out, this might even make the wearer a more likely target.

      --
      ics
    16. Re:Wonderful by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      They have done that for biometric readers where they cut off fingers or other body parts to fake out these. Yes, I think they would put you in a anti-static bag or box for a server.
      A criminal will do anything to get there stuff depending what mental state they are in. If they kidnap you then they already are doing physical harm anyways so having this will only identify you easier if they kill you.

    17. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I dont think people here seem to understand how neat this is.

      Who says that the external device cant be a watch an ipod or my favorite imbedded in a shoe. [agent smart style :-) ]

      These sort of kidnappings are crimes of opportunity .

      What happens is they grab you stick you in a car for a few hours while making threats to family members.
      "Give us the cash or there dead" sort of calls.

      What this device does lets people know a crime has been committed ,where and when and until they crooks catch on where the victim is.

      It means it becomes much harder to commit these crimes as now you have remove the victims watch, Ipod , shoes etc.

      When you go to clubs how may bouncers check your shoes?

      One slip up and there gone. [sorry for the pun :-)]

    18. Re:Wonderful by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      Gee so wonderful. Having a dangerous explosive device in me. If I get too "rough" with my spouse then will it explode then?
      Kidnappers have unstable minds and they have killed the victim even though they have the ransom. I rather have my Sig/Colt than having this implanted in me.

    19. Re:Wonderful by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with the device, but I'd assume the cops would be the ones with the "bigger" GPS unit.

      They cruise to suspected locations looking for a signal. If they get within range, then they can get pretty accurate directions to where the kidnapped person is being held.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    20. Re:Wonderful by palegray.net · · Score: 1, Funny

      You apparently misunderstood the story. You see, these wealthy Mexicans are indeed getting chipped as a hedge against being kidnapped, but it's a tactic meant to prolong survival, not assist in their immediate rescue.

      They're having large volumes of tortilla chips compressed into small volumes through sophisticated matter reduction technologies. These tortilla chip packets ("microchips", if you will) are then implanted under the skin in various regions of the body. Inadvertent tortilla deployment is prevented through daily exposure to a specific frequency of RF radiation, which ceases upon the individual's kidnapping. The calorie-laden tortilla chiplets begin to expand, releasing a clotting agent and mild anaesthetic into the surrounding tissue to mitigate any unpleasant sensations from their eruption through the skin. After their time-released eruption, the packets expand to their full volume, providing delicious sustenance for the captive.

    21. Re:Wonderful by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Still, this is not a terribly fool proof idea. The kidnappers could throw the device into a passing freight train to confuse law enforcement.

    22. Re:Wonderful by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      or how about simply take your pager that you are wearing that is the actual tracking device. the chipping is actually a gimmick the real tracking device is the larger gps/transmitter they must wear.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    23. Re:Wonderful by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Thats ok, when I first read the headline I thought kidnappers were putting rich Mexicans through woodchippers.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    24. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still doesn't help them find the hostage. I think everyone knows the rich guy has been abducted when armed guys haul away the rich guy don't you think?

    25. Re:Wonderful by Casandro · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, this looks like a passive RFID implant. Those don't really go far. And essentially you just need to put that person into a van. Neither the RFID-implant, nor GPS will get there.

      So essentially you get a detector for those RFID implants, if you find a person with one, you pull it into a van smash the external device to pieces and get away. Meanwhile you can photograph that person and write that death threadt. If you are lucky the implant even can be cross referenced to a database containing the name and address of that person.

      It's a great way to make abductions more efficient. In fact, you might even build a machine which automatically abducts people.

    26. Re:Wonderful by init100 · · Score: 1

      but I'd assume the cops would be the ones with the "bigger" GPS unit.

      That's unlikely, since the chip is most likely a passive RFID chip, and the ranges of those are pretty short.

    27. Re:Wonderful by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      Even if it worked that WTF do they need it to be a _GPS_ unit? They (should) already know their location. Also, like init100 said, the distance is probably really short for such a small device. Even if it did work at a reasonable distance, they need at least 2 devices to pinpoint the kidnapped person's location.

      --
      ics
    28. Re:Wonderful by alderX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They can throw away the device, but it wouldn't confuse law enforcement.

      I guess the point is that the device is constantly reading the RFID chip. And that the device is constantly sending it's position.

      If the RFID chip can't be read, then they take it as an indication that the device is no longer attached to the person and that this is probably due to a crime. So they now "know" (a) a crime is happening and (b) it happend somewhere between the last two signals (1st signal being the last one with RFID chip access, 2nd signal being the first one without RFID chip access).

      So still the bad guy could cut out the RFID chip and tape it to the device and then throw the device away. If they are a bit more civilized they clone the RFID chip and then tape the clone to the device.

    29. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but because it stops sending a "hey I'm up" signal.

      More like a "Hey, my arm is no longer up" signal.

    30. Re:Wonderful by thegnu · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. All rich Mexicans have a tattoo reading "Favor de no desmembrar, ni meter en saco de metal."

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    31. Re:Wonderful by the_womble · · Score: 1

      The chip then sends radio signals to a larger device carried by the client with a global positioning system in it.

      Or they can just smash the 'device' to bits. I fail to see the utility of this system.

      I assume that the moment it is smashed the fact that it has stopped transmitting is noticed and alarms ring and a last known location and time are recorded.

      The implanted chip prevents them just taking the transmitter away.

    32. Re:Wonderful by Floritard · · Score: 1

      I recently watched the documentary Manda Bala about the political corruption and kidnapping rampant in Brazil. There was a man interviewed who was so interested in this technology he said he would in fact get 2 implants in case the first was somehow removed. While I have no real grasp of this man's day to day reality I find such an enthusiasm for being chipped by the government alarming.

    33. Re:Wonderful by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just carry the larger device in the first place?

      Then it could be separated from you and continue to operate with a decoy continuing on your usual route, concealing your abduction location. By pairing with the chip in your body, if it is separated from you it trips the alarm.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  3. Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by SengirV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The chip then sends radio signals to a larger device carried by the client with a global positioning system in it.

    Call me crazy, but I think I found a flaw in their system.

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

  4. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Call me crazy, but I think I found a flaw in their system.

    You're just too cynical.

    In other news, I had a personal transportation chip injected into my feet. So long as I'm occupying a moving vehicle, it works perfectly at transporting me around.

  5. All aboard the clue train. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Things must be a lot worse in Mexico than I thought.

    Somebody hasn't been paying attention. Kidnapping is an entire industry in countries south of the Rio Grande, especially in Mexico and Brazil, and has been for at least a decade.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    1. Re:All aboard the clue train. by sponga · · Score: 1

      So what is your solution to help solve some of the kidnappings?

      I know it is trendy to criticize things here on Slashdot and right after not provide a solution to the problem.

      In fact somebody has been paying attention and the reason they made these.

      I always thought that would be a good idea to put a radio tag implanted in them randomly if they were a high opportunity target and than fly over the city with a helicopter until you get close to it after the kidnapping. Like tracking a bear in the wild or something.

      Kidnappings in Mexico are on the rise and they are even trying to kidnap people in Arizona across the border. There really are no other solid solutions to this problem, although I can see limbs being chopped off because they think theres a radio transmitter.

      I am not worried about the Govt. wanting to probe me up the ass because I have one of these, I would be more worried about the kidnappers trying to get me.

      I just hope the Mexicans have higher standards and will not tolerate this crap like what they do down in South America. Good thing they have brought the military into Tijuana and other states around there to clamp down on some of the drug cartels and kidnappings.

    2. Re:All aboard the clue train. by sponga · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh and add to it today the Mexican government had a summit on the rising kidnappings, something like 700+ in 2007.

      Mexico now surpasses Columbia and Iraq for kidnappings.

      http://www.beurs.nl/nieuws/artikel.php?id=269380&taal=US

      http://www.silobreaker.com/DocumentClusterReader.aspx?Item=16_893954563

      They even have something setup there for video bloggers to submit their solutions. Of course nobody from around here will provide a solution, they will just provide some more whine with cheese.

    3. Re:All aboard the clue train. by antibryce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not just south of the border either. There have been over 200 kidnappings in the US this year so far.

      But hey don't call for tighter border security or you're a racist!

    4. Re:All aboard the clue train. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Solution: first repeal the gun ban in Mexico, implement something closer to what we have in the US. Of course not quite as restrictive as it's pretty lame in some places here too. Weed out the crazies and felons the best you can but make sure everyone else also has a gun.

      Like them or hate them they are the great equalizer. make sure most citizens have a gun and kidnappings will go down to almost zero. Kidnapper related gun deaths may go up for a little while though.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:All aboard the clue train. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      80s huh? I suppose the 108 people kidnapped in Sao Paulo in 1998 alone were just imagining things? I'll grant that the kidnapping situation in Brazil has improved a lot, but it's far from 'erased'.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    6. Re:All aboard the clue train. by sponga · · Score: 1

      I was watching some of the highlights of the 'Mexican Summit on Kidnappings and other rising crimes'.

      The politicians were criticized hard for not doing anything and that the college students could do a better job, that was from a dad whos son was kidnapped and killed.

      The Mexican politicians promised the people two main things is to cut down on the corruption by stronger police forces and better security. Also they talked about how the judicial system will be improved and the corruption will be tackled a lot harder.

      They also talked about building special prisons just for kidnappers.

      Giving the citizens guns will not help unfortunately when most of these guys have AK-47 and other high power guns. Guns can help though just make sure they are licensed right.

      The Mexican father who had his son kidnapped from a University but later killed found out that a arrested police officer was involved with the kidnapping along with others.

