Slashdot Mirror


Is Typing Ruining Your Ability To Spell?

NSN A392-99-964-5927 writes "My handwriting abilities have deteriorated over the years. Putting a real pen to paper, I get frustrated over how to spell correctly, as I am so accustomed to using a keyboard and knowing where the letters are. Having spoken to a few friends, I've found that this has become apparent to them, too. I've noticed that my grammar is also affected; maybe this is because I spent too much time on IRC and lowered my standards. Hand-written words are now becoming obsolete. There is often no need to think about writing anymore, or about how something is spelled. Are other Slashdotters having the same problem? (I'm used to Telex machines, which should give you an indication of how old I am.)"

494 comments

  1. I don't know, but... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...using a spelling-correcting keyboard has made my typing skills deteriorate noticeably. It's especially noticeable when I'm trying to use vi.

    1. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a spelling-correcting keyboard? I've heard of programs that correct spelling, but not keyboards...

    2. Re:I don't know, but... by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's why I've always maintained correct/proper capitalization and grammar and compete sentences, even in IMs and IRC chats. In fact, it actually slows me down when I have to purposely corrupt a text message in order to reduce its size (such as on Twitter or SMS).

      --
      Harold
    3. Re:I don't know, but... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I haven't encountered any spelling or grammar problems myself, but the handwriting has gone completely bonkers, but it has never been any good.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:I don't know, but... by linebackn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I couldn't live without it, butt my spiel cheekier can old dew so much.

    5. Re:I don't know, but... by larien · · Score: 4, Informative
      Working in a large business where writing professional emails helps as well; I purposely try to use proper capitilisation and punctuation as required.

      That said, I rarely write anything these days and it's often just a scrawl when I do. My writing was never up to much anyway, without practice it's deteriorated.

    6. Re:I don't know, but... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

      I haven't encountered any spelling or grammar problems myself, but the handwriting has gone completely bonkers, but it has never been any good.

      And I've noticed the opposite....my hand-writing has gotten much better because I'm more careful now, since I don't use it very much at all.

      As far as spelling goes, how can you not learn to spell more correctly, as auto-correcting features SHOW you how to correctly spell what you're trying to spell?

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    7. Re:I don't know, but... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I know my hand starts to hurt if I have to write more than a couple of paragraphs by hand.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:I don't know, but... by winkydink · · Score: 5, Funny

      capitalization is especially important - consider the sentence:

      i helped my uncle jack off a horse

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    9. Re:I don't know, but... by ByOhTek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe he's using one of those hackable Mac keyboard with all the spare storage and processing?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    10. Re:I don't know, but... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's especially noticeable when I'm trying to use vi.

      It automatically changes vi to vim?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:I don't know, but... by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I find I get my grammar practice by writing my blog (so, it might suck but I don't think it's gotten any worse), and spell checkers tend to aid me with my occasional spelling issues. My cursive has never been particularly readable, and my print is usually all caps. I scream when I write in print.

      I'm one of those people that refuses to sacrifice proper English when I Tweet or text. If I'm running out of space, I'll start by doing number words to numbers (eg, "1" instead of "one"), and "and"s to "&". If I'm still running out of space, I'll do my damnedest to rephrase my thought into a smaller sentence or sacrifice superfluous words. I will break messages up into multiple messages rather than resort to anything resembling "leet speak" (with the rare exceptions of using "lol" - there's a fine line between "common shorthand" and "leet speak" that I will not cross).

    12. Re:I don't know, but... by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This whole topic doesn't make much sense to me. A word is spelled the same way, whether you're writing it or typing it; a properly phrases sentence doesn't change based on the medium in which it is written.

    13. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lolwut

      noob

    14. Re:I don't know, but... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1, Redundant

      No, that would be up to ln -s /usr/bin/vim /usr/bin/vi.

    15. Re:I don't know, but... by Chrisje · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I never, ever use a spell-checker. Be it in Dutch, German, English or Scandinavian, I'll always consult an old-fashioned dictionary if I don't know how to spell a particular word.

      But ultimately when it comes to spelling, grammar and general eloquence, there's simply no substitute for erudition. An erudite individual will have a better grasp of language.

    16. Re:I don't know, but... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1, Redundant

      As far as spelling goes, how can you not learn to spell more correctly, as auto-correcting features SHOW you how to correctly spell what you're trying to spell?

      In deed. May spelling know is match better then be four eye cute relay on the computer too Czech it.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    17. Re:I don't know, but... by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm a serial comma fanatic:
      To my parents, Anne Rand and God.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    18. Re:I don't know, but... by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, that's pretty much how it's worked out for me, too. I even have difficulty signing my name sometimes, but that's mostly because cursive is my most unpracticed form. (I really admire some of the cursive scripts some folks are able to produce. My parents have wonderful cursive handwriting, so it boggles my mind that mine is so illegible!) One reasons I've maintained proper punctuation (and grammar and capitalization) -- or attempted to, anyway -- is because I fancy myself a writer, even if the vast majority of my writing is actually done through forum posts. Someday I'll get it together and write a novel, and when that day comes I want to be well-practice in my typing skills (so as not to detract from the narrative). I don't want to get into the habit of "sloppy" writing.

      --
      Harold
    19. Re:I don't know, but... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      That's why I've always maintained correct/proper capitalization and grammar and compete sentences, even in IMs and IRC chats. In fact, it actually slows me down when I have to purposely corrupt a text message in order to reduce its size (such as on Twitter or SMS).

      I've never been much good at spelling/punctuation/grammar... Which is especially shameful because I really enjoy reading and have an ex-English teacher for a mother...

      But I still try to maintain correct capitalization, grammar, spelling, etc. in anything where I've got a chance to actually think about what I'm writing. Forum posts, documentation, email... Anything like that.

      IMs and IRC I don't worry so much about.

      My handwriting has always been crap. I never really learned cursive, always printed instead. I don't think the quality of my penmanship has diminished any... But I do find myself frustrated at how long it takes to actually produce a written document.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    20. Re:I don't know, but... by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I worked in a group email response department and spent the majority of my day writing emails. Writing emails all day greatly improved my ability to bang out very long, concise and grammatically correct emails over and over.

      My handwriting has withered into a scratch that even I myself cannot read on some days. I recently returned to college and found myself desiring better note taking skills, but my penmanship is just too poor that I have resorted to taping lectures.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    21. Re:I don't know, but... by TheEldest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The OP didn't say he relies on spellcheck, but that his fingers know how to spell when his head doesn't.

      I've got the same problem. Words like receive are no problem when I'm typing, but if I put pen to paper, I need to stop and think. When many people type, they think the word, not the letter. Their hands put the words from thought to type with no intermediate thought needed.

      I spell by muscle memory, not thought. I'm sure the same works for people who write all the time. The pen just makes the words they need.

      So how about you get off your high horse, read what the OP actually said instead of what you thought he said, and fuck off.

    22. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      italization is especially important - consider the sentence:

      i helped my uncle jack off a horse

      Tsk, tsk. It's OK, though. Based on your previous /. posts, we figured out that you really meant:

      "I helped my uncle jerk off a horse."

    23. Re:I don't know, but... by somersault · · Score: 1

      An erudite individual will have a better grasp of language.

      And pretty soon nobody else will know what he's saying :p

      I usually use google's define: function when I want to check the meaning or spelling of a word.

      As for the article, I don't see why typing would ruin the ability to spell. It means that when it comes to writing for the first time in a while it feels pretty weird, and easy to cramp up if you're going to do a lot of writing.. but why would it stop your ability to spell?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    24. Re:I don't know, but... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      An erudite individual will have a better grasp of language.

      They are also adept at casting magical spells, or so I'm told.

    25. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a grammar fanatic and that's an incomplete sentence!

    26. Re:I don't know, but... by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 1

      I'm going to follow you on Twitter just because of this post. I'm not kidding, either -- I'm also one of "those people".

      --
      Harold
    27. Re:I don't know, but... by nortcele · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Amen. Preach it! I also don't participate in the 'leetspeak'. I backspace to correct spellings as I notice them and attempt to use full length words with correct grammar. If one can type even a reasonable speed, it takes very little extra effort. (At the same time it can also indicate to others you probably don't have baggy pants showing your underwear, untied sneakers, spray can in one hand, and your hat on backwards.) It's just my personal preference, and messages that use good grammar tend to get a mental +1 from me. Your messages (email, IM, IRC, etc) are the "visual" by which others perceive you, so it can only be a help to yourself to always put the best foot forward.

    28. Re:I don't know, but... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      well, it does assume to require some level of intelligence. :P

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    29. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean: Ayn Rand?

    30. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My hovercraft is full of eels!

    31. Re:I don't know, but... by ender- · · Score: 1

      An erudite individual will have a better grasp of language.

      And pretty soon nobody else will know what he's saying :p

      And he'll sound pompous and faggy.

    32. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You leave out the Oxford comma! "To my parents, Anne Rand, and God." See the difference? How can you be a comma fanatic without the Oxford comma?

    33. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In deed. May spelling know is match better then be four eye cute relay on the computer too Czech it.

      I love that one!

      I hate auto-correcting features for that exact reason. They often change a word into something different and I end up writing stuff which has nothing to do with the original "misspelled" word

    34. Re:I don't know, but... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I will let someone else make that sound. :-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    35. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention wizardry.

      cha-ching.

    36. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will?

    37. Re:I don't know, but... by inKel · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why this is modded as Funny. I totally agree with you, what you've said it's insightful.

      I as an Argentinian, alas Spanish-speaker, I usually even use the opening exclamation and interrogation marks in my sentences. How much could this slow me down? One second? Kudos for you man, you're doing right.

      --
      0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 ...
    38. Re:I don't know, but... by gnick · · Score: 1

      I said that I was a serial comma fanatic, not a spelling fanatic. Never made it more than 30 pages into Atlas Shrugged, despite having a copy on the bookshelf. Maybe I should.

      Here's (kind of) a reference for the quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma#Resolving_ambiguity

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    39. Re:I don't know, but... by binford2k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hear you. I keep expecting the words I write to auto correct. I also double click on web pages now, expecting it to zoom into the closest div like it does on my phone.

    40. Re:I don't know, but... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      That said, I rarely write anything these days and it's often just a scrawl when I do.

      I used to be a reasonably neat writer (*), and if I'm writing something properly and not trying to rush, my writing's as good as ever.

      On the other hand, it's much messier- but still legible- when I'm writing quick notes and stuff. I've come to the conclusion that because I'm now used to being able to type much faster than I can write, I get impatient and try to rush it. (Which doesn't really work, but makes it look messier anyway).

      (*) By good, I mean clear and legible. The way we were taught when I was a kid was essentially a flowing version of "plain" lettering, which is quite similar to the way I still do it. (**) Copperplate and old-fashioned "pretty" handwriting might be aesthetically pleasing to some people, but we shouldn't kid ourselves that it's anything more than that, and it certainly doesn't make your writing any easier to read- quite the opposite.

      (**) Except that I just noticed that I dot my i's and cross my t's at the time I write them (in the latter case using them as the connection with the next letter) rather than going back and doing them at the end of the word. Anyone else find the "proper" way more disruptive and unnatural?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    41. Re:I don't know, but... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I really admire some of the cursive scripts some folks are able to produce. My parents have wonderful cursive handwriting, so it boggles my mind that mine is so illegible!

      Are you talking about "prettiness" or legibility? As I mentioned elsewhere, my joined-up handwriting style is essentially primary-school-style plain letters with joins, but I defy anyone to tell me that this is less legible than old-fashioned handwriting, which I didn't think was particularly easy to read, even as a kid.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    42. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO

    43. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Ayn Rand.

    44. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be John Galt.

    45. Re:I don't know, but... by RivieraKid · · Score: 1

      But that's his ordinary voice!

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    46. Re:I don't know, but... by Neeperando · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yeah, well your mother was a woman of lose morals!

      --
      Being a computer scientist means you tell people how computers should work, not that you know how they actually work.
    47. Re:I don't know, but... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      (*) By good, I mean clear and legible. The way we were taught when I was a kid was essentially a flowing version of "plain" lettering, which is quite similar to the way I still do it. (**) Copperplate and old-fashioned "pretty" handwriting might be aesthetically pleasing to some people, but we shouldn't kid ourselves that it's anything more than that, and it certainly doesn't make your writing any easier to read- quite the opposite.

      My mum still uses the Palmer method for everyday use-- grocery lists, postcards, letters, recipes. She probably drafts Fortran subroutines in it... It's very legible, when done correctly, although it takes a great deal of practice to get there. Palmer handwriting is neat, but not elegant.

    48. Re:I don't know, but... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      While your comment is funny, it also holds a certain amount of truth.

      People use the technology that is supposed to make things easier, and it does precisely that--makes things easier by doing it for you. What did you expect?

      Did you expect to LEARN from NOT doing something?

      Ever since I started typing on my computer (believe it or not, playing Ultima Online taught me to type accurately and quickly), I had to resist the temptation to use acronyms, abbreviations and the like. I knew it was a crutch, even back then. Surprisingly, other players in Ultima Online paid more attention to what I was saying if I actually spelled everything out. I found that people automatically treat other people differently by how much effort they put into what they say. I think many people do it sub-consciously. "kbye" is treated much differently then "May your travels be long and merry! Fare thee well!" would be, and for good reason.

      The answer? Stop using that stuff (unless you're really stuck on the spelling of something)and just do things the way you normally would. You eventually learn to do things just as quickly and accurately on your own. Turn off the auto-fill, auto-correct etc. and simply pay attention to the underlines of a spell checker. When it flags something, try and figure out how it is spelled ON YOUR OWN before trying the suggested spelling.

      If you never get out of the boat, you'll never learn to swim.

    49. Re:I don't know, but... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You would love German nested sentences. You can construct infinitely long sentences with them, that literally are write-only.

      Example: "Das, was das, das das, was das hat hat hat, hat das, was das, das das, was das, das das hat hat hat hat."
      das = that; was = what; hat = has.

      Combine it with dashes, semicola(?), and other dependent clauses, and you can easily form sentences that span one or even multiple pages, and where the beginning of one sentence is nowhere even close to the end of it.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    50. Re:I don't know, but... by dnahelicase · · Score: 1

      Using my dad's 286 when I was very young and having an elementary school with a progressive approach to computer use (and the funds to buy a lot of computers) I can say my ability to spell has not been deteriorated at all. However, my handwriting is awful, hard to read, and I've never been comfortable with the process. I feel I might be one of the early generations of people who has always felt that handwriting was inefficient and cumbersome from a very young age. I can't imagine how kids that are typing at a young age feel now.

    51. Re:I don't know, but... by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Informative
      One other thing...

      I even have difficulty signing my name sometimes, but that's mostly because cursive is my most unpracticed form.

      You obviously don't sign your name that much then.

      My signature used to look like a vaguely "signaturey" version of my handwriting. At some stage- I think it was around 10 years ago when I had to sign things a lot as part of my job- it became detached from my handwriting and got more and more stylised.

      Nowadays it's bordering on a meaningless squiggle; only the first letter is remotely legible. I can still see parts of it, but that's mainly because I know my own name and know what it's meant to be.

      Its only *real* value- and the only intended one!- is that it looks like my other meaningless signature squiggles. :)

      But back to the point- my signature has very little to do with my (not bad) handwriting these days. (^_^)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    52. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      When programming in lisp (a programming language (something that can be compiled into machine code) where syntax (rules for writing (typing) commands) is based (fundamental idea) on parentheses ( ( ( left parenthesis) and ) ( right parenthesis) ) ) one can fall into the habit of using ( and ) (parentheses) in excess (too much (surplus)), though this is another problem (the issue discussed (may be it (the use of parentheses in excess) should not be mentioned here(the discussion of spelling).

    53. Re:I don't know, but... by alexborges · · Score: 1

      And this is important because....

      --
      NO SIG
    54. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safer... I helped my uncle jack dismount.

    55. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *WHOOSH*

    56. Re:I don't know, but... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Same here. Not that I never make errors (among other things, I've read a lot of old books, so my syntax tends to be old-fashioned and/or idiosyncratic), but my spelling and grammar are decent, and I make efforts to keep it so by refusing to overuse l33t sp34k, and using proper capitalization in all occasions.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    57. Re:I don't know, but... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Having Googled it, most of the Palmer method examples I came across aren't as OTT fancy (or pretty) as some handwriting I've seen, but there still seems to be an excess of tails and loops. It's quite "schoolish".

      I'm not sure what systems they used here in the UK over the years; though there are probably a few elements of that style remaining in the way I was taught to write- ironically, the few bits I probably don't use in my own writing. :-)

      It's notable that (apparently) in the Palmer era, they used to teach kids to write joined-up from the start, and it was when this was changed to let kids start with non-joined letters that Palmer declined.

      I was certainly taught plain letters some time before joined-up writing, and I'm in my early thirties now.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    58. Re:I don't know, but... by nx · · Score: 1

      The answer? Stop using that stuff ...

      I agree, to an extent. It's still useful to be able to construct proper sentences, but spelling isn't really that useful in my opinion (and incorrect spelling is a pet peeve of mine). Handwriting is even less useful, and if it doesn't come naturally - forget about it. Spend your time learning a more useful skill. I think it's a bit like saying stop using pen and paper, or a computer, to remember things, it'll deteriorate your memory. In fact, true, but irrelevant. The cognitive unit of pen plus human is much more effective than human alone. So unless you plan to live without pen and paper (and computers, and spelling-correction software), nevermind.

      My two cents.

      --
      L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers.
    59. Re:I don't know, but... by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

      i helped my uncle jack off a horse

      In English this has a double meaning due to the word "jack".

      What he probably means is: I helped my uncle Jack get off of a horse.

      What most deviants, such as myself, will see is: I helped my uncle jack-off a horse. This is very funny if you know that "jack-off" is a term for masturbation. In this particular instance it means he helped his uncle by pulling on the horse's dick. :)

      I don't know what you call a penis in Argentina, but here in the united states we use "cock", "dick", "wang", "johnson", and many other variations.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    60. Re:I don't know, but... by andqso · · Score: 3, Funny

      Doesn't always help. Stolen from Wikipedia: "Highlights of his global tour include encounters with Nelson Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod and a dildo collector."

    61. Re:I don't know, but... by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      I agree. Though I actually use proper spelling and grammar in text messages too (I do not, nor will I ever, tweet). Typing and IRC and IM and such will only affect your language skills if you go out of your way to type like a moron, and like you, I find it more difficult to type incorrectly than correctly. I've never understood the argument "But it's only the internet," which implies that the person in question can, when it really matters, type and spell properly. Of course, seeing their resumes, or proofreading their class papers, it quickly becomes apparant this is not the case.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    62. Re:I don't know, but... by GaryDphotos · · Score: 1

      I agree, Harold. I can type roughly 100 to 120 wpm on a standard keyboard without looking or thinking much about it. To come up with abbreviations (SMS style) does take much more time for me. Sure, with a 130 character or so limit and typing only with thumbs on a cell phone it makes sense to abbreviate. However it's probably an excuse for lack of skill, laziness or ignorance to blame typing on poor grammar and capitalization/punctuation. Either you know how to type AND use the language or you don't. Why would anyone "dumb down" to SMS expressions when typing with a standard keyboard. I will say that my handwriting has deteriorated due to my typing almost everything. I can type more rapidly and accurately, and with less hand cramping, than when I write longhand, so this is one area where I would say typing does cause deterioration of certain skills. So what!

    63. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate Ayn Rand
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      and Doctors and Lawyers and Cops

    64. Re:I don't know, but... by James+McP · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Typing is muscle memory just like playing music. Guitarists don't consciously think "E-G-A-E-G-B/A-E-G-E-E-G" any more than a typist thinks "s-m-o-k-e- -o-n- -t-h-e- -w-a-t-e-r". (Well, bassists might but we're known to be pretty dense.)

      I actually had trouble typing the hyphenated parts as my hands initially would spell out the whole words.

      Have you never had a case where your fingers know your password but you don't? Happens to me all the time.

      --
      I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
    65. Re:I don't know, but... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      My signature underwent a similar transformation over the years. Fifteen years ago it was clearly legible cursive, and now it's just a squiggle. (Incidentally, joking about this phenomenon once caused me to laugh chocolate milk through my nose. Quite unpleasant.) Like you, I only know what it says because it's supposed to be my name, and it looks like the rest of the squiggles I make when I sign my name.

      Of course, even the squiggle is starting to lose stability. It used to have little bumps for each letter, but those bumps are smoothing themselves away now...

      My handwriting, on the other hand, is fairly bad, but at least I can read it. I rarely write anything by hand that other people need to read anyway, and when I do (e.g. addressing an envelope) I try to write a little clearer. My wife's handwriting is fairly ugly, as well.

      On the other hand, my dad's signature and handwriting are very clear (though other than his signature he just writes in small caps), and my mom has immaculate handwriting. There's definitely something generational going on here.

    66. Re:I don't know, but... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      As for the article, I don't see why typing would ruin the ability to spell.

      Think "Microsoft Word's autocorrect" and you'll get a fair idea how it might happen.

    67. Re:I don't know, but... by pvera · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Same here, it riles me up when people are too lazy to write things right, especially when I know these are educated people. There is no excuse for MBAs and PhDs to send me emails full of spelling and grammar errors, it means they are too lazy/stupid/whatever to figure out how to turn on the spell checker.

      Casual messaging? sure, who cares? But in business communications? Absolutely unacceptable.

      It is so bad that we have a standing order at our shop to never type customer-provided content. 100% cut-and-paste for any text provided to us. Why? So *their* typos are carried over. If and when they are caught during QA, we have them resubmit the content, instead of doing spot fixes. It is much easier to paste the whole paragraph than to chase each word that is misspelled.

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    68. Re:I don't know, but... by Smivs · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't spell but it doesn't matter....Google knows what I meant!

    69. Re:I don't know, but... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, an old-fashioned dictionary does you no good if the letter you get rong is the first one. (yes, that was intentional)

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    70. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I've always maintained correct/proper capitalization and grammar and compete sentences, even in IMs and IRC chats.

      I've also always used competing sentences in my random IM and IRC discussions ...

    71. Re:I don't know, but... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I judge people online by the attention they put into their writing (since that's all I know about them).

      It especially annoys me when people attempt to participate in an intelligent discussion but can't bother to spell (or even break their thoughts into sentences), so while they may have interesting things to say, I'll never know because my brain won't process walls of broken English. (It's worse when the offender is a 13-year-old who tries to pretend he's older.)

