Slashdot Mirror


UK Can't Read Its Own ID Cards

An anonymous reader writes "Despite the introduction of ID cards last November, it has emerged that Britain has no readers that are able to read the cards' microchips, which contain the person's fingerprints and other biometric information. With cops and border guards unable to use the cards to check a person's identity, critics are calling the £4.7bn scheme 'farcical' and a 'waste of time.'"

205 comments

  1. No readers? No surprise! by IBBoard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I won't go as far as being paranoid about "it was always the governments plan and they just want the data on everyone", it doesn't surprise me that our government isn't even capable of introducing both halves of an ID scheme at the same time.

    Until they fix it they've basically just introduced an over-expensive photo ID. Well done, Labour!

    1. Re:No readers? No surprise! by segedunum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I won't go as far as being paranoid about "it was always the governments plan and they just want the data on everyone", it doesn't surprise me that our government isn't even capable of introducing both halves of an ID scheme at the same time.

      I'm even more cynical than that. While the government will probably get some data on people, judging from other such projects that have gone before it will be extremely poorly coordinated and it will be a far bigger security risk than anything else because they won't be able to keep a lid on the data. It just strikes me that a lot of companies have got cosy with the government, promising them things that are almost certainly not going to work in order to fleece them of billions of pounds. Billions of borrowed pounds in the current climate, that is.

    2. Re:No readers? No surprise! by RegularFry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm more convinced by "it was always the government's plan and they just wanted to dole out juicy contracts to the private sector."

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    3. Re:No readers? No surprise! by Zumbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that it's more a question of whipping up fear in the population and then reap the popularity by appearing to "do something" to keep the population safe (and docile?). In any case, the fact that the ID cards can't be read, pretty clearly suggests that the "increased safety" argument were a load of horse manure.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    4. Re:No readers? No surprise! by evilkasper · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Planning and Implementation ; glad to see it's not just us Yanks that have issues with it. ~Cheers

    5. Re:No readers? No surprise! by zeldorf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's actually worse than that, because they are so rare no one really knows what they look like!

      On two seperate occaisions I've seen someone trying to use national ID cards as proof of age when buying alcohol. Both times they were refused because the staff didn't recognise the card.

      The whole thing is a total waste of time and (our) money, all with the goal of filling a void that does not exist!

    6. Re:No readers? No surprise! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you stopped your sentence too soon, should finish with "for kickbacks, contributions and favors"

    7. Re:No readers? No surprise! by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1
      The part that confuses me (and I admit to not be any kind of an expert on this) but, how the hell can they write the data to a card, if they are not able to read it to begin with? One would think that the hardware interface would be the same, whether it is a physical reader, or something like RFID, so that should not be an

      issue.

      The scary part, if they cannot read the data at all, how the hell do they know for 100% sure, that would be MY data on the card, instead of say, Joseph Stalin?

      --
      I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
    8. Re:No readers? No surprise! by ivucica · · Score: 1

      Now imagine stuff like that happening in country like Croatia, of which many people didn't even hear. I can name several examples:

      * cards replacing paper booklets in medical care cca 10 years ago ... and for several years most doctors didn't have the equipment for reading the data required for treating patients

      * introduction of "e-index" three years ago, for grades of university students, unifying old "X-card" (used for tracking food subventions in student cantines) , and old paper booklet "index"... of course, it is immeasurably more difficult to read the grades from e-index, requires a .Net 3.0 application, and besides, there's an online system we can log into to show grades to prospective employers

      Also, we can count in introduction of "OIB", person identification number, also known as tax number. Basic difference to JMBG (unique citizen's identification number)?

      * OIB is shorter (13->11 digits)

      * OIB doesn't contain any data about person
      (random numbers + 1 checksum digit)

      And why? To satisfy European union.

      I find it quite absurd that a shorter number is considered more secure. And we're spending hundreds millions on the project which includes delivering of OIBs in paper form to every single citizen in the country.

      Why?!

    9. Re:No readers? No surprise! by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      (in the UK) sadly, it's no surprise that when someone retires as an MP, they nearly always end up becoming a director on the board of the very large consultancies which used to be their customers. we have the best government that big corporates can buy!

    10. Re:No readers? No surprise! by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      This is largely true in the U.S. as well, but tell me, what do you expect deal makers to do once they retire from public life?

      I imagine that making horrible decisions and managing not to get tarred and feathered is, in fact, a great line item for the ole C.V. come 'retirement' time.

    11. Re:No readers? No surprise! by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      Interesting.. So if the staff had been provided a reader they would have trusted any halfway legit looking card provided it read properly?

      Sounds like it.

    12. Re:No readers? No surprise! by giantweevil · · Score: 1

      Because if it were Joseph Stalin, the card would be reading them.

      --
      Disregard the above.
    13. Re:No readers? No surprise! by swjenner · · Score: 1

      UK ID cards should more accurately be called UK Obiturary Cards, since they contain biographical information about the death of the people of the UK and like newspaper obituaries they are compiled in advance.

    14. Re:No readers? No surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather recommend the chinese embassy. They're not only capable of reading all our chips, but will also immediately offer ten cheap copies for the price of one original.

    15. Re:No readers? No surprise! by zeldorf · · Score: 1

      I was merely pointing out that they don't even work on the most basic level as it is, and because of that are totally useless. I've never ever seen anything telling me what a national ID card looks like, so why would they expect anyone to believe one?

      If they had a reader then, yes, they would trust it because 'the machine said so'. They would also have been trained to use the reader, and would know what the cards should look like.

      Please note, I don't think they're a good idea and certainly don't want one! My drivers licence has always worked for me, and everyone else I know without a drivers license uses their passport/student ID/prettymuch anything if they need to.

