Slashdot Mirror


"BlueTrack" Mouse More Advanced Than Laser, Optical

ThinSkin writes "Just when you thought laser and optical mice were enjoying their reign on mousepads worldwide, Microsoft has to come along and introduces their 'BlueTrack Technology,' a mouse tracking system that aims to work on virtually any terrain short of mirrored and reflective surfaces. ExtremeTech reviews the Explorer Mouse and Explorer Mini Mouse, both of which are powered by Microsoft's newest sensor, to see just how well this technology works. Testing on granite, carpet, marble, and other surfaces, the reviewers were impressed with the responsiveness of BlueTrack, but they also noted that laser mice were competitive on these surfaces as well. Even though the mice didn't get a recommendation from the reviewers (price being a major concern), they did admit that this BlueTrack is the best tracking system available today. MaximumPC has some pictures and a brief technical interview."

191 comments

  1. Yeah by funehmon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because we all use carpet padded desktops.

    1. Re:Yeah by BeNJ-GoS · · Score: 3, Informative

      most of us don't. but the article does explain where they encounter it and where the need came from...

    2. Re:Yeah by asCii88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but finally I'll be able to play Crysis inside my sand castle!

    3. Re:Yeah by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be honest the parent is probably the target market, i.e. gamers. No-one else spends more than £10 on a mouse because there is no need to, the technology and usability of a £10 mouse is perfect.

      Since anyone buying an expensive mouse probably also buys expensive mouse pads, this thing is doubly pointless.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Yeah by gadabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i bought a razer mouse. not for the blue lights (the only reason i installed the razer driver was to turn the lights off), the gaming gimmick angle, or the razer name, but because it was the only mouse in either of the stores i went to that had the buttons i needed (5) and was actually comfortable in my hand and on my skin. i felt like a chump shelling out 40 bucks for a mouse, but after 2 years with it, i'm VERY glad that i did - especially when i use someone else's computer and their $17 mouse.

      without a comfortable, durable interface, a computer is pretty damn useless, imo.

      --
      the united states is a nation of laws; badly written and randomly enforced -- frank zappa
    5. Re:Yeah by Yst · · Score: 1

      Because we all use carpet padded desktops.

      I'm a librarian (on the web/systems end of library work), and at my library, we do have a patron who frequently comes in to use our wifi, and uses his mouse on a thick, crocheted wool doily. Clearly, this is the mouse for him.

      --
      Karma: Chameleon (comes and goes)
    6. Re:Yeah by evanbd · · Score: 1

      I have a glass desk. Obviously the optical mouse has trouble. I would, however, love to get rid of the mousepad -- it always seems like one more piece of clutter (of which my desk already has enough, thank you). I'm guessing this new tech comes closer, but that there's a ways to go before glass surfaces are within reach.

    7. Re:Yeah by j_sp_r · · Score: 1

      I love the shape of the Logitech MX5xx line, but my old MX510 broke, so had to buy an expensive MX518. I hate small laptop mouses, so this mouse is to carry around and I got a trackball at home.

    8. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or compute in bed. Black sheets help.

    9. Re:Yeah by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I spent £25 ($50) on my current mouse (a Logitech LX8, a wireless laser job) and I don't game with it, nor do I have a mouse pad. Given my previous mouse lasted me over five years and even the fanciest mice are well under £100, they're all pretty cheap for the use you get out of them. I just picked the one that felt good in my hand and had the buttons I wanted. I didn't look for wireless, but I've rapidly grown rather fond of it. £10 or £20 extra is nothing for something you might use for several hours of most days for many years.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    10. Re:Yeah by Malekin · · Score: 1

      To be honest the parent is probably the target market, i.e. gamers.

      TFA mentions that is a wireless mouse, which gamers generally shun for lagginess and weight, and includes the quote "Explorer Mouse and Explorer Mini Mouse perform at 1000 dpi, which we find is the ideal speed for productivity mice."

    11. Re:Yeah by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I have had expensive mice too, but by far the best one has been a cheap Samsung mouse. It just fits my hand better than any other mouse. It's corded and optical, PS2 only which is a bit of a shame but otherwise perfect. I have had it for 10 years this year.

      Comfort is really hard to buy, because it depends on you as much as the product. Keyboards are the same, I use a £10 Pacard Bell one which just happens to be really nice.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Yeah by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Tried a laser mouse?

    13. Re:Yeah by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always been amazed by people willing to spend extra money (and significant amounts of it at that) on just a tad faster processor, GPU and whatnot, but then picking a cheapo monitor, keyboard and mouse.
      Somehow, I'd rather work on a merely decent configuration with excellent peripherals than on a ultra-fast rig with a $5 keyboard and $2 mouse. Whatever I'm doing, my CPU is mostly idling; my hands on my keyboard are not.

      I spent a bunch of money for a Unicomp SpaceSaver keyboard (Model M, for all practical purposes); the shipping and taxes practically doubled the price. I got an MX Revolution from Logitech as a replacement for my defunct MX 1000.
      My computer is a single-core configuration that was excellent in its day and age, but is significantly weaker than my year-and-a-half-old MacBook Pro. I don't know when exactly I'll have to get a new keyboard, but I don't expect it to happen in the next decade. And I know I won't be spending a second of that time wondering whether the pressed key took or not.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    14. Re:Yeah by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      I use the cardboard back off an old letter-size notepad. Larger, but thinner than a mousepad, and consequently more comfortable to use. And if it gets wrecked, I can just pitch it and get another. It's also easily set aside if I need the desk space for something.

    15. Re:Yeah by Fortimir · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I still use my Diamondback over two years later, and wouldn't give it up for any other mouse.

      --
      I live in a place where those who live forever come to die.
    16. Re:Yeah by Confuzzled · · Score: 1

      I also bought a razer (and the mat to go with it), and it's an amazing combination.

      Something I think no one has mentioned is lift-off distance. If the mouse can track well over a carpet, does it also mean that it tracks over large grooves? this would make the lift-off distance very high.

      I hear first gen lasers had big lift offs. My razer's lift-off is pretty short (roughly 5mm), which is ideal for gaming.

      Yeah I spent way too much on it... but it's oh so nice, glides like butter.

    17. Re:Yeah by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Currently, I actually use a piece of typing paper taped down. Large, and I can just use the desk space on top of it without setting aside.

    18. Re:Yeah by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I have a glass desk. Obviously the optical mouse has trouble. I would, however, love to get rid of the mousepad -- it always seems like one more piece of clutter (of which my desk already has enough, thank you).

      Have you tried adhering the mouse pad to the underside of the glass desktop? It might work if the glass isn't too thick for the focus. A sandblasted mouse-pad region might work better, but is more permanent.

      I've also had problems with laser mice on lenticular mouse pads.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    19. Re:Yeah by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Usually I won't set my cardboard aside either. My problem with paper is that it warps too easily from moisture from my hand. The cardboard is heavy enough I don't need to tape it, either.

      I wonder how optical mice would work on etched glass? That could be a rather fashionable (if not entirely practical for all users) approach.