    72. Re:I don't know, but... by pablo.cl · · Score: 2, Informative

      inKel isn't answering to the uncle Jack comment, but to

      That's why I've always maintained correct/proper capitalization and grammar and compete sentences, even in IMs and IRC chats. In fact, it actually slows me down when I have to purposely corrupt a text message in order to reduce its size (such as on Twitter or SMS).

      Moderated as follows

      30% Informative
      40% Interesting
      30% Funny

    73. Re:I don't know, but... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I've read a lot of old books, so my syntax tends to be old-fashioned and/or idiosyncratic

      I've had people look at me funny after I've used "must needs" in a sentence... so I know what you mean.

    74. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make the grammar nazi's crazy, punctuate this properly:

      that that is is that that is not is not

      There are two possible answers.

    75. Re:I don't know, but... by anotheregomaniac · · Score: 2, Interesting
    76. Re:I don't know, but... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      So your uncle stands a stallion and ships semen for AI and you helped him collect. Hope you wore a helmet.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    77. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, a serial (or Oxford) comma would have made that statement clear. GPP omitted the comma to make a point (i.e. Ayn Rand and God are not the author's parents).

    78. Re:I don't know, but... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I really admire some of the cursive scripts some folks are able to produce. My parents have wonderful cursive handwriting, so it boggles my mind that mine is so illegible!

      If you don't use it, you lose it. I tried writing out a letter by hand a while back and was having trouble just remembering how some of the letters are formed. If I'd hand-printed it or typed it, I wouldn't have had a problem, but the nature of the letter indicated that cursive script would've been more appropriate. I eventually got through it without too many crossed-out words, but it looked like it was written by someone with a bad case of arthritis.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    79. Re:I don't know, but... by jgrahn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Never made it more than 30 pages into Atlas Shrugged, despite having a copy on the bookshelf.

      Next time, try to pick it down from the shelf first. Much easier.

    80. Re:I don't know, but... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Is one of them,

      "That that is is that that" is not "is not".

      ?

      (Okay, "That that is, is; that that is not, is not." I'm not entirely sure the commas are necessary, but they do help make it readable.)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    81. Re:I don't know, but... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, try telling that to a mom... (I did, plenty of times)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    82. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That that is, is. That that is not, is not.

      Try this:
      john while jack had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher

    83. Re:I don't know, but... by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Typing is muscle memory just like playing music [...] Have you never had a case where your fingers know your password but you don't? Happens to me all the time.

      I have ... but I think that's a special case. And I think the OP's problem isn't universal. Might work that way for a lot of people, but not for me.

      One scary thing though is that I read and write so much english that it is getting harder to write in swedish.

    84. Re:I don't know, but... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Think "Microsoft Word's autocorrect" and you'll get a fair idea how it might happen.

      or the iPhone's autocorrect, for that matter. "Its" converted to "it's" (when "its" is actually the correct usage) FTL. Considering how it seems to hinder almost as much as it helps, I'm going to switch it off and see how it goes.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    85. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "to purposely corrupt"

      Strunk & White recommend against splitting infinitives.

    86. Re:I don't know, but... by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    87. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      E-G-A E-G-Bb-A E-G-A G-E

    88. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, it riles me up when people are too lazy to write things right, especially when I know these are educated people. There is no excuse for MBAs and PhDs to send me emails full of spelling and grammar errors, it means they are too lazy/stupid/whatever to figure out how to turn on the spell checker.

      Some people are also too lazy/stupid/whatever to avoid comma splices...

    89. Re:I don't know, but... by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 1

      What helped me was being required to use MLA for papers at the master's level. I learned a lot of things about punctuation in English, and it piqued my curiosity so much I had to check back on the standards in my mother tongue as well.

      --
      "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
    90. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I helped my parents, Anne Rand and God, jack off a horse.

    91. Re:I don't know, but... by DriedClexler · · Score: 2, Funny

      My fingers know the password to my sperm bank.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    92. Re:I don't know, but... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Its only *real* value- and the only intended one!- is that it looks like my other meaningless signature squiggles. :)

      Ha!

      The only real value of my meaningless signature squiggle is that it looks almost, but not entirely, unlike every other meaningless signature squiggle I've ever written.

      Seriously. I full expect one day to receive a call from my bank. "Excuse me, Mr. Burke, but the last seven checks we've processed for you have had identical signatures, and we suspect that your checkbook has been stolen."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    93. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IDK what's wrong with you people, my handwriting is fine.

      Maybe because I've always written in cursive?

    94. Re:I don't know, but... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      I never, ever use a spell-checker. Be it in Dutch, German, English or Scandinavian

      Scandinavian is a language?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    95. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why we can't have an Uncle Jack. : /

    96. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > To my parents, Anne Rand and God.

      That's Ayn Rand, you Socialist! Ayn rhymes with "mine." ~

    97. Re:I don't know, but... by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      I do the same. I try to use correct spelling and grammar in my posts all across the Internet. I hate when I have to decipher this "text-speak" dialect that everyone else seems to speak so fluently.

      Also, spelling correctly and using proper grammar makes you look smarter than 95% of the Internet. I hate going to a message board and seeing stuff like "u" and "ne1" and these other corruptions of letter order that are supposed to stand for perfectly good words. Character limit on a message board post is either huge or non-existent. GameFAQs boards, for example, have a character limit of 4096 characters per post. Even that is sufficiently large for 99.999% of posts on that site, at least. There's really no excuse for text-speak on the Internet.

      It's like a programmer who doesn't comment his code - I don't care if it cuts down on the typing you had to do, what's more important: how much you type, or how readable it is to anyone who wants to read it?

      Okay, now that I've ranted about how much I hate seeing poor grammar and spelling on the Internet, please point out my mistakes in this post. You all know you want to. It's practically a law of the Internet that anyone who complains about this sort of stuff is bound to make at least one error of his own.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    98. Re:I don't know, but... by kzieli · · Score: 1

      The whole point is that when you lean to touch type you end up learning how to type words mechanically. Instead of the being remembered as a sequence of letters you start remembering it as a sequence of muscle movements. As I type this I am not looking down at the keyboard. And yet I don't actually consciously remember where the letters are. Well OK. I know querty, and asdf but I can't off the top of my head tell you what the last three letters in the third row of the keyboard are, or where exactly the 'v' is. Yet I am still able to type vision without having to look down. So yes touch typing is a different kind of memory and I could see how the ability to spell on the keyboard would not transfer to the ability to spell when writing, or trying to explicitly spell words by saying the letters.

      --
      read my mind at http://the-willows.blogspot.com/
    99. Re:I don't know, but... by dangitman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Working in a large business where writing professional emails helps as well; I purposely try to use proper capitilisation and punctuation as required.

      I wouldn't be surprised if in some not-too-distant idiocratic future, you'd be fired for using proper spelling and grammar in business correspondence, because you "talk like a fag."

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    100. Re:I don't know, but... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Your "joined" writing is probably readable, but it's a lot slower because you have to lift your pen off the paper. The reason why "cursive" was invented was so you could write an entire word with a single stroke, which speeds-up the writing process.

      BTW:

      My handwriting is beautiful. People probably think I'm gay because I write like a girl, but it's how I was taught, and also because I'm still old-fashioned enough to use a pad-and-pen rather than any kind of electronic gadget. The paper is free and ditto the pen, and that's my main motivation - to save money.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    101. Re:I don't know, but... by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Your meaningless squiggles are my ticket to wealth. I love forging checks and you "squiggle people" make it so easy." - Mr. Scam Artist

      I keep my signature as close to the original letters my teacher taught me. Therefore it looks virtually identical to my signature from 20 years ago when I first signed my SSI card. It's also harder to forge since any deviation would be immediately noticeable as "not me".

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    102. Re:I don't know, but... by davidshewitt · · Score: 1

      I purposely try to use proper capitilisation and punctuation as required.

      But maybe not the spelling...

    103. Re:I don't know, but... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      No, a comma there in that case would make it appear that "800-year-old demigod" were a non-restrictive appositive.

      As in:
      "[...] Nelson Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod, and a dildo collector."
      would seem like:
      "[...] Nelson Mandela (an 800-year-old demigod) and a dildo collector."

      I pretty much always use serial commas, but in cases like that, it doesn't help.

      --
      No existe.
    104. Re:I don't know, but... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      I use the serial comma; however, in some cases the serial comma still leaves things unclear.

      Take for example:
      "To my mom, Ayn Rand, and God."
      In that sentence, it may appear that "Ayn Rand" were set off by commas to function as a non-restrictive appositive, as though one were writing "To my mom (Ayn Rand) and God."

      --
      No existe.
    105. Re:I don't know, but... by Razalhague · · Score: 1

      It's not the medium, it's the physical process of writing. With a keyboard, every character is a single button press (excluding any funny characters), with a pen it's a series of motions. I often often misspell 'nn' as 'm' when writing with a pen, and it's not a case of unclear handwriting (I write characters well separated), it's a case of motor memory confusing two similar motions. I'd never make that mistake when writing with a keyboard. I sometimes press the wrong key, don't press the key hard enough for it to register, or press a key twice when writing on a keyboard. Mistakes I'd never make with a pen. Like your "a properly phrases sentence".

    106. Re:I don't know, but... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I frequently have to type my passwords to see what they are.

      My spelling has improved since I started typing my grammar has gotten worse. I was always a big reader so I knew lots of good words and how to put them altogether when I was a kid. To much time in online forums has destroyed my ability to string meaningful sentences together.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    107. Re:I don't know, but... by regrepsnefpoh · · Score: 1

      i helped my uncle jack off of a horse

    108. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An erudite individual will have a better grasp of language.

      a whosa watnow?

    109. Re:I don't know, but... by winkydink · · Score: 1

      I thought we agreed that we weren't gonna talk about your sister on /.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    110. Re:I don't know, but... by Chuq · · Score: 1

      John, while Jack had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.

      --
      - Chuq
    111. Re:I don't know, but... by shiftless · · Score: 1

      My signature underwent a similar transformation over the years. Fifteen years ago it was clearly legible cursive, and now it's just a squiggle. (Incidentally, joking about this phenomenon once caused me to laugh chocolate milk through my nose. Quite unpleasant.)

      You must be a hoot at parties!

    112. Re:I don't know, but... by bronney · · Score: 1

      show us!

    113. Re:I don't know, but... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Ah, I haven't had to deal with that for years :) But still, unless someone has a fairly flimsy grasp of spelling in the first place (to the point where they doubt how to spell common words and where to put apostrophes), I don't think that would cause problems.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    114. Re:I don't know, but... by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

      Who gives a fuck about an Oxford comma? I've seen those English dramas too. They're cruel.

      Yes, I quote Vampire Weekend lyrics in lieu of wit.

    115. Re:I don't know, but... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      When I used a non-QWERTY phone, I always turned T9 predictive text on because it makes it easier to type properly spelled words than compressed textspeak.

      You also lose the benefit of the iPhone's missed-key correction, unless the misplaced keys are right next to each other.

    116. Re:I don't know, but... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Since I started using an iPhone, I've found that I use "it's" a lot more frequently than I use "its". I'm thankful that the keyboard works the way it does, because it requires fewer taps to explicitly choose "its" after being suggested "it's" (i.e. one tap on the word itself) than it does to manually add the apostrophe.

    117. Re:I don't know, but... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Funny real-life example: I was forwarded an email from someone at a haulage company who was obviously relying on a spellchecker, as he had referred to his heavy goods vehicle operators as 'divers'.

    118. Re:I don't know, but... by quotationspage · · Score: 1

      "Nothing you can't spell will ever work." --Will Rogers

    119. Re:I don't know, but... by Ciaran+Power · · Score: 1

      Have you never had a case where your fingers know your password but you don't? Happens to me all the time.

      Not just passwords, but emacs commands. I can never remember what keys, say, tabbify-region is, or spell-check-this-word, or whatever. But if I put my hands on the keyboard they remember what to do

    120. Re:I don't know, but... by azgard · · Score: 1

      You probably are a fanatic if you dedicate something to Ayn Rand.

    121. Re:I don't know, but... by stars_are_number_1 · · Score: 1

      As I've grown up I developed my signature with its own style. I never write cursive and someone got past that requirement in grade school. What I find fascinating is after about 5 years of tweaking it and getting to a consistent style that I like and is easy to write, it has turned out very similar to my dad's. Great minds think alike, I guess. :-)

    122. Re:I don't know, but... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      there's simply no substitute for erudition

      *Right clicks erudition, clicks "dictionary"*
      "extensive knowledge acquired chiefly from books : profound, recondite, or bookish learning"

      How is that worse than looking it up in an actual dictionary? Especially as I don't have a paper dictionary on my desk, and I'm meant to be working right now so a trip to the library wouldn't be appropriate (even though there is one in the next room).

    123. Re:I don't know, but... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the sentence "I want to put hyphens between the words Fish and and and and and Chips in my 'Fish and Chips' sign" have been clearer if quotation marks had been placed before Fish, and between Fish and and, and and and and, and and and and, and and and and, and and and and, and and and Chips, as well as after Chips?

    124. Re:I don't know, but... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      That might depend how old you are. MS Word has had autocorrect since I was about 11, around the time I started using it for longer bits of schoolwork.

      I still have trouble remembering how to spell words like "occur" (I put "occour", like "colour"), repetitive (not repetetive, repeatitive, etc), accommodation, congratulate, ...

      It's a combination of not touch typing at that point, so I didn't notice the word had been autocorrected for me, and not taking the time to learn the correct spelling when a mistake wasn't autocorrected and I had to choose a replacement manually.

    125. Re:I don't know, but... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I regularly type the wrong words through muscle memory. It's like having T9 for words on my PC -- my fingers anticipate what's coming next, type it, and then I have to hit ^Backspace to get rid of it.

      (I typed: ^Backspace and^?to get rid of it.

      (I type:^Hd ^Backspace... this is becoming recursive [this is more^?becoming...])

    126. Re:I don't know, but... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      My handwriting's awful and I put it down to a combination of a) typing pretty much everything so lacking practice, and b) being so much faster typing than writing - I taught myself to touchtype 20 years ago - that when I write by hand it's frustrating as my hand doesn't keep up, thereby making my writing a feverish chickenscratch.
      On the plus side, no-one can read over my shoulder when I'm taking notes in meetings! I've found the only tool that's helped me significantly with this is a 0.5mm mechanical pencil. For some reason these really help my legibility.

    127. Re:I don't know, but... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah in the days when I started using computers for school reports it was around 1990 (I was 7) so there wasn't such a thing as auto-correct (at least on Corel Studio or whatever the name of the office suit we had was). There was a spell checker, but it didn't even underline misspelled words though I don't think. Heh, firefox highlighted that I can't spell misspelled, fun times. Later on when I noticed Word correct words for me, I just turned off that feature.

      I used to read a lot of books as a kid so my spelling has always been above average, but I think like you I have had problems with some words, like I didn't know I wasn't spelling repetitive incorrectly until I noticed it being underlined when typing online. So in that respects I actually think that computers are improving my spelling rather than the other way around.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    128. Re:I don't know, but... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Your "joined" writing is probably readable

      I'm not sure if your quotes are supposed to imply that my writing isn't "true" cursive (the term you would use) or you think that "joined-up writing" means something different to cursive.

      "Joined-up writing" is the British name for what you Americans refer to as cursive; there's no difference as such.

      You may have a point about lifting my pen off the paper, but it's notable that (e.g.) the stroke of the "t" goes downwards to become the start of the following "e", and the "joined-uppedness" of my writing increases when I'm writing normally or fast.

      The cost of both paper and computer is negligible for my uses (I'd have a computer anyway, and paper isn't expensive). Price isn't an issue.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    129. Re:I don't know, but... by rackeer · · Score: 1

      Are you really using vi? Tried :help spell in vim?

    130. Re:I don't know, but... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      unless someone has a fairly flimsy grasp of spelling in the first place (to the point where they doubt how to spell common words and where to put apostrophes)

      ... a lot of younger people these days have exactly this problem. I'd place the blame on text-messaging shorthand, rather than Word's autocorrect, but I can see how autocorrect could exacerbate the problem.

      And it doesn't help that my informal observation leads me to believe that the average American's vocabulary is shrinking, despite the easy access to many free dictionaries and thesauruses (thesauri?)...

      I mean, if people can't bother to read enough to know what "exacerbate" means, what makes you think they'll have any idea how to spell? And if the computer will magically fix it for them, why would they bother actually learning to spell?

      I realize I'm being fairly pessimistic, and I am deliberately exaggerating the situation, but I'm sure you can see my point.

    131. Re:I don't know, but... by Ando[evilmedic] · · Score: 1

      You missed some closing parentheses!

    132. Re:I don't know, but... by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Start with The Fountainhead, it's much more digestible and in my opinion, a better read in general.

    133. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing quite a few right parenthesis at the end there buddy.

    134. Re:I don't know, but... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Here. Obviously this is not my handwriting, but it's the style I was taught and still use today:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cursive

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    135. Re:I don't know, but... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Oh okay. I was thinking of my former classmates who used ordinary block letters, and then joined them with "legs" rather than use true cursive script.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    136. Re:I don't know, but... by bronney · · Score: 1

      I know what cursive is lol. I want to see yours! :D

    137. Re:I don't know, but... by somersault · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean, but I think the situation with spelling wasn't much better before the internet and texting, it's just that most communication between friends was verbal rather than written, so you wouldn't notice how bad someone's spelling and punctuation usage was. For example I saw an email from a ~50 year old director at our company, I saw where he mixed up lose/loose. I was thinking that was just a modern day internet problem, but apparently not. In fact when I see those words used correctly I still do a double take to make sure that they're the correct usages because I'm so used to seeing the wrong ones.. -_-

      The sad thing is that poor spelling doesn't necessarily mean someone is an idiot, but I can't help but lower my opinion of someone when they mix up words like that. It smacks of laziness somehow.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    138. Re:I don't know, but... by somersault · · Score: 1

      I should really stop altering sentences after I've written them, it often leaves redundant phrases..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    139. Re:I don't know, but... by alexburke · · Score: 1

      I stole it. (They only look at the last name when they ask for ID, anyway.)

      Plus, it boggles the mind that your nation still relies on horrendously-antiquated checks. We graduated from that over ten years ago now, and it's been almost a year since I saw anyone's checkbook in public.

    140. Re:I don't know, but... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. I'd mod you up if I could ;)

      but I can't help but lower my opinion of someone when they mix up words like that. It smacks of laziness somehow.

      I'm the same way... I'm unsure of whether it's a good thing.

    141. Re:I don't know, but... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      What, you think anyone is going to look that closely? Before you notice a deduction in your account you don't recognize, or realize your checkbook or account number was stolen? It might make it easier to say it's not you after the fact, but that's not the only way to contest fraudulent charges, and in any case it's a huge pain in the ass. I just keep my checkbook and account number safe, watch my transaction history online, and limit my exposure by not keeping all my money in my checking account.

      But really, the sad/funny thing I was getting at is that my "meaningless squiggles" are actually my legitimate attempt to sign my name, it's just my penmenship is horrible.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    142. Re:I don't know, but... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I also don't participate in the 'leetspeak'.

      Thats wild, 1 d0 and I'm a g33z3r! It's not the only foreign language I speak either. I also speak Thai (sawat-dee), Spanish (Buenos Dias), Ebonics (Yo, dawg!), Redneck (Howdy!), drunk (UUURP), Bwastan, Nwew Ywak, and mime().

      As well as a few computer languages. One of these days I might actually master English.

    143. Re:I don't know, but... by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      That's why I've always maintained correct/proper capitalization and grammar and compete sentences, even in IMs and IRC chats. In fact, it actually slows me down when I have to purposely corrupt a text message in order to reduce its size (such as on Twitter or SMS).

      Dang, I thought I was the only one who did this. Over the past couple years, I have even started slipping myself... but when I notice it, I try to correct it in my texting. If I'm on a real keyboard, I always try to use proper spelling, punctuation and grammar... but sometimes I let myself slip on a phone pad. T9 has an effect on my spelling more than anything else, oddly enough. Although, I think T9 has improved my spelling, since it's faster to spell it properly in T9 anyway. God forbid if you get the wrong spelling of something on a learning T9 phone... then it shows up like that until you go through the usually annoying process of getting rid of it.

    144. Re:I don't know, but... by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. I try to use correct spelling and grammar, full sentences, and capital letters. I admit that sometimes I use punctuation poorly (I use way too many commas and have fallen into the habit of using several periods.....I guess to indicate that I am pausing and thinking. I could probably do much better but at least I make an effort to make myself sound coherent.

      One thing that I have wondered is what people on the other end of communications are thinking. When they see my lengthy message full of an assortment of proper words is their reaction "This guy is a pompous ass!" in Idiocracy style "His shit is all fucked up and he talks like a fag" fashion? Since the quality of the responses rarely mirrors the quality of my messages it certainly does not make them consider responding in a more formal manner.

    145. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least give the credit to the bash.org quote:

      http://bash.org/?367896

      #367896 +(7665)- [X]

        Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my uncle Jack off a horse.." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse.."

    146. Re:I don't know, but... by CrazeeCracker · · Score: 1

      I've always maintained correct/proper capitalization and grammar and compete sentences, even in IMs and IRC chats.

      Same here â" for the most part.

      In fact, I'd have to argue that my spelling and grammar have not only not suffered, they have actually benefited a great deal. Since English isn't my native tongue, I owe a lot of my fluency and vocabulary to English-speaking IRC rooms that I used to frequent quite a bit a few years ago. While I did have extensive tuition in English (having been at a bilingual school for most of my life), I'm pretty sure that my essay writing has improved because of IRC. I'd argue that it's better than reading books (not that anyone should give up on that) because of the interactive element: you can ask to have things explained to you by natives who know what they're talking about (most of the time, anyway), and you'll be corrected by the grammar/spelling nazis if you make a mistake. Of course a lot of this depends on finding a decent e-community that uses real English and is populated by people with at least half a brain, but if you're lucky enough to be part of one, it really does wonders to your English, especially if you're a foreigner.

