Slashdot Mirror


Robotic Suit For Rent In Japan

xTantrum writes with an AP story that begins "A robotic suit that reads brain signals and helps people with mobility problems will be available to rent in Japan for $2,200 a month starting Friday — an invention that may have far-reaching benefits for the disabled and elderly."

202 comments

  1. Obligatory... by ScytheLegion · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new $2,200/month Robotic Suit Overlords.

    1. Re:Obligatory... by citizen_senior · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can't see that as being Redundant. They should be welcomed, starting Friday. But today is Friday !! Be welcome O Robotic Suit Overlords !!!!!

    2. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but does it run Linux.

    3. Re:Obligatory... by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Given that the name of the company that's making the suits is Cyberdyne, I think that's the single most appropriate use of the "overlords" meme I've ever seen.

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    4. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wait, this has got to be a joke surely?

      "Cyberdyne, a new company in Tsukuba outside Tokyo, will mass-produce HAL. Two people demonstrated the suits at the company's headquarters on Tuesday."

      Cyberdyne producing HAL!?

      Good god, are they TRYING to tempt fate? Expect to see exhausted pensioners in Japan running around the street while their robotic suits are running rampant.

    5. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude, now we'll have Iron Men roaming our streets. We are s...

      [TARGET VAPORIZED FOR TRYING TO WARN THE MEATBAGS]

    6. Re:Obligatory... by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Are they related to DataDyne?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    7. Re:Obligatory... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Be welcome O Robotic Suit Overlords !!!!!"

      That is Mr. Roboto to you sir!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dirty mind is a joy forever...

      I misread it as "$2,200/month Robotic Slut Overlords."

    9. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't be cool until it includes a robotic c*ck as standard ;-)

    10. Re:Obligatory... by d0rp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the suits are also called HAL (hybrid assistive limb), so you really have to wonder...

    11. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure you can install a pair of tweezers for the suit's handjob attachment.

    12. Re:Obligatory... by TheMidnight · · Score: 2, Funny

      Domo aregato, Mr. Roboto.

    13. Re:Obligatory... by AgentSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Cyberdyne, a new company in Tsukuba outside Tokyo, will mass-produce HAL. Two people demonstrated the suits at the company's headquarters on Tuesday."

      Cyberdyne producing HAL!?

      Good god, are they TRYING to tempt fate? Expect to see exhausted pensioners in Japan running around the street while their robotic suits are running rampant.

      You beat me to it.

      Humanity! We're just begging for it!
      Might as well have a company called the Seventh Seal run by a guy called Morningstar.
      When on the company's opening day he opens the large front doors that happened to be shaped
      like a large scroll with a wax seal. The company starts a large Web 2.0 AI network to control the entire
      defense system of the free world.

      You've been warned people! Warned I tells ya!

    14. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our depend-wearing overlords.

    15. Re:Obligatory... by Benfea · · Score: 1

      That's not the only allusion to machines that take over the world. I believe that same company has a product called "HAL 2000". Someone at that company has an incredibly sense of humor. :D

    16. Re:Obligatory... by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      "The truth is... I am Iron Gran."

    17. Re:Obligatory... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I'm loving how this is moded insightfull, and creeped out.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  2. fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'an invention that may have far-reaching benefits for the disabled and elderly'

    Not for $2200/month it won't.

    1. Re:fp bitches! by Splab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well it wont help in places where elderly are expected to take care of themselves - however in the civilized parts of the world where the government takes care of their elderly and disabled this will have huge benefits for all.

    2. Re:fp bitches! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Japan has has socialized health care. the majority of their hospitals and medical institutions are privately owned, but all medical bills are covered by the government. so it won't be a problem for lower income individuals to gain access to this technology in Japan.

      though in the U.S. you'll probably only see the wealthy wearing the $2200/month model, while the middle class will have to settle for the $1500/month one-legged version. but everyone else will have to stick with wheelchairs or walkers with tennis balls screwed onto the legs.

    3. Re:fp bitches! by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well it wont help in places where elderly are expected to take care of themselves - however in the civilized parts of the world where the government takes care of their elderly and disabled this will have huge benefits for all.

      You let me know what country takes care of their eldery to the tune of $2200 per month, because that's where I want to retire.

      Last I checked, most of those "civilized parts of the world" are either reforming their State pension systems or are planning to.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:fp bitches! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      Given the problems Japan is facing with socialized healthcare I doubt they're government is going to subsidize the use of this thing. Socialized healthcare is great until someone has to pay for it. That's the problem Japan is facing, not enough people to pay for the growing aging population.

      Such technology would see limited use not because of healthcare but because of cost versus value. I actually think $2200 a month isn't bad at all given the nature of this new technology. If this thing had been been introduced by an American company it would likely cost 10 times more because of perceived value. And the technology would probably be more utilitarian and require on-going support and maintenance.

    5. Re:fp bitches! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      To the tune of 26,400$ a year it won't here in the "civilized parts" either. Socialized health care has some benefits but it doesn't mean we can take money out of thin air. It will come down to a cost-benefit compared to other services, if more elderly can manage without or with less human assistance then it'll happen but it won't magically come on top of everything we provide today.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:fp bitches! by msromike · · Score: 0

      If it is too expensive it won't matter than can just raise taxes on the people that do work. If all elses fails than can just print more money. That's how civilized countries spend money they don't have.

    7. Re:fp bitches! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      in the civilized parts of the world where the government takes care of their elderly

      Government doesn't take care of the elderly, taxpayers do. If you are going to take my money and pass it on to the elderly then at least give credit where it's due.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    8. Re:fp bitches! by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What they should do is stop discouraging people from having supersize meals and chain smoking. And put heavy taxes on tobacco and fries.

      That'll help take care of the elderly :).

      --
    9. Re:fp bitches! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      what kind of problems are they facing? people getting the health care they need regardless of socioeconomic stratum? no one going bankrupt because of medical bills? health care costing a fraction of what it does in the U.S. while citizens receive better care and health results?

      i think you should do a little more research into the Japanese health system before saying banal platitudes like "socialized healthcare is great until someone has to pay for it."--what is that even supposed to mean? the government hasn't been paying doctors or hospital staff, and they're just now getting the bill? they've been using the same system for decades, and it's been paid for all this time. they just choose to pay for health care collectively and manage their health care system in a way that best serves public good. and the Japanese people seem perfectly happy with the system they have as it gets them good results.

    10. Re:fp bitches! by TheJasper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can quite imagine in my parts of the world this being a feasible benefit for the elderly *and* the disabled. This doesn't mean everyone over 65 is all of a sudden going to be outfitted like robocop. It means that if this technology will significantly improve someones standard of living then 26,400 isn't the issue.

      As for magically appearing...nothing ever does. First you have to have the machines. At the same time pretty much you need doctors, therapists and tecnicians trained to work with the machine. Then you have to probably teach people to work with it.
      It's not the money that will be a big problem but the support structure. Even so, I'm sure in 10-20 years you'll be seeing these things or similar ones on the same level as a wheelchair.

    11. Re:fp bitches! by azuredrake · · Score: 1

      I believe he's referring to Japan's very low birth rate in the past two decades, leading to a disproportionately old population retiring from the workforce comparing to the number of youth entering it, which in turn results in lower than projected revenue and higher than projected spending on social programs for the elderly.

      --
      Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
    12. Re:fp bitches! by Sparhawk2k · · Score: 1

      The point that Japan has a problem with an aging population is a reasonable one. There are a lot less workers to pay for their health care system now. Though I don't know the exact statistics on how they're doing so far...

      And I'm not trying to argue that we shouldn't have national health care programs in the US. Personally I'm all for it. But issues like the sizes of generations are important to consider.

    13. Re:fp bitches! by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well Denmark is spending more than that per month.

      Having such a suit means the elderly can get up and down stairs by themselves, go shopping on their own - that means freeing up workers and giving companies more people to hire, while we are currently feeling a bit of pain due to the financial crisis we still have more job offerings than people to hire.

    14. Re:fp bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Until they topple on their back and lie there like a poor turtle

    15. Re:fp bitches! by discord5 · · Score: 1

      the civilized parts of the world where the government takes care of their elderly and disabled this will have huge benefits for all.

      Living in a "civilized" part of the world with social healthcare with a disabled family member, let me reassure you that that the government would laugh at you in the face if you ask them for $2200 a month for this. They will happily provide you with a mint-condition wheelchair until the technology becomes affordable (as in not $2200 a month).

      I think there are a lot more useful applications for healthcare money (eg. help pay for life saving surgery, help pay for medication for the chronically ill, etc) than something as frivolous as robot-assisted-legs for an old man who can't walk up the stairs anymore.

      Don't get me wrong, I think it's great (hell, it's in fact AWESOME) that this technology exists and is available, but it would be a waste of taxpayer money to allocate healthcare funds to this while more serious cases can benefit more and probably cheaper.