  2. Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...and be done with it.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Last time I checked, accelerometer-based position tracking alone didn't work too well as speeds become offset more and more over time, that is as errors accumulate your cursor would start to move even when the mouse isn't moving. However I guess that coupled with a more traditional tracking to add more precision to quick movements, it could be a great thing!

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you tried using an accelerometer as a pointing device? I played with a £400 device with six-axis accelerometers and it didn't have enough precision to track a movement to the right and then a return to the same starting point as returning to its original position. The only reason the Wii controller is accurate is that it constantly recalibrates itself from the bar under the display. Attach a bowling ball to your mouse, put it on a frictionless surface, and then move it with an elastic band, and you'll get an idea of what an accelerometer-based pointing device built with current technology would feel like.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Jethro · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Attach a bowling ball to your mouse, put it on a frictionless surface,
      > and then move it with an elastic band,

      I'll get right on that.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Attach a bowling ball to your mouse, put it on a frictionless surface, and then move it with an elastic band, and you'll get an idea of what an accelerometer-based pointing device built with current technology would feel like.

      That'd be one heavy mouse indeed.

    5. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by M8e · · Score: 1

      Good luck with the frictionless surface.

    6. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he has plenty of lube to hand.

    7. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by brendank310 · · Score: 5, Funny

      They sell them at Home Depot between the perpetual motion machines, and the objects of mass m.

    8. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by davolfman · · Score: 1

      I once got ahold of an old Sidewinder Freestyle. It didn't take me long to detach it and shove it in a drawer never to be seen again.

    9. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attach a bowling ball to your mouse
      Put it on a frictionless surface
      Move it with an elastic band
      ?????
      Profit!

    10. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Jethro · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's called "Butter" and it's available at any grocery store!

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    11. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by digitalchinky · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, lets diss the puny little accelerometer then and replace it with a triple ring laser gyro. It'll be accurate to a couple of centimetres for every thousand or so kilometres that you push it on the table. For those unhappy about this level of inaccuracy you could also link it in with GPS and perhaps your own personal DGPRS beacon and so forth to keep the pointer where it damn well needs to be. :-)

    12. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      If you think that the Wii uses accelerometers for the pointer function, you are mistaken. It just uses the IR sensor bar as a technology that improves the old style light guns. It is actually not a great improvement though, as it works frustratingly bad on my 120" screen (it feels like it assumes I have a 40-50" TV, so I am still pointing to the middle of the screen when the pointer has already run off the top).

      The same goes for the games that do not have a pointer - the sensor bar is useless for them, no "recalibrating" of any sort for the accelerometers. Try unplugging it for example and there is no effect.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    13. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by biraneto · · Score: 1

      >The only reason the Wii controller is accurate is that it constantly recalibrates itself from the bar under the display.

      Actually no. It uses the bar to track its rotation on its Z axis. Without the bar it can only detect rotation on the Y an X axis. You can test it by connecting it to a pc(you will need bluetooth). http://www.custompc.co.uk/howtos/601059/control-your-pc-with-a-wiimote.html#

    14. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Zadaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might want to study accelerometers more. Despite the runaway success of the Wii and iPhone, they don't cure all ills.

      What you would end up with is something that would both be as accurate as your average pedometer and still so sensitive that your pulse would screw up its tracking.

      Yes, there are ways to mitigate both of those things but they would dramatically increase the price of the thing. And laser mice are really cheap.

    15. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Skowronek · · Score: 1

      Gyros sense rotational velocity, accelerometers linear acceleration. So even a RLG won't tell you too much about linear mouse movements on a flat surface.

      What you really want is to sense linear velocity, but unfortunately you can't really do that without some external frame of reference (like, say, a camera pointing at your table).

    16. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh, etc.

    17. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      frictionless butter? buttering an ear of corn is hard enough with conventional butter.

    18. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like jokes that make sense. If you look hard enough you might actually find those!

    19. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Three radio beacons on/in the desk, that the mouse can triangulate from?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    20. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Skowronek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that might be pretty cool. But then you have to calibrate it.

    21. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      This thing has a nice bright LED, why not point the webcam?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    22. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be too awful of an idea to use an accelerometer to help the optical sensor disambiguate on certain kinds of surfaces.

  3. where is jerry? by eric-x · · Score: 2, Funny

    I expected at least a Seinfeld quote somewhere.

  4. 2.4GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. So it's a fancy new technology to let us use a mouse in a carpeted aquarium at night, but they use a RF band full of cheap cordless phones and microwave ovens???

  5. All the buttons in the world by EdZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll stick with my MX Revolution. I've yet to find a mouse with the same number of buttons arranged in an equally usable manner. And yes, I DO use all of them.

    1. Re:All the buttons in the world by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny

      My pointing device has about 103 buttons in a very convenient layout. It did take a little while to get used to, but some schools even have classes on how to use it effectively. It's great, because with this pointing device, I can also enter new textual information, rather than pointing and grunting at the stuff that's already on the screen.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:All the buttons in the world by fistfullast33l · · Score: 2, Informative

      The MX Revolution is a piece of junk. I absolutely hate it. I have my desktop wired up to my HDTV and use the MX revolution along with the diNovo Edge keyboard. The keyboard, which is bluetooth, works amazingly well. No signal loss, no lag between typing and text appearing on the screen. Even the touchpad works reasonably well, however it has some difficulties determining double clicks but it's not my main mouse so who cares?

      The Revolution, on the other hand, has been nothing but headaches. Mind you, it's not bluetooth. At first I thought I was too far from the PC. Now I sit about 8 feet away at most from the receiver. The mouse constantly stops moving, the system consistently registers single clicks as double clicks, and the driver install is all screwed up on my machine. The mouse has been such a huge waste of money.

      Why can't someone make a decent bluetooth mouse?

    3. Re:All the buttons in the world by Columcille · · Score: 1

      I'm picky about what mouse I will use and MX Revolution is definitely at the top of my list. It's my regular use daily mouse with the MX 5000 as backup. Throw in my DiNovo Edge and my wireless world is happy.

      --
      I love my sig.
    4. Re:All the buttons in the world by jebrew · · Score: 2, Informative
      http://www.gyration.com/

      I've got one of these for my HTPC, stows well with the keyboard in a coffee table drawer for when the computer is not what's on screen. It works very well. I sit about 10' from my TV (under which the dongle sits) and it's fairly infrequent that I get missed connection with it. Though I did have it behind the TV for a while and it was extremely spotty then, so YMMV.

      Also, they're not cheap, wait for them to go on sale online or at Fry's. Got mine for $60 for the mouse/kbd combo...two years ago.

    5. Re:All the buttons in the world by bhtooefr · · Score: 0

      103? So it's an IBM Model M13? :P

      (I've got an M13, an EnduraPro 104 (which has 106 buttons,) and a ThinkPad X61 Tablet (which has somewhere between 92 and 97 depending on how you count them.) ;))

    6. Re:All the buttons in the world by Christophotron · · Score: 1
      the lack of decent bluetooth mice is frustrating, to say the least... Razer makes a REALLY shitty one with lots of lag and stuttering. Logitech makes the v470, which works flawlessly but is really basic (2button+scroll only). Apparently Logitech used to make a bluetooth mouse resembling the mx518 but it was discontinued. I'd still like to pick one up on ebay though, it was the mx900.

