Slashdot Mirror


Sniping Could Be the Next Killer iPod App

An anonymous Coward writes "Knights Armament Corp. who supply sniper rifles to the US military have developed a iPod Touch mounting system and software for the US Army M110 sniper rifle system. The use of off the shelf hardware no doubt cut costs and allowed rapid development of this system." If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

461 comments

  1. More gear! by barneco · · Score: 3, Funny

    Forget my aimpoint and NV gear...hook me up with the FLIR-enabled Ipod!

    1. Re:More gear! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ohhhhh but Apple just remote deleted the FLIR viewer program, too bad :( seriously, why would they want to use such locked down, proprietary crap that Apple has its usual power-hungry control over?

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    2. Re:More gear! by code4fun · · Score: 1

      Looks a bit clumsy... Better put some Loc-Tite on it. Otherwise, the iPod will vibrate lose after a few shots. ;-)

    3. Re:More gear! by themacks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is no reason for these to be on the internet, so apple can't do anything to them. It looks like they just found a cheap system capable of crunching some numbers with a good interface.

      --
      i read about it in a blog once
    4. Re:More gear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Get a grip, you moron.

    5. Re:More gear! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And a nice bright backlight to illuminate your face to the enemy snipers.

      Yup, totally practical.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:More gear! by themacks · · Score: 1

      Guess its back to sliderules and a flash light. Oh wait...

      --
      i read about it in a blog once
    7. Re:More gear! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I don't think a flashlight would be a very good idea for a sniper either. Still at least you could hide under a camo sheet while you were using it. Unlike this thing, which is attached to the barell. What happens if some app on the iPhone decides to turn on the backlight (or you get an SMS or phone call) mid snipe. Not only will light reflect of your face and give your position away, it would also mess up your dark adaption and dazzle you.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re:More gear! by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      It looks like they're intending to use this with the iPod touch rather than iPhones, so the phone/sms worry isn't there.

      Although it would be really really funny to find a calendar alert "kill CEO of ***" come up as you're lining up your shot!

      But seriously, how many sniper's actually fire in the dark? Isn't it kinda hard to see your target at night? I would imagine most of these jobs are during daylight hours, and that you're usually a really long way from your target, and that you have some kind of camo blanket that could be covering your face and the phone (only the barrel and the scope really needs to stick out of it right?)...

      This is probably a useful product.

    9. Re:More gear! by Mr.Intel · · Score: 1

      But seriously, how many sniper's actually fire in the dark? Isn't it kinda hard to see your target at night?

      Do I really have to say it? I mean, night vision goggles have been the staple of FPS fair since Quake 2.... They're so effective, they make filters that fit on standard sniper scopes and even dedicated night vision rifle scopes.

      --
      ASCII tastes bad dude.
      Binary it is then.
    10. Re:More gear! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      But seriously, how many sniper's actually fire in the dark? Isn't it kinda hard to see your target at night? I would imagine most of these jobs are during daylight hours, and that you're usually a really long way from your target, and that you have some kind of camo blanket that could be covering your face and the phone (only the barrel and the scope really needs to stick out of it right?)...

      This is probably a useful product.

      Actually someone gave me a copy of Sniper 1 for Christmas about the Siege of CIMIC house

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIMIC-House

      The UK snipers had various night vision sights and they actually fought off the Mehdi army round the clock.

      That's an extreme siuation of course, but given that US/UK armies have a huge lead in night vision technology it's actually safer for them to snipe when it's too dark to see.

      Dan Mills actually mentions dark adaptation at some point, and how bright lights cause you to lose it for a few seconds which is really not good.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    11. Re:More gear! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      the military has pretty sophisticated IR/night vision systems. i'd imagine that many sniper missions are carried out at night as it provides better cover for the sniper, gives night-vision-equipped snipers a significant advantage over non-night-vision-equipped enemy forces, and is more likely to catch the enemy off guard or with their guard lowered.

      there are many other advantages to using carrying out missions at night using night vision gear. for instance, warm bodies are illuminated and easily distinguishable from the background. and IR radiation allows one to see through smoke, vegetation, and even thin walls. you can also learn a lot about an environment by residual heat signatures--for instance, a car engine that's just been shut off, or a heat "shadow" left on an airstrip by a plane that recently took off.

      IR can also allow one to see farther through water vapor, dust, and pollution than visible light does. this along with pseudo-color can help the sniper to see in greater detail and more easily identify targets.

  2. Theme song by XPeter · · Score: 0

    This should be played after every bullet is fired.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d8C4AIFgUg&feature=related

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Theme song by cjjjer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually this should be played http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2b1D5w82yU

    2. Re:Theme song by hardburn · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more like:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMenB9Ywh2Q

      --
      Not a typewriter
    3. Re:Theme song by L0stm4n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Um..you are all wrong:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TDgkOOlbwg

      Rage Against The Machine - Bullet In The Head

      --
      superman runs linux
    4. Re:Theme song by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:Theme song by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Export version for the Israeli army.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Theme song by NuclearError · · Score: 1

      No, it needs to scream "BOOM HEADSHOT!!!" after after shot.

      --
      Nuclear engineers build weapons. Civil engineers build targets.
    7. Re:Theme song by anothy · · Score: 1

      ah. man, that movie rocked. why don't they make them that good any more? instead of that abomination of a remake, just re-release this one.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  3. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    MMMONSTER KILL

    1. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that's just great, now we'll have aimbots.
      What's next? respawn spammers?

    2. Re:Oblig by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Troll
      My big questions is:

      When will this be available in the app store so everyone can buy one? I mean...isn't deer season coming up soon???

      Come to think of it...next hurricane that hits....this would come in handy against looters. Gotta make sure and keep the iPod charged....target rich environment!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the obligatory OMG HAX!!!! fsckin aimbot n00b! and campers suck!

    4. Re:Oblig by __aaoyac5342 · · Score: 1

      HOLY SHIT!

    5. Re:Oblig by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      The brain is probably better at looking at an image and instantly finding targets' heads, even with modern adaptive algorithms. And it's not like there's any way for the computer to actually move the rifle.

    6. Re:Oblig by shawb · · Score: 1

      Well, we've already got Wallhack.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    7. Re:Oblig by Thiez · · Score: 1

      > Come to think of it...next hurricane that hits....this would come in handy against looters. Gotta make sure and keep the iPod charged....target rich environment!!

      Why the hell would you use a sniper rifle to defend your home against looters? Is your garden really that big?

    8. Re:Oblig by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Troll
      "Why the hell would you use a sniper rifle to defend your home against looters? Is your garden really that big?"

      You're thinking too small....you're not just looking after yourself and your home, but, more of a 'neighborhood watch' type thing.

      You don't want them stealing your neighbors stuff just because they aren't back yet, do you?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Oblig by Thiez · · Score: 1

      I suppose I'm an idiot for thinking that objects, either my own or those of my neighbors, are not worth killing for.

    10. Re:Oblig by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Troll
      "I suppose I'm an idiot for thinking that objects, either my own or those of my neighbors, are not worth killing for."

      I would not call you an idiot...but, we do think differently, and I'm guessing you have not gone through or seen anything like the rampant looting that happened post-Katrina.

      Basically, only the threat of that kind of penalty would stop those 'animals'. And if you were in your home when they came about, it wouldn't just be your stuff in danger, trust me.

      And frankly, I'm guessing you may not be from the south? Down here, we take intrusion on property and theft pretty seriously, God help you if you get caught doing stuff like that in TX....you can lawfully shoot someone stealing from your property pretty easily.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  4. haha!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they chose a closed piece of Apple hardware... I can hear slashheads exploding.

    1. Re:haha!!! by emag · · Score: 1

      No, you won't. Apple always gets a free pass, because they're "hip".

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    2. Re:haha!!! by dreemernj · · Score: 4, Funny

      And now you can shoot from the "hip"

      --
      1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
    3. Re:haha!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Naw, it's just another cheap ballistics calculator for a PDA, they've been around since Palm/PocketPC days and I wouldn't be surprised if there was one for newton somewhere. A good one ties into your scope automatically. You punch in the figures, aim, and, pow, cake in the rain.

    4. Re:haha!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can hear slashheads exploding.

      If this thing's accurate, definitely.

    5. Re:haha!!! by genner · · Score: 1

      And now you can shoot from the "hip"

      Not with a sniper rifle.

    6. Re:haha!!! by ineedbettername · · Score: 1

      *whoosh!*

    7. Re:haha!!! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Looks like he didn't have a ballistics calculator! I wonder how long it will take him to rel

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. very useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now i can easily check my kill:death ratio!

    err wait...

    1. Re:very useful by baboo_jackal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the one situation where a DivBy0 error is good news.

  6. On your Marks.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes it so much easier to find the Dinty Moore Beef Stew.

  7. And with new iLife 09 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Photo face recognition can help you identify who you just shot!

    1. Re:And with new iLife 09 by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that could help US snipers to actually shoot the correct targets. You can get photos of target to iPod to show you next your scope. And after kill or before you get captured, you could delete all the information from device. No papers left to investigate etc.

      What actually scares me because snipers (sorry, US millitary wants that own snipers are called as "sharpshooters" because it does not have such bad sound than snipers, and it should tell people at home that own boys/girls are really accurate shooters.) should be smart enough so they can work alone behind enemy lines. They should not relay anykind electronic devices. It is important that they can calculate math in their head, without needing a electronic device. Most important information should be given them how to operate even when they would be week away from connection to other units.
      Best snipers does not even use the scope, because it can give your position away, get broken etc. And still you should be able to kill a target with headshot from 800m without scope. Even WWII snipers could do this... with normal rifles.

      If snipers now needs/gets a iPod to be included in their gears, I say they do not deserve the definition Sniper/Sharpshooter. They are just christmas tree of the battlefield.

    2. Re:And with new iLife 09 by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      The best snipers don't even use scopes? I'm calling bullshit. Do you even shoot? If so riddle me this - how do you hit a target at 500+ yards with no scope? Let me guess.. skill! lol

    3. Re:And with new iLife 09 by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      Marines qualify once or twice a year with a open post sight on targets that are 500 yards away. No scope needed.

      My Dad and I often headshot targets with standard AR-15 load at 550 to 575 yards. It's not that hard when shooting from the prone position.(The rear and front sights have a calculated range of 800m based on the rate of drop of a standard round.) The AR-15 doesn't have have half the max range of a .50 cal Barrett. (Although the primary weapon of the scout sniper is now the M40A3 with a max effective range of 1000meters.)

      The hard part is leading your target and windage. Scopes just make the long shots easier, and impossible shots possible.

    4. Re:And with new iLife 09 by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected, you obviously know your topic.

      I can see how this would help calculate for wind and distance, but I admit I can't see a sniper wanting this on the battle field. More likely it would be bought by weekend shooters like myself who simply want a cool toy that helps me shoot better over longer distances. Taking an iphone into the field under battle conditions and expecting it to be useful? eh, not so much.

    5. Re:And with new iLife 09 by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      On those points, I agree wholeheartedly. Check out the M40A3 and the Marine Scout Sniper's comments on the weapon. Biggest complaints are weight and ability to rapidly engage with the weapon.

      This is a neat toy that might get used once and a while, but I expect it to be accompanied by a whole lot o bitchin'.

  8. Killer App by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    So this really is a killer app...

    1. Re:Killer App by Jonah+Bomber · · Score: 1

      Oh, geez...

    2. Re:Killer App by audunr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, and it comes bundled with the iPod Touch of Death.

    3. Re:Killer App by rastilin · · Score: 1

      So this really is a killer app...

      That is pretty twisted. Although it IS said that humor is the best defense mechanism to suffering.

      Still if I were giving sound effects to a rifle. I'd probably pick the sound effects from Portal. You know, "Are you still there?" and "I see you." in a high pitched kid's voice.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    4. Re:Killer App by mnky-33 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good job, you appear to have identified the pun in the article.

    5. Re:Killer App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this modded "5, Funny"? It is simply a repeat of the joke from the subject of the post. I know the modulators can't be bothered to RTFA, but can't they at least RTF subject-line?

    6. Re:Killer App by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Good job, you appear to have identified the pun in the article.

      Offer him some cake.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    7. Re:Killer App by nine-times · · Score: 1

      So is this related to the "iPod killer" I keep hearing about? I keep hearing about the iPod killer being released-- I guess because our prison system is overflowing and they're paroling killers-- but I've been wondering why he's called the "iPod killer".

      So he a sniper rifle with an iPod scope?

    8. Re:Killer App by supernova_hq · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Good job, you appear to have identified the pun in the summary

      There, fixed that for you.

    9. Re:Killer App by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that Amplitude Modulators, or Frequency Modulators?

      Or Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulators?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    10. Re:Killer App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job, you appear to have identified the pun in the title

      There, fixed that for you.

      Fixed. Dumbass.

    11. Re:Killer App by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 0

      With 55 or 64 grains of lead and cooper going at 3,250 FPS.
      Need I say more?

    12. Re:Killer App by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      ...or death!

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    13. Re:Killer App by thegnu · · Score: 1

      Go0d los, ysfu apfhear to haave idaentifrd ghe p0n is t4e atle

      Tsare, fsd tsfat or ou.

      Fid. Daass.

      fud ass

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    14. Re:Killer App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have the chicken.

    15. Re:Killer App by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      That is pretty twisted. Although it IS said that humor is the best defense mechanism to suffering.

      That depends who's suffering, doesn't it?

      I think you're neglecting schadenfreude. I think it's funny when bad things happen to bad people. Youngsters have a term for this, it's called lulz.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    16. Re:Killer App by tcolberg · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the more pernicious slant of "lulz". Schadenfreude can be laughing at someone who slipped on a banana peel or BillG getting pied. People use lulz to justify aggressively anti-social, sadistic, and purposefully hurtful behavior towards others.

    17. Re:Killer App by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the more pernicious slant of "lulz". Schadenfreude can be laughing at someone who slipped on a banana peel or BillG getting pied. People use lulz to justify aggressively anti-social, sadistic, and purposefully hurtful behavior towards others.

      You mean like atomizing their brain from 1500m? Hell, if you used an iPhone you could write up the post pics on /b/ too.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    18. Re:Killer App by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. It's a ranged weapon. Now, if we get one of these babies on a katana, *then* we get a touch of death.

      --
      -- dnl
  9. The Source from Knights Armaments by nweaver · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Knights Armaments page on both the software and the mounting system.

    Really allows you to reach out and touch someone with your iphone.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:The Source from Knights Armaments by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. Don't use the iphone, only the ipod touch! If you use the iphone, the ZOG/NWO/UN killdrone occupation forces will be able to track you through AT&T's cell network. Only the touch is Patriot-Safe(tm).

    2. Re:The Source from Knights Armaments by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I work for ZOG/NWO/UN occupation forces. Oh, and could you move a bit closer to the window.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  10. Out of line by ktappe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

    Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable?