      Also, in before flamewar containing the words "socialism", "hypocrisy" and "scam".

    16. Re:fp bitches! by meist3r · · Score: 1

      You let me know what country takes care of their eldery to the tune of $2200 per month, because that's where I want to retire.

      Last I checked, most of those "civilized parts of the world" are either reforming their State pension systems or are planning to.

      QFT! Strangely it's the "terrorist" or "developing" country where family still seems as it is. In our "civilized parts of the world" we usually send Grannie and Gramps into nursing home exile when they can't work anymore and didn't save enough.

    17. Re:fp bitches! by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      I'm 100% for socialised healthcare but I recognise that it has it's problems.

      care for young people and you get a healthier population.
      OAPs however just need more and more care, the more care they get the longer they live the more care they need etc etc.

      France has a fairly calous and cruel,but when it comes down to it, sensible system.
      If the hospitals can't cope(like during a heatwave or disaster) then they simply stop treating people over a certain age. Depending on how bad the situation is the age lowers or rises. There are cases of old buisnessmen having heart attacks but being refused treatment so it isn't even a matter of money.

      It's one way of dealing with the problem of limited budgets and unlimited health problems.

    18. Re:fp bitches! by compro01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      $2200 for now. Remember, this is a first-gen product.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    19. Re:fp bitches! by somersault · · Score: 1

      That's the beauty of it - with a robotic exoskeleton you won't need to retire! They can put you to use as power cargo loaders!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    20. Re:fp bitches! by smoker2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, because you would just donate your money every time you see an elderly person in trouble. Same as how you maintain the roads, and defend the country.

    21. Re:fp bitches! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You pay the government to take problems off your hand. Give credit where it's due.

    22. Re:fp bitches! by Feltope · · Score: 1

      Well Denmark is spending more than that per month.

      Ummm I don't speak Danish (err or Swedish sorry if I have the national lang. wrong)

      But as weird as it might sound (I am an American Vet.) I am looking to immigrate and at the same time learn a new lang.

      Now as weird as it may sound my Empathy outweighs my patriotism (at this point in the world economics) so I have been looking to immigrate for hmmm one or two years.

      As sad as it is (and I wish it wasn't) I have a problem with umm Challenged people, but with elderly people I am fine.

      With Challenged people my Empathy out weighs my duty so to speak (my heart bleeds for them) and thus I probably (sadly) can't help.

      But with just elderly people yes I would like to help.

      respond please at feltope@gmail.com perhaps you can hook me up with a local agency that can help me help others.

      thanks, Feltope

      --
      thanks, Feltope
    23. Re:fp bitches! by Feltope · · Score: 1

      oh if it helps! :-) I am a computer science engineer graduate and as strange as it may sound a Chef by trade ;-) I love cooking.

      --
      thanks, Feltope
    24. Re:fp bitches! by rprins · · Score: 1

      In some countries the government actually serves and reflects the opinions of it's population.

      So the government takes care of the elderly because the taxpayers want it to.

      --
      I know it sounds funny, which is what makes it so sad.

    25. Re:fp bitches! by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Your strange use of the word "Empathy" leads me to believe that you would not pass a Voigt-Kampff test.

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Also, it's not a proper noun, so it's not whoever you think it is either.

      --
      I hate printers.
    26. Re:fp bitches! by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      I hate printers.
    27. Re:fp bitches! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Well, the government pays people to look after the elderly with taxpayers' money, to be exact. I imagine that only a very small fraction of taxpayers ever personally help an elderly neighbour with their groceries, or offer to mow their lawn, sadly enough. Although that would work out a lot cheaper for the taxpayer in the end, I suspect.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    28. Re:fp bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent

    29. Re:fp bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's exactly the point, $2200 a month could be a good investement if it frees a young person to work (or even better, procreate) instead of spending time looking after an elderly person. It seems likely the cost of these will go down, while the cost of human assistants will go up.
      A country with less Xenophobia or more Technophobia might have elected to import cheap workers from poorer neighbouring countries, instead. I'm honestly not sure what my country will end up doing when it hits this problem in a couple of decades, but I'm glad we have Japan going ahead of us. :)

    30. Re:fp bitches! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Old people sleep a lot, so they could maybe share one suit between two or three. Hope it's washable!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:fp bitches! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Well it wont help in places where elderly are expected to take care of themselves - however in the civilized parts of the world where the government takes care of their elderly and disabled this will have huge benefits for all.

      What's civilised about taking money off people their entire lives, then giving some of it back later on, if they're considered disabled enough to need it? Imagine if you paid taxes your entire life, then either died before retirement or weren't crippled and couldn't get the robot, you'd have wasted your money.

    32. Re:fp bitches! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Informative

      "socialized healthcare is great until someone has to pay for it."--what is that even supposed to mean?

      It means that while a more equitable distribution of certain resources is a desirable situation, it doesn't solve the problem of providing the aforementioned resources.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    33. Re:fp bitches! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I love how the makers of this crap try to say it's for the elderly and disabled.

      they tout the "we're working for humanity" line when they in reality are simply making something that rich geeks will buy/rent at insane prices.

      anyone know any decrepit elderly that have a huge disposable income that wants to become Mecca-Shiva?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    34. Re:fp bitches! by Splab · · Score: 1

      Not quite sure what you want.

      Danish immigration can be found here: http://www.nyidanmark.dk/en-US

      However you are probably going to find yourself a bit unwelcome (depending on who gets elected in a month) (US=Bush=unfriendliness), and on top of that we got some very strict immigration rules (which suck).

    35. Re:fp bitches! by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, they've got a robotic suit. I'm picturing armies of elderly gundams. They can take what they want - who's going to stop them?

    36. Re:fp bitches! by digitalgiblet · · Score: 2, Funny

      You let me know what country takes care of their eldery to the tune of $2200 per month, because that's where I want to retire.

      Last I checked, most of those "civilized parts of the world" are either reforming their State pension systems or are planning to.

      Let me further refine that statement by saying "...what country takes care of their elderly to the tune of $2200 per month FOR ROBOTIC EXOSKELETON SUITS WITH WHICH TO DOMINATE THE YOUNG, ROBOTIC-EXOSKELETON-FREE KIDS ON THEIR LAWNS."

    37. Re:fp bitches! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I don't see why we'd be unwelcome. There are quite a few of us that don't like him just as much as the rest of the world. Hell some of us are trying to escape.

      USA is the Britney Spears of countries. Came in with a flash but fucked it up quite early (in ages of country terms)

    38. Re:fp bitches! by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Don't hate the US people for Bush. Less than half of them voted for him.

    39. Re:fp bitches! by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      The patient's mobility will still be limited by how much battery reserves they can carry. This might be useful for letting the patient stand up to pull something off a shelf, but won't be useful for an extended shopping trip (barring a very long drop-cord).

      It is a step in the right direction, though.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    40. Re:fp bitches! by ghrom · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, in 'not so civilized' parts of the world elderly are not expected to take care of themselves, their families are.

    41. Re:fp bitches! by mrops · · Score: 1

      Nope, you are absolutely wrong. Recently, I read a study, can't seem to locate it now.

      It said that those who smoke and eat fries die early, if they are lucky in mid sixties. The other group, the healthy kind that live to 80s and 90s are the real burden on the health system.

      If you look at expenditure on health over a lifetime, the unhealthy kind are cheaper as they get sick die quick. The healthy kind cost more.

      So go grab that Big mac with large fries and a shake.

    42. Re:fp bitches! by mrops · · Score: 1

      oops, sorry, I said the same thing you did, didn't read "discouraging". Too early on a Friday morning.

    43. Re:fp bitches! by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I can quite imagine in my parts of the world this being a feasible benefit for the elderly *and* the disabled. This doesn't mean everyone over 65 is all of a sudden going to be outfitted like robocop.

      For the record, I live in North Carolina, America.

      Have you not seen the commercials for electric wheelchairs?

      "Come on down. Get your free electric wheelchair. We'll handle getting the money out of the government."

      If the government starts giving them out, they'll have to give them to everyone with a doctor's note. The wheelchair companies know which doctor to send you to. This would be no different.

      You claim that $26,400 is not an issue. That is very close to the median income of a working American. Your claim is that someone should be forced to work for a YEAR and turn over all the proceeds so that some random senior citizen can stand up without help. It may be the right thing to do, but it is most DEFINATELY an issue.

      Quality of life is important. But it is not my responsibility to guarantee it for you, or my right to demand it of you.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    44. Re:fp bitches! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      While the rest stood by and let it happen.

      --
      What?
    45. Re:fp bitches! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      But if it keeps the rain out, it will make a handy shelter. I just hope it's gentle with my... when going to the bathroom.

      --
      What?
    46. Re:fp bitches! by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't had much contact with patient care technology. $2200/month is almost bargain price considering the potential benefits.
      A simple voice synthesizer to fit on their wheelchair might set you back $3000. If you go for gadgets that might for example allow you to take a wheelchair down the stairs, expect to pay as much as you would for a small car.