      I hate the idea of proprietary RF devices and most of them really suck past 6ft away, anyway.. and when you lose that dongle, you are screwed.. Bluetooth is much better but only Logitech seems to get it right, and their options are extremely limited. if theres another company out there that makes quality bluetooth input devices that have good range, i'd love to hear about it.

    7. Re:All the buttons in the world by ciaran.mchale · · Score: 1

      The MX Revolution is a piece of junk. I absolutely hate it.

      How do you feel about the BlueTrack Screen of Death?

    8. Re:All the buttons in the world by willisbueller · · Score: 1

      Agreed! great mouse. and it works on a mirror! not that I use mirrors as mouse pads too often...but sometimes shit gets kinky.

    9. Re:All the buttons in the world by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I just user my finger for pointing.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    10. Re:All the buttons in the world by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Logitech MX500 wired mouse (and its MX518 current production descendant) is probably one of the best mouse pointers I've ever used--comfortable enough to hold in your hand easily, really nice positioning of additional buttons for various navigation needs, and enough "heft" to encourage accurate movement of the device. The only downside with the MX500 right now is that Logitech still hasn't see it fit to update their SetPoint software to support the full functionality of the MX500 under Windows Vista. :(

    11. Re:All the buttons in the world by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      I had all those problems with my *Bluetooth* MX1000. The double-click problem is why I replaced it, after about 3 years of clicks working fine - but it still lagged pretty often, especially when I had a lot of wifi traffic going.

      Now I have an MX Revolution, and it's not giving me any trouble. Maybe yours is just defective.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    12. Re:All the buttons in the world by DJ+Manning · · Score: 1

      I love my MX Revolution. It has all the buttons I need for gaming, a good feel and works nice with my mouse pad.

      Granted, it doesn't have the range of the MX1000, I could use that down the hallway in another room. The MX Revolution likes the dongle to be near it, I have mine about 15cm away from the mouse pad and it's fault-less there.

      It does work further away, but it'll have intermittent connection problems. But for a gaming PC with a normal 21 inch screen (none of this HDTV stuff that wouldn't fit in my house) it's a great mouse.

    13. Re:All the buttons in the world by MichaelTheDrummer · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with the MX Revolution has since been fixed with SetPoint Updates. The early versions made the middle mouse button the toggle for the regular and freewheel scrolling. Screw you if you actually wanted to use the middle mouse button *as a middle mouse button*. I honestly don't know who came up with that brilliant idea.

      But, I have to agree that the MX Revolution is a very nice mouse. With revoco I have it so the (otherwise useless) search button toggles the scrollwheel mode, and with btnx I have all of the mouse buttons working in Linux. The mouse is great once you fix the middle mouse button issue, now if these tools are packaged nicely by default in Ubuntu 8.10 things will be just fine.

  6. Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article:

    The Explorer Mouse uses a proprietary, Microsoft-designed complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) chip with advanced algorithms and pixel architecture for more precise tracking.

    Get it through your heads, fellows: Proprietary is not an advantage. Patented is not an advantage. Don't go crowing about it! Proprietary is what brought us Windows. Are we supposed to be impressed and go "ooh, more of that"?

    1. Re:Mice by ozphx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? Yes it is. Its an especially big advantage if the proprietary+patented new tech is actually better.

      Of course some open source people might have a cry about "teh evils", but to me that sentance means "You must buy the cool new tracking from us."

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    2. Re:Mice by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Propriety" and "patented" are there to show you that they're the only game in town with this technology, and that you can feel secure in buying from them without having to do anything like compare to other vendors, or anything else the intelligent consumer is supposed to do.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    3. Re:Mice by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't it would have been copied in China right after it shipped. Who would have developed that chip if they knew they would not get paid for doing so?

    4. Re:Mice by Anonymous+Conrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Proprietary is not an advantage. Patented is not an advantage.

      That's not from the article per-se, it's from MS's press release that the article quotes. The article tells you it's a quote and uses a different font even so it's pretty obvious.

      Patented and proprietary are advantages to MS's investors. That's why they put it in the press release.

    5. Re:Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... why would the Chinese bother to copy run-of-the-mill technology that isn't even patented? It's not like they are bothered by patents.

    6. Re:Mice by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      Umm... what? The line you quote is talking about a custom piece of *internal hardware* -- an Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). ASICs are very common in all kinds of devices and have nothing directly to do with software compatibility, hardware interfaces, or interoperability. All it means is that they made it a little cheaper (and possibly a little better) by using special-purpose hardware rather than a high-performance off-the-shelf microcontroller.

      --
      Visit the
    7. Re:Mice by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can get most 1st world countries to ban the imports of products that violate their patents.

    8. Re:Mice by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      What they're saying is that it's got something that other mice don't have.

      Pretty much everything brand new, at least in hardware, starts off proprietary because if it was already a standard it wouldn't be new.

      In addition, while you may or may not like Windows, Microsoft peripherals have been excellent for a long number of years. I still personally prefer logitech for mice, but I've been using a Microsoft natural keyboard for quite a few years now and it's one of the best keyboards I've ever had. Worked out of the box on linux too(minus the silly little shortcut buttons I don't use anyway but which all of them come with these days).

      Proprietary doesn't always mean bad, and open doesn't always mean good.

      Brand new technologies are expensive, and they're not generally designed by committee. Even new innovations in the open source world could be termed as proprietary because only one person is doing it.

  7. Just what we need... by dangitman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    We got some hands-on time with this handsome wireless mouse and were impressed by its tracking accuracy, stylish design, and mesmerizing blue glow.

    Yeah, because we haven't got enough glowing gadgets. I'm not sure who considers "mesmerizing" as a positive aspect of consumer electronics. End the madness, people! Or are you too hypnotized by blue LEDs to move?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Just what we need... by barzok · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's totally non-functional, but it moves units. And if your product isn't selling, what's the point?

    2. Re:Just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because we haven't got enough glowing gadgets. I'm not sure who considers "mesmerizing" as a positive aspect of consumer electronics. End the madness, people! Or are you too hypnotized by blue LEDs to move?

      What? I'm sorry, you were saying something, could you please repeat it? I was distracted staring at my glowing keyboard.

    3. Re:Just what we need... by Dracorat · · Score: 1

      I had this whole response thought out, but then I looked down at my Razor mouse and saw it was pulsing blue and then forgot everything I wanted to type. I'll get right on that after I look at it again

  8. Didn't you break a rule? by Bunderfeld · · Score: 1

    I thought any posting about Microsoft had to be hate-filled and fear-mongered at /.

    Aren't you going to get in trouble for posting that Microsoft actually did something right?

    1. Re:Didn't you break a rule? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, we all pretty much agree that Microsoft makes some decent hardware. If they'd stick to what they're good at then we'd all be happy with them. It's just when they try to get into markets where they have no competence, such as software, that people don't like them.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Didn't you break a rule? by Columcille · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I was a bit surprised as well

      --
      I love my sig.
    3. Re:Didn't you break a rule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Decent is relative. I have some of their hardware. The laser mouse left mouse button is a royal pain sometimes and the Lifecam was questionable. The wheel however is nice for the price and the gamepad/mouse was just funky.