      --
      Of course I didn't RTFA.
    147. Re:I don't know, but... by slickassnot · · Score: 1

      Right Harold J. It takes longer, more (recalcitrant) brain cells are involved, but it's, like, *totally* worth it. "That's why I've always maintained..." Also a good point. A good habit has to be maintained but, like I said, it's so worth the trouble. After all, words are all we have when communicating like this (no facial expressions etc.) so your messages should be concise, to the point and correctly spelled. I am often baffled, when reading forum posts, by mistakes/omissions I guess are the result of simply not proof-reading or previewing. An omitted or misspelled word can render the whole message meaningless. Unclear writing suggests (to me, anyway,) an unclear mind.

    148. Re:I don't know, but... by ephesus · · Score: 1

      It's at best short sighted but more likely simply uninformed to think that people with baggy pants, hats on backward and cans of spray paint in their hand can't speak proper English. I'm failing to see how one's fashion sense has a bearing on their diction or grammar. You have some stereotyping issues you might want to consider.

    149. Re:I don't know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it would be easier to forge. Arbitrary squiggles are more stylistic and based on the individual. Replicating some ridiculous made up squiggle is hard. Mimicking by-the-book cursive makes your signature a lot easier to duplicate (even the way you do your loops, curls, etc.)

    150. Re:I don't know, but... by glarbl_blarbl · · Score: 1

      Hm. I thought I remembered Smoke on the Water being in A... But here they're playing it in G.

      --
      I use friend/foe to signal strong [dis]agreement instead of mod points. What else are f/f good for?
  2. Yse by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tpying ahs runed my ablty.

    1. Re:Yse by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling this thread is going to gather so many spelling and grammar nazis that you'd think you were in Buenos Aires!

    2. Re:Yse by KWolfe81 · · Score: 1

      I really didn't want to click on this thread because I foresaw all of the posts were going to contain purposely misspelled works lacking punctuation.... Uhg.

    3. Re:Yse by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

      I used capitals and punctuation correctly! I am no barbarian ;-)

    4. Re:Yse by adisakp · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that my grammar is also affected; maybe this is because I spent too much time on IRC

      imho 2b honest... i dont think typin' is the prob...

      *shrug*

    5. Re:Yse by oldhack · · Score: 1

      You're suffering the progressive Slavism.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  3. No, but by warrax_666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's ruining my ability to finish a

    --
    HAND.
    1. Re:No, but by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      No, but it's ruining my ability to finish a

      I think you accidently the

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    2. Re:No, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sandwich?

      (Hopefully there are other Arrested Development fans that read this...)

  4. Not just spelling ... by nervepack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... penmanship is no longer a scholastic requirement. Long live printing!

    1. Re:Not just spelling ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear!

      I haven't written anything since the fifth grade, nearly 15 years ago. All I do is print, and type.

    2. Re:Not just spelling ... by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      Hah, yeah. Though I don't mind that so much. My only grade less than an A throughout my K-12 years was a B in handwriting.

    3. Re:Not just spelling ... by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      My penmanship is good, I can write in a legible cursive, but I never do.

      I am left handed, and spent two years in high school doing lettering for blueprints. Printing comes to me more naturally now than cursive ever did. That and no one ever has to ask me what a letter is or what a word is supposed to be. People do ask me why I cross me Zeroes, Z's (Zeds to the Brits and Canadians) and Sevens though.

      I am however concerned about the effect typing and easy access to spellcheck are having on my writing. I always have to go over messages more when I'm typing in a program that doesn't have auto-spellcheck and highlighting turned on.

      Like others have mentioned I deliberately don't use leet speak, or shortcuts in any medium to prevent it from degrading my professional work.

    4. Re:Not just spelling ... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Well, with so much of mundane stuff being done electronically, I now find that when I do use a pen, I can take the time to do it better. I like to use a nice thin or caligraphic dipping pen with some awesome pigment inks.

      My favorite nibs are Hunt nibs

      My favorite ink is Winsor&Newton

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    5. Re:Not just spelling ... by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      People do ask me why I cross my zeroes, Zs (zees to the Americans) and...

      There, fixed that for you. The letter itself stands for its standard name.

  5. What ability to spell? by rs79 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have to be kidding me. Where would this network be today if I could spell?

    http://rs79.vrx.net/works/usenet/alt.sex/
    http://rs79.vrx.net/works/usenet/terms/froup/

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  6. Absolutely! by al0ha · · Score: 1

    My handwriting has been reduced to chicken-scratch and the characters vary between block and script for no apparent reason; it is just what comes out. I sometimes even have trouble writing characters such as 'e' or 'q' where I have to concentrate to make sure they look legible.

    --
    Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    1. Re:Absolutely! by al0ha · · Score: 1

      However this has not effected my spelling in the least, unless illegible characters count for misspelling.

      --
      Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    2. Re:Absolutely! by Macka · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. Since the introduction of chip 'n pin credit cards I don't even have to sign my name any more. In fact there are only two reasons I ever pick up a pen now. 1) To write a birthday/xmas/greeting card for someone and I really have to concentrate to make sure its legible. 2) If I go to a seminar and want to scratch a few memory joggers in a notebook. Typically you have to write quickly when doing that, and it looks atrocious. I don't think I'm too bad with my spelling though.

      The last time I tried writing properly I got as far as half a side of A4 and my hand was killing me !

    3. Re:Absolutely! by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Informative

      However this has not effected my spelling in the least, unless illegible characters count for misspelling.

      Was that intended as a joke? Otherwise it appears that you can't spell "affected"!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:Absolutely! by deek · · Score: 1

      His spelling is spot on. His grammar needs a little more work.

    5. Re:Absolutely! by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Randall Munroe, is that you?

    6. Re:Absolutely! by Chuq · · Score: 1

      For #2, get a netbook.

      For #1.. I dunno.. lose some friends? :P

      --
      - Chuq
  7. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're getting old, that's all. Of course, as a society, we judged it is more important to have tools sheds on Mars and nice cars than invest in anti-aging technology.

  8. Well, that and the age and alchohol by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank god for spill check.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Well, that and the age and alchohol by mcgrew · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'll drynk to that!

    2. Re:Well, that and the age and alchohol by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Now if you had a *cat*, at least you would be able to thank her without such ambiguity you just made.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Well, that and the age and alchohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The usual reply:

                      I halve a spelling chequer
                      It came with my pea sea
                      It plane lee marques four my revue
                      Miss steaks aye ken knot sea

                      Eye ran this poem threw it
                      Your sure reel glad two no
                      It's vary polished in it's weigh
                      My chequer tolled me sew

                      A chequer is a bless sing
                      It freeze yew lodes of thyme
                      It helps me awl stiles two reed
                      And aides mi when aye rime

                      To rite with care is quite a feet
                      Of witch won should be proud
                      And wee mussed dew the best wee can
                      Sew flaws are knot aloud

                      And now bee cause my spelling
                      is checked with such grate flare
                      Their are know faults with in my cite
                      Of nun eye am a wear

                      Each frays come posed up on my screen
                      Eye trussed to be a joule
                      The chequer poured o'er every word
                      To cheque sum spelling rule

                      That's why aye brake in two averse
                      My righting wants too pleas
                      Sow now ewe sea wye aye dew prays
                      Such soft wear for pea seas

    4. Re:Well, that and the age and alchohol by squizzar · · Score: 1

      You seem to have yours set to South African...

  9. I don't think it has been a problem. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I usually try to stick to full sentences when typing(though my abuse of commas and parenthetical comments is egregious) so I don't think that it has done my grammar much harm.

    Spelling, also, seems to be ok. Because I can't quite trust automatic spell checks, I still find that making spelling mistakes carries a small cost in time and annoyance. However, my spelling mistakes do annoy me a great deal more when I am writing; because I don't have an easy way to look up corrected spellings and corrections tend to be messy.

    As for "writing" more broadly, I've not found any reason to think that computers reduce the need for that. Until we come up with an interface that allows me to dump mental state directly to the machine, and shove that around, writing will still be the only real option for expressing complex ideas in a reasonably precise and concise manner.

    1. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by Tacvek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Abuse of parenthetical comments? Like having nested parenthetical comments that make reading the original difficult? I do that too.

      The recommended solution is the use of footnotes[1], since somebody can jump down to them, read them, then jump back up and easily reread the whole sentence ignoring them[2].

      [1] Like this.
      [2] Further footnotes allow nesting without any difficulties[3] such as avoiding parentheses mismatch.
      [3] That said, nested footnotes should be use sparingly[4], as with too many layers it can be hard to reverse back up the stack.
      [4] And recursive footnotes should never be used[4].
      [5] Unreferenced footnotes are also something to avoid.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    2. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by Vovk · · Score: 1

      i wish i could mod this up.

    3. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      [4] And recursive footnotes should never be used[4].

      At least it's a tail-recursive footnote[1], so a good brain will just infinite loop, rather than overflowing the stack.

      [1] Unlike a non-tail-recursive footnote[1] would look like this one.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      (write I (using lisp my-sentences))

    5. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang you for giving me a stack overflow in my brain!

    6. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by d4nowar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got stuck reading "And recursive footnotes should never be used" over and over again. Augh!

    7. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by pavon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unreferenced footnotes aren't the worst[6] thing you could do.

    8. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      Did you try ctrl-c?

    9. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by Will+Work+For+Joules · · Score: 1

      Segmentation fault.

    10. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      When that happens to me, I eventually blow my stack, and quit reading. After that, I am fine!

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    11. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by Carpeaux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jokes such as this make me want two things: 1. Some way to mod a commentary as "Brilliant", so that, when growing bored of a topic, I don't miss something truly awesome. 2. Some part in Slashdot where we can read all these "Brilliant" commentaries, the funny, the insightful etc. This would be one fucken awesome book. Sometimes I feel we are loosing great material here, things which are really interesting and get lost in the hundreds ofn topics, never to be read again. ??? Still not convinced whether I should create a signature or not.

    12. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      My brain does lazy evaluation with cache, so neither are a problem.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    13. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    14. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      That would be a dangling[7] footnote

      [8] but I agree, unreferenced footnotes are bad.
      [10] so are badly numbered ones.

    15. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

      My spelling has never been the problem (look out for the *ahem* deliberate mistakes later in this comment!), as I was an irritating little swot at school and learned every word I could get my eyes on. My typing is far more likely to contain errors, however, as I never really learned to do it properly and modern word processing software corrects so much before I've noticed it's wrong that I have little chance to check and correct the errors I'm making. Turning off all of the autocorrect options (half from irritation and half from necessity; it's very annoying when a word processor 'corrects' your capitalisation when you're trying to write out a variable list where M and m mean different things) alerted me to the sheer number of mistakes I was making. I found myself making errors with words I knew and had to look them up to find out why they had a red squiggle underneath them.

      I did think that typing in place of writing was causing me to forget how to spell or use correct grammatical constructs, but I've recently started scrawling on a pad with a fountain pen for relaxation purposes and found that as soon as I had a pen in my hand everything on the page was spelled and punctuated correctly. It isn't just a case of my not noticing because errors aren't pointed out to me; they're also fine when I copy-type them later. Doing this has also alerted me to how little I write; my handwriting used to be quite pleasant to look at. Now, it's practically illegible. I broke the thumb on my writing hand about four years ago and have written so little since then that I have yet to relearn the required relaxed dexterity in that hand to write neatly.

      Why there should be a link between my method of putting words on the page and my ability to spell is uncertain. As I didn't start typing regularly until I went to university, which was about the same time I started using letters more algebraically than lexically, maybe I just never linked the language skills to typing as efficiently as I did to manual script. Well, that's my theory, anyway. Feel free to tear it to shreds.

    16. Re:I don't think it has been a problem. by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Yeah footnote arithmetic is a pretty bad idea.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
  10. No by GroundBounce · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Typing has definitely reduced my ability to hand write quickly and legibly, but not my ability to spell. I think spelling has been affected more by the fact that I write much less now than a long time ago.

    1. Re:No by neosaurus · · Score: 1

      I think it has a lot to do with consciously correcting yourself when you see the little red wavy line when on IM or composing an email in FF. A lot of people get dragged into using incorrect punctuation and misspell to follow an unsaid IM and email 'protocol'. A number of my friends find it annoying when I use 'you' instead of 'u' and other abbreviated words in IM conversations (Some even complained that they thought I used a bot to auto-converse in IM).

    2. Re:No by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I would say losing the ability to spell is a slightly different issue than forgetting how to write. Spellcheck may ruin the ability to spell, and you only get spellcheck by typing, but that's not directly because of less writing by hand. Two issues being conflated here. And no, despite spending ~10 hours/day on the computer, I have neither forgotten how to write by hand (it's just slow as molasses), nor have I forgotten how to spell. Maybe the author is just lazy?

    3. Re:No by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I do find that struggling to keep up with say, taking notes, or with a cramped up hand in pain, I automatically seem to start forgetting to write in certain letters. Or sometimes just write the blatantly wrong letter (despite the fact I know how to spell the word). That and, consciously trying to paraphrase so I can keep up with say, whatever notes I'm trying to take down.

      Typing I'm a lot more comfortable with, and faster...so I don't get those problems. Sure, typing so much has probably made my handwriting spelling/grammar drop, but not because I'm picking up bad habits from typing so much as just not keeping up my skills in writing.

  11. I just jacked off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Made a little mess..

  12. me thinks the opposite by pigphish · · Score: 1

    Having quick/convenient access to a spell checker, thesaurus, and dictionary has increased my orthography. My penmanship is another story but that wasn't the word processors fault to begin with.

    1. Re:me thinks the opposite by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Having a spell checker is indeed important. If you cast an unchecked spell, it might do something different than intended!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:me thinks the opposite by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Having a spell checker is indeed important. If you cast an unchecked spell, it might do something different than intended!

      I know just the err..primate for the job.

      How well stocked are you for bananas?

  13. not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, I believe my spelling has improved because I try to learn from the spell check feature.

    1. Re:not at all by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Ewe shed knot tryst you're spill chucker.

    2. Re:not at all by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I have found the same thing. Though years of IRC and IM have definitely made me lean further and further towards typing how I speak, and further away from how I would write a formal paper. Here, I tend towards speech... because....well.... fuck the gramar and speling nazis in their asses.

      Though marrying a southie girl has actually caused me to remember many of my grammar rules.

      "Baby 'I saw' not 'I seen'"
      "fuck you" :)

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  14. Re:I have never been the first to post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep it up!... I know some day you'll succeed.

    Anonymous Coward - The #1 First Poster!!!

  15. Maybe it's this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Early onset Alzheimers? Just kidding

  16. My hand hurts by nmrtian · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I get out the fountain pen I write about two lines and my hand starts to hurt. I have to stop and use a dictionary to spell and I have to think before I write otherwise my sentenced on-run and make don't sense much.

    1. Re:My hand hurts by maxume · · Score: 1

      Well played.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  17. I find my spelling has actually improved over time by Coolwave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have always been a terrible speller it was always my least favorite part of school because it was a matter more about rote memorization and nothing to do with logic. I find the instant feed back loop from modern spell checkers, the ones that underline mistakes once I complete a word, help me to learn the correct spelling.

    My problem is even now that my spelling is better I still have no confidence in my ability to spell when I don't have that safety net.

  18. I'm getting better. by tthomas48 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My IM client (pidgin) underlines misspelled words in red, as does firefox, so I've found that my spelling has actually been getting better. I tend to actually learn the correct spelling over time.

    1. Re:I'm getting better. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've found the opposite. As I lean more and more on Firefox, Outlook, et al to validate my spelling, I start forgetting the spelling of specific rarely-used or oddly-spelled words. I just look for the red squigglies rather than stopping and thinking about the word, and possibly looking it up if I'm unsure.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:I'm getting better. by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Sometimes I get stuck on words that I have misspelled that firefox is not very good at correcting and I actually have to misspell the word *worse* in order to get it to tell me the right spelling.

      This usually happens with double letters, I just tried to type a few examples but firefox got them right but think of a longer word with two double letter pairs and I only double one of them or a word that should only have one double letter pair but I leave it single and double another letter. An example that firefox gets right would be "tomorrow" spelled as either "tommorow" or "tommorrow" (although I am a better speller than that). Whenever I find a word like that, I have to either attempt to spell it correctly which often turns out wrong or I have to bastardize the spelling to something I know is wrong for it to spit out the right spelling.

      as an aside, did anyone else find themselves making far MORE typos and spelling errors in responding to this topic than they usually make?

      --
      Bottles.
    3. Re:I'm getting better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. I know that the red line letting me know something is misspelled has been a god send and really helped with my spelling. Of course I fully admit that sometimes, it is the tactile feeling of the keys and the finger movement that helps me remember making it hard to put on paper when I actually write with a pen or pencil.

    4. Re:I'm getting better. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      >>did anyone else find themselves making far MORE typos and spelling errors in responding to this topic than they usually make?

      Know, knot ate awl.

      Wye, dew yew men yew meek moor tie poles end spilling arrows?

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    5. Re:I'm getting better. by ShadowDrgn · · Score: 1

      I was scribbling some notes on paper earlier and wondered whether I spelled a word correctly. The absence of red squiggles appearing under my hand-written text was momentarily reassuring.

    6. Re:I'm getting better. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      My spelling was improved not by the spellchecker, but by sending SMS using T9. (I think that's what it's called, when you just hit the numbers and it matches one of the three letters to a word in it's dictionary.) When I didn't hit the right numbers, the word didn't match anything in the dictionary, so I had to go back and spell it properly. Often infuriating, but usually enlightening.

    7. Re:I'm getting better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people never actually look at the correct spelling of the word though. They'll modify it to correct the spelling, but continue to type it the same way and just correct it every time using the spell check.

    8. Re:I'm getting better. by R4nneko · · Score: 1

      It becomes less useful when these apps default to the wrong dictionary. I'm sorry Colloquy and Chrome I am not going to start spelling colour incorrectly just because you keep highlighting it.

    9. Re:I'm getting better. by Arker · · Score: 1

      Odd, I find that those automatic spell-checkers throw a few dozen false alarms for every time they are right. I find them horribly annoying and turn them off immediately.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    10. Re:I'm getting better. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Silly billy, that's because your dictionary is for English, not whatever it is you spell in England. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    11. Re:I'm getting better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same here, plus some really anal IRC friends

  19. Your Jealous by Maltheus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think you're problem is their are people out they're who got better grammer then ewe and your just jealous.

    1. Re:Your Jealous by asylumx · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I think you're problem is their are people out they're who got better grammer then ewe and your just jealous.

      I get and appreciate the joke but was this sentence incredibly difficult for anyone else to read, or am I just that much of a grammar nazi?

    2. Re:Your Jealous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not that much of a Grammar Nazi if you don't know how to use proper nouns correctly.

    3. Re:Your Jealous by Again · · Score: 1

      I get and appreciate the joke but was this sentence incredibly difficult for anyone else to read, or am I just that much of a grammar nazi?

      No, me too. I am not a grammar nazi (frequently using the wrong affect/effect word) and I had numerous *twitch* moments reading the GP's sentence.

    4. Re:Your Jealous by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Not me, I was fine up to 'ewe' then had to go back to find the others.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    5. Re:Your Jealous by O-Deka-K · · Score: 1

      I you were really a grammar nazi, then you would of corrected it too.

  20. It's not the typing by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a lot of things, but not typing. Of course, tyling produces typoos, but that's not a matter of spelling, it's a matter of hitting the worng keys. A little proofreading fixes that.

    Spill chuckers oar bad four spilling. Eye wish pee pull wood stoop ewe sing them.

    Personally, when I see someone using the wrong homonym, like "the ball is in there court", it has a negative effect on my opinion of their intelligence. The same goes for the misuse of apostrophes; WHY do people think you need an apostrophe for a plural? Sometimes I'll reply with a link to the Bob the Angry Flower cartoon "Bob's quick giude to the apostrophe, you idiots".

    Maybe it's being innundated by posts from sub-adults who are texting in class instead of paying attention to the teacher.

    2 L8, brb

    1. Re:It's not the typing by moranar · · Score: 1

      it's homophone, not homonym (things that sound the same, not things that are named the same).

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    2. Re:It's not the typing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, tyling produces typoos

      I can't figure out if you did that on purpose or not...

    3. Re:It's not the typing by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Personally, when I see someone using the wrong homonym, like "the ball is in there court", it has a negative effect on my opinion of their intelligence.

      It shouldn't, though. Well, okay, systematic misuse of homonyms is one thing. On the other hand, while I tend to have decent spelling and grammar, without a doubt the most common errors I make are homonym or near-homonym substitutions. These include their/they're/there, where/wear, and a whole host of others. And make no mistake, I know full well how to use those words correctly. But they're very easy errors to make (especially if you write like I do, dictating in your head while composing), and especially difficult errors to spot if you aren't very careful when proofreading (as, again, they "sound" correct in your head). Heck, I even make the ol' it's/its mistake from time to time, and I find myself annoyed when I see someone else make that error. :)

      The real problem is that typing makes it dead easy to just hack up a piece of text without taking the care to edit and proofread properly. Personally, I tend to obsessively edit and re-edit my emails and so forth before ever hitting the "Send" button, but I suspect most people don't share the same tendency. The result is that errors simply slip through.

      Now, that said, if I ever see someone use "walla" instead of "voila", or "alot", I feel the uncontrollable urge to smack them with a trout.

    4. Re:It's not the typing by Speare · · Score: 1

      I've also resorted to Bob the Angry Flower, and even wrote a perl script that will silently fix many things I read on IRC and HTTP, so that I don't go insane.

      Typoxy: typo correction by proxy (sample image)
      Typoxy: typo correction by proxy (perl script) Typoxy: typo correction by proxy (starter ~/.typo file)

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    5. Re:It's not the typing by Flea+of+Pain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sometimes I'll reply with a link to the Bob the Angry Flower cartoon "Bob's quick giude to the apostrophe, you idiot's".

      There, fixed that for ya!

      --
      Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
    6. Re:It's not the typing by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The same goes' for the misuse of apostrophe's ...

      There, wronged it for ya.

    7. Re:It's not the typing by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Whoops, obviously I meant homophone, not homonym. Thanks a lot, OP. :)

    8. Re:It's not the typing by cekander · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although rare, sometimes you do need an apostrophe for plural. As in, "Mind your P's and Q's."

      I find typing with automatic spell-checkers has improved my ability to spell, and I would've thunk other people felt the same way.

      Bad grammar don't bother me none. Writing/speaking is about communicating with an audience. It seems the english language is way more nuanced than it needs to be to fulfill this function. The internet and the virtually unlimited networking it provides seems like the perfect ingredient to support evolution of typed languages (and friends).