    47. Re:fp bitches! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "oh if it helps! :-) I am a computer science engineer graduate and as strange as it may sound a Chef by trade ;-) I love cooking."

      Hey..you could go train under the guidance of the The Swedish Chef!!

      Ok....ok..I know the thread was for Denmark....but, that was the first thing that came to my mind.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    48. Re:fp bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we still have more job offerings than people to hire.

      Ever considered getting some wogs, or possibly some 'new Europeans'?

    49. Re:fp bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live that there are NOT heavy taxes on tobacco?

    50. Re:fp bitches! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "Where do you live that there are NOT heavy taxes on tobacco?"

      Japan does not have heavy taxes on tobacco (not where I live Japan is the country of topic):

      http://www.wesh.com/money/1823235/detail.html

      Funny how so many of them smoke (50% of the males) and yet so few die. Maybe they are smoking much better stuff than everyone else?

      quote: "The numbers have fallen steadily since their peak back in 1966, when about half of all adults indulged, compared with only about 30% now. But even today, about half of all Japanese men smoke. "

      --
    51. Re:fp bitches! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      I realize my comments probably violate your faith in socialized healthcare but I think my statement was quite clear.

      The elderly population is increasing while birthrate continues to fall. This means that while the number of people dependent on healthcare keeps growing the number of people contributing to the system, via taxes continues to shrink. Simply put, there's too much money coming out of the system and not enough going in.

      And that isn't the only problem. The system is also over-burdened. It's much like the problem being experienced in Taiwan where there are still enough people to pay into the system.

      In Taiwan it cost me $2 to see the doctor. Two dollars! Sounds great, but then what happens is that people end up going to the doctor for every little thing. Any time I got a cold I had people insisting I see a doctor.

      And what did that visit consist of? I sit down, the doctor asks whats wrong, I describe the symptoms and he quickly rattles off what I must be afflicted with. I don't even recall my blood pressure being checked or temperature being taken. He then types up a few things in his computer and hands me a small sack of pills. Small talk is out of the question.

      Doctors there don't earn particularly well so they end up trying to find ways to earn additional income. For a while they were making money by selling prescription medication on the side. More recently they've taken to opening private practices where patients can get better service but have to pay out of their pockets for it. It's illegal for a doctor working at a public facility to recommend a visit to his private office but they do it anyway.

      I also happen to have family in various countries in Europe so I also know the problems they face there. The most immediate being the government cutting back on services. It's bad enough in France that I have an uncle who got private health insurance last year in order to get the kind of coverage he needed.

      I had an uncle who had to wait a few months to get the exam he needed to see if he had lung cancer. My sister in law's grandmother also had to wait a few months for tests related to her heart attack. My grandfather had a stroke and lived another 7 years unable to walk or speak properly because the government didn't bother providing any sort of therapy. A recurring theme seems to be if someone is considered to old they don't bother with treatment especially if the condition is serious and potentially expensive. I could go on, I've got more examples.

      And ultimately, despite the high taxes supporting this system people still have to pay for a lot of things themselves. But the taxes are the worst. It's not for nothing that pretty much everything in Europe is nearly twice as expensive as it is in the US.

      Taxes are considerably lower in Taiwan and Japan I believe primarily because they still have large populations contributing to the system. They also don't really have to contend with immigration considering how draconian their immigration policies can be. Japan in particular is very selective with their immigrants, something that would never fly in the US or even Europe.

      Not that social healthcare doesn't have it's place, but it sure as hell isn't all that it's cracked up to be. I'd rather see careful, sensible regulation of the American system than have us dump it for the fiasco they have in Europe. I think too many people suffer from the green grass syndrome.

    52. Re:fp bitches! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      In some countries the government actually serves and reflects the opinions of it's population.

      So the government takes care of the elderly because the taxpayers want it to.

      -- I know it sounds funny, which is what makes it so sad.

      Please be more specific. Which countries?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    53. Re:fp bitches! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      You claim that $26,400 is not an issue. That is very close to the median income of a working American.

      Actually, the median income is almost twice that. Specifically, as of 2007, the median family income was $50,233. Even in 2004 the median income was $44,334.

      Regardless, 26K/year for a walking assistance device is still a bit of a stretch to give to everyone who wants one.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    54. Re:fp bitches! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      yes, Japan has negative population growth, and as a result there is not enough people to take care of the elderly, which is partly why the Japanese government is investing heavily in robotics and investigating the possibility of robot caretakers for the old.

      however, the health care system is not suffering from a lack of funding. the way the Japanese health care system works is that the government controls the cost of medical treatment down to minute details. at the moment it is fixed at a very very low rate, but it is still providing much higher quality care than the U.S. the Japanese people like this system because it benefits them.

      the only people who are complaining are doctors and private hospitals who say they aren't getting paid enough for their work. however, every two years the Japanese government and health industry representatives do get together to negotiate the the pricing system.

      the GP was simply pulling statements out of his ass without researching the actual situation. we all know that Japan has a negative growth rate, which does present some problems. but health care funding isn't one of them. there's a huge difference between not having enough workers to take care of the elderly, and not being able to fund the health care system. even if they had a privatized health care system, it would not change their labor shortage. all it might do is cause old people to not be able to afford health care.

    55. Re:fp bitches! by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      Oh I see, they will die young and we wont have to worry about them. And we can use the tax money we get to pay back everyone we owe, including social security...though most wont need it.

    56. Re:fp bitches! by Sparhawk2k · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. Thanks. Obviously a labor shortage is a big issue though automation could deal with a lot of it. I'd still be concerned about the money side of things but I guess that depends on how they're doing it and would still be an issue with a private system.

      With negative population growth they're having to pay for more people with less taxes. Or individuals are having to pay more taxes... Unless the current older population was all paying sufficient funds while they were younger and they've got enough saved to pay for them... Though I feel like people often don't plan that far in advance anywhere. They just continue to expect population growth forever.

    57. Re:fp bitches! by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      I read that as tobacco fries.

      Mmmm...
      tobacco fries....

    58. Re:fp bitches! by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Just remember this reaction the next time some politician starts talking about how rich we are and that surely we can give away x, y, or z. We're not that rich. Nobody's that rich as a country.

    59. Re:fp bitches! by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      The parent post was talking about individual americans and you're talking about a family of four which, last time I checked, has on average >1 wage earner in it.

    60. Re:fp bitches! by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      Actually there are people who donate more to help people out than they pay in taxes. The bottom half of the income distribution in the US pays almost no taxes. Some of them do, however, give to charities.

    61. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Mod this up as sad please. It's no coincidence that people can finally retire about the time their bodies are too worn out to be used.

    62. Re:fp bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know about the parent, but as for me, I do donate to the elderly. And I guarantee they get more of it when I do it than when the government "redistributes" it.

      I have also been know to work on roads for free, and as for national defense, I have a gun. If everyone did the same, there'd be little need for government to pretend to do it.

      Yes, I'm an anonymous coward. If you had a gun in the pre-Obama Social Empire would you want your name attached to it?

    63. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Your numbers are a little off:

      'Household income is a measure of current private income commonly used by the United States government and private institutions. To measure the income of a household, the pre-tax money receipts of all residents over the age of 15 over a single year are combined.'

      He said the median working family income. Which would be the after tax number and wouldn't include the income of Donald Trump.

      Since almost all of the wealth in this country rests with the top 10% who are not working families by any reasonable measure I think you'll find that both you and the parent are far too high. $26,000 is probably closer but might require excluding individual incomes and only count two working adults to get it that high.

      The average American is making a Wal-Mart level $5-7/hr salary. Let's not forget that large companies no longer allow their employees to work full time so that is 15-30hrs a week. At the high end, that works out to $10,920 a year before tax. Of course they will have to spend that money, and that means a minimum of 6% of whatever isn't taken in income taxes goes to the state Now we are down to $10,265.

    64. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'I believe he's referring to Japan's very low birth rate in the past two decades, leading to a disproportionately old population retiring from the workforce comparing to the number of youth entering it, which in turn results in lower than projected revenue and higher than projected spending on social programs for the elderly.'

      Which is a bit of a straw man. Japan would have a disproportionate number of elderly and need to bear the expense of caring for them regardless of whether they have a national health care system or not.

    65. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'The elderly population is increasing while birthrate continues to fall. This means that while the number of people dependent on healthcare keeps growing the number of people contributing to the system, via taxes continues to shrink. Simply put, there's too much money coming out of the system and not enough going in.'

      The same problem would exist without socialized medicine. Unless of course you are suggesting that these people could go without care. Without the national system cost of care would be higher to start with, increasing the burden and since only the elderly and their families would have to pay the bills the number of people who share the costs of the care would be even lower than it is with the reduced population.