    4. Re:Didn't you break a rule? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I just had a flashback to September 1993.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    5. Re:Didn't you break a rule? by speedingant · · Score: 1

      Decent hardware? Heard of the Xbox?

  9. Weird by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was very convinced that optical sensors was LESS picky than laser ones. Everyone I know have had issues with laser ones (ok, I may not have heard any complaints on the Logitech G5 but..)

    Haven't read the article though, just woke up. (My mouse is an optical Razer DeathAdder and works good as long as there are no huge contrasts on the material or on my white melamine (?) desk or white paper. Brown table, piece of unbleached paper box, pants, all good.)

  10. Warning for incredible retarded web design by aliquis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The linked review is one of those pages there the article uses at most 15% of the space but still had to be split amount 6 pages or so.

  11. A solution without a problem by erroneus · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just another optical type of mouse. What we really need is an ACTUAL mouse that has been genetically modified with a USB cable for a tail that can transmit the information issued to its brain by the aggregate information provided by its belly hair as you push it across any surface. More advanced versions will do the same using mental telepathy to another mouse head that was severed and merged with a USB dongle.

    1. Re:A solution without a problem by url00 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for this to come out! I already have $100 saved just for the basic edition!

    2. Re:A solution without a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      real geeks use only lab rats

    3. Re:A solution without a problem by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      mousehead in a dongle? How crude, we the brain of a mouse integrated into the computer which can have telepathic communication with any other mouse brain telepathy enabled devices.

    4. Re:A solution without a problem by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Or a mouse with a frickin' laser on its head.

    5. Re:A solution without a problem by PineGreen · · Score: 1

      What happens when an ACTUAL mouse shits?

    6. Re:A solution without a problem by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Well this would be a genetically modified mouse and would subsist primarily on USB power in much the same way plants get nourishment from the sun's energy. This doesn't answer the whole problem, however, the mouse's shit is the fed back to the mouse. In technical terms, it would be called a "feed back loop."

  12. Specs better but Technology Point-Less by Adambomb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Testing on granite, carpet, marble, and other surfaces, the reviewers were impressed with the responsiveness of BlueTrack, but they also noted that laser mice were competitive on these surfaces as well. Even though the mice didn't get a recommendation from the reviewers (price being a major concern), they did admit that this BlueTrack is the best tracking system available today.

    I wonder if they realize that this is flat out saying "yeah its nice tech, but no one really noticed much of a difference and isnt worth the price". Slashvertisements are getting a little weird these days.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
    1. Re:Specs better but Technology Point-Less by Starcub · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah I could care less about the tracking system myself, I still use an old MS Intellimouse ball mouse. No batteries to replace, no lag, and good enough tracking. I really don't need an LED on my mouse, or weights, or other gimmicks. All I really want is solid construction that will last.

      I might be tempted to upgrade if there was a significant reason to do so, like for example, the inclusion of an analog thumb hat switch similar to what the Saitek Cyborg mouse has. Unfortunately, I've yet to see a useable implementation. The Cyborg has a intrusive shelf on the bottom, so either you put your thumb on the shelf (awkward), you to put your thumb on the switch. Another gives no room at all to put the thumb, 'cause the switch takes up the entire face. Still another put it out of normal reach of the thumb forcing awkward finger positions to use it. Just a 4 position hat and not analog...

      Quite odd that nobody can seem to get it right.

    2. Re:Specs better but Technology Point-Less by Anonymous+Conrad · · Score: 1

      Yeah I could care less about the tracking system myself, I still use an old MS Intellimouse ball mouse. No batteries to replace, no lag, and good enough tracking.

      but you do need to de-gunk the internal rollers every few weeks. That's one thing I don't miss about ball mice.

    3. Re:Specs better but Technology Point-Less by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > The Cyborg has a intrusive shelf on the bottom...

      Don't you own a Dremel tool?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Specs better but Technology Point-Less by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I've personally found wired optical mice to be a huge improvement over ball mice, ball mice at least in my experiance gunked up quite frequently (though not as often as old laptop trackballs, they were horrible for gunking up).

      Wireless mice on the other hand i've found to be nothing but a pain in the arse.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Specs better but Technology Point-Less by ceoyoyo · · Score: 0

      Did anyone actually look at the diagram of how it works? It's an optical mouse with a blue LED in it. Ooooh shiny!

      The guy from MS being interviewed claims the blue LED works better like the cops on crime shows use blue flashlights. I guess if I lived in CSI and wanted to run my mouse on a semen splattered hotel sheet, I'd be all set!

    6. Re:Specs better but Technology Point-Less by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Ouch. I guess I let out the secret. Sorry Microsoft!

  13. A solution without a problem? by geekmux · · Score: 1

    There's apparently a problem with the ever-increasing popularity of granite and marble computer desks, complete with optional shag carpet mousepads.

    Mice are odd beasts. Seems you find one you get REALLY comfortable with, and stick with it forever. I've still got one of my favorites that the primary click button I have to find the sweet spot and mash down on it hard to get it to work, but the damn button arrangement and tracking is just so comfortable...Very few have really made THAT much of an impact to get me to switch long-term. Hate to say it, but Microsoft does manage to do some things right. Logitech has some nice hardware too.

    1. Re:A solution without a problem? by Columcille · · Score: 1

      "complete with optional shag carpet mousepads." Well I keep hearing the 70's are making a comeback so... just an example of trying to be prepared for emerging markets?

      --
      I love my sig.
    2. Re:A solution without a problem? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "There's apparently a problem with the ever-increasing popularity of granite and marble computer desks, complete with optional shag carpet mousepads"

      That's why I use a Logitech Marble Mouse.

      No RSI issues (for me anyway), no requirement to move the mouse itself, ambidexterous (I can switch sides while in my recliner or at my desk), and solidly built.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:A solution without a problem? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Well I keep hearing the 70's are making a comeback so... just an example of trying to be prepared for emerging markets?

      No, the 70s revival happened during the 1990s, we're at the peak of the 80s revival now. Fortunately, when the 1990s revival comes around you can can revive the 1990s' 1970s revival...?!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:A solution without a problem? by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      Ooh the marble mouse!

      I used one back in 2000 - 2001 and loved it! When I left the company I couldn't take one with and only recently saw them on the shelves again.

      Now I am a laptop user though so the trackpad is my weapon of choice as far as work goes.

      I live in South Africa and don't see many trackballs (like the marble mouse) for sale...

    5. Re:A solution without a problem? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I agree. Trackballs are always in a comfortable position, because you don't have to move them around. Also, they work on any surface. Even if you only have 12 sq inches of desk space. Try doing that with a mouse.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  14. seriously... by nx6310 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'd rather buy one cheap laser mouse a month for $10 than one $100 mouse for a year

    1. Re:seriously... by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhm...
      So you want to spend $120 a year on crap vs. $100 for something good?

      Now that makes a whole lot of sense..

    2. Re:seriously... by Columcille · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you'd rather spend $120/yr than $100/yr and get a lower quality product? And people wonder why the economy is in trouble.