    (And yes, I know my comment will get me modded down, but I strongly doubt I'm alone in thinking a real life killing is quite different from killing in an FPS.)

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    1. Re:Out of line by Lightwarrior · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I also found it tasteless. Center-of-mass hits are much more reliable than head shots.

      --
      Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
      World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
    2. Re:Out of line by red_blue_yellow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I also found it disturbing. The death of a human should not be treated so ... disgustingly. Somebody needs to do something about Samzenpus and the garbage he puts out.

      --
      A neutral communications medium is essential. It is the basis of science, by which humankind should decide what is true.
    3. Re:Out of line by courtjester801 · · Score: 1

      But it kinda takes out the potential for a "Ding! Fries are done" mp3 playback.

    4. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Somebody needs to do something about Samzenpus and the garbage he puts out.

      Definitely. Someone should shoot him with an iPod-enabled sniper rifle.

    5. Re:Out of line by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable?

      Yes.

    6. Re:Out of line by Gravaton · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'd go so far as to say "disturbing and objectionable" but definitely the kind of joke-in-poor-taste that results in an awkward half-chuckle and then a silent room.

    7. Re:Out of line by halivar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm firmly convinced that 90% of all offenses taken spring from a deep-seated human desire for martyrdom and it's accompanying ego-expansion. Somehow, in the state of having been offended, we believe we can attain the deeply satisfying, self-aggrandizing self-righteousness of an unjustly oppressed person.

      IOW, you're just looking for stuff to piss you off because you like it. Suck it up, princess.

    8. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. If you're gonna kill someone anyway (presumably justified by some sovereign nation) you might as well have an auditory confirmation. The loss of life is the only thing that matters, whether you celebrate with high fives, a grunt, or a small ditty of your own selection is a personal choice and irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Gallows humor is a proud military tradition and can alleviate the hardships of such a stressful occupation.

    9. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (And yes, I know my comment will get me modded down, but I strongly doubt I'm alone in thinking a real life killing is quite different from killing in an FPS.)

      Not anymore! With the brand new iSnipe you'll get to use your crazy aiming skills in real life!

    10. Re:Out of line by BK425 · · Score: 1

      Yes, easily as disturbing as a title that assumes only a sniper would be interested in ballistics.

    11. Re:Out of line by arcmay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely agree. The pun in the headline is a bad enough, but that "joke" is the most juvenile and disgusting editorial addition to a submission I've seen on Slashdot.

    12. Re:Out of line by canuck08 · · Score: 0, Troll

      It is disgusting.
      That is not a game controller people.

      Stop and think about what you're saying.

      Samzenpus, you should be ashamed of yourself.

    13. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you are! That was some funny shit!

      In this day and age we have to deal with those determined to injure or kill our troops abroad. It doesn't matter which side you are on in regards to whether they should or shouldn't be there. Personally I feel they never should have but now that they are there all that should matter is that the come out of it unscathed. To this end the Sniper is one of the very best stand off and deterrents to those that would do our troops harm. I think there should be many, many, more in the theater than presently are. The US has "F"ed up rules of engagement that routinely put our troops in grave danger and serve only to embolden and protect the enemy. Throw a sniper or two at a problem, split a few heads and watch the change. Indirect engagement is by far preferable. Good job to those that developed this tool to make the sniper more accurate.

      MIke O'Connor

    14. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more along the lines of the quake announcer myself.

      HEADSHOT! HEADSHOT! DOUBLEKILL! RAMPAGE!

    15. Re:Out of line by retech · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I read it and felt the same. While I do find dark and oft times off colour humour funny, this type of thing just makes me sad. We live in a world that not only makes killing easy, it makes killing others a fun and a game.

    16. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only objectionable if the kill is someone you know.

    17. Re:Out of line by sesshomaru · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes, and I think the most objectionable thing about it is that it wasn't funny. Think about it.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    18. Re:Out of line by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable?

      Naw. Now if, as you were into your BRASS cycle, a paperclip popped up on the screen .. that would be objectionable.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    19. Re:Out of line by revery · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

      Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable?

      Not only objectionable, but completely impractical. What kind of sniper would want to draw attention to his location by playing a theme song?

    20. Re:Out of line by canuck08 · · Score: 1

      May I ask, Halivar, if there is anything at all that you would consider offensive?
      Is there anything someone could say or do that would cause you to stand up and say: "Hey, that's not right. What you just said is disgusting."

    21. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even though I'm just a lowly AC, I'll concur as well. I don't want to say killing is never necessary (although I don't want to say it sometimes is, either), but NO MATTER whether it is, it's always a serious thing, and the death of any person is a sad occurrence and should never be taken lightly.

    22. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disturbing? No, many of us felt that way too.

      Objectionable? Horse of a different colour there my friend. A lot of Slashdotters are gamers, who have played FPSs (if you don't know what that acronym expands to - you prove my point) to the point of obsession. Some games reward stylistic performance, like head shots, with various cues like... music. There's the connection you're apparently missing that would have enabled you to not be a stuffed dick.

    23. Re:Out of line by BitHive · · Score: 1, Troll

      I didn't find it disturbing and objectionable so much as humiliating for whoever thought it was funny.

      There's no point in being offended by stupidity. Rather, we should pity the type of adult man-child that makes such jokes, even ironically, for they know not how much they embarrass themselves.

    24. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but I strongly doubt I'm alone in thinking a real life killing is quite different from killing in an FPS.)

      obviously, this joke is funny because real life killing is different from killing in an FPS.

      get over yourself.

    25. Re:Out of line by thethibs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow! An orgy of self-rightious political correctness. Can I play too?

      --
      I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
    26. Re:Out of line by LanMan04 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (And yes, I know my comment will get me modded down, but I strongly doubt I'm alone in thinking a real life killing is quite different from killing in an FPS.)

      90% of people on this board have experience with making virtual headshots. Real headshots, >1%. It's just what we know.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    27. Re:Out of line by couchslug · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's hilarious.

      (Sensitive people need a second, different internet.)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    28. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not that sniping for political gain is out of line... come on pll

    29. Re:Out of line by Talderas · · Score: 1

      By that logic, artillery fire or missile attacks are preferable to sniper attacks. Snipers are still direct fire, just from an extreme distance. You have to have line of sight in order to strike your target. Now artillery or missiles on the other hand, I don't need to see you to blow your ass away.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    30. Re:Out of line by halivar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course. That's why I said 90%, not 100%. But I'll tell you this: the things that offend me are all actions, not words.

    31. Re:Out of line by Duradin · · Score: 1

      The simple solution would be to put it on the m107 instead of the m110.

      Subtlety is not one of its strong suits.

    32. Re:Out of line by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I don't care what your ID number is, you MUST be new here.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    33. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, how is this a Troll? Those are the ingenious words of Mel Brooks!

    34. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

      Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable?

      (And yes, I know my comment will get me modded down, but I strongly doubt I'm alone in thinking a real life killing is quite different from killing in an FPS.)

      yes

    35. Re:Out of line by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      When your name is 'RoFLKOPTr' it's probably pretty easy to think that everything is funny - especially when it isn't.

    36. Re:Out of line by frostband · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd say 99% of people have made real headshots. I'd even say 1%.

    37. Re:Out of line by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Naah. There are a number of people who make so many other people's lives so miserable that their deaths should be celebrated. For example, Kim Jong Il, Stalin, Hitler, and so on. There are numerous smaller warlords and tribal leaders who also deserve such treatment.

      Life is not sacred. If you use yours to deny other people rights, livelihoods or even their own lives simply for existing, you deserve to lose yours.

    38. Re:Out of line by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I think that these new "iPod" thingies have this nifty 1/8" or so hole in them that you can fit "headphones" into that would allow the user to hear sounds created by the device, but not other people.

      If you're talking impracticality, talk about the backlight of the LCD giving the sniper away in dark conditions rather than the sounds.

    39. Re:Out of line by mrdarreng · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs to do something about Samzenpus and the garbage he puts out.

      Let's string him up!

    40. Re:Out of line by arcmay · · Score: 1

      Har har, very original. I've been visiting /. for a LONG time, and that feeble attempt at humor crossed a line. I'm not the super sensitive type, I just don't think it is appropriate to put that kind of content in the summary. If that joke had appeared in the comments, I wouldn't have found it particularly clever OR worth objecting to. I do think some of the jokes in this thread are actually pretty funny.

      Keep the crass childish humor in the comments section where it belongs, samzenpus.

    41. Re:Out of line by Starve · · Score: 0

      So a guy cracks a joke about having a rifle attachment play a theme song. Will this man ever put his hands on a M110 Sniper Rifle? Highly doubtful. the humor may be lost on you, but please don't be so upset over what some editor says on the internet.

      --
      You have been sig'd
    42. Re:Out of line by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Center-of-mass hits are much more reliable than head shots.

      Yeah, but a head shot with a "pink cloud" is a confirmed kill. If the target is worth sending a sniper and you only get one shot, go for the sure thing.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    43. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently not very well.

    44. Re:Out of line by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Try to cry less, please.

    45. Re:Out of line by tmosley · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the only type of orgy Slashdotters get invited to, so we have to take advantage of them when we can.

    46. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Music would definitely be a pretty tasteless way to handle the death of another human being.

      A .wav file of "Boom, headshot" on the other hand...

    47. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a clue dude, you are a prime example of girlie boys brought up by feminist.

      This is an excellent application, a little funeral march tune after the kill seems appropriate.

    48. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should there be a difference?
      Isn't that what FPS's are doing to gamers?
      To blend the lines between reality and fiction?

    49. Re:Out of line by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      but I strongly doubt I'm alone in thinking a real life killing is quite different from killing in an FPS

      Not according to Jack Thompson....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    50. Re:Out of line by Xemu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I also found it tasteless. Center-of-mass hits are much more reliable than head shots.

      No, you have to remember that the only way to kill a zombie is by shooting it in the head

      --
      Tell your friends about xenu.net
    51. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are fighting an insurgency that is divided along political lines in heavily populated urban areas, with mixed populations, artillery and missile strikes are generally looked down on. Take Israel's recent work. More that half those killed were women and children. Hey, that's not good, but doing it in Baghdad is going to mean that a good portion of those killed are going to be people who had supported you.

      Sniper fire generates very little collateral damage.

    52. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than one percent? Not very specific are you...

    53. Re:Out of line by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I strongly doubt I'm alone in thinking a real life killing is quite different from killing in an FPS

      In the case of sniping, or anything out beyond about 150m, it's actually remarkably similar. Training generally reduces it to a simple technical task (which is the point of said training). Now, face-to-face close combat, at less than 50m, that's different. Until a FPS can accurately reproduce the nervous, crampy tug-of-war sensation you get trying to hold still and point your rifle at your adversary's center of mass while simultaneously trying to squeeze yourself down to the smallest possible target while moving away from the rounds hitting the berm behind to you, it's all just a silly game.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    54. Re:Out of line by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2, Funny

      Zombie sympathizer.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    55. Re:Out of line by finity · · Score: 1

      Hrm. Mod the display to be near IR spectrum only. Then it'd be clearly visible on NVGs... I don't know how well that'd work from a human usage point of view, probably terribly.

    56. Re:Out of line by NonSequor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's something to be said for the idea that everyone should be given the chance to redeem themselves. In support of this argument I present Bertrand Russell's short story, "Josef Stalin's Nightmare", which describes what can probably be said to be the ideal punishment for Stalin, or any dictator.

      http://www.rjgeib.com/thoughts/stalin/stalin-nightmare.html

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    57. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the words of a former commandant of the Marine Corps: "It's FUN to kill certain people!".

    58. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more US troops that get killed in Iraq, the better. It serves them right for participating in such a disgraceful attack.

    59. Re:Out of line by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "I also found it disturbing. The death of a human should not be treated so ... disgustingly. Somebody needs to do something about Samzenpus and the garbage he puts out."

      He will surely be grieved and ashamed by the tiny amount of whining and ignore the many amused comments.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    60. Re:Out of line by hey! · · Score: 1

      In an odd way, I don't really think this kind of humor is about death, because people really don't want to think about death. It's just taboo violation humor, like talking about sex, or flaunting bigoted language. Death just serves as something that makes people feel uncomfortable and which you're supposed to be very circumspect when talking about. In a way it would be better if it were about death, or at least more educational, if you will.

      What really matters -- or I should say what ought to matter -- is whether the humor is clever or stupid. I say ought to because it's really, really futile to get yourself worked up over the stupidity of others. There's just too much of it. You only get bent out of shape when it gets drawn to your attention, but if you were really being aware, you'd realize whatever it is, it's just a drop in the ocean, a single electron in the Universe of stupidity.

      Which is why I can't be bothered by priggishness about offensive humor. Oh, I draw exceptions for things like cracking racist jokes when there's just one black person in the group. There's good, practical reasons for being against that. I don't worry about a single white guy in a group of black guys who tells racist jokes either, because there's nothing more to be done in that situation above what he's doing himself.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    61. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooooo....somewhere between 2 and 100%?

    62. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot moral degenerates such Bush, Blair and Ehud Olmert

    63. Re:Out of line by EGenius007 · · Score: 1

      What about the orgies of pedantry?

      --
      I know what you did last summer. Just kidding, I don't work at the NSA.
    64. Re:Out of line by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      Over one in a hundred? Yikes! *nervous look*

    65. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much >1%. You are saying at a minimum 1 in 100 people have shot some one in the head. wow seems high.

    66. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      headphones, motherfucker, do you use them

    67. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, some people being easily amused does not mean that most things are funny.

    68. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >1%?

    69. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much >1%. You are saying at a minimum 1 in 100 people have shot some one in the head. wow seems high.

      Well, to be fair, not all of them were with bullets.

      Bow-chika-bow-wow!

    70. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a number of people who make so many other people's lives so miserable that their deaths should be celebrated. For example, Kim Jong Il, Stalin, Hitler, and so on

      You forgot George W. Bush, you insensitive clod!

    71. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are not the only person to find "this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable" and unquestionably yes "a real life killing is quite different from killing in an FPS".

    72. Re:Out of line by mqduck · · Score: 1

      There is nothing cool about new toys to kill people with. I'm somewhat disturbed by every one of these military tech articles, but this quote goes beyond geeky fascination with all things hi-tech. This is simply "damn, killing people is awesome!"

      --
      Property is theft.
    73. Re:Out of line by revery · · Score: 1

      my sarcasm's sniPod is playing the head shot theme song right now.

    74. Re:Out of line by tsm_sf · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm firmly convinced that 90% of all offenses taken spring from a deep-seated human desire for martyrdom and it's accompanying ego-expansion.

      Well, that's because you're an asshole.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    75. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent +1, Tucker.

    76. Re:Out of line by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Heh, should have been "1%".

      Just say no to drunk posting.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    77. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reasoning is correct, but the conclusion you come to isn't. The "sure thing" is aiming at center-of-mass and hitting at all, not aiming at head vs. aiming at center-of-mass.

    78. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God then should be the first one dead, yet we "all" celebrate him , including Obama. In God's name more people got killed than any Kim Jong Il. Hitler, or Stalin combined. Technically speaking Hitler never himself killed anyone, yet unlike God, is not worshiped, and build temple and churches off the blood of those who were killed in his name.

        So it disquasting me beyond believe that before the great speech made by Obama, we had the servant of death telling all us to pray (of course in his "christian" ways) how God will bless and yaddah yaddah yaddah Obama. Obame made it on his own hard work, and with people who were there on the journey, THERE WAS NO GOD!

        Yet we all accept it, as normal. So, if you accept God as a normal thing, than all those other murderous and disgusting thugs should never be condemned.

        What happened to separation of Church and State, why do we provide legality and legitimacy to murderous elites pricks who hijacked morality, and re branded into their vision of what is right and wrong. That scum bag was against gay marriage here in CA, how is that justice that he talks? How we let these bafoons talk on behalf of God, take them seriously, and yet never hold them accountable?

        That was the LOWEST point of Obama's otherwise wonderful celebration. I really look forward to finally having an intelligent person in charge of our country.

        Constitution and Humanity should is the wisdom and guidance to Obama, not some invisible murderous asshole, who needs always your money, who denies you freedom of choice, who kills all who do not worship you.

    79. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also brilliant and amazing. And it's the coolest thing you'll see today. Maybe it will be in the top 5 coolest thing you'll see this week. Or is it? Click here to find out.

    80. Re:Out of line by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      nah...I've seen far more juvenile and disgusting editorial comments. You must be new.

    81. Re:Out of line by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth headset?

    82. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right you fuckin faggot, words never hurt anybody, only actions did, and you are a stupid fuckin faggot, but hey, don't let that offend you, ya faggot.

    83. Re:Out of line by thegnu · · Score: 1

      What about the orgies of pedantry?

      Well, actually, slashdotters all host their own pedantry orgies, and noone is invited. But then we all form a beowulf cluster.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    84. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A head shot takes one man off the field.

      A body shot takes two. The one you hit and the one that'll try to drag him away.

    85. Re:Out of line by Techiegeeks · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs to do something about Samzenpus and the garbage he puts out.

      Definitely. Someone should shoot him with an iPod-enabled sniper rifle.

      You made my day! I wish I had mod points! LOL!

    86. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't saying the words itself an action?

    87. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always felt as though behind every evil act by a rational person is a personal justification.
      The rational person can be reasoned with and redeemed.
      The irrational people, those who cannot be reasoned with or had no justification for their actions, are mentally ill and needs treatment.

      Due to our lack of technology and medicine our best cure is a bullet to the head.

    88. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its an ipod stupid, so he would have headphones on.

    89. Re:Out of line by tcolberg · · Score: 1

      Hmm, yes. Because what I'd want to hear after killing another unsuspecting human being is the Benny Hill theme.

      ...

      Come on people, we already do enough propaganda to dehumanize our enemies before we go to war, do we really need immediate positive reinforcement of that process? Maybe we should just go the whole Harrison Bergeron nine yards and put headphones on the soldier to blast away any thoughts of shock or regret after they take a life?

    90. Re:Out of line by zobier · · Score: 1

      Pedantry is generally a solo pursuit.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    91. Re:Out of line by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      You really think someone would be offended by such words? Who gives a fuck what some /. AC says?

      Hell, if I ever have kids, and they're hot, I'll tie them down and rape them myself while intravenously pumping almost-lethal doses of the most addictive life-destroying drug I can find. If they're not hot, I'll pay someone else to rape them. Maybe you!

      I did actually think the line in the article summary was a bit lame - I expected to read that in the comments. I think the summary really should aim a bit higher... but then I remembered what site I was on.

    92. Re:Out of line by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, that line was stupid: it automatically assumes that whoever is killed by a USA soldier is a bad person and should be killed no matter what.

      --
      Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
    93. Re:Out of line by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable?

      No, you're not.

    94. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think words can be offensive as well.

      I frequent /b/ and even I thought the OP was in bad taste!

    95. Re:Out of line by Edam · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but life is a precious thing (and no, I'm not religious). Even when someone's life is taken where they didn't deserve to have one and for everyone's benefit, it is still the ending of a human life, which is a shame.

      I, too, think that this subject should be handled with some respect. Or not treated quite so lightly at any rate.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master." -Pravin Lal
    96. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to be hot. They just need to have something warm and concave.

      It's awwwwwright.

    97. Re:Out of line by skulgnome · · Score: 1

      I agree. Tag this article "kike", "bastard" and "jew", for I don't see any other kind of person spouting such idiocy than a kike who's merely taking a break from masturbating to fresh images of mutilated arab children, a white froth playing at the sides of his mouth.

    98. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the best few line take on offense I have ever seen. Is that from some other source? Compressed version of some psychologist or something?

    99. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but thanks to the us army with sniper rifle+ipod all these bad people will be shot in the head together with their arabic women and children.
      Fortunately there are the americans doing the business of the whole planet and killing all these bad guys. Think what you want about life, sacred or not, but think it at home, where you have already enough problems.

    100. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > my balls playing the worlds smallest violin.

      Are you referring to your equipment?

    101. Re:Out of line by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The death of a human should not be treated so ... disgustingly.

      Aside from your total misapplication of the word "disgustingly" I'm not really clear on what absolute metric you are using to determine what should or should not happen.

      I'm glad that your moral compass is here to guide us all.

      Somebody needs to do something about Samzenpus and the garbage he puts out.

      Won't somebody think of the children?

      Your comment sickens me. Literally, as in, made me nauseous.

      "Somebody needs to do something" about your smug sense of moral superiority.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    102. Re:Out of line by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Until a FPS can accurately reproduce the nervous, crampy tug-of-war sensation you get trying to hold still and point your rifle at your adversary's center of mass while simultaneously trying to squeeze yourself down to the smallest possible target while moving away from the rounds hitting the berm behind to you, it's all just a silly game.

      Uh, your imagination can do that, if you just let it. (Cue "Imagination" song from South Park here. Imagine it annoying you in the background as you read my comment. Works best as a montage. You gotta have a montage.) When I am playing FPSes (I used to play quite a bit of TacOps) I cringe, duck, and so on. I'm sure I'd be more efficient if I stayed cold when I played but it's not as much fun. Get worked up!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    103. Re:Out of line by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's something to be said for the idea that everyone should be given the chance to redeem themselves.

      Have you seen the extent to which the planet has been deforested? We have an immediate need for large volumes of soil amendments.

      With that said, I do not believe in violence unless it is used to prevent immediate violence. Which is why I do indeed own a scoped, high-power rifle. :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    104. Re:Out of line by styryx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. People replying with the most offensive things they can think of does come across as a bit petulant. I'd have to side with halivar on this one.

      Personally, the only things that offend me are ignorance, bigotry and zealous hatred. Humour is the most powerful tool against fear; perhaps the only tool we all have. If you are offended by something someone says then you should ask yourself why you are offended. More often than not, it is because you see in yourself that which caused offence and believe that by attacking the source of the offence you can purify yourself of it... but this is all psychobabble.

      Don't you think if a sniper rifle played a theme song (big hint: giving away the location of the shooter!) it would be the worst rifle accessory ever? Do you think that if it didn't play a theme song after a head shot then it would be acceptable? That is what the gun is for, killing people! regardless of whether or not it has any accessories. If the poster hadn't made that joke do you think the gun would be less lethal? Is there something sacred about the gun that causes offence if you apply humour to its (wait for it....) designed purpose?

    105. Re:Out of line by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more.

      I feel something similar every time there's news about some new kind of weapon or gun, and I see some people posting like they just got a new toy to play with :(

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    106. Re:Out of line by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Oh, I draw exceptions for things like cracking racist jokes when there's just one black person in the group

      But if there are two or more black guys, bring on the racism! Dude, WTF? That's not cool regardless of numbers or target.

    107. Re:Out of line by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      So actions offend you (fair enough), but not the discussion or contemplation of actions?

      So for instance a gang rape would offend you, but not discussing & planning a gang rape?

      Talk can very easily become action.

    108. Re:Out of line by hey! · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at it pragmatically.

      If there is one white person cracking racist jokes at everybody else's expense, and he has no particular position of authority over them, while it's undesirable, it's hardly worth worrying about. It's just stupidity, against whom the gods themselves contend in vain.

      The one right most people seem to think they have, is the one that can't exist in a world in which stupidity exists: the right not to feel offended.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    109. Re:Out of line by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      So many people die in complete oblivion, with the world never finding out or giving a toss, that I for one would welcome the notion of my death being accompanied by a resounding "UNSTOPPABLE!".

      Besides, I'm not a terribly big fan of censorship.

    110. Re:Out of line by delysid-x · · Score: 0

      It's ok, if they're religious they'll be reincarnated... no harm, no foul.

    111. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The OP could have spent the time to come up with something funny.

    112. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from your total misapplication of the word "disgustingly" I'm not really clear on what absolute metric you are using to determine what should or should not happen.

      Let's be honest, most of SlashDot has a childlike aversion to being held to and sort of behavioral standards at all. Seriously, this guy is just stating his opinion about what should be posted on SlashDot. red_blue_yellow is not forcing anyone to do anything, he's just saying that he thinks that something should be done. And what kind of responses does this get:

      I'm glad that your moral compass is here to guide us all.

      See, that's what speaking your mind is. It's telling other people what your mind/conscience/"moral compass" is telling you.

      Your comment sickens me. Literally, as in, made me nauseous.

      "Somebody needs to do something" about your smug sense of moral superiority.

      No, red_blue_yellow is not eschewing moral "superiority" merely by stating his moral position. He is simply taking a position.

      I see way too much of this on SlashDot. Stating that you think that other people are wrong is not oppression, censorship, moralizing, or anything else. It's just speaking your mind.

      Here's my opinion: we need fewer people on SlashDot who think that anyone who is willing to take a position is by definition an oppressor of everyone who has a different position. Or to put it another way: grow a thicker skin, folks.

    113. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, this comment did strike me as tasteless, and seems to indicate that the author is unable to distinguish the difference between real life and his virtual world.

    114. Re:Out of line by CrtxReavr · · Score: 1

      Too that end. . .

      Why not just turn on a flashlight and wave it around over your head while stalking your target. This is a terrible idea.

      -CR

      --
      "So is the BSD licence even more 'free' (than GPLv2)? Yes. Unquestionably." --Linus Torvalds (TinyURL.com/2vugzl)
    115. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone needs to kick your ass so you could understand that anything related to war or killing isn't cool at all. i suggest a trip to darfur for a starter. may you find your moral compass there.

    116. Re:Out of line by arbarbonif · · Score: 1

      What about cracker jokes? Do you think whites are the only people capable of racism? What are you, some kind of racist?

    117. Re:Out of line by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      I strongly agree with you, and I happen to be one such easily amused person. That, of course, doesn't mean that discretion should go out the door. There are still fairly well-defined lines that, when crossed, will be offensive to a large demographic. The topic at hand is probably an example of a line that has been crossed.

    118. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go away.

    119. Re:Out of line by hesiod · · Score: 1

      That's not cool regardless of numbers or target.

      What about cracker jokes?

      See bold print.

    120. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of people on this board have experience with making virtual headshots. Real headshots, >1%. It's just what we know.

      90% of people on this board know which way round to put the > sign. The wrong way round, <1%.

    121. Re:Out of line by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      you can't unknowingly embarrass yourself. and if you actually feel embarrassment for someone else because they laughed at a crass joke on the internet, you've got some fucking problems.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    122. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ear buds

    123. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me and your mother last night...*Quagmire voice* Alright!

    124. Re:Out of line by BitHive · · Score: 1

      Your balls are showing

    125. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though words come about through actions?

      You're a tool. And I'm not even going to say "sorry but, you're a tool", because I'm not.

    126. Re:Out of line by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Until a FPS can accurately reproduce the nervous, crampy tug-of-war sensation you get trying to hold still and point your rifle at your adversary's center of mass...

      Uh, your imagination can do that, if you just let it.

      True. I've just never been a big FPS player, so I never progress beyond "mild agitation" before I move on to something else.

      (Cue "Imagination" song from South Park here. Imagine it annoying you in the background as you read my comment. Works best as a montage. You gotta have a montage.)

      inhuman monster!

      When I am playing FPSes (I used to play quite a bit of TacOps) I cringe, duck, and so on. I'm sure I'd be more efficient if I stayed cold when I played but it's not as much fun. Get worked up!

      Heh. I'm already too twitchy. My nerves are pretty well shot from my wasted youth in the Army. I savor my life of quiet desperation now.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    127. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean 1%. Remember, the alligator eats the big number.

    128. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      words lead to actions

    129. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least some of us have balls. you fucking fruit loop. go suck more dicks.

      fucking bitch cunt whore.

    130. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

      Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable?

      Not only objectionable, but completely impractical. What kind of sniper would want to draw attention to his location by playing a theme song?

      The kind with headphones & as a sniper I DO think it would be the coolest thing ever.

      Just my 2 cents

    131. Re:Out of line by eggmit · · Score: 1

      If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

      Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable?

      Wow! An orgy of self-rightious political correctness. Can I play too?/p>

      I don't consider myself to be politically correct in the slightest; nonetheless, I also found the original comment to be a disturbing attempt at humor. I'm in a line of work (US Marine Corps) where the concept of a headshot isn't quite as abstract as it appears to be for the poster of the original "headshot" comment. My first reaction was of disgust, but I think the comment was simply born out of naivete -- all the OP knows of headshots is probably from playing FPSs. Hopefully one day he'll grow up and realize what he's really talking about.

    132. Re:Out of line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same sort who stand up, frantically wave, and yell "wave goodbye to your head, wanker" in a phony Aussie accent?

  11. Keeps track of points by the4thdimension · · Score: 4, Funny

    The military was the last bastion of "pen and paper" score tracking. Thanks to Apple's great products and a little ingenuity, the DoD finally has a tool to automatically keep track of scores. All we need now is a database for it to upload to automatically via wireless, and we can have a global real-time kill count and score!

    1. Re:Keeps track of points by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...the DoD finally has a tool to automatically keep track of scores.

      I believe the correct term is frags.

    2. Re:Keeps track of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there're enough frags to require scorekeeping, you're military is in *serious* trouble.

      Look up "frag" to see what it really means as a verb.

    3. Re:Keeps track of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable!

    4. Re:Keeps track of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, jackass. Look up frag and see what it means to us who defend your right to be a jackass.

      For the lazy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frag_(military)

    5. Re:Keeps track of points by Kingrames · · Score: 4, Informative

      frags, literally speaking, refer to killings of superior officers.

      I do believe sir, that you should use different terminology when marketing it to the military.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    6. Re:Keeps track of points by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Most companies have 360 reviews. why should the military be any different?

    7. Re:Keeps track of points by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      You have to get the grunts interested in it somehow...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    8. Re:Keeps track of points by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      no, jackass. Look up frag and see what it means to us who defend your right to be a jackass.

      I know what the term frag means. Try having a sense of humor sometime..you might find that you actually enjoy it.

    9. Re:Keeps track of points by gparent · · Score: 1

      I do believe sir you need to get a sense of humor.

      Frag is a term used in video games for kills. The parent obviously knows what it means in the real world.

    10. Re:Keeps track of points by TheCreeep · · Score: 1

      ...the DoD finally has a tool to automatically keep track of scores.

      I believe the correct term is frags.

      And it would be great if after five hits in a row it would growl "Impressive".

    11. Re:Keeps track of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a frag grenade to mask any evidence.

    12. Re:Keeps track of points by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "frags, literally speaking, refer to killings of superior officers.

      I do believe sir, that you should use different terminology when marketing it to the military."

      No, "fragging" does. "Frags" is the plural of "fragmentation grenades".

      http://home.mweb.co.za/re/redcap/vietcrim.htm

      FWIW:
      "Frag order" is a (WWII vintage at least) military for "Fragmentary Order" that is still in standard current daily use.

      Military folks are proficient at dealing with many different acronyms.
      One would not mistake a "frag order" for an "order to frag" someone.

      We also have MANY officers and enlisted troops who game.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    13. Re:Keeps track of points by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Military folks are proficient at dealing with many different acronyms.

      None of the different-but-similar abbreviations, discussed in your post are acronyms, so this would seem to be a non-sequitur.

    14. Re:Keeps track of points by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      "For the lazy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frag_(military)"

      You post a URL for lazy people and you don't hyperlink it? Know your audience, dude.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    15. Re:Keeps track of points by opposabledumbs · · Score: 1

      And obviously that article would be hosted by a South African media company.

    16. Re:Keeps track of points by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      frags, literally speaking, refer to killings of superior officers.

      I do believe sir, that you should use different terminology when marketing it to the military.

      Good point!

      Instead, we should call them High Energy Promotion Reassessments. Or HEPR for short. The military loves acronyms.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    17. Re:Keeps track of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When do they get Trophies/Achievements?

    18. Re:Keeps track of points by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      And it would be great if after five hits in a row it would growl "Impressive".

      Heh, my favorite one of those is the "holy shit!" after a near-flag capture =D.

    19. Re:Keeps track of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, albeit an antiquated definition. It's used most often by soldiers when referring to a fragmentation grenade (very few would recognize the term as anything but a shortening of the whole word), but nearly all junior officers, NCOs and enlisted would probably recognize it from video game terminology rather than its original meaning.

  12. Does it detect angle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it does it can do a lot of the math for the shooter.
    However even if it does detect the angle to a decent tolerance, I doubt this will replace the battery-less Angle Cosine Indicator http://www.snipertools.com/store/show/ACIMIL-A2

  13. But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Isn't that part of the Apple iWhatever Schtick? Showing it off in public? Instead of a "I am rich" application, a "I can waste you at 1000 yards" application?

    I'm not sure how the general public would react to your iPod Touch US Army M110 sniper rifle system, while you stand in line with it at your local Starbucks.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by rts008 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, for reliable sniping at 1000 yards you will want something ballistically superior to the 7.62x51 NATO (.308 Winchester) round/M110 package.
      The .308 Win. bullet transitions from supersonic to subsonic around 625-700 yards, causing the bullet to become unstable and seriously degrading accuracy to unacceptable levels for a sniper/target shooter.

      That's what the cartridge/rifle packages in the 7mm-8mm magnums (which includes the venerable .300 Winchester and Weatherby Magnums) are best suited for, which cover 1000 yards quite nicely. :-)

      Over 1500-1600 yards is the realm of the BMG .50 caliber/rifle packages.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    2. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Over 1500-1600 yards is the realm of the BMG .50 caliber/rifle packages.

      Like this guy did? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Furlong

      Actually, Carlos Hathcock (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Hathcock) hacked up an M2 BMG to do stuff like that.

      Imagine reading how to do that in "Make" magazine.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly like that! (impressive shot by any measure)

      And it was Hathcock's USMC armorer that modified a claw mount to attatch the scope to the M-2 HB BMG's reciever, not Carlos himself. This was a common practice until the .50 caliber sniper rifles became prevalent. (I was issued a 10x50 Unertl target scope in a claw mount for this very purpose)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    4. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by OcabJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, a .308 Winchester with the 175gr BTHP (Sierra Match King) bullet can still be supersonic at 1000 yards.

      With a muzzle velocity of at least 2650 feet per second, the Sierra MK 30cal 175gr bullet will make it out to and slightly beyond 1000 before it goes subsonic. It has a ballistic coefficient of .495-.505.

      The 175gr is the standard bullet used on the US military M118LR 'sniper' round. M118 being the military designator for the ammo, 'LR' meaning Long Range.

      You can even get a 22 caliber bullet in a .223 Remington (5.56 NATO) out to a 1000 yards maintaining supersonic flight. While many still use the .308 for 1000 yard Service Rifle competition, the AR15 platform in .223 has taken the Farr Trophy (US National Trophy for 1000 yard Service Rifle). This is accomplished by using an 80gr or heavier bullet. The Sierra Match King 22cal (.224") 80gr BTHP is popular, but the Very Low Drag bullets like the Berger 80gr VLD have a much higher ballistic coefficient and can buck the wind better.

    5. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by rts008 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks for the update.
      When I was in (US Army 1977-1980), we were restricted to either standard ball(used mostly for practice), and Lake City Match ammo(recommended). We could not use the Sierra Match King bullet(my personal favorite for the .308/.30-06) since it fell in the 'dum-dum' expanding projectile category.
      Also at that time there were no 5.56 NATO (.223) cartridge/rifle packages that could stay supersonic to 1000 yards.

      With the .223, the MEKR (Maximum Effective Killing Range) was 400 meters paired with the M-16.(the only weapon issued for this round at that time)

      The MEKR for the .308 was 800 meters in the M-24 and M-14, but extended to 1000 meters used in the M-60 SAW.

      The way it broke down for us:
      0-700 yards= .308 Win.
      600-1500 yards= .300 Win. Magnum (IIRC, a 180gr.BTSP-can't recall the MV)
      1400+ yards= clamp the Unertl to a M2 HB BMG

      Note: I was deliberately sticking to Mil-Spec/issue ammo/rifle combo's, but was aware of the possibility to handload non-Mil-Spec bullets to velocities to acheive 1000+ yard supersonic flight.

      I shot competitively in the 1970-early 1990's, also shot on the US Army rifle team, and handloaded my own civilian rounds for competition, fun, and sport.

      "...the AR15 platform in .223 has taken the Farr Trophy..."
      What rate of twist is used in this barrel?

      Again, thanks for the update. I had no idea I was this far out of date! Gotta go now, interesting research on this subject needs done ASAP! And yes, yes, lots of field trials. :-)

      *I think I hear my bank account sobbing*

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    6. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by Abraxis · · Score: 1

      Well, for reliable sniping at 1000 yards you will want something ballistically superior to the 7.62x51 NATO (.308 Winchester) round/M110 package.
      The .308 Win. bullet transitions from supersonic to subsonic around 625-700 yards, causing the bullet to become unstable and seriously degrading accuracy to unacceptable levels for a sniper/target shooter.

      That's what the cartridge/rifle packages in the 7mm-8mm magnums (which includes the venerable .300 Winchester and Weatherby Magnums) are best suited for, which cover 1000 yards quite nicely. :-)

      Over 1500-1600 yards is the realm of the BMG .50 caliber/rifle packages.

      Stop pretending you know what you are talking about...

      Try telling Palma shooters that .308 isn't reliable to 1000, they will get a good chuckle out of that. Further, my pet load, 175gr Sierra Match King + 44.5 grains of Varget is quite safely above transonic at 1k, thank you very much.

      Magnums have their place, I love my .300 RUM -- but a vast majority of the time I shoot my .308 --- half as much powder, cheaper bullets, cheaper brass, and I don't have to replace the barrel after 1000 rounds. Plus, if you can hack it at 1000 with the .308, with a Magnum it is easy mode (if you can ever call 1000 easy).

      And FYI, there are better rounds than the .50BMG for ELR precision shooting, assuming you aren't worried about damaging vehicles, buildings, armor, etc.

    7. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by Abraxis · · Score: 1

      When I was in (US Army 1977-1980), we were restricted to either standard ball(used mostly for practice), and Lake City Match ammo(recommended). We could not use the Sierra Match King bullet(my personal favorite for the .308/.30-06) since it fell in the 'dum-dum' expanding projectile category.

      rts008-- Just now saw your other reply quoted above.
      Sorry for the tone... I took you for one of those who watches a documentary about snipers or reads a Wikipedia article and then spouts information as if they are an expert.

      Obviously, things have changed a bit since 1980. The military changed its mind on the Hague-correctness of SMK in the mid-eights, IIRC.

    8. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      No pretending to it. Hell, I was shooting 1000 yard matches competitively in the 1970-1990 years, and know exactly what a .308 Win. can do.

      "Well, for reliable sniping at 1000 yards you will want something ballistically superior to the 7.62x51 NATO (.308 Winchester) round/M110 package. Ignore this part?

      Hint: I was sticking strictly to Mil-Spec issued weapons/rounds, not custom BR rifles/ammo*. You know...staying on topic of the iTouch rig for the M110/7.62x51 NATO.

      * Yes, Yes, I too loaded my personal .308 Win. with my developed handloads that enabled easy 1000+ yard shots. ("if you can ever call 1000 easy"- tricky, very tricky- my use of easy here means that the rifle/ammo was capable of sub 1/2 M.O.A. @ 1000+ yd. shots reliably)

      My favorite groundhog load was a 150gr. Nosler Ballistic tip ahead of 52gr. Hogden's H110 powder, CCI BR-2 primer, in W-W cases. A very hot load, but safe in my rifle, giving sub 1/4 M.O.A. accuracy day in and day out.

      Deer hunting, I stuck with Sierra 165 gr BTST Game Kings, pushed to 2600-2630 F.P.S. MV @ 10 ft., same primer, and whatever cases I culled from my target cases, or pick up here and there.

      But for 1000 yard matches(when I used a .308), I used the Sierra 168gr. BTHP, IMR-4350 powder (don't recall the charge, but it was VERY consistent @ 2910-2935 F.P.S. @ 10 ft. from the muzzle by my chronograph), same primer, and Lake City Match brass. 10 round groups with this load/rifle stayed under 13" @ 1000 yards if I did my part. It may have been capable of better accuracy with a better shooter, but that was my limit. :-)

      And FYI, I'm perfectly aware of that(.50 cal. BMG) also...see 'Hint:' above.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    9. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by x0 · · Score: 1
      --
      In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    10. Re:But can you flaunt it in public . . . ? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Well you can just get the software. i think it has several rifles that it supports. There is also another one that is $4.99 where you can make your own profiles for whatever rig you have.

      http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/external-ballistics-calculator-for-iphone-isnipe/

  14. 21st Century Williiam Tell courtesy of Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidence?

  15. It's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, a good use for Geotagging!

  16. Slashdotted by amclay · · Score: 0

    It seems as if the site has been taken by the Slashdot effect...

    --
    It's all fun and games till someone divides by 0. Then it's hilarious.
    1. Re:Slashdotted by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, I think that was just ESR making sure he gets his order in...

  17. Yay DRM by emag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now in the middle of a "situation", snipers will get a "you have already authorized this iPod on 5 sniper rifles" error...

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    1. Re:Yay DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I was envisioning a rickroll.

    2. Re:Yay DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      At least it's not running Windows Mobile.

      "It looks like you're trying to fire a round, would you like to...
      *Get help with "firing?"
      *Change crosswind and distance settings?
      *Read information about upgrading to Microsoft US Army M110 Sniper Rifle System Ultimate?
      *Fire now?"

      "Selecting "Fire now" requires Microsoft US Army M110 Sniper Rifle System Genuine Advantage verification. Please connect to the internet to complete this step before continuing."

    3. Re:Yay DRM by Lendrick · · Score: 2, Funny

      In response to this innovation by Apple, Microsoft will release the Zune Sniper Edition Basic and Zune Sniper Edition Ultimate. Both of these will come equipped with their exclusive ShootsForSure technology, which will prevent you from borrowing ammunition from other snipers.

    4. Re:Yay DRM by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      While you may not be able to borrow ammunition from other snipers, at least you can share it wirelessly (albeit spent rounds, but shared nonetheless)

    5. Re:Yay DRM by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      In response to this innovation by Apple, Microsoft will release the Zune Sniper Edition Basic and Zune Sniper Edition Ultimate.

      So all putsches/coups will take place on the 1st of Jan following a leap year? Nice, will add a recurring event to my Google Calendar!

    6. Re:Yay DRM by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      With automatic cease-fire on 31.12 in every leap year.

  18. Lighten up, Francis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Stop looking for things to be offended by.

  19. Which one is the accessory? by jep77 · · Score: 1

    Is the iPod an accessory for the rifle or is it the other way around?

    Wish I could read TFA... short of being able to see what the point is this is just stupid.

    1. Re:Which one is the accessory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the dealy-o is probably about the mount. I had a balistics calculator on my Palm III, years ago.

  20. Assassination FAIL!!! by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Your iPhone was rebooting!

    I can see it now, "Special Flops"... *lol*

  21. You got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw the video of your story here, but it's not like you told it. This Scotty guy seems to be about forty, not "just out of his teens". And it wasn't about him trying to fuck the donkey either, but the other way round.

  22. Ballistics calculator on a rifle by mr_mischief · · Score: 4, Informative

    This should help not just snipers but hunters and perhaps some day main force ground troops. At the listed link, the article's author states that the application software is available at the iTunes store. Contrary to some stories on the 'net, it is a general rifle ballistics application that allows someone to enter a different rifle and ammunition profile. So it's good for less specialized rifles, and not just the M110.

    The article didn't mention the availability of the mounting hardware. It attaches an iPod Touch mounted in an Otterbox protective case to a side-mounted picatinny rail. That seems much more handy in combat situations than digging an iPod out of one's pocket. This is what makes it not just another ballistics app for the iPod Touch and iPhone. Mounting it on the rifle could be a big deal in certain situations, and lots of rifles can be fitted with picatinny rails on the side.

    1. Re:Ballistics calculator on a rifle by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Well, if it really is any good, you might be able to read about a review about it in the near future here: http://www.snipercentral.com/

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Ballistics calculator on a rifle by SpuriousLogic · · Score: 1

      I totally saw the same use! I shoot service rifle matches in the Civilian Marksmanship Program, and this would be a dream to have for practice. I reload for competition, so the ability to create your own datasets is great. Uses for hunting are also fairly obvious, especially when used with a incline compensating range finder.

    3. Re:Ballistics calculator on a rifle by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      They should talk about the mounting hardware.

      I bought a cheap scope once to go on a pellet gun.
      The cheap scope fell apart from the vibrations.

      Could the iPod become "iParts" on the ground just from the recoil shocks?

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    4. Re:Ballistics calculator on a rifle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For main line troops a BORS is a much simpler and rugged solution.

    5. Re:Ballistics calculator on a rifle by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      It's not only much more rugged, but it's also much smaller and integrates well with top-mounted scopes without a need for a side rail. Thanks for the link.

    6. Re:Ballistics calculator on a rifle by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      The article didn't mention the availability of the mounting hardware. It attaches an iPod Touch mounted in an Otterbox protective case to a side-mounted picatinny rail. That seems much more handy in combat situations than digging an iPod out of one's pocket. This is what makes it not just another ballistics app for the iPod Touch and iPhone. Mounting it on the rifle could be a big deal in certain situations, and lots of rifles can be fitted with picatinny rails on the side.

      While I have a lot of respect for KAC, I'm not so sure that a rail-mounted iPod is such a great idea. Even though the user seeks to protect their rifle from damage, in reality stuff gets beat to shit. iPods, while admirably sturdy, just aren't ruggedized for that kind of environment, even in an Otterbox. I Am Not A Long Distance Shooter, but for ballistic applications it's pretty hard to beat something simple like this: http://www.opticsplanet.net/leupold-retractable-ballistic-chart.html The idea that someone is going to be mounting and dismounting an iPod from a number of different rifles is rather unlikely, and giving it ballistic data for the KAC PDW is simply ludicrous-it's a very short range defense weapon, not even remotely close to being a precision rig.

    7. Re:Ballistics calculator on a rifle by fitten · · Score: 1

      Hunting for the average hunter, no so much I'd imagine. Most hunters shouldn't be firing at targets past the MPBR of their rifle to begin with for ethical kills (much past that and you start getting into issues of hitting non-lethal areas), of course, that won't stop most from taking the shot anyway.

      Plus, you have to hope the game sits still (or at least the same range) long enough for you to get the range readings, interface with the program, adjust your scope, and take the shot. I don't know how long that will take... but it's a minor issue because if the game is grazing, it won't be moving too much from your range reading.

    8. Re:Ballistics calculator on a rifle by fitten · · Score: 1

      Good point. It's possible that the mounting hardware can mitigate that or that mounting hardware can be made that can mitigate it. I doubt Steve envisioned the iTouch/iPhone having to be rugged enough to survive many recoil shocks during its lifetime. I wonder if you can get it replaced at the AppleStore when it does and what kind of excuse you'd have to use to slip it past the 'Geniuses'. ;)

  23. On first glance at the title.. by LordByronStyrofoam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .. I thought it would be an article about sniping eBay bids at the last second from my iPod.

    --
    Slashdot's name? When my compiler sees /. it generates a warning about a badly formed comment.
    1. Re:On first glance at the title.. by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

      And I thought it was about sniping contact info from celebrities via BlueTooth.

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    2. Re:On first glance at the title.. by ElephantG · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it shouldn't be to hard to get eBay up on that iPod.

    3. Re:On first glance at the title.. by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

      Damn -- you beat me to this. +1!! :)

  24. Apple Military Equipment? by jason.sweet · · Score: 5, Funny

    So much for "Don't ask, don't tell."

    1. Re:Apple Military Equipment? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      And, of course, the infamous, "We could tell you, but then we'd have to kill you."

      (Okay, it's a NeXT joke, not an Apple joke...)

  25. yeah by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

    My eastern-european friends didn't like being sent cryptically named .wav files containing the Starcraft audio "WE REQUIRE MORE VESPENE GAS", either.

    1. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      En Taro Adun, Executor

  26. A light source on a sniper rifle? by jcr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems like it would be a problem w/r/t revealing the sniper's position.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  27. awesome, where can I buy one? by unix_geek_512 · · Score: 1

    This is awesome :)

    Where can I buy one?

    1. Re:awesome, where can I buy one? by xenolion · · Score: 0

      im with you.

  28. I hope this is just a proof of concept device... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if this is necessary I would think that the military already has a computing system that performs this function. If not, there are many reasons an iPod would not be the choice of device to use. It bleeds EM all over the place, doesn't use secure radio techniques. it isn't field durable. I really don't see the point other than to just prove a concept, which in reality may be all it needs to do.

  29. now last.fm by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    will have an online list of who is being targetted in real time.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  30. I guess it's time.... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  31. anyone who has ever taken a human life by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Troll

    doesn't crack jokes about it. unless they are a cretin or a sociopath, or have never actually taken a human life

    so if you found the headline funny, please self identify as moron or psychopath or ignorant, and go about the rest of your day, content in the fact that you know a little bit more about your personal failings

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well I guess that makes me a moron. no wait ignorant. no wait, moron! DAMNIT!

    2. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by agrounds · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd consider them blessed that they don't know how it feels afterward, or have the sleepless nights that come with it, or the hot ball of sour sickness that tightens in your gut every time you come under fire.

      They may be ignorant, but it is not a failing, just the naivete of youth and living a privileged existence even if it is in very bad taste. In a better world, no one would have to know what it is like.

    3. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Broken+scope · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are some exceedingly grim jobs in the military.

      Some folks never talk about it.
      Some folks talk about it.
      Some folks become very detached about what they do.
      Some folks develop a grim/dark sense of humor.

      Don't call someone a cretin or a sociopath because of their coping mechanism. It doesn't mean they enjoy it.

      --
      You mad
    4. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't crack jokes about it. unless they are a cretin or a sociopath, or have never actually taken a human life

      so if you found the headline funny, please self identify as moron or psychopath or ignorant, and go about the rest of your day, content in the fact that you know a little bit more about your personal failings

      Psychopath checking in!

    5. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by canuck08 · · Score: 1

      I agree.
      Soldiers and military contractors playing with (and joking about) new tech is perfectly reasonable.

      Internet weenies reveling in the idea of killing people like it is game on the other hand...
      ("haha! headshot!")

    6. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I agree.
      Soldiers and military contractors playing with (and joking about) new tech is perfectly reasonable.

      "Our studies indicate that this type of weapon is totally useless in warfare."
      "Well, it's not intended for use in your kind of warfare, Roy. It's the perfect peacetime weapon. That's why its secret."
      "So it's both immoral and unethical."
      "Yes."
      [Laughter all around]

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its amazing how many people lack a sense of humor.
      Does the title imply anything funny about taking a human life?

      For all you that have no sense of humor, let me spell it out for you. People would find the article title funny because of the application of a device that would be grouped closely with entertainment media in a field practicaly at the opposite spectrum.

      If you actually thought the joke was in having a new piece of hardware to take human life with, then you should identify yourself as a:

      moron or psychopath or ignorant, and go about the rest of your day, content in the fact that you know a little bit more about your personal failings

    8. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too soon?

    9. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is valid, but there is no need to put yourself on a moral pedestal when making a moral argument.

      I assumed the context of the author's angle for the phrasing was 'Unreal Tournament,' not actual military. To bring up personal points about the author from here, maybe get to know them first.

      In my experience, when other people joke about topics that are sensitive to me, I don't laugh but it also doesn't make me angry. I haven't been able to empathize with affronted sensitivities so I don't understand this problem.

    10. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      Not all lives have value, and while I have not zapped anyone I've met enough other vets who have to know that assertion is an expression of personal belief and not more. There is no reason to care about taking the life of an enemy unless you have been CONDITIONED by other humans to that reaction.

      One is of ones OWN society, so taking the life of an enemy thereof is the reverse of sociopathic! Even the Jihadist kamikaze bombers don't die for hate nearly as much as for religious/social affirmation.

      We are conditioned to behave as good Wal-Mart shoppers, but not all life is experienced in happy cheerful chain stores.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it's "internet weenies" assessing a new use of a familiar technology by the military using the only comparable frame of reference that they possess, computer games. It's the nature of our modern world that many people who are unable to or not willing to experience the brutality of war and conflict first-hand are put in situations where they can discuss it, even if it is using an abstracted interpretation of the concepts involved. Would you have them simply ignore the topic? Or would you force them to kill before they could discuss it?

      No matter, I'm sure you'll publish a complete and comprehensive assessment of the correct and proper manner in which all topics must be discussed in the future, such that we mere "internet weenies" are able to learn from your extensive, all-encompassing knowledge...or alternatively you could take your head out of your arse and stop being a condescending prick for 2 seconds and realise that perhaps people aren't "reveling in the idea of killing people" and that being offended by your own simplistic interpretations of others' words is perhaps not conducive to your continuing mental health...or lack thereof.

    12. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, there are exceedingly grim jobs in the military?

      How about... NOT DOING THEM? Dumbass.

    13. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please understand what a word means before using it.

      A sociopath is someone who meets the DSM 4 TR definition of a sociopath. A quick Google search finds that the DSM gives the following criteria:

      1. failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest

      2. deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure

      3. impulsivity or failure to plan ahead

      4. irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults

      5. reckless disregard for safety of self or others

      6. consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations

      7. lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

      -- NationMaster

      A sociopath experiences no guilt over what they've done. (Freudian Psychology explains sociopaths as lacking a superego)

      Developing a dark sense of humor is a perfectly healthy way to cope with being in a stressful situation. When people are forced to kill (or put in any stressful situation they will use coping mechanisms (see also ego defense mechanisms). Consider: a person who feels guilty about killing will try to make it less real for themselves by joking about it. This is frequently seen in soldiers.

    14. Re:anyone who has ever taken a human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some folks never talk about it.

      That's called Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

      Some folks become very detached about what they do.

      That's called sociopathy.

      Some folks develop a grim/dark sense of humor.

      Also very often associated with sociopathy and sadism.

      Don't call someone a cretin or a sociopath because of their coping mechanism.

      Just because you don't like the label doesn't mean the label doesn't apply. Plenty of sociopaths hate themselves and what they do. It's the fact that they've found coping mechanisms to bypass feelings of horror and remorse to allow them to continue their killing which makes them the sociopaths they are.

  32. Illumination? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because what every sniper needs is to have his face lit up when he's trying to remain hidden.

    1. Re:Illumination? by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you are close enough for the enemy to see your face, you need neither the sniper rifle, nor complex distance calculations.

    2. Re:Illumination? by mea37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends on context.

      Your target may not be the only person in the area hostile to you.

      You may not know all of their locations.

      You would probably prefer that none of them know your location.

    3. Re:Illumination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      turn down the brightness... surround the screen with camo/ghillie... stop fearing better technology... if you ignore it it will probably kick your ass one day...

    4. Re:Illumination? by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You make the mistake of assuming there's only one enemy out there. Usually it's best to assume there's more than one, y'know...

    5. Re:Illumination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be used just fine during the day time I think.

    6. Re:Illumination? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      They don't have to actually see your face; they simply need to see the small glow suddenly coming from that field. Since snipers like to use good cover (including darkness where feasible) to protect their positions, carrying what is essentially a flashlight around pointed at yourself won't be good.

    7. Re:Illumination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because what every sniper needs is to have his face lit up when he's trying to remain hidden.

      Yeah, as much as he needs another hole in his head!

    8. Re:Illumination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are close enough for the enemy to see your face, you need neither the sniper rifle, nor complex distance calculations.

      Suppose for a moment that enemy has own snipers searching for you (which is what they always do, among other targets like officers, radio operators, other specialists...) ... they would be able to see your face, just like you would be able to see theirs.

    9. Re:Illumination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like an idiot with a Hollywood-romanticized view of the field.

  33. Rockbox by rlp · · Score: 1

    You can install Rockbox on the Ipod but then you need the gun mounting for the BFG-9000.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  34. Yeah, this is going to be cheap. by dreemernj · · Score: 3, Funny

    But they are charging an arm and a leg for the wifi seeking missiles they are selling to our enemies.

    --
    1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
  35. Don't run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't run from the Spice Girls mix, you'll only die tired!

  36. Oh no.... by Ollabelle · · Score: 1

    This just in: the Dept of Defense has categorized the iPod Touch as munitions and therefore cannot be exported without a DoD license.

    --
    Ibid.
  37. What? by no-body · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Are you playing too many video games mixing up reality with fiction?

    What kind of reality do you have stored in your brain - playing music as result of destroying another human - howsoever you are trying to justify it?

    Yes - this is a flame!

    I can't believe this kind of crap is going on on /. - maybe it's time to move on or start filtering...
    Yucc!

    1. Re:What? by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Are you playing too many video games that require you to check your sense of humor at the door?

    2. Re:What? by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

      You can reapply for a sense of humor at anytime. You obviously haven't played any video games in a while and fail to understand the intricacies of making light of something. Nobody on the site actually wants to go out and kill people (except for perhaps those Ubuntu supporters against MS engineers). They are turning something serious into humor and ignoring the reality. It is what /. do best. Since most don't own a real gun or have a real girlfriend, let them joke a little.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody please call a wah-mbulance for this guy.

      Seriously, taking another's life is horrible. During times of war, not as much so, but still unfortunate that we haven't been able to grow beyond this as a civilization. Can you honestly blame us for having such little sensitivity to war time killing when we see dead, mutilated bodies all over our papers and on the television? We cannot escape it, we must do something. Humor is always a great way to overcome.

    4. Re:What? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      By all means, cry crocodile tears for the fallen. But just by virtue of being here and participating in the use of the internet you realize you are helping kill more people than any sniper ever could? The internet uses a huge amount of power and a huge amount was involved in creating all the hardware it runs on today. Most of that power comes from coal and most of the world's mercury contamination (as well as more nuclear contamination every year than from all the nuclear bombings, testings, and accidents combined) comes from burning coal. That mercury is making its way into our bodies through every imaginable vector including our air and water, and of course, the food that lives in it. I bet you make jokes about the internet, but the fact is, it is killing people every day. Perhaps you should come down off of your ivory tower and make the realization that you have no moral high ground.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. Why? by camperdave · · Score: 0

    Why would you want to mount an ipod onto a rifle? I would think this is would be a distraction to the soldier rather than a help. Instead of keeping an eye out for a target, they'll be watching the screen.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Why? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      Well you have two options.

      Look at the ipod or fumble around with the range pad with all the numbers you calculated beforehand.

      --
      You mad
    2. Re:Why? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Look at the ipod or fumble around with the range pad with all the numbers you calculated beforehand.

      Sorry, you'll have to be a bit more informative. The closest I've ever gotten to combat is paintball, and as far as I know all rifles have a simple "point and click" interface.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Why? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Eventually you have to do the equivalent of clicking with a larger offset of pixels to get the mouse to click where you want it to compared to where it is pointing.

    4. Re:Why? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Eventually you have to do the equivalent of clicking with a larger offset of pixels to get the mouse to click where you want it to compared to where it is pointing.

      So the ipod is acting like a viewscreen? You look at it instead of looking through the sights? Why mount it to the weapon instead of the helmet, then? I'd rather stick just the weapon out from cover rather than the weapon plus my head.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Why? by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

      On a real rifle you have to change the settings on the sight to compensate for the effects of wind and range. Bullets follow an arced path, not a straight line like in games. Also, wind has a large and noticeable effect. These calculations are usually precomputed and printed out but this means that you end up having to fudge the numbers a bit because your table only has rough range and windage estimates. This item will compute the proper sight settings to be applied when you enter in the wind speed and direction and the range to the target.

      --
      In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When using a proper sniper at long ranges, a lot of things will affect how the bullet will travel. At some extreme distances you even have to take the curvature of the earth and how far you are from equator into account to hit your target.

    7. Re:Why? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      These calculations are usually precomputed and printed out but this means that you end up having to fudge the numbers a bit because your table only has rough range and windage estimates. This item will compute the proper sight settings to be applied when you enter in the wind speed and direction and the range to the target.

      I thought all that stuff was already built into the scope. Isn't that what all the knobs and such are for?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Why? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      The software tells you how much and which direction to turn each knob.

  39. Re:A light source on a sniper rifle? by faloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I doubt it'd be used much in the field, at least not without some heavy modification to the iPod. I can't imagine it's resilient enough to meat mil-spec standards off-the-shelf. Once it's out there, I'd bet the spotter uses it more to get rapid numbers to feed to the shooter than the shooter uses it. The spotter can keep it mostly concealed and hide the light.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  40. M-M-M-MONSTER KILL! by Hottie+Parms · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is just the beginning. Next thing we know, we'll be seeing WMDs with Apple logos on them. I see it now: the iBomb (tm)

    1. Re:M-M-M-MONSTER KILL! by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      But that's against the Apple EULA

      http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/03/itunes_eula_pro.html

    2. Re:M-M-M-MONSTER KILL! by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      They already had that -- it was called the Cube.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
  41. Legitimate, if disturbing to some by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Computing ballistics in the field has been an ongoing issue for long-range shooters, as determining the required elevation & windage settings for precision shots depends heavily on a variety of factors (wind speed, temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, bullet weight, ballistic coefficient, barrel length, powder burn rate, barrel twist, target angle, distance, and even latitude & direction). Until recently, sharpshooters/snipers addressed the problem by computing ballistics tables ahead of time, memorizing or taking paper copies into the field, developing a reliable "gut feel", and even using specialized slide rules (ex.: Mil-Dot Master); only recently have portable computers been adapted or built (Palm Pilot, Barrett BORS) to improve situational accuracy. Bringing the iPod Touch into the picture via a convenient mounting system allows tremendous improvement & flexibility in creating applications to solve ballistics problems, as there are already at least 3 apps available, and both professionals & hobbists can easily develop their own apps. That this mounting system is provided by Knights Armament, a well-respected name in high-quality small arms, helps as well.

    Those with snide remarks should be aware that (A) this is legitimately needed by military and police to keep your life safe and comfortable, and (B) long-range target shooting is a legitimate and popular sport.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      I can understand the need for such technology and even how it will help. What I don't understand is the choice of device, if cost is really a factor then a COTS HTC Touch or something similar would be far cheaper, if you were dealing with large enough volumes you could problem mount/design a standard Windows Mobile ARM 9 kit inside your own shell (cutting down weight and giving you exactly what you need).

      This is a interesting modification of a consumer device but part of me feels that there would be better and cheaper solutions which wouldn't leave you subject to Apple's DRM'd iPhone. To my knowledge the iPhone only allows web applications, are they really that much easier to program for when compared to the Symbian/Windows Mobile/Embedded Linux platforms?

    2. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by thethibs · · Score: 1

      They probably did the wise thing: Find the best software and then buy the hardware that runs it.

      There's really good ballistics software for the Palm, so I'd guess the IPod app is superlative.

      --
      I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
    3. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Those with snide remarks should be aware that (A) this is legitimately needed by military and police to keep your life safe and comfortable

      Based on what assumptions? That a military with efficient snipers is required to keep me safe and comfortable? That a police force with efficient snipers is required for the same?

      Do you really mean to suggest that we live in such a dangerous world that the *only* way to ensure general public safety is by using anonymous-kill-at-a-distance tools, that without improving the efficiency of these killing machines I'm in mortal danger?

      I'm a pretty hard cynic, but you've got me beat by far. Seems to me that if violence is your primary answer for how to maintain general safety, you're fighting a losing battle.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      Those with snide remarks should be aware that (A) this is legitimately needed by military and police to keep your life safe and comfortable, and (B) long-range target shooting is a legitimate and popular sport.

      I can prove you're wrong on point A. My government's military does not possess advanced weaponry like this, and nor does my government's police force. Yet, my life is safe and comfortable.

      Now if I may add some input of my own: the comfort and safety of American lives is not dependent on advanced weaponry, but rather intelligence and education, science, non-corrupt leadership, the separation of church and state, and the constitution.

      Weapon makers will do what they do. But please don't try to use the average world citizen as an excuse.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    5. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should be aware that (A) this is legitimately needed by military and police

      military yes. law enforcement, no.

      the longest range a US-based police sniper has taken a shot at is something on the order of 88 yards. you don't need a dope card for 88 yards, much less a field-failure-prone battery powered ballistics calculator. whether .223 (5.56mm) or .308 (7.62mm), at 88 yards it's pretty much point and shoot.

    6. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      The only reason this is even news is that Apple/ipod is involved. Ballistics calculators have been available for other PDAs for quite a while now, and of course specialized devices (likely based on the ARM 9 kits you mention) also exist.

      I think the iphone actually has some sort of native code support, but in this case it's the ipod and I'm not sure about that. In any case, I can't see how it could be sigificantly easier than writing C# in Visual Studio. I went from zero VS and C# (and for that matter C++) experience to writing useful apps in an evening or two. The benefits of not having Apple suddenly decide to wash their hands off of blood money also apply.

    7. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't care where you live, you are wrong if you think your police force does not use long range rifles for certain situations

    8. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by radtea · · Score: 1

      Those with snide remarks should be aware that (A) this is legitimately needed by military and police to keep your life safe and comfortable, and (B) long-range target shooting is a legitimate and popular sport.

      The snide remarks seem to me to be more directed at the juveniles who want to make light of killing other human beings. Killing takes something away from you, and the little losers making the jokes about this device are so far removed from that reality that they can't even see the importance of the harm to the victim, much less the killer.

      That said, as others have pointed out it is hardly clear that the effectiveness of long-range snipers in the military is in any way related to the health and comfort of the civilian population. A large standing army of the kind the US currently has is historically a danger to the health and comfort of the civilian population. Read a little history and you'll learn that.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    9. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      Do you really mean to suggest that we live in such a dangerous world that the *only* way to ensure general public safety is by using anonymous-kill-at-a-distance tools, that without improving the efficiency of these killing machines I'm in mortal danger?

      Sadly the fact is we DO live in a dangerous world, at least it is some of the time. On at least some occasions properly used "anonymous-kill-at-a-distance tools" is the best or only way to ensure the general public safety and the lack of them does in fact put people in danger. Humans are capable of some truly horrible behavior and sometimes the threat or actual use of violence is the only thing that will deter... or end... such behavior.

      It is legitimate to argue about the appropriateness of using such violence in particular situations: whether we should enter this or that war, whether the violent or deadly response by police was appropriate in this or that particular situation. Fearing that authorities will use deadly force inappropriately is legitimate. But, you are way outside the mainstream if you think there is NEVER a situation where the use of deadly force is appropriate action or you think such situations are so vanishingly rare that being prepared for them is somehow immoral in itself.

      I suspect that the only reason you could be so naive as to think the world is NOT that dangerous is that you DO live in a society where there are armed people willing to kill on your behalf.

    10. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to end someone else's horrible behavior is of course horrible behavior from his/her perspective. Snipers are usually terrorists, except in their most common use-- law enforcement. And while cops might be ready to kill on my behalf, they are also ready to kill me on my behalf too.

    11. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      The catch is, this is something much more useful to civilian/recreational shooters than law enforcement or military. Despite what some training programs may focus on, for the most part LE snipers are engaging at no more than one or two hundred yards. And I just don't see a serious military use for an iPod.

      But on the civilian side, we've got a product that's potentially quite useful..except that it comes pre-loaded with utterly useless profiles. There's a tiny, vanishingly small number of SR-25s in private hands, and precisely zero KAC PDWs. And the SR16 with a 14.5" bbl is an SBR, which again means virtually no one owns one. KAC would be much better off if they included profiles of the more popular .223/.308/.300WM/.338LM/.50BMG loading and barrel lengths.

    12. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Black September.

    13. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (B) long-range target shooting is a legitimate and popular sport.

      Is there a point the sport anymore if you let the computer do the work?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    14. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by indiechild · · Score: 1

      It runs on either the iPod touch or iPhone, so it's not as expensive as you think.

      Also, iPod touch/iPhone runs native applications (acquired via the online App Store), not just web applications.

      As for easier to program, not sure. Apple uses Objective-C for the iPod touch/iPhone platform.

    15. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by indiechild · · Score: 1

      I'm sure your military and police forces do employ sniper rifles. Unless you don't have a military or police force, which would be quite exceptional.

      And I would argue that your safety and comfort depends on all of these things: intelligence, education, leadership, social justice, as well as the ability to defend yourself and others with lethal means.

    16. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I can understand the need for such technology and even how it will help. What I don't understand is the choice of device, if cost is really a factor then a COTS HTC Touch or something similar would be far cheaper, if you were dealing with large enough volumes you could problem mount/design a standard Windows Mobile ARM 9 kit inside your own shell (cutting down weight and giving you exactly what you need).

      This is a interesting modification of a consumer device but part of me feels that there would be better and cheaper solutions which wouldn't leave you subject to Apple's DRM'd iPhone. To my knowledge the iPhone only allows web applications, are they really that much easier to program for when compared to the Symbian/Windows Mobile/Embedded Linux platforms?

      Your knowledge on the iPhone was correct up to June of 2008, when the second-gen iPhones and iPod Touches were released with native programs, not just web apps. First-gen models have an upgrade to give them this ability too.

      That said, it's peculiar that they designed a mounting system for a consumer device, rather than a dedicated module, but I suppose this isn't for actual military use, and it must be a lot cheaper for them to go this route--precisely because iPod Touches and iPhones are shipping in huge volumes, and they're all exactly the same shape+size making a one-size-fits-all mounting possible.

      One thing I haven't seen mentioned... does this software use the accelerometers in the iPhone/iPod Touch at all? Is there any benefit to measuring recoil, like comparing it against the profile for that weapon/ammo and offering suggestions to improve distance, etc?

    17. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by Abraxis · · Score: 1

      +1000

    18. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by d20_techie · · Score: 0

      Given the device's other capabilities I would think a long range WiFi "sonar" could be used to pick up the location. Unless modified the touch will automatically respond, not necessarily connect, to an available access point.

    19. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Even in "Airplane" mode?

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    20. Re:Legitimate, if disturbing to some by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      Trying to end someone else's horrible behavior is of course horrible behavior from his/her perspective.

      So? By the time we get a situation where deadly force is justified we don't give a damn about his/her perspective... or perhaps we only care that it is soon from the ground looking up and growing dim. There is an objective moral order, which your own opinions about using deadly force are derived from but which you have overrefined to to the point of being self-defeating. At some point violating the that moral order places you outside it's protection. Nobody *should* give a damn about the perspective of the murder on a killing spree. Shooting someone in the head is morally wrong. Shooting someone in the head to prevent them from doing the same to an innocent third party isn't. In the case of governmental authority FAILING to prevent them when you could is itself morally wrong. That is really the main (and arguably ONLY) point of having a social structure as burdensome and dangerous as government exist in the first place, as the collective expression of our individual human right to self-defense. In crass terms the main (whole?) point of government is to shoot the guy trying to harm you (me, whoever) in the head

      while cops might be ready to kill on my behalf, they are also ready to kill me on my behalf too.

      No, they're ready to kill you on MY behalf. Again (in legitimate cases) by the time they're willing to kill you on my behalf nobody gives a damn about you anymore, nor should they. With your gun to my head, knife at my throat, or hand on the detonator I hope they are equipped with the most efficient "anonymous-kill-at-a-distance tools" available. I also hope they are unsullied by a moral sense so highly refined as to let you squeeze that trigger, pull that blade across my throat or push that button because in their philosophical musings they realize that from your perspective them stopping you would be "horrible". I might prefer that they find the necessity deeply sad and troubling, but in that moment I'd prefer the callous jerk who doesn't hesitate when he has the shot and laughs about it later to the sensitive, morally correct soul who hesitates and fails to protect my life because taking yours is so heart breaking. In the action that ultimately matters most the insensitive jerk who acted is morally superior to the sensitive soul that failed.

  42. headshot by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

    "Boom HeadShot!"

  43. Oh why not?! Everyone else is doing it! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    "Reach out and hit someone!"

    (This works with iPhone too right?)

  44. NEDM? by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to improve this as a creative idea. NEDM.

  45. HO NOES by hachete · · Score: 1

    we killed the website. More deadly than a rattle-snake ... slashdot

    --
    Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
  46. No. I found it objectionable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Am I the only one who found this attempt at humor disturbing and objectionable? "

    I also found this attempt disturbing; if you try to be funny, you need to kill with the joke, or it's pointless. The guy who called it a killer app? Funny stuff, and that's the level of quality that we expect, especially those of us who pay to access /.

  47. Re:A light source on a sniper rifle? by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that it would probably need to be quite rugged to withstand recoil.

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  48. Calibration by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you calibrate its accuracy like a touchscreen and a stylus? Except with live human heads?

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:Calibration by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily live human heads... zombie heads work fine in a pinch. Mind the blood splatter.

      --
      -
  49. Like in the movie "Vantage Point" by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    One of the "terrists" in the movie aimed and fired an automated rifle mounted in a window using some sort of PDA. I'll have to re-watch now to see which it was.

    1. Re:Like in the movie "Vantage Point" by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Which has also been done previously in "Shooter" and before that in "The Jackal" both of which were much better movies.

  50. the enemys can use appstore, too. by digi2k · · Score: 1

    use the iphones camera to upload intel via 3g to the base to confirm target identities, maybe even upload gps data. whats the pin to pair with my bluetooth sniper rifle again?

  51. du - du - du - another bites the dust, yeah..... by goffster · · Score: 1

    perhaps snippet just short enough to fall under RIAA radar screen

  52. Mall Ninjas of the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mall Ninjas are now dancing with glee. One more tacticool toy to bolt onto the side of their EBR's .

    Groan.

  53. One drawback... by rotteneffekt · · Score: 1

    the screen backlight seems a bit counterproductive... "You've been fragged by.."

  54. Re:I hope this is just a proof of concept device.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe not the US military but I'm sure many of the poorer militaries around the world could use something like this. not to mention hunters everywhere, the majority of whom aren't wealthy.

  55. Apple Branding Standards and Practices by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But I thought Apple was more protective of its branding to an extent of not allowing its computers to be depicted in movies as killing people for example. This application is available from the iTunes store for $11.99; I would have thought Apple would refuse to carry it and they'd have to use hacked devices to run it.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Apple Branding Standards and Practices by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that Apples can only be used to kill aliens.

    2. Re:Apple Branding Standards and Practices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metal Gear Solid 4 had a massive amount of Apple advertisement(in game iPod and all the computers were Macs and OS X was even show if you took notice to the monitors.)

    3. Re:Apple Branding Standards and Practices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But an Apple can kill Aliens in ID4

    4. Re:Apple Branding Standards and Practices by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Troll

      Steve Jobs has got a lot nastier since the cancer came back. Now they sell an aimer application for white phosphorus shells localized into Hebrew on AppStore.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  56. TF2 Taunts by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

    Now if only it would say, "Thanks for standing still, wanker."

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  57. While behind enemy lines, by ilikejam · · Score: 1

    please remember to put your iPhone on silent. Thank you.

    --
    C-x C-s C-x k
  58. Some potential uses by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 3, Informative

    So obviously there are some pretty funny comments on this, and some incredulous "why?" or "won't this give away a snipers position?" posts as well.

    To address the latter:
    As most of the /. community can appreciate, projectile ballistics isn't as simple as a game; The hardest I've seen in a game is "move the crosshair around to simulate breathing" Obviously, its more difficult than this, or *everyone* at war would be sitting back at 1200 meters, sniping from safety.

    When you get into precision shooting, you need to take into account so many factors, it boggles the mind. Muzzle velocity, wind (and wind isn't constant at the point of your muzzle and where the target is, humidity, bullet mass and aerodynamics, barrel twist rate, etc. This ballistics computer helps you input that data, and will spit out how you need to adjust your crosshair to account for all this stuff.

    A system like this would also make it easy to log past shot data, which is very important for precision shooters.

    I've seen wrist-watch ballistics computers as well; beats the crap out of charts.

    As for when it would be used:
    In training.
    In competitions.
    By police snipers in some situations (where, perhaps, concealment isn't important, but getting that first cold-barrel shot exactly on target is.)
    By a sniper's spotter, perhaps.

    disclaimer: despite my username, I'm not military, nor am I a precision shooter; i've merely had experience shooting as a major hobby.

    --
    -- My Sig is a P228.
    1. Re:Some potential uses by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I can't help thinking of the major flaw of the Norden bombsight, not knowing the winds and weather conditions in the area between the aircraft and target. It could drop a bomb in a pickle barrel under ideal conditions, which rarely existed in the real world.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  59. But what does it do... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    If you get a no scope?

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  60. Re:I hope this is just a proof of concept device.. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    maybe not the US military but I'm sure many of the poorer militaries around the world could use something like this. not to mention hunters everywhere, the majority of whom aren't wealthy.

    And maybe some non-governmental enemy combatants?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  61. Re:on the contrary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your concern trolling somewhere else, douchebag.

  62. It's a tossup for me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... between the Unreal Tournament "HEADSHOT!" and the Fallout 3 "ka-ching" sound (when you fire a mini-nuke).

  63. Re:on the contrary by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    No, no such admission has been made. That someone may make light of, e.g., a new technology that could be used to support sniper operations, does not make that person a sociopath. You are simply and patently incorrect.

  64. Re:A light source on a sniper rifle? by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Informative

    Depends on the round they're using, and the rifle's setup/weight. A heavy rifle chambered in something smaller (like the 6.8 Remington SPC for example, which has been gaining some favor with the military brass, though it likely doesn't have quite the range for sniper duty) with a muzzle brake can be pretty light recoiling. Certainly light enough that it wouldn't damage anything that used solid state storage.

    Problem is that the muzzle brake tends to make a rifle insanely loud. What the sniper gains in reduced recoil probably wouldn't be worth it.

    If you use something like 5.56 NATO though (which is the standard infantry round - not normally used for military sniper applications but it's commercial equivalent the .223 Winchester was what was used by the DC snipers several years back), then it's light enough that you wouldn't even need a brake to reduce the recoil.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  65. Re:on the contrary by AioKits · · Score: 5, Informative

    Coping mechanisms aren't formed when someone does a 'wrong' action, merely a stressful one. How many people in high stress jobs have a drinking or drug problem as their coping mechanism?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coping_skill

    In a normal circumstances I will probably not be exposed to a situation where I will have to kill someone. However, if I'm the victim of a mugging gone bad and I have to kill him or he will kill me, believe that's what will happen. There is no sense of right or wrong, merely that I must survive. It will probably be stressful afterwards, and I will probably adapt dark humor to avoid thinking about it.

    And thank you for showing you have no concept of how military chain of command and subordination works.

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  66. EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the EULA for iTunes have a clause in it that says you can't use it for "the development, design, manufacture or production of missiles, or nuclear, chemical or biological weapons." or something like (exactly) that?

    Assuming the iPod is under an identical or less restrictive license, it'd be fine to use it for the calibration and/or targeting of such weapons, right?

  67. DOMINATING by cheftw · · Score: 1

    Forgive me for being cynical, but have they just engineered a widget that ties something to something else, both of which happen to be cool? Either that's not news or I'm in the wrong business.

    --
    Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
  68. top of the line equipment handles elevation, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The newest equipment has sensors for air pressure, humidity, temperature, range finder, wind speed and direction.

    Punch in 1 of the 100+ loads you might use, then sight on the target, squeeze lightly on the trigger.

    The box adjusts elevation and horizontal clicks, re-sight on the target, fire.

  69. Re:on the contrary by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

    If I took a man's life that had a knife to my child's neck, that would not be wrong to me.
    However, I may have a hard time coping with it, and there are different paths I could take.

      The easiest path may very well be to joke about how I took that bastard out, especially when dealing with others, who feel just that way and that he was a bastard. Consider that I have an uncle, who half of his family disowned, because he didn't kill his daughter's rapist.

      Also, if I stick a gun to your head, you just might be able to pull an erection to gay midget porn, that doesn't mean you would like it... or would you learn to like it?

    --
    Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
  70. Adds new meaning... by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    This really ads new meaning to the term "kill switch."

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  71. ok, let's explore this line of thought by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    to make light of death and gallows humor is perfectly acceptable, its a mechanism for catharsis. works of fiction, or natural deaths, these come to mind

    but what of real life killing equipment?

    how's that funny again?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:ok, let's explore this line of thought by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      What's funny is your indignation. I'm cracking up.

      I admit you might consider me a sociopath. I don't believe I owe anybody anything, including basic respect for their right to continue living.

  72. pure pwnage by slyn · · Score: 0, Troll

    BOOM HEADSHOT!!

  73. War is Hell by jamrock · · Score: 1

    "You don't know the horrible aspects of war. I've been through two wars and I know. I've seen cities and homes in ashes. I've seen thousands of men lying on the ground, their dead faces looking up at the skies. I tell you, war is Hell!" -- General William Tecumseh Sherman, address to the graduating class of the Michigan Military Academy, 1879.

    No wonder you posted anonymously; that is the single most tasteless "joke" I've ever seen here, and that's saying a lot. War is easy to joke about for those who've never seen blood and brains spilled in actuality, or experienced the stench of a battlefield.

  74. say i have a daughter by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Troll

    and some guy kills her

    in the courtroom, i stand up, and with the gun i snuck in, i blow the guy away

    if, for the rest of my life, i am haunted and tortured by what i did, i'm not a sociopath

    if i enjoyed it, i'm a sociopath

    your visceral reaction to taking a life is completely different from your higher mental faculties. your higher mental faculties might reason that it is necessary for you to take another human life in the name of justice. but in doing the act of taking another human life, as commanded by your forebrain, your emotional reaction will vary from horror to revulsion to strange excitement. you will find utter revulsion, or enjoyment, in what you are compulsed to do by your allegiance to a sense of justice. which reveals your honest natural predilection, regardless of the context of the life taking

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  75. You call THAT a Sniper rifle? by geekmux · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm the only one here who has a hard time believing that a slightly-better-than-standard-grade AR setup with a 20" barrel is considered a "sniper rifle".

    Snipers with real hardware based on a Remington bolt action capable of "ragged-hole" MOA would probably be able to actually utilize this tech.

    Mounted on MOA hardware, configured in what many would consider a poodle-shooter caliber, is a toy or marketing gimmick. You choose. At least it does pave the way for COTS hardware and fast development.

    1. Re:You call THAT a Sniper rifle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You do realize the M110 is an AR-10 based rifle shooting 7.62 NATO with sub-MOA precision, right?

    2. Re:You call THAT a Sniper rifle? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      You do realize the M110 is an AR-10 based rifle shooting 7.62 NATO with sub-MOA precision, right?

      I stand corrected on the caliber, however, I still beg to differ on it's inherent accuracy out to the claimed 800 - 1000m mark. The velocity and accuracy difference between an 20" barrel mounted to an AR platform and a 26" barrel embedded in a bolt-action platform are worlds apart beyond 800m.

  76. lets explore your reasoning further by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you are forced to take another human life due to circumstances where your life is threatened

    perfectly acceptable

    however, during the taking of another human's life, you will find a number of emotional reactions to the event in different people

    some will be revulsed and horrified and tormented by what they have done, even though all of society and their own sense of reason and higher faculties completely condones the act as necessary

    then another person might find themselves playing the event out inside their mind again and again, and find excitement, titillation, enjoyment even

    this person is a sociopath

    it is their natural honest emotional reaction to the taking of another human life

    that their natural predilection was revealed in a perfectly socially acceptable situation has absolutely no bearing on their inherent nature

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:lets explore your reasoning further by prelelat · · Score: 1

      Yes I would agree if someone plays it back in their head and enjoys it, it makes them a sociopath. What the other posters have been trying to point out, at least I think, is that when your put into that situation what your expressing on the outside isn't nessisarily what your expressing on the inside. You joke about it to try and make yourself think it's not a big deal but on the inside it could be eating away at you.

      You could think that the only way to get by is to drink or be an ass. Maybe you do it because you don't want people to like you for it because you don't like yourself. Your reading way 2 dimensionally into the human phyche. Making jokes or comments doesn't nessisarily mean your a sociopath it could mean they are dealing with some heavy shit as well. Though some of the comments on here make me think that some people are twits for the sick jokes they have come up with.

      I didn't find the headline funny, and I think most of the people here that did probably fit your profile but I wouldn't be suprised to find someone who has done those things and is trying to cope with it outwardly tries to find it funny.

      like I said:
      A) to make them selves think it's excepble
      B) They want people to think they are a jerk because they feel like one
      C) They know not what it means
      D) They are sociopaths(might be the same as C)

    2. Re:lets explore your reasoning further by thegnu · · Score: 1

      C) They know not what it means
      D) They are sociopaths(might be the same as C)

      In my experience, a sociopath doesn't care that they don't know. They would rather continue exploiting their lack of empathy than learn to not hurt other people.

      One is uneducated. The other is unwilling to be educated, or ignoring of the truth, or ignorant.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  77. Re:I hope this is just a proof of concept device.. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    An iPod touch is a completely solid-state device last I heard. You can turn the WiFi off, and it should be mostly silent except for the light. Toss it in a waterproof case, and you have a fairly robust device, it's a device that many troops already have, and it's cheap as hell as compared to many other specialized pieces of equipment. I'd rather our military not spend more money than they have to... they're already pissing lots of money away tilting at windmills set up by the now previous administration.

  78. Re:A light source on a sniper rifle? by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    Problem is that the muzzle brake tends to make a rifle insanely loud.

    Tell me about it. I have hearing loss in both ears from muzzle blast.

    I agree on the 5.56 not having that much recoil. I have not fired a sniper rifle. Most look heavy enough to soak up a lot of energy. I don't know how the .30-06 compares to the 7.62 NATO, but I do know about the '06 recoil, with the scope cut to prove it (eye relief mean never having to say "#&$*@!!!"). I just don't like the idea of electronics on a rifle.

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  79. you may be joking by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    but i am going to suppose for the moment you are being perfectly honest

    in which case, i applaud your honesty for admitting a brutal truth about yourself

    it is completely possible to be a moral psychopath. and what i mean by that is, you realize what and who you are, you get excited from inflicting pain, and your higher faculties works against your inherent nature to keep yourself from committing horrible acts

    such a psychopath is actually a preferable person to someone who refuses to explore or accept their essential nature, psychopath or not

    ugly honesty is always preferable to pleasant lies, but many people refuse to admit that there are dark corners of their mind. and when such corners remain unexplored, such a person has a potential to go out of control, and inflict real damage to themselves or others

    willful blindness is never preferable to a cold reckoning of your darker self, and in such brutal honesty with yourself, you develop a sense of control over your darker side such that you don't bite yourself in the ass by losing control in certain situations

    as a corollary, lets suppose for a moment you are a pedophile. you find yourself sexually excited by little boys. person A is horrified by these impulses, denies them, never admits them, runs away from them when they rear themselves. what happens to such a person? they wind up buggering a child in a moment of weakness and loss of control

    meanwhile person B depressingly accepts these impulses, learns to recognize their appearance, explores them in their mind, and develops mechanisms for mollifying them and shortcircuiting them, going up to and including reporting oneself to others to prevent oneself to harming a child. a moral pedophile

    everyone has a dark side. acceptance of it leads to an ability to control it and prevent it from hurting yourself or others. those who deny their darkside and never explore it, are in danger of succumbing to it and losing control and committing vile acts

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  80. Ummmm, this is the equivalent to smoking on the... by t-maxx+cowboy · · Score: 1

    So is it just me or does this seem to be the equivalent of smoking on the battle field? You know like from in the movies, a soldier lights up a cigarette giving away their position and likely getting shot in the process. Now instead you get your rifle mounted iPod to shine it's back lighting on your face / body to do the same. Seems this wasn't quite thought through.

    Cool rifle accessory though.

    --
    Regards,

    Ryan Pritchard
    Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies
  81. Re:on the contrary by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "by simply admitting they need a coping mechanism, you are making a tacit admission of the wrongness of what they are doing. you don't need a coping mechanism to cope with a neutral experience or a good experience"

    Don't forget that "right" and "wrong" are not more than matters of social conditioning which is dictated by current social fashion.

    We are taught one set of rules for being good little Wal-Mart shoppers, then find out that those are just absurd in other situations. Part of the lies we are told about how we should behave is that they are more than a convenience for maintaining social order. Some understanding of the utility of situational rule sets would be useful.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  82. theme song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

    It doesn't need a theme song, just a short sample. "America, FUCK YEAH!"

  83. Re:on the contrary by Immostlyharmless · · Score: 1

    I can tell you that, on the whole, doctors and nurses have VERY morbid senses of humor and deal with death, disease and dying every single day. I certainly hope that you aren't suggesting we are all sociopaths?

  84. Re:Ummmm, this is the equivalent to smoking on the by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

    Plenty of tools the military uses can not be used in the same capacity at night. Even normal rifle sights are pretty difficult to use at night.

    --
    In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
  85. Slashdot: War News For Morons +1, Incendiary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever."

    Particularly if it was a head shot of the moron who wrote the above statement. This moron is obviously ignorant of how much of U.S. federal tax dollars support the U.S.A military-industrial-Congressional complex. '

    Yours In Socialism,
    Kilgore Trout.

    1. Re:Slashdot: War News For Morons +1, Incendiary by otis+wildflower · · Score: 0, Troll

      Fag.

  86. Now I know... by DerPeser · · Score: 1

    ...what the comment "Military tested" on my iPhone protective sheet meant ^^

  87. Wasnt there some MIL-STD norm? by drolli · · Score: 1

    I always was under the impression that the drop-height should be around 80cm onto concrete floor, without damage. Good luck in performing the tests with "rugged ipods" and re-certifying them. Also i would imagine that a certain degree of maintainability would be required. And checking humidity/temperature/dirt/continuous/vibration stability will also be necessary. The qusetion "how many of these fail after being enclosed in the freight space of an transport plane, beein cooled down, left for a day in +70 degrees in the inside of an box in the sun, dropped when unpacking" is a question which should be answered.

    We will see if "cutting the costs" by "of the shelf HW (and SW)", which was not designed to make such certifications easy will be cheap after upgrading it with these certifications.

    1. Re:Wasnt there some MIL-STD norm? by sixide · · Score: 1

      I don't see an ipod of any sort passing military standards. It's great that you can use a pair of COTS parts to make ballistics calculations easier, but this will never pass the test.

    2. Re:Wasnt there some MIL-STD norm? by drolli · · Score: 1

      Uhm yes, that was my point.

      And i think it is a fucking idea to ship people areound half the world wit unspecified accessories. You dont know when they fail. And maybe you cant even reproduce the error.

  88. Re:on the contrary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a high stress job, but I don't have a problem with drinking or doing drugs.
    In fact, I find it quite enjoyable.

    Captcha: Generals

  89. MIL-STD-810 by drolli · · Score: 1

    ok google is you friend

  90. Possible sounds by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1
  91. The real question by Chicken_Kickers · · Score: 1

    The real question: is Apple okay with the use of its iPod for the purpose of killing people? I guess this won't go down too well with the Apple crowd. On the other hand, Microsoft could benefit from this. "Hi, I'm a Mac, and I kill people". (Not saying Microsoft doesn't kill people, albeit not on purpose).

    1. Re:The real question by dwye · · Score: 1

      > Not saying Microsoft doesn't kill people, albeit not on purpose

      There are warships based around Windows CE. The question is, in those situations, is MS killing the targets, or the ship's crew, with more effectiveness.

    2. Re:The real question by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Not saying Microsoft doesn't kill people, albeit not on purpose

      Microsoft doesn't not kill people on purpose?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  92. No wireless by Trillan · · Score: 1

    No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. La---

    *thwick!*

  93. Assault Weapons Ban? by DustoneGT · · Score: 1

    Will they ban the manufacture and import of the iPod Touch along with all the other semi-automatic 'assault weapons'?

  94. score one for honesty by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    score two for completely supporting my argument

    thanks for both

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:score one for honesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      score two for completely supporting my argument

      thanks for both

      Bottle that smug and sell it.

      You'll be rich.

  95. Is this really... by gustar · · Score: 1

    the sort of thing with which Apple would their products associated? I mean, aside from the immature, dolts in the slashdot crowd who think boring out someone's skull with a 50 cal is cool there has got to be a lot of folks who are going to frown upon their favorite consumer electronics product being used to facilitate taking human life.

  96. Ballistic software for mobile devices not new by OcabJ · · Score: 1

    Ballistic calculators for mobile devices isn't new. Exbal has been around for Palm and Windows Mobile devices for several years now. The only interesting thing is that this application was approved by the iTunes Application Store. I guess people are surprised Apple would allow a firearms/shooting related application on the App Store.

    I think ballistic calculators on mobile devices is a gimmick anyway. I just use JBM to generate a ballistic table for a specific gun/ammo that I use in competition, make a hard copy, and keep that with the gun (some people even print it out on a small card and tape it to their stock).

  97. Nobody is normal by LateArthurDent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if i enjoyed it, i'm a sociopath

    Your problem is that you're holding on to outdated views of that some people are "normal" and others are not. Psychology has done away with that a long time ago. Nobody is "normal".

    Now we only consider something to be a disorder if it interferes with the normal life of the person in question. It doesn't matter if a soldier is ecstatic after killing others in battle, as long as he never has the need to "get that feeling again" and starts considering killing people he's not supposed to. That would be interfering with his normal life, and he would be a psychopath.

    On the other hand, if a soldier gets excited and a sense of adventure in battle, but is completely normal in order circumstances while another is completely distraught at having killed and has nightmares every day since, the person with a disorder is the one that is distraught (its interfering with his life). The one who got excited and giddy and has now adapted just fine to his life after service is perfectly healthy.

  98. This has been around for ages by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    This has been around for ages. It's common ballistic calculator software, but for the iPod. There are multiple similar software packages for Windows Mobile/CE as well as desktop applications dating all the way back to DOS.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  99. Interesting timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering who just got sworn in... ... I am just saying... not condoning or anything. Just seems like interesting timing.

  100. the first and only time for a disambiguating ! tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the first and only time for a disambiguating ! tag and it's missing

    Sniping Could Be The Next Killer iPod App

    should be tagged !ebay dammit

  101. Re:A light source on a sniper rifle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 for making me google w/r/t

  102. ...isn't it all moving to in-scope overlays? by swb · · Score: 1

    I largely assumed that this was the trend -- integrate a laser ranegfinder, upload your ballistic info or use the canned data in the scope, and you get digital data overlay in-scope. It can't be all that long that we get the all-digital scope where the image is entirely digital and not an overlay on an optical image.

    I personally think that if they were going to mount something this big on the rifle to use as a ballistics calculator, a GPS with an integrated rangefinder would make much more sense. The GPS could provide elevation deltas between the shooter and the target, barometric pressure, wind speed, and so forth, not to mention being kind of handing for directions..

    Anyway, I thought Real Snipers (TM) could do mil-dot calculations in their head.

    1. Re:...isn't it all moving to in-scope overlays? by stridebird · · Score: 1

      Of your enthusiastic list of GPS functionality:
      - elevation deltas : NO
      - barometric pressure : NO
      - wind speed : NO
      - handing[sic] for directions : NO

      however:
      - calculation of [G]eographic [P]osition: YES

    2. Re:...isn't it all moving to in-scope overlays? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The military specifies and delivers custom optics packages. It makes by far the most sense to integrate this functionality into the optics package. Add some controls someplace you can access them without shifting your grip on the weapon (they could be stick-on for all I care) and either HUD or dashboard the data right inside the scope, like they did with the apparently-now-scrapped-due-to-cost OICW program. (It could be cost-effective when applied only to snipers, as opposed to the entire armed farces.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:...isn't it all moving to in-scope overlays? by swb · · Score: 1

      I was mostly assuming a custom device. Hand held wind speed devices have existed for years. Mounting/integrating one on a GPS would be easy, as would a laser range finder.

      Mine has an altimeter to indicate elevation, separate from GPS derived elevations (which it will also use/display). That means you could derive barometric pressure.

      If you had a GPS unit with a laser range finder, you could easily calculate the elevation delta between your location and the spot X yards away using internal map data or some kind of trigonometry based on the angle of the path to the target.

      And sorry about the typo, but a GPS is handy for directions, and my PN-40 will display color sat imagery or other custom raster maps, which might make more sense.

  103. Re:A light source on a sniper rifle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The big problem with "mil-spec" is that it is often cheaper and easier to buy a bunch of off the shelf COTS equipment. These will be "deployed" by soldiers who by it themselves anyway. The procurement process in the DOD is so long that the ipod touch will be old and useless before they get it fielded.

  104. Buggy... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

    I have an iphone, fairly happy with it, but I have to say as often as apps randomly crash (mail app crashed 3 times today while typing an email), I wouldn't want to trust my life to it...

    WAYYY too much excess crap on that thing in my opinion. Now if they created a custom OS and just used the iPhone/Ipod touch hardware, they might be on to something.

  105. Would it last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The recoil from a .30 caliber round is pretty hard, even with a muzzle brake. Even with a soft mount, how many shots would a consumer-grade phone survive? It's nice to have a ballistics table handy, but a printed page works just as well and won't break after you shoot!

  106. This is the problem with the appstore. by MasterOfDisaster · · Score: 1

    You can't bundle software with accessories (hardware or software for another platform).

    I'd be pretty pissed if I bought this fancy iPhone balistics calculator clip thing, got it home and found I had to pay ANOTHER $12 to get the software for it.

    I'm sure we'll see more and more accessories like this - A rifle can't be the only thing that's more useful if you clip a specialized calculator or some data entry on it. And while the iPhone/iPod touch probably isn't even the best off the shelf device to use for this type of application, the iPhone still the cool gadget and will get you headlines if you do something weird like this with it.

    --
    The opinions in this post are ficticious. Any similarity to actual opinions, real or imagined, is purely coincidental.
  107. May I suggest a theme song? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hellmarch, from the Red Alert games ;)

  108. No.. this is an anti-concealment device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when the enemy is hiding behind a wall, blocking your headshot, you can call him. The poor reception will force him to stand, presenting a perfect target.

  109. accelerometers by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

    When I saw the thing attached to the rifle, the first thing that went through my head was someone was using the accelerometers in there to automatically calculate the distance that the bullet would hit at when shot from the current angle. Given a known load, this should be child's play. You could have a real-time display of how far away your zero is based on where you're pointing the rifle at the moment. When I read the article and found out that it's simply a ballistics program, and the fact that the device is attached to the rifle is irrelevant, I was no longer interested. Really, a ballistics program isn't big news. A way to attach it to the rifle isn't big news, or even particularly useful, necessarily. Actually making good use of the device that's attached to the rifle, *that* would be interesting news.

  110. Theme Song? by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

    How about "Boom, Headshot!". ;)

    Edit: Lameness filter? Wow, talk about fucking dumb. "Boom, Headshot" is supposed to be in all caps. 'Cause, you know, it *is* meant to denote yelling. :rolleyes:

  111. A bit late, but some first had experience by s2jcpete · · Score: 1

    I worked for a bit in europe as a sniper with the M24. We used calculators attached to our sleeves to calculate distance vs Mil reticle adjustments. It seems like this might be of use, but the bright screen would be a deal breaker in my opinion. Smoking at night looked like a flare, so a bright ass LCD wouldn't be helpful.

  112. I just can't stop myself by skudenfaugen · · Score: 1

    Should I? No really, should I? *fights with self* Geotagging? ... yup definitely going to hell.

  113. samples by deckardt · · Score: 1

    *loads iPod with Wolfenstein 3d samples* -MEIN LEBEN!-

  114. casual American sociopathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

    Just wow. And Americans wonder why they're hated abroad...

  115. samzenpus == idiot by Doctor+O · · Score: 0

    If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever.

    This must be among the most ignorant and stupid things I've EVER read in a summary.

    My dear friend samzenpus, you are cordially invited to join a sniper into war territory and witness some of your beloved head shots in real life. Hint: No, you're never going to forget that sound of a head exploding and brain splatting against a wall. Yes, you'll dream of it for the rest of your life.

    You know, a friend of mine was in Kosovo as a sniper for the UN troops back in the 90's. Seeing what that war did with him rid me of most of my "war humor".

    --
    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  116. Re:A light source on a sniper rifle? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I doubt it'd be used much in the field, at least not without some heavy modification to the iPod. I can't imagine it's resilient enough to meat mil-spec standards off-the-shelf.

    Milspec is all but over. We had more civilian-grade GPS devices in the hands of soldiers in the gulf than military-rated units and for the most part they performed.

    Milspec will stick around for things upon which your life depends on a firefight, that sort of thing, but the military is using ever more hardware without such ratings.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  117. Violence Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always take killing seriously. But the art of violence management is to kill killers to prevent killing. At some point, rapists, torturers, conspirators, supporters and even thieves may merit killing. Take enough money or rights or sanity from people, and you ruin their lives, causing poor health, starvation or suicide. You can save lives by killing, if you know what you're doing, and you don't make mistakes. That's why we have police and soldiers. Make a mistake, and you're just another killer everyone else wants to kill.

    Always take it seriously.

  118. Do you often cause offence to yourself? by Xest · · Score: 1

    ...who said anything about headshotting humans? It could just as well be the head of an animal or even a cardboard target.

    It sounds like you made an assumption and took offence at that assumption.

  119. Perfect sniper shot by Dareth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For sniping regular run of the mill soldiers, the perfect sniping shot is thru both butt cheeks.

    Requires 1-2 soldiers to carry guy off the field, and to provide more targets perhaps.
    Requires medical care from limited medical staff like surgeons to remove the clothing,etc pushed into the wound.
    Soldier will not be returning to the field anytime soon.

    Best shot for depletion of enemy resources.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Perfect sniper shot by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      First, I'm going to echo the GP - this is a very crass topic.

      Second, isn't shooting to maim against the Geneva conventions?

  120. Re:A light source on a sniper rifle? by awtbfb · · Score: 1

    Correct. I remember a project to replace military truck dashboards with LCD panels. The critical flaw was that, at least for night driving, this would light up the driver's head. Obviously, this is not a desirable situation.

  121. Death of a Human! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ~!Positronic brain malfunction!~ #Unpreventable First Law violation pondered by this unit#

  122. They're Charging A Lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're charging a lot of money for a PDA app that is essentially a table lookup of established ballistics data. Nice idea for practice shooting but I doubt it would be practical in a real situation.

  123. Militaristic mindset by musth · · Score: 1

    "If it automatically played a theme song after every head shot, this would be the coolest rifle accessory ever."

    What an asinine editorial comment which betrays this blog's slavish devotion to the cause of violence in video toys. The military and sniper rifles are all part of the big fragfest, right?

  124. wait by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    How much processing power is needed for these sort of calculations? Couldn't they write their own TI-89 program that would end up being cheaper and better suited to the military's needs?

  125. ... and ... by danieltdp · · Score: 1

    ... get modded funny. That's impressive!

    --
    -- dnl