      Ultimately, the only ones who benefit from privatized medicine are those with high incomes and/or no health problems/elderly to care for. If you make enough, it will cost less to pay your own bills than to pay the taxes and as an added benefit you will encounter shorter wait times because very few people can afford the care.

      I might have supported this if we had an economy in the US akin to what we saw in the 50's. Back then, anyone who was willing to work hard could make enough money to support their family and pay for the basic bills if they managed their money well. That is not true today, couples each working three jobs can barely afford to transportation and household expenses let alone to pay for healthcare, elderly care, or retirement. That is, if they can find that many jobs, even lousy jobs are hard to come by.

      I am a computer technician. 10 years ago I had no trouble finding work. Put out 2 or 3 resumes and bam, job. A few years later no such luck, after about 6 months of living off my reserves I finally gave up looking for a position and went into business for myself. That was fine until last year, since then there hasn't been enough business out there to survive. Since I only needed an income to supplement I applied anywhere and everywhere, restaurants, gas stations, book stores, retail establishments. I remember as a teen I would get this type of job just by going down the street in the commercial district on foot and applying everywhere. Two to three stops later I'd have a job. Today I haven't been able to find even the lowest type of position after 9 months of searching. Today, a student who maintained a 4.0 GPA in college can't get a job at McDonalds.

    66. Re:fp bitches! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I don't see why we'd be unwelcome. There are quite a few of us that don't like him just as much as the rest of the world. Hell some of us are trying to escape.

      Maybe they'd prefer that you stayed there rather than leaving control over what is still (at present and likely for quite a while yet) the world's most influential country to the right-wingers and religious fundamentalists.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    67. Re:fp bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, they've got a robotic suit. I'm picturing armies of elderly gundams. They can take what they want - who's going to stop them?

      An all new season of Matlock.

    68. Re:fp bitches! by Vexor · · Score: 1

      EMP, giant can opener, rust...we have options.

      --
      ~Vexed and loving it!
    69. Re:fp bitches! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      an invention that may have far-reaching benefits for the disabled and elderly'
      Not for $2200/month it won't.

      Was that a reply to :

      Dirty mind is a joy forever...
      I misread it as "$2,200/month Robotic Slut Overlords."

      ?

      $2200/month translates to £1260/month. For a 150-hour working month, that's £8.38/hour. Minimum wage is just recently changed from £5.56/hour to £5.76/hour (I think, approximately), which makes it a not incredible wage for a home-care assistant. If my step daughter wasn't out at her weekend job, I'd ask her what she's getting waiting tables in a café. I think it's about the same.
      Looking at the economics of it, if such a product can reduce the number of days that an otherwise incapable elderly person needs human help, or it can extend a elder's period living in their own home, then it's probably pushing at an economic purchase already. Obviously you have to look closely at each individual set of circumstances.
      If the powered suit can reduce the risk of bad falls and broken hips (I haven't RTFA), then that moves the economic argument considerably in it's favour.

      Actually, I may go and RTFA, then send it to Dad. He's a bit of a gadget freak, but he won't need it for years. Mum isn't likely to take to it, being pretty gadget-phobe (she's never made a call on her mobile, though after 4 years of effort we've got her to carry it and answer it. No, she doesn't drive, though she does have a license.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    70. Re:fp bitches! by Splab · · Score: 1

      Because you guys let him stay in power, one screw up we would be able to handle, but letting him getting into office again - with the absurd rulings and no revolution going down has left the rest of us wondering if the US population should be the only ones having a say in who rules your (once) great country.

    71. Re:fp bitches! by Splab · · Score: 1

      Why don't you guys go and explain that to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan?

      I seem to recall you guys went on a crusade all because of one (or two) men.

    72. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      '£8.38'

      That is $14.15. The average Joe here makes less than half that. That wage would be excellent for a book keeper or average for a computer technician.

      'No, she doesn't drive, though she does have a license.'

      That is a scary thought. You can't manage to get the licenses out of the hands of the elderly and dangerous where you are either? My mother-in-law is 87 and we finally managed get rid of her license after she crashed (at about 15mph) into the median between toll booths.

      There really should be a driven requirement every couple years for anyone over 65. Discrimination be damned, your reflexes and reaction times diminish with age.

    73. Re:fp bitches! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      'No, she doesn't drive, though she does have a license.'
      That is a scary thought. You can't manage to get the licenses out of the hands of the elderly and dangerous where you are either?

      Well, we had to push her really hard to get a provisional license, take lessons, and eventually pass her test in her late 40's, but it was almost impossible to get her to drive. Then when her diabetes was diagnosed she lept on it like a drowning man on a straw and turned her licence in to the authorities. For reasons that aren't too clear, once her diabetes was stabilised and well-controlled, the license was sent back (some mix up at the doctors - someone thought that she wanted her driving license back) so she's now legally permitted to drive, and I'd expect she's perfectly capable. But still she refuses to drive. Maybe we should use a cattle prod to force her?

      There really should be a driven requirement every couple years for anyone over 65. Discrimination be damned, your reflexes and reaction times diminish with age.

      Oh definitely - I've long supported the requirement for people in their declining years to lose their licenses and re-sit their driving tests every [debatable number] years. In fact ... yes, it's still on the government's website at http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/driving-retests/#detail along with a lot of other petitions suggesting a 10-year duration for a driving license.

      Oh - by the way, what age does this decline in reflexes, reaction times etc set in?
      Looking at the ages of successful athletes, probably in the early 20s. So that would mean there simply isn't a question of discrimination - if you're old enough to drive a vehicle of any sort, then you're already at the peak or on the downward slope of your physical prowess, and so you must continually prove your competence.
      Oh, you intended to say "everyone BUT ME is a dangerous driver, and needs to be re-tested regularly" ? I think you need to check the meaning of the word "hubris". Unless you're actually Lewis Hamilton's love child out of Michael Schumacher's sister (who herself is the unacknowledged offspring of Snr. Fangio).

      That is $14.15. The average Joe here makes less than half that. That wage would be excellent for a book keeper or average for a computer technician.

      Now that IS scary. It must be terrible living under the grinding boot of undiluted capitalism. Well, it must have been terrible ; with the nationalisation of the banking system etc, you're on a path to more socially acceptable living standards for the masses. You might even start to get medical treatment for the majority of your population some day.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    74. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'Well, we had to push her really hard to get a provisional license, take lessons, and eventually pass her test in her late 40's, but it was almost impossible to get her to drive.'

      Apparently we live in entirely different worlds. It is not possible for someone of any age to function independently in the United States without driving outside a few metropolitan exceptions. Things are simply too far apart.

      That is the reason the elderly here fight so strongly to retain their drivers license despite the fact that they are dangerous to themselves and others. For them, its about their freedom and independence. Without that drivers license they are forced to use special pay per use shuttles (if they qualify) or ask friends and/or relatives to drive them everywhere they wish to go. Even if there is public transportation of some sort available where they are, the elderly can't typically walk the several miles between the destinations and the stops.

      My choice of age 65 was not arbitrary. 65 is the typical retirement age here in the United States. Mostly, people retire at 65 because their bodies don't function well enough to work anymore at this age. I've never seen someone who was mentally or physically impaired below the age of 65 who couldn't manage to physically operate a motor vehicle. By age 70 that level of physical and mental capacity is the exception rather than the rule.

      'Oh, you intended to say "everyone BUT ME is a dangerous driver, and needs to be re-tested regularly" ?'

      No I said, everyone who is of an age where their age is likely to have impaired their driving ability should be tested regularly. In the same token everyone in a motor vehicle accident should be retested regardless of age. But regardless of how you want to paint the picture there comes an age where age itself is a likely cause of impairment.

      'Looking at the ages of successful athletes, probably in the early 20s.'

      I'm fairly sure there is a performance level gap between achieving optimum speed in running a marathon and being able to push a peddle.

      I do on the other hand feel that driving tests should include reaction and hearing tests the first time you take them as well instead of merely checking vision.

    75. Re:fp bitches! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Apparently we live in entirely different worlds. It is not possible for someone of any age to function independently in the United States without driving outside a few metropolitan exceptions. Things are simply too far apart.

      So, all those historical references I've seen to people living in the Americas in the times of the "Civil War", in the terrorist actions of the Revolutionary War, at the first Thanksgiving meal, and the whole Aztec, Indian and Clovis civilisations ; all of them were allegorical references to populations that could not exist in this continent which was only settled once Henry Ford got his plant going?
      Come to think of it, that would also imply that losing your driving license for drunk driving is actually a death penalty. Wow, how do your government manage to hide the figures on that?

      One day, quite soon, within our lifetimes, hydrocarbon reserves are going to be economically exhausted, and the era of individual personal transportation machines for the masses is going to be ended. The state of electric-powered and/ or hydrogen-powered drive systems looks unlikely to achieve the necessary cost/ performance ratios so that the masses won't be economically available to drive everywhere. At which point, the "public transport" systems will have to expand.
      Live with it.

      For them, its about their freedom and independence.

