Slashdot Mirror


Sam Raimi To Direct World of Warcraft Movie

Decado writes "Blizzard has just announced that Sam Raimi is to direct the new World of Warcraft movie. 'Raimi, acclaimed director of the blockbuster Spider-Man series, will bring the forces of the Horde and the Alliance to life in epic live-action film. Charles Roven's Atlas Entertainment will produce alongside Raimi's Stars Road Entertaiment.' While it's still early in the process, does this offer hope that someone might finally make a good movie based on a game IP?"

298 comments

  1. If you make a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Nerds will Flock to see it

    1. Re:If you make a movie by mcvos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't normally be terribly interested in a WoW movie, but if Sam Raimi does it, well, perhaps. It's certainly millions of times better than Uwe Boll or Michael Bay. Raimi knows how to make movies fun.

    2. Re:If you make a movie by Chabo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Alright you Primitive Screwheads, listen up! You see this? This... is my boomstick! The twelve-gauge double-barreled Remington. S-Mart's top of the line. You can find this in the sporting goods department. That's right, this sweet baby was made in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Retails for about a hundred and nine, ninety five. It's got a walnut stock, cobalt blue steel, and a hair trigger. That's right. Shop smart. Shop S-Mart. You got that?

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    3. Re:If you make a movie by mcvos · · Score: 1

      What the hell is wrong with the mods here? We're discussing Sam Raimi, and quotes from Army Of Darkness are off topic?

    4. Re:If you make a movie by packman · · Score: 1

      Sam Raimi doesn't exactly have a better record than Michael Bay tbh... I think they're both B- class directors... Both spiderman movies might have been a huge success - but the movies basically sucked big time. I never understood why so many people think they're good... Same goes for transformers...

      The only good 'comic book' movies I've seen were Sin City and X-Men 1&2. Ironman also surprised me. The others? Mediocre at most. I've seen them all in the theaters, but a lot of them don't deserve to spend any money on.

      Anyway - both Sam Raimi's movies and WoW don't interest me - so I don't really care he would make a WoW movie :)

    5. Re:If you make a movie by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Sam Raimi doesn't exactly have a better record than Michael Bay tbh... I think they're both B- class directors... Both spiderman movies might have been a huge success - but the movies basically sucked big time.

      Who cares about Spiderman? Has Michael Bay ever made something like Evil Dead? Army of Darkness? Drag Me To Hell?

    6. Re:If you make a movie by thrash242 · · Score: 1

      He didn't become a popular director for directing Spider-Man. He became a popular director for directing horror movies--specifically the Evil Dead Trilogy.

      Spider-Man just made him popular in the mainstream.

      Same thing with Peter Jackson. I knew his as a director of horror movies long before he directed Lord of the Rings.

  2. Wouldn't this movie... by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 5, Funny

    require WoW players to stop playing WoW?

    Can they even do that?

    1. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not only that, they'd have to leave their parent's basement.

      I think the DVD and Blu-Ray sales are going to be through the roof!

    2. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by PearsSoap · · Score: 1

      Posting to undo bad moderation.

    3. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by The+Pirou · · Score: 1

      You say that like there's a single person reading this that HASN'T sat on their computer AND watched television at the same time.

      They'll catch the coming of age crowd who fell in love with Harry Potter and try and spin that into a few hundred thousand more players, probably with some add-in game code or something to get a unique pet if you go and see it.

    4. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an early trailer out for it already http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83yoBViKZfk This is going to be the best video game movie ever.

    5. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a non-WoW player, I have a more important question : will it be subtitled ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    6. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      They'll just release it straight to DVD / Bluray, charge WOW players an extra $30 that month and then send it to them without even asking.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    7. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's interactive. You watch as Frodo the Gnome enters the world at level 1, and kills kobolds to level 80. The sequel features instance PUGging (it's a spring break drinking movie), and the trilogy rounds out with guild drama in raid content (this is more like one of those plotless teeny bopper movies where everyone is depressed and mad at their parents).

    8. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      They plan to provide WIFI at the theaters so players can bring their laptops.

      Players without laptops will require a family member or friend to take their spot in the raid, or risk getting kicked from their guild

      >.

    9. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Speaking from personal experience, yes. Been clean for just a hair over a year now, I believe, after going cold turkey.

    10. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm guessing that for any player who has been subscribed continously for more than X years it will be streamed picture-in-picture on-demand from the WoW client. You dont want to make your loyal customers stop playing do you?

    11. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by tiocsti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, any wow player can take a few hours out of their tuesday morning to watch the movie, as long as it doesn't extend past 11am pst, there's no problem.

    12. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by bughunter · · Score: 1

      [Wouldn't this movie] require WoW players to stop playing WoW?

      This movie is for casuals. Hardcores have the script on farm status already.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    13. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by cordsie · · Score: 1

      If not, they can just pay someone in China to watch it for them,

    14. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by Decado · · Score: 1

      It will be released in two different versions, the Alliance version has all the horde dialogue subtitled and the Horde version has all the alliance dialogue subtitled. This way they can make sure to keep the fans happy regardless of their faction.

      --

      Slashdot: Proof that a million monkeys at a million typewriters can create a masterpiece

    15. Re:Wouldn't this movie... by selven · · Score: 1

      You mean like the subtitles in this trailer?

      www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVfhjfvrVtM

  3. ... Film from a game... by GerardAtJob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... this film gonna be bad... like so many other film based on a game... I can't even name one good film based from a game.
    Maybe it's just a feeling...

    --
    I can't call that English ;-)
    1. Re:... Film from a game... by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clue!

      Well, at least it had Tim Curry, Madeline Khan and Christopher Llyod in it... how bad could it be?

      So bad it's good!

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:... Film from a game... by Theoboley · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If they wanted it to be really bad, they'd have gotten Uwe Boll to direct it.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    3. Re:... Film from a game... by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

      But this is Sam Raimi. It could be so bad that it might actually be good. Especially if Bruce Campbell plays both protagonist and Lich King.

    4. Re:... Film from a game... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Uwe Boll does not count. He makes no movies. He exposes film material so he gets federal movie aid money. Whether or not they do any good in the movies or whether or not anyone comes to see it, he doesn't care, he already got his money.

      Basically, my assumption is that he saves a lot of money that way because the plot is, essentially, already there.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:... Film from a game... by morari · · Score: 1

      I thought that the first Mortal Kombat was pretty good. Aside from that however, I would tend to agree. I also wonder why Raimi insists on making crap film after crap film. Why does he waste his time on licenses like Spider-Man and now Warcraft, when he should be working on the Evil Dead 4!

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    6. Re:... Film from a game... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I liked the Silent Hill movie, as well as the Resident Evil movies. Of course I didn't play the games until after, but I felt that they did a nice job getting the feeling of the game into the movie. And then in Silent Hills case, the latest game took some element of the movie which I found interesting as well.

    7. Re:... Film from a game... by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Clue!

      How interesting you should pick this movie. In this movie, if I recall correctly, they had three endings. Because the Clue game has many combinations of endings so they tried to include that spirit in the movie. I personally enjoyed it.

      Now let's look at other movies based on RPG games like Final Fantasy or Hitman. I must confess I've not seen or played the latter but let's face it, you have a definite ending in the game and you get a definite ending in the movie. Much more tangible to translate to the movie what makes the game so good -- plot (or what you have of it).

      Now let's look at games that have no definite ending or story like Dungeons and Dragons. Ever see that movie? How painful. Why? Because it could not embody what makes the game so great: the unexpected. And once it's laid on celluloid, what's done is done. We're not going to watch Dungeons and Dragons and have the dungeon master lay different traps or experiences for the player every time we watch it. And, effectively, the movie cannot embody what I see as the greatest part of D&D. It can't even leave much to the imagination. It was doomed.

      I see World of Warcraft following the same path as D&D. You're not going to get the great game mechanics, instances, battlegrounds, unique experience, etc. that you find in the game and package it into a movie. It's bound to disappoint because by definition, it must embody something that cannot contain what makes the game great. You might as well lift the plot from Dune, The Count of Monte Cristo or Lord of the Rings and dump it into the Warcraft universe. This movie has the odds stacked against it. Especially if I am expecting the World of Warcraft experience from it. How do you build an ending to a movie for a game that has no ending?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    8. Re:... Film from a game... by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't even name one good film based from a game.

      Resident Evil was pretty good and it actually one of the few video game movies that actually didn't just make random shit up for its own plot.

      Beyond that I'm hard pressed to think of any movies based on games that were any good... There was the first Mortal Kombat movie, but it was about as good as a Van Dam movie.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    9. Re:... Film from a game... by Krneki · · Score: 1

      I liked the first Resident Evil.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    10. Re:... Film from a game... by samriel · · Score: 5, Informative

      I see World of Warcraft following the same path as D&D. You're not going to get the great game mechanics, instances, battlegrounds, unique experience, etc. that you find in the game and package it into a movie. It's bound to disappoint because by definition, it must embody something that cannot contain what makes the game great. You might as well lift the plot from Dune, The Count of Monte Cristo or Lord of the Rings and dump it into the Warcraft universe. This movie has the odds stacked against it. Especially if I am expecting the World of Warcraft experience from it. How do you build an ending to a movie for a game that has no ending?

      I may be wrong on this, but the press release only says "the Warcraft© universe", not "World of Warcraft". This means that the movie could, indeed, have a definite ending, as the first three games did. Previous rumors seem to support the idea that the movie will be based somewhere between Warcraft III and World of Warcraft, as does the whole "Warcraft© universe" thing that was stated.

      /IANADOWUH - I Am Not A Director Or Warcraft Universe Historian

    11. Re:... Film from a game... by hedwards · · Score: 0, Troll

      Or Michael Bay for that matter, at list with Sam Raimi there's the possibility that it'll be worth watching. That being said, it's WoW, who cares? We've got a game that's popular but is that really justification for making a film about it?

      Personally I loved Doom and it was a popular game, but well, we all know how that turned out.

    12. Re:... Film from a game... by somersault · · Score: 1

      The Resident Evil series and Silent Hill movie were pretty good IMO. I didn't like the camera angles/controls in RE though (and never tried the rest of the series, though I did see someone playing 3 or 4 and it still looked pretty crap), and never tried Silent Hill. If I was a fan of the games, perhaps I wouldn't have enjoyed the movies..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    13. Re:... Film from a game... by bitslinger_42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been playing WoW for 3-4 years now, and I'm curious as to what unique experiences you're looking for. Getting ganked during the Stranglethorn fishing contest? Spending 40 hours fishing pools in Northrend trying to get the sea turtle mount? Watching some bot-based toon running in circles for some Chinese gold farmer? Spending 30 minutes challenging the door boss to get in to an instance?

      While there aren't ends for the players, there are story lines that run through the game. Theoretically, they could easily pick something from the Lich King, the whole Scourge vs. everybody fight thing, but I suspect that pessimism here is warranted. I don't enjoy the game itself, per se. I like having something to do while chatting with guildies. That, and the achievement system integrates nicely with my OCD.

    14. Re:... Film from a game... by Hausenwulf · · Score: 1

      Naw, Bruce Campbell has to be one of those annoying bubble-hearthing paladins. His big chin is perfect for the part.

    15. Re:... Film from a game... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      DND movies should have and very well could have been choose your own adventure. They could have worked exactly like choose your own adventure books. Albeit less complicated for some vague sense of fluidity. Released straight to dvd would not have been in issue for dnd movies. The idea of using your dvd player to actually do stuff which would horrify most people would likely not daunt dnd fans. And it could have some moderate replay value. You would of course need to be inventive in making the plot mesh together niceley and be able to reuse clips or have multiple paths touch rejoin for important events. But these I'm sure are things choose your own adventure authors are used to. Makes me sad that they didn't because it is the only genre it would work in at all...

    16. Re:... Film from a game... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I can't even name one good film based from a game."

      Advent Children was really good.

      If you're not watching from the PoV of an FF7 fan, then no, it really wasn't. It was pretty.

    17. Re:... Film from a game... by Binary+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Keep in mind, the Warcraft universe has a highly developed lore - while the story isn't always a major focus in WoW, it's there, it's been explored in novels, comics and other media - I'd expect the movie to be more like this, a telling of the underlying Warcraft story, than an attempt to translate the game into cinema.

    18. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I know, fool me twice and all that, but I think the upcoming Prince of Persia film might not be bad.

    19. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I don't know. The movies based on the MMO Lord of the Rings Online seemed pretty good. Really captured the personality of the Dwarven tanks. However, three movies seemed excessive for a video game movie.

    20. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, when Clue was in its initial theatre run, each night they only played one ending. So if you saw it Saturday, but I saw it Friday, when we discussed it later we'd have different ideas of who did it. A wonderful gimmick to get people to pay to see it again.

    21. Re:... Film from a game... by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      Clue!

      Now let's look at games that have no definite ending or story like Dungeons and Dragons. Ever see that movie? How painful. Why? Because it could not embody what makes the game so great: the unexpected. And once it's laid on celluloid, what's done is done. We're not going to watch Dungeons and Dragons and have the dungeon master lay different traps or experiences for the player every time we watch it. And, effectively, the movie cannot embody what I see as the greatest part of D&D. It can't even leave much to the imagination. It was doomed.

      Yes, the D&D movies sucked. I recommend watching "Dorkness Rising", which is a D&D spoof movie, to alleviate the pain. It's actually pretty funny.

      --
      Interesting.
    22. Re:... Film from a game... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I also wonder why Raimi insists on making crap film after crap film. Why does he waste his time on licenses like Spider-Man and now Warcraft, when he should be working on the Evil Dead 4!

      Is Drag Me To Hell that bad? I haven't seen it yet, but I heard it was reaching back to the days if Evil Dead. WoW in Army Of Darkness style is something I might watch.

    23. Re:... Film from a game... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      But this is Sam Raimi. It could be so bad that it might actually be good. Especially if Bruce Campbell plays both protagonist and Lich King.

      Oh man, they could easily do that if they do the story of how the Lich King came to be and it would be awesome.

      [In the snow of Northrend, Arthas, his mind already becoming corrupted, is confronted by a sinister doppelganger of himself]

      Arthas: What demonic trickery is this?! What are you?

      Bad Arthas: [mocking child-like voice] I'm baad Arthas. And you're good Arthas! You're a goodie little two shoes! [Bad Arthas dances back and forth, teasing Arthas and singing] Little-goodie-two-shoes. Little-goodie-two-shoes.

      Arthas: Good. Bad. I'm the guy with the sword. [decapitates Bad Arthas with a single swipe of Frostmourne].

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    24. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advent Children was terrible. It's written like an amateurish fan-fiction continuation of a story that needs no continuation. The plot was stupid, the acting sucked and they had to shoe-horn every main character from the game in there just for the hell of it like in that Street Fighter movie. It felt like I was watching a boring video game FMV without the video game part.

    25. Re:... Film from a game... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      But the Lich King started as Arthas, the most annoying pally of all. It's perfect!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    26. Re:... Film from a game... by Phyvo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think they can pull it off with WoW, because while the *game* moves on, various subplots don't. They could totally make a movie about Onyxia or C'thun getting pwnzored, because they can choose from any subplot they darn well please. They could even do the origin of Deathwing and the creation of the demon soul, events which have never taken place in WoW the game but are an important part of the lore.

      The thing with DnD is not just that it, as a game, has no definite ending. It just doesn't have the same lore structure to back it up. DnD (from an outsider's perspective, at least) lacks NPCs with names who run around doing important stuff. WoW doesn't lack any of that because of its RTS storylines, which since day 1 have guided the path of stories that WoW has told.

      Onyxia was killed, C'thun lies dead, Kiljaden was defeated, and now the Lich King has the Alliance and Horde knocking on his front door crying for blood. Stories in WoW end, even if the game itself doesn't.

    27. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It wasn't even that pretty, computer graphics like that stopped being impressive about a decade ago. It was brown. Why the fuck did they make it brown?

      Not to mention that the movie itself was like the Final Fantasy equivalent of a Brady Bunch reunion special.

    28. Re:... Film from a game... by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      What gets me about AoD is that line wasn't in the director's cut. I believe the commentary track makes make mention that they like the revised line better than the original "I'm not that good."

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    29. Re:... Film from a game... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      That.. doesn't really work. A good story is a good story. LoTR wasn't unexpected at any point (this is /. if you haven't read LotR you don't belong here), that doesn't mean it was bad.

      I'm not expecting a lot out of this movie, but it'll be neat just to have a movie out there with such a high (hopefully!) concentration of non-human characters that are more than backdrops. And that aren't named Jar Jar. Hell, just lifting the story straight from WC3 would make a pretty epic movie.

      WoW really exists apart from the actual Warcraft universe if you will. I mean dude.. it's not like when they'd release a book or another WC game, they're going to include all the main characters sitting around 24/7 in their respective capital cities like they do in-game. Not gonna have all these boss npcs getting killed once a week by various small groups. It's a whole different thing, they only interact very nebulously.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    30. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, final fantasy was terrible because it was made by the people who made the game, and they thought: look, we film or create 30x the length of a feature length film in full motion video assets for our game, so we should be able to make a film with like 1/30th the effort. 1/10th at the most.

      They tried to make a short game composed entirely of cutscenes, rather than making a real movie. The difference is palpable.

    31. Re:... Film from a game... by flitty · · Score: 1

      I don't enjoy the game itself, per se. I like having something to do while chatting with guildies.

      I would say this is 99% of wow players. I don't know many people who are still playing WoW who are showing up for the wonderful storylines. I mean, the Caverns of Time added some interesting easter eggs for those who did care, but a WoW movie is a bad idea.

      That's not to say that a Warcraft Movie would be a bad thing. You really could make a good action/fantasy movie based off the first 3 games and the backstory behind the world. The Warcraft universe has some pretty movie-ready moments in it, but I'm going to not expect much from this film.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    32. Re:... Film from a game... by flitty · · Score: 1

      Is Drag Me To Hell that bad?

      No. Go see it. It's probably in the cheap theaters (if it's still in theaters) and worth every penny. I think some people hated it is because the Studio marketed the movie like a scary movie, which while it has it's scary moments, it's still "Raimi horror", which is so much better for those who know what they're getting into.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    33. Re:... Film from a game... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I only watch Legend of the Seeker because it is so bad that it's awesome. It is every swords & sorcery cliche there ever was, and then some.

      No one but Sam Raimi could ever do justice to this movie.

      Also, random Ted Raimi cameo FTW. He should be Leeroy Jenkins!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    34. Re:... Film from a game... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      While I am skeptical about how a Warcraft movie will come off, I actually have hope for it. The folks at Blizzard, and a few dedicated writers have put together a fairly good fantasy world (if a bit cliche) which has any number of good plot lines to use for a movie. I'm not really expecting that it will be World of Warcraft: The Movie, I'm expecting that it will either lift one of the plot lines from the existing series of games, or simply carry one of the plots currently in the game to conclusion. There's a small piece of me which thinks that Blizzard may use this as a vehicle to tell the story of the final defeat of the Lich King Arthas, but that could just be wishful thinking.

      I have to disagree about the reasons for the failure of the Dungeons and Dragons movie. If it were the case that the D&D game didn't translate well to static media, the books would not be doing well. But that is not the case, between the Dragonlance novels and the Forgotten Realms novels, D&D as a static form of entertainment has done quite well. However, in spite of great writing by the likes of Weiss and Hickman, Ed Greenwood, or some of Salvatore's stuff, the folks who put together the movie decided that what a D&D movie needed was more Marlon Wayans. And not even well written SNL Marlon Wayans, but a bad rendition of Chris Tucker's character from the Fifth Element, which was intentionally annoying and over the top, and then Marlon Wayans took that character over the top. His character was so annoying and awful that the audience in the theater cheered when he died, literally let out a loud cheer. The only sad thing about that scene was that it was special effects and we, the audience, were not being treated to a well deserved snuff film of Marlon Wayans actually being killed. Add to that horrid character an arch-nemesis who's entire shtick is "I'm blue and EVIL!!11!one!" No development, no background, no motivation, just EVIL. Granted, that is pretty common in D&D games, but I was expecting slightly better from a movie. We also had dragons which were just the bastard love children of a tyrannosaurus and a pterodactyl, with no ancient intelligence, and computer graphics so bad it was physically painful. While I will agree that a good D&D movie would be very hard, I don't think it's impossible, it would just look a hell of a lot like the Lord of the Rings movies, largely because D&D stole very heavily from Tolkien.

      Now, as for the Warcraft movie, I do see one huge problem: styling. Take a good look at the armor, weapons and equipment most Warcraft characters and creatures wear. It's ridiculous. It's a case of "let's see how large we can make it! Now add a few spikes, a few more spikes, fuck it add a bucket full of spikes! And make it Glow! Oh, and make sure it has spikes." You could use the word "impractical" to describe it, but that would be like describing the universe as "big." It fails to capture the true extent of the situation. It's fine in a video game, as video gamers we're more interested in looking cool versus practicality. Inside each of us there is that ten year old who wants to see the Flaming Sword of Awesomeness and Fire with a dragon's head pommel, a bat-wing crossguard and intricate etched runes and filigree down a jagged lightning bolt shaped blade, on fire. And in a video game, we're willing to suspend disbelief just enough that we ignore the obvious implications of the wielder tearing up his own hand, not being able to sheath the damn thing because of the shape and fire, and gods help the wielder if he actually hits something, because it's going to be stuck. But on a big screen, with the hero looking like a ridiculous twat with sholderpads which would have made Madonna in the '80's laugh; armor which is catching on everything, and stabbing him when he ties to itch his nose; we're just not going to buy it. The ridiculousness is going to be obvious, and because we'll have some pretty boy actor in it, it will just be wrong. About the only way out of it I see is for a CG movie ala Toy Story. I don't know why, but when a movie is animated we seem more willing to let the ridiculous go.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    35. Re:... Film from a game... by meerling · · Score: 1

      Over a year ago Uwe Boll approached Blizzard to let him do the WoW movie.
      They made it rather clear to even him, No Fng Way... :)

      Easy to find articles about that, here's a couple to get you started.
      http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/52322
      http://warcraft.moviechronicles.com/2008-04/blizzard-laugh-away-uwe-boll/

    36. Re:... Film from a game... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is what they're doing. Blizzard has only ever referred to this movie as the "Warcraft movie". It's the fans who have misconstrued that as meaning it's based on the game WoW.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    37. Re:... Film from a game... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      What gets me about AoD is that line wasn't in the director's cut. I believe the commentary track makes make mention that they like the revised line better than the original "I'm not that good."

      Yeah I know... I don't know why a "director's cut" wouldn't use the dialog that the director liked best. I always thought that's what "director's cut" meant, that he would include/exclude whatever versions and cuts that he liked best, not that it was whatever state the movie was in before final editing.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    38. Re:... Film from a game... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, the whole time I was watching Legend of the Seeker, I was thinking "Hmmmm, Stargate already did this 10 years ago!"
      Goatee'd villains with uncountable anonymous henchmen? Constant worries about betrayal? "Sufficiently advanced" technology/magic? Yup, pretty much all the bases covered.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    39. Re:... Film from a game... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      True. The casting of the chin will be an integral component to this film's success.

    40. Re:... Film from a game... by TOGSolid · · Score: 1

      The lore to WoW could easily be made up into a fairly epic sized movie (otherwise, I'm sure they could just do an hour and a half of barrens chat acted out). However, I really don't think Sam Raimi is the best director for handling LotR sized events.

    41. Re:... Film from a game... by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Super Mario Brothers Movie was awesome, I don't know what game films you watched.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    42. Re:... Film from a game... by Chabo · · Score: 1

      the Caverns of Time

      Is that anything like the Timesink Cavern?

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    43. Re:... Film from a game... by Reivec · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure why there is so much speculation on the basics of the story line when blizzard has already been talking about this for some time.

      http://www.gamespot.com/news/6176224.html?tag=top_stories;title;0

      It will cover part of the lore before the timeline for WoW began. All the comments about the movie trying to replicate a repeatative gameplay mechanic have obviously never paid one bit of attention to the game or read any of the quest logs etc. There is plenty of story there. The game must remain static so people can take part over and over again but the STORY is not static. They tried to remedy some of this in the last xpac by using phased zones where different players see different things depending on what quests they have completed.

    44. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's hoping that Bruce Campbell plays a large role in this movie.

    45. Re:... Film from a game... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      ...Dungeons and Dragons. Ever see that movie? How painful. Why?

      The director blames the people at TSR/WOTC , that forced him to use an old script, even though he had a vastly improved one.

    46. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the first mortal kombat movie was nice

    47. Re:... Film from a game... by hitnrunrambler · · Score: 0

      Speaking of cast that makes the movie...

      This one will be directed by Sam Reimi; It would be AWESOME if Bruce Campbell plays at least 5 different characters.

    48. Re:... Film from a game... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      I didn't mind "In the Name of the King", which is based on Dungeon Siege. It was pretty good, and made me want to play the game again.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    49. Re:... Film from a game... by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      >blockquote>I can't even name one good film based from a game.

      Resident Evil was good. Not a great film of course, but it was relatively good.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    50. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruce Campbell should cameo as Leroy Jenkins.

    51. Re:... Film from a game... by corezz · · Score: 1

      Silent Hill is probably the best game to film conversion that i've seen. It seems to actually tell a descent ghost story with some nice visual effects (definitely check it out). Resident Evil would be my #2 game-to-film conversion. I was actually very surprised that it was entertaining. The sequel was AWFUL and the 3rd film was meh (one cool seen where they fry those crows though). Besides those 2 films i think everything else is just too stupid or embarrassing to mention.

    52. Re:... Film from a game... by Ifandbut · · Score: 0

      Maybe everyone who replied to the parent about Advent Children sucking should watch the director's cut Blu-Ray. The original movie did have some plot holes and some things did not make much sense, however the extra 20-30 min in the Blu-Ray version really flesh out the plot.

      I enjoyed Advent Children tremendously.

      I also disagree with that one AC said about "computer graphics like that stopped being impressive about a decade ago". Please, someone name 2 films that get this close to total photo realism. The only 2 I can think of both have Final Fantasy in their name.

    53. Re:... Film from a game... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but Dungeons & Dragons is probably the most likely game ever devised to become a quality picture, and it pretty well sucked. It's nice to know that people around here care enough about Michael Bay to mod me troll for pointing out that he sucks.

      Now if only he could have figured out that the film named "Transformers" ought to be about "Transformers" we might all have been spared a boring film lead up to a half hour of awesome.

    54. Re:... Film from a game... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      The thing I found most disappointing about the D&D movie was that the plot was incoherent with poor continuity. Which, could be argued is in the spirit of the game. My opinion of the movie improved when I watched the deleted scenes on DVD, they were mostly deleted because they ran out of money to complete the special effects shots - and the scenes in question held most of the exposition. Doh!

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    55. Re:... Film from a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Advent Children wasn't close to photo-realism at all. It was a dull gray and brown fest with deformed anime characters - despite popular belief in the video game industry, real isn't brown. There aren't many feature-length CGI films that have really strived for photo-realism, but I've seen countless video game cinematics that have come closer to photo-realism, and big budget films which inter-mix between live action and computer graphics are almost invariably more impressive. This kind of thing had the "wow" factor to it back in the late 90's when people were just starting to get it right, but nobody cares anymore.

      I haven't seen the extended version, but my problem with Advent Children's plot wasn't that it wasn't fleshed out enough, just that it was mind-numbingly stupid. And I still maintain that Final Fantasy 7 needs a sequel like Rush Limbaugh needs cake.

    56. Re:... Film from a game... by Spookticus · · Score: 1

      Warcraft mythology is very unique and involving. There are so many angels that they could come from such as starting early in time when the titans were molding azeroth to the first great war by the burning legion through the well of eterntity. They could start with the more recent storyline started by Warcraft III or create a story in between WC3 and WoW. The only other franchise that has as deep a story behind it would be Magic TCG. Any who, if blizzard is going to be involved in production then I think they will fine tune it to give the impression they are shooting for as they have done in each of their games. I would also be interested in if they movie is going to be CGI or live-action. Blizzard has done some pretty nice looking cut scenes for their games that I would be interested in seeing how this works out. Also you can read up on Warcraft mythology on WoW's home page.

    57. Re:... Film from a game... by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      I watched Clue on TV again the other day for the first time since I was kid, expecting it not to live up to my memory. I'm delighted to says it was a genuinely worthy piece of comedy. Superb performances from a brilliantly selected cast, reminiscent of the Marx Brothers and other "classic" comedy. I don't think it deserves to be described as bad in any way. A lot of the comic conceits were potentially corny or cliched but the execution rendered them genuinely funny.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    58. Re:... Film from a game... by dontPanik · · Score: 1

      /IANADOWUH - I Am Not A Director Or Warcraft Universe Historian

      Take note slashdot commenters, this is an essential acroynm!

      --
      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
    59. Re:... Film from a game... by thrash242 · · Score: 1

      Silent Hill was quite good, IMO, and I'm saying that as a hardcore Silent Hill fan.

      I'm not sure how people who had never played the games liked it, but, as a fan, it was much better than I expected.

  4. Thank God by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

    Thank God they didn't tap Uwe Bol for this one.

    1. Re:Thank God by Trinexx · · Score: 1

      Didn't they laugh him out of their offices when he offered to direct it?

    2. Re:Thank God by SBFCOblivion · · Score: 1
      He actually approached Blizzard wanting to make a WoW movie and they rejected him.

      "We will not sell the movie rights, not to you...especially not to you."

      Ha.

    3. Re:Thank God by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Great link. :)

      Gotta love this quote:

      "To be honest, the real gamers are the typical download guys, right?" Boll reasoned. "They don't pay anything for movies, because they illegally download the movies. So why [should I] please these guys? I need the normal audience."

      You repeatedly come up snake-eyes on that roll too, you shithead.

    4. Re:Thank God by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Didn't they laugh him out of their offices when he offered to direct it?

      That's certainly what I heard. I'm glad the Blizzard guys have some taste.

  5. Try as I might by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't imagine remotely what this movie will actually be like. But I suspect it will suck.

    1. Re:Try as I might by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hours and hours of repetitive grinding ?
      Gold farmer spamming the screen ?
      Kids speaking shit, lol'ing.
      "Sexy" elves dancing for a couple ... erm, for 1 gold piece...

      Yup ! gonna be a greeeeeeeat movie.

  6. Edit: by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

    Edit: Hopefully they won't cast Ben Affleck as Varian Wrynn either... or in any role, for that matter.

    1. Re:Edit: by cabjf · · Score: 2, Funny

      They better at least include Chuck Norris, after having to hear so much about him in-game.

    2. Re:Edit: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he can get his:

      Anal Revenge

    3. Re:Edit: by abe+ferlman · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can get Shatner to play a Shaman who can't stop talking about Chuck Norris's character in the Barrens.

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    4. Re:Edit: by DarksideDaveOR · · Score: 1

      A Chuck Norris cameo might even work in a Raimi movie. Not many could pull it off.

  7. Hmm... by XPeter · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember Dungeons and Dragons The Movie and how awesome that turned out? Or the TV series based on Super Mario and Zelda?

    Yeah...

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Hmm... by Niris · · Score: 1

      Or the Mario movie. That one was great, too. Of all the people to direct though, why the guy that did spiderman? He made those suck pretty bad.

    2. Re:Hmm... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Or the TV series based on Super Mario and Zelda?

      Hey! That cartoons series was pretty damn good if you ask me.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Hmm... by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However the budget-challenged, direct-to-video sequel to the D&D movie, although not a masterpiece of storytelling, actually managed to capture the feel and pace of playing an old-fashioned late-1st edition D&D game of high level (9th-10th level) characters. If they've continued churning out a series of films in that style, I would have happily bought them up.

    4. Re:Hmm... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Seeings as where 75% of all D&D players out there buy into the "You're a level 1 potato farmer, A mighty wizard has chosen you and your friends to slay a giant and dragon army that has decimated three kingdoms" kind of adventures, I think the movie was pretty accurate.

      Seriously, the D&D player base has been a wreck for about two decades now. The D&D film may not have been high art but neither is D&D.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    5. Re:Hmm... by Stele · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Spider Man movies sucked so much they only made almost a Billion dollars EACH world-wide.

    6. Re:Hmm... by Niris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So we're judging quality by how much money is gained through effective marketing now? That's lovely. By your logic, Star Wars Episode 1 was _amazing_!

    7. Re:Hmm... by SBFCOblivion · · Score: 1

      IMO the first two were great. It's when he got the brilliant idea of directing AND writing the screenplay for the third movie that it sucked the hard one.

      While I enjoy the Evil Dead movies I'll never understand what made him think he was qualified to write the screenplay for Spiderman. He totally ruined it.

    8. Re:Hmm... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Or the TV series based on Super Mario and Zelda?

      Yeah...

      WTF? The Zelda cartoon was aweseome.

    9. Re:Hmm... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Spider Man movies sucked so much they only made almost a Billion dollars EACH world-wide.

      And as we all know, popularity is directly proportional to quality...

      *Goes too look up American Idol stats on his Dell Windows-Based PC*

    10. Re:Hmm... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      why the guy that did spiderman?

      You mean the guy that did Evil Dead?

      Even the first Spiderman movie wasn't all that bad for a superheo movie, although he clearly didn't have the kind of freedom he had with Army Of Darkness.

    11. Re:Hmm... by linzeal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah and what is up with the DnD folks being all teetotalers now? Back in my day, we were taking LSD, smoking pot and drinking Pig's Eye beer and coffee for days up in Minnesota during the cold cold winter. We had vampire the masquerade as well as our own material, DnD 2nd Ed rules and Rift stuff usually appearing 36-48 hours in, after the 2nd or 3rd tab this usually devolved into legions of naked vampire women fucking and sucking their way across the land while our tank upgraded from being a Paladin to a debauched Juicer and I usually ended up either being a Malkavian (crazy) vampire who thought he was Santa Claus and carried a 10 foot tall flaming chainsaw that played Xmas tunes or a Glitter Boy with 6 arms and 2 Rail Guns. I went to a 3rd Ed DnD game recently with some co-workers in their early 20's and they became angry at me when I wanted to attempt to mate with the Orc with my evil chaotic evil monk instead of fighting it. The entire night, the whole 2 hours they did not fuck with the GM once, the GM read his story like a script and they talked mostly about television shows and work drama. I never went back even though they asked. Reason they were lame, methinks it was the fact that they were drinking iced green tea and water and no sugary, fatty or salty snacks. They had fucking herbed goat's cheese and those Scandinavian hard tack crackers. Yeah sure if I eat enough cheeseburgers I'll roleplay eating crackers with smelly white curd on them, but don't make me eat the props.

    12. Re:Hmm... by Freetardo+Jones · · Score: 1

      Or the TV series based on Super Mario and Zelda?

      The Super Mario and Zelda cartoons were great.

    13. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The D&D Movie was a comedy, and in that respect it was a serviceable bit of campiness.

      I'm struck by the fact that the new TV series "Merlin" has pretty much identical production values to that movie. It's a shame too, because by making Uther more or less a tyrant, they had potential for making it interesting, but overall it's Avalon 90210

    14. Re:Hmm... by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      You want to see the pinnacle of awesome, go watch the Double Dragon movie and the Super Mario Bros. movie back to back*.

      *Disclaimer: You may actually claw your eyes out by the time you finish both movies.

    15. Re:Hmm... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Well, excuuuuuuuse me, Prin....I mean, vertinox!

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    16. Re:Hmm... by DarksideDaveOR · · Score: 1

      Raimi himself guarantees an audience. Not as much as the IP in this case, but it's still not a bad bet.

      Plus I'm sure there are tons of Evil Dead fans at Blizzard.

    17. Re:Hmm... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I'm talking about. Back in my day D&D was about being a goof on some little random adventure. Today everyone wants it to be Lord of the Rings on steroids. Uber-epic is the word of today.

      My nephew, who has hardly ever played D&D spits on the idea of being a level 5 fighter and go beat some orcs up in a dungeon for the local lord and get paid 50 gold for the group to do it. God forbid it doesn't involve prestige classes, high magic and army vs army style combat.

      Throwing a d20 isn't what it use to be.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    18. Re:Hmm... by dontPanik · · Score: 1

      WTF? The Zelda cartoon was aweseome.

      Well Excuuuuuuuuuuuuuse me Princess!

      --
      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
  8. spiderman 3 by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    Did anyone forget the shitstain that was Spiderman 3?

    We had emo Peter Parker, and a song and dance number in the middle of it!

    Here's hoping Raimi goes back to his evil dead roots and makes a proper movie . . .

    oh yeah and Bruce Campbell had better be in it!

    1. Re:spiderman 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haven't seen drag me to hell yet? no campbell though

    2. Re:spiderman 3 by DarthBender · · Score: 1

      oh yeah and Bruce Campbell had better be in it!

      And Ted Rami too. Go Joxer!

    3. Re:spiderman 3 by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but Parker *is* emo. He stole all of Batman's emo in the first Marvel/DC crossover. My problem with Spiderman3 was the "Blob" origin for Venom.

    4. Re:spiderman 3 by polle404 · · Score: 1

      oh yeah and Bruce Campbell had better be in it!

      He'd make an ecxellent Leeroy Jenkins!

      --

      ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
    5. Re:spiderman 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every comic origin for Venom that I've ever seen was as some form a space-borne spore that could move/shape/stretch itself to do what it wanted to... blob? not quite - blob-ish - possibly.. but it syncs with the comics...

    6. Re:spiderman 3 by Ben+Newman · · Score: 1

      I thought he did, just a couple of months ago.

    7. Re:spiderman 3 by Satanboy · · Score: 1

      what I find interesting is that the original origin of the symbiotic venom suit was in Secret Wars, I find it strange that it's origin was reimagined so many times after.

    8. Re:spiderman 3 by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      oh yeah and Bruce Campbell had better be in it!

      He'd make an ecxellent Leeroy Jenkins!

      Why... WHY!?!?!?
      Now, for the rest of the day, I'll have images of him sitting at a table with Michael Wesson with a mojito to his left and a bucket of KFC to his right, saying "At least I got chicken..."

    9. Re:spiderman 3 by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Emo Parker wasn't all that bothersome to me as it fit with the influence of Venom.

      What ticked me off was his kiss with the girl on stage. Which he knew Mary Jane would witness. Before he is influenced by Venom at all. That kind of behaviour doesn't fit at all with his character development to that point. People do stupid things but that's a pretty monumental screwup in a section of his life that he'd likely be very sensitive to.

    10. Re:spiderman 3 by Franklin+Brauner · · Score: 1

      Apparently you didn't see Drag Me To Hell, where Raimi did go back to his roots -- and with great success. It's an awesome movie.

  9. No by edremy · · Score: 1

    And No again since blank messages get rejected

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  10. Catacylsm by nicolasmendo · · Score: 1

    Maybe the movie will be called Cataclysm?

  11. Repeat by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the real WoW experience, buy it on DVD and watch it a few hundred times.

    1. Re:Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As my good friend pointed out, if you want the old school experience, get 40 people who don't necessarily like each other and organise a time each week for all of them to cram into one room and watch a particular scene. Be sure to rewind the scene when one of them acts like an asshat.

    2. Re:Repeat by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      It will be a DVD on blue ray. After the first run it starts over with a few things changed. Then the next one has a few more things changed. This repeats until the blue ray disk is full.

      Then you insert disk number 2, and it that pattern continues.

      The challenge is to see what the differences are.

    3. Re:Repeat by jeffliott · · Score: 1

      And you wouldn't even have to pay for it every month! Ah shit, I shouldn't have said that...

    4. Re:Repeat by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      why watch it once, you get maximum benefit if you buy it on dvd 8 times and watch from different angles.

      multiboxing. for when you need more friends.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Repeat by Get+on+the+boat · · Score: 1

      Why spend the time to watch it yourself? Pay a few bucks to a dozen people to watch it for you so you can get to the end faster.

    6. Re:Repeat by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      As my good friend pointed out, if you want the old school experience, get 40 people who don't necessarily like each other and organise a time each week for all of them to cram into one room and watch a particular scene. Be sure to rewind the scene when one of them acts like an asshat.

      Damn you for posting AC. You actually made me laugh aloud.

    7. Re:Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it would be rent the DVD a few hundred times.

    8. Re:Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All for 50 more achievement points!

    9. Re:Repeat by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

      Okay, everyone in my office now knows I'm not working.

      Thanks for making me laugh out loud in the middle of a quiet workday.

  12. I'm guessing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will set a new record for "Longest Movie Ever". It'll track a mage's journey across Azeroth, showing in excruciating detail all ten days of his adventure to level 80, casting the same spell on thousands of enemies, and collecting wolf pelts for people like John Wolfskinner, who can't seem to do their own work. And that's only part one.

    1. Re:I'm guessing... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 4, Funny

      This just gave me an idea for a screen saver. It shows your wow character farming gold. Sometimes, a few horde [alliance] guys jump out and kill your character, and you get to watch it make a spirit run back. Sometimes, some other farmer will train a bunch of mobs onto you. Sometimes you'll miss 32 hits in a row (Warriors only) while poisoned. Sometimes, you will also get guild chat talking about faked moon landings, religion, their current middle school experiences, how much weed/beer they just smoked/drank, and you'll get a pre-pubescent guild leader shouting at everyone over vent. I will charge $60 a year to run it on your computer. It will be everything the real WoW experience gives, except cheaper!

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    2. Re:I'm guessing... by PHPNerd · · Score: 1

      They already made that: http://progressquest.com/

    3. Re:I'm guessing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How I wish what you just described didn't sound so tempting...

  13. This is not going to go well... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Games, in principle, could make perfectly decent movies(half life could really do with a decent treatment); but I have a very bad feeling about this one.

    Because of their business model, MMORPGs have to feature large worlds where large numbers of characters can be the center of attention, to the degree that there even is one. In most cases, WoW being one, there isn't even much in the way of "history" going on. The world stays pretty much the same, no matter what you do, the same NPCs show up, with only the occasional prescripted changed. That isn't inspiring material for a movie. At best, they'll pretty much have to make a Warcraft movie and just use WoW as a marketing tie-in.

    1. Re:This is not going to go well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is, the Warcraft universe itself has an impressive amount of lore. My guess is they'll simply pick a single timeframe within the history that has been created for that universe and tell a single story. Doing this would keep the story focused and if Blizzard maintains some creative control and they get a good writer or two, this could actually turn out well. I'm not saying it WILL, just that I'm holding out some hope and intentionally forgetting Spiderman 3.

    2. Re:This is not going to go well... by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

      Games, in principle, could make perfectly decent movies(half life could really do with a decent treatment)

      The problem with game>movie transitions is the same problem with movie>game transitions. In both scenarios you have a set amount of people who are going to buy the game or see the movie for no other reason than the name. Since the developer or producer can already count on X amount of sales regardless of how much time or money they put into the project, their incentive to put more than the bare minimum into it is therefore reduced. Until the average consumer can start looking past brand recognition as a primary motivation to spend their money this balance is not going to shift.

    3. Re:This is not going to go well... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      half life could really do with a decent treatment

      Some are speculating that the upcoming District 9 is the half life movie, but they didn't get the rights to actually do halflife.

    4. Re:This is not going to go well... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I agree, there is plenty of decent backstory, I just suspect that either the movie will be about WoW and utterly suck or be about some piece of backstory from warcraft, using WoW only for marketing, and have a chance.

    5. Re:This is not going to go well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No history? Are you insane or just unaware of the fact that WoW builds on YEARS of Warcraft history and storyline?

    6. Re:This is not going to go well... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      In most cases, WoW being one, there isn't even much in the way of "history" going on. The world stays pretty much the same, no matter what you do, the same NPCs show up, with only the occasional prescripted changed. That isn't inspiring material for a movie. At best, they'll pretty much have to make a Warcraft movie and just use WoW as a marketing tie-in.

      It really depends on the angle they take. 99% of game movies I've seen in the past have been gimmicky films designed as a sequential series of scenes where they show off some specific memorable moment from a game, as if all the games players are going to rise up each time and "OMG!!!! THEY HAZ MADE IT IN LIVE ACTION!!! I LOVE MR BOWE!!!!". It never works out that way, but they keep trying nonetheless. Street Fighter the movie was one of the worst I saw in this. They came up with this contrived storyline, tried to shoehorn in every character from the game, and then give every one of them a few minutes to do their special moves from the game (complete with ending scene of them all doing their "victory dance"). All in all, the WRONG way to do a movie.

      However, if they instead took the game to be more like a book, then they might could make something out of it. Despite what you think, the Warcraft series has a HUGE backstory and set of lore to work from. Some of it fleshed out in the games (the earlier Warcraft games, not just WoW), and a lot more of it fleshed out in the various novels that Blizzard has published. All in all it's good material, but condensing it down into film form might be difficult. That itself entails a danger as often there is some feeling that every little detail from a game needs to be worked into the movie. To do it right you just use the game as a springboard for a setting and outline and if something isn't relevant then you don't need to show it.

      All in all, I'll watch it regardless. If it's gimmicky then I'll be disappointed. If however, if it detailed a specific story arc like the original war between the Night Elves and the Burning Legion and the split between the Night and High Elves, then it might turn out good. Another option would be the origins of Medivh and his resulting fall leading to the opening of the Dark Portal and the ensuing war between the humans and orcs. There's good material, but it just depends on how they choose to treat it. Raimi directing does scare me a bit though. I actually liked the Spiderman movies, but I don't think the campy comic book atmosphere will work for Warcraft. Then again the movie might be filled with gnomes with pink pigtails . . .

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:This is not going to go well... by Stele · · Score: 1

      Some are speculating that the upcoming District 9 is the half life movie

      And they would be wrong. The premise of District 9 isn't even close to that of Half Life.

    8. Re:This is not going to go well... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Despite what you think, the Warcraft series has a HUGE backstory and set of lore to work from.

      I'm not sure J.R.R. Tolkien and Michael Moorcock were actually writing with Blizzard in mind.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    9. Re:This is not going to go well... by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is major error in the article title, summary, and even very nearly every article out there on the net. To demonstrate, let's go to the actual source of the information, the Blizzard press release.

      The error is this: the movie is not a World of Warcraft movie. The movie is a Warcraft movie. It's a movie set in the Warcraft universe, not one based on the World of Warcraft game. You're right, out of necessity WoW is fairly static - that's how it is that you have content that's consumed again and again by various and even the same players. However the Warcraft universe is not static.

      Especially if you play through the Warcraft III original and expansion games, you'll discover that Blizzard actually has a real talent for telling a story. They even go so far as to kill or dramatically change major characters. Watch the progression of Arthas from human paladin to undead lieutenant to rogue undead eventually to becoming the Lich King. See how they killed Grom Helscream in an epic battle, or how they killed Sylvanas Windrunner and brought her back as Lady Sylvanas, queen of the rogue undead.

      Blizzard has an extremely rich lore in the Warcraft universe, and this is fertile ground for a movie or even a series of movies. They've already demonstrated their cinematic prowess and story writing abilities in the in-game and pre-rendered cutscenes in Warcraft III and Diablo II. There's no particular reason to think they would do worse than that with a bigger budget associated with a movie.

      A movie based on World of Warcraft would be crap. A movie based on Warcraft though, that has real promise.

    10. Re:This is not going to go well... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Um, did you see it already? Otherwise, I'm not sure how you'd make that claim. Besides, I'm not sure it was the plot exactly so much as the general concept.

    11. Re:This is not going to go well... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      The world stays pretty much the same, no matter what you do, the same NPCs show up, with only the occasional prescripted changed. That isn't inspiring material for a movie.

      It hasn't always been that way, and there's a lore explanation for this. At the start of the World of Warcraft storyline, i.e. after the linear events of Warcraft I II & III, the whole world was put into a time loop by Nozdormu and the Infinite Dragonflight. This was done to trap the Old God C'thun and prevent him from entering the world and destroying it. Some individuals were kept outside of this time loop, in order that heroes could arise that could challenge C'thun and prevent him from entering the world. This gives us the convenient mechanism that you describe for keeping the player as the focus of the game, while the world remains unchanged. We progress through the content, seeing what appears to be an unfolding story.

      As to why the time loop was not ended when the Ahn'Qiraj raid was done, well, I guess even the best laid plans of dragons can go wrong. The world has occasionally lurched forwards in big jump since then - the clearing of Naxxramas, the opening of Outland, and the war in Northrend, but the time loop still re-asserts itself.

      Back to reality, they can avoid this problem entirely by setting the story prior to WoW, and even if they do something more recent then they can just ignore the problem by showing the linear adventure of one person who doesn't happen to go back to the Crossroads and find that Mankrik is still looking for his wife even though he's been told she's dead.

    12. Re:This is not going to go well... by Hobophile · · Score: 1

      The trouble with Warcraft "lore" is that it's an inconsistent grab bag of tropes from popular fantasy, science fiction, and horror. Chris Metzen at least has the good sense to borrow from better authors, but the end result is still derivative well beyond the standard in video games. It's a very good template for Blizzard, which essentially does the same thing with the games as a whole: polish off all the rough edges off original, groundbreaking games, then digest the essence down to mass market pablum.

       

      In the Warcraft 2 era, the result was still somewhat inspired. Over a decade and three World of Warcraft releases later, the cracks are beginning to show. The lore in Wrath of the Lich King reads like bad fan fiction, with only a thin veneer of fantasy lite spackled over sources as inconsistent as Tolkien's Mordor, Norse mythology, and Lovecraft's Elder Gods. Plot continuity is achieved through item progression rather than narrative cohesion, and if the game wasn't a relentless treadmill of unthinking advancement, players would quickly notice that the story makes no sense. As it stands, there's little incentive on either side to care.

    13. Re:This is not going to go well... by Spellvexit · · Score: 1

      If the well-oiled Blizzard marketing machine has its way, it should be a story leading up to the next major expansion. If it were actually well-done, I think it'd be pretty cool. For once it would make me care for the lore and backstory as I scramble my way up to the next level cap!

      While I'm quite skeptical about video game movie adaptations, I'm willing to give Sam Raimi the benefit of the doubt. Blizzard could have done much worse. :^)

      --
      The moon may be smaller than the earth, but it's much farther away!
    14. Re:This is not going to go well... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Actually aside from magic (and Blizzard emphasizes it more much), swords, and orcs, Blizzard's Warcraft setting has very little in common with Tolkein's writings. Unless you want to attribute everything remotely fantasy related, then Warcraft really is it's own story with it's own flavor.

      Just as a measuring, aside from even what's been put out for the games, the Fictional Literature section of Amazon returns 21 novels for the search criteria "warcraft blizzard":

      http://www.amazon.com/s/qid=1248298579/ref=sr_nr_n_3?ie=UTF8&rs=1000&keywords=warcraft%20blizzard&bbn=1000&rnid=1000&rh=n%3A!1000%2Ci%3Astripbooks%2Ck%3Awarcraft%20blizzard%2Cn%3A17

      There's a lot of material out there.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  14. Not all game-to-film movies were bad by darpo · · Score: 0

    Okay, so arguably none of them have been "good", but I can think of a few that were at least okay (and had 5.x or 6.x IMDb ratings): Silent Hill, the Resident Evil movies, Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.

    1. Re:Not all game-to-film movies were bad by casals · · Score: 1

      Suppose - for a moment - that you're right, and they can come with an above-the-average film. "That was awesome, imagine the game" - now, that's the real problem. For Blizzard, profit; for players, hell. The game is already crowded with chinese gold spammers and 12-years-old interested only in killing "the mobs" and getting TEH big badass weapon or so (level 80, of course). Not that liking Counter-Strike genre games is a bad thing; but IMHO when you force your ways into other people, be it in a game or not, it's bad, yes. Today, RP gamers have to flee to less populated RP servers if they want the RP experience they're looking for, since the main ones are already full of people complaining why Blizzard would keep RP servers if everybody knows the only and main purpose in the game is getting to level 80 with epic items, everybody knows that - I've seen some discussions like that already. Well, it's a business, it sells well, nothing wrong with that - but a good movie would only catalyze this very effect, and no more RP gaming. Choosing to stay on a specific MMORPG realm (with its specific problems) is each one's choice, depending on how well one can handle these problems; when you massify something, no matter what your main objective is (usually money), you're probably destroying a particular variation or representation of this something. That goes for games, music, comics, books, history itself. As for me, my bias is obviously towards RP gaming; even if it was not the case, I'd still stick with this line - I even feel sorry for all the hardcore Resident Evil players out there, having to deal with the newborne "specialists" after seeing all the movies about it. Even worse for X-Men people.

      --
      AT &F1DT0,T0800665544 - Real men, real help desk support.
    2. Re:Not all game-to-film movies were bad by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      While I liked the Silent Hill movie and the first Resident Evil one aswell. I thought there wasn't any connection between Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within and any of the Final Fantasy Games. I liked the movie but I thought it was completely disconnected from the games.

    3. Re:Not all game-to-film movies were bad by darpo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the solution for that particular game is to have semi-private servers that are admined by the users themselves. Not roleplaying? You get booted by a user admin.

  15. QUESTION!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never played WoW, does it have as good of a story as the Diablo franchise?

    If not, I'm still waiting for my Diablo movies.

    1. Re:QUESTION!!!! by megamerican · · Score: 1

      It actually has very good story lines. Most of the larger stories are based on the Warcraft RTS games. There are many questlines which have their own unique stories and are definitely worth it.

      I can never stand playing WoW for more than a month or two. After running through the content and storylines it gets quite boring and repetitive. The gameplay itself isn't compelling enough to stay and the PvP is a joke.

      After vanilla WoW there was very little fun to be had in world PvP or in the world at large. Battling for the world bosses, or between tarren mill and southshore were some of the most fun i've had in the game. Not to mention being able to take your own auction house hostage with the mark of shame or bringing a devilsaur from Un'Goro to the crossroads to munch on the lowbies.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    2. Re:QUESTION!!!! by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

      Watch the Cinematics from Diablo II again... they're more coherent and better written than 90% of movies out there.

  16. Don't let him write it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they don't let him write it. They let him write Spider-man 3 and it sucked donkey balls, whereas the first two are fantastic movies. He's a good director, but apparently not so good a writer.

    I don't think WoW has an actually story that would translate to a movie. So whether this thing becomes something worth viewing depends largely on the script, I would imagine.

    1. Re:Don't let him write it by Haiyadragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Anonymous Coward? I swear I didn't check the box. What the hell is going on? I blame...someone else.

  17. "World of" added to summary. by dreemernj · · Score: 4, Informative

    The press release doesn't mention a "World of Warcraft" movie, just a "Warcraft" movie. Perhaps this will be geared towards the more linear storyline of the RTS games?

    --
    1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
    1. Re:"World of" added to summary. by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Even if they call it world of warcraft and just use the settings/characters, it might not suck...

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:"World of" added to summary. by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

      No, the movie will be 80 hours long, where the first 79 hours will be the main characters completing meaningless, pointless tasks like collecting rocks or bird feathers and making absolutely no difference in the lives of anyone they encounter, no matter how many of them complete the tasks they are given.

      The last hour will consist of them all entering a dungeon while they stand around whaling on a "boss" 300 times bigger than any of them, until he finally dies. The last five minutes is them bickering about who gets the loot, and the final climax is the dice role, after which half of them Guild Quit and the guy who won the loot just goes and sells it to a meat vendor.

    3. Re:"World of" added to summary. by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      The cutscenes in WarCraft III were awesome. Cut and paste, Raimi, cut and paste.

    4. Re:"World of" added to summary. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It's going to take place between Wardraft 3 and the beginning of WoW, and it's going to be a war movie building up to sme final confrontation, which suggests it might lean a bit more to Warcraft.

  18. Yellow Oldsmobile by OglinTatas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why can't I ever compose all my thoughts before clicking submit?

    Look for a gnome-engineer-built yellow steampunk Oldsmobile on the streets of Stormwind.

  19. Why WoW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen a synopsis yet, but why World of Warcraft, why not make it about the Warcraft history? If anyone's ever read the lore this game is steeped in it, and I think making a game perhaps based around the third war, or Warcraft III, would make for great story telling and a good movie. I don't really see this getting into theaters(I just can't image it) but I would see it as a direct to DvD.

    1. Re:Why WoW? by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      World of Warcraft and Warcraft share the same lore. Events from the RTS influenced what happened in the MMORPG. The Wrath of the Lich King expansion is fallout from the events of WCIII- The Frozen Throne.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    2. Re:Why WoW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yes, but what I mean is why make it a WoW movie, why not simply tell the lore of Warcraft. That's they unique experience that the Warcraft universe offers, while some games simply have one story, one game to tell it, Warcraft isn't merely just a game, but an entire universe, one which would be told like LoTR

  20. Warcraft Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warcraft Movie not World of Warcraft Movie. Fail.

  21. Not as good as you'll expect. by Sj0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The movie will be 16 hours long and will chronicle the journey of Frank the warrior on his epic quest to gather seventeen moose heads from the moose spawning area. He makes it to level 12, setting the viewer up for the sequel, where he can finally buy new armour and eat the soft banana bread he was previously not battle hardened enough to eat.

    --
    It's been a long time.
    1. Re:Not as good as you'll expect. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      You laugh, but it takes a lot of confidence -- the kind that only comes with lots and lots of experience -- to stick something called a "mana strudel" in your mouth.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Not as good as you'll expect. by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      I suspect the duels where characters run around in circles like they are retarded chimps on acid will be VERY entertaining... Can they have Christopher Walken randomly appear in a village to wipe out all the NPCs because he was bored?

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    3. Re:Not as good as you'll expect. by Haxzaw · · Score: 1

      I suspect the duels where characters run around in circles like they are retarded chimps on acid will be VERY entertaining... Can they have Christopher Walken randomly appear in a village to wipe out all the NPCs because he was bored?

      I was going to mod you funny, but the humor left when you continued the second thought. Why didn't you stop at the ...? Not that it insulted or angered me, the Christopher Walken part just wasn't funny. Sorry, I'll spend my last mod point somewhere else.

    4. Re:Not as good as you'll expect. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but it takes a lot of confidence -- the kind that only comes with lots and lots of experience -- to stick something called a "mana strudel" in your mouth.

      Leading to the epic Dalaran pickup line: "Is that a [Mana Strudel] in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?"

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    5. Re:Not as good as you'll expect. by mw13068 · · Score: 1

      I'm sitting in a conference listening to a presentation, and I read your comment and it caused me to actually LOL. Everyone looked at me...

    6. Re:Not as good as you'll expect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose we should consider the mindless drivel in your critique insightful? Just take the good and don't worry about that bad. We're all friends here, we're not actually trying to turn each other into wonderful writers. Besides, you must admit that if there truly *were* a scene in the WoW movie involving Christopher Walken doing what amounts to Leeroy Jenkins boredom-inspired mass suicide, it'd be a scene that you'd want to see.

  22. This is my epic [Boomstick]! by RealErmine · · Score: 1

    A friend pointed out that this basically guarantees that Bruce Campbell will be involved.

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    1. Re:This is my epic [Boomstick]! by castironpigeon · · Score: 1

      Maybe he'll play Hogger.

      --
      mmmm...forbidden donut
    2. Re:This is my epic [Boomstick]! by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      That would be the movie's only hope of being good. And I mean being good in an Evil Dead 2/Army of Darkness sort of way.

  23. I can see why they chose him... by Starturtle · · Score: 1

    ...Army of Darkness was already half way to being a WoW movie.

  24. Doom movie by peas_n_carrots · · Score: 1

    "does this offer hope that someone might finally make a good movie based on a game IP?"

    Actually I thought Doom was a decent flick. No masterpiece, but it's a "good movie".

  25. Makes sense by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Raimi is WAY past his prime. But then, so is WoW.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  26. Chris Metzen as co-producer by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I find interesting is that Chris Metzen, Blizzard's senior VP of creative development and writer for much of the Warcraft universe is listed as a co-producer of the movie.

    1. Re:Chris Metzen as co-producer by CapnStank · · Score: 1

      I've watched Chris' work since D1. He deserves it.

    2. Re:Chris Metzen as co-producer by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      What I find interesting is that Chris Metzen, Blizzard's senior VP of creative development and writer for much of the Warcraft universe is listed as a co-producer of the movie.

      Metzen is the chief Loremaster at Blizzard, I'd be amazed if he wasn't closely involved.

  27. If he's smart about it by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Which it is almost a foregone conclusion that he won't be, he'd take the story line of Warcraft 2 or maybe Warcraft 3 and adapt it under a different title.

    1. Re:If he's smart about it by ifrag · · Score: 1

      I think Warcraft 3 is the best bet for a plot-line to use. It's set out in the most logical pattern and tells a naturally flowing story. The prior games were a bit unclear on how everything tied together depending on what side you happen to be playing, or if the one side of the story even happened at all. Warcraft 3 is fairly definite as all roads lead to the big tree, and as far as scenes I'd like to watch in cinema, hordes of undead storming the 3 allied races is fairly high on my list. Probably similar to the battle at helm's deep, only more spread out and smaller forts/keeps etc.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
  28. Not just WoW.. by murphyd311 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's just titled Warcraft. Remember those RTS games and books? I'll pretend it's based on those instead of WoW.

    Though a character named 'Leroy Jenkins' would be hilarious.

    1. Re:Not just WoW.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it really fucking wouldn't. I'm from LS, the server Leroy and his asshat guildies played on. They were a bunch of forum trolls who prided themselves over posting racist shit all the time, nothing more. They were a second-rate guild at best, and leroy was in particularly a nobody even among them, until they staged their video and posted it on the LS forums.

      At that point, all the retarded kids of WoW picked it up and ran with it, because it was OH SO LULZY. P4L (leroy's guidl) was a bunch of racist WoW forum trolls, and all of you idiots who spout that overused, underfunny meme are just doing them more service. The icing on the cake is, of course, Blizzard themselves buying into the hype. As much as I didn't like them, P4L accomplished the biggest WoW troll ever: getting famous even inside the game, despite acting like total trash.

    2. Re:Not just WoW.. by Aelyew · · Score: 1

      Leroy Jenkins was from EQ, although Blizz does have the new achievement for this dubious honor as an homage. I wouldn't expect to see that character in a WoW movie.

  29. game-based movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't like Bergman's The Seventh Seal?

  30. I'm a -rogue- by dhermann · · Score: 1

    Quick! Someone book all the Wayans brothers for other engagements during filming so there's no chance they'll be cast as lovable, doofus sidekicks to the 20-year-old white kid!

  31. I hope they take a bit of creative liberty by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Else we'll get to see something like this:

    Young Grurk is a hunter of his tribe, and he's set out to conquer the world. He meets some old leader of his tribe who proceeds to tell Grurk his life story, giving the watcher of the show a chance to head back to the lobby to get himself some treats. Then Grurk heads out to collect a few apples, fishes or Murlocheads for his Elder. On his way, he meets the token cleric who has essentially been given the same task, but they both choose to ignore each other. Grurk finally makes his way to great Orkgrimmar, where some other Elder tells him his life story (time for a piss break), then sends Grurk out to collect cactus apples, sea shells or Murlokfins (but of course from different Murloks, else it would get boring, right?). He meets some other people who do essentially the same drag he does, but again, everyone is ignoring everyone else.

    Let's fast forward, the story doesn't really changes aside of the crap Grurk is gathering.

    He finally arrives at some cave, some temple, some place of importance, where someone big bad is lurking inside. Suddenly Grurk acknowledges the existance of the Cleric (who is still doing essentially the same he does, just a bit slower) and they both start yelling and searching for a mighty warrior to join them in their quest to clean that temple of evil, while Mages and Rogues dance around them, trying to incite them to be taken along (but who needs them). They finally grudgingly agree to take the Mage along, but first he has to treat them to a feast.

    Eventually they find the mighty warrior and they set out to conquer the temple. A lot of fights ensue, often their life is at stake and more often than not one of our heroes manages to save the day. Until the Warrior finally blinks, tells the rest "sorry, mom called, gotta mow the lawn" and vanishes into a puff of smoke.

    Our heroes unwrap their porting stones and soon they find themselves in one of the local taverns. Fade out, more in the sequel.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I hope they take a bit of creative liberty by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Please. As soon as the warrior and the cleric got together, they'd tell Grurk to take a hike and team up with the mage and the rogue. Who wants a hunter in their party?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  32. Blizzard has some experience by rxan · · Score: 1

    I don't know if Blizzard has anything to do with the movie other than as a content source. But they already have experience in this area. The Diablo I and II cinematics and plot were well done. Same with the Warcraft 3 cinematics. Warcraft 2's movies were pretty gimmicky though.

    I have hope, it could actually go well.

    1. Re:Blizzard has some experience by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you ask me, a Diablo movie would be heaps more interesting. If done right, with good SFX, this would blow the snot out of so many other fantasy-action movies that managed to make it to the big screen lately.

      The story is right there in Diablo II, all you have to do is take it and run with it, collect a party of various fighters and let it roll.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Blizzard has some experience by rxan · · Score: 1

      Loved the ending of Diablo II!

  33. Hey I've got an idea! by Garbad+Ropedink · · Score: 1

    Here's a great idea. Let's take a medium like video games; that works extremely well for a specific method of storytelling which deeply immerses the player, and shoehorn it into another medium like say film. Which to date hasn't been able to adapt a single video game story into anything other than a fiasco.

    --
    And that was the last Terry Fox run I ever participated in.
    1. Re:Hey I've got an idea! by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Which to date hasn't been able to adapt a single video game story into anything other than a fiasco.

      I personally quite enjoyed the Super Mario Brothers movie.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Hey I've got an idea! by Garbad+Ropedink · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along these lines... http://pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF213-Mario_Too.jpg

      --
      And that was the last Terry Fox run I ever participated in.
  34. Suggested Tagline by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "How does one kill that which has no life?"

    P.

    1. Re:Suggested Tagline by Krneki · · Score: 1

      You fear him off the cliff.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    2. Re:Suggested Tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WoW nerd response...

      Actually, fear won't send him over the cliff. You would have to use Mind Control. :P

    3. Re:Suggested Tagline by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Argh, you are right. :)

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    4. Re:Suggested Tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You fear him off the cliff.

      Somewhat offtopic: How the hell did the verb "fear" ever acquire this meaning in WoW? That's a rhetorical question, but c'mon, "to fear something" already had a standard English meaning; it means that you're afraid of it. You'd think that being feared by your enemies would be a good thing. Every time the game tells me that an enemy fears me, I just have to say to myself, "I guess I'm so happy to be this terrifying that I'm running around like an idiot."

    5. Re:Suggested Tagline by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 0

      How the hell did the verb "fear" ever acquire this meaning in WoW?

      In WoW, fear is one of the spells you can cast. I suppose OP could have said "Cast a fear spell on him so he runs off the cliff", but most WoW players will understand that what they meant from the context of the sentence.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    6. Re:Suggested Tagline by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It's caused by how the verbing of a noun usually means "to apply [noun]" or "turn him into [noun]".

      In 50 years, English will only consist of nouns, and verbs will be simple conjugations of those nouns.

  35. Why watch it... by yogibaer · · Score: 1

    when you can live it...

    1. Re:Why watch it... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because we might end up with a bit less of "carry X to Y and bring back some Murlokfins", and a bit more of a heroic story?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Why watch it... by yogibaer · · Score: 1

      Or you might end up with Bruce Campbell (uncredited) wielding a chain saw/shotgun/battle axe in an orc/elf/dwarf costume. (With and without a shirt)

    3. Re:Why watch it... by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0

      I would actually pay to watch that movie.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  36. A film first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It'll be told almost entirely in flashbacks to reproduce the grind experience to cater to the hardcore fans. There are plans to do a 10 minute edited version for the non fans

  37. SAM RAIMITO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for those of you that read the article, who is Sam RAIMITO?

  38. Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by sgant · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You know what, I'm boycotting any movie from now on that's "based" on anything. Be it a book or a comic or a TV Show or video game or a "reboot" of an old movie series or remake of an old movie or whatever. Give me something original.

    Come on...I'd take a "Pan's Labyrinth" or "In Bruges" or "WALL-E" over a "Transformers 1 or 2" or "Batman _____(insert verb here)" or "Warcraft: The Movie".

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

      Come on...I'd take a "Pan's Labyrinth" or "In Bruges" or "WALL-E" over a "Transformers 1 or 2" or "Batman _____(insert verb here)" or "Warcraft: The Movie".

      Did you actually _see_ Batman: The Dark Knight? That's easily the best movie on your list, and one of the best movies in recent years.

    2. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by navygeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good luck seeing any movies in the next...ever. I'm not even trying to be cynical. It's a simple fact that everything is a rehash of something else. A good portion of the original Star Trek episodes were takes of various Shakespeare plays. The original Battlestar Galactica was mostly re-tellings of various movie plot lines. I took a lit class in college years ago and the prof said something that's stuck with me since - there are only 7 original plot lines to a narrative/story, everything else just changes setting and mixes up the characters a bit. Now, take that with a grain of salt, as I have no links to support that claim.

    3. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Poster: Do Something Original!

    4. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Informative

      I took a lit class in college years ago and the prof said something that's stuck with me since - there are only 7 original plot lines to a narrative/story, everything else just changes setting and mixes up the characters a bit.

      Are you sure you're not mixing that up with conflicts?

      Man vs. Man
      Man vs. Society
      Man vs. Himself
      Man vs. Nature
      Man vs. The Supernatural
      Man vs. Technology
      Man vs... err... bugger all. Can't remember.

      Seems to me you can get more than 7 plots just using combinations of these.

    5. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by navygeek · · Score: 1

      I did not, I am just relaying what I was told. The prof might have, however. As I said, I have no evidence to support the claim, so I'm more than willing to concede something got garbled in transmission.

    6. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Or things could have changed since I took lit, since nothing is sacred these days. :)

      If they can declare pluto not a planet, I'm sure they can pigeonhole 50 combinations of conflicts into 7 plots. ;)

    7. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by khellendros1984 · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Rags to Riches
      2. Overcoming the Monster
      3. The Quest
      4. Voyage and Return
      5. Comedy
      6. Tragedy
      7. Rebirth
      Basically, it's 7 *categories* of plot, identified by Shakespeare. I don't have examples for any of them, but some of them are self-evident from their names, I think.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    8. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      This should all be fairly obvious. Honestly when was the last time you saw a movie that had a twist or plot event that you hadn't already guessed was going to happen.

    9. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In fact, there's an old saying that there are actually only two stories: hero goes on a journey and stranger comes to town. Who originally said it, I have no idea; I just put a cursory look and can't seem to find any credible evidence for a first known printing.

      For anybody interested in the topic, I recommend reading "The Hero with a Thousand Faces," which is an incredible work in comparative mythology and literature.

    10. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suggestion: when you attempt to make an argument, never preface it with "I took a ___ class in college years ago..."

    11. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by OglinTatas · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man vs. Man - PvP
      Man vs. Society - RP
      Man vs. Himself - I have a paper due tomorrow, but my guild is raiding Ulduar
      Man vs. Nature - PvE
      Man vs. The Supernatural - God says that j.o. to my dancing naked night elf bank alt is a PERVERSION!!
      Man vs. Technology - Patch Tuesday
      Man vs... err... bugger all. Can't remember. - Alzheimers

      Yeah, that about covers it.

    12. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by sgant · · Score: 1

      There's an Oscar that's awarded each year to 5 original screenplays. "Pan's Labyrinth", "WALL-E" and "In Bruges" were all nominated for it as are many others. Original movies are out there...but they're buried under the reboots, remakes, based-on-the-popular-comic, sequels and all the others.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    13. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you could also get into Vladimer Propp's Morphology of the Folk Tale to identify the functions within the stories themselves

      I am, however, with the parent post on this one... enough with the remake of the remake of the remake already! When I can see almost any movie trailer and mentally list off the entire genealogy of which prior films it is either: imitating, ripping off completely, remaking, retelling, or is in any manner just a bad carbon copy...

      Don't even start with the inane remakes of old television shows. Bewitched? Land of the Lost? Oh come on...

    14. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a documentary. Where does that fall into?

    15. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just accidentally summarize the bible in 7 bullet points?

    16. Re:Dear Hollywood: DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are only 7 original plot lines to a narrative/story, everything else just changes setting and mixes up the characters a bit.

      Nope, sorry. In fact, there's only one.

      And here's the one and only plotline: There's some people in some situation. Something happens. There's a result.

      The point being that by abstracting, you can get 300 different plotlines, 7 different plotlines or 1 only plotline. Exploring narrative similarities is indeed interesting and worthwile, but it does not lead to absolutes of "different plotlines". Of course, you are right in impying that it does not lead to the destruction of originality either. Originality lies within the correct mix.

  39. Legend of the Seeker by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    Raimi also produces the Legend of the Seeker tv series. Make of THAT what you will!

    1. Re:Legend of the Seeker by psychicninja · · Score: 1

      Raimi also produces the Legend of the Seeker tv series. Make of THAT what you will!

      Two things:

      1. 'Produces' (actually, co-produces) != has a strong hand in the art direction, storyline, acting, etc. thereof
      2. I actually like this show. It's reminiscent of the old Hercules and Xena shows, though not quite as quirky. For a TV fantasy show it has a few things going for it: very accessible plot, attractive females, and respectable fight choreography to name a few.

    2. Re:Legend of the Seeker by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I am mesmerized by tit bouncing on horseback. There I admit it.

    3. Re:Legend of the Seeker by melikamp · · Score: 1

      The only good thing about the Seeker, imho, is the wizard played by Bruce Spence. OK, and the fact that every female is wearing a corset. If the two leads were replaced by inflatable dolls and the script by pressure cooking instructions, the overall quality would not suffer significantly.

    4. Re:Legend of the Seeker by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      My wife occasionally watches this show when she can and it's sounded horrible from my spot at the computer. I've got some of the books so hopefully I can get her to read them some time and recant her positive outlook of the show. First she insists on finishing all the Shanara books.

    5. Re:Legend of the Seeker by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Yes of course producing is not equal to directing, however if you read interviews with Raimi (even glance over the wikipedia page on LotS for instance) you'll see that he has played a large role in the show (in many aspects--from the business end obviously as executive producer, but also down to plot decisions etc) from the creation stage on.

      I also do agree that it's not horrible... I mean, as a fan of the books, I feel somewhat betrayed, but if you can get past the canon-rape and just view it as a generic fantasy tv series, it's entertaining. Thus my "Make of THAT what you will"

    6. Re:Legend of the Seeker by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Yes, that was some inspired casting, I agree.

    7. Re:Legend of the Seeker by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I think Spence tends to sound like fozzy bear..

    8. Re:Legend of the Seeker by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Forget any connections to the book and look at it as a kind of generic pulp fantasy serial and it's not as bad. Entertaining even.

  40. I hope this movie doesn't suck like.... by ITJC68 · · Score: 1

    Doom. That movie just plain awful. I like the rock and his movies but this one should never have gotten off the ground. I look forward to this movie as a player of WOW.

    1. Re:I hope this movie doesn't suck like.... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I on the other hand, really enjoyed the Doom movie.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  41. Re:I can see why they chose him... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Army of Darkness was closer to a Diablo movie than a WoW movie, if we have to stay in Blizzard's IP...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. Sam to Direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sam Raimi... not a bad pick of a director, don't really care for the spider-man movies as much as I do for the Evil Dead Trilogy :D

    Wish they would've gotten Sam Raimi to direct The Last Airbender movie instead of M. Night Shyamalan... oh well... What a Twist!

  43. Warcraft movie...not world of by grocer · · Score: 1

    Sooooo, they can take all three games and make three movies...then reboot the series with new characters from the World of Warcraft campaigns...sooooo...Blizzards trying to launch a big ol' movie cash cow that will last for a decade. I think the Lord of the Rings set a pretty high bar for fantasy films with the sticking point being characters.

  44. Realist by _bug_ · · Score: 1

    While it's still early in the process, does this offer hope that someone might finally make a good movie based on a game IP?

    preemptive TL;DR: No.

    The breadth of the Warcraft lore makes it impossible to fit even a small percent of it into a single movie. And Blizzard will certainly want to tie the movie into the game somehow, which will only hinder the creativity of whoever is tasked with writing the screenplay. There will probably be an overabundance of cheesy in-jokes to target the gamers, but will just come off as stupid to the average viewer. Visually it will almost certainly look nothing like the CG cut-scenes in Warcraft 3 or World of Warcraft, which is exactly what gamers of WoW will be expecting.

    And the final nail in the coffin: This is the same guy who directed Spiderman 3. Imagine Thrall doing the emo dance.

  45. Sam by NekoXP · · Score: 1

    Who's Sam Raimito?:D

  46. Thumbs up, let's do this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starring Bruce Campbell as Leeroy Jenkins.

    Good? Bad? Least I've got chicken.

  47. LEEEEROOOOY! by ZenDragon · · Score: 1

    I will only watch it if it features a cameo by LeeeeeRoooooooy!!! haha

  48. Forget WoW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make a Starcraft movie! Come on, it has everything--love interest between Kerrigan and Raynor, cloaking spies with the power to call down nuclear strikes, nasty alien monsters, mysterious -other- aliens, and stuff blowing up all over the place!

  49. Good? Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't make a good movie from a shitstain of a game.

  50. Greaaat.... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    From Horde Commander: You must stop the Alliance from advancing on our position!

    From Horde Hero: Uh.. quest is still red.. LOL! kk.. where?

    From Horde Commander: You must journey in to the Barrens and stop their march from Ashenvale!

    From Horde Hero: LOL! kk.. I accept.

    From Horde Hero Buddy: Ya mon.. share kk?

    From Horde Hero: LOL too low of lvl!

    From Horde Hero Buddy: LOL mon!

    From Horde Hero: All 80s! LOL!

    *SPLAT*

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  51. Script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *deep announcer voice*
    Four young boys embark on an epic journey to overthrow the evil tyranny of the nameless one. Gathering experience through tireless boar killing training, they prepare for the final challenge; defeating the nameless one. Join these adventurers on a journey through Blackrock Mountain where they meet a close friend Leeroy, who promptly runs off a cliff into a large pool of lava. LEEROYYYY echoes off the chamber walls. Follow closely as resources run thin and they begin to turn on each other ... will more Hot Pockets and Mtn Dew ever be found?!
    Rtards beware! The journey is near endless and the nameless one wields a sword of infallible power! Will these young boys be able to complete their quest?! Azeroth is not prepared!
    Due for release early 2018 ...
    *end announcer voice*
    Also, I heard Spiders were involved...everyone loves spiders. Like in that movie where a man is kinda like a spider...I think it was called The Fly...or something along those lines.

  52. Solo, Normal, Heroic Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch it by yourself, it's a pretty good movie.

    If you watch it with four or nine friends, it's a really good movie.

    If you watch it with 24 friends, it is a fantastic movie.

  53. I'll watch it for... by lymond01 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:I'll watch it for... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Ted Raimi will play the part of Leroy Jenkins

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  54. Good movie based on a game IP by roskakori · · Score: 1

    [D]oes this offer hope that someone might finally make a good movie based on a game IP?

    A good movie based on MMORPG game IP has already been made: Ben X revolves around the game Archlord and the real life of some players. Think Rainman meets WoW.

  55. Leeroy Jenkins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leeerooooy Jenkins!!!

  56. South Park already did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    South Park already did this about the only way it would be watchable, as a satire of WoW gamers. A "serious" WoW movie would be dreadfully dull.

  57. I'm thinking... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking it'll probably end up like this.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  58. Movie Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about two gnomes who find a bracelet of power, and they have to take it to the Burning Steppes and cast it into the Cauldron.
    They form the Brotherhood of the Bracelet. Along the way they're trailed by a murloc named Gottom, who's obsessed with the bracelet, and nine bracelet bogeymen.
    It could be a three-parter, called 'Ruler of the Bracelet'.
    The first part would be called 'The Brotherhood of the Bracelet',
    followed by 'A Couple of Towers',
    with the climactic ending called 'Hey, the King's Back!'

    1. Re:Movie Plot by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      MOD UP! (the cauldron is also in Searing Gorge, further adding to the hilarity).

      --
      Interesting.
    2. Re:Movie Plot by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      MOD UP! (the cauldron is also in Searing Gorge, further adding to the hilarity).

      It's actually one of the jokes you can tell if you type /joke in the game console.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    3. Re:Movie Plot by SilverEyes · · Score: 1

      MOD UP! (the cauldron is also in Searing Gorge, further adding to the hilarity).

      It's actually one of the jokes you can tell if you type /joke in the game console.

      I... am aware of this :)

      http://www.wowwiki.com/Jokes

      I just tried to point out the little bit of irony.

      --
      Interesting.
  59. Real Plot for movie *spoilers* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what i am willing to bet the farm on being the story....

    "Movie opens with a guy buying some redbull at the store, talking to hsi freind how excited he is to be raiding icecrown tonight. they also get some cheetos and buritos, altho none of them are fat. They than goto his basement and they start showing all the people over vent and stuff that make up the raid, 5 of them are in his basement, one is a very cute nerdy chick who none of them relise is a hottie. A TERRIBLE lightning storm comes into town as they are clearning trash and a direct hit to the house and lights go out. Next scene we find our heros sitting outside of a small shack in a town they dont reconise....and blah blah blah they have to help some guy fight the evil horde *(which i think is bias, why not make a horde movie, the alliance are tools anyways) and help save the kingdom of stormwind. Oh and along the way the chick becomes some total hottie that the lead falls in love with after she falls for the main human guy from the wow world."

    Send me my check please blizzard...k thanks!

  60. Who? Sam Raimi? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    What, was Uwe Boll too busy?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  61. Leroy Jerkins! by GerardAtJob · · Score: 1

    Plz give a role to Leroy Jerkins!!
    After a question in Jeopardy, we need him into this film!

    --
    I can't call that English ;-)
  62. IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last count, my bookshelf had 11 paperbacks from the Warcraft universe. All of which fall in with the story in the various Warcraft games. I'm fairly certain they can pull 2 hours of movie from there and make it entertaining to watch. The content is there.

    The funding is there too. Blizzard brings in nearly 2 Billion USD a year in WoW subscription fees alone. Not to mention merchandise, account changes that require money and the game/expansions themselves that cost money to buy.

    I'm sure Bliz will look at it as an investment, too. Those people who were on the fence about playing the game might just do so if the movie is made well enough. Not to mention the additional Merch they might sell with tie-ins. (World of Warcraft Mountain Dew anyone?)

    Do I expect this to be an Oscar winner? Maybe if the score or special effects are well done, they'll have a chance at one of those fluke ones that get mentioned while going into commercials.
    Do I expect it to be better than all this other garbage we're getting now in the wake of the writers strike? Hands-down, yes. Not because I'm a fanboi or anything, but simply because the rest of the stuff out there now is just recycled garbage. This summer specifically has been a terrible season at the box office compared to what was expected. Here's hoping GI Joe will turn it around, though the trailers have me weary.

  63. Lets make it a Hercules/Xena reunion by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    Like someone said - Bruce will most likely have some role if you get him out of Miami for a bit. But really with Herc/Xena under his belt, this should be old hat for Sam. Just a matter of making the right phone calls to get all the old people back together in some new roles (cameos or main) (RIP Kevin Smith :(

    Ted Raimi as Topper McNabb
    Lucy Lawless as Jana Proudmore
    Renee O'Connor as the head chick in Darnassus
    Hudson Leick as human female character in just their underwear
    etc...

    I wonder how many reviews will compare it to LotR - Orcs vs Men, albeit with the Orcs being more of a proper character instead of just generic bad guys.

  64. Grind by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1

    I doubt it will be as much of a grind as sitting through Transformers 2.

  65. Raimi's the man by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    He practically invented the badass heroe. Shotgun and chainsaw anyone?

    Expect broken mirrors, silly jokes, weird camera angles and cameos of Bruce Campbell and his Oldsmobile Delta 88 (although I'm not sure how he's going to include it in a WarCraft movie)

    BTW, the article doesn't specify that it's World of Warcraft, just that it happens in the Warcraft universe. I know this is /. but the editors or the poster could actually read the title of TFA.

  66. The Theme isn't what you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't what you think. It's going to be a heart-felt story about little Jimmy's hard road out of internet gaming addiction. He gets the shakes when it's raid day and he can't get online anymore. He gets sunburned as his skin isn't ready for sunlight after years living in his parent's basement. Eventually he utters his first word that isn't some form of leet-speak or wow-talk and his parents cry as they can understand him for the first time in years.

  67. Re:... Film from a game... (Silent Hill) by Franklin+Brauner · · Score: 1

    I too liked the Silent Hill movie. I found it captured the look and feel of the game, and enjoyed that they weren't so bound by canon in the adaptation. I've never felt like I was so trapped in a fever dream before in a movie. It was like a European art film masquerading as a Hollywood movie -- maybe that's why it worked for me.

  68. Movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope it doesn't turn out to be another Max Payne!!

  69. get weta involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i saw these actions scenes when it was called Lord of the Rings

  70. insert VERB! by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    he specifically asked to insert a verb, so The Dark Knight is excluded... anyway, I respectfully disagree. Haven't watched in Bruges, Transformers 1 was adequately funny, 2 was a piece of crap, but both Wall-E and Pan's Labyrinth are excellent movies, at least as good as TDK, and possibly better. For once they actually make sense whereas TDK not always does so.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  71. People will watch/buy it if... by Guppy · · Score: 1

    Regardless of the quality, I'm sure they'll be able to get people to watch the movie (or buy the DVD), if they include a code for a sufficiently nifty in-game item as a premium.

    If they have a different premium for movie and DVD, I'm sure you'll be able to get people to do both. Or hey, how about multiple collector versions of the DVD...

  72. It would have to be a parody by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Now, a movie that I would see. People getting ganked for begging. Gold farmers going toe to toe with legitimate people. Constant bitching between peasants. Parties falling apart because the only tank as to go clean his room.

    It would be a riot.

  73. Re:Dear Hollywood.. Or at least a book? by autoevolution · · Score: 1

    And hire a good director, like blade runner. Also: scale models > computer graphics. Unless the entire movie is computer graphics, then it is acceptable.

  74. Uwe Boll FTW!!! by TheGrapeApe · · Score: 1

    They should let Uwe Boll direct it, just for the hilarity of watching him box everyone that hates it.

  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. My boomstick indeed by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

    So Sam's making a movie based on a game that quotes one of his own most famous lines. I've nothing insightful to add here, i just found that funny and a little strange. It'll never happen, but i wouldn't mind Mr. Campbell with a shotgun in there somewhere....

  77. Will it have Barrens chat? by clovis · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping it will have the chat scrolling on the left side of the screen.
    WooHoo! 2.5 hours of replaying old Barrens chat from the server logs.

  78. Meh by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    I am a long time WoW player and a RPG nut and this doesn't interest me in the slightest. Not really sure why but as much as I like playing WoW, the so-called storyline is sadly lacking, and where it is thick enough to actually involve yourself it is uniformly bad. That said, when I get done posting here and checking my email, I'm gonna login and check my AH toon, and run some daily quests.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  79. Re:Dear Hollywood.. Or at least a book? by sesshomaru · · Score: 1


    Unless the entire movie is computer graphics, then it is acceptable.

    Well, if that's your poison, then you need to know, even the undead fear... The Goon!

    Oh, and also, kawaii.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  80. Sam Raimi To Direct World of Warcraft Movie by Mortgage · · Score: 0

    We can all live in hope!

  81. Picking Villains by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    This requires picking of villains in a way not to alienate half your audience.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  82. I'll watch it if... by krakround · · Score: 1

    Leroy Jenkins is the protagonist.

  83. As in all... by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    As in all mainstream Sam Raimi movies, Bruce Campbell will have a breif cameo. He's rumored to be playing Leeroy Jenkins.

    --
    This sig is false.
  84. Re:Who? Sam Raimi? by mcvos · · Score: 1

    What, was Uwe Boll too busy?

    He was very explicitly denied the right to make this movie because he sucks. Or so Blizzard said.