      --
      I love my sig.
    3. Re:seriously... by Columcille · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I should have structured that differently: You'd rather spend $120/yr - and get a lower quality product - than spend $100/yr for a better product? And people wonder why the economy is in trouble.

      --
      I love my sig.
    4. Re:seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly why people who are bad at math lease things...

      Either that, or his mouse gets 'very dirty' quickly and is hard to clean so he'd rather do the landfill thing.

    5. Re:seriously... by hattig · · Score: 1

      My six (?) year old Microsoft Optical Intellimouse is still working fine, even though I've covered it in paint splashes and it's gone a rather nasty yellow colour.

      $100 for a mouse? Screw that.

    6. Re:seriously... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      My six (?) year old Microsoft Optical Intellimouse is still working fine, even though I've covered it in paint splashes and it's gone a rather nasty yellow colour.

      I'm still using my Logitech Mouseman mechanical model as my main mouse, despite its 9th birthday being imminent, the plastic having gone a bit yellow and the logo rubbed off the top (and there being a gap from when I took it apart and couldn't quite snap it together again). I can't recall ever having to have made any serious repairs/fixes beyond cleaning.

      'Course, I appreciate that there are probably many older mice in regular use...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:seriously... by Rudolf · · Score: 1

      you'd rather spend $120/yr than $100/yr and get a lower quality product? And people wonder why the economy is in trouble.

      Isn't the economy helped by people spending more money?

      That is - why do you think spending $100 is better for the economy than spending $120?

  15. Battery: 3 weeks !!! by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pass.

  16. Re:Battery: 3 weeks !!! by Columcille · · Score: 1

    Actually three weeks sounds pretty amazing for a wireless mouse, unless that is three weeks with very little use. A three week charge would be nice. I can only go a few days between charging mine.

    --
    I love my sig.
  17. Trackball by envelope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use a trackball, it works well on any surface at all - sand, carpet, wood, jello, etc.

    --

    appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars
    1. Re:Trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that it's not a mouse, and you have to clean the damn ball often..

    2. Re:Trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except you:
      -don't ever have a cord/wire attached to a moving device (which back then was heavy enough to often make the said mouse fall behind the desk...)
      -don't have to replace batteries in the said device (batteries being an attempt to solve the previous point)
      -don't ever have problems of it being not so responsive as batteries weaken
      -don't ever run out of mousepad area, then have to lift the thing, move it across the whole pad, and continue your previous motion (not as much of an issue nowadays, I know)
      -don't need to sacrifice much space on your desk to move it around

      It "just works", and once you're used to it, they're generally faster, and for some people even more precise.

    3. Re:Trackball by Fumus · · Score: 1

      That's probably just with the crappier ones. Mine needs a 30 second clean once a week or so. And I use it daily for hours.

  18. A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It is our honorbound duty as patriotic Americans to buy these innovative mouses. Microsoft is one of our great country's most productive companies. Through the genius and vision of Steve Ballmer, Microsoft has given us the finest quality of software available anywhere, but produced right here at home in America. Now it has outdone itself again, and shown how a vital new technology will transform the way we do business. I can see the entire world clamoring for these amazing American devices.

    However, we live in difficult times. We encouraged those who, (as governor Palin would say), come from the less "pro-America" parts of the country, to get uppity and cause our magnificent economy to falter. Instead of spending their money on crack cocaine and fried chicken, these folks thought they could sully our land and soil with their fake mortgages. How disrespectful. We could have forced them to pay for their risks and foreclosed them, which would have saved the our country's greatest institution: its banking system. Then Lehman and AIG could have stood proud and bought Microsoft keyboards and mouses instead of cheap Chinese crap which probably poisons you. Instead the Dems punished the hardworking financial executives for their success by legislating away their compensation. This is a slap in the face of Ronald Reagan and all he stands for. It is surely now of greater import and imperative than ever before that we the people, the real America, stand straight, step up to the plate in our nation's time of need, and buy these BlueTracks.

    As a proud Republican and supporter of the finest GOP ticket in decades, I am so hopeful for the future of our country. I was recently gobsmacked when I saw an electronic checkout system in our local WalMart! However, we must keep spending to save our economy. We need corporation tax cuts for Microsoft so they can continure their great work in showcasing the best of American values - then Steve Ballmer might be able to employ great, right-thinking folks like Joe the Plummer. We need to help Joe the Plummer buy a BlueTrack by giving him his choice of medical insurance, thereby saving money and not putting bureaucrats between him and his doctor. We need to stop wasting money on affirmative action and college scholarships so folks in real jobs like Joe the Plummer pay less tax and can benefit from tracking technology too.

    We need to work to save the pre-borns so they too can know the joy of these mouses. We need to fight to bring liberty, security, democracy and Microsoft hardware to Iraq. We are one nation, under God, and we see here right here in this article the evidence of his favor of our country! USA! USA! USA!

    Vote McCain/Palin 2008!

    1. Re:A modest proposal by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Creating an optical mouse using a blue LED instead of a red one, and then having the marketing department come up with a fancy name like BlueTrack really is the pinnacle of American innovation.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    2. Re:A modest proposal by quenda · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pinnacle!? You aint seen nothing yet. They have the next 5 years of releases planned, starting with a UV-LED mouse.
      In 2011 we will see the "Ultra-Trak Quattro" - five ultraviolet lasers, three gyroscopes, a GPS, and a spring-loaded lubricating strip.

  19. How about a trackball? by Fumus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use my trackball (Logitech TrackMan Wheel) almost exclusively for everything except playing FPS games.
    It just fricking rocks. After fiddling around with sensitivity and getting used to in (one or two days) it's the best mouse I ever had.
    Never again will I run out of space or need to lift my hand and reposition the mouse.

    Of course people who use mice to draw stuff will be somewhat crippled by it, as I have a little more difficulty when using it in order to doodle something quick in paint, but what self-respecting artist uses a mouse as their main drawing interface?

    1. Re:How about a trackball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      but what self-respecting artist uses a mouse as their main drawing interface?

      Disney?

    2. Re:How about a trackball? by MooseMuffin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Self-what?

    3. Re:How about a trackball? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for mod points!

      Oh wait, I don't have a kingdom either.

    4. Re:How about a trackball? by allgoodnamesaretaken · · Score: 1, Funny

      after using trackballs and Wacom tablet, going back to a mouse really does seem such a laborious activity.

    5. Re:How about a trackball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh no, not a mouse, I use a trackpad!

  20. Anyone actually read the review? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Anyone actually read the review?

    I'm curious on how much better it really is.

    e.g. latency, maximum tracking speed (many optical mice lose track if you move them really quick - and that sucks for many games).

    As for not being able to work on reflective surfaces, there are already cheaper "laser" mice that work on reflective surfaces.

    Maybe I should read the review - but I hate reviews that are split across tons of pages and turn out to be useless (e.g. PR/Ad company crap).

    --
    1. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the article suggests that the BlueTrack mouse only has around 800 dpi resolution/sensitivity. but considering that most laser mice have 2000-3200 dpi, BlueTrack doesn't seem more advanced than lasers. the only advantage i can see is that it works on more surfaces than laser mice can. but so do conventional optical mice, which can already go up to 1600 dpi.

      the Explorer Mouse is not very impressive or groundbreaking. i'd rather get a hi-res laser or optical mouse by Logitech at a lower price.