      That's a problem that you're going to have to deal with.

      Even if there is public transportation of some sort available where they are, the elderly can't typically walk the several miles between the destinations and the stops.

      That's another problem that you're going to have to deal with.

      I've never seen someone who was mentally or physically impaired below the age of 65 who couldn't manage to physically operate a motor vehicle.

      I don't think that you actually mentioned 65 as an age limit, but whatever. I take it that you live in an area of America where the blind and the congenitally retarded, the "legless, the armless, the blind and insane" (to quote a song about the returning war heroes of Gallipoli), are all carefully caged up, out of the sight, mind and consideration of the "Real People".
      Now, I'd never intended to return to America, but I'd appreciate knowing approximately which area that is, so I can avoid it.

      No I said, everyone who is of an age where their age is likely to have impaired their driving ability should be tested regularly.

      I don't think anyone seriously disagrees with the general statement ; the disagreement is about the appropriate age for testing to start. I'd say that it's the age at which people become eligible to drive ; you'd say 65 ; someone, somewhere would probably argue that 150 is an appropriate age, and that dangerous drivers should be removed from the road by the bonnet-mounted bazookas fitted compulsorily to all vehicles with motors. But this detail is quite important.

      In the same token everyone in a motor vehicle accident should be retested regardless of age.

      I'm pretty sure that I covered this point in my proposition to the UK government. Actually, a month's driving ban while the tests are pending would be a pretty good idea too - after all, both (all) drivers involved have demonstrated an inability to avoid an accident, so it's reasonable to suspend both of their licenses. This, I take it, applies to all accidents, and particularly when one of the vehicles is stationary (my only new car ever had it's front end smashed up the first time I took it to the petrol station - the blind idiot pulled-up at the pump in front of me reversed without looking, straight into my car while I was standing beside it trying to figure out how to get the filler-cap off).

      But regardless of how you want to paint the picture there comes an age where ag

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    76. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'So, all those historical references I've seen to people living in the Americas in the times of the "Civil War", in the terrorist actions of the Revolutionary War, at the first Thanksgiving meal, and the whole Aztec, Indian and Clovis civilisations ; all of them were allegorical references to populations that could not exist in this continent which was only settled once Henry Ford got his plant going?
      Come to think of it, that would also imply that losing your driving license for drunk driving is actually a death penalty. Wow, how do your government manage to hide the figures on that?'

      Do you actually expect an answer to any of that?

      'One day, quite soon, within our lifetimes, hydrocarbon reserves are going to be economically exhausted, and the era of individual personal transportation machines for the masses is going to be ended.'

      Hydrocarbon reserves will be exhausted but personal transport will not be. Not in the United States. It would be more feasible to reverse to ride on horseback than to live without personal transport.

      Unlike Europe were almost the entire population is grouped together in the cities, in most of the U.S. things are spaced out. It is perhaps 20 miles to the nearest store and maybe 5 or 10 to your neighbor. Of course the bank in turn is 5 miles from the store. Etc.

      'I don't think that you actually mentioned 65 as an age limit, but whatever. I take it that you live in an area of America where the blind and the congenitally retarded, the "legless, the armless, the blind and insane" (to quote a song about the returning war heroes of Gallipoli), are all carefully caged up, out of the sight, mind and consideration of the "Real People".'

      Actually I did mention 65, again because that is the standard retirement age. People over 65 generally do not need to drive back and forth to work every day.

      I fail to see the relevance of caging the handicapped to the discussion at hand. If you are handicapped and can't drive with assistance you wouldn't have passed your test in the first place. If you become handicapped in some fashion later then it will likely show when you go to renew your license at the normal intervals (5yrs in most states). The blind in particular will have a tough time passing the vision test.

      Those who are handicapped and can't drive, or who have had their drivers licenses revoked are dependent on others to get from place to place. I've known a few people who have had their licenses revoked for drunk driving and life is very hard for them. They have to live in close proximity to a store and rely on friends for transport to and from work each day.

      'There is a LOT more to driving a car than pushing a "pedal".'

      Not physically there isn't and we are talking about decreased physical capacity to operate the vehicle.

      'Which is why my wife, coming to Britain with a full driving license and a few thousand miles of driving under it, is absolutely petrified of driving in this country.'

      That sounds like simple inexperience. I am 27 years old and started driving late (18 rather than 15 like most Americans). Compared to most I don't do a lot of driving but I have over 500,000 miles of driving experience based on my personal vehicle odometers. I don't really take long trips, so pretty much all of that is in town driving. And of course, as an on-site computer technician I drive all day long in a work vehicle and I'm not counting that.

      'Three quick questions for you : do you have a full car license, or are you restricted to automatic-transmission vehicles (I think the American idiom is "non-stick shift")? How do you feel when you're driving an American-design car "on the other side of the road", when you visit your neighbouring countries? which do you find easier to navigate - 5-way traffic light systems (and larger) or the corresponding 5+entry roundabouts?'

      I have an unrestricted license. Even my vision restriction has been removed now because I had Lasik surgery to fix my eyes.

      I have never been outside the United

    77. Re:fp bitches! by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that the sort of people who make use of "mobility scooters" are the sort of people who are infirm in their old age because of not looking after their health through their life. They're frequently obese, I regularly see them smoking, and both those demographics rarely exercise, either. A mobility aid for somebody like Prof Hawking is wonderful. For "Old Mrs Fysh" down the road, it more likely imprisons her in her ill health.

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
    78. Re:fp bitches! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Something went wrong when I was trying to reply to this earlier. Hopefully I've got my reply on the clipboard. :

      Do you actually expect an answer to any of that?

      Not really. But you did imply that it's impossible to live without a car, which is patently false. You might not like to do it, but it wouldn't kill you.

      'One day, quite soon, within our lifetimes, hydrocarbon reserves are going to be economically exhausted, and the era of individual personal transportation machines for the masses is going to be ended.'
      Hydrocarbon reserves will be exhausted but personal transport will not be. Not in the United States. It would be more feasible to reverse to ride on horseback than to live without personal transport.

      Horses are personal transport. And if they turn out to be more fuel efficient than cars (a long calculation- don't forget to add in all the hidden costs.), then horses will again be the preferred method of personal transport. Of course, the meaning of "near to" will change appropriately. When rail was the only mechanised form of transport, the first hour or two of your trip would be done on the back of a horse, and often the last hour as well. In between would be hours or days on a train. Or, in a decade or less, you'd send your "presence" through CCTV and audio to the other location at nearly the speed of light. And visiting Granny would be a once-in-a-lifetime experience for both of you, unless you remain living near to where you were born.

      Unlike Europe were almost the entire population is grouped together in the cities, in most of the U.S. things are spaced out. It is perhaps 20 miles to the nearest store and maybe 5 or 10 to your neighbor. Of course the bank in turn is 5 miles from the store. Etc.

      This will change as the cost of transport rises. For me, if I had a car, it'd take me about 10 minute to drive into the town centre, then I'd have to spend 20 to 30 minutes finding a parking space, which would cost me between £2 and £3 an hour. By comparison, a day-ticket on the bus is £3 and parking is Someone Else's Problem. I may have to wait up to 10 minutes for a bus, then I can read or do the crossword for 20 minutes while the bus takes me where I want to go. Then I get off the bus and walk for a couple of minutes to my final destination. I use the same day-ticket for any other bus journeys that day. It's a no-brain decision really.
      (By the way, compared to Continental cities, the public transport in the UK is atrocious.)

      'I don't think that you actually mentioned 65 as an age limit, but whatever. I take it that you live in an area of America where the blind and the congenitally retarded, the "legless, the armless, the blind and insane" (to quote a song about the returning war heroes of Gallipoli), are all carefully caged up, out of the sight, mind and consideration of the "Real People".'
      Actually I did mention 65, again because that is the standard retirement age. People over 65 generally do not need to drive back and forth to work every day.

      Looking around the town each morning, I see about 1/3 of the people on the move being on the bus. A relatively small number of staff who are needed on-site (several different sites, perhaps) in a hurry have a real need to have a car - your computer technicianship would be an appropriate example. But for most people it's a nice-to-have, not a necessity.
      IF my #3 plan for the next several years career works out, I'll have to get a car, in order to get to the office within 20 minutes of receiving the "OhShit OhShit OhShit OhShit ThisTime We're Really Gonna Die" phone call. Be that call at 15:00 or 03:00. But the idea that having a car guarantees getting there fast only works during the night ; during the day there is zero chance of getting across town in less than an hour. That's with or without bonnet-mounted bazookas.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    79. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'Ah, I deduce that you don't drive on a full license ; you only have an automatic licence. '

      No, shifting just isn't anymore physically demanding than pushing the pedal. I am talking about decreased physical capacity because trying to make the elderly retake their tests due to reduced mental capacity would incite the unrestrained fury of the gray panthers. They are a political organization that represents seniors.