    9. Re:It's not the typing by cold1s · · Score: 1

      I blame WoW trade chat........

    10. Re:It's not the typing by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. As someone who does some fiction writing on the side, mostly using low-level editors, I've always been more comfortable typing, then going back and correcting, sometimes after a few words, sometimes immediately, sometimes during proofreading. I have never once seen a fix-as-you-type spellchecker that wasn't more annoying than it was worth; typically, I'll see that I didn't write what I meant the second before the computer automatically changes it to some third spelling. Points-out-errors spellcheckers are better since they don't pretend to be smarter than you but simply ask if you're sure.

      I guess the problem I have most with it is people who actually believe the computer when it claims to be smarter than them. It puts them in a mindset where the ONLY thing they have to do is produce something vaguely meaningful so that someone else can do the hard work of making it sensible; especially if they're going to claim that they're awesome communicators (and they tend to believe that, even if they wouldn't be arrogant enough to claim it) and get angry if people disagree, it's dumbtarded to take credit for that work, especially when it's not very good. They're script kiddies of spelling.

      Or something like that.

    11. Re:It's not the typing by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a homophone! Some of my best friends sound the same!

      Things like L8 are particularly bad because they don't translate. Someone whose second language is English will read that as L and then whatever their language's word for 8 is. Other, similar, shorthands rely on phonetic English and so are very difficult for people who are not native speakers and are accustomed to different phonetics.

      I recently had a good example of this in the other direction. Someone on an open source project I work on would always sign off 'n8'. What does 'n-eight' mean? Maybe 'n-ight' with the e silent? It took me a while to remember that he was German and in German this would be 'n-acht' and the German for night is 'nacht'. Whenever you're tempted to write L8, remember that Germans will read this as lacht (which means 'laughs' in German)...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:It's not the typing by cnastase · · Score: 1

      I blame WoW trade chat........

      Long live Barrens' chat :)

      --
      Born to raise hell.
    13. Re:It's not the typing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so those people are homophonics?

    14. Re:It's not the typing by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I see something like "walla!" I think it's funny. That is: I think the person put it in there knowing it was only a vague approximation of the original. But when I see a there/they're/their substitution, or 'where' for 'were', I think the person doesn't know the difference. That tarnishes the person's credibility in my mind. That's probably not warranted: there are plenty of bright people who make spelling and grammar errors. I'm probably going off an obsolete mindset, that most people who are writing in a public space are paid to do it well, and I haven't accommodated to a world in which everyone who has an opinion can present it globally. (Emily Dickinson: "There are a lot of people reading and writing who would be better employed keeping sheep.") I base my bias on my judgment of the mistake's motivation: clever, or stupid? 'Walla' so off-base it's probably clever. Homonym substitution, probably stupid. While I understand that carelessness might let things through, at least for my own part I don't make homonym substitution errors in the first place, so (all elitist and snotty-like) I eye people who do make those mistakes warily.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    15. Re:It's not the typing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same as using a calculator, instead of your head. If you don't exercise a skill it will be lost to you. I meet many engineering graduates that are completely dependant on thier calculators. I'm not old, I did not use a slide rule in school, in fact I used a graphics calculator, but more and more it is expected that math is to be done with a calculator, just as reports are to be typed with perfect spelling using a spell checker. I find it disappointing that just because we have the technology to avoid learing something, fundemental skills are no longer necessary.

    16. Re:It's not the typing by epine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yesterday, cleaning out the back room, I stumbled across an old photo album my partner had never seen. I told her how much I hated my grade 4 year. I didn't know it at the time, but I was forced to write with a pen for the first time during the Arab Oil Embargo. For me, it was the elementary school classroom pencil and eraser embargo.

      The attractive Ms Pinder also wanted me to adopt a cursive script. I had a form of written dyslexia: letters from any word that might complete my sentence would jump the queue in the middle of whatever word I was laboriously spooling out. I couldn't slow myself down enough to use either a pencil or a pen, but at least with a pencil I had a fighting chance.

      It happens I lived in a small town just a country road away from where a classic computer nerd had grown up, long before this meme was established. He was already off in the big world helping to invent APL, but I would visit his parents and play in his old bedroom with his amazing robot cars and stuff. His father used to tell me the story about the first day he left the house after purchasing an early edition black and white television. When he came home, his son had every piece of it, down to the last tube, laid out on the living room carpet. His father described him as having the messiest room he'd ever seen (I felt I had a shot to compete with that one) but that when it came to his wires, they were laid out like he was taking dictation from God. My Dad had hung out with him leading an after school church group in his high school graduation year and he had shown my dad, who also a bit of engineering school, some mod stuff about computers.

      Since I was an easily bored child, one night when I was making trouble as an eight year old, my dad randomly started to show me stuff he had learned from D. He illustrated the binary number system with an egg carton and some black marbles. I got it right away. Afterwards, whenever I got a boring arithmetic problem in school, I would first change it to some other random base system, solve it, then change it back to decimal. OK, you wanted me to show my working, there it is. I was sending out major distress signals (hey, I'm a little bored here) but the stun wardens of the 1970s were unable to clue in.

      Ink and cursive writing and obsession with spelling drove me to new heights of frustration. For a ten year old in 1973, I had a pretty forward view of computers. I knew the spell checker was coming, I just didn't know when, or in exactly what form. The book about the nature of algorithms my dad had checked out of the university library made this clear to me: if you could define a mechanical procedure, a computer would certainly do it. The only apparent road block was actually getting my hands on such a machine. Three years later I got my hand on a TI-30, it was the best I could manage, though I did also manage to get the 8008 data sheets from a military surplus mail order outfit. I just didn't want to mow the entire subdivision all summer in order to own one, and even if I did own one, it wasn't going to spell check my essays.

      So there I am, surrounded my cultural artifacts from the future, with not much hands-on opportunity, speculating wistfully about exactly what I could get away with in school, given the future existence of these machines.

      My attitude was this: if I've managed to get enough of the right letters out of my trick fingers that the teacher unambiguously knows what word I've intended, then I've done enough. What's she ragging on me about? I was ripe for a copy of Shannon's 1948 monograph "A Mathematical Theory of Communication", which I would have devoured as a young child. I was already thinking hard about numeric representation and English words as code points in a larger representation space. The fly in the ointment, I realized, is that the homonyms would continue to be a problem long after the computers arrived. So I worked hard to spell the homonyms correctly (and the plural

    17. Re:It's not the typing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bob the Angry Flower fails to account for pluralized possession, such as "the cats' feet are out of the bag" assuming there are multiple cats and all of their feet are out of the bag.

      I don't think many people add apostrophes for no reason, such as "the cat's are out of the bag."

    18. Re:It's not the typing by kjllmn · · Score: 1

      I used to be a grammar and spelling Nazi, which probably was a symptom of my obsessive compulsive disorder. Now that it is taken care of (medicated), I write worse, spell worse, make homophonic mistakes etc, and do not care so much about whether other people write properly or not. Years of typing made no difference at all though. But being a grammar and spelling Nazi may, I take from my own experience, be about being undiagnosed, not about being correct.

    19. Re:It's not the typing by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      alot", I feel the uncontrollable urge to smack them with a trout.

      One that galls me is "noone". And the thing is that like "alot" it could actually be just a typo, not hitting the space bar hard enough. That's something I've done myself, and when I do I piss myself off!

    20. Re:It's not the typing by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Now, that said, if I ever see someone use "walla" instead of "voila", or "alot", I feel the uncontrollable urge to smack them with a trout.

      That's why I like to say "Viola!". Plus I used to play one. Of course, having taken high school French, I recognize the literal meaning of the word and that makes it easier to remember. A smattering of French, Spanish, Latin and Greek knowledge will do wonders for your spelling. I'm not even talking about studying the language, although I did study Spanish for several years. However, I never studied Latin or Greek, but I can often recognize words of those etymologies when I see them, and this helps immensely when trying to spell.

      I have found that it's perfectly possible to make homophone mistakes and apostrophe mistakes in the heat of composition... "brainos" rather than typos. Your brain misfires instead of your fingers... but it's the same thing. However, a little proofing will catch those. I will let a small number of typos slide, but more than a couple convinces me the person is illiterate, not necessarily stupid, but the two correlate pretty highly.

      Of course, the smartest person I know spells like a remedial fourth grader. He is currently a director at a large Internet corporation after having a long career as a highly-paid and well-respected consultant. He is also the most widely read person I know as well, especially in the fields of math and science. He is mostly self-educated but is an expert in more fields of computers, software and networking than I can name, and knows more about paleontology, math and physics than anyone outside of a researcher.

      Nonetheless, there is a strong correlation between not reading "real" books (and most things online do _not_ count, unless you're reading Project Gutenberg) and actually having good spelling and grammar. I wouldn't know half the obscure but cromulent words I know if I didn't see them regularly in print. Seeing proper use of the language also helps drill it into you. I'm old enough to have not been seriously exposed to computers until I was a teenagers, but there's no reason it should be worse now. Furthermore, I know that despite my good track record (I always aced English in high school and college), I know that constant reinforcement does a tremendous amount of good for my ability to communicate.

      The other thing is, if I am not completely sure about how to spell something, I look it up. That is certainly easier now than ever. Spell-checkers are fine for spotting typos, but they will not make a good speller out of a poor one. I'm happy to have a spell checker, but I certainly get along just fine without one.

      I recently saw a news commentary article that consistently used "allot" instead of "a lot". I had to wonder if that was a spell-checker suggestion, which I find to be incredibly humorous. Of course, it doesn't help that the concept of an "editor" seems to have disappeared from the face of the earth... but that's another topic.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    21. Re:It's not the typing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apostrophe Hell - it's its own worst enemy.

    22. Re:It's not the typing by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      OK, why would you need an apostrophe for Ps and Qs? Unless of course it's possessive.

      Bad grammar don't bother me none, neither. Often (especially in my /. journals) I'll use it for effect.

    23. Re:It's not the typing by OldSoldier · · Score: 1

      What's weird for me is that the wrong-homonym thing is happening for me *and I know the difference*. It's like a lazy part of my brain "hears" the word and uses the most frequently used spelling for that word and runs with it. "your" for "you're" and "there" for either "their" or "they're" are the ones I mess up most often. This doesn't happen often mind you but it's way more than I'm happy with.

      Regarding the L8R thing of SMS... once I got a cell phone with a keyboard, this has disappeared for me as it's harder now to switch to digit mode. So I find myself in this bizarre middle land (I figure for folks who get my texts) of using phrases like "C U later".

    24. Re:It's not the typing by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Ironic usernamd, since a flea kind of looks like an apostrophe! And speaking of your username, there's a joke about it. An elephant is walking through the jungle, and a flea hops on him. Something about the elephant makes the flea horney, so he slides down and starts humping the elephant.

      The elephant bumps his head on a branch and says "ow!"

      The flea says "Suffer, baby, suffer!"

    25. Re:It's not the typing by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Isaac Asimov wrote a short story about that titled The Feeling Of Power.

    26. Re:It's not the typing by turing_m · · Score: 1

      There is a cognitive cost (in quality of ideas expressed) corresponding to crappy transcription systems. If you're not getting your basic homonyms correct, you're not respecting your code points, which doesn't speak well to intellectual focus. In all cases, intelligence can transcend any limitation of the given media, if the person wishes to work hard enough, but let's be honest here: most people are so damn lazy most of the time that poor spelling becomes a valid signifier that the person didn't work hard enough to be worth a first scan, much less a second pass for deep comprehension.

      You are dead on the money. The more passes, the better my writing gets. (It's a bit like what separates an engineer from a smart kid - the engineer does enough passes over his work that he eliminates the mistakes himself.)

      I've found one of the best ways to improve my writing (besides indulging in lots of it, obviously) is to make use something like the mod system in a forum (a system of feedback) and karma whore. Then raise the bar. Aim for a +5 (or equivalent) with every post. Mark my words, the quality of your writing will improve. And as you say, it's all to do with the number of passes and the effort involved. Instead of regurgitation of thought on a page, each sentence builds a paragraph and each paragraph builds your larger point. Often complete rewrites are necessary. You will do research to double-check your thinking. Sometimes you will scrap a post because it does not cut the mustard or you find out you were wrong.

      But strangely enough, once you try this people will start thinking that you are somehow smarter than before when you really have exactly the same intelligence as before, the only difference is in what you are letting the world see.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    27. Re:It's not the typing by roscivs · · Score: 1

      Awesome. My new goal is to create grammatical sentences that are auto-"corrected" by your proxy. Buwahaha.

      --
      ~ roscivs
    28. Re:It's not the typing by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      One that galls me is "noone". And the thing is that like "alot" it could actually be just a typo, not hitting the space bar hard enough. That's something I've done myself, and when I do I piss myself off!

      Oddly enough, for all that I'm a grammar Nazi in real life (tm), things like "noone" and "alot" don't bother me. I see them (mostly correctly) as typos. And I don't hold typos against someone, since everyone does them from time to time.

      They're/there/their errors, on the other hand, causes me to think "ignorant bastard", and tune out the message - if they can't spell something that obvious correctly, odds are they won't have anything to say that's worth the fraction of my lifespan required to read it.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    29. Re:It's not the typing by Samah · · Score: 1

      Personally, when I see someone using the wrong homonym, like "the ball is in there court", it has a negative effect on my opinion of their intelligence. The same goes for the misuse of apostrophes; WHY do people think you need an apostrophe for a plural?

      A language Nazi after my own heart. I applaud thee. ;) <3

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    30. Re:It's not the typing by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Alternately, they could have been referencing a medium sized string instrument...

      Viola!

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    31. Re:It's not the typing by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that while typing I sometimes slip in a homophone (homonyms are two words spelled the same but with different meanings), but I tend to notice immediately and I always go back and correct it. I guess I tend to think of the sound of the word as opposed to the spelling. I also proof read the majority of things I type.

      Related to another post, I find that spell checkers have improved my spelling. After spelling a word incorrectly 10 to 20 times I tend to finally pick up the correct spelling.

    32. Re:It's not the typing by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 1

      Sigh, I do this too. I can't stand homonym errors (and apostrophe errors, and some kinds of comma errors) and do take them as an indication of low intelligence. A lot of why I can't tolerate them is that I take everything too literally. This means that when things quit working, I have to stop, go back, tell myself that "their" really really needs to be "there" this time, and try re-reading it. It just slows me down terribly.

      Yow, I hadn't seen that zinger from Emily -- I like it.

      And I proof-read almost everything I write, even quick chats and emails (and Slashdot posts -- oh look, Firefox recognizes Slashdot as a word). I figure it makes me look better, improves my chances of understanding myself later, and reduces the likelihood that somebody else will have to spend extra time understanding me. And it gives me nice high ground to stand on :).

      I am not against smileys in reasonable doses, and have been discovering the ";", "--", and " . . . " symbols for possibly good effect. Mainly they just make my run-on thoughts work better on the screen.

    33. Re:It's not the typing by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      I don't make homonym substitution errors in the first place, so (all elitist and snotty-like) I eye people who do make those mistakes warily.

      Aye, aye!

    34. Re:It's not the typing by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

      I don't think that spelling amongst the populace at large has become any better or worse since the internets made their first appearance; it's just that we're now subjected to so much more of the crap that people produce because they can easily publish it to a wide audience themselves. When everything was in print, it all went through legions of proofing, copy-editing and rewriting to ensure it was saying what the author/commissioner wanted it to say and reflected professionally on the publisher. Now, any idiot can throw something up and correct it later if someone complains (which is, I suppose, the same process in a roundabout way and with more arguments).

      I agree with your point with relation to our presumptions about the intelligence of the writer. I know it's shallow, but I often find myself disregarding a perfectly good argument because someone wrote 'they're' instead of 'their' and finished the sentence with 'lol' rather than punctuation.

      On a vaguely related note, the number of people who don't know how to use a thesaurus properly is staggering. I spent half an hour, once, trying to explain to someone that just because a word is listed under what you just looked up in the thesaurus doesn't mean you can swap the damned thing out! Gah. I gave up after that and let him get a D (yes, this was a while ago). Did that have anything to do with the topic? No, I just felt like a rant. Gnash, gnash.

    35. Re:It's not the typing by julie007 · · Score: 1

      Now, that said, if I ever see someone use "walla" instead of "voila", or "alot", I feel the uncontrollable urge to smack them with a trout.

      Would that make it an add homonym attack?

    36. Re:It's not the typing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm old enough to have not been seriously exposed to computers until I was a teenagers, but there's no reason it should be worse now.

      Impressive! The single mistake above was the only one I could find in your whole post. Good post, by the way.

    37. Re:It's not the typing by bkaul · · Score: 1

      In athletics, people go to ridiculous lengths to improve their performance a fraction of percent. Giving up entire good groups for years at a time. Cognitively, we treat ourselves like crap. So a person thinks "well, this texting syntax reduces my clarity of thought by 5% What's 5% anyway? Who really cares?" Yeah, and you can see the end result everywhere.

      You make some excellent points, but what are these "good groups" that athletes give up? The clarity in that paragraph seems to be reduced ...

    38. Re:It's not the typing by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Now, that said, if I ever see someone use "walla" [...] I feel the uncontrollable urge to smack them with a trout.

      I live in Walla Walla, WA, you insensitive clod!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  21. Terrible by Joebert · · Score: 1

    I've always had bad handwriting, now the only thing I write is a debt card signature and even doctors would look at it and ask "WTF is that supposed to say?".

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Terrible by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I've always had bad handwriting, now the only thing I write is a debt card signature and even doctors would look at it and ask "WTF is that supposed to say?".

      Just wait until you get PIN authentication for your debit card. I've signed my name while using my card perhaps once a year in the last few years. I sign so little stuff I now worry that I'll forget how to write my signature when I do need to.

  22. tihs hole thred wil b ful uv doodspeek by Benfea · · Score: 1

    lol wut

  23. Spelling? by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My handwriting has gone to crap, but what does that have to do with spelling? If anything, I would think that spelling would be more likely to improve, thanks to the slower pace of writing by hand. I pay more attention to what I am writing when I have to take the time to write it out by hand.

    If the quality of your writing is going down, I suspect that has to do with the quality of the writing you are consuming.

    1. Re:Spelling? by cnastase · · Score: 1

      My spelling is about the same, but I found myself "eating" letters when I write something on a piece of paper after not writing anything for some time. Thing is I'm used to typing and my brain expects the same output per amount of time (or at least that's the explanation I came up with) as when typing. What annoys me (and annoys my mom a lot more) is the fact that I used to have nice handwriting with even height letters, even spacing between words. That requires practice. My handwriting looks just awful now compared to what it was 10 years ago.

      But you are right about the quality, goes down when your read crap.

      --
      Born to raise hell.
    2. Re:Spelling? by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see if you preferentially dropped the letters that are typed by your non-writing hand. Perhaps your brain is assuming that the other hand will supply those letters, but you're only writing with one.

      My funny writing story is that when I took the GRE, they made us write a statement in cursive. I hadn't written anything in cursive since middle school at least, so I ended up having to ask the proctor how to form certain letters. She mentioned, while rolling her eyes, that it was a fairly common request. I have no idea what use it could possibly be to ETS. I heard that they use it as a handwriting sample to ensure that you are who you say you are, but I doubt I could have matched it if approached later.

    3. Re:Spelling? by cnastase · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see if you preferentially dropped the letters that are typed by your non-writing hand. Perhaps your brain is assuming that the other hand will supply those letters, but you're only writing with one.

      I honestly didn't think of that. Unfortunately I can't even check now since I had to do some handwriting lately and my hand got used to it again :) But when I make handwriting mistakes (the ones previously mentioned) it just feels like a delay in writing compared to where my brain is in composing the phrase.

      You got me thinking though.

      --
      Born to raise hell.
    4. Re:Spelling? by drdrgivemethenews · · Score: 1

      No way man. The quality of my handwriting has gone down because the handwriting Taliban chopped off my backspace finger.

    5. Re:Spelling? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      If anything, I would think that spelling would be more likely to improve, thanks to the slower pace of writing by hand. I pay more attention to what I am writing when I have to take the time to write it out by hand.

      I've noticed this, especially when I write with my left hand for a change of pace. The individual words are spelled correctly, because I am paying attention to them as I write. But I find that I drop words entirely. Not just words like "the" or "a," but adjectives and verbs too.

      Sometimes I do that when typing, too, but not as often. Probably because I can type fast enough to keep up with the "minor" words as they spool out of my brain.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    6. Re:Spelling? by shirotakaaki · · Score: 1

      My handwriting is also getting worse. It was awful before and it is almost unreadable now unless I write very slowly. So it is just easier to type things out because I imagine I type at least 5x faster than I can handwrite. As for spelling. I think it has actually gotten better due to not only typing but spelling and grammar nazis. So I guess I have found the one and only positive about them. Although I would assume 99% of people could give a shit what they say and ignore them.

  24. Spelling is fine, legibility, no by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

    My handwriting legibility is low, but my spelling and grammar isn't affected. Maybe people who allow themselves to type poorly also write poorly with a pen, but that was originally intentional, right?

  25. No by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    Handwriting vs. typing has nothing to do with grammar and spelling. Just read from quality sources and write or type with proper grammar and spelling. If you spend most of your time reading Twitter the quality of your grammar and spelling will drop whether you handwrite or type. When I was a kid we were told to read the NY Times to improve our vocabulary and grammar.

  26. My spelling got better by SlothDead · · Score: 0

    The instant spell checker and easy access to thesaurus has actually improved my spelling. Though I switched to stenography when writing on paper since I grew too impatient to use that silly letter drawing method called "writing". (If you really want to know, I use "Stiefo" where each word is one stroke and it does not work for english)

  27. True. by Poorcku · · Score: 1

    It is about perceived effort and value. Writing a full letter on traditional paper involves the increased effort to foresee what will be written down, so that once in the middle of the letter you won't have to go back and correct it (which implies writing it all over again). This "fear" of errors decreases the likelihood of committing them. Topic, orthography, grammar and even calligraphy (which increases the likelihood of your message getting across) are all helped by this conscious effort. Whereas typing on a machine has made our lives easier in the sense of mass producing shit :) and tons of unneeded documents, but has severely diminished our abilities to write a simple sentence down on a piece of paper without making a fool of ourselves. Moreover, consider that in an organization almost 80% (citation needed) of all documents are all templates, the only requirement being the changing of some header or the person receiving this memo or whatnot. LOL :)

    --
    I take my children to see Madonna(..), but I never for once ever thought I was in the same business.Chris Rea.
    1. Re:True. by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      This "fear" of errors decreases the likelihood of committing them. Topic, orthography, grammar and even calligraphy (which increases the likelihood of your message getting across) are all helped by this conscious effort.

      I attended grammar school in Germany, where—at least at the time—what you describe was pretty much the official teaching philosophy—only, you needn't put quotes around the word fear. It was more like mortal terror. Yes, we were taught by real grammar Nazis![1]

      In first grade, we got a slate with a chalk-like stylus. You cleaned the slate with a wet sponge. Easy, forgiving, and economical. Second grade came as quite a shock: suddenly, we were made to write everything in notebooks with a fountain pen. It was a capital offense to *gasp* tear out a page, so any mistakes you made in your composition book lived to shame you forever. I'm quite sure the fear factor made it worse; I was so afraid of making mistakes that I couldn't keep my mind on what I was supposed to be writing.

      1. OK, I'm exaggerating. I'm pretty sure that none of my teachers was an actual Nazi. This was the 50s, and the Nazis had all mysteriously disappeared in something grownups referred to as "the war", but never talked about.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  28. PINs and other codes by KJ+the+Wanderer · · Score: 2

    I can't say that my speeling has gotten any worse the more I type, but something I have noticed is I cannot for the life of me remember any of my PINs or other such codes. My fingers know where to go while I'm at the console, but the last time I was asked for the code to disable my security system I could not for the life of me remember four numbers. Had to dial the phone to figure it out.

    --
    This signature intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:PINs and other codes by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I can't say that my speeling has gotten any worse

      You mean you always have misspelled "spelling"? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:PINs and other codes by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I've personally found that ten-keying a number will help me remember it (e.g. a phone number). The only drawback is not remembering the actual number and having to make fluttering motions with your fingers when you need to remember it again...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  29. Not quite what you think ... by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

    I'm a pretty decent touch typist, about 300 characters per minute. My spelling and grammar are quite good, even in my second language (English).

    Putting pen to paper however, does give me the same effect that you're having, but not quite as you describe it. It's not that I suddenly don't know how to write certain words - it's just that I'm used to writing them at 300 characters per minute, but using a pen I can probably only do 60. In other words, I have to slow down my thinking.

    This results in badly spelled words which does look like I'm somewhat dyslexic, but when I focus on being slow, I don't have an issue when using a regular pen. Doing this is highly frustrating - it feel like you're an idiot, which only exacerbates the issue.

    I've seen the exact same thing happen in people who aren't used to using a keyboard. My parents are very used to writing things by hand and can probably write 100+ characters per minute that way, but give them a keyboard and they are slowed to a crawl and their error rate soars.

    As for IRC, IM, SMS etc. lowering your standards? 4 sre. Y wrt fll wrd whn u cn sve tm?

    You can't make other people write proper English (or whatever language) if they don't want to. All you can do is write it properly yourself. If you want to be a smart ass, you can always correct their writing for them if they're talking to you. Or pretend (or as the case may be, not) that you haven't the faintest idea what they're trying to say.

    Once you make people realise, that they aren't saving time by not writing full words (or the like), they'll either stop bugging you (and thus won't detract from your own abilities) or they'll start writing properly again.

    Just hit them over the head a few times when they write stuff like "I should of done", "Its not you're fault" or some of the similar mistakes. But let me hear that you through a thrown threw a window, understood?

  30. Use it or lose it by MalikyeMoon · · Score: 1

    I force myself to spell correctly (even when typing) and can't stand what I read within MMOs, or even in the workplace most of the time these days. I also try to never use a calculator, and it allows me to retain my ability to compute in my head. The grammatical ability of the average person I game with is just atrocious. I am chastised for correcting people with "what are you an English teacher?". What they don't realize however is that to the rest of the world, they sound ignorant. I do find that I type quite a bit faster than I write these days. My writing was never great, but it has definitely declined. More importantly, I tried to write in cursive not long ago, and realized that my brain/hands have forgotten some of the letters. If you don't use it, you might not lose it entirely, but you do lose your proficiency!

  31. So? by vertinox · · Score: 1

    If you need to have good handwriting to earn a living you a probably working for a greeting card company doing the inserts.

    For everyone else... It is just faster and more economical to type.

    Yes, with the advent of the auto-spell checker, you don't have to often memorize certain spellings but in a business environments where deadlines are looming, do you need to whip out a dictionary every time you need to write an email?

    For a car analogy, think of how people who never learned how to use a manual and only drove automatics. Yes, their manual shifting skills are somewhat degraded, but if they can drive a car fine then who are we to say they need to learn how to use a stick.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:So? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I re-read my first sentence and feel a sense of irony creeping in. That said... No one pays me to post on slashdot so it really doesn't matter.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  32. Is this a confession? by joocemann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is the point of this confession or whatever it seems to be? Do you want my attention? Do you want me to agree with you? I don't... I've been typing and using the interwebz for about 14 years now with plenty of IRC, 1337 speak, and degenerate behavior --- and in all that I have maintained my cognitive capacity to recognize the difference between the variants and the proper.

    I think your problem (if you feel there is any, such as an employer wondering why you write like a 12 year old), probably stems from the lack of regard for your variance as 'variance', and embracing that way too often, if not completely, as a way of life.

    In excess, nearly anything can be problematic. Maintain a balance between work and play; in this case having a deliberate regard for maintaining both your interwebz-bs-style and your proper-for-work-and-standards style.

    What I mean is... you need to actually give a shit about what you're doing. Degenerate yourself for fun, but not for habit.

    1. Re:Is this a confession? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Very well put!

    2. Re:Is this a confession? by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      I like this response. I seldom use spell checkers myself. I have definitely noticed that many people online can't be bothered to try to spell correctly or give a second thought to grammar. If the Internet has done anything to my spelling, it's that I tend to use American spellings of words despite living in Canada. Many times it's a conscious decision based on the audience I'm writing to.

      But the closing line of the parent post sums it up well. If you deliberately try to do something correctly, you will maintain or even improve your skills at it. Don't simply take it for granted that you can spell and properly use English just because it's your native tongue.

    3. Re:Is this a confession? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I'd go even further than that and say that if you surround yourself with people who aren't interested in spelling, grammar, or punctuation, your skills will drop. The reverse is also true, and there are many communities on the internet where all of those skills are still important.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:Is this a confession? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Degenerate yourself for fun,

      Hey, I always do that!

    5. Re:Is this a confession? by steelfood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very insightful post, and by far the most insightful comment I've read today. But you missed a crucial point:

      you need to actually give a shit about what you're doing.

      If he actually gave a shit, he wouldn't be bitching and moaning about his decadence and instead, well, be doing something about it. The fact that this appears on Ask Slashdot means that this guy doesn't give a rat's ass, and only is trying to figure out what to point his finger at when his inability to create complete sentences or spell bites him in the ass.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    6. Re:Is this a confession? by lannocc · · Score: 1

      Well said. I fully agree!

    7. Re:Is this a confession? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here hear!

  33. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your problem isn't that it's rote memorization -- I'm terrible at anything requiring rote memorization. Your problem (and a lot of other peoples') is you don't read enough books. I urge you and everyone else to acquaint yourselves with you local public library, or if you're in college, its library.

    Readaholics never have trouble with spelling, unless all they read is the internet.

  34. I've found the opposite by Hungry_Myst · · Score: 1

    My spelling and hand writing are absolutely atrocious, and would be with or without computers as I'm mildly dyslexic (this has been tested and documented). In the case of my spelling however, I've found it improving as I use computers. When I have a spell check constantly telling me what I'm doing wrong and how to fix it, eventually some things stick. It doesn't work for everything (such as using the wrong word with the right spelling), but it helps. Not to mention being able to hand in work that's nicely typed and legible, something that would be difficult for me otherwise.

  35. No by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
    Spelling is not something I do with my brain. It's something that happens somewhere near the top of the spinal cord. My brain sends words to my fingers and on the way my motor functions translate the word into a sequence of muscle impulses that correspond to the keys I press to make the word. This is exactly what happens to people who write a lot with a pen too, only with muscle impulses for moving a pen, rather than for pressing buttons on a keyboard. My mother, for example, can't spell complex words aloud if you ask her to, but can write them down with the correct spelling if you give her a pen and paper. I type more words in a day than I write in a year, so I've given up caring about my handwriting.

    As for the quality of your grammar deteriorating, that's probably caused by reading things written by chimps. An infinite number of chimps on an infinite number of typewriters will write the complete works of Shakespeare eventually, but a few dozen on IRC won't.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  36. Ummm what? by SraL · · Score: 1

    Aren't both handwritten and typed words spelled the same??? So whats the issue?

  37. It's a matter of basics. by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

    I became very aware of grammar and spelling in high school. To that end I integrated it into my life. Typing has successfully kept my writing messy and I do find myself having to slow down the brain to write some stuff. If you stick to the fundamentals and apply them while typing, you should have no problems. Practice!

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  38. It's called School. They teach writing there. by Garbad+Ropedink · · Score: 1

    Didn't you go to school? You spend a good 12 years of your life writing on paper pretty much every day. When you hit university you become a master at writing by hand. The only real option is that you were never good at writing to begin with.

    It's not like leetspeak was invented by some English professor who just sat down at a computer one day and said 'hey replacing letters with numbers is a lot easier than just using regular words'. It was invented by dumbass kids who weren't any good in school, never read books and played video games all the time. Really, is that the sort of environment where great literary minds flourish?

    --
    And that was the last Terry Fox run I ever participated in.
    1. Re:It's called School. They teach writing there. by Vovk · · Score: 1

      4k7[_]aLly, \/\/12iT1[\]g 1n "1337" |s aL07 m04R |)1FfiK[_]Lt t[-]4n "Traditional" 7yP1|\|9.

    2. Re:It's called School. They teach writing there. by Again · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is, I can read that just fine.

    3. Re:It's called School. They teach writing there. by Garbad+Ropedink · · Score: 1

      Error! Error! Does not compute!

      --
      And that was the last Terry Fox run I ever participated in.
  39. Telex? I missed the reference. by Zinho · · Score: 1

    Could someone explain how "Telex machines" date the submitter? Wikipedia isn't much help on this.

    Thanks!

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    1. Re:Telex? I missed the reference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They date him the same way a calling copies "photostats" date someone. Also, who uses Telex anymore? If you really have to send something on paper, you use a fax machine.

    2. Re:Telex? I missed the reference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this context => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegraphy#Telex -- you'll see the reference is to an obsolete technology.

      I believe it was also the "mojo" they refer to in the movie Almost Famous (used at Rolling Stone).

    3. Re:Telex? I missed the reference. by apenzott · · Score: 1

      Could someone explain how "Telex machines" date the submitter? Wikipedia isn't much help on this.

      Thanks!

      You are probably looking for the electromechanical tele-printers ( see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleprinter#Teletype for one example. )

      These devices used a keyboard (if present) for input and the output was mechanically printed onto roll-fed paper. Usually they were used on-line to either a computer (or computerized piece of manufacturing equipment) or in "local mode".

      When in "local mode" these machines would often include a (paper) tape reader and tape punch. Often the resultant punch tape was hand carried and fed into another piece of computerized hardware.

      --
      The Roman Rule: The one who says it cannot be done shall not interrupt the one who is doing it.
  40. Muscle Memory by BurzumNazgul · · Score: 1
    I've noticed the same thing in my own writing. When I type I think of the whole word I want to create and my fingers enter it on the keyboard. I don't think of the individual letters I'm typing if it's a common word.

    For example: If I'm trying to write the word calender I always forget how many a's and e's to use. When I'm typing I think the word 'calender' and my fingers seem to remember how the word is spelled.

    If you've ever watched a spelling be (don't pretend you haven't) you'll have noticed that the contestants will sometimes trace the words out on the back of their cards.

    --
    I can say [REDACTED] anytime I want!
  41. Very true by Novotny · · Score: 1

    I used to be very proud of my handwriting. It now looks like the work of a drunken four year old.

    1. Re:Very true by Again · · Score: 1

      I don't think four year old kids should be drinking enough to get drunk. ...just saying.

  42. handwriting is painful... by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

    I rarely hand-write anything anymore, and find that although I can type over 80wpm, I can barely hand-scratch an illegible paragraph without significant hand pain. My writing quality - and even my signature - has gone downhill over the last 10 years to the point where it's almost useless.

    What I think is now putting it over the edge is that I broke my thumb, and although it's now healed, it's painful to properly grip a pen. In the old days, forcing myself to write would have probably been enough physio therapy to help that, but I do it so seldom now, it just keeps me from trying.

    If we have a nuclear war and all our electronics get toasted, we're in trouble...

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    1. Re:handwriting is painful... by Again · · Score: 1

      I rarely hand-write anything anymore, and find that although I can type over 80wpm, I can barely hand-scratch a legible paragraph without significant hand pain. My writing quality - and even my signature - has gone downhill over the last 10 years to the point where it's almost useless.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:handwriting is painful... by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      >>Fixed that for you.

      No, actually, you didn't...

      I can barely accomplish it, and it's not legible when it's finished. Your version may seem logical, but it's incorrect. Thanks for playing the "grammar nazi" game, better luck next time. :)

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  43. google is ruining my ability to spell by peter303 · · Score: 1

    When I'm guessing, I type it into the little google text box to double-check. Thats more reliable than a spell-checker.

    1. Re:google is ruining my ability to spell by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      I do that all the time.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  44. Can't say I have that problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my job I spend all 8-9 hours in front of a computer. Typing for the vast majority of that time, like was said above, Firefox is kind enough to tell me I spelled something incorrectly. Several years ago I used a chat client that spell checked on the fly in the same way (can't remember which one it was). Those pieces of software are what made me the spelling master I am today.

    Now my handwriting, that's a different story. Since the only person who ever sees my hand written notes is myself, it looks more like a Pollock painting than a manuscript.

  45. Yes. by calspach · · Score: 1

    I think it has, I know that I at least rely more on spellcheck than I should. Especially with the autocorrect, at least when it just does a squiggly line I have to look at the correct spelling from a list of possibles. When it just automatically fixes my teh's to the's, there is no reason for me to change the way I type. What would scare me is to turn off spellcheck for a day. I wonder if I would even be able to respond to emails from my co-workers. And the children, they are even worse off, they are growing up with this kind of correction, giving them no incentive to learn to spell.

    1. Re:Yes. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      When it just automatically fixes my teh's to the's, there is no reason for me to change the way I type.

      Agreed; I hate that. Just tell me I've made the error, please (probably a typo), and I'll either backspace and correct it or I'll right-click and choose the correct word from the menu.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  46. Schools still in the dark ages by Trip6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about where you live, but the school curriculums I see are not doing nearly enough to prepare our kids for a lifetime of typed communication, which they surely face. Penmanship, while still important, is the only way kids are being taught in most schools. It's time to teach kids to be proficient typists and spellers using keyboards to at least the same extent as old fashioned written communication.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  47. Great, but who cares? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing people bemoan the loss of technology that has been overshadowed by computers... why? Why is writing by hand special? The whole point is to get information down in some way, and using a keyboard to type it into a computer is superior in every way. If you say that it makes it less human you are simply begging the question -- how do you define "human" and why is it necessarily a good thing? If you went back in time an asked an australopithecine how they felt about evolving into homo sapiens, they would be terrified and try to do everything they could to remain australopithecines. Why are we so afraid of change when it could be so beneficial to us and our ancestors?

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    1. Re:Great, but who cares? by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      Because I can write on a wall, a post-it, paper, or any other surface my Sharpie/pen/pencil will scribble on. It's not convenient to have everything plugged into a keyboard.

      Regardless of what you're writing on, spelling is important. It really gets under my skin when I hear, "I don't need to know how to spell, the computer fixes it for me." Really? Just like I don't need to know math, since computers are mathematical machines that can do all the for me, right? It scares me to think that we may be entering an age where the average politician can't spell without a computer to correct him and can't solve a simple calculation without a computer to do it for him. How are we to deal with abstract concepts such as those in politics without a firm grasp on the fundamentals?

      Hell, Macs have come with good old "Fred" to read any passage of text to us since System 7. Does that mean we should abandon this archaic reading practice? After all, the computer can do it for us. . .

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    2. Re:Great, but who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking for myself, my hand writing is really bad. I thinks it's a problem of skills not evolution, in the future if we lose the skill to write, this generally reduces our ability to communicate, in multiple formats. Just as if we use calculators to do the math, we lose the comprehension of what the numbers mean. I'm sure that writing and math are not going to be lost to society, but society as a whole is worse off with that loss in intelegence. This has already de-valued a highschool education, 30 years ago a high school education was an acceptable level of learning, because we were willing to fail people if they didn't meet a minimum standard. Now we lower the standards to make everyone pass, such as using calculators, now making college a standard for acceptable education. Having technology is no excuse for ignorance and stupidity.

    3. Re:Great, but who cares? by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Two reasons :

      1) The summary says that he finds it hard to write because he knows where the letters are on the keyboard. Which implies the actual letters are becoming less a notation and more a function which always resides in the same place. This leads to not knowing how the function works, only where you find it. Similar to using a GUI to admin a server opposed to over an SSH session. Unless you build the commands yourself, you don't really have to know what's going on, just the expected result. Great for employing monkeys. But that leads to poor grammar and spelling, because the underlying theory of writing is being ignored over the mechanical fact of doing it. I miss the backspace sometimes though !

      2) ELECTRICITY. Do you really want to place every piece of knowledge under the ultimate power of something you have to pay to generate, just to keep it accessible ?

      I think writing by hand is important if only to be able to do it. I would hate to put myself at a possible future disadvantage, by not being able to do something so basic. Like people who can't add up without a till. OK they know which buttons to press, but they have barely the vaguest idea of what's going on inside the box. Is that acceptable behaviour for a supposedly civilised society ? I don't thinks it's cool to be publicly stupid though - YMMV.

  48. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may have alzheimers, but at least I don't have alzheimers.

  49. Ruined? by blg42 · · Score: 1

    "Ruining" would imply that my ability was at least marginally good to begin with...

  50. Bad summary by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 1

    The question posed in the body is whether typing has ruined your ability to write things out by hand -- either printing or writing.

    For me the answer to that question is yes.

    But most people seem to be responding about their ability to spell. In that respect the only thing I've noticed really is that certain words have become hard-wired and I might think "their" but between my brain and the keyboard, "there" is what comes out and I have to back up and correct it.

    I've also heard that message sent by the brain to different fingers travel at different speeds. Thus when I'm typing furious furiously, i, o, and u often don't come out in the correct order and I'll have to correct again.

  51. Script, Block and Type by ipoverscsi · · Score: 1

    Typing is much faster than writing, but I find that typing all day does not affect my ability to spell when writing by hand. In fact, because hand-writing is more permanent (there is no backspace), I find its slower pace actually improves the way I write, for I have to spend more time thinking rather than just typing and correcting.

    No doubt others will be in a similar position when I say that my script writing (cursive) looks terrible, but that is merely a lack of practice. Bad script is not a modern invention, however: while at a naval museum in Virginia, I could not decipher the captain's log book for all of his chicken-scratchings.

    My block printing is readable, albeit very small --- I write in an eight-point font.

    My biggest lament about computers and the Internet is that they have reduced the already small working-set of words to what may truly be the lowest common denominator. There are many fine words in the English language that I would love to use regularly but cannot because people don't know their definitions or dismiss me as an arrogant SOB for using big words. The flip side is that when people can't spell "definitely" (definatley) or "lose" (loose), I immediately stop reading and disregard their comments regardless of quality or pertinence.

    1. Re:Script, Block and Type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many fine words in the English language that I would love to use regularly but cannot because people don't know their definitions or dismiss me as an arrogant SOB for using big words. The flip side is that when people can't spell "definitely" (definatley) or "lose" (loose), I immediately stop reading and disregard their comments regardless of quality or pertinence.

      Same here, but I'll add, "couple things". This is an example of malicious illiteracy, rather than gross ignorance, which is flagitious not simply execrable.

  52. It's not typing... by jridley · · Score: 1

    Being sloppy and not paying attention to spelling has reduced your ability to spell.
    Typing something versus writing it with a pen is no excuse for bad grammar and spelling.

    If this really worries you, how about spelling things properly when you're typing? The world will thank you.

  53. Re:I have never been the first to post. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to? No matter how funny, insightful, or interesting, a first post is almost guaranteed to be modded down. If you have excellent karma it shouldn't matter (karma to burn, baby!), but it still does, because a comment that's modded to oblivion won't be seen by anyone, so why bother posting it at all?

    In this case I'm modding myself down with the "no karma bonus" because it's only directed to you, and you'll see it in your "comments" notification.

  54. Obligatory Indiana Jones quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you don't read enough books.

    It tells me... that goose-stepping morons like yourself... should try reading books instead of burning them!!

    1. Re:Obligatory Indiana Jones quote by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      So should you Mr AC because you don't know how to use ellipses properly.

  55. Perhaps by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

    I'll add +1 to your sample. To be honest, I've noticed my spelling becoming much poorer both in script and in type. For me there is also a transpositioning of both letters and sometimes words, which sounds almost like a facet of dyslexia (I don't have other features of dyslexia that I know of). I don't know what the cause is, but my guess would have been automatic spell-checkers making it unnecessary to think about whether a word is correctly spelled or not.

    --
    If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    1. Re:Perhaps by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post, but I meant to include that I think heavy computer use has had other effects as well; such as shortening my attention span.

      Hmm.

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
  56. FingerWorks TouchStream by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a multitouch keyboard that does dynamic spelling correction based on what you've already typed, what you type next (it issues backspaces to correct prior keystrokes), and the fractional location of a finger-tap within or between key areas. It's slick beyond words. Apple bought the tech, and is ever-so-slowly dribbling it out in their iPhone/iPod Touch and trackpads.

    1. Re:FingerWorks TouchStream by Bandman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure I would stab that keyboard in short order. Unless it knows unix commands, of course.

    2. Re:FingerWorks TouchStream by sharperguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      u r untitled to ur opinum but my spellin is a gd as evr!!!!1

      --
      "sudo rm -rf your-face"
    3. Re:FingerWorks TouchStream by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Luckily for him, he's not using it to develop Perl, because that keyboard would probably get confused looking at something like

      s/(^AB@H)?^&(D@DZsaivb*)rfhoi;13[ab]+/(\1)dn21\2/g;

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:FingerWorks TouchStream by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      $ man stab
      No manual entry for stab

      I don't get it. How do you stab /dev/tty?

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  57. It's inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spelling mistakes and bad grammar are inevitable. There are several factors at work that make us more conscious of them.

    First, we have less time or take less time to review what we have written. This isn't as bad as it sounds, because it is partially the result of the second factor; We write orders of magnitude more today than we did in the past. This is a very good thing. If people are constantly practicing writing and are conscious of their mistakes, we may end up with a whole generation of excellent writers.

    Unfortunately there is the third factor. Your mistakes are more noticeable because you contrast your writing to ppl that right lik this they have no clue about speling or gramar or punctuaton they think its ok to right trash like this becuz its easy for them they dont think about the reader

    Odds are your writing is not any worse on the computer than it would be if you only wrote by hand. You're just less likely to have time to correct mistakes, make more total mistakes because you do more writing, and are more sensitive to it because of the junk some people create. Just maintain some self-consciousness about your writing and some respect for the reader, and you could easily end up a better writer than you would have otherwise.

  58. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is true. I read (er, have read..) so much that I automatically can tell when something's misspelled. It's really quite handy.

  59. My handwriting has ALWAYS been crap by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    and I've had the opposite experience of the OP. Word processing has increased my typing speed by 50% over typewriters. (I type with three or four fingers at 60wpm, too fast to consider learning the right way.) I've become a better speller because I get instant feedback when I screw up. I've learned not to use 'white out' on the screen. Grammar? Nothing is going to help you if you can't get your words in the right places or understand to use a plural verb after a conditional. SURELY you don't rely on 'grammar checker' to bitch at you for using passive voice. It's useless.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:My handwriting has ALWAYS been crap by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      use a plural verb after a conditional

      What?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:My handwriting has ALWAYS been crap by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Correct English uses a plural verb after a conditional statement. For example, correct grammar is to say, "If I were an optimist, I'd blah blah." "If I WAS an optimist..." is incorrect. The word "if" triggers the plural verb. "Whether" is another example. In English vulgate people often use the latter form simply because they don't know any better. You'd probably find it in a descriptive dictionary, but you'd never find it in a prescriptive dictionary, such as Webster's Second.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    3. Re:My handwriting has ALWAYS been crap by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Ah, I was trying to think of what a "plural verb" was and wasn't coming up with much. I'd forgotten verbs of being.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:My handwriting has ALWAYS been crap by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      :-) Actually, your phrase brought back memories. I had to memorize the 'helping verbs' in junior high (1960?) "is be am are was were been has have had do does did may might can could shall should will would must." Of course, I can't remember yesterday.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    5. Re:My handwriting has ALWAYS been crap by KingOfTheDustBunnies · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not a plural verb; it's a subjunctive verb.

      "If I were an optimist" and "If I was an optimist" are both correct, but they mean different things.

      If I was an optimist when I was younger, it was only because I had seen too little of the world. If I were an optimist now, I would think it likely that you would return to this thread and read my reply despite the intervening hours.

    6. Re:My handwriting has ALWAYS been crap by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the clariication, I think. It just happens that the plural verb and the 'subjunctive case' are exactly the same word and are indistinguishable exceot in theory. When I read about subjunctive case, it makes my head hurt, yet I can do it without thinking the same way my dog can catch every ball I throw, yet neither of us can come up with the trigonometric equation that 'proves' it. I think that begs the question of what 'knowledge' is. I hope I'm not being pedantic, which I almost accused you of being. :-)

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    7. Re:My handwriting has ALWAYS been crap by KingOfTheDustBunnies · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the great thing about English verb conjugations: so many of the forms are identical. And I think it's only in the forms of to be that the past subjunctive differs from the indicative. My grandfather used to say, "If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs." Both hads are subjunctive, but it hardly matters.

      Of course they don't teach grammar in English classes, so most of my knowledge of the subjunctive mood is ported from Spanish. This means that there's always a chance that some more powerful grammarian could come along and tell me I'm confunded about something.

      And by all means feel free to call me a pedant. Just don't say it like it's a bad thing. :)

  60. You could always try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spell correcting pens.

  61. Yes by kalirion · · Score: 1

    Just like IDEs have ruined people's ability to write syntactically correct code.

  62. Same boat by greymond · · Score: 1

    I don't consider myself "old", but I'm 30 and from the time I started Junior High through college all my reports had to be typed and saved on a floppy (lol), by my Senior year of High School everything needed to be saved on a zip and by College I was taking my class notes on my laptop just to save time and it was easier to do a "find" in a word document that sift through actual paper notebooks.

    My career choices didn't help being in the creative industry for 10 years now where I spend all day long creating graphics and laying out text for multiple projects I have no need to "manually write down anything" - if you catch me in the hallway, I'll just thumb type the notes in my Blackberry's memo pad...

    But there is a down side I suppose. I have trouble signing my name sometimes as well as if I have to fill a form out at the doctors office it's nearly illegible, so I find I have to rely on my wife or friends to "write" stuff for me as they tend to have less computer experience and therefore better handwriting.

  63. Used to hate writing by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    I used to hate writing. First of all, I'm left handed so writing with a pen often meant ink stains on my hand and smeared handwriting. Secondly, I never felt that my handwriting speed could keep up with my brain speed. I'd always have to slow down my thoughts to get them on paper. Finally, I also couldn't easily make edits to my writing. Deciding to reword a sentence or move a paragraph meant ugly looking cross outs, hard-to-write-over white-out or completely rewriting the page I was working on.

    Then, I got to type on a computer for the first time. Suddenly, there were no ink stains, my typing speed was better able to keep pace with my thinking speed, and edits were a quick cut/copy/paste away. Suddenly, I found that I loved writing and wrote anytime I could.

    I still can write pen on paper but whenever possible I compose my writing on the computer first so my pen-on-paper writing is as neat as possible.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  64. It's IRC by savanik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, I'm going to have to say that IRC is to blame here. Poor typing is endemic on IRC, and is even worse on Second Life, where the graphics detract from the online communication.

    If you want to increase or maintain your English skills, socialize with people who put an emphasis on proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Without those fundamentals in the people around you, your dialogue will eventually sink to match their levels.

    If you're wondering, yes, this would probably be considered elitist by many online neophytes. I personally prefer to call it 'having standards'. :)

  65. Instant gratification? by Rastl · · Score: 1

    I too rely on the little red line under a word that may be misspelled. I try to find and correct my own mistakes as I type since I can 'feel' them as I go. But I've gotten to rely on the built in spell checker to make sure.

    Has using electronic communication affected my handwriting? Not really. I tend to write out notes to myself all the time when I'm working and I will occasionally sit down and write letters. I agree with some of the posters above that having to hand write something makes me sit and think things out to their logical conclusion since I can't easily delete and rewrite.

    I've also found a reverse effect. People aren't used to reading cursive any more. Printing is just fine but when I write a letter in cursive I get comments that they have trouble reading it. I've checked my handwriting and it really isn't bad enough to put the blame completely on me.

    One other thing I've found is that writing a letter isn't as easy as it used to be since anything I write will be 'stale' once it is received. Electronic communication is immediate and fresh. So my letters have to deal with subject matter that generally isn't addressed in e-mails or I know that it will be a repeat of something at some point.

    Letters are a dying art. Getting a real letter (not just a greeting card with a sentence or two) happens so rarely these days that it is treated as an oddity.

  66. Ditto - submitter is describing 'body memory' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been typing since the mid 70s. I've certainly lost the ability to write quickly, and legibility has sunk, but spelling hasn't been a problem.

    Sounds like the submitter remembers spelling based on the hand's body memory. It's much more common to notice this with PINs -- you can't remember your number until you visualize, or physically enact, the sequence on a keypad.

    This used to be normal with phone numbers too, but we seldom punch or dial numbers anymore, so we no longer have an associated 'finger dance' for oft-called numbers.

  67. Hooray for meetings! by superflippy · · Score: 1

    I suppose I can thank our weekly team meetings for helping keep my handwriting skills up to snuff. I always take notes at the meetings so I can remember what we talked about and make to-do lists. Sometimes, the meetings become long and tedious, but now when I feel myself itching to look at the clock I can just remember that I'm practicing an important skill: writing on paper with a pen. And I'll know it's all worth it.

    --
    Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  68. Yes, I cannot write by hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, my handwriting ability is almost completely gone. I recently got married and had to write a lot of thank yous by hand. It took me forever (more than 20 hours) both because I had to proceed so slowly and because I had to re-do about 1 in 3 because I would make a mistake halfway through.

  69. Handwriting's ok, but spell checking unpredictable by CCTalbert · · Score: 1

    I've found that while my handwriting and spelling abilities haven't suffered too much, I do tend to type sloppily and count on spell checking to clean things up afterward. But this has led to some funny mistakes.

    I got an email back from a friend once asking "How did you know I was having problems shitting?!?!?" I was totally stumped and confused, and he finally had to rub my nose in it, told me to actually read my original email. In regards to an issue I was working with him to resolve, I had meant to type "Sorry about the inconvenience", had typo-ed, and Outlook had helpfully corrected it to "Sorry about the incontinence".

    Totally changed the tone of the email.

  70. WTF is wrong with you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Writing is writing. Your writing consists of your words, the words that come from you. The written part is merely an encoding. You could have just as well spoken them or blinked them in morse code, provided you know those encodings. If you write well on a keyboard, know the how to use a pen, and have no physical ailments, you should be able to write the same way on paper. Maybe it will take you some extra time. Maybe you won't remember the spellings of words because you are used to thinking in terms of sequences of positions on a keyboard. But your language capacity and eventual ability to recall these things is not affected.

    Grammar is the structure of language. It has nothing inherently to do with writing. When you speak, you are using grammar. Now, your particular speech or your particular writing may follow grammatical rules that differ from generally accepted usage. If you are used to a particular usage, that may make it more challenging to produce something that conforms to an educated standard of intelligibility. But grammar is very much orthogonal to writing.

    So what you are saying is... The fact that you've moved from keyboard to pen has made it less easy for you to use a pen. But does that change your spelling ability? I don't think so. If you're a bad speller you're a bad speller. Quite a different thing is if you remember how to spell stuff based on how it is on the keyboard; you know the spellings but it takes some time to transcribe from one encoding to the next. Further, if you have some "problem" with grammar, I would point out that you could develop similar "problems" simply by.. say.. moving into an area where English isn't the primary language. I know from experience that you might start to adopt grammatical idiosyncrasies from the population that surrounds you. Maybe that's an immigrant neighborhood that influences you. Maybe it's an IRC channel. Does that make your grammar "worse"? That's a completely subjective call and has absolutely nothing to do with your ability or disability to write.

  71. Some personal observations by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    When I was in school one of our school's best spellers was a guy who was a pretty average student. He would sometimes win spelling contests in the school and represent us in regional contests (I don't think he ever made it further than state level), but his academic record was pretty ordinary. I knew him for years and considered him a friend, although not a close one, and I can say that I just think he was a pretty average student. He was no genius. That experience convinced me that people who can spell well may not necessarily be the best and brightest.

    From personal experience, the more I studied foreign languages (I am reasonably proficient in 3 besides English), the worse my ability to spell English became. I noticed a definite correlation there. However, I think my grammar improved. I use dictionary.com sometimes to look up words I am unsure about, but I write better than most people I know. I'm always surprised at how many people, especially younger ones, have no idea what the difference is between there, their and they're. That's just one example. As a point of interest, foreign language speakers who study English won't confuse there/their/they're, your/you're and its/it's, but they'll do things like write "could of" when it's really "could've" because they are going by what they hear. They are not helped when idiot native speakers write "could of" or "use to" (it's "used to") though.

    1. Re:Some personal observations by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I could care less.
      (Ugh that was painful to type.)

    2. Re:Some personal observations by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I cringed when I read that. At least I hardly ever hear it spoken, as in British English it's, "I couldn't care less". (I think I hear, "I don't give a damn/shit/fuck" more though.)

    3. Re:Some personal observations by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Usually when spoken it's said with a tone that reveals you in fact couldn't care less... thus indicating that it's meant in a sarcastic sense.

      When written, the sarcasm is a bit less obvious, but that's still the way I've always thought it should be correctly interpreted. Sarcasm often says the opposite of its meaning, e.g. "Yeah right" when they're obviously and completely wrong.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  72. Handwriting by ledow · · Score: 1

    It's called evolution. We developed a tool to save time, can mass-produce that tool in a standardised format and find it infinitely preferable to older alternatives. I can type over 100WPM. I can write *legibly* about 15-20, faster if only I have to read it. That's about as much as could ever be said for my handwriting, anyway: legible.

    My mother once complained to my primary school (aged about 8) that the teachers were saying my handwriting wasn't good enough. Her rule was, if it was good enough for the teacher to tell if the answer was right or wrong, then it wasn't a problem. The teachers disagreed until she visited, but soon relented. I think that's saved me a lot of unnecessary hassle over the years. I think it's also entirely correct. If I'm not writing it for other people, it doesn't matter. If I'm writing it for other people, it matters that they can read it. If I'm writing for *display*, that's another matter entirely. I can't remember the last time that was necessary.

    I communicate. How I do it is to use the most convenient medium. In the same way that people decried the demise of the quill, or stone-engraving, so people are getting rid of the pen except for quick notes. How long do you think it will *genuinely* last once we have some sort of electronic paper? My guess is months, not decades.

    When was the last time you employed someone whose CV was hand-written? :-)

  73. It is quite simple, yet still interesting, really. by Lundse · · Score: 1

    Computers are making it possible for us to delegate some responsibilities, such as spelling, to them.

    We are letting them do this.

    This is not a "loss" of the ability to spell, any more than cars are "losing" us the ability to get around.
    (I am aware that cars have made us less able to get around without cars, but this is hardly relevant as we can still get around. Same with spelling.)

    The really interesting bit is that I do not feel unable to spell, nor unable to remember words (though I mostly use wordweb or google for this previously intra-mental task). And people with cars feel able to do their shopping in town in 20 minutes. We are not wrong. We are just counting these technological artifacts as part of ourselves.

    Typing is moving your ability to spell around. Inside you. (For certain values of you).

    --
    IAIFARSIJDPOOTV - I Am In Fact A Reality Star; I Just Don't Play One On TV
  74. I noticed it too by Lazypete · · Score: 1

    I noticed the exact same thing. Im french by birth and some weeks ago i just started writing something down, i cant remember what it was, but i noticed how often i had to stop to think about my spelling. It might not just be the keyboard and typing but also that most of my work is done in english. That im loosing my french spelling... who knows! But I can confirm that im having a much harder time writing and spelling than i used to have.

  75. I don't understand the connection by DrVomact · · Score: 1
    I don't understand why you think the act of typing somehow causes your spelling or grammatical skills to deteriorate. Maybe you type too fast or carelessly; maybe you don't proofread. I personally hate to write anything by hand. Regrettably, there are still some formal communications (for example, those regarding death and weddings) that should be hand-written. I find this a painful and frustrating chore, as I am constantly making spelling mistakes, then have to buy a new card and start over. Come to think of it, nobody can read my handwriting, so it probably doesn't matter.

    Of course, I probably make as many typos per word as I misspell by hand...but thanks to the greatest gift of technology to the scrivener since the pencil eraser—the DELETE key—it is easy to make them disappear. Typos happen. Back when I was pounding away on college papers using my mother's Remington portable (the one with a greasy square of leather stuck on top of it so I could rest my head on it and doze in between inspired sentences), I would use erasable paper. The bottom of the typewriter frequently filled up with eraser fuzzies to the point where the keys wouldn't move, so I'd have to turn it upside down and whack it to empty it.

    If you were asking whether using electronic devices to communicate is deleterious to spelling and grammar skills, I'd have to say that, considering the ways in which these devices are used, it probably is. But it has nothing to do with typing. Standards are lower in email; typos and grammatical infelicities seem to be tolerated by people in email, though those same offenses in, say, a published book would cause complaint. The same is true of online fora. Were I to dare correct someone's spelling or grammar on /., I would be condemned as a "spelling nazi". I hardly need comment on that destroyer of articulate communication, the practice of "texting" and its egregious ally, "133t5p34k" (um...did I spell that right?).

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  76. its has some useful implecations too... by shreshtha · · Score: 1

    yes... dis ting has mo creeped in2 MS based IDE. sum times best way to xplain things is to give a C code. MS VC++ has incorporated (voila I got the spelin rite!) dis spell chk while writing code itself... dats i think a good ting...wat was da topic???

  77. Typing has ruined my handwriting by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the fact that my handwriting was always crap, typing HAS made it worse. I don't think it's had any effect on my spelling.

    However, using modern browsers like Firefox & Safari with spellcheckers have probably hurt it. It's not a problem at home, butt when I'mm at wrok with IE, I kant spel anymore.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  78. Re:I have never been the first to post. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    That's simply not true, both in my own personal experience and by a simple look at most of the articles on the /. front page today.

    Also, I read at "Raw and uncut", so I'll always see what you posted. Not that I'll necessarily read it... the 3-page nigger copypastas get skipped pretty quickly.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  79. Well, by damonlab · · Score: 2, Funny

    it could be worst.

    1. Re:Well, by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      If I had any moderator points, I'd mod you funny! :)

  80. No way by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    No, I don't have any such problems. First, as far as handwriting is concerned: I have recently rediscovered fountain pen as the ideal handwriting instrument ever invented and my handwriting stated slowly, but steadily improving. Perhaps it's just the joy of writing. :-) Second, spelling: There is no way in which a spell checker could *teach* me anything, ever. I am literate and well-read and I simply don't make systematic mistakes. Being a skilled translator might also have something to do with it. :-) Not even my second language - English - poses any substantial problems to me. As far as *accidental* mistakes are concerned, I am, of course, grateful for having a spell checker to highlight what it thinks that I have mistyped, but beyond that, my brain is quite capable of making its own decisions.

    Bottom line: You don't read enough. Go fetch some good novels.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  81. What is the question exactly? by gougou42 · · Score: 1

    Knowing how to spell is orthogonal to how you're writing. What are you asking exactly?

  82. Well, yes... by mea37 · · Score: 1

    There are many skills that used to be required learning for all, that are now known only to a handful of hobbiests. I guess I'm not sure why it's a "problem" that handwriting should be one of them. For that matter, handwriting as a universal skill has had a pretty short run if you put it in historical perspective.

    When I have reason to set pen to paper, I'm still able to convey my meaning. It may not be as pretty as if I still "wrote" instead of "printing" (or then again... my penmanship was never that great), but so what? When I need my message to look pretty - i.e. because it's for a prospective employer - the person receiving it is going to have a definition of "pretty" that requires me to use a computer anyway.

    If for some reason I'm caught without a washing machine I find that frustrating, too, but I don't lament the lost art of beating clothes on the rocks.

    1. Re:Well, yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many skills that used to be required learning for all, that are now known only to a handful of hobbiests.

      That's the hobbiest thing I've ever read! It's even hobbier than my horse, and my horse is very hobby.

  83. Oblig: The Spellchecker Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a spelling checker.
    It came with my PC.
    It plane lee marks four my revue
    Miss steaks aye can knot see.
    -
    Eye ran this poem threw it.
    Your sure real glad two no.
    Its very polished in its weigh,
    My checker tolled me sew.
    -
    A checker is a blessing.
    It freeze yew lodes of thyme.
    It helps me right awl stiles two reed,
    And aides me when aye rime.
    -
    Each frays comes posed up on my screen
    Eye trussed too bee a joule.
    The checker pours o'er every word
    To cheque sum spelling rule.
    -
    Bee fore a veiling checkers
    Hour spelling mite decline,
    And if we're laks oar have a laps,
    We wood bee maid too wine.
    -
    Butt now bee cause my spelling
    Is checked with such grate flare,
    There are know faults with in my cite,
    Of nun eye am a wear.
    -
    Now spelling does not phase me,
    It does knot bring a tier.
    My pay purrs awl due glad den
    With wrapped words fare as hear.
    -
    To rite with care is quite a feet
    Of witch won should be proud,
    And wee mussed dew the best wee can,
    Sew flaws are knot aloud.
    -
    Sow ewe can sea why aye dew prays
    Such soft wear four pea seas,
    And why eye brake in two averse
    Buy righting want too please.

  84. An alternate hypothesis by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

    Have you considered the possibility that you're just getting dumber?

  85. Spell checking used to be a luxury by mistermocha · · Score: 1

    ... then the fine folks at SpellStar came up with their version of relief: http://img.thedailywtf.com/images/mark/Mr_Magenta_Personal_Folder/notRolaids-small.jpg

  86. Not typing... by The+Moof · · Score: 1

    Typing? No. Internet message boards? Yes.

  87. Really? by jeffreyrand · · Score: 1

    Are hand written notes actually becoming obsolete? In the majority of the rest of the world (where they don't regularly read /.), the average person still uses pen and paper. I'm a programmer by trade, nerd by demeanor, and I, begrudgingly, have to write things down every once in a while. I don't think handwriting is becoming obsolete, not by a long shot. Its very easy to say that on some of the nerdiest board on the internets, and have many people agree with you, but that's only because we live in a vacuum. And I love my spellcheck.

  88. Ghost Type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I'm handwriting something and can't seem to spell a word, I typically "ghost type" in the air and can usually sort out what I need to sort out. Sad. :(

  89. Not at all by jgotts · · Score: 1

    Typing hasn't ruined my ability to spell at all. The more I read and the more I type, the more my spelling ability improves. Disable spelling and grammar checkers and take pride in what you write. That means proofread it the old fashioned way. Eventually people will compliment you on your writing ability.

  90. ability to spell by trb · · Score: 1
    there are really several related questions here: ability to spell, ability to type accurately, and ability to hand-write clearly, and ability to write coherently. those are different skills, and mixing them up doesn't help understand what's going on.

    people who have conservative opinions about writing and spelling tend to complain about the poor quality of language used in online communication. "omg orly? lol ttfn." if the reader doesn't understand the abbreviated strings, it's just noise. if the reader understands, then it is the same as "oh my god, oh really? laughing out loud, ta-ta for now." in its expanded form, is it bad writing? not particularly. the abbreviations are a commonly understood shorthand. to the extent that it's not commonly understood, it might be difficult to read, but it doesn't indicate poor communication.

    these same complainers talk about how online communication hurts writing skills. i think people write a lot more online than they wrote 25 years ago. we're not handwriting letters on paper and licking stamps any more. but i send hundreds of emails every week. and instead of writing longhand or typing on a typewriter or dictating text into an audio recorder and sending it to the typing pool, i use a text editor or word processor or text widget.

    back to the omg and lol abbreviatons. if people were that concerned about reading such shortcuts, they could use software to fix it, either on the transmit or receive sides. we could use predictive text systems like T9 or IMEs like those used to type Asian languages. a person could use such systems to convert the abbreviations into more fully-fledged language.

    now what about writing skills? "omg lolz" suffices in an im or sms message. if you're at work, maybe it's not so cool to write to a patient, "plz call the lab and schedule a chest mri, and have them send me the results of ur blood work." then again, doctors are known for their cryptic handwriting and rx abbrevs - sig 1 po qid pc prn. it's important to understand the message that your writing style conveys.

  91. Slashdot ruined my spelling by obtuse · · Score: 1

    I think the process of reading a lot of online forums has damaged my spelling. In order to read Slashdot, you have to be able to scan over random misspellings and typos. Consequently, they don't jump out at me in my own writing anymore. That's my excuse for my own deterioration, anyway.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  92. Damned kids... by Kratisto · · Score: 1

    In MY day, we had to draw every letter individually, then manually arrange them into words! And there weren't no spell check either! If you spelled a word wrong, the only person what would underline it with a red zig-zags was your teacher!

    And get off my lawn!

    --
    Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
  93. Improved! by krgallagher · · Score: 1
    I write a lot of business documents. I always run spell check on them. It is not safe to run spell check in a non-interactive mode. As a result, I have learned to correctly spell my most commonly misspelled words.

    "I've noticed that my grammar is also affected"
    I run a grammar checker too. My grammar has also improved.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

  94. Learn by fixing your own spelling mistakes by YITBOS · · Score: 1

    I generally use the "underline" from spell-checks as a "please try again" instead of just right-clicking and choosing the correct suggested word... and I do this immediately following a mistake; mid-sentence, (control+back-space to delete the entire word) and then respelling the word until it no longer is underlined in red before continuing (vs. typing everything out and then retroactively going back and correcting any spelling mistakes). This way I am correcting my own mistake and then retyping the word **correctly** instead of being given the answer. I've found that this method has helped my spelling immensely. In the past, I had a horrible tendency of always spelling "schedule" as "schedual." After a long enough time you begin to catch that spelling error before pressing the space-bar and it is underlined.... and then you just begin spelling it correctly.

    So my suggestion is to change the way you use the red/green spelling/grammar-check underlining... instead of using it to fix mistakes and errors, use it mainly as a way to identify that it is wrong and attempt to correct it without right-clicking for suggestions. (Again, "CTRL+Backspace" to backspace the entire word is a huge time-saver.) Of course if you get stuck and after a couple of tries you haven't gotten it, then you right-click. This will help to improve your retention of the correct spelling of the word after having spent time trying to correct it.

    Now, this does, of course, sacrifice your typed WPM... especially in the beginning. However, as your spelling improves, so will your WPM. (I believe I currently average around 75 WPM @ 100% accuracy but am closer to 120 WPM if I do not correct as I type.)

  95. It has been soooooo many years... by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

    I haven't hand written letters since I got my C-64. When a recent job application required a hand written section (who ever heard of such a thing!) I had to type it out and then write it. That gave me time to think about the wording and of course, check the spelling. Of course, now that everyone I want to communicate with has email, I don't send letters at all unless it is a cover letter with a resume. Even those are being submitted on line these days.

  96. Spelling mistakes by wfstanle · · Score: 1

    For those of you that can't spell too well and depend on a spell checker to help out...

    It won't always get you out of trouble. My brother asked me to proof read his resume. He used a spell checker and thought that there were not going to be any problems there. Yes, the spelling in the resume was correct but among glaring errors he wrote that he "attended three years at a local collage."

    If you don't see what is wrong with that statement, you have been relying too heavily on spell checkers. They do help but they are no substitute for knowing how to spell.

  97. No effect by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1
    Typing hasn't affected my spelling. I have not been able to spell much longer than I have been using a computer.

    The problem with autocorrection is they frequently autocorrect incorrectly and often the "corrected" sentence is less understandable than the mistyped version since the corrected word is no longer recognizable as a mangling of the intended word.

    --
    Squirrel!
  98. Cant lose what I never had by masmullin · · Score: 1

    nuf sayd.

  99. spell or print? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless I misread, it seems more like the story is saying typing has ruined his ability to PRINT, not to SPELL (though I'd counter that it sounds like a lack of practice causing the problem).

  100. tyPing chaNges spelLing abiLiTies by Silfax · · Score: 1

    i hAve been worKing as a softWare deVeloPer for over x19 yEars and have found that uSing a keyBoard everyDay does not seem to have had any impAct on my spelLing abiliTies, but for some reaSon it has caused me to insert rAndom capItal letters in the cenTer of words; for some reaSon i alSo end most senTences with a semiColon ratHer than the cusToMary perIod;
    --
    Silfax

  101. No, but handwriting is another matter. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    My ability to spell hasn't been impacted (I have never been a fan of spell checkers), but my ability to write by hand certainly has. My handwriting looks the same as it always has -- it's legible enough. However, I do it more slowly due to a lack of practice, and I get tired MUCH more easily. It used to be that I could write by hand for an hour or more. Now I have to put down the pen and shake some blood back into my hand every couple of minutes.

    More importantly, when I need to take notes, I show up with a netbook, not a pad and pen. I'm going to end up typing it up anyhow, and I don't write anywhere near 80 words per minute, so why not skip that step and type it up in the first place?

    If you were wondering about cursive script -- I abandoned that long before I became heavily reliant on typing.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  102. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your just stupid! HAH!

  103. Pidgin by Vahokif · · Score: 1

    If anything, I've noticed my spelling has improved since Pidgin started checking it while I type.

  104. Coding has ruined my writing by avandesande · · Score: 1

    My writing has become terse and choppy much like lines of code. I now need to proofread my writing and string together the sentences to make them more natural.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  105. Gonna say... maybe you should see a doctor by cybereal · · Score: 1

    I've been typing nearly my entire life. Spelling is not, and has never been a challenge to me. I can not recognize any association between my typing, my handwriting, and my spelling abilities. I almost never write by hand. The only side effect of this that I can tell is that my handwriting is either slow, or ugly, but the spelling still comes naturally.

    Perhaps you have another problem...

    --
    I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
  106. No by BraulioBezerra · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's been the other way. Specifically when learning new languages, I've found that reading a text and typing it at the same time is a very good way to learn how to spell the words, keep new vocabulary in your mind, and a lot of other things. This is the best way (besides talking) that I've found to learn a new language. Maybe this works with your mother language too, but I have not tested.

  107. No, but... by BOFslime · · Score: 1

    Spelling has probably improved because I get instant feedback and correction, but my handwriting resembles something a third grader would produce.

  108. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by Again · · Score: 1

    Your problem isn't that it's rote memorization -- I'm terrible at anything requiring rote memorization. Your problem (and a lot of other peoples') is you don't read enough books. I urge you and everyone else to acquaint yourselves with you local public library, or if you're in college, its library.

    Readaholics never have trouble with spelling, unless all they read is the internet.

    (Emphasis added)

    I beg to differ. I read a lot (though mostly Wheel of Time... repeatedly) and I do not have good spelling. Same as the GP, in school I was always bad at any subject which required rote memorization and spelling was always my worst.

    I don't think that typing has made my ability to spell any worse since it has always been terrible but my writing has become almost legendary for how bad it is. Sometime over the years I created my own font which is a horrible blend of script, monospaced and block letters which can only be deciphered by me, and not always by me.

  109. Well, by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    I'm simply used to writing things correctly, even with the keyboard. In all languages that I know.
    The good thing is that if you were good at it once, you can become good at it again, in very very short times. Something like a month.
    I noticed it, when I had to, because I got a job where I suddenly was surrounded by 20 French and Portuguese dudes every morning, that I had to communicate properly with.
    (No, my English is not perfect at the moment. It's because it's my third language, and in the summer, I just prefer to go outside and talk to real people in my native language. :)

    And I always enable my spell checker only when I'm done writing something.

    But you are right that you lose your trained abilities when you don't need them. That's efficiency at its best, and there is nothing wrong with it.
    An example of where it actually is bad, is our inability to run at least 100 miles in one run, like humans could do some 10k years ago, because of our habit, to wear shoes and to think their "assistance" would do us any good.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  110. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teh intarwebs don't maek u spel bad!

    (ok, that was just painful to write...)

  111. No... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    But spell check sure makes me lazy.

    Many times I find myself not actually trying to spell the word, but rather trying to trick MS word into spelling it for me. One thing I have noticed lately, and the respective companies may want to stand up and take notice, is that if I type something into google search it does a way better job of spell checking than MS Word by a fair margin. Perhaps this has to do with the search algorithm, perhaps it has to do with online resources. In either case I don't see why this won't come to pass. I am online 99% of the time when on a computer these days anyway. Perhaps Google Docs should notch it up a bit and knock off MS.

    Anyway the other point, is that MS Word is American. Default install and dictionary is American. I mean American English. I am Canadian. I spell color like colour, or at least I am supposed to. However even now "colour" has a damn red line under it saying it is incorrect. I think this will have a profound effect on the English language over the years as more and more people depend on it... it will homogenize the English language for good or ill to the American default. Sure I bet there are language packs, and alternate installs, but no one uses them, or they are a pain in the ass etc... Anyway just another reason to say MS is evil I guess.

    1. Re:No... by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      Yes, Microsoft are typical evil Americans for imposing their misspellings on everyone by default. But it is really not that hard to make standard English the default language for documents.

      Anyway, you should be using LaTeX and OpenOffice, like the rest of the geeks.;-)

  112. Writing is so SLOW. by Malkin · · Score: 1

    My spelling and grammar have not deteriorated at all, over the years. However, I find writing anything in longhand to be tedious and painful, now. I type 100 words-per-minute, and the quality of my writing suffers terribly when I'm forced to write anything long-hand, because it's so much slower than my usual written communication. I simply no longer have the patience for producing text so slowly and inefficiently.

  113. love letters by corbettw · · Score: 1

    I regularly (well, not regularly, but often enough) write my wife love letters on specially purchased (read: expensive) paper. Doing so creates a strong incentive to keep my hand-writing skills current and well practiced (and also helps ensure certain return favors on a regular basis).

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  114. literacy isn't just reading by marleyboy · · Score: 1

    This sort of thing really blows my mind. When necessary skills are taught by a machine, there's an over-reliance on the machines. I write short-stories and the like, and I prefer to hand-write the first draft and the second draft is when it goes into the computer. It slows me down and keeps the stories coherent. If I'm typing, my fingers start moving faster than my mind and I tend to start rambling.

    My point is, all knowledge is communicated through language. If we can't educate each other on spelling, word structure and punctuation, relying on the computer to do it for us, there are basic literacy fundamentals that are not being met. Sure, computer literacy is important, but language literacy isn't just knowing how to read, but also how to write. The brain needs to know how to form words, and just pushing buttons to make a computer assemble the words is not teaching knowledge. It's teaching laziness. I might argue that while computer literacy may be on the increase, its at the expense of basic language literacy.

    --
    Neutiquam erro
  115. Not me. by RobDude · · Score: 1

    It's the opposite for me....

    When I wrote, I frequently misspelled words. I'd take a 'stab' at it, and move on. If it turned out to be incorrect...well...I didn't much care. I had no trouble reading the words (correctly, or as I wrote them) and I could never bring myself to intentionally sit down and try to remember word spellings.

    Even if I wanted to correct the mistake, it took a lot of effort. If I cross it out and move on, it looks sloppy. If I'm using a pencil, I can erase (and it still looks sloppy). It's quite clear to the reader that I screwed up the word anyway.

    With computers, the whole thing works much better. First, thanks to auto-spell checkers I can see my errors *as they happen*. That sort of immediate feedback is great. Beyond that, I can fix it easily....backspace, hit a key or two and bam, we're good. Nobody knows that I screwed it up and it's an insignificant amount of work.

    Grammar...well that's another thing completely. I really feel like a lot of the grammatical rules are outdated by technology. When was the last time you saw someone indent a paragraph on the internet? And the whole punctuation inside a quote. Bah.

    Bottom line is, if a reasonable person can read and understand what you've written - mission accomplished. That's success.

    1. Re:Not me. by KingOfTheDustBunnies · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you saw someone indent a paragraph on the internet?

      Today, in fact. Of course, indenting is not grammar, but a style convention. The alternate style of placing a blank line between paragraphs has also been around for a long time. I wonder whether the reason for the prevalence of the latter style is that someone once decided to make a tab character equivalent to eight spaces, which is just hideous.

      Bottom line is, if a reasonable person can easily read and understand what you've written - mission accomplished. That's success.

      Fixed that for you. Far too many people are too lazy to fix their spelling errors and don't realize (or don't care) that this means extra work for their readers. If you[1] write a post with a bunch of misspellings that would have taken you 10 seconds to fix, it will take me 3 extra seconds to decipher your meaning.[2] If more than 3 people read your post, that's a net loss of time. If you write for a large audience and don't proofread, you're wasting a great many man-hours, and folks are entitled to disgruntlement.

      [1] "You" here does not refer to RobDude, whose comment was free of misspellings and easily comprehensible. Rather it's the general, hypothetical sort of "you", close kin to "one".

      [2] These numbers are made up and not based on careful testing. The real numbers would of course depend on many variables. But my main point[3] is valid.

      [3] Those who insist on saving a few seconds of their own time, at the cost of wasting comparable amounts of many others' time, are Not Nice.

    2. Re:Not me. by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      If I cross it out and move on, it looks sloppy. If I'm using a pencil, I can erase (and it still looks sloppy).

      What you need to understand is that it only looks so to you because of your ignorance. To a non-ignorant person, the uncorrected blunder looks far, far, far worse than the small blemish of the correction.

    3. Re:Not me. by RobDude · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that one isn't *more* worse than the other...I'm saying they *both* look bad.

      Truthfully, I believe that anything of importance should be written in a digital format these days. Any sort of work-related, school-related, or anything else of a semi-formal to formal nature should be typed.

      Anything that is handwritten is, by definition, informal and/or not important. I might scribble down a small list of 'To-buys' on my way to the store. If I spell a word incorrectly but can still still what word it is supposed to be, it works *just as well* as spelling that word correctly.

      If I make a mistake, correct it, and someone else reads it; they can easily tell that I've spelled a word incorrectly (and fixed it). If I don't fix it, there is a small chance they will not know the word is spelled incorrectly.

      Your argument is that it's 'more bad' to spell a word wrong and not fix it than it is to spell it bad and fix it. That's subjective.

      But, regardless, in any situation where I cared, the word would not be hand written.

  116. Yes. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    Old people write out words in perfect script, and see if they "look right". Youngsters type them in, and look for a red squiggly line underneath.

  117. I've been tempted, but... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

    ...my conventional keyboard/mouse arrangement had been stabbing my wrist for years, and the near-instant relief from that pain leaves me feeling more charitable.

  118. Spelling, no, handwriting, absolutely by BadERA · · Score: 1

    My cursive has gone to crap. Well, crappier crap. I've always been a typing guy. Cursive and me are archenemies. Not even frenemies, just all-out hate each other.

    A few years of early 20s partying too much, not sleeping enough and I saw my spelling skills go downhill a bit ... picked up books and started reading again, problem solved.

    --
    I am, therefore you think.
  119. It's the Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, when I see someone using the wrong homonym, like "the ball is in there court", it has a negative effect on my opinion of their intelligence. The same goes for the misuse of apostrophes; WHY do people think you need an apostrophe for a plural?

    Same here. Drives me nuts.

    By far the scarier part is that these poor habits are apparently slowly rubbing off on me. Every once in a blue moon, I'm horrified to catch myself adding an incorrect apostrophe or making one of the common mistakes like your/you're or their/there/they're. I never did that when I was younger. I get so used to seeing these mistakes in internet discussions that they seep into my subconscious and start eating away at the proper education I used to have.

    Reading Slashdot is making me dumber!

  120. Yeah.. my cuneiform is horible as well... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    .. and don't even get started on how bad my pictograms are...

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  121. Just use a spellcheck program by cashman73 · · Score: 1
    Mine works great!

    Eye halve a spelling chequer
    It came with my pea sea
    It plainly marques four my revue
    Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.

    Eye strike a key and type a word
    And weight four it two say
    Weather eye am wrong oar write
    It shows me strait a weigh.

    As soon as a mist ache is maid
    It nose bee fore two long
    And eye can put the error rite
    Its rare lea ever wrong.

    Eye have run this poem threw it
    I am shore your pleased two no
    Its letter perfect awl the weigh
    My chequer tolled me sew.

  122. Better, actually by invisik · · Score: 1

    My handwriting has never been that great, and I print 100% of the time to this day, so I've never been really encouraged to improve it. Typing everything ends up being an enabler for poor handwriting.

    For spelling, being reminded by the red squiggly line that it thinks I've misspelled something makes me take instant action to find the correct spelling--something paper and pen cannot do. Otherwise, I find my spelling no different when written vs typed. My spelling has always been pretty good.

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  123. Why was this modded funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the same situation as parent. I've always had to pay attention to my grammar, even when on IRC. The channel I've been most active in for the last 8 years or so has mainly female population and when I joined they kept complaining about how my messages were difficult to understand. (I was on 8th grade or so at the time) That forced me to use punctuation, capital letters, etc. etc...

    Yeah, I'm sure that my grammar and sentence structures are far from perfect in this post too. I blame that on English not being my first language, though. Punctuation rules are different and so on... But I do pay some attention to what I'm writing, erase and rewrite sentences that seem difficult to understand and read the messages again before posting (on forums, blogs and sites like Slashdot. I'm not quite as through in IRC). It makes a big difference. I know there are a lot of people (especially among those who have English as their first language) who could write with less errors than I do but don't because they just don't care. Slashdot comments often illustrate how people simply don't use the preview function and make massive errors with quote-tags or something else as stupid. In fact I would say that Internet usage has improved my grammar quite a lot as I write so much more because of that.

    To illustrate what the parent said about text messages... I was reading some material today and noticed a significant editing error. In one paragraph the word "you" had been written as "u" twice. I mentioned it in IRC and quoted the part which was something along the lines of "...to connect u should..." but I accidentally spelled that "...to connect you should..." twice. Using the correct way to spell words feels so natural that I am actually having hard time to misspell them even when I intentionally try to do it on IRC.

    That all said, I haven't had to write anything by hand since elementary school. After 9th grade I vent to vocational school to study data processing and then to college to study computer science. There are occasional exams and such in which I still need to use pen and paper but even the notes I take in classes are written on a laptop. As the result, my handwriting is horrible. I'm actually ashamed of it... When I try to write a card to someone I know, it looks as if it had been written by a fifth grader.

  124. The the impotence of proofreading by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

    Has this ever happened to you?
    You work very horde on a paper for English clash
    And then get a very glow raid (like a D or even a D=)
    and all because you are the word's liverwurst spoiler.
    Proofreading your peppers is a matter of the the utmost impotence.

    This is a problem that affects manly, manly students.
    I myself was such a bed spiller once upon a term
    that my English teacher in my sophomoric year,
    Mrs. Myth, said I would never get into a good colleague.
    And that's all I wanted, just to get into a good colleague.
    Not just anal community colleague,
    because I wouldn't be happy at anal community colleague.
    I needed a place that would offer me intellectual simulation,
    I really need to be challenged, challenged dentally.
    I know this makes me sound like a stereo,
    but I really wanted to go to an ivory legal collegue.
    So I needed to improvement
    or gone would be my dream of going to Harvard, Jail, or Prison
    (in Prison, New Jersey).

    So I got myself a spell checker
    and figured I was on Sleazy Street.

    But there are several missed aches
    that a spell chukker can't can't catch catch.
    For instant, if you accidentally leave a word
    your spell exchequer won't put it in you.
    And God for billing purposes only
    you should have serial problems with Tori Spelling
    your spell Chekhov might replace a word
    with one you had absolutely no detention of using.
    Because what do you want it to douch?
    It only does what you tell it to douche.
    You're the one with your hand on the mouth going clit, clit, clit.
    It just goes to show you how embargo
    one careless clit of the mouth can be.

    Which reminds me of this one time during my Junior Mint.
    The teacher read my entire paper on A Sale of Two Titties
    out loud to all of my assmates.
    I'm not joking, I'm totally cereal.
    It was the most humidifying experience of my life,
    being laughed at pubically.

    So do yourself a flavor and follow these two Pisces of advice:
    One: There is no prostitute for careful editing.
    And three: When it comes to proofreading,
    the red penis your friend.

    Taylor Mali is a genius.

  125. There's more to it than writing. by larwe · · Score: 1

    I'm younger than you, and I spent most of my adolescent life with the keyboard (Fidonet - age clue :) as my primary mode of communication, more so even than speech, so I would expect to show the same symptoms to a larger extent, ceteris paribus. However, I have no problem with either spelling or grammar [not to say I never break the rules of grammar, though], and my first act when installing a word processor is generally to disable the automatic spelling and grammar correction. (I also use a lot of technical words in everyday writing, and things like variable names that not infrequently start with two capital letters, so automatic spellchecking/case-correction software is a big annoyance to me). OP, I would hazard a guess that you don't read as much printed literature as you once did, and that is part of the reason why your MAD L33T SKILLZ are atrophying. It's not just the lack of pen-to-paper work, but also a lack of the other things you also used to do in the Age of Ink. Additionally, prominent content-generating people around you (newspaper reporters, for instance) are atrophying as well as the language homogenizes and words die, so the bar is constantly being lowered. I keep myself in mental shape by reading real books (sometimes electronically, I must say, but by real books I mean not saccharine, anti-intellectual content that was developed specifically for the Internet generation - I prefer English, American and French literature of the nineteenth and early twentieth century). I also keep a couple of manual typewriters in working order, and use them to write correspondence to politicians and keep my memoirs. When I write (in my engineering notebooks or the pocket notebook I carry with me) it's with a nice fountain pen that gives pleasure in the act of laying ink on the page. All of those things, and others I've forgotten to mention, help to keep your language skills in shape. Note that using a manual typewriter also keeps your typing accuracy up, as there's no invisible way to fix a typographical error made with an impact printing technology :)

  126. Get a notebook. A nice one. by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    The solution is obviously just to write more. I don't write because I have anything to say, I actually just like the physical sensation of putting pen to paper. I like seeing the letters that I leave behind, and I've learned to enjoy my handwriting and make it aesthetic, at least to my own eye. I prefer blank, unlined pages, and a nice gel-ink pen. I've got a leather bound notebook, and while I have nothing at all as interesting to put in it as the great scientists and inventors of years past, I feel like there's a small connection there.

    I've never had a problem with spelling, regardless of the medium. Spelling (and reading) were valued extremely highly in my household when I was growing up. My Dad would point out spelling errors in published works with great amusement, and he usually had 2 or 3 books on the go, as well as a magazine and the daily newspaper. In other words, it was an environment of attention to detail with regards to written words.

    I've got a lot of muscle memory when it comes to typing; I switched to dvorak about 10 years ago. Looking at the keyboard makes things much harder, so I rely on my muscle memory to get me through the day. In the end, you have to think about the words that you're typing as you type them. It sounds to me like you may be focussed on things at a higher level, ie., the sentence. Slow down a bit and I'm sure it'll come back to you.

  127. Spelling improved-script worsened. by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    My spelling has been aided by the constant auto correction features of my PC. But my hand writing has gotten even worse than it ever was. When one doesn't need to write by hand the ability declines quite a bit.

  128. adsfasd! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fd asdkjfal falie soel len !

  129. imo by rubah · · Score: 1

    I learned to type and spell during the same formative years. At spelling bees, when I wasn't too nervous to think straight, I would type out words in the air while I thought, much the same way other people said they pretended to write them out in the air.

    As long as you can go back and mime it, what does it matter if you think of typing first instead of longhand?

    anyways, learning a foriegn language is far more detrimental to spelling.

  130. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen to this. As a near-shut-in level social outcast while growing up, I read, a LOT. As a consequence I have very little trouble with spelling, but pronunciation sometimes throws me as my only exposure to much of my vocabulary has been through books.

    As far as IRC and texting are concerned, I always use full sentences, punctuation, etc., but then again I rarely texted until I bought a phone with a qwerty keyboard.

    Also I seem to be all alone in my insistence on full sentences, punctuation and capitalization in code comments.

  131. Nope. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    I'm a reasonably fast and accurate typist, but I can still write acceptably in cursive and regular print. I have a tendency to use notebooks (the kind made out of dead trees) to scratch down ideas and brainstorm, which is all the practice I really need to keep functional.

    I don't frankly care one way or the other whether people can type or write well. People who obsess over the decline of handwriting are generally pretentious wankers, who are probably also obsessing over the fact that no one wants to read Ulysses anymore either.

    But I think the reason people tend to make tons of spelling errors and have slop handwriting is because they don't bother to work at it. Even when I'm typing, I'll go back and fix typo's and correct words if I notice one is spelled incorrectly.

    It's not because I'm anal. It's because I'm bothering to write this shit down! This is ten minutes of my fucking life here! There will be a day when I'd happily kill a fucking puppy for 10 more minutes, and I'll think back and think, "Well I sure wasted a fucking ton of time on Slashdot, but at least I didn't look like an illiterate 12 year old girl!"

    The same is true of my handwriting. It's legible, it's got personality. I try not to misspell words. It's because I don't want some superficial prick to dismiss everything I've bothered to write down because it's straggly and shaky, and looks like something a kid wrote. I want them to look at it and say, "Jesus, not only is he brilliant and sexy, his handwriting is fucking exceptional! It's not straggly or shaky, it's legible, and it's got personality! If he spent that much time on his handwriting he must speak 12 languages, and play an instrument too!"

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  132. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by hermitville · · Score: 1

    Not true. As a child I read more books by far than anyone in my class, but I was never a particularly good speller.

  133. My nemesis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My spelling has gotten better. In my head, every time I run spell check or see a word underlined in red I take it as a hit to my intellect. When a spell check finds no errors, I AM VICTORIOUS!

  134. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here. I was (am) one of those obsessive readers the librarians know by name because of all the interlibrary loan books you get after running through the ones they have local. Despite that, spelling was always my worst subject. I think it was because I was still way too logical (INTJ) and expected spelling to make sense. I eventually got over that, and now my spelling is much better than it was when I was in school.

    (ObTangent: CAPTCHA was "flawless", but the "f" was mostly hidden under the stripes, so I put it in as "lawless")

  135. The Decline In Spelling Ability: +1, Helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is largely attributable to illiteracy and innumeracy. This disease, more prevalent in the United States than in other countries, is caused by a casual educational system and a preoccupation with SUVs, subprime mortgages, and the use of the world's most dangerous drug ( a.k.a television).

    I look forward to discuss this most insidious infection in the future on Slashdot.

    Yours In Novosibirsk,
    Kilgore Trout

  136. What I have noticed by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    What I noticed (after I starting chatting/foruming online) was that I lost some of my previous ability to use the correct form of their/there/their, read/reed, write/right, hair/hare, etc. I have noticed others losing it as well. It doesn't happen all the time, but more than one would expect (i.e. never) for the average college grad. This seems to defy logic as you can see what you are typing and should be able to distinguish the correct word to use. Maybe it is because we rush to type online chat/forum posts...

    --
    I come here for the love
  137. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by onesadcookie · · Score: 1

    Not in the least bit true. My wife is a prolific reader (a novel every couple of days since she was a child) and her spelling is awful. She has particular difficulty with double letters and apostrophes.

  138. Analogue vs digital by schizz69 · · Score: 1

    Its just another analogue skill replaced in a digital age.

  139. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disagree. I'm a readaholic, and I struggle plenty with spelling. I'm apparently opposite of the poster. There will be plenty of times when I don't know how to spell something, but my fingers do know. So I have to air type it and try to picture which keys my fingers hit. I've stopped thinking about my fingers hitting individual keys, but more thinking the word and my fingers know what do to.

  140. Computers have made my spelling better by Sirusjr · · Score: 1

    Noticing the same spelling mistake over and over causes me to eventually learn the correct spelling of the word rather than continue to spell incorrectly. Hand-writing notes in class would leave me with an incorrect spelling which I would later study and incorporate. However, when I type my in-class notes and have spell-check, I find that my spelling is corrected for the most part with a simple right click and I slowly realize which words I really didn't know how to spell.

  141. The Opposite by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    Between inline spellcheckers and T9 input on my phone, I actually find my spelling improving.

    An inline spell checker will tell you every time, patiently you've spelled a word wrong (as long as you don't have one that auto-corrects you), so the repetition teaches effectively. With T9, it's actually easier at times to spell out the whole word instead of trying to hack it to spell out the short hand phrases that used to be most efficient.

  142. Handwriting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in middle and high school, my parents sent me to a private school that did extensive handwriting and grammar instruction. It was far above what gets taught nowadays in public school. Into my twenties now, I have kept just about everything I learned, including good spelling, grammar, and handwriting.

    The key is just practice. You can't become a PHP developer overnight, but if you are determined to learn it, you'll eventually get good at it. The same is true of handwriting, spelling, and grammar. If you want to get good at it, you just have to commit to practicing and learning it. You'll eventually become great at it.

  143. A leopard cannot change its spots by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 1

    While you do have a point here, I have never been able to bring myself to degenerate my typing for an extended period of time without affecting my "proper for work" style. Using shorthand made me waste time during classes and tests because I had to check several times, having gotten used to misspell words to go faster &nbsp which, paradoxically, made me go more slowly.

    --
    "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
  144. Typing is easier than writing by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1

    My handwriting was never that great. I taught myself to write rather than waiting to go to school, and though it got improved it was never that good. While I was at school they changed from teaching cursive script to a different script, which was more legible, but it would've been nice to have had some consistency. When I learned to touch type at about age 19 or 20 my handwriting deteriorated markedly. These days I'm hopeless ... I still know how words are spelled, but actually writing them down is a different matter. My handwriting is full of crossed out words and inserted or mangled letters.

    Almost everything I write is done with a keyboard - writing anything by hand is rare for me.

    Incidentally, I was amazed a few years ago to get an email from a 3-year old niece. She could type because she could recognise the letters on the keyboard. Her spelling wasn't great but it was OK. But she hadn't yet learned how to actually make the letter shapes herself.

  145. Bash by antdude · · Score: 1
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  146. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  147. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  148. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  149. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  150. Who is this idiot submitter? by macraig · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that, if the submitter has observed a decline in the accuracy of his spelling, then that observation is correct. However, the conclusions he draws from it are... weird. I'm nearly as old as the submitter implies of himself, and I gave up cursive handwriting in eighth grade, long before I ever encountered a computer keyboard. I've been using keyboards daily since 1979. While it's true that I can't write CURSIVE worth a damn - I've forgotten the "flow" and how to form the letters - my actual ability to spell isn't affected one bit by either that or my use of keyboards. It is certainly true that some poorly designed keyboards (like the one I'm using now, sadly) actually encourage TYPING mistakes, those mistakes certainly don't carry over into another medium, and there's no reason to think they would.

    What are we talking about here... linguistic laziness? Place the blame where it belongs, because it doesn't belong with a keyboard.

  151. Trained readaholics by geek2k5 · · Score: 1

    I'm a readaholic who was trained to avoid spelling errors because they would affect my grades. Of course, there are a few words I mess up on a consistent basis.

    I think that I make more typing errors than spelling errors, so having spell check allows me to catch them before they go out. So the 'new' tech is useful.

    It can also be annoying if your spell check can't handle words like 'readaholic'.

  152. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by cbeley · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but when I read I never look at the full word. I read a ton in my youth and now I read news and textbooks all day, and I can tell you that it hasn't helped my spelling at all....at least I don't think it has.

  153. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  154. Blaming The Spellchecker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but no. Don't blame your bad spelling on your keyboard or your computer; you just haven't bothered to keep it in practice. Try spelling unfamiliar words on your own, then quickly look up the proper spelling in an online dictionary. It's never to late to re-learn.

  155. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by KnowOne256 · · Score: 1

    Amen. When I was in elementary school, I don't think I ever passed a spelling test. Sometime around the eighth-grade I discovered the joys of books. Fast forward a couple of years, and I was the person other people asked to spell words. Spelling and grammar, in my opinion, are a matter of pattern recognition. The more you are exposed to certain words and patterns of speech the easier it is to replicate it when writing. For example, I can spell the word "nebulous" because a certain author was in love with this word, so I must have read it hundreds of times.

    --
    When you start a fire, be to windward of it. Do not attack from the leeward. -- Sun Tzu
  156. RE: Is tiping rue-unyng yor ablelety to spel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ablalety to spel? No.

    My ablatety to ryte in cersyve? Absulootli.

  157. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by dangitman · · Score: 1

    I can confirm this. I'm excellent at spelling, and have never learned it by rote. Instead, I read lots of literature from a young age. Typing is my weakness, as I also learned that at a young age by experimenting and programming, rather than being taught proper technique. So it's always my fingers getting in the way of my brain, not the other way around, as so many excellent typists, but poor spellers, here on slashdot are attesting to.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  158. spelling, whatever by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

    Do you foresee a time when you won't be able to type into correctable word-processors? WIll you ever be in a spelling bee? Do you think society will technologically fail and we will be required to write out all our communication? If after typing something, do you lack(due to some condition or accident) the basic cognitive ability to see whether it is correct or incorrect, something that is harder to lose than rote-memory spelling knowledge? If your answer was yes to any of those questions, then you have a problem. Otherwise, its not something to worry about.

    I know a lot of people constantly griping about how kids today can't write in cursive; it doesn't matter. Largely, spelling doesn't matter either - in fact, for most of written history, spelling "correctly" wasn't a big deal. Just ask Shakespeare. Can you communicate? Then congratulations!

  159. I find the opposite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Originally I did, but now most browsers and editors have a spell check built in as you go, underlining mis-spelled words as you go. I immediately go back and fix a lazy mistake (like dont to don't or alot to a lot), or see where I spelled the word wrong. Over time, I am finding my spelling getting better.

  160. Typing vs. Writing by Geckomayhem · · Score: 1

    I used to text with mostly full words (predictive), with a few exceptions (eg. 2 for to, too and two); now the same holds true for emailing from my phone. But my main amount of electronic writing is in typing online: forum comments, etc. This means that I am writing in full sentences, continuing to exercise all of my grammar and spelling skills. When it comes to writing with a pen, which I do every day (I have kept a diary since I was 16), I haven't noticed a decline in my grammar or spelling at all. I guess with automatic spellcheckers and such people can be inculcated to rely on automatic correction or mistakes highlighted for them; as of now, I haven't been affected by this, and I can't see myself slipping anytime soon. If anything, my writing skills improve year by year: including the the ways in which I express myself. It's important to note that perfect, essay-style grammar is not the be all and end all of communication. So long as you express what you wish to say: with the variations in the ways that people express themselves through various media, then a slip here and there isn't going to cause you to lose your ability to communicate. ;)

  161. I have dysgraphia by voss · · Score: 1

    My handwriting is poor and slow and well below my academic level, as a child it left me frustrated and sad and hampered my ability to complete assignments in school.

    The computer has been my liberation, I enjoy writing with a computer in a way I could never do longhand.

    Spelling hasn't declined because of the computer, spelling has declined because teachers don't enforce it anymore.

    Spelling, grammar and handwriting are three different topics. My handwriting has always been lousy, but that has nothing to do with grammar or spelling.
    I was in the top 10 in my schools spelling bee, but I got a D on my grammar tests.

  162. riuning our ablity 2 spel? by bmecoli · · Score: 0

    i dont c a problm wit dat. lol

  163. Chinese Writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Chinese teacher was telling the other day that her Chinese character writing has gotten worse (she has no problems read Chinese characters). This is because she is doing all her writing on computers, forcing her to type the pinyin, rather than write characters.

  164. Typewritten spelling, not handwritten by tirerim · · Score: 1

    I don't think my written spelling has deteriorated; however, my typed spelling has. Specifically, I make a lot of homophone errors when typing, which I didn't use to. The interesting thing is that while my production has deteriorated, my recognition has not, so I still notice when I make errors -- but only after I've typed out the word. With something like their/there/they're, I can even type the wrong one, recognize the error, type the other wrong one, and only then get it right.

    1. Re:Typewritten spelling, not handwritten by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Strangely, I've noticed this at times when my workload's stressing me out - more homophone errors, that were immediately obvious when I read it back.

  165. Handwriting becoming a rare thing by edunetsys · · Score: 1

    We rarely wee hand written notes. We tend to always type out what ever notes we want to make. Class rooms have people taking their notes on laptops. The result is our handwriting becoming shodier with lots of gramatical mistakes. In an era where we type out everything, handwritten notes have become rare commodity. In fact one of my posts on Edunetsys.com I have emphasized that at least we must make sincere efforts to write half a pege daily.

    1. Re:Handwriting becoming a rare thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We rarely see handwritten notes. We tend to always type out whatever notes we want to make. Classrooms have people taking their notes on laptops. The result is our handwriting becoming shoddier with lots of grammatical mistakes. In an era where we type out everything, handwritten notes have become rare commodity. In fact, in one of my posts on Edunetsys.com I have emphasized that at least we must make sincere efforts to write half a page daily.

      I really hope I'm going to get whooshed for this.

  166. Ha! My handwriting was atrocious to start with. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    I couldn't get into word processing fast enough!

    When my first computer, (an Apple II) came on line, I was suddenly able to write things which didn't read like the result of mild brain damage. (Now, now. Settle down.) --So long, that is, as my notes didn't go over 10 pages or so, which would fill up the memory and choke the system.

    --The ability to edit a page in a non-linear fashion, inserting words and sentences, re-arranging thoughts, all of that made it feel as though I were lifting myself out of the drudgery of a 2D world to step into a 3D world! It was amazing, and I can only suppose that it is due to the vastly superior brains of other writers working in ye olden times that anything worth reading was even possible. --Either that or the whole phenomenon of second, third and (shudder) fourth drafts written in long-hand. Good lord! And they bled people to reduce fever, too.

    For my part, I accept my linguistic limitations and I've never looked back. --And if I did, I doubt I'd be able to make heads or tails of my own gawdawful chicken scratch notes.

    -FL

  167. Better Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is you're just stupid.

  168. I have noticed two other phenomena by Optimus6128 · · Score: 1

    When I type too fast on the internet I make phonetic (so do I call them) mistakes like:
    "I can sea you", instead of "I can see you"
    "I right a letter" instead of "I write a letter"
    etc.

    Another problem is that my hands type blindly and follow paths of other words than the ones I wanted to write:
    I wanted to write "I have computed the values" and I write "I have computer the values" for example.

    Those two strange problems occure after several years of writting on the keyboard that it goes too fast and my hands are like self living.

    I hate it when I later read some of my submitted texts and find such stupid mistakes :P

    --
    The "H-Word" has died for me.
  169. Spelling and Reading by scholl_r · · Score: 1

    Spelling is a skill that comes from READING, not from writing. If one continues to read regularly, one finds that a word "looks" wrong if misspelled. In fact, there are words that I really don't know how to spell, in the sense that I couldn't get them right in a spelling bee, but when I write them (incorrectly) I find I can tell by sight that they are wrongly spelled and correct them. Once is a while this takes two tries, but when it's right, I can tell.

  170. Our Faults, Dear Brutus by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    lie not within our typing, but our age.

    "My handwriting abilities have deteriorated over the years."
    and
    "(I'm used to Telex machines, which should give you an indication of how old I am.)"

    And you need a hint? Of course some of us are experiencing this. It's called "old". Say hello to entropy.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  171. definatly improving by alabandit · · Score: 1

    I find that all the little red lines have helped my spelling over the years. Being badly dyslexic I always struggled in school and university, though in resent years I have found by spelling and grammar has greatly improved, though its an active effort to spell words correctly and not just right click when I do get them wrong.

    --
    "You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people." by notnAP (846325)
  172. If you can't remember how to spell,... by inkhorn · · Score: 1

    and if you're used to Telex machines, perhaps you're actually just suffering from dementia ?

  173. I don't care... by v4vijayakumar · · Score: 1

    In India (south), even in last century, people used to write into palm leaves with a needle. I can not do that now, and I don't care. you will forget to type in couple of decades, when mind-computer interfaces become commonplace. Will you worry about your typing then ?

  174. Is typing reducing my ability to spell? by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 1

    No!!

    However it is reducing my hand writing ability.

    I find that when I do attempt to write stuff by hand, it is so slow that my brain skips ahead, and I start spelling out the next word before I have written the last one, hence words get mangled.

    However, since I can touch type quickly and accurately, I have enough time to use full, proper English sentences and go back and actually proofread to ensure I made no mistakes*.

    I feel that the use of a keyboard has actually made me a more effective communicator with regard to spelling, punctuation and grammar, provided that I have access to a keyboard.

    If I ever find myself in a situation with no keyboard available, then spelling is probably not a big priority anyway.

    *and no doubt Muphry's law guarantees that I make a mistake in this post.

    1. Re:Is typing reducing my ability to spell? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Muphry's law

      Did you do that on purpose?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  175. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    My handwriting is sloppy as well; I can hardly read it myself. Good job seeing that typo! I miss the old keyboard I had on my IBM XT, when you didn't press a letter hard enough you knew it. I suspect that's where some people's habits of saying "noone" and "alot" came from; they saw other peoples' typos on the internet, and assumed they were legitimate rather than typos.

  176. Re:I find my spelling has actually improved over t by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I not only don't see the full word, in a well written tome I don't see any words at all. My brain somehow translates the words into actions, figures, etc. without ever noticing that I'm reading. I don't see the words "he fell screaming to his death", I actually see the man falling and screaming and splattering on the ground with a sickening thud.

    Because of that I simply can't read Stephen King; he's too good a writer and his stuff just freaks me out too much.

  177. Loading... by Geminii · · Score: 1

    I've found myself swapping in older mental device drivers when going back to cursive from typing. It may not slow me down all that much, but there's definite higher neural CPU load as the bitrotted processes are parity-matched and extrapolated on the fly.

  178. not rly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what is dis ting called handwriting?

  179. Synesthesia by Tesla3 · · Score: 1

    Having to write less has definitely made my handwriting worse, but typing has greatly improved my spelling ability because the letters are easier to visualize, particularly in color. I'd be interested to hear if anyone else with some form Synesthesia agrees.

  180. You know what I miss? Tabbed paragraphs... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

    They're impossible to use consistently these days, because hitting tab when typing in a text entry box in a browser usually switches cursor focus to the "Post" or "Submit" button. Why hasn't the useless caps-lock key been turned into the "switch cursor focus" button, with the Tab key working like it's supposed to in text processing?

    Other than that, I'm actually pretty satisfied with my grammar/spelling - the only problem is that living in Germany is slowly ruining the English I managed to learn between Kindergarten and 10th grade...

  181. And my Son's by tarchibald · · Score: 1

    I knew handwritting, grammar and spelling stopped mattering the day my son's 7th grade teacher told me not to worry about his chicken scratch they used laptops.

  182. and computer's ruin your ability to sketch by rolandw · · Score: 1

    Computers are also ruining people's ability to draw. First of all 2D CAD removed any manual drafting skills and now rather than reaching for paper and pencil for a quick sketch people waste hours on some 3D modeller. Even diagramming is becoming the domain of the computer. Is it really quicker to do that quick flow chart on a computer than to doodle it out by hand? Is it really so much better? I still believe that all engineers and technicians should be taught the basis of sketching.

  183. Typing skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My typing skills have always been pretty good. Since I was a kid, I used to watch my mom typing at blazing speeds and I wanted to type as fast as her. Back then, mentioning your wpm rate in your resume, was as important as mentioning where you graduated.

    Now, I'm 25 and my typing skills have far surpassed my mom's. I've always maintained proper grammar, spelling and punctuation to the best of my abilities, regardless of the medium (IM, email, IRC, SMS). My english, grammar and typing teachers would twitch in their graves if I did otherwise. However, my handwriting has suffered. It is only rarely that I need to write anything on a piece of paper and my calligraphy hasn't deteriorated that much, I just need to focus on drawing the glyphs. What had truly degenerated is my "hand stamina". My hand hurts whenever I write anything more than two paragraphs at a time.I used to be able to write at least two entire pages before my hand started to hurt.