    2. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by Anonymous+Conrad · · Score: 2, Informative

      the only advantage i can see is that it works on more surfaces than laser mice can. but so do conventional optical mice, which can already go up to 1600 dpi.

      Actually TFA says that optical was worse than laser on the tricky surfaces:

      A very high-end Razer Boomslang CE optical mouse had trouble maintaining a smooth cursor. An Ideazon Reaper Edge laser mouse faired pretty well, but not perfectly. This just goes to show that laser mice and the Explorer are able to handle difficult surfaces more cleanly than optical mice.

    3. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by Zironic · · Score: 1

      You buy all your processors based on the Mhz number too I suppose?

    4. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      no, but i do go by benchmark results.

      as long as an optical/laser mouse is capable of functioning on conventional desktop surfaces, all that really matters is its sensitivity and resolution. i do a lot of graphic design work, and increased resolution/sensitivity was the reason i initially switched from a ball mouse to an optical mouse.

      i don't need a mouse that works on carpet. but if you want to pay $50 extra to have a blue light instead of a red one then good for you. i'll take superior performance on conventional surfaces over mediocre performance on surfaces that i'll never need to use my mouse on.

    5. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by Zironic · · Score: 1

      As I've understood the technology behind it these mice should be taking clearer pictures less often so it wouldn't suprise me if they'll outperform the laster mice on any surface within a few generations.

      Personally I wouldn't buy these first generation mice either, they cost about twice what I'm willing to pay for a mouse and their intended market is notebook productivity while I only use a mouse for gaming/desktop use.

    6. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But that isn't the general knowledge and opinion of me and many others. A friends MX revolution or whatever it was called, MX 1000 maybe? Some early laser one anyway jumped around a lot, my MX 300 was way less picky. I got the DeathAdder (optical) but haven't liked that it can't track on white surfaces or say a surface with lines in some pattern because it seem to fuck up by that, so obviously at least that one have some issues but I doubt it's worse than the average laser one. Also laser mice are well known for not working good on the glass pads and such, where optical mice do work.

    7. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by Zadaz · · Score: 1

      In addition my Logitech laser mouse also works on glass tables, carpet, and for fun I just tried it on a mirror and got very good tracking.

      I've got a wireless one that I use for my living room media center. It works on every surface in the room. (Though some, like my leather couch don't make great mouse pads because they cause a lot of friction.) I carry one with my laptop and I can't remember the last time I've found a surface that I couldn't track on.

      On the other hand my friend who uses the Apple mouse can't use it on anything that is even slightly glossy or has a highly regular pattern.

      No reason to create a whole new technology (unless you're trying to dodge patents). What's already there is great, though it clearly depends on implementation.

    8. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in the case of my mouse it can't be that the problem is that of the high contrast surface which probably gives excellent image differences back to the sensor (unless it uses some weird way of trying to figure out the exposure settings as well) but should rather be in the area of threating these images and understand what they mean when it comes to mouse movement.

      I guess.

    9. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I din't think I will be giving up my Logitech Marble Mouse...

  21. Is there a gain for trackballs? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    While this new technology may be great for mouse users, I'm not up in arms with joy. Would there be a gain for trackballs? I'm using the Logitech Marble Mouse(*), and as far as I can tell, the optics goes on between the ball itself and a camera below the ball; as a producer, you control the surface completely. Would there be anything gained by tolerating more diverse surfaces if you're never going to use them?

    (*) I can recommend everyone to go out and buy one, it's great. You can put more clutter near your 'puter since you don't need the surface to move the ball around, and it feels nice in your hands. It comes with scroll buttons instead of a wheel; if you use one as the EmulateWheel button (man ${xorg mouse driver}), you can use the ball as a vertical and horizontal scroll wheel. Horizontal scroll wheels is one of these things you don't know you want until you try it [so go out and try it].

    1. Re:Is there a gain for trackballs? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Would there be anything gained by tolerating more diverse surfaces if you're never going
      > to use them?

      I can think of none.

      > I can recommend everyone to go out and buy one, it's great.

      I second that. I can't imagine why anyone who has ever tried a trackball would go back to a mouse.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  22. Blue LED mod? by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

    Being a fan of blue LEDs since they were invented, I wonder what would happen if one switched out the red one in a typical mouse, and how much modification it would take for it to work.

    For the record, I like my old Logitech wireless. I discovered the charger in the base was slowly destroying the NiMH cells, so I run it without the cover and charge them with a Maha smart charger on my desk. It's just as well: it was hard to make positive contact with the base.

    --
    "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
  23. Please, no more damn mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring back the Trackball Explorer. Best pointing device that was ever made, by anyone. I have 2 and I wouldn't part with either of them even for the $200 asking price i see them going for on eBay.

    1. Re:Please, no more damn mice by funkdancer · · Score: 1

      Oooh, didn't know they were in such high demand! I have two myself, was using both up (home+work) until when I sampled the G5 -- and promptly bought another one. Now the Explorer is perfect for the laptop next to my main computer, and I guess the 2nd unit will be a good backup.

      Up until the G5, I never saw a mouse that could outperform trackballs for combating RSI.

      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
  24. Blue track...Blu ray...Blue this...Blue that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well blow me!

  25. Re:Battery: 3 weeks !!! by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Actually three weeks sounds pretty amazing for a wireless mouse

    I get much more than that with a wireless Intellimouse. ~70-90 days, maybe, before it yells. And the Logitech trackball is almost as good.
    And then, just swap in another pair of rechargeable AA's.

  26. Re:Battery: 3 weeks !!! by Skater · · Score: 1

    Until my cat chewed the USB cable, I had a Microsoft wireless mouse that would go months between battery changes, and I used it at least a couple hours a day. Everyone else I know with wireless mice said that they were always replacing batteries. What gives? The one I had (actually I still have it and would like to fix it, just haven't gotten around to trying) was an optical LED-based mouse. I think I'd replace batteries in it two or three times a year.

  27. No thanks, waiting for something better by eebra82 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm still waiting for the first GSM triangulation mouse, which will eventually be succeeded by the first GPS mouse.

  28. Just what we need...Nightlight. by Ostracus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh I don't know. I haven't needed a nightlight since I got into consumer electronics.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Just what we need...Nightlight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't needed a nightlight since I turned 8

    2. Re:Just what we need...Nightlight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i got into consumer electronics when i was 6.

  29. As a Linux user by FlyingBishop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can also say that I've always enjoyed Microsoft's mice, especially their Intellimouse Explorer, and will probably continue to do so.

    And this sounds like a nice step forward. But $100? I could get a secondary monitor for that price. Or enough ram to max out my 32-bit system. Or a new hard drive so I can raid my system. The list goes on. Also, I'd prefer to be rid of my mouse at this point. Unfortunately, hitting those slashdot preview/submit buttons is a pain in the ass without a mouse.

    1. Re:As a Linux user by prestomation · · Score: 1

      I still use a "Microsoft Intellimouse Optical 1.1a" 7-button. It's older then I can remember and it rocks.