    7. Re:All aboard the clue train. by a1ok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Giving the citizens guns will not help unfortunately when most of these guys have AK-47 and other high power guns.

      So if the criminals already have AK-47 and other weapons, the would-be abductees are better served fighting with stones and kitchen cutlery rather than revolvers? I'm undecided on any 'gun control' debates and haven't really thought about it too much - but if someone is trying to kidnap me and there is a good chance I'll be killed, I would certainly try hard to resist and kill my attacker. And I really would prefer to try with a gun instead of a handy pipe or something, esp. as guns tend to have much more range than knives and sticks.

    8. Re:All aboard the clue train. by californication · · Score: 1

      As a resident of San Diego, I want to say that kidnapping here is not a problem. The only kidnapping in San Diego I've heard about was the kidnapping of a wealthy Mexican citizen who was held in a house somewhere in the county, but he was rescued and the thugs are being prosecuted. Although I believe tighter border security would help with overall crime, I also believe building a giant wall is a complete waste of money.

      I also don't think Mexico is as scary a place as people make it out to be. I've traveled to many places there including Tijuana and Mexico City. If you use common sense, like not walking around the city alone, staying out of the bad areas, not drinking yourself into a vulnerable stupor and not being a drug dealer, then you'll be ok.

    9. Re:All aboard the clue train. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The giant wall isn't to keep the Mexicans out. It's to keep the Americans in.

    10. Re:All aboard the clue train. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do kidnappings have to do with border security?

      A quick google search tells me that more than 200 people are hit by lightning each year. Several orders of magnitude more people are killed in accidents.

      Frankly, I'm surprised that there aren't thousands or tens of thousands of people kidnapped each year in America. Maybe it's because people with enough money to be worth kidnapping often have illegals working in their homes, so they're not alone and vulnerable very often.

    11. Re:All aboard the clue train. by quenda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like your approach. If every car had a .50cal machine gun on the hood, drivers would be a lot more courteous.
      And RPGs would be a great equaliser between cars and trucks.
            Best of all, the UN should issue every country with a set of nukes. I'll bet that would cut down on invasions of small oil-rich nations.

    12. Re:All aboard the clue train. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.

      Whomever has the biggest posse wins. Oh, quick and quiet also help, I suppose.

      Besides, "...hey, its not my problem!".

      And, of course civility and self-control *will* suffer dramatic increase. Specially around dudes in black w/ silver trimmings - or fashionable pinstripe and dark glasses.

      No doubt at all....

    13. Re:All aboard the clue train. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      That would make something of a funny Monty Python sketch...

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    14. Re:All aboard the clue train. by letxa2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Brazilian economy is ten times bigger than Mexico's.

      Ten times bigger? Brazil = $1.314 trillion. Mexico = $893.4 billion. Brazil's economy isn't even twice as large as Mexico's. And while your economy is slightly larger, Mexico's per capita GDP is $12,800 while Brazil's is $9,700.

      Sorry, Mexico is doing better than Brazil by any meaningful measure. But yes, Brazil has more people earning less money than Mexico. What Brazil lacks in personal income it makes up for in population quantity.

    15. Re:All aboard the clue train. by thegnu · · Score: 1

      The problem is most people want tighter border security so they can avoid having to deal with another culture. Not that that's all people. But it's the people with vestigial Irish or Scottish accents telling the continental native to go home. Bwahaha.

      My favorite condemning bumber sticker: "I don't dial 1 for ENGLISH!!" Yeah? You're a stupid fuck.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    16. Re:All aboard the clue train. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you managed to troll four people. You're saying MEXICANS are behind our kidnappings?

    17. Re:All aboard the clue train. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      How many countries with nukes have been invade lately? Ever?

      You may have a good idea there.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  6. I am skeptical by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

    It won't be long before the thugs figure out a way to scan for those devices and try to get rid of them. Or simpler still, threaten the victim to show where it is and allow them to excise it out.

    1. Re:I am skeptical by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      And in other news, sales of Tasers in Mexico have gone through the roof...

  7. Bogus News To Lure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    brain dead U.S. residents into getting chipped so they can be tracked by this Organized Crime Syndicate.

    1. Re:Bogus News To Lure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did realize that the link you provided is a parody site, eh?

    2. Re:Bogus News To Lure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT, HAND.

    3. Re:Bogus News To Lure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who will troll the trolls?

    4. Re:Bogus News To Lure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quis trolleriat ipsos trollax0rz?

  8. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    Call me crazy, but I think I found a flaw in their system.

    That would depend on where they're hiding it...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  9. Nice when the victims make it easy to find them... by vanyel · · Score: 1

    I'll bet organized crime has the trackers faster than the police do. Probably stolen *from* the police...

  10. So exactly what is the implant for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you need to carry a "larger device" with you to send the signal, why do you need an implant?

    1. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What exactly is the implant for? My guess is squeezing another couple grand out of scared rich folk.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by markana · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's simple.

      If they get thrown in jail, then can dig the implants out of their arms, and use them to make a primitive laser to cut open the lock.

      Of course, it takes 2 implants, and a piece of an old bedframe....

    3. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      My guess is that if the implant can no longer communicate with the larger device, a trigger goes off to notify the service to start looking for that person in the last known location. After that, you're really working with a perimeter that grows by time.

      Mij

    4. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by GospelHead821 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My intuition is that the interaction between the chip and the larger device is actually pretty important. If the device has a panic button on it, it serves as a homing beacon as long as it remains in the possession of the person with the chip. If it becomes separated from the person with the chip, it could automatically go into panic mode and identify the location where the person was forcibly separated from their device (or, you know, where they accidentally left it at the boutique.) Depending on exactly the range of the interaction between the chip and the device, recovering a victim's device could help to locate them if you come within N meters of them and their chip.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    5. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by nobodyman · · Score: 1

      (If it's the same technology I read about a while back) the implant is essentially an ID chip, and the larger device acts as an "amplifier" of sorts that broadcasts the position. The amplifier is probably generic, so any given amp would just broadcasts the ID's of any chips within range.

      If the larger device gets seperated from your person you're still screwed, but at least you won't be leading the authorities on a wild goose chase (think Total Recall, where Quaid eludes Cohaagen's men by sticking the transmitter in a candy bar and feeding it to a rat).

    6. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        So the kidnappers dig the implant out of you*, tape it to the device and leave it somewhere...

      SB
      * Probably with a dull spoon.

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    7. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by Hugonz · · Score: 1

      If they get thrown in jail, then can dig the implants out of their arms, and use them to make a primitive laser to cut open the lock.

      Of course, it takes 2 implants, and a piece of an old bedframe....

      And also this full season McGyver DVD set.

    8. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      No, it is a Star Trek (TOS ) reference. When Spock holds a piece of a bed frame to make a laser or some such.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    9. Re:So exactly what is the implant for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's not point in tracking a device if it's not next to you. The implant serves the function of telling the device that you are near.

  11. Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Abduc by www.upfuse.com · · Score: 1

    It's a pity they have to go to this extreme to get security.

    --
    Upfuse.com - Social Marketplace - Get 1.5% cash back for selling on Upfuse!
  12. Say again? by hansraj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The chip then sends radio signals to a larger device carried by the client with a global positioning system in it.

    Huh? What are these people smoking?

    Also, why is it on Idle and not on, say, science?

    1. Re:Say again? by dolmant_php · · Score: 1

      > Huh? What are these people smoking?

      > Also, why is it on Idle and not on, say, science?

      I think you answered your own question.

    2. Re:Say again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, why is it on Idle and not on, say, science?

      It's a nefarious trap to make you think that there might actually be something worthwhile in the idle section.

  13. What happens when... by pwnies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a common thief finds a way to access the positions of all of these rich people. Seems to me an easy way to establish targets, not protect them.

  14. This is why. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why we should put more R&D in implanting Laser Eyes. Whos gonna kidnap you if you can shoot lasers out of your eyes.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:This is why. by mangu · · Score: 1

      Whos gonna kidnap you if you can shoot lasers out of your eyes.

      The only problem is finding a fishbowl small enough to carry but big enough to hold a shark.

    2. Re:This is why. by ThanatosMinor · · Score: 1

      Kneel before Zod!

    3. Re:This is why. by dasheiff · · Score: 1

      "My ruby cortz visor helps contain my optic blasts."
      "Shut up, Scott."

    4. Re:This is why. by a1ok · · Score: 1

      Whos gonna kidnap you if you can shoot lasers out of your eyes.

      Only problem is, they might just jam your tinfoil hat down and over your laser eyes - and as everyone knows, tinfoil hats are *meant* to reflect radiation so ...

    5. Re:This is why. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone with Laser Eyes v2, maybe.

    6. Re:This is why. by Hugonz · · Score: 1

      Hello Sir.. may I see you laser eyes license , please?

  15. ewww by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i hope buyers realize that all they are doing is changing kidnapping standard operating procedure

    kidnappers will now locate the chip probably with nothing more than a $20 standard wall stud finder, then reach into the victim's skin with sharp nosed dirty pliers and toss the chip on the street. then probably send the victim's family a picture of the gaping wound for proof of untraceability and bonus horror factor

    ewwww

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:ewww by swillden · · Score: 1

      Why bother with all of that? Just toss the GPS device in the garbage. Leave the little RFID implanted where it's at. It can't do anything.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:ewww by neuromanc3r · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's more fun that way.

    3. Re:ewww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hope buyers realize that all they are doing is changing kidnapping standard operating procedure

      kidnappers will now locate the chip probably with nothing more than a $20 standard wall stud finder, then reach into the victim's skin with sharp nosed dirty pliers and toss the chip on the street. then probably send the victim's family a picture of the gaping wound for proof of untraceability and bonus horror factor

      ewwww

      Since they usually implant them in the arm it'd just be easier to remove the whole arm then you can send it to the relatives so they can check finger prints and DNA. Also it'll leave them with a keepsake if they can't raise the ransom money.

    4. Re:ewww by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a scene from a low budget horror movie to me.

    5. Re:ewww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is a place for the horror factor in this business apparently...it's great for convincing the family to pay up sooner. There is a recent case (it happened within the last year) of a Plastics Surgery practice run by a father and son team of MD's working out of Baja catering to US patients looking for bargain basement prices on their cosmetics procedures. They were making big bucks putting up their patients in a Luxury Spa Resort just south of Rosarito (10 miles south of the Tiajuana/US Border) where they could get their various facelifts, tummy tucks, etc for half of what they would pay in the US. Problem is, the Dad and Son had a thing for big fancy cars and showing off how much money they were making. That drew the wrong kind of attention. The son was kidnapped, and the kidnappers sent a finger every few days until the family paid up... They paid up as quickly as they could (it takes time to convert your assets to cash you know) and the son was returned, but not before losing all but the pinky finger on his right hand. Makes it hard to operate that way I'm afraid. Between stuff like this and the war between the Cartels the Federales, none of my friends go surfing down there anymore.

    6. Re:ewww by fyoder · · Score: 1

      then reach into the victim's skin with sharp nosed dirty pliers and toss the chip on the street. then probably send the victim's family a picture of the gaping wound for proof of untraceability and bonus horror factor

      Better still, just send the device itself. It could lead investigators a merry chase through the postal system, and would be a clearer and less unpleasant identifier than a body part.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    7. Re:ewww by tombeard · · Score: 1

      No. Dig out the chip and mail it with the ransom note.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    8. Re:ewww by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      And the device still goes into panic mode. Then it comes down to response time of the organization that implemented it and the local law enforcement.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:ewww by swillden · · Score: 1

      Much less effective than sending an ear. Maybe if the chip is in the hand, send the whole hand, chip and all.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:ewww by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Because, the RFID chip would probably let even mexican grade technology identify the body in the ditch as the person you are collecting a ransom on.

    11. Re:ewww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That would be counter-productive. The idea is that when the larger device can no longer communicate with the implant that alarms go off.

      But then, considering that last night the neighbor's house alarm went off at 1am and stayed on until 3,and everybody ignored it because it's always going off, that we'll see a similar effect with these.

    12. Re:ewww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or trying to fake death as... ? er.... nevermind. ;-)

    13. Re:ewww by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      and would be a clearer and less unpleasant identifier than a body part.

      Kidnappers don't want it to be less unpleasant. They send a finger not to identify the person but to freak the family out so they pay up ASAP. Sending an electronic device isn't nearly as motivating to the people that have to find a way to come up with the requested money.

  16. Useless by Yossarian45793 · · Score: 1

    Why not just carry the larger device with the GPS and transmitter and forget about the injectable chip? Either way you get the same protection. Unless of course you're relying on criminals being stupid in which case you might be able to convince them that the satellite can actually track the injectable chip.

    1. Re:Useless by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that if you get near someone elses GPS/transmitter rig that they too carry that it will start sending your RFID tag data to the satellites also...just a guess.

    2. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea is that if you get near someone elses GPS/transmitter rig that they too carry that it will start sending your RFID tag data to the satellites also...just a guess.

      RFIDs have a very short range, under 450 feet. If you are that close to a working one of these GPS units that isn't yours, maybe you should just yell for help.

  17. Re:Nice when the victims make it easy to find them by PalmKiller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought in mexico the police and "the organization" are one and the same.

  18. Investing ideas by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 1, Troll

    Xega sees kidnapping as a growth industry and is planning to expand its services next year to Brazil, Colombia and Venezuela.

    Sweet! Now I know where to move my 401K money! I need to find the ticker symbol though. Let's see KDNPP, nope, KIDN, nope, NAP, no...

    1. Re:Investing ideas by samcan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you forgot ABDCT, MISNG, and WHRAMI. :-)

  19. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by nickhart · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's a result of gross class inequality--which is the REAL pity.

  20. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

    Well, there is also the risk of cancer, but hey.

  21. Cure the symptom, not the disease? by LGagnon · · Score: 0

    Here's an idea: Instead of wasting money, time, and medical work on chipping the rich, how about fixing the poverty crisis in Mexico? You know, the main source of crime? I'll never understand why the wealthy waste so much money on security when it would be better spent on decreasing/ending the problems that tend to cause crime in the first place. It'd work a lot better in the long run, especially since chipping won't protect them against the next tortilla riot.

    1. Re:Cure the symptom, not the disease? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell us how this will be done.

    2. Re:Cure the symptom, not the disease? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Here's an idea: Instead of wasting money, time, and medical work on chipping the rich, how about fixing the poverty crisis in Mexico?

      You fail to see the problem. It's not just the rich families which are abducted. It's middle class families, for only a few thousands of dollars. Things have really gotten bad in here. It's no use "fighting poverty" where corruption reaches nearly all judges.

    3. Re:Cure the symptom, not the disease? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      Instead of wasting money, time, and medical work on chipping the rich, how about fixing the poverty crisis in Mexico? You know, the main source of crime?

      While your reply sounds noble, the reality is that poverty isn't the main source of crime. Corruption is.

  22. Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The chip then sends radio signals to a larger device carried by the client with a global positioning system in it.

    WTF is the implant for? This sounds like SPOT which provides real-time satellite tracking and the ability to send 3 levels of messages (I'm okay, Help, and Emergency). And it doesn't cost nearly as much or require injecting stuff into the user.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by JSBiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had almost the exact same reaction - if the chip needs an external device, wth is the chip actually doing that couldn't just be in the external device.

      Also, If I kidnap some rich kid, the first thing I'm doing is tossing his cell phone, mp3 player, gameboy, and any other electronics that might secretly be tracking me, into the nearest garbabe can, or hell, just dump it on the sidewalk or street.

    2. Re:Wait, what? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I think that's precisely *why* the injected chip is there: because you can't just toss it into the street. Think of a deadman's switch setup: the external device sends a positioning signal as long as it's within range of the chip. As soon as it isn't within range, it sends an alarm or just stops sending a position. Either way, your paid-for tracking service is getting either an accurate report of where you are, or an alert that contains your last known position when you were separated from the external device, both fairly useful pieces of data.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea is to prevent the kidnapper from sending false location information. He cannot just take the GPS-device to some other location to distract the attacker.
      Nonetheless, I think every kidnapper would destroy the device when he finds it.

  23. Things are worse than you thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 14 year old boy was recently kidnapped in Mexico in broad daylight at a police "checkpoint". His father reportedly paid over a million dollars to the kidnappers to try to get him back. The boys chauffeur and bodyguard were found shortly thereafter in the trunk of a car strangled to death. The 14 year old boys bullet riddled decomposing body was found shortly after that in the trunk of another car. Mexican police officers are believed to be complicit (helping with these kidnappings) in many of these cases and therefore the general public does not trust them. You can read more here...

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/latinamerica/la-fg-mexcrime22-2008aug22,0,5318804.story?track=rss

    The name of the 14 year old boy who was kidnapped and murdered was Fernando Marti.

  24. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Especially since you don't want them rooting around in your ass, or doing a "Choco number" (Domino Harvey, character's arm-removal technique...)

    Hell, may as well carry $2m in cash card and gamble on being kidnapped no more than 4 times...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  25. This technology was mentioned by toby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In a Brazilian movie called Manda Bala . Abductions are a thriving industry in São Paulo, Brazil, and the movie focuses on the common practice of cutting off all or part of a hostage's ear (or finger) in order to expedite a ransom payment.

    It is a generally thought provoking movie, with several memorable interviews, and at least some discussion of root causes of the problem (corruption in government among them, although the government of Luiz "Lula" da Silva may be making progress against it, despite so far losing the battle to protect protected areas of Amazon wilderness - a problem also intimately connected with corruption).

    However the movie is deeply marred by the inclusion of the anonymous São Paulo businessman, "Mr M" - a self-obsessed, vacuous nitwit, apparently American and perhaps a conveniently interviewable associate of the American filmmaker? whose ego was no doubt unduly boosted by his part in the film. Unfortunately, whatever this individual had to say about being "chipped" is unlikely to betray any insights: In a city known for violent carjackings, this guy's response was to bulletproof his ostentatious Porsche, instead of simply driving a less conspicuous car. I stopped caring about his fate very early into the film; one is tempted to say he need not worry about being kidnapped as nobody would miss him to pay a ransom.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:This technology was mentioned by mangu · · Score: 1

      In a city known for violent carjackings, this guy's response was to bulletproof his ostentatious Porsche, instead of simply driving a less conspicuous car

      What's the point in being rich if you can't spend it? In his place I'd do exactly the same.

      If you have money that was legally earned, you owe no apologies to anyone, you are entitled to it. Do you think the law allows some immoral ways to earn money? Change the law. I see no point in criticizing people just because they have money.

    2. Re:This technology was mentioned by toby · · Score: 1

      If you want to spend your (allegedly honestly earned) money ostentatiously, I recommend Monaco over São Paulo on common sense grounds. (If we rewind to the premise of the article: Kidnapping is a real risk for the wealthy in some countries.)

      I didn't criticise him because he had money. I criticised him for being vapid, obnoxious and foolish; being rich exempts no-one from those faults, as your celebrity culture dazzlingly proves. And he almost ruined an otherwise intelligent film.

      --
      you had me at #!
    3. Re:This technology was mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but think about it, as a local drug dealer i drive a 1992 toyota corolla. I could drive a 7 series BMW, but honestly, who's going to think that the guy in the shitty corolla is selling drugs. Take your pic, a ballin car, or anonymity. I'd choose anonymity any day.

    4. Re:This technology was mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lula da Silva making progress about what? Most Lula's ministers have been caught in serious corruption scandals in recent dates...

    5. Re:This technology was mentioned by mangu · · Score: 1

      I recommend Monaco over São Paulo on common sense grounds

      If it's a question of common sense, Rio de Janeiro trumps both São Paulo and Monaco. Prices a tenth of Monaco's and kidnapping ratio a hundredth of São Paulo's.

      Take the neighborhood where I live for instance. Big houses cost the equivalent of US$2 to 3 million, and a four-bedroom apartment goes for US$350k. Now how's that compared to a single-bedroom apartment in Monaco? How many layers of bullet-proofing can you get for your Porsche at that price?

    6. Re:This technology was mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one is tempted to say he need not worry about being kidnapped as nobody would miss him to pay a ransom.

      The same might be said of the circa 2% of the population, there, who make more than US$1200 per month - and act as if they're not really part of the problem; or as if they were all of everything that there really is or matters. (Imagine a 2% head of foam on your beer. Now sneeze. That's how important they really are.)

      And it's a dead certainly regarding the ~ 5000 families (or 20,000 individuals) who reap about 40% of their GNP.

      Taxes account for about another 40%. Leaving 98% of their pop. of sorry ________'s to scrounge, kick and scrabble for about 20% of the GNP of the world's 12th or 10th economy. That's probably somewhere between Bangladesh and Vanatuatu.

      But he will be missed by his insurance company. And banker (a U.S. bank, if he's really rott.. er, well-off). And personal security service providers (offficial, non-official, extra-official, officious.... etc.). And car armor company, and... the whole paranoiaplex.

      But, why worry ? There's always something new. New frontiers. New clients. China, for example. And everyone's favorites : eastern Europe - all the way to Malaysia.

      As for losing personal body parts, p-l-eaaase ! That's what peon--- er, loyal aides, are for. Really! Ever since way back when, at the very least! Chip the pe--- er, loyal aide/personal-secretary/attaché. Have him/her/it accompany you everywhere (yes, everywhere!), carrying the 'football'. The rest is pretty much humdrum.

      I realize things are quite different in the U.S., and improving readily in relation to distribution of wealth, education, opportunity, respect for humanity, civil rights, und so wieder.... So, it is probably quite shocking to your sedate and well-padded, er, cushioned, lifestyles.

      Enjoy !

    7. Re:This technology was mentioned by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      I see no point in criticizing people just because they have money.

      I see you aren't a Democrat.

    8. Re:This technology was mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody would miss him to pay a ransom.

      "Return of Red Chief", huh?

  26. Statistics! by toomanyairmiles · · Score: 1

    It's pretty dreadful in Mexico in 1992 there were 46 reported kidnappings, by 1999 there were 402 kidnappings a year - columbia is worse in 1992 there were 464 kidnappings by 1999 that had risen to 972!

    You can also get some data on average payouts here - just in casehttp://danger.mongabay.com/kidnapping_stats.htm you need to update your KRE insurance.

  27. Confucius say by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    Confucius say "Subcutaneous chip better than laundry tag. Chinese steam iron very hot!"

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  28. So Austin Powers by Lucas123 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Images of Fat Bastard

  29. Guess who's sponsoring these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA, need to track those 'kidnappees' in case they 'sneak' over the Mexico-US border!!

  30. fear fear fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish people would stop being so afraid of everything

  31. Not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine., the police find you and the criminals, but how much will the police demand of the ransom money not to take you hostage again ?

  32. Unfortunate accompanying image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the thumbnail image of the thumbnail image loaded on the front page, I thought it was an object being inserted into someone's pee-hole. I'm not going to be able to unthink that (and now, dear reader, neither are you), so I'm going to have to hide Idle stories from the front page...

  33. OK I must be missing something... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    so... as well as the inmplanted chip the abductee also has to carry a separate GPS transmitter? In which case I'm not seeing the point of the implant...

  34. next time... by extirpater · · Score: 1

    i'm going to use a jammer when kidnapping

  35. urk.... by thermian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe its because of my background in nursing, but, um, the lower finger in the picture didn't look like a finger to me on first glance...

    I'd say what it did look like, but I don't know what the slashdot filters are like. Lets just say I had to remove a soup spoon handle from one once during a shift on casualty and leave it at that.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    1. Re:urk.... by lantastik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot and filters have never been used in the same sentence before. I'll help you:
      penis, phallus, schlong, wang, schmeckle, junk, package, et al

    2. Re:urk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the lower finger has a clearly visible fingernail, I'd say it wasn't your background in nursing that caused your mistake. Just your dirty, filthy mind, you pervert.

    3. Re:urk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has a fingernail!

    4. Re:urk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't notice the fingernail on the thumbnail, either. I think parent refers to the impression before clicking the link.

    5. Re:urk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Considering that the lower finger has a clearly visible fingernail, I'd say it wasn't your background in nursing that caused your mistake. Just your dirty, filthy mind, you pervert."

      Whoa, wait a minute...you guys don't all have penisnails?

  36. Now we're getting somewhere. by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 1
    I've wondered about that myself. Here's a country that has a shit load of oil, great tourism trade, and like China, has a bunch of manufacturing from the US. So what's the deal? Why is there so much poverty. So, I started think'n. Not a good idea usually, but never the less, it happens.

    Mostly a dysfunctional and corrupt Government. But why do the people allow it to stay in power?

    That's because the rich folks like it that way. Mexico has a HUGE disparity between rich and poor (we're getting there ourselves) and one of the reasons is because the rich are rich and they want to stay that way.

    What will change it? A revolution. It may not have to be bloody, but a huge shake up. Maybe, they can get away with a small one like we had in the 1930s. But, Mexico will need their own Roosevelt. Now, I know there's some criticism about him and how his policies didn't necessarily do anything. But that's not the point. The point is folks perceived a change. The thought that finally, there needs were being addressed.

    I'd rather have to give half my wealth away then have all of it taken away. -- Joseph P. Kennedy.

    No, I don't think WWII bailed us out. But that's another post.

    1. Re:Now we're getting somewhere. by ChibiOne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But that's not the point. The point is folks perceived a change. The thought that finally, there needs were being addressed.

      After 70+ years of the same authoritarian, corrupt, one-party PRI government, we thought change and democracy had finally arrived when oposing party's Vicente Fox became president in 2000. The only change that we got was that the corrupt officials were now from PAN party instead of PRI. And the 2006 elections managed only to divide the population thinking the other side was the enemy, thanks to pseudo-left wing party PRD.

      OUr government officials, wheter from PRI, PAN or PRD, are only interested in power for their party, not the people's good. Once they get the votes, they forget about their promises and spend their terms living off our taxes.

      Why do we let it happen? The System is corrupt at its marrow. As you say, a true leader is needed. PRD's Andres Lopez deceived everyone into thinkink he was the one, yet after his loss, all his actions show that he was only interested in power for power's sake. Same for incumbent President Calderon. They are all the same.

    2. Re:Now we're getting somewhere. by sponga · · Score: 1

      During WW2 the Mexicans had a chance to have a road paved all the way from the North Tijuana all the way down to Cabo.
      They refused to allow us to build the road and I think that has prevented their economy from expanding.

      Think of it, a road from Mexico City to Los Angeles and Houston.

    3. Re:Now we're getting somewhere. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      They are all the same.

      We are almost done with GW Bush, and you are welcome to him. Maybe he can do for Mexico what he has done for the US.

      I can see it now: The Global War on Kidnapping

    4. Re:Now we're getting somewhere. by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      You're joking, right?

  37. well, there's money in it. by toby · · Score: 1

    What, you don't believe in the "free market"?

    --
    you had me at #!
  38. Maybe I'm stupid... by Keeper · · Score: 1

    But what's the point of having a chip implanted when an external device is still required?

  39. Isn't this by Markvs · · Score: 1

    Straight out of the Cyberpunk 2020 rulebook? What they really need to chip those afraid of kidnapping is 7 levels of unarmed combat and a few of evasion...

    --
    46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
  40. Re:ewww EWWWW... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Or, they might pull a "The Recruit" and attach the tracker to a dog (or, ewwww, stick it in the dog's ass). Finding THAT dog might be easy withOUT the tracker... just look for a crab-walking dog (no, I don't have experience in such matters, but I have a vivid imagination...)

    Maybe it's better to put a "kill switch" into the tracker so the kidnapped can "suicide" if not rescued in under 10 hours. This switch could be a non-metallic, subcutaneous toxic strip they have to tap (3 times?) or pinch. Even if the family never ever gets the body, at least the kidnapped can end things on their own terms (unless bound and strapped to deny activating the pressure strip...)

    Hell. If that level of lawlessness persists, they might end up like on Eminiar VII in Star Trek's "A Taste of Armageddon"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_booth

    But, i am sure they will disintegrate happily if Kirk is not there doing his inflections and intonations and such...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  41. New market by ve2asu · · Score: 1

    In other news, market for thinfoil clothing is exploding in Mexico...

  42. No kidnapping necessary now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just modify a shoulder launched missile to home in on the beacon.

    You have 2 hours to send the money or we blow up one of your chipped family members.

    Remember radio range is just a function of gain at my end. I get a big dish in the back of a fiberglass van get the initial target and range.
    Fire the missile, it picks up the close in beacon at 100'.
    Boom.

    A person concerned the right target was engaged would want eyeballs on the target to confirm the tracking at some point reasonably close to launch time.

    1. Re:No kidnapping necessary now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather than your crazy plan full of bells and whistles why not just aim the missile at their fucking house?

  43. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, it's the result of the War on Drugs.

  44. if people stopped being afraid, by toby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It would be so much harder to manipulate elections. Then people would be able to think about actual issues instead of electing the Repub^W guy who promises to magically get rid of all the bad people.

    Anyway, Americans only need to turn off the TV, and shun Hollywood: That's where crime and violence 24 hours a day (whether news or fiction) is designed to keep you all in a continuous state of fear. And it's working beautifully. In America (and its satellite states), strangers are terrified of each other. That's not true of many other countries and cultures, and we can blame Rupert Murdoch for the global infantilisation and tabloid-isation of media that could be used for intelligent and progressive purposes.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:if people stopped being afraid, by FormerUpper · · Score: 1

      It would be so much harder to manipulate elections. Then people would be able to think about actual issues instead of electing the Repub^W guy who promises to magically get rid of all the bad people.

      Anyway, Americans only need to turn off the TV, and shun Hollywood: That's where crime and violence 24 hours a day (whether news or fiction) is designed to keep you all in a continuous state of fear. And it's working beautifully. In America (and its satellite states), strangers are terrified of each other. That's not true of many other countries and cultures, and we can blame Rupert Murdoch for the global infantilisation and tabloid-isation of media that could be used for intelligent and progressive purposes.

      It would be so much harder to manipulate elections. Then people would be able to think about actual issues instead of electing the Repub^W guy who promises to magically get rid of all the bad people.

      Anyway, Americans only need to turn off the TV, and shun Hollywood: That's where crime and violence 24 hours a day (whether news or fiction) is designed to keep you all in a continuous state of fear. And it's working beautifully. In America (and its satellite states), strangers are terrified of each other. That's not true of many other countries and cultures, and we can blame Rupert Murdoch for the global infantilisation and tabloid-isation of media that could be used for intelligent and progressive purposes.

      Not true of other countries? Like Mexico? RTFA

  45. Scram! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need to dig out the chip or smash the extra "device", just scramble the frequencies it relies on.

  46. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by smith6174 · · Score: 1

    What exactly is the point of the implant in this system? Isn't the GPS device doing all the work? Sounds like just another excuse to put chips in people. Why don't we wait for a success story, like maybe 1 single victim located by the device.

  47. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by ChibiOne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No. It is the result of impunity and corrpution of the police.

    These thugs are not humble, starving individuals trying to feed their families. They are well organized criminal bands, with links to corrupt current (or ex) cops, who know that given the inefficient and corrupt justice system that prevails, know they can and will get away with it.

    Google for the Fernando Marti kidnapping and murder to get a glimpse of what's currently happening down here in Mexico.

  48. A note from here in Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A note from here in Mexico:

    I had a student once tell me she doesn't want to go to the US because, as you know, there are hundreds of nutcase students with guns who kill classmates at random.

    Kidnapping is the Mexican version of the same thing. It happens, at most, extremely rarely. You are far more likely, for example, to get hit by a car crossing the street or to die in an auto accident than to be kidnapped. However, it's the kind of news that makes for great headlines.

    What doesn't make for great headlines is the fact that between 2002 and 2006, the Mexican government was able to reduce kidnappings and dismantle a lot of kidnapping rings. They went up again in 2007 and the beginning of 2008, but a recent high-profile case where a 14-year-old kid was murdered has raised outrage again, so I'm pretty sure kidnapping rates will go down again.

    However, if you Americans (yes, I know, Slashdot is international) want to be afraid to go to Mexico because of the kidnappings, please stay out. The girls here love Americans, and I spent some time with a pretty girl 18 years younger than myself earlier this week, and will have coffee with a pretty girl 14 years younger than myself tomorrow.

    1. Re:A note from here in Mexico by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Very rarely on average, but the likelihood increases significantly for the children of rich Mexicans. The likelihood of being shot by a crazed gunman is much more equal across the population of all American students.

    2. Re:A note from here in Mexico by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The girls here love Americans, and I spent some time with a pretty girl 18 years younger than myself earlier this week, and will have coffee with a pretty girl 14 years younger than myself tomorrow."

      Women from many countries "love" Americans for lots of reasons, just ask Hans Reiser.

      As wise old Sgt Cody told me in the 1980s (referring to another place full of LBFMs):

      "The P.I. is like Disneyland. Enjoy the rides, but don't try to bring them home."

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:A note from here in Mexico by westlake · · Score: 1
      I had a student once tell me she doesn't want to go to the US because, as you know, there are hundreds of nutcase students with guns who kill classmates at random.
      Kidnapping is the Mexican version of the same thing. It happens, at most, extremely rarely. You are far more likely to get hit by a car,
      between 2002 and 2006, the Mexican government was able to...dismantle a lot of kidnapping rings

      .

      There is nothing random about extortion --- the victim's family will be extraordinarily wealthy by Mexican standards --- a very small sub-set of the general population.

      You would have to go very far back in U.S.history to find anything resembling an extortion "kidnapping ring." The response to the Lindbergh kidnapping in 1034 made this a very dangerous business to enter. The Lindbergh Kidnapping

    4. Re:A note from here in Mexico by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      There is nothing random about extortion --- the victim's family will be extraordinarily wealthy by Mexican standards --- a very small sub-set of the general population.

      Nope. They have what's called "Express kidnappings" where, as a Mexican described elsewhere in this thread, they just pick you up and take you around town to ATMs and empty as much money as they can. Doesn't matter if you're rich or poor.

  49. Schadenfreude by Nymz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is on Idle (our offtopic humor/meme/viral video/pictures section) because:
    - Once abducted, you have plenty of 'idle' time. (clever joke)
    - Slashdot editors think abductions are funny when they happen to Mexicans. (Schadenfreude)

    1. Re:Schadenfreude by fyoder · · Score: 1

      And thirdly because when genuine fluff gets posted to slashdot's main page, everyone bitches about it, so why not try something more serious.

      Might be time for the editors to let Idle RIP, they can't win. Perhaps a 'miscellaneous' section on slashdot would be a better catch all for fluff and whatever.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
  50. Rich Mexican Detector by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Friends ... I sell you a rich Mexican detector ... itsa wery nize ... you pointa da ding to Mexican ... if rice in blood ... itsa rich Mexican ... you kidnap ...

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  51. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    It is neither the War on Drugs nor "class inequality". While I think the War on Drugs is mostly retarded, it's not as though if that were to stop tomorrow kidnapping would stop with it. There's no correlation at all. And as for class inequality, please. That exists everywhere on earth, and the wealthiest people sure as hell don't live in Mexico.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  52. If they're so rich.... by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    ...why don't they use their wealth to move to a safer country?

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
    1. Re:If they're so rich.... by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      Maybe they love their home?

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  53. Catch & Release by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Why stop with just the wealthy, I think the US should start a program that donates transmitters to all Mexicans, even illegal immigrants as they're caught crossing the border.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  54. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good news everyone. It's a supository!

  55. In other news... by smith6174 · · Score: 1

    13% sales growth, with 2000 customers so far! At that rate, everyone in Mexico will have one in about 100 years.

  56. Stupid... by junkgui · · Score: 1

    Why would that even work... once the kidnapper sees the "larger device" they are sure to throw it away... Once you are a foot or so away the RFID would be out of range and then the best they could do is find the "larger device"... which is not you... Why not just buy a cell phone and call someone when you get kidnapped, it would be just as conspicuous.

  57. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I won't call you crazy. People who don't feel secure (and if you're a middle-to-upper-class person in Mexico, you have much reason to feel insecure!) are easily taken in by gimmicks like this.

    Even if the GPS thing were built into the chip, what good would it do? The first thing kidnappers would do would be to dig it out.

  58. Panic button by bicho · · Score: 1

    Well, if you can alert people as the kidnapping is taking place, it certainly serves at least for one purpouse.
    You don't need to wait for a call to know a relative has been kidnaped. and you can take action sooner.

    --

    errera hunamum ets
  59. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by robmv · · Score: 2, Funny

    and after I read your comment, you signature crossed my mind as "My inner cavity..."

  60. Well, I'm safe by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    I don't have a dime(peso) to my name.

    --
    What?
  61. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by spud603 · · Score: 1

    Mexico has among the highest income inequality in the world. I'd argue that income inequality is pretty tightly correlated with class inequality (large factor).
    Combine that with corruption and the US's `economic' policies toward Mexico and I think there's a good argument for class inequality being a big part of the issue.

  62. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

    Now we know what Goatse is. That guy's a billionaire that just wants to insert the device.

  63. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    Er, well, not quite true. According to this list the second wealthiest person in the world lives in Mexico. So does the person ranked 87th in the world.

  64. Wrong way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poverty does not cause crime. Crime causes poverty!

    Do not think that most poor Buddhist subsistence farmers are criminal class.

  65. Border corssing by McFly69 · · Score: 1

    Great!! Now we will know if they decide to cross any border illegally.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    1. Re:Border corssing by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Great!! Now we will know if they decide to cross any border illegally.

      Wealthy Mexicans don't have to cross illegally. They just get visas.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  66. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by richardellisjr · · Score: 1

    Never heard of Carlos Slim have you, second richest person on earth and lives in Mexico.

  67. Correct: It's not true of many other countries. by toby · · Score: 1

    Travelled much?

    --
    you had me at #!
  68. Root cause by billy8988 · · Score: 1

    Technology won't be the solution if you do not solve the fundamental problem which is the wedge between haves and have-nots.
    That wedge can be calculated by Gini Coefficient (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient), which is basically a number between 0 and 1.
    If it is 0 then everyone in the population has equal amount of everything and if it is 1 then one person has everything, rest have nothing.

    This image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gini_Coefficient_World_Human_Development_Report_2007-2008.png) shows the index for various countries.
    When the value reaches closes to 50, then you will see all these kidnappings and gated communities for rich.

    Brazil has the highest value among developing countries and surprise..surprise...it has the highest kidnappings (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9A01E5DE1F3CF930A25751C0A9649C8B63).

    US's gini indices (from Wiki) over the last 40 years are
    1967: 39.7
    1968: 38.6
    1970: 39.4
    1980: 40.3
    1990: 42.8
    2000: 46.2
    2005: 46.9
    2006: 47.0

    Buckle up ladies & gentlemen...kidnapping culture is not far away from us.

    1. Re:Root cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality disagrees with your socialist handwaving.

      http://www.nationmaster.com/plot/eco_inc_dis_ric_20/cri_tot_cri_vic/flag

      Kidnapping culture certainly isn't far away (it already happens in Arizona and Texas, carried out by the same groups), but it's because the government won't guard the damn border.

  69. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by gewalkeriq · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, you're right. I'll wait for the "Hollywood" version of this technology where the constraints of physics, etc. are swiftly banished by handwavium, ignorefactium and the ever popular technologyisjustmagicium.

  70. Re:ewww (Might need a better device than that.) by synth7 · · Score: 1

    I'm not quite sure a stud finder is going to do the job here... even one that detects by sensing the ferrous nails. Do RFID chips set of metal detectors in airports?

  71. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by dedazo · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's a pity this is featured in what is supposed to be the "funny" section of Slashdot, although "funny" is probably stretching it a bit to begin with.

    I lived in Mexico City for four years. I went to college there. Kidnapping is not a joke there, and if it was bad back then, I can only imagine how bad it is now. In all honesty, fuck Slashdot for putting this up. Getting the body parts of your relatives in the mail (or finding your child murdered in the trunk of a car) is not funny.

    BTW, the posting on this section is completely fucking broken.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  72. Correlation != Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you look on the same page, it shows a graph of Mexico's GINI Coefficient slowly going down, yet the number of kidnapping crimes in Mexico have been going up.

    Hmm... instead of Mexico's kidnapping crimes being related to some mystical number, perhaps the reason why Mexico's crime level has to do with government corruption?

    1. Re:Correlation != Causation by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      You lost me at Correlation !=Causation. Seriously...what yells "I'm a college Freshman!!!" louder than this stupid cliche? Congrats on taking a Logic 101 class. Please refrain from such intellect-insulting cliches in the future...

    2. Re:Correlation != Causation by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      You lost me at Correlation !=Causation. Seriously...what yells "I'm a college Freshman!!!" louder than this stupid cliche?

      I would say that attacking the title of his post because you consider it a cliche, while completely ignoring the arguments he presented, that yells it much louder.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Correlation != Causation by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Um, I believe the poster started with a given that nearly everyone agrees with (Corr != Cause) and expounded upon it to build an argument - you started with a given, mocked it by calling it a cliche, and ignored the substance of the argument.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    4. Re:Correlation != Causation by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Arguments with REAL substance don't need to rely on tired cliches. You can't just yell causation!=correlation without picking apart the original post's claim of said correlation.

      As it goes in college classes everywhere, "Crime rates are higher when ice cream sales are up". There is absolutely NOTHING WRONG with this correlation, until I infer causation when I say, "so Ice Cream causes crime". But until I make that logical error, there is nothing wrong with posting correlation in support of one's argument (and indeed most of us have done so in many a college paper)

      Don't yell at me and say causation!=correlation when I've made no statement inferring correlation. Then, when I do make an erroneous correlation, don't yell causation!=correlation at me and be done with your argument. If you want to be insightful, explain the intervening variables that make my correlation erroneous.

    5. Re:Correlation != Causation by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      No, this is not a cliche. When building an argument of any kind (legal, mathematical, whatever), you start with a given and you work from there.

      Cliches are for emotional interactions and bad movies; there is no such thing as a cliche when constructing solid arguments - we call this building from a solid foundation.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    6. Re:Correlation != Causation by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      It has become cliche, especially on slashdot, because it is misused. Correlation does not PROVE causation is the correct statement, but slashdotters gotta throw in the correlation!=causation, when the original poster is making no such claim. Just by pointing out a particular correlation exists, does not mean the original poster is implying causation. So in short, posting correlations on slashdot!=causation.

    7. Re:Correlation != Causation by religious+freak · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's a stretch to make a case that the OP was trying to state that there was a causation factor in their argument. From OP:

      Brazil has the highest value among developing countries and surprise..surprise...it has the highest kidnappings (emphasis mine)

      ... OP quotes stats...

      Buckle up ladies & gentlemen...kidnapping culture is not far away from us.

      By saying kidnapping culture is not far away from us, the OP is making the implicit assertion that one causes the other.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    8. Re:Correlation != Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't just yell causation!=correlation without picking apart the original post's claim of said correlation.

      Which is exactly why he DIDpick apart the original post's claim of said correlation.

  73. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bah, the flintstones had that technology thousands of years ago.

  74. Re:Nice when the victims make it easy to find them by thewils · · Score: 1

    So it's pretty likely that if you get "Chipped" you will show up on the bad guy's radar and you'll get kidnapped since they know exactly where to find you. They also know which body part to return to your family as proof that they have you.

    Si officer, that is Raoul's chip in his big toe in that box you have.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  75. Big problem in Latin America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a serious problem in Mexico and in lots of Latin America, i dont know if this solution is any good, but some sort of technological solution will need to be found. The political problem won't be solved any time soon as much of this is related to US drug prohibition. Last week, in a single day there were 22 kidnappings in northern mexico. Part of the problem is that drug gangs are looking for new business and kidnapping is very lucrative, and they have the help of corrupt police.

  76. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    He was an early beta tester of the program. The size of the device has been reduced to slightly under half so as to cause much less discomfort.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  77. Mexican chips by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    http://www.paradiso.com/
    They're just handing them out. No wonder the sales figures have gone up.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  78. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by credd144az · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the real flaw is that I'm not a cat...

  79. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Panoramix · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the story is wrong. This company, "Xega" (website, in Spanish) seems to be offering two different products. One is the "Verichip", which seems to be a subcutaneous RFID chip intended for identification. Like for (very paranoid) access control, or medical emergencies.

    The other product is called "VIP" and seems to be a GPS + GPRS device. You press a button on that thing and it transmits your current position to some server.

    I see no indication that both gadgets are related in any way. Well, the website is all fluff, so I can't really say, but I think the story is mixing them up.

    Still, that "VIP" thing does strike me as rather useless, since the first thing a kidnapper does is point a gun at you and make sure you stay still, with your hands in view. And the second thing is emptying your pockets.

    And yes, I live in Mexico, and I've been kidnapped... well, just a couple hours, while I was being mugged. See I got off from work around midnight, hailed a cab in the street and boarded it. The driver took off, I even chatted with that fucker. But once we were in a dark-ish, lonely street, he suddendly stopped the car, pointed a gun at me, and two men from another car that was following us quickly got into the cab. One of them pressed a knife against my stomach and ordered me to "act naturally". They took me for the "ATM ride" (cash withdrawals from different ATM machines all over town, until all the cards were dry). They also got the cash I was carrying on me, of course, as well as my laptop (powerbook 5300... shit, I miss that ugly brick). They gave me back my wallet with my IDs, and some papers from work I asked them to take out of the laptop case. They dropped me off at a Metro station.

    This was back in '97 I think, in Mexico City. A month later I was living in Guadalajara, and haven't had any such experiences since.

  80. things by Neuropol · · Score: 1

    will ALWAYS be worse in Mexico ... than you thought.

  81. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    Wow. Two people. They managed to beat out Ukraine. I am shocked that my point is so soundly disproved.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  82. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    You could have gone from that list to the statistcs of multi-millionaires that just lists how many thousand are in each country. There are quite a few in Mexico. You could have also imagined that that one man and his family are a richer target than the entire rest of Mexico combined. Maybe they've been trying to abduct one of them all this time, and haven't gotten the right one yet?

  83. Next Step by MRB+Constant · · Score: 1

    The next step is to make implants mandatory.

  84. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    Nationmaster is a dangerous petard, here's the hoist for you. You'll not that the US with the greatest imbalance has less crime than Sweden with the greatest balance. By statistical standards there is very little correlation between crime and wealth distribution. Kidnapping doesn't seem to be well tracked by various sources I've looked at, so it's hard to say about that specifically.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  85. Three problems I have with this. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    • You have a chip in your body, so they'll chop your arms off.
    • The chip transmits to a larger device that you carry with you?!??!?! So what good is it? They'll take the larger device away!
    • This is the Mark of the Beast, from the Book of Revelations. The end of the world is coming, and so is the long-awaited Second Coming! (My girlfriend will be pleased to hear the latter, but not the former.)
    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  86. 1... 2... 3... call it! by religious+freak · · Score: 0, Troll

    I call number 666!!

    WOOHOO, I got it! Now bow to me, the temporary leader of the world!

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  87. Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point of the implant is that if you ever end up X feet away from the gps transmitter, it goes off. I also imagine it's failsafe in that it transmits normally every few minutes. A missed transmission is the same an an alarm.

    Not really useful except as an instant alarm.

  88. What's up with Idle, this story doesn't suck... by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    I've tagged this story with ehnotbadiguess. Do more stories like these and maybe I won't totally hate idle. Though I think this is probably placed better in YRO or tech

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  89. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by flewp · · Score: 0, Troll

    Discomfort?! Sounds more like a fun filled Saturday night to me!

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  90. Or throw you in a Faraday Sack by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Kidnapping for profit now will be easy

    1) Look for Rich person who is spotted by carrying "The Device"
    2) Stuff person into Faraday Sack - cloth bag with metal fibers woven into it
    3) Collect ransom money = Profit

    See - no magic needed

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  91. Novel Mexican wealth redistribution plan by leftie · · Score: 1

    1) Wealthy Mexicans get chipped to either foil kidnappers or buy latest trendy toy.

    2) Wealthy Mexicans get cancer from chips
        (RFID chips cause cancer, http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2007/09/11/rfid-chips-cause-cancer )
    3) Wealthy Mexicans die, allowing the Mexican Gov't to tax estates of now deceased wealthy Mexicans

    4) Government Profit!
    -----
    So... when do we get to chip the whole damn Walmart/Walton family?

  92. LA Times story.... by mikael · · Score: 1

    The LA Times ran an artice on Why Mexican business directors, doctors, and other professionals

    Under pressure from the federal crackdown, some gangs appear to be ratcheting up kidnapping and extortion to make up for shrinking drug profits.

    There is no question that kidnappings in Mexico are soaring, particularly in trafficking hot spots along the U.S. border, where criminals have found easy targets among business owners, doctors and other professionals who have prospered in the region.

    Last year, 438 Mexicans were reportedly abducted, according to official government statistics. That's a 34% increase over 2006. But it's believed to be just a fraction of the true number.

    MEXICO CITY -- When their 14-year-old son was snatched off the street by armed men in early June, the Marti family reportedly did what many wealthy Mexicans do in such a crisis.

    It was not to be. Fernando Marti's decomposed, bullet-riddled body was found Friday in the trunk of a stolen Chevy that had been abandoned in a working-class Mexico City neighborhood. For many, Monday's news was equally bad: Authorities said they had arrested at least one city police commander in connection with the crime, and that other cops might be involved.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:LA Times story.... by bozojoe · · Score: 1

      I really would not mind having a devastated, irradiated land south of the California border. Heck the oil might even still be worth something.

      --
      lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  93. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by droptone · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, Mexico's Gini coefficient has been getting better.

    --
    Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
  94. Good News Everyone by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

    etc. are swiftly banished by handwavium, ignorefactium and the ever popular technologyisjustmagicium.

    Well if they are banished I shall simply reinstate them with some Robobium, Diamondium and a Chronoton or two.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  95. Re:ewww (Might need a better device than that.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do RFID chips set of metal detectors in airports?

    Yes, I have troubles flying ever since I was implanted by anal probe.

  96. A lot worse than I thought! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Things must be a lot worse in Mexico than I thought."

    Yeah, I am surprised to hear there are rich people in Mexico.

  97. reverse by HandsOnFire · · Score: 1

    in soviet mexico, lower class chips upper class!

  98. Conspiracy nuts predicted this. by shaitand · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was predicted 10 years ago by the conspiracy nuts that these chips woudl make their way into humans. Shortly after, the chips being discussed started to be implanted in animals and now humans. Of course they are just mexicans so it hasn't made its way into real people in the first world yet but that is just around the corner. The mark of the beast has come. ;) First tracking (for YOUR safety), next they start encoding emergency health information on it. After all, who wouldn't want doctor house to know they are allergic to penicillin. Next they move the monetary system to the chip.

    1. Re:Conspiracy nuts predicted this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Of course they are just mexicans so it hasn't made its way into real people in the first world"

      WTF??? Could you be even more racist???

    2. Re:Conspiracy nuts predicted this. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'mexicans so it hasn't made its way into real people in the first world'

      Welcome to real life in a major first world nation. It isn't real until it happens to us. Brown people in third world countries like Mexico don't count any more than aids infested brown people being used as guinea pigs in Africa count. Hell the bums living in central park in New York don't even especially count.

      When something starts to impact upper-middle class Americans then it becomes real.

    3. Re:Conspiracy nuts predicted this. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      P.S. Mexican is a nationality not a race. If you failed to catch the blatant scathing sarcasm in my post then you should be referring to me a nationalist, not a racist.

      You on the other hand, make become a racist when you refer to American Hispanics as Mexicans or even Mexican-Americans.

  99. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

    Except gangs who kidnap people aren't poor victims of social inequality (you should be looking at muggings and such)

    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  100. oh crap by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    This guy has a GPS in his pocket, perhaps we should get rid of it. Seems more like an inconvenience to the kidnappers no real security. If the chipped person has to have a "real" device with them to receive the short distance transmissions and send them off somewhere it might as well be just the bigger device.

  101. Re:Nice when the victims make it easy to find them by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    Not that the system is foolproof, but nobody in their right mind trusts the cops in Mexico to do anything except collect their paychecks. Like in many sketchy countries, if you have the money to afford a private security contractor, they tend to work out alright because unlike the cops, who get their non-illicit income from taxes, the security companies need to keep having customers.

    Of course, there is plenty that can go wrong with this, but as long as the monitoring and response is controlled by a reputable company, it won't hurt to try.

  102. Wealthy Mexicans? by nilbog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wealthy Mexicans need to carry a device in addition to being chipped?

    Okay this just doesn't make sense - there are wealthy Mexicans?!?

    --
    or else!
    1. Re:Wealthy Mexicans? by stewbacca · · Score: 0, Redundant

      damn you....I just posted anonymously, only to find out that my racist comment is not only racist, but redundant as well...

  103. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by spud603 · · Score: 1

    My point was more that Mexico has a large per capita number of conspicuously wealthy people. Good point well taken, though.

  104. Unnecessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is ridiculous. People ought to be taught self-defense and even given some tool for self-protection, like a knife. Though, I don't know the statistics for the kidnappings; I'm unsure what to do for an infant, but injecting this device into them seems a bit drastic. Maybe there's a better way to remedy the situation altogether since this happens so often.

  105. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you say "I live in Mexico" I assume you are an expat. I'd like to know what exactly is the attraction of living in that country, assuming you do not work for a corporation that requires your presence there? Relatively inexpensive luxury homes? Cheap sex? I have traveled to Mexico and unless one has the desire to isolate themselves in a walled-off gated community of other expats, I can't see the attraction. Once you get beyond the faux friendliness of the population that they put on when they see you as a possible consumer, the Gringo-hatred runs hard and deep. Are whatever the other advantages are really worth it?

  106. What's a "Wealthy Mexican"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wealthy Mexican? Is that like Military Intelligence?

  107. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by bitrex · · Score: 1

    I didn't mean to post as an AC - I did not notice that I wasn't logged in.

  108. Haitians could really use this by X=X+0 · · Score: 1

    Kidnappings have become a way of life in Haiti where gangs use the tactic as their primary means of fund raising. If this technology is real, many people in Haiti would make use of it. It's an unfortunate state of the country that such a worry would become the way of life.

  109. Really Walking About With by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... A chip on one's shoulder !

    But it won't work unless they supply (for a feee, of course) personal 'spoofers' to clients with spouses and 'added obligations'. Suits you, Sir!

  110. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

    When I was living in Philadelphia, last summer, this happened to multiple victims for a few weeks. They even had a description of the perps, but I never heard any news of them getting caught.

    Anyway, glad you made it out alive. I would freak out if that happened.

  111. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Panoramix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Heh, no, I was actually born here, and I love living in Mexico. Yeah, that tale about the mugging probably gives off a different impression, but considering it's pretty much the only time I've been mugged in almost 40 years, I think that's not a bad record. In fact, I think Guadalajara is a remarkably nice place to live, though I don't think I can explain the "attraction". I could hardly be objective about it anyway.

    I've got American and British friends who live here (as you may know, there's a big expat community in Guadalajara, and in Ajijic near lake Chapala). I've never asked them about this, but I will now. What I can tell you now is, I don't think there's any particular objective advantage. I mean, neither luxury homes nor sex are cheap (I assume you meant good looking hookers there). Beer probably is, though, heh. Look, I'm not really up to date on the cost of living in the States. I guess Mexico may be a bit cheaper, but I'm sure it's not much cheaper.

    I also don't think there are serious disadvantages: we've got all the utilities and public services you're used to in the US, from highways to sanitation to very decent health care. You'll find all the amenities too, say shops, restaurants, entertainment... in fact, most are the same chains and brands, only a bit cheaper perhaps. And of course we've got broadband everywhere, which is probably the most important thing for /. people.

    So I guess it boils down to personal taste. Some people just like it. Maybe it's the locations, or the weather, or the slower pace. Perhaps healthier and tastier food? You know, we're famous for that shit. Or meeting friendly people with an interesting culture. Who knows?

    Oh, and about that last item: there certainly are gringo haters. From your experience, it seems that's the kind of people you've been meeting here. I'm sorry 'bout that, fwiw. There's also gringo lovers, that goddamn malinchista pricks, I find them really annoying, haha. But I've got to say, I'm convinced that most of the population is just sensible people no worse or better than in the US or elsewhere, and you can probably make good friends if you give them (and yourself) a chance.

    Say, if you ever find yourself stranded in Guadalajara, bored enough to overcome the natural distrust, drop me an email, I'll take you to a couple cantinas, and perhaps the lucha libre. And if you really behave yourself I may introduce you to some ladies. Maybe then you'll get the "vibe" or whatever it is. Or maybe you won't, but you'll probably have a laugh anyway. And no, I won't give you any shit about dumb gringo chumps, but I won't take any shit about smelly beaners either.

    Cheers.

  112. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Panoramix · · Score: 1

    Thanks dude. It was pretty freaky indeed. I somehow kept my cool during the whole thing, I think I even cracked a joke at some point... maybe that's why they gave me back my paperwork and stuff. But after I got home, I did freak out, bad. To the point of deciding to quit my job and move to another city, right then and there heh.

  113. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

    Once you get beyond the faux friendliness of the population that they put on when they see you as a possible consumer, the Gringo-hatred runs hard and deep. Are whatever the other advantages are really worth it?

    Where the heck did you visit or live in Mexico? I'm an American and lived there for 10 years and noticed none of what you're talking about. Sure, no-one likes Mexico City. Not even most Mexicans. But I lived in Mexico (not Mexico City) for 10 years and I was never treated anything but superbly. Faux friendliness? Nonsense! They're an exceptionally friendly people. Unless you're an *sshole, but then people aren't friendly to *ssholes in the U.S., either.

    Why live in Mexico? Why not? There's a world outside the U.S. and it's worth exploring. I'm back in the U.S. now and I do appreciate the U.S. more now than ever, but about the only reason not to live in Mexico right now is security.

  114. Oh, you're chipped? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    Oh, you're chipped? *meat cleaver*

  115. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

    It's a result of gross class inequality--which is the REAL pity.

    No, actually it's the result of corruption. You can make the argument that the class inequality leads to the corruption, but that would be a very weak argument.

  116. Ha ha ha!!! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Now I know who to kidnap!!!

    The equipment costs me all of $149!

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

    Now I can get the Mexican government to give ME kickbacks!

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

  117. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I'm from the US and now live in Sweden, and I have a very hard time believing that the crime rate here is higher, given that the US murder rate in the US is more than double that of Sweden.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  118. SATELLITES WON'T WORK by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Someone else mentioned this above, but I thought I'd make the point more prominent.

    There is no way in Hell that a satellite can track an implantable "chip". They are lucky if they can detect them from a block away with equipment that barely fits in a pickup truck!

  119. You are also racist if you don't vote for Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are also racist if you don't vote for Obama

    Let us ignore the fact that he is incredibly inexperienced, inconsistent, and is running as a tire-pump Jesus.

  120. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    This just in, All Crime is a superset of Murder. Do you need a Venn diagram? So Sweden probably has more property crime or something, even disregarding the theft perpetrated by taxes. Besides which, we were talking about correlations of wealth distribution and crime, not breakdowns and comparisons of crime types.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  121. I'm sure I'd love having that ripped out of me by StormShaman · · Score: 1

    GIZMO: It'll work. Come on, do it or Hacksaw will.

    NEO: Do what?

            The instant he hears the word, he knows.

    TRINITY: Clear.

    NEO: Oh, shit --

  122. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by Scr3wFace · · Score: 1

    The chip can work both ways, depends on who is looking for you!

  123. Gunther? Is that you? by OneIfByLan · · Score: 1

    Is this the reason why you need a skull gun?

  124. And if you're really smart -- by OneIfByLan · · Score: 1

    You put a kickass powertrain under the crappy Corolla exterior and line the exterior shell with kevlar. Just cause it looks wimpy and crappy doesn't mean it has to BE wimpy and crappy.

  125. Predictions come closer every day, don't they? by master_p · · Score: 1

    "You can't buy or sell without the mark"...coming to a chipping office near you.

    Big war involving East attacking the west? you bet.

  126. shopping list by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok. So now all I have to do is scan the crowd to see which rich bastard will give the best ROI on an abduction. A side effect of being wealthy is that they are often usually healthier than the masses and even if they can't provide a good ransom, they can give better prices when sold for parts.

    Now that they are electronically tagged for my shopping convenience and cross-referenced with financial databases, there is a lot less shot-in-the-dark guessing.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:shopping list by zsau · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it isn't a dumb idea. It is, and I'm never going to do it, for that reason and for others. But when there's so many good reasons not to do something, you don't need to bring up stupid or wrong ones like the PP did.

      --
      Look out!
    2. Re:shopping list by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      I agree with zsau.

      Just because someone chooses to use this technology does not make them cattle. Nor does it prevent them from trying to protect themselves with other means.

      For those worried about potential abuse of this technology - good for you. All technology should be questions and protected against the possibility of abuse.

      For those bitching and complaining against those that choose to use this technology.- go fuck yourselves. How dare you tell someone else what they can and cannot do of their own free will? This doesn not affect anyone that doesn't chose to become chipped, and as long as they understand the benefits and consequences, people can choose to do whatever they wish if they feel it protects them. For those that cannot see this as a positive thing then you have a lot to learn about personal freedom.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  127. Annex Mexico by bozojoe · · Score: 1
    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  128. Radio beacon telling crooks who's worth abducting? by D4C5CE · · Score: 2, Informative

    No need to even decode communications from the RFID implant - holding up a crowd at gunpoint, would-be hijackers may just have to detect the carrier frequency emanating from a person (with a device that even high-school students could build), and "abduct only the chipped" for maximum ransom.

    Moreover, their victims will be unfortunate enough to undergo removal procedures that are reported to be "one ugly mess" (didn't look up the original quote, IIRC it was by CASPIAN's Katherine Albrecht) even with the benefit of optimal surgical attention, which they are unlikely to receive - to the contrary, kidnappers on the run may consider it reasonable to quickly sacrifice "part of" their prey, making the "fear for life and limb" quite literal, with emphasis on the latter, while putting the abducted in a condition that will leave little time for negotiations.

  129. Re:Hmmm, what could be the problem here? by thegnu · · Score: 1

    There's also gringo lovers, that goddamn malinchista pricks, I find them really annoying, haha.

    I grew up in Mexico, and I always thought it was funny that my friend's dad would get 2 veintes of Pacifico shitfaced and start talking about how badass gringos were.
    "'uta...Pinches gringos... son...bien cabrones los pinches gringos"

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  130. Please make your pointless complaining stop. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    What the hell is the big deal? This is actually an interesting story. If you don't like it, then turn Idle off in your preferences. "Problem" solved, you fucking whiner.

    "NOOOOOOO! NOT CHANGE! I HATE CHANGE! IT OFFENDS MY ASPIE NEED FOR ORDER AND REPETITION!"

    Jesus.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Please make your pointless complaining stop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like it, then turn Idle off in your preferences.

      Not everyone has an account.

  131. Chips ? by justleavealonemmmkay · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't they use nachos ?

  132. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has been happening for two decades and nobody does more than give it press attention every once in a while, this marti case will be over in a couple of months and the ransom rate will be similar to its number now an 5 years ago

  133. Re: Wealthy Mexicans Getting Chipped in Case of Ab by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Any attempt at correlation between crime and anything else certainly does depend on what's included in the definition of "crime". I'm glad you also noticed that the fact that the US murder rate is more than twice that in Sweden does imply that there's something else included under "crime" to offset that, and there is certainly no reason to belittle me because I expressed interest in what that might be. (And my comment was no more off-topic than the parent.)

    Since you couldn't be bothered, I did a bit of research and it turns out that Sweden has quite a high rate of assaults. I find this a bit surprising, because it doesn't seem that violent here to me, but I've only lived here for a little over a year, so it's quite possible I'm missing something.

    This report, while slightly dated, might also be of interest.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  134. Mexico is a great place to live. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Most expats find that the friendliness is not faux. Friendliness to strangers is instilled in you when you grow up in Mexico. It is basic good manners and is basic politeness instilled even in the humblest of families. "Bienvenido a su humilde casa" (welcome to this your humble home) is a polite form of welcoming signalling that you will be looked after. It is a cultural thing that many USians and other foreigners fail to understand miserably.

    Rich people who seem showy will be a blanks for rip-offs everywhere. I personally have been the target of people trying to pull a fast one on me in places as diverse as Namibia (by both white and black scammers), Vietnam, Thailand, France or the UK (and needless to say Mexico itself).

    Such things happen when you are visibly different. Deal with it.

    As for all expats in Mexico living in gated communities, well, it just comes to show how little you know about Mexico. I have visited all of Mexico (all the 32 capital cities of all the states, plus many other innumerable towns and villages) and I can say with authority that expats not all live in gated communities. Not even in Mexico City. Very paranoid people do, but many other live like any other middle class people with the same apprehensions and joys.

    Honestly, to think that most expats are in Mexico only looking for hookers reflects on you rather than in the reality of the situation at hand.

    Most expats find the people friendly and welcoming, the climate benign, life not so hectic, the food delicious. Yes, there are serious problems, but even conceding that 1 person kidnapped a day is really bad, that still means more than 100000000 do not experience such problems and carry with their life undisturbed.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  135. There is no gun ban in Mexico by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Bar weapons reserved for the military, you can have guns for your personal protection.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  136. We need no leader. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    We need to assume our political responsibility individually.

    One messianic apparition will not solve the problems of the country, only the daily grind of ungrateful political work will eventually bear fruit.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.