  2. privacy by justhatched · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is a security measure

    1. Re:privacy by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      except everybody BUT the gov't can read them...

      it's funny, but sad-funny.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:privacy by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean job security for the police. If they put the criminal element out of business with an ID program that works, then the government would need fewer police. With a half-ass ID program, both police and the criminal elements can breath easier.

    3. Re:privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, secure as a chocolate fire truck.

      At least no one will every be able to copy them hey?

      ALONG WITH THE OLYMPICS, AND PARLEMENT (as its only for show now)...THIS IS ONE BIG EXCUSE TO WASTE OUR MONEY - TERRORISM we already had that with IRA

      PS anybody want to buy an identity, my friend will sell you one and say his dog ate it.

    4. Re:privacy by Llanfairpwllgwyngyll · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's like "plug and play" - that worked 50% too. As in, "plug" always worked, it was just the "play" bit that had problems...

    5. Re:privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one of those built-in features.
      Yep! the UK can't read their own data.
      Perhaps, they need to ask the other side for help!
      Where are those hackers, counterfeiters, and Ruskies?
      We need a universal keygen license to see our stuff....

    6. Re:privacy by Hyppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How exactly does "an ID program that works" eliminate all crime?

    7. Re:privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought those chips were DRM free!

    8. Re:privacy by Rigrig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Simple: you implement RFC 3514 on the passports.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    9. Re:privacy by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Assuming that the criminal has an legitimate ID, the police can check whether there are any outstanding warrants. That will separate the wannabe criminals from the professional criminals. :P

    10. Re:privacy by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      well, any current ID program "works". it does what it's built to do, except in the UK where it doesn't. what creimer means it probably "works perfectly". and with such a system, how could they ever fail? i mean, the criminals won't have them. if they did, the system wouldn't work perfectly. everyone who's innocent will have such an ID all the time, or the system couldn't work perfectly.
      and if there isn't such a clear distinction between good and evil, it just simply can't solve anything.

      see what i did thar? political commentary, booyah ;)

    11. Re:privacy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Simple: you have everyone's DNA, fingerprints and eye scans on a database. You make sure every square inch of the country is watched by CCTV. You tie in CCTV with automatic facial recognition, speed cameras with numberplate recognition (already done) etc.

      Crime will become impossible to get away with. Unfortunately, people will still commit crimes, so eventually the entire country will have to be turned into a giant prison.

      Well, maybe not that last part.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:privacy by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      very, very small values of "eliminate"?

    13. Re:privacy by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      How exactly does "an ID program that works" eliminate all crime?

      Slightly paranoid tinfoil hatty answer... You can ID everybody who says that there is crime, throw them in jail, and then just declare victory over crime. Everybody thinks you accomplished something and then you get re-elected and keep your cushy job ruining democracy.

    14. Re:privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just look for the word "Criminal" in the "Career" field.

    15. Re:privacy by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Not on-topic for the article, but definitely on-topic for parent:

      You know, I'm wondering how long it will be before that is actually implemented, in Windows, at least. Microsoft already offers different "levels" to signed and unsigned code. How long until unsigned code can only send marked packets; then how long until ISPs begin dropping these?

      That said, I'll put in my two cents about the ID cards... I don't remember where I read this, but here's a quote from a prominent government official regarding their inability to read the cards: "We're really taking the security of your personal data very seriously with this new program. Our inability to read that data from these new ID cards proves that. We're the government; if we don't have the technology available to read it, nobody does!"

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    16. Re:privacy by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, people will still commit crimes, so eventually the entire country will have to be turned into a giant prison. ...

      Australia?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    17. Re:privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you can just put all the people whose ID reads: "Occupation: Criminal" in jail.

      (This joke is actually more thought though then the current British system).

  3. Look at Belgium by houghi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stop making fun at Belgium and follow in their food steps. The readers are available and the source is open Dutch: http://eid.belgium.be/nl/Achtergrondinfo/De_eID_technisch/
    Main thing is that you see there are Linux drivers for it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Look at Belgium by u38cg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or alternatively, we could spend the money on something useful, like giving every child a pony.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      omgponies!

    3. Re:Look at Belgium by Nick+Fel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mmmm... food steps.

    4. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm... food steps.

      Belgian chocolate ... mmm ....coated Brussel spouts!? WTF!?!

    5. Re:Look at Belgium by AlXtreme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stop making fun at Belgium and follow in their food steps.

      *puts mayonnaise on his fries*

      Joking aside, it seems like the Belgians have done this right: You need a code to access the information from the passport, similar to your bank/creditcard. Not perfect, but at least it isn't readable by everyone.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    6. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop making fun at Belgium and follow in their food steps.

      So, eat 'frites' then?

    7. Re:Look at Belgium by michaeldot · · Score: 3, Funny

      Microchipped pony.

    8. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or alternatively, we could spend the money on something useful

      UK could help them.

    9. Re:Look at Belgium by digitig · · Score: 1

      So, eat 'frites' then?

      Happily -- but mayo on them?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    10. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or there are a few foreign embassies that have specialised signals units - to reprogram the card to anything you want.
      Picture of the dog, and its paw print. Priceless!

    11. Re:Look at Belgium by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      Stop making fun at Belgium and follow in their food steps.

      How will eating lots of mussels help?

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    12. Re:Look at Belgium by Goffee71 · · Score: 5, Funny

      and when the credit crunch really bites, pony sausages and a nice warm coat

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    13. Re:Look at Belgium by blaine+the+monorail · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interestingly, the first year the new ID cards were issued in Belgium, there was also a shortage of readers in police departments. If you had a new ID card, you were required to keep a printout of the data with you in case the police requested your ID :-) (it wasn't that bad though; the only information on the chip that isn't also on the front of the card, is your address)
      The police have enough readers now, so it's not necessary anymore.

    14. Re:Look at Belgium by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      as a belgian, i can assure you that it's very tasty, if you got the proper mayo ^^.
      ours usually also contains a bit of lemon, and that gives it a nice taste, abroad i oftenonly see plain mayo i wouldn't eat with my fries either :p

    15. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm... tasty tasty food steps

    16. Re:Look at Belgium by rHBa · · Score: 5, Funny

      We could call it the OPPC project

    17. Re:Look at Belgium by skerit · · Score: 1

      Most non-Belgians don't understand why you would put mayonnaise on your fries because mayonnaise in other countries are mostly void of taste.

    18. Re:Look at Belgium by sortius_nod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, not everyone, just the people with the desire to get the code... which won't be hard.

    19. Re:Look at Belgium by berend+botje · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm Dutch and we also put copious amounts of mayo on our fries. And even though "we" are in friendly rivalry with those wacky Belgians (well, the Flemish anyway) I will readily admit that the Belgians have the upper hand on us with regards to fries. And mayo, and certainly beer. Oh, and waffles. And chocolate.

      Although I can't imagine how drunk they must have been to invent 'tartarsauce' for on their fries... :-)

    20. Re:Look at Belgium by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Stop making fun at Belgium and follow in their food steps.

      Yeah, I'm craving Belgian Waffles now!

    21. Re:Look at Belgium by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      ..with GPS, in case it get lost.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:Look at Belgium by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Here in Germany everybody uses mayo...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    23. Re:Look at Belgium by MooUK · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Delicious sausages.

    24. Re:Look at Belgium by digitig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe, but we were talking about eating it.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    25. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here in america we just slap in an unencoded RFID chip readable by anyone driving by. They tell us this makes us safer and more secure.

    26. Re:Look at Belgium by ukbazza · · Score: 1

      As a UK person, I went to Belgium recently as a mayo-sceptic, but came back a convert. It really is good, even more so when washed down with quality beer.

    27. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or piccalilli.
      Last year at Akademy (KDE conference) in Belgium, I visited a frites shop with about fifty different sauces.

    28. Re:Look at Belgium by sukotto · · Score: 1

      Where you have to buy two, to get one, which you don't actually get. :-D

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    29. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh come on... make it expensive... give every child a unicorn

    30. Re:Look at Belgium by berend+botje · · Score: 1

      I like piccalilly.

      So do the Brits, they like it so much they named a square in their capital to it. Piccalilly Circus is one of the most visited tourist spots in London!

    31. Re:Look at Belgium by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      Stop making fun at Belgium and follow in their food steps.

      *puts mayonnaise on his fries*

      Joking about what? Sounds like you didn't use good mayonnaise.

    32. Re:Look at Belgium by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The Dutch have sweet mayonnaise (which honestly tastes slightly disgusting) and the Belgians have standard mayonnaise (which you can get here in the US too). Belgium has a lot of sauces though. Tartar sauce is also available in the US and it tastes similar. What I wonder is who ever invented 'American' Sauce (it looks bad, it's slightly hot and you can only eat a little bit because it's way too heavy - similar to garbage plate 'beef sauce' but more solid like mayonnaise).

      The more north you go anywhere (Americas, Europe, Asia) the worse the food starts tasting (in general). In the south you have the spicy hotness and while you go up you pass through culinary gems like New Orleans, Italy and Belgium. Where it is cold (The Netherlands, North America and Canada) it seems like the foods and drinks get more watery (eg. Budweiser) although far north they do know how to brew some really strong drinks (to stay warm?).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    33. Re:Look at Belgium by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      One Paedophile Per Child project?! The Daily Mail was right!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:Look at Belgium by e-Flex · · Score: 1

      Have we been bored to death on this topic or what? Instead of being paranoid and refitting our tin-foil hats, we are talking about food and cultural differences! Although it might be sad that we are becoming numb.

    35. Re:Look at Belgium by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      omgPWNies!

      There, fixed that for ya.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    36. Re:Look at Belgium by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It does. If I can't read your RFID, I know your a terrorist and kill you on sight.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    37. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are 'food steps' the reason why everyone in Europe is so obese now?

  4. Where exactly are these cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The cards dont exist yet and wont until 2011 or 2012.

    Still, dont let truth get in the way of a good rant.

    1. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its partly true, part headline grabbing. Some foreigners have been issued with cards, more as a trial than anything else, and readers outside this trial havn't been bought yet.

      Not much of a story really.

    2. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA: "The first UK ID cards have already been issued - but no UK police officers or border guards have any way of reading the data stored on them.". They are already issuing them to asylum seekers, people freed from Gitmo, etc.

      Maybe thats the plan - just say "sorry, just wait over there until we can read your card. You should be allowed into the UK sometime soon".

    3. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by u38cg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you can get one if you want one, and certain classes of people have to have them - asylum seekers, airport workers, and a few other categories. Perhaps gypsies and jews should be added to the list, *sigh*.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    4. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Archtech · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the first ID cards were issued last year (2008).

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    5. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe they will then make the cards yellow so they stand out. Then perhaps the cards could be shaped into a stylish star that they can put on their clothes.

      Hmmm.

    6. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not just asylum seekers, anyone here on a settlement visa. My wife's got to have a card now, even though she's here fully legitimately and I'm a full-fledged British citizen andsubject of HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second. And students are next in line, which as a PhD researcher means yours truly. If you refuse? Well, you lose your visa or your student status as appropriate. They're targetting those that are least able to object in order to build up an "installed base".

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Nomen+Publicus · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting to see what happens with the aircraft workers who already are subject to MORE stringent checks than the ID card would require. Every relevant union has already come out and rejected the introduction of additional pointless ID cards.

    8. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by u38cg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you know the funny thing though? My girlfriend is Brazilian, and she resides in the UK through her father having dual Portuguese/Brazilian nationality. By European law, she can't be required to have an ID card (and no-one seems to have asked, either) and unless she goes for UK citizenship, never will. This amuses me especially because both Portugal and Brazil do have mandatory ID cards.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    9. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I should correct myself here, it's only overseas students which are affected right now. So I'm not in line quite yet.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    10. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Informative

      For a troll with a supposed interest in history you don't seem to get that "limey" is an insult you'd use against an Englishman, and that England is a subset of Britain, not the whole. So you manage to fail basic trolling, basic geography, basic social history, and by implication would fail basic politics. That's an astounding failure rate for someone who takes so much time out of his day for lofty proclaimations and trolling on Slashdot. You'd think that you'd pick some of the basics up by osmosis if nothing else.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    11. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      Trouble is with this government it's more likely that pro-Palestinians will be targeted, as criticism of Israel will soon be against the national interest once Mandie has completed his putsch.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    12. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by hattig · · Score: 1

      Well the entire point of ID cards is to replace well developed and evolved systems (the current stringent checks, for example) that utilise actual intelligence and due process with a dumb swipe-and-see system that is simpler.

      I assume this is because intelligence is getting rare as a result of educational policies.

      See also: Criminal Databases, Speed Cameras, etc.

    13. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by houghi · · Score: 1

      In Belgium they did it the other way around. First the a testcase in one smaller village. Then to all Belgians and only later to foreigners. The reader can be used to fill out your taxes online among other things. There are plugins for different browsers so that people can use the card instead of filling out their address on a website (e.g. for delivery)

      All places and stores where you would expect to give your details, you can use a reader and enter it directly into your own system instead of typing it in.

      But then everybody had to have an ID card on him/her from the age of 12 anyway. So adaptation and acceptation is pretty easy. And all is open source, so you know what is in there.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Uh, Limey was slang for British sailors. There's no special "Englishness" about it.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    15. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's dishonest, it's underhanded, it's New Labour.

    16. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife's got to have a card now, even though she's here fully legitimately and I'm a full-fledged British citizen

      EU citizens in the UK and their spouses (their nationality doesn't matter) are exempt from the ID card requirements. Freedom of movement rules do not allow national ID restrictions that are not also compulsory for UK citizens.

    17. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Except that the government strategy document was leaked some time ago. It says that disadvantaged groups like EU citizens working in the UK and children (Students) were to be bullied into accepting the ID cards so that when the time came to chip the population their resistance will have been broken down. Disgusting really, George Orwell would be proud of them.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    18. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not surprised you are posting anonymously. The UK is begining to have the reek of Stalinism about it. You sir are comitting a thought crime and will shortly need to be re-educated by the stuffed toy (Golliwog) hating BBC.
       

  5. Dad's Army by BBadhedgehog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is anyone really surprised? There are people out there who still don't believe that Dad's Army was an early example of reality TV. Government competence levels have not improved in the ensuing years.

    --
    Will you PLEASE F off with the Fing beta now?
  6. Identity crisis by RDW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Right now most bookmakers will give you very good odds on the current government actually being in power by the end of 2010. Since the other lot are supposedly going to get rid of the scheme, and there's been no large-scale rollout of the cards to the general population, it probably doesn't make a lot of sense to buy all the readers just now. Not that 'sense' really comes into this, of course.

  7. You don't say. by greenguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Britain has no readers that are able to the cards' microchip

    Hey, we all know how hard it can be to a card's microchip.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    1. Re:You don't say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I accidentally the card's microchip, is this bad? :(

    2. Re:You don't say. by BobisOnlyBob · · Score: 5, Funny

      That sentence no verb!! You have no idea how much that me. >:(

    3. Re:You don't say. by molecular · · Score: 5, Funny

      I accidentally the card's microchip, is this bad? :(

      not if you didn't the chip on purpose, then you only have to money, not to jail.

    4. Re:You don't say. by Rigrig · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as you didn't the card's microchip you can just the card's microchip, that should the card's microchip. Just don't accidentally the card's microchip.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    5. Re:You don't say. by Bazman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was going to explain this meme to people but someone seems to have accidentally the whole of encyclopediadramatica.org

      Google cache tiem:

      http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:w7oVzuVvJRYJ:encyclopediadramatica.com/I_accidentally_X+accidentally+encyclopediadramatica&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=uk&client=firefox-a

    6. Re:You don't say. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, if you would pull your smurfing smurf out of your smurf, you would smurf it perfectly fine.

    7. Re:You don't say. by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Help! I accidentally microchip!

    8. Re:You don't say. by jalet · · Score: 0

      I would find this funny, if only my daughter's History professor didn't write sentences like these all the time...

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    9. Re:You don't say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sentence no verb!! You have no idea how much that me. >:(

      That sentence no verb!! You no idea how much that me. >:(

      There it for you !

    10. Re:You don't say. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      At least it seems no-one has been able to clone these cards. That can not be said from smart passports issued in other countries...

      Oh wait. It seems the UK government is the only one that can not read their own passports. These guys did not have that problem, and apparently had their hands on more equipment that could also read the UK passports.

    11. Re:You don't say. by smcn · · Score: 1

      There is a quite NSFW picture on that page, btw.

  8. Kids these days by jsse · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yesterday you rant about giving up too much piracy, today you rant about them not being readable? I pity those cluelessnesses' failure in appreciating the beauty of unbreakable security with Write-Only-Memory(WOM) technology from Sygnetics in 1972.

    Enough about it. Get off my lawn.

    1. Re:Kids these days by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can't you see the irony here?

      The government does something no one wants, acting as if it knows best, then fucks the implementation up in ways few thought about making it worthless for the time being. It's like the drunk who swears he is able to drive, refuses to give up his keys, then gets into an accident before he gets out of the parking spot.

    2. Re:Kids these days by Eivind · · Score: 1

      If you think about it, read-only-memory also doesn't make a whole lot of sense. More properly, it should be called write-once-memory.

    3. Re:Kids these days by jimicus · · Score: 1

      A comment recommending "Write-only memory" modded informative?!

      I take it nobody read your comment properly or followed the link from it, then.

    4. Re:Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Too much piracy is not good.

    5. Re:Kids these days by mrsquid0 · · Score: 1

      >Yesterday you rant about giving up too much piracy, today you >rant about them not being readable?

      If I give up too much piracy then how will I find out about new music? Also, I prefer pirates who can read so that they will get the tags right.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    6. Re:Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yesterday you rant about giving up too much piracy

      I assume you meant Privacy?

      today you rant about them not being readable?

      they ARE readable... by everybody except the government, the exact people who are supposed to be able to read the damn things.

      And I'll stand right here 'on the lawn' until you get some better glasses, 'cause right now I'm actually in the middle of the street, Gramps.

  9. t Britain has no readers that are able... by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

    Britain has no readers that are able to the cards' microchip,

    No problem, can't we just take them round to the Russian embassy? I'm sure that they are quite capable of reading all our microchips.

    1. Re:t Britain has no readers that are able... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      can't we just take them round to the Russian embassy?

      The embassy of USA would be more appropriate - that's where all this crap is coming from.

    2. Re:t Britain has no readers that are able... by FourthAge · · Score: 1

      Trotsky and Marx are where all this crap is coming from.

      I agree that all sorts of nasty authoritarian ideas have come out of the US in the last decade, but there is a reason why the UK government thinks that ID cards and the National Identity Register are a really fantastically great idea. It has nothing to do with terrorists or US foreign policy, and everything to do with the revolutionary "heroes" that our Government worshipped when they were younger, people who saw nothing wrong with abolishing freedom in order to achieve "social equality".

      Here is an excellent but rather radical book on the subject. Don't read it unless you want to have your preconceptions challenged.

      --
      The tao of democracy: the government you can vote for is not the real government.
    3. Re:t Britain has no readers that are able... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      The embassy of USA would be more appropriate - that's where all this crap is coming from.

      Actually the French embassy would be a better bet, since they did come up with the smart cards concept.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  10. Queen song comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Faaarcical! Faaarcical!
    I like to ride my
    Faaarcical! Faaarcical!

  11. Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must have been modded by someone with no clue of old British sitcoms. Just because you don't get the reference doesn't make it offtopic!

    Will someone please fix the bad mod?

    1. Re:Offtopic? by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is offtopic. "Dad's Army" was at best tangentially related to the government.

      What you want is "Yes, Minister". Down the corridor, third on the left.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  12. "in response to an FoI request"?!? by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    the uk has a FOIA? srsly, when did this happen?

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
    1. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Xest · · Score: 4, Informative

      About 9 years ago.

    2. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Davidis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Freedom of Information Act 2000 Only exceptions to this in government is the Official secrets act. which means the information comes out in 50 years. this is better than the US where 90% of it never comes out at all. The Act

    3. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Archtech · · Score: 2, Funny

      the uk has a FOIA? srsly, when did this happen?

      I can't disclose that. It's a state secret.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    4. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      that's the uk we all know an love. sign the official secrets act, did you?

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    5. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by JohnBailey · · Score: 5, Funny

      About 9 years ago.

      It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of The Leopard.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    6. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by XSpud · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exceptions include information other that that covered by the Official Secrets Act.

      There are also a whole lot of exemptions, such as data that is commercially sensitive, related to criminal investigations or where disclosure would contravene the Data Protection Act etc. When a request is refused the reason for the exemption must be given to the requester.

      In practise the Act has meant a lot of information is now public where it wouldn't have been before.

    7. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the uk we all know an love. sign the official secrets act, did you?

      If I could tell you that I'd have to shoot you.

    8. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by MooUK · · Score: 1

      There's also an exemption that basically covers "We can't be bothered", to an extent. The TVLA/BBC loves that one.

    9. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every UK citizen is bound by the OSA whether they've signed it or not (but perhaps you knew that.)

    10. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Act is really good, and you can tell that because it is annoying the fuck out of the present government.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    11. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are you talking about?... there are no secrets in the US... any senator releases FYEO information about 20 minutes after it crosses his/er desk

      there's always some crank releasing state secrets...

       

    12. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      And then Steve Jobs went ahead and released it, and look where Apple is now...

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    13. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, there are too many exemptions. The Act was used to pull up a transcript of a hearing discussing the enforcement practises of TV Licensing. Unfortunately, their details of how many detector vans, how they work and their effectiveness was sealed as a commercial secret.

      That should not be kept hidden, after all, they use it to snoop on people.

  13. Depends on how strictly you define "UK"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as I'm pretty sure UK's so inclined criminal element has the means to read those chips.

    1. Re:Depends on how strictly you define "UK"... by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      Given how fucked-up most official software is over here, I doubt that even the manufacturer can read the things properly.

  14. Bwahahahaaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My old'English style of Identification by using coats of arms and capes has not failed me yet!

    At least my system gets you half-clothed to a standard citizen's wear.

  15. It was never about reading the cards at the border by getuid() · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was about biometric databases, computer-recognizable photographs and humongous amounts of fingerprints.

  16. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Public have been calling it much worse since it was announced. No-one really sees the need for them, nor do they really want them, but it's not something anyone in the UK really feels so strongly about that they'd actively fight against it.
    If they dropped the scheme now, no-one would miss it (but i'm sure people would miss the £4bn) and alot of people would be much happier knowing that their identities aren't readily availible to be snooped on by anyone with an RFID sniffer.

  17. Be careful by Archtech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's easy, and quite tempting, to react to this news with patronizing contempt - and think, "Well, at least we're fairly safe - such a bunch of bunglers couldn't do any real harm".

    Unfortunately, a look back at history reveals that appalling inefficiency and incompetence have usually gone hand-in-hand with authoritarian government. But whereas we can still laugh about it, the time may come when doing so is distinctly unwise. People made fun of Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini throughout their careers, and some got away with it. Others were arrested, beaten up, imprisoned, tortured, shot, or hanged with piano wire.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    1. Re:Be careful by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Sufficiently advanced bungling is indistinguishable from malice anyway. Whether it's malevolent orders from above or the apalling false positive rate on the biometrics, randomly detaining 10% of Britons attempting to use aircraft is an evil act.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Be careful by jeepien · · Score: 1

      Sufficiently advanced bungling is indistinguishable from malice anyway.

      But the real danger is that sufficiently advanced malice is indistinguishable from bungling.

    3. Re:Be careful by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I've always found bungling to be more prevalent and insidious.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Be careful by jeepien · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I've always found bungling to be more prevalent and insidious.

      I submit that since you have admitted that the two are indistinguishable, you have no basis to make that claim.

  18. Why is this news? by DavidR1991 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've only just started finalising and using these cards. Why is it surprising that there are no readers around?

    It's akin to saying that Blu-Ray or DVDs were a waste of time because initially there were no players for them - Hello, you need to wait for people to catch up, especially if the equipment is expensive (and although they're not consumer products, the same rules apply - places need to wait for grants or work out their budgets before buying or using said machines).

    Besides, practically no-one has these cards yet - and I doubt anyone will for a while, especially since they cost cash to get (It was ~£50 last I heard)

    1. Re:Why is this news? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, at least with BluRay and DVD, there were people who actually wanted them. Yes, really, these people did exist.

      Now show me one border patrol person that is eager to get yet another thingamajig into their hands that means more work for the same pay?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Why is this news? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It's a little different in this case for a number of reasons.

      This system was paid for by the taxpayer and sold to the taxpayer on all sorts of spurious grounds. With DVD and Blu-Ray, people can decide not to buy and the investment is lost - and if you object to R&D a company is carrying out right now, you can avoid funding it by not buying one of their products.

      With ID cards, you can't just write to HMRC and say "I won't be paying £100 worth of my taxes this year because they're going on a project I don't approve of" (much as many of us would love to).

      Now we find out this system won't achieve anything because organisations that might want to use it (eg. police, benefits offices) are expected to pay for readers separately out of their own budgets and this wasn't accounted for.

    3. Re:Why is this news? by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      It's akin to saying that Blu-Ray or DVDs were a waste of time because initially there were no players for them

      I'd hope there was at least one BluRay and DVD player on the market when they were first released. If not, who is going to buy them? When you've got a medium like a disk and a partner player they should be out at the same time. Granted, the early ones might not be great, but what's the point of having (say) a padlock without having produced any keys?

    4. Re:Why is this news? by DavidR1991 · · Score: 1

      "Now show me one border patrol person that is eager to get yet another thingamajig into their hands that means more work for the same pay?"

      I believe part of the ID card initiative was to make it easier to do border checks (so all the information is available in a single piece of ID)

      "This system was paid for by the taxpayer and sold to the taxpayer on all sorts of spurious grounds. With DVD and Blu-Ray, people can decide not to buy and the investment is lost - and if you object to R&D a company is carrying out right now, you can avoid funding it by not buying one of their products."

      I wasn't comparing the way they are 'sold' - what I meant is that during some stage of development on DVD/Blu-Ray there would have been no widely-available player on which to use the technology. That doesn't make the technology bad, or a waste of money; it just hasn't had a chance to penetrate the 'market' (in the same way that no-one ha ID cards yet, so the readers have been delayed/ignored for now)

    5. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why were this modded insightful? This is a government policy, not some relatively unimportant entertainment technology!

      The way this should have been implemented was infrastructure first, cards second! Its incompetence. Thats why its news! And on top of that, noone is trusting the government to get this right anyway! Especially not after the amount of lost data that was happened recently!!

    6. Re:Why is this news? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I would hope that any moderately functional government would have developed use cases for these cards, analyzed the effect of using them on length of queues, effectiveness at preventing fraud etc, AND ACTUALLY TESTED THAT THEY WORK IN AN END-TO-END PILOT, which would require working readers. It sounds to me like a sweet contract was handed to some company without any thought of the implications of implementing this plan.

      Do you think BluRay disks were developed in a vacuum without a working player (or at least a prototype) to test them? Not a chance. Technologies like that are developed hand-in-hand.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    7. Re:Why is this news? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      I can't say you are wrong, but there was no information in the article stating that they haven't tested the cards. All the article said is that there are none in practical use yet. That does make sense - installing the readers before there is a sizable number of cards in circulation, would be a waste of money. Regardless whether the scheme as a whole makes sense - it's certainly reasonable to wait with installing readers until the readers would save you time. Assuming that you can't possibly issue new cards to everybody at the same time, you will need a phased approach. If you use a phased approach there is no better way than to issue cards first and install readers later.

      I know people love stories about government incompetence, but it will not be possible to improve in this area unless we are also willing to think things through. If everything the government does is assumed to be stupid, then in turn any criticism of government activity will also be assumed to be stupid. Put yourself in the shoes of some government administrator - once he's been criticized a few times for his actions, and once he's experienced that each time criticism has been uninformed and badly thought out. Well once that happened he will very easily slip into filing all criticism under "ill-informed whining".

    8. Re:Why is this news? by GroovyTrucker · · Score: 1

      Sony Executive No. 1: "Let's send out *millions* of Blu-Ray DVDs to all the Wal-Marts in America even though we haven't made our first Blu-Ray player! We'll be rich!!!"

      Sony Executive No. 2: "Brilliant!!!"

      --
      I can be moderated as Inciteful...
  19. waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...critics are calling the £4.7bn scheme "farcical" and a "waste of time"."

    Isn't it more like a "waste of money" ?

    1. Re:waste of money by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Isn't it more like a "waste of money" ?

      Nope - the money went strait to the pockets of the well-connected. Just like very other Labour sponsored big budget project.

      www.bribe-a-lord.co.uk

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  20. Privacy will be Upheld by Kachii · · Score: 1

    critics are calling the £4.7bn scheme "farcical" and a "waste of time".

    Like so many other UK schemes.

    Personally, I never trusted my government with such data after so many incidents of loss that had nothing to do with the system (which may in itself be perfectly secure) - so maybe it's a good thing after all.

    --
    I live only for the present moment, there is no other moment.
  21. It's a trap! by slashmojo · · Score: 1

    Don't fall for it.. they want you to think they can't read the cards so you wont be so worried about getting one.

    After all they only need to call this guy for a quick solution. ;)

  22. so what else is new? by marafa · · Score: 0

    um .. so what else is new? its been 7 years since egypt introduced bar codes on the national id card. do you think ANY government agency have barcodes readers?

    --
    _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
  23. /oblig "fixed that for you" by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

    What you want is "Yes, Minister". Down the corridor, third on the left.

    I'm sorry, this is abuse. You want "Yes, Minister". Down the corridor, third on the left.

    Stupid git.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:/oblig "fixed that for you" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now somebody whacked me with a "troll" for the above. We really do have mods who have no clue of British sitcoms.

    2. Re:/oblig "fixed that for you" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's just that it was neither funny nor relevant. If it had been well-timed and on-topic, it could have been mock abuse; as it was it was just abuse.

    3. Re:/oblig "fixed that for you" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metamod -1, Less than Encyclopedic Knowledge of Monty Python.

    4. Re:/oblig "fixed that for you" by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      In fairness the mod was just overly suspicious of the man who rang the doorbell claiming to be a burglar.

  24. worn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    write once, read never

  25. Re:It was never about reading the cards at the bor by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    ...and cowing the populace into accepting such a relationship with the State as being normal. First, get the soft targets: the foreigners. Then start slicing away at the rest of us, one soft target at a time.

    Our rulers - by which I of course mean the half dozen media moguls that control the teeming masses - will be the last to have to submit to carrying and showing Ze Papers. Up until then, they'll be running this as a "Ho ho, how British!" mirth piece, rather than leading the revolution.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  26. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with all the smoke and mirrors and lies on this, if this was in the USA, I would have said that it had been a neo-con operation.

  27. HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second?! by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Her Royal Highness? Did Her Majesty abdicate?

    1. Re:HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second?! by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is why I normally use the Royal Etiquitte Add-On for Firefox. Stupid work PC.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second?! by laughing_badger · · Score: 1

      Nicely spotted. For those going 'huh?': HRH is never used by the monarch, see here

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
  28. Pythonesque... by Genda · · Score: 1

    No this is the department of silly cards... you're looking for the department of silly walks... four doors down and on the right. Now shove off you ya git!

  29. Plus you can zap the chips remotely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then the poor sucker who has one has to buy another passport/card for another 75 GBP.

  30. What a huge waste of cash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at £4.7bn that scheme is more than 'farcical' and a 'waste of time.' its also a huge waste of monetary resources!

  31. The readers aren't important by rabbitfood · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's admittedly odd that taxpayers are forced to pay for the scheme, targeted minorities are forced to buy the cards, the but the authorities can decide whether or not it's a sensible use of money.

    On the other hand, there isn't much point having the readers unless there's a reason to suspect the bearer's identity. As the scheme is voluntary, those with suspect identities won't be the first in the queue for the cards. As law-enforcement will only interested in those without cards, then there's not much point buying in them buying readers. That doesn't, on the other hand, invalidate the cards, which do still serve a purpose.

    At present, the standard identification document is the gas bill which, naturally, discriminates against tenants, people without a gas supply and people who have pre-pay meters (usually the poor). The cards therefore improve the ability of poor people to pay for the privilege of 'interacting with government', and thus improve both 'social mobility' and 'engagement'. In addition, a card with a picture on it has to be arguably more reliable than a piece of paper that can be borrowed out of a dustbin by anyone with a mind to.

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. No biggie by sepelester · · Score: 1

    They have included a chip for future use and it hasn't been implemented yet, how is this a big deal?

  34. An Orwellian scenario. by jbssm · · Score: 0

    I don't have the exact answer to what is putting us in these Orwellian times, but against all that we tough, it's not human wisdom that is keeping us out of them, but human stupidity!

  35. No problem by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

    I'm sure someone found a way to read them and the data will be uploaded to the net soon like a lot of government data.

  36. Sad by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    I was born in this country, I've lived here a long time, but I didn't spot that at all. On the one hand, I'm pleased that, as a small-r republican, I've demonstrated my lack of interest in the Winzas. On the other, perhaps I might not be as good at identifying fake coins and banknotes as I should be.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  37. Google will fix it by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They'll have drive-by readers for their Google locate-a-UK-citizen webapp.

    The thing that worries me is that the downturn means that people now working at Google, Microsoft etc. will be released into the community and will then get Government jobs. One thing worse than pervasive Govt paranoia and spying is efficient pervasive government paranoia and spying.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  38. Well done, that man by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

    May I congratulate the nameless civil servant who threw this spanner into the wrench. I'd like to hope that this particular "error" can be attributed to competence, rather than oversight.

    1. Re:Well done, that man by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I'll bet my spanner against your wrench that you're not actually British.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Well done, that man by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      I am British - but I do hope that just occasionally one of our civil servants might put country before government.

    3. Re:Well done, that man by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      OK, well the phrase is "a spanner in the works," not "a spanner in the wrench" (where a spanner and a wrench are the same thing).

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:Well done, that man by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      D'Oh. I must have had one of those "put the coffee in the fridge and the milk in the cupboard" moments when I wrote that.

  39. You wull gave to put "Criminal" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    on the "Work" section. Making it easy to catch the criminals.

    When they are all arrested, no more crime!

  40. Ok, now therwe is proof brits are really dumb. by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Ok, so either the brits are really dumb, as they didnt forsee this happening, the budget cuts to all police hqs means they can't afford one of these new machines, or it was the most brilliant scam, tally up all the loses over a period, tack it to a scapegoat of a project that you know will fail. ...voila, hands washed clean of any mess....7 billion huh....that's a pretty good cover up!

  41. Re:It was never about reading the cards at the bor by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The media moguls are no more our rulers today than when Hearst more or less invented the modern concept of the media serving the government (but it has been always thus, back to the criers of Rome, wtfever they were actually called, and presumably then some) but they may be said to be in some measure of control.

    The media outlets are instructed as to what they may or may not air, and I am not talking about the thin veneer of respectability constructed through mock moral outrage and the efforts of the FCC.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  42. See?!? Told ya! by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    And all you people were worried about big brother.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  43. Why would they? by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    Why would the government have readers for the cards? They're a huge waste of money unless you actually had a use for them. Why is it that people presume that the British government wanted people to have the cards. The British government's support and legal system was necessary to assure that everyone got a card, sure, but now that everyone's got a card, extragovernmental agencies can leverage them -- which was the original point of the exercise, was it not? No point in making the taxpayer pay for a reader you can't use and the government has little use for. You can buy your own reader (and a Pringles can)...

  44. Poor planning by furby076 · · Score: 0

    1) Spend 4.5 billion pounds
    2) Design pimp id cards
    3)
    4) Read pimp id cards on ...hmm what happend to 3?

    Present ID cards in the US, drivers license, are easily linked to a lot of your personal info - including Social, address, name, picture, drivers/criminal record, and more.

    The problem - each state has it's own ID, and worse, each state has MULTIPLE types. Bad enough there are 50 different state IDs (also one for DC, and one for Puerto Rico) but when they each have multiples (older IDs, IDs for under 21, IDs for under 18). It gets silly.

    One ID...Each state can maintain it's own rules about drivers age, but lets have one UNIFORM looking ID and spend a lot of money making it rediculously hard to clone.

    --

    I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  45. BK In the US by Dareth · · Score: 1

    In the US, Burger King owns all the intellectual property regarding horse meat in all its flame broiled goodness!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  46. The ancient joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    database, n.: a system in which one can enter thousands and thousands of records, after which it will tell that the search criteria you planned to use cannot be used at all.

  47. Postin' In A Troll Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya'll nerds postin' in a troll thread.

  48. (this could run and run...) by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Have you come here for an argument?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  49. Re:It was never about reading the cards at the bor by lordSaurontheGreat · · Score: 1

    It was about biometric databases, computer-recognizable photographs and humongous amounts of fingerprints.

    Sounds like a used iPhone.

    --
    Consider yourself spoken to.
  50. College IDs by Insightfill · · Score: 1

    When I was in college in the late 80s (yeah, I know), they had introduced the student ID card with a bar code and a magnetic strip on the back. However, they had no equipment to read either one, and the back of your card needed to display a 'valid student' sticker anyway - right over both the bar code and the strip. Four years later, still no readers, and an entrenchment of various stickers from other school functions (meal pass, library, transportation) made the back of the card useless anyway. I never did find out how that ended.

  51. USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have expected this level of incompetence from the USA.

    I've always said that if the USA turns into a police state, I'll leave the country. The question then is HOW I'd leave, if it became a closed country like North Korea.

    Simple. Considering that the TSA still lets bombs through airport security checkpoints, I'm pretty damn confident that I'd be able to "sneak" into Canada.

  52. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anything UK does these days not 'farcial'?

  53. What can I say other than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Only in Britain"

  54. Canada has a similar situation.. by greedom · · Score: 1

    It's not exactly the same. I'm more talking about the chip they put on your debt and credit cards that was supposed to eventually replace the stripe but so far even places that have a scanner for it, there doesn't seem to be any way to use it. If you stick it in, nothing happens. I've never seen one work anywhere. Useless.

    1. Re:Canada has a similar situation.. by Bryan+K.+Feir · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've seen them work. Granted, my father (who had the new chip card) had to tell the person at the hotel how to use the thing. So the readers are out there, but the training on how to work them is lacking.

  55. So What? by eyendall · · Score: 1

    It's nice for the paranoiacs among us to be reassured (if they needed it) that the "Government is not perfect. The project execution critical path appears to have come unstuck. But you don't need a machine reader to read on ID card, your eyes will do it. Assuming the ID card is of any use it surely is perfectly usable wherever it applies. Just a loss of efficiency when passing through airports or whatever

  56. Wrong assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must laugh at the prevalent assumption that the UK ID Card scheme was established to actually do something useful.

    Right at proposal stage the thing was taken to pieces by the London School of Economics, yet the whole party on the taxpayer's money went ahead unchanged. And herein lies the truth IMHO: it has handed a few people an awful lot of money, something that appears to be somewhat symptomatic of IT projects under the current government.

    Not that their National Audit Office would trouble itself with REALLY investigating: their audits exist of sending some fresh-out-of-school consultants to talk to people whose job depends on keeping their mouth shut. It's the equivalent of sending a kid with a calculator to sign off Enron's accounts. It's not that the NAO would really bite anyone anyway - check out who runs it, and check their track record.

    PS: you can't lock them up. Prisons are full..