  30. 7% of the Population by abarrow · · Score: 1

    Leave it to Microsoft to not consider the 7% of the population that is left handed.

    "They're probably lefty commie Mac users anyway"

  31. Better buy them up quick ... by louzerr · · Score: 1

    ... before the touch screens become the default pointing device!

    Also, is there much point in having a mouse that offers better precision than my hand can deliver? For those who need precision, wouldn't a stylus be a better choice?

    They may as well put together a VCR that can record in High Def with Digital Surround Sound.

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
    1. Re:Better buy them up quick ... by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      If I need precision I'll just type where I need the mouse to go. You might be surprised how easy this gets. I had to be thrifty back before I even had an optical mouse and I used this application to type +x400 pixels and -y318 pixels.

      I just wish I could remember what it was called. I can't seem to figure out the right words to google it.

      Of course, I didn't use this for every little thing like I do with a mouse now, I became very familiar with every keystroke Win98 had to offer. I could have used the mousekeys but they were so frustrating sometimes, even with the speed modifiers.

      I wish I'd been into GNU/Linux back then, I tried I think it was Caldera first because my dad bought it and he couldn't do anything with it, guess why it took me so long to try another dist.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    2. Re:Better buy them up quick ... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      On Linux xdotool will do what you want.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  32. Bwa? by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    Short of mirrored and reflective surfaces? That's very interesting, considering I use a mirror as my 'mousepad' for my optical mouse and it's the best mousepad I've ever used.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  33. I doubt it! by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

    "they did admit that this BlueTrack is the best tracking system available today."

    I take it the reviewers never used a Wacom Tablet. Granted it does not run on any surface... But it is wireless, never needs batteries, is more accurate than any mouse out there (Yes even gaming mice), And comes with a pet for graphic work as well.

  34. OT cheap gaming mice? by Sark666 · · Score: 1

    I remember when optical mice first came out, they were actually worse in a sense than the old ball/roller based mice. For gaming if you would move the mouse quickly from side to side, your pointer would lose track sometimes and typically would go lower and lower instead of panning across the middle.

    Long fixed with optical mice, but I've had for a few years a fairly nice logitech that needs replacing.

    Is it still pretty much necessary for gaming to get a high end mouse? I believe when they made dual optical it solved the tracking issues, do not all mice by now have dual tracking?

    I'm not so concerned about some insane dpi, I just don't want the pointer drifting if it's used quickly. When I look at reviews, it's usually for highend mice; it's hard to find out info on current run of the mill mice.

  35. Kudos to MS by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    Well I am by no means a Microsoft fan, and vastly prefer a thumb trackball over a mouse. But for once, MS has actually come up with something new and innovative that truly is new and innovate. I at least have not seen any tracking system like this before. It's not a huge improvement over current laser mice, that is true, but it is a definite improvement. Better DPI will come with time I am sure, as will lefty/ambi mice.

    So give credit where it is due.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    1. Re:Kudos to MS by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I at least have not seen any tracking system like this before.

      Really? It's just an optical mouse with a few incremental improvements: Larger sensing area, blue light, better optics. Progress for sure, but it's not fundamentally different to existing optical mice.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    2. Re:Kudos to MS by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The standard MS optical mice are perfectly fine for me.

      The Intellimouse ones are great is you want extra buttons.

      I have no problems kicking ass in games, and I think anyone who spends more than $50 for a mouse is retarded.

  36. Oh wow. They made the LED Blue and pattented it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is total BS. You can replace the red LED in a regular optical mouse with a blue one and it works just fine. So, what exactly is revolutionary about this? Nothing. Custom CMOS designed by Microsoft just for this mouse? BS. Super duper optics? Please.

    Typical Microsoft marketing crap:

    "Hey guys, we haven't done a new mouse lately."

    "Well, I'm afraid there's not much more that we can do. Apple already scooped us on infrared lasers. What else is there?"
    ...

    "Hey, I know! Make it blue!"

    "But, sir, that's not exactly 'new'."

    "You ever seen a mouse with a blue LED?"

    "Well, no . . ."

    "Great! Then we can patent it!"

    "But it's just a different color. Don't you think that's just a little too 'obvious'?"

    "You must be new here, kid. Nothing at Microsoft is ever too obvious. Don't you worry. I'll talk to the guys in hardware and convince them they just invented a new sensor. The boys on the patent team will eat it up. The public will go 'Ooooo! It's blue... So pretty...' And we can charge three times as much without spending a penny more!"

    "Brilliant!"

    "Brilliant!"

  37. Re:Battery: 3 weeks !!! by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

    Really? I think the last time I changed my cheap Logitech wireless mouse's battery was 2 months ago.

  38. I want one that works on mirrors--here's how by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Funny

    This continual failure of mouse makers to address mousing on mirrors annoys me. Hey, mouse makers, here's how you can address this.

    Originally, your mice were based on a rolling ball. The mouse felt the ball rolling, and figured out the movement. In human sense terms, your mice were based on touch.

    The current mice are based on sight. They look at the surface under the mouse and see the relative movement.

    The sense you should be looking at is smell.

    In the center of the bottom of the mouse, there should be an emitter that leaves a chemical trail on the mousing surface. The rest of the bottom of the mouse should be covered with odor sensors that can sense when they are near the chemical. By laying a pattern of odors, and sensing them as they move under the mouse's "noses", the mouse can determine position.

    Think ants and the chemical trails they leave to find their way around.

    Not only would this address the mirror problem, you could also use this technology to address a serious workplace health issue. You could make it so the tracking chemical has antibacterial properties. This would help keep shared computers sanitary during cold season, reducing sick days and boosting overall productivity.

    1. Re:I want one that works on mirrors--here's how by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

      One problem. Right now, I don't have to worry about replacing my mouse juice for the thing to work correctly.

    2. Re:I want one that works on mirrors--here's how by value_added · · Score: 1

      The rest of the bottom of the mouse should be covered with odor sensors that can sense when they are near the chemical.

      Your idea is an interesting one, and while I am interested in subscribing to your news letter, I wonder whether you've considered the following:

      "Oh, look! Cheese!"

      My opinion is that if we go down this route, we should re-evalute the rodent model. Cats might work, but dogs would seem the better choice.

    3. Re:I want one that works on mirrors--here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that hard radiation would be a better sense. Embed a x-ray source in one front corner of the laptop or PC monitor, and a beta radiation source in the other, then use the intensity differences from geiger counters in the mouse to figure out the position. The beta radiation will give a finer tuning of forward/backward as it drops off in air, and x-ray vs beta ratio gives left-right movement.

  39. I've liked MS mice for a long time by wwphx · · Score: 1

    When I went from PC to Mac, I bought a decent USB wireless mouse and it worked fine for a long time. Then I tried to use their "Mac" Bluetooth mouse: doesn't work worth **** with Macs, Best Buy said they get lots of returns on those. So I tried an Apple BT Mega-Mouse, was not impressed with that. Finally found one that was BT, had a decent feel, and good right click support, so I'm content.

    But I am definitely troubled by this right-handedness. I can mouse with my right hand, but it's uncomfortable and I'll only do it if I'm briefly using someone else's PC. I don't mind if they do a mouse for righties, but they're ticking off lefties by cutting back on their ambi mice.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  40. Just what technology needs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another excuse for more blue LEDs!