      'New England. The roundabout (what did Jim call it - a "rotary"?) might give you a better clue. I went up the original monadnock (it's a geological term, named after a New England mountain), and did some hill-walking in the White Mountains and a little tourism in Boston. Getting between my friend's house and anywhere started with a 5 minute walk to the station, then train into Boston, then the mass-transit system (whose name I've forgotten).'

      That explains a great deal. That is the most densely populated portion of the United States, along with somewhere between a half dozen and a dozen cities with populations of 150K plus (the largest of which are along the coastlines) that is all of the heavily populated area of the United States. From what I had heard of the UK, almost the entire United States, along with about 2/3rd's of its population lives in areas you'd call 'the country'.

      'As controllers of a ton or so of machinery moving at speed amongst unpredictable civilians, I see no reason for car drivers to be allowed slacker standards of proof-of-competence. I don't think it's important that there are more car drivers than there are aircraft drivers, they still need to prove that they retain their competence.'

      There are no shortage of people operating over a ton of heavy machinery who require no licensing at all or who never have to retest.

      A car has the potential to kill someone at high speeds. An aircraft has the potential to kill thousands, as demonstrated in 9/11. Lets not pretend we are talking about something comparable here.

      Additionally, there is limited need to fly an aircraft. There is daily individual need to drive a car in the United States. In countries like yours it sounds like people drive less and inexperience is the norm.

      We have traffic like you speak of in the large cities and driving in that traffic is stressful. Being able to drive in that traffic has nothing to do with capacity and everything to do with experience. Unfortunately, you can't restrict driving in heavy traffic to the experienced because only heavy traffic experience counts. Yes we have multi-lane roads but we have lane changes in the same manner to which you are referring.

      Honestly, with the driving scenerio you explained I would be deathly afraid to drive on UK roads myself. Drivers are bad enough without people who don't have an hour or more daily experience behind the wheel on the roads!

      'Well, you've only had a century or so of making these accommodations ; most of the rest of the world has had millennia of road plans and conflicting land ownership to deal with.
      Taking out that "design cruft" would cost trillions of any currency, and employ legions of lawyers for generations to sort out the land ownership problems.'

      Sounds like a relatively minor issue compared to restructuring all of the United States as you propose. Every parcel of land is owned. While the government can always take the land and pay what it deems 'fair' for it without the owner's consent that won't make anyone very popular.

      'I do agree that, for the limited case of orthogonal 4-way junctions, traffic lights are better than roundabouts. But for the more common (and more difficult) cases of non-orthogonal junctions, roundabouts are a more generally workable solution.'

      *shudders*

      'How come you've never travelled? You sound like a well-educated, intelligent guy. You're what - 28? By that age, I'd lived in three countries (Holland, Scotland and England), travelled to 4 countries for pleasure and another 4 or so (I forget exactly) for work.'

      I have traveled. I've jus

    80. Re:fp bitches! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      No, shifting just isn't anymore physically demanding than pushing the pedal. I am talking about decreased physical capacity because trying to make the elderly retake their tests due to reduced mental capacity would incite the unrestrained fury of the gray panthers. They are a political organization that represents seniors.

      What on earth has it got to do with being elderly or not? I'm not talking about regularly re-testing the elderly drivers. I'm talking about regularly re-testing EVERYONE with a driving license. No discrimination, no argument, a fixed duration for everyone's license.

      Spending an hour a day in a car sounds a pretty hellish way to spend your life. OK, if you're a taxi driver or something, or if you actually enjoy driving. But for me, I'd rather do something interesting.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    81. Re:fp bitches! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'What on earth has it got to do with being elderly or not? I'm not talking about regularly re-testing the elderly drivers. I'm talking about regularly re-testing EVERYONE with a driving license. No discrimination, no argument, a fixed duration for everyone's license.'

      But I'm talking about the elderly. By and large they are extremely dangerous and shouldn't be on the roads.

      'Spending an hour a day in a car sounds a pretty hellish way to spend your life.'

      It seems like a pretty fair trade-off for not being cramped together like sardines in a can.

  3. Bzzt. Movie reference overload by Kjella · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cyberdyne, a new company in Tsukuba outside Tokyo, will mass-produce HAL.

    Cyberdyne? Will produce HAL? Outlook not so good.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Bzzt. Movie reference overload by Elldallan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder how long it takes for them to announce their new cloud computing interface conveniently named Skynet
      or perhaps their Cylon line of robotic factory workers.

    2. Re:Bzzt. Movie reference overload by hellop2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Outlook not so good."

      Hey, what's with all the Microsoft bashing?

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    3. Re:Bzzt. Movie reference overload by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      They're just called it that (and named their company that) for the free publicity it will bring.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    4. Re:Bzzt. Movie reference overload by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't start the development of Skynet, I think we're safe.

    5. Re:Bzzt. Movie reference overload by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      Obviously, but it's still an awesome name lol.

    6. Re:Bzzt. Movie reference overload by g0es · · Score: 1

      The minute i saw HAL i thought of HAL 9000 and thought, that's unfortunate. $2,200 a month is steep, but my guess the price will come down, and add government assistance it might be with in the range of some.

    7. Re:Bzzt. Movie reference overload by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I gotta pee. Open the zipper, HAL.
      I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Bzzt. Movie reference overload by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Cyberdyne, a new company in Tsukuba outside Tokyo, will mass-produce HAL.

      Cyberdyne? Will produce HAL? Outlook not so good.

      Ask about Exchange Server next!

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  4. What about ./ers by kamikazearun · · Score: 2, Funny

    and _their_ "mobility problems"?

    1. Re:What about ./ers by Kjella · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about ./ers and _their_ "mobility problems"?

      Just a myth. We just don't want to leave the basement.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:What about ./ers by kamikazearun · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about ./ers and _their_ "mobility problems"?

      Just a myth. We just don't want to leave the basement.

      Clever. Clever. I notice how you say "the basement" suggesting there's a chance that said basement might actually belong to you.

    3. Re:What about ./ers by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      We are waiting for the T-X model to come out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-X

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    4. Re:What about ./ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the brain signals of the average /.er a robotic limb would be overkill and probably rather unhygenic.

    5. Re:What about ./ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the manufacturer actually IS a company named Cyberdyne...

  5. Cyberdyne? by ameline · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone remember what happened the last time we let Cyberdyne make anything remotely robotic? :-)

    --
    Ian Ameline
    1. Re:Cyberdyne? by Exanon · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new elderly robotic overlords.

    2. Re:Cyberdyne? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Summer Glau, is that you?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Cyberdyne? by thermian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Summer Glau, is that you?

      If all robots looked like her, I'd be the first in the queue for robotic domination...

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    4. Re:Cyberdyne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new elderly robotic overlords.

      I can totally see a Simpsons or South Park episode coming out of this

    5. Re:Cyberdyne? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember what happened the NEXT we let Cyberdyne make anything remotely robotic? :-)

      There. Fixed that for ou.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    6. Re:Cyberdyne? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember what happened the NEXT TIME we let Cyberdyne make anything remotely robotic? :-)

      There. Fixed that for You.

      There. Fixed that for me.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    7. Re:Cyberdyne? by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Will anyone remembered what happened the last time we will allowed Cyberdyne to make anything remotely robotic?

      There, fixed that for you. Geez, won't they taught time-travel grammar anybefore?

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    8. Re:Cyberdyne? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Sure. We got this. See why some of us prefer anime?

  6. It's only a matter of time... by dexmachina · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Why's this damn thing taking me to the ledge. Stop! Hey! Stop it!" "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that..."

  7. Varitechs for the elderly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds pretty cool at first, but I'm not sure I like the idea of the elderly zipping around on Cyclones. Please don't equip them with the missile racks or cloaking devices.

  8. Sounds cool by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Funny

    What weapon systems come with it? I didn't see any listed, but I'd have to assume it at least has flamethrowers or some sort of rockets.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Sounds cool by RuBLed · · Score: 0, Troll

      Mettalic Tentacles.

    2. Re:Sounds cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a troll? seems like a spelling nazi got mod points.

    3. Re:Sounds cool by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... or it's a dyslexic prude who thought it meant iron balls.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Sounds cool by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      two shoulder mounted plasma guns, a rocket pod on the left shoulder, 50cal machine guns in the right wrist.

      problem is there are no JATOL rockets in the back for flying over buildings.

      I just want one to cover in green latex and run around town screaming "HULK SMASH! small blonde in bug SUV driving like idiot anger hulk!"

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Sounds cool by ebh · · Score: 1

      Phased plasma rifle in the 40W range.

    6. Re:Sounds cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For something out of Japan, I'm disappointed it wasn't twenty stories tall and able to trample over entire cities. Now who wouldn't want to have a go at renting a mecha to battle Godzilla or some other monster-sized nemesis?

    7. Re:Sounds cool by BForrester · · Score: 1

      I'd have to assume it at least has flamethrowers

      A pilot light remains lit in the rear torso section.
      It is up to the elderly client to provide combustible gaseous fuel.
      This is not likely to be a problem.

    8. Re:Sounds cool by A440Hz · · Score: 1

      Dr. Evil: You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have grannies with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Now evidently my cycloptic colleague informs me that that cannot be done. Ah, would you remind me what I pay you people for, honestly? Throw me a bone here! What do we have?

      Number Two: Middle aged men who drive Miatas.

      Dr. Evil: [pause] Right.

      Number Two: They're mutated middle-aged men.

      Dr. Evil: Are they ill tempered?

      Number Two: Absolutely.

      Dr. Evil: Oh well, that's a start.

  9. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 1

    I think the article missed the feature where the wearer powers up, screaming while an animated background appears.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:Hrmm by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what I think is interesting is that the country that brought you the fantasy ... is bringing you the reality as an encore.

      Japan is, famously, a conformist society, yet somehow creativity seems to burst out in wild flights of technological fantasy.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  10. insurance, I'm going t0 need it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can I get insuraNCE on this thing. I'm going to need it.

  11. Lies by Onaga · · Score: 4, Informative

    It isn't really reading brain signals. From the own company's website, they say the system detects signals on the surface of the skin (of what is intended to be moved). That is why they demonstrate it with partially paralyzed people. If the spinal column cannot relay any signal at all to the legs, then the system cannot work.

    1. Re:Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would assume you could use other muscle information to control it as well. Just with leg muscles you have a well mapped standard making control easier and faster to learn. With other muscles you would have to learn to walk all over again.

    2. Re:Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerve activity is detected by measuring potential differences on the surface of the skin and using Poisson's equation to extrapolate the activity of the nerve it originates from. The nerve itself is formed of axons which are the tail part of a neuron located in the brain or spinal cord.
      So yes, it is reading 'brain signals', even though the detector isn't on the scalp.

  12. Now available !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iron Man Mark I now available to the general public.

  13. Mod Points by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    God, if only I had them! I rofl'd.

  14. Pictures by F�an�ro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not to mention it will make you look like TRON:
    http://www.cyberdyne.jp/english/robotsuithal/index.html

    What's not to like?

  15. Hack by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

    So can these things be hacked, say to increase the response speed by a factor of 10? It would either kill your granny in the most hilarious way or else it would make her into a superhero. Either way a great video on youtube.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    1. Re:Hack by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Didn't "Waldo and Grommit" do a film about that?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  16. but does it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come in a pink Yumiko Shaku edition?

  17. great to see this invention! by paniq · · Score: 1

    so that means when i'm old, i get to have one of these probotector suits? after all i'm close to death then, with nothing to lose. that will be so much fun stomping brats and pesky dogs.

    seriously, i would make sure these suits can't do much damage. when i was a kid, an old guy punched me in the stomach while i passed him running in the train. guess how that might have turned out if he had one of these battlemechs.

    --
    Do not trust this signature.
  18. My God by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    Bad memories of Exo Man are flooding into my brain...

  19. Welcome to the early edition of BLACK FRIDAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell
    Sell
    Sell
    or you will
    DIE
    DIE
    DIE
    depending on how high the window was you jumped from

  20. Startup commands. by GrpA · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hear that the first beta testers are annoyed that to bootstrap the suit, they have to stand in a spread-eagle configuration and yell out "Power Extreme!"

    GrpA

    --
    Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
  21. obligatory! (sorry, I could not help it) by apodyopsis · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Stop them Gromit! They're the wrong trousers and they've gone all wrong!"

    My favorite mechanical trouser mayhem.

    From one of my favorite short films ever!

    Though I have no idea how well known it is out of the UK.

    Now if only I could find my copy of 'Electronics for Dogs'.

    1. Re:obligatory! (sorry, I could not help it) by ebh · · Score: 1

      Aardman not known in the States? Are you kidding?

      Fresh MEAT!

  22. It's in the tags, but not the comments by initialE · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  23. Evil overlords prevail! by fi1th · · Score: 0

    All your elderly are belong to me! (N.B read 'me' as 'Japanese company')

  24. Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost... by patio11 · · Score: 1

    ... in 1985? Those were a big boon to old people, too -- have an emergency while out or alone, take out your Brick-sized Rescue Device Which Cost $1,000 and call for assistance. Now a cellphone for old folks costs essentially nothing, weighs essentially nothing, and the #1 problem is that its too hard to use so you see companies making Credit Card Sized Rescue Device With Single Button That Immediately Summons Ambulance To Your Door Which Costs $20.

    Give it a few more years of iterative improvement, something the Japanese tech industry excels at. They won't rest until Nintendo can bundle these with their systems, charge $200, make 25% margins, and get ridiculed by Sony, Microsoft, and Apple for being gimmicky and technically inferior to their iPlayBox.

  25. That's all well and good, but.... by Temtongkek · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..until I have a lightweight, flexible, ultra-thin suit capable of delivering awesomeness, babe-magnetic badassery and courage enough to socialize, like this, I'm simply not interested.

  26. Christ on a crutch.. SMOKING SAVES MONEY by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    how many chain smoking senior citizens are around?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  27. Whatever happened by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    to people taking care of their parents and grand parents?

    When did it become accepted to just dump them on the corner for other people to pay for?

    Sorry, your statement reeks of political correctness, holier-than-thou, good speak. In other words, total bs.

    The simple fact is that a hundred years ago, if not less in many areas, we took care of our relatives ourselves. Our churches and communities would organize events to do so. I fully expect one of my parents to be living with us after they lose their spouse. It just is what is supposed to happen.

    Instead we now pretend it doesn't cost anything if the government takes care of them, blissfully ignoring that 30% loss of income we experience every pay day.

    Government doesn't do anything that taxpayers don't pay for.

    The truth is that we live in a society where guilting others into doing things you cannot afford to or won't do is the accepted means. For the children, for the elderly, for the animals, for the environment, well, damn, why not live up to the high standards you want forced on others.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Whatever happened by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Informative

      When did it become accepted to just dump them on the corner for other people to pay for?

      Probably around the same time that two incomes became necessary to support a family.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Whatever happened by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      When did it become accepted to just dump them on the corner for other people to pay for?

      Probably around the same time that two incomes became necessary to support a family.

      Well, that's most certainly an issue but I think it goes back further than that. Up until modern transportation systems were developed, people by and large lived and died not very far from where they were born. You knew ALL your relatives, saw them every day, and you knew you could count on their support to take care of family members who could no longer care for themselves.

      However, once it became easy to simply pick up and move across the country and settle in another state, that basic family cohesiveness disappeared. It's very hard to maintain a significant emotional connection with a relative that's a couple of thousand miles away. We're human beings, we need proximity. And even then, what do you do when you've made a life somewhere else, and you are called upon to help? You probably owe it to that person to dig in and do what's right ... but it's really easy to rationalize doing nothing, or very little, because it would be too inconvenient. "I have responsibilities here, I can't just leave them hanging. Sorry." Whether or not you like your parents is irrelevant: if they raised you, you owe them. Oh sure, there are exceptions, such as parents that abused their children. But in far too many cases, we as a people shirk our responsibility to the previous generation.

      We've become a downright emotionally cold culture since we began dismantling the family unit. Sure, we have families, but the kids grow up, move out and away, and when the parents get old it's expected that the State will care for them. Or, if there's sufficient money in the equation then a private nursing home: either way, if you know anything about such facilities they're usually hellholes. Anyone who willingly stuffs a member of their family in one of those places should be kneecapped.

      I've been through all of this: my father was very ill for several years before he died, and I gave up my consulting business and my fiancee to take care of him. I had promised him I'd never put him in a nursing home, and kept that promise. It wasn't easy, and honestly I'm not sure if I could do it again, but it was the right thing to do. Most of the rest of the family was uninterested in helping out, so I was forced to go it alone. Now that I know where I stand with them, I'm building another life somewhere else, with a family that does care. Life's too short, really, it is.

      Harry Chapin said it best: you see, the new job's a hassle and the kids have the flu ... but it's sure nice talkin' to you, Dad, sure nice talkin' to you. That's what family means to a lot of us nowadays, and that's too bad.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Whatever happened by shaitand · · Score: 1

      A few years is one thing, but these people are living senile and miserable (they are rarely happy with anything) for 10-20yrs. I don't know many loving parents who wish for their kids to throw away 25% of their own life to care for them.

    4. Re:Whatever happened by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      A few years is one thing, but these people are living senile and miserable (they are rarely happy with anything) for 10-20yrs. I don't know many loving parents who wish for their kids to throw away 25% of their own life to care for them.

      Yes, but that wasn't what I said. I went through it by myself as a result of the way things are now. In the past, when you had an entire extended family around, it was possible to keep that old one around for a long time without destroying anyone's life.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  28. America by Friendly+Pyro · · Score: 1

    America just learned how to make a near successful robot arm and Japan's got a full suit?

    1. Re:America by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

      America just learned how to make a near successful robot arm and Japan's got a full suit?

      Well they built one exoskeleton, but just before it was ready to test some huge German guy wearing a leather jacket and sun glasses broke in and destroyed the lab.

  29. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by TheLink · · Score: 1

    A cellphone is not only hard for some old folks to use, it's also hard to use if you have something like a stroke and can no longer figure out numbers or have lost language ability, or are otherwise severely incapacitated.

    --
  30. flamebait? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1, Funny

    Modders, please remod the parent to something sensible. It's a perfectly valid argument.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  31. Where have we seen this before? by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that nobody has yet mentioned Roujin Z. Written by the same guy from Akira fame, its basically a very advanced hospital bed run amok.

    Hint: The internal logic is really a weapons platform!

    I, for one, welcome our new robotic geriatric overlords!

    --
    { - Generic Guy - }
  32. Re:Christ on a crutch.. SMOKING SAVES MONEY by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

    how many chain smoking senior citizens are around?

    Fewer every day.

  33. Japanese robotic suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it come with cat ears and some tentacles?

  34. Elderly 209 by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 4, Funny

    [ED 209] You have twenty seconds to get off my lawn. [/ED 209]

    1. Re:Elderly 209 by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      [Me] But..I'm off your lawn! I'm standing in the street!

      [ED 209] You have ten seconds to comply.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  35. Damn! by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    I want to be japanese when I grow up!

  36. One Step Closer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing I notice is how close in size the HAL is to leg bones. And it already reads brain signals? We're one step closer to having bionic limbs, excellent.

  37. Big Suit? by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    Oh wow! David Byrne is going to love this!

    --
    -
  38. Obligatory response: by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

    Heh, just what you see, pal.

  39. DEAR GOD NO by loafula · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone who has ever seen the elderly try to drive a car already knows this is a HORRIBLE idea.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    1. Re:DEAR GOD NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shins everywhere cower in fear.

    2. Re:DEAR GOD NO by indytx · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has ever seen the elderly try to drive a car already knows this is a HORRIBLE idea.

      Puhh-lease. My grandmother only drives at about 30 MPH. Of course, she drives at that same 30 MPH through parking lots. And on my driveway. Pretty much 30 MPH at all times, really. Hmmmm. Maybe you're right.

      --
      Make love, not reality television.
  40. A misreading. by Catmeat · · Score: 1

    Robotic Suit For Rent In Japan Why did I first read this as referring to a legal case? Possibly involving a Japanese landlord taking a robot tenant to court over unpaid rent.

  41. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by Shotgun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that they will be running up against the Laws of Physics. You can make it smaller and lighter all you want, as long as you don't run up against those most enforced of laws.

    Phones and video games just have to produce voltages large enough to represent 1s and possibly 0s. Maybe produce some light. You can get away with using less power if you can make the electronics smaller. A nice feedback loop.

    This robotic system has to actually lift and move things. Things that are not getting smaller. It takes a given amount of power to lift a 170lb person. You can't make the power requirement smaller. To be mobile, something to generate that power has to be carried along. There are several ways of possibly accomplishing this task, but don't count on any major revolutions.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  42. I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for $2200 a month I would go help some old people move, that's only about twice what I'm making now working tech support....

  43. The suit looks nice and all but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where's the iPod dock?

  44. Halloween Anyone? by RenoGeek · · Score: 0

    I personally would love to walk around with one of these on the day of scary things. Except for one problem... "Hi Kenny!"

    --
    Clones are people two!
  45. Funding my retirement by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    It's a short calendar until I am eligible for AARP membership, then I will get one of these suits, and you young farts will be forced to fund Social Security! BWA HAHAHA HAHAH!

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  46. Korea just announced their version of the suit by CodyRazor · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're calling it the Dragoon

    --
    So Skulldilocks threw acid on the schoolchildrens' faces, cause somebody from the bible told her to do it!
  47. Cyberdyne? HAL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, not only is Cyberdyne creating this, they named it HAL? That's like double screwing humanity over.

  48. Sharing the suit....? by benwiggy · · Score: 1

    You might want to give it a wipe with cloth between users. It can get mighty hot in there.

  49. More like - by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

    A robotic suit that reads brain signals and helps (nerds) with (self defense) problems.

    This suit is now the ultimate power in the universe!

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  50. "currently feeling pain" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you danes shouldn't be so comfortable about your current benefit levels or job surpluses...

    According this, the danish banking crisis is the worst in europe...

    http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/09/danish-banking-crisis-worst-in-europe.html

  51. Wait till the elderly doze off in their robosuit by 101010_or_0x2A · · Score: 1

    and daydream about base-jumping from the tallest building

  52. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    I was reading about this kind of brain-sensing technology in Discover magazine. The next step is to replace the cybernetic limbs with stimulators that will activate the user's own muscles, so the whole thing will be essentially invisible on the outside, and a whole lot lighter. It's a way of getting signals out of the brain and into the muscles while bypassing the damaged spinal cord. Maybe a small amount of electrical power would be needed, but it'd be cool if they could tap into or reproduce the body's natural electrical impulses.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  53. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by CubicleView · · Score: 1

    You can't make the power requirement smaller.

    Yes you can, you just tell granny she has to move slower.
    As an aside, it's understandable but very disappointing how slow progress is with battery tech. I keep reading all these headlines about increased power, but hardly anything about energy density.

  54. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by TheSimkin · · Score: 1

    But you can build robots to build the robots, reducing the cost of production, if not the materials that go into the production.

  55. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by shaitand · · Score: 1

    'To be mobile, something to generate that power has to be carried along.'

    Minor correction:

    To be mobile, something to store that power has to be carried along.

    The power can be generated by existing power infrastructure. The bot just needs to store it. And while generator technology may not be making leaps and bounds rechargeable battery technology has major advances around the corner.

  56. More Obligitory...RoboGramps by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    Elderly crime fighters? Packing Gattling RoboGramps heat that shoots out of their arm?

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  57. Mobile Homes by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    If this suit keeps the rain out, then all it takes is one of them and a gym membership (with showers and lockers) to replace an entire apartment. I'd bet the average Tokyo apartment rents for more than $2200 a month, and even "coffin hotels" probably charge more than $75 a night. Included in the suit's rent is not just protection from the elements, but super strength!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  58. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things that are not getting smaller. It takes a given amount of power to lift a 170lb person. You can't make the power requirement smaller.

    True, but you can make the power supply and moving parts more efficient.

    If you reduce the amount of energy wasted to friction, heat, and so on then you can always have room for improvement.

    Secondly, it doesn't take that much energy to move a 170lb person if you factor in greater efficiency (remember your high school physics class about fulcrums, pulleys, and ramps) with the environment and use secondary motion to capture regenerative energy.

    If you think about it, a human body itself doesn't burn through that much calories just to move itself up a flight of stairs so its quite possible to make something at least as efficient as the human body and not break the laws of physics. Considering the inefficiencies of evolution, I don't think its that far fetched to design a robotic systems that do way better.

  59. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by HiThere · · Score: 1

    That depends an awful lot on just which cell phone you are looking at. There are some models that are fairly large and dead simple. Some of them don't even have ONE pre-programmed memory, and have keys larger than those on my keyboard, which digits that take up the entire key in black and white for sharp contrast.

    No special functions.

    That may be just a little bit too simple. I think the keypad should have 3 or 4 special keys that each dials a preprogrammed number.
    1) Non-urgent assistance/Family (Pink)
    2) Emergency assistance-medical (Red with small white polka-dots).
    3) Fire (white with red flames)
    4) Police (black & white checks)

    The color scheme is basically arbitrary, but it's intended to be easily distinguishable even by color-blind people. The particular choice of four options is also nearly arbitrary. Places that divide the services differently would have a different selection of four preprogrammed choices.

    Note this is still basically just a phone. Nothing fancy. I didn't even include an automatic redial. It's got a standard phone keypad, with four extra function keys. And each key is about 3/8" X 3/8", which allows large easily visible letters.

    But that's just my design. There are simple, easy, phones on the market. There's also phones on the market that are super-glitzed to where most users can use less than half the features, and the elderly can't use at all.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  60. Re:Amen to that -- remember what cell phones cost. by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Yes, but...

    Battery improvement has been slow, but recently there have been many encouraging signs. I'm most impressed by reports of progress in super-capacitors. They don't use any unusual metals to hold the charge, though they do depend on extremely precise manufacturing (which raises the price, at least for now).

    OTOH, I don't expect volume shipments of super-capacitors within the next five years. (But would I know? I only know what the official reports say that the science press finds interesting. It's not something I follow as a specialty.)

    It's not clear that super-capacitors will ever hold more power than an advanced battery, but it looks like they can be recharged more quickly and more often (essentially forever). I'm not sure this is what an electric car needs, but it sounds perfect for a mobile device that will often be near an electric outlet.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.