  41. TrackBall anyone? by dindi · · Score: 1

    Sorry for being off topic, but all I want from the pointing device business is to put some innovation into trackballs.

    I use a Logitech Trackman wheel (left thumb operated optically read (red dotted) ball.

    The device is great when new, then degrades when the rollers and the ball surface loses its "shine".

    As for the original topic: a laser mouse works fine for me when I use one on most surfaces except glass. Plastics are the best as they are low friction, while glass "sticks".... I have an older explorer mouse and a mighty mouse .... but then again I haven't used a mouse since I stopped playing on the PC ..... (that is also when I stopped using a PC, and even when I turn it on I use it over synergy with a trackball) ....

    I do not even care about the degradation as the life span is comfortable 5+ years (I had button problems on one I got in 2002).

    All the damn thing needs is :
    1. Scroll ball (as in mighty mouse from apple). Maybe just a side scroller (tilting wheel would do it)
    2. 4-5 extra buttons.

    When that is done I start whining for a keyboard like the apple aluminium which is possible to "split" for ergonomic setting :)

    1. Re:TrackBall anyone? by Teilo · · Score: 1

      Can't stand those thumb-balls. I love the old Microsoft Trackball Explorer fingertip ball (I use it on my macs all the time, and with ControllerMate IV can program it however I wish). The ball NEVER dulls or scratches. It does, however, occasionally need lubrication (nose grease works perfectly). Pop out the ball, and blow it out occasionally, and flick the dust off of the three surface contacts. Going on 5 years on three of them. No problems.

      I'll never understand how you thumb-ball guys get any control out of those things. I can be so precise with the fingertip balls (I do a lot with graphics design so that's important). Of course, you probably think the same about us fingertip guys.

      --
      Mir tut es leid, Menschen daß Einfältigfehlersuchenbaumfolgendenaffen sind.
    2. Re:TrackBall anyone? by dindi · · Score: 1

      Haha .... I can imagine fingertip, however it is linked (in my head) to left click.

      I think the mouse key-scheme (3 buttons and scroller) are very nice, and then you have the thumb left for control. Steep learning curve I know, but as soon as you are used to it it is just sooo nice.

      Oh, by the way, as you know a trackball repels people from your computer. No one can use it, and if they try in 2 minutes they are screaming :)

      I do programming and surfing with the ball, and it is all-right. I usually work on a 19" + 24" at work, but at home I use 13+19+22 and sometimes have a 17 next to them, and civering that with a mouse is just a pain in the butt ..

      Hmm ... still I need more buttons.... I even though of just getting a drill and hacking a "many button" mouse inside the trackball. I need a one click access to expose, spaces and maybe dashboard. Yep, I use a mac to program mostly PHP, ASP Dashboard and yahoo widgets (and whatever else comes my way:) ....

  42. I have a mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It works on smooth and rough terrain, carpet, granite and even reflective surfaces. It uses a ball. Boo-ya.

  43. Isn't this just a laser mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the pains taken in the write-up not to explain the underlying tech, I suspect this is just a laser mouse with some minor improvements. Blutrack makes me think they have just used the throw-aways from blue- laser productions for blu-ray drives. So the tracking might be a little better (improved aperture) and energy requirements a little less, but that is about it.

    If I am wrong, what is the underlying tech here? Why so secretive?

  44. uh, any surface? by cratermoon · · Score: 1

    I've preferred a wonderful pointing device that works on any surface, or even no surface at all, for a long time. It's called a trackball.

  45. Trackball explorer by fortunato · · Score: 1

    Unless they bring back their Trackball Explorer (hands down the BEST trackball ever produced) I'm uninterested. :P

  46. Works on more surfaces? Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Logitech TrackMan works anywhere you can find a 4x6 inch patch of solid surface to set it on, including shiny ones.

  47. Position of the sensor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come the sensor is still smack in the middle of the mouse? It was necessary in ball-type mice, but the sensor on optical mice can be almost anywhere. It makes most sense to put it directly under your forefinger.

  48. Re:Battery: 3 weeks !!! by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Buy a better mouse. The two alkaline AAs in this LX8 have lasted a couple of months of heavy use so far and, if Logitech are to be believed, can go for as long as 8 months. I've not turned it or the computer it's attached to off in that time. When the alkalines die they'll be replaced by low-self-discharge NiMH batteries (eg. Sanyo Eneloop) and I expect to go months between charging them.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  49. Blue light just like TV Crime scene... by sam0737 · · Score: 1

    From TFA "The physics is similar to that of the âoeblue lightâ used in crime-scene TV shows to examine surfaces for police investigations."

    While that's not what I am going to try, does it work over semen?

  50. Re:I Tested It With Vista by BattleApple · · Score: 1

    try it with Mojave!

  51. Suplus equipment by liamoshan · · Score: 1

    I suspect this is a clever attempt to offload tens of millions of excess HD-DVD components by sticking them in a mouse and calling it new technology

  52. Pass, righty only by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I pass on two reasons. #1, I'm left handed, two, the receiver is the size of a normal flash drive! I use a Logitech nano, because you can leave the fricking receiver in the laptop all the time without having fear of snapping it off.

  53. 1 whiff of ball sweat... by dj42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    and it opens up your favorite porn web site.

    --
    We are one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. Back to you with the weather, Bob!
  54. Re:Battery: 3 weeks !!! by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

    Another +1 Buy a better mouse. I've got a Microsoft IntelliMouse Explorer 2.0 optical and it last months without replacing the batteries. Come to think of it, I'm pretty sure I replace the batteries in the "Wireless Desktop Elite" keyboard more often than I replace the batteries in the mouse. 3 weeks is appalling, assuming that's for normal usage (a few hours a day).

  55. Laser still rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is it more advanced, if laser mice are still competitive on the same surfaces?

  56. Blue is the new Blue by Circlotron · · Score: 1

    Bluetooth. BluRay. BlueTrack. I think my brain just blue up :-(

  57. But... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    my mouse has no lasers or wireless.. you insensitive clods!!

    Occasionally I do tape a laser pointer to the mouse just so I can say "Mice! With Laaaaseeer beams!".

    It amuses me and annoys the kid. Heh.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  58. What WAS I Thinking About? by Illbay · · Score: 1

    Just when you thought laser and optical mice were enjoying their reign on mousepads worldwide...

    Whatever I might have been thinking about, I assure you it wasn't that.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  59. I was interested until... by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    I found out that it didn't use Bluetooth. I don't want crap sticking out the side of my laptop. It's too easy to break off. Honestly, I'd buy one if it had Bluetooth in a hot second because when I use my laptop, I may be sitting in a comfy chair and want to use the armrest as a mousepad.

  60. Re:Battery: 3 weeks !!! by Viperpete · · Score: 1

    I have the MS Wireless Intellimouse Explorer 2.0 and use rechargeable Energizer 2500mAh NiMH and they last me 3-5 months of 8-12 hour a day usage.

    --
    loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
  61. If I could just get a lefty version... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    This would be an ultimate mouse.

    It's still not bad...

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani